TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2025, 5:01 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
5:01:45PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
5:01:46PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
5:01:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
5:01:48PM >> VIERA?
5:01:49PM CARLSON?
5:01:51PM >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
5:01:51PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE.
5:01:52PM >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
5:01:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: AS YOU PROBABLY NOTICED, WE HAVE ONE
5:01:57PM COUNCILPERSON MISSING.
5:01:58PM LUIS VIERA HAD A PREVIOUSLY ARRANGED ABSENCE FOR THE
5:02:03PM EVENING.
5:02:04PM SO THIS IS WHAT YOU GET TONIGHT.
5:02:05PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:02:05PM OH, YOU WERE GETTING READY.
5:02:09PM YOU WERE LOCKED AND LOADED.
5:02:10PM OKAY.
5:02:11PM VERY GOOD.
5:02:11PM WE HAVE SOME HOUSEKEEPING TO DO.
5:02:13PM 8 AND 9 HAVE BEEN MISNOTICED.
5:02:16PM MOTION TO REMOVE THOSE FROM THE AGENDA?
5:02:24PM >> [INAUDIBLE]
5:02:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: TAKE IT AWAY.
5:02:25PM LET'S DO THE WALK-ON FIRST.
5:02:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK: BEFORE GETTING RID OF THESE?
5:02:32PM OKAY.
5:02:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT'S NOT ON MY THING, BUT WE'LL GO WITH
5:02:38PM YOU.
5:02:39PM GO AHEAD.
5:02:40PM >> [INAUDIBLE] -- THAT I AM WALKING ON.
5:02:47PM YOU SHOULD HAVE PHYSICAL COPIES OF IT IN FRONT OF YOU.
5:02:50PM IT WAS ALSO ADDED AS AN ADDENDUM TO TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
5:02:54PM THIS WOULD SIMPLY SET FOR DISCUSSION TO COMPLY WITH FLORIDA
5:03:01PM LAW 16331801 FLORIDA STATUTES IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A
5:03:08PM POSSIBLE INCREASE THE MULTIMODAL IMPACT FEE, IT WOULD SET
5:03:12PM THE ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION ON THE CITY'S REGULAR WORKSHOP
5:03:17PM AGENDA ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2025, AND OCTOBER 30, 2025.
5:03:22PM SO THAT IS WHAT THIS RESOLUTION WOULD DO.
5:03:26PM I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
5:03:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:03:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK: GIVEN THAT WE HAVE A VERY FULL AGENDA ON
5:03:34PM SEPTEMBER WORKSHOP, IT WOULD BE GREAT -- I WOULD LIKE A
5:03:39PM BRIEFING BEFORE AND MAYBE IF WE COULD EACH GET INDIVIDUAL
5:03:42PM BRIEFINGS AHEAD OF TIME SO WE ARE PREPARED.
5:03:45PM THAT WAY IT WILL SAVE US A LITTLE BIT OF TIME.
5:03:47PM I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.
5:03:49PM >> I'LL SCHEDULE THOSE.
5:03:50PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN I GET A MOTION TO SET THE TWO
5:03:52PM WORKSHOPS?
5:03:52PM ATTORNEY SHELBY.
5:03:55PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
5:03:57PM MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
5:04:00PM THESE ARE GOING TO BE -- THESE ARE OBVIOUSLY PUBLICLY
5:04:04PM NOTICED PER THE STATUTE REQUIREMENTS AND I UNDERSTAND IT
5:04:06PM WILL ALSO BE ADVERTISED OUTSIDE.
5:04:08PM BECAUSE OF THAT, IT IS SET FOR A TIME, I SUSPECT 9:00.
5:04:14PM >> 9:00 OR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER THAT.
5:04:17PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE BECAUSE ITS
5:04:22PM IMPORTANCE, WEIGHT AND THE WAY IT'S BEEN ADVERTISED THAT WE
5:04:25PM SET THESE FIRST ON THE AGENDA FOR BOTH WORKSHOPS, PLEASE.
5:04:30PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I MOVE THE RESOLUTION TO SET THESE MULTIMODAL
5:04:35PM TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE WORKSHOPS ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2025,
5:04:39PM AND OCTOBER 30th, 2025 AT 9 A.M. OR AS SOON THERE AFTER AS
5:04:45PM PRACTICAL IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, THIRD FLOOR, CITY HALL,
5:04:49PM 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
5:04:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LOOK AT YOU WITH THE ADDRESS.
5:04:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK: ONLY BECAUSE IT IS WRITTEN.
5:04:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:04:59PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:05:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS IT COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO HAVE THIS
5:05:02PM PLACED FIRST ON THE AGENDA FOR BOTH DAYS.
5:05:04PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S WHAT I READ.
5:05:06PM LITERALLY SAID 9 A.M. OR FIRST THEREAFTER.
5:05:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I THOUGHT YOU SAID AS SOON AS.
5:05:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NOBODY IS GETTING HERE BEFORE 9 A.M.
5:05:13PM WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:05:15PM A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:05:17PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:05:18PM OPPOSED?
5:05:18PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:05:20PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:05:21PM >> THANK YOU.
5:05:21PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DO YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH AND DO THE
5:05:24PM CLEANUP OR GOOD ENOUGH TO DO THE TWO ITEMS REMOVED?
5:05:27PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I THOUGHT ONE OF THEM HAD TO BE REMOVED
5:05:29PM BECAUSE IT WAS THE SECOND MISNOTICE.
5:05:35PM >> CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
5:05:37PM YES, ITEM 8 IS A MISNOTICE AND ALSO THE SECOND MISNOTICE FOR
5:05:45PM THIS PARTICULAR REZ-25-60.
5:05:48PM SO IT IS BEING WITHDRAWN.
5:05:50PM I DO HAVE THE LANGUAGE IF WE WANTED TO READ IT IN RELATED TO
5:05:52PM THE WITHDRAWAL.
5:05:53PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN I GET A MOTION, PLEASE?
5:06:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION TO --
5:06:10PM >>LYNN HURTAK: MOTION TO WITHDRAW REZ 25-60.
5:06:13PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:06:15PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:06:16PM ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:06:17PM OPPOSED?
5:06:17PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:06:18PM FOR 9, WE NEED TO -- MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO,
5:06:24PM SECOND FROM --
5:06:25PM >>LYNN HURTAK: REZ-25 -- [INAUDIBLE]
5:06:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:06:29PM ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:06:30PM OPPOSED?
5:06:31PM AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:06:32PM THANK YOU.
5:06:32PM ANYTHING ELSE?
5:06:34PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: ITEM 9, 25-95, THAT WAS THE OTHER
5:06:37PM MISNOTICE.
5:06:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT WE JUST REMOVED.
5:06:41PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THAT WAS IT.
5:06:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED.
5:06:46PM WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:06:47PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:06:48PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:06:50PM OPPOSED?
5:06:50PM THE AYES HAVE IT.
5:06:51PM I'D LIKE A MOTION TO OPEN ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS, PLEASE.
5:06:54PM MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:06:56PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:06:57PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:06:58PM OPPOSED?
5:06:58PM AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:07:00PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:07:00PM IF YOU ARE HERE THIS EVENING TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY ON ANY
5:07:06PM CASE THAT'S GOING TO BE BEFORE US TONIGHT, PLEASE STAND,
5:07:08PM RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND BE SWORN IN BY OUR CLERK.
5:07:12PM [OATH ADMINISTERED]
5:07:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:07:17PM WE ARE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD.
5:07:21PM IT'S GOING TO BE A NICE, QUICK, EASY NIGHT.
5:07:26PM NUMBER 1.
5:07:31PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: AGAIN, CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE,
5:07:33PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
5:07:35PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1 IS REZ-25-10.
5:07:40PM THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 4202 NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE FROM
5:07:45PM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, SH-RS, TO
5:07:48PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SH-PD.
5:07:53PM WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:07:55PM THE SUBJECT SITE THAT IS PART OF THIS APPLICATION IS
5:07:59PM OUTLINED IN RED.
5:08:01PM IT HAS FRONTAGE ALONG NORTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AVENUE AND EAST
5:08:05PM GENESEE STREET.
5:08:07PM THROUGH THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING APPLICATION, THE
5:08:12PM APPLICANT PROPOSES TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
5:08:16PM THE SUBJECT SITE TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST IS
5:08:21PM SURROUNDED BY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
5:08:24PM ALL OF THEM ARE ZONED SH-RS.
5:08:28PM WE DO HAVE A SITE PLAN AS WELL.
5:08:32PM THE SITE PLAN SHOWS BOTH THE EXISTING --
5:08:40PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY MOVE THE PAPER.
5:08:46PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THERE WE GO.
5:08:47PM THE SITE PLAN SHOWS BOTH THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED
5:08:52PM TWO-STORY RESIDENCE.
5:08:54PM THE EXISTING RESIDENCE HAS FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION TOWARD
5:08:57PM NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE.
5:08:58PM THERE IS ALSO A DRIVEWAY PROVIDING VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE
5:09:02PM SAME ROAD.
5:09:03PM THE PROPOSED TWO-STORY RESIDENCE HAS FRONT DOORS ORIENTED
5:09:08PM TOWARD EAST GENESE STREET.
5:09:11PM THERE IS AN ATTACHED CARPORT.
5:09:13PM I WILL NOTE REGARDING THE CARPORT THAT THE REVISED REVISION
5:09:18PM SHEET THAT I'LL GET TO YOU SHORTLY HAS THAT CARPORT BEING
5:09:22PM MOVED BACK 18 FEET FROM THE FRONT BUILDING FACADE.
5:09:26PM ADDITIONALLY, PARKING IS PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH DRIVEWAY
5:09:29PM AISLE.
5:09:30PM INGRESS/EGRESS IS PROVIDED BY WAY OF THE 10-FOOT ALLEYWAY.
5:09:34PM THE APPLICANT IS PRESERVING THE 55-INCH GRAND OAK.
5:09:38PM THERE IS A 24-FOOT SETBACK ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE
5:09:42PM SITE THAT HELPS PRESERVE THAT TREE.
5:09:48PM ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS FLEXI-PAVE THAT WILL BE INSTALLED
5:09:51PM WITHIN THE PROTECTIVE RADIUS OF THAT TREE, WITHIN A SECTION
5:09:55PM OF THE 10-FOOT ALLEY WAY.
5:09:57PM EACH OF THE UNITS WOULD BE LOCATED ON A SEPARATE LOT,
5:10:02PM TOTALING 4,455 SQUARE FEET.
5:10:05PM AND WE ALSO HAVE THE ELEVATION SHOWING -- ELEVATIONS OF THAT
5:10:19PM PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNIT.
5:10:21PM THE HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 28 FEET, 5 INCHES.
5:10:25PM OF COURSE, THEY SHOW ALL THE DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS OF HOW
5:10:29PM THAT PARTICULAR UNIT WOULD LOOK.
5:10:31PM NEXT WE HAVE PHOTOS.
5:10:38PM THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:10:40PM THE EXISTING HOME ON NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE.
5:10:43PM THIS IS THE SAME HOME.
5:10:45PM THIS IS THE VIEW FROM EAST GENESE STREET.
5:10:48PM ONE ADDITIONAL VIEW SHOWING THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE
5:10:52PM AS WELL AS THE GRAND OAK THAT WILL BE PRESERVED.
5:10:54PM THIS IS THE VIEW FROM EAST GENESE STREET.
5:10:58PM WE HAVE THE ALLEYWAY THAT WOULD BE USED FOR INGRESS/EGRESS
5:11:02PM FOR THE PROPOSED UNIT.
5:11:04PM AND IT ALSO SHOWS YOU THAT GRAND TREE THAT WOULD BE
5:11:07PM PRESERVED.
5:11:08PM NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:11:16PM EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:11:17PM AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON NORTH BRANCH.
5:11:22PM WE HAVE THE VIEW LOOKING NORTH ON NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE.
5:11:25PM SOUTH ON SEMINOLE AVENUE.
5:11:29PM EAST ON EAST GENESE.
5:11:32PM AND LOOKING WEST ON EAST GENESE.
5:11:36PM I DO HAVE THE REVISION SHEET THAT I WOULD LIKE TO -- THERE
5:11:50PM ARE TWO WAIVERS REQUESTED.
5:11:53PM ONE OF THOSE WAIVERS DOES NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE RECORD
5:11:56PM THIS EVENING.
5:11:58PM IT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND WAIVER NOTED ON THE COVER SHEET OF
5:12:04PM THE STAFF REPORT.
5:12:06PM THIS IS THE REQUEST TO REDUCE PARCEL B FRONT BUILD-TO LINE
5:12:10PM FROM 20 FEET TO 10 FEET.
5:12:12PM THIS IS BEING CORRECTED TO REFLECT A REDUCTION FROM 20 FEET
5:12:16PM TO 18 FEET.
5:12:18PM AND, OF COURSE, WE WANTED TO GET THAT OUT THERE, AND THAT
5:12:24PM WAY IT'S NOTED ALONG WITH THE CARPORT ITEM THAT I ALSO HAVE
5:12:28PM MENTIONED IN THIS PRESENTATION.
5:12:31PM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF, WE'VE REVIEWED THIS
5:12:35PM PETITION.
5:12:35PM WE FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF
5:12:38PM TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
5:12:39PM IF COUNCIL APPROVES THE APPLICATION, THE MODIFICATION TO THE
5:12:43PM SITE PLAN ON THE SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED
5:12:46PM BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS, AND I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR
5:12:49PM ANY QUESTIONS.
5:12:50PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:12:52PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU.
5:12:53PM I'M ASSUMING THAT THAT CHANGE FROM 10 TO 18 IS BECAUSE YOU
5:12:56PM DON'T HAVE TO COUNT THE FRONTAGE FOR A PORCH IN SEMINOLE
5:12:59PM HEIGHTS DUE TO THE OVERLAY CODE.
5:13:03PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: WELL, IT RELATES TO -- YOU'RE
5:13:07PM REFERRING TO THE ONE REQUIRING A 20-FOOT SETBACK.
5:13:12PM THE WAIVER -- THAT ONE, IT IS --
5:13:16PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M SORRY.
5:13:17PM FROM 10 TO 18.
5:13:18PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: CORRECT.
5:13:20PM IT'S ACTUALLY BEING TRIGGERED BECAUSE THE HOME TO THE EAST
5:13:24PM FACES NORTH SEMINOLE.
5:13:26PM AND THE HOME TO THE WEST IS ON NORTH BRANCH STREET.
5:13:33PM SO THERE WASN'T ANOTHER HOME THAT THEY COULD USE TO HAVE AN
5:13:37PM AVERAGE FOR THAT BUILD-TO.
5:13:39PM SO IT ACTUALLY REVERTS TO A 20-FOOT BUILD-TO LINE.
5:13:43PM AND, OF COURSE, WITH THIS, THEY CAN'T QUITE MEET THAT
5:13:46PM 20-FOOT SETBACK, SO THEY ARE ASKING FOR THAT REDUCTION BY 2
5:13:50PM FEET.
5:13:50PM >>LYNN HURTAK: SO THAT 18 GOES TO THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE?
5:13:55PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: IT ACTUALLY GOES TO THE BUILDING
5:13:57PM FRONT FACADE.
5:13:59PM WE DO HAVE A 10-FOOT SETBACK NOTED HERE FOR THE COVERED
5:14:02PM PORCH.
5:14:04PM THAT REVISED REVISION SHEET YOU HAVE DOES NOTE THAT THEY
5:14:09PM NEED TO NOTE AN ADDITIONAL SETBACK NOTING THAT 18-FOOT
5:14:14PM DISTANCE THERE.
5:14:15PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU.
5:14:15PM I APPRECIATE YOU FIXING THE CARPORT, TOO.
5:14:18PM THAT IS NOW UP TO CODE.
5:14:21PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:14:22PM VERY GOOD.
5:14:25PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
5:14:32PM >> THANK YOU.
5:14:33PM JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
5:14:36PM THIS IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND EAST
5:14:39PM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
5:14:40PM THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
5:14:43PM WE FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD,
5:14:46PM AND THIS WOULD ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY
5:14:48PM DETACHED ZONING LOTS AND A DENSITY OF TEN DWELLING UNITS PER
5:14:52PM ACRE, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND
5:14:54PM USE.
5:14:54PM WE ALSO FOUND THAT IT WAS PROMOTING THE INTENT OF THE
5:14:59PM OVERLAY, AND WE HAVE POLICIES THAT RELATE TO THAT AS WELL.
5:15:02PM I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:15:03PM THANK YOU.
5:15:04PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY QUESTIONS?
5:15:05PM DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT?
5:15:07PM GOOD EVENING.
5:15:10PM >> GOOD EVENING.
5:15:11PM MY NAME IS DAVID WRIGHT, TSP COMPANIES.
5:15:14PM 20085 SABAL PALM COURT.
5:15:17PM I'M NOT GOING TO REGURGITATE ANY OF THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO
5:15:21PM YOU BY STAFF.
5:15:21PM WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH BOTH STAFF REPORTS AND THE FINDING
5:15:24PM OF CONSISTENT.
5:15:24PM I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
5:15:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:15:28PM ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
5:15:32PM MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:15:34PM SECOND FROM MIRANDA.
5:15:35PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:15:36PM OPPOSED?
5:15:36PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:15:38PM COUNCILMAN CARLSON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ IT.
5:15:41PM THERE IS A REVISION SHEET.
5:15:43PM REVISED REVISION SHEET WITH THE CHANGES FOR PARCEL B.
5:15:48PM >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE ITEM 1, REZ-25-10, ORDINANCE BEING
5:15:54PM PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE
5:15:57PM REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 4202 NORTH
5:16:00PM SEMINOLE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE
5:16:02PM PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
5:16:04PM CLASSIFICATION SH-RS (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, RESIDENTIAL,
5:16:08PM SINGLE-FAMILY) TO SH-PD (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PLANNED
5:16:13PM DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, DETACHED) PROVIDING
5:16:16PM AN EFFECTIVE DATE, INCLUDING THE REVISED REVISION SHEET.
5:16:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
5:16:20PM WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:16:22PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:16:24PM OPPOSED?
5:16:24PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:16:27PM >>THE CLERK: SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON
5:16:29PM OCTOBER 9, 2025 AT 10 A.M. AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD,
5:16:32PM THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
5:16:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I SAID UNANIMOUSLY.
5:16:45PM THOSE OF YOU THAT JUST WALKED IN, ARE YOU PLANNING ON
5:16:47PM TESTIFYING THIS EVENING?
5:16:48PM I SEE NEW PEOPLE HAVE SHOWN UP, IF YOU PLAN TO SPEAK, PLEASE
5:17:01PM STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN BY OUR CLERK.
5:17:07PM [OATH ADMINISTERED]
5:17:14PM GENTLEMEN, THE APPLICANT FROM THE PREVIOUS, YOU ARE ALL SET
5:17:17PM UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
5:17:18PM WE ARE ON ITEM 2.
5:17:22PM THANK YOU.
5:17:29PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT
5:17:32PM COORDINATION.
5:17:32PM AGENDA ITEM 2 IS REZ 25-57.
5:17:35PM THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 5101 NORTH 34th STREET AND
5:17:40PM 3404 EAST WILDER AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RS 50
5:17:44PM TO COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, CN.
5:17:46PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED.
5:17:49PM IT IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
5:17:52PM NORTH 34th STREET AND EAST WILDER AVENUE.
5:17:56PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS IMPROVED WITH A ONE STORY BUILDING.
5:17:59PM THE LOT TOTALS 10,918 SQUARE FEET.
5:18:03PM IT'S ALSO LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT AND
5:18:06PM MUST COMPLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THIS
5:18:10PM OVERLAY DISTRICT AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
5:18:12PM THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTS OF
5:18:15PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS TO THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST.
5:18:19PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE THE FAIR OAKS COMMUNITY
5:18:23PM CENTER AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS
5:18:27PM ASSEMBLY.
5:18:28PM NEXT WE HAVE A SURVEY.
5:18:32PM SURVEY OUTLINED IN GREEN SHOWS THE SUBJECT SITE HAVING 106
5:18:37PM FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG NORTH 34th STREET AND 102
5:18:42PM FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG EAST WILDER AVENUE.
5:18:45PM GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, THE REQUESTED USE OF COMMERCIAL
5:18:49PM NEIGHBORHOOD IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION AND IT PROVIDES FOR
5:18:53PM AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION WITHIN THE SURROUNDING PARCELS.
5:18:57PM SINCE THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING, WE DO NOT HAVE A SITE
5:18:59PM PLAN OR ELEVATIONS TO PROVIDE, BUT I DO HAVE PHOTOS SHOWING
5:19:04PM THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREAS.
5:19:06PM THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM NORTH 34th.
5:19:10PM THIS IS LOOKING EAST.
5:19:11PM THIS IS AT THE INTERSECTION LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE SUBJECT
5:19:14PM SITE.
5:19:15PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH TO NORTH ON THE EAST WILDER.
5:19:20PM THESE ARE THE DETACHED UNITS I MENTIONED NORTH OF THE
5:19:25PM SUBJECT SITE, SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE THE FAIR
5:19:29PM OAKS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER.
5:19:30PM EAST IS THE RELIGIOUS -- IS THE CHURCH.
5:19:36PM AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE ANOTHER DETACHED UNIT.
5:19:41PM ONE ADDITIONAL PHOTO IS LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM THE SUBJECT
5:19:44PM SITE.
5:19:45PM AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS NEARBY
5:19:50PM TO THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:19:51PM AND OUR FINDING HERE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION COMPLIANCE
5:19:59PM STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION.
5:20:01PM WE FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
5:20:03PM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY
5:20:06PM QUESTIONS.
5:20:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:20:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU.
5:20:08PM IF YOU COULD PUT THAT INITIAL, LIKE, PICTURE -- YEAH, THAT.
5:20:12PM NO, NO.
5:20:13PM THE NEXT ONE.
5:20:15PM SO THIS SHOWS PARKING TO THE STREET, ON THE STREET SIDE.
5:20:22PM THE FIRST IMAGE YOU SHOWED, SHOWED PARKING THAT WAS RIGHT UP
5:20:25PM NEXT TO THE BUILDING.
5:20:26PM WHICH IS IT?
5:20:31PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: LOOKING AT THE PHOTO WOULD BE RIGHT
5:20:33PM UP AGAINST THE BUILDING.
5:20:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES, I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS ARE THEY
5:20:38PM GOING TO HAVE TO ABIDE BY THIS NEW IMAGE THAT HAS THE
5:20:42PM PARKING.
5:20:44PM SO IT'S NOT A PD.
5:20:45PM OKAY.
5:20:46PM JUST CURIOUS.
5:20:47PM I WAS JUST HOPING.
5:20:53PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS?
5:20:54PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF?
5:21:01PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING
5:21:04PM COMMISSION.
5:21:05PM THIS IS RESIDENTIAL 10.
5:21:07PM AS YOU MAY KNOW, THERE IS A LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
5:21:11PM COMMERCIAL USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 IF
5:21:14PM IT MEETS COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
5:21:18PM THE SURROUNDING AREA IS RESIDENTIAL 10 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
5:21:22PM THE PARK TO THE SOUTH.
5:21:23PM THAT IS THE FAIR OAKS PARK.
5:21:25PM STAFF REVIEWED THIS CAREFULLY AND FOUND THAT WHILE IT DOES
5:21:30PM NOT MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AS WRITTEN, BECAUSE 50% OF THE
5:21:36PM BLOCK FACE IS NOT ZONED COMMERCIAL, THIS HAS BEEN OPERATING
5:21:41PM AS A COMMERCIAL USE AND THE BUILDING HAS BEEN THERE SINCE
5:21:44PM 1946.
5:21:45PM WE FOUND THAT SINCE IT IS ALSO INTERFACING NORTH 35th
5:21:50PM STREET, WHICH IS THE BORDER OF THE LEGACY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD
5:21:52PM AND ALSO A COLLECTOR ROADWAY, IT COULD BE CONSIDERED AT THE
5:21:55PM EDGE OF A ROADWAY.
5:21:57PM DUE TO THE HISTORY OF THE SITE, THE CURRENT STATUS, ALONG
5:21:59PM WITH THE LOCATION CAUSING LITTLE ENCROACHMENT INTO
5:22:03PM RESIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS, STAFF FINDS
5:22:05PM THAT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES ARE APPROPRIATE AT
5:22:08PM THIS LOCATION IN THIS LAND USE CATEGORY.
5:22:11PM SO I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN THAT FOR THE RECORD.
5:22:14PM IT DOES NOT MEET IT, AGAIN, BUT DO THINK IT APPROPRIATE HERE
5:22:20PM AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
5:22:22PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:22:23PM ANY QUESTIONS?
5:22:23PM DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT?
5:22:25PM IS THERE AN APPLICANT?
5:22:32PM WERE YOU SWORN IN?
5:22:39PM DID YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND BE SWORN IN?
5:22:42PM WOULD YOU SWEAR HIM IN, PLEASE?
5:22:46PM [OATH ADMINISTERED]
5:22:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY.
5:22:53PM GO AHEAD.
5:22:55PM >> SOME PICTURES FOR YOU.
5:22:58PM I'M JOSEPH.
5:22:58PM GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.
5:23:01PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SAY YOUR FIRST AND LAST NAME.
5:23:04PM >> JOSEPH LOUIS.
5:23:10PM 5101 BUILT IN 1949 -- NO, 1946, AFTER THE WAR.
5:23:17PM THIS IS -- IN THE ZONING, PUT IN FOR -- THIS IS A COMMERCIAL
5:23:32PM BUILDING.
5:23:32PM I BUY THE BUILDING TWO YEARS AGO.
5:23:35PM ANYTHING WE TRY TO DO FOR RENOVATION, ROOFING, STUCCO IT, WE
5:23:40PM CAN GET THE PERMIT BECAUSE IT IS WRONG ZONING.
5:23:47PM WE TRY TONIGHT.
5:23:48PM WE SEE IF WE CAN PUT IN THE CURRENT ZONING.
5:23:57PM THIS IS CN.
5:23:58PM NOW WE TRY PUTTING THEM TOGETHER, SAME BEFORE, SOMEONE ASKED
5:24:04PM FOR THE PARKING, WE USE A LOT BEHIND FOR PUT MORE PARKING,
5:24:11PM FOR MAKING IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER --
5:24:15PM THIS IS WHERE WE COME IN TO DO IT.
5:24:17PM BECAUSE WE GOT STUFF TO DO RENOVATION, BUT WE CAN'T NOT GET
5:24:22PM PERMIT BECAUSE THE BUILDING, BUILT IN 1946 IS IN THE WRONG
5:24:29PM ZONING.
5:24:30PM WE TRIED PUT ZONING B AND THEN CN, SO WE CAN OPERATE THE
5:24:36PM BUILDING CORRECTLY.
5:24:37PM THIS IS WHAT WE COME.
5:24:40PM WE SEE THE BUILDING.
5:24:41PM THIS IS LIKE A FULL -- WE KNOW 34 -- NEXT DOOR, BUILD
5:24:51PM TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
5:24:53PM THAT MEAN THIS BUILDING CAN BE A PLUS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
5:24:58PM WE'RE NOT IN THE CORRECT ZONE.
5:25:00PM ERROR FROM 1942.
5:25:05PM TODAY WE ARE IN 2020.
5:25:06PM WE MUST PUT THIS IN THE CORRECT ZONING SO WE CAN MOVE
5:25:10PM FORWARD.
5:25:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE UNDERSTAND THAT PART.
5:25:12PM ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD?
5:25:19PM >> NO.
5:25:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:25:21PM IF YOU HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO ADD, IS THERE A -- ANYBODY IN
5:25:26PM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
5:25:28PM HEARING NONE, CAN WE GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
5:25:30PM MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:25:32PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:25:33PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:25:35PM OPPOSED?
5:25:35PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:25:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK: FILE REZ 25-57, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED
5:25:41PM FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING
5:25:43PM PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5101 NORTH 34th STREET
5:25:50PM AND 3404 EAST WILDER AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA
5:25:54PM AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
5:25:56PM DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY,
5:25:59PM TO CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
5:26:02PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:26:04PM A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:26:05PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:26:08PM OPPOSED?
5:26:08PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:26:10PM >>THE CLERK: SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION --
5:26:14PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HOLD ON ONE SECOND.
5:26:16PM LISTEN FOR THE DATE.
5:26:18PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING
5:26:24PM ABSENT.
5:26:24PM SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 2025 AT
5:26:28PM 10 A.M. AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA,
5:26:32PM FLORIDA, 33602.
5:26:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:26:34PM DID YOU COPY THAT?
5:26:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: OCTOBER 9, 10 A.M.
5:26:39PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THINGS HAVE TO BE HEARD TWO TIMES.
5:26:41PM SO THAT WILL BE THE SECOND TIME.
5:26:43PM VERY GOOD.
5:26:45PM THANK YOU SO MUCH.
5:26:46PM ITEM NUMBER 3.
5:26:55PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
5:26:57PM FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT
5:26:59PM COORDINATION.
5:27:00PM AGENDA ITEM 3 IS REZ-25-59.
5:27:03PM THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 6600, 6602, 6604, 6606, 6610,
5:27:10PM 6612, 6614, 6616, AND 6618 SOUTH STERLING AVENUE AND 6713,
5:27:18PM 6715, AND 6717 SOUTH HIMES AVENUE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
5:27:25PM TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
5:27:29PM USES.
5:27:30PM I'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:27:34PM IT IS OUTLINED IN RED.
5:27:36PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF WEST EVERETT AVENUE.
5:27:40PM IT IS NORTH OF WEST BURIEN DRIVE.
5:27:44PM IT IS LOCATED EAST OF SOUTH STERLING AVENUE AND ALSO LOCATED
5:27:49PM WEST OF SOUTH HIMES AVENUE.
5:27:51PM SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING TO THE
5:27:56PM NORTH FOR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND SEMI DETACHED USES.
5:28:02PM TO THE EAST AND SOUTH, WE HAVE RS 60 ZONING AND THE PARCELS
5:28:07PM THERE ARE DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES, AND
5:28:11PM WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A VACANT PARCEL ZONED
5:28:15PM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND A PARCEL IMPROVED WITH A WAREHOUSE
5:28:18PM ZONED INDUSTRIAL GENERAL.
5:28:20PM THE CURRENT PD ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS APPROVED FOR TEN
5:28:26PM RESIDENTIAL DETACHED UNITS.
5:28:28PM THE APPLICANT THROUGH THE REQUESTED PD REZONING PROPOSES THE
5:28:33PM SAME NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS.
5:28:35PM THE ONLY CHANGE IS FROM THE CURRENT PD IS THE PROPOSED
5:28:39PM SETBACKS.
5:28:40PM WE DO HAVE THE SITE PLAN WE CAN GO OVER HERE.
5:28:44PM LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, PARCELS A THROUGH H ARE
5:29:03PM PROPOSED EAST OF SOUTH STERLING AVENUE, WHICH WOULD BE
5:29:06PM CONSTRUCTED THROUGH THIS APPLICATION.
5:29:08PM BOTH THE FRONT DOORS AS WELL AS THE VEHICULAR ACCESS THROUGH
5:29:12PM THE DRIVEWAYS ARE ALL ORIENTED TOWARD SOUTH STERLING AVENUE.
5:29:17PM PARCEL K, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH END OF THE SUBJECT
5:29:20PM SITE WOULD HAVE LOT FRONTAGE ON BOTH SOUTH STERLING AVENUE
5:29:26PM AND SOUTH HIMES AVENUE, AND IT HAS A STORMWATER POND
5:29:30PM PROPOSED AND PARCELS I THROUGH J WOULD HAVE DETACHED UNITS
5:29:38PM WITH FRONT DOORS ORIENTED TOWARD SOUTH HIMES AVENUE, ALONG
5:29:42PM WITH THEIR PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS.
5:29:44PM THE SITE TOTALS 2.2 ACRES.
5:29:48PM IT IS VACANT.
5:29:50PM ONE ADDITIONAL THING TO NOTE IS THAT THERE ARE FIVE-FOOT
5:29:53PM SIDEWALKS PROPOSED ALONG PORTIONS OF EACH OF THE MENTIONED
5:29:59PM RIGHT-OF-WAYS.
5:30:01PM WE ALSO HAVE -- THERE ARE TWO SETS OF ELEVATIONS THAT I CAN
5:30:08PM SHOW.
5:30:08PM EACH SET SHOWS AN EXAMPLE OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNIT
5:30:15PM WITH A MAX HEIGHT OF 35 FEET.
5:30:19PM THE FIRST SET OF ELEVATIONS AND THE SECOND SET OF
5:30:24PM ELEVATIONS.
5:30:24PM I CAN ZOOM IN A LITTLE CLOSER IF NEED BE.
5:30:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IF I CAN SEE IT, I KNOW EVERYBODY ELSE
5:30:35PM CAN.
5:30:38PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: VERY GOOD.
5:30:39PM NEXT WE HAVE, AFTER THAT, JUMP IN HERE, WE HAVE TWO WAIVERS,
5:30:45PM WHICH WERE ALSO REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
5:30:48PM THEY WERE ACTUALLY APPROVED WITH THE PRIOR PD, SO THEY ARE
5:30:52PM MORE OR LESS CARRY-OVERS.
5:30:54PM LOOKING AT PHOTOS OF THE SITE, THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE
5:31:05PM SUBJECT SITE LOOKING SOUTH FROM WEST EVERETT.
5:31:09PM THIS IS A PHOTO INTERNALLY OF THE SITE.
5:31:13PM YOU CAN KIND OF SEE RIGHT HERE WHERE SOUTH STERLING AVENUE
5:31:16PM WOULD LIKELY BE CONSTRUCTED.
5:31:18PM THIS IS LOOKING EAST OR LOOKING WEST, ACTUALLY, FROM SOUTH
5:31:23PM HIMES AVENUE.
5:31:26PM NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, THIS IS AN EXAMPLE, THESE ARE THE
5:31:29PM SEMI DETACHED UNITS -- I'M SORRY.
5:31:31PM THESE ARE ACTUALLY THE ATTACHED UNITS THAT ARE NORTH OF THE
5:31:35PM SUBJECT SITE.
5:31:36PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG WEST BURIEN, THIS IS AN
5:31:42PM EXAMPLE OF THE DETACHED UNITS WHICH YOU FIND ON THE EAST
5:31:46PM SIDE OF SOUTH HIMES AVENUE.
5:31:47PM AND LOOKING WEST, YOU'VE GOT LARGELY TREES AND SWAMP.
5:31:56PM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
5:31:58PM APPLICATION.
5:31:59PM WE FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF
5:32:02PM TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
5:32:04PM SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
5:32:05PM APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN MUST BE
5:32:09PM COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING
5:32:12PM OF THE ORDINANCE AS STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET.
5:32:15PM AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:32:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:32:19PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD
5:32:21PM CORRECTLY.
5:32:22PM BASICALLY, THE ONLY REASON WE'RE HERE, WE ALREADY APPROVED
5:32:25PM THIS BECAUSE I REMEMBER THIS ONE.
5:32:28PM ALL WE'RE DOING IS CHANGING THE SETBACKS.
5:32:30PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: CORRECT.
5:32:32PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IT'S LIKE A LARGE SCRIVENER'S ERROR.
5:32:35PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: I ACTUALLY HAVE A COMPARISON HERE
5:32:37PM BETWEEN THE CURRENT REQUEST AND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
5:32:40PM REQUEST OF THE SETBACKS.
5:32:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:32:43PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
5:32:51PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING
5:32:53PM COMMISSION.
5:32:54PM THIS WILL BE EXTREMELY BRIEF.
5:32:56PM THIS IS RELATIVELY RECENT AND IT WAS JUST A CHANGE OF THE
5:33:01PM SETBACKS.
5:33:02PM FOR THE RECORD, THIS IS RESIDENTIAL 10.
5:33:04PM WE HAVE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL NEARBY AS WELL AS SOME RECREATIONAL
5:33:07PM OPEN SPACE.
5:33:09PM THE ONE THING I WANT TO POINT OUT WITH THE SITE IS IT IS
5:33:13PM WITHIN THE MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE FLIGHT PATH.
5:33:16PM THAT IS A DESIGNATION ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP THAT JUST
5:33:19PM LIMITS ANY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THAT FLIGHT PATH TO 10
5:33:23PM DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE.
5:33:24PM HERE IT IS OUTLINED IN RED.
5:33:26PM THIS IS THE CLEAR ZONE AND THEN THE FLIGHT PATH.
5:33:29PM NOW, THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL TEN, SO IT'S NOT -- THIS
5:33:34PM DOESN'T REALLY AFFECT THE SITE BUT I NEED TO MENTION IT FOR
5:33:37PM THE RECORD THAT IT IS WITHIN THAT DESIGNATION.
5:33:38PM WE FOUND IT CONSISTENT AGAIN.
5:33:42PM THIS IS JUST GOING TO BE DEVELOPED OUT AT ABOUT 4.5 DWELLING
5:33:46PM UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH IS BELOW THE DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL
5:33:48PM 10.
5:33:50PM IT FOLLOWS ALL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND NO
5:33:55PM CONCERNS WITH IT.
5:33:56PM THANK YOU.
5:33:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU, JENNIFER.
5:33:58PM APPLICANT?
5:34:00PM GOOD EVENING.
5:34:05PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
5:34:06PM CAMI CORBETT WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL WARD HENDERSON
5:34:09PM REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
5:34:10PM I THINK A GIANT SCRIVENER'S ERROR IS A GOOD WAY TO EXPLAIN
5:34:13PM THIS.
5:34:13PM OUR ENGINEER OF RECORD DECIDED HE WOULD APPLY ECLECTIC
5:34:17PM SETBACKS TO THE LOTS.
5:34:18PM WE WENT TO DEVELOP AND REALIZED WE WERE REALLY SEEKING RS 50
5:34:22PM SETBACKS.
5:34:22PM ONLY TWO LOTS THAT DON'T MEET THE STANDARDS.
5:34:25PM THEY EXCEED THE STANDARDS BECAUSE WE'RE PROTECTING TREES.
5:34:28PM THERE IS ANOTHER SCRIVENER'S ERROR, TRUE SCRIVENER'S ERROR
5:34:31PM ON THE REQUEST FOR THE WAIVERS.
5:34:33PM THE WAIVER FOR THE TREES WAS 29 AND 53, SORRY, CHRIS, I
5:34:37PM DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE TO TALK TO YOU BEFORE.
5:34:39PM I REALIZED THIS AS WE WERE COMING OVER.
5:34:40PM THE WAIVER IS FOR 29 AND 53.
5:34:42PM IT IS THE SAME TREES, BUT THEY HAVE BEEN RELABELED AS 52 AND
5:34:47PM 64.
5:34:48PM I WOULD JUST LIKE TO CONFIRM WITH ERIN MAEHR BETWEEN FIRST
5:34:52PM AND SECOND READING THAT WE HAVE THE CORRECT TREES LABELED
5:34:54PM FOR THE WAIVERS.
5:34:55PM TREES 29 AND 53 DON'T ACTUALLY REQUIRE WAIVERS UNDER THE
5:35:00PM ARBORIST REPORT OF RECORD.
5:35:02PM WE WANT TO CORRECT THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
5:35:04PM OTHERWISE WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
5:35:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE QUESTIONS?
5:35:07PM ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM.
5:35:10PM MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:35:11PM SECOND FROM MANISCALCO.
5:35:13PM ALL IN FAVOR, AYE?
5:35:14PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:35:16PM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO WITH THE FIRST AND SECOND READING
5:35:19PM CHANGES.
5:35:20PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
5:35:20PM ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
5:35:23PM ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 6600,
5:35:25PM 6602, 6604, 6606, 6610, 6612, 6614, 6616 AND 6618 SOUTH
5:35:35PM STERLING AVENUE AND 6713, 6715, 6717 SOUTH HIMES AVENUE IN
5:35:41PM THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
5:35:44PM IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD, PLANNED
5:35:47PM DEVELOPMENT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
5:35:50PM SINGLE-FAMILY, DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND THE
5:35:52PM CHANGES AS MENTIONED BY THE REPRESENTATIVE BETWEEN NOW AND
5:35:55PM SECOND READING.
5:35:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:35:57PM WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:35:59PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:36:01PM ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
5:36:02PM OPPOSED?
5:36:02PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:36:04PM I KNOW COUNCILMAN MIRANDA WAS JEALOUS BECAUSE HE LIKES TO
5:36:07PM READ ALL THE NUMBERS.
5:36:09PM HE LIKES THE MOTIONS WITH ALL THE NUMBERS.
5:36:13PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING
5:36:15PM ABSENT.
5:36:15PM SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 2025,
5:36:18PM AT 10 A.M. AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR,
5:36:22PM TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
5:36:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:36:25PM ITEM NUMBER 4.
5:36:26PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
5:36:28PM CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
5:36:30PM AGENDA ITEM 4 IS REZ 25-70.
5:36:33PM REQUEST TO REZONE 703 EAST FLORIBRASKA AVENUE FROM
5:36:37PM RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RM 24 TO COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CN.
5:36:42PM THE SUBJECT SITE AS SHOWN ON THE AERIAL IS OUTLINED IN RED.
5:36:46PM IT'S LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST FLORIBRASKA AVENUE.
5:36:50PM ALSO HAS STREET FRONTAGE WHERE EAST FLORIBRASKA AVENUE
5:36:54PM INTERSECTS WITH NORTH TALIAFERRO AVENUE.
5:36:58PM THE SUBJECT SITE HAS APPROXIMATELY 7,098 SQUARE FEET IN
5:37:04PM AREA.
5:37:05PM THE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE CG ZONING TO THE NORTH,
5:37:09PM CONSISTING OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ALONG WITH RS 50
5:37:15PM ZONING TO THE SOUTH WHICH HAS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
5:37:19PM WE HAVE A VACANT PARCEL IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT
5:37:22PM SITE TO THE EAST ZONED RM 20 AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE,
5:37:27PM WE HAVE I-275 AND RS 50 ZONING CONTINUES WESTERLY.
5:37:36PM THE APPLICANT, OF COURSE, IS REQUESTING TO ALLOW THE SITE TO
5:37:38PM BE DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES.
5:37:43PM THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN GREEN.
5:37:46PM THE SUBJECT SITE HAS APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET OF STREET
5:37:50PM FRONTAGE LONG EAST FLORIBRASKA AVENUE AND 118 FEET OF
5:37:54PM FRONTAGE ALONG NORTH TALIAFERRO AVENUE.
5:38:00PM GIVING THE SURROUNDED USES, REQUESTED USE OF COMMERCIAL
5:38:03PM NEIGHBORHOOD IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION AND ALSO PROVIDES AN
5:38:06PM APPROPRIATE TRANSITION WITH SURROUNDING PARCELS.
5:38:10PM SINCE THIS IS EUCLIDEAN REZONING, WE DO NOT HAVE A SITE PLAN
5:38:13PM TO PROVIDE OR ELEVATIONS TO SHOW AS WELL.
5:38:15PM I DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:38:19PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON FLORIBRASKA AVENUE LOOKING AT THE
5:38:22PM SUBJECT SITE.
5:38:27PM THIS IS LOOKING TO THE EAST FROM NORTH TALIAFERRO AVENUE.
5:38:30PM LOOKING NORTH.
5:38:34PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:38:36PM THIS IS THE VIEW OF THE LOT TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST AND, OF
5:38:43PM COURSE, LOOKING WEST, YOU HAVE THE INTERSTATE THERE.
5:38:47PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
5:38:53PM THIS APPLICATION.
5:38:54PM WE FIND THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
5:38:56PM LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
5:38:58PM I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:38:59PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:39:01PM HEARING NONE, PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:39:08PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
5:39:10PM STAFF.
5:39:10PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
5:39:14PM IT IS DESIGNATED COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
5:39:17PM THAT IS THE PINK COLOR ON THE MAP.
5:39:20PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 20, AND THEN TO THE
5:39:23PM WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 10, BUT IT ALSO
5:39:26PM BORDERS INTERSTATE 275.
5:39:29PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE
5:39:33PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING IS A VERY
5:39:37PM NEIGHBORHOOD FRIENDLY, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES
5:39:40PM AND THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION COULD CONSIDER
5:39:44PM MUCH GREATER MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
5:39:46PM SO THERE WERE NO CONCERNS WITH THIS.
5:39:48PM THIS WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
5:39:50PM PATTERN.
5:39:51PM THE ONLY THING I NEED TO MENTION FOR THE RECORD IS IT IS IN
5:39:54PM A MIXED USE CENTER AND CORRIDOR AND AN URBAN VILLAGE.
5:39:57PM WE JUST MADE A NOTE IN OUR STAFF REPORT THAT WE WOULD HOPE
5:40:01PM THAT THOSE POLICIES ARE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING
5:40:03PM RELATED TO WALKABILITY, FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION, ET CETERA.
5:40:08PM BUT THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
5:40:10PM THANK YOU.
5:40:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:40:11PM I THOUGHT YOU WOULD TEACH US HOW TO SAY THE STREET NAME.
5:40:15PM >>LYNN HURTAK: TALIAFERRO.
5:40:17PM >> GOOD EVENING.
5:40:18PM AILEEN ROSARIO.
5:40:20PM MY CLIENT, SHE JUST PURCHASED THE LOT AND SHE WANTS TO PUT A
5:40:25PM COMMUNITY STORE THERE.
5:40:27PM THERE'S REALLY NO GOOD STORES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND SHE
5:40:30PM WANTS TO BE ABLE TO PUT A T-SHIRT SHOP, SHE'S THINKING.
5:40:34PM NEXT DOOR IS THE OTHER PIECE OF LAND SHE BOUGHT AND WANTS TO
5:40:40PM PUT A HOUSE THERE.
5:40:41PM SHE WANTS TO KEEP EVERYTHING IN THE COMMUNITY.
5:40:44PM LIVING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OVER 35 YEARS.
5:40:46PM SHE LIVES DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.
5:40:48PM SHE'S BEEN MAINTAINING IT FROM YEARS FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER
5:40:53PM PREVIOUSLY.
5:40:54PM SHE WANTS TO OPEN HER OWN BUSINESS.
5:40:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:40:57PM COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
5:40:57PM ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
5:41:00PM COME FORWARD, PLEASE.
5:41:01PM START WITH YOUR NAME.
5:41:02PM VERIFYING YOU WERE SWORN IN.
5:41:09PM >> YES, SIR.
5:41:10PM MY NAME IS KEVIN WELCH.
5:41:12PM I JUST BUILT A NEW HOUSE.
5:41:15PM I'LL GO RIGHT INTO IT.
5:41:17PM AS A MATTER OF FACT, JUST ALMOST ACROSS THE STREET ON 709
5:41:20PM EAST HUGH.
5:41:22PM BRAND-NEW HOUSE, DOMAIN HOUSE.
5:41:25PM I BUILT THE HOUSE UNDER THE CONCEPT THAT IT'S GOING TO
5:41:29PM IMPROVE.
5:41:30PM I CAN SEE VISION BECAUSE I'VE HAD OTHER HOUSES AND I CAN SEE
5:41:34PM DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT'S GOT TO BE THE RIGHT KIND OF
5:41:37PM DEVELOPMENT.
5:41:38PM BASICALLY, THAT OLD STRIP IS BLIGHTED.
5:41:41PM HOPEFULLY WITH THE RIGHT DEVELOPMENT THIS AREA WILL BLOOM.
5:41:47PM AS I SEE IT, THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WILL BE AN ASSET TO
5:41:52PM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
5:41:54PM IT'S RESIDENTIAL ALONG THERE.
5:41:56PM ONLY OTHER PLACE THAT I CAN THINK THAT HAD SOME COMMERCIAL
5:41:58PM WAS KING STATE THAT SINCE WENT OUT OF BUSINESS AND IS
5:42:02PM BOARDED UP AND FENCE AROUND IT.
5:42:05PM SO THERE'S PLENTY OF SPACE ON NEBRASKA FOR ANY COMMERCIAL
5:42:11PM DEVELOPMENT.
5:42:11PM I APPLAUD THAT, BUT RIGHT THERE, THEY WERE ALL RESIDENTIAL,
5:42:17PM AND I THINK THEY SHOULD STAY THAT WAY.
5:42:19PM JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE PUTTING A NEW DEVELOPMENT MEANS IT'S A
5:42:23PM GOOD DEVELOPMENT AND I DON'T BELIEVE THIS WOULD BE A GOOD
5:42:25PM DEVELOPMENT.
5:42:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:42:30PM ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS
5:42:32PM ITEM?
5:42:33PM APPLICANT, WOULD YOU LIKE A REBUTTAL?
5:42:35PM DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
5:42:37PM MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:42:39PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:42:40PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:42:43PM OPPOSED?
5:42:43PM AYES HAVE IT.
5:42:44PM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:42:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM NUMBER 4, REZ-25-70, AN ORDINANCE
5:42:50PM BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN
5:42:53PM ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 703
5:42:55PM EAST FLORIBRASKA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
5:42:59PM PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
5:43:02PM CLASSIFICATION RM 24, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, TO CN,
5:43:06PM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
5:43:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:43:10PM SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:43:14PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:43:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I'LL SPEAK TO THIS JUST A LITTLE BIT AND WHY
5:43:21PM I SECONDED IT.
5:43:23PM FLORIBRASKA IS CURRENTLY A RESIDENTIAL, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT
5:43:28PM THE FUTURE LAND USE, IT WON'T BE EITHER, LIKE,
5:43:34PM SINGLE-FAMILY, WE'RE LOOKING AT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
5:43:37PM IT COULD HAVE SOME POTENTIAL FURTHER ALONG, AND THAT IS WHY
5:43:40PM I SECONDED IT.
5:43:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO DISCUSS THIS ISSUE?
5:43:44PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:43:48PM OPPOSED?
5:43:48PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:43:51PM CLERK.
5:43:51PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING
5:43:54PM ABSENT.
5:43:55PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 2025,
5:43:58PM AT 10 A.M. AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR,
5:44:01PM TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
5:44:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:44:04PM ITEM NUMBER 5.
5:44:10PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT
5:44:16PM COORDINATION.
5:44:16PM AGENDA ITEM 5 IS REZ-25-74.
5:44:16PM THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 1318 WEST ARCH STREET FROM
5:44:19PM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RS-50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
5:44:24PM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED USES.
5:44:27PM LOOKING AT THE AERIAL MAP, BEFORE I JUMP INTO DETAILS, YOU
5:44:30PM MAY RECOGNIZE THIS SITE OR THE SURROUNDING AREA AS LAST
5:44:36PM MONTH THE APPLICANT BROUGHT AN APPLICATION IMMEDIATELY WEST
5:44:40PM OF THE SUBJECT SITE FOR PRETTY MUCH THE SAME PROPOSAL THAT
5:44:44PM I'M ABOUT TO GO INTO HERE.
5:44:46PM LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED, IT'S LOCATED ON
5:44:50PM THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ARCH STREET.
5:44:53PM IT IS SURROUNDED TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST BY
5:44:56PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES, ALL ZONED RS-50.
5:45:01PM I ALSO WANT TO NOTE THAT THERE ARE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
5:45:04PM ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH ORANGE AVENUE, WE DO HAVE AN RM 18
5:45:09PM AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ARCH
5:45:11PM STREET, WE DO HAVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WAS
5:45:15PM DEVELOPED WITH TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
5:45:19PM WE NEXT HAVE OUR PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
5:45:30PM THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A SINGLE STRUCTURE CONTAINING TWO
5:45:34PM SEMI DETACHED USES.
5:45:36PM THE APPLICANT PROPOSES CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE SOUTH
5:45:40PM SIDE OF WEST ARCH STREET.
5:45:42PM THE FRONT DOORS ARE ORIENTED TOWARDS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
5:45:46PM THE SITE PROVIDES REAR ENTRY VEHICULAR ACCESS OFF THE
5:45:51PM 14-FOOT ALLEYWAY.
5:45:53PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN YOU PUSH IT UP AND ZOOM IN ON THE
5:45:56PM GARAGE AND THE DRIVEWAY SECTION?
5:45:58PM MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE.
5:46:04PM THANK YOU.
5:46:11PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: EACH UNIT IS PROPOSED WITH A TOTAL
5:46:13PM FLOOR AREA OF 2,350 SQUARE FEET.
5:46:16PM NEXT I HAVE ELEVATIONS.
5:46:19PM THESE ARE THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS.
5:46:25PM THE PROPOSED HEIGHT IS 31 FEET, 9 INCHES.
5:46:29PM THERE IS A WAIVER REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
5:46:32PM IT RELATES TO A REDUCTION OF THE BACKUP DISTANCE FOR THE
5:46:35PM ALLEYWAY FROM 24 FEET TO 14 FEET.
5:46:39PM NEXT I HAVE SOME PHOTOS SHOWING THE SUBJECT SITE AND
5:46:47PM SURROUNDING AREA.
5:46:48PM THIS IS THE PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:46:51PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ACROSS WEST ARCH STREET.
5:46:55PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ON
5:46:58PM WEST NASSAU.
5:47:01PM EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:47:06PM THIS WAS THE SITE OF THE APPLICATION HEARD LAST MONTH FOR
5:47:09PM 1320 WEST ARCH STREET.
5:47:12PM LOOKING EAST DOWN WEST ARCH STREET AND LASTLY, LOOKING WEST
5:47:18PM DOWN WEST ARCH STREET.
5:47:20PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS
5:47:22PM APPLICATION.
5:47:23PM WE FIND THE REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
5:47:25PM TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
5:47:27PM SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
5:47:29PM APPLICATION, A MODIFICATION TO THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE
5:47:33PM SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND
5:47:36PM SECOND READING.
5:47:36PM THESE REVISIONS WILL NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUES OF
5:47:39PM TRANSPORTATION'S INCONSISTENT FINDING.
5:47:42PM I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:47:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:47:45PM HEARING NONE, PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:47:52PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
5:47:57PM STAFF.
5:47:57PM THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 20, AND IT IS LOCATED IN
5:48:06PM THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
5:48:10PM AS IS PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT OF A THEME TONIGHT, AS MR.
5:48:14PM DEMANCHE MENTIONED, THE STREET MIGHT HAVE A VARIETY OF
5:48:18PM RESIDENTIAL TYPES ON IT, BUT THE RESIDENTIAL 20 WOULD KIND
5:48:23PM OF ENVISION RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES,
5:48:28PM MULTIFAMILY TYPES OF USES OVER TIME, OVER THE COURSE OF THE
5:48:31PM PLAN.
5:48:31PM WE DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
5:48:35PM WE DID FIND THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS SOMETHING IN IT
5:48:39PM CALLED THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY.
5:48:41PM AND THAT IS ENCOURAGING OUR GROWTH IN OUR DENSITY NEAR
5:48:45PM EMPLOYMENT CENTERS, NEAR TRANSIT AND WITHIN OUR URBAN
5:48:49PM VILLAGES, AND THIS IS MEETING ALL OF THOSE CRITERIA.
5:48:53PM IT'S GOING TO BRING UP THE DENSITY OF THE STREET IN AN AREA
5:48:56PM OF THE CITY THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS SEEN THAT
5:49:02PM VISION.
5:49:03PM I THINK YOU GET THE IDEA.
5:49:04PM AGAIN, IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WE
5:49:08PM FOUND THAT THE DESIGN IN THE COMP PLAN ALSO PROMOTES
5:49:11PM UTILIZING THE ALLEY AS WELL FOR ACCESS.
5:49:13PM I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:49:14PM THANK YOU.
5:49:14PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY QUESTIONS?
5:49:15PM HEARING NONE.
5:49:16PM APPLICANT.
5:49:18PM >> JAMES LASCARA, I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
5:49:21PM AS CHRISTOPHER MENTIONED, THIS IS THE EXACT SAME SITE PLAN,
5:49:25PM CARBON COPY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT RECEIVED UNANIMOUS
5:49:28PM CONSENT AT THE LAST CITY COUNCIL.
5:49:30PM WE'LL HAVE THE SECOND READING FOR THAT IN ONE WEEK.
5:49:33PM SO WE'RE HAPPY TO HEAR THAT WE'RE REPORTED CONSISTENT ACROSS
5:49:38PM THE BOARD EXCEPT FOR TRANSPORTATION.
5:49:40PM THE REASON FOR THAT IS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE REDUCED PARKING
5:49:45PM SETBACK DISTANCE SO WE CAN DO A SINGLE CAR GARAGE.
5:49:51PM I WANT TO SHOW A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
5:49:53PM I LIVE TWO BLOCKS AWAY.
5:49:55PM WE LOVE DOING PROJECTS IN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD.
5:49:58PM SO LAST YEAR, WE REZONED 1505 ARCH TO SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI
5:50:04PM ATTACHED AND THAT'S BEING BUILT NOW.
5:50:06PM LAST MONTH, WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF FINALIZING REZONING FOR
5:50:10PM 1320 ARCH.
5:50:12PM IN BLUE IS THE SUBJECT SITE WE'RE DISCUSSING TONIGHT.
5:50:16PM IN ORANGE YOU'LL SEE OUR CURRENT USE PROPERTIES THAT ARE TWO
5:50:20PM UNITS.
5:50:20PM I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:50:24PM RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
5:50:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:50:27PM HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO
5:50:30PM THIS ITEM?
5:50:31PM I SEE NONE.
5:50:33PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:50:34PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:50:35PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:50:37PM OPPOSED?
5:50:37PM AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:50:39PM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
5:50:41PM DID I SKIP YOU ON ONE?
5:50:47PM 5.
5:50:52PM >>BILL CARLSON: ITEM NUMBER 5, FILE REZ-25-74, ORDINANCE
5:51:02PM BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN
5:51:04PM ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1318
5:51:08PM WEST ARCH STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE
5:51:11PM PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
5:51:14PM CLASSIFICATION RS 50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, TO PD,
5:51:17PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, SEMI
5:51:19PM DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
5:51:21PM INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET.
5:51:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
5:51:26PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:51:27PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
5:51:29PM OPPOSED?
5:51:29PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
5:51:32PM CLERK.
5:51:32PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA ABSENT.
5:51:37PM SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OCTOBER 9, 2025 AT 10 A.M. AT
5:51:40PM 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA,
5:51:43PM 33602.
5:51:45PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
5:51:45PM ITEM NUMBER 6.
5:51:46PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
5:51:48PM ITEM NUMBER 6 IS REZ-25-78.
5:51:52PM THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 801 EAST 26th AVENUE FROM
5:51:56PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL CG.
5:52:01PM WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:52:03PM SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED ON THE AERIAL HERE.
5:52:07PM IT'S LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 26th AVENUE.
5:52:11PM THE SITE TOTALS 1.83 ACRES IN AREA.
5:52:15PM SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE BORRELL PARK TO THE NORTH, ZONED
5:52:20PM CG, AS WELL AS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ZONED RS 50.
5:52:25PM EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A SCHOOL, A SINGLE-FAMILY
5:52:30PM DETACHED USE, A VACANT LOT, AND A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS
5:52:34PM ASSEMBLY OR A FORMER PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
5:52:36PM EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE ZONED
5:52:41PM CG.
5:52:41PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
5:52:44PM USES ZONED RS 50 ALONG WITH A VERY SMALL PORTION OF
5:52:48PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING THAT'S PART OF THAT PLACE OF
5:52:52PM RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY SITE.
5:52:53PM AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
5:52:58PM USES ALONG WITH SOME VACANT PARCELS AS WELL.
5:53:03PM THE SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
5:53:07PM SO IT MUST COMPLY WITH THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT
5:53:10PM DESIGN STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
5:53:13PM THE CURRENT PD APPROVED FOR THE SITE IS FOR MULTIFAMILY.
5:53:17PM IT ALLOWS A TOTAL OF 32 UNITS WITH A BONUS PROVISION
5:53:23PM AGREEMENT.
5:53:23PM THE PD DOES NOT ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES.
5:53:27PM SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THIS REZONING TO ALLOW FOR
5:53:31PM THOSE CG USES TO BE ON THIS SITE.
5:53:34PM THIS IS A SURVEY FOR THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:53:41PM WE HAVE APPROXIMATELY 212 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE ON THE
5:53:45PM SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 26th AVENUE AND 330 FEET OF DEPTH ON
5:53:51PM THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:53:51PM GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, THE REQUESTED USE OF COMMERCIAL
5:53:56PM GENERAL ZONING, ACCORDING TO STAFF IS APPROPRIATE IN
5:53:59PM LOCATION AND PROVIDES FOR AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION WITH THE
5:54:03PM SURROUNDING PARCELS.
5:54:05PM I DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS TO SHOW YOU, AS THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN
5:54:10PM REZONING, SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY SITE PLAN OR ELEVATIONS TO
5:54:13PM SHOW YOU.
5:54:14PM FIRST, WE HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE.
5:54:15PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH FROM EAST 26th AVENUE.
5:54:19PM THIS IS LOOKING IN ON THE INTERNAL TO THE SITE.
5:54:25PM ONE ADDITIONAL PHOTO SHOWING THE SITE.
5:54:30PM LOOKING NORTH TOWARDS BORRELL PARK, ONE ADDITIONAL FROM THE
5:54:35PM SUBJECT SITE LOOKING NORTH.
5:54:37PM ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS AND,
5:54:44PM OF COURSE, WE ALSO HAVE THE CG PORTION TO THE SOUTH.
5:54:52PM ALONG THE EAST, WE HAVE A PREPARATORY SCHOOL.
5:54:57PM WE ALSO HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND VACANT PARCEL.
5:55:01PM AND THEN WE START TO GET INTO THE SITE SHOWING THE PLACE OF
5:55:09PM RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
5:55:13PM AND THAT WRAPS UP OUR PHOTOS.
5:55:17PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
5:55:21PM THIS APPLICATION.
5:55:22PM WE FIND THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
5:55:24PM LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
5:55:26PM AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:55:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
5:55:29PM HEARING NONE, PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:55:32PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
5:55:37PM STAFF.
5:55:37PM THE FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
5:55:42PM IT IS BORDERED -- WELL, THIS IS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE, A
5:55:46PM TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
5:55:48PM AND WE SEE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA.
5:55:51PM THERE IS A PARK TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE AND THEN
5:55:54PM RESIDENTIAL 20 TO THE WEST.
5:55:55PM THE SITE MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU ALL.
5:55:57PM IT CAME BEFORE YOU.
5:55:58PM IT WAS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ABOUT FOUR TO FIVE
5:56:02PM MONTHS AGO, AND NOW THEY ARE HERE FOR A ZONING.
5:56:06PM THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 CATEGORY DOES SUPPORT THE ZONING
5:56:12PM OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
5:56:13PM I JUST NEED TO ADD FOR THE RECORD IT IS ALSO WITHIN THE EAST
5:56:16PM TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
5:56:18PM SINCE IT IS WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AND AN URBAN
5:56:21PM VILLAGE, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES PROMOTE WALKABILITY,
5:56:26PM WIDE SIDEWALKS, SPECIAL DESIGN FOR PEDESTRIANS, COMFORT AND
5:56:29PM SAFETY, SO WE WOULD ASK THAT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD
5:56:33PM BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT POLICY DIRECTION AT THE TIME OF
5:56:37PM PERMITTING.
5:56:38PM THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD PROMOTE A MIXTURE OF USES IN
5:56:41PM CONTEXT WITH THE COMMUNITY, ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN
5:56:43PM EXPERIENCE.
5:56:45PM AGAIN, THE SITE IS ADJACENT TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL
5:56:47PM DEVELOPMENT, A LONG TRANSIT CORRIDOR, NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE,
5:56:52PM PROPOSED CG ZONING DISTRICT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS
5:56:55PM SITE AND ANY NOT POTENTIAL NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WOULD
5:56:58PM NEED TO BE SENSITIVE TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCES ABUTTING THE
5:57:01PM SITE, BUT HAVING EUCLIDEAN, IF THEY MEET THE CODE, WE DO
5:57:06PM BELIEVE THAT WOULD OCCUR.
5:57:07PM THANK YOU.
5:57:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:57:08PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION?
5:57:09PM APPLICANT?
5:57:12PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
5:57:13PM RYAN MANASSE, JOHNSON POPE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, 400 NORTH
5:57:17PM ASHLEY DRIVE, SUITE 3100.
5:57:20PM IF CTTV COULD BRING UP MY PowerPoint, I HAVE A BRIEF
5:57:25PM PRESENTATION FOR YOU.
5:57:27PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT'S UP.
5:57:28PM >> GREAT.
5:57:28PM JUST TO GO OVER A FEW ITEMS.
5:57:30PM AGAIN, SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 26th AVENUE BETWEEN TALIAFERRO
5:57:33PM AVENUE AND NEBRASKA AVENUE, ROUGHLY 1.83 ACRES.
5:57:37PM AS CHRIS MENTIONED, IT IS ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
5:57:39PM IT WAS REZONED A FEW TIMES, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
5:57:42PM AGAIN FOR THE 32 MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
5:57:44PM OUR REQUEST IS OBVIOUSLY STATED THE CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL
5:57:48PM ZONING DISTRICT.
5:57:49PM EXISTING USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT.
5:57:52PM JUST TO ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT ON WHAT JENNIFER ALLUDED TO,
5:57:55PM ON THE FLU HISTORY, IT WAS APPROVED TO GO FROM R-20 TO CMU
5:58:00PM 35, THROUGH ORDINANCE 2025-18 OR TA/CPA 24-12.
5:58:03PM THAT WAS BEFORE YOU EARLIER THIS YEAR IN FEBRUARY.
5:58:07PM SO THIS IS THE SECOND PART OF IT.
5:58:09PM WE WANTED TO BRING THE REZONING IN FRONT OF YOU TO COME IN
5:58:13PM ALIGNMENT WITH OUR NEW FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
5:58:16PM THE ZONING MAP, CURRENTLY ZONED PD.
5:58:23PM CG DISTRICT ABUTS PROPERTY ON EAST AND PORTIONS OF THE NORTH
5:58:26PM AND SOUTH.
5:58:27PM SUBJECT SITES OUTLINED IN GREEN.
5:58:30PM CG IS PREDOMINANTLY ON BOTH SIDES OF NEBRASKA GOING NORTH
5:58:33PM AND SOUTH.
5:58:34PM THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
5:58:36PM ZONING DISTRICT.
5:58:37PM SORRY, I HAVE TO LOOK UP.
5:58:41PM IT'S NOT ON MY SCREEN.
5:58:43PM CITY STAFF FINDINGS, REQUESTED CG DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT
5:58:46PM WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA.
5:58:47PM IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ALL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES IN THE EAST
5:58:50PM TAMPA OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS AND REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
5:58:54PM FOUND OUR REQUEST CONSISTENT.
5:58:56PM SOME FINDINGS FROM THE PC, IT SUPPORTS INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON
5:58:59PM VACANT LAND.
5:59:00PM IT ALIGNS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT GOAL OF
5:59:03PM VIBRANT MIXED USE URBAN LIFESTYLE.
5:59:05PM AGAIN, LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, PROMOTING
5:59:08PM PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED COMMUNITY SERVING USES.
5:59:11PM AND IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH NEARBY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG
5:59:14PM NEBRASKA AVENUE, WHILE AS JENNIFER MENTIONED WE WOULD BE
5:59:17PM REQUIRED TO BUFFER APPROPRIATELY AND SCREEN AGAINST ANY TYPE
5:59:20PM OF RESIDENTIAL USE.
5:59:21PM AGAIN, THE REZONING IN OUR OPINION, AND IT APPEARS FROM
5:59:24PM STAFF IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE
5:59:28PM SURROUNDING USES, AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
5:59:31PM PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CMU 35 FUTURE LAND USE
5:59:35PM DESIGNATION.
5:59:36PM IN CONCLUSION, CITY OF TAMPA AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
5:59:40PM FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
5:59:42PM AGAIN, WE ALIGN WITH THE CMU 35 FLU CATEGORY.
5:59:46PM AGAIN, ANY DEVELOPMENT, AS YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT A SITE PLAN
5:59:49PM PD, SO WE MUST COMPLY WITH ALL CG STANDARDS, ALL LAND
5:59:52PM DEVELOPMENT CODES, EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS.
5:59:56PM WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD YOU HAVE
5:59:58PM ANY.
5:59:59PM I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUEST.
6:00:02PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY FROM FOUR OR FIVE
6:00:06PM MONTHS AGO, YOUR CLIENT HAS ADDITIONAL CONNECTING PARCELS TO
6:00:13PM NEBRASKA.
6:00:14PM >> THEY HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH SOME OF THOSE
6:00:17PM PROPERTY OWNERS.
6:00:18PM SO THIS WOULD BE IN LINE WITH THAT AND SETTING EVERYTHING
6:00:21PM UP, CG HELPS POSSIBLY PROMOTE.
6:00:24PM MORE OF A CONSOLIDATION.
6:00:27PM MY CLIENT DOES NOT OWN PROPERTY ON NEBRASKA.
6:00:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY.
6:00:30PM I REMEMBER THAT FROM THE CMU.
6:00:34PM THANK YOU.
6:00:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS?
6:00:36PM HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO
6:00:39PM THIS ITEM?
6:00:39PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
6:00:43PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:00:45PM ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
6:00:46PM AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
6:00:48PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:00:49PM >>LYNN HURTAK: FILE REZ 25-78, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
6:00:53PM FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
6:00:55PM IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 801 EAST 26th AVENUE, IN THE
6:00:59PM CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
6:01:02PM SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD, PLANNED
6:01:05PM DEVELOPMENT, TO CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL, PROVIDING AN
6:01:08PM EFFECTIVE DATE.
6:01:09PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:01:11PM A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:01:12PM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
6:01:15PM OPPOSED?
6:01:15PM AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
6:01:16PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA ABSENT.
6:01:20PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD OCTOBER 9, 2025 AT
6:01:23PM 10 A.M. AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA,
6:01:27PM FLORIDA, 33602.
6:01:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:01:29PM LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT.
6:01:30PM ITEM 7.
6:01:33PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
6:01:36PM NEXT WE HAVE AGENDA ITEM 7, REZ-25-80, THIS IS A REQUEST TO
6:01:40PM REZONE 801 EAST SAINT CLAIR STREET FROM RS 50, RESIDENTIAL
6:01:45PM SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
6:01:49PM WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL.
6:01:51PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED.
6:01:54PM IT IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
6:01:58PM EAST ST. CLAIR STREET AND NORTH MITCHELL AVENUE.
6:02:02PM THE SUBJECT BLOCK THAT THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON IS
6:02:05PM LOCATED BETWEEN NORTH MITCHELL AVENUE AND NORTH NEBRASKA
6:02:10PM AVENUE.
6:02:11PM SURROUNDING ZONING INCLUDES RS 50 TO THE NORTH, CONSISTING
6:02:21PM OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USE.
6:02:23PM TO THE EAST, WE HAVE RS 50 AS WELL AS THERE IS YC 5 ADJACENT
6:02:34PM TO NORTH NEBRASKA.
6:02:36PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE YC 5 AS WELL AS RS 50,
6:02:42PM AND TO THE EAST, WE HAVE CITY OF TAMPA PROPERTY THAT IS ALSO
6:02:46PM ZONED RS 50 THERE.
6:02:48PM THE SITE IS ALSO IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT, SO IT
6:02:53PM MUST MEET THOSE DESIGN STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
6:02:57PM THE SITE BASED ON THE RM 18 ZONING THEY ARE REQUESTING,
6:03:01PM ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM OF FOUR DWELLING UNITS FOR THE SITE
6:03:05PM ITSELF.
6:03:05PM NEXT WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
6:03:10PM OUTLINED IN GREEN, SUBJECT SITE HAS APPROXIMATELY 88 FEET OF
6:03:15PM STREET FRONTAGE ALONG EAST SAINT CLAIR AS WELL AS 118 FEET
6:03:20PM OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG NORTH MITCHELL AND 88 FEET OF
6:03:25PM STREET FRONTAGE ALONG EAST ROBLES STREET.
6:03:29PM GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING
6:03:35PM DISCUSSED WITH THE AERIAL MAP, WE BELIEVE RM 18 ZONING IS
6:03:39PM APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION AND ALSO PROVIDES FOR THE
6:03:42PM APPROPRIATE TRANSITION WITH THE SURROUNDING PARCELS.
6:03:45PM WE DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS SHOWING THE SUBJECT SITE.
6:03:50PM THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE FROM EAST SAINT CLAIR.
6:03:56PM LOOKING FROM THE WEST EASTERLY FROM NORTH MITCHELL, FROM THE
6:04:02PM SOUTH LOOKING NORTH FROM EAST ROBLES STREET.
6:04:05PM SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND THIS IS A PORTION OF ONE OF
6:04:13PM THE OTHER SITES TO THE SOUTH SHOWING SOME DETACHED ACCESSORY
6:04:18PM DWELLING UNITS.
6:04:20PM EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
6:04:25PM AND I DON'T BELIEVE I SHOWED NORTH.
6:04:29PM SO THERE WE GO.
6:04:30PM THERE IS NORTH WITH ANOTHER DETACHED UNIT THERE.
6:04:34PM IF THE APPLICANT'S INTENT IS TO VEST THE EXISTING USES
6:04:39PM THROUGH THIS REZONING, A DESIGN EXCEPTION WILL BE REQUIRED.
6:04:44PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
6:04:48PM APPLICATION.
6:04:48PM WE DO FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
6:04:50PM LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY
6:04:54PM QUESTIONS.
6:04:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:04:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WE RECEIVED SOME E-MAILS ABOUT CODE ISSUES.
6:05:02PM CAN YOU SPEAK AT ALL TO THAT?
6:05:05PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: THERE IS AN OPEN CODE VIOLATION FOR
6:05:06PM THE SITE RELATED TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS ON THE SITE AS IT IS
6:05:12PM ZONED CURRENTLY RS 50.
6:05:14PM SO WHEN WE WENT OUT THERE, I DID A SITE VISIT.
6:05:17PM I DID NOTICE THAT THERE WERE THREE UNITS BASED ON THE
6:05:21PM MAILBOXES ALONG EAST SAINT CLAIR.
6:05:25PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IS THERE ANYBODY FROM CODE THAT CAN SPEAK TO
6:05:27PM THAT?
6:05:27PM NO.
6:05:28PM OKAY.
6:05:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:05:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAYBE I'M WRONG, THIS LOOKS VERY
6:05:34PM FAMILIAR.
6:05:35PM IS THIS SOMETHING THAT CAME BEFORE US YEARS AGO?
6:05:37PM OKAY.
6:05:38PM I REMEMBER DURING COVID SOMETIME, MAYBE 2020, 2021,
6:05:42PM SOMETHING, MAYBE THIS IS IT.
6:05:45PM IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, IT WAS FOR A LESSER DENSITY OR
6:05:50PM DIFFERENT CATEGORY, AND IT WAS TURNED DOWN, AND NOW IT'S
6:05:54PM COMING BACK FOR MORE.
6:05:55PM I DON'T KNOW.
6:05:56PM CAN YOU CLARIFY, MS. WELLS.
6:05:58PM >>CATE WELLS: FOR THE RECORD, CATE WELLS WITH THE LEGAL
6:06:01PM DEPARTMENT.
6:06:02PM THE STAFF REPORT HAD NOTED THAT THERE WAS A REZONING.
6:06:05PM I THINK IT'S REZ 19 -- I DON'T HAVE THE REST OF THE NUMBER
6:06:08PM -- BUT IT WAS CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL BACK IN FEBRUARY 13
6:06:13PM OF 2020.
6:06:14PM AT THE TIME, THE APPLICANT WAS REQUESTING A PLANNED
6:06:18PM DEVELOPMENT REZONING THAT WOULD ALLOW UP TO THREE UNITS.
6:06:22PM SO I BELIEVE BASED ON THE SITE PLAN WE SAW THIS EVENING AND
6:06:28PM THE PICTURES -- NOT THE SITE PLAN, BECAUSE THIS IS A
6:06:31PM EUCLIDEAN ZONING, BUT THE PICTURES WE SAW, THEY ARE SEEKING
6:06:34PM ONCE AGAIN TO GET AN APPROVAL -- AND THE APPLICANT CAN
6:06:38PM CONFIRM THIS.
6:06:40PM I'M ASSUMING THEY ARE SEEKING APPROVAL TO VEST THE EXISTING
6:06:42PM STRUCTURES.
6:06:43PM THAT IS WHAT THE APPLICANT REQUESTED BACK IN 2020 WAS TO
6:06:47PM VEST THE EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THAT WAS DENIED BY COUNCIL.
6:06:50PM SINCE THEN, THERE HAD BEEN ANOTHER CODE ENFORCEMENT
6:06:55PM COMPLAINT THAT WAS INITIATED IN JANUARY OF 2024.
6:06:59PM IT WENT TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IN MAY OF 2024.
6:07:04PM THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND THAT THERE WERE PROPERTY
6:07:07PM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS THAT HAD BEEN VIOLATED.
6:07:09PM ACCUMULATIONS WERE ON THE PROPERTY, BUT ALSO FOUND A
6:07:12PM VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND THAT MORE THAN ONE UNIT WAS
6:07:16PM OPERATING FROM THOSE STRUCTURES.
6:07:18PM AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.
6:07:20PM I'VE GOT A COPY OF THE ORDER, THAT A $500 DAILY FINE IS
6:07:25PM BEING ASSESSED SINCE THIS WAS HEARD A LITTLE OVER A YEAR
6:07:28PM AGO.
6:07:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THIS APPLICATION IS HERE TO WHAT, CURE
6:07:34PM THE ZONING VIOLATION, ESSENTIALLY.
6:07:39PM >>CATE WELLS: THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO HAVE TO TESTIFY TO
6:07:42PM THAT.
6:07:42PM BUT WHAT CHRIS DID CONFIRM IS, EVEN IF CITY COUNCIL APPROVES
6:07:46PM THE RM 18 ZONING, IF THE INTENT IS VEST THE EXISTING
6:07:51PM STRUCTURES, THAT WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
6:07:55PM BECAUSE THE LOCATION, AND YOU CAN GET -- CHRIS CAN EXPLAIN
6:08:00PM --
6:08:10PM >> I'LL BE REALLY SHORT.
6:08:11PM EVERYBODY HAS A BETTER MEMORY THAN ME BECAUSE I DON'T
6:08:14PM REMEMBER THIS, BUT I WAS WORKING IN 2020.
6:08:18PM A LONG FIVE YEARS.
6:08:19PM JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:08:22PM THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
6:08:26PM IT IS IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
6:08:29PM AND TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE
6:08:32PM 35.
6:08:34PM WE DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
6:08:36PM BECAUSE THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS REVIEWING IT AS A
6:08:39PM EUCLIDEAN REQUEST.
6:08:40PM THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18 IS SUPPORTED BY THE
6:08:44PM RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, AND THOSE USES
6:08:47PM WITHIN IT.
6:08:48PM LOOKING AT IT AS EUCLIDEAN REQUEST, WE DETERMINED THAT THIS
6:08:53PM WOULD PROVIDE MORE HOUSING WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AGAIN
6:08:57PM FURTHERING THAT COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY, PROVIDING MORE
6:09:00PM HOUSING IN OUR URBAN VILLAGES, IN THE AREAS OF THE CITY THAT
6:09:03PM HAVE PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT AND SERVICES.
6:09:07PM AGAIN, THE URBAN VILLAGE SEEKS -- THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
6:09:10PM SEEKS TO -- TO THE URBAN VILLAGES AND THAT IS WHERE THIS
6:09:15PM LIES.
6:09:16PM THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
6:09:17PM THANK YOU.
6:09:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION?
6:09:19PM APPLICANT?
6:09:22PM >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
6:09:23PM AILEEN ROSARIO.
6:09:25PM SO MY CLIENT PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO.
6:09:29PM OF COURSE, THERE IS SOME CODE VIOLATION CASES.
6:09:33PM THE CODE VIOLATION, ONE OF THE ONES HE'S TRYING TO RESOLVE
6:09:36PM RIGHT NOW IS BECAUSE OF THE CODE, RS 50.
6:09:40PM WHEN HE PURCHASED IT, THREE APARTMENTS WERE ALREADY THERE.
6:09:43PM WE THEN WANT TO MAKE IT LEGAL.
6:09:47PM NOT TRYING TO ADD NOTHING ELSE.
6:09:49PM NOT TRYING TO DO NOTHING ELSE.
6:09:51PM SO THAT ZONING, THAT CODE VIOLATION FOR THE ZONING WILL GO
6:09:55PM AWAY, BECAUSE HE KEEPS GETTING VIOLATIONS BECAUSE IT IS RS
6:09:58PM 50.
6:09:59PM BUT IF WE MAKE IT RM 18 AND LEAVE IT WITH THE THREE UNITS
6:10:02PM THAT'S ALREADY THERE, JUST DO SOME IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE
6:10:05PM BUILDING PERMITS, THAT'S ALL WE WANT TO DO.
6:10:07PM WE DON'T WANT TO ADD ANYTHING.
6:10:08PM DON'T WANT TO TAKE NOTHING AWAY.
6:10:10PM JUST MAKE IT LEGAL, CORRECT ZONING AS TO WHAT IT IS.
6:10:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:10:17PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IS THE INTENT TO VEST THE TWO STRUCTURES?
6:10:20PM >> YES, I WILL DO A FORMAL DECISION TO VEST -- GET THE
6:10:24PM PROPERTY VESTED AS IS.
6:10:26PM >>LYNN HURTAK: NOW, DO THE EXISTING STRUCTURES AS LOCATED,
6:10:32PM DO THEY COMPLY WITH RM 18 SETBACKS?
6:10:35PM >> YES.
6:10:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: OR STANDARDS.
6:10:37PM SETBACKS, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
6:10:39PM >> YES, AS OF RIGHT NOW, YES.
6:10:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU.
6:10:45PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE'LL GET -- I'LL GET CLARIFICATION FOR
6:10:48PM THAT IN ONE MOMENT.
6:10:49PM DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD?
6:10:53PM YOU'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL.
6:10:56PM >> NO, THANK YOU.
6:10:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FOR OUR CITY STAFF, CAN YOU COME UP AND
6:10:58PM ADDRESS THE SETBACK ISSUE, PLEASE?
6:11:04PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: FOR THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY, FOR THE
6:11:06PM FRONT SETBACKS, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT BETWEEN 15 AND 25
6:11:10PM FEET.
6:11:11PM WITH THIS PARTICULAR SITE, I'M GOING TO BRING UP THE OLD
6:11:15PM SITE PLAN THAT WE USED BACK IN 2020 JUST AS A REFERENCE.
6:11:20PM WHEN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY, THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MEET
6:11:25PM BETWEEN 15 TO 25 ALONG THE ROADWAY, BOTH ALONG SAINT CLAIR
6:11:31PM STREET AND EAST ROBLES STREET.
6:11:35PM THERE'S ALSO EAST TAMPA REQUIRES FIVE FOOT SETBACKS ALONG
6:11:41PM THE SIDES, FIVE FOOT SETBACKS FOR CORNER SITES, WHICH WOULD
6:11:46PM BE ALONG NORTH MITCHELL, WHICH THEY MORE THAN MEET, AND
6:11:50PM THERE IS A 15-FOOT REAR SETBACK THAT IS A REQUIREMENT IN THE
6:11:54PM EAST TAMPA OVERLAY.
6:11:55PM LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN, OBVIOUSLY, THEY WOULD HAVE TO
6:12:06PM SUBMIT A DESIGN EXCEPTION, SPECIFYING THEIR DISTANCES, BUT
6:12:13PM STAFF TAKING A LOOK AT THIS, THERE'S CURRENTLY A 7-FOOT,
6:12:19PM ALMOST 3-INCH SETBACK FOR THAT PORCH BETWEEN THE EDGE OF
6:12:24PM THAT PORCH AND EAST SAINT CLAIR STREET.
6:12:29PM AND ESTIMATED SETBACK BETWEEN THE DETACHED ACCESSORY
6:12:33PM DWELLING UNIT AND EAST ROBLES STREET OF SEVEN FEET, SIX
6:12:39PM INCHES.
6:12:39PM SO THEY WOULD NEED TO GET THOSE DECREASED SETBACKS THAT
6:12:45PM EXIST ON THE SITE, THEY WOULD NEED TO BRING THOSE IN FOR
6:12:48PM DESIGN EXCEPTION.
6:12:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THOSE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS COULD BE DONE
6:12:51PM WITHOUT COUNCIL APPROVAL.
6:12:52PM COULD BE DONE WITH STAFF IF THIS ACTION WAS APPROVED THIS
6:12:55PM EVENING.
6:12:56PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: CORRECT.
6:12:57PM THEY WOULD BRING IT UNDER ONE REQUEST.
6:12:59PM THEY COULD DO BOTH THE SETBACKS UNDER ONE DESIGN EXCEPTION
6:13:03PM SUBMITTAL.
6:13:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MS. WELLS, I HAVE A QUESTION.
6:13:05PM I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE LEGAL STANDARD OF USING THIS
6:13:14PM EUCLIDEAN REZONING AND THE IMPACT THAT IT HAS ON EXISTING
6:13:19PM CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES.
6:13:22PM WOULD THIS BE A PROPER WAY TO CURE ZONING ISSUES?
6:13:26PM AND WOULD IT ELIMINATE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER FOR
6:13:33PM ISSUES THAT HAD BEEN ACCUMULATED TO DATE?
6:13:36PM >>CATE WELLS: CATE WELLS, FOR THE RECORD.
6:13:38PM SO THE REQUESTED RM 18 ZONING, STAFF HAS CONFIRMED THAT THAT
6:13:45PM ALLOWS UP TO FOUR DWELLING UNITS ON THE PARCEL.
6:13:51PM WHAT I'VE HEARD THE APPLICANT TESTIFY TO IS THAT THEY ARE
6:13:55PM OPERATING THREE UNITS FROM THE TWO STRUCTURES THAT ARE ON
6:14:00PM THE SITE AS LONG AS YOU HAVE NO MORE THAN THE THREE THAT ARE
6:14:07PM BEING OPERATED OR THE FOUR THAT YOU COULD IF THE REZONING IS
6:14:10PM APPROVED, THEN THE ZONING ITSELF WOULD RESOLVE THAT PORTION
6:14:13PM OF IT.
6:14:14PM HOWEVER, CHRIS HAS TESTIFIED THAT TO VEST THE EXISTING
6:14:19PM STRUCTURES, THERE ARE STILL ADDITIONAL STEPS BECAUSE OF THE
6:14:22PM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
6:14:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I'M CURIOUS, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUE,
6:14:26PM THE APPLICANT ALSO TESTIFIED THEY ARE GETTING $500 PER DAY
6:14:30PM FINES FOR CODE VIOLATIONS.
6:14:32PM WITH COUNCIL'S ACTION TODAY, WOULD THAT NEGATE PREVIOUSLY
6:14:37PM ACCUMULATED FINES?
6:14:38PM >>CATE WELLS: IT DOESN'T NEGATE WHAT IS ACCUMULATED TO DATE.
6:14:43PM THE REZONING IS APPROVED, THEY WOULD THEN HAVE TO GO BACK
6:14:46PM BEFORE CODE ENFORCEMENT TO CONFIRM THAT THEY HAVE COME INTO
6:14:49PM COMPLIANCE.
6:14:49PM AT THAT POINT, THE FINE WOULD STOP, AND IT WOULD THEN BE
6:14:53PM DETERMINED WHAT THAT TOTAL FINE IS.
6:14:55PM AND I DON'T KNOW THE EXTENT OF WHICH THAT FINE COULD
6:14:59PM POTENTIALLY BE SETTLED.
6:15:01PM I'M NOT FAMILIAR ENOUGH WITH THAT PROCESS.
6:15:03PM THE REZONING ITSELF WOULD ALLOW, IF IT'S APPROVED, WOULD
6:15:07PM ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO GO BACK TO CODE ENFORCEMENT AND TO
6:15:10PM SHOW THAT THEY ARE NOW IN COMPLIANCE.
6:15:12PM BUT IT WOULD NOT NEGATE THE FINES THAT HAVE ACCUMULATED
6:15:16PM SINCE MAY OF 2024.
6:15:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANOTHER QUESTION FOR CITY STAFF.
6:15:21PM SO THIS APPLICATION HAD BEEN HEARD IN A DIFFERENT WAY FROM
6:15:25PM RS 50 TO PD IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
6:15:29PM >> CORRECT.
6:15:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE FACTS SURROUNDING THE CASE, ARE THEY
6:15:32PM ANY DIFFERENT FROM THE PREVIOUS DENIAL WHEN IT WAS DENIED BY
6:15:34PM COUNCIL?
6:15:34PM IS WHAT IS HAPPENING -- WHAT HAS CHANGED FROM THE FIRST
6:15:39PM HEARING --
6:15:43PM >>CATE WELLS: IF I MAY SUGGEST, THAT WOULD BE A GREAT
6:15:45PM QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
6:15:46PM WHAT HAS CHANGED SINCE BETWEEN 2025 AND NOW THAT WOULD
6:15:50PM JUSTIFY THE REQUEST.
6:15:51PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:15:51PM I WILL FOLLOW THAT LEGAL ADVICE.
6:15:53PM APPLICANT.
6:15:54PM COULD YOU EXPLAIN TO ME WHY WE'RE HERE AGAIN.
6:15:58PM >> AT THAT POINT, BACK IN 2024, IT WAS A DIFFERENT OWNER.
6:16:04PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHAT'S DIFFERENT -- REGARDLESS OF THE
6:16:07PM OWNERSHIP, THE PROPERTY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PROPERTY, NOT
6:16:09PM OWNERSHIP.
6:16:10PM WITH THE APPLICATION ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, IF YOUR
6:16:14PM REQUEST FOR THE REZONING FROM THE PREVIOUS TIME COUNCIL
6:16:17PM HEARD THIS CASE TO TODAY, WHAT FACTS HAVE CHANGED THAT WOULD
6:16:21PM DEMAND COMING TO COUNCIL ASKING FOR ANOTHER APPROVAL?
6:16:25PM >> THE REASON WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR THIS IS BECAUSE WE DON'T
6:16:28PM WANT TO DO PD.
6:16:29PM I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE OTHER PERSON WANTED TO DO, WHY THEY
6:16:32PM REQUESTED A PD.
6:16:33PM DID THEY NOT REALIZE THE FUTURE LAND USE?
6:16:36PM WHAT WAS IT THEY WANTED TO DO?
6:16:40PM MY PROPERTY OWNER BOUGHT THE LAND.
6:16:43PM HE WENT TO THE HEARING OR HE HEARD ABOUT THE HEARING.
6:16:45PM HE WENT TO CODE ENFORCEMENT.
6:16:46PM HE FOUND OUT THERE IS A FINE GOING ON.
6:16:48PM HE'S NOW TRYING TO SAY, OKAY, I CAN'T -- THIS IS HOW IT'S
6:16:52PM BEEN RUNNING.
6:16:53PM THERE ARE PEOPLE LIVING HERE ALREADY.
6:16:54PM I NEED TO TRY TO GET THIS LEGAL.
6:16:56PM IF I CHANGE THE ZONING BACK TO SOMETHING MULTI, WHICH FALLS
6:17:00PM WITHIN THE R-20, THEN I CAN GO BACK TO CODE, FIX THAT, THAT
6:17:05PM PART OF IT GETS FIXED.
6:17:06PM THEN WE CAN GO TO BUILDING PERMIT AND DO DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
6:17:11PM OR PUT IN A FENCE, WHATEVER THE NEXT STEPS NEED TO BE TO
6:17:15PM FINISH WITH THE COMPLIANCE.
6:17:17PM IT'S GOT TO GET STARTED IN ONE PLACE.
6:17:21PM THE FIRST THING THAT HAS TO GET DONE, GOT TO HAVE THE
6:17:24PM CORRECT ZONING.
6:17:25PM IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE CORRECT ZONING, CAN'T MOVE FORWARD
6:17:27PM WITH ANYTHING ELSE.
6:17:30PM THAT'S ONE OF THE VIOLATIONS.
6:17:32PM THAT'S THE REASON FOR ONE OF THE VIOLATIONS BECAUSE THE
6:17:34PM ZONING IS NOT CORRECT.
6:17:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:17:35PM I UNDERSTAND.
6:17:36PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:17:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT STILL DOESN'T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, WHAT
6:17:39PM HAS CHANGED ON -- WHAT HAS CHANGED FROM THE DESIRE FOR THE
6:17:45PM REZONING FOR THAT REASON TO MAKE IT MULTIFAMILY?
6:17:49PM WHAT HAS CHANGED?
6:17:51PM >> WE HAVE PEOPLE LIVING IN THERE.
6:17:52PM THERE ARE A LOT OF RESIDENTS THAT NEED HOMES.
6:17:54PM THERE ARE PEOPLE LIVING IN THERE.
6:17:55PM AND THIS IS GIVING -- IT'S GIVING THE PROPERTY TO BECOME
6:17:59PM LEGAL AND ALSO GIVING PEOPLE SOMEPLACE TO LIVE.
6:18:01PM UNDERSTANDABLE THAT THE NEW LANDLORD, THE NEW OWNER, HE'S A
6:18:12PM LITTLE BIT ON THE WOO-WOO SIDE.
6:18:15PM I'M TRYING TO PULL HIM IN, GOT TO DO THIS LEGAL.
6:18:18PM GOT TO GET IT TO THE LEGAL SIDE SO WE CAN COMPLY WITH
6:18:22PM EVERYTHING ELSE.
6:18:22PM AFTER THIS, WE'LL APPLY FOR THE D.E.
6:18:25PM APPLY FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE SETBACKS.
6:18:27PM I WILL THEN DO A FORMAL DECISION.
6:18:30PM BUT IT HAS TO BE ONE STEP AT A TIME.
6:18:32PM I CAN'T SUBMIT REZONING FOR DECISION DE-1 TO KNOW WHERE I'M
6:18:37PM GOING TO BE.
6:18:37PM I HAVE TO TAKE IT ONE STEP AT A TIME.
6:18:39PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WHY ARE YOU ASKING FOR FOUR DWELLING UNITS?
6:18:43PM >> NO ONLY GOING TO SAY STAY AT 3.
6:18:45PM IT CAN GO UP TO FOUR.
6:18:48PM IT'S STAYING JUST THE WAY IT IS.
6:18:50PM 3.
6:18:50PM NOTHING ELSE.
6:18:51PM NOTHING MORE.
6:18:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HEARING NO OTHER QUESTIONS, IS THERE
6:18:54PM ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
6:18:57PM I DON'T BELIEVE YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
6:18:59PM JUST THE ONE OR BOTH OF YOU GOING TO SPEAK?
6:19:01PM IF YOU WOULD STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
6:19:04PM YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN SWORN IN.
6:19:06PM IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN SWORN IN, STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT
6:19:09PM HAND TO BE SWORN IN.
6:19:10PM [OATH ADMINISTERED]
6:19:14PM PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM AND START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
6:19:21PM >> KIM HEADLAND.
6:19:23PM I RESIDE AT 1023 EAST 17th AVENUE.
6:19:26PM I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD
6:19:30PM ASSOCIATION.
6:19:31PM I CURRENTLY SERVE AS PRESIDENT.
6:19:33PM OUR ASSOCIATION HAS VOTED TO OPPOSE THIS REQUEST AND
6:19:36PM RESPECTFULLY URGE THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE PROPOSED
6:19:39PM REZONING.
6:19:40PM THIS REQUEST, QUITE HONESTLY, IS INCONSISTENT WITH A LOT OF
6:19:44PM VM YBOR'S HISTORIC FABRIC AND THE CHARACTER OF OUR
6:19:48PM NEIGHBORHOOD, SPECIFICALLY OUTSIDE OF THOSE MAJOR CORRIDORS.
6:19:52PM AND, QUITE HONESTLY, THIS APPLICATION IS HERE AS WE ALREADY
6:19:56PM HEARD, BECAUSE IT WAS CITED BY CODE ENFORCEMENT.
6:19:59PM APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION WOULD CONTRADICT ZONING INTENT
6:20:05PM IN THE RS 50 DESIGNATION, AND THE RS 50 DESIGNATION
6:20:10PM CURRENTLY REFLECTS THE PREVAILING PATTERN OF SINGLE-FAMILY
6:20:13PM HOMES IN THE AREA, SET BACK IN MORE THAN A BLOCK OF NEBRASKA
6:20:18PM AVENUE.
6:20:18PM FOUR DWELLING UNITS ON THIS LOT, WHICH NO MATTER WHAT THE
6:20:22PM OWNER SAYS THEY WANT TO DO, THEY WILL BE ALLOWED AT THIS
6:20:25PM POINT TO HAVE FOUR DWELLING UNITS IF APPROVED.
6:20:28PM THAT WOULD REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 9, I BELIEVE, OFF-STREET
6:20:31PM PARKING SPACES, WHICH CAN'T BE ACCOMMODATED WITHOUT A
6:20:36PM SIGNIFICANT DISRUPTION TO OUR KIND OF URBAN PATTERN, OUR
6:20:39PM URBAN FABRIC OF OUR COMMUNITY.
6:20:43PM THAT'S NINE PARKING SPACES ON A 118 BY 88-FOOT LOT.
6:20:48PM THAT IS A BIG DEVIATION.
6:20:49PM THE EXISTING SECONDARY STRUCTURE ALSO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH
6:20:52PM THE REQUIRED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS.
6:20:54PM THE OWNER OR THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN IN REPEATED
6:21:00PM NONCOMPLIANCE FOR AT LEAST A DECADE.
6:21:03PM I'VE LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR JUST ABOUT 25 YEARS NOW.
6:21:07PM I CAN SAY IT'S BEEN A CONSTANT KIND OF PROBLEM AREA OR
6:21:13PM PROBLEM PROPERTY.
6:21:14PM IT'S BEEN SAID ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS FOR BEING USED AS AN
6:21:19PM UNPERMITTED ROOMING HOUSE FOR THIS BEING SUBDIVIDED WITHOUT
6:21:23PM PERMIT INTO MULTIPLE UNITS.
6:21:27PM AND MOST RECENTLY, BOTH IN 2023 AND IN 2024, IT WAS BROUGHT
6:21:32PM BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND FINED FOR VIOLATIONS.
6:21:36PM THERE'S BEEN A CLEAR PATTERN OF DISREGARD FOR ZONING AND
6:21:41PM CODE REQUIREMENTS, QUITE HONESTLY.
6:21:46PM APPROVAL OF THIS TODAY WOULD NOT ONLY REWARD PERSISTENT
6:21:51PM NONCOMPLIANCE, BUT ALSO SET AN UNFORTUNATE PRECEDENT, I
6:21:55PM THINK, FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
6:21:56PM THANK YOU.
6:21:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:21:57PM NEXT.
6:21:58PM START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
6:22:01PM >> KELLY GRIMSDALE, 2701 NORTH 9th STREET.
6:22:07PM I'M HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT 801 EAST SAINT CLAIR.
6:22:10PM THIS PROPERTY HAS A LONG STORIED HISTORY, INCLUDING BEING
6:22:12PM LEFT OPEN AND VACANT FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS, ATTRACTING
6:22:16PM HOMELESS, SQUATTING, AND OTHER SUNDRY ACTIVITIES.
6:22:19PM DUE TO THIS, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS ALWAYS KEPT AN EYE ON THIS
6:22:19PM PROPERTY.
6:22:20PM WHEN THE PREVIOUS OWNER PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN 2018, HE
6:22:22PM LEASED IT TO HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS WHO BASICALLY USED
6:22:25PM THE PROPERTY AS AN ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE.
6:22:28PM THERE WERE MULTIPLE CODE CASES ABOUT THE ILLEGAL USE OVER
6:22:30PM THE YEARS.
6:22:32PM IN 2020, THAT PARTICULAR OWNER REQUESTED THAT THE PROPERTY
6:22:34PM BE REZONED TO MULTIFAMILY.
6:22:37PM I GUESS IT WAS IN A PD AS HE WANTED TO USE THE OUT BUILDING
6:22:41PM AS A LEGAL THIRD UNIT.
6:22:42PM BECAUSE HE COULDN'T PROVIDE ENOUGH PARKING AND DUE TO OTHER
6:22:44PM ISSUES I DON'T RECALL, CITY COUNCIL REJECTED HIS REQUEST AND
6:22:47PM THE CITY ATTORNEY CONFIRMED, I THINK IT WAS THE CITY
6:22:50PM ATTORNEY OR ONE OF THE PLANNING PEOPLE, SOMEONE SITTING OVER
6:22:53PM HERE GOT UP AND SAID THEY CONFIRMED AT THAT TIME THAT THE
6:22:56PM ONLY LEGAL USE OF THE PROPERTY WAS SINGLE-FAMILY.
6:22:59PM FAST-FORWARD TO JUNE 2023 WHEN THE CURRENT OWNER PURCHASED
6:23:02PM THE PROPERTY AND CONTINUED TO USE THE MAIN STRUCTURE AS AN
6:23:05PM ILLEGAL DUPLEX AND THEN ALSO RENTED OUT THE OUT BUILDING AS
6:23:08PM A THIRD UNIT.
6:23:09PM THEY WENT BEFORE A CODE MAGISTRATE IN MAY OF 2024 WHICH KIM
6:23:13PM AND I WERE THERE.
6:23:14PM THERE WAS NO OWNER REPRESENTATIVE THERE, AND SO THAT IS A
6:23:17PM LIE.
6:23:18PM AND THE OWNER WAS FOUND GUILTY FOR BEING IN VIOLATION OF THE
6:23:22PM CURRENT ZONING AND THEY WERE ORDERED TO PAY A FINE PER DAY.
6:23:25PM I THOUGHT IT WAS A THOUSAND DOLLARS, BUT APPARENTLY 500.
6:23:28PM OWNER CONTINUED TO OPERATE THE PROPERTY AS THREE UNITS SINCE
6:23:31PM THEN, TOTALLY DISMISSING THE MAGISTRATE'S JUDGMENT.
6:23:34PM THE PROPERTY IS ALSO KEPT IN A LESS THAN DESIRABLE
6:23:38PM CONDITION.
6:23:39PM THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
6:23:43PM NOT MUCH BETTER THAN WHEN IT WAS HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS.
6:23:46PM NOW THE OWNER IS REQUESTING A CHANGE OF USE FROM THREE, AND
6:23:51PM THERE'S SOME COLLECTION OF DEBRIS ON THE PROPERTY.
6:23:54PM THE OWNER IS REQUESTING A CHANGE OF USE FROM THREE TO FOUR
6:23:58PM UNITS.
6:23:59PM THAT'S WHAT IS ON THE APPLICATION WITH REDUCED PARKING, EVEN
6:24:02PM THOUGH ANY MORE THAN ONE UNIT WAS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY
6:24:05PM CODE.
6:24:06PM IF APPROVED, IT WILL ONLY PROVIDE A GREEN LIGHT FOR
6:24:08PM INVESTORS TO FLOUT THE CITY CODES KNOWING THEY CAN STILL BE
6:24:11PM REWARDED AT THE END OF THE DAY.
6:24:13PM IT'S INTERESTING THAT NONE OF THE UNSCRUPULOUS OWNERS OF THE
6:24:17PM DERELICT PROPERTIES ACTUALLY LIVES THERE.
6:24:20PM AS SOMEONE WHO LIVES AND INVESTS IN VM YBOR AND DONE NOTHING
6:24:24PM BUT IMPROVE MY PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING AREA, THINK OF
6:24:28PM US, THE RESIDENTS.
6:24:28PM I'M ASKING YOU TO REJECT THIS REQUEST.
6:24:31PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: APPLICANT, WOULD YOU LIKE -- WE HAVE ONE
6:24:35PM MORE.
6:24:38PM >> THEY SAID IT WELL.
6:24:39PM WHAT CAN I SAY MORE?
6:24:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: STATE YOUR NAME AGAIN.
6:24:43PM >> KEVIN WELCH.
6:24:43PM 709 EAST HUGH, WHICH IS ABOUT TWO BLOCKS FROM THIS PROPERTY.
6:24:47PM I WOULD WALK MY DOG BY THERE.
6:24:50PM ACTUALLY, TWO YEARS AGO, WHEN I BUILT MY HOUSE, THAT PLACE
6:24:53PM WAS BOARDED UP.
6:24:54PM I THOUGHT IT WAS A TEARDOWN.
6:24:56PM THEN ONE DAY TAKING THE BOARDS OUT AND CLEANING IT UP A
6:25:00PM LITTLE BIT, BY THE WAY, WHOEVER TOOK THOSE PICTURES, I GIVE
6:25:03PM THEM KUDOS BECAUSE IT IS VERY WELL PHOTO SHOPPED.
6:25:07PM THE BEST I'VE EVER SEEN WALKING MY DOG.
6:25:10PM IT'S PRETTY TRAGIC MOST OF THE TIME.
6:25:12PM WHAT I'M SAYING HERE IS, I THOUGHT IT WAS A TEARDOWN.
6:25:15PM IT'S BEEN NOTHING BUT PROBLEM, CARS, PEOPLE, THIS, THAT AND
6:25:20PM THE OTHER.
6:25:20PM I TRY TO KEEP WITH MYSELF WITH MY DOG.
6:25:23PM I DON'T WANT TO START ANY TROUBLE.
6:25:24PM I AGREE WITH THE LADIES.
6:25:26PM 100% BEHIND THEM.
6:25:27PM IT'S NOT GOOD FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:25:29PM TRUST ME.
6:25:30PM THANK YOU.
6:25:30PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:25:31PM APPLICANT, WOULD YOU LIKE REBUTTAL?
6:25:40PM >> I CAN RELATE TO WHAT THE LADIES ARE SAYING.
6:25:42PM I UNDERSTAND.
6:25:43PM THEY LIVE IN THIS AREA AND THEY WANT EVERYTHING TO BE NICE
6:25:45PM AND NEAT.
6:25:46PM BUT I ALSO DROVE UP AND DOWN THAT AREA, IN THAT
6:25:51PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:25:51PM I UNDERSTAND THE HOUSE DOESN'T LOOK 100%.
6:25:55PM IT IS MOTT THE MOST PRETTIEST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK.
6:25:58PM I HAVE TO GIVE IT TO THEM.
6:25:59PM WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT THIS GENTLEMAN PURCHASED THIS.
6:26:04PM HE WANTS TO MAKE IT RIGHT.
6:26:05PM HE'S TRYING TO FIX THE PROBLEM.
6:26:07PM IF WE CAN'T FIX THE PROBLEM IF WE DON'T GET APPROVAL.
6:26:12PM YOU CAN'T FIX THE CODE VIOLATION, YOU CAN'T FIX THE
6:26:15PM PROPERTY, YOU CAN'T FIX WHO YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO RENT TO
6:26:18PM BECAUSE YOU GOT TO START FROM SOMEWHERE.
6:26:20PM STARTING FROM SOMEWHERE IS TRYING TO FIX THIS ZONING.
6:26:22PM THE HOUSE HAS BEEN THERE SINCE 1925.
6:26:25PM THE SECOND WAS THERE SINCE 1965.
6:26:29PM HE DIDN'T MAKE THESE SETBACKS.
6:26:31PM HE DIDN'T JUST PLACE THEM THERE.
6:26:32PM THEY HAVE BEEN THERE BEFORE THE CODE WAS EVEN IN EFFECT.
6:26:35PM ALL WE CAN DO IS TRY TO FIX IT SO WE CAN COMPLY SO WE CAN
6:26:40PM MOVE FORWARD.
6:26:41PM IF WE DON'T GIVE EACH OTHER A CHANCE, THERE'S NO WAY IT WILL
6:26:45PM EVER GET FIXED.
6:26:46PM THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
6:26:48PM THANK YOU.
6:26:50PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY.
6:26:51PM VERY GOOD.
6:26:52PM CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
6:26:53PM MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:26:55PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:26:56PM DO YOU MIND IF I START ON THIS ONE?
6:27:02PM AS CHAIR, I DON'T SPEAK FIRST, BUT I HAVE TO SAY THAT THE
6:27:05PM ARGUMENTS THAT THEY CAN'T BE IN COMPLIANCE ARE SO
6:27:09PM DISINGENUOUS BECAUSE THERE IS AN EXISTING STANDARD FOR
6:27:13PM COMPLIANCE FOR THIS PROPERTY THAT THE OWNER APPEARS TO HAVE
6:27:16PM COMPLETELY IGNORED FROM THE TIME HE'S HAD -- I WON'T SPEAK
6:27:19PM TO THE PREVIOUS OWNERS.
6:27:20PM BUT SINCE THIS PERSON HAD OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY HE'S HAD
6:27:23PM AMPLE OPPORTUNITY AND BASED ON THE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED
6:27:26PM TONIGHT, MAGISTRATE BASICALLY INSTRUCTED HIM ON WHAT TO DO
6:27:30PM TO BE IN COMPLIANCE AND GIVEN A FINE AS INCENTIVE TO COME
6:27:34PM INTO COMPLIANCE.
6:27:35PM IT'S NOT THAT HE CAN'T.
6:27:37PM CHOSEN NOT TO.
6:27:38PM HE CHOSE TO CONTINUE TO UTILIZE THIS PROPERTY IN A WAY
6:27:41PM THAT'S NOT ACCOMMODATED BY CURRENT LAW.
6:27:44PM THAT IS THE STATE OF THE FACT OF WHERE WE ARE TONIGHT WHEN
6:27:50PM EVALUATING THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL.
6:27:52PM WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED IS THE APPLICANT COULD HAVE COME
6:27:55PM INTO COMPLIANCE AND THEN COME INTO THIS COUNCIL AND
6:28:00PM REQUESTED AFTER IT BEING IN COMPLIANCE, AN APPROPRIATE,
6:28:04PM EITHER ADAPTIVE REUSE OR AN APPLICATION FOR REPURPOSING THIS
6:28:08PM PROPERTY AND STARTING WITH THE CLEAN SLATE, BUT THAT'S NOT
6:28:11PM WHAT THEY CHOSE TO DO.
6:28:12PM REPEATED VIOLATIONS.
6:28:14PM IT'S COME BEFORE COUNCIL ALREADY ONCE BEFORE.
6:28:17PM BEEN GIVEN AN ANSWER OF NO.
6:28:19PM HASN'T APPRECIABLY CHANGED.
6:28:24PM WENT TO DAD ONCE, GOING TO MOM ASKING FOR A DIFFERENT
6:28:29PM ANSWER.
6:28:29PM THAT SEEMS OUTRAGEOUS TO ME.
6:28:31PM I COULD NOT SEE IN A MILLION YEARS WHY EVEN A SHRED OF
6:28:34PM COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT I WOULD CHANGE A
6:28:37PM PREVIOUS DECISION FROM COUNCIL OR BASED ON THE EVIDENCE,
6:28:39PM COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT I'VE HEARD TONIGHT, NOT
6:28:42PM ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT I WOULD MAKE A DECISION TO DO
6:28:45PM ANYTHING OTHER THAN DENY THIS REQUEST.
6:28:46PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:28:51PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I AGREE.
6:28:53PM I'LL BE A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC.
6:28:58PM THE APPLICANT HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE IT COMPLIANT
6:29:02PM AND COMPLIANCE WITH SINGLE-FAMILY.
6:29:04PM AND THAT IS WHAT THEY CHOSE NO TO DO.
6:29:07PM THAT'S THE PROBLEM.
6:29:08PM I THINK, AGAIN -- YEAH, I MEAN, I'LL SIMPLY LEAVE IT AT
6:29:19PM THAT.
6:29:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK?
6:29:21PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE APPLICANT HAD A CHANCE, WHEN HE
6:29:24PM BOUGHT THE UNITS, HE UNDERSTOOD WHAT WAS THERE AND DIDN'T
6:29:26PM TAKE CARE OF IT.
6:29:27PM NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
6:29:34PM >>BILL CARLSON: IN LINE WITH WHAT MY COLLEAGUE SAID, WE HAVE
6:29:38PM AN ONGOING SITUATION WHERE PEOPLE DO THINGS THEY SHOULDN'T
6:29:43PM DO WITH THE ZONING THEY HAVE AND EITHER THEY OR THE
6:29:46PM FOLLOWING OWNERS COME BACK AND ASK FOR IT TO BE CHANGED.
6:29:49PM THAT'S NOT WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND OTHER FOLKS SIGNED UP
6:29:53PM FOR.
6:29:53PM WE SHOULDN'T REWARD PEOPLE CHANGING THINGS THAT THEY
6:29:56PM SHOULDN'T BE CHANGING.
6:29:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU.
6:29:58PM WHO WANTS TO TAKE A STAB AT THIS?
6:30:01PM GOT TO HAVE SOMEBODY.
6:30:03PM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, I'LL TAG YOU.
6:30:22PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: ALSO, COUNCIL, I WOULD RECOMMEND IF YOU DO
6:30:25PM DENY IT, THAT YOU STATE THE -- IF THERE'S ANY ADDITIONAL
6:30:31PM FACTUAL EVIDENCE YOU WANT IN THE RECORD, BASE IT ON THE
6:30:34PM DISCUSSION, IF YOU COULD INCLUDE THAT AS PART OF WHATEVER
6:30:37PM MOTION YOU CHOOSE.
6:30:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LET'S TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK SO YOU CAN
6:30:40PM GO THROUGH THAT AND MAYBE TALK WITH ATTORNEY SHELBY.
6:30:42PM FIVE-MINUTE BREAK.
6:30:43PM WE'LL RECONVENE AT 6:36.
6:30:45PM [BREAK]
06:37:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CALL IT BACK TO ORDER.
06:37:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
06:37:51PM >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
06:37:53PM >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
06:37:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
06:37:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE.
06:37:54PM >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
06:37:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LEFT OFF WITH COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO.
06:37:59PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:38:00PM I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO DENY REZ 25-80 BASED ON THE
06:38:06PM FACT THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN AN AREA THAT IS
06:38:09PM PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, AND THAT THE PROPERTY HAS
06:38:12PM BEEN MISUSED AS A MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY EVEN THOUGH IT IS A
06:38:17PM SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND SHOULD BE.
06:38:20PM AND HAS BEEN USED -- USED IN THAT FASHION FOR A WHILE.
06:38:25PM SO THAT IS MY BASIS FOR DENIAL.
06:38:27PM IS THAT SUFFICIENT, MR. SHELBY?
06:38:30PM I DON'T HAVE TO CITE ANY SPECIFIC BECAUSE --
06:38:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT IS AN EUCLIDIAN REZONING UNLESS ANYTHING
06:38:38PM ELSE WOULD LIKE TO ADD, THAT WILL BE SUFFICIENT.
06:38:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
06:38:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO.
06:38:42PM A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
06:38:44PM DOES THAT REQUIRE ROLL CALL?
06:38:47PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO.
06:38:47PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
06:38:48PM OPPOSED?
06:38:49PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
06:38:51PM CLERK, WILL YOU READ THAT FOR ME.
06:38:54PM >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES --
06:38:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FAILS -- SORRY, IT DID CARRY BECAUSE IT WAS A
06:39:01PM MOTION TO DENY.
06:39:03PM >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
06:39:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: VERY GOOD.
06:39:08PM THANK YOU SO MUCH.
06:39:09PM THAT CONCLUDES THE LAST ITEM OF BUSINESS.
06:39:12PM IS THERE ANY NEW BUSINESS?
06:39:15PM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:39:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I MOTION TO HAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
06:39:21PM PRESENT TO TAMPA CITY COUNCIL ABOUT THE CITY OF TAMPA 2026
06:39:24PM REDISTRICTING AT THE NOVEMBER 20, 2025 COUNCIL REGULAR
06:39:30PM MEETING.
06:39:30PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:39:33PM A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO.
06:39:35PM ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
06:39:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: VERY SORRY ABOUT THE FEEDBACK.
06:39:40PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: QUESTION ON THAT, IF I CAN.
06:39:42PM IS THAT UNDER STAFF REPORTS OR COMMENDATIONS OR
06:39:45PM PRESENTATIONS?
06:39:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE NO IDEA.
06:39:46PM I AM JUST HANDING THESE THINGS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
06:39:49PM AND I READ THEM.
06:39:50PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT WILL RUN?
06:39:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THERE YOU GO.
06:39:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ASK AND SHE SHALL APPEAR.
06:40:01PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
06:40:02PM STAFF.
06:40:02PM PLANNING COMMISSION WAS HOPING TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THE
06:40:05PM REDISTRICTING EFFORTS UNDER THE STAFF REPORTS TO BE HERE TO
06:40:12PM PRESENT.
06:40:13PM WHATEVER THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNCIL IS.
06:40:14PM >>LYNN HURTAK: ACTUALLY, IT MIGHT BE NICE TO DO IT DURING
06:40:18PM PRESENTATIONS JUST SO THAT IT IS DONE, AND THE PUBLIC CAN
06:40:21PM HEAR ABOUT IT.
06:40:23PM AND THEY HAVE A TIME CERTAIN.
06:40:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: BETTER FOR YOU.
06:40:27PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN, THAT'S CORRECT.
06:40:32PM >>BILL CARLSON: I THINK THE MIKE IS PICKING UP -- YOU HEAR
06:40:37PM HER, SHE IS LOUDER THAN NORMAL.
06:40:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CCTV, DEFINITELY SOMETHING WITH THE PODIUM
06:40:43PM MIKE.
06:40:43PM NOT THAT IT MATTERS TONIGHT BECAUSE WE ARE ALMOST DONE.
06:40:47PM HERE WE GO.
06:40:48PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I WILL ASK THAT BE -- I WANT TO MAKE SURE
06:40:52PM THERE IS ROOM IN CEREMONIALS.
06:40:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THERE IS, COMMENDATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS.
06:40:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I ASK THAT IT IS DURING THE CEREMONIALS,
06:40:59PM WHICH WILL BE BEFORE PUBLIC COMMENT.
06:41:01PM SO --
06:41:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHO IS THE SECOND?
06:41:07PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
06:41:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
06:41:09PM OPPOSED?
06:41:10PM THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY, THANK YOU.
06:41:13PM >>LYNN HURTAK: A REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
06:41:15PM REMOVE TA/CPA 24-04, TA/CPA 24-05 AND TA/CPA 24-06 FROM
06:41:24PM OCTOBER 30, 2025, 5:01 ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING.
06:41:28PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
06:41:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:41:30PM SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
06:41:34PM ALL THAT FAVOR SAY AYE.
06:41:39PM OPPOSED.
06:41:40PM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
06:41:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THE PLANNING COMMISSION SENT US AN EMAIL THAT
06:41:47PM THE STATE DID NOT AGREE WITH.
06:41:49PM WE GOT IT YESTERDAY.
06:41:50PM READ IT.
06:41:52PM >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A CONVERSATION
06:41:54PM ON THAT WELL?
06:41:57PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: ONE MORE FOR ME TO DO.
06:41:58PM JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
06:41:59PM THAT WAS IN REGARDS TO A PRIVATELY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENT
06:42:03PM THAT CAME BEFORE YOU ON JULY 31.
06:42:05PM SO IT IS SCHEDULED FOR ADOPTION ON SEPTEMBER 25.
06:42:09PM AND WE WILL BE PRESENTING THE LETTER FROM THE STATE, BUT IT
06:42:14PM IS ALL INCLUDED.
06:42:15PM YOU ALL HAVE IT.
06:42:16PM AND WE HAVE ASKED THE APPLICANT TO PREPARE A RESPONSE FOR
06:42:19PM CITY COUNCIL.
06:42:20PM >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU THINK, THOUGH, IT HAS BROADER
06:42:23PM IMPLICATIONS THAT WE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ESPECIALLY BEFORE WE
06:42:26PM GET INTO WHATEVER THE NEXT ADDITION IS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
06:42:28PM PLAN?
06:42:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: TAKE AN IOU.
06:42:31PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I MEAN, IT'S THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL -- I
06:42:36PM -- I WOULD BE HAPPY TO SCHEDULE A BRIEFING.
06:42:40PM MAYBE THIS -- MAYBE NEXT WEEK.
06:42:41PM >>BILL CARLSON: MORE FOR THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE
06:42:45PM IMPLICATIONS ARE.
06:42:47PM THINK ABOUT IT AND LET US KNOW.
06:42:48PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IF WE TALK ABOUT IT.
06:42:50PM IF WE EACH GET SOME BRIEFINGS, MAYBE NEXT WEEK, BY THE TIME
06:42:54PM IT ROLLS AROUND ON SEPTEMBER 25, WE WILL BE ABLE TO BE
06:42:58PM PREPARED TO TALK TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT IT.
06:43:00PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: YES, MA'AM.
06:43:01PM AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS ALREADY BEEN COORDINATING
06:43:04PM WITH SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ'S DEPARTMENT TO BE BRIEFING YOU
06:43:07PM BEFORE SEPTEMBER 25.
06:43:08PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WONDERFUL.
06:43:10PM IF THERE IS ONE THING SO THE PUBLIC KNOW WHAT IS WE ARE
06:43:12PM TALKING ABOUT.
06:43:13PM CAN YOU JUST MENTION WHAT THIS IS SO WE ARE NOT -- WHAT IS
06:43:17PM IT -- WHAT DO THE KIDS SAY TODAY, SUB-SKEETING?
06:43:23PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU LOOKING AT ME?
06:43:26PM HONESTLY, FEEL FREE TO TAKE AN IOU TO COME BACK AT THE NEXT
06:43:30PM MEETING PREPARED -- UNLESS YOU ARE PREPARED TO ANSWER IT --
06:43:34PM I DON'T WANT TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT.
06:43:35PM >> I AM PREPARED.
06:43:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK: JUST WHAT THE ITEM IS, THE 30,000-FOOT VIEW.
06:43:43PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I DON'T REMEMBER THE CASE NUMBER, BUT I
06:43:45PM CAN TELL YOU IT IS RELATED TO THE CHANNEL DISTRICT BONUS FEE
06:43:50PM -- THE SPECIAL BONUS TO ALLOW GREATER INCREASE IN THE CDB
06:43:57PM PERIPHERY.
06:43:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: VERY GOOD.
06:43:58PM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:43:59PM >>BILL CARLSON: HAS YOUR BOARD DISCUSSED IT YET?
06:44:05PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: IT IS NOT -- SO IT IS NOT GOING BACK TO
06:44:08PM OUR BOARD.
06:44:09PM ONCE THE BOARD TAKES ACTION ON IT, IT IS TRANSMITTED AND
06:44:18PM COMES BEFORE YOU.
06:44:18PM >>BILL CARLSON: I HEARD IT YESTERDAY.
06:44:21PM WILL LEAVE IT TO YOU, MELISSA AND YOUR TEAM, IF YOUR BOARD
06:44:27PM DISCOVERS THE RAMIFICATION AND ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED FOR US
06:44:31PM TO KNOW.
06:44:32PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: IT MAY HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED IN ALL
06:44:35PM HONESTLY ON MONDAY NIGHT.
06:44:36PM I WILL HAVE TO WATCH THAT MEETING TO SEE IF IT WAS BROUGHT
06:44:40PM UP, BUT TO MY KNOWLEDGE, IT HAVEN'T BEEN DISCUSSED.
06:44:43PM >>BILL CARLSON: JUST LIKE ANY OTHER RULINGS FROM THE STATE,
06:44:46PM IT LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT HIT.
06:44:47PM IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT BE PART OF A NEW PRECEDENT, WE
06:44:51PM WANT TO KNOW WHAT IT IS.
06:44:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO, DO YOU HAVE ANY
06:44:56PM NEW BUSINESS?
06:44:56PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WOULD LIKE TO WISH MAYOR DICK GRECO A
06:45:00PM HAPPY BIRTHDAY.
06:45:01PM HE TURNS 92 YEARS OLD THIS SUNDAY.
06:45:04PM HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MR. GRECO.
06:45:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON.
06:45:08PM OH, MY GOSH --
06:45:11PM >>BILL CARLSON: YOU GOT UPGRADED TONIGHT.
06:45:14PM YOU GOT CALLED CARLSON.
06:45:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SHOTS FIRED.
06:45:19PM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
06:45:20PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
06:45:20PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCIL
06:45:23PM MEMBER MANISCALCO.
06:45:23PM SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
06:45:25PM >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I ASK ONE THING?
06:45:28PM THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY IS TRYING TO SET UP A MEETING WITH
06:45:32PM US.
06:45:32PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE ARE WORKING ON IT.
06:45:34PM TENTATIVELY IN DECEMBER.
06:45:36PM IT WILL COME BEFORE OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.
06:45:38PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER
06:45:41PM MANISCALCO.
06:45:41PM SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
06:45:43PM ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
06:45:44PM OPPOSED?
06:45:44PM THE AYES HAVE IT.
06:45:46PM WE ARE ADJOURNED.
06:45:47PM HAVE A GOOD NIGHT, EVERYBODY.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.