TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2018
6:00 P.M. SESSION
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS FILE WAS PRODUCED IN ALL CAPITAL
LETTERS AND ANY VARIATION THERETO MAY BE A RESULT OF THIRD
PARTY EDITS AND SOFTWARE COMPATIBILITY ISSUES.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
16:27:28
18:02:15 [SOUNDING GAVEL]
18:02:19 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
18:02:22 GOOD EVENING.
18:02:23 WE ARE GOING TO CALL THIS EVENING MEETING TO ORDER.
18:02:26 ROLL CALL.
18:02:26 >>MIKE SUAREZ: HERE.
18:02:29 >>HARRY COHEN: HERE.
18:02:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
18:02:32 >>YVONNE CAPIN: PRESENT.
18:02:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
18:02:35 >>FRANK REDDICK: LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT COUNCILMAN VIERA
18:02:39 WILL BE ABSENT FOR THIS EVENING'S MEETING
18:02:45 ALL RIGHT.
18:02:46 STAFF, DO WE HAVE ANY HOUSE CREEPING WE NEED TO DO?
18:02:51 >> MOVE TO OPEN 1 THROUGH 14.
18:02:57 >> MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
18:02:58 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
18:03:00 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
18:03:01 OPPOSED?
18:03:02 OKAY.
18:03:02 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:03:05 GOOD EVENING.
18:03:05 ITEM NUMBER 7, THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS
18:03:09 APPLICATION.
18:03:09 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, MR.
18:03:26 SHELBY.
18:03:26 MY NAME IS JOHN GRANDOFF, SUITE 3700 BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA.
18:03:31 ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANTS IN BE THIS MATTER, WE WITHDRAW
18:03:34 THE APPLICATION THIS EVENING.
18:03:36 AND I WILL PROVIDE A LETTER TO MS. SAMANIEGO CONFIRM THAT IN
18:03:43 THE RECORD TOMORROW AFTERNOON.
18:03:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE NUMBER 7 BE WITHDRAWN.
18:03:47 >> MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
18:03:48 SECONDED BY COHEN.
18:03:50 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
18:03:51 OPPOSED?
18:03:52 OKAY.
18:03:52 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: THANK YOU.
18:03:55 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANYTHING ELSE?
18:03:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IS THERE A REQUEST TO MOVE
18:04:00 ITEM NUMBER 14?
18:04:01 IT'S JUST A MATTER OF MOVING THE RESOLUTION.
18:04:05 IF COUNCIL WOULD BE SO KIND AS TO TAKE UP NUMBER 14 JUST BY
18:04:09 MOVING THE RESOLUTION.
18:04:10 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I MOVE ITEM 14.
18:04:12 >> SECOND.
18:04:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: AND I WOULD HOPE IN THE FUTURE THEY WILL
18:04:17 BRING TO THE OUR ATTENTION BEFORE WE HAVE OUR MEETING.
18:04:20 ALL RIGHT?
18:04:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN, I UNDERSTAND.
18:04:27 ALSO I BELIEVE THE CLERK CLARIFIED THAT ITEM NUMBER 14 IS A
18:04:31 SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD.
18:04:32 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I WOULD MOVE IF SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION FOR
18:04:36 HOLDING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 25, 2018, AND SEPTEMBER
18:04:50 6, 2018, BOTH AT 10:30 A.M.
18:04:57 MOTION CARRIED.
18:04:57 >>
18:04:58 >>REBECCA KERT: ITEM 1 IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE WESTSHORE
18:05:04 AREA WIDE DRI, TO INCREASE THE DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL
18:05:09 USE AND INCREASING THE NUMBER OF HOTEL ROOMS, BECAUSE IT IS
18:05:13 A CHANGE OF THE TRADE-OFF MECHANISM.
18:05:15 THERE WILL BE NO NET INCREASE.
18:05:19 PREVIOUSLY ON THE STATE LEGISLATION, AND THE EXPIRATION DATE
18:05:22 WERE ADMINISTERED -- ADMINISTRATIVELY EXTENDED.
18:05:25 THIS IS JUST INCORPORATING THAT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT
18:05:27 AGREEMENT.
18:05:29 THEY ARE ALSO CHANGING THE RECORDING REQUIREMENT FROM ANNUAL
18:05:32 TO BIANNUAL AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE THAT IS CHARGED AND
18:05:37 THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD FEE.
18:05:39 THE DEVELOPER IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:05:40 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
18:05:45 BEFORE YOU SPEAK, ANYONE PLANNING ON SPEAKING ON ITEMS 1
18:05:50 THROUGH 13, PLEASE STAND AND BE SWORN IN.
18:05:53 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK)
18:06:09 >>DAVID MECHANIK: 305 SOUTH BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
18:06:13 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE WESTSHORE ALLIANCE.
18:06:17 I HAVE WITH ME THIS EVENING THE CEO OF THE WESTSHORE
18:06:21 ALLIANCE AND RANDY COEN, AN URBAN PLANNER WHO WORKED ON THIS
18:06:28 APPLICATION.
18:06:29 I THINK REBECCA DID A COMPLETE JOB DESCRIBING THE CHANGES.
18:06:34 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE FOR THE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW US MORE
18:06:38 FLEXIBILITY WITH REGARD TO INCREASING DEMAND FOR RESIDENTIAL
18:06:44 AND FOR HOTEL ROOMS IN THE WESTSHORE DISTRICT.
18:06:49 THERE WILL BE NO IMPACT AS A RESULT OF THAT CHANGE BECAUSE
18:06:52 THERE'S A TRADE-OFF OF OTHER USES.
18:06:55 SO THAT'S TO CREATE AN EQUIVALENCY OF TRAFFIC IMPACT AND
18:06:59 WATER AND SEWER IMPACTS AND SO FORTH.
18:07:01 WITH THAT WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
18:07:04 AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR APPROVAL.
18:07:06 THANK YOU.
18:07:07 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
18:07:08 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1?
18:07:13 MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA TO CLOSE.
18:07:14 SECOND BY MR. BE MANISCALCO.
18:07:16 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
18:07:18 OPPOSED?
18:07:19 ALL RIGHT.
18:07:19 MR. SUAREZ, WOULD YOU READ NUMBER 1?
18:07:22 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I PRESENT AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING
18:07:25 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA
18:07:28 AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06
18:07:33 FLORIDA STATUTE, BY THE WESTSHORE LINES DRI NUMBER 141 AS
18:07:43 PREVIOUSLY -- A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
18:07:47 IMPACT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:07:48 >> SECOND.
18:07:49 >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
18:07:51 I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT THAT WAS AN ORDINANCE OUT OF
18:07:55 100 PAGES OF THE EXHIBITS, WE LEFT OUT A VERY IMPORTANT PAGE
18:07:59 SO THE TITLE IS PHENOTYPE AND YOU READ IT CORRECTLY.
18:08:02 I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY.
18:08:03 >>FRANK REDDICK: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. SUAREZ.
18:08:08 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
18:08:10 DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
18:08:12 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
18:08:14 OPPOSED?
18:08:15 ALL RIGHT.
18:08:16 THANK YOU.
18:08:16 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
18:08:24 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON AUGUST 23rd AT
18:08:26 10:30 A.M.
18:08:27 >>FRANK REDDICK: NUMBER 2.
18:08:29 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:08:34 ITEM NUMBER 2 ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS REZ 18-61
18:08:39 LOCATED AT 3210 WEST PAUL AVENUE.
18:08:42 THE REQUEST TONIGHT IS FROM AN RS-60 TO AN RS-50. THIS IS A
18:08:47 EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST AND THERE ARE NO WAIVERS THAT MAY
18:08:50 BE PERMITTED UNDER THIS APPLICATION.
18:08:52 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:09:00 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:09:01 WE START THE NIGHT OUT IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
18:09:06 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE GANDY SUN BAY SOUTH
18:09:12 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:09:12 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS BEHIND THE
18:09:16 SPORTS COMPLEX LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET TO THE
18:09:19 NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:09:21 THERE IS NO TRANSIT SERVICE WITHIN ONE MILE OF THIS SITE,
18:09:24 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION
18:09:28 ZONE.
18:09:30 ONTO THE AERIAL.
18:09:31 THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE CENTER.
18:09:33 THIS IS PAUL AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE.
18:09:36 AND NORTH-SOUTH.
18:09:41 GANDY TO THE NORTH.
18:09:42 THIS IS THE ABC LIQUOR AT MacDILL AND GANDY BOULEVARD.
18:09:47 YOU CAN SEE THE AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
18:09:51 IN CHARACTER.
18:09:52 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:09:54 THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE TAN COLOR IS ALL THE RESIDENTIAL 10.
18:09:59 AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL MIXED USE CORRIDOR TO
18:10:02 THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST OF MacDILL AND GANDY.
18:10:08 THAT BEING THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE
18:10:11 CATEGORY.
18:10:14 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL 50
18:10:19 ZONING DISTRICT.
18:10:21 THIS PORTION OF WEST PAUL AVENUE WAS DEVELOPED FOR A MIXTURE
18:10:24 OF LOT SIZES AND EXISTING DENSITY FOR PARCELS FROM THIS
18:10:27 BLOCK OF WEST PAUL AVENUE EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE AND ONE
18:10:30 VACANT BUILDABLE LOT, 4.5 UNITS PER ACRE.
18:10:34 THE SUBJECT SITE BASED ON THE MINIMUM OF 50 FEET OF FRONTAGE
18:10:38 PER PARCEL WOULD ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM OF 2 SINGLE-FAMILY
18:10:41 DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND OVERALL DENSITY OF 6.1
18:10:44 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
18:10:46 PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS WOULD BE
18:10:48 OF A SIMILAR FORM, PRICE AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING
18:10:51 RESIDENTIAL USES.
18:10:53 IT WOULD NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
18:10:55 PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF THE GANDY SUN BAY SOUTH
18:10:58 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:10:59 PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
18:11:01 ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
18:11:04 CATEGORY.
18:11:05 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
18:11:08 FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS
18:11:11 OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:11:12 THANK YOU.
18:11:12 >>ABBYE FEELEY: 3210 WEST PAUL AVENUE IS 100 BY 144 FOR A
18:11:26 TOTAL OF 14,300 SQUARE FEET.
18:11:29 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE BETWEEN SOUTH
18:11:34 SHERIDAN AND THE LOT PLATTED IN 19250 AS 50 BY APPROXIMATE
18:11:41 134-POINT WITH A 16-FOOT PLATTED ALLEY BEHIND THAT.
18:11:44 THE ALLEY WAS VACATED FROM THE SOUTH HALF 8 FEET FROM THE
18:11:49 PRIOR ADJACENT LOT.
18:11:50 THEREFORE THE LOT WOULD BE 50 BY 142.8 WITH APPROXIMATELY
18:11:54 7,140 SQUARE FEET.
18:11:58 THE ZONING ATLAS.
18:12:05 PROPERTY IS SHOWN IN GREEN.
18:12:07 THERE'S RS-50 IS IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH.
18:12:10 RECENT REZONING, BACK IN APRIL, DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, AND
18:12:15 THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
18:12:22 THESE WERE PROBABLY IN THE PAST TWO YEARS, THOSE FIVE HAVE
18:12:27 BEEN DONE.
18:12:34 OTHER THAN THAT, THOSE LOTS THAT CONFINED IN THE 06-FOOT OR
18:12:38 LARGER.
18:12:38 YOU MAY REMEMBER, YOU MAY NOT, FROM ONE OF THE LOTS, ZONING
18:12:42 THAT WE DID, THIS ANALYSIS INCLUDED THREE DIFFERENT
18:12:47 SUBDIVISIONS.
18:12:51 GANDY BOULEVARD PARK, WHICH WAS WEST OF SHERIDAN,
18:12:56 MacDILL WHICH WAS FROM PRICE, IN THIS AREA OF
18:13:00 MacDILL, AND THEN THE SUBDIVISION THAT THIS APPLICATION
18:13:05 IS CONTAINED WITHIN, WHICH IS UNIT 1, STARTS SOUTH AND GOES
18:13:16 NORTH, AND THEN THERE WAS ONE THAT WAS PART OF TROPICAL
18:13:20 NUMBER 2.
18:13:21 SO WHEN THESE ON THE WEST SIDE IS A DIFFERENT SUBDIVISION
18:13:28 AND THIS ONE WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED.
18:13:33 BUT IN THE RECENT BLOCK FACE, AND THE SURROUNDING AREA STAFF
18:13:38 DID FIND THE REQUEST FOR THE REESTABLISHMENT OF THE LOTS TO
18:13:42 BE CONSISTENT WITH THE RS-50.
18:13:45 I WILL SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY.
18:13:53 THIS IS THE SUBJECT.
18:13:58 THIS IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT.
18:14:00 THIS IS HEADING BACK TOWARD 6th.
18:14:07 THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE.
18:14:09 YOU MAY REMEMBER THIS ONE FAR BACK.
18:14:11 AND THEN THERE WAS A RECENT REDEVELOPMENT AT THE CORNER OF
18:14:15 6th AND PAUL.
18:14:17 AND THEN TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT, SHERIDAN.
18:14:27 NOW DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET THE ONE THAT WAS RECENTLY
18:14:31 REZONED IS ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
18:14:33 AND THEN EAST OF THAT, ALSO IN RS-50, WERE THESE
18:14:40 CONTEMPORARY HOMES.
18:14:42 AND THEN AT THE OTHER END AN RS-50, TWO HOMES WENT UP.
18:14:54 THERE WERE TWO -- THIS IS AT THE WESTERN END OF THE BLOCK AT
18:15:00 THE CORNER OF SHERIDAN AND PAUL.
18:15:02 THE NORTHEAST CORNER.
18:15:05 AGAIN, STAFF DID FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
18:15:07 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER.
18:15:10 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
18:15:12 ALL RIGHT.
18:15:13 APPLICANT?
18:15:19 >>GINA GRIMES: HILL, WARD, HENDERSON, 101 EAST KENNEDY
18:15:22 BOULEVARD.
18:15:23 I'M HERE TONIGHT REPRESENTING MOBLEY HOMES, REZONING FROM
18:15:28 RS-60 TO RS-50.
18:15:31 AS ABBYE MENTIONED, THIS PROPERTY IS IN AN OLD PLAT BACK IN
18:15:38 1925.
18:15:38 THIS PLAT IS KNOWN AS TROPICAL TERRACE NUMBER 1 BUT WHAT'S
18:15:42 IMPORTANT IS THAT ALL OF THE LOTS WERE ORIGINALLY PLATTED AT
18:15:45 50 FEET.
18:15:46 ALL OF THE LOTS IN THIS PLAT.
18:15:50 ALSO, AS ABBYE MENTIONED -- AND I AM SORRY I AM COVERING
18:15:54 SOME OF THAT -- BUT WHAT WE ARE INTENDING TO DO IS
18:15:57 REESTABLISH THE PLAT LINE.
18:15:59 BUT YOU CAN ALSO SEE THESE OTHER TWO SUBDIVISIONS
18:16:03 IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT, UNIT NUMBER 1, AND MacDILL, THEY
18:16:09 WERE PLATTED ORIGINALLY BACK IN THE EARLY 1900S AS 50-FOOT
18:16:13 LOTS.
18:16:14 THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.
18:16:16 AND WHAT IT SHOWS IS THAT THE PROPERTY IS 100 FEET, RIGHT
18:16:21 NOW, 100 FEET BY 143 FEET SO IT'S A VERY, VERY DEEP LOT.
18:16:29 WE ARE REQUESTING TO BUILD TWO HOMES ON THIS LOT.
18:16:33 AS ABBYE MENTIONED IT'S 14,300 SQUARE FEET.
18:16:37 ABOUT A THIRD OF AN ACRE.
18:16:39 OUR REQUEST BE IS TO BUILD TWO HOMES ON THE LOT
18:16:41 APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF AN ACRE.
18:16:44 AS DAVID MENTIONED THE COMP PLAN CATEGORY IS R-10. THIS
18:16:47 PROPOSAL WITH TWO HOMES ON A THIRD OF AN ACRE WOULD EQUAL A
18:16:52 6 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE DENSITY.
18:16:54 SO WE ARE WELL ABOVE THE COMP PLAN DENSITY OF 10 DWELLING
18:16:58 UNITS PER ACRE.
18:16:59 THE SURVEY SHOWS BUILDING THESE TWO SEPARATE LOTS EACH BEING
18:17:08 7,140 SQUARE FEET, EACH THOUGH WE ARE REZONING FROM RS-60,
18:17:13 THESE PROPOSED LOTS EVEN THOUGH THEY WILL BE REZONED TO
18:17:17 RS-50, THEY STILL MEET THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENT FOR THE
18:17:23 RS-60.
18:17:24 THEY ARE ABOVE AND BEYOND 20% LARGER THAN WHAT THE MINIMUM
18:17:31 LOT AREA IS FOR THE RS 306 ZONING.
18:17:33 AT THIS TIME LOT WIDTH THAT IS DRIVING THE NEED FOR THE
18:17:36 REZONING.
18:17:40 IN THE STAFF REPORT, YOU SAW THAT THESE TYPES OF
18:17:44 APPLICATIONS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE EVALUATED BASED ON WHETHER
18:17:46 THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH A PHYSICAL
18:17:53 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE AREA AND WHETHER IT'S CONSISTENT
18:17:55 WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
18:17:57 WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE SUBJECT LOT, THERE ARE 20 LOTS IN THE
18:18:03 SUBJECT LOT.
18:18:05 70% OF THOSE LOTS, 14 OF THE LOTS, 14 OF THE 20 LOTS, ARE
18:18:13 ALREADY LESS THAN 60 FEET WIDE.
18:18:18 WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE BLOCK FACE ON PAUL -- (SIRENS).
18:18:25 >>FRANK REDDICK: EXCUSE ME FOR A SECOND.
18:18:27 PLEASE PUT YOUR PHONE ON VIBRATOR SILENT.
18:18:30 THANK YOU.
18:18:33 >>GINA GRIMES: WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE BLOCK FACE ALONG PAUL,
18:18:35 THERE ARE ACTUALLY NINE LOTS.
18:18:37 THE MAJORITY OF THOSE LOTS ON THE BLOCK FACE, FIVE OF THOSE
18:18:41 LOTS, 55% ARE ALSO LESS THAN THE RS-60 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
18:18:46 REQUIREMENT.
18:18:50 ABBYE SHOWED YOU THE REZONING MAP.
18:18:52 AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S ALREADY BEEN SEVERAL RS-50 REZONINGS
18:18:56 IN THIS AREA.
18:18:58 THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
18:19:05 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
18:19:06 ONE HOUSE ON A LARGE LOT.
18:19:09 ALSO, THE HOUSES IMMEDIATELY ACROSS THE STREET.
18:19:17 NEW HOMES.
18:19:18 BRAND NEW HOMES RS-50 LOTS.
18:19:23 FIT IN WELL WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA.
18:19:26 THESE ARE THE TWO HOMES THAT SHE MENTIONED.
18:19:28 BUT I WANT TO SHOW YOU SOMETHING ELSE.
18:19:30 THESE ARE NEW HOMES.
18:19:33 BUT WHAT WAS INTERESTING IS ON THIS SIDE OF PAUL,
18:19:37 IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE FIVE LOTS
18:19:45 RIGHT HERE ARE ALSO BUILT ON 50-FOOT LOTS.
18:19:53 BUT WHAT'S INTERESTING ABOUT IT IS ALL THESE HOMES ARE OLD
18:19:56 ENOUGH, SO NEW HOMES THAT ARE BUILT ON 50-FOOT LOTS, THERE'S
18:20:01 A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THERE ON THIS PARTICULAR SEGMENT OF
18:20:05 PAUL THAT SHOWS THAT THERE WERE SEVERAL OLDER HOMES IN THE
18:20:09 FIVE HOMES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE
18:20:12 OLDER HOMES ARE ALL BUILT ON 50-FOOT LOTS.
18:20:17 SO NOT NECESSARILY A CHANGE TO THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
18:20:21 IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
18:20:26 AS YOU HEARD FROM BOTH CITY STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION
18:20:28 STAFF, THE CITY STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT BECAUSE IT
18:20:31 REESTABLISHES AN ORIGINAL PLATTED LOT LINE.
18:20:34 THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS FOR ONE HOME TO BE BUILT ON A
18:20:37 50-FOOT LOT.
18:20:38 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ALSO FOUND IT CONSISTENT BECAUSE
18:20:42 IT ALLOWS COMPATIBLE IN-FILL IN AREAS THAT'S PROGRAMMED AND
18:20:46 PLANNED FOR TEN UNITS PER ACRE AND IT WELL BELOW THAT.
18:20:49 SO GIVEN THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PROPOSAL WITH THE ORIGINAL
18:20:54 PLAT AND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, WE WOULD REQUEST YOUR
18:20:58 APPROVAL OF THIS REZONING TO RS-50.
18:21:01 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
18:21:04 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 2?
18:21:06 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:21:09 >> SECOND.
18:21:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA TO CLOSE.
18:21:11 SECOND BY MS. CAPIN.
18:21:13 ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION SAY AYE.
18:21:15 OPPOSED?
18:21:15 MR. COHEN, WOULD YOU READ NUMBER 26?
18:21:17 >>HARRY COHEN: I MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
18:21:21 READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
18:21:23 GENERAL VICINITY OF 3210 WEST PAUL AVENUE IN THE CITY OF
18:21:28 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
18:21:31 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL
18:21:35 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, PROVIDING
18:21:38 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:21:38 >> SECOND.
18:21:39 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. COHEN.
18:21:41 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
18:21:42 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
18:21:44 OPPOSED?
18:21:44 OKAY.
18:21:45 ITEM NUMBER 3.
18:21:46 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
18:21:53 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON AUGUST 23rd AT
18:21:55 9:30 A.M.
18:21:56 >>FRANK REDDICK: ITEM NUMBER 3.
18:22:01 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:22:03 ITEM NUMBER 3 ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING SAN REQUEST, REZ
18:22:07 18-74, LOCATED AT 7411 NORTH HUTTON PLACE, FROM AN RM-24
18:22:15 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
18:22:18 THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST AND THERE ARE NO
18:22:21 WAIVERS THAT MAY BE REQUESTED OR PERMITTED WITH THIS
18:22:23 APPLICATION.
18:22:24 >> DAVID HEY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:22:33 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:22:34 WE MOVE UP TO THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT
18:22:38 CASE, ONE OF THE THREE IDENTIFIED GROWTH AREAS FOR THE CITY.
18:22:43 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ALONG A MIXED USE CORRIDOR BASED
18:22:47 ON THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
18:22:51 THERE IS TRANSIT ALONG THAT PORTION OF 40TH STREET AND THE
18:22:55 SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE.
18:22:59 AS YOU CAN SEE, 40TH STREET IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR
18:23:04 AS WELL.
18:23:05 HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 40TH
18:23:11 STREET.
18:23:11 IT HARD TO SEE, BUT ACTUALLY TO THE NORTH IS THE 40TH STREET
18:23:16 SEAFOOD HOUSE RIGHT IN THERE, WHICH IS ZONED CG.
18:23:20 YOU CAN ALSO SEE TO THE WEST A MULTI-SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED,
18:23:24 AND THEN TO THE EAST YOU HAVE THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER, AND
18:23:29 OTHER PROPERTIES ZONED COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
18:23:32 THIS IS ALSO THE RIVER PINES APARTMENT COMPLEX.
18:23:40 OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE, THE PROPERTY TO
18:23:43 THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST ALL THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
18:23:48 AND THEN AS YOU GO ONTO THE OTHER SIDE OF NORTH HUTTON PLACE
18:23:53 TO THE WEST, IT DROPS DOWN TO THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE
18:23:58 LAND USE CATEGORY.
18:24:00 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF LOOKED AT THE PROPOSED CG ZONING
18:24:04 DISTRICT AND FOUND THAT IT IS COMPARABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT
18:24:07 PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
18:24:11 THERE IS CG ZONING TO THE NORTH, AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT
18:24:15 SITE CURRENTLY.
18:24:17 SO BASED ON THAT AND THE POLICY DIRECTIONS WITHIN THE PLAN,
18:24:20 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE PROPOSED REZONING
18:24:24 CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:24:26 THANK YOU.
18:24:26 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:24:34 REZ 18-74, AGAIN THIS IS A REQUEST FROM RM-24 TO CG TO ALLOW
18:24:41 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A PROPERTY WITH COMMERCIAL USES.
18:24:43 THIS PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 34,947 SQUARE FEET.
18:24:49 JUST .8 ACRES.
18:24:51 IT IS BOARDED BY NORTH HUTTON PLACE ON THE WEST, PINE TREE
18:24:55 PLACE ON THE NORTH AND 40TH STREET ON THE EAST.
18:24:57 MINIMUM SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL IS
18:25:00 10,000 SQUARE FEET WITH A 75-FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH.
18:25:09 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:25:18 THE ATLAS.
18:25:19 THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN IN GREEN.
18:25:21 PINE TREE TO THE NORTH.
18:25:22 HUTTON TO THE WEST.
18:25:23 40TH STREET TO THE EAST.
18:25:30 AS SHOWN AND DAVID MENTIONED IT IS COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO THE
18:25:33 NORTH OF THIS PROPERTY.
18:25:36 AND ALL THE WAY BACK TO HUTTON, LAKE SHORE DRIVE IN THAT
18:25:41 AREA, AND THEN 40TH STREET, YOU HAVE A MIX OF COMMERCIAL
18:25:47 GENERAL AND THEN INTO THE RS, RM-24 ALONG THE RIVER.
18:25:56 THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE SITE.
18:25:59 AGAIN SHOWN HERE IN YELLOW.
18:26:03 RESIDENTIAL USE -- PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY.
18:26:07 THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PINE TREE LOOKING SOUTH.
18:26:12 THIS IS FROM HUTTON LOOKING BACK TOWARDS 40th.
18:26:17 THIS IS TRAVELING DOWN SOUTH ON HUTTON LOOKING BACK TOWARDS
18:26:21 40th.
18:26:22 DAVID MENTIONED THE HOUSE DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH.
18:26:26 THIS IS NORTHWEST.
18:26:29 THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF HUTTON AND PINE STREET DIRECTLY
18:26:33 ACROSS FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST.
18:26:36 WE ARE HEADING DOWN NOW THE WEST SIDE OF HUTTON, AND SOUTH,
18:26:43 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS HUTTON.
18:26:46 DIRECTLY ACROSS 40TH STREET WHICH IS FOUR LANES DIVIDED
18:26:49 THERE IN THE MEDIAN LOOKING TOWARD THE EAST SIDE OF
18:26:54 40th.
18:27:02 I HAVE HAD SOME PHONE CALLS FROM A NEIGHBOR, AND I DO WANT
18:27:06 TO ADDRESS ONE ITEM BEFORE I GO FORWARD.
18:27:09 THERE WAS A QUESTION BECAUSE OF THE ZONING ATLAS IT SHOWS
18:27:16 THAT SMALL PIECE AS BEING PD.
18:27:21 THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY IS PD BASED ON THE SURVEY.
18:27:23 I JUST WANTED TO SHOW YOU IN GREEN WHAT THAT WOULD
18:27:26 ENCOMPASS.
18:27:28 AS TO HOW MUCH OF THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY --
18:27:36 THE APPLICATION THAT THE CITY OF TAMPA DID ALONG 40TH
18:27:39 STREET, THERE WERE SOME REMNANTS THAT WERE LEFT OUT THERE
18:27:42 THAT WERE NOT ACQUIRED, SO WE TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO
18:27:52 BACK THROUGH THAT TODAY AND LOOK AS TO WHAT PORTION OF THE
18:27:55 SITE IS CURRENTLY CG.
18:27:57 THE MAJORITY ARE RM-24.
18:28:01 THE RM-24 GOES TO CG.
18:28:08 STAFF DID FIND THIS REQUEST CONSISTENT.
18:28:15 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:28:16 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:28:18 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
18:28:20 L.APPLICANT?
18:28:20 >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I'M JOHN LAROCCA, CONSULTING GROUP
18:28:29 AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT.
18:28:31 DAVID AND ABBYE MADE A COMPLETE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION OF
18:28:37 THE APPLICATION, AND YOU HAVE THE REZONING REPORT IN FRONT
18:28:41 OF YOU IN YOUR RECORD.
18:28:44 THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY TO
18:28:48 GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
18:28:50 DESIGNATION.
18:28:51 THE MAPS THAT ABBYE AND DAVID ILLUSTRATED ON THE ELMO
18:28:56 CLEARLY REFLECT WHERE THE PROPERTY SITS WITHIN THE LONG
18:29:00 RANGE PLAN.
18:29:01 WHEN WE PROCEED ABOUT REZONING APPLICATIONS, IN MY CASE, I
18:29:05 DON'T EVER TAKE THEM LIGHTLY AND I MEET WITH THE STAFF.
18:29:08 WE HAVE PREAPPLICATION MEETINGS.
18:29:10 WE TRY TO DETERMINE IS THIS CONSISTENT?
18:29:12 I DON'T LIKE TO PRESENT ANYTHING FORWARD THAT I DON'T FEEL
18:29:15 VERY STRONGLY ABOUT AS A PLANNER UNDERSTANDING THE COMP PLAN
18:29:18 AND THE ZONING TRENDS IN THE AREA.
18:29:21 THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING -- ORIGINALLY WAS BORN IN THE
18:29:25 NEIGHBORHOOD, FAMILY-OWNED PROPERTY IN THE AREA, AND HE
18:29:28 ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT, NOTHING IMMEDIATE,
18:29:31 BECAUSE IT'S A EUCLIDEAN DISTRICT AND THERE ARE IN A
18:29:33 SPECIFIC PLANS, BUT WITH THE EVENT TO EVENTUALLY DEVELOP A
18:29:37 SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL COMMERCIAL USE THAT IS CONSISTENT
18:29:41 WITH THE IMPROVING CHARACTER OF THE 40TH STREET CORRIDOR.
18:29:45 THE REPORT AS ABBYE INDICATED BY ALL THE STAFF REVIEW IS ALL
18:29:50 THE STAFF REVIEWING AGENCIES FOUND THE APPLICATION
18:29:53 CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THEIR CRITERIA.
18:29:56 THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
18:29:58 THE GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
18:30:04 EUCLIDEAN DISTRICT.
18:30:05 WE ARE NOT SEEKING ANY WAIVES TO THE APPLICATION.
18:30:07 WHILE IT HAS A HUTTON PLACE ADDRESS, THE PROPERTY FRONTS ON
18:30:11 40TH STREET, IS PART OF THE 40TH STREET CORRIDOR AND FAIRLY
18:30:14 EVIDENT BY THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
18:30:17 IT'S ALSO MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS AREA IS SUBJECT TO A
18:30:21 STUDY THAT HAS BEEN ONGOING WITH REGARD TO AN OVERLAY
18:30:23 DISTRICT FOR THE 40TH STREET CORRIDOR IN THIS AREA.
18:30:27 AND AGAIN, WHILE THERE'S NO GUARANTEE OF ITS ADOPTION, BUT
18:30:31 IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE WILL BE AN ANTICIPATED
18:30:34 REVIEW AND POTENTIAL ADOPTION OF AN OVERLAY FURTHER
18:30:37 REGULATING LAND USE WITH ZONE CRITERIA COME THIS SPRING,
18:30:40 THIS COMING SPRING.
18:30:41 WITH THAT, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST CONSIDERATION OF THE
18:30:45 REZONING FROM RM-24 TO CG.
18:30:48 I WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
18:30:50 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
18:30:53 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM 3?
18:30:56 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:30:57 >> SECOND.
18:30:58 >>FRANK REDDICK: YES, SIR.
18:31:05 OKAY.
18:31:05 YES, SIR.
18:31:05 >> ALAN FRAZIER.
18:31:11 I LIVE ACROSS THE STREET.
18:31:13 7219 NORTH 40th.
18:31:15 AND WHAT ABBYE POINTED OUT IS EVERYTHING IS CG, BUT SHE
18:31:21 PROBABLY DOESN'T KNOW 09% OF THE CG IS OWNED BY THE CITY
18:31:25 WHEN THEY WIDENED 40TH STREET THEY KEPT IT AS A BUFFER.
18:31:31 SO THEN THEY OWN MOST ALL THIS CG IF YOU DO A STUDY FROM
18:31:35 RIVER HILLS DOWN TO THE RIVER.
18:31:38 I THINK IT'S NOT -- I THINK IT SHOULD BE A PD, BECAUSE OF A
18:31:48 CONVENIENCE STORE, AND IT WOULD JUST -- IF YOU LOOK AT THE
18:31:53 CRIME STATISTICS THERE'S NONE NORTH OF 40th BUT A LOT
18:31:56 SOUTH OF 40th.
18:31:57 THE CITY PUT A LOT OF MONEY INTO MAKING 40th BEAUTY
18:32:01 BEAUTIFUL, AND THIS WOULD MAKE IT UNBEAUTIFUL.
18:32:05 I THINK A STRAIGHT CG ZONING HAS A CAPACITY TO DO.
18:32:10 ALSO, ON THE APPLICATION I MENTIONED, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S
18:32:14 RELEVANT BUT THE APPLICANT, IT WAS CERTIFIED WITH GENERAL
18:32:20 RHODES, AND THEN THEY CHANGED OWNERSHIP, AND MR. RHODESED
18:32:24 PUT IN THE BUT THE FINAL CERTIFICATION STILL HAS GENERAL
18:32:27 RHODES.
18:32:28 SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT AFFECTS EVERYTHING LEGALLY.
18:32:46 YOU KNOW WHAT?
18:32:47 I WOULD JUST ASK THAT YOU REMAND IT BACK TO STAFF AND
18:32:50 POSSIBLY DO A PD ZONING RATHER THAN A STRAIGHT CG.
18:32:53 BECAUSE YOU HAVE A BIG INVESTMENT IN 40TH STREET.
18:32:56 AND FROM THERE YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO MAKE IT A NICE PLACE.
18:33:03 THE ZONING WE HAVE COMING PRETTY SOON.
18:33:09 ALSO, THEY TOLD ME IT'S NOT RELATED BUT ALL THE TREES -- NOT
18:33:14 ALL THE TREES BUT A LOT OF THE TREES WERE CUT AND THERE'S
18:33:16 SOME TREE VIOLATION.
18:33:18 SHE SAID THAT'S NOT RELATED TO THE ZONING.
18:33:21 IT SHOULD BE.
18:33:22 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I JUST WANT TO ASK STAFF A QUESTION.
18:33:26 MRS. FEELEY, I THINK IF I AM READING THIS CORRECTLY, BECAUSE
18:33:30 I BELIEVE IT'S A EUCLIDEAN ZONING.
18:33:32 AM I RIGHT ABOUT THAT?
18:33:36 NO, I'M ASKING THE STAFF.
18:33:38 BUT STAY THERE BECAUSE IT PERTAINS TO ONE OF YOUR QUESTIONS.
18:33:40 I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE THERE.
18:33:43 COME ON UP.
18:33:44 ON THE EUCLIDEAN ZONING, IT DOES INCLUDE CONVENIENCE STORES
18:33:48 AS PART OF IT AND THEY WOULD PROBABLY HAVE TO COME BACK FOR
18:33:52 A SPECIAL USE IF THERE WAS LIQUOR OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
18:33:54 BUT THEY CAN PUT A CONVENIENCE STORE THERE ONCE IT'S ZONED
18:33:58 EUCLIDEAN REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THE PD IS THERE OR
18:34:02 NOT, CORRECT?
18:34:03 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:34:08 ON THE APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES WOULD
18:34:10 REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE THAT WOULD COME BEFORE THIS CITY
18:34:13 COUNCIL, AND THEY DID INDICATE THAT MR. FRAZIER, ON NUMEROUS
18:34:19 DISCUSSIONS, IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL IS WHEN YOU GO TO
18:34:23 THAT, WOULD ALLOW FOR ANY USES THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED IN
18:34:27 THERE.
18:34:27 ONE OTHER THING PARTICULARLY IS NUMBER ONE, THEY WOULD NOT
18:34:32 GET ACCESS ON A LOCAL STREET SO THERE WOULD NOT BE ACCESS ON
18:34:36 PINE TREE OR HUTTON.
18:34:37 THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET ACCESS ONTO 40th.
18:34:41 THE OTHER IS THAT ALL REQUIRED BUFFERING TO ADJACENT
18:34:45 PROPERTIES WOULD BE REQUIRED AND COULD NOT BE WAIVED OR
18:34:51 LESSENED IN ANY WAY BY THIS APPLICATION.
18:34:53 SO THAT WAS OUR OTHER DISCUSSION.
18:34:57 >>MIKE SUAREZ: AND THE POINT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE, MS.
18:35:00 FEELEY, IS BECAUSE IT BEING A PD WOULD NOT ELIMINATE THE
18:35:05 FACT THAT -- IT BASED ON WHATEVER THE PD IS GOING TO ASK
18:35:08 FOR, OR IS EUCLIDEAN STILL GOING TO ALLOW IT?
18:35:13 SO EITHER WAY IT COULD BE A CONVENIENCE STORE.
18:35:15 SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE MR. FRAZIER KNEW THAT YOU ARE
18:35:18 ASKING FOR A PD.
18:35:19 YOU ARE ASKING THEM TO BE REMANDED WHICH WE DON'T DO, BY THE
18:35:22 WAY, FOR PD.
18:35:24 A PD CAN BE A CONVENIENCE STORE.
18:35:27 >> YEAH, I KNOW.
18:35:28 >>ABBYE FEELEY: NO CONVENIENCE STORE --
18:35:36 >> OKAY, BUT AS FAR AS THE CG, IT'S ALL OWNED BY THE CITY.
18:35:39 SO THE ONLY ONE IS THE ONE THAT WAS GRANDFATHERED IN.
18:35:45 SO I DON'T THINK THE INTENT WAS TO MAKE IT A CG OR OTHERWISE
18:35:48 THE CITY WOULD BE --
18:35:50 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTOOD IF
18:35:53 THOUGH IT'S A PD, IT COULD STILL BE A CONVENIENCE STORE.
18:35:57 THAT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING.
18:35:57 >> YEAH.
18:35:59 AND THEN THE OTHER THING ABOUT THE APPLICATION, IS THAT
18:36:01 KOSHER?
18:36:03 >>ABBYE FEELEY: I HAVE AN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE EXISTING
18:36:05 PROPERTY OWNER, THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER IN MY FILE, AND
18:36:09 THAT'S HOW IT HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND I
18:36:12 DID CHECK THAT WITH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND I DO BELIEVE
18:36:14 THIS APPLICATION IS IN ORDER TO BE HEARD BY THIS COUNCIL
18:36:16 THIS EVENING.
18:36:17 >>MIKE SUAREZ: THANK YOU, SIR.
18:36:21 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK
18:36:23 ON ITEM NUMBER 3?
18:36:24 ALL RIGHT.
18:36:24 APPLICANT?
18:36:28 JOHN LAROCCA: I WILL SIMPLY --
18:36:31 >>FRANK REDDICK: LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION BEFORE YOU
18:36:33 START.
18:36:35 DID YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR CLIENT PLANS ON DOING?
18:36:38 YOU MENTIONED RETAIL.
18:36:39 >> MY CLIENT HAS NO IMMEDIATE PLANS BUT I ASKED WHAT MIGHT
18:36:42 BE ANTICIPATED PLANS ABSENT THE CURRENT ZONING WHICH WOULD
18:36:46 PERMIT ANYWHERE FROM 15 TO 19 UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL BY RIGHT
18:36:53 BASED ON THE CURRENT ZONING, OR THE COMP PLAN WOULD ALLOW
18:36:56 CONSIDERATION I BELIEVE UP TO 28 UNITS IF THIS THERE ARE
18:37:03 AMENDMENT TO THE LEE ZONING.
18:37:05 BUT KNOWING THE DISTRICT SO LONG AND THE DISCUSSION MIGHT
18:37:09 COME UP IN EUCLIDEAN DISTRICT WHAT ARE THE PLANS, HE
18:37:11 MENTIONED TO ME SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL, OR MEDICAL
18:37:17 OFFICE, USES LIKE THAT.
18:37:18 >>FRANK REDDICK: OKAY.
18:37:21 >> HE DID NOT MENTION AN INTENTION OF HAVING A CONVENIENCE
18:37:27 STORE.
18:37:27 AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT CONVENIENCE STORES, THERE ARE CERTAIN
18:37:29 USES THAT MIGHT OCCUR IN A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING TO GO
18:37:33 THROUGH SITE REVIEW CONSIDERATION, AND DEPENDING ON IT MAY
18:37:37 REQUIRE SPECIAL APPROVAL AND A SEPARATE APPROVAL OF THIS
18:37:40 COUNCIL.
18:37:40 >>FRANK REDDICK: OKAY.
18:37:41 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT.
18:37:46 I HAVE ONE MORE ITEM.
18:37:48 I DID SPEAK WITH TOM DOCK WITH THE PLANNING -- LACHONE DOCK
18:37:53 WITH THE PLANNING SESSION, AND WE DID START AT THE TEMPLE
18:37:58 CREST 40TH STREET AREA AFTER WE COMPLETED THE FORM BASED
18:38:02 CODE. THIS AREA DID HAVE SOME PLANNING DONE AND IT IS THE
18:38:06 INTENT OF THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BRING YOU BACK AN OVERLAY
18:38:08 DISTRICT FOR THIS AREA IN JANUARY-FEBRUARY TIME.
18:38:13 SO THIS GOING TONIGHT TO A CG, IF AN OVERLAY IS PLACED, ALL
18:38:19 DESIGN STANDARD WILL BE APPLICABLE.
18:38:20 THIS WON'T BE VESTED TO ANYTHING UNTIL THE TIME OF
18:38:24 DEVELOPMENT AS TO WHICH THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH
18:38:26 ANYTHING RELATED TO DESIGN OR FORM ON THE PROPERTY.
18:38:30 THANK YOU.
18:38:30 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS?
18:38:33 >>HARRY COHEN: BUT IN FAIRNESS, I MEAN, THAT MAY OR MAY NOT
18:38:36 HAPPEN.
18:38:36 >>ABBYE FEELEY: CORRECT.
18:38:39 >>HARRY COHEN: SO WE CAN'T REALLY DEPEND ON THAT.
18:38:42 I MEAN, IT MIGHT HAPPEN BUT, YOU KNOW.
18:38:45 >>ABBYE FEELEY: FROM MY DISCUSSION WITH MS. DOCK, I KNOW
18:38:48 THAT THE PROPERTIES ALONG THIS CORRIDOR WILL BE REQUESTED TO
18:38:50 BE ZONED TO CG TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT UNDERLYING LAND
18:38:53 USE OF THE CMU 35 AND TO GO WITH THE VISION OF CREATING A
18:38:57 MIXED USE CORRIDOR IN THE AREA.
18:39:00 WITH DESIGN STANDARDS, YOU ARE RIGHT.
18:39:03 IT NEED TO BE APPROPRIATE TODAY, WHETHER OR NOT THE OVERLAY
18:39:06 IS FORTHCOMING.
18:39:07 >>HARRY COHEN: BUT YOU ARE SAYING YOUR STRONG SENSE IS THAT
18:39:12 IT IS FORTHCOMING?
18:39:13 >>ABBYE FEELEY: YES.
18:39:14 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE
18:39:18 APPLICANT?
18:39:19 ALL RIGHT.
18:39:19 MOTION TO CLOSE?
18:39:21 MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
18:39:22 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
18:39:24 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
18:39:25 OPPOSED?
18:39:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
18:39:31 READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
18:39:33 GENERAL VICINITY OF 7411 NORTH HUTTON PLACE IN THE CITY OF
18:39:38 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
18:39:40 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-24 RESIDENTIAL
18:39:43 MULTIFAMILY TO CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
18:39:45 DATE.
18:39:45 >>YVONNE CAPIN: SECOND.
18:39:47 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION FROM MR. MANISCALCO.
18:39:49 SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN CAPIN.
18:39:52 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
18:39:53 OPPOSED?
18:39:53 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
18:39:58 NEXT READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON 23 AUGUST AT 9:30 A.M.
18:40:02 >>FRANK REDDICK: ITEM NUMBER 4.
18:40:04 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT.
18:40:06 ITEM NUMBER 4 ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS REZ 1875.
18:40:11 IT'S LOCATED AT 5702 INTERBAY BOULEVARD AND THE REQUEST
18:40:16 TONIGHT IS FROM PD BACK TO AN RS-50.
18:40:19 THIS PROPERTY WAS ACTUALLY PDED IN 1999 FROM RS-50 AND CM TO
18:40:26 ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
18:40:30 OFFICE AT THE CORNER OF INTERBAY AND RUSSELL.
18:40:36 I WILL HOLD THAT.
18:40:38 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:40:44 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:40:45 WE MOVE DOWN TO AGAIN TO THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
18:40:50 FOR THIS NEXT CASE.
18:40:52 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT IN THE BALLAST POINT
18:40:58 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:40:59 THE SITE IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 700 YARDS FROM THE BALLAST
18:41:04 POINT PARK.
18:41:06 THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY.
18:41:08 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS LOCATED A MAIL AWAY TO THE WEST.
18:41:14 THE SITE IS, SINCE IT IS ON INTERBAY, IT IS WITHIN THE
18:41:18 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
18:41:20 IT IS ALSO WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION AS WELL.
18:41:24 ONTO THE AERIAL.
18:41:26 THE SUBJECT SITE HERE.
18:41:28 THIS IS RUSSELL.
18:41:30 INTERBAY.
18:41:30 SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE.
18:41:32 AS YOU CAN SEE, AS YOU GO WEST DOWN INTERBAY --
18:41:39 >>HARRY COHEN: WE HAVE ACTUALLY LOST YOU NOW.
18:41:40 WE DON'T HAVE THE OVERHEAD ANYPLACE.
18:41:42 WE DON'T HAVE IN THE FRONT OF US AND WE ALSO DON'T HAVE IT
18:41:45 ON THE PROJECTOR.
18:41:46 >>YVONNE CAPIN: SOME OF US HAVE IT.
18:41:49 MOST OF US DON'T.
18:41:49 >> WE HAD IT UP THERE BUT NOW WE HAVE -- WE NEED -- THERE WE
18:41:58 GO.
18:41:58 >>DAVID HEY: AGAIN, HERE IS INTERBAY.
18:42:04 AS YOU MOVE WEST DOWN INTERBAY, SINGLE-FAMILY.
18:42:08 AT THIS INTERSECTION, THERE IS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES.
18:42:12 THIS IS BAYSHORE AND INTERBAY SHOPPING PLAZA.
18:42:15 THESE ARE SOME TOWNHOMES.
18:42:18 AND THEN TO THE SOUTH IS SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE AS WELL.
18:42:24 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:42:26 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES IN THAT TAN COLOR
18:42:30 ARE THE RESIDENTIAL 10.
18:42:34 GOING EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, IT GOES UP TO THE
18:42:36 RESIDENTIAL 20.
18:42:38 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
18:42:40 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST, FOUND THAT
18:42:43 THE PROPOSAL TO BRING BACK SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THIS
18:42:48 SITE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
18:42:52 ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
18:42:56 CATEGORY.
18:42:58 BASED OWN THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FIND IT QUINT THE
18:43:00 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:43:01 THANK YOU.
18:43:02 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:43:09 THANK YOU, DAVID.
18:43:10 AS I MENTIONED THE REQUEST TONIGHT AT 5702 INTERBAY IS FROM
18:43:13 PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, BACK
18:43:16 TO RS-50, TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE SINGLE-FAMILY
18:43:21 LOTS.
18:43:22 THE LOT IS CONFIGURED WITH 181.25 BY 112.65 WITH AN ANGLE
18:43:30 ALONG RUSSELL STREET PER THE RS-50 STANDARDS, EACH LOT WOULD
18:43:34 NEED TO MEASURE A MINIMUM OF 50 BY 100.
18:43:38 AS I PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED TO YOU, THIS WAS REZONED IN '99
18:43:42 FROM RS-50 AND CM TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF BUSINESS
18:43:47 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AT THE CORNER.
18:43:49 THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE BACK TO RS-50 TO ALLOW FOR
18:43:54 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
18:43:56 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG ONE BLOCK WEST OF BAYSHORE
18:44:00 BOULEVARD.
18:44:06 HERE IS THE AERIAL.
18:44:07 BAYSHORE TO THE EAST AS DAVID MENTIONED, RUSSELL.
18:44:11 AND I PUT THE ZONING ATLAS UP.
18:44:14 YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE'S A SERIES OF CM TO THE EAST.
18:44:18 PART OF IT IS TOWNHOMES.
18:44:20 YOU CAN SEE THIS ON YOUR ATLAS.
18:44:23 SOME OF IT IS THE LOWER INTENSITY USES.
18:44:27 THEN RIGHT HERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF RUSSELL IS CONSTRUCTION
18:44:32 OF THREE HOMES.
18:44:49 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:44:53 IT'S BEEN A COUPLE OF OTHER BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICES.
18:44:57 THERE'S A SMALL PD HERE ALSO.
18:45:00 THAT WAS FOR RESIDENTIAL JUST IN CASE YOU HAD QUESTIONS
18:45:05 ABOUT THAT.
18:45:06 WE ARE GOING TO TRAVEL ONTO THE SOUTH SIDE, INTERBAY, HEADED
18:45:11 DOWN THIS WAY, AND THEN COME BACK UP, AND TO THE NORTH SIDE.
18:45:16 AND THEN BACK UP.
18:45:27 TO THE SUBJECT.
18:45:36 I'M SORRY, WE ARE GOING TO COME BACK TO THAT CORNER DIRECTLY
18:45:38 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF INTERBAY AND RUSSELL.
18:45:41 THAT'S PART OF THAT CM.
18:45:44 NOW HEADED BACK DOWN SOUTHWEST.
18:45:52 AND THEN AT THE CORNER OF INTERBAY THAT I DISCUSSED WITH
18:45:58 YOU.
18:46:00 STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST FOR THE APPLICATION FROM PD BACK TO
18:46:04 RS-50.
18:46:06 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:46:08 TO BE CONSISTENT.
18:46:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
18:46:11 APPLICANT?
18:46:11 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: ADDRESS 3700 BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA.
18:46:22 I HAVE THE PLEASURE OF REPRESENTING I'M RAN HOMES, HIS
18:46:29 OFFICE IS CURRENTLY ON THE SITE.
18:46:30 HE SIMPLY WANTS TO GO BACK TO THE RS-50 ZONING DESIGNATION
18:46:34 TO EVENTUALLY BUILD HOMES OPEN THIS PROPERTY, CONSIDERING
18:46:38 THE PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT ON INTERBAY BOULEVARD.
18:46:40 I RECEIVED NO OBJECTIONS FROM THE NOTIFICATION ON THIS
18:46:43 PROJECT.
18:46:46 MR. HEY AND MS. FEELEY HAVE THOROUGHLY SUMMARIZED THE
18:46:51 ELEMENTS OF THIS PROJECT.
18:46:52 AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
18:46:56 I RESERVE THE REMAINDER OF MY COMMENTS FOR REBUTTAL IF
18:47:00 NECESSARY.
18:47:00 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
18:47:01 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4?
18:47:06 I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
18:47:08 SECOND BY MS. CAPIN.
18:47:10 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
18:47:12 OPPOSED?
18:47:13 ALL RIGHT.
18:47:13 >>YVONNE CAPIN: FILE REZ 18-75.
18:47:22 ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
18:47:24 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
18:47:26 5702 INTERBAY BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
18:47:30 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
18:47:33 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE,
18:47:36 BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL, TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,
18:47:40 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:47:41 >> SECOND.
18:47:42 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MS. CAPIN.
18:47:46 SECONDED BY MIRANDA.
18:47:48 ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
18:47:49 OPPOSED?
18:47:50 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
18:47:52 NEXT READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE 23 AUGUST AT 9:30 A.M.
18:47:56 >>FRANK REDDICK: GO TO ITEM NUMBER 5.
18:48:00 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:48:04 ITEM NUMBER 5 IS REZ 18-30.
18:48:06 IT'S A REZONING REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY AT 6911 NORTH
18:48:09 19th STREET TO REZONE FROM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS TO SEMINOLE
18:48:15 HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT FOR DETACHED RESIDENTIAL.
18:48:20 FROM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
18:48:22 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:48:26 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:48:27 WE MOVE TO THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT CASE.
18:48:29 [RUSTLING PAPERS] AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
18:48:33 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
18:48:37 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS .9 MILES TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT
18:48:41 SITE.
18:48:43 AMAZINGLY IT IS IN EVACUATION ZONE E.
18:48:47 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS MCDOUGALD PARK
18:48:56 HALF MAIL WEST UNTO SUBJECT SITE.
18:48:59 CURRENTLY THE SITE IS VACANT.
18:49:02 HERE IS THE AERIAL.
18:49:03 SUBJECT SITE.
18:49:05 19th STREET.
18:49:09 THIS IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
18:49:12 AND THIS IS SLIGH MIDDLE SCHOOL TO THE SOUTH.
18:49:16 THERE IS SOME COMMERCIAL USES FURTHER TO THE WEST ON SLIGH.
18:49:21 AS YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE AND
18:49:25 ALL THE PROPERTIES SURROUNDING IT ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL 10
18:49:29 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
18:49:31 THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FOR THAT AREA IS TO THE SOUTH ALONG
18:49:36 SLIGH.
18:49:40 SLIGH AND NORTH 22ND, THERE IS SOME COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY
18:49:42 AROUND THE SCHOOL AND SOME LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES FURTHER TO
18:49:46 THE EAST.
18:49:48 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE SUBJECT SITE AND
18:49:53 FOUND THAT NEW RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS LIKE THIS WOULD BE
18:49:56 CONSIDERED INFILL.
18:49:57 THIS IS ENCOURAGED BY THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH
18:50:00 ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT LANDS TO ACCOMMODATE
18:50:03 TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION.
18:50:05 AND BE ITS SHARE OF THE REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD GROWTH.
18:50:08 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
18:50:12 URBAN VILLAGE, AN AREA OF THE CITY THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE
18:50:15 PLAN SEEKS TO DIRECT THE GREATEST SHARE OF THE IN-FILL
18:50:20 DEVELOPMENT.
18:50:20 OVERALL THE REQUESTED REZONING IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE
18:50:24 WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, AND CONSISTENT WITH THE
18:50:26 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:50:29 SO THIS WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
18:50:34 PLAN.
18:50:35 THANK YOU.
18:50:35 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: BEFORE I BEGIN MY PRESENTATION, THE STAFF
18:50:46 REPORT WHERE I CREATED ADDITIONAL FINDINGS.
18:51:00 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:51:03 DAVID SHOWED YOU AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THE SUBJECT
18:51:05 PROPERTY.
18:51:06 THIS IS THE ZONING MAP.
18:51:09 AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL
18:51:13 ZONING DISTRICT.
18:51:14 AND THIS PROPERTY BACK HERE IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL
18:51:19 GENERAL ALONG SLIGH.
18:51:26 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
18:51:27 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
18:51:36 I AM GOING GO DOWN AND COME BACK AROUND.
18:51:39 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
18:51:41 THIS IS A FAMILY HOME.
18:51:43 6905-19th STREET.
18:51:47 YOU CAN SEE IT'S FACING A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.
18:51:52 FURTHER DOWN THE STREET.
18:51:54 THIS IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
18:51:56 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE.
18:52:00 ACROSS THE STREET.
18:52:01 HERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.
18:52:04 50-FOOT LOT.
18:52:06 AND IN THE CORNER.
18:52:17 HERE IS THE PLAN THEY ARE PROPOSING.
18:52:18 BASICALLY THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ALLOWS
18:52:21 FOR 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS WITH 50-FOOT IN WIDTH.
18:52:25 THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OVER 200 FEET LONG SO THE APPLICANT
18:52:33 IS ABLE TO HAVE TWO DISTINCT LOTS.
18:52:36 THIS WILL BE LOT 2.
18:52:41 THIS IS LOT 1.
18:52:43 AND THEN LOT 3, THEIR OWN DRIVEWAY, IT HAS TO BE IN THE
18:52:49 REAR.
18:52:50 AND THEN LOT 4.
18:52:55 SO THERE'S FOUR HOUSES.
18:52:57 TWO IN THE FRONT.
18:52:59 TWO IN THE BACK.
18:53:00 BECAUSE THIS QUALIFIES UNDER THE DEFINITION OF A REGULARLY
18:53:05 SHAPED LOT, THOSE MUST BE EITHER IN SPECIAL USE OR THROUGH A
18:53:10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
18:53:10 THE ONLY WAIVER THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING IS SEMINOLE
18:53:14 HEIGHTS' HAS A BUILT-TO WITH TWO YARD.
18:53:22 64 FEET AND 9 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
18:53:27 SO THE ONLY WAIVER TO THE FRONT YARD FOR LOT 1 IS 40 FEET 6
18:53:36 INCHES FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
18:53:39 LOT 3 IS 28 FEET AND FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE.
18:53:47 THEY ARE COMPLIANT WITH ALL OF THE OTHER SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
18:53:51 RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS, HEIGHT, AND ALL THE OTHER BASIC
18:53:56 REQUIREMENTS.
18:53:57 SO TO APPROVE THE REGULARLY SHAPED LOTS AGAIN BECAUSE OF THE
18:54:06 EXCESSIVE DEPTH OF THE PROPERTY.
18:54:07 FUR WERE TO APPROVE 24 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE
18:54:11 WAIVER TABLE, SUGGESTED SOME OF THE INFORMATION FOR THE LOT
18:54:16 AREA NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED AND THERE'S ONE SPELLING ERROR.
18:54:22 THERE ARE A COUPLE CLARIFICATIONS THAT NEED TO BE VETTED
18:54:26 THROUGH NATIONAL RESOURCES.
18:54:29 STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
18:54:32 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:54:35 IF YOU GRANT THE WAIVER, A MOTION --
18:54:41 DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT THIS TIME?
18:54:42 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
18:54:43 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
18:54:45 APPLICANT?
18:54:47 APPLICANT?
18:54:48 >> MY NAME --
18:55:00 I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH --
18:55:02 >>FRANK REDDICK: TURN IT BACK AROUND.
18:55:14 THERE.
18:55:15 THERE.
18:55:15 >> THE ONLY THING IS WE MEET EVERYTHING IS CONSISTENT.
18:55:23 WE TRY TO COVER THE NEEDS.
18:55:28 AND WE ARE CREATING A RETENTION POND TO RETAIN THE WATER
18:55:38 FROM THE PROPERTY IN THE BACK.
18:55:40 DRAINING THE TWO PROPERTIES IN THE FRONT.
18:55:46 WE HAVE 21-FOOT ACCESS FOR THE REAR PROPERTY.
18:55:52 AND HAVE THE SAME CONSIDERATION.
18:56:02 WE HAVE LARGE LOT.
18:56:04 THERE ARE NOT MANY OF THEM.
18:56:12 SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
18:56:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
18:56:18 ALL RIGHT.
18:56:18 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5?
18:56:21 PLEASE COME FORWARD.
18:56:21 >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CAMERON.
18:56:34 MY HUSBAND AND I LIVE AT 1924 EAST 4TH STREET WHICH IS JUST
18:56:35 UP THE ROAD. [RUSTLING PAPERS] WE HAVE SOME CONCERNS.
18:56:35 THAT NEIGHBORHOOD HAS VERY LARGE LOTS THROUGH THAT PORTION
18:56:35 OF SEMINOLE HEIGHTS. WE HAVE SOME CONCERNS IT DOES SEEM
18:56:46 LIKE A LITTLE BIT OF -- WITH SO MANY RESIDENTS ON A SMALL
18:56:50 LOT.
18:56:52 ALSO, WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES THROUGHOUT OUR
18:56:56 NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY DON'T SEEM TO BE GETTING ADDRESSED VERY
18:56:59 QUICKLY.
18:57:01 ADDING ADDITIONAL RENTERS, THERE IS GOING TO BE A CONCERN
18:57:05 FOR ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS.
18:57:06 WE ALREADY HAVE THAT ISSUE WITH TREMENDOUS NUMBER IN OUR
18:57:11 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:57:11 AND LOTS NOT BEING MAINTAINED.
18:57:13 SO THIS IS DEFINITELY A CONCERN NOT ONLY FOR OUR RESIDENT
18:57:19 BUT OTHER RESIDENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:57:21 SO THERE ARE DEFINITELY CONCERNS THERE.
18:57:23 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER
18:57:25 5?
18:57:28 PETITIONER, HAVE YOU GOT ANY MORE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?
18:57:32 YES, SIR?
18:57:34 >> AS YOU CAN SEE, AS YOU CAN SEE, JUST EAST OF THE
18:57:49 PROPERTY, WE HAVE SEVERAL LOTS.
18:57:52 OKAY, WE HAVE SEVERAL LOTS, THAT THEY ARE EVEN SMALLER THAN
18:57:56 THE LOTS THAT WE ARE CREATING.
18:57:58 TWO OF THE LOTS WE ARE CREATING, THEY ARE 50 BY 100.
18:58:02 THE OTHER LOTS, THEY ARE OVER THAT SIZE.
18:58:07 YOU CAN SEE PROGRESS WITH SMALLER LOTS THROUGHOUT.
18:58:11 STARTED THROUGHOUT THE AREA.
18:58:13 >> MR. MIRANDA.
18:58:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: PETITIONER MENTIONED THESE HOUSES THAT
18:58:19 YOU ARE GOING TO BUILD. ARE THEY FOR SALE OR WHAT?
18:58:23 >> THEY ARE FOR SALE.
18:58:24 YES, SIR.
18:58:36 YOU CAN SEE A PICTURE, THROUGHOUT THE AREA.
18:58:39 PRETTY MUCH THEY ARE GOING TO BE -- NICE HOUSE WAS FRONT
18:58:43 PORCH AND --
18:58:45 >> WHAT'S THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE?
18:58:46 >> THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE WILL BE VARIOUS.
18:58:49 THEY ARE 2100 SQUARE FEET OVER ALL AND THE ONES IN THE BACK,
18:58:54 THEY ARE CLOSE TO 2600 OVERALL.
18:58:56 INCLUDING CARPORT.
18:59:00 FRONT PORCH.
18:59:03 LANAI.
18:59:03 >> THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH?
18:59:10 >> THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH.
18:59:12 THE ONES IN THE FRONT FOUR BEDROOMS, TWO BATH THE ONES IN
18:59:16 THE BACK.
18:59:17 YES.
18:59:17 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
18:59:20 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
18:59:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:59:25 >> MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
18:59:28 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
18:59:29 ALL IN FAVOR?
18:59:30 OPPOSED?
18:59:30 MR. MIRANDA.
18:59:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NUMBER 5, REZ 18-30.
18:59:35 AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
18:59:37 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
18:59:40 VICINITY OF 6911 AND 6915 NORTH 19th STREET IN THE CITY
18:59:45 OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION
18:59:47 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
18:59:52 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL, TO SH-PD, SEMINOLE
18:59:56 HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
18:59:59 DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:59:59 >> SECOND.
19:00:01 >>FRANK REDDICK: I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
19:00:04 SECONDED BY MR. MANISCALCO.
19:00:06 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:00:08 OPPOSED?
19:00:08 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:00:13 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON 23 AUGUST AT 9:30
19:00:16 A.M.
19:00:17 >>FRANK REDDICK: ITEM NUMBER 6.
19:00:18 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:00:21 ITEM NUMBER 6 ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS REZ 18-50.
19:00:27 906 EAST SHADOWLAWN AVENUE.
19:00:29 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS FROM SH-RS, SEMINOLE
19:00:33 HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO SH-PD, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
19:00:37 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR PRINCIPLE PARKING.
19:00:40 THERE ARE THREE WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED THIS
19:00:42 EVENING.
19:00:43 THE FIRST IS TO REDUCE THE FRONT, WHICH THIS IS A
19:00:48 THROUGH-LOT.
19:00:49 HAS TWO FRONTS.
19:00:50 SO THIS IS TO REDUCE THE SOUTH FOR PARKING PLACEMENT FROM
19:00:54 THE REQUIRED 15-FOOT SETBACK TO 10 FEET.
19:00:57 THE SECOND WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE FRONT ON THE NORTH FOR
19:01:02 THE PARKING PLACEMENT FROM 15 FEET TO 5 FEET.
19:01:06 AND THE THIRD IS TO REDUCE THE NORTH SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
19:01:10 FROM 15-FOOT TO 5-FOOT WITH PAVEMENT OF FEE IN LIEU AT THE
19:01:13 TIME OF PERMITTING.
19:01:14 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:01:23 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:01:25 STILL REMAINING IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR
19:01:27 THIS CASE.
19:01:29 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
19:01:32 URBAN VILLAGE.
19:01:37 THERE IS TRANSIT ALONG NEBRASKA AVENUE.
19:01:41 AND THE SITE IS NOT IN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
19:01:45 ONTO THE AERIAL.
19:01:49 HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE.
19:01:52 THIS IS SHADOWLAWN AVENUE. THIS IS FRIERSON.
19:01:58 THIS IS NEBRASKA AVENUE.
19:01:59 THIS IS THE ELLIS CAFE TO THE SOUTH.
19:02:05 BASICALLY, FROM HERE OVER, IT GOES DOWN TO SINGLE-FAMILY
19:02:09 DETACHED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
19:02:12 YOU CAN SEE THAT THE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY WORKS ITS WAY UP
19:02:15 NEBRASKA, AND THEN THIS IS HILLSBOROUGH TO THE NORTH.
19:02:19 AND THEN YOU HAVE A LOT OF EXTENSIVE COMMERCIAL FURTHER TO
19:02:23 THE NORTH.
19:02:26 FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:02:30 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTY TO THE EAST AND
19:02:34 WEST ARE ALL COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
19:02:38 IT GETS MORE INTENSIVE TO THE NORTH GOING TO THAT COMMUNITY
19:02:41 COMMERCIAL 35 WHICH ALLOWS CONSIDERATION FOR CI.
19:02:46 AND THEN DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH AND MOVING EAST DOWN
19:02:49 SHADOWLAWN IT GOES DOWN TO A RESIDENTIAL 10 DEVELOPMENT
19:02:52 PATTERN.
19:02:53 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST FOR THE
19:02:56 PRINCIPLE PARKING, DID FIND THAT THE USE WOULD BE CONSISTENT
19:03:01 WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT
19:03:04 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
19:03:05 IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO SUPPORT THE MIXTURE OF USES ALONG
19:03:09 THAT CORRIDOR.
19:03:11 BASED ON THAT, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FIND THE REQUEST
19:03:14 CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:03:17 THANK YOU.
19:03:17 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:03:23 I DO HAVE THE LETTERS THAT CAME INTO MY E-MAIL BOX THIS
19:03:26 AFTERNOON, SEVERAL THAT WERE COPIED TO YOU.
19:03:33 SO I WILL PROVIDE THOSE FOR THE RECORD.
19:03:36 IN ADDITION, I HAVE A REVISION SHEET THAT PROVIDES -- AND I
19:03:41 WILL PASS THAT OUT AS WELL, AND I WILL SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT
19:03:44 THAT IN ONE OF THE ITEMS ON THERE.
19:03:56 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT AS DAVID TALKED ABOUT, AN I
19:04:00 PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, IS FROM SH-RS, SH-PD, TO CONTROLLED
19:04:05 PARKING.
19:04:06 IT'S IN A THROUGH LOT WITH A FRONT ON SHADOWLAWN AND A FRONT
19:04:10 ON FRIERSON.
19:04:12 THE DESIGN THAT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS AN ENTRY ON
19:04:14 SHADOWLAWN AND AN EXIT ON FRIERSON WITH ANGLED PARKING
19:04:18 SPACES.
19:04:20 THE PROPOSED LOT CONTAINS 20 SPACES, AS I MENTIONED THERE
19:04:24 ARE WAIVERS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF THOSE SPACES AS THIS IS
19:04:28 WITHIN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AREA.
19:04:31 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE LOT EAST OF NEBRASKA.
19:04:34 DAVID SHOWED YOU DIRECTLY THE [RUSTLING PAPERS]
19:04:39 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THIS PROPERTY.
19:04:43 THAT WAS DEMOLISHED.
19:04:45 WITH PERMITS IN MAY OF 2017.
19:04:48 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY RETAIL TO THE WEST, AUTO
19:04:51 REPAIR TO THE NORTH, AND RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST AND SOUTH.
19:04:58 THE PROPOSED LAYOUT AS I MENTIONED HAS A ONE-WAY IN AND
19:05:02 ONE-WAY OUT.
19:05:05 I WILL SHOW YOU THE ZONING ATLAS.
19:05:16 THIS IS THE ZONING ATLAS.
19:05:17 YOU SEE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE IN GREEN.
19:05:20 SH-CG THOSE TRANSITION LINES, AND SH-CI UP TO THE NORTH.
19:05:29 THAT BEGINS WITH FRIERSON.
19:05:33 AND TRAVELS UP TO HILLSBOROUGH.
19:05:37 THE PROPERTY AERIAL, I THINK DAVID SHOWED YOU, THIS AERIAL
19:05:42 STILL HAS THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THE PROPERTY.
19:05:54 I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU PICTURES FROM SHADOWLAWN.
19:05:57 THIS WOULD BE WHERE THE ENTRY WOULD BE TO THE PARKING LOT.
19:06:01 AND THEN I WILL TRAVEL BACK AROUND UP TO FRIERSON.
19:06:07 THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH.
19:06:12 THIS IS THE VALUE POND TO THE WEST.
19:06:15 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST.
19:06:22 SITE BUT OVER TO THE SOUTHWEST IS THE ELLIS PARKING AND
19:06:29 ELLIS RESTAURANT.
19:06:31 AND THEN THIS IS ALMOST DIRECTLY SOUTH.
19:06:37 THAT IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY.
19:06:41 SO I DID WANT TO TAKE A PICTURE OF THE BUFFERING THAT'S
19:06:44 THERE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL RIGHT NOW AND SHOW YOU HOW THAT IS
19:06:50 BEING BUFFERED TO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL.
19:06:53 THIS IS THE PROPERTY FROM FRIERSON.
19:06:57 THIS IS THE LOOK FROM FRIERSON BACK WEST -- I'M SORRY, THIS
19:07:01 IS -- THERE IS ONE RESIDENTIAL STREET THAT JOGS IN THERE.
19:07:10 WHERE THE SUBJECT COMES OUT AT THE CORNER HERE AT 9th
19:07:13 AND FRIERSON, THERE'S SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
19:07:19 THAT'S THE PICTURE LOOKING UP 9th.
19:07:22 THIS IS A PICTURE BACK ON FRIERSON LOOKING WEST TOWARD
19:07:28 NEBRASKA.
19:07:29 AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS PREDOMINANTLY THE REAR OF THE
19:07:34 PROPERTY, ALTHOUGH TECHNICALLY THROUGH ZONING IT WOULD BE
19:07:38 THE FRONT.
19:07:39 THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN -- THIS IS APPROACHING THE VALUE
19:07:44 PAWN.
19:07:44 THIS IS THE SUBJECT AND THEN THE VALUE PAWN.
19:07:47 THIS FROM THE CORNER OF FRIERSON AND NEBRASKA LOOKING BACK
19:07:50 SOUTH.
19:08:01 A COUPLE OF ITEMS.
19:08:05 THERE ARE SOME CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE ON THE SITE
19:08:07 PLAN.
19:08:08 TO CORRECT THE TYPE OF LOTS.
19:08:10 SH PD, TOE CORRECT THE WAIVERS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 OF THE
19:08:15 REPORT.
19:08:15 AND TO CORRECT THE SITE PLAN TO REMOVE REAR PARKING
19:08:19 PLACEMENT AS THE NORTH.
19:08:23 THE SIDEWALK ALSO ALONG FRIERSON, THAT MAY NEED TO BE
19:08:30 PARTIALLY PLACED ONTO THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.
19:08:33 THERE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH THERE FOR 6-FOOT SIDEWALKS.
19:08:38 THAT IS THE ONE BULLET ON THE REVISION SHEET.
19:08:41 THAT WOULD NEED TO BE MODIFIED.
19:08:45 AND THE NEXT FINDING IS IN REALS TO THE PARKING PLACEMENT
19:08:52 AND THE ASSOCIATED WAIVER.
19:08:53 AND MIKE CALLAHAN IS HERE FROM URBAN DESIGN TO SPEAK TO THAT
19:08:57 WAIVER AND THE FINDING OF INCONSISTENCY BY URBAN DESIGN IN
19:09:01 RELATION TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE PARKING ALONG FRIERSON.
19:09:05 REALLY, IT'S JUST THE LAST TWO SPACES THAT ARE ON FRIERSON
19:09:09 THAT 15-FOOT TO THE 5-FOOT REDUCTION.
19:09:13 THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CODE SPEAKS TO HAVING PARKING PLACED 15
19:09:18 FEET BACK.
19:09:19 AND THAT IS BEING REDUCED DOWN TO 5.
19:09:22 AND STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE THOSE TWO SPACES COME OFF AND
19:09:25 THE PARKING BE PLACED BACK AT THE 15 FEET AND THE BUFFERING
19:09:29 BEING LESS IN THAT AREA.
19:09:34 LASTLY,
19:09:36 TRANSPORTATION HAD A COMMENT RELATED TO THE SIDEWALK
19:09:39 EASEMENT ALONG FRIERSON.
19:09:41 THAT DOES NEED TO BE PARTIALLY ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.
19:09:44 THEY WOULD NEED TO PROVIDE THE NOTATION AS REQUESTED BY
19:09:49 TRANSPORTATION.
19:09:52 I WOULD JUST ASK THAT PRIOR TO COUNCIL TAKING ANY ACTION WE
19:09:55 FIGURE OUT WHAT ELSE MAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED ON THE REVISION
19:09:59 SHEET.
19:10:00 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
19:10:03 >>HARRY COHEN: JUST TO BE CLEAR -- [RUSTLING PAPERS]
19:10:09 >> JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE PARKING PLACEMENT HAS A 15 FAT LINE
19:10:19 PER THE CODE, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CODE, TO ALLOW BUFFERING IN
19:10:26 PARKING PLACEMENT IN THIS AREA.
19:10:28 SO IN ORDER TO COMPLY, IT WOULD MEAN THESE SPACES BE
19:10:35 ELIMINATED.
19:10:36 YOU HAVE SEEN US COME HERE ON OCCASIONS WITH THE CODE, TO
19:10:43 PUT IN PLACE THESE OBJECTIVES FOR THE -- AREAS.
19:10:51 IF IT'S COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO LEAVE IT THE WAY THAT IT IS,
19:10:55 WE WILL JUST CHANGE THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND
19:10:58 SECOND READING.
19:10:59 OR BEFORE YOU ADOPT IT.
19:11:00 BUT THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THERE.
19:11:03 THERE'S NO WAY TO JUST PARTIALLY DO IT.
19:11:12 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
19:11:14 >> MAKE CALLAHAN, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN.
19:11:21 UNFORTUNATELY, I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN.
19:11:23 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:11:26 ANYONE ELSE THAT PLANS ON SPEAKING TONIGHT AND HAS NOT BEEN
19:11:30 SWORN, PLEASE STAND.
19:11:31 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
19:11:37 >> I DO.
19:11:39 COUNCIL, AS ABBYE MENTIONED, WE WORK ALMOST DAILY IN
19:11:48 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, AND WE FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND SUPPORT
19:11:51 ADDITIONAL PARKING ALONG THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS IN
19:11:55 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS.
19:11:58 IT'S NEEDED.
19:11:59 THE APPLICANT HAS, I THINK, DONE A GOOD JOB ON THE PARKING
19:12:04 LOT.
19:12:04 HOWEVER, THE TWO WAIVERS THAT ABBYE TALKED ABOUT, THERE'S
19:12:09 15-FOOT SETBACK FOR PARKING.
19:12:14 WE WERE PRETTY ADAMANT ABOUT THAT AND THE DEVELOPMENTS AS
19:12:20 THEY COME INTO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS.
19:12:21 THE FIRST WAIVER ALONG SHADOWLAWN AT THE SOUTH END -- IF I
19:12:26 CAN SHOW YOU ON THE ELMO.
19:12:31 IT'S 10 FEET BUT IT -- I THINK IT'S AN AMENABLE REQUEST.
19:12:41 WE ARE OKAY WITH THAT.
19:12:42 HOWEVER, ON THE NORTH END -- AND THAT'S THE ONE THAT I THINK
19:12:46 WE HAVE THE MOST PROBLEM WITH, AS ABBYE POINTED OUT.
19:12:50 THAT'S THE 15-FOOT.
19:12:52 THOSE TWO PARKING SPACES SIT RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT.
19:12:58 WE HAVE BEEN VERY CONSISTENT IN UPHOLDING THESE PARKING
19:13:01 SETBACKS UNDER NEW CONSTRUCTION.
19:13:04 AND THIS WAIVER IS JUST A LITTLE MORE THAN WE CAN DO
19:13:08 ADMINISTRATIVELY AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UPHOLD IT SO
19:13:12 STAFF REQUESTS REMOVAL OF THESE TWO SPACES AS THEY CLEARLY
19:13:16 CONFLICT WITH THE CODE.
19:13:17 ULTIMATELY WHAT ABBYE SAID REDUCE BY 2 FROM 20 TO 18 PARKING
19:13:24 SPACES, THE REMOVAL OF ALSO THE ASSOCIATED WAIVER TO THE
19:13:30 NORTH, AND CODE COMPLIANCE FOR LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING
19:13:34 AGAIN, IN THAT NORTHERN AREA.
19:13:35 >>MIKE SUAREZ: IS THERE ANY ATTEMPT TO KIND OF SPLIT THE
19:13:41 DIFFERENCE?
19:13:42 MAYBE MOVING THOSE SPACES BACK TO REDUCE ONE?
19:13:46 BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY ONE IS TEN FOOT WAIVER.
19:13:48 THE OTHER ONE IS A 5-FOOT WAIVER.
19:13:50 >> WE PLAYED AROUND WITH IT DIFFERENT WAYS.
19:13:54 AND 90 DEGREES.
19:14:00 >>MIKE SUAREZ: THE REASON I AM ASKING IS BECAUSE YOU HAD
19:14:02 SAID, YOU KNOW, THE WAIVER, THE 5 FAT WAIVER, THE D.O.T.
19:14:10 RULES, IT'S STILL A WAIVER AS OPPOSED TO THE 10-FOOT WAIVER
19:14:13 WHICH SEEMS TO BE THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE.
19:14:16 >> YES.
19:14:16 AND THE REASON FOR THAT, COUNCILMAN, IS THE LANDSCAPING AND
19:14:19 THE BUFFERING AREAS REALLY WON'T BE AFFECTED ON THE SOUTH AS
19:14:23 IT WOULD ON THE NORTH.
19:14:26 IT'S A MUCH GREATER BUFFER.
19:14:28 >>MIKE SUAREZ: THANKS FOR EXPLAINING THAT BECAUSE I WAS
19:14:30 THINKING YOU COULD SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE SOMEHOW.
19:14:33 THANK YOU.
19:14:33 >>FRANK REDDICK: PETITIONER?
19:14:35 >> PATRICIA ORTIZ, I'M WITH ORTIZ PLANNING SOLUTIONS, AND
19:14:42 HERE ON BEHALF OF DONCO HOLDINGS.
19:14:46 WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:14:49 PARKING IS A VERY USE ISSUE.
19:14:51 IN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS ALONG THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS, BOTH
19:14:54 FLORIDA AND NEBRASKA.
19:14:56 AND IF IN THIS CASE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS EXPRESSED CONCERNS
19:15:01 OVER STREET PARKING INTERNAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND
19:15:06 CIRCUITOUS PARKING OR TRAVEL THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD,
19:15:09 LOOKING FOR A PLACE TO PARK, HAVING TO UNITED STATES THE
19:15:11 LOCAL ROADS.
19:15:12 SO WHEN THIS PROPERTY WENT UP FOR SALE, MY CLIENT DONCO
19:15:18 HOLDINGS PURCHASED IT IMMEDIATELY.
19:15:19 WE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS WITH THE CITY TO DETERMINE HOW
19:15:24 TO DEMOLISH THE HOME.
19:15:26 SINCE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD, WE DID HAVE SOME
19:15:30 CHANNELS TO GO THROUGH THERE.
19:15:31 BUT OUR INTENT ALWAYS HAS BEEN TO DEVELOP THIS AS A PARKING
19:15:35 LOT IF POSSIBLE.
19:15:37 AND WE DID RECEIVE THE PERMITS.
19:15:43 SO WE ARE HERE BEFORE YOU TODAY TO SEE WHAT WE THINK IS A
19:15:49 GOOD THING.
19:15:52 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, I AM GOING TO CALL IT THE
19:15:55 FUNCTIONAL FRONT.
19:15:56 WE HAVE TWO FRONTS, THE FRONT AND THE BACK.
19:15:58 THE PARKING SPACES INCREASE VERY MINOR, LIKE A VERY MINOR
19:16:03 AMOUNT, AND THAT REQUIRES BE 15-FOOT BUFFER.
19:16:05 AND I THINK THE TOTAL IS 32 SQUARE FEET.
19:16:09 WE COULD FIT IN THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK AND REQUIRED
19:16:13 LANDSCAPING.
19:16:13 SO OUR ONLY WAIVER ON THE FRONT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS THAT
19:16:17 PARKING SETBACK FROM 15 TO 10.
19:16:21 I'LL CALL IT THE REAR FRONT ADJACENT TO FRIERSON.
19:16:25 WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A PROBLEM.
19:16:30 ROUGHLY 50% OF THE PARKING ENCROACHES INTO THAT REQUIRED
19:16:34 SETBACK.
19:16:37 ONE OF OUR CONCERNS IS MAYBE WE COULD MOVE THE PARKING, SO
19:16:43 THAT WE HAVE EQUAL REDUCTION FROM BOTH SIDES.
19:16:46 BUT IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BEST WAY TO DO THIS WOULD BE
19:16:50 TO ALLOW THAT VERY MINOR ENCROACHMENT OFF OF THE SHADOWLAWN
19:16:55 FRONT AND THE GREATER ENCROACHMENT OFF OF FRIERSON BECAUSE
19:16:58 OF THE CHARACTER OF FRIERSON AVENUE.
19:17:01 AS YOU CAN SEE BY LOOKING AT THIS -- THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO
19:17:09 WHAT STAFF HAS SHOWN YOU.
19:17:14 THE MORE INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES ARE TO THE NORTH.
19:17:18 AND THE COMMERCIAL REACH INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, FRIERSON, IS
19:17:24 DEEPER THAN ALL OTHER IMPACTS.
19:17:27 SO AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE COMMERCIAL USES.
19:17:33 ALL OF THE HOMES ON BOTH 9th AND 10th STREET ARE
19:17:36 ORIENTED TO THE WEST.
19:17:38 AND THE LOTS ON SHADOWLAWN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SHADOWLAWN
19:17:43 ARE THREE LOTS.
19:17:44 SO THEIR BACKYARDS BUTT UP TO FRIERSON.
19:17:49 SO FOR THESE REASONS, WE FEEL THAT THE SETBACK REDUCTION AND
19:17:55 ELIMINATION OF THE BUFFER IS BETTER ON THE FRIERSON FRONT
19:17:59 THAN ON THE SHADOWLAWN FRONT.
19:18:03 WE ARE HERE BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS EXPRESSED CONCERN
19:18:06 OVER PARKING, AND WE WANT TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR.
19:18:09 WE WANT TO PROVIDE THE MUCH NEEDED PARKING, AND THIS LOT WAS
19:18:13 PLATTED BACK IN 1923.
19:18:15 IT HAS THE WIDTH TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED 3-FOOT BUFFERS
19:18:19 ON THE EAST AND WEST.
19:18:20 WE ARE PROVIDING A VERY GENERAL USE 12-FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN
19:18:24 OUR COMMERCIAL USE AND THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USE.
19:18:28 BUT WE FEEL THAT THE NEED FOR PARKING OVERRIDES THE NEED FOR
19:18:32 THAT BUFFERING.
19:18:33 AND WE WOULD VERY MUCH APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT OF THESE MUCH
19:18:38 NEEDED PARKING SPACES FOR A TOTAL OF 20.
19:18:42 SO QUESTIONS?
19:18:44 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
19:18:46 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6?
19:18:48 PLEASE COMB FORWARD.
19:18:49 >> I WILL READ FROM A PREPARED STATEMENT.
19:19:06 MY NAME IS JOSEPH COSTA, A RESIDENT ON SHADOWLAWN AVENUE,
19:19:11 ALSO A FREQUENT PATRON, BOTH SIT IN AND TAKEOUT, AT ELLIS
19:19:17 BECAUSE THE FOOD IS PHENOMENAL.
19:19:19 AND THE ATMOSPHERE IS VERY FRIENDLY.
19:19:22 I ALSO MEET WITH GROUPS THAT WORKS THERE ON A REGULAR WEEKLY
19:19:28 BASIS.
19:19:28 I DO NOT HARBOR ANY PERSONAL ILL WILL TO THE OWNER OF ELLIS
19:19:36 WHOM I ALSO KNOW.
19:19:37 AND ONE ADDITIONAL REASON MY WIFE AND I ARE LOYAL PATRONS IS
19:19:41 CONVENIENCE.
19:19:42 BECAUSE LIVE WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF THE RESTAURANT, AND
19:19:45 IN FACT WE ARE ONE HOUSE REMOVED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
19:19:50 SHADOWLAWN AVENUE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THIS HEARING.
19:19:55 THE ISSUES I AND A GOOD NUMBER OF MY NEIGHBORS HAVE, AND
19:19:59 SUBJECT TO THE RESTAURANT PATRONS, ARE RATHER FRUSTRATING.
19:20:04 INITIALLY PARKING ON BOTH SIDE OF SHADOWLAWN AVENUE,
19:20:07 TYPICALLY STARTING CLOSER TO THE RESTAURANT, AND THEN
19:20:10 FURTHER DOWN THE STREET CREATING SITUATIONS THAT WERE SO
19:20:14 TITAN EMERGENCY VEHICLE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PASS.
19:20:18 AS SECOND COUNT IN A MEDICAL EMERGENCY OR IN THE CASE OF A
19:20:21 HOUSE FIRE, THE SITUATION WAS MORE THAN A LITTLE WORRISOME,
19:20:25 PARTICULARLY WITH MY OWN HEALTH ISSUES.
19:20:28 BUT TO MRS. DEMMY'S CREDIT, A VALET PERSON AND SIGNAGE HAVE
19:20:37 ALLEVIATED THAT PARTICULAR PROBLEM.
19:20:39 STILL RESTAURANT PATRONS COMING DOWN SHADOWLAWN AVENUE AND
19:20:42 USING PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS AND LAWNS TO TURN AROUND ONCE THEY
19:20:46 PASS THE RESTAURANT PARKING LOT.
19:20:48 SO MY PROPERTY IS FREQUENTLY VIOLATED BY THESE DRIVERS.
19:20:52 WITH TWO YORKIES IN OUR FAMILY, THE BARKING IS FREQUENT
19:20:56 DURING THE RESTAURANT'S OPENING HOURS.
19:20:58 AT NIGHT WE HAVE THE ADDED INTRUSION OF HEADLIGHTS IN OUR
19:21:01 LIVING ROOM.
19:21:02 AND THIS IS AN EXPERIENCE THAT MANY OF OUR RESIDENTS HAVE TO
19:21:07 DEAL WITH.
19:21:08 WE HAVE NEIGHBORS TAKING NUISANCE MEASURES BY SETTING UP
19:21:11 BARRIERS SUCH AS ORANGE CONES, YELLOW TAPE STRUNG FROM
19:21:16 PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE, BIG POTTED PLANTS ON WHEELS
19:21:19 THAT CAN BE MOVED AND POSITIONED WHEN NEEDED.
19:21:21 THESE ARE NUISANCE MEASURES THAT IMPACT THE QUALITY OF LIFE
19:21:26 IN WHAT IS OTHERWISE A REALLY COOL NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:21:29 ANOTHER ISSUE IS WHEN RESTAURANT PATRONS TURN ONTO
19:21:33 SHADOWLAWN AVENUE.
19:21:35 OFF OF NEBRASKA.
19:21:35 [BELL SOUNDS]
19:21:37 AND IMMEDIATELY STOP ON THE CORNER TO DROP OFF PASSENGERS.
19:21:40 THIS IS A DANGEROUS SCENARIO BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN THIS HAPPEN
19:21:42 WHEN THE CAR TURNING ONTO SHADOWLAWN IS FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER
19:21:45 CAR, THE CAR FOLLOWING DOES NOT AN ANTICIPATE CAR IN FRONT
19:21:49 STOPPING TO DROP OFF PASSENGERS, SO IT'S BLOCKING OFF
19:21:51 NEBRASKA AVENUE AND AT RISK OF BEING BROADSIDED.
19:21:55 THE DROP-OFF AND PICKUP SCENARIO ALSO CAUSE IN FRONT OF THE
19:21:58 RESTAURANT ON NEBRASKA AVENUE, AND BOTH OF THESE SITUATIONS
19:22:01 ARE --
19:22:03 [BELL SOUNDS]
19:22:04 POTENTIAL DISASTER.
19:22:07 I REQUEST SOME ADDITIONAL TIME.
19:22:08 I HAVE A FEW MORE THINGS.
19:22:10 >>FRANK REDDICK: HOW MUCH MORE?
19:22:12 >> ANOTHER MINUTE.
19:22:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: GIVE YOU 30 SECOND.
19:22:16 >> THANK YOU.
19:22:16 MY INITIAL CONCERN OF THE PARKING, IT'S A RESIDENTIAL LOT,
19:22:27 HOW DOES IT AFFECT MY PROPERTY VALUE?
19:22:29 AND I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THE DESIRE OF ELLIS HAVING ITS
19:22:33 PARKING LOT.
19:22:35 BUT I'M ALSO QUESTIONING WHETHER THIS PARKING LOT IS GOING
19:22:40 TO ALLOW ELIMINATING PARKING AT OTHER BUSINESSES THAT ARE
19:22:43 AROUND THERE.
19:22:44 AND I'M SURE THERE'S A COST TO ELLIS FOR THAT PARKING.
19:22:49 BUT ALL THE PARKING LOTS ARE FILLED WHEN THE RESTAURANT IS
19:22:52 OPEN.
19:22:54 IF THEY ARE ELIMINATED THE PARKING SITUATION IS NOT GOING TO
19:22:57 BE IN ANY WAY ALLEVIATED.
19:22:59 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:23:01 THANK YOU, SIR.
19:23:01 >> OKAY.
19:23:02 >>FRANK REDDICK: NEXT SPEAKER.
19:23:06 >> OH, SORRY.
19:23:09 >> SUSAN LONG, 921 EAST BROAD STREET.
19:23:15 I DO NOT LIVE IN THAT IMMEDIATE AREA.
19:23:18 I HAVE CARS IN MY DRIVEWAY AND FRONT YARD AND WHEREVER THEY
19:23:21 GO.
19:23:21 HOWEVER, I FREQUENT ELLIS.
19:23:23 WHEN I GO DOWN THERE, REAL EARLY, THERE AREN'T ENOUGH
19:23:30 PARKING SPACES FOR THAT.
19:23:33 NOW, YOU CAN PARK A FEW SPOTS, AFTER 7 YOU CAN PARK IN THEIR
19:23:38 LOT EXCEPT WHEN THEY ARE OPEN LATER AND YOU CAN'T, AND
19:23:41 ACROSS NEBRASKA, YOU CAN PARK A LITTLE BIT -- IT'S CRAZY.
19:23:50 TO SPEND THEIR MONEY TO ALLEVIATE THIS ISSUE, I THINK IT'S
19:23:54 WONDERFUL.
19:23:54 FRIERSON IS NOT WHAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER, WELL, PART OF
19:23:59 FRIERSON IS NOT REAL RESIDENTIAL.
19:24:01 IT'S MAINLY BACKYARDS, DRIVE THROUGH FROM COMMERCIAL.
19:24:04 SO COME IN SHADOWLAWN, AND THEN TURN LEFT, PARK, AND THEN
19:24:11 WHEN YOU LEAVE GO ON OUT, TURN LEFT AND BACK ON NEBRASKA,
19:24:14 WHICH IS WHAT PEOPLE WIND UP DOING.
19:24:16 I THINK IT WILL SOLVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS.
19:24:20 I IS IT GOING TO SOLVE THE PARKING ISSUES?
19:24:23 CERTAINLY NOT.
19:24:24 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEEDS ABOUT 12 PARKING LOTS TO SOLVE THEIR
19:24:26 ISSUES.
19:24:27 THAT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN.
19:24:28 BUT THIS WILL CERTAINLY ALLEVIATE AND I THINK IT'S WONDERFUL
19:24:31 IF THEY WERE WILLING TO SPEND THEIR MONEY AND THEIR TIME TO
19:24:34 HELP ALLEVIATE THE PARKING ISSUES.
19:24:36 NOT EVERY BUSINESS WOULD DO THAT.
19:24:37 SO I RECOMMEND THAT YOU APPROVE IT.
19:24:40 THANK YOU.
19:24:40 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER
19:24:43 6?
19:24:44 >>YVONNE CAPIN: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:24:46 >>FRANK REDDICK: PETITIONER.
19:24:48 YOUR TIME NOW.
19:24:49 >>YVONNE CAPIN: SORRY.
19:24:50 >> I JUST WANTED-TO MAKE A FEW COMMENTS AND I WILL MAKE IT
19:24:55 QUICK.
19:24:56 THE IMPETUS OF THIS REQUEST IS TO ALLEVIATE THE PARKING
19:24:59 CONCERNS.
19:24:59 IF WE HAVE MORE PARKING, AND WE BROUGHT THE PARKING IN FROM
19:25:03 SHADOWLAWN AND OUT -- EXCUSE ME, LEFT OUT, ONTO FRIERSON,
19:25:09 ONE WAY OUT, THEN WE ARE ALLEVIATING SOME OF THE PARKING
19:25:12 CONCERNS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:25:13 WE ARE DOING OUR BEST TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR.
19:25:15 AND WITH THAT, I'LL CONCLUDE.
19:25:18 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
19:25:20 QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
19:25:21 >>HARRY COHEN: WHAT YOU WERE PRETTY CLEAR ABOUT ASKING FOR
19:25:24 THE 20 AND NOT 18.
19:25:25 >> CORRECT.
19:25:26 >>HARRY COHEN: SO I GUESS I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MS. FEELEY
19:25:31 THEN.
19:25:33 IS THAT EVEN WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF CITY COUNCIL THEN?
19:25:36 I MEAN, IS IT UP OR DOWN?
19:25:38 OR --
19:25:39 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT.
19:25:40 I GAVE YOU A REVISION SHEET THAT HAS THE MODIFICATION THAT
19:25:45 STAFF REQUESTED.
19:25:46 IT ALSO HAS TWO MODIFICATIONS THAT THE APPLICANT REQUESTED
19:25:50 BE ADDED DOWN AT THE BOTTOM.
19:25:52 IF IT'S YOUR PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE 20, THEN WE WILL MODIFY
19:25:58 THE WAIVER, WE'LL MODIFY THE REVISION SHEET TO REMOVE URBAN
19:26:03 DESIGN'S MODIFICATION IN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:26:06 THAT WOULD BE PART OF YOUR MOTION.
19:26:08 AND THEN ALSO THE FOURTH BULLET UNDERSTOOD LAND DEVELOPMENT.
19:26:15 ALTHOUGH I THINK THEY MAY BE ABLE TO GET TO A 6-FOOT
19:26:19 SIDEWALK.
19:26:20 THEY CAN GET THE 6-FOOT SIDEWALK.
19:26:22 IT'S JUST GOING TO BE PARTIALLY ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.
19:26:25 SO I THINK EVEN WITH THE 20 SPACES, WE STILL HAVE ROOM TO DO
19:26:29 THE SIX FEET.
19:26:30 >> YES.
19:26:33 AND PART OF THE SIDEWALK WILL BE IN THE PRIVATE PROPERTY,
19:26:36 AND ANOTHER PORTION WILL BE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND
19:26:41 WE'LL GO THROUGH THE PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO DO THE SIDEWALK
19:26:43 EASEMENT.
19:26:44 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:26:48 >> MOTION TO CLOSE.
19:26:50 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:26:51 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
19:26:52 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
19:26:54 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
19:26:56 OPPOSED?
19:26:58 MR. SUAREZ?
19:26:59 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I PRESENT AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING
19:27:01 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
19:27:03 VICINITY OF 906 EAST SHADOWLAWN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
19:27:07 FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
19:27:09 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
19:27:14 SINGLE-FAMILY TO SH-PD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
19:27:19 PRINCIPLE PARKING, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND
19:27:21 INCLUDING PARTIALS OF THE REVISION SHEET THAT WOULD ALLOW
19:27:26 FOR 20 PARKING SPACES, AND TO DO ANY OTHER REVISIONS AS
19:27:33 REPORTED BY STAFF OF.
19:27:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M SORRY, I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THE
19:27:36 CITY PUT FORTH -- [OFF MICROPHONE] ONLY TWO PARKING SPACES,
19:27:48 10% OF THE TOTAL IS 20.
19:27:50 SO THAT AREA NEEDS A LOT OF PARKING, AND IN THE CITY OF
19:27:53 TAMPA.
19:27:54 THE THING I HEAR THE MOST IS TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND PARKING.
19:28:01 AND THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT I HEAR IN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS BUT
19:28:05 FROM EVERYWHERE ELSE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA THAT WE HAVE TO
19:28:08 START ADDRESSING.
19:28:09 THANK YOU.
19:28:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:28:14 WE HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. SUAREZ.
19:28:15 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
19:28:17 DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
19:28:18 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:28:20 OPPOSED?
19:28:20 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:28:25 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE 23 AUGUST AT 9:30 A.M.
19:28:29 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:28:31 ITEM NUMBER 8.
19:28:42 ITEM NUMBER 8.
19:28:52 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:28:57 ITEM NUMBER 8 ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS REZ 18-57.
19:29:02 LOCATED AT 3224 WEST OAKELLAR AVENUE.
19:29:07 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TAINT IS FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
19:29:09 SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL
19:29:13 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
19:29:14 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
19:29:19 THESE ARE ACTUALLY FOR THE REESTABLISHMENT OF TWO 50 BY 90
19:29:23 LOTS WHICH ARE 10 FEET SHORT OF THE RS-50.
19:29:27 SO THERE IS NO -- AS THEY MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE
19:29:34 ZONING.
19:29:34 THEY ARE JUST IN SINGLE OWNERSHIP NOW AND THEREFORE COULD
19:29:36 NOT BE DEVELOPED AS TWO PLATTED LOTS.
19:29:38 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:29:45 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:29:47 WE ARE DOWN N IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS
19:29:51 NEXT CASE.
19:29:52 MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:29:58 THE SUBJECT SITE, THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY TO
19:30:02 THE SUBJECT SITE IS HIMES AVENUE SPORTS COMPLEX LOCATED
19:30:07 APPROXIMATELY 1,600 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT
19:30:10 SITE.
19:30:10 THERE IS NO TRANSIT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THIS SUBJECT SITE.
19:30:14 AND THE IS A SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION
19:30:18 ZONE.
19:30:20 ONTO THE AERIAL.
19:30:21 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE.
19:30:23 THIS IS WEST OAKELLAR AVENUE, WEST HIMES AVENUE TO THE WEST.
19:30:33 AS YOU CAN SEE THE WHOLE AREA BASICALLY IS SINGLE-FAMILY
19:30:36 DETACHED IN CHARACTER.
19:30:39 YOU SEE AT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE AERIAL, THERE IS SOME
19:30:44 COMMERCIAL IN TOWNHOMES. THIS IS GANDY BOULEVARD DOWN HERE.
19:30:51 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:30:54 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES FOR BLOCKS AROUND IT
19:30:59 ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 CONTROLLING CATEGORY.
19:31:02 YOU SEE DOWN ON WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, YOU HAVE SOME
19:31:05 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, WHICH
19:31:10 IS THE PINK COLOR THERE.
19:31:14 THAT'S THE HIMES AVENUE SPORTS COMPLEX IN THE RECREATION
19:31:17 OPEN SPACE.
19:31:18 TO THE WEST.
19:31:21 THE MAJORITY OF THIS PORTION OF WEST OAKELLAR AVENUE IS
19:31:25 DEVELOPED WITH BE 50-FOOT WIDE LOTS.
19:31:27 THE EXISTING DENSITY FOR PARCELS FRONTING THIS BLOCK OF WEST
19:31:30 OAKELLAR IS 7.6 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:31:36 PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM OF TWO
19:31:38 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND OVERALL DENSITY
19:31:42 OF 9.5 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:31:44 PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS WOULD BE
19:31:47 OF A SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING
19:31:51 RESIDENTIAL USES AND WOULD NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OF
19:31:54 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PARTIAL OF THE BAYSHORE
19:31:56 BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:31:58 THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH DEVELOPMENT
19:32:01 PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
19:32:05 CATEGORY.
19:32:06 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
19:32:08 FINDS THE PROPOSAL FOR REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA
19:32:13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:32:14 THANK YOU.
19:32:14 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AGAIN.
19:32:21 THIS IS A REQUEST FROM RS-50 TO PD FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY
19:32:25 DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
19:32:27 AS I MENTIONED, THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS TWO PLATTED LOTS THAT
19:32:31 WERE PLATTED AT A 50 BY 90 IN THE OAKELLAR SUBDIVISION.
19:32:38 THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IN THE RS-50 IS A 5 THAT YOU SQUARE
19:32:40 FOOT LOT.
19:32:41 THEREFORE, THEY HAVE 500 FEET SHORT AS INDIVIDUAL LOTS.
19:32:46 THEY ARE CURRENTLY IN SINGLE OWNERSHIP.
19:32:48 WHEN YOU ARE IN SINGLE COMBINED OWNERSHIP, YOU CAN'T GO BACK
19:32:52 TO THE PLATTED LOTS.
19:32:53 IT THE 50 BY 90 HAD BEEN A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT COULD
19:32:57 STAY, OR BE REDEVELOPED AS A 50 BY 90 LOT.
19:33:04 PROPERTY IS LOCATED THREE BLOCKS NORTH OF GANDY IN BETWEEN
19:33:07 SOUTH HIMES AVENUE AND SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE, AND THE
19:33:10 PROPOSED PD SETBACKS, THE LOT 14, ARE A 20-FOOT FRONT WITH A
19:33:16 12-FOOT ALLOWED FOR A PORCH.
19:33:18 THE WEST SIDE IS 6-FOOT.
19:33:20 THE EAST SIDE IS 7-FOOT.
19:33:22 AND THE REAR IS 20.
19:33:24 ON LOT 13, THE EAST LOT, THE SETBACKS ARE, AGAIN, A 20-FOOT
19:33:29 FRONT WITH A 12-FOOT FOR A PORCH.
19:33:32 THE RS-50 ALLOWS YOU TO GO 8 FEET INTO THE FRONT YARD
19:33:35 SETBACK FOR A PORCH.
19:33:37 SO WE PUT THAT ON THE PD THAT WAY SO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE
19:33:39 THE SAME ALLOWANCE THAT CURRENT CODE GIVES THEM.
19:33:43 AND THEN WEST SIDE 5, EAST SIDE 9, REAR 20 FEET.
19:33:49 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 35 FEET AND THE
19:33:52 PROPERTY SURROUNDING AS DAVID MENTIONED BY ALL RS-50 ZONING,
19:33:56 WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS ON ALL SIDES.
19:34:02 THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN HERE IN GREEN.
19:34:06 OAKELLAR TO THE NORTH.
19:34:10 BAY LAY TO THE SOUTH.
19:34:15 HERE IS THE AERIAL.
19:34:17 [OFF MICROPHONE] THERE ARE SEVERAL TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
19:34:20 AND SOME OF THOSE SIDE YARD ADJUSTMENTS ARE FOR THE
19:34:24 ACCOMMODATION AND PRESERVATION OF TREES.
19:34:29 HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:34:33 THIS IS TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:34:36 HEADED TOWARD BAILEY.
19:34:40 AND THEN TO THE EAST.
19:34:55 THEN ACROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST SIDE OF OAKELLAR,
19:34:58 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES.
19:35:10 PRIOR TO LAND DEVELOPMENT I DO NEED THEM TO MAKE THE
19:35:12 SETBACKS IN THE SITE DATA AS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN
19:35:15 CONSISTENT, SPECIFICALLY ON THE WEST SETBACK LOT 14.
19:35:18 THE PLAN SHOWS 7.
19:35:19 TABLE REQUESTS 6.
19:35:21 ON THE EAST SETBACK OF LOT 13 THE PLAN SHOWS 9 AND THE TABLE
19:35:25 REQUESTS 7.
19:35:28 AND NATURAL RESOURCES, THEY NEED A NOTE STATING PRIOR TO
19:35:33 APPROVAL OF THIS, CITY COUNCIL FIND THE INSTALLATION OF
19:35:36 SIDEWALKS ALONG OAKELLAR TO BE IMPRACTICAL.
19:35:39 AS YOU KNOW, IN 202103 IT TALKS ABOUT THE PROVISION OF
19:35:44 SIDEWALKS.
19:35:45 FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, IN RELATION TO -- IN LIEU,
19:35:52 YOU JUST DON'T GET THE RIGHT TO PAY FEE IN LIEU.
19:35:55 COUNCIL HAS TO MAKE FINDING OF IMPRACTICALITY.
19:36:01 WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT NOTE ADDED AND THAT IS USE THIS
19:36:10 LOVELY TREE AND THE ROOT SYSTEM THAT ACCOMPANIES IT IN THE
19:36:13 FRONT OF THE LOT.
19:36:15 SECOND IS THAT AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING, THEY JUST WANT TO
19:36:19 NOTE THAT NO TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN TEN FEET OF POWER
19:36:22 LINES AND ALSO AT PERMITTING 25% OF THE LOTS -- [RUSTLING
19:36:26 PAPERS]
19:36:29 THEY ALSO STATED THAT THE APPLICANT SHOULD PROBABLY GO AHEAD
19:36:31 AND REQUEST A CRC WHICH IS A TREE EVALUATION CONSULT AND GET
19:36:35 THAT STARTED AT THIS TIME.
19:36:38 WITH THAT BEING SAID, AS I MENTIONED TO YOU, THIS IS RS-50.
19:36:43 I DID NOT DO THE 50-FOOT RED BLUE MAP BECAUSE EVERYTHING IN
19:36:48 THE AREA WAS PLATTED AT 50.
19:36:50 THEY JUST DON'T HAVE THE 100 FEET IN DEPTH.
19:36:53 STAFF DID FIND THIS REQUEST CONSISTENT.
19:36:55 WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:36:56 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
19:37:00 PETITIONER?
19:37:00 >>ABBYE FEELEY: SORRY, MR. MICHELINI.
19:37:12 I DID NOT DO A REVISION SHEET SINCE THERE ARE ONLY TWO
19:37:15 MODIFICATIONS.
19:37:16 ONE IS THE CORRECTION OF THE SETBACKS AND THE SECOND IS THE
19:37:19 NOTATION FOR THE SIDEWALK.
19:37:20 SO IF IT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION,
19:37:23 IF YOU WOULD GO AHEAD AND JUST IN YOUR MOTION INCLUDE THOSE
19:37:26 TWO MODIFICATIONS AS I JUST INDICATED.
19:37:29 THAT WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE USUAL YOU.
19:37:32 THANK YOU.
19:37:33 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
19:37:34 >>STEVE MICHELINI: AS ABBYE POINTED OUT, THIS IS AN UNUSUAL
19:37:46 SUBDIVISION, AND LOTS CONFORM WITH THE 50 DESIGNATION.
19:37:51 THEY ARE 90 FEET IN DEPTH INSTEAD OF 100 FEET WHICH WE
19:37:54 NORMALLY BE REQUIRED.
19:37:57 MY ISSUES REALLY RELATE TO THE EAST LOT.
19:38:02 AND I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED -- OUTSIDE OF THE WEST LOT, AND I
19:38:07 HAVE HIGHLIGHTED FOR YOU THE TREES THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY,
19:38:12 AND AS A RESULT OF THOSE TREES, WE ARE SHIFTING THE BUILDING
19:38:15 FOOTPRINT IS 9 FEET.
19:38:17 WE ARE SHIFTING IT AT A LARGER SETBACK ON THE WEST SIDE, AND
19:38:22 ON THE 5-FOOT SETBACK ON THE INTERIOR SETBACKS.
19:38:27 TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE TREES.
19:38:29 AND THEN IN TALKING TO NATURAL RESOURCES, THEY WANT PERVIOUS
19:38:32 CONCRETE OUT HERE TO PROTECT THE ROOTS OF THOSE TREES.
19:38:38 AND THE 35-INCH OAK AND 31-INCH OAK THAT WE SHIFTED THIS
19:38:42 STRUCTURE AND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT SLIGHTLY TO THE EAST SO
19:38:46 THAT WE CAN ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN.
19:38:50 THERE IS ALSO A LITTLE PATIO BALCONY IN THE FRONT, A PORCH.
19:38:56 OTHER THAN THAT THE BUILDINGS ARE MEETING THE 20-FOOT
19:38:59 SETBACK THAT YOU NORMALLY WOULD HAVE FOR THE FRONT, 50, AND
19:39:03 20 FEET OF THE SETBACK IN THE REAR.
19:39:08 WE ARE AGREEING WITH THE TWO REQUESTS OF THE CITY TO PUT THE
19:39:13 NOTES IN THERE REGARDING A SIDEWALK AS BEING IMPRACTICAL, AS
19:39:17 THEY WOULD DRAMATICALLY AFFECT THE OAK TREE THAT ABBYE
19:39:22 SHOWED YOU THE PICTURE OF THAT VERY LARGE LIVE OAK THAT'S
19:39:25 EXISTING THERE.
19:39:26 WE WILL BE HAPPY TO MAKE THE ADJUSTMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN AS
19:39:30 NEEDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:39:32 I'M CERTAINLY AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
19:39:34 BUT AS I SAID, THESE ARE EXISTING PLATTED LOTS.
19:39:39 BUT THEY WERE PLATTED AND THEY ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
19:39:41 ZONING CODE.
19:39:42 SO WE HAVE NO ABILITY TO PROVIDE RELIEF EXCEPT TO REZONE
19:39:46 THESE TO A PD.
19:39:48 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
19:39:50 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
19:39:52 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 8?
19:39:55 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:39:58 >>YVONNE CAPIN: SECOND.
19:39:59 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
19:40:00 SECOND BY MS. CAPIN.
19:40:01 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:40:03 OPPOSED?
19:40:04 MR. COHEN.
19:40:06 WILL YOU READ NUMBER 8?
19:40:07 >>HARRY COHEN: I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
19:40:10 FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
19:40:12 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3224 WEST OAKELLAR AVENUE IN THE
19:40:17 CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
19:40:19 SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50
19:40:23 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
19:40:26 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
19:40:28 DATE.
19:40:29 >> SECOND.
19:40:31 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. COHEN.
19:40:33 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
19:40:34 ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION?
19:40:36 OPPOSED?
19:40:38 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:40:40 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON 23 AUGUST AT 9:30
19:40:43 A.M.
19:40:44 >>FRANK REDDICK: ITEM NUMBER 9.
19:40:46 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:40:49 ITEM NUMBER 9 IS REZ 18-58.
19:40:51 IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY AT 5351 BRIDGE
19:40:57 STREET FROM PDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE AND IG AND
19:41:04 ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
19:41:07 DWELLING.
19:41:12 HUH HEY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:41:14 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:41:17 THIS NEXT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING
19:41:22 DISTRICT.
19:41:23 IT IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
19:41:27 IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
19:41:31 THERE IS TRANSIT WITHIN THE AREA OF GANDY WHICH IS A TRANSIT
19:41:35 EMPHASIS CORRIDOR, AND THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL
19:41:38 FACILITY IS GANDY PARK SOUTH WHICH IS LOCATED .5 MILES TO
19:41:43 THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:41:49 WE HAVE AN AERIAL. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:41:53 BRIDGE STREET GOING NORTH-SOUTH.
19:41:57 IT'S TYSON AVENUE AND WESTSHORE BOULEVARD EAST OF THE
19:42:02 SUBJECT SITE.
19:42:03 YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A WHOLE MIXTURE OF USES.
19:42:06 THE WESTSHORE MARINA DISTRICT WILL HAVE A MIXTURE OF
19:42:10 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, MULTIFAMILY, AND IF THERE'S SOME
19:42:15 REMAINING INDUSTRIAL USES OUT ON TYSON, THE WESTSHORE YACHT
19:42:19 CLUB HAS SOME MULTIFAMILY HOMES, AND THEN OFF OF WESTSHORE
19:42:27 MOVING EASTWARD, IT GOES DOWN TO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED,
19:42:32 WITH SOME TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT SCATTERED.
19:42:35 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:42:38 THE SUBJECT SITE, TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BASICALLY
19:42:44 FROM HERE OVER, IT'S URBAN MIXED USE 60.
19:42:47 THIS SMALL PORTION IN THE SOUTH IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
19:42:52 SIMILAR TO THE OTHER PARCELS TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST.
19:42:56 IT DROPS OFF AGAIN ON THE EAST SIDE OF WESTSHORE BOULEVARD
19:43:00 DOWN TO THAT RESIDENTIAL 10, FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
19:43:06 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE TO THAT PD.
19:43:09 THE PD WILL RECOGNIZE AN ADDITIONAL PARCEL IN THE
19:43:13 DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF A FUTURE LAND USE MAP
19:43:17 AMENDMENT, TACPA 17-14.
19:43:24 IT AMENDED A PARCEL FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PA COMMUNITY
19:43:27 MIXED USE 35 THAT YOU SEE ON THE MAP.
19:43:30 BASED ON THE DETERMINATION LETTER DATED JUNE 18, 2018, WHICH
19:43:36 IS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS
19:43:39 DETERMINED THAT THE RATTLE IN ANY CASE POINT POLICIES THAT
19:43:42 ARE WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DO NOT APPLY TO THIS
19:43:46 REZONING REQUEST.
19:43:48 THE DETAILS ARE IN THAT LETTER.
19:43:50 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO ENCOURAGE HOUSING AT HIGHER
19:43:55 DENSITY AND SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE
19:43:58 AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE TAMPA'S
19:44:01 PROJECTED POPULATION AND ABSORB THE REGIONAL GROWTH THAT ALL
19:44:09 THE JURISDICTIONS ARE EXPERIENCING.
19:44:11 PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL SUPPORT THESE POLICIES AND
19:44:13 OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY INCREASING HOUSING
19:44:16 WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
19:44:18 THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES A COMMON AREA
19:44:22 AND WALKWAY ALONG THE RATTLESNAKE CHANNEL, FURTHERING THE
19:44:26 OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT
19:44:29 PROMOTE PUBLIC SPACE ALONG WATERSIDE DEVELOPMENT.
19:44:33 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
19:44:35 FIND THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
19:44:38 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:44:40 THANK YOU.
19:44:40 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I THINK IT'S THE WRONG ITEM ON THE SCREEN.
19:44:50 >>FRANK REDDICK: NUMBER 9.
19:44:56 THERE YOU GO.
19:44:59 ALL RIGHT.
19:44:59 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:45:08 AS DAVID STATED, TYSON AVENUE IN THE WESTSHORE MARINA
19:45:12 PROJECT.
19:45:13 YOU CAN SEE, THE ENTIRE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT WAS ORIGINALLY
19:45:17 REZONED IN 05, WAS AMENDED IN 05 AND THEN AMENDED AGAIN IN
19:45:21 07.
19:45:21 THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
19:45:24 BASICALLY, WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO ACHIEVE, THIS IS AN
19:45:30 EXISTING LARGE PHASE OF THE MARINA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
19:45:34 THEY RECENTLY ACQUIRED THIS STRIP OF PROPERTY WHICH IS
19:45:37 APPROXIMATELY AN ACRE, AND IS CURRENTLY ZONED IG.
19:45:40 THEY WANT TO SPREAD IT OVER WHICH IN EFFECT WOULD BE THIS
19:45:48 LAND DEVELOPMENT.
19:45:48 SO THEY ARE JUST KIND OF EXPANDING THE EXISTING ENTITLEMENT.
19:45:54 HOWEVER, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD THAT WITHIN THE WESTSHORE
19:45:58 MARINA DISTRICT.
19:46:01 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
19:46:03 CURRENTLY VACANT.
19:46:04 IT'S TO THE EAST.
19:46:05 AND THESE ARE APARTMENTS FOR WESTSHORE MARINA FOR
19:46:09 REDEVELOPMENT.
19:46:14 THIS IS TO THE WEST.
19:46:17 DOWN TYSON AVENUE.
19:46:18 ACROSS FROM THE PROPERTY IS THE TOWER.
19:46:23 ANOTHER PHASE OF THE WESTSHORE YACHT CLUB CONDOS.
19:46:26 AND THEN LASTLY CATTY-CORNER, IS THE TAMPA HARBOR BUILDING.
19:46:41 CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, ONE PRIMARILY
19:46:45 DIFFERENT FROM THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.
19:46:49 ORIGINALLY, THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE THREE BUILDINGS WITH
19:46:51 THREE TOWN HOMES EACH.
19:46:57 THROUGH DISCUSSION WITH STAFF THEY ARE REVISING IT AND IT IS
19:47:00 REFLECTED IN THE REVISION SHEET, THAT TWO BUILDINGS WITH
19:47:06 FOUR.
19:47:10 THE CHANGES TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:47:13 ALL THE CHANGES THAT WE MADE AND INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS FROM
19:47:17 TRANSPORTATION, THAT IS NEEDED ON THE SITE PLAN.
19:47:27 CERTIFY ACCESS, AS WELL AS A VERBAL AMENDMENT TO THE
19:47:30 REVISION SHEET.
19:47:31 BUT THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE
19:47:36 UNITS FROM 7 TO 9.
19:47:40 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS PD
19:47:42 APPLICATION.
19:47:43 AGAIN, IT'S MULTIFAMILY DWELLING AS WELL AS SINGLE-FAMILY
19:47:46 ATTACHED.
19:47:48 MINOR CHANGES LIKE I JUST STATED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
19:47:51 READING WITH TRANSPORTATION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
19:47:52 COORDINATION.
19:47:54 SO OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT, STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT
19:47:58 WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:47:59 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS.
19:48:02 WITH THE REVISION SHEET INCLUDED IN THE AMENDMENT.
19:48:07 THE CHANGES REFLECT TEN UNITS.
19:48:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE BOAT DOCKS, IS THAT IN COORDINATION
19:48:17 WITH THE PORT AUTHORITY?
19:48:18 THE BOAT DOCKS.
19:48:20 >> YES, SIR.
19:48:21 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IS THAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY OR OTHER
19:48:25 PUBLIC AGENCIES THAT GET INVOLVED?
19:48:26 >> I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE ARMY CORP AND I BELIEVE THE PORT
19:48:31 AUTHORITY HAS THE AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT ARMY CORP.
19:48:35 THE CITY -- THEY CAN SPEAK IN MORE DETAIL BEFORE B WHAT'S
19:48:41 GOING ON WITH THEM.
19:48:42 ANYTHING ELSE?
19:48:43 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
19:48:46 APPLICANT?
19:48:46 >> 401 EAST JACKSON STREET.
19:49:00 STAFF DID A REALLY GOOD JOB SO I WON'T TAKE UP TOO MUCH OF
19:49:03 YOUR TIME TONIGHT.
19:49:04 WHAT WE ARE REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH HERE IS AGAIN,
19:49:07 WESTSHORE MARINA DISTRICT ON THE WATER AND A MIXED USE
19:49:14 PROJECT.
19:49:14 WHAT THIS APPLICATION REALLY DOES IS IT INCORPORATES ONE
19:49:19 ACRE THAT'S REALLY UNUSABLE TO ANYONE AT THIS POINT.
19:49:22 WE CAME BEFORE YOU LATE LAST YEAR TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND
19:49:28 USE.
19:49:33 THIS IS HOW THE DISTRICT IS ENVISIONED TO BE ONCE IT'S
19:49:36 COMPLETED.
19:49:36 MOST OF THE PARCELS HAVE BROKEN GROUND OR VERY CLOSE.
19:49:43 THE ONE ACRE HISTORICALLY WAS A PART OF THE OPERATION AND
19:49:51 WORKED WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF TO THEN DETERMINE THAT
19:49:58 THIS ONE ACHIER IS ON RATTLESNAKE POINT, AND WHAT WE ARE
19:50:05 DOING IS BRINGING THIS HISTORICAL ACRE THAT REALLY CAN'T BE
19:50:09 USED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES ANYMORE INTO THE DISTRICT, SO
19:50:11 THAT IT CAN BE USEFUL AGAIN.
19:50:15 AND COUNCILMAN, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, WE DID THE
19:50:21 ACCESSORY USE OF THE DOCKS, BUT THE WE HAVE TO PERMIT THOSE.
19:50:29 SO WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DAVID SMITH FOR A COUPLE
19:50:32 OF TECHNICAL COMMENTS.
19:50:38 >>DAVID SMITH: 401 EAST JACKSON STREET, PLANNER WITH MILLER.
19:50:42 AGAIN STAFF DID VERY GOOD SUMMARY OF WHAT OUR REQUEST IS.
19:50:47 JUST WANT TO PUT A CLARIFICATION IF THE ELMO WORKS TO MAKE
19:50:51 IT CLEAR WHAT THE DIFFERENCES ARE TO BE CHANGED BETWEEN
19:50:55 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:50:57 ESSENTIALLY, WE HAVE A MODIFICATION.
19:51:02 THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION IS SHOWN TO BE THE TEN UNITS, SIX
19:51:07 AND FOUR.
19:51:07 WHAT YOU SEE IN YOUR SITE PLAN BEFORE YOU IS THE CURRENT
19:51:12 SUBMITTAL WHICH HAS 3, 3 AND 3.
19:51:14 BASICALLY ALL THE SETBACKS REMAIN THE SAME, THE EASEMENTS
19:51:17 REMAIN THE SAME.
19:51:18 IT'S JUST THE CONFIGURATION OF THE BUILDINGS HAVE SHIFTED
19:51:20 INTO TWO BUILDING BLOCKS INSTEAD OF THREE SEPARATE BUILDING
19:51:23 BLOCKS.
19:51:25 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS INDICATED BY DAVID
19:51:28 HEY, THE PROJECT AS INDICATED BY -- THIS PART OF THE LARGER
19:51:39 PROJECT THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
19:51:40 MULTIPLE FAMILY BUILDINGS, TOWNHOUSES, AND THIS IS JUST A
19:51:45 CONTINUATION OF THAT EFFORT.
19:51:46 OVERALL IT WILL BE ABOUT 106 UNITS DEVELOPMENT, AND IT WILL
19:51:50 BE CONTROLLED BY THE WESTSHORE MARINA GUIDELINES WHICH ARE
19:51:53 VERY STRICT ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND TREATMENT OF THE
19:51:57 FACILITY.
19:51:57 HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS BUT I FEEL IT'S A FAIRLY --
19:52:05 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
19:52:07 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9?
19:52:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:52:11 >> SECOND.
19:52:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: GOT A MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
19:52:14 SECOND BY MS. CAPIN.
19:52:16 ALL IN FAVOR?
19:52:17 OPPOSED?
19:52:18 ALL RIGHT.
19:52:21 MR. MANISCALCO, WOULD YOU READ NUMBER 9?
19:52:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
19:52:27 FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
19:52:29 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5351 BRIDGE STREET IN THE CITY OF
19:52:32 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
19:52:35 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD-A PLANNED
19:52:38 DEVELOPMENT, ALTERNATIVE, AND IG, INDUSTRIAL GENERAL, TO PD,
19:52:42 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, MULTIFAMILY DWELLING, AND ATTACHED
19:52:44 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING WITH ACCESSORY BOAT DOCKS, PROVIDING
19:52:47 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:52:47 >> SECOND.
19:52:48 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. MANISCALCO.
19:52:50 SECOND BY MS. CAPIN.
19:52:51 DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
19:52:53 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:52:54 OPPOSED?
19:52:54 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:52:59 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON 23 AUGUST AT 9:30
19:53:01 A.M.
19:53:02 >>FRANK REDDICK: OKAY.
19:53:04 WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 10.
19:53:16 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT.
19:53:18 REZ 18-73.
19:53:19 THIS IS THE EUCLIDEAN REQUEST LOCATED AT 5016 TO 5020 EAST
19:53:25 WASHINGTON STREET.
19:53:26 THE REQUEST IS FROM RM-24 TO CI.
19:53:29 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:53:35 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:53:36 WE ARE STILL IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THE
19:53:40 NEXT CASE.
19:53:42 CLOSE TO 50th STREET.
19:53:45 RIGHT AROUND THIS AREA.
19:53:49 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
19:53:52 IT IS IN AN EVACUATION ZONE A.
19:53:58 AND THERE IS TRANSIT ON 50th STREET.
19:54:02 HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:54:06 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:54:07 THIS IS 50th.
19:54:09 THIS IS WASHINGTON.
19:54:11 THIS BACKS UP TO THE LEE ROY SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
19:54:15 THIS IS THE GAS STATION.
19:54:19 AND MOST OF THE AREA ON WASHINGTON STREET IS VACANT.
19:54:26 THERE ARE SOME SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS AT THE END OF
19:54:29 THE STREET AND ALSO A RADIO TRANSMISSION FACILITY.
19:54:35 THERE.
19:54:37 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:54:43 THE SUBJECT SITE, AND ALL THIS KIND OF REDDISH COLOR, ARE
19:54:48 THE TRANSITIONAL USE 24.
19:54:50 THAT'S THAT CATEGORY THAT ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND
19:54:53 INDUSTRIAL, A LOT OF THESE AREAS WERE DEVELOPED PRIOR TO
19:55:00 ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING.
19:55:03 SO USUALLY THEY HAVE A MIXTURE.
19:55:06 YOU FIND A LOT OF THESE IN TAMPA.
19:55:08 TO THE NORTH, THIS IS REGIONAL MIXED USE 100.
19:55:11 AND YOU HAVE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
19:55:14 AND THEN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
19:55:21 BYPASS CANAL.
19:55:23 WE HAVE THE APPLICANT REQUESTING CI ZONING DISTRICT.
19:55:30 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED IF REQUEST, FOUND THAT THE
19:55:34 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA UNDER THAT
19:55:38 TRANSITIONAL USE 24, THAT THIS REZONING IS COMPARABLE AND
19:55:42 COMPATIBLE WITH THAT PATTERN THAT'S ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT
19:55:48 CONDITIONAL USE 24, AND BASED ON THAT, PLANNING COMMISSION
19:55:52 STAFF FINDS THE REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA
19:55:55 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:55:56 THANK YOU.
19:55:56 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:56:04 AGAIN, 5016, 5020 EAST WASHINGTON STREET.
19:56:07 THE REQUEST IS FROM RM-24 TO CI.
19:56:10 THE PROPERTY IS 1.2 ACRES AND IT IS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF
19:56:15 THE CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY AND EAST OF 50th STREET, ON THE
19:56:19 NORTH SIDE OF EAST WASHINGTON.
19:56:21 IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
19:56:22 THE PROPERTY, THE CLOSEST DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS THE METRO
19:56:28 GAS STATION AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 50th AND
19:56:31 WASHINGTON.
19:56:31 I'LL SHOW YOU THAT.
19:56:32 MINIMUM STANDARD FOR THE CI LOT IS 10,000 SQUARE FEET WITH A
19:56:37 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 100.
19:56:41 HERE IS THE PROPERTY SHOWN IN GREEN.
19:56:44 EVERYTHING IS SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY IS CI.
19:56:48 RM-24.
19:56:50 A COUPLE LOTS TO THE WEST ALONG 50th.
19:56:57 AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY.
19:57:03 HERE IS THE LOCATION OVER HERE.
19:57:11 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
19:57:13 LOOKING NORTH.
19:57:18 THIS IS THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST.
19:57:21 HERE IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF WASHINGTON.
19:57:24 ALSO, ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WASHINGTON TO THE EAST.
19:57:27 AND THEN BACK.
19:57:34 STAFF DID FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
19:57:38 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:57:39 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
19:57:40 ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
19:57:42 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK -- OH, PETITIONER, I'M
19:57:45 SORRY.
19:57:45 IS PETITIONER HERE?
19:57:46 >> TY APAYDIN.
19:57:55 I AM THE APPLICANT.
19:57:56 WE ARE TRYING TO GET A CI.
19:58:05 FOR CONSIDERATION WOULD BE APPRECIATED.
19:58:08 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:58:08 I APPRECIATE IT.
19:58:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
19:58:11 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER
19:58:15 10?
19:58:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:58:18 >>CHAIRMAN: MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
19:58:19 SECONDED BY MR. MANISCALCO.
19:58:20 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:58:22 OPPOSED?
19:58:23 ALL RIGHT.
19:58:24 MS. CAPIN.
19:58:25 >>YVONNE CAPIN: REZ 18-73.
19:58:30 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
19:58:32 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
19:58:37 5016, 5018, 5020 EAST WASHINGTON STREET IN THE CITY OF
19:58:44 TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
19:58:46 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
19:58:50 TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:58:53 >> SECOND.
19:58:54 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN CAPIN.
19:58:57 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
19:58:58 DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
19:58:59 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
19:59:01 OPPOSED?
19:59:01 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:59:05 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON BE 23 AUGUST AT 9:30
19:59:08 A.M.
19:59:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: ITEM NUMBER 11.
19:59:11 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT, REZ 18-20.
19:59:17 THIS IS LOCATED AT 2851 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
19:59:20 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS FROM PD RESIDENTIAL
19:59:23 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
19:59:27 ATTACHED.
19:59:29 JUST FOR A LITTLE BIT FRAME OF REFERENCE, THIS APPLICATION
19:59:32 WAS ACTUALLY APPROVED IN NOVEMBER OF 2016.
19:59:36 IT WAS RECENT, FOR 18 TOWNHOMES THAT WERE CONFIGURED WITHIN
19:59:41 FOUR BUILDINGS WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ALMOST 50 FEET.
19:59:45 9 WAS 49 FEET.
19:59:46 YOU MAY REMEMBER STAFF HAD SOME CONCERNS RELATED TO IT.
19:59:49 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, DIFFERENT APPLICANT, SAME
19:59:53 PRODUCT.
19:59:54 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TOWNHOMES.
19:59:56 DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION.
20:00:03 I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW IF IT LOOKED FAMILIAR IT
20:00:05 SHOULD BE.
20:00:06 IT WAS NOT THAT LONG AGO.
20:00:09 DOWN BY KOJAK'S.
20:00:10 AND THE BAYSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC.
20:00:13 HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY.
20:00:15 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:00:17 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:00:17 WE REMAIN IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT
20:00:20 CASE.
20:00:21 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON GANDY WHICH IS IDENTIFIED AS
20:00:25 A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
20:00:29 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED ON A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AS
20:00:35 DEFINED BY THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:00:38 EVEN THOUGH IT IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR CURRENTLY
20:00:42 THERE IS NO TRANSIT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:00:46 PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SERVING THE AREA INCLUDE
20:00:50 BALLAST POINT PARK AND THE GENERAL ABRAHAMS FITNESS AND
20:00:53 WELLNESS CENTER LOCATED TO THE SOUTHEAST.
20:00:58 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
20:01:05 ONTO THE AERIAL.
20:01:12 HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:01:14 GANDY.
20:01:14 AND THIS IS WHERE IT TURNS ONTO BAYSHORE.
20:01:17 ABBYE WAS SAYING KOJAK'S TO THE SOUTH, ALSO AN ANIMAL CLINIC
20:01:27 TO THE SOUTH AS WELL.
20:01:28 YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A MIXTURE OF SOME COMMERCIAL USES, AND
20:01:36 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
20:01:42 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:01:44 IT'S HARD TO SEE.
20:01:47 THERE IS TWO LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:01:50 THE VARIETY MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
20:01:55 THERE'S A SMALL SLIVER OF RESIDENTIAL 10 ON THE NORTHERN
20:01:59 PIECE.
20:02:00 THERE IS NO DEVELOPMENT ANTICIPATED IN THAT SMALL SLIVER OF
20:02:04 RESIDENCES.
20:02:08 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL AND FOUND
20:02:15 THAT THE PD ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION OF A
20:02:19 DIVERSITY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING TYPES.
20:02:22 THE APPLICANT PLANS TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
20:02:26 DWELLING UNITS WHICH FURTHERS ONE OF THE PLAN'S MAJOR
20:02:29 DEVELOPMENT POLICIES.
20:02:31 AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:02:33 STAFF FIND THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:02:36 PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:02:38 THANK YOU.
20:02:38 >>ABBYE FEELEY: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:02:49 THERE IS ONE WAIVER THAT'S BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS
20:02:52 APPLICATION.
20:02:54 IF YOU CAN SEE ON THE PLANS IN FRONT OF YOU, THESE UNIT ARE
20:02:58 COMPRISED IN THREE BUILDINGS.
20:02:59 ONE OF THE BUILDINGS IS ORIENTED TO GANDY FOR THE ENTRANCES
20:03:02 FACING GANDY, WHICH IS WHAT OUR CODE REALLY PROMOTES.
20:03:06 THEN THE WESTERN BUILDING AND THE NORTHERN BUILDING ARE
20:03:09 FACING AN INTERIOR COURT, DRIVEWAY COURT THAT DOES REQUIRE A
20:03:14 WAIVER BECAUSE THE CODE REQUESTS THAT ON SINGLE-FAMILY
20:03:17 ATTACHED THOSE ENTRANCES FACE EITHER A COURTYARD TYPE OF
20:03:22 SPHERE OR THEY FACE A RIGHT-OF-WAY.
20:03:24 SO THAT WAIVER IS FOR THE WESTERN BUILDING AND THE NORTHERN
20:03:26 BUILDING.
20:03:29 THIS IS A .87-ACRE PROPERTY.
20:03:32 YOU MAY REMEMBER FROM THE FIRST REZONING ON THIS, I BELIEVE
20:03:35 IT WAS A CONSERVATORY, THIS PROPERTY BELONGED TO THE NORTH
20:03:40 LOT, THIS PROPERTY WENT ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO HAWTHORNE,
20:03:43 AND THE NORTHERN LOT BECAME RS-60 LOTS AND HAVE BEEN
20:03:47 DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TYPE.
20:03:49 THE SOUTHERN PIECE, WHICH IS SHOWN HERE IN YELLOW, WAS
20:03:52 COMMERCIAL GENERAL PIECE THAT WENT TO PD FOR TOWNHOMES AND
20:03:55 IS NOW BACK BEFORE YOU DUE TO A RECONFIGURATION AND A
20:04:00 REDUCTION IN PERIMETER SETBACK WHICH CANNOT BE APPROVED BY
20:04:04 LAND DEVELOPMENT AFTER REZONING IS APPROVED BY YOU.
20:04:10 THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN HERE IN GREEN.
20:04:13 GANDY.
20:04:13 BAYSHORE.
20:04:14 YOU WILL SEE THAT RED JAG LINE THERE, THE RS-60 THAT
20:04:19 ENCOMPASSES NORTHBOUND AND THEN THE RS-60 TAKES GOES UP
20:04:26 BAYSHORE A LITTLE BIT.
20:04:33 THERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
20:04:37 THERE'S THE PROPERTY FROM GANDY.
20:04:46 I DID GO THROUGH THE PROPERTY.
20:04:48 THIS IS THE NORTHERN PORTION OF HAWTHORNE.
20:04:57 THERE IS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO THE EAST AS YOU APPROACH
20:05:01 BAYSHORE ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY.
20:05:03 IT USED TO BE RENTAL, FOR SALE CONDO RECENTLY. ACROSS
20:05:11 GANDY, TO THE SOUTH.
20:05:16 THE ANIMAL CLINIC.
20:05:18 KOJAK'S.
20:05:19 AND THEN LOOKING FROM THE ANIMAL CLINIC EAST TO BAYSHORE,
20:05:23 AND A LITTLE BIT FURTHER OUT OF THE SITE.
20:05:33 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
20:05:35 WHEN THE APPLICANT RESUBMITTED THIS AFTER THE DRC, I DON'T
20:05:38 THINK THEY HAD ALL THE LAYERS SO THERE WAS A LOT OF MISSING
20:05:42 INFORMATION.
20:05:43 I HAD A DISCUSSION WITH HIM AFTERWARD AND IT WAS THOSE
20:05:46 LAYERS WERE TURNED OFF NOT DISPLAYING THE INFORMATION ON THE
20:05:48 SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
20:05:50 SO ON PAGES 2 AND 3, THE INFORMATION THAT'S BEING REQUESTED
20:05:54 BY STAFF WOULD BE TO CORRECT THAT SO THAT THE RELEVANT
20:05:59 INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN SO THAT THESE PLANS
20:06:03 CANNOT ONLY BE FOR THE ZONING ENTITLEMENT BUT ALSO THEY CAN
20:06:08 SERVE AS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THIS TOWN HOME
20:06:11 DEVELOPMENT.
20:06:15 AND THAT LIKE I SAID WAS A WEEKS CORRECTION OF THE WAIVERS
20:06:18 FOR THE CODE SECTION, ILLUSTRATE THE TOWN HOME LINES, THE
20:06:22 COVERED STOOP AND UPPER BALCONIES AND LOT DIAGRAM, ADJUST
20:06:27 THE SETBACKS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BALCONIES, ILLUSTRATE THE
20:06:31 BALCONIES ON THE SITE LAYOUT, AND THEN JUST THEY ARE MISSING
20:06:36 BUILDING SETBACKS, DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, DUMPSTER
20:06:41 ENCLOSURES AND DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS THAT THERE IS A
20:06:46 TECHNICAL OCCURRENCE AND I DID CONFIRM THAT WITH THEIR
20:06:49 ENGINEER.
20:06:49 NATURAL RESOURCES HAS A COUPLE OF COMMENTS TO BE ADDED AS
20:06:55 WELL.
20:06:57 FOR THINGS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWING BUT ARE NOT
20:07:00 CURRENTLY SHOWING.
20:07:01 SO THEY NEED SOME ADJUSTMENTS MADE AND THOSE ADJUSTMENTS
20:07:06 HAVE BEEN ARTICULATED IN THE SITE PLAN AS WELL.
20:07:11 WITH THAT BEING SAID, THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WITH
20:07:13 GREATER DENSITY.
20:07:14 IT'S BEING REQUESTED FOR 15 TOWNHOMES THIS EVENING.
20:07:17 AND STAFF DID FIND THIS REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:07:20 MODIFICATIONS BEING MADE IN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:07:24 READING.
20:07:24 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:07:25 >>FRANK REDDICK: QUESTIONS, COUNCIL?
20:07:33 PETITIONER?
20:07:37 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED AS ABBYE
20:07:41 SAID IN 2016 FOR HIGHER DENSITY NUMBER OF TOWNHOUSES.
20:07:46 WE ARE RECONFIGURING THE SITE AND BRINGING IT BACK IN FOR A
20:07:49 REQUEST FOR FEWER TOWNHOUSES.
20:07:51 WE ARE ADJUSTING SETBACKS AND SHIFTING BUILDINGS TO
20:07:54 ACCOMMODATE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF SPECIMEN TREES,
20:07:59 SPECIFICALLY IT'S A 48-INCH OAK, THERE'S A 37-INCH OAK,
20:08:03 40-INCH OAK.
20:08:04 AS YOU SAW FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH, THERE'S A LOT OF UNDERSTORY
20:08:07 AND SMALLER TREES THAT WILL BE SHIFTING THE BUILDINGS AROUND
20:08:10 TO SAVE AS MANY AS POSSIBLE.
20:08:13 THIS IS PD TO PD.
20:08:16 AND WE ARE COMMITTING TO MAKING THE CHANGES AS REQUESTED BY
20:08:20 STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:08:22 AND ADD THE ADDITIONAL NOTES.
20:08:25 AS THE STAFF HAS INDICATED WE HAVE SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES
20:08:28 WITH OUR SITE PLAN.
20:08:29 FOR SOME REASON, THE LAYERS THAT SHOWED THE DIMENSIONS DID
20:08:32 NOT APPEAR ON THE FINAL SITE PLAN.
20:08:35 THE LOCATION IS CORRECT.
20:08:36 THE DIMENSIONS WERE OMITTED FOR SOME REASON.
20:08:39 SO WE WILL BE ADDING THOSE BACK IN.
20:08:41 THESE ARE PROPOSED TO BE 45 FEET IN HEIGHT AS THE ORIGINAL
20:08:45 PROJECT WAS AT 45 FEET OF HEIGHT.
20:08:48 IT'S SURROUNDED BY MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL.
20:08:51 AND GANDY BOULEVARD.
20:08:53 WE ARE REQUESTING THE ONE WAIVER WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE
20:08:56 BUILDING FRONT TO FRONT ON THE INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS INSTEAD OF
20:09:00 ON GANDY.
20:09:01 AND THAT ALLOWS US TO PLACE THE BUILDINGS AT RIGHT ANGLES TO
20:09:05 EACH OTHER INSTEAD OF TRYING TO LINE THEM UP ALL ALONG GANDY
20:09:08 BOULEVARD.
20:09:09 I THINK THAT WE HAVE -- AT LEAST WE HAVE BEEN VERY SENSE TO
20:09:15 THE SITE, MUCH MORE SO THAN THE PREVIOUS ZONING, AND WE ARE
20:09:19 REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL.
20:09:20 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU I HAVE.
20:09:23 ONE OF THE FINAL ISSUES IS LAYING OUT OF THE LOT LINE, AND
20:09:29 THE BALCONY LINES AND ALL THAT.
20:09:32 WE'LL INCUR AS WE ARE GOING THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS,
20:09:35 BUT WE WILL PUT THOSE ON THE NEXT PLAN THAT COMES BACK
20:09:38 BEFORE YOU IN THE EVENT THAT YOU APPROVE THIS ON FIRST
20:09:41 READING.
20:09:42 AND WE APOLOGIZE FOR THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES.
20:09:45 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
20:09:49 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 11?
20:09:53 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
20:09:54 >> SECOND.
20:09:55 >> MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
20:09:56 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
20:09:57 ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION?
20:09:59 OPPOSED?
20:10:02 MR. MIRANDA.
20:10:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FILE NUMBER 11, REZ 18-20.
20:10:08 MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
20:10:11 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
20:10:13 2851 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
20:10:17 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
20:10:19 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
20:10:23 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
20:10:25 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
20:10:28 DATE, WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THEY WORK DILIGENTLY WITH THE
20:10:34 STAFF ON PAGE 2 AND 3 AND ALSO WITH NATURAL RESOURCES.
20:10:39 >>YVONNE CAPIN: SECOND.
20:10:41 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:10:43 SECONDED BY MR. COHEN.
20:10:47 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:10:48 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
20:10:51 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON 23 AUGUST AT 9:30
20:10:53 A.M.
20:10:54 >>HARRY COHEN: AS I DID ON THE COMPANION PLAN AMENDMENT, I
20:11:00 AM RECUSING MASON VOTING FROM NUMBER 12 BECAUSE MY FATHER IS
20:11:03 ONE OF THE APPLICANTS, AND I HAVE FILED THE APPROPRIATE
20:11:07 PAPERWORK.
20:11:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 12.
20:11:12 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:11:16 ITEM NUMBER 12 IS REZ 18-52, FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY
20:11:20 LOCATED AT 608 NORTH WILLOW AVENUE AND 1332 WEST CASS STREET
20:11:27 FROM CG TO PD MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS AND RESTAURANT WITH
20:11:34 BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 27-140 OF THE LAND
20:11:37 DEVELOPMENT CODE INCREASE INTENSITY FROM 1.507 TO 2 F.A.R.
20:11:44 IN CMU 35.
20:11:46 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:11:49 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:11:52 WE ARE IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING -- TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
20:11:55 FOR THIS NEXT CASE.
20:11:57 SPECIFICALLY THE WEST TAMPA URBAN, AND ALSO THE HYDE PARK
20:12:05 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:12:06 THIS SUBJECT SITE MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU.
20:12:08 IT WAS RECENTLY IN FRONT OF YOU, TACPA-18301.
20:12:13 IT WAS AN AMENDMENT THAT TOOK THE SITE FROM THE GENERAL
20:12:17 MIXED USE 24 TO THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 THAT YOU SEE ON
20:12:22 THE MAP TODAY.
20:12:24 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS THE JULIAN B.
20:12:29 LANE PARK 2,100 FEET TO THE NORTH ALONG NORTH WILLOW AVENUE.
20:12:35 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC -- TRANSIT SERVICE IS 1,500 FEET TO THE
20:12:43 EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH BOULEVARD AND WEST CASS.
20:12:48 SERVED BY HART ROUTE 7.
20:12:50 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION
20:12:53 ZONE.
20:12:55 ONTO THE AERIAL.
20:12:57 THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE IN THE CENTER.
20:13:00 AND IT IS NORTH WILLOW.
20:13:03 WE HAVE CASS.
20:13:08 THIS SURROUNDING AREA HAS A WIDE MIXTURE OF USES FROM LIGHT
20:13:13 INDUSTRIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ESPECIALLY ON THE NORTH
20:13:20 SIDE OF CASS STREET.
20:13:22 AND THEN ALSO THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA, JULIAN B. LANE PARK
20:13:29 IS UP HERE.
20:13:31 ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:13:34 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE BASED ON THE PLAN AMENDMENT HAS
20:13:39 CHANGED TO THAT PINK COLOR WHICH IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
20:13:44 35.
20:13:45 THE PROPERTY SURROUNDING THE SITE REMAINS THAT GENERAL MIXED
20:13:49 USE 24.
20:13:51 YOU CAN SEE OTHER COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FURTHER TO THE
20:13:55 WEST, WEST OF OREGON AVENUE.
20:13:57 TO THE SOUTH, KENNEDY TO THE SOUTH, THIS IS URBAN MIXED USE
20:14:07 60.
20:14:08 AND THEN OFF TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL 35.
20:14:13 AND THEN GOES DOWN TO RESIDENTIAL 20.
20:14:21 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AGAIN WITHIN AN AREA OF THE
20:14:25 CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT WHICH HAS BEEN TRANSITIONING
20:14:28 FROM PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PATTERN TO A MORE MIXED
20:14:32 USE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:14:33 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN
20:14:37 VILLAGE WHICH ENCOURAGES A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
20:14:41 WHERE APPROPRIATE.
20:14:41 THE NUMBER OF SIMILAR TYPE DEVELOPMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED
20:14:43 AND DEVELOPED TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, MOSTLY
20:14:47 CENTERED ALONG NORTH ROME AVENUE.
20:14:49 THE MAJORITY OF THOSE DID NOT HAVE ANY COMMERCIAL USES IN
20:14:52 THEM.
20:14:53 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS
20:14:56 THE PROPOSAL AND BRINGS ADDITIONAL DENSITY AND INTENSITY
20:14:59 INTO AREAS CURRENTLY SERVED WITH TRANSIT, AND THAT ARE
20:15:02 LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO EMPLOYMENT CENTERS.
20:15:05 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROVIDES FOR A STRUCTURE WITH
20:15:09 ENTRYWAYS AND PEDESTRIAN LOBBY ORIENTED TO ADJACENT PUBLIC
20:15:13 RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WHICH ARE ENCOURAGED THROUGH COMPREHENSIVE
20:15:16 PLAN POLICY IT .2.6.
20:15:18 OVERALL THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE
20:15:21 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, ALSO PROMOTING THE
20:15:24 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S MIXED USE CORRIDORS IN A WAY
20:15:27 THAT PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT USAGE.
20:15:30 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:15:32 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED
20:15:37 USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:15:39 IT IS NO MIXED USE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:15:43 IN THAT CATEGORY, MIXED USE IS ENCOURAGED BUT IS NOT
20:15:46 REQUIRED.
20:15:48 WITHIN THOSE CATEGORIES.
20:15:50 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
20:15:53 FINDS THE REZONING REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
20:15:56 THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:15:59 THANK YOU.
20:15:59 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: HERE IS THE ZONING AREA.
20:16:20 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN GREEN IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL
20:16:23 GENERAL WITH CONSIDERATION OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
20:16:31 THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
20:16:34 CASS AND WILLOW.
20:16:36 AND CARMEN CORRIDORS.
20:16:39 AS WELL AS CI REZONED ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO TO THE WEST.
20:16:43 AND IT GOES ON, THE RS-50 RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE
20:16:47 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:16:49 NORTH AND SOUTH.
20:16:50 AND THEN GOES TO INDUSTRIAL TOWARDS THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
20:17:01 A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE AREA.
20:17:02 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM WILLOW.
20:17:05 AND AGAIN YOU WILL NOTICE THAT IT HAS WILLOW -- I AM GOING
20:17:14 TO GO TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THEN GO AROUND THE BLOCK.
20:17:20 THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
20:17:24 >>FRANK REDDICK: EXCUSE ME FOR A SECOND.
20:17:26 SOMEBODY MUST NOT KNOW HOW TO OPERATE THEIR PHONE.
20:17:32 PLEASE.
20:17:32 WE ASKED EARLIER THAT YOU PUT IT ON VIBRATE.
20:17:36 OR PUT IT ON SILENT.
20:17:38 ALL RIGHT?
20:17:38 LET'S GO.
20:17:39 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: HERE IS ANOTHER SAID OF THE PROPERTY.
20:17:45 AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY -- [OFF MICROPHONE]
20:17:55 TO THE WEST, ON CASS, CONSTRUCTION OFFICE.
20:18:02 ACROSS CASS GOING BACK TOWARD WILL O.
20:18:06 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES THAT HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO EITHER
20:18:08 OFFICES OR SMALL PERSONAL SERVICE USES.
20:18:12 AGAIN THE ZONING DISTRICT GOING SOUTH TOWARDS DOWNTOWN
20:18:16 TOWARDS WILLOW.
20:18:20 THIS IS AN OFFICE BUILDING CATTY-CORNER FROM THE SUBJECT
20:18:23 PROPERTY AT CASS AND WILL O.ACROSS THE STREET ON WILLOW.
20:18:30 ALSO HERE AGAIN, ACROSS WILLOW.
20:18:33 NOW WE ARE COMING TO CARMEN ACROSS THE STREET.
20:18:36 AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT CARMEN.
20:18:41 THE PARKING LOT FOR THAT BUILDING.
20:18:45 VACANT PROPERTY AT CARMEN AGAIN GOING AWAY FROM THE SUBJECT
20:18:48 PROPERTY.
20:18:49 AND THIS IS DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF CARMEN.
20:18:52 I DO WANT TO SHOW YOU A SERIES OF OTHER EXHIBITS.
20:18:58 JUST FOR YOUR REFERENCE.
20:19:00 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ON THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING IN
20:19:04 THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
20:19:05 AS YOU KNOW, THE PAST 10, 15 YEARS WE HAVE HAD A NUMBER OF
20:19:12 MULTIFAMILY, TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS.
20:19:14 ONE.
20:19:15 ISSUES THAT STAFF WOULD OF SEE IS REDUCED FRONT YARD SETH H
20:19:18 SETBACKS.
20:19:19 AS AN EXAMPLE HERE, THE PROJECT IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA WHERE
20:19:23 THERE IS VERY LIMITED -- YOU CAN SEE THE SCALE OF THE STEPS.
20:19:29 THIS IS A VERY LIMITED FRONT YARD SETBACK.
20:19:32 AS YOU CAN SEE THE TREES THAT ARE PLANTED THERE, THIS
20:19:34 BUILDING -- THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT WITH
20:19:40 VERY SMALL FRONT YARD SETBACK AND THE TREES ACTUALLY GROWING
20:19:45 INTO THE BUILDING.
20:19:46 THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
20:19:48 MANY THAT I SAW THE TREES GO INTO THE BALCONIES.
20:19:52 BECAUSE OF THAT, STAFF HAS REALLY TRIED TO STRONGLY
20:19:56 ENCOURAGE APPLICANTS TO HAVE AT LEAST A 10-FOOT SETBACK.
20:20:01 SIMILAR TO THIS PROJECT, RECENTLY DEVELOPED PROJECT, TO THE
20:20:07 APPLICATION SITE.
20:20:10 THIS IS A 10-FOOT SETBACK.
20:20:12 YOU CAN SEE IT ALLOWS A LOT MORE ROOM FOR TREE PLANTING.
20:20:15 TYPICALLY, TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED AT LEAST A 6-FOOT RADIUS
20:20:20 IF NOT A BE 10-FOOT RADIUS. SO AGAIN WITH A 10-FOOT
20:20:23 SETBACK, INCLUDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND
20:20:27 RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT WAS PROVIDED, FOR PLACEMENT OF NEWLY
20:20:30 INSTALLED TREES, THAT WOULD BE ABLE TO GROW OVER THEIR
20:20:33 LOUVRE TIME AND NOT HARM THE STRUCTURE THAT IS BUILT.
20:20:41 HERE IS THE SITE PLAN THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING.
20:20:45 AGAIN, IT'S A MULTIFAMILY PROJECT.
20:20:47 APPROXIMATELY 173 DWELLING UNITS.
20:20:51 THE OVERALL IS 1.93 ACRES.
20:20:59 WILLOW AND CARMEN.
20:21:00 THEY ARE PROPOSING A SMALL RESTAURANT.
20:21:05 THE SETBACKS -- AS A RESULT OF THE STRUCTURED GARAGE.
20:21:12 I KNOW THE APPLICANT WILL GO OVER THE DETAILS OF THE SITE
20:21:15 PLAN.
20:21:17 BUT THIS IS THE PORTION OF THE PROJECT AND THIS IS ALL THE
20:21:23 ASSOCIATED PARKING GARAGE FOR THE PROJECT.
20:21:28 AND THE OPEN AREA, OPEN TO THE SKY, WITH A LANDSCAPED AREA
20:21:36 AND VARIOUS AMENITIES.
20:21:38 THIS IS THE ELEVATION.
20:21:47 TYPICALLY ALONG THE WESTERN ELEVATION IS GOING TO BE ALONG
20:21:52 WILLOW.
20:21:54 I'M SORRY, THE EASTERN ELEVATION IS ALONG WILLOW.
20:21:56 HERE.
20:21:57 AND IT'S GOING TO BE FOUR STORIES.
20:22:01 DOWN TO THE SOUTH, AND THE NORTH, THE MIDDLE PORTION GOES UP
20:22:08 TO SIX STORIES.
20:22:09 AND THEN THE GARAGE DOWN TO FOUR.
20:22:13 SO THIS WILL BE FOUR STORIES.
20:22:15 THESE TWO SECTIONS, AGAIN THIS IS OPEN TO THE SKY.
20:22:17 THESE TWO SECTIONS WILL BE SIX STORY AND THEN THE REMAINDER
20:22:22 PARKING GARAGE.
20:22:27 THE CODE SAYS IF YOU ARE A SIX STORY BUILDING OR TALLER FOR
20:22:31 RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES THAT THE REQUIREMENT IS PERVIOUS.
20:22:35 IF YOU ARE UNDEVELOPED AREA, WHICH MEANS THAT IT'S NOT
20:22:41 BUILDING OR PARKING IMPROVEMENT, THIS IS COMPLIANT WITH
20:22:46 THAT.
20:22:48 [RUSTLING PAPERS] THEY ARE COMPLAINT WITH PARKING STANDARD.
20:22:51 AND THE ONLY WAIVERS THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING, WHICH IS TWO,
20:22:54 IS TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD LINE AGAIN FOR THE WEST TAMPA
20:22:58 OVERLAY FROM NORTH WILLOW STREET FROM 21 FEET TO 18 FEET 6
20:23:05 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE STREET, OR IT WOULD BE 8 FEET 6
20:23:09 INCHES FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE.
20:23:11 SO THEY ARE ASKING FOR ROUGHLY A 3-FOOT RELIEF FROM THAT
20:23:17 BUILD-TO LINE ON WILLOW.
20:23:19 THE OTHER WAIVER THEY ARE REQUESTING IS FROM THE
20:23:25 RIGHT-OF-WAY -- AGAIN IT'S 173 UNITS AND A SMALL RESTAURANT
20:23:32 CAFE COMPONENT.
20:23:33 YOU CAN SEE THE EDGE OF THE GARAGE, AS WELL AS THE EDGE OF
20:23:38 THE PROPERTY LINE, THREE AND A HALF FEET.
20:23:40 THEREFORE, TRUCKS BACKING IN WILL HAVE TO HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY
20:23:45 WHICH WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL BEFORE CONSTRUCT.
20:23:52 I WENT OVER THE SETBACKS WITH YOU.
20:23:55 THE MAXIMUM HATE ALLOWED WOULD BE 65 FEET.
20:23:58 BASED ON THE CURRENT NUMBER OF DWELL UNIT AS WELL AS THE
20:24:01 CAFE USE, 312 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, 312 ARE BEING
20:24:08 PROVIDED.
20:24:09 VEHICLE ACCESS WILL BE THROUGH THE GARAGE AND WILL BE OFF
20:24:13 CASS STREET ONLY.
20:24:14 THE PROPERTY AS DAVID SAID IS IN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
20:24:18 LAND CATEGORY, WHICH ALLOWS A DENSITY OF F.A.R. OR FLORIDA
20:24:24 AREA RATIO OF ONE.
20:24:25 GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SUBJECT LOT, THAT WOULD EQUATE TO
20:24:30 3,596 SQUARE FEET.
20:24:33 THE APPLICANT HAS ELECTED TO GO THROUGH A BONUS DENSITY
20:24:36 PROVISION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT'S BEFORE YOU
20:24:40 TONIGHT, NO DRAFT FORM.
20:24:43 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 2 WHICH WOULD BE FOR A TOTAL
20:24:46 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL OF 167,992.
20:24:51 THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT CAME IN INCREASED DENSITY
20:24:56 THAT WOULD BE FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE AREA BASED OFF THE
20:25:01 SECTION OF THE CODE IS APPROXIMATELY 920,000.
20:25:08 AGAIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS BEFORE YOU.
20:25:11 THERE ARE SMALL REVISIONS TO THE WAIVER TABLE, NOTE THAT
20:25:14 CLARIFY THE SIX STORIES IN HEIGHT.
20:25:17 TRANSPORTATION DID FIND IT INCONSISTENT BECAUSE OF THE
20:25:20 MANEUVERING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE LOADING DOCK.
20:25:23 NATURAL RESOURCES HAD SOME CLARIFICATION OF THE STREET TABLE
20:25:28 THAT THEY NEEDED, AS WELL AS URBAN DESIGN HAD ONE KIND OF
20:25:34 GENERAL COMMENT AS FAR AS, I BELIEVE, MR. KELLY MAY BE HERE
20:25:41 AND WANT TO SPEAK TO IT, THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH
20:25:43 ALL DESIGN STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF SURVEY.
20:25:48 BASED ON THAT, THE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DID FIND THIS
20:25:53 INCONSISTENT BUT BASICALLY JUST FOR THE TRANSPORTATION FOR
20:25:56 THE MANEUVERING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
20:25:58 ON THE THAN THE TWO WAIVERS THAT I SPOKE OF, THE MANEUVERING
20:26:02 IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LINE ON WOMEN OH, THE PLANNED
20:26:06 DEVELOPMENT HAS SUBMITTED WITH THE REVISION MEET ALL
20:26:10 REQUIRED REVISIONS.
20:26:13 [RUSTLING PAPERS] DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT THIS
20:26:15 TIME?
20:26:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
20:26:18 ALL RIGHT.
20:26:24 WE ARE DOWN TO FIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS.
20:26:35 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
20:26:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: COUNCIL, THE PETITIONER CAN ASK FOR A
20:26:41 CONTINUANCE IF THERE ARE FOUR MEMBERS, AND HAVE IT AS A
20:26:48 MATTER OF RIGHT.
20:26:50 WITH FIVE OR MORE MEMBERS, A REQUEST FROM THE PETITIONER,
20:26:57 BUT THE PETITIONER OBVIOUSLY DID NOT REQUEST IT.
20:27:01 COUNCIL CAN GO FORWARD.
20:27:03 IF IT IS REQUESTED BY THE PETITIONER THAT COUNCIL -- [OFF
20:27:07 MICROPHONE]
20:27:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: OKAY.
20:27:10 MR. GRANDOFF, WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE PETITIONER?
20:27:13 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: WE WILL PROCEED THIS EVENING,
20:27:23 MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:27:23 >>FRANK REDDICK: YOU ARE UP.
20:27:25 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: MY NAME IS JOHN GRANDOFF.
20:27:34 MY ADDRESS IS SUITE 3700 BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA.
20:27:38 THIS EVENING, I HAVE THE PLEASURE OF REPRESENTING ABC
20:27:42 CAPITAL ALONG WITH ANDREW COHEN WHO IS HERE TO MY RIGHT.
20:27:46 AND ALSO MR. ALEX COHEN WHO IS ALSO IN THE AUDIENCE.
20:27:49 PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.
20:27:55 THIS PROJECT IS A CLASSIC TRANSITIONAL USE.
20:27:58 IF YOU LOOK AT THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH THAT MR. HEY WAS
20:28:00 SHOWING TO YOU, THE DIVIDING LINE IS CASS STREET, TO THE
20:28:03 NORTH IS A MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
20:28:06 TO THE SOUTH IS INDUSTRIAL SECTION OF THIS PORTION OF THE
20:28:13 NORTH ROUGHER AREA, BETWEEN CASS AND KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
20:28:19 IN COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING YOU ALWAYS LOOK FOR TRANSITIONAL
20:28:21 USES.
20:28:22 IN A MULTIFAMILY PROJECT WITH A MIXED COMPONENT, THE CLASSIC
20:28:27 TRANSITIONAL USE.
20:28:29 SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, WE ACCOMPLISHED A PLAN AMENDMENT TO BRING
20:28:33 THIS PROJECT TO THE 35 DESIGNATION AND I HAVE THAT ORDINANCE
20:28:39 ADOPTED THAT I WILL FILE WITH YOU IN A MOMENT.
20:28:42 ALSO, IT IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN
20:28:45 THE WEST TAMPA CRA.
20:28:49 AND I HAVE INDICATED IN EFFECT CASS AND WILLOW THAT THIS
20:28:56 PURPLE STICKER THAT SHOWS EXACTLY THE LOCATION OF THE
20:29:00 PROPERTY, AND ITS PROXIMITY TO DOWNTOWN, AND ALSO THE WEST
20:29:07 RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:29:09 WE HAVE ALSO PREPARED AND NEGOTIATED A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
20:29:15 WITH THE CITY, WHICH HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY MR. COHEN.
20:29:21 THIS WILL ALLOW THE INCREASE IN THE F.A.R. 2.0 WITH THE
20:29:26 CORRESPONDING CONDITIONS REMITTED BONUS DENSITY PAYMENT TO
20:29:31 THE CITY, AND WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW IS SINCE THE PROJECT
20:29:35 IS IN THE CRA, AD VALOREM TAXES WILL BE DEVOTED TO THE CRA
20:29:41 FUNDING, AND ALSO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL REQUIRE AS
20:29:47 PART OF THIS PROJECT CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD INCLUDE
20:29:52 SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, BIKE LANES, CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
20:29:57 PROJECTS THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
20:29:59 AGREEMENT, STREETLIGHTING, THE UNDERGROUND LOCATION OF
20:30:06 UTILITY, THE ENCOURAGEMENT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE LEED
20:30:09 CERTIFIED, ON-STREET PARKING AND ON THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.
20:30:14 THIS IS WHAT I WOULD CALL A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OF
20:30:18 WHY YOU HAVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS EXECUTED BETWEEN THE
20:30:21 CITY AND WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA.
20:30:24 SO IN RETURN FOR THE INCREASED F.A.R., WHICH IS PERMITTED
20:30:27 UNDER THE CMU 35 PLANNED CATEGORY, THE CITY IS ABLE TO
20:30:32 ACHIEVE THESE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED BY
20:30:36 OUR CLIENT.
20:30:38 AS FAR AS THE STAFF REPORT, WE'LL EXPLAIN TO YOU THE WAIVERS
20:30:45 INVOLVED, AND PRIMARILY THE WAIVER ON WILLOW IS A REQUEST TO
20:30:54 REDUCE THAT AREA, AND I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW IT TO YOU.
20:30:58 THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:30:59 AND YOU WILL SEE -- CAN WE ADJUST THIS?
20:31:08 OKAY.
20:31:19 THERE WE GO.
20:31:20 SO THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THE BUILDINGS ALONG WILLOW AS
20:31:31 THEY ARE CURRENTLY CONSTRUCTED.
20:31:33 AND THIS IS AN URBAN AREA AND IT'S ENCOURAGING TO BRING THE
20:31:37 BUILDING TO THE FRONT.
20:31:38 YOU HAVE EXISTING BUILDINGS, AN EXISTING BUILDING ALREADY ON
20:31:41 WILLOW TO THE FRONT, ANOTHER BUILDING THERE.
20:31:47 ANOTHER BUILDING ALONG -- A BUILDING RIGHT ON THE LOT LINE.
20:31:54 AGAIN ANOTHER BUILDING.
20:31:56 AS WELL.
20:31:56 AND NOW, WHAT'S DEMONSTRATIVE IS THIS COULD BE AN INDICATION
20:32:04 OF THE WILLOW ENTRANCE TO THE PROJECT, VERY MUCH INCREASING
20:32:09 WITH THE CURRENT BUILDING STRUCTURES ON WILLOW AVENUE.
20:32:20 AND THIS IS THE CORNER OF WILLOW AND CASS.
20:32:29 WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS THAT MARY SHOWED TO
20:32:33 YOU A WHILE AGO.
20:32:48 PARDON ME FOR A MOMENT.
20:32:49 I PROVIDE TO MR. SHELBY THE ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PLAN
20:32:52 AMENDMENT.
20:33:03 ACCORDING TO THE STAFF REPORT, THE SECOND WAIVER THAT'S
20:33:05 INVOLVED IS THE TURNAROUND AREA ON CASS STREET FOR LOADING.
20:33:12 I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT THE CURRENT CODE IS A SUBURBAN CODE,
20:33:17 AND IT CONTEMPLATES A SUBURBAN AREA WITH LOTS OF ROOM.
20:33:24 HERE YOU HAVE AN URBAN SETTING AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME
20:33:27 ACCOMMODATION AND SOME WAIVER TO ACCOMPLISH THE TYPE OF
20:33:31 COMPACT, DENSE DEVELOPMENT CLOSE TO THE URBAN CORE AND TO
20:33:37 THE RIVER.
20:33:38 ON PAGE 6 AT THE BOTTOM, THE WAIVER CRITERIA IS RECITED, AND
20:33:47 I WILL SUBMIT TO YOU THAT THIS CRITERION HAS BEEN MET AND
20:33:50 THE WAIVERS JUSTIFIED.
20:33:50 WHAT'S IMPORTANT ABOUT THIS WAIVER, IT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER
20:33:54 TO ACCOMMODATE A GRAND TREE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE
20:33:58 PROJECT.
20:33:59 AND I AM GOING TO INTRODUCE MR. COHEN IN A FEW MOMENT AND
20:34:02 HE'S GOING TO EXPLAIN TO YOU THE ON-SITE NEGOTIATIONS THAT
20:34:06 HE ENGAGED IN WITH THE CITY FORESTRY STAFF TO ACCOMPLISH THE
20:34:11 ACCOMMODATION OF THIS TREE.
20:34:13 BUT IT DROVE THE REQUEST FOR THE WAIVER ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
20:34:17 ON CASS STREET FOR THE TRUCKS TO MANEUVER.
20:34:25 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
20:34:26 I WOULD LIKE TO GO DIRECTLY TO MR. HEYS REPORT, WHICH IS ON
20:34:35 PAGE -- IN YOUR BACKUP.
20:34:44 I THINK WHAT IS MOST TELLING OF HIS REPORT, A COUPLE ITEMS.
20:34:48 PAGE 3, LAND USE, 3.5.2.
20:34:53 ENCOURAGES THE CREATION OF A MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
20:34:56 ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER, IN WEST
20:34:59 TAMPA, REPOSITIONED WITH ENHANCED -- CONNECTED STREET,
20:35:04 COMMUNITY SERVICES.
20:35:07 POLICY 6.1.3 SUPPORTS PROPOSALS TO CONVERT NONRESIDENTIAL
20:35:12 PROPERTIES ALONG MIXED USE CORRIDORS BETWEEN MAJOR
20:35:16 INTERSECTIONS TO RESIDENTIAL OR MIXED USE RESIDENCE USES AND
20:35:20 MAKE SURE THE DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING
20:35:23 LAND USES AND HAS ADEQUATE ACCESS TO TRANSIT SERVICES AND
20:35:26 COMMUNITY SERVICES.
20:35:27 MR. HEY'S REPORT SUMMARIZES ON PAGE 5, OVERALL THE PROPOSED
20:35:32 DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE FOR SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
20:35:35 PATTERNS, OR REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S MIXED USE CORRIDORS
20:35:40 IN A WAY THAT PROMOTES PEDESTRIANS AND TRANSIT USES.
20:35:45 I RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THAT THIS APPLICATION MEETS THE
20:35:48 REQUIREMENT FOR THE WAIVERS UNDERSTOOD CHAPTER 27, AND
20:35:53 FURTHERMORE MEETS THE CRITERIA ENUNCIATED IN THE CMU 35
20:35:59 PLANNED CATEGORY.
20:36:00 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.
20:36:04 HE'S GOING TO COME FORWARD TO YOU AND EXPLAIN TO YOU THE
20:36:06 DYNAMICS OF THE WAIVER ALONG CASS STREET FOR THE
20:36:09 MANEUVERING.
20:36:10 >> EDWARD COHEN, ABC CAPITAL.
20:36:22 CHAIRMAN REDDICK.
20:36:24 MEMBERS.
20:36:24 CITY COUNCIL.
20:36:26 FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF A PROJECT LOCATED ON NORTH WILLOW,
20:36:30 WHICH IS JUST NORTH OF KENNEDY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CASS
20:36:34 STREET.
20:36:35 IN 1976, MY FATHER BOUGHT AN OLD WAREHOUSE ON GRAY STREET.
20:36:40 WHICH OUR OFFICES ARE NOW LOCATED AT.
20:36:44 WHICH IS ONE STREET OVER JUST SOUTH OF THE PROJECT.
20:36:47 WE REMODELED AND REPURPOSED THE WAREHOUSE IN THE 90s.
20:36:53 AND NOW A MARKETING COMPANY, A PRINTER, MEDICAL SUPPLY
20:36:59 DISTRIBUTOR, TWO GYMS, A KARATE CENTER AND AFTER-SCHOOL
20:37:02 CARE.
20:37:03 WE HAVE ALSO BUILT AND OWN A THREE-STORY BRICK OFFICE
20:37:06 BUILDING ON THE CORNER OF WILLOW AND CARMEN DIRECTLY ACROSS
20:37:10 THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
20:37:13 WE BELIEVE THIS DEMONSTRATES THAT ABC CAPITAL IS A LONG-TERM
20:37:19 STAKEHOLDER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:37:21 WE ARE ENGAGED BE AND VESTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S VIBRANCY
20:37:25 AND SAFETY, AND THE DIRECTION WHERE IT'S HEADED IN THE
20:37:29 FOUGHT.
20:37:30 WHEN WE FIRST STARTED OUR RESEARCH ON THIS WILLOW AND CASS
20:37:34 PROJECT, TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE USE OF WHAT WAS NEEDED
20:37:38 IN THE DISTRICT, AND WHAT WOULD BE SUCCESSFUL, WE KNEW THAT
20:37:42 APARTMENTS ARE GOOD, AND MORE APARTMENTS ARE ON THE WAY.
20:37:45 WE HEARD, HOWEVER, OVER AND OVER AGAIN, ONE COMPLAINT THAT
20:37:49 KEEPS YOUNG PROFESSIONALS FROM WANTING TO MOVE TO THE WEST
20:37:52 TAMPA NORTH HYDE PARK DISTRICT, IS THAT THERE WERE TOO MANY
20:37:57 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA STUDENTS IN THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS, AND
20:38:00 IN THE HOUSES, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH.
20:38:06 SENIORS HAVE IN A PLACE TO GOVERNMENT WITH YOUR SUPPORT
20:38:09 TONIGHT, NOW THEY DO.
20:38:12 ABC CAPITAL IS PROUD TO PRESENT TO YOU TONIGHT FOR YOUR
20:38:16 APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST PRIVATE STUDENT
20:38:18 RESIDENCE WITHIN A FEW-MINUTE WALK, OR TWO-MINUTE BIKE RIDE
20:38:23 TO CAMPUS.
20:38:24 BASED ON THE FEEDBACK WE RECEIVED FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD,
20:38:27 PROVIDING AN OFF-CAMPUS RESIDENTS FOR SENIORS, WILL HELP
20:38:32 WITH THE PARKING COMPLAINTS, AND LOUD PARTIES IN THE
20:38:36 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:38:37 THIS WILL HELP GET THE STUDENTS AND THEIR CARS AND THEIR
20:38:41 PARTIES INTO THEIR OWN OFF-CAMPUS RESIDENCE AND OUT OF THE
20:38:46 APARTMENTS AND HOUSES.
20:38:49 UT HAS 9,000 STUDENT BUT ONLY CAN HOUSE 4400 IN THEIR DORMS.
20:38:55 WE ARE PROPOSING THE RESIDENTS WITH STATE-OF-THE-ART
20:38:59 FEATURES AND SECURITIES ESPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR STUDENT
20:39:02 SAFETY CONCERNS.
20:39:03 AND STUDY ROOMS, COLLABORATIVE TEAM ROOMS, POOL AND RETAIL
20:39:09 ON WILLOW.
20:39:12 WE ARE IN DISCUSSIONS WITH INDIGO COFFEE AND THEY HAVE A NEW
20:39:17 DONUT SHOP.
20:39:22 AND IS ON BOARD TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DISTRICT, WILL WORK WITH
20:39:25 TRANSPORTATION TO HAVE RETAIL-ONLY PARKING.
20:39:31 WE BELIEVE THIS IS A SPECIAL PROJECT THAT WILL HELP SPUR
20:39:34 ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON WILLOW AND CASS, TO FILL THE
20:39:37 SHORTAGE FOR QUALITY, SAFE, WALKABLE HOUSING AND RETAIL
20:39:42 SOLUTIONS.
20:39:43 THE PROJECT HAS GONE THROUGH MANY REVISIONS BEFORE COMING TO
20:39:48 YOU FOR APPROVAL.
20:39:51 WE HAVE MET WITH THE WEST RIVER COMMUNITY CRIME WATCH
20:39:57 ASSOCIATION FOUR TIMES AND WE HAVE LEARNED A LOT FROM OUR
20:39:59 MEETINGS WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF WEST RIVER, AND IN THE FOUR
20:40:03 MONTHLY MEETINGS WE ATTENDED AS WELL AS FURTHER DISCUSSIONS
20:40:06 WITH LEADERSHIP AFTERWARDS, WE LEARNED A VERY WELL INTENDED
20:40:11 PASSIONATE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY AND HAVE STRONG
20:40:14 CONNECTIONS TO PROTECT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:40:18 WE HAVE LEARNED FROM THE WEST RIVER FEEDBACK.
20:40:23 ONE BIG ISSUE THEY HAVE IS PARKING AND TRAFFIC.
20:40:28 AND THE OTHER WAS SETBACKS.
20:40:30 AFTER MEETING WITH THEM AND CONSULTATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
20:40:33 FROM CITY STAFF, WE REVISED OUR PLAN TO HAVE 10-FOOT
20:40:38 SETBACKS, AND TRANSLATE TO 8 FEET OF SETBACKS FROM THE
20:40:45 BUILDING TO THE STREET ON WILLOW, A 20-FOOT SETBACK FROM
20:40:51 CASS TO THE BUILDING AND 30-FOOT SETBACK FROM CARMEN STREET.
20:40:54 AS TO TRAFFIC, WE HAVE NO PARKING WAIVERS AND WE HAVE IN A
20:40:59 GREEN SPACE WAIVERS.
20:41:00 AND YOU HAVE SPOKEN TO MRS. JONES OF WEST RIVER LEADERSHIP
20:41:06 RECENTLY OVER THE LAST WEEK TO WORK IN COLLABORATION TO
20:41:11 SPEND A PORTION OF THE 900 -- IN THE WEST RIVER AREA FOR
20:41:20 SIDEWALKS AND LIGHTING, INDIRECTLY IN WEST RIVER.
20:41:26 THE WAIVER REQUESTED ON THE BACK SAVING A GRAND TREE ON THE
20:41:32 SITE, WHICH WE MANAGED TO SAVE, AND HAS BEEN A BIG PART IN
20:41:37 THIS WAIVER AND COLLABORATION WITH NATURAL RESOURCES.
20:41:41 WE SAVED AN ADDITIONAL GRAND TREE FOR A TOTAL OF THE TWO
20:41:44 GRAND TREES THAT WERE ON THE SITE.
20:41:47 CASS STREET ON BOTH SIDE OF THE STREET IS ALL COMMERCIAL.
20:41:51 ON BOTH SIDES.
20:41:54 AND ALSO MULTIFAMILY.
20:41:56 SOUTH OF CASS, WHERE OUR PROPERTY IS LOCATED, HISTORICALLY,
20:42:02 ARE NOW BEING REPURPOSED TO HIGH DENSITY.
20:42:06 AS THE SETBACKS, AS YOU CAN SEE, THAT I HAVE ALREADY SHOWED
20:42:10 YOU, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET, MOST OF THE SETBACKS ON
20:42:17 WILLOW ARE ACTUALLY ZERO, OR TWO OR THREE FEET.
20:42:22 WE ALSO MET WITH THE CRA CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND ALSO WITH
20:42:25 MEMBERS AND LEADERSHIP OF THE NORTH HYDE PARK ALLIANCE
20:42:29 SEVERAL TIMES, AND CONCERNS ALSO WELL INTENDED ARE
20:42:35 DIAMETRICALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE WEST RIVER COMMUNITY.
20:42:40 THE ALLIANCE WANT MORE.
20:42:41 THEY WANT MORE RETAIL, MORE DENSITY, THEY EVEN OFFERED TO
20:42:46 SUPPORT A HIGHER DENSITY THAN ALLOWED BY CODE.
20:42:48 [BELL SOUNDS]
20:42:57 I BELIEVE THAT WE STRUCK A BALANCE WITH THE MOST AMOUNT OF
20:43:01 RETAIL AND HAVE FOUND MIDDLE GROUND THAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR
20:43:04 THIS LOCATION.
20:43:06 >>FRANK REDDICK: YOUR TIME IS UP.
20:43:09 >> MAY I HAVE ONE MORE MINUTE?
20:43:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: I WILL GIVE YOU LIKE THE OTHER ONE 30
20:43:18 SECOND TO WRAP IT UP.
20:43:19 >> IF THIS PROJECT IS SUCCESSFUL, WE'LL SEE MORE OF THE
20:43:23 SAME, OF THE EMPTY STORES AND THE EMPTY COMMERCIAL OFFICES
20:43:26 AND WAREHOUSES THAT LITERALLY SURROUND THIS BLOCK, A
20:43:30 LOCATION OF INTEREST FOR RETAIL RESTAURANT AND OFFICE.
20:43:33 THE RESULT OF MONTHS OF COLLABORATION OF NEIGHBORS, OF CIVIC
20:43:37 ASSOCIATION, TO BUILD A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT.
20:43:44 GRATEFUL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THIS EXCITING
20:43:46 PROJECT.
20:43:47 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
20:43:51 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 12?
20:43:55 PLEASE COME FORWARD.
20:44:00 ITEM NUMBER 12.
20:44:00 PLEASE COME FORWARD.
20:44:14 HOW MANY PEOPLE?
20:44:15 BECAUSE WE ARE STARTING TO GO THROUGH THIS TOO MUCH EVERY
20:44:17 TIME WE HAVE A MEETING DOWN HERE.
20:44:20 HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SPEAK WHO HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN
20:44:24 IN?
20:44:27 ALL RIGHT.
20:44:27 YOU STAND UP AND BE SWORN IN.
20:44:29 WE DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS EVERY MEETING.
20:44:31 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK)
20:44:38 >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
20:44:44 MY NAME IS BENJAMIN BUCKLEY, 902 NORTH ROME.
20:44:47 I'M ALSO WITH THE NORTH HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION AS A
20:44:51 REPRESENTATIVE ON THE CAC.
20:44:55 WE ASK THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS.
20:44:58 I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL REMEMBER BACK IN 1985 WE HAD THE
20:45:03 MAKE TAMPA GREAT AGAIN, OR -- YEAH, AMERICA'S NEXT GREAT
20:45:08 CITY, 1985, KIND OF LIKE THE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
20:45:13 BUT DID WE ABANDON THAT?
20:45:14 I HOPE NOT.
20:45:15 I THOUGHT IT WAS A PRETTY GOOD IDEA.
20:45:17 AND I THINK WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS DO GREAT THINGS.
20:45:21 IF WE WANT TO BE A GREAT CITY WE HAVE TO DO GREAT THINGS.
20:45:24 AND I DON'T THINK THIS IS A GREAT PROJECT.
20:45:27 I THINK IT'S MAYBE AT BEST A MEDIOCRE PROJECT.
20:45:31 I ASK THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS.
20:45:36 HERE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS TO CONSIDER.
20:45:38 YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:45:39 WE ALL WORKED HARD ON THIS.
20:45:42 I WENT THROUGH A LOT OF WORKSHOPS WITH THE VISION PROGRAM,
20:45:46 AND VISION PLAN AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, GIGANTIC
20:45:51 PLAN.
20:45:52 BUT HERE IS A POINT IN THE PLAN THAT I THINK WE NEED TO
20:45:55 CONSIDER.
20:45:58 WEST TAMPA IS CONSIDERED AN URBAN VILLAGE, OKAY?
20:46:01 AND IT HAS TO DO WITH ECONOMICS.
20:46:02 WE NEED TO BEEF UP THE ECONOMICS.
20:46:07 THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY, THE PROFESSIONAL PLANNERS, ASKED FOR
20:46:12 INPUT FROM THE CITIZENS ABOUT THE PLAN.
20:46:14 LET'S USE IT.
20:46:15 LET USE THE PLAN.
20:46:16 THE PLAN SAYS -- IN THE PLANS, ON PAGE 28, THE PLAN CAN
20:46:23 SERVE AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE NEW DEVELOPMENT, THAT IT ALSO
20:46:28 SAYS ENSURES THAT HILLSBOROUGH CONTINUES TO BE THE COMMUNITY
20:46:32 THAT ITS CITIZENS DESIRE IT TO BECOME.
20:46:36 THAT'S US.
20:46:37 SO WE ARE ASKING YOU TO USE THE PLAN.
20:46:39 AND THEN LET'S FOLLOW THE PLAN.
20:46:41 THESE COMPONENTS, THIS IS WHAT IT ALSO SAYS.
20:46:44 THESE COMPONENTS ARE THE BUILDING BLOCKS WHICH HELP DEFINE
20:46:48 THE PLACES WHERE WE LIVE, WORK AND PLAY.
20:46:50 NOW, THIS PROJECT IS PRIMARILY A LIVE PROJECT.
20:46:55 THERE'S NO WORK.
20:46:56 THERE'S NO PLAY.
20:46:57 THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF RETAIL.
20:46:58 I DON'T THINK IT'S ENOUGH.
20:46:59 I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE MORE.
20:47:01 THEN WE GO ON.
20:47:02 LET'S FOLLOW THE PLAN.
20:47:04 THE COHENS, REAL NICE PEOPLE, THEY CAME TO OUR GROUP AND
20:47:09 THEY ASKED US TO BACK THEIR PLAN.
20:47:10 THEY TOLD US ABOUT THEIR PLAN.
20:47:12 AND WE ASKED THEM TO DO CERTAIN THINGS.
20:47:14 WE HAVE A LIST.
20:47:15 SOME OF THE OTHER FOLKS HERE WILL TALK ABOUT THAT.
20:47:17 BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THE COHENS SAID IS WHEN WE MENTIONED
20:47:21 ABOUT MORE RETAIL OAT GROUND LEVEL -- BY THE WAY, WE HAD SO
20:47:25 MANY PROJECTS COMING IN, NONE OF THEM HAVE RETAIL ON THE
20:47:28 GROUND LEVEL.
20:47:28 IT ALL PEOPLE LIVING ON THE GROUND LEVEL.
20:47:31 I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYBODY WANTS TO LIVE ON A BUSY STREET.
20:47:34 BUT BACK TO THIS.
20:47:36 THE COHENS, THEIR BANKER WOULD NOT CONSIDER THE -- ANY
20:47:44 INCOME -- THERE ARE CONSIDER THE COMMERCIAL SPACE AS A
20:47:48 NEGATIVE.
20:47:48 OKAY.
20:47:49 [BELL SOUNDS]
20:47:49 ANYWAY, SO WHAT WE HAVE IS BANKER, FINANCIAL PLANNER,
20:47:56 ACCOUNTANT, LEADING THE HORSE.
20:48:00 THEY ARE LEADING THIS PLAN.
20:48:01 NOT THE ARCHITECT, THE DESIGNER, AND THE URBAN PLANNER.
20:48:07 THEY ARE NOT LEADING THE PLAN.
20:48:09 SO WE ASK THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS.
20:48:12 THERE'S A WHOLE LOT MORE AND YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM A
20:48:14 LOT.
20:48:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
20:48:16 NEXT SPEAKER.
20:48:16 >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. WE SENT A LETTER.
20:48:27 I AM SPEAKING TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE NORTH HYDE PARK CIVIC
20:48:31 AND NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH, AND ALSO ON THE BOARD FOR THE
20:48:35 ALLIANCE, REPRESENTATIVE ON THE WEST TAMPA CAC.
20:48:38 SO -- I LIKE TO BE INVOLVED.
20:48:42 WE SENT A LETTER BACK ON JULY 18 WITH SIX POINTS OF WHY WE
20:48:45 ARE NOT IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.
20:48:47 I WANT TO GO TO 5 AND 6 RIGHT NOW.
20:48:52 SINCE THAT LETTER, THAT WAS ONE OF OUR POINTS.
20:48:56 THERE WAS NO COMMUNICATION BEFOREHAND SO WE ARE APPRECIATIVE
20:48:59 OF COMING AND DISCUSSING IT.
20:49:01 AND ALSO, ONE OF THE POINTS WAS THE GREEN SPACE WAIVERS.
20:49:07 AND CAN I SHOW FROM HERE?
20:49:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: YES.
20:49:12 >> PERFECT.
20:49:13 THIS IS WHAT THE WEST TAMPA CRA IS DEVELOP.
20:49:21 WHERE YOU SEE THAT VOID, THAT'S NORTH HYDE PARK.
20:49:25 THERE IS NO PARK.
20:49:29 WE HAVE JULIAN B. LANE, AND IN THE HEART OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
20:49:32 THERE IS NO PARK.
20:49:32 SO THAT'S HOW WE GREENE BRING OUR GREEN SPACE ALIVE, WHEN WE
20:49:37 COME TO THESE MEETINGS, TO DEVELOP THE SAME THINGS, BUT NONE
20:49:40 OF THAT COMES TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:49:42 BUT NOW THEY HAVE RAISED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT SO WE DON'T HAVE
20:49:47 TO WORRY ABOUT THAT.
20:49:48 MOVING QUICKLY, I WANT TO GO TO 4.
20:49:53 YES, WE DO WANT MORE MIXED USE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:49:56 WE WANT SOME RETAIL.
20:49:57 WE WANT PLACES TO GO.
20:49:59 AND THIS SHOWS A VERY DIFFERENT PICTURE OF WHAT'S BEING
20:50:05 PRESENTED AND DEVELOPED IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:50:06 SO WE WOULD LIKE COUNCIL TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
20:50:10 THE RETAIL THEY ARE PROPOSING IS 400 SQUARE FEET.
20:50:13 WHEN WE TALKED TO MR. COHEN HE SAID FOUR DIFFERENT BAYS AT
20:50:17 10 FEET EACH.
20:50:18 YOU DO THE MATH.
20:50:19 10 FEET BACK.
20:50:21 THAT'S A VERY SMALL PLACE TO HAVE RETAIL.
20:50:27 IT LOOKS GOOD ON THE PICTURES.
20:50:29 AND WE ARE ADDING BARELY ANYTHING ON CASS STREET WHICH HAS
20:50:36 BEEN DESIGNATED AS AN EAST-WEST, WE WILL HAVE NOTHING ON IT,
20:50:42 AFTER WE URGED COUNCIL TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AS WELL,
20:50:45 WE SPENT A LOT OF MONEY ON JULIAN B LANE PARK, WILL SIGN A
20:50:49 LOT MORE ON THE VISION PLAN.
20:50:54 ONE THING TALKED ABOUT QUICKLY WAS THE SETBACKS.
20:50:57 THEY HAVE TAKEN CARE OF.
20:50:58 THAT THEY HAVE DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB WITH THE SETBACKS.
20:51:00 WE ARE HAPPY ABOUT OF THAT.
20:51:01 WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE ENOUGH AROUND THE CORNER
20:51:08 894 UNITS COME INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:51:10 VERY QUICK TO ABOUT 1700 CARS.
20:51:13 NOW WE ARE GOING TO ADD EVEN MORE CARS.
20:51:15 A LOT OF THESE STUDENTS HAVE OVERNIGHT GUESTS, OVERNIGHT
20:51:20 STUDY GROUPS.
20:51:21 SO THAT WOULD DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE IN THE
20:51:23 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:51:23 AND NOBODY USING THE PARKING GARAGES.
20:51:27 WE WANT SOME MORE --
20:51:30 [BELL SOUNDS]
20:51:32 >>FRANK REDDICK: WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE WEST TAMPA
20:51:38 CAC?
20:51:39 WHAT IS THEIR POSITION?
20:51:40 >> I CANNOT SPEAK FOR THE COMMITTEE.
20:51:43 >>FRANK REDDICK: HAVE YOU HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT?
20:51:44 >> WE HAD A DISCUSSION --
20:51:48 >>FRANK REDDICK: HAVE YOU HAD A DISCUSSION --
20:51:51 >> NO, SIR.
20:51:52 >>FRANK REDDICK: THAT'S WHAT I AM ASKING.
20:51:54 ALL RIGHT.
20:51:54 NEXT SPEAKER.
20:51:55 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
20:52:32 >>FRANK REDDICK: YOU CAN GO AHEAD.
20:52:33 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
20:52:36 >>FRANK REDDICK: WE'LL GET IT.
20:52:37 WE HAVE GOT A TIME HERE.
20:52:38 >> MY NAME IS TERRY McCRAY HERE WITH THE RIVERFRONT
20:52:46 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. TWO OR THREE
20:52:49 NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WERE INVOLVED IN CREATING OVERLAY ARE
20:52:51 HERE WHICH IS NORTH RIVERFRONT AND NORTH HYDE PARK.
20:52:55 WHAT HAPPENED ALMOST 17 YEARS AGO, THE CITY APPROACHED THE
20:52:59 CITIZENS TO MAKE AN OVERLAY.
20:53:01 THE CITY WANTED TO MAKE THE OVERLAY BUT THE NEIGHBORS SAID
20:53:03 WE WANT TO DO IT OURSELVES.
20:53:05 FOR TWO YEARS WE DID IT.
20:53:08 EVERYTHING.
20:53:08 WE MET EVERY YEAR, EVERY DAY, EVERY WEEK FOR TWO YEARS.
20:53:13 ONCE THE OVERLAY WAS COMPLETED, YOU CAN LOOK AT THE
20:53:17 "ST. PETE TIMES" ARTICLE.
20:53:18 CITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
20:53:21 DISTRICT.
20:53:24 STEPS AT IMPROVING THE --
20:53:28 IF YOU LOOK AT SOME OF THE ARTICLES, IT WAS ABOUT PUTTING
20:53:31 WEST TAMPA BACK TO THE CHARACTERISTIC THAT IT IS, THAT IT
20:53:35 WAS ONCE BEFORE, BUT RIGHT NOW IT'S NOT.
20:53:38 BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF BUILDINGS THAT WE ARE GETTING.
20:53:40 THE NEIGHBORHOOD GETS A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT THAT'S IN THE
20:53:44 WEST TAMPA AREA NOW.
20:53:45 IT'S JUST APPROVED AND SO WE ARE GOING TO KEEP FIGHTING
20:53:48 UNTIL WE GET TO THE POINT WHERE THE OVERLAY IS USED LIKE IT
20:53:55 SUPPOSED TO DO.
20:53:56 YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SECOND ARTICLE FOR THE USF, UNIVERSITY
20:53:59 SOUTH FLORIDA, THIS IS THE MOST RECENT ARTICLE THAT WE HAVE
20:54:03 ABOUT THE RESPONSE FROM THE COMMUNITY, PEOPLE ACTUALLY COME
20:54:06 BACK TO THE COMMUNITY ABOUT THE REVITALIZATION, AND YOU CAN
20:54:11 SEE THE COSTILLOS WHO ARE ALSO PART OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
20:54:15 ASSOCIATION, THE OTHER ASSOCIATION THAT HELPED WITH THE
20:54:18 OVERLAY, THEY TALKED ABOUT HOW THE FAMILIES HAVE LIVED
20:54:22 GENERATIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:54:23 IF YOU GO TO THE SECOND PAGE, IT ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE
20:54:26 HOUSING IN THE OLD NEIGHBORHOOD, AND STARBUCK'S AND
20:54:30 EVERYTHING ELSE. WE KNOW ABOUT THAT STUFF.
20:54:32 YEAH, WE ARE CURRENT.
20:54:33 WE UNDERSTAND PEOPLE LIKE THOSE AMENITIES.
20:54:36 BUT WE ALSO LIKE TO HAVE THINGS BACK IN THE DAY.
20:54:41 IF YOU LOOK AT THE LAST PAGE THERE'S ONE THING IN PARTICULAR
20:54:43 THAT STOOD OUT IN THE ARTICLE.
20:54:45 SHE SAID ACCORDING TO STANDARD FROM THE NEW HOMES THAT ARE
20:54:47 BEING CONSTRUCTED, TO REQUESTED WITH THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE
20:54:53 NEIGHBORHOOD SHE GREW UP N.
20:54:54 THE OVERLAY WAS TO KEEP THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:54:57 AS MUCH AS YOU WANT, THAT'S ONE THING BUT YOU HAVE GOT TO
20:55:01 KEEP THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS WE HAVE WITH
20:55:05 TWO YEARS TO DO. WHEN YOU CAME TO US OVER 17 YEARS AGO TO
20:55:09 DO THIS OVERLAY, THE COMMUNITY COMPLIED WITH IT, AND HELPED
20:55:17 CREATE IT.
20:55:17 [BELL SOUNDS]
20:55:18 >>FRANK REDDICK: LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION.
20:55:20 >> YES, SIR.
20:55:21 >>FRANK REDDICK: WHAT RESPONSE ON THE COMMUNITY
20:55:26 ORGANIZATION HAVE FOR MR. COHEN WHEN HE INDICATED THAT $900
20:55:31 THAT YOU IT WOULD TAKE TO HELP BUILD A COMMUNITY WITH
20:55:34 SIDEWALKS AND OTHER THINGS?
20:55:35 WHAT WAS YOU ALL'S RESPONSE?
20:55:36 >> WELL, AS FAR AS THE SIDEWALKS?
20:55:41 THAT GOES TO THE TIF FUNDING FOR THE CRA.
20:55:43 AND --
20:55:45 >>FRANK REDDICK: JUST BECAUSE THE TIF FUND -- HE SAID HE
20:55:51 MET WITH YOU.
20:55:52 AND HE OFFERED YOU SOME OF THAT $920,000 DOLLARS FOR SPECIAL
20:55:57 PROJECTS IN --
20:56:00 >> NO, I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THAT PART.
20:56:02 I REMEMBER THE MEETING WE WENT TO.
20:56:05 >>FRANK REDDICK: WHAT WAS THAT?
20:56:07 >> NO, HE WAS BRINGING IT TO ME, THE WAY IT WAS INTERPRETED
20:56:10 TO ME, IT WE IT WOULDN'T GO TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
20:56:15 ASSOCIATIONS.
20:56:16 WOULD GO TO THE CRA.
20:56:17 THAT'S TIF -- TIF MONEY. TO ME THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THE
20:56:21 NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD HAVE.
20:56:21 >>FRANK REDDICK: I AM GOING TO LET HIM EXPLAIN HE WHEN
20:56:24 COMES BACK UP.
20:56:26 ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER.
20:56:26 >> MY NAME IS --
20:56:30 >>CHAIRMAN: EXCUSE ME FOR A SECOND.
20:56:31 >>YVONNE CAPIN: REBECCA.
20:56:36 I'M SORRY.
20:56:39 OR MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE.
20:56:40 EXPLAIN THE 900 SOME THOUSAND DOLLARS.
20:56:44 >>REBECCA KERT: I BELIEVE THAT WHAT THEY ARE REFERENCING IS
20:56:48 THE BONUS DENSITY PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THEM GREATER
20:56:51 DENSITY THAT IS ALREADY SET UP IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH
20:56:53 THE PROVISION.
20:56:55 WITH THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT, SHOULD YOU FEEL THAT
20:56:59 THIS ZONING IS APPROPRIATE, AND WANT TO ADOPT THE ZONING
20:57:02 PROVISION AGREEMENT, THERE'S A FORMULA IN THERE THAT
20:57:05 CALCULATES HOW MUCH EITHER MONEY THAT THEY HAVE TO PAY,
20:57:09 WHICH WOULD GO TO THE CITY FOR A PROJECT.
20:57:12 THERE ARE ALSO AN ADDITIONAL LIST OF CERTAIN ACTIONS OF THE
20:57:17 DEVELOPER'S ACTIONS THAT THEY CAN EITHER PAY THE MONEY, OR
20:57:20 DO SOME IMPROVEMENTS, OR SOME COMBINATION THEREOF, AT THE
20:57:25 DEVELOPER'S DISCRETION, AND I WROTE THEM DOWN.
20:57:28 I BELIEVE IT INCLUDES SIDEWALKS AND STREETSCAPE, THE LEED
20:57:32 CERTIFIED, UNDERGROUNDING.
20:57:35 >>YVONNE CAPIN: WHERE?
20:57:39 >>REBECCA KERT: THEY WOULD BE IN THIS AREA BUT WE CAN'T
20:57:41 COMMITTEE TO WHAT THEY WOULD BE AT THIS POINT.
20:57:43 THE DEVELOPER CAN HAVE ANY AGREEMENT HE WANTS WITH THOSE
20:57:46 PEOPLE BUT THE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE IS PURSUANT TO YOUR
20:57:48 CODE, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO IDENTIFY EXACTLY WHAT THOSE ARE
20:57:51 AT THIS POINT.
20:57:53 YOUR CODE ALLOWS THEM TO DO CERTAIN THINGS THAT WILL
20:57:56 CALCULATE TO A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF DENSITY.
20:58:02 SO IT'S A CALCULATION.
20:58:03 WE CAN'T SAY IT'S GOING OVER HERE.
20:58:07 THAT WON'T HAPPEN --
20:58:09 >>YVONNE CAPIN: THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW.
20:58:11 SO THE PETITIONER CANNOT SAY "I AM GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT
20:58:14 THIS PART OF THE 900 SOME THOUSAND DOLLARS GOES TO YOUR
20:58:20 NEIGHBORHOOD."
20:58:21 >> HE HAS SOME OPTIONS.
20:58:24 INSTEAD OF THE MONEY HE CANCHAS TO DO SOME IMPROVEMENTS BUT
20:58:27 THAT'S NOT REQUIRED IN THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT AND WE
20:58:30 DON'T DO THAT FOR THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
20:58:33 SO IF HE CHOOSES TO DO THAT, THAT'S BETWEEN HIM AND THE
20:58:38 NEIGHBORHOOD TO DO THE -- FOR THE DENSITY YOU HAVE TO DO
20:58:41 CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS BUT WE DON'T SAY WHO THEY ARE OR THOSE
20:58:44 TYPES OF THINGS.
20:58:45 >>YVONNE CAPIN: THANK YOU.
20:58:47 >>FRANK REDDICK: NEXT SPEAKER.
20:58:48 >> GOOD EVENING.
20:58:51 MY NAME IS LINDA McNIGHT AND I LIVE AT 1141 WEST NASSAU
20:58:56 STREET.
20:58:57 AND I AM STRONGLY AGAINST THIS PROJECT COMING INTO MY
20:59:01 NEIGHBORHOOD, BECAUSE OF ALL THE TRAFFIC.
20:59:04 EVERYBODY WENT OUT, GOES TO WALMART THAT'S ON KENNEDY.
20:59:09 I GO NASSAU, AND ON MY WAY HOME, CASS STREET AND ORIENT, YOU
20:59:15 CANNOT SEE.
20:59:16 YOU HAVE TO GO TO THE STOP SIGN, THEN YOU HAVE TO GO OUT A
20:59:20 LITTLE BIT, AND YOU HAVE TO BE GUESS YOUR WAY OUT BECAUSE
20:59:23 YOU CAN'T SEE.
20:59:24 AND ANOTHER REASON WHY I AM AGAINST IT IS BECAUSE ALL THE
20:59:27 COLLEGE STUDENTS THAT HAVE CAME TO MY NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY
20:59:31 HAVE A LOT OF PARTY, AND I HAVE A NEIGHBOR THAT ONE OF HER
20:59:37 FAMILY MEMBERS WAS AT WALMART, AND THE WAY THE COLLEGE
20:59:40 STUDENTS DRIVE, THEY WERE HIT AND KILLED.
20:59:45 I HAVE ANOTHER CO-WORKER THAT WAS COMING FROM THE FUNERAL
20:59:51 HOME.
20:59:52 HER CAR WAS STRUCK BY ONE OF THE COLLEGE STUDENT.
20:59:54 THEY JUMPED OUT OF THEIR CAR AND RAN.
20:59:56 SO I FEEL IF YOU BRING -- IF HE BRING ALL THESE COLLEGE
21:00:00 STUDENTS, SURE THEY HAVE PARKING SPACES BUT WHEN THEY HAVE
21:00:05 PARTIES, THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE GUESTS THAT'S GOING TO
21:00:07 PROBABLY PARK EVERYWHERE THEY CAN PARK.
21:00:10 AND THAT'S NOT -- I'M TOTALLY AGAINST IT.
21:00:13 THANK YOU.
21:00:13 >>FRANK REDDICK: NEXT SPEAKER.
21:00:15 >> MY NAME IS RUTH McNAIR.
21:00:31 AND I LIVE AT 1121 -- STREET.
21:00:36 I HAVE BEEN THERE 60 YEARS.
21:00:39 AND ALSO WHERE I LIVE, AND THAT'S WHY I FOUGHT SO HARD TO
21:00:45 TRY TO KEEP THE NEIGHBORHOOD STRAIGHT AND SAFE.
21:00:52 MR. COHEN CAME TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING LAST MONTH AND HE
21:00:55 TOLD US ABOUT HE WANTS TO BRING THESE COLLEGE STUDENTS FOR
21:01:02 THEM.
21:01:02 BUT THAT'S THE PROBLEM WE HAD.
21:01:04 YOU REMEMBER, WHEN THEY HAD THE CONVENTION HERE WE HAD A
21:01:11 PROBLEM WITH THEM.
21:01:12 WE HAD TO GET -- THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO ACT.
21:01:19 SO WE DON'T WANT MULTIPLE FAMILIES BUILT INTO OUR
21:01:25 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:01:26 WHEN I BOUGHT AND BOUGHT MY HOUSE LIKE I SAID 60 YEARS, I
21:01:32 LOVE WRITE LIVE.
21:01:33 I DON'T HAVE NO PLACE ELSE TO GO.
21:01:36 AND PEOPLE COME IN NOW, BUT I DON'T PLAN ON GOING ANYWHERE.
21:01:44 BUT I WOULD REALLY LAKE FOR YOU TO TRY TO HELP US PROTECT
21:01:49 WHERE WE LIVE.
21:01:52 I LIVE ABOUT A BLOCK AND A HALF FROM THIS PROJECT THAT YOU
21:01:58 ARE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW.
21:02:00 BECAUSE I LIVE RIGHT AT -- I'M NOT REALLY PLEASED ABOUT THIS
21:02:06 PROJECT COMING INTO US, NOT THE WAY IT IS.
21:02:09 SO MAYBE SOMETHING BUT NOT THAT.
21:02:12 THANK YOU SO MUCH.
21:02:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:02:16 NEXT SPEAKER.
21:02:17 >> GOOD EVENING.
21:02:23 MY NAME IS ROBERT DUDSKI, 2114 WEST CASS STREET.
21:02:29 FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK MY FELLOW NEIGHBORS, NORTH
21:02:31 HYDE PARK, YOU GUYS INSPIRE ME.
21:02:36 FOR AS MANY OF YOU WHO HAVE SHOWN UP TONIGHT ON THIS AGENDA.
21:02:43 AS THE APPLICANT, ABC CAPITAL AND CAPITAL AS RELATED IN
21:02:54 ASSETS ABOUT THE NET WORTH OF A CORPORATION.
21:02:56 AND THIS PROJECT IS ABOUT FINANCIAL GAIN FOR ABC CAPITAL.
21:03:05 IT'S NOT ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:03:06 IT'S NOT ABOUT ARCHITECTURAL EFFECT OR ANYTHING.
21:03:10 IF YOU GOOGLE RUSSIA, THERE'S ONE OF THE PICTURES THAT SHOWS
21:03:16 UP AND THERE'S THE PROJECT ON THE BOTTOM.
21:03:18 THIS PROJECT DOES NOTHING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:03:25 IT'S A FUTURE SLUM.
21:03:26 THE WAY THEY ARE BUILDING APARTMENT OUT HERE, RAINING ON
21:03:32 THEM, TURNING THEM INTO BIG MOLD HOUSES.
21:03:35 YET THEY ARE BUILDING THEM EVERYWHERE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE
21:03:37 THE MONEY IS AT RIGHT NOW, AND THE CAPITAL REFLECTS.
21:03:43 THE CITY CAN MAKE SOME MONEY.
21:03:45 WHAT, $920,000.
21:03:49 AND THEY CALL IT BONUS.
21:03:51 I FIND THAT WORD A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE AND A MISUSE OF THE
21:03:55 WORD.
21:03:56 THE BONUS IS FOR THE DEVELOPER AND THE BONUS IS FOR THE
21:03:59 CITY.
21:04:00 THE LOSERS ARE THE NEIGHBORHOODS, THE TAXPAYERS OF TAMPA,
21:04:05 AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
21:04:08 BY THE PROSTITUTION OF GREEN SPACE, AND THE PEACE OF MANED
21:04:12 OF THE PEOPLE.
21:04:18 SO IT'S 1 MINUTE 8 SECONDS LEFT IN MY THREE MINUTES THAT I
21:04:21 AM ENTITLED TO.
21:04:55 (SPEAKING SPANISH)
21:04:56 [BELL SOUNDS]
21:04:57 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:05:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: EXCUSE ME.
21:05:07 I DID NOT INTERRUPT THAT AND IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT PERHAPS
21:05:09 THE MAJORITY OF CITY COUNCIL MIGHT HAVE UNDERSTOOD THAT,
21:05:12 THAT'S TRUE.
21:05:13 BUT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, PERHAPS -- AND I DON'T
21:05:19 WANT TO TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME BUT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE
21:05:21 FACT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THIS AUDIENCE WHO PERHAPS DID
21:05:26 NOT UNDERSTAND THIS.
21:05:27 SO --
21:05:34 >>FRANK REDDICK: WE DON'T NEED TO HEAR IT.
21:05:36 THANK YOU, SIR.
21:05:36 NEXT SPEAKER.
21:05:37 >> GOOD EVENING COUNCILMAN.
21:05:41 I'M LUE SHEARED. I LIVE ABOUT A BLOCK FROM THIS PROPOSED
21:05:53 UNIT THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE BUILT.
21:05:55 I'M THE SECRETARY FOR THE WEST RIVERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME
21:05:58 WATCH AND I DON'T REMEMBER AN APPLICANT MENTIONING ANYTHING
21:06:03 ABOUT THE MONEY FOR THE 900,000.
21:06:08 NONE OF THAT WAS IN MY MINUTES.
21:06:10 AND SECOND, I WANT TO SAY, THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA HAS
21:06:18 ENOUGH MONEY TO TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE.
21:06:20 THEY ARE BUILDING TWO DORMITORIES RIGHT NOW.
21:06:23 AND WHAT I HAVE SEEN AND HEARD, WE HAVE A UNIVERSITY OF
21:06:25 TAMPA REPRESENTATIVE WHO COMES TO OUR MEETING SEVERAL YEARS
21:06:29 AGO, AND THE STUDENTS, THEY PREFER TO LIVE OFF CAMPUS.
21:06:36 THERE ARE PLENTY OF CONDOS, APARTMENTS, AROUND US THAT THEY
21:06:39 CAN LIVE IN, AND THEY DO WALK.
21:06:41 BUT A LOT OF THEM PREFER TO LIVE IN THE HOUSES SO THEY CAN
21:06:44 BE FREE AND DO THEIR OWN THING.
21:06:47 SO WHAT I'M SAYING, I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS BECAUSE IT'S
21:06:50 REALLY GOING TO BRING IN MORE PARKING.
21:06:53 I'M NOT OPPOSED AGAINST SINGLE OR ATTACHED FAMILY HOMES. WE
21:06:58 KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CHANGING.
21:06:59 BUT FOR OUR SENIOR CITIZENS, TRYING TO DRIVE -- I LIVE RIGHT
21:07:05 ACROSS CASS -- THEY CAN HARDLY GET ACROSS CASS TO GET TO
21:07:08 WHERE THEY ARE GOING.
21:07:09 WE HAVE A LOT OF SENIORS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:07:11 AND WE JUST NEED TO BE MORE COGNIZANT OF THEM.
21:07:14 AND ALSO, WE ARE WORKING WITH THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT
21:07:18 ABOUT PARKING.
21:07:19 YOU KNOW, WE GOT IN A PARKING.
21:07:22 MRS. McNAIR WAS ABLE TO GET NO-PARKING SIGNS AND WE STILL
21:07:27 HAVE TO CALL TPD NONEMERGENCY NUMBER BECAUSE THEY ARE
21:07:31 PARKING ILLEGAL.
21:07:32 WE GOT ALL THE GYMS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WE ALSO HAVE TO
21:07:38 BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE LOADING DOCKS, AND ALL OF THIS.
21:07:41 IT'S KIND OF OVERWHELMING FOR THE SENIOR FAMILY HOUSING.
21:07:45 IT TOOK US A MINUTE TO GET USED TO THE DOMAIN HOUSES.
21:07:48 BIG HOUSES, LITTLE HOUSES, YOU KNOW.
21:07:50 AND WE KNOW TIMES ARE CHANGING BUT WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOU ALL
21:07:53 TO THINK ABOUT US AS LONG-TIME RESIDENTS.
21:07:56 I HAVE BEEN THERE 35 YEARS.
21:07:58 AND WE JUST WANT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO STAY THE WAY THE BEST
21:08:09 PLACE TO LIVE.
21:08:12 THANK YOU.
21:08:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:08:13 NEXT SPEAKER.
21:08:14 >> [OFF MICROPHONE] MY NAME IS ROB -- I'M A RESIDENT OF
21:08:20 WEST TAMPA.
21:08:22 AND --
21:08:28 >>YVONNE CAPIN: YOU KEEP MOVING TO THE LEFT. YOU NEED TO
21:08:29 GET OVER TO THE SIDE.
21:08:30 >> I'M A YOUNG PROFESSIONAL SO THE PEOPLE BEHIND ME.
21:08:38 I'M CONCERNED, THE AREA LIKE SUBURBIA, IT'S OKAY, WITH
21:08:45 DENSITY WITH OUR RETAIL.
21:08:46 SO WE ARE MAKING KIND OF LIKE A LITTLE TAMPA HERE BUT
21:08:50 DENSER.
21:08:52 WE THINK ABOUT TRANSIT IN THE COMMITTEE.
21:08:53 IF YOU WANT TRANSIT YOU NEED PLACES WHERE PEOPLE WORK, LIVE,
21:08:57 EAT.
21:08:58 YOU CAN HAVE THAT IN OUR PLACE ONLY HAVE 400 SQUARE FOOT OF
21:09:02 RETAIL.
21:09:04 WE TALK ABOUT PARKING ISSUES.
21:09:06 WE TALK ABOUT TRAFFIC.
21:09:07 WELL, WE ARE GETTING IN OUR CARS SOMEWHERE TO BE GO TO EAT,
21:09:11 TO GO TO WORK.
21:09:12 IF YOU DON'T HAVE COMPONENTS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT'S
21:09:14 WHERE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS COME IN.
21:09:16 THE PROJECTS WITHOUT ANY RETAIL, HOW ABOUT A SQUARE?
21:09:22 IN A RETAIL.
21:09:24 MINORA, NO RETAIL.
21:09:26 THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON ROME AND GRAY STREET.
21:09:30 IN A RETAIL.
21:09:33 IT'S AN IMPROVEMENT, BUT AGAIN WE ARE CREATING A LITTLE
21:09:35 PLACE IN NORTH HYDE PARK.
21:09:41 AND I CAN HEAR VACANCIES ON CHANNELSIDE KEEP FROM PROVIDING
21:09:44 RETAIL.
21:09:45 THOSE VACANCIES ON CHANNELSIDE, THEN CREATING MORE RETAIL IN
21:09:49 CHANNELSIDE.
21:09:52 EVEN PROJECTS IN HYDE PARK, SQUARE HAD RETAIL.
21:09:57 NO VACANCIES THERE.
21:10:00 RETAIL AND APARTMENT, NO VACANCIES THERE.
21:10:05 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AND YBOR.
21:10:06 THOSE ARE GOING TO HAVE APARTMENTS AND SUBSTANTIAL RETAIL.
21:10:09 BUT SOMEHOW NOT IN HYDE PARK.
21:10:14 THANK YOU.
21:10:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:10:17 NEXT SPEAKER.
21:10:17 >> MY NAME IS JAMIE WILCZYNSKI, 1606 6th STREET.
21:10:26 AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:10:28 I ALSO AM A YOUNG PROFESSIONAL.
21:10:31 AND ANYONE HERE THAT HAS SEEN ME WALKING WITH MY YELLOW LAB
21:10:36 KNOWS HOW FRIENDLY SHE IS.
21:10:38 SO I GOT TO MEET PLENTY OF PEOPLE AT THE PLAZA AND SQUARE
21:10:43 AND ALL THE OTHER HOUSES WITHIN THAT AREA.
21:10:45 AND I WOULD SAY WELL OVER 90% OF THE PEOPLE LOVE LIVING IN
21:10:51 THIS AREA.
21:10:52 THE ONE THING THEY ALL WOULD WANT TO DO IS HAVE SOMEPLACE TO
21:10:55 WALK TO.
21:10:57 BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS JUST APARTMENTS COMING UP.
21:10:59 NO RETAIL.
21:11:00 AND AS YOU CAN TELL FROM EVERYONE ELSE, THAT THE PARKING IS
21:11:03 THE ONE THING THAT WE ALL WANT IS MORE RETAIL, AND THE AREA
21:11:08 SO WE CAN BRING OUR DOGS TO THERE OR ANYONE ELSE.
21:11:14 AND THE ONE DETRIMENT TO THE AREA IS THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA
21:11:18 STUDENTS.
21:11:19 WITH PARKING, PARTIES, AND HAVING -- THEY MIGHT GO TO THAT
21:11:27 APARTMENT COMPLEX BUT THEY WILL STILL BE IN OTHER AREAS OF
21:11:31 THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE KNOW IT'S NOT GOING TO STOP.
21:11:34 SO THE PARKING AROUND US IS ATROCIOUS.
21:11:39 ESPECIALLY THE NEWEST APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT CAME UP.
21:11:44 AND WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH TPD, AND THEY ALSO KNOW THAT
21:11:48 THEY ARE THE ISSUE IN THE AREA.
21:11:51 SO WE GREATLY ARE OPPOSED TO HAVING MORE APARTMENTS POP UP
21:11:56 IN THE AREA AND WE ALSO KNOW THAT THERE'S ONE THAT'S COMING
21:11:58 UP AT THE GRAY BETWEEN ROME AND FREMONT.
21:12:03 AND WE WANT, I THINK, BE HAVING RETAIL IS SOMETHING THAT CAN
21:12:10 BRING THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD, NORTH OF WILLOW -- I'M SORRY,
21:12:15 NORTH OF CASS, AND EVERYONE CAN COME TOGETHER AND ENJOY THAT
21:12:21 AREA A LOT MORE THAN APARTMENT.
21:12:27 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:12:27 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT, ANYONE ELSE?
21:12:30 ALL RIGHT.
21:12:32 IS ANYBODY ELSE GOING TO SPEAK AFTER THIS PERSON HERE?
21:12:35 IF YOU CAN STAND, PLEASE STAND, ALL RIGHT?
21:12:37 WE NEED TO KNOW HOW MANY MORE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SPEAK.
21:12:40 IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS SUNSET, YOU NEED -- IF YOU
21:12:43 CAN STAND, PLEASE STAND.
21:12:44 ALL RIGHT.
21:12:46 THAT PERSON THERE.
21:12:47 >> COULD YOU GIVE ME YOUR NAME, PLEASE?
21:12:50 >> REBECCA JONES.
21:12:53 THAT'S JUST AN AUTHORIZATION, AND I'M WITH THE LAW FIRM
21:12:57 MCFARLAND FERGUSON, AND I'M HERE REPRESENTING THEM.
21:13:00 >> AND THE NAME OF THE PERSON YOU ARE REPRESENTING?
21:13:02 >> ENGRAVING.
21:13:04 AND THEY ARE LOCATED AT 502 NORTH WILLOW.
21:13:07 THEY ARE TWO BLOCKS SOUTH OF THE PROJECT.
21:13:10 AND THEY JUST WANTED ME TO COME STATE ON THE RECORD THAT
21:13:12 THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.
21:13:14 AND THEY RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE PROJECT.
21:13:17 THANK YOU.
21:13:18 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:13:19 >> MY NAME IS RABBI -- AND I WAS TEN YEARS AT THE UNIVERSITY
21:13:25 OF TAMPA, AND I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BACKGROUND
21:13:36 FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS.
21:13:37 SINCE 2007, STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA WERE
21:13:42 PROVIDING AND SUPPORTIVE AND POSITIVE JEWISH EXPERIENCE.
21:13:45 IN THIS CAPACITY, I'M AWARE AND IN TUNE WITH SOME OF THE
21:13:49 CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS AT VARIOUS REASONS WHY THEY CANNOT
21:13:55 LIVE ANYMORE ON CAMPUS AND THEY HAVE TO GO OFF OF CAMPUS.
21:14:02 AND THE DIFFICULTIES IN FINDING A PLACE TO LIVE.
21:14:06 SOME OF THEM END UP HAVING TO FIND HOUSING UP AT USF.
21:14:15 FOR STUDENTS FOR DORMITORY.
21:14:17 AND I PERSONALLY KNOW MANY STUDENT THAT HAVE HOUSING MORE
21:14:21 THAN TEN MILES AWAY, AND CAUSING THEM ON DALE MABRY WHICH IS
21:14:30 QUITE A BIKE RIDE AWAY.
21:14:32 BIKES, ROLLER BLADE OR ROLLER SKATES OR SOME OTHER WAY TO
21:14:35 COME TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA IS A DANGEROUS SITUATION TO
21:14:38 TRAVEL TO THEIR CLASS.
21:14:39 IN ADDITION, THIS NEIGHBORHOOD STARTED TO BE DEVELOPED, AND
21:14:43 IT IS LOCATED SO CLOSE TO UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
21:14:46 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA IS GROWING AND 2,000 STUDENTS, MORE THAN
21:14:53 9,000 STUDENT, AND THIS WOULD BE A GREAT ADDITION TO
21:15:01 STUDENTS OFF OF CAMPUS, WOULD BE FIVE MINUTES TO THEIR
21:15:05 CLASSES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
21:15:06 THEREFORE, I'M IN SUPPORT OF MORE STUDENTS HOUSING OFF OF
21:15:10 CAMPUS FOR I MYSELF INVESTED IN BUILDING A JEWISH COMMUNITY
21:15:16 FOR THE SUPPORT OF THESE STUDENTS, AND WE OWN A PIECE OF
21:15:19 PROPERTY BETWEEN MORGAN AND WILLOW LOCATED -- THAT SERVES
21:15:29 BOTH STUDENTS AND EMOTIONALLY. THIS WOULD BE AROUND THE
21:15:32 CORNER.
21:15:32 A THREE MINUTE WALK FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT, AND A LOT OF
21:15:38 THE COMMUNITY INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:15:45 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA STUDENTS ARE NOT GOING AWAY.
21:15:47 THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CHANGING.
21:15:50 IF WE WANT TO HAVE AS NICE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ACCEPT OBVIOUSLY
21:15:58 GOOD ADDITIONS AND TRYING TO HELP THEM BUILD IT.
21:16:01 BUT OTHERWISE THEY WILL BE LEFT WITH PARCELS OF LAND LAKE IT
21:16:06 HAS BEEN FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS, WITH EMPTY LOTS, NOTHING
21:16:10 HAPPENING.
21:16:11 SO THE BEST THING FOR THE CITY IS TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN.
21:16:14 AND I THINK THAT'S IT.
21:16:19 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
21:16:22 MR. GRANDOFF.
21:16:23 >>MIKE SUAREZ: MS. SAMANIEGO, YOU MADE A COMMENT DURING
21:16:34 YOUR PRESENTATION.
21:16:35 THE OVERLAY DISTRICT.
21:16:37 IS THIS PART OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY?
21:16:39 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES, SIR.
21:16:40 >>MIKE SUAREZ: AND YOU MENTIONED MR. CALLAHAN BUT HE'S NOT
21:16:44 HERE.
21:16:46 HE LEFT PRETTY QUICK, I GUESS.
21:16:48 I'M CURIOUS.
21:16:49 IN TERMS OF THE OVERLAY, AND THERE WAS SOME MENTION OF THE
21:16:53 WEST RIVER SUBDIVISION PROCESS, IS THERE ANYTHING IN THIS
21:16:58 PROJECT THAT, YOU KNOW, MINUS THE THINGS THAT YOU HAVE
21:17:01 ALREADY MENTIONED AS PART OF YOUR REPORT, THAT HAS MORE IN
21:17:06 THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT, THAT SHOULD BE LOOKED AT
21:17:09 THAT YOU ARE NOT LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW?
21:17:12 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: NO.
21:17:14 MARY SAMANIEGO FOR THE RECORD.
21:17:15 THIS HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY REVIEWED BY THE URBAN DESIGN TEAM
21:17:18 FOR COMPLIANCE OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND WAS FOUND TO BE
21:17:22 IN COMPLIANCE.
21:17:22 THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DOES NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT WHEN WE
21:17:26 HAVE A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
21:17:27 >>MIKE SUAREZ: CAN I ASK WHY NOT?
21:17:31 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: IT'S JUST NOT PART OF THE CODE.
21:17:33 >>MIKE SUAREZ: YOU ARE THE -- IN YOUR EXPERTISE, AS AN
21:17:40 URBAN PLANNER, IS IT BETTER TO HAVE THOSE KIND OF ELEMENTS
21:17:43 IN THERE WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO BUILD AN URBAN VILLAGE AND
21:17:47 OVERLAY, AND YET WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION WITH ONE OTHER
21:17:50 PROJECT ABOUT HOW THAT GOES IN, AND, YOU KNOW, DOESN'T IT
21:17:56 KIND OF SEEM LIKE THERE SHOULD BE -- ASKING THE QUESTION
21:18:01 BASED ON, YOU KNOW, THE TENETS OF WHAT AN OVERLAY SHOULD
21:18:05 HAVE?
21:18:05 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, YES,
21:18:09 TYPICALLY AN URBAN VILLAGE HAS ALL COMPONENTS OF KIND OF
21:18:12 ALIVE, WORK, PLAY ENVIRONMENT WHERE THERE'S A RETAIL
21:18:16 COMPONENT.
21:18:17 RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT AND TYPICALLY, HISTORICALLY, THE
21:18:22 EUCLIDEAN ZONING, GENERALLY LOCATED ON SEPARATE LOTS, A
21:18:26 COMMERCIAL PART OF THE TOWN OR NEIGHBORHOOD, THE RESIDENTIAL
21:18:31 PORTION, AND THEN THE OFFICE PORTION.
21:18:34 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MORE INNOVATIVE PLANNING
21:18:38 TECHNIQUE, WE TRY TO ENCOURAGE VERT LIP INTEGRATED PROJECTS
21:18:43 WHICH MEANS ONE BUILDING WITH MULTIPLE USES SUCH AS RETAIL
21:18:46 OFFICES ON THE FIRST FLOOR, RESIDENTIAL, SOMETHING LIKE
21:18:49 THAT.
21:18:49 BUT CERTAINLY THAT COULD OCCUR, AND THERE WOULD BE AN
21:18:52 APPROPRIATE -- A PATTERN IN THE URBAN VILLAGE AND CERTAINLY
21:18:57 IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN A COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 LAND
21:19:01 USE CATEGORY.
21:19:01 BUT AGAIN IT'S A QUESTION OF IS IT SUPPORTIVE, AND IT
21:19:05 TRANSLATES INTO THE CODE, AND THE OVERLAY STANDARD IS NOT
21:19:09 REQUIRED.
21:19:10 >>MIKE SUAREZ: ONE LAST QUESTION.
21:19:12 IT LOOKS LIKE -- I WANT TO MAKE SURE I GOT THIS RIGHT AFTER
21:19:16 LOOKING AT THE PLAN AND READING THE REPORT.
21:19:20 THE ONLY RETAIL 425 SQUARE FEET?
21:19:26 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THAT'S IT.
21:19:28 NO REQUIREMENT FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO.
21:19:31 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I GOT IT.
21:19:32 I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THE NUMBER WAS CORRECT.
21:19:34 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
21:19:35 >> COUNCILMAN SUAREZ SAID A LOT OF WHAT I WANTED TO SAY BUT
21:19:45 THE CODE AMENDED WHERE -- OBVIOUSLY WE CAN'T DO THIS RIGHT
21:19:50 NOW, BUT SINCE I HAVE BEEN HERE WE HAVE INCLUDED SEVERAL
21:19:52 APARTMENT COMPLEXES, RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXES IN THIS AREA.
21:19:56 IF YOU WANT A REAL NEIGHBORHOOD FEEL, YOU NEED THE LIVE,
21:19:59 WORK AND PLAY ENVIRONMENT.
21:20:01 WHY WAS YBOR CITY SO SUCCESSFUL?
21:20:03 BECAUSE YOU HAD RESIDENTIAL.
21:20:04 YOU HAD COMMERCIAL.
21:20:05 YOU HAD THE TRANSPORTATION CONCEPT OF IT.
21:20:08 BUT IN NORTH HYDE PARK, IT'S BECOMING A CONCRETE JUNGLE.
21:20:13 YOU HAVE THE DENSITY.
21:20:15 YOU KNOW, WE NEED WHEN WE DISCUSS TRANSPORTATION, AND THE
21:20:18 BUS AND EVERYTHING ELSE COMING THROUGH.
21:20:19 BUT 400 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, I'M BREAKING IT DOWN TO I'M
21:20:24 ASSUMING THE CLEANERS, THE COFFEE SHOPS, THAT IS CONSIDERED
21:20:29 WITHIN THAT 400 SQUARE FEET, CORRECT?
21:20:32 AND THEN --
21:20:40 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
21:20:44 >> THE CONCEPT IS RETAIL.
21:20:46 THINK OF THE ARMATURE WORKS.
21:20:51 IT'S RETAIL.
21:20:54 THE AIRPORT.
21:20:55 TEN FEET.
21:20:56 TEN FEET.
21:20:57 AND THEY LINE UP FOR ICE CREAM AND COFFEE.
21:21:00 SO THE OTHER CONCEPT, IF WE CREATE THIS RETAIL ON THE GROUND
21:21:07 FLOOR, ALL THE BUILDINGS THAT YOU SAW THAT ARE WITHIN A 2,
21:21:13 3-BLOCK RADIUS ALL UP AND DOWN WILLOW IN THAT AREA, THAT'S
21:21:17 WHERE THE RETAIL.
21:21:19 IF THIS IS SUCCESSFUL THAT'S WHERE THE RETAIL -- THAT'S
21:21:23 WHERE PEOPLE WILL WANT TO PUT THEIR RETAIL.
21:21:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LOOKING FORWARD TO THE FUTURE WHEN MORE
21:21:29 OF THESE COME UP BEFORE US, AND AS I MENTIONED, REVISITING
21:21:32 THE CODE, AND WHATNOT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS TO REQUIRE
21:21:36 RETAIL.
21:21:37 BECAUSE WHEN YOU ARE SO CLOSE TO KENNEDY BOULEVARD, IT'S
21:21:39 DANGEROUS TO CROSS THAT STREET.
21:21:41 YOU HAVE OPTIONS, FOR EXAMPLE, DUNKIN' DONUTS AND STARBUCK'S
21:21:45 AND OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS ACROSS, SO PEOPLE THAT LIVE NORTH
21:21:49 OF KENNEDY, THEY WANT TO BE WITHIN SAFE WALKING DISTANCE
21:21:51 WITHOUT HAVING TO CROSS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.
21:21:55 AND ALL RIGHT.
21:21:56 I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY.
21:21:57 >> MR. COHEN: AND THAT'S WHY IT'S SUCH AN IDEAL SPOT FOR
21:22:02 THE RETAIL, THAT WILL COME AROUND THE OFFICES AND INDUSTRIAL
21:22:07 PLACES.
21:22:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
21:22:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WAS JUST LISTENING HERE.
21:22:13 AND YBOR CITY WAS MENTIONED.
21:22:14 YBOR CITY HAS GONE THROUGH THREE OR FOUR CHANGEOVERS.
21:22:18 FROM THE 20s TO THE 40s, FROM THE 40s TO THE 60s WAS
21:22:23 DIFFERENT.
21:22:24 AND THE EXPRESSWAY CAME ON AND IT REALLY GOT DIFFERENT.
21:22:27 THEN YOU HAD NOTHING BUT DRUG ADDICTS, PROSTITUTION, AND
21:22:31 TUMBLEWEED.
21:22:32 AND THEN THE -- PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS ON CPR.
21:22:41 THEN ONE BAR OPEN AND SOMEONE HAD TO LEAVE.
21:22:46 THEN ANOTHER BAR OWNER AND THE RENT WENT HEY.
21:22:48 SO WE ARE CHASING OURSELVES HERE.
21:22:51 YBOR CITY WAS A WONDERFUL PLACE.
21:22:53 IT STILL IS.
21:22:54 BUT IT AIN'T THE SAME.
21:22:57 YOU HAVE TRANSPORTATION.
21:22:58 YOU HAD HORSEBACK.
21:23:00 YOU HAD BICYCLES.
21:23:01 PEOPLE HAD A COW IN THE BACKYARD, GET, CHICKEN, YOU NAME IT.
21:23:06 ITSELF WHAT THE WILD WEST IN A WAY.
21:23:09 BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT HISTORICALLY, TWO THINGS, THE
21:23:13 LOTTERY AND HEALTH CARE.
21:23:14 WE CALLED IT BOLITA, AND, YOU KNOW, BUT ILLEGAL WHEN THE
21:23:23 GOVERNMENT WASN'T MAKING THE MONEY, THE PEOPLE WERE.
21:23:29 BUT IN THIS, YOU HAVE GOT TO BE CRAZY.
21:23:33 YBOR CITY IS DIFFERENT.
21:23:34 YBOR CITY IS UNIQUE.
21:23:35 YBOR CITY WAS A HAPPENING THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.
21:23:40 NEVER.
21:23:41 IT WAS ALL IMMIGRANTS.
21:23:43 THE PEOPLE, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT BROUGHT YBOR CITY.
21:23:47 THEY COULDN'T COME INTO THE COUNTRY NOW IF THEY WANTED TO.
21:23:50 I GET A LITTLE UPSET WHEN I HEAR ABOUT YBOR CITY.
21:23:54 THE SAME BUT NOT THE SAME.
21:23:56 WE TALK ABOUT RETAIL.
21:23:58 WHEN I LIVED DOWNTOWN, RETAIL.
21:24:01 DOWNTOWN WAS BOOMING WITH RETAIL.
21:24:06 WITH MACY'S NOW.
21:24:09 THEN YOU HAD FIVE OR SIX YEARS, TAMPA THEATER, FLORIDA
21:24:14 THEATER, STATE THEATER.
21:24:19 WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM?
21:24:20 TELL ME.
21:24:26 THEY DIED.
21:24:28 BECAUSE THE PEOPLE LEFT.
21:24:31 WHEN THE RESIDENTS LEAVE, RETAIL GOES WITH IT.
21:24:34 WHEN THE RESIDENT GET THERE, RETAIL COMES WITH IT.
21:24:44 BUILD TWO SHOPPING CENTERS, NORTH GATE WAS ONE, AND THE ON
21:24:47 THE ONE WAS ON FLORIDA AVENUE.
21:24:49 WHAT HAPPENED?
21:24:51 PEOPLE WANT SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
21:24:53 THEY GOT IT.
21:24:56 THEY WERE A DIFFERENT TIME.
21:24:57 THERE WERE NO COMPUTERS.
21:24:58 THERE WAS VERY LITTLE -- THERE CERTAINLY WAS NO CELL PHONE.
21:25:02 YOU HAD A STREETCAR.
21:25:04 YOU GOT NOTHING NOW.
21:25:07 THE OLD BECOMES THE NEW AND THE NEW BECOMES THE OLD.
21:25:10 THAT'S HOW LIFE IS.
21:25:12 NO MATTER WHAT TYPE OF PERSON YOU ARE, YOU HAVE TO HAVE
21:25:15 SOMETHING TO HANG YOUR HAT ON.
21:25:19 THANKS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:25:19 >>YVONNE CAPIN: YOU KNOW, I DO UNDERSTAND THE RETAIL
21:25:25 COMPONENT BEING A NEGATIVE.
21:25:29 ABSOLUTELY.
21:25:31 I HAVE BEEN IN SMALL RETAIL MY ENTIRE LIFE.
21:25:33 YOU HAVE TO HAVE CRITICAL MASS.
21:25:35 THEN THEY WILL COME, IF IT WARRANTS THE RETAIL.
21:25:41 BECAUSE RETAILERS ARE CAPITALISTS.
21:25:44 THEY HAVE TO MAKE MONEY.
21:25:45 IT'S NOT -- JUST BECAUSE YOU OPEN THE DOOR, PUT THE SPACE,
21:25:50 DOES NOT MEAN IT GOING TO GET FILLED.
21:25:53 IT JUST ISN'T.
21:25:55 THERE ARE MALLS THAT HAVE CLOSED DOWN.
21:25:58 AND BE WHEN IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE RETAIL COMPONENT, THE
21:26:03 BANKERS WOULD CONSIDER A NEGATIVE, I UNDERSTOOD THAT.
21:26:07 ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTAND.
21:26:08 LOOK HOW LONG IT TOOK US TO GET RETAIL IN CHANNELSIDE.
21:26:15 IT HAS TO REACH THAT CRITICAL MASS, BECAUSE THE RETAILERS
21:26:18 ARE GOING TO LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS.
21:26:22 SO FOR DEVELOPERS TO PUT RETAIL DOESN'T MANY RETAIL IS GOING
21:26:27 TO MOVE IN AT ALL.
21:26:31 SO I FEEL LIKE I WANTED TO SAY THAT.
21:26:33 MY WHOLE ENTIRE LIVE I HAD ALL RETAIL IN MALLS.
21:26:37 AND SO I UNDERSTAND THAT PART.
21:26:39 AND AS FAR AS THE OTHER PART, I DROVE THROUGH THERE THE
21:26:45 OTHER DAY LOOKING AT DIFFERENT PROJECTS, AND YET THE PARKING
21:26:52 IS HORRENDOUS.
21:26:53 IT IS REALLY OPEN-IT REALLY BAD.
21:26:57 AND YOU HAVE PEOPLE -- ONE OF THE THINGS I UNDERSTAND IS
21:27:01 THAT THE APARTMENTS, WHAT'S HAPPENING IS THE RENT HAS BEEN
21:27:05 GOING UP.
21:27:07 INSTEAD OF HAVING ONE TENANT, YOU HAVE TWO LIVING IN THE
21:27:12 SAME APARTMENT.
21:27:12 THEREFORE, YOU HAVE TWO CARS.
21:27:15 THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENING.
21:27:17 IN THAT AREA.
21:27:20 UNFORTUNATELY.
21:27:24 BUT THAT'S IT.
21:27:26 I JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THE RETAIL.
21:27:28 SO I'M GOOD.
21:27:29 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:27:38 I WANT TO CLARIFY A POINT.
21:27:40 FIRST OF ALL I NEVER MET THE RAN BAY.
21:27:42 HOWEVER, HIS COMMENTS TO YOU THIS EVENING ARE CLEARLY
21:27:45 COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
21:27:47 HE LIVED THE UNIVERSITY TAMPA EXPERIENCE.
21:27:50 HE UNDERSTANDS THE MARKET DEMAND FOR HOUSING.
21:27:52 HE UNDERSTANDS THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:27:54 I ASK THAT YOU LISTEN TO HIS COMMENTS.
21:27:56 I HAVE NEVER MET HIM BEFORE BUT HE'S VERY INSIGHTFUL IN WHAT
21:28:01 HE'S TELLING YOU.
21:28:03 THE BONUS AGREEMENT.
21:28:04 LET'S TALK ABOUT WHAT THE CODE REQUIRES.
21:28:10 AND THEY WILL PROVIDE IMPROVEMENT FOR USE OF THE GENERAL
21:28:17 PUBLIC LOCATED WITHIN A PUBLIC EASEMENT, PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
21:28:20 OR PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAME MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION
21:28:23 IMPACT FEE AS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WHICH BE IS
21:28:28 ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS.
21:28:29 THESE WERE LISTED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
21:28:31 THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT I RECITED TO YOU IN MY PRESENTATION.
21:28:34 THAT'S WHERE THE MONEY GOES.
21:28:41 HERE IS THE COMMENTS ABOUT THE CASS STREET ELEVATION.
21:28:44 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
21:28:52 HERE IS THE CASS STREET ELEVATION.
21:28:56 VERY NICE STREETSCAPE, WALKWAY.
21:28:58 THERE IS NO LANDSCAPE WAIVER BEING REQUESTED.
21:29:01 IN FACT, ON PAGE 5 AT THE BOTTOM, CODE REQUIRES A 30% OF
21:29:10 OFF-SITE AREA NOT OCCUPIED BY BUILDING SAWYER GREEN SPACE.
21:29:15 THE BUILDING PLAN SHOWED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS.
21:29:19 HERE IS THE CORNER OF CASS STREET AND WILLOW THAT MR. COHEN
21:29:21 JUST PROVIDED TO ME.
21:29:26 AS FOR THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY, AND THE FINDINGS BY MR.
21:29:29 CALLAHAN, ON PAGE 4 AT THE TOP, STAFF FIND IT CONSISTENT
21:29:44 WITH THE WTOL, WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
21:29:49 HE ASKED THAT THE APPLICANT WORK WITH THE URBAN DESIGN STAFF
21:29:52 TO IMPROVE THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE GARAGE TO BETTER EMULATE
21:29:56 THE THAN FACADES OF THE MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE.
21:29:58 MR. COHEN WILL DO THAT.
21:30:06 EXCUSE ME FOR A MOMENT.
21:30:12 [RUSTLING PAPERS]
21:30:18 MR. CHAIRMAN, YOU HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BONUS AGREEMENT
21:30:20 AND I ASK TO CLARIFY THAT.
21:30:25 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I DID.
21:30:26 CLARIFY IT.
21:30:27 I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THE BONUS.
21:30:29 MY POINT WAS THAT THE PETITIONER CANNOT DELEGATE WHERE THAT
21:30:34 MONEY GOES.
21:30:34 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: CORRECT.
21:30:37 >>YVONNE CAPIN: THAT WAS MY POINT BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE SAID
21:30:39 HE SAID THAT PART OF THAT MONEY WOULD COME TO OUR
21:30:42 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:30:43 AND I IMMEDIATELY SAID, NO, HE CANNOT, AND I WANTED TO
21:30:46 CLARIFY THAT THAT IS SOMETHING HE PAYS IT BUT THE
21:30:51 NEIGHBORHOOD, THE CITY DETERMINES WHERE THAT MONEY GOES.
21:30:54 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: AND I RECITED 27-40 OF WHAT WE ARE GOING
21:31:00 TO DO.
21:31:01 AND IN RETURN YOU ACHIEVE THE BONUS DENSITY.
21:31:03 >> MR. COHEN, YOU ASKED THE QUESTION ALSO, HE ASKED THE
21:31:15 QUESTION PRAYER ABOUT MY CONVERSATIONS WITH WEST RIVER.
21:31:19 AND I HAD SPOKEN TO MS. JONES, WHO IS NOT HERE TONIGHT, AND
21:31:23 SAID TO HER THAT I WANTED TO TRY TO WORK COLLABORATIVELY,
21:31:28 WORK WITH THE CITY, WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MONEY,
21:31:34 BECAUSE IT'S SUPPOSED TO GO IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
21:31:38 IMMEDIATE VICINITY, I'M NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S THREE BLOCKS,
21:31:40 FOUR BLOCKS, FIVE BLOCKS, BUT IT IS IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
21:31:43 SO I SAID, LET WORK TOGETHER TO TRY TO GET THAT MONEY IN AS
21:31:48 WELL.
21:31:49 AND THAT WAS MRS. JONES.
21:31:54 SHE WASN'T HERE TONIGHT.
21:32:06 (MICROPHONE FEEDBACK).
21:32:08 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: ALL THE COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION WERE
21:32:13 BASICALLY CONCLUSORY.
21:32:14 I DON'T LIKE THIS.
21:32:16 IT'S NOT A GREAT PROJECT.
21:32:17 THERE'S NOT ENOUGH PLANNING GOING INTO THE PROJECT.
21:32:19 I SUBMIT TO YOU MR. HEY'S FINDINGS ARE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL
21:32:23 EVIDENCE ABOUT THE PLANNING THAT WENT INTO THE PROJECT.
21:32:26 WE ZEROED IN ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXACTLY WHAT THE CMU
21:32:31 35 REQUIRES AND WE MET THE TARGET ON THAT.
21:32:36 TRAFFIC COMMENTS ARE CONCLUSORY.
21:32:39 PARKING ISSUE, WE MEET THE PARKING CODE.
21:32:42 NO WAIVERS AT ALL ON PARKING, WHICH IS REMARKABLE IN THIS
21:32:46 DAY AND AGE.
21:32:46 HOW MANY PARKING WAIVERS DO YOU CONSIDER IN A PARTICULAR
21:32:49 ZONING?
21:32:51 I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION ARE NOT
21:32:55 COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
21:32:58 TO THE CONTRARY, THE COMMENTS AND THE STUDIES BY MRS.
21:33:03 SAMANIEGO AND MR. HEY ARE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
21:33:06 JUSTIFYING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
21:33:07 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.
21:33:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY COMMENTS, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR
21:33:18 QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
21:33:19 NEED A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
21:33:20 >> SO MOVED.
21:33:22 >> SECOND.
21:33:22 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION FROM MR. MANISCALCO.
21:33:26 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
21:33:30 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:33:30 OPPOSED?
21:33:31 WHAT THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
21:33:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WELL, WE HAVE TO GO ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.
21:33:43 MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL READ IT JUST TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS HERE.
21:33:46 ITEM NUMBER 12 FILE REZ 18-52.
21:33:50 MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
21:33:54 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
21:33:56 608 NORTH WILLOW AVENUE, 1332 WEST CASS STREET IN THE CITY
21:33:59 OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION
21:34:01 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL
21:34:04 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND
21:34:07 RESTAURANT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:34:08 >>FRANK REDDICK: GOT A MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
21:34:12 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
21:34:15 GOING ONCE?
21:34:16 DO I HAVE A SECOND?
21:34:18 GOING TWO TIMES.
21:34:21 WE DON'T HAVE A SECOND.
21:34:23 MOTION FAILED.
21:34:30 DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY?
21:34:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF WE CAN, FOR THE PURPOSES
21:34:37 OF DENIAL, OBVIOUSLY THE CODE REQUIRES THAT YOU DO SITE THE
21:34:44 SECTION OF THE CODE THAT IS APPLICABLE.
21:34:48 AND I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WHEN YOU DO SO FOR THE PURPOSES OF
21:34:52 THE RECORD, THAT YOU ELABORATE ON WHAT YOU FIND.
21:34:59 >>FRANK REDDICK: I THINK COUNCIL IS FULLY AWARE OF THAT.
21:35:02 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: MAY WE BE HEARD FOR A MOMENT?
21:35:07 >>FRANK REDDICK: IS IT RELEVANT TO WHAT WE ARE ABOUT TO
21:35:09 VOTE ON?
21:35:10 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: YES, IT IS.
21:35:13 I SUGGEST WE REQUEST A CONTINUANCE FOR FOUR TO FIVE WEEKS TO
21:35:16 MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ONCE AGAIN, SPEAK TO THEM ABOUT
21:35:18 THE PROJECT AND SEE IF WE CAN ANSWER SOME MORE OF THEIR
21:35:21 CONCERNS.
21:35:22 >>FRANK REDDICK: SINCE WE WERE IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING A
21:35:27 VOTE, IF IT DIES BECAUSE OF LACK OF A SECOND, DO WE HAVE TO
21:35:33 ALLOW THE ORDINANCE TO SPEAK AGAIN BASED ON THE REQUEST FOR
21:35:39 CONTINUANCE?
21:35:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FIRST OF ALL, COUNCIL, THE HEARING IS
21:35:43 OFFICIALLY CLOSED.
21:35:44 >>FRANK REDDICK: CORRECT.
21:35:46 WE WOULD HAVE TO OPEN IT UP.
21:35:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND IF YOU WISH TO CONTINUE IT OR YOU WISH
21:35:50 TO EVEN TAKE UP THE QUESTION OF WHETHER TO CONTINUE IT, MY
21:35:54 GUESS WOULD BE TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
21:35:58 IF COUNCIL WISHES TO GET INTO DISCUSSION.
21:36:01 OBVIOUSLY THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
21:36:13 >>FRANK REDDICK: IN THAT CASE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF
21:36:16 MOVING FORWARD WITH A MOTION FOR DENIAL, AND DO WE HAVE A
21:36:18 MOTION?
21:36:20 ANYONE?
21:36:20 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I WILL TAKE A STAB AT IT.
21:36:25 I MAKE A MOTION TO DENY THE APPLICATION FROM PETITIONER
21:36:28 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING.
21:36:30 TWO WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED.
21:36:32 ONE, THAT UNDER SECTION 27-2471-2 SUB C-2, THE REDUCED FRONT
21:36:38 YARD BUILT TO LINE ON NORTH WILLOW STREET IS TOO MUCH OF AN
21:36:44 ACCESS.
21:36:45 THE SECOND WAIVER, SECTION 27-2837-15, THE LOADING THAT
21:36:51 WOULD BE OCCURRING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:36:55 IN ADDITION, I THINK THAT UNDER OUR SECTION 27-136 UNDER
21:37:01 PURPOSE, IT WOULD BE UNDERSTOOD SUB 1, THAT THE PLAN SHOULD
21:37:08 PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND STRUCTURE
21:37:12 CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT TO
21:37:15 OFF-SITE NATURAL ELEMENT SURROUNDING IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOOD
21:37:18 AND CULTURAL RESOURCES.
21:37:20 WE MENTIONED SOME OF THE NATURAL ELEMENTS ON THERE.
21:37:22 IN ADDITION, UNDER A HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CITY-COUNTY
21:37:28 PLANNING COMMISSION UNDER OUR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, IT WOULD
21:37:32 BE UNDER POLICY LAND USE POLICY 1.2.8, IS TO PROMOTE A RANGE
21:37:39 OF USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER.
21:37:42 THESE USES SHALL INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO MIXED
21:37:45 DENSITY HOUSING WITH A VARIETY OF HOUSING OPTIONS, AND LOCAL
21:37:48 SERVING GOODS AND SERVICES, CIVIC USES AND EMPLOYMENT
21:37:52 GENERATORS, SHOWN FROM THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS PRESENTED BY
21:37:56 THE STAFF AND BY THE PETITIONER, THAT THE AMOUNT OF SQUARE
21:38:00 FOOTAGE FOR THOSE LOCAL SERVING GOODS ARE NOT ENOUGH TO
21:38:04 ACTUALLY SERVE THE URBAN VILLAGE.
21:38:09 IN ADDITION, LAND USE POLICY 9.11 SAYS THAT URBAN VILLAGES
21:38:13 CONTAIN MOST OF THE FOLLOWING USES WHICH TYPICALLY MAKE UP
21:38:16 WHAT IS CONSIDERED A TRADITIONAL AND LIVABLE COMMUNITY.
21:38:20 SINGLE AND MULTIFAMILY INCLUDING NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
21:38:23 COMMERCIAL, SCHOOLS, PARKS, AND CENTRAL GATHERING PLACE,
21:38:26 MASS TRANSIT, SAFE WALKABLE PATHWAY THAT CONNECT PEOPLE TO
21:38:29 ALL AREAS OF THE VILLAGE.
21:38:30 I DO NOT THINK THAT THIS PROJECT PROVIDES THOSE
21:38:34 NEIGHBORHOOD-SERVING COMMERCIAL USES.
21:38:37 IN ADDITION, LAND USE OBJECTIVE NUMBER 9.4 TO ACCOMMODATE
21:38:41 THE GREATEST CONCENTRATION OF HOUSING IS DESIRABLE.
21:38:44 EXCUSE ME, INC. DESIRABLE FOR PEAKED ORIENTED AREAS HAVING
21:38:48 CONVENIENT ACCESS TO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION WESTBOUND A MIX
21:38:51 OF ACTIVITY PROVIDING CONVENIENCE ACCESS TO A FULL RANGE OF
21:38:55 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
21:38:57 AGAIN, THIS PROJECT DOES NOT PROVIDE THAT AND PART OF THE
21:39:01 URBAN VILLAGE REQUIREMENT UNDER OUR LAND USE POLICY.
21:39:03 SO FOR THOSE REASONS, I ASK THAT THIS BE DENIED.
21:39:06 >>FRANK REDDICK: GOT A MOTION FROM MR. CIGARS TO DENY THE
21:39:11 APPLICANT.
21:39:13 SECONDED BY MR. MANISCALCO.
21:39:14 ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION?
21:39:15 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
21:39:17 THOSE OPPOSED?
21:39:18 >> NAY.
21:39:19 >>THE CLERK: MOTION FAILED --
21:39:28 >>FRANK REDDICK: THAT PASSED.
21:39:28 >> MOTION PASSED WITH VIERA ABSENT.
21:39:32 COHEN ABSTAINING.
21:39:36 AND MIRANDA VOTING NO.
21:39:37 >>FRANK REDDICK: OKAY.
21:39:39 SO THE LAST ITEM -- ITEM NUMBER 13.
21:39:43 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:39:47 REZ 18-55 IS REZONING REQUEST AT 2305 NORTH 23rd STREET
21:39:52 FROM YC 2 TO YC 9 FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
21:39:59 >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:40:06 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:40:08 WE END TONIGHT IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
21:40:11 MORE SPECIFICALLY THE YBOR CITY URBAN VILLAGE.
21:40:17 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE YBOR CITY LOCAL
21:40:21 HISTORIC DISTRICT.
21:40:24 THERE IS TRANSIT IN THE AREA.
21:40:26 AND THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS .5 MILES TO THE WEST OF THE
21:40:30 SUBJECT SITE.
21:40:31 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN LEVEL D EVACUATION ZONE.
21:40:38 ONTO THE AERIAL.
21:40:40 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:40:45 THIS IS NORTH 23rd STREET THAT DEAD-ENDS INTO THE
21:40:51 INTERSTATE 4 ON-RAMP.
21:40:52 THERE IS A MIXTURE OF MULTIFAMILY DETACHED WITH TWO FAMILY
21:40:58 UNITS.
21:41:00 THIS IS A GAS STATION AT THE CORNER OF 22ND AND THE
21:41:03 EXPRESSWAY.
21:41:04 AND THEN A McDONALD'S.
21:41:08 OFF TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, [RUSTLING PAPERS] THE
21:41:15 SUBJECT SITE, ALL IN THAT BROWN COLOR IS ALL THE RESIDENTIAL
21:41:19 35.
21:41:20 THE DENSITY SLIGHTLY GOES DOWN TO A RESIDENTIAL 20.
21:41:25 AND THEN AS WE GO FURTHER TO THE SOUTH, IT STARTS INCREASING
21:41:29 INTO THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, AND THE URBAN MIXED USE
21:41:34 60.
21:41:35 ALSO TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WHICH IS HERE, THE
21:41:41 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
21:41:45 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATES THAT THE SUBJECT SITE IS
21:41:47 LOCATED IN THE UNIQUE AREA OF CONCERN.
21:41:50 EXEMPTING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE YBOR CITY LOCAL
21:41:53 HISTORIC DISTRICT FROM COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
21:41:57 DUE TO THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE SITE AND ITS LOCATION
21:42:00 WITHIN THE YBOR CITY LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, PLANNING
21:42:03 COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE REZONING IS
21:42:06 APPROPRIATE AND WILL BE COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
21:42:09 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
21:42:12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS ALSO SUPPORTIVE OF THE DESIGN
21:42:16 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND FIND THAT IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH
21:42:19 THE RESIDENTIAL STYLE OF NORTH 23rd STREET AND HAS BEEN
21:42:23 RELATED TO THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:42:26 FURTHER, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT
21:42:29 PROJECTS IN THE URBAN VILLAGES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO A MIXED
21:42:32 USE NATURE OF THE VILLAGE AND TRADITIONAL LIVABLE COMMUNITY.
21:42:37 THE PROPOSED REZONING IS DEVELOPING A VACANT SITE WHICH IS
21:42:40 ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE TO PURSUE AN ECONOMICALLY
21:42:44 SOUND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
21:42:46 REMEMBER THE COMP PLAN DOES RECOGNIZE YBOR AS A UNIQUE AREA,
21:42:52 AND ALSO WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THERE ARE NO
21:42:56 POLICIES REQUIRING PARKING.
21:43:00 SO BASED ON THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FIND THE PROPOSED
21:43:04 REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:43:07 THANK YOU.
21:43:08 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:43:19 AS DAVID SAID, THIS IS YBOR CITY.
21:43:25 AT THE VERY SOUTH SIDE.
21:43:35 I-4 IS RIGHT UP AGAINST IT.
21:43:41 THIS IS 23rd STREET AND IT DEAD-ENDS RIGHT THERE.
21:43:44 AND THEN AN OLD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:43:53 (MICROPHONE FEEDBACK)
21:43:55 IT'S IN THE YC 3.
21:43:59 APPROXIMATE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING YC 9, THE YBOR CITY
21:44:03 VERSION OF A PD.
21:44:11 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN GREEN.
21:44:13 IT'S IN THE RESIDENTIAL PART OF YBOR CITY.
21:44:15 LIKE I SAID, THE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT ALONG 22ND STREET, AND
21:44:21 THEN IT CONTINUE ON THROUGH YBOR CITY ON THE NORTH I-4.
21:44:30 SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
21:44:35 HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REVIEWED THIS WITH THE BARRIO
21:44:39 LATINO COMMISSION IS IN THE AUDIENCE TODAY TO ADDRESS ANY
21:44:42 QUESTIONS YOU EVER ABOUT HISTORIC YBOR CITY OR THE REZONING
21:44:46 STANDARDS ACCORDING TO THE RECORD, HISTORICALLY COMMERCIAL
21:44:51 PROPERTY.
21:44:53 IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT.
21:44:57 YOU CAN SEE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:44:59 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY THROUGH HERE.
21:45:01 NO ALLEYWAY.
21:45:02 I-4.
21:45:11 AND THIS IS ANOTHER VACANT LOT.
21:45:13 AROUND THE CORNER, SOME HOUSES WAITING TO BE REHABILITATED.
21:45:21 BASICALLY, HERE IS THE HOUSE.
21:45:24 THIS IS ALL VACANT LOT. THIS IS ALL VACANT.
21:45:32 DEAD-END STREET THAT DEAD-END AT THE CORRIDOR.
21:45:36 AND THEN ANOTHER VACANT LOT.
21:45:40 YBOR CITY IS JUST BEGINNING TO EMERGE IN THE REDEVELOPMENT.
21:45:47 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING -- IT'S ACTUALLY RELATIVELY
21:45:54 SMALL.
21:45:54 COMPARABLE SIZE BUT IT'S STILL RELATIVELY SMALL.
21:46:01 2800 SQUARE FEET.
21:46:01 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE,
21:46:04 TWO-STORIES, FOR TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 3,350 SQUARE FEET.
21:46:13 AS YOU CAN SEE, THESE ARE THE PROPERTY LINES.
21:46:17 THE BUILDING IS IN VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SETBACKS.
21:46:23 AND HERE ARE THE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS.
21:46:29 FOR THE PROJECT.
21:46:29 AGAIN, SUBJECT IS PROPOSED OFFICES.
21:46:35 2800 SQUARE FEET.
21:46:36 CURRENTLY VACANT.
21:46:37 HISTORICALLY COMMERCIAL USE.
21:46:40 IT'S ON 23rd NORTH OF 12th STREET.
21:46:44 AND THE SETBACKS ARE NOT 5 FEET.
21:46:46 SOUTH 3 FEET.
21:46:48 EAST 3 FEET.
21:46:49 TO THE WEST 1 FOOT.
21:46:51 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 35 FEET.
21:46:54 BASED ON THE -- YBOR CITY HAS SMALLER PARKING REQUIREMENT.
21:47:00 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN STANDARD CODE REQUIRES 3.3
21:47:04 PARKING SPACES PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING.
21:47:07 YBOR CITY BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PARKING REQUIREMENT
21:47:09 IS ONE PARKING SPACE PER ONE THOUSAND SQUARE FEET.
21:47:13 GIVEN THE SIZE OF THIS BUILDING, THERE'S A TOTAL OF THREE
21:47:15 PARKING SPACES.
21:47:17 THEY ARE ASKING TO WAIVE THAT.
21:47:50 (LOST AUDIO MOMENTARILY).
21:47:54 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, RECOMMEND WAIVERS TO GO DOWN TO
21:48:16 ZERO.
21:48:17 AND THE APPLICANT -- JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT WAIVER.
21:48:24 ALSO AS I STATED, THERE'S RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE
21:48:29 PROPERTY TO THE EAST AS WELL AS THE SOUTH.
21:48:32 THE CODE REQUIRES LANDSCAPE BUFFERS WITH A WALL OR FENCE.
21:48:36 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 3-FOOT BUFFER WITH A FENCE.
21:48:40 THE FENCE IS FINE BECAUSE IT IN THE YBOR CITY HISTORIC
21:48:44 DISTRICT AND THAT'S COMPLIANT WITH THEIR STANDARD.
21:48:46 BUT AGAIN 15 FEET HERE, ASKING TO GO TOWN TO 3.
21:48:51 SO THAT'S THE SUBJECT OF ANOTHER WAIVER.
21:48:55 THE FINAL WAIVER THAT THEY ARE ASKING AGAIN, BASICALLY
21:48:58 BECAUSE WELL OVER 90% OF THE LOT WITH BUILDING, AND THEY ARE
21:49:07 ASKING A WAIVER TO ALLOW FOR PAYMENT INTO THE TREE TRUST
21:49:11 FUND BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SPACE TO PLANT TREES
21:49:18 ON-SITE.
21:49:20 AGAIN, AS I STATED, STAFF DID FIND THIS INCONSISTENT,
21:49:24 BECAUSE OF PARKING WAIVER DOWN TO ZERO.
21:49:30 THEN STAFF CAN ONLY THINK OF ONE OTHER INSTANCE WHERE YOU
21:49:33 HAD A DEVELOPMENT DOWN TO ZERO PARKING SPACES THAT WAS FOR
21:49:37 AN EXISTING HOUSE IN TAMPA HEIGHTS.
21:49:41 TRANSPORTATION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT BOTH FOUND THAT
21:49:43 INCONSISTENT AS WELL.
21:49:48 IF CITY COUNCIL CHOOSES TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION, THERE
21:49:51 ARE CHANGES THAT STAFF REQUIRES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
21:49:54 READING.
21:49:55 BASICALLY JUST KIND OF CLEANING UP THE SITE PLAN AS FAR AS
21:49:58 LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:49:59 NATURAL RESOURCES, THE TREE TABLE NEEDS SOME MODIFICATIONS.
21:50:04 AND THAT'S BASICALLY IT.
21:50:08 FINDING OF INCONSISTENCIES IS BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING
21:50:12 WAIVER, REDUCTION FROM 15 FEET TO 3, AND THE PARKING
21:50:15 REDUCTION FROM 3 TO ZERO.
21:50:18 DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT THIS TIME?
21:50:19 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
21:50:22 ALL RIGHT.
21:50:24 APPLICANT?
21:50:24 >> GOOD EVENING.
21:50:46 MY NAME IS LEO. I'M WITH BERYL ENGINEERING.
21:50:51 THE PRESENTATION IS DESIGNED TO HELP YOU SEE WHY THIS
21:50:54 REQUEST FOR REZONING WOULD BE A WISE DECISION.
21:50:59 IN THE PRESENTATION, I AM GOING TO TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT OUR
21:51:03 COMPANY AND WHY WE WANT TO RELOCATE TO LOCATION.
21:51:06 THE YBOR CITY VISION PLAN WHICH WAS A DOCUMENT APPROVED FOR
21:51:10 CRA 2 WHICH IS THE ZONE THAT WE WANT TO PUT THIS PROPERTY
21:51:15 ON.
21:51:16 SITE PHOTOS SHOWING THE UNIQUE DIFFICULTIES OF THE LOT, AREA
21:51:19 PHOTOS, LAND HISTORY.
21:51:24 WE WILL DISCUSS THE PARKING AND WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT
21:51:26 THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN AND ITS EVOLUTION INTO WHEN WE MET
21:51:30 ON-SITE OVER THE COURSE OF A MONTH TO COME UP WITH AN YBOR
21:51:34 FRIENDLY LOOKING DESIGN.
21:51:36 A RECAP OF THE BARRIO LATINO MEETING AND WE HAD 118 SUPPORT
21:51:43 LETTERS AND STAFF THAT ARE PRESENT TODAY.
21:51:47 I AM ONE OF THE CO-FINDERS OF BERYL ENGINEERING.
21:51:56 I AM A CERTIFIED MASTER INSPECTOR.
21:51:58 I TOOK THE STATE EVALUATIONS PROPERTIES.
21:52:02 I AM A RADIO PERSONALITY.
21:52:03 I HAVE A SATURDAY MORNING RADIO SHOW ON 1010 AM.
21:52:07 I HAVE TEN YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND WE TAKE ACCESS AND HELP
21:52:14 TO REHABILITATE THEM REGARDLESS TO MAKE THEM LIVABLE
21:52:18 PROPERTIES FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BUYING.
21:52:22 OUR COMPANY, WE ARE AN INSPECTION AND ENGINEERING COMPANY.
21:52:25 MOST OF OUR STAFF WORKS IN THE FIELD OR WORK FROM HOME.
21:52:28 WE DO HAVE SOME OFFICE STAFF.
21:52:29 BUT WE DO PREPURCHASE HOME INSPECTIONS, COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
21:52:38 HELP ACQUIRE PERMITS, DO CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, AND A
21:52:43 THIRD PARTY PROVIDER AS WELL.
21:52:44 JUST WANTED TO TOUCH ON SOME OF THE --
21:52:49 SO OF THE AWARD, WE HAVE A 2016 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SMALL
21:52:52 BUSINESS OF THE YEAR.
21:52:53 WE HAVE THE 2017 AND 2018 MEDIUM BUSINESS FINALIST FOR THE
21:52:58 SAME CATEGORY.
21:52:59 WE ARE WE HAVE THE AWARD FOR THE 2016, 17, 18 FOR
21:53:03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
21:53:04 HOME ADVISER PREFERRED SERVICE PROVIDERS, AND LEED SERVICE
21:53:08 PROVIDERS 2017-18, AND WE ARE ALSO A SMALL BUSINESS LOCAL
21:53:13 ENTITY REGISTERED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
21:53:14 ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE WANT TO RELOCATE TO YBOR CITY,
21:53:18 EVER SINCE MOVING TO TAMPA I HAVE LIVED IN YBOR CITY.
21:53:21 I LOVE THE CITY.
21:53:22 I LOVE THE MIXED USE AND THE FEEL OF THE CITY.
21:53:25 I WANT TO CONTRIBUTE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY BY PUTTING
21:53:27 DEVELOPMENT IN A RELATIVELY UNDEVELOPED PLACE.
21:53:34 I WILL SHOW PICTURES SHORTLY.
21:53:36 THERE'S NOTHING OUT THERE AND I WANT TO HELP.
21:53:39 CONTINUING THAT, I WANT TO HELP SPUR GROWTH BY TAKING THE
21:53:42 RISK BY PUTTING AN OFFICE BUILDING THERE.
21:53:51 WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE THAT HANDLE THE PHONES AND SCHEDULING.
21:53:54 I HAVE THREE DESIGNERS THAT WORK IN THE OFFICE.
21:53:56 AND THE OTHER FIVE PEOPLE ALL WORK IN THE FIELD.
21:53:58 THEY WORK FROM HOME.
21:54:00 AND THEY PERFORM INSPECTIONS ALL AROUND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
21:54:04 AND EAST TAMPA.
21:54:10 THIS WAS A JOINT DOCUMENT CREATED BY THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
21:54:13 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF TAMPA.
21:54:16 WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT HOW OUR PROJECT FITS INTO THE
21:54:19 VISION PLAN.
21:54:20 CRA 2 HAS SEVERAL DEFINITIONS BUT THE PRIMARY ONE IS EAST OF
21:54:25 21 AND 22ND, YOU WOULD MAKE A LEFT IN STEADY STEAD OF A
21:54:31 RIGHT, CRA 1.
21:54:33 THE CITY CORE, ENHANCE WALKABILITY, INVESTMENT, IMPROVED
21:54:43 CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY AND THE REGION.
21:54:45 THESE STRATEGIES IN THAT DOCUMENT, PRESERVATION QUALITY OF
21:54:48 DEVELOPMENT WITH A FOCUS ON STABILIZATION, REHABILITATION,
21:54:51 AND APPROPRIATE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT.
21:54:54 TALK ABOUT LIVABILITY.
21:54:56 MAKING YBOR AN ATTRACTIVE PLACE TO LIVE AND DO BUSINESS AND
21:54:59 TO LIMIT THE EXPANSION OF PARKING LOT.
21:55:02 WITH REGARDS TO PARKING IN THIS VISION PLAN, THERE'S STRICT
21:55:07 LIMITS OF A LOCATION OF SURFACE PARKING AREAS SUCH AS
21:55:11 ESTABLISHED PARKING IN A PRIMARY LAND USE IS NOT APPLICABLE.
21:55:15 AND REGARDLESS OF ACCESS, PARKING, MAKING A PARKING SPACE IN
21:55:23 FRONT OF THE APARTMENT.
21:55:24 LAND USE.
21:55:25 HISTORICALLY, YBOR CITY HAS HAD A LONG HISTORY OF MIXED USE
21:55:29 DEVELOPMENT, BACK OVER 100 YEARS.
21:55:32 SETBACKS ARE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE HOUSING AROUND THEM.
21:55:35 AND IT WOULDN'T BE PROPER TO PUT A 6-FOOT HIGH MASONRY FENCE
21:55:43 AROUND THE PROPERTY SO WE ARE GOING TO GO WITH THE APPROACH
21:55:47 OF A WOOD FENCE.
21:55:50 IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT.
21:55:51 THE VISION DEVELOPMENT, TO ASK FOR BUILD ZONING STANDARDS,
21:55:58 WE STRONGLY BELIEVE IN COMPATIBLE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT.
21:56:01 LAKE I SAID THE SITE IS UNIQUE AND WE WANT TO ACTUALLY BE
21:56:04 ABLE TO GIVE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY.
21:56:08 THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES.
21:56:11 ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE HISTORIC
21:56:13 URBAN FORM.
21:56:17 WE MET WITH STAFF TO COME UP WITH OUR ELEVATION.
21:56:19 LAND USE, DIVERSITY AND INTEGRATION, TARGETED FOR GROWTH.
21:56:26 ENGINEERING IS OFTEN THOUGHT PART OF AN ARTISTIC ENTER
21:56:31 APPLIES, AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHOULD BE CAREFULLY DIRECTED
21:56:34 AND CONTROLLED, WITH MAKING IT PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY.
21:56:39 BE AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP SOME OF THE PHOTOS
21:56:42 THAT WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT.
21:56:44 BASICALLY, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE TOP FOUR PHOTOS, THERE IS
21:56:47 NOTHING AROUND.
21:56:48 IF YOU LOOK FROM THE LOT YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE THE GAS
21:56:51 STATION, THE MCDONALD, AND THE TIRE SHOP, THE THREE
21:56:55 NEIGHBORS TO THE WEST THAT YOU CAN SEE FROM THE LOT.
21:56:57 THERE IS ONE HOUSE TO THE SOUTH.
21:57:00 THERE IS A CULVERT BLOCKING THE NORTH ALLEYWAY.
21:57:08 ASKED FLORIDA IF THEY WOULD VACATE THAT AND THEY REFUSED
21:57:11 THAT
21:57:14 THERE'S ACTUALLY A CULVERT BLOCKING THE ALLEY.
21:57:18 THE DARK GRAY INDICATES STRUCTURES.
21:57:21 AND THE DARK GRAY INDICATES A LOT.
21:57:24 YOU CAN SEE MOST OF THIS AREA UNFORTUNATELY, THE VIEW TO I-4
21:57:27 HAS REMIND UNDEVELOPED EVER SINCE I-4 WAS PLACED THERE.
21:57:31 IT VERY UNFORTUNATE.
21:57:33 THE GAS STATION.
21:57:35 FIRE STATION.
21:57:36 McDONALD'S.
21:57:37 AND THEN THERE IS ONE HOUSE.
21:57:40 HISTORICALLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE CENTER, THAT'S PROPERTY
21:57:45 BACK IN THE 1930s.
21:57:47 IT WAS A TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL STORE.
21:57:49 THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN A STORE IN THE PA PAST.
21:57:57 THIS SHOWS THE RECORD FROM 1929, 30, 31, 32.
21:58:02 IN THE 50s IT BECAME A DWELLING.
21:58:04 WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORIC USE AND HISTORIC
21:58:06 FOOTPRINT.
21:58:07 AND IT'S JUST SHOWING YOU THIS IS WHAT IT WAS IN THE 50s.
21:58:10 AT SOME POINT IN THE PAST IT BECAME A VACANT LOT.
21:58:13 ALL THAT'S OUT THERE IS A TEMPORARY.
21:58:19 TO ADDRESS THE PARKING CONCERNS.
21:58:22 IN ORDER TO PUT PARKING ON THIS SITE, ONE PARKING SPACE IS
21:58:24 SHOWN HERE WHICH MAKES THE BUILDING 7-FOOT WIDE.
21:58:26 MAKES THIS NOT READABLE.
21:58:31 WE DID TALK ABOUT HAVING A PARKING SPATES IN THE FRONT.
21:58:36 NO PARKING IN THE FRONT.
21:58:40 WITH HAVING A ONE SPOT ON THE SITE, THE BUILDING IS 7 FEET
21:58:43 WADE, AND TWO STORIES WOULD BE A THOUSAND SQUARE FEET WHICH
21:58:47 WOULD MAKE IT UNUSABLE.
21:58:48 INSTEAD, ONE OTHER THING, TRANSPORTATION HAS RECENTLY
21:58:57 APPROVED THIS COUNCIL HAS WAIVED DOWN TO ZERO FOR SIMILAR
21:59:02 HARDSHIPS OF A PROPERTY NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE PARKING.
21:59:05 WE BELIEVE THERE IS AMPLE PARKING AROUND THE SITE.
21:59:09 AND THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THAT.
21:59:11 FROM THE SOUTH OF THE LOON THERE IS A CITY PARKING LOT 650
21:59:15 FEET AWAY.
21:59:16 THERE IS STREET PARKING A THOUSAND FEET AWAY AND ANOTHER
21:59:19 CITY AREA ABOUT 150 FEET AWAY.
21:59:21 SO YBOR CITY, THERE ARE PARKING LOTS.
21:59:24 WE ARE JUST ASKING TO USE THE PARKING LOT.
21:59:26 WE ARE ASKING TO KEEP OUR CARS OUTSIDE OF CRA 2.
21:59:30 HAVE OUR PEOPLE PARK IN CRA 1.
21:59:35 (NO ENCODER)
21:59:45 (LOST AUDIO).
21:59:56 AMPLE PARKING IN YBOR CITY DURING THE DAY.
22:00:09 I WILL TALK A LITTLE ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
22:00:11 THIS IS OUR FIRST SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY WITH A SINGLE STORY
22:00:17 BUILDING.
22:00:17 WE HAD HANDICAPPED IN THE FRONT.
22:00:19 A LITTLE CUT-OUT OF A CONFERENCE ROOM.
22:00:21 THE BUILDING IS GOING TO HAVE A MODERN HIP PITCH ROOF.
22:00:27 AND WE MET WITH STAFF AND QUICKLY SHOT THAT DOWN.
22:00:30 WANTED TO SEE SOMETHING MORE HISTORIC.
22:00:32 WE FOCUSED ON THE BUILDING ON 5th AVENUE.
22:00:36 VERY NICE BUILDING.
22:00:37 IT'S HISTORIC LOOKING.
22:00:38 TWO STORIES AND SLIM.
22:00:41 AFTER MEETING ON-SITE, THE MET WITH OTHER CITY STAFF AND OUR
22:00:49 OWN STAFF, WE REALLY FELL IN LOVE WITH THE LOOK OF THIS
22:00:51 BUILDING AND ADVISED THAT THAT WOULD BE OUR LOOK FOR THIS
22:00:54 BUILDING AND WOULD ALSO BLEND IN WITH THE OTHER RESIDENTS.
22:00:58 WE WOULD PUT THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING 16 INCHES, THE
22:01:04 BUILDING ELEVATED COMPLETELY MIRRORING FOR THE HISTORIC
22:01:07 FEEL.
22:01:09 AND THAT BRINGS US TO THE SITE PLAN WHICH MARY HAS SHOWN.
22:01:14 I DO HAVE LARGER VERSIONS.
22:01:21 WE HAVE LARGER VERSIONS OF THAT TO SHOW YOU IN CASE YOU ARE
22:01:24 INTERESTED.
22:01:29 TO RECAP THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION MEETING, IT WAS A
22:01:32 SPLIT DECISION, FOUR AGAINST, THREE FOUR.
22:01:34 THE SAD PART ABOUT THAT, THEY HAD TWO HOT TOPICS INTO TWO
22:01:41 SEPARATE MOTIONS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE PASSED.
22:01:43 IT WAS REALLY SPLIT 3 TO 4 ON PARKING AND 3 TO 4 ON THE LOOK
22:01:47 OF THE BUILDING.
22:01:47 AND THERE WAS A SWING MEMBER.
22:01:54 AND THEY LUMPED THE TWO MOTIONS TOGETHER.
22:02:01 ULTIMATELY, WE WERE IN A DIFFICULT SITUATION WHERE PEOPLE
22:02:04 HAVE BEEN IN FAVOR OF THIS BUT IN A ONE -- AND REALLY GIVING
22:02:12 A CLEAR DEFINITION ON WHAT WOULD BE APPROVED.
22:02:15 WE REALLY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS BUILDING.
22:02:17 WE REALLY WOULD LIKE IT IN YBOR CITY.
22:02:19 BUT WE NEED CLEAR DEFINITION.
22:02:23 IF THIS ISN'T SYSTEM, WHICH WE BELIEVE IT IS, IF THERE IS
22:02:26 SOMETHING THAT THIS CITY COUNCIL WOULD APPROVE AND THAT'S
22:02:28 WHAT WE LIKE TO FIX BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IF THIS
22:02:33 COUNCIL DECIDED TO CHANGE.
22:02:34 IT WAS OUR GOAL TO HAVE THIS BUILDING APPROVED, TO HAVE THIS
22:02:37 BUILDING, TO CONTRIBUTE TO YBOR AND KEEP IT ON AN UPSPRING.
22:02:42 LASTLY, I WOULD LIKE TO FINISH, WE HAVE 118 LETTERS OF
22:02:47 SUPPORT THAT WERE E-MAILED INTO CITY COUNCIL DURING THE
22:02:50 THREE-WEEK PERIOD.
22:02:51 THEY ARE FROM LOCAL BUSINESSES, FROM LOCAL RESIDENTS.
22:02:55 ALSO FROM YBOR CIVIC ASSOCIATION WHO IS HERE IN ATTENDANCE.
22:03:00 THE YBOR CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
22:03:02 WE HAVE THE YCDC.
22:03:03 SO WE HAVE SUPPORT FROM THE LOCAL PEOPLE APPROXIMATE, EVEN
22:03:07 THOUGH I BELIEVE WITH ANYTHING, THERE ARE ALWAYS PEOPLE IN
22:03:10 THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO WILL OBJECT AND YOU WILL PROBABLY HEAR
22:03:12 FROM THEM SHORTLY.
22:03:13 THAT BEING SAID I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
22:03:15 I KNOW IT'S GETTING REALLY LATE.
22:03:18 I KIND OF WENT OVER.
22:03:19 I DON'T WANT TO WASTE ANY TIME.
22:03:22 I'M VERY HAPPY TO PRESENT THIS AND VERY EXCITED.
22:03:24 OUR STAFF IS VERY EXCITED TO HAVE A BUILDING FOR OUR
22:03:28 OPERATIONS.
22:03:29 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
22:03:31 >>YVONNE CAPIN: ANYTHING THAT'S NOT A BAR IN YBOR SOUND
22:03:36 GOOD TO ME.
22:03:37 >>FRANK REDDICK: ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON
22:03:43 ITEM NUMBER 13?
22:03:45 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 13?
22:03:49 NOW IS YOUR TIME.
22:03:50 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
22:04:14 >> FRAN COSTANTINO.
22:04:18 I HAVE BEEN A PROPERTY OWNER IN EAST YBOR.
22:04:20 I WAS INDUSTRIAL, LIKE MR. MIRANDA SAID, YBOR IS NOT THE
22:04:25 SAME BUT WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN EXTENDING THE HISTORIC
22:04:27 BOUNDARIES FROM THE COLUMBIA RESTAURANT TO 28th STREET
22:04:29 BECAUSE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT TAMPA AT THE TIME WHEN I
22:04:32 MOVED THERE WAS FOR EVERYTHING TO BE EAST OF 22ND BE
22:04:38 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL.
22:04:39 IT TOOK ME THREE YEARS TO GO BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
22:04:44 AND TWICE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL, AND MARY AND ROSE FERLITA
22:04:49 SAID WHAT THE HECK TOOK YOU SO LONG?
22:04:51 BUT THE REASON -- AND I PUT IN BLUE ON THE BOTTOM.
22:04:55 THE REASON IT IN BLUE IS THAT IS THE CURRENT YC ZONING
22:04:59 BECAUSE THE RESIDENTIAL EAST OF 22ND STREET.
22:05:03 THIS IS SUCH A MONSTER OF A HOUSE.
22:05:05 IT ONLY TAKES 2500 SQUARE FEET TO PUT A LITTLE CASITA ON
22:05:11 2500 SQUARE FEET.
22:05:12 HE WANT TO PUT A TWO-STORY, 3,000-PLUS SQUARE FEET, NO
22:05:18 PARKING, TWO WAIVERS TO BE UP 3 FEET WITHIN THE OWNER
22:05:24 OCCUPIED PROPERTY LINE.
22:05:26 I MEAN, THIS IS ABSURD.
22:05:28 WHEN HE CAME IN TO THE BARRIO I WAS SHOCKED THAT IT VOTED
22:05:31 THE WAY IT DID. HE SAID 3 TO 4.
22:05:34 IT WAS ACTUALLY 4 TO 3.
22:05:36 4 AGAINST ON BOTH MOTIONS.
22:05:38 IT GOES THROUGH 100 LETTERS, OR THEY STOPPED AT 100 LETTERS.
22:05:44 IT WAS A FORM LETTER ON HIS LETTERHEAD.
22:05:47 AND I WOULD BE SO BOLD THAT PEOPLE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT
22:05:51 THEY WERE SIGNING.
22:05:51 ONE WAS FROM A BAR FROM THE CASTLE.
22:05:54 THERE WERE NAMES THAT CAME UP THAT WERE -- TO BE SUPPORTIVE.
22:06:03 SO I AM ASKING FOR CONSIDERATION TO KEEP EAST OF 22ND
22:06:07 STRICTLY RESIDENTIAL.
22:06:09 THIS IS SUCH A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT.
22:06:11 WE HAVE SO MANY VACANT LOTS THERE.
22:06:14 THE OWNER LIVES ON 10th STREET ON THE OTHER SIDE.
22:06:17 AND TO HAVE A TWO-STORY HOUSE THAT HE SHOWED YOU IS ON THE
22:06:20 WEST SIDE OF 22ND STREET.
22:06:22 NOT ON THE EAST SIDE.
22:06:23 THERE'S NOTHING ON THE EAST SIDE COMPARABLE TO WHAT HE WANT
22:06:26 TO PUT ON A 2800 SQUARE FOOT LOT, 35 BY 80, NO PARKING, AND
22:06:33 BE WITH THE EMPLOYEES ON THERE, NO PARKING, REDUCING TWO
22:06:39 BUFFERS FROM 50 FEET DOWN TO BE THREE, AND ONE OF THE
22:06:43 NEIGHBORS HAS A LETTER FROM THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR THAT
22:06:46 COULDN'T MAKE IT TONIGHT, THAT IS TOTALLY AGAINST THIS
22:06:49 PROJECT BEING UP AGAINST HIM.
22:06:53 SO I PLEAD WITH YOU, AND PLEASE, THIS IS A POSTER CHILD TO
22:06:58 BEGIN.
22:06:58 WE WANT TO SEANED CLEAR MESSAGE TO ALL THOSE VACANT LOTS
22:07:01 THAT COMMERCIAL, NEW CONSTRUCTION, IS NOT WELCOME ON THE
22:07:05 EAST SIDE IN EAST YBOR.
22:07:08 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:07:08 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I HAVE A QUESTION.
22:07:11 IT'S NOT WELCOME BUT IS IT PART OF THE PLAN NOT TO HAVE
22:07:18 RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL IN EAST YBOR?
22:07:22 IS IT DICTATED THAT IT IS HOUSES ONLY?
22:07:25 >>DAVID HEY: EVEN THOUGH IT IS DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL 35
22:07:31 THE CRITERIA, THERE'S ACTUALLY AN EXEMPTION IN THE COMP
22:07:35 PLAN.
22:07:35 IT'S ON PAGE 118.
22:07:37 IT SAYS THE YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICT IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
22:07:40 CRITERIA LISTED HEREIN AS IT IS A UNIQUE AREA OF CONCERN.
22:07:45 THERE ARE PROVISIONS IN THE ZONING CODE SPECIFIC TO YBOR
22:07:48 CITY THAT ADDRESS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
22:07:50 OFFICE USES.
22:07:52 IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LAND USE CATEGORY GIVES A
22:07:59 DIFFERENT MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR RESIDENTIAL 35 IN THE
22:08:03 CITY AS A WHOLE.
22:08:04 THE MAXIMUM IS .6 F.A.R. IN YBOR CITY THE REZ 35 IS 2.0
22:08:11 F.A.R.
22:08:11 >>YVONNE CAPIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:08:14 >>FRANK REDDICK: NEXT SPEAKER.
22:08:15 >> JAMES WILSON.
22:08:29 I LIVE CATTY-CORNER TO THIS PROJECT.
22:08:33 AND I OPPOSE IT.
22:08:35 AND I HAVE A LETTER FROM MY NEIGHBOR RICK EASILY AND I AM
22:08:41 GOING TO READ IT REAL QUICKLY.
22:08:44 PROPOSED PLANS FOR THE BERYL ENGINEERING PROJECT WERE SENT
22:08:51 TO ME BY JAMES WILSON.
22:08:52 THIS IS FROM RICH COOPER, 23103 NORTH 23rd STREET.
22:09:00 AS THE OWNER OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY I STRONGLY OBJECT TO
22:09:02 THE ZONING DESIGNATION AND BUILDING IN PARTICULAR.
22:09:05 I SEE IN A PRESSING NEED TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY AWAY FROM
22:09:08 RESIDENTIAL.
22:09:09 THERE'S PLENTY OF VACANT OFFICE SPACE ALREADY AVAILABLE IN
22:09:12 YBOR CITY, EAST YBOR, ABOVE 7th AVENUE HAS BEEN
22:09:16 RESIDENTIAL WITHOUT THE MIXED USE CATEGORY IN OTHER AREAS OF
22:09:19 YBOR.
22:09:20 IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS HISTORICAL DESIGNATION IS
22:09:24 TO PROTECT US FROM THIS VERY THING.
22:09:27 SO WE END UP LIVING NEXT DOOR TO BUSINESSES AND FACTORIES.
22:09:31 EVEN IF THE PROPERTY WERE REZONED TO ALLOW FOR BUSINESSES,
22:09:34 THIS PROPERTY IS OUT OF SCALE FOR THE CHARACTER OF THE
22:09:38 NEIGHBORHOOD WHILE SEEKING TO BUILD MORE THAN THREE TIMES
22:09:41 THE SIZE OF OUR HOME, AND STANDING HOMES AROUND, 1,000
22:09:46 SQUARE FEET.
22:09:46 THE PROPOSED BUILDING HAS WINDOWS WOULD BE LOCATED JUST A
22:09:50 FEW FEET AND LOOKING DIRECTLY INTO OUR BEDROOMS.
22:09:53 WE WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO OPEN OUR CURTAINS AGAIN WITHOUT
22:09:57 SOME WORKER STARING IN.
22:09:59 THE PROPOSED PLAN HAS NO LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE
22:10:03 BUSINESS AND THE RESIDENCE PROPERTY.
22:10:05 THERE IS NO PROPOSAL -- FOR THIS LOT.
22:10:08 AN OFFICE OF THIS SIZE COULD HAVE 20 OR MORE EMPLOYEES PLUS
22:10:12 CLIENTS.
22:10:14 THERE IS ALMOST NO TRAFFIC AT THIS END OF 23rd.
22:10:17 IT IS A DEAD-END STREET.
22:10:18 INCREASED TRAFFIC WOULD DIMINISH OUR QUALITY OF LIFE.
22:10:21 THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY HAS MADE NO ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ME
22:10:24 REGARDING THE PLANS OR TO MITIGATE ANY CONCERN THAT WE HAVE.
22:10:29 I HAVE HOWEVER HAD A PREVIOUS DISCUSSION WITH SOMEONE HIRED
22:10:33 TO MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPE.
22:10:34 I BELIEVE HIS NAME IS TONY.
22:10:36 HE STATED THAT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WAS A SPECULATOR
22:10:39 WHO APPROACHED THIS PROPERTY ONLINE.
22:10:44 THE OWNER HAS FAILED TO UNDERSTAND BOTH THE BENEFIT AND
22:10:46 BURDENS OF LIVING IN A NATIONAL LANDMARK DISTRICT.
22:11:01 THERE IS A CULVERT.
22:11:04 THE PROPERTY IN THE BACK, I PERSONALLY DON'T THINK IT'S
22:11:07 COMPATIBLE.
22:11:08 I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN A RESIDENTIAL
22:11:11 AREA.
22:11:15 AND I HAVE LIVED THERE TEN YEARS, AND I DO RESTORATION,
22:11:24 YBORHOUSE.COM.
22:11:25 I HAVE DONE THAT FOR TEN YEARS.
22:11:27 THAT'S MY WORK.
22:11:27 I DO HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN YBOR.
22:11:30 AND I AM A NEIGHBOR OF FRAN'S.
22:11:33 JOSE, TOO. HE'S A GOOD NEIGHBOR.
22:11:35 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
22:11:36 NEXT SPEAKER.
22:11:45 (LOST AUDIO MOMENTARILY -- NO ENCODER).
22:12:11 >> BRAND NEW HOUSES, DEVELOPMENT IN THIS SECTION OF THE
22:12:15 NEIGHBORHOOD, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT MOVING INTO THESE AREAS
22:12:21 MEANS FOR ME AND MY FAMILY.
22:12:23 BUT I LIVED IN YBOR CITY, I WORKED IN YBOR CITY FOR MANY
22:12:28 YEARS, AND I LIVED IN THE EAST AREA.
22:12:35 AND THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT, I KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, IT WAS
22:12:44 VERY UNIQUE.
22:12:46 I FORTUNATELY NEVER THOUGHT ANYBODY WOULD BE CRAZY ENOUGH TO
22:12:51 PUT ANYTHING IN THAT CORNER.
22:13:22 YOU SAW THE PICTURE.
22:13:24 YOU HAVE A HIGHWAY RIGHT NEXT DOOR.
22:13:29 I LIVE A BLOCK AND A HALF AWAY FROM IT.
22:13:39 I SPEAK ON BEHALF OF A LOT OF MY NEIGHBORS.
22:13:49 I AM GETTING RELATIONSHIPS WITH ALL THE NEIGHBORS, PEOPLE
22:13:51 THAT LIVED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR 100 YEARS, FOR 50 YEARS,
22:13:55 INFORM 40 YEARS, GREW UP IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THEY KNOW
22:13:58 WHAT THEY WANT.
22:13:59 AND IT'S A COMMUNITY EFFORT.
22:14:05 AND WE HAVE TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:14:11 [BELL SOUNDS]
22:14:15 AND NO SINGLE DEVELOPMENT.
22:14:18 THERE'S TWO HOUSES RELOCATED.
22:14:24 THEY WERE BOARDED UP FOR MORE THAN TEN YEARS.
22:14:26 AND THERE ARE EIGHT COMPANIES, LOCAL COMPANIES, BESIDES THE
22:14:32 REDEVELOPERS.
22:14:32 SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE NEED.
22:14:37 THANK YOU.
22:14:37 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I GREW UP IN YBOR CITY AND STARTED FIRST
22:14:42 GRADE VM YBOR ELEMENTARY.
22:14:44 YBOR WAS MIXED USE.
22:14:48 YOU HAD GROCERY STORES, AND THE OWNERS LIVED UPSTAIRS.
22:14:52 ALL OVER THE PLACE.
22:14:54 YOU HAD RETAIL ALL OVER THE PLACE.
22:14:56 AND RESIDENTIAL MIXED IN.
22:14:59 THE CORRIDOR IS LIKE 15th AVENUE WAS MORE COMMERCIAL.
22:15:04 BUT DOWN THE BLOCK FROM MY HOUSE, THERE WAS A GROCER.
22:15:15 AND THAT'S WHAT YBOR WAS.
22:15:16 IT WAS VERY MIXED USE.
22:15:18 AND PEOPLE LIVED ABOVE THEIR STORES.
22:15:21 SO I DON'T SEE -- I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE DESIGN, BUT I DON'T
22:15:26 SEE THE CONCEPT OF HAVING AN OFFICE BUILDING OR PROFESSIONAL
22:15:35 OFFICE IN THIS AREA.
22:15:41 AS A MATTER OF FACT, IT COULD BE VERY HELPFUL TO BRINGING
22:15:44 PEOPLE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND SEE MORE PEOPLE
22:15:46 CIRCULATING.
22:15:48 BUT I DO LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF YBOR.
22:15:51 AND THE HISTORY OF YBOR WAS MIXED USE EVERYWHERE.
22:15:55 SO THAT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT THE TRADITION WAS.
22:16:01 I DON'T SEE ANY -- THE DOWN SIDE.
22:16:04 BUT MAYBE MY COLLEAGUES WILL POINT IT OUT TO YOU.
22:16:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU WANT ME TO SPEAK, I WILL.
22:16:18 LIKE MRS. CAPIN SAID, BORN AND RAISED IN YBOR CITY, AND I
22:16:21 DIDN'T HAVE THE HONOR OF GOING TO -- I WENT TO A BETTER ONE
22:16:27 CALLED OX GROVE. TWO RIVALS.
22:16:33 AS I WAS THINKING I THOUGHT WHY DO THEY WANT ZERO PARKING
22:16:36 FROM THREE TO ZERO?
22:16:38 I REALLY DON'T LIKE THAT.
22:16:39 THEN I STARTED THINKING ABOUT MY CHILDHOOD.
22:16:48 HOW MANY PARKING SPACES THEY HAD?
22:16:51 YOU KNOW HOW MANY EMPLOYEES THEY HAD?
22:16:53 THEY HAD HUNDREDS OF EMPLOYEES.
22:16:56 YOU KNOW HOW MANY PARKING SPACES?
22:16:58 MAYBE TEN.
22:17:04 GO BACK TO THE FACTORY.
22:17:07 I THINK -- NOT AN APARTMENT BUILDING.
22:17:12 SPEAKING ABOUT CHANGING THAT.
22:17:20 IT WAS ALL STREET PARKING.
22:17:22 SO I SORT OF GIVE YOU MY PAST QUICKLY.
22:17:28 STARTED MEMORIZING HOW MANY PEOPLE WALKED.
22:17:30 AND 800 FEET, 1200 FEET, 15 BLOCKS, TWO MILES TO WORK AND
22:17:36 TWO MILES BACK.
22:17:38 AT THAT TIME APPROXIMATE FEW HAD CARS.
22:17:41 BUFF THINGS CHANGE.
22:17:42 AND AT FIRST I SAID, I DON'T LIKE THE PROJECT.
22:17:49 I'M THINKING OF A REDUCTION FROM THREE TO ZERO.
22:17:53 THEN I UNDERSTOOD FROM MY PAST WHY IT WAS SUCCESSFUL.
22:17:56 PEOPLE WALKED, PEOPLE TALKED TO EACH OTHER, AND THEY HAD A
22:18:02 FRONT PORCH.
22:18:03 HOUSES ARE BUILT NOW WITHOUT NO PORCHES.
22:18:06 YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO YOUR NEIGHBOR IS.
22:18:08 OR AIR CONDITIONING COMING ON AND OFF.
22:18:12 LIFE HAS CHANGED AND I DON'T THINK IT'S FOR THE BETTER.
22:18:15 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:18:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: DO YOU WISH TO HAVE ANY LAST COMMENTS?
22:18:19 >> I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THE CONCERNS FROM THE
22:18:37 PEOPLE BEHIND ME.
22:18:39 FIRST, THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH, MR. COOPER, HE WAS
22:18:42 PRESENT AT OUR MEETING BACK IN FEBRUARY WHEN WE STARTED THE
22:18:46 PROCESS WITH RON VILLA ON SIGHT.
22:18:49 I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED THAT HE'S NOT HERE TO TALK ABOUT WHY
22:18:53 WE NEVER APPROACHED HIM WHEN HE WAS PRESENT DURING THE
22:18:57 MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH.
22:19:01 WITH REGARD TO THE MIXED USE PROPERTY, I'M ALSO A LITTLE
22:19:03 CONFUSED BY FRAN.
22:19:05 IF YOU LOOK AT THIS, THE DOCUMENT I HAVE BEEN QUOTING FOR
22:19:09 THE YBOR VISION PLAN, SHE WAS ONE. AUTHORS TALKING ABOUT
22:19:14 THE MIXED USE.
22:19:15 BUT NOW SHE'S POINTING OUT SAYING SHE'S NOT IN FAVOR OF THE
22:19:18 MIXED USE, EVEN THOUGH HER NAME IS ON THIS DOCUMENT FOR THE
22:19:21 MIXED USE.
22:19:22 ALSO WE HAVE A LETTER OF THE SUPPORT FROM THE YCDC
22:19:25 THEMSELVES SIGNED BY THE CHAIR.
22:19:27 I CAN PULL IT OUT.
22:19:28 I DIDN'T HAVE THE TIME TO PUT IT IN THE PACKET OR YOU CAN
22:19:31 TAKE MY WORD FOR IT RIGHT NOW.
22:19:33 IT ACTUALLY FROM OF THE YCDC.
22:19:37 AND WITH REGARDS TO OUR LETTER, THE UNIFORM LETTER ON OUR
22:19:41 LETTERHEAD, ALL WE DID WAS PRINT THE E-MAILS THAT WE
22:19:44 RECEIVED, BECAUSE WE ASKED TO BE CC'ED ON THE -- MAIL.
22:19:47 IT MAY LOOK LIKE IT'S ON OUR LETTERHEAD BUT THAT'S JUST THE
22:19:50 E-MAIL I RECEIVED WHEN I PRINTED IT.
22:19:53 SO AGAIN, I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT OF YBOR CITY AND VM YBOR
22:19:58 SINCE I LIVED IN TAMPA.
22:19:59 WE REALLY WANT TO HELP THE COMMUNITY.
22:20:03 WE WANT SOMETHING THAT WILL BE SUCCESSFUL FOR THE ENTIRE
22:20:05 COMMUNITY.
22:20:06 WE REALLY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS OFFICE BUILDING HERE.
22:20:09 THE DIFFICULTIES WITH THIS SITE WITH THE CULVERT TO THE
22:20:12 NORTH BLOCKING THE ALLEY, ON A DEAD-END, YEAR JUST THANKFUL
22:20:18 THERE ARE CITY LOTS WITHIN 500 FEET, WE ARE THANKFUL THERE'S
22:20:22 A BUS STOP WITHIN 350 FEET.
22:20:25 SOME PEOPLE CAN USE THESE IN-FILL URBAN ITEMS THAT ARE
22:20:28 IMPORTANT TO HAVING IN-FILL WITH URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
22:20:32 SO WE ARE HAPPY ABOUT THAT.
22:20:34 AND AGAIN, OUR GOAL TODAY IS TO WALK OUT OF HERE WITH SOME
22:20:40 FORM OF APPROVAL OR GUIDANCE ON HOW TO GET APPROVAL SO WE
22:20:44 CAN COME BACK FOR THE SECOND READING SUCCESSFULLY.
22:20:46 AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE HERE.
22:20:48 AS I SAID BEFORE, WE REALLY WANT --
22:20:58 >> SEVERAL PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM WORKED ON THIS DOCUMENT.
22:21:02 I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE YCDC DURING THE TIME THIS DOCUMENT WAS
22:21:05 WRITTEN.
22:21:07 I HAVE ALSO SERVED AS A BOARD MEMBER OF THE YCDC AND I HAVE
22:21:11 BEEN A TREASURER OF THE V.M. YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
22:21:15 SO I AM VERY ENGAGED WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND I WANT TO GET
22:21:18 BACK IN THE -- GIVE BACK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:21:20 >>FRANK REDDICK: THANK YOU.
22:21:21 ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME?
22:21:23 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR MR.
22:21:29 VIMA IF POSSIBLE.
22:21:32 NOW, MR. VILLA, WERE YOU AT THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION
22:21:35 WHEN THEY VOTED?
22:21:36 >> I MISSED THE LAST MEETING.
22:21:38 I WAS ON VACATION BUT THEY HAD TWO MEETINGS.
22:21:41 I WILL TRY TO RECAP.
22:21:42 IN JUNE HE CAME IN FRONT OF THE BOARD WITH A SITE PLAN
22:21:45 THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT.
22:21:46 THE BOARD HAD DISCUSSION.
22:21:47 AND THEY GAVE HIM SOME DIRECTION AND THEN HE CAME IN JULY,
22:21:51 THE ONE THAT THEY RENDERED THE MOTION AND THEY CAME BACK
22:21:54 WITH THE SAME PLAN.
22:21:55 SO THAT'S THE DIFFICULTY THEY HAD WITH IT.
22:21:57 THEY WERE LOOKING FOR SOME MODIFICATION TO THE ORIGINAL
22:22:00 PLAN.
22:22:02 >>MIKE SUAREZ: AND I AM READING THE STAFF REPORT.
22:22:04 IT DOES BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION DENIED HIS APPLICATION.
22:22:08 AND UNLIKE OTHER THINGS THAT WE DO, WHEN WE DO A ZONING,
22:22:12 THERE ARE MORE LAYERS WITH YBOR CITY, AS YOU KNOW. I MEAN,
22:22:16 YOU ARE VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN THAT.
22:22:17 SO WHEN I SEE THAT, I KIND OF GIVE THEM A LITTLE BIT MORE
22:22:20 BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, BECAUSE THEY OBVIOUSLY THAT YOU ARE
22:22:23 ONLY GOAL IS TO MAKE SURE TO PRESERVE THE NATURE OF YBOR
22:22:29 CITY, [RUSTLING PAPERS] AND TO MAKE SURE REGULATIONS ARE PUT
22:22:33 IN PLACE.
22:22:34 OKAY.
22:22:34 THANK YOU.
22:22:34 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
22:22:37 [RUSTLING PAPERS] CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
22:22:40 I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. MANISCALCO.
22:22:41 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
22:22:44 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
22:22:45 OPPOSED?
22:22:46 OKAY.
22:22:47 MRS. CAPIN, DO YOU WANT TO READ IT?
22:22:50 >>YVONNE CAPIN: OKAY.
22:22:56 AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE
22:22:59 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE J GENERAL VICINITY OF 2305 NORTH
22:23:05 23rd STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE
22:23:07 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
22:23:09 CLASSIFICATION CC 2 YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL TO YC
22:23:14 9 YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICT SITE PLAN CONTROLLED, BUSINESS,
22:23:18 PROFESSIONAL, OFFICE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
22:23:19 >>FRANK REDDICK: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
22:23:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
22:23:24 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION BY MRS. CAPIN.
22:23:27 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
22:23:28 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
22:23:31 OPPOSED?
22:23:46 OKAY.
22:23:46 SUAREZ, MIRANDA -- ROLL CALL.
22:23:54 >> ROLL CALL VOTE.
22:23:56 >>MIKE SUAREZ: NO.
22:23:58 >>HARRY COHEN: [OFF MICROPHNE] YES.
22:23:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
22:24:00 >>YVONNE CAPIN: YES.
22:24:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
22:24:16 >>FRANK REDDICK: NO.
22:24:16 >> DEAD HEAT.
22:24:23 >>YVONNE CAPIN: IT'S A 3-3.
22:24:25 >> MOTION DID NOT CARRY.
22:24:32 SUAREZ, MANISCALCO AND REDDICK VOTING NO.
22:24:36 VIERA BEING ABSENT.
22:24:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, YOUR RULES STATE IF ANY
22:24:41 MOTION FAILS TO RECEIVE AT LEAST FOUR VOTES, THAT THE MOTION
22:24:45 DOES FAIL, AND ANOTHER MOTION IN ORDER IS NOT MADE, THEN THE
22:24:50 PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY REOPENED AND CONTINUED
22:24:52 TO A TIME CERTAIN AT THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL
22:24:56 MEETING.
22:24:59 WHICH IS THE 23rd.
22:25:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MAKE A MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, THAT WE
22:25:03 RESCHEDULE THIS VOTE --
22:25:06 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I WON'T BE HERE.
22:25:07 I WON'T BE HERE.
22:25:08 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FOR SOMETIME AFTER THE 23rd --
22:25:13 (LAUGHTER)
22:25:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SEPTEMBER 30 IS THE NEXT MEETING AFTER THE
22:25:18 23rd.
22:25:19 >>YVONNE CAPIN: IS THAT AT NIGHT?
22:25:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO.
22:25:22 IT'S A DAYTIME MEETING.
22:25:23 >> I HAVE A SMALL SURGERY AUGUST 30th.
22:25:30 I'M SORRY.
22:25:31 THAT'S MY BIRTHDAY AND I HAVE OTHER PLANS.
22:25:37 I'M TRAVELING.
22:25:39 EVERY DAY YOU MENTIONED.
22:25:40 THE 23rd I'M NOT HERE.
22:25:41 THE 30th I'M NOT HERE AT NIGHT.
22:25:43 WHAT WAS THE OTHER DATE?
22:25:47 IN THE MORNING?
22:25:49 MEDICAL.
22:25:49 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
22:25:50 >> WELL, GOOD.
22:25:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FIRST OF ALL, I CANNOT SPEAK FOR MR. VIERA
22:26:00 AND I DON'T KNOW THE REST OF COUNCIL.
22:26:03 IF YOU HAVE A FULL COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 6th I DON'T
22:26:05 KNOW.
22:26:06 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IS THE 13th THE NEXT ONE?
22:26:12 MRS. CAPIN WON'T BE HERE SO LET'S TAKE THAT OUT.
22:26:15 THEN THE 13th CRA?
22:26:18 THEN IT'S GOT TO BE SEPTEMBER 20th, 20TH OF SEPTEMBER AT
22:26:26 9:00 IN THE MORNING.
22:26:27 RIGHT AFTER WE DO THE INVOCATION AND THE CEREMONIES.
22:26:32 >>YVONNE CAPIN: YOU AREN'T GOING TO BELIEVE THIS. I'M
22:26:36 SUPPOSED TO BE AT ROLAND PARK ELEMENTARY.
22:26:41 MY SCHEDULE IS UNBELIEVABLE.
22:26:43 BUT I WILL BE HERE.
22:26:43 >> A MORE IMPORTANT OBLIGATION.
22:26:47 >>YVONNE CAPIN: YEAH, MAYBE, TO YOU.
22:26:51 SIR.
22:26:52 I HAVE OTHER OBLIGATIONS.
22:26:53 PEOPLE TAKE TIME OFF ALL THE TIME.
22:26:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LISTEN, NOW WE HAVE SEPTEMBER 20th AT
22:26:58 9:00 RIGHT AFTER CEREMONY OR WHATEVER WE HAVE.
22:27:01 >>FRANK REDDICK: SO WE HAVE IT SET FOR SEPTEMBER 20th?
22:27:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FIRST OF ALL, COUNCIL, WE ARE MOVING WAY
22:27:08 AHEAD OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE 20th.
22:27:12 YOUR RULES DO STATE THAT IT SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY REOPENED
22:27:15 AND CONTINUED TO A TIME CERTAIN AT THE NEXT REGULAR
22:27:19 SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING.
22:27:20 NOW, A COUNCIL MEMBER BEING ABSENT, I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE
22:27:24 TO IF I CAN INQUIRE OF PETITIONER AS TO THE DATE OF THAT.
22:27:29 >>YVONNE CAPIN: LET ME ASK YOU SOMETHING.
22:27:31 ON THE 30th HOW EARLY CAN WE DO THIS?
22:27:34 I HAVE A FLIGHT THAT I CAN --
22:27:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AUGUST 30th?
22:27:44 >> IT'S A WORKSHOP.
22:27:45 >>YVONNE CAPIN: BUT WHAT TIME IN THE EVENING?
22:27:48 CAN WE PUT IT FIRST?
22:27:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WE CAN PUT IT ANYWHERE WE WANT, YES.
22:27:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU CAN MAKE A MOTION TO WAIVE YOUR RULES
22:28:00 SO YOU CAN SET THIS THEN, IF IT'S COUNCIL'S PLEASURE, FOR
22:28:04 THE FIRST ITEM ON THE NIGHT MEETING OF AUGUST 30th AT 6
22:28:11 P.M.
22:28:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: MOTION FROM MR. MIRANDA.
22:28:15 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA TO WAIVE THE RULES AND SET THIS AS THE
22:28:20 FIRST ITEM ON AUGUST 30 AT 6:00 P.M.
22:28:24 IS THAT CORRECT?
22:28:25 ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT MOTION SAY AYE.
22:28:27 OPPOSED?
22:28:33 SIR, IT'S SET FOR AUGUST 30 --
22:28:37 THE 30th AT 6 P.M. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
22:28:40 >> IT HAS BEEN REOPENED FOR CONTINUED HEARING, FOR BOTH.
22:28:47 >>FRANK REDDICK: ALL RIGHT.
22:28:52 NEW BUSINESS.
22:28:52 MR. MIRANDA.
22:28:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOTHING, CHAIRMAN.
22:28:55 >>YVONNE CAPIN: NONE.
22:28:58 >>FRANK REDDICK: I GOT ONE ITEM.
22:28:59 I WANT TO REQUEST THAT MIDDLETON OUTREACH BE GIVEN A FIVE
22:29:09 MINUTE PRESENTATION ABOUT HUMAN TRAFFICKING ON AUGUST 30 AT
22:29:11 9:00 A.M.
22:29:14 WITH THE INCREASE IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN THE CITY OF TAMPA
22:29:16 AT 9:00 A.M. AUGUST 30.
22:29:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I INQUIRE, DO YOU WISH TO HAVE THAT --
22:29:24 BECAUSE YOU HAVE A LOT OF THINGS SET IN ORDER AT 9:00 A.M.
22:29:28 WHERE ON THE AGENDA WOULD YOU LIKE IT?
22:29:29 AFTER THE PRESENTATION AND COMMENDATION OF POLICE OFFICER OF
22:29:31 THE MONTH BUT BEFORE THE WORKSHOP?
22:29:34 >>FRANK REDDICK: IT'S 9 A.M.
22:29:35 I KNOW WE MIGHT NOT GET TO IT TILL 10.
22:29:38 BUT IT'S 9 A.M.
22:29:39 I JUST WANT IT TO BE ON THERE.
22:29:42 ALL RIGHT.
22:29:43 SO THAT'S THE MOTION.
22:29:45 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I BELIEVE MRS. CAPIN WAS THE PREVIOUS CHAIR
22:29:52 WOULD BE THE PERSON TO DO IT.
22:29:53 >>YVONNE CAPIN: WE HAVE A MOTION.
22:29:55 WE HAVE A SECOND.
22:29:56 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:29:58 OPPOSED?
22:29:58 >>FRANK REDDICK: MR. MANISCALCO.
22:30:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT
22:30:06 STAFF COME BACK THURSDAY AUGUST 23rd UNDER STAFF REPORTS
22:30:09 TO LET US KNOW HOW THE CITY IS GOING TO BE REGULATING AIRBNB
22:30:16 AND OTHER KINDS OF RENTALS.
22:30:20 >>FRANK REDDICK: I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. MANISCALCO.
22:30:23 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
22:30:27 IN FAVOR?
22:30:28 OPPOSED?
22:30:28 >> I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION WHO COMPETE IN THE
22:30:33 LITTLE LEAGUE WORLD SERIES IN KIRKLAND WASHINGTON AND TOOK
22:30:37 FIFTH IN THE WORLD, BAYSHORE LITTLE LEAGUE AND KEYSTONE
22:30:41 HEIGHTS LITTLE LEAGUE.
22:30:42 IF WE HE COULD DO THIS THURSDAY THE --
22:30:46 >> SECOND.
22:30:47 >>FRANK REDDICK: SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
22:30:49 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:30:50 MR. COHEN.
22:30:51 >>HARRY COHEN: ONE ITEM.
22:30:52 THERE WAS AN ARTICLE THAT BROKE IN THE "TAMPA BAY TIMES"
22:30:55 TONIGHT ABOUT LEAD BEING FOUND IN SOME PLUMBING FIXTURES IN
22:30:59 SCHOOLS.
22:31:02 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, AND CONTINUING TESTING GOING ON.
22:31:06 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK OUR STAFF COME BACK AT
22:31:09 OUR SEPTEMBER 5th REGULAR DAY MEETING AND LET US KNOW
22:31:13 WHAT THE CITY IS DOING IN TERMS OF TESTING FACILITIES THAT
22:31:19 WERE BUILT PRIOR TO 1986 TO MAKE SURE THAT THE WATER IS FREE
22:31:22 OF LEAD.
22:31:23 I'M SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO PARKS AND RECREATION CENTERS,
22:31:26 OTHER PLACES THAT THE PUBLIC --
22:31:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND THE WATER DEPARTMENT.
22:31:36 >>FRANK REDDICK: I THINK THIS BUILDING TOO.
22:31:38 MOVED BY MR. COHEN.
22:31:39 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
22:31:40 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:31:41 OPPOSED?
22:31:41 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
22:31:43 MR. SUAREZ?
22:31:44 >>MIKE SUAREZ: JUST ONE ITEM, SIR.
22:31:46 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT COUNCIL RATIFY AND
22:31:48 COMMENDATION PRESENTATION TO METRO DINER CELEBRATING CHICKEN
22:31:53 AND WAFFLE DAY WHICH WAS YESTERDAY AND IT WAS DELICIOUS.
22:31:55 >>FRANK REDDICK: CHICKEN AND WAFFLES?
22:31:59 >>MIKE SUAREZ: OH, YEAH.
22:32:00 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I WANT TO CLARIFY SOMETHING.
22:32:07 I'M HERE IN THE MORNING OR I'M HERE IN THE EVENING.
22:32:09 ON MOST DATES THAT WERE STATED I COULD BE HERE ON THE 13.
22:32:13 THAT WAS NOT A GOOD DAY.
22:32:14 I COULD BE HERE IN THE MORNING ANOTHER TIME.
22:32:15 THAT WAS NOT GOOD.
22:32:16 I COULD BE HERE IN THE EVENING.
22:32:17 IT'S NOT THAT I AM MISSING THE WHOLE MEETING.
22:32:19 I'M MISSING PART OF IT.
22:32:21 AND THAT IS DONE ALL THE TIME IN THIS HERE.
22:32:24 >>FRANK REDDICK: GOT A MOTION FROM MR. SUAREZ.
22:32:27 AND WHO SECONDED IT?
22:32:29 OH, SECONDED BY MR. COHEN.
22:32:31 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
22:32:33 I GOT A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
22:32:35 ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
22:32:41 SECONDED BY MR. MANISCALCO. RECEIVE AND FILE.
22:32:43 MIRANDA, SECONDED BY MANISCALCO.
22:32:52
22:33:06 (CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED).
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS FILE WAS PRODUCED IN ALL CAPITAL
LETTERS AND ANY VARIATION THERETO MAY BE A RESULT OF THIRD
PARTY EDITS AND SOFTWARE COMPATIBILITY ISSUES.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.