CITY OF TAMPA
THURSDAY, JUNE 13, 2019
EVENING SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT. BECAUSE THIS
DOCUMENT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS, AND/OR WORDS THAT DID NOT TRANSLATE CORRECTLY.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
[ROLL CALL WITHOUT AUDIO]
6:02:41PM >> HERE.
6:02:42PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
6:02:43PM DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 11?
6:02:46PM WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN -- I BELIEVE IT WAS CITRO.
6:02:50PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:02:52PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:02:53PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:02:54PM OKAY.
6:02:55PM YOU KNOW WHAT?
6:02:56PM SHOULD WE SWEAR EVERYBODY IN?
6:03:09PM >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH
6:03:12PM AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
6:03:16PM >>LUIS VIERA: GO AHEAD.
6:03:18PM THANK YOU.
6:03:19PM >> GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN, COUNCIL.
6:03:21PM LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
6:03:24PM COORDINATION.
6:03:24PM COUNCIL, IF I MAY, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF ITEMS I WOULD LIKE
6:03:27PM TO REVIEW ON THE AGENDA FOR CLEANUP ITEMS.
6:03:29PM ITEM NUMBER 2, WHICH IS REZ 19-09, CANNOT BE HEARD.
6:03:36PM THAT APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
6:03:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE?
6:03:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WITHDRAW ITEM 2, REZ 19-09.
6:03:43PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE BY COUNCILMAN
6:03:45PM MIRANDA.
6:03:46PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
6:03:48PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:03:49PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:03:50PM THANK YOU.
6:03:50PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
6:03:52PM ITEM NUMBER 5 IS REZ 19-43.
6:03:56PM THAT CANNOT BE HEARD.
6:03:57PM NO AFFIDAVIT FILED.
6:03:58PM >> SO MOVED.
6:03:59PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER TO
6:04:02PM REMOVE.
6:04:02PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
6:04:05PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:04:06PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:04:06PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: COUNCIL, THE LAST ITEM FOR DISCUSSION, ITEM
6:04:09PM NUMBER 1 IS A VACATING.
6:04:11PM THIS RUNS ALONG WITH WHAT IS LISTED ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA
6:04:15PM AS ITEM NUMBER 7.
6:04:17PM AND THAT IS A REZONING, REZ 19-32.
6:04:22PM NORMALLY THE REZONING IS HEARD WITH THE VACATING.
6:04:24PM IT IS CERTAINLY COUNCIL'S OPTION IF YOU'D LIKE TO MOVE ITEM
6:04:29PM 7 TO BE HEARD AND OPENED WITH ITEM 1.
6:04:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
6:04:34PM DO WE HAVE A MOTION?
6:04:36PM >> MOVE TO HEAR THEM TOGETHER.
6:04:37PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:04:39PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
6:04:40PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:04:41PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:04:44PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
6:04:50PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE BEGIN WITH ITEMS 1 AND 7 CONCURRENTLY OR AT
6:04:54PM THE SAME TIME.
6:04:54PM SAME THING, I GUESS.
6:04:58PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO, PLANNING DESIGN AND
6:05:00PM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
6:05:01PM ITEM NUMBER 1 IN YOUR AGENDA IS VAR 19-10 FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
6:05:06PM ALLEY VACATION.
6:05:07PM AND ITEM NUMBER 7 IS REZ 19-32.
6:05:10PM IT'S FOR A PD REZONING FROM CG AND RM-16 FOR MULTIFAMILY
6:05:15PM RESIDENTIAL RESTAURANT AND SHOPPING CENTER WITH ALL CG USES
6:05:20PM AT 2015, 2017 MAPLE AVENUE.
6:05:28PM >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING.
6:05:29PM DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:05:32PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
6:05:33PM THE FIRST REZONING SITE THIS EVENING IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
6:05:37PM PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE PALMETTO BEACH
6:05:42PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:05:44PM THERE IS NO TRANSIT SERVICE WITHIN THAT AREA.
6:05:47PM IT IS WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
6:05:51PM AND THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS DESOTO PARK,
6:05:55PM WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 2,800 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE
6:05:59PM SUBJECT SITE.
6:05:59PM ON TO THE AERIAL, YOU CAN SEE -- HERE'S THE SUBJECT SITE.
6:06:12PM THIS IS 22nd STREET.
6:06:22PM 20TH IS THE MAIN NORTH-SOUTH ROADWAY NOW THROUGH PALMETTO
6:06:22PM BEACH.
6:06:22PM A LOT OF THE PORT PROPERTY IS TO THE WEST OF 20th STREET.
6:06:25PM THIS PORTION OF 22nd STREET CONTAINS A MIXTURE OF
6:06:30PM RESIDENTIAL, VACANT PROPERTY AND SOME LIGHT COMMERCIAL USES.
6:06:36PM THIS WAS THE FORMER SITE OF STONEY'S BAR.
6:06:41PM ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE HAS TWO
6:06:46PM FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
6:06:51PM THE EASTERN PORTION ALONG SOUTH 22nd STREET IN THAT PINK
6:06:55PM COLOR IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
6:06:58PM THE BACK PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE BASICALLY RUNS STRAIGHT
6:07:02PM DOWN IN THIS REDDISH COLOR.
6:07:04PM THAT'S ALL THAT TRANSITIONAL USE 24.
6:07:07PM THE LIGHT GRAY AS WE MOVE WEST ACROSS 20th STREET THAT'S
6:07:12PM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND THEN WE GET INTO THE BLACK OR THE VERY
6:07:15PM DARK GRAY.
6:07:16PM THAT IS THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL.
6:07:18PM AND THEN YOU DO HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL 20 REPRESENTED BY THE
6:07:23PM BROWN.
6:07:23PM AND THEN THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PORTION OF THE
6:07:26PM NEIGHBORHOOD IS LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IN
6:07:29PM THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
6:07:33PM THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE A 1.03-ACRE SITE FROM THAT
6:07:40PM RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 16 AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO A
6:07:43PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH 31
6:07:47PM RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 6,500 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES.
6:07:51PM APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REVITALIZATION
6:07:55PM OF A VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITE IN THE PALMETTO BEACH
6:07:58PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:07:59PM THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES THE DEVELOPMENT AND
6:08:01PM RETENTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING TYPES TO
6:08:04PM MEET THE NEEDS OF ITS PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATION.
6:08:07PM THE APPLICANT PLANS TO DEVELOP 31 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON THE
6:08:12PM PARCEL FURTHERING ONE OF THE PLAN'S MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
6:08:16PM POLICIES, 9.6.1 UNDER THE LAND USE SECTION.
6:08:20PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OVER
6:08:23PM SINGLE USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
6:08:26PM THE PD IS PROPOSING MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, A RESTAURANT
6:08:29PM AND STRIP SHOPPING CENTER.
6:08:32PM THIS WILL PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES TO THE SURROUNDING
6:08:34PM NEIGHBORHOOD AND FURTHER THE POLICY DIRECTION OF THE
6:08:36PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
6:08:37PM THE PROPERTY IS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
6:08:40PM STAFF -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO THE
6:08:43PM APPLICANT TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THERE WILL
6:08:46PM NOT BE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON HURRICANE EVACUATION TIMES,
6:08:50PM ROUTES, OR SHELTER DEMANDS FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE PROPOSED
6:08:54PM DEVELOPMENT.
6:08:54PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
6:08:58PM FINDS THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE
6:09:00PM PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
6:09:03PM THANK YOU.
6:09:06PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
6:09:19PM >>JAMES COOK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
6:09:21PM SPEAKING TO ITEM NUMBER 1 THE VACATING.
6:09:23PM CASE VAC 19-10.
6:09:26PM THE APPLICANT IS PETITIONING TO VACATE A T-SHAPED ALLEY
6:09:29PM LYING NORTH OF OAKWOOD AVENUE, SOUTH OF MAPLE AVENUE, EAST
6:09:32PM OF SOUTH 20th STREET AND WEST OF SOUTH 22nd STREET.
6:09:37PM GO TO THE OVERHEAD.
6:09:39PM THE PETITIONER -- APPLICANT SITE HIGHLIGHTED IN RED.
6:09:42PM THIS IS A T-SHAPED ALLEY MADE UP OF A NORTH-SOUTH SEGMENT
6:09:46PM RUNNING FROM OAKWOOD TO MAPLE AND EAST-WEST SEGMENT RUNNING
6:09:49PM FROM 20th TO 22nd.
6:09:52PM POINT OF REFERENCE, MCKAY BAY ON THE EAST.
6:09:55PM THE ALLEY IS TEN FEET WIDE.
6:09:58PM IT'S UNIMPROVED GRASS.
6:10:00PM IT'S NOT WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OR AN OVERLAY
6:10:03PM DISTRICT.
6:10:04PM IT'S WITHIN EDGEWATER PARK SUBDIVISION PLAT, WHICH I HAVE A
6:10:09PM COPY OF RIGHT HERE, PLATTED 1912.
6:10:12PM THE SUBJECT ALLEY IS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW.
6:10:14PM THE GREEN ALLEYS ARE ALLEYS THAT ARE STILL OPEN AND THE RED
6:10:17PM ARE ALLEYS THAT HAVE BEEN VACATED PREVIOUSLY.
6:10:19PM WITHIN THE AREA IN A QUARTER MILE SPREAD OUT A LITTLE BIT
6:10:25PM YOU CAN SEE THERE ARE A COUPLE MORE ALLEYS THAT ARE STILL
6:10:28PM OPEN AND A COUPLE THAT ARE VACATED.
6:10:31PM THERE'S 13 VACATED AND 16 ARE STILL OPEN.
6:10:34PM GOT A COUPLE OF PICTURES.
6:10:38PM THIS IS THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY LOOKING NORTH FROM OAKWOOD
6:10:41PM AVENUE.
6:10:42PM THIS IS OBSTRUCTED BY UTILITY POLES AND SOME OVERGROWTH.
6:10:45PM THIS IS THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY LOOKING SOUTH FROM MAPLE
6:10:49PM AVENUE.
6:10:50PM EAST-WEST ALLEY IS RIGHT HERE WHERE ALL THIS OVERGROWTH IS
6:10:55PM RIGHT HERE AND IT HEADS WEST.
6:10:57PM THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY LOOKING SOUTH
6:11:03PM FROM THE EAST-WEST ALLEY.
6:11:05PM MID BLOCK.
6:11:06PM HERE'S A PICTURE OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY LOOKING WEST FROM
6:11:13PM THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY.
6:11:14PM YOU CAN SEE SHORTLY AS YOU GET IN, THE ALLEY IS BLOCKED BY
6:11:18PM OVERGROWTH.
6:11:18PM THIS IS COMING FROM THE OTHER SIDE.
6:11:22PM THIS IS THE EAST-WEST ALLEY LOOKING EAST FROM 20th STREET.
6:11:25PM THERE IS A CONCRETE APRON OFF 20th STREET.
6:11:28PM PROBABLY PART OF THE F.D.O.T. JOB ON 20th STREET.
6:11:32PM AS YOU GET FURTHER DOWN THE ALLEY, YOU CAN SEE TIRE RUTS SO
6:11:35PM IT IS BEING USED.
6:11:36PM THAT'S LOOKING EAST.
6:11:38PM I THINK I MISSED ONE.
6:11:39PM FURTHER DOWN THE ALLEY, MORE TIRE RUTS.
6:11:44PM THERE IS A FENCE AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED 2007, 2009 MAPLE
6:11:52PM AVENUE.
6:11:52PM IT IS CHAINED.
6:11:53PM I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE USING IT BUT IT DOES GRANT ACRES TO
6:11:59PM THE ALLEY.
6:12:00PM WHILE I WAS OUT THERE TAKING PICTURES, THERE WAS A CAR
6:12:02PM PARKED AT THE END OF THE ALLEY HEADING EAST.
6:12:06PM IT'S RIGHT AT THE END WHERE IT IS BLOCKED OFF AND YOU CAN'T
6:12:08PM CONTINUE EAST.
6:12:09PM A COUPLE OF PICTURES OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.
6:12:13PM THAT'S LOOKING WEST FROM 22nd STREET.
6:12:16PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTH FROM OAKWOOD AVENUE.
6:12:19PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH FROM MAPLE AVENUE.
6:12:26PM AND THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH FROM MAPLE AVENUE.
6:12:29PM I'LL GO BACK TO THE OVERHEAD.
6:12:37PM YOU CAN SEE THE ALLEY ACTUALLY RUNS ALL THE WAY TO 20th
6:12:41PM STREET.
6:12:41PM THE PETITIONER ORIGINALLY APPLIED FOR THE WHOLE ALLEY TO BE
6:12:47PM VACATED.
6:12:47PM AFTER REVIEW FROM TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION DESIGN
6:12:50PM THEY REALIZED THE TIRE RUTS, IT LOOKS LIKE SOMEBODY WAS
6:12:53PM USING IT FOR ACCESS.
6:12:55PM PETITIONER SCALED BACK THE VACATING TO ONLY WHAT'S
6:12:59PM HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW.
6:13:00PM THEY'LL GIVE BACK A TEN-FOOT ALLEY THAT HEADS NORTH OFF TO
6:13:05PM MAPLE SO THE ALLEY WILL NOT DEAD END.
6:13:09PM BY DOING THIS, THEY ARE NOT VIOLATING CITY CODE.
6:13:12PM PROPOSED VACATING IS APPROXIMATELY 3500 SQUARE FEET.
6:13:14PM BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM CITY DEPARTMENTS AND
6:13:19PM REVIEWING AGENCIES, STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS AS LONG AS ALL
6:13:24PM THE CONDITIONS IN THE ORDINANCE ARE MET.
6:13:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
6:13:27PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. COOK, WERE YOU DONE?
6:13:28PM >>JAMES COOK: YES.
6:13:30PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN YOU PUT THE LAST ONE BACK?
6:13:32PM NOW GO BACK ONE MORE TO THE ONE THAT SHOWS THE PROPOSED
6:13:38PM VACATING.
6:13:39PM THE HASHMARKS IN YELLOW I TAKE IT IS THE VACATING.
6:13:48PM >>JAMES COOK: THAT'S CORRECT.
6:13:49PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THE -- THE ONLY CONCERN I HAVE IS THE
6:13:52PM LITTLE PIECE OF PROPERTY -- YEAH.
6:13:55PM THAT ONE.
6:13:56PM >>JAMES COOK: WE HAVE A LETTER FROM THE OWNER OF THIS LOT.
6:13:58PM THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF THE VACATING.
6:14:00PM THEY OWN TWO LOTS THERE.
6:14:01PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEY'VE GOT TWO LOTS.
6:14:03PM >>JAMES COOK: THEY'LL GET HALF OF A VACATING THAT ABUTS.
6:14:06PM THE OTHER HALF WILL STILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE EAST-WEST
6:14:09PM PROPORTION AND THE PROPOSED TEN-FOOT STRIP THAT HEADS NORTH.
6:14:13PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT HOUSE STRADDLES IT AND THEY'LL STILL
6:14:17PM BE ABLE TO ACCESS A USABLE PORTION OF THE ALLEY.
6:14:20PM >>JAMES COOK: THAT'S CORRECT.
6:14:21PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OTHERWISE, THEY WOULD HAVE FIVE FEET.
6:14:23PM >>JAMES COOK: FIVE -- THE WESTERN LOT, THAT WHOLE ALLEY WILL
6:14:28PM STAY OPEN TO GRANT ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY.
6:14:31PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
6:14:32PM SUPER.
6:14:33PM HAVE WE HEARD FROM ANYBODY ELSE UP AND DOWN THE ALLEY?
6:14:38PM >>JAMES COOK: NO, SIR.
6:14:40PM >>LUIS VIERA: GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
6:14:45PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO.
6:14:46PM AGAIN, THEY'RE ASKING FOR A PD REZONING FROM RM-16 AND CG TO
6:14:52PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT.
6:14:56PM HERE'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
6:15:01PM IT'S CURRENTLY IN GREEN.
6:15:02PM ALONG 22nd STREET IS A SWATH OF CG ZONING WITH A COUPLE OF
6:15:07PM PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PDs.
6:15:10PM AND THEN THE REMAINING OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN 20th STREET
6:15:13PM AND THE CG SECTION IS ALL ZONED RM-16.
6:15:16PM MR. COOK ALREADY SHOWED YOU AERIALS -- I'M SORRY, PICTURES
6:15:21PM OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
6:15:24PM I'LL GET RIGHT TO THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
6:15:26PM I KNOW THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL GO OVER THIS IN
6:15:29PM MORE DETAIL.
6:15:29PM BUT BRIEFLY, AS STATED, THE SITE IS A LITTLE OVER ONE ACRE.
6:15:35PM THEY ARE REQUESTING 31 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND A
6:15:40PM RESTAURANT AS WELL AS STRIP COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER FOR A
6:15:43PM TOTAL OF 6500 SQUARE FEET.
6:15:45PM THEY WILL DRIVE VEHICULAR ACCESS OFF OF MAPLE AND OAKWOOD.
6:15:52PM THERE ARE TWO CONNECTIONS ONTO MAPLE AVENUE AND THEN ONE ON
6:15:55PM TO OAKWOOD.
6:15:57PM THERE'S NO VEHICULAR ACCESS ONTO 22nd AVENUE.
6:15:59PM THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE ZERO TO THE NORTH, ZERO TO THE
6:16:04PM SOUTH.
6:16:05PM TO THE EAST IS ZERO AND TO THE WEST IS A 10-FOOT SETBACK.
6:16:10PM THE BLUE OUTLINE SHOWS THE UPPER STORIES OF THE PROPOSED
6:16:16PM BUILDING.
6:16:18PM THIS IS THE FRONT VIEW OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING WHERE YOU
6:16:28PM CAN SEE THAT THE FRONT ON 22nd IS ACTIVATED WITH CG USES
6:16:34PM AS WELL AS A POTENTIAL RESTAURANT AND THEN THE MULTIFAMILY
6:16:37PM DWELLING UNITS ARE ABOVE FOR A FOUR-STORY BUILDING.
6:16:39PM AS FAR AS STAFF'S REVIEW OF THIS PROPOSAL, THERE ARE SIX
6:16:45PM WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
6:16:46PM THE FIRST ONE IS SECTION 13165 D, TREE TRUST FUND IN LIEU OF
6:16:53PM THE REQUIRED TREES TO BE PLANTED ON-SITE AND WITH THE
6:16:59PM CURRENT RATE OF $150 PER INCH FOR THIS DISTRICT.
6:17:03PM THE SECOND WAIVER THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING IS FOR ACCESS TO A
6:17:07PM LOCAL STREET.
6:17:08PM BOTH MAPLE AND OAKWOOD ARE LOCAL STREETS.
6:17:10PM BECAUSE THERE IS A COMMERCIAL ELEMENT TO THIS PROJECT THAT
6:17:13PM WAIVER IS REQUIRED.
6:17:14PM THEY'RE REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN PARKING PER THE MIX OF
6:17:19PM USES, AGAIN, 6500 COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT WITH THE 31 DWELLING
6:17:24PM UNITS.
6:17:25PM 82 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED.
6:17:27PM THEY ARE ASKING TO WAIVE THAT DOWN TO 62, A PARKING
6:17:30PM REDUCTION OF 24%.
6:17:32PM TRANSPORTATION, AS WELL AS PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
6:17:36PM COORDINATION DID FIND THAT WAIVER INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND
6:17:39PM DEVELOPMENT CODE.
6:17:40PM FOURTH WAIVER TO 27-284 IS TO REDUCE THE USE BUFFER ALONG
6:17:49PM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE FROM 15 FEET WITH THE SIX-FOOT HIGH
6:17:53PM WALL BECAUSE IT IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO TEN FEET
6:17:56PM WITH THE SIX-FOOT HIGH PVC FENCE.
6:17:59PM THERE'S A REDUCTION IN THE VEHICULAR USE AREA BUFFER ALONG
6:18:05PM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE INSTEAD OF 8 FEET, THEY ARE
6:18:08PM REQUESTING TO GO DOWN TO 6 FEET.
6:18:11PM SUBJECT TO AN IN LIEU PAYMENT.
6:18:13PM AND THEN THE LAST WAIVER THEY'RE REQUESTING IS TO 27-285,
6:18:17PM THE MULTIFAMILY GREENSPACE.
6:18:18PM AS YOU KNOW, THE CODE REQUIRES 350 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING
6:18:23PM UNIT.
6:18:23PM THEY'RE AVERAGE BEING 217 PER DWELLING UNIT.
6:18:26PM FOR A TOTAL DEFICIENCY OF 4,126 SQUARE FEET OF GREENSPACE
6:18:31PM THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR A WAIVER.
6:18:34PM IF THAT WAIVER IS APPROVED BY COUNCIL THEY WOULD HAVE TO PAY
6:18:38PM AN IN LIEU FEE FOR THE GREENSPACE WAIVER.
6:18:40PM THAT WAS THE SECOND INCONSISTENCY THAT PLANNING AND
6:18:42PM DEVELOPMENT -- PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
6:18:45PM DID FIND THE MULTIFAMILY GREENSPACE WAIVER.
6:18:48PM OTHER THAN THAT, IF IT'S CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE
6:18:52PM THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, THERE ARE READVISING BETWEEN FIRST
6:18:54PM AND SECOND READING FROM PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
6:18:58PM COORDINATION, BASICALLY NOTES TO CORRECT ON THE SITE PLAN.
6:19:02PM TRANSPORTATION AGAIN FOUND IT INCONSISTENT FOR THE PARKING
6:19:05PM WAIVER AS WELL AS THE ACCESS TO A LOCAL.
6:19:08PM THEY HAVE A COUPLE OF SMALL CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
6:19:10PM READING.
6:19:11PM NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH SOME CHANGES.
6:19:16PM AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
6:19:17PM OVERALL, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF DID
6:19:21PM FIND IT INCONSISTENT, AS I STATED, BECAUSE OF THE PARKING
6:19:26PM REDUCTION AND GREENSPACE REDUCTION.
6:19:29PM HOWEVER, SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE IT
6:19:34PM PLEASE REMEMBER TO INCLUDE THE REVISION SHEET.
6:19:36PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
6:19:38PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
6:19:41PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO CALCULATE ON THE
6:19:48PM FLY, BUT HOW MANY UNITS WOULD BE ALLOWED IF THIS JUST
6:19:54PM DEVELOPED OUT AS THE COMMERCIAL AND UNDER THE RM-16?
6:20:02PM IS THERE AN APPROXIMATION ON THAT?
6:20:07PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: JUST UNDER THE RM 16 FOR THE WESTERN
6:20:10PM PORTION OF THE PROPERTY?
6:20:13PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, COULDN'T YOU DO SOME RESIDENTIAL IN
6:20:16PM THE COMMERCIAL ZONE AS WELL OR NO?
6:20:20PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: IN THE CG ZONING DISTRICT, UNDER THE
6:20:23PM CURRENT CODE, YOU COULD DO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL MIX.
6:20:26PM ONCE YOU CROSS THIS ZONING LINE, YOU COULD ONLY HAVE
6:20:28PM RESIDENTIAL USES IN THAT PROPERTY.
6:20:30PM SO THE OVERALL DENSITY UNDER THE ALLOWABLE OVERALL DENSITY.
6:20:38PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M SORRY, THE LAST THING YOU SAID?
6:20:41PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THEY ARE UNDER THE MAXIMUM DENSITY THAT
6:20:42PM THEY COULD ACHIEVE ON-SITE.
6:20:44PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AS FAR AS THE COMP PLAN IS CONCERNED?
6:20:46PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: UM-HUM.
6:20:49PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THERE'S NO ESTIMATE IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY
6:20:55PM COULD HAVE BUILT IF WE JUST LEFT IT IN THE EXISTING ZONING.
6:20:59PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: PLANNING COMMISSION, DO YOU HAVE AN
6:21:02PM ESTIMATE OF PER THE DIFFERENT LAND USE CATEGORIES?
6:21:03PM SORRY TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT.
6:21:10PM >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:21:11PM THE MAXIMUMS UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES --
6:21:17PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO.
6:21:18PM THE BUILD-OUT UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING CATEGORIES.
6:21:26PM IN OTHER WORDS IT LOOKS LIKE ABOUT HALF OF THE ACREAGE IS
6:21:28PM UNDER THE CG RIGHT NOW AND HAVE -- AND THE BACK HALF IS
6:21:33PM UNDER THE RM-16.
6:21:35PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: RIGHT, BUT PER THE ZONING DISTRICT, PER
6:21:37PM THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE DENSITY -- THE AMOUNT OF SQUARE
6:21:40PM FOOTAGE OF DEVELOPMENT YOU CAN HAVE DEFAULTS TO THE COMP
6:21:44PM PLAN.
6:21:44PM SO IN THE CG ZONING DISTRICT, IT SAYS YOU REFER TO THE
6:21:48PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH BY RIGHT YOU GET A 1 F.A.R.?
6:21:52PM >>DAVID HEY: BY RIGHT, YES.
6:21:54PM AND 2 WITH THE BONUS.
6:21:57PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: RIGHT, BUT THEY ARE NOT BONUSING.
6:22:00PM >>DAVID HEY: UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, 15 DWELLING
6:22:03PM UNITS COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THAT PORTION OF THE SITE.
6:22:07PM UNDER THE TRANSITIONAL USE 24 PORTION, 14 DWELLING UNITS.
6:22:14PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHICH IS PRETTY CLOSE TO WHAT THEY'RE
6:22:16PM ASKING FOR.
6:22:17PM >>DAVID HEY: THE UNIQUENESS OF THE CATEGORIES IS USUALLY A
6:22:19PM MIXED USE, YOU CAN EITHER USE THE FLOOR AREA RATIO OR THE
6:22:24PM DENSITY COUNT.
6:22:25PM THE TRANSITIONAL USE 24 DOES NOT ALLOW THAT OPTION, SO THE
6:22:31PM APPLICANT DID WORK WITH US TO ENSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE
6:22:33PM AMOUNT OF DENSITY IS WITHIN EACH FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY,
6:22:37PM THAT THEY DID NOT EXCEED THEIR MAXIMUMS.
6:22:41PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DAVID, DID YOU SPEAK TO THE PARKING
6:22:43PM ISSUE?
6:22:44PM IS THAT PART OF YOUR ANALYSIS AT ALL?
6:22:45PM >>DAVID HEY: NO.
6:22:46PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THERE ARE NO POLICIES DIRECTLY
6:22:50PM DEALING WITH THE REDUCTION IN PARKING.
6:22:52PM THERE ARE POLICIES WITHIN THE COMP PLAN ABOUT STRUCTURED
6:22:55PM PARKING AND HOW THAT SHOULD BE INTEGRATED INTO BUILDINGS AND
6:22:59PM SUCH, BUT NOTHING ABOUT PARKING REDUCTIONS.
6:23:00PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
6:23:01PM THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
6:23:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
6:23:02PM ANYONE ELSE?
6:23:03PM OKAY.
6:23:06PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
6:23:07PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, MA'AM.
6:23:07PM THE APPLICANT NEXT, PLEASE.
6:23:23PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
6:23:25PM I'M MICHAEL HORNER, 14502 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY
6:23:29PM REPRESENTING CTV CAPITAL, THE OWNER OF THE APPLICANT OF THE
6:23:33PM REQUEST BEFORE YOU.
6:23:33PM WELCOME TO THE NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO I HAVEN'T MET BEFORE,
6:23:37PM MR. DINGFELDER, WELCOME BACK.
6:23:39PM IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE.
6:23:40PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
6:23:41PM WITH ME TONIGHT IS THE MEMBERSHIP OF OUR CTV DEVELOPMENT
6:23:46PM TEAM.
6:23:46PM I WILL LEAD THE PRESENTATION, MR. KEEFER NORRIS WILL FOLLOW
6:23:51PM ME.
6:23:52PM MR. VINCENT JACKSON FROM CTV MAKE A CLOSING STATEMENT ON
6:23:57PM REBUTTAL.
6:23:57PM COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE WORKED HARD WITH STAFF ON THIS REQUEST,
6:24:04PM I WANT TO SAY MONTHS, GOING BACK ALMOST TWO SITE PLAN
6:24:06PM ITERATIONS, A NUMBER OF AMENDMENTS.
6:24:10PM MR. NORRIS WORKED DILIGENTLY ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION.
6:24:18PM NO OPPOSITION TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION.
6:24:18PM I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY OPPOSITION FROM THIS NEIGHBORHOOD,
6:24:18PM IN FACT, SUBSTANTIAL SUPPORT FROM PALMETTO BEACH.
6:24:21PM CONTEXT-WISE, YOU MAY RECALL BEING BEFORE YOU A YEAR AGO,
6:24:25PM FOUR MEMBERS AT LEAST WILL REMEMBER THIS.
6:24:28PM THIS WAS THE CTV 5.2-ACRE TRACT, WHICH WAS A PLAN AMENDMENT
6:24:32PM ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER.
6:24:34PM OUR CLIENT OWNS THAT.
6:24:35PM THE CLIENT IS DEVELOPING THAT.
6:24:38PM WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH A PD REZONING BUT YOU WERE KIND ENOUGH
6:24:41PM TO GRANT US UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
6:24:45PM OFFICE, RETAIL, CONDO RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT THE NORTHEAST
6:24:47PM CORNER.
6:24:48PM I PROMISED YOU THEN THAT WE WOULD NOT FILE THAT PD REZONING
6:24:52PM UNTIL WE VETTED ALL THE ISSUES IN THE COMMUNITY AND WE LOOK
6:24:55PM FORWARD TO FILING THAT PD REZONING IN THE FUTURE.
6:24:58PM THIS PARCEL IS THE GATEWAY TO THAT 5.2-ACRE TRACT.
6:25:01PM OUR CLIENTS HAVE A VESTED INTEREST, OBVIOUSLY.
6:25:04PM THAT'S THE FRONT DOOR ON THE 22nd STREET CORRIDOR TO THE
6:25:07PM 5.2-ACRE SITE.
6:25:09PM THAT IS SMALLER MICROCOSM OF THAT OPPORTUNITY.
6:25:13PM IT IS STILL A CREATIVE URBAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT
6:25:16PM INTEGRATES RESIDENTIAL OVER RETAIL BUILDING.
6:25:20PM THE SUBJECT SITE, AS MARY NOTED IS ABOUT OVER AN ACRE, THE
6:25:26PM SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF MAPLE AVENUE AND 22nd STREET.
6:25:28PM MR. DINGFELDER, YOU NOTICED THAT WE DO HAVE TWO DIFFERENT
6:25:31PM ZONING DISTRICTS.
6:25:32PM WE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT PLAN SECTORS.
6:25:34PM WE HAVE TRANSITIONAL USE ON THE RM-16 AND CMU-35 ON THE
6:25:39PM EASTERN CG.
6:25:39PM THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT THAT YOU APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY WAS
6:25:42PM ALL CMU 35.
6:25:44PM YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE ALL CG USES DIRECTLY ACROSS THIS SITE ON
6:25:49PM 22nd STREET.
6:25:50PM THIS IS A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT.
6:25:55PM 31 UNITS OVER RETAIL THAT WE THINK IS APPROPRIATE.
6:25:59PM WE'RE NOT ASKING -- WHEN I HEAR THE WORD STRIP COMMERCIAL,
6:26:02PM STRIP SHOPPING CENTER, I TEND TO REACT A LITTLE HARSH
6:26:06PM BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A STRIP SHOPPING CENTER BUT THAT'S HOW
6:26:10PM CG IS DEFINED FOR ANY COMMERCIAL USES FOR THOSE USES
6:26:13PM REQUESTED.
6:26:14PM THIS IS 6500 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 3400 SQUARE FEET A
6:26:19PM RESTAURANT, 3,000 SQUARE FEET WILL BE RETAIL BUSINESS.
6:26:23PM WE DON'T HAVE ANY BUSINESSES OUT THERE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY.
6:26:26PM THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE HAVE BEEN
6:26:28PM CLOSED UP OVER THE YEARS BASED UPON THE VACATING OF THE
6:26:32PM TRAFFIC, THE REDEDICATION OF THE CORRIDOR FROM 22nd STREET
6:26:34PM TO 20th STREET TO THE WEST.
6:26:36PM AND UNFORTUNATELY, WHILE IT TOOK ALL THE TRUCK TRAFFIC AWAY,
6:26:40PM IT TOOK A LOT OF THE THRU TRAFFIC AWAY.
6:26:45PM UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAVE TO REGENERATE AND REENERGIZE THIS
6:26:48PM CORRIDOR SO THAT WE HAVE A STREET THAT IS FUNCTIONAL, IT'S
6:26:51PM FAR AWAY FROM A COMPLETE STREET PROJECT.
6:26:53PM WE HAVE LOTS OF PAVEMENT.
6:26:55PM 22nd STREET WAS DESIGNED FOR ONE PURPOSE ONLY AND THAT IS
6:26:58PM TO MOVE HIGH-VOLUME TRUCK TRAFFIC AND MOTORING TRAFFIC.
6:27:01PM WE WANT TO BRING THAT DOWN TO A NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE.
6:27:04PM THAT'S WHY OUR COMMERCIAL RELATES DIRECTLY TO 22nd STREET.
6:27:07PM WE DON'T WANT ACCESS DRIVES ON 22nd STREET.
6:27:09PM WE DIVERTED THOSE TO THE SIDE.
6:27:12PM AND THOSE ACCESS DRIVES NORTH AND SOUTH ARE WITHIN
6:27:14PM COMMERCIAL ZONED AREAS, BOTH NORTH OF US AND SOUTH OF US.
6:27:18PM HISTORICALLY, COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE'VE GONE THROUGH.
6:27:29PM THIS IS FOR YOUR CONTEXT, THE PRIOR 5.2 ACRES, THE STONEY
6:27:35PM SITE.
6:27:36PM WE'RE LOOKING WESTWARD FROM MCKAY BAY.
6:27:38PM THE STONEY SITE WOULD BE JUST TO THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT.
6:27:42PM THIS IS THE MIXED USE THAT OUR CLIENTS HAVE NOT FILED A PD
6:27:45PM ZONING FOR BUT THESE ARE THE CONCEPTUAL ILLUSTRATIONS WE
6:27:49PM PROVIDED ON THE CPA.
6:27:50PM THIS IS STONEY'S.
6:27:51PM BEEN THERE FOREVER.
6:27:52PM IN FACT, STILL HAS 4.5 STARS I THINK OUT OF 5 ON YELP.
6:27:57PM IT'S THE MAINSTAY.
6:27:59PM IT WAS THE MAINSTAY OF THIS COMMUNITY.
6:28:01PM PEOPLE LOVED IT.
6:28:02PM I THINK IT WAS ONE OF THE BEST DIVE BAR IN PALMETTO BEACH.
6:28:07PM BILLIARDS, POOL TABLE, DARTS, GOOD SANDWICHES AND GOOD FUN.
6:28:11PM THIS IS SOLELY WITHIN THE CG COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
6:28:14PM BEHIND IT, YOU CAN SEE BLIGHTED STRUCTURES, DIFFICULT
6:28:17PM REPAIR.
6:28:18PM OUR CLIENT IS PROPOSING TO BRING ALL THAT DOWN AND
6:28:24PM RECONSTRUCT SO WE HAVE A REENERGIZED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
6:28:31PM HERE WE ARE ON 22nd STREET.
6:28:33PM USED TO BE THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE.
6:28:34PM NOW REROUTED TO 20th STREET TO THE WEST.
6:28:37PM YOU HAVE ALL THE IH PORT AUTHORITY TO THE WEST.
6:28:39PM BEAUTIFUL PALMETTO BEACH, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES.
6:28:44PM WE HAVE MCKAY BAY ON THE EAST SIDE.
6:28:46PM ALL THAT TRAFFIC NOW HAS BEEN CUT BACK BY ALMOST 80%.
6:28:51PM HERE'S A VIEW LOOKING I GUESS SOUTHWEST.
6:28:57PM I THINK MAPLE AVENUE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY HERE.
6:29:00PM ON THIS LUCKY DAY THERE'S ONE CAR ON 22nd STREET.
6:29:04PM AND THEN ON THE NORTH SIDE, LOOKING NORTH, OUR SITE WOULD BE
6:29:07PM JUST TO OUR LEFT.
6:29:08PM NO CARS ON 22nd STREET.
6:29:12PM NO SIDEWALKS, NO LANE IMPROVEMENTS.
6:29:14PM CURBING, NO BENCHES, NO DECORATIVE LIGHTING, NO GATEWAY
6:29:19PM FEATURES.
6:29:20PM WE NEED TO BE STAKEHOLDERS, WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY, WORK
6:29:23PM WITH CITY COUNCIL AND CITY OF TAMPA.
6:29:25PM WE NEED TO BRING 22nd STREET BACK TO A NEIGHBORHOOD
6:29:31PM SERVING ROADWAY.
6:29:32PM OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS MARY WENT OVER, IS FAIRLY
6:29:34PM STRAIGHTFORWARD, BUT IT'S CREATIVE TO THE EXTENT THAT IT
6:29:40PM FITS ALL THE NECESSARY INGREDIENTS TO MAKE THIS A WORKABLE
6:29:44PM MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
6:29:45PM YOU HAVE TO HAVE A CRITICAL MASS.
6:29:49PM YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE.
6:29:53PM YOU JUST CAN'T ARBITRARILY DESIGNATE RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL
6:29:55PM AND HOPE IT WORKS.
6:29:56PM YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE MARKET ABSORPTION.
6:29:58PM YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE MARKET CATERING, TOO.
6:29:59PM YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE TRAFFIC PATTERNS.
6:30:02PM YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE ROADWAY SYSTEM, AND YOU HAVE TO LOOK
6:30:04PM AT HOW IT RELATES TO THE COMMUNITY.
6:30:06PM THESE ARE NOT APARTMENTS, COUNCIL.
6:30:08PM THESE ARE FEE SIMPLE CONDOMINIUMS, OWNER OCCUPIED.
6:30:11PM PEOPLE THAT WANT TO INVEST IN PALMETTO BEACH THAT DON'T WANT
6:30:16PM A DETACHED HOUSE, DON'T WANT A LOT TO MAINTAIN.
6:30:19PM THIS IS THE FIRST MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN PALMETTO
6:30:22PM BEACH.
6:30:23PM YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE PALMETTO
6:30:25PM BEACH COMMUNITY IN STRONG SUPPORT THAT THIS IS WHAT THIS
6:30:30PM COMMUNITY NEEDS.
6:30:30PM THIS IS THE RIGHT PROJECT AT THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT
6:30:33PM TIME.
6:30:33PM THIS IS NOT HYDE PARK.
6:30:36PM THIS IS NOT SOHO.
6:30:40PM THIS IS NOT PALMA CEIA.
6:30:42PM I DON'T THINK I'D STAND BEFORE YOU WITH A PARKING REDUCTION
6:30:44PM OF 24% FOR A SOHO PROJECT.
6:30:49PM I DON'T THINK I'D EVEN REPRESENT IT.
6:30:51PM THIS PROJECT WORKS.
6:30:51PM AGAIN, ACCESS NORTH AND SOUTH.
6:30:54PM SECONDARY ACCESS TO MAPLE TO NORTHWEST.
6:30:56PM COMMERCIAL HAS BEEN PULLED TO THE FRONT, SO ZERO SETBACK.
6:30:57PM WE HAVE TO RAISE ELEVATION FOR THE MINIMUM FLOODPLAIN, SO
6:31:01PM YOU WALK UP TO THIS BUILDING.
6:31:04PM YOU HAVE OUTSIDE TABLES.
6:31:05PM YOU HAVE ABOVE DECK.
6:31:06PM YOU HAVE A COURTYARD IN THE CENTER.
6:31:09PM YOU HAVE BUILDING UNITS WRAPPING AROUND THIS PROJECT AND
6:31:13PM THEN THREE-STORY CONDO, BALCONIES, NORTH, EAST, SOUTH.
6:31:18PM THIS IS A SMALL RETENTION POND AS A BUFFER TO THE NORTHWEST.
6:31:21PM MARY WENT THROUGH THE ELEVATION BUT I'LL JUST HIGHLIGHT.
6:31:25PM THIS IS THE FACADE.
6:31:26PM THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE ON 22nd STREET.
6:31:29PM THIS IS UNINTERRUPTED BUT IT'S BROKEN UP IN ARCHITECTURAL
6:31:32PM STANDARDS.
6:31:33PM WE'VE GONE THROUGH STEPHANIE GAINES IS OUR ARCHITECT.
6:31:37PM SHE DID A HECK OF A JOB ON THIS DESIGN.
6:31:39PM YOU CAN SEE THE STAIRWAYS WALKING UP, THE LITTLE ABOVE STORY
6:31:43PM DECK.
6:31:44PM 6500 SQUARE FEET WHICH I WOULD POINT OUT IS ONLY 15,000
6:31:48PM SQUARE FEET OVER THE EXISTING STONEY'S.
6:31:50PM IN FACT, THE PARKING ON STONEY'S IS AROUND 10 TO 12 SPACES.
6:31:54PM STONEY'S IS JUST ABOUT 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
6:31:57PM UNDER THE CODE TODAY, YOU COULD NOT BUILD STONEY'S.
6:32:00PM I'M HERE TO TELL YOU STONEY'S DID JUST FINE FOR 40, 50
6:32:04PM YEARS.
6:32:04PM IT WOULD HAVE REQUIRED A 50% PARKING REDUCTION IF IT WERE
6:32:08PM BUILT TODAY.
6:32:08PM THIS PROJECT TAKES DOWN STONEY'S BUT REPLACES IT WITH GROUND
6:32:12PM FLOOR RETAIL THAT RELATES DIRECTLY TO THE PEDESTRIAN
6:32:15PM ACTIVITY ON 22nd STREET THAT WE HOPE TO ENCOURAGE.
6:32:18PM ON THE NORTH SIDE, THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH.
6:32:24PM THIS WOULD BE TO THE EAST.
6:32:25PM THIS IS TO THE WEST.
6:32:26PM YOU CAN SEE HOW THIS RELATES TO 22nd STREET.
6:32:29PM FIRST TIME, TABLES OUTSIDE.
6:32:31PM PEOPLE WANT TO BE OUTSIDE.
6:32:33PM THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE FIRST TIME -- YOU CAN HAVE
6:32:39PM OUTSIDE SITTING AREAS AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
6:32:42PM AND THEN THE BALCONIES ABOVE.
6:32:44PM THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE.
6:32:45PM SO THIS WOULD BE ON OAKWOOD LOOKING NORTH.
6:32:49PM AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE ON THE SOUTH SIDE, STEPS WALKING UP BOTH
6:32:52PM SIDES.
6:32:53PM THIS IS OUR MESH VENTILATION AREA TO SCREEN THE PARKING AND
6:32:57PM ONLY ONE DRIVEWAY TO OAKWOOD.
6:32:58PM COUNCIL, WE HAVE FILED FOR THE WAIVERS BECAUSE WE DIDN'T
6:33:23PM HAVE A CHOICE TO MAKE THIS PROJECT WORK.
6:33:26PM WE DON'T TAKE THESE WAIVERS LIGHTLY.
6:33:29PM WE GET IT.
6:33:29PM I THOUGHT MARY'S REPORT WHEN I INITIALLY READ IT WAS A
6:33:33PM LITTLE STRONG.
6:33:34PM I E-MAILED HER MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE WORDING OF IT.
6:33:37PM WE BROKE BREAD.
6:33:38PM I THINK WE'RE GOOD.
6:33:39PM I UNDERSTAND SHE IS THE QUINTESSENTIAL PROFESSIONAL.
6:33:41PM BUT ANY OTHER PLACE, 24% PARKING REDUCTION MAY NOT BE DEEMED
6:33:46PM REASONABLE.
6:33:47PM IN THIS COMMUNITY, IT'S QUITE REASONABLE.
6:33:49PM WE ALREADY HAVE A 50% PARKING REDUCTION ON THE STONEY'S
6:33:52PM SITE.
6:33:53PM WE ARE SIMPLY ASKING FOR ABOUT A 50% DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT
6:33:56PM OF PARKING FOR THE UNITS AND ABOUT 50% DISTRIBUTION TO THE
6:34:00PM 6500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL.
6:34:02PM REMEMBER, THESE ARE NOT LARGE UNITS.
6:34:05PM THESE ARE URBAN STUDIOS.
6:34:08PM ONLY FIVE OF THESE ARE THREE BEDROOM.
6:34:11PM ALL THE REST ARE 600 SQUARE FOOT TO ABOUT 1700 SQUARE FOOT
6:34:15PM MAX.
6:34:15PM MOST ARE ONE BEDROOM AND TWO BEDROOM ONLY.
6:34:18PM SO IF YOU HAVE LOTS OF KIDS, IF YOU HAVE FOUR CARS AND A
6:34:22PM PRIVATE COLLECTION, THIS IS NOT THE DEVELOPMENT FOR YOU.
6:34:24PM WE HAVE CATERED THIS DEVELOPMENT, CATERED THIS DESIGN SOLELY
6:34:28PM FOR THE UP-AND-COMING NEW RESIDENTS OF PALMETTO BEACH WHO
6:34:33PM WANT TO EXPERIENCE THE URBAN LIFESTYLE THAT HERETOFORE HAS
6:34:39PM NOT BEEN AVAILABLE, AND HOPEFULLY WE PROPOSE ADDITIONALLY ON
6:34:40PM OUR 5.2 ACRES IN THE FUTURE.
6:34:40PM THE OPEN SPACE, THERE'S NO QUESTION THAT STAFF HAS NOTED THE
6:34:48PM DISCREPANCY, AND WE ARE SHY OF THE 350 SQUARE FEET.
6:34:52PM COUNCIL, I'VE ALWAYS HAD CONCERN ABOUT THE STANDARDIZED
6:34:56PM IMPOSITION OF THAT OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.
6:34:58PM IT IS NOT SENSITIVE TO THE SIZE OF THE UNITS.
6:35:01PM IT'S NOT SENSITIVE TO THE NUMBER OF THE BEDROOMS.
6:35:05PM 350 SQUARE FEET REGARDLESS DOING 500-SQUARE-FOOT FLAT OR
6:35:09PM 3500-SQUARE-FOOT PENTHOUSE.
6:35:11PM I THINK THAT RESULTS IN A DISPROPORTION OF IMPACT ON THE
6:35:16PM OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS.
6:35:17PM SO WE ARE UNDER THAT 350 SQUARE FEET.
6:35:20PM WE HAVE TO DO THE PAY FEE IN LIEU.
6:35:22PM MY CLIENT ACCEPTS THAT.
6:35:24PM NO ONE IS COMING HERE TO SWIM.
6:35:27PM NO CLUBHOUSE, NO TOT LOT NO PLAYGROUND.
6:35:32PM MAXIMIZE THE SPACE TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE WHILE
6:35:34PM MAINTAINING THE BUFFERS AROUND THE PROJECT AND WE HAVE THE
6:35:36PM OPEN SPACE AS PART OF OUR RETENTION POND.
6:35:38PM MY FEELING IS, IF THE RECREATION NEEDS ARE FOREMOST IN THE
6:35:42PM MINDS OF THE TENANTS, THIS COMMUNITY IS A PLAY, IS A
6:35:47PM RECREATION, BIKING, WALKING.
6:35:49PM YOU HAVE DESOTO PARK.
6:35:50PM YOU HAVE THE BERMUDA BOULEVARD SIDE.
6:35:54PM WE DON'T THINK THE REDUCTION IN OPEN SPACE IS CRITICAL FOR
6:35:54PM THE NEEDS OF THIS COMMUNITY.
6:35:54PM IT'S CRITICAL FOR DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT.
6:35:54PM I WOULD JUST ASK YOU, I'LL CLOSE WITH THE PLANNING
6:36:00PM COMMISSION COMMENT.
6:36:02PM I THINK THEY HAD A MOST FORWARD-LOOKING REVIEW.
6:36:07PM IF YOU GO TO THE STAFF ANALYSIS -- AND I'LL READ THE
6:36:09PM EXCERPT.
6:36:09PM THIS IS ON PAGE 5.
6:36:12PM APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REVITALIZATION
6:36:15PM OF VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITE IN THE PALMETTO BEACH
6:36:19PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:36:19PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OVER
6:36:22PM SINGLE USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
6:36:23PM THIS PD IS PROPOSING MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, A RESTAURANT
6:36:27PM AND SHOPPING.
6:36:28PM THIS WILL PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES TO THE SURROUNDING
6:36:30PM NEIGHBORHOOD AND FURTHER POLICY DIRECTION OF THE
6:36:33PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
6:36:33PM COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE'VE WORKED HARD ON THIS.
6:36:37PM WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY FOR OVER SIX MONTHS
6:36:41PM BEYOND.
6:36:41PM I THINK WE'VE EARNED BOTH THEIR RESPECT AND SUPPORT ON THIS.
6:36:45PM THIS IS, AGAIN, THE RIGHT PROJECT AT THE RIGHT TIME.
6:36:47PM WE THINK THE RIGHT LOCATION.
6:36:48PM IT IS THE FRONT DOOR TO OUR 5.2-ACRE TRACT WE HOPE WE'LL
6:36:52PM BRING ONLINE IN THE NEXT YEAR.
6:36:53PM WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
6:36:58PM I'LL HAVE KEFIR NORRIS MAKE A FEW COMMENTS AND THEN OPEN IT
6:37:01PM UP FOR QUESTIONS.
6:37:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: TWO MEMBERS WANT TO ASK QUESTIONS.
6:37:05PM DO YOU WANT TO ASK QUESTIONS BEFORE THIS GENTLEMAN COMES UP?
6:37:07PM OKAY.
6:37:08PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
6:37:11PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU SAID YOU HAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
6:37:15PM I KNOW THAT NEIGHBORHOOD VERY WELL.
6:37:18PM YOU HAVE A LOT OF OLDER RESIDENTS WHO HAVE BEEN THERE A
6:37:24PM LONG, LONG TIME.
6:37:25PM I DID RECEIVE SOME PHONE CALLS AND AN E-MAIL ABOUT THREE OR
6:37:29PM FOUR WEEKS AGO ABOUT THE PROJECT AND ABOUT SOME CONCERNS.
6:37:35PM I SEE YOU HAVE A LETTER IN HERE OF SUPPORT.
6:37:38PM THIS IS FROM A FEW BOARD MEMBERS OR IS THIS FROM THE WHOLE
6:37:40PM COMMUNITY?
6:37:41PM BECAUSE I'M KIND OF CONFUSED WHEN I GOT SOME CALLS ABOUT THE
6:37:44PM PROJECT.
6:37:45PM I HAVE A LETTER HERE FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHICH I
6:37:52PM KNOW THEY ONLY MEET ONCE A YEAR OVER THERE.
6:37:54PM I'M JUST WONDERING, TELL ME HOW THAT CONNECTION IS.
6:37:57PM I'M KIND OF LOST ON THAT.
6:37:58PM >> I'M GOING TO DEFER TO THE AUTHOR OF THAT LETTER.
6:38:01PM I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY.
6:38:03PM I DID NOT WRITE THAT LETTER.
6:38:06PM IT WAS WRITTEN BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PALMETTO BEACH
6:38:09PM ASSOCIATION.
6:38:09PM YOU CAN HEAR FROM HER DIRECTLY OR WAIT UNTIL THE COMMENTS
6:38:12PM LATER.
6:38:13PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: HEAR FROM HER NOW.
6:38:17PM >> JENNIFER, IF YOU WANT TO APPROACH.
6:38:19PM >>LUIS VIERA: THIS INDIVIDUAL COMING UP, IS SHE WITH THE
6:38:22PM NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OR -- OKAY.
6:38:24PM WELL, WERE YOU GOING TO COME UP DURING PUBLIC COMMENT.
6:38:28PM >> YES.
6:38:29PM >>LUIS VIERA: CAN WE WAIT DURING PUBLIC COMMENT?
6:38:33PM JUST TO NOT MIX EVERYTHING.
6:38:36PM KEEP EVERYTHING NICE AND SMOOTH.
6:38:38PM >> WE HAD A NEIGHBORHOOD REACH OUT, COUNCILMAN.
6:38:41PM WE HAVE MET WITH NEIGHBORS.
6:38:42PM THERE IS A GENTLEMAN HERE ALSO THAT IS ADJACENT ABUTTING
6:38:46PM NEIGHBOR IN SUPPORT.
6:38:47PM WE THOUGHT WE WOULD HAVE MORE PEOPLE COMING.
6:38:49PM THOUGHT IT WOULD BE HEARD LATER.
6:38:51PM AS THE CPA DEMONSTRATED, A MAJORITY OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS
6:38:55PM STRONGLY IN SUPPORT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.
6:39:02PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: [MICROPHONE NOT ON]
6:39:05PM -- TO THE PARKING WAIVER.
6:39:10PM SPECIFICALLY, SO WE'VE GOT A MIXED ENVIRONMENT IN THE
6:39:13PM PARKING GARAGE IN TERMS OF I WOULD ASSUME RETAIL CUSTOMERS
6:39:19PM AS WELL AS RESIDENTS.
6:39:20PM SO WILL THERE BE DESIGNATED -- IF I BUY A CONDO, DO I HAVE A
6:39:28PM DESIGNATED SPACE OR TWO THAT GOES WITH THE CONDO?
6:39:33PM IF THAT'S THE CASE, HOW DO THESE X NUMBER OF SPACES, WHAT IS
6:39:37PM IT, 62 SPACES THAT WILL BE BUILT, HOW WILL THEY BE SHARED
6:39:40PM WITH THE RETAIL?
6:39:43PM MY BIGGEST CONCERN WOULD BE IF THERE'S NOT ENOUGH SPACE,
6:39:47PM LET'S SAY WILDLY SUCCESSFUL RESTAURANT THAT'S NOW
6:39:51PM OVERFLOWING INTO THE ADJACENT STREETS.
6:39:55PM >> GOOD QUESTION.
6:39:56PM THANKS, MR. DINGFELDER.
6:39:57PM WE WILL HAVE A GENERAL ASSIGNMENT, ONE PARKING SPACE PER
6:40:02PM UNIT.
6:40:03PM THE FIVE THREE-BEDROOM UNITS WILL HAVE A FRACTIONAL MORE,
6:40:08PM FEW ADDITIONAL SPACES FOR THEIR PARKING NEEDS.
6:40:10PM THE BALANCE OF THOSE PARKING ARE ALLOCATED TO THE RESTAURANT
6:40:14PM AND TO THE RETAIL WHICH WILL HAVE COMPETING HOURS.
6:40:16PM WHEN THE PEOPLE ARE WORKING, THE RETAIL WILL BE OPEN.
6:40:18PM THEY COME BACK, THE RETAIL WILL BE CLOSED.
6:40:21PM MY GUESS IN TALKING WITH THE NEIGHBORS AS WELL AS THE
6:40:25PM COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP, I THINK ABOUT HALF OF THE RESTAURANT,
6:40:27PM WHICH IS GOING TO BE THE HIGHEST ACTIVITY IS PROBABLY GOING
6:40:31PM TO BE SERVICED BY RIDE SHARE, LYFT, UBER, RIDE SHARING IN
6:40:36PM THE COMMUNITY.
6:40:37PM NEIGHBORS GOING TO DINNER AND DRINKS, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO
6:40:42PM DRIVE FIVE CARS.
6:40:43PM THEY'LL DRIVE ONE CAR.
6:40:44PM THIS COMMUNITY WALKS, RIDES BIKES, AND DOES THE RIDE SHARE
6:40:48PM VERY WELL.
6:40:49PM WE'VE HAD THAT DISCUSSION.
6:40:50PM WE VETTED THAT.
6:40:51PM WE ALSO SAID, IS THIS ENOUGH PARKING FOR YOU?
6:40:53PM WE DON'T WANT TO OVERLOAD THE COMMUNITY AND THE SIDE
6:40:56PM STREETS.
6:40:57PM WE HAVE LOTS OF PARKING OPPORTUNITIES AROUND.
6:40:59PM IF THERE'S ANYTHING WE CAN DO IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IT'S ADD
6:41:02PM ADDITIONAL CARS BECAUSE THERE'S NOT MUCH TRAFFIC AND NOT
6:41:06PM MUCH LAND USE --
6:41:07PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RELATED TO THE 31 DWELLING UNITS, I GUESS
6:41:11PM I WAS CONFUSED BY YOUR OPENING STATEMENT, THAT'S 31 PARKING
6:41:15PM SPACES THAT WILL BE BLOCKED OFF, RESIDENTS ONLY OR --
6:41:19PM >> CORRECT.
6:41:21PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THEN THE BALANCE FOR THE GENERAL
6:41:25PM RETAIL, SLASH, RESTAURANT.
6:41:28PM >> THAT'S RIGHT.
6:41:29PM I'LL HAVE MR. NORRIS COME UP BRIEFLY AND ADDRESS HIS ISSUES.
6:41:34PM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
6:41:37PM THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
6:41:44PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: [MICROPHONE NOT ON]
6:41:46PM -- THAT IS AT THE HEARING.
6:41:51PM THIS BEING A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER, THAT MEANS YOU'RE
6:41:56PM REQUIRED TO AVOID ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF THE HEARING THAT WOULD
6:42:05PM PERHAPS AFFECT YOUR DECISION THAT HAS NOT BEEN DISCLOSED TO
6:42:08PM THE PETITIONER OR OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES.
6:42:11PM SO THAT BEING SAID, AND I'M SURE WE'LL GET INTO THIS MORE
6:42:15PM WHEN WE HAVE OUR WORKSHOP UPCOMING NEXT WEEK AT 1:30 IN THE
6:42:20PM AFTERNOON, BUT WHAT HAPPENS IS WHEN YOU GET SOMETHING IN
6:42:23PM WRITING, THAT MAKES ITS WAY INTO THE CLERK'S FILE, WHICH IS
6:42:28PM ABLE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PETITIONER AND ALL THE INTERESTED
6:42:31PM PARTIES TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES.
6:42:33PM AND WHAT HAPPENS IS, I USUALLY ASK, AND WE RECEIVE AND FILE
6:42:38PM DURING THE COURSE OF THE HEARING, WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
6:42:40PM THAT ARE RELATIVE TO TONIGHT'S HEARINGS THAT HAVE BEEN
6:42:43PM AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN CITY COUNCIL'S OFFICE.
6:42:45PM ALSO, COUNCIL, SOMETIMES YOU MAY RECEIVE PHONE CALLS OR
6:42:49PM PEOPLE MAY WISH TO APPROACH YOU.
6:42:52PM IF YOU DO CHOOSE TO ENGAGE THEM, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
6:42:56PM TO BRING THAT CONVERSATION FORWARD AT THE HEARING TO ALLOW
6:43:02PM THE INTERESTED PARTIES, THE PETITIONER IN PARTICULAR, TO
6:43:06PM HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO KNOW WHAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED AND TO
6:43:13PM HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS IT.
6:43:13PM SO, COUNCIL, I AM GOING TO ASK THAT IF ANY MEMBERS OF
6:43:15PM COUNCIL HAVE HAD ANY VERBAL COMMUNICATION WITH ANY
6:43:18PM PETITIONER, HIS OR HER REPRESENTATIVE, OR ANY MEMBER OF THE
6:43:21PM PUBLIC IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OF TONIGHT'S HEARINGS THAT
6:43:23PM THAT MEMBER OF COUNCIL SHOULD, PRIOR TO TAKING ACTION AND
6:43:26PM GIVING THE PETITIONER AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THAT,
6:43:28PM DISCLOSE THE FOLLOWING:
6:43:30PM THE PERSON OR PERSONS, GROUP OR ENTITY WITH WHOM THE VERBAL
6:43:34PM COMMUNICATION OCCURRED AND THE SUBSTANCE OF THAT VERBAL
6:43:37PM COMMUNICATION.
6:43:38PM SO PLEASE BE MINDFUL OF HAVING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
6:43:44PM OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
6:43:44PM AND IF FOR WHATEVER REASON THAT DOES TAKE PLAYER, PLEASE BE
6:43:48PM MINDFUL OF THE REQUIREMENT UNDER FLORIDA LAW, BOTH STATUTE
6:43:53PM AND CASE LAW, THAT REQUIRES THAT THAT BE DISCLOSED.
6:43:56PM THANK YOU.
6:43:58PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY.
6:44:01PM >> MY NAME IS KEEFER NORRIS.
6:44:02PM I REPRESENT CTV HERE ON THIS PROJECT.
6:44:05PM I WANT TO BE BRIEF HERE.
6:44:06PM I JUST WANT TO MENTION THAT THIS IS A UNIQUE PROJECT AND HOW
6:44:10PM MUCH PALMETTO BEACH NEEDS THIS TO OCCUR, AND THAT THERE'S
6:44:15PM 2,000 RESIDENTS THERE.
6:44:17PM I WANT TO MAKE ONE CORRECTION.
6:44:19PM WE ARE KEEPING THIS AS APARTMENTS.
6:44:21PM THESE AREN'T FOR-SALE CONDOS.
6:44:23PM HE'S MIXING THAT UP WITH THE OTHER PROJECT.
6:44:25PM THAT BEING SAID, WE'RE KEEPING THESE AS APARTMENTS.
6:44:28PM WE'RE KEEPING THE RETAIL, AND SO WE ARE COMMITTED TO BEING
6:44:31PM INVOLVED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THE LONG TERM.
6:44:33PM WE DO NEED THE PARKING WAIVER IN ORDER TO BRING SOMETHING
6:44:38PM THIS UNIQUE TO THE AREA, YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF
6:44:42PM DENSITY AS A DEVELOPER TO MAKE IT WORK.
6:44:45PM WE FEEL THAT THE RETAIL OFFICE THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE
6:44:48PM FIRST FLOOR WILL BE DOCTORS, DENTISTS, VERIZON-TYPE THINGS.
6:44:53PM THEY ARE NOT HIGH USE.
6:44:54PM HOURS FROM 8 TO 5.
6:44:56PM THE RESTAURANT WILL PROBABLY BE 11 TO 8 OR 11 TO 9.
6:45:00PM SO THE HOURS THAT THE PARKING IS GOING TO BE USED WILL BE
6:45:04PM CONDUCIVE TO THE EXTRA 30 SPACES WILL BE FLEXIBLE ENOUGH
6:45:09PM THAT IT WORKS FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE USING THIS
6:45:13PM FACILITY.
6:45:13PM I'LL BE BRIEF BECAUSE I ONLY HAVE TWO SECONDS.
6:45:15PM I APPRECIATE AND I HOPE THAT YOU TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE
6:45:18PM COMMUNITY SUPPORT WE HAVE BEHIND THIS AND THAT YOU DO
6:45:21PM APPROVE THIS PROJECT.
6:45:23PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
6:45:24PM THANK YOU.
6:45:25PM ANYONE HERE FROM THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT ON ITEMS 1 OR 7?
6:45:29PM PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME.
6:45:31PM PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
6:45:34PM ANYONE ELSE HERE TO COMMENT ON ITEMS 1 AND 7?
6:45:38PM GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
6:45:39PM >> GOOD EVENING.
6:45:39PM JENNIFER WELLMAN.
6:45:40PM MY ADDRESS IS 2426 STUART STREET IN TAMPA.
6:45:44PM I'M THE PRESIDENT OF THE PALMETTO BEACH COMMUNITY
6:45:48PM ASSOCIATION, GOING ON TEN YEARS NOW.
6:45:51PM AND I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF BOTH OF THESE APPLICATIONS.
6:45:55PM AS COUNCILMAN GUDES HAD INDICATED, WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE
6:45:59PM REGULAR MEETINGS NOW.
6:46:01PM THIS YEAR WE'RE MEETING QUARTERLY.
6:46:04PM WE HAD A GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING ON MAY 21st, AND I
6:46:10PM RESUBMITTED THIS LETTER I HAD E-MAILED AND COPIED THE CLERK,
6:46:15PM HOPING THAT WAS THE PROPER WAY TO DO IT.
6:46:17PM I WANTED YOU TO HAVE TIME TO LOOK AT MY LETTER BEFORE
6:46:20PM TONIGHT.
6:46:20PM BUT OUR MEETING WAS ON MAY 21st.
6:46:24PM CTV CAPITAL DID COME TO THE MEETING TO PRESENT THE PLANS FOR
6:46:27PM THE REZONING AND THE VACATING APPLICATIONS.
6:46:29PM THE MEETING WAS WELL ATTENDED.
6:46:31PM AND THE PLANS WERE VERY WELL RECEIVED.
6:46:35PM WE DID ANNOUNCE THE DATE OF THE HEARING TONIGHT IN CASE
6:46:39PM SOMEBODY DID WANT TO COME AND PROVIDE COMMENTS.
6:46:42PM WE HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING UP WITH RESIDENTS TO UNDERSTAND IF
6:46:45PM THERE ARE ANY CONCERNS.
6:46:47PM I ACTUALLY MET WITH TOM AND TERRY REYNOLDS WHO MIGHT HAVE
6:46:52PM BEEN THE PEOPLE WHO ORLANDO GUDES HAD MET WITH PREVIOUSLY.
6:46:58PM I FOLLOWED UP WITH THEM TO SEE IF THERE WERE ANY OUTSTANDING
6:47:02PM CONCERNS AND THERE WERE NOT.
6:47:04PM WE OFFERED TO HAVE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE APPLICANT
6:47:06PM AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WERE NOT CONCERNED WITH HAVING
6:47:10PM ADDITIONAL MEETINGS.
6:47:11PM SO OUR TAKE ON IT FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND THERE ARE
6:47:15PM SEVERAL MEMBERS ON OUR BOARD.
6:47:18PM ALL SEVEN DID VOTE UNANIMOUSLY IN SUPPORT OF THESE
6:47:23PM APPLICATIONS AND WE DO TAKE THE RESIDENTS' CONCERNS INTO
6:47:27PM ACCOUNT WHEN WE VOTE ON THESE ISSUES.
6:47:30PM WE BELIEVE THAT THE PROPOSED USES ARE APPROPRIATE AND THE
6:47:33PM BUILDING ELEVATIONS REFLECT VERY HIGH-QUALITY DESIGN THAT WE
6:47:37PM SUPPORT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE REALLY NEED THIS TYPE OF
6:47:40PM PROJECT.
6:47:40PM THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN OUR
6:47:43PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:47:44PM WE DON'T OPPOSE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
6:47:47PM THE POINT OF A PD IS TO ALLOW FOR SOME WAIVERS TO THE LAND
6:47:52PM DEVELOPMENT CODE.
6:47:53PM OTHERWISE, THEY WOULD DEVELOP UNDER THE STRAIGHT ZONING
6:47:56PM DISTRICT.
6:47:56PM SO WE UNDERSTAND WAIVERS ARE SOMETIMES NEEDED IN A PLANNED
6:47:59PM DEVELOPMENT.
6:48:00PM ACCESS TO THE SITE FROM THE SIDE STREETS ARE NECESSARY TO
6:48:02PM MAINTAIN THAT PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED FEEL ON 22nd STREET TO
6:48:07PM NOT HAVE A DRIVEWAY OFF 22nd STREET IS A GOOD THING, WE
6:48:11PM BELIEVE.
6:48:11PM AND THE WAIVER TO REDUCE PARKING IS ACCEPTABLE. WE KNOW
6:48:16PM THAT A LOT OF PATRONS WILL USE -- THAT WILL USE THE
6:48:21PM COMMERCIAL USES WILL COME ON FOOT OR BICYCLE AND THAT SMALL
6:48:26PM URBAN SITES MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE GREENSPACE AND
6:48:29PM BUFFERS AND THE TREE PLANTING AREAS, BUT WE KNOW RESIDENTS
6:48:32PM WILL USE DESOTO PARK FOR THEIR RECREATION NEEDS.
6:48:35PM SO WE DO SUPPORT THIS PROJECT, AND WE HOPE YOU'LL APPROVE
6:48:37PM IT.
6:48:37PM THANK YOU.
6:48:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM.
6:48:39PM ANYBODY ELSE -- GO AHEAD, SIR.
6:48:44PM >> MY NAME IS JOHN HINDEN.
6:48:49PM 2014 OAKWOOD AVENUE.
6:48:50PM I LIVE RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WE'VE
6:48:53PM BEEN SPEAKING ABOUT.
6:48:55PM I SPOKE TO MR. KEEFER HERE ABOUT THE PROJECT OVER THE LAST
6:48:59PM FEW WEEKS, AND WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.
6:49:02PM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
6:49:05PM IT'S UNDERUTILIZED.
6:49:07PM IT'S A PERFECT PLACE IN ACCOMPANIMENT WITH THE CHANNELSIDE
6:49:11PM DISTRICT AND ALL THAT'S HAPPENING DOWN THERE.
6:49:13PM I THINK IT WOULD REALLY IMPROVE OUR LIVES THERE, TO HAVE A
6:49:17PM RESTAURANT WE COULD WALK TO, TO BE ABLE TO RELAX IN OUR
6:49:20PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:49:21PM RIGHT NOW, THERE'S NOTHING LIKE THIS.
6:49:23PM AND EVERYONE THAT I'VE TALKED TO UP AND DOWN THE STREETS,
6:49:26PM THEY'VE ALL SAID THAT THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED IN HAVING
6:49:28PM THIS PROJECT GO THROUGH.
6:49:30PM I NEED SOMEWHERE TO DRINK BEER.
6:49:32PM [ LAUGHTER ]
6:49:33PM REALLY.
6:49:36PM IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE SOMEWHERE WE CAN WALK TO.
6:49:39PM WHAT KIND DO I WANT?
6:49:41PM TOTALLY 100% IN SUPPORT OF IT.
6:49:50PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
6:49:51PM ANYONE ELSE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS 1 AND 7?
6:49:58PM DO YOU WANT ANY REBUTTAL?
6:50:00PM >> THANKS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
6:50:01PM YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT STATES FOR ITSELF.
6:50:05PM MS. WELLMAN'S PRESENTATION AND THE NEIGHBOR TO THE WEST.
6:50:08PM I THINK THE BIGGEST KICK I GOT OUT OF TALKING TO MARY
6:50:11PM SAMANIEGO.
6:50:11PM SHE DID A FIELD CHECK AND SHE CAME BACK AND SAID, "THIS IS A
6:50:15PM VERY SLEEPY COMMUNITY."
6:50:16PM IT'S TIME FOR THIS COMMUNITY TO BE WOKEN UP.
6:50:19PM THE CURRENT ZONING COMP PLAN DESIGNATIONS DO THIS AND
6:50:23PM SEPARATE.
6:50:24PM WE'RE TRYING TO INTEGRATE THE FIRST VERTICAL INTEGRATED LAND
6:50:27PM USE IN PALMETTO BEACH.
6:50:29PM WE'RE EXCITED.
6:50:30PM WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT.
6:50:31PM THANK YOU.
6:50:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
6:50:32PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU, THE YOUNG LADY
6:50:36PM WHO CAME UP FROM THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
6:50:38PM I REMEMBER THAT, ABOUT 16, 17 YEARS AGO, THREE MAYORS BACK,
6:50:43PM YOU HAD YOUR CIVIC CENTER REDONE.
6:50:49PM THAT WAS A LONG TIME AGO.
6:50:50PM IN FACT, I USED TO PLAY BALL AT DESOTO PARK, BUT I DIDN'T
6:50:54PM LIVE THERE.
6:50:55PM I LIVED NEAR CUSCADEN PARK.
6:50:57PM WE PLAYED YOUR TEAM.
6:50:59PM WHAT I LIKED ABOUT THAT AREA IS THE LEFT FIELD, THERE WAS NO
6:51:03PM FENCE, AND IT WAS SO FAR BACK THAT I LOVED TO PITCH THERE
6:51:08PM BECAUSE NOBODY COULD HIT THE WATER, AND I WAS A BAD PITCHER.
6:51:11PM I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT.
6:51:12PM I APPRECIATE THE KNOWLEDGE.
6:51:13PM I REMEMBER ALL THE LITTLE DRUGSTORES YOU HAD AND REMEMBER
6:51:16PM THE NEIGHBORS THAT YOU HAD, THE HOUSES WERE KEPT UP PRETTY
6:51:19PM NICE.
6:51:20PM THEY WERE WOOD.
6:51:20PM YOU HAD SOME TWO-STORY BUILDINGS ON STUART STREET ON THE
6:51:25PM EAST SIDE, AND IT WAS A NICE NEIGHBORHOOD TO LIVE IN.
6:51:28PM AND LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE, IT SOMETIMES FALLS APART TO SOME
6:51:32PM DEGREE.
6:51:32PM HOPEFULLY YOU CAN GET IT BACK TOGETHER.
6:51:34PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
6:51:35PM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:51:37PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I REMEMBER HAVING BREAKFAST WITH A GOOD
6:51:40PM FRIEND OF MINE IN YBOR CITY AND HE ASKED ME, WHERE IS THIS
6:51:44PM PLACE YOU TALK ABOUT, PALMETTO BEACH?
6:51:46PM AND HE'D NEVER BEEN TO IT.
6:51:48PM HE KNOWS YBOR, BUT HE NEVER CROSSED, YOU KNOW, WENT DOWN THE
6:51:52PM ROAD.
6:51:52PM I SHOWED IT TO HIM, THE SPICOLA FAMILY POOL AND THE
6:51:56PM WATERFRONT AND WHATNOT.
6:51:57PM AND HE WAS BLOWN AWAY AT HOW BEAUTIFUL THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS.
6:52:01PM IT'S ONE OF TAMPA'S LAST UNTOUCHED JEWELS.
6:52:05PM IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN DOWN THERE, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO GO.
6:52:08PM THIS IS VERY POSITIVE.
6:52:09PM IT WILL LIFT UP THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:52:11PM BUT WHEN YOU SEE HOW NICE THIS WATERFRONT COMMUNITY IS, THIS
6:52:15PM HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD, I THINK YOU'LL BE JUST AS EXCITED AS
6:52:21PM MY FRIEND WAS WHEN HE SAW IT.
6:52:23PM I LOOK FORWARD TO SUPPORTING THIS.
6:52:24PM IT'S EXCITING, AND IT'S A NEW CHAPTER FOR PALMETTO BEACH AND
6:52:27PM THAT WHOLE AREA THAT IS WELL DESERVING OF THIS.
6:52:29PM THANK YOU.
6:52:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
6:52:31PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: WELL, I KNOW IT AS DESOTO.
6:52:36PM I THINK MOST OF THE PEOPLE -- THAT'S WHAT IT'S KNOWN AS
6:52:41PM DESOTO.
6:52:41PM DESOTO PARK.
6:52:42PM MY PROGRAM -- I'M RETIRED FROM THE PROGRAM, BUT THEY STILL
6:52:50PM THINK I'M IN CHARGE.
6:52:51PM NEW FOOTBALL PROGRAM DOWN AT THE PARK.
6:52:55PM WE'RE PUTTING A PROGRAM DOWN THERE.
6:52:57PM I KNOW THAT COMMUNITY NEEDS THINGS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE.
6:53:01PM A LOT OF YOUNG ADULTS, BUT TO MY EARLIER COMMENT, FOR THE
6:53:05PM RECORD, MY OFFICE DID RECEIVE A CALL TO GO DOWN IN REFERENCE
6:53:09PM TO THE PARK, THE CLEANUP, THE SEAWALL, THE MANGROVES.
6:53:14PM THEY TALKED ABOUT THE TRAFFIC.
6:53:15PM THEY DID TALK ABOUT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT.
6:53:17PM I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE PARTICULAR PROJECT AT THE TIME, BUT
6:53:22PM I KNOW THAT AREA IS STRIVING NOW.
6:53:25PM IT'S AN OLDER COMMUNITY.
6:53:27PM YOU'VE GOT SOME YOUNGER FOLKS THAT ARE MOVING IN.
6:53:29PM THE COMMUNITY NEEDS A WOW.
6:53:34PM THAT'S THE TERM IN THE COMMUNITIES, A WOW.
6:53:38PM PEOPLE DON'T LIKE TO DRIVE AND TRAVEL FOR THE WOW
6:53:43PM EXPERIENCE.
6:53:44PM I THINK IT WILL BE A GOOD THING.
6:53:45PM A LOT OF YOUNG PARENTS.
6:53:47PM WE HOPE THE FOOTBALL PROGRAM WILL GROW WITH THE COMMUNITY AS
6:53:49PM WELL.
6:53:49PM I THINK IT WILL PROBABLY BE A GOOD PROJECT.
6:53:52PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
6:53:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I'VE BEEN WITH THE ROUGH RIDERS NOW FOR
6:53:58PM ALMOST, GOODNESS, ALMOST 30 YEARS.
6:54:00PM IT'S ALWAYS NICE TO GO TO YBOR CITY, BUT SOMETIMES YOU JUST
6:54:04PM DON'T WANT TO FIGHT THE TRAFFIC.
6:54:06PM DON'T WANT TO HAVE TO FIND A PARKING SPACE.
6:54:09PM CONGRATULATIONS TO THE COMMUNITY AND THE DEVELOPERS FOR
6:54:12PM WORKING TOGETHER TO BRING THIS TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT NOT
6:54:15PM ONLY LIVING, RETAIL, BUT RESTAURANT.
6:54:19PM I LOOK FORWARD TO BEING OPEN NIGHT AT ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS
6:54:21PM THERE AFTER I LEAVE THE CLUBHOUSE FOR THE ROUGH RIDERS.
6:54:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
6:54:26PM ANYONE ELSE?
6:54:27PM OKAY.
6:54:30PM DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
6:54:32PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:54:33PM A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
6:54:35PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:54:36PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:54:37PM COUNCILMAN CARLSON, DO YOU, SIR, MIND TAKING ITEM NUMBER 1?
6:54:45PM >>BILL CARLSON: FILE NUMBER VAC 19-10, ORDINANCE BEING
6:54:50PM PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
6:54:52PM AN ORDINANCE VACATING, CLOSING, DISCONTINUING AND ABANDONING
6:54:54PM A RIGHT-OF-WAY/PORTION OF ALLEYWAY LOCATED SOUTH OF MAPLE
6:54:58PM AVENUE, NORTH OF OAKWOOD AVENUE, EAST OF SOUTH 20th
6:55:01PM STREET, WEST OF SOUTH 22nd STREET IN EDGEWATER PARK, A
6:55:07PM SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,
6:55:09PM FLORIDA, THE SAME BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
6:55:13PM HEREOF, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN EASEMENT RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS,
6:55:16PM CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH
6:55:18PM HEREIN, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6:55:19PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
6:55:22PM A SECOND BY I BELIEVE MR. MIRANDA.
6:55:25PM BUT I'M NOT SURE.
6:55:27PM IN FAVOR?
6:55:28PM OPPOSED?
6:55:29PM NEXT, ITEM 7, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
6:55:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 7, FILE NUMBER REZ
6:55:38PM 19-32, MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
6:55:41PM CONSIDERATION.
6:55:41PM AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
6:55:44PM 2015 AND 2017 MAPLE AVENUE, 1305 SOUTH 22nd STREET AND
6:55:49PM 2020 OAKWOOD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE
6:55:53PM PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
6:55:55PM CLASSIFICATION RM-16 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY) AND CG
6:56:00PM (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
6:56:03PM RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, RESTAURANT AND STRIP SHOPPING
6:56:06PM CENTER WITH ALL CG USES); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6:56:10PM >> SECOND.
6:56:10PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MIRANDA, IF YOU COULD ALSO INCLUDE THE
6:56:13PM REVISION SHEET AS PART OF YOUR MOTION, PLEASE?
6:56:16PM THE REVISION SHEET.
6:56:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ALONG WITH THE REVISION SHEETS.
6:56:19PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
6:56:23PM I BELIEVE A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
6:56:25PM ALL IN FAVOR?
6:56:26PM ANY OPPOSED?
6:56:28PM >>THE CLERK: BOTH MOTIONS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6:56:30PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION TO BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
6:56:34PM 9:30 A.M.
6:56:36PM >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 3.
6:56:40PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
6:56:43PM ITEM NUMBER 3 IS PETITION NUMBER REZ 19-41.
6:56:47PM THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5818 SOUTH 6th STREET.
6:56:51PM THE REQUEST IS FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
6:56:55PM AND THE APPLICANT IS JOHN LUM AND STEVE MICHELINI.
6:57:02PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
6:57:04PM DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:57:06PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
6:57:07PM WITH THE SECOND CASE TONIGHT, WE MOVE DOWN TO THE SOUTH
6:57:11PM TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
6:57:12PM MORE SPECIFICALLY THE GANDY SUN BAY SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD.
6:57:18PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE.
6:57:23PM THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STATION IS .8 MILES TO THE WEST OVER ON
6:57:28PM SOUTH DALE MABRY.
6:57:30PM AND THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS SKYVIEW PARK,
6:57:34PM WHICH IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY .46 MILES TO THE SOUTH OF THE
6:57:37PM SUBJECT SITE.
6:57:39PM ON TO THE AERIAL, YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE IS ON
6:57:50PM 6th.
6:57:54PM AND THEN YOU'VE GOT MacDILL TO THE EAST.
6:57:56PM YOU CAN SEE FROM THE AERIAL THAT MacDILL HAS BEEN
6:57:59PM DEVELOPING OUT WITH A LOT OF TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS, BUT
6:58:03PM IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF MacDILL IS PREDOMINANTLY
6:58:09PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED WITH SOME LARGER VACANT LOTS.
6:58:13PM THERE IS SOME ADDITIONAL TOWNHOMES FURTHER WEST OF SHERIDAN.
6:58:21PM THERE'S ALSO COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY OCCURRING AT INTERBAY AND
6:58:24PM MacDILL AVENUE.
6:58:26PM ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, KIND OF BEARS OUT THAT
6:58:33PM PATTERN.
6:58:34PM AGAIN, HERE'S THE SUBJECT SITE.
6:58:37PM ALL THESE PROPERTIES WITHIN THIS KIND OF TAN COLOR I GUESS
6:58:43PM IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE.
6:58:46PM THERE YOU SEE THE INTENSITY OVER ON MacDILL.
6:58:50PM THAT PINK IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
6:58:54PM THEN YOU'VE GOT SOME SCATTERED RESIDENTIAL 20s AND ACTUAL
6:58:59PM RESIDENTIAL I BELIEVE 35 KIND OF TO THE NORTHEAST OF THIS.
6:59:02PM BUT THIS STREET IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN
6:59:06PM CHARACTER.
6:59:07PM YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THAT THIS PROPOSED
6:59:15PM REZONING THAT WOULD ALLOW TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES
6:59:19PM WOULD BE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THAT AREA
6:59:24PM PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
6:59:28PM THE EXISTING DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS FRONTING THIS
6:59:33PM BLOCK OF SOUTH 6th STREET IS 5.81 UNITS PER ACRE.
6:59:36PM THE PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF THOSE TWO
6:59:40PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE
6:59:43PM FOR AN OVERALL DENSITY OF THE PROPOSED REZONING AT 7.4 UNITS
6:59:47PM AN ACRE, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE
6:59:51PM LAND USE DESIGNATION.
6:59:54PM THE PROPOSED PD WILL BE OF SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT, AND SCALE
6:59:57PM OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
6:59:59PM LASTLY, THE PROPOSED PD IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT
7:00:02PM PATTERN AND DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10.
7:00:05PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
7:00:09PM FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS
7:00:13PM OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
7:00:20PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
7:00:23PM COUNCIL, AGAIN, THIS IS REZ 19-11.
7:00:26PM THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED RS-60.
7:00:29PM THE REQUEST IS FOR RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING.
7:00:34PM THIS REQUEST IS A EUCLIDEAN REQUEST FOR A EUCLIDEAN
7:00:40PM DISTRICT.
7:00:40PM THERE ARE NO WAIVERS ALLOWED WITH THIS REQUEST.
7:00:42PM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 100 BY 119 FOR A TOTAL
7:00:46PM LOT AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 12,000 SQUARE FEET.
7:00:49PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED NORTH OF WEST WYOMING AVENUE,
7:00:53PM SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST -- AND SOUTH 6th
7:00:58PM STREET.
7:00:58PM SURROUNDED BY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE
7:01:01PM NORTH, WEST, AND SOUTH AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES TO
7:01:04PM THE EAST.
7:01:05PM ON BAYSHORE OAKS DRIVE.
7:01:08PM SO THE PROPERTY CONTAINS ONE LOT, THAT'S LOT 6 IN THE SOUTH
7:01:13PM SIDE SUBDIVISION.
7:01:14PM AND THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR TWO LOTS WHICH MUST ADHERE
7:01:18PM TO THE RS 50 ZONING STANDARDS.
7:01:20PM THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP.
7:01:27PM THIS IS WHAT USED TO BE THE RED-BLUE MAP.
7:01:32PM THOSE, COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT MAY REMEMBER AND THE NEW
7:01:42PM MEMBERS, THIS WILL BE NEW FOR YOU.
7:01:44PM WE USED TO PRESENT THE MAP AND THE RED WOULD REPRESENT THE
7:01:46PM CONFORMING LOTS AND THEN THE BLUE WOULD REPRESENT THE
7:01:49PM NONCONFORMING LOTS.
7:01:51PM WHAT WE'VE DONE NOW IS ADDED SEVERAL DIFFERENT COLORS IN A
7:01:57PM VARIATION JUST TO SHOW THE DIFFERENCE IN THE WIDTH OF THE
7:02:01PM LOTS WITHIN THAT AREA.
7:02:03PM SO WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS AT THE TOP, THERE'S A LEGEND, AND
7:02:09PM THESE COLORS ARE ACTUALLY DIVIDED ON A RANGE OF FOUR FEET.
7:02:12PM SO THE BLUE THAT YOU SEE IS FOR LOTS THAT ARE 50 FEET TO
7:02:17PM LESS THAN 55 FEET.
7:02:18PM SO THAT WOULD BE 50 TO 54 FEET.
7:02:21PM IF THERE IS NOT A RANGE THERE THAT LOT WIDTH DOES NOT EXIST.
7:02:25PM AND THIS IS SHOWN, THIS IS THE PROPERTY HERE IN QUESTION,
7:02:29PM AND THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS STRIPED.
7:02:32PM THIS IS 6th STREET TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS MAP, AND THIS IS
7:02:36PM WYOMING.
7:02:37PM THIS IS PART OF A SEPARATE SUBDIVISION THAT IS THERE.
7:02:42PM SO THE OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDES THE MAJORITY OF
7:02:47PM SOUTHSIDE SUBDIVISION LOTS, WEST TO SOUTH SHERIDAN ROAD, TO
7:02:52PM WEST WYOMING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH.
7:02:54PM THE BAYSHORE OAKS LOTS WHICH ARE LOCATED TO THE EAST THEY
7:02:58PM WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STUDY AREA, AND THEY HAVE A PD
7:03:01PM ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
7:03:04PM THE LOTS TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ON SOUTH 6th STREET
7:03:08PM CONTAIN SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL IMMEDIATELY
7:03:11PM NORTH, HEADING NORTH TO WEST TYSON AVENUE.
7:03:14PM THE USES CHANGE TO SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
7:03:17PM WEST OF THE SITE, THE LOTS ARE DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY
7:03:19PM RESIDENTIAL.
7:03:20PM THE SITE IS ACTUALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTH SIDE SUBDIVISION.
7:03:26PM THE OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDED TOTAL OF 56 ZONING
7:03:31PM LOTS.
7:03:31PM THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACE CONTAINS 11 LOTS WITH 7 OR 63% OF
7:03:37PM THOSE LOTS DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 TO 54 FEET AND THREE
7:03:42PM OR 27% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 TO 64 FEET.
7:03:46PM AND THIS IS THE ZONING MAP FOR THE PROPERTY.
7:03:53PM SO THIS IS 6th STREET, AND THIS IS WEST WYOMING AVENUE.
7:03:58PM THIS IS THE PROPERTY HERE THAT IS HATCHED IN GREEN.
7:04:01PM SO THIS IS SURROUNDED WITH RS-60 ZONING TO THE NORTH AND THE
7:04:05PM SOUTH.
7:04:06PM THE PD ZONING EXISTS TO THE EAST A LITTLE FARTHER NORTH OF
7:04:09PM THE SITE, AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE IS RS-75 WITH A PD
7:04:15PM ZONING THERE AND THEN SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE IS AN RS-50
7:04:20PM ZONING.
7:04:20PM THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE, SO THIS IS THE SITE THAT'S
7:04:26PM OUTLINED IN RED ON 6th STREET.
7:04:28PM AND I HAVE A COUPLE OF PICTURES OF THE SITE.
7:04:33PM SO THAT IS THE PICTURE OF THE SITE ON 6th STREET.
7:04:40PM THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE.
7:04:49PM HEADING FURTHER NORTH, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
7:04:51PM THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
7:04:53PM THIS IS ACROSS LAILA.
7:04:55PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON 6th STREET.
7:05:01PM THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
7:05:07PM 6th STREET.
7:05:08PM AND THAT'S MOVING FURTHER SOUTH AND FURTHER SOUTH.
7:05:11PM THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE
7:05:17PM APPLICATION CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
7:05:21PM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
7:05:22PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
7:05:23PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
7:05:24PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
7:05:25PM THE, QUOTE, RED-BLUE MAP, I DON'T SEE THAT IN OUR BACKGROUND
7:05:34PM MATERIALS.
7:05:35PM DO WE HAVE COPIES OR DO YOU HAVE EXTRA COPIES?
7:05:38PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: I HAVE EXTRA COPIES I CAN PROVIDE.
7:05:40PM I APOLOGIZE, IT WAS NOT IN THE STAFF REPORT.
7:05:43PM THE ONES WE HAVE TONIGHT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STAFF
7:05:45PM REPORT.
7:05:46PM WE WERE STILL WORKING ON THE MAP, CONFIGURING IT IN A WAY
7:05:50PM THAT WOULD BE EASY TO READ SO I DIDN'T INCLUDE IT IN THE
7:05:55PM REPORT.
7:05:55PM I APOLOGIZE.
7:05:56PM BUT I HAVE COPIES.
7:05:57PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I RECALL THE CODE SPOKE TO THE ISSUE OF
7:06:04PM THE BLOCK FACE AND A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF CONSISTENCY WITH
7:06:09PM THE EXISTING BLOCK FACE AND THAT SORT OF THING.
7:06:13PM DID YOU ALREADY SPEAK TO THAT IN TERMS OF THE CODE --
7:06:21PM DOESN'T THE CODE SPEAK TO IT AS RELATED TO EUCLIDEAN AND A
7:06:25PM CHANGE FROM THE EUCLIDEAN?
7:06:28PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: NO.
7:06:29PM WHAT WE DID IS BASE THE ANALYSIS ON THE BLOCK FACE AND THEN
7:06:33PM GIVE YOU THE ACTUAL WIDTH THAT EXISTS ON THE BLOCK FACE.
7:06:37PM FOR EUCLIDEAN, HAVE TO MEET RS-50 STANDARDS.
7:06:42PM 20-FOOT FRONT SETBACK, 7 ON THE SIDES.
7:06:46PM MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AND DEPTH.
7:06:48PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I UNDERSTAND THAT.
7:06:50PM MY QUESTION IS, AND MAYBE THINGS HAVE CHANGED AND THAT'S
7:06:52PM FINE.
7:06:53PM I THOUGHT I RECALL THAT THERE WAS SOME LANGUAGE IN THE CODE
7:06:56PM THAT SAYS WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE EXISTING PATTERN OF
7:07:01PM DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARE THAT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
7:07:07PM AM I IMAGINING SOMETHING OR IS THAT GONE OR WHAT?
7:07:14PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: WITHIN THE PD CRITERIA.
7:07:15PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OH, THAT WAS WITHIN THE PD CRITERIA IN
7:07:18PM TERMS OF CHANGING.
7:07:21PM ALL RIGHT.
7:07:22PM SO IT WASN'T EUCLIDEAN.
7:07:23PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: NOT FOR THE RS-50.
7:07:26PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GOT IT.
7:07:27PM THANK YOU.
7:07:28PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
7:07:48PM >> GOOD EVENING.
7:07:49PM STEVE MICHELINI.
7:07:50PM I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
7:07:51PM LET ME JUST START BY SAYING THAT, FIRST OF ALL, THIS AREA IS
7:07:56PM UNDERGOING GENTRIFICATION AND NEW DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT
7:08:00PM THIS AREA.
7:08:02PM THERE ARE A NUMBER OF VERY LARGE LOTS THAT, FOR WHATEVER
7:08:07PM REASON, SOME OF THEM WERE NOT PLATTED.
7:08:09PM SOME OF THEM WERE PLATTED.
7:08:11PM BUT THEY ARE EXTREMELY LARGE PARCELS, AND THEY GOT LUMPED
7:08:16PM INTO THE RES-10 CATEGORY, WHICH WAS RESIDENTIAL 10, 10 UNITS
7:08:20PM PER ACRE, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION OF RS-50 OR 60
7:08:27PM OR ABOVE ZONING DESIGNATION.
7:08:32PM IN THIS CASE, IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPERTY, AND
7:08:38PM LaCHONE SPOKE TO THIS, YOU HAVE A LARGE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S
7:08:42PM A PD THAT ESSENTIALLY THESE LOTS ARE 50 FEET IN WIDTH, AND
7:08:48PM THEN YOU HAVE SOME IN HERE THAT ALTHOUGH ZONED RS 60 THEY
7:08:53PM ARE NONCONFORMING.
7:08:55PM THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS GOING IN THE AREA SEEM TO BE RS-50,
7:08:59PM WHICH IS A 5,000-SQUARE-FOOT LOT.
7:09:01PM AND IN THIS CASE, THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE PROPOSING FOR AN
7:09:05PM RS-50 DESIGNATION IS 12,000 SQUARE FEET, WHICH WOULD BE
7:09:09PM 6,000 SQUARE FEET PER LOT.
7:09:11PM AND WE ARE PROPOSING SOMETHING THAT'S TYPICAL FOR THIS AREA.
7:09:19PM AND TO ANSWER ONE OF THE QUESTIONS ONE OF THE COUNCIL
7:09:23PM MEMBERS HAD WAS THAT WE HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT BY
7:09:26PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL AS THE CITY STAFF WHERE THEY
7:09:31PM HAVE TO FIND THAT THE INTENT OF THE CITY FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL
7:09:34PM DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE TO ADJACENT AREAS.
7:09:38PM AND BOTH THE CITY STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
7:09:42PM FOUND THAT THIS PROPOSAL WAS MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE.
7:09:46PM I THINK THAT LaCHONE ALSO POINTED OUT THAT 63.8 OR
7:09:51PM SOMETHING, NEARLY 64% OF THE PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA, THIS
7:09:57PM WOULD BE COMPLIANT AND CONFORMING WITH THOSE, AND 27% ARE
7:10:03PM LARGER THAN THE LOT THAT'S BEING PROPOSED.
7:10:06PM ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPENS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS
7:10:10PM IS THAT THE EVALUATION FOR SUFFICIENT WATER AND SEWER, AS
7:10:14PM WELL AS SIDEWALKS AND STREETS, HAS TO BE MAINTAINED, AND IF
7:10:18PM THERE ARE ANY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS FOR WATER, SEWER,
7:10:21PM STREETS, SIDEWALKS, THEN THIS PROJECT HAS TO MEET THOSE AND
7:10:27PM INSTALL IMPROVEMENTS TO EACH OF THOSE.
7:10:29PM IT'S NOT A MATTER OF OBTAINING A WAIVER.
7:10:32PM THEY HAVE TO MEET THE STORMWATER CODE AS WELL.
7:10:34PM THERE'S NO WAIVER ALLOWED FOR THAT.
7:10:36PM OUR PROPOSAL IS TO MEET THE RS-50 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
7:10:41PM WITHOUT ANY REDUCTION IN SIDE YARDS, FRONT YARDS OR REAR
7:10:45PM YARD SETBACKS OR HEIGHT FOR THAT MATTER.
7:10:47PM I THINK THAT DAVID HEY POINTED OUT, B ZONE IN TERMS OF FLOOD
7:10:54PM ZONE AREA.
7:10:55PM SO WE'LL HAVE TO MEET THE FLOOD ZONE CRITERIA IN TERMS OF
7:10:59PM ELEVATION, AND WE CAN'T IMPACT ANY ADJACENT PROPERTY
7:11:02PM REGARDING STORMWATER RUNOFF.
7:11:04PM WITH THAT BEING SAID, I CERTAINLY WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR
7:11:11PM CONSIDERATION FOR AN APPROVAL.
7:11:12PM WE HAVE MET THE CRITERIA, AND THE CITY STAFF HAS FOUND IT TO
7:11:15PM BE CONSISTENT AND MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE OF ANY OTHER ADJACENT
7:11:19PM PROPERTY AND CONSISTENT WITH THE BLOCK FACE THAT WE'RE
7:11:22PM PROPOSING THIS DEVELOPMENT ON.
7:11:24PM I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
7:11:27PM OUT OF ALL THE NOTICES WE SENT OUT, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY
7:11:30PM CALLS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL, AND THERE WERE NO
7:11:34PM NEGATIVE COMMENTS, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT WERE RECEIVED BY
7:11:36PM THE CITY STAFF.
7:11:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:11:39PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
7:11:41PM FROM CITY COUNCIL.
7:11:43PM OKAY.
7:11:44PM THANK YOU, SIR.
7:11:45PM BEING NONE, WE NEXT MOVE TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
7:11:47PM IF YOU'RE HERE FOR ITEM NUMBER 3 AND WISH TO PUBLICLY
7:11:51PM COMMENT, HERE IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO, SO PLEASE COME
7:11:54PM FORWARD AT THIS TIME.
7:11:55PM OKAY.
7:11:56PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
7:11:57PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN
7:11:58PM MIRANDA.
7:11:59PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
7:12:00PM ALL IN FAVOR?
7:12:01PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:12:01PM COUNCILMAN CITRO, DO YOU MIND TAKING ITEM NUMBER 3, SIR?
7:12:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
7:12:07PM FILE NUMBER REZ 19-41.
7:12:10PM I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
7:12:13PM CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
7:12:15PM VICINITY OF 5818 SOUTH 6th STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
7:12:20PM FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM
7:12:23PM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 (RESIDENTIAL,
7:12:27PM SINGLE-FAMILY) TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY;
7:12:32PM PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7:12:33PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
7:12:35PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:12:37PM ALL IN FAVOR?
7:12:38PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:12:40PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
7:12:41PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH DINGFELDER BEING ABSENT AT
7:12:44PM VOTE.
7:12:44PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
7:12:48PM 9:30 A.M.
7:12:52PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: COUNCIL, LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND
7:12:54PM DEVELOPMENT.
7:12:54PM ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZ 19-42.
7:12:58PM THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6230 INTERBAY BOULEVARD.
7:13:01PM THE REQUEST IS FROM RS-60 TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL
7:13:05PM SINGLE-FAMILY.
7:13:05PM THE APPLICANT FOR THIS REQUEST IS JOHN LUM AND STEVE
7:13:09PM MICHELINI.
7:13:15PM >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING.
7:13:16PM DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
7:13:18PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
7:13:19PM WE REMAIN DOWN IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS
7:13:22PM NEXT CASE.
7:13:23PM ALSO JUST MOVE A LITTLE BIT SOUTH, WE'RE IN THE INTERBAY
7:13:30PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
7:13:31PM THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS AVAILABLE OUT ON SOUTH DALE MABRY
7:13:35PM HIGHWAY.
7:13:35PM IT'S ROUGHLY .6 MILES TO THE WEST.
7:13:38PM THIS ONE IS ALSO WITHIN THE LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE.
7:13:43PM AND, AGAIN, THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS
7:13:46PM SKYVIEW PARK, WHICH IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET TO
7:13:50PM THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
7:13:51PM HERE WE HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE.
7:14:00PM THIS IS INTERBAY.
7:14:02PM THIS IS SHERIDAN ROAD GOING NORTH.
7:14:06PM AND YOU'VE GOT SHELBOURNE AVENUE KIND OF LOOPS TO THE SOUTH
7:14:11PM OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
7:14:12PM THIS IS THE CIRCLE C RANCH RIGHT HERE.
7:14:16PM THIS IS SKYVIEW PARK OVER ON MARTINDALE AVENUE, AND THEN
7:14:24PM THIS LARGE GREEN AREA IS THE E.L.A.P.P., SOUTH TAMPA
7:14:28PM E.L.A.P.P. PROPERTY.
7:14:28PM ALSO, YOU CAN SEE THE PAVILION APARTMENTS OVER ON
7:14:31PM MacDILL.
7:14:32PM YOU CAN SEE THE PREDOMINANT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
7:14:36PM SURROUNDING AREA IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL.
7:14:40PM AGAIN, THERE'S COMMERCIAL FURTHER UP INTERBAY, AND THEN
7:14:47PM THERE'S ALSO COMMERCIAL OUT ON SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
7:14:50PM ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THIS TAN COLOR AND ALL THE
7:14:58PM PROPERTIES SURROUNDING IT, INCLUDING THE CIRCLE C RANCH NEXT
7:15:01PM DOOR, IS ALL RESIDENTIAL 10.
7:15:03PM AGAIN, THIS IS INTERBAY MOVING EAST ON INTERBAY, IT STARTS
7:15:08PM BECOMING A LITTLE MORE DENSE.
7:15:09PM THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20 IN THE BROWN, AND THEN YOU'VE GOT
7:15:13PM THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
7:15:15PM THERE'S SOME RETAIL SHOPPING THERE.
7:15:19PM BUT YOU CAN SEE THE PREDOMINANT AREA IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 10
7:15:24PM AND THEN YOU'VE GOT THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE REPRESENTED BY
7:15:28PM THE GREEN REPRESENTING SKYVIEW PARK AND THE E.L.A.P.P.
7:15:31PM PROPERTIES.
7:15:32PM THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM THAT RESIDENTIAL
7:15:37PM SINGLE-FAMILY 60 TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO
7:15:40PM ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO A MAXIMUM OF SEVEN
7:15:44PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
7:15:47PM THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITH AN
7:15:50PM AREA THAT IS PLANNED FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF UP TO
7:15:53PM 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE BASED ON THAT UNDERLYING
7:15:57PM RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
7:15:58PM RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PARCELS ADJACENT TO INTERBAY
7:16:02PM BOULEVARD BETWEEN SOUTH MAINE AVENUE, WHICH IS OVER HERE,
7:16:11PM AND THEN TO WEST BAY AVENUE HERE, WE ANALYZED THAT AREA AND
7:16:17PM THE PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THAT SUBJECT SITE ALSO ALONG
7:16:21PM SOUTH SHELBOURNE AVENUE.
7:16:24PM ALL THOSE SURROUNDING PARCELS ARE DEVELOPED AT AN AVERAGE
7:16:28PM DENSITY OF 6.2 UNITS PER ACRE.
7:16:31PM OVERALL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE PROPOSED
7:16:36PM RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT WILL BE OF A SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT, AND
7:16:39PM SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES, AND IT SHOULD NOT
7:16:48PM ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE INTERBAY NEIGHBORHOOD.
7:16:50PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
7:16:52PM FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS
7:16:55PM OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
7:16:57PM THANK YOU.
7:17:06PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
7:17:08PM COUNCIL, AGAIN, THIS IS REZ 19-42.
7:17:11PM SO THE REQUEST IS FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
7:17:15PM IT IS A EUCLIDEAN REQUEST, SO THEREFORE NO WAIVERS ARE
7:17:19PM PERMITTED WITH THIS REQUEST.
7:17:22PM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 200 BY 155 AT THE
7:17:29PM SHORTEST DEPTH.
7:17:32PM IT'S AN ODD SHAPE SO I WANTED TO SHOW YOU ON THE MAP.
7:17:35PM THIS IS INTERBAY BOULEVARD.
7:17:37PM THIS IS SHELBOURNE, AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPERTY IN
7:17:42PM QUESTION, WHICH IS THE GREEN STRIPED AREA.
7:17:43PM THIS IS THE SHORTEST DISTANCE, WHICH IS 155 FEET.
7:17:47PM THE LONGEST DEPTH IS 378 FEET AT THIS DISTANCE.
7:17:50PM SO THIS ACTUALLY CONSISTS OF TWO PARCELS WHICH WOULD BE
7:17:56PM COMBINED INTO ONE.
7:17:57PM THE TOTAL LOT AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 56,126 SQUARE FEET,
7:18:03PM 1.29 ACRES.
7:18:06PM THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR FOUR LOTS, WHICH MUST ADHERE TO
7:18:10PM THE RS-50 CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT THE
7:18:13PM TIME OF PERMITTING.
7:18:13PM THE REQUEST PROPOSES TO COMBINE TWO UNPLATTED LOTS.
7:18:17PM AND THESE LOTS ARE LOCATED ON INTERBAY.
7:18:20PM IT'S LOCATED JUST EAST OF ALLERTON PARK SUBDIVISION AND
7:18:24PM SOUTH OF SPEEDWAY PLACE SUBDIVISION.
7:18:26PM ALTHOUGH THE AREA IS WEST AND NORTH OF THE SITE PLATTED,
7:18:30PM THESE TWO PARCELS THAT ARE UNDER THIS REQUEST HAVE NOT BEEN
7:18:33PM PLATTED.
7:18:34PM ON THIS BLOCK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF INTERBAY IS THE CLOSEST
7:18:38PM ANALYSIS THAT WAS CONDUCTED.
7:18:40PM THE PARCELS TO THE NORTH ARE A PART OF THE SPEEDWAY PLACE
7:18:45PM SUBDIVISION.
7:18:46PM THEY ARE PLATTED IN 1916.
7:18:48PM IT CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 14 LOTS WITH CORNER LOTS PLATTED,
7:18:52PM RANGING FROM 137 FEET TO 170 FEET.
7:18:55PM THE INTERNAL LOTS ARE PLATTED AT A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 50 FEET
7:18:59PM AND A MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 55 FEET.
7:19:02PM THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 8 LOTS WHICH FRONT INTERBAY AND ALL 8
7:19:07PM LOTS, 100% ARE PLATTED AT 50 FEET.
7:19:12PM DEPTHS RANGING FROM 114 FEET TO 118 FEET.
7:19:15PM AND THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
7:19:20PM SO THIS IS INTERBAY.
7:19:23PM THIS IS SHERIDAN, AND THEN THIS IS THE SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
7:19:27PM ACTUALLY THIS OUTLINE SHOULD GO HERE ALSO.
7:19:29PM TO INCLUDE THAT OTHER PARCEL.
7:19:33PM THIS IS THE SITE ON INTERBAY.
7:19:39PM THIS IS ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE SITE.
7:19:44PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM SHERIDAN.
7:19:51PM EAST OF THE SITE.
7:19:54PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST ON INTERBAY.
7:19:59PM AND THIS IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHICH IS
7:20:01PM SURROUNDING, AND THAT'S TO THE NORTH.
7:20:03PM ANOTHER VIEW NORTH, ALSO TO THE NORTH.
7:20:09PM AND THAT'S THE VIEW LOOKING ON SHERIDAN, NORTH OF THE SITE.
7:20:16PM THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
7:20:19PM AND THEN HEADING FURTHER WEST THIS TAKES YOU AROUND THE
7:20:22PM CORNER TO THE OPPOSITE SITE ALONG THE WEST ON SHERIDAN.
7:20:29PM THAT'S SOUTH OF THE SITE, AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
7:20:34PM LOCATED SOUTH.
7:20:36PM SO THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS IT
7:20:42PM CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT
7:20:44PM REGULATIONS.
7:20:44PM AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
7:20:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
7:20:48PM ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
7:20:50PM OKAY.
7:20:50PM BEING NONE, APPLICANT?
7:20:59PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
7:21:00PM STEVE MICHELINI, REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
7:21:02PM AGAIN, AS I MENTIONED TO YOU EARLIER, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE
7:21:06PM AREAS THAT HAS VERY LARGE UNPLATTED PROPERTY THAT, FOR
7:21:11PM WHATEVER REASON, HAS REMAINED IN THIS CONDITION FOR A VERY
7:21:15PM LONG TIME.
7:21:15PM WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO IS COME IN AND WE'LL HAVE TO
7:21:21PM SUBDIVIDE THIS, SO WE'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH ALL THE CITY
7:21:24PM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS IN ORDER TO CREATE THE LOTS THAT ARE
7:21:27PM THERE.
7:21:28PM WE'LL HAVE TO PROPOSE THE EXTENSION OF THE WATER LINES, THE
7:21:31PM SEWER LINES, THE FIRE LINES, AND CREATE ALL OF THE EASEMENTS
7:21:36PM FOR ALL THE UTILITIES.
7:21:37PM THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A STRONGER THRESHOLD TO MEET THAN A
7:21:43PM TRADITIONAL LOT SPLIT.
7:21:45PM IT'S A UNIQUE PIECE OF PROPERTY, AND AS LaCHONE HAS
7:21:49PM POINTED OUT, IT'S 1.29 ACRES.
7:21:54PM AGAIN, WE HAVE TO MEET THOSE SAME THRESHOLDS.
7:21:56PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF HAS FOUND IT TO
7:21:58PM BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FACT THAT IT'S MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE
7:22:02PM OF ANY OTHER ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
7:22:04PM SO YOU HAVE OTHER INFILL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA.
7:22:09PM MOST OF THESE SEEM TO BE BEING DEVELOPED ALONG 50-FOOT WIDE
7:22:13PM LOTS.
7:22:14PM AND YOU'LL ALSO SEE NOT ONLY AN ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT OF
7:22:18PM UTILITIES FOR WATER AND SEWER AND THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT
7:22:21PM YOU'LL SEE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS COMING OFF OF INTERBAY.
7:22:24PM SO IF THERE'S A MAIN EXTENSION THAT HAS TO OCCUR THIS
7:22:29PM PROJECT HAS TO PAY FOR THAT.
7:22:30PM AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW,
7:22:33PM AS I INDICATED.
7:22:35PM AND THAT SUBDIVISION PLAT WILL COME BACK TO YOU FOR YOU
7:22:39PM APPROVAL AFTER THE CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED IT.
7:22:42PM WE HAVE BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT, BOTH THE CITY STAFF AND THE
7:22:46PM PLANNING COMMISSION, AND IN THEIR REVIEWS, IN TERMS OF THE
7:22:49PM LAND USE CLASSIFICATION AS WELL AS MEETING ALL OF THE
7:22:53PM TECHNICAL STANDARDS, WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR
7:22:56PM APPROVAL.
7:22:57PM I BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE MET THE THRESHOLDS THAT ARE
7:22:59PM ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NOT ONLY THE
7:23:02PM CITY AND THEIR REQUIREMENTS BUT ALSO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
7:23:06PM OWNERS.
7:23:06PM WITH A PROPERTY THIS SIZE OF 200 FEET BY 155 FEET, WE
7:23:12PM HAVE -- AND 1.29 ACRES, IT IS A VERY LARGE PARCEL.
7:23:17PM WE'LL HAVE TO DEVELOP A ROADWAY IN THERE AS WELL FOR ACCESS
7:23:21PM FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AS WELL AS ACCESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
7:23:25PM ITSELF.
7:23:26PM ALL OF THAT PROPERTY WON'T BE UTILIZED FOR HOMES.
7:23:30PM WE'LL HAVE TO PROVIDE THE ACCESS OFF INTERBAY THAT WILL MEET
7:23:34PM ALL OF THE STANDARDS, INCLUDING THOSE FOR THE FIRE TRUCKS
7:23:37PM AND THE EMERGENCY ACCESS.
7:23:38PM ANYWAY, I BELIEVE IT IS CONSISTENT.
7:23:41PM THE STAFF HAS FOUND IT CONSISTENT AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY
7:23:46PM APPRECIATE YOUR APPROVAL.
7:23:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:23:48PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
7:23:50PM OKAY, BEING NONE, PUBLIC COMMENT, ANYBODY HERE TO COMMENT ON
7:23:56PM ITEM NUMBER 4, IF SO, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
7:23:58PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
7:23:59PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:24:01PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
7:24:04PM ANY IN FAVOR?
7:24:06PM ANY OPPOSED.
7:24:09PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
7:24:10PM FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
7:24:12PM AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
7:24:14PM 6230 INTERBAY BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND
7:24:17PM MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
7:24:20PM DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY)
7:24:23PM TO RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY); PROVIDING AN
7:24:28PM EFFECTIVE DATE SECOND.
7:24:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:24:32PM A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
7:24:34PM ANY IN FAVOR?
7:24:36PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:24:37PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH DINGFELDER ABSENT AT VOTE.
7:24:40PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION TO BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
7:24:43PM 9:30 A.M.
7:24:44PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:24:45PM WE MOVE NEXT TO ITEM NUMBER 6.
7:24:49PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: ITEM NUMBER 6 IS REZ 19-27.
7:24:54PM REZONING REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY AT 4515 AND 4519 WEST
7:24:58PM NORTH A STREET FROM RM-18 AND RS-50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
7:25:03PM FOR ATTACHED AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
7:25:07PM >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
7:25:08PM DAVID HEY AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
7:25:11PM WE MOVE OVER TO THE WESTSHORE PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS
7:25:14PM NEXT CASE.
7:25:16PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WESTSHORE PALMS
7:25:21PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
7:25:22PM THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS THE CHARLES B.
7:25:27PM WILLIAMS PARK.
7:25:29PM THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AREA WITH TRANSIT SERVICE.
7:25:38PM HART'S BUS ROUTE 30 CURRENTLY SERVES THE SITE AT THE
7:25:41PM INTERSECTION OF WEST TRASK AND WEST KENNEDY.
7:25:45PM AND THE SUBJECT SITE FALLS WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
7:25:49PM ON TO THE AERIAL, HERE'S THE SUBJECT SITE.
7:25:58PM THIS IS NORTH A.
7:26:00PM THIS IS TRASK.
7:26:03PM TO THE SOUTH IS A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY.
7:26:08PM I THINK WITH FRONTIER.
7:26:12PM THEN THERE'S ALSO THE COMMERCIAL ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
7:26:17PM I BELIEVE ONE OF THESE ARE DAVID'S BRIDAL.
7:26:22PM AS YOU GO DOWN, THIS IS THE WALGREENS AND THIS IS THE
7:26:25PM WESTSHORE PLAZA OVER HERE.
7:26:27PM YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS PORTION OF THE WESTSHORE PALMS
7:26:31PM NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BEEN TRANSITIONING INTO MORE OF A
7:26:34PM TOWNHOME-STYLE DEVELOPMENT.
7:26:35PM THERE IS SOME MULTIFAMILY CLOSER TO WESTSHORE AND THEN, OF
7:26:40PM COURSE, YOU SEE THE INTERSTATE FURTHER TO THE NORTH THERE.
7:26:43PM ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL OF
7:26:49PM THIS BROWN COLOR IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
7:26:54PM AS WE MOVE WEST PAST TRASK STREET, THE COLOR OF BROWN
7:26:59PM CHANGES.
7:26:59PM THAT BECOMES RESIDENTIAL 35.
7:27:01PM THEN WE MOVE INTO THE REGIONAL MIXED USE 100 REPRESENTED BY
7:27:06PM THIS PINKISH RED COLOR.
7:27:10PM THEN DOWN ON KENNEDY, THIS IS THE URBAN MIXED USE 60 FUTURE
7:27:16PM LAND USE CATEGORY.
7:27:17PM AND THEN IT DROPS OFF FOR DENSITY-WISE INTO THAT RESIDENTIAL
7:27:21PM 6 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PATTERN REPRESENTED BY THE YELLOW.
7:27:25PM THE REQUEST IS TO SEEK APPROVAL TO CHANGE THE ZONING
7:27:31PM DISTRICT ON AN APPROXIMATELY .76-ACRE SUBJECT SITE FROM THAT
7:27:35PM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 AND RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18
7:27:39PM TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
7:27:41PM THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP 12 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
7:27:45PM RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES AND ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNIT ON
7:27:50PM THE SITE.
7:27:51PM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROVIDES FOR AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 17.1
7:27:55PM UNITS PER ACRE.
7:27:57PM THAT'S BELOW THE 20 UNITS THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THAT
7:28:01PM RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
7:28:03PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PETITIONER'S
7:28:06PM REQUEST AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS FROM THE PROPOSED
7:28:09PM PROJECT TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
7:28:11PM THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES OF THE
7:28:13PM CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO HOUSING, THE
7:28:17PM NEEDS OF THE CITY'S POPULATION.
7:28:19PM ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES
7:28:22PM INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND NEW HOUSING ON UNDERUTILIZED SITES.
7:28:27PM PROPOSED REZONING WOULD FURTHER THIS POLICY DIRECTION OF THE
7:28:30PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT
7:28:36PM WITHIN THIS PORTION OF THE WESTSHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD.
7:28:40PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT TO
7:28:42PM CONTINUE TO WORK WITH NATURAL RESOURCES TO ENSURE THAT THE
7:28:46PM PROTECTION OF TREES ON-SITE IS ENSURED THROUGH AS THE SITE
7:28:50PM IS PROCESSED THROUGH SITE DEVELOPMENT.
7:28:53PM AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
7:28:56PM STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH
7:28:58PM THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
7:29:01PM THANK YOU.
7:29:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:29:07PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO, FOR THE RECORD.
7:29:10PM AGAIN, AS DAVID STATED, THIS IS FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
7:29:17PM HERE'S THE ZONING MAP OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
7:29:21PM AS I STATED, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN GREEN.
7:29:24PM THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS ZONED RM-18.
7:29:29PM AND THEN THIS SECTION AND SWATH AND THEN THE INFILL IS THE
7:29:32PM RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT.
7:29:35PM DOWN TO THE SOUTH ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD IT IS ZONED
7:29:39PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND THEN A MIX OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
7:29:43PM FOR MULTIFAMILY AND APARTMENTS OVER ON THE WEST SIDE OF
7:29:46PM NORTH TRASK STREET.
7:29:47PM PHOTOGRAPHIC TOUR OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
7:29:55PM HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
7:29:56PM IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT.
7:29:57PM ACROSS THE STREET IS THE BACK OF THE SHOPPING CENTER ALONG
7:30:02PM KENNEDY.
7:30:02PM THAT IS DAVID'S BRIDAL AS WELL AS A FRONTIER, BACK OF A
7:30:07PM FRONTIER BUILDING.
7:30:08PM ON THE CORNER OF TRASK AND NORTH A STREET THERE ALREADY IS A
7:30:15PM TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT THAT COVERS THAT WHOLE SHORT END OF THE
7:30:20PM BLOCK.
7:30:21PM AND THEN THE REMAINING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUBJECT
7:30:24PM PROPERTY, NORTH B STREET AND THEN ON THE REMAINING PORTIONS
7:30:28PM OF NORTH A STREET, IT'S CURRENTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
7:30:32PM AS YOU CAN SEE, TYPICALLY ONE-STORY HOUSES.
7:30:44PM HERE IS THE SITE PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING.
7:30:49PM THE ENTIRE SITE IS .76 ACRES.
7:30:52PM TWO LOTS OFF OF THE INTERSECTION OF TRASK AND NORTH A
7:30:57PM STREET.
7:30:57PM THEY ARE PROPOSING SETBACKS, FRONT THREE FEET, AGAIN, PART
7:31:05PM OF THE THREE-FOOT SETBACK IS BECAUSE THEY ARE HAVING A FRONT
7:31:09PM YARD COURTYARD ELEMENT THAT THE APPLICANT CAN SPEAK TO IN
7:31:14PM MORE DETAIL.
7:31:16PM BUT THEY ARE HAVING KIND OF A WALLED-IN FRONT COURTYARD
7:31:18PM ELEMENT.
7:31:19PM THERE ARE THREE SEPARATE BUILDINGS.
7:31:21PM THIS ONE WILL BE TOWNHOMES WITH EIGHT UNITS.
7:31:23PM THERE WILL BE FOUR UNITS TO THE NORTH, AND THEN A SINGLE
7:31:27PM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT, STAND-ALONE UP IN THE CORNER.
7:31:31PM BASED ON THE REQUIRED PARKING, 29 PARKING SPACES ARE
7:31:39PM REQUIRED.
7:31:39PM 30 ARE BEING PROVIDED.
7:31:41PM SO THEY MEET PARKING.
7:31:42PM THERE ARE FIVE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
7:31:44PM TO REDUCE, AND THEY ARE MAJORITY FROM THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY.
7:31:50PM THE FIRST ONE, THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY STANDARDS STATE THAT
7:31:53PM THE FRONT YARD SETBACK SHOULD MATCH WHAT THE UNDERLYING
7:31:57PM ZONING IS.
7:31:57PM THE UNDERLYING ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY IS, AS I SAID, R
7:32:02PM M-18.
7:32:04PM THAT HAS A 25-FOOT SETBACK.
7:32:07PM ASKING FOR A WAIVER TO GO DOWN TO THREE FEET.
7:32:09PM ANOTHER WESTSHORE OVERLAY STANDARD IS TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM
7:32:13PM SIDEWALK WIDTH INTERNALLY FROM FIVE FEET DOWN TO FOUR FEET.
7:32:17PM PART OF THIS IS A RESULT OF REQUIRED DRIVEWAY WIDTHS.
7:32:25PM INSTEAD OF A FIVE-FOOT INTERNAL SIDEWALK, IN SOME AREAS THEY
7:32:25PM ARE REQUESTING TO GO DOWN TO FOUR FOOT IN WIDTH.
7:32:28PM THE NEXT WAIVER 27-238, IT WAS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
7:32:33PM VEHICLE USE AREA BUFFER ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIALLY ZONED
7:32:40PM PROPERTY FROM 25 FEET WITH A 15-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND A
7:32:42PM SIX-FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL TO THREE FEET WITH A PVC FENCE
7:32:48PM ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES.
7:32:51PM SIMILARLY, ANOTHER WAIVER TO 27-238 IS TO REDUCE THE
7:32:54PM REQUIRED BUFFER ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES FROM A
7:32:59PM 15-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND -- A SIX-FOOT MASONRY WALL TO
7:33:05PM THREE FOOT AND PVC FENCE TO THE EAST AND WEST OF THE
7:33:08PM PROPERTY LINE, EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINE AND EIGHT FEET
7:33:12PM FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
7:33:14PM AGAIN, THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY HAS CERTAIN BUFFER STANDARDS
7:33:19PM FOR PARKING ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AND THEN JUST A TOWNHOME
7:33:24PM DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL.
7:33:26PM AND THEN THE LAST WAIVER THAT'S BEING REQUIRED AND REQUESTED
7:33:28PM IS TO 27-282, THE CODE SAYS THAT FOR ALL TOWNHOME
7:33:35PM DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS WHAT WE CALL ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
7:33:37PM RESIDENTIAL OR MULTIFAMILY, ALL FRONT DOORS IN THE SPACE OF
7:33:42PM PUBLIC -- MUST FACE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
7:33:44PM ALL THESE FRONT DOORS FACE NORTH A AS WELL AS THIS ONE AND
7:33:47PM THE BACK FACES NORTH A.
7:33:49PM HOWEVER, THESE FOUR UNITS, THE FRONT DOORS FACE THE INTERNAL
7:33:54PM DRIVE AISLE.
7:33:55PM SO A WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR THOSE FRONT DOORS.
7:33:58PM IF THIS WERE TO BE APPROVED WITH THE WAIVERS, PLANNING
7:34:02PM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAS SOME CHANGES BETWEEN
7:34:05PM FIRST AND SECOND READING.
7:34:07PM BASICALLY JUST SOME CLERICAL CORRECTIONS.
7:34:11PM URBAN DESIGN DID FIND THIS INCONSISTENT BASED ON THE WAIVERS
7:34:14PM REQUESTED TO THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE
7:34:21PM BUFFER WAIVERS AND SETBACK.
7:34:22PM NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
7:34:24PM THEY HAVE SOME CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS
7:34:27PM WELL AS STORMWATER HAS SOME MODIFICATIONS BUT THEY DID FIND
7:34:31PM IT CONSISTENT.
7:34:33PM OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF DID FIND
7:34:36PM IT INCONSISTENT AGAIN THROUGH URBAN DESIGN, DUE TO THE
7:34:38PM WAIVERS TO THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY.
7:34:42PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY QUESTIONS?
7:34:43PM THANK YOU, MA'AM.
7:34:46PM >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
7:34:49PM >>LUIS VIERA: APPLICANT?
7:35:03PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
7:35:04PM MY NAME IS JOE TOTH.
7:35:04PM I'M THE ARCHITECT REPRESENTING THE OWNER.
7:35:09PM THIS IS A REALLY FANTASTIC LOCATION THAT IS BECOMING BETTER
7:35:14PM AND BETTER EVERY DAY AS THE WESTSHORE DISTRICT STARTS TO
7:35:18PM MATURE AND BECOME A LITTLE MORE SOPHISTICATED, MORE URBAN
7:35:21PM AND MORE PEDESTRIAN.
7:35:22PM I'M SURE YOU PROBABLY ARE ALL AWARE OF WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED
7:35:27PM FOR THE BIG PARKING LOT OUT IN FRONT OF THE OLD SEARS STORE
7:35:30PM THERE.
7:35:30PM THE MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, HOTEL, MEDICAL OFFICE,
7:35:36PM RETAIL, RESTAURANT LOCATION THERE, WHICH IS ONLY A BLOCK
7:35:39PM FROM THIS LOCATION.
7:35:40PM AND THIS AREA OF WESTSHORE, WHICH THIS IS OUR SITE, OF
7:35:47PM COURSE.
7:35:48PM KENNEDY BOULEVARD IS HERE.
7:35:50PM THIS IS THAT LARGE WAREHOUSE BUILDING FOR SWITCHES, VERIZON
7:35:56PM AND SUCH.
7:35:57PM THIS AREA IS REALLY IN THE TRANSITION PHASE FROM
7:36:01PM SINGLE-FAMILY TO MULTIFAMILY.
7:36:04PM THIS ENTIRE AREA TO THE WEST OF US IS PRETTY MUCH ALL
7:36:07PM MULTIFAMILY NOW, AND THEN AS YOU HEAD DOWN NORTH A IN
7:36:11PM PARTICULAR, THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY AND
7:36:14PM PD ZONING ALONG NORTH A AS YOU GET DOWN TO -- THERE'S QUITE
7:36:19PM A BIT OF MULTIFAMILY.
7:36:20PM YOU CAN SEE RIGHT HERE IN THIS UPPER CORNER, THERE'S ANOTHER
7:36:23PM MULTIFAMILY TOWN HOUSE PROJECT THERE AND MORE COMING.
7:36:26PM SO THIS IS QUITE A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
7:36:30PM THIS AREA IS TRANSITIONING INTO A REALLY NICE MULTIFAMILY
7:36:34PM AREA.
7:36:35PM AND, FRANKLY, IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE A FEW YEARS AGO WE WOULD
7:36:39PM EVEN TALK ABOUT WESTSHORE BEING PEDESTRIAN BUT THIS AREA IS
7:36:44PM ALMOST BECOMING PEDESTRIAN.
7:36:45PM WE'RE A BLOCK FROM WESTSHORE MALL AND ALL THE DEVELOPMENT
7:36:48PM GOING ON THERE.
7:36:50PM DARE I SAY I THINK WE MAY SOMEDAY HAVE A PEDESTRIAN PLACE
7:36:53PM HERE, WHICH IS PART OF THE FOCUS AND ATTENTION AND THE
7:36:55PM APPROACH THAT WE'VE TAKEN TO THIS PROJECT.
7:36:57PM AGAIN, YOU'LL SEE RIGHT TO OUR WEST, RIGHT HERE, THERE'S A
7:37:03PM REALLY ATTRACTIVE, NICE APARTMENT COMPLEX HERE, WHICH GOT
7:37:11PM SOME SIGNIFICANT WAIVERS AS WELL AS IN TERMS OF SETBACKS
7:37:14PM SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING.
7:37:15PM HERE IT IS AGAIN.
7:37:19PM HERE'S KENNEDY.
7:37:20PM HERE IS THAT ADJACENT, NICE MODERN TOWN HOUSE PROJECT.
7:37:25PM OUR PROJECT HERE.
7:37:26PM THIS IS THAT TOWN HOUSE PROJECT JUST TO OUR WEST WHICH IS
7:37:34PM REALLY VERY NICE.
7:37:35PM THIS WAS A PD ZONING.
7:37:37PM THEY HAD GOTTEN SOME OF THESE -- SOME RELIEF FROM THE
7:37:40PM WESTSHORE OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REALLY CAUSING THE
7:37:44PM TROUBLE FOR US.
7:37:45PM BACK IN THE 2000s, I WAS THE ONE WHO KIND OF INITIATED THE
7:37:50PM WHOLE WESTSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITH RON ROTELLO BACK IN
7:37:55PM THE OLD WESTSHORE ALLIANCE DAYS.
7:37:57PM I HAD DONE A PROJECT FOR A DEVELOPER ON WESTSHORE, AND THEY
7:38:01PM WANTED A STRIP CENTER WITH PARKING IN THE FRONT AND THE
7:38:03PM BUILDING IN THE BACK.
7:38:04PM I FOUGHT THEM AND JUST WOULDN'T DO IT.
7:38:07PM WE HAD TO DO A STRIP CENTER.
7:38:09PM I REALLY GOT UPSET ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT WHAT WE SHOULD
7:38:12PM DO.
7:38:13PM WE INITIATED THE OVERLAY DISTRICT TO TRY TO MOVE BUILDINGS
7:38:15PM TO THE FRONT, PARKING TO THE BACK SO WE COULD START
7:38:18PM TRANSITIONING THIS WHOLE AREA INTO A MORE URBAN PEDESTRIAN
7:38:21PM KIND OF DISTRICT.
7:38:22PM THIS IS -- I THINK THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO BE PART OF THAT
7:38:27PM TRANSITION, TRY TO MOVE US TOWARD THAT URBAN PEDESTRIAN
7:38:31PM PLACE.
7:38:32PM THIS IS THE BACK OF THAT SAME TOWN HOUSE PROJECT THAT IS
7:38:36PM ADJACENT TO OUR PROJECT RIGHT HERE.
7:38:38PM WHEN THIS WAS BUILT, THIS WAS SINGLE-FAMILY, AND THIS WOULD
7:38:43PM HAVE REQUIRED THE 25-FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT AS WELL, WHICH
7:38:46PM WE'RE ASKING FOR RELIEF ON.
7:38:48PM THIS IS WHERE OUR DRIVEWAY AND VEHICLE ACCESS IS GOING TO BE
7:38:53PM TO THE SITE.
7:38:54PM SO THERE WILL BE SOME RELIEF.
7:38:56PM OUR BUILDING WILL BE ABOUT 30 FEET FROM THIS LOCATION.
7:38:59PM SO THERE WON'T BE ANY BIG SQUEEZE ON THIS GUY'S PRIVATE AREA
7:39:03PM TO THE BACK THERE.
7:39:04PM HERE IS OUR SITE.
7:39:08PM QUICKLY, THEY WALKED YOU THROUGH IT.
7:39:11PM AGAIN, THREE BUILDINGS.
7:39:12PM THE EIGHT-UNIT BUILDING IN THE FRONT FACING NORTH A STREET.
7:39:16PM THE BUILDING IS ACTUALLY PROPOSED FOR 15-FOOT FRONT SETBACK.
7:39:21PM THE THREE FEET IS -- THERE'S A LOW WALL THAT KIND OF HELPS
7:39:26PM DEFINE A LITTLE OUTDOOR SPACE.
7:39:28PM WE'RE TRYING TO CREATE THAT URBAN PEDESTRIAN KIND OF, LIKE A
7:39:33PM LITTLE PORCH ALMOST, SO THERE'S SOME KIND OF A LITTLE SOCIAL
7:39:37PM SPACE IN FRONT OF THE UNITS.
7:39:39PM YOU HAVE THE FRONT DOOR AND THEN A LITTLE PORCH AREA IN THE
7:39:41PM FRONT.
7:39:42PM WE'RE TRYING TO DEFINE THAT BY LITTLE THREE-FOOT WALL THAT
7:39:44PM CAN ACT AS A SEAT FOR THE PORCH SIDE AND THEN A LITTLE
7:39:48PM SEPARATION FROM THE SIDEWALK, WHICH IS RIGHT OUT OF THE
7:39:50PM URBAN LAND INSTITUTE PROFILE ON HOW TO DO URBAN PEDESTRIAN
7:39:55PM DEVELOPMENT, HOW YOU BRING THE BUILDING A LITTLE CLOSER.
7:39:57PM BECAUSE 25 FEET, THE UNDERLYING ZONING HERE WOULD BE EITHER
7:40:00PM 20 OR 25, WHICH PUSHES THE BUILDING SO FAR BACK THAT YOU
7:40:03PM LOSE THAT WHOLE URBAN PEDESTRIAN KIND OF SENSE OF SCALE AND
7:40:08PM RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIDEWALK, PEDESTRIAN, AND BUILDING.
7:40:11PM SO URBAN LAND INSTITUTE IS VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THIS KIND
7:40:15PM OF, THAT 10 TO 15-FOOT IS KIND OF THERE.
7:40:18PM THEIR TARGET NUMBER FOR HOW TO DO THE TOWN HOUSES AND ROW
7:40:22PM HOUSES ON URBAN PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK.
7:40:24PM SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE HERE.
7:40:25PM THE 15 FEET HERE.
7:40:27PM AND THEN THIS IS THAT LITTLE WALL THAT'S JUST THREE FEET.
7:40:29PM WE MOVED IT BACK TO THREE FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE SO WE
7:40:32PM COULD DO A LITTLE HEDGE OR SOMETHING IN FRONT OF THAT LOW
7:40:35PM WALL.
7:40:35PM IT WOULD STEP UP.
7:40:36PM THESE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE ELEVATED A COUPLE OF FEET ABOVE
7:40:39PM THE SIDEWALK, TOO, WHICH IS ALSO OUT OF THE URBAN LAND
7:40:43PM INSTITUTE THAT YOU WANT THAT LITTLE BIT OF A SEPARATION FROM
7:40:45PM THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS DOWN TO THE PUBLIC REALM IN THE
7:40:48PM STREET.
7:40:49PM SO WITH THAT BEING A LITTLE HIGHER THAT LITTLE LOW WALL ALSO
7:40:52PM HELPS MITIGATE THAT TRANSITION BETWEEN ONE AND THE OTHER.
7:40:55PM SO THE ENTRANCE TO THE PROPERTY IS A TWO-WAY ENTRANCE RIGHT
7:40:58PM HERE.
7:41:03PM THIS IS WHERE THE NICE TOWN HOUSE PROJECT IS RIGHT HERE.
7:41:05PM THERE IS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC IN THE AREA BACK HERE WHICH
7:41:08PM PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE GARAGES.
7:41:09PM SO WE HAVE GARAGES IN THE REAR, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ON THE
7:41:13PM PUBLIC SIDE ON THE FRONT.
7:41:15PM THERE IS FOUR UNITS IN THE BACK HERE THAT ALSO HAVE TWO-CAR
7:41:20PM GARAGES AND THEN ALSO AN ENTRANCE, ENTRANCE, TWO-CAR GARAGE,
7:41:25PM ENTRANCE.
7:41:25PM AND THEN THERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNIT BACK HERE.
7:41:31PM THE SETBACKS ARE, LIKE I SAID, 15 ON THE FRONT ALONG NORTH A
7:41:37PM STREET, AND THEN WE'RE ALSO 15 ON THE REAR.
7:41:42PM THERE IS AN ALLEY, A VACATED ALLEY BACK HERE.
7:41:45PM WE'RE 15 HERE AND THEN 15 ALSO OFF THIS.
7:41:48PM WE WENT WITH SEVEN FOOT SETBACKS ON THESE SIDES.
7:41:52PM THAT BEING THE SETBACK OF VIRTUALLY EVERY ZONING DISTRICT IN
7:41:57PM THE CITY OF TAMPA.
7:41:58PM REALIZING THAT THE OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIRES 15-FOOT
7:42:03PM SETBACK, WHEN YOU'RE ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY, THAT
7:42:07PM REQUIREMENT IS NOT -- THE 15-FOOT SETBACK IS NOT REQUIRED ON
7:42:09PM THIS SIDE BECAUSE WE'RE ADJACENT TO PD AND MULTIFAMILY ON
7:42:12PM THIS SIDE.
7:42:13PM OUR POSITION BEING THAT AS THIS AREA IS TRANSITIONING, NORTH
7:42:17PM A STREET, THE WAY IT'S ALL TRANSITIONING INTO MULTIFAMILY,
7:42:20PM WE'RE THINKING THAT THAT'S GOING TO BECOME MULTIFAMILY AS IT
7:42:23PM MOVES FORWARD IN THE FUTURE, ALTHOUGH WE DON'T THINK A SEVEN
7:42:27PM FOOT SETBACK BACK THERE IN THAT REMOTE BACKYARD OF THE
7:42:29PM ADJACENT PROPERTY IS GOING TO HAVE ANY NEGATIVE OR ADVERSE
7:42:32PM IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBOR.
7:42:34PM RIGHT HERE, WHERE WE HAVE A ONE-LANE EXIT DRIVE, THAT IS A
7:42:39PM 19-FOOT SETBACK ON THAT SIDE THERE.
7:42:43PM THIS DRIVEWAY RIGHT NOW IS REALLY A FUNCTION OF WE'RE
7:42:47PM ALLOWING ROOM FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO GET THEIR TRUCK UP
7:42:51PM HERE SO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO THIS REAR BUILDING.
7:42:55PM THIS VEHICLE USE AREA, AND I'LL GET INTO THAT A LITTLE MORE
7:42:58PM WHEN WE GO TO THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
7:43:00PM BUT THAT'S WHAT THAT DRIVE LANE IS FOR.
7:43:03PM IT'S NOT REALLY ESSENTIAL FOR THE TRAFFIC MOVEMENT FOR OUR
7:43:06PM PROJECT.
7:43:07PM WE HAVE IN AND OUT TRAFFIC HERE, WHICH IS SUFFICIENT TO
7:43:09PM HANDLE THAT.
7:43:12PM IT'S AN EXIT-ONLY CURRENTLY.
7:43:15PM BUT IT WAS PRIMARILY FOR FIRE CONTROL ACCESS.
7:43:18PM AND THEN THERE ARE, LIKE I SAID, FOUR GUEST PARKING SPACES
7:43:24PM RIGHT HERE.
7:43:24PM I'LL GET INTO THE WAIVERS HERE IN A MINUTE.
7:43:28PM THIS IS KIND OF THE SPIRIT OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
7:43:33PM AGAIN, IN KEEPING WITH THIS WHOLE WESTSHORE KIND OF MATURING
7:43:37PM AND GROWING AND BECOMING A MORE SOPHISTICATED PLACE, WE KIND
7:43:39PM OF WENT WITH THE REALLY COOL, MODERN, KIND OF SOPHISTICATED
7:43:42PM HIP LOOK, IF WE SAY SO OURSELVES.
7:43:45PM IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO, WHO ELSE IS GOING TO?
7:43:48PM WE THINK IT IS A REALLY COOL LOOK.
7:43:50PM VERY MODERN.
7:43:50PM WE'RE PULLING THAT TOP FLOOR BACK AND DO ROOFTOP BALCONIES
7:43:55PM FOR THE FIRST PART OF THAT, AGAIN, TO ENGAGE THE UNITS AND
7:43:58PM THE LIVING SPACES WITH THE PUBLIC REALM AND WITH THE STREET.
7:44:02PM IT ALSO SOFTENS THAT WHOLE TOP EDGE.
7:44:06PM IT REALLY SOFTENS THE SPACE.
7:44:09PM THIS SHOWS THE LOW WALLS IN THE FRONT WITH THE EDGE AND THEN
7:44:13PM THE LITTLE PORCH AREAS THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IN THE
7:44:16PM FRONT, AGAIN, ENGAGE THE PEDESTRIAN AND THE STREETSCAPE.
7:44:20PM YOU CAN SEE THAT THE BUILDING IS IN THE BACK BEHIND THERE.
7:44:24PM AGAIN, I'M GOING TO GET INTO THIS A LITTLE MORE.
7:44:29PM WHERE WE ARE PROPOSING OUR SEVEN-FOOT SETBACK AS OPPOSED TO
7:44:33PM THE 15, WHICH THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY SUGGESTS, WHAT WE'RE
7:44:37PM DOING IS WE'RE DOING THE SEVEN FOOT HERE, BUT THEN WHERE THE
7:44:41PM THIRD FLOOR UNIT IS, WE'RE PULLING THAT WHOLE SECTION OF THE
7:44:43PM THIRD FLOOR BACK 12 FEET AWAY FROM THAT SETBACK LINE SO THAT
7:44:49PM WE HAVE A SOFTER RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE
7:44:52PM ADJACENT PARCEL.
7:44:53PM AND THERE'S ONE BIG OL' OAK TREE RIGHT BACK THERE, IT'S OFF
7:44:58PM OUR SITE, BUT WE'RE KEEPING THE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE
7:45:03PM SEPARATION AND DISTANCE FROM IT RIGHT HERE.
7:45:06PM AND JUST ANOTHER VIEW OF THE UNIT, THIS IS THAT ONE-LANE
7:45:14PM EXIT, AND THEN HERE'S THAT TWO-STORY WITH THAT THIRD
7:45:18PM SETBACK.
7:45:18PM I'D LIKE TO GO TO THE WAIVER REQUEST OF THE FIVE WAIVER
7:45:36PM REQUESTS.
7:45:36PM THE FIRST ONE IS THE FRONT SETBACK.
7:45:38PM AGAIN, I THINK I KIND OF ADDRESSED THAT IN TERMS OF CREATING
7:45:41PM A MORE URBAN PEDESTRIAN KIND OF PLACE AND TRYING TO BRING,
7:45:45PM INTENTIONALLY BRING THE BUILDING CLOSER TO THE STREET TO
7:45:48PM CREATE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLE AND SIDEWALK AND
7:45:50PM BUILDING AND TO DEVELOP THAT LITTLE COURTYARD SPACE IN THE
7:45:54PM FRONT HERE AND THE LOW WALL.
7:45:55PM AGAIN, THE THREE FOOT THAT WAS IN YOUR REPORT IS THE LOW
7:45:58PM WALL, NOT THE BUILDING.
7:45:59PM THE BUILDING IS AT 15 FEET.
7:46:02PM ALSO, RELATIVE TO THAT SETBACK ISSUE IS NORTH A HAS AN
7:46:09PM 80-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS SIGNIFICANTLY
7:46:13PM LARGER THAN THE TYPICAL TAMPA 50-FOOT, MOST RESIDENTIAL
7:46:16PM STREETS IN TAMPA PROBABLY HAVE 50-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
7:46:19PM SO THESE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE 15 FEET FURTHER BACK FROM THE
7:46:24PM CENTER LINE OF THE STREET THEN THEY WOULD NORMALLY BE JUST
7:46:29PM BECAUSE WE HAVE AN 80-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE STREET
7:46:32PM WHICH IS A REALLY BROAD, BIG WIDE.
7:46:34PM BRINGING THESE UNITS FORWARD ONCE AGAIN WILL NOT IMPACT THE
7:46:37PM STREET AS WE HAVE 30-FOOT WIDER RIGHT-OF-WAY THAN WE
7:46:42PM TYPICALLY WOULD HAVE ON A RESIDENTIAL STREET.
7:46:44PM THE SECOND WAIVER REQUEST IS THE SIDEWALK.
7:46:53PM FIVE FOOT IS THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENT.
7:47:00PM FOUR FOOT IS OKAY WITH THE CITY, WITH THE NORMAL ZONING.
7:47:04PM IT WOULD BE THIS SIDEWALK AND THEN THE ACCESS TO THESE UNITS
7:47:08PM TO THE BACK HERE.
7:47:09PM BECAUSE WE'RE PROVIDING A VERY PROPER KIND OF APPROACH AND
7:47:14PM ENTRANCE TO THOSE UNITS THAT ARE NOT FACING, THAT ARE NOT
7:47:17PM IMMEDIATELY ON THE STREET.
7:47:19PM I'M SURE YOU ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE DOUBLE FACING
7:47:22PM BUILDINGS YOU SEE ALL OVER SOUTH TAMPA THAT HAVE THE GARAGE
7:47:25PM AND THEN THE PAVING IN THE MIDDLE AND YOU HAVE TO WALK DOWN
7:47:29PM THE DRIVE TO GET IN THE FRONT DOORS.
7:47:31PM IT'S JUST AWFUL.
7:47:33PM VERY UNDIGNIFIED AND IT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE.
7:47:37PM WE'LL HAVE A VERY PROPER SIDEWALK WITH PAVERS OR SOME KIND
7:47:42PM OF NICE PAVEMENT TO DISTINGUISH THE PEDESTRIAN REALM FROM
7:47:45PM THE AUTO REALM.
7:47:46PM WE ARE PROPOSING IT TO BE FOUR FEET, NOT FIVE FEET.
7:47:49PM WE COULD MAKE THAT FIVE FEET THE SQUEEZE LOCATION REALLY IS
7:47:52PM RIGHT HERE WHERE WE'RE ALONG THIS SIDE PROPERTY LINE.
7:47:56PM WE LEFT A THREE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER UP AGAINST WHAT WE'RE
7:47:59PM PROPOSING TO BE THE PVC FENCE INSTEAD OF THE BLOCK WALL.
7:48:03PM THE THREE FOOT WOULD ALLOW US TO DO LIKE BAMBOO OR SOME KIND
7:48:07PM OF A TALL, GREEN BUFFER PLANT MATERIAL IN THERE.
7:48:10PM THE SIDEWALK, THE DRIVE LANE, AND THEN WE'VE ALSO LEFT
7:48:14PM ANOTHER THREE-FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE SIDE OF THAT TOWN
7:48:19PM HOUSE UNIT ON THE WEST SIDE.
7:48:21PM SO WE COULD CUT THOSE LANDSCAPE AREAS DOWN TO MAKE THAT
7:48:25PM SIDEWALK FOUR FEET.
7:48:26PM WE THOUGHT IN BALANCE IT MADE MORE SENSE TO HAVE A LITTLE
7:48:30PM MORE GREEN AND LITTLE NARROWER SIDEWALK THAT STILL WORKS FOR
7:48:33PM ADA AND HANDICAP AND ACCESSIBILITY.
7:48:35PM THAT WAS OUR LOGIC ON THE SIDEWALK.
7:48:39PM NUMBER THREE WAS, AGAIN, THE VEHICLE USE BUFFER AREA
7:48:43PM REQUIREMENT.
7:48:43PM WHEN WE WERE FIRST DOING THE OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR WESTSHORE,
7:48:49PM THOSE OF YOU BEEN AROUND A WHILE, PROBABLY REMEMBER MARGARET
7:48:53PM VIZZI.
7:48:54PM SHE WAS A POWERFUL WOMAN IN HER DAY, AND --
7:48:59PM >> IS, IS.
7:49:00PM >> IS STILL?
7:49:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SHE'S ON THE PHONE.
7:49:04PM SHE WANTS TO TALK TO YOU.
7:49:07PM >> WELL, SHE WAS REALLY CONCERNED.
7:49:09PM SHE HATED THE WHOLE IDEA OF THE BUILDING COMING TO THE FRONT
7:49:13PM AND THE PARKING GOING TO THE REAR BECAUSE SHE THOUGHT THAT
7:49:16PM WAS GOING TO IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
7:49:18PM SHE WANTED THE PARKING IN THE FRONT.
7:49:23PM THAT'S THIS 25-FOOT BUFFER THING OR THE 25-FOOT SETBACK AND
7:49:26PM THAT 15-FOOT BUFFER THING REALLY CAME FROM HER BECAUSE SHE
7:49:29PM WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THESE BIG, BRIGHT, LIGHTED PARKING LOTS.
7:49:34PM AND SERVICE AREAS FOR GARAGES AND PARKING GARAGES ABUTTING
7:49:38PM PEOPLE'S BACKYARDS.
7:49:39PM THAT WAS HER BIG CONCERN FOR THE BIG BUFFER, BIG SETBACK
7:49:43PM AREA, AND IT WAS ONLY PROPOSED AND WRITTEN FOR SINGLE-FAMILY
7:49:49PM AND NOT MULTIFAMILY.
7:49:50PM IS MY TIME UP?
7:49:52PM >> 30 SECONDS.
7:49:53PM >> OH, GREAT.
7:49:54PM WHAT WE'RE THINKING IS THIS IS A SINGLE LANE EXIT CORRIDOR
7:50:01PM OVER HERE.
7:50:01PM IT'S ONE LANE.
7:50:03PM WE THINK IT'S MINIMAL, MINIMAL IMPACT.
7:50:06PM IT'S NOT A BIG, BRIGHT LIGHTED PARKING LOT.
7:50:08PM WE DON'T THINK IT WILL REALLY HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON
7:50:10PM THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS.
7:50:11PM THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO WE COULD MAKE THAT FIRE DEPARTMENT
7:50:14PM TRUCK ACCESS ONLY AND NOT EVEN HAVE THAT, AN EXIT CORRIDOR.
7:50:19PM >>LUIS VIERA: DO YOU NEED ONE MORE MINUTE, SIR?
7:50:22PM >> COULD I.
7:50:22PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION FOR ONE MINUTE?
7:50:24PM >> SO MOVED.
7:50:24PM >>LUIS VIERA: I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:50:27PM A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
7:50:28PM ALL IN FAVOR?
7:50:29PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:50:30PM GO AHEAD.
7:50:31PM >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
7:50:32PM AND THEN THE OTHER WAS THE BUILDING SETBACK.
7:50:35PM AGAIN, THIS GOES BACK TO THAT AREA IN THE REAR BACK HERE
7:50:41PM WHERE, AGAIN, IT'S 15-FOOT.
7:50:43PM THAT WAS A MARGARET VIZZI THING, AGAIN, TRYING TO KEEP THE
7:50:46PM COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
7:50:46PM THE OVERLAY DISTRICT REALLY WAS VERY FOCUSED ON THE
7:50:49PM COMMERCIAL STUFF, NOT SO MUCH ON RESIDENTIAL.
7:50:51PM IT'S PROBABLY OUR FAULT.
7:50:52PM WE PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN THAT AND DEFINED THAT A
7:50:56PM LITTLE BETTER.
7:50:56PM SO THE RESIDENTIAL, WE'RE KEEPING WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
7:50:58PM SEVEN FOOT RESIDENTIAL AND THEN TAKING THAT THIRD FLOOR BACK
7:51:01PM TO TRY TO MITIGATE AND SOFTEN THAT.
7:51:04PM THIS IS THE SETBACK ISSUE WITH THE 15-FOOT.
7:51:07PM AND THEN THE LAST ONE WERE THOSE REAR UNITS NOT FACING THE
7:51:12PM RIGHT-OF-WAY.
7:51:12PM THEY ARE FACING THAT DRIVE AREA IN THE BACK.
7:51:17PM SO THESE UNITS, THEIR DOORS DON'T TECHNICALLY FACE THE
7:51:21PM RIGHT-OF-WAY.
7:51:22PM WE DON'T REALLY SEE THAT AS A BIG NEGATIVE NECESSARILY OR
7:51:24PM HAVE ANY KIND OF NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD
7:51:28PM COMMUNITY.
7:51:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:51:31PM YES, SIR.
7:51:33PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
7:51:34PM OKAY.
7:51:35PM THANK YOU, SIR.
7:51:36PM ANYONE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM NUMBER 6?
7:51:39PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:51:44PM A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
7:51:46PM ALL IN FAVOR?
7:51:46PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:51:47PM COUNCILMAN GUDES, CAN YOU TAKE ITEM NUMBER 6, SIR?
7:51:51PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
7:51:59PM CONSIDERATION.
7:51:59PM AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
7:52:02PM 4515 AND 4519 WEST NORTH A STREET, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
7:52:06PM FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM
7:52:09PM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL,
7:52:13PM SINGLE-FAMILY) AND RM-18 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY) TO PD
7:52:18PM (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, ATTACHED
7:52:21PM AND DETACHED); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7:52:30PM >> ALONG WITH THE WAIVERS.
7:52:31PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALONG WITH THE REVISION SHEETS.
7:52:34PM >>LUIS VIERA: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
7:52:35PM MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
7:52:37PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
7:52:39PM ALL IN FAVOR?
7:52:39PM ANY OPPOSED?
7:52:40PM >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7:52:42PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION TO BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
7:52:45PM 9:30 A.M.
7:52:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
7:52:48PM NEXT WE GO DOWN TO ITEM NUMBER 8.
7:52:51PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
7:52:53PM ITEM NUMBER 8 IS REZ 19-36.
7:52:56PM THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 308 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
7:52:59PM THE REQUEST IS FROM CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT,
7:53:03PM TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PERMITTED USE OF BUSINESS
7:53:07PM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
7:53:08PM THE APPLICANT IS HEATHER FERRILL.
7:53:16PM >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
7:53:18PM STAFF.
7:53:18PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
7:53:19PM WE'RE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT
7:53:23PM CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
7:53:29PM THE SUBJECT SITE DUE TO THE LAND USE CATEGORY IS WITH AN
7:53:35PM IDENTIFIED MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
7:53:37PM THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY DOES HAVE ACCESS TO TRANSIT.
7:53:41PM THERE IS TRANSIT ON THIS PORTION OF HOWARD.
7:53:46PM THE PROPERTY IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL D EVACUATION
7:53:50PM ZONE.
7:53:50PM ON TO THE AERIAL, HERE'S THE SUBJECT SITE.
7:54:02PM IT'S AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST FIG STREET AND NORTH
7:54:06PM HOWARD.
7:54:08PM THIS IS THE GLAZER JCC FACILITY.
7:54:12PM AND THEN YOU'VE GOT ACTUALLY ACROSS THE STREET IS THE RAY
7:54:17PM WILLIAMS FUNERAL HOME RIGHT THERE.
7:54:18PM PART OF THIS CORRIDOR HAS A MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL AND LIGHT
7:54:24PM OFFICE USES, AND THEN THERE'S MORE INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL AS
7:54:29PM YOU GET DOWN TOWARD KENNEDY.
7:54:30PM YOU CAN SEE THE MAJORITY OF DEVELOPMENT OFF THE CORRIDORS IS
7:54:33PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
7:54:34PM ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE AND ACTUALLY
7:54:42PM PROPERTIES ALL SURROUNDING THE SITE, INCLUDING TO THE WEST
7:54:46PM ARE ALL IN THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE
7:54:50PM CATEGORY.
7:54:51PM IT DROPS OFF AS YOU GO WEST INTO THE RESIDENTIAL 20, AND
7:54:56PM THEN THERE'S ACTUALLY MORE INTENSITY DOWN ON KENNEDY
7:55:00PM BOULEVARD.
7:55:02PM THIS LIGHT PURPLE IS THE URBAN MIXED USE 60.
7:55:05PM AND THEN TO THE NORTH IN THE RED, THAT'S THAT COMMUNITY
7:55:08PM COMMERCIAL 35.
7:55:10PM THE RED ALLOWS CONSIDERATION FOR COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES.
7:55:14PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS DESIGNATED, AS I SAID, THE COMMUNITY
7:55:23PM MIXED USE 35.
7:55:24PM THAT CATEGORY ALLOWS A BROAD RANGE OF USES INCLUDING RETAIL,
7:55:31PM GENERAL COMMERCIAL, SERVICE, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES.
7:55:34PM THE AREA DOES HAVE THAT MIX OF USES.
7:55:36PM THERE'S MORE INTENSITY TO THE SOUTH.
7:55:38PM OVERALL, THE PROPOSED REZONING TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO
7:55:45PM ALLOW FOR AN OFFICE USE IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE TO THE
7:55:50PM SURROUNDING USES AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH MANY OF THE
7:55:52PM POLICIES WITHIN THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
7:55:55PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
7:55:58PM FINDS THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE
7:56:00PM IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
7:56:03PM THANK YOU.
7:56:12PM >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
7:56:14PM COUNCIL, AS MENTIONED, THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED CG
7:56:17PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
7:56:18PM SO THE REQUEST IS FOR A PD.
7:56:21PM THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE.
7:56:23PM THIS IS THE SITE.
7:56:27PM AND THIS IS HOWARD AVENUE, AND THIS IS FIG STREET.
7:56:41PM AND SO THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED.
7:56:43PM THERE IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE ON-SITE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY
7:56:46PM VACANT, AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO KEEP THAT EXISTING
7:56:49PM STRUCTURE SO THERE IS NO EXPANSION OF THAT FOOTPRINT
7:56:52PM PROPOSED.
7:56:52PM IT ACTUALLY -- THE LOT CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 4,792 SQUARE
7:56:58PM FEET.
7:56:59PM IT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH HOWARD AND
7:57:02PM FIG STREET.
7:57:02PM IT IS EAST OF ARMENIA AVENUE AND NORTH OF WEST B STREET.
7:57:07PM SO THE REQUEST PROPOSES THE USE OF 1,454-SQUARE-FOOT
7:57:12PM BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
7:57:13PM THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE,
7:57:20PM MAINTAINING AND PRESERVING THE EXISTING TREE THAT IS LOCATED
7:57:26PM SOUTH OF THE SITE.
7:57:27PM SO FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, A TOTAL OF FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE
7:57:33PM REQUIRED AND THREE SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
7:57:35PM THEY ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER FOR ONE SPACE, BUT YOU WILL SEE
7:57:39PM THAT THIS IS THE STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY, AND THE PARKING
7:57:43PM SPACES ARE LOCATED HERE WEST OF THE STRUCTURE.
7:57:46PM THIS TREE IS HERE, WHICH IS A 48-INCH OAK.
7:57:50PM AND THEIR PROVIDING THE PROTECTIVE RADIUS TO PROTECT THIS
7:57:54PM OAK TREE.
7:57:55PM AND SO THEY ARE LOSING A SPACE HERE.
7:57:57PM SO THEY ARE PROVIDING THREE SPACES THERE.
7:57:59PM SO THE SITE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN AN EFFORT TO PRESERVE THE
7:58:04PM EXISTING TREE THAT'S SOUTH OF THE SITE.
7:58:07PM THE SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
7:58:10PM IT IS ACTUALLY ALMOST CENTER TO THE DISTRICT, AND IT MUST
7:58:14PM ADHERE TO THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
7:58:17PM AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
7:58:18PM AND THIS IS THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE SITE.
7:58:26PM SO THIS IS THE SITE THAT'S HERE IN GREEN.
7:58:30PM THIS IS HOWARD AVENUE.
7:58:31PM AND THIS IS FIG STREET.
7:58:33PM THIS IS NORTH B STREET TO ORIENT YOU.
7:58:36PM SO THIS SITE ALONG HOWARD AVENUE IS PREDOMINANTLY CG,
7:58:41PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING.
7:58:43PM DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE IS A PD.
7:58:46PM THAT PD WAS APPROVED FOR THE SAME USE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
7:58:47PM OFFICE, YEARS AGO.
7:58:51PM FURTHER WEST OF THE SITE IS THE RM-16 RESIDENTIAL
7:58:53PM MULTIFAMILY ZONING.
7:58:55PM THIS IS ALSO FURTHER EAST OF THE SITE.
7:58:59PM THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
7:59:01PM AND THIS IS ON HOWARD AVENUE, FIG, AND THIS IS THE SITE
7:59:07PM OUTLINED IN RED.
7:59:08PM SO THE SITE IS SURROUNDED TO THE NORTH, TO THE EAST, AND TO
7:59:13PM THE SOUTH WITH COMMERCIAL USES, WEST OF THE SITE,
7:59:17PM RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.
7:59:18PM I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
7:59:24PM SO THIS IS THE SITE ON HOWARD.
7:59:27PM LOOKING WEST.
7:59:28PM THAT'S AT HOWARD AND FIG LOOKING SOUTHWEST AT THE SITE.
7:59:36PM THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE.
7:59:40PM THIS IS ON FIG.
7:59:42PM HEADING FURTHER SOUTH.
7:59:44PM THIS IS WHERE THE PARKING WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SITE.
7:59:47PM THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
7:59:52PM THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING WEST ON FIG.
7:59:57PM THAT'S NORTHWEST OF THE SITE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
8:00:02PM THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE, COMMERCIAL USE.
8:00:05PM AND THAT'S NORTHEAST CROSSING HOWARD.
8:00:08PM THAT'S EAST OF THE SITE ON HOWARD.
8:00:12PM FURTHER EAST.
8:00:15PM SOUTHEAST, AND THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
8:00:22PM THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF NORTH B.
8:00:24PM THIS IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE AND THAT'S THE VACANT PD
8:00:29PM THAT WAS MENTIONED, THAT WAS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS
8:00:30PM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
8:00:31PM SO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
8:00:35PM APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT THE APPLICABLE
8:00:39PM LAND DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS.
8:00:40PM SHOULD CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THIS APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED
8:00:45PM WAIVERS, THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BETWEEN
8:00:47PM FIRST AND SECOND READING.
8:00:49PM AND I HAVE THOSE MODIFICATIONS HERE, AND I'LL PROVIDE THEM
8:00:52PM TO YOU.
8:00:53PM AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
8:00:55PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
8:00:56PM ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
8:00:57PM THANK YOU.
8:00:59PM APPLICANT, PLEASE.
8:01:12PM >> GOOD EVENING, I'M GABRELA MUNOZ.
8:01:13PM I AM ACTUALLY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE APPLICANT --
8:01:13PM HEATHER FERRILL, DAVID FERRILL.
8:01:14PM >> I'M DAVID FERRILL.
8:01:16PM FERRILL CONSTRUCTION.
8:01:17PM I'M SORRY.
8:01:21PM THERE SEEMS TO BE A BIT OF INCONSISTENCY IN THE REPORT.
8:01:24PM WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS NEW CONSTRUCTION, NOT
8:01:28PM REHABILITATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION.
8:01:32PM WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SITE PLAN IS REFLECTIVE OF THE NEW
8:01:35PM BUILDING.
8:01:35PM I WOULD BE HAPPY TO GIVE YOU A BETTER ONE THAT FOCUSES IN.
8:01:42PM THAT'S THE BUILDING THAT WE ARE PROPOSING.
8:01:46PM OUR VRC HEARING, THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW,
8:01:51PM VACANT RESIDENTIAL.
8:01:53PM AND WE ARE PROPOSING TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.
8:01:56PM DEMOLITION PERMIT IN HAND FOR THAT BUILDING. AND WE HAD A
8:02:03PM MARCH 26th VRC HEARING.
8:02:08PM AS A RESULT OF THAT HEARING, WE WERE ABLE TO ADDRESS AND
8:02:09PM SATISFY ALL OF STAFF'S CONCERNS AS THEY ARE RELATED TO ALL
8:02:16PM THE ISSUES BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
8:02:20PM DISTRICT AND OUR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
8:02:23PM THERE'S ONE WAIVER, HOWEVER, THAT WE ARE REQUIRING, AND THAT
8:02:26PM IS FOR THAT ONE PARKING SPACE, AND THE FACT THAT THERE'S A
8:02:32PM LARGE OAK TREE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY TO THE
8:02:36PM SOUTH.
8:02:38PM AND THE FOLKS, NATURAL RESOURCES, MADE A REQUEST THAT WE
8:02:42PM HONOR WHAT THEIR MINIMUM DISTANCE AWAY FROM THAT TREE WOULD
8:02:46PM NORMALLY BE IN ORDER TO ENSURE ITS SURVIVAL.
8:02:49PM AND SO IN DOING THAT, WE HAVE LOST A PARKING SPACE, SO WE
8:02:57PM ARE AT THE REQUEST OF NATURAL RESOURCES HERE MAKING THAT
8:03:00PM WAIVER REQUEST.
8:03:01PM AND OTHER THAN THAT, WE DO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING
8:03:05PM STAFF HAS REQUESTED OF US.
8:03:07PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING ELSE?
8:03:09PM ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL FOR THE APPLICANTS?
8:03:11PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
8:03:14PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
8:03:15PM ON THAT SOUTHERN BOUNDARY, ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE
8:03:23PM THAT PVC FENCE --
8:03:24PM >> ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY, I DON'T BELIEVE WE ARE -- WE
8:03:29PM HAVE THAT LARGE SITE PLAN.
8:03:39PM [RUSTLING PAPERS]
8:03:40PM >> ACTUALLY, ONE OF THE REASONS WE HAVE LEFT THAT VACANT,
8:03:47PM AND FOR THAT SET BACK, FARTHER TO THE SOUTH A, BECAUSE OF
8:03:54PM THE TREE, AND B, IT WOULDN'T ALLOW WORK ON THE AIR
8:03:57PM REQUESTING UNIT.
8:03:58PM TO SERVICE IT.
8:04:06PM OH, THAT'S AN EXISTING -- THAT'S THE NEIGHBOR'S.
8:04:18PM >> WHAT IS YOUR NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH?
8:04:20PM >> VACANT LOT.
8:04:20PM >> VACANT LOT, YES, SIR.
8:04:23PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING FURTHER?
8:04:26PM THANK YOU.
8:04:27PM OKAY.
8:04:27PM NEXT WE GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
8:04:29PM [RUSTLING PAPERS] ANYONE WHO IS HERE FROM THE PUBLIC TO
8:04:32PM SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 8 PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME.
8:04:34PM >> MOTION TO CLOSE.
8:04:35PM >> SECOND.
8:04:35PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:04:38PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
8:04:41PM ALL IN FAVOR?
8:04:42PM ANY OPPOSED?
8:04:43PM DO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE TAKING THIS ITEM, SIR?
8:04:55PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SURE.
8:04:55PM ALL RIGHT.
8:04:56PM AS RELATED TO REZONING FILE 19-36, I MOVE AN ORDINANCE FOR
8:05:02PM FIRST READING, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
8:05:04PM VICINITY OF 308 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
8:05:08PM FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
8:05:10PM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD
8:05:13PM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, OFFICE,
8:05:16PM PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:05:18PM AND INCLUDING ANY REVISIONS AS OUTLINED ON THE REVISION
8:05:25PM SHEET.
8:05:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER
8:05:29PM A.SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
8:05:32PM ALL IN FAVOR?
8:05:32PM ANY OPPOSED?
8:05:33PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8:05:36PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
8:05:40PM 9:30 A.M.
8:05:43PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I SHOULD HAVE ASKED, ARE YOU FAMILIAR
8:05:45PM WITH THE REVISION SHEET?
8:05:48PM >> WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH IT.
8:05:51PM >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 9.
8:05:53PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:05:56PM ITEM NUMBER 9 IS REZ 19-37.
8:05:59PM IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3126 WEST FIELDER STREET,
8:06:04PM THE REQUEST FROM RS-50 TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH
8:06:06PM DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
8:06:08PM THE APPLICANT IS JOHN LUM AND STEVE MICHELINI.
8:06:13PM >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
8:06:17PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
8:06:18PM WE ARE DOWN IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DIRECT FOR THIS NEXT
8:06:23PM CASE.
8:06:27PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL
8:06:30PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:06:30PM THE CLOSEST RECREATION FACILITY IS THE SOUTH TAMPA YMCA
8:06:37PM APPROXIMATELY 700 YARDS FROM THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY.
8:06:40PM THE PROPERTY DOES HAVE ACCESS TO TRANSIT.
8:06:43PM THERE IS TRANSIT OUT ON DALE MABRY AND GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:06:46PM AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LEVEL D EVACUATION ZONE.
8:06:52PM ONTO THE AERIAL.
8:06:54PM THERE'S NOT MUCH TO SHOW HERE.
8:06:55PM ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
8:06:58PM THE SUBJECT SITE THERE ON FIELDER STREET.
8:07:02PM SOUTH MOUND AVENUE LOCATED TO THE WEST.
8:07:04PM BUT IT'S ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
8:07:08PM THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BACKS THAT UP.
8:07:11PM THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTY SURROUNDING IT IS
8:07:15PM RESIDENTIAL 10, FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
8:07:18PM THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM THAT RESIDENTIAL
8:07:21PM SINGLE-FAMILY 60 TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE
8:07:25PM DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
8:07:29PM THIS WOULD BE COMPATIBLE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AN AREA
8:07:34PM PLANNED FOR UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE UNDER THAT
8:07:38PM RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
8:07:41PM THE EXISTING DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS FRONTING THIS
8:07:44PM BLOCK OF WEST FIELDER STREET BETWEEN SOUTH MOUND AVENUE AND
8:07:48PM SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE IS 8.3 UNITS PER ACRE.
8:07:53PM PROPOSED PD WOULD ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION OF THOSE TWO
8:07:56PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELL UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE FOR
8:07:59PM AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 9.5 UNITS PER ACRE.
8:08:03PM WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH AGAIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 10.
8:08:06PM THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OF A SIMILAR FORM,
8:08:10PM HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
8:08:14PM APPROXIMATELY THE PROPOSED PD IS CONSISTENT AGAIN WITH THAT
8:08:17PM ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10.
8:08:21PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, YOUR COMMISSION STAFF FINDS
8:08:24PM THE PROPOSED PD BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE IMAGINE 2040
8:08:29PM TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
8:08:30PM THANK YOU.
8:08:35PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DAVID, WOULD YOU GO BACK TO THAT FIRST
8:08:37PM MAP, THE VERY FIRST ONE?
8:08:42PM >>DAVID HEY: THE VISION MAP.
8:08:45PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU PUT UP THIS A FEW TIMES TONIGHT.
8:08:49PM YOU HAVE THE CIRCLES THERE THAT SAY RAIL TRANSIT STATION.
8:08:53PM IS THERE SOMETHING I AM NOT AWARE OF YET?
8:08:56PM >>DAVID HEY: THE ADOPTED VISION MAP FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA
8:08:58PM IS BASICALLY THE IDEAL VISION FOR THE CITY ANTS REPRESENTS
8:09:07PM THAT AT THE TIME THAT THE VISION MAP WAS REFERENCED IN THE
8:09:13PM COMP PLAN, THAT THERE IS A WISH FOR THE CITY TO HAVE RAIL IN
8:09:20PM THAT CORRIDOR IN THE FUTURE.
8:09:21PM >> THEN WHAT, BRITT OWN PLAZA?
8:09:40PM >>DAVID HEY: THESE ARE REFERENCED.
8:09:42PM AT THE TIME THEY WERE LOOKING AT DOWN IN PORT TAMPA CITY,
8:09:48PM AND AGAIN AROUND THE GANDY CORRIDOR, AND USING THAT FOR RAIL
8:09:51PM LINE.
8:09:51PM BUT IT IS THE DIVISION MAP, FOR REFERENCE.
8:09:59PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, THANK YOU.
8:10:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:10:02PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:10:11PM COUNCIL, THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
8:10:14PM SINGLE-FAMILY, SO THIS REQUESTED PD WOULD ALLOW FOR
8:10:18PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
8:10:22PM THIS SITE IS ACTUALLY A PART OF OLD HOWARD SUBDIVISION.
8:10:33PM THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP FOR IT.
8:10:38PM THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS ATTACHED.
8:10:42PM THIS IS MOUND AVENUE.
8:10:44PM OCALA AVENUE.
8:10:47PM AND THE REQUEST FOR TWO 50 FOOT WIDE LOTS WITH THE FOLLOWING
8:10:53PM LOT AREA.
8:10:53PM LOT 12 WOULD CONSIST OF 4,536 SQUARE FEET AND LOT 13, 4,534
8:11:01PM SQUARE FEET.
8:11:02PM THE MINIMUM LOT RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT IS 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
8:11:08PM WITH A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 50 FEET.
8:11:10PM SO THE LOTS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER THAN SINGLE OWNERSHIP.
8:11:13PM THEY ARE ONE LOT.
8:11:16PM THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW THE PLATTED LOTS TO BE ESTABLISHED
8:11:19PM CONTAINING LESS THAN THE 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
8:11:23PM SO THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO
8:11:26PM DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.
8:11:28PM NO WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
8:11:37PM THIS IS THE ZONING ATLAS FOR THE PROPERTY.
8:11:40PM THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS MOUND AVENUE.
8:11:46PM OCALA. YOU CAN SEE THE SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH RS-50 ZONING
8:11:51PM WITH A COUPLE OF PDS TO THE EAST AND THEN TO THE SOUTHEAST.
8:11:55PM RS-60 IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THAT AREA.
8:12:02PM THIS IS THE AERIAL.
8:12:04PM OF THE PROPERTY.
8:12:05PM THAT'S THE SITE.
8:12:06PM THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED.
8:12:09PM THIS IS OCALA. AND IT'S SURROUNDED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY
8:12:12PM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
8:12:19PM AND THIS IS THE SITE.
8:12:23PM THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
8:12:26PM THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
8:12:29PM THIS IS DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SITE.
8:12:34PM ANOTHER VIEW OF THE EAST.
8:12:38PM AND MORE OF THE EAST.
8:12:41PM THIS IS COME BACK AROUND.
8:12:43PM THAT'S NORTHEAST OF THE SITE.
8:12:46PM THAT'S LOCATED NORTHEAST.
8:12:48PM THIS IS DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE.
8:12:53PM ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NORTH OF THE SITE.
8:13:00PM THIS IS NORTHWEST OF THE SITE.
8:13:01PM THIS VIEW LOOKING WEST ON Z-E-L-D-A.
8:13:07PM COME BACK AROUND THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
8:13:11PM WEST OF THE SITE.
8:13:13PM AND THIS IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE THAT'S ON OCALA.
8:13:17PM SOUTH OF THE SITE THERE ARE TWO LOTS, AND ONE IS VACANT AND
8:13:20PM UP WITH HAS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THE
8:13:22PM SITE.
8:13:25PM THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION, FIND THE REQUEST
8:13:28PM CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND
8:13:33PM IN THE EVENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THIS REQUEST SITE PLAN IS
8:13:37PM REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND I HAVE A SITE
8:13:39PM PLAN REVISION SHEET FOR THEM H.
8:13:44PM AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
8:13:45PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
8:13:48PM ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
8:13:50PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
8:13:52PM YOU HAVE THE MULTICOLORED SHEET FOR US?
8:13:56PM >>LACHONE DOCK: YES.
8:13:57PM I CAN HAND THAT OUT, ALSO.
8:14:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING FURTHER FROM COUNCIL?
8:14:27PM APPLICANT?
8:14:28PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: REPRESENTING PETITIONER.
8:14:31PM I THINK ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS YOU CAN LOOK AT
8:14:34PM HERE IS -- IT SAYS 44% BUT I THINK IT'S MORE THAN THAT.
8:14:42PM IT'S 94.
8:14:43PM THERE'S 102 LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION.
8:14:46PM AND THEY WERE PLATTED AT 50 FEET BY 90 FEET IN DEPTH.
8:14:51PM SO NONE OF THEM MEET THE RS-50 DESIGNATION WHICH THEY ARE
8:14:56PM CURRENTLY ZONED.
8:14:57PM IN OUR CASE, WE ARE REQUESTING TO SPLIT THOSE TO CREATE TWO
8:15:03PM DEVELOPMENT LOTS THAT MEET THE RS-50 STANDARDS, AND ALSO
8:15:06PM MEET ALL OF THE RS-50 DEVELOPMENT CODES REGARDING SETBACKS.
8:15:14PM WE HAVE A COUPLE OF CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED, AND
8:15:17PM ONE OF THEM IS TO REALIGN AND MOVE THE SIDEWALK IN THE FRONT
8:15:22PM TO PROTECT THE 38-INCH OAK.
8:15:24PM I'LL SHOW THAT TO YOU ON THE SITE PLAN.
8:15:31PM THERE'S AN OAK TREE ON THE FRONT.
8:15:33PM WE WERE SHOWING A SIDEWALK.
8:15:35PM AND THAT WILL BE RELOCATED AND COORDINATED WITH THE NATURAL
8:15:38PM RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE EXACTLY HOW WE DEAL WITH
8:15:42PM THAT.
8:15:42PM AND THEN THERE'S TWO OTHER OAK TREES IN THE REAR THAT ARE
8:15:46PM OFF-SITE, BUT WE WILL STILL BE MEETING ALL THE SETBACK
8:15:52PM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY.
8:15:53PM WE ARE PLANNING TWO CAR GARAGE FOR EACH UNIT AND TWO STORAGE
8:15:57PM SPACES ON THE OUTSIDE WITHIN OUR PROPERTY LINE.
8:16:01PM YOU SEE THE PROPERTY LINE IS RIGHT THERE.
8:16:04PM AND SO WE HAVE THE APRON.
8:16:07PM NONE OF THE CARS WILL BE EXTENDING BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE.
8:16:14PM IF YOU LOOK AT THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION, AS I SAID, THERE'S
8:16:18PM 102 LOTS.
8:16:19PM ALL OF THEM ARE AT 50 FEET BY 90 FEET.
8:16:22PM THERE'S ONLY A FEW LOTS THAT ARE DOUBLE LOTS.
8:16:26PM THIS IS ONE OF THEM.
8:16:28PM THIS ONE WAS A DOUBLE LOT THAT WAS CONVERTED INTO PD TO
8:16:31PM ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT.
8:16:33PM ALL THE OTHER LOTS UNDER SINGLE OWNERSHIP COULD BE DEVELOPED
8:16:37PM AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITHOUT COMING TO YOU.
8:16:42PM ALL OF THE DOUBLE LOTS WILL HAVE TO COME TO YOU IN THE
8:16:46PM REDEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE-FAMILY.
8:16:51PM THERE'S A SPECIFIC CRITERIA THAT YOU HAVE TO MEET REGARDING
8:16:56PM THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
8:16:58PM AND THE FIRST ONE IS TO PROVIDE DESIGN, FLEXIBILITY, AND
8:17:02PM PROMOTE THE PLAN, DIVERSIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT INTO
8:17:06PM THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:17:06PM SINCE MOST OF THESE PROPERTIES ARE ALREADY 50 FEET WIDE AND
8:17:10PM DEVELOPED AT 50-FOOT WIDE LOTS, AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS
8:17:14PM THE SAME AS THOSE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS THAT ALREADY EXIST.
8:17:18PM ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS IS PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT AND
8:17:21PM SUSTAINABLE USE OF THE LAND USE AND THE STRUCTURE.
8:17:24PM WE HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT EXISTS THERE, AND AGAIN, ON THIS
8:17:28PM PROJECT LIKE THE OTHER PROJECTS, IF THEY ARE FOUND TO BE
8:17:31PM INSUFFICIENT AND IN NEED TO BE UPGRADED THIS PROPERTY WILL
8:17:35PM HAVE TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE WATER LINES, BOTH ON-SITE
8:17:40PM AND OFF-SITE, AND WE WILL ALSO HAVE TO INCREASE THE SEWER
8:17:43PM LINES IN THE EVENT THAT THEY ARE INSUFFICIENT. IF THE FIRE
8:17:46PM DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT THEY NEED ADDITIONAL FIRE LINES
8:17:48PM OR SIZE INCREASE IN FIRE LINES OR FIRE HYDRANTS, THEY WILL
8:17:53PM HAVE TO IMPROVE AND INSTALL THOSE AS WELL.
8:17:57PM THE SECOND ITEM IS TO ALLOW THE INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENT
8:18:01PM LAND USES AND DENSITY. THIS DOES NOT CHANGE THE DENSITY
8:18:03PM THAT WE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED HERE.
8:18:05PM IT'S DESIGNATED AS RESIDENTIAL 10 AND THIS IS WITHIN THE
8:18:08PM RESIDENTIAL 10.
8:18:10PM AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS ALREADY DETERMINED THAT AND
8:18:11PM INDICATED THAT WE WERE CONSISTENT WITH THAT.
8:18:16PM PROVIDE A PROCEDURE WHICH RELATES TO DESIGN, WE WILL BE
8:18:19PM COMPLYING WITH THE SAME DEVELOPMENT DESIGN THAT IS IN THE
8:18:22PM NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY, WHICH IS THE 50-FOOT LOTS AND MEETING
8:18:25PM THE 50-FOOT STANDARD.
8:18:27PM WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR WAIVERS OF SETBACKS, FRONT, SIDES OR
8:18:31PM REAR.
8:18:32PM ALONG WITH THE CHANGES IN TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS WILL
8:18:33PM DICTATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE PROPERTIES.
8:18:39PM THE CITY STAFF HAS FOUND IT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THAT.
8:18:41PM THIS IS A RELATIVELY SMALL TRACT AND REESTABLISHES, AS
8:18:46PM LACHONE DOCK ALREADY POINTED OUT, THE PREVIOUS PLAT AND
8:18:50PM ORIGINAL STANDARDS THAT WERE INCORPORATED INTO THE
8:18:53PM SUBDIVISION AT THE TIME.
8:18:54PM ENCOURAGE THE FLEXIBLE USE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT.
8:18:59PM THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT IN A PD PROCESS, WE HAVE DONE
8:19:03PM THAT, AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF DESIGN AND THE MAXIMIZATION OF
8:19:07PM THE PROPERTY AND SAVING THE OAK, RELOCATING THE SIDEWALK,
8:19:11PM PROVIDING FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S REQUIRED WHEN
8:19:17PM MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT IS PART OF THE PD PROCESS.
8:19:20PM ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE, LOCATION, CHARACTER
8:19:23PM AND COMPATIBILITY OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:19:25PM WE ALREADY POINTED OUT TO YOU MOST OF THE HOUSES IN THIS
8:19:28PM NEIGHBORHOOD ARE BUILT ON 50-FOOT LOTS.
8:19:30PM THEY DON'T MEET THE DEPTH REQUIREMENT.
8:19:32PM SO IT'S THE DEPTH THAT'S THE ISSUE.
8:19:38PM INSTEAD OF TRADITIONAL 50 BY 100 SO EVERY ONE OF THEM IS
8:19:42PM APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET SHORT ON THE DEPTH THAT'S NORMALLY
8:19:45PM REQUIRED IN A RESIDENTIAL RS-50 DESIGNATION.
8:19:49PM PROMOTE THE MORE DESIRABLE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENTS
8:19:52PM IN AND PARKS AVAILABLE WITHIN SHORT WALKING DISTANCE.
8:19:57PM IN-FILL PROVIDES FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING WHICH IS BADLY
8:19:59PM NEEDED.
8:19:59PM AND IT ALSO IS COMPLIANT WITH THE STREETSCAPES THAT ARE
8:20:03PM ALREADY AVAILABLE IN THIS AREA.
8:20:05PM PROMOTE THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES.
8:20:07PM THERE'S A REDEVELOPMENT OCCURRING, AND WHEN THE IS COMING
8:20:13PM DOWN REDEVELOPMENT IS ALSO ENCOURAGING NEW DEVELOPMENT,
8:20:16PM WHICH IS INTENSIFYING THE USE OF THE LAND, BUT IT'S ALSO
8:20:21PM COMPATIBLE WITH THE SETBACKS AND THE STREETSCAPE.
8:20:24PM IF YOU ARE DRIVING BY YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TELL THE
8:20:26PM DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS HOUSE AND ANY OTHER HOUSE DEVELOPED
8:20:29PM ON THE STREET OR WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION.
8:20:32PM PROMOTE THE RETENTION AND REUSE OF THE BUILDING STOCK.
8:20:41PM IN THIS CASE IT'S PROMOTING REUSE AND REESTABLISHMENT OF
8:20:44PM EXISTING SUBDIVISION PLANS AS THEY WERE ESTABLISHED
8:20:50PM ORIGINALLY.
8:20:54PM LACHONE WENT THROUGH AND DETERMINED THE DESIGNATION OF
8:20:56PM WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS COMPATIBLE WITH ALL OF THE SURROUNDING
8:20:59PM PROPERTIES.
8:21:00PM AND WHEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED THAT IT WAS
8:21:02PM COMPATIBLE WITH THE LAND USE CODE AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT,
8:21:05PM WE AGREE WITH THAT, AND WE ARE GRATEFUL THAT THAT
8:21:09PM DESIGNATION WAS APPLIED FOR US ON THIS PROPERTY.
8:21:12PM AND BUT FOR THE FACT THAT WAS TEN FEET SHORT OF THE DEPTH,
8:21:15PM WE WOULDN'T BE HERE TONIGHT REQUESTING DESIGNATION FROM YOU
8:21:19PM FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
8:21:21PM I BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE MET THE SPIRIT AND THE INTENT OF THE
8:21:23PM CODE, AND ALL THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, AND WE
8:21:27PM RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
8:21:29PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:21:30PM ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
8:21:41PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LOOKING AT THE AERIAL AND NOT REALLY
8:21:43PM SEEING ANY INDICATION OF SIDEWALK, ON EITHER SIDE OF
8:21:46PM FIELDER, IS THAT YOUR OBSERVATION?
8:21:50PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
8:21:51PM WE STILL HAVE TO PROVIDE THEM.
8:21:55PM PER THE CODE.
8:21:56PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, I KNOW WHAT MY QUESTION IS, ON
8:21:58PM EITHER SIDE OF YOU THERE'S NO SIDEWALK, CORRECT?
8:22:02PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO, SIR.
8:22:04PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THERE'S NONE ACROSS THE STREET
8:22:05PM EITHER?
8:22:17PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S UNFORTUNATE YOU HAVE TO BUILD A
8:22:21PM SIDEWALK ALONG THERE, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF
8:22:24PM TRAFFIC UP AND DOWN BETWEEN MacDILL AND HIMES, TO GET TO
8:22:29PM PUBLIX AND STUFF
8:22:30PM BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE GOT A BIG OAK TREE THERE, AND YOU
8:22:39PM WANT TO SAVE THE TREE.
8:22:40PM OKAY.
8:22:41PM AND MS. DOCK, I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR YOU.
8:22:45PM THANK YOU.
8:22:46PM SO MR. MICHELINI'S LAST COMMENT WAS BUT FOR THE FACT THAT
8:22:50PM THIS IS 50 BY 90 INSTEAD OF I GUESS 100 BY 90 INSTEAD OF 100
8:22:56PM BY 100, THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE HERE.
8:22:59PM THEY COULD JUST DO A LOT SPLIT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT,
8:23:01PM CORRECT?
8:23:02PM >>LACHONE DOCK: CORRECT.
8:23:05PM LACHONE DOCK, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:23:08PM BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IS ZONED RESIDENTIAL 50, RESIDENTIAL IS
8:23:14PM REQUIRED DIRECTLY TO DEVELOPMENT.
8:23:16PM BUT WE HAVE A 50-FOOT WIDTH, AND NEED AT LEAST 100 FEET OF
8:23:22PM DEPTH.
8:23:22PM THEY HAVE THE WIDTH, BUT JUST ADOPT HAVE THE DEPTH.
8:23:26PM AND ALL OF THE PROPERTIES WERE PLATTED THAT WAY, WHERE ALL
8:23:31PM OF THESE IN THIS BLOCK AND ALL THE BLOCKS HERE.
8:23:38PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T WANT TO GO INTO THIS IN GREAT
8:23:40PM DETAIL.
8:23:40PM WE RAN INTO THIS RECENTLY IN AN YBOR CASE, A 90-FOOT LOT,
8:23:45PM AND THEN THEY WENT AND SAID, WELL, LET'S VACATE THE ALLEY,
8:23:49PM THAT WILL GIVE THEM AN ADDITIONAL TEN FEET, ET CETERA, AND
8:23:51PM THAT GAVE THEM A BUILDABLE LOT.
8:23:53PM SO THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO DO A PD.
8:23:56PM HERE THEY DON'T HAVE AN ALLEY OPTION SO THAT'S WHY THEY ARE
8:23:59PM HERE WITH A PD.
8:24:00PM TO ME IT SEEMS LIKE A BIT OF WASTE, BUT A LOT OF MONEY
8:24:04PM BECAUSE I KNOW A PD COSTS A FAIR AMOUNT OF MONEY.
8:24:07PM AND FAIR AMOUNT OF TIME.
8:24:09PM TO GO THROUGH THIS.
8:24:12PM I WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN YOUR MIND TO SEND BACK TO MS. COYLE
8:24:17PM THAT PERHAPS WE NEED TO VISIT THESE KINDS OF SITUATIONS.
8:24:20PM I KNOW WE USED TO HAVE THE AGE, GOT RID OF THE AGE, NOT
8:24:24PM NECESSARILY ADVOCATING TO BRING IT BACK BUT I THINK WE CAN
8:24:27PM DO PERHAPS A LITTLE MORE CREATIVE ON THESE TYPES OF
8:24:30PM SITUATIONS.
8:24:31PM >>LACHONE DOCK: SURE.
8:24:33PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORT OF A BIG FOOTNOTE, NOT SPECIFIC TO
8:24:36PM THIS PETITION, MR. MICHELINI.
8:24:40PM >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:24:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I THINK ABOUT 8 OR 12 YEARS AGO, WE DID
8:24:50PM A SIDEWALK ORDINANCE OVER AGAIN, AND AS LONG AS MR.
8:24:56PM DINGFELDER IS ADDRESSING THAT, THERE ARE NO SIDEWALKS ON
8:24:59PM EITHER SIDE OF THE ROAD.
8:25:02PM ONE BLOCK, FIVE BLOCKS, EIGHT BLOCKS.
8:25:09PM BECAUSE ARE YOU THE PETITIONER REQUIRED TO PUT MONEY INTO
8:25:13PM THE SIDEWALK FUND OR TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK?
8:25:16PM >>LACHONE DOCK: WE ARE --
8:25:20PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: WE ARE REQUIRED TO EITHER BUILD IT OR
8:25:22PM PUT IT INTO THE SIDEWALK --
8:25:27PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND MY MIND IS NOT EXACTLY TO THE DATE.
8:25:29PM I KNOW IT WAS SOME TIME BACK.
8:25:31PM AND THE REASON FOR THIS, ARE WE REALLY SAYING SOMEBODY IS
8:25:35PM GOING TO SEE A SIDEWALK, AND AT SOME POINT FOR THE CITY
8:25:38PM THERE'S A DITCH AND THEN A SIDEWALK AND IT GOES 60 FEET AND
8:25:42PM STOPS.
8:25:42PM SO SOMEBODY IS GOING TO JUMP A DITCH, GET ON THE SIDEWALK,
8:25:45PM WALK 50 FEET AND THEN JUMP BACK AND WALK IN THE STREET?
8:25:49PM IT'S NOT YOU THAT I AM TALKING ABOUT.
8:25:51PM SO THAT'S WHAT WE USED WAY BACK.
8:25:54PM AGAIN, I DON'T REMEMBER THE DATE.
8:25:55PM AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
8:25:57PM BUT WE DID HAVE SOME AMENDMENT TO THE SIDEWALK, AND THERE'S
8:26:00PM SIDEWALKS ALL OVER THE CITY, AND YOU CAN WALK INTO, AND WHEN
8:26:03PM YOU GET TO THE END YOU HIT A WALL.
8:26:07PM THERE ARE SIDEWALKS IN THE CITY IN THE MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK,
8:26:09PM THERE'S AN OAK TREE, AND YOU WALK UP, GOT TO STOP, GOT TO GO
8:26:13PM AROUND THE OAK TREE, ALONG THE STREET, AND GET BACK.
8:26:17PM THERE'S SOME THAT HAVE UTILITY POLES.
8:26:19PM BECAUSE I REMEMBER WORKING ON THAT.
8:26:21PM AND I JUST DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT DATE.
8:26:24PM BUT THE MONEY HAS GOT TO STAY, AND YOU PAY TO THE SIDEWALK
8:26:35PM FUND IN THAT DISTRICT.
8:26:37PM WE DID CHANGE THAT.
8:26:38PM >>LACHONE DOCK: IN THE DISTRICT, YES.
8:26:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
8:26:43PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
8:26:44PM THANK YOU.
8:26:44PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: IN THIS CASE THERE ARE NO SIDEWALKS FROM
8:26:47PM MacDILL ALL THE WAY TO HIMES.
8:26:53PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
8:26:55PM NOW TIME FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM NUMBER 9.
8:26:58PM IF ANYONE HERE WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD, PLEASE STATE YOUR
8:27:03PM NAME.
8:27:03PM >> I ACTUALLY LIVE ON THE STREET.
8:27:08PM YOU SAW THE TOP OF MY HOUSE.
8:27:10PM I CAME HERE TO LISTEN MORE THAN TALK AND THAT'S WHAT I
8:27:14PM INTENDED TO DO AND I THINK I HAD MOST OF MY QUESTIONS
8:27:18PM ANSWERED.
8:27:18PM A COUPLE OF THINGS.
8:27:19PM WE DO HAVE SOME SIDEWALKS THERE.
8:27:21PM THEY ARE KIND OF INTERSPERSED ON THE MacDILL SIDE.
8:27:25PM THEY EXTEND A BLOCK OR TWO.
8:27:26PM AND THEN ON THE HIMES SIDE, ANYTHING NEW THAT'S BEEN BUILT,
8:27:33PM McMANSIONS AND EVERYTHING HAVE SIDEWALKS, SO THERE ARE
8:27:35PM SOME.
8:27:36PM THAT'S NOT WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
8:27:39PM THE ONLY THING THAT REALLY WASN'T ANSWERED FOR ME POSES A
8:27:46PM CONCERN.
8:27:47PM FIELDER IS A VERY NARROW STREET, VERY SLEEPY LITTLE STREET.
8:27:53PM IT IS DIFFICULT TO GET THROUGH
8:28:01PM THE PROPOSAL AS I READ IT INTENDS TO ADD POPULATION DENSITY.
8:28:05PM WE ARE TAKING ONE HOUSE AND MAKING IT INTO TWO.
8:28:08PM WE ARE DOING THAT BY CHAINING THE ZONING.
8:28:10PM THAT SEEMS TO BE PRETTY EXTREME.
8:28:15PM IT MAY NOT AFFECT THINGS DRAMATICALLY IN THE SHORT TERM.
8:28:17PM BUT IT COULD BE A SLIPPERY SLOPE.
8:28:19PM WE ARE SETTING PRECEDENT.
8:28:22PM THE FIRST SIDE THAT WAS PUT UP SHOWS WHAT I AM TALKING
8:28:27PM ABOUT.
8:28:27PM EVERYTHING IN EVERY DIRECTION IS ALL THE SAME, ALL
8:28:30PM SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, ALL HOMES WITH YARDS AND TREES.
8:28:34PM IT'S A CONCERN.
8:28:35PM NOT REALLY AN OBJECTION.
8:28:36PM IT'S A CONCERN.
8:28:37PM THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO POINT OUT.
8:28:40PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:28:41PM ANYONE ELSE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM NUMBER 9?
8:28:44PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
8:28:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: MR. MICHELINI, DO YOU HAVE ANY REBUTTAL, SIR?
8:28:51PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: JUST LOADED WHEN YOU DO IN-FILL, YOU ADD
8:28:54PM A HOUSE, YOU ARE GOING TO INCREASE SOME TRAFFIC.
8:28:58PM WE WERE FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT BY THE TRANSPORTATION
8:29:01PM DEPARTMENT, AND WE HAVE PROVIDED THE SUFFICIENT PARKING
8:29:05PM ON-SITE SO THAT WE SHOULDN'T BE IMPACTING IT DRAMATICALLY.
8:29:09PM WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
8:29:12PM IN EVERY CASE THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AS WELL AS THE
8:29:15PM CITY STAFF HAVE FOUND THIS TO BE QUINT.
8:29:17PM THANK YOU.
8:29:18PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:29:22PM MOTION TO CLOSE?
8:29:22PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
8:29:24PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
8:29:27PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
8:29:30PM MOTION CARRIES.
8:29:33PM >> FILE REZ 19-37, MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
8:29:38PM FIRST READING, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
8:29:40PM VICINITY OF 3126 WEST FIELDER STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
8:29:44PM FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
8:29:47PM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
8:29:51PM SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
8:29:54PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:29:57PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND WITH THE REVISION SHEET.
8:30:00PM >>BILL CARLSON: WITH THE REVISION SHEET.
8:30:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
8:30:03PM ALL IN FAVOR?
8:30:04PM ANY OPPOSED?
8:30:05PM >> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8:30:08PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION TO BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
8:30:12PM 9:30 A.M.
8:30:13PM >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
8:30:14PM >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT ITEM NUMBER 10.
8:30:16PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:30:19PM COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 10 IS REZ 19-38, PROPERTY LOCATED AT
8:30:25PM 3011 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:30:26PM THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
8:30:30PM THE REQUEST IS FOR PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
8:30:34PM MULTIFAMILY AND BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
8:30:36PM THE APPLICANT IS BEING REPRESENTED BY MARK BENTLEY.
8:30:38PM >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
8:30:45PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
8:30:47PM WE ARE IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AGAIN FOR THE
8:30:52PM NEXT CASE.
8:30:53PM MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:30:57PM THIS IS AN IDENTIFIED MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
8:31:02PM IT IS ALSO AN IDENTIFIED EPIC CORRIDOR.
8:31:06PM THE ONLY TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR ON KENNEDY.
8:31:12PM THERE IS CURRENTLY NO TRANSIT ON THIS PORTION OF GANDY, BUT
8:31:15PM THERE IS TRANSIT TO THE WEST ON SOUTH DALE MABRY.
8:31:20PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL D EVACUATION
8:31:24PM ZONE.
8:31:29PM HERE IS THE PROPERTY SITE RIGHT HERE.
8:31:40PM THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF GANDY AND MacDILL.
8:31:43PM THERE IS A WALGREEN'S, FACILITY TO THE SOUTH, AND THEN YOU
8:31:49PM MOVE DOWN GANDY BOULEVARD, A BUNCH OF TOWN HOMES AND
8:31:56PM SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL.
8:32:00PM TO THE WEST, IF YOU HEAD TOWARD SOUTH DALE MABRY, THERE IS
8:32:04PM THE BAYSHORE POINT NURSING FACILITY, AND THERE'S OTHER
8:32:11PM COMMERCIAL USES ON THIS CORRIDOR.
8:32:13PM OFF THE GANDY CORRIDOR IS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY SINGLE-FAMILY
8:32:17PM DETACHED TO THE NORTH.
8:32:20PM TO THE SOUTH, THERE IS SOME SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED ALONG THE
8:32:25PM MacDILL CORRIDOR WITH SOME SCATTERED LIGHT COMMERCIAL,
8:32:28PM AND AGAIN IN THE INTERNAL NEIGHBORHOOD ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY
8:32:33PM DETACHED USE.
8:32:37PM ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
8:32:38PM THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTY EAST AND WEST ARE ALL
8:32:44PM COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
8:32:45PM THERE IS SOME SCATTERED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 REPRESENTED
8:32:51PM BY THE RED AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 THAT GOES DOWN
8:32:56PM MacDILL.
8:32:57PM TO THE NORTH, IT'S ALL EXCLUSIVELY RESIDENTIAL 10
8:33:00PM REPRESENTED BY THAT TAN COLOR.
8:33:02PM YOU GET INTO A MORE DENSE PATTERN OVER AT THE INTERSECTION
8:33:06PM OF BAYSHORE AND GANDY, WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL 20 AND
8:33:09PM RESIDENTIAL 50.
8:33:15PM ONTO THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST
8:33:18PM AND HAS FOUND THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
8:33:24PM POLICIES, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO WIDEN THE SIDEWALK
8:33:28PM ON GANDY BOULEVARD, WHICH IS AN IDENTIFIED TRANSIT EMPHASIS
8:33:32PM CORRIDOR.
8:33:32PM THOSE CORRIDORS ARE DESIGNATED TO PUT USES THAT SUPPORTIVE
8:33:38PM OF TRANSIT AND DEVELOPMENT IS ENCOURAGED TO BE IN A FORM
8:33:43PM THAT TRANSIT USAGE COULD BE UTILIZE DOLLARS IN THE FUTURE.
8:33:48PM THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT IS ALSO PROPOSING A SENSITIVE
8:33:51PM DESIGN TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH BY
8:33:54PM STEPPING BACK THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE TO 35 FEET ON THE
8:33:58PM NORTH AND INCREASING TO 45 FEET ALONG GANDY BOULEVARD,
8:34:03PM PROVIDING APPROPRIATE TRANSITION IN HEIGHT OF THE MAIN
8:34:07PM AUTOMOBILE ENTRANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS ALONG GANDY
8:34:11PM BOULEVARD.
8:34:12PM THE PD IS ALSO PROPOSING A SECONDARY PARKING GARAGE FROM THE
8:34:19PM ALLEY, FURTHERING LAND USE POLICY 15.3.27 WHICH ENCOURAGES
8:34:24PM PARKING ON A GARAGE TO CONSIDER ACCESS FROM AN ALLEY.
8:34:30PM LASTLY, THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS ENCOURAGING A VERTICAL
8:34:34PM MIXED USE STRUCTURE CONTAINING RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USE,
8:34:37PM WHICH IS ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROMOTES
8:34:41PM THE LONG-TERM VISION OF THE CITY'S TRANSIT EMPHASIS
8:34:44PM CORRIDOR.
8:34:45PM THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IS PREFERRED OVER SINGLE USE
8:34:49PM COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND THE APPLICANT IS FURTHERING THIS
8:34:52PM POLICY DIRECTION OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
8:34:55PM OVERALL, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT
8:34:58PM LONG-RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ENVISIONED UNDER THAT
8:35:01PM COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, AND BASED
8:35:05PM ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
8:35:08PM RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
8:35:11PM CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 PLAN
8:35:19PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
8:35:20PM THANK YOU.
8:35:20PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:35:27PM COUNCIL, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AGAIN AT 3011 WEST GANDY
8:35:31PM BOULEVARD.
8:35:32PM THE PROPERTY IS CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL, TO PD PLANNED
8:35:37PM DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USE AND BUSINESS
8:35:40PM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
8:35:41PM THE SITE IS LOCATED EAST OF SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE, WEST OF
8:35:46PM BAYSHORE BOULEVARD, AND SOUTH OF WEST HAWTHORNE ROAD, ON THE
8:35:50PM NORTH SIDE OF WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:35:52PM THE DEVELOPMENT IS 80 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 700
8:35:57PM SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
8:35:59PM THE STRUCTURE PROPERTY CAPES APPROXIMATELY 76,863 SQUARE
8:36:04PM FEET OR 1.76 ACRES AND PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A 4-STORY
8:36:09PM STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF 96,700 SQUARE FEET.
8:36:21PM TO NARROW IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT, THIS IS GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:36:26PM THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE NORTH
8:36:29PM ALLEY.
8:36:29PM THERE'S AN ALLEY THAT SURROUND THE SITE TO THE NORTH.
8:36:32PM AND THEN THERE'S RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EAST.
8:36:38PM THE STRUCTURE ITSELF IS OUTLINED, THE GRAY AREA.
8:36:42PM SO THIS SITE HAS POINT OF ACCESS.
8:36:45PM ONE TO THE SOUTH ON GANDY, THE POINTS OF ACCESS, JUST THE
8:36:51PM ONE TO THE SOUTH ON GANDY. THIS IS THE POINT OF ACCESS TO
8:36:53PM THE NORTH, TO THE ALLEY.
8:36:56PM THIS ONE IS FOR SOUTHWEST COLLECTION.
8:37:01PM THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 32 FEET, WHICH IS
8:37:04PM THE AREA THAT IS HERE IN YELLOW.
8:37:08PM SO THE PROPERTY LINE, THIS IS THE STRUCTURE, PROPOSED AT A
8:37:15PM 10-FOOT SETBACK TO THE NORTH AND THEN THE BUILDING HEIGHT
8:37:18PM MAXIMUM AND THE YELLOW IS 32 FEET, AND MAXIMUM BUILDING
8:37:22PM HEIGHT IS AT THAT POINT, 25 FEET.
8:37:26PM THE SETBACK TO THE WEST ARE 40 FEET MINIMUM, 30 FEET TO THE
8:37:31PM EAST, AND THE 8-FOOT MINIMUM TO THE SOUTH.
8:37:35PM SO THE SITE IS PROPOSING FENCE, PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH EDGE
8:37:42PM OF THE SITE.
8:37:44PM SO HERE IN BLUE THAT IS THE PROPOSED PRIVACY WALL ON THE
8:37:50PM SITE.
8:37:51PM LOCATED.
8:37:53PM ON THIS SIDE OF THE SITE IS THE COMMERCIAL USE THAT EXISTS
8:37:56PM WHICH, AND THEY ALREADY HAVE A WALL THAT IS ERECTED ALONG
8:38:01PM THE WEST.
8:38:04PM PARKING IS REQUIRED AT 148 SPACES.
8:38:07PM 138 SPACES ARE PROVIDED, TO INCLUDE SIX ADA SPACES, A WAIVER
8:38:11PM TO REQUEST FOR TEN SPACES WHICH IS A 7% REDUCTION FOR THE
8:38:19PM SITE.
8:38:20PM THE SITE IS PROPOSING, YOU HAVE STRUCTURED PARKING ON THE
8:38:23PM FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS.
8:38:24PM THEN YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL ON THE SECOND THROUGH THE FOURTH
8:38:28PM FLOORS.
8:38:29PM THIS IS WHERE THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IS PROPOSED TO BE
8:38:31PM LOCATED.
8:38:34PM THERE ARE CERTAIN AMENITIES PROVIDED WITHIN THE SITE.
8:38:38PM THIS IS THE POOL AREA ALONG THE SOUTH OF THE SITE AND ALL OF
8:38:42PM THIS IS OPEN SPACE AREA THAT IS PROPOSED.
8:38:49PM I HAVE A ZONING ATLAS.
8:38:54PM THIS IS THE SITE THAT'S LOCATED IN GREEN.
8:38:58PM THEY ARE STRIPED.
8:39:00PM THIS IS GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:39:02PM THIS IS MacDILL.
8:39:05PM JUST TO ORIENT YOU ON THE MAP.
8:39:07PM SO THE PROPERTY ALONG GANDY IS ZONED CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
8:39:13PM TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL 60.
8:39:15PM THE RS-60 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE SOUTH IS THE RS-75
8:39:19PM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
8:39:25PM THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE HERE IN
8:39:29PM RED.
8:39:30PM THAT'S GANDY BOULEVARD.
8:39:33PM THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
8:39:41PM THE SITE IS PRETTY WIDE.
8:39:45PM WE ARE TALKING WIDTH OF 475 FEET.
8:39:51PM THIS IS STARTING EAST ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS
8:39:54PM ON GANDY, LOOKING AT THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF
8:39:57PM GANDY, LOOKING FURTHER WEST.
8:40:01PM FURTHER WEST ON THE SITE.
8:40:06PM NOW THE WEST END.
8:40:08PM THIS IS CIRCLING AROUND THE SITE COMING FROM THE NORTHERN
8:40:13PM ALLEY.
8:40:14PM THIS IS A VIEW FROM MacDILL LOOKING EAST FROM AN ALLEY
8:40:18PM TO THE NORTH.
8:40:22PM THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE NORTH END OF THE SITE ON THAT
8:40:26PM ALLEY THAT'S LOOKING EAST.
8:40:30PM AND THIS IS A VIEW FROM ZION. THIS IS AN ALLEY EAST, AND BE
8:40:38PM INTERNAL ROADWAYS, NOT A ROADWAY BUT BECAUSE OF THE
8:40:41PM DEVELOPMENT THAT IS THERE WITH THE MOBILE HOME PARK, THEY
8:40:44PM KIND OF USE IT AS A DRIVE.
8:40:48PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH.
8:40:50PM THAT'S GANDY TO THE COMMERCIAL.
8:40:53PM THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE.
8:40:56PM THIS IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO THE EAST ON GANDY.
8:41:00PM THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING EAST ON GANDY.
8:41:04PM THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
8:41:06PM THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF ZION, SITE OF THE SITE.
8:41:14PM ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH OF THE SITE.
8:41:18PM THIS IS SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE AT THE CORNER OF
8:41:21PM MacDILL.
8:41:23PM THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
8:41:28PM CORNER OF MacDILL AND GANDY.
8:41:30PM THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
8:41:32PM THIS IS ON HAWTHORNE.
8:41:34PM THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING EAST.
8:41:37PM AND THERE ARE NO SINGLE-FAMILY NORTH OF THE SITE SO THERE
8:41:42PM ARE SEVERAL PICTURES OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL THAT EXIST
8:41:45PM ALONG THE NORTH.
8:41:56PM COUNCIL, THERE ARE SEVERAL WAIVERS REQUESTED WITH THIS
8:41:59PM APPLICATION.
8:42:01PM THERE ARE A TOTAL OF TEN WAIVERS LISTED.
8:42:03PM FOUR OF THEM RELATING TO LANDSCAPING.
8:42:06PM ONE OF THE WAIVERS THAT ARE LISTED IS REMOVED, SPACE LOCATED
8:42:14PM NORTH OF THE SITE, AND I CAN SHOW YOU THAT, BY
8:42:23PM TRANSPORTATION STAFF, AND IT'S ON THE SITE PLAN.
8:42:27PM SO WITH THAT MODIFICATION, AND YOU END UP WITH A TOTAL OF
8:42:31PM NINE WAIVERS.
8:42:31PM THE STAFF REPORT INCLUDES FINDINGS FROM STAFF.
8:42:36PM IT WAS REVIEWED BY THE DRC STAFF.
8:42:42PM STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT AND YOU WILL SEE THE
8:42:45PM FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND
8:42:48PM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
8:42:50PM SHOULD CITY COUNCIL DECIDE TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST, SITE
8:42:53PM PLAN MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
8:42:56PM READING.
8:42:57PM AND I HAVE A SITE PLAN REVISION SHEET.
8:43:01PM THERE ARE SOME REVISIONS THAT CONTAIN THAT RE-- THE
8:43:07PM REVISIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
8:43:10PM READING.
8:43:11PM SINCE THE SITE IS HEAVILY WOODED AND WE HAVE A CONSIDERABLE
8:43:14PM AMOUNT OF COMMENTS FROM NATURAL RESOURCES, BRYAN IS HERE
8:43:19PM WITH NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT.
8:43:20PM I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE HIM COME AND SPEAK TO THE COMMENTS THAT
8:43:22PM HE HAS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, AND ALSO HE CAN
8:43:25PM PROVIDE YOU WITH HIS ANALYSIS OF THE SITE.
8:43:47PM BRYAN KNOX, CITY OF TAMPA RESOURCES.
8:43:51PM THE FIRST REQUESTED IT 94% OF THE TREES TO BE REMOVED ON THE
8:43:55PM SITE.
8:43:56PM NATURAL RESOURCES OBJECTED TO THE AMOUNT OF TREES REQUESTED
8:43:59PM FOR REMOVAL, AND THE SITE PLAN WAS REVISED TO REQUEST 91%
8:44:06PM TREE REMOVAL.
8:44:08PM PART OF THAT WAS BY SHIFTING THE STRUCTURE FURTHER TO THE
8:44:13PM EAST.
8:44:19PM TO SAVE THIS TREE, A 55-INCH LIVE OAK.
8:44:28PM OVERALL THE SITE PLAN IS PROPOSING TO PRESERVE FOUR PALMS,
8:44:33PM THE 65-INCH GRAND OAK THAT I JUST PRESENTED, AND ONE 20-INCH
8:44:39PM OAK LOCATED HERE.
8:44:43PM OVERALL, PROTECTED TREES ARE PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL INCLUDING
8:44:48PM FOUR NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
8:44:52PM ALL TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL OF SUBJECT TO MITIGATION AS
8:44:55PM REFLECTED ON THE PROPOSED PLAN.
8:44:57PM JUST TO GIVE YOU, THERE ARE EIGHT GRAND TREES ON THIS SITE.
8:45:05PM THE ONE HIGHLIGHTED IN RED, THOSE ARE HAZARDOUS TREES.
8:45:12PM THE ONES HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN, THOSE ARE NONHAZARDOUS THAT
8:45:16PM ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
8:45:18PM THE TREES SHOWN HERE IN YELLOW IS THE GRAND TREE PROPOSED TO
8:45:26PM BE PRESERVED.
8:45:27PM IN AN ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE THE GRAND TREE, LABELED AS GRAND
8:45:31PM TREE NUMBER 2, THE SHIFTING THE BUILDING TO THE EAST
8:45:35PM PROVIDING APPROXIMATELY 27 FEET FOR THE GRAND TREE'S
8:45:39PM PROTECTED RADIUS.
8:45:41PM THERE WAS A SECOND ON-SITE MEETING TO ADDRESS THE PERMITTING
8:45:44PM REQUIRED FROM THE SHIFT OF THE BUILDING.
8:45:47PM AFTER THAT NATURAL RESOURCES REQUESTED ADDITIONAL
8:45:50PM INFORMATION TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT TO THE CANOPY.
8:45:55PM WE HAVE RECEIVED THE REQUESTED INFORMATION, BUT THE
8:45:57PM INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN REFLECTED ON THE SITE PLAN TONIGHT,
8:46:01PM NOR HAVE WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE INFORMATION IN
8:46:04PM TIME FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
8:46:08PM JUST TO RECAP THE WAIVERS.
8:46:12PM NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND IT INCONSISTENT BECAUSE THERE'S FOUR
8:46:17PM NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
8:46:19PM THERE'S A WAIVER THAT REQUESTS TO ALLOW PAYMENT INTO THE
8:46:22PM TREE TRUST FUND DUE TO THE LACK OF GREEN SPACE TO PLANT THE
8:46:27PM TREE TABLE TREES.
8:46:30PM ALSO, THERE'S A WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE REDUCTION IN
8:46:33PM MULTIFAMILY GREEN SPACE PER UNIT THAT'S SUBJECT TO
8:46:35PM LANDSCAPE.
8:46:37PM ALSO A REDUCTION IN VEHICULAR USE AREA OF GREEN SPACE WHICH
8:46:40PM IS ALSO SUBJECT TO LANDSCAPE IN LIEU FEES.
8:46:44PM AND ALSO THERE'S A REDUCTION IN THE RETENTION OF THE SITE.
8:46:47PM THE SITE IS OVER AN ACRE.
8:46:49PM 50% MINIMUM OF THE TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESERVED.
8:46:55PM RETENTION FROM 50 50% TO 91%.
8:47:00PM NATURAL RESOURCES STAFF IS AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS.
8:47:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:47:08PM YOU SAY HAZARDOUS?
8:47:12PM >> WE HAVE A GRAND TREE EVALUATION FORM.
8:47:16PM BY DEFINITION, IN OUR RECENT CODE, C 9 WOULD BE CONSIDERED A
8:47:22PM HAZARDOUS TREE.
8:47:23PM SO ANYTHING THAT'S RATED C-9 OR GREATER WOULD BE CONSIDERED
8:47:27PM HAZARDOUS.
8:47:29PM AND JUST BE DO A QUICK COURSE IN OUR RATING SYSTEM, A IS
8:47:33PM CONSIDERED NO POTENTIAL HAZARD.
8:47:37PM B, MINOR HAZARD.
8:47:39PM C ARE SOME MAJOR DEFECTS BUT YOU CAN STILL SAVE IT.
8:47:42PM D IS CONSIDERED EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS.
8:47:46PM AND F IS CONSIDERED DEAD.
8:47:48PM AND SO WITHIN THAT, THERE ARE THREE REQUIRED CRITERIA ALSO,
8:47:53PM AND THOSE ARE THE POINT SYSTEMS.
8:47:55PM AND THOSE ARE TARGET, POTENTIAL FOR FAILURE AND LOCATION.
8:48:03PM SO WITH THIS ONE, THOSE THREE GRAND TREES, THE TREES THAT
8:48:09PM ARE HIGHLIGHTED IN RED, THOSE ARE CONSIDERED TO BE HAZARDOUS
8:48:12PM BY NATURAL RESOURCES, AND
8:48:21PM >> [OFF MICROPHONE] OF THE GRAND TREES THAT WE ARE TALKING
8:48:32PM ABOUT?
8:48:34PM >> I DO.
8:48:45PM FROM THE PHOTOS FROM THE CITY, THIS IS THE NONHAZARDOUS
8:48:53PM GRAND TREE LOCATED IN THE NORTH WEST CORNER, 222.
8:48:56PM THAT ONE IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE -- SOME OF THE CANOPY ACTUALLY
8:49:01PM GOES INTO IT.
8:49:06PM THAT'S THE ONE THAT'S PROPOSED FOR PRESERVATION.
8:49:10PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THE OTHERS?
8:49:11PM THE ONES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN OUT?
8:49:13PM >> ALL RIGHT, THIS IS GRAND TREE NUMBER 17 IS LOCATED RIGHT
8:49:23PM HERE.
8:49:29PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS THAT LIVE OAK OR LAUREL OAK?
8:49:35PM >> IT'S LIVE OAK.
8:49:38PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT'S THAT RATED?
8:49:40PM >> THIS ONE IS RATED ...
8:49:55PM I BELIEVE THIS ONE IS RATED B-H-5.
8:50:02PM OUR ARBORIST IS -- BA, YES, SIR.
8:50:08PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND SOME OF THE OTHERS.
8:50:09PM I KNOW YOU HAVE A CLUSTER THERE SORT OF TOWARD THE MIDDLE.
8:50:12PM >> YES.
8:50:14PM SO THIS IS ALSO RATED THE SAME.
8:50:16PM THESE TWO ARE VERY SIMILAR.
8:50:19PM THIS ONE HAS SOME DEFECT.
8:50:23PM IT WAS A LARGE CANOPY.
8:50:25PM THERE'S A LARGE CAVITY IN THE BACK.
8:50:27PM THERE WAS A LEAN ON THIS TREE AS WELL SO RATED A LITTLE
8:50:33PM HIGHER B.
8:50:36PM AND THESE WERE DEEMED HAZARDOUS JUST DUE TO CAVITIES.
8:50:40PM WE DIDN'T FORMALLY RATE THOSE, THE ONES IN RED, BUT THEY
8:50:45PM WERE DEEMED HAZARD OUTS JUST BASED ON THEIR CONDITION,
8:50:49PM CAVITIES AND OTHER ISSUES INVOLVING LIMBS, AND POOR
8:50:54PM COMPARTMENTALIZATION AND STRUCTURE.
8:50:57PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND DO WE HAVE THIS DRAWING?
8:51:03PM I DON'T SEE THIS IN OUR MATERIALS.
8:51:06PM THIS DOCUMENT.
8:51:07PM >> THIS WAS MARKED UP BUT I CAN ADD THAT TO THE RECORD.
8:51:17PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, THANK YOU.
8:51:19PM AND I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
8:51:24PM >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
8:51:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: YOU HAVE A QUESTION AND I HAVE A QUESTION.
8:51:33PM GO AHEAD, SIR.
8:51:39PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MS. DOCK, ON THE FRONT THERE, THE
8:51:48PM DUMPSTER ACCESS IS ON THE REAR, ON THE ALLEY, CLOSEST TO THE
8:51:54PM HAWTHORNE RESIDENCE, AND THAT'S COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER?
8:51:59PM I WOULD ASSUME?
8:52:02PM I MEAN IT'S NOT INDIVIDUAL BLUE CANS, RIGHT?
8:52:09PM >>LACHONE DOCK: LOOKING AT THE --
8:52:17PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT IT'S A DUMPSTER?
8:52:20PM >>LACHONE DOCK: YES.
8:52:21PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE THERE ANY REGULATIONS FOR THE CITY TO
8:52:26PM COME PICK UP THE DUMPSTER?
8:52:27PM >>LACHONE DOCK: I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S SPECIFIC HOURS.
8:52:35PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M SORRY?
8:52:37PM >> THERE ARE DUMPSTERS CURRENTLY ON THE ALLEY.
8:52:40PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
8:52:42PM WELL, MR. BENTLEY CAN PRESENT THAT LATER.
8:52:45PM BUT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A NEW PROJECT.
8:52:47PM >>LACHONE DOCK: ASKING THE TIME IT WILL BE PICKED UP FROM
8:52:54PM THE PROJECT?
8:52:55PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A NO, I'M SAYING THE SITE PLAN DOESN'T
8:52:58PM SHOW ANY LIMITATIONS, CORRECT?
8:53:00PM >>LACHONE DOCK: CORRECT.
8:53:06PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S SOME BALCONIES THAT
8:53:09PM MAY BE 3rd FLOOR OR 4th FLOOR BALCONIES THAT LOOK TO
8:53:14PM THE NORTH?
8:53:17PM DO YOU HAVE THE ELEVATION THERE?
8:53:19PM >>LACHONE DOCK: WHICH?
8:53:28PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M JUST TRYING TO CONFIRM WHAT I SAW.
8:53:31PM AS RELATED TO THE ELEVATION.
8:53:32PM >>LACHONE DOCK: I BELIEVE THERE ARE OUTDOOR AREAS ON THE
8:53:36PM NORTH.
8:53:39PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OH, ONE OTHER QUESTION ON ZONING.
8:53:44PM DO WE KNOW THE HISTORY OF THIS?
8:53:46PM WHY OR HOW DID IT BECOME CG?
8:53:49PM BECAUSE THIS HAS BEEN MULTIFAMILY EVER SINCE I HAVE BEEN
8:53:53PM PROBABLY BEEN BORN IN TERMS OF BEING MULTIFAMILY.
8:53:59PM HOW DID IT BECOME CG?
8:54:01PM DO WE KNOW?
8:54:03PM >>LACHONE DOCK: CG WAS DECREED WITH C 1 UNDER CHAPTER 43.
8:54:07PM SO ALONG THAT STRIP OF GANDY, IT HAD THAT COMMERCIAL.
8:54:11PM EVEN THOUGH IT HAD HISTORICALLY BEEN A RESIDENTIAL.
8:54:15PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SOME SORT OF ZONING CONFORMANCE OR
8:54:17PM SOMETHING?
8:54:18PM >>LACHONE DOCK: IT MUST HAVE HAPPENED DURING THAT TIME AND
8:54:20PM JUST HAD THAT STRIP OF GANDY HEADING WEST AS COMMERCIAL
8:54:24PM MUCH.
8:54:25PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEN GOING BACK TO THE TREE ISSUE, I
8:54:29PM KNOW, THE PRIOR COUNCIL, THREE MEMBERS THAT ARE HERE TODAY,
8:54:39PM DID SIGNIFICANT OVERHAUL OF THE TREE CODE.
8:54:51PM HOW DOES THAT OVERHAUL IMPACT TODAY'S EVALUATION OF THE
8:54:55PM TREES?
8:54:57PM >> FOR TODAY'S EVALUATION IT DOESN'T.
8:54:59PM IT WILL IMPACT IT ON PERMITTING.
8:55:03PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, CAN YOU FURTHER THAT A LITTLE BIT?
8:55:05PM >> AS OF NOW, THE TREE TABLE AS IT STANDS ON THE SITE PLAN
8:55:10PM WILL BE EVALUATED.
8:55:12PM THE SITE PLAN WILL BE EVALUATED FOR THE TREE TABLE THAT'S ON
8:55:15PM THE REZONING.
8:55:18PM IF THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT WILL BE PRODUCED TO
8:55:23PM THE ADDITION OF THE NEW CODE, BE EVALUATED AT THE TIME OF
8:55:28PM PERMITTING BUT FOR THE MOST PART THE TREE TABLE IS PROBABLY
8:55:30PM THE MOST FOCUS ISSUE FOR US AND THAT WILL APPLY BASED ON THE
8:55:36PM REZONING.
8:55:38PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN REGARD TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS A
8:55:39PM COMMERCIAL ZONED PROPERTY, IS THERE SOME SORT OF BLANKET
8:55:42PM WAIVER THAT SAYS WE CAN ELIMINATE GRAND TREES ON COMMERCIAL
8:55:48PM PROPERTY, COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTY, ANYTHING LIKE THAT?
8:55:52PM >> NO, SIR.
8:55:53PM >>LACHONE DOCK: COUNCIL, AT THE TIME, THIS WAS APPLIED
8:55:59PM UNDER THE OLD CODE.
8:56:00PM THE NEW CODE HADN'T BEEN ADOPTED.
8:56:02PM SO THERE ARE SOME ASPECTS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF
8:56:06PM PERMITTING.
8:56:06PM ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS REVIEWED WITH THE APPLICANT WAS
8:56:09PM THE OPTION OF AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING WAS IF YOU WANTED TO
8:56:13PM PLANT TREES ON ANOTHER PROPERTY WITHIN THE PLANNING
8:56:16PM DISTRICT.
8:56:18PM ASPECT OF THE NEW CODE IF IT HAS BEEN OFFICIAL, THEY CAN
8:56:21PM APPLY AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
8:56:23PM SO WHEN THIS WAS SUBMITTED THEN, THE CODE WAS NOT ADOPTED SO
8:56:27PM EVERYTHING WAS REVIEWED UNDER THE CURRENT CODE -- THE OLD
8:56:30PM CODE.
8:56:31PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
8:56:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
8:56:33PM ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
8:56:35PM I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.
8:56:37PM THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS SUBMITTED THAT STAFF DIDN'T GET
8:56:40PM A CHANCE TO REVIEW, OR DID I HEAR SOMETHING --
8:56:45PM >> YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
8:56:47PM THERE WAS AN ANALYSIS THAT WE ASKED FOR IN THE SECOND
8:56:51PM SUBMITTAL AND WE JUST DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO REVIEW IT.
8:56:55PM AND SO WE HAD IT IN OUR POSSESSION BUT DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO
8:57:00PM REVIEW IT.
8:57:01PM >>LUIS VIERA: I GUESS IF WE APPROVE THIS BETWEEN NOW AND
8:57:03PM SECOND READING, IF WE APPROVE IT, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT CAN
8:57:06PM BE DONE?
8:57:07PM >> WE CAN TRY.
8:57:08PM AND THERE'S A LOT OF FACTORS INVOLVED.
8:57:12PM I CAN'T ANSWER THAT FOR CERTAIN.
8:57:14PM >>LUIS VIERA: I GET IT.
8:57:15PM >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
8:57:17PM IF THAT ANALYSIS CAME UP WITH A NEW CONCLUSION WHERE CHANGES
8:57:22PM COULD BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING BE THOSE
8:57:26PM DIRECTED TONIGHT, IF NEW INFORMATION CAME UP THAT WOULD BE
8:57:29PM PRESENTED TO YOU AT SECOND READINGS, YOU HAVE TO GO BACK TO
8:57:31PM FIRST READING.
8:57:34PM I'M NOT SAYING IT WAS, BUT IF IT WAS.
8:57:37PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
8:57:39PM ANYONE ELSE?
8:57:39PM OKAY.
8:57:40PM APPLICANT.
8:57:40PM OH, YES, SIR, MR. CARLSON.
8:57:45PM >>BILL CARLSON: JUST A QUICK QUESTION FOR NATURAL RESOURCES.
8:57:47PM IN THE ANALYSIS THAT YOU ALL DO, A NEWBY QUESTION, DO YOU
8:57:52PM LOOK AT HOW IT IMPACTS THE SURROUNDING AREA OR THE
8:57:57PM SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS?
8:57:58PM IS THERE ANY IMPACT ON THE HOUSES NORTH OF THE PROPERTY?
8:58:03PM >> WE DO ANALYSIS IN TERMS OF IMPACT TO THE NEIGHBORING
8:58:07PM PROPERTIES AND THE SCENARIOS FOR OFF-SITE TREES.
8:58:12PM BY OFF-SITE I MEAN TREES THAT ARE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
8:58:22PM >>BILL CARLSON: DOES THE CURRENT CANOPY OF THESE TREES GO
8:58:24PM INTO THE RITE RIGHT-OF-WAY, HOUSES TO THE NORTH?
8:58:40PM >> THERE'S A 27-INCH AND 29-INCH TREE HERE.
8:58:43PM THAT CERTAINLY IS A BUFFER TO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OVER
8:58:45PM ON HAWTHORNE.
8:58:47PM AND THERE'S A 30-INCH OAK HERE WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THE
8:58:50PM CANOPY EXTENDS INTO BE THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
8:58:55PM THAT WOULD BE THE THREE TREES THAT WOULD BE A CONCERN FOR
8:59:01PM CANOPY FOR THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
8:59:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
8:59:06PM MR. SHELBY.
8:59:07PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
8:59:09PM I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO AT THIS POINT TO
8:59:12PM ASK THAT ALL WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS RELATIVE TO TONIGHT'S
8:59:14PM HEARING WHICH HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN
8:59:17PM CITY COUNCIL'S OFFICE BE RECEIVED AND FILED INTO THE AT THIS
8:59:20PM TIME.
8:59:20PM >> SO MOVED.
8:59:22PM >> SECOND.
8:59:22PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:59:24PM A SECOND I BELIEVE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
8:59:27PM ALL IN FAVOR?
8:59:28PM ANY OPPOSED?
8:59:28PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
8:59:34PM >>LUIS VIERA: MR. BENTLEY.
8:59:34PM >>MARK BENTLEY: 401 EAST JACKSON STREET, TAMPA 33602 AND I
8:59:41PM AM VERY PLEASED TO BE HERE ON BEHALF OF BLUE LINE
8:59:43PM RESIDENTIAL TO PRESENT THIS MIXED USE PROJECT.
8:59:48PM BEFORE I GET STARTED, THERE ARE SOME VERY COMPLEX TECHNICAL
8:59:53PM ISSUES.
8:59:53PM I THINK YOU CAN IMAGINE DEALING WITH NOT ONLY THE TREES, THE
8:59:57PM DESIGN, ALSO THERE'S AN OBLIGATION IMPOSED ON US TO REBUILD
9:00:01PM AN ALLEY ON ZION STREET.
9:00:04PM SO I REQUEST FIVE ADDITIONAL MINUTES.
9:00:10PM >>LUIS VIERA: PERSONALLY I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THAT GIVEN
9:00:12PM THIS ISSUE, BUT --
9:00:14PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NEITHER DO I BUT I THINK WE GIVE THAT AT
9:00:16PM THE END NOT THE BEGINNING.
9:00:17PM >>MARK BENTLEY: WE'LL DO WHAT WE CAN.
9:00:20PM JUST A COUPLE POINTS BEFORE I GET STARTED.
9:00:22PM MR. KNOX ALLUDED TO THE TWO TREES HERE WHICH BLOCKED THE
9:00:26PM VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR TWO NEIGHBORS.
9:00:30PM WE HAVE NEGOTIATED WITH TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO
9:00:32PM REDESIGN THE ALLEY TO PRESERVE THOSE.
9:00:35PM THOSE ARE STAYING.
9:00:36PM AND WE'LL SHOW YOU PICTURES, MR. CARLSON.
9:00:39PM ALSO THERE'S BUFFER TREES HERE LEAK WISE ARE BEING
9:00:43PM PRESERVED, I PROVIDE THE BUFFER TO THE CONDO PROJECT TO THE
9:00:47PM EAST ALONG WITH THIS ONE PROPERTY OWNER UP HERE.
9:00:51PM I THINK IT'S -- I COULD BE WRONG ON THE NAME.
9:00:55PM ALSO WITH RESPECT TO THE -- WE ARE SUBJECT TO THE NEW TREE
9:00:59PM ORDINANCE THAT COUNCIL PASSED A FEW WEEKS AGO, AND WITH
9:01:02PM RESPECT TO GRAND TREES, THE STANDARD FOR NONRESIDENTIAL SAYS
9:01:08PM GRAND TREE MAY BE RENDERED HAZARDOUS DUE TO IMPACT OF
9:01:12PM CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND INCLUDING PROPOSED
9:01:15PM BUILDING FOOTPRINT OF A BUILDING, WHICH ADHERES TO THE
9:01:18PM STANDARD, SETBACKS, WHICH IMPACT THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF
9:01:23PM THE TREE, AND THE APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATE NODE OTHER
9:01:25PM REASONABLE RECONFIGURES RATION OF THE APPLICABLE PROPOSED
9:01:28PM DEVELOPMENT.
9:01:29PM AND THEY TALK ABOUT REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION, AND SAYS
9:01:36PM THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE REDUCING STORIES. SO YOU WILL SEE ONCE
9:01:39PM WE GET THROUGH THIS ARBORIST AND THE LAND USE PLANNER,
9:01:42PM UNFORTUNATELY THESE TWO GRAND TREES THAT ARE RIGHT IN THE
9:01:46PM HEART OF THE PROPERTY, SO WHETHER WE DEVELOP THE PROPERTY
9:01:49PM FOR THIS PROJECT OR IT'S DEVELOPED OR NOT DEVELOPED, YOU ARE
9:01:54PM GOING TO HEAR TESTIMONY FROM OUR EXPERTS, JUST THE SHEAR
9:01:57PM REMOVAL OF MOBILE HOMES, REMOVAL OF THE PADS, THE ROADS,
9:02:00PM UTILITIES, AND THINGS LIKE THAT, I THINK YOU SAW SOME OF
9:02:03PM THESE PHOTOS. THEY HAVE BEEN SEVERELY IMPACTED OVER THE
9:02:12PM LAST 50 YEARS, AND, MR. DINGFELDER, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING
9:02:14PM THIS PARK PREDATED THE ZONING DECODE FOR THIS AREA SO IT WAS
9:02:17PM KIND OF A GRANDFATHERED IN SITUATION IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF
9:02:20PM THE HISTORY.
9:02:26PM SO A COUPLE OTHER THINGS.
9:02:28PM MR. KNOX INDICATED ON PAGE 4, YOU ALL JUST HAD SOME
9:02:33PM DISCUSSION ON THAT.
9:02:33PM STAFF HAD REQUESTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE
9:02:36PM CANOPY IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR TREE NUMBER 2, THAT'S THE 65-INCH
9:02:41PM GRAND.
9:02:42PM WE ARE SAVING AND SAVED BY MOVING THE BUILDING 29 FEET TO
9:02:46PM THE EAST.
9:02:49PM ON MAY 29th, OUR ARBORIST AND MR. KNOX AND SOME OTHER
9:02:53PM CITY REPRESENTATIVES MET OUT IN THE FIELD TO TALK ABOUT THE
9:02:57PM TRIMMING OF THAT PARTICULAR TREE.
9:03:00PM AND THEN THEY REQUESTED THIS ANALYSIS THAT WAS MAY 29th.
9:03:06PM ON MAY 30th WE SUPPLIED TO THE MR. KNOX AND HIS TEAM.
9:03:11PM SO THEY HAVE HAD IT FOR I GUESS A COUPLE WEEKS, ANYHOW.
9:03:18PM AND IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR STAFF REPORT, IT SAYS THAT THE
9:03:21PM CONDITION ON THE ANALYSIS WAS SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO THE STAFF
9:03:26PM BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
9:03:29PM AND WE HAVE DONE IT ALREADY TWO WEEKS IN ADVANCE.
9:03:31PM SO THE IMPLICATION, IN REALS TO THE QUESTION YOU ASKED, CAN
9:03:36PM YOU DO IT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND, STAFF REPORT SAYS THAT
9:03:38PM WAS THEIR INTENT TO DO THAT.
9:03:40PM AND THEY HAVE HAD IT FOR A WHILE.
9:03:41PM AND I KNOW THIS ISN'T THE ONLY PROJECT THEY HAVE, AND I
9:03:45PM UNDERSTAND THIS.
9:03:46PM OKAY.
9:03:49PM AND WE HAVE PROPOSED A ZONING CONDITION THAT I GAVE TO MS.
9:03:54PM DOCK FOR ADDITIONAL SCREENING THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT LATER
9:03:56PM ON.
9:03:57PM AND THE OTHER REALLY RELATES TO SOME OF THE BUFFERING.
9:04:04PM CERTAIN SIZE PLANTS YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE AND WE ARE
9:04:07PM GOING TO DOUBLE UP ON THAT AND INCREASE THE HEIGHT, AND MR.
9:04:10PM SAND WILL TALK ABOUT THAT.
9:04:12PM WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS INTRODUCE ONE OF THE PRINCIPALS
9:04:16PM OF BLUE LINE RESIDENTIAL, MR. RUSIAN FEDOTENKO.
9:04:21PM HE JUST BUILT A NEW HOME NOT TOO FAR FROM HERE IN BALLAST
9:04:25PM POINT AND HE INTENDS TO MAINTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROJECT.
9:04:30PM HE'S NOT GOING TO FLIP IT.
9:04:32PM THAT'S NOT HIS INTENTION.
9:04:33PM YOU MAY REMEMBER RUSIAN AS A MEMBER OF THE TAMPA BAY
9:04:39PM LIGHTNING, IN FACT IN 2004 THE 7th GAME, THEY WON THE
9:04:43PM GAME 2-1, IT DOESN'T GET ANY COOLER THAN THAT.
9:04:49PM HE DIDN'T ASK ME TO SAY THAT, BELIEVE ME.
9:04:51PM I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS AN INTERESTING STORY.
9:04:54PM BUT RUSIAN WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE HIMSELF TO COUNCIL AND
9:04:58PM TALK ABOUT THE PROJECT AND HIS INTENTION.
9:04:59PM OKAY?
9:05:00PM >> THANK YOU, MARK.
9:05:06PM GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
9:05:09PM COUNCIL.
9:05:09PM MY NAME IS RUSIAN FEDOTENKO AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
9:05:18PM I WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
9:05:20PM AFTER TWO YEARS AGO FROM THE NHL I KNEW WOULD WANT TO TAMPA
9:05:26PM AND MAKE IT MY PERMANENT HOME.
9:05:28PM IN FACT, I WAS JUST A FEW BLOCKS FROM THIS PROJECT.
9:05:38PM SORRY, A LITTLE NERVOUS.
9:05:40PM THIS IS MY -- ENGLISH ISN'T MY FIRST LANGUAGE.
9:05:43PM AS SOMEONE WHO IS ENJOYING LIVING IN THIS CITY, I AM FULLY
9:05:47PM INVESTED IN MAKING OUR COMMUNITY INVESTMENT.
9:05:50PM FOR YEARS I HAVE PASSED THROUGH THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE
9:05:54PM AND DREAM OF WHAT WE CAN ADD POTENTIALLY OF BUILDING A
9:05:58PM PROJECT.
9:05:58PM TONIGHT, I AM EXCITED TO PRESENT TO YOU THE PRODUCT OF THOSE
9:06:02PM DREAMS, THE RESULT OF MONTHS OF HARD WORK, WITHOUT TEAM AND
9:06:11PM ALSO THE CITY STAFF.
9:06:13PM THE DESIGN ALSO REFLECTS THE MANY CHANGES WE HAVE MADE AFTER
9:06:18PM CONSULTING WITH ADJACENT NEIGHBORS AND NUMEROUS OCCASIONS,
9:06:22PM WE BELIEVE WE HAVE COME UP WITH A DESIGN THAT YOU WILL BE
9:06:26PM ALL PROUD.
9:06:28PM I HAVE A PARTNER ON THIS PROJECT, A LOCAL CUSTOM BUILDER,
9:06:33PM WHO BRINGS THIS EXCEPTIONAL MIXED USE PRODUCT TO THE GANDY
9:06:38PM CORRIDOR.
9:06:39PM WE HAVE DESIGNED A BOUTIQUE APARTMENT BUILDING WHICH WILL
9:06:45PM PROVIDE A HIGH LEVEL OF DESIGN AND AMENITY.
9:06:50PM OUR TARGET AUDIENCE WILL BE YOUNG TO MIDDLE AGED
9:06:52PM PROFESSIONALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN SOUTH TAMPA.
9:06:59PM OF GREAT IMPORTANCE TO MAKE YOUR DECISION TONIGHT THAT THIS
9:07:05PM PROJECT, OUR COMPANY WILL BE KEEPING IT.
9:07:07PM WE ARE NOT TRYING TO SELL AND FLIP IT.
9:07:11PM SO WITH THAT, IT WILL BE A REFLECTION OF THE COMMUNITY AND
9:07:20PM FOR THOSE REASONS WE'LL TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN MAKING THE
9:07:24PM PROJECT THE BEST IT CAN BE FOR OURSELVES, FOR FUTURE
9:07:28PM TENANTS, FOR NEIGHBORS, FOR OUR CITY, OF THAT I CAN ASSURE
9:07:33PM YOU.
9:07:34PM WITH THIS, I HOPE YOU WILL SHARE THE SAME VISION WITH US AND
9:07:39PM YOU CAN MOVE FORWARD TO MAKE THIS PROJECT A REALITY.
9:07:42PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
9:07:46PM SORRY, I'M A LITTLE NERVOUS AND TALK FAST.
9:07:49PM >>MARK BENTLEY: JUST TO BACK UP A SECOND.
9:07:59PM THE TREE SURVEY, IT'S ALREADY A ZONING CONDITION.
9:08:03PM IT'S IN THE STAFF REPORT ABOUT THE REDESIGN OF ZION STREET
9:08:08PM AND THE ALLIES TO PRESERVE IT SO THAT'S A COMMITMENT AND HAS
9:08:13PM BEEN VETTED OUT BY TRANSPORTATION.
9:08:17PM THERE ARE OFF-SITE TREES WE ARE SAVING SO WE DON'T GET ANY
9:08:20PM CREDIT NATURALLY FOR DOING.
9:08:21PM THAT JUST A COUPLE OF POINTS AND THEN I WILL TURN IT OVER TO
9:08:23PM BE MR. CARNEGIE.
9:08:28PM THE PROPERTY, THIS IS ZONED CG WHICH ALLOWS STORES, FAST
9:08:32PM FOOD, RESTAURANTS, INTENSIVE USES, AT A HEIGHT OF 45 FEET,
9:08:37PM AND ACTUALLY CAN GET UP TO 65 FEET ADMINISTRATIVELY, AND AN
9:08:41PM F.A.R. OF 1.0.
9:08:43PM THAT WOULD ALLOW AN 80,000 SQUARE-FOOT STRIP CENTER, FOR
9:08:47PM EXAMPLE, ASSUMING YOU MET ALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD.
9:08:51PM USING HALF OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DURING THE PM PEAK HOUR 4
9:08:56PM TO 6 P.M. IT WOULD GENERATE 260 VEHICLES.
9:08:59PM IF THERE WERE TWO FAST FOOD PLACES THERE IT WOULD BE 235
9:09:03PM VEHICLES.
9:09:04PM VERSUS OUR 36 VEHICLES DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME.
9:09:08PM SO YOU ARE LOOKING AT 268, 235, VERSUS 36.
9:09:14PM WE ALSO TOOK A LOOK AT -- AND YOU WILL HEAR FROM OUR
9:09:16PM TRANSPORTATION PLANNER MIKE YATES, WHAT IF YOU DID 50 UNITS
9:09:20PM INSTEAD OF 80 UNITS?
9:09:22PM WOULD THAT HAVE ANY IMPACT IN TERMS OF TRANSPORTATION
9:09:24PM IMPACT?
9:09:25PM AND THE ANSWER IS NO, THE ONLY DIFFERENCE WOULD BE 23 TRIPS
9:09:28PM BETWEEN THAT 4 TO 6 P.M. PERIOD.
9:09:30PM SO THIS IS A VERY LOW GENERATOR, AND PROBABLY THE WORST CASE
9:09:37PM SCENARIO, ONE OF THE WORST SKIES SCENARIOS FOR THE NEIGHBORS
9:09:40PM TO THE NORTH IS TO HAVE IT DEVELOPED AS COMMERCIAL, AND
9:09:44PM THERE WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL TRAFFIC NOISE, SMELL AND OTHER
9:09:47PM ADVERSE IMPACTS.
9:09:49PM THE NEXT WITNESS WE HAVE IS ADAM CARNEGIE, PRINCIPAL AT
9:09:54PM STANTEC IN TAMPA, HAS A MASTERS IN URBAN REGIONAL PLANNING
9:09:58PM FROM RUTGERS UNIVERSITY AND PROFESSIONAL PLANNER EICP FOR
9:10:03PM ABOUT 35 YEARS.
9:10:04PM ADAM.
9:10:04PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCIL.
9:10:13PM ADAM CARNEGIE WITH STANTEC, 777 SOUTH HARBOR ISLAND IN
9:10:20PM TAMPA.
9:10:20PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
9:10:21PM I'M THE APPLICANT AS EXPLAINED.
9:10:25PM IF WE COULD HAVE THE POWERPOINT, PLEASE.
9:10:27PM I JUST WANT TO DISCUSS FOR YOU DURING MY PRESENTATION,
9:10:32PM CLARIFY A FEW ISSUES.
9:10:33PM WHAT THE PROJECT PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNING
9:10:34PM REGULATIONS, RESPECTIVE OF THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD,
9:10:42PM ESPECIALLY ON THAT POINT, AND MY REPORT AND PRESENTATION HAS
9:10:47PM BEEN SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD AS WELL SO YOU CAN CONSULT
9:10:49PM WITH THAT AS WELL.
9:10:50PM THERE ARE REALLY TWO LAND USE CONCERNS OTHER THAN THE
9:10:53PM TRAFFIC ISSUES WHICH WAS ADDRESSED AND A LOT OF THE OTHER
9:10:59PM TREE ISSUES WHICH ARE OBVIOUSLY KNOWN AND ADDRESSED.
9:11:02PM ONE IS INTENSITY.
9:11:03PM AND THE SECOND IS THE SCREENING OF THE PROJECT.
9:11:07PM YOU KNOW, THE PRESERVATION OF TREES ON THE SITE, ESPECIALLY
9:11:11PM FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD IS REALLY
9:11:14PM OF THE INITIAL VISUAL IMPACT.
9:11:17PM WITH THE TWO USES THAT I PROPOSE, THE PROJECT IS ENTITLED
9:11:24PM TO -- ENTITLED TO CONSIDERATION OF F.A.R. OF UP TO --
9:11:49PM DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS HOW TO GET THIS TO WORK?
9:11:55PM IT WORKED BEFORE.
9:12:02PM OKAY, THANK YOU.
9:12:07PM SO TO SUMMARIZE, THE TWO USES, 1.5 F.A.R. AND FIVE STORIES.
9:12:15PM THAT'S SPECIFICALLY SPELLED OUT FOR THE CMU-35 CATEGORY.
9:12:18PM AND WE PARTNERED WITH STAFF.
9:12:20PM THEY WERE ENCOURAGING US TO LOOK AT AS MANY STORIES AS WE
9:12:26PM COULD.
9:12:29PM RECOGNIZING THE ADJACENT USES, WE REDUCED OUR PLANS TO FOUR
9:12:35PM STORIES ONLY WITH A BUILDING SETBACK THEY'LL FURTHER GO
9:12:39PM INTO.
9:12:39PM AND F.A.R. IS 1.26.
9:12:42PM SO WE ARE NOWHERE NEAR THE MAXIMUM THAT HE COULD BE
9:12:44PM CONSIDERED.
9:12:48PM NEXT, THIS IS REALLY COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT CONCERNING THE
9:12:53PM GANDY MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
9:12:55PM AS YOU SEE HERE IN YOUR OWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, GANDY IS A
9:13:00PM TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
9:13:03PM AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION I EXPLAINED, AND THE LANGUAGE
9:13:05PM USED IN THE PLAN IS IT'S FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND
9:13:08PM INTENSIFICATION.
9:13:09PM AND THAT DOESN'T MEAN UNLIMITED INTENSIFICATION.
9:13:12PM IT MEANS VERY CAREFUL INTENSIFICATION.
9:13:16PM AND WE'LL SHOW YOU HOW WE HAVE DONE THAT.
9:13:18PM THE GANDY MIXED USE CORRIDOR, WE ARE A PART OF IT.
9:13:22PM WE ARE NOT INTRUDING WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH.
9:13:26PM WE ARE AT THE PERIPHERY OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
9:13:29PM IT'S EXACTLY THE KIND OF SITUATION WHERE INTENSIFICATION CAN
9:13:32PM WORK IF IT'S PROPERLY DONE.
9:13:34PM HERE YOU SEE GANDY BOULEVARD IS CLEARLY HIGHLY
9:13:37PM COMMERCIALIZED.
9:13:39PM THE EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK IS REALLY KIND OF IN DISARRAY,
9:13:43PM MULTIPLE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE VIOLATION.
9:13:46PM THIS, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS WHAT GANDY BOULEVARD WILL LOOK
9:13:49PM LIKE. THIS IS LOOKING EAST ON GANDY.
9:13:53PM THE LINE YOU SEE THERE IS THE OFFICE.
9:13:55PM THERE'S BEEN SOME CONCERN THAT WE ARE USING THE OFFICE TO
9:14:00PM KIND OF INCREASE INTENSITY.
9:14:05PM I BEG TO DIFFER.
9:14:06PM IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, THIS VERY PERMANENT LOCATION OF
9:14:10PM OFFICE, THIS IS A REAL LEGITIMATE MIXED USE PROJECT, SO THE
9:14:14PM 1.26 F.A.R. WHICH IS LESS THAN 1.5.
9:14:19PM WE ARE KIND OF POINTING HERE TO SOME KIND OF SITUATION ON
9:14:23PM THE GROUND WITH RESPECT TO SCREENING ALONG THE NORTHERN END.
9:14:27PM I WANTED TO SHOW YOU PICTURES, BECAUSE THERE IS A
9:14:31PM COMBINATION OF LARGE TREES ON THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH,
9:14:33PM WHICH YOU SEE KIND OF HIGHLIGHTED ON THE LEFT PICTURE.
9:14:36PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:14:39PM AS YOU CAN SEE THAT TREE IS ON ADJACENT NORTH OF THE
9:14:43PM PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
9:14:44PM THERE'S A TEN FOOT WALL WHICH EXTENDS THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF
9:14:47PM THE ALLEY, THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY, WHICH IS AN EXISTING
9:14:50PM STREAM, AND THEN THERE'S SEVERAL STRUCTURES AT THE REAR OF
9:14:54PM THOSE PROPERTIES WHICH ALSO PROVIDES REAL IMPORTANT AND
9:15:00PM EFFECTIVE RESULTS.
9:15:00PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:15:01PM >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY.
9:15:02PM A MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA MINUTES?
9:15:04PM >> SO MOVED.
9:15:05PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
9:15:08PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR?
9:15:10PM ANY OPPOSED?
9:15:13PM THANK YOU.
9:15:13PM >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
9:15:15PM ANOTHER PICTURE SHOWS SCREENING TO THE PROPERTY LOOKING
9:15:20PM SOUTH ONTO OUR SITE.
9:15:22PM AS YOU CAN SEE, ALL OF THESE TREES, THEY ARE EITHER ON THE
9:15:25PM RIGHT-HAND SIDE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY, THE CANOPY EXTENDING
9:15:30PM ONTO THE PROPERTY, OR IN THE CASE WHAT YOU SEE TO THE LEFT,
9:15:34PM THOSE ARE THE TWO THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE PRESERVING THAT WE
9:15:39PM HAVE TO WORK VERY HARD WITH CITY STAFF, AND PLAN TO GET
9:15:42PM DONE.
9:15:44PM THIS IS ANOTHER PICTURE FROM THE PROPERTY IF HE NORTHEAST
9:15:48PM CORNER.
9:15:49PM THERE YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A LOT OF TREES NOT ONLY ON-SITE
9:15:51PM BUT IN THE MIDDLE THAT CANOPY THAT YOU ARE SEEING, THAT'S
9:15:54PM THE 30-INCH OAK AND THE TREES THAT WERE ALSO SUCCESSFULLY
9:16:00PM GOING TO BE PRESERVING AND THAT'S PART OF THE PLAN THAT'S
9:16:04PM ALREADY APPROVED BY TRANSPORTATION.
9:16:05PM THE BUILDING SETBACK, DOES NOT CREATE AN ISSUE, AS YOU SEE
9:16:11PM ON THE CG OPTION WHICH THE SITE LINE WHICH YOU SEE IN RED
9:16:16PM WOULD BE MORE OF AN ISSUE FOR THE NEIGHBORS.
9:16:18PM INSTEAD, BY STEPPING IT BACK, WE ARE REALLY AT THE GREEN
9:16:22PM SITE LINE, AND YOU CAN HEAR A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE
9:16:26PM VISUAL IMPACT.
9:16:27PM I HAVE PROVIDED THIS TO YOU BECAUSE THESE ARE SCALE DRAWINGS
9:16:30PM WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO SEE THE OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF WHAT
9:16:35PM SITE LINES WOULD BE AND HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT COULD
9:16:38PM OTHERWISE BE DEVELOPED ON THE SITE.
9:16:41PM SO OUR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ON THE NORTH PORTION WITH THE
9:16:45PM SETBACK.
9:16:45PM THE SETBACKS SHOWN.
9:16:50PM THIS IS ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT IT.
9:16:52PM NOT ONLY DO WE HAVE THAT SETBACK WHICH YOU SEE ON THE LEFT,
9:16:55PM THE 32 TO THE 45 SITE LINE.
9:17:00PM BUTCH IF YOU SEE THAT GREEN SITE LINE, EVEN ON THE TO RIGHT
9:17:04PM PICTURE, AN ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME OF 35-FOOT HIGH
9:17:09PM HEIGHT WOULD BE GREATER THAN THE SITE LINE WITH A GREATER
9:17:13PM VISUAL IMPACT ON OUR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
9:17:17PM THIS IS A SUMMARY OF WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO WITH THE ALLEY,
9:17:20PM AND THAT GRAY AREA YOU SEE IS THE ALLEY OF THE
9:17:23PM TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT HAS ALREADY APPROVED IT.
9:17:26PM YOU SEE THAT WE ARE SAVING A TREE ON-SITE ON THE WESTERN
9:17:30PM PORTION OF OUR SITE, POINTING, THE T TWO TREES WE MENTIONED
9:17:37PM TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY AND THE CLUSTER ON THE EAST
9:17:40PM SIDE.
9:17:41PM FURTHERMORE AND IMPORTANTLY, YOU SEE THAT BLUE ARROW WHICH
9:17:44PM SHOWS A NORTHBOUND TO EASTBOUND TURNING MOVEMENT ON THE
9:17:47PM ALLEY?
9:17:48PM WE ARE GOING TO HAVE DIRECTIONAL -- LIMITED DIRECTIONAL
9:17:52PM MOVEMENT ON THAT ALLEY SO THAT EXISTING TRAFFIC CAN ONLY
9:17:56PM LEAVE ONTO GANDY.
9:18:02PM THE SHIFT TO THE EAST THAT MR. BENTLEY TALKED ABOUT, YOU SEE
9:18:08PM ON THE WEST SIDE.
9:18:09PM THAT'S A 65-INCH SPECIMEN TREE OF ALL THE GRANDS THAT ON THE
9:18:15PM PROPERTY.
9:18:16PM IT'S AN INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT TREE PRESERVATION ACT ON OUR
9:18:22PM PART, AND ALSO PRESERVES SOME ADDITIONAL PALMS ALONG GANDY.
9:18:28PM THIS KIND OF SUMMARIZES TREE PRESERVATION.
9:18:31PM THE IMPORTANT POINT IN THIS SLIDE THAT I WANT YOU TO LOCK IN
9:18:35PM IS YOU HAVE THE CORE OF THE BUILDING, WHICH IS THE AREA
9:18:39PM WITHIN WHICH WE ARE HAVING TO REMOVE TREES.
9:18:42PM ANY REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE IS ONLY 160 STREET EAST ON
9:18:46PM GANDY TO THE ALLEY.
9:18:48PM ANY REDEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK CLOSELY AT
9:18:51PM REMOVING THOSE TREES AND WILL LIKELY HAVE TO REMOVE THOSE
9:18:54PM TREES.
9:18:54PM WE CERTAINLY HAVE TO CONSIDER THE BUILDING IN THE ENVELOPE.
9:19:00PM AS YOU SEE ON THE LEFT, THE REDEVELOPMENT, AND THE ONE
9:19:05PM OBJECTIVE OF IT TALKS ABOUT THE NEW TREE ORDINANCE, WHICH IS
9:19:09PM NEW POLICY BY THE CITY, REQUIRING THAT -- ALLOWING YOU TO
9:19:16PM REMOVE TREES IF YOU COULD NOT RECONFIGURE THE PROPERTY.
9:19:20PM WE CAN'T ROTATE THE BUILDING ON ITS AXIS.
9:19:23PM WE CAN'T TRIM THE BUILDING WITHOUT.
9:19:27PM THIS IS AN EXTENSION, AND THAT'S WHY WE ASK FOR THE WAIVER.
9:19:34PM BECAUSE IT DEVIATES FROM THE STANDARD.
9:19:36PM THIS SHOWS THE ADDITIONAL SCREENING THAT WE ARE TALKING
9:19:40PM ABOUT, 65-GALLON, WE ARE GOING TO INSTALL THOSE.
9:19:46PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:19:50PM THEN JUST IN SUMMARY, YOU CAN SEE THERE THAT THE EXISTING
9:19:53PM SCREENING, AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND THE TREE
9:19:57PM PRESERVATION, ARE ALL IMPORTANT ITEMS THAT WE ARE GOING TO
9:20:02PM IMPLEMENT TO MAKE THIS PROJECT COMPATIBLE WITH THE
9:20:04PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
9:20:05PM THANK YOU.
9:20:05PM >>MARK BENTLEY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I HAD TWO OTHER PEOPLE I
9:20:10PM THOUGHT WERE IMPORTANT, TWO MINUTES EACH, ONE WHO HELPED
9:20:15PM WRITE YOUR TREE ORDINANCE BEHIND ME AND I THINK THE TREE
9:20:18PM ISSUE IS VERY IMPORTANT.
9:20:19PM AND THEN MR. YATES.
9:20:21PM WE ARE LOOKING AT FIVE MINUTES TOPS AND I PROMISE.
9:20:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
9:20:25PM FIVE MORE MINUTES?
9:20:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIRMAN, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE
9:20:33PM FROM THE AMOUNT -- I DON'T MIND GIVING FIVE MORE MINUTES IF
9:20:38PM WE GIVE OTHER SIDE EQUAL OR LONGER TIME.
9:20:41PM >>LUIS VIERA: I WAS GOING TO SAY.
9:20:42PM THAT WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.
9:20:45PM WHILE IT'S NOT A FREE FOR ALL IN PUBLIC COMMENT, ET CETERA,
9:20:48PM WE WILL BE REASONABLY LIBERAL.
9:20:50PM SO LET'S DO MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
9:20:57PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
9:20:59PM ALL IN FAVOR?
9:21:00PM ANY OPPOSED?
9:21:03PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DID YOU SAY WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS
9:21:06PM GOOD FOR THE GANDER?
9:21:09PM A LITTLE LEVITY.
9:21:10PM >> MY NAME IS JOE STANWICK, CONSULTANT ARBORIST, IN
9:21:19PM BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC DOWNTOWN PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA. I HAVE
9:21:21PM BEEN SWORN IN.
9:21:23PM I AM HERE TO TALK REGARDING THE SCIENCE OF THE TREES SUBJECT
9:21:27PM TO THIS MATTER.
9:21:31PM SO I SAY THIS.
9:21:34PM TWO INTERNATIONALLY CERTIFIED ARBORISTS WORKING
9:21:37PM INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER WENT IN AND ANALYZED EACH AND
9:21:40PM EVERY TREE.
9:21:42PM BOTH ARBORISTS CAME UP WITH 50% OF THE TREES BEING BAD
9:21:48PM TREES, STRUCTURALLY -- WITH STRUCTURAL DEFECTS AND HEALTH
9:21:54PM DEFECTS.
9:21:55PM SO HALF OF THE TREES THERE ARE NOT GOOD.
9:21:58PM HALF OF THE TREES THERE ARE NOT VIABLE.
9:22:03PM BUT THE BIG CONCERN IS THE DEVELOPMENT.
9:22:05PM AND I WANT TO THINK OF THE SCENARIO THAT MIGHT RING TRUER TO
9:22:12PM WHAT'S HAPPENING AS RELATED TO THE SCIENCE OF THESE TREES.
9:22:16PM SO HERE IT IS.
9:22:18PM WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A SCENARIO WHERE NO DEVELOPMENT TAKES
9:22:21PM PLACE ON THIS PARCEL.
9:22:22PM NONE.
9:22:23PM NOTHING IS BUILT.
9:22:25PM EVER.
9:22:26PM NOT EVEN A MEN'S ROOM AND A LADY'S ROOM.
9:22:29PM NOT EVEN A DRINKING FOUNTAIN.
9:22:33PM NOTHING.
9:22:33PM AND WE ARE GOING TO CONVERT IT TO A PASSIVE PARK.
9:22:36PM NOTHING WILL BE BUILT ON IT.
9:22:38PM THE MOMENT THAT THE MOBILE HOMES THAT ARE THERE NOW ARE
9:22:43PM TAKEN OFF THE PROPERTY, YOU WILL LOSE EVERY TREE ON THE
9:22:46PM PROPERTY.
9:22:47PM NO TREE WILL MAKE IT.
9:22:49PM NONE.
9:22:49PM ZERO.
9:22:50PM ZILCH.
9:22:50PM NONE.
9:22:52PM THE MOBILE HOMES ARE NO LONGER MOBILE.
9:22:55PM THEY ARE RECTANGULAR BOXES.
9:22:58PM THEY CANNOT BE PUSHED.
9:23:00PM THEY CANNOT BE PULLED.
9:23:02PM THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE
9:23:07PM DISMANTLING OF A MOBILE HOME PARK, AND IT LOOKS LIKE A WAR
9:23:11PM ZONE.
9:23:12PM SO YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BRING IN, HAVE TO, BRING IN
9:23:15PM TRACTOR, TRAILER, MOVE 18 WHEELS DOWN HIGHWAYS, TO HOOK ONTO
9:23:23PM THESE MOBILE HOMES.
9:23:23PM THE MINUTE YOU PULL THEM, THE AXLES FALL OFF.
9:23:27PM THESE HOMES ARE 30, 40, 50 YEARS OLD.
9:23:30PM THE AXLES, ARE RUSTED.
9:23:32PM THEY DON'T WORK.
9:23:33PM THE TIRES AREN'T THERE ANYMORE.
9:23:36PM THEY HAVE TO BE DRAGGED OFF THEIR MOORINGS.
9:23:39PM AND WHEN THEY ARE DRAGGED OFF THEIR MOORINGS THEY ARE GOING
9:23:42PM TO RIP INTO THE GROUND A FOOT, 18 INCHES, TWO FEET.
9:23:47PM MUCH YOU CANNOT TURN THESE MOBILE HOMES.
9:23:50PM SO THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE PUSHED TO MAKE A TURN.
9:23:54PM AND THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE DONE WITH FRONT-END LOADERS.
9:23:58PM GENTLEMEN, THE TREES ARE JUST NOT GOING TO SURVIVE.
9:24:01PM WHY?
9:24:03PM NOW WE HAVE COMPACTED SOILS.
9:24:05PM WE HAVE CEMENT SLABS THAT THE MOBILE HOMES ARE SITTING UPON,
9:24:11PM AND THAT ARE NEXT TO THE MOBILE HOMES.
9:24:13PM THESE CEMENT PADS HAVE TO BE TORN UP WITH FRONT-END LOADERS
9:24:17PM AND THE EQUIPMENT, THE ROOTS OF THESE TREES ARE GOING TO GET
9:24:21PM DESTROYED.
9:24:21PM SO LET'S TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT A COUPLE OF GRAND TREES THAT
9:24:27PM MY GOOD FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES WITH NATURAL RESOURCES
9:24:33PM CONSIDERED ACTIVE DEVELOPER TO CONSIDER FOR PRESERVATION.
9:24:39PM SO HERE IS ONE OF THOSE TREES.
9:24:41PM THIS IS A TREE, A GRAND TREE THAT MR. DINGFELDER ASKED, THAT
9:24:50PM MR. KNOX HAD A PICTURE OF. THIS IS GRAND TREE NUMBER 36.
9:24:54PM I PUT THE TAG NUMBERS ON ALL OF THESE TREES.
9:24:59PM SO WE CAN LOOK AT THIS TREE.
9:25:01PM YOU ARE GOING DO IMMEDIATELY NOTICE SOME THINGS.
9:25:04PM THIS MOBILE HOME CANNOT BE PULLED THIS WAY BECAUSE THERE'S A
9:25:08PM GRAND TREE IN FRONT OF IT SO IT'S GOT TO BE DRAGGED TO THE
9:25:12PM NORTH.
9:25:13PM AND TO THE NORTH IT'S A CEMENT BLOCK WALL, THE NEIGHBORING
9:25:18PM WALL, WHERE TWO BIG TREES OVER 15 INCHES OF DIAMETER ARE
9:25:24PM GOING TO BE PRESERVED AT A COST OF $30,000.
9:25:28PM THIS CLIENT IS PUTTING MORE MONEY INTO PRESERVING TREES THAN
9:25:31PM MOST PEOPLE PUT IN INTO THEIR LANDSCAPING.
9:25:35PM >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, SIR.
9:25:36PM MR. BENTLEY, YOU SAID YOU HAD TWO SPEAKERS, CORRECT?
9:25:39PM >>MARK BENTLEY: YES.
9:25:41PM IT LOOKS LIKE WE ARE NOT GOING TO MAKE IT WITH
9:25:43PM TRANSPORTATION BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON TRAFFIC HE'S
9:25:46PM AVAILABLE.
9:25:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: NO, NO, I'M FINE, IN OTHER WORDS, TO GIVE YOU
9:25:49PM YOUR TIME.
9:25:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I HAVE A QUESTION BUT WITHOUT THE TIME.
9:25:54PM I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING ABOUT THE MOBILE HOMES.
9:25:56PM AT ONE TIME IN MY LIFE I RAN ONE OF THE LARGEST MOBILE HOME
9:26:00PM OPERATIONS IN THE COUNTRY.
9:26:02PM I HAVE TO DISAGREE WITH YOU.
9:26:05PM FIRST OFF, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO SAVE THE MOBILE HOMES.
9:26:07PM ARE YOU GOING TO SAVE THEM?
9:26:09PM >> NO.
9:26:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THEN MY QUESTION TO YOU, SIR, IS WHY ARE
9:26:15PM YOU DRAGGING THEM OFF WHEN YOU CAN JUST TEAR THEM APART
9:26:18PM RIGHT THERE WITHOUT DAMAGING ANYTHING?
9:26:20PM >> HOW ARE YOU GOING TO TEAR THEM APART, SIR?
9:26:23PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF THEY ARE THAT OLD ALREADY, THE INSIDE
9:26:25PM OF IT, IT'S PLYWOOD, MORE LIKELY PLYWOOD COMPRESSED.
9:26:31PM >> OKAY.
9:26:32PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE SIZE OF IT, ALUMINUM IS TAKEN OFF BY
9:26:36PM RIVETS.
9:26:37PM YOU CAN TAKE THEM OFF.
9:26:38PM YOU CAN DISMANTLE A MOBILE HOME IN ONE DAY.
9:26:45PM I USED TO HAVE TO DO THIS.
9:26:46PM NOT PERSONALLY.
9:26:47PM I HAD TO PAY SOMEBODY TO DO IT.
9:26:49PM TAKE THE AXLES OFF, PUT IN NEW AXLES AND TIRES, BRING IN THE
9:26:55PM NEXT ONE.
9:26:55PM >> STILL HAVE BEEN TO BUST UP THE CEMENT, SIR.
9:26:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
9:27:00PM >> HOW ARE YOU GOING TO PUT ANYTHING THERE?
9:27:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ABOUT 15 TO 20 FEET OUT, THE ROOTS.
9:27:06PM AND WHAT I AM SAYING IS, THE MOBILE HOMES CAN BE DISMANTLED
9:27:10PM WITHOUT MOVING THEM.
9:27:11PM YOU CAN CUT UP THE FRAME.
9:27:12PM THE FRAMES ARE MADE OF STEEL.
9:27:14PM YOU CAN CUT THEM UP IN PIECES AND MOVE THEM OUT.
9:27:17PM >> FINE, SIR.
9:27:18PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I PAID SOMEBODY TO DO THAT.
9:27:20PM >> AND I'M WITH YOU 100% AND I BELIEVE YOU 100%.
9:27:24PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WHAT I AM SAYING IS THERE ARE OTHER
9:27:26PM OPTIONS INSTEAD OF THE ONE OPTION YOU BROUGHT UP.
9:27:28PM >> WHAT DO WE DO WITH THE CEMENT PAD?
9:27:32PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE CEMENT PADS.
9:27:34PM I AM TALKING ABOUT THE TREES.
9:27:35PM >> AND I WILL CERTAINLY BOW TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE.
9:27:38PM I CONSULTED AN ARBORIST --
9:27:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT AN ARBORIST.
9:27:43PM >> NO, NO.
9:27:44PM I BOW TO YOU. IF YOU SAY THE HOMES CAN BE DISMANTLED, FINE.
9:27:49PM I STAND CORRECTED.
9:27:50PM THE HOMES CAN BE DISMANTLED.
9:27:52PM YOU STILL NEED EQUIPMENT TO CARRY IT OUT.
9:27:54PM YOU STILL HAVE TO BUST UP THE CEMENT PADS.
9:27:56PM AND, SIR, THE TREES HAVE ALREADY BEEN IMPACTED BY ALL OF
9:27:59PM THIS.
9:28:04PM RIGHT NOW, YOU HAVE GOT MOBILE HOMES SITTING OVER ROOT
9:28:07PM SYSTEMS.
9:28:08PM NEVER MIND HOW YOU GET THEM OUT.
9:28:10PM YOU ARE RIGHT, I AM WRONG.
9:28:12PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, I AM NOT SAYING WHO IS RIGHT OR
9:28:14PM WRONG.
9:28:14PM I JUST MADE OTHER OPTIONS.
9:28:16PM I WANT TO SAY ON THE RECORD.
9:28:21PM THERE'S ANOTHER WAY TO DO THAT.
9:28:23PM THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS.
9:28:24PM >> VERY GOOD, SIR.
9:28:26PM THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS THAT I DIDN'T KNOW AND YOU DID.
9:28:28PM NONETHELESS, WE HAVE GOT CEMENT PADS THAT ARE THERE THAT
9:28:32PM HAVE TO COME OUT.
9:28:34PM WITH ANY DEVELOPMENT.
9:28:35PM A PASSIVE PARK, NO MATTER WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO PUT THERE,
9:28:38PM YOU HAVE TO TAKE THE CEMENT OUT.
9:28:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HOW MANY INCHES IS THE IS THE CEMENT?
9:28:48PM >> I'M SORRY, SIR?
9:28:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE SIZE AND AMOUNT OF CEMENT ON THE
9:28:54PM SLAB.
9:28:56PM 6 INCHES OR 8 INCHES?
9:28:57PM >> I THOUGHT I SAW SIX, SIR.
9:29:02PM BUT IT'S GOT TO BE BUSTED OUT.
9:29:04PM AND THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE DONE WITH EQUIPMENT.
9:29:07PM BUT I THINK ANOTHER THING THAT WE NEED TO REMEMBER IS THAT
9:29:10PM WESTBOUND THE CONDITION OF THE TREES, AFTER HALF OF THEM
9:29:14PM BEING BAD AND AT LEAST HALF OF THE GRAND OAK TREES, WE
9:29:19PM ALREADY KNOW THESE TREES HAVE BEEN NEGATIVELY AFFECTED BY
9:29:21PM THE MOBILE HOMES SITTING OVER THE ROOT SYSTEMS, AND THE
9:29:24PM CEMENT SLABS SITTING OVER THE ROOT SYSTEM.
9:29:27PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT DISAGREEING AND DEBATING.
9:29:30PM I AM JUST BRINGING UP THE FACT.
9:29:31PM SOME MAY BE BAD AND SOME MAY NOT BE SO GOOD BUT WHAT HAPPENS
9:29:35PM TO THE ONES THAT ARE NEAR PEST OR NEAR A LIFE SPAN OF 50
9:29:39PM YEARS?
9:29:39PM >> AS RELATES TO THE TREES, SIR?
9:29:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR.
9:29:42PM >> SIR, I DIDN'T SEE THAT.
9:29:44PM THEY MAY BE THERE.
9:29:45PM I DIDN'T SEE THAT.
9:29:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU.
9:29:48PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
9:29:53PM YOUR TIME CONTINUES.
9:29:56PM THANK YOU, SIR.
9:30:13PM MICHAEL YATES.
9:30:17PM I WILL WALK THROUGH THE TRANSPORTATION REAL BRIEFLY.
9:30:19PM I KNOW MARK BENTLEY ALREADY WENT THROUGH THE TRIP
9:30:22PM GENERATION.
9:30:22PM I JUST WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE ACCESS FOR THE
9:30:25PM PROJECT AND CIRCULATION.
9:30:30PM WHAT WE HAVE IS A DRIVEWAY ON GANDY BOULEVARD.
9:30:34PM THIS WILL BE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT.
9:30:35PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:30:37PM >>LUIS VIERA: OBVIOUSLY, SIR, YOUR TIME IS UP.
9:30:42PM IN MY OPINION, IT'S UP.
9:30:43PM YOU WERE GIVEN TEN MINUTES.
9:30:44PM THANK YOU.
9:30:49PM ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT?
9:30:50PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
9:30:52PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
9:30:52PM MR. CARNEGIE, WELCOME.
9:31:03PM WE HAVE KNOWN EACH OTHER A LONG TIME.
9:31:05PM I RESPECT YOUR CREDENTIALS AND PROFESSIONALISM, ASIP,
9:31:10PM ET CETERA.
9:31:10PM TWO THINGS WHEN I LOOK AT THE DESIGN THAT I HAVE MENTIONED
9:31:14PM EARLIER JUMP OUT AT ME.
9:31:16PM NUMBER ONE, THE DUMPSTERS ON THE BACKSIDE.
9:31:20PM MR. BENTLEY SORT OF REBUTTED EARLY ON, THERE'S ALREADY
9:31:23PM EXISTING DUMPSTERS.
9:31:24PM WELL, THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT BETTER.
9:31:26PM THAT DOESN'T MAKE AT GOOD DESIGN.
9:31:31PM ANYTIME I HAVE EVER RUN FOR COUNCIL, I ALWAYS SAID I AM NOT
9:31:34PM AGAINST NEW DEVELOPMENT, I JUST WANT GOOD DEVELOPMENT.
9:31:39PM I WANT ALL GOOD DEVELOPMENT.
9:31:42PM I WANT THE BEST POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
9:31:45PM SO THE DUMPSTER JUMPED OUT AT ME, AND LIKE WHY CAN'T IT BE
9:31:50PM ON ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER, OR EVEN ON THE STREET?
9:31:55PM EVEN ON THE GANDY SIDE.
9:31:57PM AS OPPOSED TO IMPOSING THE DUMPSTER NOISE TOWARD THE NORTH,
9:32:03PM TOWARD THOSE FOLKS, NUMBER ONE.
9:32:07PM NUMBER TWO IS I THOUGHT I SAW BALCONIES OVERLOOKING --
9:32:14PM LOOKING TO THE NORTH.
9:32:15PM AND AGAIN, ON SOME OF THESE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS ON HAWTHORNE
9:32:19PM WITH THE SWIMMING POOLS, AND THEY ARE CURRENTLY VERY PRIVATE
9:32:22PM BACKYARDS, I'M NOT SURE I AM GOING TO BE REAL KEEN ON
9:32:26PM BALCONIES OVERLOOKING, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE RENTALS.
9:32:38PM I DON'T KNOW HOW CRITICAL BALCONIES ARE.
9:32:41PM THOSE ARE JUST SORT OF TWO DESIGN QUESTIONS I HAD FOR YOU
9:32:44PM SPECIFICALLY.
9:32:46PM >> SURE.
9:32:48PM THE FIRST QUESTION ON SOLID WASTE IS WE LOOKED AT A NUMBER
9:32:52PM OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS.
9:32:53PM INSTEAD OF HAVING ROLL-OUT CONTAINERS, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A
9:32:57PM LOT OF -- WHICH BASICALLY MAKE THE BUILDING TALLER, BECAUSE
9:33:01PM THEN THE FIRST FLOOR WILL HAVE TO BE OVER 20 FEET.
9:33:07PM FOR THAT MACHINE.
9:33:08PM WE ARE HAVING A MORE CLOSED DOOR FOR THE ALLEY SO THERE'S NO
9:33:14PM NOISE EMANATING TO THE ALLEY ON A NORMAL BASIS.
9:33:17PM OCCASIONALLY, PICK UP FOUR CUBIC YARDS WILL BE ROLLED OUT TO
9:33:24PM THE AREA IN THE ALLEY, AND THE ALLEY, THE NEIGHBORS, FIVE
9:33:35PM CONTAINERS RIGHT NOW.
9:33:36PM THIS WILL REDUCE TO ONE CONSOLIDATED PICKUP POINT INSTEAD OF
9:33:41PM HAVING THE PICKUP BE SPREAD ACROSS THE ENTIRE ALLEY, JUST
9:33:52PM CERTAIN TIMES WHEN IT WOULD BE PICKED UP, AND YOU DON'T
9:33:56PM CONTROL, UNFORTUNATELY.
9:33:58PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S MY CONCERN.
9:33:59PM >> YES.
9:34:01PM WE WOULD BE WILLING?
9:34:04PM >>: THE CITY'S SOLID WASTE, IF THEY WANT TO COME AT 6:30 IN
9:34:08PM THE MORNING, TO PICK UP DUMPSTERS, THEN TO ME WE HAVE A
9:34:12PM PROBLEM.
9:34:13PM >> WE ARE HAPPY TO ENTER A TIME LIMITATION THAT CAN WORK FOR
9:34:18PM THE CITY, OKAY?
9:34:21PM WE HAVEN'T PROPOSED ANY AND NOBODY HAS ASKED US TO PROPOSE
9:34:24PM ANY.
9:34:25PM BUT ANYWAY, THE ROLL-OUT MANUALLY.
9:34:28PM YOU HAVE A FRONT LOADER DUMP THE MATERIALS INTO THE TRUCK.
9:34:32PM AND THE TRUCK CAN GO OFF.
9:34:37PM AND ALL THE TURNING RADIUS I WILL HAVE TO EVALUATE.
9:34:41PM AND THE BALCONY.
9:34:43PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE OTHER THOUGHT AS RELATED TO LOADING
9:34:45PM AND UNLOADING SINCE YOU MENTIONED IT.
9:34:49PM HOW ABOUT LITERALLY, WHERE DO PEOPLE MOVE IN AND OUT OF THIS
9:34:53PM BUILDING?
9:34:53PM IS THERE A LOADING DOCK?
9:34:54PM IS THAT ALSO ON THE REAR?
9:34:56PM >> WE HAVE A LOADING AREA WHICH THE CITY HAS ASKED FOR.
9:35:06PM WE UNDERSTAND THAT.
9:35:08PM WE READ THE CODE DO MEAN A LOADING BERTH WAS REQUIRED.
9:35:20PM WHEN WE ARE DONE WITH OUR NEGOTIATIONS IS WE HAVE HAD
9:35:29PM THROUGH DESIGN AND ENGINEERING THREE PARKING SPACES ON THE
9:35:33PM ZION STREET SIDE, AND I CAN PULL THAT OUT AND SHOW IT TO YOU
9:35:38PM IN A SECOND.
9:35:39PM THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THOSE THREE PARKING SPACES CAN BE USED
9:35:44PM INTERMITTENTLY.
9:35:47PM SO THE DESIGN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AND HERE ARE THE PARKING
9:35:55PM SPACES, OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES.
9:35:57PM NOW, WE ARE ALSO OPEN TO CONTINUING TO HAVE LOADING AREA ON
9:36:04PM THIS SIDE TO ALLOW FOR IT.
9:36:09PM AND THE WAY THAT DISCUSSION -- WE SAID THERE IS A
9:36:14PM REQUIREMENT FROM ONE LOADING BERTH.
9:36:16PM CITY STAFF SAID THERE ISN'T.
9:36:18PM WE ASKED FOR A WAIVER TO MAKE IT A DIFFERENT DIMENSION THAT
9:36:23PM WOULD WORK, AS THE CODE REQUIRES.
9:36:26PM THEY SAID, TAKE OFF THAT WAIVER AND TAKE OFF THE
9:36:29PM REQUIREMENT.
9:36:30PM OKAY.
9:36:31PM WE ARE HAPPY TO PUT ON A LOADING BERTH BACK THERE.
9:36:34PM WE THINK --
9:36:40PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AGAIN, MY CONCERN FROM THE NOISE
9:36:42PM PERSPECTIVE IS IT SEEMS TO ME THAT YOU ARE BUILDING AN
9:36:46PM 80-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AND YOU NEED A LOADING AREA CLOSE
9:36:50PM TO YOUR ELEVATOR, BUT I WOULD SAY FROM A NOISE
9:36:57PM PERSPECTIVE -- AND I AM NOT AN ARCHITECT -- THAT THAT
9:37:00PM LOADING AREA SHOULD BE SOMEPLACE THAT'S NOT GOING TO IMPACT
9:37:05PM THE NORTHERN AREA.
9:37:13PM JUST FROM A MITIGATION PERSPECTIVE, THAT WOULD SEEM TO BE A
9:37:18PM NEIGHBORHOOD THING -- NEIGHBORLY THING TO DO.
9:37:21PM >> WELL, PERHAPS THEN WE CAN WORK TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY THESE
9:37:26PM PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE CLOSE TO THE CORE OF THE BUILDING,
9:37:31PM IDENTIFYING THERE AS PARKING/LOADING.
9:37:35PM I THINK IT MIGHT WORK.
9:37:36PM WE JUST HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BUILDING DESIGN, AND A BREAK IN
9:37:42PM THAT LOW WALL THERE.
9:37:49PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PARKING.
9:37:50PM >> THE REAR OF THE BUILDING WHICH YOU CANNOT SEE
9:37:52PM SCHEMATICALLY HERE HAS SETBACK.
9:37:56PM YES, THERE ARE BALCONIES THERE, AND THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO
9:38:03PM THE LOOK AND FEEL OF THE PROJECT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL --
9:38:06PM >> YOU HAD A PICTURE THAT SHOWED FROM THE REAR, SHOWS THE
9:38:10PM BALCONIES.
9:38:10PM >> YES.
9:38:14PM I THINK THAT WAS ON THE POWERPOINT. ALSO HAD THE SCREENING,
9:38:25PM THE TREES.
9:38:50PM SO ON THE THIRD FLOOR, NOT THE FOURTH FLOOR, EXCEPT ON THE
9:38:58PM WINGS, WE DO HAVE FOR THE RESIDENTS.
9:39:06PM NOW I WANT TO EMPHASIZE, THIS, BASED ON PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN
9:39:15PM FROM THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY, MR. DINGFELDER, IS WHAT THE
9:39:18PM SCREENING ALREADY IS FROM THOSE PROPERTIES, LUCKY ENOUGH TO
9:39:24PM HAVE MATURE TREES IN THOSE YARDS, LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE A TEN
9:39:28PM FOOT WALL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY, AND WE ARE LUCKY
9:39:32PM ENOUGH TO HAVE WORKED WITH A VERY EXCELLENT STAFF THAT
9:39:36PM MODIFIED THE ALLEY TO PRESERVE ADDITIONAL TREES ON OUR SIDE,
9:39:41PM AND THERE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY.
9:39:44PM SO THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF THE KIND OF CANOPIES THAT WILL
9:39:49PM REMAIN.
9:39:50PM FOR EXAMPLE, THE CANOPIES THAT I AM CIRCLING HERE, THAT'S
9:39:53PM EXACTLY THE CANOPY OF THE 26 AND 29 BACK THERE.
9:40:01PM THIS LARGE CANOPY BRANCH HERE, THAT'S ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
9:40:06PM SO THAT WON'T BE IMPACTED AT ALL.
9:40:08PM SO AS YOU THINK ABOUT THAT, I THINK YOU NEED TO LOOK AT THIS
9:40:13PM EXTENT INCLUDING THE FACT THAT THERE IS EXQUISITE SCREENING
9:40:17PM THAT'S ALREADY THERE, THAT IS SUPPLEMENTED BY THE WAY BY
9:40:20PM ADDING 65-GALLON RED CEDAR WHICH YOU SEE HERE.
9:40:27PM AND AGAIN FROM A SITE LINE PERSPECTIVE, YOU CAN SEE HOW THE
9:40:31PM SITE LINE IS REALLY MITIGATED BY TREES.
9:40:38PM SO THESE ARE -- ESPECIALLY THE SETBACKS FOR SOME DISTANCE,
9:40:44PM AND SCREENING.
9:40:46PM REMEMBER, THERE IS A 20-FOOT ALLEY THERE, A SEPARATION.
9:40:57PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
9:41:00PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: CAN YOU FIND THAT PHOTO FOR ME, THE POOL
9:41:08PM IN THE YARDS AND THE SETBACK?
9:41:12PM >> I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY THAT SHOW THAT.
9:41:45PM BUT THERE ARE BACKYARDS.
9:41:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MY CONCERN IS LOOKING AT THAT BACKYARD,
9:41:57PM ARE YOU SAYING THAT ALL OF THESE SCREENS HERE, AND YOU HAVE
9:42:02PM A SETBACK, TO LOOK OVER INTO ALL THESE BACKYARDS?
9:42:11PM >> THAT IS CORRECT.
9:42:12PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT'S A REAL CONCERN.
9:42:17PM >> IT IS CORRECT, BECAUSE YOU MAY HEAR TESTIMONY THAT ALL
9:42:23PM THESE THINGS, PROVIDE WITH YOU PICTURES, IT'S NOT ENOUGH TO
9:42:30PM MAKE A DECISION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE SCREENING WE
9:42:33PM SHOWED YOU PHOTOS OF IS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMPLISH THAT
9:42:36PM OBJECTIVE.
9:42:38PM IT'S A WORTHY OBJECTIVE.
9:42:45PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
9:42:46PM ANYONE ELSE?
9:42:47PM I HAVE A QUESTION.
9:42:48PM IN THIS -- THIS MAY NOT BE A RELEVANT FOR PURPOSES OF OUR
9:42:54PM DECISION TODAY, BUT OUT OF CURIOSITY, ARE PEOPLE PRESENT
9:42:59PM PRESENTLY LIVING THERE NOW?
9:43:00PM >> IN THE MOBILE HOME PARK?
9:43:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
9:43:02PM >> YES, SIR.
9:43:04PM >>LUIS VIERA: I MEAN, JUST AGAIN OUT OF CURIOSITY, WHAT SORT
9:43:07PM OF STANDARDS APPLY LEGALLY WITH REGARDS TO MOVING FOLKS,
9:43:10PM ET CETERA?
9:43:15PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: EXCUSE ME FOR INTERRUPTING BUT JUST TO LET
9:43:17PM YOU KNOW, RELOCATION OF MOBILE HOME PARKS BY FLORIDA
9:43:23PM STATUTE, I BELIEVE SECTION --
9:43:26PM >>LUIS VIERA: SURE.
9:43:26PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T BELIEVE -- I UNDERSTAND YOUR
9:43:28PM CURIOSITY.
9:43:29PM I RESPECT.
9:43:30PM THAT BUT I BELIEVE IT'S BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS PARTICULAR
9:43:32PM HEARING.
9:43:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
9:43:35PM AND I PRESSED MY QUESTION BY SAYING IT WOULD HAVE NO
9:43:38PM BEARING.
9:43:39PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T KNOW WHAT EFFECT IT MIGHT HAVE
9:43:41PM UPON YOUR COLLEAGUES WITH REGARDS TO BE THE DECISION.
9:43:45PM I WOULD JUST ASK COUNCIL TO BE CAUTIOUS.
9:43:56PM JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY.
9:43:57PM I AM NOT GOING TO ASK IN TERMS OF WHAT'S BEEN DONE, JUST FOR
9:44:00PM MY CURIOSITY, WHAT'S THE GOVERNING STATUTE.
9:44:04PM >>MARK BENTLEY: THE PEOPLE DON'T HAVE AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST
9:44:08PM IN THE PADS, AND SO WE HAVE A CONTRACT ON THE PROPERTY, SO
9:44:18PM IT'S NOT OUR OBLIGATION TO DO THAT, PLUS THEY DON'T MEET THE
9:44:22PM STATUTORY REQUIREMENT FOR THE LACK OF OWNERSHIP ISSUE.
9:44:27PM HOWEVER, WE HAVE REACHED OUT TO SOME OF THEM AND ALSO
9:44:30PM COORDINATED WITH METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES TO DISPLACE THEM
9:44:35PM AND GIVE THEM SLOWLY THE ABILITY TO TRANSITION OUT OF THERE.
9:44:39PM NO ONE IS GOING TO GET KICKED OUT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
9:44:42PM SO OUR CLIENTS ARE VERY SENSITIVE TO THAT AND THEY INTEND TO
9:44:44PM WORK WITH THESE PEOPLE.
9:44:46PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
9:44:46PM JUST CURIOSITY.
9:44:47PM THANK YOU, SIR.
9:44:48PM THANK YOU.
9:44:48PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [OFF MICROPHONE] FOR THE RECORD WE HAVE
9:44:54PM HAD HAD IN THE PAST --
9:44:59PM >>LUIS VIERA: ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
9:45:08PM OKAY.
9:45:08PM THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
9:45:09PM I'M SORRY?
9:45:11PM >>MARK BENTLEY: JUST TO ELABORATE ON THAT QUESTION,
9:45:15PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
9:45:17PM YOUR CODE SAYS ALL YOU NEED IS 30-GALLON TREES.
9:45:20PM WE AGREED TO CEDAR TREES IN THE BUFFERED AREA, AND CERTAIN
9:45:26PM AREAS WHERE MAYBE A HOUSE RIGHT NOW COULD SEE THE PROJECT
9:45:30PM AND STRATEGICALLY PLANT THOSE, THEY WILL BE 18 TO 20 FEET AT
9:45:34PM THE TIME OF PLANTING, OKAY?
9:45:36PM AND 65 GALLONS.
9:45:38PM SO BETWEEN -- WHAT ADAM SHOWED YOU IS NOT A NOVELTY, YOU
9:45:43PM KNOW.
9:45:44PM MOST OF THOSE PROPERTIES, THAT'S THEIR PERSPECTIVE AND
9:45:50PM SUBSTANTIAL TREES ON THEIR PROPERTY THAT AREN'T GOING TO BE
9:45:52PM TOUCHED BY US, CERTAINLY, AND WE ARE SAVING THE TREES IN THE
9:45:55PM ALLEY AND BUYING TREES.
9:45:57PM SO IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, PLUS WHAT WE ARE DOING
9:46:00PM HERE IS ACTUALLY FOR THE PROJECT TO BE HONEST WITH YOU.
9:46:07PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING ELSE?
9:46:08PM THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
9:46:10PM NEXT WE MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
9:46:15PM OH, I'M SORRY.
9:46:18PM COUNCILMAN CITRO HAD A QUESTION OF STAFF BEFORE MOVING TO
9:46:21PM PUBLIC COMMENT.
9:46:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PLEASE INDULGE ME IN THIS.
9:46:24PM MR. KNOX, IF YOU COULD, LACHONE.
9:46:29PM I DON'T KNOW WHO WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION.
9:46:32PM THERE WERE TREES ON THAT LOT ACCORDING TO THE NEW TREE
9:46:37PM POLICY, THERE IS A 45% AREA FOR BUILDING.
9:46:41PM I DON'T WANT TO GET MRS. KERT OUT.
9:46:45PM THAT'S WHY I AM ASKING ONE OF YOU TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION.
9:46:49PM UNDER THE TREE ORDINANCE.
9:46:50PM >> YES, IT WOULD NEED TO BE -- FOR THAT TO TAKE EFFECT,
9:46:59PM GIVEN THE SIZE OF THIS LOT.
9:47:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE COMES MY HYPOTHETICAL.
9:47:06PM IN THE SITE PLANS YOU HAVE HERE, BEAR WITH ME, THERE IS
9:47:09PM APPROXIMATELY EIGHT RS-60 LOTS ABOVE IT.
9:47:14PM IF THIS WAS ON THOSE RS-60 LOTS AND THEY WERE ON THE
9:47:20PM INDIVIDUAL AND WE GO BACK TO THE TREE ORDINANCE WITH BE 45%
9:47:23PM OF THE BUILDABLE LOT, FOLLOW ME ON THIS, HOW MANY OF THOSE
9:47:27PM TREES WOULD BE ABLE TO BE REMOVED FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION?
9:47:32PM >> HARD TO SAY.
9:47:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
9:47:36PM THAT'S ALL I NEED TO KNOW.
9:47:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
9:47:39PM NEXT WE MOVE TO PUBLIC COMMENT, IF ANYONE IS HEAR FOR ITEM
9:47:41PM NUMBER 10, PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME.
9:47:43PM AND DO ME A FAVOR.
9:47:45PM JUST SO WE GET A SENSE OF HOW MANY FOLKS WE HAVE HERE
9:47:47PM PLANNING ON SPEAKING, FUR PLANNING ON SPEAKING, CAN YOU
9:47:51PM PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND?
9:47:52PM OKAY.
9:47:54PM GO AHEAD.
9:47:57PM PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
9:47:58PM HAS EVERYONE BEEN SWORN IN HONOR IS PLANNING ON SPEAKING?
9:48:03PM OKAY, LET'S SWEAR THEM IN.
9:48:04PM ANOTHER ROUND.
9:48:05PM (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK)
9:48:11PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MRS. MANDELL HAS TWO NAMES
9:48:19PM ON A SPEAKER WAIVER FORM.
9:48:22PM COULD YOU ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR PRESENCE?
9:48:24PM LARRY KIM.
9:48:25PM THANK YOU.
9:48:25PM MARY KEY.
9:48:28PM THANK YOU.
9:48:29PM AND YOU WILL NOT BE SPEAKING TONIGHT?
9:48:33PM THANK YOU SO MUCH.
9:48:36PM TWO ADDITIONAL MINUTES.
9:48:37PM >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY BEFORE OUR ESTEEMED FORMER CITY
9:48:40PM ATTORNEY SPEAKS, CAN I ASK EVERYONE WHO IS PLANNING ON
9:48:43PM SPEAKING IF YOU ARE PHYSICALLY ABLE TO DO, PLEASE LINE UP
9:48:45PM AGAINST THE WALL TO BE MY LEFT, YOUR RIGHT, IF YOU COULD,
9:48:49PM PLEASE, JUST SO WE HAVE A GOOD IDEA.
9:48:51PM I APPRECIATE IT.
9:48:52PM GO AHEAD.
9:48:52PM >>JULIA MANDELL: I'M WITH THE LAW FIRM OF GRAY ROBINSON 401
9:48:58PM EAST JACKSON STREET.
9:48:59PM AND I DID SUBMIT A MEMORANDUM TO ALL OF YOU, AND -- I'M
9:49:06PM SORRY.
9:49:11PM SORRY ABOUT THAT.
9:49:12PM I JUMPED THE GUN.
9:49:14PM I DID SUBMIT A MEMORANDUM TO YOU.
9:49:15PM I HAVE GIVEN THAT TO MR. BENTLEY FOR THE BENEFIT THAT I HAD
9:49:19PM SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL.
9:49:20PM AND A LEGAL ARGUMENT, AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE ALL OF THAT
9:49:27PM TIME.
9:49:28PM HOWEVER, I DO WANT TO POINT OUT A FEW THINGS TO YOU.
9:49:30PM AS I SAID IN MY MEMORANDUM, I DO REPRESENT MANY OF THE
9:49:33PM PROPERTY OWNERS THAT LIVE ON THE 300 BLOCK OF THE -- 2,000
9:49:38PM BLOCK AND 2900 BLOCK OF HAWTHORNE AVENUE, AND THERE IS A BIG
9:49:42PM CONCERN ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR ZONING APPLICATION.
9:49:45PM AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THE CONTEXT OF IT, AND
9:49:48PM THAT'S WHY I HAVE ADDED BE, TO CLARIFY, THE COMPREHENSIVE
9:49:54PM PLAN PROVISION BE AS RELATES TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
9:49:58PM AND IN ESSENCE WHAT IT SAYS IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND
9:50:03PM ZONING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHED
9:50:09PM LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION.
9:50:11PM AND THAT'S IN ESSENCE WHAT THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS
9:50:13PM DOING.
9:50:13PM IT HAS TEN, NOW NINE WAIVERS.
9:50:15PM IT IS ASKING TO REMOVE A TREMENDOUS NUMBER OF TREES.
9:50:19PM IT IS SEEKING TO DEVELOP AS MUCH OF THIS PARTICULAR LOT AS
9:50:23PM POSSIBLE, AND IN FACT IT'S ALSO ASKING FOR AN INCREASE IN
9:50:28PM DENSITY BY HAVING A MIXED USE PROJECT WHICH IS A BALANCING
9:50:33PM VERY LARGE APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH 700 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE.
9:50:36PM AND WITH THAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL DENSITY.
9:50:41PM I WAS FASCINATED BY THE TESTIMONY BY MR. BENTLEY, AND HE'S
9:50:48PM VERY GOOD AT WHAT HE DOES.
9:50:50PM IF HE IS IN FACT ACCURATE THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED CG RIGHT
9:50:53PM NOW.
9:50:53PM YOU CAN USE THIS UNDER ITS ZONING CLASSIFICATION UNDER
9:50:57PM MULTIFAMILY.
9:50:57PM IF THEY ARE RIGHT AND THEN I AM NOT REALLY 100% SURE WHY
9:51:02PM THEY ARE HERE, BECAUSE IN ESSENCE ALL THIS PLAN IS DOING IS
9:51:05PM ASKING FOR WAIVERS AND ASKING FOR AN INCREASE IN DENSITY.
9:51:09PM I ALSO HAD SOME ISSUES AND CONCERNS WITH SOME OF THE
9:51:12PM TESTIMONY I WAS HEARING, BECAUSE I DID REACH OUT TO
9:51:15PM MR. BENTLEY.
9:51:16PM HE DID HAVE A MEETING WITH SOME HOMEOWNERS.
9:51:20PM IT CAME UP WITH NOT A CONCLUSION BUT WE AT LEAST DID TRY TO
9:51:23PM HAVE A DIALOGUE, AND I KNOW MR. BENTLEY APPRECIATED THAT WE
9:51:26PM TRIED TO HAVE A DIALOGUE.
9:51:27PM DOESN'T MEAN IT WAS SUCCESSFUL BUT WE AT LEAST MADE THE
9:51:30PM EFFORT.
9:51:31PM AND WHAT I AM HEARING TODAY IS ABOUT A LOT OF CONDITIONS AND
9:51:35PM THINGS THAT THEY WANT TO ADD TO THE SITE PLAN THAT I HAVE
9:51:37PM NEVER HEARD BEFORE, NEVER SEEN BEFORE, AND IN FACT
9:51:40PM MR. BENTLEY KNOWS HOW TO GET IN TOUCH WITH ME AND HE HAS
9:51:44PM NEVER GIVEN ME SOME OF THESE NEW REQUIREMENTS.
9:51:47PM ONE OF THE THINGS I DO WANT TO POINT OUT IS THERE'S A LOT OF
9:51:50PM CONVERSATION AS RELATED TO A TREE WITHIN THE ALLEY.
9:51:53PM AND I WANT TO PUT ON THE ELMO A COPY OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY IN
9:52:00PM THE SITE PLAN REVISION SHEET.
9:52:02PM THE ONLY THING FOR THOSE TWO TREES IN THE ALLEY IS THE
9:52:08PM FOLLOWING STATEMENT.
9:52:08PM THE PORTION OF THE ALLEY THAT GOES AROUND THE 27-INCH AND
9:52:11PM 29-INCH TREE CAN, IN A TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT WILL BE
9:52:16PM NEEDED FOR THE PORTION THAT GOES ON THE PROPERTY.
9:52:22PM I SEE TWO ISSUES WITH THAT.
9:52:27PM AND MR. BENTLEY RIGHTFULLY COULD SUBMIT HIS COMMENTS.
9:52:30PM ALL OF THESE ISSUES ARE RIGHT-OF-WAY ISSUES.
9:52:32PM THEY ARE NOT ISSUES THAT WE CAN HAVE ANY COMPLIANCE ON THE
9:52:35PM SITE PLAN.
9:52:36PM AND AS I KNOW YOU KNOW, AND AS I KNOW MANY OTHER PEOPLE
9:52:40PM KNOW, IF IT'S NOT ON THE SITE PLAN AS AN OBLIGATION, YOU CAN
9:52:45PM GET RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PROCESS WHICH IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE
9:52:48PM PROCESS, AND IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING, AND THERE'S NOTHING
9:52:52PM TO GO AGAINST THE TERMS OF OBLIGATION.
9:52:54PM THE OTHER CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS BEING SUBJECTED TO BEING
9:52:59PM ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
9:53:02PM I AM NOT REALLY SURE HOW WE CAN BE TALKING ABOUT A PRIVATE
9:53:05PM EASEMENT THAT ISN'T SOMEHOW ACKNOWLEDGED WHERE IT WOULD GO
9:53:09PM ON THIS SITE PLAN.
9:53:10PM SO PART OF MY CONCERN IS IT SHOULDN'T THIS BE GOING BACK TO
9:53:17PM FIRST READING OR CONTINUED FOR THE PURPOSES OF HAVING A
9:53:19PM GREATER ANALYSIS OF THESE ISSUES.
9:53:21PM SO WE SHOULD BE GOING BACK TO FIRST READING FOR SOME OF THE
9:53:24PM THINGS THAT ARE COMING UP TODAY.
9:53:27PM WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME MANY YEARS AGO REWRITING IF PD
9:53:31PM PROCESS.
9:53:31PM THAT WAS THE POINT, THAT WAS THE PREMISE THAT HAPPENED ALL
9:53:35PM THE TIME AND EVERYBODY KNOWS WHO GOES FIRST AND WE KNOW WHAT
9:53:38PM IS GOING TO HAPPEN AT THE END OF THE DAY.
9:53:40PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:53:41PM WE AT LEAST KNOW.
9:53:43PM AND THAT'S MY PRESENTATION AND MANY OTHER FOLKS WANT TO COME
9:53:48PM UP.
9:53:49PM THANK YOU.
9:53:50PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
9:53:50PM NEXT, PLEASE.
9:53:51PM >> MY NAME IS RICHARD COLEY, A RESIDENT AT 2925 WEST GANDY,
9:53:57PM WHICH IS THE HAWTHORNE TOWNHOMES WHICH IS IMMEDIATELY
9:54:00PM ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
9:54:03PM AND I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT SINCE 1982 SOUTH OF GANDY.
9:54:07PM SO I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT'S
9:54:10PM OCCURRED.
9:54:12PM IN SHORT I AM ALSO THE PRESIDENT OF THE HOMEOWNERS
9:54:14PM ASSOCIATION.
9:54:15PM I HAVE A LETTER HERE, WHICH IS SIGNED BY THE MAJORITY OF OUR
9:54:17PM OWNERS IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.
9:54:22PM WE HAVE HAD BLUE LINE DEVELOPMENT HAS MET WITH OUR
9:54:25PM ASSOCIATION OWNERS.
9:54:26PM I AM JUST READING FROM IT.
9:54:27PM ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS.
9:54:30PM THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND NOW REDESIGNED PLANS RELATED TO
9:54:33PM APARTMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN.
9:54:38PM THEY COME TO US.
9:54:39PM THEY HAVE LISTENED TO US.
9:54:40PM THEY SPENT A COUPLE HOURS EACH TIME.
9:54:43PM AND THEY FULLY SATISFIED THE MAJORITY OF US.
9:54:46PM AND WE HAVE TWO OWNERS, ONE WHO IS ABSENTEE AND ONE -- THEY
9:54:54PM DIDN'T GET TO SIGN THIS THING.
9:54:55PM AND TWO, AND THE CLOSEST TO THE PARK THAT WERE CONCERNED
9:54:58PM ABOUT WHETHER THE BUILDING WAS GOING TO BLOCK THE SUN.
9:55:01PM I WENT AHEAD ON MAY 25th AND TOOK PICTURES FROM 3:30 IN
9:55:05PM THE AFTERNOON, 5:00, 6:00, 7:00, WHICH I WILL BE HAPPY TO
9:55:09PM PRESENT TO YOU.
9:55:09PM BUT YOU CAN SEE THE SUN IS WAY, WAY OVER EVEN THE EXISTING
9:55:13PM 30 OR 40-FOOT HIGH TREES, WHICH ARE GOING TO BE PRESERVED ON
9:55:17PM THE ZION EASEMENT.
9:55:19PM SO WE ARE VERY COMFORTABLE WITH THAT.
9:55:22PM IN THE OLD EXPRESSION OF "YOU CAN'T SEE THE FOREST FOR THE
9:55:25PM TREES" TYPE OF THING, HERE IS THE REAL ISSUE.
9:55:30PM WE HAVE GOT AN UNGODLY EYESORE THAT'S BEEN THERE FOR AS LONG
9:55:33PM AS I HAVE BEEN AROUND, AND IT'S ONLY GOTTEN WORSE.
9:55:36PM IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT UNREGULATED ZONING, TRAFFIC,
9:55:41PM MULTIPLE CARS, AND FERAL CATS AND RATS, THEN COME ON OVER.
9:55:47PM IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT EXTRA TRIPS BY THE TAMPA POLICE
9:55:49PM DEPARTMENT, COME ON OVER.
9:55:52PM YOU KNOW IT'S EMBARRASSING TO HAVE TO SAY, OH, JUST TURN
9:55:55PM AFTER THE TRAILER PARK.
9:55:57PM IT'S NOT A MOBILE HOME PARK.
9:55:58PM IT'S A TRAILER PARK
9:55:59PM AND, YOU KNOW, AS MUCH AS WE ALL HAVE CONCERNS, WHAT WE SEE
9:56:05PM IS A REAL VIABLE DEVELOPMENT.
9:56:08PM AND WE KNOW THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES.
9:56:10PM I UNDERSTAND ALL THE LEGALES ON WHAT CAN BE BUILT UNDER THE
9:56:13PM CURRENT ZONING.
9:56:14PM BUT IF YOU PUT AN OFFICE BUILDING THERE WITH HOW MANY TRIPS
9:56:18PM PER HOUR TURNOVER VERSUS WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE AND
9:56:22PM DISCUSSED UNDER TRANSPORTATION, FOR THE EXISTING PROJECT, WE
9:56:27PM ABSOLUTELY DEGREE THIS IS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE.
9:56:30PM WE FEEL THE DEVELOPER HAS BEEN COMPLETELY RESPONSIVE TO US.
9:56:34PM THE LAST -- TUESDAYS AND FRIDAY MORNINGS, WE HAVE GARBAGE
9:56:38PM TRUCKS COME IN.
9:56:38PM THEY HIT US AT ABOUT 7 A.M.
9:56:41PM THIS HIT HAWTHORNE.
9:56:42PM WE ALL HEAR THEM.
9:56:43PM SO AS FAR AS ANY ADDITIONAL NOISE STOPPING AT THIS
9:56:46PM PARTICULAR PROJECT, I DON'T SEE IT AS AN ISSUE.
9:56:49PM IT'S LIFE IN THE CITY.
9:56:50PM AND I'LL FINISH WITH THAT.
9:56:52PM THANK YOU.
9:56:52PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
9:56:53PM NEXT, PLEASE.
9:56:56PM >> MY NAME IS RUSSELL MATTHEWS, 2930 WEST HAWTHORNE ROAD.
9:57:00PM AND I LIVE NORTHEAST OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
9:57:04PM ALSO HAVE ACCESS ON THE ZION ROAD.
9:57:08PM AND GIVEN THE NUMBER OF PROFESSIONALS HERE, I HAVE DEVELOPED
9:57:13PM PROJECTS AND A REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL.
9:57:17PM I AM IN REAL ESTATE AND URBAN ANALYST AND SPENT TEN YEARS
9:57:22PM WORKING IN THE LAND USE OFFICE, AND A FORMER MOBILE HOME
9:57:27PM PARK OWNER, AND I AM APPRECIATIVE OF SOME OF THE COMMENTS
9:57:30PM FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND DINGFELDER.
9:57:35PM I AGREE WITH THOSE.
9:57:37PM BUT WHEN I INITIALLY FOUND OUT THE PROJECT WAS GOING TO BE
9:57:41PM BUILT I WAS PRETTY EXCITED.
9:57:43PM BUT ONCE I STARTED LOOKING AT THE DETAILS, I CAN'T SAY THAT
9:57:46PM I LIKE IT AT ALL.
9:57:48PM I MEAN, THE PROJECT IS BEING DEVELOPED EFFECTIVELY AS IF
9:57:52PM THERE WERE NO TREES AND IT WAS COMPLETELY CLEAR.
9:57:55PM I MEAN, THE PROPOSAL TO ME LOOKS LIKE JUST A RED HERON, AND
9:58:04PM THEN COME BACK WITH SOMETHING THAT'S OVER AND ABOVE WHAT
9:58:10PM WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPROVED.
9:58:11PM AND ONE OF THE INTERESTING THINGS I PICKED UP WAS THIS
9:58:13PM DISCUSSION OF INTENSITY.
9:58:15PM AND I THINK THAT THE REASON WHY THEY ARE GOING TO INTENSITY
9:58:19PM IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THIS VERY SMALL COMMERCIAL USE IN THERE
9:58:23PM AND THEY ARE STAYING AWAY FROM DENSITY BUT SIMPLY
9:58:26PM RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS, BECAUSE THEY ARE PROPOSING A VERY
9:58:30PM SIGNIFICANT INCREASE AND DENSITY OVER AND ABOVE WHAT WOULD
9:58:34PM BE ALLOWED UNDER THE ZONING, EUCLIDEAN ZONING OF CD.
9:58:44PM AND, YOU KNOW, HAVING ONE OFFICE REALLY DOES NOT MAKE A
9:58:49PM MIXED USE.
9:58:50PM I WISH YOU COULD SEE AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
9:58:53PM A GOOD ONE THAT SHOWED THAT THIS PROJECT, THIS PROPERTY IS
9:58:57PM COMPLETELY -- AND IT'S NOT JUST ORDINARY TREES.
9:59:01PM THESE ARE GRAND OAKS THAT ARE ALL THROUGHOUT, AND THEY ARE
9:59:07PM ALSO A SPECIAL KIND OF GROWTH.
9:59:09PM YOU HAVE TO HAVE ONES THAT GROW IN A SIDEWAYS DIRECTION AND
9:59:15PM THEY ARE FRANKLY IRREPLACEABLE.
9:59:17PM THESE ARE THE TYPES OF OAKS THAT WERE NATIVE TO THIS
9:59:20PM PARTICULAR PART OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA, PROBABLY OTHER PLACES,
9:59:24PM AND THERE ARE NOT MANY LEFT.
9:59:27PM AND THIS IS GOING TO BE A VERY SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION.
9:59:29PM [BELL SOUNDS]
9:59:31PM AND AS A PROFESSIONAL, AND SINCE ALL THE PARTIES WERE
9:59:36PM GRANTED EXTRA TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO --
9:59:43PM >>LUIS VIERA: GO FOR IT.
9:59:43PM >> THANKS.
9:59:45PM SO THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED PD, THAT'S BEEN MENTIONED
9:59:50PM SEVERAL TIMES.
9:59:52PM YOU KNOW, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A PD, SO WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
9:59:55PM SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN WHAT THEY PUT ON THE SITE IF THEY
9:59:59PM LEFT IT CG.
10:00:00PM AND IT'S HIGHLY INCONSISTENT WITH EVERY OTHER PROJECT IN
10:00:06PM THAT AREA OF GANDY AND SOUTH.
10:00:09PM IT'S MUCH HIGHER.
10:00:12PM BALCONY ISSUE IS A PROBLEM.
10:00:13PM IT'S FOUR STORIES PLUS A ROOFTOP FEATURE WITH YOUNG
10:00:17PM PROFESSIONALS, TO ME THAT OPENS A BAR ON THE ROOF, YOU KNOW.
10:00:22PM AND ALL THE BALCONIES, THAT TO ME IS UNACCEPTABLE.
10:00:26PM AS TO THE TRAFFIC ISSUE, THEY ARE STACKING ON BAYSHORE EVERY
10:00:34PM DAY, MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY, AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AN
10:00:39PM INCREASE IN DENSITY OVER WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED.
10:00:44PM THIS WOULD BE THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE, BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S,
10:00:50PM YOU KNOW, THIS IS GOING TO BE A PROBLEM.
10:00:55PM AGES 6 TO 16, I HAVE ALMOST BEEN RUN OVER MYSELF, I HAVE
10:00:58PM ALMOST SEEN MY CHILDREN GET RUN OVER A COUPLE OF TIMES.
10:01:01PM I DON'T WANT TO SEE ANY MORE TRAFFIC.
10:01:04PM I HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED, AND A GUY HAS GOTTEN OUT OF A CAR
10:01:07PM WHEN I TRIED TO TELL HIM TO SLOW DOWN.
10:01:09PM WE HAVE ALREADY GOT A BIG ENOUGH PROBLEM, AND ALSO ABSORBED
10:01:14PM INTENSITY AND DENSITY THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING ONLINE AS A
10:01:18PM RESULT OF SOME PROJECTS THAT HAVE COME UP.
10:01:22PM AND THE OTHER THING ON HAWTHORNE.
10:01:29PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:01:31PM WE HAVE TREES THAT LINE THE STREET AND IN A SIDEWALKS SO WE
10:01:33PM REALLY HAVE NOWHERE TO GO OTHER THAN ON THE STREETS SO WE
10:01:36PM WILL GET RUN OVER.
10:01:37PM AND THE STATEMENT THAT THEY CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING WITH THE
10:01:40PM WAYS THE TREES ARE CONFIGURED, WELL, I'M A DEVELOPER.
10:01:43PM I HAVE LAID OUT PLENTY OF SITE PLANS.
10:01:44PM AND THEY CAN'T DO IT WITH THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY, BUT
10:01:50PM THEY CAN PUT SOMETHING IN THERE.
10:01:51PM AND HAVING A MCDONALD OR SOME HIGH FENCE, IT'S A LITTLE
10:02:01PM RIDICULOUS.
10:02:02PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:02:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
10:02:06PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SIR?
10:02:10PM YOU FINISHED TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING THAT DOES CONCERN ME.
10:02:16PM I MEAN, DOESN'T CONCERN ME PERSONALLY, BUT IF I LIVED ON
10:02:21PM HAWTHORNE I MIGHT BE CONCERNED THAT THE CURRENT ZONING IS
10:02:25PM CG, WHICH BY A MATTER OF RIGHT COULD BE A MCDONALD OR SOME
10:02:33PM OTHER TYPE OF FAST FOOD USE, OR DRIVE-THROUGH, AND THAT'S
10:02:39PM THAT SORT OF THING.
10:02:41PM NUMBER ONE.
10:02:42PM SO I WOULD LIKE TO THE RESPONSE OF THE BUILDING PROFESSIONAL
10:02:46PM WHY YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.
10:02:47PM NUMBER ONE.
10:02:48PM NUMBER TWO IS, THEY PROVIDED SORT OF THIS BIG BOX SCENARIO,
10:02:58PM WHICH TO A CERTAIN EXTENT IS A REALITY IN TERMS OF A CG USE.
10:03:04PM UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAVE SEEN THEM BUILT POSSIBLY LIKE A
10:03:09PM STORAGE BUILDING, YOU KNOW, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY THEY BUILT
10:03:14PM ONE VERY CLOSE TO MY HOUSE, NOT VERY AESTHETICALLY PLEASING,
10:03:17PM AND PROBABLY 40, 45 FEET TALL, RIGHT UP TO NOT THE PROPERTY
10:03:25PM LOIN BUT THE BUILDING -- BUILDABLE LOT.
10:03:29PM SO ANYWAY, WHY DON'T THOSE TWO POTENTIAL SCENARIOS CONCERN
10:03:34PM YOU MORE?
10:03:35PM >> WELL, FOR THE URBAN ANALYSIS STANDPOINT, WE ARE TALKING
10:03:39PM ABOUT THE VERY EASTERN PART WHICH IS PREDOMINANTLY
10:03:43PM TOWNHOMES.
10:03:44PM THERE ARE SOME OTHER COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE SCATTERED.
10:03:48PM AND AS YOU GET FURTHER WEST, YES, YOU CAN GET INTO AREAS
10:03:52PM THAT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR, YOU KNOW, HIGHLY INTENSE USE LIKE
10:03:56PM THAT.
10:03:57PM BUT, YOU KNOW, REALISTICALLY --
10:04:03PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A 7-ELEVEN.
10:04:04PM >> THAT'S TRUE.
10:04:06PM AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A PROPERTY THAT'S VERY CLOSE TO
10:04:12PM BAYSHORE, VERY DESIRABLE, IT'S GOING TO BE VERY EXPENSIVE,
10:04:16PM AND THEY ARE GOING TO NEED A FAIR AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC TO
10:04:19PM SUPPORT THAT TYPE OF USE, OR YOU REALLY JUST DON'T HAVE THAT
10:04:23PM MUCH THROUGH TRAFFIC GOING THROUGH THERE, THE PEOPLE THAT
10:04:27PM ARE GOING TO STOP.
10:04:28PM WE DO HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC THAT COMES THROUGH BUT IT'S ALL
10:04:31PM TRANSIENT, MOSTLY PEOPLE TRYING TO AVOID THE TOLLS AND
10:04:36PM EXPRESSWAY, AND THEY BLAST THROUGH IN AND OUT, AND THEY
10:04:42PM STACK ON BOTH SIDE.
10:04:43PM WE CAN EITHER GET OUT OF OUR STREET NORTH, AND THEN WHEN WE
10:04:47PM ARE ON IT WE GET RUN OVER.
10:04:49PM AND I LITERALLY HAVE ALMOST BEEN RUN OVER ON ONE OCCASION TO
10:04:54PM THE POINT WHERE I HIT THE CAR.
10:05:06PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:05:07PM NEXT, PLEASE.
10:05:07PM >> GOOD EVENING, TAMPA CITY COUNCIL.
10:05:11PM THANK YOU FOR THE PRIVILEGE AND HONOR OF DOING YOUR PUBLIC
10:05:15PM SERVICE.
10:05:15PM WE ALL APPRECIATE IT.
10:05:16PM MY NAME IS LAURA HUMPHREY.
10:05:22PM I'M A LOCAL ATTORNEY HERE IN IF.
10:05:24PM BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY TONIGHT, THIS PROJECT IS SOMETHING THAT
10:05:30PM CAME TO US WHEN ACTUALLY ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS BROUGHT TO THE
10:05:33PM MY ATTENTION WHEN THE DEVELOPER WAS WALKING OUR STREET AND
10:05:36PM ASKING US WHAT WE THOUGHT ABOUT THIS PROJECT.
10:05:38PM AND AT FIRST GLANCE, IT SEEMS LIKE SOMETHING THAT WOULD
10:05:42PM BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY.
10:05:43PM NOW, I AM NOT A LAWYER THAT DOES LAND USE.
10:05:46PM I AM NOT SOMEONE THAT STUDIES DEVELOPMENT.
10:05:48PM I HAVE NEVER BEEN INVOLVED IN REAL ESTATE LAW.
10:05:50PM THAT'S NOT MY AREA OF EXPERTISE.
10:05:52PM BUT I HAVE LOOKED AT WHAT WAS DONE WITH THIS PROJECT AS FAR
10:05:56PM AS ANALYZING THE EVIDENCE THAT WE HAVE, AND I SEE SOME
10:05:59PM PROBLEMS.
10:05:59PM THE TWO PROBLEMS THAT I SEE THAT I AM MOST CONCERNED
10:06:03PM WESTBOUND IS, ONE, THE AMOUNT OF WAIVERS, AND TWO, THE
10:06:06PM DENSITY OF THIS PROJECT IS JUST COMPLETELY OVERKILL.
10:06:10PM NOW, AS YOU HEARD TODAY, THEY HAVE REQUESTED TEN WAIVERS.
10:06:15PM THAT WAS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT TO BE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT
10:06:20PM FOR A PROJECT OF THIS SIZE.
10:06:21PM AND AS I LOOK AT THE WAIVES AND LOOK AT HOW THE REPORT
10:06:28PM ALMOST, THEY WANT A WAIVER TO TAKE OFF 94% OF THE TREES,
10:06:32PM BECAUSE THEY NEED ROOM TO FIT THIS HUGE BOX BUILDING ON THIS
10:06:37PM 1.6 ACRES.
10:06:39PM THEY NEED A WAIVER TO MINIMIZE THE LANDSCAPING SO THAT IT
10:06:43PM MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY IN A WAY THAT IT'S STILL
10:06:47PM MAKING THE PROPERTY LOOK LIKE IT HAS SOME GREEN AREAS, BUT
10:06:49PM TRULY NOT MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY ARE TODAY.
10:06:55PM THE WAIVERS ARE TOO FAR IN MY MIND.
10:07:01PM IT'S AN OVERSCALED PROJECT ON UNDERSIZED LAND.
10:07:05PM AND I THINK THE STAFF REPORT AND THE WAY THAT THE WAIVERS
10:07:07PM ARE LAID OUT SHOWS THAT.
10:07:08PM AND I THINK THAT THE ARBORIST HERE TODAY THAT SAID THAT THEY
10:07:13PM ARE INCONSISTENT WITH REMOVAL OF THESE TREES ARE ALSO GIVING
10:07:16PM THAT OPINION, BUT IT'S TAKING IT TOO FAR.
10:07:19PM BUT I WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THE SECOND ISSUE AND THAT IS
10:07:23PM THE ZONING.
10:07:23PM AND THAT'S IMPORTANT TO YOU ALL BECAUSE FROM MY
10:07:25PM UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW, AND THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL
10:07:29PM HEARING, YOU ALL GET TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS WILL BE DONE
10:07:31PM AS A MIXED USE PROPERTY.
10:07:33PM AND THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT.
10:07:35PM BUT IF THIS IS CHANGED TO MIXED USE AND COMMERCIAL AND
10:07:38PM RESIDENTIAL, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BUILD 80 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
10:07:42PM ON 1.6 ACRES.
10:07:43PM THAT'S EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN IF IT WAS ZONED RESIDENTIAL.
10:07:48PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:07:49PM I KNOW IT WAS BROUGHT UP TODAY THAT THEY HAVE 600, 700
10:07:54PM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF OFFICE SPACE, AND THAT MAKES THIS
10:07:56PM RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AT THE SAME TIME.
10:07:59PM THIS IS A 96,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY.
10:08:02PM THAT'S LESS THAN 1% OF THE PROPERTIES USED FOR OFFICES.
10:08:08PM AND THAT'S WHAT'S MAKING THIS 80 UNITS RESIDENTIAL AND
10:08:13PM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX.
10:08:14PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:08:17PM >>LUIS VIERA: OF IF YOU NEED ANOTHER MINUTE OR TWO?
10:08:20PM >> I THINK A MINUTE WOULD DO IT.
10:08:22PM I HAVE A COUPLE OF STATEMENTS WRITTEN DOWN THAT WERE SAID
10:08:24PM TODAY.
10:08:25PM I NEED TO LOOK AT THEM TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE CLEAR FOR THE
10:08:28PM RECORD.
10:08:32PM ONE OF THE STATEMENTS TODAY WAS THAT THIS IS A BOUTIQUE
10:08:36PM APARTMENT BUILDING.
10:08:37PM THAT'S FAR FROM THE TRUTH.
10:08:38PM AND I THINK THE EVIDENCE IN THE STAFF REPORT AS TO HOW THE
10:08:41PM CHANGE IN THE DESIGNATION OF THIS PROPERTY MAKES IT SO THIS
10:08:45PM IS OVERBUILD, AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO LOOK AT THE
10:08:50PM ANALYSIS IN IT.
10:08:53PM THIS IS A CAREFUL INTENSIFICATION.
10:08:57PM I THINK MR. DINGFELDER -- I APOLOGIZE.
10:09:03PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEY HAVE BEEN DOING IT ALL DAY.
10:09:05PM [ LAUGHTER ]
10:09:06PM >> BUT CAREFUL INTENSIFICATION OF THIS PROJECT IS NOT
10:09:12PM INDICATIVE OF THE LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE BUT THE RESIDENCY OF
10:09:19PM THE, AND WE FOUND IF IT WAS COMMERCIAL IT WOULD BE HIGHER.
10:09:25PM THESE BALCONIES -- THESE ARE BACKYARDS WHERE THERE ARE
10:09:30PM BARBECUES, POOL PARTIES, PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HAVE THEIR
10:09:33PM REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY UNDER THE LAW.
10:09:35PM AND IF THAT WAS SOME SORT OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, YOU WOULDN'T
10:09:38PM HAVE PEOPLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THEIR BALCONIES LOOKING OUT
10:09:42PM ONTO THIS RESIDENTIAL AREA.
10:09:43PM AND I UNDERSTAND THEY ARE TRYING TO BUFFER THAT WITH THE
10:09:45PM TREES.
10:09:46PM BUT HONESTLY, I HEARD DEVIATIONS TODAY THAT GO AGAINST WHAT
10:09:51PM THE EVIDENCE HAS SAID AND WHAT I HAVE SEEN.
10:09:52PM AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PROVIDE FOR,
10:09:56PM BUT I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD RELY ON JUST THE STATEMENT TODAY
10:09:59PM THAT THINGS HAVE CHANGED, AND WE ALREADY HAVE PLANS.
10:10:04PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:10:05PM THERE'S A LEGITIMATE USE FOR THE OFFICE.
10:10:08PM THE FACT THAT THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP SHOWS THIS IS AN
10:10:10PM ISSUE.
10:10:11PM THIS IS GOING S GOING TO BE A MIXED USE OFFICE AND
10:10:14PM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, 1% IS NOT ENOUGH.
10:10:17PM THE CITY ACCESS, THE PARKING SPACES CAN BE USED.
10:10:25PM THIS GOES COMPLETELY TO THE WAIVER OF THE PARKING.
10:10:27PM AND I KNOW I AM RUNNING OUT OF TIME SOAP I WANT TO SAY JUST
10:10:31PM A SECOND, THEY HAVE ASKED FOR A WAIVER OF PARKING.
10:10:35PM THEY ASKED FOR A WAIVER OF PARKING FOR THIS COMPLEX.
10:10:38PM WHERE ARE ALL THE RESIDENTS GOING TO PARK?
10:10:40PM THEY ARE GOING TO PARK ON HAWTHORNE.
10:10:42PM AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO PARK AT THE 7-ELEVEN.
10:10:45PM THEY ARE GOING TO PARK AT THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT ARE ON
10:10:47PM THE SIDE OF THE STREET.
10:10:48PM AND ALLOWING THEM TO HAVE LESS PARKING SPOTS AND THEN GIVING
10:10:54PM THEM THE WAIVER THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A LOADING AREA AND NOW
10:10:57PM THEY ARE USING THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES TO BE
10:11:00PM LOAD THE 80 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THERE ARE GOING
10:11:06PM TO BE ISSUES.
10:11:07PM >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY.
10:11:08PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:11:09PM AND FIVE SECONDS TO FINISH UP.
10:11:11PM >> YES.
10:11:13PM AS A TAMPA NATIVE AND SOMEONE THAT'S, I APPRECIATE ALL YOU
10:11:17PM DO AND I THINK THAT OUR CITY HAS A GREAT POTENTIAL FOR
10:11:22PM GROWTH, BUT I THINK THAT COMES WITH SOME RESPONSIBILITY.
10:11:26PM I JUST ASK THAT THE EVIDENCE BE LOOKED AT AND CONSIDERED.
10:11:29PM IF ANYONE HAS A QUESTION I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
10:11:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY QUESTIONS?
10:11:41PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
10:11:41PM AFTER THIS NEXT COMMENT WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE
10:11:43PM RECESS BECAUSE THE GOOD FOLKS AT CTTV NEED FIVE MINUTES.
10:11:49PM GO AHEAD.
10:11:49PM >> LEWIS KEY, 4010 WEST HAWTHORNE ROAD.
10:11:56PM IT'S RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE PICTURE WITH THE POOL IN THE
10:12:01PM BACKYARD.
10:12:02PM I LIVED THERE FOUR YEARS.
10:12:03PM MY WIFE AND I MOVED SOUTH OF ZION AVENUE FOUR BLOCKS NORTH
10:12:08PM BECAUSE WE WANTED A NICER HOUSE AND ONE OF MY MAIN
10:12:12PM PRIORITIES WAS PRIVACY.
10:12:13PM WHEN I LOOKED AT THAT HOUSE AND WENT IN THE BACKYARD AND I
10:12:16PM LOOKED AT MY BACKYARD, I HAVE A 8-FOOT WALL BACK THERE, AND
10:12:19PM I LOOKED BACK UP, ALL I SEE IS OAK TREES EVERYWHERE. IT'S
10:12:23PM LIKE A FOREST THAT I LOOKED INTO.
10:12:25PM AND I THOUGHT, THAT'S GREAT.
10:12:26PM SO WE AGREED TO BUY THE HOUSE.
10:12:28PM AND IF THIS PROJECT GOES THROUGH, WHEN I WALK IN THE
10:12:32PM BACKYARD AND I LOOK, I WILL SEE NO TREES AT ALL, THE HUGE
10:12:38PM OAK TREE THAT WAS ONE OF THE GOOD OL' OAK TREES IS RIGHT
10:12:42PM BEHIND, I LOOK RIGHT AT THAT.
10:12:44PM SO ALL I AM GOING TO SEE IS A FOUR STORY BUILDING SITTING
10:12:47PM THERE LOOKING OVER INTO MY BACKYARD.
10:12:49PM AND YOU WON'T JUST BE LOOKING IN MY BACKYARD.
10:12:52PM UNFORTUNATELY YOU WILL BE LOOKING RIGHT INTO MY HOUSE.
10:12:54PM BECAUSE WE HAVE -- THAT'S WHERE OUR TV IS, THAT'S WHERE WE
10:13:01PM SPEND OUR TIME EVERY NIGHT AND WE HAVE OUR LIGHTS ON.
10:13:04PM I AM GOING TO BE IN THERE.
10:13:05PM AND ANYBODY IN THOSE APARTMENTS, AND YES, THEY DO HAVE
10:13:08PM BALCONIES BECAUSE I ALREADY ASKED THEM ABOUT THAT, AND
10:13:13PM PEOPLE WILL LOOK RIGHT INTO OUR HOUSE AND SEE WHAT WE ARE
10:13:16PM DOING.
10:13:16PM I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT BEING IN YOUR HOUSE WITH
10:13:20PM PEOPLE WATCHING YOU AT ANY GIVEN TIME WHEN YOU ARE DOING
10:13:24PM SOMETHING.
10:13:25PM IN RELATION TO THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR, THE GENTLEMAN
10:13:28PM MENTIONED AND THEY SHOWED PICTURES OF THAT BECAUSE THEY
10:13:31PM THOUGHT, HIS STATEMENT IS WHOLLY INCORRECT.
10:13:37PM THAT CANOPY DOES NOT BLOCK YOUR VIEW LOOKING OVER AT ALL.
10:13:40PM I HAVE BEEN IN THEIR BACKYARD.
10:13:42PM I HAVE BEEN IN MY BACKYARD.
10:13:43PM YOU CAN SEE RIGHT THROUGH THOSE TREES.
10:13:45PM THAT BUILDING VERY EASILY, UNLESS THEY PUT IN TREES THERE OR
10:13:50PM UNLESS THEY PUT A LOT OF TREES ON THE OTHER SIDE TO BLOCK
10:13:52PM THE VIEW, WE ARE GOING TO SEE THAT BUILDING.
10:13:54PM IT'S GOING TO BE HANGING OVER US AND WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A
10:13:58PM VIEW OF PEOPLE AND THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE A VIEW OF US.
10:14:01PM I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM WITH THAT.
10:14:02PM THE OTHER ISSUES, I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE YOUR TIME, BUT WE
10:14:08PM SENT TONS OF LETTERS.
10:14:10PM I ASSUME YOU HAVE READ ALL OF THEM AND KNOW THE ISSUES AND
10:14:13PM THE TRAFFIC.
10:14:13PM I JUST FEEL THIS PROPERTY, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PUT TOO BIG
10:14:17PM OF A PROPERTY ON TOO SMALL A PIECE OF LAND AND THEY NEED TO
10:14:19PM FIND A BIGGER PIECE OF LAND TO PUT THAT PROPERTY ON.
10:14:22PM AND IN RELATION TO COMPARING US WITH THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
10:14:26PM ISSUE, IT'S THIS OR IT'S THAT, YOU ARE GOING TO LOOK AT 30
10:14:31PM OR 40 FEET BUILDINGS OR 60 OR 70-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING, I
10:14:36PM DON'T CARE.
10:14:37PM RIGHT NOW WE ARE DEALING WITH. THIS I AM NOT GOING TO WORRY
10:14:39PM ABOUT THAT UNTIL THAT SITUATION COMES UP IF IT DOES.
10:14:42PM AND IT MAY COME UP BETTER.
10:14:45PM I WOULD RATHER HAVE A BUILDING WITH NO WINDOWS IN THE BACK
10:14:47PM THERE THAN I WOULD AN APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE LOOKING AT.
10:14:50PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:14:55PM THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
10:14:56PM >>LUIS VIERA: CITY COUNCIL WILL STAND IN RECESS FOR ANOTHER
10:14:58PM FIVE MINUTES WHILE CTTV NEEDS TO MAKE CHANGES.
10:15:02PM THANK YOU.
10:15:02PM WE WILL BE BACK.
10:15:03PM [COUNCIL RECESS]
10:28:10PM [SOUNDING GAVEL]
10:28:11PM >>LUIS VIERA: TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IS BACK IN SESSION.
10:28:13PM ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
10:28:13PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
10:28:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
10:28:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
10:28:20PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
10:28:22PM >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
10:28:23PM >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
10:28:24PM OKAY.
10:28:25PM LET'S BEGIN.
10:28:26PM GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
10:28:30PM PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
10:28:30PM >> THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU THIS
10:28:32PM EVENING.
10:28:33PM MY NAME IS BARBARA BACHMANN.
10:28:35PM I AM A RESIDENT AT 3000 WEST HAWTHORNE ROAD WHICH IS
10:28:38PM PROPERTY THAT DIRECTLY IS BEHIND THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
10:28:42PM MY HUSBAND AND I HAD BOUGHT OUR FIRST HOME IN 1984 SO AGAIN
10:28:47PM A RESIDENT THERE FOR 35 YEARS.
10:28:50PM MY LATE HUSBAND AND I BUILT THE HOUSE AT 3000 HAWTHORNE ROAD
10:28:54PM BECAUSE WE LOVE THE CANOPY FOR THE TREES.
10:28:57PM HAWTHORNE IS A VERY UNIQUE STREET BECAUSE THE CANOPY OF THE
10:29:01PM TREES GOES TO THE CURVE SO THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS.
10:29:04PM THERE'S A FEW SIDEWALKS WHERE PEOPLE PUT UP IN FRONT OF
10:29:07PM THEIR HOUSES.
10:29:08PM BUT THE MAJORITY OF THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON THE STREET,
10:29:12PM WHICH IS A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH STROLLERS, PARENTS
10:29:15PM WALKING THEIR CHILDREN, KIDS ON BIKES, ARE ACCESSING
10:29:19PM BAYSHORE ON THE STREET.
10:29:22PM ONE OF MY CONCERNS, ONE OF OUR LARGEST CONCERNS AS A
10:29:25PM PHYSICIAN IN THE COMMUNITY IS THE LACK OF SAFETY THAT THIS
10:29:29PM CAN PRESENT WITH ONE OF THE MOST NARROW STREETS IN SOUTH
10:29:32PM TAMPA WITH NO SIDEWALKS.
10:29:39PM AND ALSO THE LACK OF PARKING REQUIREMENT.
10:29:41PM I THINK THEY CALCULATED 1.2 CARS PER UNIT IN THEIR CURRENT
10:29:44PM CAN RECOMMENDATIONS.
10:29:46PM WE KNOW THIS IS GOING TO BE A RENTAL UNIT.
10:29:48PM IT'S GOING TO BE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS.
10:29:50PM THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE 1.2 CARS FOR EACH OF THESE UNITS.
10:29:53PM THERE'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE TWO.
10:29:54PM THERE'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE.
10:29:57PM THERE ARE PEOPLE HAVING PARTIES AND HAVING GUESTS OVER
10:29:59PM BECAUSE THAT'S THE NATURE OF WHAT THIS UNIT IS GOING TO
10:30:02PM PROVIDE.
10:30:03PM WHERE IS THAT PARKING GOING TO BE?
10:30:04PM IT'S GOING TO BE AROUND THE CORNER ON HAWTHORNE UP AND DOWN
10:30:10PM BE EITHER 2900, 3,000, THE 3100 BLOCK OF HAWTHORNE ALL OF
10:30:14PM WHICH ARE NARROW STREETS WITH NO SIDEWALKS WITH HEAVY
10:30:17PM PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.
10:30:19PM I ENCOURAGE EACH OF YOU TO GO BEHIND YOGURTOLOGY.
10:30:27PM IT'S EXTREMELY NARROW. THERE'S A RETENTION POND BEHIND
10:30:33PM YOGURTOLOGY.
10:30:37PM IT'S BARELY ENOUGH FOR ONE CAR.
10:30:39PM THE EGRESS IS GOING TO BE AT LEAST 140 CARS IF THEY GET
10:30:42PM THEIR CURRENT DENSITY.
10:30:43PM I THINK THE SALIENT FACT OF THIS PROJECT IS THAT IT'S TOO
10:30:47PM BIG FOR TOO LITTLE A PIECE OF LAND.
10:30:49PM AND I WOULD AGREE TO HAVE ALL OF THESE WAIVERS AND ALL OF
10:30:52PM THESE THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO MEET THE
10:30:54PM REQUIREMENTS IMPLIES THAT THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT DEVELOPMENT
10:30:58PM FOR THIS SPACE.
10:30:59PM AND I REALLY APPEAL TO THE COMMISSION TO LOOK AT THIS AS
10:31:05PM BEING AN INAPPROPRIATE USE, THE TERM DISRUPTIVE TO
10:31:10PM NEIGHBORHOOD IS USED FREQUENTLY IN THESE PREVIOUS ZONING
10:31:13PM REQUIREMENTS.
10:31:13PM THIS IS GOING TO BE HIGHLY DISRUPTIVE TO THE ADJACENT
10:31:16PM PROPERTY.
10:31:17PM AND I THINK IT'S AN INAPPROPRIATE ZONING USE AND WAIVERS FOR
10:31:21PM THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT.
10:31:22PM THANK YOU.
10:31:24PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM.
10:31:24PM NEXT, PLEASE, SIR.
10:31:25PM >> ANDRES PRIDA, 4003 SOUTH HAWTHORNE ROAD.
10:31:35PM ME AND MY WIFE LIVED THERE SINCE 2003.
10:31:37PM WE HAVE A SMALL CHILD, A TEENAGER NOW.
10:31:39PM THE TRAFFIC IS A PROBLEM ON HAWTHORNE.
10:31:43PM MY NEIGHBOR BARBARA SAID, THERE HASN'T BEEN MUCH TALK ABOUT
10:31:48PM THE PARKING WAIVER BUT THERE'S GOING TO BE 80 UNITS.
10:31:50PM THE QUESTION IS WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PARK?
10:31:52PM THERE'S NO ON STREET PARKING.
10:31:56PM YOU A THORN ROAD IS VERY NARROW. OFF NARROW ALLEY.
10:32:00PM THERE'S GOING TO BE AT LEAST TWO CARS PER UNIT IF NOT MORE.
10:32:05PM HE KEPT CALLING THIS PROJECT A MIXED USE PROJECT.
10:32:08PM LESS THAN 1% OF THE LEASABLE SQUARE FOOT IS GOING TO BE
10:32:13PM COMMERCIAL SPACE.
10:32:15PM THAT'S NOT MEETING THE SPIRIT OF THE CITY CODE, THE
10:32:18PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
10:32:23PM THEY CONSTANTLY ARE ASKING FOR WAIVERS REGARDING
10:32:26PM LANDSCAPING, YOU KNOW, THE SCALE AND THE MASS OF THIS
10:32:30PM PROJECT IS HUGE.
10:32:33PM WE ARE GOING TO HAVE BALCONIES IN OUR BACKYARD. THIS
10:32:35PM PROPERTY IS DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH OF ME ON THE PROPERTY.
10:32:38PM THE GRAND OAKS, YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE CANOPY THAT'S GOING TO
10:32:41PM BE IRREPLACEABLE.
10:32:43PM THEY ARE ASKING TO PAY INTO THE FUND WHICH DOESN'T BENEFIT
10:32:45PM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH IS AWESOME TREES AND CANOPY.
10:32:49PM DRIVE DOWN HAWTHORNE ROAD.
10:32:52PM WHEN WE MET WITH THE DEVELOPER, THEY WANT TO SCARE US.
10:32:57PM WITH MCDONALD, YOU KNOW?
10:32:59PM IT'S NOT HOW MANY BALCONIES OR VILLAGE INN.
10:33:04PM THEY USE A SQUARE TACTIC EVERY TIME WE MET WITH THEM.
10:33:07PM WE ARE DEALING WITH BE THIS PROJECT, THESE WAIVERS, YOU
10:33:09PM KNOW, AT THIS TIME.
10:33:16PM AND THE USE OF THE ALLEY AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, NO ONE KNOWS.
10:33:20PM I THINK THE DRAWINGS WE HAVE SEEN, HOW DOES THE SECOND FLOOR
10:33:25PM PARKING DECK ACCESS. TO BE ME FROM THE PLAN IT LOOKS LIKE
10:33:28PM IT'S GOING TO BE FROM THE ALLEY. YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE 70
10:33:31PM TRIPS UP AND DOWN THERE EVERY MORNING.
10:33:33PM HAWTHORNE STACKS UP.
10:33:34PM THEIR TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT MENTIONED 4 TO 6 P.M., BUT
10:33:39PM LOOK AT 7 TO 9 WHEN WE ARE ALL TAKING OUR KIDS TO SCHOOL AND
10:33:42PM GOING TO WORK.
10:33:43PM MacDILL BACKS UP, YOU KNOW.
10:33:47PM YOU KNOW, THAT'S A CONCERN.
10:33:48PM YOU KNOW, THEY DIDN'T LOOK AT THAT.
10:33:52PM ANOTHER CONCERN FOR ME IS THE ROOFTOP DECK.
10:33:54PM WHAT KIND OF NOISE, WHAT KIND OF RESTRICTIONS ARE YOU GOING
10:33:57PM TO HAVE ON THIS SPACE?
10:33:59PM THEY ARE GOING TO BE UP THERE ALL NIGHT MAKING NOISE?
10:34:01PM WE HAVE CHILDREN.
10:34:03PM WE HAVE SCHOOL.
10:34:04PM I THINK THE TYPE OF PROPERTY AND THE POTENTIAL TENANTS IT'S
10:34:12PM GOING TO BE ALLOWED ATMOSPHERE AND VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE
10:34:15PM ROOFTOP DECK, AND THE NOISE THAT'S GOING TO POTENTIALLY
10:34:20PM TRAVEL TO MY BACKYARD.
10:34:22PM THANK YOU.
10:34:22PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR.
10:34:26PM MA'AM.
10:34:26PM >> CAROL GUYTON, 3015 HAWTHORNE ROAD.
10:34:42PM I HAVE COME WITH A MESSAGE, THINGS THAT I WAS GOING TO SAY.
10:34:49PM I JUST POSE MORE QUESTIONS.
10:34:50PM SO I HAVE MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS.
10:34:54PM OR THOUGHTS ABOUT IN THAT, THEY CAME TO OUR MEETING AND TOLD
10:35:00PM US CERTAIN THINGS, AND TONIGHT I HEAR OTHER THINGS.
10:35:04PM AND SO I REALLY WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING?
10:35:09PM I DON'T FEEL THAT WE HAVE THE TRUTH, BECAUSE THEY TOLD US
10:35:13PM ONE THING WHEN WE MET WITH THEM, AND ANOTHER TONIGHT.
10:35:17PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
10:35:21PM >> JUST FOR THE RECORD, I REFRAINED.
10:35:29PM I NEVER MESSED WITH YOUR WATERMELONS.
10:35:32PM IT'S AN INSIDE JOKE.
10:35:34PM >> THANK YOU, MR. CITRO.
10:35:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, CHAIR.
10:35:44PM >>LUIS VIERA: REBUTTAL?
10:35:45PM OH, I'M SORRY.
10:35:46PM GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
10:35:47PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
10:35:49PM THERE ARE A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION ON
10:35:51PM THE RECORD, JUST BASED ON TESTIMONY THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED.
10:35:55PM SO ONE IS THE APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AND THE SITE PLAN
10:35:59PM AND APPLICATION BE HAS BEEN REVIEWED UNDER THE OLD TREE
10:36:02PM CODE.
10:36:03PM IT WAS NOT REVIEWED UNDER THE NEW TREE CODE.
10:36:07PM THE OTHER ITEM OF CONCERN THAT I WOULD JUST LIKE TO CLARIFY,
10:36:11PM THE REDESIGN OF THE ALLEY WAS REVIEWED BY ONE DEPARTMENT,
10:36:17PM TRANSPORTATION.
10:36:18PM IT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY OTHER DEPARTMENT, NOT SOLID
10:36:22PM WASTE, NO OTHER DEPARTMENT HAS HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW IT.
10:36:26PM I WOULD LIKE TO GET THAT ON THE RECORD.
10:36:28PM THE OTHER ITEM IS THE LOADING SPACE TO THE NORTH OF THE
10:36:33PM SITE.
10:36:34PM SO IF IT IS COUNCIL'S DIRECTION TO HAVE THE LOADING SPACE
10:36:37PM PLACED BACK ON THE SITE, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE TRANSPORTATION
10:36:41PM STAFF HERE, AND HE CAN PROVIDE TESTIMONY AS TO WHY THE
10:36:45PM LOADING SPACE HAD TO BE REMOVED IN THE BEGINNING.
10:36:48PM >>LUIS VIERA: DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
10:36:53PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
10:36:54PM [NO ENCODER]
10:37:31PM [NO ENCODER]
10:37:31PM >> THEY ARE TECHNICALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE LOADING SPACE.
10:37:35PM THAT'S WHY WE TOOK THAT OFF THE SITE PLAN.
10:37:39PM TO MEET THE TAMPA CODE REQUIREMENTS IS THE REASON WE
10:37:43PM COULDN'T PUT THAT ON.
10:37:43PM BUT WE STILL HAVE TO ADDRESS THE BALANCE, AND THAT IS
10:37:47PM SOMETHING THAT WE'LL HAVE TO DO.
10:37:51PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ISN'T THAT WHAT A SITE PLAN IS FOR?
10:37:54PM >> IT'S SOMETHING WE HAVE TO ADDRESS.
10:37:56PM OUR CODE DOESN'T REQUIRE THEM TO HAVE LOADING SPACE SINCE
10:38:00PM THESE LESS THAN 100,000 SQUARE FEET.
10:38:02PM BUT THEY STILL HAVE TO ADDRESS ...
10:38:14PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE DON'T REQUIRE IT BUT THEY STILL NEED
10:38:16PM TO SHOW IT.
10:38:17PM I AM TRYING TO JOG THOSE TWO.
10:38:19PM >> THEY STILL HAVE TO ADDRESS THEM.
10:38:21PM WE ASKED THEM TO TAKE OFF THAT LOADING SPACE OFF THE ALLEY
10:38:25PM SINCE THEY DIDN'T MEET THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS.
10:38:27PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO IF WE ARE GOING TO TAKE IT OFF THE
10:38:29PM ALLEY, WHERE ARE WE PUTTING IT?
10:38:33PM >> BY OUR CODE THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A LOADING
10:38:35PM SPACE.
10:38:38PM THEY STILL HAVE TO ADDRESS THE SUPPORTS.
10:38:42PM BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO SHOW A LOADING SPACE ON THEIR SITE
10:38:45PM PLAN.
10:38:46PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
10:38:50PM IF I MAY.
10:38:52PM THE APPLICANT HAD A LOADING SPACE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE
10:38:54PM PLAN.
10:38:55PM DID IT NOT MEET TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL STANDARDS IN
10:39:00PM MANEUVERING.
10:39:00PM SO THEY WERE REQUESTED TO REMOVE IT FROM THE SITE PLAN.
10:39:04PM IF THE REQUEST TONIGHT IS TO PUT THE LOADING SPACE BACK ON,
10:39:07PM THEY HAVE TO SHOW HOW THAT STANDARD CAN BE MET.
10:39:10PM AT LAST SUBMITTAL, IT SHOULD BE REMOVED, OFF THE SITE PLAN.
10:39:14PM THAT'S WHAT WAS REQUESTED.
10:39:17PM WITH TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT MEET THAT
10:39:19PM STANDARD.
10:39:19PM AND WHAT HE'S ASKING FOR IS CAN IT SHOW PROOF THAT IT WILL
10:39:22PM FUNCTION?
10:39:26PM INSTEAD OF IDENTIFYING ON THE PLAN THE DIMENSIONS.
10:39:31PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT IF THIS COUNCILMAN DEMANDS SOMETHING
10:39:35PM THAT THE CODE DOESN'T ALLOW ME TO DEMAND, THEN MRS. KERT IS
10:39:40PM GOING TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT.
10:39:42PM >>LACHONE DOCK: THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD NOT REVISE
10:39:45PM THE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, IT WOULD NEED TO
10:39:47PM HAVE FURTHER REVIEW FROM STAFF.
10:39:49PM >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
10:39:59PM NO.
10:40:04PM I THINK WHAT I HEAR MRS. DOCK SAYING IS THE CONCERN OF THIS
10:40:09PM BUILDING REQUIRING -- IT DOESN'T TECHNICALLY REQUIRE A
10:40:13PM LOADING SPACE.
10:40:14PM HOWEVER, THERE'S AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THE ISSUE THAT YOU
10:40:19PM RAISED COULD HAVE AN IMPACT ON JOINING PROPERTIES IF IT
10:40:23PM WASN'T SOMEHOW SHOWN THAT THEY WERE ADDRESSING IN THE SOME
10:40:25PM WAY.
10:40:26PM BUT THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO SHOW A LOADING SPACE, BUT MAYBE
10:40:29PM THEY COULD EXPLAIN HOW THE SITUATION IN THE REBUTTAL THEY
10:40:34PM COULD ADDRESS HOW THEY EXPECT THE SITUATION TO BE ADDRESSED
10:40:37PM WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT THEY HAVE, SEE IF THAT ADDRESSES THE
10:40:40PM CONCERN.
10:40:42PM REBECCA KERT, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
10:40:43PM I DO HAVE ONE OTHER CLARIFICATION THAT I JUST WANTED TO
10:40:46PM MAKE.
10:40:46PM THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ALLEY AND RESUBMITTING
10:40:48PM THEIR CONFIGURATION, WHETHER OR NOT THAT NEEDED TO BE
10:40:51PM REVIEWED BY ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENTS.
10:40:52PM THE REVISION SHEET THAT STAFF SUBMITTED TO YOU HAS A
10:40:57PM STATEMENT THAT ALL ACTIVITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL HAVE TO
10:41:00PM GO THROUGH DEVELOPMENTAL PERMITTING PROCESS.
10:41:03PM THAT'S HOW THE PERMIT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, DON'T PERMIT IT
10:41:06PM IN YOUR REZONING PROCESS SO THAT WOULD BE THE APPROPRIATE
10:41:09PM PROCESS.
10:41:09PM THE REASON EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT THE ALLEY IS BECAUSE
10:41:12PM THERE WERE SOME TREES IN THE ALLEY.
10:41:16PM THE TREE TABLE THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO YOU FOR REVIEW
10:41:20PM DOES NOT SHOW THE ALLEY TREES BEING REMOVED.
10:41:24PM SO I AM NOT TESTIFYING.
10:41:26PM THAT'S IN THE RECORD.
10:41:27PM I AM JUST REITERATING.
10:41:28PM THAT FOR THE DEVELOPER TO REMOVE THOSE TREES, THEY WOULD
10:41:31PM HAVE TO BE SHOWN ON THE TREE TABLE.
10:41:32PM SO THOSE TREES ARE ALREADY REQUIRED TO BE SAVED.
10:41:34PM I DO WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THEY ARE RIGHT-OF-WAY TREES, AND
10:41:40PM THE DEVELOPER UNDER THIS SITE PLAN HAS SHOWN DOES NOT HAVE
10:41:43PM THE ABILITY TO REMOVE THEM.
10:41:45PM THERE'S NOT A GUARANTEE THAT AT SOME POINT NATURAL RESOURCES
10:41:47PM OR WHOEVER IS ALLOWED TO UNDER OUR NEW TREE CODE REMOVE
10:41:51PM THEM.
10:41:51PM THEY COULD POTENTIALLY BE REMOVED IN THE FUTURE, BUT THIS
10:41:55PM SITE PLAN DOES NOT ALLOW THE DEVELOPER TO REMOVE THE TREES.
10:41:59PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
10:42:02PM IF I MAY, COUNCILMAN CARLSON, DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION, SIR?
10:42:06PM OKAY, THANK YOU.
10:42:07PM MR. SHELBY?
10:42:07PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. BENTLEY, ARE YOU GOING TO GO ABOUT
10:42:12PM REBUTTAL NOW?
10:42:13PM >>MARK BENTLEY: WITH THE CHAIR'S PERMISSION, SURE.
10:42:16PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WAS WONDERING, YOU AND I HAD A
10:42:20PM DISCUSSION ABOUT ITEMS US WANTED SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD.
10:42:23PM WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO THAT?
10:42:25PM ALL THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED?
10:42:28PM >>MARK BENTLEY: SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS ARE ALREADY IN THE
10:42:31PM RECORD, IN THE FILE FOR THIS APPLICATION.
10:42:37PM AND SOME OF THE RESUMÉS, ET CETERA.
10:42:39PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THIS ALL BASED THEN ON THE TESTIMONY?
10:42:43PM THERE ARE NO EXPERTS IN HERE THAT HAVE NOT TESTIFIED.
10:42:46PM >>MARK BENTLEY: THAT'S CORRECT.
10:42:48PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
10:42:53PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY
10:42:54PM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SECOND BY MR. CITRO.
10:42:59PM ALL IN FAVOR?
10:42:59PM OPPOSED?
10:43:00PM AND MR. GUDES HAS A QUESTION.
10:43:04PM MS. KERT, PLEASE.
10:43:05PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE THIS DOWN PAT.
10:43:13PM WE HAVE A TREE CODE THAT PETITIONER ORIGINALLY FELL UNDER.
10:43:19PM NOW WE HAVE A NEW TREE CODE.
10:43:22PM HOW IS THAT GOING TO INTERTWINE WITH THAT NOW?
10:43:25PM >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
10:43:26PM IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN THE APPLICANT CAME IN, HE
10:43:30PM WAS UNDER THE OLD TREE CODE.
10:43:31PM SO IT WAS REVIEWED UNDER THE OLD TREE CODE.
10:43:35PM I BROUGHT THAT UP, STAFF CLARIFIED THAT BECAUSE THERE WAS
10:43:40PM SOME DISCUSSION FROM THE PETITIONERS ABOUT HOW THE NEW CODE
10:43:43PM WOULD APPLY.
10:43:47PM THEY COULD PROBABLY AT THIS POINT SAY, I WOULD RATHER HAVE
10:43:49PM THE NEW CODE APPLIED.
10:43:50PM IT WOULD REQUIRE A CONTINUANCE AND REVIEW OF THE NEW CODE.
10:43:53PM SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD THAT THIS WAS
10:43:57PM REVIEWED UNDER THE OLD CODE.
10:43:59PM NOW, IF YOU ARE ASKING WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S ANY
10:44:02PM SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCE, THERE MOST LIKELY WOULD NOT BE IN
10:44:07PM THE FORM OF THEY ARE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO ASK FOR THESE
10:44:11PM TREE WAIVERS.
10:44:12PM THERE IS A POTENTIAL MITIGATION, WHICH IS A LARGE PART OF
10:44:18PM THE CHANGES BETWEEN THE OLD TREE CODE AND THE NEW TREE CODE
10:44:22PM COULD CHANGE.
10:44:24PM AND IT WAS ALSO TESTIFIED TO EARLIER THAT AT THE PERMITTING
10:44:27PM PROCESS, SOME OF THESE PETITIONS ARE MADE AT THE PERMITTING
10:44:30PM PROCESS.
10:44:31PM THEY HAVE TO REPLACE TREES.
10:44:34PM VERY STRINGENT THINGS THAT HAD TO BE ON YOUR PROPERTY AND
10:44:38PM NOW WE ALLOW SOME LEEWAY IN THAT.
10:44:41PM BECAUSE THAT'S DETERMINED AT THE PERMITTING PROCESS WHICH IS
10:44:44PM IN THE FUTURE, THEY COULD PROBABLY TAKE AN IMAGE OF THAT.
10:44:46PM BUT IT'S JUST IMPORTANT TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD THAT
10:44:50PM ARGUMENTS BASED UPON THE NEW CODE ALLOWING CERTAIN TREES TO
10:44:54PM COME OUT AND CERTAIN TREES NOT TO COME OUT ISN'T REALLY
10:44:58PM REFLECTIVE OF WHAT HAPPENS HERE BECAUSE IT WAS REVIEWED
10:45:02PM UNDER THE OLD TREE CODE, AND THEY COULD HAVE DONE THAT
10:45:06PM BECAUSE IT'S IN PLACE NOW, BUT IT WOULD REQUIRE STAFF TO
10:45:09PM EVALUATE THAT AND IT WASN'T.
10:45:10PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
10:45:13PM >>REBECCA KERT: I WASN'T TRYING TO OVERCOMPLICATE THAT BUT
10:45:22PM IN CASE WE END UP IN LITIGATION I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO
10:45:24PM HAVE THE FACTS CLEAR ON THAT.
10:45:26PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND MR. CITRO.
10:45:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING A QUESTION THAT WAS
10:45:30PM HARD FOR ME TO ASK EARLIER.
10:45:32PM THANK YOU.
10:45:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
10:45:33PM >>MARK BENTLEY: THANKS AGAIN.
10:45:37PM APPRECIATE IT.
10:45:38PM CONCERNING THE LOADING AREA, HERE IS THE SITE PLAN BEFORE
10:45:40PM YOU.
10:45:40PM IT SAYS 10 BY 30 LOADING BERTH.
10:45:43PM OKAY.
10:45:43PM AND IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR WAIVER SHEET, WE REQUESTED A WAIVER
10:45:47PM BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FROM THE LOADING BERTH.
10:45:50PM AND OUR WAIVER WAS TO GO FROM 12 BY 30 TO 10 BY 30.
10:45:54PM SO WE ARE COMMITTED TO THIS LOADING BERTH.
10:45:58PM AND THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CODE IS TWO FEET.
10:46:01PM 12 BY 30 VERSUS 10 BY 30.
10:46:04PM OKAY?
10:46:04PM SO WE HAVE A LOADING AREA.
10:46:06PM THAT'S RESOLVED.
10:46:07PM >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CARLSON.
10:46:14PM >>BILL CARLSON: CAN WE ASK TRANSPORTATION?
10:46:16PM >>LUIS VIERA: SURE.
10:46:18PM >>BILL CARLSON: YOU SAID IT'S TWO FEET DIFFERENCE.
10:46:20PM >> DO YOU HAVE A HARD RULE THAT HAS TO BE 10 BY 30 -- OR 12
10:46:26PM BY 30 INSTEAD OF 10 BY 30?
10:46:28PM >> JONATHAN: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
10:46:40PM IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO GET IN AND GET OUT OF THERE, WITH
10:46:44PM DOORS OPEN AND ALL OF THAT STUFF.
10:46:46PM IT'S MORE THAN JUST THE SIZE OF IT.
10:46:53PM TYPICALLY A LOADING SPACE IS 12 BY 60 FOR THE FIRST ONE AND
10:46:57PM THEN 12 BY 30 IF YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO A SECOND ONE.
10:47:01PM SOMETIMES THEY DO ASK FOR WAIVERS. IN THIS CASE IT DOESN'T
10:47:05PM MAKE SENSE TO HAVE IT LIKE THAT TO MEET ANY OF OUR TECHNICAL
10:47:10PM REQUIREMENTS.
10:47:10PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
10:47:14PM >>MARK BENTLEY: HERE IS THE SITE PLAN.
10:47:16PM >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
10:47:19PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [OFF MICROPHONE]
10:47:24PM >> ACTUALLY, IT'S GOING TO BE 12 BY 30. IT'S 10 BY 30.
10:47:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 30 SQUARE FEET?
10:47:37PM >> NO, LINEAL FEET.
10:47:40PM IT'S LINEAL FEET, COUNCIL
10:47:43PM THERE WAS A SUGGESTION BY MRS. MANDELL THAT THINGS CHANGED,
10:47:47PM ET CETERA.
10:47:47PM HERE IS THE SITE PLAN BEFORE YOU.
10:47:48PM YOU SEE THIS BOX HERE.
10:47:50PM THESE ARE THE TREES BEHIND THE PROPERTY AND MR. KEY
10:47:57PM TESTIFIED ABOUT HIS VIEW.
10:47:58PM YOU SEE THOSE TREES.
10:48:02PM WE CAN'T REMOVE THOSE ANYHOW.
10:48:03PM WE LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, THAT BOX SAYS TREES TO BE SAVED
10:48:07PM SUBJECT TO TRANSPORTATION.
10:48:10PM DECISION ON THAT.
10:48:17PM SO CONCERNING MR. PRIDA'S CONCERN ABOUT THE OUTDOOR DECK.
10:48:21PM WE ACTUALLY TOLD THE RESIDENTS WE HAD A MEETING WITH THEM
10:48:24PM THAT THE DECK WOULD BE SHIFTED TO GANDY BOULEVARD.
10:48:28PM WE DID THAT PLAN THAT'S BEFORE YOU.
10:48:31PM SO IT'S OVER HERE ABOUT 130 FEET AWAY.
10:48:37PM FROM THE RESIDENTS.
10:48:39PM THIS ISSUE ABOUT THE DENSITY OF THE PROJECT OR INTENSITY,
10:48:42PM ONCE YOU COMMIT TO MIXED USE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAKES
10:48:46PM A DETERMINATION THAT YOU FULFILLED THAT OBLIGATION BECAUSE
10:48:49PM THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT USES UNDER THE CITY'S USE SCHEDULE,
10:48:52PM IT SAYS ON PAGE 2, YOUR STAFF REPORT, THE SITE WOULD BE
10:48:56PM ELIGIBLE FOR 1.5 F.A.R. BY RIGHT.
10:49:00PM NOT DISCRETIONARY.
10:49:01PM OUR F.A.R. IS 1.26.
10:49:03PM SO WE QUALIFY THERE.
10:49:08PM HERE IS MR. KEY'S PROPERTY.
10:49:11PM IRONICALLY, WE USE THAT AS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS
10:49:13PM PRESENTATION -- I DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE REALLY TO GET TO IT
10:49:17PM TOO MUCH.
10:49:17PM HERE IS A VIEW MR. KEY'S PROPERTY LOOKING TOWARDS THE
10:49:20PM PROJECT.
10:49:21PM YOU CAN SEE THE FOLIAGE OF TREES THAT HE HAS IN HIS
10:49:23PM BACKYARD.
10:49:24PM AND YOU CAN SEE THE LITTLE KEY HOLE THAT MR. KEY, ALL THIS
10:49:31PM VEGETATION, AND WHAT WE DID -- AND THIS IS A CONDITION
10:49:34PM HERE -- WE HAVE TO PUT SCREENING IN ANYHOW, BUT WE AGREED WE
10:49:39PM WOULD PUT SCREENING THAT WAS OVER TWICE THE CODE REQUIREMENT
10:49:42PM FOR THESE RED CEDARS.
10:49:44PM SO WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS IDENTIFIED, FOR EXAMPLE, MR. KEY'S
10:49:47PM PROPERTY, THESE RED CEDARS WILL BE PLANTED, 20 FEET TALL,
10:49:51PM 65-GALLON AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
10:50:05PM AND IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING ONCE AGAIN, THE CG IMPLICATIONS
10:50:08PM OF DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY CG HAS THE SAME CHALLENGES WITH THE
10:50:12PM TREES.
10:50:12PM I WANT COUNCIL TO KNOW THE DEVELOPMENT CG, LIKE I SAID,
10:50:16PM COULD YOU PUT THEORETICALLY 90,000 SQUARE FEET AND
10:50:20PM MULTI-STORY.
10:50:21PM AND THE HEIGHT 20 FEET FROM THEIR PROPERTY WOULD BE 45 FEET.
10:50:24PM OKAY?
10:50:25PM THERE'S NO TIERING.
10:50:27PM THERE'S NO SENSITIVITY.
10:50:28PM THERE'S NO BUFFERING.
10:50:29PM THINGS LIKE THAT.
10:50:30PM ALL THEY HAVE TO HAVE IS 10-FOOT BUFFER WITH SOME
10:50:33PM VEGETATION.
10:50:34PM THERE'S ALREADY A WALL THERE.
10:50:35PM THAT'S THE END OF THAT STORY.
10:50:36PM OKAY?
10:50:37PM SO I THINK WE HAVE REALLY GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND TO BE
10:50:42PM SENSITIVE TO THIS ISSUE OF YOU IN TERMS OF TREE REMOVAL.
10:50:45PM A LOT OF THESE TREES, AND JOE WAS TRYING TO DEPRESS UPON US,
10:50:50PM THAT THERE'S 26 OF THE 57 TREES ARE PALMS.
10:50:57PM OKAY.
10:50:57PM AND A LOT OF THESE TREES, THESE TRAILERS, AND PADS AND
10:51:01PM THINGS HAVE GROWN ON THEM, IMPACTED UPON THEM SO IT WOULD BE
10:51:05PM A REAL CHALLENGE.
10:51:08PM FORGET ABOUT TAKING THE MOBILE HOMES OUT.
10:51:10PM JUST FOR THE SURVIVABILITY OF THESE TREES ONCE WE TAKE ALL
10:51:13PM THAT STUFF OUT.
10:51:14PM AND WE ARE READY, WILLING AND ABLE TO PLANT AS MANY TREES AS
10:51:19PM WE CAN ON THE PROPERTY.
10:51:20PM NOW, IN TERMS OF TRANSPORTATION, THAT'S BEEN AN ONGOING
10:51:23PM ISSUE.
10:51:27PM OUR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER.
10:51:32PM >> MICHAEL YATES.
10:51:33PM I WANT TO ADDRESS A COUPLE THINGS THAT GOT BROUGHT UP.
10:51:36PM FIRST IS THE TRIP GENERATION FOR THE PROJECTS.
10:51:40PM AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROJECT WILL ONLY GENERATE 29 AM PEAK
10:51:46PM HOURS WITH THEM AND 38 P.M. PEAK HOURS.
10:51:50PM SO A VERY LOW TRIP GENERATOR.
10:51:53PM THE SECOND IS THE SITE CIRCULATION.
10:51:55PM THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROJECT TRAFFIC.
10:52:02PM WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS A RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT ACCESS ON
10:52:06PM GANDY BOULEVARD.
10:52:08PM AND THEN THE EXISTING ZION ACCESS WOULD BE IMPROVED, BUT
10:52:12PM THAT WOULD BE A FULL ACCESS TO GANDY BOULEVARD.
10:52:18PM THEN WE WOULD USE THE ACCESS TO MacDILL FOR INBOUND
10:52:20PM TRAFFIC ONLY.
10:52:22PM SO THIS DRIVEWAY TO THE ALLEY TO THE BACK WOULD BE INBOUND
10:52:28PM TRAFFIC AND THEN THE OUTBOUND TRAFFIC WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO
10:52:31PM MAKE A RIGHT OUT.
10:52:33PM IN OUR SITE PLAN WE PUT A TRAFFIC SEPARATOR IN THERE TO
10:52:38PM FORCE EVERYONE TO THE EAST.
10:52:39PM WE RAN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS.
10:52:41PM THEY ARE ALL A ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE ON BOTH THE
10:52:47PM MacDILL AND ZION ACCESS ACCEPTABLE SERVICE AS WELL AS
10:52:51PM THE INTERSECTIONS OF GANDY AND MacDILL, AND GANDY AND
10:52:54PM BAYSHORE.
10:52:57PM THIS IS DURING THE AM AND P.M. PEAK HOUR.
10:53:01PM AND.
10:53:03PM >>MARK BENTLEY: AND THIS SUGGESTION, HERE AGAIN MOST OF
10:53:05PM THESE UNITS ARE ONE BEDROOM UNITS.
10:53:08PM YOU HAVE THE SAME PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR ONE AND TWO
10:53:10PM BEDROOM UNDER THE ZONING DECODE.
10:53:12PM SO WE FEEL WE HAVE SUFFICIENT PARKING.
10:53:15PM ALSO, IN THIS ISSUE, THE WAIVERS, A LOT OF TIMES THESE
10:53:18PM NUMBERS, I THINK WE WHITTLED IT DOWN AT THIS POINT TO NINE
10:53:23PM WAIVERS.
10:53:23PM LET ME POINT OUT TO YOU COUNCIL THAT WAIVERS 6, 7 AND 8,
10:53:29PM THESE RELATE SOLELY TO DECORATIVE WALLS AROUND THE PROJECTS
10:53:33PM FOR LACK OF A WALL NEXT TO YOGURTOLOGY OVER ON THE WEST SIDE
10:53:38PM HAS A WALL.
10:53:39PM SO WE LOOKED AT A WAIVER, WHY HAVE TWO MASONRY WALLS?
10:53:43PM ONCE YOU DEDUCT THE WALL WAIVERS WE ARE DOWN TO SIX.
10:53:46PM WE HAVE THE FOUR GRAND TREES WE SPOKE ABOUT.
10:53:48PM THE 50% TREE RETENTION.
10:53:50PM AND THEN IN TANDEM WITH ANY ONE OF THESE PERCENTAGES, YOU
10:53:56PM HAVE TO MAKE A CONTRIBUTION, SO THAT CONSTITUTES ANOTHER
10:53:58PM WAIVER.
10:53:59PM AND WE HAVE WAIVER IN TERMS OF THE GREEN SPACE FOR
10:54:05PM APARTMENT.
10:54:05PM IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE 350.
10:54:07PM AND WE GOT IT DOWN TO 287 PLUS.
10:54:10PM IN COMBINATION WITH THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY IN LIEU FOR THE
10:54:13PM BALANCE OF 80 SQUARE FEET THAT YOU COULDN'T PROVIDE ON-SITE.
10:54:16PM SO IT'S NOT A LOT OF WAIVERS.
10:54:18PM EACH ONE OF THESE WAIVERS WHEN YOU PAY IN, IT'S KIND OF
10:54:23PM DUPLICITOUS SO THERE'S SIX WAIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
10:54:26PM PROJECT.
10:54:28PM SO I THINK WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING WE CAN.
10:54:30PM WE HAVE HAD MULTIPLE MEETINGS OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS
10:54:33PM WITH THE NEIGHBORS.
10:54:35PM I HADN'T MENTIONED IT AND HOPEFULLY YOU HAD THE OPPORTUNITY
10:54:38PM TO READ ALL THESE LETTERS I HAVE BEEN FILTERING TO YOUR
10:54:41PM OFFICE.
10:54:41PM WE HAVE HAWTHORNE POND CONDO ASSOCIATION.
10:54:44PM YOU HEARD ONE GENTLEMAN TESTIFY THEY ARE IN SUPPORT.
10:54:48PM MULTIPLE BUSINESSES UP IN TOWN, GANDY, AND A LOT OF RESIDENT
10:54:51PM HAVE SENT IN LETTERS OF SUPPORT.
10:54:53PM SO IT'S NOT KIND OF A ONE-WAY STREET.
10:54:57PM OBVIOUSLY SO OF THESE RESIDENTS WHO ATTEMPT LIVE ON
10:55:02PM HAWTHORNE THEY LIVE ON THE NORTH SIDE, THEY DON'T HAVE AN
10:55:09PM OPPORTUNITY VIEW OUR PROPERTY.
10:55:10PM THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
10:55:12PM [BELL SOUNDS]
10:55:14PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
10:55:15PM MR. DINGFELDER.
10:55:15PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. BENTLEY, I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS FOR
10:55:20PM STAFF, BUT BEFORE I DO,
10:55:24PM THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL REFERENCES FOR THE EXISTING ZONING, CG,
10:55:29PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
10:55:30PM OKAY.
10:55:33PM WHY NOT JUST USE THAT?
10:55:36PM >>MARK BENTLEY: YOU CAN'T.
10:55:38PM BECAUSE WHAT THEY DO IS THEY APPLY RM-24 STANDARD AND WHEN
10:55:42PM YOU DO THE MATH IN TERMS OF NUMBER OF UNITS YOU GET
10:55:44PM SOMEWHERE IN THE RANGE OF -- DON'T HOLD ME TO IT, BUT 35 TO
10:55:48PM 50 UNITS, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
10:55:50PM AND YOU DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO GET ANY WAIVERS OR ANY
10:55:53PM KIND OF DESIGN MODIFICATIONS.
10:55:56PM YOU ARE KIND OF PIGEONHOLED INTO THE DIMENSIONAL
10:56:00PM REQUIREMENTS OF CG.
10:56:01PM SO WE COULDN'T GET THE DENSITY OR INTENSITY.
10:56:10PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT ARGUABLY, YOU JUST SAID, AND I WILL
10:56:13PM HOLD YOU TO IT OR GET AN EXPERT UP HERE TO TELL ME WHAT IT
10:56:16PM IS TO GET AN ANSWER TO IT, THAT UNDER THE CG, I GUESS USING
10:56:23PM THE FLOOR AREA RATIO WITH THE CG OR HOWEVER YOU CALCULATE
10:56:26PM THE NUMBER OF UNITS FOR THE CG, HOW MANY UNITS DO YOU END
10:56:30PM UP?
10:56:32PM >>MARK BENTLEY: UNDER CG?
10:56:34PM FOR MULTIFAMILY?
10:56:35PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
10:56:36PM >>MARK BENTLEY: I COULDN'T TELL YOU.
10:56:38PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, HAVE SOMEBODY TELL ME BECAUSE IT'S
10:56:40PM AN IMPORTANT QUESTION.
10:56:41PM >> THIS HAPPENED IN OUR PREVIOUS --
10:56:50PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I MEAN YOU ARE ASKING FOR AN ALTERNATIVE
10:56:52PM TO A CG.
10:56:54PM SO WHAT I AM SAYING IS, TELL ME WHY THE CG IS NO GOOD.
10:56:59PM HOW MANY UNITS CAN YOU GET UNDER THE CG?
10:57:01PM >> WITH THE CG -- ALSO, I THINK WHICH STAFF CONFIRMED, YOU
10:57:10PM ARE HELD TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS WITH RESPECT TO
10:57:15PM MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
10:57:16PM SO IT'S 35 UNITS PER ACRE, CMU-35, SO 1.76 TIMES MUCH 35
10:57:27PM WOULD BE 2.0.
10:57:30PM AM I RIGHT, DAVID?
10:57:31PM >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
10:57:36PM UNDER THE -- BECAUSE YOU ONLY GET A 30 BY RIGHT --
10:57:41PM >> 30 BY RIGHT.
10:57:43PM >>DAVID HEY: UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, THE 1.76
10:57:47PM ACRES WOULD GET YOU 52 UNITS.
10:57:50PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 52 UNITS.
10:57:52PM >>DAVID HEY: 352 UNITS.
10:57:58PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DO YOU CONCUR WITH THAT, MR. CARNEGIE?
10:58:01PM >> YES.
10:58:02PM THAT IS THE MAXIMUM ONES I APPLIED FOR.
10:58:06PM BUT REMEMBER YOU WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
10:58:08PM THAT WE ARE HERE BEING ABLE TO SEEK ADJUSTMENTS FROM
10:58:13PM WAIVERS.
10:58:15PM WE HAVE ALREADY POINTED OUT, FOR EXAMPLE, MR. DINGFELDER,
10:58:17PM THAT THE TREES THAT ARE THERE RIGHT NOW, WHICH WE WOULD HAVE
10:58:20PM TO MAINTAIN, ARE HIS, WE ARE ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITIVE.
10:58:25PM SO WE COULD NOT --
10:58:27PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU MADE A PRESUMPTION.
10:58:28PM THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD, WHICH IS THE VARIANCE REVIEW
10:58:31PM BOARD.
10:58:33PM I'M JUST SAYING.
10:58:34PM IF YOU HAVE THE CG, WHICH YOU DO, YOU HAVE THE CG TODAY, OR
10:58:40PM YOUR CLIENT DOES, IF YOU HAVE THE CG, AND YOU WANT TO REMOVE
10:58:45PM MORE THAN 50% OF THE TREES, THEN YOU GO TO THE VRB, RIGHT?
10:58:49PM >> YES.
10:58:50PM YOU CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT.
10:58:51PM BUT WITH RESPECT TO THINGS LIKE, YOU KNOW, THE ADDITIONAL
10:58:55PM PARKING AND ALL OF THOSE, IT'S NOT JUST ONE WAIVER WITH
10:59:00PM RESPECT TO THE TREES.
10:59:01PM THERE ARE MANY, MANY THINGS THAT WE ARE HERE PROVIDING A
10:59:05PM SING COMPREHENSIVE BE COHESIVE PACKAGE TO GET APPROVAL FOR.
10:59:09PM AND SO MY RESPONSE TO YOU IS, IT IS A MUCH BETTER PROCESS.
10:59:18PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
10:59:19PM THANK YOU.
10:59:21PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING FURTHER, COUNCIL?
10:59:23PM QUESTIONS?
10:59:25PM NO FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
10:59:29PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FOR THE PETITIONER?
10:59:31PM >>LUIS VIERA: FOR ANYBODY, PETITIONER, STAFF, ANYONE?
10:59:33PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
10:59:37PM COUNCIL, MR. BENTLEY PROVIDED A ZONING CONDITION, A
10:59:43PM COMMITMENT TO PROVIDE THE SCREENING ON THE NORTH.
10:59:47PM IF THAT IS A DESIRE, THE APPLICANT, AND TO PROVIDE THAT
10:59:52PM SCREENING FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE LOCATED TO THE NORTH,
10:59:55PM WE WILL NEED TO HAVE IT SUBMITTED IN ADDITION TO THE SHEET
11:00:00PM THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO YOU IN THE RECORD.
11:00:02PM >> THIS IS THE SCREENING ALLUDED TO FOR MR. KEY'S HOUSE.
11:00:07PM THAT RELATES TO THOSE RED CEDARS AT 20 FEET AT THE TIME OF
11:00:11PM PLANNING.
11:00:11PM >>LACHONE DOCK: I WILL PROVIDE THIS TO YOU AND THAT WILL BE
11:00:15PM ADDED.
11:00:19PM >>BILL CARLSON: IF I COULD ASK YOU A QUESTION.
11:00:21PM SEVERAL FOLKS SAID THAT THERE WERE CONDITIONS THAT WERE
11:00:27PM MENTIONED TONIGHT THAT -- ARE THERE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT
11:00:31PM HAVEN'T BEEN DOCUMENTED YET?
11:00:35PM >>MARK BENTLEY: MR. CARLSON, THAT CONDITION IS ALREADY CODE
11:00:41PM REQUIREMENT, LIKE PLANTING RED CEDAR, AND SAYS IT ONLY HAS
11:00:44PM TO BE 35 GALLONS AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
11:00:47PM THERE'S NO MINIMUM HEIGHT.
11:00:48PM SO WHAT WE DID IS WE WANT TO TAKE IT UP A NOTCH TO ENSURE
11:00:52PM THAT THERE'S MITIGATION OF VIEW.
11:00:55PM SO WE HAVE AGREED TO 65-GALLON AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AND
11:00:59PM 20 FEET.
11:01:03PM IT WAS ALREADY REQUIRED.
11:01:04PM WE JUMPED&IT UP, YOU KNOW.
11:01:10PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
11:01:12PM OKAY.
11:01:14PM MR. SHELBY.
11:01:15PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THERE IS NO OTHER TESTIMONY AND
11:01:18PM MR. BENTLEY FEELS THE NEED FOR A FINAL WORD HE HAS THAT
11:01:22PM OPPORTUNITY.
11:01:22PM >>MARK BENTLEY: JUST ONE FINAL THING.
11:01:25PM THERE'S BEEN SO MUCH INFORMATION, IS THAT ACCORDING TO THE
11:01:29PM TRAFFIC ENGINEER, WHERE THEY HAVE 80 UNITS FOR 50 PM-AM
11:01:37PM PEAK, IT'S PRETTY INSIGNIFICANT.
11:01:39PM YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC IMPACT
11:01:41PM BETWEEN GANDY OR 50 UNITS FROM A TRAFFIC STANDPOINT.
11:01:45PM THANK YOU.
11:01:50PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE'LL GIVE YOU ONE MINUTE.
11:01:51PM >> RUSIAN FEDOTENKO: I CAME HERE AS AN IMMIGRANT.
11:01:59PM SO I CAME FROM THE COUNTRY WHERE SOMETIMES YOU CAN GO
11:02:05PM DIFFERENT WAYS.
11:02:06PM AND I WAS HOPING HERE IS FOR CERTAIN THINGS, I KNOW A LOT OF
11:02:13PM PEOPLE SAY, OH, SQUARE FEET OF MIXED USE, BUT IF IT'S IN THE
11:02:21PM LAW, I WAS HOPING YOU GUYS WOULD BE ABLE TO INTERPRET THEIR
11:02:24PM LAWS THE RIGHT WAY.
11:02:25PM VERSUS IF YOU HAVE -- WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BUILD CERTAIN
11:02:29PM THINGS BY THE LAW.
11:02:31PM I AM JUST HOPING YOU LOOK INTO THAT AND NOT JUST THINKING,
11:02:35PM JUST GO OVER IT WITH A MOTION WITH SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS.
11:02:38PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:02:39PM I APPRECIATE IT.
11:02:40PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
11:02:43PM DOES COUNCIL WISH TO HAVE DISCUSSION BEFORE -- THOUGHTS,
11:02:49PM OPINIONS?
11:02:51PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BEFORE WE CLOSE, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK I
11:02:56PM GUESS MS. DOCK OR MS. KERT A QUESTION RELATED TO THIS
11:03:05PM 700-FOOT OFFICE SPACE THAT SOMEHOW OR ANOTHER TRANSLATES,
11:03:14PM WHICH SOMEBODY SAID IS LESS THAN 1% OF THE WHOLE PROJECT.
11:03:18PM IT SOMEHOW BUMPS THIS UP INTO NOW BEING CALLED A MIXED USE.
11:03:22PM >>LACHONE DOCK: YES.
11:03:29PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I FIND IT A LITTLE INCREDULOUS, A LITTLE
11:03:32PM HARD TO BELIEVE THAT THAT IS THE INTENT OF THE CODE.
11:03:38PM TO MAKE THAT -- TO MAKE THAT MIXED USE.
11:03:47PM WHY NOT 10 FEET?
11:03:50PM 10-FOOT IS RIDICULOUS.
11:03:51PM OKAY.
11:03:51PM 20-FOOT OFFICE.
11:03:53PM OKAY.
11:03:53PM WHY SHOULDN'T THAT BE A MIXED USE?
11:03:55PM >> TWO MIXED USE CATEGORIES, ESPECIALLY THE COMMUNITY
11:04:01PM COMMERCIAL AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
11:04:03PM THERE'S A PROVISION THAT ALONG THESE MIXED USE CORRIDORS,
11:04:08PM WITHIN THE MIXED USE CATEGORIES, DEVELOPMENTS THAT INCLUDE
11:04:12PM TWO USES FROM TWO DIFFERENT LAND USE TABLES WITHIN THE LDC
11:04:18PM CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR BUMP-UP.
11:04:20PM THAT CAME AS A PLAN AMENDMENT ABOUT THREE YEARS AGO TO THE
11:04:23PM PREVIOUS COUNCIL.
11:04:28PM THE CITY STAFF IN COOPERATION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
11:04:33PM WAS LOOKING AT THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF MIXED USE.
11:04:36PM BEFORE THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT AT ALL.
11:04:38PM THERE STILL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR MIXED USE.
11:04:41PM BUT BEFORE THAT, THERE WAS NO INCENTIVE OR ANYTHING TO HAVE
11:04:46PM MIXED USE ON THESE IDENTIFIED CORRIDORS.
11:04:49PM IT WAS CITY STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF THAT CAME UP
11:04:54PM TO ENCOURAGE A MIXTURE OF USES ON THESE CORRIDORS TO COME UP
11:04:59PM WITH THIS INCENTIVE.
11:05:00PM BASICALLY, ALL THE CATEGORIES WERE CAPPED, IF ANY
11:05:04PM DEVELOPMENT WAS CAPPED AT A ONE F.A.R., AND THEN YOU COULD
11:05:08PM BONUS YOUR WAY UP TO A 2 F.A.R.
11:05:12PM IF YOU MEET THE REQUIREMENTS TO CONTAIN A MIXTURE OF USES IN
11:05:16PM YOUR STRUCTURE, YOU GET THAT BUMP-UP TO A 1.5 BY RIGHT, AND
11:05:21PM THEN YOU CAN STILL BUY UP TO THE 2 F.A.R. THROUGH THE BONUS
11:05:26PM PROVISIONS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
11:05:30PM SO THE THINKING IS TO -- THAT THIS IS THE TYPE DEVELOPMENT
11:05:35PM PATTERN THAT THE COMP PLAN ENCOURAGES ON THESE PARTICULAR
11:05:38PM CORRIDORS.
11:05:39PM A MIXTURE OF USES.
11:05:41PM THERE IS IN A MINIMUM, THOUGH, WITHIN THE COMP PLAN
11:05:43PM CATEGORIES.
11:05:46PM OF WHAT MAKES A MIXED USE.
11:05:48PM IT'S JUST THE INCLUSION OF THE TWO.
11:05:51PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO IT COULD BE A 20 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
11:05:53PM AND STILL BE ALLOWED?
11:05:57PM >>DAVID HEY: TECHNICALLY BY THE COMP PLAN, YES, THAT COULD
11:06:00PM BE UP TO YOUR INTERPRETATION, THOUGH, BECAUSE TO UTILIZE
11:06:04PM THAT, THEY ALWAYS HAVE TO COME AS A PD.
11:06:06PM THEY CAN'T UTILIZE THAT THROUGH A EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT.
11:06:11PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT PART IS LEFT TO OUR DISCRETION.
11:06:13PM I MEAN, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT.
11:06:16PM YOU ARE SAYING WE HAVE DISCRETION TO REJECT THE NOTION THAT
11:06:20PM 700 SQUARE FEET IS ENOUGH TO BUMP THIS INTO A MIXED USE?
11:06:26PM >>DAVID HEY: THERE IS NO MINIMUM WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE
11:06:28PM PLAN.
11:06:32PM THERE'S OTHER FACTORS.
11:06:34PM THAT'S UP TO YOUR INTERPRETATION.
11:06:36PM >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
11:06:40PM WHAT DAVID SAID IS COMPLETELY CORRECT.
11:06:45PM THAT GIVES THEM ENTITLEMENT TO JUSTIFY UP TO A MAXIMUM.
11:06:48PM IT CHANGES THE MAXIMUM.
11:06:49PM BUT THEY ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
11:06:53PM 27-136 WHICH IS THE PURPOSE OF WHAT A SITE PLAN PAGE 8 OF
11:07:00PM YOUR STAFF REPORT, WHICH IS WHERE CITY COUNCIL CAN STILL
11:07:03PM FIND -- THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISION CHANGES THE
11:07:17PM MAXIMUM THAT IS ALLOWED.
11:07:18PM THEY ALSO STILL HAVE TO MEET 27-139 FOR WAIVERS FOR EVERY
11:07:26PM WAIVER THAT IS REQUESTED.
11:07:27PM THAT'S IN YOUR STAFF REPORTS ON PAGE 10.
11:07:29PM I HOPE THAT CLARIFIES THAT, CHANGES THE MAXIMUM, BUT IT DOES
11:07:33PM NOT MEAN THAT THEY STILL DON'T HAVE TO MEET ALL THE OTHER
11:07:36PM PROVISIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT.
11:07:44PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
11:07:45PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
11:07:47PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT'S HARD SOMETIMES TO MAKE A DECISION
11:07:50PM WHICH DON'T HAVE ALL THE FACTS.
11:08:07PM I JUST DON'T THINK THAT WE HAVE A COMPLETED FILE.
11:08:16PM MS. KERT, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A COMPLETE FILE.
11:08:18PM >>REBECCA KERT: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
11:08:21PM THAT GOES TO THE HEART OF THE QUESTION OF WHERE WE ARE WITH
11:08:25PM THE EVIDENCE THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED.
11:08:27PM WHO HAS THE BURDEN OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE BURDEN SHIFTING
11:08:30PM PROCESS?
11:08:31PM THE APPLICANT HAS THE BURDEN TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE IN
11:08:33PM COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
11:08:35PM CODE SECTION, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
11:08:38PM IF THEY HAVE NOT SUBMITTED ENOUGH INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE
11:08:41PM THAT TO YOU, AND YOU CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT CODE, AND YOU HAVE
11:08:45PM IDENTIFIED THE CODE PROVISION THAWS FEEL YOU DON'T HAVE
11:08:47PM ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MEET, THAT'S GROUND FOR DENIAL.
11:08:52PM IF THE APPLICANT HAS MET THAT AND YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL
11:08:54PM INFORMATION, THAT'S NOT GROUND FOR DENIAL.
11:08:58PM BECAUSE ONCE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THEIR BURDEN, THE BURDEN
11:09:01PM SHIFTS TO WHOEVER IS OBJECTING TO IT, BE IT STAFF OR BE IT
11:09:08PM THE COMMUNITY, TO PRESENT EVIDENCE TO YOU.
11:09:12PM SO IF THE APPLICANT HAS MET THEIR BURDEN, AND THERE'S NOT
11:09:15PM ENOUGH EVIDENCE FOR YOU TO DENY IT, YOU DON'T HAVE A BASIS
11:09:19PM TO DENY IT.
11:09:20PM BUT IF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH
11:09:23PM INFORMATION, THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVIDED YOU ENOUGH
11:09:28PM INFORMATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE IN
11:09:31PM COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE, AND YOU ARE BASICALLY SAYING THAT
11:09:34PM THE APPLICANT HAS NOT MET THEIR BURDEN, SO THAT'S WHERE --
11:09:38PM IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THE GAP IS.
11:09:40PM IF THE GAP IS, I WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION BECAUSE MAYBE
11:09:44PM THERE'S A PROBLEM OUT THERE THAT NO ONE HAS PRESENTED TO ME,
11:09:47PM BUT THE APPLICANT HAS MET THEIR BURDEN, THEN THE APPLICANT
11:09:50PM HAS MET THEIR BURDEN.
11:09:51PM >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CARLSON.
11:09:57PM >>BILL CARLSON: THERE'S NO THIRD OPTION, RIGHT?
11:09:59PM WE CAN'T SAY, COME BACK AND BRING US MORE INFORMATION.
11:10:04PM WE HAVE TO VOTE YES OR NO?
11:10:07PM >>REBECCA KERT: WELL, THE APPLICANT HAS THE ABILITY TO SAY,
11:10:09PM I WOULD LIKE A CONTINUANCE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH MORE
11:10:11PM INFORMATION, IF THEY FEEL THAT'S APPROPRIATE.
11:10:13PM BUT IF THE APPLICANT IS LIKE, I HAVE MET MY BURDEN AND I
11:10:20PM WOULD LIKE A VOTE UP OR DOWN, THEN THEY ARE ENTITLED TO A
11:10:23PM VOTE UP OR DOWN WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE YOU MET THEIR
11:10:26PM BURDEN.
11:10:26PM REMEMBER THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE THE BURDEN INITIALLY TO
11:10:29PM DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
11:10:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: [OFF MICROPHONE]
11:10:38PM >>REBECCA KERT: YES.
11:10:39PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYTHING FURTHER FROM COUNCIL?
11:10:40PM OKAY.
11:10:40PM MR. SHELBY.
11:10:41PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T LIKE TO DO THIS NATURALLY BUT WHEN
11:10:47PM COUNCIL TAKES A QUESTION AND TAKES TESTIMONY FROM STAFF, YOU
11:10:50PM NEED TO HAVE TO HAVE THE PETITIONER HAVE THE LAST WORD.
11:10:55PM AS SHORT AS COUNCIL WANTS TO GIVE IT.
11:10:57PM >>LUIS VIERA: WE WILL GIVE YOU ONE MINUTE IF YOU WISH TO DO
11:10:59PM SO.
11:10:59PM IS THAT REASONABLE?
11:11:01PM >>MARK BENTLEY: THAT'S FINE.
11:11:03PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:11:03PM IN TERMS OF THE INFORMATION, COUNCILMAN GUDES, YOU INDICATED
11:11:06PM THERE WAS A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO BE FILED THAT WAS FILED
11:11:09PM TWO WEEKS AGO, AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING IN THE STAFF REPORT
11:11:12PM THAT SAYS THEY HAVEN'T WEIGHED IN ON COMPLETELY THE INTENT
11:11:16PM OF THAT REPORT, A TREE LIMB ANALYSIS, PRUNING REPORT, WAS TO
11:11:21PM CONFIRM WHAT THE FINDINGS WERE BETWEEN THE STAFF AND OUR
11:11:24PM ARBORIST OUT IN THE FIELD.
11:11:25PM WE SUPPLIED THAT TWO WEEKS AGO.
11:11:27PM IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR STAFF REPORT, IT SAYS OUR OBLIGATION WAS
11:11:32PM BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE IMPLICATION THAT THE
11:11:35PM STAFF WOULD HAVE PLENTY OF TIME.
11:11:36PM I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT TO YOU, COUNCIL, THAT THERE'S
11:11:40PM REALLY NO SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT EVIDENCE THAT -- YOU.
11:11:45PM HEARD ANY EXPERT TESTIMONY FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE,
11:11:48PM AND MRS. MANDELL'S INVOLVEMENT IS JUST PURELY LEGAL
11:11:52PM ARGUMENT.
11:11:53PM SHE'S NOT COMPETENT TO TESTIFY CONCERNING COMPATIBILITY,
11:11:56PM TRAFFIC, THINGS LIKE THAT.
11:11:57PM SO AGAIN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:11:58PM I APPRECIATE IT.
11:11:59PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
11:12:01PM OKAY.
11:12:05PM A MOTION TO CLOSE?
11:12:06PM WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
11:12:09PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
11:12:11PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:12:13PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:12:14PM OKAY.
11:12:16PM NOW, TRADITIONALLY, THE CHAIR ALWAYS ASKS SOMEBODY TO READ
11:12:22PM ON MATTERS BUT THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISPUTE.
11:12:24PM I TYPICALLY ASK WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
11:12:27PM JUST TO ALLOW FOLKS TO PROCEED AS THEY WISH.
11:12:32PM SO I WILL SAY WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
11:12:35PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
11:12:39PM FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
11:12:41PM IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3011 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD IN THE
11:12:45PM CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
11:12:48PM SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL
11:12:51PM GENERAL TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY,
11:12:54PM BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, AND INCLUDING THE REVISION
11:12:58PM SHEET, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:13:06PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
11:13:07PM THERE BEING NO SECOND, THE MOTION DIES.
11:13:10PM WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
11:13:22PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIR.
11:13:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:13:28PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM GOING TO MOVE TO DENY THE PETITION.
11:13:32PM I WAS HOPING TO HEAR MR. BENTLEY COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE
11:13:35PM AND ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE, TO CONTINUE TO TWEAK THIS UP, AND
11:13:42PM I THINK HE HAD PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT AND DIDN'T.
11:13:50PM ONE OF THE REASONS, ONE OF THE REASONS THAT I FEEL
11:13:56PM COMFORTABLE MOVING TO DENY IS BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THIS
11:14:01PM PROPERTY HAS AN EXISTING ZONING ON IT THAT'S CG, COMMERCIAL
11:14:05PM GENERAL, WHICH BY THE TESTIMONY OF OUR OWN LAND USE STAFF
11:14:12PM AND CONCURRED TO BY THE TESTIMONY OF MR. CARNEGIE, THE
11:14:16PM PETITION'S LAND USE EXPERT INDICATED HOW MANY UNITS, 52
11:14:21PM UNITS UNDER THE CG, AND THERE WAS NO OBJECTION ON THAT
11:14:25PM NUMBER.
11:14:26PM SO I BELIEVE THAT RIGHT NOW THERE EXISTS A REASONABLE USE
11:14:31PM FOR THAT PROPERTY.
11:14:32PM AND I SAY THAT WITH GREAT EMPHASIS.
11:14:38PM FOR THE RECORD.
11:14:38PM AND THAT'S NOT MY CONCLUSION.
11:14:40PM THAT'S THE CONCLUSION OF EXPERTS WHO TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF
11:14:43PM US TODAY.
11:14:44PM I THINK THAT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT BECAUSE AS MS. KERT
11:14:50PM REMIND US REGULARLY, MR. SHELBY REMIND US REGULARLY, WHEN WE
11:14:54PM ARE DENYING A PETITION WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S
11:14:57PM STILL REASONABLE USE REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY.
11:14:59PM AND THAT REASONABLE USE IS ALREADY THERE ON THE CG.
11:15:04PM SO THE REASON I MOVE TO DENY IS THE FACT THAT I DON'T
11:15:11PM BELIEVE, BASED UPON OUR STAFF REPORT, THAT THEY HAVE MET THE
11:15:18PM STANDARDS FOR THE PD.
11:15:21PM SPECIFICALLY, OUR NATURAL RESOURCES STAFF INDICATES THAT THE
11:15:27PM PETITION IS INCONSISTENT, AND I WILL JUST, IF ALLOWED BY MR.
11:15:34PM SHELBY, WITHOUT REREADING ALL OF THESE, SPECIFICALLY I'LL
11:15:39PM INCORPORATE THE STAFF REPORT BY REFERENCE, I'LL SUMMARIZE
11:15:41PM THE END OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES STAFF REPORT BY INDICATING
11:15:46PM THAT THE PROJECT IS INCONSISTENT BECAUSE OF THE MULTIPLE
11:15:52PM WAIVERS REQUESTED INCLUDING SECTION 13-45, THE REMOVAL OF
11:15:56PM NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
11:15:59PM I'M NOT SURE IF THERE WAS FOUR OF THEM OR EIGHT OF THEM, BUT
11:16:02PM IT WAS MANY OF THEM.
11:16:06PM THE REDUCTION IN MULTIFAMILY GREETING SPACE AND AN
11:16:14PM INCREASE -- A REQUEST FOR THE INCREASE OF THE 50 PERCENT
11:16:18PM TREE RETENTION TO SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 91 AND 94%.
11:16:24PM SO THAT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
11:16:29PM AND THE PETITIONER AND HIS LEGAL STAFF RECOGNIZED THAT WITH
11:16:37PM THE CG USE, THEY COULD GO TO TRY TO GET THOSE TREES REMOVED
11:16:41PM THROUGH THE VARIANCE REVIEW BOARD PROCESS.
11:16:44PM SO IT'S NOT LIKE WE ARE JUST SHUTTING THEM OUT COMPLETELY.
11:16:47PM THEY HAVE AN EXISTING ZONING THAT ALLOWS 52 UNITS AND THEY
11:16:51PM HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE PROCESS THROUGH THE VARIANCE REVIEW
11:16:53PM BOARD TO GET THOSE TREES REMOVED.
11:16:56PM IN ADDITION, I'LL MOVE TO DENY ON THE BASIS OF THE
11:17:00PM TRANSPORTATION REPORT.
11:17:02PM THE TRANSPORTATION STAFF INDICATES THAT 148 PARKING SPACES
11:17:08PM ARE REQUIRED, AND WE ONLY HAVE 138 ARE PROVIDED IN THE SITE
11:17:11PM PLAN, WHICH IS A 7% REDUCTION, AS TESTIFIED BY VARIOUS
11:17:19PM FOLKS, AND ALSO JUST LOGIC, THAT PROJECT IS ON GANDY.
11:17:25PM THERE'S NO ON-STREET PARKING ON GANDY.
11:17:30PM IF THERE'S OVERFLOW, I THINK THE NEXT ADJACENT STREET, WHICH
11:17:36PM IS HAWTHORNE, HAS REASON TO BE CONCERNED THAT PEOPLE MATE
11:17:41PM PARK ON HAWTHORNE AND THEN WALK AROUND.
11:17:44PM AND THAT'S PROBLEMATIC.
11:17:46PM PERSONALLY, I DID DRIVE THIS PROPERTY YESTERDAY.
11:17:50PM MR. MIRANDA SUGGESTED THAT THAT'S ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA,
11:17:54PM ESPECIALLY ON CONTROVERSIAL PROJECTS.
11:17:56PM SO I WENT AND DROVE IT AND I CIRCLED AROUND THAT ALLEY THREE
11:18:00PM DIFFERENT TIMES, WITH WORKERS LOOKING AT ME WHAT WAS I DOING
11:18:03PM THERE?
11:18:03PM BUT I BECAME VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE ALLEY, AND WITH THE
11:18:08PM CONCERNS OF THE HAWTHORNE FOLKS, JUST BY DRIVING THE SITE.
11:18:13PM ADDITIONALLY, THERE WAS A CONCERN RAISED BY TRANSPORTATION
11:18:16PM STAFF ABOUT THE LOADING ZONE.
11:18:20PM STAFF INDICATES WE CAN'T REQUIRE LOADING SPACE, BUT THE
11:18:23PM PETITIONER REALLY DOESN'T SHOW WHERE A REASONABLE LOADING
11:18:28PM AREA WOULD BE THAT WOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE HAWTHORNE
11:18:32PM NEIGHBORS.
11:18:33PM PERSONALLY, I RAISED A CONCERN ABOUT THE DUMPSTER, AND THE
11:18:38PM NOISE FROM THE DUMPSTER.
11:18:42PM THEY DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD SOLUTION TO THAT.
11:18:43PM THEY JUST SAID, YEAH, WE ARE GOING TO ROLL OUT DUMPSTERS OUT
11:18:47PM INTO THE ALLEY AND THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS AND WE ARE NOT
11:18:50PM REALLY SURE WHAT TIME THAT WOULD HAPPEN, YOU KNOW, WHAT TIME
11:18:53PM OF DAY.
11:18:55PM SO TO ME THAT CREATES A POTENTIAL NOISE PROBLEM.
11:19:05PM AS STATED EARLIER, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEY MEET THE INTENT
11:19:12PM AND THAT THEY DON'T SATISFACTORILY MEET SECTION 27-136,
11:19:18PM SPECIFICALLY IN THE STAFF REPORT, AGAIN THE STAFF REPORT
11:19:23PM SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES THE REMOVAL OF 8 HEALTHY GRAND
11:19:28PM TREES, AND MORE THAN 50% OF THE TREES ON-SITE.
11:19:37PM LET'S SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE.
11:19:47PM OH, YES, MS. MANDELL IN HER CORRESPONDENCE TO US SPEAKS TO
11:19:52PM THE MASSING AND SCALE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH I AGREE
11:19:56PM WITH.
11:19:57PM I THINK THE MASSING, THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 80 UNITS BUT BY
11:20:05PM RIGHT TODAY THEY CAN DO 52 UNITS.
11:20:07PM PERHAPS THE 80 UNIT STRUCTURE IS JUST TOO LARGE AND TOO
11:20:10PM MASSIVE FOR THE PROPERTY.
11:20:14PM AND I BELIEVE THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS THAT WE HEARD
11:20:17PM TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THIS.
11:20:21PM THE DENSITY OF THE PROJECT IS TOO DENSE FOR THIS 1.7,
11:20:29PM APPROXIMATELY, ACRES.
11:20:31PM THERE'S NO -- THERE WASN'T ANY GREAT JUSTIFICATION AT ALL
11:20:37PM FOR THE PARKING WAIVER.
11:20:38PM THE ROOF AMENITY, MR. BENTLEY ADDRESSED AND TESTIFIED TO BUT
11:20:43PM MR. BENTLEY IS NOT A LAND USE EXPERT.
11:20:46PM HE'S A GREAT LAWYER BUT NOT A LAND USE EXPERT.
11:20:48PM SO I DIDN'T REALLY HEAR MUCH IN THE WAY OF TESTIMONY THAT
11:20:53PM THAT ROOF AMENITY WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE MOVED OR WAS
11:20:56PM MOVED.
11:21:01PM THAT'S MY LONG WINDED MOTION TO DENY.
11:21:04PM AND I AM GLAD TO ACCEPT ANY FRIENDLY AMENDMENTS.
11:21:08PM >>LUIS VIERA: BEFORE, IF I MAY, I REMEMBER OUR FRIEND
11:21:10PM CHAIRMAN REDDICK WOULD ALWAYS DO THIS BEFORE, MR. SHELBY, IS
11:21:15PM EVERYTHING THERE, SO TO SPEAK, FOR VALID DENIAL?
11:21:20PM I JUST SAY THAT IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION.
11:21:23PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, MR. CHAIRMAN,
11:21:26PM WHAT MR. DINGFELDER DID DO WAS HE CITED THE GENERAL
11:21:30PM STANDARDS, SECTION 27-136.
11:21:34PM HE, PRIOR TO DOING THAT, ALSO REFERENCED FINDINGS OF FACT
11:21:40PM FROM THE STAFF REPORT, AND AS HE WAS TALKING HE WAS MAKING
11:21:44PM CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT, IT APPEARS.
11:21:47PM THE QUESTION THEN IS LOOKING AT SECTION 136 AND LOOKING AT
11:21:52PM THE SUBSECTIONS THAT ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT, NUMBERS 1
11:21:57PM THROUGH 7, IF ANY OTHER PERSON WISHES TO ADD ANYTHING AS TO
11:22:02PM WHETHER THE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTS OR
11:22:07PM REJECTS REQUIREMENTS OF APPROVAL PD, ALSO TO REFER YOU AGAIN
11:22:14PM TO MS. KERT'S REMINDER THAT THERE ARE ALSO MANY WAIVERS
11:22:20PM REQUESTED, THAT'S SUBSECTION 27-139 SUB-4.
11:22:24PM THAT CRITERIA IS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
11:22:26PM BUT THAT WAS NOT REFERENCED IN THE MOTION.
11:22:30PM I JUST WANT TO BRING THAT TO COUNCIL'S ATTENTION IF YOU WISH
11:22:33PM TO DO SO.
11:22:34PM BUT AGAIN THAT IS TOTALLY COUNCIL'S BE--
11:22:37PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND I JUST MAKE IT A HABIT OF CHECKING.
11:22:41PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME ADD ON A LITTLE BIT.
11:22:42PM AND I APPRECIATE THAT, MR. SHELBY.
11:22:44PM YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT AS RELATED TO SECTION 27-139 (4) WHICH
11:22:53PM SPEAKS TO WAIVERS AND GIVES US GUIDANCE A AS TO WAIVERS.
11:22:56PM IT SAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION OF
11:22:59PM THE WAIVER THROUGH THE SITE PLAN REZONING, AND I WILL JUMP
11:23:03PM TO B, WHICH SAYS THE WAIVER, IF ALLOWED, WILL NOT
11:23:06PM SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS
11:23:10PM WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BY ALLOWANCE. WAIVER.
11:23:12PM AND I THINK WE HAVE HEARD COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO
11:23:15PM THE CONTRARY THAT IF WE ALLOWED THESE NINE WAIVERS,
11:23:21PM ESPECIALLY THE ONES I MENTION, THAT THEY WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY
11:23:24PM INTERFERE WITH AND INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE
11:23:27PM PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BY ALLOWANCE OF THE WAIVER.
11:23:31PM I WOULD ALSO ARGUE, C, THAT THE WAIVER IS NOT IN HARMONY,
11:23:37PM THE WAIVERS OR VARIOUS WAIVERS ARE NOT IN HARMONY WITH THE
11:23:39PM GENERAL INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE CHAPTER, THE LAND
11:23:43PM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND
11:23:48PM THEN I DO BELIEVE THAT ALLOWING THE VARIANCE WAIVERS WOULD
11:23:51PM DO SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE CONSIDERING THE PUBLIC BENEFITS
11:23:57PM VERSUS THE PROJECT ISSUES AND INDIVIDUAL HARDSHIPS.
11:24:01PM SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEGAL ADVICE.
11:24:06PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND COUNCILMAN CITRO, I THINK YOU SAID YOU
11:24:11PM WANTED -- ARE YOU SURE?
11:24:12PM OKAY.
11:24:12PM WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:24:14PM DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
11:24:16PM WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, A SECOND BY
11:24:19PM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:24:21PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:24:23PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:24:24PM >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO DENY PASSED WITH MANISCALCO VOTING
11:24:32PM NO.
11:24:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT WE GO TO NUMBER 11.
11:24:46PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
11:24:54PM BE REZ 19-40 FOR PROPERTY AT 2904 NORTH OLA AVENUE, THE
11:25:00PM REQUEST FROM RS-50 TO PD DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
11:25:04PM THE APPLICANT IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, NICHOLAS BE
11:25:12PM JAMAL.
11:25:12PM >> DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING STAFF.
11:25:18PM I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
11:25:19PM WE END THIS EVENING IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS.
11:25:24PM MORE SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
11:25:34PM THERE IS TRANSIT WITHIN 800 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON WEST
11:25:36PM COLUMBUS DRIVE. WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE IS SERVED BY HART ROUTE
11:25:38PM 15.
11:25:41PM THE CLOSEST FACILITY IS A PLAYGROUND LOCATED WILLIAM 950
11:25:45PM FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
11:25:47PM AND THE SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
11:25:53PM ONTO THE AERIAL.
11:25:59PM HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
11:26:00PM THIS IS OLA.
11:26:01PM WE HAVE MARCH TO THE SOUTH.
11:26:04PM THIS IS THE GW WATERS CENTER.
11:26:07PM SHOULD BE SOUTHEAST.
11:26:09PM AND THEN YOU HAVE THE VILLA MCDONNA TO THE SOUTHWEST.
11:26:13PM YOU HAVE GRAHAM ELEMENTARY TO THE NORTHWEST.
11:26:16PM AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A MIXTURE OF DUPLEXES AND
11:26:20PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ALSO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE
11:26:24PM NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
11:26:26PM ONTO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
11:26:29PM THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTY SURROUNDING IT IN THAT TAN
11:26:33PM COLOR ARE ALL THE RESIDENTIAL 10.
11:26:35PM AS YOU GO FURTHER SOUTH IT STARTS GETTING A LITTLE MORE
11:26:41PM DENSE IN CHARACTER WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
11:26:44PM THE BLUE REPRESENT IT IS PUBLIC QUASI-PUBLIC BUT THOSE USES
11:26:48PM I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY.
11:26:49PM AND THEN DOWN ON COLUMBUS YOU HAVE THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
11:26:52PM 35 IN THE PINK.
11:26:54PM YOU HAVE GOT COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 RUNNING UP AND DOWN
11:26:58PM FLORIDA AVENUE REPRESENTED BY THE RED.
11:27:01PM AND THEN IT ACTUALLY GOES INTO RESIDENTIAL 35 SOUTH OF
11:27:05PM COLUMBUS DRIVE.
11:27:09PM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPED PARCELS ADJACENT TO NORTH OLA AVENUE
11:27:13PM BETWEEN -- A STREET NAMED WEST STREET, AND WEST GLADE
11:27:20PM STREET.
11:27:21PM I CHECKED WITH JIMMY COOK, AND THAT'S THE RIGHT NAME --
11:27:24PM EXCLUDING THE SITE, HAS DENSITY OF 8.2 UNITS PER ACRE.
11:27:29PM PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF TWO
11:27:31PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE,
11:27:33PM AND OVERALL DENSITY 56.9 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
11:27:38PM WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
11:27:41PM CATEGORY.
11:27:44PM PROPOSED PD WILL BE OF SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT, AND SCALE OF
11:27:47PM THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
11:27:50PM AND THE PROPOSAL WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR EXISTING
11:27:55PM DEVELOPMENT PATTERN FOUND IN THIS PORTION OF THE TAMPA
11:27:58PM HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
11:27:58PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
11:28:02PM RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE
11:28:07PM FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
11:28:10PM PLAN.
11:28:10PM >>LACHONE DOCK: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
11:28:20PM COUNCIL, THIS PROPERTY IS PARTLY ZONED RS RESIDENTIAL
11:28:24PM SINGLE-FAMILY.
11:28:24PM THE REQUEST IS TO A PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE-FAMILY
11:28:27PM RESIDENTIAL DETACHED USE.
11:28:30PM THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
11:28:33PM RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
11:28:34PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PART OF THE PLAT OF CR SUBDIVISION,
11:28:41PM LOTS 3 AND 4.
11:28:48PM THIS IS THE MAP.
11:28:50PM THIS IS OLA AVENUE.
11:28:52PM THIS IS WARREN.
11:28:57PM THIS IS THE SITE THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED HERE IN THE STRIPES.
11:29:01PM THIS SITE IS LOCATED CURRENTLY IN THE RS-50 ZONING.
11:29:05PM YOU SEE THERE'S A COUPLE OF RM DESIGNATIONS.
11:29:08PM ONE TO THE NORTH AND THEN SOUTH OF THE SITE.
11:29:11PM AND THIS PARTICULAR MAP THESE LOTS THAT ARE JUST NORTH OF
11:29:16PM THE SITE ARE THE LOTS THAT ARE OVER 45 FEET AND THEY ARE
11:29:21PM LESS THAN 50 SO THEY ARE BETWEEN 45 TO 49 FEET IN WIDTH.
11:29:26PM THE LOTS THAT IMMEDIATELY NORTH.
11:29:28PM AND THEN THEY INCREASE SLOWLY TO 50 TO 54 FEET FURTHER NORTH
11:29:33PM IN THE DARKER BLUE.
11:29:37PM SO THE LOTS 3 AND 4, THEY ARE PLATTED AS FOLLOWS.
11:29:40PM LOT 3 IS 45 FEET WIDE AND LOT 4 IS PLATTED AT 44 FEET WIDE.
11:29:46PM BOTH LOTS WERE PLATTED AT 167 FEET OF DEPTH.
11:29:50PM SO THEY ARE DEEP.
11:29:51PM THEY JUST DON'T HAVE THE WIDTH.
11:29:53PM THIS REQUEST WOULD CREATE THE TWO BUILDABLE SINGLE-FAMILY
11:29:57PM RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITH THE LOT 3 AT 7,515 SQUARE FEET, AND
11:30:01PM LOT 4 AT 7,348 SQUARE FEET.
11:30:05PM THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF RS-50 IS 50 FEET SO THIS WOULD
11:30:09PM ALLOW THEM TO DEVELOP AT THAT MINIMUM WIDTH.
11:30:12PM UNDER THE STANDARDS WHICH IS LESS THAN RS-50.
11:30:21PM THIS IS THE ZONING MAP.
11:30:23PM AND THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED HERE.
11:30:25PM WITH THE GREEN STRIPES.
11:30:26PM SO THIS IS OLA AVENUE.
11:30:28PM THIS IS WARREN.
11:30:30PM SO THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OLA AND
11:30:34PM WARREN INTERSECTION.
11:30:35PM IT'S SURROUNDED WITH RESIDENTIAL USE ANNAL TO THE NORTH AND
11:30:39PM TO THE EAST.
11:30:42PM TO THE SOUTH IS VACANT, BUT IT IS RESIDENTIAL IN WIDTH OF
11:30:50PM RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS THE AERIAL FOR THE PROPERTY.
11:30:53PM THIS IS THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED. THIS IS OLA AND THIS
11:30:56PM IS WARREN.
11:31:00PM THEN TO LOON AT THE SITE, AND THE SURROUNDING AREA.
11:31:04PM THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE SITE ON OLA LOOKING WEST.
11:31:10PM THAT'S THE VIEW LOOKING NORTH ON OLA.
11:31:13PM AND THAT'S NORTH OF THE SITE.
11:31:19PM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NORTHEAST ON OLA.
11:31:22PM THIS WILL BE THE VIEW DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE SITE. THIS
11:31:25PM IS EAST OF THE SITE.
11:31:27PM SO THIS IS A SIDE VIEW OF THE STRUCTURE.
11:31:30PM WHICH IS AT THE CORNER OF OLA AND WARREN.
11:31:34PM AND THEN THIS IS A VIEW LOOKING EAST ON WARREN.
11:31:38PM THEN AS WE GO AROUND, WE HAVE THE SOUTHEAST VIEW.
11:31:44PM THAT'S TO THE SOUTHEAST.
11:31:45PM SWING BACK AROUND TO THE SOUTH.
11:31:48PM AND THEN THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
11:31:49PM SO THIS IS FROM THE OPPOSITE STREET, WHICH IS ON HAVANA.
11:31:55PM THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE IT
11:32:00PM CONSISTENT WITH LAND REGULATIONS.
11:32:03PM IN THE EVENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THIS APPLICATION SITE
11:32:06PM PLAN MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
11:32:08PM READING AND THOSE REVISIONS ARE FOUND IN THE STAFF REPORT ON
11:32:13PM PAGE 9.
11:32:14PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
11:32:15PM >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU.
11:32:21PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE THESE SUBJECT TO DESIGN STANDARD, A
11:32:26PM DISTRICT THAT IS DESIGN STANDARD CONTROL?
11:32:30PM >>LACHONE DOCK: THIS REQUEST IS A PD SO IT'S A PLANNED
11:32:33PM DEVELOPMENT.
11:32:34PM SO IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO WHAT IS APPROVED UNDER THE PD
11:32:41PM STANDARD.
11:32:41PM IT'S NOT UNDER RS-50 STANDARDS.
11:32:43PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DOESN'T MEAN THAT.
11:32:44PM I MEANT LIKE TAMPA HEIGHTS DESIGN LOOK, YOU KNOW, THOSE
11:32:48PM TYPES OF STANDARDS?
11:32:49PM >>LACHONE DOCK: NO ADDITIONAL STANDARDS.
11:32:56PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANYONE ELSE?
11:32:58PM THANK YOU, MA'AM.
11:33:00PM PETITIONER, PLEASE.
11:33:03PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO CLOSE.
11:33:04PM OH, I'M SORRY.
11:33:05PM >> NICHOLAS JAMAL.
11:33:16PM I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN IN YET.
11:33:17PM (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK)
11:33:25PM >> I DO.
11:33:25PM >> SO WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANY WAIVERS.
11:33:33PM AND THE PROJECT IS VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING
11:33:36PM AREA.
11:33:37PM AND STAFF HAS FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CODE, SO WE ARE
11:33:52PM RESPECTFULLY ASKING FOR YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT.
11:33:54PM >>LUIS VIERA: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
11:34:00PM MR. DINGFELDER?
11:34:03PM I'M SORRY, ANYONE HEAR IN THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON ITEM 11 AT
11:34:07PM 17 1:BE 31 P.M.? MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
11:34:12PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
11:34:14PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:34:15PM ANYONE OPPOSED?
11:34:16PM OKAY.
11:34:17PM I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE ARE AT.
11:34:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST
11:34:26PM READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
11:34:28PM GENERAL VICINITY OF 2904 NORTH OLA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF
11:34:32PM TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
11:34:34PM FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
11:34:37PM SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
11:34:39PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:34:41PM >>LUIS VIERA: SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:34:43PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:34:44PM ANY OPPOSED? THANK YOU, SIR.
11:34:45PM >> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:34:46PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION TO BE HELD ON JULY 18, 2019 AT
11:34:50PM 9:30 A.M.
11:34:53PM >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT WE GO TO STAFF REPORTS.
11:34:55PM I'M SORRY.
11:35:07PM I APOLOGIZE.
11:35:08PM [OFF MICROPHONE] BY THE WAY, DID YOU WANT TO INTRODUCE
11:35:14PM ANYTHING BEFORE I SPEAK, SIR?
11:35:16PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN.
11:35:18PM FOR THE PURPOSES OF PEOPLE AT HOME THAT MAY NOT KNOW WHAT
11:35:21PM THE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT MATTER IS.
11:35:22PM SO --
11:35:24PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
11:35:31PM >>BILL CARLSON: THE PRESIDENT'S ORDER THAT PROHIBITS PEOPLE
11:35:36PM FROM -- U.S. CITIZENS FROM TRAVELING TO CUBA, WHICH WILL
11:35:40PM HURT -- THE RESOLUTION TALKS ABOUT HOW THAT WILL HURT THE
11:35:45PM PORT AND AIRPORT IN TAMPA WHICH WILL COST JOBS AND HURTS
11:35:48PM CAPITALISM AND ENTREPRENEURS IN CUBA, AND HURTS THE ECONOMIC
11:35:54PM FREEDOM OF THE CUBAN PEOPLE.
11:35:56PM BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY IT TAKES AWAY THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
11:35:58PM OF AMERICANS AND WE OBJECT TO IT.
11:36:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND I AGREE WITH EVERY WORD YOU SAID, SIR.
11:36:05PM I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT OPENNESS WITH CUBA IS NOT ONLY
11:36:08PM ABOUT DOLLARS AND CENTS, IT'S ALSO ABOUT THE PROMOTION OF
11:36:10PM OUR BEST HISTORIC VALUES WHICH YOU ALLUDED TO, IN FREEDOM
11:36:14PM BUT ALSO WITH CIVIL LIBERTIES, AND THE OPENNESS, I REALLY DO
11:36:19PM BELIEVE, AT 11:34 P.M. AT NIGHT, CAN PROMOTE.
11:36:24PM THAT I WROTE A FRIENDLY EDIT.
11:36:27PM IF YOU WISH TO REVISE THAT'S CERTAINLY ALL RIGHT, AFTER THE
11:36:32PM SECTION ON PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS, WHEREAS SUCH CONNECTIONS
11:36:35PM WOULD PROMOTE NOT ONLY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUT PROMOTION OF
11:36:38PM OUR BEST HISTORIC VALUES OF FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IN CUBA.
11:36:41PM IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU ARE COMFORTABLE WITH?
11:36:44PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES, SIR.
11:36:45PM >>LUIS VIERA: I APPRECIATE IT.
11:36:46PM OUT OF CURIOSITY, WHERE DID WE FIND THE 700,000 INDEPENDENT
11:36:50PM BUSINESSES?
11:36:54PM THAT'S A LOT OF BUSINESSES.
11:36:57PM >>BILL CARLSON: IT SAYS -- I FORGOT.
11:37:00PM >>LUIS VIERA: THAT'S FINE.
11:37:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I ASK THE QUESTION LOGISTICALLY, DO
11:37:06PM YOU WANT THIS BROUGHT BACK AT THE WORKSHOP WITH THE CHANGES?
11:37:11PM BECAUSE OTHERWISE -- THE LANGUAGE, WE HAVE TO WITH THAT
11:37:18PM LANGUAGE, HAVE THE CHAIR SIGN IT BEFORE IT TAKES AFFECT.
11:37:24PM >>BILL CARLSON: WE CAN'T JUST ACCEPT HIS SIGNING?
11:37:29PM >>LUIS VIERA: I HAVE MY LITTLE PART, TOO.
11:37:32PM >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU WANT TO ADD YOUR WORDS?
11:37:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, NO, IT HAS TO BE TYPED.
11:37:37PM IT HAS TO BE IN A FORM WHERE IT'S PRESENTED TO THE CLERK.
11:37:41PM IT IS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT LASTS AN ETERNITY.
11:37:45PM AND IT HAS TO BE NUMBERED NUMERICALLY AND IT HAS TO BE IN
11:37:48PM THE PILE THAT YOU SIGN AT SUCH POINT.
11:37:51PM SO IF I KNEW THAT WAS COMING.
11:37:53PM CERTAINLY IT'S COUNCIL'S RESOLUTION.
11:37:55PM MR. CARLSON, COUNCILMAN CARLSON, IF YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION I
11:37:59PM WILL MAKE IT HAPPEN --
11:38:01PM >>LUIS VIERA: I CAN SIGN IT TOMORROW.
11:38:02PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'LL MAKE SURE I WILL NOT LEAVE TONIGHT
11:38:12PM UNTIL THAT LANGUAGE IS ON THE CLERK'S DESK.
11:38:15PM >>CHAIRMAN: SO, IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION, SIR.
11:38:19PM >>BILL CARLSON: I MOVE THE RESOLUTION BE APPROVED.
11:38:21PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
11:38:22PM SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
11:38:25PM A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN I BELIEVE MIRANDA.
11:38:28PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:38:29PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:38:30PM THANK YOU, SIR.
11:38:31PM YES, SIR.
11:38:38PM INFORMATION, COUNCILMAN -- DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING SEPARATE?
11:38:41PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, ANYTHING, SIR?
11:38:43PM COUNCILMAN GUDES?
11:38:46PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION TO GIVE A
11:38:52PM COMMENDATION TO MR. LEVI FLEMING, AN ADVOCATE IN DISTRICT 5.
11:38:56PM I WILL PRESENT THIS COMMENDATION TO MR. FLEMING AT A REGULAR
11:39:00PM SESSION OF COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 27.
11:39:01PM >> SECOND.
11:39:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECOND BY
11:39:07PM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:39:09PM ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED?
11:39:11PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE
11:39:15PM 2011-48 FROM THE JUNE 20th AGENDA.
11:39:18PM IT WAS A PRESENTATION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING.
11:39:25PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
11:39:25PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT FILE MAY NOT --
11:39:31PM >> THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WAS GOING TO COME AND TALK ABOUT
11:39:33PM THE TRIM NOTICES.
11:39:35PM AND I JUST REMOVED IT.
11:39:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
11:39:38PM MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
11:39:40PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR?
11:39:43PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:39:43PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEN IN PLACE OF THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO
11:39:47PM HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION, NO MORE THAN TEN MINUTES, SENATOR
11:39:52PM RODRIGUEZ FROM PUERTO RICO, WANTED TO ADDRESS COUNCIL.
11:39:55PM >>LUIS VIERA: BEFORE WE DO THAT, AND THAT CERTAINLY IS OF
11:40:01PM VALUE.
11:40:02PM JUST TO LET YOU KNOW I WAS GOING TO SAY THIS ON THE
11:40:04PM 20th, IF YOU ALL TAKE A LOOK AT THE CALENDAR, I'LL BE
11:40:08PM HONEST WITH YOU AS A NEW CHAIR, I NEVER REALLY PAID
11:40:11PM ATTENTION TO THINGS LIKE THIS.
11:40:12PM AND I CERTAINLY WANT TO HAVE THIS GENTLEMAN HERE BECAUSE
11:40:14PM THAT'S A WONDERFUL THING.
11:40:17PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I TOOK OFF THE ONE THAT I AM REPLACING
11:40:20PM IT.
11:40:21PM >>LUIS VIERA: AND I AGREE.
11:40:22PM I WOULD ASK YOU, WE HAVE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 INCLUDING THAT
11:40:29PM PRESENTATIONS, PLUS THEN THE FRONT PORCH, THE ORDINANCE,
11:40:33PM PLUS AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
11:40:35PM AND WE HAVE TO BE DONE BY 1:30.
11:40:39PM WHAT I WOULD ASK IS THAT EVERYONE -- AND LOOK, LOTS OF
11:40:45PM COMMENDATIONS.
11:40:46PM IT'S JUST UNFORTUNATELY -- AND THIS IS MY ERROR AS CHAIR --
11:40:48PM WE HAVE A LOT.
11:40:49PM AND IF THEY ALL GO, THAT'S GREAT, GOD BLESS 'EM, LET'S DO
11:40:53PM IT.
11:40:53PM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:40:55PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I CAN HELP.
11:40:56PM I'LL DEFER THE FRONT PORCH REPORT, STAFF REPORT TO ANOTHER
11:41:00PM DATE.
11:41:00PM THERE'S NO URGENCY.
11:41:02PM >>LUIS VIERA: THAT TAKES CARE OF IT.
11:41:03PM THANK YOU, SIR.
11:41:06PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GIVE ME AN ALTERNATIVE DATE, MR. SHELBY.
11:41:18PM >>LUIS VIERA: AUGUST WE ARE PRETTY WELL DARNED PACKED AS
11:41:20PM WELL, I THINK.
11:41:21PM >> SEPTEMBER 26th.
11:41:26PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:41:27PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:41:29PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:41:30PM ANY OPPOSED? OKAY.
11:41:31PM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, DO YOU HAVE A SECOND ON THIS MOTION?
11:41:34PM MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
11:41:36PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:41:39PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:41:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN GUDES, IS DIANE HART DOING ALL
11:41:47PM RIGHT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?
11:41:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHEN I SAW HER THIS MORNING, SHE'S A
11:41:51PM LITTLE BIT BETTER.
11:41:53PM >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA?
11:41:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WASN'T GOING TO PUT ANYTHING, BUT I
11:42:01PM REMEMBER TWO THINGS.
11:42:01PM JESUIT BOYS WON A STATE BASEBALL CHAMPIONSHIP AND
11:42:07PM UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA WON DIVISION 2 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP.
11:42:10PM I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENDATION TO BOTH OF THEM AT A
11:42:13PM LATER DATE.
11:42:15PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
11:42:18PM SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR?
11:42:21PM OPPOSED?
11:42:21PM ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
11:42:24PM >>BILL CARLSON: WE SET UP AFTER YOU LEFT LAST TIME, MR.
11:42:28PM CHAIR, WE SET UP A CONVERSATION BUT I THINK WE SCHEDULED IT
11:42:33PM ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS MONTH WHEN I AM OUT OF TOWN.
11:42:36PM AND WE HAVE BEEN HAVING FEEDBACK TO THE SCOOTER COMPANIES
11:42:42PM AND THEY SAY THEY ARE WORKING CLOSELY WITH STAFF TO RECTIFY
11:42:45PM SOME OF THE PROBLEMS BASED ON FEEDBACK AND IT WOULD BE
11:42:47PM BETTER IF WE COULD SCHEDULE IT IN AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER TO
11:42:49PM GIVE THEM MORE TIME TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES.
11:42:52PM >>LUIS VIERA: DO WE HAVE TIME IN JULY?
11:43:08PM >>BILL CARLSON: I SORT OF MOVE THAT WE MOVE THE DATE.
11:43:12PM >>LUIS VIERA: TO BE DETERMINED.
11:43:14PM >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
11:43:19PM >>LUIS VIERA: SCOOTERS.
11:43:22PM >>BILL CARLSON: I THINK I SAID THE LAST THURSDAY, THE
11:43:25PM 27th.
11:43:35PM HOW ABOUT TOWARD THE END OF JULY?
11:43:39PM WHEN DO WE HAVE TIME IN LATE JULY OR AUGUST?
11:43:43PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S A STAFF REPORT, IT'S NOT A WORKSHOP.
11:43:45PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU HAVE A JULY MEETING.
11:43:49PM I'M SORRY.
11:43:50PM ON THE 18th OF JULY.
11:43:51PM YOUR NEXT MEETING AFTER THAT IS AUGUST 1st.
11:43:59PM >>BILL CARLSON: IS AUGUST 1st OKAY?
11:44:00PM OKAY.
11:44:01PM AUGUST 1st.
11:44:03PM >>LUIS VIERA: SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
11:44:04PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:44:05PM OPPOSED?
11:44:06PM ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
11:44:08PM AND I JUST WANT TO WISH, IF I MAY, EVERYONE A HAPPY FATHER'S
11:44:12PM DAY.
11:44:12PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT BUT I
11:44:17PM DID NOTICE THAT THE CALENDAR HAS THE MAYOR'S BUDGET
11:44:20PM PRESENTATION ON AUGUST 1st, BUT IT HAS AN UNKNOWN TIME.
11:44:24PM TRADITIONALLY IT'S 9 A.M.
11:44:25PM WOULD YOU LIKE TO CORRECT THE CALENDAR TO HAVE THAT REFLECT
11:44:28PM 9 A.M. ON AUGUST 1st?
11:44:31PM >>LUIS VIERA: SHALL WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THAT?
11:44:40PM OH, I'M SORRY.
11:44:43PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAD A COMMENT ON THAT.
11:44:44PM >>LUIS VIERA: GO AHEAD, SIR.
11:44:46PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I JUST WANTED TO -- I HAVE ASKED STAFF
11:44:49PM THIS ALREADY, BUT MAYBE JUST CODIFY IT HERE.
11:44:52PM THAT WHEN THE MAYOR MAKES HER PRESENTATION, OF COURSE THAT'S
11:45:00PM HER PREROGATIVE, BUT JUST A REQUEST FROM COUNCIL THAT SENIOR
11:45:03PM STAFF REMAIN TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
11:45:06PM APPARENTLY, THERE'S BEEN SOME CONFUSION ON THAT IN THE PAST.
11:45:10PM SO IF AS A BODY WE COULD MAKE THAT REQUEST, FORMALIZE THAT
11:45:15PM REQUEST TO ADD TO THAT MOTION, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE
11:45:21PM MAYOR LEAVE HER SENIOR STAFF BEHIND TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
11:45:24PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
11:45:26PM WE HAVE A MOTION I GUESS BY COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, A SECOND
11:45:29PM BY WHO?
11:45:35PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOTION TO TIME CERTAIN AT 9 A.M. ON THAT
11:45:38PM DATE.
11:45:40PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: AUGUST 1st, 2019, THE MAYOR'S FISCAL
11:45:43PM YEAR 2020 BUDGET PRESENTATION TO BE SET FOR 9 A.M.
11:45:49PM >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THEN TAG ON MY RESPECTFULLY ALSO
11:45:52PM REQUEST THAT THE MAYOR LEAVE HER SENIOR STAFF BEHIND TO
11:45:55PM ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
11:45:56PM >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY.
11:46:00PM WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
11:46:02PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:46:03PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:46:07PM OKAY, MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE?
11:46:09PM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE WITH.
11:46:10PM I DON'T KNOW BY WHOM.
11:46:12PM SECOND BY WHOM.
11:46:13PM ALL IN FAVOR?
11:46:13PM ANY OPPOSED?
11:46:17PM THERE YOU GO.
11:46:18PM THANK YOU.
11:46:18PM >> WE ARE ADJOURNED?
11:46:23PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, WE ARE ADJOURNED.
11:46:24PM THANK YOU TO ALL OF STAFF FOR WAITING AROUND.
11:46:29PM
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.