Tampa City Council
Thursday, June 4, 2020
5:01 p.m. Session
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
17:02:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE.
17:02:47 I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER.
17:02:52 IF I CAN HAVE ROLL CALL PLEASE.
17:02:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
17:02:52 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
17:02:52 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
17:02:52 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
17:02:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
17:02:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
17:03:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
17:03:04 ITEM -- MAY I HAVE --
17:03:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE OPENING OF PUBLIC HEARING.
17:03:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND
17:03:17 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
17:03:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I CAN MAKE A MOTION BY THE PLANNING
17:03:21 COMMISSION.
17:03:25 MOTION SETTING PLAN AMENDMENT ADOPTION HEARING FOR
17:03:45 TA/CPA 20-1, TA/CPA 20-03, TA/CPA 20-05, TA/CPA 20-06,
17:04:05 TAC 20-07, TA/CPA 20-08, TAC 20-09, AND TA/CPA 20-10.
17:04:09 AND A PLAN AMENDMENT TRANSMITTAL HEARING FOR TAC/PA
17:04:15 20-02 AND TA/CPA 20-04.
17:04:22 ON THE EVENING OF JULY 30, 2020 AT 5:01 P.M.
17:04:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:04:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CITRO AND
17:04:34 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:04:38 ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:04:44 IS THE MICROPHONE ON OVER THERE?
17:04:47 GO AHEAD.
17:04:50 >> I AM SPEAKING AND I DON'T HEAR --
17:04:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OVER -- THE TABLE-TOP ONE.
17:04:55 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:04:57 I AM NEW AT THIS.
17:04:59 MICHELE OGLIVIE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:05:05 I'M HERE TO PRESENT THE ADOPTION OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT
17:05:06 19-13.
17:05:10 IF I MAY JUST PUT THIS ON THE ELMO.
17:05:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, IF WE CAN REDIRECT THE
17:05:16 CAMERA TO THE OVERHEAD PROJECTOR THAT WE HAVE ON THE
17:05:23 TABLE.
17:05:27 >>MICHELE OGILVIE: AS YOU SEE ON THE ELMO, WE HAVE A
17:05:30 REQUEST FOR NEW OBJECTIVE AND POLICY IN THE TAMPA
17:05:34 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THE SUPPORT AND
17:05:36 ENCOURAGEMENT OF HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES DURING THE
17:05:40 UPDATE OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:05:44 WE WOULD INVESTIGATE THE COMMON SETS OF TERMS INCLUSIVE
17:05:49 OF AGING, DISABILITY, SAFETY, ACCESS TO JOBS, SCHOOLS,
17:05:52 HEALTH CARE, HEALTHY FOOD AND RECREATION.
17:05:57 AND ALSO TO SUPPORT COMPLETE STREETS, COMPLETE
17:06:00 NEIGHBORHOODS, HEALTH FOOD SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL
17:06:02 HEALTH BASED ON EVIDENCE.
17:06:06 AS YOU RECALL AND IT HAS BEEN A VERY LONG TIME EARLIER
17:06:11 THIS YEAR, WE CAME TO YOU WITH THE EVIDENCE THAT WE
17:06:14 HAVE BEEN COLLECTING OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS THROUGH
17:06:22 A HEALTH ATLAS -- MAYBE I SHOULD SHOW IT.
17:06:40 SHOWING EVIDENCE THAT IN OUR AREAS OF LOW INCOME, IN
17:06:44 PARTICULAR, WE HAVE WHAT'S KNOWN AS "FOOD DESERTS," AND
17:06:48 THAT HEALTH AND FOOD ACCESS ARE COMBINED THAT WE HAVE
17:06:56 POOR OUTCOMES FROM TRANSPORTATION DATA AND FROM HEALTH,
17:06:59 INCLUDING CHRONIC DISEASES.
17:07:01 THAT THEY ARE ALL COMBINED.
17:07:03 WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THIS AND COMING FORWARD WITH
17:07:08 THIS RECOMMENDATION SO THAT WE CAN CHANGE THE FUTURE OF
17:07:11 MANY OF THE RESIDENTS IN OUR COMMUNITY.
17:07:18 THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS DID REVIEW AND HAD
17:07:22 NO COMMENTS ON THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
17:07:27 WE ARE CONSISTENT, ONCE MORE, WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE
17:07:31 ELEMENT ENSURING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC HEALTH, MOBILITY
17:07:34 ELEMENTS, SEVERAL POLICIES WHICH SPEAK TO PROMOTING
17:07:41 SAFE MOBILITY, ENCOURAGING IMPROVED AIR QUALITY,
17:07:44 STIMULATING THE ECONOMY.
17:07:46 OTHER POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT THIS
17:07:50 WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE AND CONSISTENT WITH WOULD INCLUDE
17:07:55 ENHANCING NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY, SUSTAINING TAMPA AS A
17:07:57 HEALTHY VITAL CITY, ENCOURAGING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
17:08:01 TO HAVE PLACES WHERE THEY CAN HAVE SOME FUN, INCLUDING
17:08:04 COMMUNITY GARDENS.
17:08:08 AND SO OUR RECOMMENDATION CONTINUES TO BE CONSISTENCY
17:08:11 WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WE HOPE YOU WILL
17:08:13 APPROVE THIS REQUEST.
17:08:15 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:08:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
17:08:17 ANY QUESTIONS?
17:08:19 SEEING NONE?
17:08:22 ANYONE FROM PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
17:08:25 SEEING NONE.
17:08:26 MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:08:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION.
17:08:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
17:08:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION WITH COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND
17:08:36 COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECOND.
17:08:39 >> I MOVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING OF
17:08:46 CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE
17:08:52 OF 2.3 AND POLICY 2.3.1 OF HEALTH AND ALL WHEREBY
17:08:56 DECISION-MAKERS CAN CONSIDER HOW PLANS AND POLICY ALSO
17:09:01 IMPACT HUMAN HEALTH OF APPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND
17:09:08 SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:09:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
17:09:18 >>DAVID HEY: MR. CHAIRMAN --
17:09:21 >> EXCUSE ME, ANNOUNCE THE VOTE.
17:09:25 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND SECOND READING
17:09:28 JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:09:32 >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:09:36 THE NEXT ITEM FOR YOUR REVIEW IS AN ADOPTION HEARING
17:09:38 FUTURE LAND USE 19-16.
17:09:42 IF WE CAN HAVE THE POWER ELMO.
17:09:46 THE TRADITIONAL USE-24 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY WAS
17:09:49 CREATED TO RECOGNIZE THOSE UNIQUE AREAS OF THE CITY
17:09:53 THAT ALLOW -- THAT ALREADY HAD AN EXISTING PATTERN OF
17:09:58 INDUSTRIAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND COMMERCIAL USES ALL MIXED
17:09:59 IN.
17:10:02 THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED DEFINITIONS HAD RECOGNIZED THESE
17:10:08 AREAS AS INDUSTRIAL IN CHARACTER, AND DISCHARGED PLAN
17:10:11 AMENDMENTS TO TRANSITIONAL USE-24.
17:10:15 IN 2018, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DID CONDUCT A
17:10:18 LAND USE ANALYSIS OF THAT TRANSITIONAL USE 24, IT
17:10:21 IDENTIFIED SEVEN UNIQUE AREAS OF THE CITY WHERE THE
17:10:22 LAND USE IS PRESENT.
17:10:25 THE STUDY IDENTIFIED THAT THE MAJORITY OF PARCELS ARE
17:10:28 NONRESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER, EITHER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR
17:10:33 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY COMMERCIAL USES, EXCUSE ME, A
17:10:37 LOT OF CAR LOTS AND CAR REPAIRS.
17:10:42 THE PROPOSAL IS TO PROHIBIT FUTURE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO
17:10:44 THAT TU-24.
17:10:48 WE HAD A NUMBER OF PEOPLE COME TO THE PLANNING
17:10:51 COMMISSION ASKING THAT CATEGORY.
17:10:56 AND STAFF FELT THAT THERE WOULD BE LANGUAGE IN THE PLAN
17:11:01 IN LINE WITH THE STAFF -- THE HISTORIC STAFF
17:11:03 INTERPRETATION OF HOW THE LAND USE CATEGORY IS TO BE
17:11:04 IMPLEMENTED.
17:11:07 IT DOES ALSO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL POLICY GUIDANCE WHEN
17:11:14 YOUR REZONING POLICY AND PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL USES.
17:11:16 THE POLICIES WOULD ALSO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
17:11:20 STAFF TO WORK WITH EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS TO
17:11:24 RECOMMEND ONLY OTHER LAND USE CATEGORIES THAT WOULD
17:11:30 BETTER FIT THEIR -- THEIR PROPERTY.
17:11:33 IT IS -- IT IS NOT MANDATORY.
17:11:37 IT IS ONLY WHEN THE APPLICANT SEEKS OUR ADVICE.
17:11:40 THE CITY'S LONG-TERM GOAL THOUGH IS TO REDUCE OR
17:11:44 ELIMINATE THE PREVALENCE OF THAT TU-24 FUTURE LAND USE
17:11:46 CATEGORY.
17:11:50 BASED ON THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND IT
17:11:51 CONSISTENT.
17:11:52 THERE ARE POLICY DIRECTIONS DEALING WITH THE
17:11:56 DISCOURAGEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL USES BEING
17:11:57 LOCATED NEXT TO EACH OTHER.
17:12:04 AND THEN THERE WAS ALSO A POLICIES DEALING -- NEXT.
17:12:07 PROMOTION OF COMPATIBLE USES.
17:12:09 WE HAVE HAD ISSUES IN THE PAST WHERE INDUSTRIAL --
17:12:13 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ARE LOCATED VERY CLOSE
17:12:15 TO EACH -- EACH OTHER IN THIS CATEGORY.
17:12:20 AND IT WOULD ALSO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND
17:12:21 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE CITY.
17:12:25 SO BASED ON THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS
17:12:28 RECOMMENDING THAT IT -- THAT IT BE FOUND CONSISTENT AND
17:12:30 NO ISSUES FROM THE STATE.
17:12:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:12:35 ANY COUNCILMEMBERS WITH ANY QUESTIONS?
17:12:37 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
17:12:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:12:43 TWO THINGS, DAVID, ONE YOU HAVE -- YOU MENTIONED SEVEN
17:12:46 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS.
17:12:49 DO YOU HAVE A MAP OF THAT?
17:12:51 >>DAVID HEY: I DON'T HAVE A MAP.
17:12:56 THEY ARE PREDOMINANTLY IN EAST TAMPA, RIGHT AROUND
17:12:57 39TH.
17:12:58 THERE IS A SEGMENT.
17:13:01 THERE IS SOME UP -- IT IS MOSTLY IN EAST TAMPA.
17:13:05 THERE IS A SMALL SEGMENT DOWN IN SOUTH TAMPA NEAR THE
17:13:09 RAILROAD TRACKS, BUT THE PREDOMINANT IS EAST.
17:13:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW WE HAVE RUN INTO A FEW OF
17:13:17 THEM IN THE REZONING CONTEXT OVER THE LAST SIX TO NINE
17:13:17 MONTHS.
17:13:21 >>DAVID HEY: YEAH, IN SOUTH TAMPA.
17:13:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF, AS PLANNERS, IF YOU GUYS HAVE
17:13:26 RECOGNIZED THAT PERHAPS IT IS NOT THE GREATEST CATEGORY
17:13:29 IN THE WORLD, EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR A LONG
17:13:30 TIME.
17:13:34 WHY DIDN'T WE JUST RECOMMEND PLAN AMENDMENTS TO CHANGE
17:13:37 THE CATEGORY TO SOMETHING DIFFERENT OR MORE
17:13:39 APPROPRIATE?
17:13:40 >>DAVID HEY: WELL, I THINK FOR PLANNING COMMISSION
17:13:44 STAFF, YOU KNOW, THESE PROPERTY OWNERS ALREADY HAVE
17:13:48 PARTICULAR RIGHTS WITH THE LAND USE CATEGORY THAT THEY
17:13:50 HAVE.
17:13:54 AND I THINK STAFF FELT UNCOMFORTABLE RECOMMENDING THE
17:13:59 REMOVAL OF SOME OF THOSE RIGHTS, BECAUSE ALL THE OTHER
17:14:03 LAND USE CATEGORIES WOULD -- WOULD TAKE AWAY SOMETHING
17:14:07 THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE, LIKE, FOR INSTANCE, IF YOU ARE
17:14:12 DEALING WITH A SITE THAT IS BUILT AT RESIDENTIAL, BUT
17:14:17 THAT PERSON LONG TERM MAY WANT A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE,
17:14:20 IF THE CITY WENT IN THERE AND REMOVED THE LAND USE TO
17:14:26 REMOVE THE INDUSTRIAL, THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED, I
17:14:29 WOULD THINK, A TAKING FOR THE POTENTIAL THERE.
17:14:32 IT JUST -- IT USUALLY CAUSES ISSUES.
17:14:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
17:14:38 LAST QUESTION, MISS WELLS, MAYBE YOU CAN HELP ME IN
17:14:39 THAT REGARD.
17:14:43 BECAUSE I RECALL -- I RECALL PERIODICALLY WHEN WE DO
17:14:47 COMP PLAN UPDATES THAT SOMETIMES WE GO IN AND WHOLESALE
17:14:51 CHANGE CATEGORIES AND THIS SORT OF THING.
17:14:55 IN THE PAST I DON'T THINK WE WORRIED ABOUT TAKINGS IN
17:14:56 THE LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:15:00 I MEAN, WHEN WE ARE TALKING OF COMP PLAN AND LAND USE
17:15:03 AS COMPARED TO -- I UNDERSTAND WHEN SOMEBODY HAS A
17:15:06 ZONING CATEGORY, IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE STRONGER, BUT
17:15:08 CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.
17:15:10 >>CATE WELLS: I THINK WITH THIS AMENDMENT IT WOULD
17:15:14 MAKE IT EASIER TO DO WHOLESALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS
17:15:17 SINCE WE ARE ENCOURAGING THAT USE AND ENCOURAGING
17:15:20 PEOPLE NOT TO STAY WITH THAT LAND USE DESIGNATION.
17:15:24 I THINK THAT WOULD UPDATE THAT EFFORT INSTEAD OF TU-24
17:15:27 ON THE BOOKS AND ALLOWED TO SUPPORT SO MANY DIFFERENT
17:15:30 USES AND GIVING PROPERTY OWNERS THAT FLEXIBILITY TO
17:15:34 DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT AS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
17:15:39 I ACTUALLY THINK THIS AMENDMENT WOULD SUPPORT THAT
17:15:44 EFFORT IN INITIATING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THOSE
17:15:47 PROPERTIES THAT STILL HAVE THAT DESIGNATION.
17:15:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORT OF A SHOT ACROSS THE BOW THAT
17:15:52 SOMETHING WILL BE COMING DOWN THE ROAD?
17:15:56 >>CATE WELLS: PUTS PROPERTIES OWNER ON NOTICE THAT
17:15:59 THIS FUTURE LAND USE IS NOT SUPPORTED.
17:16:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, BOTH.
17:16:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:16:04 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
17:16:07 SEEING NONE, ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON
17:16:10 THIS ITEM?
17:16:13 A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:16:17 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:16:20 COUNCILMAN GUDES, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ITEM NUMBER
17:16:20 TWO.
17:16:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, CHAIR.
17:16:27 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA
17:16:29 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, LAND USE
17:16:38 OBJECTIVE 8.1 THROUGH 8.13.3 OF ADDITIONAL POLICY
17:16:43 DIRECTION CURRENTLY DESIGNATED TRANSITIONAL USE-24 AND
17:16:47 PROHIBIT ANY EXPANSION OF THE TRANSITIONAL USE 24
17:16:48 CATEGORY.
17:16:54 REMEMBERING EXISTING LAND USE POLICY 8.13 AS 8.14,
17:16:59 RENUMBERING EXISTING LAND USE POLICIES 8.14 AS 8.15
17:17:03 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT,
17:17:08 PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:17:09 >> A MOTION AND SECOND.
17:17:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
17:17:15 ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
17:17:16 ANY OPPOSED?
17:17:20 ALL RIGHT, SO WE MOVE -- GO AHEAD AND READ IT.
17:17:22 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:17:26 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION HELD ON JUNE 25 AT 9:30.
17:17:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:17:31 SO ITEM NUMBER 3.
17:17:33 AND ITEMS 5-11.
17:17:39 WE CAN HEAR THEM ALL TOGETHER IN A BULK PACKAGE BUT
17:17:42 READ THEM BY TITLE INDIVIDUALLY.
17:17:45 WHAT IT IS -- AND FURTHER EXPLANATION.
17:17:48 EXISTING PARKS THROUGHOUT THE CITY CHANGING THEM TO
17:17:52 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
17:17:55 BASICALLY -- WE HAVE DONE THIS BEFORE, WHERE IT
17:17:57 PROTECTS EXISTING PARKS FROM FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS.
17:17:58 GO AHEAD.
17:18:02 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD AFTERNOON, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR
17:18:03 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:18:06 THE NEXT EIGHT ITEMS ARE ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR
17:18:09 THOSE PARKS.
17:18:13 THESE ARE PARKS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
17:18:17 THERE ARE ALSO 1907 E IS SULPHUR SPRINGS WHICH IS NOT
17:18:19 ON THAT MAP.
17:18:20 NEXT.
17:18:22 A LITTLE BACKGROUND WORK.
17:18:24 THIS WAS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL.
17:18:27 EACH PARK IS LISTED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA'S DEDICATED
17:18:31 PARK LIST AND ALL SITES WOULD BE RECOGNIZED TO THAT
17:18:34 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE.
17:18:37 AND YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND IT CONSISTENT
17:18:42 WITH YOUR EXISTING POLICIES REGARDING RECREATION/OPEN
17:18:43 SPACE.
17:18:48 SO FIRST WE WILL DO 19-07E, SULPHUR SPRINGS PARK.
17:18:51 AND WE WILL JUST -- AGAIN, THIS PARK WAS IN FRONT OF
17:18:55 YOU BEFORE AS A PARTIAL, BUT IT CAME BACK AS A WHOLE
17:18:58 DUE TO SOME LEGAL ISSUES.
17:19:01 SO THE ENTIRE PARK WOULD GO TO THAT RECREATION/OPEN
17:19:03 SPACE.
17:19:06 AS YOU CAN SEE.
17:19:07 NEXT.
17:19:12 AND THEN IT WOULD REMOVE THE POTENTIAL FOR 25 DWELLING
17:19:15 UNITS FOR THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE.
17:19:19 NEXT IS ITEM -- LET'S KEEP THIS STRAIGHT.
17:19:23 ITEM 5 IS WATER WORKS PARK.
17:19:25 IT IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA AND TAMPA HEIGHTS.
17:19:31 WE ALL KNOW IT -- RIGHT WHERE ULALES IS.
17:19:34 RIGHT NOW A ORIGINAL MIXED USE 100 FUTURE LAND USE
17:19:39 CATEGORY AND GO TO THAT RECREATION/OPEN SPACE.
17:19:43 AGAIN, IT REMOVES THE POTENTIAL FOR 371 UNITS FOR
17:19:47 565,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL.
17:19:49 AND THAT'S NUMBER 5.
17:19:57 ON TO NUMBER 6, THIS IS 19-14B, DESOTO PARK IN THE
17:19:59 PALMETTO BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:20:00 WE CAN SEE THE AERIAL THERE.
17:20:04 HALF THE PARK IS ALREADY REC OPEN SPACE.
17:20:09 THE EASTERN HALF IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 35.
17:20:12 AND THE WHOLE PARK WOULD GO TO THE REC OPEN SPACE.
17:20:18 AGAIN IT REMOVES THE POTENTIAL OF 224 UNITS OR 75,000
17:20:19 SQUARE FEET.
17:20:24 NEXT ON TO ITEM 7, CYPRESS POINT PARK OVER IN THE
17:20:26 WESTSHORE PLANNING DISTRICT.
17:20:29 YOU CAN SEE THE AERIAL.
17:20:33 THIS IS JUST SOUTH OF THE AIRPORT.
17:20:37 THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS ALREADY REC OPEN SPACE.
17:20:40 IT IS HARD TO SEE, BUT THERE ARE A FEW AIRPORT
17:20:44 COMPATIBILITY PORTIONS OF THE PARK.
17:20:50 AND IT WOULD BRING IT ALL TO THE REC OPEN SPACE.
17:20:53 NEXT.
17:20:57 AND SINCE IT IS IN THAT AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY, THERE IS
17:21:00 NO RESIDENTIAL, BUT REMOVE THE POTENTIAL FOR UP TO
17:21:05 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL.
17:21:08 ALL RIGHT ON TO ITEM 8.
17:21:12 IT'S 19-14D.
17:21:17 BOBBY HICKS PARK IN THE TAMPA DISTRICT THE GANDY SOUTH
17:21:18 NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:21:21 YOU COULD SEE IT IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY
17:21:22 DETACHED.
17:21:26 THE MAJORITY OF THE PARK IS WET.
17:21:31 THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PARK IS ALSO A REC OPEN
17:21:36 SPACE, THAT NORTHERN PORTION ON WEST BAY AVENUE IS
17:21:37 RESIDENTIAL-10.
17:21:39 THIS PLAN AMENDMENT WOULD REMOVE THAT.
17:21:44 SO THE WHOLE PARK WOULD BE REC/OPEN SPACE.
17:21:49 REMOVES 78 UNITS OR 119,000 SQUARE FEET OF
17:21:49 NONRESIDENTIAL.
17:21:57 ON TO SITE E, ITEM 9, 19-14E, GADSDEN PARK IN SOUTH
17:22:00 TAMPA DISTRICT IN THE INTERBAY NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:22:04 THIS IS JUST NORTH OF MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE.
17:22:07 THERE IS A LARGE WET AREA ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE
17:22:08 PARK.
17:22:15 THAT IS THE PORTION THAT HAS THAT RESIDENTIAL-6 FUTURE
17:22:15 LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:22:18 AND UNDER THIS PROPOSAL, THAT WOULD ALSO GO TO THE
17:22:20 REC/OPEN SPACE.
17:22:25 DUE TO ITS SIZE, IT REMOVES THE POTENTIAL FOR 209 UNITS
17:22:29 OR -- I DON'T KNOW IF THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS CORRECT.
17:22:35 BUT REMOVES SOME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
17:22:43 AND NEXT REED PARK WHICH IS 10, ITEM 10, IN THE TAMPA
17:22:47 CENTRAL PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
17:22:49 URBAN VILLAGE.
17:22:51 HERE YOU CAN SEE IT IS RIGHT ALONG THE HILLSBOROUGH
17:22:54 RIVER.
17:23:02 IT'S R-35 -- ARE-20, EXCUSE ME -- R-20 CURRENTLY AND
17:23:06 TURN THE PACK INTO THAT REC/OPEN SPACE.
17:23:08 OTHER PARK ON THE RIVER.
17:23:11 I WILL MOVE THE POTENTIAL FOR 105 UNITS OR 114,000
17:23:13 SQUARE FEET.
17:23:19 AND THEN WE ARE ON TO SITE G, WHICH IS ITEM 11.
17:23:24 RIVER CREST PARK IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
17:23:27 DISTRICT, THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
17:23:29 IT IS RIGHT ALONG THE RIVER SO WE ARE SAVING ANOTHER
17:23:32 PARK ALONG THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER.
17:23:36 RIGHT NOW A PORTION IS THAT REC/OPEN SPACE AND THE
17:23:40 SOUTHERN PORTION IS THE RESIDENTIAL-10, AND THIS WOULD
17:23:44 REMOVE THE RES-10 SO THE WHOLE PARK WOULD BE
17:23:46 RECOGNIZED.
17:23:50 45 UNITS WOULD BE -- THE POTENTIAL FOR 45 UNITS WILL BE
17:23:55 REMOVED WORTH 68,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL.
17:23:57 AND THAT'S IT.
17:23:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:24:02 THAT COVERS THOSE ITEMS.
17:24:04 ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANY COUNCILMEMBERS
17:24:06 REGARDING ANY OF THESE?
17:24:08 NOPE?
17:24:11 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEMS 3 AND
17:24:13 THEN 5-11?
17:24:14 SEEING NONE.
17:24:16 A MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:24:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
17:24:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:24:25 >> MOTION AND SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
17:24:32 DINGFELDER, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 3.
17:24:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WILL BE GLAD TO, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:24:38 AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
17:24:42 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
17:24:47 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 713 EAST BIRD STREET OTHERWISE
17:24:53 KNOWN AS SULPHUR SPRINGS PARK FROM COMMERCIAL-35 TO
17:24:58 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL
17:25:01 ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
17:25:03 PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:25:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY DINGFELDER.
17:25:11 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:25:14 ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
17:25:17 >> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:25:19 HELD JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:25:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:25:29 ITEM NUMBER COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
17:25:32 >>BILL CARLSON: FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE OF THE
17:25:36 IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE
17:25:41 ORDINANCE, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AT 1812 OTHERWISE KNOWN
17:25:46 AS WATER WORKS PARK FOR RELATIONAL MIX US USE TO
17:25:52 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, RO/S PROVIDING FOR REPEAL AND
17:25:56 ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR
17:25:58 EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:25:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:26:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
17:26:03 ANY OPPOSED.
17:26:07 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:26:10 ADOPTION HELD JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:26:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:26:16 COUNCILMAN CITRO, YOU ITEM NUMBER 6.
17:26:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO: PA19-14B, ADOPTION FOR THE IMAGINE
17:26:27 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,
17:26:30 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
17:26:35 AT 26 15 EAST CORRINE STREET AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
17:26:41 DESOTO PARK FROM RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING
17:26:49 FOR APPEAL OF AWED ORDINANCES -- OPEN SPACE R/OS,
17:26:52 RESIDENTIAL-35, R-35, WATER AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LI TO
17:26:58 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
17:27:03 ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
17:27:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FOR COUNCILMAN CITRO WITH
17:27:09 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:27:13 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:27:16 JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:27:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:27:22 IF YOU TAKE ITEM NUMBER 7.
17:27:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FILE NO. PA19-14C, AMENDING THE
17:27:31 IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE
17:27:34 ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED
17:27:39 AT 5520 WEST CYPRESS STREET, AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
17:27:43 CYPRESS POINT PARK FROM MUNICIPAL AIRPORT M-AP AND
17:27:50 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE
17:27:56 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
17:27:58 PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
17:27:59 A SECOND.
17:28:00 >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND.
17:28:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
17:28:04 ALL IN FAVOR.
17:28:05 AYE.
17:28:05 OPPOSED.
17:28:09 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:28:13 JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:28:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA, TAKE ITEM NUMBER
17:28:16 8.
17:28:19 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, MR. CHAIR.
17:28:23 FIRST READING CONSIDERATION AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040
17:28:27 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,
17:28:30 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
17:28:35 4120 WEST MANGO AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 BOBBY HICKS
17:28:42 PARK RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE R/OS OF RECREATIONAL OPEN
17:28:50 SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN
17:28:51 EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:28:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
17:28:55 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
17:28:57 ALL IN FAVOR, ANY OPPOSED.
17:28:59 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:29:04 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:29:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:29:09 COUNCILMAN GUDES, ITEM NUMBER 9.
17:29:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE
17:29:17 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,
17:29:19 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
17:29:24 6901 SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
17:29:28 GADSDEN PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL-10, RESIDENTIAL-6, AND
17:29:35 RECREATION/OPEN SPACE, R/OS TO PROVIDE REPEAL FOR ALL
17:29:39 ORDINANCES FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
17:29:39 DATE.
17:29:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:29:44 A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN
17:29:47 MIRANDA.
17:29:49 ANY OPPOSED?
17:29:54 >>CLERK: SECOND READING JUNE 25 AT 9:30 APP.
17:30:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 10.
17:30:02 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
17:30:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: READ FOR FIRST READING THE IMAGINE
17:30:11 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,
17:30:15 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY 4300 RIVERSIDE
17:30:20 DRIVE AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS REED PARK HAVE RESIDENTIAL
17:30:24 20 TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDING FOR REPEAL,
17:30:26 ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT.
17:30:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN
17:30:28 DINGFELDER.
17:30:30 A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:30:32 ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
17:30:35 ALL RIGHT, ANY OPPOSED?
17:30:35 NO.
17:30:37 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:30:41 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JUNE 25 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:30:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:30:46 COUNCILMAN, WILL YOU MIND TAKING NUMBER 11.
17:30:51 >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE FILE NO. PA19-14G, ORDINANCE FOR
17:30:55 FIRST READING AND CONSIDERATION AMENDING THE IMAGINE
17:30:58 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,
17:31:01 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
17:31:05 4802 NORTH RIVER BOULEVARD AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
17:31:11 RIVERCREST PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL-10, R-10 AND
17:31:19 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, R/OS TO RECREATIONAL OPEN
17:31:23 SPACE PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
17:31:26 CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR
17:31:27 EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:31:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:31:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THOSE IN FAVOR.
17:31:32 ALL RIGHT.
17:31:34 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND SECOND READING
17:31:37 WILL BE JUNE 25 AT 9:30.
17:31:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST TO MOVE THINGS ALONG ITEMS
17:31:44 14-20.
17:31:45 THESE ARE NOT LENGTHY.
17:31:48 WE CAN HEAR THEM AND THEN MOVE THEM ALL TOGETHER WITH
17:31:50 ONE MOTION TO TRANSMIT.
17:32:08 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN WITH NUMBER 14.
17:32:11 >>DANNY COLLINS: GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS WITH THE
17:32:12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:32:16 THE NEXT SERIES OF AMENDMENTS ARE UPDATES FROM THE
17:32:18 CITY'S LAND USE MAP.
17:32:21 HERE ARE THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEVEN PARK SITES
17:32:26 SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
17:32:30 FIRST A LITTLE BACKGROUND OF ALL SEVEN AMENDMENTS.
17:32:35 THIS IS A PUBLICLY INITIATED REQUEST BY TAMPA CITY
17:32:38 COUNCIL TO RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING CITY OF TAMPA PARKS.
17:32:42 EACH PARK IS LISTED ON THE CITY OF TAMPA DEDICATED PARK
17:32:45 LIST AND ALL SITES WILL BE RECOGNIZED THROUGH THE OPEN
17:32:49 SPACE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION.
17:32:51 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
17:32:55 IT CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL OF THE POLICIES IN THE
17:32:56 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO PROMOTING
17:33:01 RECREATIONAL SPACE OPPORTUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
17:33:08 THE FIRST PARK SITE IS AIDS MEMORIAL PARK IN THE HYDE
17:33:10 SPARK SPANISH CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:33:14 AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:33:18 THIS IS THE FUTURE -- THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:33:21 THE SITE HAS TWO FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
17:33:26 THE BROWN TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL 83.
17:33:30 AND THEN THE TRIANGULAR PIECE JUST TO THE NORTH IS
17:33:34 RMU-100.
17:33:37 AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP
17:33:43 RECOGNIZING THE SITE AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:33:47 THIS IS AN IMAGE LOOKING AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE PARK
17:33:49 FROM BAYSHORE BOULEVARD.
17:33:53 THIS IS LOOKING AT SOME OF THE ART THAT IS ON DISPLAY
17:33:56 WITHIN THE PARK.
17:33:59 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL 60 RESIDENTIAL
17:34:05 UNITS OR JUST OVER 30,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL
17:34:06 DEVELOPMENT.
17:34:09 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
17:34:12 IT CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:34:19 OUR NEXT PARK IS 19-18B, BALLAST POINT PARK IN THE
17:34:22 SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS AND MORE SPECIFICALLY
17:34:25 BALLAST POINT NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:34:29 THIS THE AERIAL OF THE SITE NORTH OF THE TAMPA YACHT
17:34:29 CLUB.
17:34:33 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:34:37 THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL-20 FUTURE
17:34:39 LAND USE CATEGORY AND HAS SOME RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE
17:34:41 WITH IT AS WELL.
17:34:44 THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING
17:34:48 THE ENTIRE SITE AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:34:52 THIS IS LOOKING AT THE ENTRANCE SIGN FROM THE PARK FROM
17:34:56 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD.
17:35:00 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL 40 DWELLING UNITS
17:35:04 FROM THE SITE OR 44,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL
17:35:05 DEVELOPMENT.
17:35:07 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUNT
17:35:09 IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
17:35:11 OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:35:17 THE NEXT SITE IS SITE C, CENTENNIAL PARK IN THE CENTRAL
17:35:21 TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE YBOR
17:35:22 NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:35:27 AN AERIAL OF THE SITE OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
17:35:29 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:35:32 THE SITE CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL-50.
17:35:34 AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP
17:35:43 RECOGNIZING IT AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:35:46 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE 71 DWELLING UNITS OF 125,000
17:35:49 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:35:51 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE
17:35:54 PROPOSED REQUEST BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS,
17:35:57 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
17:35:59 PLAN.
17:36:11 AND THIS 19-18C WAS RECOMMENDED TO APPROVAL TO CITY
17:36:11 COUNCIL.
17:36:26 A LITTLE BLURRY BUT -- OUR NEXT AMENDMENT IS TAMPA P
17:36:35 19-18 D, THE CUSCADEN PARK.
17:36:38 AND THE SURROUNDING MAP OF THE PROPERTIES, SINGLE
17:36:43 FAMILY DETACHED SURROUNDED TO THE NORTHEAST AND WEST.
17:36:47 THIS IS THE ADAPTED FUTURE MAP THAT IS CURRENTLY WITHIN
17:36:51 THE URBAN MIXED USE-60 AND RESIDENTIAL-10 AND
17:36:54 RESIDENTIAL-20 SURROUNDING IT TO THE NORTH AND WEST.
17:36:57 THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING
17:37:02 THE SITE AS RECREATION/OPEN SPACE.
17:37:10 THIS IS LOOKING AT THE CUSCADEN PARK SWIMMING POOL.
17:37:13 LOOKING ACROSS CUSCADEN PARK.
17:37:18 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE 96 POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS OR
17:37:23 1.1 72 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL
17:37:24 DEVELOPMENT.
17:37:27 THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE MAP
17:37:29 AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS,
17:37:32 OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:37:38 OUR NEXT SITE IS SITE E, 22ND STREET PARK, WITHIN THE
17:37:41 CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE OLD
17:37:43 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:37:45 AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
17:37:48 PROPERTIES NORTH OF THE TECO PLANT.
17:37:53 AND THE SITE AS TO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
17:37:57 THE GRAY IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND THE NORTHERN PORTION
17:37:59 IS RESIDENTIAL-20.
17:38:02 THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING
17:38:07 THE SITE AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:38:14 THE PROPOSED REQUEST TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL 495
17:38:20 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER TWO MILLION SQUARE FEET OF
17:38:23 NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:38:25 THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT
17:38:28 WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE
17:38:29 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:38:41 OUR NEXT SITE IS THE TAPPAN TRACT PARK IN THE PARK CITY
17:38:42 NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:38:46 THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:38:48 YOU WILL SEE THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
17:38:51 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD JUST TO THE EAST AND THEN
17:38:56 THERE IS INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:39:00 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THREE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
17:39:06 WITHIN THE R-35, LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL, GRAY TO THE SOUTH.
17:39:10 AND THEN A PORTION ALONG THE WATER WHICH IS WITHIN
17:39:14 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA CLASSIFICATION.
17:39:17 THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING
17:39:27 THE SITE AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:39:33 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL OF 1 -- 1087
17:39:36 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER ONE MILLION SQUARE FEET OF
17:39:38 NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:39:41 THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED
17:39:44 REQUEST FOUND CONTRIBUTE WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
17:39:46 POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:39:53 OUR LAST SITE IS SITE G, IT IS TAKOMAH TRAIL PARK IN
17:39:58 THE UNIVERSITY PLAN DISTRICT AND THE TERRACE PARK
17:39:58 NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:40:02 THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:40:05 YOU CAN SEE THERE IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY
17:40:07 DETACHED THAT SURROUNDS THE PROPERTY ESPECIALLY TO THE
17:40:12 NORTH AND WEST OF THE SITE.
17:40:15 THIS SITE IS CONDITION WITH THE RESIDENTIAL-10 WHICH IS
17:40:16 THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE.
17:40:22 AND THEN RESIDENTIAL-20, JUST THE SOUTHERN PORTION.
17:40:25 THERE IS RESIDENTIAL 10 AND RESIDENTIAL 20 THAT
17:40:29 SURROUND THIS SITE ON ALL SIDES.
17:40:32 THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING
17:40:37 THE SITE AS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE.
17:40:41 THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL 308 DWELLING UNITS
17:40:47 OR 432,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:40:48 THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED
17:40:53 AMOUNT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES
17:40:56 AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:40:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR COUNCILMEMBERS?
17:41:02 THIS IS GOOD IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY CONSTITUENTS.
17:41:06 A PRIME DEVELOPMENT -- IF A DEVELOPER COMES IN AND
17:41:09 WANTS TO PUT SOMETHING, THEY CAN'T.
17:41:12 THE BEAUTY AND IMPORTANCE.
17:41:15 BECAUSE THESE ARE TRANSMITTALS MOVE THEM ALL TIME,
17:41:16 14-20.
17:41:18 WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION.
17:41:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:41:21 SORRY TO INTERRUPT.
17:41:23 WITH THIS BEING A PUBLIC HEARING.
17:41:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISHES TO
17:41:29 SPEAK TO 14-20?
17:41:30 TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM.
17:41:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY: A MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:41:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:41:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:41:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE 14-20.
17:41:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA
17:41:51 WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
17:41:54 ANY OPPOSED?
17:42:04 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES.
17:42:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO BACK TO ITEM NUMBER 4 -- IS
17:42:11 THAT YOU SIR?
17:42:15 >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
17:42:18 STAFF.
17:42:26 311 NORTH NEWPORT AVENUE, TPA LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL
17:42:30 TAMPA DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE URBAN PLANNING
17:42:30 VILLAGE.
17:42:33 AND HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE WITH THE OUTLINE.
17:42:38 IT IS JUST WEST OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA CAMPUS.
17:42:41 IT IS ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS THERE THAT GO
17:42:42 DOWN TO SOUTH TAMPA.
17:42:44 THAT PORTION OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IS PREDOMINANTLY
17:42:49 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL TYPE USES
17:42:52 CURRENTLY.
17:42:53 A LITTLE BACKGROUND.
17:42:55 IT IS PRIVATELY INITIATED.
17:42:56 IT IS SMALL SCALE.
17:42:59 APPROXIMATELY 1.78 ACRES.
17:43:03 CURRENTLY THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IS GENERAL LAND
17:43:08 USE MIXED 24 AND THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO GO TO
17:43:12 MIXED USE 60 LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:43:15 TO TAKE A QUICK TOUR.
17:43:17 LOOKING NEWPORT AVENUE.
17:43:19 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE RIGHT THERE.
17:43:21 NOW WE ARE LOOKING NORTHEAST TOWARD THE INTERSECTION OF
17:43:28 NORTH GILCRIST AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE RIGHT.
17:43:32 HERE WE ARE LOOKING NORTHEAST OF WEST NEWPORT AVENUE.
17:43:34 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE RIGHT.
17:43:38 AND HERE WE ARE LOOKING SOUTH DOWN NORTH NEWPORT
17:43:41 AVENUE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT.
17:43:44 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:43:48 IT'S HARD TO TELL, BUT THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTIES
17:43:54 TO THE WEST AND TO THE NORTH IN THAT LIGHT BLUE ARE THE
17:43:56 GENERAL MIXED USE 24.
17:44:00 NOW THAT IS ANOTHER CATEGORY THAT ALLOWS FOR
17:44:03 INDUSTRIAL, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES.
17:44:07 TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE IS ALREADY SOME URBAN
17:44:08 MIXED USE 60.
17:44:11 THAT WAS A PLAN AMENDMENT ABOUT A YEAR OR TWO AGO.
17:44:16 THE BLUE IS THE PUBLIC, SEMI PUBLIC REPRESENTING THE
17:44:17 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
17:44:22 AND THEN THERE ARE SOME UMU DOWN AT KENNEDY AND WILLOW
17:44:28 WHERE THE TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS IS GOING TO BE
17:44:29 LOCATED.
17:44:30 NEXT.
17:44:33 HERE IF THE AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, THE SUBJECT SITE
17:44:38 WILL GO TO THAT URBAN MIXED USE-60 FUTURE LAND USE
17:44:38 CATEGORY.
17:44:43 CURRENTLY UNDER THAT GENERAL MIXED USE, 22 DWELLING
17:44:47 UNITS OR MAXIMUM OF 116,000 SQUARE FEET CAN BE
17:44:47 CONSIDERED.
17:44:51 IF THIS IS APPROVED AND THE SITE DOES GO TO THAT URBAN
17:44:55 MIXED USE-60 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, THE MAXIMUMS
17:45:00 WOULD GO UP TO 106 RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR 251,000 SQUARE
17:45:05 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL UNDER THAT UMU,
17:45:09 AN APPLICANT CAN USE EITHER THE FLOOR AREA RATIO OR THE
17:45:14 UNIT COUNT, WHICHEVER IS MORE BENEFICIAL TO THEM.
17:45:15 NEXT.
17:45:19 DURING THE REVIEW, THERE WERE COMMENTS FROM THE SCHOOL
17:45:25 BOARD, GLORY ELEMENTARY, PLANT HIGH SCHOOL DO NOT HAVE
17:45:26 ADEQUATE CAPACITY.
17:45:31 THEY DO NOT DO A CAPACITY CONCURRENCY EVALUATION AT
17:45:32 THIS POINT AT ANY ZONING.
17:45:34 THAT IS WHEN THEY WILL LOOK IN THE DETAIL.
17:45:38 THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
17:45:39 NEXT.
17:45:42 THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THAT THE REQUEST IS
17:45:45 CONSISTENT WITH A NUMBER OF POLICIES PROMOTING INFILL
17:45:46 DEVELOPMENT.
17:45:50 THERE IS ALSO POLICIES THAT SUPPORT MIXED USE
17:45:54 DEVELOPMENT, INVESTMENT IN THAT CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
17:45:55 DISTRICT.
17:45:57 NEXT.
17:46:00 THERE IS ALSO SPECIFIC POLICIES DEALING WITH THIS
17:46:04 PORTION OF WEST TAMPA AND SUPPORT RESIDENTIAL
17:46:06 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN IT.
17:46:10 AND THEN THIS URBAN MIXED USE 60.
17:46:14 THE TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THE URBAN MIXED
17:46:17 USE-60 IS MORE SUPPORTIVE OF A TRANSIT.
17:46:21 IT'S MORE TRANSIT SUPPORTED DUE TO THE DENSITY AND
17:46:22 INTENSITY.
17:46:25 SO BASED ON ALL THAT, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION IS
17:46:29 RECOMMENDING THAT THIS BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE
17:46:31 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES.
17:46:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:46:34 ANY QUESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS?
17:46:35 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
17:46:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:46:38 DAVID.
17:46:39 >>DAVID HEY: YES.
17:46:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHOLEHEARTEDLY IN SUPPORT OF -- OF
17:46:48 THE MODIFICATION TO THE UMU-60, BUT WHAT I -- WHEN I
17:46:52 LOOKED AT THIS, I SCRATCHED MY HEAD AND I SAID, YOU
17:46:55 KNOW, THAT IS TWO BLOCKS OFF OF KENNEDY.
17:46:57 IT IS NEXT TO A RAILROAD TRACK.
17:47:00 IT IS SURROUNDED BY A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL
17:47:03 THAT IS CLEARLY IN TRANSITION.
17:47:07 I SAID -- YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN IDEAL LOCATION IN MY
17:47:12 MIND FOR A UMU -- A RMU-100.
17:47:15 I DON'T KNOW WHO THE PETITIONER IS WHO PUT THIS
17:47:19 FORWARD, BUT -- BUT TO ME -- AND WE HAVE HAD THIS
17:47:21 CONVERSATION BEFORE WITH REGARD TO THE KENNEDY CORRIDOR
17:47:26 AND TRYING TO INTENSIFY DENSITY WITHIN THE KENNEDY
17:47:30 CORRIDOR FOR PURPOSES OF TRANSIT AND TAKE A LITTLE LOAD
17:47:32 OFF OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
17:47:36 BUT I AM JUST WONDERING IF THAT CAME UP FOR DISCUSSION
17:47:42 OR IS -- IS THE APPLICANT HERE?
17:47:44 >>DAVID HEY: THE APPLICANT IS HERE.
17:47:48 I CAN TELL THAT YOU WE HAVE HAD CONVERSATIONS ABOUT A
17:47:55 YEAR OR TWO AGO THAT DEALT WITH THE -- ONE JUST TO THE
17:47:58 NORTH AND IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECTLY THEY HAD
17:48:03 ORIGINALLY COME IN FOR A COMMERCIAL USE.
17:48:09 AND THERE ARE SOME ISSUES POTENTIALLY, THE RMU 100 IS
17:48:12 AREAS WITH MAJOR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TO
17:48:17 SUPPORT THOSE TYPE -- THAT INTENSITY AND DENSITY.
17:48:21 THE ISSUE WITH THIS AREA IS THAT PART OF THE GRID IS
17:48:24 CUT OFF DUE TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
17:48:30 NOW, AGAIN, UNDER A FUTURE SCENARIO BUT NOTHING HAS
17:48:32 BEEN APPROVED, THOSE TRACKS COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR
17:48:36 SOME SORT OF TRANSIT, AND SEE THERE IS NOTHING ADOPTED
17:48:41 THAT RECOGNIZES THAT AS A POTENTIAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
17:48:44 SO WITHOUT THAT, I THINK STAFF FELT MORE APPROPRIATE
17:48:49 WITH THE UMU-60, THAT IT DOES SUPPORT SOME ADDITIONAL
17:48:52 INTENSITY AND DENSITY, BUT IT DOES LIMIT IT TO --
17:49:00 BECAUSE OF THE GRID NETWORK, THE CUTOFF TO THE WEST
17:49:01 THERE.
17:49:04 THAT WAS OUR -- JUST OUR STAFF DISCUSSION.
17:49:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT, BUT EVEN -- I RECOGNIZE YOU
17:49:10 CAN'T REALLY WALK DOWN THE TRACKS AND GET TO KENNEDY,
17:49:14 BUT IF YOU WALK A BLOCK UP, YOU ARE ON WILLOW, AND TWO
17:49:18 BLOCKS DOWN, AT THE CORNER OF WILLOW AND KENNEDY.
17:49:21 DON'T WE CONSIDER KENNEDY A POTENTIAL OR SIGNIFICANT
17:49:25 TRANSIT CORRIDOR?
17:49:27 >>DAVID HEY: IT IS RECOGNIZED AS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS
17:49:31 CORRIDOR, YOU ARE CORRECT.
17:49:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I SEE WE DON'T HAVE MANY
17:49:36 OPPORTUNITIES TO INCREASE DENSITY WITHOUT A HUGE AMOUNT
17:49:37 OF NEIGHBORHOOD OPPOSITION.
17:49:40 I DON'T SEE MUCH HERE TONIGHT IN A GOOD LOCATION THAT
17:49:42 HAS PRIME OPPORTUNITY.
17:49:45 IN THIS CASE IT WILL DOUBLE THE POTENTIAL DENSITY OF
17:49:48 WHAT IS BEING -- NO, IT WOULD -- IT WOULD ALMOST DOUBLE
17:49:52 THE POTENTIAL DENSITY OF WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
17:49:56 >>DAVID HEY: I WOULD ALWAYS SUGGEST THAT THE PLANNING
17:49:59 COMMISSION WILL LOOK AT ANY STUDIES THAT THE CITY
17:50:02 COUNCIL WOULD LIKE US TO COORDINATE WITH, WITH OUR
17:50:05 PARTNERS AT THE CITY AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
17:50:08 SO IF THERE IS SOME DIRECTION GIVEN, THAT THAT COULD BE
17:50:12 A POTENTIAL TO LOOK AT, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BEA
17:50:19 APPROPRIATE CURRENTLY UNDER THIS REQUEST.
17:50:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHERE IS THE PETITIONER?
17:50:30 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCIL.
17:50:35 MICHAEL HORNER, DALE MABRY HIGHWAY -- REPRESENTING THE
17:50:36 APPLICANT.
17:50:39 MR. DINGFELDER, WE ACCEPT YOUR RECOMMENDATION FOR UMU
17:50:41 -- RMU-100.
17:50:43 IT IS NOT INTERESTED.
17:50:46 THIS SITE IS LIMITED 1.78 ACRES.
17:50:51 WE ARE GOING ON THE -- THE -- ESSENTIALLY THE TRACK
17:50:55 RECORD OF THE PRIOR UMU PLAN AMENDMENT.
17:50:59 WE REVIEW THE PD PLANS FOR MARKET RATE HOUSING.
17:51:03 WE CAN USE THE FAR FOR UMU AND GENERAL MIXED USE
17:51:08 GENERALLY CERTAINLY DOESN'T ALLOW FOR THAT F.A.R.
17:51:08 TRANSFER.
17:51:12 YOU CAN ONLY BUILD SO HIGH AND BUILD SO MUCH PARKING
17:51:16 GARAGE, BUT LOGISTICALLY TO GO ABOVE THAT IS
17:51:17 PROBLEMATIC.
17:51:20 MY CLIENT IS HAPPY WITH UMU-60.
17:51:26 IF YOU WANT TO DO A RMU-100, WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ACCEPT
17:51:27 THE AMENDMENT.
17:51:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH, I AM TRYING TO LOOK AT THE
17:51:31 BIG PICTURE WHERE WE ARE HEADED AND I HAVE BEEN
17:51:35 SPEAKING OF THIS OPPORTUNITY IN THE KENNEDY CORRIDOR TO
17:51:37 GO HIGH RISE, YOU KNOW.
17:51:42 AND I REALIZE THERE ARE SOME NICE MIDRISE IN THAT AREA,
17:51:47 BUT WHERE IS THE RULE THAT SAYS WE CAN'T GO, YOU KNOW,
17:51:48 HIGH RISE THERE.
17:51:51 WHY DOES ALL THE HIGH RISE HAVE TO BE DOWNTOWN.
17:51:54 I DON'T THINK IT WILL HURT THAT AREA AT ALL AND WE WILL
17:51:55 GET MORE PEOPLE.
17:51:58 WE WOULD HAVE MORE PEOPLE ABLE TO USE TRANSIT.
17:52:01 I AM NOT FUSSING, YOU KNOW THAT.
17:52:04 I AM JUST SAYING I THINK WE SHOULD START EXPLORING
17:52:04 THAT.
17:52:07 IF TONIGHT IS NOT THE RIGHT TIME AND OPPORTUNITY,
17:52:08 THAT'S FINE.
17:52:12 AND I WISH YOUR CLIENT WELL AND I VOTE IN SUPPORT OF
17:52:16 THIS, BUT I SAY AS A GENERAL RULE, LET'S TRY INCREASE
17:52:22 DENSITY AND -- IN GOOD PLACES LIKE THIS AGAIN WHERE
17:52:25 THERE IS NOT OPPOSITION AND WHERE -- YOU KNOW, WHERE IT
17:52:28 IS CLOSE TO A CORRIDOR.
17:52:28 SO --
17:52:30 >> THANK YOU FOR THAT COMMENT.
17:52:32 THIS IS URBAN INFILL.
17:52:35 THERE IS NO QUESTION IT CAN ACCOMMODATE HIGHER
17:52:36 INTENSITY.
17:52:37 THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
17:52:38 LUCKY DOG.
17:52:40 IT HAS BEEN THAT WAY FOREVER.
17:52:44 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, UTILIZED IN THE WEST AND MY CLIENT IS
17:52:46 OKAY WITH UMU-60.
17:52:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, STAFF.
17:52:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM.
17:52:53 >>CATE WELLS: IF I COULD, CATE WELLS, FOR PURPOSES OF
17:52:56 TONIGHT'S HEARING, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INCREASE THE
17:52:59 DENSITY BEYOND WHAT WAS NOTICED FOR TONIGHT'S HEARING.
17:53:02 I APPRECIATE THE SENTIMENT, YOU ARE LIMITED TO THE
17:53:04 REQUEST THAT IS BEFORE YOU.
17:53:04 THANK YOU.
17:53:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:53:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HAPPY THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD BE
17:53:14 SO EXCITED HE WOULD CONTINUE IT AND RENOTICE.
17:53:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
17:53:16 ANYTHING ELSE?
17:53:18 >> NO, SIR, THANK YOU.
17:53:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO
17:53:23 SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 4?
17:53:24 SEEING NONE?
17:53:26 DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:53:28 MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:53:30 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:53:35 ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE END INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
17:53:36 ANY OPPOSED?
17:53:38 I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE LEFT OFF.
17:53:40 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:53:42 IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND TAKE EYEING TEM NUMBER 4.
17:53:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE FILE NO. PA19-17 FOR FIRST
17:53:55 READING, AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
17:53:59 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
17:54:04 PROPERTY 311 NORTH NEWPORT AVENUE FROM GENERAL MIXED
17:54:11 USE-24 GMU-24 TO URBAN MIXED USE-60, UMU-60, PROVIDING
17:54:14 FOR REPEAL FOR ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING
17:54:18 FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:54:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
17:54:23 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:54:27 ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
17:54:28 ANY OPPOSED.
17:54:32 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
17:54:38 SECOND HEARING JUNE 25 AT 9:30.
17:54:46 >>> ITEM NUMBER 12.
17:54:52 >>DAVID HEY: THE PETITIONER IS ASKING FOR A
17:54:52 CONTINUANCE.
17:54:56 THEY FELT UNCOMFORTABLE COMING DOWN WITH THE CURRENT
17:54:56 SITUATION.
17:55:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO REMOVE TO JULY 30.
17:55:05 >> EXCUSE ME, TIME PLEASE?
17:55:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT TIME DO WE HAVE.
17:55:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A REGULAR 5 P.M. NIGHT, DAVID?
17:55:15 >>DAVID HEY: YES, 5:01.
17:55:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SAYS 6 P.M. HERE.
17:55:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SAYS 6.
17:55:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE WILL DO IT 5:01 AND UPDATE THAT
17:55:24 CALENDAR.
17:55:25 OKEY-DOKEY.
17:55:28 WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
17:55:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
17:55:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FOR COUNCILMAN GUDES FOR
17:55:33 THAT RESCHEDULING.
17:55:35 ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
17:55:36 ANY OPPOSED.
17:55:37 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:55:40 LAST ITEM OF THE AFTERNOON BECAUSE WE ARE STILL IN
17:55:42 AFTERNOON EVEN THOUGH IT HAS FELT LIKE WE HAVE BEEN
17:55:43 HERE A WEEK.
17:55:52 ITEM NUMBER 13.
17:55:55 >> YOU MENTIONED RESCHEDULING --
17:55:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE CAN'T HEAR THROUGH SHELBY?
17:55:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WANT THE RECORD TO BE CLEAR THAT IT
17:56:03 IS A CONTINUANCE TO THAT DATE.
17:56:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PUT IT AS A CONTINUANCE.
17:56:09 I DIDN'T USE THE WORD "CONTINUANCE."
17:56:13 ITEM NUMBER 13.
17:56:16 >> THIS SHOULD BE THE LAST ITEM I THINK.
17:56:17 LAST ITEM.
17:56:22 THIS IS TEXT AMENDMENT 19-21.
17:56:28 IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY 5.1.9.
17:56:30 A LITTLE BACKGROUND.
17:56:33 THIS WAS INITIATED BY THE TAMPA LEGAL DEPARTMENT IN
17:56:35 PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
17:56:38 IT IS PROPOSING THE DELETION OF NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY
17:56:39 5.1.9.
17:56:43 THE POLICY IS DEEMED LEGALLY PROBLEMATIC BY THE TAMPA
17:56:46 LEGAL DEPARTMENT BASED ON CASE LAW REGARDING PROTECTIVE
17:56:48 CLASS.
17:56:51 YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED AND DID FIND THE
17:56:55 PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO DELETE NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY
17:56:58 5.1.9 WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY GUIDANCE
17:57:02 WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:57:05 IT SEEKS TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOODS FROM INCOMPATIBLE
17:57:09 USES, PERMITTED ZONING DISTRICTS AND FUTURE LAND USE
17:57:12 CATEGORIES THAT ARE PERMITTED IN OF THE LAND
17:57:13 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
17:57:16 ANY ZONING DISTRICT WHICH IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
17:57:19 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACCORDING TO THE CONSISTENCY
17:57:24 MATRIX WILL NOT BE PERMITTED NOR APPROVED.
17:57:26 THE POPULARITY OF A PROPOSED USE BY THE SURROUNDING
17:57:30 RESIDENTS OR STAKEHOLDERS IS NOT A FACTOR IN REGULATING
17:57:31 USES.
17:57:37 THE DELETION OF NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY 5.1.9 WILL NOT
17:57:40 ELIMINATE OR REDUCE ANY EXIST PROGRAM TEXAS FOR
17:57:41 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.
17:57:43 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS CLEAR THAT DISCRIMINATION OF
17:57:47 ANY KIND BASED ON THE OVERALL USE OR THE PEOPLE THAT
17:57:50 WILL OCCUPY THE USE IS NOT TOLERATED IN THE CITY OF
17:57:50 TAMPA.
17:57:55 THE DELETION OF NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY 5.1.9 WOULD REMOVE
17:57:59 ANY AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE REGULATION OF USES BASED ON
17:58:03 THE POPULARITY OF A PARTICULAR USE AND WOULD FURTHER
17:58:06 SEVERAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOUSING RELATED COMP PLAN
17:58:08 POLICIES.
17:58:10 BASED ON THAT, THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING
17:58:13 COMMISSION IS THAT THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT BE FOUND
17:58:17 CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF
17:58:18 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:58:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:58:21 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
17:58:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
17:58:24 I HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
17:58:28 I KNOW THAT -- ESPECIALLY GROUP HOMES, YOU HAVE TO BE
17:58:31 VERY CAUTIOUS, AND WE END UP IN LITIGATION ABOUT GROUP
17:58:34 HOMES AND THAT IS ONE OF THE ONES THAT ARE LISTED.
17:58:37 BUT MISS WELLS, I GUESS I WAS WONDERING WHEN I READ
17:58:42 THIS, IT SEEMS LIKE WE ARE THROWING THE BABY OUT WITH
17:58:43 THE BATH WATER.
17:58:46 IF EVERYBODY LOOKS AT PAGE 22, YOU WILL SEE THE
17:58:49 LANGUAGE THAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED TO STRIKE.
17:58:52 THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE SAYS "THE CITY SHALL CONSIDER TO
17:58:54 SUPPORT STANDARDS AND LAND USE -- LAND DEVELOPMENT
17:58:58 REGULATION THAT'S ADDRESS THE LOCATION AND EXCESSIVE
17:59:06 CONCENTRATION OF LOCALLY UNPOPULAR OF GROUP HOMES,
17:59:09 JAILS AND PUBLIC HOUSING.
17:59:13 I WOULD THINK THAT WE WOULD STILL WANT TO CONTINUE TO
17:59:16 SUPPORT STANDARDS IN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION THAT'S
17:59:25 ADDRESS THE LOCATION OF LANDFILLS, JAILS, WORK RELEASE
17:59:28 FACILITIES, POWER LINES AND POWER LINES MAYBE BEING A
17:59:32 LITTLE MORE CAUTIOUS ON PUBLIC HOUSING AND GROUP HOMES,
17:59:35 MAYBE EVEN THE WORK RELEASE FACILITIES.
17:59:43 BUT IN REGARD TO THE ACTUAL JAILS, LANDFILLS, POWER
17:59:44 LINES.
17:59:46 THOSE ARE THE KIND OF THINGS THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE
17:59:49 REALLY LEGITIMATELY DON'T WANT NEXT TO THEIR
17:59:52 RESIDENTIAL.
17:59:54 >>CATE WELLS: CATE WELLS --
17:59:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: STILL PROTECTION IN THE CAMP PLAN
18:00:04 TO ENSURE THAT THOSE OTHER THREE ITEMS OF POWER LINES
18:00:10 AND LAND FILLS AND JAILS DON'T END UP IMMEDIATELY
18:00:15 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL?
18:00:18 >>DAVID HEY: AGAIN, DAVID HEY, PLANNING COMMISSION
18:00:18 STAFF.
18:00:21 WHEN WE LOOK AT USES.
18:00:25 ALL USES ARE CLASSIFIED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA.
18:00:29 SO WE -- THERE IS A CONSISTENCY MATRIX THAT IS HELD
18:00:32 WITHIN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THAT TALKS ABOUT WHAT
18:00:37 ZONING DISTRICTS ARE PERMITTED UNDER WHAT LAND USE
18:00:37 CATEGORY.
18:00:42 THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO THAT -- THOSE USES THAT ARE
18:01:22 OUTLINED IN THAT.
18:01:26 >> WHICH IS PROBLEMATIC WHEN YOU ARE GROUPING THOSE
18:01:32 USES IN WITH PUBLIC HOUSING AND LANDFILLS THAT THAT --
18:01:37 THAT IS PROBABLY NOT THE BEST WORDED POLICY.
18:01:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO.
18:01:40 I TOTALLY AGREE.
18:01:44 WE SHOULDN'T HAVE LANGUAGE THAT SAYS LOCALLY UNPOPULAR,
18:01:47 BLAH-BLAH-BLAH BECAUSE IT IS NOT A POPULARITY CONTEST.
18:01:50 AND MISS WELLS, I WILL NEED TO YOU CONFIRM WHAT DAVID
18:01:52 SAID.
18:02:00 AS LONG AS WE ARE STILL PROTECTED IN THE CAMP PLAN,
18:02:05 THAT FROM SOME OF THOSE VERIER IS US IS -- SERIOUS USES
18:02:09 LIKE LANDFILLS, JAILS AND POWER LINES.
18:02:14 >> C, ATE WELLS.
18:02:17 I WOULD SUBMIT TO COUNCIL THAT THE REMOVAL OF THIS
18:02:20 LANGUAGE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOESN'T TAKE AWAY
18:02:23 FROM THE EXISTING REGULATIONS THAT ARE IN PLACE TODAY
18:02:27 UNDER CHAPTER 27 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S
18:02:30 CODE OF ORDINANCES.
18:02:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:02:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:02:37 ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMAN?
18:02:38 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC.
18:02:41 A MOTION TO CLOSE.
18:02:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:02:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR -- A MOTION FROM
18:02:46 COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:02:49 A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
18:02:52 ALL IN FAVOR?
18:02:54 WHO WOULD LIKE TRANSMIT THIS ITEM?
18:02:55 ANYBODY?
18:02:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO TRANSMIT.
18:03:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
18:03:02 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
18:03:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
18:03:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
18:03:08 THAT CONCLUDES THE AGENDA.
18:03:09 UNLESS THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE.
18:03:13 INFORMATION REPORT AND NEW BUSINESS BY COUNCILMEMBERS.
18:03:14 COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:03:17 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I HAVE SEVEN ITEMS THAT ARE VERY
18:03:20 IMPORTANT TO ME -- I AM JOKING.
18:03:21 I AM JOKING.
18:03:28 I KNOW WE WANT TO GET OUT.
18:03:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES?
18:03:33 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
18:03:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING.
18:03:40 >>BILL CARLSON: I FORGET TO MAKE ONE EARLIER.
18:03:43 SUGGESTED TO MAKE A MOTION OR WRITE A RESOLUTION TO THE
18:03:47 STATE ATTORNEY TO ASK THAT CHARGES BE DROPPED WITH THE
18:03:51 PROTEST MARCH ON BROREIN.
18:03:53 WHAT WERE YOU THINKING OF THAT.
18:03:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WAS THINKING OF MAKING A PHONE
18:03:57 CALL.
18:03:58 IF YOU WANT TO DO THAT?
18:04:00 >>BILL CARLSON: AS LONG AS SOMEBODY WAS GOING TO
18:04:02 HANDLE IT.
18:04:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO MAKE
18:04:04 THE MOTION.
18:04:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A UNITED LETTER --
18:04:08 >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT
18:04:11 CITY COUNCIL SEND A LETTER TO THE STATE ATTORNEY TO ASK
18:04:15 THAT CHARGES BE DROPPED WITH THE PROTEST -- THE
18:04:19 PEACEFUL PROTEST MARCH ON BROREIN.
18:04:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON AND
18:04:24 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:04:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIR, I APPRECIATE THE MOTION
18:04:34 AND I WANT TO GET -- WHAT CHARGES?
18:04:37 SIMPLE CHARGES THAT SOMEBODY WAS PUT IN JAIL FOR
18:04:41 WHATEVER REASON NOT HAVING TO DO WITH LARCENY OR
18:04:42 BREAKING OF WINDOWS.
18:04:46 I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE CHARGES ARE.
18:04:50 I DON'T KNOW -- I THINK THE CHIEF DIDN'T HAVE A DIRECT
18:04:52 ANSWER ON THAT, DID HE?
18:04:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I DIDN'T HEAR THE CHARGES.
18:04:58 ARE THERE ONE OF UNLAWFUL PROTEST.
18:05:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, I HAVE NO
18:05:02 PROBLEM WITH THAT.
18:05:05 IF IT IS JUST UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH
18:05:07 THAT AT ALL.
18:05:10 >> THAT IS MY POINT OF ASKING CHIEF DUGAN.
18:05:12 HOW MANY WERE ARRESTED.
18:05:14 HE SAID 138.
18:05:16 WHICH ONES ARE CHARGED WITH FELONIES.
18:05:18 I CONCUR WITH COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:05:23 IF THEY ARE NOTICE NOT HAVING NOTICE TO PROTEST.
18:05:25 YES, I CAN GO ALONG WITH THAT.
18:05:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:05:29 >>LUIS VIERA: A POINT WELL-MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA
18:05:31 AND THANK YOU FOR THAT, SIR.
18:05:33 MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE WERE -- NOTE THE
18:05:36 QUALIFICATION, THERE WERE INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE ARRESTED
18:05:40 BECAUSE WHEN THERE WAS A CALL TO DISPERSE THE CROWD,
18:05:43 FOLKS DIDN'T, BUT MANY OF THOSE WERE ARRESTED FOR BEING
18:05:43 THERE.
18:05:47 BUT A DISTINCTION BETWEEN THAT AND SOMEBODY DOING
18:05:49 PROPERTY DAMAGE, ETC.
18:05:51 SO, YEAH, THAT --
18:05:54 >>BILL CARLSON: A WAY TO MAKE IT MORE SPECIFIC NOW?
18:05:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I SUGGEST WE SAY MINOR
18:05:59 MISDEMEANORS.
18:06:01 >>BILL CARLSON: YEAH.
18:06:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET HIM TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS
18:06:05 WORTH.
18:06:07 MINOR MISDEMEANORS.
18:06:10 YOU ARE A VANDAL AND SMASH A WINDOW, THAT COULD STILL
18:06:11 BE A MISDEMEANOR.
18:06:14 IT MIGHT BE A FIRST-DEGREE MISDEMEANOR OR WHATEVER.
18:06:18 IF WE SAY MINOR MISDEMEANORS, I THINK WE ARE GETTING
18:06:19 THE POUND ACROSS.
18:06:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THAT ALL RIGHT, COUNCILMAN
18:06:24 CARLSON?
18:06:27 TO CLARIFY FOR LETTER OF SUPPORT --
18:06:29 >>BILL CARLSON: --
18:06:34 >> LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TO CITY
18:06:38 ATTORNEY THAT MINOR MISDEMEANORS FOR THE PEACEFUL
18:06:42 PROTEST MARCH ON BROREIN STREET.
18:06:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND.
18:06:47 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:06:49 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
18:06:52 >> SECOND, BACK TO COMMUNICATION AND COUNCILMAN GUDES
18:06:55 ALSO MENTIONED THIS MORNING.
18:06:59 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE MOTION TO ASK CITY STAFF TO
18:07:03 DEVELOP A COMMUNICATION PROCESS BY WHICH CITY
18:07:05 COUNCILMEMBERS WILL GET MORE IMMEDIATE INFORMATION
18:07:08 REGARDING URGENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY THAT WILL
18:07:11 INCLUDE HOW TO DEVELOPMENT MUCH-NEEDED INFORMATION THAT
18:07:14 WE CAN DISSEMINATE TO NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY
18:07:15 LEADERS.
18:07:18 THE GENESIS OF THIS IS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERS
18:07:22 LAST NIGHT WERE ASKING ME, WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO TELL
18:07:23 OUR MEMBERS.
18:07:25 THERE ARE PEOPLE MARCHING DOWN THE STREET.
18:07:26 WHAT DO WE TELL THEM.
18:07:28 THERE IS NOTHING TO TELL THEM.
18:07:31 WE NEED A COMMUNICATION PROCESS TO BE ABLE TO HELP US
18:07:39 ANSWER QUESTIONS TO THE -- WE ARE THE FRONT LINE OF
18:07:40 CONSTITUENTS.
18:07:43 YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE NATIONAL GUARD.
18:07:45 WE NEED INFORMATION OURSELVES BUT WE NEED THINGS WE CAN
18:07:48 SEND OUT TO THEM AS WELL.
18:07:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THAT IN THE
18:07:55 FORM OF A STAFF REPORT?
18:07:55 >> YES.
18:07:56 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CHAIR.
18:07:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
18:07:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IN MY MOTION I ASKED HER TO COME BACK
18:08:01 WITH THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS.
18:08:05 WHEN SHE COMES BACK, I THINK WE CAN ADD THOSE IN.
18:08:07 WHAT SHE BRINGS US HOW WE ARE GOING TO LAY THIS
18:08:08 COMMUNICATION OUT.
18:08:10 THAT IS THE -- THE BIG PROBLEM WE HAVE BEEN ASKING AND
18:08:11 ASKING.
18:08:15 THAT'S WHY I REFER TO THE -- THE CITY ATTORNEY NOW AND
18:08:19 PUT IT IN HER HANDS TO COME BACK AND TELL US WHAT THOSE
18:08:21 STANDARDS --
18:08:24 >> DO YOU ALL AGREE HIS MOTION.
18:08:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I THINK COUNCILMAN GUDES PUTS IT
18:08:28 ALL TOGETHER.
18:08:30 >>BILL CARLSON: YOU THINK YOURS IS FINE?
18:08:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I MAKE SURE EVERYBODY HAS A PUBLIC
18:08:35 INFORMATION OFFICE -- I NEED THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PUT
18:08:38 THAT HOW DOES THAT FIT IN RELATION TO US.
18:08:42 DOES THAT HAVE TO BE PUT US AS A CHARTER AMENDMENT --
18:08:46 PUT INTO AN EXECUTIVE ORDER AND WHATEVER SO WE KNOW
18:08:48 WHERE WE STAND ON THAT.
18:08:50 SO I THINK IT KIND OF INCLUDES EVERYTHING YOU TALK
18:08:51 ABOUT.
18:08:52 WHEN SHE BRINGS THAT BACK TO US.
18:08:56 IF THERE IS A DOUBT WE CAN ADD THAT IN AND HAVE TO GO
18:08:59 BACK AND SO FORTH AND SO ON.
18:09:02 BUT IT IS IN THE CITY ATTORNEY'S HAND TO BRIDGE US BACK
18:09:03 SOMETHING.
18:09:06 >>BILL CARLSON: YOU WANT ME TO DROP THIS ONE?
18:09:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I MEAN, IF YOU CAN WAIT, I THINK THE
18:09:11 MOTION I MADE WAS PRETTY CLEAR THERE IS A COMMUNICATION
18:09:12 PROBLEM.
18:09:14 MR. SHELBY, WAS IT NOT?
18:09:17 I THOUGHT IT WAS PRETTY CLEAR WHAT WE WERE ASKING.
18:09:20 WE KNOW IT IS A COMMUNICATION PROBLEM OF US GETTING
18:09:22 INFORMATION TO THE COMMUNITY.
18:09:24 >>BILL CARLSON: I WILL WITHDRAW THAT AND THEN IF THEY
18:09:28 DON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS WE WILL COME BACK TO IT
18:09:28 LATER.
18:09:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO?
18:09:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOT AT THIS TIME.
18:09:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:09:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, I WANT TO TALK TO THOSE WHO
18:09:41 CAME TO SPEAK TO US. THEY WERE VERY CORDIAL AND THEY
18:09:42 HAD THEIR DAY AND HOW THEY FELT.
18:09:47 AND I WANT TO THANK UNA GARVEY WHO DID A WONDERFUL JOB
18:09:50 WITH THE CONVENTION CENTER AND EVERYONE WHO ATTENDED.
18:09:51 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:09:52 DID YOU A BEAUTIFUL JOB.
18:09:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
18:09:59 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECOND BY CITRO.
18:10:02 ANY OPPOSED?
18:10:03 ALL RIGHT, WE ARE ADJOURNED.
18:10:04 THANK YOU.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.