TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 2020
6:00 P.M. VIRTUAL MEETING
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
18:07:28 >> ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
18:07:37 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
18:07:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
18:07:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
18:07:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
18:07:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
18:07:49 BEFORE WE BEGIN.
18:07:55 A MEMO THAT WAS SENT OUT BY THE OFFICE OF COUNCILMAN
18:07:58 CARLSON WHO WILL NOT BE PARTICIPATING THIS EVENING.
18:08:01 HE IS OUT OF TOWN WITH A SPECIAL OCCASION FOR HIS SON
18:08:05 WHO IS RECEIVING AN AWARD THIS EVENING.
18:08:09 FAMILY IS VERY IMPORTANT AND WE UNDERSTAND.
18:08:13 HAVING SAID THAT, WE WILL BEGIN IF MR. SHELBY NOTHING
18:08:17 FURTHER THAT YOU WOULD WISH TO SAY OR ADD BEFORE WE
18:08:18 BEGIN THE HEARING.
18:08:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OH, I DO, THANK YOU.
18:08:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, MR. SHELBY.
18:08:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY: GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL.
18:08:30 MARTIN SHELBY.
18:08:35 THIS VIRTUAL MEETING COURTESY OF GO TO WEBINAR IS THE
18:08:38 FIRST QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING WE ARE HOPING IN THIS
18:08:39 PLATFORM.
18:08:42 IT IS BEING HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNOR
18:08:49 EXECUTIVE ORDER 20-69 AS EXTENDED BY 20-179 OF THE
18:08:52 EMERGENCY RULES OF PROCEDURES AS ADOPTED AND AMENDED BY
18:08:53 CITY COUNCIL.
18:08:56 IT IS BEING CONDUCTED BY REMOTE PARTICIPATION OR VIDEO
18:08:59 TELECONFERENCING WHICH IS REFERRED TO BY STATE OF
18:09:03 FLORIDA STATUTES AND RULES AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA
18:09:03 TECHNOLOGY.
18:09:06 THE PUBLIC AND THE CITIZENS OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH,
18:09:10 LISTEN AND VIEW THE MEETING ON CABLE TV AND THE
18:09:10 INTERNET.
18:09:15 THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PARTICIPATE AND REGISTER FOR
18:09:19 LIVE TESTIMONY VIA CNT.
18:09:24 AND I WILL TELL THAT YOU IS ACCESSIBLE ON THE CITY'S
18:09:32 WEB SITE AT TAMPAGOV.NET/CITY-COUNCIL AND MORE
18:09:36 PARTICULARLY YOU CAN SEE THE RULES AND PROCEDURES
18:09:40 RELATED TO THE QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING PROCESS AT
18:09:47 TAMPAGOV.NET/QUASI.
18:09:50 NOW WRITTEN COMMENTS, COUNCIL, WHICH HAVE BEEN RECEIVED
18:09:55 BY MAIL OR E-MAIL HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL
18:09:58 ARE AVAILABLE TO CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN
18:10:00 THE RECORD OF THE HEARING.
18:10:04 NOW ALL TESTIMONY RECEIVED TIMELY BY MAIL, E-MAIL, AND
18:10:10 CMT SHOULD BE BY YOU COUNCIL AFFORDED EQUAL
18:10:13 CONSIDERATION AS IF THE STATEMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON.
18:10:15 AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE SOME HOUSEKEEPING TONIGHT
18:10:19 RELATIVE TO WHICH HEARINGS ARE ABLE TO GO AND WHICH
18:10:21 CANNOT AND WE WILL FIND OUT WHY.
18:10:23 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:10:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SHELBY.
18:10:33 HAVING SAID THAT, WE WILL BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:10:37 >>RYAN MANASSE: COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE, LAND
18:10:38 DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATION.
18:10:44 ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ20-21 IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO
18:10:49 THE 10/22 AT 5:01 P.M.
18:10:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:10:53 ANYTHING ELSE?
18:10:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU KNOW IF THE PETITIONER IS
18:10:55 PRESENT?
18:10:59 >>RYAN MANASSE: I AM NOT AWARE IF THEY ARE.
18:11:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
18:11:03 DO YOU KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK TO
18:11:04 CONTINUANCE?
18:11:10 ANYBODY AWARE OF PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THIS?
18:11:14 ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CONTINUANCE?
18:11:18 OKAY.
18:11:21 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, THE PETITIONER IS HERE IF YOU WOULD
18:11:26 LIKE FOR ME TO PUT HIM ON AS A PANELIST.
18:11:29 THAT WILL BE MR. LAWLESS.
18:11:32 >> THAT'S CORRECT, THAT IS ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:11:38 WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ 20-21.
18:11:43 >> CORRECT, JOHN LAWLESS.
18:12:00 >> ITEM NUMBER 9 THE APPLICATION OF --
18:12:03 >> MR. LAWLESS IS THE REPRESENTATIVE.
18:12:04 >> I AM JOHN LAWLESS.
18:12:06 I BELIEVE THERE IS SOME CONFUSION.
18:12:15 I'M HERE ON ITEM NUMBER 6, REZ19-85.
18:12:19 >> THEN WE WILL -- THAT IS INCORRECT.
18:12:22 WE DO NOT HAVE THE APPLICANT OR PETITIONER FOR ITEM
18:12:27 NUMBER 9.
18:12:29 >>RYAN MANASSE: IT WAS ADVISED TO THE APPLICANT THAT
18:12:32 THEY DIDN'T NEED TO BE PRESENT BECAUSE STAFF WAS GOING
18:12:37 TO HOUSECLEAN THESE ITEMS FOR THE HEARING.
18:12:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE PRESENT.
18:12:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: A CONTINUANCE.
18:12:45 A REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE UNTIL WHAT STATE.
18:12:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OCTOBER 22, 5:01 P.M.
18:12:50 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, SIR.
18:12:53 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WATCHING, LISTENING OR VIEWING
18:12:58 THIS AT SOME POINT, YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE ANY NOTICE OF
18:12:59 THIS CONTINUANCE.
18:13:03 SO THE DATE IS OCTOBER 22 THAT WILL BE REQUESTED 2020
18:13:07 AT 5:01 P.M. MR. CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU.
18:13:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:13:12 ALL RIGHT, WHAT ELSE DO WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA THAT
18:13:14 REQUIRES --
18:13:16 >> WE NEED A MOTION PLEASE.
18:13:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN I GET A MOTION TO CONTINUE
18:13:25 ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ20-21 TO OCTOBER 22 AT 5:01 P.M. DO I
18:13:26 HAVE A MOTION.
18:13:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO MOVED.
18:13:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
18:13:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:13:39 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:13:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:13:46 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:13:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:13:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:13:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:14:01 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED -- MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON
18:14:03 BEING ABSENT.
18:14:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I ALSO SEE THAT NUMBER 12 CANNOT
18:14:07 BE HEARD.
18:14:08 NO AFFIDAVIT FILED?
18:14:12 >>RYAN MANASSE: COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE, PLANNING AND
18:14:14 DEVELOPMENT.
18:14:18 NUMBER 11, THEY ARE ALSO ASKING A CONTINUANCE TO
18:14:22 OCTOBER 8 PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:01 P.M. THEY ARE ELECTING
18:14:25 TO NOTICE AT THAT TIME SO STAFF WILL DIRECT THEM WHEN
18:14:29 IT IS TIME TO RENOTICE TO GO AHEAD AND DO SO.
18:14:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
18:14:34 ALL RIGHT, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS?
18:14:35 >> YES, I HAVE A QUESTION.
18:14:38 YOU SAY A CONTINUANCE OR RESCHEDULING?
18:14:41 >>RYAN MANASSE: A CONTINUANCE.
18:14:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SO MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER.
18:14:47 ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THAT CONTINUANCE?
18:14:50 >>RYAN MANASSE: THE AGENT AND I WERE IN COMMUNICATION
18:14:53 AS THE PREVIOUS ONE AND STAFF TOLD THEM IT WOULD BE
18:14:57 HOUSE CLEANING AT THE BEGINNING OF THE AGENDA.
18:14:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: UNDERSTOOD.
18:15:00 MOTION PLEASE.
18:15:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION.
18:15:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
18:15:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:15:08 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 20-23 TO OCTOBER 10, YEAR 2020 --
18:15:10 DID I HEAR 5:01.
18:15:12 >>RYAN MANASSE: OCTOBER 8.
18:15:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BUT 5:01.
18:15:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 5:01.
18:15:20 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM --
18:15:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:15:24 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:15:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:15:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:15:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:15:35 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:15:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:15:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:15:42 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:15:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. RYAN MANASSE, ITEM NUMBER 12
18:15:47 CANNOT BE HEARD.
18:15:52 >>RYAN MANASSE: REMOVE ITEM NUMBER 12, REMOVE IT FROM
18:15:53 THE AGENDA.
18:15:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM NUMBER 12?
18:16:00 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:16:02 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:16:06 ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:16:07 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:16:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:16:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:16:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:16:17 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:16:18 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:16:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:16:24 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:16:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, SO IF MY MEMORY SERVES
18:16:34 ME RIGHT, 14 MINUS 3, I GUESS THAT IS 11 ITEMS TONIGHT.
18:16:39 NOW WE WILL BEGIN WITH THE AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:16:43 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS, MARY SAMANIEGO.
18:16:46 IF YOU CAN BRING UP MY POWERPOINT PLEASE.
18:16:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN?
18:16:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MR. SHELBY.
18:16:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE
18:16:53 PUBLIC HEARING.
18:16:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION TO MOVE ITEM 1-14.
18:16:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:17:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND
18:17:03 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN.
18:17:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
18:17:08 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:17:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:17:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ASSUMING THAT WE EXCLUDED THE THREE
18:17:19 THAT WE CONTINUED, YES, AYE.
18:17:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:17:24 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:17:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:17:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:17:32 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:17:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOW WE HAVE TO WALK THROUGH THE
18:17:38 PROCESS OF HOW THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THIS HEARING AND
18:17:44 SUBSEQUENT HEARINGS, HOW THEY WILL BE.
18:17:46 IS THE CLERK GOING TO DO THE SWEARING IN.
18:17:49 AND I WILL ASK EACH PERSON WHEN THEY SPEAK TO AFFIRM
18:17:50 THAT THEY HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:17:52 SHOULD WE DO IT THAT WAY?
18:17:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT IS FINE.
18:17:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
18:18:04 SO I SUSPECT -- WHO IS GOING TO DO THAT?
18:18:08 WOULD YOU LIKE TO VIRTUALLY SWEAR IN THE WITNESSES.
18:18:11 >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, DO YOU SWEAR AND
18:18:14 AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH,
18:18:16 AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
18:18:17 THANK YOU.
18:18:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
18:18:20 WHEN YOU DO STATE YOUR NAME FOR THOSE WHO ARE
18:18:23 PARTICIPATING, PLEASE REAFFIRM THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN
18:18:24 IN.
18:18:26 I APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH.
18:18:27 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:18:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:18:33 LET'S BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:18:34 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: OKAY.
18:18:34 THANK YOU.
18:18:44 CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN.
18:18:49 IS IT VISIBLE?
18:18:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN, YES.
18:18:52 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
18:18:57 THE FIRST ITEM AB2-20-04.
18:19:04 A SMALL VENUE BEER AND WINE ON-PREMISE ONLY 1517 EAST
18:19:05 7TH AVENUE.
18:19:09 IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED YSC-1.
18:19:13 THE PROPOSED USE IS RETAIL SALES, SHOPPERS GOODS WITH A
18:19:14 CIGAR LOUNGE.
18:19:18 THERE IS CURRENTLY NO ACTIVE AB SALES PERMITTED ON THE
18:19:19 PROPERTY.
18:19:23 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A TOTAL AB SALES AREA OF
18:19:28 3278 SQUARE FEET.
18:19:35 WITH 3169 SQUARE FEET INDOOR AND 109 SQUARE FEET OUT
18:19:37 DOOR.
18:19:40 THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER
18:19:41 14.
18:19:46 IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE YBOR CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT AS
18:19:51 WELL AS THE YBOR CITY URBAN VILLAGE AND THE SALES AREA
18:19:55 SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN ANY PARKING OR LOADING AREA AND
18:20:00 SPACE AND ALL PERMITS ISSUED AFTER APRIL 1, 2011 SHOULD
18:20:05 BE KEPT ON-SITE ADOPTED ORDINANCE AND ASSOCIATED SITE
18:20:05 PLAN.
18:20:08 THEY ARE LOOKING FOR ONE WAIVER FROM A SEPARATION
18:20:11 DISTANCE FROM ANOTHER AB ESTABLISHMENT AS OPPOSED TO
18:20:13 250 FEET.
18:20:17 THEY ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER DOWN TO 19 FEET IN TOTAL.
18:20:20 THE OTHER ADJOINING PROPERTY WITH THE 19 FEET IS THE
18:20:27 KING CORONA CIGAR AB USE NEXT DOOR AT 1523 EAST 7TH
18:20:30 AVENUE.
18:20:32 THERE IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
18:20:35 IT IS AN EXISTING BUILDING.
18:20:38 YOU ARE PROPOSING HAVING THE ENTIRE BUILDING AS STATED
18:20:43 AB SALES WITH 3169 SQUARE FEET IN A SMALL AREA UP FRONT
18:20:50 OUTSIDE OF 109 SQUARE FEET TOTAL.
18:20:56 HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON 7TH AVENUE
18:20:59 BETWEEN 16TH AND 15TH.
18:21:02 SUBJECT PROPERTY IN RED.
18:21:06 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM 7TH AVENUE.
18:21:09 NEIGHBORS PROPERTIES, THE FIRST ONE ON THE TOP TO THE
18:21:13 EAST IS 1523 EAST 7TH AVENUE AND THEN THE NEIGHBORING
18:21:18 PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS 1515 EAST 7TH AVENUE.
18:21:22 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AT 1522 EAST 7TH AVENUE.
18:21:26 AND DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH BEHIND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
18:21:35 ACROSS THE ALLEY IS 1704 NORTH 16TH STREET.
18:21:48 THE ONLY WAIVER AGAIN THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING IS THE
18:21:49 SEPARATION DISTANCE.
18:21:53 THERE ARE SOME MINOR CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
18:21:56 READING REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND
18:21:58 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION DEPARTMENT THAT ARE LISTED IN
18:22:05 YOUR STAFF REPORT AND THE PLANNING STAFF DID FIND IT
18:22:08 INCONSISTENT BECAUSE OF A WAIVER REDUCTION TO ANOTHER
18:22:11 AB ESTABLISHMENT FROM 250 FEET DOWN TO ONLY 19 FEET.
18:22:19 THERE ARE NO OTHER REVISIONS FROM STAFF RECOMMENDED AND
18:22:25 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
18:22:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:22:27 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:22:34 NEXT UP.
18:22:42 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
18:22:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WOULD THAT BE THE PETITIONER?
18:22:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:22:49 DO WE HAVE A PETITIONER FOR ITEM NUMBER 1?
18:22:54 ITEM NUMBER 1?
18:23:09 IS THE PETITIONER ONLINE, ON HOLD OR IN PERSON AT THE
18:23:15 CONVENTION CENTER?
18:23:20 CLERK, DO YOU HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE, ON STANDBY FOR THIS
18:23:26 ITEM?
18:23:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, MR. SHELBY --
18:23:35 >> TOM ROBINSON.
18:23:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TOM ROBINSON ON THE LINE.
18:23:41 WERE YOU SWORN IN?
18:23:43 >> YES, I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:23:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
18:23:50 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, MAY I JUST MAKE INQUIRY OF MR.
18:23:51 ROBERTSON.
18:23:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD.
18:23:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. ROBINSON, UNDER -- UNDER THE
18:24:00 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES CAUSED BY COVID-19, THE CITY
18:24:04 AGREES THAT EACH APPLICANT TO CONFIRM AGREEMENT ON
18:24:15 RECORD THAT THE TIMELINE OF SET FORTH ON 24 E AND 16
18:24:20 6.3 OF FLORIDA STATUE EXTENDED.
18:24:24 DO YOU CONFIRM THE AGREEMENT OF THE 180-DAY TIMELINE?
18:24:26 >> YES, I CONFIRM.
18:24:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
18:24:28 THANK YOU, SIR.
18:24:29 >> THANK YOU.
18:24:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR.
18:24:31 GO AHEAD.
18:24:36 >> OKAY.
18:24:37 STAFF GAVE THE REPORT.
18:24:40 JUST TO REITERATE, THE INFORMATION THAT WAS SUBMITTED
18:24:46 THERE WAS FOR FROM STAFF.
18:24:48 THE CLIENT IS MORE THAN WELCOME TO MAKE THOSE
18:24:53 ADJUSTMENTS AS WELL AS -- WE ARE REQUESTING THAT WAIVER
18:24:57 TO THE 19 FEET.
18:25:05 SO A CIGAR STORE.
18:25:09 BEER AND WINE WITHIN ITS STORE TO HOPEFULLY INCREASE
18:25:16 BUSINESS TRAFFIC TO THE STORE AND HAVE CUSTOMER STAY
18:25:21 AND BUY CIGARS.
18:25:23 I AM HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:25:34 I ALSO HAVE THE OWNER ODELMA MATOS ON THE LINE.
18:25:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
18:25:38 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME?
18:25:39 HEARING NONE, SEEING NONE.
18:25:42 DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC SPEAKERS?
18:25:48 ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1?
18:25:52 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS FOR THE APPLICANT
18:25:53 AGAIN?
18:25:54 ANYTHING?
18:25:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO ONE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, SIR.
18:25:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:26:01 BEING NO ONE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND NO QUESTIONS FROM
18:26:02 COUNCILMEMBERS.
18:26:08 MR. SHELBY, WOULD IT BE PROPER TO ASK FOR A REBUTTAL AT
18:26:11 THIS POINT OR WOULD IT NOT BE NECESSARY?
18:26:14 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE YOU HAVE COUNCILMAN
18:26:16 DINGFELDER THAT WISHES TO BE RECOGNIZED.
18:26:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
18:26:21 GO AHEAD.
18:26:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I APOLOGIZE IF THAT WAS ALREADY
18:26:24 MENTIONED.
18:26:26 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION?
18:26:31 >> THE HOURS OF OPERATION IS SUNDAY, MONDAY FROM 10
18:26:36 A.M. TO 10 P.M. TUESDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM 10 A.M.
18:26:40 TO 2 A.M.--
18:26:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DIDN'T HEAR THE LAST ONE.
18:26:50 10 A.M. TO 2 A.M. ON TUESDAY THROUGH SATURDAY AND CEASE
18:26:53 ALCOHOL SALES 30 MINUTES PRIOR TO CLOSING.
18:26:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
18:26:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. DINGFELDER --
18:27:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS WISHING
18:27:02 TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME?
18:27:03 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:27:05 I HAVE A QUESTION FOR A FOLLOW-UP PLEASE?
18:27:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
18:27:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WANT TO CONFIRM THE HOURS OF
18:27:15 OPERATION ON THE SITE PLAN, MARY SAMANIEGO, FOR
18:27:22 COUNCILMEMBERS.
18:27:25 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: I APOLOGIZE, MARY SAMANIEGO.
18:27:28 PER THE STAFF REPORT AND ON THE SITE PLAN, THE
18:27:30 APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD
18:27:34 BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14.
18:27:38 SO THE CHAPTER 14 HOURS OF OPERATION COMMENCE AT 7 A.M.
18:27:43 ON EACH DAY, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY ENDING AT 3 A.M.
18:27:47 THE FOLLOWING DAY, AND THEN COMMENCING AT 11 A.M. ON
18:27:51 SUNDAY AND ENDING AT 3 A.M. THE FOLLOWING DAY.
18:27:54 SO THAT'S WHAT IS ON THE PLAN OF RECORD AND THE STAFF
18:27:55 REPORT AS OF NOW.
18:27:59 IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO REVISE THOSE, WE NEED TO
18:28:03 CAPTURE THAT WITHIN THE MOTION OF CITY COUNCIL AND HAVE
18:28:06 THAT AS A REVISION TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:28:10 SECOND READING, PLEASE.
18:28:15 >> ON BEHALF OF MY CLIENT, WE WILL REVISE THE HOURS TO
18:28:18 BE CONSISTENT.
18:28:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
18:28:21 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:28:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, MR.
18:28:25 MANISCALCO?
18:28:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
18:28:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO TO THE APPLICANT, YOU ARE --
18:28:35 YOUR HOURS ARE LESS FOR -- ALL OF THE DAYS AS -- SO WE
18:28:38 ARE GOING TO -- ULTIMATELY THE MOTION WILL REFLECT THE
18:28:42 HOURS THAT YOU STATED NOT THE HOURS THAT ARE ON THE
18:28:46 PETITION, CORRECT?
18:28:48 >> THAT'S CORRECT, MR. DINGFELDER.
18:28:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, SIR.
18:28:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MR. DINGFELDER, DOES
18:28:57 THAT MEAN THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CHANGED
18:29:00 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING?
18:29:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM ASKING THE PETITIONER THAT
18:29:06 QUESTION, BUT, YEAH -- LET HIM ANSWER.
18:29:14 >> WE WILL GO WITH WHATEVER IS EASIEST FOR COUNCIL.
18:29:19 WE WILL OPEN UNTIL 3 A.M. -- NOT 7 AND WE CERTAINLY
18:29:23 COULD BE AND THIS WILL GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY DO SO.
18:29:33 SO I AM LEAVING IT AS STATED ON THE APPLICATION -- FOR
18:29:34 THE FUTURE.
18:29:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN FOLLOW UP.
18:29:41 THAT MEANS -- THE SITE PLAN WILL BE UNCHANGED AND HOURS
18:29:46 CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14, IS THAT CORRECT?
18:29:47 >> YES.
18:29:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MANISCALCO, ONE MORE FOLLOW-UP
18:29:50 TO THAT?
18:29:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE.
18:29:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM JUST ONE COUNCILMEMBER BUT
18:29:57 APPEALED TO ME GREATLY YOU WOULD BE CLOSING AT 2 A.M.
18:30:02 I THINK FIVE -- FIVE OF THE DAYS OF THE WEEK AND
18:30:08 EARLIER ON THE OTHER TWO.
18:30:12 I THINK TPD LIKES TO START CLOSING THINGS DOWN A LITTLE
18:30:18 BIT EARLIER, OTHERWISE IS REVERTS TO 4 A.M., IS THAT
18:30:23 CORRECT, MARY?
18:30:26 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: NO, SIR, IT IS 3 A.M.
18:30:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 3 A.M.
18:30:31 SO -- IT APPEALED TO ME THAT YOU WERE SUGGESTING A
18:30:34 SLIGHTLY EARLIER, BUT THAT'S JUST ME.
18:30:36 THANK YOU.
18:30:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:30:40 DOES THAT SETTLE THE QUESTIONS.
18:30:40 EVERYTHING ANSWERED?
18:30:44 ANY OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
18:30:45 OKAY.
18:30:50 MAY I HAVE THEN A MOTION TO CLOSE.
18:30:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
18:30:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO MOVED.
18:30:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA,
18:30:59 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:31:01 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:31:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:31:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:31:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:31:11 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:31:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:31:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:31:18 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:31:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:31:22 AND GOING DOWN THE LINE TO READ THIS ITEM COUNCILMAN
18:31:24 MIRANDA, TAKE ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:31:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WILL TRY, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:31:31 MOVE ITEM NUMBER 1, FILE NO. AB2-20-04.
18:31:37 THAT IS THE ORDINANCE NUMBER AND THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN
18:31:41 WITH THE REVISIONS TO BE MADE OF THE APPLICANT HAS MET
18:31:45 THE BURDEN OF PROOF OF EVIDENCE THAT SPECIAL USE AS
18:31:48 PETITIONED AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PRESENTS THE
18:31:53 GENERAL STANDARDS OF SECTION 27.29 OF THE CITY OF TAMPA
18:31:57 CODE THAT IS COMPARABLE WITH CONTIGUOUS SURROUNDING
18:32:03 PROPERTIES AND NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENCE OF A
18:32:04 COMBATABLE USE.
18:32:07 THE USE WILL ENSURE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND
18:32:12 GENERAL WELL WARE FOR THE SITE SUBMITTED.
18:32:16 THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A BURDEN OF PROOF AND
18:32:20 COMPETENCE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND THE ONLY WAIVER I
18:32:22 THINK WAS THE DISTANCE BETWEEN HIM AND THE OTHER
18:32:27 PARTIES NEXT TO HIM.
18:32:33 THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE OF 27 CITY OF
18:32:34 TAMPA CODE.
18:32:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MIRANDA, WOULD YOU THEN, PLEASE,
18:32:46 ON THE AGENDA READ THE SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE FOR NUMBER
18:32:47 ONE.
18:32:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FOR ORDINANCE FOR SPECIAL USE
18:32:53 PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES SMALL VENUE
18:32:58 CONSUMPTION ON PREMISE ONLY AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE
18:33:02 OF BEER AND WINE AT OR CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF
18:33:06 LAND LOCATED 1517 EAST 7TH AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, AS
18:33:10 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2, PROVIDED THAT
18:33:14 ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF THE ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT
18:33:18 ARE REPEALED PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:33:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY: INCLUDES THE CHANGES OF FIRST AND
18:33:21 SECOND READING.
18:33:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:33:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:33:27 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:33:30 ROLL CALL VOTE PLEASE.
18:33:31 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:33:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:33:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO.
18:33:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:33:42 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:33:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:33:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:33:48 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:33:55 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION HELD DECEMBER 10 AT 5:00
18:33:58 P.M.
18:34:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER TWO.
18:34:05 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO, ITEM NUMBER 2 ON
18:34:06 YOUR AGENDA.
18:34:08 I BELIEVE WE NEED TO BE SWORN.
18:34:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, PLEASE.
18:34:12 MADAM CLERK.
18:34:15 BEFORE THE START OF EVERY HEARING IF YOU CAN SWEAR IN
18:34:17 THE WITNESSES FOR THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
18:34:19 >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HANDED.
18:34:21 DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH,
18:34:23 THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
18:34:25 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES.
18:34:31 >>CLERK: THANK YOU.
18:34:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:34:35 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES, SIR.
18:34:37 IF YOU COULD PLEASE SHARE -- IF YOU CAN SHARE MY
18:34:41 SCREEN.
18:34:54 IS MY SCREEN SHOWN?
18:34:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE IT.
18:34:58 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO, PLANNING DESIGN
18:35:01 COORDINATION.
18:35:06 FILE NO. AB2-20-06.
18:35:09 5908 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE AND EXISTING SITE WITH
18:35:13 EXISTING AB SALES THAT WAS APPROVED.
18:35:17 YOU ARE CURRENTLY ASKING FOR A SMALL VENUE BEER, WINE
18:35:23 AND LIQUOR, ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION, PACKAGE SALES AND
18:35:27 ALL PREMISE CONSUMPTION AS WELL THROUGH PACKAGE SALES.
18:35:34 THE PROPOSED TOTAL INDOORS AREA IS 6208 SQUARE FEET.
18:35:40 OUTDOOR SQUARE AREA 598 SQUARE FEET FOR TOTAL AB SALES
18:35:44 AREA OF 6806 SQUARE FEET TOTAL.
18:35:48 AND THE PROPOSED PARKING IS 40 PARKING SPACES, AND THE
18:35:52 HOURS OF OPERATION THAT ARE LISTED ON THE SITE PLAN AND
18:35:56 PROPOSED ARE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 9 A.M. THROUGH 12
18:35:59 P.M., SATURDAY 9 A.M. THROUGH 2 A.M.
18:36:06 AND SUNDAY, 11 A.M. THROUGH 12 P.M. THEY ARE ASKING FOR
18:36:07 TWO WAIVERS.
18:36:12 ONE ASSOCIATED WITH AB SALES DISTANCE AREA TO A
18:36:14 RESIDENTIAL USE.
18:36:17 THE CODE REQUIRES 250 FEET TO ANY RESIDENTIAL USE AND
18:36:20 THEY ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER TO REDUCE THAT DISTANCE
18:36:22 DOWN TO 208 FEET.
18:36:27 THE OTHER WAIVER THAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR OR RELATED TO
18:36:35 PARKING FOR ALLOWABLE DRIVE AISLE WIDTH FROM 18 TO 13
18:36:39 FEET AS WELL AS PARKING SPACE FROM 17.8 FEET DOWN TO
18:36:41 13.8 FEET.
18:36:47 THERE WERE NO OTHER AB ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN 250 FEET.
18:36:51 THERE IS A SITE PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AS I STATED.
18:36:57 THEY CURRENTLY HAVE AB SALES AREA FOR TOTAL OF 49 --
18:37:01 SORRY, 4091 SQUARE FEET INSIDE.
18:37:07 THEY ARE ASKING TO INCREASE THAT TO 6204 FEET.
18:37:11 THEY ARE ASKING ALSO TO REDUCE THE EXISTING OUTDOOR
18:37:19 SALES AREA BY APPROXIMATELY 56 SQUARE FEET.
18:37:27 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL
18:37:28 INTENSIVE.
18:37:32 IT IS ALONG ARMENIA AVENUE AND IT CORNERS TO IDLEWILD
18:37:37 TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY IS THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
18:37:38 JURISDICTION.
18:37:42 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM ARMENIA AVENUE, AS
18:37:44 WELL AS I SAID A CORNER LOT.
18:37:47 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OF THE SOUTHERN -- THE BOTTOM
18:37:52 PHOTO IS FROM IDLEWILD AVENUE.
18:37:56 THE SOUTHERN NEIGHBOR IS A RETAIL USE AND THE OTHER
18:37:59 NEIGHBOR IS A PERSONAL SERVICES USE.
18:38:03 TO THE EAST ARE A DIFFERENT PERSONAL SERVICES, RETAIL
18:38:08 AND COMMERCIAL USES ACROSS ARMENIA AND TO THE WEST WE
18:38:13 BEGIN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE
18:38:16 JURISDICTION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
18:38:21 YOU MAY UNSHARE MY SCREEN.
18:38:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
18:38:25 ANY QUESTIONS FOR --
18:38:27 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: I AM SO SORRY.
18:38:29 I WASN'T QUITE COMPLETE.
18:38:32 AS FAR AS RECOMMENDATIONS, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
18:38:36 COMPLIANCE STAFF DID FIND IN APPLICABLE WITH THE CODE
18:38:40 OF ORDINANCES.
18:38:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS MARY
18:38:43 SAMANIEGO?
18:38:51 HEARING NONE -- MR. SHELBY.
18:38:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WILL BE DOING THIS FOR EVERY
18:38:55 PETITIONER.
18:39:01 GOOD EVENING, MR. DIAZ, WERE YOU SWORN?
18:39:03 ARE YOU TESTIFYING HAVING BEEN SWORN.
18:39:05 >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:39:09 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU ARE AWARE THAT CITY AGREES AND
18:39:13 ASKS TO AFFIRM ON THE RECORD THAT THE 180 TIMELINE FOR
18:39:21 QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS IN 20-AND 16 FLORIDA STATUES IS
18:39:22 EXTENDED.
18:39:25 DO YOU CONFIRM WITH THAT AGREEMENT TO WAIVE THE 180
18:39:27 DAYS?
18:39:28 >> I DO.
18:39:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, SIR.
18:39:32 YOU MAY PROCEED, MR. CHAIRMAN, IF THAT IS ACCEPTABLE.
18:39:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:39:39 MR. DIAZ, GO AHEAD.
18:39:43 >> COUNCILMEMBERS, MY NAME IS JOSEPH DIAZ.
18:39:47 3242 HENDERSON BOULEVARD SWEET 310.
18:39:57 I FILED APPLICATION AB2-20-06 ON BEHALF OF FMLJUR, LLC.
18:39:59 MY CLIENT IS BOTH THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY AND
18:40:03 THE OWNER OPERATOR OF BLUE TORCH CIGARS WHICH IS THE
18:40:07 PREMISE THAT WE HAVE FILED THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON.
18:40:11 I HAVE FILED THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ON
18:40:15 BEHALF OF THIS SAME CLIENT AND BEFORE COUNCIL BACK IN
18:40:16 2016.
18:40:21 AT THAT TIME, WE WERE GRANTED VARIOUS WAIVERS:
18:40:29 SEPARATION FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, DRIVE AISLE,
18:40:32 DRIVE DEPTH AND NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.
18:40:34 36 WERE REQUIRED, 26 WERE PROVIDED.
18:40:37 UNDER THIS NEW APPLICATION, WE HAVE ACQUIRED ADDITIONAL
18:40:40 PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH.
18:40:44 AND SO WE NO LONGER NEED ANY PARKING WAIVERS.
18:40:48 WE ARE ONCE AGAIN ASKING THAT YOU JUST GIVE US BACK THE
18:40:51 SAME WAIVERS YOU GAVE US WITH RESPECT TO THE DISTANCE
18:40:55 SEPARATION OF THE DRIVE AISLE WIDTH AND THE DEPTH OF
18:40:58 THE PARKING SPACES.
18:41:04 IN REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN WITH MY CLIENT, WE WOULD
18:41:07 RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE ABILITY THAT IN BETWEEN THE
18:41:11 FIRST AND SECOND READING, WE COULD AMEND THE HOURS OF
18:41:15 OPERATION WHICH PRESENTLY PROVIDE THAT THEY WOULD BE
18:41:21 FROM 9:00 UNTIL 12:00 MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO READ
18:41:23 MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY.
18:41:26 AND THEN IT READS IN THE SITE PLAN THAT THE HOURS WOULD
18:41:29 BE FROM 9:00 UNTIL 2 A.M. ON SATURDAYS.
18:41:34 AND WE WOULD NOW READ FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS AND MAKE NO
18:41:38 REVISIONS WHATSOEVER TO THE HOURS OF OPERATION AS IT
18:41:42 PERTAINS TO SUNDAY.
18:41:46 ADDITIONAL SPACE THAT WE ARE ADDING TO THE SITE PLAN,
18:41:49 ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT YOU INITIALLY APPROVED IS NOTHING
18:41:54 MORE THAN A STORAGE SPACE WITH A WALK-IN COOLER.
18:41:58 THERE WILL BE NO MORE SPACE OPEN TO THE RETAIL PUBLIC.
18:42:01 IT IS MERELY MORE STORAGE SPACE FOR US.
18:42:05 OUR BUSINESS HAS GROWN, AND WE NEED MORE SPACE.
18:42:07 AND IF, IN FACT, YOU GRANT US OUR APPLICATION, WE WILL
18:42:10 HAVE TO STOCK MORE DIFFERENT BRANDS OF LIQUOR TO BE
18:42:15 ABLE TO OPERATE THE BUSINESS.
18:42:18 I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT THE STAFF REPORT, YOU WILL SEE
18:42:22 THAT THE STAFF HAS FOUND OUR APPLICATION TO BE
18:42:23 CONSISTENT.
18:42:27 THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION TO
18:42:32 OUR APPLICATION.
18:42:36 WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE OUR
18:42:37 APPLICATION.
18:42:40 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO
18:42:40 ANSWER THEM FOR YOU.
18:42:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. DIAZ.
18:42:47 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS FOR THE APPLICANT?
18:42:50 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
18:42:52 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:42:57 MR. DIAZ, ANY PLAN FOR AMPLIFIED MUSIC IN THE OUTSIDE
18:42:58 PORTION OF THIS?
18:43:02 >> NONE WHATSOEVER.
18:43:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOUR APPLICANT WILL BE AMENABLE TO
18:43:09 STATE NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC IN THE OUTSIDE PORTION.
18:43:11 >> WE CERTAINLY WOULD.
18:43:13 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. DIAZ.
18:43:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM ANY OTHER
18:43:18 COUNCILMEMBERS?
18:43:22 ALL RIGHT, HEARING AND SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE
18:43:26 FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
18:43:28 ITEM NUMBER 2?
18:43:35 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC?
18:43:36 CLERK --
18:43:38 >>CLERK: NO --
18:43:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ON STANDBY --
18:43:55 >>CLERK: NO, NO ONE HERE.
18:43:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IS THERE SOMEBODY FROM
18:44:05 THE CONVENTION CENTER?
18:44:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ARE YOU SPEAKING ON ITEM NUMBER
18:44:08 TWO?
18:44:12 >> NO ONE FROM THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON THAT ITEM.
18:44:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:44:15 SEEING NONE --
18:44:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:44:24 MAN MANISCALCO A MOTION AND SECOND TO CLOSE.
18:44:28 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:44:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:44:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:44:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:44:37 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:44:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:44:40 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:44:44 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:44:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMEMBER JOSEPH CITRO, WOULD
18:44:52 YOU LIKE TO TAKE ITEM NUMBER TWO?
18:44:57 I AM SORRY?
18:44:59 YOU ARE MUTED --
18:45:02 >> SORRY, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY IN THE STAFF REPORT
18:45:05 THE HOURS OF OPERATION, THE CLOSING TIME IS 12 P.M. SO
18:45:10 I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY IF THAT IS MIDNIGHT BECAUSE
18:45:13 SHOULD BE 12 A.M.
18:45:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. DIAZ.
18:45:19 >> INTENDED TO BE MIDNIGHT.
18:45:21 IT IS WHAT IT IS INTENDED TO BE.
18:45:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A CORRECTION FOR 12 A.M.
18:45:28 >> A.M. ON MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY AND ALSO ON SUNDAY.
18:45:28 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
18:45:31 THANK YOU.
18:45:38 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FRIDAY AND SATURDAY 9 A.M. TO 2 A.M.,
18:45:40 MR. DIAZ, IS THAT CORRECT?
18:45:41 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
18:45:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
18:45:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO THE ISSUE OF AMPLIFIED
18:45:47 SOUND.
18:45:49 WILL THAT BE PART OF THE MOTION?
18:45:50 >> WE HAVE NO OBJECTION.
18:45:52 WE WILL SO STATE ON THE SITE PLAN.
18:45:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY, THANK YOU, SIR.
18:45:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HEARING THOSE CORRECTIONS,
18:46:00 COUNCILMAN CITRO, TAKE IT AWAY.
18:46:04 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE, SIR.
18:46:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, I HAVE THAT MR. SHELBY, THANK
18:46:07 YOU.
18:46:14 IN FILE NUMBER AB2-20-06, THE SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE FOR
18:46:17 FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE APPROVING A
18:46:21 SPECIAL USE PERMIT S-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES,
18:46:26 SMALL VENUE CONSUMPTION ON-PREMISE AND PACKAGE SALES,
18:46:30 OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF
18:46:33 BEVERAGES REGARDLESS OF ALCOHOL CONTENT BEER, WINE AND
18:46:37 LIQUOR ON CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED
18:46:41 590 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, AS MORE
18:46:44 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3, PROVIDING THAT ALL
18:46:49 ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE
18:46:54 REPEALED, REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2016-74 PROVIDING
18:46:56 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:47:00 INCLUDING ALL WAIVERS AND CORRECTIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:47:05 SECOND READING AS THE PETITIONER HAS MET THE BURDEN OF
18:47:07 PROOF AND THE USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
18:47:10 PROPERTIES AND THE APPLICANT AGAIN HAS MET THE BURDEN
18:47:14 OF PROOF, COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY THE
18:47:17 GRANTING OF WAIVERS AND THE APPLICATION AFTER GRANTING
18:47:21 WAIVERS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL
18:47:27 STANDARDS OF SECTION 27-129 OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE.
18:47:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
18:47:30 DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THE MOTION?
18:47:32 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
18:47:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WAS GOING TO SECOND IT AND JUST
18:47:38 TO CLARIFY THE CHANGES TO THE MOTION -- THE MOTION
18:47:41 INCLUDED THE CHANGES.
18:47:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, CORRECTION BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:47:46 SECOND READING.
18:47:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND THE ADDITION OF THE HOURS OF
18:47:53 OPERATION AND THE NO AMPLIFIED SOUND, IS THAT CORRECT?
18:47:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO AMPLIFIED SOUND AND I THINK THE
18:48:02 CHANGES IN TIMES WERE ALREADY STATED BY THE APPLICANT.
18:48:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:48:07 THE MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO AND I HEARD COUNCILMAN
18:48:08 MIRANDA'S VOICE FIRST.
18:48:10 ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:48:12 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:48:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:48:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:48:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:48:24 >>CLERK: CARLSON --
18:48:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:48:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:48:30 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:48:33 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD SEPTEMBER 10
18:48:37 AT 5:01 P.M.
18:48:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:48:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR.
18:48:48 NOW MOVE TO ITEM --
18:48:51 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: MARY SAMANIEGO.
18:48:58 ITEM NUMBER 3 IS SU2-19-11.
18:49:01 I AM READY TO BE SWORN.
18:49:06 >> DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE
18:49:07 TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
18:49:14 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES.
18:49:22 SPECIAL USE 2 GENERALLY LOCATED 4901 AND 405 NORTH
18:49:32 HABANA AVENUE AND 402 NORTH ARRAWANA AVENUE.
18:49:35 DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:49:41 >>DANNY COLLINS: CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN?
18:49:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIRMAN?
18:49:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
18:49:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: -- I AM GOING TO HAVE TO EXCUSE
18:49:48 MYSELF.
18:49:54 I GAVE THE LABOR DEPARTMENT THE FORM.
18:49:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:49:57 MR. SHELBY, DID YOU HEAR THAT?
18:49:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN.
18:50:02 MR. MIRANDA, WAS THAT DELIVERED TO THE CLERK?
18:50:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT HAS IT.
18:50:06 I GAVE IT TO THEM.
18:50:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU GAVE IT TO THEM?
18:50:10 THEY WILL HAVE TO MAKE SURE TO SEND IT OVER TO THE
18:50:11 CLERK'S OFFICE.
18:50:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, MR. COLLINS, TAKE IT
18:50:15 AWAY.
18:50:19 >>DANNY COLLINS: EVERYBODY SEE MY SCREEN?
18:50:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
18:50:24 >>DANNY COLLINS: GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
18:50:32 OUR FIRST CASE WITH THE PLAZA TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:50:38 THIS IS A MAP ON THE SUBJECT SITE AND ON THE PROPERTY.
18:50:42 THE SUBJECT SITE IS -- LOCATED ON NORTH HABANA AVENUE
18:50:52 AND ALSO MORE ON WESTERN PORTION OF WEST VIOLET STREET.
18:50:56 HERE IS ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL.
18:50:58 AND ADOPTED THE LAND USE MAP.
18:51:01 THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 35
18:51:03 CATEGORY.
18:51:10 AND THERE IS A PORTION IN THE COMMERCIAL 10 CATEGORY.
18:51:14 RESIDENTIAL 10 JUST ON THE SIDE OF HABANA.
18:51:18 AND TRANSITIONS OVER TO RES-35.
18:51:25 THIS AREA IN THE BLUE IS PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC.
18:51:28 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST,
18:51:33 THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING DAY CARE INCOMPATIBLE TO
18:51:35 THE SURROUNDING AREA.
18:51:37 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A PARKING WAIVER WITH 11
18:51:40 PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT.
18:51:42 THE REQUIREMENT IS 22 SPACES.
18:51:47 AS A RESULT, PARKING HAVE POSITIVE IMPACTS TO THE
18:51:50 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH IS INCONSISTENT TO THE
18:51:51 NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION POLICIES.
18:51:54 IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED USE OF THE SITE IS
18:52:00 INCOMPATIBLE TO THE PATTERN NORTH.
18:52:04 AND THE REQUEST ENCROACHES OFF THIS SINGLE-FAMILY
18:52:09 NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE SUBJECT SITE, INCONSISTENT WITH THE
18:52:11 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:52:14 BASED ON THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FUNDS IN
18:52:17 INCONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:52:20 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE
18:52:21 FOR QUESTIONS.
18:52:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM
18:52:24 COUNCILMEMBERS?
18:52:25 NO?
18:52:26 ALL RIGHT.
18:52:27 NEXT SPEAKER.
18:52:28 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU, MARY SAMANIEGO AGAIN.
18:52:34 CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN.
18:52:45 OKAY.
18:52:46 THANK YOU.
18:52:53 THIS IS, AGAIN, SU-2-19-11 REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE 2 IN
18:52:59 A RESIDENTIAL RS-50 AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONES FOR A
18:53:00 DARE CARE FACILITY.
18:53:05 THE OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANT STAFF
18:53:06 FOUND IN INCONSISTENT.
18:53:10 THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR TWO WAIVERS, ONE TO REDUCE
18:53:13 THE TOTAL REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FROM 26 TO
18:53:14 11.
18:53:21 THAT IS A 42% REDUCTION, AS WELL AS TO 29-12 ONE OF THE
18:53:26 SPECIAL USE CRITERIA FOR DAY CARE OF ACCESS TO A LOCAL
18:53:31 STREET NORTH ARRAWANA AVENUE TO AN ARTERIAL COLLECTOR.
18:53:34 HERE IS THE SITE PLAN THEY ARE PROPOSING.
18:53:39 THEY CURRENTLY OPERATE A DAY CARE FACILITY IN THESE TWO
18:53:40 BUILDINGS.
18:53:44 THEY RECENTLY ACQUIRED A RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH THAT
18:53:48 FRONTS ARRAWANA AND IS ON VIOLET.
18:53:50 THEY ARE WANTING TO INCORPORATE THAT RESIDENTIAL
18:53:54 STRUCTURE AND CONVERT IT INTO A DAY CARE USE AND
18:54:00 INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE OVERALL DAY CARE FACILITY.
18:54:06 AS YOU CAN SEE, BECAUSE OF THE THREE SEPARATE
18:54:11 STRUCTURES, THERE ARE SOME PARKING TO THE NORTH OF THIS
18:54:15 STRUCTURE ON ARRAWANA AND THE EXISTING PARKING COMES
18:54:20 OFF HABANA WITH QUEUEING ONE WAY OFF HABANA CLOSE TO
18:54:26 THE INTERSECTION AND THEN EXITING IN THAT AREA.
18:54:32 HERE IS AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THE APPLICATION SITE.
18:54:33 IT IS THREE PROPERTIES.
18:54:37 AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE
18:54:43 WEST AND TO THE EAST WITH HABANA A MIX OF RM USES AS
18:54:47 WELL AS LIGHT COMMERCIAL IN THE CN ZONING DISTRICT AS
18:54:50 WELL AS SOME RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES.
18:54:55 THERE IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING FACILITY FROM
18:55:02 HABANA, FROM VIOLET.
18:55:06 GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN.
18:55:08 I APOLOGIZE.
18:55:12 ONE MOMENT.
18:55:19 AS FAR AS CHANGES, THERE ARE SOME MINOR CHANGES BETWEEN
18:55:23 FIRST AND SECOND READING FOR PLANNING, DESIGN AND
18:55:24 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:55:26 PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND IN INCONSISTENT WITH THE
18:55:31 42% PARKING REDUCTION AS THE CITY COUNCIL KNOWS.
18:55:34 WE REQUIRE PARKING BASED ON EMPLOYEES WITH THE TOTAL
18:55:36 NUMBER OF CHILDREN.
18:55:42 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A TOTAL OF 100 CHILDREN
18:55:44 THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE.
18:55:49 BASED ON 100 CHILDREN AND THE RANGE OF AGES, THE
18:55:51 REQUIREMENT IS 26 PARKING SPACES.
18:55:55 THEY ARE ASKING TO GO DOWN TO 11.
18:55:58 THERE ARE SOME CHANGES ALSO FROM TRANSPORTATION BETWEEN
18:56:01 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
18:56:04 MODIFICATIONS TO THEIR SOLID WASTE PROVISION THAT'S
18:56:06 THEY ARE PROPOSING.
18:56:11 THEY DID FIND IT INCONSISTENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
18:56:14 FOUND IT CONSISTENT AS WELL WITH SOME MINOR CHANGES
18:56:16 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS FAR AS ADEQUATELY
18:56:21 SHOWING THE PROTECTIVE RADII FOR THE TREE.
18:56:26 SEEING THAT, THE CRITERIA FOUND IN YOUR STAFF REPORT,
18:56:32 OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT STAFF DID FIND IT INCONSISTENT
18:56:35 BASED ON THE STREET ACCESS AND PARKING WAIVER.
18:56:36 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
18:56:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:56:42 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
18:56:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CHAIR.
18:56:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:56:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: 22% OF REDUCTION IN SPACE -- MAYBE MY
18:56:51 SHEET IS WRONG.
18:56:52 I HEARD 26.
18:57:00 ON MY SHEET I HAD 19 AND 16 PARKING SPACES?
18:57:04 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: WHAT SHEET ARE YOU REFERRING TO SIR?
06:58:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I DON'T HAVE THAT ON THE SHEET.
06:58:02 I HAVE 19 TO 16.
06:58:07 26 TO 11.
06:58:07 OKAY.
06:58:14 THANK YOU, CHAIR.
06:58:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:58:19 ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
06:58:21 MR. SHELBY.
06:58:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES.
06:58:28 THE PETITIONER IS PRESENT.
06:58:31 IS THAT CORRECT?
06:58:38 I CAN'T HEAR HIM.
06:58:40 >> YES.
06:58:41 I'M HERE.
06:58:42 >> THANK YOU.
06:58:43 SIR, HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN?
06:58:44 ARE YOU --
06:58:47 >> YES, SIR.
06:58:47 YES, SIR.
06:58:48 >> OKAY.
06:58:48 ARE YOU AWARE THAT THE CITY AGREES AND ASKS EACH APPLICANT
06:58:52 TO CONFIRM YOUR AGREEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT THE 180-DAY
06:58:57 TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS AS SET
06:59:01 FORTH IN 27-148-E AND 166.03 OF FLORIDA STATUTES IS
06:59:06 EXTENDED.
06:59:06 IS THAT YOUR INTENTION, SIR, TO AGREE TO THAT WAIVER OF 180
06:59:09 DAYS?
06:59:10 >> YES, SIR.
06:59:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
06:59:12 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:59:13 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
06:59:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:59:17 APPLICANT, IF YOU'D LIKE TO PROCEED.
06:59:19 >> YES.
06:59:19 HOW YOU DOING?
06:59:20 MY CLIENTS, THEY --
06:59:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
06:59:26 >> YES.
06:59:27 MY NAME IS NEIDEL VIAMONTES.
06:59:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
06:59:34 >> MY CLIENT BOUGHT THIS DAY CARE ABOUT A YEAR AGO.
06:59:37 AND WE STARTED IN THE PROCESS TO DO IT POTENTIALLY.
06:59:45 IT WAS CONSISTENT ALREADY.
06:59:46 WE DECIDED TO OPERATE OTHER PROPERTIES TO THE DAY CARE.
06:59:55 THE ONE ON THE BACK AND ONE ON THE SIDE OF IT BECAUSE
06:59:57 ORIGINALLY THEY DIDN'T HAVE IT AS, YOU KNOW, THE COMMERCIAL
07:00:02 USE PROPERTY.
07:00:04 THEY HAD AS A RESIDENTIAL.
07:00:05 SO WE'RE TRYING TO INCORPORATE ALL THAT INTO ONE PROPERTY.
07:00:10 THE ONE USE.
07:00:11 SO WE TRIED -- WE DIDN'T -- WE FOUND OUT THAT OUR PARKING
07:00:17 SPACES WERE NOT SUFFICIENT ENOUGH, BUT WE DON'T HAVE, FOR
07:00:24 EXAMPLE, WE ONLY HAVE RIGHT NOW 90 KIDS.
07:00:28 WE'RE TRYING TO BUMP IT UP TO 100, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANY
07:00:33 OTHER (INAUDIBLE) AND I KNOW THAT'S BECAUSE OF THE PARKING
07:00:38 SPACES.
07:00:39 WE CAN ONLY HAVE RIGHT NOW (INAUDIBLE) AND THE DIRECTOR.
07:00:44 THAT'S WHY WE ONLY WANTED THE PETITION FOR 11 PARKING
07:00:49 SPACES.
07:00:50 THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH FOR THE DAY CARE.
07:00:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:00:58 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
07:01:00 >> THAT'S IT.
07:01:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:01:03 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:01:09 >> I DO HAVE ANOTHER COMMENT.
07:01:12 I'M SORRY.
07:01:13 WE ALSO WANT TO EXPAND FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AND YOUR SIDE SO
07:01:17 THE (INAUDIBLE) WILL HAVE MORE SPACE.
07:01:20 AND THE OTHER SIDE IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
07:01:22 I THINK WE NEED MORE SPACE FOR THE KIDS.
07:01:25 WE'RE TRYING TO CONVERT THE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE INTO AN
07:01:33 AFTER-SCHOOL PERHAPS FOR THE KIDS.
07:01:37 ALSO, SAME THING WITH THE (INAUDIBLE).
07:01:39 WE'RE TRYING TO DIVIDE IT SO INSTEAD OF HAVING 20 KIDS,
07:01:43 WE'LL HAVE 10 KIDS PER CLASSROOM.
07:01:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:01:48 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:01:50 ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:01:55 HEARING AND SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC
07:01:58 THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 3?
07:02:02 IF WE HAVE ANYONE.
07:02:09 DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS FOR ITEM 3?
07:02:14 >> THERE IS NO ONE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.
07:02:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU SAID THERE IS NO ONE?
07:02:21 >> NO ONE.
07:02:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:02:23 THANK YOU.
07:02:26 >> POINT OF ORDER.
07:02:27 MR. SHELBY, YOU'RE NOT -- (INAUDIBLE) JUST TRYING TO SPEED
07:02:32 THINGS UP, BELIEVE IT OR NOT.
07:02:34 WHEN THE CHAIRMAN WANTS TO -- OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING OR CLOSE
07:02:40 A PUBLIC HEARING, COULD WE DO IT BY JUST SAYING WITHOUT
07:02:44 OBJECTION, I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN OR CLOSE THIS PUBLIC
07:02:49 HEARING.
07:02:49 WITHOUT -- ESPECIALLY SINCE WE'RE IN THE ROLL CALL
07:02:56 SITUATION.
07:02:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE RULES STATE EVERYTHING YOU SEE HAS TO
07:02:59 BE DONE BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:03:01 FRANKLY THAT'S TO PROTECT CITY COUNCIL ON ITS OFFICIAL
07:03:04 ACTION AND TO HAVE THAT RECORDED.
07:03:06 I SUSPECT THAT IF YOU WANT TO DO IT ON THINGS THAT HAVE NO
07:03:12 GREAT CONSEQUENCE THAT'S JUST DONE TO MOVE THE PROCESS ALONG
07:03:16 AND THERE IS NO DELIBERATION INVOLVED, I GUESS YOU CAN
07:03:19 MOVE -- WAIVE THE RULES FOR THIS PARTICULAR HEARING AND THEN
07:03:24 SUGGEST THAT THOSE BE DONE BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT WITHOUT
07:03:32 OBJECTION IF THAT WOULD SPEED THINGS UP.
07:03:35 CERTAINLY YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT MAKING SURE THE VOTE
07:03:38 IS PROPERLY RECORDED FOR OFFICIAL ACTION.
07:03:40 MS. WELLS, DO YOU HAVE A FEELING ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
07:03:43 PERHAPS?
07:03:44 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY.
07:03:49 CATE WELLS, CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.
07:03:52 I THINK FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE AS SUGGESTED BY COUNCILMAN
07:03:56 DINGFELDER WAIVING THE RULES WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.
07:04:04 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, WITH THAT SAID AND IN THE SPIRIT IT'S MEANT
07:04:07 TO BE, FRANKLY I THINK WE SHOULD DO THIS WITH ALL OUR
07:04:12 VIRTUAL MEETINGS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
07:04:14 I'LL MOVE TO WAIVE THAT RULE AND SUGGEST THAT IN THE ACTIONS
07:04:24 SUCH AS OPENING AND CLOSING IT --
07:04:31 >> IF I CAN MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THE PEOPLE NOT MUTING
07:04:35 THEIR MICS.
07:04:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MIRANDA, IF YOU COULD MUTE YOUR
07:04:42 MICROPHONE.
07:04:42 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:04:44 SO WE HEARD FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER THAT WE WAIVE THE
07:04:49 RULES WHEN IT COMES TO ITEMS SUCH AS OPENING AND CLOSING
07:04:53 HEARINGS, AND I CAN JUST ASK IF THERE IS ANY OBJECTION AND
07:04:59 SPEED IT UP.
07:04:59 A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
07:05:03 A SECOND?
07:05:03 >> SECOND.
07:05:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES.
07:05:08 WE'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL AND NEW RULES ARE IN PLACE.
07:05:13 ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:05:17 >> VIERA?
07:05:21 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:05:22 YES.
07:05:25 >> DINGFELDER?
07:05:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:05:29 >> MANISCALCO?
07:05:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:05:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:05:42 >> MOTION CARRIES WITH MIRANDA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE AND
07:05:47 CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
07:05:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
07:05:51 THERE WAS NOBODY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
07:05:53 NOW WE ASK IS THERE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING OR
07:05:58 I MOVE TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THERE IS ANY
07:06:02 OBJECTION.
07:06:03 WOULD THAT BE PROPER, MR. SHELBY?
07:06:05 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU COULD STATE -- YOU EITHER DO THE MOTION
07:06:08 OR JUST SAY IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO CLOSING THE PUBLIC
07:06:12 HEARING AND GO BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
07:06:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SOUNDS GOOD.
07:06:19 IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING?
07:06:21 SEEING NO OBJECTION BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT WE CLOSED THE
07:06:26 PUBLIC HEARING AND NOW GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER DINGFELDER.
07:06:30 IF YOU'D LIKE TO TAKE THE SUBSTITUTE FOR ITEM NUMBER 3.
07:06:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I'M GOING TO PASS
07:06:37 TONIGHT ON MOTIONS BUT I'LL MAKE UP FOR IT NEXT TIME.
07:06:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SOUNDS GOOD.
07:06:43 I APPRECIATE IT.
07:06:44 COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES, YOU'RE NEXT IN LINE.
07:06:47 WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE A SUBSTITUTE FOR ITEM 3?
07:06:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 3.
07:06:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
07:06:53 THE SUBSTITUTE.
07:06:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE FIRST READING, CONSIDERATION, APPROVING
07:06:57 THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUE TO APPROVE A DAYCARE IN RS-50
07:07:04 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY IN THE DISTRICT AND 4901 AND 4905
07:07:09 WITH SAVANNAH AVENUE AND NORTH ARRAWANA AVENUE IN THE CITY
07:07:14 OF TAMPA FOR -- AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HERE PROVIDING THE
07:07:18 EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:07:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:07:21 WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES.
07:07:23 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
07:07:25 >> SECOND.
07:07:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
07:07:29 ROLL CALL BECAUSE WE'RE VOTING ON THIS SPECIAL USE.
07:07:34 ROLL CALL VOTE PLEASE.
07:07:37 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:07:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
07:07:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:07:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:07:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:07:51 >> AND MIRANDA.
07:07:52 MOTION CARRIES WITH MIRANDA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.
07:07:58 >> CORRECTION.
07:08:08 MOTION CARRIES WITH MIRANDA ABSTAINING.
07:08:11 CARLSON ABSENT.
07:08:13 SECOND READING SEPTEMBER 10 AT 5:01 P.M.
07:08:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:08:18 ITEM NUMBER 4, WE TOOK CARE OF.
07:08:25 >> DID WE?
07:08:26 >> ITEM NUMBER 4 NEEDS TO BE HEARD, SIR.
07:08:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I'M SORRY.
07:08:29 I SCRIBBLED HERE.
07:08:32 GO AHEAD WITH ITEM NUMBER 4.
07:08:34 >> DO I NEED TO BE SWORN IN?
07:08:40 >> IF YOU CAN JUST GET INTO THE HABIT WITH EVERY HEARING
07:08:42 REQUIRING EVERYBODY INVOLVED AND CAPABLE OF BEING SWORN IN,
07:08:46 PLEASE BE SWORN.
07:08:48 >> DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE
07:08:51 TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
07:08:53 >> I DO.
07:08:54 >> THANK YOU.
07:08:56 >> OKAY.
07:08:57 PLANNING AND DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
07:08:59 ITEM NUMBER 4 IS FILE NUMBER REZ-20-24 FOR 104 WEST
07:09:06 HOLLYWOOD STREET.
07:09:07 THEY ARE CURRENTLY ZONED SHRS WHICH IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
07:09:12 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AND SH-CI WHICH IS SEMINOLE
07:09:17 HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND REQUESTING TO BE ZONED TO
07:09:20 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
07:09:22 I'LL REFER TO DANNY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:09:27 >> FACE THE SCREEN, PLEASE.
07:09:43 CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?
07:09:58 GOOD EVENING.
07:09:59 THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
07:10:01 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
07:10:02 OUR FIRST CASE IS AN ESSENTIAL PLANNING TAMPA DISTRICTS AND
07:10:06 MORE SPECIFICALLY THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
07:10:09 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS TERRACE PARK WHICH
07:10:13 IS LOCATED TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
07:10:16 SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN TRANSIT.
07:10:19 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE LOCAL CITY EVACUATION ZONE.
07:10:25 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
07:10:28 PROPERTIES.
07:10:28 THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST HOLLYWOOD
07:10:32 STREET.
07:10:33 THIS IS NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
07:10:34 YOU CAN SEE THE AREA TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH IS PREDOMINANTLY
07:10:38 RESIDENTIAL AND THERE IS COMMERCIAL USES ALONG (INAUDIBLE)
07:10:43 AVENUE.
07:10:46 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:10:49 YOU'LL SEE THE SITE IS SHOWN HERE.
07:10:53 THE COLOR REPRESENTS CMU-35.
07:10:57 THEN THE RED REPRESENTS CC-35.
07:11:00 THIS AREA TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 20.
07:11:08 YOU'LL SEE NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE IS NOT ONLY COMMERCIAL, THIS
07:11:12 AREA IS THE WEST SIDE.
07:11:16 SHOWN IN THE GREEN COLOR IS RECREATION OPEN SPACE.
07:11:20 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND UPON THE
07:11:23 PROPOSED ZONING, COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE TO THE CHARACTER
07:11:28 OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND EXISTING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
07:11:31 PATTERN STATED UNDER CMU (INAUDIBLE) DESIGNATIONS.
07:11:42 (MUFFLED AUDIO)
07:11:44 THE SITE SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS IN THE
07:11:48 CORRIDORS.
07:11:49 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE COMMISSION STAFF FINDS
07:11:52 THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
07:11:56 PLAN.
07:11:57 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
07:12:00 I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:12:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:12:02 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:12:05 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
07:12:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:12:11 IS THAT RYAN WHO GAVE THIS?
07:12:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
07:12:15 I HAVEN'T DONE THE PRESENTATION YET.
07:12:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M SORRY.
07:12:18 I'M SORRY, DANNY.
07:12:20 DANNY, YOU SAID IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING USES.
07:12:29 IS THAT CORRECT?
07:12:32 >> THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF FOUND IT COMPATIBLE
07:12:34 WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT.
07:12:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
07:12:39 BECAUSE IT APPEARS TO ME, AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M
07:12:43 WRONG, IT LOOKS LIKE TWO DOORS DOWN -- WELL, AND ACROSS THE
07:12:50 STREET FROM THE SUBJECT HOUSE, I GUESS WHAT I'M CONCERNED
07:12:57 ABOUT IS THAT THE HOUSE IS NEXT TO THE EXISTING USE WHICH IS
07:13:05 THE GRANITE AND MARBLE, BUT THEN THE NEXT USE DOWN IS AN
07:13:10 EMPTY LOT, THEN YOU'VE GOT A BRAND NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE,
07:13:17 AND ACROSS THE STREET IT LOOKS LIKE A COUPLE OF BRAND NEW
07:13:20 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES.
07:13:24 YOU KNOW, SO ISN'T THERE A CONCERN FROM THE PLANNING
07:13:28 COMMISSION THAT THIS IS AN INTRUSIVE COMMERCIAL USE ON THE
07:13:34 OTHERWISE RESIDENTIAL STREET?
07:13:35 WE ALL UNDERSTAND THAT FLORIDA AVENUE IS FLORIDA AVENUE, AND
07:13:38 IT'S GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF INTENSIVE UNITS.
07:13:40 HOW FAR DO WE WANT TO LET IT INTRUDE DOWN INTO THE STREET?
07:13:45 >> THIS AREA, THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS
07:13:51 CMU-35 CATEGORY WHICH IS COMMERCIAL MIXED USE CATEGORY.
07:13:56 THERE ARE RESIDENCES TO THE WEST OF THE SITE.
07:14:03 PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPLICANT SHOULD PROPERLY BUFFER
07:14:09 FROM ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTS AND STRUCTURES.
07:14:13 SO I REVIEW THE SITE AND SURROUND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP,
07:14:19 WE FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT.
07:14:26 AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH CM-35.
07:14:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
07:14:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:14:32 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS?
07:14:35 IF THERE ARE NONE --
07:14:37 >> MR. CHAIR?
07:14:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:14:39 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
07:14:41 GO AHEAD.
07:14:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:14:43 I COULDN'T CHIME IN IN TIME.
07:14:45 QUESTION.
07:14:45 IS THIS COMPATIBLE WITH TODAY'S USE?
07:14:47 IF WE'RE LOOKING AT LONG-TERM, IS THIS GOING TO BE
07:14:51 COMPATIBLE FOR FUTURE DENSITY IN WHICH PEOPLE WANT TO WALK
07:14:54 TO A RESTAURANT OR TO SOME SORT OF RETAIL, SMALL RETAIL.
07:15:00 IS THAT COMPATIBLE WITH TODAY OR FUTURE?
07:15:09 >> PLANNING AND DESIGN COORDINATION.
07:15:11 AGAIN, I'D LIKE TO GIVE MY PRESENTATION BUT I'LL ANSWER THE
07:15:14 QUESTION BEFORE I DO THAT.
07:15:16 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I APOLOGIZE.
07:15:17 GIVE YOUR PRESENTATION AND IF NECESSARY I'LL RE-ASK.
07:15:19 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
07:15:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:15:21 ANYTHING ELSE?
07:15:22 ALL RIGHT.
07:15:22 GO AHEAD WITH THE NEXT PRESENTER, PLEASE.
07:15:25 >> THANK YOU.
07:15:28 RYAN MANASSEY.
07:15:31 ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZONING 20-24.
07:15:33 I'M SORRY.
07:15:34 CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?
07:15:45 THANK YOU.
07:15:46 AGAIN, THEY ARE CURRENTLY ZONED SHRS AND SHCI AND THEY'RE
07:15:51 REQUESTING THROUGH THE REZONING TO BE REQUESTED SEMINOLE
07:15:55 HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
07:15:56 THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY AGAIN AT 104 WEST HOLLYWOOD STREET.
07:16:00 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 106 BY 120 FEET OF A
07:16:05 TOTAL AREA OF 12,70020 SQUARE FEET.
07:16:11 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE LOT TO THE WEST OF WEST
07:16:13 HOLLYWOOD STREET AND FLORIDA AVENUE INTERSECTIONS, AND THE
07:16:17 PROPERTY IS SPLIT ZONED WHICH IS SHRS AND SH-CI TO THE EAST.
07:16:24 IT'S SINGLE FAMILY USES AND VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO
07:16:27 THE NORTH WITHIN SHRS AND SH-CI ZONING DISTRICTS.
07:16:33 RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY USE TO THE SOUTH WITHIN THE SHRS AND
07:16:37 SH-CI ZONING DISTRICT AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THE EAST
07:16:41 WITHIN THE SH-CI ZONING DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
07:16:45 FAMILY USE TO THE WEST WITHIN THE SHRS.
07:16:52 PROVIDED IN YOUR STAFF REPORTS, OBVIOUSLY THIS IS A REZONING
07:16:56 SO THERE ARE NO WAIVERS INVOLVED.
07:16:58 THE APPLICANT IF APPROVED WOULD HAVE TO APPLY FOR ANY
07:17:03 PERMITS FOR THE LOSS AND MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
07:17:06 SHCI ZONING DISTRICTS ON PAGE 2 OF THE STAFF REPORTS.
07:17:10 THIS IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS SO THERE IS ADDITIONAL DESIGN
07:17:12 CRITERIA THAT MUST BE MET.
07:17:14 THERE IS A HISTORIC LANDMARK STRUCTURE AS POINTED OUT ON THE
07:17:21 AERIAL ON SCREEN.
07:17:23 IT'S THE TOWER AT FLORIDA AVENUE.
07:17:25 THAT WAS 10/26/1989.
07:17:29 AGAIN, IN THE STAFF REPORT, ON PAGE 7 IT DOES REPORT THE
07:17:33 ZONING AS SHRS AND SH-CI AND IT WAS C-2 UNDER CHAPTER 43.
07:17:39 AS DANNY STATED FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IT'S MIXED USE
07:17:43 35 AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 LAND USE WHICH GIVES THEM THE
07:17:47 OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY FOR THE REZONING AND PRESENT IT BEFORE
07:17:49 COUNCIL.
07:17:50 THERE IS NO SPECIAL USE APPLICATIONS OR OTHER REZONING
07:17:55 APPLICATIONS OR CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATIONS ON THIS PROPERTY
07:17:59 AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT.
07:18:00 AFTER PAGE 7 OF YOUR STAFF REPORT, IT LISTS ALL THE
07:18:03 PERMITTED USES THAT IF THEY ARE TONIGHT WOULD BE ALLOWED IN
07:18:08 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
07:18:12 I'D LIKE TO SHOW YOU SOME OF THE PICTURES ON SCREEN.
07:18:14 STARTING FROM THE TOP, THE SUBJECT SITE AS THEY'RE LABELED.
07:18:19 THERE IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE AND NEXT TO THAT IS VACANT.
07:18:22 THAT'S THE ENTIRE SITE.
07:18:23 IT IS SPLIT ZONED.
07:18:25 THE WEST NEIGHBOR IS 108 WEST HOLLYWOOD.
07:18:28 THE NORTH NEIGHBOR IS 7900 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
07:18:33 AGAIN, THIS IS A -- NOT DUPLICATE PICTURE BUT THE 7900 NORTH
07:18:37 FLORIDA IS ALSO A LOT NEXT TO THE GRANITE ESTABLISHMENT.
07:18:42 THE NORTH NEIGHBOR IS 109 WEST HOLLYWOOD AND AS SOME OF THE
07:18:47 COUNCIL MEMBERS ELUDED, THAT'S A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
07:18:52 RESIDENCE AS WELL AS 108.
07:18:55 WITH CONSIDERATION WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE AND STAFF
07:18:57 REZONING REPORT, THE DEVELOPMENT HAS REVIEWED THE
07:19:00 APPLICATION AND WE FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
07:19:05 TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
07:19:06 STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
07:19:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:19:11 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:19:13 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:19:18 BEFORE WE GO TO THE APPLICANT, MR. SHELBY.
07:19:22 OR COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
07:19:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:19:26 I THOUGHT MR. CITRO ALSO HAD A QUESTION.
07:19:29 MY QUESTION IS THE SAME TO YOU, RYAN, AS IT WAS TO DANNY.
07:19:36 SO THE LITTLE HOUSE THAT IS THE EASTERLY PART OF THE SUBJECT
07:19:43 SITE ALREADY HAD SOME COMMERCIAL ZONING ON IT.
07:19:49 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL ZONING, RIGHT?
07:19:54 >> THE SUBJECT SITE, YES.
07:19:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH.
07:19:58 PUT UP THE HOUSE PICTURES AGAIN, IF YOU WOULD.
07:20:01 OKAY.
07:20:01 THE LITTLE HOUSE THERE HAD THE COMMERCIAL ZONING.
07:20:05 IT'S NOT UNREASONABLE TO LEAVE THEM WITH A COMMERCIAL
07:20:08 ZONING.
07:20:08 THEN WE JUMP ONE MORE LOT TO THE WEST WHICH IS IMMEDIATELY
07:20:14 ADJACENT TO 108 WEST HOLLYWOOD WHICH YOU CALL THE WEST
07:20:18 NEIGHBOR.
07:20:19 NOW WE'RE SAYING THAT THAT LOT SHOULD ALSO BE ALLOWED TO
07:20:29 REZONED FROM RESIDENTIAL SEMINOLE HEIGHTS TO COMMERCIAL
07:20:32 INTENSIVE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS.
07:20:37 >> THAT IS CORRECT.
07:20:37 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO
07:20:41 REZONE THE DUAL ZONING LOT.
07:20:42 DANNY STATED, AND I'LL REITERATE THIS IS A (INAUDIBLE)
07:20:46 REZONING SO AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING THE APPLICANT WILL BE
07:20:49 REQUIRED TO MEET ALL BUFFERING AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
07:20:53 PER CODE.
07:20:53 AS YOU SEE IT NOW AS A VACANT LOT, THERE WOULD BE
07:20:56 DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD HAVE TO ADHERE TO CODE AND THE
07:20:58 SEMINOLE HEIGHTS DESIGN DISTRICT CODE.
07:21:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT ARE SOME OF THE INTENSIVE USES OF A
07:21:07 CI, SINCE WE'RE STUCK WITH (INAUDIBLE), IT PROBABLY WOULD
07:21:13 HAVE BEEN NICE TO DO A P.D. BUT WE CAN'T FORCE PEOPLE TO DO
07:21:16 A P.D.
07:21:17 WHAT ARE SOME OF THE POSSIBLE WORST USES, HEAVIEST USES IN
07:21:23 THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CATEGORY.
07:21:28 >> SO AGAIN, I'D LIKE TO DEFER THIS JUST SO YOU CAN SEE THE
07:21:32 USES FOLLOWING THE STAFF REPORT.
07:21:36 IT WOULD BE HARD TO SAY WHICH THE MOST INTENSE WOULD BE.
07:21:40 I'D ASSUME MAYBE SOMETHING LIKE A RESTAURANT.
07:21:43 THAT WOULD BE MORE --
07:21:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S NOT STRAIGHT COMMERCIAL.
07:21:47 THIS IS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
07:21:49 >> CORRECT.
07:21:50 IT'S COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND IN THE STAFF REPORT AFTER PAGE
07:21:54 SEVEN HIGHLIGHTS THE PERMITTING USES OUTLINED WITH THE X.
07:21:59 ANY S-1 IS SPECIAL USE ONES ADMINISTRATIVELY DONE IF ALL
07:22:03 CODE IS MET AND SPECIAL USE TWO MEANS TO GO IN FRONT OF THE
07:22:07 COUNCIL.
07:22:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.
07:22:10 ONE MORE QUESTION, MR. CHAIR MAN.
07:22:12 I'M LOOKING AT THE STAFF REPORT AND I'M LOOKING AT THE
07:22:16 SCHEDULE OF PERMITTED USES.
07:22:23 AS I GO DOWN, I'M SEEING GASOLINE RETAIL.
07:22:27 SO ARGUABLY THIS USE, THEY'RE COMING IN OFF FLORIDA ALL THE
07:22:32 WAY TO THE THIRD LOT COULD BE A GAS STATION.
07:22:37 >> IT COULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE INCLUDING
07:22:40 REZONING AND IT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW SH-CI REQUIREMENTS,
07:22:44 YES.
07:22:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
07:22:45 IT COULD BE A DRY CLEANER.
07:22:47 IT COULD BE A HOTEL/MOTEL.
07:22:49 IT COULD BE LIGHT MANUFACTURING.
07:22:53 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
07:22:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
07:22:57 IT COULD BE OPEN STORAGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE.
07:23:00 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
07:23:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M TRYING TO MAKE SURE -- VEHICLE REPAIR
07:23:08 MAJOR AND MINOR.
07:23:11 >> AGAIN, ALL THE USES UNDER SH-CI WITH THE X OUTLINED IN
07:23:14 THE STAFF REPORT WOULD BE A PERMITTED USE FOR OUR ZONING
07:23:17 CODE.
07:23:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M JUST TRYING TO STATE WHAT THEY ARE ON
07:23:22 THE RECORD.
07:23:25 BECAUSE MR. SHELBY SAYS WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL TO MAKE A
07:23:28 RECORD.
07:23:28 THANK YOU.
07:23:31 >> YES, SIR.
07:23:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
07:23:33 COUNCILMAN CITRO, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION?
07:23:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:23:36 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
07:23:38 I WAS TRYING TO GET TO THAT POINT EARLIER.
07:23:40 FLORIDA AVENUE IS LONG BEEN TRYING TO GET RID OF
07:23:43 ESTABLISHMENTS SUCH AS CAR SALES AND I KNOW THIS IS ALLOWED
07:23:48 NOW, BUT THE THOUGHT IS IN THE FUTURE WHEN WE START LOOKING
07:23:52 FORWARD AND MAKING THESE AREAS WALKABLE, MAKING THEM FOR
07:23:56 SMALL RETAIL, AND Y GET THE FEELING THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIGHT
07:24:00 NOT, AND I'M NOT GIVING TESTIMONY, THEY MIGHT NOT WANT TO
07:24:04 HAVE VEHICLE REPAIRS AS THEY'RE WALKING DOWN THE STREET.
07:24:08 SO I'M AGAIN ASKING THIS -- IS THIS TODAY'S USE OR THE
07:24:13 FUTURE USE FOR THIS PROPERTY?
07:24:17 >> RYAN MANASSE, PLANNING AND DESIGN AND COORDINATION.
07:24:21 IT COULD BE USE ANY IN THE FUTURE.
07:24:23 CURRENTLY IT'S A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSE ON A SPLIT
07:24:26 ZONE LOT.
07:24:27 GOING FORWARD IF ALL INTENTIONS WERE DEVELOP UNDER SH-CI,
07:24:31 AND THEY'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PERMITTING PROCESS AND
07:24:34 MEET THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS GUIDELINES AND AS COUNCILMAN
07:24:36 DINGFELDER POINTED OUT THROUGH THE STAFF REPORT AND ALL THE
07:24:39 PERMITTED USES, THOSE ARE USES THEY'D BE ABLE TO GO TO.
07:24:43 DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION?
07:24:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IN A LONG DRAWN, YES.
07:24:48 YES IT DOES.
07:24:49 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
07:24:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:24:52 ARE THERE ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT HAVE QUESTIONS AT
07:24:57 THIS TIME?
07:24:58 ALL RIGHT.
07:24:59 MR. SHELBY, BEFORE WE GO TO THE APPLICANT.
07:25:02 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES.
07:25:02 FOR THE APPLICANT, HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN FOR THE HEARING?
07:25:10 >> YES.
07:25:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
07:25:12 AND ALSO, THE CITY AGREES AND ASKS THAT EACH APPLICANT
07:25:15 CONFIRM YOUR AGREEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT THE 180 DAY
07:25:18 TIMELINE FOR THE COMPLETION OF QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS SUCH
07:25:23 AS THIS IN 27-41E OF THE CITY CODE AND FLORIDA STATUTES IS
07:25:29 EXTENDED.
07:25:30 DO YOU AGREE TO WAIVE THAT 180 DAY TIMEFRAME?
07:25:34 >> YES.
07:25:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:25:37 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
07:25:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
07:25:39 APPLICANT, IF YOU'D STATE YOUR NAME AND OF COURSE BE SWORN
07:25:44 IN.
07:25:44 OR YOU WERE SWORN IN.
07:25:46 SO SAY YOUR NAME AND YOU MAY PROCEED WITH YOUR PRESENTATION.
07:25:50 >> RUTH LONDONO.
07:25:53 1602 (INAUDIBLE) SUITE D, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
07:25:57 I'M REPRESENTING THE OWNERS OF (INAUDIBLE) CONSTRUCTION TO
07:26:07 REZONE THIS PROPERTY.
07:26:08 CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN?
07:26:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE SHARE THE SCREEN.
07:26:19 >> OKAY.
07:26:23 WE HAVE ONE PHONE NUMBER, AND WE HAVE RIGHT NOW TWO PARKING
07:26:30 LOT, AND RESIDENTIAL LOT.
07:26:34 WE HAVE RIGHT NOW THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE
07:26:38 IN ONE LOT, AND ON THE OTHER ONE, A VACANT LOT WITH A SINGLE
07:26:44 SEMINOLE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
07:26:46 WE HAVE A QUESTION TO (INAUDIBLE) TO HAVE BOTH SIDES OF THE
07:26:52 LOT TO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
07:26:58 WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH SOME OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE
07:27:03 PROPERTY.
07:27:09 LIKE WE HAVE -- IN THIS PART WE HAVE BEEN TALKING WITH ALL
07:27:13 THE PEOPLE AROUND, AND THEY ARE AGREED THAT THEY ARE
07:27:17 SUPPORTING THE REZONING.
07:27:20 WE HAVE SOME AFFIDAVITS THAT THEY SAY THAT WE HAVE -- THEY
07:27:27 HAVE ANY PROBLEM.
07:27:30 WE HAVE THE PROPERTY FROM THIS 107.
07:27:38 THAT'S ALL THE AFFIDAVITS FROM THE OWNERS THAT ARE
07:27:42 SUPPORTING THE AFFIDAVIT REZONING.
07:27:48 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION, I CAN RESPOND THE QUESTION.
07:27:53 THIS IS GOING TO BE -- WE UNDERSTAND THAT AT THE TIME THEY
07:27:58 REQUEST THE PERMIT WE NEED TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
07:28:03 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND CODE FOR SEMINOLE HEIGHTS.
07:28:07 WE AGREE THAT WE GO TO THE SITE PLAN WHEN THEY HAVE THE USES
07:28:12 FOR COMMERCIAL THAT WE GO TO USE THE (INAUDIBLE) FOR PARKING
07:28:20 FOR THE NEXT STORE.
07:28:22 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I CAN ANSWER TO YOU.
07:28:28 DO ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
07:28:34 DO ANY MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
07:28:40 HEARING NONE, DID DO WE HAVE ANYONE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
07:28:43 WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 4?
07:28:47 IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK FOR ITEM NUMBER 4?
07:28:58 >> THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF ITEM NUMBER 4.
07:29:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:29:03 ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS BEFORE WE
07:29:09 GO TO CLOSE?
07:29:12 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, THE APPLICANT ELUDED TO INDIVIDUALS WHO
07:29:18 WERE IN FAVOR OF IT.
07:29:19 DOES SHE HAVE ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT?
07:29:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: APPLICANT, DO YOU HAVE ANY DOCUMENTATION
07:29:25 OR ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE RECEIVED AND FILE ANY
07:29:29 PETITIONS, ANYTHING SHOWING ANY SUPPORT FOR THIS PROJECT?
07:29:32 >> YES.
07:29:33 I SEND THE AFFIDAVITS AND I SUBMIT THE AFFIDAVITS TO THE
07:29:37 NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:29:37 WE CAN SUBMIT THAT ONE.
07:29:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:29:41 >> AFFIDAVIT THAT I PRESENT IN THE PRESENTATION.
07:29:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:29:48 MR. SHELBY, WILL WE NEED TO RECEIVE AND FILE WHATEVER
07:29:51 DOCUMENTS THOSE ARE?
07:29:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, IT DEPENDS WHAT WEIGHT YOU WISH TO
07:29:57 GIVE IT.
07:29:58 IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IT PERSONALLY AND SHE SHOWED IT ON THE
07:30:01 SCREEN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT SAYS.
07:30:03 I COULD NOT SEE IT.
07:30:03 I DON'T KNOW WHAT COUNCIL WISHES TO HAVE PRESENTED WITH
07:30:08 REGARD TO THAT EVIDENCE.
07:30:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OPINION FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:30:15 WE'RE GOING BACK TO HER SCREEN HERE TO SEE.
07:30:22 IF YOU CAN SEE THOSE, THOSE ARE LETTERS OF SUPPORT.
07:30:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE, COUNCIL, THERE MIGHT BE OTHER
07:30:40 LETTERS.
07:30:40 NOT JUST WITH THIS HEARING BUT ALL HEARINGS THAT THOSE
07:30:43 LETTERS THAT DO COME IN DO COME IN TO YOUR MAIL BOXES, MY
07:30:47 UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT DOES.
07:30:49 THEY'RE ALSO UPLOADED TO SIRE SO YOU CAN SEE LETTERS OR
07:30:53 DOCUMENTS UPLOADED BY CITY STAFF WHEN THEY COME INTO THE
07:30:57 QUASI BOX.
07:30:59 THOSE ARE UPLOADED FOR YOUR REVIEW ON SIRE.
07:31:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
07:31:02 ALL RIGHT.
07:31:03 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:31:06 ANYTHING ELSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:31:11 >> YES, SIR.
07:31:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHO SAID THAT?
07:31:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DINGFELDER.
07:31:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
07:31:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
07:31:18 I'M HAVING TROUBLE PULLING IT UP ON MY COMPUTER, BUT I DO
07:31:26 RECALL SEEING SOME E-MAILS IN -- FROM THE NEIGHBORS IN
07:31:31 OPPOSITION TO THIS.
07:31:35 I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY CAN HELP ME OUT.
07:31:37 ANYBODY BETTER ORGANIZED ON THEIR COMPUTER, PERHAPS, ANYBODY
07:31:42 HAVE THE FILE?
07:31:47 >> WE DO HAVE.
07:31:50 YES.
07:31:50 WE DO HAVE.
07:31:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHO IS SPEAKING?
07:31:55 I'M SORRY.
07:31:56 >> MICHELLE FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE.
07:31:57 WE HAVE TWO LETTERS IN DENIAL.
07:32:00 FOR DENIAL.
07:32:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN YOU SHARE THAT WITH EVERYBODY IF
07:32:04 THAT'S OKAY, MR. CHAIRMAN?
07:32:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
07:32:08 >> JUST ONE MOMENT.
07:32:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU CAN PUT THEM UP OR READ THEM TO US.
07:33:00 IF THERE IS ONLY TWO, IT MIGHT BE EASIER IF YOU JUST WANT TO
07:33:03 READ THEM TO US.
07:33:03 IT'S UP TO YOU.
07:33:16 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, THEY'RE LOOKING FOR IT AS WE SPEAK.
07:33:19 THEY'LL BE WITH YOU MOMENTARILY.
07:33:29 >> MARTY, I AM LOOKING BACK AT MY PAST E-MAILS OF PEOPLE
07:33:34 THAT SENT IN CITIZENS THAT SENT IN CONCERNING 104 WEST
07:33:40 HOLLYWOOD THAT WERE DATED AS FAR BACK AS JUNE 17.
07:33:44 SHOULD THOSE BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION?
07:33:47 >> ABSOLUTELY.
07:33:48 >> OKAY.
07:33:49 I'M SEEING A VERY LONG LIST.
07:33:50 SO ARE THOSE GOING TO BE NEEDED TO BE RECEIVED AND FILED,
07:33:57 MARTY?
07:33:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THOSE ULTIMATELY ARE PART OF THE RECORD,
07:34:00 AND THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE COUNCIL HAD AN OPPORTUNITY
07:34:04 TO REVIEW THE RECORD TO MAKE DECISION BASED ON THE COMPETENT
07:34:08 AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
07:34:10 IT'S ULTIMATELY EACH COUNCIL MEMBER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BE
07:34:15 ABLE TO BE ABLE TO SUFFICIENTLY COMPETENT THAT PEOPLE VIEW
07:34:20 THE RECORD TO BE ABLE TO BASE THE DECISION.
07:34:22 SO THE QUESTION IS -- AND OF COURSE NOW WE'RE IN UNCHARTERED
07:34:27 WATERS WITH REGARD TO THE VIRTUAL MEETING, SO.
07:34:30 >> AND AGAIN, I'M SORRY, COUNCIL.
07:34:34 I DO NOT WANT TO BE A PERSON THAT IS GIVING EVIDENCE,
07:34:37 HOWEVER, I'M LOOKING AT PROBABLY 15 THAT GO BACK TO JUNE
07:34:43 17th, AND THESE LETTERS -- I'M GOING TO SAY THE MAJORITY OF
07:34:47 THEM NOT HAVING READ ALL OF THEM RIGHT NOW ARE NOT IN FAVOR
07:34:51 OF THIS BEING RE-DONE.
07:34:54 THIS PROPERTY BE REZONED.
07:34:57 >> MY UNDERSTANDING WOULD BE THE CLARK WOULD OR SHOULD HAVE
07:34:59 THAT IN THE CLERK'S FILE.
07:35:04 MAY I MAKE AN INQUIRY OF THE CLERK?
07:35:07 DO YOU HAVE MORE THAN TWO LETTERS FOR THAT PARTICULAR FILE?
07:35:09 >> NO.
07:35:10 FOR THIS --
07:35:11 >> IN THE PAST.
07:35:13 >> FOR A PAST ONE OR THIS CURRENT ONE?
07:35:15 >> IT'S THE SAME FILE.
07:35:17 SAME FILE NUMBER AND SAME CASE.
07:35:21 THIS HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED SO IT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT
07:35:23 SOMEBODY WHEN THEY RECEIVED A NOTICE INITIALLY MAY HAVE
07:35:25 RESPONDED AND THAT HEARING WOULD HAVE BEEN CANCELED FOR THE
07:35:31 REASONS OF THE PANDEMIC.
07:35:33 >> MARTY, WHAT WAS THE INITIAL HEARING DATE?
07:35:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY: INITIAL HEARING DATE FOR NUMBER 4 WAS
07:35:42 ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 14 AND THEN JUNE 18.
07:35:47 >> YES.
07:35:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: 14th WAS THE ORIGINAL HEARING DATE.
07:35:51 >> YES.
07:35:51 WE HAVE ALL THE CORRESPONDENCE FROM JUNE 18TH.
07:35:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DOES THAT INCLUDE THINGS FOR THE MAY 14
07:36:00 ORIGINAL NOTICE?
07:36:02 >> FOR THIS ONE, IT WAS EVERYTHING FOR JUNE 18.
07:36:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THERE ANYTHING THAT ENDED UP IN THE MAY
07:36:16 14 FILE?
07:36:24 >> MR. SHELBY AND MS. WELLS?
07:36:28 WE ARE -- I THINK WE ENTERED A LITTLE DICY TERRITORY AND
07:36:34 MR. CITRO, I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU REMEMBERING THAT, AND
07:36:38 ADVISING COUNCIL.
07:36:40 I HAVE BEEN -- I'M LOOKING IN MY FILE, AND I CAN'T FIND IT.
07:36:44 IT DID RING A BELL THAT I HAD SEEN SOME OF THOSE.
07:36:49 MR. CITRO, IF THE CLERK DOESN'T HAVE THEM, I THINK WE'RE ALL
07:36:53 AT A DISADVANTAGE NOT HAVING ALL THE EVIDENCE WE NEED.
07:36:57 I WOULD SUGGEST THAT PROCEDURALLY, YOU KNOW, WE PROBABLY
07:37:03 NEED TO CONTINUE THIS TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE HEARING AND LET
07:37:07 THEM BE FIRST UP ON THE AGENDA.
07:37:09 WE APOLOGIZE TO THE APPLICANT, BUT I THINK ALL COUNCIL
07:37:12 MEMBERS NEED TO HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE INFORMATION THAT'S
07:37:15 COME IN FROM THE PUBLIC.
07:37:20 MS. WELLS OR MR. SHELBY.
07:37:24 >>CATE WELLS: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, THIS IS CATE WELLS,
07:37:27 CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.
07:37:28 ALL THE E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE
07:37:31 CITY IN ADVANCE OF TODAY'S HEARING AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE
07:37:35 PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED HEARINGS SHOULD BE PART OF THE RECORD
07:37:38 OF TONIGHT'S HEARING AND SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO EVERY
07:37:43 COUNCIL MEMBER.
07:37:44 SO I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT DIDN'T OCCUR IN THIS INSTANCE, BUT
07:37:48 YOU ARE CORRECT.
07:37:50 YOU SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE RECORD.
07:37:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:37:53 WOULD THEN THERE BE A MOTION TO --
07:37:56 >> IF I MAY FOLLOW-UP ON THAT, BECAUSE YES.
07:37:59 THIS BEING A NEW SITUATION, THIS MIGHT BE A FUNCTION OF HOW
07:38:04 THAT INFORMATION IS CHANNELED, COLLECTED, FUNNELED, AND
07:38:09 DISTRIBUTED.
07:38:10 THAT MIGHT NEED TO WARRANT FURTHER SCRUTINY TO BE ABLE TO
07:38:14 ENSURE THAT WHEN THESE MEETINGS COME BEFORE COUNCIL YOU HAD
07:38:20 THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW EVIDENCE THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATED
07:38:22 PRIOR TO THE HEARINGS TO ACTUALLY BE BASED ON THE EVIDENT SO
07:38:28 THANK YOU, SIR.
07:38:31 -- EVIDENCE.
07:38:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD THERE BE A MOTION TO CONTINUE
07:38:36 THIS?
07:38:37 >> WE ASK OF THE PETITIONER DOES SHE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE
07:38:40 SITUATION IS RELATIVE TO WHAT THE SITUATION IS WITH COUNCIL?
07:38:45 >> YES.
07:38:45 I UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO THE CONTINUANCE.
07:38:58 I WANT TO SAY SOMETHING IF THAT'S OKAY.
07:39:00 I AGREE THE OWNERS AGREE THAT WE CAN CONTINUE THE
07:39:04 APPLICATION, BUT ALSO I WANT TO SAY THAT THE (INAUDIBLE) WAS
07:39:09 SPEAKING WITH ONE OF THE PEOPLE AND WASN'T THE SAME
07:39:14 (INAUDIBLE).
07:39:23 NOW THEY HAVE CHANGED SOME OF THE -- WHAT THEY THINK BECAUSE
07:39:28 MAYBE THEY KNOW NOW, BUT THIS RESPOND DOES NO GOOD TO BE AN
07:39:34 ISSUE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:39:41 THAT'S SOMETHING TO INCLUDE THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:39:43 I AGREE IF WE HAVE CONTINUANCE, WE HAVE CONTINUANCE.
07:39:48 >> THANK YOU.
07:39:49 MS. WELLS, I DON'T HAVE -- I GUESS I DO BUT WHAT CONTINUANCE
07:39:53 DAY WOULD YOU RECOMMEND BASED ON WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND OF THE
07:39:56 SCHEDULE?
07:39:57 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU.
07:39:57 I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THE CALENDAR OF HEARINGS SCHEDULED BY
07:40:01 CITY COUNCIL.
07:40:01 WE ACTUALLY HAVE A MEETING THE EVENING OF AUGUST 17th AT
07:40:07 THIS TIME.
07:40:08 I'M SHOWING WE HAVE FOUR QUASI JUDICIAL APPLICATIONS
07:40:15 SCHEDULED THAT EVENING AND 11 PLAN AMENDMENTS.
07:40:17 BUT THE PLAN AMENDMENTS, HALF ARE PARKS.
07:40:20 I SEE JIM CREW IS RAISING HIS HAND.
07:40:26 >> YES, SIR.
07:40:27 ALL THE CORRESPONDENCE PERTAINING TO THE HEARING JUNE 18 IS
07:40:32 IN THE BACKUP IN SIRE.
07:40:34 IT WAS PROVIDED.
07:40:34 ALL THE OPPOSITION LETTERS AND E-MAILS ARE IN THERE.
07:40:37 I WANTED TO NOTE THAT FOR THE RECORD.
07:40:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:40:42 >> THAT MIGHT MEAN WE HAVE TO ADDRESS THE PROCESS OF
07:40:46 ENSURING THAT COUNCIL GETS THE EVIDENT IN A TIMELY FASHION
07:40:49 AND HAS ACCESS TO IT AND KNOWS HOW TO RETRIEVE IT FOR EACH
07:40:54 INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBER'S USE BY OFFICE SO THAT MIGHT BE
07:40:59 SOMETHING WE NEED TO ADDRESS.
07:41:01 >> IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PAST AND FINAL AGENDAS PROVIDED.
07:41:04 THE BACKUP MATERIAL.
07:41:07 FROM THE JUNE 18 HEARING INCLUDED IN THAT BACKUP MATERIAL.
07:41:12 WANTED TO NOTE THAT FOR THE RECORD, IT WAS PROVIDED.
07:41:17 >> COUNCIL MEMBER DINGFELDER, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT'S A
07:41:20 RELATIVELY NEW, BRAND NEW PROCESS THAT HAS BEEN INSTITUTED
07:41:25 TO REPLACE THE PHYSICAL QUASI BOX THAT SAT IN THE COUNTER OF
07:41:31 CITY COUNCIL'S OFFICE PHYSICALLY THAT REQUIRED SOMEBODY TO
07:41:33 HAVE TO GO IN AND MANUALLY DO.
07:41:35 SO WORKING WITH TNI AND THE CLERK'S, A PROCESS
07:41:41 HAS -- OFFICE, A PROCESS HAS BEEN INSTITUTED AND FRANKLY NOW
07:41:44 THAT WE'RE RECOGNIZING ISSUES COMING UP, WE'LL HAVE TO WORK
07:41:51 THROUGH THE PROCESSES.
07:41:55 >> IN LIGHT OF ALL THIS, I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO THE DATE THAT
07:41:58 MS. WELLS HAS SUGGESTED.
07:42:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AUGUST 17.
07:42:02 >> AUGUST 17.
07:42:04 I THINK WE CAN GIVE THEM THE COURTESY OF BEING FIRST UP.
07:42:10 >> FOR THE REZONINGS AFTER THE PLAN AMENDMENTS?
07:42:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT WOULD BE FINE.
07:42:16 >> 5:01 P.M. ON MONDAY NIGHT.
07:42:19 IT'S A MONDAY NIGHT.
07:42:22 AS OPPOSED TO A THURSDAY NIGHT.
07:42:23 PLEASE REMEMBER IT WILL BE A MONDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 17, AT
07:42:27 5:01 P.M.
07:42:30 >> SECOND.
07:42:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM
07:42:33 TO AUGUST 17 WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:42:38 A ROLL CALL VOTE THEN.
07:42:42 >> VIERA.
07:42:44 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:42:45 >> GUDES?
07:42:51 GUDES?
07:42:55 GUDES?
07:42:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GUDES, YOU'RE MUTED.
07:43:00 COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:43:02 >> DINGFELDER?
07:43:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:43:05 GUDES WAS SAYING YES.
07:43:07 BUT HE IS HAVING TROUBLE WITH HIS MICROPHONE.
07:43:12 >> IS SOMEBODY MUTED?
07:43:13 I HEAR BACKGROUND TALK.
07:43:15 OKAY.
07:43:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:43:22 >> CARLSON?
07:43:24 CITRO?
07:43:27 >> YES.
07:43:27 COUNCILMAN GUDES, ARE YOU MISSING YOUR HEAD PHONES?
07:43:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
07:43:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:43:39 >> MOTION CARRIES.
07:43:39 CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
07:43:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:43:43 THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM NUMBER 5.
07:43:52 >> COUNCIL, PLANNING AND DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
07:43:54 COORDINATION.
07:43:54 ITEM 5 IS THE FILE REZ20-26 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8713
07:44:02 NORTH GREENWOOD AVENUE.
07:44:04 THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE PROPERTY IS RESIDENTIAL
07:44:07 SINGLE-FAMILY 60RS-60 AND THEY'RE REQUESTING A REZONING TO
07:44:10 RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50.
07:44:13 I'LL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE REPORT.
07:44:25 >> I'M READING THE PAPERS.
07:44:27 >> CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?
07:44:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, MR. COLLINS.
07:44:33 GO AHEAD ONCE THE SCREEN APPEARS.
07:44:36 WE STILL HAVE THE APPLICANT FROM THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION ON
07:44:39 VIDEO STILL.
07:44:45 >> THAT NEEDS TO BE DANNY COLLINS.
07:44:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, MR. COLLINS.
07:44:56 WE'RE BRINGING IT UP.
07:44:58 >> THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
07:45:00 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
07:45:02 THE NEXT CASE IS THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE
07:45:04 SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE TEMPLE CREST NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:45:12 I POSTED THIS RECREATION FACILITY THAT'S TEMPLE CREST PARK
07:45:16 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2500 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE
07:45:19 SUBJECT SITE.
07:45:20 SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITH THE PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT ALONG
07:45:24 NORTH 40th STREET.
07:45:26 THAT IS NOT WITHIN THE EVACUATION ZONE.
07:45:31 THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
07:45:34 YOU'LL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE
07:45:38 COLOR ON NORTH GREENWOOD AVENUE.
07:45:40 THIS IS A COUPLE BLOCKS TO THE WEST IS NORTH 40th STREET.
07:45:45 PARALLEL TO GREENWOOD.
07:45:46 THEN JUST A FEW BLOCKS TO THE NORTH IS EAST BUSH BOULEVARD
07:45:50 AND YOU'LL SEE PREDOMINANTLY SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL AND
07:45:55 COMMERCIAL WHEN YOU MOVE TOWARDS EAST BUSH BOULEVARD.
07:46:00 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:46:02 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE CATEGORY
07:46:08 WHICH ALLOWS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
07:46:13 IT'S SURROUNDED BY THAT RESIDENTIAL 20 AT THE NORTH, EAST
07:46:18 AND SOUTH.
07:46:19 THE AREA TO THE WEST IS UNDER THE CMU-35 WHICH ALLOWS MIXED
07:46:23 USE DEVELOPMENT UP TO 35.
07:46:32 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST.
07:46:34 IT FOUND THAT THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR FEDERAL IN-FILL
07:46:39 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AN AREA WITH 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
07:46:45 THE PROPOSED ZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT SIMILAR IN
07:46:48 HEIGHT AND SCALE AND -- EXCUSE ME.
07:46:51 LOT PATTERN OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
07:46:56 THEREFORE, ZONING WOULD NOT ALTER THIS CHARACTER OF THE
07:47:02 TEMPLE CREST NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:47:05 STAFF AND I FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE (INAUDIBLE).
07:47:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
07:47:20 IF YOU ARE NOT SPEAKING, PLEASE MUTE.
07:47:24 MUTE YOUR COMPUTERS.
07:47:25 THERE IS A LOT OF BACKGROUND NOISE AND IT'S CONFUSING.
07:47:30 VERY GOOD.
07:47:30 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
07:47:31 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:47:33 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
07:47:37 ALL RIGHT.
07:47:38 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:47:39 NEXT UP?
07:47:40 >> RYAN MANASSE, PLANNING AND DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
07:47:44 COORDINATION.
07:47:44 MR. CREW, CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?
07:47:56 ARE WE UP?
07:47:57 OKAY.
07:47:58 SO ITEM NUMBER 5, AGAIN, REZ20-26.
07:48:02 THEY'RE REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM RS-60 TO RS-50 THROUGH THE
07:48:06 REZONING REQUEST, THERE ARE NO WAIVERS ALLOWED THROUGH THIS
07:48:08 APPLICATION PROCESS.
07:48:09 AGAIN, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8713 NORTH GREENWOOD
07:48:12 AVENUE.
07:48:14 THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY INCLUDES TWO PLATTED LOTS.
07:48:16 LOTS FIVE AND SIX OF BLOCK NINE OF TEMPLE CREST UNIT ONE.
07:48:20 LOT FIVE MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET IN WIDTH.
07:48:26 50 FEET IN WIDTH AND 128.3 FEET IN LENGTH CONTAINING A TOTAL
07:48:31 LOT AREA OF 6,415 SQUARE FEET.
07:48:34 LOT SIX MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET IN WIDTH WITH 126.8
07:48:41 IN DEPTH AND 6,344 SQUARE FEET.
07:48:45 THE COMBINED SITE AREA FOR BOTH LOTS IS APPROXIMATELY 12,759
07:48:50 SQUARE FEET.
07:48:51 THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS A DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
07:48:56 RESIDENCE ON THE PROPERTY AND IT'S THREE LOTS SOUTH OF THE
07:48:59 NORTH GREENWOOD AREA AND EAST HUMPHREY STREETS INTERACTIONS.
07:49:03 IT'S A DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH AND
07:49:06 SOUTH IN THE RS-60 ZONING DISTRICTS AND VACANT COMMERCIAL
07:49:10 PROPERTY AND COMMERCIAL USES TO THE WEST IN THE CG SCREENING
07:49:16 DISTRICT.
07:49:16 THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL REGULATIONS AT THE TIME
07:49:19 OF PERMITTING THROUGH THE REZONING REQUEST.
07:49:23 IN YOUR STAFF REPORT ON PAGE 2, IT WILL GIVE YOU THE
07:49:26 REQUIREMENTS FOR RS-50 AS FAR AS SETBACKS AND REFERENCE TO
07:49:33 27-156A WHICH IS THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
07:49:37 STAFF DID DO ANALYSIS OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
07:49:42 THE TEMPLE CREST FIRST UNIT SUBDIVISION WAS ORIGINALLY
07:49:45 PLATTED IN 1924 WITH LOTS RANGING FROM 35 FEET TO 137 FEET
07:49:49 IN WIDTH WITH DEPTHS RANGING FROM 99.98 TO 137 FEET.
07:49:54 THE TEMPLE CREST SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 22 BLOCKS AND THE
07:49:58 SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BLOCK NINE OF THE SUBDIVISION, LOTS FIVE
07:50:02 AND SIX.
07:50:03 THE SUBJECT APPLICATION SEEKS TO REESTABLISH THOSE
07:50:06 ORIGINALLY PLATTED LOTS TO CREATE TWO BUILDABLE LOTS.
07:50:11 THE OVERALL ANALYSIS INCLUDES PORTIONS OF THE TEMPLE CREST
07:50:15 SUBDIVISION AND 106 TOTAL ZONING LOTS OR DEVELOPED PARCELS.
07:50:21 51 OR 48% OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH -- I'M SORRY.
07:50:24 HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH THE WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND
07:50:29 55 FEET -- OR I'M SORRY.
07:50:30 55 OR 52% OF THE DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR
07:50:36 LESS.
07:50:37 PURSUANT TO THE REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN,
07:50:41 THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 16 TOTAL ZONING LOTS.
07:50:45 7 OR 44% OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOP WOULD A WIDTH OF 60
07:50:48 FEET OR GREATER.
07:50:49 AND NINE OR 56% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH WITH A WIDTH OF
07:50:57 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
07:50:58 MOVING FORWARD WITH THE 8700 BLOCK OF GREENWOOD AVENUE WHICH
07:51:02 IS BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET, 12 TOTAL ZONING LOTS.
07:51:05 SIX OR 56% OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF
07:51:10 60 FEET OR GREATER AND SIX WITH 50% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH
07:51:14 A WIDTH OF 59.99 OR LESS.
07:51:18 THE BLOCK HAD EIGHT ZONING LOTS WITH THREE OR 37.5 OF THE
07:51:22 LOTS BEING DEVELOPED WITH A 60 FEET OR GREATER AND FIVE OR
07:51:27 62.5% BEING DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
07:51:33 THROUGH THIS ANALYSIS STAFF DID FIND THE PROPOSED REQUEST
07:51:37 CONSISTENT WITH THE 20 PATTERN OF THE AREA.
07:51:40 THERE ARE NO HISTORIC LANDMARKS WITHIN THE 1,000 FEET OF THE
07:51:44 SUBJECT SITE.
07:51:45 ON YOUR SCREEN, THERE IS THE AERIAL SHOWING THE SUBJECT SITE
07:51:49 OUTLINED IN RED AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S THE ZONING FOR THE
07:51:54 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
07:51:56 THE LOCATION TO THE NORTH 40th STREET AND SOUTH OF EAST BUSH
07:52:00 BOULEVARD.
07:52:03 AND LET ME SHOW YOU SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE.
07:52:15 THE WEST NEIGHBORS, 8720 NORTH GREENWOOD AVENUE,
07:52:20 MULTI-FAMILY.
07:52:21 THE WEST NEIGHBOR IS 8716 NORTH GREENWOOD.
07:52:24 AND AGAIN, THE ADDITIONAL WEST NEIGHBOR, THAT'S THIS
07:52:28 PROPERTY 8710 NORTH GREENWOOD.
07:52:30 THEN THE SOUTH NEIGHBOR AT 8711 NORTH GREENWOOD AVENUE.
07:52:37 AGAIN, THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY RS-60 AND WAS UNDER CHAPTER
07:52:42 43.
07:52:42 THE CURRENT LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 20.
07:52:46 THERE IS NO VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY AND SPECIAL USE
07:52:49 APPLICATION OR REZONING APPLICATIONS I FOUND AND NO CODE
07:52:54 ENFORCEMENT VIOLATIONS AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT.
07:52:57 WITH THAT BEING SAID, THE DEVELOPMENT ASK STAFF REVIEWED THE
07:53:01 APPLICATION AND FIND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
07:53:04 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
07:53:05 PLEASE REFER -- REFERENCE THE PLANNING AND DESIGN AND
07:53:08 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION RELATED TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
07:53:11 PATTERN IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
07:53:12 STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
07:53:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ANY
07:53:19 QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
07:53:21 DO ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
07:53:24 ANYBODY?
07:53:28 HEARING NONE, MR. SHELBY, BEFORE WE GO TO THE APPLICANT.
07:53:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES.
07:53:33 IS THE APPLICANT HERE?
07:53:40 IS THE APPLICANT ON THE LINE?
07:53:46 >> YES.
07:53:46 >> THE APPLICANT IS ON THE LINE.
07:53:47 HE JUST NEEDS TO CLICK ON HIS VIDEO AND MICROPHONE.
07:54:03 >> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
07:54:05 >> MR. GRISSACK.
07:54:06 IS THAT CORRECT?
07:54:07 >> YES.
07:54:08 HI.
07:54:10 >> SIR, HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN?
07:54:12 >> NO.
07:54:16 >> OKAY.
07:54:16 IF YOU CAN, IF YOU'D PLEASE BE SWORN.
07:54:19 >> OKAY.
07:54:19 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
07:54:20 DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH
07:54:23 AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
07:54:25 >> I DO.
07:54:25 >> THANK YOU.
07:54:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: ONE OTHER ITEM.
07:54:27 THE CITY AGREES AND ASKS EACH APPLICANT TO CONFIRM YOUR
07:54:31 AGREEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT THE 180 DAY TIMELINE FOR THE
07:54:35 COMPLETION OF QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS IN SECTION 166.033
07:54:41 FLORIDA STATUTES IS EXTENDED.
07:54:43 DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR WAIVER OF THE 180 DAYS?
07:54:46 >> YES.
07:54:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:54:49 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
07:54:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:54:55 APPLICANT, GO AHEAD.
07:54:57 >> YES.
07:54:57 I WANTED TO ADD THAT WE GOT A LETTER OR E-MAIL DATED JUNE 11
07:55:01 FROM JIM MCKAY, THE TAMPA CREST CIVIC ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT.
07:55:08 THE TAMPA CREST CIVIC ASSOCIATION HAS RECEIVED A GOOD
07:55:12 NEIGHBOR NOTICE AND THEY'RE PLEASED TO GIVE THEIR
07:55:17 ENDORSEMENT TO THE PROJECT.
07:55:18 IT WOULD BE A GREAT IMPROVEMENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND
07:55:21 WHEN IT'S FINISHED, WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE COMPLETION.
07:55:24 I WANT TO ADD, I THINK RYAN ADDED THAT SOME LOTS ARE 59.
07:55:28 I BELIEVE EVEN THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR IS RS-50 AND THERE IS
07:55:32 SEVERAL ON THE BLOCK THAT ARE RS-50.
07:55:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:55:44 GO AHEAD IF YOU'D LIKE TO BEGIN.
07:55:53 APPLICANT, WOULD YOU LIKE TO CONTINUE?
07:55:56 >> I'M SORRY.
07:55:56 I'M FINISHED.
07:55:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT WAS IT?
07:55:58 OKAY.
07:55:59 ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
07:56:02 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
07:56:05 IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS
07:56:07 ITEM?
07:56:08 ITEM NUMBER 5.
07:56:15 >> VOTE TO CLOSE, MR. CHAIRMAN.
07:56:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT.
07:56:17 LET'S GIVE A SECOND TO THE CONVENTION CENTER.
07:56:21 >> OKAY.
07:56:21 I DIDN'T KNOW.
07:56:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:56:31 HEARING NONE IF THERE IS NO OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
07:56:34 MEMBERS.
07:56:35 IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, I'D LIKE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
07:56:37 HEARING.
07:56:38 ANY OBJECTION TO THAT?
07:56:39 SEEING NO OBJECTION, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.
07:56:44 I BELIEVE WE HAVE COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA IF YOU'D LIKE TO READ
07:56:48 THE SUBSTITUTE FOR ITEM NUMBER 5.
07:56:51 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, MR. CHAIR.
07:56:52 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:56:53 I MOVE TO SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE B PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
07:56:58 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
07:57:02 VICINITY OF 8731 IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND
07:57:09 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60
07:57:13 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
07:57:18 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:57:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THE MOTION?
07:57:22 SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES.
07:57:25 ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:57:29 >> VIERA?
07:57:31 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:57:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
07:57:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
07:57:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:57:38 >> CARLSON?
07:57:44 CITRO.
07:57:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:57:46 >> MIRANDA?
07:57:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
07:57:49 >> MOTION CARRIES WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
07:57:52 SECOND READING ON SEPTEMBER 10 AT 5:01 P.M.
07:57:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:58:00 NOW ITEM NUMBER 6.
07:58:06 >> THE NEXT ITEM IS -- MARY SAMANIEGO.
07:58:12 ITEM NUMBER 19-85.
07:58:14 I NEED TO BE SWORN.
07:58:15 >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH?
07:58:19 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH
07:58:23 AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
07:58:24 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES.
07:58:25 >> THANK YOU.
07:58:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
07:58:27 GO AHEAD.
07:58:28 MARY SAMANIEGO MARY SAMANIEGO, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
07:58:32 COORDINATION.
07:58:33 THE NEXT ONE IS A REZONING REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 129
07:58:36 AND 130 NORTH MAXWELL PLACE FROM PD TO PD DETACHED SINGLE
07:58:42 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
07:58:43 I DEFER TO DANNY COLLINS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:58:47 >> THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
07:58:49 CAN YOU SHOW MY POWER POINT, PLEASE?
07:59:03 DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
07:59:05 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
07:59:05 THE NEXT CASE IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND
07:59:09 MCFARLAND PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:59:16 THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN PROXIMITY OR -- THE CLOSEST PUBLIC
07:59:21 PARK IS MCFARLAND PARK DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT
07:59:25 SITE.
07:59:25 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT WITH
07:59:28 THE CLOSEST STOP WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON
07:59:33 HOWARD AVENUE.
07:59:34 THE SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE.
07:59:39 THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
07:59:41 THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
07:59:44 THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
07:59:47 YOU'LL SEE NORTH MAXWELL PLACE IS RIGHT TO THE WEST OF THE
07:59:52 SUBJECT SITE.
07:59:53 IT'S JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSTATE 275.
07:59:57 AND JUST TO THE WEST OF NORTH MCFARLAND AVENUE.
08:00:04 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
08:00:06 HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
08:00:07 IT'S OUTLINED IN THE COLOR PURPLE.
08:00:12 IT'S WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY
08:00:14 ALLOWING FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 10 YEARS PER
08:00:17 ACRE.
08:00:18 IT'S SURROUNDED BY THAT RS-10 TO THE NORTHEAST AND ALSO TO
08:00:21 THE SOUTH ON SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE.
08:00:26 IT'S ADJACENT TO MCFARLAND PARK.
08:00:29 I'M SHOWING THIS GREEN COLOR.
08:00:37 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
08:00:40 THE PROPOSED P.D. SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES IN THE PLAN AS IT
08:00:47 RELATES TO REDEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
08:00:49 HOUSING THE CITY'S PRESENT FUTURE POPULATIONS, THE PROPOSED
08:00:55 WOULD PROVIDE NEW HOUSING ON VAC ANT AND UNDER UTILIZED LAND
08:00:59 AND WILL PROVIDE FUTURE RESIDENTS WITH ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE
08:01:02 OPEN SPACE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
08:01:06 POLICIES AND FURTHERMORE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
08:01:11 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 CATEGORY.
08:01:13 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND
08:01:16 THE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA PLAN AND I'M AVAILABLE
08:01:22 FOR QUESTIONS.
08:01:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
08:01:27 ALL RIGHT.
08:01:27 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:01:28 NEXT, PLEASE.
08:01:30 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
08:01:31 MARY SAMANIEGO, CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?
08:01:39 THANK YOU.
08:01:40 AGAIN, THIS IS CASE REZ19-85.
08:01:43 IT'S A REZONING REQUEST FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO PLAN
08:01:46 DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CREATION OF FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
08:01:49 LOTS.
08:01:51 OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT AND STAFF DID FIND THIS APPLICATION
08:01:55 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
08:01:58 THERE ARE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS A
08:02:01 REMINDER FOR YOUR MOTION.
08:02:03 AGAIN, THIS IS AN EXISTENT P.D. THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN
08:02:09 2005 THAT WAS NEVER DEVELOPED SO THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY
08:02:13 VACANT.
08:02:14 AS FAR AS WAIVERS, THE ONLY REQUESTS WAIVERS TO ALLOW THE
08:02:17 REMOVAL OF TWO NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
08:02:20 CITY COUNCIL FOUND IN THE STAFF REPORT THE ANALYSIS OF BOTH
08:02:24 OF THE GRAND TREES PROVIDED BY THE NATURAL RESOURCES
08:02:27 DEPARTMENT.
08:02:27 THEY DID FIND THIS OVERALL APPLICATION CONSISTENT.
08:02:36 HERE IS A SITE PLAN OF WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
08:02:38 AGAIN, THERE ARE FOUR LOTS.
08:02:39 THE PROPERTY IS ON THE CORNER OF MAXWELL STREET AS WELL AS
08:02:43 NORTH GREEN STREETS.
08:02:45 THE LOTS ARE PART OF MCFARLAND PARK.
08:02:49 THE PLATTED LOTS ARE ORIENTED MOSTLY TOWARDS MAXWELL AND
08:02:56 THEN ONE IS PROPOSED TO BE ON GREEN STREET.
08:03:03 BECAUSE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF THE SMALLEST INCLUDING
08:03:07 ZONING DISTRICT IS RS-50, A 50-FOOT WIDE LOT.
08:03:11 HOWEVER, THESE LOTS ARE ASKING FOR REDUCED WIDTHS RANGING
08:03:15 FROM 45 FEET TO 52 FEET, THEREFORE, IT WOULD DEFAULT INTO
08:03:20 REZONING TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT. HERE IS THE SAMPLE OF
08:03:27 BUILDING ELEVATIONS.
08:03:28 HERE IS THE AGAIN AREA THAT DANNY ALSO SHOWED.
08:03:31 HERE IS MCFARLAND PARK.
08:03:34 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ROAD.
08:03:36 AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS -- THESE LOTS AS WELL AS THE BLOCK IS
08:03:42 KIND OF SOMEWHAT OF AN ANOMALY AND IT'S SURROUNDED ON TWO
08:03:46 SIDES BY MCFARLAND PARK AND 275 TO THE SOUTH.
08:03:54 HERE IS THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANALYSIS THAT WE
08:03:57 TYPICALLY COMPLETE.
08:03:59 TOTAL OF 235 TOTAL LOTS WERE ANALYZED.
08:04:05 OF THAT, 84% WERE 50 FEET OR GREATER AND 16% WERE ACTUALLY
08:04:14 LESS THAN 50 FEET IN WIDTH.
08:04:15 TYPICALLY HISTORICALLY PLATTED LOTS OF THE MCFARLAND PARK
08:04:20 SUBDIVISION WHICH HAD LOT WIDTH RANGING DOWN TO 33 FEET IN
08:04:24 WIDTH.
08:04:25 OF THE EXISTING BLOCK, 100% OF THE BLOCK IS 50 FEET OR
08:04:32 GREATER.
08:04:32 HOWEVER, STAFF DID FIND THE CREATION OF THESE FIVE PROPOSED
08:04:37 LOTS AS CONFIGURED WITH LOTS SLIGHTLY LESS THAN 50%
08:04:43 CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE OVERALL
08:04:46 SURROUNDING AREA, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE ISOLATED NATURE OF
08:04:49 THE BLOCK.
08:04:50 AGAIN BOUND BY 275 AND MCFARLAND PARK ON THREE OF THE FOUR
08:04:55 SIDES.
08:04:56 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
08:04:58 AGAIN, AS I STATED, THEY APPROVED A P.D. FOR THE SITE FOR A
08:05:03 DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION OF FIVE LOTS WHICH WAS ULTIMATELY
08:05:06 ADOPTED, HOWEVER, THIS PROPERTY SINCE AT LEAST 2005 IS
08:05:11 REMAINING VACANT.
08:05:14 AND CURRENTLY VACANT SO THE PROPERTY IS VACANT FOR AT LEAST
08:05:18 THE LAST 15 YEARS.
08:05:20 THAT WAS ONE OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES.
08:05:26 SAYING THAT, THERE IS CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
08:05:29 READING.
08:05:30 THERE ARE TWO LOCAL LANDMARKS WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA
08:05:33 THAT ARE FOUND IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
08:05:37 THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY WAIVERS -- I'M SORRY.
08:05:40 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ONE WAIVER TO THE REMOVAL OF TWO
08:05:43 NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
08:05:46 SAYING THAT, ALL STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
08:05:50 OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
08:05:51 DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT THIS TIME?
08:05:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES AND THEN COUNCILMAN
08:05:59 DINGFELDER.
08:06:00 I HEARD HIS VOICE FIRST.
08:06:01 GO AHEAD, SIR.
08:06:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT MIGHT BE SMALL IN THEORY, BUT MARY,
08:06:05 COULD YOU HAVE NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE WHEN
08:06:08 I LOOK AT THE NATURAL RESOURCE REPORT, I GO STRAIGHT TO THE
08:06:13 EVALUATION DATA.
08:06:15 AND TRYING TO FIND OUT WHAT IS THE RATINGS SO IN THE FUTURE,
08:06:18 COULD THEY PUT THE RATINGS IN THE SPOT WHERE IT'S INDICATED
08:06:21 AND ADD ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN THE NOTE SECTION.
08:06:25 THAT COULD BE DONE, PLEASE?
08:06:27 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THAT'S A DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT.
08:06:30 I'LL SPEAK TO THEM IF THEY COULD CHANGE THEIR FORM.
08:06:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT'S NOT ABOUT CHANGING THE FORM, BUT JUST
08:06:39 PUTTING THE INFORMATION IN THE PROPER PLACE SO WHEN YOU GO
08:06:41 TO READ IT YOU'RE NOT LOOKING ALL OVER THE PLACE TO TRY TO
08:06:44 FIND THE INFORMATION.
08:06:44 SO IF WE CAN JUST GET THAT TO THEM, MAYBE LEGAL CAN GET THAT
08:06:48 TO THEM AS WELL SO WHEN I LOOK, I KNOW EXACTLY WHERE I'M
08:06:53 LOOKING.
08:06:54 THANK YOU.
08:06:55 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
08:06:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
08:06:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: COUNCILMAN GUDES, I THINK YOU MADE A GOOD
08:06:59 POINT.
08:07:01 WE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO SEARCH AROUND, BUT MY QUESTION ALSO
08:07:07 RELATES TO THE TREES.
08:07:10 I SEE THAT THEY'RE LAUREL OAKS.
08:07:13 IT LOOKS LIKE THEY REACHED THEIR USEFUL LIFE, AND THEY'RE IN
08:07:16 DECAY C-10 AND THE C-8.
08:07:21 FURTHER DOWN ON THE FORM, MARY, AND I KNOW IT'S NOT YOUR
08:07:24 FORM, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF MR. BORIS IS ON THE LINE.
08:07:28 IT'S UNDER TREE REPLACEMENT.
08:07:31 THERE IS NOTHING FILLED IN ON THAT PORTION.
08:07:37 UNDER TREE REPLACEMENT.
08:07:38 IT SAYS TREE REPLACEMENT INCHES ARE OR ARE NOT REQUIRED.
08:07:43 IT'S A LITTLE, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE VAGUE.
08:07:46 AND THEN IT GOES ON TO SAY THE TOTAL TREE REPLACEMENT INCHES
08:07:49 REQUIRED ARE BLANK.
08:07:51 THEY DON'T FILL IN THE BLANK.
08:07:54 SO IS THAT INCLUDED ON THE P.D. SITE PLAN?
08:07:57 THE AMOUNT OF INCHES FOR REPLACEMENT OR WHAT?
08:07:59 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: YES, SIR.
08:08:00 THAT'S FOUND IN YOUR P.D. SITE PLAN AS PART OF THE GREATER
08:08:03 TREE TABLE.
08:08:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
08:08:07 DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS?
08:08:08 CAN YOU READ YOURS?
08:08:10 I'M HAVING A LITTLE TROUBLE ZOOMING IN ON THAT.
08:08:17 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: WHAT EXACTLY -- WHAT THE TOTAL TREE
08:08:19 REPLACEMENT IS FOR THESE TWO GRAND TREES?
08:08:24 IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, SIR?
08:08:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, SIR.
08:08:26 YES, MA'AM.
08:08:32 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: IS -- I CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION.
08:08:35 IS BILL BORIS AVAILABLE?
08:08:41 >> YES.
08:08:42 YES, I'M AVAILABLE.
08:08:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO, BILL, DID YOU HEAR THE QUESTION?
08:08:48 >> YEAH.
08:08:50 ARE THEY GOING TO PUT ME ON THE SCREEN?
08:08:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I GUESS SOMEBODY PROBABLY NEEDS TO ASK IF
08:08:57 YOU'VE BEEN SWORN.
08:08:58 >> THERE WE GO.
08:08:58 THERE WE GO.
08:08:59 I'M BILL BORIS, NATURAL RESOURCES AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
08:09:04 >> OKAY.
08:09:04 GOOD.
08:09:05 >> YEAH.
08:09:05 I'M GOING TO -- (INAUDIBLE).
08:09:09 TO ANSWER YOUR FIRST QUESTION, THE REPLACEMENTS ARE NOT ON
08:09:13 THE FORM WITH THE TREE TABLE.
08:09:21 TO REPLACE GRAND TREES, THEY'RE VERY CLOSE TO BEING A HAZARD
08:09:26 TREE.
08:09:27 FOR THE C-10, IT'S ANOTHER -- (INAUDIBLE) -- THE CASE, I'M
08:09:38 JUST WONDERING, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE INCHES
08:09:42 REQUIRE THE REPLACEMENT ON THE P.D. SITE EVENT.
08:09:46 >> YES.
08:09:50 WE ARE THE SITE PLAN THAT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF TREES,
08:09:55 IT'S -- HAVE TO REQUEST A CERTAIN NUMBER OF TWO AND HALF
08:09:58 INCH TREES.
08:09:59 THE GRAND TREES BEING PRESENTED.
08:10:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
08:10:05 I'M GOOD.
08:10:05 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
08:10:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
08:10:08 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
08:10:10 >> YES.
08:10:11 MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY.
08:10:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
08:10:18 >> HOPEFULLY YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION FOR ME OR ASK WHO I
08:10:22 CAN ASK THE QUESTION FOR.
08:10:23 LOOKING AT THE AERIAL, THE IS NO POND CURRENTLY ON THAT
08:10:28 LAND.
08:10:28 WHAT IS THIS POND ON THE SITE PLAN?
08:10:31 WHY DOES IT HAVE TO BE THERE AND WHAT WILL IT BE USED FOR?
08:10:39 >> MARY SAMANIEGO.
08:10:40 THE POND ON THE SITE PLAN AS INDICATED IS A PROPOSED STORM
08:10:45 WATER POND FOR THE COLLECTION OF REQUIRED STORM WATER WITHIN
08:10:50 THE SITE AS PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT.
08:10:53 >> SO THEN IT'S REQUIRED.
08:10:58 IT HAS TO BE THERE, CORRECT?
08:11:01 >> YES, IT'S A VACANT PROPERTY GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF AREA
08:11:04 THEY'RE PROPOSING WITH THE CREATION OF THE FIVE LOTS WITH
08:11:07 DRIVEWAYS AND BUILDINGS, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE STORM
08:11:11 WATER SO THEY INDICATED THE STORM WATER POND ON THE SITE
08:11:14 PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE CODE.
08:11:17 >> IF THERE WAS ONLY FOUR HOMES PROPOSED FOR THIS, THAT POND
08:11:23 WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE THERE?
08:11:24 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: I CAN'T ANSWER THAT, SIR.
08:11:26 I CAN'T SPECULATE TO THAT.
08:11:28 >> OKAY.
08:11:29 I THANK YOU.
08:11:30 THANK YOU, CHAIR.
08:11:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:11:32 ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH QUESTIONS?
08:11:38 I SEE AND HEAR NONE.
08:11:40 MR. SHELBY?
08:11:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES.
08:11:42 IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT?
08:11:48 >> I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN BE HEARD.
08:11:49 JOHN (INAUDIBLE).
08:11:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THERE YOU GO.
08:12:01 GOOD EVENING.
08:12:02 WERE YOU SWORN IN AND ARE YOU PREPARED TO TESTIFY UNDER
08:12:05 OATH?
08:12:05 >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
08:12:07 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
08:12:08 FOR THE RECORD, THE CITY IS ASKING EACH APPLICANT TO CONFIRM
08:12:10 YOUR AGREEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT THE 180 DAY TIMELINE FOR
08:12:13 THE COMPLETION OF QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS IN 27-148E OF THE
08:12:18 CITY CODE AND 166 (INAUDIBLE) STATUTES IS EXTENDED.
08:12:22 DO YOU WAIVE THE 180 DAYS ON THE RECORD, SIR?
08:12:26 >> UNDERSTOOD AND WAIVED.
08:12:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, SIR.
08:12:28 MR. CHAIRMAN?
08:12:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
08:12:30 GO AHEAD, SIR.
08:12:31 YOU MAY BEGIN YOUR PRESENTATION.
08:12:34 >> ALL RIGHT.
08:12:36 I DON'T THINK THAT I HAVE MORE THAN A COUPLE ITEMS TO ADD
08:12:38 REALLY TO WHAT'S BEEN SHOWN.
08:12:41 WITH RESPECT TO THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED, SEVERAL
08:12:46 OF THEM ARE FAIRLY SIMPLE.
08:12:48 THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE ANY ISSUES WITH REVISING THE STREET
08:12:52 TO PLACE, ET CETERA.
08:12:53 THE SOLID WASTE, AGAIN, WAS RAISED.
08:12:55 THAT WILL BE SPECIFIED AND WON'T BE A PROBLEM.
08:12:58 WITH RESPECT TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES WHICH I THINK IS THE
08:13:01 THRUST OF THE CONCERNS, AGAIN, THE TWO TREES ARE DECAYING.
08:13:06 THERE IS NO ISSUE WITH THE SITE PLAN AS IT EXISTS.
08:13:10 THE REPLACEMENTS NECESSARY.
08:13:12 I DON'T SEE SOME -- I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT SPECIFICALLY
08:13:15 WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE.
08:13:17 AGAIN, AS LONG AS IT'S CONSISTENT, WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES
08:13:20 WITH THE MODIFICATIONS REQUIRING THAT.
08:13:23 I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING FOR ME.
08:13:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
08:13:26 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
08:13:28 >> MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY ASK MR. LAWLESS.
08:13:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.
08:13:33 GO AHEAD.
08:13:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
08:13:35 IF THERE WAS ONLY FOUR HOUSES ON THIS PROPERTY, WOULD THAT
08:13:38 RETENTION POND, STORM WATER POND BE NEEDED?
08:13:41 >> I BELIEVE THAT IT WOULD.
08:13:42 I'M NOT WITH POSITIVE, HOWEVER.
08:13:45 BECAUSE IT'S ENTIRELY VACANT LAND AT THIS POINT, THERE IS
08:13:49 OBVIOUSLY NO DRAINAGE ISSUES.
08:13:50 THE AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION NECESSARY EVEN IF THERE WERE FOUR
08:13:54 LOTS, THERE WOULD STILL BE, I BELIEVE, A REQUIREMENT FOR
08:13:57 SOME SORT OF DRAINAGE.
08:13:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. LAWLESS.
08:14:01 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
08:14:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WITH QUESTIONS FOR
08:14:05 THE APPLICANT?
08:14:07 I SEE AND HEAR NONE.
08:14:08 IS THERE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON
08:14:11 THIS ITEM?
08:14:12 ITEM NUMBER 6.
08:14:13 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
08:14:26 >> THERE IS NO ONE HERE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK
08:14:28 ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.
08:14:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SEEING NOTHING
08:14:33 ELSE, I'D LIKE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THERE IS
08:14:36 ANY OBJECTION. THERE IS NO OBJECTION.
08:14:41 ALL RIGHT.
08:14:42 WE GO BACK TO COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA IF YOU'D LIKE TO TAKE
08:14:45 THE ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 6.
08:14:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU.
08:14:49 CHAIR MOVES ITEM NUMBER 6REZ-1985 TO SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE
08:14:56 BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE
08:14:59 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY OF 129/130 NORTH MAXWELL
08:15:06 PLACE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, IN SECTION ONE FROM
08:15:09 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION P.D. PLAT DEVELOPMENT
08:15:12 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO P.D. PLANNED
08:15:16 DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED PROVIDING AN
08:15:19 EFFECTIVE DATE.
08:15:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THIS IS THE SUBSTITUTE, CORRECT?
08:15:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR.
08:15:27 THAT'S WHAT I READ.
08:15:28 THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE HEALTH SAFETY WELFARE OF THE
08:15:32 LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN OPERATION ACCORDING
08:15:36 WITH THE PLAN SUBMITTED.
08:15:38 IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
08:15:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THIS MOTION FROM
08:15:44 COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA?
08:15:47 >> SECOND.
08:15:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
08:15:50 MAY WE HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
08:15:54 >> VIERA.
08:15:56 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
08:15:59 >> GUDES.
08:16:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
08:16:01 >> DINGFELDER.
08:16:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
08:16:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
08:16:06 >> CARLSON?
08:16:08 CITRO?
08:16:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.
08:16:12 >> MIRANDA?
08:16:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
08:16:14 >> MOTION CARRIES WITH MANISCALCO AND CITRO VOTING NO.
08:16:20 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION HELD ON SEPTEMBER 10 AT 5:01
08:16:23 P.M.
08:16:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU.
20:15:54 WE NOW GO TO ITEM 7.
20:16:00 >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN MANASSE, PLANNING DESIGN AND
20:16:00 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 7 IS FILE NUMBER
20:16:02 REZ 20-11 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3916 NORTH
20:16:05 DARTMOUTH AVENUE.
20:16:06 THEY ARE CURRENTLY ZONED RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
20:16:07 FAMILY, AND ARE PROPOSING PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
20:16:09 OFFICE, MEDICAL, AND BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL.
20:16:11 I'LL DEFER --
20:16:17 >> MR. MANASSE, COULD I INTERRUPT, PLEASE?
20:16:20 IF WE COULD JUST ASK THE CLERK TO MAKE SURE THAT
20:16:23 EVERYBODY IS SWORN IN AND JUST ASK THEM TO RAISE THEIR
20:16:26 RIGHT HAND AND IF WE COULD GET INTO THAT HABIT, IT WOULD
20:16:29 BE A LOT EASIER SO WE DON'T HAVE TO INTERRUPT.
20:16:37 >> I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT ON.
20:16:40 >> WELL, IF THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE FOR NOW AND AS
20:16:44 LONG AS THEY ARE SWORN AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, THAT WILL
20:16:48 SATISFY ME.
20:16:55 >> DO YOU PLAN TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND
20:16:58 NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
20:16:59 >> I DO.
20:17:00 >> AND IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3916 NORTH
20:17:04 DARTMOUTH AVENUE. THEY'RE CURRENTLY ZONED RS-50 AND THAT
20:17:08 IS SINGLE RESIDENTIAL FAMILY AND PROPOSED MEDICAL AND
20:17:12 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL USE.
20:17:13 I WILL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT
20:17:16 AND THEN RETURN IT BACK TO ME, PLEASE.
20:17:27 >> DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS IF YOU COULD
20:17:32 PLEASE SHOW THE SCREEN.
20:17:34 THIS IS DANNY COLLINS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:17:43 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:17:44 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE
20:17:48 TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:17:50 AND THIS IS THE PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY WHICH IS THE
20:17:59 PARK LOCATED FOUR MILES FROM THE SITE AND THE SITE IS
20:18:02 LOCATED NEAR THE SITE, WHICH IS NOT NEAR AN EVACUATION
20:18:13 AREA AND HERE IS THE SURROUNDING SITE WITH THE SIX
20:18:16 PROPERTIES AND IT IS OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE PROPERTY.
20:18:19 IT IS RIGHT ALONG MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD, WHICH IS
20:18:28 A MIXED-USE CORRIDOR.
20:18:30 THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE SOUTH AND THERE IS ALSO
20:18:35 COMMERCIAL PREDOMINANTLY FOUND ON MARTIN LUTHER KING
20:18:43 BOULEVARD.
20:18:45 YOU WILL SEE THAT THIS HAS FUTURE LAND-USE CATEGORIES AND
20:18:48 THIS IS WITHIN THE CMU CATEGORY AND THE SOUTHERN PORTION
20:18:51 IN THIS ORANGE COLOR IS RESIDENTIAL 10 AND YOU'LL SEE
20:18:57 THAT MARTIN LUTHER KING PREDOMINANTLY HAS MU-35 AND IS
20:19:03 REPRESENTED BY THIS RED COLOR AS YOU MOVE EAST AND AS YOU
20:19:11 MOVE SOUTH ON THE SITE IT TRANSITIONS TO RESIDENTIAL 10.
20:19:18 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND
20:19:20 FOUND THE PROPOSED USE -- USE COMPATIBLE OF THE
20:19:24 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND WHILE THE APPROPRIATE
20:19:27 USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTAL
20:19:40 PATTERN FOR THE CORRIDOR AND IT IS FOR STREETSCAPES THAT
20:19:48 FORM THE CHARACTERISTICS BY THE BUSINESS ENTRANCES.
20:19:53 AND THE ENTRANCES AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING AND NOT
20:20:02 MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD.
20:20:04 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT
20:20:06 THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT BE REDESIGNED SO THE ENTRANCE TO THE
20:20:09 BUILDING IS BY MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD.
20:20:13 THIS WOULD SHOW CONSISTENCY TO THE PLANS, MIXED-USE
20:20:18 CENTERS AND APPOINTED THE STAFF CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA
20:20:22 CONFERENCE AND THAT IS MY PRESENTATION AND I'M AVAILABLE
20:20:29 FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:20:37 >> ANY QUESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS? ALL RIGHT.
20:20:40 >> DANNY COLLINS: IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:20:46 THANK YOU.
20:20:47 AND WHAT IS BEFORE YOU IS DARTMOUTH AVENUE, REZ-50, WOULD
20:20:56 ALLOW FOR MEDICAL AND PROFESSIONAL USES.
20:20:58 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
20:21:01 WEST -- DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD AND NORTH
20:21:05 DARTMOUTH AVENUE INTERSECTIONS.
20:21:08 THE LOT CONTAINS 12,520 SQUARE FEET AND THE PROPOSED USE
20:21:14 WILL CONSIST OF A 3,200 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH PARKING
20:21:19 SOUTH OF THE STRUCTURE.
20:21:20 VEHICULAR STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED ON THE NORTH SIDE AND THE
20:21:25 PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE WILL BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
20:21:29 BUILDING AND THERE WILL BE SIDEWALKS CONNECTED TO THE
20:21:32 ADJACENT SIDEWALK.
20:21:33 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A BIKE RACK JUST NORTH TO THE
20:21:36 PARKING.
20:21:36 AND THE SETBACK FOR THE SITE PLAN ARE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH,
20:21:39 10 FEET, SOUTH 15 FEET, AND WEST, TWO FEET.
20:21:43 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED TO 35 FEET AND A
20:21:47 TOTAL OF 19 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 16 PARKING
20:21:50 SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
20:21:52 THE PROPERTY HAS A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND USES IN
20:21:57 THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OR SCG TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH
20:22:07 IN THE ZONING DISTRICT.
20:22:08 A BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE IN A -- IN DEVELOPMENT
20:22:11 ZONING DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USE IN THE
20:22:15 RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE EAST.
20:22:17 THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
20:22:21 AND ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? THE BUILDING
20:22:34 COORDINATION WE REQUIRE SITE MODIFICATIONS SHOULD THE
20:22:38 COUNCIL APPROVE THIS AND THAT IS THE MODIFICATIONS AND IT
20:22:44 IS CONSISTENT.
20:22:45 THAT IS ON PAGE 4 OF YOUR STAFF REPORT.
20:22:49 THERE ARE -- SORRY.
20:22:50 THERE ARE NO HISTORIC LANDMARK STRUCTURES WITHIN 1,000
20:22:54 FEET OF THE SUB PROPERTY AND THE CURRENT PROPERTY AGAIN
20:22:56 IS ZONED RS-50 AND THE CURRENT LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 10
20:23:03 AND MIXED-USE 35.
20:23:04 THERE WAS NO VARIANCE OR RE-BOARD APPLICATIONS NO,
20:23:08 SPECIAL-USE APPLICATIONS THERE.
20:23:09 WAS A REZONING 19-36 AND NO CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATIONS
20:23:21 IN THE FINDINGS.
20:23:22 THE LAST PAGE WOULD BE REQUIRED BETWEEN THE FIRST AND
20:23:27 SECOND READINGS, SHOULD COUNCIL APPROVE THIS PETITION AND
20:23:31 THEN IT IS OUTLINED IN RED AND THIS IS, AGAIN, NORTH
20:23:36 DARTMOUTH AVENUE THERE. IS AN ASSOCIATED PORTFOLIO
20:23:39 NUMBER WITH THAT 01 ENDING ON IT WHICH IS THE PARCEL TO
20:23:42 THE NORTH.
20:23:43 AS YOU CAN SEE THE PD TO THE WEST, THE PD IS TO THE EAST.
20:23:46 THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS ZONING DISTRICT TO THE NORTH AND
20:23:49 THEN THE -- I'M SORRY, RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE
20:23:52 SOUTH.
20:23:52 THIS IS ALL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HERE.
20:23:57 SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE, THE SUBJECT SITE ITSELF HAS THE
20:24:00 CURRENT STRUCTURE IN THIS DETACHED GARAGE.
20:24:02 HERE IS TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE THE ASSOCIATED FOLIO
20:24:06 WITH THE PARCEL.
20:24:07 IT IS VACANT.
20:24:08 BOTTOM LEFT.
20:24:09 EAST MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD.
20:24:11 AND THEN BOTTOM RIGHT IS THE SUBJECT AGAIN, JUST MORE
20:24:14 STRAIGHT ON AND THE TOP LEFT PICTURE, MARTIN LUTHER KING
20:24:23 BOULEVARD AND TO THE SIDE WHICH IS 3914 NORTH DARTMOUTH
20:24:26 AVENUE AND BOTTOM LEFT EAST NEIGHBOR IS 3915 EAST
20:24:32 DARTMOUTH NEIGHBOR AND THEN TO THE RIGHT IS THE NEIGHBOR,
20:24:36 WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD.
20:24:38 IN SAYING THAT, THE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
20:24:41 REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST
20:24:43 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT
20:24:45 CODE.
20:24:46 PLEASE SEE TRANSPORTATION FINDINGS RELATED TO THE
20:24:48 REQUIRED PARKING AND COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO A LOCAL STREET
20:24:52 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
20:24:55 THE APPLICATION AND WHAT IS IDENTIFIED BY THE STAFFERS
20:24:58 BELOW, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED IN THE SITE
20:25:01 PLAN BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE
20:25:02 ORDINANCE AS IDENTIFIED.
20:25:04 AGAIN, THOSE WAIVERS, THEY ARE REQUESTING THE REQUESTED
20:25:08 WAIVERS TO THIS PD ZONING AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO ANY
20:25:11 QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
20:25:19 >> RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU.
20:25:24 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? GO AHEAD.
20:25:27 >> I SAW HIM A MINUTE AGO.
20:25:32 HELLO.
20:25:32 CAN YOU HEAR ME?
20:25:34 >> YES.
20:25:35 GOOD EVENING, MR. BENTLEY.
20:25:38 I SAW THAT YOU RAISED YOUR RIGHT HAND.
20:25:41 YOU HAVEN'T BEEN SWORN; IS THAT RIGHT?
20:25:48 >> YES.
20:25:50 THANK YOU FOR CUTTING TO THE CHASE.
20:25:53 >> MARK BENTLEY: MY NAME IS MARK BENTLEY, TAMPA, 36022.
20:26:01 I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT.
20:26:02 WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH A REZONING FROM RS-50 TO PD
20:26:06 AND 560 SQUARE FEET AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD
20:26:10 CONSIST OF EITHER PROFESSIONAL OFFICE OR MEDICAL OFFICE,
20:26:14 3200 SQUARE FEET.
20:26:15 IT WOULD BE A LOW-IMPACT PROJECT THAT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE
20:26:18 WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE OFFICE WOULD OPERATE
20:26:21 FROM 9:00 TO 5:00 APPROXIMATELY MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY.
20:26:25 THE SITE IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MLK WEST OF HIGHLAND
20:26:28 AVENUE.
20:26:32 AND THERE ARE A VARIETY OF OFFICE USES IN THIS CORRIDOR
20:26:36 AND PRIMARILY TO THE EAST AND WEST ARE COMMERCIAL
20:26:40 DEVELOPMENTS.
20:26:41 AND STAFF HAS FOUND THE USE COMPATIBLE.
20:26:43 THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DANNY HAD I THINK QUOTED THIS
20:26:46 FROM HIS REPORT.
20:26:51 THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT OF THE AREA, THE STAFF HAS PROPOSED
20:26:55 THAT THE PD IS COMPARABLE TO THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
20:26:59 PATTERN AND WHAT THE PLANNING IS TAKES ISSUE WITH IS THE
20:27:07 ACCESS TO THE REAR, WHICH I CAN EXPLAIN IN A COUPLE OF
20:27:09 MINUTES.
20:27:10 ONE OF THE WAIVERS RELATES -- ONE OF THE WAIVERS RELATES
20:27:17 TO THE THOUSANDS AND A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IS 37.2.
20:27:21 SO WE'RE PROVIDING 16 SPACES WHEN THE CODE REQUIRES 19.
20:27:26 WE WOULD ONLY NEED 10 FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
20:27:32 CAN AND WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT IT WELL ALL DUE RESPECT,
20:27:37 YOUR CODE IS SOMEWHAT ANTIQUATED AND IT HAS COME EN VOGUE
20:27:46 IN THE LAST FEW YEARS IS AND THE CITY IS LOOKING AT THE
20:27:53 AREAS.
20:27:53 AND IT IS UNREALISTIC ON BUFFERS AND A PARK, FOR EXAMPLE,
20:28:02 IN THE GREENS.
20:28:03 IN ANY EVENT, WE BELIEVE THAT PROVIDING A BIKE RACK WHERE
20:28:08 A BUS STOP IS OUT THE FRONT DOOR OF THE PROJECT, THIS
20:28:11 WOULD JUSTIFY THE REDUCTION OF THREE PARKING SPACES
20:28:18 NOTABLY, YOUR STAFF WILL REPORTS ON THAT.
20:28:29 AND THE PARKING IS PRETTY RELEVANT FOR THIS PARKING
20:28:33 CORRIDOR.
20:28:34 I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BUILDING LOCATION AND ACCESS
20:28:36 ISSUE.
20:28:37 SO WE'RE DEALING WITH ACCESS THAT FLORIDA'S DEPARTMENT OF
20:28:44 TRANSPORTATION HAS JURISDICTION OVER MLK, SO THEY WOULD
20:28:47 NOT GIVE US AN ACCESS MANAGEMENT OR DRIVEWAY PERMIT
20:28:50 DIRECTLY TO MLK.
20:28:52 SO THE ONLY CHOICE WE WOULD HAVE IS TO GO DOWN DARTMOUTH
20:28:56 AND REQUEST A WAIVER TO ACCESS A RESIDENTIAL STREET.
20:28:58 AND TRANSPORTATION DICTATED AND I DON'T KNOW WHY WE HAVE
20:29:05 THE ABILITY TO PULL THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW COUNCIL.
20:29:14 >> IF YOU WANT TO GIVE ME ACCESS TO MY COMPUTER, I CAN IT
20:29:26 SHOULD BE ON YOUR SCREEN.
20:29:38 >> OKAY.
20:29:39 GREAT.
20:29:39 THIS IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DARTMOUTH.
20:29:42 THIS IS WHERE THE CITY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
20:29:44 WANTED THIS DRIVEWAY CONNECTION.
20:29:46 THEY WANTED IT AS FAR POSSIBLE ON DARTMOUTH DIRECTLY
20:29:50 ACROSS FROM THE OTHER DRIVEWAY.
20:29:52 SO ONCE THIS MAJOR FACTOR COMES INTO PLAY, THE ONLY
20:29:55 LOCATION FOR THE BUILDING IS, OBVIOUSLY, TO PUSH IT
20:30:00 TOWARD MLK AND, OBVIOUSLY, THE PLAN, THERE ARE SEVERAL
20:30:04 POLICIES THAT ENCOURAGE THE LOCATION ON THE STREET.
20:30:17 SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TO DEAL WITH, THE TRANSPORTATION.
20:30:19 SO THIS THEN DICTATES THAT PARKING IS IN THE REAR OF THE
20:30:23 BUILDING, AS WELL AS THE BUILDING ACCESS.
20:30:26 AND WHEN YOU THINK OF IT, IT MAKES SENSE.
20:30:29 THIS IS A MEDICAL FACILITY AND MANY PEOPLE WOULD FIND IT
20:30:33 DIFFICULT TO PARK AND WALK AROUND TO THE REAR TO ACCESS
20:30:36 THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING.
20:30:37 YOU'LL HEAR A CASE IN A LITTLE WHILE, ANOTHER ONE OF MY
20:30:40 CASES.
20:30:40 IT'S ON THE OTHER CORNER.
20:30:42 ACTUALLY, THERE IS A SIGN ON THE FRONT DOOR AND I DIDN'T
20:30:45 POST IT.
20:30:46 AND IT SAYS IT HAS A FRONT DOOR ON MLK AND IT SAYS,
20:30:50 "PLEASE USE SIDE DOOR" WHERE THE PARKING IS.
20:31:01 SO TO FORCE SOMEONE TO GET OUT OF THE MEDICAL FACILITY,
20:31:07 WE HAD A DESIGN OF EVERY ASPECT THAT WE COULD AND THE
20:31:22 PRIVACY THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE FRONT FOR THE
20:31:25 SAKE OF MEETING PLANNING DESIGN ASPIRATIONAL GOAL.
20:31:30 YOU KNOW, HAVING THE ACCESS ON THE FRONT MIGHT MAKE SENSE
20:31:33 FOR OTHER ALTERNATIVE USES LIKE RETAIL, SOMETHING LIKE
20:31:36 THAT, BUT NOT FOR A MEDICAL FACILITY.
20:31:44 SO BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THEY SAID IT WAS
20:31:47 CREDIBLE FOR THE AREA AND IT REFERENCES 19 GOALS AND
20:31:50 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT THEY APPLY TO THIS
20:31:53 APPLICATION.
20:31:54 MOST OF THEM SUPPORT THE PROJECT.
20:31:55 BUT THEY THEN SEE IT PRIMARILY TO THE ACCESS OF THE
20:31:59 BUILDING BECAUSE IT IS LOCATED TO THE REAR.
20:32:01 I JUST TOLD YOU WHY THIS IS THE SITUATION.
20:32:03 LET'S TAKE A BRIEF LOOK AT THIS POLICY.
20:32:05 IT'S ON PAGE 3 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, POLICY
20:32:10 6.1.2.
20:32:12 IT SAYS, FIRST OF ALL, ACCESS TO THE FRONT IS NOT
20:32:15 REQUIRED.
20:32:15 IT SAYS IT'S ENCOURAGED.
20:32:18 IT'S ENCOURAGED THROUGH REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS,
20:32:21 RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE, RETAIL, SERVICE POTENTIAL, AND
20:32:25 OTHER PEDESTRIAN LAND USES AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED
20:32:32 USES ALONG MIXED-USE CORRIDORS AND BY PLACING THEM TO THE
20:32:37 FRONT THE PROPERTIES WITH RUNNING STREETS.
20:32:43 FIRST OF ALL, IN THIS LIST OF ALTERNATIVE USES THERE, WAS
20:32:47 NO MENTION OF ANY PROFESSIONAL OR MEDICAL OFFICE BUT
20:32:49 THAT'S NOT 1 OF THE SPECIFIED USES IN THIS POLICY IT'S
20:32:58 NOT RETAIL BUT EVEN IF IT IS MENTIONED ENCOURAGED.
20:33:07 AND THEN YOU HAVE REFERENCE TO POLICY 6.15.
20:33:11 IT IS LOCATED ON PAGE 3 OF THE REPORT WHICH STATES IN
20:33:14 PART, "REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ALONG MIXED-USE CORRIDORS
20:33:20 WITH BUILDINGS ALONG THE STREET AND TRANSIT SERVICES."
20:33:24 WE'VE GOT THESE CONFLICTING POLICIES.
20:33:25 ONE POLICY SAYS PUT YOUR BUILDING IN THE FRONT, OKAY?
20:33:29 WHICH WE'VE DONE.
20:33:30 ANOTHER ONE SAYS, OH, BY THE WAY, HAVE YOUR ACCESS TO THE
20:33:33 FRONT, WHICH IS REALLY UNREALISTIC AND IT DOESN'T MAKE
20:33:37 SENSE IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION.
20:33:39 SO WE'RE TRYING TO BALANCE THESE TWO POLICIES, ALONG WITH
20:33:41 THE MANDATE FROM TRANSPORTATION AS TO WHERE AND HOW WE
20:33:44 ACCESS THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS PRETTY DIFFICULT.
20:33:58 AND TO LET YOU KNOW, WE REGISTERED 10 ASSOCIATIONS.
20:34:01 I'VE PERSONALLY NOT RECEIVED ANY CONTACT WHATSOEVER.
20:34:08 BE AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE RECEIVED ANYTHING AS WELL.
20:34:12 SO WE WOULD REFER TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE STAFF AND
20:34:16 THE SITE PLAN.
20:34:16 WE BELIEVE THAT EVERYTHING AS CONSIDERED WE MADE A
20:34:19 GOOD-FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE CODES AND
20:34:23 RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:34:26 AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
20:34:28 >> ALL RIGHT.
20:34:29 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME?
20:34:34 COUNCILMAN?
20:34:40 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:34:41 MR. BENTLEY, I SEE YOU ARE OFFERING BUFFERS.
20:34:46 WHAT HOURS IS THIS GOING TO BE GOING?
20:34:50 >> MARK BENTLEY: AND THEY TOLD ME -- AND THESE ARE
20:34:58 DOCTORS -- 9:00 TO 5:00 FIVE DAYS A WEEK.
20:35:07 >> AND I'M ASSUMING THAT THE REDUCTION OF THE BUFFERS,
20:35:11 YOU WILL BE CLOSING AT 5:00, AND THERE SHOULDN'T BE TOO
20:35:15 MUCH TRAFFIC COMING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPERTY?
20:35:18 >> MARK BENTLEY: YES.
20:35:21 AND I THINK PRIMARILY AND THIS IS THE WAY SHE'S
20:35:24 DEVELOPMENTS IN THESE SMALL LOTS ON MLK, IT IS 12,500
20:35:31 SQUARE FEET.
20:35:32 IF YOU HAD TO MEET THESE BUFFER WAS RESPECT TO THE REAR
20:35:35 AND BOTH SIDES, WOULD YOU CONSUME ABOUT 30% OF THE
20:35:38 PROPERTY, IF NOT MORE, JUST ALLOCATED TO BUFFERS.
20:35:41 SO WHAT WE DID, WE SOUGHT BUFFERS THAT WERE PRETTY
20:35:44 TRADITIONAL ON MLK.
20:35:48 FOR EXAMPLE, MR. CITRO, ON THE SOUTH WE HAD A BUFFER WITH
20:35:52 15 FEET MASONRY WALL AND SEVEN FEET WITH A SOLID FENCE.
20:35:55 IF YOU GO UP AND DOWN MLK, YOU'LL SEE THESE REDEVELOPMENT
20:36:00 PROJECTS HAVE THIS SAME REDUCTION.
20:36:02 AND THE SAME TO THE WEST, 15 FEET.
20:36:06 IT IS REQUIRED A 6-FOOT WALL.
20:36:08 AND WE REQUEST SEVEN FEET.
20:36:10 >> JOSEPH CITRO: AND THE ONLY REASON I AM ASKING, FENCES
20:36:16 MAKE GOOD NEIGHBORS.
20:36:17 IF I WAS ENCROACHING ON RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL, I WOULD
20:36:21 SURELY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT MY NEIGHBORS WERE HAPPY AND
20:36:24 THEY WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY ANY CAR NOISE, ANY
20:36:27 HEADLIGHTS GOING OFF AT DUSK OR DURING THE NIGHT.
20:36:30 SO THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION.
20:36:32 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:36:38 >> AND THE LIMITED USES, TOO.
20:36:41 IF YOU LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, THE ONLY ONES THAT CAN GO
20:36:45 ON THIS PROPERTY ARE PROFESSIONAL OR MEDICAL OFFICES.
20:36:48 THERE'S NO COMMERCIAL OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
20:36:53 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:36:54 ARE THERE ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH QUESTIONS AT
20:36:56 THIS TIME? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
20:37:16 ANYBODY AT THE CONVENTION CENTER FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? I
20:37:23 HEAR NONE.
20:37:23 ANYTHING ELSE FROM ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS? ANY OTHER
20:37:26 DISCUSSION? OKAY.
20:37:27 I'M GOING TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING, UNLESS THERE'S
20:37:30 ANY OBJECTION ALL RIGHT.
20:37:38 THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
20:37:40 WHO IS IT THAT READ IT THE LAST TIME?
20:37:43 I BELIEVE IT WAS COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
20:37:46 NOW WE GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER CITRO.
20:37:51 YOU'RE MUTED, MR. CHAIR.
20:37:53 >> JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
20:37:59 AND WE HAVE A REZONING FOR PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
20:38:03 VICINITY OF 3916 NORTH DARTMOUTH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF
20:38:07 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ZONING
20:38:10 CLASSIFICATION, RS-50, SINGLE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL
20:38:14 FAMILY, PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, MEDICAL, THIS IS
20:38:18 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND THE
20:38:21 PETITIONER DID MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF.
20:38:24 AND THE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ACCEPTABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES,
20:38:27 AND POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:38:29 IF THE WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
20:38:32 27-134-4 -- 139-4, SUCH A DESIGN OF DEVELOPMENT IS
20:38:40 UNIQUE, THEREFORE, IT MEETS THE WAIVERS.
20:38:43 THE REQUESTED WAIVERS ARE NOT TO SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE
20:38:46 WITH INJURY OR THE RIGHTS OF OTHER PROPERTY WOULD BE
20:38:48 AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
20:38:50 I WILL INCLUDE THE WAIVERS AND THE REVISIONS BETWEEN
20:38:52 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:38:56 >> SECOND.
20:38:57 WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO WITH A SECOND FROM
20:39:01 COUNCILMAN VIERA IF WE COULD HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
20:39:11 >> COUNCILMAN VIERA?
20:39:13 >> YES.
20:39:14 >> GUDES?
20:39:14 >> YES.
20:39:14 >> CARLSON?
20:39:18 >> (NO RESPONSE)
20:39:20 >> CITRO?
20:39:31 >> YES.
20:39:32 >> YES.
20:39:32 >> YES.
20:39:34 >> MOTION IS CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT. THE
20:39:34 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD SEPTEMBER 10TH
20:39:34 AT 5:01 P.M.
20:39:40 >> THANK YOU. WE MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.
20:39:48 >> MICHEL MATOS: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
20:39:56 DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND
20:39:59 NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
20:40:00 >> I DO.
20:40:00 >> THANK YOU.
20:40:01 >> ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201
20:40:05 NORTH 26th STREET.
20:40:08 THEY'RE CURRENTLY ZONED 16 WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL
20:40:10 MULTI-FAMILY AND THEY ARE PROPOSED A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
20:40:14 FOR SEMI DETACHED AND I'LL REFER TO DANNY COLLINS FOR THE
20:40:22 REPORT AND THEN COME BACK TO ME.
20:40:31 >> DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS.
20:40:34 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN AND THE NEXT IS WITH THE SPECIFICALLY
20:40:41 PALMETTO BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:40:42 AND THE PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY AT THE PARK WHICH IS
20:40:45 LOCATED WITHIN 1/4th OF A MILE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT
20:40:49 SITE.
20:40:49 THE SITE IS IN THE COASTAL AREA AND THE SITE IS IN A
20:40:52 LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
20:40:56 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SUBJECT
20:41:05 SITE IS SHOWN HERE IN THE CORNER OF NORTHEAST CLARK AND
20:41:28 YOU'LL SEE THIS IS SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE AND THIS IS THE
20:41:31 MAP AND THE SITE IS SHOWN HERE IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
20:41:34 THE SITE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 35 USE CATEGORY WHICH
20:41:40 ALLOWS FOR 35 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:41:50 AND SOUTH OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL AND WHEN YOU GET
20:41:53 FURTHER SOUTH AND GO NORTH, THAT TAN COLOR IS RESIDENTIAL
20:41:57 10.
20:42:04 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND IT
20:42:10 WAS THE FUTURE LAND USE RESIDENTIAL 20 TO LAND USE 35 AND
20:42:16 THE REPORT IS FOR LOW-DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY AREAS TO
20:42:20 PROVIDE FOR DENSITIES.
20:42:24 AND THE PUD WILL ALLOW FOR SCALABLE DEVELOPMENT AND FOR
20:42:28 TRANSITION TO THE EAST AND WEST AND THE RESIDENTIAL 10 TO
20:42:31 THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:42:34 REDEVELOPMENT OF SOME SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS
20:42:37 POLICIES, HOUSING POLICY, 1.3.4 AND POLICY 2.1.2, WHICH
20:42:45 ENCOURAGES NEW DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT LAND AND WITH THAT
20:42:50 REQUEST, THE COMMISSION HAS THAT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
20:42:57 THE CITY OF TAMPA PLAN.
20:43:00 >> COUNCIL MEMBERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING
20:43:03 NONE, MR. MANASSE?
20:43:16 >>RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU.
20:43:17 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY TO
20:43:23 ALLOW FOR A TOTAL OF EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
20:43:27 DWELLING UNITS AND ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING
20:43:31 UNIT.
20:43:32 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH CORNER OF EAST
20:43:35 26th STREET OF THE INTERSECTION AND THE LOT CONTAINS
20:43:38 19 -- I'M SORRY, 19,954 SQUARE FEET FOR A TOTAL OF
20:43:44 .64 ACRES.
20:43:45 THE ONE BUILDING UNIT PROPOSED FRONT ENTRY AND A COVERED
20:43:49 PORCH ON THE WEST.
20:43:51 AND THE TWO BUILDINGS PROPOSES A ENTRY TO THE SOUTH WITH
20:43:57 TWO COVERED AREAS IN THE REAR AND IT CONSISTS OF 11 UNIT
20:44:01 AND 42-UNITS AND THE SITE PLAN AS BUILDING ONE PROPOSES
20:44:06 VEHICULAR PARKING IN THE WEST WITH ACCESS ALONG NORTH
20:44:09 26th STREET AND BUILDINGS TWO THROUGH 5 PROPOSE
20:44:12 VEHICULAR ACCESS AND PARKING TO THE SOUTH THAT. WOULD BE
20:44:15 ON EAST CLARK STREET WITH A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT BEING
20:44:18 PROPOSED AT 35 FEET.
20:44:21 THE SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH, 15 FEET; SOUTH, 25
20:44:27 FEAST; EAST, FIVE FEET EAST AND WEST, SEVEN FEET.
20:44:31 A TOTAL OF 20 PARK SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 18 PARKING
20:44:35 SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
20:44:36 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
20:44:39 AND MULTI-FAMILY USES IN THE RS-50 AND RS-50 ZONING
20:44:44 DISTRICTS TO THE NORTH.
20:44:45 AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY USES IN THE RM ZONING DISTRICTS TO
20:44:49 THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST.
20:44:51 AND THE SITE PLAN'S ON THE SCREEN.
20:44:54 IT IS GOING TO GO TO ANY OF THE SETBACKS THAT I HAVE
20:44:58 DESCRIBED PREVIOUSLY HERE.
20:45:00 I'LL LEAVE IT UP WHILE I GO THROUGH THE REST OF THIS
20:45:03 REPORT AND THE PLAN HAS FURTHER SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
20:45:08 THAT WE DO REQUIRE ON PAGE 2 AND ALSO THE CITY OF TAMPA
20:45:20 SHEET AND THEY DO REQUEST MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE EAR WISE
20:45:23 CONSISTENT WHILE OTHER SITE PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
20:45:27 THEY WILL REQUIRE OTHER SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS AS WELL
20:45:30 THAT WILL BE LISTED WITHIN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
20:45:32 THERE ARE NOTHING WITHIN 6,000 FEET FROM THE SITE AND
20:45:44 WITH THE FUTURE LANDS USE BEING RESIDENTIAL 35.
20:45:48 THERE WERE NO VARIANCES FOUND OR SPECIAL-USE
20:45:51 APPLICATIONS, REZONING APPLICATIONS.
20:45:53 AND, AGAIN, ON PAGE 10 AND 11 OF THE STAFF REPORT, YOU
20:45:56 WILL SEE THE REVISIONS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED BETWEEN
20:45:59 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:46:00 THE SITE CONSISTS OF TWO SHEETS, AND THEN THE AERIAL MAP
20:46:05 WILL SHOW YOU THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS OUTLINED IN RED.
20:46:08 YOU SEE THAT RM-16 TO THE NORTH, AND THEN THE REST OF THE
20:46:11 ZONING AROUND HERE IS R -- THAT AS WELL AND RS-50 IS TO
20:46:19 THE NORTH.
20:46:20 AND OVER TO THE SOUTH A LITTLE BIT.
20:46:22 BUT, AGAIN, THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
20:46:26 AND I'VE GOT SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE ITSELF AND THIS IS
20:46:34 LOOKING TO THE EAST AND THIS SITE MORE OR LESS LOOKING TO
20:46:37 THE NORTH, AGAIN, THE NORTH OF THE OTHER END OF THIS
20:46:59 LARGE TREE. THIS IS LOOKING TO THE EAST. THIS IS
20:46:59 ACTUALLY THE PARTIALLY VACATED ALLEYWAY. THIS IS THE
20:46:59 WEST NEIGHBOR, 2422 EAST CLARK AND THEN 2603, MAKONEY,
20:47:04 WHICH IS MIXED USE AND THE OTHER SOUTH NEIGHBOR, CLARK
20:47:09 AND 2625 EAST CLARK.
20:47:12 THAT BEING SAID, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE
20:47:15 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST
20:47:18 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT USE
20:47:21 AND PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDING WITH TRANSPORTATION
20:47:25 REFERRED TO IN THE PARKING WAIVER THAT. IS ALSO OUTLINED
20:47:27 IN THE WAIVER ON PAGE 1.
20:47:29 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
20:47:32 THE WAIVERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT FOR THE
20:47:34 MODIFICATIONS IN THIS REPORT AND ON THE REVISION REPORT
20:47:37 ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE
20:47:39 ORDINANCE.
20:47:40 THE STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY MORE QUESTIONS THAT YOU
20:47:43 MAY HAVE.
20:47:46 COUNCIL MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS MR. DINGFELDER?
20:48:10 >> JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:48:16 SO WHAT IS IT THAT THE HOUSES ON CLARK ARE GOING TO BE
20:48:18 LOOKING AT? THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT A WALL,
20:48:21 THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT LANDSCAPING.
20:48:31 OR ARE THEY GOING TO BE LOOKING AT THE FRONT DOORS?
20:48:34 >> YES.
20:48:34 SO YOU CAN LOOK AT HERE FROM THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS
20:48:37 PROVIDED.
20:48:37 FROM THE ALLEY SIDE YOU CAN SEE HERE.
20:48:39 THIS IS THE BACK AREA.
20:48:40 SO THE SOUTH WOULD BE THE -- THE REAR OR THE ENTRANCE OF
20:48:43 THIS -- THIS WEST UNIT.
20:48:46 AND THEN YOU SEE THE 4 OTHER BUILDINGS RIGHT HERE, WHERE
20:48:48 THERE'S A GARAGE, AS WELL AS THE FRONT DOOR.
20:48:51 BUT I PROBABLY WANT TO DEFER TO THE SITE PLAN WHEN THOSE
20:49:00 QUESTIONS COME BUT THOSE WERE TO THE SITE PLAN.
20:49:04 >> AND WHEN YOU MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION, IF YOU COULD
20:49:07 ADDRESS THAT, THANK YOU.
20:49:09 >> ALL RIGHT.
20:49:09 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
20:49:15 >> I SHOULD BE UNMUTED.
20:49:16 AM I COMING THROUGH? WE HEAR YOU.
20:49:19 BUT FIRST WE GO TO MR. SHELBY.
20:49:21 MR. SHELBY, DID YOU ALREADY SPEAK WITH THE APPLICANT?
20:49:26 >> MR. SHELBY: NO, I HAVE NOT.
20:49:30 I NEED TO BE SWORN IN.
20:49:31 >> HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN?
20:49:33 >> MR. SHELBY: I HAVE NOT.
20:49:36 WE ARE WAIVING THE 180-DAY RESTRICTION.
20:49:52 >> MICHEL MATOS: RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
20:49:57 DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND
20:49:59 NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
20:50:01 >> I DO.
20:50:01 AND YOU AGREE TO WAIVE THE 180-DAY TIMELINE? YOU AGREE
20:50:06 TO DO THAT ON THE RECORD?
20:50:07 >> YES.
20:50:08 WE WAIVE IT.
20:50:08 THIS PRODUCT IS FAIRLY UNIQUE, IN THAT THERE USED TO BE A
20:50:12 CIGAR FACTORY THAT OCCUPIED THIS SITE THAT BURNED DOWN
20:50:16 AND THEN WAS REMOVED.
20:50:17 SO THIS WILL BE A MAJOR INVESTMENT IN RESIDENTIAL
20:50:24 DEVELOPMENT IN WILL PALMETTO BEACH.
20:50:27 EACH OF THE UNITS WERE SUPPLIED WITH TWO PARKING SPACES.
20:50:31 ONE IS INSIDE A GARAGE AND THE OTHER IS ON THE APRON.
20:50:41 SIXTEEN UNITS WOULD BE ALLOWED AND WE'RE PROPOSING NINE
20:50:45 UNITS, ONE OF WHICH IS A SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNING UNIT.
20:50:48 AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, THIS PROPERTY HAS A RES USE
20:50:56 OF 35, WHICH WOULD ALLOW THOSE 16 UNITS.
20:50:59 THERE IS ALMOST 1,600 SQUARE FEET AND IT IS CLOSE TO A
20:51:14 PARK.
20:51:14 AND THE OBJECTION FROM TRANSPORTATION WAS BASED UPON OUR
20:51:20 INABILITY TO PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL TWO SPACES FOR
20:51:24 VISITOR AND GUEST PARKING THE PROPERTY HAS THE HOUSING
20:51:36 THAT IS SO BADLY NEEDED AND WE CONSIDER THIS TO BE ENTRY
20:51:40 LEVEL IN TERMS OF HOUSING.
20:51:41 THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT'S CHEAP BUT IT'S ENTRY LEVEL,
20:51:44 ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT MARKET.
20:51:48 THE -- THE CODE REQUIRES OR IS ASKING TO YOU HAVE A
20:51:51 FLEXIBLE LAND-USE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH THIS IS ONE OF THOSE
20:51:54 TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS AND TO PROMOTE ARCHITECTURAL
20:51:59 DESIGNS AND FEATURES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA,
20:52:03 ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE TRUE FOR THIS PROJECT.
20:52:11 RYAN PROVIDED YOU WITH THAT AND WE'RE GOING ABOVE AND
20:52:21 BEYOND TO TRY TO ENCOURAGE COME -- SOME ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN
20:52:26 USES -- SOME ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN USES HERE FOR THOSE
20:52:32 PURPOSES.
20:52:33 THE DESIGN IS COMPATIBLE.
20:52:35 IT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS.
20:52:37 IT IS IN HARMONY WITH THE PLANNING, LAND-USE DESIGNATION
20:52:41 AND THEY DID A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT INTO AN AREA WHICH
20:52:45 HAS NOT HAD MUCH INVESTMENT.
20:52:47 TO ANSWER MR. DINGFELDER'S QUESTION -- CAN YOU PUT THAT
20:52:58 UP PLEASE.
20:53:00 >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE ME ACCESS? MR. CREW, COULD YOU
20:53:08 PLEASE GIVE ME ACCESS?
20:53:12 >> IF YOU LOOK AT THE TWO DOORS ON EACH OF THOSE UNITS,
20:53:15 YOU WILL SEE THAT THEY FACE CLARK.
20:53:17 THERE IS NO WALL THAT IS GOING TO BE IN FRONT OF THEM SO
20:53:21 WE'RE, AGAIN, ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND MOBILITY
20:53:25 AROUND THE AREA.
20:53:26 WE HAVE A LOT OF AMENITIES AND IN THE PALMETTO BEACH,
20:54:05 THERE IS NOT MANY OBJECTION, TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
20:54:08 NOBODY HAS WRITTEN ANY CONCERN OR OBJECTION.
20:54:10 WE ARE SENSITIVE TO CONCERN IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
20:54:13 AREA.
20:54:14 AND AS RYAN POINTED OUT, THE OBJECTION IS COMING FROM
20:54:34 TRANSPORTATION BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE
20:54:36 TWO SPACES.
20:54:37 WE PLAN TO RELY ON THE ON-STREET PARKING FOR THAT.
20:54:41 WHEN WE ORIGINALLY FILED THIS, WE DID NOT HAVE
20:54:44 CONFIRMATION THAT ALLEY IN THE BACK WAS VACATED, AND WE
20:55:01 SHOW THAT ON THE PLAN AND WE'LL BE MODIFYING THE SITE
20:55:04 PLAN FOR THE UNITS.
20:55:16 AND THEY WANTED US TO CHANGE THE DRIVEWAY TO ACCOMMODATE
20:55:19 THEM.
20:55:19 I'LL BE HAPPY TO ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
20:55:22 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:55:23 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS?
20:55:27 COUNCILMAN CITRO?
20:55:31 >> JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
20:55:37 AND THIS WAS DOWN TO 9.78.
20:55:41 WHERE DID THE 9.78 COME FROM?
20:55:44 >> THAT IS AN ENGINEERING QUESTION THAT I CAN'T REALLY
20:55:48 ANSWER.
20:55:48 >> AND COUNCILMAN CITRO, IT IS PART OF THE ZONING CODE.
20:55:56 WHEN YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE SEPARATED
20:55:58 LIKE THIS, THERE IS A FORMULA THAT IS REQUIRED.
20:56:01 AS YOU'LL NOTICE, ON PAGE 2 OF YOUR STAFF REPORT AND THE
20:56:05 SITE PLAN MODS IF A INDICATION, THE NUMBER THAT WE GOT IS
20:56:08 BECAUSE WE APPLIED THE FORMULA THAT TELLS YOU WHAT IS
20:56:11 REQUIRED BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND THAT'S
20:56:14 WHERE STAFF CONCLUDED IT WAS 9.78 FEET WHERE THEY ARE
20:56:19 SHOWING EIGHT FEET.
20:56:20 SO THAT IS WHERE THE WAIVERS ARE COMING IN IN OUR SECTION
20:56:28 ON THAT.
20:56:29 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. MANASEE.
20:56:31 I'VE NEVER SEEN 9.78 FEET.
20:56:34 I'VE SEEN 10, I'VE SEEN SEVEN, BUT NOTHING LIKE THAT.
20:56:38 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANSWER.
20:56:39 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:56:39 ARE THERE ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH QUESTIONS FOR
20:56:41 THE APPLICANT? IS THERE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT
20:56:44 WISHES TO SPEAK? THERE IS ONE PERSON HERE TO SPEAK.
20:57:19 >> WHICHEVER WAY YOU WANT TO DO IT.
20:57:23 >> I LIVE AT 2616 EAST CLARK STREET.
20:57:26 >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD BEFORE YOU
20:57:28 SPEAK.
20:57:28 >> I LIVE AT 26 -- I'M SORRY.
20:57:33 I CAN'T HEAR YOU?
20:57:34 >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
20:57:36 WE NEED YOUR NAME BEFORE YOU SPEAK.
20:57:38 >> SURE.
20:57:39 VINCENT PEREZ.
20:57:42 >> OKAY.
20:57:42 MR. PEREZ, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES AND I'LL START THE
20:57:45 CLOCK NOW.
20:57:49 >> OKAY.
20:57:49 JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
20:57:51 I LIVE AT 2616 AND ALSO THE NEIGHBOR AT 2612 EAST CLARK
20:57:58 STREET ARE HERE.
20:57:58 AND THE CONCERN WE ALREADY HAVE A DRAIN PROBLEM AT 26th
20:58:07 AND CLARK WITH ALL OF THIS ADDITIONAL CEMENT WITH THESE
20:58:11 SLABS, OUR CONCERN IS THAT THAT WATER IS GOING TO COME
20:58:14 BACK AND COME INTO OUR PROPERTY AT 2612 OR 2616.
20:58:17 SO I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH DEVELOPING THE LAND.
20:58:20 I -- I LIKE WHAT I SAW.
20:58:25 THE BIGGEST CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS WE ALREADY HAVE A
20:58:27 DRAINING PROBLEM ON THAT STREET.
20:58:29 WE WERE TOLD THAT WHEN THEY DID THE WORK, THEY COULD NOT
20:59:00 HAVE THAT THERE AND NOW WE ARE CONCERNED WHAT WE'RE
20:59:02 FACING WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THAT WATER.
20:59:04 BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT IT COMING INTO OUR YARD.
20:59:13 >> DO WE HAVE ANYBODY THAT CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION?
20:59:27 MR. MANASSE, GO AHEAD.
20:59:32 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES.
20:59:34 AND WHAT I CAN SAY IS THAT THEY DESIGNED THIS FOR THE
20:59:43 WATER RUNOFF.
20:59:44 >> DID YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, SIR? ALSO, LET ME STATE FOR
20:59:48 THE RECORD -- SHOULD I WAIT FOR HIM? LET ME PUT ON THE
20:59:52 RECORD --
20:59:53 >> I CANNOT HEAR.
20:59:55 FROM THIS AREA I CANNOT HEAR.
20:59:56 >> IS THAT BACKGROUND NOISE FROM THE CONVENTION CENTER?
21:00:00 MR. CHAIRMAN? COULD YOU COMMENT ON THAT?
21:00:04 >> YES.
21:00:05 THERE ARE A FEW PEOPLE IN THE CROWD THAT ARE WITH THIS
21:00:08 GENTLEMAN, BUT ARE NOT SPEAKING AND MR. MANASSE IS
21:00:37 SPEAKING AND THE SITE REVIEW AND THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION
21:00:39 HERE WILL HAVE AN UNDERGROUND STORM WATER VAULT OF SOME
21:00:43 SORT TO RETAIN THAT STORM WATER THAT IS FALLING ON THE
21:00:49 PROPERTY AND, THEREFORE, HOPEFULLY, ANSWERING HIS
21:00:52 QUESTION AND RELIEVING HIS CONCERNS AND WHAT HE SAID
21:00:55 REGARDING STREET FLOODING.
21:00:56 SO BASICALLY THE PROPERTY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE
21:00:59 CARE OF THE RAIN WATER THAT WILL BE FALLING IN ORDER TO
21:01:03 PREVENT THAT STREET FLOODING AND TRY TO MAKE IT, YOU
21:01:07 KNOW, AS PASSIBLE AS POSSIBLE AND PREVENT ANY KIND OF YOU
21:01:35 KNOW, STORM WATER IS NOT SOMETHING THAT CAN BE RETAINED.
21:01:38 AND IT IS ON THE SITE.
21:01:39 SO YOU CAN'T DUMP WATER ON SOMEBODY ELSE'S ADJACENT
21:01:43 PROPERTY AND THE STORM WATER STRUCTURE WE HAVE PROPOSED
21:01:47 WILL MEET THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE.
21:01:56 >> ALL RIGHT.
21:01:57 SIR, TO THE GENTLEMAN THAT WAS SPEAKING, DOES THAT ANSWER
21:02:00 YOUR QUESTION?
21:02:00 >> MR. PEREZ: WELL, I HEARD HALF OF YOUR QUESTION AND
21:02:05 WHAT THE GENTLEMAN SAID.
21:02:07 AGAIN, IT IS NOT THAT I'M AGAINST BUILDING THE PROPERTY.
21:02:10 IT IS THAT I HAVE A CURRENT PROBLEM NOW.
21:02:13 AND WE'VE ADDRESSED IT AND I'VE COMPLAINED ABOUT THE
21:02:16 WATER.
21:02:16 ONE TIME THEY SAID WE WOULD BRING PUMPS TO PUMP THE WATER
21:02:19 OUT.
21:02:20 I'M JUST CONCERNED IF WE'RE FACING IT NOW, WHAT IS GOING
21:02:23 TO HAPPEN WHEN MORE SLABS AND CEMENT COME INTO THIS
21:02:26 CORNER? AND THAT'S THE CONCERN THAT WE ALL HAVE THERE
21:02:35 AND IF YOU THINK IT IS NOT A PROBLEM, SO FAR, IT IS A
21:02:37 PROBLEM.
21:02:38 I'VE CALLED THE CITY AND IT'S BEEN ADDRESSED BUT, STILL,
21:02:41 EVERY TIME IT RAINS, WE FACE THIS ALL OF THE TIME.
21:02:57 >> AND WHAT YOU SAID, A STORM VAULT WOULD BE BUILT ON
21:03:01 THIS PROPERTY AND IT WOULD RETAIN THE STORM WATER AND
21:03:03 THAT IS SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT EXIST, BUT WOULD EXIST
21:03:06 UPON CONSTRUCTION OF THIS.
21:03:07 SO SOMETHING NEW WOULD BE ADDED THAT WOULD HOLD THE RAIN
21:03:20 WATER.
21:03:21 >> MR. PEREZ: AND I THANK YOU.
21:03:26 AND I WELCOME WHAT IS COMING.
21:03:29 AND SOMETHING IS GOING TO BE BUILT THAT IS NOT THERE NOW,
21:03:33 SO WE'LL HANDLE THE SITUATION WITH THE WATER.
21:03:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:04:04 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:04:05 I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT WAS SAID AND MR. MANASSE
21:04:11 INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS THEY ARE PUTTING IN A STORM
21:04:14 DRAIN VAULT THAT THEY'RE CLAIMING AND THAT THE ENGINEERS
21:04:18 CLAIM WILL CAPTURE THE WATER.
21:04:19 IF THIS COUNCIL APPROVES THE PROJECT, ALL I'M TRYING TO
21:04:23 SAY IS WE ARE NOT ENGINEERS.
21:04:27 WE'RE JUST LISTENING TO OUR STAFF, LISTENING TO THE THOSE
21:04:41 INVOLVED.
21:04:41 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
21:04:44 >> AND MR. DINGFELDER -- MR. DINGFELDER IS RIGHT ON ONE
21:04:54 ACCORD.
21:04:54 HE IS RIGHT.
21:04:55 26TH STREET DOES FLOOD.
21:04:57 WHEN IT RAINS, IT RAINS HARD.
21:05:00 AND EVEN THOUGH WE'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING TONIGHT IN
21:05:04 REFERENCE TO THIS ISSUE, THIS PROJECT, THIS PROJECT HAS,
21:05:07 IN CERTAIN RESPECTS, IF WE GO FORWARD AND APPROVE IT AND
21:05:11 IT CONTINUES TO FLOOD OUT THERE, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT
21:05:14 WE LOOK AND SEE OUT THERE AND WHY IT IS FLOOD AND I WANT
21:05:30 YOU TO KNOW THAT IT IS NOT FALLING ON DEAF EARS AND IT
21:05:33 DOES FLOOD.
21:05:34 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:05:35 >> AND, MR. CHAIRMAN, I WANT TO MAKE A COUPLE OF FINAL
21:05:40 COMMENTS HERE.
21:05:41 >> GO AHEAD.
21:05:42 >> WE CAN'T ALLEGE THAT WE'RE MEETING THE STORM RUNOFF
21:05:45 WITH OUR SITE.
21:05:46 IT IS A MATHEMATICAL CALCULATION.
21:05:47 AND IT IS BASED UPON DO WE MEET IT OR DO WE NOT MEET IT?
21:05:54 AND THE STORM WATER DEPARTMENT IS VERY DILIGENT ABOUT
21:05:57 MAKING SURE THAT CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT.
21:06:00 WE CAN DEAL WITH OUR ON-SITE RUNOFF, BUT WE CAN'T DEAL
21:06:04 WITH OFF-SITE CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CONTRIBUTING TO THE
21:06:08 STREET FLOODING THAT HE REFERRED TO, BUT WE CAN DO
21:06:21 EVERYTHING ON OUR SIDE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY
21:06:25 CODE.
21:06:27 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:06:28 YOUR HONOR ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AND ANYONE ELSE
21:06:32 FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? BEING
21:06:34 AND HEARING NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THIS
21:06:39 HEARING, UNLESS THERE'S ANY OBJECTION.
21:06:43 I SEE NO OBJECTION.
21:06:44 I HEAR NO OBJECTION.
21:06:45 I BELIEVE WE GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER IF YOU WILL READ WHAT
21:07:05 IS NEXT.
21:07:05 >> AND THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY 21603 IN THE CITY OF
21:07:10 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
21:07:14 DISTRICT ONE, RF-16 TO THE SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL
21:07:21 DEVELOPMENT AND SINGLE FAMILY AND SEE THE ATTACHED.
21:07:25 >> WE HAVE A SECOND AND A MOTION FROM THE COUNCILMAN AND
21:07:33 THEN A SECOND FROM RIVERA.
21:07:34 >> VIERA?
21:07:37 >> YES.
21:07:38 >> CARLSON? (NO RESPONSE)
21:07:42 >> GUDES? YES.
21:07:45 >> MIRANDA?
21:07:46 >> YES.
21:07:47 >> YES.
21:07:47 >> YES.
21:07:47 >> YES.
21:07:49 >> AND THE MOTION TO CARRY AND THE SECOND READING AND
21:07:52 ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 10th AT 5:01 P.M.
21:07:56 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:07:58 IF I CAN INQUIRE, COUNCILMAN, THAT INCLUDES THE CHANGES
21:08:02 BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READINGS?
21:08:04 >> YES, SIR.
21:08:05 >> OKAY.
21:08:06 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:08:07 ITEM NUMBER NINE WAS ALREADY CONTINUED UNTIL
21:08:14 OCTOBER 22nd.
21:08:16 WE HAVE THREE MORE ITEMS.
21:08:19 LET'S BEGIN WITH NUMBER 10.
21:08:20 >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SWEAR HIM IN?
21:08:24 >> WILL YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:08:26 DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND
21:08:29 NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
21:08:30 >> I DO.
21:08:31 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY HERE.
21:08:34 A REQUEST: IF WE CAN, WHEN WE STARTED -- WHEN WE START
21:08:41 THE HEARING, IT WILL BE A COUPLE OF SECONDS BEFORE WE CAN
21:08:44 PULL THE PETITIONER UP AND HAVE THAT PETITIONER ON
21:08:47 SCREEN.
21:08:47 SO WHEN THE SWEARING-IN OCCURS, YOU'LL HAVE A PETITIONER
21:08:52 ON THE SCREEN AT THE SAME TIME.
21:08:53 IF WE COULD JUST ALLOW THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MR. CREW TO BE
21:08:57 ABLE TO DO THAT TRANSITION, IT WILL TAKE A COUPLE OF
21:09:00 SECONDS, AND I APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH.
21:09:03 THANK YOU.
21:09:05 YOU'VE GOT IT.
21:09:06 ALL RIGHT.
21:09:07 MR. MANASSE?
21:09:08 >> OKAY.
21:09:09 ITEM NUMBER 10 IS RS-22 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF
21:09:14 MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD.
21:09:15 THE CURRENT ZONING IS PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CURRENT
21:09:18 OFFICE, BUSINESS OR PROFESSIONAL.
21:09:20 THEY'RE REQUESTING TO REZONE TO A PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
21:09:23 FOR OFFICE, MEDICAL, BUSINESS, AND PROFESSIONAL.
21:09:26 I'LL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT
21:09:28 AND PLEASE TUNE BACK TO ME AFTERWARDS.
21:10:06 AND 400 IS A MIXED-USE CORRIDOR AND NOW IS IN AN
21:10:13 EVACUATION ZONE.
21:10:14 AND THIS IS THE SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
21:10:17 THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR.
21:10:20 IT IS ON MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD --
21:10:26 IT IS ON NORTH DARTMOUTH AVENUE, WHICH RUNS INTO MLK.
21:10:32 AND YOU WILL SEE ONLY COMMERCIAL USES ON MLK AND YOU WILL
21:10:36 START SEEING RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:10:43 AND IT IS A LAND-USE MAP AND IT IS A COMMUNITY MIXED-USE
21:10:47 35 DESIGNATION AND MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD AND THAT
21:10:53 IS CMU-35 AND IT TRANSITIONS TO A CC-35 AS YOU MOVE EAST
21:11:02 AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THERE ARE COMMERCIAL
21:11:15 USES ALONG MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD AND THERE ARE
21:11:19 SEVERAL OFFICES ALONG MLK.
21:11:36 AND IT GOES WEST OF THE BOULEVARD AND THEN IS WEST OF MLK
21:11:46 AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN.
21:11:48 AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I'LL AVAILABLE FOR
21:11:51 ANY QUESTIONS.
21:11:55 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:11:55 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? WE HAVE NO
21:11:58 QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN.
21:11:59 NEXT, PLEASE.
21:12:00 >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN MANASSE, PLANNING CORPORATION AND
21:12:09 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 208 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING
21:12:13 BOULEVARD.
21:12:14 THEY ARE REQUESTING TO GO FROM THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
21:12:16 OFFICE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
21:12:19 OFFICE AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL AND IT IS WEST OF
21:12:33 DARTMOUTH AVENUE AND THE LOT CONTAINS 10,476 SQUARE FEET
21:12:39 OR .43 ACRES AND THE SITE CONTAINS A EXISTING ONE-STORY
21:12:45 STRUCTURE, WHICH WILL REMAIN.
21:12:47 THE SETBACKS -- THE SOUTH, SIX FEET THE EAST, SEVEN FEET
21:12:52 AND THE WEST, SEVEN FEET.
21:12:53 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE PROPOSED PLAN IS AT
21:12:57 20 FEET.
21:12:57 A TOTAL OF 14 PARKING PLACES ARE BEING REQUIRED AND EIGHT
21:13:01 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
21:13:02 IT IS IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS GENERAL OR THE ZONING
21:13:07 DISTRICTS TO THE NORTH.
21:13:08 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USE TO THE SOUTH IN THE RS-50
21:13:12 ZONING DISTRICT AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO THE EAST ZONED
21:13:15 AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SINGLE-FAMILY USE TO THE
21:13:19 WEST FOR RS-50 ZONING.
21:13:24 AND IT HAS PLANNED MODIFICATIONS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT AS
21:13:35 WELL AS IN YOUR REVISION SHEET.
21:13:37 TRANSPORTATION DID FIND IT INCONSISTENT ON PAGE 3 OF THE
21:13:42 SITE REPORT AS WELL AS THE MODIFICATIONS -- I'M SORRY
21:13:44 THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED IF THE PLAN IS APPROVED TONIGHT.
21:14:05 AND IT IS NOT IN THE RED BUT THE STAFF REPORT IS CORRECT.
21:14:08 I WOULD GO TO THE PICTURES.
21:14:10 IF YOU NEED ME TO THROW UP THAT AERIAL, I WILL.
21:14:14 LET ME DO IT REAL FAST.
21:14:17 THERE WE GO.
21:14:30 AND IT IS TO THE SOUTH OF MLK BOULEVARD AND TO THE SOUTH,
21:14:34 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, RS-50 AND HAVE YOU THE
21:14:47 STRUCTURE AT THE CORNER OF MLK AND DARTMOUTH AND YOU HAVE
21:14:51 ANOTHER ANGLE TO THE RIGHT HERE SHOWING ANOTHER ENTRANCE
21:14:54 TO THE BUILDING.
21:14:55 AND THEN, AGAIN, THE SUBJECT SIDE OF THE CORNER.
21:15:03 AND THE EAST BUILDING AT HIGHLAND WHICH IS THIS BUILDING
21:15:07 AS WELL.
21:15:08 I WAS JUST TRYING TO SHOW THAT YOU ALLEY WAY THAT IS NOT
21:15:13 IMPROVED AS WELL.
21:15:14 AND HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE TOP LEFT OF THE
21:15:17 PICTURE.
21:15:17 THEN THE CLOSEST NEIGHBOR IS THE RS-50 NORTH DARTMOUTH
21:15:22 AND THE LEFT NEIGHBOR IS 3916 NORTH DARTMOUTH WHICH IS
21:15:27 ACROSS THE STREET AND THE PHOTO HERE, WEST ON MLK
21:15:31 BOULEVARD AND THEN MLK BOULEVARD.
21:15:49 AND THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL BUILDINGS AND THAT IS FOR USE
21:15:55 RS-35.
21:15:56 THERE ARE NO VARIANCES ON RECORD OR SPECIAL-USE
21:15:59 APPLICATIONS AN THE CURRENT ZONING IS 2004-75 3475-30402
21:16:05 OR THE OFFICE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL USE AND IN
21:16:09 VIOLATION OF COD 19-0000-400 FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICE FOR
21:16:14 THE PERMITTED USE ON THE PROPERTY.
21:16:16 AGAIN, AFTER PAGE 10 IS THE REVISION SHEET THAT WOULD BE
21:16:21 REQUIRED BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND SHOULD
21:16:22 YOU ADOPT THIS SITE PLAN AND, AGAIN, THE DEVELOPMENT AND
21:16:25 COMPLIANCE STAFF DID REVIEW THE APPLICATION.
21:16:28 AND WE FOUND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
21:16:31 DEVELOPMENT CODES AND THE REFERENCE FINDING BY THE
21:16:34 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE
21:16:43 OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SHOW WHAT IS LISTED IN THE REPORT,
21:16:48 AND THE MODIFICATIONS BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND
21:16:50 READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND THE STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR
21:16:53 ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
21:16:58 >> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? ANY STAFF
21:17:03 QUESTIONS.
21:17:06 ALL RIGHT.
21:17:07 NEXT UP, MR. SHELBY?
21:17:09 >> MR. SHELBY: MR. SHELBY KNOWS WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR SO
21:17:14 I'LL TURN IT OVER TO HIM.
21:17:15 >> HI.
21:17:16 MY NAME IS MARK BENTLEY, TAMPA, 33602 AND WE WAIVE THE
21:17:22 PROVISION UNDER THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE AND LIKEWISE, THE
21:17:26 FLORIDA STATUTES.
21:17:33 >> ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:17:34 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
21:17:36 MY NAME IS MARK BENTLEY.
21:17:38 I JUST GAVE MY ADDRESS AND WHAT HE PRESENTED IS PRETTY
21:17:43 COMPREHENSIVE.
21:17:44 SO TAKE A QUICK LOOK AND GO AHEAD.
21:18:09 GO TO THE NEXT PHOTO PLEASE.
21:18:13 THIS IS REALLY THE LINCHPIN OF THE CASE HERE.
21:18:15 IT IS THE PARKING ISSUE.
21:18:16 RIGHT NOW IT'S APPROVED FOR EIGHT SPACES AND GO AHEAD.
21:18:36 CAN WE TAKE THAT DOWN, PLEASE? OKAY.
21:18:39 SO THE REQUEST IS FROM PD, WHICH WAS APPROVED IN 2004
21:18:46 UNDER ORDINANCE 2004-75 TO ALLOW FOR PD MEDICAL OFFICE.
21:18:53 IT'S GOT AN INTERESTING SITUATION.
21:18:56 THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED AND CONSTRUCTED IN 2005.
21:18:58 IT'S BEEN UTILIZED AS A MEDICAL OFFICE BY OUR CLIENTS IN
21:19:03 2005.
21:19:05 SO FOR 15 YEARS, WHICH IS PRETTY INTERESTING, THE
21:19:09 ORDINANCE ON ITS FACE SAID IT IS APPROVED FOR
21:19:12 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, BUT THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED
21:19:15 BY COUNCIL AND CERTIFIED SAYS APPROVED FOR OFFICE AND
21:19:25 COMMERCIAL.
21:19:26 SO THERE IS A DIFFERENT PARKING RATIO, AS I MESSENGERED
21:19:29 IN THE OTHER CASE FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICE.
21:19:32 IT'S 3.2 FOR PROFESSIONAL AND SIX FOR MEDICAL AND THEY
21:19:38 HAVE EIGHT SPACES.
21:19:40 THEY'VE DEMONSTRATED HISTORICALLY THEY CAN FUNCTION WITH
21:19:42 EIGHT SPACE SPACES WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM WHATSOEVER.
21:19:51 AND THIS CAME UP SOMEHOW, AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING
21:19:52 DILIGENTLY SINCE THE CLIENT WAS CITED TO GET THIS
21:19:57 RESOLVED.
21:20:03 AND IN 2005, WHEN THE PROJECT WAS BEING BUILT AND THIS
21:20:13 DRIVEWAY HAS A PERMIT FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
21:20:17 TRANSPORTATION.
21:20:17 WHAT HAPPENED IS THEIR REPRESENTATIVE APPROACHED THE CITY
21:20:19 AND, AT THAT POINT IN TIME, IT WAS KIT ALEXANDER WORKING
21:20:31 FOR THE CITY AND SHE HAD SIGNED OFF ON MEDICAL OFFICE FOR
21:20:31 THE PROPERTY, SO THIS THING IS ESCALATING AND THERE WAS
21:20:34 SOME CONFUSION THERE.
21:20:35 AND I THINK I SENT THIS TO RYAN AND SHAWN.
21:20:40 AND THERE'S BEEN SOME CONFUSION HERE.
21:20:42 AND NO ONE WAS TRYING TO HIDE THE BALL AND THEY THOUGHT
21:20:45 UNDER THE GUISE OF THE OFFICE THAT YOU COULD HAVE THIS
21:20:49 AND BECAUSE THE SITE SUGGESTED THIS AND ALSO THE DOT
21:20:53 PERMIT.
21:20:53 I TALKS ABOUT SOME OF THAT BUT, LIKE I SAID, WITH THE AD
21:21:04 VENT OF THE SHARE, WE'RE PROVIDING A RACK AND WHEN THIS
21:21:31 CAME THROUGH CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE SAME WAIVERS THAT
21:21:34 I'M APPROVING TONIGHT FOR COUNCIL, BUT FOR THE PARKING
21:21:37 ISSUE, OKAY? SO ON JUNE 17th, 2020, I WROTE THE LETTER
21:21:48 TO LACHONE DOCK.
21:21:54 AND I DON'T KNOW HER TITLE, IF IT'S PLANNING DEVELOPMENT
21:21:54 AND SAID, SINCE NOTHING IS CHANGING ON THE SITE, COUNCIL
21:21:54 APPROVED THE PLAN FOR THE WAIVERS. THEN ON THE SAME DAY
21:21:54 SHE SAYS,
21:22:07 "MARK, YOU ARE CORRECT.
21:22:14 THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL OF THIS
21:22:17 REQUEST IS THE PLACEMENT OF SOLID WASTE, WHICH IS NOW
21:22:20 LOCATED TO THE SOUTH.
21:22:21 RYAN WILL ANNOUNCE DURING HIS PRESENTATION THERE IS AN
21:22:24 ERROR FROM THE STAFF'S PART AND PUT ON THE RECORD, YOU
21:22:28 ARE NOT REQUIRING A WAIVER TO THE STREET, ET CETERA, ET
21:22:31 CETERA.
21:22:32 HAVE A GOOD DAY, LACHONE.
21:22:35 WHAT THIS CASE BOILS DOWN TO -- NOTHING IS CHANGING.
21:22:41 THE BUFFER HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THIS HAS BEEN THERE FOR
21:22:44 YEARS.
21:22:44 WHEN YOU BOIL IT DOWN, IT IS REALLY A WAIVER FROM 14
21:22:47 SPACES TO EIGHT, WHICH HISTORICALLY HAS WORKED FOR THIS
21:22:50 FACILITY.
21:22:51 IS THIS WARRANTED OR JUSTIFIED? AND OUR POSITION IS
21:22:54 HISTORICALLY, IT HAS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY.
21:22:57 WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY COMPLAINTS FROM NEIGHBORS.
21:22:59 I NOTIFIED 10 ASSOCIATIONS ON THIS CASE, TOO AND,
21:23:03 PERSONALLY, I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY FEEDBACK WHATSOEVER,
21:23:06 SO, YOUR HONOR, I REST MY CASE.
21:23:14 >> YOUR HONOR? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:23:18 "YOUR HONOR"? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
21:23:23 MEMBERS? ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? OKAY.
21:23:25 IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? THIS
21:23:30 IS ITEM 10, REZ-22.
21:23:46 >> THERE IS NO ONE IN THE PUBLIC.
21:23:47 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:23:48 ALL RIGHT.
21:23:48 (BACKGROUND INTERFERENCE)
21:23:49 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM ANYONE? SEEING AND
21:23:52 HEARING NONE IF WE COULD MUTE THE CONVENTION CENTER MIC,
21:24:05 THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF A SIREN THERE.
21:24:07 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:24:08 I WOULD MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING, UNLESS THERE'S
21:24:10 ANY OBJECTION.
21:24:11 NO OBJECTION? ALL RIGHT.
21:24:12 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:24:17 WHERE DID WE LEAVE OFF WITH THE SECOND PERSON TO READ?
21:24:20 YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE ANY MOTIONS; CORRECT?
21:24:24 ALL RIGHT.
21:24:24 COUNCILMAN VIERA, IF YOU WOULD MIND TAKING ITEM 10.
21:24:34 >> I DO NOT MIND.
21:24:35 I HEREBY MOVE FOR REZ-20-22, I MOVE A SUBSTITUTE
21:24:40 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING AND
21:24:40 CONSIDERATION, REZONING THE PROPERTY OF 208 WEST MARTIN
21:24:45 LUTHER KING BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
21:24:49 FROM DISTRICT ONE FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS
21:24:52 OFFICE AND BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL PD MEDICAL OFFICE AND
21:24:56 BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:25:00 >> SECOND.
21:25:00 >> ALL RIGHT.
21:25:01 WE HAVE A MOTION.
21:25:02 NOW, COUNCILMAN VIERA, IS THAT THE SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE;
21:25:06 CORRECT?
21:25:07 >> COUNCILMAN VIERA: YES.
21:25:11 THAT'S CORRECT.
21:25:12 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:25:13 WE HAVE A MOTION FROM THE COUNCILMAN AND A SECOND.
21:25:16 IF I COULD HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
21:25:17 >> YES.
21:25:17 >> YES.
21:25:18 >> DINGFELDER?
21:25:22 >> YES.
21:25:23 >> CARLSON? (NO RESPONSE)
21:25:23 >> GUDES?
21:25:23 >> YES.
21:25:23 >> YES.
21:25:37 >> YES.
21:25:38 >> AND ADOPTED.
21:25:40 AND IT WILL BE MOVED.
21:25:44 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:25:44 AND ITEM NUMBER 11, WE CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBER 8th.
21:25:49 ITEM NUMBER 12 -- ITEM NUMBER 12 CANNOT BE HEARD.
21:25:54 WE GO TO ITEM 13 IF WE CAN BEGIN WITH THAT ONE, PLEASE.
21:25:59 THEN THERE IS ONE MORE AND WE COMPLETE THE AGENDA.
21:26:07 IS.
21:26:07 >> AND REZ-19-62.
21:26:12 THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND READY TO BE SWORN IN.
21:26:15 >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:26:17 DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND
21:26:19 NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
21:26:20 >> I DO.
21:26:21 >> THANK YOU.
21:26:23 MARY SANTIAGO.
21:26:25 IT IS FOR REZ19-62.
21:26:29 IT IS FOR PROPERTY AT 2602 THROUGH 2608 WEST AZEELE
21:26:34 AVENUE AND 404 SOUTH AUDUBON AVENUE FROM PD TO PD.
21:26:41 I DEFER TO DANNY COLLINS FROM THE COMMISSION.
21:26:49 >> DANNY COLLINS: MY NAME IS DANNY COLLINS. PLANNING
21:26:53 COMMISSION STAFF.
21:26:53 I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:26:54 THIS IS SPECIFICALLY A PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD AND PUBLIC
21:26:56 RECREATION FACILITY, WHICH IS HYDE PARK, WHICH IS LOCATED
21:26:59 WITHIN 3,000 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:27:04 THE CENTER IS LOCATED IN PROXIMITY TO THE TRANSIT AND
21:27:08 THAT IS IN A LEVEL C, THE EVACUATION ZONE. (AUDIO
21:27:15 DISTORTION)
21:27:16 AND THE AREA OF THAT TO THE SUBJECT SITE AND IT IS TO
21:27:34 WEST AUDUBON TO THE WEST AND WEST-- AND WEST AZEELE
21:27:53 STREET AND IT IS LAND USE MAP (AUDIO CUTTING OUT) ON BOTH
21:27:57 SIDES AND TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, THERE IS C-35
21:28:02 AND THEN C-35 A COUPLE OF BLOCKS FROM THE PLANNING SITE
21:28:07 AND IT IS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THE PORTION OF WEST
21:28:12 AZEELE STREET CONTAINS OFFICE AND SOME COMMERCIAL,
21:28:16 RESIDENTIAL USE.
21:28:18 AND WOULD REQUEST BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND UNIT THE
21:28:21 PEDESTRIAN WOULD PROVIDE A PATH BETWEEN THE MAIN ENTRANCE
21:28:24 OF THE OFFICE AND THE SIDEWALK ON WEST AZEELE STREET AND
21:28:29 COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND
21:28:36 IT IS IN WITH REFERENCE TO THE POLICY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
21:28:40 AND THE PLAN.
21:28:41 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING STAFF HAS
21:28:49 THAT IS WHICH CONSISTS OF THAT USE.
21:28:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:28:47 ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS?
21:28:49 ANY QUESTIONS?
21:28:51 NO?
21:28:51 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:28:52 NEXT, PLEASE?
21:28:54 NEXT SPEAKER.
21:28:54 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: CAN YOU PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?
21:28:59 THANK YOU.
21:29:01 AS I STATED, THIS IS REZ 19-62, A REZONING REQUEST FROM
21:29:05 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
21:29:07 THEY ARE PROPOSING SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL AND
21:29:10 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
21:29:15 THE DESIGN REVIEW COMPLIANCE STAFF DID FIND THIS
21:29:17 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND USE DEVELOPMENT
21:29:21 REGULATIONS, AND THERE ARE SOME CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND
21:29:24 SECOND READING FOUND IN YOUR REVISION SHEET.
21:29:27 THERE ARE TWO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
21:29:28 ONE TO REMOVE ONE NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREE IN SECTION
21:29:34 13-45, THE ANALYSIS OF THAT TREE IS FOUND IN YOUR STAFF
21:29:37 REPORT FOR YOUR REVIEW, CITY COUNCIL.
21:29:40 AND THE OTHER ONE IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED USE BUFFER TO
21:29:43 THE SOUTH FROM 15 FEET TO THE 6-FOOT CMU WALL TO 5 FEET
21:29:48 WITH A 6-FOOT PVC FENCE.
21:29:51 THIS SITE PLAN -- OOPS.
21:29:55 SORRY.
21:29:56 HERE IS THE SITE PLAN THAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
21:30:00 I WILL STATE, CITY COUNCIL, THAT THE STAFF IS WORKING
21:30:02 WITH THE APPLICANT FOR WELL OVER A YEAR ON THIS SITE, AND
21:30:06 THIS IS THE THIRD ITERATION OF THE SITE PLAN THAT HAS
21:30:09 BEEN PROPOSED, AND IT'S BEFORE YOU FOR RECOMMENDATION.
21:30:14 AGAIN, THERE ARE SIX ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS ON THE
21:30:20 WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AND NOW ON THE EASTERN
21:30:24 SIDE, AND THEN THEY ARE PROPOSING THE MIDDLE BUILDING,
21:30:33 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE OF 4,800 SQUARE FEET.
21:30:38 BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF USES, ALL REQUIRED PARKING
21:30:43 HAS BEEN -- THE PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY OCCUPIED, ONE PD
21:30:56 DIFFERENT USES.
21:30:57 THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
21:31:00 AGAIN, THERE IS DIFFERENT RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE
21:31:05 PROFESSIONAL USES ON THE PROPERTY NOW.
21:31:10 THE PROPOSAL WITH THE APPLICANT IS TO BRING THE ENTIRE
21:31:13 SITE UNDER ONE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT.
21:31:17 INDICATED ON YOUR SCREEN NOW.
21:31:20 THERE ARE SOME CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING
21:31:23 FROM THE PLANNING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
21:31:25 DEPARTMENT, SMALL MODIFICATIONS.
21:31:27 WE DID FIND IT CONSISTENT.
21:31:28 NATURAL RESOURCES DID FIND IT CONSISTENT.
21:31:31 THEY ALSO HAVE SOME MINOR CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND
21:31:35 SECOND READING.
21:31:36 AGAIN, AS I STATED, THE NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREE
21:31:41 EVALUATION IS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT FOR YOUR REVIEW.
21:31:44 SOLID WASTE HAD MINOR CHANGES AS WELL AS STORMWATER.
21:31:49 SAYING THAT OVERALL THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE
21:31:51 STAFF DID FIND IT CONSISTENT AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY
21:31:54 QUESTIONS.
21:31:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANY
21:31:58 BOARD MEMBERS AT THIS TIME?
21:32:08 NO?
21:32:08 SEEING AND HEARING NONE.
21:32:09 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI, YOU WAIVE THE 180 DAYS?
21:32:20 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
21:32:21 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN AND I WAIVE THE 180 DAYS.
21:32:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MICHELINI, GO AHEAD.
21:32:27 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS IS A REZONING THAT WAS
21:32:29 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR 20 TOWNHOUSE UNITS.
21:32:32 AND SO IT'S A TEN-UNIT REDUCTION.
21:32:36 BUT IT ALSO ADDS A BUSINESS OFFICE COMPONENT THAT
21:32:39 PREVIOUSLY WAS NOT THERE.
21:32:41 SO IT HAS A UNIQUE POSITION IN THAT IT'S COMBINING
21:32:46 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS.
21:32:50 WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 39 PARKING SPACES AND WE ARE
21:32:54 PROVIDING 59 WHICH IS ALSO ANOTHER UNIQUE POSITION TO BE
21:32:58 IN.
21:32:58 USUALLY IT'S THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
21:33:00 AND WE ARE HAPPY TO BE PROVIDING 20 MORE SPACES THAN WE
21:33:03 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE.
21:33:05 IT DOES INTEGRATE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF LAND USES, AND
21:33:10 ALL OF THE UNITS, THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACE
21:33:15 RIGHTS-OF-WAY, FOUR OF THEM FACE TAMPANIA AND SIX OF THEM
21:33:19 FACE -- [RUSTLING PAPERS]
21:33:26 THE INDIVIDUAL GARAGES ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH UNIT.
21:33:30 THERE'S TWO ENCLOSED FOR EACH UNIT, AND TWO ADDITIONAL
21:33:34 SPACES ON THE APRON PLUS WE HAVE A COVERED GARAGE IN THE
21:33:40 CENTRAL PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
21:33:42 THIS WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS.
21:33:46 THIS IS A UNIQUE COMBINATION OF LAND USES AND INTEGRATION
21:33:50 OF USES WHERE YOU HAVE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AS WELL AS
21:33:54 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THE SAME SITE.
21:34:00 THE PROJECT IS IN HARMONY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AS I
21:34:03 SAID.
21:34:03 WE HAVE A NUMBER OF UNITS FROM 20 TO 10.
21:34:08 WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION, AND THE
21:34:15 OFFICE IS 6,400 SQUARE FEET.
21:34:17 AND THEN IT'S 39,000 SQUARE FEET FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE
21:34:22 PROPERTY.
21:34:24 THE AREA IS CHARACTERIZED BY A MIX OF USES FOR
21:34:28 TOWNHOUSES, COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, SCHOOLS,
21:34:34 AND VARIETY OF OTHER TYPES OF USES.
21:34:38 SO OUR ENTRANCES ARE FROM AZEELE EXCEPT FOR THE
21:34:43 INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
21:34:45 BUT THE INTERIOR UNITS ARE ALL COMING IN AND OFF OF
21:34:50 AZEELE WHICH WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE BUSINESS USE.
21:34:56 WE DO HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS.
21:34:58 WE ARE REDUCING A NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
21:35:00 WE ARE COMBINING THEM WITH A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE UNIT.
21:35:05 AND THIS DOES SHOW FLEXIBILITY AND MULTI-USE FOR SINGLE
21:35:12 SITE.
21:35:14 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION EXCEPT I'M GUESSING THAT
21:35:17 YOU WANT A COMMITMENT THAT WE ARE GOING TO MEET THE
21:35:19 STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
21:35:22 TAMPA STANDARDS, AND WE WILL DO THAT.
21:35:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:35:28 THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MICHELINI?
21:35:31 ANY QUESTIONS?
21:35:34 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:35:35 IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON
21:35:37 THIS ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 13?
21:35:40 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC?
21:35:42 >> YES, WE DO HAVE A RESIDENT.
21:35:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
21:35:55 THE RESIDENT, PLEASE STATE THAT YOU ARE NAME FOR THE
21:35:58 RECORD.
21:35:59 >> MY NAME IS REBECCA FAST, AND WE ARE OPPOSING THAT I
21:36:08 WANTED TO KEEP THE PROPERTY OWNED THE WAY IT IS, AND
21:36:13 WANTED THE ZONING TO BE A COMMUNITY CENTER IT'S ALREADY
21:36:19 ZONED AS A CENTER AS WELL,
21:36:30 AND WE ARE ALSO WANTING TO ASK IN REFERENCE TO THE
21:36:36 REQUEST, AND WE HAVE SOME THAT ARE ON THE SITE AS WELL AS
21:36:44 MIGRATING BIRDS, AND GRAND OAKS, AND THE FACT THAT THIS
21:36:55 PROPERTY IS -- AND WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS AREA AS A
21:37:07 BEAUTIFICATION AND A GREEN ZONE AREA, AND THE FACT THAT
21:37:12 IT IS ON A HILL AND IT MAKES THAT TRANSITION FROM HYDE
21:37:18 PARK ALL THE WAY INTO DOWNTOWN.
21:37:20 IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC AREA THAT MANY PEOPLE PASS ON A
21:37:25 DAILY BASIS AND WE JUST FEEL LIKE THIS PROPERTY IS THE
21:37:32 WAY THAT IT IS INDICATED FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA TO SHOW
21:37:37 AND BEAUTIFY AND BRING FORWARD OUR BEST.
21:37:41 WE DON'T FEEL LIKE TOWNHOUSES ARE THE BEST, AS WELL AS
21:37:45 BEING ABLE TO SAVE THE TREES, AND HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO
21:37:49 FIND ANY NATURAL RESOURCES REPORT, AND WE WOULD ALSO LIKE
21:37:52 TO SEE THE REVISED PLAN BECAUSE WE HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE
21:37:56 TO SEE THAT.
21:38:00 IT'S IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE
21:38:03 REALLY REQUEST FOR YOU TO DENY THE USE CHANGE AT THIS
21:38:07 TIME FOR 19-62.
21:38:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:38:13 ARE THERE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS OR IS THAT THE ONLY SPEAKER?
21:38:16 >> THAT IS THE ONLY SPEAKER.
21:38:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:38:26 ALL RIGHT.
21:38:27 ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
21:38:33 NO?
21:38:34 ALL RIGHT.
21:38:34 I AM GOING TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THERE'S
21:38:36 ANY OBJECTION.
21:38:37 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, DO YOU WANT A RESPONSE FROM ME?
21:38:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE REBUTTAL, SIR?
21:38:45 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I THINK THAT THEY ARE CONFUSED WHAT
21:38:49 THE EXISTING ZONING IS BECAUSE THE EXISTING ZONING IS FOR
21:38:52 20 TOWNHOUSE USES WHICH WE ARE CHANGING AND I AM NOT
21:38:56 AWARE OF A HEALTH CENTER THAT'S BEING PROPOSED THERE.
21:39:01 AND THE CONDITION OF THE TREE TO BE REMOVED IS INDICATED
21:39:05 BY NATURAL RESOURCES BEING C-8 AND NOT LIKELY TO HAVE
21:39:09 MUCH OF A LIFE SPAN REMAINING.
21:39:13 I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF YOUR SUPPORT FOR THIS
21:39:17 PROJECT.
21:39:17 THANK YOU.
21:39:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
21:39:22 I AM GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
21:39:24 UNLESS THERE'S ANY OBJECTIONS.
21:39:25 SEEING AND HEARING NONE, ALL RIGHT.
21:39:32 WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
21:39:36 THE LAST PERSON TO READ WAS -- WHO WOULD LIKE TO TAKE
21:39:42 THIS?
21:39:43 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:39:44 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
21:39:49 AND FILE NUMBER REZ-19-62.
21:39:56 SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
21:39:58 CONSIDERATION.
21:39:59 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL ADVICE
21:40:01 INTERESTS OF 2602, 2604, 2608 WEST AZEELE STREET AND 404
21:40:09 SOUTH AUDUBON AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
21:40:13 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
21:40:17 DISTRICT PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CATERING SHOP, BED AND
21:40:21 BREAKFAST, CHURCH, CLUB, DAYCARE, OFFICE-MEDICAL AND
21:40:26 PROFESSIONAL, PERSONAL SERVICES, PHARMACY, RESTAURANT,
21:40:30 RETAIL, CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SPECIALTY GADS TO PD,
21:40:36 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
21:40:39 AND BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
21:40:42 DATE.
21:40:44 AND THAT THE PETITIONER HAS MET THE BURDEN OF
21:40:46 PARAGRAPH -- EXCUSE ME, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
21:40:52 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND
21:40:56 THAT THE WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
21:40:59 27-149.4 SUCH AS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND
21:41:07 THEREFORE IN NEED OF WAIVERS.
21:41:08 I'M ALSO ASKING THAT THE WAIVERS BE SUBMITTED AND THAT
21:41:14 THERE BE REDESIGNED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
21:41:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:41:19 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
21:41:21 >> SECOND.
21:41:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
21:41:24 ROLL CALL VOTE.
21:41:24 >>LUIS VIERA: YES GOOD GOOD YES.
21:41:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:41:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:41:34 >>BILL CARLSON: (NO RESPONSE).
21:41:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:41:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:41:41 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
21:41:44 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 10
21:41:47 AT 5:01 P.M.
21:41:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:41:53 COUNCIL.
21:41:57 >> HAVE A GOOD EVENING.
21:41:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOW THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA,
21:42:00 ITEM NUMBER 14.
21:42:01 >> ITEM 14 IS REZ 20-14.
21:42:08 THE APPLICANTS ARE PRESENT.
21:42:10 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:42:11 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE
21:42:13 WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
21:42:15 >> YES.
21:42:17 >> THANK YOU.
21:42:18 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: PLANNING, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
21:42:21 COORDINATION. THIS IS REZ 20-14.
21:42:23 THE REZONING REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2705
21:42:28 NORTH BOULEVARD FROM RM-16 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
21:42:33 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, RESIDENTIAL WITH DENSITY BONUS
21:42:37 PROVISION, PLANNING COMMISSION DANNY COLLINS, PLEASE.
21:42:41 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING
21:42:47 COMMISSION STAFF.
21:42:48 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:42:50 BEFORE WE GET STARTED, I WANT TO MAKE A CORRECTION FOR
21:42:52 THE RECORD.
21:42:54 PAGE 5 OF THE STAFF REPORT, ANALYSIS INCORRECTLY STATES
21:43:00 POLICY 9.1.1 FOR URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS MAINTAIN A
21:43:07 CONSISTENT OVERALL SETBACK FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
21:43:14 AND SIDEWALK UNDER LAND USE POLICY 9.1 -- 9.2.2.
21:43:21 IT SHOULD BE 9.1.1.
21:43:26 THE FINAL CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE
21:43:28 SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA VILLAGE.
21:43:34 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS ROBLES PARK
21:43:37 LOCATED WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:43:40 SUBJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TRANSIT, THE CLOSEST
21:43:44 STOP NORTH BOULEVARD.
21:43:46 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITH C EVACUATION ZONE.
21:43:50 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:43:57 OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR.[~DISTORTION~] THIS IS
21:44:05 NORTH AVENUE.
21:44:08 AND THERE'S USES ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD, AND NORTH OF THE
21:44:13 SUBJECT SITE.
21:44:15 THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:44:19 IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE
21:44:21 DESIGNATION WHICH ALLOWS 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE,
21:44:27 SURROUNDED BY THE REZ 20 TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT
21:44:32 SITE.
21:44:34 ON THE SUBJECT SITE, IT'S RESIDENTIAL 10.
21:44:38 REPRESENTED IN THE ORANGE COLOR, ON THE PINK COLOR
21:44:41 REPRESENTS CMU-35.
21:44:43 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATES THAT THIS DESIGN
21:44:47 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT.
21:44:49 IT ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DEVELOPMENTS TO BE
21:44:52 DESIGNED FOR ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR TOWARDS THE
21:44:55 NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK OR STREET.
21:44:57 WHILE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN MEETS THE POLICY DIRECTION
21:45:01 AND ORIENTATION OF THE FOUR UNITS, FOUR UNITS FACING
21:45:08 NORTH BOULEVARD SIDEWALK AND PARKING LOTS.
21:45:12 A SAFETY CONCERN BY FORCING THOSE RESIDENTS TO WALK INTO
21:45:15 THE DRIVEWAY TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
21:45:17 THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH PUBLIC POLICY OF
21:45:22 NEIGHBORHOODS, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ORDER TO
21:45:26 CREATE A DEFINITION OF SIDEWALK AND STREET.
21:45:30 LAND USE POLICY 9.1.1.
21:45:32 A VISUAL REVIEW OF THE SURROUNDING AREA EXISTING
21:45:36 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD SETBACK AND
21:45:39 SIDEWALK.
21:45:40 THESE DEVELOPMENTS FROM THE SIDEWALK WITHOUT PARKING LOTS
21:45:44 OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION.
21:45:46 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONCURS WITH THE APPLICANT THAT
21:45:48 THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN TO ENGAGE THE PUBLIC AND
21:45:53 ASKING FOR A SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD, AND ENSURE
21:45:57 COMPATIBILITY OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:46:00 BATHED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
21:46:02 STAFF FIND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
21:46:04 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:46:09 THAT'S ALL FOR ME AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:46:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
21:46:13 GENTLEMAN?
21:46:16 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:46:17 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
21:46:18 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: IF YOU COULD SHOW MY SCREEN.
21:46:25 AGAIN, THIS IS REZ 20-14, THE PROPERTY AT 2705 NORTH
21:46:31 BOULEVARD FROM RM-16 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
21:46:35 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED WITH BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT
21:46:39 DENSITY PROVISIONS.
21:46:45 STAFF DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
21:46:47 CODE OF ORDINANCES.
21:46:48 THERE ARE SOME REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
21:46:51 READING.
21:46:51 AGAIN, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
21:46:55 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
21:46:56 THERE IS ONE WAIVER BEING REQUESTED TO ALLOW ONE REQUIRED
21:47:00 PARKING SPACE TO BE ENCLOSED IN LIEU TWO REQUIRED PARKING
21:47:04 SPACES TO BE ENCLOSED.
21:47:06 PER SECTION 27-289 -- I'M SORRY, 282.9-C.
21:47:12 HERE IS THE LAYOUT OF THE PROPOSAL.
21:47:16 THERE IS A TOTAL OF 8 DWELLING UNITS, FOUR TO THE NORTH
21:47:19 AND FOUR TO THE SOUTH, TWO STRUCTURES.
21:47:26 THE GARAGES AND PARKING EAST OF THE DWELLING UNITS, A
21:47:29 TOTAL OF 18 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, AND ARE BEING
21:47:33 PROVIDED THROUGH A COMBINATION OF STRUCTURED PARKING IN
21:47:38 CERTAIN PARKING LOTS.
21:47:42 FRONT DOORS DO FACE THE NORTHERN FOUR UNITS.
21:47:44 THE FRONT DOORS AS INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN.
21:47:48 IN THESE LOCATIONS, NORTH BOULEVARD, AND THEN FOR THE
21:47:52 SOUTHERN FOUR UNITS, THERE ARE FRONT DOORS FACING WEST
21:47:56 EUCLID AVENUE.
21:47:57 SO THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT PROVISION OF THE
21:47:59 CODE.
21:48:00 SAYING THAT, THERE ARE SOME MODIFICATIONS BETWEEN FIRST
21:48:03 AND SECOND READING FROM PLANNING, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
21:48:06 COORDINATION THAT ARE LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
21:48:09 NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND IT SIGNIFICANT.
21:48:11 AGAIN WITH SOME MINOR CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
21:48:14 READING.
21:48:15 TRANSPORTATION HAS A COMMENT REGARDING A DEED FILED FOR
21:48:21 THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS ON EUCLID.
21:48:27 AND OTHER THAN THAT, OVERALL, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND
21:48:33 COMPLIANCE STAFF DID FIND IT CONSISTENT.
21:48:34 THERE ARE SOME BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT ARE PROPOSED
21:48:37 INDICATING FRONT DOOR ELEVATIONS, RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
21:48:41 REQUIRED.
21:48:43 HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN RED.
21:48:45 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS A MIX OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
21:48:49 USES WITH SOME OLDER ESTABLISHED SINGLE-FAMILY
21:48:53 RESIDENTIAL IN THE BROADER AREA.
21:48:58 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
21:49:00 AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
21:49:05 >> COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
21:49:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:49:08 I'M NOT SURE WHERE TO DIRECT THIS, PERHAPS TO BOTH DANNY,
21:49:14 YOU AND MARY BOTH.
21:49:17 MARY, YOU MADE REFERENCE TO THE BONUS DENSITY, AND DANNY,
21:49:23 ON YOUR STAFF REPORT, YOU MADE REFERENCE, AND READING
21:49:30 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, IT SAYS THE
21:49:32 SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED A MAXIMUM OF 8 POTENTIAL
21:49:35 RESIDENTIAL UNITS BASED ON THE DENSITY AND DENSITY
21:49:39 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDING 7
21:49:43 UNITS WILL BE SUBJECT TO BONUS PROVISIONS.
21:49:48 AND THAT'S THE LAST I HEARD OF IT.
21:49:52 MARY, YOU MADE QUICK REFERENCE TO IT, BUT WHAT ARE THE
21:49:58 BONUS PROVISIONS THAT ARE BEING REFERENCED HERE?
21:50:01 WHAT DO THEY HAVE TO SUPPLY THE COMMUNITY IN ORDER TO GET
21:50:06 THAT ADDITIONAL UNIT, ET CETERA?
21:50:09 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: THANK YOU, MR. DINGFELDER.
21:50:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF LEGAL WANTS TO CHIME IN, I'M ALL
21:50:18 EARS ON THAT, TOO.
21:50:19 >> CATE WELLS, CHIEF ASSISTANT ATTORNEY FOR THE RECORD.
21:50:27 THE APPLICANT HAS ENTERED INTO A BONUS PROVISION
21:50:30 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY WHICH PROVIDES FOR PAYMENT JUST
21:50:35 ABOUT $27,000, AND PROPOSING FOR THAT AMOUNT TO GO TO A
21:50:41 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PR 1-00-121, WHICH WOULD
21:50:47 PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT ON EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE FROM
21:50:53 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE TO 14th STREET.
21:50:56 I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE DESCRIPTION ABOUT CAPITAL
21:50:59 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THAT.
21:51:00 I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT DOES.
21:51:03 WHAT THEY PROPOSE TO THE CITY IN SUPPORT OF THE UNCREASED
21:51:06 DENSITY.
21:51:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
21:51:09 AND DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW FAR AWAY THAT AGREEMENT IS FROM
21:51:17 THIS LIGHT?
21:51:17 >> FROM TRANSPORTATION IS AVAILABLE.
21:51:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NEBRASKA?
21:51:32 >> EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE TO 14th STREET.
21:51:37 FROM COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:51:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
21:51:42 THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW.
21:51:43 >> JONATHAN SCOTT, TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING
21:51:48 DEPARTMENT.
21:51:48 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:51:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:51:49 >> WHAT EXACTLY DID YOU WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THIS?
21:52:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I CAN PICTURE COLUMBUS.
21:52:05 I THOUGHT WE ALREADY MADE ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG
21:52:08 THERE.
21:52:08 WHAT'S THE CAPITAL PROGRAM ALONG THAT SECTION OF COLUMBUS
21:52:16 THAT WE ARE REFERRING TO?
21:52:17 >> I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THAT
21:52:21 AREA RIGHT NOW.
21:52:22 I HAVE TO CHECK INTO THAT.
21:52:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEY SAID THAT THEY ARE CONTRIBUTING
21:52:30 TO A SPECIFIC CIP AS PART OF THE BONUS CONTRIBUTION.
21:52:35 I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHAT PROJECT WE HAVE GOING IN THERE.
21:52:45 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT.
21:52:46 >>CATE WELLS: IN THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT JUST
21:52:54 MENTIONED, PR 100121, IT SAYS PROVIDES FOR
21:52:58 RECONFIGURATION, THAT THE EXISTING TWO-LANE UNDIVIDED
21:53:02 ROADWAY AND PARKING AISLE BASED ON THE GEOMETRICS OF THE
21:53:08 ROADWAY PATTERNS, SUBSCRIPTION BEING PROPOSED ON THAT
21:53:14 PORTION OF COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:53:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.
21:53:22 I WILL JUST ASK ONE MORE GENERIC QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:53:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
21:53:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT LOOKS LIKE MR. SCOTT -- MAYBE
21:53:35 PUSHED OFF OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
21:53:39 WHAT IF THAT PROJECT NEVER HAPPENS FOR WHATEVER REASON?
21:53:42 WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THOSE FUNDS HELD BY THE CITY IN
21:53:47 TRUST, OR ARE THEY HELD BY THE DEVELOPER UNTIL THE CITY
21:53:50 IS READY FOR THEM?
21:53:52 WHAT HAPPENS WITH THAT MONEY?
21:53:55 >>CATE WELLS: IT WOULD PROBABLY BE USED FOR ANOTHER
21:53:56 SIMILAR PROJECT WITHIN THE SAME MULTIMODAL DISTRICT.
21:54:03 BUT IT WOULD BE PAID BY THE DEVELOPER AND THEN WE THE
21:54:05 CITY WOULD USE THEM FOR ANOTHER SIMILAR PROJECT WITHIN
21:54:08 THE AREA.
21:54:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO ONCE THEY PULL THE PERMITS, WE GET
21:54:11 THE MONEY, AND WE DO THE BEST WE CAN WITH THE CIP, EITHER
21:54:15 THAT CIP OR SOMETHING EQUIVALENT?
21:54:21 >>CATE WELLS: WITH THIS BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT THE
21:54:23 FUNDS WOULD BE PAID.
21:54:25 AS FAR AS THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST TEMPORARY OR
21:54:27 PERMANENT CO FOR THE PROJECT.
21:54:30 SO IT WOULDN'T BE A PERMITTING, IT WOULD BE LATER, JUST
21:54:34 FOR CLARIFICATION.
21:54:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
21:54:36 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
21:54:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
21:54:39 ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS?
21:54:48 WHO IS NEXT?
21:54:49 MR. SHELBY.
21:54:50 HAVE WE HEARD FROM EVERYBODY?
21:54:58 MARY, GO AHEAD.
21:54:59 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY, I THINK THE
21:55:02 APPLICANT.
21:55:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, GO AHEAD.
21:55:07 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
21:55:08 GOOD EVENING.
21:55:09 MS. FEELEY, ARE YOU REPRESENTING APPLICANT?
21:55:16 MS. FEELEY?
21:55:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MS. FEELEY, ARE YOU ON THE LINE?
21:55:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU CAN SEE HER.
21:55:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF YOU ARE MUTED, UNMUTE.
21:55:35 >> CLICK THE MICROPHONE.
21:55:40 >>ABBYE FEELEY: CAN YOU HEAR US NOW?
21:55:44 >> WE CAN.
21:55:45 GOOD EVENING.
21:55:52 ANYBODY THAT'S GOING TO BE TESTIFYING TONIGHT, HAS
21:55:53 EVERYBODY BEEN SWORN?
21:55:56 >>ABBYE FEELEY: WE HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:55:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: GREAT.
21:55:58 THE OTHER QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS UNDER EXTENUATING
21:56:03 CIRCUMSTANCES PRESENTED BY COVID-19 THE CITY ASKS EACH
21:56:06 APPLICANT TO CONFIRM ITS AGREEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT THE
21:56:09 180 DAY TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS
21:56:14 SET FORTH IN 27-148 E OF THE CITY CODE AND 166 EXTENDED.
21:56:23 YOU WAIVE THAT, THAT 180 DAYS ON THE RECORD?
21:56:29 >>ABBYE FEELEY: YES.
21:56:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
21:56:36 >>ABBYE FEELEY: THANK YOU.
21:56:39 GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
21:56:54 CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY?
21:56:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
21:56:56 AND WE CAN SEE YOUR PRESENTATION.
21:56:57 >>ABBYE FEELEY: OKAY.
21:57:09 ABBYE FEELEY, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET WITH THE STEARNS
21:57:15 AND MILLER, I AM HERE WITH RALPH SCHULER, ARCHITECT, AND
21:57:21 THE APPLICANT, AND HIS WIFE.
21:57:27 WE ARE HERE TONIGHT TO PRESENT TO YOU A REZONING AT 2705
21:57:32 NORTH BOULEVARD.
21:57:37 AS STAFF PRESENTED TO YOU, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE
21:57:40 NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AVENUE AND -- BOULEVARD ONE
21:57:46 BLOCK NORTH, AND THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE
21:57:51 SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
21:57:53 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
21:57:56 SHOWN HERE IN BLUE, IT IS .42 ACRES AND IS ELIGIBLE FOR
21:58:09 BONUS UP TO 8 UNITS.
21:58:12 IT WOULD ALLOW 6 UNITS AT THIS LOCATION.
21:58:14 THE R-20 BONUS WOULD ALLOW 8 WHICH IS 7 UNITS AND WE ARE
21:58:23 REALLY HERE TAINT TO ASK FOR ADDITIONAL UNIT.
21:58:29 THE OVERLAY DISTRICT OR HISTORIC DISTRICT.
21:58:32 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
21:58:39 THIS IS A REALLY IMPORTANT SLIDE.
21:58:43 I KNOW THE HOUR IS LATE AND I AM GOING TO TRY TO KEEP
21:58:45 THIS PRESENTATION SHORT.
21:58:46 HOWEVER, WE DO HAVE A FINDING OF INCONSISTENCY FROM THE
21:58:50 PLANNING COMMISSION THAT I FEEL REALLY NEEDS THOROUGH
21:58:54 ADDRESSING.
21:58:55 SO THE R-20 AS SHOWN HERE IN BROWN, AND I WANT TO -- OUR
21:59:06 PROPERTY IS ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER.
21:59:08 TO THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH BOULEVARD IS A RESIDENTIAL LAND
21:59:14 USE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS.
21:59:16 ON THE EAST SIDE, THAT R-20, THAT SMALL POCKET WITH
21:59:23 EUCLID AND THE CMU-35 IS REALLY THE WHOLE OF THE DONUT.
21:59:30 IT ALLOWS FOR TRANSITIONAL DENSITY OF HOUSING FROM BACK
21:59:37 INTO THAT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
21:59:40 SO WE ARE ON THAT PERIPHERY, AND ASKING TO PLACE FOUR
21:59:45 UNITS FACING EUCLID AND FOUR UNITS FACING NORTH
21:59:48 BOULEVARD.
21:59:52 THIS LOCATION, THIS IS A GREAT PART OF THE CITY.
21:59:56 NORTH BOULEVARD IS REALLY THAT ARTERIAL THAT TAKES THE
22:00:00 TAMPA HEIGHTS INTO DOWNTOWN.
22:00:04 IT RUNS PARALLEL WITH TAMPA AND IS A HEAVILY TRAVELED
22:00:11 ROADWAY.
22:00:12 I WOULD LIKE TO YOU KEEP THAT IN MIND AS WE CONTINUE TO
22:00:14 WALK THROUGH, HAS THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THIS AREA,
22:00:20 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLISTS, PARKS, AND TRAVEL DESIGN WHICH IS
22:00:27 COMING BEFORE YOU TONIGHT HAS COME TO ITS FRUITION.
22:00:39 SO MANY OF YOU ARE PROBABLY FAMILIAR WITH THE
22:00:42 INTERSECTION OF COLUMBUS AND NORTH BOULEVARD FOR A LONG,
22:00:47 LONG TIME, THAT NORTHWEST CORNER IN FRONT OF THE
22:00:49 CONVENIENCE STORE.
22:01:01 I HAVE SOME PHOTOS AT THE END OF MIGHT HAVE PRESENTATION.
22:01:05 THERE ARE NONRESIDENTIAL USES JUST A LOT AWAY FROM WHERE
22:01:10 WE ARE.
22:01:10 THIS INTERSECTION HAS SEEN RECENT REDEVELOPMENT, THE
22:01:15 SOUTHEAST CORNER HAS BECOME -- IT'S GETTING READY TO
22:01:22 OPEN.
22:01:22 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER WHICH USED TO BE A CHURCH, THEY
22:01:26 REHABBED THAT BUILDING AND IT IS GOING TO BE A YOGA
22:01:29 STUDIO.
22:01:30 AND THEN ON THE SOUTH FOR DEVELOPMENT THERE ALONG
22:01:36 COLUMBUS.
22:01:38 THE CMU KNOWS THAT FEEDS BACK INTO THE RIVERSIDE TAMPA
22:01:42 HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD REALLY PLAYS A PART IN THE CHARACTER
22:01:47 OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:01:48 THIS PROPERTY IS ALSO VERY CLOSE TO VILLA MADONNA, VERY
22:01:53 CLOSE TO BLAKE HIGH SCHOOL, JULIAN B. LANE PARK, REALLY
22:01:58 HAS A LOT OF GREAT THINGS IN THIS AREA, AND OPPORTUNITIES
22:02:07 TO THE FOREFRONT OF THE CITY.
22:02:08 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:02:15 IN BLUE OF THE EXISTING ZONING IS RM-16.
22:02:17 AS I MENTIONED TO YOU BEFORE, YOU SEE THE R-20 ON THE
22:02:21 EAST SIDE, BOULEVARD, R-10 ON THE WEST SIDE OF BOULEVARD,
22:02:27 THE RM ALLOWING FOR TOWN HALLS AND -- TOWNHOMES AND
22:02:34 MULTIFAMILY.
22:02:35 THE SINGLE-FAMILY DOES HAVE DESIGN STANDARD IN THE LAND
22:02:39 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
22:02:40 THERE ARE THREE OF THEM.
22:02:41 ONE IS AT THE ENTRANCE, OUR NORTH BUILDING, THE ENTRANCES
22:02:48 FACE NORTH BOULEVARD AND OUR SOUTH BUILDING THE ENTRANCES
22:02:51 FACE EUCLID.
22:02:53 THE SECOND IS PROVIDED WHEN YOU ARE PROVIDING THE SPACES.
22:02:59 THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE WITH A GARAGE.
22:03:04 THIS IS OUR SINGLE WAIVER ON THIS ENTIRE PROJECT.
22:03:07 WHICH IS REALLY UNIQUE, BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF
22:03:14 TOWNHOMES WITH FIVE, SIX OR SEVEN.
22:03:16 WE HAVE ONE WAIVER FOR ONE CAR IN THE GARAGE AND ONE CAR
22:03:19 ON THE PARKING PAD.
22:03:21 WE DO HAVE TWO SPACES.
22:03:26 AND INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THIS IS PROBABLY ELIGIBLE FOR
22:03:30 THE UNITS.
22:03:31 WE DID GET DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR THAT NORTH BUILDING.
22:03:34 FOR THE GARAGES IN THEIR CURRENT CONSIDERATION, AND THAT
22:03:39 WAS JUST REVIEWED A FEW WEEKSING A.
22:03:41 IN THEORY THAT WAIVER IS KIND OF A PROVED
22:03:43 ADMINISTRATIVELY RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE FOR THE ONE BUILDING
22:03:46 WE HAVE, BUT BECAUSE WE ARE BEFORE YOU FOR THE EXTRA UNIT
22:03:49 AND THE BONUS, WE ARE ASKING THAT WAIVER ON THE SITE PLAN
22:03:53 THIS EVENING.
22:03:55 THE NEXT CRITERIA IS NO FEWER THAN THREE UNITS AND NO
22:03:59 MORE THAN EIGHT.
22:04:00 BOTH OF OUR BUILDINGS HAVE FOUR UNITS APIECE SO WE ARE IN
22:04:03 LINE WITH THAT STANDARD AS WELL.
22:04:05 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:04:11 THIS IS OUR SITE PLAN DESIGN.
22:04:14 WE REALLY AS I MENTIONED ARE HERE FOR THAT UNIT.
22:04:19 THERE ARE EIGHT UNITS PROPOSED.
22:04:21 ONE FACING EUCLID.
22:04:23 ONE FACING NORTH BOULEVARD.
22:04:26 ONE AT EUCLID HAS VEHICULAR ACCESS.
22:04:33 AND WHAT'S INTERESTING IS EUCLID IS A DIVIDING STREET
22:04:36 THERE, MEDIANS ON EUCLID, WARREN, WOODROW.
22:04:41 SO IT'S KIND OF ONE WAY ON THOSE STREETS IN RELATION TO
22:04:45 TRAFFIC FLOW, BUT WE ARE JUST COMING ON EUCLID, AND
22:04:51 ACTUALLY HAVE TO BE IN A WESTBOUND DIRECTION.
22:04:54 THE SETBACKS FOR THE PROJECTS ARE 7-FOOT TO THE NORTH, 18
22:04:58 FEET SOUTH ALONG EUCLID, 18 FEET WEST ALONG NORTH
22:05:03 BOULEVARD, AND 12 FAT MAXIMUM OF 35 FEET.
22:05:09 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:05:15 THIS IS A LITTLE BETTER SHOWING ELEVATION.
22:05:18 WE ARE PROPOSING -- INTERESTING NOW, THERE ARE TWO
22:05:25 CONTEMPORARY TOWNHOMES GOING UP JUST SOUTH OF WEST
22:05:28 COLUMBUS ON THE CORNER OF FRANCIS, VERY MUCH IN KEEPING
22:05:32 WITH THIS.
22:05:33 THERE ARE SEVERAL NEW HOMES ALONG COLUMBUS.
22:05:37 THE UNIT STALE ALSO IS A QUALITY DESIGN COMPLEMENTARY TO
22:05:42 THE AREA.
22:05:43 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:05:45 SO I WANT TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO TALK ABOUT THIS
22:05:49 PROJECT.
22:05:50 AND I NOTICE WE ONLY HAVE ONE SINGLE WAIVER.
22:05:54 THIS IS REALLY A VERY BALANCED PROJECT.
22:05:58 I WANT TO SHOW IT TO YOU IN A WAY WHERE YOU SECRETED
22:06:04 BRITT DESIGN THAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
22:06:05 EACH OF THESE UNITS HAS A NICE BACKYARD.
22:06:12 WE ARE SAVING THREE LARGE TREES ALONG THE EAST.
22:06:15 WE DON'T HAVE A SINGLE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WAIVER FOR THIS
22:06:18 PROJECT.
22:06:19 WE DON'T HAVE A PARKING WAIVER.
22:06:22 WE ARE PROVIDING ALL THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE UNITS,
22:06:25 PLUS WE ARE PROVIDING ...
22:06:31 I THINK BEING KIND OF MISCONSTRUED IS WE HAVE A PARKING
22:06:35 LOT ALONG BOULEVARD.
22:06:36 WE DON'T HAVE A PARKING LOT.
22:06:41 A CIRCULATION AREA.
22:06:42 AND THE CIRCULATION AREA IS REALLY DRIVEN BY SAFETY.
22:06:49 TRANSPORTATION WILL NOT ALLOW US TO HAVE DRIVEWAYS ON
22:06:54 BOULEVARD BECAUSE IT GIVES A VERY UNSAFE CONDITION.
22:06:58 THIS ALLOWS OUR VISITORS TO COME IN AS WELL AS OUR
22:07:01 RESIDENTS AND ON BOULEVARD AND TO ALSO BE ABLE TO
22:07:11 CIRCULATE ON THE PROPERTY AND THEN GO BACK OUT ONTO
22:07:14 BOULEVARD IN A FORWARD FACING MOTION.
22:07:20 WE ARE MEETING ALL GREEN SPACE BUFFERS, SAVING THE TREES.
22:07:25 WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SAVE GREEN SPACE, NOT ONLY THAT, A
22:07:30 LOT -- THESE ACTUALLY HAVE FULL LANDSCAPE ISLAND, AND
22:07:40 TREES, SO IT'S GOING TO PROVIDE A HEY QUALITY DESIGN AND
22:07:47 TRANSITION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:07:49 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:07:51 SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD, WE TRADE, WE TALKED ABOUT
22:08:02 IT AND TRADE SEVERAL RENOVATIONS.
22:08:08 BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO SEE THAT IF WE MOVE THAT
22:08:10 BUILDING OUT, WE HAVE TO PROVIDE 24-FOOT -- WE DON'T HAVE
22:08:15 AN ALLEY -- 24-FOOT ROADWAY IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY.
22:08:19 YOU LOSE THE BACKYARD.
22:08:20 WE LOSE THE SPACE, AND WE END UP WITH WAY MORE WAIVERS
22:08:26 THAN ONE.
22:08:27 AND ONLY LEFT WITH SEVEN UNITS.
22:08:36 I DON'T THINK IT'S THE BEST PROJECT COMPARED TO THE
22:08:39 PROJECT THAT IS BALANCED WHERE YOU HAVE REALLY GOT THE
22:08:45 BALANCE OF EVERYTHING.
22:08:51 IT'S A FEASIBLE PLANNING SOLUTION TO PROPOSE THIS PROJECT
22:08:54 TO YOU THIS EVENING.
22:08:56 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:09:00 WE DID HEAR WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD TO SAY.
22:09:02 WE WEPT BACK AS A TEAM AND TRIED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
22:09:05 SHOULD WE DO TO TRY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THESE CONCERNS?
22:09:12 A DESIGN SITE PLAN, AND WE HAVE PROVIDED INTERIOR
22:09:18 SIDEWALK, THAT PARKING AREA INAUDIBLE BUT TO THE NORTH
22:09:32 IS -- [ INAUDIBLE ] AND WE HAVE ^ ALSO FLIPPED THE SPACES
22:09:41 TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CIRCULATION AREA, AND WE
22:09:45 INSTALLED A BIKE RACK IN THAT AREA.
22:09:48 IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE, WHEN I DRIVE OVER,
22:09:55 PARK MY BIKE, SO WE HAVE TRADE TO MAKE THE SITUATION
22:10:03 BETTER AND ADDRESS SOME OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
22:10:06 CONCERNS THROUGH THE INSTALLATION OF THAT, THIS SITE PLAN
22:10:12 SHOWS ALL OF THAT, PLUS THE RELOCATION OF THE VISITORS.
22:10:24 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:10:27 I TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE STAFF FINDINGS.
22:10:31 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND
22:10:34 COMPLIANCE STAFF, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CONSTRUCTION.
22:10:39 EIGHT UNITS.
22:10:41 HOWEVER, THEY FOUND NINE OF THE PROJECTS INCONSISTENT.
22:10:44 AND ONE OF THE POLICIES OF THE 911 POLICIES TALKS ABOUT
22:10:52 CONSISTENT OVERALL SETBACK.
22:10:55 GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:10:59 WE HAVE THREE ANALYSIS OF NORTH BOULEVARD TO SEE WHAT THE
22:11:04 SETBACKS WERE, WHAT ARE WE INCONSISTENT WITH?
22:11:07 AND FROM COLUMBUS UP TO WARREN AND THIS IS ACTUALLY ALONG
22:11:13 DOCUMENTED, I BROKE THIS FOR YOU ON SLIDE 13 AND 14.
22:11:24 IF YOU CAN GO TO 14.
22:11:26 14 SHOWS YOU THE NORTHERN END OF THE PROPERTY.
22:11:30 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:11:32 THE SETBACKS ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOULEVARD RANGE FROM 20
22:11:36 FEET UP TO 56 FEET.
22:11:39 THEY ARE NOT ALL 10 OR 20 FEET.
22:11:44 THERE IS NO CONSISTENT -- WELL, ACTUALLY WOULD BE
22:11:46 INCONSISTENT, I GUESS IF YOU WANT TO SAY, WITH WHAT WE
22:11:49 ARE PROPOSING AT ROUGHLY A 50-FOOT, BECAUSE OUR BUFFER,
22:11:57 THE CIRCULATION AREA THAT SIDEWALK, AND THEN THE OTHER
22:12:04 POLICY TALKS ABOUT THE ORIENTATION OF THE ENTRANCES BEING
22:12:08 TO THE STREET.
22:12:13 THE WEST SIDE BOULEVARD IS VERY DIFFERENT FOR
22:12:17 SINGLE-FAMILY ORIENTATION, AND IT IS ALSO SAID, THEY TALK
22:12:27 ABOUT OPPORTUNITIES TO HAVE PROPERTIES FROM THE REAR, AND
22:12:31 HISTORICALLY DEVELOPED IN A DIFFERENT PATTERN.
22:12:39 I DO FEEL THAT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SHOWN, WHAT WE ARE
22:12:42 REQUESTING, THAT IT'S BEEN INCORRECTLY DESCRIBED AS A
22:12:53 PARKING LOT.
22:12:54 YOU HAVE SEEN A LOT OF PARKING LOTS IN THE PAST COUPLE OF
22:12:56 MONTHS, TO CONTEMPLATE PARKING LOTS, BUFFERING, AND THIS
22:13:01 IS A CIRCULATION AREA, AND IT'S A CIRCULATION AREA FOR
22:13:03 SAFETY.
22:13:04 IT IS REALLY CREATING A BALANCED CIRCULATION FOR
22:13:09 PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLISTS, NORTH BOULEVARD AND THE
22:13:16 RESIDENTS THAT WILL LIVE IN THIS PROJECT.
22:13:18 WE FEEL LIKE A UNIFADE DRIVEWAY WITH A FAR SAFER AND
22:13:23 BETTER DESIGN, NOT TO MENTION WE FEEL IT IS CONSISTENT
22:13:28 WITH A LOT OF OTHER POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
22:13:32 AND SLIDE 14, PLEASE.
22:13:38 I'M SORRY, 15.
22:13:39 ONE MORE, PLEASE.
22:13:47 POLICY 1.2, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND MULTIFAMILY, WE'LL
22:13:57 HAVE THAT.
22:14:01 PLEASE GO TO SLIDE 16.
22:14:04 THESE WERE A COUPLE OF OTHER POLICIES.
22:14:06 THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICIES TALKED ABOUT LOCATING --
22:14:18 [ INAUDIBLE ] BECAUSE IT TALKS A LOT ABOUT THE LOCATION
22:14:20 OF THIS PROJECT IN THE BEGINNING.
22:14:23 AND IT ALSO TALKED ABOUT DESIGN AND THE CAREFUL USE OF
22:14:28 BUILDING MASSING, ARTICULATION, PEDESTRIAN SCALE,
22:14:34 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.
22:14:37 IT'S CLEAR WE ARE BALANCED.
22:14:39 WE ARE TRYING TO REALLY ALLOW FOR ALL THESE UNITS IN A
22:14:46 WAY -- THE WAIVERS SPEAK TO IT -- ONE MORE SLIDE.
22:14:55 A COUPLE POLICIES THAT AREN'T MENTIONED THAT I THINK WERE
22:14:57 CONSISTENT WITH THIS MODEL IS THAT IT TALKS ABOUT THE
22:15:00 LOCATION OF THE PERIPHERY.
22:15:03 WE ARE DEFINITELY ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE R-20, A LITTLE
22:15:07 ENCLAVE.
22:15:09 AND NOT ONLY THAT IT TALKS ABOUT REDEVELOPMENT AND NEW
22:15:12 DEVELOPMENT PROVIDED PASSIVE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
22:15:16 I THINK THE REVISION OF BACKYARD AND REALLY THE AMOUNT OF
22:15:20 GREEN SPACE ON THIS PROJECT TO CREATE PLACES FOR PEOPLE
22:15:24 TO HAVE COMMUNITY, A PROJECT OF THIS SIZE SPEAKS TO THE
22:15:30 COMPATIBILITY OF THE PROJECT, THE SURROUNDING AREA AND
22:15:35 THE CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP PLAN.
22:15:36 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
22:15:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MS. FEELEY, YOU ALREADY REACHED THE
22:15:42 15 MARK.
22:15:44 ARE YOU WRAPPING UP?
22:15:45 >>ABBYE FEELEY: YES. THIS IS MY LAST SLIDE RIGHT NOW.
22:15:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
22:15:50 >>ABBYE FEELEY: THANK YOU.
22:15:53 I WILL BE OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS.
22:15:55 WE BELIEVE THAT CITY COUNCIL WILL PROVIDE FOR
22:15:59 REDEVELOPMENT ON A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ALONG A MAJOR
22:16:02 CORRIDOR, AND PROVIDE ALTERNATE HOUSING TO SERVE THE
22:16:09 GROWING POPULATION IN A BALANCED AND APPROPRIATE MANNER,
22:16:12 AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
22:16:15 THANK YOU.
22:16:15 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:16:16 ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
22:16:21 I SEE NONE.
22:16:22 AND I HEAR NONE.
22:16:27 IS THERE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON
22:16:29 THIS ITEM NUMBER 14? ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC FOR ITEM
22:16:31 NUMBER 14?
22:16:37 ALL RIGHT.
22:16:37 I HEAR NO PUBLIC COMMENT.
22:16:40 I SEE NONE.
22:16:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BEFORE WE CLOSE, I JUST WANTED, MS.
22:16:52 FEELEY, WHEN SHE WAS WITH STAFF WAS VERY THOROUGH.
22:16:56 WE ARE SORRY WE LOST YOU, BUT YOU ARE DOING A GREAT JOB.
22:17:00 >>ABBYE FEELEY: THANK YOU.
22:17:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I AGREE, SHE'S ALWAYS VERY DETAILED
22:17:06 IN WHAT SHE DOES, AND DOES IT VERY WELL.
22:17:09 WE APPRECIATE THAT.
22:17:10 ALL RIGHT.
22:17:11 IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, I AM GOING TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC
22:17:14 HEARING.
22:17:14 ALL RIGHT.
22:17:15 THE HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
22:17:18 COUNCIL MEMBER CITRO, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE ITEM NUMBER
22:17:24 14?
22:17:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND REMEMBER THE VISION SHEET, PLEASE.
22:17:31 >> OH, SHOOT.
22:17:35 THERE'S A REVISED REVISION SHEET.
22:17:39 >> ALL RIGHT.
22:17:42 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:17:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF WE REOPEN THE HEARING,
22:17:48 I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THAT.
22:17:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I AM GOING TO REOPEN THIS PUBLIC
22:17:52 HEARING IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION.
22:17:53 THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.
22:17:55 GO AHEAD, MR. SHELBY.
22:17:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DID WE ADDRESS THAT WITH STAFF?
22:17:59 IS STAFF AWARE OF THIS AND HOW DOES IT AFFECT COUNCIL?
22:18:04 >>MARY SAMANIEGO: STAFF IS AWARE THAT THE CHANGES ARE
22:18:06 MINOR.
22:18:09 IF MS. FEELEY WILL SHOW THEM QUICKLY.
22:18:12 THEY ARE ALLOWABLE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
22:18:14 READING PER SECTION 27 ---
22:18:20 >>ABBYE FEELEY: THAT IS THE DOCUMENT.
22:18:22 MARY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:18:32 I ALSO PROVIDED THIS TO DEMONSTRATE THOSE CHANGES.
22:18:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
22:18:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, THAT WILL BE
22:18:48 FINE AND WE'LL ACCEPT THAT, AND --
22:18:52 >>> MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS OR BOARD MEMBERS?
22:18:55 THE REVISION SHEET?
22:18:56 SEEING NONE, LET'S CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
22:18:59 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:19:00 ANY OBJECTIONS? NO?
22:19:01 COUNCILMAN CITRO, GO AHEAD.
22:19:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ITEM FILE REZ 20-14.
22:19:12 A SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
22:19:15 CONSIDERATION.
22:19:15 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
22:19:18 2705 NORTH BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
22:19:21 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
22:19:25 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
22:19:29 PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
22:19:33 ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND I WILL INCLUDE
22:19:37 IF WAIVER AND THE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
22:19:43 READING ALONG WITH THE REVISION SHEET, THAT THE
22:19:51 PETITIONER MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF, AND THE GOALS ONIVES
22:19:57 AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND IF WAIVERS
22:19:59 ARE REQUESTED, CONSULATE WITH SECTION 27-139-4, THE
22:20:07 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE MEETS THE
22:20:10 WAIVERS, AND THE REQUESTED WAIVERS ARE NOT SUBSTANTIALLY
22:20:13 INTERFERE IN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE
22:20:17 PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
22:20:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND ON THE MOTION?
22:20:23 THERE'S A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES.
22:20:25 ROLL CALL VOTE.
22:20:26 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
22:20:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
22:20:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:20:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
22:20:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
22:20:42 >> YES.
22:20:43 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
22:20:46 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 10
22:20:48 AT 5:01 P.M.
22:20:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I CAN.
22:20:55 QUESTION FOR MS. WELLS.
22:20:58 WILL THE DEVELOPMENT READING BE COMING BACK ON SECOND
22:21:01 READING OR IS THIS DONE NOW ADMINISTRATIVELY?
22:21:05 >>CATE WELLS: YES.
22:21:06 THE BONUS AGREEMENT WOULD BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR
22:21:11 APPROVAL AT SECOND READING.
22:21:15 IT'S SCHEDULED IN THE EVENING.
22:21:17 BECAUSE NORMALLY SECOND READING IS IN THE DAYTIME.
22:21:21 THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY.
22:21:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
22:21:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE WILL NOW GO TO INFORMATION
22:21:27 REPORTS AND NEW BUSINESS.
22:21:28 COUNCILMAN VIERA.
22:21:31 >>LUIS VIERA: NOTHING, SIR.
22:21:32 GREAT MEETING TODAY.
22:21:33 LIKE YOU SAID BEFORE, YOU DID GREAT, AND ALSO THANK YOU
22:21:38 FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE.
22:21:39 NOTHING, SIR.
22:21:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES?
22:21:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
22:21:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
22:21:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO I WANTED TO COMPLIMENT EVERYBODY
22:21:52 INVOLVED IN PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.
22:21:54 THE TECHNICAL STAFF, LEGAL STAFF, THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND
22:21:58 THE PLANNING STAFF FOR MAKING THIS WORK.
22:22:01 I THINK VERY WELL.
22:22:03 SO CONGRATULATIONS.
22:22:04 THANK YOU.
22:22:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:22:09 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
22:22:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING FURTHER.
22:22:13 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
22:22:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
22:22:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOTHING, SIR.
22:22:18 THANK YOU.
22:22:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
22:22:19 AND I HAVE NOTHING.
22:22:21 MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ALL DOCUMENTS?
22:22:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED MOTION TO RECEIVE.
22:22:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
22:22:30 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
22:22:31 IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION --
22:22:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE,
22:22:37 PLEASE, ON THAT.
22:22:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET'S DO A ROLL CALL VOTE.
22:22:40 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
22:22:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
22:22:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:22:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
22:22:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
22:22:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:22:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
22:23:00 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
22:23:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:23:04 WE ARE ADJOURNED.
22:23:05 WE'LL SEE YOU BACK MONDAY.
22:23:07 REMEMBER WE HAVE THAT DEPARTMENTAL BRIEFING MEETING WITH
22:23:09 THE CHIEF OF STAFF.
22:23:13 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:23:14 (MEETING ADJOURNED.)
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.