Help & information    View the list of Transcripts




TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2021
6:00 P.M. SESSION





DISCLAIMER:

THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.

05:58:24

06:03:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD EVENING.

06:03:18 I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO

06:03:20 ORDER.

06:03:21 ROLL CALL, PLEASE.

06:03:22 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.

06:03:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.

06:03:26 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.

06:03:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.

06:03:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.

06:03:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.

06:03:36 >>THE CLERK: THERE IS A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT.

06:03:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY.

06:03:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: GOOD EVENING.

06:03:43 MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.

06:03:45 TODAY IS MARCH 11, 2021.

06:03:48 THIS IS A 6 P.M. EVENING MEETING, THE EVENING MEETING.




06:03:51 TONIGHT'S QUASI-JUDICIAL AND LAND USE RELATED EVENING

06:03:54 MEETINGS SUCH AS TONIGHT ARE BEING HELD, AND THIS MEETING

06:04:00 IS BEING HELD DURING THE COVID-19 STATE OF EMERGENCY,

06:04:03 BEING CONDUCTED LIVE WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM PRESENT IN

06:04:06 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.

06:04:07 HOWEVER, IN RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS,

06:04:10 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE

06:04:12 VIRTUALLY THROUGH CITY TELECONFERENCING REFERRED TO BY

06:04:18 FLORIDA STATUTES AND RULES AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA

06:04:20 TECHNOLOGY OR CMT.

06:04:22 TONIGHT'S MEETING IS HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

06:04:23 EMERGENCY RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NUMBER

06:04:26 2020-2525 AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020-490.

06:04:33 TONIGHT'S MEETING IS ABLE TO BE WATCHED, LISTENED AND

06:04:37 VIEWED BY THE PUBLIC AND CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA ON

06:04:42 SPECTRUM CHANNEL 640, FRONTIER 15 AND ON THE INTERNET AT

06:04:46 TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM, ONE WORD.

06:04:51 NOW, IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY THROUGH CMT, YOU

06:04:56 WOULD HAVE HAD TO PREREGISTER FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING, AND

06:05:01 THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THAT, FOR FUTURE REFERENCE, ARE

06:05:04 AVAILABLE AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI, Q-U-A-S-I.

06:05:13 WITH THAT BEING SAID, COUNCIL MEMBERS, FOR THOSE PEOPLE

06:05:18 WHO DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE, OR HAVE

06:05:23 NOT PREREGISTERED, THEY CAN PARTICIPATE BY USING THE

06:05:27 TECHNOLOGY THAT IS LOCATED ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF OLD




06:05:30 CITY HALL, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, AND PLEASE NOTE

06:05:35 THAT USE OF MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING INSIDE THE

06:05:37 BUILDING ARE REQUIRED.

06:05:40 THERE IS ALSO MEANS TO SEND COMMENTS IN BY U.S. MAIL, AND

06:05:45 VIA E-MAIL.

06:05:46 COUNCIL, I WOULD JUST REMIND YOU CERTAINLY AND REMAINED

06:05:50 THE PUBLIC THAT IFS IN PROMOTES FOR YOU TO RECEIVE

06:05:55 COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY DURING A QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING.

06:06:00 SO I WOULD CAUTION THE PUBLIC AGAINST SENDING ANYTHING

06:06:03 DURING THE HEARING, IF THEY ARE GOING TO PARTICIPATE THEY

06:06:07 EITHER NEED TO PREREGISTER OR BE ON THE SECOND FLOOR, AND

06:06:10 IF THEY HAVE DONE IT IN ADVANCE, THROUGH WRITTEN

06:06:14 COMMENTS, RECEIVED BY MAIL OR E-MAIL, THEY HAVE BEEN

06:06:17 DISTRIBUTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL, AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN

06:06:19 THE PERMANENT RECORD OF TONIGHT'S MEETING.

06:06:21 AND ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS THAT ARE RECEIVED WILL BE

06:06:25 AFFORDED EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS

06:06:27 WERE MADE IN PERSON.

06:06:29 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.

06:06:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

06:06:33 ADJUSTMENT SO THE PUBLIC KNOWS, WE ARE GOING TO OPEN THE

06:06:36 PUBLIC HEARINGS, WE ARE GOING TO DO SOME HOUSEKEEPING

06:06:40 BECAUSE SEVERAL ITEMS CAN'T BE HEARD, AND THE REASON WE

06:06:43 ARE GOING TO TAKE A BREAK, AND WE ARE GOING TO STOP AFTER

06:06:46 THAT, IS FOR THE VIGIL BEING HELD FOR THE HERO FROM THE




06:06:52 TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT GAVE HIS LIFE.

06:06:57 AND WHEN YOU READ ABOUT THIS STORY, THIS GENTLEMAN WHO

06:07:02 SERVED FOR MANY YEARS IN THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT,

06:07:05 THERE WAS A WRONG-WAY DRIVER ON THE INTERSTATE GOING

06:07:09 ABOUT 100 MILES PER HOUR, FROM WHAT THE CHIEF OF POLICE

06:07:12 SAID, AND THIS MAN FLICKED -- PUT HIS LIFE ON THE LINE,

06:07:16 SACRIFICED HIS LIFE TO KEEP OTHER PEOPLE SAFE IN THIS

06:07:19 COMMUNITY.

06:07:20 I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY LIVES HE HAS SAVED.

06:07:23 WE WILL NEVER KNOW.

06:07:24 BUT THE FACT THAT HE GAVE HIS LIFE IN THIS SPLIT SECOND

06:07:28 DECISION.

06:07:29 WHEN WE SAY HERO, WE USE THE WORD HERO, THIS IS A HERO.

06:07:33 THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT A HERO IS.

06:07:36 SO WE ARE GOING TO STOP AFTER WE DO THIS HOUSEKEEPING SO

06:07:41 WE CAN GO TO THE CANDLELIGHT VIGIL DOWN AT THE POLICE

06:07:45 STATION, AND WE WILL RESUME.

06:07:47 THAT WILL BE TAKEN TAKING PLACE AT 6:30.

06:07:49 WE'LL START THE AGENDA BACK UP FROM THERE.

06:07:52 MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE HEARINGS?

06:07:55 >> SO MOVED.

06:07:55 >> SECOND.

06:07:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMEMBER GUDES.

06:07:59 SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER CITRO.

06:08:00 ALL IN FAVOR?




06:08:01 OKAY.

06:08:03 WE HAVE SEVEN ITEMS.

06:08:04 WE'LL START WITH ITEM NUMBER 2.

06:08:06 IT CAN'T BE HEARD, AND WE NEED TO HAVE A MOTION TO

06:08:11 WITHDRAW THIS ITEM.

06:08:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MOVED.

06:08:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.

06:08:16 SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON.

06:08:18 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:08:19 ANY OPPOSED?

06:08:20 ALL RIGHT.

06:08:20 ITEM NUMBER 3.

06:08:22 CANNOT BE HEARD.

06:08:23 CAN WE THINK GET A MOTION TO WITHDRAW?

06:08:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE REZ 20-69.

06:08:28 I MOVE TO WITH DRAW IT.

06:08:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER GUDES.

06:08:32 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:08:35 AYE.

06:08:35 ALL RIGHT.

06:08:36 NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 7, A MISNOTICE CANNOT BE HEARD.

06:08:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: REZ 20-86, I MOVE TO WITHDRAW THIS CASE.

06:08:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.

06:08:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: CHAIRMAN, IF I CAN, FOR PURPOSES OF THE

06:08:52 RECORD, THAT IS A MISNOTICE.




06:08:54 IT CANNOT BE HEARD AND WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.

06:08:58 >>JOSEPH CITRO: REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA.

06:08:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE FROM

06:09:01 COUNCILMAN CITRO.

06:09:03 SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER GUDES.

06:09:04 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:09:05 ALL RIGHT.

06:09:07 I DON'T WANT TO START ITEM NUMBER 1 AND THEN HAVE TO STOP

06:09:10 MID HEARING AND THEN RESUME IT SO WE DON'T LOSE TRACK.

06:09:13 I KNOW MR. MAPS IN AND MR. COLLINS, YOU ARE ON THE LINE,

06:09:16 SO I APOLOGIZE, BUT I WOULD SAY IF WE COULD GO TO NEW

06:09:21 BUSINESS, IF YOU ALL ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT, WE'LL GET

06:09:23 THAT OUT OF THE WAY AND AFTER WE TAKE UP NEW BUSINESS,

06:09:26 WE'LL TAKE A RECESS SO WE CAN ATTEND THE VIGIL AT THE

06:09:32 POLICE STATION.

06:09:33 COUNCILMAN VIERA, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING?

06:09:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A COUPLE, IF I MAY.

06:09:42 ACTUALLY, YOU DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A FIRST.

06:09:44 THIS IS KIND OF INTERESTING.

06:09:46 MARCH 13th OF THIS YEAR IS DOG -- SERVICE DOG DAY AND

06:09:51 DOG VETERAN DAY, AND I AM MOTIONING FOR A MOTION

06:09:54 COMMENDATION FOR A DOG, A DOG BY THE NAME OF SHADOW WHO

06:09:57 WAS A SPECIAL DOG WHO HELPED FIND IEDs OVERSEAS, HELPED

06:10:02 SAVE THE LIVES OF MANY OF OUR TROOPS.

06:10:04 AND I WILL BE GIVING A COMMENDATION TO SHADOW ON




06:10:07 SATURDAY.

06:10:08 HIS OWNER IS A GENTLEMAN BY THE NAME OF TIM REID WHO IS A

06:10:11 MARINE, AND COMBAT VETERAN WHO LOST I THINK HIS LEFT LEG

06:10:17 OVERSEAS DUE TO AN IED, IF I MAY.

06:10:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.

06:10:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR?

06:10:25 >>LUIS VIERA: IS THAT A FIRST WITH AN ANIMAL GETTING A

06:10:27 COMMENDATION?

06:10:28 JUST INTERESTING.

06:10:29 NEXT, IF I MAY, I MOTION FOR THE CITY STAFF TO PROVIDE A

06:10:33 STAFF REPORT AND ADDITIONAL LIGHTING AT TACOMA PARK AT

06:10:37 THE REQUEST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND FURTHER THAT SAID

06:10:40 REPORT BE DONE IN 30 DAYS.

06:10:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.

06:10:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: COULD WE PICK A DATE ON THAT?

06:10:49 >>LUIS VIERA: FIRST OR SECOND WEEK OR THIRD WEEK --

06:10:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WAS THAT A WRITTEN REPORT?

06:10:55 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, THAT'S FINE.

06:10:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:

06:10:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: APRIL 15th?

06:11:01 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

06:11:01 APRIL 15th.

06:11:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.

06:11:05 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:11:06 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.




06:11:07 AND THEN LASTLY, I CAN DO THESE LATER.

06:11:11 ON MARCH 25th, THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BAR

06:11:13 ASSOCIATION IS DOING WHAT THEY CALL A LIBERTY BELL AWARD

06:11:16 WHICH IS A VERY PRESTIGIOUS, THE MOST PRESTIGIOUS AWARD

06:11:20 THAT SOMEONE GIVES TO SOMEONE NOT AN ATTORNEY, PAST

06:11:23 RECIPIENTS INCLUDE JANE CASTOR, NORMAN SCHWARZKOPF, A

06:11:29 FINE GENTLEMAN BY THE NAME OF JIM FLETCHER WHO SOME OF

06:11:32 YOU ALL KNOW IS GOING TO BE GETTING IT.

06:11:34 JIM IS A DEAR FRIEND OF MINE, PRESIDENT OF VIETNAM

06:11:36 VETERANS OF AMERICA OF TAMPA, AND I JUST REALLY LOVE JIM

06:11:39 TO DEATH.

06:11:40 I DO.

06:11:40 I THINK JIM IS SUCH A WONDERFUL PERSON.

06:11:43 AND I WOULD ASK THAT AT THE MARCH 25th WORKSHOP --

06:11:47 AND THIS WOULD BE A SPECIAL REQUEST.

06:11:51 JIM, COLONEL FLETCHER, WILL BE HERE AT 12:00 DOWNSTAIRS

06:11:54 DURING THE BREAK, COLONEL REYES, I BELIEVE JUDGE HOLDER

06:11:58 AND I WILL BE PRESENTING HIM THE LIBERTY BELL FOR THE BAR

06:12:01 ASSOCIATION, AND I WOULD LOVE AT 11:15 OWN THAT DAY OF A

06:12:05 WORKSHOP MORE OR LESS IF WE COULD JUST TAKE A COUPLE

06:12:09 MINUTES OUT FOR A COMMENDATION, A MAYORAL PROCLAMATION

06:12:12 FOR COLONEL FLETCHER, IF I MAY.

06:12:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.

06:12:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.

06:12:17 ALL IN FAVOR?




06:12:18 AYE.

06:12:19 >>LUIS VIERA: AND THAT'S IT FOR NOW.

06:12:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO, ANYTHING UNDER NEW

06:12:25 BUSINESS?

06:12:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING, BUT TO THE FAMILY OF OFFICER

06:12:31 MADSEN, OUR HEARTS AND PRAYERS GO OUT TO YOU, AND NOTHING

06:12:35 COULD BRING HIM BACK.

06:12:36 HOWEVER, HE GAVE HIS LIFE AS A COP'S COP, AS A MAN'S MAN,

06:12:41 AS A SOLDIER'S SOLDIER.

06:12:44 AND HE IS A THE TRUE HERO.

06:12:46 NOTHING, MR. CHAIR.

06:12:47 THANK YOU.

06:12:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES?

06:12:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOTHING, BUT JUST TO ECHO WHAT MR.

06:12:53 CITRO SAID.

06:12:54 I RECEIVED SEVERAL PHONE CALLS FROM SO MANY OFFICERS WHO

06:12:57 RESPONDED TO THE SCENE, THE FIRST ON THE SCENE.

06:13:00 AND PRAYERS TO THE FAMILY, OFFICER MADSEN, OFFICERS WHO

06:13:07 RESPONDED THAT DAY, BECAUSE THAT'S A DIFFERENT TYPE OF

06:13:15 FEELING, A DIFFERENT TYPE OF FEELING, MY FRIENDS,

06:13:21 SOMETHING THAT -- SO I PRAY FOR THE FAMILY, ALSO PRAY FOR

06:13:27 THE OFFICERS WHO WERE THERE TO ASSIST, AND PRIOR TO THEM

06:13:34 AS WELL.

06:13:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

06:13:37 COUNCILMAN CARLSON.




06:13:38 >>BILL CARLSON: JUST ECHO THE SAME THING.

06:13:41 YOU KNOW, PRAYERS AND THOUGHTS FOR THE FAMILY.

06:13:43 WE ARE GOING TO SEE THEM IN A FEW MINUTES, BUT IT'S JUST

06:13:46 HEART BREAKING.

06:13:47 SO THANK YOU TO HIS FAMILY AND TO ALL THE FAMILIES OF

06:13:51 POLICE OFFICERS WHOSE LOVED ONES ARE PUTTING THEIR LIVES

06:13:54 ON THE LINE EVERY DAY.

06:13:56 THANK YOU.

06:13:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA?

06:13:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST WANT TO SAY SOMETIMES THERE

06:14:03 ARE WORDS THAT CANNOT DESCRIBE WHAT HAPPENED TO THE

06:14:06 OFFICER, AND IT'S JUST A TRAGIC THING THAT HAPPENED.

06:14:11 OUR PRAYERS WITH HIM AND HIS FAMILY.

06:14:16 >>LUIS VIERA: AND IF I MAY, JUST TO PUT IN MY TWO CENTS

06:14:19 ON THAT, OBVIOUSLY, MOST SINCERE CONDOLENCES AND

06:14:24 SYMPATHIES TO THE FAMILY OF OFFICER MADSEN.

06:14:26 I FOUND OUT THAT HIS WIDOW, THE WIFE, ACTUALLY A POLICE

06:14:29 OFFICER AS WELL, LAW ENFORCEMENT, COLLEGE AT USF, AND

06:14:34 IT'S JUST TERRIBLE.

06:14:35 BEFORE HE CAME TO TPD HE SERVED AS A MARINE, WAS IN

06:14:38 COMBAT, AND YOU SEE THAT IN A LOT OF OUR FIRST

06:14:41 RESPONDERS, WHICH IS A LOT OF THEM, BEFORE THEY SERVED AS

06:14:44 FIRST RESPONDERS, SOME ARE IN THE NATIONAL GUARD,

06:14:47 ET CETERA, OR IN THE RESERVES, OR IN THE MILITARY.

06:14:53 SO JUST TERRIBLE.




06:14:55 AND THAT'S THE RISK THAT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TAKE

06:15:01 EVERY DAY WHENEVER THEY GO OTHER THAN THE JOB.

06:15:03 AND THAT'S WHY WE ALWAYS HAVE TO RESPECT AND HONOR THEM

06:15:07 ALL THE DAMN TIME.

06:15:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

06:15:11 COUNCILMAN CITRO, I GIVE YOU THE GAVEL.

06:15:15 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENTS A COMMENDATION

06:15:17 TO PETE BRECK, DIRECTOR OF THE ASSETS MANAGEMENT

06:15:22 DEPARTMENT WHO WILL BE RETIRING AFTER NINE YEARS OF

06:15:24 DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF TAMPA AND FROM APRIL

06:15:27 1st IN PERSON ON THE SECOND FLOOR.

06:15:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THERE'S A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN

06:15:33 MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.

06:15:36 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:15:36 ANY OPPOSED?

06:15:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND MY CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF

06:15:41 DAVID HEY.

06:15:42 HIS MOTHER PASSED AWAY.

06:15:43 AND DAVID IS INSTRUMENTAL HERE, AND SO MANY OF OUR CASES

06:15:49 IN CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, BUT MY CONDOLENCES TO HIM AND

06:15:52 HIS ENTIRE FAMILY.

06:15:54 AND THAT'S IT.

06:15:56 ALL RIGHT.

06:15:56 WE ARE IN RECESS.

06:15:58 [SOUNDING GAVEL]




06:15:59 [RECESS]

07:02:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE MR. SCOTT.

07:02:33 AND YOU ARE REPRESENTING ITEM NUMBER 1?

07:02:38 PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM OR IF YOU ARE VIRTUAL, TURN ON

07:02:41 YOUR CAMERA AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.

07:02:43 >>THE CLERK: I HAVE TWO PEOPLE FOR THIS ITEM AND I CAN

07:03:07 SWEAR THEM IN.

07:03:10 >> JOHN GRANDOFF: MAY WE PASS OVER?

07:03:12 MY CLIENT IS ON THE WAY BACK TO CITY HALL AND WOULD LIKE

07:03:17 TO WAIT UNTIL THEY RETURN.

07:03:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.

07:03:20 WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU.

07:03:22 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: HE JUST ARRIVED.

07:03:24 GIVE ME ONE MOMENT.

07:03:25 HE JUST ARRIVED.

07:03:32 GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL.

07:03:34 MY NAME IS JOHN GRANDOFF, MY ADDRESS IS SUITE 3700 BANK

07:03:38 OF AMERICA PLAZA.

07:03:40 AND I HAVE THE PLEASURE OF REPRESENTING MEESHA ZELTSER

07:03:53 AND HIS FAMILY THIS EVENING IN THIS APPLICATION. MEESHA

07:03:53 IS BEHIND ME. AFTER THE STAFF REPORT IS PROVIDED TO YOU

07:03:53 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS PROVIDED TO YOU, HE WOULD

07:03:56 LIKE TO SPEAK FIRST, AND I WILL SPEAK AFTER MEESHA.

07:04:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.

07:04:03 MR. MANASSE.




07:04:05 IF WE CAN RAISE THE VOLUME FOR MR. MANASSE.

07:04:08 WE CAN BARELY HEAR HIM.

07:04:12 OH, I'M SORRY, WE HAVE TO SWEAR THEM IN.

07:04:15 MR. COLLINS, SCOTT AND MANASSE.

07:04:18 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).

07:04:20 >>THE CLERK: AND THE CLERK'S OFFICE -- ON THIS ITEM.

07:04:28 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

07:04:32 ITEM NUMBER 1 IS FILE REZ 20-41 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED

07:04:36 AT 2912 WEST EUCLID AVENUE.

07:04:39 THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS REZONING FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL

07:04:42 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.

07:04:46 I WILL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT

07:04:47 AND PLEASE RETURN TO ME SO I CAN FINISH MINE.

07:04:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.

07:04:51 >> SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.

07:04:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: COULD WE HAVE THE SCREEN ON THE

07:05:06 MONITORS, PLEASE, IN THE CONTROL?

07:05:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SHARE THE SCREEN FOR MR. COLLINS.

07:05:17 THERE WE GO.

07:05:17 GO AHEAD, SIR.

07:05:29 DANNY COLLINS WITH PLANNING DISTRICT STAFF.

07:05:32 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

07:05:33 THIS IS BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:05:38 HIMES AVENUE, SPORTS COMPLEX, ONE MILE TO THE SOUTHWEST

07:05:42 OF THIS SITE.




07:05:43 THE SITE IS WITHIN PROXIMITY OF TRANSIT.

07:05:46 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 4600 TO

07:05:51 THE LEFT OF THE SITE.

07:05:54 THE SITE IS IN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.

07:05:57 SUBJECT SITE -- HERE IS A MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE

07:06:02 PROPERTY.

07:06:06 [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] IT'S WITHIN ONE BLOCK TO -- AVENUE.

07:06:19 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

07:06:22 THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP -- [~AUDIO DISTORTION~]

07:06:33 WITHIN A BLOCK OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:06:45 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE

07:06:47 APPLICATION AND FINDS NO IMPACT TO THE SURROUNDING

07:06:50 NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:06:50 THE PROPOSED IS REZONING IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE.

07:07:06 [INDISCERNIBLE]

07:07:09 THE REQUEST IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POLICIES AND

07:07:14 HOUSING TAMPA'S POPULATION.

07:07:16 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON UNDER

07:07:20 UTILIZED LAND, SO THAT ADEQUATE HOUSING IS DEVELOPED.

07:07:25 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF

07:07:28 FINDS THE REQUEST -- WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

07:07:34 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

07:07:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OF THE GENTLEMAN AT

07:07:38 THIS TIME?

07:07:39 HEARING NONE, OKAY.




07:07:41 MR. GRANDOFF?

07:07:46 MR. MANASSE, I'M SORRY.

07:07:49 >>RYAN MANASSE: IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.

07:08:01 THANK YOU.

07:08:02 SO ITEM NUMBER 1 IS FILE REZ 20-41 FOR THE PROPERTY

07:08:05 LOCATED AT 2912 WEST EUCLID AVENUE.

07:08:09 THE REQUEST AGAIN IS TO REZONE FROM RS-60 TO RS-50

07:08:13 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, AND THROUGH EUCLIDEAN ZONING

07:08:18 REQUEST THERE ARE NO WAIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS

07:08:21 REZONING REQUEST.

07:08:21 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING REZONING.

07:08:24 CURRENTLY IT INCLUDES TWO PLATTED LOTS, LOTS 6 AND 7 OF

07:08:27 THE BELLA VISTA SUBDIVISION, PROPERTY IS 112 FEET IN

07:08:33 WIDTH FOR A LOT AREA OF 13,750 SQUARE FEET.

07:08:36 THE LOTS WERE ORIGINALLY PLATTED AT 55 FEET IN WIDTH AND

07:08:39 125 FEET IN LENGTH, SO A LOT AREA OF 6,875 SQUARE FEET.

07:08:46 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED FIVE BLOCKS TO THE WEST OF THE

07:08:49 WEST EUCLID AVENUE, BAYSHORE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION AND

07:08:53 ITS VACANT.

07:08:53 THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY

07:08:56 RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST IN RS-60

07:09:00 ZONING DISTRICT.

07:09:02 IF THIS REQUEST IS APPROVED, THEY MUST ADHERE TO ALL CITY

07:09:07 OF TAMPA REGULATIONS.

07:09:11 THIS IS THE SUBDIVISION WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN




07:09:15 1916 WITH 37 TOTAL LOTS, RANGING FROM 50 FEET TO 125 FEET

07:09:18 IN WIDTH WITH DEPTHS OF 125 FEET TO 26079 FEET.

07:09:25 LOTS 6 AND 7 AND THE SUBJECT APPLICATION SEEKS TO

07:09:28 REESTABLISH THOSE PLOTS AS ORIGINALLY PLATTED.

07:09:34 ALL OF THE SUBDIVISION AND THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE

07:09:38 REVISED MAP OF BAY CITY SUBDIVISION, ANALYSIS INCLUDED.

07:09:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: TOTAL ZONING LOTS AND 72 OR 58% OF

07:09:47 THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR

07:09:50 GREATER AND 52 OR 42% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED

07:09:53 WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.

07:09:56 AND THOSE ARE TYPICALLY HISTORICAL PLATTED LOTS.

07:09:59 PURSUANT TO THE REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

07:10:01 PATTERN THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 26 TOTAL ZONING LOTS,

07:10:04 18 OR 75% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH

07:10:07 OF 06 FEET OR GREATER AND 8 OR 25% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED

07:10:11 WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.

07:10:14 THE 2900 BLOCK OF EUCLID AVENUE WHICH IS BOTH SIDES OF

07:10:17 THE STREET CONTAINS 24 TOTAL ZONING LOTS AND 24 OF THOSE

07:10:22 LOTS OR 100% OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH

07:10:24 OF 60 FEET GREATER.

07:10:27 ZERO HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH MUCH 59.99 FEET OR

07:10:30 LESS.

07:10:30 THE BLOCK FACE ALSO OF WEST EUCLID AVENUE CONTAINS 12

07:10:34 TOTAL ZONING LOTS AND 100% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN

07:10:36 DEVELOPED AT 60 FEET OR GREATER, AND ZERO WITH 59.99 FEET




07:10:40 OR LESS.

07:10:42 I WILL GO ON THE MAP THAT STAFF USED FOR THE STAFF

07:10:48 ANALYSIS.

07:10:49 THE SUBJECT SITE IS HEAR IN RED AND HATCHED IN BLACK.

07:10:53 THIS IS EUCLID AVENUE.

07:10:54 AND THEN YOU HAVE THE WAVERLY GOING NORTH FROM THE

07:11:00 SUBJECT SITE.

07:11:02 OUR STAFF ANALYSIS BREAKDOWN NUMBERS FOR LOT WIDTHS AT

07:11:05 THE TOP OF THE SCREEN AND THIS WAS ALSO PROVIDED IN YOUR

07:11:07 STAFF REPORTS.

07:11:10 IF AERIAL MAP SHOWS THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL LANDMARKS

07:11:13 WITHIN A THOUSAND FEET AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED

07:11:15 IN RED, THE SAME AREA, BAY VILLA TO THE WEST, WAVERLY TO

07:11:21 THE NORTH IN FRONT OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:11:23 THERE'S SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE.

07:11:25 THE SUBJECT SITE ITSELF TO THE LEFT AND THEN NORTH OF THE

07:11:28 SITE, IN THE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, IN RS ZONING DISTRICT.

07:11:32 SOUTH OF THE SITE TO THE LEFT OF YOUR SCREEN AND EAST OF

07:11:35 THE SITE TO THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN.

07:11:38 AND THEN AGAIN WEST OF THE SITE TO THE LEFT OF THE

07:11:40 SCREEN, NORTHWEST OF THE SITE TO THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN.

07:11:44 AND THIS IS THE VIEW DOWN NORTH WAVERLY WHICH IS THE ROAD

07:11:47 THAT EXTENDS NORTH AND THEN EAST ON EUCLID AND THAT'S

07:11:49 GOING TOWARDS BAYSHORE.

07:11:51 THE PHOTO TO THE RIGHT IS WEST ON EUCLID.




07:11:55 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED

07:11:58 THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF

07:12:00 TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

07:12:01 IF YOU WOULD PLEASE REFER TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT

07:12:03 COORDINATION RELATED TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN

07:12:05 OF THE IMMEDIATE AREA.

07:12:07 SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO

07:12:09 ANSWER THEM.

07:12:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?

07:12:12 HEARING NONE, MR. GRANDOFF?

07:12:14 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: YES.

07:12:16 THANK YOU, MR. MASSEY.

07:12:19 I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOU TO MEESHA ZELTSER.

07:12:25 I WILL TELL YOU ABOUT HIS FAMILY AND HIS PLANS FOR THE

07:12:28 PROPERTY.

07:12:28 >> COUNCILMEN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

07:12:32 MY NAME IS MIKHAIL ZELTSER, MY WIFE GALINA AND THREE OF

07:12:37 OUR YOUNG KIDS UNDER TEN AND MY MOTHER IN LAW LIVES

07:12:42 ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION AT 2908 WEST EUCLID

07:12:45 AVENUE.

07:12:46 WE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED RIGHT NEXT TO US ABOUT THREE

07:12:48 YEARS AGO WHEN OUR NEIGHBOR PASSED AWAY.

07:12:52 WITH THE INTENT OF HAVING THE PROPERTY FOR MY

07:12:55 MOTHER-IN-LAW TO LIVE WHO IS AGING, AND GETTING HARD FOR

07:12:58 HER TO GO UP AND DOWN THE STAIRS.




07:13:01 WE HAVE TO USE PART OF OUR RETIREMENT FUNDS TO BE ABLE TO

07:13:05 PURCHASE THAT PROPERTY.

07:13:06 WE WANT TO BE NEARBY, AND AS YOU GUYS KNOW, THE PROPERTY

07:13:10 VALUATION HAVE BEEN GOING UP SO MUCH IT'S HARD TO FIND A

07:13:12 SMALL HOUSE THAT'S AFFORDABLE FOR SOMEBODY THAT IS

07:13:15 RETIRED.

07:13:16 UNFORTUNATELY, THE LOT IS SO BIG THAT IT'S TOO MUCH FOR

07:13:20 WHAT SHE NEEDS FOR THE HOUSE SIZE THAT SHE NEEDS.

07:13:23 THE INTENT FOR US IS TO BE ABLE TO SUBDIVIDE INTO TWO

07:13:26 LOTS TO MATCH WHAT BAY VISTA WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED FOR

07:13:31 AND TO BE ABLE TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE STORY

07:13:35 RANCH FOR HER SO SHE CAN HELP US RAISE HER GRANDKIDS, AND

07:13:39 BE ABLE SOMETIME REVERSE FOR HER INVESTMENT FOR HER

07:13:45 RETIREMENT SO SHE DOESN'T USE HER RETIREMENT FUNDS.

07:13:48 WE HAVE BEEN IN THE AREA FOR OVER TEN YEARS.

07:13:50 WE LIVED IN THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR.

07:13:52 BOTH MY WIFE AND I WENT TO USF.

07:13:54 WE ARE PRETTY CLOSE TO THE COMMUNITY.

07:13:56 BY NO MEANS AM I A DEVELOPER OR FAMILY ARE DEVELOPERS.

07:14:00 IT'S PURELY FOR OUR FAMILY'S USE.

07:14:02 WE THINK WANTS TO BE SURE OUR KIDS ARE STAYING CLOSE TO

07:14:05 THEIR GRANDMOTHER.

07:14:06 WE HAVE AN AREA FOR THEM TO RUN AROUND, AND SHORTCOMING

07:14:11 IN SOUTH TAMPA AS YOU GUYS KNOW.

07:14:13 AND WITH PROPERTY VALUES GOING UP IT'S HARD TO FIND




07:14:16 SOMETHING CLOSER TO US.

07:14:18 AND THAT WAS OUR SOLUTION.

07:14:19 AS YOU GUYS SAW ON THE MAP, AND MY BACKGROUND IS

07:14:24 ENGINEERING, AND I OVERANALYZE EVERYTHING.

07:14:28 AS A VISUAL AID, I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY HOW TO TURN THIS

07:14:32 ON.

07:14:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT WILL GO ON BY ITSELF.

07:14:35 >> OKAY.

07:14:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU COULD JUST BRING IT UP.

07:14:41 WHILE WE ARE WAITING IF YOU COULD CONFIRM THAT YOU HAVE

07:14:47 BEEN SWORN IN, PLEASE.

07:14:48 >> I HAVE.

07:14:50 THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT OBVIOUSLY THE ZONING

07:14:52 DEPARTMENT ALREADY PUT TOGETHER FOR YOU.

07:14:54 BUT WHAT YOU SEE IN GREEN, I WANT TO POINT OUT THE

07:14:59 PROPERTIES AROUND OUR PROPERTY WHICH IS IN PURPLE THAT

07:15:01 HAVE THE 50-FOOT WIDE LOTS AND HAVE HOUSES DEVELOPED ON

07:15:05 THEM, THAT YELLOW IS THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION.

07:15:09 SO WE ARE MERELY TRYING TO MATCH THAT OF WHAT ALREADY HAS

07:15:12 BEEN DEVELOPED IN THE AREA.

07:15:14 I AM NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING INCONSISTENT WITH THAT FOR

07:15:19 OUR FAMILY'S USE.

07:15:20 WITH THAT I WILL GO AHEAD AND PASS IT ON TO JOHN GRANDOFF

07:15:23 TO FINISH THE COMMENTS.

07:15:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.




07:15:29 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

07:15:32 >> MR. GRANDOFF, ANYTHING ELSE?

07:15:35 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: YES.

07:15:36 MADAM CLERK, MY TIME, PLEASE?

07:15:38 >> YOU HAVE 12 MINUTES.

07:15:41 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: OKAY.

07:15:42 WE'LL DO THAT QUICKER.

07:15:46 IN 1916, THE BELL A VISTA PLAT WAS LAID ON THE GROUND AND

07:15:52 CREATED TWO 55-FOOT LOTS.

07:15:55 MEESHA AND HIS FAMILY WANTS TO RETURN BACK TO THE PLAN OF

07:15:58 THAT PLAT.

07:16:00 MEESHA LIVES HERE AND WANTS TO BUILD TWO HOMES THERE ON

07:16:04 55-FOOT LOTS.

07:16:06 THE ZONING IS RS-60 SO WE ARE REZONING TO RS-50.

07:16:12 THE FINDINGS THAT MR. MANASSE QUITE ABLY PREPARED, WHICH

07:16:17 GOES INTO THE PERCENTAGES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BASICALLY

07:16:22 BREAK DOWN TO 58% OR GREATER THAN 60 FEET, AND 42% ARE

07:16:33 LESS THAN 60 FEET.

07:16:35 OUR PURPLE THIS EVENING IS NOT TO SPLIT HAIRS OR DEBATE

07:16:41 MATHEMATICS.

07:16:42 I THINK THE GREATER GUIDE FOR YOU THIS EVENING IS SIMPLY

07:16:48 THE POPULATION GROWTH OF OUR CITY, PARTICULARLY THE INTER

07:16:54 BAY PENINSULA AND THE FINDINGS FROM THE PLANNING

07:16:56 COMMISSION, WHICH FOUND NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS

07:16:59 REZONING.




07:17:01 TO QUOTE ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE REPORT.

07:17:04 IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROJECTED POPULATION INCREASE

07:17:07 WITH LIMITED LAND RESOURCES, TO MORE EFFICIENTLY AND

07:17:11 PURCHASE SEWER A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS MORE

07:17:14 ECONOMICALLY SOUND, BY ENCOURAGING IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT ON

07:17:18 VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES.

07:17:22 WE ARE AS A CITY ENCOURAGING IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT ALL OVER

07:17:24 THE CITY, AND THE INTERBAY PENINSULA IS JUST DUE IN-FILL

07:17:31 DEVELOPMENT AS OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY, AS PROVEN BY THE

07:17:34 ORIGINAL PLAT.

07:17:35 WE ARE SIMPLY BUILDING WHAT WAS ULTIMATELY CONTEMPLATED

07:17:38 BY THE SUBDIVIDER.

07:17:41 IN THE FINDINGS OF FACT ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT,

07:17:47 QUOTE, FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE

07:17:49 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:17:50 AND I AM QUOTING RESIDENTIALLY ZONING PROPERTIES FRONTING

07:17:53 A LONG THIS PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE HAVE AN OVERALL

07:17:57 DENSITY OF 4.82 UNITS PER ACRE.

07:18:00 THIS PROJECT WILL BE A DENSITY THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH

07:18:03 THE RESIDENTIAL 10 LAND USE PLAN.

07:18:06 NOW, WHAT AM I SPEAKING ABOUT?

07:18:08 THE EFFECTIVE DENSITY OF THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO BE 6 .5

07:18:13 PER ACRE.

07:18:14 THE LAND USE PLAN, WHICH ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT, DIRECTS

07:18:18 DEVELOPMENT, PLANS DEVELOPMENT, THAT THIS GENTLEMAN




07:18:23 RELIES UPON, IS TEN UNITS PER ACRE.

07:18:27 SO WE ARE WAY SUB, BELOW THE POSSIBLE CEILING OF OUR TEN,

07:18:34 AND TO PROPERLY DISTRIBUTE MUNICIPAL SERVICES,

07:18:37 PARTICULARLY WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, YOU

07:18:40 HAVE TO USE THE DENSITY THAT'S ON THE PLAN TO DEVELOP

07:18:45 ACCORDING TO THE PLAN, SERVE THE MUNICIPAL SERVICES THAT

07:18:49 TURNS THE COMMON WILL.

07:18:51 WHAT'S INTERESTING ABOUT MEESHA, HE'S NOT A DEVELOPER

07:18:53 THAT'S COMING IN JUST TO BUILD TWO HOMES AND MOVE ON.

07:18:56 THIS IS HIS FAMILY PROJECT.

07:18:57 THIS WILL BE A FAMILY PROPERTY, A LEGACY PROPERTY TO HIS

07:19:02 FAMILY.

07:19:02 AND I THINK THE LAND USE PLAN AND THE CATEGORY

07:19:07 CONTEMPLATES WHAT MEESHA IS PLANNING.

07:19:10 THE REPORT CONCLUDES ON THE FINAL PAGE THAT THERE MUST BE

07:19:14 AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING AVAILABLE TO MEET THE

07:19:17 NEEDS, TO MEET THE NEEDS.

07:19:20 HOUSING IS A NEED OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE

07:19:24 POPULATION.

07:19:24 THIS IS POLICY 2.1.2.

07:19:27 AND IT CONCLUDES BY SAYING THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

07:19:30 IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE FINE GRAIN

07:19:34 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ALONG WEST EUCLID AVENUE, SUPPORTS

07:19:37 MANY OF THE HOUSING POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,

07:19:39 AND IS CONSISTENT -- CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG-RANGE




07:19:45 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ENCOURAGED BY THE RESIDENTIAL 10

07:19:53 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY.

07:19:56 CONSISTENT AND ENCOURAGED.

07:20:00 THOSE ARE VERY IMPORTANT WORDS IN LAND USE PLANNING.

07:20:05 I HAVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT THAT'S BEEN ISSUED BY A

07:20:09 GENTLEMAN WHO LIVES ON BAY VILLA.

07:20:17 IN SUMMARY, MR. MATT O'BRIEN WROTE THIS LETTER, 1001 WEST

07:20:23 BAY VILLA AND REZONING APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE

07:20:28 APPLICANT IS REQUESTING.

07:20:29 I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUEST, AND I BELIEVE THAT

07:20:32 THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM RS-60 TO RS-50 WILL BE

07:20:36 CONSISTENT -- THERE'S THAT WORD AGAIN -- WITH THE

07:20:40 CHARACTER.

07:20:40 NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:20:41 I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THIS INTO THE RECORD.

07:20:43 AND I WILL CLOSE MY REMARKS BY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING

07:20:49 APPROVAL.

07:20:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:20:51 DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:20:54 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: WE HAVE JUST AS A FOOTNOTE, WE ARE

07:20:57 SCHEDULED TO COME HERE LAST YEAR SO WE FINALLY HAVE

07:21:00 ARRIVED AFTER THE VIRUS, AND MEESHA HAS BEEN VERY PATIENT

07:21:06 AND WANTED ME TO MENTION THAT TO YOU. IN CLOSING WE

07:21:08 SUBMIT THAT THERE IS AMPLE SUPPORT AND EVIDENCE TO

07:21:12 APPROVE THIS REZONING.




07:21:13 I HAVE NOT HAD ANY OPPOSITION TO THIS.

07:21:16 AND I REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.

07:21:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.

07:21:19 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. GRANDOFF, I CANNOT ASK, BUT I AM ASK

07:21:24 GOING TO JUST MAKE A STATEMENT.

07:21:26 IF IT WAS GOING TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS WHY DIDN'T

07:21:28 YOU GO FOR A PD?

07:21:29 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: BECAUSE IT'S SIMPLER.

07:21:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO:

07:21:37 [ LAUGHTER ]

07:21:37 THANK YOU.

07:21:38 I NEEDED A LAUGH TONIGHT.

07:21:39 THANK YOU FOR THAT.

07:21:41 I'M SURE WE ALL KNOW THAT WHATEVER WE ARE GOING TO REZONE

07:21:44 WITH GOES WITH THE PROPERTY.

07:21:46 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: RIGHT.

07:21:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND THERE MIGHT BE A FEAR THAT THERE

07:21:50 MIGHT BE MORE THAN WHAT'S BEING PRESENTED IN THE FUTURE,

07:21:55 BECAUSE WHATEVER WE REZONE IS GOING TO GO WITH THE

07:21:59 PROPERTY.

07:21:59 THANK YOU, MR. GRANDOFF.

07:22:01 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: MAY I RESPOND BRIEFLY?

07:22:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.

07:22:03 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: MR. CITRO, HE WILL BE BOUND BY THOSE

07:22:06 REGULATIONS UNDER THE RS-50.




07:22:08 AND I AS A MATTER OF PRACTICE ALWAYS COUNSEL MY CLIENTS

07:22:12 TO TRY TO BUILD ACCORDING TO THE EUCLIDEAN DISTRICT

07:22:15 BECAUSE IT'S MORE EFFICIENT, AND LESS TAXING ON RESOURCES

07:22:18 OF THE CITY, AND I DID NOT, IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION,

07:22:21 DID NOT SEE A NEED FOR PD, NO EXTRAORDINARY BOUNDARIES OR

07:22:28 TREES OR WATER BODY.

07:22:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. GRANDOFF.

07:22:35 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

07:22:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY.

07:22:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST FOR THE PURPOSES OF

07:22:38 THE RECORD FOR THIS HEARING AND OTHER HEARINGS, THAT THE

07:22:41 WRITTEN COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ARE ACCESSED TO

07:22:47 THE PUBLIC AT TAMPA.GOV/AGENDAS.

07:22:52 AND IT'S ALSO LISTED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS.

07:22:54 THANK YOU.

07:22:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:22:56 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

07:22:58 >>BILL CARLSON: JUST REAL FAST.

07:22:59 I SAW IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS THAT YOU REACHED OUT TO

07:23:01 THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND YOU SAID THAT THERE WAS

07:23:04 NO OPPOSITION.

07:23:05 DID THEY OFFICIALLY RULE ON IT?

07:23:07 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: IN FACT WE CENTS TWO NOTICES BECAUSE OF

07:23:11 THE VIRUS.

07:23:12 WE RENOTICED TWICE.




07:23:14 AND WE DID NOTICE BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL AND RECEIVED NO

07:23:17 RESPONSE.

07:23:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:23:22 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC OR ANYBODY REGISTERED TO

07:23:25 SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1?

07:23:26 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS TO SPEAK

07:23:29 ON THIS ITEM.

07:23:30 >> DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC, AILEEN?

07:23:34 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: NO.

07:23:34 THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

07:23:36 THANK YOU.

07:23:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU SO MUCH.

07:23:37 DO WE HAVE ANY MOTION TO CLOSE?

07:23:39 IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS?

07:23:41 WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.

07:23:43 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.

07:23:44 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:23:45 ANY OPPOSED?

07:23:46 COUNCILMEMBER CITRO, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER

07:23:49 1?

07:23:50 IT WOULD BE THE SECOND SUBSTITUTE ON THE AGENDA.

07:23:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.

07:24:02 [OFF MICROPHONE] FILE REZ 20-41, SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE

07:24:07 BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN

07:24:10 ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF




07:24:12 2912 WEST EUCLID AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND

07:24:16 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING

07:24:19 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY

07:24:22 TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE

07:24:26 DATE, AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF WITH

07:24:34 COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH

07:24:37 THE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 2.1 AND POLICY 2.1.2 WHICH

07:24:44 ENCOURAGES IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT ON UNDERUTILIZED SITES AND

07:24:48 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE POLICY 9.3.8 WHICH

07:24:53 REQUIRES NEW RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO BE

07:24:57 MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE TO ADJACENT AREAS.

07:25:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN

07:25:04 CITRO.

07:25:05 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

07:25:06 SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER VIERA.

07:25:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: EXCUSE ME.

07:25:10 I'M SORRY.

07:25:11 IF WE COULD TAKE THAT WITHOUT COUNCILMAN VIERA BECAUSE I

07:25:15 DON'T KNOW THAT HE'S LOGGED ON THROUGH THE VIDEO.

07:25:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER GUDES.

07:25:20 ROLL CALL VOTE.

07:25:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

07:25:23 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

07:25:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

07:25:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.




07:25:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

07:25:40 >> WE CAN BARELY HEAR YOU, COUNCILMAN VIERA.

07:25:43 >>LUIS VIERA: CAN YOU HEAR ME?

07:25:45 I WAS LOGGED ON.

07:25:49 (AUDIO FEEDBACK)

07:25:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, I CAN HEAR HIM.

07:26:00 I STILL DON'T SEE HIM ON SCREEN AND I CAN BARELY HEAR

07:26:03 HIM.

07:26:03 >>LUIS VIERA: I'M IN MY CAR.

07:26:05 I'M IN MY DRIVEWAY.

07:26:06 GIVE ME TWO MINUTES.

07:26:08 BUT, YES --

07:26:14 >>> OKAY.

07:26:15 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

07:26:16 ITEM NUMBER 4, MR. MANASSE.

07:26:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MADAM CLERK, CAN YOU CALL THE ROLL?

07:26:23 SORRY.

07:26:23 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH DINGFELDER BEING

07:26:27 ABSENT, VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.

07:26:30 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

07:26:35 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

07:26:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE.

07:26:40 >> RYAN MANASSE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

07:26:46 CAN I PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?

07:26:50 (AUDIO FEEDBACK)




07:26:53 LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU SEE IT.

07:26:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN SEE IT.

07:26:57 GO AHEAD, SIR.

07:27:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 4 IS FILE REZ-20-56.

07:27:00 THE REASON I AM SHARING MY SCREEN IS I WANTED TO GIVE YOU

07:27:03 A LITTLE BACKGROUND.

07:27:04 NOW, THIS WAS A CONTINUED REZONING.

07:27:06 IT WAS HEARD BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 12, 2020.

07:27:10 DURING THE HEARING THERE WAS DISCUSSION REGARDING THE

07:27:12 POSSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AMENDING THE SITE PLAN

07:27:15 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING TO ADJUST THE PLACEMENT

07:27:17 OF THE STRUCTURE IN AN EFFORT TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY

07:27:19 15-FOOT PROTECTIVE RADIUS TO SAVE THE NONHAZARDOUS OAK

07:27:24 TREE ON-SITE.

07:27:25 THE APPLICANT REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 11, 2021,

07:27:29 TONIGHT, TO ALLOW TIME TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

07:27:31 THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REVISED SITE PLAN WITH

07:27:34 PROPOSED STRUCTURE MODIFIED TO ALLOW ADEQUATE SPACE AND

07:27:38 PROVIDE THE NECESSARY TREE PROTECTIVE RADIUS.

07:27:40 AND WHAT I HAVE DONE HERE IS SHOWN YOU AGAIN THIS REQUEST

07:27:43 WAS RS-50 TO PD FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.

07:27:47 THERE WERE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.

07:27:49 AND THEN ON SCREEN IS THE REVISED PLAN THE APPLICANT

07:27:52 SUBMITTED TO STAFF TO SHOW THAT THE STRUCTURE WAS

07:27:56 MODIFIED TO SAVE THE 39-INCH OAK RIGHT HERE.




07:28:02 WITH THAT BEING SAID, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY

07:28:04 QUESTIONS THAT COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

07:28:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:28:10 IT'S THE SAME THING BUT EXCEPT IT SAVED THAT TREE.

07:28:14 SO ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?

07:28:16 IF NOT WE GO TO MR. COLLINS.

07:28:18 NO?

07:28:22 ANYTHING ELSE, MR. MANASSE OR WE GO RIGHT TO THE

07:28:25 APPLICANT?

07:28:26 >>RYAN MANASSE: NO, SIR, GO STRAIGHT TO THE APPLICANT.

07:28:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.

07:28:31 >>STEVE MICHELINI: REPRESENTING PETITIONER AT 3228 WEST

07:28:36 OAKELLAR.

07:28:37 I THINK --

07:28:42 >>> JUST SAY YOUR NAME AGAIN.

07:28:44 YOU WERE BRIEFLY MUTED.

07:28:46 >> STEVE MICHELINI.

07:28:48 LET ME SHOW YOU A COUPLE OF PHOTOGRAPHS REGARDING THE

07:28:51 SITE.

07:28:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF WE CAN FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE

07:28:52 RECORD, I BELIEVE THAT COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER HAS LOGGED

07:28:54 ON.

07:28:55 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, ARE YOU THERE?

07:28:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?

07:29:01 ARE YOU THERE, SIR? I SEE HIM.




07:29:05 WHAT JUST HAPPENED?

07:29:08 OKAY, YOU ARE HERE?

07:29:09 VERY GOOD.

07:29:10 AND VIERA WILL BE LOGGING ON SHORTLY.

07:29:12 GO AHEAD, MR. MICHELINI.

07:29:13 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS IS A VIEW DOWN THE STREET

07:29:17 LOOKING EASTWARD, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S EXTENSIVE

07:29:20 TREE CANOPY THAT GOES PAST THE PROPERTY AND OVER ACROSS

07:29:25 TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET.

07:29:29 THIS IS THE WEST VIEW.

07:29:32 AND THE SUBJECTS PROPERTY IS TO YOUR LEFT.

07:29:39 YOU DON'T SEE THE TREE ON THAT ONE.

07:29:41 THIS IS THE SUBJECT TREE IN THE FRONT, AND WE RELOCATED

07:29:46 THE HOUSE.

07:29:46 WE MOVED IT BACK SO THAT WE MEET THE PROTECTIVE RADIUS.

07:29:50 AND THIS TREE WILL BE SAVED.

07:29:54 THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHEAST TO THE ADJACENT NEIGHBOR,

07:30:00 SLIGHTLY TO THE EAST, AND I HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION

07:30:03 WITH THIS NEIGHBOR, FAIRLY EXTENSIVELY ALMOST ON A DAILY

07:30:07 BASIS DISCUSSING ANY CONCERNS THAT HE MIGHT HAVE, AND AS

07:30:11 A MATTER OF FACT WE MOVED THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 12

07:30:16 FEET TO 15 FEET TO TRY TO ACCOMMODATE HIS CONCERN FOR

07:30:19 ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE IN THE REAR.

07:30:24 THIS IS ONE OF THE TREES THAT'S DIRECTLY ACROSS THE

07:30:27 STREET, AND ITS CANOPY ACTUALLY COMES ACROSS TO THE SOUTH




07:30:31 SIDE OF THE STREET.

07:30:32 THIS IS ON THE NORTH.

07:30:33 AND THE CANOPY OF THAT TREE AND THIS TREE ALMOST TOUCH

07:30:40 EACH OTHER.

07:30:43 THIS IS A CLOSE-UP OF THAT SAME TREE.

07:30:47 AND AGAIN IT WILL BE SAVED.

07:30:54 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN.

07:30:55 AND IF YOU SEE, WE ARE PROVIDING THE 15 FOOT PROTECTIVE

07:30:59 RADIUS, AND THAT'S WITH THAT GRAND TREE IN THE FRONT, AND

07:31:03 THEN WE ARE PROVIDING 15 FEET IN THE BACK AND WE

07:31:06 INCREASED THAT FROM 12 FEET TO 15 FEET.

07:31:09 AGAIN, THAT WAS BASED UPON DISCUSSIONS THAT I HAD WITH

07:31:11 THE NEIGHBOR TO THE EAST.

07:31:14 THIS WAS A CONTINUED HEARING FROM NOVEMBER, AND SINCE

07:31:19 THAT TIME, THE ENGINEER, DESIGNERS, HAVE MADE THE

07:31:22 ADJUSTMENTS THAT WERE REQUESTED BY CITY STAFF.

07:31:25 WE MOVED THE HOUSE AS WAS INDICATED, AND WE NOW HAVE THE

07:31:30 SUPPORT OF BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHO FOUND IT

07:31:35 CONSISTENT AS WELL AS THE CITY STAFF.

07:31:36 IT'S A LEGAL LOT OF RECORD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES.

07:31:43 THE PROBLEM IS THAT THIS ENTIRE SUBDIVISION, THE LOTS ARE

07:31:45 ONLY 90 FEET DEEP SO YOU HAVE 50 FEET OF FRONTAGE AND 90

07:31:50 FEET OF DEPTH.

07:31:51 AND THAT'S ANOTHER REASON WHY WE ARE SEEKING SOME RELIEF

07:31:55 IN THIS REGARD, AND IT WENT FROM A PD.




07:31:57 AND I KNOW THAT YOU PREVIOUSLY HAD A QUESTION ABOUT WHY

07:32:00 SOME OF THESE PROJECTS ARE GOING TO PD.

07:32:03 YOU COULDN'T MEET THE RS-50 DESIGNATION BECAUSE YOU DON'T

07:32:07 HAVE 5,000 SQUARE FEET, ALTHOUGH YOU DO HAVE THE

07:32:11 RESIDENTIAL 10 CLASSIFICATION FOR LAND USE.

07:32:15 YOU CAN'T MEET SOME OF THE OTHER CRITERIA FOR

07:32:18 DEVELOPMENT.

07:32:22 WE HAVE GONE THROUGH A NUMBER OF REITERATIONS ON THIS,

07:32:26 AND I NEED TO GO OVER A FEW ISSUES REGARDING WHAT

07:32:31 CONCEPTS THAT ARE IN THE CODE THAT WE ARE MEETING.

07:32:36 AND I THINK YOU HAVE ALREADY SEEN -- I CAN SHOW YOU -- I

07:32:43 CAN SHOW YOU THE PLAT WHERE ALL OF THESE LOTS ARE 90 FEET

07:32:47 OR 92 FEET DEPENDING ON WHERE THEY ARE IN THE ARC OF THE

07:32:52 CURVE, BUT THEY ARE VERY SHALLOW.

07:32:57 THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS TO PROMOTE THE EFFICIENCY

07:33:00 SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE, AND WITH

07:33:04 CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE

07:33:08 NATURAL HE WILL ELEMENTS, AND WE ARE DOING THAT BY

07:33:12 PROVIDING FOR THE SAFETY AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE

07:33:14 IMPACTED GRAND TREE.

07:33:16 WE ARE NOT GOING TO INTRODUCE A NEW DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.

07:33:19 IT ALREADY EXISTS.

07:33:20 THESE ARE RELATIVELY NARROW LOTS ALL UP AND DOWN THE

07:33:23 STREET.

07:33:23 AND I SHOW YOU THE PICTURES THAT DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE'S




07:33:27 REDEVELOPMENT GOING ON IN THIS AREA, AND THE LOTS ARE

07:33:31 ALL, AS I SAID, FAIRLY NARROW.

07:33:33 ENCOURAGE THE FLEXIBLE LAND DEVELOPMENT WHICH REDUCES

07:33:36 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS, COULD BE CONSERVES ENERGY,

07:33:39 MAXIMIZES THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES, AND THE

07:33:43 EXISTING UTILITIES.

07:33:44 SO ALL OF THAT IS TRUE IN THIS CASE, AND WE'LL BE

07:33:49 ACCESSING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES ON OAKELLAR.

07:33:54 PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT MUCH APPROPRIATE IN

07:33:58 LOCATION AND CHARACTER COMPATIBLE TO THE SURROUNDING

07:34:02 NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:34:02 WE ARE PROVIDING THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THAT

07:34:04 ALREADY EXISTS HERE.

07:34:05 IT'S A VACANT LOT.

07:34:07 AND WE WILL BE IN FILLING THAT IN THE PROPOSAL TO BUILD A

07:34:11 NEW HOUSE.

07:34:12 THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND ELEMENTS THAT WOULD

07:34:15 COMPLEMENT THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, WE HAVE PROVIDED

07:34:17 ELEVATIONS WHICH SHOW THAT IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO

07:34:22 THE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT ALREADY EXIST THERE, EXCEPT

07:34:24 FOR THE OTHER HOMES, THE SMALLER OLDER HOMES THAT ARE NOW

07:34:28 BEING TORN DOWN AND NEW HOMES ARE BEING BUILT.

07:34:33 THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND

07:34:35 THEREFORE WE ARE NOT SEEKING ANY WAIVERS, AND THE WAIVERS

07:34:41 IF ALLOWED WOULD NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH OTHERS




07:34:44 SO AGAIN WE ARE NOT SEEKING WAIVERS AND THE WAIVER IS IN

07:34:49 HARMONY, WE HAVE NO WAIVERS.

07:34:50 SO WE ARE ASKING FOR RELIEF ON THE SETBACKS, AND WE

07:34:55 NORMALLY WOULD BE 25 FEET AND 20 FEET.

07:34:59 WE ARE ACCOMMODATING THE GRAND TREE, THE 39-INCH GRAND

07:35:02 LIVE OAK, AND IT'S LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD.

07:35:06 AND WE HAVE MOVED THE HOUSE BACK SO THAT WE CAN SAVE THAT

07:35:10 TREE.

07:35:12 I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BUT

07:35:14 WE HAVE DONE AS STAFF HAS REQUESTED, AND WE HAVE NO

07:35:18 OBJECTIONS, AND WE HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT BY

07:35:20 BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF.

07:35:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?

07:35:30 VERY GOOD.

07:35:30 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON

07:35:33 ITEM NUMBER 4?

07:35:35 DO WE HAVE ANY REGISTERED?

07:35:36 >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.

07:35:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS ANYBODY IN PERSON ON THE SECOND

07:35:40 FLOOR, AILEEN?

07:35:42 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.

07:35:43 WE DO HAVE ONE PUBLIC SPEAKER.

07:35:46 HE HAS BEEN SWORN IN.

07:35:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS

07:35:50 ITEM, HERE IN PERSON ON THE SECOND FLOOR, PLEASE APPROACH




07:35:53 THE LECTERN AND STATE YOUR NAME.

07:35:59 AFTER EACH SPEAKER WE ARE GOING TO DISINFECT THE LECTERN

07:36:02 JUST FOR EVERYONE'S SAFETY.

07:36:04 >>THE CLERK: AND CORRECTION, WE DO HAVE TWO REGISTERED

07:36:08 SPEAKERS.

07:36:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE DO HAVE TWO REGISTERED.

07:36:11 WE'LL GO TO THE IN-PERSON AND THEN GO TO THE REGISTERED.

07:36:14 YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.

07:36:15 STATE YOUR NAME.

07:36:15 >> MY NAME IS CHARLES GODDARD.

07:36:20 MY WIFE AND I SHOW PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH OF LOT 15.

07:36:24 WE SHARE BOUNDARY.

07:36:25 LET'S TRY TO GET A FEW THINGS STRAIGHT.

07:36:27 THIS WHOLE NOTION THAT LOT 15 IS SOMEHOW UNIQUE IS

07:36:31 MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE.

07:36:32 IF YOU LOOK TO PAGE 4 OF THE STAFF REPORT, AND I QUOTE,

07:36:35 IT SAYS THE REAR SETBACK WAS ADJUSTED FOR THE REDUCED

07:36:38 LOCALITY LENGTH MUCH 90 FEET.

07:36:40 THIS ISN'T A REDUCED LOT LENGTH.

07:36:42 IT'S THE SAME WIDTH AND LENGTH AS EVERY OTHER LOT SOUTH

07:36:45 OF COACHMAN AND NORTH OF VILLA ROSA.

07:36:47 THE PLOTTED OF RECORD THAT YOU JUST SAW SHOWS THAT.

07:36:50 A SMALL LOT DOESN'T JUSTIFY A SETBACK.

07:36:52 IF ANYTHING, IT EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING

07:36:55 SETBACKS INTACT.




07:36:57 SETBACKS CREATE PRIVACY, AND PRIVACY IS WHAT DEFINES THE

07:37:01 CHARACTER OF BAYSHORE BEAUTIFUL.

07:37:03 NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY 1.1.2-B OBLIGATES THIS PANEL TO

07:37:08 REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO RESPECT THE EXISTING

07:37:10 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:37:13 NO RESIDENTS ON OUR BLOCK HAS A 15-FOOT SETBACK.

07:37:17 I THINK THAT'S WORTH REPEATING.

07:37:19 NO RESIDENTS ON OUR BLOCK HAS A 15-FOOT SETBACK.

07:37:22 EVEN THE TWO NEW DEVELOPMENTS RIGHT NEXT DOOR WERE

07:37:26 PRESERVED AT 20 AND 23 FEET RESPECTIVELY.

07:37:29 LOOKING AGAIN TO PAGE HAD 4 OF THE STAFF REPORT, NATURAL

07:37:32 RESOURCES ONLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE FRONT OF THE

07:37:34 STRUCTURE BE MOVED BACK, NOT THE ENTIRE HOUSE.

07:37:38 THE WAY THIS REZONING REQUEST HAS BEEN FRAMED REDUCED THE

07:37:42 REAR SETBACK TO SAVE THE TREE BECAUSE IT'S A SMALL LOT.

07:37:46 THAT'S A FALSE DILEMMA, AND I THINK THE COUNCIL GETS THAT

07:37:49 BASED ON THEIR COMMENTS AT THE LAST MEETING.

07:37:51 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA RECOGNIZED THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE TREE.

07:37:54 THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE LOT.

07:37:55 THE PROBLEM IS THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE.

07:37:57 COUNCILMAN CITRO CALLED IT TEN POUNDS OF MUD IN A FIVE

07:38:01 POUND SACK.

07:38:02 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD AND SAID

07:38:04 OKAY, YOU CAN DO A PD, BUT MAKE IT CONSISTENT WITH THE

07:38:06 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.




07:38:08 THAT'S NOT WHAT PETITIONER DID.

07:38:10 HERE WE ARE FOUR MONTHS LATER AND THE NEW SITE PLAN IS

07:38:12 STILL INCONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, INCONSISTENT

07:38:15 WITH TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND SPOT ZONE McMANSION

07:38:21 TOWERING OVER MY KIDS' PAL LOOKING INTO THE LIVING ROOM.

07:38:25 YOU ALSO HEARD THE DISTINGUISHED ENGINEERING EXPERT

07:38:29 RICHARD DIAZ WHO SAID THE REAR SETBACK IS GOING TO CAUSE

07:38:33 SIGNIFICANT FLOODING IN MY YARD AND THE EAST LIP

07:38:35 NEIGHBOR'S YARD.

07:38:36 WHAT ABOUT THAT?

07:38:37 LOOK, I'M PROTECTIVE OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN MY

07:38:39 NEIGHBORHOOD, AS WE ALL SHOULD BE.

07:38:41 THIS ISN'T DC.

07:38:42 THIS ISN'T NEW YORK CITY.

07:38:43 THIS IS OLD FLORIDA.

07:38:44 THERE'S A REASON THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CALLED BAYSHORE

07:38:47 BEAUTIFUL.

07:38:48 THERE'S A REASON OUR BLOCK IS CALLED OAKELLAR.

07:38:51 BUT YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT AWAY?

07:38:53 WHY?

07:38:54 PETITIONER, HE'S NOT GOING TO BE MY NEIGHBOR.

07:38:58 THIS REZONING REQUEST IS ABOUT ONE THING AND WE ALL KNOW

07:39:01 IT.

07:39:01 (MOTION CARRIED)

07:39:02 WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, THAT'S NOT THE STANDARD FOR A




07:39:05 REZONING.

07:39:07 LET'S ALL TRY TO DO THE RIGHT THING TONIGHT.

07:39:09 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

07:39:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

07:39:12 I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE ONE PERSON INDIVIDUAL HERE IN

07:39:16 PERSON.

07:39:17 THERE ARE TWO REGISTERED SPEAKERS ONLINE.

07:39:20 MADAM CLERK, IF WE CAN BRING THEM ON.

07:39:23 I SEE A MR. DIAZ, AND DO WE HAVE ANOTHER SPEAKER AND ONCE

07:39:30 WE GET ANOTHER PERSON ON THE SCREEN WE'LL HAVE YOU RAISE

07:39:34 YOUR RIGHT HAND.

07:39:35 >> MR. METCALF IS LOGGED ON.

07:39:39 HOWEVER, HE'S ON HIS CELL PHONE AND NOT ABLE TO ENABLE

07:39:42 HIS VIDEO.

07:39:44 HE DOS DOES 2021 SPEAK BUT I NOTIFIED HIM HE HAS TO

07:39:47 ENABLE HIS VIDEO IN ORDER TO SPEAK.

07:39:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.

07:39:50 WE HAVE TO HAVE VIDEO.

07:39:51 WE HAVE TO SEE YOUR FACE IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK.

07:39:54 SO MR. DIAZ, I SEE YOU ON.

07:39:57 IF YOU WOULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.

07:39:59 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).

07:40:01 >> I DO.

07:40:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, MR. DIAZ.

07:40:07 YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.




07:40:08 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.

07:40:09 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.

07:40:13 MY NAME IS RICHARD DIAZ.

07:40:15 AND I OWN AND LIVE AT THE HOME ACROSS THE STREET, 3225

07:40:19 WEST OAKELLAR.

07:40:20 AND TONIGHT I AM SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OF THIS PETITION.

07:40:24 MY OPPOSITION FOCUSES ON SEVERAL FOLLOWING POINTS.

07:40:28 THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED BASICALLY DOESN'T DIFFER

07:40:33 MUCH FROM THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN.

07:40:34 HOWEVER IT CONTAINS SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES AND

07:40:36 INCONSISTENCIES.

07:40:38 FOR EXAMPLE, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 15-FOOT REAR YARD

07:40:41 SETBACK, TESTS ON THE SITE PLAN CLAIM A -- REAR YARD

07:40:46 SETBACK.

07:40:47 THE SITE PLAN CALLS FOR THE REMOVAL OF SEVERAL TREES

07:40:52 SHOWN IN THE GRAY HATCHED AREA ON THE PLAN WITHIN THE

07:40:56 FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING.

07:40:57 HOWEVER, THE ACTUAL PLAN CALLS FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL OF

07:41:00 THE TREES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE 39-INCH GRAND OAK.

07:41:04 THAT GRAND OAK HAS BEEN REPRESENTED IN SOME WAY AS A

07:41:08 COMPROMISE SOLUTION BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE CITY.

07:41:12 HOWEVER, THAT GRAND OAK HAS NEVER BEEN SCHEDULED FOR

07:41:15 REMOVAL.

07:41:16 THE CITY HAS CLAIMED IT'S A HEALTHY TREE, AND THERE'S

07:41:20 NEVER BEEN ANY IDEA ON THE CITY'S BEHALF THAT THE TREE




07:41:23 COULD EVER BE REMOVED.

07:41:25 SO THE CONCEPT OF A COMPROMISE IS MISSING HERE.

07:41:28 THAT TREE HAS ALWAYS NEEDED TO REMAIN AS IS ON THE PLAN.

07:41:33 THE PD CALLED FOR REMOVAL OF ALL THE TREES AND HAS A

07:41:38 10-TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENT IN THE TREE TABLE.

07:41:42 YET THERE'S NO ROOM LITERALLY ON THE PLAN TO PLANT

07:41:45 ANYTHING IN RESPONSE TO THE MITIGATION OF TREES.

07:41:52 WHATEVER THE REAR YARD SETBACK IS, IF IT'S GOING TO BE 15

07:41:55 FEET OR 12 FEET, HAS BEEN STATED BEFORE.

07:41:58 THAT'S TOTALLY INCONSISTENT AND INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE

07:42:02 NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:42:04 COUNCIL MEMBERS, JUST 300 PLATTED LOTS IN THE OAKELLAR

07:42:08 SUBDIVISION, MANY IF NOT ALL ARE OCCUPIED.

07:42:13 THERE'S MANY HOUSES THAT HAVE TWO LOTS, AND INDEED THERE

07:42:16 MAY BE A FEW VACANT LOTS BUT MOST OF THEM ARE OCCUPIED

07:42:20 AND ALL ONE HAS TO DO IS LOOK AT THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

07:42:23 AND YOU WILL SEE THE REAR YARD HAVING ALIGN MEASURING

07:42:27 ABOUT 20 FEET TO ALL REAR YARDS.

07:42:32 THAT'S CONSISTENCY IN THE SUBDIVISION, AND THAT'S

07:42:34 INCONSISTENT WITH THIS PETITION.

07:42:37 THERE'S BENSON DISCUSSION ABOUT THE HARDSHIP AND HOW THE

07:42:41 PETITIONER HAS TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM 25 TO 23 FRONT

07:42:47 AND IT'S CLAIMING THE NEED TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD

07:42:50 SETBACK FOR SOME UNIQUENESS, CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS LOT.

07:42:55 COUNCIL MEMBERS, THERE IS NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT THIS LOT,




07:42:59 50 FEET WIDE, 92 SOME FEET DEEP, JUST LIKE ALL THE

07:43:02 OTHERS.

07:43:03 THE REASON THAT THIS IS A PD AND THE REASON THAT

07:43:06 PETITIONER NEEDS SOME RELIEF IS THAT HE WANTS TO BUILD A

07:43:09 MASSIVE HOUSE.

07:43:11 AND IF THE HOUSE WERE SMALLER, THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY NEED

07:43:14 FOR THESE REDUCED SETBACKS.

07:43:15 [BELL SOUNDS]

07:43:17 THE FACT THAT THE PETITIONER IS REQUESTING THIS IS

07:43:22 SOMEHOW CONNECTED, HIS REQUEST SUDDENLY FOR RELIEF BY THE

07:43:26 CITY SO HE CAN HAVE A PROFITABLE VENTURE.

07:43:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

07:43:30 >> COUNCIL MEMBERS, THE CITY IS NOT IN AN ENTERPRISE TO

07:43:34 GRANT RELIEF OR BAIL OUT A PETITIONER.

07:43:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

07:43:41 THANK YOU.

07:43:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY.

07:43:43 I WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT COUNCILMEMBER VIERA

07:43:47 JOINED THE MEETING A WHILE AGO AND HAS BEEN PARTICIPATING

07:43:51 IN THIS --

07:43:52 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

07:43:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.

07:43:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMEMBER DINGFELDER.

07:43:57 IT LOOKED LIKE YOU HAD A QUESTION.

07:43:59 ANYTHING, SIR?




07:44:00 NO?

07:44:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, I DID HAVE A QUESTION FOR

07:44:07 STAFF, BUT I WASN'T SURE MR. DIAZ WAS FINISHED.

07:44:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT WAS IT.

07:44:15 HIS TIME WAS UP.

07:44:18 >> THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY.

07:44:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.

07:44:20 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

07:44:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, MR. DIAZ, BEFORE YOU TUNE OUT,

07:44:26 SO WHERE IS THE YOUR PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THIS ONE?

07:44:30 >> ACROSS THE STREET CATTY-CORNER.

07:44:35 MY HOME WAS IN ONE OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WAS BRIEFLY

07:44:38 SHOWN WHERE THE OAK TREE OVERHANGING THE ROADWAY.

07:44:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PROFESSIONALLY, YOU ARE WHAT?

07:44:46 >> I'M A CIVIL ENGINEER, AND I HAVE DEALT WITH HUNDREDS

07:44:50 OF SITE PLANS VERY SIMILAR TO THIS IN THE DESIGN OF

07:44:53 SUBDIVISIONS THROUGHOUT TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.

07:44:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND YOU TESTIFIED EARLIER IN REGARD

07:45:01 TO THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION.

07:45:05 DID YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO EVALUATE THE REAR YARD SETBACK

07:45:10 UP AND DOWN YOUR STREET IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD?

07:45:13 >> WELL, I HAVE DONE THAT CASUALLY.

07:45:16 MR. DINGFELDER, I CAN TELL YOU, I KNOW OF NO OTHER

07:45:19 HOMES -- 12 OR 15-FOOT REAR YARD.

07:45:25 THERE'S QUITE --




07:45:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MORE TYPICAL?

07:45:28 >> THERE'S MORE CONSISTENCY WITH 20-FOOT REAR YARD.

07:45:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN THE

07:45:33 NEIGHBORHOOD?

07:45:34 >> I HAVE LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR TWO YEARS.

07:45:37 HOWEVER, I GREW UP IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:45:40 AND I REMEMBER PLAYING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD PROBABLY 65

07:45:45 YEARS AGO.

07:45:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

07:45:51 THANK YOU.

07:45:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANKS VERY MUCH.

07:45:55 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

07:45:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I JUST WANTED SOME CLARITY FROM

07:46:02 STAFF.

07:46:03 RYAN, MR. MICHELINI INDICATED THAT YOUR STAFF REPORT HAD

07:46:07 CHANGED?

07:46:08 IS THAT CORRECT?

07:46:11 WHAT'S THE DEAL ON THAT?

07:46:12 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

07:46:13 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, NO -- EXCUSE ME?

07:46:19 OKAY.

07:46:21 NO, THIS HAS NOT CHANGED.

07:46:23 THE CHANGE WAS TO THE REVISED PLAN THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT

07:46:25 FIRST READING, AND THAT WAS PREVIOUS FROM THE 11-12 MUST

07:46:29 BE HEARING.




07:46:30 AND THEN WHAT MR. MICHELINI SHOWED WAS THE REVISED PLAN

07:46:33 TO SAVE THAT 39-INCH TREE.

07:46:36 OTHER THAN THAT, THE STAFF REPORT REMAINED THE SAME AT

07:46:40 FIRST READING THAT WAS PRESENTED.

07:46:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.

07:46:44 AND EITHER RYAN OR MR. MICHELINI, WHAT IS THE TOTAL

07:46:50 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THIS HOUSE THAT'S BEING PROPOSED IN THE

07:46:52 PD?

07:46:53 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I'M HAVING A LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN TO

07:47:10 SEE.

07:47:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND PERHAPS OF GREATER RELEVANCE,

07:47:22 WHAT IS THE FOOTPRINT, THE FIRST FLOOR FOOTPRINT?

07:47:25 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I CAN SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN IF YOU

07:47:29 WANT ME TO PUT THAT ON.

07:47:30 BUT I CAN'T --

07:47:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN ANYBODY READ THE DIMENSION ON IT?

07:47:37 >> IT'S NOT A LARGE HOME.

07:47:38 I MEAN, IT'S NOT A MONSTROSITY.

07:47:50 IT'S KIND OF SMALL.

07:47:51 I CAN'T READ IT BUT I CAN PUT IT ON HERE.

07:47:53 >> COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, I CAN SAY FOR THE RECORD

07:47:59 THERE'S A SETBACK, 17 ON THE SIDE, 15 ON THE REAR, 20 IN

07:48:03 THE FRONT.

07:48:07 AND THEN MR. MICHELINI MAY KNOW A LITTLE MORE ABOUT THE

07:48:10 ELEVATIONS.




07:48:11 BUT THE TOTAL SIDE AREA IS 4,537 SQUARE FEET.

07:48:17 BUT THE HEIGHT OF 35 FEET, THE ACTUAL SQUARE FEET OF THE

07:48:24 HOUSE.

07:48:25 AND I DEFER TO THE APPLICANT FOR EXACTLY HOW MANY SQUARE

07:48:28 FEET HE'S REFERRING TO AS THE PD OUTLINED.

07:48:32 >>STEVE MICHELINI: PART OF THAT, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER,

07:48:35 WAS REDUCED BECAUSE WE REDUCED THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM

07:48:40 12 TO 15 FEET.

07:48:42 AND CERTAINLY IT'S A PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS,

07:48:46 WE WILL CORRECT THAT DISCREPANCY.

07:48:47 I DIDN'T SEE WHAT SAID 12 FEET ON THE DATA TABLE.

07:48:52 BUT OUR INTENTION WAS TO MAKE IT 15 FEET.

07:48:54 WE HAVE TALKED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER IMMEDIATELY TO THE

07:48:57 EAST, AND THAT WAS MR. METCALF, AND I SPENT A GREAT DEAL

07:49:05 OF TIME TALKING WITH HIM, AND ASKED HIM TO PASS ON THE

07:49:08 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE OTHER NEIGHBORS.

07:49:12 OUR INTENTION WAS TO PLACE NEW PRIVACY FENCES ON THE

07:49:17 EAST-WEST AND SOUTH.

07:49:20 AND AS WELL TO LANDSCAPE, THE END OF THE REAR YARD SO

07:49:27 THAT IT WOULD NOT BE INTRUSIVE TO EITHER OF THOSE THREE

07:49:30 NEIGHBORS.

07:49:33 SO, I MEAN, WE CAN GO BACK INTO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

07:49:37 STAFF, AND REPORT, I MEAN, EVERYTHING INCLUDING THEIR

07:49:42 REPORT AND THE CITY REPORT SAYS IT'S CONSISTENT.

07:49:44 AND THEY SAY THAT THEY FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE




07:49:46 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:49:48 I'M READING FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT.

07:49:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY LAST QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, IS

07:49:59 WHAT IS THE COMPELLING REASON TO HAVING THE REAR YARD A

07:50:04 FEW YARDS SETBACK CONTRARY TO THE CITY CODE?

07:50:11 YOU SAID THERE'S NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.

07:50:14 THAT'S A 5-FOOT WAIVER FROM THE STANDARD CITY CODE.

07:50:18 AND I AM NOT REALLY HEARING WHAT THE COMPELLING REASON

07:50:21 WAS.

07:50:22 BUT YOU HAD A TREE ISSUE.

07:50:26 I'M SURE EVERYBODY APPRECIATES YOU ALL SAVING THE TREE.

07:50:29 BUT WHAT IS THE COMPELLING NEED, THE COMPELLING REASON TO

07:50:33 GO TO THE REAR?

07:50:36 YOU COULD HAVE A SMALLER HOUSE, IF YOU HAVE A SMALLER

07:50:39 FOOTPRINT FOR THAT HOUSE.

07:50:42 NOBODY IS ABLE TO TELL ME HOW MANY SQUARE FEET THIS HOUSE

07:50:44 IS.

07:50:45 BUT WHATEVER IT IS, IT COULD BE SMALLER, AND THEN APPLY

07:50:49 BY THE REAR YARD SETBACK.

07:50:51 I HAVE A FEELING NOBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD REALLY

07:50:52 BE HERE.

07:50:53 >>STEVE MICHELINI: WELL, WE REDUCED THE R AND PUSHED THE

07:50:58 HOUSE BACK IN THE FRONT TO ACCOMMODATE THE 39-INCH OAK.

07:51:01 AND WE ALSO INCREASED THE SETBACK TO THE REAR FROM 12

07:51:05 FEET TO 15 FEET.




07:51:06 SO THEN WE SQUEEZED THE HOUSE IN TWO DIRECTIONS.

07:51:10 SO THE REDUCTION AND THE REQUEST FOR THE REAR YARD

07:51:17 SETBACK, THAT'S NOT A WAIVER TO A TECHNICAL STANDARD.

07:51:20 THAT'S A REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION IN THE SETBACK BASED

07:51:23 UPON THE PROXIMITY OF THE TREES THAT WERE BEING SAVED --

07:51:28 OR THE GRAND OAK IN THE FRONT.

07:51:34 WE HAVE SQUEEZED THE HOUSE IN TWO DIRECTIONS.

07:51:37 I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS MAY

07:51:39 HAVE A CONCERN WITH THAT, BUT I DON'T THINK ANYONE CAN

07:51:42 TESTIFY TO THE ACCURACY THAT ALL OF THE OTHER PROPERTIES

07:51:47 HAVE A 20-FOOT SETBACK IN THE REAR.

07:51:50 THEY CAN'T SAY THAT UNLESS THEY HAVE HAD A SURVEY DONE,

07:51:53 AND I KNOW EYEBALLING THINGS SOMETIMES IS MISLEADING.

07:51:58 BUT THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL, IF YOU LOOK IN THE FRONT,

07:52:06 THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL 10 FEET BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE

07:52:09 PROPERTY LINE AND THE EDGE OF THE PAVEMENT, AND THERE'S 5

07:52:14 FEET IN FRONT BEFORE YOU GET TO THE EDGE OF THE PAVEMENT.

07:52:18 SO THERE'S MORE SPACE IN THE FRONT.

07:52:22 AND AS FAR AS FLOODING IS CONCERNED,

07:52:25 IT'S A TECHNICAL STANDARD THAT'S NOT WAIVABLE, SO YOU

07:52:29 HAVE TO MEET THE CODE, YOU HAVE TO RETAIN THE WATER ON

07:52:31 YOUR SITE, YOU CAN'T DUMP WATER ON SOMEONE'S ADJACENT

07:52:34 OWNER'S PROPERTY.

07:52:38 I MEAN CONSIDERING THE NARROWNESS OF THE -- I'M SORRY,

07:52:41 THE DEPTH THAT IS ONLY 90 FEET, THAT'S AN EXTREMELY




07:52:45 DIFFICULT THRESHOLD TO MEET.

07:52:50 ANYWAY, LIKE I SAID, IN DISCUSSION WAS MR. METCALF, WHO

07:52:54 WAS THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST, WE TOLD HIM THAT, YOU

07:53:00 KNOW, WE WOULD REDUCE THAT AGAIN TO 15 FEET.

07:53:04 I'M NOT SAYING HE WAS 100% HAPPY WITH IT BUT HE WAS

07:53:07 HAPPIER THAN HE WAS WITH THE 12 FEET.

07:53:09 AND THEN WHEN WE PROPOSED REPLACING THE FENCES AND

07:53:13 PUTTING IN NEW PRIVACY FENCE WAS LANDSCAPING AROUND, TO

07:53:17 PROVIDE THAT PRIVACY IN THE REAR, HE WAS HAPPIER WITH

07:53:24 THAT AS WELL.

07:53:26 WE ALSO, AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO PUT THE SIDEWALK IN,

07:53:29 ALTHOUGH THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS IN THAT AREA.

07:53:32 BUT WE STILL HAVE TO BUILD A SIDEWALK IN THE FRONT.

07:53:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.

07:53:39 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:53:40 ANYBODY ELSE?

07:53:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMAINDER THAT IF YOU HAVE

07:53:45 QUESTIONS, THAT YOU NEED TO ASK -- [INDISCERNIBLE]

07:53:54 >>> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

07:53:58 (AUDIO FEEDBACK)

07:54:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MICHELINI, MR. DINGFELDER MADE A

07:54:07 COMMENT IN REFERENCE TO THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE.

07:54:16 WITH THE SETBACK.

07:54:17 SO IF THE HOUSE WERE DOWNSIZED, IF THE HOUSE WAS

07:54:23 DOWNSIZED, IT WOULD MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS AND YOU




07:54:28 WOULDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANYTHING.

07:54:29 WOULD YOU AGREE?

07:54:30 >>STEVE MICHELINI: IF THE HOUSE WERE DOWNSIZED, YOU IN

07:54:36 ANY REAR YARD SETBACK?

07:54:38 >> IF THE HOUSE WAS SMALLER TO WHERE YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO

07:54:41 WORRY ABOUT THAT BACKYARD.

07:54:42 THAT SEEMS WHAT THE CONCERN IS AT THIS PARTICULAR POINT,

07:54:46 THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PATTERN OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE

07:54:51 PLATS.

07:54:51 IT WOULD BE OUT OF BALANCE.

07:54:52 >>STEVE MICHELINI: WELL, WHEN I ADDRESSED THAT A MINUTE

07:54:56 AGO, THERE'S A PERCEPTION APPARENTLY THAT THERE ARE OTHER

07:54:59 HOUSES ALL MEET THE 20-FOOT SETBACK.

07:55:02 I DON'T HAVE ANY WAY OF KNOWING THAT.

07:55:04 AND AS I SAID, WITHOUT A SURVEY, NOBODY ELSE KNOWS THAT

07:55:07 THAT'S ACCURATE EITHER.

07:55:08 I'M NOT SAYING IT IS NOT.

07:55:09 I'M JUST SAYING THAT WHEN WE DEALT WITH THIS SITE AND

07:55:13 PUSHED THE HOUSE BACK, WE REDUCED THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE

07:55:17 IN THE FRONT AND THE REAR, SO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE HAS

07:55:21 CHANGED FROM WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY BEING PROPOSED.

07:55:25 THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL 5 FEET IN THE FRONT THAT WAS

07:55:28 TAKEN OFF, AND THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL 3 FEET IN THE

07:55:31 REAR.

07:55:31 SO BUT WE HAVE REDUCED THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE.




07:55:36 AND THE LOT IS ONLY 4500 SQUARE FEET.

07:55:40 SO I THINK THAT WE HAVE DONE THE BEST THAT WE CAN DO WITH

07:55:45 THIS.

07:55:47 PART OF THE ISSUE THAT YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH -- AND I

07:55:49 KNOW THAT THEY MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT, WELL, YOU HAVE

07:55:51 TO HAVE A HARDSHIP REGARDING THE WAIVERS.

07:55:55 THERE AREN'T ANY WAIVERS, SO WE DIDN'T HAVE TO MEET THOSE

07:55:58 CRITERIA. WE HAD TO MEET THE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR

07:56:01 DEVELOPMENT, AND WHICH AS I SAID BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION

07:56:05 AND THAN THE CITY STAFF FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE.

07:56:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.

07:56:13 >>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

07:56:14 >> I HAVE A COMMENT IF I MAY.

07:56:21 THERE'S PLENTY OF ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE --

07:56:25 >>> NO, SIR, YOUR TIME STOP TO SPEAK --

07:56:28 >> MY APOLOGIES.

07:56:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.

07:56:32 DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?

07:56:35 DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?

07:56:36 MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.

07:56:38 DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.

07:56:40 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:56:42 AYE.

07:56:42 WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL FOR ITEM NUMBER 4, WHICH

07:56:46 HAS A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED?




07:56:57 COUNCILMAN GUDES, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE THIS ONE?

07:57:00 COUNCILMAN CARLSON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE THIS ONE?

07:57:03 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE THIS ONE?

07:57:09 ITEM NUMBER 4?

07:57:12 OKAY.

07:57:14 IT'S REZ 20-56.

07:57:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NUMBER 4, COUNCILMAN.

07:57:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

07:57:23 OKAY.

07:57:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE BEING

07:57:28 PRESENTED.

07:57:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM GOING TO MOVE TO DENY REZ 20-56,

07:57:39 THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3228 OAKELLAR, THE APPLICANT

07:57:47 NAILED TO MEET HIS BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT,

07:57:49 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AS A CONDITION

07:57:52 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE

07:57:56 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE.

07:58:05 TELEPHONE SPECIFICALLY, I THINK THE PETITIONER FAILED TO

07:58:08 COMPLY WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES IN THE PLAN IN REGARDS

07:58:12 TO THE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE

07:58:15 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, 27-136, SPECIFICALLY THAT THEY

07:58:23 FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THAT SECTION IN REGARD TO THE FACT

07:58:28 THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT

07:58:33 ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S PROMOTE IN THIS LOCATION,

07:58:35 CHARACTER, COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING




07:58:37 NEIGHBORHOOD AS IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.

07:58:40 THIS PETITIONER HAS BEEN GIVEN AMPLE OPPORTUNITY TO AT

07:58:47 LEAST TWO OR THREE HEARINGS TO MODIFY HIS SITE PLAN, TO

07:58:50 BE MORE CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING

07:58:54 NEIGHBORHOOD, MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE REAR YARD.

07:58:58 THEY ARE ASKING FOR RELIEF IN THE REAR YARD.

07:59:03 OUR CODE AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIFICALLY AS THE

07:59:08 TESTIMONY, UNCONTROVERTED TESTIMONY HAS STATED, IS

07:59:11 TYPICALLY 20 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK AND THEY ARE ASKING

07:59:14 FOR 15.

07:59:15 I BELIEVE AS STATED TO THE PETITIONER THAT THIS COULD

07:59:20 HAVE BEEN CURED WITH A SMALLER FOOTPRINT, AND THEREFORE

07:59:25 TO SHRINK THAT REAR YARD BACK TO 20 FEET.

07:59:28 AND IN LIGHT OF THE ENACT THIS HASN'T BEEN DONE, I'LL

07:59:32 MOVE TO DENY.

07:59:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN

07:59:35 DINGFELDER, SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON.

07:59:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

07:59:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

07:59:43 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

07:59:44 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

07:59:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

07:59:49 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

07:59:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

07:59:51 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.




07:59:53 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I HAVE A QUESTION, COUNCIL, THAT IS

07:59:56 CORRECT IF WE CAN REVISE THE SITE PLAN FOR A 20-FOOT REAR

07:59:59 SETBACK, WOULD WE BE ABLE TO DO THAT AND COME BACK TO

08:00:02 YOU?

08:00:03 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY

08:00:05 COUNCIL ATTORNEY.

08:00:06 NO, THE COUNCIL HAS TAKEN ACTION, SIR.

08:00:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.

08:00:12 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:00:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. SHELBY.

08:00:23 >> YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:00:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WONDERFUL

08:00:28 IF MR. MICHELINI IN THAT REGARD -- BEFORE I MADE THE

08:00:33 MOTION BUT BEFORE WE TOOK THE VOTE.

08:00:34 BUT MY QUESTION PROCEDURALLY TO MS. WELLS AND MR. SHELBY,

08:00:38 PROBABLY MR. SHELBY BECAUSE IT'S MORE PROCEDURALLY, IS IF

08:00:43 WE WANT TO DO SOME SORT OF RECONSIDERATION, SINCE WE ARE

08:00:49 ALL ON THE PREVAILING SIDE OF THIS VOTE, YOU KNOW, I

08:00:53 GUESS THAT IS A POSSIBILITY FOR THIS COUNCIL.

08:00:56 IS IT NOT?

08:00:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT IS NOT CORRECT.

08:00:59 RULE 6-I OF YOUR RULES OF PROCEDURE STATE SPECIFICALLY

08:01:05 QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO RECONSIDERATION

08:01:07 EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY CITY CODE.

08:01:09 AND I BELIEVE THE CITY CODE IS SILENT AS TO THAT.




08:01:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

08:01:14 I STAND CORRECTED.

08:01:15 I APPRECIATE IT.

08:01:17 MR. MICHELINI, I'M SORRY, BUT TOO LITTLE TOO LATE.

08:01:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:01:22 NEXT UP IS ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ 20-49.

08:01:27 MR. BRICKLEMYER, HE IS ON -- IS THERE ANYBODY REGISTERED

08:01:31 FOR 5 AND 6, MADAM CLERK?

08:01:36 >>THE CLERK: I HAVE THE APPLICANT REGISTERED AND FOR 6

08:01:41 WE HAVE ALL THE APPLICANTS AS WELL AS SUPPORT.

08:01:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.

08:01:45 SO MR. BRICKLEMYER IS VIRTUAL.

08:01:49 WE WILL BRING MR. BRICKLEMYER ON.

08:01:52 PLEASE SWEAR HIM IN.

08:02:03 AND ANYBODY ELSE IN PERSON ON THE SECOND FLOOR?

08:02:12 YOU ARE MUTED.

08:02:13 SAY THAT AGAIN?

08:02:14 GO AHEAD.

08:02:18 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: GROWTH MANAGEMENT.

08:02:19 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

08:02:21 THANK YOU.

08:02:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE LEFT ON THE

08:02:23 FLOOR?

08:02:25 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: NO, SIR.

08:02:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU SO MUCH.




08:02:28 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: YOU'RE WELCOME.

08:02:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE, GO AHEAD.

08:02:31 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

08:02:33 ITEM NUMBER 5 IS FILE REZ 20-49 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED

08:02:36 AT 2328 WEST ST. JOHN STREET AND THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU

08:02:40 IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL

08:02:43 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RM-24 MULTIFAMILY 24.

08:02:48 I'LL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT.

08:02:50 IF YOU WOULD PLEASE RETURN TO ME AFTERWARD.

08:02:53 >> SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.

08:02:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.

08:03:07 WE CAN SEE IT.

08:03:07 >> DANNY COLLINS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.

08:03:11 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

08:03:12 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,

08:03:15 AND MORE SPECIFICALLY WEST TAMPA NEIGHBORHOOD.

08:03:21 REY PARK IS THE CLOSEST PARK LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET

08:03:25 SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, 700 FEET WEST OF THE SITE ON

08:03:30 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE.

08:03:32 THE SITE IS NOT IN AN EVACUATION ZONE.

08:03:35 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

08:03:38 SURROUNDING PROPERTY, SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN THIS

08:03:41 PURPLE COLOR.

08:03:42 THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN RESIDENTIAL.

08:03:46 THERE IS SOME NONRESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL USES ON NORTH




08:03:49 ARMENIA AVENUE.

08:03:53 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

08:03:56 AGAIN, THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR.

08:03:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIR, POINT OF ORDER.

08:04:02 I AM NOT SEEING THE OVERHEAD.

08:04:04 I DON'T KNOW IF THE SCREEN HAS BEEN CLICKED ON.

08:04:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, WE SEE IT.

08:04:09 IT'S CLEAR HERE.

08:04:11 I AM SEEING THE PRESENTATION WHICH IS A COLOR CODED MAP.

08:04:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE SOMEBODY CAN -- ON THE

08:04:19 TECHNICAL SIDE CAN HELP.

08:04:24 >>> YOU CAN'T SEE IT ON YOUR SCREEN, MR. DINGFELDER?

08:04:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOT AT THIS TIME.

08:04:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: CAN COUNCILMAN VIERA SEE IT?

08:04:34 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I CAN.

08:04:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

08:04:37 THERE IT IS.

08:04:38 THANK YOU.

08:04:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, MR. COLLINS.

08:04:40 SORRY ABOUT THAT.

08:04:41 >> THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

08:04:46 THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR,

08:04:49 RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.

08:04:53 RESIDENTIAL 35, ONE BLOCK LEFT IS CC COMMERCIAL 35.

08:05:04 THIS PORTION OF THE OLD WEST TAMPA NEIGHBORHOOD IS




08:05:07 APPROPRIATE FOR A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL USES.

08:05:09 THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL TO REZONE TO RM-24 ZONING

08:05:13 DISTRICT IS BELOW WHAT IS CONSIDERED UNDER THE R-35

08:05:16 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.

08:05:18 RM-24 DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE RANGE OF HOUSING OPTIONS FOR

08:05:23 TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION.

08:05:25 SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN THE AREA OF THE CITY WITH

08:05:29 TRANSIT EMPLOYMENT, AND SUPPORTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

08:05:31 POLICIES WHICH SEEKS TO PROMOTE A COMPACT STRATEGY BY

08:05:35 PROVIDING HOUSING, DENSITIES, TRANSIT USE, AND

08:05:39 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES.

08:05:40 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS THE PLANNING STAFF FIND THE

08:05:43 REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE

08:05:45 PLAN.

08:05:45 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

08:05:47 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

08:05:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:05:51 MR. MANASSE?

08:05:53 >>RYAN MANASSE: I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE MY SCREEN.

08:05:59 NUMBER 5, REZ 20-49.

08:06:02 >> WE ARE WAITING HERE.

08:06:07 OKAY.

08:06:15 I HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE POP-UP WINDOW TO SHARE MY SCREEN

08:06:18 YET.

08:06:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COULD WE SHARE MR. MANASSE'S SCREEN,




08:06:22 PLEASE?

08:06:25 WHILE WE ARE DOING THAT, MR. BRICKLEMYER, RAISE YOUR

08:06:27 RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.

08:06:29 >>THE CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE

08:06:36 TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?

08:06:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.

08:06:42 IF YOU COULD UNMUTE YOURSELF WHEN THE TIME COMES.

08:06:44 ALL RIGHT, MR. MANASSE, WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.

08:06:48 >>RYAN MANASSE: ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ 20-49, THE APPLICANT

08:06:53 SEEKS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 2328 WEST ST. JOHN STREET

08:06:57 FROM RS 350 TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RM-24 TO ALLOW FOR

08:07:03 PROPERTY WITH MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

08:07:07 95-FOOT IN DEPTH.

08:07:09 TOTAL LOT AREA OF 450 SQUARE FEET.

08:07:11 THE PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED BY ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY

08:07:14 STRUCTURE.

08:07:14 THE SITE IS FOUR BLOCKS EAST OF NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE AND

08:07:19 WEST ST. JOHN STREET INTERSECTIONS.

08:07:21 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY

08:07:23 DWELLINGS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST IN RS-50

08:07:26 ZONING DISTRICT.

08:07:27 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND

08:07:29 MUST COMPLY WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT

08:07:32 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.

08:07:34 THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST.




08:07:36 THEREFORE NO WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED.

08:07:38 AND THERE IS ALSO NO SITE PLAN.

08:07:40 AS YOU CAN SEE ON SCREEN RATE NOW THE AERIAL IS SHOWING

08:07:43 THE HISTORIC LANDMARK, WHICH THERE'S THE EL CENTRO

08:07:49 ESPANOL, WEST TAMPA, WHICH IS THE HISTORIC LANDMARK

08:07:52 LOCAL, AND THERE'S NO NATIONAL LANDMARKS WITHIN 1,000

08:07:55 FOOT.

08:07:56 THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED.

08:07:59 YOU CAN SEE ARMENIA HERE.

08:08:02 AND THEN OBVIOUSLY THE ST. JOHN STREET RIGHT HERE.

08:08:07 THE PICTURE TO THE LEFT IS THE SUBJECT SITE.

08:08:09 AND THEN THE PICTURE TO THE RIGHT IS WEST ON ST. JOHN

08:08:13 STREET.

08:08:14 ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE NORTH OF THE SITE.

08:08:18 THE NORTHWEST OF THE SITE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE

08:08:20 SCREEN.

08:08:23 AND THEN LEFT SIDE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE AND RIGHT SIDE

08:08:26 OF THE SCREEN EAST OF SITE.

08:08:29 AND THEN THE WEST OF THE SITE.

08:08:32 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED

08:08:35 THE APPLICATION AND WE FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH

08:08:37 THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.

08:08:39 STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

08:08:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?

08:08:43 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.




08:08:44 [~AUDIO FEEDBACK~]

08:08:50 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:08:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

08:08:57 MR. MANASSE, I'M PRETTY COMFORTABLE WITH THIS AREA.

08:09:05 I THIS I THIS IS A SIDE STREET, A PATHWAY BETWEEN ARMENIA

08:09:09 AND HOWARD, CORRECT?

08:09:10 >> THAT IS CORRECT, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:09:13 HERE ON SCREEN STILL, WE HAVE ARMENIA OVERHEAR TO YOUR

08:09:17 LEFT.

08:09:18 THEN YOU HAVE HOWARD TO THE EAST.

08:09:19 AND THEN ST. JOHN, THE STREET THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON.

08:09:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT.

08:09:25 SOUTH OF ABOUT FOUR BLOCKS SOUTH OF COLUMBUS.

08:09:27 >> YES, SIR.

08:09:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE THING THAT'S STRANGE TO ME IS

08:09:33 THAT YOU SAID THE ENTIRE STREET FACE, THIS ENTIRE BLOCK

08:09:40 FACE IS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY?

08:09:45 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, SIR.

08:09:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND NOW THE REQUEST IS TO INTRODUCE

08:09:52 MULTIFAMILY, RM-24.

08:09:54 I WOULD ASSUME THIS AN AERIAL -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE

08:10:00 OPPORTUNITY IS FOR RM-24.

08:10:05 IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A SITE PLAN CONTROLLED.

08:10:10 >>RYAN MANASSE: I CAN ANSWER, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:10:12 THE RM-24 OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 AND 3 THAT




08:10:16 DOES ALLOW MAXIMUM DENSITY TO FIND OUT HOW MANY DWELLING

08:10:20 UNITS YOU HAVE, IT'S 1850 SQUARE FEET.

08:10:23 ON THE SUBJECT LOT YOU CAN GET TWO DWELLING UNITS OUT OF

08:10:25 THIS.

08:10:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND STAFF DOESN'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH

08:10:31 THE INTRODUCTION OF A MULTIFAMILY ATTACHED PRODUCT ON

08:10:38 WHAT IS OTHERWISE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED?

08:10:43 >>RYAN MANASSE: NO, SIR.

08:10:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

08:10:46 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

08:10:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:10:49 ALL RIGHT.

08:10:50 ANYTHING ELSE, MR. MANASSE?

08:10:55 >>RYAN MANASSE: THAT CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION.

08:10:58 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:10:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. BRICKLEMYER, PLEASE STATE YOUR

08:11:00 NAME AND YOU MAY PRESENT.

08:11:02 AND PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF.

08:11:03 >> I UNMUTED MYSELF.

08:11:07 J.B. BRICKLEMYER, 601 WEST ASHLEY, SUITE 700 IN TAMPA.

08:11:13 I'M REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND THE APPLICANT.

08:11:19 I WILL GET TO MR. DINGFELDER'S QUESTIONS IF YOU WILL BEAR

08:11:22 WITH ME ONE SECOND.

08:11:23 MIGHT HAVE A FEW COMMENTS AND THEN I'LL TAKE QUESTIONS IF

08:11:26 THERE ARE ANY.




08:11:27 AS MR. MANASSE STIPULATED IN THE REPORT THE PROPERTY IS

08:11:29 RS-50 AND WE ARE REQUESTING REZONING TO RM-24 WHICH

08:11:33 ALLOWS ON THE FUTURE LAND USE 35.

08:11:36 MY CLIENTS OWNED THE PROPERTY SINCE 2008.

08:11:40 IT IS CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR THAT USE SINCE 2008 AND A

08:11:48 PRIOR OWNER FOR MULTIFAMILY USE.

08:11:51 SO THAT WAS THE PROBLEM THAT WE ARE TRYING TO ADDRESS, TO

08:11:54 GET THE USE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAN THE ZONING.

08:11:58 AND I WILL GET TO THIS IN A SECOND HERE.

08:12:00 THERE ARE NO MODIFICATIONS.

08:12:01 THE STRUCTURE IS TWO DETACHED STRUCTURES, BOTH OF WHICH

08:12:04 WERE USED FOR ONE FAMILY PER STRUCTURE FOR THE

08:12:07 MULTIFAMILY USE, 1850 SQUARE FEET.

08:12:10 SO THE ABILITY TO COME IN I THINK, MR. DINGFELDER'S

08:12:14 CONCERN, IS COME IN AND PUT AN APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT IN

08:12:17 ON THIS LOT.

08:12:17 THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE YOU HAVE 1815 SQUARE

08:12:20 FEET.

08:12:21 IT'S THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY WE ARE GOING TO BE

08:12:23 ABLE TO GET. MY CLIENT HAS NO INTENT TO DO ANYTHING WITH

08:12:26 THE PROPERTY AS FAR AS THE STRUCTURES GO OR CHANGE OF USE

08:12:29 FROM WHAT IT WAS.

08:12:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, YOU ARE MUTED,

08:12:35 SIR.

08:12:40 STILL MUTED, MR. MIRANDA.




08:12:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WAS JUST ASKING THE CHAIRMAN TO

08:12:48 SPEAK AFTER YOU FINISH.

08:12:50 >> THANK YOU.

08:12:53 AS I WAS SAYING, THOSE WILL BE LIMITED EVEN IF HE HAD AN

08:12:59 INTENT TO KNOW DON THAT, AND BASICALLY WHAT HE'S GOT, AND

08:13:04 HE'S NOT INTENDING TO DO THAT.

08:13:09 AS WE SAID, IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOR AT LEAST 12 YEARS AND

08:13:13 FOR 8 YEARS BEFORE THAT BASED ON THE SALES THAT OCCURRED.

08:13:16 I RECEIVED THREE PHONE CALLS FROM THE NEIGHBORS AFTER

08:13:18 POSTING TWO OF WHOM HAVE THEIR OWN PROPERTY ON THAT

08:13:21 STREET SO IT'S ALREADY A PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD.

08:13:25 ONCE I SAID NO CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURES, NOBODY HAD AN

08:13:29 ISSUE.

08:13:30 IN FACT NOBODY SHOWED UP TONIGHT.

08:13:34 SO MY CLIENT REZONED THE PROPERTY TO BRING IT INTO

08:13:38 COMPLIANCE, REFERRING TO PAGE 6 OF THE STAFF REPORT.

08:13:41 THERE IS A MIX OF ZONING IN THE AREA.

08:13:43 VERY SMALL SECTION OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING ON THIS

08:13:45 PARTICULAR STREET, AND SURROUNDED BY RM-16, NORTH, SOUTH,

08:13:51 EAST AND QUEST, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE STRIP ALONG THE

08:13:54 NORTH ARMENIA BLOCK, ONE BLOCK TO THE SOUTH, AND

08:13:58 COMMERCIAL ONE BLOCK TO THE SOUTH.

08:14:01 THERE ARE A VAST NUMBER PDs AROUND THAT, PAGE 6.

08:14:06 I DIDN'T GO BACK AND RESEARCH THEM ALL, BUT THAT

08:14:08 INDICATES AN INCREASED INTENSITY OR CHANGE OF USE THAT




08:14:11 WOULD NOT HAVE OTHERWISE BEEN ALLOWED IN EUCLIDEAN

08:14:14 ZONING.

08:14:14 SO THE PROPERTY WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR IS BASICALLY

08:14:18 CONTINUE THE USE THAT'S BEEN THE USE FOR A LONG TIME, NO

08:14:22 INTENT TO REDEVELOP PROPERTY, AND EVEN IF THERE WAS

08:14:24 INTENT TO REZONE PROPERTY IT'S NOT GOING TO BE MUCH

08:14:27 DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE BEEN ON THE SITE

08:14:29 BECAUSE OF RESTRICTIONS IN SQUARE FOOTAGE.

08:14:31 AGAIN, MY CLIENT HAS NO INTENT TO CHANGE ANYTHING.

08:14:34 JUST TRYING TO GET IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND IN

08:14:36 COMPLIANCE WITH USE, THAT HE BECAME AWARE OF A YEAR AND A

08:14:40 HALF AGO WHEN BEE STARTED THIS PROCESS TO GET THIS

08:14:42 RESOLVED.

08:14:44 AND WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDE MY STATEMENTS.

08:14:47 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, CHAIR, COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

08:14:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SIR.

08:14:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

08:14:55 FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK YOU, AND I WANT TO THANK

08:15:00 YOUR CLIENT.

08:15:01 IF I UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU SAID, THERE'S A BUILDING THERE

08:15:04 NOW THAT SOMEONE ADDED OTHER THAN IT.

08:15:07 AM I CORRECT?

08:15:08 OR IS IT THE SAME BUILDING, SAME LOT?

08:15:12 >> NO, SIR, I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE STRUCTURES WERE BUILT

08:15:15 BASED ON WHAT WE CAN GATHER FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S




08:15:17 SITE.

08:15:18 THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES ON THE SITE AND THEY HAVE BEEN

08:15:19 USED FOR MULTIFAMILY FOR QUITE A PERIOD OF TIME.

08:15:23 HE WAS NOTIFIED OF THIS DISCREPANCY AND WHEN HE CAME TO

08:15:27 ME, I SAID REZONE IT SO YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO THAT IN

08:15:31 THAT AREA, AND TO REZONE TO THE GET IN COMPLIANCE WITH

08:15:34 THE ZONING.

08:15:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET ME SAY, IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE

08:15:40 NEED TO DO ALL OVER WEST TAMPA.

08:15:43 I WOULD VENTURE TO SAY THAT NOT ONE BLOCK -- I AM GOING

08:15:46 TO SAY THAT AGAIN, NOT ONE BLOCK WHO DOESN'T HAVE ILLEGAL

08:15:50 DWELLINGS, THAT'S BEEN ADDED ONTO, AND CONVERTED FROM

08:15:54 SINGLE-FAMILY TO MULTIFAMILY, WITHOUT PAYING ANY TAX FOR

08:16:00 15, 20 YEARS, AND IT'S ONE OF THE PROBLEMS THAT WE HAVE.

08:16:05 AND YOU HAVE RENTAL CERTIFICATES THAT SOME OF US PAY, AND

08:16:09 MOST OF THEM DON'T PAY.

08:16:11 DON'T PAY ANYTHING.

08:16:12 THEY DON'T PAY AD VALOREM TAX.

08:16:14 THEY DON'T PAY RENTAL CERTIFICATE.

08:16:16 AND IT'S TIME THAT WE START TAKING A HARDER LOOK AT THESE

08:16:20 THINGS.

08:16:20 AND I WANT TO COMPLIMENT YOUR CLIENT, WHOEVER HE OR SHE

08:16:25 IS IS BECAUSE THEY ARE DOING THE RIGHT THING.

08:16:27 AND THIS PART AS YOU WELL KNOW, MORE LIKELY TO PAY TAXES.

08:16:35 FOR ONE DWELLING.




08:16:37 YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE NOW SEVERAL BECAUSE YOU ARE

08:16:40 MULTIFAMILY.

08:16:40 AND I APPLAUD THEM FOR DOING THAT.

08:16:43 VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS, HE OR SHE.

08:16:48 IN FACT THIS IS THE FIRST THAT I CAN EVER RECALL IN ALL

08:16:50 MY YEARS OF PUBLIC SERVICE THAT HAVE DONE THIS.

08:16:53 AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED.

08:16:57 WEST TAMPA, FULL OF TRACTOR TRAILERS AND ILLEGAL

08:17:04 DWELLINGS.

08:17:04 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.

08:17:05 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

08:17:09 ANYBODY ELSE?

08:17:11 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:17:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JB, WELCOME TO COUNCIL.

08:17:19 YOU HAVE GOOD PEDIGREE WITH YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER.

08:17:23 IT'S NICE TO SEE ANOTHER BRICKLEMYER.

08:17:26 SO LET ME JUST CLARIFY.

08:17:33 I HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.

08:17:34 IT SOUND TO ME LIKE YOU HAVE GOT TWO STRUCTURES OUT THERE

08:17:37 THAT HAVE BEEN ACTING AS TWO SEPARATE RENTALS, AND YOUR

08:17:41 CLIENT IS TRYING TO FIX THAT.

08:17:43 WITH THE EUCLIDEAN ZONING.

08:17:47 LET ME CLARIFY, COUNCIL, AND I AM SURE I AM STATING THE

08:17:51 OBVIOUS, FOR THE REST OF COUNCIL, NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY,

08:17:54 NO MATTER WHAT YOUR CLIENT SAYS, IT DOESN'T MATTER, YOU




08:17:58 HAVE GOT EUCLIDEAN ZONING, YOU COULD TEAR IT DOWN AND

08:18:02 COULD GET THE REZONING, TEAR DOWN THE EXISTING AND BUILD

08:18:06 TWO PROBABLY TEN HOMES SIDE BY SIDE, 1850 SQUARE FEET,

08:18:14 900 PER FLOOR, THEREABOUTS.

08:18:16 I THINK THAT'S A REALISTIC POSSIBILITY.

08:18:21 MR. MANASSE SAID THAT WAS THE MINIMUM.

08:18:24 AND ON A SMALL LOT THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT COULD HAPPEN.

08:18:28 BUT I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE,

08:18:31 YOU KNOW.

08:18:34 YOU KNOW FROM LAW SCHOOL AND EVERYTHING ELSE, IT RUNS

08:18:36 WITH THE LAND, AND ONCE ZONING IS THERE IT'S THERE.

08:18:42 THE CONCERN I HAVE IS, THERE ISN'T ANY OPPOSITION AND

08:18:47 THAT SORT OF THING BUT THAT SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE OUR

08:18:49 DECISION MAKER.

08:18:53 IF THIS PROJECT WAS IN VIRGINIA PARK, PALMA CEIA, OR

08:18:57 BAYSHORE OR WHATEVER, YOU KNOW, AND IT WAS GOING FROM

08:19:01 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO RM-24, YOU PROBABLY WOULD HAVE

08:19:04 SOME OBJECTIONS.

08:19:05 BUT FOR WHAT REASON, WE DON'T HAVE ANY TONIGHT.

08:19:10 ANYWAY, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

08:19:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:19:13 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

08:19:15 MR. BRICKLEMYER, DO YOU HAVE ANY -- WAIT, DO WE HAVE ANY

08:19:20 PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM NUMBER 6?

08:19:23 BEFORE WE GO TO REBUTTAL?




08:19:24 >> NO OTHER COMMENTS.

08:19:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING,

08:19:28 SIR?

08:19:30 >>RYAN MANASSE: I WAS JUST STATING ITEM NUMBER 5.

08:19:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I'M SORRY, ITEM NUMBER 5.

08:19:34 YES, SIR.

08:19:35 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR FOR PUBLIC

08:19:36 COMMENT?

08:19:42 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS

08:19:44 ITEM.

08:19:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:19:46 MR. BRICKLEMYER, DO YOU HAVE REBUTTAL, SIR?

08:19:49 >> JUST A COUPLE OF BRIEF COMMENTS.

08:19:51 MR. DINGFELDER, THANK YOU.

08:19:52 I THINK I WILL TAKE THAT AS A COMPLIMENT.

08:19:54 MY BROTHER AND MY NEPHEW, NOT MY DAD.

08:19:59 I APPRECIATE THAT.

08:20:00 I HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING AND I THINK IT'S A VALID

08:20:02 POINT, BUT FOR THE FACT THAT MY CLIENTS OWNED THE

08:20:05 PROPERTY FOR 12, 13 YEARS NOW.

08:20:10 AND ONCE HE DISCOVERED THIS -- AND BY THE WAY, MR.

08:20:14 MIRANDA, HE'S THE SAME RENTAL CERTIFICATE, BEFORE ALL OF

08:20:16 THE DWELLINGS, ALL OF THE RENTALS THAT HAVE GONE ON

08:20:19 THERE.

08:20:26 SO, AGAIN, ONCE IT CAME TO HIS ATTENTION THIS WAS A




08:20:28 PROBLEM HE CALLED US AND SAID, HEY, HOW DO I FIX THIS,

08:20:31 AND IN FUTURE LAND USE, I SAID HERE IS A SIMPLE WAY TO

08:20:34 FIX IT.

08:20:35 SO AGAIN, I CAN'T SAY WITH 100% CERTAINTY HE'S NOT GOING

08:20:39 TO DO THAT BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY HE WOULD HOLD SOMETHING

08:20:43 13 YEARS AND THEN GO BACK AND PUT MONEY INTO IT AND TEAR

08:20:46 SOMETHING DOWN AND PUT SOMETHING BACK UP.

08:20:49 THE PROPERTY VALUES AND THE RENTAL VALUES IN THAT

08:20:52 NEIGHBORHOOD ARE GOING TO IN -- AREN'T GOING TO INCREASE

08:20:54 DRAMATICALLY JUST BECAUSE HE COMES IN AND TEARS SOMETHING

08:20:57 DOWN AND PUTS A NEW HOUSE.

08:20:58 SO I SUSPECT HE'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING FROM THE

08:21:02 WAY HE'S DOING.

08:21:02 HE'S JUSTIFIES JUST TRYING TO GET INTO COMPLIANCE WITH

08:21:05 WHAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO DO LEGITIMATELY AND LEGALLY.

08:21:09 THAT'S ALL I HAVE, MR. CHAIR.

08:21:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?

08:21:14 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.

08:21:16 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.

08:21:18 ALL IN FAVOR?

08:21:19 ALL RIGHT.

08:21:19 COUNCILMAN GUDES, WOULD YOU READ ITEM NUMBER 5?

08:21:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: REZ 20-49.

08:21:29 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING

08:21:31 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE




08:21:32 GENERAL VICINITY OF 2328 WEST ST. JOHN STREET IN THE CITY

08:21:35 OF TAMPA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1

08:21:38 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL

08:21:41 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING

08:21:44 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

08:21:47 >> SECOND.

08:21:48 >> WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECOND BY

08:21:52 COUNCILMAN CITRO.

08:21:53 ROLL CALL VOTE.

08:21:54 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

08:21:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

08:21:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

08:21:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

08:22:01 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

08:22:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

08:22:05 >> YES.

08:22:06 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

08:22:08 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON APRIL 1st

08:22:10 AT 9:30 A.M.

08:22:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE GO TO THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT,

08:22:14 AND IT'S NOT MIDNIGHT.

08:22:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JB, YOU ARE HOLDING UP BETTER THAN

08:22:20 YOUR BROTHER.

08:22:20 >> THANK YOU, SIR.

08:22:23 I APPRECIATE THAT.




08:22:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE.

08:22:27 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

08:22:28 ITEM NUMBER 6 IS FILE REZ 20-65.

08:22:32 THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY GENERALLY

08:22:34 LOCATED AT 3815 AND 3825 HENDERSON BOULEVARD, 1002 SOUTH

08:22:39 CHURCH AVENUE, AND 3816 WEST MORRISON AVENUE FROM PD TO

08:22:43 PD.

08:22:45 I'LL LIST THE USES.

08:22:46 PARCEL 1 USES FOR OFFICE, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL AND

08:22:49 MEDICAL, COLLEGE, BUSINESS SCHOOL, VOCATIONAL SCHOOL,

08:22:52 BANK WITH DRIVE-IN, DRIVE-IN WINDOW, ALL COMMERCIAL

08:22:55 GENERAL USES, RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE GADS, RETAIL

08:22:59 SALES, SHOPPER GOODS, DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY

08:23:02 RESIDENTIAL, DAYCARE AND NURSERY FACILITY, AND PUBLIC USE

08:23:05 FACILITY, RECREATIONAL FACILITY, COMMERCIAL INDOOR, AND

08:23:08 RESTAURANT, AND THEN FOR PARCEL 2, INCLUDES CG ALL

08:23:12 COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES.

08:23:14 I'LL DEFER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT.

08:23:16 AND IF YOU WOULD PLEASE RETURN TO ME SO I CAN FINISH

08:23:19 MINE.

08:23:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:23:20 MR. COLLINS?

08:23:25 YOUR SCREEN IS UP.

08:23:26 >> DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.

08:23:30 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.




08:23:31 OUR LAST CASE IS IN THE SOUTH PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE

08:23:37 SPECIFICALLY IN THE PALMA CEIA WEST NEIGHBORHOOD.

08:23:44 CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS SOUTH DIXON CENTER

08:23:49 WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF THE SITE, TRANSIT STOPS, HART

08:23:56 ROUTE 19 AND 36 PROVIDE CONNECTIONS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE

08:23:58 TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA, AND HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE.

08:24:03 AND WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.

08:24:08 HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

08:24:11 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.

08:24:12 YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN PURPLE COLOR,

08:24:16 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE AND

08:24:20 HENDERSON BOULEVARD.

08:24:21 YOU WILL SEE THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN PREDOMINANTLY

08:24:25 NONRESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL. TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT

08:24:27 SITE YOU WILL SEE THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN PREDOMINANTLY

08:24:32 RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.

08:24:37 HERE IS THE FUTURE LAND USE, THE SUBJECT SITE IN PURPLE

08:24:41 COLOR, CURRENTLY CMU-35, LAND USE DESIGNATION.

08:24:45 DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, NORTHWEST IS

08:24:49 RESIDENTIAL 20, TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS PUBLIC

08:24:58 AND SOUTH IS CMU-35.

08:25:01 TRANSFORMATION OF THE CITY'S MIXED USE CORRIDORS, MIXED

08:25:05 USE TRANSIT, PROPOSED MIXED USE STRUCTURE PROVIDES FOR A

08:25:12 NUMBER OF USES, PORTION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS

08:25:15 ADJACENT TO HENDERSON BOULEVARD PROVIDES CONNECTION TO




08:25:18 THE ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDEWALK.

08:25:20 ALONG CHURCH AVENUE, THAT BACKS OUT ONTO THE PUBLIC

08:25:26 RIGHT-OF-WAY WOULD BE REPLACED WITH A SIDEWALK

08:25:28 LANDSCAPING AND RETAIL USES FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

08:25:32 WITHIN THE EXTRAORDINARY PARKING GARAGE.

08:25:34 THE PD IS PROVIDING FOR A NUMBER OF INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN

08:25:37 CONNECTIONS INCLUDING A SKY BRIDGE TO CONNECT PEDESTRIANS

08:25:40 TO THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS, ALL CONSISTING WITH THE MIXED

08:25:45 USE CORRIDOR POLICIES.

08:25:46 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE, SURROUNDING

08:25:49 DEVELOPMENT PATS EARN, REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S MIXED

08:25:51 USE CORRIDORS, IN A WAY THAT PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN TRANSIT

08:25:54 USES.

08:25:55 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO CONSISTING OF DEVELOPMENT

08:25:58 PATTERN UNDER CMU-35 LAND USE DESIGNATION.

08:26:02 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLAN IS CONSISTENT

08:26:05 WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

08:26:08 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

08:26:10 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

08:26:11 >>RYAN MANASSE: IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN.

08:26:19 AND PLEASE LET ME KNOW ONCE YOU SEE IT.

08:26:24 >> WE SEE IT NOW.

08:26:28 >> ITEM NUMBER 6, REZ 20-65.

08:26:31 SORRY.

08:26:32 ONE SECOND, PLEASE.




08:26:33 AGAIN, AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, IT'S REZONING FROM PD TO PD

08:26:37 FOR THE PREVIOUSLY STATED USES.

08:26:40 THERE ARE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WAIVERS FROM REZ 18-26 THAT

08:26:43 ARE BEING PULLED OVER ONTO THIS REQUEST, AND THAT'S

08:26:48 WAIVERS 1 THROUGH 5, AND THEN THERE IS ONLY ONE NEW

08:26:51 WAIVER BEING REQUESTED, AND THAT'S FROM 27-284-3.17 WHICH

08:26:56 IS A NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVER.

08:26:58 JUST TO POINT THAT OUT.

08:26:59 THE SUMMARY, THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE

08:27:02 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3815 AND 3825 HENDERSON BOULEVARD,

08:27:06 1002 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE AND 3816 WEST MORRISON AVENUE

08:27:09 FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS FILE REZ 18-26 FOR

08:27:13 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD TO

08:27:15 CONSTRUCT A MIXED USE PROJECT.

08:27:17 AND 2018 A PD APPROVAL WAS GRANTED FOR FOLLOWING USES,

08:27:22 PEDESTRIAN, BANK WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW, RETAIL SALES,

08:27:26 DAYCARE AND POST OFFICE USES.

08:27:28 THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175,358 SQUARE FEET OR 1.4 F.A.R.

08:27:33 THIS APPLICATION PROPOSES SIMILAR USES AND HAS BEEN

08:27:36 REDESIGNED TO LIMIT THE USE OF -- LEM NIGHT THE USE OF

08:27:39 THE PARCEL 2 AS PART OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.

08:27:42 THESE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS 2 PARCELS.

08:27:44 THIS PROJECT PROPOSALS TO REDESIGN AND REPLACE THE

08:27:47 EXISTING BUILDING ON PARCEL 1 WITH A NEW OFFICE BUILDING

08:27:50 AND CONSTRUCT A 6-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE WHICH




08:27:53 INCORPORATES COMMERCIAL USES.

08:27:55 PARCEL 2 IS UNDER SEPARATED OWNERSHIP, AND CONTAINS A

08:27:59 27007 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE.

08:28:02 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE ALLOWANCE OF ALL COMMERCIAL

08:28:06 GENERAL CG USES ON THAT PARCEL 2.

08:28:09 THE 2.78-ACRE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT -- I'M SORRY,

08:28:13 NO IS NOT CORRECT.

08:28:14 IT'S NOT VACANT.

08:28:15 AND IT'S BOUNDED BY WEST MORRISON AVENUE TO THE NORTH,

08:28:17 SOUTH, TO THE NORTH, SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND

08:28:21 HENDERSON BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH.

08:28:23 THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY SCHOOL USE TO THE NORTH AND THE

08:28:26 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE RO-1 ZONING DISTRICT.

08:28:29 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO THE WEST AND THE RESIDENTIAL

08:28:31 SINGLE-FAMILY RS-60 ZONING DISTRICT, AND CG ZONING

08:28:35 DISTRICT AND COMMERCIAL USES TO THE SOUTH IN THE CG

08:28:38 ZONING DISTRICT, AND THEN EAST IN THE PD FILE Z-07-29,

08:28:43 ORDINANCE 2007-123 ZONING DISTRICT.

08:28:49 CONTINUING MY SUMMARY, I WANT TO PUT -- THIS IS IN YOUR

08:28:52 STAFF REPORT. THIS IS A BUILDING SETBACK, THE CHART, THE

08:28:55 NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST SETBACKS FOR PARCEL 1 BUILDING,

08:28:57 AND THEN PARCEL 1 PARKING STRUCTURE AND THEN PARCEL 2

08:29:01 BUILDING.

08:29:02 AGAIN THESE ARE REFLECTED IN YOUR STAFF REPORTS.

08:29:04 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OVERALL IS PROPOSED AT 130




08:29:08 FEET FOR PARCEL 1 AND 45 FEET FOR PARCEL 2.

08:29:11 THE PROJECT REQUIRES A TOTAL OF 642 PARKING SPACES AND

08:29:15 826 SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.

08:29:17 VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY IS PROPOSED ON CHURCH

08:29:19 AVENUE, HENDERSON BOULEVARD, AND MORRISON AVENUE.

08:29:22 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF

08:29:26 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 WHICH ALLOWS AN INTENSITY DENSITY

08:29:29 UP TO 1.5 F.A.R. WITH MIXED USE AND INTENSITY DENSITY OF

08:29:33 UP TO 2.0 F.A.R. WHEN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ARE MET.

08:29:37 THIS SITE CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 1,024 -- I'M SORRY, 124,730

08:29:43 SQUARE FEET OR 2.87 ACRES.

08:29:47 THAT'S TO INCLUDE PARCEL 1 WHICH IS 125,565 SQUARE FEET

08:29:52 AND PARCEL 2 WHICH IS 3,175 SQUARE FEET.

08:29:57 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES DEVELOPMENT WITH AN OVERALL F.A.R.

08:30:00 OF 1.478.

08:30:03 ON SCREEN NOW IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

08:30:06 THERE ARE SEVEN SHEETS AND THOSE WERE DELIVERED LAST WEEK

08:30:09 AS WELL AS DIGITALLY, AND THE HARD COPIES, BUT AS YOU CAN

08:30:14 SEE THIS SITE IS A TRIANGULAR SHAPE, JUST TO POINT OUT

08:30:18 QUICKLY THE PARCEL 2 PORTIONS RIGHT HERE, THE LITTLE

08:30:21 TRIANGLE PIECE, AND THEN THE PARCEL 1 IS THE REMAINING

08:30:24 PARCEL.

08:30:25 AND THEN THE PARKING GARAGE HERE STANDARD WITH THOSE

08:30:27 OTHER COMMERCIAL USES, AND THE OTHER STRUCTURE HERE WITH

08:30:31 THE ROUNDABOUT ACCESS OVER HERE.




08:30:35 THE ELEVATION, THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS

08:30:39 BEING PROPOSED TO THIS PETITION, AND THEN THE GARAGE

08:30:42 ELEVATION TO NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST.

08:30:47 TO THE LEFT, I WILL TRY TO GET AS MANY PICTURES AS WE CAN

08:30:51 OF THAT ODDLY SHAPED LOT.

08:30:53 SOUTHEAST SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT.

08:30:55 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE RIGHT.

08:30:57 SOUTH OF THE SITE WHICH IS THE CORNER OF HENDERSON AND

08:31:00 CHURCH IS ON THE LEFT.

08:31:01 AND THEN AGAIN THE SOUTH POINT OF THE SITE WHICH IS

08:31:04 CHURCH LOOKING EAST.

08:31:07 TOP EAST OF THE SITE.

08:31:09 SOUTH -- I'M SORRY, BOTTOM SOUTH OF THE SITE.

08:31:13 PICTURE TO THE LEFT, WEST OF THE SITE, WHICH IS SOUTH END

08:31:17 CHURCH, AND THEN THE RIGHT PHOTO IS WEST SIDE OF THE SITE

08:31:20 ON CHURCH.

08:31:22 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE

08:31:25 PETITION AND WE FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH

08:31:27 APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

08:31:29 SHOULD IT THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE

08:31:31 WAIVERS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND APPROVE THE

08:31:35 APPLICATION, THE ONE WAIVER DOES NEED TO BE AMENDED

08:31:38 THAT'S SHOWN AS A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WAIVER, WAIVER

08:31:42 NUMBER 3 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND YALE JUST

08:31:45 SHOW YOU AGAIN ON SCREEN.




08:31:47 THIS IS ALREADY APPROVED FROM REZ 18-26.

08:31:50 SO THIS IS THE -- I'M SORRY, WAIVER NUMBER 3 THAT WE ARE

08:31:54 ASKING TO BE ADDED TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND

08:31:56 SECOND READING.

08:31:57 WITH THAT BEING SAID, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY

08:31:59 QUESTIONS THAT COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

08:32:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.

08:32:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.

08:32:08 JUST AS A GUIDE, I WAS WONDERING, DO WE HAVE PEOPLE

08:32:13 SIGNED UP, MR. CHAIRMAN?

08:32:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE FOUR PEOPLE VIRTUALLY.

08:32:17 WE HAVE PETITIONER.

08:32:18 WE HAVE MS. OSBORNE.

08:32:22 AND MS. CORBETT.

08:32:25 WE HAVEN'T SWORN THEM IN, THOUGH.

08:32:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DO WE HAVE ANY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC

08:32:29 EITHER THERE OR --

08:32:31 >>> THERE'S NOBODY IN PERSON ON THE SECOND FLOOR.

08:32:34 WE HAVE ONE PERSON TO SPEAK.

08:32:39 AILEEN, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY DOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR?

08:32:44 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO

08:32:49 SPEAK.

08:32:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE ONE PERSON SPEAKING

08:32:52 VIRTUALLY.

08:32:52 I DON'T SEE THEM ON.




08:32:57 MR. OSBORNE?

08:32:59 HE IS?

08:33:01 HE'S NOT?

08:33:02 OKAY.

08:33:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU ARE PART OF THE PETITION.

08:33:09 EVERYBODY IS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK AS PART OF THE PETITION.

08:33:11 IS THAT WHAT I AM HEARING?

08:33:16 >> YES.

08:33:16 >> ALL RIGHT.

08:33:22 LET'S BEGIN.

08:33:24 MR. OSBORNE.

08:33:25 MR. CARNES.

08:33:28 WE'LL SQUARE IN NOW.

08:33:30 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).

08:33:33 >> I DO.

08:33:34 >> I DO.

08:33:34 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:33:37 COUNCILMAN CITRO, YES, SIR.

08:33:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. MANASSE, PLEASE, THEY ARE ASKING FOR

08:33:42 A WAIVER OF 50% TREES?

08:33:45 I AM LOOKING AT AN AERIAL VIEW, AND I REALLY DON'T SEE

08:33:48 ANY TREES FROM THE AERIAL VIEW.

08:33:50 IS THEREIN ACTUALLY TREES THERE?

08:33:52 >> THERE'S A LOT OF PALM TREES, SIR.

08:33:56 AND I DO HAVE NATURAL RESOURCES STAFF IF YOU WANT ANY




08:33:58 FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THEM AVAILABLE, AND I SEE RICKY

08:34:02 PETERIKA.

08:34:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, CHAIR.

08:34:07 >> PETITIONER, GO AHEAD AND PRESENT.

08:34:10 >> KAMI CORBETT WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL WARD HENDERSON,

08:34:18 MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?

08:34:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.

08:34:32 WE SEE YOUR SCREEN.

08:34:34 PULL UP YOUR PowerPoint.

08:34:50 WE SEE IT.

08:34:51 GO AHEAD.

08:34:51 >> GOOD EVENING.

08:34:52 KAMI CORBETT FOR THE RECORD.

08:34:55 I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE THIS EVENING OF REPRESENTING

08:34:57 APPLICANT CROWN TOWER LLC.

08:34:59 CROWN TOWER IS AN ENTITY OWNED BY THE JACOBSON FAN

08:35:04 FAMILY, SPECIFICALLY MELVIN AND HIS SON DAVID WHO MANAGE

08:35:07 THE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND

08:35:10 THEY ARE HEADING THIS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.

08:35:13 THESE ARE IMAGES OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AND THE

08:35:15 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

08:35:17 AND CROWN IS VERY PROUD OF THE REDESIGN OF THIS SITE AND

08:35:21 THINKS THAT IT REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT OVER

08:35:23 WHAT CURRENTLY IS ON THIS SITE AND AN IMPROVEMENT OVER

08:35:26 WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN THE 2018 PLAN.




08:35:30 THE JACOBSONS OWNED THIS PROPERTY SINCE 1947.

08:35:34 AND THEY DEVELOPED THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING IN 1962.

08:35:37 THEY ARE NOT SPECULATIVE DEVELOPERS.

08:35:40 THEY HAVE BEEN INVESTED IN THIS AREA FOR 74 YEARS.

08:35:42 THE JACOBSONS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY SENSITIVE TO HOW THE

08:35:46 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE

08:35:49 NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT'S WHY IN 2018 WHEN THE

08:35:53 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED THEY

08:35:55 INCLUDED THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND

08:35:58 NEIGHBORS IN THE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE PROPOSED

08:35:59 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.

08:36:01 AS A RESULT, THEY HAVE NO OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED PD.

08:36:05 AND THE SITE PLAN IS REFERRED IN 2018.

08:36:10 THE SAME IS TRUE WITH THIS PROPOSED REDESIGN.

08:36:12 MR. JACOBSON SPOKE WITH ALL THE STADIUM STAKEHOLDERS

08:36:17 INCLUDING THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE NEIGHBORS AND

08:36:19 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND MADE SURE THEY KNEW EXACTLY

08:36:23 WHAT WAS BEING PROPOSED.

08:36:24 AND WE ARE HAPPY TO REPORT THAT ONCE AGAIN WE HAVE

08:36:29 SUPPORT OF THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, AS

08:36:31 EVIDENCE IT BY THE E-MAIL THAT WAS SUBMITTED INTO THE

08:36:34 RECORD BY MR. MICHAEL McNABB, THE PRESIDENT OF THE

08:36:37 ASSOCIATION, AND AS YOU ALSO SAW, WE HAVE FATHER LEN FROM

08:36:39 CHRIST THE KING WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS

08:36:43 REQUEST AS WELL.




08:36:44 AND WITH THAT, I TURN THE PRESENTATION OVER TO MR. COHEN,

08:36:48 OUR PLANNING AND TRANSACTION CONSULTANT WHO WILL PROVIDE

08:36:51 ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE

08:36:52 EXISTING PD.

08:36:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.

08:36:55 >> IF I MAY, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE MY SCREEN.

08:37:22 >> I AM GOING TO FOCUS IN ON TO WHAT WE ARE DOING NOW.

08:37:25 THIS IS JUST AN PREVIEW OF THE SITE PLAN.

08:37:28 HERE IS A COLORED VERSION.

08:37:30 I WANT TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE SITE.

08:37:31 AS WE WERE ABLE TO DO THIS, WE WERE ABLE TO MOVE THE

08:37:34 BUILDING FROM BEING HERE AND EXTENDING ALL THE WAY BACK

08:37:37 TO MORRISON, BRINGING IT UP TO ITS PROPER LOCATION OFF

08:37:40 HENDERSON BOULEVARD.

08:37:41 THAT ALLOWED US AMONG OTHER THINGS TO CHANGE ACCESS TO

08:37:45 THE SITE, AND REDUCE THE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS.

08:37:49 THE DRIVEWAY AT HENDERSON.

08:37:51 WE PREVIOUSLY HAD THREE DRIVEWAYS ALONG CHURCH, AND DOWN

08:37:55 TO ONE.

08:37:56 WE HAVE TWO DRIVEWAYS ALONG MORRISON.

08:37:59 WE BROUGHT THAT DOWN TO ONE.

08:38:01 MORE IMPORTANTLY, WE BROUGHT ALL OF THE SERVICE ACTIVITY,

08:38:06 SOLID WASTE, INTERNAL TO THE SITE, WHICH IS VERY GOOD

08:38:10 FROM THE STANDPOINT OF WE WILL NOT BE IMPACTING ANY OF

08:38:12 THE PUBLIC ROADWAYS.




08:38:16 ALSO IT PROVIDES A GREAT SHIELD FROM NOISE AND

08:38:20 DISTURBANCE WITH LOADING AREAS GOING ON.

08:38:23 TALKING ABOUT THE AREA UP IN HERE, THE PARKING GARAGE,

08:38:25 THE NEIGHBORHOOD WAS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT SEEING SOME

08:38:29 ANIMATION ON THE SIDE OF THE PARKING GARAGE FACING

08:38:31 CHURCH.

08:38:32 WE HAVE RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL USES.

08:38:34 THEN WE GET TO THE PARKING STRUCTURE IN THIS AREA.

08:38:37 WE ARE ALSO KEEPING THE POST OFFICE WHICH IS CURRENTLY

08:38:41 LOCATED OVER HERE.

08:38:42 IT'S SIMPLY BEEN MOVED OVER AND PLACE PROVIDES ANIMATION

08:38:46 IN HERE.

08:38:48 WHILE THE PROJECT HAS INCREASED IN SQUARE FOOTAGE BY

08:38:51 ABOUT 4.9%, WE HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN ABLE TO INCREASE THE

08:38:54 TRAFFIC ON THE PROJECT BY NEARLY 30%.

08:38:58 HOW DID WE DO THAT?

08:39:00 FIRST, THE BUILDING WAS DECREASED IN SIZE BY 53%, A VERY

08:39:09 HIGH GENERATOR OF TRAFFIC.

08:39:10 ALSO WORKING WITH U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DECREASE THE SIZE

08:39:13 OF THE POST OFFICE BY 35%.

08:39:16 THOSE TWO REDUCTIONS MORE THAN OFFSET ANY SMALL SQUARE

08:39:22 FOOTAGE WE HAVE INCREASE IN THE BUILDING ITSELF.

08:39:25 ANOTHER IMPORTANT FEATURE OF THIS PROJECT IS THAT WHILE

08:39:28 IT'S PREDOMINANTLY OFFICE, 11.9% OF THE USES IN THIS

08:39:32 PROJECT ARE NOT ALL, THE COMPLEMENTARY RETAIL AND




08:39:37 COMMERCIAL USES THEMSELVES.

08:39:40 JUST A MOMENT ABOUT THE WAIVERS.

08:39:42 I GOT AHEAD OF MYSELF. TALK A MOMENT ABOUT THE WAIVERS

08:39:45 THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED IN THE PREVIOUS ZONING

08:39:47 BUT WE HAVE THEM ON HERE.

08:39:50 THE FIRST WAIVER IS FOR COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ON CHURCH AND

08:39:53 ON MORRISON.

08:39:55 THAT'S INEVITABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO BE THE PARKING

08:39:57 STRUCTURE TO THE PROJECT ITSELF.

08:39:59 ALSO, SCARED BY SOLID WASTE FOR THEIR OPERATION IS HERE.

08:40:05 SECOND TO REDUCE THE LOADING BERTH FROM THE REQUIRED 4 IN

08:40:09 THE CODE TO 2.

08:40:11 IT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND TWO LOADING BERTHS WORK

08:40:14 FINE FOR THIS PROJECT.

08:40:15 THE THIRD WAIVER IS THE MANEUVERING WAIVER, THE TECHNICAL

08:40:18 WAIVER REGARDING BACKING UP INTO, ALREADY APPROVED ON THE

08:40:24 SAME THING HERE.

08:40:26 FOURTH WAIVER IS LITERALLY TO NOT INCREASE THE SIGNAGE ON

08:40:31 THE BUILDING THAT'S ALLOWED UNDERSTOOD CODE BUT TO ALLOW

08:40:34 SOME FLEXIBILITY IN THE POSITIONING OF THOSE SIGNAGE TO

08:40:37 THE SHAPE OF THIS PARTICULAR BUILD ITSELF.

08:40:43 THE FIFTH WAIVER WAS IF WE WERE NOT ABLE TO GET ALL OF

08:40:47 THE VEGETATION TREES ON THE PROPERTY THAT WE BE ABLE TO

08:40:51 PAY INTO THE TREE TRUST FUND.

08:40:53 OUR ONE NEW WAIVER IS TREES.




08:40:55 AND WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO RICKY PETERIKA WHO

08:41:00 IS MUCH MORE VERSED ON TREES THAN I AM.

08:41:03 THANK YOU.

08:41:03 >> THANK YOU, RANDY.

08:41:07 CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?

08:41:23 BOARD CERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST.

08:41:25 WE ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER FROM THE MINIMUM TREE

08:41:28 RETENTION PERCENTAGE, A MINIMUM OF 50% IS REQUIRED FOR

08:41:32 ON-SITE PROTECTED TREES, AND WE ARE PROPOSING TO PRESERVE

08:41:37 45%.

08:41:38 THERE ARE 40 TREES ON THE SITE, 22 OF WHICH ARE BEING

08:41:42 REMOVED.

08:41:51 DID IT NOT SHOW UP?

08:41:53 ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THE PowerPoint?

08:41:55 >>THE CLERK: YES, THEY CAN SEE IT.

08:42:00 >> I WAS NOT AWARE OF WHAT YOU WERE SEEING SO I WILL MOVE

08:42:05 FORWARD.

08:42:06 22 TREES ARE BEING REMOVED BUT OF THOSE 22 TREES, 20 ARE

08:42:09 PALMS, WHICH IS WHY THEY DON'T HAVE MUCH OF AN AERIAL

08:42:13 SIGNATURE AS NOTED BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.

08:42:17 THIS IS RELEVANT BECAUSE UNLIKE LARGE TREES WHICH CAN

08:42:20 TAKE YEARS TO REACH MATURITY, MATURE PALMS CAN BE

08:42:24 RESTORED ALMOST INSTANTLY WITH NEW PLANTED PALMS.

08:42:29 ALSO, THE CODE SECTION ABOUT MINIMUM TREE PRESERVATION

08:42:33 INCLUDES A FOOTNOTE THAT SAYS IT SHALL NOT APPLY WHEN




08:42:36 THERE ARE NOT AN ADEQUATE NUMBER OF TREES ON-SITE IN GOOD

08:42:41 OR EXCELLENT CONDITION.

08:42:42 SINCE THE SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED, AND THE CANOPY

08:42:44 WAS ALMOST COMPLETELY PALM TREES, WE WERE INITIALLY UNDER

08:42:47 THE IMPRESSION THAT THIS RETENTION REQUIREMENT WOULD NOT

08:42:51 APPLY BECAUSE THERE WAS NOT AN ADEQUATE -- TREES ON THE

08:42:55 SITE. IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, WE ARE REQUESTING THE

08:42:57 WAIVER ANYWAY.

08:43:00 ALSO, IF WE ONLY CONSIDERED THE TREES IN EXCELLENT OR

08:43:08 GOOD CONDITION AS THE FOOTNOTE STATES THEN THE WAIVER IS

08:43:11 NOT NECESSARY BECAUSE WE EXCEED 50%.

08:43:13 AGAIN, THIS WHAT Q WAS MADE IN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION.

08:43:17 THIS IS AT THE CUSP OF THE NEW TREE CODE AND THINGS WERE

08:43:22 STILL WORKING OUT SO WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE.

08:43:27 THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

08:43:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:43:29 WHO IS NEXT?

08:43:30 >> KAMI CORBETT AGAIN FOR THE RECORD IF I COULD SHARE MY

08:43:33 SCREEN AGAIN, PLEASE.

08:43:34 >>KAMI CORBETT: THAT WAS MR. PETERIKA'S SCREEN.

08:43:51 THERE WE GO.

08:43:52 >> IS THAT YOUR SCREEN?

08:44:01 >>KAMI CORBETT: YES.

08:44:02 BUT I NEED TO GET BACK TO --

08:44:09 >>> OKAY.




08:44:10 >>KAMI CORBETT: MR. PETERIKA DID A GREAT JOB COVERING

08:44:13 THE NEW WAIVER REQUEST AND CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THERE

08:44:16 WILL BE NO HARM TO THE PUBLIC AS A RESULT OF THIS WAIVER,

08:44:19 AND THAT THE INTENT OF THE CODE REALLY PROBABLY CAPTURES

08:44:23 THIS SITE WHERE THE SO-CALLED TREE CANOPY IS COMPRISED OF

08:44:27 EXISTING LANDSCAPING PALMS AND OTHERWISE COMPLETELY

08:44:32 BARREN SURFACE LOTS, AND THE REDESIGN OF THIS SITE AND

08:44:35 THE GRANTING OF THE WAIVER WILL RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL

08:44:38 JUSTICE BEING SERVED.

08:44:42 TO SUMMARIZE, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION AND GROWTH

08:44:45 MANAGEMENT STAFF BOTH DETERMINED THAT THIS PROPOSED PD IS

08:44:49 COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CONSISTENT

08:44:52 WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CONSISTENT WITH YOUR LAND

08:44:54 DEVELOPMENT CODE.

08:44:58 SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY FROM MR. COEN AND MR.

08:45:03 PETERIKA CLEARLY CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT

08:45:06 EVIDENCE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS BURDEN THAT THE

08:45:09 PROPOSED PD PLAN IS COMPARABLE WITH THE PLAN AND LAND

08:45:13 DEVELOPMENT CODE AND WITH THAT I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST

08:45:15 YOUR APPROVAL, AND LIKE TO RESERVE ANY REMAINING TIME FOR

08:45:20 REBUTTAL, IF NECESSARY.

08:45:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:45:24 THAT WHOLE PRESENTATION FOR A TREE WAIVER, ESSENTIALLY.

08:45:29 OKAY.

08:45:29 ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?




08:45:32 ALL RIGHT.

08:45:35 FATHER, I SEE YOU ARE REGISTERED PUBLIC COMMENTS.

08:45:38 DOES THIS HAVE YOUR BLESSING?

08:45:40 >> IT DOES INDEED.

08:45:41 WE HAVE WORKED HARD AT CHRIST THE KING TO IMPROVE OUR

08:45:44 PROPERTY AND I THINK THIS WILL CONTINUE JUST SOUTH OF US.

08:45:49 I THINK IT'S A GREAT THING FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, FOR

08:45:53 SOUTH TAMPA HERE, AND JUST PRETTY MUCH IN SUPPORT OF IT,

08:45:56 AND WE RECOMMEND YOUR APPROVAL.

08:45:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:46:00 COUNCILMAN CITRO.

08:46:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I SAY THIS IN JUST.

08:46:06 I THINK IT'S PRETTY UNFAIR THAT YOU BRING IN SOMEBODY

08:46:08 THAT HAS A CLOSE PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A HIGHER

08:46:11 POWER.

08:46:12 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

08:46:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.

08:46:16 DO YOU HAVE ANY REBUTTAL, MS. CORBETT?

08:46:21 >>KAMI CORBETT: I DO NOT IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS OR

08:46:24 OTHER COMMENTS THAT I NEED TO ADDRESS.

08:46:25 I DO NOT.

08:46:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.

08:46:27 CAN WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?

08:46:29 MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.

08:46:31 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.




08:46:32 ALL IN FAVOR?

08:46:34 COUNCILMAN CARLSON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ ITEM NUMBER 6?

08:46:37 >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE REZ 20-65, AN

08:46:48 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING

08:46:49 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE

08:46:51 GENERAL VICINITY OF 3815 AND 3825 HENDERSON BOULEVARD,

08:46:57 1002 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE AND 3816 WEST MORRISON AVENUE,

08:47:02 CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED

08:47:04 IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD

08:47:07 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE, BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL AND

08:47:10 MEDICAL, ADULT, EDUCATION, BANK, WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW,

08:47:15 RETAIL SALES, RESIDENTIAL, DAYCARE, AND POST OFFICE TO

08:47:18 PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL

08:47:20 AND MEDICAL, COLLEGE, BUSINESS VOCATIONAL SCHOOL, BANK

08:47:25 WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW, DAYCARE, ALL COMMERCIAL GENERAL

08:47:28 USES AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, PROVIDING AN

08:47:30 EFFECTIVE DATE, AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF

08:47:34 PARAGRAPH, AND THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE

08:47:40 FOUND THIS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH CODE AND THE

08:47:44 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

08:47:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.

08:47:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.

08:47:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY.

08:47:51 I WAS GOING TO SAY, AND INCLUDED IN THE MOTION THE

08:47:54 CORRECTIONS TO THE WAIVER BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND




08:47:56 READING?

08:47:57 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

08:47:58 ADD THAT, PLEASE.

08:47:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN

08:48:01 CARLSON WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER CITRO.

08:48:03 ROLL CALL VOTE.

08:48:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

08:48:06 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

08:48:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

08:48:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

08:48:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

08:48:21 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

08:48:23 >> YES.

08:48:24 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

08:48:26 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON APRIL 1st

08:48:28 AT 9:30 A.M.

08:48:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:48:31 THAT CONCLUDES THE AGENDA.

08:48:33 WE DID NEW BUSINESS AT THE BEGINNING WITH THE EXCEPTION

08:48:36 OF COUNCILMEMBER DINGFELDER.

08:48:38 DID YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, SIR?

08:48:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, I AM GOOD.

08:48:42 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

08:48:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.

08:48:45 SEEING -- YES, MR. MIRANDA.




08:48:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I HAVE LATE BREAKING NEWS UNDER NEW

08:48:51 BUSINESS.

08:48:52 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION

08:48:54 TO MS. JUDY -- WHO RECENTLY RETIRED FOR OVER FOUR DECADE

08:49:00 HAS WORKED WITH THE CITY CLERK PART TIME, SHE'S THE

08:49:04 LONGEST SERVING EMPLOYEE IN THE DEPARTMENT'S HISTORY.

08:49:08 I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT THIS COMMENDATION AT A CITY

08:49:10 COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 1st, THE YEAR 2021.

08:49:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN

08:49:16 MIRANDA.

08:49:16 A SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CITRO.

08:49:18 ALL IN FAVOR?

08:49:19 YAY.

08:49:20 ANY OPPOSED?

08:49:23 ALL RIGHT.

08:49:27 DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, FATHER LEN?

08:49:29 NO?

08:49:30 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:49:32 WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN CITRO,

08:49:35 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.

08:49:37 ALL IN FAVOR?

08:49:37 ALL RIGHT.

08:49:38 WE ARE ADJOURNED.

08:49:38 [SOUNDING GAVEL]

08:49:57 (CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED).




08:50:36

DISCLAIMER:

THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.