TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2021
6:00 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
18:02:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.
18:02:37 I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL EVENING
18:02:38 MEETING TO ORDER.
18:02:39 ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:02:42 ROLL CALL PLEASE.
18:02:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
18:02:48 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
18:02:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
18:02:52 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
18:02:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
18:02:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
18:02:59 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT.
18:03:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY.
18:03:04 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, MR. CHAIRMAN, GOOD EVENING.
18:03:08 MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
18:03:13 WE ARE HERE AT OLD CITY HALL, 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
18:03:17 TONIGHT'S QUASI-JUDICIAL AND LAND USE MEETING IS BEING
18:03:20 HELD THROUGH THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY AND BEING CONDUCTED
18:03:26 LIVE AS YOU HEARD WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM PRESENT IN
18:03:28 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
18:03:32 AND IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE
18:03:37 ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE VIA VIDEO TELECONFERENCE AND
18:03:40 MEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR CMT.
18:03:43 THESE MEETINGS ARE HELD WITH THE EMERGENCY RULES OF
18:03:56 PROCEDURE 2020-225 AMENDED BY 2020-490 AND 2021-241.
18:03:59 THE PUBLIC AND THE CITY OF TAMPA CITIZENS ARE ABLE TO
18:04:02 WATCH THIS MEETING AND VIEW IT ON SPECTRUM 640,
18:04:06 FRONTIER CHANNEL 15, AND LIVE ON THE INTERNET AT
18:04:11 WWW.TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
18:04:15 NOW BECAUSE THERE ARE MULTIPLE WAYS TO PARTICIPATE, I
18:04:17 WILL GO THROUGH THEM BRIEFLY.
18:04:21 COUNCIL AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, FOR THOSE WHO WANT
18:04:25 TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY USING CMT, IT IS NECESSARY TO
18:04:27 PREREGISTER FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THIS
18:04:33 INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
18:04:37 Q-U-A-S-I.
18:04:40 NOW WITH REGARD TO THE DEVICE YOU NEED TO PARTICIPATE
18:04:43 REMOTELY, IT MUST HAVE EITHER A TABLET OR A COMPUTER
18:04:46 EQUIPPED WITH A CAMERA OR MICROPHONE.
18:04:49 CELL PHONES AND SMARTPHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE FOR
18:04:52 QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS AS THEY WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO
18:04:54 SHARE YOUR CAMERA WHEN CONNECTED.
18:04:57 AND AGAIN FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE ABILITY TO
18:05:01 PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC HEARINGS VIA CMT INCLUDING THE
18:05:05 LINK TO REGISTRATION FORMS AND DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS
18:05:09 TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
18:05:13 ALSO WAYS TO COMMUNICATE VIA E-MAIL AT
18:05:16 COUNCILQUASISUBMISSIONS -- EXCUSE ME,
18:05:22 QUASICOUNCILSUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.GOV OR BY U.S. MAIL.
18:05:25 FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC, PARTICULARLY THE
18:05:36 APPLICANTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS WHO ELECT TO SUBMIT
18:05:38 EVIDENCE DURING THE TIME OF THE HEARING MUST SUBMIT A
18:05:41 COMPLETE ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL DOCUMENTS PRESENTED
18:05:43 DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING TO
18:05:50 COUNCILQUASISUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.GOV WITHIN 24 HOURS AT
18:05:52 THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING.
18:05:54 NOW IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE
18:06:00 REMOTELY FOR USING A CMT DEVICE, YOU CAN USE FACILITIES
18:06:04 THAT ARE MADE AVAILABLE HERE AT THE PUBLIC WHERE YOU
18:06:07 CAN VIEW THE MEETING AND PARTICIPATE AT OLD CITY HALL,
18:06:10 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, ON SECOND FLOOR.
18:06:12 PLEASE NOTE THE USE OF MASK AND SOCIAL DISTANCING
18:06:15 INSIDE THE BUILDING ARE REQUIRED.
18:06:17 WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS MAY BE ACCESSED
18:06:22 FOR THE PUBLIC TO VIEW AT TAMPA.GOV/AGENDAS.
18:06:25 NOW WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED BY MAIL OR E-MAIL HAVE
18:06:28 BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL AND ALSO WILL BE
18:06:31 INCLUDED IN THE PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEETING.
18:06:38 ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED BY MAIL, E-MAIL OR VIA CMT
18:06:41 WILL BE AFFORD EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE PUBLIC
18:06:42 COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON.
18:06:44 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:06:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SHELBY.
18:06:50 BEFORE WE BEGIN THE AGENDA, I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER TO
18:06:53 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER WHO WOULD LIKE TO SAY FEW WORDS.
18:06:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
18:06:57 EVENING, COUNCIL.
18:07:02 WITH A HEAVY HEART THAT I ASK COUNCIL TO PROVIDE A
18:07:06 POSTHUMOUS COMMENDATION TO OUR GOOD FRIEND, JIM REESE.
18:07:11 JIMMY REESE, ALSO KNOWN AS COACH, SERVED THIS COUNCIL
18:07:19 AND THIS CITY AND MY OFFICE AS WELL AS YOLIE CAPIN AS A
18:07:22 LEGISLATIVE AGE FOR A NUMBER YEARS, BUT EARLIER IN
18:07:26 LIFE, JIMMY WAS A STAR QUARTERBACK FOR THE UNIVERSITY
18:07:29 OF MINNESOTA GOLDEN GOPHERS BACK IN THE 1950S.
18:07:33 AT SOME POINT HE TOOK ON THE NAME "COACH" AND IT STUCK
18:07:35 WITH HIM OVER THE YEARS.
18:07:40 JIM GREW UP IN NEW YORK AND EVENTUALLY ENDED UP ON LONG
18:07:44 ISLAND, RAISED A WONDERFUL FAMILY, HIS WIFE PEGGY AND
18:07:46 HIS THREE CHILDREN, ONE GRANDCHILD.
18:07:49 ULTIMATELY HE WAS INVOLVED IN CITY GOVERNMENT.
18:07:54 HE WAS THE MAYOR OF PATCHHOG, NEW YORK, IN LONG ISLAND.
18:07:57 JIM IS THE KIND OF GUY WHO NEVER MET A STRANGER.
18:08:00 I THINK PRETTY MUCH ALL OF YOU KNEW HIM IN SOME
18:08:02 CAPACITY.
18:08:05 IN HIS FINAL YEARS, HE LOVED TO HOLD COURT OVER AT
18:08:07 OXFORD EXCHANGE.
18:08:09 AND HE HAD HIS CHAIR THERE.
18:08:13 AND NO MATTER WHO CAME BY, HE HAD A CONVERSATION, HE
18:08:16 HAD A CHAT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I THINK THAT IS HOW YOU GOT
18:08:18 TO KNOW HIM PRETTY WELL.
18:08:21 AND BILL CARLSON, YOU AS WELL.
18:08:24 BUT ANYWAY, THE FAMILY IS GOING TO DO THEIR OWN SERVICE
18:08:29 COMING UP PRETTY SOON, BUT IN THE COMMUNITY, THE FOLKS
18:08:34 OVER AT OXFORD EXCHANGE ARE -- JIMMY WAS IRISH
18:08:36 OBVIOUSLY, JIMMY REESE.
18:08:39 AND THEY WILL DO SOME FORM OF A WAKE AND PUT HIS
18:08:43 PHOTOGRAPH UP ON THE WALL, AND THEY ARE GOING TO PUT A
18:08:44 NAME PLAQUE ON HIS CHAIR.
18:08:48 AND IT WILL FOREVER BE JIM -- COACH JIM REESE'S CHAIR.
18:08:52 WITH THAT, COUNCIL, I WOULD LIKE TO DO A COMMENDATION
18:08:56 AND TAKE IT OVER TO OXFORD EXCHANGE THAT EVENING.
18:08:59 AND I THINK WE HAVE THE DATE.
18:09:01 I'LL ANNOUNCE IT LATER IN THE MEETING.
18:09:03 I THINK IT IS ABOUT A MONTH FROM NOW.
18:09:08 SO WITH THAT, A MOTION FOR COMMENDATION.
18:09:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND, COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:09:11 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:09:13 AYE.
18:09:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:09:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE RIGHT.
18:09:19 HE HAD HIS CHAIR AT THE OXFORD EXCHANGE.
18:09:25 AND IF I WOULD AUTOMATICALLY GET UP AND PASS IT ON TO
18:09:25 HIM.
18:09:29 ALWAYS NICE MAN AND HOW I GOT TO KNOW HIM AND HAD MANY
18:09:31 CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM.
18:09:32 COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
18:09:33 >>BILL CARLSON: JUST QUICKLY.
18:09:36 I SAW HIM -- I WENT TO OXFORD ALMOST EVERY DAY BEFORE
18:09:39 THE PANDEMIC, AND I WOULD SEE HIM THERE.
18:09:42 AND WE ALWAYS WAVE AND SAY HI.
18:09:45 HE ONE DAY SAID ARE YOU EVER GOING TO SIT DOWN AND TALK
18:09:47 TO ME.
18:09:48 I SAT DOWN AND TALKED TO HIM.
18:09:52 I DIDN'T KNOW HIS BACKGROUND WORK AND CONNECTED TO
18:09:56 YOLIE AND YOU AND HE SPENT HOURS AND HOURS WITH ME AS I
18:09:59 BECAME CITY COUNCILMEMBER TALKING OF THE BACKGROUND
18:10:02 WORK OF CITY COUNCIL AND HOW THINGS WORKED AND IF I
18:10:06 HAVE A QUESTION OF SOMETHING -- I AM STILL A NOVICE OF
18:10:06 ALL OF THIS.
18:10:09 I COULD RUN OVER TO HIM AND ASK HIM A QUESTION, AND HE
18:10:11 GIVE ME ALL THE ANSWERS TO WHAT WAS GOING ON.
18:10:14 SO I WAS THERE YESTERDAY AND I SAW HIS EMPTY CHAIR, AND
18:10:16 IT IS GOING TO BE REALLY SAD NOT HAVING HIM THERE
18:10:18 ANYMORE.
18:10:18 THANK YOU.
18:10:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.
18:10:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, HE WAS THE SUPERHUMAN BEING.
18:10:28 FRIENDLIEST MAN THAT I EVER MET.
18:10:32 GIVE YOU ADVICE ALL THE TIME, WHETHER YOU NEEDED IT OR
18:10:34 NOT, BUT HE WANTED YOU TO HAVE IT.
18:10:37 I NEVER HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HIM AT OXFORD EXCHANGE,
18:10:41 BUT I SHARED TRIVIA NIGHT WITH HIM MANY, MANY NIGHTS AT
18:10:44 BEEF O BRADY'S ON SOUTH MACDILL.
18:10:46 AGAIN, BRILLIANT MAN.
18:10:48 KNEW HIS TRIVIA.
18:10:49 AND HE WILL BE MISSED.
18:10:50 JOHN, YOU ARE CORRECT.
18:10:52 ONE HECK OF A HUMAN BEING.
18:10:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN -- THANK YOU, JOE.
18:10:56 THANK ALL OF YOU.
18:11:00 I JUST FOUND IN MY CALENDAR THE -- THIS EVENT OVER AT
18:11:03 OXFORD AND REALLY EVERYBODY IS INVITED.
18:11:05 ANYBODY WHO KNEW JIM.
18:11:09 IT WILL BE APRIL 27 AT 7 P.M.
18:11:11 AND WE WILL MISS HIM GREATLY.
18:11:14 THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND WORDS, AND I KNOW THE FAMILY
18:11:15 APPRECIATES IT.
18:11:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:11:18 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:11:20 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:11:21 I CAN SAY THIS.
18:11:22 I CAN ECHO EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID.
18:11:27 HE WAS AN INDIVIDUAL THAT NEVER RAISED HIS VOICE.
18:11:32 AND HE JUST SAID HIS PEACE AND YOU KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE
18:11:33 SAID.
18:11:36 EVERY WORD HAD A MEANING, AND THAT IS WHAT I REMEMBER
18:11:37 HIM THE MOST.
18:11:40 HE WAS A VERY CORDIAL INDIVIDUAL.
18:11:43 VERY WELL-MANNERED AND BESIDE BEING A VERY GOOD ATHLETE
18:11:45 A GREAT HUMAN BEING.
18:11:49 MY FEELING ABOUT HIM.
18:11:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
18:11:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
18:11:58 A MOTION TO OPEN 1-11.
18:12:02 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN
18:12:03 CITRO.
18:12:07 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE WE BEGIN WITH
18:12:09 TONIGHT'S MEETING, DO YOU HAVE ANY EX-PARTE
18:12:13 COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE THOSE HOPEFULLY AT THE START
18:12:15 OF THE MEETING.
18:12:18 AND THERE HAVE BEEN ITEMS UPLOADED FOR PUBLIC
18:12:21 INSPECTION AS I SAID EARLIER, AND I WOULD LIKE FOR THEM
18:12:23 TO BE RECEIVED AND FILED BY MOTION NOW.
18:12:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:12:26 SECOND?
18:12:28 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
18:12:29 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:12:30 ALL RIGHT.
18:12:34 WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 1.
18:12:35 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES.
18:12:36 GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
18:12:45 THIS IS LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:12:51 OUR NEW STAFF MEMBER, ZANE HUSSEIN IS ON THE LINE.
18:12:54 ZANE STARTED WITH US SIX WEEKS AGO.
18:12:59 HE IS AN URBAN PLANNER AND WILL PROCESS ALCOHOLIC
18:13:01 BEVERAGE PERMITS.
18:13:03 ZANE COMES WITH SEVEN YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH URBAN
18:13:04 PLANNING.
18:13:07 WE ARE CERTAINLY HAPPY TO HAVE HIM ON OUR TEAM.
18:13:09 AND ZANE WILL PRESENT A COUPLE OF CASES FOR YOU THIS
18:13:10 EVENING.
18:13:13 SO I WANTED TO MAKE THAT INTRODUCTION TO YOU FOR
18:13:13 TONIGHT.
18:13:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELCOME ON BOARD, SIR.
18:13:17 >> THANK YOU.
18:13:18 GREAT TO BE HERE.
18:13:19 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
18:13:21 IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN.
18:13:29 WE WILL GO AHEAD AND GET TO ITEM NUMBER ONE.
18:13:30 LACHONE DOCK.
18:13:37 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH, COUNCIL.
18:13:42 FILE NO. REZ-20-92, A CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR 5430
18:13:46 AND 5440 W. TYSON AVENUE.
18:13:51 JUST AS A REMINDER, COUNCIL, THIS REQUEST WAS TO
18:13:52 REZONE.
18:13:56 AND THIS IS FROM IH, INDUSTRIAL HEAVY TO PD, PLANNED
18:14:01 DEVELOPMENT.
18:14:06 SO THE CASE WAS BEFORE YOU ON FEBRUARY 11 IN RESPONSE
18:14:10 TO COUNCIL COMMENTS AT THE FEBRUARY 11 PUBLIC HEARING,
18:14:13 AT THAT MEETING, ALONG WITH MEETINGS THAT WERE HELD
18:14:16 WITH THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS, THE APPLICANT HAS MADE
18:14:22 QUITE A FEW REVISIONS ON THEIR SITE PLAN, WHICH HAS
18:14:23 BEEN SUBMITTED TO OUR OFFICE.
18:14:25 SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW
18:14:29 WITH YOU, AND THESE ARE THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO
18:14:30 THE SITE PLAN.
18:14:34 ONE WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE CONCERNS REGARDING THE
18:14:35 PROJECT'S DENSITY.
18:14:38 THE APPLICANT HAS REDUCED THE NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY
18:14:42 UNITS FROM 650 TO 495 UNITS.
18:14:48 THIS HAS CHANGED THE PROJECT'S F.A.R. FROM .88 TO .80.
18:14:51 AND THIS IS ALSO REDUCED THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL
18:14:53 BUILDINGS FROM FIVE TO THREE.
18:14:57 I WILL SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN SHORTLY THAT WAS
18:14:58 SUBMITTED.
18:15:02 THE APPLICANT HAS INCREASED THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL
18:15:07 SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT HAS BEEN INCREASED FROM 5,000
18:15:10 SQUARE FEET TO 14,000 SQUARE FEET.
18:15:13 AND TWO COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS ON THE SITE.
18:15:17 SO THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE 14,000 SQUARE FEET IS
18:15:20 SPLIT BETWEEN TWO LOCATIONS ON-SITE, AND I WILL
18:15:23 INDICATE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN, I WILL SHOW TO YOU
18:15:25 MOMENTARILY AND THEY HAVE INCREASED THE SIZE OF THE
18:15:27 CLUBHOUSE.
18:15:30 THERE WERE ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE
18:15:33 SITE PLAN, AND THESE WERE AS A RESULT -- SOME OF THEM
18:15:37 WAS A RESULT OF THE BUILDING PLACEMENT.
18:15:43 AND THESE ARE RELOCATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE AREA.
18:15:46 THEY ALSO ADDED CONCEPTUAL PROPERTY LINES TO THE SITE
18:15:50 PLAN TO INDICATE THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL SPACES,
18:15:53 ADDED A SECONDARY EGRESS FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS,
18:15:57 RELOCATED THE PARKING, MODIFIED THE RESIDENTIAL PHASE
18:16:01 LINE ON THE SITE PLAN, ADDED ACCESS POINT WHICH SERVES
18:16:04 THE COMMERCIAL USE, AND UPDATED THE GREEN SPACE AND
18:16:06 TREE COUNTS.
18:16:09 SO WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW TO YOU NOW THE REVISED
18:16:11 SITE PLAN.
18:16:16 THIS CONTAINS THE SITE DATA, BUT THIS IS THE SITE PLAN
18:16:19 THAT WAS REVISED AND SUBMITTED.
18:16:22 SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS IN THIS AREA IDENTIFIED IN
18:16:28 THE ORANGE, THERE IS THE 8,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT
18:16:31 OR RETAIL SPACE LOCATED HERE IN THE NORTHWEST PORTION
18:16:32 OF THE SITE.
18:16:36 ALSO LOCATED HERE IN THE AREA IDENTIFIED IN PURPLE IS
18:16:39 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT OR RETAIL.
18:16:43 SO THOSE -- THAT WAS THE ADDITIONAL AREAS ADDED FOR
18:16:43 COMMERCIAL.
18:16:48 THESE ARE THE ACCESS POINTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
18:16:51 OF THE SITE.
18:16:54 AND THEN HERE ARE THE PLACEMENTS OF THE THREE BUILDINGS
18:16:56 THAT YOU WILL SEE.
18:16:56 ON-SITE.
18:16:59 AND THE AMENITY AND THE CLUBHOUSE HAS BEEN LOCATED
18:17:02 HERE.
18:17:05 JUST SOUTH OF THIS RESTAURANT --
18:17:07 >>CATE WELLS: THIS IS CATE.
18:17:10 WE HAVE LOST YOUR SHARED SCREEN CAPABILITY.
18:17:13 WE CAN'T SEE THE SITE PLAN ANYMORE.
18:17:15 >>LACHONE DOCK: I APOLOGIZE.
18:17:16 IS IT UP NOW?
18:17:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:17:19 >>LACHONE DOCK: SORRY.
18:17:20 THANK YOU.
18:17:22 THE RESTAURANT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH YOU WERE ABLE
18:17:26 TO SEE, SO I WILL GO OVER, THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL
18:17:28 COMPONENT HAVE BEEN SPLIT ON THE SITE.
18:17:31 THE FIRST AREA IN THE ORANGE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
18:17:32 THE SITE.
18:17:35 AND THEN THIS IS THE OTHER AREA OF RESTAURANT, RETAIL
18:17:38 AND THIS AREA IDENTIFIED IN THE PURPLE.
18:17:43 AND THIS IS 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT OR RETAIL.
18:17:50 THE ACCESS POINTS ARE AT THE THAT ARE LOCATED ON-SITE.
18:17:53 THIS IS THE ACCESS POINT TO THE COMMERCIAL.
18:17:56 AND THEN THE AREAS THAT ARE IN GRAY ARE THE BUILDING
18:17:57 PLACEMENTS.
18:18:00 AND THESE ARE THE THREE BUILDINGS PROPOSED.
18:18:06 THE CLUBHOUSE AMENITY AREA IS LOCATED IN THIS PART OF
18:18:12 THE SITE.
18:18:20 SO THAT IS THE PREVIOUS PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED JUST TO
18:18:23 SHOW TO YOU -- SO COUNCIL, AS A REMINDER, STAFF
18:18:28 REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
18:18:31 MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST
18:18:39 AND SECOND READINGS, AND JUST A REMINDER, IN RESPONSE
18:18:43 TO CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY REQUESTED CHANGES AND
18:18:48 SOME WERE FOR ITEMS LIKE SOLID WASTE FOR FUNCTIONALITY
18:18:51 OF THE SITE.
18:18:55 WE DO AGREE WITH THESE AND WILL SUBMIT THE REVISION
18:18:59 SHEET FROM THE RECORD.
18:19:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:19:01 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?
18:19:04 I SEE -- COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
18:19:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
18:19:07 MISS DOCK?
18:19:09 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES.
18:19:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GOOD EVENING.
18:19:14 >>LACHONE DOCK: GOOD EVENING.
18:19:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE COMP PLAN CATEGORY FOR THIS
18:19:22 PARCEL IS WHAT?
18:19:26 >>LACHONE DOCK: THE FUTURE LAND USE?
18:19:27 DINGFELDER CREME.
18:19:29 >>LACHONE DOCK: CMU-35, I BELIEVE.
18:19:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CMU-35.
18:19:37 AND -- HOW MANY ACRES IS THE TOTAL PARCEL?
18:19:38 APPROXIMATELY?
18:19:40 >>LACHONE DOCK: LET ME GO BACK.
18:19:45 HOLD ON JUST A SECOND.
18:19:52 YES CMU-35, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
18:19:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THE TOTAL ACRES IS
18:20:06 APPROXIMATELY WHAT?
18:20:11 >>LACHONE DOCK: HOLD ON JUST A SECOND.
18:20:14 18.54.
18:20:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 18 AND A HALF?
18:20:20 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, 18 AND A HALF ACRES.
18:20:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO TYPICALLY IF SOMETHING IS LIKE
18:20:29 -- HAS 35 -- THAT MEANS 35 UNITS PER ACRE AND MULTIPLY
18:20:34 THAT BY 18 AND A HALF, LET'S SEE.
18:20:46 HOLD ON.
18:20:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 647, I BELIEVE.
18:20:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO 647 AND THEY ARE COMING DOWN TO
18:20:59 THE 495, IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING?
18:21:01 >>LACHONE DOCK: CORRECT.
18:21:04 THEY WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF 495 UNITS FROM 650.
18:21:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND WHERE ARE THOSE THREE BUILDINGS
18:21:11 AS RELATED -- I WAS HAVING TROUBLE ORIENTED MYSELF.
18:21:14 WHERE ARE THOSE THREE BUILDINGS RELATED TO THE CHLORINE
18:21:19 PLANT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE LAST TIME?
18:21:25 >>LACHONE DOCK: SO THIS IS -- LET ME -- LET ME BRING
18:21:42 UP THE ACTUAL AERIAL OF THIS SITE.
18:21:46 >> SO THIS IS THE SITE OUTLINED ON RED ON THE AERIAL
18:21:49 AND THE BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THIS PORTION OF
18:21:52 THE SITE AND ALONG THIS SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE SITE.
18:21:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:21:56 SO LOOKED TO ME PERHAPS THE RESTAURANT WAS CLOSER TO
18:21:59 THE CHLORINE PLANT?
18:22:02 >>LACHONE DOCK: TO THE NORTH IS ONE RESTAURANT RETAIL
18:22:09 COMPONENT AND NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE.
18:22:10 YES, CLOSER.
18:22:14 AND ONE RESTAURANT COMPONENT LOCATED TO THIS AREA HERE.
18:22:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE MISS BATSEL WILL GO INTO THAT
18:22:20 A LITTLE MORE.
18:22:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
18:22:30 MR. HEY, ARE YOU NEXT, SIR?
18:22:35 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
18:22:41 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:22:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WERE YOU SWORN IN, SIR?
18:22:47 >>DAVID HEY: WE REVIEWED THE MODIFICATIONS AND FIND IT
18:22:49 CONSISTENT.
18:22:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: RAISE YOUR HAND IF WE COULD AND
18:22:53 ANYBODY ON THE SCREEN.
18:22:59 MISS BATSEL AND MARTHA TOO.
18:23:02 [SWEARING IN]
18:23:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:23:05 NOTHING ELSE, MR. HEY?
18:23:07 >>DAVID HEY: NO, THAT'S IT FOR US.
18:23:10 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:23:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MISS DOCK, ANYTHING ELSE?
18:23:15 >>LACHONE DOCK: NOTHING ADDITIONAL, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:23:18 THANK YOU.
18:23:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ELISE BATSEL ON LINE.
18:23:24 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:23:27 MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, BEFORE WE START THE PRESENTATION, I
18:23:29 HAVE ONE HOUSEKEEPING MATTER.
18:23:33 I NEGLECTED TO NOTE ONE CHANGE I DIDN'T SHOW OVER TO
18:23:36 LACHONE, AND I WANT TO PUT THAT ON THE RECORD.
18:23:39 IN A RUSH TO GET A NEW PLAN TO THE CITY, WE NEGLECTED
18:23:41 TO UPDATE THE TRANSPORTATION NOTES ON THE PLAN.
18:23:54 THE UPDATED INTERSECTION IS IN THE RECORD AND INCLUDES
18:23:58 THE TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE AND ALSO ACCOUNTS FOR
18:24:00 OUR CROP SHARE PAYMENT.
18:24:02 WE HAVE AGREED TO PAY THAT EARLIER FOR THIS.
18:24:04 WE WILL PAY BOTH OF THOSE PAYMENTS, THE MITIGATION
18:24:09 PAYMENT AND THE CROP SHARE PAYMENT.
18:24:12 I WANTED TO NOTE THAT FOR THE RECORD AND MAKE SURE THAT
18:24:16 IS NOTED ON THE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
18:24:21 MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN THAT SAYS SUZANNE WALKER.
18:24:24 I DON'T THINK YOU LET THAT PANELIST IN AND THAT'S ON
18:24:26 OUR TEAM AS WELL, AND THAT'S WHERE I HAVE THE
18:24:32 POWERPOINT.
18:24:40 OKAY, GREAT.
18:24:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, WE SEE IT.
18:24:43 GO AHEAD.
18:24:49 >> ELISE BATSEL, STEARNS WEAVER MILLER ON BEHALF THE
18:24:50 APPLICANT.
18:24:53 IF YOU RECALL ON FEBRUARY 11, WE CAME BEFORE YOU FOR
18:24:58 THE PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
18:25:01 PENINSULA OF RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:25:08 IT IS A 18.85-ACRE PARCEL, AND AS WE DISCUSSED AND
18:25:12 HEARD MULTIPLE TIMES THAT RATTLESNAKE PARK IS AN AREA
18:25:16 TRANSITION FROM INDUSTRY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
18:25:17 MIXED USES.
18:25:21 DURING THE FEBRUARY HEARING, WE PRESENTED A PROJECT
18:25:23 THAT WAS MIXED USE EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT
18:25:28 IN THE COMP PLAN OR CODE THAT THIS IS APPLIED ON A
18:25:32 PROJECT-WIDE BASIS, THIS DID HAVE -- THIS PROJECT HAD
18:25:33 BOTH COMPONENTS.
18:25:36 WE PROVIDED A PUBLIC BOARDWALK TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE
18:25:39 WATER AND WE PROVIDED VISITOR BOAT SLIPS.
18:25:42 THERE WAS A LOT OF THOUGHT THAT WENT INTO THIS ORIGINAL
18:25:43 DESIGN.
18:25:46 THE DEVELOPER INCORPORATED MANY DEVELOPMENTS THAT WENT
18:25:49 ABOVE AND BEYOND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMP PLAN.
18:25:55 AND THE CODE, THE LAST HEARING, WE HAD TIME GO BACK AND
18:25:58 REALLY RETHINK A LOT OF THINGS ON THIS SITE PLAN.
18:26:02 WE WENT BACK AND TOOK A HARD LOOK AT THE DENSITY ISSUES
18:26:05 AND DESIGN ISSUES AND WE BELIEVE TODAY WE HAVE A MUCH
18:26:06 BETTER PROJECT.
18:26:09 WE ALSO HAD A MEETING WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF SOG
18:26:16 INCLUDING SHAWN BROWN, STEPHANIE PONYOR AND
18:26:24 KALI RENAULT AND MADE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS AFTER THOSE
18:26:25 MEETINGS.
18:26:27 I WOULD LIKE TO GO OVER THE MAJOR CHANGES TO THE SITE
18:26:30 PLAN.
18:26:34 AS LACHONE NOTED, THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IS THE
18:26:37 SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN DENSITY, AND THE SECOND IS THE
18:26:39 SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT.
18:26:43 SO YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SEE THIS A LITTLE BIT BETTER ON
18:26:44 THE COLORED SITE PLANS.
18:26:46 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER ASKED THE LOCATION OF THE
18:26:47 BUILDINGS.
18:26:52 THE -- IF YOU ON THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN, YOU WILL SEE
18:26:56 THE MODIFIED SITE PLAN AND TWO ENTIRE RESIDENTIAL
18:26:59 BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND WE HAVE TAKEN A NEW
18:27:02 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AND SHIFTED IT SOUTH -- YOU TOWARD
18:27:08 THE SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.
18:27:11 FROM A DENSITY PERSPECTIVE, WE WENT FROM 649
18:27:13 OPPORTUNITIES 495 UNITS.
18:27:18 THAT IS A 24% REDUCTION IN RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
18:27:24 WE WENT FROM 34.9 UNITS PER ACRE TO 26.68 UNITS PER
18:27:25 ACRE.
18:27:29 AGAIN, WE ELIMINATED TWO OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
18:27:29 BUILDINGS.
18:27:32 AND ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY, WE INCREASED THE COMMERCIAL
18:27:37 COMPONENT ON THE SITE PLAN FROM ONE 5,000-SQUARE-FOOT
18:27:40 RESTAURANTS TO TWO RESTAURANTS.
18:27:43 ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS IS 8,000 SQUARE FEET AND ONE
18:27:44 WILL BE 6,000 SQUARE FEET.
18:27:50 180% INCREASE IN THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
18:27:53 NOW YOU ARE PROBABLY ASKING US WHERE IN THE WORLD DID
18:27:56 WE COME UP WITH THAT DENSITY NUMBER.
18:27:59 WE ACTUALLY SLICED AND DICED THESE NUMBERS A NUMBER OF
18:27:59 WAYS.
18:28:03 WHEN WE TOOK -- WHEN WE WERE LAST AT THE HEARING, WE
18:28:06 TOOK THE PROJECTS THAT THIS COUNCIL CALLED OUT SOUTH OF
18:28:07 GANDY.
18:28:10 IF YOU RECALL, THESE ARE THE PROJECTS THAT THIS COUNCIL
18:28:13 HAS CONSIDERED SINCE TAKING OFFICE, THIS PARTICULAR
18:28:14 COUNCIL.
18:28:17 AND WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT AVERAGING THE NUMBER UNITS,
18:28:20 YOU MAY RECALL MY CONCERN WAS IF WE JUST AVERAGE THE
18:28:24 NUMBER OF UNITS, WE ARE NOT ACTUALLY COMPARING APPLES
18:28:25 TO APPLES.
18:28:29 SO WHAT WE DID IN THIS DENSITY STUDY TOOK THE
18:28:33 PERCENTAGE OF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY THE COMP PLAN AND
18:28:36 AVERAGED THAT AMOUNT TO COME OUT WITH AN AVERAGE.
18:28:38 SO IF YOU SEE, THE INTERBAY PROJECT WHICH IS -- WHICH
18:28:42 WAS APPROVED AT 22.99 ACRES.
18:28:47 THE MAX THERE WAS 24 UNITS PER ACRE AND APPROVED AT 96%
18:28:51 OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER THE COMP PLAN.
18:28:54 WE DID THE SAME FOR THE TYSON PROJECT.
18:28:57 WE DID THE SAME FOR THE TRASK PROJECT.
18:29:00 THE PERCENTAGE -- THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF THE MAXIMUM
18:29:02 WAS 9%.
18:29:05 WE APPLIED THAT AVERAGE TO OUR PROJECT, AND THAT'S HOW
18:29:09 WE CAME WITH OUR DENSITY OF 20 -- WE ARE AT 26.68,
18:29:14 SLIGHTLY UNDER THAT, BUT THAT -- THERE WAS A REASON TO
18:29:18 THE MADNESS, SO TO SPEAK.
18:29:22 WE ALSO KNOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION
18:29:26 AMONG STAFF, AMONG THE COMMUNITY, AMONG COUNCIL ABOUT
18:29:27 MIXED USE.
18:29:30 AND WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF MIXED USE.
18:29:32 AND I KNOW THAT STAFF IS POSSIBLY LOOKING AT REWRITING
18:29:35 THE SECTIONS OF THE CODE.
18:29:38 WHILE NONE OF US KNOW HOW THAT WILL COME OUT, WE REALLY
18:29:41 SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SQUARE
18:29:42 FOOTAGE ON THE SITE.
18:29:46 IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT UNDER THE COMP CODE AND
18:29:49 PLAN TODAY, EACH PROJECT IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE THAT
18:29:52 MIXED USE COMPONENT, BUT WE DID INTEGRATE THAT MIX OF
18:29:56 USES INTO THE PROJECT AND FURTHER ENHANCED THAT AS
18:30:01 FOLLOWS: FIRST, THE AREA YOU SEE IN ORANGE WAS THE
18:30:03 ORIGINAL 5,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT.
18:30:06 YOU WILL SEE THAT THE RESTAURANT HAS BEEN EXPANDED BY
18:30:11 3,000 SQUARE FEET AND THE OUTDOOR PATIO AREA HAVE ALSO
18:30:12 BEEN EXPANDED.
18:30:17 THE AREA IN PURPLE A SECOND RETAIL RESTAURANT POD WHERE
18:30:20 WE WILL HAVE A 6,000-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING.
18:30:24 THAT WILL BE A 6,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT/RETAIL
18:30:25 SPACE.
18:30:29 WE ALSO INCREASED THE PARKING PROVIDED FOR EACH OF
18:30:30 THESE AREAS.
18:30:33 ONE OF THE THINGS WE RECOGNIZE REGARDLESS CODE IS THERE
18:30:37 IS REALLY A PARKING ISSUE ON RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:30:41 SOME WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS OVERPARKED THE PUBLIC SPACES
18:30:46 SLIGHTLY TO HAVE 19 EXTRA SPACES TO PARK IN IF THEY ARE
18:30:50 VISITING THE BOARDWALK OR IF THEY ARE COMING TO OTHER
18:30:55 AREAS ON RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:30:58 I WANTED TO USE THIS GRAPHIC JUST TO REMIND YOU OF THE
18:31:04 PUBLIC SPACES AND THE OPEN SPACES ON THIS SITE.
18:31:07 IF YOU -- IF YOU LOOK AT ALL OF THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT
18:31:11 GRAYED OUT, THAT IS CONCEPTUALLY ALL OF THE SPACES OPEN
18:31:12 TO THE PUBLIC.
18:31:19 ALL OF THE PUBLIC AMENITY SPACES ON THE SITE.
18:31:23 WE DID A CALCULATION JUST TO SHOW YOU HOW MUCH IS THIS
18:31:24 MIXED USE.
18:31:27 WE TALKED ABOUT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES ALREADY.
18:31:31 BUT WE WANTED YOU TO SEE ON AN ACREAGE BASIS WHAT
18:31:34 PERCENTAGES WERE COMMITTED TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
18:31:34 THE SITE.
18:31:37 THE COMMERCIAL ACRES IF YOU LOOK AT RESTAURANT POD
18:31:41 NUMBER ONE AND RESTAURANT NUMBER TWO, WE HAVE DEDICATED
18:31:46 3.139 ACRES 17% OF THE TOTAL SITE AREA TO COMMERCIAL
18:31:47 USES.
18:31:49 IF YOU LOOK AT THE PUBLIC USE AREAS, THAT IS THE
18:31:53 BOARDWALK AND PUBLIC BOAT SLIPS.
18:31:58 THAT'S AN ADDITIONAL .446 ACRES OR 2% OF THE OVERALL
18:32:00 ACREAGE ON THE PROPERTY.
18:32:04 SO OUR TOTAL PERCENTAGE FOR NONRESIDENTIAL ON AN
18:32:11 ACREAGE BASIS 19% ON THIS REVISED PROJECT.
18:32:17 WAIVERS, THEY STILL HAVE NONE, WHICH IS REMARKABLE OR A
18:32:19 18.5-ACRE SITE.
18:32:22 WHEN YOU GO AND REDESIGN A PLAN LIKE WE DID
18:32:26 SIGNIFICANTLY A LOT OF THE CHANGES THAT LACHONE
18:32:29 MENTIONED ON THE REVISION LIST IS TO MOVE THINGS AROUND
18:32:33 TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING FITS EVEN THOUGH WE HAD
18:32:34 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES.
18:32:40 ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS BROUGHT UP BY MRS. POYNOR AT
18:32:44 THE LAST MEETING IS HOW FEMA REALLY WORKS IN THIS AREA.
18:32:49 CONCERN OF HOW BUILDINGS WILL BE CONSTRUCT AND WE
18:32:52 PROVIDED THIS GRAPHIC TO SHOW HOW VISUALLY THIS WORKS
18:32:54 IN A SIMPLE MANNER.
18:33:02 WE MET WITH MISS PONYOR AND CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AND
18:33:07 GIVE MORE DETAIL BUT I WILL GIVE A LAYMAN'S OVERVIEW.
18:33:11 WHAT HAPPENED -- YOU SEE THE ARROWS AT THE RESIDENTIAL
18:33:13 CENTER AND AMENITY CENTER.
18:33:16 THEY WILL BE HIGH ON A PODIUM AND PARKING UNDERNEATH.
18:33:20 IF YOU LOOK AT THE SMALL -- THE LITTLE CUTOUT WHERE YOU
18:33:23 SEE THE HOUSE IN THE LOWER RIGHT-HAND CORNER THE IDEA
18:33:28 THAT THEY ARE THEN ELEVATED FOR SAFETY ABOVE AREAS
18:33:32 WITHIN A 100-YEAR STORM THE WAVES MIGHT BE HIGHER.
18:33:35 THIS IS REALLY HOW ANY PROPERTY IN THIS AREA THROUGHOUT
18:33:39 THE CITY OF TAMPA WILL BE REQUIRED TO BUILD UNDER THE
18:33:42 NEW FEMA REGULATIONS AND NEW FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
18:33:47 REQUIREMENT.
18:33:50 AS YOU MAY REMEMBER, OBVIOUSLY ONE OF THE ISSUES WE
18:33:53 DISCUSSED IN THE LAST HEARING IS THE CHLORINE PLANT ON
18:33:56 RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:34:00 AFTER THE FIRST HEARING WE NEEDED OUR EXPERT MARTHA IRA
18:34:05 TO DO FURTHER STUDY ON CHEMICAL FORMULATORS ITSELF TO
18:34:07 GIVE COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY MORE INFORMATION ON THE
18:34:12 SAFETY MEASURES IN PLACE AT THE PLANT WITH THAT I WILL
18:34:18 TURN IT OVER TO MARTHA TO GIVE MORE COMMENTS ON THE
18:34:19 RECORD.
18:34:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
18:34:23 >> WE DID THE RESEARCH AS ELISE MENTIONED, AND WE FOUND
18:34:28 A REPORT THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATOR SUBMITTED TO THE EPA
18:34:31 INDICATED THAT THEY HAVE THE FOLLOWING SAFEGUARDS
18:34:32 INSTALLED AT THE SITE.
18:34:35 PRODUCTION BUILDING AND ENCLOSED PRODUCTION BUILDING TO
18:34:38 CONTAIN THE CHLORINE CONTAINER WITH A CHLORINE
18:34:42 SCRUBBER, A WATER DELUGE SYSTEM OVER THE CARS, A
18:34:45 CHLORINE DETECTOR IN THE PROCESS AREA AND AROUND THE
18:34:48 PERIMETER OF THE FACILITY, AND AN EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN
18:34:52 SYSTEM THAT IS TRIGGERED BY THE CHLORINE DETECTORS.
18:34:55 THESE DEVICES ARE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE THE LIKELIHOOD
18:34:57 OF A CHLORINE RELEASE.
18:35:00 THEY HAVE OPERATING AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES WITH
18:35:03 PERIODIC EMPLOYEE TRAINING.
18:35:04 THE SAFEGUARDS.
18:35:07 THE ENGINEERING SAFEGUARDS AND PRACTICES ARE
18:35:11 RECOMMENDED BY THE CHLORINE INSTITUTE AND COMPONENTS OF
18:35:16 THE OSHA AND EPA HAZARDOUS MATERIAL REGULATORY
18:35:19 COMPLIANCE PROGRAM THAT CHEMICAL REGULATOR HAVE
18:35:21 IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE.
18:35:25 WE FOUND AN ONLINE EPA COMPLIANCE DATABASE THAT SHOW NO
18:35:29 VIOLATIONS NOR SITE.
18:35:32 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MARTHA.
18:35:37 BEFORE WE CONCLUDE, WE DID WANT TO PROVIDE COUNCIL
18:35:41 WITH UPDATED RENDERING SINCE WE SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED
18:35:42 THE SITE LAYOUT.
18:35:45 WE WANTED TO SHOW HOW THIS SITE WILL LAY OUT FROM AN
18:35:47 AESTHETIC STANDPOINT.
18:35:49 THIS FIRST SLIDE FROM THE VIEW OF TYSON ROAD WHERE YOU
18:35:51 ENTER INTO THE PRIVATE EASEMENT AREA.
18:35:54 YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE CREATED THIS WALKABLE BOULEVARD
18:35:58 THAT INCLUDES BENCHES AND GREEN SPACE TO REALLY ENHANCE
18:35:59 THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.
18:36:02 THIS BOULEVARD ALSO PROVIDES AN ATTRACTIVE WAY FOR THE
18:36:05 PUBLIC TO ACTUALLY GET OUT TO THE WATERFRONT.
18:36:09 AND ALTHOUGH WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ANY TYPE OF
18:36:12 BOULEVARD SINCE THIS IS A PRIVATE EASEMENT, WE WANTED
18:36:15 TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROJECT WAS REALLY INTEGRATED NOT
18:36:17 ONLY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS BUT WITH THE ENTIRE
18:36:20 COMMUNITY OUT THERE.
18:36:23 THIS VIEW IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SAW DURING THE
18:36:24 FIRST HEARING.
18:36:27 THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH ALONG THE WATER ADJACENT
18:36:31 TO THE ORIGINAL RESTAURANT SITE.
18:36:33 IF YOU WERE FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA, THIS WILL BE
18:36:37 LOOKING SOUTH FROM SALT SHACK.
18:36:41 OUR VISION IS AN OPEN-AIR SEATING AREA WITH WATER VIEWS
18:36:43 FOR EVERYONE TO ENJOY.
18:36:45 YOU CAN SEE HOW THE PEDESTRIAN BOARDWALK IS GOING TO
18:36:46 LOOK.
18:36:49 AS YOU GO TO THE SOUTH, IT WILL WRAP ENTIRELY AROUND
18:36:52 THE WESTERN BORDER, THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND MOST OF THE
18:36:55 EASTERN BORDER ON THE WATER,IN FACT, I BELIEVE, WE HAVE
18:37:00 OVER 2,000 FEET OF LINEAR PUBLIC WALKWAY HERE,
18:37:04 BOARDWALK.
18:37:06 AGAIN, AS WE MENTIONED, THERE WILL BE DESIGNATED
18:37:13 VISITOR BOAT SLIPS TO ACCESS THE BOARDWALK AND THE
18:37:14 RESTAURANTS.
18:37:18 THE BOARDWALK AND PUBLIC BOAT SLIPS PROVIDE SOMETHING
18:37:18 IN SOUTH TAMPA.
18:37:24 NOT A LOT OF SPACES WHERE THE PUBLIC REALLY HAS TRUE
18:37:27 ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT AND HOPE THIS WILL BE AN
18:37:31 AMENITY NOT ONLY TO OUR RESIDENTS BUT TO THE PUBLIC AT
18:37:32 LARGE.
18:37:35 WE REALLY BELIEVE THIS IS GOING TO BE A MAGNIFICENT
18:37:38 PROJECT, AND WE WORKED VERY HARD SINCE FEBRUARY 11 TO
18:37:42 LISTEN TO EVERYTHING THAT COUNCIL SAID, TO LISTEN TO
18:37:44 THE INPUT THAT WE GOT FROM THE COMMUNITY AND THE
18:37:47 MEMBERS OF SOG.
18:37:49 BETWEEN THE FEBRUARY HEARING AND TONIGHT, WE HAVE
18:37:52 ALREADY PROVIDED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE
18:37:57 FORM OF EXPERT TESTIMONY AND WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT
18:37:59 WE MEET ALL OF THE APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE
18:38:02 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LDC.
18:38:04 YOUR STAFF HAS CONFIRMED THAT AGAIN THIS EVENING.
18:38:07 DURING THE FEBRUARY HEARING, WE ALSO PROVIDED COMPETENT
18:38:09 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO ADDRESS HURRICANE SHELTER
18:38:14 MITIGATION, QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHLORINE PLANTS,
18:38:18 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AND THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
18:38:21 IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ON THE ISSUE, WE
18:38:23 WILL BE HAPPY TO REPRESENT INFORMATION AND ANSWER ANY
18:38:25 ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
18:38:27 IN THE INTEREST OF TIME, WE THOUGHT WE WOULD WAIT FOR
18:38:29 QUESTIONS SINCE THAT IS ALREADY PART OF THE RECORD.
18:38:33 I ALSO WANTED TO REMIND YOU THAT THE DIRECT ADJACENT
18:38:36 NEIGHBORS HAVE ALL SUPPORTED --
18:38:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM.
18:38:40 >> THANK YOU.
18:38:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
18:38:44 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
18:38:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF
18:38:47 DUE PROCESS.
18:38:49 DID SHE NEED MUCH MORE TIME TO FINISH.
18:38:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU WANT ANOTHER 30 SECONDS.
18:38:53 >> SURE.
18:38:56 I ACTUALLY WAS JUST GOING TO SAY WE WERE JUST TRYING
18:38:59 NOTE THAT WE DO HAVE THE SUPPORT OF ALL THE DIRECT
18:39:01 IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH, TO THE EAST, VIPER
18:39:06 VENTURE, SALT SHACK, AND OLD DUTCH.
18:39:08 IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS ARE IN SUPPORT.
18:39:12 WE HAD TWO MEETINGS AND MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE
18:39:16 SOG LEADERSHIP, AND TRIED TO INCORPORATE MOST IF NOT
18:39:17 ALL OF THEIR CONCERNS.
18:39:22 AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AND OUR WHOLE
18:39:24 DEVELOPMENT TEAM IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
18:39:25 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
18:39:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
18:39:31 HEARING NONE.
18:39:36 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS HERE TO SPEAK
18:39:39 ON ITEM NUMBER 1?
18:39:42 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL, AILEEN
18:39:43 ROSARIO.
18:39:46 AND WE HAVE ONE PERSON HERE IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS
18:39:48 WILLING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
18:39:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:39:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WONDER -- I BELIEVE MISS -- I
18:39:55 BELIEVE THEY HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:39:57 SPEAKERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
18:39:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: EVERYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR HAVE
18:40:02 BEEN SWORN IN SO WE ARE GOOD TO GO WITH THE IN-PERSON
18:40:08 SPEAKERS.
18:40:17 CARROLL ANN BENNETT.
18:40:18 >> HOW DID YOU KNOW.
18:40:21 BEFORE YOU START TIMING ME, GIVE AN EXTRA 30, AND I
18:40:24 DON'T WANT TO GET CUT OFF MIDSENTENCE.
18:40:28 MY NAME IS CARROLL ANN BENNETT AND PREVENTING COMPETENT
18:40:31 AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE 2016 STAFF REPORTS
18:40:34 THAT RECOMMENDED AGAINST CHANGING THE COMP PLAN AND
18:40:37 PUTTING RESIDENTIAL UNIT NECK TO A HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL
18:40:38 PLANT.
18:40:41 BOTH THE CITY AND COUNTY STAFF SAID IT WAS DANGEROUS.
18:40:46 AT THAT MEETING, COUNCILMAN SUAREZ SAID IN FIVE YEARS
18:40:50 HE HAS NEVER BEFORE SEEN A TEXT AMENDMENT CALLED
18:40:50 DANGEROUS.
18:40:54 THESE ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE 2016 STAFF REPORTS.
18:40:56 CREATES A PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERN.
18:40:58 CLEARLY INCONSISTENT.
18:41:02 ONLY ONE POINT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS COULD POSE
18:41:05 POTENTIAL DANGER ESPECIALLY IF THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE
18:41:08 IS LOCATED BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE ONLY EXIT.
18:41:13 DOES NOT PROMOTE THE OVERALL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE
18:41:15 OF TAMPA RESIDENTS.
18:41:19 NOT APPROPRIATE UNTIL HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC USES ARE
18:41:20 PERMANENTLY REMOVED.
18:41:23 IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, THE ROAD WILL BE CLOSED
18:41:26 ISOLATING RESIDENTS AND POTENTIALLY PUTTING THEM AT
18:41:27 RISK.
18:41:29 NO INFORMATION ABOUT MEASURES THAT WOULD PROTECT
18:41:30 RESIDENTS.
18:41:33 THAT THIS LEAVES THAT ISSUE TO SUBSEQUENT REZONING
18:41:34 PHASE.
18:41:36 THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION OF MITIGATION METHODS
18:41:41 RATHER THAN SIMPLY DEFERRING TO THE REZONING PROCESS.
18:41:45 THE DISCUSSION AT THAT MEETING IS A LITTLE DISTURBING.
18:41:48 MUCH TALK OF THE DANGER OF RESIDENTS AND IF THEY WOULD
18:41:53 BE LIABLE FOR WHAT THEY DID IN 2016 OR IF THAT
18:41:56 LIABILITY WILL BE POSTPONED TO THE FUTURE TO THE
18:41:58 REZONING WHICH IS TODAY.
18:42:01 THEY GO SO FAR AS TO SAY THAT THE CITY CANNOT BE SUED
18:42:04 FOR PLANNING LEVEL DECISIONS, ONLY FOR PD REZONING
18:42:06 DECISIONS.
18:42:08 THEY SAID THE DANGER OF THE CHEMICAL PLANT AND THE
18:42:11 INGRESS AND EGRESS MUST BE CONSIDERED DURING THE
18:42:12 REZONING PROCESS.
18:42:19 YET AT THE FIRST RATTLESNAKE POINT, 5105 TYSON, CITY
18:42:21 COUNCIL WAS NOT MADE AWARE THAT THE CHEMICAL PLANT
18:42:23 EXISTED.
18:42:26 NO EVALUATION OR TESTIMONY FROM CITY CHEMICAL EMERGENCY
18:42:28 EXPERTS TO ADVISE COUNCIL.
18:42:32 SO YOU REALLY HAVE NO IDEA HOW DANGEROUS THIS IS.
18:42:34 THE CITY HAS NOT PRESENTED FACTS OR OPINIONS ABOUT THE
18:42:37 DANGER LEVEL, ONLY THE APPLICANT HAS.
18:42:40 EVEN THOUGH IT WAS CLEARLY INTENT OF CITY COUNCIL IN
18:42:43 2016 THAT THIS WOULD BE DONE AT THE REZONING.
18:42:47 HERE ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE 2016 DISCUSSION AND
18:42:47 TESTIMONY.
18:42:48 STAFF.
18:42:51 THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS NUMEROUS OBJECTIONS TO
18:42:53 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS CONDITIONS.
18:42:56 YOU HAVE ACCESS LIMITED TO ONE WAY ON AND OFF THE
18:42:57 PENINSULA.
18:42:59 YOU HAVE MANY PEOPLE LIVING ON A CORNER THAT WILL NOT
18:43:00 BE ABLE TO LEAVE.
18:43:03 THAT IS AN ISSUE OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
18:43:04 CITY COUNCIL.
18:43:09 IF THERE IS AN EXPLOSION OR EVENT, WHO WILL BE HELD
18:43:09 LIABLE?
18:43:12 IF THE CITY WAS TO MAKE A MISTAKE, WOULDN'T THAT
18:43:16 MISTAKE BE MADE AT THE PD PROCESS RATHER THAN POINT IN
18:43:17 THE PROCESS?
18:43:19 IF WE ARE GOING TO BE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING, WOULDN'T IT
18:43:23 BE THE WAY WE EVALUATE THE RISK FOR THE PD?
18:43:25 ISN'T THAT THE PLACE THAT WE WOULD DECIDE THE DETAILS
18:43:26 ABOUT THIS?
18:43:29 WHEN IT COMES TO ANY TYPE OF NEGLIGENCE, THE COUNCIL,
18:43:33 THE GOVERNMENT IS IMMUNE TO LIABILITY ON PLANNING LEVEL
18:43:34 DECISIONS.
18:43:38 IT IS DISTURBING TO ME IN LIGHT OF THE ENORMOUS
18:43:41 LIABILITY THE CITY MAY HAVE IN THE EVENT OF AN
18:43:45 EMERGENCY, AN EXPERT CITY SAFETY EVALUATION HAS NOT
18:43:46 BEEN PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
18:43:48 I ASK YOU TO DENY THIS REZONING.
18:43:49 THANK YOU.
18:43:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:43:54 THAT IS THE ONLY PERSON IN PERSON TO SPEAK, BUT WE HAVE
18:43:57 A FEW REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
18:43:59 I SHOW FIVE ON MY LIST.
18:44:02 I AM NOT SURE HOW MANY WE DO HAVE.
18:44:06 IF THE CLERK WOULD BRING THEM ON, WE WILL SWEAR THEM IN
18:44:27 AND GO FROM THERE.
18:44:30 >>CLERK: CHAIR, EVERYONE IS ON.
18:44:33 THEY JUST NEED TO TURN ON THE VIDEO.
18:44:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE TURN ON YOUR VIDEO AND SO
18:44:42 WE CAN SEE YOU AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.
18:44:47 ALL RIGHT, I SEE SHAWN BROWN AND STEPHANIE POYNOR.
18:44:49 WHO ELSE DO WE HAVE?
18:44:56 I HAVE JEAN STROHMEYER AND PRISCILLA AND LAST NAME
18:44:58 DENAULT.
18:45:04 PRISCILLA IS ON AND IS JEAN STROHMEYER HERE?
18:45:07 RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN START
18:45:11 WITH STEPHANIE POYNOR.
18:45:12 [SWEARING IN]
18:45:18 FOR THE RECORD THE CLERK DID RECEIVE WRITTEN COMMENTS
18:45:20 FOR THE ITEM.
18:45:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:45:23 BEGIN, STEPHANIE POYNOR.
18:45:24 YES, MA'AM.
18:45:25 >> GOOD EVENING.
18:45:27 I HAD SURGERY TODAY.
18:45:29 I BROKE FOUR BONES IN MY LEG.
18:45:31 SO I AM GOING TO KEEP THIS VERY SHORT.
18:45:33 THIS ISN'T ABOUT OVERBUILDING SOG.
18:45:36 IT IS ABOUT BUILDING WHERE IT IS DANGEROUS FOR FOLKS TO
18:45:37 LIVE.
18:45:40 I KNOW THAT EVERYONE IN THIS MEETING KNOWS ABOUT PINEY
18:45:42 POINT IN MANATEE.
18:45:44 TODAY IS YOUR CHANCE TO PREVENT SOMETHING SIMILAR FROM
18:45:47 EMBARRASSING THE CITY.
18:45:50 THIS PROJECT AND THE ONE THAT WAS PRESENTED AT 5101
18:45:53 WEST TYSON HAVE NEVER EVER BEEN CONSIDERED.
18:45:56 THE GREED OF THE FOLKS THAT THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA IS
18:45:58 UNCONSCIONABLE.
18:46:01 NONE OF THE DEVELOPERS WILL BE LIVING HERE.
18:46:05 TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO SAY NO TO KICKING COMMON
18:46:06 SENSE TO THE CURB.
18:46:09 TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO ASK CITY STAFF TO
18:46:15 INSTALL A BOX OR PUBLIC SAFETY BOX FOR STAFF REPORT FOR
18:46:18 THINGS LIKE DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PLANT NEXT DOOR OR
18:46:21 ACROSS THE STREET UNTIL THE CDC SAYS IT IS SAFE.
18:46:24 TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO DO WHAT -- TO DO WHAT
18:46:29 THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD HAVE DONE IN 2016, JUST SAY NO.
18:46:32 THE CITY SEEMS TO WORRY ABOUT GETTING SUED FOR NOT
18:46:36 GIVING SOME RICH GUY WHAT HE WANTS TO DO WITH HIS LAND.
18:46:40 WELL, NO ONE MADE THEM BUY THAT LAND NEXT TO CHEMICAL
18:46:42 FORMULATORS IN 2004.
18:46:45 NO ONE IS FORCING THE DEVELOPER TO BUY THIS LAND.
18:46:48 NO ONE.
18:46:52 THIS DEVELOPMENT IF IT WERE ON TRASK AND INTERBAY WOULD
18:46:55 BE A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION, BUT OUR CITY IS ALREADY
18:46:59 STRUGGLING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY DANGEROUSLY KEEPING UP
18:47:01 WITH THE POPULATION HERE NOW OR THAT IS APPROVED OR
18:47:04 COMING SOON.
18:47:08 AN EXISTING PROBLEM, AN APARTMENT COMPLEX ON A DEAD END
18:47:13 WHICH IS 499 FEET FROM A CHLORINE PLANT IS
18:47:14 IRRESPONSIBLE AND DANGEROUS.
18:47:19 CARROLL ANN BENNETT IS THERE IN PERSON AND READ THE
18:47:22 2016 REPORT FROM DAVID HEY AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
18:47:27 THAT SAID NO TO CHANGING THESE REZONINGS IN RATTLESNAKE
18:47:28 POINT.
18:47:31 IT IS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, AND MISS DOCK'S NAME
18:47:32 WAS ON THAT AS WELL.
18:47:35 IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SAID NO IN 2016, WHY WOULD
18:47:37 YOU SAY YES TODAY?
18:47:40 TAMPA CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO READ THE 2016 REPORT BEFORE
18:47:41 MAKING A DECISION.
18:47:45 AND SHOULD ALSO REVIEW THE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES.
18:47:50 PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SAVE FOLKS THAT WHO COULD
18:47:54 FALL VICTIM FROM THESE DEVELOPER HAVE NO QUALMS PUTTING
18:48:03 TENANTS NEXT TO A DANGEROUS FACILITY.
18:48:06 FOR THE BUCK THE CITY, THE BUCK STOPS HERE.
18:48:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AND WE WISH
18:48:10 YOU A SPEEDY RECOVERY.
18:48:15 NEXT UP, JEAN STROHMEYER.
18:48:16 YES, MA'AM.
18:48:23 IF YOU WILL UNMUTE YOURSELF.
18:48:24 >> OKAY.
18:48:25 CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
18:48:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD.
18:48:28 >> HELLO.
18:48:28 OKAY.
18:48:31 I AM JEAN STROHMEYER.
18:48:34 I'M HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS PROPERTY BASED ON THE
18:48:38 FACT THAT IT IS IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION.
18:48:43 AGAIN, WE HAVE SEEN THESE CHEMICAL SPILLS, YOU KNOW, IN
18:48:46 DIFFERENT PARTS OF -- IN THE PARTS OF THE COUNTRY.
18:48:50 AND IT IS JUST SIMPLY DANGEROUS.
18:48:53 THE CHEMICALS DON'T STOP AT WALLS.
18:48:58 I JUST THINK WITH ALL WE HAD ABOUT SMART PLANNING NEEDS
18:48:59 TO BE UTILIZED.
18:49:01 WE NEED OUR VOICES HEARD.
18:49:08 WE NEED THESE -- WE JUST NOT NEED TO BE HEARD, BUT WE
18:49:10 NEED ACTION AND -- I MEAN IT IS A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY
18:49:12 THAT THEY WANT TO DO.
18:49:13 I AM NOT GOING TO FAULT THEM FOR THAT.
18:49:17 IT IS REALLY PRETTY; HOWEVER, THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE
18:49:21 UNLESS THEY HAVE A VOTE -- OR THEY JUST WON'T BE ABLE
18:49:27 TO GO OUT AS CARROLL ANN SAID.
18:49:30 THEY DIDN'T WANT IT IN 2016 BECAUSE IT WAS INHERENTLY
18:49:32 DANGEROUS.
18:49:34 WE SHOULDN'T HAVE IT NOW.
18:49:35 SAVE THE PEOPLE.
18:49:38 BAD ENOUGH WITH HURRICANE BUT THE ADDED CHEMICAL THAT
18:49:42 WOULD CREATE JUST -- JUST BAD PROBLEMS AND IF IT
18:49:44 HAPPENED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT, HOW IS ANYBODY
18:49:47 GOING TO GET PEOPLE SLEEPING AND WAKE THEM UP AND GET
18:49:51 THEM OUT OF THERE BUT FOR GOING STRAIGHT THROUGH THE --
18:49:55 THE ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD CLOUD THEY WILL HAVE TO GO
18:49:58 THROUGH TO BREATHE THAT ON THEIR WAY OUT.
18:50:03 SO JUST -- I SUGGEST Y'ALL MAKE SMART DECISIONS HERE.
18:50:03 THANK YOU.
18:50:04 HAVE A GOOD DAY.
18:50:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:50:07 NEXT UP IS PRISCILLA.
18:50:10 THEN WE HAVE SHAWN BROWN.
18:50:13 AND MISS DENAULT.
18:50:15 PRISCILLA.
18:50:20 >> HI, I AM PRISCILLA PARTEL, AND I LIVE IN THE SOG
18:50:21 COMMUNITY.
18:50:26 THIS PROJECT WILL ADD 4097 TRIPS TO THE LOCAL ROADS.
18:50:30 THE THREE TYSON AVENUE APARTMENT COMPLEXES COMBINED
18:50:34 WILL ADD 8445 TRIPS TO THE LOCAL ROADS.
18:50:38 ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS OFFICIAL TRAFFIC STUDY SAYS THAT
18:50:42 A NEW LIGHT AT TYSON IN WEST SHORE WILL COST $2
18:50:43 MILLION.
18:50:47 BUT THIS PROJECT WILL PROBABLY PAY LESS THAN $200,000
18:50:49 OF THAT COST.
18:50:55 WE, THE TAXPAYERS, HAVE TO SUBSIDIZE THE REST.
18:50:57 AND HOW LONG WILL THE RESIDENTS HAVE TO SUFFER THROUGH
18:51:01 THE TRAFFIC OF ALL OF THAT CONSTRUCTION.
18:51:05 AND 9,000 MORE CARS BEFORE THE LIGHT IS EVEN BUILT.
18:51:08 WILL WE SUFFER FOR YEARS?
18:51:11 RECENTLY, THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL
18:51:15 DENIED A REQUEST FOR AN APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE BUILT
18:51:19 ON A LOCAL ROAD BECAUSE IT IS PROHIBITED IN CITY CODE.
18:51:22 THE CODE SAYS THE APARTMENT COMPLEXES MUST BE BUILT ON
18:51:28 COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL ROADS, BUT APPARENTLY THAT ONLY
18:51:31 APPLIES FOR AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE INSTEAD OF
18:51:32 REZONING.
18:51:35 IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES, BUT THE
18:51:36 REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
18:51:39 THERE IS NO COMMON SENSE IS THAT.
18:51:42 NORFOLK, VIRGINIA PARK IS OFTEN COMMENDED FOR THEIR
18:51:47 EFFORTS TO ADAPT TO RISING WATERS AND TO DEAL WITH SEA
18:51:49 LEVEL RISE AND CLIMATE CHANGE.
18:51:54 ACCORDING TO TAMPA SEA LEVEL RISE PRESENTATION,
18:51:57 NORFOLK'S POLICY IS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PLUS
18:52:00 ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS VIA HOUSING
18:52:01 BUYOUTS.
18:52:04 AND THEIR POLICY IS TO MAINTAIN BUT NOT EXPAND KEY
18:52:07 ROADS AND SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES.
18:52:10 AT THE SAME TIME, THEY ARE ENHANCING THEIR COASTAL
18:52:11 ECONOMIC ENGINES.
18:52:13 THEY ARE MAKING MAJOR INVESTMENTS IN STRUCTURAL
18:52:18 PROTECTION AND AREAS WITH KEY ECONOMIC ACCESS ESSENTIAL
18:52:21 TO THE CITY'S FUTURE.
18:52:24 ENCOURAGING DENSE MIX THE USE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
18:52:25 COASTAL AREAS.
18:52:28 THAT SEEMS TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT TAMPA IS
18:52:29 DOING.
18:52:33 TAMPA'S POLICY SEEMS TO BE TO CROSS OUR FINGERS AND
18:52:35 HOPE FOR THE BEST.
18:52:38 PLEASE DENY THIS IRRESPONSIBLE DENSITY INCREASE IN THE
18:52:41 MOST VULNERABLE AREA AND PLAN RESPONSIBLY FOR OUR
18:52:42 FUTURE.
18:52:42 THANK YOU.
18:52:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:52:50 NEXT IS UP SHAWN BROWN.
18:52:53 >> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
18:52:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD, SIR.
18:52:56 >> PERFECT.
18:53:00 BEFORE I GET STARTED CAN I REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL 30
18:53:02 SECONDS, MR. CHAIRMAN?
18:53:03 >> YES, GO AHEAD.
18:53:05 >> GOOD EVENING, SHAWN BROWN, PRESIDENT OF THE GANDY
18:53:07 CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
18:53:11 I'M IN MY TRUCK BECAUSE IT IS THURSDAY AND OUR
18:53:13 GROCERIES ARE OPEN.
18:53:16 AND ONE DAY YOU WILL COME AND SEE THE -- SERVE 170
18:53:19 FAMILIES SO FAR THIS EVENING.
18:53:22 SO AT ANY RATE, HERE THIS EVENING ON THIS REZONING.
18:53:27 I DO WANT TO THANK THE DEVELOPER, ELISE, AND OTHERS
18:53:34 REACHING OUT TO US ON MARCH 16 TO DISCUSS THE UPDATES
18:53:36 AND CONTINUE TO GET OUR FEEDBACK.
18:53:43 OBVIOUSLY WHAT YOU DID -- AND HEARD FROM A LOT OF
18:53:47 RESIDENTS FROM PINEY POINT, 300 HOMES THAT HAD TO BE
18:53:50 EVACUATED AND BUSINESSES AND ALL THAT SUCH.
18:53:55 A LOT OF RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED IS RATTLESNAKE POINT
18:53:59 THE SAME AS PINEY POINT WITH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS.
18:54:04 AND I THINK THOSE CONCERNS ARE VALID COMING UP.
18:54:06 WE DON'T KNOW THE --
18:54:06 [INAUDIBLE]
18:54:09 -- THAT IT CAUSED.
18:54:15 THAT THE -- THAT THE RESERVIST SPACE -- THE RESERVIST
18:54:19 PROPERTY ON THERE DO ACTUAL DRILLS IN THE EVENT OF
18:54:21 CHEMICAL FORMULATORS.
18:54:24 THEY HAVE ACTIVE DRILLS WHERE THEY PREPARE FOR SO.
18:54:28 THE QUESTION BEGS, IS THE DEVELOPER GOING TO HAVE TO
18:54:34 REQUIRE DRILLS FOR RESIDENTS IN THE EVENT THAT
18:54:35 SOMETHING HAPPENS?
18:54:41 YOU KNOW, ALSO IT WAS BROUGHT UP THE FLOODING AND THE
18:54:45 -- YOU KNOW, THE HURRICANE AND HOW FEMA HAS CLASSIFIED.
18:54:49 ONE OF THE THINGS I SAW IN THE REDESIGN THAT -- FROM
18:54:54 THE GROUND FIRST FLOOR IS 10 FEET, 8 INCHES.
18:55:01 GRANTED IF WE HAVE A 14, 15 FOOT COMING IN THE FIRST
18:55:03 FLOOR OF THE ACTUAL APARTMENTS WILL BE FLOODED.
18:55:06 AND I TALKED TO SOME INSURANCE AGENTS AND SOME SAID
18:55:11 THEY WOULDN'T INSURE ANYBODY -- GIVE RENTER'S INSURANCE
18:55:13 OR ANYTHING OUT THERE ON THAT -- IN THIS PROJECT.
18:55:17 SOME HAVE SAID THEY WOULD, BUT IT WOULD BE AT A VERY
18:55:20 HIGH COST, AND WE ARE TALKING OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS
18:55:21 OUT THERE.
18:55:24 NOTHING IN POLICIES THAT SAYS IF SOMETHING WERE TO
18:55:26 HAPPEN ARE RESIDENTS COVERED.
18:55:30 THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES FOR RESIDENTS AS FAR AS ARE
18:55:34 THEY GOING TO INSURE THEIR LIVES, THEIR GOODS AND
18:55:35 THINGS OF THAT NATURE AS WELL.
18:55:38 ONE OF THESE THINGS STEPHANIE MENTIONED IF THIS PROJECT
18:55:41 WAS ELSEWHERE, TRASK.
18:55:42 I LIKE THE CHANGE.
18:55:45 I LIKE THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE.
18:55:46 I REALLY DO.
18:55:53 IS IT FIT FOR RATTLESNAKE POINT, I DON'T THINK SO.
18:55:56 I DON'T THINK IT FITS RIGHT NOW.
18:55:59 I THINK TO GET THE CHEMICAL TO MOVE TO GET A
18:55:59 TRANSITION.
18:56:04 WORKED HARD TO GET THE CONAGRA FACILITY DOWNTOWN OFF OF
18:56:09 WATER STREET AND FINICK AND HIS GROUP WANT TO CONTINUE.
18:56:15 THE FLOUR MILL IS MOVING AND NEED TO WORK WITH CHEMICAL
18:56:18 FORMULATORS TO MOVE ALL THE POINT SO A TRUE TRANSITION
18:56:22 CAN OCCUR AND THE ISSUE -- THE SAFETY ISSUE.
18:56:27 I LOOK AT THREE SS: SAFE, SMART AND SUSTAINABLE.
18:56:29 THIS PROJECT CAN DO AND IN OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY.
18:56:32 RIGHT NOW AT RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:56:36 WITH PINEY POINT AND $200 MILLION PRICE TAG THAT THE
18:56:42 STATE WILL GET STUCK WITH AND WE AS TAXPAYERS, THE HSK
18:56:46 IS NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY MONEY TO PAY BACK ON THAT.
18:56:49 A LOT OF LIABILITY THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO ABSORB
18:56:52 SHOULD SOMETHING HAPPEN WITH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS.
18:56:56 IN HINDSIGHT, WE DON'T KNOW A LOT YET, BUT I THINK IT
18:57:00 IS PROBABLY BEHOOVE THE CITY AND GIVEN THE DISCUSSIONS
18:57:04 ON 2016 ON THIS, WILL BE FINE TO PUT RESOURCES TO HAVE
18:57:08 THE CHEMICAL FORMULATORS TO BE RELOCATED.
18:57:11 AT THIS POINT I ASK THAT YOU REJECT THE PROJECT.
18:57:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:57:15 >> THANK YOU.
18:57:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MRS. DENAULT, YOU ARE THE LAST
18:57:20 SPEAKER.
18:57:23 >> HI, KALI DENAULT.
18:57:26 I AM THE PORT TAMPA CIVIC PRESIDENT.
18:57:29 GIVEN THE LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE AROUND THIS AREA TO
18:57:32 SUPPORT SUCH GROWTH, OUR ASSOCIATION DOES NOT SUPPORT
18:57:32 THE PROJECT.
18:57:37 THE TRAFFIC STUDY CONDUCTED IN 2007 BY TINDEL OLIVER
18:57:39 AND ASSOCIATES IN THE NEAR --
18:57:39 [INAUDIBLE]
18:57:42 -- MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS -- MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
18:57:45 SOUTH OF AND GO TOW KEEP UP WITH THE INCREASE IN THE
18:57:47 DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND WORK.
18:57:49 NOT ONLY THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE MADE, BUT THE
18:57:50 GROWTH CONDITIONED.
18:57:54 I UNDERSTAND TRAFFIC STUDY IS CONDUCTED FOR EACH
18:57:58 PROJECT TO CONSIDER IMPACT FEES BUT NOT PAINTING A
18:57:59 CLEAR PICTURE.
18:58:04 THE 440 APARTMENT ON WEST SHORE AND INTERBAY HAS NOT
18:58:06 IMPACTED THE ROADS.
18:58:11 TRAFFIC FROM 216 UP AT TRASK AND MCCOY, 25 AT INTERBAY.
18:58:16 22 HOUSES -- 22 TOWNHOUSES AT WEST SHORE AND MCCOY AND
18:58:20 THE PROJECT APPROVED A MONTHS AGO ON WEST SHORE THAT
18:58:21 THE TRAFFIC WILL FEED INTO.
18:58:24 HOW IS THE CITY SURE THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SAFELY
18:58:28 EVACUATE OF A HURRICANE IN FIVE YEARS WHEN ALL OF THESE
18:58:29 PROJECTS ARE COMPLETE.
18:58:32 THE CITY COMPLETED BY A PROFESSIONAL SAID THAT WEST
18:58:35 SHORE BOULEVARD NEEDED TO BE FOUR LANES BEGINNING AT
18:58:36 TYSON.
18:58:40 A SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOULD BE ON MANHATTAN AVENUE TO
18:58:42 GANDY BOULEVARD.
18:58:44 THESE ARE SOME OF THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THE COMPANY
18:58:46 SAID WOULD NEED AND WAS NOT DONE.
18:58:48 THIS IS 14 YEARS AGO.
18:58:54 DALE MABRY AT 90% CAPACITY AND BAYSHORE AT 95%
18:58:55 CAPACITY.
18:58:59 AS PRISCILLA ADDED, THAT THE APARTMENT COMPLEX BIND
18:59:02 WILL ADD SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC TO THE ROAD AND
18:59:06 TRAFFIC LIGHT AT TYSON AND WEST SHORE.
18:59:10 HOW LONG THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 2007 STUDY NO
18:59:12 IDEA WHEN THAT WILL BE INSTALLED.
18:59:14 I APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT REDUCING THE NUMBER OF
18:59:17 APARTMENTS AND ADDING RETAIL, WHICH IS HIGHLY DESIRED,
18:59:20 BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW OUR ROAD CAN WITHSTAND THIS TYPE
18:59:22 OF GROWTH.
18:59:22 THANK YOU.
18:59:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:59:27 THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGISTERED SPEAKERS AND PUBLIC
18:59:28 COMMENT IN PERSON.
18:59:33 QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS BEFORE WE GO
18:59:35 TO -- COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
18:59:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER.
18:59:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HEARING NONE.
18:59:40 DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING, SIR?
18:59:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:59:45 I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS TO MRS. IRA.
18:59:47 I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS DR. IRA.
18:59:49 BUT MISS IRA.
18:59:54 SO TO START WITH, YOU INDICATED THAT IN YOUR RESEARCH
18:59:58 YOU COULDN'T FIND ANY EPA CITATIONS.
19:00:04 AND HOW FAR BACK DID YOU GO ON THAT?
19:00:07 >> THE REPORT WENT BACK TO 1997, I BELIEVE.
19:00:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
19:00:15 THE -- ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE 1998 SPILL THAT AT
19:00:19 THAT PLANT THAT INVOLVED 68 PEOPLE BEING SICK?
19:00:20 >> YEAH, I AM.
19:00:24 AND THEY DIDN'T RECEIVE A CITATION FROM THAT ACCORDING
19:00:27 TO THE INFORMATION THAT I SAW.
19:00:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU DON'T THAT I WAS IMPORTANT TELL
19:00:34 US AS RELATED TO YOUR INFORMATION?
19:00:38 >> WELL, I ONLY HAD A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.
19:00:42 AND I WAS FOCUSING MY -- YOU KNOW MY OUTLINE ON THE
19:00:43 SAFEGUARDS THEY INSTALLED.
19:00:50 AND I -- BUT I WILL ADDRESS THAT RELEASE THAT OCCURRED.
19:00:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW ABOUT THE --
19:00:53 >> THEY HAD ANOTHER ONE --
19:00:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORRY.
19:00:59 HOW ABOUT THE 2005 INCIDENT THAT RESULTED IN AN EPC
19:01:00 INVESTIGATION.
19:01:02 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY EPC INVESTIGATION.
19:01:05 AND ALSO -- SEVERAL PEOPLE GETTING SICK.
19:01:09 >> THAT WAS -- THE INCIDENT ACTUALLY OCCURRED IN 2003.
19:01:12 MAYBE THE INVESTIGATION HAPPENED IN 2005, BUT THE
19:01:14 INCIDENT OCCURRED IN 2003.
19:01:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU DIDN'T FEEL THAT WAS IMPORTANT
19:01:21 TO TELL US ABOUT?
19:01:24 >> LIKE I SAID, I WAS FOCUSING MY TALK ON THE
19:01:27 SAFEGUARDS THEY INSTALLED BECAUSE WANTED TO CONVEY THE
19:01:30 INFORMATION WE FOUND ON THE PLANT ON THE SAFEGUARDS
19:01:31 THEY INSTALLED.
19:01:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I ONLY HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF
19:01:38 TIME AND LET YOU EXPLAIN FURTHER WHEN MISS BATSEL COMES
19:01:40 BACK ON HER REBUTTAL.
19:01:41 HOW ABOUT HOMELAND SECURITY.
19:01:46 IS THIS PLANT SUBJECT TO HOMELAND SECURITY AFTER NOT --
19:01:52 AFTER 9/11 AND WHY.
19:01:56 >> THE PLANT IS SUBJECT TO THE CFAS RULE.
19:02:02 THE CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STATUTE.
19:02:07 I DIDN'T REALLY LOOK INTO THAT BECAUSE TO NONE OF THAT
19:02:09 INFORMATION IS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AND YOU HAVE TO TALK
19:02:12 TO THE FACILITY TO FIND OUT.
19:02:15 BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CHLORINE CONTAINERS AND 150-POUND
19:02:19 CONTAINER THEY WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A CFAS RULE AND HAVE
19:02:23 TO SUBMIT A SECURITY REPORT TO THE DHS, BUT, AGAIN,
19:02:25 THAT INFORMATION IS NOT PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.
19:02:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE
19:02:34 GRANITEVILLE, GEORGIA DISASTER THAT INVOLVED THREE
19:02:37 RAILROAD CARS THAT COME OFF THE TRACK?
19:02:39 >> YEAH, IT DIDN'T COME OFF THE TRACK AND A SWITCHING
19:02:43 ERROR BY THE RAILROAD AND CAUSED THE TWO TRAINS TO
19:02:44 WRECK.
19:02:45 AND ONE --
19:02:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DO YOU REMEMBER HOW MANY PEOPLE
19:02:51 DIED IN THAT INCIDENT?
19:02:52 >> I THINK THERE WERE 12.
19:02:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I ONLY HAVE GOT NINE FROM THE --
19:02:58 >> MAYBE YOU ARE RIGHT.
19:03:00 MAYBE IT IS NINE.
19:03:01 I DON'T HAVE THOSE NUMBERS.
19:03:03 I REMEMBER THREE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE OTHERS
19:03:07 WERE AT THE MILL THAT WAS RIGHT NEXT TO THAT RAILROAD
19:03:08 SITE.
19:03:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE HOSPITALIZED,
19:03:11 CORRECT?
19:03:12 >> RIGHT, RIGHT.
19:03:14 THAT WOULD BE CAR TRANSPORTATION INCIDENT WHEN YOU
19:03:15 THINK ABOUT IT.
19:03:19 THAT TYPE OF ACCIDENT COULD HAPPEN ANYWHERE BECAUSE
19:03:23 THOSE RAILCARS TRAVEL ACROSS STATE LINE, CITY LINE,
19:03:23 ETC.
19:03:28 AND IT IS THE WORST INCIDENT THAT I AM AWARE OF
19:03:33 REGARDING A RAILCAR RELEASE.
19:03:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE THE RAILCARS FILLED WITH
19:03:39 CHLORINE THAT GET MOVED AROUND THIS PLANT AND THIS
19:03:40 FACILITY?
19:03:46 >> THERE ARE RAILCARS SITED AT THERE AND THEY PARK
19:03:50 THERE AND THEY UNLOAD CHLORINE.
19:03:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU PREDICT -- IF THERE IS AN
19:03:57 INCIDENT, CAN YOU PREDICT WHAT DIRECTION THE CHLORINE
19:04:00 PLUME WOULD NECESSARILY FLOW?
19:04:04 >> WOULD DEPEND ON THE WIND DIRECTION AT THE TIME OF
19:04:07 THE RELEASE AND OTHER ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS.
19:04:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: POSSIBLE IT COULD GO TO THE WEST TO
19:04:12 THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, CORRECT?
19:04:14 >> IF THE WIND WERE BLOWING THAT WAY.
19:04:18 BUT LIKE I STATED, THEY DO HAVE A DELUGE SYSTEM OVER
19:04:22 THE RAILCAR AND EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VALVE.
19:04:26 AND THE EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VALVE WOULD NOT WORK IN A
19:04:29 TRAIN WRECK, BUT DURING NORMAL OPERATION, THE EMERGENCY
19:04:34 SHUTOFF VALVE WOULD TYPICALLY ENGAGE AND STOP THE FLOW
19:04:37 OF CHLORINE SO THE ONLY AMOUNT RELEASED IS THE AMOUNT
19:04:40 IN THE TRANSFER HOSE AT THE TIME.
19:04:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
19:04:44 IN GRANITEVILLE, THE RELEASE WAS 46 TONS, DOES THAT
19:04:45 RING A BELL?
19:04:48 >> YEAH, IT WAS A 90-TON RAILCAR.
19:04:52 SO IN A TRAIN WRECK, IT DID NOT RELEASE THE ENTIRE MAP,
19:04:53 THE 46 TONS.
19:04:55 ACTUALLY ABOUT -- ABOUT THAT AMOUNT.
19:04:56 YOU SAW A DIFFERENT NUMBER.
19:05:01 BUT THAT'S WHAT I SAW.
19:05:03 SO I WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT --
19:05:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME FINISH UP MY QUESTIONS, AND
19:05:12 THEN MISS BATSEL CAN DECIDE HOW MUCH TIME SHE WANTS TO
19:05:15 DEVOTE TO YOU AND I AM SURE MR. CHAIRMAN WILL GIVE YOU
19:05:16 ALL THE TIME YOU NEED.
19:05:20 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FROM TRANSPORTATION -- OUR
19:05:25 TRANSPORTATION STAFF ON?
19:05:26 MISS DOCK?
19:05:28 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, JONATHAN
19:05:30 SCOTT IS ON THE LINE.
19:05:34 >> JONATHAN SCOTT, CITY OF TAMPA TRANSPORTATION
19:05:35 PLANNING.
19:05:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JONATHAN, GOOD EVENING.
19:05:39 REFRESH MY MEMORY.
19:05:43 I AM SURE IT CAME UP LAST TIME AND IN TERM OF WAS THERE
19:05:45 A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE EITHER BY THE CITY OR THE
19:05:48 DEVELOPER ON THIS PROJECT?
19:05:52 >> YES, SIR, THE DEVELOPER DID DO A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR
19:05:54 THIS PROJECT.
19:05:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW MANY TRIPS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT
19:06:03 FOR -- FOR THESE 495 NEW UNITS?
19:06:08 >> FOR THE PROJECT -- LET'S SEE, LIKE A NET DAILY TRIPS
19:06:12 OF UNDER -- LET'S SEE, AROUND 4,000 DAILY TRIPS.
19:06:16 I KNOW THEY JUST UPDATED THAT SINCE THE -- SINCE THEY
19:06:18 REDUCED THE UNITS.
19:06:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM TRYING TO -- I AM TRYING TO GO
19:06:24 FAST BECAUSE PEOPLE -- PEOPLE WANT ME TO GO FAST.
19:06:29 ARE THERE -- ARE THERE ANY FAILING ROADS THAT THESE
19:06:33 4,000 TRIPS DUMP ON TO, FAILING ROADS AND OR
19:06:34 INTERSECTIONS.
19:06:37 AND I SAY "FAILING" I MEAN IN TERMS OF THEIR CURRENT
19:06:42 LEVEL OF SERVICE BEING, YOU KNOW, ARE THERE ANY LEVEL D
19:06:44 OR LEVEL F?
19:06:49 I THINK IF MY CHILDREN CAME HOME WITH DS OR FS I WOULD
19:06:50 CALL IT FAILING.
19:06:56 >> YES, FAILING MOVEMENT FROM THE PROJECT THAT THAT HAD
19:06:59 PROJECT TRAFFIC IN WEST SHORE AND GANDY AND ALSO GANDY
19:07:07 AND MANHATTAN AND CROP SHARE MITIGATION FOR THAT -- THE
19:07:07 MOVEMENTS.
19:07:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: POURING 4,000 ADDITIONAL PROJECT ON
19:07:13 TO FAILING ROADS AND FAILING INTERSECTIONS, IS THAT
19:07:14 CORRECT?
19:07:18 >> WELL, THOSE ARE DAILY TRIPS TOTAL, BUT ACTUAL TRIPS
19:07:23 TO THOSE SPECIFIC FAILING MOVEMENTS IS NOT NECESSARILY
19:07:27 4,000 BUT BROKEN UP IN THE DISTRIBUTION.
19:07:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:07:30 THANK YOU, JONATHAN.
19:07:32 THANK YOU, MISS IRA.
19:07:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
19:07:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IS DAVID HEY THERE?
19:07:43 >>DAVID HEY: YES, COUNCILMEMBER.
19:07:45 I'M HERE.
19:07:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: KNOW I THINK THE -- THE APPLICANT HAS
19:07:53 TRIED DO A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS TO GET THIS PROJECT
19:07:56 MOVING, AND I AM APPRECIATIVE OF THAT, BUT AFTER
19:08:00 GETTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND THEN I AM LOOKING AT
19:08:01 THE TRANSCRIPTS.
19:08:05 IT SEEMS LIKE THIS ISSUE CAME UP BEFORE, DID IT NOT?
19:08:09 >>DAVID HEY: WELL, I THINK THE RESIDENTS IN SOG DID
19:08:17 BRING UP THE 2016 TEXT AMENDMENT THAT THE
19:08:20 RECOMMENDATION, I BELIEVE -- AND I DON'T HAVE THAT IN
19:08:24 FRONT OF ME BUT I BELIEVE THAT IS CORRECT.
19:08:27 THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF AT THE TIME WAS THE TEXT
19:08:29 AMENDMENT WAS INCONSISTENT.
19:08:32 AND I BELIEVE THE CITY STAFF WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH
19:08:32 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:08:36 REMEMBER, WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE FINAL
19:08:42 DETERMINATION WAS BY TAMPA CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME
19:08:44 THAT IF IT WAS CONSISTENT.
19:08:47 SO THE LANGUAGE WAS CHANGED.
19:08:51 AND WE ARE NOW -- WE ARE NOW REVIEWING THESE REZONING
19:08:57 REQUESTS ON THAT LANGUAGE THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED.
19:08:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO WE ARE SAYING THE LANGUAGE BEFORE
19:09:04 WHEN THIS CAME UP WAS INCONSISTENT, CORRECT?
19:09:09 >>DAVID HEY: WELL, THE -- THERE WAS ALREADY LANGUAGE
19:09:12 WITHIN THE COMP PLAN PRIOR TO 2016 REGARDING
19:09:14 RATTLESNAKE POINT.
19:09:19 A PRIVATE TEXT AMENDMENT CAME IN, LIKE ANY OTHER
19:09:22 APPLICANT CAN, AND SOUGHT A CHANGE TO THE TEXT
19:09:25 REGARDING RATTLESNAKE POINT.
19:09:29 THE STAFF REVIEWED THAT BASED ON THE POLICY DIRECTION
19:09:33 AT THE TIME IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND RECOMMENDED
19:09:38 THAT THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE BY THE APPLICANT WAS
19:09:39 INCONSISTENT.
19:09:44 BUT CITY COUNCIL IS THE FINAL DETERMINER, AND IT WAS
19:09:47 FOUND CONSISTENT AND THE CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE
19:09:47 LANGUAGE.
19:09:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHICH IS -- MISS WELLS, I SEE YOUR
19:09:50 HAND UP.
19:09:52 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:09:55 I WANT TO REMIND CITY COUNCIL THAT TODAY YOU APPLY THE
19:09:59 LANGUAGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IS EXISTS TODAY
19:10:02 NOT AS IT EXISTED IN 2016.
19:10:05 AND REGARDLESS OF STAFF'S POSITION ON THE 2016
19:10:10 AMENDMENTS, THAT WAS FIVE YEARS AGO.
19:10:13 TODAY, YOU HAVE GOT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND YOU ARE
19:10:15 OBLIGATED TO ABIDE BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE
19:10:17 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:10:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, DID --
19:10:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I AM GOOD, MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:10:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MISS WELLS FOR THAT.
19:10:27 IS -- MISS IRA?
19:10:28 >> YES.
19:10:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE THE EXPERT FOR THE APPLICANT,
19:10:31 CORRECT?
19:10:36 >> YES.
19:10:41 GUDES AGAIN, MISS WELLS, YOU MAY CHIME IN WHEN I AM
19:10:41 ASKING.
19:10:44 IN YOUR EXPERT OPINION, DO YOU FEEL THAT PUTTING THIS
19:10:49 PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION IS SAFE FOR RESIDENTS?
19:10:52 >> WELL, IT IS NOT REALLY MY ROLE TO TELL YOU WHETHER
19:10:54 YOU SHOULD PUT THE PROJECT IN OR NOT.
19:10:58 IF WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ASK ME IF CHLORINE IS SAFE.
19:11:02 CHLORINE HAS HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES AND IT DOES CARRY
19:11:07 RISKS, BUT SO DO MANY OTHER THINGS THAT WE ARE USED TO
19:11:09 USING AND DOING IN OUR DAILY LIVES IN OUR COMMUNITY.
19:11:12 WE HAVE ELECTRICITY IN OUR HOUSES.
19:11:13 WE DRIVE CARS.
19:11:16 WE FLY AIRPLANES.
19:11:19 THE REASON WE ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THOSE THINGS BECAUSE
19:11:21 THEY HAVE INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND SAFETY DEVICES
19:11:24 IMPLEMENTED AND PROCEDURES SUCH AS MAINTENANCE ON
19:11:27 AIRPLANES AND TRAINING FOR THE FLIGHT CREW AND RIGOROUS
19:11:31 ADHERENCE TO REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AND THOSE KIND OF
19:11:35 THINGS ARE THE SAME COMPONENT TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT
19:11:37 SYSTEMS THAT I DESCRIBED EARLIER FOR CHEMICAL
19:11:38 FORMULATORS.
19:11:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:11:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO AND COUNCILMAN
19:11:43 VIERA.
19:11:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
19:11:51 MR. HEY, ARE YOU STILL THERE?
19:11:53 THANK YOU, MR. HEY.
19:11:58 AND I AM JUST QUOTING SOME OF THE THINGS ARE IN THE
19:12:03 LAND USE OBJECTIVES FOR RATTLESNAKE POINT AND LAND USE
19:12:04 8.11.
19:12:08 AND I WILL JUST BRIEFLY RUN THROUGH IT REAL QUICK.
19:12:11 THE TRANSITION OF RATTLESNAKE AREA FROM ITS CURRENT
19:12:16 MIXED USE HEAVY AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES OF MIXED USE
19:12:21 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL USES IN A WATERFRONT
19:12:26 COMMUNITY IN A MANNER -- IN A MANNER THAT PROTECTS THE
19:12:30 PUBLIC, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
19:12:35 BUT YET THIS IS STILL NEXT TO A CHLORINE GAS
19:12:37 MANUFACTURING PLANT.
19:12:42 I AM JUST -- I AM JUST USING THIS LAND USE POLICY THAT
19:12:45 MIGHT IN THE FUTURE MAKE A POINT FOR ME.
19:12:49 LET'S LOOK AT 8.11.5.
19:12:54 AND I WILL GET DOWN TO WHERE I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT.
19:12:59 REZONING ABUTTING AN EXISTING HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES
19:13:06 THAT ARE HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
19:13:12 THAT IS TWO LAND USE POLICIES THAT SHOULD -- THAT YOU
19:13:17 ARE SAYING ARE SHOWING CONSISTENCY, BUT IT SAYS --
19:13:20 CATE, GIVE ME ONE SECOND.
19:13:25 IT SAYS TO ME THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE SAFE FROM
19:13:33 ANY ACCIDENT THAT MAY OCCUR AT THIS CHLORINE GAS
19:13:34 MANUFACTURING PLANT.
19:13:38 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
19:13:40 PLEASE, MISS WELLS.
19:13:44 >>CATE WELLS: JUST FOR THE RECORD, CHIEF ASSISTANT
19:13:44 CITY ATTORNEY.
19:13:49 WITH RESPECT TO 11.5 AND THE LANGUAGE THAT COUNCILMAN
19:13:54 CITRO JUST MENTIONED PROPOSED PD REZONING ABUT HEAVY
19:13:57 INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH
19:14:02 AND SAFETY DEMONSTRATIONS OF ACCEPTED PRACTICES THAT
19:14:05 SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY AT RISK OF SUCH HAZARDS.
19:14:08 THAT LANGUAGE -- THAT SPECIFIC PROVISION DOES NOT APPLY
19:14:12 TO THIS REZONING APPLICATION AS THIS PARCEL OF PROPERTY
19:14:18 DOES NOT ABUT THE PARCEL OF PROPERTY OF WHICH CHEMICAL
19:14:20 FORMULATORS ARE LOCATED.
19:14:22 I WANTED TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD.
19:14:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MISS WELLS.
19:14:28 MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY -- ABUTTING MAY BE A PROPERTY
19:14:31 NEXT TO ONE ANOTHER, BUT I AM LOOKING AT THIS AS A
19:14:34 PROPERTY THAT IS ABUTTING ONLY SEPARATED BY A ROAD.
19:14:36 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:14:37 THANK YOU, MISS WELLS.
19:14:39 THANK YOU, MR. HEY.
19:14:43 >>CATE WELLS: I AM ASKING COUNCIL TO APPLY THE
19:14:47 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS THAT ARE TODAY AND ABUT
19:14:49 MEANS THE PROPERTY HAS TO TOUCH.
19:14:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA.
19:14:54 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:14:57 MOST OF MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED.
19:15:00 IF YOU WILL FOR THE PUBLIC TO REVIEW OUR UNDERSTANDING
19:15:01 OF THIS.
19:15:05 IN 2016, THE PLAN WAS CHANGED TO ALLOW -- I AM SPEAKING
19:15:07 TOO CLOSELY INTO THIS.
19:15:11 TO POTENTIALLY ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT AT RATTLESNAKE
19:15:12 POINT.
19:15:17 AND THAT IS THE -- THE STAFF REPORTS ON THE PROPOSED
19:15:20 CHANGES BACK IN 2016 LOOKED AT THEM WITH THIS FAVOR,
19:15:24 BUT ULTIMATELY COUNCIL VOTED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
19:15:28 AND THAT VOTE OF COUNCIL REFLECTS THE PLAN WE RELY UPON
19:15:31 TODAY, CORRECT?
19:15:38 JUST SAY YES.
19:15:42 IS THAT IS A CORRECT STATEMENT, RIGHT?
19:15:45 >>DAVID HEY: YES, THAT IS A CORRECT STATEMENT.
19:15:47 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. HEY.
19:15:49 THAT WAS ANSWERED BEFORE, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING I
19:15:52 WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR FOR MY OWN SELF, ETC.
19:15:55 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
19:15:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:15:59 ANYBODY ELSE?
19:16:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. SHELBY ASKED ME TO CLARIFY
19:16:03 SOMETHING FOR THE RECORD.
19:16:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
19:16:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OBVIOUSLY AT THE PRIOR HEARING,
19:16:11 THIS COUNCIL AND THIS COUNCILMAN HAD A LOT OF CONCERNS
19:16:15 ABOUT THE CHLORINE ISSUE.
19:16:21 AND THAT WAS SPOKEN TO AT LENGTH.
19:16:27 THE -- AT TODAY'S HEARING, POLICE BATSEL AND HER TEAM
19:16:33 INCLUDING MISS IRA BROUGHT UP THE CHLORINE ISSUE, AND I
19:16:33 APPRECIATE THAT.
19:16:37 IN THE INTERIM BETWEEN LAST HEARING AND THIS HEARING, I
19:16:40 DID WHAT A LOT OF US DO, WHICH IS GOOGLED CHLORINE
19:16:42 SAFETY.
19:16:46 AND SPECIFICALLY AS RELATED TO THIS PLANT.
19:16:49 SO I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE THAT AND ADMIT THAT ON THE
19:16:49 RECORD.
19:16:56 THAT IS WHERE I CAME UP WITH THE 1998 SPILL AND 2005
19:17:01 SPILL AS WELL AS THAT MAJOR EVENT IN GRANITEVILLE,
19:17:05 GEORGIA WHICH MISS IRA.
19:17:07 I DON'T BELIEVE I TESTIFIED ABOUT THEM, BUT I USED IT
19:17:11 AS THE BASIS OF MY OWN INQUIRY.
19:17:15 IF MISS WELLS WANTS TO TELL ME NOT TO GOOGLE THINGS
19:17:18 LIKE THAT IN BETWEEN HEARINGS THAN I STAND AT FAULT.
19:17:21 BUT I -- I BELIEVE IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE ALL, YOU
19:17:24 KNOW, USE THE SKILLS THAT WE HAVE AND THE COMMON SENSE
19:17:25 THAT WE HAVE.
19:17:28 AND I MADE VERY CLEAR NOT TO TRY TO TESTIFY AS TO THOSE
19:17:29 ISSUES.
19:17:35 BUT TO ELICIT TESTIMONY FROM MISS IRA, WHO IS THE
19:17:35 EXPERT.
19:17:39 AND I APPRECIATE HER CANDOR AFTER I ASKED THOSE
19:17:40 QUESTIONS.
19:17:44 I WANTED TO BE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR ON THOSE MATTERS, MR.
19:17:47 CHAIR, MR. SHELBY, AND MISS WELLS.
19:17:48 SO THANK YOU.
19:17:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
19:17:53 >>BILL CARLSON: YEAH, I WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO MY
19:17:59 COLLEAGUES AND THE APPLICANT AND THE COMMUNITY ON THIS.
19:18:02 DURING THE LAST FEW MINUTES, I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING
19:18:06 AND MARTY HAS BEEN IF I HAVE A CONFLICT.
19:18:10 BASED ON MARTY'S ADVICE, I AM RECUSING MYSELF.
19:18:12 I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING WHETHER
19:18:16 OR NOT IT IS OR NOT AND IF SECOND READ GOING IT IS, I
19:18:17 WILL RECUSE MYSELF AGAIN.
19:18:21 I APOLOGIZE.
19:18:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: CONGRESSMAN CARLSON, IF I CAN JUST BE
19:18:35 CLEAR FROM WHAT YOU SAID, THEN BASED ON WHAT YOU
19:18:38 BELIEVE TO BE THE ISSUE YOU WISH TO ABSTAIN BECAUSE OF
19:18:42 THE APPEARANCE OF A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
19:18:43 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:18:49 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:18:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE.
19:18:55 REBUTTAL FOR MISS BATSEL.
19:18:58 >> BEFORE WE CONTINUE THE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT -- AM
19:19:02 I ENTITLED TO THE INFORMATION ON THE RECORD.
19:19:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HE STEPPED OUT --
19:19:07 >> I WOULD LIKE TO GO BACK TO THAT IF YOU DON'T MIND.
19:19:11 JUST QUICKLY IN REBUTTAL BEFORE WE GET TO MISS IRA AND
19:19:14 SOME OF THE ISSUES WITH RESPECT TO THE CHEMICAL PLANT,
19:19:18 JUST AS A REMINDER, THIS AREA IS PART OF THE
19:19:21 TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY.
19:19:24 OUR EXPERT STEVE HENRY IS ON LINE AND CAN REITERATE
19:19:29 WHAT HE SAID AT THE LAST HEARING, BUT YOU HAVE CHOSEN
19:19:32 TO HAVE THIS -- YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO BE A CONCURRENCY
19:19:36 EXCEPTION AREA AND I WILL LET STEVE TALK MORE ABOUT
19:19:37 THAT.
19:19:41 I WILL PUT -- TO ADDRESS THE TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
19:19:44 OF WHAT IS PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND THE NEW DEVELOPMENT.
19:19:48 STEVE, IF YOU COULD START AND START MY WEB CAM SHARING
19:19:55 HERE.
19:19:56 ARE YOU THERE?
19:19:57 >> YES, I'M HERE.
19:19:58 AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:20:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN, SIR?
19:20:04 >> YES, AT THE BEGINNING --
19:20:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET'S SWEAR YOU IN JUST IN CASE.
19:20:08 >> ABSOLUTELY.
19:20:12 >>CLERK: ALSO NICOLE.
19:20:17 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH,
19:20:20 THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
19:20:21 >> I DO.
19:20:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
19:20:25 >> THIS GRAPHIC IS A COMPARISON OF THE TRIP GENERATION
19:20:27 WHAT COULD BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY BASED ON THE
19:20:31 EXISTING ZONING THAT IS THERE TODAY WHICH IS 800 AND
19:20:33 SOME THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE THAT COULD BE
19:20:36 DEVELOPED, WHICH IS IN THE GREEN, VERSUS THE BLUE, AND
19:20:41 THE BLUE IS ACTUALLY THE NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE
19:20:44 APARTMENTS AND WITH THE TWO RESTAURANTS.
19:20:47 AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE A.M. PEAK HOUR, THE TRIP
19:20:52 GENERATION WOULD BE 937 BASED ON EXISTING VERSUS 304
19:20:54 WITH THE PROPOSED.
19:20:59 AND THEN IN THE P.M. PEAK HOUR 929 VERSUS 343.
19:21:03 SO SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN WHAT COULD BE DEVELOPED ON
19:21:08 THE PROPERTY BASED ON EXISTING ZONING VERSUS WHAT WE
19:21:09 ARE REQUESTING FOR YOU TONIGHT.
19:21:14 AND IN ADDITION, AS INDICATED BY MISS BATSEL, THIS AREA
19:21:18 IS A CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA.
19:21:21 OUR ANALYSIS WAS DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH YOUR
19:21:24 TRANSPORTATION AND MITIGATION PROCEDURES MANUAL THAT WE
19:21:26 DID AN ANALYSIS.
19:21:30 WE DID A METHODOLOGY THAT INCLUDED REVIEW BY YOUR STAFF
19:21:33 AND APPROVAL BY THAT WHEN WE DID THE ANALYSIS AND DOING
19:21:37 THE ANALYSIS TO LOOK AT WHAT MITIGATION IS REQUIRED
19:21:40 BASED ON YOUR PROCEDURES.
19:21:43 AND THIS WAS DONE AND APPROVED BY YOUR CITY STAFF.
19:21:46 I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE ON
19:21:47 TRANSPORTATION.
19:21:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
19:21:54 ALL RIGHT, WHO IS NEXT.
19:21:55 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
19:21:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORRY YOU COULDN'T SEE ME.
19:21:58 MY HAND WAS UP.
19:22:00 MR. HENRY.
19:22:00 >> YES, SIR.
19:22:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROFESSIONALISM
19:22:03 AS ALWAYS.
19:22:13 THE -- YOU KNOW THESE ROADS AS WELL AS ANYBODY THE ONES
19:22:16 THAT JONATHAN SCOTT TESTIFIED TO EARLIER WERE FAILING
19:22:22 OR THE INTERSECTIONS THAT WERE FAILING INCLUDE TWO THAT
19:22:26 WERE VIRTUALLY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS PROJECT,
19:22:29 WEST SHORE AND TYSON AND WEST SHORE AND GANDY.
19:22:32 AND THOSE ARE -- THOSE HAVE A LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT IS
19:22:32 FAILING.
19:22:39 DO YOU KNOW IN TERMS OF THE WEST SHORE AND TYSON -- YOU
19:22:43 KNOW WHAT THE PLANS ARE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THESE,
19:22:47 YOU KNOW, WHEN -- WHEN ARE THEY BREAKING GROUND, WHEN
19:22:52 IS THE CITY BREAKING GROUND AND BUDGETING FOR THIS?
19:22:55 >> WELL, FOR THE -- FOR THE TYSON AND WEST SHORE
19:22:59 INTERSECTION, BASED ON THE COUNTS THAT WE HAVE DONE,
19:23:03 TODAY IT DOES NOT MEET SIGNAL.
19:23:06 THERE ARE A NUMBER PROJECTS ALONG TYSON THAT HAVE THE
19:23:11 CONDITION TO PAY THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE SUCH TIME AS
19:23:14 THAT INTERSECTION NEEDS SIGNALS.
19:23:19 AND AS THE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS ALONG THERE, ONCE THAT
19:23:23 NEED WARRANTS, THEN THE MONIES WILL BE REQUIRED FROM
19:23:26 THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAVE THE CONDITION INCLUDING THIS
19:23:29 ONE THAT WAS WILLING TO PAY IT UP FRONT TO GO AHEAD AND
19:23:31 PUT THAT SIGNAL IN.
19:23:34 BUT THAT IS BASICALLY -- YOU HAVE TO MEET SIGNAL
19:23:38 WARRANTS, AND TODAY BASED ON EXISTING VOLUME, IT DOES
19:23:40 NOT MEET THE WARRANTS.
19:23:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO IS THAT SECTION ALREADY FAILING?
19:23:47 I THOUGHT JONATHAN SAID IT WAS ALREADY FAILING.
19:23:51 >> WELL, THE DIFFERENCE -- AGAIN, YOU HAVE ADOPTED A
19:23:53 CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION.
19:23:56 SO WE ARE -- WE DON'T LOOK AT -- WE LOOKED AT THE
19:23:59 INTERSECTIONS THEMSELVES.
19:24:06 WE LOOK AT WHAT MOVEMENT MAY BE FAILING AND MITIGATE
19:24:09 FOR THAT MOVEMENT AND YOUR PROCEDURES HOW YOU ADOPTED
19:24:12 THE CODE AND HOW WE IMPLEMENTED IT.
19:24:15 WE ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE CODE REQUIRES US TO LOOK
19:24:19 AT AND HOW TO MITIGATE OUR IMPACTS INCLUDING PAYING OUR
19:24:23 MOBILITY FEES IN ADDITION TO THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE
19:24:25 THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR MITIGATION.
19:24:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
19:24:27 >> THANK YOU.
19:24:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:24:30 WHO IS THE NEXT.
19:24:34 >> AND STEVE, I AM SORRY, I JUST HAVE A FEW MORE
19:24:39 COMMENTS BEFORE WE GO TO MARTHA IRA IF YOU DON'T MIND,
19:24:39 MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:24:45 STEVE, I JUST PUT ON THE BOARD THE CITY'S MEMORANDUM OF
19:24:49 THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS GOING IN AT GANDY.
19:24:51 WILL YOU TELL US THE HIGHLIGHTED AREA THE IMPROVEMENTS
19:24:55 AND TIMES AND WHEN THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO OPEN UP.
19:24:57 THEY ARE NEARING COMPLETION.
19:24:59 THERE ARE REALLY TWO PROJECTS GOING ON THERE.
19:25:04 ONE IS THE ELEVATED LANES OVER CANDY THAT OVER GANDY
19:25:07 THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
19:25:11 AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE CITY HAD A PROJECT TO ADD
19:25:14 GEOMETRY TO GANDY AND WEST SHORE.
19:25:17 BUT WHAT THEY DID WAS JOIN THE TWO PROJECTS TOGETHER SO
19:25:19 ALL THE CONSTRUCTION WAS DONE AT ONE TIME.
19:25:22 THIS IS A DOCUMENT THAT WAS ACTUALLY PUT OUT BY THE
19:25:26 CITY THAT SAYS ONCE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED
19:25:30 WHICH THEY ARE NEARING COMPLETION NOW A 40% REDUCTION
19:25:35 AND DELAY AT THAT INTERSECTION.
19:25:36 >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
19:25:39 AND STEVE, I UNDERSTAND IT CORRECTLY, YOUR PROFESSIONAL
19:25:41 OPINION THAT WE ARE MEETING EVERY REQUIREMENT OF THE
19:25:43 CODE OF THIS PROJECT?
19:25:45 >> YES, CORRECT.
19:25:46 YES.
19:25:49 >> SO TO ADDRESS WHAT MR. DINGFELDER IS SAYING THE CITY
19:25:53 COUNCIL WOULD HAVE TO ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THAT CODE?
19:25:54 >> CORRECT, YES.
19:25:56 >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
19:26:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MISS BATSEL, JUST TO LET YOU KNOW,
19:26:02 COUNCILMAN CARLSON IS BACK IN THE ROOM.
19:26:04 >> I MAY NEED A LITTLE EXTRA TIME, MR. CHAIRMAN,
19:26:08 OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF QUESTIONS AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW
19:26:11 WHERE THE TIME WENT BECAUSE I AM ANSWERING QUESTIONS.
19:26:16 >> SHE STILL HAS THREE MINUTES REMAINING FOR REBUTTAL.
19:26:21 >> MISS BATSEL, I STILL PLAN TO ABSTAIN.
19:26:24 AND AS I UNDERSTAND THE RULES, IF I HAVE ANY IDEA THAT
19:26:28 I MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL, I HAVE TO
19:26:28 ABSTAIN.
19:26:31 SO REGRETFULLY THAT'S IT.
19:26:32 I AM STILL RESEARCHING THIS.
19:26:35 SO IF IT GETS A SECOND HEARING, I WILL HAVE MORE
19:26:38 INFORMATION TO BE ABLE TO PASS ON.
19:26:39 >> OKAY.
19:26:40 THANK YOU.
19:26:44 SO I WANT TO QUICKLY REVISIT SOMETHING WE TALKED ABOUT
19:26:51 IN THE FIRST HEARING WITH RESPECT TO INDUSTRIAL USES
19:26:54 BEING ADJACENT TO -- TO RESIDENTIAL.
19:26:57 SO, AGAIN, WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LITTLE BIT AT THE
19:27:02 FIRST HEARING, BUT THIS IS CHANNELSIDE AND PALMETTO,
19:27:07 AND IF YOU ZOOM IN, TAMPA, IN GENERAL, HAS REDEVELOPED
19:27:17 INDUSTRIAL AREAS TO RESIDENTIAL THROUGH ITS HISTORY.
19:27:18 SORRY.
19:27:19 IT TAKES THIS A SECOND.
19:27:28 IF YOU LOOK AT PORT TAMPA AREA, THESE ARE RESIDENTIAL
19:27:34 ELEMENTS NEXT TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 500 FEET, 600 FEET.
19:27:43 THE ONE I SHOWED YOU IS LESS THAN 200 FEET.
19:27:48 SO WITH THE LAST -- THIS IS AN APPROVED PD.
19:27:50 THIS IS ON RATTLESNAKE POINT.
19:27:55 WHAT YOU APPROVED FOR NEWPORT, WE ARE TALKING 840 FEET.
19:27:56 319 FEET.
19:27:59 ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MR. DINGFELDER ASKED IS HOW MANY
19:28:03 FEET AWAY IS THE NEW PROJECT FROM -- THANK YOU,
19:28:04 SUZANNE.
19:28:07 FROM THE NEW BUILDING.
19:28:10 FROM WHERE THE HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS ARE STORED.
19:28:13 LET'S ZOOM ON THAT TO SHOW YOU.
19:28:23 THESE BUILDINGS ARE 1600 -- OVER 1600 FEET, 1700 FEET.
19:28:27 AND POINT IN BRINGING THAT UP IS THIS.
19:28:31 THIS IS HOW IT HAS DEVELOPED THROUGHOUT TIME.
19:28:31 INDUSTRIAL USE.
19:28:36 WE ARE ADJACENT TO CHEMICAL FORMULATORS, WHICH IS WHY
19:28:39 CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DON'T
19:28:40 APPLY TO US.
19:28:43 WE HAVE TO APPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT IS IN
19:28:44 EFFECT TODAY.
19:28:47 DAVID HEY, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, IF YOU DON'T
19:28:52 MIND.
19:28:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THERE HE IS.
19:29:00 GO AHEAD.
19:29:02 HE IS ON.
19:29:04 >> YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT
19:29:08 REGARDLESS OF ITS PROXIMITY OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS IS
19:29:12 CONSISTENT AND -- WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
19:29:15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS APPLIED TO THIS PROPERTY?
19:29:17 >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT.
19:29:19 IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY DIRECTION FOR
19:29:23 RATTLESNAKE POINT AND THE UNDERLYING COMMUNITY MIXED
19:29:25 USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
19:29:26 >> THANK YOU.
19:29:29 ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS I WANT TO NOTE TO COUNCIL IS
19:29:33 THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATOR IS NOT HERE OBJECTING TONIGHT.
19:29:36 THEY HAVEN'T FILED A LETTER OF OPPOSITION.
19:29:40 YOU NOTICE AT THE WHITFIELD THEY DID COME TO ADDRESS.
19:29:42 THEY WERE DIRECTLY ADJACENT.
19:29:45 CHEMICAL FORMULATORS IS NOTICEABLY ABSENT AN THAT IS
19:29:46 FOR A REASON.
19:29:51 CHEMICAL FORMULATOR AS MISS IRA HAS SAID HAVE SPECIFIC
19:29:53 SAFETY MEASURES IN PLACE.
19:29:56 AND OBVIOUSLY IF THEY HAD CONCERNS, THEY WOULD BE HERE
19:29:56 TONIGHT.
19:30:02 MISS IRA, YOU MENTIONED BOTH AIRPLANES AND ELECTRICITY.
19:30:08 SO ARE YOU CITING REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AND THE SAFETY
19:30:11 -- YOU SAID SOMETHING TO ME AT ONE POINT.
19:30:13 LET ME ASK THE QUESTION DIFFERENTLY.
19:30:16 YOU SAID PEOPLE GET CONCERNED ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS
19:30:21 BECAUSE THEY ARE HIGH IMPACT BUT LOW FREQUENCY EVENTS.
19:30:26 IN OTHER WORDS, THESE THINGS HARDLY EVER HAPPEN, IF
19:30:28 THEY DO PEOPLE HEAR ABOUT THEM.
19:30:30 LIKE A PLANE CRASH.
19:30:32 IS THAT CORRECT?
19:30:33 >> RIGHT.
19:30:37 IT'S CONSIDERED A LOW FREQUENCY HIGH EFFECT EVENT.
19:30:41 THAT IS THE WAY WE TALK ABOUT THAT IN RISK MITIGATION.
19:30:47 BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE -- THE COUNCILMAN'S
19:30:52 COMMENTS ABOUT THE RELEASES THAT OCCURRED IN THE PAST.
19:30:53 >> YES, PLEASE.
19:30:57 >> JUST BRIEFLY THE RELEASE IN 1997 THAT OCCURRED WAS
19:31:02 ACTUALLY BEFORE THE EPA'S RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN WAS
19:31:04 FULLY IMPLEMENTED.
19:31:07 IMPLEMENTATION WASN'T REQUIRED UNTIL 1999.
19:31:10 THAT IS THE FIRST YEAR IT CAME INTO EFFECT.
19:31:13 AND OSHA HAD A VERY SIMILAR REGULATION CALLED THE OSHA
19:31:17 PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS THAT
19:31:22 CAME INTO EFFECT EARLIER IN 1994.
19:31:27 HAD A COUPLE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD TO COME IN
19:31:27 COMPLIANCE.
19:31:32 AND BOTH OF THOSE RULES WERE ENACTED TO PREVENT
19:31:35 ACCIDENTAL RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS.
19:31:38 TOOK FACILITIES A WHILE TO COME INTO FULLY COMPLIANT
19:31:41 AND ENACT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS.
19:31:44 BECAUSE THE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE THE SAFETY DEVICES,
19:31:50 THE PERIODIC HAZARD ANALYSES, THE OPERATING PROCEDURES,
19:31:52 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS, TRAINING, ALL THE THINGS I
19:31:55 MENTIONED -- AND MORE THAT I MENTIONED BEFORE ABOUT THE
19:32:00 COMPONENTS OF THE SAFETY PROGRAMS OF -- OF THE CHEMICAL
19:32:03 SAFETY PROGRAM THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATORS HAS.
19:32:08 SO THE FACT THAT THEY HAD A RELEASE IN 1997, I AM NOT
19:32:10 CONDONING A RELEASE OBVIOUSLY.
19:32:14 BUT THEY HAD A RELEASE IN '97 BEFORE THE REGULATIONS
19:32:17 WERE IN EFFECT AND ANOTHER RELEASE IN 2003 AND THEY
19:32:19 HAVEN'T HAD A RELEASE IN 18 YEARS.
19:32:23 OSHA VISITED THE FACILITY IN 2007, AND THEY HAD TWO
19:32:25 VIOLATIONS, BUT THEY WEREN'T RELATED TO THE CHLORINE
19:32:26 SYSTEM.
19:32:32 AND WHEN THEY VISITED THE FACILITY IN 2012, THEY SAW NO
19:32:32 VIOLATIONS.
19:32:36 AND A PICTURE OF THE FACILITY COME INTO COMPLIANCE AND
19:32:39 MANAGING THEIR FACILITY MORE SAFELY SO WHEN I TALKED
19:32:42 ABOUT THE SAFEGUARDS PARTICIPATE IN PLACE INITIALLY, I
19:32:46 WAS FOCUSING ON THE CURRENT CONDITION OF CHEMICAL
19:32:47 FORMULATORS.
19:32:49 I THINK IT SHOWS THAT THEY HAVE IMPROVED OVER THE
19:32:50 YEARS.
19:32:51 AND I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE
19:32:53 CONSIDERED.
19:32:56 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TESTIMONY.
19:32:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:33:01 AND THAT'S IT, MA'AM.
19:33:02 >> YES.
19:33:03 YES, SIR.
19:33:04 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
19:33:07 WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
19:33:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON, IS THAT YOU --
19:33:12 >>BILL CARLSON: I APOLOGIZE, EVERYBODY.
19:33:14 THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED TO ME BEFORE.
19:33:16 USUALLY -- I RESEARCH CAREFULLY WHETHER I HAVE A
19:33:19 CONFLICT LIKE ALL OF DO YOU AND WORK IT OUT WITH MARTY
19:33:22 IN ADVANCE, AND THIS ONE CAME UP AT THE LAST MINUTE.
19:33:26 MARTY AND THE ATTORNEYS HAVE ASKED ME JUST TO STATE ON
19:33:29 THE RECORD THE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT IS THAT WE
19:33:33 BELIEVE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A COMPANY OR INDIVIDUAL
19:33:39 THAT MY COMPANY DOES BUSINESS WITH MAY HAVE AN INDIRECT
19:33:41 INTEREST IN THIS.
19:33:43 A DIRECT OR INDIRECT FROM IN THIS.
19:33:47 SO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE OBJECTIVITY, I NEED TO
19:33:48 ABSTAIN.
19:33:53 SO I APOLOGIZE AGAIN TO EVERYBODY, THANK YOU.
19:33:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
19:33:54 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
19:33:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL NOT DO THIS,
19:34:02 BUT MISS BATSEL PUT UP A MAP -- TWO DIFFERENT MAPS WE
19:34:04 HAVEN'T SEEN DURING THE DIRECT TESTIMONY.
19:34:09 MISS B A TSEL, I WILL LET YOU DECIDE WHO I ASK THE
19:34:10 QUESTION.
19:34:12 YOU TESTIFIED OF THE TWO MAPS.
19:34:14 I AM COMFORTABLE ASKING YOU THE QUESTION.
19:34:19 PUT THE TWO MAPS UP STARTING WITH THE ONE IN PALMETTO
19:34:30 BEACH.
19:34:32 AND IF YOU CAN ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT.
19:34:43 YOU HAD IT ZOOMED IN BEFORE SLIGHTLY.
19:34:50 OKAY, I'M PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH PALMETTO BEACH, BUT I AM
19:34:53 NOT SUPPOSED TO TESTIFY, BUT THOSE ARE -- TO MY
19:34:57 RECOLLECTION, REASONABILITY THOSE ALL SINGLE FAMILY
19:35:00 HOMES BEEN THERE A LONG, LONG TIME.
19:35:04 NOT LARGE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT THIS COUNCIL
19:35:08 MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT BE APPROVING?
19:35:14 WE CAN'T HEAR YOU, I AM SORRY.
19:35:19 >> WHETHER IT IS PALMETTO OR WHETHER IT IS DAVIS ISLAND
19:35:24 OR HARBOR ISLAND OR WHETHER IT IS PORT OF TAMPA, THE
19:35:27 CITY OR -- AND THE CITY COUNCIL AT THOSE TIMES
19:35:32 THROUGHOUT OUR CITY'S HISTORY APPROVED RESIDENTIAL
19:35:36 DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NEXT TO INDUSTRIAL USES.
19:35:36 THIS --
19:35:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU ARE NOT TESTIFY THAT YOU KNOW
19:35:43 IF THOSE HOUSES WERE THERE FIRST OR THE STORAGE TANKS
19:35:45 WERE THERE FIRST.
19:35:47 YOU DON'T HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE, DO YOU?
19:35:49 >> I DON'T HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE FOR THIS PARTICULAR --
19:35:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY OTHER QUESTION.
19:35:58 CAN YOU GO TO THE NICE AERIAL TO THE THREE LINES ON IT
19:36:05 TO YOUR THREE BUILDINGS PROPOSED.
19:36:07 OKAY.
19:36:10 I AM HESITANT TO ASK THE LAWYER, BUT YOU PUT THIS UP,
19:36:13 AND I THINK THE ANSWER IS PRETTY SIMPLE.
19:36:16 THE -- THE TWO PROJECTS THAT YOU POINTED TO EARLIER,
19:36:20 NEWPORT, WHICH IS ACROSS THE WATER GOING BACK TOWARD
19:36:26 THE CITY AND SAGET, WHICH IS FURTHER CLOSER TO THE
19:36:29 MAINLAND, THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO UP AND DOWN TYSON TO
19:36:34 ESCAPE A CHLORINE PLUME, THAT'S CORRECT?
19:36:38 THE BOTTOM LINE IS IF THE CHLORINE PLUME --
19:36:39 >> I AM SORRY.
19:36:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME FINISH.
19:36:44 IF THAT PLUME WAS COMING TOWARD THE SAGET PROPERTY
19:36:48 WHICH I THINK YOU HAVE IN THAT SQUARE THERE OR THE
19:36:50 NEWPORT PROPERTY WHICH YOU HAVE IN THE BLUE AT THE TOP
19:36:55 CORNER, IF THEY WERE -- IF THOSE FOLKS WERE ABLE TO
19:37:00 RUN, THEY COULD RUN INLAND AND HAVE SOMEWHERE TO GO.
19:37:00 OKAY.
19:37:05 MY ONLY QUESTION TO YOU IS, ISN'T THERE A DIFFERENT IN
19:37:08 REGARD TO A PLUME THAT IS HEADED OUT TOWARD YOUR
19:37:11 PROPOSED PROJECT WHERE THOSE PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE
19:37:14 ANYWHERE TO GO BECAUSE THE CHLORINE PLANT WILL BE
19:37:16 BETWEEN THEM.
19:37:19 AND THE ONLY PLACE TO GO WOULD BE THE WATER, THAT'S
19:37:20 CORRECT?
19:37:22 >> I WOULD HAVE TO SAYS THERE ALREADY SUBSTANTIAL
19:37:26 COMPETENT EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD THAT THE APPROPRIATE
19:37:27 THING WOULD BE SHELTER IN PLACE.
19:37:29 THAT IS ALREADY PART OF YOUR RECORD.
19:37:32 YOU ARE ASSUMING FACTS THAT AREN'T INTO THE RECORD
19:37:35 SAYING THAT A PLUME IS GOING TO GO ONE DIRECTION OR THE
19:37:36 OTHER.
19:37:40 MISS IRA IN HER PROFESSIONAL EXPERT TESTIMONY GAVE
19:37:43 EXTENSIVE TESTIMONY AT THE LAST HEARING ABOUT THE
19:37:46 APPROPRIATE SHELTERING IN PLACE THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE
19:37:48 THOSE FOLKS TO EVACUATE.
19:37:51 IN FACT IT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO STAY RIGHT WHERE THEY
19:37:51 ARE.
19:37:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T WANT TO BELABOR THIS.
19:38:00 BUT THE NINE PEOPLE IN GRANITESVILLE WERE PROBABLY
19:38:03 TRYING SHELTER IN PLACE CLOSE TO THAT FACILITY AS WELL.
19:38:03 THANK YOU.
19:38:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:38:06 ANYTHING ELSE?
19:38:10 MISS BATSEL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE A FINAL WORD
19:38:12 ANOTHER MINUTE AND THEN CLOSE THIS OUT.
19:38:13 ANYTHING ELSE?
19:38:13 >> YES, THANK YOU.
19:38:18 I WOULD JUST REMIND COUNCIL THAT THE STANDARD BY WHICH
19:38:21 YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT THIS PROJECT IS SUBSTANTIAL
19:38:23 COMPETENT EVIDENCE.
19:38:26 WE HAVE PROVIDED ALL EXPERT TESTIMONY ON ALL OF THESE
19:38:28 TECHNICAL ISSUES INCLUDING SAFETY.
19:38:31 AND THE ONLY COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT YOU
19:38:34 HEARD WITH REGARD TO THE MATTER HAS COME WITH MISS IRA
19:38:39 AND THE MAPS THAT I PROVIDED WHAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED
19:38:42 FROM THE RECORD OF 2007 IS NOT RELEVANT OF WHAT YOU ARE
19:38:43 LOOKING AT TODAY.
19:38:45 WE BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE CHECKED ALL THE CATEGORIES FOR
19:38:49 COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND HONESTLY WE FEEL
19:38:52 THIS IS A REALLY GOOD PROJECT AND REQUEST APPROVAL.
19:38:53 THANK YOU.
19:38:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE.
19:38:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO MOVED.
19:39:01 >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND.
19:39:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, I APOLOGIZE,
19:39:05 SIR.
19:39:08 PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF.
19:39:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I REALLY APPRECIATE THE
19:39:11 OPPORTUNITY.
19:39:13 AND I HAVE BEEN THINKING AS THE CONVERSATION HAS BEEN
19:39:16 GOING ON FOR SOME TIME ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS REGARDING
19:39:26 THE AMMONIA, CITRIC NITRATE, WHATEVER IT IS AND I WAS
19:39:30 LISTENING AND GOING BACK IN HISTORY IN MY MIND, THAT I
19:39:34 REMEMBER THERE WAS A COMPANY IN THE MUDDLE OF -- OH,
19:39:38 CLOSE TO THE INTERSTATE ON ARMENIA AND CHESTNUT IN
19:39:48 CALLED SOUTHERN MILL CREEK AND THIS CHLORINE -- I NEVER
19:39:53 WENT INTO THE JOINT -- THAT OPERATION, I WILL SAY AND I
19:39:55 LIVED IN CHESTNUT STREET.
19:39:58 THE FIRST HOUSE THAT MY WIFE AND I EVER BOUGHT.
19:40:00 AND GUESS WHAT A SPILL ONE NIGHT AT 2:00 IN THE
19:40:01 MORNING.
19:40:05 THE GAS LEAK OR WHATEVER -- HOWEVER THAT CAME OUT.
19:40:09 WE -- THE POLICE OFFICERS AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT,
19:40:13 WHICH IS ONLY A BLOCK AWAY FROM EITHER SIDE WHERE I AM
19:40:17 AT IN SOUTHERN MILL CREEK ON STATION 9 WENT OUT AND
19:40:20 KNOCKED ON DOORS ALONG WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND
19:40:23 TOLD US TO STAY INDOORS AND CLOSE THE WINDOWS AND TURN
19:40:26 OFF THE AIR CONDITIONER.
19:40:29 BUT AT THAT TIME, I DIDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT AIR
19:40:31 CONDITIONER BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE IT.
19:40:35 BACK IN THE EARLY '60S, '62 AND '63.
19:40:39 I GO BACK AND REMEMBER MY CHILDHOOD DAYS AND
19:40:44 CHANNELSIDE AND RIGHT ABOUT WHERE THE AQUARIUM IS
19:40:54 TODAY, MAYBE A LITTLE BIT TO THE NORTH, CITRIC NITRATE
19:40:56 40, 50 FEET IN THE AIR IN VOLUMES.
19:40:59 HARBOUR ISLAND.
19:41:06 WASN'T NAMED ALL THE TIME HARBOUR ISLAND.
19:41:08 IT WAS STET ISLAND.
19:41:10 WHAT HAPPENED?
19:41:11 THEY WILL SILOS.
19:41:13 BIG SILOS.
19:41:14 OF WHAT?
19:41:15 PHOSPHATE.
19:41:17 PHOSPHATE IS VERY DANGEROUS.
19:41:20 IT IS VERY BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH.
19:41:21 BAD TO BREATHE IT.
19:41:24 JUST LIKE GASS.
19:41:29 AND IT ALSO HAD -- OF ALL THE THINGS THAT WAS THE EARLY
19:41:31 -- THE MID-'70S.
19:41:36 AND THE PEOPLE ON DAVIS ISLAND, GOD BLESS THEM, THE
19:41:42 PROBLEM THAT THEY HAD WHEN THE WIND BLEW FROM EAST TO
19:41:45 WEST AND THOSE ISLANDS WERE IN OPERATION LOADING AND
19:41:50 UNLOADING THE PHOSPHATE, HALF DAVIS ISLAND TURNED A
19:41:52 DIFFERENT COLOR.
19:41:56 THE CARS, THE WINDOW SILLS, OUTSIDE, EVERYTHING.
19:42:00 THAT WAS BIG COMPLAINT WE HAD BACK THEN AND I SEE THAT
19:42:07 WE STILL HAVE THE SAME COMPLAINT IN DIFFERENT AREA.
19:42:09 THAT WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THOSE AREAS.
19:42:11 WHAT HAPPENED TO STATEN ISLAND.
19:42:14 IT WAS MANUFACTURER OR PRODUCT HOLDING SOMETHING THAT
19:42:17 WAS MANUFACTURED FOR SHIPPING ALL OVER THE WORLD.
19:42:22 THERE WAS A RAILROAD, LITTLE BRIDGE THAT TOOK CARS IN
19:42:22 AND OUT.
19:42:26 THEY LOADED THROUGH SHIPS, I IMAGINE.
19:42:33 IT IS NOW PREMIERE LOCATION FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
19:42:36 LET'S LOOK AT THE CITRIC NITRATE.
19:42:39 AND I AM NOT TRYING TO SAY ANYBODY ONE WAY OR THE
19:42:39 OTHER.
19:42:43 JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND ALL -- I AM JUST TRYING TO
19:42:46 UNDERSTAND THE CONVERSATION WE HAD HERE IN AN HOUR AND
19:42:48 45 MINUTES.
19:42:50 WHICH IS VERY GOOD.
19:42:51 CONVERSATION IS VERY HELPFUL.
19:42:54 AND I ALWAYS HAD THE LAST WORD WITH MY WIFE.
19:42:57 THAT IS WHY I SAID THAT, THEY WERE YES, MA'AM.
19:43:00 BUT WHEN I AM LOOKING THAT THE AND AT THE CITRIC
19:43:02 NITRATE.
19:43:04 WHAT IS THERE NOW?
19:43:05 NO MORE.
19:43:06 COCA-COLA PLANT.
19:43:08 NO MORE BANANA DOCKS.
19:43:11 NO MORE CITRIC NITRATE.
19:43:16 NO MORE OTHER -- HARD-WORKING PEOPLE HAD TO DO LABOR
19:43:18 WORK IN MASS AMOUNTS.
19:43:25 IT IS NOW ANOTHER AREA THAT IS A NOTIFICATION OF WHAT
19:43:28 THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS BECOME.
19:43:32 NOT WHAT IT WAS, BUT WHAT IT IS AND IT IS STILL
19:43:34 GROWING.
19:43:40 THE CITRIC NITRATE AREA HAS CHANGED FROM WHAT IT WAS.
19:43:46 THE RESIDENTIAL -- HIGH APARTMENT -- HIGH-END
19:43:50 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL BUT ON THE CLEAN.
19:43:52 NOT WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE.
19:44:03 SO WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AREA -- DID THEY WANT TO STAY
19:44:03 THERE?
19:44:05 THEY SAID THEY DID.
19:44:08 BUT THEY DIDN'T REALLY WANT TO BE THERE IN CASE
19:44:10 SOMETHING HAPPENED AND THEY WERE SURROUNDED BY
19:44:12 RESIDENTIAL.
19:44:16 JUST THINK OF THAT FOR SECOND.
19:44:20 BOUGHT OUT BY A DEVELOPER AND HAVEN'T BEEN DEVELOPED.
19:44:24 AT SOME POINT THERE ARE PLANS FOR.
19:44:25 I AM SURE THEY ARE.
19:44:29 WHAT I AM SAYING IS EVERYTHING CHANGES WHEN A CITY IS
19:44:32 INCREASING IN POPULATION BECAUSE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
19:44:34 CITY HARDLY EVER CHANGE.
19:44:37 THE LAST BOUNDARY CHANGE WE HAVE WAS THE ACQUISITION OF
19:44:41 NEW TAMPA OF THE COUNTY WHERE IT WAS VOTED INTO THE
19:44:42 CITY.
19:44:45 AND THAT WAS MY GOD, IT SEEMS LIKE YESTERDAY BUT THAT
19:44:49 WAS 34 YEARS AGO IN PIECES.
19:44:53 AND IT'S -- LIFE CHANGES.
19:44:54 WHAT PRESENTED.
19:44:57 THAT MAY BE WHAT I LIKE OR YOU LIKE AND WHAT YOU WANT
19:44:58 OR DON'T WANT.
19:45:03 BUT IT IS INCUMBENT TO UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE THING.
19:45:07 IF THE WIND BLOWS ONE WAY -- AND I AM NOT AN EXPERT.
19:45:11 I DON'T INTEND TO BE ONE AND I DON'T WANT TO BE ONE,
19:45:13 YOU WILL GET THE EFFECTS OF WHATEVER IS IN THAT
19:45:15 MANUFACTURING PLANT.
19:45:19 THE WIND BLOWS THE OTHER WAY, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET
19:45:22 IT.
19:45:25 JUST LIKE WE HAVE A HURRICANE, IF IT COMES YOUR WAY,
19:45:25 YOU ARE GOING TO GET IT.
19:45:29 IF IT GOES THE OTHER WAY, SOMEBODY ELSE WILL GET IT.
19:45:32 BUT WE HAVE NO CONTROL IN A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE WANT
19:45:37 TO DO OR NOT DO, BUT WE HAVE NATURE.
19:45:39 WE HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF NATURE.
19:45:44 AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE IN THE POSITION WE ARE IN TODAY.
19:45:46 TO CHANGE THINGS.
19:45:49 DO YOU REALLY WANT TO LEAVE THAT PART OR ANY PART OF
19:45:58 THE CITY FOR ANY TYPE OF THIS TYPE OF MANUFACTURING?
19:46:01 DREW PARK USED TO BE AN AIR FORCE BASE.
19:46:04 NO LONGER AN AIR FORCE BASE.
19:46:05 IT IS CHANGING.
19:46:12 AND MORE LIKELY WILL CONTINUE TO CHANGE AS YOU SEE MORE
19:46:14 AND MORE DEMAND FOR RESIDENTIAL.
19:46:17 SO WHAT I AM SAYING IS, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT NOT ONLY
19:46:23 WHAT IS THERE BUT WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC AND IN GENERAL
19:46:27 WANT IN POPULATION MOVES IN.
19:46:27 I DON'T KNOW.
19:46:32 I CAN ONLY TELL YOU THAT IF IT WASN'T THAT THE STATE OF
19:46:36 NEW YORK AND NEW ENGLAND, MOST OF THE RESIDENTS MOVE
19:46:38 AWAY WANT TO COME TO FLORIDA.
19:46:41 I AM NOT SAYING THIS BECAUSE I AM AN EXPERT.
19:46:43 I AM SAYING THIS BECAUSE I READ IT SOMEWHERE.
19:46:47 AND MOST OF THEM WANT TO COME TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
19:46:52 I THINK THAT TAXATION OF TAXES IN THE NORTH AND
19:46:57 NORTHEAST ARE GETTING PEOPLE WEARY.
19:47:01 WEARING THEM DOWN AND WANT A BRIEF SIGH OF RELIEF.
19:47:02 I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT IT IS.
19:47:06 SO IT IS INCUMBENT TO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THERE IS A
19:47:13 COMPONENT THAT IS DANGEROUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH, THAT
19:47:16 COMPONENT WILL REALIZE THAT AND THAT COMPONENT SHOULD
19:47:23 AND WILL BE MOVING WHEN SOMEBODY -- AND MOVE TO ANOTHER
19:47:27 AREA WHERE THE RAILCARS ARE VERY ACCESSIBLE.
19:47:31 AND THE COUNTY AREAS WHERE THERE IS VACANT LAND AND
19:47:32 LOTS OF IT.
19:47:37 THE CITY OF TAMPA IS IN A POSITION NOW WHERE -- WHEN I
19:47:41 WAS A KID A LOT WAS $500 OR $1,000.
19:47:44 THAT IS $150,000 FOR THE SAME LOT.
19:47:47 AND THAT'S HOW LIFE IS.
19:47:51 I CAN'T TELL YOU WHAT SOMETHING TODAY WILL BE WORTH
19:47:52 TOMORROW.
19:47:55 THAT DEPENDS ON THE BUYER AND THE SELLER WILLING TO PAY
19:47:58 WHAT THE BUYER WANTS AND THE BUYER WILLING TO ACCEPT
19:48:00 WHAT THE PRICE IS.
19:48:02 SO THAT'S HOW LIFE IS.
19:48:05 I AM LOOKING AT IT VERY REALISTICALLY.
19:48:06 AND THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY.
19:48:08 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:48:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:48:11 MOTION TO CLOSE?
19:48:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
19:48:14 >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND.
19:48:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND.
19:48:18 HEARING IS CLOSED.
19:48:24 WHAT THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
19:48:30 I KNOW WE WILL TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS.
19:48:36 NO, AFTER -- AFTER -- WE ONLY HAVE TEN MORE CASES SO
19:48:38 WE ARE GOOD.
19:48:43 WILL ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION?
19:48:47 >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR, LET ME EXPLAIN.
19:48:50 I WILL READ THIS AND SEE WHERE IT GOES.
19:48:52 WE HAD A LOT DISCUSSION HERE TONIGHT AND COUNCILMAN
19:48:56 MIRANDA SAID IT IS RIGHT THAT WE HAVE BEEN ON THIS FOR
19:48:58 TWO HOURS ALMOST AND IT IS RIGHT THAT WE HAVE BEEN ON
19:49:01 THIS FOR ALMOST TWO HOURS BECAUSE THIS IS A REALLY
19:49:03 COMPELLING ISSUE ON BOTH SIDES.
19:49:05 AND THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVE COME FORWARD,
19:49:08 SOME THINGS THAT WE CAN RELY UPON, SOME THINGS THAT WE
19:49:08 CAN'T.
19:49:11 YOU KNOW WHEN WE TAKE A LOOK AT THE CHANGES THAT WERE
19:49:14 MADE SOME YEARS AGO AND THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, AN
19:49:15 OBJECTION TO THOSE CHANGES.
19:49:18 I KNOW THAT CAN CAUSE A LOT OF FRUSTRATION AND WHAT
19:49:20 NOT, AND THAT IS VERY REASONABLE.
19:49:24 SOME OF THE -- A LOT OF DIFFERENT ISSUES BROUGHT UP I
19:49:26 THINK JUSTIFY A GREAT DEAL OF ROBUST DISCUSSION ON
19:49:27 THIS.
19:49:30 THIS IS NOT OBVIOUSLY AN EASY VOTE.
19:49:33 NOBODY LIKES TO VOTE ON -- ON SOMETHING WHERE PEOPLE
19:49:36 ARE VERY, VERY CONTESTED AND ALL THAT OTHER GOOD STUFF.
19:49:40 AND SO THIS TAKES A LOT OF CONSIDERATION IN IT.
19:49:43 THE FACTS THAT I LOOK AT THIS -- I -- LIKE ALL OF US,
19:49:47 CAME IN HERE WITH, YOU KNOW, AN OPEN MIND ON -- ON BOTH
19:49:51 SIDES IN THIS REGARD AND CERTAIN THINGS JUST STICK OUT
19:49:53 TO ME, SO TO SPEAK.
19:49:55 THAT JUST STICK OUT TO ME.
19:49:58 FIRST, YOU HAVE THE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED FOOTPRINT.
19:50:01 BUILDINGS GOING DOWN FROM FIVE TO THREE UNITS, DOWN
19:50:05 FROM 25%, DOWN NOT ONLY FROM WHAT THEY WERE LOOKING AT
19:50:09 A MONTH OR TWO AGO, WHENEVER THAT WAS, BUT ALSO FROM
19:50:12 THEIR ENTITLEMENT OF WHAT THE PRESENT LAW SAYS THAT
19:50:14 THEY ARE ENTITLED TO.
19:50:15 THEY ARE GOING MUCH LESS THAN THAT.
19:50:18 WE HAVE A POSITIVE CITY STAFF REPORT.
19:50:20 POSITIVE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT.
19:50:24 YOU KNOW, THINGS THAT ARE FOR ME VERY, VERY COMPELLING.
19:50:27 AND THESE ARE FACTS THAT ARE PIVOTAL FOR ME IN THREE
19:50:27 WAYS.
19:50:31 NUMBER ONE, THEY ARE THE RULES THAT WE ARE GOVERNED BY
19:50:34 HERE IN CITY COUNCIL.
19:50:38 THOSE ARE THE RULES THAT WE ARE TO RELY UPON ONE WAY OR
19:50:38 ANOTHER.
19:50:42 NUMBER TWO, THOSE ARE THE RULES THAT PROPERTY OWNERS
19:50:45 RELIED UPON PURCHASING THE PROPERTY AND GOING FORWARD
19:50:46 WITH IT.
19:50:49 AND NUMBER THREE, THOSE ARE THE RULES IN COURT THAT IF
19:50:54 WE DENY WILL LOOK AT IN APPLYING SOME LEVEL OF SCRUTINY
19:50:57 IN A DECISION WE MAKE IT GOES DOWN THAT WAY.
19:51:00 A LOT OF FOLKS ARE TALKING ABOUT THINGS THAT HAPPENED
19:51:01 IN THE PAST, ETC.
19:51:04 YOU KNOW, COMP PLAN CHANGES IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT
19:51:06 COULD BE POTENTIALLY TALKED ABOUT.
19:51:09 MAYBE A LITTLE TOO LATE, RIGHT.
19:51:12 BUT CERTAINLY AN ISSUE TO LOOK AT THERE, BUT IT IS
19:51:13 RIGHT THAT WE TALK ABOUT THIS.
19:51:15 IT IS RIGHT THAT WE TALK ABOUT THIS.
19:51:18 MY FEAR IS THAT IF WE VOTE IT DOWN, WE ARE MAKING
19:51:23 PROMISES TO A COMMUNITY -- PROMISES, I GUESS, IF YOU
19:51:25 WILL, WRITING CHECKS THAT WHEN IT COMES TIME, WE ARE
19:51:29 GOING TO HAVE INSUFFICIENT FUNDS FOR, SO TO SPEAK AND
19:51:32 MAKING PROMISES TO A COMMUNITY THAT WE CAN VOTE DOWN
19:51:35 SOMETHING TODAY AND GIVE IT A YEAR OR SIX MONTHS DOWN
19:51:37 THE ROAD, SEQUEL TO THIS.
19:51:41 AND THAT SEQUEL WILL HAVE SOME LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
19:51:44 THIS -- THIS ISN'T A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE THE WAY WE
19:51:45 LOOK AT.
19:51:48 A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS.
19:51:51 I ALWAYS SAY A LOT OF THINGS ARE NOT BLACK AND WHITE.
19:51:52 THERE IS GRAY.
19:51:55 A LOT OF GRAY HERE AND WHAT NEIGHBORS A DIFFICULT ISSUE
19:51:57 AND WHATNOT.
19:51:59 NOT JUST DEALING OF THE ISSUES THAT MANY HAVE TALKED
19:52:02 ABOUT BUT AN AREA OF TAMPA THAT WE HAVE HEARD A LOT
19:52:05 FROM IN CITY COUNCIL AND OBVIOUSLY THAT IS A VERY
19:52:06 COMPELLING ISSUE.
19:52:10 BUT, AGAIN, MY POSITION IS, IF WE MAKE A DENIAL, THERE
19:52:12 IS GOING TO BE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THAT.
19:52:15 I REALLY, REALLY DO FEEL.
19:52:16 JUST MY POSITION.
19:52:19 SO I WILL PUT THIS UP THE FLAG POLE AND LET'S SEE WHAT
19:52:20 HAPPENS.
19:52:22 WE ARE ON NUMBER 1.
19:52:23 WE ARE ON NUMBER 1.
19:52:25 SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND PROCEED THAT.
19:52:28 MOVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION
19:52:33 ORDINANCE OF THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 5430 AND
19:52:39 5440 W. TYSON AVENUE FROM ZONING DISTRICT IH INDUSTRIAL
19:52:44 HEAVY TO PD MULTIFAMILY, SING FAMILY, RESTAURANTS,
19:52:51 RETAIL SALES PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:52:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
19:52:54 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
19:52:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WILL SECOND.
19:53:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO.
19:53:01 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:53:05 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:53:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:53:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:53:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO.
19:53:15 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON ABSTAINING.
19:53:17 GUDES AND DINGFELDER VOTING NO.
19:53:22 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:53:24 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR TIME TONIGHT.
19:53:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:04:25 IN RECESS UNTIL 8:00.
20:04:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL PLEASE.
20:04:30 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
20:04:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
20:04:34 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
20:04:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
20:04:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
20:04:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
20:04:42 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT.
20:04:43 MR. SHELBY.
20:04:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I WANT TO BRING TO
20:04:47 COUNCIL'S ATTENTION AND PARTICULARLY, I WANT TO REMIND
20:04:52 THE PUBLIC OF THE FACT THAT IF YOU ARE REREGISTERED
20:04:58 THERE IS A CHAT FUNCTION ON THE GO TO MEETING WEBBED.
20:05:03 IN AR PLATFORM, THAT IS BE NEEDED ONLY FOR TECHNICAL
20:05:06 ISSUE TO THE ORGANIZERS.
20:05:09 THIS IS NOT TO BE USED TO COMMUNICATE TO ANYBODY ON
20:05:13 SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES DURING A CITY COUNCIL MEETING. SO I
20:05:16 AM GOING TO ASK MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC DO NOT USE THE
20:05:19 CHAT FUNCTION TO COMMUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL DURING A
20:05:19 MEETING.
20:05:21 IT IS IMPROPER TO DO SO.
20:05:24 AND I AM GOING TO ASK EACH MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL IF
20:05:29 FOR SOME REASON DO YOU SEE A CHAT COME IN DURING
20:05:31 MEETING THAT ATTRACTS YOUR ATTENTION AND RELATED TO ANY
20:05:37 ITEM ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, THAT YOU DISCLOSE THAT ON THE
20:05:39 RECORD SO THAT ISSUE CAN BE ADDRESSED.
20:05:44 LIKEWISE, I WANT TO REMIND CITY COUNCIL TO BE MINDFUL
20:05:48 OF THE FACT THAT PEOPLE MAY VERY WELL BE ATTEMPTING TO
20:05:50 COMMUNICATE TO YOU VIA E-MAIL.
20:05:55 AND, AGAIN, TO DO SO DURING A MEETING AND YOU NOT BEING
20:06:04 ABLE TO, A, SEE IT -- OR LET ME STAY THIS, IF YOU DO
20:06:07 SEE IT, IT IS INCUMBENT UPON YOU TO DISCLOSE IT.
20:06:12 MY ADVICE TO YOU WOULD BE TO NOT ACCEPT AND NOT READ
20:06:19 COMMUNICATIONS THAT ARE SENT TO YOU EX PARTE DURING A
20:06:21 QUASI JUDICIAL EVENING MEETING.
20:06:24 I WILL CAUTION THE PUBLIC DO NOT ATTEMPT TO COMMUNICATE
20:06:27 WITH CITY COUNCILMEMBERS PRIVATELY.
20:06:31 AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS IF YOU DO COME UPON THAT IT IS
20:06:35 AN EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION AND IT IS INCUMBENT ON YOU TO
20:06:39 DISCLOSE THAT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
20:06:40 THANK YOU.
20:06:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:06:43 ALL RIGHT.
20:06:48 WE ARE ON ITEM NUMBER 2.
20:06:51 GO AHEAD.
20:06:54 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU.
20:06:58 LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:07:03 FILE NO. REZ-21-09.
20:07:06 THE APPLICATION REPRESENTED BY JOHN LUM AND STEVE
20:07:07 MICHELINI.
20:07:13 THE PROPERTY 210 N. HUBERT AVENUE FROM RS-50 TO RM-24
20:07:18 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
20:07:22 I WILL HAND IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND IF
20:07:24 I CAN HAVE THE CONTROL BACK FOR MY REPORT.
20:07:29 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR
20:07:31 PLANNING COMMISSION, AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:07:36 SHOW MY SCREEN.
20:07:37 HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE IT.
20:07:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
20:07:41 GO AHEAD, SIR.
20:07:44 HEY HAITI SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST SHORE
20:07:47 PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST SHORE
20:07:48 PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:07:54 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY CHARLES B.
20:08:01 WILLIAMS PARK 300 FEET NORTH OF THE KITE.
20:08:05 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS 600 FEET SOUTH AT NORTH HUBERT
20:08:06 AND WEST KENNEDY.
20:08:13 THAT WEST KENNEDY IS SERVED BY WEST 30 WHICH CONNECT TO
20:08:16 WEST SHORE PLAZA AND MARION TRANSIT CENTER DOWNTOWN.
20:08:19 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION
20:08:22 ZONE.
20:08:25 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:08:27 YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT IN THE CENTER.
20:08:29 TO THE SOUTH YOU CAN SEE WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
20:08:32 THIS IS NORTH HUBERT RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH UP TO THE
20:08:36 INTERSTATE AND NORTH B IS ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY
20:08:37 BOUNDARY.
20:08:42 YOU CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS A MIXTURE OF
20:08:46 RESIDENTIAL TYPES, MULTIFAMILY, TOWNHOMES, SOME
20:08:49 SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED.
20:08:53 THE WEST SHORE BAPTIST CHURCH IS LOCATED TO THE
20:08:58 NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE OF MANHATTAN AND NORTH B.
20:09:01 YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES DOWN ON KENNEDY
20:09:02 BOULEVARD.
20:09:04 AND THEN ABOUT THREE BLOCKS TO THE NORTH IS THE
20:09:07 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY.
20:09:11 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:09:16 IF YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE
20:09:20 PROPERTIES BEEN THAT DARKER BROWN ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL
20:09:20 35.
20:09:24 THEN TO THE NORTH AS WE MOVE CLOSER TO THE HIGHWAY, THE
20:09:29 LIGHTER BROWN IS A RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE
20:09:29 CATEGORY.
20:09:36 ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THAT IS URBAN MIXED USE-60.
20:09:40 TO THE EAST NORTH LOIS, THE SENSE TEE GOES DOWN TO THE
20:09:41 RESIDENTIAL-10.
20:09:44 THAT IS REPRESENTED BY THE TAN.
20:09:47 AND LARGER LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL IS
20:09:51 LOCATED TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF KENNEDY IN THE YELLOW THAT
20:09:55 REPRESENTS THE RESIDENTIAL-6 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:09:56 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DID FIND THAT THE REQUEST
20:10:00 WOULD ALLOW FOR COMPATIBLE REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN A
20:10:07 PLANNED AREA OF THE CITY WHERE WE ARE EXPECTING
20:10:12 DEVELOPMENT MAXIMUM OF 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
20:10:17 AND ALLOW FOR REDEVELOPMENT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
20:10:21 DWELLING UNITS AT AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 20.62 DWELLING
20:10:24 UNITS PER ACRE CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD
20:10:29 DENSITY AND BELOW THE RESIDENTIAL 35 MAXIMUM DENSITY
20:10:30 THAT IS PERMITTED.
20:10:34 THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WOULD REDEVELOP WITHIN THE
20:10:38 EXISTING THREE BLOCK AND LOT CONFIGURATION OF THAT
20:10:40 PORTION OF THE WEST SHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:10:46 THE WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT IS PROXIMATE IT TO
20:10:51 EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT AND TWO THAT INCREASE HOUSING
20:10:52 OPPORTUNITIES NEAR.
20:10:56 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES ENCOURAGE INFILL
20:10:56 DEVELOPMENT.
20:11:01 AND THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDER UTILIZED AND WOULD
20:11:05 MEET THE POLICY DIRECTION BOTH IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT
20:11:09 AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE PORTION OF THE PLAN.
20:11:14 THE CITY OF TAMPA DOES ENCOURAGE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
20:11:17 -- ATTACHED, EXCUSE ME, AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO
20:11:21 BE DESIGNED WITH ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOORS TO THE
20:11:22 STREET.
20:11:29 WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT OF UNIT FOUR TO ENSURE
20:11:33 THAT THE SIDEWALK DOES CONNECT WITH N. HUBERT AVENUE
20:11:37 AND OVERALL THE PROPOSED PD SUPPORTS THE MIXED USE
20:11:40 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
20:11:44 AND WOULD NOT ALTER THIS PORTION OF THE WEST SHORE
20:11:44 PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:11:47 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:11:50 STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED
20:11:52 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:11:56 PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
20:11:57 PLAN.
20:11:59 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
20:12:03 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
20:12:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:12:08 NEXT UP, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT I BELIEVE LIVE OR
20:12:09 REGISTERED TO SPEAK.
20:12:10 MR. MICHELINI.
20:12:13 >>LACHONE DOCK: MR. CHAIRMAN, I APOLOGIZE.
20:12:15 IF I MAY PRESENT.
20:12:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
20:12:18 >>LACHONE DOCK: LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT
20:12:19 COORDINATION.
20:12:21 IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:12:23 CAN YOU SEE MY SLIDE?
20:12:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:12:26 >>LACHONE DOCK: SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO
20:12:30 REZONE THE PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY
20:12:33 ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS.
20:12:34 JUST ONE SECOND.
20:12:37 I AM TRYING TO CHANGE THE MODE OF IT.
20:12:38 THERE WE GO.
20:12:42 TO CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING
20:12:42 UNITS.
20:12:46 THE ONE -- THE .19-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
20:12:50 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST NORTH B STREET AND N. HUBERT
20:12:51 AVENUE.
20:12:54 THE PROPERTY SURROUNDED AS DAVID SHOWED IN HIS MAP BY
20:12:59 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH IN THE RS-50
20:13:01 ZONING DISTRICT.
20:13:04 SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO THE SOUTH IN THE RS-50.
20:13:10 AND RM-24 ZONING DISTRICTS AND MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE
20:13:14 EAST IN THE RM-18 ZONING DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL
20:13:18 MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE WEST IN THE RM-20 ZONING
20:13:19 DISTRICT.
20:13:22 THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED FOR ONE THREE-STORY
20:13:25 TOWNHOUSE-STYLE BUILDING WITH A TOTAL OF FOUR DWELLING
20:13:26 UNITS.
20:13:29 EACH UNIT WILL CONTAIN A TWO-CAR GARAGE.
20:13:33 THE PROPOSED SETBACKS TO THE NORTH, 18 FEET.
20:13:34 SOUTH, 10 FEET.
20:13:35 EAST, 12 FEET.
20:13:40 AND WEST IS 9 FEET PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 40 FEET.
20:13:44 A TOTAL OF NINE PARKING SPACES INCLUDING THE GUEST
20:13:49 SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 16 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED
20:13:51 THROUGH THE COMBINATION OF THE GARAGES AND THE SURFACE
20:13:53 PARKING.
20:13:56 AND HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
20:14:00 THE SITE IS IDENTIFIED BY THIS DOTTED RED LINE.
20:14:06 THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED WITH NORTH B. TO ORIENT YOU ON
20:14:09 THE MAP, WEST NORTH B. TO THE WEST OF THE SITE.
20:14:12 HUBERT AVENUE TO THE EAST OF THE SITE AND YOU CAN SEE
20:14:15 THE SPLIT ZONING, THE WEST PORTION OF THE SITE IS THE
20:14:16 RM-24 ZONING.
20:14:21 AND THEN THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE HAS THE
20:14:24 SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING.
20:14:27 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
20:14:33 SO THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED ON NORTH B. STREET AND THEN
20:14:37 THIS IS HUBERT AVENUE TO THE EAST OF THE SITE.
20:14:41 YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE NORTH PROPOSED AND
20:14:45 THESE ARE THE FOUR UNITS THAT ARE PROPOSED OR
20:14:48 DEVELOPMENT IN THE STRUCTURE.
20:14:51 THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED.
20:14:54 THIS IS THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
20:14:57 AND THEN THE EAST AND THE WEST ELEVATION ARE LOCATED ON
20:15:01 THE BOTTOM.
20:15:05 HERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA.
20:15:08 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE PICTURE OF THE SITE ON
20:15:10 HUBERT AVENUE.
20:15:16 ON THE RIGHT, THIS IS A PICTURE NORTH OF THE SITE.
20:15:18 ON THE LEFT IS EAST OF THE SITE.
20:15:23 AND THEN ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE, MULTIFAMILY.
20:15:27 AND THEN THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
20:15:29 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
20:15:35 REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE PETITION
20:15:35 CONSISTENT.
20:15:40 SHOULD IT BE APPROVAL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
20:15:45 FURTHER MODIFICATIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:15:46 THIS CON CLOUDS MY PRESENTATION.
20:15:48 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:15:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS.
20:15:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A QUICK ONE, MR. CHAIR.
20:15:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
20:15:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
20:16:00 LACHONE, IN REGARD TO -- ONE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT IS
20:16:02 ADJACENT TO THIS.
20:16:05 EVERYTHING ELSE IS ALREADY MULTIFAMILY -- OR WAS
20:16:07 MULTIFAMILY AND WHAT HAVE YOU.
20:16:08 IS THAT CORRECT?
20:16:09 >>LACHONE DOCK: CORRECT.
20:16:12 ARE YOU REFERRING TO SOUTH OF THAT SITE?
20:16:14 IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN.
20:16:17 I APOLOGIZE, I CAN BRING UP THE AERIAL.
20:16:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU WANT TO GO BACK TO THE
20:16:21 AERIAL OR WHAT HAVE YOU.
20:16:24 THE ONLY CONCERN I HAVE WHEN I WAS LOOKING AT THIS --
20:16:29 AT THE -- THE PD AS PROPOSED IS THEY ARE ASKING FOR --
20:16:34 WHAT -- THEY ARE ASKING 40 OR 45 FEET TALL?
20:16:36 >>LACHONE DOCK: 45 FOR THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT.
20:16:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT.
20:16:44 AND IT CONCERNED ME A LITTLE BIT -- LET'S SEE.
20:16:46 >>LACHONE DOCK: THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 40 FEET.
20:16:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT CONCERNED ME A LITTLE BIT AS
20:16:55 COMPARED TO, YOU KNOW, THE TRADITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY
20:16:55 HOME.
20:16:57 I THINK YOU SHOWED US A PICTURE.
20:16:59 JUST A LITTLE ONE-STORY HOME.
20:17:03 I RECOGNIZE MAYBE THAT ONE-STORY HOME IS NOT GOING TO
20:17:05 EXIST THAT MUCH LONGER ESPECIALLY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD,
20:17:08 BECAUSE THAT NEIGHBORHOOD HAS UNDERGONE A LOT OF
20:17:11 TRANSITION, BUT IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS LOOK AT
20:17:16 IN TERMS OF COMPATIBILITY WHEN YOU -- WHEN YOU ARE
20:17:18 EVALUATING THIS?
20:17:22 >> YES, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, WE CERTAINLY DO.
20:17:26 WE LOOK AT PROPERTIES ADJACENT AS WELL -- WE TOOK THAT
20:17:28 INTO CONSIDERATION AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST
20:17:38 AND SURROUNDING THE SITE DINGFELDER OKAY
20:17:42 .I REALIZE IT IS FIVE FEET TALLER THAN THE POSSIBLE
20:17:43 SINGLE-FAMILY THAT WOULD BE NEXT TO IT.
20:17:46 BECAUSE SINGLE-FAMILY, WE ALLOW 35 FEET, RIGHT?
20:17:49 >>LACHONE DOCK: CORRECT, 35 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
20:17:50 ALLOWED.
20:17:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
20:17:53 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
20:17:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:17:57 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
20:17:58 HEARING NONE?
20:18:02 MR. MICHELINI.
20:18:04 WERE YOU -- YES, WE SWORN IN EVERYBODY ON THE SECOND
20:18:05 FLOOR.
20:18:05 >> YES, SIR.
20:18:08 I WAS SWORN IN EARLIER.
20:18:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
20:18:12 >> THANK YOU FOR LETTING US BRING THIS TO YOU.
20:18:14 AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, BOTH THE PLANNING
20:18:18 COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT.
20:18:23 AS YOU KNOW, ACCORDING TO THE REPORT, THERE IS A MIX OF
20:18:27 TOWN HOUSES AND MULTIFAMILY AND THE AREA ITSELF IS IN
20:18:29 TRANSITION FOR BEING REDEVELOPED.
20:18:34 WE ARE PROPOSING FOUR UNITS ON A .19-ACRE SITE.
20:18:41 AND THIS HAS A LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A RES-35 WHICH
20:18:44 IS A FAIRLY INTENSE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:18:47 WE ARE PROPOSING TO BUILD AT 20 DEVELOPMENT UNITS TO
20:18:50 THE ACRE WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH -- WITH THE
20:18:54 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WHERE THE TOWNHOUSES,
20:18:56 THE APARTMENT COMPLEXES, ETC.
20:18:57 THAT ARE AROUND THERE.
20:19:01 YOU WILL ALSO NOTICE THAT WE ARE PROVIDING 16 PARKING
20:19:03 SPACES WHERE NINE IS REQUIRED.
20:19:05 TYPICALLY WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO PROVIDE
20:19:11 ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR GUESTS AND THAT SORT OF THING,
20:19:14 BUT IN THIS CASE, WE DECIDED TO PUT IN ADDITIONAL
20:19:18 PARKING, INCLUDING THE TWO-CAR GARAGES PLUS THE VISITOR
20:19:23 PARKING AND THE PARKING SPACES IN THE DRIVE AISLE
20:19:26 BEHIND THE GARAGE.
20:19:28 WE ARE COMMITTING TO THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE
20:19:31 REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF.
20:19:39 IF YOU RECALL,ON THE CONDITIONS FOR THE -- FOR THE AUTO
20:19:43 STORAGE, THE PROPOSED FOUR UNITS, THE DWELLING UNITS,
20:19:46 ALL WERE FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT, AND WHEN THE STAFF
20:19:51 REVIEWED THIS FOR DESIGN CONSISTENCY WHICH IS PART OF
20:19:54 THE REVIEW, THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WAS
20:19:58 COMPLEMENTARY TO THE AREA AND POINT NUMBER 8 IN THE
20:20:00 STAFF REPORT, POTENTIAL REUSE OF THE BUILDING STOCK,
20:20:04 THE DESIGN AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND
20:20:07 THEREFORE IN NEED OF THE WAIVERS; HOWEVER, THE WAIVER
20:20:11 GRANTED IN PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE AS STATED IN 27-136
20:20:12 HAS BEEN MET.
20:20:16 THIS ALSO INVOLVES THE -- TO INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS
20:20:20 OF OTHER WHO ARE ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY AND MIGHT BE
20:20:23 ADVERSELY EFFECTED AND THE STAFF FOUND THEY WOULD NOT
20:20:24 BE.
20:20:29 THE WAIVER IS IN HARMONY AND SERVES THE INTENT AND
20:20:32 PURPOSES AND THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF
20:20:33 TAMPA.
20:20:36 ALLOWING THE WAIVERS WILL ALLOW FOR SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE
20:20:40 BEING DONE CONSIDERING BOTH THE PUBLIC BENEFITS AND
20:20:41 INTENDED USE FOR THIS PROPERTY.
20:20:46 THIS IS A PROPERTY -- A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT HAS BEEN
20:20:49 SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THIS AREA.
20:20:52 IT IS COMBATABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT AND
20:20:56 THE ONE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE THAT THE COUNCILMAN POINTED
20:21:01 OUT MAST LIKELY IS GOING TO BE PHASED OUT AT SOME THIS
20:21:01 POINT.
20:21:05 THIS ENTIRE AREA IS DESIGNATED FOR REDEVELOPMENT.
20:21:08 AND THIS REDEVELOPMENT IS OCCURRING.
20:21:11 THE PLANNING COMMISSION WENT ON TO FIND WE WERE
20:21:15 CONSISTENT IN TERMS OF VARIOUS LAND USE POLICIES.
20:21:22 1.2.8, PROMOTING A RANGE OF USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF
20:21:26 EACH OTHER, COMPACT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
20:21:30 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING CHARACTER, 2.2.1 AND
20:21:33 USE OF RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND MORE
20:21:35 ECONOMICALLY SOUND INFILL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
20:21:38 CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2.
20:21:41 AND ALL EXIST FOR FUTURE LAND DEVELOPMENTS.
20:21:42 I CAN GO THROUGH THEM.
20:21:45 BUT IT IS IN YOUR REPORT.
20:21:48 8.14.1.
20:21:49 LAND USE 9.2.
20:21:52 9.2.1.
20:21:57 9.2 ENCOURAGED SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ORIENTATION
20:21:59 THAT -- WHICH WE HAVE DONE THAT.
20:22:02 THE DOORS ARE ORIENTED TO THE FRONT AND COMPATIBLE AND
20:22:05 REDEVELOPMENT TO SUSTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS.
20:22:08 THIS IS A STABILIZATION PROJECT WHICH WILL GO A LONG
20:22:11 WAY TOWARD ASSISTING THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN BEING
20:22:15 REBUILT, REVITALIZE AND ALSO END UP PAYING FOR THE
20:22:19 ADDITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY, WATER, SEWER,
20:22:21 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS.
20:22:23 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
20:22:25 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:22:30 AGAIN, THIS IS A REZONING REQUEST GOING FROM RS-50 AND
20:22:34 MULTIFAMILY RM-24 TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A
20:22:39 DENSITY OF 20 DEVELOPMENT UNITS TO THE ACRE WHEN THE
20:22:42 LAND USE DESIGNATION IS 35.
20:22:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
20:22:45 HEARING NONE.
20:22:48 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM
20:22:53 NUMBER 2?
20:22:56 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK?
20:23:01 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
20:23:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND.
20:23:04 ALL IN FAVOR.
20:23:08 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER
20:23:09 2.
20:23:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:23:13 I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH.
20:23:17 FILE NO. REZ-21-09 FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE REZONING
20:23:21 PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 210 N. HUBERT
20:23:24 AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
20:23:26 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
20:23:30 CLASSIFICATION RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
20:23:34 RM-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED
20:23:37 DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
20:23:39 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:23:42 AND LET ME SAY THAT IT IS CONSISTENT.
20:23:47 AND THAT THE ADOPTION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:23:55 REPORT THE COMPLIANCE WITH BOTH THE CITY AND COUNTY
20:23:56 COMMISSION -- THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY REPORT REGARDING
20:24:01 THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECT
20:24:06 SIEVE 9.2 WHICH IS INTENDED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE AMOUNT
20:24:08 OF LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES TO ACCOMMODATE THE
20:24:12 PROJECTED POPULATION, ALSO THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE
20:24:14 DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY APPLICABLE
20:24:20 UNDER THE FUTURE USE PURSUANT TO THE LAND USE POLICY
20:24:22 8.14.1.
20:24:27 THE APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY 2.1.2.
20:24:30 AND HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4.
20:24:35 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW DEVELOPMENT IN VACANT OR
20:24:37 UNDERUTILIZED LAND.
20:24:41 SECTION 27-136 PURPOSE OF SITE TO CONTROL DISTRICTS
20:24:44 SUCH AS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAVE SHOWN THAT THE SITE
20:24:47 PLAN PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
20:24:48 APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY
20:24:51 WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:24:55 PROPOSES -- PROMOTES AN EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE
20:24:58 OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND MEETS ALL THE
20:25:01 REQUIREMENTS TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
20:25:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND.
20:25:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
20:25:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
20:25:08 ROLL CALL VOTE.
20:25:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:25:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:25:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:25:14 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:25:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:25:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:25:18 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:25:22 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
20:25:24 SECOND READING,MAY 6 AT 9:30.
20:25:25 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
20:25:29 ALSO FOR THE RECORD, WE ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING THE
20:25:31 REVISIONS REQUESTED BY STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:25:32 READINGS.
20:25:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:25:36 ITEM NUMBER 3.
20:25:39 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL, LACHONE DOCK,
20:25:40 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:25:45 COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 3 FILE NO. REZ-21-10 FOR THE
20:25:50 PROPERTY LOCATED 602 W. WARREN AVENUE AND 601 W. EUCLID
20:25:50 AVENUE.
20:25:59 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM RM-18 RESIDENTIAL
20:26:05 MULTIFAMILY -- RM-16, I AM SORRY FOR PD FOR RESIDENTIAL
20:26:07 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT.
20:26:09 I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
20:26:13 REPORT AND THEN RETURN IT TO ME TO CONTINUE MY REPORT.
20:26:13 THANK YOU.
20:26:16 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR
20:26:16 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:26:19 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:26:22 HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN.
20:26:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
20:26:25 GO AHEAD, SIR.
20:26:25 >>DAVID HEY: ALL RIGHT.
20:26:29 WE ARE MOVING OVER TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
20:26:33 DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
20:26:34 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:26:39 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE TAMPA
20:26:40 HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
20:26:43 THAT IS THE COLD COLOR HERE ON THIS MAP.
20:26:48 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS PHILLIPS PARK
20:26:53 WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 2/10 OF A MILE TO THE WEST OF
20:26:54 THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:26:57 CLOSEST TRANSIT SPOT IS 400 FEET TO THE WEST IN THE
20:27:01 CORNER OF NORTH BOULEVARD AND W. WARREN BY HART ROUTE 7
20:27:06 THAT CONNECTS DOWNTOWN, WEST TAMPA AND THE HILLSBOROUGH
20:27:08 COMMUNITY COLLEGE DALE MABRY CAMPUS.
20:27:14 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL D EVACUATIONS.
20:27:18 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:27:23 I HAVE GOT WOODROW AVENUE -- FORGOT THE NAME, WOODROW
20:27:25 RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH.
20:27:29 WARREN ON THE NORTH RUNNING EAST-WEST.
20:27:33 YOU CAN SEE THERE IS A MIXTURE OF SOME DUPLEXES, MOSTLY
20:27:37 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN THIS AREA.
20:27:41 THIS VACANT LOT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AND
20:27:45 NORTH BOULEVARD, MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU.
20:27:47 IT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED FOR TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENTS
20:27:50 RIGHT HERE.
20:27:54 TO THE EAST IS THE VILLA MADONNA SCHOOL.
20:27:58 AND ALSO WE HAVE GRAHAM ELEMENTARY IN THE NORTHEAST OF
20:27:59 THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:28:02 THERE ARE SOME COMMERCIAL USES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF
20:28:07 NORTH BOULEVARD AND COLUMBUS DRIVE.
20:28:10 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:28:13 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES
20:28:16 SURROUNDING IT IN THAT BROWN ARE THE RESIDENTIAL 20
20:28:19 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:28:23 TO THE SOUTH AROUND THAT COMMERCIAL NODE THAT WE SAW IN
20:28:26 THE AERIAL REPRESENTED BY THE PINK IS THE COMMUNITY
20:28:27 MIXED USE 35.
20:28:31 THEN AS YOU CONTINUE MOVING SOUTH IN THIS PORTION OF
20:28:35 TAMPA HEIGHTS, THE DENSITY INCREASES TO A RESIDENTIAL
20:28:38 35 IN THIS DARK -- DARKER BROWN.
20:28:42 SO THE WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD, IT MOST -- AND TO THE
20:28:47 NORTH OF WEST PLAZA PLACE, IF REMAINS RESIDENTIAL-10,
20:28:52 WHICH WILL REMAIN PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
20:28:54 IN THE FUTURE.
20:28:57 WHOOPS.
20:29:05 I -- THE -- THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA IS DEVELOPED
20:29:10 WITH THAT PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED WITH
20:29:13 SOME DUPLEXES UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
20:29:20 THIS AREA HAS BUILT ENVIRONMENT RIGHT NOW AS A 5.35
20:29:24 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS THE OVERALL DENSITY.
20:29:28 THE APPLICANT IS UTILIZING THE DENSITY BONUS UNDER THE
20:29:32 RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:29:36 THIS PROPOSED PD WILL BE DEVELOPED OUT AT 20 UNITS PER
20:29:36 ACRE.
20:29:39 THIS IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS THAT COULD
20:29:41 BE CONSIDERED ON THIS SUBJECT SITE.
20:29:45 THE PROPOSED DENSITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT LONG-RANGE
20:29:48 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL
20:29:48 20.
20:29:53 THE PROPOSED PD FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES,
20:29:57 ATTACHED DWELLINGS ORIENTED TOWARD NORTH WOODROW
20:30:01 AVENUE.
20:30:05 AND OFF OF WOODROW AVENUE AND FRONT DOORS ARE ORIENTED
20:30:07 TOWARD WOODROW AVENUE.
20:30:10 THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT BUILDINGS
20:30:14 IN URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT OVERALL
20:30:17 SETBACK FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY.
20:30:21 LASTLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES A DEVELOPMENT
20:30:27 PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT FORM STRATEGY WITH
20:30:29 INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT
20:30:30 OPPORTUNITIES.
20:30:34 AND OVERALL, THE PD WOULD PROVIDE A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
20:30:37 THAT WOULD BE COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
20:30:40 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND IS ALSO CONSISTENT
20:30:42 WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL 20.
20:30:45 SO, THEREFORE, TONIGHT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
20:30:47 IS RECOMMENDING TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE -- THAT
20:30:50 THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH
20:30:54 THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
20:30:55 PLAN.
20:30:58 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE IF
20:31:00 YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
20:31:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS.
20:31:03 LACHONE.
20:31:06 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL.
20:31:08 LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:31:12 LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN AND POWERPOINT.
20:31:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD.
20:31:16 >>LACHONE DOCK: OKAY, THANK YOU.
20:31:18 FOR THIS COUNCIL, THREE WAIVERS REQUESTED.
20:31:21 ONE IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM 14 TO
20:31:21 12.
20:31:26 THE OTHER ALLOW THE REDUCTION IN DRIVE AISLE FROM 20
20:31:27 FEET TO 14.8.
20:31:37 AND LAST WAIVER TO THE UVA BUFFER TO THE EAST AT THREE
20:31:42 FEET AND ELIMINATE THE EVERGREEN TREE IN THE LOCATION
20:31:45 GIVEN THE WIDTH THAT WILL BE PROVIDED.
20:31:50 THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT SIX
20:31:52 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS.
20:32:00 THE .3 ACRE IS LOCATED ON NORTH WOODROW AVENUE.
20:32:03 THE PROJECT IS SURROUNDED WITH SINGLE RESIDENTIAL USES
20:32:06 OF THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL
20:32:12 MULTIFAMILY 16 ZONING DISTRICT AND MULTIFAMILY AND
20:32:16 RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE WEST IN THE RM-16 DISTRICT.
20:32:19 THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED FOR ONE THREE-STORY
20:32:22 TOWNHOUSE-STYLE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH A TOTAL OF
20:32:23 SIX DWELLING UNITS.
20:32:27 EACH UNIT WILL CONTAIN A TWO-CAR GARAGE.
20:32:30 THE PROPOSED SETBACK 13 FEET.
20:32:31 SOUTH IS 13 FEET.
20:32:35 TO THE EAST IS 9 FEET AND TO THE WEST IS 16 FEET.
20:32:39 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36 FEET.
20:32:42 14 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED AND 12 SPACES ARE
20:32:43 PROVIDED.
20:32:46 VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THIS SITE IS PROPOSED WITH ONE WAY
20:32:51 ACCESS ON W. WARREN AVENUE, AND WOULD EXIT ON TO W.
20:32:56 EUCLID AVENUE, AND I WILL SHOW THAT ON THE SITE PLAN
20:32:57 PROVIDED.
20:33:00 THE PROPERTY HAD THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF
20:33:03 R-20 AS DAVID HAS PROVIDED FOR YOU.
20:33:07 ALLOW FOR THE DENSITY OF 18 DWELLING UNION PER ACRE BY
20:33:10 RIGHT OF THE 20 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:33:15 WITH THE ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
20:33:18 THE PROJECT PROPOSAL OF INCREASED DENSITY FROM FIVE
20:33:22 DWELLING UNITS TO SIX DWELLING UNITS PURSUANT TO
20:33:24 27-140.
20:33:29 THE AMOUNT TO ACHIEVE THE INCREMENTAL BONUS DENSITY IS
20:33:33 $24,246.60.
20:33:35 AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED
20:33:40 FOR CONSIDERATION.
20:33:43 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
20:33:47 SO TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS AERIAL, THERE IS NORTH
20:33:47 BOULEVARD.
20:33:48 THIS IS TO THE WEST.
20:33:52 AND THIS IS W. EUCLID TO THE SOUTH -- THE SOUTH
20:33:53 BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY.
20:33:55 THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE RED
20:33:57 DOTTED LINE.
20:34:01 AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE -- THE PROPERTY USE HAS THE
20:34:04 MIXTURE OF THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
20:34:09 MULTIFAMILY SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY.
20:34:12 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED.
20:34:15 I THINK THERE IS ALSO ANOTHER ONE WITH A CLOSE-UP.
20:34:17 BUT THIS IS THE SITE.
20:34:19 THESE ARE THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE -- THIS IS THE
20:34:24 BUILDING PROPOSED WITH THE VEHICULAR ACCESS PROPOSED TO
20:34:28 THE NORTH WITH THE ONE-WAY TRAFFIC.
20:34:32 TRAVEL TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE AND THESE ARE THE SIX
20:34:34 LOTS PROPOSED.
20:34:43 THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED.
20:34:48 PICTURES OF THE SITE IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
20:34:51 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
20:34:57 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
20:35:00 THIS IS IF YOU START ON NORTH BOULEVARD AND HEAD TO THE
20:35:00 SITE.
20:35:04 THE SITE LOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN.
20:35:07 TO THE RIGHT OF THIS SITE HERE.
20:35:10 THIS IS A PICTURE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SOUTH END OF
20:35:12 THE SITE ON EUCLID.
20:35:18 THIS IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE ON WOODROW.
20:35:21 SO THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE.
20:35:22 ANOTHER VIEW.
20:35:25 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE
20:35:29 ON WARREN AVENUE LOOKING AT THE SITE.
20:35:32 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS EAST OF THE SITE ON THE
20:35:35 NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AND WOODROW.
20:35:39 AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
20:35:42 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTH OF THE SITE ALSO.
20:35:46 THAT IS THE VIEW THAT IS LOOKING WEST ON WARREN AVENUE
20:35:47 TOWARD BOULEVARD.
20:35:50 AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE
20:35:52 ON WARREN AVENUE.
20:35:56 THEN WE SWING BACK AROUND SOUTH OF THE SITE.
20:36:00 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EUCLID AND WOODROW AND SOUTH OF
20:36:03 THE SITE, THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT.
20:36:05 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
20:36:10 REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST
20:36:12 INCONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE.
20:36:17 PLEASE SEE THE FINDINGS OF THE INCONSISTENT FINDING
20:36:18 PROVIDED ON THE STAFF REPORT.
20:36:22 IF IT IS THE POSITION OF THE CITY DOWN APPROVE THE
20:36:26 APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN ARE
20:36:28 REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:36:31 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
20:36:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:36:33 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:36:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:36:40 MISS DOCK, WHAT -- I THINK IT IS APPROXIMATELY $24,000
20:36:44 ACCUMULATED FOR THE DENSITY BONUS.
20:36:49 AND I AM SORRY IF I MISSED IT IF YOU SAID IT, BUT
20:36:53 USUALLY THAT IS TARGETED TO A SPECIFIC PROJECT NEARBY
20:36:54 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
20:36:58 IS THERE A PROJECT FOR THAT?
20:37:00 MISS WELLS, I SEE YOUR HAND.
20:37:01 >>CATE WELLS: THIS IS CATE WELLS.
20:37:05 A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IN THE MATERIALS AND THE
20:37:09 AMOUNT OF THE BONUS PAYMENT WOULD BE APPLIED BY THE
20:37:13 APPLICANT TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IMMEDIATELY WITHIN
20:37:16 THE DEVELOPMENT.
20:37:20 AND ATTACHED TO THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IS AN
20:37:22 EXHIBIT C WHICH DEPICTS THE LOCATION OF THE
20:37:25 UNDERGROUNDING OF THE UTILITIES.
20:37:30 I DON'T KNOW IF PERHAPS IN HIS PRESENTATION MIGHT SHOW
20:37:31 THAT.
20:37:34 I DON'T KNOW IF HE IS PREPARED TO DO THAT TONIGHT.
20:37:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THAT IS A NOVEL -- A NEWER ONE
20:37:40 IN THIS TYPE OF SORT OF SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT.
20:37:44 I KNOW WE UNDERGROUND IN CHANNELSIDE AS A CRA AND
20:37:49 UNDERGROUNDING AS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE IS GOOD, BUT WHY
20:37:54 DOES THAT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY AS OPPOSED OF
20:37:56 BENEFITING A PARTICULAR DEVELOPER.
20:38:00 >>CATE WELLS: SECTION 27-140 OF YOUR CODE CONTEMPLATES
20:38:04 THE UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES AS -- AS AN ACTIVITY
20:38:08 THAT WOULD GO TOWARD THE ABILITY TO INCREASE THE
20:38:11 DENSITY.
20:38:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, SO -- SO THAT IS ONE OF THE
20:38:19 LISTED OPPORTUNITIES EXPRESSLY LISTED IN OUR CODE
20:38:19 ALREADY?
20:38:24 >>CATE WELLS: THAT'S CORRECT.
20:38:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MISS DOCK, IF YOU HAVE ANY INPUT ON
20:38:28 THIS.
20:38:33 I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND, AGAIN, WHY THAT IS A BENEFIT
20:38:36 TO -- I AM NOT TRYING TO BE CRITICAL.
20:38:38 IF IT IS IN THE CODE, IT'S IN THE CODE.
20:38:42 BUT I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW UNDERGROUNDING HIS OWN
20:38:44 UTILITIES IS BENEFICIAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE
20:38:46 SURROUNDING AREA.
20:38:49 I THOUGHT THESE BONUS FEES WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO
20:38:54 TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS OR BICYCLE PATHS AND THINGS
20:38:57 LIKE THAT THAT MAY HELP MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE
20:38:59 PROJECT ON THE COMMUNITY.
20:39:02 >>LACHONE DOCK: SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE IN THE CODE THE
20:39:05 LIST OF CRITERIA.
20:39:09 THE LIST OF ITEMS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A BONUS --
20:39:12 AS A BONUS PROVIDED.
20:39:15 AND THIS IS ONE OF THE ITEM.
20:39:17 THERE ARE SEVERAL THINGS THAT ARE LISTED.
20:39:21 SO NOT ONLY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT THAT WILL BE
20:39:24 APPLIED TO THAT PLANS AREA.
20:39:26 THE FUNDS WOULD BE APPLIED TO A PROJECT WITHIN THAT
20:39:29 PLANNING AREA THAT MIGHT BE TYPICALLY WHAT YOU MIGHT
20:39:34 HEAR AND OTHER OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO AN APPLICANT.
20:39:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:39:37 THANK YOU, STAFF.
20:39:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:39:41 WHO IS THE APPLICANT PRESENTING.
20:39:45 IS IT MR. MILFORD?
20:39:46 YOU ARE MUTED, SIR.
20:39:50 >> YES, CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
20:39:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND
20:39:53 IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK.
20:39:58 WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.
20:40:01 >>CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE
20:40:03 TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
20:40:04 >> I DO.
20:40:07 >>CLERK: FOR THE RECORD, THE CLERK DID RECEIVE WRITTEN
20:40:08 COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.
20:40:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:40:11 GO AHEAD, SIR.
20:40:11 >> OKAY.
20:40:14 I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME TONIGHT.
20:40:18 THE PROJECT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WILL REPLACE SEVEN
20:40:21 APARTMENT UNITS WITH SIX TOWNHOME UNITS.
20:40:25 AS WAS JUST MENTIONED, WE ARE REQUESTING A BONUS
20:40:25 PROVISION.
20:40:28 AND I WILL TALK MORE ABOUT THE UTILITIES IN JUST A
20:40:31 MINUTE.
20:40:35 BUT WITH THE -- WITH THE DENSITY CALCULATION ALLOWED
20:40:38 WITHOUT THE BONUS PROVISION WOULD ACTUALLY -- THE MATH
20:40:42 COMES OUT TO 5.4 UNITS, WHICH WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO
20:40:43 ROUND DOWN TO FIVE.
20:40:48 THIS IS JUST ALLOWING TO ROUND UP TO SIX.
20:40:52 AND SO -- AND AS STAFF HAS ALREADY INDICATED ONE OF THE
20:40:56 ALLOWANCES WITHIN THE CODE IS TO PLACE UTILITIES
20:41:01 UNDERGROUND AS ONE OF THE WAYS TO MITIGATE.
20:41:06 AND, OF COURSE, THESE ARE TAMPA ELECTRIC AND FRONTIER
20:41:12 AND CABLE UTILITIES THAT SURROUND THE PROPERTY ON THREE
20:41:15 FRONTAGES ON POLES.
20:41:16 AND THOSE WOULD GO UNDERGROUND.
20:41:20 WE DON'T HAVE PRICES YET ON THESE AND THE WAY THE BONUS
20:41:23 PROVISION IS WRITTEN, IF THE COST OF PUTTING THOSE
20:41:27 UNDER GROUND DO TO THE COME UP TO THE FULL $24,000,
20:41:32 THEN WE WILL WORK WITH CITY STAFF WHO EITHER PROVIDE
20:41:37 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS AROUND THE PROPERTY OR TO WRITE A
20:41:40 CHECK TO THE CITY FOR THE CITY TO USE THAT MONEY ON A
20:41:43 NEARBY PROJECT.
20:41:47 SO ANYWAY, I WANTED TO TALK -- WE CAN ANSWER MORE
20:41:49 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BONUS PROVISION IF NEEDED.
20:41:53 I WANTED TO TALK FOR A MINUTE ABOUT THE WAIVERS.
20:41:57 I WON'T TAKE TOO MUCH LONGER BECAUSE STAFF HAS DONE A
20:42:01 GOOD JOB WITH THIS PRESENTATION TONIGHT.
20:42:05 BUT ONE OF THE WAIVERS, WE ARE REQUESTING A REDUCTION
20:42:11 IN REQUIRED PARKING INSTEAD OF 14 SPACES, WE ARE GOING
20:42:13 TO HAVE 12.
20:42:16 WE HAVE ADDED AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH END OF THE
20:42:19 BUILDING BICYCLE MOUNTS AND WHILE IN OTHER AREAS OF THE
20:42:22 CITY, I UNDERSTAND THE BICYCLE MOUNTS WOULD
20:42:26 AUTOMATICALLY COUNT TOWARD PARKING.
20:42:31 THEY DO NOT IN OUR CASE, BUT WE ARE PROVIDING THOSE TO
20:42:37 OFFSET THAT REDUCTION A LITTLE BIT.
20:42:39 BUT RIGHT NOW WITH THE SEVEN APARTMENT UNITS OUT THERE
20:42:43 OR WERE RECENTLY OUT THERE AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PHOTOS
20:42:44 THAT WERE SHOWN.
20:42:48 THEY HAVE RECENTLY BEEN DEMOLISHED, BUT THERE WAS LESS
20:42:52 ON-SITE PARKING FOR THOSE SEVEN UNITS THAN WE WILL HAVE
20:42:54 FOR THE SIXTH.
20:42:57 THE SECOND WAIVER HAS TO DO WITH SPECIFICALLY THE WIDTH
20:42:59 OF THE DRIVE AISLE.
20:43:03 AND THAT IS, YOU KNOW, A SUBSTANTIAL DECREASE WE ARE
20:43:08 REQUESTING FROM 24 FEET TO JUST UNDER 15 FEET; HOWEVER,
20:43:11 I WANT TO POINT THIS OUT, THAT NOT JUST THE DRIVE AISLE
20:43:16 BUT FROM THE WEST END OF OUR DRIVE AISLE, THE -- THE
20:43:19 END FARTHEST AWAY FROM THE GARAGES.
20:43:23 THE FAR END OF THE GARAGES IS 42 FEET.
20:43:27 WHICH NORMAL REQUIRED PARKING IS 24-FOOT DRIVE AISLE
20:43:31 AND 18-FOOT-DEEP PARKING SPACE WHICH IS 42 FEET.
20:43:36 WE HAVE THAT SAME OVERALL.
20:43:45 ALSO WE PROVIDED TO CITY STAFF AS PART OF OUR SUBMITTAL
20:43:50 AND IT IS IN THE FILE AND WE PROVIDED AUTO TURN
20:43:53 MOVEMENTS TO SHOW THAT WE BELIEVE THIS WORKS.
20:44:02 AND THEN LACHONE MENTIONED THE THIRD WAIVER WHICH IS
20:44:07 INCREASING THE BUFFER FROM FIVE FEET TO THREE FEET.
20:44:11 AND WE ARE PER THE PD PLAN INSTALLING A SIX-FOOT-HIGH
20:44:13 OPAQUE FENCE ALONG THAT PROPERTY LINE.
20:44:17 AND I WANT TO JUST MAKE SURE THIS IS IN THE RECORD.
20:44:21 WE HAD A FOURTH WAIVER ON THE PLAN.
20:44:29 AND THIS HAD TO DO WITH INSTALLING WALLED COURTYARDS ON
20:44:37 THE FRONTAGE AND MR. BRIAN SEAL OF THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
20:44:40 CIVIC ASSOCIATION FILED AN OBJECTION TO THE CITY WITH
20:44:43 REGARD TO THAT PARTICULAR WAIVER AND I LET HIM KNOW
20:44:45 TODAY VIA E-MAIL THAT THAT WAIVER WAS BEING REMOVED
20:44:47 FROM THE PLAN.
20:44:52 SO THAT OBJECTION THAT MR. STEELE OF TAMPA HEIGHTS HAD
20:44:57 IS NO LONGER A PART OF OUR -- OUR PROPOSAL.
20:45:00 MR. STEELE NOW KNOWS THAT AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WE
20:45:02 HAVE MADE THAT CHANGE.
20:45:07 OTHER THAN MR. STEELE, OUT OF THE LETTERS THAT WENT
20:45:11 OUT, WE RECEIVED ONE PHONE CALL FROM A LADY MISS DIXON
20:45:15 THAT LIVES A BLOCK NORTH OF THE PROJECT THAT HAD
20:45:16 QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT WE WERE DOING.
20:45:21 AND I WAS NOT ONLY ABLE TO ANSWER HER QUESTIONS, WHICH
20:45:24 SHE THANKED ME FOR, BUT I WAS ABLE TO TELL HER HOW SHE
20:45:28 COULD EITHER PARTICIPATE IN THIS HEARING VIRTUALLY OR
20:45:29 WATCH ON TELEVISION.
20:45:33 SO I DON'T KNOW IF SHE'S ONLINE WITH US.
20:45:36 SO PERHAPS JUST AT HOME WATCHING ON TV.
20:45:39 I HAD A NICE CONVERSATION WITH HER.
20:45:43 I KNOW IT'S BEEN KIND OF A LONG NIGHT ALREADY AND THIS
20:45:50 IS ONLY ITEM, SO I WILL SET ASIDE ANY ADDITIONAL TIME
20:45:54 WE HAVE FOR RESPONSE TO ANY QUESTIONS.
20:46:00 AND I HOPE THAT OUR RESPONSES REGARDING THESE WAIVERS
20:46:06 WILL SATISFY THE INCONSISTENCY REGARDING THE
20:46:07 TRANSPORTATION REVIEW.
20:46:10 I BELIEVE ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS FOUND THE PROJECT
20:46:13 CONSISTENT, AND WE WILL RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR
20:46:14 APPROVAL TONIGHT.
20:46:14 THANK YOU.
20:46:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:46:20 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
20:46:23 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM
20:46:25 NUMBER 3?
20:46:33 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN PERSON FOR ITEM NUMBER 3?
20:46:41 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND
20:46:44 GROWTH, NO ONE HERE.
20:46:48 >>CLERK: NO ONE REGISTERED.
20:46:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN
20:46:53 CITRO.
20:46:54 ALL IN FAVOR.
20:46:56 WHAT THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL.
20:46:59 I BELIEVE -- WHO READ THE LAST ONE?
20:47:00 CHARLIE DID?
20:47:00 OKAY.
20:47:02 GO DOWN THE ROW.
20:47:13 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
20:47:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE SECOND.
20:47:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEN WE HAVE A RESOLUTION AFTER --
20:47:22 SORRY.
20:47:25 THE RESOLUTION IS TO BE ADOPTED AFTER SECOND READING.
20:47:26 NEVER MIND.
20:47:29 JUST READ THE ORDINANCE THERE DING DINGFELDER OKAY, MR.
20:47:30 CHAIRMAN.
20:47:34 I WILL MOVE THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE, FILE NO.
20:47:37 REZ-21-10.
20:47:41 FOR APPROVAL AND ADOPTION ON FIRST READING.
20:47:44 I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR
20:47:48 COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE EVER CONDITION AS SHOWN
20:47:50 ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
20:47:52 PLAN AND CITY CODE AND I FIND THAT THE REQUESTED
20:47:56 WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY EFFECT OR IMPACT THE PUBLIC
20:48:03 HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE AND SPECIFICALLY I
20:48:06 WILL MOVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
20:48:11 VICINITY OF 602 W. WARREN AVENUE AND 601 W. EUCLID
20:48:14 AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
20:48:16 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
20:48:22 CLASSIFICATIONS RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD,
20:48:24 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
20:48:26 ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:48:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:48:30 MR. DINGFELDER, INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN
20:48:31 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:48:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ABSOLUTELY.
20:48:36 INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:48:38 READING BY THE APPLICANT.
20:48:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
20:48:42 ROLL CALL VOTE PLEASE.
20:48:43 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:48:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:48:47 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.
20:48:49 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:48:50 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:48:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:48:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:48:56 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO.
20:49:01 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION HELD ON MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M.
20:49:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, ITEM NUMBER 4.
20:49:08 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
20:49:10 LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:49:14 ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZ-21-12.
20:49:20 THE PROPERTY LOCATED 404 EAST SEWARD STREET TO REZONE
20:49:27 FROM RS-50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
20:49:28 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
20:49:32 I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND IF
20:49:37 I CAN HAVE IT BACK TO PLEASE COMPLETE MY REPORT.
20:49:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:49:40 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
20:49:43 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:49:45 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:49:48 WE MOVE TO THE UNIVERSITY PLAN DISTRICT FOR THE NEXT
20:49:49 CASE.
20:49:55 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED 400 FEET TO THE SOUTH OF
20:50:00 YUKON TRANSFER CENTER AND SERVED BY SEVERAL PARTS OR
20:50:02 ROUTES THAT CONNECT TO DOWNTOWN, THE UNIVERSITY AREA,
20:50:05 AND ARMENIA AND HOWARD AVENUE.
20:50:08 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN LEVEL E EVACUATION
20:50:15 DEVELOPMENT AS WELL.
20:50:18 THE -- HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:50:21 YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE PARCEL.
20:50:24 ABOUT ONE BLOCK TO THE EAST YOU HAVE INTERSTATE 275.
20:50:31 ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH IS THAT EAST YUKON STREET COMING
20:50:31 THROUGH.
20:50:33 THIS IS HART TRANSFER CENTER.
20:50:39 IN IS THE HOME DEPOT THAT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
20:50:42 OF FLORIDA AND YUKON.
20:50:45 COMMERCIAL USES ALONG THE SECTION OF FLORIDA AVENUE.
20:50:50 THIS AREA IS A POCKET OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
20:50:52 RESIDENTIAL AND TO THE SOUTH, THIS IS A COMMERCIAL
20:50:58 PLAZA FORMALLY YEARS AGO, THE K-MART.
20:51:01 IT IS NOW AN AUTO ZONE.
20:51:04 AND THEN YOU HAVE THE GREYHOUND -- THE OLD GREYHOUND
20:51:09 TRACK TO THE SOUTH.
20:51:11 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL.
20:51:14 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE SURROUNDING PARCELS IN
20:51:17 THIS TAN COLOR ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL-10.
20:51:20 SO THAT AREA IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN SINGLE-FAMILY
20:51:23 DETACHED IN CHARACTER.
20:51:27 TO THE NORTH, THIS PINK COLOR HERE IS -- THAT IS THE
20:51:29 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
20:51:33 AS WE MOVE OUT TO FLORIDA, THE BRIGHT RED AND WHAT YOU
20:51:37 SEE OVER ON NEBRASKA IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35
20:51:42 WHICH HAS THE CI INTENSIVE USES.
20:51:45 AND FURTHER TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE COMMERCIAL PLAZA IS
20:51:48 AND THE GREYHOUND TRACK, THAT IS ACTUALLY URBAN MIXED
20:51:51 USE-60 WITH A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THOSE
20:51:53 PARCELS.
20:51:57 THE DARK BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 35.
20:52:00 AND THEN YOU ACTUALLY HAVE SOME LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ON THE
20:52:06 SOUTH SIDE OF BUSCH BOULEVARD REPRESENTED BY THE GRAY.
20:52:08 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION
20:52:10 AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
20:52:12 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:52:16 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILT PARCELS FACING THE SUBJECT
20:52:23 SITE ALONG NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE HAVE A CURRENT DENSITY
20:52:26 OF 6.9 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:52:30 THE PROPOSED DENSITY FOR THE SUBJECT SITE IF THE PD IS
20:52:34 APPROVED IS 9.09 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:52:37 THESE DENSITIES ARE WITHIN THE RANGE PERMITTED AND
20:52:41 PLANNED FOR UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE
20:52:42 DESIGNATION.
20:52:45 FURTHERMORE THE PROPOSED PD IS SIMILAR IN FORM, HEIGHT
20:52:48 AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES FOUND
20:52:53 ALONG THIS PORTION OF EAST SEWARD STREET.
20:52:56 IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE AND
20:52:59 COMPATIBLE WITH THE FINE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITHIN
20:53:04 THIS PORTION OF THE CITY AND THE PROPOSAL DOES -- IS
20:53:10 CONSISTENT WITH INFILL POLICIES REGARDING RESIDENTIAL
20:53:15 AND ITS PROXIMITY TO EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT AMENITIES.
20:53:17 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:53:20 STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE
20:53:23 PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH
20:53:27 THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:53:28 THANK YOU.
20:53:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, LACHONE.
20:53:33 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL, THANK YOU.
20:53:35 I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:53:39 LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:53:42 CAN YOU SEE MY POWERPOINT?
20:53:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
20:53:47 >>LACHONE DOCK: OKAY, THANK YOU.
20:53:51 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
20:53:53 TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
20:53:57 THE PROPERTY CONTAINED TWO PLATTED LOTS, LOT 11 AND LOT
20:54:00 12 OF BLOCK 2.
20:54:05 THE MINIMUM HEIGHTS AREA OF THE RS ZONING DISTRICT IS
20:54:07 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
20:54:10 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE LOTS AS CONFIGURED TO BE
20:54:13 CONSTRUCTED WITH ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
20:54:15 STRUCTURE ON EACH LOT.
20:54:19 GIVEN THE OVERALL LOT AREA OF 4750 SQUARE FEET FOR EACH
20:54:22 LOT, THE ONLY WAY TO REQUEST TO ESTABLISH EACH LOT IS
20:54:25 THROUGH THE PD PROCESS.
20:54:28 SO THE SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH
20:54:29 SEMINOLE AVENUE.
20:54:35 THE PROPOSED PD SETBACKS FOR LOTS 11 AND 12 ARE TO THE
20:54:37 NORTH AT THE SEVEN FEET.
20:54:38 TO THE SOUTH AT SEVEN FEET.
20:54:39 TO THE EAST 20 FEET.
20:54:41 AND TO THE WEST IS 20 FEET.
20:54:44 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 35 FEET.
20:54:48 AS DAVID HAS SHOWN, THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY
20:54:50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS WHICH ARE
20:54:54 ALL IN THE RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT AND SURROUNDING THE
20:54:55 SITE ON ALL SIDES.
20:54:59 THE TOTAL OF FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR BOTH
20:55:04 LOTS AND FOR PARKING -- AND FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE
20:55:05 PROVIDED.
20:55:09 LOT 11 HAVE VEHICULAR ACCESS.
20:55:14 AND LOT 12 HAVE VEHICULAR ON THE EAST SEWARD AVENUE --
20:55:16 SEWARD STREET WHICH IS THE CORNER.
20:55:19 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
20:55:22 THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED IN RED.
20:55:25 ON THE MAP, AND THIS IS SEMINOLE AVENUE THAT IS
20:55:27 BORDERING THE SITE ON THE WEST.
20:55:30 YOU CAN SEE THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH THE RS-50
20:55:35 ZONING AS DAVID SHOWED EARLIER AND YOU HAVE 275 THAT IS
20:55:38 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE.
20:55:42 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PRO PROVIDED.
20:55:46 THIS IS SEMINOLE AVENUE THAT IS TO THE WEST AND YOU CAN
20:55:50 SEE THAT THESE ARE THE TWO STRUCTURES PROPOSED ON THE
20:55:51 TWO LOTS.
20:55:53 THE TOP ONE IS LOT 11.
20:55:57 AND THE BOTTOM LOT IS LOT 12.
20:56:00 SO YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH
20:56:04 FOR LOT 12 WHILE VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR LOT 11 IS
20:56:05 PROPOSED ON THE WEST.
20:56:10 AND THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED WITH THE SITE FOR
20:56:14 LOT 11 AND FOR LOT 12.
20:56:17 AND THEN THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
20:56:23 SO THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE VIEW OF THE SITE AS
20:56:25 YOU ARE LOOKING EASTWARD.
20:56:31 THIS IS ON THE RIGHT, ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
20:56:34 AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE
20:56:34 SITE.
20:56:37 THIS IS MORE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE SITE.
20:56:41 AND THEN THIS PROPERTY ON THE RIGHT -- THE PICTURE ON
20:56:43 THE RIGHT IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS
20:56:48 LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE.
20:56:51 SO ON THE LEFT, OFF PICTURE OF THE WEST END OF THE
20:56:52 SITE.
20:56:54 THIS IS ON SEMINOLE AVENUE.
20:56:59 AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
20:57:02 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
20:57:05 AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF
20:57:07 THE SITE.
20:57:11 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS LOOKING EAST.
20:57:14 AND YOU CAN SEE THE INTERSTATE IS IN THE BACKGROUND OF
20:57:14 THE PICTURE.
20:57:16 THE ROAD ACTUALLY DEAD-ENDS.
20:57:22 AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE.
20:57:24 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
20:57:27 REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
20:57:31 IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
20:57:35 APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE SITE PLAN ARE
20:57:37 REQUIRED DURING FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:57:40 AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
20:57:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
20:57:43 ALL RIGHT, WE GO TO THE APPLICANT.
20:57:47 YES, SIR, YOU ARE SWORN IN, SO YOU ARE GOOD TO GO.
20:57:51 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
20:57:52 I'M JOHN LAROCA, MURPHY LAROCA CONSULTING,
20:57:53 REPRESENTING THE OWNER AND APPLICANT, DANVA REAL ESTATE.
20:57:54 AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:57:56 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS TO RECOGNIZE TWO
20:58:01 EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD.
20:58:02 LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK TWO OF IRVINGTON SUBDIVISION WERE
20:58:09 PLATTED IN 1912.
20:58:12 109 YEARS AGO.
20:58:13 THESE ARE LOTS OF RECORD THAT ARE 50 FEET WIDE BY 95 FEET
20:58:19 DEEP WITH A 10-FOOT ALLEY IN THE REAR.
20:58:22 AS MS. DOCK INDICATED, THE ONLY WAY THESE TWO LOTS IN THE
20:58:29 RS 50 DISTRICT CAN BE DEVELOPED BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNED IN
20:58:33 COMBINATION WOULD BE THROUGH THE PD ZONING.
20:58:35 THE LOTS ARE PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH INDIVIDUAL
20:58:40 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES MEETING THE RS 50
20:58:45 REGULATIONS.
20:58:45 YOU HAVE THE REPORT WITH YOU AND DAVID HEY GAVE THE
20:58:51 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, AS DID MS. DOCK.
20:58:53 THERE'S NO DISAGREEMENT.
20:58:55 I CONCUR WHOLEHEARTEDLY.
20:58:59 APPLICATION WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH SOME MODIFICATIONS
20:59:03 NECESSARY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:59:06 FOR THE RECORD, THOSE MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN DRAFTED.
20:59:10 THOSE CHANGES WILL BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:59:13 READING, IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
20:59:16 THIS ZONING.
20:59:17 THE PROPERTY IS IN THE GREATER SULPHUR SPRINGS AREA.
20:59:21 THIS IS A CLASSIC CASE OF UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTY IN WHAT
20:59:28 IS A REDEVELOPING NATURE OF MANY OF OUR FORGOTTEN
20:59:34 NEIGHBORHOODS OVER THE YEARS.
20:59:37 AS YOU KNOW ON CITY COUNCIL, WITH MANY OTHER CHANGES
20:59:41 YOU'VE BEEN SEEING OCCUR WITHIN THE CITY, UNDEVELOPED
20:59:45 PROPERTIES ARE BEING REDISCOVERED, AND THERE IS INTEREST
20:59:52 FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY TO REDEVELOP THESE
20:59:55 PROPERTIES AS THEY WERE INTENDED.
20:59:57 WITH THAT SAID, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
21:00:01 I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
21:00:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:00:04 HEARING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS
21:00:07 HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4?
21:00:22 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, THERE'S NOBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS
21:00:26 ITEM.
21:00:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY REGISTERED FOR ITEM 4?
21:00:28 COUNCILMAN VIERA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 4?
21:00:41 >> MR. CHAIR, I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
21:00:43 FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING
21:00:46 PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 404 EAST SEWARD
21:00:50 STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
21:00:53 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
21:00:55 CLASSIFICATION RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD
21:00:58 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,
21:01:02 DETACHED; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:01:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN
21:01:05 GUDES.
21:01:06 ROLL CALL VOTE.
21:01:09 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:01:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:01:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:01:13 >> AND MS. WELLS.
21:01:17 >>CATE WELLS: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE MOTION
21:01:18 INCLUDES THE REVISIONS AS SHOWN ON THE REVISION SHEET
21:01:21 WILL BE INCORPORATED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
21:01:26 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, THE MOTION DOES INCLUDE THAT.
21:01:28 YES.
21:01:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:01:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:01:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:01:34 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:01:36 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT
21:01:39 9:30 A.M.
21:01:40 NEXT UP, ITEM NUMBER 5.
21:01:56 >> HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:01:59 I BELIEVE I NEED TO BE SWORN IN.
21:02:05 [OATH ADMINISTERED]
21:02:10 FOR THE RECORD, THE CLERK'S OFFICE DID RECEIVE WRITTEN
21:02:14 COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
21:02:16 >> ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:02:18 FILE NUMBER 21-14, PROPERTY ADDRESS 9904 NORTH 14th
21:02:25 STREET.
21:02:26 THIS IS FOR A PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL
21:02:31 SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18.
21:02:36 I'LL PASS IT ALONG TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
21:02:39 DAVID.
21:02:50 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
21:02:52 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:02:54 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:02:56 YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE MY SCREEN.
21:02:57 THIS NEXT, WE REMAIN IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT
21:03:07 FOR THIS NEXT REZONING.
21:03:10 THE SUBJECT SITE IS -- THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL
21:03:16 FACILITY, THE DAVID E. WEST PARK, WHICH IS ABOUT .8 MILES
21:03:20 EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:03:23 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE,
21:03:30 AND HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT, HART BUS 45 DOES
21:03:34 SERVE THE SITE.
21:03:35 THE CLOSEST STOP LOCATED JUST ONE-TENTH OF A MILE TO THE
21:03:39 NORTHWEST AT THE CORNER OF NORTH LANTANA AVENUE AND EAST
21:03:43 LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
21:03:45 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL.
21:03:49 YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:03:51 IT'S HARD TO SEE BUT REALLY THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN
21:03:55 THIS AREA, IT'S A MIXTURE OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND
21:04:00 DUPLEXES.
21:04:04 THEN THIS IS LINEBAUGH ABOUT ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH AND
21:04:07 THEN YOU'VE GOT 14th STREET RUNNING DOWN THIS WAY.
21:04:13 THIS IS THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT HEADS NORTH
21:04:17 AND DOWN TO NEAR THE FORT.
21:04:20 AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES TO
21:04:24 THE WEST CENTERED ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:04:28 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:04:33 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES IN THIS BROWN ARE
21:04:37 THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
21:04:40 SO THAT ALLOWS CONSIDERATIONS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
21:04:45 AND ATTACHED DWELLINGS, PREDOMINANTLY TOWNHOMES.
21:04:48 EAST OF NORTH 15th STREET, THE DENSITY DOES DECREASE
21:04:53 DOWN TO A RESIDENTIAL 10, WHICH IS REPRESENTED BY THE
21:04:57 TAN, AND THEN THAT COMMERCIAL THAT WE SAW OUT ON NEBRASKA
21:05:00 AVENUE, THAT'S REPRESENTED BY THE RED, AND THE RED
21:05:05 REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
21:05:08 SO IT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION FOR UP TO COMMERCIAL
21:05:12 INTENSIVE USES.
21:05:14 THIS PORTION OF NORTH 14th STREET BETWEEN LINEBAUGH
21:05:20 AVENUE AND EAST 98th AVENUE HAS AN AVERAGE EXISTING
21:05:25 DENSITY OF 6.91 UNITS PER ACRE.
21:05:29 THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AT A DENSITY OF
21:05:32 3.46 UNITS PER ACRE, WELL BELOW THE AVERAGE FOR THIS PART
21:05:37 OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:05:39 IT'S ALSO BELOW THE MAXIMUM 20 UNITS THAT CAN BE
21:05:44 CONSIDERED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
21:05:46 THE PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF UP TO
21:05:53 AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 18 UNITS PER ACRE FOR THIS SITE.
21:05:58 AND THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THAT UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND
21:06:01 USE DESIGNATION AND WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR
21:06:04 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, ESPECIALLY
21:06:07 SINCE DUPLEXES AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ALREADY COEXIST
21:06:12 IN THE AREA.
21:06:14 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
21:06:18 STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE
21:06:20 PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:06:23 PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:06:27 THANK YOU.
21:06:27 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
21:06:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:06:35 >> THANK YOU, DAVID.
21:06:36 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SHARED SCREEN?
21:06:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE IT.
21:06:55 >> ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:06:57 FILE REZ 21-14 FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS 9904 NORTH 14th
21:07:04 STREET.
21:07:05 PROPOSING FOR REZONING FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL
21:07:09 SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18.
21:07:14 THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE, NO
21:07:19 WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED.
21:07:22 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 25,200 SQUARE
21:07:27 FEET OR .58 ACRES.
21:07:30 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH
21:07:34 BROOK STREET AND EAST 99th AVENUE.
21:07:37 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
21:07:39 DWELLINGS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST IN THE RS
21:07:43 50 ZONE DISTRICT.
21:07:46 THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF
21:07:48 TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING,
21:07:51 INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING.
21:07:54 THIS APPLICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE
21:07:57 FULLY DEVELOPED TO THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS.
21:08:01 AS YOU SEE HERE IS THE OVERHEAD VIEW, OVERHEAD MAP.
21:08:07 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN THE RED OUTLINE RIGHT THERE
21:08:13 WHERE THE CURSOR IS.
21:08:14 AS YOU SEE TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE NORTH BROOK STREET.
21:08:17 TO THE NORTH EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
21:08:20 TO THE EAST YOU HAVE NORTH 14th STREET AND TO THE SOUTH
21:08:23 YOU HAVE EAST 99th AVENUE.
21:08:26 PICTURE OF THE SITE HERE.
21:08:34 THIS IS A VACANT LOT RIGHT NOW.
21:08:35 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE INTERSECTION WITH
21:08:39 RESIDENTIAL FAMILY HOME.
21:08:41 TO THE SOUTHEAST, YOU ALSO HAVE ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY
21:08:43 HOME.
21:08:44 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE WE HAVE THREE PICTURES HERE OF
21:08:48 HOMES, RESIDENTIAL.
21:08:53 TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE, ANOTHER HOME.
21:08:55 AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, ANOTHER HOME.
21:09:00 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ALSO SURROUNDED BY HOMES.
21:09:03 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
21:09:08 THE APPLICATION AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:09:16 CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
21:09:19 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:09:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:09:24 NO.
21:09:25 ALL RIGHT, WE GO TO THE APPLICANT.
21:09:26 IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:09:29 I SEE PETER.
21:09:30 RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.
21:09:32 >>THE CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE
21:09:38 TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
21:09:41 >> YES.
21:09:41 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
21:09:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:09:51 >> AM I SUPPOSED TO DO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY?
21:09:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
21:09:55 >> YEAH, AS PRESENTED, WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY, AND WHEN
21:10:00 WE LOOKED AT IT, WE WANTED TO DO A MULTIFAMILY
21:10:04 RESIDENTIAL ON THE SITE, THE RM-18 ZONING IS WHAT WE CAN
21:10:08 ADHERE TO, AND THAT IS WHAT OUR REQUEST IS.
21:10:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:10:13 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
21:10:16 >> NO.
21:10:17 THANK YOU.
21:10:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
21:10:18 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK
21:10:23 FOR ITEM NUMBER 5?
21:10:30 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
21:10:32 ITEM.
21:10:33 >> THIS IS AILEEN ROSARIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH AND
21:10:36 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM.
21:10:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:10:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
21:10:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
21:10:46 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:10:47 AYE.
21:10:48 COUNCILMAN CITRO, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 5.
21:10:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE REZ-21-14, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED
21:10:56 FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING
21:10:59 PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 9904 NORTH 14th
21:11:03 STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE
21:11:05 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
21:11:08 CLASSIFICATION RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) TO
21:11:11 RM-18 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
21:11:16 DATE.
21:11:16 I CONCUR WITH THE FINDINGS AND REASONINGS OF THE PLANNING
21:11:19 COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF.
21:11:22 MORE ESPECIALLY, THAT THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE
21:11:25 DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER
21:11:28 THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY
21:11:32 8.14.1 AND PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFECT AND
21:11:41 SUSTAINABILITY USED IN LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
21:11:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN
21:11:49 VIERA.
21:11:50 ROLL CALL VOTE.
21:11:50 >>THE CLERK: GUDES?
21:11:51 MIRANDA?
21:11:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:11:59 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:12:01 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:12:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:12:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:12:06 >>THE CLERK: DINGFELDER.
21:12:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:12:09 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH GUDES ABSENT AT VOTE.
21:12:12 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD MAY 6 AT
21:12:16 9:30 A.M.
21:12:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 6.
21:12:22 >> THANK YOU.
21:12:22 ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:12:24 GOING OVER CASE REZ 21-15, PROPERTY ADDRESS 2710 AND 2724
21:12:31 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:12:33 THIS IS PROPOSING REZONE FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL
21:12:36 SINGLE-FAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI
21:12:40 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
21:12:42 I'LL PASS THIS ALONG TO DAVID OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
21:12:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HEY, YOU'RE MUTED.
21:12:54 >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU, ZAIN.
21:12:56 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:12:58 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:13:00 WE ARE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS
21:13:03 NEXT CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE
21:13:08 IN THE MacFARLANE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:13:11 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP TO THE SUBJECT SITE IS ABOUT 150
21:13:15 FEET TO THE WEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH HABANA
21:13:18 AVENUE AND WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:13:22 THAT'S SERVED BY HART ROUTE 15.
21:13:25 THE SUBJECT SITE DOES FALL WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION
21:13:28 ZONE.
21:13:29 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:13:37 AS YOU CAN SEE, COLUMBUS DRIVE IS ON THE NORTH AND THEN
21:13:42 HABANA IS TO THE WEST.
21:13:48 AS YOU CAN SEE ABOUT FROM HERE DOWN, IT'S MORE COMMERCIAL
21:13:54 PATTERN ALONG COLUMBUS, AND THEN ACTUALLY TO THE NORTH
21:13:59 AND EAST AND TO THE SOUTH OF THIS SUBJECT SITE, THERE ARE
21:14:04 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOUSES FRONTING RIGHT ON TO
21:14:10 COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:14:10 AND THEN THERE'S ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL FURTHER DOWN NEAR
21:14:14 ARMENIA AND COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:14:18 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:14:23 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PARCELS IN THE RED ARE THAT
21:14:27 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, SO THAT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION
21:14:31 FOR CI USES.
21:14:35 SOUTH OF WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, IT DOES GO DOWN TO A
21:14:38 RESIDENTIAL 20.
21:14:40 THAT'S THAT LIGHTER BROWN.
21:14:42 AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL 10 TO THE WEST OF
21:14:47 NORTH HABANA.
21:14:49 THE NORTH SIDE OF COLUMBUS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET
21:14:53 FROM THIS SUBJECT SITE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35.
21:14:57 THAT'S REPRESENTED BY THE PINK.
21:14:58 THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR A MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL GENERAL
21:15:03 USES.
21:15:04 SO A LITTLE LESS INTENSE TO THE NORTH.
21:15:09 AND HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL 35 FURTHER TO THE EAST.
21:15:12 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35
21:15:20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
21:15:22 IT DOES ALLOW FOR THAT INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
21:15:29 THE PROPOSED CI ZONING DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT
21:15:34 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
21:15:37 COMMERCIAL 35.
21:15:39 CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED CI ZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR THE
21:15:43 DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
21:15:48 SURROUNDING USES, ESPECIALLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT
21:15:51 SITE, AND THE CI IS WHAT'S ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT
21:15:57 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
21:15:59 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
21:16:02 STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED
21:16:07 REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
21:16:10 IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:16:17 >> THANK YOU, DAVID.
21:16:18 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN?
21:16:30 >> ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:16:33 CASE REZ 21-15, PROPERTY ADDRESS 2710 AND 2724 WEST
21:16:49 COLUMBUS DRIVE.
21:16:51 PROPOSING A REZONE FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
21:16:54 AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
21:16:59 THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE IN
21:17:03 WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED.
21:17:05 THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A RETAIL SALES
21:17:15 USE AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.
21:17:19 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL AND DETACHED
21:17:21 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH IN THE COMMERCIAL
21:17:24 GENERAL AND RS 50 DISTRICT.
21:17:27 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST IN THE RS 50 ZONING
21:17:30 DISTRICT.
21:17:31 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH IN THE RESIDENTIAL
21:17:33 MULTIFAMILY AND RS 50 ZONING DISTRICTS AND COMMERCIAL USE
21:17:38 TO THE WEST IN THE CG ZONING DISTRICT.
21:17:40 THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND MUST
21:17:43 COMPLY WITH WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
21:17:46 DESIGN STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
21:17:48 THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF
21:17:52 TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING,
21:17:55 INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING.
21:17:58 THIS HAPPEN INDICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO
21:18:00 BE FULLY DEVELOPED UNDER CI ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS.
21:18:06 AS YOU CAN SEE, THE OVERHEAD SITE, THE SITE IS ACTUALLY
21:18:14 BORDERED IN RED HERE.
21:18:16 SO AS YOU SEE, THE RED HERE IS -- THAT THE WEST PORTION
21:18:22 IN THE CI ZONING AND THE EAST IS IN THE RS 50 ZONING.
21:18:26 TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE, COMMERCIAL ALL
21:18:31 ALONG, AND THEN TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE WEST ST. JOSEPH
21:18:36 STREET.
21:18:36 AND ALSO YOU HAVE RM 16 RIGHT BELOW IT.
21:18:40 TO THE WEST YOU HAVE NORTH HABANA AVENUE AND TO THE EAST
21:18:47 YOU HAVE NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
21:18:49 PICTURE OF THE SITE, THE SITE YOU'LL SEE ON THE WEST
21:18:55 COLUMBUS DRIVE JENNIE'S FLOWER SHOP AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL
21:19:01 SINGLE-FAMILY.
21:19:01 VIEW LOOKING EAST ON COLUMBUS, STREET VIEW.
21:19:08 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE A DANCE COMPANY, DANCE
21:19:12 STUDIO.
21:19:13 SOUTH OF THE SITE, NORTH HABANA AVENUE, SINGLE-FAMILY
21:19:25 HOME.
21:19:26 LOOKING EAST ON WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, YOU CAN SEE HOMES
21:19:30 DOWN THE STREET.
21:19:31 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE ON WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET,
21:19:36 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.
21:19:37 SOUTH OF THE SITE VACANT LOT AND ALSO A SINGLE-FAMILY
21:19:44 HOME.
21:19:44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
21:19:51 APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:19:53 CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
21:19:55 .
21:20:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SEE GREG ON THE LINE.
21:20:03 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN, SIR.
21:20:08 [OATH ADMINISTERED]
21:20:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:20:14 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR YOUR
21:20:16 TIME AND CONSIDERATION TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM.
21:20:18 AFTER REVIEWING STAFF'S REPORT AND HEARING THE
21:20:22 PRESENTATION TONIGHT, WE HAVE NO FURTHER COMMENT.
21:20:25 WE ARE IN FULL AGREEMENT WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.
21:20:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:20:31 ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
21:20:32 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON
21:20:35 ITEM NUMBER 6?
21:20:37 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
21:20:39 ITEM.
21:20:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
21:20:40 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY DOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
21:20:43 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
21:20:45 THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
21:20:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM
21:20:49 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:20:51 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:20:54 COUNCILMAN CITRO, I BELIEVE YOU WERE THE LAST ONE TO
21:20:57 READ, CORRECT?
21:20:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:20:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:21:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: FILE REZ 21-15, ORDINANCE BEING
21:21:06 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
21:21:08 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
21:21:10 2710 AND 2724 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
21:21:14 FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
21:21:16 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50, RENTING
21:21:19 SINGLE-FAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI
21:21:22 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:21:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:21:26 SECOND FROM VIERA.
21:21:27 ROLL CALL.
21:21:30 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:21:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:21:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:21:34 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:21:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:21:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:21:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:21:40 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:21:41 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6 AT
21:21:45 9:30 A.M.
21:21:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 7.
21:21:48 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
21:21:53 >> ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:21:57 CASE REZ 21-16, PROPERTY ADDRESS 6800 NORTH NEBRASKA
21:22:03 AVENUE.
21:22:04 IT IS PROPOSING A REZONE FROM SH-CI, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS,
21:22:15 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, AND SH-RS, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:22:21 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, TO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:22:24 MULTIFAMILY.
21:22:25 PASS IT ALONG TO DAVID.
21:22:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HEY.
21:22:29 >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU, ZAIN.
21:22:31 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:22:37 WE REMAIN IN THIS CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR
21:22:41 THIS NEXT CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:22:46 URBAN VILLAGE.
21:22:47 AND ALSO IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:22:51 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:22:52 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A
21:22:56 HUNDRED FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT NORTH
21:22:58 NEBRASKA AVENUE AND EAST SLIGH.
21:23:00 IT IS SERVED BY THE ROUTE 400, WHICH IS THE METRO RAPID
21:23:04 WHICH CONNECTS THE SUBJECT SITE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA IN THE
21:23:08 UNIVERSITY AREA TRANSIT CENTER.
21:23:10 ALSO, THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN
21:23:14 EVACUATION ZONE.
21:23:15 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:23:20 THIS IS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:23:22 IT'S ABOUT A BLOCK SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH
21:23:26 NEBRASKA AND EAST SLIGH.
21:23:30 THIS AREA, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S COMMERCIAL USES ALONG
21:23:34 THIS SEGMENT.
21:23:36 THIS IS THE 7th SON BREWERY DIRECTLY TO THE EAST, YOU
21:23:42 HAVE SOME AUTO SALES AND DETAILING COMMERCIAL USES TO THE
21:23:48 NORTH AND THEN THIS IS THE OASIS MOTEL DIRECTLY TO THE
21:23:52 SOUTH.
21:23:54 BEHIND THE SUBJECT SITE, THERE ARE SOME VACANT LOTS AND
21:23:58 SOME SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ESPECIALLY DOWN ELM STREET
21:24:02 AND THE STREET RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH.
21:24:05 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:24:09 THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTY IN RED IS THE
21:24:12 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
21:24:13 AND IT TRANSITIONS AS YOU MOVE WESTWARD, IT TRANSITIONS
21:24:17 DOWN TO THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35, WHICH JUST ALLOWS AN
21:24:23 INTENSITY OF CG AND THEN YOU GO DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL
21:24:26 10.
21:24:27 SO THERE IS ANTICIPATION THAT THIS INTERSECTION AND THIS
21:24:31 AREA WILL INTENSIFY LONG TERM UNDER THOSE LAND USE
21:24:37 CATEGORIES.
21:24:37 THE SUBJECT SITE, AGAIN, IS WITHIN THAT CC 35, SO WE ARE
21:24:44 LOOKING FOR SINGLE AND VERTICAL MIXED USE TO DEVELOP LONG
21:24:51 TERM IN THESE AREAS, AND THE PROPOSED SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:24:56 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PROVIDES AN
21:25:00 EXCELLENT INFILL OPPORTUNITY ON A TRANSIT CORRIDOR WITHIN
21:25:07 EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIL SERVICES.
21:25:10 IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED SEMINOLE HEIGHTS MULTIFAMILY
21:25:16 RESIDENTIAL ZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
21:25:20 COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE
21:25:23 SURROUNDING USES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT
21:25:26 PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
21:25:30 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
21:25:33 STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED
21:25:37 REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
21:25:40 IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:25:43 THANK YOU.
21:25:43 AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
21:25:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:25:46 BACK TO YOU, SIR.
21:25:47 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: THANK YOU, DAVID.
21:25:48 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN?
21:25:51 THANK YOU.
21:25:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, WE CAN IT.
21:25:54 GO AHEAD.
21:25:56 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:26:01 CASE NUMBER REZ 21-16, PROPERTY ADDRESS 6800 NORTH
21:26:07 NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:26:10 PROPOSING A REZONING FROM SH-CI SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:26:14 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:26:17 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO SHRM SEMINOLE
21:26:20 HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
21:26:21 THIS IS THE EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE NO
21:26:26 WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED.
21:26:27 THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 100 BY 215 FEET FOR A TOTAL
21:26:34 LOT AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 21,500 SQUARE FEET AS LOCATED
21:26:39 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND
21:26:43 EAST ELM STREET INTERSECTION.
21:26:45 THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY A MOTEL AND
21:26:48 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE SOUTH IN THE SH-RS
21:26:52 AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS.
21:26:56 COMMERCIAL USES TO THE EAST IN THE SH-CI ZONING DISTRICT,
21:27:01 A COMMERCIAL USE TO THE NORTH IN THE SH-CI ZONING
21:27:04 DISTRICT AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE WEST
21:27:06 IN THE SH-RS ZONING DISTRICT.
21:27:09 THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF
21:27:12 TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT TIME OF PERMITTING,
21:27:16 INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING.
21:27:18 THIS APPLICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE
21:27:22 FULLY DEVELOPED UNDER SHRM ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS.
21:27:25 IF YOU'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE
21:27:30 OVERHEAD VIEW.
21:27:31 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTLINED IN RED AS YOU SEE MY
21:27:34 CURSOR IS RIGHT ALONG THE RED.
21:27:37 TO THE EASTERN PORTION IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL
21:27:40 INTENSIVE AND THE WESTERN PORTION IS THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
21:27:42 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
21:27:44 TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE EAST SLIGH AVENUE.
21:27:48 TO THE WEST YOU HAVE 275.
21:27:51 TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE EAST ELM STREET AND TO THE WEST --
21:27:56 OR TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:27:58 LOOKING AT THE PICTURES HERE TO THE WEST END OF THE SITE
21:28:04 ON ELM STREET, TO THE SITE ITSELF WITH A GARAGE, SOUTH OF
21:28:16 THE SITE AND LOOKING DOWN ELM STREET, YOU CAN SEE THE
21:28:22 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
21:28:23 SOUTH OF THE SITE ALSO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND ALSO THE
21:28:26 WEST OF THE SITE THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
21:28:28 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
21:28:38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
21:28:41 APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:28:45 CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
21:28:46 I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
21:28:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:28:49 NEXT UP, WE HAVE JUAN QUINONES.
21:28:57 RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.
21:29:01 [OATH]
21:29:05 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
21:29:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
21:29:08 >> MY NAME IS JUAN QUINONES REPRESENTING THE CLIENT,
21:29:14 AUTHORIZED AGENT.
21:29:15 WE ARE APPLYING TO GO FROM SH-CI AND SH-RS TO SHRM,
21:29:27 SEMINOLE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
21:29:31 DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
21:29:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
21:29:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH, JUST CURIOUS, MR. CHAIR.
21:29:40 GENTLEMEN, YOU HAD TO NOTICE THE VARIOUS NEIGHBORS AS
21:29:45 WELL AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
21:29:47 I'M NOT SURE, MR. CHAIRMAN CAN PROBABLY HELP ME --
21:29:52 PROBABLY OSHNA AS FAR AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION,
21:29:56 OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
21:29:59 DID YOU GET ANY CALLS OR COMMENTS BACK FROM THE NEIGHBORS
21:30:01 OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION?
21:30:04 >> NO.
21:30:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING?
21:30:07 >> NO.
21:30:07 NONE.
21:30:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CRICKETS, HUH?
21:30:10 THANK YOU, SIR.
21:30:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:30:12 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE SECOND
21:30:15 FLOOR?
21:30:20 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
21:30:23 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
21:30:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
21:30:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN
21:30:29 MIRANDA.
21:30:30 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:30:31 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:30:34 COUNCILMAN CARLSON, NUMBER 7.
21:30:36 >>BILL CARLSON: YES, SIR.
21:30:38 THANK YOU.
21:30:39 I'D LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ 21-16, ORDINANCE BEING
21:30:43 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE
21:30:46 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 6800 NORTH
21:30:49 NEBRASKA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE
21:30:51 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
21:30:53 CLASSIFICATION SH-RS (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, RESIDENTIAL,
21:30:58 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED) AND SH-CI (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS,
21:31:01 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE) TO SH-RM (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS,
21:31:05 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:31:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
21:31:08 >>BILL CARLSON: I'D LIKE TO MAKE A NOTE THAT THE PLANNING
21:31:13 COMMISSION AND STAFF HAVE FOUND THIS CONSISTENT.
21:31:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
21:31:18 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
21:31:20 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
21:31:22 ROLL CALL VOTE?
21:31:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:31:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:31:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:31:27 >>LUIS VIERA: [INAUDIBLE]
21:31:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:31:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:31:31 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:31:33 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:31:35 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT
21:31:42 9:30 A.M.
21:31:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 8.
21:31:45 >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:31:50 ITEM NUMBER 8 IS REZ 21-17 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
21:31:54 902 EAST 25th AVENUE.
21:31:56 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 50 AND CG
21:32:00 COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
21:32:04 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT.
21:32:06 I WILL HAND IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR
21:32:08 REPORT, AND IF YOU CAN PLEASE COME BACK TO ME TO COMPLETE
21:32:12 MY REPORT.
21:32:13 THANK YOU.
21:32:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
21:32:16 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
21:32:18 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:32:20 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:32:22 THIS NEXT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
21:32:26 PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE VM YBOR
21:32:30 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:32:31 IT IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
21:32:36 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT.
21:32:40 THERE'S TRANSIT WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE SITE TO THE WEST
21:32:44 ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:32:46 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS BORRELL PARK,
21:32:50 WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY ONE-FOURTH OF A MILE TO THE
21:32:53 NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:32:54 THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION
21:32:57 ZONE.
21:32:57 WE HAVE THE AERIAL.
21:33:00 IT'S A SMALL PARCEL.
21:33:01 HERE'S 25th -- EAST 25th AVENUE.
21:33:04 THEN YOU'VE GOT NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:33:08 THIS IS THE -- CHURCH HERE.
21:33:11 IT IS EITHER SCATTERED VACANT LOTS, SOME COMMERCIAL
21:33:15 ESTABLISHMENTS ALL ALONG THIS SEGMENT.
21:33:18 THEN WHEN YOU GO DOWN TO THE EAST INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD,
21:33:21 IT'S PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
21:33:26 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:33:30 THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH --
21:33:37 NORTHWEST AND SOUTH IN THAT KIND OF PINK COLOR IS THE
21:33:40 COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35.
21:33:43 SO IT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION UP TO CG ZONING DISTRICT.
21:33:49 DIRECTLY TO THE EAST IN THE BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
21:33:53 SO WE TYPICALLY SEE TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AND ATTACHED --
21:33:59 RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED IN THESE AREAS.
21:34:00 AND THEN WITHIN THE TAN COLORS TO THE NORTH AND FURTHER
21:34:04 TO THE EAST, EAST OF NORTH 10th STREET, IT'S THAT
21:34:10 RESIDENTIAL 10.
21:34:11 THAT'S THE AREAS THAT ARE LONG TERM TO REMAIN
21:34:14 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
21:34:15 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
21:34:18 APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE
21:34:21 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:34:22 THIS PORTION OF EAST 25th AVENUE HAS AN EXISTING
21:34:25 DENSITY OF 7.58 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
21:34:28 THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSING ONE SINGLE-FAMILY
21:34:31 RESIDENCE AT AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 9.09 DWELLING UNITS
21:34:36 PER ACRE, WHICH IS WELL UNDER THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UP
21:34:39 UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE
21:34:42 DESIGNATION.
21:34:44 AS DESCRIBED IN LAND USE POLICY 6.1.13, LAND RECOGNIZED
21:34:50 UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 DESIGNATION ARE
21:34:54 CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR, MIXED USE
21:34:58 CORRIDORS ARE IDENTIFIED AS THOSE AREAS WITH THE GREATEST
21:35:01 OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPORT THE GRADUAL TRANSFORMATION OF ROAD
21:35:06 CORRIDORS WHERE INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE AND
21:35:08 ENCOURAGED TO CREATE NEW HOUSING AND JOB OPPORTUNITIES
21:35:11 WHILE IMPROVING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT, THE LOOK OF
21:35:15 THE STREET, PROVIDING RETAIL AND TRANSIT AMENITIES FOR
21:35:18 THE RESIDENTS.
21:35:19 THE PROPOSAL SUPPORTS THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES BY
21:35:24 ORIENTING THE HOUSE TO THE STREET AND PROVIDING
21:35:27 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION.
21:35:29 IT DOES ALSO SUPPORT THE INFILL POLICIES, ESPECIALLY LAND
21:35:37 USE POLICY 9.2.1 AND HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4 THAT SEEKS TO
21:35:43 DIRECT INFILL INTO APPROPRIATE AREAS WHERE TRANSIT IS
21:35:49 AVAILABLE, WHERE COMMERCIAL IS AVAILABLE, AND THAT IS
21:35:53 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
21:35:55 SO IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE
21:35:58 DEVELOPED WITH A SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT, LOT SIZE, AND
21:36:02 SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
21:36:04 THE PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:36:08 IT WOULD NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
21:36:10 OF THIS PORTION OF THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:36:13 FURTHERMORE, THE REQUEST WOULD CREATE ADDITIONAL HOUSING
21:36:16 OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THAT EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, WHICH
21:36:19 IS ALSO ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:36:22 BASED ON ALL THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING
21:36:24 COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT
21:36:26 THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH
21:36:29 THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
21:36:33 PLAN.
21:36:33 THANK YOU.
21:36:34 AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
21:36:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:36:37 ALL RIGHT.
21:36:38 LaCHONE.
21:36:38 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
21:36:42 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:36:44 AND I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN.
21:36:48 CAN YOU SEE MY PowerPoint?
21:36:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:36:50 WE SEE A SCREEN.
21:36:52 GO AHEAD.
21:36:52 >>LaCHONE DOCK: OKAY.
21:36:53 THANK YOU.
21:36:54 SO THE REQUEST IS REZONING FROM RS 50 IN CG TO PD FOR
21:36:59 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT.
21:37:01 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS REQUESTED WITH THIS PD REQUEST, AND
21:37:05 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY FOR
21:37:08 DETACHED RESIDENTIAL.
21:37:11 THE LOT MEASURES 49 FEET IN WIDTH AND 102 FEET IN LENGTH.
21:37:15 IT HAS A TOTAL LOT AREA OF 4,998 SQUARE FEET.
21:37:19 THE SITE IS LOCATED ON EAST 25th AVENUE AS SHOWN BY THE
21:37:25 MAP PROVIDED BY DAVID HEY.
21:37:27 IT IS ALSO EAST OF NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
21:37:31 I'LL SHOW YOU FURTHER ON THE AERIAL THAT I'LL PROVIDE.
21:37:34 THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE BELVEDERE PLACE, GIBSON
21:37:39 SUBDIVISION.
21:37:40 LOT 12 OF BLOCK 6.
21:37:42 RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 50
21:37:46 FEET AND LOT AREA OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
21:37:49 SO THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP THE SITE IS THROUGH THIS PD
21:37:52 PROCESS.
21:37:52 THE LOT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM RS 50 STANDARDS.
21:37:56 THE BUILDING SETBACKS PROPOSED ARE TO THE SOUTH 26 FEET.
21:38:01 TO THE WEST AND THE EAST 5 FEET.
21:38:04 NORTH IS 15 FEET.
21:38:06 AND THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND
21:38:09 MUST COMPLY WITH THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS.
21:38:12 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 35 FEET.
21:38:16 SO WE DID AN ANALYSIS OF THE AREA, AND OF THAT
21:38:20 SUBDIVISION, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN 1905, WIDTH
21:38:25 LOTS THAT MEASURED IN WIDTHS THAT VARIED FROM 61 FEET TO
21:38:30 164 FEET, AND WITH THE DEPTHS OF THE LOTS AT 102 FEET TO
21:38:35 300 FEET.
21:38:36 THE OVERALL SUBDIVISION INCLUDED 92 LOTS.
21:38:40 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EASTERN 49 FEET OF
21:38:44 LOT 12 OF BLOCK 6.
21:38:46 SO THE OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDED 352 TOTAL ZONING
21:38:51 LOTS, 332 OR 94% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A
21:38:57 WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR GREATER.
21:38:59 AND 20 OR 6% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99
21:39:04 FEET OR LESS.
21:39:05 IN A REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE
21:39:08 SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 18 TOTAL ZONING LOTS, 17 OR 94% OF
21:39:12 THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR
21:39:15 GREATER.
21:39:16 AND ONE OR 6% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99
21:39:20 FEET OR LESS.
21:39:21 THE 900 BLOCK, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE 900 BLOCK OF EAST
21:39:25 25th AVENUE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET CONTAINS THE 17
21:39:29 ZONING LOTS, 16 OF THOSE LOTS OR 94% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE
21:39:34 BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR GREATER.
21:39:38 AND ONE, OR 6%, HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99
21:39:42 FEET OR LESS.
21:39:44 A TOTAL OF 90% OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACE HAS BEEN
21:39:47 DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH GREATER THAN 50 FEET.
21:39:50 SO STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
21:39:52 PATTERN IN THAT STUDY AREA AND IN THE SUBJECT BLOCK AND
21:39:56 BLOCK FACE ARE COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF LOTS GREATER THAN 50
21:40:02 FEET IN WIDTH.
21:40:03 STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED 49-FOOT LOT WIDTH IS
21:40:07 INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE
21:40:09 STUDY AREA.
21:40:10 THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP.
21:40:16 THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE BLACK
21:40:21 OUTLINE WITH THE STRIPE RUNNING THROUGH IT.
21:40:24 THIS IS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE TO THE WEST.
21:40:26 THIS IS 26th AVENUE TO THE NORTH AND 25th AVENUE IS
21:40:30 WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED.
21:40:34 AND THIS IS THE PATTERN, THE LOT WIDTHS THAT ARE TYPICAL
21:40:38 ON THE BLOCK.
21:40:39 THESE ARE THE LOTS THAT ARE REFERRED TO IN THE BLOCK FACE
21:40:41 IN THE 900 BLOCK OF 25th AVENUE.
21:40:44 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
21:40:48 THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE IN RED ON THIS MAP AND TO ORIENT
21:40:53 YOU ON THIS MAP, THIS IS NEBRASKA AVENUE TO THE WEST.
21:40:57 25th AVENUE, THE LOCATION OF THE SITE, AND THEN THIS IS
21:41:01 10th STREET, WHICH IS EAST OF THE SITE, AND 26th
21:41:04 AVENUE IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
21:41:07 AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS SITE HAS THAT ZONING OF THE CG
21:41:10 WITH A LITTLE SLIVER OF THAT RS 50, AND IT'S SURROUNDED
21:41:16 TO THE EAST WITH RS 50 ZONING.
21:41:18 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
21:41:21 SO YOU CAN SEE IT IS PROPOSING THE STRUCTURE,
21:41:24 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE WITH A DRIVEWAY AND A
21:41:28 GARAGE PROPOSED.
21:41:30 AND THEN THE ELEVATIONS ARE PROVIDED WITHIN THE -- ON THE
21:41:34 PAGE WITH THE SITE PLAN IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER.
21:41:37 AND THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
21:41:42 SO TO THE LEFT IS THE SITE.
21:41:44 THIS IS THE SITE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
21:41:49 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE.
21:41:54 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
21:41:57 THIS IS AT THE CORNER ON NEBRASKA.
21:42:00 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE VIEW LOOKING EAST ON
21:42:03 25th AVENUE.
21:42:04 AND YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS THE --
21:42:09 ALONG THAT STREET.
21:42:10 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
21:42:13 THIS IS ON 26th AVENUE.
21:42:16 AND THIS IS ALSO ANOTHER PICTURE NORTH OF THE SITE ON
21:42:19 26th AVENUE.
21:42:21 THERE ARE TWO VACANT LOTS.
21:42:23 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
21:42:26 THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH
21:42:30 CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
21:42:32 PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDINGS BY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
21:42:36 IN RELATION TO THE INCONSISTENCY WITH THE EXISTING
21:42:40 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
21:42:42 IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS
21:42:45 APPLICATION, THERE ARE MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO THE SITE
21:42:48 PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
21:42:51 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
21:42:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:42:55 DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT IN PERSON HERE ON THE SECOND
21:43:06 FLOOR, ITEM 8?
21:43:07 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN, SIR.
21:43:09 >> I'VE BEEN SWORN IN ALREADY.
21:43:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S RIGHT.
21:43:12 YOU'RE IN PERSON.
21:43:13 GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:43:13 >> MY NAME IS BLAKE FRAZIER.
21:43:16 I AM THE AGENT FOR THIS APPLICATION.
21:43:18 I'D LIKE TO THANK CITY STAFF AND COUNTY COMMISSION FOR
21:43:22 THEIR STUDY ON THIS PROPERTY.
21:43:24 AS LaCHONE SAID, THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP THIS SITE IS
21:43:29 THROUGH THE PD PROCESS.
21:43:32 SO THIS PROPERTY BACK IN 2013 WAS BOUGHT THROUGH A
21:43:40 BANK-OWNED SALE.
21:43:42 AND AT THAT TIME, THE PROPERTY WAS TRANSFERRED EAST 49
21:43:47 FEET OF LOT 12, LOT 13, AND THE WEST 12 FEET OF LOT 14.
21:43:53 THEN IN DECEMBER OF 2016, THE OWNER QUITCLAIMED THE EAST
21:43:57 49 FEET OF LOT 12 INTO AN LLC OWNERSHIP AND THE OWNER
21:44:03 SOLD THE HOUSE WHICH SAT ON LOT 13 AND THE WEST 12 FEET
21:44:08 OF LOT 14 TO THE FUTURE OWNER.
21:44:12 THAT WAS IN A LEGAL LAW SPLIT.
21:44:16 SINCE THAT SALE BACK IN DECEMBER 2016, BOTH THE VACANT
21:44:20 LOT AND THE PROPERTY THAT USED TO BE ADJOINED WITH HAVE
21:44:25 BEEN TRANSFERRED IN OWNERSHIP MORE THAN ONCE.
21:44:30 OUR APPLICATION SOLELY SEEKS TO ALLOW SINGLE-FAMILY
21:44:33 DETACHED CONSTRUCTION ON THE VACANT LOT.
21:44:36 THAT PREVIOUSLY EXISTED AS PART OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
21:44:40 DETACHED PROPERTY.
21:44:42 WHILE THIS LOT LACKS THE FRONT FOOTAGE AND OVERALL SIZE
21:44:46 TYPICALLY FOUND ON THE STREETSCAPE OR THE OVERALL AREA
21:44:49 STATED IN THE CITY STAFF STUDY, THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS
21:44:52 STATED IN OUR APPLICATION DO.
21:44:55 IF CITY COUNCIL FINDS THIS APPLICATION APPROVABLE, WE
21:44:59 WILL HAPPILY MAKE THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT CITY STAFF
21:45:02 RECOMMENDS BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND HEARING.
21:45:05 AND WITH THAT, I WILL OPEN MYSELF UP FOR QUESTIONS.
21:45:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
21:45:10 HEARING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT'S
21:45:13 HERE TO SPEAK?
21:45:14 I BELIEVE WE HAVE ONE REGISTERED PERSON TO SPEAK.
21:45:17 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC?
21:45:22 >> AILEEN ROSARIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT,
21:45:24 THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
21:45:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
21:45:27 DO WE HAVE THE REGISTERED SPEAKER.
21:45:30 I SEE AN IVAN RIVERA.
21:45:32 MADAM CLERK?
21:45:47 >> HE IS ON A DEVICE THAT WE CANNOT ELEVATE.
21:45:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN'T TAKE THE VIRTUAL SPEAKER
21:45:53 BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE CAMERA AND WHATNOT.
21:45:58 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL.
21:46:01 IF NOT, CAN WE GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
21:46:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
21:46:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
21:46:04 MIRANDA.
21:46:05 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
21:46:06 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:46:08 ALL IN FAVOR.
21:46:09 AYE.
21:46:10 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 8?
21:46:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT AT ALL, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:46:14 ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NUMBER REZ 21-17, MOVE AN ORDINANCE
21:46:21 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION: AN ORDINANCE
21:46:23 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 902 EAST
21:46:26 25th AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE
21:46:28 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
21:46:31 CLASSIFICATION RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) AND CG
21:46:35 (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
21:46:38 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED); PROVIDING AN
21:46:41 EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:46:41 LET ME SAY THAT IN THIS CASE, WE FIND IT CONSISTENT.
21:46:52 THE COMPLIANCE, APPLICABLE GOALS AND OBJECTIVE POLICIES
21:46:56 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARE CONSISTENT WITH LAND ZONING
21:47:00 OBJECTIVE 9.2, WHICH IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THERE IS AN
21:47:03 ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES
21:47:06 TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROJECTED POPULATION.
21:47:09 THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED
21:47:13 THE DENSITY APPLICABLE UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY
21:47:15 PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY 8.14 DASH POINT ONE.
21:47:22 THE APPLICANT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE POLICY
21:47:24 2.112 AND THE HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW
21:47:30 HOUSING ON VACANT UNUTILIZED LAND.
21:47:33 CERTAINLY, THIS HAS BEEN UNUTILIZED FOR MANY, MANY YEARS.
21:47:38 COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 27-136 PROPOSED
21:47:43 DEVELOPMENT HAS SHOWN THAT THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES AND
21:47:46 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION,
21:47:49 CHARACTER, COMPATIBILITY, AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.
21:47:54 PROMOTES THE EFFECTIVE SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND
21:47:58 INFRASTRUCTURE.
21:47:59 LET ME SAY THIS, I KNOW THAT MAN PRETTY WELL.
21:48:04 RAISED NOT TOO FAR FROM THERE, THAT TEXACO STATION.
21:48:09 ACROSS THE STREET ONE THE VALDEZ SCHOOL, INDIVIDUAL WHO
21:48:15 OWNED THAT BIG HOUSE, AND WHERE THIS GENTLEMAN IS TALKING
21:48:18 AT, THIS AREA IS IN TRANSITION, AND IT NEEDS HELP.
21:48:23 THIS AREA IS THE ONE THAT HAS HAD A LOT OF BAD PUBLICITY
21:48:28 FROM INDIVIDUALS WHO UNFORTUNATELY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO
21:48:31 TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES PROPERLY.
21:48:33 AND I THINK THIS WOULD HELP THE NEIGHBORHOOD RECOVER AND
21:48:37 GET IT KICK STARTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
21:48:39 THANK YOU.
21:48:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
21:48:41 AND THE REVISION SHEET AS WELL.
21:48:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MODIFICATION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND
21:48:44 SECOND READING.
21:48:45 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:48:46 I APPRECIATE YOUR HELP.
21:48:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:48:50 ROLL CALL VOTE.
21:48:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:48:52 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:48:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:48:54 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:48:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:48:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:48:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:49:02 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:49:03 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6 AT
21:49:06 9:30 A.M.
21:49:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE
21:49:10 RECESS.
21:49:12 WE'LL BE BACK.
21:49:13 [RECESS]
21:49:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER, WE'RE STILL
21:49:24 BROADCASTING FOR THOSE ON THE WEB.
21:49:26 THANKS.
21:49:27 [RECESS]
21:58:32 [ SOUNDING GAVEL ]
21:58:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:58:33 I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO
21:58:47 ORDER.
21:58:48 ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
21:58:50 >> VIERA?
21:58:51 GUDES?
21:58:51 CARLSON?
21:58:53 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
21:58:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
21:58:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
21:58:58 >> MIRANDA?
21:59:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MIRANDA?
21:59:02 >>THE CLERK: MIRANDA?
21:59:03 AND MANISCALCO?
21:59:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
21:59:12 >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT.
21:59:15 >> YOU SHOULD PROBABLY TELL PEOPLE THAT YOUR GAVEL
21:59:17 DISAPPEARED.
21:59:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
21:59:22 ITEM NUMBER 9.
21:59:24 ITEM NUMBER 9.
21:59:40 DO WE HAVE LaCHONE ON THE LINE?
21:59:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SHE WENT HOME.
22:00:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE LaCHONE ON THE LINE SO
22:00:24 WE CAN CONTINUE WITH ITEM NUMBER 9?
22:00:28 IS THERE A TECHNICAL THING?
22:00:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE JUST JUMP TO DAVID HEY.
22:00:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DAVID HEY, ARE YOU ON THE LINE?
22:00:52 >> DID WE LOSE EVERYBODY?
22:00:53 IT'S THE TWILIGHT ZONE.
22:00:59 IT'S JUST US NOW.
22:01:10 >> YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TAKE BREAKS LATE AT
22:01:13 NIGHT.
22:01:13 FIVE MINUTES BECOMES 20.
22:01:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE LaCHONE ON.
22:01:26 GO AHEAD, LaCHONE, ITEM 9.
22:01:29 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.
22:01:30 ITEM 9 IS REZ 21-18.
22:01:33 IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3724 WEST SAN PEDRO
22:01:38 STREET.
22:01:38 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD BUSINESS
22:01:42 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO PD, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
22:01:46 I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING
22:01:48 COMMISSION AND IF YOU COULD RETURN BACK TO ME TO COMPLETE
22:01:52 THE REPORT.
22:01:52 THANK YOU.
22:01:53 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
22:01:55 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
22:01:57 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
22:01:58 YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE MY SCREEN.
22:02:01 WE'RE MOVING DOWN TO THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,
22:02:04 MORE SPECIFICALLY THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:02:08 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 300
22:02:11 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE CORNER OF
22:02:13 SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND WEST SAN JUAN STREET.
22:02:18 CLOSEST PUBLIC PARK IS PALMA CEIA PARK, APPROXIMATELY ONE
22:02:22 MILE TO THE NORTHEAST.
22:02:23 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
22:02:27 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL.
22:02:31 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE CENTER.
22:02:32 THIS IS DALE MABRY HIGHWAY RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH.
22:02:36 WE HAVE SAN PEDRO AND WEST OBISPO STREET TO THE SOUTH.
22:02:42 THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF DALE MABRY THAT IS MOSTLY BUILT
22:02:50 OUT WITH OFFICES.
22:02:54 AND THEN OFF THE CORRIDOR, DIRECTLY OFF THE CORRIDOR,
22:02:59 IT'S ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
22:03:04 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
22:03:07 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES
22:03:09 LINING THIS SECTION OF SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY ARE ALL
22:03:13 THAT RESIDENTIAL 20.
22:03:15 AND THEN ONE PARCEL IN, IT GOES DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL
22:03:20 10, WHICH IS THE TAN COLOR.
22:03:23 THIS DOES HAVE DIFFERENT LOCATIONAL CRITERIA UNDER THE
22:03:29 RESIDENTIAL 20 THAN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
22:03:32 CATEGORY.
22:03:33 THE SUBJECT SITE AS STATED IS IN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20.
22:03:37 THIS DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF LOWER
22:03:40 AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES SUCH AS SINGLE-FAMILY
22:03:44 DETACHED, ATTACHED, AND TOWNHOMES.
22:03:49 A LIMITED NUMBER OF NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES
22:03:52 AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IF THEY
22:03:58 MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND
22:04:01 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES.
22:04:02 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE COMMERCIAL
22:04:06 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND FINDS THAT THE SUBJECT SITE MEETS
22:04:10 THE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION.
22:04:11 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ADJACENT TO SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY
22:04:16 WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY AND EXISTING
22:04:19 NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON
22:04:23 THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST.
22:04:25 WHILE THE SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH LOCATIONAL CRITERIA
22:04:29 NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES THAT
22:04:32 WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT -- EXCUSE ME, THAT WOULD
22:04:36 HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL SHALL NOT
22:04:39 BE PERMITTED.
22:04:41 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE
22:04:43 ORIENTATION OF THE PROPOSED ROOFTOP PATIO, THE POTENTIAL
22:04:47 FOR ACTIVITIES ON THE PATIO, AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE
22:04:51 ADJACENT RESIDENTS TO THE EAST AND SOUTH.
22:04:53 ADDITIONALLY, THE PD PROPOSES A FOUR-FOOT SETBACK TO THE
22:04:56 EAST AND A FIVE-FOOT SETBACK TO THE SOUTH.
22:04:59 THESE CONCERNS WERE PRESENTED TO THE APPLICANT, AND THE
22:05:02 APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS BETWEEN
22:05:06 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
22:05:08 THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO MOVE THE DECK TO ORIENT
22:05:12 TOWARD DALE MABRY AND USE THE BUILDING AS SCREENING FROM
22:05:15 THE ADJACENT RESIDENCES.
22:05:17 THESE MODIFICATIONS WILL ADDRESS THE CONCERNS OF THE
22:05:19 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
22:05:21 ADDITIONALLY, CITY STAFF HAS PROVIDED A NOTE IN THEIR
22:05:24 REPORT RECOMMENDING THESE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND
22:05:27 SECOND READING AND CLOSELY COORDINATE WITH THE CITY
22:05:31 STAFF.
22:05:31 IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
22:05:34 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND THE
22:05:37 OFFICE USES WITHIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20.
22:05:40 FURTHERMORE, THE PD FURTHERS THE INTENT OF THE
22:05:43 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
22:05:46 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:05:48 AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE REVISIONS ON
22:05:51 THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE
22:05:55 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES FIND THE PROPOSED PLAN
22:05:58 DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE
22:06:01 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
22:06:03 THANK YOU, AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME
22:06:06 KNOW.
22:06:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:06:09 LaCHONE.
22:06:09 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU.
22:06:10 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
22:06:14 IN THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU, ALSO, CAN YOU SEE MY
22:06:17 PowerPoint.
22:06:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.
22:06:23 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM PD TO PD.
22:06:26 THE CURRENT PD IS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
22:06:28 OFFICE USE, AND THEN THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS FOR THE
22:06:31 SAME USE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
22:06:33 WITH THIS REQUEST, WHAT IS PROVIDED IS THE PREVIOUSLY
22:06:37 APPROVED WAIVERS, AS ARE NORMALLY LISTED.
22:06:42 THESE ARE WAIVERS APPROVED UNDER THE CURRENT APPROVAL,
22:06:45 WHICH WAS APPROVED IN 2017.
22:06:46 REZ 17-61.
22:06:48 IF THERE WERE THREE WAIVERS GRANTED, ONE IS SPECIAL
22:06:52 STREET SETBACK, THE OTHER IS TO REDUCE THE BACKUP
22:06:56 DISTANCE.
22:06:56 THE THIRD WAIVER WAS REGARDING THE USE TO USE BUFFER AND
22:07:00 THAT WAS ON THE EAST AND THE SOUTH.
22:07:02 SO THE NEW WAIVER IS A SLIGHT AMENDMENT OF THE USE-TO-USE
22:07:08 BUFFER THAT WAS GRANTED FOR THE EAST AND THE SOUTH.
22:07:10 ALONG THE EAST IT WOULD REDUCE TO FOUR FEET WITH SIX-FOOT
22:07:14 FENCE AND THEN TO THREE FEET WITH A SIX-FOOT FENCE TO THE
22:07:16 SOUTH.
22:07:17 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A 3,752 SQUARE FOOT
22:07:24 STRUCTURE WITH THE USE OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
22:07:27 THE SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 7,500 SQUARE FEET.
22:07:32 AS I MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY APPROVED FOR A
22:07:35 PD UNDER REZ 17-61.
22:07:38 AND IT IS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
22:07:41 THAT WAS APPROVED WITH A TWO-STORY, 3,333-SQUARE-FOOT
22:07:48 BUILDING.
22:07:48 THAT PD WAS NOT DEVELOPED.
22:07:50 THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT, AS YOU'LL SEE IN SOME OF
22:07:53 THE SITE PHOTOS THAT I'LL SHOW YOU MOMENTARILY.
22:07:55 THE APPLICANT IS NOW PROPOSING A 3,752-SQUARE-FOOT
22:08:00 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING.
22:08:02 IT WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE
22:08:06 WITH GROUND FLOOR PARKING.
22:08:07 THE PROPOSED USE REQUIRES 13 PARKING SPACES AND 13 SPACES
22:08:12 ARE PROVIDED.
22:08:13 THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 10 FEET, THE WEST
22:08:17 NINE FEET, THE SOUTH AND EAST FOUR FEET.
22:08:19 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 45 FEET, AND
22:08:25 I'LL SHOW YOU AN AERIAL MAP WITH THE LOCATION OF THE
22:08:28 SITE, AND AS DAVID HAS MENTIONED, THE SITE IS SURROUNDED
22:08:31 WITH PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES.
22:08:34 TO THE NORTH, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE RS 50
22:08:38 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH.
22:08:40 AND THEN A VACANT LOT RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND THE ZONING,
22:08:45 RO ZONING DISTRICT TO THE WEST.
22:08:47 SO THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
22:08:49 THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED, IN THE CENTER
22:08:55 OF THE SCREEN.
22:08:56 ON THIS MAP JUST TO ORIENT YOU, THIS IS DALE MABRY
22:08:59 HIGHWAY TO THE WEST, AND THIS IS WEST SAN PEDRO STREET,
22:09:04 WHICH IS WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED.
22:09:07 TO THE SOUTH IS OBISPO, AND THEN THIS IS THE PD.
22:09:13 AS YOU CAN SEE NORTH OF IT IS THE PD FOR THE BUSINESS
22:09:15 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH MOSTLY COMMERCIAL RUNNING ALONG
22:09:18 SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY IN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE RS 50
22:09:22 LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE.
22:09:23 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE REQUEST.
22:09:28 SO THIS IS SAN PEDRO STREET.
22:09:31 THIS IS DALE MABRY HIGHWAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE.
22:09:35 AND YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROPOSED ON SAN PEDRO
22:09:40 STREET AND THIS IS THE OUTLINE OF WHAT WOULD BE THE
22:09:44 BUILDING PLACEMENT.
22:09:45 THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED.
22:09:50 THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION THAT IS ON THE LEFT, AND THIS
22:09:53 IS THE WEST ELEVATION.
22:09:59 THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION ON THE LEFT, AND THEN THIS IS
22:10:02 THE EAST ELEVATION THAT IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
22:10:07 SO HERE ARE PHOTOS OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA.
22:10:14 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE SITE.
22:10:16 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
22:10:20 ON THE LEFT, THIS IS A PICTURE WEST OF THE SITE, AND THEN
22:10:28 A PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE.
22:10:33 AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS SOUTH OF THE SITE AND
22:10:36 THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
22:10:38 THAT IS ACROSS DALE MABRY.
22:10:40 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
22:10:44 THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
22:10:47 IN THE EVENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE APPLICATION, THE
22:10:51 REPORT OUTLINES ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS WHICH ARE
22:10:54 REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
22:10:57 AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
22:10:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
22:11:00 ALL RIGHT.
22:11:04 MR. MICHELINI.
22:11:05 >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
22:11:06 STEVE MICHELINI.
22:11:07 I'M REPRESENTING MILANA HOMES, AND THIS IS GOING TO BE
22:11:11 THEIR NEW CORPORATE OFFICE.
22:11:13 IT IS A SINGLE USER BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AS
22:11:17 PROPOSED.
22:11:18 AS NOTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF THEY
22:11:22 FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT AND WE'RE ORIENTING THE
22:11:25 IDENTIFICATION OF THE BUILDING TOWARD DALE MABRY.
22:11:31 THE PREVIOUS PD AS STAFF POINTED OUT 3,333 SQUARE FEET,
22:11:35 AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO REPLACE THAT WITH -- REPLACE THAT
22:11:39 PD WITH AN APPROVAL FOR 3,752 SQUARE FEET.
22:11:43 THE PARKING HAS BEEN MET.
22:11:47 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
22:11:48 13 ARE REQUIRED AND 13 ARE BEING PROVIDED.
22:11:51 THERE IS A BUILDING REQUEST FOR IDENTIFICATION, LIKE A
22:11:58 SMALL TOWER AT THE CORNER OF SAN PEDRO AND DALE MABRY.
22:12:03 THAT'S NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED TO THE EXTENT TO WHERE
22:12:06 THOSE -- WHERE THAT ELEMENT IS, SO WE NEED TO CORRECT
22:12:09 THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
22:12:11 BUT IT IS ORIENTED AS AN IDENTIFICATION TOWER ALSO FOR
22:12:17 MECHANICAL AND FOR THE ELEVATOR.
22:12:22 THE SITE IS 7,500 SQUARE FEET, AND AS YOU PROBABLY WILL
22:12:28 RECOGNIZE, THIS IS JUST SOUTH OF BAY TO BAY ON DALE
22:12:31 MABRY.
22:12:31 THESE ARE SMALLER LOTS THAT ARE IDEAL FOR INFILL
22:12:35 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AS
22:12:38 OPPOSED TO RETAIL.
22:12:40 A RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT AT THIS CORNER WOULD INTRODUCE A
22:12:44 LOT OF TRAFFIC INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:12:47 F.D.O.T. WOULD NOT ALLOW AN ACCESS ONTO DALE MABRY, AND
22:12:51 THAT'S WHY OUR ACCESS POINT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IS ON
22:12:56 SAN PEDRO.
22:12:57 ONE OF THE MODIFICATIONS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROPOSING
22:13:02 THAT IS NOT ON THIS CURRENT SITE PLAN HAVING MET WITH ONE
22:13:06 OF THE NEIGHBORS IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST IS AN EIGHT-FOOT
22:13:09 MASONRY WALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.
22:13:16 WE ALSO NEED TO REVISE SOME OF THE INFORMATION PER THE
22:13:21 CITY STAFF THAT'S NOTED IN THEIR CONDITIONS REPORT
22:13:26 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND WE'RE COMMITTING TO
22:13:29 MAKING THOSE REVISIONS.
22:13:30 THE CHALLENGE THAT WE RUN INTO IS HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH
22:13:36 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT FACE MAJOR HIGHWAYS LIKE DALE
22:13:39 MABRY WHEN THEY ARE ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
22:13:42 PROPERTIES.
22:13:44 SO WE'VE STRUGGLED WITH THAT A LITTLE BIT.
22:13:47 WE'VE AGREED TO REORIENT THE ROOF DECK AREA, WHICH WILL
22:13:51 REQUIRE REVISION AS WELL, AND WE'RE COMMITTING TO MAKING
22:13:54 THAT CHANGE.
22:13:55 THE SMALL PARCELS ON DALE MABRY ARE REALLY NOT
22:14:00 WELL-SUITED FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS, AND THIS ONE IS
22:14:04 CONSISTENT AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT FOR BUSINESS
22:14:08 PROFESSIONAL, AND I WILL POINT OUT TO YOU IN THE CRITERIA
22:14:13 REQUIRED FOR US TO MEET THAT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS
22:14:16 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY AND GROUND LEVEL
22:14:19 OF THE BUILDING.
22:14:20 SURFACE LEVEL PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED.
22:14:22 AND THIS DESIGN ALLOWS FOR PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES
22:14:25 LOCATED AROUND THE BOUNDARY AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE.
22:14:29 AND THEN NUMBER 6 IS A SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY
22:14:32 COMMERCIAL USES ON THE NORTH, SOUTHWEST AND A
22:14:35 SINGLE-FAMILY USES ARE ON THE EAST SIDE.
22:14:38 AND AS I SAID, WE'RE SENSITIVE TO THAT ISSUE.
22:14:43 I MET WITH THE OWNER, AND THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY
22:14:46 THAT'S PLANNING TO GO IN THERE ALSO MET WITH HIM.
22:14:51 SO WE'LL BE MAKING THOSE CHANGES IF COUNCIL PROVIDES US
22:14:55 WITH AN APPROVAL BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
22:14:58 THE VEHICULAR ACCESS, AS I MENTIONED, IS ON SAN PEDRO,
22:15:04 AND THAT'S A DIRECT RESULT OF F.D.O.T. NOT ALLOWING US TO
22:15:08 HAVE ACCESS ON DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
22:15:09 THE DESIGN WAS REVIEWED, AND IT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE
22:15:13 CONSISTENT WITH THE CRITERIA THAT'S ESTABLISHED BY THE
22:15:17 CITY, INCLUDING THE WAIVERS AND NOT INJURED THE RIGHTS OF
22:15:22 OTHERS OR THE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED THAT WOULD BE
22:15:25 ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
22:15:26 THE WAIVER IS IN HARMONY AND SERVES GENERAL INTENT AND
22:15:30 PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER, AND ALLOWING THE WAIVER WOULD
22:15:35 RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE.
22:15:39 LET ME GO ON TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT WHERE THEY
22:15:41 FOUND THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN AND
22:15:45 THE POLICIES CONTAINED THEREIN.
22:15:48 THERE ARE A NUMBER, FIRST OF ALL.
22:15:50 LET ME STATE THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER EXAMPLES OF
22:15:52 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICES THAT ABUT RESIDENTIAL
22:15:56 EITHER ON THE EAST OR WEST SIDES ALONG THIS ENTIRE
22:15:59 STRETCH OF DALE MABRY.
22:16:00 COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND
22:16:04 I'M GOING TO READ A COUPLE OF THE OBJECTIVES.
22:16:06 THEY ARE IN YOUR REPORT, SO WE'D LIKE TO ASK THAT THEY BE
22:16:10 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.
22:16:12 YOU HAVE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 1.1 IS TO CREATE THE URBAN
22:16:16 DESIGN WHICH RESPECTS THE TAMPA HUMAN SCALE AND UNIQUE
22:16:19 HISTORIC AND AESTHETICS OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.
22:16:23 RELATE NEW BUILDINGS AND DEVELOPMENT TO THE CONTEXT OF
22:16:25 THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:16:26 WE BELIEVE THAT WE'VE DONE THAT AND WE WILL IMPROVE THAT
22:16:29 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING BY DEFINING THOSE AREAS
22:16:33 THAT ARE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND PROMOTE
22:16:37 THAT PRIVACY THAT WE'VE COMMITTED TO.
22:16:40 PROMOTE A RANGE OF USES NEXT TO EACH OTHER WHICH ARE
22:16:44 COMPATIBLE DIRECTLY ACROSS TO THE NORTH IS ANOTHER
22:16:47 BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WHICH IS A CONTRACTOR'S
22:16:50 OFFICE.
22:16:51 THE SAME AS WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE.
22:16:54 THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE PLANNED FOR
22:16:58 NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN A MANNER THAT ARE SENSITIVE AND
22:17:02 COMPATIBLE.
22:17:02 WE BELIEVE WE'RE TAKING MEASURES WHICH WILL MITIGATE ANY
22:17:05 ADVERSE OR POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT
22:17:09 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE EAST.
22:17:11 THESE ARE MORE OF THE POLICIES, 15.2.4 REQUIRE THE
22:17:19 APPROPRIATE BUFFERING, AND WITH THE DISCUSSIONS TO THE
22:17:22 PROPERTY OWNER ON THE EAST SIDE, WE OFFERED A 10-FOOT
22:17:26 MASONRY WALL.
22:17:27 HE WANTED AN EIGHT FOOT WALL, SO WE'RE COMMITTING TO
22:17:29 THAT.
22:17:30 ANYWAY, WE MET THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AS ESTABLISHED IN
22:17:36 BOTH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY OF TAMPA CODES
22:17:40 AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS.
22:17:43 WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE'RE CREATING AN ADVERSE
22:17:45 CONDITION BY PROPOSING A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AT THIS
22:17:49 LOCATION.
22:17:50 INDEED, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF EXAMPLES WHICH AS STAFF
22:17:53 POINTED OUT TO YOU UP AND DOWN THIS PORTION OF DALE
22:17:55 MABRY, AND WE BELIEVE THAT A BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
22:17:58 OFFICE IS A MUCH MORE COMPATIBLE AND APPROPRIATE USE AS
22:18:02 OPPOSED TO A RETAIL USE WHICH YOU HAVE A LITTLE BIT
22:18:05 FURTHER TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY.
22:18:09 SO, ANYWAY, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
22:18:12 AS I SAID, WE HAVE SOME REVISIONS TO MAKE BETWEEN FIRST
22:18:16 AND SECOND READING, INCLUDING THE ORIENTATION OF THE ROOF
22:18:20 DECK, THE LOCATION AND THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
22:18:24 45-FOOT PROVISION.
22:18:26 THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING IS AT 35 PLUS, WHICH IS
22:18:30 ABOUT 36 FEET, WHICH IS NORMALLY THE SAME HEIGHT AS A
22:18:35 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.
22:18:38 AND AS I SAID, WE'RE COMMITTING TO MAKING THE CHANGES AS
22:18:42 REQUESTED BY STAFF.
22:18:44 WE'VE ALSO COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT THE NEIGHBORS
22:18:47 WERE AWARE OF WHAT THOSE CHANGES WERE, AND BEFORE GOING
22:18:51 TO SECOND READING, WE'LL BE PRESENTING THOSE CHANGES TO
22:18:53 THEM FOR THEIR REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION.
22:18:56 I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
22:19:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS
22:19:03 TIME?
22:19:04 ALL RIGHT.
22:19:05 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON
22:19:07 ITEM NUMBER 9?
22:19:08 ANYBODY IN PERSON?
22:19:15 >> THIS IS AILEEN ROSARIO FROM REDEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH
22:19:17 MANAGEMENT.
22:19:18 THERE ARE TWO PEOPLE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
22:19:21 THANK YOU.
22:19:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
22:19:22 COME ON UP IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9.
22:19:25 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
22:19:28 WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.
22:19:29 >> I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
22:19:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
22:19:30 YOU'RE GOOD.
22:19:32 >> MARK ODOM, I LIVE DIRECTLY EAST NEXT TO THE BUILDING.
22:19:38 SO I'M VERY HAPPY THAT THIS PROPERTY IS GETTING BUILT
22:19:43 HERE, BUT THE ONE THING THAT'S BOTHERING ME A LITTLE BIT
22:19:46 IS I JUST HAD A POOL PUT IN.
22:19:49 AND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OTHER BUILDINGS ACROSS THE
22:19:54 STREET, YOU KNOW, WITH THE HEIGHT AND THINGS OF THAT
22:19:56 NATURE, IT JUST CONCERNS ME A LITTLE BIT THAT THE SIDE
22:20:02 WHERE MY POOL IS FACING IS 35-FOOT IN THE AIR, 36-FOOT IN
22:20:07 THE AIR.
22:20:07 THE FRONT, LIKE THEY SHOWED YOU IN THE PROPOSAL IS
22:20:10 45-FOOT IN THE FRONT BUT WHERE MY PROPERTY IS, IT'S
22:20:14 36-FOOT I BELIEVE IS WHAT HE SAID.
22:20:17 THAT CONCERNS ME.
22:20:20 WE DIDN'T PAY TO HAVE THE CAGE PUT OVER THE POOL FOR
22:20:24 SHADE BECAUSE WE LIKE THE SUN.
22:20:25 WE WANTED TO SUN.
22:20:26 IN THIS CASE HERE, THIS IS GOING TO KNOCK MY SUNLIGHT
22:20:30 OUT.
22:20:30 AND THAT'S THE ONE THING THAT I HAVE CONCERNS.
22:20:33 JUST THE LITTLE BIT OF CONSISTENCY HERE WITH EXACTLY WHAT
22:20:36 IS ACROSS THE STREET AND WHAT HAS BEEN BUILT, THAT'S THE
22:20:40 PROBLEM I HAVE.
22:20:41 OTHER THAN THAT, I'M GOOD WITH THIS.
22:20:43 THANK YOU.
22:20:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:20:44 NEXT SPEAKER.
22:20:52 SANITIZE THAT LECTERN.
22:20:57 GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:21:11 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
22:21:12 PHIL SCHLOZNICKEL.
22:21:14 I'VE GOT A PRESENTATION ON MY LAPTOP HERE, SO I WANT TO
22:21:18 SHOW THAT TO YOU.
22:21:19 CAN YOU GUYS SEE THAT?
22:21:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN.
22:21:27 >> ALL RIGHT.
22:21:27 AS WAS SHOWN PRIOR, THIS IS THE GENERAL VIEW OF THE
22:21:31 INTERSECTION HERE, SAN PEDRO AND DALE MABRY, LOOKING
22:21:34 NORTH ON DALE MABRY, YOU'VE GOT TERRA LAWN HOMES ON THE
22:21:38 LEFT.
22:21:38 THAT IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION.
22:21:40 TB HOMES ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER, AND THIS IS MY HOUSE
22:21:44 OVER HERE IN THE SHADOW OF THE TREE HERE.
22:21:49 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT IS RIGHT
22:21:51 HERE ON THIS SOUTHEAST CORNER.
22:21:54 AS YOU CAN SEE -- WELL, MY WIFE AND I HAVE LIVED HERE
22:21:58 COMING UP ON 22 YEARS.
22:22:00 WHEN WE FIRST MOVED HERE, THIS WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE.
22:22:02 IT WAS ACTUALLY NEIL BARTLEY REALTY.
22:22:05 THIS WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT
22:22:07 EVENTUALLY BECAME A RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND THEN WAS TORN
22:22:10 DOWN AND BECAME -- THESE ARE BOTH PDs, TWO-STORY
22:22:14 OFFICES, PARKING ON THE GROUND FLOOR, OFFICE ON THE
22:22:17 SECOND FLOOR.
22:22:17 THIS IS WHAT'S PROPOSED.
22:22:22 FULL THREE-STORY WITH A PARTIAL FOUR-STORY 45 FEET TALL.
22:22:25 THIS IS KIND OF A GENERAL FEEL FOR WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING
22:22:31 AT.
22:22:32 AGAIN, I LIVE HERE.
22:22:33 MARK, WHO JUST SPOKE, LIVES HERE.
22:22:34 WE'VE GOT -- THE GREEN ARE OFFICES.
22:22:38 ONE- AND TWO-STORY OFFICES.
22:22:40 THESE ARE TWO STORY OFFICES.
22:22:43 EVERYTHING AROUND IT, THIS ONE STORY SINGLE-FAMILY
22:22:45 RESIDENCE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE HERE.
22:22:48 MARK'S HOUSE IS 18 FEET TO THE RIDGE OF HIS ROOF.
22:22:50 AGAIN, THIS IS PROPOSED TO BE 36 TO 45 FEET TALL.
22:22:54 JUST FOR PERSPECTIVE PURPOSES.
22:22:57 AGAIN, HERE'S KIND OF A GENERAL LAYOUT OF THE FOUR
22:23:02 PROPERTIES AT THE CORNER.
22:23:04 THIS ONE IS STILL A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
22:23:07 130 FEET WIDE.
22:23:08 THIS ONE IS TERRA LAWN HOMES, 105 FEET HOME.
22:23:11 TB HOMES 80 FEET HOME.
22:23:14 SUBJECT PROPERTY ONLY 75 FEET WIDE.
22:23:16 YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED FOOTPRINT, 4217 SQUARE FEET,
22:23:20 LARGER THAN THIS ONE, WHICH IS ON A BIGGER LOT, ALMOST AS
22:23:23 BIG AS THIS ONE.
22:23:24 AND YOU CAN SEE THE SETBACKS AND THE BUFFERS, JUST VERY
22:23:28 MINIMAL.
22:23:28 HERE'S, AS MR. MICHELINI ADDED, THIS WAS INITIALLY GOING
22:23:33 TO BE A FOUR-FOOT BUFFER.
22:23:36 I MET WITH OWNER OF MILANA HOMES LAST NIGHT.
22:23:40 HE SAID IT WOULD BE MOVED FOUR FEET TO THE WEST, RATHER,
22:23:44 THREE FEET TO THE NORTH, WHICH WOULD GIVE YOU A FIVE-FOOT
22:23:47 SETBACK BETWEEN THE DALE MABRY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE
22:23:51 BUILDING.
22:23:52 SO I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE LINE OF SIGHT HERE.
22:23:54 WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH -- WE'VE ALREADY SEEN OUR FAIR
22:23:58 SHARE OF ACCIDENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION, AND I THINK THAT
22:24:00 WOULD BE DANGEROUS THERE.
22:24:02 JUST FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE 15-FOOT
22:24:07 SETBACK FROM THE DALE MABRY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
22:24:10 15-FOOT BUFFER ON THE SOUTH AND EAST SIDES.
22:24:14 THAT WOULD BE -- WITH NO WAIVERS REQUIRED, THE GREEN AREA
22:24:20 THERE, WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED IS A LITTLE MORE THAN ONE
22:24:22 AND A HALF TIMES WHAT WOULD BE REQUIRED WITHOUT THE
22:24:26 WAIVERS.
22:24:27 THIS IS WHAT HAS BEEN -- WHAT WAS PROVIDED TO ME ACTUALLY
22:24:33 LAST NIGHT, 4235 SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS A FAR VALUE OF
22:24:40 0.56, WHICH IS BIGGER THAN THE OTHER ADJACENT OFFICE
22:24:43 BUILDINGS.
22:24:44 WHAT IS MOST CRITICAL IS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
22:24:46 ALLOWED.
22:24:47 35 FEET.
22:24:49 THEY WANT TO GO 45 FEET, AND NOT ONLY 45 FEET WITH A
22:24:54 PITCHED ROOF BUT VERTICAL.
22:24:55 SO SHEER VERTICAL.
22:24:57 COMPARED TO THE OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE OWNER CORNERS,
22:25:00 YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE THERE.
22:25:01 THIS KIND OF SILHOUETTE OF THE PROPERTY NEXT TO MINE,
22:25:07 WHICH I BELIEVE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN THE BACKGROUND
22:25:10 THERE, BUT THERE IS NO BUILDING THAT BIG IN THE AREA.
22:25:13 THIS WOULD BE BY FAR, BY FAR THE TALLEST BUILDING IN THE
22:25:18 WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:25:19 AND REALLY STICK OUT.
22:25:21 IT'S NOT CONSISTENT AT ALL WITH THE OTHER BUILDINGS.
22:25:24 WHAT YOU'RE SEEING HERE IS PROBABLY ABOUT 25 FEET.
22:25:27 BECAUSE YOU DON'T SEE THE PEAK OF THE ROOF.
22:25:30 ALL YOU SEE IS THE GUTTER LINE, THE EDGE OF THE ROOF.
22:25:33 SO IMAGINE STANDING ON SAN PEDRO, HERE IS THE ONE ON THE
22:25:39 NORTH SIDE, THE EXISTING BUILDING.
22:25:40 THIS IS WHAT'S PROPOSED.
22:25:41 YOU CAN SEE HOW MUCH HIGHER IT IS.
22:25:43 NOW, ON DALE MABRY, THEY ARE PUTTING IT FIVE FEET OFF OF
22:25:47 THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS GOING TO BE EXTREMELY TALL,
22:25:50 EXTREMELY TALL, RELATIVELY SPEAKING.
22:25:52 AND WHEN I TALKED TO MR. LUM LAST WEEK AND THEN TO
22:25:57 BRANDON LANCEY LAST NIGHT ABOUT THE 45-FOOT HEIGHT, THEY
22:26:02 REFERENCED A CG ZONING, BUT THIS LOT IS TOO SMALL TO
22:26:07 QUALIFY FOR A CG ZONING, AND THE FAR IS TOO GREAT.
22:26:11 SO I WOULD JUST ASK THAT AS CITY COUNCIL HAS DONE IN THE
22:26:16 PAST, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, MANISCALCO, AND MIRANDA,
22:26:21 THIS WAS INITIALLY PROPOSED AS A THREE-STORY BUILDING
22:26:24 WITH A FLAT ROOF.
22:26:26 YOU GUYS MADE THE RIGHT DECISION BY RECOMMENDING THAT IT
22:26:29 BE REDUCED TO A TWO-STORY BUILDING WITH A PITCHED ROOF
22:26:33 LIKE THIS.
22:26:33 IT'S A LOT BETTER LOOKING AT THAT THAN IT WOULD BE A
22:26:38 THREE STORY BUILDING AND IN MR. ODOM'S CASE, FOUR STORY,
22:26:44 SHEER WALL 45 FEET TALL.
22:26:47 I WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL, RECOMMEND THAT THE BUILDING BE
22:26:52 MODIFIED, THE PROPOSED BUILDING BE MODIFIED TO MATCH
22:26:55 THESE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
22:26:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:27:00 ANYBODY ELSE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT?
22:27:04 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9?
22:27:11 >>THE CLERK: WE DID, BUT THEY APPEARED IN PERSON.
22:27:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
22:27:14 VERY GOOD.
22:27:15 ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS BEFORE WE
22:27:19 GO TO REBUTTAL?
22:27:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE DON'T HAVE A PHOTO THE GENTLEMAN JUST
22:27:31 HAD?
22:27:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT WAS A LAPTOP.
22:27:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: COUNCILMAN GUDES, WERE YOU DONE?
22:27:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: [INAUDIBLE]
22:27:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN LOOKING AT THIS, I REALIZE THAT
22:27:54 THERE WAS A PD ON THERE ALREADY.
22:27:57 SO, CLEARLY, A PD OFFICE IS THE APPROPRIATE USE FOR THIS
22:28:02 LOCATION.
22:28:03 THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT, STEVEN, BUT WHEN I WAS
22:28:06 LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN, IT DID JUMP OUT AT ME AS 45
22:28:12 FEET.
22:28:13 AND AS WE KNOW, 35 FEET IS TYPICAL FOR ALL THE
22:28:20 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN THE
22:28:22 NEIGHBORHOOD, AND MOST, AT LEAST AS FAR AS THE TESTIMONY
22:28:27 WE JUST HEARD, UP AND DOWN DALE MABRY, EVEN WHEN IT IS
22:28:31 OFFICE, IT'S STILL -- IT STILL SEEMS TO BE LIMITED TO 35
22:28:41 FEET.
22:28:41 I KNOW THAT YOUR CLIENT, A LOT OF GOOD PEOPLE DON'T HAVE
22:28:47 A PROBLEM WITH THAT AT ALL BUT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT
22:28:50 THE NECESSITY IS FOR THE 45 FEET.
22:28:52 AND, FRANKLY, PRETTY PERSUASIVE ARGUMENT FROM THE
22:28:56 GENTLEMAN CATTY-CORNER ACROSS THE STREET THERE.
22:29:01 THE OTHER QUESTION I HAD IS TO TRANSPORTATION.
22:29:04 I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY IS STILL WITH US.
22:29:09 IS MR. SCOTT STILL WITH US?
22:29:13 >> YEAH, I'M STILL HERE.
22:29:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I CAN'T SEE YOU, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF
22:29:19 THAT BOTHERS MR. SHELBY OR NOT.
22:29:24 >> WE COULD CHANGE IT FROM THE MONITOR TO THE GO TO
22:29:29 MEETING.
22:29:29 BE ABLE TO SEE HIM.
22:29:33 IN THE CONTROL ROOM, IF YOU CAN CHANGE OUT THE COUNCIL
22:29:35 MONITOR.
22:29:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF WE CAN SEE THE OTHER GENTLEMAN.
22:29:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW MR. SHELBY LIKES US TO SEE
22:29:44 PEOPLE WHO ARE TESTIFYING.
22:29:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU'RE TALKING TO JONATHAN SCOTT.
22:29:49 IF WE CAN PULL UP MR. SCOTT'S SCREEN.
22:29:52 THERE WE ARE.
22:29:53 THANK YOU.
22:29:54 >> CAN YOU SEE ME NOW?
22:29:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HEY, JONATHAN.
22:29:57 THE QUESTION WAS RAISED BY THE NEIGHBOR ABOUT THE SITE
22:30:07 LINE AND THEIR REQUEST TO COME FIVE FEET WITHIN THE
22:30:10 PROPERTY LINE ON THE DALE MABRY SIDE.
22:30:13 DOES THAT GIVE YOU ANY CONCERN IN TERMS OF VISIBILITY
22:30:19 COMING OUT OF THAT SIDE STREET?
22:30:25 >> THEY ARE FAR ENOUGH OVER.
22:30:27 WE TYPICALLY LOOK AT THAT IN OUR REVIEW.
22:30:32 14 FEET BACK AS YOU TRAVEL THAT STOP SIGN AND THEY ARE
22:30:34 WELL FARTHER -- CLOSER BY 20 FEET.
22:30:38 NOT A SITE OBSTRUCTION -- NOT A SIGHT OBSTRUCTION FOR
22:30:42 VEHICLES.
22:30:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU EVALUATED THE SIGHT TRIANGLE AND
22:30:45 ALL THAT.
22:30:45 >> OH, ABSOLUTELY.
22:30:46 WE HAD THEM PUT A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN TO NOT PUT ANY
22:30:51 LANDSCAPING THERE, TOO, THAT MIGHT CAUSE SIGHT
22:30:54 OBSTRUCTION.
22:30:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, JONATHAN.
22:31:01 THE HEIGHT QUESTION REALLY FALLS BACK TO YOU, MR.
22:31:04 MICHELINI.
22:31:05 WHAT IS THE NECESSITY TO ADD THAT ADDITIONAL TEN FEET
22:31:09 THAT SEEMS TO BE A BIT OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE REST OF
22:31:12 THE SURROUNDING.
22:31:16 >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. DINGFELDER, WHAT WE HAVE TO DO,
22:31:19 AND THIS WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT THE NEIGHBORS
22:31:21 RAISED.
22:31:21 OBVIOUSLY, THEY RAISED IT AGAIN THIS EVENING.
22:31:25 THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO RAISED THIS ISSUE AS WELL AS
22:31:27 CITY STAFF.
22:31:28 AND WHAT WE WERE PROPOSING TO DO AND WHAT WE'VE BEEN
22:31:32 ASKED TO DO WAS TO LOCATE THAT 45 FEET STRUCTURE MORE
22:31:36 CLEARLY ON THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
22:31:39 READING.
22:31:40 THE CONCEPT WAS TO PUSH IT TOWARD DALE MABRY SO THAT IT
22:31:44 WAS AN IDENTIFICATION, AN ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE, AND IT
22:31:49 ALSO WAS DESIGNED TO HIDE THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND
22:31:52 MOVING IT AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE AND PUSHING IT
22:31:56 OVER TOWARD DALE MABRY.
22:31:58 SO THAT WAS THE CONCEPT.
22:32:02 AND WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESS, WE REVISED
22:32:05 THE SITE PLAN, BUT WE WERE INSIDE THE 14 DAYS.
22:32:12 SO YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO SEE IT.
22:32:15 AT LEAST NOT BEEN ABLE TO BE PRESENTED TO YOU AT THIS
22:32:18 POINT.
22:32:19 BUT WE WERE MAKING THOSE MODIFICATIONS, AND I DON'T KNOW
22:32:21 IF YOU WERE MONITORING THE TESTIMONY WHEN YOU WERE IN THE
22:32:24 OTHER ROOM, BUT THERE WERE OTHER THINGS THAT WE COMMITTED
22:32:27 TO THAT ARE NOT ON THE SITE PLAN LIKE THE EIGHT FOOT
22:32:30 MASONRY WALL, TRYING TO ORIENT THE BUILDING AND THE
22:32:35 ROOFTOP SO THAT IT DID NOT DISTURB THE RESIDENCES ON THE
22:32:39 EAST SIDE.
22:32:40 THE LAST SPEAKER IS NOT THE ONE MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED.
22:32:45 IF YOU LOOK AT THE OVERHEAD, HIS PROPERTY IS OVER HERE.
22:32:51 MR. ODOM IS HERE, AND MR. ODOM IS THE ONE WHO WE WERE
22:32:55 WORKING WITH VERY CLOSELY.
22:32:58 AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE AERIAL, THE OTHER CORNERS ALL
22:33:02 HAVE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
22:33:05 I THINK THEY ARE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN 35 FEET, BUT
22:33:08 THEY ARE NOT 45.
22:33:09 I UNDERSTAND THAT.
22:33:10 SO WE CAN GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARDS, AND IF YOU'RE
22:33:15 WILLING TO GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY ON FIRST READING TO
22:33:18 COME BACK WITH A REVISED PLAN THAT CLEARLY SHOWS WHERE
22:33:23 THOSE DEFINED AREAS ARE FOR HEIGHT AND ALSO INCORPORATE
22:33:28 THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE WAIVERS AND THE
22:33:32 REQUESTED CHANGES THAT THEY HAVE AND ALSO TO ADD THE
22:33:36 OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT WE'VE MADE TO THE NEIGHBORS AS
22:33:39 RECENTLY AS YESTERDAY.
22:33:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST ONE FOLLOW-UP QUESTION, MR.
22:33:43 CHAIRMAN.
22:33:44 MR. MICHELINI, DO YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATE ON HOW MANY SQUARE
22:33:52 FEET OR EVEN LINEAR FEET COMING OFF OF DALE MABRY YOUR
22:33:57 40-FOOT APPENDAGE WOULD ULTIMATELY BE?
22:34:03 ARE YOU FOLLOWING ME?
22:34:04 ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JUST A LITTLE TEN-FOOT SECTION
22:34:08 THAT'S GOING TO BE 45 FEET AND THEN THE REST OF THE WIDTH
22:34:13 OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE 35 OR WHAT?
22:34:19 HALF AND HALF?
22:34:20 THE DRAWING I SEE RIGHT NOW LOOKS LIKE IT'S ABOUT HALF
22:34:22 AND HALF.
22:34:23 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YEAH, THE DRAWING NEEDS TO BE FIXED.
22:34:25 WE WERE THINKING ABOUT 30 FEET ALONG SAN PEDRO, AND THEN
22:34:30 THE FRONTAGE OF DALE MABRY.
22:34:32 AND THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH TO INCORPORATE THE MECHANICAL,
22:34:37 ALL OF THE STAIRWELL ACCESSES THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE.
22:34:41 BUT AS I COMMITTED TO THE NEIGHBORS IN OUR DISCUSSIONS
22:34:44 THIS EVENING, IT WASN'T INTENDED TO GO ALL THE WAY DOWN
22:34:48 SAN PEDRO TO OBSTRUCT ANYTHING DOWN THERE.
22:34:51 AND MR. ODOM WAS CONCERNED ABOUT BLOCKING THE SUNLIGHT ON
22:34:55 THE BACK SIDE.
22:34:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A CONTINUANCE SO YOU
22:35:00 CAN REFINE IT AND COME BACK FOR FIRST READING.
22:35:03 I'M SURE MR. SHELBY IS GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF
22:35:05 HEARTBURN IF WE LEAVE IT SO VAGUE BETWEEN FIRST AND
22:35:09 SECOND READING.
22:35:10 AS A MATTER OF FACT, HE'S NODDING IN FRONT OF ME.
22:35:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT'S A QUESTION FOR LaCHONE DOCK, I
22:35:16 THINK IS APPROPRIATE.
22:35:17 THAT WOULD BE MY ADVICE.
22:35:18 I DO HAVE THAT CONCERN.
22:35:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OTHERWISE, I'M OKAY WITH IT.
22:35:23 >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT
22:35:25 COORDINATION.
22:35:25 THE CHANGES WHICH ARE PROPOSED COULD REQUIRE HIM TO COME
22:35:30 BACK FOR FIRST READING AGAIN.
22:35:32 IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AMENDING THE HEIGHT, YOU HAVE THE
22:35:36 WALL PLACEMENT.
22:35:37 THESE ARE CHANGES WHICH WOULD NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE
22:35:40 REVIEWING STAFF, AND THEN BROUGHT BACK BEFORE COUNCIL FOR
22:35:46 FIRST READING AGAIN.
22:35:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: JUST LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN AND
22:35:53 VIEWING SOME OF THE VISUAL PHOTOS, WHAT I SEE, THIS IS
22:36:00 WAY OUT OF THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:36:02 SO I'M HOPING THAT MR. MICHELINI WOULD BE INCLINED TO GET
22:36:07 WITH HIS CLIENT AND COME BACK WITH A CONTINUANCE.
22:36:10 AGAIN, THAT'S ON HIM.
22:36:13 FROM WHAT I CAN SEE RIGHT NOW, IT DOESN'T LOOK THAT THIS
22:36:18 PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:36:20 SO I WOULD ASK THAT MR. MICHELINI THINK ABOUT THAT
22:36:24 CONTINUANCE.
22:36:26 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD SAY,
22:36:28 COUNCILMAN, IS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE BUFFERING
22:36:33 SIDE, AND THE MAIN CONCERN HERE IS THAT IT IS A DALE
22:36:37 MABRY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR.
22:36:39 NOW, WE CAN WORK ON THE OTHER ISSUES.
22:36:42 IF THE COUNCIL WISHES FOR US -- I MEAN, WE WOULD CONSIDER
22:36:46 A CONTINUANCE TO WORK OUT THESE VARIOUS DESIGN ISSUES
22:36:51 RELATED TO THE PROPERTY.
22:36:53 BUT THE USE IS DEFINITELY COMPATIBLE.
22:36:56 THE LOCATION AND HOW WE OPERATE IT IS ALSO COMPATIBLE
22:37:00 WITH EVERYTHING UP AND DOWN DALE MABRY.
22:37:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS 30 DAYS ENOUGH FOR YOU, MR.
22:37:05 MICHELINI, AND FOR STAFF?
22:37:08 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I'D LIKE TO GET BACK IN AS QUICKLY AS
22:37:10 POSSIBLE.
22:37:11 I THINK THEY WOULD HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS, SO 30
22:37:13 DAYS WOULD PROBABLY BE APPROPRIATE.
22:37:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: APRIL 22nd.
22:37:18 IT'S ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE, BUT IT'S A PRETTY LIGHT AGENDA.
22:37:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED.
22:37:25 >>LaCHONE DOCK: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, ON APRIL
22:37:28 22nd, THERE ARE SIX CASES TOTAL RIGHT NOW.
22:37:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOUR AB SALES, ONE REZONING, AND ONE
22:37:36 PLAN AMENDMENT.
22:37:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED.
22:37:38 >>STEVE MICHELINI: IF I COULD REQUEST THAT WE GO EARLY IN
22:37:41 THE SESSION, IF THAT'S POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE HAVE
22:37:45 NEIGHBORS THAT ARE INTERESTED IN OUR CHANGES.
22:37:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
22:37:48 WHAT WE'LL DO, WE HAVE THE PLAN AMENDMENT AT 5:01.
22:37:51 AT 6 P.M., WE'LL PUT YOU FIRST ON THE AGENDA.
22:37:54 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
22:37:55 THAT'S APRIL 22.
22:37:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
22:38:00 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:38:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S MY MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:38:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS
22:38:04 ITEM TO APRIL 22nd AT 6 P.M. FIRST ON THE AGENDA WITH
22:38:08 THE 6 P.M. HEARING.
22:38:10 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, SECOND FROM COUNCIL
22:38:13 MEMBER GUDES.
22:38:13 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:38:15 ANY OPPOSED?
22:38:16 GREAT.
22:38:17 >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I COULD HAVE A POINT
22:38:20 OF JUST A PRIVILEGE HERE TO GIVE A SHOUT-OUT TO LaCHONE
22:38:23 DOCK.
22:38:26 SHE IS LEAVING THE CITY.
22:38:28 SHE WILL BE A GREAT LOSS.
22:38:29 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK HER FOR ALL OF HER DEDICATION
22:38:32 AND HARD WORK IN HELPING MAKE THIS A BETTER PLACE TO
22:38:35 LIVE, WORK, AND PLAY.
22:38:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I'LL MAKE A MOTION AT THE END OF THE
22:38:37 MEETING TO GIVE LaCHONE A COMMENDATION NEXT THURSDAY
22:38:41 BECAUSE HER LAST DAY IS THE 16th.
22:38:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE'RE ALL DISAPPOINTED.
22:38:47 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU ALL.
22:38:48 I APPRECIATE IT.
22:38:49 >>STEVE MICHELINI: SHE WILL BE SORELY MISSED AND THANK
22:38:52 HER FOR ALL HER HARD WORK.
22:38:54 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:38:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TWO MORE CASES.
22:38:56 ITEM NUMBER 10.
22:38:59 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.
22:39:00 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
22:39:03 ITEM NUMBER 10 IS REZ 21-19.
22:39:06 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2717 WEST HILLSBOROUGH
22:39:08 AVENUE.
22:39:10 THE APPLICANT IS REPRESENTED BY TRUETT GARDNER.
22:39:13 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM CG TO PD FOR
22:39:18 RETAIL SALES CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE.
22:39:22 I'LL GO AHEAD AND TURN IT OVER TO DAVID HEY.
22:39:24 ONCE HE'S FINISHED, IF I COULD HAVE IT BACK TO COMPLETE
22:39:27 MY REPORT.
22:39:28 THANK YOU.
22:39:34 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
22:39:35 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
22:39:39 HOPEFULLY DO I NOT CUT OUT.
22:39:41 MY COMPUTER IS STARTING TO ACT UP.
22:39:43 I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GETTING TIRED.
22:39:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'VE GOT YOU.
22:39:45 GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:39:46 >>DAVID HEY: IF I DISAPPEAR, THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENED.
22:39:49 THE NEXT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING
22:39:53 DISTRICT AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE -- IN THE PLAZA
22:39:58 TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD.
22:40:00 THE SUBJECT SITE DUE TO THE LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE
22:40:06 CORRIDOR THAT IS ALONG, IT'S WITHIN A MIXED USE AND
22:40:09 TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
22:40:11 THERE'S SPECIFIC POLICY DIRECTION FOR THOSE CORRIDORS IN
22:40:14 THE COMP PLAN.
22:40:16 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT.
22:40:19 THERE IS TRANSIT AVAILABLE ON WEST HILLSBOROUGH.
22:40:22 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
22:40:26 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
22:40:30 THIS IS WEST HILLSBOROUGH.
22:40:32 WE HAVE NORTH HABANA AVENUE, MOHAWK IS TO THE NORTH
22:40:37 BEHIND THE SUBJECT SITE.
22:40:39 THIS IS THE HILLSBOROUGH PLAZA WITH THE PUBLIX IN IT AT
22:40:42 THE CORNER OF HABANA AND HILLSBOROUGH.
22:40:45 YOU COULD SEE THIS PORTION OF HILLSBOROUGH IS HEAVILY
22:40:48 COMMERCIALIZED, ALSO OVER TO THE ARMENIA, THERE'S LOTS OF
22:40:53 COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES ALONG THIS SEGMENT.
22:40:57 ONCE YOU GET -- ONCE YOU GO NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE,
22:41:02 THERE IS SOME MULTIFAMILY, BUT THE PREDOMINANT PATTERN IS
22:41:05 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE NORTH.
22:41:07 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
22:41:13 THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND
22:41:18 WEST ARE ALL IN THAT PINK COLOR.
22:41:20 THAT'S THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35, DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH
22:41:24 IN THAT BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 35.
22:41:27 THAT'S WHERE THAT MULTIFAMILY THAT WE SAW IS, AND THEN
22:41:32 THE TAN IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 10.
22:41:35 OVER ON THE NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE CORRIDOR, THE BRIGHT RED
22:41:39 REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
22:41:42 AGAIN, PARCELS ARE UTILIZED FOR COMMERCIAL USES TO THE
22:41:48 EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST.
22:41:49 SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES FIND THE PROPOSED
22:41:52 USE OF THE SITE CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL EXISTING
22:41:55 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
22:41:57 TYPICALLY WITHIN MIXED USE DISTRICTS, CORRIDORS,
22:42:01 BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC
22:42:04 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PARKING SHALL BE PLACED AT THE REAR OF
22:42:06 THE DEVELOPMENT.
22:42:07 DUE TO THE UNIQUE NATURE OF OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
22:42:10 GAS STATIONS, THERE ARE CHALLENGES WITH PLACING THE
22:42:13 PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE CLOSE TO WEST HILLSBOROUGH
22:42:16 AVENUE AND PARKING AT THE REAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
22:42:18 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
22:42:20 APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED THE MIXED USE CORRIDORS POLICIES
22:42:23 TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY.
22:42:26 PROPOSED PD PROVIDES INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
22:42:29 WITHIN THE SITE TO ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND
22:42:32 ACCESSIBILITY TO THE AMENITIES ON-SITE.
22:42:35 PER LAND USE POLICY 15.2.7, IT DOES ENCOURAGE BUILDINGS
22:42:47 TO BE CONNECTED TO SIDEWALK NETWORKS AND TO PROVIDE SHADE
22:42:56 TREES ALONG PORTIONS OF WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
22:42:59 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WOULD ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT
22:43:01 TO ADDRESS THIS POLICY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE FIRST AND
22:43:04 SECOND READING.
22:43:05 IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS
22:43:08 COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
22:43:10 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
22:43:12 I SHOULD NOTE THE PLAN THAT WE REVIEWED HAD VEHICULAR
22:43:17 ACCESS ON MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY, AND
22:43:26 THAT'S THE ONE THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED.
22:43:29 THERE ARE TWO SITE PLANS WITHIN YOUR PACKET THAT WE SAW.
22:43:33 THE ONLY ONE THAT WE REVIEWED WAS THE ONE THAT HAD THE
22:43:37 ACCESS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY.
22:43:39 THIS PROPOSED PD IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
22:43:45 PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35
22:43:49 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
22:43:50 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
22:43:53 STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED
22:43:56 REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
22:43:59 IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
22:44:02 THANK YOU.
22:44:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:44:04 LaCHONE.
22:44:08 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.
22:44:09 IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
22:44:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST A POINT OF ORDER, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:44:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:44:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
22:44:18 I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED, MR. HEY MADE REFERENCE TO TWO SITE
22:44:23 PLANS.
22:44:23 I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE LOOKING AT THE RIGHT SITE
22:44:27 PLAN.
22:44:29 IF THERE ARE TWO OR HOW THEY DISTINGUISH ONE FROM THE
22:44:33 OTHER?
22:44:33 ARE THEY DATED DIFFERENT?
22:44:36 THERE'S ONLY ONE MOVING -- IS ONLY ONE MOVING FORWARD OR
22:44:41 TWO OF THEM MOVING FORWARD?
22:44:44 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THIS IS LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT
22:44:47 COORDINATION.
22:44:50 LET ME TAKE A LOOK AT THE RECORD AND SEE IF MORE THAN ONE
22:44:53 SITE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
22:44:56 WE TYPICALLY GO WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN
22:44:59 INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR DRC REVIEW.
22:45:04 IS THAT THE SITE PLAN, DAVID, THAT YOU USED, THE ONE
22:45:07 DISCUSSED AT DRC?
22:45:09 >>DAVID HEY: THERE ARE TWO WITHIN THE CITY'S PACKET.
22:45:14 ONE -- I'M LOOKING AT ONE RIGHT NOW.
22:45:17 IT HAS AN ACCESS POINT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARCEL
22:45:20 ONTO MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
22:45:24 THEN THERE'S ANOTHER SITE PLAN, I THINK THESE MAY HAVE
22:45:28 BEEN DONE WITH AUTO TURN WITH TRANSPORTATION.
22:45:32 THIS ONE, IT HAS THE ACCESS FURTHER TO THE WEST ALONG
22:45:36 MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY, AND THAT'S THE
22:45:40 ONE THAT WE HAVE REVIEWED IN THE FILE.
22:45:44 >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO WHAT HAPPENED IS -- LaCHONE DOCK,
22:45:49 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
22:45:49 APPLICANT HAD TO SUBMIT FOR REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION TO
22:45:53 NATURAL RESOURCES.
22:45:54 SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THE ADDITIONAL SITE PLANS.
22:45:58 BUT THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN WOULD BE THE ONE SHOWING THE
22:46:06 EXITS.
22:46:07 BECAUSE ONE IS THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION AND THE
22:46:10 APPLICANT CAN CERTAINLY CONFIRM THE ACCESS POINTS SHOULD
22:46:14 BE TO THE NORTH, THE EAST AND SOUTH.
22:46:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IF AND WHEN
22:46:20 WE APPROVE THE PD SITE PLAN THAT WE KNOW WHICH ONE WE'RE
22:46:24 APPROVING.
22:46:29 >> MR. DINGFELDER, I CAN CLARIFY AND DAVID, I THINK THE
22:46:36 ONE YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS THE ONE THAT HAD THE ACCESS
22:46:38 POINT ON THE EAST SIDE OF MOHAWK ACROSS FROM
22:46:41 SINGLE-FAMILY.
22:46:41 >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT.
22:46:42 >> TALKING TO RYAN THE OTHER DAY, I THINK HE LEFT THAT
22:46:44 ONE IN JUST TO SHOW THE EVOLUTION OF THE SITE PLAN, AND
22:46:48 THAT THE ACCESS POINT HAS BEEN MOVED WEST.
22:46:51 AND TO YOUR POINT, ACROSS FROM THE MULTIFAMILY IN ORDER
22:46:55 TO BE AS SENSITIVE AS POSSIBLE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY
22:46:59 RESIDENTS BEHIND.
22:46:59 JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY.
22:47:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANKS FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
22:47:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LaCHONE, GO AHEAD.
22:47:04 >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, THANK YOU.
22:47:05 LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
22:47:07 SO WITH THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU, THIS PD REQUEST, THERE
22:47:11 ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE WAIVERS REQUESTED.
22:47:13 THREE OF THE WAIVERS ARE RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES,
22:47:16 AND THEN THERE'S A WAIVER THAT IS REQUESTED REGARDING THE
22:47:20 REDUCTION OF THE BUILDING SETBACK ON WEST MOHAWK, AND
22:47:23 THEN THERE'S A WAIVER REQUESTED TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL
22:47:26 TRAFFIC ACCESS TO THE LOCAL STREET, WHICH IS ON MOHAWK
22:47:30 AND TAMPANIA.
22:47:31 AND THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO
22:47:34 CONSTRUCT A 4,745 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE WITH THE PROPOSED
22:47:39 USE OF RETAIL SALES FOR CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE
22:47:43 SALES.
22:47:43 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS 59,759 SQUARE FEET OR 1.37
22:47:49 ACRES.
22:47:50 IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST
22:47:53 HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE AND NORTH HABANA AVENUE.
22:47:56 SO THE SITE ENCOMPASSES THAT ENTIRE BLOCK.
22:47:58 IT'S BOUNDED BY TAMPANIA TO THE WEST, MOHAWK TO THE
22:48:04 NORTH, AND AS DAVID HAS SHOWN YOU, THIS SITE IS
22:48:07 SURROUNDED WITH RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY
22:48:09 USES, AND THEN ALONG THE MAIN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR OF
22:48:13 HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES.
22:48:16 THE VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROPOSED ON MOHAWK AVENUE,
22:48:20 TAMPANIA, AND HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
22:48:24 THE CONVENIENCE STORE WILL BE LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH
22:48:26 SIDE OF THE SITE WITH ACCESSORY CAR WASH PROPOSED ON THE
22:48:30 WEST, SURFACE PARKING SURROUNDING THE BUILDING.
22:48:33 THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST 10
22:48:37 FEET AND TO THE NORTH 8 FEET.
22:48:39 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 23 FEET.
22:48:42 THE PROPOSED USE REQUIRES 29 PARKING SPACES AND 40 SPACES
22:48:47 ARE PROVIDED.
22:48:48 AND THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
22:48:52 AND THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED.
22:48:57 THIS IS HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
22:48:59 AND THEN THIS IS NORTH HABANA AVENUE, WHICH IS WEST ON
22:49:03 THE SITE, AND THIS IS MOHAWK AVENUE.
22:49:05 AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
22:49:15 AND I WANT TO JUST CONFIRM WITH THE APPLICANT, IS THIS
22:49:18 YOUR FINAL SITE PLAN, TRUETT?
22:49:21 >>TRUETT GARDNER: THAT IS CORRECT, YES.
22:49:24 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THIS IS THE SITE PLAN.
22:49:25 HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
22:49:26 HABANA AVENUE ON THE WEST AND MOHAWK AVENUE ON THE NORTH
22:49:29 AND TAMPANIA AVENUE IS ON THE EAST.
22:49:33 SO YOU CAN SEE THE VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS THAT ARE
22:49:35 LOCATED OFF OF MOHAWK.
22:49:40 WITH THE ACCESS POINT ON HILLSBOROUGH BEING THE ENTRANCE
22:49:43 ONLY, AND THEN ON THE EAST, THE TAMPANIA VEHICULAR ACCESS
22:49:48 POINT IS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS.
22:49:50 THE PROPOSED STORE WILL BE LOCATED AT THIS LOCATION
22:49:55 ALMOST CENTER TO THE SITE WITH THE GASOLINE PUMPS LOCATED
22:50:01 HERE ALONG WITH THE CANOPIES.
22:50:03 AND THE PROPOSED CAR WASH WILL BE LOCATED TO THE WEST
22:50:06 SIDE OF THE SITE.
22:50:08 THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS THAT ARE PROPOSED.
22:50:17 THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION, AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM LEFT
22:50:22 IS THE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION, AND THEN ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS
22:50:27 THE FRONT AND THEN THE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION.
22:50:32 AND THEN ALSO WHAT'S BEEN PROVIDED ARE ELEVATIONS FOR THE
22:50:37 ACTUAL CANOPIES LOCATED ON-SITE, AND THEN THE CAR WASH,
22:50:43 THE NORTH, EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST ELEVATIONS.
22:50:47 HERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
22:50:50 SO THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE.
22:50:53 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS AT THE CORNER OF HABANA, AND
22:50:56 THEN THIS IS FURTHER EAST ON THE SITE, THIS VIEW, AND
22:51:03 THIS IS ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, THE PICTURE ON THE
22:51:06 LEFT.
22:51:07 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE
22:51:11 AND THEN ALSO THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
22:51:14 THIS IS ON HABANA.
22:51:16 THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE WEST END OF THE SITE ON
22:51:20 HABANA ON THE LEFT, AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT SHOWS
22:51:24 THE USE WEST OF THE SITE, THE COMMERCIAL USE, WHICH IS AT
22:51:27 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HABANA AND HILLSBOROUGH.
22:51:30 AND THEN WE COME BACK AROUND NORTH OF THE SITE.
22:51:35 THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY IN THE LEFT PICTURE,
22:51:38 AND THEN THE PICTURES TO THE -- THE MIDDLE PICTURE AND
22:51:42 THE RIGHT PICTURE ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS
22:51:46 YOU'RE HEADING EAST.
22:51:47 BUT THESE ARE ALL NORTH OF THE SITE.
22:51:49 THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTHEAST OF THE SITE, A
22:51:54 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE
22:51:56 RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE.
22:52:01 AND THEN THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE ACROSS WEST
22:52:04 HILLSBOROUGH, YOUR COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE LOCATED AND
22:52:08 THE STRIP CENTER AND THEN ON THE OUTPARCELS.
22:52:10 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
22:52:13 REQUEST AND FINDS IT INCONSISTENT WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT
22:52:18 CODE.
22:52:18 PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION.
22:52:21 IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO GRANT THE APPROVAL
22:52:24 AND THE WAIVERS REQUESTED, THERE ARE SITE PLAN
22:52:28 MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND
22:52:30 SECOND READING.
22:52:31 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
22:52:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
22:52:34 MR. GARDNER, IF YOU CAN RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE DIDN'T
22:52:38 SWEAR YOU IN.
22:52:40 >>THE CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH,
22:52:43 THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
22:52:44 >>TRUETT GARDNER: I DO.
22:52:46 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
22:52:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:52:48 >>TRUETT GARDNER: TRUETT GARDNER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
22:52:52 IF I COULD, I'VE GOT A BRIEF VISUAL PRESENTATION, SO I
22:52:57 WANT TO SHARE MY SCREEN.
22:53:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:53:10 >>TRUETT GARDNER: CAN YOU SEE THAT?
22:53:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
22:53:19 >>TRUETT GARDNER: TRUETT GARDNER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
22:53:23 I HAVE THE PLEASURE BEING HERE ON BEHALF OF RKM
22:53:26 DEVELOPMENT.
22:53:27 INTENDED USE AND REQUESTED DENSITY ARE ALREADY PERMITTED
22:53:30 SO THE REZONING LARGELY ADDRESSES SITE CHALLENGES WITH
22:53:33 THIS USE.
22:53:34 I'LL BE BRIEF.
22:53:35 WE'VE SUBMITTED SUPPORTING MEMOS IN ADVANCE OF THE
22:53:38 HEARING.
22:53:38 WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY OPPOSITION.
22:53:40 LASTLY, WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS FROM STAFF, EXCEPT FOR ONE
22:53:44 TECHNICAL OBJECTION, WHICH I'LL ADDRESS.
22:53:46 THIS SLIDE, DAVID AND LaCHONE DID A GREAT JOB OF GOING
22:53:51 THROUGH JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME CONTEXT, THIS IS THE
22:53:55 SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND THEN THESE ARE THE FOUR CORNERS OF
22:53:58 THE QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF HABANA AND
22:54:03 HILLSBOROUGH.
22:54:04 AND THEN, UNFORTUNATELY, THE CHURCH THAT YOU SAW HAS BEEN
22:54:18 ABANDONED AND HAS FALLEN INTO DISREPAIR.
22:54:22 UNFORTUNATELY, NOW IT'S BEING USED REALLY AS A TRASH
22:54:26 DUMP, AS WELL AS A HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT.
22:54:28 SO JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU TRUE FLAVOR FOR WHAT THIS SITE
22:54:33 CURRENTLY IS.
22:54:34 OUR PROPOSAL, AND THIS IS OUR LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE
22:54:37 PLAN IS TO REDEVELOP THE SITE WITH A NEW PROTOTYPE,
22:54:42 7-ELEVEN WITH CO-LOCATED RESTAURANT.
22:54:44 WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH NATURAL RESOURCES ON THE
22:54:48 LANDSCAPING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S THOUGHTFUL AND LUSH
22:54:51 AND ROBUST.
22:54:52 SO THAT'S THE PLAN YOU SEE HERE.
22:54:54 WE DO HAVE FIVE WAIVERS, AND THE ONE THAT I WANTED TO
22:55:00 SPEND TIME WITH IS THE LAST ONE, WHICH IS THE ALLOWANCE
22:55:05 OF COMMERCIAL ACCESS ON LOCAL STREETS.
22:55:10 AND THE AERIAL IMAGE YOU'RE SEEING ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE
22:55:13 OF THE SCREEN WITH THE YELLOW AREAS IS THE CURRENT
22:55:16 CONFIGURATION.
22:55:18 AS YOU'LL NOTE, THERE ARE CURRENTLY SIX ACCESS POINTS,
22:55:21 TWO ON HILLSBOROUGH, ONE ON HABANA, TWO ON THE LOCAL
22:55:25 STREET OF MOHAWK, AND THEN ONE ON TAMPANIA.
22:55:29 WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING WAS LARGELY DICTATED BY F.D.O.T. AND
22:55:35 JUST TO GO THROUGH, FIRST OF ALL, WHAT THEY DICTATED AND
22:55:38 THEN, SECONDLY, WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING, BUT, IN GENERAL, IS
22:55:43 TAKING THE SIX ACCESS POINTS AND REDUCING THEM TO THREE,
22:55:47 ACTUALLY TWO AND A HALF, WHAT F.D.O.T. DICTATED TO US IS
22:55:52 ABSOLUTELY NO ACCESS AT ALL ON HABANA, AND THEN AS IT
22:55:57 RELATES TO HILLSBOROUGH, RIGHT-IN ONLY, BUT NO ABILITY TO
22:56:03 EGRESS FROM THE SITE SO THAT LEFT US WITH NO ALTERNATIVE
22:56:08 OTHER THAN TO HAVE ACCESS ON MOHAWK AND THEN TAMPANIA.
22:56:13 AS YOU SAW FROM THE PICTURE FROM LaCHONE, THE ACCESS
22:56:16 HERE ON TAMPANIA IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM COMMERCIAL
22:56:20 ACCESS.
22:56:20 THIS IS A CRYSTAL FAST FOOD RESTAURANT.
22:56:23 SO IT'S DIRECTLY ALIGNED WITH THAT, WHICH WE THOUGHT WAS
22:56:25 SENSITIVE.
22:56:26 AND THEN AS IT RELATES TO MOHAWK AND AS DAVID WAS
22:56:29 MENTIONING BEFORE, THERE ARE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY
22:56:32 RESIDENCES, ONE WAS HERE, THE OTHER ONE WAS HERE.
22:56:37 SO WHAT WE TRIED TO DO IS MOVE THAT ACCESS POINT AS FAR
22:56:40 WEST AS POSSIBLE TO BE IMMEDIATELY ACROSS FROM THIS
22:56:44 MULTIFAMILY USE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM US ON MOHAWK, WHICH
22:56:47 IS DEEMED TO BE A COMMERCIAL USE.
22:56:51 SO THAT'S THE ONE OBJECTION THAT WE HAD.
22:56:55 WITH THAT, WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY
22:56:57 HAVE.
22:56:57 BUT I JUST WANTED TO COVER THAT ONE LOOSE END.
22:57:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
22:57:01 HEARING NONE, THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, BUT I
22:57:08 WILL ASK, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT IN
22:57:12 PERSON?
22:57:13 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED FOR ITEM NUMBER 10.
22:57:15 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
22:57:18 ITEM.
22:57:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
22:57:21 CITRO.
22:57:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST A COMMENT BEFORE YOU CLOSE.
22:57:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
22:57:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. GARDNER, I JUST WANTED TO -- IT'S
22:57:32 SAD TO SEE ANY CHURCH OR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION GETTING
22:57:36 TORN DOWN, BUT I HAVE NOTICED THAT IT WAS ABANDONED IN
22:57:42 RECENT TIMES.
22:57:50 I WANTED TO COMMEND YOU AND YOUR TEAM ABOUT MOVING THAT
22:57:54 ENTRANCE AND BEING MORE SENSITIVE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY
22:57:58 HOME BEHIND IT.
22:57:59 I THINK MOVING IT OVER TO THE WEST IS THE APPROPRIATE
22:58:02 PLACE TO GO.
22:58:03 SO THANK YOU.
22:58:06 >>TRUETT GARDNER: APPRECIATE IT.
22:58:07 IT WAS A TOUGH SITE TO CONFIGURE BUT THEY DID A GREAT JOB
22:58:10 OF DOING IT.
22:58:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAD A MOTION TO CLOSE AND A
22:58:12 SECOND.
22:58:12 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:58:14 AYE.
22:58:16 >>THE CLERK: WHO WAS THE SECOND.
22:58:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CARLSON.
22:58:19 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
22:58:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, WOULD YOU MIND
22:58:23 READING ITEM NUMBER 10?
22:58:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SURE.
22:58:31 >> JOHN, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
22:58:34 SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU RIGHT BEFORE A GOOD MOTION, BUT
22:58:37 TWO THINGS I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T MENTION.
22:58:40 IN THE STAFF REPORT, WHICH I DID CONFIRM --
22:58:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEED A MOTION TO REOPEN THE
22:58:46 HEARING.
22:58:47 MOTION FOR CITRO TO REOPEN, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
22:58:50 ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
22:58:52 GO AHEAD, SIR.
22:58:53 >>TRUETT GARDNER: I JUST WANTED TO BE COMPLETELY CANDID
22:58:57 AND MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE HERE.
22:58:59 THE STAFF REPORT HAS THE NORTHERN SETBACK OF SIX FEET AND
22:59:02 I KNOW LaCHONE IN HER PRESENTATION MENTIONED IT AS
22:59:07 EIGHT.
22:59:07 I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT IS SIX FEET.
22:59:10 SO THE STAFF REPORT IS CORRECT THERE.
22:59:12 CAN I UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM.
22:59:13 I NOTICED IT TODAY.
22:59:14 THE SITE PLAN AND THE DATA TABLE STATES 8 FEET BUT IT'S
22:59:19 SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS 6 FEET.
22:59:21 I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT, AND THEN SECONDLY, WE HAVE WORKED
22:59:23 WITH NATURAL RESOURCES CURRENTLY THE WAIVER IS TO REMOVE
22:59:27 THREE GRAND OAKS, BUT THAT HAS NOW BEEN REDUCED TO TWO.
22:59:32 JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WERE NO SURPRISES WHEN WE
22:59:34 REVISE THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
22:59:38 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY.
22:59:41 DOES THAT HAVE TO BE NOTATED DURING THE MOTION, MS. DOCK?
22:59:45 OR IS THAT ON THE -- I BELIEVE THAT'S AN ADDITION TO THE
22:59:49 REVISION SHEET, THOSE CORRECTIONS, IS THAT CORRECT?
22:59:51 >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT.
22:59:52 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
22:59:54 THE CHANGES MENTIONED BY THE APPLICANT WOULD BE IN
22:59:56 ADDITION TO THE CHANGES ALREADY REQUESTED TO BE MADE
22:59:59 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
23:00:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THAT COULD BE PART OF THE MOTION,
23:00:03 PLEASE, MR. DINGFELDER.
23:00:04 >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, PLEASE.
23:00:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE.
23:00:07 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
23:00:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:00:09 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
23:00:10 ALL IN FAVOR?
23:00:13 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
23:00:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE IN REGARD
23:00:17 TO REZ 21-19, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
23:00:22 CONSIDERATION.
23:00:23 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
23:00:25 2717 WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
23:00:29 FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM
23:00:32 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL, TO
23:00:35 PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE GOODS,
23:00:39 AND GASOLINE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
23:00:42 AND SPECIFICALLY THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF
23:00:45 PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE
23:00:49 DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN,
23:00:51 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE.
23:00:54 FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT
23:00:57 THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE
23:01:04 SPECIFICALLY I DO BELIEVE THEY COMPLY WITH LAND
23:01:06 DEVELOPMENT CODE 27-136, AND THAT THE WAIVERS COMPLY WITH
23:01:12 27-139 PAREN 4.
23:01:15 MY MOTION WOULD ALSO INCLUDE MAKING THE CHANGES THAT ARE
23:01:20 ON THE STAFF LIST AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL CHANGES
23:01:23 MENTIONED BY MR. GARDNER TONIGHT.
23:01:25 SO MOVED.
23:01:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER
23:01:29 WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
23:01:31 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
23:01:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
23:01:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
23:01:35 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
23:01:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
23:01:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
23:01:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
23:01:40 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
23:01:43 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT
23:01:46 9:30 A.M.
23:01:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT.
23:01:51 ITEM 11.
23:01:54 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
23:01:55 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
23:01:57 THE LAST ITEM FOR THE NIGHT IS REZ 21-20.
23:02:02 THIS IS FOR THE PROJECT AREA WHICH IS BOUNDED BY SPRUCE
23:02:08 TO THE NORTH, SPRUCE STREET, ROME AVENUE TO THE WEST,
23:02:14 NORTH BOULEVARD THE BOUNDARY TO THE EAST AND THEN I-275
23:02:18 IS THE BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTH.
23:02:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, POINT OF ORDER.
23:02:21 JUST SO EVERYBODY CAN GUIDE THEMSELVES ACCORDINGLY, ARE
23:02:27 THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR, ON THE TELEPHONE?
23:02:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOBODY.
23:02:31 JUST THE APPLICANT.
23:02:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WONDERFUL.
23:02:33 JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO BE AWARE OF THAT.
23:02:35 THANK YOU.
23:02:38 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU.
23:02:40 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY.
23:02:42 THE PROJECT AREA FROM NMU, NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35 TO
23:02:46 PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
23:02:48 IT IS TO ALLOW ALL USES ALLOWED IN SECTION 212, TABLE
23:02:53 212.2 WHICH IS THE NMU DISTRICT RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S
23:02:59 GOODS, DRIVE UP ATM, PRIVATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY,
23:03:04 HOTEL WITH A MAXIMUM OF 200 ROOMS, BANK AND BANK WITH
23:03:08 DRIVE-THROUGH ATM.
23:03:09 WHAT I'LL DO NOW IS HAND IT OVER TO DAVID HEY WITH THE
23:03:13 PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND THEN IF YOU
23:03:15 COULD RETURN TO ME AND I WILL COMPLETE MY REPORT.
23:03:17 THANK YOU.
23:03:18 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
23:03:20 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
23:03:22 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
23:03:24 WE END THE EVENING IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
23:03:28 DISTRICT.
23:03:29 THIS IS THE WEST RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
23:03:32 THIS SITE IS SERVED BY HART'S ROUTE 7, WHICH RUNS ALONG
23:03:37 WEST MAIN STREET.
23:03:39 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN TWO EVACUATION ZONES, B AND C,
23:03:46 AND THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS DR. MARTIN
23:03:49 LUTHER KING, JR. RECREATION COMPLEX.
23:03:53 THAT'S LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST OF
23:03:55 THE SUBJECT SITE AND TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
23:03:59 WE HAVE THE JULIAN B. LANE PARK.
23:04:03 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL.
23:04:05 WE SHOULD ALL BE FAMILIAR.
23:04:06 THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD, INTERSTATE 275.
23:04:09 SOME REDEVELOPMENT IS ALREADY OCCURRING IN WHAT USED TO
23:04:14 BE NORTH BOULEVARD HOMES.
23:04:16 THIS IS THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER.
23:04:17 BLAKE HIGH SCHOOL IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST.
23:04:19 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
23:04:24 THIS SALMON COLOR IS THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35
23:04:30 CATEGORY.
23:04:30 THIS IS THE ONLY LOCATION IN THE ENTIRE CITY THAT THE
23:04:34 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35 CATEGORY IS FOUND.
23:04:37 THE BLUE REPRESENTS PUBLIC.
23:04:42 THERE'S TWO SCHOOLS LOCATED HERE IMMEDIATELY TO THE
23:04:48 NORTHWEST, WE HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL 50, AND THEN SOME
23:04:54 RESIDENTIAL 20 IN THE LIGHT BROWN, AND THERE'S SOME
23:04:58 REPRESENTED BY THE RED, THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
23:05:03 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WEST OF THE HILLSBOROUGH
23:05:06 RIVER, WHICH HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AN AREA APPROPRIATE
23:05:09 FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
23:05:11 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO ENCOURAGES A MIX OF USES TO
23:05:14 SUPPORT WALKING AND THE USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT.
23:05:17 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO SEEKS TO PROVIDE RESIDENTIAL
23:05:20 DEVELOPMENT NEAR EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC TRANSIT OPTIONS
23:05:23 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY.
23:05:26 THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN PROXIMITY TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
23:05:29 DISTRICT WITH ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSIT AND WILL FURTHER
23:05:33 THE RELATED POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
23:05:36 PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE HOUSING AND
23:05:39 RETAIL OPTIONS TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S GROWING
23:05:43 POPULATION.
23:05:43 THE CITY OF TAMPA DEVELOPED THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE
23:05:46 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES TO IMPLEMENT THE VISION
23:05:49 OUTLINED IN THE WEST RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
23:05:52 THE CATEGORIES ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIFAMILY
23:05:55 RESIDENTIAL IN NEIGHBORHOOD-SERVING USES.
23:05:59 IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, QUOTE,
23:06:03 NEIGHBORHOODS SERVING, UNQUOTE, HAS BEEN INTERPRETED AS
23:06:06 ALLOWING A MAXIMUM OF COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES.
23:06:10 THOUGH THE CITY INCLUDED THE TERM NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING IN
23:06:13 THE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND USE CATEGORY WHILE CREATING
23:06:17 THE NMU ZONING DISTRICTS, SEVERAL USES TYPICALLY DEEMED
23:06:21 AS COMMERCIAL GENERAL WERE INCLUDED IN THE NMU TABLE OF
23:06:25 USES, WHICH IS IN SECTION 27-212-4 IN THE LAND
23:06:31 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
23:06:32 THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN PROVIDES FOR SEVERAL USES THAT
23:06:35 ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE NMU ZONING DISTRICT, SUCH AS BUT
23:06:39 NOT LIMITED TO THE RETAIL SALES SHOPPER'S GOODS AND
23:06:42 PRIVATE SCHOOLS.
23:06:43 THESE TYPICALLY COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES CAN BE CONSIDERED
23:06:49 IN THE NMU FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES IF THE CITY DEEMS
23:06:54 THEM APPROPRIATE UNDER SECTION 27-59 OF THE LAND
23:06:58 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
23:07:00 THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CURRENTLY ONLY ALLOWS A
23:07:03 MAXIMUM OF A 1.0 F.A.R. FOR SINGLE-USE STRUCTURES AND A
23:07:09 1.5 FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR VERTICAL MIXED USE STRUCTURES TO
23:07:14 ALLOW GREATER FLEXIBILITY, THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS
23:07:18 SUBMITTED A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN THE FEBRUARY
23:07:23 CYCLE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO CLARIFY MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO
23:07:26 IN OVERALL PERMITTED USES.
23:07:28 SINCE THIS REZONING IS GOING TO HEARING BEFORE THE
23:07:31 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT, WHICH IS
23:07:34 TACPA 21-04, THE APPLICANT HAS INCLUDED LANGUAGE IN THE
23:07:41 SITE PLAN, SEE NOTE 11, WHICH WILL ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN
23:07:45 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE AS PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT
23:07:48 WORKS THROUGH THE PROCESS.
23:07:51 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED
23:07:53 LANGUAGE UNDER NOTE 11 AND FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE
23:07:58 INTENT OF THE NMU FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
23:08:01 OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL IMPLEMENT
23:08:04 THE OVERALL VISION OUTLINED IN THE WEST RIVERFRONT
23:08:07 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
23:08:08 THE REZONING WILL PROVIDE FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
23:08:11 OVERALL THAT PROVIDES AN INTERCONNECTED GRID OF STREETS
23:08:14 WHICH SUPPORTS WALKING AND TRANSIT USAGE.
23:08:17 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE NOTE PROVIDED
23:08:21 UNDER NOTE 11, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE
23:08:24 PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS
23:08:28 OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
23:08:31 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
23:08:33 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
23:08:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
23:08:36 LaCHONE.
23:08:38 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COUNCIL.
23:08:40 LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, IF I MAY SHARE
23:08:44 MY SCREEN.
23:08:45 THANK YOU.
23:08:48 DO YOU SEE MY PowerPoint?
23:08:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
23:08:52 GO AHEAD.
23:08:52 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU.
23:08:53 THIS REQUEST AGAIN IS TO REZONE FROM NMU 35 NEIGHBORHOOD
23:08:56 MIXED USE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
23:09:02 ON THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE A TOTAL OF NINE WAIVERS
23:09:08 REQUESTED.
23:09:08 LET ME CHANGE MY VIEW.
23:09:10 JUST A SECOND.
23:09:11 SO THESE ARE THE WAIVERS WHICH ARE REQUESTED, WHICH ARE
23:09:16 ON THE SITE PLAN, AND YOU'LL SEE SEVERAL OF THE WAIVERS
23:09:19 ARE RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVERS, AND THEN
23:09:23 THERE'S A WAIVER TO TRANSPORTATION FOR PARKING, LOADING
23:09:26 SPACES, A REDUCTION IN LOADING SPACES, AND THE DIMENSIONS
23:09:34 OF THE LOADING SPACES WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED.
23:09:37 ALSO, THEY HAVE A WAIVER TO MANEUVER IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY,
23:09:42 FOR THE LOADING AND SOLID WASTE SERVICE, AND TO ALLOW
23:09:45 ACCESS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL PARKING LOTS TO A LOCAL STREET.
23:09:48 SO THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REZONE THE PROPERTY WHICH IS
23:09:53 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY, WHICH DAVID HAS SHOWN YOU ON THE
23:09:57 MAP IN WEST TAMPA, WHICH IS BOUNDED BY THE INTERSTATE TO
23:10:01 THE SOUTH, ROME IS TO THE WEST, BOULEVARD IS TO THE EAST.
23:10:06 AND THEY ARE REQUESTING TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH A
23:10:11 MIXTURE OF USES LISTED.
23:10:14 THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR ALL USES ALLOWED IN THE NMU
23:10:17 DISTRICT, RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S GOODS, DRIVE-UP ATM,
23:10:21 PRIVATE SCHOOL, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY, HOTEL WITH A MAXIMUM
23:10:26 OF 200 ROOMS, A BANK AND A BANK WITH DRIVE-THRU ATM.
23:10:30 THE REQUEST CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 31.59 ACRES.
23:10:32 AND THAT IS ALL OF THE SITES THAT YOU SAW IDENTIFIED ON
23:10:34 THE MAP PROVIDED BY DAVID, AND I CAN SHOW YOU ON THE
23:10:37 AERIAL SHORTLY.
23:10:38 ALL OF THESE ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE WEST RIVER VISION
23:10:43 PLAN AREA.
23:10:44 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP THE
23:10:47 USES PERMITTED AND LISTED IN THE USE TABLE WITHIN THE
23:10:52 PROJECT BOUNDARY.
23:10:53 SO THE PROJECT BOUNDARY HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE
23:10:56 APPLICANT COMES IN FOR PERMITTING, PRIOR TO PERMITTING
23:10:59 THEY MUST SUBMIT FOR INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW.
23:11:02 IT IS REVIEWED BY STAFF TO ENSURE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH
23:11:06 THE APPROVED PD SHOULD THE PD PLAN BE APPROVED, AND THEN
23:11:10 FROM THAT POINT, THEY WILL MOVE FORWARD TO PERMITTING.
23:11:13 SO THIS IS THE PROCESS REQUESTED THROUGH THIS PD PROCESS.
23:11:17 SO THEY HAVE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN AN OVERALL
23:11:20 BOUNDARY WITH THE PROJECT IN THE BLOCK AREAS IDENTIFIED,
23:11:23 AND THEN THE USES WOULD BE PERMITTED ANYWHERE WITHIN THAT
23:11:26 LOCATION.
23:11:26 THE NMU ZONING DISTRICTS WERE CREATED THROUGH AN
23:11:30 AREA-WIDE REZONING IN 2016.
23:11:33 THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST REZONING BEFORE COUNCIL FROM THE
23:11:37 NMU DISTRICT, SO JUST TO PROVIDE THE BRIEF BACKGROUND,
23:11:42 THE TABLE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR YOU ALSO IN THE STAFF
23:11:45 REPORT.
23:11:46 BUT THE NMU ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS, THEY ARE A
23:11:50 COMBINATION OF FORM BASED CODE REGULATIONS AND STANDARD
23:11:53 CODE PROVISIONS.
23:11:54 SO THE ZONING DISTRICTS WERE DEVELOPED TO IMPLEMENT THE
23:11:56 WEST RIVER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
23:11:59 THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCOMPASS THE ENTIRE WEST RIVER NMU
23:12:02 DISTRICT BUT IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THAT BOUNDARY.
23:12:05 AND THE GOAL OF THE WEST RIVER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS TO
23:12:09 CREATE A MIXED INCOME, MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH
23:12:13 INCORPORATES NEIGHBORHOOD-SERVING USES.
23:12:15 SO THE MAJORITY OF THE PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN THIS
23:12:19 OVERALL PROJECT AREA CURRENTLY VACANT.
23:12:21 I CAN SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THE SITE AND WHAT'S
23:12:24 SURROUNDING THE SITE.
23:12:25 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 85 FEET FOR PRIMARY
23:12:28 STRUCTURES AND 45 FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
23:12:33 DEVELOPMENT ON THE BLOCKS WEST OF THE PROJECT HAVE EACH
23:12:35 REQUIRED VARIANCES OR DESIGN EXCEPTIONS DUE TO THE TREES
23:12:41 AND THE FORM-BASED CODE REQUIREMENTS.
23:12:43 SO IF APPROVED, THIS PD WOULD ALLOW THE APPLICANT
23:12:46 FLEXIBILITY TO DEVELOP THE REMAINING PARCELS WITHIN THIS
23:12:50 PLANNING AREA WITH THE PERMITTED USES AS LISTED.
23:12:54 THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SITE IS NMU 35,
23:12:59 WHICH DAVID HAS MENTIONED.
23:13:00 IT DOES ALLOW FOR MAXIMUM OF 1.5 F.A.R. FOR VERTICAL
23:13:04 MIXED USE PROJECTS OR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS AND A 1.0
23:13:07 F.A.R. FOR NONRESIDENTIAL OR 35 UNITS PER ACRE, THE
23:13:13 DEVELOPER'S OPTION NMU.
23:13:15 SO THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
23:13:19 AND THE PARCELS ARE IDENTIFIED HERE IN RED, OUTLINED IN
23:13:23 RED, AND TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS AERIAL, THIS IS I-275
23:13:28 ALONG THE SOUTH.
23:13:30 THIS IS ROME AVENUE ON THE WEST, SPRUCE AVENUE IS THE
23:13:34 NORTH BOUNDARY, AND THEN BOULEVARD IS ON THE EAST.
23:13:39 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED.
23:13:42 THERE WAS A SITE PLAN PACKET ACTUALLY SUBMITTED, BUT THIS
23:13:45 IS THE SITE PLAN.
23:13:47 TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS PLAN, THIS IS THE INTERSTATE WHICH
23:13:51 WOULD BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTH, WHICH IS OFF THE PICTURE
23:13:55 ON THE SITE PLAN.
23:13:56 NORTH BOULEVARD IS HERE ON THE EAST.
23:13:58 THIS IS SPRUCE STREET ON THE NORTH.
23:14:01 THIS IS ROME AVENUE ON THE WEST.
23:14:04 SO THE BLOCKS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN THIS BLUE LINE OR
23:14:09 PURPLE LINE, THESE ARE THE BLOCKS UNDER THE REQUEST.
23:14:14 THE AREAS THAT ARE GRAYED ARE NOT INCLUDED WITHIN THIS
23:14:17 REQUEST.
23:14:17 WHAT I'VE DONE IS I'VE TAKEN THE AERIAL AND ZOOMED IN ON
23:14:23 THE AERIAL.
23:14:24 THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS FENCED SO THERE IS NO
23:14:27 INTERNAL ACCESS TO THE SITE, SO THE PHOTOS THAT I'LL SHOW
23:14:31 YOU, I'LL JUST TAKE YOU ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF THE SITE.
23:14:34 SO WE'LL START SOUTH END OF THE SITE HERE ALONG MAIN
23:14:38 STREET AND THEN WORK OUR WAY TO THE WEST UP TO THE
23:14:41 NORTHWEST PORTION.
23:14:42 THEN RUN ALONG THE NORTH, COME BACK EAST AND BACK TO THE
23:14:45 SOUTH.
23:14:45 SO THIS IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE ON MAIN STREET.
23:14:50 HERE ARE THE VIEWS OF THE SITE.
23:14:53 THIS IS ONE AREA WHERE IT WAS -- YOU CAN SEE WHAT'S GOING
23:14:57 ON SO THE MAJORITY YOU CAN SEE IN THE PICTURE TO THE
23:15:00 RIGHT, THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS FENCED.
23:15:02 THIS IS THE SITE.
23:15:05 THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAIN AND OREGON.
23:15:09 THIS IS THE VIEW ON THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT, IF YOU'RE
23:15:11 LOOKING WEST ON MAIN.
23:15:15 THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
23:15:18 THIS IS ON ROME.
23:15:20 SO STARTING FROM MAIN AND WORKING YOUR WAY NORTH ON ROME.
23:15:27 THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE ALSO.
23:15:29 THIS IS ON ROME AVENUE, AND THEN THIS IS AT THE CORNER,
23:15:32 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROME
23:15:36 AND SPRUCE.
23:15:37 ON THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF
23:15:40 THE SITE WHICH IS ON SPRUCE STREET.
23:15:43 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
23:15:45 THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROME AND SPRUCE.
23:15:49 AND THEN THESE ARE PICTURES NORTH OF THE SITE, WHICH ARE
23:15:52 THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, THAT'S LOCATED TO THE NORTH.
23:15:59 THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE THAT'S ON THE LEFT.
23:16:02 THIS IS ON SPRUCE STREET THAT'S LOOKING SOUTH.
23:16:04 THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
23:16:06 THAT'S THE VIEW ON SPRUCE STREET.
23:16:08 AND THAT'S LOOKING EAST, AND YOU CAN SEE THE OVERPASS TO
23:16:13 BOULEVARD THERE IN THE DISTANCE IN THE PICTURE.
23:16:16 AND THIS IS A VIEW THAT BRINGS US AROUND TO THE EAST SIDE
23:16:20 OF THE SITE.
23:16:22 THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON BOULEVARD.
23:16:24 THIS IS THE OVERPASS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PICTURE.
23:16:28 BLAKE IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LEFT SIDE OF THE
23:16:31 PICTURE.
23:16:32 THIS IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE, THE PICTURE IN THE
23:16:34 CENTER AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE
23:16:37 SITE, AND THAT'S BLAKE.
23:16:41 THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE, SO IT BRINGS US BACK
23:16:44 AROUND TO THE SOUTH, AND YOU CAN SEE THE INTERSTATE THERE
23:16:48 IN THE BACKGROUND.
23:16:49 SO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE HAS REVIEWED THE
23:16:54 APPLICATION.
23:16:55 FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA LAND
23:16:57 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
23:16:59 THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION.
23:17:02 PLEASE REFERENCE THOSE WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT.
23:17:05 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
23:17:09 WAIVERS IN THE APPLICATION, THERE ARE SITE PLAN REVISIONS
23:17:13 REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
23:17:15 SO THERE ARE SITE PLAN REVISIONS THAT ARE LISTED WITHIN
23:17:19 THE STAFF REPORT.
23:17:20 THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL REVISION REQUIRED, AND THAT IS
23:17:24 TO REMOVE A NOTE ON THE PLAN WHICH STATES THAT NO SINGLE
23:17:29 TENANT SHALL EXCEED 35,000 SQUARE FEET.
23:17:34 THESE CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
23:17:36 READING.
23:17:37 THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO MAKE ALL CHANGES REQUESTED,
23:17:41 AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
23:17:43 I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
23:17:49 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
23:17:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT.
23:17:51 MR. CREMER, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
23:18:01 [OATH]
23:18:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHO MOVED TO CLOSE, JAKE?
23:18:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
23:18:08 GO AHEAD, SIR.
23:18:12 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
23:18:13 IN LIGHT OF THE LATE HOUR, I CAN TAKE A HINT WHEN I NEED
23:18:17 TO.
23:18:19 JAKE CREMER, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET.
23:18:22 WE HAVE A PRESENTATION PREPARED.
23:18:23 HAPPY TO PRESENT IF ANYONE HAS SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.
23:18:27 I THINK STAFF HIT THE HIGH POINTS, COUNCIL.
23:18:29 THE MAIN IDEA HERE, THE ENTIRE PURPOSE IS ACTUALLY TO
23:18:34 IMPLEMENT THAT WEST RIVER VISION PLAN THAT THE CITY
23:18:37 WORKED ON SO HARD IN 2015.
23:18:42 WE'VE LEARNED THROUGH EXPERIENCE WITH DEVELOPMENT THAT'S
23:18:46 ACTUALLY GOING ON ON THE PROPERTY NOW THAT WE JUST NEED
23:18:50 SOME UPDATES REALLY TO THE NMU CATEGORY, AND THAT'S
23:18:54 ESSENTIALLY WHAT THIS PD IS DOING.
23:18:56 WE WEREN'T ABLE TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE THA PROPERTY IN
23:19:00 THIS BECAUSE UNDER ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT NOW.
23:19:04 WE RECEIVED ONE CALL IN SUPPORT AND NOT AWARE OF ANY
23:19:10 OTHER OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT.
23:19:12 WE'VE WORKED ON THE WAIVERS WITH STAFF AND BELIEVE THAT
23:19:16 THOSE MEET THE CRITERIA IN THE CODE.
23:19:18 SO WITH THAT, I'LL CLOSE AND OFFER OUR ENTIRE TEAM IS
23:19:23 HERE IF YOU DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
23:19:25 THANK YOU.
23:19:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
23:19:29 MR. SHELBY.
23:19:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A QUESTION FOR MS. DOCK, DID YOU
23:19:32 SAY THERE WAS A REVISION SHEET ASSOCIATED WITH THIS IN
23:19:34 THE STAFF REPORT?
23:19:37 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE
23:19:40 MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND I BELIEVE THEY
23:19:45 WERE IN THE REPORT.
23:19:46 THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED?
23:19:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M LOOKING FOR A REVISION SHEET.
23:19:51 I DIDN'T HAPPEN TO SEE IT.
23:19:52 I'M SORRY.
23:19:53 >>LaCHONE DOCK: I APOLOGIZE.
23:19:54 IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED.
23:19:56 THEY ARE JUST LISTED UNDER THE INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENTAL --
23:19:59 I APOLOGIZE.
23:20:00 IT'S NOT LISTED AS A SEPARATE SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
23:20:03 STREET AS WE NORMALLY PUT IN THE STAFF REPORT.
23:20:05 BUT THE MODIFICATIONS AS LISTED UNDER EACH DEPARTMENT,
23:20:08 THOSE ARE THE ONES REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
23:20:12 READING.
23:20:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: GREAT.
23:20:13 THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
23:20:14 >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU.
23:20:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT
23:20:17 IS HERE TO SPEAK?
23:20:18 THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
23:20:19 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED?
23:20:21 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
23:20:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
23:20:24 GUDES.
23:20:24 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:20:26 ALL IN FAVOR AYE.
23:20:28 COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, WOULD YOU MIND READING THIS LAST
23:20:32 ITEM?
23:20:32 >>LUIS VIERA: SURE.
23:20:33 WE'RE ON ITEM 11.
23:20:40 I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
23:20:43 CONSIDERATION.
23:20:43 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
23:20:46 1510, 1514, 1516, 1520 WEST SPRUCE STREET, 901 AND 1301
23:20:53 GREEN STREET, 1830 NORTH OREGON STREET AND FOLIO NUMBERS
23:20:58 179822.0016, 179822.0032 AND 179822.0034, IN THE CITY OF
23:21:13 TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
23:21:15 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION NMU-35, NEIGHBORHOOD
23:21:20 MIXED USE, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ALL USES ALLOWED
23:21:25 IN SECTION 212, TABLE 212.2 RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S
23:21:30 GOODS, DRIVE-UP ATM, PRIVATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY,
23:21:35 HOTEL, MAXIMUM 200 ROOMS, BANK -- DRIVE-THRU ATM,
23:21:42 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
23:21:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN
23:21:47 VIERA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:21:49 >>LUIS VIERA: OH, AND YOU WERE GOING TO SAY --
23:21:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHY DON'T YOU DO IT.
23:21:50 >>LUIS VIERA: GO AHEAD.
23:21:51 I'M DUMBER THAN USUAL TONIGHT.
23:21:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND THE REVISION SHEET AS OUTLINED BY
23:21:57 MS. DOCK AND AS AGREED TO BY THE APPLICANT.
23:21:59 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
23:22:00 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
23:22:01 REVISION SHEET AS AGREED AND STIPULATED TO BY THE
23:22:04 PARTIES.
23:22:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
23:22:07 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:22:08 ROLL CALL?
23:22:11 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
23:22:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
23:22:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
23:22:16 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
23:22:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
23:22:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
23:22:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
23:22:22 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
23:22:24 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT
23:22:28 9:30 A.M.
23:22:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S IT.
23:22:31 >> THANK YOU ALL.
23:22:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
23:22:32 COUNCILMAN CARLSON, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, SIR?
23:22:37 >>BILL CARLSON: JUST QUICKLY BECAUSE I'M NOT ABLE TO TALK
23:22:40 TO YOU ALL BECAUSE OF SUNSHINE.
23:22:43 I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW ON THE SO-CALLED TOILET TO TAP
23:22:46 ISSUE, I TALKED TO THE CHIEF OF STAFF AND HE RECOMMENDED
23:22:50 I MEET WITH CHUCK WEBER, WHO MR. -- CALLS KANSAS.
23:22:55 I DID THAT ON MONDAY.
23:22:57 I THINK WE HAD A GOOD MEETING.
23:23:00 MY CONCERN WAS ABOUT THE ATTITUDE THE CITY OF TAMPA AND
23:23:04 THE WATER DEPARTMENT TOOK IN THE PAST TOWARD REGIONAL
23:23:08 COLLABORATION.
23:23:09 AND IN THE LONG CONVERSATION WITH HIM, IT SEEMS LIKE THE
23:23:12 ATTITUDE IS CHANGING OR HAS CHANGED, AND ONE RESULT OF
23:23:17 THE CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD WAS THAT HE SENT OUT YOU THE
23:23:21 DRAFT OF THE ALTERNATIVES WHICH I THINK ALL OF YOU GOT BY
23:23:24 E-MAIL.
23:23:25 THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS AND OTHERS WERE CONCERNED THAT
23:23:27 THE CITY WAS NOT, IN THE PAST HAD NOT BEEN TRANSPARENT
23:23:31 ABOUT THINGS LIKE THAT.
23:23:32 SO HE'S COMMITTED TO A NEW LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY TO
23:23:35 SUBMIT INFORMATION, CIRCULATE INFORMATION, AND SEVERAL OF
23:23:40 THE KEY OPTIONS THAT INCLUDE THE REGION ARE INCLUDED IN
23:23:42 THOSE ALTERNATIVES, AND WILL CONTINUE TO PUSH ON THOSE.
23:23:46 I'LL MEET WITH THEM AND I KNOW YOU ALL WILL AS WELL, BUT
23:23:49 I'M PUSHING FOR TRANSPARENCY TO MAKE SURE WE ARE FISCALLY
23:23:53 RESPONSIBLE.
23:23:53 ONE OF THE IDEAS I PUSHED WOULD SAVE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS
23:23:55 OF DOLLARS OVER DOING IT OURSELVES.
23:23:58 AND I THINK WE MAY BE MAKING SOME HEADWAY.
23:24:05 I WANT TO THANK MR. WEBER AND CHIEF BENNETT AND JEAN
23:24:08 DUNCAN AND OTHERS FOR THEIR INTEREST AND ALSO THE MAYOR
23:24:11 IN THEIR INTEREST IN TRYING TO BE COLLABORATIVE AND
23:24:17 TRANSPARENT ON THESE ISSUES.
23:24:18 THANK YOU.
23:24:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
23:24:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO, SIR.
23:24:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
23:24:23 I WOULD LIKE TO -- TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO GIVE A
23:24:28 COMMENDATION TO THE 2021 AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE
23:24:32 CHAMPIONS, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA WOMEN'S BASKETBALL
23:24:37 TEAM --
23:24:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
23:24:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FOR WINNING THEIR FIRST-EVER ATHLETIC
23:24:43 CONFERENCE TITLE AND GOING TO THE NCAA DIVISION ONE
23:24:47 WOMEN'S BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT.
23:24:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:24:50 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
23:24:52 ALL IN FAVOR?
23:24:53 OPPOSED?
23:24:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THIS OFF-SITE?
23:24:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
23:25:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT HAPPENED TODAY.
23:25:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, IT ALREADY HAPPENED.
23:25:05 [ LAUGHTER ]
23:25:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR?
23:25:07 AYE.
23:25:08 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
23:25:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING ELSE THIS EVENING.
23:25:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA.
23:25:13 >>LUIS VIERA: I BELIEVE I ONLY HAVE ONE, MR. CHAIR.
23:25:16 I MOTIONED LAST WEEK FOR THE ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT TO
23:25:20 US NEXT WEEK ON THE PERSPECTIVE USE OF THE AMERICAN
23:25:24 RELIEF ACT FUNDS, THAT IS THE FEDERAL STIMULUS ACT SIGNED
23:25:27 INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN.
23:25:29 IT APPEARS THAT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT TOO SOON.
23:25:33 I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND WITHDRAW THAT, IF I MAY, AS FIRST
23:25:37 MOTION.
23:25:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA TO
23:25:40 WITHDRAW.
23:25:41 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
23:25:42 ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
23:25:44 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
23:25:45 THE NEXT MOTION I WOULD HAVE BECAUSE IT APPEARS BY THE
23:25:47 TIME THE ADMINISTRATION GETS GUIDANCE ON HOW THESE FUNDS
23:25:50 CAN BE USED, IT'S GOING TO BE CONFLICTING WITH BUDGET
23:25:55 SEASON, SO TO SPEAK.
23:25:57 I THINK IT WOULD JUST BE WORTHY FOR US TO PASS A SENSE OF
23:26:01 COUNCIL THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT IT IS LEGALLY
23:26:04 PERMISSIBLE, WHICH I THINK IT WILL BE, THAT AMERICAN
23:26:08 RELIEF ACT FUNDS BE USED IN PART TO ADDRESS SOME OF OUR
23:26:14 PUBLIC SAFETY DEFICITS THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IN
23:26:16 THE CITY OF TAMPA.
23:26:18 I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT TAMPA FIRE RESCUE WITH REGARDS TO
23:26:24 EAST TAMPA, HELPING WEST TAMPA, CHANNELSIDE, NEW TAMPA,
23:26:29 STATION 13 AND NORTH TAMPA, ET CETERA.
23:26:32 AND TO THE EXTENT THAT THOSE FUNDS CAN BE USED IN PART,
23:26:34 BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT USES FOR THEM,
23:26:37 TO HELP REMEDY THOSE DEFICITS, I'D LIKE TO HAVE A SENSE
23:26:40 OF COUNCIL IN THAT REGARD.
23:26:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECOND
23:26:45 FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:26:46 ALL IN FAVOR AYE.
23:26:47 ANYTHING ELSE?
23:26:48 >>LUIS VIERA: NO, SIR.
23:26:49 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
23:26:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER?
23:26:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING TONIGHT, THANK YOU.
23:26:53 >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, I APOLOGIZE.
23:26:55 IF SOMEBODY HERE, I DON'T KNOW, COULD JUST COMMUNICATE
23:26:58 THAT TO ADMINISTRATION VIA MAYBE -- I'LL JUST SEND THEM A
23:27:03 TEXT OR WHATEVER.
23:27:04 JUST TO LET THEM KNOW.
23:27:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOTHING, SIR?
23:27:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING, MR. CHAIRMAN.
23:27:09 THANK YOU.
23:27:09 GOOD MEETING.
23:27:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, DO YOU HAVE
23:27:11 ANYTHING?
23:27:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR, I HAVE ONE WITH FOUR ITEMS
23:27:14 UNDER IT.
23:27:16 AS FINANCE CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT STAFF
23:27:19 PROVIDE A REPORT FOR RECEIPT AND FILE IN REGARDS TO THE
23:27:25 K-1, BUDGET AMENDMENT ANALYSIS REQUIRED TO GIVE MR.
23:27:29 MARTIN SHELBY A RAISE TO THE 155,000.
23:27:34 I SAID BEFORE I'M NOT OPPOSED.
23:27:35 I GOT TO KNOW WHY AND HOW WE CAME TO THOSE ITEMS.
23:27:38 ITEM 2, REVIEW WHERE THE RAISES FIT AND TO THE COMPARABLE
23:27:43 STAFF OF THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BASED ON 40 OR MORE
23:27:47 HOUR WEEK.
23:27:48 THREE, HOW THE PAY IS COMMENSURATE TO OTHER OUTSIDE
23:27:53 COUNSEL PAY AND WORKLOAD.
23:27:55 AND, FOUR, HOW THE INCREASES CORRESPOND TO THE CITY'S
23:27:59 CHARTER AS IT RELATES TO THE INTERPRETATION FOR THE
23:28:02 INCREASE.
23:28:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CITRO SECONDED IT?
23:28:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, I DID.
23:28:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT'S THAT EXPRESSION ABOUT KICKING
23:28:15 THE HORSE, DEAD HORSE OR SOMETHING OR ANOTHER.
23:28:18 KICKING A DEAD DOG.
23:28:20 I THINK WE'VE WRESTLED WITH THIS LONG ENOUGH.
23:28:24 RECENTLY, I THINK -- I CAN'T SUPPORT THE MOTION.
23:28:27 IF MR. MIRANDA WANTS TO GET THIS INFORMATION OFF LINE
23:28:31 FROM STAFF, HE HAS THAT PREROGATIVE AND RIGHT TO DO THAT,
23:28:34 BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT THE MOTION BECAUSE FRANKLY I THINK WE
23:28:38 ALREADY SPENT TOO MUCH TIME ON THIS ALREADY.
23:28:40 THANK YOU.
23:28:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
23:28:42 WE HAVE A --
23:28:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S FINE WITH ME, MR. DINGFELDER.
23:28:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
23:28:47 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
23:28:48 COUNCILMAN CITRO WITH THE SECOND.
23:28:50 ALL IN FAVOR?
23:28:54 >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, JUST TO CLARIFY, COUNCILMAN
23:28:57 MIRANDA, IS HE GOING TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON HOW THE
23:29:00 NUMBER WAS ARRIVED AT OR --
23:29:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WELL, LIKE I SAID, YOU NEED A BUDGET
23:29:05 AMENDMENT.
23:29:06 THE NUMBER WAS ARRIVED I DON'T KNOW HOW.
23:29:09 WAS ANY ANALYSIS DONE OR JUST A NUMBER PICKED OUT OF THE
23:29:13 SKY?
23:29:15 I DON'T REALLY KNOW HOW.
23:29:16 IT'S INCUMBENT ON ME AS FINANCE CHAIR TO FIND OUT WHERE
23:29:21 THE NUMBER CAME FROM.
23:29:22 I JUST DON'T KNOW.
23:29:27 >>LUIS VIERA: I'LL SUPPORT IT AS A PROFESSIONAL COURTESY.
23:29:32 I DO THINK WE VOTED ON THIS BUT IF A MEMBER OF THIS BODY
23:29:35 WANTS THAT INFORMATION I CAN SUPPORT THAT AS A
23:29:38 PROFESSIONAL COURTESY.
23:29:40 YES, SIR.
23:29:40 THANK YOU.
23:29:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA IS ASKING THAT, ARE WE
23:29:46 ASKING CAN THESE COMPARABLES BE DONE WITH ALL THE CITY
23:29:49 ATTORNEYS?
23:29:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M ASKING THAT A REVIEW WHERE THE
23:29:56 RAISES FITS IN THE COMPARABLE STAFF -- IN OTHER WORDS,
23:30:00 THERE MIGHT BE A TUMBLING EFFECT SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE IN
23:30:03 THE CITY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEYS' OFFICE THAT IS BASED ON 40
23:30:08 HOUR OR MORE WEEK.
23:30:09 WE HAVEN'T COMPARED IT TO MUCH OF ANYTHING.
23:30:13 WE CAME UP WITH A REVIEW.
23:30:16 I DID THAT.
23:30:17 I WANT TO COMPARE IT TO THE CITY STAFF OF CITY ATTORNEYS,
23:30:20 WHAT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY ATTORNEYS WE HAVE IN THE
23:30:23 CITY.
23:30:23 I WOULD IMAGINE IT'S MORE THAN 15, IN THAT REGARD.
23:30:29 I WANT TO BASE ON A 40 HOUR A WEEK OR MORE AND THE PAY
23:30:35 COMMENSURATE TO OUTSIDE COUNSEL PAY AND WORKLOAD, SO WE
23:30:42 HAVE SOMETHING TO COMPARE WITH.
23:30:43 IF WE GO OUT AND SOMEBODY ASKED US, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO
23:30:47 TELL THEM?
23:30:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I RESPECT YOU, SIR TREMENDOUSLY, BUT
23:30:54 THAT'S KIND OF LIKE SAYING THE CLERK'S OFFICE.
23:30:56 WHEN I LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, I DON'T THINK THEY ARE
23:30:59 COMPARABLE TO SOME OF THE OTHER CITIES AS WELL, TOO.
23:31:01 IF THAT'S THE CASE, WE MAY DOWN THE ROAD BE LOOKING AT
23:31:05 ALL DEPARTMENTS IN THE FUTURE.
23:31:08 AS A COURTESY, MR. VIERA SAID, I'LL GO AHEAD AND SUPPORT
23:31:13 IT, BUT, AGAIN, I JUST THINK THAT WE ARE KICKING A DEAD
23:31:18 HORSE.
23:31:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M NOT ASKING TO KICK THE HORSE.
23:31:21 I'M NOT ASKING TO CHANGE ANYONE'S MIND AT ALL.
23:31:24 NOT AT ALL.
23:31:26 I DON'T KICK A DEAD HORSE BECAUSE THE SON OR THE DAUGHTER
23:31:30 OF THE DEAD HORSE MAY KICK ME.
23:31:32 SO I KNOW WHAT -- I'VE KICKED MY HORSE BEFORE AND IT WAS
23:31:37 19 DAYS IN THE HOSPITAL.
23:31:38 I CAN TELL YOU IT'S JUST SOMETHING I THINK IS NECESSARY
23:31:42 FOR THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND WHERE IT CAME FROM.
23:31:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON AND THEN
23:31:49 DINGFELDER.
23:31:50 >>BILL CARLSON: I JUST RESPECTFULLY VOTE AGAINST.
23:31:53 I DID MY OWN ANALYSIS AND I AM IN FAVOR OF GETTING MORE
23:31:57 INFORMATION, BUT WE GOT A BUNCH OF INFORMATION AT LAST
23:32:01 TWO MEETINGS AGO.
23:32:03 MORE THAN I THINK ANY OF US GOT ON THE SALARY REVIEW OF
23:32:08 THE LEGISLATIVE AIDES.
23:32:10 I THINK THAT THERE WAS SOME TOYING WITH THE CATEGORIES
23:32:15 UNDER THE LAST CITY ATTORNEY, AND I HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT
23:32:21 THIS POSITION BEING TREATED FAIRLY.
23:32:25 AND SOME OF THE BACK CHANNEL QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS I'VE
23:32:29 HEARD, I THINK ARE NOT FAIR.
23:32:33 ANY IMPLICATION THAT OUR ATTORNEY IS NOT WORKING A 40
23:32:41 HOUR WEEK, I AGREE HE'S PROBABLY WORKING 80 HOURS A WEEK.
23:32:45 I'LL RESPECTFULLY VOTE AGAINST THIS.
23:32:47 I WOULD ASK IN MY OWN ANALYSIS I THINK HE SHOULD GET PAID
23:32:50 MORE THAN WHAT WAS PROPOSED.
23:32:52 IF A FAIR OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS IS DONE, I THINK WE SHOULD
23:32:59 PROPOSE INCREASING IT.
23:33:00 THANK YOU.
23:33:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THE MOTION.
23:33:06 >>LUIS VIERA: JOHN, YOU CAN GO FIRST.
23:33:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THE MOTION, MR. MIRANDA, I
23:33:11 DON'T KNOW IF YOU SPECIFIED WHO IS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING
23:33:13 THIS ANALYSIS.
23:33:15 I WOULD GUESS, I WOULD PRESUME THAT THAT SHOULD BE DONE
23:33:19 BY HR AS AN OBJECTIVE BODY.
23:33:25 I'M STILL NOT GOING TO SUPPORT IT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO
23:33:28 CLARIFY THAT.
23:33:29 ALSO, IN TERMS OF YOUR TIMING, I DO BELIEVE, WHAT WAS OUR
23:33:33 TIMING, MR. CHAIRMAN, IN REGARD TO BRINGING BACK THE
23:33:37 RESOLUTION.
23:33:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOR MR. SHELBY, NEXT PAY PERIOD.
23:33:42 15 DAYS FROM NOW.
23:33:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT.
23:33:44 I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU'RE TRYING TO JUMP THIS IN BEFORE WE
23:33:47 PASS THE RESOLUTION OR YOU JUST WANT TO DO IT AFTER THE
23:33:52 FACT.
23:33:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIRMAN AND MR. DINGFELDER, I
23:33:56 THINK YOU KNOW ME BETTER THAN THAT.
23:33:58 I'M NOT TRYING TO SUBVERT YOU OR ANYONE ELSE ON THIS
23:34:02 COUNCIL.
23:34:03 I JUST WANT THE INFORMATION.
23:34:05 IF THIS COUNCIL TELLS ME I CAN'T GET IT, I UNDERSTAND
23:34:07 THAT.
23:34:08 WE GO FROM THERE.
23:34:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHICH AGENCY, HR, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE
23:34:15 WITH HR?
23:34:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HR AGENCY, MORE LIKELY THE ONE THAT
23:34:19 HANDLES ALL OF THE CITY'S THINGS WHEN IT COMES TO THIS
23:34:21 EFFECT, I WOULD ASK THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THEM TO DO
23:34:24 WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO TO GET THE INFORMATION FROM HR,
23:34:27 WHOEVER.
23:34:28 I DON'T KNOW WHO DOES THAT.
23:34:29 YOU SAID HR, THEN I HAVE TO TAKE YOUR WORD IT'S HR.
23:34:32 I USUALLY THINK THAT HR IS THE ONE THAT DOES ALL THE
23:34:35 ANALYSIS.
23:34:36 SOME STATISTICIAN HAS THE WORKLOAD IN COMPARISON TO THESE
23:34:40 THINGS WHEN THEY HIRE PEOPLE, WHEN THEY DO THINGS.
23:34:42 I WOULD IMAGINE IT IS HR.
23:34:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. MIRANDA.
23:34:46 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
23:34:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
23:34:50 >>BILL CARLSON: MY SECOND COMMENT, BASED ON THAT, IF HR
23:34:53 IS GOING TO DO THE ANALYSIS AND I'VE SEEN THE STUDIES
23:34:56 DONE BY HR IN THE PAST, THEY'VE BEEN OBJECTIVE, I
23:34:59 REMEMBER EVEN THOUGH WE'RE ALL TIRED I REMEMBER MR.
23:35:03 MIRANDA HAS SUPPORTED ME MANY TIMES WHEN I'VE ASKED FOR
23:35:06 SIMILAR KINDS OF INFORMATION TO BE REQUESTED, AND EVEN
23:35:09 THOUGH I FULLY SUPPORT OUR CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY AND WILL
23:35:13 STAND BY OUR MOTION BEFORE AND OR INCREASING IT, I WILL
23:35:18 CHANGE MY VOTE TO YES.
23:35:20 THANK YOU.
23:35:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
23:35:23 COUNCILMAN VIERA.
23:35:24 >>LUIS VIERA: I WAS GOING TO ASK, AGAIN, I'M GOING TO
23:35:28 STAND BY MY VOTE WITH REGARDS TO THE SALARY.
23:35:31 I THINK I INDICATED THAT A COUNTY COURT JUDGE MAKES, I
23:35:34 BELIEVE IT IS, SIMILAR NUMBER.
23:35:37 I THINK THAT IS A REASONABLE NUMBER TO GO.
23:35:39 I THINK GOING HIGHER THAN THAT, I THINK IS SOMETHING THAT
23:35:42 IS NOT WARRANTED UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
23:35:45 I KNOW THEM, BUT I'LL SUPPORT THIS.
23:35:47 ONE QUESTION ON THE MOTION, SIR, AGAIN, I'M GLAD TO
23:35:50 SUPPORT THIS AS A PROFESSIONAL COURTESY TO A FINE
23:35:53 GENTLEMAN.
23:35:54 BUT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A REPORT OR A WRITTEN REPORT OR
23:36:00 --
23:36:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WOULD LIKE A WRITTEN REPORT SO THAT
23:36:02 WE CAN ALL HAVE THE WRITTEN REPORT.
23:36:04 I'M NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN THAT.
23:36:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: JUST FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN, I ALWAYS
23:36:14 GIVE DEFERENCE, SUPPORT MR. MIRANDA, BUT NO MATTER HOW IT
23:36:18 COMES BACK, THE CHARTER SAYS THIS BODY HAS THE RIGHT TO
23:36:21 OPPOSE THE SALARY FOR OUR ATTORNEY.
23:36:24 AGAIN, I THINK HE DESERVES A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN HE'S
23:36:28 GETTING.
23:36:28 WORKING FOR SEVEN PEOPLE.
23:36:30 SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT POSITION CLEAR, HOWEVER IT
23:36:33 COMES BACK, I'M STILL GOING TO SUPPORT MR. SHELBY GETTING
23:36:36 A DECENT SALARY FOR WHAT HE'S DONE FOR ALMOST 15 YEARS
23:36:39 AND HAD NOT BEEN COMPENSATED PROPERLY.
23:36:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION --
23:36:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, IN LIGHT OF EVERYBODY
23:36:47 ELSE, YOU KNOW, AND THEIR WISE COMMENTS AND MR. MIRANDA,
23:36:52 I APPRECIATE ALL YOU DO AND ALL YOU'VE DONE FOR THE CITY,
23:36:56 I'LL SUPPORT YOUR MOTION AS LONG AS THE RETURN DATE IS 30
23:37:01 DAYS FROM NOW, GIVE HR PLENTY OF TIME TO ADDRESS THE
23:37:06 ISSUE.
23:37:06 ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT, MR. MIRANDA.
23:37:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I CAN'T TELL HR WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO
23:37:13 DO IT OR WHEN TO DO IT.
23:37:15 I'M ASKING FOR THIS AND IT GOES THROUGH THE SYSTEM IT MAY
23:37:18 TAKE A WEEK, IT MAY TAKE TWO MONTHS.
23:37:20 I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO.
23:37:22 I REALLY DON'T.
23:37:23 I HAVEN'T ASKED THEM.
23:37:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK WE LIKE TO PUT DATES ON
23:37:27 THINGS.
23:37:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 6th WOULD BE 30 DAYS.
23:37:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU'RE OKAY WITH MAY 6th, I'LL
23:37:33 SUPPORT YOUR MOTION.
23:37:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M FINE WITH MAY 6th.
23:37:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 6th UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
23:37:38 >>LUIS VIERA: SHOULD WE WORKSHOP THIS?
23:37:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER
23:37:41 MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CITRO, CORRECT?
23:37:44 ALL RIGHT.
23:37:45 ALL IN FAVOR AYE.
23:37:47 ANY OPPOSED?
23:37:48 AYE.
23:37:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
23:37:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY.
23:37:58 I DIDN'T HEAR THE CLERK DECLARE THE VOTE.
23:38:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE THE VOTE?
23:38:04 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH MIRANDA AND
23:38:07 CITRO BEING THE SECOND.
23:38:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I DID NOT VOTE FOR IT.
23:38:11 IT WAS NOT UNANIMOUS.
23:38:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET'S HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE, IF I MAY,
23:38:20 MR. CHAIRMAN.
23:38:23 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
23:38:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
23:38:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
23:38:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
23:38:30 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
23:38:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
23:38:32 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
23:38:35 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH MANISCALCO VOTING NO.
23:38:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO, I'LL HAND YOU THE
23:38:40 GAVEL.
23:38:41 I HAVE TWO MOTIONS.
23:38:42 FIRST IS I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A
23:38:44 COMMENDATION TO TAMPA PRIDE FOR THEIR CONTINUED
23:38:46 COMMITMENT TO DEMONSTRATE DIVERSITY AS A COMMUNITY.
23:38:49 THIS COMMENDATION WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE DIVERSITY
23:38:53 PARADE ON SATURDAY, MAY 22nd.
23:38:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
23:38:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
23:39:01 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
23:39:02 ALL IN FAVOR?
23:39:04 ANY OPPOSED?
23:39:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
23:39:07 THE LAST ONE IS I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A
23:39:10 COMMENDATION TO LaCHONE DOCK WHO WILL BE RETIRING FROM
23:39:13 THE CITY AFTER NEARLY 18 YEARS OF SERVING THE CITIZENS IN
23:39:17 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
23:39:18 I'D LIKE TO PRESENT THIS COMMENDATION TO LaCHONE NEXT
23:39:21 THURSDAY APRIL 15 BECAUSE APRIL 16 WILL BE HER LAST DAY.
23:39:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
23:39:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
23:39:29 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
23:39:31 ALL IN FAVOR?
23:39:32 ANY OPPOSED?
23:39:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
23:39:36 CAN I GET A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE?
23:39:39 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
23:39:40 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
23:39:42 ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
23:39:43 WE ARE ADJOURNED.
23:39:44 THANK YOU.
23:39:45 [ADJOURNED]
23:39:59
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.