TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JUNE 10, 2021
6:00 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
18:07:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: -- FOR JUNE 10, 2021 NOW IN SESSION.
18:07:32 ROLL CALL PLEASE.
18:07:33 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
18:07:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
18:07:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
18:07:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
18:07:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
18:07:49 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER AND VIERA ADVISED THEY WILL BE A
18:07:52 LITTLE LATE, BUT THEY WILL BE HERE VIRTUALLY THIS
18:07:52 EVENING.
18:07:57 MR. SHELBY, CAN YOU GIVE THE HOUSE RULES OF THE CITY
18:07:58 COUNCIL, PLEASE.
18:08:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, MR. CHAIR.
18:08:04 MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY ATTORNEY.
18:08:08 JUNE 10 OF ALL CITY HALL FOR TONIGHT'S QUASI-JUDICIAL
18:08:13 AND LAND USE RELATED MATTERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHICH
18:08:15 IS HELD DURING THE COVID-19 STATE OF EMERGENCY.
18:08:19 THE MEETING IS CONDUCTED LIVE WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM
18:08:23 PRESENT IN CHAMBERS.
18:08:26 I BELIEVE COUNCILMAN VIERA WILL BE APPEARING VIRTUALLY
18:08:27 WHEN HE DOES ARRIVE.
18:08:30 IN RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS, MEMBERS OF
18:08:33 THE PUBLIC ARE ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY
18:08:37 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA
18:08:39 TECHNOLOGY OR CMT.
18:08:43 TONIGHT'S MEETING IS HELD WITHIN THE ACCORDANCE OF THE
18:08:46 EMERGENCY RULES OF PROCEDURES AND IS AMENDED BY
18:08:54 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020-490 AND 2021-241.
18:08:58 PUBLIC AND CITIZENS OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH THIS ON
18:09:02 CABLE STATION 640, FRONTIER CHANNEL 15, AND ON THE
18:09:06 INTERNET AT TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
18:09:07 ONE WORD.
18:09:10 NOW THERE ARE MULTIPLE WAYS FOR THE PUBLIC TO
18:09:13 PARTICIPATE IN A HYBRID PUBLIC HEARING ON
18:09:14 QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER.
18:09:18 AND ONE WAY IS TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY THROUGH CMT.
18:09:22 THAT REQUIRES PREREGISTRATION AND THOSE INSTRUCTIONS
18:09:28 ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
18:09:32 AND THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THESE MEETINGS AND THE NOTICES
18:09:35 FOR THESE MEETINGS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ON THE
18:09:38 CITY'S WEB PAGE, THE CITY COUNCIL'S WEB PAGE AT
18:09:42 TAMPA.GOV/CITYCOUNCIL.
18:09:42 ONE WORD.
18:09:47 NOW IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE VIA CMT REMOTELY, THE
18:09:50 PUBLIC MUST HAVE ACCESS TO A CMT DEVICE SUCH AS A
18:09:53 TABLET OR COMPUTER EQUIPPED WITH A CAMERA OR
18:09:55 MICROPHONE.
18:10:01 THESE SPECIFIC TWO-WAY VIDEO VIRTUAL FORMAT.
18:10:06 SMART PHONES AND CELL PHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE BECAUSE
18:10:11 THEY WILL NOT BE ALLOW TODAY SHARE THEIR CAMERA.
18:10:15 WITH REGARD TO OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN ADVANCE,
18:10:21 THOSE HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE TO SUBMIT VIA E-MAIL U.S.
18:10:22 MAIL.
18:10:25 AND THE DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE TO SEE AND TO READ IN
18:10:29 ADVANCE BEFORE THE MEETING AND THE INSTRUCTIONS AGAIN
18:10:32 ARE AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
18:10:39 FINAL NOTE, IF YOU WERE PARTICIPATING BY THE GO TO
18:10:42 MEETING PLATFORM, THERE IS A CHAT BOX.
18:10:45 PLEASE BE REMINDED MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT CHAT BOX
18:10:49 IS NOT TO BE USED COMMUNICATING WITH CITY
18:10:52 COUNCILMEMBERS OR ANYBODY ELSE WITH THE SUBSTANCE OF
18:10:56 TONIGHT AGENCIES ONLY FOR TECHNICAL ISSUES AND BRINGING
18:11:00 TO LIGHT ANY TECHNICAL ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE SOLVED.
18:11:03 FINALLY, COUNCIL, REQUEST FOR THOSE TESTIFYING TONIGHT
18:11:04 AT THE HEARING.
18:11:06 IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND
18:11:11 YOU ARE REPRESENTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, WILL
18:11:14 YOU PLEASE STATE IN YOUR COMMENTS TO INFORM CITY
18:11:15 COUNCIL.
18:11:18 THAT CONCLUDES MY COMMENTS, MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU.
18:11:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: LET'S GO OVER THE HOUSEKEEPING NOTES,
18:11:32 YOU AND STAFF, PLEASE, SIR.
18:11:36 >> HOUSEKEEPING NOTE, ITEM NUMBER 4 ON THE AGENDA
18:11:40 CANNOT BE HEARD DUE TO A MISNOTICE.
18:11:44 ITEM 4, PLEASE TAKE OFF OF THE AGENDA.
18:11:47 >> MOTION TO MOVE, PLEASE.
18:11:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL IN FAVOR.
18:11:49 OPPOSED.
18:11:53 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
18:11:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
18:12:01 >>ZANE HUSAIN: CAN WE PLEASE SWEAR IN.
18:12:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER ONE -- I.T., WE CAN GET
18:12:08 HIS VOLUME UP.
18:12:12 I CAN'T HEAR HIM.
18:12:14 >>ZANE HUSAIN: CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
18:12:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF WE CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:12:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 1-10, MINUS 4.
18:12:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:12:28 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
18:12:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THAT THE PEOPLE ON THE
18:12:32 SECOND FLOOR HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:12:32 THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
18:12:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
18:12:39 >>ZANE HUSAIN: STAFF HAS NOT SWORN IN.
18:12:41 CAN I PLEASE SWORN.
18:12:44 >>CLERK: CAN YOU RAISE YOUR HAND.
18:12:47 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE
18:12:49 WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
18:12:50 >> YES.
18:13:02 >>CLERK: THANK YOU.
18:13:05 >> ALL RIGHT, GOOD EVENING, ZANE HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT
18:13:06 COORDINATION.
18:13:21 CASE NUMBER 1, REZ-21-06, 6008 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE
18:13:23 FROM CI TO PD.
18:13:25 TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:13:29 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS.
18:13:39 CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN?
18:13:42 CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
18:13:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.
18:13:47 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING
18:13:48 COMMISSION STAFF.
18:13:50 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:13:56 FIRST CASE IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT PUBLIC
18:13:59 SERVICE IS PROVIDED BY NORTH ARMENIA BY HART ROUTE 16
18:14:03 THAT CONNECTS THE SUBJECT SITE FROM THE TRANSFER CENTER
18:14:06 AND BRITON PLAZA.
18:14:09 SUBJECT SITE IS NOT WITHIN A KNOWN NEIGHBORHOOD
18:14:12 ASSOCIATION AND NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
18:14:15 AN AREA MAP OF THE SURROUNDING SITE AND PROPERTIES.
18:14:18 IT IS OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR ON THE WEST PORTION
18:14:22 OF NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE WHICH CONTAINS PREDOMINANTLY
18:14:24 NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
18:14:29 THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THE
18:14:31 SUBJECT SITE.
18:14:35 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:14:40 THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE -- WITHIN THE CC-35
18:14:41 DESIGNATION.
18:14:47 THIS SHOULD ALSO EXTEND OVER TO -- THE ADJACENT PARCEL
18:14:50 TO THE WEST WHICH IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-6
18:14:57 FUTURE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AND
18:14:59 BOND READS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE FOR HILLSBOROUGH
18:15:00 COUNTY.
18:15:04 THERE IS CC-35 PREDOMINANTLY ALONG ARMENIA AVENUE.
18:15:08 AND THEN THERE IS RESIDENTIAL-10 A COUPLE OF BLOCKS TO
18:15:14 THE EAST AND BLOCKS TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:15:17 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE PROPOSED
18:15:20 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST IS
18:15:22 INCONSISTENT WITH THE SEVERAL OF THE MIXED USE POLICIES
18:15:27 DUE TO LACK OF INTERNAL CONNECTIONS.
18:15:31 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS CONCERNS OF
18:15:32 ACCESSIBILITY.
18:15:37 AND ENSURE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND
18:15:39 TRANSIT STOPS ARE PROVIDED.
18:15:43 PEDESTRIAN BETWEEN BUILDINGS ONE AND TWO AND NONE OF
18:15:47 BUILDING THREE AND THE EXISTING 10,000-SQUARE-FOOT
18:15:47 BUILDING.
18:15:50 NOT CLEAR HOW PEDESTRIANS WILL SAFELY NAVIGATE BETWEEN
18:15:52 USES WITHIN THE SITE.
18:15:59 THIS LAND USE POLICY 16.2.6 ENCOURAGES BUSINESS
18:16:02 ENTRANCES TO BE CONNECTED TO A PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
18:16:04 BUILDING ENTRANCES ARE NOT RECORD ON THE SITE PLAN AND
18:16:08 DOES NOT PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO BUILDINGS
18:16:12 ONE AND TWO WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS POLICY AND
18:16:16 LAND USE POLICY 152.6.
18:16:21 GIVEN THE PD PROPOSES OFFICE USES IN ADDITION TO
18:16:24 FACTORY USES AND IN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AND TRANSIT
18:16:29 EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
18:16:31 THESE CONCERNS ARE ON REVISED PLANS.
18:16:34 BASED ON CONVERSATION, PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS IT
18:16:38 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:16:45 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
18:16:46 ANY QUESTIONS.
18:16:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MADAM CLERK, NOTE THAT MR. DINGFELDER
18:16:50 HAS ARRIVED.
18:16:53 >>CLERK: I HAVE GOT IT, YES.
18:16:56 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
18:16:57 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU, DANNY.
18:17:03 MAY I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN?
18:17:04 WONDERFUL.
18:17:06 CAN EVERYONE SEE MY SCREEN?
18:17:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.
18:17:12 >>ZANE HUSAIN: CASE NUMBER REZ-21-06.
18:17:19 THE APPLICANT AND OWNER IS JEREL MCCANTS, 6008 NORTH
18:17:19 ARMENIA AVENUE.
18:17:24 PROPOSED REZONING FROM CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO PD,
18:17:25 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAREHOUSE.
18:17:28 NO PROPOSED WAIVERS.
18:17:31 LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN HERE, YOU WILL SEE THE
18:17:34 PROPOSAL IS WORTH THREE WAREHOUSES HERE.
18:17:37 ONE, TWO AND THREE WHERE MY CURSORS ARE.
18:17:41 THREE STRUCTURES CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 10,400 SQUARE
18:17:42 FEET.
18:17:46 WHILE RETAINING THE EXISTING 10,000-SQUARE-FOOT
18:17:47 STRUCTURE TO THE SOUTH.
18:17:54 THE TOTAL SITE HAS ACREAGE OF 1.9 ACRES AND THE
18:17:57 REQUIRED PARKING ON THE SITE IS 62 SPACES AND THE
18:18:01 APPLICANT IS PROPOSING HERE 28 SPACES.
18:18:06 SO A WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED AND MUST BE RECEIVED --
18:18:09 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.
18:18:12 LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN -- OR LOOKING AT THE OVERHEAD
18:18:15 AERIAL VIEW HERE, THE SITE IS ACTUALLY SPLIT WITH THE
18:18:16 CITY AND THE COUNTY.
18:18:20 SO THE CITY IS ON THE EAST SIDE AND THE COUNTY AS YOU
18:18:24 SEE THIS LINE IS SEPARATED IN THE PROPERTY ON THE WEST
18:18:26 SIDE HERE.
18:18:33 ALL ACCESS COMES OFF NORTH ARMENIA TO THE SITE.
18:18:37 TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE WEST HENRY AVENUE, WEST CLIFTON
18:18:44 AND TO THE NORTHWEST HANNA, WEST PARIS.
18:18:47 THE PROPOSED SETBACKS OF THE STRUCTURE ARE TO THE
18:18:51 NORTH, YOU HAVE 11.2 FEET.
18:18:52 SOUTH, 5.1.
18:18:55 TO THE EAST 35 FEET.
18:18:59 AND TO THE WEST YOU HAVE 21 FEET.
18:19:04 ALL THE SURROUNDING USES ARE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
18:19:06 AND ALSO COMMERCIAL TO THE EAST.
18:19:13 YOU HAVE SINGLE FAMILY ALSO SCATTERED TO THE SOUTH.
18:19:18 MOVING ALONG, SECOND SLIDES, YOU HAVE THE ELEVATIONS OF
18:19:25 THE WAREHOUSES.
18:19:29 AND ALSO YOU HAVE THE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
18:19:32 SO THE PICTURES TO THE VERY LEFT IS THE EXISTING.
18:19:36 ALSO TO THE -- THE PICTURE IN THE CENTER IS ALSO THE
18:19:39 EXISTING SITE, BUT PROPOSED BUILDING ARE GOING TO BE
18:19:40 PLACED.
18:19:48 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, WE HAVE NEW USED TIRES SHOP.
18:19:51 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE TAX SERVICE REFUND
18:19:52 SHOP.
18:19:54 AND TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE THOSE RENTAL
18:19:58 APARTMENTS TO THE NORTH.
18:20:00 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE.
18:20:03 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT AND FIND THE REQUEST
18:20:06 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT
18:20:06 CODE.
18:20:09 PLEASE REFERENCE FINDINGS FROM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
18:20:13 RELATED TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
18:20:14 IMMEDIATE AREA.
18:20:17 IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
18:20:20 THE APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS MUST BE
18:20:22 COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT DURING THE FIRST AND SECOND
18:20:26 READING OF ORDINANCE AS STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET.
18:20:29 THANK YOU AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:20:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
18:20:32 ANY QUESTIONS?
18:20:37 WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
18:20:40 >> HELLO, HELLO.
18:20:41 YES, GOOD EVENING.
18:20:47 YES, ONE CORRECTION I WANTED TO NOTE THROUGH THE STAFF
18:20:50 ANALYSIS THAT WE ARE REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS --
18:20:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I AM SORRY TO
18:20:52 INTERRUPT.
18:20:55 IF WE CAN HAVE HIS NAME FOR THE RECORD.
18:20:59 >> THIS IS JEREL MCCANTS.
18:21:06 I AM JEREL MCCANTS, THE AGENT TO THE OWNER ALLIED
18:21:07 PROPERTY HOLDINGS.
18:21:11 WE ARE REQUESTING A CHANGE FROM CI ZONING TO PD.
18:21:15 THE AREA OUTLINED IN RED IS THE PROPOSED AREA WHICH IS
18:21:20 CONTROLLED BY THE CITY AND FRONTS ALONG ARMENIA AVENUE.
18:21:25 THE PARCEL TO THE EAST IS CONTROLLED BY THE COUNTY.
18:21:29 THE PURPOSE OF OUR REZONING IS THAT THIS SITE FACES AN
18:21:32 UNIQUE CONDITION WHICH WE HAVE -- WHICH IS A REASON FOR
18:21:38 OUR REZONING BASED ON -- ON THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
18:21:43 THE AREA OUTLINED IN RED IS THAT REAR PARCEL THAT IS
18:21:47 CONTROLLED BY THE COUNTY THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANY ACCESS
18:21:51 TO ANY THOROUGHFARE OR ANY LOCAL ROAD.
18:21:55 SO IT IS -- IF IT IS CENTRALLY LANDLOCKED.
18:22:00 SO WE ARE ONLY PROPOSING TO USE THE PD FOR THE
18:22:04 CITY-OWNED LOT.
18:22:09 THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE -- OF THAT PARCEL THAT
18:22:11 IS CONTROLLED BY THE CITY THAT FRONTS ALONG ARMENIA
18:22:14 AVENUE IS PRIMARILY VACANT LOT.
18:22:16 THIS IS THE VIEW TO THE NORTH WHERE YOU CAN SEE BEYOND
18:22:20 THE MULTIFAMILY COMPLEX.
18:22:23 AND THE VIEW TO THE SOUTH WHERE YOU CAN SEE BEYOND
18:22:31 RESIDENTIAL AND ALSO ABUTS ON TO COMMERCIAL.
18:22:37 THIS IS THE FRONT FACADE OF THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE THAT
18:22:39 WE ARE PROPOSED TO MAINTAIN.
18:22:41 THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE.
18:22:44 AND THE USE WILL CONTINUE CURRENTLY AS THE WAREHOUSE
18:22:49 AND ABUT ON TO ARMENIA AVENUE AND THIS WAREHOUSE IS
18:22:56 ABUTTING TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL.
18:22:59 THIS IS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE VIEW OF THE SAME WAREHOUSE
18:23:05 ORIENTED TO THE NORTH WHERE WE INTEND TO PROVIDE OUR
18:23:14 SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED WAREHOUSES.
18:23:20 FURTHERMORE, PURPOSE FOR REZONING IS A SUFFICIENT AND
18:23:23 SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND TO INTEGRATE THAT LAND AND
18:23:26 IMPROVE AND ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT AROUND IT.
18:23:30 BASED ON THE SITE PLAN DESIGN, AND WE ARE TRYING TO
18:23:35 INCORPORATE AND USE INGENUITY AND INNOVATION INTO THE
18:23:38 SITE PLAN ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT WE ALSO
18:23:41 WILL SHOW THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, PRESENT
18:23:45 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT WILL BE COMPLEMENTING TO
18:23:51 THE COMMUNITY.
18:23:56 THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE OF
18:23:59 ARMENIA AVENUE AND THE THREE PROPOSED WAREHOUSES AND
18:24:02 ALSO THE PARCEL THAT IS CONTROLLED BY THE COUNTY.
18:24:05 WE ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO PROVIDE RETENTION AND GREEN
18:24:06 SPACE.
18:24:13 WE PROVIDED PROPOSED PARKING AND ACCESS WITHIN THE SITE
18:24:16 TO THE WAREHOUSE WHICH ALREADY HAS ACCESS TO ARMENIA
18:24:20 AND CREATE A NEW ACCESS FROM ARMENIA TO THE PROPOSED
18:24:24 PARKING AREA.
18:24:29 WE COMPUTED OUR PARKING BASED ON A WAREHOUSE FORMULA
18:24:34 AND SUCCEEDED THE REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING FOR A
18:24:35 WAREHOUSE.
18:24:39 HERE IS A LARGE PLAN THAT SHOWS THE PROPOSED
18:24:44 DEVELOPMENT, THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE.
18:24:48 OUR CONTAINMENT FROM TRASH COLLECTION.
18:24:52 WE CREATED ALSO THE VEHICLE TURNS FOR LARGE VEHICLES
18:25:00 FOR THE SANITARY, FOR TRAVEL RETRIEVAL, AND ALSO FOR
18:25:04 FIRE TRUCK ACCESS AND TURN AROUND, WHICH WAS
18:25:07 CONSISTENT.
18:25:12 THE TWO WAIVERS WE ARE REQUESTING IS A REDUCTION TO THE
18:25:16 BUFFER THAT IS FROM TEN FEET TO EIGHT FEET ON THE
18:25:18 NORTHERN BOUNDARY.
18:25:24 ALL OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA WAS MET.
18:25:28 THE SECOND WAIVER WAS A REDUCTION IN PARKING DUE TO THE
18:25:31 UNAVAILABILITY OF THE LOT THAT IS CONTROLLED BY THE
18:25:37 COUNTY.
18:25:43 THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WE ARE COMPLEMENTING WITH
18:25:49 STUCCO AND WITH BRICK-FACED STUCCO BANDING, OVERHEAD
18:25:55 DOORS, STOREFRONT DOORS AND WINDOWS.
18:26:00 THIS WILL BE PREENGINEERED METAL BUILDING AND FOLLOW IN
18:26:07 SIMILAR STYLE TO THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS.
18:26:10 THIS IS A BUILDING TO THE SOUTH THAT IS SMALLER THAN
18:26:14 THE TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE ORIENTED EAST-WEST ON THE
18:26:21 NORTHERN BOUNDARY.
18:26:24 IN CONCLUSION, WE BELIEVE WE MET THE CONDITIONS BASED
18:26:27 ON THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
18:26:30 OUR SITE PLAN HAS BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT.
18:26:35 THE DENSITY WE ARE NOT EXCEEDING BASED ON THE LAND USE
18:26:37 CATEGORY.
18:26:40 OUR REGULATIONS, WE ARE NOT -- WE HAVE NO ADVERSE
18:26:41 EFFECT ON THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY.
18:26:46 WE ARE ENHANCING IT BASED ON EXISTING PHOTOS YOU SAW
18:26:46 PREVIOUSLY.
18:26:49 WE MET ALL THE DEVELOPMENTS FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
18:26:57 OUR SITE PLAN AND OUR ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION.
18:27:00 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
18:27:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:27:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. MCCANTS.
18:27:12 I DON'T -- I GUESS I NEED TO ASK STAFF FIRST IF THERE
18:27:16 IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN STAFF REPORT AND THE
18:27:21 PRESENTATION WE JUST HEARD AS RELATED TO PARKING.
18:27:29 BECAUSE THE STAFF REPORT SAYS 62 SPACES REQUIRED, 25
18:27:32 SPACES PROVIDED.
18:27:35 SO WHAT ARE WE HEARING?
18:27:37 ZANE?
18:27:39 >>ZANE HUSAIN: CORRECTION OF THE STAFF REPORT.
18:27:43 AND TO THE POWERPOINT SLIDE, THERE ARE TWO WAIVERS
18:27:47 HERE: REDUCTION TO THE BUFFER AND REDUCTION OF PARKING.
18:27:54 AND THIS WILL NOW BE CONSIDERED INCONSISTENT BY STAFF.
18:27:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MCCANTS, GOING TO YOU THEN, AND
18:28:02 I AM LOOKING AT PAGE A-3 OF YOUR -- OF YOUR PD SITE
18:28:03 PLAN.
18:28:08 ARE YOU SAYING YOU ARE PROVIDING THE 62 SPACES?
18:28:10 OR ARE YOU ACKNOWLEDGING THAT --
18:28:13 >> NO, YES, WE ARE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR
18:28:17 THE REDUCTION IN PARKING.
18:28:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW MANY SPACES ARE YOU PROVIDING
18:28:22 BECAUSE WHEN I LOOK AT YOUR SITE PLAN, IT LOOKS LIKE
18:28:29 YOU GOT 62 SPACES NUMBERED.
18:28:33 >> THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN INCLUDED THE INCORPORATION OF
18:28:36 THE COUNTY LOT WHICH WE DID MEET, AND WE WERE
18:28:39 INSTRUCTED BY THE COUNTY WHICH WAS THE REASON FOR THE
18:28:42 CONTINUANCE THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW PARKING ON THE
18:28:46 COUNTY-CONTROLLED LOT AND WE COULD ONLY USE THAT REAR
18:28:49 PARCEL THAT IS LANDLOCKED FOR RETENTION.
18:28:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU HAVE A SUBSTITUTE PAGE, A-3
18:28:57 OR --
18:28:57 >> NO.
18:29:01 THIS WAS THE FINAL PAGE THAT WAS SUBMITTED THAT IS ON
18:29:03 THE ELMO.
18:29:05 WE REMOVED THE PARKING --
18:29:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET'S SEE THAT AGAIN THEN.
18:29:11 THAT MUST BE A DIFFERENT -- IT IS A DIFFERENT A-3 THEN
18:29:15 WAS PROVIDED MAYBE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO?
18:29:19 >> YES, BUT THIS WAS SUBMITTED AS THE -- WHEN WE FOUND
18:29:23 OUT THAT THE COUNTY WOULD NOT ALLOW PARKING ON THEIR --
18:29:25 ON THE PARCEL THAT IS CONTROLLED.
18:29:34 WE UPDATED THE SITE PLAN AND THE -- AND THE TRASH AND
18:29:39 FIRE AUTO TURN THAT WE HAD TO ASK FOR A REDUCTION IN
18:29:41 PARKING TO FIT THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE PARCEL THAT IS
18:29:42 CONTROLLED BY THE CITY ONLY.
18:29:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:29:47 SO IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PARKING REQUIREMENT
18:29:53 FOR A WAREHOUSE IS DERIVED FROM THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
18:29:53 --
18:29:56 >> YES --
18:29:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT ARE EXPECTED TO BE AT THE
18:29:59 WAREHOUSE.
18:30:01 YOU MAY HAVE A WAREHOUSE AND TWO PEOPLE IN THE WHOLE
18:30:04 WAREHOUSE, BUT IN THIS CASE I THINK THERE IS SOME
18:30:08 INDICATION OFF BUNCH -- WELL, EVEN THIS PAGE SAYS 58
18:30:11 OCCUPANTS.
18:30:14 >> I USE THAT TO INTENTIONALLY EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS
18:30:20 TO TRY TO PLOT THE WAREHOUSES ON A HIGHER PARKING RATIO
18:30:22 THAN -- THAN THE FACTOR.
18:30:27 SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT WAREHOUSING FACTOR IS .6 TO THE
18:30:31 MAXIMUM STAFF THAT WILL BE AT THAT FACILITY DURING THE
18:30:34 TIME OF DAY WHENEVER HOURS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY THE
18:30:36 APPLICANT.
18:30:42 SO -- SINCE THEY ARE SHELL BUILDINGS, I -- I ONLY USED
18:30:44 A HIGHER COUNT.
18:30:48 SO USED .6 TIMES THE SQUARE FOOT OF THE BUILDING TO
18:30:53 OBTAIN A HIGHER NUMBER EVEN THOUGH WHOEVER CHOOSES TO
18:30:57 RENT OUT ONE OF THE WAREHOUSES, THEY WILL HAVE MORE
18:31:02 THAN ENOUGH PARKING BASED ON WHATEVER USE THEY HAVE.
18:31:05 THEY MAY HAVE FIVE PEOPLE WORKING.
18:31:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU CREATED YOUR OWN
18:31:12 INCONSISTENCY BY OVERESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF
18:31:13 EMPLOYEES?
18:31:15 >> WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ALLOWING FOR
18:31:19 PARKING FOR THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE IN THE SOUTH AND
18:31:24 THREE NEW WAREHOUSES.
18:31:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DO -- HAVE
18:31:30 SOMEONE THAT NEEDS MORE PARKING SPACES.
18:31:33 IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OVERFLOW?
18:31:35 WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GO?
18:31:37 AND WILL THEY BOTHER ANY NEIGHBORS.
18:31:39 >> THAT IS NOT WHAT WE WANTED TO DO AND WHEN WE
18:31:43 ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED, WE WERE GOING TO USE THAT
18:31:47 LANDLOCK PORTION FOR OVERFLOW PARKING AND THAT IS THE
18:31:50 WHOLE RATIONAL FOR CREATING ADDITIONAL PARKING AND
18:31:54 HANDICAP PARKING TO EXCEED THE REQUIREMENT BECAUSE
18:31:57 THERE MAY BE PEAK TIMES, CERTAIN TIMES OF DAY WHERE
18:32:01 THERE MAY BE MORE PEOPLE FREQUENTING ONE OF THE
18:32:04 WAREHOUSES AND ALL PACED ON THE USE.
18:32:06 SO IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE USE OF WAREHOUSING
18:32:10 SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN MOST OTHER USES DUE TO THE
18:32:13 FUNCTIONALITY OF WAREHOUSES ONLY BEING SHIPPING AND
18:32:19 RECEIVING OR JUST TYPICAL STORAGE.
18:32:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE LAST QUESTION TO STAFF.
18:32:27 OTHER THAN THE TECHNICAL DEFICIENCY IN PARKING, DO YOU
18:32:31 HAVE A PLANNING OBJECTION TO WHAT IS BEING OFFERED HERE
18:32:37 AS PLANNERS NOT AS -- NOT IN REGARD TO, YOU KNOW,
18:32:38 EXACTLY WHAT THE CODE SAYS.
18:32:43 I KNOW THE CODE MAY SAY 62 AND HE IS EVERYTHING 25 AND
18:32:44 THAT SORT OF THING.
18:32:45 >> I UNDERSTAND.
18:32:49 THE INCONSISTENCY IS BASED ON THOSE TRANSPORTATION
18:32:51 FINDINGS.
18:32:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU -- OTHERWISE, YOU ARE OKAY
18:32:56 WITH IT?
18:32:57 >> YES.
18:32:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:33:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:33:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WANT TO KNOW FROM STAFF WHAT DOES
18:33:05 A WAREHOUSE MEAN?
18:33:09 A BIG BUILDING WITH NOBODY IN IT?
18:33:14 OR GET A WAREHOUSE ZONING AND PUT A FACTORY AND HAVE 30
18:33:16 PEOPLE WORKING.
18:33:17 I DON'T KNOW THAT ANSWER.
18:33:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: STAFF?
18:33:23 >> I WILL GET ON MEDIA THE DEFINITION FOR YOU.
18:33:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE CURRENT ZONING, MR. MIRANDA, IS
18:33:32 COMMERCIAL INTENSE THAT DOES ALLOW LIGHT MANUFACTURING.
18:33:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SURE, BUT ONE BUILDING, I GUESS --
18:33:37 I AM TALKING TO MYSELF.
18:33:40 DON'T WANT THE ORIGINAL BUILDING -- WHEN BUILT THREE
18:33:59 OTHERS THAT KICKS OFF THE PARKING PROBLEM.
18:34:06 >>ZANE HUSAIN: WAREHOUSE IS PRINCIPLE USE OF CONCISE
18:34:09 PRODUCTS OF MATERIALS FOR FEE OR CHARGE OR DISTRIBUTION
18:34:12 TO OTHER LOCATIONS OPERATING BY THE SAME BUSINESS OR
18:34:12 ESTABLISHMENT.
18:34:17 A WAREHOUSE MAY INCLUDE ACCESSORY WHOLESALE SALES, BUT
18:34:22 SHALL NOT INCLUDE RETAIL SALES OR MINI WAREHOUSES.
18:34:29 THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF THE CODE.
18:34:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BUT IT DOES INCLUDE MANUFACTURING?
18:34:37 >>ZANE HUSAIN: NO, IT DOES NOT INCLUDE MANUFACTURING,
18:34:37 NO.
18:34:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I CAN HARDLY HEAR YOU.
18:34:42 I THINK YOUR MIC IS WAY LOW.
18:34:44 >>ZANE HUSAIN: SORRY ABOUT THAT.
18:34:47 IT DOES NOT INCLUDE MANUFACTURING.
18:34:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU.
18:34:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN THAT CASE WHEN IT COMES BACK FOR
18:34:55 SECOND READING AT THE TOP OF THE FIRST PAGE IT SAYS --
18:35:00 IT SAYS AN PROPOSED WAREHOUSE FACTORY AND OFFICE.
18:35:03 SO YOU MIGHT WANT TO GET THEM TO CHANGE THAT -- THAT
18:35:06 TITLE ON THE TOP JUST SO NO CONFUSION 20 YEARS FROM
18:35:11 NOW.
18:35:13 >>ZANE HUSAIN: ALL RIGHT.
18:35:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
18:35:17 ALL RIGHT.
18:35:22 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR FOR THIS ITEM?
18:35:27 ANYONE ON SECOND FLOOR FOR THIS ITEM?
18:35:32 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THIS IS AILEEN ROSARIO, GROWTH
18:35:33 MANAGEMENT.
18:35:38 WE DON'T HAVE NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK.
18:35:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED?
18:35:44 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
18:35:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL IN FAVOR.
18:35:47 OPPOSED.
18:35:49 MR. MANISCALCO, WILL YOU MIND.
18:35:51 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:35:53 I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
18:35:58 CONSIDERATION IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 6008 NORTH
18:36:01 ARMENIA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND
18:36:04 DESCRIBED IN ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CI
18:36:07 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
18:36:11 WAREHOUSE PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND I BELIEVE THE
18:36:15 APPLICANT HAS MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF FOR COMPETENT AND
18:36:17 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS
18:36:19 CONDITIONED AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT
18:36:22 WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE AND I FIND
18:36:26 THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT IMPACT THE PUBLIC
18:36:29 HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE.
18:36:33 IF WE CAN -- WHAT IS THE WORD, MANUFACTURING?
18:36:35 AND THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH THAT.
18:36:39 SO WE KNOW THERE IS NO MANUFACTURING IN THIS WAREHOUSE
18:36:39 SETTING.
18:36:42 JUST FOR CLARITY --
18:36:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I INQUIRE, MR. CHAIRMAN, WHAT
18:36:45 ABOUT THE OFFICE?
18:36:47 WAS THAT PART OF THAT?
18:36:48 I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR.
18:36:51 IN TERMS THE USE, MR. DINGFELDER, DID YOU HAVE AN
18:36:53 ISSUE?
18:36:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK WE HAVE TO ASK STAFF IF
18:36:59 THIS IS AN ALLOWED USE IN SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN
18:37:01 DESCRIBED AS A, QUOTE, WAREHOUSE.
18:37:04 SOMETIMES DO YOU HAVE A SMALL LITTLE OFFICE ATTACHED TO
18:37:07 A WAREHOUSE.
18:37:10 >> DO WE --
18:37:12 >> MOVE TO OPEN.
18:37:12 >> SECOND.
18:37:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA WILL REOPEN.
18:37:18 SECOND.
18:37:19 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:37:20 OPPOSED?
18:37:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF WE CAN INQUIRE OF STAFF.
18:37:28 >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN MANASSE, LAND DEVELOPMENT.
18:37:29 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, YOU ARE CORRECT.
18:37:33 OFFICE USE, NOT REALLY A USE BUT ACCESSORY BECAUSE THE
18:37:37 WAREHOUSE WILL BE THE USE AND THE PROPOSED USE AND HAVE
18:37:41 THE ANCILLARY OFFICE IN A WAREHOUSE SETTING.
18:37:44 SO STAFF DOESN'T UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN OF THE
18:37:46 MANUFACTURING ON THE SITE PLAN AND SHOULD BE REMOVED
18:37:50 BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING AND THE ONLY USE
18:37:56 FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE WAREHOUSE USE.
18:37:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
18:38:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WITH THE TECHNICAL STAFF TURN UP
18:38:07 THE VOLUME FOR OUR ZONING STAFF BECAUSE ZANE WAS FAINT
18:38:11 AND RYAN WAS FAINT.
18:38:13 >>ZANE HUSAIN: TEST, TEST.
18:38:16 CAN YOU HEAR ME BETTER NOW?
18:38:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT IS GETTING THERE.
18:38:21 >>ZANE HUSAIN: I WILL STEP MY SIDE UP TOO.
18:38:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEFORE YOU CLOSE JUST TO CONFIRM FOR
18:38:26 MR. MANISCALCO'S SAKE, THERE ARE REVISIONS THAT ARE
18:38:29 REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IN ADDITION
18:38:32 TO THAT CHANGE, THAT'S CORRECT?
18:38:34 >>RYAN MANASSE: THAT IS CORRECT AND BASED OFF THE
18:38:35 STAFF REPORT.
18:38:36 THE ADDITION.
18:38:40 I THINK THE WAIVERS -- SORRY IF I DON'T HAVE THAT IN
18:38:40 FRONT OF ME.
18:38:46 BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT, MR. SHELBY.
18:38:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:38:50 SECOND, MR. DINGFELDER.
18:38:52 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:38:54 OPPOSED.
18:38:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST TO ADD ON --
18:38:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST TO ADD TO THE MOTION FOUND
18:39:04 WITH THE PORTION OF ARMENIA WITH LAND USE POLICY 15.2.1
18:39:07 AS WELL AS THE REVISIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE BETWEEN
18:39:09 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
18:39:14 WE ALREADY SAID THE -- TO STRIKE THE MANUFACTURING AS
18:39:19 WELL FROM THE SITE PLAN OR FROM THE -- THE REVISION
18:39:20 SHEET.
18:39:22 AND I BELIEVE THAT'S IT.
18:39:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO HAS MOVED THE ITEM.
18:39:26 SECOND?
18:39:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WILL SECOND IT JUST WITH A
18:39:29 COMMENT.
18:39:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. DINGFELDER.
18:39:34 YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:39:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A BIG WAIVER OF PARKING SPACES BUT
18:39:39 A STRANGE CODE PROVISION AND THE APPLICANT HAS EVEN
18:39:43 ACKNOWLEDGED I THINK IF HE HAD COME TO US AND SAID,
18:39:48 YEAH, WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE 15 OR 20 EMPLOYEES,
18:39:50 THEN THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES WILL DROP
18:39:51 ACCORDINGLY.
18:39:54 THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THIS PARTICULAR
18:39:58 WAREHOUSE PARKING REQUIREMENT WORKS.
18:40:00 AND SO ANYWAY.
18:40:03 IN LIGHT OF THAT, I THINK HE CREATED HIS OWN HARDSHIP
18:40:08 IN A POSITIVE WAY AND I CAN ACCEPT AND ENDORSE THE
18:40:11 MOTION.
18:40:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED AND COUNCILMAN
18:40:16 SECOND.
18:40:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:40:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:40:19 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
18:40:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:40:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:40:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.
18:40:33 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AND
18:40:35 CITRO VOTING NO.
18:40:42 SECOND READING.
18:40:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER TWO.
18:40:50 >>ZANE HUSAIN: 20-102 FOR 3604 WEST IOWA AVENUE
18:40:53 PROPOSING FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
18:40:56 I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:41:01 DANNY?
18:41:03 >>DANNY COLLINS: HI, EVERYONE, DANNY COLLINS WITH OUR
18:41:04 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:41:06 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:41:09 THE NEXT CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS.
18:41:14 MORE SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE INTERBAY NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:41:20 AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS SKY VIEW PARK HALF A MILE
18:41:21 EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:41:26 PUBLIC TRANSIT SPOT 1400 FEET TO THE WEST ALONG SOUTH
18:41:28 DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
18:41:33 THE SITE WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE.
18:41:35 AN AERIAL MAP OF SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
18:41:37 PROPERTIES.
18:41:40 THE SUBJECT SITES ARE OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR ON
18:41:43 SOUTH SIDE OF IOWA AVENUE.
18:41:46 AND JUST TO THE EAST OF -- SORRY TO THE WEST OF S.
18:41:50 HIMES AVENUE.
18:41:52 PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.
18:41:55 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP.
18:41:59 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:42:03 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE OF SINGLE
18:42:09 FAMILY ATTACH THE RESIDENCES SURROUNDED BY -- ONE BLOCK
18:42:12 OF THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 20.
18:42:16 AND JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS LAND
18:42:20 UTILIZED -- LAND RECOGNIZED UNDER THE PUBLIC-SEMI
18:42:22 PUBLIC DESIGNATION.
18:42:24 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION
18:42:26 AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
18:42:27 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:42:31 REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE
18:42:36 RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG THIS PORTION OF WEST HUDSON
18:42:38 AVENUE.
18:42:41 AND SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICY NOTICE COMPREHENSIVE
18:42:44 PLAN WITH HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
18:42:50 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON
18:42:54 UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO HELP MEET THE NEED OF TAMPA'S
18:42:55 PRESENT POPULATION.
18:42:59 FINALLY THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG-RANGE
18:43:02 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE
18:43:02 LAND USE.
18:43:04 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
18:43:07 STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
18:43:08 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:43:11 AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE
18:43:12 FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:43:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
18:43:19 CITY STAFF.
18:43:20 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU.
18:43:24 CAN I HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN, PLEASE.
18:43:32 THANK YOU, ZANE HUSAIN HERE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION,
18:43:37 REZ-20-102.
18:43:38 APPLICANT IS BLAKE FRAZIER.
18:43:45 PROPOSED FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO RS-50,
18:43:46 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
18:43:50 AND A EUCLIDIAN ZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE NO WAIVERS
18:43:52 ARE PERMITTED HERE.
18:43:56 LOOKING AT THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE SITE OUTLINED IN
18:43:57 THE RED.
18:43:59 TO THE NORTH IOWA AVENUE.
18:44:00 TO THE EAST S. HIMES AVENUE.
18:44:03 TO THE WEST SOUTH STERLING AVENUE.
18:44:05 AND BELOW, OHIO AVENUE.
18:44:10 THE REZONING IS TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF TWO TASK FORCE
18:44:11 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
18:44:13 IF YOU SEE THE SURVEY HERE.
18:44:19 THAT THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 100 X 147 FEET.
18:44:25 A TOTAL LOT AREA OF -- OF 14,700 SQUARE FEET.
18:44:31 THE ONE PROPERTY HERE LOCATED TO THE WEST -- OF THE
18:44:36 WEST IOWA AND S. HIMES AVENUE INTERSECTION HERE IS LOT
18:44:36 4.
18:44:44 AND HERE TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE LOT 3 OF BLOCK 3.
18:44:48 MOVING ALONG HERE, YOU SEE THE PLAT.
18:44:53 AS YOU SEE LOT 3 AND 4 ARE LABELED OR SHOWN HERE WITH
18:44:56 THE GREEN BORDER.
18:45:00 AS YOU LOOK AT THE CONFIRMING MAP, YOU SEE THE
18:45:03 SURROUNDING AREA BEING SURROUNDED TO THE NORTH, WEST
18:45:07 AND EAST WITH THE RS-60 ZONING AND TO THE SOUTH, YOU
18:45:13 WILL SEE RS-50 AND RS-60 ZONING ALSO AS YOU SEE THE LOT
18:45:21 RIGHT HERE.
18:45:25 THE PLAT WAS ORIGINALLY DONE IN 1914.
18:45:32 IT HAD LOTS VARYING FROM 50 FEET TO 138 FEET IN WIDTH
18:45:37 FROM 139 FEET TO 294 FEET.
18:45:44 148 -- 148 ZONING LOTS WERE ACTUALLY ANALYZED HERE.
18:45:50 61% OF THOSE LOTS HAD A WIDTH OF GREATER THAN 60 FEET.
18:45:56 AND 39% OF THOSE LOTS HAD A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR
18:45:57 LESS.
18:45:59 PURSUANT TO THE REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
18:46:05 PATTERN, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 20 TOTAL LOTS.
18:46:07 SIX OR 30% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH THE
18:46:12 WIDTH OF 60 FEET FOR GREATER AND 14 OR 70% OF THOSE
18:46:16 LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR
18:46:17 LESS.
18:46:23 THE BLOCK OF WEST IOWA AVENUE CONTAINS 16 TOTAL ZONING
18:46:27 LOTS, 56% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH 60
18:46:32 FEET OF WIDTH OR GREATER AND 44% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE
18:46:38 BEEN IDENTIFIED AS WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
18:46:42 BASED ON THOSE ANALYSIS, STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST
18:46:45 INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF
18:46:50 THE STUDY AREA BLOCK AND BLOCK FACE.
18:46:53 MOVING ALONG HERE, YOU WILL SEE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
18:46:57 THIS IS THE DEAD-ON STRAIGHT PICTURE OF THE SITE.
18:47:00 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU SEE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
18:47:03 FAMILY, ALSO YOU SEE THIS SECTION.
18:47:08 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, YOU SEE RESIDENTIAL
18:47:11 SINGLE-FAMILY INTERSECTION TO THE WEST.
18:47:14 AGAIN, RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF AFTER REVIEW OF THE
18:47:16 APPLICATION FOUND THIS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
18:47:18 TAMPA CODE ORDINANCES.
18:47:21 THANK YOU, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:47:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
18:47:24 ANY QUESTIONS?
18:47:29 I GUESS WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
18:47:32 >> HI, MY NAME IS BLAKE FRAZIER.
18:47:35 I AM THE AGENT FOR THIS REZONING APPLICATION.
18:47:39 FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE CITY STAFF AND COUNTY
18:47:41 STAFF FOR PREPARING THIS REPORT.
18:47:46 AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A EUCLIDIAN REZONE FROM RS-60 TO
18:47:52 RS-50 TO SPLIT THE PARCEL WITH THE PLATTED LOT LINES
18:47:54 AND CONFORM TO THE PROPERTIES THAT SURROUND US.
18:47:58 HONESTLY I WAS PRETTY SURPRISED EARLIER THIS WEEK WHEN
18:47:59 I RECEIVED STAFF REPORT.
18:48:04 I PERSONALLY HAVE REZONED SEVERAL PROPERTIES WITHIN
18:48:06 THIS IMMEDIATE AREA INCLUDING THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE
18:48:13 STREET AT 39 -- SORRY, 3609 WEST IOWA.
18:48:17 AND ALL THOSE STAFF REPORTS WERE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH
18:48:21 THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE ORDINANCES WERE
18:48:23 ADOPTED FOR THE REZONE.
18:48:26 ALSO, I USED TO WORK FOR A COMPANY THAT HAS DONE
18:48:30 SEVERAL REZONES IN THERE PRIOR TO MY TENURE IN THEM,
18:48:34 AND EACH OF THOSE REPORTS WE WERE FUNDS CONSISTENT AND
18:48:38 ORDINANCES WERE ADOPTED PER THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
18:48:42 SO AFTER RECEIVING THE REPORT, I DECIDED TO DO A STUDY
18:48:43 OF MY OWN.
18:48:47 YOU KNOW I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT MY FINDINGS FOR THE
18:48:51 OVERALL AREA AND CYCLE BACK TO THE STAFF REPORTS AS WE
18:48:55 CONCLUDE.
18:48:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:49:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:49:01 POINT OF ORDER.
18:49:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DOES THE ACTION HAVE ANYTHING TO DO
18:49:09 WITH -- THIS IS JUST YOUR OWN?
18:49:10 >> YES.
18:49:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WAS CONCERNED OF A POTENTIAL
18:49:15 CONFLICT.
18:49:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OKAY, SIR.
18:49:22 >> ON MY FIRST DIAGRAM, IT SHOWS THE OVERALL AREA THE
18:49:27 ORIGINAL PLAT FROM 1914, EXCLUDING SOME PROPERTIES DOWN
18:49:33 HERE THAT HAVE BEEN REPLATTED INTO ANOTHER SUBDIVISION.
18:49:39 AND IF YOU END UP COUNTING ALL THESE RS-50S AND PDS UP
18:49:43 HERE, YOU WILL SEE THERE IS AT LEAST 17 REZONES WITHIN
18:49:45 THIS OVERALL AREA.
18:49:50 THE NEXT DIAGRAM I HAVE IS THE -- IS THE OVERALL PLAT
18:49:51 AS WELL.
18:49:55 AND I HAVE SEPARATED THAT PLAT INTO THE COMMERCIAL
18:50:01 PROPERTIES, MULTIFAMILY, MUNICIPALLY-OWNED PROPERTIES,
18:50:04 AND PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN REPLATTED TO OTHER
18:50:05 SUBDIVISIONS.
18:50:08 THE COMMERCIAL IDENTIFIED IN PURPLE.
18:50:12 THE MULTIFAMILY IN ORANGE.
18:50:15 THE MUNICIPALLY OWNED PROPERTIES IN RED.
18:50:17 AND THE GRAY PROPERTIES DOWN HERE ARE THE PROPERTIES
18:50:21 THAT HAVE BEEN REPLATTED TO OTHER SUBDIVISIONS AND THIS
18:50:25 LIGHT GRAY STRIP IS THE EXPANSION OF SOUTH DALE MABRY
18:50:26 HIGHWAY.
18:50:33 NEXT, I ALSO PRESENT A REPORT THAT TOTALS THE NUMBER
18:50:38 OF LOTS BY BLOCK, THE NUMBER OF LOTS WITH FRONT
18:50:44 FOOTAGES LESS THAN 59 FEET -- YEAH, 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
18:50:48 A NUMBER OF LOTS WITH 60 FEET OR MORE OF LOT FRONTAGE
18:50:53 AND THE PERCENT OF THE NONCONFORMING LOTS PER THE
18:50:55 OVERALL SUBDIVISION.
18:51:01 OR THE LOTS THAT WOULD BE 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
18:51:06 THE TOTALS ARE OBVIOUSLY AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS REPORT.
18:51:10 GOING BACK TO THE PLAT, I WILL LIKE TO POINT OUT TWO
18:51:12 THINGS.
18:51:16 THE FIRST IS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION I INCLUDED
18:51:21 THIS SOUTHEASTERN PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL PLAT.
18:51:24 YOU KNOW, THE GREAT MAJORITY OF THESE LOTS HAVE
18:51:27 ACTUALLY BEEN -- ARE NOW IDENTIFIED AS SOME SORT OF
18:51:33 REPLAT REVISION OR RESUBDIVISION OF THE INTERBAY PLAT,
18:51:36 INCLUDING THIS PORTION DID NOT WORK OUT IN MY FAVOR.
18:51:40 IT ACTUALLY LOWERS THE PERCENTAGE OF NONCONFORMING LOTS
18:51:42 BY TWO AND A HALF PERCENT.
18:51:46 BUT THEN ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT ON THIS PLAT
18:51:50 THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE LOTS EXCLUDING THE
18:51:54 SOUTHEASTERN PORTION WOULD BE PLATTED AS 50 FOOT LOTS
18:51:56 THROUGHOUT.
18:52:02 ONLY THE -- THE TWO WESTERNMOST LOTS ON THESE FIVE
18:52:08 BLOCKS ARE 60 FEET OR MORE AND THEN A HANDFUL OF LOTS
18:52:13 WITHIN BLOCK SIX AND SEVEN ARE 60 FEET FOR GREATER AS
18:52:18 WELL, MAINLY DUE TO THE IRREGULARITY OF HOW THE
18:52:23 ROADWAYS WORK THROUGH THOSE SPECIFIC BLOCKS.
18:52:27 ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION AND IN THIS REPORT THAT
18:52:33 I -- THAT WE -- WE FOUND THAT 74 -- OR 74 LOTS WITHIN
18:52:39 THE OVERALL AREA HAD EITHER OBTAINED RS-50 AND PD -- PD
18:52:43 ZONING TO COMPLY WITH THEIR SPECIFIC LOT FRONTAGES.
18:52:51 AND THIS WAS 15% OF THE OVERALL STUDIED AREA.
18:52:55 NOW I WOULD LIKE TO TRANSITION BACK OVER TO THE -- TO
18:53:01 THE STAFF REPORT FOR THE PREVIOUS REZONE THAT I HAD
18:53:08 GOTTEN AT 3609 WEST IOWA AVENUE ACROSS THE STREET
18:53:13 WHICH WE WERE FOUND CONSISTENT AND THAT LOT WAS REZONED
18:53:15 TO RS-50.
18:53:18 I HAVE THE OVERALL MAP HERE.
18:53:22 AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT AREA IS A MUCH SMALLER
18:53:24 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.
18:53:26 MUCH SMALLER SAMPLE SIZE.
18:53:32 SO IF WE WERE ACTUALLY ABLE TO FOLLOW THIS -- THIS
18:53:37 STYLE ANALYSIS PATTERN AND EXAMINE ONLY THE
18:53:43 NONREPLATTED PORTIONS OF THE ORIGINAL -- OF THE
18:53:48 ORIGINAL PLAT, WE WOULD IDENTIFY NINE DIFFERENT BLOCKS
18:53:52 FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAT INCLUDING THE BLOCK THAT THE
18:53:54 SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ON.
18:54:00 THAT WILL BE BLOCKS THREE, SIX, SEVEN, 23, 24, 29, 30,
18:54:02 31 AND 32.
18:54:07 ON THESE -- ON THE SUBJECT BLOCKS, THERE ARE 103 TOTAL
18:54:08 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
18:54:11 56 OF THOSE LOTS ARE NONCONFORMING.
18:54:15 47 OF THOSE LOTS ARE CONFORMING TO RS-60.
18:54:23 SO THAT WILL BE 54.37% NONCONFORMING TO RS-60 WITHIN
18:54:26 THE IMMEDIATE BLOCKS SURROUNDING OUR PARCELS.
18:54:30 HE BELIEVE THAT THIS DATA PROVES THAT THIS EUCLIDIAN
18:54:34 REZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
18:54:38 I WOULD ASK THAT COUNCIL TAKE THESE FINDINGS INTO
18:54:42 CONSIDERATION WHILE DETERMINING, YOU KNOW, APPROVAL.
18:54:44 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
18:54:47 I WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS, IF NEEDED.
18:54:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
18:54:51 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:54:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
18:54:57 JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, MR. FRAZIER.
18:55:02 WHEN YOU PUT UP THE -- THAT ONE ILLUSTRATION THAT HAS
18:55:05 -- I THINK FOUR DIFFERENT TABLES.
18:55:07 DID YOU HAVE THAT ONE HANDY?
18:55:10 >> YES, SIR, IT IS ON THE SCREEN NOW.
18:55:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO ATTRIBUTION.
18:55:15 WHO GENERATED THIS?
18:55:17 DID DO YOU THIS YOURSELF?
18:55:20 >> YES, THAT IS A SELF- STUDY.
18:55:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ON THAT POINT, HAVE YOU ALREADY
18:55:26 SUBMITTED THESE DOCUMENTS INTO THE RECORD?
18:55:27 >> NOT AS OF THIS TIME, NO, SIR.
18:55:34 WE GOT THE STAFF REPORT, I BELIEVE, ON MONDAY SO I HAVE
18:55:35 NOT UPLOADED IT YET.
18:55:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. SHELBY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE
18:55:40 HAVE BEEN DOING IN THE PAST WITH REGARD TO VARIOUS
18:55:43 CASES, BUT I GUESS WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WHEN PEOPLE
18:55:46 HAVE DOCUMENTS ON THE SECOND FLOOR, THAT THESE
18:55:52 DOCUMENTS GET TO THE CLERK.
18:55:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, WE CAN MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR
18:55:54 THAT.
18:55:58 HE HAS THE ABILITY TO E-MAIL THEM WITHIN 24 HOURS TO
18:56:05 THE ADDRESS OF THE LOCATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS.
18:56:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT SOUNDS A LITTLE LOOSEY-GOOSEY.
18:56:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, THAT IS TRUE, BUT THE OBLIGATION
18:56:14 IF THE PETITIONER WANTS THAT ON THE RECORD.
18:56:19 IF HE HAS THESE DOWNSTAIRS ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
18:56:19 >> YES, SIR.
18:56:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU WISH -- IS THIS YOUR ONLY COPY
18:56:24 OR DO YOU HAVE OTHER COPIES.
18:56:27 >> IT IS MY ONLY COPY BUT I WILL BE HAPPY TO BRING IT
18:56:27 UPSTAIRS.
18:56:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I PERSONALLY DON'T NEED IT.
18:56:31 YOU HAVE SHOWN IT TO US.
18:56:35 I WANT TO MAKE SURE, MR. SHELBY, AS YOU DO THAT THE
18:56:37 RECORD IS CLEAR ON ALL OF THE CASES.
18:56:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I CAN GO DOWN AND PUTS THEM IN THE
18:56:43 RECORD IF HE WISHES OR IF HE WANTS TO KEEP THE
18:56:43 ORIGINAL.
18:56:46 I DON'T HAVE THE INSTRUCTIONS IN FRONT OF ME.
18:56:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU GUYS CAN FIGURE IT OUT MAYBE
18:56:50 AFTER THE CASE IS OVER.
18:56:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, I THINK IT IS A GOOD POINT,
18:56:54 COUNCILMAN.
18:56:58 MR. CHAIRMAN, IF YOU CAN JUST BEAR WITH ME.
18:57:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MY OTHER QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN,
18:57:07 IS TO STAFF, WHILE MR. SHELBY IS LOOKING INTO THOSE
18:57:08 LEGALITIES.
18:57:13 STAFF, YOU HEARD A DIFFERENT ANALYSIS FOR THIS.
18:57:18 DO YOU HAVE ANY RESPONSE?
18:57:21 >>RYAN MANASSE: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE,
18:57:22 LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:57:26 THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
18:57:29 THE MAP IN THE STAFF REPORT IS THE CURRENT MAP TO DO
18:57:30 THEIR STAFF ANALYSIS.
18:57:35 WHERE WE TAKE A 13-FOOT RADIUS AND BREAK IT DOWN FOR
18:57:39 THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE EXISTING LOT OR BLOCK.
18:57:42 AS YOU PROBABLY SEE IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, WE EXCLUDED
18:57:46 SOME CG PORTION PROPERTIES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE
18:57:48 THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED OF COUNCIL TO GET A
18:57:52 FURTHER DEFINED STAFF ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT
18:57:58 PATTERN OF THE BLOCK -- BLOCK AND THE MAP THAT THE
18:58:00 APPLICANT IS SHOWING IS NOT SOMETHING THAT STAFF WOULD
18:58:03 REVIEW UPON, THE MAP OR SHOWN IN THE STAFF REPORT IS
18:58:07 WHAT WE ARE BASING OUR STAFF ANALYSIS ON TO ANSWER YOUR
18:58:09 QUESTION, SIR.
18:58:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER?
18:58:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOT HAVING THEM SIDE BY SIDE THAT
18:58:27 WE BEING THE CITY STAFF, OR YOU BEING THE CITY STAFF
18:58:32 ARE USING A TIGHTER OR SMALLER AREA AND DID HE GO MUCH
18:58:33 BROADER THAN THAT.
18:58:35 IS THAT WHAT WE ARE SEEING, RYAN?
18:58:35 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, SIR.
18:58:39 YOU KNOW IF YOU GO DIFFERENT WAYS ON MAPS, IT CAN PULL
18:58:42 IN DIFFERENT LOTS THAT CAN AFFECT THE NUMBERS OF THE
18:58:44 OVERALL STAFF ANALYSIS.
18:58:47 THE NARROWER VERSION.
18:58:52 THE 1320 RADIUS AND NARROW IT DOWN WE WON'T CROSS OVER
18:58:55 SOUTH DALE MABRY ON THE CONFORMING MAP.
18:59:05 TO THE EAST THORPE AND MAIN STREET AND WE START
18:59:09 BREAKING IT DOWN TO THE BLOCK FACE AND SUCH AND GET THE
18:59:11 OVERALL CONSISTENCY FINDING.
18:59:14 ON THE STAFF REPORT ON THE CONFORMING MAP PAGE.
18:59:18 YES TO THE SOUTH ON OHIO, A LOT OF LOTS THAT ARE 50 TO
18:59:22 54 FEET IN THE BLUE, BUT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE
18:59:24 SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE STAFF ANALYSIS ON BLOCK AND
18:59:30 BLOCK FACE, THOSE WOULD BE SKEWED AND IT WILL GO AFTER
18:59:32 THE WIDTH, THE PERCENTAGES.
18:59:35 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:59:37 THANK YOU.
18:59:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
18:59:42 MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
18:59:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WE HAVE TAKEN THE OPPORTUNITY.
18:59:52 MISS ROSARIO TAKEN THOSE DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOCOPIED AND
18:59:56 JUST FOR MR. FRAZIER AND OTHER PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE,
18:59:59 OTHER APPLICANTS IN THE RULES OR THE INSTRUCTION IT IS
19:00:03 STATES JUST SO I CAN STAY AND MAKE IT CLEAR, APPLICANTS
19:00:08 AND ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS WHO SUBMIT SHARING EVIDENCE
19:00:14 SHARING THEIR SCREEN MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRONIC
19:00:18 COPY DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING -- THE MAIL ADDRESS,
19:00:26 COUNCILQUASISUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.GOV WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
19:00:27 THE HEARING.
19:00:31 THOSE INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE CITY OF COUNCIL
19:00:32 WEB PAGE.
19:00:34 IF YOU CAN GIVE THEM TO THE CLERK.
19:00:37 >> I WILL SURE TO DO THAT.
19:00:45 THE DOCUMENTS, MR. FRAZIER, ARE BEING HAND THE OUT TO
19:00:46 MAKE PART OF THE RECORD.
19:00:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICANT?
19:00:54 SECOND FLOOR?
19:00:57 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, ZONING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
19:01:00 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK OF THIS ITEM.
19:01:01 THANK YOU.
19:01:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MADAM CLERK, ANY REGISTERED --
19:01:08 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR THIS ITEM.
19:01:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:01:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE.
19:01:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
19:01:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL IN FAVOR.
19:01:16 ANY OPPOSED.
19:01:19 MR. CARLSON, CAN YOU READ NUMBER TWO.
19:01:23 >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I PASS PLEASE.
19:01:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO.
19:01:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE NUMBER REZ-20-12, AN ORDINANCE
19:01:34 PRESENTED FOR FIRST REEDING IN CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL
19:01:39 VICINITY OF 3604 WEST IOWA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
19:01:43 FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION FROM
19:01:46 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL
19:01:51 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
19:01:54 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATES THE PETITIONER HAS MET THE
19:02:01 BURDEN OF PROOF AND CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE OBJECTIVE
19:02:06 POLICY 1.3.4 AND IS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE OBJECTION
19:02:10 9.2, WHICH INTENDS TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS AN ADEQUATE
19:02:15 AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AND
19:02:17 PROJECTED POPULATION.
19:02:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
19:02:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:02:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:02:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:02:26 >>BILL CARLSON: NO.
19:02:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:02:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO.
19:02:35 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:02:36 DINGFELDER AND CARLSON VOTING NO.
19:02:40 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15 AT
19:02:45 9:30 A.M.
19:02:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM 3.
19:02:50 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU, SIR, ITEM NUMBER 3,
19:02:54 REZ-21-22 FOR 804 WEST PARK AVENUE.
19:02:59 PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS-60 TO PD, RESIDENTIAL
19:03:01 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
19:03:07 I WILL NOW PASS IT ALONG TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
19:03:09 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS.
19:03:21 CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?
19:03:23 DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:03:24 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:03:28 THE NEXT CASE THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND
19:03:32 RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:03:37 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS LOCATED 1,000
19:03:39 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:03:42 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC TRANSIT IS LOCATED THREE BLOCKS
19:03:49 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE WEST COLUMBIA DRIVE.
19:03:51 IN LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
19:03:54 AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
19:03:56 PROPERTIES.
19:03:59 IT IS JUST ON WEST SIDE OF WEST PARK AVENUE AND
19:04:02 OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR SURROUNDED BY
19:04:05 PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL USES.
19:04:09 THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:04:16 THE PROJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE
19:04:18 DESIGNATION.
19:04:22 RESIDENTIAL 20 ONE BLOCK TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT
19:04:30 SITE.
19:04:32 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEW THE APPLICATION
19:04:35 AND SHOWED NO ADVERSE IMPACTS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND
19:04:40 REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SIMILAR IN FORM,
19:04:45 HEIGHT OF THE -- THIS IMPORTANT OF THE -- THE QUESTION
19:04:48 SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
19:04:51 AS IT RELATES TO HOUSING POPULATION.
19:04:56 THE NEW COMPANY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES HOUSING
19:05:02 ON UNOCCUPIED LAND.
19:05:06 AND FINALLY REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG-RANGE
19:05:10 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ENCOURAGED FOR LAND USE
19:05:11 DESIGNATION.
19:05:13 BASED OFTEN THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING
19:05:15 COMMISSION FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
19:05:17 OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:05:19 THIS CLONE CLOUDS MY PRESENTATION.
19:05:23 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:05:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. COLLINS.
19:05:31 MOVE ON TO THE CITY STAFF.
19:05:35 >>ZANE HUSAIN: ZANE HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT
19:05:40 COORDINATION, GOING OVER REZ-21-22.
19:05:42 THE REPRESENTATIVE AND APPLICANT NAME IS STEVE
19:05:44 MICHELINI.
19:05:46 804 WEST PARK AVENUE.
19:05:51 PROPOSED ZONING FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO
19:05:54 PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED.
19:05:58 TWO WAIVERS BOTH RELATED TO TREES.
19:06:04 REQUEST TO PAY TREE TRUST FUND FOR MITIGATION TREES
19:06:09 THAT CANNOT BE PLANTED ON-SITE AND TO REDUCE THE TREES
19:06:14 PRESERVED ON A NONWOODED SITE FROM 50% TO 39%.
19:06:19 LOOKING AT THE OVERALL VIEW OF THE SITE HERE MARKED IN
19:06:20 RED.
19:06:23 AS YOU CAN SEE, NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE COMES DOWN HERE TO
19:06:24 THE EAST.
19:06:28 TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE WEST PARK AVENUE.
19:06:32 DIAGONAL HERE TO THE NORTH -- TO THE NORTHWEST AND TO
19:06:36 THE SOUTHWEST YOU HAVE NORTH RIDGE AVENUE COMING DOWN
19:06:41 AND TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE WEST ROSS AVENUE.
19:06:45 AS YOU SEE HERE ON THE SURVEY, YOU HAVE LOT ONE AND LOT
19:06:46 TWO ON BLOCK E.
19:06:49 AS YOU KNOW, THEY ARE TRYING -- THE APPLICANT WOULD
19:06:53 LIKE TO PUT TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON -- ONE SINGLE
19:06:55 FAMILY HOME ON EACH LOT.
19:06:58 THE PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST
19:07:03 PARK AVENUE AND NORTH GLEN DRIVE, LOT 1, THEY ARE
19:07:11 PROPOSING A TWO-STORY STRUCTURE CONTAINING 2026 ON
19:07:15 FIRST FLOOR AND 2175 SQUARE FEET ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
19:07:20 TO THE SOUTH, LOT TWO, A TWO-STORY STRUCTURE BEING
19:07:25 PROPOSED CONTAINING 1547 SQUARE FEET ON THE FIRST FLOOR
19:07:29 AND 1547 SQUARE FEET ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
19:07:33 LOT ONE HERE HAS A WIDTH OF 55 FEET AND DEPTH OF 128
19:07:34 FEET.
19:07:39 AND TOTAL AREA 7172 SQUARE FEET.
19:07:43 AND LOT TWO TO THE SOUTH HAS A WIDTH 55 FEET AND LOT
19:07:49 DEPTH OF 129 FEET WITH A TOTAL AREA OF 7137 SQUARE
19:07:51 FEET.
19:07:56 THE SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS, TO LOT ONE, 41 FEET.
19:07:57 EAST, 25 FEET.
19:07:59 NORTH, 7 FEET.
19:08:00 SOUTH, 5 FEET.
19:08:06 FOR LOT TWO, TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE WEST 60 FEET
19:08:07 AND 10 INCHES.
19:08:09 EAST, 25 FEET.
19:08:14 NORTH EIGHT FEET AND SEVEN FEET TO THE SOUTH.
19:08:17 MOVING ALONG HERE, YOU WILL SEE THE PLAT.
19:08:22 YOU WILL SEE LOT 1 AND LOT 2 OUTLINED IN GREEN.
19:08:27 THE SUBDIVISION WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN 1922.
19:08:29 THE SUBJECT APPLICATION SEEKS TO SPLIT THE LOTS OF
19:08:32 RECORD TO CREATE TWO BUILDABLE LOTS HERE.
19:08:41 THE OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDE 282 TOTAL ZONING
19:08:42 LOTS.
19:08:45 138 OF THOSE LOTS OR 49% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH THE
19:08:48 WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER.
19:08:56 51% OF THOSE LOTS, 144 HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR
19:08:56 LESS.
19:08:59 PURSUANT TO THE REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
19:09:03 PATTERN, THE BLOCK HAVE FIVE TOTAL ZONING LOTS.
19:09:06 20% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF
19:09:09 60 FEET OR GREATER.
19:09:16 AND THE OTHER 80% ARE 59.99 OR LESS.
19:09:19 STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF THE
19:09:21 PROPOSED LOTS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING
19:09:26 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA BLOCK AND
19:09:29 BLACK FACE.
19:09:32 LOOKING HERE AT THE ELEVATIONS, YOU HAVE THE SOUTH
19:09:34 ELEVATION.
19:09:37 AND ALSO LOOKING AT THE ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH, YOU
19:09:44 HAVE THE NORTH ELEVATION.
19:09:48 ALSO TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE SOUTH ELEVATION ON THE
19:09:50 SCREEN ABOVE.
19:09:54 AND ALSO NORTH ELEVATION HERE LOOKING AT THE SIDE OF
19:09:56 THE STRUCTURE.
19:09:59 I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES AS YOU CAN
19:10:00 SEE.
19:10:04 PICTURES OF THE SITED, VACANT.
19:10:07 AND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU SEE SINGLE FAMILY
19:10:08 HOMES.
19:10:14 AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE ALSO, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
19:10:17 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
19:10:19 THE APPLICATION AND FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
19:10:22 OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:10:24 PLEASE REFER TO FINDINGS BY TRANSPORTATION IN RELATION
19:10:27 TO THE REQUIRED PARKING WAIVERS ASKED AND ACCESS TO
19:10:28 LOCAL STREET.
19:10:31 IT IS A PLEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
19:10:34 APPLICATION AND MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED OF THE SITE PLAN
19:10:38 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE AS
19:10:39 IDENTIFIED BELOW.
19:10:44 THANK YOU, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:10:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
19:10:48 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:10:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
19:10:55 ZANE, ON NOTE FIVE IN THE STAFF REPORT UNDER NATURAL
19:10:59 RESOURCES AND LOOKING AT THE ONE ON SIRE.
19:11:02 IN REGARD TO REDUCE THE PERCENTAGE OF TREES PRESERVED
19:11:07 ON A NONWOODED SITE FROM 50% TO BLANK PERCENT.
19:11:08 XX PERCENT.
19:11:13 DO WE KNOW -- DO WE NOW KNOW WHAT THAT BLANK PERCENT
19:11:14 IS?
19:11:15 >>ZANE HUSAIN: CORRECT.
19:11:18 MARY IN NATURAL RESOURCES MADE THAT CHANGE TO 39%.
19:11:22 THE PROPOSED WAIVERS FROM 50 TO 39%.
19:11:24 IS THAT CORRECT, MARY?
19:11:25 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
19:11:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU TO BOTH OF YOU.
19:11:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
19:11:31 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE SECOND FLOOR -- THE
19:11:33 APPLICANT, SORRY.
19:11:36 >> YES, SIR, STEVE MICHELINI HERE ON BEHALF OF SHANE
19:11:41 O'NEILL, THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AT 804 WEST PARK
19:11:43 AVENUE.
19:11:47 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED RS-60 AND WE ARE ASKING
19:11:52 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, MAINLY BECAUSE THE WIDTH OF THE
19:11:56 PROPERTIES ARE 55 FEET WIDE; HOWEVER, THE DEPTH OF THE
19:12:01 PROPERTY IS 128 AND 129 FEET RESPECTFULLY.
19:12:07 SO THAT HAS TWO LOTS -- ONE IS 7172 SQUARE FEET AND THE
19:12:14 OTHER IS 73 -- 1137 SQUARE FEET, WHICH EXCEEDS THE
19:12:18 6,000 SQUARE FEET THAT WOULD NORMALLY BE REQUIRED UNDER
19:12:20 RS-60.
19:12:24 THE PROPOSAL IS TO BUILD TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH
19:12:28 TWO-CAR GARAGES AND TWO SPACES IN THE DRIVEWAY FOR EACH
19:12:30 OF THE UNITS.
19:12:36 IT IS BEEN DESIGNATED AS AN EFFICIENT USE OF THE LAND
19:12:37 AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
19:12:41 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT UNITS PER ACRE IS 6.95.
19:12:47 AND THE PROPOSAL UNDER THIS REZONING IS 6.25.
19:12:50 BY THE CITY STAFF, IT HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT,
19:12:52 COMPATIBLE AND APPROPRIATE.
19:12:54 IT IS AN INFILL PROJECT.
19:12:56 THERE ARE NO ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT HAVE BEEN NOTED.
19:13:01 AND THE LONG-RANGE PLAN FINDS IT IS CONSISTENT.
19:13:03 AND BOTH THE CITY STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
19:13:07 STAFF HAVE FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT.
19:13:13 WITH RESPECT TO PROMOTING THE EFFICIENCY AND
19:13:16 SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND ON INFRASTRUCTURE.
19:13:18 THIS WILL IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE AS NECESSARY FOR THE
19:13:21 DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT WILL OCCUR AT THE PERMITTING
19:13:23 STAGE OF THE PROCESS.
19:13:27 WITH RESPECT TO PROMOTING AND ENCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT
19:13:30 WHERE WE ARE APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION.
19:13:34 THIS AREA IS APPROPRIATE FOR IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT AND IT
19:13:35 IS COMPATIBLE.
19:13:38 THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE SURROUNDING FAMILY IS
19:13:41 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THIS WILL MAINTAIN THE
19:13:42 SAME PATTERN.
19:13:45 PROMOTE THE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE, SIZE AND FEATURES OF
19:13:54 ELEMENTS AND WE WILL PUT ON THE OVERHEAD A RENDERING OF
19:13:57 THE -- CAN YOU SEE THAT OKAY.
19:14:02 OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, SO IT IS -- BASICALLY -- A
19:14:08 TAMPA HEIGHTS, HYDE PARK STYLE HOME THAT IS BEING
19:14:08 PROPOSED.
19:14:17 ONE OF THE LOTS IS SLIGHTLY LARGER.
19:14:22 THOSE ARE THE TWO BASICALLY -- YOU NOTED IN THE STAFF
19:14:26 REPORT THERE ARE EXTRAORDINARY SET BACKS BEING PROPOSED
19:14:31 AND THOSE ARE -- TO SAVE TREES AND A AVOID THE
19:14:33 CONFLICTS WITH THOSE TREES.
19:14:38 ALTHOUGH WE ARE AT 39% AND THE 50%.
19:14:40 THEY WORKED ON AS MANY OF THE TREES AS POSSIBLE TO
19:14:44 MAINTAIN THEM.
19:14:48 WITH RESPECT TO THE -- TO THE WAIVERS, THE DESIGN OF
19:14:50 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THE RESPECT TO
19:14:55 THE FACT THAT IT HAS -- IT HAS AN EXTRAORDINARY DEEP
19:14:59 LOT, AND THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MEET THOSE CODES AS --
19:15:04 AS REQUIRED FOR THAT PROPERTY.
19:15:08 THE WAIVES WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WHICH
19:15:27 OTHERS.
19:15:30 >> THE NATURE OF THE PROPERTIES IN THE AREA AND IT WILL
19:15:35 ALSO MAINTAIN THE INFRASTRUCTURE UTILIZATION AND
19:15:38 IMPROVE IT AS NECESSARY IDENTIFIED IN THE -- AS WILL BE
19:15:42 IDENTIFIED IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS.
19:15:44 THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS FOUND THAT THE GOALS AND
19:15:49 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
19:15:53 HAS BEEN MET THROUGH LAND USE OBJECT 2.1, 2.1.2.
19:16:03 OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 9.2, 9.2.1, 9.3, LAND
19:16:14 USE POLICY 9.3.8 AND OBJECTIVE 9.5, 9.5.1, 9.5.3.
19:16:26 1.3.10 AND HOUSING NEEDS 1.3, 1.3.4.
19:16:30 ANALYSIS SHOW NO ADVERSE IMPACTS.
19:16:31 IT IS SUPPORTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
19:16:33 AND IT IS SUPPORTED BY THE CITY STAFF.
19:16:36 WE BELIEVE THIS IS A COMPATIBILITY PROJECT.
19:16:40 IT IS -- IT IS ONE THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FAVORABLY
19:16:44 AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
19:16:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
19:16:48 ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
19:16:49 ANY QUESTIONS?
19:16:52 ANYONE FROM THE SECOND FLOOR?
19:16:56 >>RYAN MANASSE: CHAIR, RYAN MANASSE.
19:16:58 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:17:00 >>RYAN MANASSE: I WANT TO CLEAR THE RECORD, THE LAST
19:17:05 SENTENCE READ BY ZANE OF THE CONSISTENCY FINDING --
19:17:08 THERE IS NO WAIVER WITH REGARD TO THE PARKING WAIVER OF
19:17:09 A LOCAL STREET.
19:17:12 THAT IS A CLARIFICATION THAT NEEDS TO BE ON THE STAFF
19:17:12 REPORT.
19:17:14 THAT IS NOT ACCURATE FOR THIS REPORT.
19:17:21 THE TWO WAIVERS HAVE DESCRIBED AS ZANE MENTIONED
19:17:23 27.3.1.
19:17:25 AND THOSE WERE TWO NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVERS.
19:17:29 I JUST WANTED TO CLEAR THE RECORD.
19:17:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED MR. DINGFELDER.
19:17:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MICHELINI, SO YOUR CLIENT
19:17:38 ACKNOWLEDGES THE -- THE REQUIREMENT TO PAY INTO THE
19:17:42 TREE TRUST FUND FOR THE MITIGATION AND FOR THE
19:17:46 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 50% AND 39%.
19:17:47 >> YES, SIR.
19:17:50 WE ARE COMMITTING TO MAKING THE REVISIONS NECESSARY
19:17:53 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS SHOULD COUNCIL
19:17:56 APPROVE THIS AND PAYING THE NECESSARY FEES FOR NATURAL
19:17:58 RESOURCES.
19:18:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, SIR.
19:18:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
19:18:05 ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
19:18:13 ITEM NUMBER 3.
19:18:19 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
19:18:21 NOBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
19:18:25 ORLANDO GUDES:ANYONE HERE REGISTERED FOR THIS ITEM?
19:18:27 >>CLERK: NO ONE REGISTERED.
19:18:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:18:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA HAS MOVED THE TIME.
19:18:35 MR. CITRO HAS SECONDED.
19:18:35 ALL IN FAVOR.
19:18:36 OPPOSED?
19:18:37 MOTION MOVED.
19:18:41 MADAM CLERK ROLL CALL PLEASE -- SORRY ABOUT THAT.
19:18:45 MR. CARLSON, READ NUMBER 3 FOR US SINCE WE DIDN'T GET
19:18:46 YOU ON NUMBER 2.
19:18:53 >>BILL CARLSON: LIKE TO MOVE FILE NO. REZ-21-22 IN THE
19:18:56 GENERAL VICINITY OF 804 WEST PARK AVENUE IN THE CITY
19:18:59 TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
19:19:02 SECTION 1 ARE FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
19:19:07 RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED
19:19:10 DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
19:19:12 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:19:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
19:19:16 >>BILL CARLSON: THE REVISIONS INCLUDING THE REVISION
19:19:21 SHEET AND -- THERE WAS A WHOLE LOT OF COMPETENT AND
19:19:24 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE APPLICANT FILED REGARDING
19:19:31 ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ITS
19:19:35 CONSISTENCY WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USE.
19:19:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON MOVED IT.
19:19:40 MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT CARMEL CARLSON YES.
19:19:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:19:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:19:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:19:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
19:19:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:19:50 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
19:19:54 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JULY 15 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:19:56 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
19:19:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:19:59 WE ALREADY DEALT WITH ITEM NUMBER 4.
19:20:04 GO TO ITEM NUMBER 5.
19:20:06 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU, SIR.
19:20:12 ZANE HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION REZ-21-26.
19:20:16 5001 WEST PRESCOTT STREET REQUESTING A REZONING FROM
19:20:19 RM-16 TO RM-18.
19:20:21 I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO DANNY WITH THE PLANNING
19:20:21 COMMISSION.
19:20:26 DANNY?
19:20:28 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR
19:20:28 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:20:30 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:20:33 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
19:20:37 AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE PORT TAMPA CITY
19:20:38 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:20:42 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC FACILITY IS LOCATED A QUARTER MILE
19:20:45 TO THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:20:49 TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED TWO MONTHS AT SOUTH WESTSHORE
19:20:50 BOULEVARD.
19:20:53 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION AND
19:20:59 WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
19:21:02 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
19:21:03 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
19:21:06 YOU WILL SEE SHOWN HERE OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR
19:21:11 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST PRESCOTT STREET AND
19:21:12 SOUTH FALL STREET.
19:21:15 IT IS PREDOMINANTLY SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL USES TO
19:21:22 THE NORTH, WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:21:26 THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND SUBJECT UNDER THE
19:21:30 RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
19:21:33 COMMERCIAL 35 TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND
19:21:36 RESIDENTIAL-35 DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH.
19:21:39 TO THE SOUTH IT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, REPRESENTED THINK
19:21:41 ABOUT GRAY COLOR.
19:21:43 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
19:21:45 FOUND IN ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
19:21:46 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:21:51 MULTIFAMILY USES ARE ENCOURAGED WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL
19:21:56 20 LAND USE DESIGNATION TO PROVIDE A HIGHER DENSITY IS
19:21:57 REQUIRED.
19:22:01 OVERALL THE RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE CATEGORY REQUIRES
19:22:05 HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPATIBILITY WITH
19:22:07 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
19:22:11 REZONING THE SITE WILL ALLOW REVISIONS AND PLANS UNDER
19:22:14 THE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND ADDITIONAL HOUSING
19:22:16 OPPORTUNITY FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION.
19:22:20 THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA
19:22:23 AND STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT INSURES NO
19:22:27 NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON HURRICANE -- HURRICANE EVACUATION
19:22:30 TIMES, SHELTER DEMANDS FOR THE RESIDENTS UNDER THE
19:22:34 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACT
19:22:36 IN THE FUTURE.
19:22:38 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
19:22:41 STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
19:22:43 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:22:47 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
19:22:48 ANY QUESTIONS.
19:22:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
19:22:54 CITY STAFF.
19:22:57 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH, ZANE HUSAIN,
19:22:58 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:23:00 REZ 21-26.
19:23:05 THE APPLICANT AND REPRESENTATIVE JON LUM.
19:23:08 PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 5001 WEST PRESCOTT STREET.
19:23:14 REZONING FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO RM-18,
19:23:15 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
19:23:20 THIS BEING A EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST, NO WAIVERS ARE
19:23:23 PERMITTED LOOKING AT THE OVERALL AERIAL VIEW OF THE
19:23:24 SITE.
19:23:27 THE SITE IS DOWN HERE OUTLINED AND BORDERED IN RED.
19:23:35 IT GOES ALONG SIDE SOUTH FALL STREET AND WEST PRESCOTT
19:23:35 STREET.
19:23:40 IF YOU LOOK HERE AT THE OVERHEAD VIEWS THE SURVEYS, YOU
19:23:42 WILL SEE THERE ARE THREE LOTS.
19:23:47 LOTS 6, LOT 7, AND LOT 8.
19:23:51 THE SITE IS CURRENTLY 150 FEET IN LENGTH, 100 FEET IN
19:23:52 WIDTH.
19:23:55 THE TOTAL LOT AREA IS 15,000 SQUARE FEET.
19:23:59 THE PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED BY DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY --
19:24:03 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY STRUCTURE AT THIS MOMENT.
19:24:08 AGAIN, THE SITE IS ALSO ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH
19:24:11 STREET AND WEST PRESCOTT.
19:24:15 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY TO THE
19:24:19 NORTH AND REST IS RM-16 ZONING DISTRICTS.
19:24:22 THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS ARE TO THE EAST
19:24:33 PD AND TO THE SOUTH RM-24 ZONING DISTRICT.
19:24:37 OFF TO THE SITE AND TAKE PICTURES AND SEE THE CURRENT
19:24:40 SITE, CURRENT STRUCTURE HERE.
19:24:44 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU SEE THE RM-24 ZONING
19:24:44 DISTRICT.
19:24:50 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE -- YOU SEE PICTURES THERE.
19:24:53 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, YOU SEE THE SINGLE FAMILY
19:24:53 HOMES.
19:24:59 AND TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU SEE STRUCTURES ABOVE
19:25:02 ALSO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
19:25:05 REVIEW THE APPLICATION AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT
19:25:08 WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
19:25:11 THANK YOU AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:25:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS.
19:25:16 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. HUSAIN, I AM JUST CURIOUS LOOKING
19:25:19 AT THE OVERHEAD -- THE AERIAL.
19:25:21 EXCUSE ME.
19:25:24 THAT IS AN AWFUL BIG PIECE OF LAND.
19:25:31 ARE ALL OF THESE PLOTTED TO PRESCOTT AND NOT FALL?
19:25:34 >> CORRECT, THEY ARE ALL TO PRESCOTT.
19:25:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I AM WONDERING BECAUSE I AM SEEING
19:25:39 HOMES THAT ARE PLOTTED TO FALL.
19:25:40 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:25:43 THANK YOU, MR. HUSAIN.
19:25:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
19:25:49 DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT?
19:25:51 >> YES, I AM ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
19:25:54 STEVE MICHELINI HERE ON BEHALF THE PROPERTY OWNERS 501
19:25:59 WEST PRESCOTT.
19:26:03 AND THESE ARE PROPOSED -- IT'S A RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND
19:26:05 USE CLASSIFICATION, AND ACCORDING TO THE PLANNING
19:26:10 COMMISSION REPORT, MOST OF THE AREA IS DEVELOPED IN A
19:26:12 -- IN A HIGHER DENSITY.
19:26:17 WE ARE REQUESTING THE RM-16 -- SORRY, WE ARE REQUESTING
19:26:24 TO GO FROM RM-16 TO RM-18, WHICH CURRENTLY WE CAN BUILD
19:26:27 5.6 UNITS ON THE PROPERTY.
19:26:31 WE ARE REQUESTING THE RM-16 SO WE CAN BUILD SIX UNITS
19:26:39 WHICH WILL RAISE THE POTENTIAL CAPABILITY TO 6.1.
19:26:44 THE PROPERTY IS -- HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT,
19:26:48 COMPATIBLE AND APPROPRIATE FOR THIS TYPE OF -- OF --
19:26:50 FOR THIS LOCATION.
19:26:53 WE CAN NOT HAVE ANY WAIVERS, SO EVERYTHING REGARDING
19:26:57 TRANSPORTATION, REGARDING LANDSCAPING, REGARDING
19:27:03 STORMWATER ALL HAVE TO BE MET AND WE ARE COMMITTING TO
19:27:06 PROVIDING THE NECESSARY INFORMATION AS REQUIRED
19:27:09 REGARDING EVACUATION PLANS.
19:27:13 THIS IS -- THESE ARE PROPOSED -- WHAT WILL HAPPEN WILL
19:27:18 BE IF IT IS APPROVED THIS EVENING, IS TO BUILD A SERIES
19:27:23 OF -- OF TOWN HOUSES THAT ARE -- THAT ARE FEE SIMPLE
19:27:24 OWNER.
19:27:28 THESE ARE NOT APARTMENTS, BUT FEE OWNERSHIP.
19:27:33 BUT THE CITY STAFF IS NOTED THAT WE ARE SURROUNDED BY
19:27:37 -- OR AT LEAST ON TWO SIDES BY OTHER HIGHER DENSITY
19:27:41 DEVELOPMENTS.
19:27:45 AND YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE.
19:27:49 THESE ARE TOWNHOUSES HERE THAT ARE BUILT IN THE SAME
19:27:50 MANNER.
19:27:54 WE HAVE THIS LARGER APARTMENT PROJECT GOING IN HERE.
19:27:57 AND THEN OTHER TOWN HOUSE PROJECTS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT
19:27:59 THE AREA.
19:28:03 WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION AND THE
19:28:05 LAND USE REVIEW.
19:28:09 FIRST LET ME GO TO THE LAND USE MAP AND SHOW YOU THAT
19:28:14 THIS ENTIRE AREA IS RESIDENTIAL 20.
19:28:16 THERE IS -- THIS PARCEL HERE, WHICH IS BEING REQUESTED
19:28:21 TO GO FROM RM-16 TO RM-18.
19:28:24 AND THESE ARE MUCH HIGHER DENSITIES HERE, HERE, AND
19:28:29 THROUGHOUT THIS WHOLE AREA IS CAPABLE AND ALLOWABLE FOR
19:28:32 TOWNHOUSES OR APARTMENTS, BUT IN THIS CASE WE ARE
19:28:36 PROPOSING FEE SIMPLE -- FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP
19:28:37 STRUCTURES.
19:28:39 AND IF YOU REMEMBER FROM SOME OF THE OTHER DISCUSSIONS
19:28:45 PREVIOUSLY, THE NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA OBJECTED TO
19:28:47 APARTMENTS BECAUSE THERE IS NO PARTICULAR INVESTMENT IN
19:28:49 THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:28:53 THESE PROPERTY OWNERS -- THESE PROPERTIES WILL BE OWNED
19:28:57 BY -- BY INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE AN INVESTMENT AND A STAKE
19:28:58 IN THE PROPERTY.
19:29:01 I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE
19:29:04 IMPROVEMENTS, ALL OF THOSE THAT ARE NECESSARY, WE PAID
19:29:08 FOR INCLUDING ALL OF THE IMPACT FEES THAT ARE ASSESSED
19:29:12 TO THIS PROPERTY WILL ADDRESS ISSUES LIKE STORMWATER,
19:29:16 SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING AND ALL OF THE OTHER APPLICABLE
19:29:22 CODES AND IMPACT FEES INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION.
19:29:25 THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR SIX RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
19:29:28 THAT IS MAXIMUM.
19:29:31 SOME INFORMATION OUT THERE THAT WOULD INDICATE MORE
19:29:33 UNITS BEING CONSIDERED, BUT IT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED
19:29:36 UNDER THIS REZONING CLASSIFICATION THAT IS BEING
19:29:38 PROPOSED.
19:29:41 WITH RESPECT TO THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF
19:29:44 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IT HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE
19:29:48 CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE OBJECTIVE 2.1, WHICH REGULATES
19:29:53 THE LEVELS AND BUILDING INTENSITY OF STANDARD LAND USE
19:29:58 DESIGNATIONS FOR THE AREA WHICH IS PROJECTED TO ABSORB
19:30:02 150,000 EMPLOYEES AND INDIVIDUALS BY 2040.
19:30:07 LAND USE 2.1.1 ENCOURAGES HIGH IMPACT DENSITY
19:30:08 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING CHARACTER.
19:30:11 THIS DOES NOT EFFECT ADVERSELY ANY OF THE SURROUNDING
19:30:15 AREA OR THE CHARACTER OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
19:30:18 LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2.
19:30:23 THE USE OF LIMITED LAND RESOURCES FOR EFFICIENT AND
19:30:29 PURSUE PATTERNS THAT ARE MORE ECONOMICALLY SOUND BY
19:30:32 VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES.
19:30:34 IT CLEARLY MEETS THAT.
19:30:40 THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IS REZ-20 AND BELOW THAT BY
19:30:42 TWO DEVELOPMENT UNITS PER ACRE.
19:30:48 THE OBJECTIVE OF THE OVERALL RESIDENTIAL 9.2 TO ENSURE
19:30:51 ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF PROJECTED
19:30:52 POPULATION.
19:30:57 THE LAND USE 9.2.1, PROTECT AND PROMOTE AND MAINTAIN
19:30:58 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.
19:31:02 THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:31:05 OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTIAL
19:31:09 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES.
19:31:11 THE OVERALL IS COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT
19:31:15 AND SHALL HAVE SUSTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS AND ENSURE THE
19:31:17 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC HEALTH OF THE CITY.
19:31:20 IN THIS RESPECT, THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE TO MEET ALL THE
19:31:23 OF THE CODES NECESSARY AND IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE
19:31:23 AS NEEDED.
19:31:29 SO IF ANY THOSE WATER LINES, SEWER LINES, OR INADEQUATE
19:31:31 OR IF THERE ARE SIDEWALKS THAT ARE MISSING, THEY WILL
19:31:34 ALL HAVE TO BE INSTALLED.
19:31:39 LAND USE POLICY 9.3.8, THE INTENT OF THE CITY THAT IT
19:31:45 WILL BE MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE SO ADJACENT AREAS AND
19:31:48 ASSESS THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL
19:31:50 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND THE CHARACTER OF THE
19:31:55 SURROUNDING AREA AND REQUIRE MITIGATION OF ALL NEGATIVE
19:31:57 OFFSITE IMPACTS.
19:31:59 WE HAVE TO MEET OR EXCEED ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND
19:32:02 THAT WILL BE DEALT WITH AT PERMITTING.
19:32:06 AS I SAID NO WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED AND YOU
19:32:08 CAN ASK -- CANNOT ASK FOR WAIVERS AND YOU STRAIGHT
19:32:11 EUCLIDIAN REZONING.
19:32:15 MULTIFAMILY AREAS INCREASE THE DIVERSITY AND
19:32:17 SUSTAINABILITY IN MULTIFAMILY AREAS.
19:32:21 9.6.1 ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT AND INTENSITY OF
19:32:24 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING TYPES.
19:32:27 THIS IS NOT A HIGH INTENSITY OR HIGH DEVELOPMENT AREA.
19:32:31 THIS IS REQUESTED FOR SIX SINGLE FAMILY SEMI DETACHED
19:32:35 UNITS WITH -- THAT WILL BE -- THAT WILL BE OWNED FEE
19:32:35 SIMPLE.
19:32:39 PROMOTE THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT
19:32:42 WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA STRATEGY, INCREASE THE AVAILABLE
19:32:46 OF HOUSING AND DENSITIES, PROMOTE WALKING AND TRANSIT
19:32:50 AND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
19:32:57 LAND USE POLICY 9.6.3, DESIGNATE ALL MULTIFAMILY AREAS
19:33:00 PREDOMINANTLY OCCUPIED BY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND
19:33:03 GREATER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS DESIRED TO INCREASE
19:33:07 THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND PROMOTE THE DENSITIES AND
19:33:10 INTENSITIES OF THE CITY'S FORMED STRATEGY.
19:33:17 LAND USE POLICY 9.6.4, BALANCE THE OBJECTIVES OF NEW
19:33:19 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE ADEQUATE HOUSING FOR
19:33:22 TAMPA'S RESIDENTS AND EQUALLY IMPORTANT OBJECTIVE
19:33:26 ENSURING THAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH
19:33:27 THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER.
19:33:32 LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY WITH
19:33:35 OPPORTUNITY OF INFILL BY AREAS OF LOW AND MEDIUM
19:33:37 DENSITY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.
19:33:39 CREATE TRANSITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY BETWEEN
19:33:43 SINGLE FAMILY ZONES AND MORE INTENSIVE MULTIFAMILY
19:33:43 ZONES.
19:33:46 AS I POINTED OUT TO YOU A MORE INTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
19:33:49 THAT IS TO THE EAST AS WELL AS TO THE SOUTH OF THE
19:33:50 PROPERTY.
19:33:55 AND SIX UNITS ON -- ON A SINGLE FAMILY OWNERSHIP
19:34:01 CLASSIFICATION DOES EXACTLY THAT.
19:34:08 LAND USE POLICY 9.7 -- 9.7.1 PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY
19:34:12 FOR ATTACHED HOUSING AND SLIGHTLY HIGHER DENSITIES AND
19:34:13 SINGLE FAMILY AREAS.
19:34:16 AND THIS OBVIOUSLY DOES THAT WELL.
19:34:21 LAND USE POLICY 9.7.2 MAINTAIN SINGLE FAMILY
19:34:25 DEVELOPMENT FROM HEIGHT, BULK AND NEW DEVELOPMENT.
19:34:28 WE HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE EXISTING CODE REGARDING
19:34:28 THAT.
19:34:32 AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE RESIDENTIAL 20 CLASSIFICATION,
19:34:34 WE ARE BELOW THAT.
19:34:37 AND IT IS CERTAINLY -- THE DEVELOPMENT AREA IS ALREADY
19:34:39 HIGHER THAN THAT.
19:34:43 ENSURE THAT THE ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE
19:34:47 FOR THE NEEDS OF TAMPA HOUSEHOLDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE
19:34:48 OF ALL NEIGHBORHOODS.
19:34:52 OBJECTIVE 1.3.
19:34:57 HSG 1.3.1 DES I CAN NIGHTS SUFFICIENT LANDS FOR
19:35:00 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TAMPA SHARE REGIONAL HOUSE
19:35:01 HOLD GROWTH.
19:35:04 HURRICANE EVACUATION SHELTERS, DIRECT FUTURE POPULATION
19:35:08 CONCENTRATIONS AWAY FROM THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD TO
19:35:12 ACHIEVE A NO NET INCREASE IN OVERALL RESIDENTIAL
19:35:14 DENSITY AND MEETS THAT RESTRICTION.
19:35:21 CM POLICY 1.1.1, AHA IS THE AREA BELOW THE ELEVATION
19:35:21 CATEGORY OF.
19:35:24 WE HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE NEW FEMA REGULATIONS
19:35:28 RECORDING THAT AND THE COMMITMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE
19:35:31 SIX UNITS PROPOSED WILL BE FULLY INFORMED AND EDUCATED
19:35:33 REGARDING EVACUATION PLANS.
19:35:37 50% OR MORE OF THE PARCEL IS LOCATED IN THE COASTAL
19:35:39 HIGH HAZARD.
19:35:42 THE ENTIRE PARCEL IS CONSIDERED COASTAL HIGH HAZARD.
19:35:46 AGAIN, WE HAVE TO MEET ANY OF THE FLOOD ZONE
19:35:49 REQUIREMENTS AS LAID OUT BY THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE AND
19:35:50 FEMA.
19:35:55 THE CMU POLICY 1.1.4, PURPOSE OF ELEVATING THE PROPOSED
19:35:58 -- PROPOSAL FOR SITE PLANS.
19:36:01 THE FOOTPRINT AND THE ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE CONSIDERED
19:36:04 TO BE WITHIN THE DISTRICT.
19:36:08 THE STAFF ANALYSIS HAS FOUND THAT THIS -- THIS PROPOSAL
19:36:11 IN TERMS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING
19:36:16 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THAT IS DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR
19:36:20 CONSIDERATION OF LOWER AND LOW, MEDIUM, SINGLE-FAMILY
19:36:25 DETACHED, CONDOMINIUMS, TOWN HOMES AND MULTIFAMILY.
19:36:30 RESIDENTIAL 20 ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF FALL,
19:36:33 NORTHERN PORTION OF WEST PRESCOTT AND SOUTH FALL
19:36:33 STREET.
19:36:38 SOUTH SHERRILL STREET PARCEL RECOGNIZED UNDER RULINGS
19:36:44 35 WHICH IS HIGHER AND SOUTH PARCEL UNDER 35
19:36:47 DESIGNATION OR TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:36:50 THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT -- RESIDENTIAL
19:36:55 MULTIFAMILY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20
19:36:58 FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION THAT EXISTS AND THE
19:37:02 PROPOSED ZONING WILL -- I AM GOING TO ABBREVIATE
19:37:03 EXCERPT FROM THIS.
19:37:07 PROPOSED ZONING WOULD ALSO ALLOW CONSIDER UP TO SIX
19:37:10 DWELLING UNITS TO THE MAXIMUM SITE OVERALL DENSITY OF
19:37:11 18 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:37:16 THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE UNDERLYING LAND USE
19:37:19 DESIGNATION AND NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER AND THE
19:37:21 SURROUNDING PATTERN.
19:37:27 MULTIFAMILY IN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE DESIGNATION
19:37:32 WITH THE GREATER DESIRE AS LAND USE POLICY 9.6.3.
19:37:34 BASED UPON ALL OF THIS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND
19:37:38 IT CONSISTENT AND JUST IN SUMMARY I WOULD LIKE TO POINT
19:37:42 OUT UNDER YOUR CURRENT ZONING YOU CAN BUILD 5.6 UNITS.
19:37:46 AND WE ARE REQUESTING RM-18 SO WE WOULD BUILD SIX UNITS
19:37:50 AND WILL GO TO 6.1 UNITS.
19:37:56 AND THE REAL INCREASE HERE IS FROM 5.6 TO .4 UNIT.
19:37:59 WE HAVE LITTLE OVER 5.5 UNITS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY THE
19:38:00 CURRENT ZONING.
19:38:05 AND WE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE SIX UNITS INSTEAD OF THE
19:38:06 FIVE.
19:38:08 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT
19:38:10 HAVE.
19:38:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
19:38:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. MICHELINI, CAN YOU REPEAT THAT,
19:38:17 I DIDN'T QUITE GET THAT.
19:38:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: DON'T DO THAT.
19:38:22 >> WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO REPEAT, UNDER OUR CURRENT
19:38:24 ZONING IS --
19:38:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, I GOT IT.
19:38:26 I GOT IT.
19:38:29 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:38:35 >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR.
19:38:39 >> DID YOU HEAR -- EVERYTHING OKAY, SIR.
19:38:42 >>LUIS VIERA: YES AND NO, MY BAD WITH TECHNOLOGY
19:38:42 CONTINUES.
19:38:44 I HAVE BEEN HERE ALMOST AN HOUR.
19:39:26 WE ARE TRYING TO GET MY WEB CAMERA.
19:39:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THERE AT THE END OF PRESCOTT BY THE
19:39:30 AMERICAN REGION.
19:39:32 SERVE LOOKING FOR RED FISH.
19:39:35 THERE IS GOOD RED FISH OUT THERE.
19:39:39 BECAUSE I SURE DIDN'T CATCH ANY.
19:39:45 STEVE, YOU SAID THAT THIS WAS COMPLETELY CONSISTENT
19:39:48 FIVE OR SIX MULTIFAMILY UNITS WAS COMPLETELY
19:39:53 CONSISTENT, BUT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE WEST, AND
19:39:58 TO THE NORTH, ARE SINGLE FAMILY -- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES,
19:40:01 RIGHT?
19:40:03 >> RIGHT HERE ARE --
19:40:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, NO.
19:40:06 >> LET ME JUST FINISH.
19:40:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW THAT IS RIGHT THERE AND SAYS
19:40:09 PD.
19:40:10 IMMEDIATELY TO THE LEFT.
19:40:11 >> TO THE LEFT?
19:40:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LOOKS LIKE THREE SINGLE FAMILY AND
19:40:17 IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH IS ONE SINGLE FAMILY.
19:40:19 >> RIGHT HERE ARE THE APARTMENTS.
19:40:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW.
19:40:22 I TOTALLY RECOGNIZE THAT.
19:40:23 I GO OUT THERE VERY OFTEN.
19:40:26 >> NOT JUST ME SAYING IT, BUT ALSO THE PLANNING
19:40:28 COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF HAVE SAID IT IS
19:40:30 CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE.
19:40:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
19:40:34 EVERYBODY TAKES A LOOK AT THAT MAP.
19:40:36 I DON'T KNOW WHERE I AM GOING ON THIS.
19:40:40 BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE
19:40:43 ARE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING IN, YOU KNOW, MULTIFAMILY
19:40:46 UNITS, IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY UNITS.
19:40:49 I AM GOING TO ASK STAFF THIS QUESTION.
19:40:54 IS -- ON THE RM-18, SOUTH FLORIDA A HEIGHT DIFFERENCE,
19:41:04 RYAN, BETWEEN -- ZANE, BETWEEN THE RM-16 AND RM-18.
19:41:07 >>ZANE HUSAIN: LET ME LOOK AT THE CODE REAL QUICK.
19:41:19 I WILL LET YOU KNOW.
19:41:22 >> ON TWO PAGE OF THE STAFF REPORT IDENTIFIES THE
19:41:24 HEIGHT 35 FEET FOR RM-18.
19:41:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SINGLE
19:41:29 FAMILY HEIGHT AND OR THE RM-16.
19:41:33 >>ZANE HUSAIN: SORRY ABOUT THAT, SIR.
19:41:36 BOTH ARE 35 FEET IN HEIGHT.
19:41:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THROUGH BOTH OF YOU ON THAT.
19:41:42 AND THEN MY LAST POINT IS IN REGARD TO -- AND LET ME GO
19:41:48 DOWN ON THE STAFF REPORT.
19:41:51 I THINK IT IS ON THE STAFF REPORT -- NO, IT IS ON THE
19:41:53 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT.
19:41:56 WE HAVE SEEN THIS PROVISION QUITE OFTEN.
19:42:00 WITH REGARDS TO THE COASTAL HIGH HAS AROUND AREA THAT
19:42:04 THIS IS CLEARLY WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA,
19:42:12 THIS AREA HAS A LOT OF BAD FLOODING.
19:42:16 OUR OBJECTIVE WHICH WE HAVE SEEN QUITE A BIT THIS YEAR,
19:42:24 OBJECTIVE CM -- OBJECTIVE 1.1 SAYS, DIRECT FUTURE
19:42:28 CONCENTRATIONS AWAY FROM THE HIGH COASTAL HAZARD AREA
19:42:32 TO ACHIEVE A NO NET INCREASE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
19:42:36 WITHIN THE CHAA.
19:42:40 STAFF'S OPINION AND YOU CONCUR WITH MR. MICHELINI UNDER
19:42:47 THE RM-16 GET 5.6 UNITS AND UNDER THE RM-18 HE CAN GET
19:42:47 6 UNITS.
19:42:51 SO HE IS GETTING AN ADDITIONAL ONE UNIT.
19:42:55 ARE YOU CONCURRING WITH THAT, ZANE OR RYAN OR WHOEVER
19:42:58 WANTS TO ANSWER?
19:42:59 >>ZANE HUSAIN: DANNY?
19:43:02 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS SITE HAS ALREADY BEEN PLANNED.
19:43:08 THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS DEALT WITH ON THE PLAN
19:43:11 AMENDMENT STAGE OR ALREADY HAS BEEN PLANNED IN WITH THE
19:43:14 UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE.
19:43:18 THAT IS HOW WE EXCEPTED IT IN THE PAST.
19:43:22 NO NET INCREASE.
19:43:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY FIRST QUESTION, THIS -- THIS IS
19:43:28 SORT OF BACKWARDS AND LET ME REVERSE IT.
19:43:33 MY FIRST QUESTION DO YOU AGREE WITH MR. MICHELINI HE
19:43:36 HAS THE ABILITY TO BUILD 5.6 AND WHICH IS FIVE UNITS
19:43:39 AND THIS REZONING ALLOWS HIM TO BUILD SIX UNITS, THAT'S
19:43:40 CORRECT?
19:43:43 >>DANNY COLLINS: I WILL DEFER THAT TO THE CITY AS FAR
19:43:47 AS HOW MANY UNITS CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN --
19:43:50 >>ZANE HUSAIN: SORRY ABOUT THAT, DANNY.
19:43:53 THAT'S CORRECT, FIVE.
19:43:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FIVE UNITS TO THE SIX UNITS.
19:44:00 GRANTED NOT A BIG DEAL, AND HOWEVER, I WILL SAY THAT IS
19:44:03 SOMEWHAT CONTRARY TO A NO NET INCREASE BECAUSE AN
19:44:05 INCREASE OF ONE UNIT.
19:44:08 THAT'S ALL I GOT, THANKS.
19:44:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE FOR THE APPLICANT?
19:44:17 ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR REPRESENTING THIS ITEM?
19:44:20 ANYONE ON SECOND FLOOR WITH THIS ITEM?
19:44:23 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO.
19:44:26 E HAVE TWO -- WE HAVE TWO CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO
19:44:29 SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.
19:44:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:45:03 >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS JEFF LESSIE, 104 WEST
19:45:06 LANCASTER STREET, WHICH IS ONE BLOCK FROM THE PROPERTY
19:45:07 WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ON PRESCOTT.
19:45:10 JUST TO GIVE YOU BACKGROUND OF THE AREA THAT WE LIVE
19:45:12 IN.
19:45:16 IT IS WEDGED BETWEEN TWO APARTMENT -- TWO LARGE
19:45:18 APARTMENT COMPLEX TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
19:45:21 THE SOUTH ONE IS NOW GOING IN AND NOT -- PEOPLE ARE NOT
19:45:25 LIVING THERE YET, BUT THEY HAVE RAISED THE LAND AND
19:45:26 WALLED IT IN.
19:45:31 SO AROUND NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR, WE HAD -- THE END OF
19:45:35 THE HURRICANE SEASON SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF STORM SURGE
19:45:40 CAME IN BETWEEN THOSE TWO WALLED-IN APARTMENT COMPLEXES
19:45:43 AND TOOK OUT 23 OF THE HOMES IN THIS AREA.
19:45:47 THIS IS ONE OF THOSE PROPERTIES THAT IS -- THAT HAD TO
19:45:50 BE MOVED OUT AND I THINK THERE ARE STILL 15 HOMES THAT
19:45:53 ARE EMPTY BECAUSE THE RESIDENTS COULD NOT MOVE BACK IN
19:45:55 AND A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DAMAGE.
19:46:01 SO THERE IS A CONCERN ABOUT THE WATER IN THIS AREA.
19:46:04 OUR PRIMARY CONCERN IS -- IS -- IS INCREASING THE
19:46:07 NUMBER OF HOMES THAT CAN GO ON THIS PROPERTY.
19:46:11 IT IS A BIG PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THERE ARE A LOT OF
19:46:14 MULTIFAMILY HOMES IN THE AREA.
19:46:18 BUT WE ARE -- MY WIFE AND I ARE BOTH OF THE OPINION
19:46:21 THAT CONTINUING TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING
19:46:26 IN THIS AREA IS JUST GOING TO CREATE MORE PROBLEMS.
19:46:31 WE HAVE BEEN THERE FOR 14 YEARS.
19:46:34 AND THIS -- SINCE THIS NEWEST APARTMENT COMPLEX WENT
19:46:39 IN, IT HAS REALLY CHANGED THE -- THE DYNAMIC OF THE
19:46:39 AREA.
19:46:43 SO IT DOES FLOOD A LOT MORE READILY.
19:46:47 AND WE JUST THINK THIS IS CONTRIBUTING MORE TO THAT BY
19:46:51 ADDING MORE -- IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE MUCH, ONE UNIT.
19:46:54 IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE MUCH, BUT IT IS OUR OPINION THAT
19:46:58 WE ARE TRYING TO -- TO SLOW DOWN OR HALT INCREASING THE
19:47:00 -- THE BUILDING IN THIS AREA.
19:47:07 LET ME LOOK AT MY NOTES TO SEE IF I HAVE ANYTHING ELSE.
19:47:12 OH, I DID HAVE ALSO A CONCERN WHEN I FIRST CAME HERE,
19:47:16 WE HAD TALKED WITH THE -- WITH THE LANDOWNER JON LUM
19:47:19 AND UNDER THE IMPRESSION TRYING TO BUILD EIGHT UNITS ON
19:47:24 THERE THAT THEY HAD THE -- THE LAND TO BUILD SEVEN AND
19:47:27 A HALF, AND THEY WERE TRYING TO GET THE -- THE CODE
19:47:30 CHANGED SO WE CAN BUILD EIGHT.
19:47:32 IT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED TONIGHT THAT IT IS SIX.
19:47:36 I SURE HOPE -- IF THIS DOES GET APPROVED, I DON'T SEE
19:47:40 EIGHT GOING DOWN IN THERE DOWN THE ROAD AND THAT WAS
19:47:43 ANOTHER CONCERN THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO PUSH FOR EIGHT
19:47:44 UNITS ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.
19:47:47 THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME TALK.
19:47:49 AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
19:47:51 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME.
19:47:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:48:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU SAID YOU LIVE ON LANCASTER, WHO
19:48:04 WAS EFFECTED BY THAT STORM SURGE.
19:48:05 >> 23 HOMES.
19:48:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WAS YOUR HOME AFFECTED BY IT?
19:48:12 >> MY HOME IS A TOWN HOME AND BUILT OF FIRST FLOOR.
19:48:14 THE WHOLE FIRST FLOOR IS GARAGE.
19:48:18 THE WATER DID COME UP TO THE GARAGE THROUGH THE UNIT.
19:48:20 THERE ARE HOLES IN THE FRONT AND BACK OF THE
19:48:21 OPPORTUNITY ALLOW FOR THAT.
19:48:24 SO IT DID COME INTO OUR GARAGE.
19:48:26 THE HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET ON BOTH SIDES, THEY HAD
19:48:28 THREE FEET OF WATER IN THE HOUSE.
19:48:30 SO THEY HAD TO MOVE OUT.
19:48:33 AND SEVERAL BLOCKS AROUND THERE, ALMOST EVERY OF THE
19:48:38 HOMES AND DUPLEXES DID HAVE TO VACATE.
19:48:41 >> THIS STORM SURGE FROM A RAIN OR DO WE HAVE A
19:48:42 HURRICANE?
19:48:44 >> RIGHT AT THE END OF HURRICANE SEASON.
19:48:48 IT WAS A LOT OF RAIN AND HIGH TIDE AND MOSTLY -- THE
19:48:53 STORM SURGE PUSHING IN FROM -- BECAUSE ON THE -- ON THE
19:48:56 WEST SIDE IS THE -- IS THE BAY.
19:48:58 OUT THERE NEAR THE AMERICAN LEGION.
19:48:59 I MEAN IT IS ALL WATER.
19:49:02 SO THAT WATER CAME IN, FILLED UP ALL THE DRAINAGE
19:49:06 DITCHES AND EVERYTHING ELSE AND CONTINUED TO RISE.
19:49:09 THE FIRST TIME WE EVER HAD WATER IN OUR GARAGE.
19:49:15 NOT GOTTEN ANYWHERE CLOSE TO THAT AND THAT WAS A FIRST.
19:49:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU GOING TO MOVE NOW?
19:49:19 >> WE ARE NOT BECAUSE OUR LIVING SPACE IS 11 FEET
19:49:20 HIGHER.
19:49:24 I AM OKAY WITH WATER IN THE GARAGE BUT WHEN IT GETS IN
19:49:27 MY LIVING SPACE IS WHERE I WILL HAVE A PROBLEM.
19:49:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:49:30 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:49:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:49:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MICHELINI --
19:49:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HE SAID MORE FOLKS WANT TO SPEAK.
19:49:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, I WILL WAIT.
19:50:06 THANK YOU, SIR.
19:50:11 >> HELLO, MY NAME IS MIRANDA LESSIE.
19:50:17 I LIVE 5014 WEST LANCASTER STREET, TAMPA, FLORIDA,
19:50:19 33616.
19:50:21 AS YOU JUST HEARD FROM MY HUSBAND, JEFF.
19:50:24 I WILL CONTINUE KIND OF WHAT HE WAS GOING OVER, AND YOU
19:50:27 HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT FLOODING AND THE AREA WE LIVE
19:50:27 IN.
19:50:31 I DID BRING, LIKE, A LITTLE MAP.
19:50:39 THIS HAS GOT WHERE WE LIVE IN CONNECTION WITH THE
19:50:40 ACTUAL PROPERTY.
19:50:42 WE LIVE HERE AND THE PROPERTY IS HERE.
19:50:46 ARE YOU GUYS ABLE TO SEE THAT?
19:50:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOT YET.
19:50:50 >> I HAVE GOTTEN IN THE WRONG SPOT.
19:50:53 GUDES ALL RIGHT, WE CAN SEE IT.
19:50:53 >> SORRY ABOUT THAT.
19:50:58 AND THIS CAN COME UP..
19:51:00 THAT'S GOOD.
19:51:02 OUR HOUSE IS HERE AND THE PROPERTY WE ARE DISCUSSING IS
19:51:05 HERE.
19:51:12 AND THE PROPERTY THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS 5001 WEST
19:51:14 PRESCOTT.
19:51:16 THIS IS A SHOT OF IT NOW.
19:51:20 I THINK YOU GUYS SAW IT FROM THE -- STAFF HAD A PICTURE
19:51:21 OF THIS.
19:51:27 WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE IS WHAT HAPPENED INSIDE AFTER THE
19:51:31 FLOOD NOVEMBER 11, 2020.
19:51:33 AS YOU CAN SEE, ALL THE WALLS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND IT
19:51:39 LOOKS LIKE THE OWNER TRIED TO REPAIR THIS, AND THIS IS
19:51:41 PROBABLY WHY HE IS TRYING TO SELL, BECAUSE HE WAS
19:51:47 PROBABLY IN OVER HIS HEAD WITH REPAIRS, MY ASSUMPTION.
19:51:51 AND THIS IS IN FRONT OF OUR HOUSE THE NIGHT OF THE
19:51:54 FLOOD THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT.
19:51:58 THE WATER HERE WAS OVER 30 FEET, RIGHT.
19:52:01 I HOPE YOU ARE ABLE TO SEE THE CAR DRIVING IN THE
19:52:04 WATER.
19:52:08 AGAIN, HERE IS THE FIRE HYDRANT THAT I KEPT MY EYE ON
19:52:11 ALL NIGHT TRYING TO SEE HOW -- HOW HIGH IT WAS GOING TO
19:52:12 GET.
19:52:15 THAT FIRE HYDRANT IS COVERED WITH WATER AND THAT IS
19:52:18 OVER TWO FEET OF WATER.
19:52:20 THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAME OUT.
19:52:24 YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY ARE WALKING IN WATER.
19:52:27 I AM SURE SOMEBODY HAD AN EMERGENCY.
19:52:29 THEY WERE THERE TO HELP.
19:52:34 THEY DIDN'T RETURN MY CALLS TO THEM WHEN THEY WERE --
19:52:34 WHEN THEY WERE THERE.
19:52:38 I WAS ASKING IF THERE WAS A PROBLEM.
19:52:40 AND THEY WERE THERE.
19:52:43 SO ALL THE HOUSES IN THIS AREA HAVE -- THE WALLS HAD TO
19:52:45 BE REMOVED.
19:52:47 THIS GENTLEMAN HERE HAD TO MOVE OUT.
19:52:50 AND MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THIS AREA ARE FAIRLY LOW
19:52:52 INCOME.
19:52:56 SO 23 PEOPLE HAD TO MOVE OUT, FIND A NEW PLACE TO
19:53:00 LIVE, TWO WEEKS BEFORE THANKSGIVING AND A MONTH BEFORE
19:53:01 CHRISTMAS.
19:53:05 SO -- AND THIS GENTLEMAN HERE -- HE WAS IN TEARS
19:53:08 BECAUSE COULD NOT FIND A PLACE THAT HE COULD AFFORD,
19:53:10 AND THAT WOULD TAKE HIS DOG.
19:53:14 SO HE HAD TO GIVE UP HIS DOG, WHICH WAS HIS BABY.
19:53:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: 30 SECONDS.
19:53:17 >> OKAY, SORRY.
19:53:21 AND SO YOU SEE ALL OF THE -- ALL OF THE FLOODING IN THE
19:53:23 AREA.
19:53:29 AND THERE ARE STILL 15 -- 15 RESIDENCES THAT ARE NOT
19:53:32 PRESENT TO THIS DAY.
19:53:36 AND I REALLY FEEL LIKE THEY ARE OVERBUILDING IN THIS
19:53:39 AREA AND YOU CAN SEE THE WALL OF THE NEW APARTMENTS
19:53:42 THAT ARE THERE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS
19:53:44 PROPERTY THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.
19:53:46 AND IT IS WALLING IN THE LINE.
19:53:48 YOU CAN SEE WALLING IN THE WATER.
19:53:53 YOU CAN SEE THE WATER LEVEL HERE FROM THE FLOOD.
19:54:00 SO, AGAIN, ALL THESE HOMES IN THIS AREA WERE FLOODED.
19:54:08 AND I STILL AM DUMFOUNDED HOW THIS HAPPENED.
19:54:09 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
19:54:10 >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
19:54:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE ON SECOND FLOOR?
19:54:22 I HAVE QUESTION FOR STAFF, THOUGH.
19:54:26 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK
19:54:28 ON THIS ITEM.
19:54:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY REGISTERED FOR THIS ITEM?
19:54:35 >>CLERK: YES, WE DO.
19:54:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HOW MANY.
19:54:41 >>CLERK: ONE.
19:54:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE WILL HEAR THEM AND THEN ASK
19:54:46 QUESTIONS.
19:54:51 >>CLERK: RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
19:54:53 [SWEARING IN]
19:55:00 >> YES, I DO, SO HELP ME GOD.
19:55:05 MAY I ADDRESS -- HELLO?
19:55:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE ARE READY.
19:55:15 >> HI MY NAME IS JEAN STROHMEYER.
19:55:18 INTERBAY AND SOUTH OF GANDY.
19:55:21 ON THIS ITEM TALKING OF THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PLAN AND
19:55:27 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE CURRENT LAND USE.
19:55:30 IT CONCERNS ME IF IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH CURRENT LAND
19:55:33 USE THAT IS OKAY, BUT WHEN WE WANT SOMETHING COMPATIBLE
19:55:38 WITH CURRENT LAND USE, THEY SAY, NO, NOT COMPATIBLE
19:55:43 WITH PHI SURE LAND USE AND WE HAVE BEEN GOING ON THIS
19:55:47 FOR 20 MONTHS NOW ALMOST GETTING CLOSE TO TWO YEARS.
19:55:50 SO WHICH ONE ARE WE USE SOMETHING IN FUTURE OR CURRENT?
19:55:52 I WOULD JUST LIKE THAT CLARIFIED.
19:55:56 AND THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT, I HAVE ACTUALLY SAID
19:55:59 BEFORE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO START TARGETING PORT
19:56:00 TAMPA.
19:56:03 AND FROM THE BOAT TODAY, I WAS ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET A
19:56:06 BOAT VIEW OF -- HERE IS PORT TAMPA.
19:56:10 AND YOU PROBABLY CAN'T SEE IT -- THAT IS NOW.
19:56:13 THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE -- THIS IS WHAT IT IS GOING
19:56:15 TO LOOK LIKE.
19:56:16 YOU ALL JUST KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE.
19:56:17 THERE YOU GO.
19:56:19 SEE THAT.
19:56:21 THE CHANGE.
19:56:28 WE HAD WOODS BEFORE AND NOW WE WILL HAVE CARDBOARD --
19:56:31 THIS GENTLEMAN SAID IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CURRENT
19:56:32 LAND USE.
19:56:34 NOTHING THAT THEY CAN BUILD IN THIS DAY THAT WILL BE
19:56:37 COMPATIBLE WITH -- WITH PORT TAMPA.
19:56:41 PORT TAMPA IS VERY UNIQUE AND JUST NOTHING THAT THEY
19:56:46 CAN SAY IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE LAND USE THERE.
19:56:51 WE HAVE -- LET'S SEE, THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD ELEVATION
19:56:53 AT -- LIKE THE PEOPLE SPOKE BEFORE ME THEY ARE
19:56:57 ELEVATING THE PROPERTY AND IT CAUSED 24 HOMES TO BE
19:56:59 FLOODED AND THEY ARE STILL NOT BACK IN THEIR HOMES,
19:57:03 MOST OF THEM.
19:57:07 WE HAVE -- LET'S SEE -- YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS IS, THEY
19:57:11 ARE THE FIRST ONES -- GIVE AN INCH, WILL TAKE A MILE.
19:57:16 GIVEN AN INCH ON -- ON RATTLESNAKE POINT AND LOOK WHAT
19:57:16 HAPPENED.
19:57:20 IT IS DECIMATED.
19:57:25 I APPRECIATE THEM BRINGING IN AND THIS MATTER -- TOWN
19:57:32 HOMES THAT ARE SIMPLE, AND NICE OF YOU TO BRING SIX
19:57:33 INSTEAD OF FIVE.
19:57:37 IT IS NOT COMPATIBLE AND RAISE IT UP AND I DON'T KNOW
19:57:40 HOW MANY OF THESE RESIDENCES ARE GOING TO FLOOD.
19:57:43 WE HAVE -- YOU SAY ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE
19:57:44 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:57:52 IT WILL IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:57:54 IT HAS BEEN OLD AND ESTABLISHED FOR MANY, MANY
19:57:55 GENERATIONS.
19:58:00 MR. RYAN HAD SAID THAT THE PERIMETER THAT THEY LOOK AT
19:58:04 FOR THE CONSISTENCY IS, LIKE, 1320.
19:58:09 AND -- BUT IF THEY ARE LOOKING AT A 1320 PERIMETER.
19:58:12 1320, WHY DO WE ONLY GET 250 NOTIFICATION.
19:58:15 WE ARE NOT SURE ABOUT THAT.
19:58:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: FIVE SECONDS, MISS STROHMEYER.
19:58:23 >> CAN I HAVE A COUPLE OF SECONDS BECAUSE I HEARD NEW
19:58:25 STUFF THAT I DIDN'T HEAR BEFORE.
19:58:25 A BIG PROBLEM.
19:58:28 IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE CODE.
19:58:31 WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE INCREASE IN DENSITY.
19:58:35 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SUPPOSED TO BE NO INTENSE --
19:58:38 INTENSITY SOUTH OF GANDY AND THE PENINSULA.
19:58:39 IT IS JUST DANGEROUS.
19:58:44 WE CAN'T EVACUATE, YOU KNOW AND I HAVE SAID IT TIME AND
19:58:47 TIME AGAIN, WHEN WE HAVE THAT TIME, THAT WILL COME, THE
19:58:50 BLOOD OF THE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THEIR CARS IN WHATEVER
19:58:53 -- IT WILL BE ON EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM.
19:58:53 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:58:55 HAVE A GREAT DAY.
19:58:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, I SEE YOU UP IN THE
19:59:00 PODIUM.
19:59:02 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
19:59:05 CITY COUNCIL, I WANT TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION TO MISS
19:59:13 STROHMEYER, TO CITY COUNCIL, AND IN THAT E-MAIL SHE
19:59:18 REFERENCED MULTIPLE HEARING.
19:59:21 AND ONE OF THEM IS THIS CASE, AND TO ENSURE THAT THE
19:59:25 PETITIONER DID HAVE IT, I WALKED COPY OF THAT E-MAIL TO
19:59:28 THE SECOND FLOOR AND GIVEN TO MR. MICHELINI AND I WILL
19:59:31 BE PUTTING A COPY IN THE RECORD AND A GENERAL REQUEST
19:59:35 TO THE PUBLIC THAT THESE CONSTITUTE EX-PARTE
19:59:38 COMMUNICATIONS AN MUST BE DISCLOSED AND VERY DIFFICULT
19:59:43 IF YOU PUT MULTIPLE CASES IN ONE SAME E-MAIL IT IS VERY
19:59:45 DIFFICULT TO MAKE SURE IT GETS TO THE PLACE IT HAS TO
19:59:48 BE AND SKILL -- ASK THE PUBLIC GENERALLY WHEN YOU
19:59:51 COMMUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL BY E-MAIL, THAT YOU -- IF
19:59:53 YOU CAN, PUT THE ADDRESS ON THERE.
19:59:57 IF YOU CAN, PLEASE PUT THE CASE FILE NUMBER ON THERE.
20:00:00 BUT CERTAINLY MAKE EACH INDIVIDUAL COMMUNICATION
20:00:03 RELATIVE TO A HEARING A SEPARATE E-MAIL AND WOULD MAKE
20:00:05 THINGS A LOT CLEANER FOR THE RECORD AND ENSURE
20:00:07 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS.
20:00:08 SO I AM GOING TO TAKE THIS DOWN AND PUT IT INTO THE RECORD.
20:00:09 AGAIN, THIS HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO MR. MICHELINI.
20:00:10 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY.
20:00:12 I APPRECIATE IT.
20:00:13 I WANTED TO LET YOU GUYS IN THE PUBLIC KNOW, MY CAMERA IS
20:00:17 JUST NOT WORKING, SO I CAN'T VOTE.
20:00:19 I MEAN, I'M HERE.
20:00:20 SO WHAT I AM GOING TO BE DOING IS, I WILL BE HERE WATCHING
20:00:24 EVERY SINGLE HEARING IN CASE THERE'S A TIE VOTE, JUST SO
20:00:29 THAT -- I MEAN, IF MY CAMERA COMES ON, I HOPE I KNOW IT'S
20:00:34 ON.
20:00:35 BUT IT'S KIND OF SCREWY.
20:00:37 SO I'M GOING TO BE HERE.
20:00:38 BUT I WILL BE IN ACTIVELY FORMALLY PARTICIPATING BUT JUST IN
20:00:44 CASE THERE'S A TIE VOTE OR DOESN'T GET FOUR VOTES AND I HAVE
20:00:47 TO VOTE, WHATEVER IT MAY BE.
20:00:49 SO JUST FYI.
20:00:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:00:54 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
20:00:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I COULD JUST FOLLOW UP.
20:00:56 I APPRECIATE COUNCILMAN VIERA STATING THAT ON THE RECORD,
20:01:02 AND AS WELL, IT ALSO LET'S THE PUBLIC KNOW THAT HE IS
20:01:05 WATCHING AND HE IS PREPARED, PERHAPS TO BE ABLE TO VOTE AT
20:01:09 THE SECOND READING SO HE'S TAKING THE OPPORTUNITY.
20:01:12 SO I JUST WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT.
20:01:13 THANK YOU.
20:01:14 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
20:01:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:01:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
20:01:19 QUESTION TO MS. WELLS.
20:01:21 CATE, THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING.
20:01:26 CORRECT?
20:01:26 NOT A PD?
20:01:27 >>CATE WELLS: CORRECT.
20:01:30 THEY ARE REQUESTING A REZONING TO RM-18.
20:01:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
20:01:34 RM-16 TO RM-18.
20:01:35 BECAUSE MR. MICHELINI MADE A STATEMENT EARLIER IN REGARD TO
20:01:44 THAT THEY WOULD ASSURE THAT ALL RESIDENTS IN THIS NEW
20:01:49 PROJECT IF IT'S BUILT WOULD BE MADE AWARE OF EVACUATION
20:01:53 PLANS AND THAT SORT OF THING.
20:01:55 BUT THAT'S NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER OUR CODE IN A EUCLIDEAN, IS
20:02:01 IT?
20:02:02 >>CATE WELLS: CORRECT.
20:02:02 WITH THE EUCLIDEAN REZONING THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS THAT ARE
20:02:05 INCLUDED, BECAUSE THERE'S NOT A SITE PLAN.
20:02:07 THERE AREN'T CONDITIONS THAT WOULD BE ADDED TO THE SITE PLAN
20:02:10 THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE ENFORCEABLE THROUGH THE ORDINANCE
20:02:13 FOR THE REZONING.
20:02:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
20:02:17 THANK YOU.
20:02:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: LET ME KNOW IF I AM GOING ASTRAY, MRS.
20:02:23 WELLS, MARTY.
20:02:24 THIS IS FOR RYAN OR MR. HUSAIN.
20:02:27 I HAVE HEARD TESTIMONY THIS EVENING IN REFERENCE TO THE
20:02:31 FLOODING IN THAT AREA, AND IN REFERENCE TO YOU HAD FOLKS
20:02:36 THAT ARE DISPLACED, THAT ARE NOT IN THOSE HOMES OR IN THAT
20:02:41 AREA, 24, 50 HOMES.
20:02:47 HAVE WE LOOKED AT THE SAFETY CONDITIONS OF THAT AREA WHERE
20:02:48 WE ARE TALKING ABOUT REZONING?
20:02:50 BECAUSE THAT'S A -- WHEN I LOOK AT PHOTOS OF THESE BUILDINGS
20:02:55 AND I SEE A WALL AND I SEE WHERE RAIN HAS COME UP TO THAT
20:02:59 WALL.
20:02:59 SO I HAVE GOT SOME CONCERNS ABOUT SAFETY ISSUES THERE.
20:03:02 SO HAVE WE GONE OUT AND ASSESSED THAT AREA THAT IT MIGHT NOT
20:03:10 BE A STRIP OF LAND ANYMORE FOR RESIDENTS?
20:03:14 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND WHETHER MRS.
20:03:17 WELLS OR ZAIN IS GOING TO ANSWER THAT.
20:03:23 IT'S A FAIR QUESTION, GRANTED.
20:03:25 BUT WHETHER IT'S AN APPROPRIATE QUESTION DURING THIS HEARING
20:03:27 FOR THE PURPOSES OF YOUR DETERMINATION, I AM GOING TO DEFER
20:03:31 TO MRS. WELLS ON THAT.
20:03:32 >>CATE WELLS: I THINK MR. MICHELINI WOULD WANT TO RESPOND
20:03:39 TO THAT LINE OF TESTIMONY IN REBUTTAL.
20:03:43 I KNOW THAT -- I BELIEVE ONE OF THE SPEAKERS INDICATED THAT
20:03:50 THIS HOME IS ELEVATED AND THE WATER INTRUSION, STORMWATER
20:03:54 INTRUSION, IN THE GARAGE, SO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS TO
20:03:58 COMPLY WITH THE UPDATED FEMA MAPS AND HOMES ARE ELEVATED TO
20:04:01 ADDRESS THAT.
20:04:04 IF THERE ARE OTHER HOMES THAT WERE BUILT AT A LOWER
20:04:07 ELEVATION, IT'S A SEPARATE ISSUE, NOT NECESSARILY RELEVANT,
20:04:13 IN MY OPINION, TO THIS REZONING.
20:04:17 BUT I THINK MR. MICHELINI WOULD WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT IN
20:04:21 REBUTTAL.
20:04:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I GO BACK TO MR.
20:04:32 MICHELINI?
20:04:35 YOU ARE UP.
20:04:35 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YOU ARE LOOKING AT OFF-SITE CONDITIONS
20:04:38 WHICH WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER.
20:04:40 AND YOU ARE ALSO LOOKING AT STRUCTURES THAT WERE BUILT PRIOR
20:04:43 TO THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW FEMA CODES.
20:04:46 SO IF YOU HAVE A SINGLE-STORY HOME THAT'S BUILT AT GRADE,
20:04:52 AND IT DOESN'T MEET THOSE ELEVATION REQUIREMENTS, YOU
20:04:55 OBVIOUSLY ARE GOING TO HAVE SOME FLOODING.
20:04:57 BUT WHAT WE ARE BEFORE YOU SAYING TO YOU, WE HAVE TO MEET
20:05:01 THE CODE, WE HAVE TO MEET FEMA REGULATIONS, EVEN THE
20:05:07 PREVIOUS INDIVIDUALS THAT TESTIFIED SAID THEY HAD AN
20:05:10 ELEVATED TOWNHOUSE, AND THAT THERE'S APPARENTLY THE CODE AND
20:05:13 THE ELEVATION WORKED THE WAY IT WAS SUPPOSED TO, BECAUSE THE
20:05:16 WATER CAME THROUGH ON THE LOWER LEVEL, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED
20:05:19 TO OBSTRUCT THE FLOW OF THAT WATER, AND THEIR LIVING AREA
20:05:24 WAS NOT IMPACTED WHATSOEVER.
20:05:26 AND I AM GUESSING BASED ON THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT THEY SHOWED
20:05:29 THAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT AT-GRADE STRUCTURES THAT WILL
20:05:33 CONTINUES TO BE AFFECTED WHETHER THEY ARE IN THIS AREA OR
20:05:36 ANY OTHER AREA OF THE CITY.
20:05:38 WHEN YOU COME BACK IN FOR PERMITTING, YOU HAVE TO MEET THE
20:05:41 FLOOD ZONE ELEVATIONS, AND YOU CAN'T OBSTRUCT THE FLOW OF
20:05:46 WATER.
20:05:47 SO THE LIVING AREAS ARE PROTECTED AND THE LOWER LEVELS, LIKE
20:05:50 THE GARAGES, THAT'S WHY YOU CAN'T HAVE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
20:05:53 IN THE LOWER LEVEL.
20:05:55 THEY HAVE TO MEET THAT ELEVATION REQUIREMENT FOR SAFETY.
20:05:58 SO WITH RESPECT TO SAFETY, THESE NEW STRUCTURES WILL BE MORE
20:06:03 SAFE THAN ANYTHING THAT EXISTS THAT WAS BUILT PRIOR TO THE
20:06:07 ADOPTION OF THE NEW CODES.
20:06:10 WE ARE REQUESTING A EUCLIDEAN REZONING FROM RM-16 TO 18, SO
20:06:16 WE CANNOT PUT THOSE KIND OF RESTRICTIONS OR WAIVERS IN HERE.
20:06:20 AND IF YOU LOOK ON PAGE 5 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT,
20:06:23 THEY SPECIFICALLY ASKED THAT THE APPLICANT ENSURE THAT THERE
20:06:26 WILL BE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON HURRICANES EVACUATION TIMES,
20:06:32 SHELTER DEMANDS FOR THE RESIDENTS PROPOSING THIS
20:06:36 DEVELOPMENT.
20:06:36 THAT'S THE REASON I ADDRESSED THAT.
20:06:38 AND I MENTIONED IT, WAS TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
20:06:41 STATEMENT ON, AS I SAID, ON PAGE 5.
20:06:44 IT'S IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH.
20:06:49 WITH RESPECT TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER
20:06:52 THIS PROPOSAL, AGAIN I WILL REFER YOU BACK TO THE PLANNING
20:06:56 COMMISSION REPORT OF WHERE WE ARE REQUESTING SIX RESIDENTIAL
20:07:02 UNITS.
20:07:04 I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAP AGAIN REGARDING THIS.
20:07:09 YOU HAVE TO ROUND DOWN WHEN IT'S RM-16, IT'S 5.6 UNITS.
20:07:15 YOU CAN'T GET FIVE AND A HALF OR 5.6 UNITS.
20:07:20 THE ONLY WAY YOU GET SIX UNITS IS TO GO INTO RM-18 WHICH IS
20:07:24 6.1, NOT 7.
20:07:25 YOU CAN'T ROUND IT UP.
20:07:27 SO YOU GET 6 UNITS.
20:07:33 THERE'S NO NET INCREASE AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION POINTED
20:07:36 OUT.
20:07:36 THEY CONSIDER IT TO BE A NO NET INCREASE ALLOWED THERE
20:07:42 CURRENTLY.
20:07:42 THE PRE- AND THE POST CONDITION, EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE
20:07:46 IMPROVED BY ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT GOES IN THERE.
20:07:51 BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THESE NEW REGULATIONS.
20:07:54 AND THE CURRENT STRUCTURE, WHETHER IT WAS FLOODED OR NOT
20:07:59 FLOODED OR WHATEVER THE JUSTIFICATION WAS FOR THE SELLER, I
20:08:05 DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT WAS, BUT THE NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS TO
20:08:08 MEET THOSE CODES.
20:08:13 THE STORMWATER ISSUES HAVE TO BE MET.
20:08:15 THE PLANNING COMMISSION TOLD YOU THAT THE FUTURE LAND USE
20:08:18 AND THE PLANNING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WE ARE CONSISTENT
20:08:22 WITH ALL OF THAT.
20:08:25 AND THE CITY STAFF HAS TOLD YOU THAT THEY REVIEWED IT.
20:08:27 I WILL BE HAPPY TO PUT THE REVIEW SHEET BACK UP SO YOU CAN
20:08:32 SEE THAT THEY FOUND CONSISTENTLY THROUGHOUT EVERY REVIEW.
20:08:37 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, PLANNING COMMISSION, NATURAL
20:08:39 RESOURCES, SOLID WASTE, TRANSPORTATION, STORMWATER,
20:08:41 WASTEWATER, WATER, TAMPA FIRE, ALL FOUND IT TO BE
20:08:45 CONSISTENT.
20:08:47 NOW, WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH PERMITTING.
20:08:50 IF THIS PROJECT IS APPROVED.
20:08:51 AND WE HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THOSE CODES.
20:08:53 AND I KNOW THIS IS MAYBE A LITTLE REDUNDANT, BUT AS I SHOWED
20:08:58 YOU, ALL OF THE BROWN AREA IS RESIDENTIAL 20.
20:09:01 THIS IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DISTRICT.
20:09:04 IT'S NOT RESIDENTIAL 10.
20:09:06 WE ARE NOT OVERBUILDING THE AREA.
20:09:09 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REFERS BACK, THAT THE
20:09:15 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT IS FAR IN EXCESS OF WHAT WE ARE
20:09:22 REQUESTING WITH RM-18.
20:09:24 I THINK THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SAID IT WAS 19 POINT -- I
20:09:36 DON'T SEE IT RIGHT NOW, BUT I RECALL THAT IT SAID EXISTING
20:09:40 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WAS OVER 19 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:09:45 SO WE ARE ASKING FOR SOMETHING THAT'S LESS THAN WHAT'S
20:09:48 ALLOWED BY THE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:09:50 WE ARE ASKING FOR SOMETHING THAT IS COMPATIBLE, AND AS I
20:09:53 SAID, CITY STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE FOUND THIS
20:09:55 PROPOSAL TO BE CONSISTENT.
20:09:57 THEY FOUND IT TO BE COMPATIBLE.
20:09:59 THERE'S NO NET INCREASE AND THERE'S NO NEGATIVE IMPACT AS
20:10:02 ASSIGNED BY YOUR PROFESSIONAL --
20:10:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S FIVE MINUTES.
20:10:09 >>STEVE MICHELINI: AND I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY TESTIMONY
20:10:11 REGARDING THIS PROJECT THAT WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL AND
20:10:13 COMPETENT EVIDENCE THAT WOULD REFUTE ANYTHING THAT THE CITY
20:10:15 STAFF PUT ON THE RECORD OR THAT I PUT ON THE RECORD.
20:10:18 THANK YOU.
20:10:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
20:10:19 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZE, SIR.
20:10:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
20:10:23 AND THIS MIGHT REQUIRE MR. MICHELINI TO COME BACK FOR A
20:10:28 SECOND REBUTTAL AGAIN AND I APOLOGIZE BUT I AM BASING MY
20:10:31 QUESTION ON SOMETHING HE SAID SEVERAL TIMES JUST NOW.
20:10:34 IS MR. MANASSE STILL WITH US THIS EVENING?
20:10:37 >>RYAN MANASSE: I AM, SIR.
20:10:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, RYAN, GOING BACK TO OUR OBJECTIVE,
20:10:46 COMPREHENSIVE OBJECTIVE CM 1.1 AND SAYS DIRECT AWAY FROM THE
20:10:53 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, CHHA, TO ACHIEVE A NO-NET INCREASE
20:10:58 IN OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN THE CHHA.
20:11:01 THIS PARTICULAR REZONING, BASED UPON TESTIMONY I HAVE HEARD
20:11:06 TONIGHT, TAKES THE OPPORTUNITY FROM THE CURRENT FIVE UNITS
20:11:10 TO SIX UNITS.
20:11:13 ISN'T THAT A NET INCREASE IN THE DENSITY ALLOWED FOR THIS
20:11:18 PARCEL BASED UPON THE REZONING?
20:11:20 >>RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
20:11:24 WITH RESPECT TO YOUR QUESTION, I BELIEVE IT'S MORE BETTER
20:11:27 ANSWERED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION BECAUSE YOU ARE CITING
20:11:29 POLICY FROM THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:11:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT THEN I
20:11:34 ASKED THAT QUESTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BEFORE, AND
20:11:36 HE PUNTED IT OVER TO YOU GUYS AND SAID YOU HAVE TO CALCULATE
20:11:40 THE NUMBER OF UNITS.
20:11:41 OKAY.
20:11:42 I GUESS WHAT I AM SAYING IS, ISN'T 6 ONE MORE UNIT THAN 5?
20:11:48 >>RYAN MANASSE: TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, YES, SIR.
20:11:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THAT SOUNDED TO ME LIKE A NET GAIN.
20:11:56 LET ME FINISH.
20:11:57 LET ME FINISH, CATE.
20:11:59 BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT GOING TO NEED TO TALK WHEN I GET DONE.
20:12:03 I THINK THIS IS SO CLOSE, IT'S .4 UNITS OFF, THAT IT DOESN'T
20:12:08 DISTURB ME GREATLY, OKAY.
20:12:10 BASED ON ALL THE TESTIMONY, I AM GOING TO SUPPORT THIS, BUT
20:12:13 I DON'T LIKE THE PRECEDENT OF US GOING ON THE RECORD AND NOT
20:12:18 WORRYING ABOUT WHAT NO NET INCREASE REALLY MEANS.
20:12:22 OKAY?
20:12:26 SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T HAVE HEARTBURN BECAUSE WE ARE GOING
20:12:28 FROM FIVE UNITS TO SIX UNITS, I DON'T THINK IT'S A BIG DEAL
20:12:32 ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
20:12:33 I JUST THINK WE NEED TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT WHAT SORT OF
20:12:36 PRECEDENT WE LAY WHEN WE DON'T FOCUS ON SOME OF THESE
20:12:42 ISSUES.
20:12:43 OKAY.
20:12:43 THAT'S ALL.
20:12:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:12:46 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU.
20:12:47 THE LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO NO NET INCREASE IS IN THE
20:12:51 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND I BELIEVE THAT PLANNERS WITH THE
20:12:54 PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE STATED TO COUNCIL THAT THEY LOOK AT
20:12:58 THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AS THE MAXIMUM
20:13:01 ALLOWED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
20:13:04 ANYTHING ABOVE WHAT IS OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY THE UNDERLYING
20:13:08 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WOULD THEN BE A NO NET INCREASE
20:13:12 IF YOU WENT ABOVE IT. IN THIS CASE IT'S A RESIDENTIAL 20
20:13:15 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION THAT THEY WOULD LOOK AT THE
20:13:19 MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED BY THAT, AND THEN DETERMINE IF THERE
20:13:23 IS A NET INCREASE IN DENSITY.
20:13:26 AND I THINK IN THE STAFF REPORT FROM THE PLANNING
20:13:28 COMMISSION, AND MR. COLLINS DIDN'T REALLY GET INTO THAT, BUT
20:13:34 IN THE STAFF REPORT IT IDENTIFIED THE EXISTING DENSITY, THE
20:13:38 PROPOSED DENSITY WITH THIS REZONING, AND THEN CONFIRMED THAT
20:13:42 EVEN WITH THE CHANGE IN THE REZONING, THE DENSITY IS STILL
20:13:47 BELOW THAT ALLOWED BY THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE
20:13:50 DESIGNATION.
20:13:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IT'S MARTIN SHELBY.
20:13:55 I SEE MR. COLLINS ONLINE.
20:13:57 AND IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR HIM TO SPEAK FOR THE RECORD.
20:14:02 >>DANNY COLLINS: JUST TO CLARIFY, AND UNDER THAT
20:14:10 RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION, FOR MAXIMUM SIX DWELLING UNITS
20:14:17 UNDER THAT DESIGNATION.
20:14:18 SO THIS WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A NET INCREASE.
20:14:23 NOW, IF THERE WERE PLAN AMENDMENTS -- DENSITY, AND THAT WAS
20:14:30 TO BE CONSIDERED, WAS PLANNING COMMISSION COULD HAVE A NET
20:14:36 INCREASE WITH THE UNDERLYING LAND USE.
20:14:41 [~AUDIO CUTS OUT~] AND THAT'S UNDER THAT CATEGORY.
20:14:44 THANK YOU.
20:14:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYTHING ELSE?
20:14:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, THANK YOU.
20:14:52 I'M GOOD.
20:14:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:14:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE MR. MICHELINI
20:14:59 THE LAST WORD BEFORE YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
20:15:03 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU.
20:15:04 I THINK THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THE FACT THAT THIS IS A
20:15:07 COMPATIBLE REQUEST, AND IT DOES MEET THE CRITERIA FOR
20:15:12 CONSIDERATION TO GO TO RM-16 TO RM-18, AND WE RESPECTFULLY
20:15:18 REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:15:19 I THINK THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED WITH COMPETENT AND
20:15:22 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON BOTH THE STAFF SIDE AND IN THE
20:15:25 PRESENTATION TO WARRANT APPROVAL.
20:15:29 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:15:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
20:15:32 >> SECOND.
20:15:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED TO CLOSE, SECOND BY
20:15:36 MR. CITRO.
20:15:37 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:15:38 ANY OPPOSED?
20:15:39 MR. DINGFELDER, I BELIEVE.
20:15:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'LL PASS, THANK YOU.
20:15:44 I WILL DO THE NEXT ONE.
20:15:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE ONLY ONE LEFT.
20:15:51 ITEM NUMBER 5, FILE REZ 21-26.
20:15:58 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
20:16:00 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
20:16:03 5001 WEST PRESCOTT STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
20:16:07 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
20:16:09 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
20:16:13 RM-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:16:18 >> SECOND.
20:16:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF
20:16:22 PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE
20:16:25 REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY
20:16:28 CODE WITH EUCLIDEAN ZONING.
20:16:32 THE FACTS ARE, THE REPORT REPORTS COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOALS,
20:16:38 OBJECTIVES AND POLICY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS NOTED IN
20:16:41 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AS CONSISTENT WITH LAND
20:16:44 USE OBJECTIVE 9.2 WHICH IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS
20:16:48 AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES
20:16:53 FOR THE PROJECTED POPULATION.
20:16:55 MULTIFAMILY IS ENCOURAGED IN THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE
20:16:57 CATEGORY PROVIDING A HIGHER DENSITY WHERE GREATER
20:17:03 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS DESIRED, LAND USE POLICY 9.6.3.
20:17:07 THE APPLICANT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND POLICY 2.1.2 AND
20:17:12 HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT
20:17:17 LAND AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND.
20:17:23 AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWN PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES
20:17:27 DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER,
20:17:30 COMPATIBILITY.
20:17:32 THE PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFECTIVE SUBSTANTIAL USE OF
20:17:37 LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
20:17:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA MOVED IT.
20:17:46 MR. CITRO SECONDS IT.
20:17:48 ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
20:17:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO.
20:17:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:17:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:17:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:17:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HESITANTLY, YES.
20:18:01 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:18:02 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH GUDES VOTING NO, VIERA
20:18:05 BEING ABSENT.
20:18:06 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT
20:18:09 9:30 A.M.
20:18:10 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCIL.
20:18:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 6.
20:18:16 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:18:18 ITEM NUMBER 6 IS FILE REZ 21-334.
20:18:21 THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 106 WEST HAMILTON
20:18:25 AVENUE.
20:18:25 IT IS REQUESTED TO REZONE FROM S SH-RS, SH-CG TO SH-PD
20:18:32 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
20:18:35 I WILL DEFER TO THE PLAN WILLING COMMISSION FOR THEIR
20:18:37 REPORT.
20:18:37 IF YOU WOULD PLEASE RETURN TO ME AFTER.
20:18:39 >> THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:18:46 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:18:47 THE NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL IF PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE
20:18:50 SPECIFICALLY SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
20:18:52 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS AMERICAN LEGION AN
20:18:56 PARK IS WITHIN A HALF MILE TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE
20:18:58 ON NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
20:18:59 THE CLOSEST BUS STOP IS APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF THE
20:19:03 SUBJECT SITE ON NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
20:19:05 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE IS RECOGNIZED TRANSIT EMPHASIS
20:19:10 CORRIDOR, AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:19:13 THE SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
20:19:16 THERE'S AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
20:19:19 SURROUNDING PROPERTY.
20:19:21 YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IN A PURPLE COLOR,
20:19:25 PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USE ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE,
20:19:29 WEST ALONG HAMILTON AVENUE.
20:19:31 THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES.
20:19:35 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:19:37 THE SUBJECT SITE IS PRESENTLY UNDER RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE
20:19:43 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:19:46 THERE IS CC-35 DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND
20:19:50 RESIDENTIAL -- NORTH, WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:19:55 BASED ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED, ON APRIL 22ND, ON APRIL
20:20:02 22ND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FOUR STRUCTURES FOR A
20:20:05 TOTAL OF 9,592 SQUARE FEET.
20:20:12 BEING THAT THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A COMMUNITY, THE
20:20:15 APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A 20% NODE BONUS BASED ON ENHANCED
20:20:20 LAND, IN FRONT OF A CHURCH.
20:20:22 PARKING AREA -- PER PEDESTRIAN.
20:20:26 CITY OF TAMPA STAFF EVALUATED THE REQUEST FOR THE NODE ZONE
20:20:29 AND DETERMINED THAT THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THE
20:20:32 REQUIREMENT FOR THE CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
20:20:36 THEREFORE SINCE THE REQUEST IS F.A.R. THE PLANNED
20:20:39 DEVELOPMENT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY OF THE FUTURE
20:20:43 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:20:44 AS DESCRIBED IN LAND USE POLICY 8.14.1, DEVELOPMENT SHALL
20:20:48 NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY AND -- ON LAND USE PLANNED
20:20:52 CATEGORIES, WHILE APPLICANT PLANS TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE
20:20:56 PROPOSED F.A.R. BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE SITE
20:20:58 PLAN DENSITY THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED A RESIDENTIAL 10 AND IS
20:21:02 INCONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY 1.14.1.
20:21:07 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
20:21:10 FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
20:21:12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:21:13 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
20:21:15 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:21:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
20:21:17 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:21:19 THE CLERK NEEDS A BREAK.
20:21:20 A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS, PLEASE.
20:21:23 WE WILL PICK IT UP.
20:21:27 (CITY COUNCIL RECESS)
20:21:36 [ ROLL CALL IN PROGRESS ]
20:29:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
20:29:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
20:29:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
20:29:26 >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT.
20:29:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
20:29:30 WE PICK UP WITH ITEM NUMBER 6 WITH THE CITY PORTION.
20:29:33 MR. MANASSE.
20:29:34 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:29:36 AGAIN ITEM NUMBER 6 IS FILE REZ 21-33, AND THE APPLICANT IS
20:29:41 PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 106 -- SORRY, LET ME
20:29:46 SHARE MY SCREEN -- WEST HAMILTON AVENUE FROM SEMINOLE
20:29:49 HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SH-RS, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
20:29:53 COMMERCIAL GENERAL SH-CG AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PLANNED
20:29:56 DEVELOPMENT SH-PD TO SH-PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR
20:30:01 THAT PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
20:30:03 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SIX WAIVERS, AND WHAT I WANT TO
20:30:07 DO IS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT YOU HAVE FIVE WAIVERS LISTED AND
20:30:10 I AM GOING TO LIST THE SIX ONE HERE VERBALLY AND THEN I WILL
20:30:13 EXPLAIN IT FURTHER IN MY PRESENTATION.
20:30:15 THE ADDITION THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:30:17 READING IN ADDITION TO THOSE FIVE WAIVERS IS SECTION
20:30:20 27-283.7 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM 29 TO 27
20:30:25 SPACES.
20:30:26 AND I WILL GET THAT OUT IN A SECOND.
20:30:29 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE LOT WEST OF WEST HAMILTON AVENUE
20:30:32 AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE INTERSECTION AND CONTAINS 226,897
20:30:37 SQUARE FEET OR .25 ACRES, DETACHED SINGLE RESIDENCE TO THE
20:30:42 NORTH AND WEST IN SH-RS SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT AND STORAGE
20:30:48 TO THE WEST AND SOUTH WHICH IS FILE REZ 17-75 ZONING
20:30:54 DISTRICT.
20:30:55 THE SITE DOES CONTAIN AN EXISTING PLACE OF RELIGIOUS
20:30:58 ASSEMBLY, AND PART OF THAT ON THE SITE PLAN I AM SHOWN ON
20:31:01 SCREEN IS GOING TO BE RETAINED AND THAT'S THAT NORTHERN
20:31:04 SECTION SHOWN HERE ON MY CURSOR.
20:31:05 THE NEW PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ARE RETAINING OR RELOCATING
20:31:09 THESE TWO 864 SQUARE FEET CLASSROOMS, AND THEN THE NEW
20:31:15 PROPOSED CHURCH OR PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY BUILDING
20:31:17 HERE.
20:31:18 AND THAT'S TO THAT SOUTHEAST CORNER.
20:31:22 SURFACE PARKING IS LOCATED TO THE EAST.
20:31:25 AND AGAIN, TO REITERATE, THE REDUCTION IN PARKING IS DUE TO
20:31:31 A NATURAL RESOURCES COMMENT THAT STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING WITH
20:31:35 THE APPLICANTS TO TRY TO MITIGATE TO SAVE THESE TREES, AND
20:31:39 IN ORDER TO DO THAT WE NEED TO LOSE A COUPLE OF PARKING
20:31:41 SPACES.
20:31:42 SO GOING BACK OVER, SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WERE MENTIONED IN
20:31:46 THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT WE TALKED ABOUT THE NODE
20:31:49 BONUS, AND TO ELABORATE ON THAT, THIS PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY
20:31:52 EXCEEDING THAT F.A.R., THAT IS .35 WHICH IS ALLOWED IN R-10
20:31:58 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, AND AS DANNY DID STATE THE CITY
20:32:02 HAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT BONUS NOTICE IS
20:32:04 ACCEPTABLE. IN THIS CASE IT WAS NOT BECAUSE THE EXISTING
20:32:06 BUILDING AND THE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED FOR THE BONUS NODE
20:32:11 INCREASED CITY STAFF WASN'T GOOD WITH.
20:32:15 FURTHER, TALKS WITH THE APPLICANT, THEY WERE ABLE TO REDUCE
20:32:21 THE SOUTHEAST BUILDING TO COME UNDER THE F.A.R. THAT IS
20:32:28 THEIR MAXIMUM, WHICH IS .35.
20:32:31 SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, THE SETBACKS WOULD RELATIVELY
20:32:37 REMAIN THE SAME FOR THE SETBACK TO THE EAST ZERO, WEST 65,
20:32:41 NORTH 10 FEET, SOUTH 15 FEET, AND THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
20:32:44 HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 35 FEET.
20:32:49 THE MODIFICATION TO THE REDUCTION AND INTENSITY WOULD BE
20:32:52 REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND STAFF DID
20:32:55 FIND THIS SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED BEFORE YOU RIGHT NOW
20:32:58 INCONSISTENT BASED ON EXCEEDING THE F.A.R.
20:33:02 BUT IT HAS BEEN AGREED WERE THE APPLICANT, WHICH I'M
20:33:05 ASSUMING WILL ATTEST TO THIS, BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:33:09 READING REDUCE THAT F.A.R. AND THAT WAY STAFF WOULD FIND THE
20:33:12 REQUEST CONSISTENT.
20:33:13 AGAIN THAT ADDITIONAL WAIVER IS DUE TO MITIGATING AND TRYING
20:33:15 TO SAVE THIS TREE OVER HERE TO THE SOUTH.
20:33:20 THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ON SCREEN SHOW THIS IS ALSO THE SITE
20:33:25 DATA INFORMATION, AND OVER TO THE RIGHT THAT'S BASICALLY
20:33:27 WHERE I AM TALKING ABOUT, THEY HAVE TO DECREASE THEIR
20:33:29 F.A.R., THEIR INTENSITY, THEIR TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR THE NEW
20:33:33 DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THIS PROJECT.
20:33:37 THE TOP IS THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS, NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND
20:33:41 WEST AND THE BOTTOM IS THE EXISTING CHURCH THAT'S GOING TO
20:33:44 BE REMAINING.
20:33:46 OR PARTS OF IT.
20:33:47 DANNY DID SHOW YOU A LOCATION MAP, AND THERE WERE NO
20:33:51 HISTORIC LANDMARKS WITHIN A THOUSAND FOOT BUFFER AND THAT'S
20:33:54 GREEN DASHED LINE.
20:33:55 AS YOU CAN SEE THIS IS JUST WEST OF FLORIDA AND THIS LARGE
20:33:59 WHITE BLOCK HERE, THE SH-PD, THIS IS L SHAPED LOT, THAT IS
20:34:03 AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE, AND THEN THE CHURCH ITSELF IS OR
20:34:07 PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IS THE RED DASHED LINE.
20:34:10 TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THAT
20:34:13 SH-RS ALSO TO THE EAST AND THEN PART GOING TO THE SOUTH AND
20:34:18 THEN THAT PD KIND OF GOES SOUTH.
20:34:20 YOU CAN SEE TO THE NORTH SH-CI SO YOU HAVE THAT COMMERCIAL
20:34:24 INTENSIVE USES ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE.
20:34:27 PICTURES OF THE SITE.
20:34:30 SO THE EXISTING CHURCH.
20:34:31 TO THE LEFT HERE IS THAT PD TO THE EAST.
20:34:34 AND THESE ARE JUST PICTURES TO THE RIGHT SHOW A COUPLE OF
20:34:36 THOSE RELOCATED 864 SQUARE FEET UNITS ON THE LOCATION OF.
20:34:44 AND THEN TO THE NORTH, AND THE AERIAL GIVES A BETTER PICTURE
20:34:47 BUT THIS IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE
20:34:49 NORTH, AND THEN TO THE WEST, AND THEN THE COMMERCIAL
20:34:52 INTENSIVE USES TO THE RIGHT OF THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT.
20:34:55 AND THEN THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS AIR CONDITIONED
20:34:58 STORAGE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
20:35:01 AGAIN, CITY STAFF DID FIND IT INCONSISTENT, BUT IF THE
20:35:05 MODIFICATIONS ARE AGREED UPON, WHICH THE APPLICANT HAS
20:35:08 AGREED TO DO BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READ BEING, STAFF
20:35:11 WOULD FIND THIS CONSISTENT, AND I BELIEVE THAT WOULD TAKE
20:35:14 CARE OF THE INCONSISTENCY BASIS FROM DANNY COLLINS, THE
20:35:18 PLANNING COMMISSION OF EXCEEDING THEIR F.A.R. AS WELL.
20:35:21 WITH THAT BEING SAID, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS
20:35:23 YOU MAY HAVE.
20:35:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
20:35:26 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:35:28 APPLICANT?
20:35:29 >> GOOD EVENING.
20:35:33 MY NAME IS CHEIKH SYLLA, I AM AN ARCHITECT AND URBAN
20:35:39 PLANNER.
20:35:40 IN THE INTEREST OF TIME AND EFFICIENCY, I AM GOING TO TRY TO
20:35:43 FORGO REPEATING WHAT STAFF HAS SAID, BECAUSE WE CONCUR.
20:35:49 I CONCUR WITH EVERYTHING THAT THEY HAVE INDICATED.
20:35:52 I THINK THE ONLY POINT THAT I WANT TO MAKE IS THE FACT THAT
20:35:57 THIS PROPERTY HAS A SPLIT ZONING, WHAT'S CALLED OFTEN SPLIT
20:36:02 ZONING, AND IT'S NOT JUST TWO ZONING DESIGNATIONS.
20:36:06 IT REALLY HAS THREE ZONING DESIGNATIONS.
20:36:09 AND, THEREFORE, THE PD WOULD BASICALLY PROVIDE A BASIS FOR
20:36:14 UNIFYING THE ZONING.
20:36:17 BUT STAFF HAS DONE A GOOD JOB IN DESCRIBING THE PROJECT.
20:36:24 AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY COMMENT OR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:36:28 THANK YOU.
20:36:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
20:36:30 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:36:32 ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
20:36:43 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
20:36:50 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.
20:36:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
20:36:54 >> MY NAME IS LORI SMART, 7211 NORTH DUNCAN AND I AM
20:37:34 DIRECTLY BEHIND THE STORAGE UNIT AREA.
20:37:38 MY CONCERN IS WHERE ARE THESE RELOCATED UNITS GOING TO MOVE
20:37:46 TO?
20:37:50 AND THIS PARKING AREA THAT YOU SHOW ALL OF THESE PARKING
20:37:52 SPOTS NOW LOOKS TO BE DIRECTLY BEHIND MY PROPERTY AND MY
20:37:56 NEIGHBOR DIRECTLY NEXT TO ME.
20:38:00 SO THE CONCERN THERE IS THAT PROPERTY HAVING ALL OF THE
20:38:05 PARKING SPOTS AT NIGHTTIME WOULD BE GATED, UNGATED ACCESS TO
20:38:11 ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO COME, AND WHAT TYPE OF LIGHTING IS
20:38:14 GOING TO BE THERE, AND WHERE ARE THESE UNITS GOING TO GO?
20:38:20 IT'S BEEN SEEN WHAT'S PUT OUT WHEN THE STORAGE UNIT, AIR
20:38:25 CONDITIONED UNIT, IS NOT VERY HIGH, SO YOU DO SEE OVER THE
20:38:29 FENCING IN THAT AREA.
20:38:33 YOU CAN'T REALLY TELL HERE ON THIS DOCUMENT WHERE OUR
20:38:36 PROPERTY IS.
20:38:37 BUT BASED ON THE PICTURES THAT WERE SHOWN, I'M DIRECTLY
20:38:41 BEHIND 7211, DUNCAN IS BEHIND THE AREA, SO THE CITY
20:38:49 STATEMENT THAT WAS SPOKEN IS THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE
20:38:53 RELOCATED.
20:38:54 IT DOESN'T SAY WHERE.
20:38:56 AND THEN THE PROPERTY IN THE FRONT IS AN OLDER BUILDING.
20:39:01 THEY ARE JUST GOING TO LEAVE IT THERE.
20:39:04 NO RESTORATION WITH THE NEW BUILDING BEHIND.
20:39:08 YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T REALLY LOOK LIKE A VERY GOOD PROPERTY
20:39:12 TO BE HONEST.
20:39:14 SO THOSE ARE MY CONCERNS.
20:39:16 ANY QUESTIONS, I'M WELCOME TO ANSWER.
20:39:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MA'AM.
20:39:36 WE'LL ASK DID APPLICANT TO ANSWER.
20:39:38 >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
20:39:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ELSE ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
20:39:56 ANYBODY ELSE ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
20:40:07 >>ROSE PETRUCHA: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
20:40:09 THERE IS NO ONE ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER.
20:40:11 >>THE CLERK: THERE'S NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM
20:40:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:40:30 LET ME ASK CITY STAFF.
20:40:32 RYAN, DID YOU HEAR THE QUESTIONS THE LADY ASKED?
20:40:38 >>RYAN MANASSE: I DID, SIR.
20:40:39 THANK YOU.
20:40:39 I SHOULD BE SHARING MY SCREEN.
20:40:42 DO YOU GUYS SEE THE SITE PLAN?
20:40:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE SEE IT.
20:40:47 >>RYAN MANASSE: AND I BELIEVE IF THE AGENT WANTS TO JUMP
20:40:49 ON, TOO, BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO TAKE HIS PRESENTATION FROM
20:40:52 HIM.
20:40:52 BUT JUST TO SHOW THERE IS A NEW PORTE-COCHERE BEING AT THE
20:40:57 NEW CHURCH.
20:40:58 THESE RELOCATED CLASSROOMS, TO ANSWER THE NEIGHBOR'S
20:41:03 QUESTION, THIS WOULD BE THE LOCATION OF THOSE CLASSROOMS.
20:41:05 THE STRUCTURES THAT HAVE TO MEET THE SETBACKS ARE LISTED IN
20:41:08 THE STAFF REPORT AS PER THE SITE PLAN.
20:41:10 AS YOU CAN SEE, THE IMMEDIATE SOUTH WHICH WOULD BE THE
20:41:12 BUFFER REQUIREMENT IS STILL AT SH-PD, IT'S THE NEIGHBORS TO
20:41:17 THE WEST, THEY ARE REQUESTING THAT A BUFFER REDUCTION FROM
20:41:20 10 FEET TO 2.8 ON THE WEST SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY.
20:41:24 AS FOR GATING, I DON'T SEE ANY STIPULATION FOR A GATE ON THE
20:41:31 SITE PLAN.
20:41:32 AND I BELIEVE THOSE WERE THE QUESTIONS, CHAIR?
20:41:35 I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANYTHING FURTHER.
20:41:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SYLLA?
20:41:43 >> THE SITE PLAN SHOWS, AS STAFF HAS INDICATED, THE
20:41:48 RELOCATED PORTABLES ARE INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN.
20:41:54 THE FENCING IS SOMETHING THAT WE WILL BE WORKING ON BUT
20:42:04 PRETTY MUCH IT WILL BE THERE WILL BE A FENCE IN THE FRONT OF
20:42:09 THE PROPERTY.
20:42:13 TO SECURE BASICALLY THE PARKING LOT.
20:42:15 THE EXISTING CHURCH IS IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, SO PRETTY
20:42:21 MUCH IT SERVES AS A BARRIER, SECURITY, IN TERMS OF ACCESS.
20:42:27 BUT THERE WILL BE A FENCE IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY.
20:42:31 BUT WHEN WE GET TO THE DESIGN LATER ON, THERE ARE ISSUES
20:42:36 THAT WE'LL BE WORKING THROUGH.
20:42:42 BUT CERTAINLY IF THE NEIGHBORS HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL ISSUES OR
20:42:45 CONCERNS, WE CERTAINLY WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ADDRESS
20:42:49 THEM.
20:42:50 AS FAR AS LIGHTING, YES, THERE WILL BE LIGHTING ON THE
20:42:53 PROPERTY, OBVIOUSLY, FOR NIGHTTIME SECURITY.
20:42:58 BUT THE OTHER ISSUE ALSO THAT THE NEIGHBOR RAISED RELATED TO
20:43:02 THE PARKING AREA, CURRENTLY IT'S USED AS PARKING.
20:43:10 IT'S JUST THAT IT'S NOT PAVED.
20:43:13 BUT RIGHT NOW THE CHURCH IS USING THAT, THE OPEN SPACE FOR
20:43:17 PARKING.
20:43:19 BUT IT'S GOING TO BE PAVED NOW, AND I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE
20:43:23 FORMALIZED EVENTUALLY AS A FUNCTIONING PARKING LOT.
20:43:29 SO I THINK THOSE ARE THE ISSUES THAT THE NEIGHBOR RAISED.
20:43:34 AND CERTAINLY WE WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO SEE WHAT
20:43:38 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS THEY HAVE SO WE CAN ADDRESS THEM,
20:43:41 BECAUSE THE CHURCH WANTS TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR, OBVIOUSLY.
20:43:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:43:46 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:43:51 >>RYAN MANASSE: CHAIR, IF I MAY.
20:43:53 I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT.
20:43:53 I WANT TO BE SURE AS LIE AT THE SITE PLAN, I DON'T SEE A
20:43:57 FENCE PROPOSED, AND AS YOU KNOW ON PDS, ALL FENCES NEED TO
20:44:02 BE SHOWN, LABELED, THE TYPE OF MATERIAL AS BEING SEMINOLE
20:44:06 HEIGHTS WOULD HAVE TO MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.
20:44:10 AND MY ONLY CONCERN -- AND I UNDERSTAND THE AGENT HAS TO TRY
20:44:15 TO SATISFY ANY CONCERN WITH THE PARKING LOT.
20:44:17 I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT WOULDN'T INHIBIT ANY KIND OF
20:44:21 TECHNICAL STANDARDS THAT TRANSPORTATION MAY COME INTO WITH
20:44:24 BEING ON-SITE.
20:44:25 I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM REQUEST IT BEING ADDED BETWEEN FIRST
20:44:27 AND SOAKED READING SUBJECT TO THE MEETING THE SEMINOLE
20:44:29 HEIGHTS CODE AS WELL AS JONATHAN'S TECHNICAL REVIEW.
20:44:33 AND HE'S ON SO MAYBE HE CAN ANSWER THAT, TOO.
20:44:36 AGAIN, SORRY FOR THE INTERRUPTION.
20:44:37 I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR, IF THAT'S GOING TO BE ADDED
20:44:41 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:44:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: JONATHAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:44:58 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: CITY OF TAMPA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
20:45:01 THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING A GATE ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY?
20:45:04 IS THAT WHAT -- IF THEY DID DO THAT, WE WOULD WANT THEM TO
20:45:12 PUTS NOTES WHETHER IT'S OPEN OR CLOSED.
20:45:14 IF IT'S KEPT OPEN DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.
20:45:18 SO IT'S NOT LIKE EVERYONE COME IN AND OPEN THE GATE.
20:45:26 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING WE CAN DO THAT.
20:45:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO, YOU ARE RECOGNIZE, SIR.
20:45:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: [OFF MICROPHONE] YOU CAN TELL HIM WHAT IS
20:45:44 REQUIRED SO HE CAN MAKE ACCOMMODATION BETWEEN FIRST AND
20:45:50 SECOND READING.
20:45:51 >>RYAN MANASSE: I MISSED THE FIRST HALF.
20:45:53 I WASN'T CATCHING AWFUL OF IT.
20:45:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I'M SORRY.
20:45:58 THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT THE FENCE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
20:46:00 PROPERTY.
20:46:03 WILL YOU PLEASE STATED THE SIZE OF THE FENCE, OR THE
20:46:06 REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT FENCE SO THAT THE PETITIONER KNOWS THE
20:46:09 EXACT REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING SO HE
20:46:13 CAN MAKE CHANGES?
20:46:14 >> YES, SIR.
20:46:17 JUST TO CLARIFY, YES, THE STAFF REPORT DOES DEPICT THE
20:46:20 REQUIRED CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IN
20:46:22 ADDITION TO THOSE WAIVERS BEING ADDED.
20:46:24 BUT AS THE SITE PLAN SHOWS, IT DOES SHOW AN EXISTING 6-FOOT
20:46:27 HIGH MASONRY WALL TO THE WEST.
20:46:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND ALSO IS THAT INCLUDED HOW TALL THAT OF
20:46:37 FOOT WALL HAS TO BE?
20:46:38 >> THERE'S ACTUALLY A 6-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE TO THE SOUTH.
20:46:42 JUST AGAIN FOR CLARIFICATION THE SOUTH IS ABUTTED BY THAT
20:46:44 SH-PD DISTRICT.
20:46:47 LET ME SHOW YOU THE AERIAL.
20:46:48 THAT MIGHT SHOW IT A LITTLE BETTER.
20:46:50 I'LL SHARE MY SCREEN ONE MORE TIME.
20:46:55 SO AS YOU CAN SEE HERE -- AND LET ME SEE IF I CAN ZOOM IN A
20:46:58 LITTLE BIT THERE FOR YOU.
20:47:00 THE SUBJECT SITE IN RED, AND THEN THIS IS HAD PD FOR THIS
20:47:05 AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE AND PARKING LOT IS THIS YELLOW RIGHT
20:47:09 HERE.
20:47:09 SO IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH IS THE SH-PD PARKING LOT FOR
20:47:14 THIS ESTABLISHMENT.
20:47:15 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. MANASSE.
20:47:19 I DIDN'T WANT ANY CONFUSION WITH THE PETITIONER BETWEEN
20:47:21 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:47:23 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
20:47:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OTHER QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
20:47:25 MOVE TO CLOSE?
20:47:30 MOVE TO CLOSE BY MR. MANISCALCO, SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:47:33 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:47:35 ANY OPPOSED?
20:47:35 ALL RIGHT.
20:47:37 WE GO BACK.
20:47:40 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU CAN HAVE --
20:47:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M A MAN OF MY WORD.
20:47:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 6.
20:47:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WITH REGARD TO FILE REZ 21-33, MOVE THE
20:47:58 ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
20:48:02 GENERAL VICINITY OF 106 WEST HAMILTON AVENUE IN THE CITY OF
20:48:06 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
20:48:08 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS,
20:48:13 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, SH-CG, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS,
20:48:18 COMMERCIAL GENERAL, AND SH-PD, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PLANNED
20:48:21 DEVELOPMENT, TO SH-PD, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, PLANNED
20:48:25 DEVELOPMENT, PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, PROVIDING AN
20:48:27 EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:48:29 SPECIFICALLY, I WILL FEIGNED THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS
20:48:34 BURDEN OF PROOF BY PROVIDING COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
20:48:37 THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITION AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
20:48:40 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE,
20:48:45 WITH THE -- WERE THERE WAIVERS REQUESTED ON THIS ONE?
20:48:50 >> YES.
20:48:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND INCLUDING THOSE WAIVERS.
20:48:53 I FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT
20:48:56 THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE.
20:49:02 AND I BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME CHANGES BEING MADE BETWEEN
20:49:05 FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:49:08 PURSUANT TO STAFF REPORT.
20:49:09 IS THAT CORRECT?
20:49:10 >> YES.
20:49:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
20:49:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER MOVED IT.
20:49:15 MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT.
20:49:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MANASSE, DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT OR
20:49:19 QUESTION?
20:49:21 >>RYAN MANASSE: WAS COUNCIL INCLUDING THE FENCE TO THE
20:49:23 NORTH?
20:49:23 SO I CAN MAKE SURE THAT ADD THAT AN OCCASION.
20:49:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, SIR.
20:49:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, SECOND.
20:49:33 ROLL CALL.
20:49:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:49:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:49:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:49:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:49:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:49:42 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:49:44 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
20:49:46 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT
20:49:49 9:30 A.M.
20:49:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: JUST FOR THE RECORD THE LADY ON THE SECOND
20:49:55 FLOOR REFERENCE TO THIS ITEM, LET HER KNOW THAT THERE WILL
20:49:57 BE SOME CHANGES.
20:50:03 ITEM NUMBER 7.
20:50:04 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CASE REZ 21-36.
20:50:13 IT'S FOR 2311 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE, PROPOSING A REZONING
20:50:18 FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
20:50:21 I'LL PASS ALONG TO DANNY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
20:50:23 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY WITH THE PLANNING
20:50:39 COMMISSION.
20:50:40 SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
20:50:53 THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:50:56 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:51:01 CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
20:51:03 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS PHILLIPS PARK
20:51:06 WHICH IS LOCATED .3 MILES TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:51:10 TWO TRANSIT STOPS ARE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE
20:51:13 FROM THE SUBJECT SITE, HART ROUTE 15 LOCATED TO THE NORTH
20:51:18 AND WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE, NORTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE, AND THE
20:51:22 ROUTE IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT NORTH BOULEVARD.
20:51:28 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE, AND A
20:51:31 PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH
20:51:33 HAZARD AREA.
20:51:37 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SURROUNDING
20:51:40 PROPERTIES, SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE.
20:51:42 IT'S IN THE PURPLE COLOR ON ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST
20:51:47 FRANCIS AVENUE.
20:51:48 YOU WILL SEE THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS
20:51:50 PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.
20:51:55 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:51:57 SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
20:52:01 DESIGNATION.
20:52:02 IT'S SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL ON ALL SIDES.
20:52:06 A PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
20:52:09 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS RELATES TO HOUSING IN THE CITY'S
20:52:12 POPULATION.
20:52:13 AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT
20:52:17 UNDERUTILIZED LANDS TO BE MAKE SURE THAT HOUSING IS PRESENT
20:52:22 TO MEET TAMPA'S POPULATIONS.
20:52:24 THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
20:52:27 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ALONG WITH THIS WITH RIDGEWOOD DRIVE AND
20:52:32 ENCOURAGED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
20:52:35 DESIGNATION.
20:52:36 THE PROPERTY IS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, AND ENSURE
20:52:40 THAT THERE WILL BE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON HURRICANE
20:52:43 EVACUATION TIMES [INDISCERNIBLE] FOR THE PROPOSED
20:52:49 DEVELOPMENT, ALSO TO MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS THAT MAY AFFECT
20:52:53 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
20:52:55 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
20:52:58 FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
20:53:00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:53:01 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
20:53:02 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:53:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
20:53:07 CITY STAFF.
20:53:07 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AGAIN.
20:53:15 CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN?
20:53:17 GREAT.
20:53:18 GOING TO CASE REZ 21-36, THE APPLICANT IS COURTNEY POE.
20:53:23 ALSO THE REPRESENTATIVE.
20:53:25 THE PROPERTY ADDRESS IS AGAIN 2311 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE.
20:53:30 IT'S A PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL
20:53:33 SINGLE-FAMILY TO 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:53:36 AGAIN THIS BEING A EUCLIDEAN, NO WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED.
20:53:43 GOING TO THE AERIAL MAP YOU WILL SEE AN OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE
20:53:45 PROPERTY OUTLINED HERE IN RED.
20:53:51 THE PROPERTY IS 100 FEET IN WIDTH AND 150 FEET IN LENGTH, AN
20:53:56 AREA OF 15,000 SQUARE FEET.
20:54:00 GOING TO THE NEXT SLIDE.
20:54:05 YOU WILL SEE ALSO THE LOT HERE.
20:54:07 LOTS 13 AND 14 ARE ON BLOCK M.
20:54:10 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED WITH A DETACHED
20:54:14 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE HOME.
20:54:16 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED HERE ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST
20:54:19 FRANCIS AVENUE AND NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE.
20:54:21 IT'S SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES TO THE
20:54:24 NORTH, SOUTH, WEST, AND EAST, ALL IN THE RS-60 ZONING
20:54:30 DISTRICT.
20:54:37 FOR THE OVERALL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE, 282 HOMES WERE LOOKED
20:54:45 AT.
20:54:46 138 OR 49% OF THOSE HOMES WERE DEVELOPED WITH A 60 FEET OR
20:54:51 GREATER.
20:54:52 144 OF THOSE HOMES OR 51% HAD A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
20:55:00 THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 9 TOTAL ZONING LOTS.
20:55:07 OF THOSE 9, 100% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED TO A
20:55:12 WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER.
20:55:14 STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REQUEST FOR THE REZONING
20:55:16 INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE
20:55:19 AREA AS PER THAT BLOCK.
20:55:23 LOOKING HERE AT THE SITE, TO THE SOUTH, RESIDENTIAL
20:55:31 SINGLE-FAMILY, TO THE SOUTHEAST, HOUSE HAS RESIDENTIAL
20:55:37 SINGLE-FAMILY, AND TO THE NORTH, WEST OF THE SITE YOU ALSO
20:55:40 HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:55:43 AS I SAID BEFORE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF
20:55:47 HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST
20:55:49 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
20:55:55 BY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
20:55:58 IMMEDIATE AREA AS SHOWN BEFORE.
20:56:00 THANK YOU.
20:56:01 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
20:56:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
20:56:04 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:56:06 ALL RIGHT.
20:56:07 APPLICANT.
20:56:08 >> GOOD EVENING.
20:56:10 MY NAME IS COURTNEY POE.
20:56:12 I AM THE APPLICANT AND THE FUTURE OWNER OF 2311 NORTH
20:56:15 RIVERSIDE DRIVE.
20:56:16 WE ARE ASKING THAT THE REZONE BE COMPLETED FROM RS 630 TO
20:56:22 RS-50 IN ORDER FOR US TO SPLIT THE LOT SO WE CAN BUILD A
20:56:25 DREAM HOME ON HALF OF THE LOT.
20:56:27 AS WE TALKED ABOUT AND THANK YOU, ZAIN, FOR SHARING THAT
20:56:31 INFORMATION.
20:56:31 THIS IS OVER 15,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT SO WE CURRENTLY LIVE IN
20:56:35 RIDGEWOOD PARK AND THIS IS ONE OF THE LARGEST LOTS IN THE
20:56:38 NEIGHBORHOOD, SO WE ARE VERY EXCITED TO FIND IN THE HOPES
20:56:40 THAT WE CAN SPLIT THIS LOT AND BUILD OUR HOME ON ONE SIDE
20:56:44 HELP MITIGATE THE COSTS.
20:56:46 THIS IS 150 FEET DEEP WHICH IS STANDARD LOT SIZE WOULD BE 60
20:56:52 BY 100, IF IT WERE RM 60.
20:56:54 SO IF WE SPLIT THE LOT WE WOULD BE AT 7500 SQUARE FEET WOO
20:56:58 WHERE WE WOULD ONLY NEED 6,000 SQUARE FEET TO CONFORM TO THE
20:57:01 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:57:01 AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE DO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD NOW
20:57:04 AND WE LIVE DOWN THE STREET.
20:57:06 SO THIS HOME IS KIND OF BEEN AN EYESORE FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE
20:57:09 IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:57:10 IT'S CURRENTLY A NONCONFORMING TRIPLEX THAT IS SITTING
20:57:13 VACANT AND WE ARE TRYING TO KEEP SQUATTERS OUT OF IT.
20:57:17 BUT TRYING TO FIGURE OUT SO THIS IS OUR FIRST TIME REZONING
20:57:20 A PROPERTY.
20:57:21 AND WE SAW IT WAS LISTED AS INCONSISTENT WITH THE
20:57:25 NEIGHBORHOOD WHEN WE GOT THE E-MAIL, AND KIND OF SHOCKING TO
20:57:28 US BECAUSE WE ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AS WE
20:57:32 LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE
20:57:34 SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HERE, AND THE
20:57:39 MAJORITY OF THESE LOTS TO WHERE WE CURRENTLY LIVE ARE
20:57:42 ALREADY NONCONFORMING, SO THEY MAY BE ZONED AS RS-60 BUT
20:57:47 THEY ARE BELOW 160 MINIMUM FRONTAGE.
20:57:53 SO I HOPE YOU GUYS WOULD AGAIN THAT THIS LOT IS SO BIG AND
20:57:56 NOT BEING FULLY UTILIZED AND KIND OF AN EYESORE, AND I THINK
20:58:01 BY IMPROVING IT AND SPLITTING IT AN PUTTING ONE HOUSE ON
20:58:04 EACH LOT, IT WOULD IMPROVE THE OVERALL AESTHETICS OF THE
20:58:08 NEIGHBORHOOD AND I MAKE EVERYTHING LOOK MUCH MORE NEIGHBOR.
20:58:12 UNFORTUNATELY I DON'T THINK ANY OF THEM ARE HERE TONIGHT
20:58:14 THAT CAN BACK US UP.
20:58:16 BUT WE JUST REALLY WANT TO MAINTAIN COMPATIBILITY OF THE
20:58:19 NEIGHBORHOOD AND THERE'S A NONCONFORMING TRIPLEX CURRENTLY
20:58:22 THERE AND I THINK IS UNDERUTILIZED, BECAUSE IT'S NOT
20:58:26 COMPATIBLE WITH THE CURRENT OWNER.
20:58:28 SO I GUESS THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE TO SAY. IF YOU HAVE ANY
20:58:31 QUESTIONS PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
20:58:33 I'M KIND OF LEARNING.
20:58:35 THANK YOU.
20:58:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: QUESTIONS NORTH APPLICANT.
20:58:37 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:58:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MRS. POE.
20:58:44 YOU SENT OUT NOTICE LETTERS PURSUANT TO THE CODE, CORRECT?
20:58:49 >> CORRECT.
20:58:50 YES.
20:58:51 I HEARD SOME PEOPLE DO NOT DO THAT CORRECTLY, BUT WE HAVE.
20:58:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
20:58:56 APPROXIMATELY, WHAT, 50 OR MORE?
20:59:00 >> I DON'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD BUT I BELIEVE IT
20:59:04 WAS SOMETIME BETWEEN 50 AND 60.
20:59:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DID YOU HEAR BACK FROM ANYBODY?
20:59:10 DID YOU PUT YOUR PHONE NUMBER ON THERE?
20:59:12 >> WE GOT CALLS, MOSTLY CURIOUS NEIGHBORS, BUT I DID GO
20:59:15 AROUND AND KNOCKED OWN A LOT OF DOORS TO MAKE SURE THIS IS
20:59:18 SOMETHING PEOPLE WOULD AGREE WITH.
20:59:19 I WAS TOLD SOMEONE WE SHOULD DO, AND SO OKAY, WE ARE AIMING
20:59:25 TO PUT SPLIT THIS LOT IN TWO SO WE CAN BUILD ON ONE SIDE.
20:59:29 AND WE GOT A LOT OF GOOD FEEDBACK AND THERE HAS BEEN A LOT
20:59:32 OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:59:33 IT'S A REALLY HOT AREA.
20:59:34 PEOPLE ARE FRIENDLY AND IT'S WALKABLE.
20:59:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WOULD YOU PUT THE MAP UP AGAIN AND POINT
20:59:40 TO THE SUBJECT LOT?
20:59:41 I AM HAVING A LITTLE TROUBLE.
20:59:42 >> I KNOW, IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE.
20:59:45 THIS ONE RIGHT HERE WITH THE STRAINS THROUGH IT.
20:59:47 SO YOU CAN SEE IT'S QUITE LARGE.
20:59:53 AND THEN THIS ONE.
20:59:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND IS THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE
20:59:59 SOUTH IN THE YELLOW?
21:00:01 >> YES.
21:00:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS THAT --
21:00:03 >> THAT'S CURRENTLY A VACANT LOT.
21:00:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS THAT A 50-FOOT LOT?
21:00:07 >> THAT IS --
21:00:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?
21:00:10 >> OH, I'M NOT SURE.
21:00:12 I THINK THERE'S A KEY ON HERE.
21:00:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HARD TO TELL ON THE COLORS.
21:00:15 >> YEAH, I THINK THAT ONE MAY BE AN RS-60.
21:00:20 I THINK THE ONE BEHIND IS 50 HERE FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY.
21:00:26 THEY HAVE A 50-FOOT LOT WITH A NEWER CONSTRUCTION HOME.
21:00:29 ANOTHER HERE.
21:00:30 AND THEN THE --
21:00:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE LIGHT BLUE.
21:00:35 >> CORRECT. IT'S HARD TO SEE.
21:00:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO WHEN YOU WALKED AROUND THE
21:00:41 NEIGHBORHOOD, DID ANYBODY OBJECT?
21:00:43 >> NO.
21:00:43 I MEAN THE NEIGHBORS KIND OF LOVE US SO I HOPE NOT.
21:00:46 WE GOT A LOT OF CALLS BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE JUST VERY CURIOUS.
21:00:52 I GUESS IT WAS FORMERLY A HALFWAY HOUSE AND A NONCONFORMING
21:00:56 TRIPLEX SO PEOPLE ARE VERY CURIOUS WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH IT
21:00:59 BECAUSE IT'S AN EYESORE I GUESS IN ITS CURRENT STATE.
21:01:03 >> SO YOU ARE GOING TO BUILD YOUR HOUSE ON IT.
21:01:05 >> WE HOPE TO TAKE THE CORNER LOT.
21:01:07 AND IF YOU SEE FIT.
21:01:11 IT'S PRETTY EXPENSIVE SO UNFORTUNATELY CAN'T BUILD JUST ONE
21:01:15 MASSIVE HOUSE ON IT.
21:01:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:01:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
21:01:22 ALL RIGHT.
21:01:23 ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR REFERENCE TO THIS ITEM?
21:01:32 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
21:01:33 THERE IS NO ONE ELSE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.
21:01:37 >>THE CLERK: ANYBODY REGISTERED?
21:01:39 >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
21:01:42 >> MR. MANISCALCO MOVED AND -- SECONDS.
21:01:48 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:01:49 OPPOSED?
21:01:50 MOTION CARRIED.
21:01:50 WE GO BACK TO MR. MANISCALCO.
21:01:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
21:01:56 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2311 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE IN THE
21:02:00 CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
21:02:03 SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60
21:02:06 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
21:02:10 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:02:12 I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THEIR BURDEN OF PROOF TO
21:02:15 PROVIDE COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE
21:02:18 DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
21:02:22 CITY CODE.
21:02:24 I FEIGNED THAT IT'S CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE OBJECTIVES 2.1
21:02:28 AND POLICY 2.12 AND HOUSING POLICY 1.34.
21:02:33 WHICH ENCOURAGES THE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT ON UNDERUTILIZED
21:02:37 SITES.
21:02:39 IT IS MENTIONED THAT THIS IS A NONCONFORMING TRIPLEX WITH A
21:02:43 HISTORY OF ISSUES, SO THIS WOULD IMPROVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD,
21:02:48 CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE OBJECTIVES 9.2.
21:02:53 THERE IS CLEARLY AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR
21:02:56 RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES CONSIDERING THE SIZE OF THIS LOT, THAT
21:03:00 WAS MENTIONED.
21:03:01 AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE IT.
21:03:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
21:03:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WILL SECOND THE MOTION IF IT HASN'T
21:03:12 BEEN SECONDED ALREADY.
21:03:14 AND SPECIFICALLY, I'LL SUPPORT THE MOTION.
21:03:17 NORMALLY I'M NOT THRILLED WITH LOT SPLITS ESPECIALLY WHEN
21:03:21 STAFF HAS SHOWN THAT IT'S TO A CERTAIN EXTENT AT LEAST
21:03:27 STATISTICALLY INCONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
21:03:31 HOWEVER, IT DOESN'T SEEM -- THAT'S A VERY ACTIVE
21:03:36 NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THEY DO COME OUT ON OCCASION WHEN THEY
21:03:39 DON'T LIKE SOMETHING, BUT CLEARLY THEY ARE NOT HERE TONIGHT,
21:03:45 THEY ARE NOTICED, WE DON'T HAVE ANY LETTERS IN THE FILE OF
21:03:49 OBJECTION, SO THAT DOES INFLUENCE ME.
21:03:51 AND I AGREE WITH MR. MANISCALCO, I THINK THAT PERHAPS ONE OF
21:03:53 THE REASONS THAT THEY ARE NOT OBJECTING IS THE FACT THAT THE
21:03:57 SINGLE STRUCTURE THAT STRADDLES THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW IS
21:04:03 LESS THAN DESIRABLE.
21:04:03 SO IN LIGHT OF THAT, I SUPPORT THE MOTION.
21:04:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED THE MOTION.
21:04:09 MR. DINGFELDER SECONDED.
21:04:11 ROLL SCHEDULE, PLEASE.
21:04:11 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:04:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:04:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
21:04:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:04:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:04:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:04:20 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
21:04:22 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT
21:04:25 9:30 A.M.
21:04:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
21:04:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LOOKS LIKE YOU FOUND A NEW CALLING.
21:04:33 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
21:04:35 VERY EXCITED.
21:04:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 8.
21:04:38 >> THANK YOU.
21:04:38 HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.
21:04:39 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:04:43 CASE REZ 21-37.
21:04:46 THIS FOR 412 WEST PARK AVENUE, PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-16
21:04:51 TO RM-18.
21:04:54 I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, DANNY.
21:04:57 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING
21:05:01 COMMISSION STAFF.
21:05:02 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:05:03 NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE
21:05:06 SPECIFICALLY WITH THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
21:05:09 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS ROBERT PARK
21:05:13 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE EAST OF THE SUBJECT
21:05:15 SITE.
21:05:16 CLOSEST PUBLIC TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED 1. MILES TO THE WEST
21:05:20 OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON NORTH BOULEVARD.
21:05:22 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
21:05:26 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
21:05:29 SURROUNDING BROUGHT.
21:05:30 THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN PURPLE COLOR, WEST PARK AVENUE,
21:05:35 AND THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY
21:05:38 RESIDENTIAL.
21:05:41 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE SUBJECT SITE
21:05:45 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
21:05:49 AS YOU MOVE WEST, WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD, PARCELS ARE
21:05:54 RECOGNIZED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10, AND A COUPLE BLOCKS TO
21:05:59 THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER
21:06:02 THE RMU 100 DESIGNATION.
21:06:05 THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSIDERATION OF THREE RESIDENTIAL
21:06:11 UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE, AN OVERALL DENSITY OF -- DWELLING
21:06:14 UNITS PER ACRE.
21:06:15 THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE UNDERLYING LAND USE DESIGNATION,
21:06:19 AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
21:06:22 URBAN VILLAGE.
21:06:24 THE ZONING DISTRICT ARE -- NOT PRESENT IN THE SURROUNDING
21:06:28 AREA, WITH -- ZONING DISTRICT.
21:06:35 PROVIDE A HIGHER DENSITY FOR GREATER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
21:06:38 IS IN SPARED, LAND USE POLICY 9.6.3.
21:06:41 THIS REZONING WILL PROVIDE MORE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING CHOICES
21:06:44 FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
21:06:47 ALSO, CREATE ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN THE AREA OF THE
21:06:51 CITY IN WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO PROVIDE A MIX
21:06:55 OF HOUSING TYPES AND DIRECT THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH
21:06:58 WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY TOMORROW STRATEGY.
21:07:02 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FIND THE STAFF CONSISTENT WITH
21:07:05 THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:07:06 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
21:07:08 AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:07:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
21:07:11 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:07:19 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN?
21:07:33 APPLICANT IS JPS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT.
21:07:37 JOHN N. LAROCCA FROM LAROCCA CONSULTING GROUP.
21:07:43 ADDRESS IS 412 WEST PARK AVENUE.
21:07:46 THERE IS A REZONING FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, 16,
21:07:49 TO RM-18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, 18.
21:07:53 THIS BEING A EUCLIDEAN, THERE ARE NO WAIVERS PERMITTED.
21:07:59 IF WE LOOK AT AN AERIAL MAP YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT
21:08:03 PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED.
21:08:06 IT FACES WEST PARK AVENUE.
21:08:08 TO THE NORTH.
21:08:09 TO THE WEST YOU WILL HAVE NORTH BOULEVARD RUNNING NORTH AND
21:08:12 SOUTH.
21:08:14 TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE NORTH MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE.
21:08:18 AND THEN TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE WEST ROSS AVENUE.
21:08:22 AND DOWN HERE IS ARMATURE WORKS.
21:08:26 THE SITE IS 60 FEET IN WIDTH AND 132 FEET IN DEPTH, FOR AN
21:08:32 AREA OF 7,920 SQUARE FEET.
21:08:34 THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
21:08:40 STRUCTURE.
21:08:41 THE PROPERTY SURROUNDED BY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS TO THE
21:08:44 NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST IN THIS RM-16 ZONING DISTRICT.
21:08:50 YOU SEE THE CURRENT STRUCTURE.
21:08:54 GOING ON-SITE, TOOK A PICTURE OF THE SITE ITSELF.
21:08:58 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU HAVE A SINGLE-FAMILY
21:09:00 RESIDENTIAL.
21:09:02 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE THAT SINGLE-FAMILY
21:09:05 RESIDENTIAL.
21:09:06 ACROSS THE STREET.
21:09:08 AND THEN TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, AGAIN, YOU HAVE THE
21:09:12 RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
21:09:15 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
21:09:18 APPLICATION AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
21:09:21 OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
21:09:23 THANK YOU.
21:09:24 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:09:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
21:09:30 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
21:09:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:09:38 I DON'T UNDERSTAND, ZAIN, AS I LOOKED AT THE AERIAL -- CAN
21:09:43 YOU PUT THE AERIAL BACK ON?
21:09:45 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN AGAIN?
21:09:55 >>THE CLERK: YOU CAN HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN.
21:10:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN YOU ZOOM IN ON THAT A LITTLE
21:10:09 TIGHTER?
21:10:11 >> CAN WE ZOOM IN HERE?
21:10:14 I DON'T BELIEVE I CAN ZOOM IN.
21:10:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE.
21:10:19 BUT YOU HAVE BEEN OUT THERE OBVIOUSLY TAKING PICTURES.
21:10:24 I HAVE HAD COMPLAINTS FROM THAT NEIGHBORHOOD GENERICALLY
21:10:29 ABOUT THE LARGE MULTIFAMILY BEING BUILT INCONSISTENT WITH
21:10:35 THE SINGLE-FAMILY, TRADITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY UP AND DOWN THE
21:10:40 STREET.
21:10:40 AND MOST OF THEM THAT I CAN RECALL DID NOT COME TO COUNCIL.
21:10:47 THEY MUST HAVE COME THROUGH A DIFFERENT ROUTE.
21:10:49 BUT HERE WE ARE WITH THIS ONE, UNDER THE EXISTING RM-16,
21:10:56 ALLOWED A DUPLEX TWO, UNITS ON A 60-FOOT LOT BUT THEY ARE
21:11:01 ACTUALLY ASKING FOR THREE UNITS ACCORDING TO THE STAFF
21:11:03 REPORT FOR THIS 60-FOOT LOT BUT IT APPEARS TO ME, IN LOOKING
21:11:09 UP AND DOWN THAT STREET, I CAN'T SWEAR TO IT, AND I DON'T
21:11:13 WANT TO TESTIFY, MR. SHELBY, THAT'S WHY I AM ASKING YOU,
21:11:17 ZAIN, IT APPEARS TO ME THERE'S A LOT OF SINGLE-FAMILY
21:11:19 DETACHED ON THAT BLOCK ON BOTH SIDES, NORTH AND SOUTH.
21:11:24 SO WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BUILD TWO UNITS.
21:11:27 WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN ARE WE SAYING THAT THREE UNITS IS
21:11:30 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND ALL OF OUR GOALS AND
21:11:34 OBJECTIVES?
21:11:35 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: LOOKING AT IT HERE, I DO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU
21:11:43 ARE SAYING BUT THE CONSISTENCY MATRIX ALLOWS THEM TO DO UP
21:11:46 TO THREE UNITS THERE.
21:11:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I UNDERSTAND THAT.
21:11:48 BUT YOU ARE TRAINED AND EDUCATED AS A PLANNER, AND WHAT I AM
21:11:57 TALKING ABOUT IS GOOD PLANNING, AND FROM A PLANNING
21:12:01 PERSPECTIVE, AND LOOKING AT THOSE POLICIES, WE HAVE A LOT OF
21:12:06 POLICIES THAT SPEAK TO NEIGHBORHOOD CONSISTENCY.
21:12:09 AND LIKE I SAY, I AM GETTING OBJECTIONS IN THAT AREA FROM
21:12:12 PEOPLE ON ROSS, FRANCES, AND PARK THAT SAY THAT THEIR
21:12:17 NEIGHBORHOOD IS GETTING OVERRUN WITH BIG -- I DON'T KNOW,
21:12:22 THAT'S GOING TO BE A VERY LARGE MONOLITHIC STRUCTURE BY THE
21:12:27 TIME YOU GO THREE FLOORS, 35 FEET, I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW YOU
21:12:34 GET THREE UNITS ON THERE AT 60 FEET WIDE.
21:12:38 BUT ANYWAY I AM JUST WONDERING IF THOSE ARE CONSIDERATIONS
21:12:41 THAT STAFF HAS DISCUSSED.
21:12:42 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: IT WAS.
21:12:45 ALSO ANALYZED AND LOOKED AT, BUT THE CONSISTENCY MATRIX IN
21:12:50 THE CODE, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO THAT MANY UNITS.
21:12:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO IT, BUT ALLOWED
21:12:57 TO DO IT UNDER TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUT THERE'S IN A
21:13:00 WHERE IN THE CODE THAT SAYS WHEN IT COMES TO REZONING THAT
21:13:03 WE ARE REQUIRED TO ALLOW THE MAX.
21:13:05 CORRECT?
21:13:05 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: THAT'S CORRECT.
21:13:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.
21:13:08 THANK YOU.
21:13:09 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU BROUGHT UP A GOOD
21:13:12 POINT.
21:13:12 I AM NOT IDENTIFYING.
21:13:22 [~DISTORTION~] I KNOW PARK AVENUE VERY, VERY WELL.
21:13:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MONOPOLY OR WHAT?
21:13:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL THE WAY.
21:13:32 THE HOUSES NOW ALL THE WAY UP TO THE FRONT, WAY IN THE BACK.
21:13:37 SO I KNOW IT VERY WELL.
21:13:38 BUT I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU ARE GOING WITH THAT, AND THE
21:13:40 CONSISTENCY SEEMS TO HAVE CHANGED ALONG THAT BLOCK.
21:13:44 SO YOU WOULD BE CORRECT WHAT YOU ARE STATING, AND THE STAFF
21:13:48 NEEDS TO REALIZE, JUST BECAUSE IT'S IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IT
21:13:51 SEEMS THAT IT'S CHANGING SOME OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEN YOU
21:13:55 LOOK AT THAT AREA ON PARK STREET.
21:14:00 SO I THINK MR. DINGFELDER DOES HAVE A POINT.
21:14:04 WE ARE DOING FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC PLAN BUT WE ARE SAYING
21:14:07 CONSISTENCY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:14:09 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT.
21:14:13 TWO THINGS.
21:14:13 NUMBER ONE, DO YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ELICIT STATEMENTS
21:14:18 OR FACTS FROM EVERYONE WHO TESTIFIES, WHETHER THEY ARE STAFF
21:14:21 OR THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIVE, AND ALSO JUST A
21:14:25 REMAINDER, THAT ULTIMATELY THE PETITIONER HAS NOT ADDRESSED
21:14:30 COUNCIL YET.
21:14:31 SO YOU MAY WANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES WITH THE PETITIONER,
21:14:34 AND ALSO THAT ULTIMATELY YOUR DECISION HAS TO BE BASED ON
21:14:39 COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD.
21:14:41 SO WHATEVER IT TAKES FOR THAT TO BE IN THE RECORD IS WHAT
21:14:44 YOU MUST RELY ON.
21:14:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY.
21:14:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
21:14:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYTHING ELSE FROM STAFF?
21:14:53 THE APPLICANT.
21:14:53 >> ARE WE READY?
21:14:55 THIS IS JOHN LAROCCA.
21:14:56 AGENT FOR THE OWNER APPLICANT JPF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT.
21:15:03 MY ADDRESS IS 101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND
21:15:06 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
21:15:09 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND THE DEVELOPMENT
21:15:11 COORDINATION STAFF HAVE MADE THEIR PRESENTATIONS, AND I AM
21:15:15 ASSUMING ALL OF US HAVE THE REPORTS, AND I AM NOT GOING TO
21:15:19 READ EVERY POLICY, EVERY OBJECTIVE, BUT TELL YOU A LITTLE
21:15:25 BIT ABOUT THE SITE AND WHY THE APPLICANT IS INTERESTED IN
21:15:28 REZONING TO RM-18 FROM RM-16.
21:15:32 THERE IS ONE CORRECTION ON PAGE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT, THE
21:15:34 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF REPORT, AND I THINK COMMENTS
21:15:37 WERE CORRECT THIS EVENING THAT THERE IS A DUPLEX ON THE
21:15:40 PROPERTY OR TWO UNIT STRUCTURE.
21:15:42 THE ADDRESS IS IN THE SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST ON PAGE 1
21:15:45 ACTUALLY 412 WEST PARK AVENUE, AND THERE IS A 2-UNIT
21:15:49 STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY NOW.
21:15:51 THE AREA, WE STUDIED THE AREA.
21:15:53 THE APPLICANT WHO HAS OWNED THE PROPERTY FOR A NUMBER OF
21:15:57 YEARS NOW, AND HAS MAINTAINED IT AS AND PURCHASED IT AS A
21:16:01 TWO-UNIT STRUCTURE.
21:16:03 IS RECOGNIZING THE CHANGES THAT ARE OCCURRING NOT ONLY
21:16:06 THROUGH ALLOWANCES IN THE COMP PLAN, BUT THE GENERAL
21:16:11 CHARACTER OF THE EXPANDING URBAN CORE.
21:16:15 THIS SITE IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT, AND
21:16:20 SPECIFICALLY ARMATURE WORKS, AT A VERY HIGH LAND USE
21:16:24 INTENSITY.
21:16:24 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AGAIN I CAN SHOW YOU ALL THE MAPS,
21:16:28 THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET, AND BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
21:16:31 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF ATTESTED TO THAT, THAT THE
21:16:35 AREA IS A CORE OF R-35 RESIDENTIAL 35, THAT DOES ALLOW
21:16:41 CONSIDERATION OF HIGHER INTENSITY.
21:16:43 IT IS THE INTENT, ALTHOUGH THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REQUEST, IT
21:16:47 IS THE INTENT OF THE OWNER TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH ONE
21:16:51 ADDITIONAL UNIT TOWARD THE REAR OF THE LOT, 130 FEET DEEP.
21:16:57 AND TO ADD A SECOND UNIT AT THE REAR OF THE SITE WITH
21:17:03 FIRST-LEVEL PARKING.
21:17:05 PARKING WILL BE ACCOMMODATED.
21:17:06 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING SOUGHT OR WILL BE
21:17:09 SOUGHT.
21:17:10 OTHERWISE, THE DEVELOPMENT WOULDN'T FIT.
21:17:13 IF IT DIDN'T FIT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT SOMETHING ELSE OR WE
21:17:16 WOULDN'T BE PURSUING THIS.
21:17:18 THERE'S BEEN SOME PRELIMINARY WORK DONE THAT WOULD SUGGEST
21:17:21 THAT THE SITE CAN BE DEVELOPED, THAT WILL BE IMPROVED TO BE
21:17:26 CONSISTENT MORE THAN WHAT IT IS NOW AS BASICALLY A BOXY
21:17:30 TWO-UNIT STRUCTURE WITH NOT MUCH CHARACTER TO IT.
21:17:35 THE EXAMPLE WE MADE AS AN UPGRADE TO THE PROPERTY THAT WILL
21:17:39 GIVE IT SOME TENDENCY TO CREATE SOME ARCHITECTURAL
21:17:42 SIGNIFICANCE, ALBEIT THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN DISTRICT AND WE
21:17:46 CAN'T COMMIT TO THAT RIGHT NOW, BUT THAT IS THE INTENT.
21:17:50 AND I WILL STATE THAT FOR THE RECORD.
21:17:53 THE AREA IS CHANGING.
21:17:56 THE AREA HAS BEEN CLARIFIED, FULL, IF YOU GO BACK INTO THE
21:18:02 HISTORY AND READ THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT ABOUT THE
21:18:09 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT ARE ESTABLISHED FOR THE
21:18:11 RESIDENTIAL 35 IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA.
21:18:14 AND I WOULD LIKE TO READ JUST ONE PARAGRAPH AT THE
21:18:17 CONCLUSION RATHER THAN READING ALL THE POLICIES OF WHY I
21:18:20 BELIEVE IT'S CONSISTENT.
21:18:22 AND I REFER TO THE DOCUMENT.
21:18:25 I AGREE WITH ALL THE LAND USE POLICIES, AND NOT TO READ THEM
21:18:29 TO BE REPETITIVE, I DO WANT TO READ ON PAGE 5 OF THE
21:18:32 PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT IN BOLD PRINT RIGHT BEFORE THE
21:18:37 RECOMMENDATION OF CONSISTENCY, IS THAT MULTIFAMILY IS
21:18:40 ENCOURAGED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
21:18:44 TO PROVIDE A HIGHER DENSITY WHERE GREATER RESIDENTIAL
21:18:47 DEVELOPMENT IS SCARED, SPECIFICALLY RANDY'S POLICY 9.6.3.
21:18:51 THIS REZONING WILL PROVIDE MORE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING CHOICES
21:18:54 FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATION GROWTH WHILE ALSO
21:18:57 CREATING ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN OUR AREA OF
21:18:59 THE CITY IN WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO PROVIDE A
21:19:03 MIX OF HOUSING TAPES, AND DIRECT THE GREATEST SHARE OF
21:19:06 GROWTH.
21:19:07 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY AS WAS
21:19:10 MENTIONED BY DANNY COLLINS EARLIER.
21:19:12 AND OF COURSE WRITTEN INTO THAT PARAGRAPH ARE THE VARIOUS
21:19:15 POLICIES.
21:19:16 I WOULD LIKE TO SUMMARIZE BY SAYING THAT, YES, THERE ARE
21:19:20 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOMES ON THAT BLOCK OF VARYING AGES
21:19:27 AND VARYING CONDITIONS, BUT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TODAY
21:19:32 IS WANTING TO MAKE AN IMPROVEMENT OF THIS PROPERTY, AND TO
21:19:35 MAKE THAT IMPROVEMENT FELT IT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:19:39 RESIDENTIAL 35 CLASSIFICATION, AND IT WOULD BE COMPLETELY
21:19:44 COMPATIBLE, THAT WOULD BE ABOUT 16.5 UNITS PER ACRE,
21:19:49 SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE RM-16 THAT EXISTS NOW, BUT WOULD
21:19:52 ALLOW THE THIRD UNIT TO IMPROVE THAT SITE, TO LOOK TOWARD
21:19:58 THE FUTURE WITH HOW THAT AREA WILL BE DEVELOPED CONSISTENT
21:20:02 WITH THE LONG-RANGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED THROUGH THE
21:20:06 HISTORY OF THAT PROCESS.
21:20:07 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST CONSIDERATION OF THIS APPROVAL.
21:20:11 IT IS FOUND INCONSISTENT [SIC] BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
21:20:14 STAFF, AND THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF, AND BY ALL
21:20:17 DEPARTMENTS.
21:20:20 AGAIN, PEOPLE MAY NOT HAVE CHOSEN TO CALL BUT WE NOTIFIED
21:20:24 ALL THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS.
21:20:26 I HAVE HAD TWO CALLS, AND THE CALLS WERE SIMPLY INQUIRIES
21:20:29 ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY IS PROPOSED IN THE RM-18, AND I ANSWERED
21:20:32 THE QUESTION, THERE WAS NO COMMENT MADE, SO WE RESPECTFULLY
21:20:36 REQUEST CONSIDERATION OF THIS REZONING FROM RM-16 TO RM-18,
21:20:41 CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 35 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION.
21:20:45 AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ANY ANSWER QUESTIONS.
21:20:48 THANK YOU.
21:20:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS BY COUNCIL?
21:20:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE ONE QUESTION.
21:20:53 MR. LAROCCA, GOOD EVENING.
21:21:00 UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING OF THE RM-16 YOUR CLIENT WOULD
21:21:13 BUILD TWO ATTACHED SIDE BY SIDE TOWNHOMES.
21:21:16 BUT I GUESS WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ADD IS THAT THIRD UNIT IN
21:21:18 THE BACKYARD.
21:21:19 >> CORRECT.
21:21:21 SECOND FLOOR UNIT.
21:21:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S NOT THAT WE ARE FORCING HIM TO DO A
21:21:31 SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT BECAUSE WE ARE NOT.
21:21:33 UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING, HE CAN BUILD ASIDE BY SIDE TOWN
21:21:38 HOME, AND THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITIES, TEAR DOWN THE EXISTING
21:21:44 DUPLEX, WHICH I AM SURE PERHAPS MANY PEOPLE IN THE
21:21:47 NEIGHBORHOOD, I DIDN'T LOOK AT IT, SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT
21:21:50 LOOKS LIKE.
21:21:50 YOU ARE SAYING IT WOULD BE AN IMPROVEMENT TO TEAR IT DOWN.
21:21:58 AND I'LL TAKE YOUR WORD FOR IT.
21:22:00 BUT IT NOT LIKE THERE'S NO OTHER CHOICE.
21:22:05 HE OR SHE COULD BUILD TWO UNIT SIDE BY SIDE DUPLEXES, IS
21:22:10 THAT CORRECT?
21:22:11 >> THAT IS CORRECT.
21:22:12 AND THE INTENT, TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, THE INTENT TO BE
21:22:14 CLEAR ABOUT IT AT THIS POINT IS NOT TO TEAR IT DOWN BUT TO
21:22:17 ADD A THIRD UNIT TO THE REAR, AND IMPROVE THE FACADE THAT
21:22:22 FACES THE STREET.
21:22:23 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE STANDARD.
21:22:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GOT IT.
21:22:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
21:22:35 ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR OR ANYONE SIGNED IN?
21:22:41 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
21:22:42 THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
21:22:44 THANK YOU.
21:22:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
21:22:47 >> WE DID HAVE JEAN ZERO MAYOR BUT SHE'S NOT LOGGED ON.
21:22:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE?
21:22:56 MR. MANISCALCO MOVES, MR. MIRANDA SECONDS.
21:22:59 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:23:00 OPPOSED?
21:23:01 MR. CARLSON, WOULD YOU READ THIS ITEM?
21:23:05 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:23:07 I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE REZ 21-37, ORDINANCE BEING
21:23:11 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE
21:23:13 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 412 WEST PARK
21:23:16 AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY
21:23:19 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
21:23:22 RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO RM-18 RESIDENTIAL
21:23:26 MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:23:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
21:23:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: [OFF MICROPHONE]
21:23:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THE MOTION.
21:23:36 SO MY POINT EARLIER, PERHAPS NOW FOR THE THIRD OR FOURTH
21:23:43 TIME, I CAME ACROSS SOME LANGUAGE THAT I THINK IS RELEVANT,
21:23:50 SO I WILL PARAPHRASE IT.
21:23:52 THE LANGUAGE ITSELF, WHILE THE PROPOSED REZONING MAY BE
21:23:55 ALLOWED FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE
21:23:58 DESIGNATION, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONCLUDED
21:24:01 THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:24:03 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS STATED UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE
21:24:07 CATEGORY, IN THIS CASE, IN MY OPINION, I WOULD FIND THAT THE
21:24:13 MAXIMUM DENSITY AND PERMITTED UNDER THE PROPOSED REZONING IS
21:24:18 NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT
21:24:21 CHARACTERIZED BY THIS PROPOSAL.
21:24:24 AND I THINK THAT'S MY POINT, IF I DON'T -- YOU KNOW, I THINK
21:24:32 BUILDING A NEW DUPLEX OR IN THIS CASE LEAVING THE EXISTING
21:24:35 DUPLEX IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S GOING ON IN THIS
21:24:37 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:24:38 I THINK THIRD UNIT, ON A 60-FOOT LOT, I THINK IS NOT
21:24:45 CONSISTENT.
21:24:45 IT MIGHT BE CONSISTENT IN SOME, YOU KNOW, FUTURE CONTEXT,
21:24:52 AND MAYBE THAT'S WHAT THE COMP PLAN IS ABOUT.
21:24:54 COMP PLAN LASS AT 20 YEARS, BUT THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY
21:24:58 MEAN THAT IN THIS PARTICULAR YEAR 2021 THAT THAT'S WHERE
21:25:02 THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS AT.
21:25:04 AND I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE CRAMMING IN THAT KIND OF
21:25:08 DENSITY ON THIS PROPERTY AT THIS TIME.
21:25:11 AND AS I STATED, NOT ON ANY CASE IN PARTICULAR, BUT I HAVE
21:25:17 BEEN HEARING FROM THIS NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THEY ARE NOT HAPPY
21:25:19 AT ALL WITH THE CHANGING OF THE CHARACTER OF THIS
21:25:25 NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:25:26 SO I RESPECT HIM GREATLY, CANNOT RESPECTFULLY SUPPORT THIS
21:25:35 MOTION.
21:25:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: [OFF MICROPHONE]
21:25:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO: (ROLL CALL)
21:25:47 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
21:25:56 DINGFELDER AND GUDES VOTING NO.
21:25:57 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT
21:26:01 9:30 A.M.
21:26:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 9.
21:26:05 >> THANK YOU, SIR.
21:26:09 ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ 21-39, THIS IS FOR 201, 205 AND 207 SOUTH
21:26:17 ARMENIA AVENUE AND 2506 CLEVELAND STREET PROPOSING REZONING
21:26:23 FROM PD TO PD.
21:26:25 I WILL PASS ALONG TO PLANNING COMMISSION, DANNY.
21:26:27 >> DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:26:37 BEFORE WE GET STARTED, I WANT TO MENTION A FEW CHANGES TO
21:26:40 OUR REPORT FOR THE RECORD.
21:26:43 CONSISTENCY FINDING IN THE ORIGINAL REPORT AND THE SUMMARY
21:26:47 TABLE IS INCORRECT.
21:26:49 CONSISTENCY FINDINGS SHOULD BE INCONSISTENT.
21:26:57 ALSO, THE REMOVAL OF THE GRAND OAK TREE DESCRIBED IN THE
21:27:00 LAST PARAGRAPH DO NOT PRESENT ANY COMP PLAN RELATED ISSUES.
21:27:04 SO THOSE WERE OMITTED FROM THE REPORT, IN THE REVISED
21:27:08 REPORT, AND THAT REPORT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD.
21:27:16 THIS CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE
21:27:18 SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD, CLOSEST
21:27:22 PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS VILLA BROTHERS PARK LOCATED A
21:27:26 HALF MILE TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:27:28 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED 540 FEET TO THE
21:27:33 SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON SOUTH ARMENIA AVENUE.
21:27:36 THE SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
21:27:43 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
21:27:45 SURROUNDING PROPERTY, ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH
21:27:48 ARMENIA AVENUE AND WEST CLEVELAND STREET, OUTLINED IN THIS
21:27:51 PURPLE COLOR.
21:27:52 YOU WILL SEE A PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES, SOUTH
21:27:57 ARMENIA AVENUE, AND ALSO ALONG WEST CLEVELAND STREET.
21:28:05 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, ADOPTED FUTURE LAND
21:28:09 USE MAP.
21:28:10 MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDER THE UMU-60
21:28:13 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND 1.4 ACRES RECOGNIZED UNDER
21:28:18 THE RESIDENTIAL.
21:28:21 UMU-60 FOUND ALONG ARMENIA AVENUE, NORTH OF WEST PLATT
21:28:27 STREET, AND THEN [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] WEST ALONG CLEVELAND
21:28:33 AVENUE, AND THEN ALSO RESIDENTIAL 35 INAUDIBLE.
21:28:40 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND
21:28:43 THE PROPOSAL -- [~DISTORTION~]
21:28:50 THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATE OF THE SITE MAXIMUM DWELLING
21:28:57 UNITS, APPROXIMATELY A THIRD UNIT LOCATED WITHIN THE
21:29:01 RESIDENTIAL -- [INDISCERNIBLE]
21:29:06 ANY DEVELOPMENT, ALSO NOT THE DENSITIES AND TESTIFYING FROM
21:29:10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
21:29:12 I DO WANT TO MENTION, THERE IS A PENDING PLAN AMENDMENT,
21:29:18 INTENSITY, THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN ONE OR MORE FUTURE
21:29:21 LAND USE CATEGORIES IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
21:29:25 THIS WOULD APPLY TO THIS REZONING.
21:29:29 HOWEVER IT'S CURRENTLY PENDING.
21:29:31 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATION IT IS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
21:29:33 FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
21:29:35 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:29:37 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
21:29:38 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:29:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:29:41 YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
21:29:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST PROCEDURALLY, I AM LOOKING ON SIRE,
21:29:46 AND I DON'T SEE THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT ATTACHED TO
21:29:50 THE -- USUALLY IT'S ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT.
21:29:55 BUT I DON'T SEE IT.
21:29:58 SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS PART OF THE RECORD.
21:30:04 DANNY, IF YOU COULD RETRACE THE REASON YOU ARE FINDING IT
21:30:08 INCONSISTENT IS BECAUSE OF THE NUMBERS DON'T ADD UP, AND
21:30:12 SPECIFICALLY WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS?
21:30:13 >>DANNY COLLINS: CURRENTLY, THERE IS FUTURE LAND USE
21:30:19 CATEGORY EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL
21:30:24 20 PORTION OF THE SITE, THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR TWO
21:30:28 DWELLING UNITS.
21:30:29 THERE'S A THIRD UNIT ABOUT THREE FOURTHS OF A THIRD UNIT, SO
21:30:37 THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY IN A RESIDENTIAL 20.
21:30:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S THAT LITTLE JOG TO THE WEST
21:30:46 THERE?
21:30:46 >>DANNY COLLINS: CORRECT.
21:30:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND SO YOU DON'T LOOK AT THE TOTAL
21:30:54 NUMBERS?
21:30:58 YOU ARE JUST LOOKING AT WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED ON THAT LITTLE
21:31:01 SEGMENT?
21:31:02 IS THAT HOW YOU --
21:31:04 >>DANNY COLLINS: WE HAVE A BREAKDOWN, AND THIS IS UNDER THE
21:31:12 SECTION OF THE REPORT THAT KIND OF DESCRIBES IT.
21:31:14 WE BREAK DOWN EACH CATEGORY WITHIN THE SITE AND WHAT CAN BE
21:31:17 CONSIDERED WITHIN THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE.
21:31:20 THERE IS NO PROHIBITION CURRENTLY THAT WOULD ALLOW TO BLEND
21:31:30 RESIDENTIAL 20 SO WE HAVE TO GO BY WHAT'S ALLOWED IN EACH
21:31:33 CATEGORY WITHIN THE SITE.
21:31:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
21:31:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I BELIEVE MR. SHELBY HAD A QUESTION.
21:31:40 RECOGNIZED, SIR.
21:31:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. COLLINS, COULD YOU PLEASE FOR
21:31:42 COUNCIL'S SAKE CLARIFY PROCEDURALLY, YOU SAID THAT THERE
21:31:46 WERE RELATED PLAN AMENDMENT OR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
21:31:49 AMENDMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS?
21:31:52 >> A TEXT AMENDMENT.
21:31:54 STILL FLOATING OUT THERE.
21:31:55 >>DANNY COLLINS: NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REZONING.
21:31:59 HOWEVER, THERE IS A PENDING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE COMP PLAN.
21:32:04 IT WILL BE TRANSMITTED ON JUNE 24th.
21:32:08 AND THEN ADOPTION HEARING IN SEPTEMBER.
21:32:14 THEN IF THERE'S NO PROBLEM GO INTO EFFECT A MONTH AFTER THE
21:32:19 ADOPTION.
21:32:20 IT'S CURRENTLY PENDING.
21:32:23 [~DISTORTION~] IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.
21:32:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND WHAT EFFECT, IF I MAY ASK, HAS
21:32:30 RELEVANCE TO THIS PARTICULAR REZONING?
21:32:32 WHY DO YOU RAISE THAT NOW?
21:32:33 >>DANNY COLLINS: I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT THERE IS AN
21:32:40 UPCOMING AMENDMENT, BLENDING WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
21:32:46 PLANNING DISTRICT ACROSS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
21:32:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION.
21:32:52 UNDERSTOOD.
21:32:55 THANK YOU.
21:32:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:33:01 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:33:03 GOING TO CASE 21-39.
21:33:07 WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE, THE REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME IS
21:33:12 DAVID MECHANIK.
21:33:13 PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 201, 205 AND 207 SOUTH ARMENIA AVENUE
21:33:18 AND 2506 CLEVELAND STREET.
21:33:22 THERE IS A PROPOSED REZONING FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
21:33:24 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO PD, PLANNED
21:33:28 DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
21:33:32 LET ME NOTE HERE ON THE RECORD THREE WAIVERS HERE ARE FROM A
21:33:38 PAST PD.
21:33:39 THIS DOES NOT BELONG TO THIS PD.
21:33:41 THIS BELONGS TO THE 0571.
21:33:45 THE NEW WAIVERS REQUESTED, WE HAVE FOUR HERE FROM NATURAL
21:33:48 RESOURCES AND I KNOW MARY IS GOING TO WANT TO SPEAK ON THAT.
21:33:51 AND THEN ONE FROM PARKING WAIVER, AND THEN ONE GROUND FLOOR
21:33:56 ENTRANCE.
21:34:01 ON THE OVERHEAD SITE PLAN YOU SEE THE ENTRANCES FACING THE
21:34:04 STREET.
21:34:05 HERE ALSO YOU WILL SEE THE PARKING AND THE STRUCTURES.
21:34:15 THE REQUEST HERE FOR THE PD IS TO REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 20
21:34:19 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS.
21:34:22 SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT NOW .78 ACRES OR 33,951 SQUARE FEET,
21:34:28 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST CLEVELAND STREET AND
21:34:31 SOUTH ARMENIA AVENUE.
21:34:34 THE PROJECT PROPOSES CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR, 3-STORY
21:34:38 TOWNHOUSES, RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.
21:34:41 THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THESE BUILDINGS ARE 45 FEET TALL WITH
21:34:46 SETBACKS TO THE SOUTH OF FIVE FEET, WEST OF FIVE FEET, EAST
21:34:52 OF TEN FEET AND NORTH OF TEN FEET.
21:34:56 VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE IS PROPOSED ON WEST CLEVELAND
21:34:58 STREET.
21:35:01 ONE OF THE WAIVERS IS A TOTAL OF 45 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING
21:35:05 FIVE SPACES ARE REQUIRED, AND ONLY 40 SPACES ARE BEING
21:35:10 PROVIDED FOR ACCOMMODATION OF GARAGES AND SURFACE PARKING
21:35:13 HERE.
21:35:16 AS WE SEE THE SITE HERE OVERHEAD VIEW, IT'S OUTLINED IN THE
21:35:21 RED.
21:35:23 YOU WILL SEE WEST KENNEDY ABOVE.
21:35:26 YOU WILL SEE SOUTH ARMENIA TO THE EAST.
21:35:30 YOU WILL SEE SOUTH TAMPANIA TO THE WEST.
21:35:33 AND ALSO YOU WILL SEE PARK CITY WAY DOWN THERE TO THE SOUTH.
21:35:43 THE SITE IN CURRENT STANDING.
21:35:48 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, IT'S THE BUILDING, HOSPITAL
21:35:53 COMMERCIAL.
21:35:54 SOUTH OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL.
21:35:58 AND YOU SEE THE INTERSECTION TO THE EAST OF THE SITE WITH
21:36:01 SOUTH ARMENIA AND WEST CLEVELAND STREET.
21:36:07 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
21:36:10 PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:36:13 APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
21:36:16 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
21:36:18 WAIVERS AN APPLICATION FOR THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED
21:36:22 BY THE APPLICANT BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING.
21:36:25 I BELIEVE CATE WELLS FROM LEGAL AND ALSO NATURAL RESOURCES
21:36:30 HAVE COMMENTS.
21:36:30 THANK YOU.
21:36:31 AND I AM AVAILABLE ALSO.
21:36:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
21:36:34 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU, ZAIN.
21:36:37 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
21:36:38 AND FOR PURPOSES OF TONIGHT'S HEARING CITY COUNCIL IS THE
21:36:43 FINAL INTERPRETER OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:36:45 THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU PROPOSES A TOTAL DENSITY OF 20
21:36:48 DWELLING UNITS TO BE DISTRIBUTED BY A UNIFIED SITE PLAN
21:36:53 CONTROL ZONING LOT.
21:36:54 AND THE STAFF NOTED THE REQUEST IS SUBSTANTIALLY LESS THAN
21:36:59 THE MAXIMUM DENSITY PERMITTED, R-20 AND UMU-60 LAND USE
21:37:04 CATEGORY, AND LESS THAN THE DENSITY APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT
21:37:07 BACK IN 2005.
21:37:10 SUPPORT FOR THE CONCEPT OF BLENDING OF DENSITY CAN BE FOUND
21:37:13 IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:37:16 IN 2013, SECTION 27-12 WAS ADDED TO THE CODE TO ADDRESS
21:37:22 SITUATIONS WHERE A ZONING LOT CONTAINS TWO OR MORE ZONING
21:37:26 DESIGNATIONS WITH DIFFERENT DENSITY REGULATIONS AND
21:37:30 EXPRESSLY ALLOWS THE TOTAL PERMITTED DENSITY TO BE
21:37:33 DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY.
21:37:39 WHEN I SPOKE WITH MR. COLLINS EARLIER TODAY, HE DESCRIBED
21:37:42 THE ISSUE REGARDING DENSITY IN THE R-20 PORTION OF THE
21:37:47 PARCEL AS A TECHNICAL ISSUES YOU AND CONFIRMED THAT THERE IS
21:37:50 A PROVISION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICY 5.1.6, WHICH
21:37:55 ALLOWS THE BLENDING OF DENSITY IN URBAN VILLAGES.
21:37:58 AS MENTIONED THIS EVENING, THERE IS A TEXT AMENDMENT IN
21:38:01 PROCESS THAT SIMILARLY ADDRESSES THE ABILITY TO BLEND
21:38:06 DENSITY IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT.
21:38:09 SO WHILE I RECOLLECT NICE THIS WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE URBAN
21:38:13 VILLAGE AND THE TEXT AMENDMENT HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETELY
21:38:18 PROCESSED. ULTIMATELY, CITY COUNCIL GETS TO MAKE THE FINAL
21:38:21 DECISION ON WHETHER THE APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
21:38:24 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:38:25 I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
21:38:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MRS. WELLS.
21:38:31 CAN SOMEONE ELSE TO SPEAK?
21:38:33 >> I BELIEVE MARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES WANTED TO SPEAK.
21:38:39 MARY?
21:38:40 >> MARY: GOOD EVENING.
21:38:44 MARY DANIELEWICZ BRYSON WITH CITY OF TAMPA NATURAL RESOURCES
21:38:48 HERE TO SPEAK WITH THE GRAND TREE ON THE SITE.
21:38:51 THE GRAND TREE IN 2018 WAS EVALUATED BY DAVE RILEY AND
21:38:57 DETERMINED TO BE CONDITION A WHICH WAS A GOOD CONDITION.
21:39:02 OUR ARBORIST JACKIE HEARTILY REVIEWED THE TREE AND IT'S NOW
21:39:08 RATED C-8.
21:39:10 IT HAS DECLINED.
21:39:13 THE PETITIONER HAS HIRED JOE SAMNIK TO EVALUATE THE TREE AND
21:39:20 HE HAS ALSO CONCLUDED THE TREE IS PROBABLY ABOUT A C-8 AND
21:39:24 IS IN A STATE OF DECLINE.
21:39:31 IT'S TRENCHING, HAS POOR ROOT FLARE.
21:39:35 THERE IS COMMON INDICATIONS OF DECAY WITHIN THE TREE.
21:39:41 AND HE FOUND THAT BASED ON THE DECLINE OF THE TREE, AND THE
21:39:48 DEVELOPMENT OCCURRING AROUND THIS TREE WILL HASTEN THE
21:39:53 DECLINE WHICH I DO AGREE WITH.
21:39:57 SO THERE IS A WAIVER ON THE SITE PLAN IN REGARDS TO REMOVING
21:40:02 A NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREE.
21:40:04 TREES THAT ARE RATED C-89 OR WORSE ARE ALLOWED TO BE REMOVED
21:40:09 WITH JUST NOTICE.
21:40:12 AND THIS TREE IS RATED C-8.
21:40:14 SO THE WAIVER ON THE SITE PLAN IS TO REMOVE A NONHAZARDOUS
21:40:20 GRAND TREE.
21:40:20 IT'S VERY CLOSE TO BEING AT THE LEVEL WHERE THEY COULD
21:40:24 REMOVE IT WITHOUT A WAIVER AND JUST WITH NOTICE.
21:40:39 >> MARY, THANK YOU.
21:40:42 BASED ON ALL OF THAT, I CAN SEE WHERE WE WOULD ALLOW FOR THE
21:40:44 REMOVAL OF THE GRAND.
21:40:46 TWO QUESTIONS.
21:40:46 ONE, IS IT A LIVE OAK OR LAUREL OAK?
21:40:49 AND NUMBER TWO, IS THERE CONTRIBUTION TO THE TREE TRUST FUND
21:40:55 RESULTING FROM THE REMOVAL?
21:40:57 >> MARY BRYSON: YES.
21:40:59 IT IS A STAND LIVE OAK, ALTHOUGH A CC WHICH IS USUALLY
21:41:06 HEARTIER THAN A LAUREL OAK.
21:41:12 IT HAS ASPHALT ALL UP TO THE TRUNK, AND HAS NOT BEEN TAKEN
21:41:18 CARE OF, AND IN A SEVERE STATE OF DECLINE.
21:41:21 YES, THERE IS A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN IN REGARDS TO THE TREE
21:41:29 TRUST.
21:41:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, THANK YOU.
21:41:32 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:41:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
21:41:35 LET'S MOVE ON.
21:41:46 >>DAVID MECHANIK: ARE YOU ALL READY FOR ME?
21:41:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN?
21:41:52 >>DAVID MECHANIK: YES.
21:41:52 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS.
21:41:54 GOOD EVENING.
21:41:56 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
21:41:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MECHANIK, WE HAVE TO GET YOU SWORN IN,
21:42:03 SIR.
21:42:04 >>DAVID MECHANIK: OH, YES.
21:42:05 SORRY.
21:42:05 >>THE CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:42:07 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE
21:42:10 TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
21:42:12 >>DAVID MECHANIK: I DO.
21:42:13 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
21:42:15 >>DAVID MECHANIK: THANK YOU.
21:42:18 MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCIL MEMBERS, I'M HERE, DAVID MECHANIK, ON
21:42:22 BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT ONYX.
21:42:30 WITH ME -- I DON'T THINK HE WAS SWORN IN.
21:42:37 I ALSO HAVE WITH ME GREGORY ROTH, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WITH
21:42:42 BOHLER ENGINEERING.
21:42:48 AND JOE SAMNIK, CERTIFIED ARBORIST.
21:42:54 WE ARE ASKING FOR APPROVAL OF 20 TOWNHOMES.
21:42:57 BEFORE I ASK GREG TO PRESENT THE SITE PLAN AND WALK YOU
21:43:02 AROUND, I MIGHT SUGGEST IN THE STAFF REPORT AS THEY
21:43:12 MENTIONED THE LIST OF WAIVERS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED,
21:43:17 THE PD ON THIS SITE WERE NOT WAIVERS WE ARE REQUESTING.
21:43:24 AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.
21:43:27 THEY WERE LISTED IN THE REPORT, BUT THEY ARE NOT ONES THAT
21:43:31 THEY ARE ASKING.
21:43:36 I THINK MARY DID A VERY GOOD JOB OF CLARIFYING HER REPORT,
21:43:41 AND I APPRECIATE THAT.
21:43:42 BUT REGARDING THE CONSISTENCY, DETERMINATION OR I SHOULD SAY
21:43:49 RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
21:43:53 I THINK CATE DID AN EXCELLENT JOB OF DESCRIBING THE LEGAL
21:44:01 STATUS, AND I THINK I JUST WANT TO UNDERSCORE THE POINT THAT
21:44:09 IT IS WITHIN YOUR DISCRETION TO DETERMINE THAT OUR REQUEST
21:44:15 IS CONSISTENT.
21:44:16 AND I WOULD JUST POINT OUT, WE ARE ASKING FOR 20 UNITS, 20
21:44:21 TOWN HOME UNITS.
21:44:23 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS SITE WOULD ALLOW A TOTAL OF
21:44:28 33 UNITS.
21:44:29 SO WE ARE NOT TRYING TO CRAM EVERY UNIT WE COULD POSSIBLY DO
21:44:37 ONTO THIS PROPERTY.
21:44:52 AND THE PROPOSAL WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
21:44:54 IN THE AREA.
21:44:57 AND AS I JUST MENTIONED IS WELL WITHIN THE DENSITY
21:45:02 LIMITATIONS OF THE SITE AS A WHOLE.
21:45:13 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT WE AGREED TO
21:45:17 THE SITE PLAN THAT WE ARE LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND WE
21:45:25 WILL MAKE -- BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IF COUNCIL
21:45:30 APPROVES THIS APPLICATION ON FIRST READING THIS EVENING.
21:45:39 AT THIS POINT I WOULD ASK GREG ROTH TO TAKE YOU ALL ON A
21:45:43 TOUR OF THE SITE AND SHOW YOU WHAT THE PROJECT WILL BE.
21:45:46 THANK YOU.
21:45:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
21:45:48 IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE THESE GENTLEMEN SPEAK, LET'S GO
21:45:50 AHEAD AND SWEAR THEM ALL AT ONE TIME, MR. MECHANIK.
21:45:52 I SEE ROB YATES, JOE SAMNIK, AND JAKE EGAN.
21:46:07 ALL RIGHT, MR. ROTH, YOU MAY CONTINUE, SIR.
21:46:09 >> GREG ROTH WITH BOHLER ENGINEERING.
21:46:13 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:46:13 I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST CONTROL OF THE SCREEN.
21:46:16 THEN LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN.
21:46:58 HOW ABOUT NOW?
21:47:16 THERE WE GO.
21:47:20 ALL RIGHT.
21:47:25 SO AS MENTIONED, WE ARE LOOKING TO REDEVELOP THE SOUTHWEST
21:47:30 CORNER OF ARMENIA AVENUE AND CLEVELAND STREET, AND TODAY IS
21:47:36 A VACANT LOT.
21:47:37 WE ARE PROPOSING 20 TOWNHOMES, AND AS YOU CAN SEE WE ARE
21:47:42 PROPOSING ACCESS ON CLEVELAND STREET.
21:47:45 WE HAVE COMBINATION OF TWO-CAR GARAGE AND ONE-CAR GARAGE
21:47:50 UNITS THAT ARE ACCESSED BY INTERNALLY, WE HAVE FOUR GUEST
21:47:55 PARKING SPACES ON THE WEST SIDE, AND WE DO HAVE ONE ACCESS
21:48:00 POINT WHICH CLOSING DOWN A DRIVEWAY THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON
21:48:06 ARMENIA TODAY.
21:48:13 THERE IS A TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION
21:48:15 NOW.
21:48:16 AND I'LL RUN THROUGH A COUPLE OF RENDERINGS.
21:48:22 SO THIS IS A LOOK AT THE SITE, ACROSS ARMENIA HERE.
21:48:32 NEXT, AT THE INTERSECTION, STREET VIEW, LAG ACROSS THE
21:48:36 STREET.
21:48:41 >>DAVID MECHANIK: WE ARE NOT SEEING ANYTHING.
21:48:42 >> CAN YOU SEE IT NOW?
21:48:56 >>DAVID MECHANIK: JUST THE SITE PLAN.
21:48:57 >> HOW ABOUT NOW?
21:49:09 >> ALL YOU ARE SEEING IS THE SITE PLAN?
21:49:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR.
21:49:37 >>DAVID MECHANIK: NOTHING IS ON NOW.
21:49:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OFF THE SCREEN NOW.
21:49:43 >> HOW ABOUT NOW?
21:49:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE STILL CAN'T SEE IT.
21:49:57 >> WELL, WE DID TOUCH ON A FEW WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
21:50:12 ONE OF THOSE BEING PARKING REDUCTION WAIVER.
21:50:14 WE DID ORIGINALLY HAVE FIVE GUEST PARKING SPACES.
21:50:19 WE REDUCED THAT TO FOUR IN AN EFFORT TO INCREASE THE GREEN
21:50:23 SPACE ON THE SITE.
21:50:26 WE ALSO, BASED ON -- THERE'S SOME CONVERSATION ON THE
21:50:29 EXISTING GRAND OAK TREE, AND IT BEING IN DECLINING HEALTH
21:50:33 EVEN IF WE MADE AN ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE THE TREE, BASED ON
21:50:36 ITS LOCATION ON THE PARCEL IN RELATION TO ANY PROPOSED
21:50:41 DEVELOPMENT, IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN
21:50:43 THAT, AS YOU REMOVE THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT THAT'S ADJACENT TO
21:50:47 THE TRUNK OF THE TREE CURRENTLY AS WELL AS ANY IN-FILL
21:50:52 DEVELOPMENT AND REGRADING OF THE SITE, IT WOULD BE FURTHER
21:50:55 DECLINE THE TREE.
21:50:56 IN REGARDS TO THE WAIVER TO PAY INTO THE TREE TRUST FUND, IT
21:51:01 IS OUR INTENT TO PLANT AS MANY TREES ON-SITE AS POSSIBLE.
21:51:06 THE INTENT OF THIS WAIVER IS JUST TO PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY
21:51:08 TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENT THAT WE ARE NOT ABLE TO
21:51:11 ACCOMMODATE EVERY TREE THAT NEEDS TO BE MITIGATED.
21:51:16 TO DESIGN THE SITE WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
21:51:21 WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT BACK OVER.
21:51:24 >>DAVID MECHANIK: THANK YOU, GREG.
21:51:25 AT THIS POINT I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADDRESS THE WAIVERS.
21:51:29 THE FIRST WAIVER IS THE CODE REQUIRES THAT THE UNIT STAYS A
21:51:43 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SO REQUESTING THAT SIX UNITS OUT OF THE
21:51:46 20 WOULD NOT FACE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND IF YOU CAN SEE THE
21:51:50 SITE PLAN, OR RECALL WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE, BECAUSE OF THE
21:51:55 CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO HAVE
21:52:01 EVERY UNIT FACE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:52:04 I MEAN, THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISH THAT IS AT
21:52:08 A VERY SHALLOW AND LONG PARCEL THAT RAN ALONG -- AND MOST
21:52:16 PARCELS, RECTANGULAR SQUARE DID NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT.
21:52:23 AND I WOULD POINT OUT, AGAIN, WE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR -- OUT
21:52:32 OF A POSSIBLE 30 TREES SO IT'S NOT AS IF WE ARE TRYING TO
21:52:35 CRAM MORE UNITS ON THIS SITE TO MAXIMIZE DENSITY.
21:52:39 BUT WE DO NEED THE WAIVER FOR THE SIX UNITS.
21:52:47 GREG MENTIONED WE HAVE A PARKING REDUCTION, WHICH IS SMALL,
21:52:51 ONLY 11 -- REDUCTION, AS WELL AS THE REDUCTION OF GREEN
21:52:56 SPACE.
21:53:00 IT'S VERY SMALL.
21:53:01 AND AS YOU HEARD ME SAY BEFORE, ON MANY ZONING APPLICATIONS,
21:53:08 YOUR PARKING AND GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ARE VERY SUBURBAN
21:53:12 IN NATURE, AND WE ARE DEALING WITH URBAN IN-FILL, AND IT'S
21:53:18 VERY HARD TO FIND LAND TO MEET ALL THESE REQUIREMENTS.
21:53:25 AND SO THESE WAIVERS ARE FREQUENTLY NECESSARY IN A PROJECT
21:53:30 OF THIS TYPE.
21:53:32 MY CLIENT JACOB EGAN IS HERE TO SPEAK TO THE PARKING WAIVER
21:53:41 REGARDING THE EXPERIENCE HE'S HAD IN OTHER PROJECTS
21:53:46 REGARDING A SMALL REDUCTION THAT WE ARE MAKING.
21:53:52 WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THAT BRIEFLY?
21:53:54 >> GOOD EVENING.
21:53:56 JUST REALLY QUICKLY.
21:53:58 WE HAVE A PROJECT ABOUT ONE AND A HALF MILES NORTHEAST OF
21:54:02 THIS SITE.
21:54:02 WE HAD TEN SPACE REDUCTION THAT CAME OUT TO ABOUT 13%.
21:54:07 WE ARE BUILT OUT AND HAVE HAD NO ISSUES WITH GUEST PARKING
21:54:11 AT THAT COMMUNITY.
21:54:13 AND THAT'S OUR LOCAL EXPERIENCE.
21:54:16 AND MOST RECENT INTERNS OF A SIMILAR PRODUCT NEARBY.
21:54:22 >>DAVID MECHANIK: OKAY.
21:54:22 THANK YOU.
21:54:23 I THINK MARY'S DISCUSSION OF THE REMOVAL OF THE NONHAZARDOUS
21:54:31 GRAND TREE WAS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO DEMONSTRATE THE NEED TO
21:54:37 REMOVE THIS TREE.
21:54:39 I WOULD JUST EMPHASIZE, AS GREG POINTED OUT, THE TREE IS
21:54:44 LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF A FOOTPRINT OF A BUILDING AND JUST
21:54:49 COULD NOT BE SAVED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT.
21:54:53 BUT AS STATED BY MARY, THE TREE IS IN VERY POOR CONDITION AT
21:55:00 THIS POINT.
21:55:01 AND AS GREG ALSO MENTIONED, WE WILL BE FULLY MITIGATING
21:55:07 IMPACT TO TREES BY PLANTING ON-SITE TO THE EXTENT THAT IS
21:55:11 POSSIBLE, BUT WE DO SEEK THE WAIVER IN THE EVENT THAT WE
21:55:19 CANNOT FIT ALL THE TREES, THE REPLACEMENT TREES ON-SITE, WE
21:55:24 WOULD PAY INTO THE CITY'S TREE BANK.
21:55:27 AND FINALLY, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY, WE ARE NO LONGER
21:55:32 ASKING FOR THE WAIVER -- [~DISTORTION~] AND TREES PRESERVED
21:55:39 ON THIS SITE, THE PERMIT THAT THAT REQUIREMENT WAS NOT
21:55:45 [~DISTORTION~] OF THE PROPERTY.
21:55:46 AT THAT POINT, AT THIS POINT WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
21:55:49 QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE, AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR
21:55:54 APPROVAL.
21:55:55 WE BELIEVE THIS PROJECT WILL BE A WELCOME ADDITION TO THE
21:56:00 AREA, AND AN ASSET.
21:56:05 THANK YOU.
21:56:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
21:56:07 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
21:56:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
21:56:12 GOOD EVENING, MR. MECHANIK.
21:56:14 I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSED, DAVID, BY THE NOTES AROUND THE
21:56:18 PERIPHERY, SPECIFICALLY ON ARMENIA AND CLEVELAND.
21:56:24 SO YOU HAVE GOT 14 UNITS, FIVE UNITS FACING CLEVELAND, AND
21:56:29 ANOTHER NINE ON THE ARMENIA SIDE.
21:56:32 AND VERY SPECIFICALLY, WHAT I AM HOPING YOUR NOTES MAKE
21:56:37 REFERENCE TO IS THE FACT THAT ALL OF THOSE EXTERIOR UNITS
21:56:41 WOULD HAVE GATES, PEDESTRIAN GATES, LEADING TO THE OUTSIDE,
21:56:48 LEADING TO THE SIDEWALK.
21:56:49 BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THIS PROJECT, I THINK, IS WITHIN A BLOCK
21:56:53 OR TWO OF PUBLIX, AND WITHIN TWO OR THREE BLOCKS OF HOWARD
21:56:59 AVENUE, AND I THINK WE SHOULD DO EVERYTHING IN OUR DESIGN TO
21:57:03 ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN USE.
21:57:08 SO THE REASON I AM CONFUSED, BECAUSE IT SAYS OPTIONAL 6-FOOT
21:57:15 HEY MASONRY WALL WITH GATES.
21:57:18 AND THEN IT SAYS PROP, 6-FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL WITH GATES,
21:57:23 AND I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND THAT.
21:57:27 >>DAVID MECHANIK: I AM GOING TO ASK MR. ROTH TO COMMENT ON
21:57:29 THAT.
21:57:30 BUT I WOULD WANT TO JUST POINT OUT THAT ALL OF THE EXTERNAL
21:57:36 UNITS, THE 14 UNITS THAT ARE FACING ARMENIA AND CLEVELAND,
21:57:43 HAVE SIDEWALKS AND WILL HAVE DIRECT CONNECTIONS.
21:57:49 PUBLIC SIDEWALKS.
21:57:50 BUT MR. ROTH, DO YOU WANT TO COMMENT ON THAT?
21:57:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S REALLY MY MOST IMPORTANT CONCERN.
21:57:57 >> CONNECTIVITY DIRECTLY TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:58:02 THE GATES ARE A SURE THING.
21:58:04 THE ONLY -- THAT'S OPTIONAL IS THE MATERIALITY AND THAT'S
21:58:09 WHY A 6-FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL WITH THE GATES, THAT'S WHY
21:58:15 PROPOSITIONAL TEXT IS PUT 234 THERE, BUT -- FROM THE UNITS
21:58:20 TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
21:58:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE THAT LANGUAGE CAN BE TIGHT END UP
21:58:24 A LITTLE BIT, SO THE GATES ARE GOING TO BE THERE.
21:58:27 IT'S JUST A QUESTION OF WHAT YOUR MATERIAL IS ON THE WALLS.
21:58:31 >>DAVID MECHANIK: YES.
21:58:31 WE WILL DO THAT.
21:58:32 ABSOLUTELY.
21:58:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
21:58:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ELSE?
21:58:37 MR. CITRUS, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
21:58:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO: [OFF MICROPHONE] EXCUSE ME.
21:58:42 FOUR PARKING SPACES THAT HAVE THE LETTER C.
21:58:47 I DON'T KNOW IF IT STOOD FOR CHARGING STATIONS?
21:58:50 >> THEY STAND FOR COMPACT.
21:58:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO START A TREND.
21:59:00 I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO START A TREND ON THAT.
21:59:03 NOTHING TO THIS PETITION, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE AND
21:59:07 MORE AND MORE DEVELOPMENT HAVE CHARGING STATIONS.
21:59:10 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
21:59:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
21:59:15 ANYONE ELSE?
21:59:16 ALL RIGHT.
21:59:16 ANYONE ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
21:59:24 ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
21:59:27 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
21:59:28 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
21:59:30 THANK YOU.
21:59:30 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
21:59:34 ITEM.
21:59:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
21:59:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
21:59:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO AND MR. MANISCALCO SECONDS IT.
21:59:42 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:59:43 OPPOSED?
21:59:43 MOTION CARRIED.
21:59:46 MR. CITRO, THANK YOU, SIR.
21:59:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE NUMBER REZ 21-39.
21:59:51 AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
21:59:53 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY IN THE
21:59:56 GENERAL VICINITY OF 201, 205, 207 SOUTH ARMENIA AVENUE AND
22:00:03 2506 WEST CLEVELAND STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
22:00:07 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
22:00:09 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
22:00:12 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
22:00:15 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
22:00:18 DATE, INCLUDING WAIVERS AND REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND
22:00:23 SECOND READING.
22:00:24 AND I WILL GIVE YOU MY REASONING WHY NOW.
22:00:27 COMPLIANCE WITH LAND, DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 21-136,
22:00:32 PROPOSED SITE PLAN CONTROL DISTRICT, PROPOSED USE PROMOTES
22:00:39 THE EFFICIENT AND SUBSTANTIAL USE OF THE LAND AND
22:00:42 INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE WAIVERS AS REQUESTED WILL NOT
22:00:45 SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE
22:00:49 PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
22:00:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
22:00:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. CITRO.
22:00:55 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
22:00:57 ROLL CALL.
22:00:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
22:00:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
22:01:00 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
22:01:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:01:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
22:01:06 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
22:01:07 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
22:01:09 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT
22:01:13 9:30 A.M.
22:01:18 >>DAVID MECHANIK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
22:01:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 10.
22:01:36 >> FILE SU-2-21-02, FOR 3615 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
22:01:44 IT IS FOR A DRIVE-IN WINDOW.
22:01:49 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN, PLEASE?
22:02:01 DANNY, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE CONTROL FIRST?
22:02:04 >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING
22:02:07 COMMISSION -- FIRST SHARE MY SCREEN.
22:02:13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
22:02:14 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
22:02:16 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND
22:02:18 MORE SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE -- [~DISTORTION~]
22:02:27 WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
22:02:28 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD, TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR, SPECIFIC
22:02:33 POLICY DIRECTION, ALLOWED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
22:02:40 LOCATED ON WEST GANDY BOULEVARD AND SOUTH DALE MABRY
22:02:43 BOULEVARD.
22:02:45 SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE.
22:02:51 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES, JUST WEST
22:02:56 OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST GANDY BOULEVARD AND SOUTH PINES
22:02:59 AVENUE, OUTLINED IN THIS PURPLE COLOR.
22:03:02 YOU WILL SEE THE GANDY BOULEVARD IS PREDOMINANTLY
22:03:06 NONRESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.
22:03:09 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
22:03:11 MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER
22:03:15 THE UMU-60 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
22:03:19 AND PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY ANOTHER
22:03:23 RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION.
22:03:27 THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID AN ASSESSMENT OF THE AREA, AND
22:03:31 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH
22:03:34 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS.
22:03:35 THIS REQUEST FOR POLICIES IN PLAN FOR IMPROVING
22:03:39 PEDESTRIAN -- AND THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK.
22:03:44 RUNS ALONG THE SOUTHERN ENTRANCE TO THE GROCERY STORE
22:03:47 WESTERLY.
22:03:48 THIS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION WILL IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN
22:03:54 CONNECTIVITY AND ALSO IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN -- ACCESSIBILITY
22:03:59 WITHIN THE SITE.
22:03:59 PROPOSED DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY, NOT ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
22:04:03 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
22:04:04 APPROPRIATELY SCREENED, WHICH MEETS THE INTENSIVE LAND USE
22:04:08 POLICY --
22:04:11 BASED ON THESE CONVERSATIONS THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS
22:04:13 THE PLAN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
22:04:17 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
22:04:18 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
22:04:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
22:04:22 CITY STAFF.
22:04:23 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CAN I HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN AGAIN?
22:04:30 WONDERFUL.
22:04:32 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION GOING OVER CASE SU-2-21-02.
22:04:36 THE APPLICANT IS SHAGBARK PROPERTIES LLC.
22:04:41 REPRESENTATIVE NAME IS MATTHEW CAMPO.
22:04:44 PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 3615 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
22:04:50 PROPOSING GOING FROM CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO SU-2 WITH A
22:04:54 DRIVE-IN WINDOW. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED WAIVERS.
22:05:00 LAG OVER AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL, YOU WILL SEE
22:05:04 THE CURRENT PARCEL AS RIGHT NOW A PUBLIX.
22:05:10 THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE AREA CONTAINS 7.03 ACRES CURRENTLY
22:05:16 OCCUPIED BY PUBLIX.
22:05:18 PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH HIMES
22:05:21 AND WEST GANDY BOULEVARD.
22:05:25 THE DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE 61,409 SQUARE FEET BUILDING AND
22:05:30 A DRIVE-IN WINDOW LANE, DRIVE-IN WINDOW LANE.
22:05:36 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE FULL ACCESS ON BOTH GANDY
22:05:39 AND ALSO ON HIMES.
22:05:41 THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY CG.
22:05:46 RM 60.
22:05:49 RM-24.
22:05:53 AND CI ZONING.
22:05:55 THE PROPOSED REQUEST REQUIRES 246 PARKING SPACES, AND A
22:06:00 TOTAL OF 220 ARE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME.
22:06:06 AS YOU SEE THE OVERHEAD VIEW.
22:06:13 THE PUBLIX, YOU CAN SEE THE FRONT OF THE PUBLIX.
22:06:18 TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE THE PARKING LOT, ALSO STARBUCK'S DOWN
22:06:22 THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE, AND COMMERCIAL ACROSS THE STREET.
22:06:28 TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE HIMES GOING NORTH AND SOUTH.
22:06:32 AND TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE A TARGET RIGHT ADJACENT TO THE
22:06:37 PUBLIX.
22:06:40 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
22:06:43 PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
22:06:45 APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
22:06:49 SHOULD IT THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
22:06:51 WAIVERS AND APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE
22:06:54 PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND
22:06:56 SECOND READING.
22:06:58 I ALSO KNOW THAT WE HAVE JONATHAN SCAT ON FROM
22:07:02 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING IF HE WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING.
22:07:07 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: I WANTED TO MENTION, JONATHAN SCOTT,
22:07:11 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
22:07:12 WE HAVE COMMENTS FOR THE PETITIONER TO CONSIDER HAVING
22:07:17 VEHICLES COME AROUND TO THE BACK OF THE BUILDING, COME OUT
22:07:20 TO THE FRONT, IN LINE WITH OTHER LOCATIONS THEY HAVE LIKE
22:07:24 RIVER CREST AND RIVERVIEW, JUST FOR EXTRA SAFETY, AND
22:07:31 VEHICLE TRAFFIC AROUND THERE.
22:07:34 I BELIEVE THEY HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THEIR REQUEST.
22:07:41 BUT A LOT OF THE PHARMACIES NOW ARE USING THE DRIVE-INS FOR
22:07:45 MORE THINGS THAN JUST -- THEY DO TESTING AND VACCINES.
22:07:53 SO I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THIS.
22:07:56 BUT I THINK PETITIONER IS GOING TO PRESENT MORE ON THIS
22:08:01 JUSTIFICATION.
22:08:03 THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
22:08:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, JONATHAN.
22:08:07 ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
22:08:09 APPLICANT, HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN, PLEASE?
22:08:11 >>THE CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
22:08:14 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
22:08:16 >> I DO.
22:08:23 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
22:08:26 >> MY NAME IS MICHAEL LEEDS WITH SHAGBARK PROPERTIES, ON
22:08:31 BEHALF OF PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, WHO IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF
22:08:36 THIS PROJECT.
22:08:36 PUBLIX OPERATES A GROCERY STORE, AND THEIR PLANS ARE TO HAVE
22:08:44 BRAND NEW, VERY, VERY NICE NEW STORE AT THE NEW PUBLIX
22:08:49 LIQUORS NEXT TO IT.
22:08:53 AND MATTHEW IS GOING TO TALK ABOUT OUR REQUEST, AND TALK
22:08:57 ABOUT ON THIS PARTICULAR RELATED TO THE DRIVE-THROUGH.
22:09:01 >> WILL YOU SHARE THE SCREEN, PLEASE?
22:09:46 IT'S REALLY THE PRIMARY -- THE WINDOW IS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE
22:09:51 OF THE SPECIAL USE.
22:09:52 BUT PUBLIX, IN WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING FOR THIS SITE, THIS
22:09:53 SITE IS TRULY A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE WHOLE PROJECT.
22:09:57 THEY ARE GOING TO BE ROW DOING PORTIONS OF THE PARKING LOT,
22:10:01 AND ALL NEW LANDSCAPING.
22:10:03 SO THE ENTIRE SHOPPING CENTER.
22:10:07 THE THING WE WANT TO FOCUS ON, THEY REALLY HAVE A SPECIAL
22:10:12 USE IN THE DRIVE-THROUGH.
22:10:14 THERE ARE THREE PRIMARY THINGS WITHIN THE CITY CODE AS
22:10:17 RELATES TO -- AS IT RELATES TO DRIVE-THROUGH.
22:10:20 IT'S THE SPACING TO THE RESIDENTIAL, 122 FEET, TO THE
22:10:27 CLOSEST POINT OF THE DRIVE-THROUGH.
22:10:33 50 FEET.
22:10:34 WE HAVE ABOUT 259 FEET OF STACKING WHICH IS ABOUT 12 PARKING
22:10:39 SPACES.
22:10:39 SO A LOT OF CRITERIA IN THE SPECIAL USE WITH ADEQUATE
22:10:45 STACKING.
22:10:45 THEN ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS IS THE LOCAL ARTERIALS ON
22:10:52 HIMES.
22:10:53 AND THEN THESE ARE THE THREE CRITERIAS THAT I WANT YOU TO
22:10:59 SEE WITHIN THE SITE PLAN, IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
22:11:03 WE HAVE THIS ZOOMED-IN VIEW.
22:11:05 JUST FACING THAT 259 FEET OF QUEUE, WHICH EQUATES TO ABOUT
22:11:11 12 CARS.
22:11:12 WE DID DO A DETAILED STUDY OF FIVE DIFFERENT PUBLIX
22:11:16 LOCATIONS TO ANALYZE THE DRIVE THROUGH, ANALYZE THE NUMBER
22:11:19 OF TRIPS AND WHAT TYPE OF STACKING.
22:11:22 THE AVERAGE STACKING IS ABOUT 75 FEET.
22:11:26 SO THE SITE PROVIDES QUITE A BIT MORE STACKING THAN WHAT IS
22:11:29 REQUIRED OR WHAT IS TYPICAL.
22:11:32 THE OTHER THING WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IS JONATHAN SCOTT
22:11:37 DESCRIBED THE LOCATION, WHICH AND THIS LOCATION AS AN
22:11:43 EXAMPLE WHERE VEHICLES COULD COME FROM THE REAR.
22:11:45 ONE THING FOR THE COURSE OF THIS PROJECT, BECAUSE PUBLIX
22:11:50 DOES NOT PROMOTE OR ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO GO THROUGH THE
22:11:53 LOADING AREAS.
22:11:54 AND THIS PROJECT IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE TYPE OF MEANS
22:11:58 THEY WILL GO TO, TO MAKE SURE THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN.
22:12:01 THIS GRAPHIC DEPICTS THE RED ARROWS WHICH IS THE PATH THAT
22:12:06 PUBLIX WANTS ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT VEHICLES TO TRAVEL
22:12:08 TO GET TO THE LOADING AREA.
22:12:11 THEY ALSO HAVE IN THEIR PARKING LOT -- ALL OF WHICH ARE
22:12:15 DIRECTING VEHICLES TO THE NORTH, AROUND TO THE REAR, AND
22:12:18 THEN BACK TO THE LOADING AREA -- BACK TO THE PHARMACY
22:12:22 DRIVE-THROUGH AND NOT THE LOADING AREA.
22:12:23 SO THEY GO TO GREAT LENGTH TO MAKE SURE THAT HAPPENS.
22:12:27 THAT IS ONE.
22:12:28 REASONS WHY THE STAFF DID MAKE THE SUGGESTION ON THE PROJECT
22:12:34 THAT WE ARE DISCUSSING.
22:12:35 THE DISCUSSION WAS WE WOULD NOT GO FROM THE REAR TO THE
22:12:38 FRONT JUST BECAUSE OF SAFETY.
22:12:39 AND THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THIS CONDITION.
22:12:45 THESE PICTURES SHOW THE SIGN, TYPICAL SIGNS IN THE PARKING
22:12:48 LOT.
22:12:48 THE OTHER ONE SHOWS THE PHARMACY DRIVE-THROUGH, AND THEY
22:12:52 EVEN HAVE A LIT PHARMACY DRIVE-THROUGH SIGN IN THE REAR.
22:12:56 SO THIS IS THE MEASURE THEY'LL GET.
22:12:58 SO WE WANTED TO SHOW YOU SOME OTHER EXAMPLES WHERE PUBLIX
22:13:01 SHOPPING CENTERS HAVE SIMILAR CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE
22:13:04 DRIVE-THROUGH LIKE WE HAVE FOR THIS PROJECT.
22:13:06 SO ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE OF THE PUBLIX, YOU SEE THE
22:13:10 PHARMACY, DRIVE-THROUGH, A SITUATION WHERE IF YOU GO THROUGH
22:13:16 THE DRIVE-THROUGH YOU ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE LANE, A
22:13:21 MANEUVER, CROSSING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.
22:13:24 SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THEY HAVE DONE BEFORE.
22:13:26 THIS IS SIMILAR TO THE ARRANGEMENT THAT WE ARE DEPICTING
22:13:29 WITH OUR PROPOSED PROJECT.
22:13:31 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, VEHICULAR CROSSING AND THEN TOUGH
22:13:36 PHARMACY COMING OUT OF THE MAIN DRIVE.
22:13:38 SO THIS IS A GOOD PATTERN.
22:13:39 WE HAVE ANOTHER EXAMPLE WHICH WE THINK GOES A STEP ABOVE.
22:13:43 THIS IS ACTUALLY THE NEW PUBLIX ON THE WEST OF GANDY
22:13:47 RECENTLY APPROVED.
22:13:49 AND THIS LOCATION ALSO HAD THE SAME GENERAL LOOPING TYPE
22:13:53 CONFIGURATION WHERE A PATRON WOULD COME IN OFF OF THE DRIVE,
22:13:58 LAP AROUND, NEVER GO BEHIND THE STORE.
22:14:01 IN ALL THESE CASES, WE WOULD HAVE THE PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL
22:14:06 DEVICES IN PLACE, CROSSWALKS, SIGN, PARKING AS NECESSARY TO
22:14:12 PROTECT PEDESTRIANS, AS WELL AS VEHICLE APPROPRIATE ROUTE.
22:14:18 NOW I AM GOING TO HAND IT OVER TO MATT TO BE SPEAK ABOUT HIS
22:14:26 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND SPEAK ABOUT THE RESULT AND HOW THEY
22:14:29 SUPPORT.
22:14:31 >> MR. CHAIRMAN?
22:14:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE SECOND.
22:14:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST AS A POINT OF ORDER.
22:14:38 MR. CAMPO, JUST CURIOUS, MR. CHAIRMAN, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY
22:14:41 WAITING DOWNSTAIRS OR ON THE LINE?
22:14:44 >>THE CLERK: NO ONE IS REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
22:14:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: AILEEN, ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
22:14:53 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND
22:14:55 HAVE A WONDERFUL EVENING.
22:14:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CAMPO, I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF YOU
22:15:00 MIGHT WANT TO RESERVE FOR REBUTTAL.
22:15:04 >> YES, WE ARE GOOD FOR REBUTTAL.
22:15:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
22:15:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I GUESS IF THERE WOULD BE ANY QUESTIONS
22:15:18 AT THIS POINT.
22:15:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS AS FAR AS PRESENTATION?
22:15:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY ONLY QUESTION, MR. CAMPO, MY CHILDREN
22:15:30 USED TO FEED THE DUCKS THERE AT THAT LITTLE POND, AND I JUST
22:15:33 WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT DUCKS WILL BE PRESERVED.
22:15:36 >> YES, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE FEEDING THE DUCKS.
22:15:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, NOW IT'S GRANDCHILDREN, BUT
22:15:43 ANYWAY.
22:15:44 ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
22:15:45 >> I WILL PASS THAT ON TO THE GENERATIONS.
22:15:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:15:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
22:15:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED TO CLOSE.
22:15:54 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
22:15:55 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:15:57 ANY OPPOSED?
22:15:59 ALL RIGHT.
22:16:01 MR. MIRANDA, COULD YOU READ IT?
22:16:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR.
22:16:08 ITEM NUMBER 10. FILE SU-2-21-02.
22:16:15 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
22:16:17 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 APPROVING A
22:16:22 DRIVE-IN WINDOW IN CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT IN
22:16:26 THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3615 WEST GANDY BOULEVARD IN THE
22:16:29 CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
22:16:32 SECTION 1 THEREOF PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
22:16:38 I MOVE THIS IN THE FINDINGS OF FACT ARE THAT THE COMPLIANCE
22:16:44 WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE POLICY IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION
22:16:47 STAFF REPORT, AND IS NOT ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
22:16:52 AND IS APPROPRIATE BUFFERED BY SURROUNDING RESIDENCES AND
22:16:55 WOULD CAUSE NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON THESE RESIDENCES, MEANING
22:17:00 AND INTENDING LAND USE POLICY 4.3.4.
22:17:03 IT MEATS THE GENERAL STANDARDS OF 27-129 AND THAT'S
22:17:07 REGARDING THE USE OF LOCATED IN COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING,
22:17:12 DOES NOT REQUEST ANY WAIVERS IN THE GENERAL STANDARD SECTION
22:17:15 27-129.
22:17:18 THE SPECIAL USE CRITERIA 27-132, SPECIAL USE, IS ALLOWED FOR
22:17:23 CONSIDERATION IN GENERAL DISTRICTS WITH SPECIAL USE, OR HAVE
22:17:28 DIRECT MATERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET, SPECIAL USE WILL HAVE
22:17:31 ADJACENT ADEQUATE SPACE FOR VEHICLES, AND THE DRIVERS'
22:17:40 WINDOW ARE AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO
22:17:42 THE NORTH.
22:17:44 WAIVERS ARE NONE.
22:17:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MR. MIRANDA.
22:17:50 MR. DINGFELDER SECONDED IT.
22:17:52 ROLL CALL.
22:17:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:17:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
22:17:56 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
22:17:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES GOOD.
22:17:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
22:18:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
22:18:02 >>THE CLERK: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON
22:18:04 JULY 15th AT 9:30 A.M.
22:18:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
22:18:08 NEW BUSINESS.
22:18:08 MR. VIERA.
22:18:09 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:18:14 YOU KNOW, CAN YOU GIVE ME TWO SECOND?
22:18:19 I HAVE TWO MOTIONS.
22:18:20 MAY I GO AFTER THE NEXT PERSON?
22:18:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO.
22:18:23 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
22:18:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, SIR.
22:18:29 >>BILL CARLSON: NO, SIR.
22:18:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING.
22:18:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, SIR.
22:18:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHILE MR. VIERA IS FINDING HIS PAPER, YOU
22:18:39 KNOW, WE HAVE A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING, I PUT OUT A
22:18:44 MEMORANDUM FOR MONDAY, JUNE 14 AT 9:00 A.M. HERE AT OLD CITY
22:18:49 HALL.
22:18:50 I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THIS MOTION AND HAVE SOMEONE MAKE THE
22:18:54 MOTION SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH A SPECIAL MEETING.
22:18:57 >>LUIS VIERA: VIERA MOVES.
22:18:59 >> SECOND.
22:19:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA MOVED IT.
22:19:02 MR. MIRANDA SECONDS IT.
22:19:03 CONDITION WE GET A ROLL CALL, PLEASE?
22:19:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
22:19:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
22:19:10 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
22:19:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
22:19:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
22:19:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
22:19:15 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
22:19:17 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
22:19:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA, ARE YOU READY, SIR?
22:19:22 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I AM.
22:19:24 I THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP THERE, MR. CHAIRMAN.
22:19:26 JUST REALLY FAST, TOO, IF I MAY.
22:19:29 CONSIDERING THE GOVERNOR'S RECENT TRANSGENDER SPORTS BAN, I
22:19:35 WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO HAVE OUR GOOD FRIEND ADDRESS
22:19:39 US FOR METRO INCLUSIVE HEALTH TO PROVIDE A PRESENTATION TO
22:19:43 CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 24th WORKSHOP FOR FIVE MINUTES
22:19:47 UNDER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY.
22:19:54 >> SECOND.
22:19:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. VIERA.
22:19:56 SECOND BY MR. CITRO.
22:19:59 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:20:00 ANY OPPOSED?
22:20:01 MOTION CARRIED.
22:20:02 >>LUIS VIERA: AND MR. CHAIRMAN, YOU KNOW WHAT, STRIKE THAT.
22:20:08 I MOTION TO PRESENT THE PRESIDENT'S VOLUNTEER SERVICE AWARD
22:20:12 TO EAGLE SCOUT NICHOLAS MICHELINI AT OUR JULY 15th CITY
22:20:16 COUNCIL MEETING.
22:20:18 UNFORTUNATELY, SIR, IF I MAY SAY SO, THAT WOULD BE PRESIDENT
22:20:20 TRUMP, NOT BIDEN, BUT THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
22:20:26 MOTION BY MR. VIERA.
22:20:27 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.
22:20:30 MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
22:20:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WE HAVE JULY 15th?
22:20:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR.
22:20:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM WITH COUNCIL, THE
22:20:40 PRESENTATION OF A COMMENDATION, AND IT'S ALSO A FIVE-MINUTE
22:20:44 PRESENTATION IN HONOR OF DISABILITY AWARENESS DAY, THIS
22:20:49 WOULD BE THE THIRD ITEM.
22:20:50 >>LUIS VIERA: WELL, HOW ABOUT THIS?
22:20:52 HOW ABOUT THIS?
22:20:53 I'LL TABLE THAT, BECAUSE I KNOW WE DON'T WANT TO JAM IT UP.
22:20:56 WE WILL GO BACK AND LOOK AT OTHER DATES.
22:20:58 SO LET ME WITHDRAW THAT IF I MAY.
22:21:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
22:21:03 >>LUIS VIERA: THAT'S IT.
22:21:03 THANK YOU.
22:21:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY MR.
22:21:07 MANISCALCO.
22:21:08 SECONDED.
22:21:10 ALL IN FAVOR?
22:21:11 WE ARE ADJOURNED.
22:21:14 [ MEETING ADJOURNED ]
22:28:22
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.