CITY OF TAMPA EVENING SESSION
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2021, 5:00 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
17:06:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD EVENING, GENTLEMEN.
17:06:20 WE'RE BACK IN SESSION.
17:06:22 TAMPA CITY COUNCIL EVENING SESSION, I'LL CALL TO ORDER
17:06:24 FOR 9/23/21.
17:06:27 ROLL CALL.
17:06:28 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
17:06:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
17:06:32 >> DINGFELDER?
17:06:33 CITRO?
17:06:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
17:06:34 >> VIERA?
17:06:35 MIRANDA?
17:06:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
17:06:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
17:06:38 >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
17:06:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MADAM CLERK.
17:06:41 MR. SHELBY.
17:06:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:06:44 MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
17:06:47 TONIGHT'S QUASI-JUDICIAL AND OTHER LAND USE RELATED
17:06:50 EVENING MEETING IS BEING CONDUCTED WITH A LIVE IN-PERSON
17:06:55 QUORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL PRESENT IN CITY COUNCIL
17:06:58 CHAMBERS.
17:06:59 HOWEVER, IN LIGHT OF CONTINUING COVID-19
17:07:00 GOVERNMENT-ISSUED HEALTH STANDARDS GUIDANCE IN EFFECT,
17:07:04 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE THE ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE
17:07:06 VIRTUALLY THROUGH VIDEO TELECONFERENCING REFERRED TO BY
17:07:08 FLORIDA STATUTES AND RULES AS COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA
17:07:10 TECHNOLOGY, OR CMT.
17:07:12 THE PUBLIC IS ABLE TO WATCH, LISTEN, AND VIEW THIS
17:07:16 MEETING ON SPECTRUM CHANNEL 640, FRONTIER CHANNEL 15, AND
17:07:19 ON THE INTERNET AT TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
17:07:23 NOW, THERE ARE WAYS THAT THE PUBLIC HAS HAD AN
17:07:28 OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ADVANCE THROUGH MAIL OR
17:07:31 E-MAIL IN ADVANCE OF THIS HEARING, WHICH HAVE BEEN
17:07:34 DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL.
17:07:36 PEOPLE WHO ARE WILLING TO OR WISH TO PARTICIPATE VIA
17:07:42 COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY HAVE HAD TO PREREGISTER
17:07:46 IF THEY WISH TO DO SO REMOTELY.
17:07:49 THOSE INSTRUCTIONS ARE AT www.TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
17:08:02 ALSO, THOSE WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY
17:08:06 BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE CMT OR THEY WISH TO COME DOWN TO
17:08:09 CITY COUNCIL, THEY MAY DO SO IN PERSON USING FACILITIES
17:08:11 THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY
17:08:14 OF TAMPA ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF OLD CITY HALL, 315 EAST
17:08:17 KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
17:08:21 PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN
17:08:25 PERSON SHOULD WEAR FACE MASKS INSIDE OLD CITY HALL.
17:08:29 JUST A REMINDER THAT THE WRITTEN COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
17:08:34 DISTRIBUTED AND WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE RECORD AS IF
17:08:42 THOSE COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON.
17:08:44 MR. CHAIRMAN, IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THESE RULES FOR A
17:08:49 VIRTUAL AND A HYBRID MEETING, I'D ASK THAT COUNCIL MAKE A
17:08:52 MOTION TO WAIVE THE RULES TO ADOPT THE RULES AS SET FORTH
17:08:54 IN THE NOTICE.
17:08:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO ADOPT?
17:08:58 >> SO MOVED.
17:08:58 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO HAS MOVED.
17:09:00 MR. CARLSON SECONDED.
17:09:01 ALL IN FAVOR?
17:09:02 ANY OPPOSED?
17:09:02 MOTION CARRIED.
17:09:03 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
17:09:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
17:09:07 ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:09:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: HOUSEKEEPING FIRST, MR. CHAIR.
17:09:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:09:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I SEE MR. MANASSE THERE.
17:09:17 I DON'T KNOW IF HE WISHES TO DO THAT.
17:09:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: CAN WE GET VOLUME, PLEASE, I.T.?
17:09:23 >>RYAN MANASSE: NEED MORE VOLUME?
17:09:25 CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
17:09:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT MIGHT BE ON OUR END.
17:09:31 >>RYAN MANASSE: TEST, TEST, TEST.
17:09:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
17:09:33 WE GOT YOU A LITTLE BIT THERE.
17:09:34 >>RYAN MANASSE: SOUNDS GOOD.
17:09:35 GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE, DEVELOPMENT
17:09:37 COORDINATION.
17:09:38 A FEW ITEMS TO CLEAN UP BEFORE YOU, TRIED TO PUT THEM IN
17:09:41 ORDER SO WE COULD GET THROUGH THEM.
17:09:43 ITEM 2, REZ 21-43, THAT IS NOW WITHDRAWN.
17:09:49 WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE AGENT WITHDRAWING THAT.
17:09:51 SO IF YOU WOULD PLEASE REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA.
17:09:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MOTION TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL TO
17:09:56 REMOVE FROM AGENDA.
17:09:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED IT.
17:09:59 MR. CITRO SECONDED IT.
17:10:00 ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSED.
17:10:02 MOTION CARRIED.
17:10:09 >>RYAN MANASSE: ITEM NUMBER 7, AB2-21-24, THAT WAS A
17:10:16 MISNOTICE AND CANNOT BE HEARD, SO IF YOU WOULD REMOVE
17:10:19 FROM THE AGENDA.
17:10:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO AND MR. MIRANDA.
17:10:21 ALL IN FAVOR?
17:10:22 ANY OPPOSED?
17:10:24 MOTION CARRIED FOR NUMBER 7.
17:10:25 >>RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU, SIR.
17:10:27 ITEM NUMBER 5, AB2-20-11, THIS IS A CONTINUANCE REQUEST
17:10:32 TO 12/9/21.
17:10:34 THIS IS AN ALCOHOL PETITION, AND IT NEEDS AN APPROVED
17:10:37 DE-1 FOR BUFFERING.
17:10:39 I BELIEVE THE AGENT IS ON OR THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,
17:10:43 AS WELL AS THEY NEED TO WAIVE THEIR 180 DAYS TO BE HEARD
17:10:45 IN FRONT OF COUNCIL FOR THIS CONTINUANCE TO BE APPROVED.
17:10:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO APPROVE?
17:10:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: ACTUALLY, CAN WE HEAR FROM THE --
17:10:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
17:10:55 IS THE APPLICANT REGISTERED OR ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
17:11:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: ITEM NUMBER 5, AB2-20-11.
17:11:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HE'S BEEN SWORN?
17:11:19 >> YES, SIR.
17:11:24 >> JOSEPH COMMESSO.
17:11:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU'RE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE?
17:11:31 >> YES, I AM REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE.
17:11:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: TO DECEMBER 9 OF 2021 AT 5:01 P.M., IS
17:11:37 THAT CORRECT, SIR?
17:11:38 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
17:11:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE 180-DAY ISSUE?
17:11:44 I DON'T KNOW WHETHER MS. JOHNSON-VELEZ WANTS TO MAKE
17:11:46 INQUIRY.
17:11:48 WITH REGARD TO THE NEED FOR THE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES
17:11:52 THAT REQUIRE THIS CONTINUANCE, WOULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN
17:11:54 THAT TO COUNCIL.
17:11:55 THERE'S A REASON YOU'RE ASKING FOR THE CONTINUANCE, IS
17:12:05 THAT RIGHT?
17:12:05 >> CORRECT.
17:12:06 WE HAVE TO ADJUST THE PLANS BASED ON NOT GETTING A WAIVER
17:12:12 FOR THIS SETBACK.
17:12:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THERE WAS A DESIGN EXCEPTION,
17:12:16 MR. MANASSE OR MS. JOHNSON.
17:12:18 >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, THAT'S CORRECT.
17:12:20 UNDER AB 2 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SPECIAL USE 2, THEY CAN'T
17:12:24 REQUEST WAIVERS TO BUFFERING AND SCREENING AS THEY WOULD
17:12:26 IN LIKE REZONINGS.
17:12:28 HE'S IN THE PROCESS -- HE WAS IN THE PROCESS FOR THE D 1,
17:12:30 BUT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED IN ITS FORMAT, SO HE NEEDED
17:12:34 TO RESUBMIT TO GET THAT APPROVED THROUGH OUR URBAN DESIGN
17:12:37 SECTION AND THEN RESUBMIT.
17:12:38 THAT'S TO TRY TO KEEP HIM ON TRACK AND ADJUST THE
17:12:41 PLANNING ACCORDINGLY.
17:12:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK WE HEARD PLENTY.
17:12:46 CAN WE MOVE THE ITEM TO CONTINUE TO DECEMBER 9?
17:12:49 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:12:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER IS MOVING IT.
17:12:52 MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.
17:12:54 ALL IN FAVOR?
17:12:55 ANY OPPOSED?
17:12:55 MOTION CARRIED.
17:12:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEFORE WE GO, AND FOR THE RECORD, SIR,
17:13:00 YOU DO WAIVE THE 180 DAY REQUIREMENT, IS THAT CORRECT?
17:13:04 >> CORRECT.
17:13:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
17:13:06 >> THANK YOU.
17:13:07 >>RYAN MANASSE: ITEM NUMBER 12, STEVEN, THE OWNER OF THE
17:13:11 PROPERTY IS EITHER REGISTERED OR THE SECOND FLOOR.
17:13:14 REZ 20-71.
17:13:17 THIS WAS A LATE CONTINUANCE REQUEST.
17:13:18 THEY ARE REQUESTING A 10/28 HEARING.
17:13:21 I'VE LOOKED AT MY CALENDAR, COUNCILMEN, AND I DO HAVE
17:13:24 EIGHT CASES FOR 10/28, SO IT WOULD FIT.
17:13:27 HE WANTS TO MODIFY HIS PLAN TO ADD ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE.
17:13:31 I HAVE MADE IT CLEAR TO THE AGENT THAT THAT DOESN'T IMPLY
17:13:34 THAT COUNCIL IS OKAY WITH SUCH CHANGES AND WOULD APPROVE
17:13:38 THE PETITION, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR FOR
17:13:40 THE RECORD.
17:13:41 BUT HE IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE FOR 10/28.
17:13:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IS THE APPLICANT AVAILABLE ON THE SECOND
17:13:46 FLOOR OR REGISTERED?
17:13:52 >>RYAN MANASSE: I BELIEVE HE'S REGISTERED.
17:13:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ITEM 12, AILEEN.
17:13:58 >>ORLANDO GUDES: RALPH SCHULER.
17:14:00 >> THERE IS NO ONE HERE FOR THIS ITEM.
17:14:02 >> CHAIR, I BELIEVE HE WAS E-MAILING ME JUST BEFORE THE
17:14:05 HEARING.
17:14:05 HE WAS GOING TO BE REGISTERED TO SPEAK.
17:14:07 I DON'T KNOW IF SULING SEES HIM ON THERE.
17:14:11 >>THE CLERK: I'M MOVING STEVEN OVER NOW.
17:14:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN'T HEAR YOU, SIR.
17:14:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: STILL CAN'T HEAR YOU.
17:14:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IF YOU CAN UNMUTE YOURSELF.
17:14:45 >> CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
17:14:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN HEAR YOU NOW.
17:14:48 >> EXCELLENT.
17:14:49 THANK YOU SO MUCH.
17:14:49 MY NAME IS STEVEN ESHKENAZI.
17:14:52 I AM THE OWNER AND APPLICANT FOR REZ 21-71.
17:14:56 I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THE CONTINUANCE AS MR. MANASSE
17:15:00 HAS SUGGESTED.
17:15:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO -- MR. SHELBY, YOU'RE
17:15:08 RECOGNIZED.
17:15:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY: 5:01.
17:15:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO HAS MOVED IT.
17:15:14 SECOND?
17:15:14 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
17:15:16 ALL IN FAVOR?
17:15:16 ANY OPPOSED?
17:15:17 THE MOTION CARRIED.
17:15:18 THANK YOU, SIR.
17:15:22 >>RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU, CHAIR.
17:15:23 ONE LAST ITEM.
17:15:24 IT'S ACTUALLY THREE ITEMS.
17:15:25 ITEM NUMBER 1 IS TA/CPA 21-24.
17:15:31 ITEM 4 IS VAC 21-01, AND ITEM 10 IS REZ 21-62.
17:15:41 JUST TO REFRESH HOW COUNCIL HAS DONE THINGS IN THE PAST,
17:15:41 THESE THREE DO HAVE TO RUN -- WE WOULD LIKE THEM TO RUN
17:15:44 CONCURRENTLY.
17:15:46 WE WOULDN'T MIND THEM RUNNING TOGETHER, BUT YOU'D HAVE TO
17:15:49 VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY.
17:15:50 I BELIEVE THE AGENT FOR THE APPLICATION, DAVE MECHANIK,
17:15:52 HAS REQUESTED THEM BE HEARD TOGETHER.
17:15:54 THAT'S MAYBE TO INCLUDE MORE OF A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
17:15:56 TO REVIEWING THE CPA, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
17:16:01 ALONG WITH THE VACATING AND THE REZONING.
17:16:02 BUT STILL, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE VOTED ON SEPARATELY.
17:16:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM 1, 4 AND 10.
17:16:11 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, SIR.
17:16:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY
17:16:15 COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
17:16:15 I'VE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE IN CONTACT WITH MR.
17:16:19 MECHANIK.
17:16:20 AND, COUNCIL, THERE IS REALLY NO ISSUE TO HAVING THEM
17:16:26 HEARD ALL TOGETHER FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE AND
17:16:30 EFFICIENCY.
17:16:30 TO MOVE UP ITEMS 4 AND 10 TO BE HEARD AFTER NUMBER 1.
17:16:35 AND YOU HAVE IN THE PAST HEARD THE REPORT OF A VACATION
17:16:41 AND A REZONING TOGETHER.
17:16:43 BUT I'M GOING TO REMIND COUNCIL, PARTICULARLY IN THIS
17:16:49 CASE WHERE ITEM NUMBER 1 IS A CHANGE TO THE FUTURE LAND
17:16:54 USE DESIGNATION FOR A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT.
17:16:58 AND I REMIND YOU THAT THOSE ARE LEGISLATIVE MATTERS,
17:17:00 NON-QUASI-JUDICIAL.
17:17:01 A DIFFERENT CRITERIA, DIFFERENT FACTS TO BE APPLIED,
17:17:07 DIFFERENT BURDEN, A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF REVIEW AS
17:17:09 OPPOSED TO A REZONING.
17:17:11 MY RECOMMENDATION, COUNCIL, AND TO THE DEGREE THAT MR.
17:17:14 MECHANIK WISHES TO DISCUSS THOSE ITEMS OR TO RAISE THE
17:17:20 ISSUES RELEVANT FOR A LAND USE CHANGE, MY CONCERN,
17:17:25 COUNCIL, AS WITH ANY CONCERN, ANY CASE WHERE YOU HAVE A
17:17:32 REZONING TRAVELING WITH A LAND USE CHANGE, IS THAT MY
17:17:36 MAIN OBJECTIVE IS THAT YOUR RECORD IS CLEAR AND THERE IS
17:17:41 NO CONFUSION AS TO WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON, WHAT LAW
17:17:43 APPLIES, WHAT THE STANDARD IS, AND WHAT THE CRITERIA IS.
17:17:47 AND WHEN YOU HAVE ALL THESE FACTS MELDED TOGETHER, IT IS
17:17:51 VERY DIFFICULT FOR AN ELECTED BOARD, A LAY BOARD SUCH AS
17:17:54 THIS TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THOSE SEPARATIONS. SO MY
17:17:57 RECOMMENDATION IS TO ADDRESS THE LAND USE ISSUE.
17:18:00 AND WHEN THAT GOES FORWARD, THEN THE ITEMS WILL FOLLOW
17:18:04 CONSEQUENTLY.
17:18:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD AGREE
17:18:10 WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH MR. SHELBY.
17:18:11 I DON'T KNOW IF MS. O'DOWD IS CHIMING IN ON THIS.
17:18:14 BUT I WOULD COMPLETELY AGREE.
17:18:20 I THINK IT GETS MURKY IF WE START HEARING EVIDENCE ABOUT
17:18:25 THE LAND USE AND THEN THE ZONING -- WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON
17:18:32 THIS AND NOW.
17:18:33 I THINK WE SHOULD HEAR THEM CONSECUTIVELY.
17:18:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET ME SAY THIS.
17:18:45 ALTHOUGH 1 AND 4, ITEM NUMBER 10, IT SAYS THE PETITIONER,
17:18:52 THE APPLICANT IS MICHAEL HORNER.
17:18:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH, I SAW THAT, TOO.
17:18:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND I AGREE, MR. MIRANDA, THAT IS THE
17:19:01 CASE, BUT I BELIEVE MR. MECHANIK AND/OR MR. HORNER ARE
17:19:05 GOING TO BE PARTICIPATING ON ALL THREE OF THESE.
17:19:07 I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS THE CASE.
17:19:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DIDN'T KNOW THAT.
17:19:10 ALL RIGHT.
17:19:11 NO PROBLEM.
17:19:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY: ALSO, WITH REGARD TO NUMBER 4, THAT IS
17:19:15 THE VACATION, WHICH IS RELATED TO NUMBER 10 AND, OF
17:19:21 COURSE, NUMBER 10 CAN'T GO FORWARD UNTIL YOU VACATE.
17:19:24 SO THEN A VOTE WOULD HAVE TO BE TAKEN ON NUMBER 4 FIRST
17:19:27 BEFORE YOU VOTE ON NUMBER 10.
17:19:28 THANK YOU.
17:19:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOT OUR WAY THROUGH THAT ONE.
17:19:38 >> MAYBE I COULD HELP CLARIFY.
17:19:42 WE DO NOT DISAGREE WITH YOUR LEGAL COUNSEL.
17:19:45 THIS IS DAVID MECHANIK, FOR THE RECORD.
17:19:48 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF JONATHAN --
17:19:53 >> MR. MECHANIK, WE CAN'T SEE YOU.
17:20:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MECHANIK, JUST ONE SECOND.
17:20:10 MR. MANASSE, HAVE YOU FINISHED?
17:20:13 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, SIR.
17:20:13 THAT'S ALL THE ITEMS.
17:20:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO OPEN ALL ITEMS REMAINING.
17:20:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER OPENED THE HEARINGS.
17:20:19 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
17:20:20 ALL IN FAVOR?
17:20:21 ANY OPPOSED?
17:20:22 WE'RE NOW OPEN.
17:20:23 ALL RIGHT.
17:20:24 ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:20:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DAVID, WE STILL CAN'T SEE YOU.
17:20:28 YOU HAVE TO FIX THAT.
17:20:30 >>DAVID MECHANIK: I'M SORRY.
17:20:32 I'M TRYING TO GET THIS TAKEN CARE OF HERE.
17:20:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHY DON'T YOU GO OUT AND COME BACK IN.
17:20:38 IN THE MEANTIME, STAFF CAN TELL US WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW.
17:20:42 >>DAVID MECHANIK: OKAY.
17:20:42 ALL RIGHT.
17:20:43 THANK YOU.
17:20:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHO IS THE LEAD ON THIS ONE, ITEM NUMBER
17:20:48 1?
17:20:48 DAVID HEY?
17:20:57 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
17:21:00 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:21:02 IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
17:21:05 THANK YOU.
17:21:19 YOU SHOULD BE SEEING THE PowerPoint.
17:21:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE IT, SIR.
17:21:25 >>DAVID HEY: OKAY.
17:21:27 AGAIN, GOOD EVENING.
17:21:28 THIS IS DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:21:30 THE ONE AND ONLY PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THIS EVENING FOR YOUR
17:21:34 FIRST READING AND CONSIDERATION TA/CPA 20-24.
17:21:40 THIS AMENDMENT IS TIED TO THE AUGUST 2020 CYCLE OF PLAN
17:21:50 AMENDMENTS.
17:21:51 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
17:21:59 PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY IT'S IN THE EAST
17:22:02 SIDE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:22:05 YOU CAN SEE IT OVER HERE ON YOUR RIGHT.
17:22:09 THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE CITY, SOUTH OF ADAMO DRIVE.
17:22:13 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:22:20 AGAIN, THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED.
17:22:24 DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH IS THE LEE ROY SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
17:22:27 TO THE SOUTH IS PALM RIVER BYPASS CANAL.
17:22:31 THERE IS SOME S.W.F.W.M.D. PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH AND EAST
17:22:36 OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:22:38 THE SUBJECT SITE ACCESS POINT IS THROUGH EAST WASHINGTON
17:22:42 STREET, WHICH RUNS EAST-WEST.
17:22:45 IT DOES CROSS OVER THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH
17:22:49 LEADS INTO THE UCETA RAIL YARDS TO THE NORTH.
17:22:54 EAST WASHINGTON STREET DOES GO FURTHER OUT AND CONNECTS
17:22:57 TO SOUTH 50th STREET.
17:23:00 THEN YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE ARE SOME SINGLE-FAMILY
17:23:03 DETACHED DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:23:08 SOME WETLANDS, THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THEN THE
17:23:15 EGYPT SHRINE BUILDING IS RIGHT HERE.
17:23:18 THIS IS THE -- THE AERIAL DID NOT CATCH THAT BUILDING.
17:23:22 AND THEN YOU DO HAVE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ALONG
17:23:27 THE NORTH ALONG ADAMO DRIVE.
17:23:32 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALM RIVER, THE BYPASS CANAL, AND
17:23:35 THIS IS ALL UNINCORPORATED COUNTY TO THE SOUTH.
17:23:37 AGAIN, IT'S PRIVATELY INITIATED.
17:23:42 IT'S SMALL SCALE.
17:23:44 CURRENTLY, IT'S APPROXIMATELY 6.04 ACRES.
17:23:49 IF THE VACATING IS APPROVED LATER TONIGHT THAT ACREAGE
17:23:52 WILL INCREASE.
17:23:54 CURRENTLY, THE SITE HAS THAT TRANSITIONAL USE 24 FUTURE
17:23:58 LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:23:59 THAT'S THAT UNIQUE CATEGORY THAT ALLOWS CONSIDERATION FOR
17:24:04 INDUSTRIAL GENERAL USES.
17:24:06 IT ALSO ALLOWS CONSIDERATION FOR THE FULL RANGE OF
17:24:09 COMMERCIAL USES FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO
17:24:11 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, AND ALSO ALLOWS CONSIDERATION OF UP
17:24:15 TO 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
17:24:18 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL 35
17:24:22 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:24:24 WE'LL TAKE A LITTLE TOUR AROUND THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:24:29 HERE WE'RE LOOKING EAST DOWN EAST WASHINGTON STREET
17:24:32 TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:24:34 YOU COULD SEE IT'S ON BOTH SIDES OF EAST WASHINGTON IN
17:24:37 THIS PORTION.
17:24:38 THERE'S WETLANDS BEHIND THESE MANGROVES THERE.
17:24:43 THIS VEGETATION.
17:24:45 HERE WE'RE LOOKING EAST TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE FROM
17:24:51 SOUTH 56th STREET.
17:24:52 SO THIS ALL THAT YOU'RE SEEING HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:24:56 SOUTH 56th STREET IS WHAT THE STREET THE PHOTOGRAPHER
17:25:00 IS STANDING ON.
17:25:01 HERE WE'RE LOOKING NORTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH
17:25:07 56th STREET AND EAST WASHINGTON STREET.
17:25:10 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
17:25:13 SO THIS RIGHT HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE RIGHT.
17:25:16 AND THE LEE ROY SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS BEHIND THESE TREES
17:25:21 AT THE END OF THE ROAD.
17:25:23 HERE WE'RE LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF
17:25:26 SOUTH 56th STREET AND EAST WASHINGTON STREET.
17:25:29 THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF FRAME ON THE RIGHT, THOUGH
17:25:33 BEHIND THE PHOTOGRAPHER.
17:25:34 AND HERE WE'RE LOOKING SOUTH DOWN SOUTH 56th STREET.
17:25:41 THE SUBJECT SITE NOW IS LOCATED ON THE LEFT.
17:25:43 PALM RIVER, THE BYPASS CANAL IS PAST THESE TREES HERE.
17:25:47 AND THEN THIS CURB HERE IS GOING OUT TO EAST WASHINGTON
17:25:52 STREET AND EVENTUALLY OUT TO SOUTH 50th.
17:25:55 HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:26:03 YOU COULD SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTIES TO THE
17:26:05 EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST ARE ALL ON THAT TRANSITIONAL USE
17:26:09 24.
17:26:12 IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY, YOU
17:26:15 HAVE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES, LAND USE CATEGORIES, EXCUSE
17:26:20 ME.
17:26:21 AND THEN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ADAMO DRIVE AND SOUTH
17:26:27 50th STREET, YOU ACTUALLY HAVE SOME REGIONAL MIXED USE
17:26:30 100, WHICH IS THIS PURPLE COLOR.
17:26:32 THEN THIS LINE HERE IS THE CITY BOUNDARY, JURISDICTIONAL
17:26:38 LINE, AND ALL THIS PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH IS THAT
17:26:41 RESIDENTIAL 9, WHICH IS LOCATED IN UNINCORPORATED
17:26:44 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
17:26:44 HERE WE HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, IF THIS AMENDMENT
17:26:51 IS APPROVED.
17:26:53 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HAS CHANGED TO THAT BROWN
17:26:56 COLOR REPRESENTING THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE
17:26:59 CATEGORY.
17:26:59 HERE WE HAVE THE EXISTING AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS.
17:27:07 CURRENTLY, THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 144 UNITS OR
17:27:12 394,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
17:27:17 THE RESIDENTIAL COUNT GOES UP TO 211 UNITS WHILE THE
17:27:24 NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IS REDUCED DOWN TO 157,000.
17:27:28 THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
17:27:31 RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED ON-SITE.
17:27:35 NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE REDUCED.
17:27:38 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, GENERAL, AND INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USES
17:27:40 WOULD NO LONGER BE PERMITTED ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:27:43 THIS NUMBER BASED ON IF THE VACATING IS APPROVED LATER
17:27:47 THIS EVENING, THIS NUMBER WOULD GO UP BASED ON THE NEW
17:27:51 ACREAGE FOR THE EVALUATING NOW BEING ABSORBED INTO THE
17:27:55 SUBJECT SITE.
17:27:56 AS USUAL, WE HAVE SUBMITTED THE REQUEST TO OUR PARTNER
17:28:03 AGENCIES FOR THEIR REVIEW AND INPUT.
17:28:06 ALL OF THESE COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET FOR
17:28:09 YOUR REVIEW.
17:28:10 WE DID RECEIVE AN OBJECTION FROM THE CITY'S PLANNING,
17:28:13 DESIGN, AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION DEPARTMENT.
17:28:15 THE DEPARTMENT CITED CONCERNS ABOUT THE LOCATION IN A
17:28:21 FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND THAT THE LOCATION IS AT THE END OF A
17:28:26 LOCAL DEAD END ROAD AND THAT THE LOCATION, THE SUBJECT
17:28:29 SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:28:33 WE ALSO RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE TAMPA/HILLSBOROUGH
17:28:37 EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY EXPRESSING CONCERNS ABOUT DRAINAGE
17:28:40 ISSUES SINCE THEY ARE AN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER.
17:28:42 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
17:28:49 FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR THE
17:28:53 RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY WOULD BE
17:28:56 INCONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED POLICY GUIDANCE WITHIN YOUR
17:29:00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:29:02 YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND TWO MAIN AREAS OF
17:29:06 INCONSISTENCY.
17:29:06 REGARDING THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, COASTAL
17:29:10 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.1 SEEKS, QUOTE, NO NET INCREASE IN
17:29:15 OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN THE CHHA, UNQUOTE.
17:29:20 THE PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT SEEKS A 45% INCREASE IN
17:29:24 OVERALL MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY FOR THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:29:27 THOUGH PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE NOT PROHIBITED IN THE COASTAL
17:29:32 HIGH HAZARD AREA, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES DISCOURAGE
17:29:36 OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY INCREASES IN THE COASTAL HIGH
17:29:39 HAZARD AREA.
17:29:39 ALSO, THERE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSIONS ON WHETHER THE SUBJECT
17:29:43 SITE FALLS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:29:47 DUE TO THE LARGE AREA OF UPLANDS FOUND ON-SITE.
17:29:50 COASTAL MANAGEMENT POLICY 1.1.3 STATES THAT ISOLATED
17:29:55 AREAS, LIKE THIS SITE, THAT ARE COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY
17:29:59 THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA ARE THEN TO BE CONSIDERED TO
17:30:02 BE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:30:05 BASED ON THIS ANALYSIS, PC STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE
17:30:10 PROPOSED CHANGE IS INCONSISTENT WITH COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
17:30:13 AREA POLICY DIRECTION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:30:16 PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO IDENTIFIED INCONSISTENCIES WITH
17:30:22 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT POLICIES.
17:30:24 THOUGH POLICIES ARE GENERALLY SUPPORTIVE OF RESIDENTIAL
17:30:30 INFILL, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOOKS TO ENCOURAGE INFILL
17:30:34 IN PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AREAS WITH ACCESS TO SERVICE
17:30:37 AMENITIES AND EMPLOYMENT.
17:30:38 THOUGH THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED NEAR EMPLOYMENT AND
17:30:42 TRANSIT, THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE AREA WITH
17:30:45 EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL USES WITH NO
17:30:49 PRESENCE OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.
17:30:52 INFILL DEVELOPMENT IS TO BE MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE TO
17:30:56 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT.
17:30:58 AND THOUGH MULTIFAMILY CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE
17:31:01 EXISTING TRANSITIONAL USE 24 CATEGORY, ADDITIONAL DENSITY
17:31:06 OVER WHAT IS CURRENTLY PERMITTED MAY BE OUT OF SCALE IN
17:31:11 CONTEXT WITH THE ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
17:31:13 SURROUNDING AREA UNDER THE REMAINING TRANSITIONAL USE 24
17:31:19 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
17:31:20 ALSO, ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT SITE IS THROUGH EAST
17:31:25 WASHINGTON STREET, WHICH IS SHOWN IN THE PHOTO.
17:31:27 EAST WASHINGTON STREET IS SUBSTANDARD, LACKING ANY
17:31:30 SIDEWALKS, AND IS PRONE TO FLOODING.
17:31:32 THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO ACCESS THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:31:36 IN GENERAL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VIEWED THIS VERY
17:31:42 SIMILAR TO THE RATTLESNAKE POINT AREA.
17:31:45 IT'S SIMILAR AS IN IT FORMS -- THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY IN
17:31:48 AND OUT OF THIS SUBJECT SITE.
17:31:50 LIKE RATTLESNAKE POINT, THERE'S AN ACTIVE RAIL LINE THAT
17:31:54 GOES INTO UCETA, AND WE'VE ALL BEEN STUCK BEHIND THAT
17:31:59 TRAIN SOMETIMES WHEN IT NEEDS TO BACK UP AND GO IN AND
17:32:02 OUT ON 60 WHICH IS IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH.
17:32:05 THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THAT THE EXISTING
17:32:13 CONSIDERATION OF UP TO 24 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WOULD BE MORE
17:32:16 APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION.
17:32:20 SO BASED ON THAT, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DOES RECOMMEND
17:32:23 TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE
17:32:27 FOUND INCONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND
17:32:30 POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:32:33 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
17:32:37 BOTH MYSELF AND FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA ARE
17:32:41 AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
17:32:42 THANK YOU.
17:32:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
17:32:45 ANY QUESTIONS?
17:32:47 WE'LL MOVE ALONG TO THE APPLICANT.
17:32:58 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, CITY COUNCIL, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
17:33:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR.
17:33:01 THE DEPUTY CLERK SWEAR YOU GUYS IN.
17:33:05 >> THIS IS MICHAEL HORNER.
17:33:08 14502 REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT AND OWNER ON THIS
17:33:11 REQUEST AND THE OTHER REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT.
17:33:14 MR. MECHANIK --
17:33:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: LET'S GET EVERYBODY SWORN IN.
17:33:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THIS NUMBER 1 IS NON-QUASI-JUDICIAL.
17:33:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I APOLOGIZE.
17:33:23 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, NO.
17:33:25 I MADE THE SAME --
17:33:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
17:33:26 YOU MAY CONTINUE, MR. HORNER.
17:33:28 >>MICHAEL HORNER: ALL RIGHT.
17:33:29 THANK YOU.
17:33:29 MR. MECHANIK IS HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH HIS CAMERA.
17:33:33 HE WILL BE JOINING US LATER IN THE PRESENTATION.
17:33:36 I WILL PROCEED.
17:33:37 RESPECTFULLY TO MR. DAVID HEY, WE DISAGREE, AND WE WOULD
17:33:41 PRESENT OUR FINDINGS TO YOU THIS EVENING ON THE CTA.
17:33:45 WE WORKED VERY HARD ON THIS REQUEST.
17:33:47 IF I COULD ELEVATE MR. STANTON FOR A PowerPoint
17:33:51 PRESENTATION, PLEASE.
17:34:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.
17:34:05 >> THANKS, JONATHAN.
17:34:07 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THIS IS PALM RIVER APARTMENTS.
17:34:09 THIS IS OUR PROPOSED CPA, AS MR. HEY MENTIONED, FROM TU
17:34:13 24 TRANSITIONAL USE, TO RES 35.
17:34:16 COUNCIL MEMBERS, JUST SO YOU KNOW, STARTING THIS
17:34:23 PRESENTATION, THIS ENTIRE SITE AND AREA DID NOT EXIST 50
17:34:29 TO 60 YEARS AGO.
17:34:30 THIS IS 100% MAN-MADE.
17:34:33 100% ALTERED SITE.
17:34:36 THE ENTIRE BYPASS CANAL WAS EXCAVATED AND CHANNELIZED
17:34:41 YEARS AGO, AND THE SPOIL BANK AND DEPOSITS FROM THAT
17:34:47 DREDGE ACTIVITY IS WHAT CREATED THIS PROPERTY.
17:34:49 THAT IS WHY THIS PROPERTY IS SO UNIQUE.
17:34:53 THAT IS WHY THIS PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN A FLOOD ZONE.
17:34:57 THAT IS WHY THIS PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH
17:35:00 HAZARD AREA.
17:35:02 THE AERIAL BEFORE YOU IS LOOKING NORTH FROM PALM RIVER.
17:35:06 YOU CAN SEE THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY, WHICH IS ELEVATED ON
17:35:09 THE NORTH SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY.
17:35:11 THOSE TREES YOU'RE LOOKING AT, MOST OF THEM ARE
17:35:15 NON-SPECIES.
17:35:17 THEY ARE EXOTIC SPECIES, CABBAGE TREES, WE'VE HAD TO GO
17:35:22 THROUGH AND CLEAR A NUMBER OF THEM OUT BY YOUR ORDINANCE
17:35:26 AND WILL HAVE TO DO MORE SO SINCE WE HAVE TO COMPLETELY
17:35:29 RE-GRADE AND RECONTOUR, EXCAVATE THIS SITE.
17:35:33 I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THIS IS ALL 100% MAN-MADE,
17:35:38 THEREFORE, WE HAVE NO PRISTINE WETLANDS.
17:35:41 WE HAVE NO PRISTINE VEGETATION, PER SE.
17:35:45 I'LL HAVE MR. PETERIKA LATER IN THE REZONING PRESENTATION
17:35:48 ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES.
17:35:49 YOU'LL SEE THE BUILDING ON THE SOUTHERN PART, LOWER PART
17:35:54 OF YOUR SCREEN, COUNCIL, THAT IS S.W.F.W.M.D.-OWNED
17:35:58 PROPERTY.
17:35:58 THAT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ACCOMMODATING UNDER A LEASE
17:36:02 AGREEMENT WITH VARIOUS HIGH SCHOOLS FOR ROWING
17:36:06 ACTIVITIES, AND YOU CAN SEE A COUPLE OF DOCKS ON THE
17:36:10 SOUTH SIDE AS WELL.
17:36:13 S.W.F.W.M.D. ROADWAY THAT PARALLELS PALM RIVER.
17:36:15 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SELMON EXPRESSWAY, YOU CAN SEE IT
17:36:19 ALL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL.
17:36:20 THAT IS ALL HI IN THE COMP PLAN AND INTENSIVE ZONING AND
17:36:26 DEVELOPED ACCORDINGLY.
17:36:27 THIS IS AN ISLAND UNTO ITSELF BETWEEN THE EXPRESSWAY AND
17:36:32 PALM RIVER.
17:36:33 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:36:36 COUNCIL, THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW THAT'S LOOKING FROM EAST
17:36:42 TO WEST.
17:36:42 SO, AGAIN, PALM RIVER BYPASS CANAL IS TO YOUR LEFT.
17:36:48 SELMON EXPRESSWAY ELEVATED TO THE RIGHT.
17:36:51 YOU CAN SEE THE DIRECT CONNECTION, EXPRESSWAY ALL THE WAY
17:36:54 TO THE TAMPA CBD IN THE BACKGROUND.
17:36:58 YOU CAN SEE THE BRIDGE CROSSING, WHICH IS THE FIRST
17:37:00 CROSSING ON THE LEFT.
17:37:01 THEN THE SECOND CROSSING IS 50th STREET, U.S. 41.
17:37:06 AGAIN, THE S.W.F.W.M.D. PROPERTY IS ON THE LEFT SIDE WITH
17:37:11 THEIR ACCESS ROAD, THE VEGETATION AGAIN IS PRETTY MUCH
17:37:14 ALL EXOTIC AND NUISANCE SPECIES.
17:37:16 YOU CAN SEE THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
17:37:21 IT'S INTERESTING, COUNCIL, THAT THAT EXPRESSWAY IS
17:37:23 ELEVATED TO ABOUT 40 FEET, AND THAT IS, IF YOU CLIMB ON
17:37:28 THE SPOIL BANKS ON THIS PROPERTY, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE
17:37:32 ALMOST AT EYE LEVEL THE TOP LANES OF THAT SELMON
17:37:37 EXPRESSWAY.
17:37:38 SO WE HAVE RANGING FROM 20, 30, AND 40 FEET ON THIS SITE
17:37:43 BASED ON THE SPOIL BANK ACTIVITIES AND THE DREDGING OF
17:37:45 THE BYPASS CANAL.
17:37:47 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:37:48 COUNCIL, AGAIN, A LITTLE CLOSER UP, YOU CAN SEE THE
17:37:55 56th STREET.
17:37:58 TO THE WEST, GO TO THE LEFT, THAT AGAIN IS GOING TO STAY.
17:38:04 WE WILL BE IMPROVING 56th STREET -- EXCUSE ME,
17:38:08 WASHINGTON STREET.
17:38:09 YOU CAN SEE EXPRESSWAY BEHIND ON THE NORTH SIDE.
17:38:12 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:38:14 THIS IS WASHINGTON STREET.
17:38:18 MR. HEY HAD A SIMILAR SLIDE.
17:38:20 THERE'S NO QUESTION, COUNCIL, IT IS SUBSTANDARD.
17:38:23 IT DOES NOT MEET CURRENT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION.
17:38:26 IT DOES NOT HAVE SIDEWALKS.
17:38:28 IT DOES NOT HAVE DRAINAGE FACILITIES.
17:38:30 OUR CLIENT IS GOING TO HAVE TO IMPROVE THIS TO CITY
17:38:34 STANDARDS.
17:38:35 AND WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT IN THE REZONING STAGE, BUT
17:38:38 THIS IMPROVEMENT IS GOING TO COST A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT.
17:38:42 OUR CLIENT HAS TO ABSORB THOSE COSTS INTO DEVELOPMENT
17:38:46 PROFILE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
17:38:48 THAT IS WHY WE ARE SEEKING A RES 35.
17:38:52 TU 24 IS THE ENTIRE SECTION OF THIS ISLAND.
17:38:56 IT'S UNIFORM.
17:38:56 IT ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY.
17:38:57 IT ALSO ALLOWS UP TO 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL,
17:39:01 AS MR. HEY.
17:39:04 WE ARE SEEKING ONLY RESIDENTIAL USES ON THIS RES 35 COMP
17:39:08 PLAN AMENDMENT.
17:39:09 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:39:10 SO, AGAIN, COUNCIL, AN AERIAL VIEW LOOKING DIRECTLY ON
17:39:18 TOP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:39:20 THERE ARE TWO PARCELS THAT WERE SEPARATED BY AN
17:39:23 INTERVENING RIGHT-OF-WAY.
17:39:24 THAT INTERVENING RIGHT-OF-WAY IS THE SUBJECT OF THE
17:39:29 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION THAT WILL BE FOLLOWING THIS
17:39:36 PRESENTATION.
17:39:37 YOU WILL SEE THE SOUTH SIDE.
17:39:40 YOU CAN SEE THE S.W.F.W.M.D. PROPERTY AGAIN.
17:39:43 ON THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, THAT IS A
17:39:47 THREE AND A HALF ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY MICHAEL AND
17:39:51 MARTHA JUNCO.
17:39:52 I SENT ALL OF YOU AND THE CLERK'S OFFICE A COPY OF THEIR
17:39:58 SUPPORTIVE E-MAIL.
17:39:59 I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THE TIME TO READ IT.
17:40:00 I HOPE YOU DID.
17:40:01 TO PARAPHRASE, THEY ESSENTIALLY POINTED OUT THEY HAVE NO
17:40:05 INFRASTRUCTURE.
17:40:05 THEY HAVE NO PUBLIC UTILITIES.
17:40:07 THEY HAVE NO CABLE.
17:40:08 THEY HAVE NO STREETLIGHTS.
17:40:09 THEY HAVE NO SIDEWALKS.
17:40:11 THEY ALREADY ZONED FOR MULTIFAMILY, AND THEY BELIEVE THIS
17:40:14 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AND PROPOSED PD ZONING LATER IS AN
17:40:18 APPROPRIATE USE FOR THIS PROPERTY.
17:40:20 THE PARCELS TO THE NORTH OF WASHINGTON STREET, I BELIEVE
17:40:27 ONE OF THEM IS A BEEKEEPER.
17:40:30 AT THE PRIOR CPA PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING
17:40:34 COMMISSION, THEY WERE NOT IN OBJECTION.
17:40:36 I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE ON TONIGHT.
17:40:37 THEY SIMPLY INDICATED THEY HAVE NO INFRASTRUCTURE AS
17:40:40 WELL.
17:40:41 VERY CONCERNED ABOUT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.
17:40:43 VERY CONCERNED ABOUT HOW THAT IS GOING TO BE ADDRESSED
17:40:47 AND INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE FINAL PLANS
17:40:50 AND HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGE TO RES 35.
17:40:54 STAY ON THAT SLIDE, JONATHAN.
17:40:57 PUT IT BACK, PLEASE.
17:40:59 COUNCIL, IT'S IMPORTANT TO SEE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THIS
17:41:03 PROPERTY, YOU'LL SEE ALMOST A GREEN CONTINUOUS STRIP THAT
17:41:11 PARALLELS 56th STREET.
17:41:12 THAT IS A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT CANAL THAT WAS
17:41:18 MAN-MADE AND CONSTRUCTED BY THE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY YEARS
17:41:23 AGO WHEN THEY EXCAVATED THE BYPASS CANAL AND BUILT THE
17:41:27 SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
17:41:29 THAT IS HOW THEY CONVEYED STORMWATER DRAINAGE ACROSS THIS
17:41:33 PROPERTY INTO THE TAMPA BAY BYPASS CANAL.
17:41:35 SO, YES, THERE ARE SOME WETLANDS THERE.
17:41:38 YES, IT HAS A LOWER ELEVATION BECAUSE IT TAKES WATER FROM
17:41:42 THE EXPRESSWAY, AND OUR PROJECT DOES NOT IMPACT THAT
17:41:46 PARCEL AT ALL.
17:41:47 AND THAT'S WHY WE HAVE MADE VERY CLEAR THE TURNPIKE
17:41:50 AUTHORITY THAT WE HAVE NO IMPACTS ONTO THEIR PERMANENT
17:41:54 DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
17:41:55 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:41:59 [ENCODER DROP]
17:42:11 -- WE HAVE IG AS WELL AND FURTHER WEST COMMERCIAL, LARGE
17:42:29 BLOCK OF RED.
17:42:29 YOU CAN SEE IMMEDIATELY TO OUR SOUTHWEST WE HAVE RM-24.
17:42:34 HIGHER DENSITY MULTIFAMILY DISTRICTS.
17:42:39 COUNCIL, THIS GRAPHIC HERE, I APOLOGIZE, BUT I WANTED TO
17:42:48 SHOW THIS BECAUSE THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:42:52 YOU CAN SEE WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ISLAND OF TU 24,
17:42:56 WHICH ALLOWS SIGNIFICANT COMMERCIAL --
17:43:01 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. HORNER, JUST ONE QUESTION.
17:43:03 AS I'M LOOKING AT THE MAP.
17:43:04 I SEE SEVEN PARCELS OF PROPERTY THAT ARE CONTIGUOUS WITH
17:43:08 THAT LAND.
17:43:10 DO THEY HAVE PROPERTY INTO THE -- INTO PALM RIVER CANAL?
17:43:16 FROM WHAT I SEE HERE, THEY DO.
17:43:19 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THOSE ARE S.W.F.W.M.D. PARCELS, MR.
17:43:21 MIRANDA, SO THEY DO HAVE OWNERSHIP INTO THE BYPASS CANAL.
17:43:25 WE, OF COURSE, DO NOT, BUT THE S.W.F.W.M.D. PROPERTIES DO
17:43:28 EXTEND.
17:43:29 YOU CAN SEE THE RMU 100, COUNCIL MEMBERS, THAT MR. HEY
17:43:36 WAS REFERENCING.
17:43:37 THAT IS A VERY INTENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY, AND THEN PERHAPS
17:43:43 IT'S IMPORTANT, YOU'LL SEE THAT PINK CMU 35, WHICH IS
17:43:47 JUST NORTH OF THE RIVER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RIVER,
17:43:50 SOUTH OF WASHINGTON STREET.
17:43:53 THAT IS, DAVID MENTIONED, THE SHRINERS TEMPLE
17:43:57 HEADQUARTERS.
17:43:57 THAT CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS WAS JUST RECENTLY
17:44:00 CONSTRUCTED.
17:44:00 I THINK A COUPLE OF YOU MAY HAVE EVEN JOINED THEIR
17:44:04 FESTIVITIES FOR THEIR GRAND OPENING SOME MONTHS AGO.
17:44:09 BEAUTIFUL BUILDING.
17:44:10 TWO STORIES, 36,000 SQUARE FEET.
17:44:12 THAT CMU 35 IS RIGHT SMACK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE COASTAL
17:44:16 HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:44:17 THAT PLAN AMENDMENT TO CMU 35 WAS APPROVED BY THE
17:44:21 PLANNING COMMISSION AND TAMPA CITY COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY.
17:44:24 THEIR ZONING IS CI.
17:44:26 YOU DID NOT SEE THIS AS A 2D.
17:44:29 BUT THAT TWO STORY CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING IS THERE
17:44:32 NOW.
17:44:32 WE'RE HAPPY THEY ARE THERE.
17:44:33 THE ONLY IMPROVEMENTS THEY MADE WAS A DRIVEWAY APRON TO
17:44:37 WASHINGTON STREET.
17:44:38 UNLIKE OUR CLIENT THAT WILL HAVE TO IMPROVE WASHINGTON
17:44:41 STREET IN ITS ENTIRETY.
17:44:43 NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
17:44:44 COUNCIL, THIS IS THE NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD FEMA MAP.
17:44:52 THIS IS THE FLOOD ZONE.
17:44:54 YOU CAN SEE THAT VIRTUALLY ALL OF THIS PROPERTY, UNLIKE
17:44:59 THE ABUTTING PROPERTY, WEST, NORTHWEST, NORTHEAST, SOUTH,
17:45:04 IT IS OUTSIDE OF THE FLOOD ZONE.
17:45:07 THAT MEANS THAT OWNERS, BUYERS, RENTERS WILL NOT HAVE TO
17:45:12 OBTAIN FLOOD INSURANCE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
17:45:15 WHY IS THAT?
17:45:16 THAT IS BECAUSE THIS IS 100% MAN-MADE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
17:45:23 THAT WAS USED FOR THE BYPASS EXCAVATION AND THAT IS ALL
17:45:27 SPOIL BANK AND EXCAVATED DIRT PILES.
17:45:30 THOSE ELEVATIONS, AGAIN, 20, 30, 35, 40 FEET HIGH.
17:45:35 THAT IS WHY YOU GO, HOW CAN THAT BE WHEN YOU'RE
17:45:39 SURROUNDED BY COASTAL HIGH HAZARD?
17:45:43 BECAUSE ALL OF THE FILL FROM THE EXCAVATION, DREDGE
17:45:46 ACTIVITIES WAS LAID ON TOP OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH USED
17:45:51 TO BE WATER AND THEREFORE IS NOT WITHIN THE FLOOD ZONE.
17:45:55 THAT'S IMPORTANT.
17:45:59 IT'S A LITTLE LAND CANAL, WE'LL SEE ON THE WEST, THAT
17:46:02 LITTLE SLIVER OF GREEN.
17:46:06 THAT IS THE EXISTING CANAL THAT THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY
17:46:11 CONSTRUCTED TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A PERMANENT DRAINAGE
17:46:13 EASEMENT CONVEYANCE FOR THEIR STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE
17:46:18 EXPRESSWAY BYPASS CANAL.
17:46:20 AGAIN, WE HAVE NO IMPACT ON THAT.
17:46:22 NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
17:46:23 AGAIN, HERE IS THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD MAP.
17:46:31 COUNCIL, AGAIN, YOU'RE WONDERING WHY IS EVERYTHING --
17:46:35 WHEN WE LOOK AT THAT MAP, NORTH, NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST,
17:46:39 WEST, SOUTHWEST, ALL THE WAY ACROSS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,
17:46:43 THE RIVER, IT IS THE ONLY PARCEL THAT IS NOT IN THE
17:46:47 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:46:48 AGAIN, WHY IS THAT?
17:46:49 BECAUSE THIS HAS CONTOUR ELEVATIONS OF 20, 30, 40 FEET
17:46:55 ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, AND THIS PROPERTY IS NOT EXPOSED TO
17:46:59 THOSE FLOODING CONDITIONS.
17:47:01 WE HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO.
17:47:03 WE HAVE TO EXCAVATE, RECONTOUR, GRADE, MAKE OUR DRAINAGE
17:47:07 WORK.
17:47:08 SO A LOT OF THOSE PILES HAVE TO BE DROPPED AND REFILL
17:47:11 BROUGHT IN, OLD FILL TAKEN OUT.
17:47:14 IT'S NOT GOING TO TOLERATE DEVELOPMENT LOADS, BUT THIS
17:47:17 PROPERTY, FOR THE MOST PART, IS OUTSIDE OF THE COASTAL
17:47:20 HIGH HAZARD AREA, UNLIKE THE TEMPLE SHRINERS CORPORATE
17:47:24 HEADQUARTERS WHICH IS 100% WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
17:47:28 AREA AND FLOOD ZONE.
17:47:29 ONCE AGAIN, THAT SMALL COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA ON THE
17:47:33 WEST SIDE, THAT IS THE AREA THAT THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY
17:47:36 USES FOR THEIR PERMANENT EASEMENT.
17:47:39 THAT'S THEIR CANAL.
17:47:41 THAT'S THEIR DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE FACILITY.
17:47:43 AGAIN, WE HAVE NO IMPACT ON THAT.
17:47:45 NEXT SLIDE, JONATHAN, PLEASE.
17:47:49 RES 35 DOES ALLOW AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
17:47:53 THAT'S NOT REALLY PART OF THE CPA.
17:47:55 I'LL LET YOU KNOW THAT RES 35 DOES ALLOW THAT
17:47:57 CONSIDERATION.
17:47:58 NEXT SLIDE.
17:47:58 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
17:48:04 SO, COUNCIL, I'M GOING TO CLOSE ON THIS.
17:48:08 THIS IS AN ARTICLE THAT APPEARED SOME MONTHS AGO IN THE
17:48:14 TAMPA BAY TIMES.
17:48:20 IT IS A RESPONSE TO PRESSURES OF DEVELOPING IN THE
17:48:23 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA IN PINELLAS COUNTY, PARTICULARLY
17:48:26 IN THE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG.
17:48:27 AND WHAT THEY DID BECAUSE WE ALL EXPERIENCED, WE BEING
17:48:33 MUNICIPALITIES, ALL EXPERIENCED THOSE SAME DEVELOPMENT
17:48:37 PRESSURES.
17:48:37 AND WHAT THEY FOUND THAT WHEN THEY MAPPED THEIR COASTAL
17:48:41 HIGH HAZARD AREA, PRIOR TO THE FEMA MAPS BEING AMENDED,
17:48:47 THAT APPROXIMATELY 20% OF THEIR INCORPORATED CITY OF
17:48:51 ST. PETERSBURG'S PROPERTY WAS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
17:48:54 AREA.
17:48:55 NOT A HIGH PERCENTAGE, ONE THAT THEY HAVE DEALT WITH ON A
17:48:59 PIECEMEAL BASIS AND THEY ALSO HAVE RESTRICTIONS IN PLACE.
17:49:02 THE FEMA MAPS AND THE FLOOD MAPS WERE RECENTLY ADOPTED
17:49:06 ABOUT NINE, TEN MONTHS AGO.
17:49:08 AND THAT RESULTED IN THOSE CHH DESIGNATED AREAS
17:49:12 INCREASING TO APPROXIMATELY 40%.
17:49:14 THAT'S ALMOST HALF OF THE ENTIRE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG.
17:49:20 AND WHAT THEY REALIZED, AND THEIR DESIGNATED
17:49:25 REPRESENTATIVES, THEY REALIZED THAT THEY COULD NOT
17:49:31 PRECLUDE IN ONE FELL SWOOP ALL THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
17:49:35 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OR THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE A CITY
17:49:37 THAT WOULD GROW.
17:49:38 I'LL FINISH.
17:49:39 THAT SAME PRESSURE APPLIES IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, AND I
17:49:44 THINK THAT'S WHY IT'S IMPORTANT TO ALLOW FOR SENSITIVE,
17:49:48 PRACTICAL, PRAGMATIC DECISIONS WHERE NOT EVERY
17:49:51 DEVELOPMENT IS APPROVED, NOT EVERY DEVELOPMENT IS DENIED.
17:49:54 THE REASON WE'RE SEEKING THIS DENSITY, COUNCIL, IS WE
17:49:57 HAVE VERY EXPENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS.
17:50:00 THIS SITE IS AN IDEAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ACCOMMODATING A
17:50:03 MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IS
17:50:06 ALREADY APPROVED, AND WE FEEL IT'S AN APPROPRIATE REQUEST
17:50:11 BEFORE YOU.
17:50:12 HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
17:50:13 THANK YOU.
17:50:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
17:50:15 ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANYONE?
17:50:17 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
17:50:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M NOT SURE HAD TO ASK THIS TO.
17:50:25 MAYBE DAVID.
17:50:26 DAVID HEY, ARE YOU STILL THERE?
17:50:28 THERE YOU ARE.
17:50:28 SO WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCY IN THE FACTS AS
17:50:34 THEY'VE BEEN EXPLAINED TO US.
17:50:37 DAVID, IF I RECALL, I THINK YOU SAID ALL OR MOST OF THIS
17:50:41 PROPERTY IS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:50:44 THE PETITIONER IS SAYING IT'S NOT.
17:50:49 SO I'LL START WITH YOU, DAVID, TO EXPLAIN THAT
17:50:53 DISCREPANCY, AND THEN I'LL PROBABLY JUMP OVER TO MICHAEL
17:50:58 FOR HIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISCREPANCY.
17:50:59 THIS CAN'T BE NEWS TO EITHER ONE OF YOU.
17:51:07 >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN.
17:51:10 AGAIN, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:51:12 I WILL DIRECT YOU ALL TO PAGE 5 WITHIN THE PLANNING
17:51:16 COMMISSION REPORT, MORE SPECIFICALLY COASTAL MANAGEMENT
17:51:20 POLICY 1.1.3.
17:51:23 AND I'LL READ IT.
17:51:24 IT BASICALLY SAYS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY FOR PURPOSES
17:51:28 OF EVALUATING PLAN AMENDMENTS AND REZONINGS.
17:51:32 THE FIRST BULLET SAYS IF 50% OR MORE OF A PARCEL OF LAND
17:51:35 IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, THEN THE
17:51:39 ENTIRE PARCEL SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN THE COASTAL HIGH
17:51:41 HAZARD AREA.
17:51:42 THIS SITE, IT DOESN'T EQUAL UP TO 50%, SO IT DOESN'T
17:51:46 QUALIFY UNDER THAT.
17:51:47 BUT I WILL DIRECT TO YOU THE SECOND BULLET.
17:51:51 IT DOES SAY ISOLATED AREAS THAT ARE DEFINED BY THE SLOSH
17:51:58 MODEL TO BE AT HIGHER ELEVATIONS AND ARE SURROUNDED BY
17:52:02 THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OR BY THE CHHA AND A BODY OF
17:52:08 WATER SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
17:52:11 AREA.
17:52:12 THAT'S A VERY DIRECT POLICY.
17:52:22 THAT'S ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW IS NOT THE COASTAL HIGH
17:52:24 HAZARD AREA.
17:52:26 THAT'S THE NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD MAP.
17:52:27 I WOULD DIRECT WHOEVER IS CONTROLLING THAT TO SHOW THE
17:52:32 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA MAP.
17:52:34 THERE WE GO.
17:52:34 THAT, AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S SURROUNDED BY THAT SLASHED
17:52:39 GREEN LINE, AND IT CREATES AN ISLAND RIGHT THERE.
17:52:46 AND, AGAIN, THE ONLY ACCESS POINT IS OUT TO EAST
17:52:51 WASHINGTON, WHICH IS WHOLLY WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH
17:52:53 HAZARD AREA.
17:52:54 SO THE SUBJECT SITE, BASED ON THE POLICY IS DEEMED TO BE
17:52:58 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
17:53:02 HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION.
17:53:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE OTHER QUESTION ALONG THAT LINE,
17:53:08 AND I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO THE ZONING PART OF THIS
17:53:13 BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE HYPOCRITICAL ON MY PART, BUT IF THE
17:53:20 ONLY -- IF THE EGRESS AND INGRESS IS ALONG THAT
17:53:22 WASHINGTON STREET AND THE DEVELOPER ALREADY KNOWS THEY
17:53:26 HAVE TO REBUILD THAT STREET FOR ANY PURPOSES, IS IT
17:53:38 POSSIBLE, DAVID THAT THEY MITIGATE CHHA ISSUE, THE ISLAND
17:53:46 ISSUE, FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM, CAN THEY MITIGATE IT BY
17:53:49 ELEVATING THAT STREET SO REGARDLESS OF THE SURROUNDING
17:53:56 AREA GOES UNDER, THEY CAN GET IN AND OUT ON A HIGH
17:53:59 STREET?
17:54:00 HAS ANYBODY TALKED ABOUT THAT, LOOKED AT THAT OR ANYTHING
17:54:02 FROM A PLANNER PERSPECTIVE?
17:54:04 OR IS THAT OUTSIDE OF THE REALM OF YOUR INVESTIGATION,
17:54:09 DAVID HEY?
17:54:11 >>DAVID HEY: THAT, FOR US, IS NOT A PLAN AMENDMENT
17:54:16 QUESTION.
17:54:16 THAT'S MORE DIRECTED TOWARD THE ZONING.
17:54:20 I WILL SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
17:54:26 INCONSISTENT FINDING IS NOT ONLY ON THAT SOLE ACCESS
17:54:30 POINT, BUT A NUMBER OF ISSUES REGARDING -- ALREADY
17:54:37 CONSIDERED FOR MULTIFAMILY AND THAT UP TO 24 DWELLING
17:54:41 UNITS.
17:54:41 OVERALL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THAT THE 24
17:54:44 DWELLING UNITS THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED CURRENTLY IS MORE
17:54:47 APPROPRIATE IN THAT AREA BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
17:54:55 AND THE SURROUNDING PARCELS.
17:54:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
17:55:00 >>DAVID HEY: I WOULD ALSO, SINCE THE APPLICANT BROUGHT UP
17:55:03 THE EGYPT SHRINE, THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 PLAN
17:55:09 AMENDMENT FURTHER TO THE WEST, I WILL JUST PUT IN THE
17:55:12 RECORD THAT THAT WAS UNDER A DIFFERENT COMP PLAN DEALING
17:55:16 WITH DIFFERENT COASTAL HIGH HAZARD LINES AND POLICIES.
17:55:21 YES, THE COASTAL -- THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 WAS
17:55:28 APPROVED BACK IN 2006, BUT WE'RE UNDER A DIFFERENT COMP
17:55:34 PLAN NOW AND DIFFERENT COASTAL HIGH HAZARD BOUNDARIES.
17:55:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE WITH ANY QUESTIONS?
17:55:47 >>MICHAEL HORNER: MR. CHAIRMAN, MAY I RESPOND?
17:55:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR, YOU CAN RESPOND.
17:55:52 >>MICHAEL HORNER: JUST BRIEFLY.
17:55:53 AGAIN, MICHAEL HORNER.
17:55:54 I APPRECIATE MR. HEY'S COMMENTS ON THIS.
17:55:57 WE'VE HAD THIS DISCUSSION AND DIALOGUE PRIOR.
17:56:01 I THINK OUR POINT IS THIS IS AN ISOLATED PARCEL THAT IS
17:56:05 ISOLATED BY THE EXPRESSWAY, PALM RIVER BYPASS.
17:56:09 THE PROPERTY OWNER VERY LIMITED TWO HOMES.
17:56:14 HALF ACRE TRACT ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS.
17:56:16 MORE IMPORTANT, EVERY SINGLE PROPERTY THAT'S IN THAT
17:56:20 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, IF WE PRECLUDE NO INCREASE IN
17:56:24 DENSITY OR INTENSITY IN A CHH, WE MAY JUST END UP CLOSING
17:56:29 DOWN THE CITY OF TAMPA FOR FUTURE GROWTH.
17:56:31 I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO HYPERBOLE, BUT WE HAVE WORKED
17:56:34 HARD IN LOOKING AT HOW TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.
17:56:38 DO WE USE A ONE PAINTBRUSH, ONE BROAD SWATH OF
17:56:42 PROHIBITING ANY DENSITY INCREASE?
17:56:45 OR DO THEY TAKE A MORE PRACTICAL, REASONABLE APPROACH?
17:56:48 YES, I UNDERSTAND.
17:56:50 IN 2006-2007 ON THE SHRINERS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS, AND
17:56:55 IF YOU LOOK IN THE BACKUP, YOU WILL SEE THOSE FINDINGS OF
17:56:59 FACT VERY CLEARLY LAID OUT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
17:57:02 WE SUPPORT THIS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH
17:57:05 HAZARD AREA.
17:57:06 NO IMPROVEMENTS, NO RAISING OR ELEVATING OF WASHINGTON
17:57:11 STREET.
17:57:11 NO DRAINAGE FACILITIES, UNLIKE OUR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
17:57:15 I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO THE DETAILS ON THIS, WE HAVE TO
17:57:18 MEET THAT BURDEN.
17:57:19 THAT'S PART OF THE MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES.
17:57:22 THAT'S WHY THAT EDITORIAL MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT ON AT
17:57:26 LEAST 30% OF THOSE PROPERTIES, THAT THERE ARE WAYS TO
17:57:29 ACHIEVE.
17:57:31 HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS, CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES,
17:57:34 FLOOD-PROOFING, ELEVATED BUILDINGS.
17:57:36 WE WILL HAVE NO PROBLEMS MEETING THOSE HURRICANE
17:57:39 EVACUATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS.
17:57:41 I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH MR. HEY.
17:57:45 WE THINK THIS INCREASE IS NOT RATTLESNAKE POINT.
17:57:50 THIS IS AN ISOLATED TRACT, AND WASHINGTON STREET WILL BE
17:57:55 IMPROVED.
17:57:56 NEW DRAINAGE, NEW CONVEYANCE STRUCTURES, SIDEWALKS,
17:58:00 WIDENING OF THE PAVEMENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND THAT IS
17:58:03 THE BURDEN THE APPLICANT HAS ACCEPTED ON THIS CASE.
17:58:06 THANK YOU.
17:58:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IT MIGHT BE IN SOMEONE'S MIND, I WAS
17:58:11 NOT HERE IN 2006.
17:58:17 >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING.
17:58:19 THIS IS JOHNATHAN STANTON.
17:58:20 I'M THE OWNER.
17:58:21 I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT WASHINGTON STREET.
17:58:24 WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR THE DENSITY, SO WE COULD BUILD 24
17:58:28 UNITS AN ACRE.
17:58:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHO IS THAT SPEAKING?
17:58:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE OWNER.
17:58:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE -- RIGHT, HE CAN COME IN REBUTTAL.
17:58:41 ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AT THIS PARTICULAR
17:58:44 TIME?
17:58:45 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THAT'S FINE.
17:58:46 MR. STANTON CAN SPEAK LATER.
17:58:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
17:58:49 DID I SEE MS. VELEZ HAND?
17:58:54 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
17:58:56 WE SEEM TO KEEP DIPPING INTO POTENTIAL REZONING THAT
17:58:59 MIGHT OCCUR ON THIS PROPERTY IF THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
17:59:02 AMENDMENT IS CONSIDERED FAVORABLY THIS EVENING BY
17:59:07 COUNCIL.
17:59:07 BUT I DO WANT TO CAUTION YOU AGAINST TAKING INTO
17:59:11 CONSIDERATION OR RECEIVING ANY TESTIMONY ABOUT POTENTIAL
17:59:16 FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS THAT MAY OR, IN FACT, MAY NOT
17:59:19 OCCUR ON THIS PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF WHAT COUNCIL'S
17:59:22 DECISION ON THIS.
17:59:23 SO I HAVE HEARD A COUPLE OF THINGS, POTENTIAL ROADWAY
17:59:25 IMPROVEMENTS, WHAT TYPE OF HOUSING WOULD BE PROVIDED, THE
17:59:30 PRIOR COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AND WHAT OTHER JURISDICTIONS
17:59:32 MIGHT BE DOING WITH DEVELOPMENT IN THEIR AREAS THAT ARE
17:59:36 NOT SUBJECT TO THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:59:39 SO, AGAIN, COUNCIL'S DETERMINATION THIS EVENING IS IN
17:59:42 TERMS OF WHETHER -- CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THIS
17:59:45 PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA'S COMPREHENSIVE
17:59:48 PLAN.
17:59:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MS. JOHNSON-VELEZ.
17:59:53 ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
17:59:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DID YOU ASK FOR THE SECOND FLOOR?
17:59:57 I DON'T KNOW IF WE HEARD ANYBODY FROM THE SECOND FLOOR.
18:00:00 >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
18:00:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK?
18:00:04 >> NO.
18:00:05 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
18:00:08 THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
18:00:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
18:00:11 ANYBODY REGISTERED?
18:00:12 HAD.
18:00:14 >>THE CLERK: NO ONE IS REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
18:00:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. HORNER, I'LL GIVE YOUR CLIENT, WE'RE
18:00:24 SPEAKING ON THE ISSUES OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT, BUT ANY
18:00:28 REFERENCE TO ZONING, I'M GOING TO CUT HIM OFF.
18:00:33 >>DAVID MECHANIK: MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS IS DAVID MECHANIK.
18:00:35 I'M BACK.
18:00:35 I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING HOOKED IN.
18:00:41 I CAN'T UNDERSTAND THAT.
18:00:42 I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR OVER A YEAR NOW.
18:00:45 IN ANY CASE, I WOULD LIKE -- AND MR. STANTON WOULD LIKE
18:00:48 TO ADDRESS THAT.
18:00:49 BUT I'D LIKE TO RESPOND TO MS. JOHNSON-VELEZ'S POINT.
18:00:55 THE STAFF REPORT MADE A LOT OF -- PUT A LOT OF IMPORTANCE
18:01:03 ON THE FACT THAT WASHINGTON IS A SUBSTANDARD ROAD.
18:01:08 I THINK IT IS LEGITIMATE AND WITHIN CITY COUNCIL'S
18:01:12 AUTHORITY TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT UNDER THE CITY
18:01:19 REGULATIONS, A SUBSTANDARD ROAD MUST BE IMPROVED.
18:01:24 IT'S NOT A QUESTION OF WHAT THE APPLICATION, THE REZONING
18:01:28 APPLICATION MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT DO.
18:01:31 IT'S A QUESTION OF THE CITY REGULATIONS.
18:01:34 IF YOU ASSUME EVERY ROAD IS NEVER GOING TO BE IMPROVED,
18:01:37 YOU MIGHT TAKE THE POSITION YOU CAN'T APPROVE ANY PLAN
18:01:41 AMENDMENTS.
18:01:42 AND I WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU CAN TAKE
18:01:46 COGNIZANCE OF THE FACT THAT THE ROAD WILL BE IMPROVED.
18:01:50 THANK YOU.
18:01:50 MR. STANTON AND THEN MICHAEL HORNER MAY WANT TO REBUT.
18:01:57 >> THANK YOU.
18:01:58 THE NUMBERS JUST DON'T WORK WITH THE TU, WITH THE 24
18:02:01 UNANIMOUS.
18:02:01 IT'S GOING TO COST ME ABOUT $1.5 MILLION TO IMPROVE THAT
18:02:05 ROAD.
18:02:06 AND THE ONLY WAY THE NUMBERS WORK IS IF WE'RE ABLE TO GET
18:02:11 THAT DENSITY ON IT.
18:02:12 SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE REALLY REQUESTING THE DENSITY BECAUSE
18:02:17 WE KNOW WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THE MONEY TO IMPROVE THE ROAD.
18:02:19 IF WE DON'T GET THE DENSITY, I WON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO
18:02:22 MAKE IT WORK.
18:02:23 IT JUST WON'T WORK.
18:02:25 I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT.
18:02:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:02:31 STILL WITHIN YOUR FIVE MINUTES.
18:02:32 MR. HORNER, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE BRING
18:02:34 THIS TO A CLOSE?
18:02:36 >>MICHAEL HORNER: I THINK I'VE ADDRESSED ALL THE SALIENT
18:02:39 POINTS THAT I WAS INTENDING TO CONVEY.
18:02:41 AGAIN, COUNCIL, MR. HEY REFERENCED THIS AS SIMILAR TO
18:02:46 RATTLESNAKE POINT.
18:02:47 THIS PARCEL STANDS ON ITS OWN MERIT.
18:02:51 ALREADY APPROVED MORE MULTIFAMILY.
18:02:54 ALREADY IN A TU 24.
18:02:55 WE ARE ISOLATED.
18:02:57 WE ARE LOCKED BETWEEN THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AND TAMPA
18:03:00 BYPASS CANAL.
18:03:00 THIS IS CLOSE PROXIMITY TO U.S. 41.
18:03:06 TRANSIT STOP IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST AT THAT JUNCTURE.
18:03:09 THIS IS GOING TO BE A DEVELOPMENT THAT SERVES THE
18:03:12 RESIDENTS IN THIS AREA IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CBD.
18:03:16 WE CAN ADDRESS ALL OF THE COMPATIBILITY ISSUES ON THE PD
18:03:21 ZONING SIDE OR SITE PLAN.
18:03:22 BUT THIS REQUEST FOR THE COMP PLAN TO RES 35 IS CERTAINLY
18:03:26 CONSISTENT AND YOU ALREADY HAVE APPROVED RMU 100 IN THE
18:03:29 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA TO THE NORTH OF US.
18:03:32 SO WE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR THE RES 35.
18:03:35 THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
18:03:36 APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
18:03:38 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:03:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
18:03:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
18:03:43 WHO IS DOING THIS?
18:03:45 SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ?
18:03:47 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: YES, SIR, I AM.
18:03:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SUSAN, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE
18:03:52 PROPERTY OWNER, MR. STANTON, HE INDICATED FINANCIAL AND
18:04:00 FEASIBILITY AND THAT SORT OF THING.
18:04:02 IS THAT PART OF OUR EVALUATION, EVIDENCE, AND
18:04:06 DELIBERATION?
18:04:09 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THAT IS NOT, SIR.
18:04:10 IT'S NOT.
18:04:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M NOT SAYING HOW I'M GOING TO VOTE
18:04:13 OR NOT VOTE, MR. STANTON, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE
18:04:15 RECORD IS CLEAR ON THAT.
18:04:16 THANK YOU.
18:04:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO HAS MOVED TO CLOSE.
18:04:21 SECONDED BY MR. DINGFELDER.
18:04:25 ALL IN FAVOR?
18:04:25 ANY OPPOSED?
18:04:27 MOTION CARRIED.
18:04:28 MR. VIERA, YOU MIND TAKING NUMBER ONE?
18:04:33 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, I WILL, MR. CHAIR.
18:04:34 I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
18:04:39 CONSIDERATION.
18:04:40 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA
18:04:44 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND
18:04:47 USE MAP, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 302 SOUTH 56th
18:04:50 STREET FROM TRANSITIONAL USE-24 (TU-24) TO RESIDENTIAL-35
18:04:55 (R-35); PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
18:04:59 CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN
18:05:01 EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:05:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA HAS MOVED IT.
18:05:04 MR. MANISCALCO HAS SECONDED IT.
18:05:05 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.
18:05:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST COMMENT ON THE MOTION, IF YOU
18:05:10 WOULD, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:05:11 I KNOW WE ALL HAVE GREAT RESPECT FOR ALL OF OUR STAFF,
18:05:18 INCLUDING MR. HEY AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:05:21 DAVID, I'M GOING TO SUPPORT THIS MOTION AND WITH ALL DUE
18:05:25 RESPECT, AND I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN WHY.
18:05:28 I THINK IT'S A BIT OF A GRAY AREA HERE.
18:05:34 THE UNCONTROVERTED TESTIMONY FROM MR. HORNER IS THAT THIS
18:05:40 IS -- THIS HAS BASICALLY BEEN FILLED IN MANY, MANY YEARS
18:05:45 AGO, AND IT APPEARS TO BE A MUCH HIGHER ELEVATION THAN
18:05:50 MOST OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
18:05:53 CLEARLY, THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE AN EGRESS AND INGRESS
18:05:56 ISSUE, BUT I WOULD JUST -- I'M JUST GOING TO CROSS MY
18:05:59 FINGERS AND HOPE THAT LATER IN THE EVENING WE'RE GOING TO
18:06:02 HEAR THAT WASHINGTON STREET IS NOT ONLY GOING TO BE
18:06:04 IMPROVED, BUT GOING TO BE IMPROVED AT A HIGHER ELEVATION
18:06:08 SO FOLKS WILL BE ABLE TO GET SAFELY IN AND OUT OF THERE
18:06:11 IF THEY HAVE TO EVACUATE.
18:06:15 THAT'S AN ISSUE FOR LATER EVENING.
18:06:17 BUT IN THE MEANTIME, I THINK IT'S A LITTLE SHAKY IN TERMS
18:06:21 OF CALLING THE CHHA WHEN CLEARLY THESE FEMA MAPS CALL IT
18:06:27 SOMETHING ELSE.
18:06:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:06:32 WE HAVE HAD A MOTION TO BE MOVED.
18:06:35 SECONDED IT.
18:06:36 ROLL CALL.
18:06:37 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:06:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:06:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
18:06:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:06:41 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
18:06:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:06:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.
18:06:46 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO.
18:06:48 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
18:06:50 21st, 9:30 A.M.
18:06:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:06:54 WE SAY WE'LL TAKE UP ITEM, 4.
18:06:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN INQUIRE OF MR. MECHANIK, MR.
18:07:00 CHAIRMAN.
18:07:01 MR. MECHANIK, DID YOU WANT TO --
18:07:06 >>DAVID MECHANIK: I WOULD LIKE TO COMBINE ITEM 4 WITH
18:07:10 ITEM 10, ALTHOUGH I WILL SPEAK BRIEFLY ABOUT THE VACATING
18:07:15 PETITION AND THEN RETURN TO MIKE HORNER TO PRESENT MOST
18:07:21 OF THE ZONING APPLICATION ALONG WITH RICKY PETERIKA WHO
18:07:28 IS ALSO WITH US THIS EVENING.
18:07:29 IF THAT IS NOT LEGALLY OBJECTIONABLE, I WOULD LIKE TO GO
18:07:36 AHEAD AND COMBINE THE TWO HEARINGS.
18:07:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THAT'S COUNCIL'S PLEASURE, THAT'S NO
18:07:47 OBJECTION FROM ME, AND THAT WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION AS
18:07:49 WELL IF THAT'S COUNCIL'S PLEASURE.
18:07:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT WILL BE QUASI-
18:07:52 WE NEED TO OPEN THE HEARING, CORRECT, MR. SHELBY?
18:07:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES.
18:07:55 AND SWEAR IN THE WITNESSES.
18:07:56 THESE ARE QUASI-JUDICIAL.
18:07:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:07:58 WE'LL GO TO ITEM NUMBER 4 AND 10.
18:08:07 AND MADAM CLERK, MR. MECHANIK IS ALREADY THERE, MR.
18:08:12 PETERIKA AND MR. HORNER AGAIN.
18:08:16 >>THE CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
18:08:18 DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH
18:08:21 AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
18:08:22 >> I DO.
18:08:23 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.
18:08:27 >>DAVID MECHANIK: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:08:28 ITEM 4 IS --
18:08:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY.
18:08:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE THE
18:08:36 STAFF REPORTS ON BOTH THESE ITEMS BEFORE MR. MECHANIK?
18:08:40 MR. MECHANIK --
18:08:41 >>DAVID MECHANIK: YES, I'M SORRY.
18:08:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT'S OKAY.
18:08:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:08:44 SO RYAN MANASSE.
18:08:49 OR THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:08:49 DAVID.
18:08:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MANASSE INTRODUCES IT, I GUESS.
18:08:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: LONG DAY.
18:08:58 MR. MANASSE.
18:09:02 >> THIS IS ROSS SAMONS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:09:05 I'LL BE PRESENTING FILE VAC 21-01.
18:09:10 IT'S AN ORDINANCE VACATING, CLOSING, DISCONTINUING,
18:09:13 ABANDONING A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED SOUTH OF LEE
18:09:16 ROY SELMON CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY, NORTH OF WASHINGTON
18:09:19 STREET, EAST OF 56th STREET, AND WEST OF TAMPA BAY --
18:09:23 TAMPA BYPASS CANAL WITHIN A PLAT OF THOMAS J. ROBERT
18:09:27 SIX-MILE CREEK SUBDIVISION.
18:09:29 I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE CLERK TO SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
18:09:32 CAN COUNCIL SEE MY SCREEN?
18:09:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOT YET.
18:09:51 NEED TO BLOW IT UP A LITTLE BIT.
18:09:54 >> ROSS SAMONS: HANG ON.
18:10:03 JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE SUMMARY REPORT, THE APPLICANT IS
18:10:07 REQUESTING TO VACATE TO 57th STREET.
18:10:08 IT'S LOCATED AT 302 SOUTH 56th STREET.
18:10:14 THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 11,251 SQUARE FEET, OR .25
18:10:18 ACRES.
18:10:19 THE STREET IS UNIMPROVED.
18:10:21 GRASS AND TREE.
18:10:24 -- SHOWS NO APPARENT USE.
18:10:29 THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
18:10:37 AND NO EASEMENT RESERVATIONS ARE REQUIRED.
18:10:42 THE APPLICANT MUST MEET CHAPTER 27 REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE
18:10:46 PRESERVATION AND WETLANDS ON SITE.
18:10:48 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING HAS NO OBJECTIONS WITH THE
18:10:49 CONDITION THAT A FIVE-YEAR REVERTER IS IN THE VACATING
18:10:57 ORDINANCE.
18:10:58 AGAIN, THE OVERALL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY AND IN YELLOW IS
18:11:03 THE 57th STREET THAT'S BEING REQUESTED TO BE VACATED.
18:11:07 WITHIN THE PLAT OF THOMAS J. ROBERT PLAT, 57th STREET
18:11:18 THERE IN PINK.
18:11:18 AGAIN, HERE IS A SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION,
18:11:27 THE PLATTED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT IS REQUESTED TO BE VACATED
18:11:31 BETWEEN LOT FOUR AND LOT FIVE.
18:11:33 RECOMMENDATION AT THIS TIME STAFF, WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS
18:11:42 TO THE VACATING REQUEST BASED ON RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM
18:11:46 THE REVIEWING AGENCIES.
18:11:47 IF THE VACATING REQUEST IS APPROVED BY COUNCIL,
18:11:50 CONDITIONS FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AGAIN MUST BE INCLUDED
18:11:54 IN APPROVING ORDINANCE AS WELL AS FIVE-YEAR REVERTER
18:11:58 REQUESTED BY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
18:11:59 STAFF IS AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:12:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
18:12:04 THANK YOU, SIR.
18:12:18 >> COUNCIL CHAIR, WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO WITH THE
18:12:20 REZONING?
18:12:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:12:22 >> THANK YOU, SIR.
18:12:23 I WAS GETTING FEEDBACK AND DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING.
18:12:25 ITEM NUMBER 10, FILE REZ 21-62.
18:12:29 THIS IS A REZONING REQUEST AT 302 SOUTH 56th STREET TO
18:12:34 RM 16 TO PD FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
18:12:37 I WOULD LIKE TO GO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR
18:12:39 REPORT, AND IF YOU WOULD PLEASE RETURN TO ME SO I CAN DO
18:12:42 MY PRESENTATION, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.
18:12:44 THANK YOU.
18:12:46 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.
18:12:48 DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:12:51 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:12:52 HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE MY PowerPoint.
18:12:56 HOPEFULLY.
18:13:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE SEE IT, SIR.
18:13:03 >>DAVID HEY: AGAIN, THIS IS REZONING 21-62.
18:13:08 IT IS THE SUBJECT SITE BASED ON THE APPROVAL OF THE PLAN
18:13:13 AMENDMENT PREVIOUSLY.
18:13:15 IT'S NOW DESIGNATED THAT RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE
18:13:20 CATEGORY.
18:13:21 ALSO, THE ACREAGE IS NOW 6.65 DUE TO ANY VACATING.
18:13:28 IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE EAST SIDE COMMERCIAL AREA.
18:13:31 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS THREE-FOURTHS OF A MILE ON 50th
18:13:36 STREET.
18:13:36 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS PALM RIVER
18:13:40 PARK.
18:13:40 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
18:13:43 HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL.
18:13:48 WE SHOULD ALL BE FAMILIAR WITH THIS SITE SINCE WE JUST
18:13:52 LOOKED AT THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
18:13:53 AND HERE WE HAVE NOW THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP NOW THAT IT
18:13:59 IS RESIDENTIAL 35.
18:14:01 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM THAT
18:14:04 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 16 ZONING DISTRICT TO A PLANNED
18:14:08 DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM OF 232 MULTIFAMILY
18:14:13 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
18:14:15 ANY DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDING 199 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IS
18:14:18 REQUIRED TO MEET BONUS CRITERIA WITHIN THE LAND
18:14:21 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
18:14:22 PROPOSED PD IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
18:14:27 AREA.
18:14:28 BASED ON THAT LAND USE POLICY COASTAL MANAGEMENT POLICY
18:14:31 1.1.3.
18:14:33 THOUGH PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE NOT WITHIN THE
18:14:40 BOUNDARIES, AGAIN, IT IS WITHIN THAT -- WITHIN THE
18:14:44 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BASED ON, AGAIN, THAT POLICY.
18:14:47 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS.
18:14:51 AGAIN, THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRING
18:14:55 THAT EAST WASHINGTON STREET, WHICH SERVES AS THE SOLE
18:14:57 ACCESS, BE BROUGHT UP TO FLORIDA GREEN BECOME AND CITY OF
18:15:00 TAMPA STANDARDS.
18:15:01 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SPECIAL MOBILITY POLICIES
18:15:05 2.1.2 AND 2.1.3 PROMOTES THE INCLUSION OF THIS
18:15:10 REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE.
18:15:12 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN PROXIMITY TO THE
18:15:15 CORRIDOR IDENTIFIED AS THE BYPASS CANAL TRAIL.
18:15:18 THE APPLICANT SHOULD COORDINATE WITH THE CITY'S
18:15:21 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE THAT NO NEGATIVE
18:15:24 IMPACTS ARE GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE
18:15:27 IDENTIFIED CORRIDOR.
18:15:28 AGAIN, TRANSIT IS PROVIDED ON SOUTH 50th STREET.
18:15:32 AREAS OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
18:15:34 FOUND ALONG SOUTH 50th STREET AND TO THE NORTH ON ADAMO
18:15:37 DRIVE.
18:15:38 BASED ON THE NEW RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY,
18:15:42 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SUPPORTIVE OF ADDITIONAL INFILL
18:15:46 WHEN LOCATED IN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT AND --
18:15:49 OVERALL, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE INCLUSION OF
18:15:51 ANY CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE CITY'S NATURAL RESOURCES AND
18:15:57 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENTS WOULD MEET THE INTENT OF THE
18:16:01 RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND WOULD BE
18:16:05 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
18:16:09 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE APPROVAL OF
18:16:12 TA/CPA 20-24, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE
18:16:16 PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS
18:16:19 OF THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:16:22 THANK YOU.
18:16:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
18:16:25 ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY?
18:16:26 ALL RIGHT.
18:16:29 MR. MANASSE?
18:16:33 >>RYAN MANASSE: THANK YOU, CHAIR.
18:16:34 GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
18:16:35 RYAN MANASSE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:16:37 AND YOU SHOULD BE SEEING MY SCREEN.
18:16:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE IT, SIR.
18:16:41 >>RYAN MANASSE: ALL RIGHT.
18:16:42 AGAIN, THIS IS ITEM 10, REZ 21-62 FOR THE PROPERTY
18:16:46 LOCATED AT 302 SOUTH 56th STREET.
18:16:48 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ONE CORRECTION TO THE STAFF REPORT.
18:16:53 ON PAGE 6 OF THE STAFF REPORT, I DID HAVE A CLERICAL
18:16:57 ERROR AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION BEING INCONSISTENT, AND
18:16:59 THEY ARE CONSISTENT, AS YOU JUST HEARD FROM DAVID HEY
18:17:01 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, FOR THIS REZONING REQUEST.
18:17:04 THESE ARE THE WAIVERS.
18:17:06 THERE ARE SIX WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
18:17:08 AND THROUGH THIS PRESENTATION I'LL KIND OF GO INTO SOME
18:17:11 OF IT, BUT JUST TO ON-SITE IT, THESE WAIVERS ARE BALANCED
18:17:16 IN STAFF'S POSITION, WHEREAS THE COMPACT SPACES IS NOT A
18:17:20 LARGE INCREASE.
18:17:23 THE GREENSPACE TO THE PARKING, THE REQUIRED PARKING RATIO
18:17:26 IS MORE BALANCED AS THE DEVELOPER COULD HAVE MAYBE TAKEN
18:17:30 ON A LITTLE BIT MORE GREENSPACE, BUT LESS PARKING.
18:17:33 SO STAFF OVERALL FELT THE WAIVERS WERE CONSISTENT AND
18:17:37 BALANCED.
18:17:37 IN THEIR APPROACH.
18:17:39 WE GO INTO THE SITE, THE LOT AREA IS 289,906 SQUARE FEET,
18:17:45 OR APPROXIMATELY 6.65 ACRES.
18:17:47 IT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH OF -- I'M SORRY, THE WEST SIDE
18:17:52 OF SOUTH 56th STREET.
18:17:53 AND IT'S JUST BELOW THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AND THE TAMPA
18:17:56 BYPASS CANAL TO YOUR SOUTH.
18:17:58 THE PROJECT DOES PROPOSE FOUR BUILDINGS.
18:18:02 THREE LARGE BUILDINGS ARE THE MULTIFAMILY PART, AND THEN
18:18:06 YOU HAVE THE FOURTH BUILDING, WHICH WOULD BE THE AMENITY
18:18:08 AREA.
18:18:08 POOL AND CLUBHOUSE AND SUCH.
18:18:11 THOSE BUILDINGS ARE LABELED ON THE SITE PLAN, AND I THINK
18:18:17 YOU CAN SEE IT ON MY SCREEN.
18:18:19 BUILDING A, 87,100 SQUARE FEET.
18:18:22 BUILDING B, WHICH IS LOCATED HERE WHERE MY CURSOR IS,
18:18:25 76,976 SQUARE FEET.
18:18:28 BUILDING C IS 87,100 SQUARE FEET.
18:18:32 AND D, WHICH IS THE AMENITY AREA IS AROUND 2,950 SQUARE
18:18:36 FEET.
18:18:36 THAT'S FOR A TOTAL OF 254,126 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING
18:18:41 AREA.
18:18:41 THE TOTAL DENSITY THAT'S BEING REQUESTED IS 232 DWELLING
18:18:46 UNITS.
18:18:46 THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS AT 56 FEET, 10
18:18:52 INCHES.
18:18:52 SETBACKS SHOWN, 15 FEET FROM THE NORTH, AND THAT'S THE
18:18:58 SELMON EXPRESSWAY SIDE.
18:18:59 SOUTH 8 FEET, EAST 10 FEET, AND WEST 165 FEET.
18:19:03 THE WEST SIDE HERE AND JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME LOCATION,
18:19:08 YOU HAVE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY USES OVER HERE, AND I BELIEVE
18:19:11 MR. HORNER TALKED ABOUT THEM PREVIOUSLY.
18:19:14 I BELIEVE MR. HORNER HAS A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM THE
18:19:16 NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH THAT WAS UPLOADED TO THE RECORD.
18:19:20 AND THEN IT'S RELATIVELY VACANT LAND ALL THE WAY THROUGH
18:19:22 UNTIL YOU GET TO THE 50th STREET, OTHER THAN THE
18:19:26 PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITY THAT WAS DISCUSSED.
18:19:28 A TOTAL OF 408 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 342 ARE
18:19:33 BEING PROVIDED WHICH, AGAIN, TRANSPORTATION FOUND
18:19:36 INCONSISTENT, BUT STAFF DOES SUPPORT THAT WAIVER REQUEST.
18:19:39 AND AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SITE PLAN, THE PARKING LOT IS
18:19:44 LARGE AND PER CODE IT'S STILL NOT BEING -- TO INCREASE
18:19:47 THAT, YOU'D LOSE MORE GREENSPACE.
18:19:50 AGAIN, STAFF HAD TO TAKE THAT APPROACH AND LOOK AT THE
18:19:52 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT'S THE BEST APPROACH TO THIS.
18:19:56 ANOTHER POINT TO BRING UP IS IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THIS 35
18:20:00 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, THE DEVELOPER HAS GONE INTO A
18:20:05 BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, WHICH WILL
18:20:07 PROVIDE 10% OF THESE UNITS AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
18:20:11 NOW, AS MANY COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY KNOW, THAT DOES COME UP
18:20:14 IN A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS, BUT THIS IS WHERE THE CITY CAN
18:20:17 VEST THAT AND SAY 10% WILL BE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
18:20:20 THROUGH THIS BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
18:20:23 IN MY EXPERIENCE WITH BEING IN THE CITY, THIS IS THE
18:20:26 FIRST LARGE-SCALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT THAT I'VE
18:20:30 PROCESSED, AND I DON'T BELIEVE THERE WERE MANY MORE,
18:20:33 MAYBE ONE, PRIOR TO ME.
18:20:34 I'D LIKE TO PUT -- AND I KNOW YOU'VE SEEN THIS MAP
18:20:41 PREVIOUSLY, BUT I DID TRY TO OUTLINE THE PROPERTIES.
18:20:44 THIS IS THE FEMA MAP.
18:20:45 AND SHOWING YOU THAT IT IS A UNIQUE PROPERTY.
18:20:48 AS THE LAND IS OUTSIDE OF THAT FLOOD ZONE, AS MR. HORNER
18:20:51 ALREADY STATED, BUT STAFF WAS LOOKING AT THIS APPROACH
18:20:54 AND DETERMINING WE'RE NOT DISAGREEING THAT IT'S IN THE
18:20:57 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, PER THE PLANNING COMMISSION
18:21:00 DEFINITION AND THEIR POLICIES, BUT STAFF DID REVIEW THIS
18:21:03 TO SEE THE UNIQUENESS OF THE PROPERTY.
18:21:05 ONE POINT I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW IS, AGAIN, THIS IS ZOOMED
18:21:09 OUT FROM THE FEMA MAP, BUT ZOOMED IN, SUBJECT SITE IS
18:21:12 LOCATED RIGHT AROUND HERE, THIS PURPLE BOX.
18:21:15 AND AS YOU COULD SEE, IT'S ONLY THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE
18:21:18 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AS
18:21:21 WELL, BUT YOU CAN SEE IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH IT KIND OF
18:21:24 GETS OUT OF THAT.
18:21:25 THE AERIAL ON SCREEN SHOWS YOU THE 56th STREET TO YOUR
18:21:32 WEST.
18:21:32 THE RED DASHED LINE IS THE SUBJECT PARCEL AND THEN THE
18:21:35 VACATING, AS MR. SAMONS POINTED OUT, IS THE DOUBLE DASHED
18:21:41 LINE IN THE MIDDLE HERE.
18:21:42 YOU HAVE EAST WASHINGTON RUNNING WEST.
18:21:45 AND I INCLUDED THIS AS MORE OF A VISUAL.
18:21:50 THIS WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICANT THROUGH OUR REVIEWS
18:21:52 AND DRC MEETINGS.
18:21:53 I BELIEVE THIS WAS DISCUSSED, THIS AREA FOR THE DRAINAGE
18:21:58 FOR THE EXPRESSWAY.
18:22:00 THIS DID RECEIVE EPC APPROVAL, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY THE
18:22:04 CITY FOR THE IMPACTS TO THE WETLAND HERE TO THE WEST.
18:22:07 THERE ARE TWO ACCESS POINTS OFF OF 56th STREET.
18:22:12 AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THE NORTH AND ON THE SOUTH.
18:22:14 AND THEN JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE PARKING AND
18:22:18 BUILDING ORIENTATION WITH THE AMENITY AREA OVERLAID ON
18:22:21 THAT AERIAL.
18:22:22 THE ELEVATION SHOW STRUCTURES THAT ARE COMPLEMENTARY TO
18:22:27 THE SURROUNDING AREA, IN STAFF'S OPINION, AS WELL AS, YOU
18:22:30 KNOW, IT'S PROVIDING INFILL DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS PART OF
18:22:32 THE CITY THAT HASN'T HAD MUCH GOING ON, SPECIFICALLY FOR
18:22:37 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
18:22:39 AND, AGAIN, AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
18:22:40 HERE'S SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE ITSELF.
18:22:50 AND THEN TO THE RIGHT, MY THIRD PICTURE, THIS IS WEST
18:22:52 WASHINGTON AVENUE AND SOUTH -- AND THE SOUTH NEIGHBOR,
18:22:56 WHICH IS THIS FENCED PROPERTY.
18:22:59 AND THEN LOOKING WEST TOWARDS THE CITY.
18:23:01 THE NEXT PHOTOS I'M SHOWING, THIS IS NORTH ON 56st
18:23:06 STREET.
18:23:07 SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS IMMEDIATELY TO THE RIGHT, AND
18:23:09 THERE'S A SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE LEFT.
18:23:10 AND THEN THE MIDDLE PICTURE SOUTH ON 56th STREET.
18:23:14 AND THAT WOULD BE GOING DOWN TO THAT S.W.F.W.M.D.
18:23:16 PROPERTY.
18:23:17 THE TRUCK IS KIND OF BLOCKING THE VIEW OF THE ENTRANCE TO
18:23:20 THAT PROPERTY.
18:23:20 AND THEN IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THAT BLACK TRUCK IN THE
18:23:23 CENTER PICTURE IS THE OTHER RESIDENCE TO THE SOUTH,
18:23:25 WHICH, AGAIN, I BELIEVE MICHAEL HORNER OR DAVE MECHANIK
18:23:28 CAN ADDRESS WITH THEIR LETTERS OF SUPPORT THAT THEY
18:23:29 SUBMITTED.
18:23:30 A BETTER PICTURE OF THE WEST NEIGHBOR WHERE YOU SEE THE
18:23:35 DRIVEWAY HERE.
18:23:35 THIS IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME TO THE NORTH SIDE OF
18:23:38 WASHINGTON STREET ON THE PICTURE TO THE RIGHT.
18:23:40 I WANTED TO SHOW YOU SOME VIEWS UP AND DOWN 50th
18:23:44 STREET.
18:23:44 AT THE CORNER, YOU DO HAVE A GAS STATION, AND I BELIEVE A
18:23:49 DUNKIN' DONUTS, CONVENIENCE GOODS, RETAIL SALES
18:23:51 ESTABLISHMENT.
18:23:52 NORTH, AS YOU CAN SEE, 50th STREET IS A LARGE TRANSIT
18:23:56 STREET.
18:23:56 AND THEN GOING SOUTH YOU COULD SEE THE CONNECTIONS TO THE
18:23:59 EXPRESSWAY AND THEN GOING UNDER THE EXPRESSWAY, WHICH YOU
18:24:02 CAN GET TO ADAMO.
18:24:06 OVERALL, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS
18:24:09 REVIEWED THE APPLICATION, AND WE DO FIND IT CONSISTENT
18:24:11 WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES.
18:24:13 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS
18:24:15 APPLICATION AND THE WAIVERS ATTACHED TO IT, THERE ARE
18:24:18 SOME MINOR CORRECTIONS WE WOULD REQUIRE BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:24:20 SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE.
18:24:21 WITH THAT BEING SAID, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY
18:24:24 QUESTIONS.
18:24:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?
18:24:26 DINGFELDER, YOU GOT -- OKAY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
18:24:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:24:32 A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, RYAN.
18:24:33 GOOD EVENING.
18:24:33 >>RYAN MANASSE: GOOD EVENING.
18:24:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN REGARD TO -- WELL, LET ME START OFF
18:24:38 -- IN REGARD TO THE RIVER, YEAH, WELL -- COME FORWARD,
18:24:50 TOO.
18:24:50 YEAH, THAT'S GOOD.
18:24:51 I LIKE THE OTHER ONE.
18:24:57 YEAH.
18:25:03 SO IN REGARD TO THE RIVER, DID THEY HAVE TO NOTICE ACROSS
18:25:06 THE RIVER TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE COUNTY, I
18:25:14 DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR NOTICE PROVISION SAYS ABOUT BODIES OF
18:25:18 WATER.
18:25:18 I THOUGHT IT SAID YOU JUMP ACROSS.
18:25:20 BUT ANYWAY, DOES ANYBODY KNOW THAT?
18:25:25 CATE, DO YOU KNOW?
18:25:27 >>RYAN MANASSE: IT WOULD BE 250 FEET FROM SURROUNDING
18:25:30 PROPERTIES, UNLESS -- CATE, UNLESS THERE'S SOMETHING I'M
18:25:33 NOT AWARE OF.
18:25:36 >>CATE WELLS: I'VE NOT SEEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE.
18:25:38 PERHAPS MR. HORNER CAN CONFIRM WHO WAS NOTICED.
18:25:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THAT'S THE FIRST QUESTION, WHILE
18:25:44 YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT THAT, MICHAEL.
18:25:45 THEN THE SECOND QUESTION GOES TO RYAN, TO YOU AND CATE AS
18:25:49 WELL, YOU KNOW, IF THIS WAS -- IF THE WATER DIDN'T EXIST
18:25:57 WE MIGHT BE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE COMPATIBILITY AND
18:26:00 CONSISTENCY OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT
18:26:03 TO WHATEVER THIS IS, 200-PLUS UNITS OF MULTIFAMILY AND
18:26:09 FOUR OR FIVE STORIES, WHATEVER.
18:26:10 SO, BUT, BECAUSE THE WATER IS THERE, AND THEY ARE IN THE
18:26:16 UNINCORPORATED COUNTY, DOES THAT DIMINISH THOSE CONCERNS?
18:26:21 AND RYAN, I DON'T RECALL IF YOU EVEN MENTIONED ABOUT
18:26:25 THOSE SOMEWHAT SEMI ADJACENT PARCELS.
18:26:29 AND THEN I HAVE ONE OR TWO OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT
18:26:31 AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
18:26:36 >>RYAN MANASSE: LET ME ANSWER THE FIRST QUESTION,
18:26:38 COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER.
18:26:39 WE DO FEEL IT IS COMPARABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
18:26:42 IT IS A MIXTURE OF USES IN THE AREA.
18:26:43 THERE ARE A COUPLE OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IMMEDIATELY TO
18:26:45 THE WEST, BUT THOSE ARE IN THE RN, RESIDENTIAL -- RM,
18:26:49 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT.
18:26:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M TALKING SPECIFICALLY ACROSS THE
18:26:53 RIVER.
18:26:53 >>RYAN MANASSE: CORRECT, SIR.
18:26:55 I WAS GETTING THERE.
18:26:57 TO THE SOUTH, THERE IS A LARGE BODY OF WATER SEPARATING
18:27:00 THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
18:27:03 AGAIN, WITH COMPATIBILITY, WE FEEL THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE.
18:27:05 AGAIN, THE EXPRESSWAY IS TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY
18:27:09 MORE OF A COMMERCIAL ASPECT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:27:13 AND THEN YOU HAVE THAT INDUSTRIAL USE TO THE NORTH OF
18:27:15 THAT.
18:27:16 SO, AGAIN, STAFF DOES FEEL IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THAT
18:27:19 AREA.
18:27:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:27:20 AND IN REGARD TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING, A COUPLE OF
18:27:23 QUESTIONS.
18:27:24 ONE, HOW DO WE DEFINE -- HOW DO WE DEFINE AFFORDABLE
18:27:31 HOUSING FOR THIS PROJECT?
18:27:32 X PERCENTAGE OF INCOME, THAT SORT OF THING?
18:27:38 YES, MS. WELLS.
18:27:39 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU.
18:27:41 CATE WELLS, FOR THE RECORD.
18:27:42 THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT THAT IS BEING NEGOTIATED,
18:27:47 AND IF THIS APPLICATION RECEIVES APPROVAL THIS EVENING,
18:27:51 WILL BE INCLUDED AT SECOND READING.
18:27:53 THE BPA REQUIRES THAT 10% OF THE UNITS WILL BE USED FOR
18:27:59 AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND THAT IS A REQUIREMENT IN SECTION
18:28:02 27-140 OF OUR CODE, WHICH SETS OUT THE DIFFERENT WAYS THE
18:28:09 BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT MAY BE NEGOTIATED.
18:28:11 AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE, THE AREA MEDIAN INCOME WILL
18:28:17 BE BETWEEN 80% AND 120%.
18:28:19 THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT THAT MR. MECHANIK AND I HAD
18:28:24 NEGOTIATED, 12 OF THE UNITS WILL BE UP TO 80% AMI AND THE
18:28:30 OTHER 12 UNITS EQUALING THE 10% WILL THEN BE UP TO A 120%
18:28:37 AMI.
18:28:38 AND THAT PERIOD OF AFFORDABILITY WILL BE FOR 30 YEARS.
18:28:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND HOW WOULD WE ENFORCE THAT IF ALL
18:28:49 OF A SUDDEN -- I MEAN, I ASSUME THIS IS STARTING OUT AS
18:28:52 RENTAL -- I DON'T KNOW.
18:28:53 MAYBE IT'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE RENTAL, WHICH IS NEITHER
18:28:56 HERE NOR THERE, BUT HOW WOULD WE ENFORCE THAT?
18:29:00 >>CATE WELLS: THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION, AND THAT'S WHY THE
18:29:03 FINAL VERSION OF THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IS NOT
18:29:06 BEFORE COUNCIL THIS EVENING.
18:29:07 THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER BONUS PROVISION
18:29:10 AGREEMENTS THAT WE'VE NEGOTIATED BECAUSE TYPICALLY WITH A
18:29:15 STANDARD AGREEMENT, IF THERE'S A DEFAULT, THE DEVELOPER
18:29:19 DOESN'T GET THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
18:29:21 THEY DON'T GET TO ACTUALLY OPEN UP UNTIL THEY'VE COMPLIED
18:29:25 WITH THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
18:29:27 THIS IS DIFFERENT IN THAT THE PERIOD OF DEFAULT OCCURS
18:29:30 AFTER THE DENSITY HAS ALREADY BEEN BUILT OUT.
18:29:33 SO WE ARE LOOKING AT -- MR. MECHANIK AND I HAVE BEEN
18:29:39 DISCUSSING INCLUDING A FINANCIAL PENALTY THAT WOULD
18:29:44 REFLECT THE VALUE OF THE INCREASED DENSITY THAT IS BEING
18:29:50 SOUGHT UNDER THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
18:29:53 AND THAT IS THE LANGUAGE AND THE TERMS THAT WILL BE
18:29:56 BEFORE COUNCIL AT SECOND READING IF THIS MEETS WITH YOUR
18:30:01 APPROVAL THIS EVENING.
18:30:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND, OBVIOUSLY, THAT WOULD RUN WITH
18:30:04 THE LAND?
18:30:06 >>CATE WELLS: YES, SIR.
18:30:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:30:07 AND THEN MY LAST QUESTION IS, PERHAPS EITHER TO YOU OR TO
18:30:13 MR. MECHANIK OR MAYBE TO MR. STANTON, IS I THINK IT'S
18:30:17 FANTASTIC WE'RE FINALLY GETTING SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING
18:30:21 BUILT IN TO THESE OTHER PROJECTS, BUT MY QUESTION IS, IS
18:30:26 THERE ASSURANCE THAT THESE UNITS, 24 UNITS OR WHATEVER IT
18:30:30 IS ARE GOING TO BE FULLY INTEGRATED AND MIXED IN WITH THE
18:30:34 MARKET RATE AS OPPOSED TO BEING A STAND-ALONE, HEY,
18:30:39 THAT'S THE POOR PEOPLE'S BUILDING?
18:30:51 >>DAVID MECHANIK: THIS IS DAVE MECHANIK.
18:30:55 THE BUILDINGS CONTAIN MANY MORE UNITS THAN 24, AND THEY
18:30:58 WILL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE OTHER MARKET RATE RENTAL
18:30:59 UNITS.
18:31:01 THERE WILL BE NO SEGREGATION.
18:31:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
18:31:11 SO I THINK THAT WILL BE A SIMPLE NOTE, MR. MANASSE TO
18:31:16 HAVE THIS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING SO NO
18:31:18 QUESTION ABOUT THAT AND IT WOULD BE HARD TO IDENTIFY
18:31:20 WHERE THE UNITS ARE AT THIS STAGE AND I AM NOT ASKING
18:31:24 ANYBODY TO DO IT BUT A SIMPLE NOTE OF MR. MECHANIK'S
18:31:27 ASSERTION WILL BE A GOOD THING.
18:31:31 >>RYAN MANASSE: CATE, DO YOU HAVE ANY HEARTBURN TO
18:31:31 THAT?
18:31:34 >>CATE WELLS: NO, I BELIEVE THAT LANGUAGE IS INCLUDED
18:31:39 IN THE DRAFT AGREEMENT.
18:31:41 >> SO ROLL THAT ON THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:31:45 SECOND READING AS LONG AS THE AGENT AND OWNER AGREE.
18:31:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, EVERYBODY.
18:31:50 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
18:31:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA.
18:31:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WHATEVER THE UNITS COME OUT 20, 24,
18:31:57 WHATEVER.
18:32:01 THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT HE WANTS
18:32:06 WITH HIS BUILDING; HOWEVER, AMOUNT OF DENSITY IS BASED
18:32:08 ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
18:32:11 IF THE OWNER SELLS A BUILDING TO SOMEONE ELSE AND
18:32:12 EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE IN LIFE.
18:32:18 AND THAT PERSON THEN WANTS A CONDO UNIT OUT, WHAT HANS
18:32:20 TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING?
18:32:23 >>DAVID MECHANIK: IT IS A REQUIRED --
18:32:25 >>CATE WELLS: IF I MAY RESPOND TO THAT.
18:32:29 THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IS RECORDED.
18:32:33 A MATTER OF RECORD IF OWNERSHIP WERE TO CHANGE HANDS,
18:32:35 IT WOULD BE A MATTER OF RECORD WHEN YOU PULL TITLE.
18:32:44 WE ALSO REQUIRE THAT THE AFFORDABILITY OF 30 YEARS, WE
18:32:45 HONOR THAT.
18:32:48 IN THE AGREEMENT WHEN WE SEE IT AT SECOND READING, IT
18:32:52 ALLOWS THE CITY TO DO ANNUAL INSPECTIONS.
18:32:55 THE DEVELOPER WILL REQUIRE TO PROVIDE ANNUAL REPORTS SO
18:32:58 THERE WILL BE A CONTINUING OVERSIGHT TO ENSURE THAT THE
18:33:02 PERIOD OF AFFORDABILITY IS HONORED.
18:33:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:33:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
18:33:15 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. MANASSE?
18:33:18 WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
18:33:22 >>DAVID MECHANIK: MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS, MY NAME
18:33:22 IS DAVID MECHANIK.
18:33:27 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF MR. STANTON.
18:33:35 WITH ME THIS EVENING IS OUR CIVIL ENGINEER -- I AM
18:33:40 SORRY, TIM HEALEY.
18:33:44 WE HAVE MICHAEL HORNER, WHO WILL PRESENT MOST OF THE
18:33:52 INFORMATION ON THE ZONING AND RICKY PETERIKA WHO WILL
18:33:56 SPEAK REGARDING THE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMENTS
18:33:56 REGARDING THE ZONING.
18:33:59 I WOULD FIRST LIKE TO MENTION THAT IT IS A RELATIVELY
18:34:06 SIMPLE APPLICATION, SO WE CAN GET THIS OUT OF THE WAY,
18:34:11 I THINK QUICKLY IN THAT THE VACATING PETITION IS A
18:34:15 DEDICATED ROADWAY THAT HAS NEVER BEEN IMPROVED, NEVER
18:34:22 BEEN USED BY THE PUBLIC AND NEVER NEED TO BE USED
18:34:25 BECAUSE IT IS ONLY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SEPTIC
18:34:28 PROBLEM.
18:34:32 I WOULD JUST POINT OUT TO COUNCIL THAT NO CITY
18:34:38 DEPARTMENT OR PUBLIC UTILITY HAD ANY OBJECTION TO THIS
18:34:42 VACATION, AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR
18:34:53 APPROVAL ONCE WE CONCLUDED THE ZONING PRESENTATION.
18:34:55 MOVES INTO THE ZONING APPLICATION AS USUAL.
18:35:02 RYAN HAS DONE A VERY THOROUGH REPORT.
18:35:04 WE WOULD JUST LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT ALL THE
18:35:09 REVISIONS THAT ARE LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, WE WILL
18:35:15 MAKE THOSE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS
18:35:17 WAS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED.
18:35:22 WE ARE WORKING ON A BONUS AGREEMENT WHICH WOULD BE A
18:35:25 FINALIZED -- SIGNED AND FINALIZED BY SECOND READING
18:35:30 SHOULD COUNCIL BE INCLINED TO APPROVE THE ZONING
18:35:31 APPLICATION.
18:35:37 IT WILL PROVIDE A REQUIREMENT FOR -- 24 AFFORDABLE
18:35:39 HOUSING UNITS.
18:35:42 THIS IS NOT A SPECULATIVE TYPE THING.
18:35:46 IT WILL BE A LEGALLY BINDING DEED RESTRICTION.
18:35:49 AGREEMENT WILL BE RECORDED AND WILL BE IN EFFECT FOR A
18:35:51 PERIOD OF 30 YEARS.
18:35:57 AND THAT WOULD BE EFFECTIVELY NO -- THERE IS NO WAY TO
18:36:04 AVOID IN ANY WAY WHETHER -- IT WILL BE NO WAY TO
18:36:08 FULFILL THOSE OBLIGATIONS.
18:36:12 I WOULD LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO MIKE HORNER WHO WILL
18:36:15 DESCRIBE THE PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AND DISCUSS
18:36:19 THE WAIVERS.
18:36:21 THANK YOU.
18:36:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MECHANIK, MR. HORNER, BEFORE
18:36:29 YOU KEEP GOING.
18:36:33 I AM CURIOUS, ANYBODY ON THE LINE WITH THIS ONE.
18:36:36 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR NUMBER 10,
18:36:38 NOT NUMBER 4.
18:36:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NUMBER 10, OKAY.
18:36:40 THANK YOU.
18:36:44 CARRY ON.
18:36:46 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
18:36:53 AGAIN, FOR THE RECORD MICHAEL HORNER, 14502 NORTH DALE
18:36:56 MABRY HIGHWAY REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT OF THE ZONING
18:36:56 BEFORE YOU.
18:36:59 IF WE CAN ELEVATE MR. STANTON AND TWO OF THE
18:37:09 POWERPOINTS.
18:37:11 >> CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
18:37:14 OH, WAIT, HERE IT IS.
18:37:16 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THANKS, JONATHAN.
18:37:19 AND I WANT TO SAY WE CERTAINLY HAVE NO DISAGREEMENT
18:37:26 WITH MR. HAYES' EXCELLENT REPORT FROM THE PLANNING
18:37:27 COMMISSION ON THIS CASE.
18:37:30 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:37:32 SO COUNCIL PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE STARTED WITH THIS SLIDE
18:37:35 ON THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT.
18:37:41 IT IS HARD TO DESCRIBE THE FILL AND HOW THIS PARCEL WAS
18:37:42 CREATED.
18:37:51 I THINK THIS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH IN 1965 ADDRESSED IT AS
18:37:52 SUCCINCTLY AS POSSIBLE.
18:37:57 THE MAGENTA PINK LINES WITH THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY --
18:38:01 SOON-TO-BE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE LINES WE HAVE
18:38:05 TO THE NORTH REPRESENT THE CURRENT EXPRESSWAY IN 2021.
18:38:08 THE LINE TO THE WEST IS THE CANAL 2021 THAT IS NOT
18:38:09 THERE.
18:38:15 AND YOU CAN SEE THE LINE ON THE SOUTH, THE S.W.F.W.M.D.
18:38:20 PROPERTY, THAT IS THE CURRENT SHORELINE CURRENTLY
18:38:21 TODAY.
18:38:25 PALM RIVER WAS A LITTLE MEANDERING STREET UNTIL IT WAS
18:38:28 CHANNELIZED, DREDGED, AND EXCAVATED BY THE TURNPIKE
18:38:33 AUTHORITY, EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY IN 1965 AND 1970.
18:38:36 WE ARE 100% WATER BACK THEN.
18:38:45 AND WE ARE 100% FILL.
18:38:47 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:38:51 HERE WE ARE TODAY IN 2021, YOU CAN SEE HOW THAT BYPASS
18:38:53 CANAL HAS CERTAINLY EXPANDED.
18:38:57 A LOT OF THAT PROPERTY HAS NOW BEEN EXCAVATED ON THE
18:38:57 SOUTH SIDE.
18:39:01 OUR PROPERTY IS NOW CLOSER TO THE BYPASS CANAL AND, OF
18:39:04 COURSE, THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS IN PLACE DIRECTLY
18:39:07 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:39:10 THAT CANAL BETWEEN THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY'S PROPERTY
18:39:14 ON THE WEST SIDE HAS NOW BEEN IN PLACE AND CONVEYS THE
18:39:17 STORMWATER DRAINAGE FROM THE EXPRESSWAY IMPROVEMENTS
18:39:22 ALL THE WAY TO THE BYPASS CANALS AS REFERENCED BEFORE.
18:39:24 NEXT SLIDE.
18:39:28 COUNCIL, AGAIN, THIS IS A ZONING PATTERN.
18:39:31 RYAN HAS GONE THROUGH THIS AND JUST TO HIGHLIGHT, WE
18:39:32 ARE IN RM-16.
18:39:35 WE HAVE CI ZONING TO THE WEST.
18:39:37 WE HAVE CI ZONING TO THE NORTHWEST.
18:39:42 ALL OF THE NORTHERN PROPERTY IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OR
18:39:43 INDUSTRIAL-GENERAL.
18:39:46 WE HAVE IG PROPERTY TO THE WEST AND RM-24.
18:39:49 WE NOW WILL BE ASKING FOR THE RES-35 THAT YOU JUST
18:39:54 APPROVED AND OUR REZONING IS THAT RES-35 DESIGNATION.
18:39:58 NEXT SLIDE.
18:40:04 AGAIN, THE FUTURE LAND USE, WE NOW ARE RES-35.
18:40:07 THIS PROPERTY IS COMPLETELY ISOLATED AND NESTLED WITHIN
18:40:09 THAT CORRIDOR.
18:40:13 AGAIN, WE HAVE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH.
18:40:14 RMU TO THE NORTHWEST.
18:40:18 THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND
18:40:20 DEVELOPMENT PLANT IS CERTAINLY CONSISTENT WITH THE
18:40:23 GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
18:40:26 PLAN, TAMPA, AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING PATTERNS.
18:40:31 NEXT SLIDE.
18:40:33 AGAIN, JUST THE HIGHLIGHTS.
18:40:36 WHY WE ARE OUTSIDE THE CHH.
18:40:40 I THINK THE FIRST AND SECOND SLIDE TELL THE STORY.
18:40:43 YOU HAVE ALREADY SEEN THIS GRAPHIC.
18:40:45 JUST WANT TO REPRESENT THAT WE ARE OUTSIDE THE COASTAL
18:40:49 HIGH HAZARD AREA EXCEPT FOR THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY
18:40:52 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM TO THE BYPASS CANAL.
18:40:55 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:40:57 AGAIN, THE FLOOD ZONE MAP.
18:41:00 WE WANT TO INCORPORATE IT INTO THE RECORD FOR THE
18:41:01 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REQUEST.
18:41:06 THIS IS OUTSIDE OF FEMA FLOOD ZONE HAZARD AREA.
18:41:09 ALL THE PROPERTY DEVELOPING WITHIN THIS PROPERTY WILL
18:41:14 NOT HAVE TO CARRY FLOOD INSURANCE.
18:41:17 THE SLIGHT CANAL ENCROACHMENT ON THE WESTERN SIDE,
18:41:21 AGAIN, REPRESENT THE REMNANT WETLAND AND THE EASEMENTS
18:41:25 OF THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY TO THE BYPASS CANAL.
18:41:28 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:41:31 THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN -- I BELIEVE RYAN HAD
18:41:33 THIS GRAPHIC AS WELL.
18:41:35 AGAIN THIS IS A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT, COUNCIL.
18:41:40 WE HAVE A VERY UNIQUE TRACT WITH UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHY
18:41:41 CONNECTIONS.
18:41:45 WILL TAKE SIGNIFICANT ALTERATION TO DEVELOP THIS
18:41:46 PROPERTY.
18:41:48 CAN'T BEAT THE LOCATION.
18:41:50 PROXIMITY TO IMPROVEMENT.
18:41:52 PROXIMITY TO ACCESS.
18:41:53 PRINCIPAL HIGHWAYS.
18:41:57 TRANSIT AND THE ORIENTATION TO THE BYPASS CANAL.
18:42:00 THESE WILL BE ELEVATED STRUCTURES, CLUSTERED
18:42:02 DEVELOPMENT, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT.
18:42:04 WE HAVE THREE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, FOUR
18:42:05 FLOORS EACH.
18:42:09 AND THE CLUBHOUSE, AMENITY, POOL AREA THAT DIRECTLY
18:42:11 FRONTS ON TO THE RIVER.
18:42:13 ON TO THE WESTERN SIDE, THAT IS THE EXPRESSWAY
18:42:17 AUTHORITY'S DRAINAGE SYSTEM THAT IS NOW DEEMED A
18:42:21 WETLAND BECAUSE EPC SAYS THAT WATER HAS BEEN THERE A
18:42:25 NUMBER OF YEARS AND THEREFORE WE REFLECT IT AND SEE THE
18:42:26 JURISDICTIONAL LINE.
18:42:30 WE HAVE NOT REPRESENTED ANY ENCROACHMENT BUT THE DRIVE
18:42:31 AISLES THAT YOU WILL SEE.
18:42:37 MR. PETERIKA WILL ADDRESS THOSE FOLLOWING MY
18:42:38 PRESENTATION.
18:42:45 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:42:48 COUNCIL, THIS IS HOW IT WILL LAY OUT.
18:42:57 A THREE-DIMENSIONAL ELEVATION GRAPHIC IMPOSE $ON THE
18:42:58 PROPERTY.
18:43:02 WE ARE BETWEEN THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AND THE BYPASS
18:43:02 CANAL.
18:43:06 THIS IS AN INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY.
18:43:09 WE HAVE SCATTERED RESIDENTIAL.
18:43:14 ONE OR TWO HOMES TO THE WEST AND THEY LIVE IN THE
18:43:15 SOUTHWEST QUADRANT.
18:43:18 THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS, THAT PROPERTY WAS I
18:43:20 BELIEVE THREE FOLIOS.
18:43:26 THEIR ADDRESS OF RECORD IS 5507, 5509, AND 5511 EAST
18:43:27 WASHINGTON STREETS.
18:43:31 IF I CAN READ FROM THEIR E-MAIL THAT I SENT IN TO
18:43:32 COUNCIL, CLERK'S OFFICE.
18:43:36 I AM ONE OF TWO PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO 302
18:43:38 SOUTH 56TH STREET.
18:43:42 SIX PROPERTY OWNERS ON EAST WASHINGTON STREET, FOUR OF
18:43:43 WHICH ARE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
18:43:46 ALL THESE PROPERTIES ARE MULTIACRES.
18:43:49 EAST WASHINGTON STREET DOES NOT HAVE WATER, SEWER,
18:43:53 STORMWATER, SIDEWALKS, CABLE, HIGH-SPEED INTERNET.
18:43:57 PHONE LANES DAMAGED BY FRONTIER AND STILL NOT REPAIRED.
18:44:00 NO INFRASTRUCTURE CITY HERE OTHER THAN THE ROADWAY
18:44:06 WHICH IS SELDOM MAINTAINED.
18:44:09 IT WOULD BE WELCOME TO HAVE WHAT OTHER TAKE FOR GRANTED
18:44:12 AND THEY SUPPORT THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND PD.
18:44:15 YOU CAN SEE HOW THE BUILDINGS ARE ORIENTED TO LIE
18:44:24 WITHIN THAT POCKET AREA.
18:44:28 I WANT TO INDICATE THAT THE TAMPA BYPASS TRAIL CAME UP
18:44:31 IN OUR DRC MEETINGS.
18:44:36 WE FULLY SUPPORT THAT TRAIL AND THINK IT IS SUPPORTIVE
18:44:37 OF OUR RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY.
18:44:41 THE TRAIL ON THE SOUTH SIDE PARALLELS THAT S.W.F.W.M.D.
18:44:44 DRIVEWAY AND WE ENCOURAGE THAT AND PROVIDE FOR DIRECT
18:44:47 CONNECTIVITY FROM OUR RESIDENTS, THAT DEVELOPMENT, TO
18:44:48 THAT TRAIL.
18:44:58 NEXT LIED PROPOSING A LITTLE MORE DETAIL AND THE
18:44:59 IMPROVEMENTS.
18:45:02 THIS IS THE CLUBHOUSE AMENITY AREA.
18:45:05 LOOKING INTERNAL NORTH TO SOUTH FROM THE PROPERTY, AND
18:45:09 THEN LOOKING ACROSS THE POOL MORE INTO THE CLUBHOUSE
18:45:14 WHICH AGAIN WILL BE ORIENTED.
18:45:15 NEXT SLIDE.
18:45:18 IN SUMMARY, COUNCILMEMBERS, THIS IS ONE OF THE LARGEST
18:45:25 VACANT PARCELS IN TAMPA NEAR PRINCIPAL HIGHWAYS FOR THE
18:45:27 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OF TAMPA.
18:45:33 AS NOTED, THIS IS MAN-MADE 6.65-ACRE TRACT WITH NO
18:45:37 NATIVE VEGETATION, COMPRISED OF 100% FILL.
18:45:43 AND THE LARGE-SCALE DESIGNATED AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITH
18:45:48 24 FOR RENTALS WHO EARN NOR MORE THAN 80 TO 100% OF THE
18:45:50 AREA INCOME.
18:45:53 AS YOU HEARD FLORIDA PRIOR PRESENTATIONS, EVERYBODY
18:45:54 TALKS ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
18:45:58 EVERYBODY TRIES TO GET THAT LITTLE HEADS-UP ON THE GOOD
18:46:04 -- THE GOOD PLAN PROPOSALS BUT IT COMES DOWN TO WHETHER
18:46:08 OR NOT YOU ARE TRULY DEDICATING THESE UNITS UNDER BONUS
18:46:11 PROVISION, UNDER A BIND AGREEMENT AND ACTIVITY UP TO 30
18:46:11 YEARS.
18:46:15 AND OUR CLIENT IS ONE OF THE FIRST ONES TO COMMIT TO
18:46:15 THAT.
18:46:16 I THINK THAT IS COMMENDABLE.
18:46:19 WE ARE CURRENTLY APPROVED FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
18:46:23 IN THE FUTURE LAND USE AND MULTIFAMILY ZONING.
18:46:27 CLUSTER DESIGN IS NOTICED THREE FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS,
18:46:32 AMENITIES, PARCEL ABUTS THE EXPRESSWAY, HEAVY USES TO
18:46:33 THE NORTH.
18:46:35 S.W.F.W.M.D. AND POND TO THE SOUTH.
18:46:40 WE ARE TRULY ISOLATED AND INFILL ON THIS MAN-MADE AREA.
18:46:44 THIS ALLOWS FOR DIRECT CONNECTIVITY TO THE PROPOSED
18:46:47 TAMPA BYPASS CANAL TRAIL THINK THAT HIGHLIGHTED WITH
18:46:51 TRANSIT STOP THROUGH U.S. 41, 50TH STREET.
18:46:53 AND LASTLY, THIS REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT
18:46:56 PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO
18:46:59 WASHINGTON STREET INCLUDING DRAINAGE, PUBLIC
18:47:03 FACILITIES, ROAD WIDENING, SIDEWALKS, AND MEETING ALL
18:47:06 THE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS THAT WE WILL HAVE TO GO
18:47:08 THROUGH WITH SITE REVIEW AND PERMITTING.
18:47:10 THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
18:47:12 WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT.
18:47:15 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
18:47:18 MR. DINGFELDER, DID YOU ASK INITIALLY ABOUT THE NOTICE.
18:47:21 WE SIMPLY RECEIVED A CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER REPORT
18:47:26 FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE FOR THE 250-YARD
18:47:27 RADIUS.
18:47:30 WE NOTICED ALL THOSE OWNERS OF RECORD.
18:47:34 I DO NOT BELIEVE THOSE PROPERTIES WERE WITHIN THAT
18:47:38 250-FOOT NOTICE RANGE TO THE SOUTH SO I DON'T BELIEVE
18:47:39 THEY WERE NOTICED.
18:47:39 THANK YOU.
18:47:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.
18:47:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
18:47:49 >>MICHAEL HORNER: RICKY PETERIKA AT THIS TIME UNTIL
18:47:51 THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:47:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY, MR. HORNER, THANK YOU FOR
18:48:00 YOUR CLIENT'S WORK ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING; HOWEVER, YOU
18:48:02 WERE GOING TO BE THE FIRST REPRESENTATIVE THAT I ASK
18:48:06 THIS QUESTION OF -- WELCOME TO MY WORLD.
18:48:13 IT IS NOT REQUIRED; HOWEVER, I AM HOPING THAT ONE DAY
18:48:14 IT WILL BE.
18:48:18 WITH THIS PROJECT BEING THIS LARGE, IS THERE PLANS ON
18:48:21 HAVING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS WITHIN THIS
18:48:26 PROJECT?
18:48:31 >>MICHAEL HORNER: THAT IS A GOOD QUESTION, COUNCILMAN.
18:48:35 I AM NOT IN A POSITION TO OPINE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.
18:48:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I DON'T MEAN TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT
18:48:39 BUT A QUESTION I WILL BE ASKING.
18:48:45 MR. HEALY, ROCK CHALK, BROTHER.
18:48:48 >> THANK YOU.
18:48:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. HORNER, YOU HAVE OTHERS THAT NEED
18:48:52 TO SPEAK?
18:48:56 OR DO WE MOVE ON -- ANYONE ELSE WHO WANT TO SPEAK?
18:48:58 ANY OTHERS ON YOUR TEAM?
18:49:02 >>MICHAEL HORNER: YES, MR. PETERIKA WILL PRESENT A
18:49:03 SHORT PRESENTATION.
18:49:05 THANK YOU.
18:49:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: TWO MINUTES LEFT?
18:49:23 OKAY.
18:49:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHENEVER YOU ARE READY, SIR.
18:49:34 >> RICKY PETERIKA: COUNCIL, APOLOGIZE, THIS IS RICKY
18:49:41 PETERIKA, AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN, AND I HAVE DIFFICULTY
18:49:46 WITH MY HEADSET AND I WILL TRY PRESENT AND HAND OFF
18:49:47 QUICKLY.
18:49:48 PLEASE BEAR WITH ME.
18:49:59 IT IS PRETTY POOR TIMING, LITERALLY 30 SECONDS AGO.
18:50:03 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO QUICKLY GO THROUGH SOME OF THE
18:50:08 NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUE THAT ARE UNIQUE TO THIS SITE.
18:50:13 AS WE -- AS -- AS IT HAS BEEN PRESENTED, THE SITE HAS
18:50:16 AN UNIQUE HISTORY OF ALTERATION.
18:50:22 AND AS SUCH, THERE IS VERY DOMINANT INVASIVE SPECIES
18:50:23 COVERAGE ON THE SITE.
18:50:26 THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW SHOWING --
18:50:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN YOU BLOW THAT UP FOR US, RICK?
18:50:33 >> INVASIVE SPECIES.
18:50:36 THE YELLOW AND PINK ARE INVASIVE SPECIES.
18:50:41 ONLY GREEN SPECIES ON THE FRINGES AND A COUPLE SPOTTED
18:50:44 INTERNAL PLANTS ARE NATIVE.
18:50:48 SO THIS IS -- THIS IS A VIEW OF THE INVENTORY THAT
18:50:51 BETTER CAPTURES HOW MANY OF THE TREES ON-SITE ARE
18:50:51 PROTECTED.
18:50:58 REALLY ONLY TWO AREAS ON THE WEST AND ON THE SOUTHEAST.
18:51:01 ARE PROTECTED SPECIES.
18:51:06 THERE ARE NO GRAND TREES ON THE SITE CURRENTLY.
18:51:11 AND WE HAVE DONE CALCULATIONS FOR MITIGATION FOR THE
18:51:14 TREES THAT HAVE BEEN IMPACTED.
18:51:17 A WAIVER HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THE -- THOSE IMPACTS
18:51:21 BECAUSE WE ARE BUILDING -- THE RETENTION PERCENTAGE BUT
18:51:25 THE MAJORITY OF THE IMPACTS ARE FOR SABLE PALMS WHICH
18:51:36 ARE VERY EASY TO BE RELOCATED IF NECESSARY.
18:51:39 THERE, WE DISCUSSED A CANAL ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
18:51:43 PROPERTY NEAR SOUTHWEST 56TH STREET.
18:51:47 AND DELINEATED BY EPC.
18:51:52 NOT A WETLAND BUT ACCORDING TO CITY OF TAMPA, THE
18:51:55 WATERS THAT ARE OF S.W.F.W.M.D. ARE CONSIDERED WETLANDS
18:51:58 AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS FROM A NATURAL
18:51:59 RESOURCE PERSPECTIVE.
18:52:03 SO THE DRIVEWAY IMPACTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY EPC, THE
18:52:14 CONNECTING SECTIONS THAT ARE NEXT TO THE DRIVEWAYS NEED
18:52:17 TO BE ADDRESSED WITH THE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT
18:52:19 COMPENSATION.
18:52:22 IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THAT, WE HAVE PROVIDED A LIVING
18:52:27 SHORELINE DESIGN ALONG THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE --
18:52:32 OF THE WETLAND SETBACKS THAT INCLUDE NATIVE TREE
18:52:37 SPECIES, NATIVE SHRUBS AND NATIVE MARSH GRASSES THAT
18:52:39 WILL BE FURTHER DESIGNED ONCE THE FINAL GRADING IS
18:52:41 COMPLETED.
18:52:48 SO FINALLY, THE GREEN SPACE AND TREE COMMENTS THAT THE
18:52:51 NATURAL RESOURCE PROVIDED ARE A FUNCTION OF THE BALANCE
18:52:57 ASPECT OF THIS THAT RYAN -- THAT MR. MANASSE SPOKE TO
18:52:58 EARLIER.
18:53:01 AND AN INCREASE OF GREEN SPACE HAVE DIRECT TRADE-OFF OF
18:53:05 PARKING AND THIS APPLICATION RELIEF HAS BEEN REQUESTED
18:53:11 FOR BOTH OPPONENTS.
18:53:17 SO I THINK WE CAN PROVIDE WHERE WE CAN ENVIRONMENTALLY
18:53:17 --
18:53:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IF YOU HEAR US, 30 SECONDS.
18:53:24 >> INVASIVE SPECIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ALONG THE
18:53:28 NONTITLED MAN-MADE CANAL AND WHERE FEASIBLE SHADE TREE
18:53:34 PLANTING THROUGHOUT THE SITE TO OFFSET AND EXCEED
18:53:35 MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS.
18:53:37 AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
18:53:41 AND I HAND THE PRESENTATION BACK.
18:53:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE APPLICANTS HAD THEIR TIME.
18:53:47 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO TALK ON
18:53:48 THIS ITEM?
18:53:51 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC ON SECOND FLOOR TO TALK OF THIS
18:53:55 ITEM.
18:53:58 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, PLANNING AND GROWTH
18:53:58 MANAGEMENT.
18:54:02 NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK.
18:54:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE TO SPEAK.
18:54:09 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR ITEM 10.
18:54:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE ARE HEARING BOTH BUT VOTING ON
18:54:14 THEM SEPARATELY THOUGH.
18:54:18 WHO IS THAT PERSON IS REGISTERED.
18:54:45 >>CLERK: MICHAEL -- MR. MICHAEL MCCALL.
18:55:05 YOU NEED TO MUTE YOURSELF AND ENABLE YOUR VIDEO.
18:55:11 >> YES, MA'AM.
18:55:17 I HAVE NO COMMENT.
18:55:20 >>CLERK: HE SAID HE HAS NO COMMENT.
18:55:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO COMMENT?
18:55:25 WE WILL MOVE ON.
18:55:28 >>RYAN MANASSE: CHAIR, IF I COULD, RYAN MANASSE,
18:55:30 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:55:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.
18:55:34 >>RYAN MANASSE: REAL QUICK, IF COUNCIL MOVES THIS
18:55:37 FORWARD IF I CAN MAKE A NOTE PROCEDURALLY, CAN YOU
18:55:40 ENSURE THAT THE SECOND READING LINES UP BECAUSE I
18:55:48 BELIEVE THE CPA GOES LONGER AND WANT TO MAKE THAT NOTE.
18:55:52 >> CLERK, WHEN IS THE LAND USE?
18:55:55 >>CLERK: OCTOBER 21 AT 9:30.
18:55:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OCTOBER 21.
18:55:59 MR. MANASSE.
18:56:04 EXCUSE ME, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY ATTORNEY.
18:56:08 THERE WAS A DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER OF A
18:56:11 NOTE TO BE ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND I
18:56:16 DON'T KNOW IF YOU OR MISS WELLS MADE NOTE OF THAT.
18:56:20 AND IS THAT PART OF THE MOTION AND SHOULD WE READ IT.
18:56:24 AND A REVISION SHEET ASSOCIATED WITH THAT AND MR.
18:56:27 MECHANIK WHEN HE IS DONE IF THEY WILL AGREE TO THOSE
18:56:29 CHANGES DURING FIRST AND SECOND READING.
18:56:33 >>RYAN MANASSE: I BELIEVE THE NOTE OF MR. MECHANIK --
18:56:36 SO THE UNITS WILL NOT BE SEGREGATED TO AFFORDABLE
18:56:39 HOUSING UNIT.
18:56:41 SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
18:56:43 IF MR. MECHANIK.
18:56:46 >>DAVID MECHANIK: SOME OF THEM MAY BE -- I DON'T THINK
18:56:49 YOU CAN SAY THAT THEY WON'T -- SOME OF THEM MIGHT BE
18:56:51 TOGETHER.
18:56:54 I MEAN, YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO REQUIREMENT THAT SUGGESTED
18:56:59 24 UNITS BE NO CLOSER THAN FIVE UNIT TO EACH OTHER OR
18:57:01 SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
18:57:04 I THINK THE LANGUAGE IN THE AGREEMENT ALREADY ADDRESSES
18:57:05 THAT.
18:57:10 AND I THINK CATE SUGGESTED THAT WE WOULD TRANSPORT THAT
18:57:11 LANGUAGE TO THE SITE PLAN.
18:57:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT IS THE LANGUAGE IN THE
18:57:16 AGREEMENT SAY?
18:57:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT WILL COME BACK, COUNCILMAN, ON
18:57:21 THE 21ST.
18:57:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT HE MADE REFERENCE OF IT RIGHT
18:57:24 NOW.
18:57:25 >> SURE.
18:57:28 CATE WELLS, CITY ATTORNEY.
18:57:32 THE AGREEMENT PROPOSE AS THAT THE AGREEMENT WILL BE
18:57:36 INTEGRATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT DIDN'T
18:57:40 GET INTO DETAIL OF WHAT MR. MECHANIK IS SUGGESTING NOW
18:57:41 HOW CLOSE IT WOULD BE.
18:57:44 THE IDEA IS IT WOULDN'T ALL BE LOCATED IN ONE BUILDING
18:57:47 OR A PORTION OF ONE BUILDING.
18:57:51 THAT IT WILL BE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
18:57:55 AND IF COUNCIL -- YOU KNOW, IF COUNCIL IS INCLINED TO
18:57:59 APPROVE THE APPLICATION THIS EVENING, I CAN WORK WITH
18:58:01 RYAN MANASSE WITH THE LANGUAGE TO BE INCLUDED AS A
18:58:03 CONDITION ON THE SITE PLAN.
18:58:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER.
18:58:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I MEAN, I THINK EVERYBODY
18:58:11 UNDERSTANDS WHAT THE INTENT OF MY COMMENTS WERE.
18:58:14 AND I SAW A LOT OF NODS AROUND ME.
18:58:18 SO YOU ALL WORK TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN.
18:58:21 AND THIS WILL BE THE SHOWCASE -- THE SHOWCASE FIRST ONE
18:58:25 SO LET'S DO IT RIGHT.
18:58:29 >>RYAN MANASSE: TO ANSWER MR. SHELBY'S OTHER QUESTION,
18:58:34 YES, A SHEET IN THE OTHER MOTION.
18:58:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HOW MANY -- I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT
18:58:37 THE 10%.
18:58:42 THE SCATTERING UNITS -- HOW MANY --
18:58:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 240.
18:58:47 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THERE ARE THREE BUILDINGS.
18:58:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT'S A START.
18:58:51 >> 233 TOTAL UNITS.
18:58:53 24.
18:58:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 273 TOTAL.
18:58:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT IS A START FOR THE FIRST PROJECT
18:59:02 AND I HAVE A THING FOR 224 UNITS BUT GET 24.
18:59:04 IT IS A START, YOU KNOW.
18:59:05 ALL RIGHT.
18:59:08 MR. SHELBY, HOW SHOULD WE DO THIS.
18:59:12 MR. DINGFELDER TAPPED ME IN REFERENCE OF 10 GOING
18:59:13 BEFORE 4.
18:59:15 ARE WE CLOSING 4 AND MAKING A MOTION.
18:59:21 HOW ARE WE DOING THIS?
18:59:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE.
18:59:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
18:59:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IN FAVOR.
18:59:30 ANY OPPOSED?
18:59:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY: TAKE 4 WHICH IS THE VACATE.
18:59:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: VACATE FIRST.
18:59:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO, DO THE HONORS FOR
18:59:42 NUMBER 4, PLEASE.
18:59:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HE HAS THAT THROAT THING.
18:59:47 HE CAN PASS -- WE ARE GIVING YOU THE PASS.
18:59:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ARE YOU OKAY?
18:59:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I AM GOOD, I AM GOOD.
18:59:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HE SAID HE IS GOOD.
18:59:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
18:59:58 READING CONSIDERATION AN ORDINANCE VACATING CLOSING AND
19:00:01 DISCONTINUING THE PORTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALLEYWAY
19:00:07 LOCATED SOUTH OF LEE ROY SELMON CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY,
19:00:09 NORTH OF WASHINGTON STREET, EAST OF 56TH STREET AND
19:00:14 WEST OF THE TAMPA BYPASS CANAL WITHIN THE PLAT OF
19:00:17 THOMAS J. ROBERTS SIX MILE CREEK SUBDIVISION A
19:00:20 SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,
19:00:24 FLORIDA, AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HERE OF
19:00:27 SUBJECT TO CONCERN COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AN
19:00:28 RESTRICTIONS.
19:00:30 >> SECOND.
19:00:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:00:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:00:33 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:00:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:00:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
19:00:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:00:37 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:00:43 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19:00:51 READING AND OCTOBER 21.
19:01:00 >> PRESENTED ORDINANCE IN THE 302 SOUTH 56TH STREET IN THE
19:01:03 CITY OF TAMPA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED FROM ZONING
19:01:09 CLASSIFICATION RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD,
19:01:11 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING
19:01:13 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:01:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, INCLUDING THE REVISION
19:01:22 SHEET BY, MR. CARLSON, AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND THE
19:01:26 LANGUAGE THAT NORMALLY WE ADDRESS WITH REGARD TO THE
19:01:26 RECORD.
19:01:29 THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 10.
19:01:44 REZ-21-62.
19:01:47 >>BILL CARLSON: THAT THE -- I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT
19:01:50 THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND HAS
19:01:58 SUBMITTED COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT IT IS
19:02:01 COMPLIANT WITH APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
19:02:07 POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMPLIANCE WITH
19:02:17 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 21-136.
19:02:19 GUDES MR. CARLSON HAS MOVED IT.
19:02:21 ANY SECOND ON THAT.
19:02:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
19:02:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ROLL CALL.
19:02:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
19:02:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:02:27 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:02:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:02:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:02:32 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:02:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:02:35 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19:02:41 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON OCTOBER 21, 9:30 A.M.
19:02:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:02:45 ALL RIGHT.
19:02:45 THANK YOU.
19:02:48 OUR CLERK SAYS SHE HAS TO HAVE A BREAK.
19:11:59 SO WE WILL TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS.
19:12:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IS BACK IN
19:12:04 SESSION.
19:12:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
19:12:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.
19:12:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
19:12:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
19:12:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
19:12:20 >>CLERK: YOU HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
19:12:22 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU, ZANE HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT
19:12:23 COORDINATION.
19:12:30 ITEM NUMBER 3 CM21-21-51.
19:12:36 CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 19, 2021, 1740, 1742 WEST
19:12:40 SPRUCE STREET FROM RM-16 TO PD RESIDENTIAL
19:12:42 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
19:12:45 THE RESIDENT PROVIDED A REVISED SITE PLAN THAT WAS
19:12:48 DROPPED OFF AT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITH THE CHANGE
19:12:50 OF ADDED OF ONE PARKING SPACE.
19:12:53 I WILL NOW TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT, PIOTR
19:13:03 PACZKOWSKI, TO TALK ABOUT THE ELEVATIONS.
19:13:12 >> HELLO.
19:13:14 HELLO, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
19:13:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE CAN HEAR YOU.
19:13:23 >> MY NAME IS VIVIANA BERMUDEZ.
19:13:25 I WORK WITH PIOTR.
19:13:29 WE ARE OWNERS OF VP REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS.
19:13:31 I AM GOING TO BE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ON THIS
19:13:32 PROJECT.
19:13:35 AS ZANE MENTIONED, A CONTINUATION OF A HEARING FROM LAST
19:13:37 MONTH.
19:13:56 HOW CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN -- OKAY, THANK YOU.
19:14:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU NEED TO BE SWORN IN.
19:14:05 THE APPLICANT WAS SWORN IN.
19:14:09 >>CLERK: RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
19:14:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I HAVE BEEN ASKING ZANE THAT QUESTION
19:14:12 --
19:14:16 >>CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE
19:14:20 TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
19:14:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ZANE, IS THAT ALL YOUR PRESENTATION
19:14:24 FOR STAFF.
19:14:26 >>ZANE HUSAIN: YES, SIR, YES IT IS.
19:14:29 >>RYAN MANASSE: COUNCIL CHAIR, THIS IS RYAN MANASSE.
19:14:33 JUST TO CLARIFY WITH A CONTINUED CASE WE PROVIDED OUR
19:14:34 CASE AND FINDINGS.
19:14:38 THIS WAS A CASE THAT I BELIEVE COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER
19:14:40 AND OTHERS WERE TALKING OF CONTINUING TO LOOK AT THE
19:14:44 ELEVATION WITH OUR URBAN DESIGN SECTION WHICH I DO HAVE
19:14:45 ON FOR STAFF TONIGHT AS WELL.
19:14:53 BUT IN A SCENARIO WHERE IT IS A CONTINUED CASE.
19:14:58 WE DON'T REVIEW THE CASE AND ADDING A PARKING SPACE
19:15:01 WHICH IS A WAIVER BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:15:04 AND WANTED TO TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT AND TALK
19:15:06 ABOUT THE ELEVATIONS AND CONVERSATION WITH COUNCILMAN
19:15:11 DINGFELDER AT THE HEARING ABOUT THE MASSING AND SCALING
19:15:14 AND STUFF AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:15:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF I RECALL, THEY COULD BUILD THREE
19:15:18 UNITS AS A MATTER OF RIGHT.
19:15:21 AND THEY WERE ASKING FOR FOUR.
19:15:22 IS THAT RIGHT, RYAN?
19:15:24 >>RYAN MANASSE: THAT'S CORRECT, SIR.
19:15:27 AND COMING IN WITH A BONUS AS WELL.
19:15:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A BONUS TO GO FOUR OR FIVE?
19:15:33 >>RYAN MANASSE: FOUR.
19:15:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FOUR, OKAY.
19:15:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION MR.
19:15:40 MANASSE.
19:15:42 WE JUST SWORN THE APPLICANTS IN.
19:15:43 SO WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
19:15:48 >> THANK YOU.
19:16:07 SEE MY SCREEN AGAIN CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
19:16:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN'T SEE IT NOW, MA'AM.
19:16:20 >> OH, OKAY.
19:16:25 >> WHAT WE ARE CONCERNED IS OF TWO LOTS.
19:16:39 THERE IS A STREET -- THE TOTALITY PROPERTY 9490.
19:16:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I THINK WE LOST HER.
19:16:50 WE LOST HER.
19:16:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: COME BACK VIVIANA.
19:17:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE LOST YOU, AND NOW WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.
19:17:04 >> THIS APPLICATION WE ARE SEEKING APPROVAL FOR FOUR
19:17:08 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
19:17:14 WE ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE OF A
19:17:18 BONUS PROVISION ALLOWING 20 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:17:23 WE START WORKING WITH CATE WELLS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
19:17:29 ON THE BONUS PROVISION.
19:17:33 SO WE DID A LITTLE BIT OF WORK ABOUT THE DENSITY, WHAT
19:17:37 IS AROUND THE AREA ON THESE TWO LOTS.
19:17:41 SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY.
19:17:43 100 X 100.
19:17:47 THERE IS A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY AROUND THIS AREA AS WE
19:17:47 MENTIONED.
19:17:52 THERE IS A DUPLEX -- THERE ARE A LOT OF DUPLEXES, FOUR
19:17:52 UNITS.
19:17:56 AND RIGHT ON THE CORNER A FOUR-UNIT APARTMENT.
19:18:04 THE FRONT IS 62 FEET WITH A -- WITH 95 FEET.
19:18:06 THERE ARE A COUPLE MORE --
19:18:06 [INAUDIBLE]
19:18:16 -- AND PRETTY MUCH WE ARE SURROUNDED AROUND BY
19:18:17 MULTIFAMILY.
19:18:28 TALKING OF THE DENSITY OF THE MULTIFAMILY LOTS -- CAN
19:18:30 YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
19:18:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE IT.
19:18:32 >> OKAY.
19:18:32 THANK YOU.
19:18:35 SORRY.
19:18:40 SO WE START LOOKING AT THE DENSITY, AND RIGHT NOW, AS
19:18:42 I MENTIONED, WE CAN BUILD BETWEEN FOUR AND FIVE.
19:18:47 BUT WE ARE ALLOWING FOUR UNITS.
19:18:51 SO TOTAL DENSITY RIGHT NOW THE BUILDING RIGHT ON THE
19:18:55 CORNER THEY HAVE FOUR UNITS.
19:18:59 THEY HAVE TWO UNITS 0.1 ACRE.
19:19:03 SO WE DID DO A STUDY WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE DENSITY
19:19:04 IN THE AREA.
19:19:07 THERE ARE A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
19:19:14 AND WE ARE PRETTY MUCH ASKING WHAT -- COMPLIANT WITH
19:19:15 THE DENSITY OF THAT AREA.
19:19:23 ON THE RIGHT SIDE, YOU CAN SEE A HIGH DENSITY -- UNIT
19:19:28 APARTMENT FROM THE CITY HOUSING.
19:19:39 AND THE LOT -- A HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS.
19:19:43 SO THIS IS THE PROJECT.
19:19:51 WE HAVE TWO LOTS, TOTAL 100 X 100.
19:19:54 30 FOOT FROM THE FRONT, 21 FROM THE REAR AND THE SIDES
19:19:57 ARE 5.5.
19:20:02 WHAT WE WOULD LIKE IS PROVIDE A THREE-BEDROOM,
19:20:06 TWO-AND-A-HALF BATHROOM AND ONE CAR GARAGE PER UNIT.
19:20:11 AND THE GARAGE WILL BE ON THE ALLEY.
19:20:20 BASED ON THE COMMENTS WE RECEIVED LAST MONTH WE ADD AN
19:20:23 EXTRA PARKING LOT SO WE DON'T NEED -- FOR THE PARKING
19:20:25 LOT.
19:20:30 WE ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER --
19:20:30 [INAUDIBLE]
19:20:36 -- OF THE AISLE BETWEEN 24 TO 26 FEET.
19:20:44 THIS IS WHERE WE ARE LOCATED OF THE PARKING.
19:20:47 AND THIS IS WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING.
19:20:50 THIS IS THE FRONT VIEW OF THE BUILDING.
19:20:52 SO FOUR UNITS.
19:20:58 SO WE ARE NOT ASKING TO INCREASE ELEVATION.
19:21:01 IN OTHER WORDS, WE ARE NOT ASKING TO BUILD A BIGGER
19:21:02 BUILDING.
19:21:10 WE ARE ASKING TO LET US BUILD FOUR UNITS WITHIN THE
19:21:13 BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
19:21:18 SO THIS IS THE FRONT AND THE BACK.
19:21:21 AND AS YOU MENTIONED WE WERE ABLE TO HAVE ANOTHER
19:21:31 PARKING SO CAN REMOVE THE WAIVER FOR THE EXTRA PARKING.
19:21:36 THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE.
19:21:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:21:48 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
19:21:50 NO QUESTIONS?
19:21:52 ANYBODY TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
19:22:01 ITEM NUMBER 3?
19:22:04 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND
19:22:05 GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
19:22:08 NO ONE IS HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
19:22:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
19:22:11 ITEM.
19:22:14 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
19:22:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED TO CLOSE.
19:22:19 SECOND MR. DINGFELDER.
19:22:20 ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSED.
19:22:23 MOTION CARRIES.
19:22:24 MR. CITRO, NUMBER 3.
19:22:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
19:22:34 FOR REZ-21-51 AND FIRST MEETING AND SURVEY REZONE THE
19:22:40 PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1740 AND 1742 WEST
19:22:43 SPRUCE STREET CITY OF TAMPA FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY
19:22:46 DESCRIBED BY SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
19:22:52 CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY TO PD
19:22:55 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE FAMILY
19:22:57 ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:23:02 THE PETITIONER HAS MET A BURDEN OF PROOF OF THE
19:23:06 POLICIES AN GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH LAND
19:23:10 USE OBJECTIVE 9.2 TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS AN ADEQUATE
19:23:13 NUMBER OF LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL TO ACCOMMODATE.
19:23:18 SHALL I ALSO MOVE THE RESOLUTION AT THIS TIME.
19:23:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MARTIN SHELBY, NO, SIR.
19:23:25 THAT WILL BE AT THE SECOND READING.
19:23:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO HAS MOVED IT.
19:23:29 SECOND?
19:23:31 >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND.
19:23:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ROLL CALL VOTE.
19:23:34 YES.
19:23:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:23:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
19:23:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES --
19:23:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DINGFELDER SAYS MUCH
19:23:48 IMPROVED, YES.
19:23:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOW THAT IT IS MY TURN, YES.
19:23:52 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:23:57 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY SECOND READING
19:24:05 OCTOBER 21 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:24:07 ITEM NUMBER 6.
19:24:09 >>ZANE HUSAIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ZANE HUSAIN,
19:24:13 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, ITEM NUMBER 6 CASE AB
19:24:14 2-21-23.
19:24:18 THE PROPERTY 2201 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE --
19:24:21 >> EXCUSE ME, BEFORE WE GO INTO THE PRESENTATION.
19:24:24 WE RECEIVED A LETTER EXPRESSING SOME CONCERNS, AND WE
19:24:27 ONLY GOT THAT LATE TODAY AT ABOUT 3:30.
19:24:30 WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF THIS
19:24:39 HEARING SO WE CAN MEET WITH THE OBJECTORS ON THIS.
19:24:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:24:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: A DATE IN MIND, MR. MICHELINI.
19:24:52 THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 6?
19:24:52 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
19:24:56 YES, SIR, I THINK THAT THE -- STAFF HAS A DATE IN
19:24:58 JANUARY AVAILABLE.
19:25:01 BUT THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE TEN CASES.
19:25:04 SO YOU WOULD BE ADDING AN ADDITIONAL CASE.
19:25:07 THE FEBRUARY HEARING IS NOT AS FULL.
19:25:09 SO WE MAY NEED TO GO TO FEBRUARY.
19:25:13 AND WE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO REQUEST A WAIVER OF THE
19:25:20 180-DAY TIME PERIOD.
19:25:22 >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN MANASSE, LANDS DEVELOPMENT
19:25:23 COORDINATION.
19:25:31 WE WOULD BE OKAY WITH THE 2/24, 2022 FOR ALCOHOLIC
19:25:33 BEVERAGES.
19:25:35 WE HAVE SEVEN AVAILABLE SLOTS SO WOULDN'T HAVE TO EAT
19:25:40 INTO OUR CONTINUANCE AND WE WILL JUST MOVE THEM AND
19:25:42 HOLD A SPOT FOR THAT.
19:25:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHAT IS THE DATE.
19:25:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: 2/24.
19:25:48 >>RYAN MANASSE: 2022.
19:25:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI BROUGHT MATERIAL UP TO
19:25:55 THE THIRD FLOOR AS DID SOMEBODY WHO IS ALSO HERE TO
19:25:55 SPEAK.
19:25:58 IF THIS IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED, I WILL WALK THESE
19:26:01 BACK DOWN TO THE SECOND FLOOR SO THESE PEOPLE CAN TAKE
19:26:02 BACK THIS MATERIAL.
19:26:05 IF THAT IS OKAY, IF THAT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE.
19:26:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT WILL BE FINE, SIR.
19:26:09 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
19:26:12 I APOLOGIZE TO COUNCIL, BUT WE WERE ONLY PROVIDED BY
19:26:16 THAT LETTER LATE THIS AFTERNOON AND HAVE NOT HAD AN
19:26:19 OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS IT OR EXAMINE IT WITH THE
19:26:23 PREPARERS OF THE LETTER.
19:26:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY MR.
19:26:27 MANISCALCO.
19:26:29 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:26:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST PROCEDURALLY, MR. SHELBY.
19:26:36 I HEARD -- AILEEN SAID THERE WERE SIX PEOPLE
19:26:37 DOWNSTAIRS.
19:26:39 I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WERE HERE FOR THIS.
19:26:42 I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO SPEAK FOR A
19:26:44 CONTINUANCE REQUEST IF THEY ARE HERE.
19:26:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THEY WISH TO -- COUNCIL HAS PAST
19:26:49 IF IT WAS LIVE AND PRESENT.
19:26:51 I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY IS ON LINE.
19:26:54 BUT TO SPEAK ONLY TO THE CONTINUANCE IF THAT IS
19:26:57 COUNCIL'S PLEASURE, THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AND THEY
19:27:02 MAY CHOOSE TO OR MAY CHOOSE NOT TO.
19:27:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AILEEN, ANYBODY HERE ON THE ITEM?
19:27:10 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I WILL SURRENDER THE PODIUM.
19:27:11 >> THANKS, STEVE.
19:27:15 YES -- YES, THERE ARE EIGHT PEOPLE -- ACTUALLY NINE
19:27:18 PEOPLE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AND SOME OF THEM
19:27:22 ARE DONATING TIME AND THEY DO REALIZE THAT --
19:27:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THEY WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON
19:27:25 THE CONTINUANCE.
19:27:28 THEY CAN'T TALK ON THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ITEM.
19:27:30 ONLY ABOUT THE CONTINUANCE.
19:27:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU WILL ADVISE THEM THAT, AILEEN, THAT
19:27:35 WOULD BE GREAT.
19:27:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IN THE MEAN TIME, I WILL GO
19:27:45 DOWNSTAIRS AS WELL.
19:27:48 >> COUNCIL, CHAIR, ZANE HUSSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:27:53 IF THE CONTINUANCE IS APPROVED, I WANT TO ANNOTATE THE
19:27:54 TIME THAT YOU WANTED TO.
19:27:59 WE ARE DOING 5:01 P.M. BUT GOING INTO THE NEW YEAR AS
19:28:03 WELL, FYI.
19:28:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T THINK WE HAVE MADE THE
19:28:09 DECISION YET.
19:28:13 >> COUNCIL WILL HAVE TO MAKE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES
19:28:16 TO GO PAST JANUARY 2022.
19:28:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE WILL HEAR FROM THE FOLKS OF THE
19:28:19 CONTINUANCE.
19:28:22 YOU CAN ONLY SPEAK OF THE CONTINUANCE AND INTO OTHER
19:28:25 SUBJECT MATTER OPINION ONLY THE CONTINUANCE.
19:28:26 >> YES, SIR, MR. CHAIR.
19:28:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR.
19:28:30 STATE YOUR NAME FOR US.
19:28:34 >> YES, THANK YOU, JOHN DIX WITH THE ACKERMAN LAW FIRM
19:28:37 AND I REPRESENT METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES, AND I RISE THIS
19:28:41 OPPOSITION TO THE REQUESTED CONTINUANCE JUST ON TWO
19:28:42 GROUNDS.
19:28:47 FIRST, WE HAVE AS YOU HEARD A MINUTE AGO EIGHT PEOPLE
19:28:52 WHO HAVE COME TO VOICE THEIR OBJECTION AND THEY HAVE
19:28:56 BEEN HERE FOR TWO AND A HALF HOURS AND CARVED OUT TIME
19:29:00 FROM THEIR BUSY SCHEDULE TO COME TO ADDRESS THIS.
19:29:03 HAS GOT TO BE CONTINUED ON DECENT GROUNDS AND ALL WE
19:29:05 HEARD IS A MYSTERIOUS LETTER THAT WAS RECEIVED THIS
19:29:06 AFTERNOON.
19:29:08 WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE LETTER IS FROM OR ANYTHING ABOUT
19:29:11 THE LETTER JUST THERE WAS A MYSTERIOUS LETTER.
19:29:15 THE OTHER REASON FOR THE OBJECTION THOUGH, MR.
19:29:20 CHAIRMAN, IS MORE ALARMING.
19:29:26 IF THIS -- THE COUNCIL MAY NOT KNOW, WE CERTAINLY
19:29:33 DIDN'T KNOW UNTIL RECENTLY, THAT THE APPLICANT IS, AT
19:29:39 PRESENT, SERVING ALCOHOL TO THE PUBLIC ON-SITE.
19:29:44 IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY ZONING AUTHORITY TO DO THAT TO
19:29:46 ANYBODY'S KNOWLEDGE.
19:29:51 SO IF THIS IS CONTINUED, IT SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITH A
19:29:54 CONTINUE THAT THE APPLICANT NOT BE ABLE TO SERVE
19:29:57 ALCOHOL TO THE PUBLIC FOR AS LONG AS THE APPLICATION IS
19:30:01 PENDING.
19:30:03 I PROVIDED MATERIALS TO THE COUNCIL.
19:30:07 THEY ARE IN A BLACK BINDER, BUT I CAN ALSO USE THE ELMO
19:30:11 HERE AND QUOTE TO YOU FROM --
19:30:14 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THIS EVIDENCE?
19:30:16 >> IT IS EVIDENCE.
19:30:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: TOWARD WHAT END, SIR?
19:30:21 >> EVIDENCE TO THE FACT THAT THE APPLICANT IS SERVING
19:30:25 ALCOHOL ON PREMISE WITHOUT AUTHORITY, AND IF -- IF WE
19:30:29 ROLL THE CONTINUANCE FOR 90 DAYS, THEY WILL CONTINUE TO
19:30:31 SERVE ALCOHOL ON THE PREMISE WITHOUT --
19:30:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANASSE?
19:30:41 >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, COUNCIL.
19:30:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM LOOKING AT THIS ADDRESS.
19:30:46 I'M PRETTY GOOD AND FAMILIAR WITH ADDRESSES.
19:30:49 MAYBE YOU CAN LOOK AT THAT ADDRESS BECAUSE I AM KIND OF
19:30:52 ALARMED IF THIS GENTLEMAN IS MAKING AN ALLEGATION THAT
19:30:54 THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS WHICH IS ALREADY BEEN
19:30:58 OPERATING, WHICH I KNOW SERVES ALCOHOL, WHY ARE THEY
19:31:01 ASKING FOR AN ALCOHOL LICENSE.
19:31:03 I AM CONFUSED, SIR.
19:31:06 >>RYAN MANASSE: THAT WOULD BE AN ALCOHOL ENFORCEMENT
19:31:07 ISSUE, SIR.
19:31:10 WHAT STAFF HAS PRESENTED AND READY TO PRESENT IS A
19:31:15 PETITION FOR AN APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL AB ZONING.
19:31:20 I PROBABLY WILL HAVE SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ JUMP ON.
19:31:28 IT WILL BE AN APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT AS WITH THE
19:31:29 STATE.
19:31:31 SPEAKING WITH THE STAFF REPORT THERE, STAFF IS NOT
19:31:37 AWARE OF ANY AB PERMIT FOR THE SAID LOCATION AND SHOULD
19:31:40 NOT BE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION.
19:31:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WELL, MR. DINGFELDER -- I JUST
19:31:45 HAPPENED TO LOOK AT THIS ADDRESS.
19:31:48 AND I KNOW THIS ADDRESS VERY WELL.
19:31:53 BECAUSE -- I GOT SOME QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW, MR. SHELBY.
19:31:56 IF SOMEONE IS APPLYING FOR AN APPLICATION AND ALCOHOL
19:32:00 ALREADY BEING SERVED IN THIS ESTABLISHMENT, AND THEY
19:32:03 HAD A GRAND OPENING THERE AND EVERYTHING AND THEY HAVE
19:32:06 BEEN OPEN FOR A WHILE, I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT
19:32:10 LEGALLY HOW WE NEED TO PROCEED WITH THIS BECAUSE I KNOW
19:32:13 THAT ALCOHOL IS SERVED THERE.
19:32:15 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MY SUGGESTION -- MY SUGGESTION, MR.
19:32:19 CHAIR, IS HOLD THAT IN ABEYANCE AND LISTEN TO ALL THE
19:32:23 SPEAKERS AND WE WILL -- IN THE MEANTIME, WE CAN -- WE
19:32:25 CAN CIRCLE AROUND AND BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT.
19:32:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ON YOUR ADVISEMENT, SIR.
19:32:30 WE WILL CONTINUE, SIR.
19:32:35 >> WITHIN WHAT, COUNCILMAN, WITH DELIBERATION ABOUT THE
19:32:36 MOTION.
19:32:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ABOUT THE CONTINUANCE.
19:32:38 >> YES, THANK YOU, SIR.
19:32:43 ON THE ELMO WE HAVE A SCREEN SHOT OF THE WEB SITE FROM
19:32:45 GRAND CATHEDRAL.
19:32:46 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.
19:32:50 AND, AGAIN, IT IS IN YOUR PACKET AT TAB TWO --
19:32:52 >>STEVE MICHELINI: EXCUSE ME, COUNCIL, WE ARE BEYOND
19:32:56 THE INFORMATION THAT WAS REQUESTED REGARDING THE
19:32:56 CONTINUANCE.
19:32:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WOULD AGREE.
19:32:59 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THEY ARE PRESENTING EVIDENCE AND
19:33:01 ALREADY STARTED PRESENTING EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT
19:33:04 PERTINENT TO THE REQUEST FOR THE CONTINUANCE.
19:33:07 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IN THAT CASE, SIR, IF YOU COULD JUST
19:33:11 TALK TO THE CONTINUANCE WITHOUT PRESENTING ANY
19:33:12 EVIDENCE.
19:33:13 >> UNDERSTOOD.
19:33:18 MY OBJECTION TO THE CONTINUANCE IF IT IS CONTINUED IT
19:33:20 SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITH CONDITIONS THAT THE APPLICANT
19:33:23 NOT TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE SERVING ALCOHOL WHICH IS
19:33:27 WHAT THE APPLICATION IS ALL ABOUT.
19:33:31 IF THIS IS CONTINUED, THE SERVING OF ALCOHOL MUST STOP
19:33:32 UNTIL THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED.
19:33:34 SO THAT IS OUR OBJECTION.
19:33:39 THANK YOU.
19:33:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU HAVE THE QUESTION.
19:33:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WAS GOING TO TELL MR. DIX A
19:33:51 GOOD-LOOKING GUY, NOT AS GOOD-LOOKING AS HIS FATHER.
19:33:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, I HAVE SOME CONCERNS
19:33:53 HERE.
19:33:57 I DON'T KNOW LEGALLY -- WITH MISS WELLS -- I HAVE
19:34:02 CONCERN IF WE ARE GOING TO HEAR IT, WE MAY END YOU HAVE
19:34:05 HEARING EVIDENTIAL SITUATION AND I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT
19:34:08 THIS PARTICULAR PLACE SERVES ALCOHOL AND I AM CONCERNED
19:34:12 TO CONTINUE WITH THIS AT THIS POINT.
19:34:17 MISS SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ.
19:34:23 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I WILL ECHO MARTY'S COMMENTS
19:34:26 THAT WE JUST DEAL WITH THE CONTINUANCE AT THIS POINT IN
19:34:26 TIME.
19:34:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OF COURSE, WHAT YOU HEARD, COUNCIL,
19:34:33 WITHOUT HEARING SPECIFIC EVIDENCE.
19:34:35 YOU HEARD AN ALLEGATION AND MAYBE SOMETHING THAT MR.
19:34:37 MICHELINI WILL ADDRESS WHEN HE COMES BACK.
19:34:41 BECAUSE YOU STILL -- COUNCIL STILL HAS TO FIND
19:34:46 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO GO BEYOND THE 180 DAYS.
19:34:50 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GO AHEAD.
19:34:52 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
19:34:57 BRIAN SEEL, 313 WEST PARK AVENUE AND PRESIDENT OF THE
19:35:00 TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD
19:35:05 ASSOCIATION IN WHICH THIS PROPERTY EXISTS AND I AM
19:35:07 AGAINST THE CONTINUANCE ON A PERSONAL BASIS.
19:35:11 OUR CIVIC ASSOCIATION HAS NOT BEEN AFFORDED THE
19:35:14 OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE A POSITION ON THIS.
19:35:17 AND WHILE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT I AM SAYING MAY COME
19:35:21 OFF AS SOUNDING LIKE A CONTINUANCE IS WARRANTED, I DO
19:35:23 NOT BELIEVE IT IS BECAUSE THE APPLICANT, AS WELL AS
19:35:27 THEIR AGENT, KNOWS BETTER OF HOW PUBLIC NOTICE AND
19:35:29 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WORKS.
19:35:33 THAT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IS, IN MY OPINION AND IN THE
19:35:36 OPINION OF SEVERAL OTHER BOARD MEMBERS WAS NOT DONE
19:35:37 PROPERLY.
19:35:40 AND ALCOHOL ZONING, WET ZONING OF A PROPERTY IS A
19:35:44 SENSITIVE ISSUE ESPECIALLY WHEN IT BACKS UP TO ADJACENT
19:35:45 NEIGHBORS.
19:35:48 I HAVE HAD TO SCRAMBLE SINCE LEARNING ABOUT THIS WITHIN
19:35:52 THE PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS AND TRY TO DO THEIR PUBLIC
19:35:54 ENGAGEMENT FOR THEM.
19:35:59 THEY HAVE NOT MET THAT BURDEN OF HEARING OUT THEIR
19:36:02 NEIGHBORS AND EXISTING COMPLAINTS THAT WERE
19:36:05 MISREPRESENTED TO ME AND I BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE
19:36:09 FAILED AT THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND DOES NOT WARRANT A
19:36:13 CONTINUANCE BECAUSE THEY HAD THE TIME TO DO IT.
19:36:18 WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
19:36:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
19:36:29 >>CLERK: THAT IS THE LAST PERSON FROM THE PUBLIC THAT
19:36:32 WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
19:36:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MICHELINI, WOULD YOU LIKE TO
19:36:35 REBUT?
19:36:36 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
19:36:41 WE JUST BECAME AWARE THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE
19:36:42 METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES HAD AN OBJECTION.
19:36:46 I JUST RECEIVED THAT LETTER AT 3:30 THIS AFTERNOON.
19:36:49 AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH
19:36:51 THEM AND ADDRESS THE ISSUE.
19:36:55 I MEAN, THEY CLEARLY -- THEY WERE INSTRUCTED NOT TO
19:36:59 PLACE INFORMATION IN THE RECORD REGARDING THIS.
19:37:02 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ADDRESS THAT, BUT NOT PART OF THIS
19:37:03 CONTINUANCE.
19:37:07 I THINK THAT WE -- WE DESERVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET
19:37:11 WITH THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION AND TO MEET WITH THE
19:37:16 METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES REPRESENTATIVE TO DISCUSS THEIR
19:37:17 CONCERNS.
19:37:20 AND IF YOU HAD A DATE EARLIER THAT WOULD BE FINE, BUT
19:37:30 CITY COUNCIL DOESN'T HAVE A DATE WITHIN 180 DAYS.
19:37:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY -- MISS VELEZ, YOU MAY WANT
19:37:36 TO CHIME IN.
19:37:39 MR. MICHELINI IS ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE, BUT I KNOW
19:37:41 SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THIS COUNCIL KNOW THIS PARTICULAR
19:37:45 ADDRESS AND MY CONCERN IS, GRANTING A CONTINUANCE AND I
19:37:47 KNOW THIS PARTICULAR ESTABLISHMENT SERVES ALCOHOL.
19:37:51 I AM KIND OF -- I DON'T -- I DON'T -- I AM KIND OF
19:37:53 WORRIED ABOUT THAT.
19:37:55 >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. CHAIRMAN, LET ME TELL YOU --
19:37:58 LET ME JUST SAY THIS FOR THE RECORD, THAT ALCOHOL THAT
19:38:01 IS BEING SERVED THERE IS BEING SERVED THERE LEGALLY.
19:38:08 IT IS NOT AN ABRIDGEMENT OF ANY CITY OR STATE
19:38:09 REGULATION.
19:38:12 AND IT CAN ONLY GO ON FOR A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME.
19:38:16 SO IT'S -- IT IS REGULATED BY A CATERING LICENSE AS
19:38:19 OPPOSED TO AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ZONING THAT WILL BE
19:38:20 PERMANENT.
19:38:23 AND THAT IS THE REASON WE ARE BEFORE THE COUNCIL TO
19:38:31 MAKE A PERMANENT ZONING APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY.
19:38:33 BUT ANYWAY, AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO BE TESTIFYING
19:38:37 REGARDING CURRENT CONDITIONS OTHER THAN THE FACT WE
19:38:38 NEED TIME.
19:38:40 DO YOU NOT HAVE ANOTHER HEARING DATE AVAILABLE WITHIN
19:38:43 180 DAYS.
19:38:49 THE EARLIEST DATE YOU HAVE AVAILABLE IS JANUARY 27.
19:38:50 YOU ALREADY HAVE TEN CASES.
19:38:54 AND FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I THINK THAT IT WARRANTS THE
19:38:55 ADDITIONAL TIME.
19:38:57 WE HAVE HOLIDAYS COMING UP.
19:39:00 AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE THE TIME TO SIT DOWN AND
19:39:03 DISCUSS THE OPPORTUNITIES AND THE OBJECTIONS THAT ARE
19:39:05 BEING RAISED.
19:39:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:39:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:39:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
19:39:11 I BELIEVE -- IF THERE ARE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WISH TO
19:39:15 SPEAK, MISS ROSARIo, ANY OTHER PEOPLE --
19:39:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT WAS IT.
19:39:18 >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO ONE ELSE.
19:39:20 >>CLERK: THERE IS ONE MORE PERSON.
19:39:26 HE JUST CAME UP.
19:39:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: STATE YOUR NAME, SIR.
19:39:33 >> TIM MARX, AND I SERVE AS THE PRESIDENT AND CEO OF
19:39:34 METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES.
19:39:36 AND MY OBJECTION WOULD BE A CONTINUANCE WITHOUT A
19:39:40 RESTRICTION OF ALCOHOL SALES PUTS OUR 100 FAMILIES AND
19:39:42 200 CHILDREN AT RISK.
19:39:44 WE HAVE A SCHOOL ACROSS THE STREET.
19:39:48 WE HAVE AN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER THAT IS
19:39:54 KITTY CORNER AND HAVE 100 FAMILIES WITHIN THE 150
19:39:57 BOUNDARY SETBACK.
19:40:01 SOMETHING OF THIS LARGE VENUE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC DURING
19:40:03 THIS CONTINUANCE WILL BE A RISK TO OUR FAMILIES.
19:40:06 THAT IS THE NATURE OF MY OBJECTION.
19:40:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION.
19:40:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:40:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GENTLEMEN, WHY -- I MISSED YOUR
19:40:15 NAME, I APOLOGIZE.
19:40:17 YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET.
19:40:20 DID YOU GET NOTICE ABOUT THIS HEARING?
19:40:21 >> YES.
19:40:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU GOT WRITTEN NOTICE?
19:40:26 >> YES.
19:40:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WERE YOU ABLE TO REACH OUT TO THE
19:40:33 APPLICANT OR DO YOU KNOW IF THAT OCCURRED?
19:40:37 >> WE HAD A PREVIOUS AGREEMENT REGARDING PARKING WHICH
19:40:39 I TERMINATED BACK IN MAY.
19:40:44 AND WE WERE NOT IN FAVOR OF SEEING THAT CIGAR BAR
19:40:45 EX-AND IT.
19:40:49 AND THEY WERE A-- EXPAND, AND THEY WERE AWARE OF THAT.
19:40:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEY WERE AWARE OF THAT?
19:40:52 >> YES.
19:40:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO YOU ARE IN COMMUNICATION
19:40:56 PROBABLY EVEN PRIOR TO THE NOTICE IS WHAT YOU ARE
19:40:56 SAYING?
19:41:01 >> YES, AS IT RELATES USING OUR FACILITIES FOR PARKING.
19:41:03 SPECIFICALLY.
19:41:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
19:41:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO.
19:41:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SURE, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU,
19:41:10 PLEASE.
19:41:14 YOU SAY YOU HAD KNOWLEDGE OF THIS CIGAR BAR SINCE MAY.
19:41:15 >> YES.
19:41:17 EVEN BEFORE THEN.
19:41:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND YOU ASKED NOTHING OF THE CITY AND
19:41:23 EVERYBODY ELSE WHY THEY WERE SERVING ALCOHOL WITHOUT AN
19:41:24 ALCOHOL LICENSE?
19:41:26 >> I THOUGHT THEY HAD A LICENSE.
19:41:29 WHEN I MET WITH THEM, I WAS SHOWN ALL THESE
19:41:30 FACILITIES.
19:41:33 AND ILLUSTRATED TO ME THIS WAS A PRIVATE CLUB.
19:41:36 THAT IT WASN'T GOING TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
19:41:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SAITH PRIVATE CLUB?
19:41:39 >> THAT IS WHAT I WAS TOLD.
19:41:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEFORE WE GO INTO THAT.
19:41:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I JUST WANTED TO GET THE TIMELINE
19:41:44 DOWN.
19:41:45 THAT'S ALL.
19:41:46 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
19:41:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SORRY TO INTERRUPT.
19:41:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
19:41:56 >> MR. SHELBY, AS -- AS MR. GUDES SAID -- AS CHAIR
19:42:00 GUDES SAID, SEVERAL OF US I THINK HAVE BEEN THERE AND
19:42:01 HAD CIGARS.
19:42:04 I DID NOT DRINK ALCOHOL THERE AND I AM NOT SURE IF
19:42:07 ALCOHOL WAS SERVED BUT HAVING -- I HAVE BEEN THERE
19:42:09 THREE TIMES TO HAVE A CIGAR.
19:42:10 IS THAT A CONFLICT.
19:42:12 CAN I VOTE ON THAT?
19:42:15 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT IS A SITE VISIT AND THE QUESTION
19:42:15 IS --
19:42:17 [LAUGHTER]
19:42:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AN OFFICIAL SITE VISIT.
19:42:23 >>MARTIN SHELBY: PERHAPS -- PERHAPS MORE IN-DEPTH THAN
19:42:25 -- THAN OTHERS PERHAPS.
19:42:29 BUT A SITE VISIT NONETHELESS, AND CERTAINLY -- I THINK
19:42:35 THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DISCLOSED ON THE RECORD, BUT I
19:42:39 THINK ONE WOULD BE -- AN INQUIRY WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE
19:42:43 REGARDING THAT BECAUSE -- BECAUSE FAILURE TO DISCLOSE A
19:42:45 SITE VISIT COULD BE CONSIDERED AN EX-PARTE
19:42:50 COMMUNICATION OR PREJUDICIAL TO GIVE BOTH SIDES, THE
19:42:54 APPLICANT AND ANYBODY WHO IS OPPOSED WHO -- WHO IS AN
19:42:57 AFFECTED PARTY THE ABILITY TO ADDRESS THAT.
19:43:00 SO, YES, THAT IS THE CASE.
19:43:07 >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I VOTE ON THE CONTINUANCE OR NOT?
19:43:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, SOMEBODY IS GOING TO HAVE TO.
19:43:13 YOU WILL HAVE AT LEAST FOUR -- YOU WILL HAVE AT LEAST
19:43:16 FOUR TO HAVE A CONTINUANCES.
19:43:19 AND I AM AFRAID TO ASK MAYBE AT THIS POINT IN TIME WHO
19:43:21 IS --
19:43:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCIL, I LIVED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA
19:43:28 FOR 40 YEARS, CAN I VOTE ON THIS?
19:43:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY: LET ME JUST SAY THIS, COUNCIL.
19:43:34 THIS IS VERY UNUSUAL AND A LOT OF ISSUES HERE.
19:43:38 BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER, IF THAT IS THE LAST SPEAKER,
19:43:41 MR. MICHELINI TALKED OF THE LETTER RECEIVED THAT WAS
19:43:45 THE BASIS OF THE REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE AND IF HE IS
19:43:47 WILLING TO SHARE THAT WITH MORE SPECIFICITY THAN
19:43:51 COUNCIL CAN AT LEAST WEIGH ALL THE FACTS IT HAS BEFORE
19:43:51 IT.
19:43:54 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, COUNCIL.
19:43:57 THE LETTER WAS FROM METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES SIGNED BY
19:43:58 ANDY MAY.
19:44:02 AND I THINK -- ALTHOUGH -- I WAS A LITTLE SURPRISED AT
19:44:05 THE ATTORNEY WHEN I SHOWED HIM -- HE SAID HE KNEW ABOUT
19:44:06 THE LETTER.
19:44:08 IT WASN'T A MYSTERIOUS LETTER.
19:44:11 THEY KNEW ABOUT IT AND THEY SAID THEY HAD OBJECTIONS TO
19:44:12 THE LARGE VENUE.
19:44:15 AND AS I SAID TO YOU, I GOT THIS AT 3:30 THIS
19:44:16 AFTERNOON.
19:44:19 THEY HAD PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY REACH OUT TO US
19:44:24 PREVIOUSLY AS ONE OF THE SPEAKERS ALREADY SAID, BUT
19:44:28 THEY DIDN'T DONE THAT AND ONLY SPOKE OF PARKING.
19:44:32 THEY DIDN'T SPEAK OF CONCERN OVERALL OF A WET ZONING.
19:44:34 SO I AM JUST SAYING WE NEED AN OPPORTUNITY TO SIT DOWN
19:44:35 AND TALK ABOUT IT.
19:44:38 WE MAY NOT COME TO ANY RESOLUTION TO IT, BUT WE DESERVE
19:44:41 THE TIME TO SIT DOWN AND DISCUSS IT.
19:44:43 AND I KNOW THAT SOME OF THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THIS
19:44:51 COMPANY REACHED OUT TO RYAN SEEL -- SEEL, EXCUSE ME.
19:44:53 THEY HAD A MEETING AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HEARD
19:44:55 THAT HE HAS A CONCERN.
19:44:59 HE TALKED TO ME OF REACHING OUT TO THE HOMEOWNER
19:45:03 ASSOCIATION AND GAVE US TIME TO TALK ABOUT THIS AND
19:45:04 WHAT IS GOING ON.
19:45:07 LET ME ENSURE THAT YOU THERE IS NO ILLEGAL SALE OF
19:45:09 ALCOHOL THAT OCCURS AT THIS SITE.
19:45:13 WE NEED THE TIME TO MAKE THIS A PERMANENT REZONING FOR
19:45:14 ALCOHOL.
19:45:18 AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR A
19:45:19 CONTINUANCE.
19:45:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY
19:45:22 COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
19:45:30 MY SUGGESTION IS TO HOLD THIS ITEM UNTIL THE END AND
19:45:32 THE PARTIES ARE THERE AND THEY CAN TALK ABOUT EXACTLY
19:45:35 WHERE AND HOW TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT AND MR.
19:45:39 MICHELINI CAN EXPLAIN THE BASIS FOR HIS DIFFERENCE OF
19:45:41 OPINION WITH REGARD TO THE SALE OF ALCOHOL AND PERHAPS
19:45:44 THERE CAN BE AN ACCOMMODATION IN THE MEANTIME.
19:45:47 I WILL DISCUSS THIS WITH --
19:45:49 >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. SHELBY, I DON'T THINK WE WILL
19:45:51 RESOLVE THIS IN FIVE OR TEN MINUTES.
19:45:54 THIS WILL REQUIRE TIME.
19:45:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, I AGREE WITH MR.
19:45:59 MICHELINI.
19:46:03 THERE ARE SOME CONCERNS AND SOME CONCERNS -- AND ON THE
19:46:06 FACES OF SOME OF THE COUNCILMEMBERS HERE AS WELL.
19:46:09 HEARING CERTAIN THINGS AND WE DON'T WANT TO BE CAUGHT
19:46:12 IN A SITUATION THAT WE DON'T REALLY KNOW OR HAVE
19:46:12 INFORMATION ABOUT.
19:46:16 THAT IS WHY I AM ASKING IF WE CONTINUE THIS TO MOVE
19:46:25 FORWARD, MAYBE MR. MANASSE NEEDS TO CONTACT TPD AND
19:46:29 MAKE SURE THIS IS ON THE UP AND UP AND MAKE SURE THAT
19:46:33 WE ARE NOT DOING SOMETHING WE SHOULDN'T BE DOING.
19:46:41 >>RYAN MANASSE: COUNCIL CHAIR, RYAN MANASSE, LAND
19:46:41 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:46:44 WITHOUT GOING INTO THE DETAILS OF THE CASE AND WITH
19:46:48 MICHELINI, HE REFERENCED A CATERING LICENSE.
19:46:50 IT IS NOT LICENSED BY THE STATE.
19:46:54 SO, YOU KNOW, IT COULD BE LEGAL THROUGH THAT MECHANISM.
19:46:57 I CAN'T SAY THAT FOR SURE, BUT I CAN SAY I CAN LOOK
19:47:01 INTO IT WITH MY STAFF, WITH MY ENFORCEMENT SIDE.
19:47:04 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: MR. CHAIR, SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ,
19:47:06 LEGAL DEPARTMENT AGAIN.
19:47:11 THE QUESTION BEFORE COUNCIL IS IF MR. MICHELINI
19:47:14 PRESENTED EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH WOULD EXTEND
19:47:18 THE HEARING DATE BEYOND THE JANUARY 2 DATE.
19:47:22 I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OTHER DATES ARE AVAILABLE BUT TO
19:47:25 EXTEND BEYOND JANUARY 2 WOULD YOU HAVE TO FIND
19:47:28 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES BASED ON THE APPLICANT'S
19:47:30 STATEMENTS THIS WEEKEND.
19:47:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEYOND WHICH DATE, MISS
19:47:36 JOHNSON-VELEZ?
19:47:39 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: JANUARY 2.
19:47:43 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEAR WITH ME, WHAT IS AVAILABLE ON
19:47:45 OCTOBER 28?
19:47:47 >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN MANASSE, LAND DEVELOPMENT
19:47:48 COORDINATION.
19:47:55 TEN CASES -- WE CONTINUED ONE CASE EARLIER TO 10/28.
19:47:57 LET ME LOOK AT MY --
19:48:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT IS A SHORT ENOUGH TIME.
19:48:06 >>RYAN MANASSE: OCTOBER 28 WOULD BE TEN CASES.
19:48:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF IT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO
19:48:12 EXPEDITE WITHOUT OBJECTION TO MR. MICHELINI THIS CAN BE
19:48:15 ADDED TO OCTOBER 28 AND STAFF WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT TIME
19:48:19 TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THOSE QUESTIONS AND THE
19:48:22 APPLICANT, MR. MICHELINI, WILL BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE
19:48:25 CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED IN THE LETTER HE GOT TODAY.
19:48:27 AND ALSO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED BY THE
19:48:30 PEOPLE WHO WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS GOING ON FOR AN
19:48:37 EXTENDED CONTINUANCE.
19:48:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP,
19:48:41 SIR.
19:48:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BASED UPON EVERYTHING THAT I HEARD
19:48:45 TONIGHT FROM THE PETITIONER, AND WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO
19:48:50 THE FOLKS AND APOLOGIES FOR THE COUPLE OF HOURS OF
19:48:53 WAIT, I AM GOING TO GO AHEAD TO MOVE TO CONTINUE THIS
19:48:57 UNTIL OCTOBER 28 WITH -- WITH DIRECT -- WITH DIRECTION
19:49:01 AND ENCOURAGEMENT TO THE PETITIONER TO MEET FACE TO
19:49:05 FACE OR ANY SAFE WAY POSSIBLE WITH THE FOLKS IN THAT
19:49:08 COMMUNITY, INCLUDING METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES AND THE
19:49:10 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND ANYBODY ELSE THAT MIGHT
19:49:15 WANT TO PARTICIPATE.
19:49:18 SO STEVEN, THAT WILL BE THE FIRST QUESTION OUT OF MY
19:49:21 MOUTH WHEN YOU COME BACK ON THE 28TH IS WHAT KIND OF
19:49:23 MEETING OR MEETINGS YOU HAD WITH THESE PEOPLE.
19:49:25 SO ANYWAY, THAT IS MY MOTION.
19:49:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION ON THE FLOOR FROM MR.
19:49:28 DINGFELDER.
19:49:30 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
19:49:32 ALL IN FAVOR.
19:49:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SAY 5:01.
19:49:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 5:01, OCTOBER 28.
19:49:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THERE WAS A VOTE ON THAT.
19:49:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL IN FAVOR.
19:49:42 ANY OPPOSED.
19:49:43 MOTION CARRIED.
19:49:51 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
19:49:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, LUCKY NUMBER 8.
19:49:56 >>RYAN MANASSE: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
19:49:58 RYAN MANASSE, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:50:03 I WANT TO INTRODUCE ANNIE BARNES IN OUR JEOPARDY BOX TO
19:50:04 THE LEFT.
19:50:10 ONE OF OUR URBAN PLANNER AND HELPING TO FACILITATE SOME
19:50:11 -- PRESENTING.
19:50:15 I THINK SHE HAS THE NEXT FEW CASES BUT I WANT TO FORM
19:50:20 ALLEY INTRODUCE HER TO COUNCIL.
19:50:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELCOME ANNIE BARNES.
19:50:25 WHERE ARE YOU COMING FOR US.
19:50:27 >> I HAVE BEEN AT THE CITY FOR SIX MONTHS BUT
19:50:29 PREVIOUSLY BEEN SEVERAL JURISDICTIONS INCLUDING
19:50:31 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
19:50:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO GO TOO FAR.
19:50:35 >> NO.
19:50:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELCOME ABOARD.
19:50:39 >> THANK YOU.
19:50:40 ALL RIGHT.
19:50:43 THE NEXT CASE BEFORE IS YOU ITEM NUMBER 8.
19:50:46 THIS IS REZ-21-58.
19:50:51 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED 1302 EAST 23RD AVENUE.
19:50:56 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD FOR
19:50:57 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USE.
19:50:59 I WILL TURN OVER THE PRESENTATION OVER TO THE PLANNING
19:51:03 COMMISSION AND AFTER THEIR PRESENTATION, I WILL
19:51:04 CONCLUDE.
19:51:07 THANK YOU.
19:51:11 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR
19:51:12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:51:14 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:51:16 NEXT ITEM IS REZONING 21-58.
19:51:21 LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANS DISTRICT, MOST
19:51:24 SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
19:51:28 AND DOWN TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL.
19:51:32 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC TRANSIT IS LOCATED 500 FEET TO THE
19:51:34 NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:51:37 NORTH 14TH STREET.
19:51:41 THAT SITE -- THAT STOP, EXCUSE ME, IS SERVED BY HART'S
19:51:42 ROUTE 9.
19:51:45 THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION
19:51:46 ZONE.
19:51:51 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS CUSCADEN
19:51:57 PARK 750 FEET TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:51:58 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL.
19:51:59 IT IS HARD TO SEE.
19:52:01 THIS IS ZOOMED OUT.
19:52:06 THE SUBJECT SITE, THE VERY SMALL SITE, .09 ACRES RIGHT
19:52:08 IN THE CENTER.
19:52:10 DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL SEE THOSE BUILDINGS TO
19:52:11 THE SOUTH.
19:52:18 THAT IS THE CENTRAL PLACE APARTMENTS.
19:52:23 THE PREDOMINANT PATTERN TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST IS
19:52:24 THAT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
19:52:27 YOU HAVE THE MULTIFAMILY TO THE SOUTH.
19:52:31 THIS IS CUSCADEN PARK RIGHT HERE.
19:52:35 ON TO THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:52:38 AGAIN IT IS A VERY SMALL SITE.
19:52:39 HARD TO SEE.
19:52:43 JUST THE PARCEL ITSELF HAS A RESIDENTIAL-20 FUTURE LAND
19:52:44 USE CATEGORY.
19:52:48 THE PARCEL TO THE EAST IS RESIDENTIAL-10.
19:52:51 THAT IS THE TAN COLOR HERE.
19:52:55 DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, WE HAVE A PUBLIC -- SEMI-PUBLIC
19:52:57 USE REPRESENTED BY THE BLUE.
19:53:03 THOSE APARTMENTS THAT ARE LOCATED DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH
19:53:07 INTO THE WEST ARE ACTUALLY THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE
19:53:08 LAND USE CATEGORY.
19:53:13 AND THEN CUSCADEN PARK IS GREEN.
19:53:17 THE CLOSEST COMMERCIAL AREAS ARE LOCATED FURTHER NORTH
19:53:18 ON NORTH 15TH STREET.
19:53:21 THE RED IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
19:53:24 AND DO YOU HAVE SOME COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 PRESENTED
19:53:28 BY THE PINK AT THE INTERSECTION OF 15TH AND EAST 17TH
19:53:30 AVENUE.
19:53:33 THE SUBJECT SITE, AGAIN, IS WITHIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20
19:53:38 DETACHED AND ATTACHED FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CAN BE
19:53:41 CONSIDERED WITHIN THIS LAND USE DESIGNATION.
19:53:44 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20, THE SUBJECT SITE CAN ONLY BE
19:53:48 CONSIDERED FOR A MAXIMUM OF ONE DWELLING UNIT.
19:53:50 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION
19:53:53 AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
19:53:54 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:53:57 SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE UNIQUE POSITION WITH PARCELS
19:54:01 DESIGNATED RES-35 LOCATED TO THE WEST AND SOUTH.
19:54:04 THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
19:54:06 SIMILAR IN FORM, HEIGHT AND SCALE TO THE SURROUNDING
19:54:08 RESIDENTIAL USES.
19:54:10 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING
19:54:13 COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT
19:54:17 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA
19:54:18 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:54:20 THANK YOU.
19:54:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY?
19:54:24 ALL RIGHT.
19:54:28 TURN BACK OVER TO MISS BARNES.
19:54:29 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
19:54:33 I AM GOING TO SHARE MY SCREEN.
19:54:37 ALL RIGHT.
19:54:40 CAN YOU SEE IT?
19:54:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE IT.
19:54:45 >> THERE WE GO.
19:54:46 THANK YOU, AGAIN.
19:54:50 ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:54:53 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 1302 EAST 23RD
19:54:57 AVENUE FROM PD TO PD TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
19:55:01 THE PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USE.
19:55:09 THERE ARE NO WAIVERS WITH THIS REQUEST.
19:55:16 THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR 2180-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING
19:55:19 WITH ONE-CAR GARAGE.
19:55:22 SETBACKS, NORTH, REAR YARD, 15 FEET.
19:55:24 SOUTH FRONT, 20 FEET.
19:55:25 EAST SIDE, 5 FEET.
19:55:27 AND WEST SIDE, 5 FEET.
19:55:31 THE PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF
19:55:35 RES-20 WHICH ALLOWS 20 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:55:38 AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 4200 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE
19:55:44 AND ALLOWS FOR CONSIDERATION OF ONLY ONE DWELLING UNIT.
19:55:46 THIS IS THE AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING ZONING OF THE
19:55:47 PROPERTY.
19:55:49 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED NORTHWEST IN THE
19:55:54 INTERSECTION OF EAST 23RD AVENUE AND NORTH AVENDIA
19:56:03 REPUBLICA DE CUBA IS ZONED PD THAT WAS ZONED VIA
19:56:06 ORDINANCE AND DEVELOPED WITH MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
19:56:09 WITH THE MAXIMUM OF 200 DWELLING UNITS.
19:56:11 PROPERTY LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST AND NORTH OF THE SUBJECT
19:56:13 PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE
19:56:19 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PD UNDER ORDINANCE 8172-A.
19:56:22 THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS VACANT.
19:56:24 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY
19:56:27 RESIDENCE.
19:56:29 SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
19:56:31 ANY RESIDENTIAL LOT OF RECORD LOCATED WITHIN THE EAST
19:56:36 TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT EXISTING AS OF JANUARY 1, 2000,
19:56:40 SHALL BE DEEMED A CONFORMING LOT ALTHOUGH THE SUBJECT
19:56:46 LOT MEASURES 40 FEET IN WIDTH AND CONFORMING OF CURRENT
19:56:51 CONFIGURATION SINCE 1969; HOWEVER, NOT A EUCLIDIAN
19:56:57 ZONING DISTRICT OF A PARCEL THAT MEASURES 40 FEET IN
19:56:58 WIDTH.
19:57:02 SUBJECT SITE WAS OF A NEW PD AND IN 2004 WHERE A
19:57:06 MULTIDEVELOPMENT, THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT
19:57:09 INCLUDED AND PART OF THE ORIGINAL PD.
19:57:12 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO
19:57:14 ALLOW FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
19:57:17 HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON EAST 23RD
19:57:19 AVENUE FACING NORTH.
19:57:23 AS YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IS VACANT.
19:57:26 SHOWN HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
19:57:27 LOCATED WEST.
19:57:29 THIS IS ALSO THE PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE
19:57:30 SUBJECT SITE.
19:57:34 AND THIS IS THE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, ALSO SEEN IN
19:57:35 THIS PICTURE.
19:57:39 SHOWN HERE IS THE PROPERTY LOCATED FURTHER EAST ON THE
19:57:42 SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 23RD AVENUE.
19:57:46 AND, AGAIN, A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY FURTHER EAST ON
19:57:50 THE NORTH SIDE OF 23RD AVENUE.
19:57:55 THE DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW CLIENT STAFF HAS REVIEWED
19:57:59 THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE PETITION -- AND THE
19:58:02 REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
19:58:02 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:58:06 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE
19:58:08 APPLICANT FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE
19:58:11 STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET IMPROVING THE APPLICATION
19:58:14 AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT
19:58:18 HAVE.
19:58:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
19:58:22 ANYTHING FOR MISS BARNES?
19:58:31 ALL RIGHT, WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT THIS TIME.
19:58:40 >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL, I AM JOHN LAROCCA,
19:58:44 REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT, AND I WON'T GO INTO A
19:58:45 LENGTHY INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
19:58:49 STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE BEEN VERY THOROUGH
19:58:52 AND COMPREHENSIVE IN THEIR REPORT.
19:58:54 SIMPLY THIS REQUEST THIS EVENING IS SEEKING AN APPROVAL
19:58:57 TO BUILD A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOME ON A LOT THAT
19:59:02 HAS BEEN CONFIGURED LEGALLY IN THIS FORM SINCE 1969.
19:59:06 FOR THOSE OF YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, AND MR.
19:59:06 MIRANDA --
19:59:08 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: OH, SURE --
19:59:11 >> I AM SURE YOU WILL GIVE ME A REMINDER OR SCHOOLING
19:59:17 ON THIS, BUT THIS WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL CENTRO
19:59:22 ESTUDIANO SITE THAT WAS REZONED TO ACCOMMODATE A SENIOR
19:59:26 HOUSING PROJECT NOW KNOWN AS CENTRAL PLACE.
19:59:30 FOR WHATEVER REASON PARCEL ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE
19:59:34 MULTIFAMILY PROJECT THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN -- AND
19:59:37 SOLD OFF, BUT WAS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL
19:59:38 ZONING.
19:59:42 AND THIS PARTICULAR CASE AS WAS INDICATE IN THE STAFF
19:59:45 REPORT, THE SITE IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY IS
19:59:49 CONSIDERED A LOT OF RECORD AND NORMALLY BE ALLOWED TO
19:59:52 BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON IT.
19:59:57 BECAUSE OF THE PD ZONING BEING PART OF THE CENTRAL
19:59:59 PLACE DEVELOPMENT, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WAS NOT
20:00:00 PERMITTED.
20:00:02 THEREFORE, WE WERE REQUIRED TO -- THE APPLICANT WAS
20:00:05 REQUIRED TO SEEK A REZONING TO SIMPLY ALLOW A
20:00:09 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME.
20:00:10 WE HAVE GONE THROUGH A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
20:00:11 ASSESSMENT.
20:00:14 THERE ARE SOME -- WE MADE SOME CHANGES TO THE PLAN TO
20:00:17 COMPLY WITH EAST TAMPA OVERLAY STANDARDS AS COMMENTED
20:00:26 ON BY THE DESIGN REVIEW SECTION OF THE DEPARTMENT.
20:00:27 AND THIS.
20:00:30 THERE IS A REVISION SHEET AND MOST OF THE REVISIONS ARE
20:00:34 MINOR TYPOS AN CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE AND
20:00:36 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS WITH COMPLIANCE OF NATURAL
20:00:41 RESOURCES AND LANDSCAPING CODE THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO DO
20:00:42 ANYWAY.
20:00:45 WE AGREE WITH ALL THE REVISIONS ON THE PLAN AND
20:00:48 RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
20:00:50 WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
20:00:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. LAROCCA?
20:00:57 >>LUIS VIERA: IT IS LATE AND I HAVE NO FILTER AND MR.
20:01:00 SHELBY -- IT IS GREAT YOU MENTIONED -- THIS HAS NO
20:01:06 BEARING WHATSOEVER -- BUT CENTRO ESTUARANO HOSPITALS,
20:01:09 MY GREAT GRANDFATHER PRACTICED MEDICINE THERE JUAN
20:01:17 SILVERO HE IS BURIED IN -- PERSONAL FAMILY NOTE BECAUSE
20:01:19 I AM TIRED AND I HAVE NO FILTER.
20:01:21 THANK YOU.
20:01:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:01:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU ARE NOT GOING TO ABSTAIN?
20:01:29 [LAUGHTER]
20:01:34 >>LUIS VIERA: WELL BASED ON -- DR. JUAN SILVERO RULE,
20:01:35 DOES THAT QUALIFY.
20:01:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY: LET ME ASK JUST FOR THE RECORD,
20:01:40 COUNCILMAN.
20:01:45 WITH THAT BEING SAID CAN YOU BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL AND
20:01:46 BASED ON THE EVIDENCE.
20:01:50 >>LUIS VIERA: IF I SAY NO, DOES THAT MEAN I GET TO GO
20:01:51 HOME EARLY.
20:01:57 I AM JOKING OF COURSE.
20:01:58 I AM GOOD.
20:02:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK
20:02:01 ON THIS ITEM?
20:02:04 ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
20:02:08 HERE SHE COMES.
20:02:11 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND
20:02:11 GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
20:02:13 NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
20:02:16 THANK YOU.
20:02:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK?
20:02:22 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
20:02:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE AND SECOND TO CLOSE.
20:02:29 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE NEXT.
20:02:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
20:02:43 GIVE ME ONE SECOND.
20:02:45 ALL RIGHT.
20:02:49 WITH REGARD TO FILE NUMBER REZ-21-58, ORDINANCE BEING
20:02:52 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING AND CONSIDERING, AN
20:02:55 ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
20:02:58 1302 EAST 23RD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA,
20:03:01 AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM
20:03:05 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
20:03:08 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL AND
20:03:11 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:03:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
20:03:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEY HAVE MET ALL CONDITIONS WITH
20:03:22 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ACCORDING TO
20:03:24 STAFF REPORTS TO COMMUNITY OBJECTION AND IF THERE ARE
20:03:26 ANY WAIVERS, THEY, TOO, MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
20:03:27 CODE.
20:03:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER MOVED AND MR. MIRANDA
20:03:32 SECONDED.
20:03:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:03:33 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:03:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:03:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:03:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:03:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:03:39 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:03:42 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
20:03:50 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON OCTOBER 21 AT 9:30 A.M.
20:03:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:03:52 ITEM NUMBER 1.
20:03:54 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
20:03:58 ANNIE BARNES, LAND GOVERNMENT COORDINATION.
20:04:09 ITEM NUMBER 9 REZ-21-60, 3428 WEST BEACH STREET, FROM
20:04:14 RESIDENTIAL 50 TO RM-18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
20:04:16 I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
20:04:22 AFTER THEIR PRESENTATION, I WILL COMPLETE.
20:04:25 >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY WITH PLANNING COMMISSION.
20:04:26 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:04:31 THE NEXT ITEM 21-60, LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
20:04:35 PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE PARTICULARLY THE MCFARLAND
20:04:37 PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:04:41 THERE IS TRANSIT WITHIN HALF MILE OF THE SITE ALONG
20:04:43 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
20:04:48 CLOSEST PUBLIC FACILITY IS MACFARLAND PARK AND IT IS
20:04:54 LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE E.
20:04:59 ON TO THE AERIAL.
20:05:00 WE HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:05:01 NORTH HIMES AVENUE.
20:05:04 YOU CAN SEE THE WEST TAMPA WATER TOWER ABOUT TWO BLOCKS
20:05:07 TO THE SOUTH.
20:05:11 YOU HAVE GOT APARTMENTS KIND OF TO THE NORTHWEST.
20:05:14 YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO THE NORTH.
20:05:18 AND PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE EAST
20:05:19 AND SOUTH.
20:05:24 YOU CAN SEE THE AREA -- MUST OF THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES
20:05:30 ARE ALL ALONG NEARBY NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY WHICH IS
20:05:34 LOCATED TO THE WEST.
20:05:40 NOW JUST ONE NOTE OF CLARIFICATION, THE MAP WITHIN YOUR
20:05:42 PACKET.
20:05:44 THE BORDER OF THE MAP IS SLIGHTLY OFF.
20:05:47 THE BORDER OF THE MAP IN THE PACKAGE SHOW THAT THIS
20:05:51 REZONING GOES INTO THE RESIDENTIAL-10 PORTION.
20:05:52 THAT IS INCORRECT.
20:05:57 IT IS ONLY -- THEY ARE ONLY REZONING THE RESIDENTIAL-20
20:05:58 PORTION.
20:06:01 THAT PARCEL IS DIVIDED.
20:06:04 SO ONLY THE RESIDENTIAL 20 PORTIONS ARE BEING -- ARE
20:06:12 REZONED TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18.
20:06:15 TO CLARIFY, THE PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW
20:06:18 CONSIDERATION OF UP TO FOUR DWELLING UNITS ON THE
20:06:21 SUBJECT SITE AND AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 18 DWELLING
20:06:22 UNITS PER ACRE.
20:06:26 THE DENSITY IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE UNDERLYING FUTURE
20:06:29 LAND USE DESIGNATION AND NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER AND
20:06:32 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF THE MACFARLAND
20:06:34 PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:06:37 THOUGH THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT RM-18 IS NOT
20:06:40 PRESENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, TWO MULTIFAMILY
20:06:43 DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST OF THE SITE HAVE
20:06:45 BEEN DEVELOPED UNDER THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING
20:06:46 DISTRICTS.
20:06:50 FURTHER THE RESIDENTIAL-20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
20:06:55 IS TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION FROM A COLLECTOR ROADWAY
20:07:00 NORTH HIMES TO SINGLE FAMILY ALONG WEST BEACH TREAT.
20:07:03 MULTIFAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS
20:07:05 ENCOURAGED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 20.
20:07:10 THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS RESIDENTIAL INFILL,
20:07:13 ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS CLOSE TO TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT
20:07:14 SERVICES.
20:07:19 STAFF ALSO FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE POLL REGARDING
20:07:23 THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY.
20:07:29 OVERALL, THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW VISION UNDER
20:07:33 THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY AND BASED ON THOSE
20:07:35 CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
20:07:37 RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING TO FIND THE REZONING
20:07:40 REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE
20:07:43 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:07:45 THANK YOU.
20:07:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
20:07:48 ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HEY.
20:07:50 BACK TO MISS BARNES.
20:07:54 >> THANK YOU, ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:08:08 I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN.
20:08:12 ALL RIGHTY.
20:08:16 AGAIN, THIS IS REZ 21-60.
20:08:25 THE APPLICANT IS JOHN LUM AND FOR 2430 WEST BEACH
20:08:26 STREET.
20:08:30 FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RESIDENTIAL
20:08:34 MULTIFAMILY RM-18 TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
20:08:38 PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USE.
20:08:42 NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED BECAUSE THIS IS A EUCLIDIAN
20:08:43 ZONING.
20:08:46 THE SUBJECT SITE IS COMPRISED A PORTION OF FIVE LOTS
20:08:50 ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN BLOCK 30 OF THE TOP OF YOUR
20:08:54 SCREEN, TOP LEFT.
20:08:58 MACFARLAND AND PORTIONS OF THE VACATED ALLEY.
20:09:03 EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT WAS 33 FEET IN WIDTH AND 46 FEET IN
20:09:05 LENGTH WHEN PLATTED IN 1908.
20:09:09 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING ZONING.
20:09:11 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A LITTLE OVER QUARTER ACHER IN
20:09:14 SIZE AND LOCATED SOUTHEAST IN THE INTERSECTION OF BEST
20:09:17 BEACH STREET, NORTH HIMES AVENUE.
20:09:19 THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALREADY POINTED OUT THERE IS
20:09:22 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTHWEST AS
20:09:27 WELL.
20:09:30 SHOWN HERE, THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
20:09:33 ON BEST BEACH STREET AND FACING SOUTH.
20:09:36 MOST OF THE SITE IS VACANT OTHER THAN THE PORTION OF AN
20:09:41 EXISTING HOME LOCATED AT 3428 WEST BEACH STREET.
20:09:44 SHOWN HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY NORTH
20:09:48 AND ACROSS WEST BEACH STREET THAT IS ZONED PD AND
20:09:51 DEVELOPED INTO SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLINGS.
20:09:54 HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY LOOKING FURTHER EAST
20:10:01 AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST BEACH STREET.
20:10:07 A PICTURE OF EAST BEACH STREET OF THE MULTIDEVELOPMENT
20:10:10 OF OUR PALMS APARTMENT HOMES.
20:10:13 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
20:10:15 APPLICATION AND FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:10:18 CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
20:10:21 AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
20:10:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MISS BARNES.
20:10:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MISS BARNES, BRIEFLY YOU SHOWED
20:10:29 SOME OF THE STREET PICTURES.
20:10:32 MY RECOLLECTION OF THAT AREA AND THAT STREET IS IT
20:10:39 SEEMS BE TOO MIXTURE OF MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY.
20:10:43 THE CLOSER I THINK YOU GET FOR HIMES, I THINK YOU SORT
20:10:45 OF SHOWED IT IN THAT PICTURE.
20:10:49 LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT BE A MULTIFAMILY OVER HERE NEAR
20:10:50 HIMES.
20:10:58 AM I -- IS MY MEMORY CORRECT ON THAT?
20:11:01 >> CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN NOW?
20:11:04 GUDES LITTLE BIT AND YOU CAN BLOW IT UP.
20:11:05 >> THERE WE GO.
20:11:06 YES, YOU ARE CORRECT.
20:11:09 AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE -- THERE ARE SOME RS-50
20:11:11 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:11:13 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:11:17 AROUND THE PROPERTY, THE MORE NORTHERN YOU GO, THERE
20:11:22 ARE RM-16 ZONED PROPERTY AS WELL AS THIS LARGER PD,
20:11:28 WHICH IS ALSO KNOWN AS ARBOR PONDS APARTMENT HOMES.
20:11:34 SO THIS CORRIDOR SEEMS BE TOO TRANSITIONING AREA FOR
20:11:37 GREATER DEVELOPMENT AND MORE INTENSIFICATION OF USES
20:11:40 THE FARTHER NORTH YOU GO ON HIMES.
20:11:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THOUGHT I READ THE STAFF REPORT
20:11:48 CALLING FOR A MAXIMUM OF FOUR UNITS TOTAL ON THE TWO
20:11:48 LOTS?
20:11:50 >> YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
20:11:54 UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING IT IS -- IT IS ONLY TWO
20:11:56 DWELLING UNITS WILL BE ACCOMMODATED.
20:11:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT.
20:12:01 BUT ON THE PROPOSED -- THE PROPOSED USE FOUR UNITS ON
20:12:04 TWO LOTS.
20:12:09 >> FIVE LOTS
20:12:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOT THE SKINNY LITTLE LOTS.
20:12:15 ON THE TOTAL PROPERTY WHICH OTHERWISE WOULD BE TWO
20:12:18 SINGLE-FAMILIES, WE ARE LOOKING AT, WHAT, FOUR UNITS OR
20:12:21 FIVE UNITS?
20:12:26 >>STEVE MICHELINI: FOUR UNITS ON FIVE LOTS.
20:12:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.
20:12:29 ANNIE'S VOICE GOT VERY DEEP.
20:12:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU ARE CORRECT FROM THAT LOCATION
20:12:35 FROM SPRUCE TO COLUMBUS DRIVE AROUND THE CORNERS OF THE
20:12:38 INTERSECTIONS OF ALL THOSE STREETS FROM PALMETTO TO
20:12:44 BEACH TO ST. JOHN, DOCTOR'S OFFICES TO ATTORNEY'S
20:12:48 OFFICE TO A DENTAL OFFICE TO -- EVERYTHING IS IN THE
20:12:53 CORRIDOR THAT DOESN'T INTERFERE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:13:00 INSIDE -- YOU WILL SEE ILLEGAL HOUSES WITH FOUR OR FIVE
20:13:02 FAMILIES LIVING INSIDE OF THEM.
20:13:03 THAT IS FOR THE RECORD.
20:13:06 MAYBE NOT ON BEACH STREET, BUT ALL THROUGH THERE.
20:13:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYTHING ELSE FOR MISS BARNES.
20:13:11 THE APP.
20:13:17 >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL STEVE
20:13:19 MICHELINI REPRESENTING JOHN LUM.
20:13:24 AS STAFF HAS NOTED THE CORNER OF HIMES AND BEACH AND
20:13:27 DIFFERENT MIX OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT.
20:13:28 IT HAS MULTIFAMILY.
20:13:32 IT HAS FURTHER TO THE EAST SOME SMALLER, SINGLE-FAMILY
20:13:33 LOTS.
20:13:36 THEY ARE ALSO PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND COMMERCIAL
20:13:37 PROPERTIES.
20:13:41 AND VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY.
20:13:43 THE STAFF OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS FOUND IT
20:13:45 CONSISTENT AND A NUMBER OF POLICIES THAT WE ARE
20:13:46 CONSISTENT WITH.
20:13:51 BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, THIS REPRESENTS AN INSERTION OF
20:13:55 NEW DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA THAT IS IN TRANSITION AS THE
20:13:57 STAFF HAS POINTED OUT.
20:14:03 THE LAND USE IS R-20 WHICH SI FOR CONSIDERATION OF
20:14:08 THE RS-18 ZONING.
20:14:11 THE STAFF POINTED OUT UNDER THIS CLASS FACE WAIVERS
20:14:16 APPLIED SEPARATELY AND NO WAIVERS THAT CAN BE GRANTED
20:14:19 UNDER THIS REZONING.
20:14:25 THE PROPERTY IS JUST UNDER 12,000, 11,857 SQUARE FEET,
20:14:27 .27 ACRES.
20:14:29 AND FIVE LOTS OF WHICH WE ARE PROPOSING WOULD BE
20:14:35 ALLOWED FOUR DEVELOPMENT UNITS WOULD BE THE MAX NAME
20:14:39 WOULD BE ALLOWED ON THOSE SHOULD COUNCIL APPROVE THIS
20:14:40 REZONING.
20:14:42 THE AREA HAS SEEN A LOT OF DIFFERENT NEW GROWTH.
20:14:48 MOST OF THAT HAS BEEN FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND
20:14:49 MULTIFAMILY ON THIS PARTICULAR AREA.
20:14:53 AND ONE OF THE COUNCILMEMBERS HAVE ALREADY POINTED OUT
20:14:56 THAT THIS AREA IS IN TRANSITION FOR PROFESSIONAL
20:14:57 OFFICES.
20:15:01 A MIX OF HOUSING UNITS IN THE INTERFACE OF LAND IN A
20:15:02 VARIETY OF WAYS.
20:15:06 BUT BEING ON HIMES AND BEING ON THE CORNER THIS HAS A
20:15:09 PARTICULAR AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT STRESS APPLIED TO IT,
20:15:13 WHICH IS WHY IT WOULD BE IDEAL TO CONVERT THIS TO A
20:15:17 RM-18 AND ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE UNITS.
20:15:20 THE CITY STAFF ALSO FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
20:15:24 AND AS I SAID, WE -- WE MEET A NUMBER THE OBJECTIVES
20:15:33 UNDER THE LAND USE CODE OBJECTIVE 9.2.2.1.3, 9.23,
20:15:45 9.38, 9.6, 6.2, 6.3, 9.71, 9.73.
20:15:47 ANYWAY, CONSISTENT WITH THE ST. LOUIS COLD AND THE
20:15:50 PROVISIONS THAT ARE APPLIED TO THIS SITE.
20:15:53 AND THE CITY STAFF HAS FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT AS
20:15:56 WELL AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:15:58 I WILL BE HAPPY TO AGE ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT
20:16:01 HAVE BUT WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:16:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT?
20:16:08 ANYONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON THE SECOND
20:16:09 FLOOR.
20:16:12 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
20:16:19 ITEM.
20:16:22 AILEEN ROSARIO, GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
20:16:24 NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
20:16:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE.
20:16:27 MR. MIRANDA.
20:16:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:16:37 ITEM NUMBER 9, FILE NUMBER REZ-21-60, MOVE AN ORDINANCE
20:16:41 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3430 WEST
20:16:43 BEACH STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
20:16:46 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
20:16:50 RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RM-18 RESIDENTIAL
20:16:54 MULTI FAMILY AND THE APPLICANT HAS COMPETENT
20:16:57 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE SITE PLAN MEETS WITH THE
20:17:02 STANDARDS OF SECTION 27, 129 OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE
20:17:06 THAT THE LAND USE NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT OR HAVE
20:17:09 MORE INTENSIVE OR INCOMPATIBLE USE IN THE SURROUNDING
20:17:10 AREA.
20:17:17 WILL ENSURE THE PUBLIC, SAFETY, AND WHERE PROPOSED AND
20:17:21 DEVELOPED AND OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USE.
20:17:25 AND CONTIGUOUS WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
20:17:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA MOVED IT.
20:17:30 CITRO SECONDED.
20:17:32 >> IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN, THERE IS NOT AN APPLICATION
20:17:34 FOR A SPECIAL USE.
20:17:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM SORRY THEN.
20:17:38 NO WAIVERS.
20:17:44 I SUBMIT THE -- WITHDRAW THE SPECIAL USE PART.
20:17:47 >> JUST A EUCLIDIAN REZONING.
20:17:49 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T HAVE THAT ON WHAT YOU GAVE
20:17:50 ME.
20:17:51 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:17:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:17:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:17:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:17:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:17:57 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:17:59 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
20:18:10 SECOND READING ADOPTION OCTOBER 21 AT 9:30.
20:18:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM 11.
20:18:16 >> ANNIE BARNES LAND DEVELOPMENT.
20:18:20 FILE NUMBER REZ-21-68.
20:18:25 3416 OHIO AVENUE FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
20:18:29 TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:18:30 I WILL TURNING OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
20:18:34 AFTER THE PRESENTATION I WILL CONCLUDE MINE.
20:18:36 >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
20:18:38 IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:18:40 HOPEFULLY YOU CAN STILL SEE ME.
20:18:43 I THINK THE COUNTY CENTER EITHER HAVE NOT PAID THEIR
20:18:47 ELECTRIC BILLS AND SHUTTING ALL THEIR LIGHTS ON ME.
20:18:50 BUT HOPEFULLY NOW YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN.
20:18:56 THIS SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA
20:19:01 PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE
20:19:07 INTERBAY SOUTH OF GANDY NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE TAMPA
20:19:08 DISTRICT.
20:19:13 THE CURRENT TRANSIT IS LOCATED 1200 TO THE WEST ON THE
20:19:16 CORNER OF SOUTH DALE MABRY AND BAY AVENUE.
20:19:21 BUT THAT -- THAT PORTION OF SOUTH DALE MABRY IS SERVED
20:19:26 BY HART'S ROUTE 360 LX WHICH CONNECTS THE SITE TO
20:19:28 MACDILL, DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND BRANDON.
20:19:33 LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE AND THE
20:19:36 CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY SKY VIEW PARK
20:19:41 LOCATED TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:19:43 WE HAVE AN AERIAL.
20:19:44 IT IS ZOOMED OUT.
20:19:45 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:19:49 WE HAVE OHIO AVENUE ON THE NORTH.
20:19:51 LOCATED TO THE WEST.
20:19:55 TO THE SOUTH IS BAY.
20:20:00 THIS AS YOU CAN SEE IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY
20:20:02 ATTACHED.
20:20:06 CHIARMONTE ELEMENTARY TO THE NORTHWEST.
20:20:09 AND THEN SKY VIEW PARK IS FURTHER TO THE SOUTHEAST.
20:20:14 AND THIS IS THAT LARGE ELAPP PROPERTY THAT IS DOWN IN
20:20:15 SOUTH TAMPA.
20:20:22 I BELIEVE THIS IS THE WINDWARD LAKES MOBILE
20:20:23 HOME PARK TO THE SOUTHWEST.
20:20:25 BUT SURROUNDING THE SITE IS PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY
20:20:27 DETACHED.
20:20:33 AS WE MOVE ON TO THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, THE
20:20:36 SUBJECT SITE AND THE PROPERTIES AROUND IT ARE
20:20:37 RESIDENTIAL-10.
20:20:42 YOU DON'T GET HIGHER DENSITY UNTIL STERLING AVENUE
20:20:44 HEADED TO DALE MABRY.
20:20:46 SOME TO THE NORTH WHERE AN EXISTING TOWN HOME COMMUNITY
20:20:52 IS AND ADDITIONAL DENSITY UNDER THE RES-20 TOWARD SOUTH
20:20:53 MACDILL.
20:20:56 THE PINK IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
20:21:01 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE ROUGHLY .64 ACRES
20:21:04 FROM THAT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 60 TO THE
20:21:06 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 50.
20:21:09 THE APPLICANT PLANS TO SPLIT THE FAR SELL INTO FOUR
20:21:13 INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITH THE CONSIDERING OF FOUR
20:21:18 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
20:21:20 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION
20:21:22 AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
20:21:24 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:21:28 THIS PORTION OF OHIO AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH SHERIDAN ROAD
20:21:31 AND SOUTH SHERWOOD AVENUE HAS AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF
20:21:35 5.67 UNITS PER ACRE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 17 SAMPLE
20:21:36 SITES.
20:21:39 THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF FOUR
20:21:42 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES.
20:21:46 AND OVERALL DENSITY OF 6.25 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS
20:21:48 CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10
20:21:51 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
20:21:54 FURTHERMORE THE PROPOSED REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR
20:21:58 DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SIMILAR IN FORM, HEIGHT AND SCALE
20:22:00 OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES FOUND ALONG THIS
20:22:04 PORTION OF OHIO AVENUE.
20:22:10 IN CAN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS FOUND COMPARABLE AND
20:22:12 COMPATIBLE WITH THAT SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
20:22:14 AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, YOUR PLANNING
20:22:17 COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT --
20:22:21 TO FIND THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE
20:22:24 PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
20:22:25 PLAN.
20:22:26 THANK YOU.
20:22:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY?
20:22:29 ALL RIGHT.
20:22:37 GO BACK TO MISS BARNES.
20:22:39 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
20:22:41 CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
20:22:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:22:46 IF YOU CAN BLOW IT UP FOR US THOUGH.
20:22:47 ALL RIGHT HE.
20:23:25 THANK YOU.
20:23:28 >> .64 ACRES IN SIZE.
20:23:32 THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP WITH THE SURROUNDING ZONING.
20:23:34 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE
20:23:38 INTERSECTION OF OHIO AVENUE AND SOUTH SHERWOOD AVENUE.
20:23:42 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY
20:23:47 DWELLINGS LOCATED WITH THE RS-60 AND RS-50 ZONING
20:23:49 DISTRICTS AS SEEN.
20:23:53 THIS IS A CONFORMING MAP OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
20:23:58 THE AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDED 429 TOTAL ZONING LOTS AND
20:24:02 STAFF IDENTIFIED 52% OF THE LOTS IN THE STUDY AREA.
20:24:09 60% OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK AND 70% AND 57 OF THE BLOCK
20:24:10 FACE.
20:24:13 LOT WHICH 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
20:24:16 THEREFORE, STAFF FIND THE PROPOSED REQUEST FOR REZONING
20:24:19 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT --
20:24:22 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA BLOCK AND
20:24:27 BLACK FACE.
20:24:31 SHOWN HERE IS THE PROPERTY SOUTH ON OHIO AVENUE.
20:24:34 HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED
20:24:37 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ACROSS OHIO AVENUE.
20:24:41 HERE IS A PICTURE OF PROPERTY LOCATED WEST AND ALONG
20:24:43 OHIO AVENUE.
20:24:46 AND SHOWN HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED
20:24:51 FURTHER EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG OHIO AVENUE.
20:24:55 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FOUND THE
20:24:58 REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF
20:25:00 ORDINANCES AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS
20:25:01 THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
20:25:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
20:25:04 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
20:25:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MISS BARNES, YOU MENTIONED THE
20:25:10 ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTY BUT WHAT IS THE DIMENSION AND
20:25:12 THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY?
20:25:18 >> SO -- MAYBE I CAN STILL SHARE MY SCREEN POSSIBLY.
20:25:22 CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
20:25:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOT YET.
20:25:26 >> HOLD ON ONE MINUTE.
20:25:30 I THINK I EXITED TOO SOON.
20:25:31 OPINION.
20:25:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THERE IT IS.
20:25:36 >> THE SURVEY WHICH THE EXACTLY 200 FEET IN EACH
20:25:44 PLATTED -- ORIGINAL PLATTED LOT IS 50 FEET IN WIDTH.
20:25:49 SO UNDER THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION AND ZONING OF RS-60.
20:25:56 IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT THE FOUR DWELLING UNITS COULD BE
20:26:00 SOUGHT AND RS-60 BECAUSE YOU NEED 60 FEET OF MINIMUM
20:26:01 LOT WIDTH.
20:26:03 WOULD BE ONLY THREE.
20:26:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: EFFECTIVELY RETURNING TO THE
20:26:09 ORIGINAL PLAT.
20:26:09 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
20:26:12 HISTORICALLY PLATTED LOT.
20:26:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
20:26:16 WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
20:26:19 >> HELLO AGAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
20:26:20 I'M JOHN LaROCCA, AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT AND OWNERS,
20:26:25 ASHLEY AND BRETT RUSSELL.
20:26:27 THE REQUEST THIS EVENING IS TO RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING
20:26:30 FOUR PLATTED LOTS THAT WERE PART OF THE INTERBAY
20:26:34 SUBDIVISION PLATTED IN 1914.
20:26:36 THESE LOTS, WHILE THEY ARE 50 FEET WIDE, THEY ARE 139
20:26:41 FEET DEEP, AND THEY ARE EACH ALMOST 7,000 SQUARE FEET IN
20:26:45 SIZE.
20:26:46 ALMOST 2,000 FEET LARGER --
20:26:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHY DON'T YOU RESERVE FOR REBUTTAL,
20:26:51 JOHN?
20:26:52 >> OKAY.
20:26:53 I'LL BE QUICK AND SAY, AGAIN, THAT THE STAFF, BOTH THE
20:26:55 PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
20:26:57 STAFF HAVE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB.
20:26:59 I WOULD WRITE A REPORT LIKE THIS.
20:27:01 I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST APPROVAL AND WILL ANSWER ANY
20:27:05 QUESTIONS.
20:27:05 THANK YOU.
20:27:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
20:27:08 ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
20:27:12 ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON THE SECOND FLOOR?
20:27:31 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS
20:27:33 ITEM.
20:27:34 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
20:27:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA MOVED TO CLOSE.
20:27:37 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:27:38 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:27:39 ANY OPPOSED?
20:27:40 MOTION CARRIED.
20:27:42 MR. VIERA, IF YOU DON'T MIND, SIR.
20:27:46 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:27:48 I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
20:27:50 CONSIDERATION.
20:27:51 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
20:27:53 3416 OHIO AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE
20:27:56 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
20:27:58 CLASSIFICATION RS-60 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY) TO RS-50
20:28:02 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
20:28:06 DATE.
20:28:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA MOVED IT.
20:28:08 MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED.
20:28:08 ROLL CALL VOTE.
20:28:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:28:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.
20:28:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:28:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:28:14 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:28:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:28:17 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:28:18 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
20:28:18 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20:28:20 21st AT 9:30 A.M.
20:28:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:28:26 >> AND THANK YOU.
20:28:30 >>LUIS VIERA: IS ANYONE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THEIR SIRE?
20:28:33 >> I HAD ONE EARLIER.
20:28:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: GENTLEMEN, LAST ITEM OF THE EVENING,
20:28:36 ITEM NUMBER 13.
20:28:38 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:28:41 ITEM NUMBER 13, CASE REZ-20-96.
20:28:45 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3215 WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET.
20:28:50 3002 NORTH MATANZAS AVENUE AND 3209 WEST COLUMBUS AND
20:28:58 3246 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
20:29:01 THIS PROPOSING REZONE FROM RS 50 AND CG TO PD, COMMERCIAL
20:29:05 PARKING.
20:29:06 I'LL PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS
20:29:09 TIME.
20:29:14 >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING
20:29:15 COMMISSION STAFF.
20:29:16 IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:29:18 ALL RIGHT.
20:29:32 YOU SHOULD BE SEEING THE SCREEN.
20:29:33 WE END TONIGHT IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
20:29:37 THE SUBJECT SITE AGAIN, THIS SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN
20:29:43 THE MacFARLANE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:29:48 PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE WITHIN A MIXED USE
20:29:51 CORRIDOR.
20:29:51 THERE ARE SPECIFIC POLICY DIRECTIONS WHICH GUIDES
20:29:53 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THOSE MIXED USE CORRIDORS WITHIN THE
20:29:56 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:29:56 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS ACTUALLY ADJACENT TO THE SITE
20:30:02 AT NORTH LINCOLN AND WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
20:30:05 THAT'S SERVED BY HART ROUTE 15.
20:30:07 CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS MacFARLANE PARK.
20:30:11 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE
20:30:15 E.
20:30:15 HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:30:22 YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE SITE OF THE LA TERESITA
20:30:27 RESTAURANT.
20:30:28 THIS IS WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
20:30:30 YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL USES ALONG COLUMBUS DRIVE, AND
20:30:35 THEN IT TYPICALLY DROPS, ESPECIALLY TO THE SOUTH AND
20:30:39 FURTHER NORTH OF COLUMBUS.
20:30:41 IT'S PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED WITH SOME
20:30:44 SCATTERED DUPLEXES IN THERE.
20:30:47 THE COMMERCIAL EXTENDS FURTHER EAST AS WELL TO THE
20:30:51 INTERSECTION OF MacDILL AND COLUMBUS.
20:30:53 HERE WE HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:30:58 THERE IS A LOT GOING ON HERE.
20:31:01 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS RED COLOR.
20:31:06 THAT'S THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
20:31:08 THAT ALLOWS TO -- ZONING.
20:31:12 THE SOUTHERN PORTION HAS RESIDENTIAL 20, AND THEN THE
20:31:17 SECOND SEGMENT LOCATED TO THE NORTHEAST IS IN THE
20:31:21 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, OUR FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:31:25 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS REQUEST.
20:31:34 1.73-ACRE SITE.
20:31:38 FOLIO NUMBER -- THE CERTAIN FOLIO NUMBERS THAT ARE
20:31:42 INCLUDED WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
20:31:44 SINCE THE REQUEST IS FOR AN ACCESSORY PARKING, THE
20:31:47 EXISTING RESTAURANT, THAT CURRENTLY OCCUPIES THIS FOLIO
20:31:51 NUMBER, THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT
20:31:54 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING THE APPLICANT REMOVE
20:31:57 CERTAIN FOLIOS THAT ZAIN WILL GO INTO DETAIL WITH.
20:32:01 OUR REVIEW IS JUST BASED ON THE REMAINING FOLIOS AFTER
20:32:10 THE OTHER ONES ARE REMOVED, THAT ZAIN WILL ELABORATE ON.
20:32:14 WHILE THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING A CROSSWALK FROM THE
20:32:18 NORTHERN SIDEWALK TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK ON WEST
20:32:21 COLUMBUS, THERE ARE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS ARE NOT PROVIDED
20:32:24 WITHIN THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA TO THE SIDEWALK ON WEST
20:32:29 COLUMBUS AVENUE.
20:32:30 THEREFORE, IT IS UNCLEAR HOW PEDESTRIANS WILL SAFELY AND
20:32:32 ACCESSIBLY ACCESS THE SIDEWALK ON WEST COLUMBUS AVENUE
20:32:39 WITHOUT HAVING TO NAVIGATE THROUGH THE DRIVE AISLE.
20:32:41 THIS CONCERN WAS PRESENTED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:32:43 STAFF'S DRC REPORT AND THE DRC MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT
20:32:48 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:32:50 STAFF STRONGLY ENCOURAGES THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE
20:32:53 INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WITHIN THE NORTHERN
20:32:55 PARKING AREA TO THE SIDEWALK ON WEST COLUMBUS AVENUE TO
20:32:59 HELP ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY.
20:33:01 THAT WOULD ALSO BE CONSISTENT WITH A NUMBER OF
20:33:04 NEIGHBORHOOD AND LAND USE POLICIES AS OUTLINED WITHIN
20:33:08 YOUR STAFF REPORT.
20:33:09 IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE
20:33:13 WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND FURTHERMORE,
20:33:16 THE PROPOSED ACCESSORY PARKING CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN
20:33:20 THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
20:33:23 SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:33:25 STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
20:33:30 THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:33:33 THANK YOU.
20:33:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
20:33:35 ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY?
20:33:36 WE'RE BACK TO ZAIN.
20:33:39 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: THANKS SO MUCH.
20:33:40 ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:33:42 CASE REZ 20-96, APPLICANT AND REPRESENTATIVE IS STEPHEN
20:33:47 MICHELINI.
20:33:48 PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3215 WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET,
20:33:54 3002 NORTH MATANZAS DAVE, AND 3209 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
20:34:02 PROPOSED REZONE FROM RS 50 AND CG TO PD PLANNED
20:34:05 DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL OFF-STREET PARKING.
20:34:07 THERE ARE FIVE PROPOSED WAIVERS HERE.
20:34:09 THE FIRST ONE TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT TO BE
20:34:12 SEPARATED BY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE NORTH PARKING
20:34:14 LOT, AS I'LL SHOW YOU IN THE NEXT SLIDE, TO ALSO, NUMBER
20:34:18 TWO IS TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ACCESS TO A LOCAL
20:34:22 STREET ON NORTH MATANZAS AVENUE AND NORTH ST. VINCENT
20:34:26 STREET.
20:34:27 NUMBER THREE IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFER
20:34:30 FROM 15 FEET TO 6 FEET -- SORRY, FROM 15 FEET WITH 6-FOOT
20:34:36 MASONRY WALL AT THE NORTHERN PARKING LOT ON THE NORTH AND
20:34:39 WEST PROPERTY LINE TO 8.7 FEET AND 1.5 FEET.
20:34:44 RESPECTFULLY AND A 6-FOOT PVC FENCE.
20:34:49 THIS WILL BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:34:52 NUMBER FOUR IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFER
20:34:55 FROM 15 FEET WITH 6-FOOT MASONRY WALL TO 4 FEET AND NO
20:34:59 WALL TO THE SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PARKING LOT.
20:35:01 ALSO TO BE ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:35:04 AND THEN THE FIFTH IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED VUA BUFFER
20:35:07 ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 8 FEET TO 4 FEET ON THE
20:35:11 EAST AND 8 FEET TO 6 FEET ON THE SOUTH FROM THE NORTHERN
20:35:15 PARKING LOT ALONG MATANZAS AND COLUMBUS AVENUE.
20:35:17 ALSO, B, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED VEHICULAR USE AREA OF
20:35:24 GREENSPACE TO BE BELOW 20%.
20:35:27 PAYMENT IN LIEU IS REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING FOR
20:35:29 THE DEFICIENT AMOUNT OF GREENSPACE.
20:35:32 AS WE COME TO THE SITE HERE, THERE ARE THREE PARCELS
20:35:38 BEING USED IN THIS APPLICATION.
20:35:42 USE FOR THE APPLICATION IS TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
20:35:44 THE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL OFF-STREET PARKING.
20:35:47 AS YOU SEE THE TWO LOTS TO THE NORTH AND THE ONE HERE TO
20:35:51 THE SOUTH.
20:35:51 THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH CONSISTS OF AN AREA OF 48,676
20:35:58 SQUARE FEET.
20:35:59 DOWN HERE TO THE SOUTH, YOU'LL SEE THE LOT ALSO HERE
20:36:03 CONSISTS OF 11,198 SQUARE FEET.
20:36:07 TO THE NORTH, THE LOT IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL
20:36:13 SINGLE-FAMILY AND TO THE WEST THERE'S RESIDENTIAL
20:36:16 SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:36:17 TO THE EAST HERE AND SOUTH YOU HAVE RETAIL, AS I'LL SHOW
20:36:21 YOU IN THE PICTURES IN THE SLIDES TO COME.
20:36:24 THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH HERE IS SURROUNDED BY
20:36:27 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH, COMMERCIAL
20:36:30 PARKING TO THE WEST, RESTAURANT HERE TO THE NORTH, AND A
20:36:35 STORE OVER HERE TO THE EAST, AS I'LL SHOW YOU IN THE
20:36:38 PICTURES TO COME.
20:36:38 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE GOING RIGHT THROUGH BOTH PARCELS.
20:36:44 AS YOU COME HERE, YOU'LL SEE THE SITE PLAN OF WHERE THE
20:36:52 PROPOSED PARKING IS LOCATED TO THE NORTH.
20:36:54 THE RESTAURANT ACROSS THE STREET AND ALSO THE PARKING LOT
20:37:00 HERE TO THE SOUTH.
20:37:01 THERE ARE 35 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED.
20:37:05 THERE WILL BE NO CHANGES OVER HERE TO THE PD TO THE
20:37:08 RESTAURANT, WHICH IS NAMED LA TERESITA.
20:37:12 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE YOU'LL SEE WHAT THE LOT TO THE
20:37:19 NORTH CONSISTS OF.
20:37:20 VACANT LOT OVER HERE.
20:37:21 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, TO THE NORTH YOU'LL SEE THE
20:37:24 COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS I WAS TALKING, ABOUT ALL THE
20:37:28 SHOPS AND STORES.
20:37:31 TO THE SITE TO THE SOUTH, YOU'LL SEE THE PARKING LOT TO
20:37:35 THE WEST, SOUTHWEST, AND ALL THE RESIDENTIAL
20:37:38 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ALONG THE STREET.
20:37:41 AND THE SITE TO THE SOUTH BEING BLOCKED BY A FENCE, BUT
20:37:46 THIS IS WHERE THE SITE WOULD BE FOR THAT PROPOSED
20:37:49 PARKING.
20:37:49 IF YOU'RE LOOKING AWAY FROM THE SITE TO THE SOUTH, YOU'LL
20:37:56 SEE THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ACROSS THE STREET.
20:38:00 AND THEN SOUTHEAST OF THE PARCEL YOU'LL SEE RESIDENTIAL
20:38:04 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND ALSO A STORE TO THE EAST.
20:38:06 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THE
20:38:11 APPLICATION AND FINDS THIS REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE
20:38:14 CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
20:38:16 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO GO AHEAD AND
20:38:18 APPROVE THE APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS WHICH WERE
20:38:21 STATED BEFORE NEED TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
20:38:23 READING.
20:38:24 AS STATED ALSO ON THE REVISION SHEET.
20:38:26 THANK YOU.
20:38:27 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, IF NEEDED.
20:38:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR ZAIN?
20:38:31 ALL RIGHT.
20:38:33 WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.
20:38:34 >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
20:38:36 STEVE MICHELINI.
20:38:37 I'M REPRESENTING LUIS CAPDEVILA, WHO IS THE OWNER OF THE
20:38:42 LA TERESITA RESTAURANT.
20:38:43 I'M PRETTY SURE MANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN THERE AND YOU
20:38:46 RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT THEY NEED PARKING.
20:38:49 SO LET ME SHOW YOU AN EXISTING CONDITION THAT'S DIRECTLY
20:38:52 BEHIND THE RESTAURANT.
20:38:53 IT HAS AN EXISTING FENCE AND BUFFER WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT
20:39:00 TO BE COUNTED.
20:39:01 WHEN ZAIN WAS READING OFF THE WAIVERS, THOSE WAIVERS
20:39:04 REFLECTED WHAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WERE FOR THE
20:39:07 PROPERTIES.
20:39:07 THIS IS THE INSIDE OF THAT SAME VIEW OF THAT SAME PIECE
20:39:15 OF PROPERTY.
20:39:16 THIS IS THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET, AND IT DIRECTLY
20:39:20 ABUTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROAD.
20:39:26 ANOTHER COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT THAT HAS A DRIVEWAY THAT
20:39:29 WE WOULD NEED A WAIVER FOR THAT ACCESS.
20:39:32 THAT'S ONE OF THE OTHER WAIVERS THAT WE'RE REQUESTING.
20:39:35 I THINK THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOGNIZED THAT THIS
20:39:43 IS AN EXISTING RESTAURANT THAT HAS THE NEED FOR PARKING,
20:39:48 AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITH
20:39:50 RESPECT TO THE LAND USE CODES THAT ARE APPLICABLE IN THE
20:39:53 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:39:54 WHEN I SPOKE TO THE CITY STAFF ABOUT THE REASON FOR THEIR
20:40:00 INCONSISTENCIES AND THEY ADVISED ME THAT THE NUMBER OF
20:40:03 WAIVERS THAT WERE BEING REQUESTED WAS A LOT, AND WE
20:40:08 RECOGNIZE THAT.
20:40:09 HOWEVER, WE HAVE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES HERE WITH THE
20:40:12 EXISTING RESTAURANT.
20:40:14 THEY'VE BEEN PARKING ON THESE LOTS FOR QUITE A WHILE, AND
20:40:19 THEY WERE CONTACTED BY THE ZONING OFFICE AND TOLD THAT
20:40:24 THE ZONING DID NOT ALLOW FOR THE PARKING.
20:40:27 SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE BEFORE YOU TO TRY TO STRAIGHTEN THAT
20:40:30 OUT.
20:40:30 WE ARE WILLING TO MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE REQUESTED BY
20:40:35 THE STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND TO MAKE
20:40:38 THE COMMITMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEREIN.
20:40:41 THE PROPERTY, AS STAFF HAS POINTED OUT ZONED RS 50 AND
20:40:46 CG, ALTHOUGH THE LAND USE IS CC 35 ON TWO OF THE PARCELS
20:40:52 AND THEN R 20 ON ONE OF THE OTHER REMAINING PARCELS.
20:40:58 YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER AS WELL THAT THE PROPERTY TO THE
20:41:02 NORTH FRONTS ON COLUMBUS DRIVE AND THE ACCESS IS ON THE
20:41:06 SIDE STREET, WHICH IS MATANZAS.
20:41:09 SO WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE THE
20:41:14 PARKING LOTS COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE AND THE CITY
20:41:18 ZONING REQUIREMENTS.
20:41:19 WE CERTAINLY ARE WILLING TO MAKE THE CHANGES, AS I SAID,
20:41:23 TO THE SITE PLANS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:41:27 THIS HAS TAKEN US, IF YOU NOTICE THE REZ NUMBER IS 20-96.
20:41:32 IT'S TAKEN US ALMOST A YEAR TO GET TO YOU BECAUSE OF ALL
20:41:36 OF THIS DIFFICULTIES REGARDING THE SITE PLAN AND HOW IT
20:41:40 SHOULD BE DESIGNED AND MAKE IT COMPATIBLE WITH THE
20:41:42 EXISTING RESTAURANT.
20:41:43 WE ARE REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL FOR THIS.
20:41:48 WE HAVE THE NEED FOR THE PARKING, AND IT KEEPS THE CARS
20:41:53 FROM GOING ON TO THE SIDE STREETS AND PARKING ON THE
20:41:56 RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
20:41:57 I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, BUT WE
20:42:00 RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
20:42:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?
20:42:05 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO QUESTIONS.
20:42:06 SOME STATEMENTS ON THE -- ON THE ONE ON THE NORTH,
20:42:09 Z20-96, THAT SITS JUST WEST OF THE CORNER WHERE THE
20:42:14 JEWELRY STORE IS AT, RIGHT?
20:42:16 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
20:42:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S BEEN USED MAYBE WITHOUT EVEN
20:42:19 THE NOTICE OF THE OWNER.
20:42:21 SOMETIMES YOU GO BY THERE IS A BIG TRUCK PARKED THERE.
20:42:24 I'M SURE HE DIDN'T PARK THE TRUCK THERE BECAUSE THAT
20:42:27 DOESN'T DO ANY BUSINESS FOR HIM.
20:42:27 AND SOMETIMES DURING THE CHRISTMAS THEY PUT TREES, WHICH
20:42:30 NEIGHBORHOODS GO IN AND BUY CHRISTMAS TREES AND STUFF OF
20:42:30 THAT NATURE, AM I CORRECT THAT'S THE SITE?
20:42:35 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
20:42:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THIS, IF IT DOES HAPPEN, HE HAS TO
20:42:39 BRING THE LOT INTO ZONING CODE REGARDING PARKING LOTS,
20:42:42 CORRECT?
20:42:43 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
20:42:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND THEN THE ONE ON THE OTHER SIDE --
20:42:44 I LOOKED UP AND I THOUGHT IT WAS HIS FATHER WHEN I JUST
20:42:48 SAW HIM.
20:42:49 NOT THE SAME THING, BUT I'VE KNOWN THE FAMILY FOR 50
20:42:53 YEARS, I GUESS.
20:42:55 HARD WORKERS.
20:42:56 THEY STARTED WORKING -- THEY HAD A LITTLE GROCERY STORE
20:42:59 AND THEN THEY BOUGHT THE SERVICE STATION ON THE CORNER
20:43:02 AND THAT'S WHERE THE RESTAURANT STARTED.
20:43:04 NOW IT'S A BAKERY, AM I CORRECT?
20:43:06 >> YES.
20:43:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THERE IS A HISTORY THERE THAT GOES ON
20:43:09 TO SUCCESS.
20:43:10 AND THEN THE PARKING IN THE BACK, IT HAS, IT STARTED WAY
20:43:13 BACK.
20:43:14 WE'RE GOING BACK 30 YEARS MAYBE.
20:43:16 AND WE'VE HAD SOME CONVERSATION ON AND OFF, IF -- THIS
20:43:24 ALSO HAS TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE STANDARDS OF PARKING,
20:43:26 CORRECT?
20:43:27 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.
20:43:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S ALL I WANT TO SAY.
20:43:30 THANK YOU.
20:43:30 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS IS CONSIDERED TO BE OVERFLOW
20:43:33 PARKING.
20:43:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I UNDERSTAND.
20:43:34 >>STEVE MICHELINI: SO WE DO HAVE TO IMPROVE IT, BUT AS
20:43:37 YOU KNOW FROM OUR HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE, THIS HAS BEEN
20:43:41 USED AS A PARKING LOT FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
20:43:44 AND WE NEED TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE.
20:43:46 AND WE PLAN TO DO THAT.
20:43:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?
20:43:51 ALL RIGHT.
20:43:54 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS
20:43:57 ITEM?
20:43:57 I THOUGHT WE LOST MS. AILEEN.
20:44:04 >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
20:44:07 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
20:44:09 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:44:10 GOOD NIGHT.
20:44:10 >> GOOD NIGHT.
20:44:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:44:11 ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK?
20:44:13 >>THE CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
20:44:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MOVED TO CLOSE.
20:44:17 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:44:18 THE MOTION CARRIED.
20:44:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WASN'T GOING TO SUPPORT IT BUT I
20:44:29 CHANGED MY MIND.
20:44:30 I THREW EVERYTHING WAY.
20:44:32 I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
20:44:34 CONSIDERATION.
20:44:35 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
20:44:37 3215 WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, 3002 NORTH MATANZAS AVENUE
20:44:42 AND 3209 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
20:44:46 FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
20:44:48 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL,
20:44:52 SINGLE-FAMILY) AND CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) TO PD (PLANNED
20:44:56 DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL OFF-STREET PARKING); PROVIDING AN
20:44:58 EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:44:59 BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT I BELIEVE THAT COMPETENT
20:45:04 AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WAS STATED BY THE APPLICANT, AND
20:45:09 THEY GAVE THEIR REASONING.
20:45:13 AS TO BRINGING THIS PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE AND FOR THE
20:45:17 USE THAT IT'S GOING TO BE AND HOW IT WILL BENEFIT THE
20:45:20 SURROUNDING AREA.
20:45:26 AND THAT'S IT.
20:45:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
20:45:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND THE REVISION SHEET.
20:45:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDED BY MR. CITRO.
20:45:33 ROLL CALL VOTE.
20:45:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:45:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:45:36 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:45:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:45:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M GOING TO SUPPORT IT OVER STAFF'S
20:45:45 CONCERNS JUST BECAUSE IT IS AN EXISTING CONDITION.
20:45:49 EXISTED FOR A LONG TIME, AND THIS IS JUST HOPEFULLY
20:45:52 MAKING IT BETTER.
20:45:54 YES.
20:45:55 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:45:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:45:58 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
20:45:59 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20:46:01 21st AT 9:30 A.M.
20:46:04 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
20:46:06 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:46:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:46:07 GOOD NIGHT.
20:46:08 MR. MIRANDA, DO WE HAVE ANYTHING?
20:46:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR.
20:46:11 I HAVE A COUPLE OF SMALL THINGS HERE.
20:46:12 REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET AN ADOPTION
20:46:15 HEARING FOR TA/CPA 21-20 FOR DECEMBER 9, 2021 AT 5:01 AND
20:46:23 DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK
20:46:26 WITH THE FORMS AND NOTICE OF ADVERTISING FOR PUBLIC
20:46:28 HEARING.
20:46:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDED BY MR. VIERA.
20:46:31 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:46:33 ANY OPPOSED?
20:46:33 MOTION CARRIED.
20:46:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECONDLY, MR. CHAIRMAN, I DON'T KNOW
20:46:37 IF WE GOT IT DURING THE MORNING HEARING, BUT THE ITEMS
20:46:42 THAT THE CITY PERSONNEL ON THE LAST WORKSHOP THAT WE HAD
20:46:44 EARLY IN THE MORNING, IF THEY COULD BE BROUGHT UP TO THE
20:46:48 FIRST PART OF IT WHEN WE START THE MEETING BACK WHEN THEY
20:46:51 COME BACK TO US.
20:46:53 IN OTHER WORDS, HAD A REQUEST, MAYBE WROTE IT OUT, BUT
20:46:56 KIND OF HARD.
20:46:58 FIRST MEETING WE HAD THIS MORNING, ASK THE CHAIRMAN TO
20:47:02 PLACE THE ITEMS THAT THE CITY PERSONNEL AT THE BEGINNING
20:47:04 OF THE WORKSHOP THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE COMING UP SO
20:47:07 THAT THEY DON'T HAVE -- SO THEY CAN GO BACK TO THEIR
20:47:10 POST.
20:47:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHICH ITEM?
20:47:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT WAS PROBABLY THE LAND DEVELOPMENT.
20:47:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OKAY.
20:47:17 MR. MIRANDA MADE A MOTION.
20:47:19 SECONDED BY MR. VIERA.
20:47:20 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:47:21 ANY OPPOSED?
20:47:22 MOTION CARRIED.
20:47:23 MR. DINGFELDER.
20:47:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M GOOD TONIGHT.
20:47:26 THANK YOU.
20:47:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO?
20:47:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
20:47:29 FELLOW COUNCILMEN, OCTOBER 24th IS ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
20:47:38 WORLD POLIO DAY.
20:47:39 AND THEIR HOPE, OUR HOPE, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER AND
20:47:45 MYSELF WHO HAPPEN TO BE PART OF YBOR CITY ROTARY, OUR
20:47:48 HOPE IS TO ERADICATE POLIO WITHIN OUR LIFETIME.
20:47:51 WE'VE BEEN WORKING TOGETHER WITH THE WORLD HEALTH
20:47:55 ORGANIZATION, THE UNITED STATES CDC, UNICEF, AND THE
20:48:00 BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION TO HELP IMMUNIZE CHILDREN
20:48:07 AROUND THE WORLD AGAINST POLIO.
20:48:09 WITH YOUR PERMISSION, LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A
20:48:12 COMMENDATION TO ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ON OCTOBER 21st,
20:48:15 THE THURSDAY BEFORE WORLD POLIO DAY.
20:48:18 WE ALREADY HAVE THREE COMMENDATIONS.
20:48:20 I'M HOPING TO BE ABLE TO DO AT THAT TIME THE CEREMONIES.
20:48:26 THAT WAS THE 21st OF OCTOBER.
20:48:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. CITRO.
20:48:32 SECONDED BY MR. DINGFELDER.
20:48:34 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:48:35 MOTION CARRIED.
20:48:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
20:48:38 ONE LAST THING FROM ME.
20:48:40 COUNCILMAN VIERA, COUNCILMAN GUDES, YOU KNOW THAT WE WENT
20:48:42 THROUGH THE CITIZENS FIRE ACADEMY TOGETHER.
20:48:48 YES, YOU DID.
20:48:48 YOUR LOVELY WIFE WAS THERE, TOO.
20:48:51 I WANT TO MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT I MADE MY FIRST BOAT
20:48:54 RESCUE.
20:48:56 THE CREW OF BOAT 17, WHICH ACTUALLY THE CREW OF STATION
20:49:01 19 TOOK ME OUT DURING THE PRIDE PARADE.
20:49:04 WE WITNESSED A YOUNG LADY FALL OVER OFF THE DOCK AND INTO
20:49:08 THE WATER, AND I WAS ALL ELBOWS PUSHING ALL THE
20:49:12 FIREFIGHTERS OUT OF THE WAY JUST TO HELP HER GET OUT OF
20:49:15 THE WATER.
20:49:16 THANK THE CREW OF STATION 19 FOR ALLOWING ME TO TRAVEL
20:49:19 ALONG.
20:49:28 >> THERE WAS A BOAT BEFORE SHOOTING OFF THESE T-SHIRTS
20:49:32 AND SHE WENT TO GO GRAB IT AND FELL IN THE WATER.
20:49:35 BUT I GOT MY FIRST RESCUE.
20:49:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY TO BRING THIS UP
20:49:40 ABOUT THE PREVIOUS MOTION OF COUNCILMAN CITRO, BUT I WANT
20:49:43 TO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO OCTOBER 21st FOR TWO
20:49:46 REASONS.
20:49:46 NUMBER ONE IS THERE ARE ACTUALLY ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR,
20:49:52 FIVE, BETWEEN THE COMMENDATIONS AND THE PRESENTATION, I
20:49:55 JUST REMIND YOU THAT ON THE 21st, YOU HAVE F.D.O.T.
20:50:00 DOING THEIR REPORT AT 9:00 IN THE MORNING AND YOU ALSO
20:50:03 HAVE A FIVE-MINUTE PRESENTATION BY SHERRY SILK ON TOP OF
20:50:07 THE COMMENDATIONS.
20:50:09 THAT IS NOT AS SIGNIFICANT AS THE FACT THAT YOU MAY
20:50:12 REMEMBER THAT THERE IS A HEARING THAT IS THE DECISION OF
20:50:19 THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR THAT WAS GRANTED THAT'S BEING
20:50:22 ASKED FOR REVIEW.
20:50:23 SO A SPECIAL REVIEW HEARING WAS SET, WHICH IS REALLY A
20:50:27 THIRD-PARTY REVIEW.
20:50:28 IT WAS SET -- OR DECISION -- FOR 1:30 IN THE AFTERNOON
20:50:34 TIME CERTAIN.
20:50:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE'LL MAKE IT WORK.
20:50:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M ASKING YOU TO REMEMBER THAT STAFF
20:50:42 REPORTS MAY HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER YOU DO THE REVIEW
20:50:45 HEARING AT 1:30.
20:50:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE HAVE TWO MEMBERS WHO ARE THE ROTARY
20:50:49 CLUB AND THE POLIO, THEY WORK WITH THE GROUPS AND WE JUST
20:50:57 DON'T WANT TO NOT LET THEM GET RECOGNIZED.
20:51:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH
20:51:02 THAT.
20:51:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I PROMISE I WILL KEEP IT VERY BRIEF.
20:51:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON?
20:51:08 MR. VIERA?
20:51:10 >>LUIS VIERA: I'VE GOT A FEW, IF I MAY.
20:51:12 I WANT TO RATIFY AND CONFIRM A COMMENDATION THAT I
20:51:15 ALREADY PRESENTED TO GRAND HAMPTON ANTHONY CAPERS, LONG
20:51:21 STORY SHORT.
20:51:22 THEY MADE A MOVIE CALLED GRAND HAMPTON, THE MOVIE WITH
20:51:25 ABOUT 50 COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
20:51:27 IT'S REALLY, REALLY FUNNY.
20:51:31 IT'S A FAMILY AFFAIR, ET CETERA.
20:51:32 AND I PRESENTED GRAND HAMPTON, THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'S A
20:51:36 NEIGHBORHOOD IN NEW TAMPA COMMENDATION.
20:51:40 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:51:41 MOTION BY MR. VIERA.
20:51:43 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:51:44 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:51:45 ANY OPPOSED?
20:51:47 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:51:48 A COUPLE MORE, IF I MAY.
20:51:49 I MOTION FOR CITY OF TAMPA TO REPORT ON JANUARY 13th ON
20:51:54 THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING A COMPLAINT REGISTRY FOR
20:51:57 LANDLORDS AND THAT THIS REPORT BE BROUGHT BACK TO US AT
20:52:01 THAT TIME.
20:52:01 I'M WORKING WITH SOME FOLKS, COMMUNITY FOLKS LIKE ROBIN
20:52:04 LOCKETT AND OTHERS ON THIS AND I WILL BE DISCUSSING THIS
20:52:08 WITH STAFF.
20:52:08 I PUT IT OFF FAR ENOUGH SO THAT WE COULD HAVE MORE THAN
20:52:11 AMPLE TIME.
20:52:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:52:14 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:52:16 OPPOSED?
20:52:16 MOTION CARRIED.
20:52:18 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, SIR.
20:52:19 I MOTION FOR COMMENDATION TO BE PRESENTED TO THE
20:52:21 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION.
20:52:22 I WOULD ASK THAT IF YOU WOULD COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER
20:52:25 SECOND THIS AS WE'RE THE LAWYERS ON THIS, IN HONOR OF THE
20:52:29 GROUP'S UPCOMING 125th ANNIVERSARY AT OUR DECEMBER
20:52:32 2nd CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
20:52:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDED BY MR. DINGFELDER.
20:52:35 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:52:36 ANY OPPOSED?
20:52:38 >>LUIS VIERA: AND THEN LASTLY, THIS IS ACTUALLY REDUCING
20:52:43 THE AGENDA BUT EXTENDING OUR TIME TODAY.
20:52:46 WE HAVE AN OCTOBER 28th WORKSHOP.
20:52:49 JUST GIVEN WHAT HAPPENED ON THE WORKSHOP TODAY, I
20:52:51 WOULDN'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN ON THIS SUBJECT BECAUSE I
20:52:53 THINK IT'S SO IMPORTANT.
20:52:55 I MOTIONED AND I WAS GETTING FOLKS TOGETHER FOR A
20:52:58 SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE WORKSHOP AND I JUST DON'T WANT
20:53:01 THAT TO BE SQUEEZED OUT GIVEN THE FACT THAT IT'S SO
20:53:04 IMPORTANT.
20:53:05 I WOULD MOVE IT TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE, JANUARY 27th
20:53:08 WORKSHOP -- I GUESS THAT WOULD BE ITEM NUMBER 4, IF I
20:53:11 MAY.
20:53:12 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:53:13 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:53:14 ANY OPPOSED?
20:53:16 >>LUIS VIERA: AND 26 MORE.
20:53:17 I'M JOKING.
20:53:18 THANK YOU.
20:53:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
20:53:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MY TURN.
20:53:21 I ONLY HAVE ONE.
20:53:23 JUST ONE SECOND, SIR.
20:53:24 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECOGNIZE THE CITY OF
20:53:28 TAMPA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FOR ACHIEVING A
20:53:32 NATIONAL GOLD MEDAL FOR EXCELLENCE IN THE FIELD OF PARKS
20:53:36 AND RECREATION.
20:53:37 THIS OCCURRED AT THE NATIONAL RECREATION PARKS
20:53:40 ASSOCIATION HELD IN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE ON SEPTEMBER 21,
20:53:44 2021.
20:53:45 COMMENDATION PRESENTED ON OCTOBER 28, 2021.
20:53:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: BE PRESENTED OFF-SITE, IS THAT WHAT YOU
20:53:52 SAID, SIR?
20:53:52 OH, TO BE PRESENTED --
20:53:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: 28th.
20:53:56 SHOULD BE OKAY.
20:54:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE HAVE A MOTION.
20:54:02 WHO WAS THE SECOND?
20:54:03 MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.
20:54:04 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
20:54:06 ANY OPPOSED?
20:54:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY HAS SOMETHING.
20:54:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, COUNCIL.
20:54:14 I BELIEVE YOU'VE ALL RECEIVED LETTERS FROM THE PLANNING
20:54:16 COMMISSION THAT HAVE MENTIONED TO YOU THAT THEY ARE
20:54:19 BEGINNING THE PROCESS OF REDISTRICTING.
20:54:24 AND THEY HAVE REQUESTED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
20:54:27 STAFF AND THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS OFFICE APPEAR
20:54:33 BEFORE CITY COUNCIL, AND THEY'VE AGREED FOR OCTOBER 7th
20:54:38 PRESENTATION.
20:54:39 IT SHOULD TAKE ABOUT 15 MINUTES AT 9 A.M.
20:54:42 AND THESE WOULD BE THE PROCESS FOR INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL
20:54:46 DISTRICTS FOUR, FIVE, SIX, AND SEVEN, WHICH WOULD BE IN
20:54:49 EFFECT FOR THE MARCH 2023 MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.
20:54:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.
20:54:52 MOTION TO MOVE THAT?
20:54:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED.
20:54:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVED BY MR. DINGFELDER.
20:54:58 SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.
20:55:00 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:55:01 ANY OPPOSED?
20:55:02 MOTION CARRIED.
20:55:03 RECEIVE AND FILE.
20:55:04 MR. MIRANDA.
20:55:05 SECONDED BY MR. CITRO.
20:55:07 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:55:08 WE ARE ADJOURNED.
20:55:08
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR
COMPLETE ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.