Help & information    View the list of Transcripts


TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2022
5:01 P.M.

DISCLAIMER:

THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.

04:59:12

05:01:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: CITY COUNCIL IS NOW CALLED TO ORDER.

05:04:55 OCTOBER 14, 2021, 5:01 P.M.

05:05:00 ROLL CALL.

05:05:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.

05:05:00 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.

05:05:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE.

05:05:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.

05:05:03 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.

05:05:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.

05:05:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.

05:05:06 >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.

05:05:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MADAM CLERK.

05:05:09 MR. SHELBY, PLEASE.

05:05:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: GOOD EVENING.

05:05:15 MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.

05:05:18 AS THE CHAIR SAID,

05:05:22 YOU HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT LIVE IN CHAMBERS AND




05:05:24 TONIGHT LAND USE AND QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS ARE BEING

05:05:28 CONDUCTED IN LIGHT OF THE CONTINUING COVID-19 GOVERNMENT

05:05:34 ISSUED HEALTH STANDARDS FOR GUIDANCE IN EFFECT.

05:05:36 BECAUSE OF THAT, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHALL HAVE THE

05:05:38 ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY THROUGH VIDEO

05:05:40 TELECONFERENCING WHICH IS REFERRED TO BY FLORIDA STATUTES

05:05:43 AND RULES AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY.

05:05:46 THE PUBLIC AND THE CITIZENS OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH THIS

05:05:50 AND LISTEN AND VIEW THIS MEETING ON SPECTRUM CHANNEL 640,

05:05:53 FRONTIER CHANNEL 15, AND ON THE INTERNET AT

05:05:56 TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.

05:06:00 NOW, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO PARTICIPATE IN

05:06:03 TONIGHT'S MEETING, AND THOSE HAVE BEEN LISTED IN THE NOTICE

05:06:09 OF HEARING, AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT

05:06:13 TAMPA.GOV/CITYCOUNCIL, ONE WORD.

05:06:18 NOW, FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY THROUGH

05:06:22 COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY, PREAPPLICATION WAS REQUIRED

05:06:27 AND THAT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY OF TAMPA'S

05:06:31 CITY COUNCIL WEB PAGE AND ALSO AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.

05:06:37 ALSO, COUNCIL, THE OTHER WAYS PEOPLE CAN PARTICIPATE ARE

05:06:41 THROUGH WRITING BY E-MAIL, AND IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO

05:06:45 PARTICIPATE IN PERSON, AND DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE CMT

05:06:50 DEVICE, THEY CAN COME TO THE SECOND FLOOR, THE SECOND FLOOR

05:06:53 OF OLD CITY HALL AND USE THE CMT FACILITIES THAT ARE MADE

05:06:58 AVAILABLE THIS EVENING TO THE PUBLIC, AND PLEASE BE REMINDED




05:07:02 THAT THOSE ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON SHOULD WEAR FACE

05:07:05 MASKS INSIDE OLD CITY HALL.

05:07:07 ALSO, MR. CHAIRMAN, I AM GOING TO ASK THE PEOPLE ON THE

05:07:10 SECOND FLOOR TO PLEASE REMAIN QUIET, THAT IF YOU SHOULD TALK

05:07:15 THAT YOU TALK IN A WHISPER OR LOW VOICE OR TAKE YOUR

05:07:18 COMMENTS PERHAPS TO THE THIRD FLOOR IF YOU NEED TO DISCUSS

05:07:21 SO THE SOUND DOES NOT TRAVEL AND THE HEARINGS CAN BE

05:07:23 CONDUCTED EFFICIENTLY.

05:07:26 WRITTEN COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED HAVE BEEN

05:07:28 DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE

05:07:30 PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEETING.

05:07:32 ALL COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN TIMELY RECEIVED BY MAIL, HE MAIL

05:07:35 OR VIA CMT WILL BE AFFORDED EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE

05:07:40 PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON.

05:07:42 ONE LAST COMMENT WITH REGARD TO THE PLATFORM VIRTUALLY,

05:07:46 GO-TO-MEETING, THERE IS A CHAT BOX.

05:07:48 THAT CHAT BOX IS NOT TO BE USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH CITY

05:07:51 COUNCIL MEMBERS.

05:07:52 THAT'S ONLY TO BE USED IF YOU HAVE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS.

05:07:55 PLEASE DO NOT COMMUNICATE USING THE CHAT BOX UNLESS IT'S FOR

05:07:59 A TECHNICAL ISSUE.

05:08:01 THAT BEING THE CASE, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I

05:08:03 WOULD ASK THAT YOU WAIVE THE RULES AND ADOPT THESE RULES

05:08:06 CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S IN THE NOTICE IN THE AGENDA RELATIVE

05:08:09 TO VIRTUAL TYPE PROCEEDING.




05:08:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO WAIVE THE RULES.

05:08:14 MR. MIRANDA MADE THE MOTION, MR. CITRO SECOND.

05:08:17 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:08:18 OPPOSED?

05:08:19 MOTION CARRIED.

05:08:20 MR. SHELBY, LET'S GO THROUGH THE AGENDA, PLEASE.

05:08:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SURE, MR. CHAIRMAN.

05:08:25 IF YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM THE CITY STAFF.

05:08:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHO DO WE HAVE?

05:08:39 >>ANNIE BARNES: WE HAVE A FEW ITEMS TO CLEAN UP WITH YOU.

05:08:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: CAN YOU GIVE A LITTLE MORE VOLUME IN THE

05:08:47 COUNCIL, PLEASE?

05:08:50 WE CAN'T HEAR.

05:08:50 TRY AGAIN.

05:08:51 >>ANNIE BARNES: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.

05:08:54 ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

05:08:59 THE FIRST ITEM IS NUMBER 2, REZ 21-05.

05:09:02 THE APPLICANT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS APPLICATION.

05:09:05 CAN YOU PLEASE REMOVE THIS APPLICATION FROM THE AGENDA?

05:09:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO, SECOND BY MR. VIERA.

05:09:11 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:09:12 OPPOSED?

05:09:13 MOTION CARRIED.

05:09:13 >>ANNIE BARNES: ITEM 8, REZ THE 1-81.

05:09:22 PLEASE REMOVE THIS APPLICATION FROM THE AGENDA.




05:09:25 NOTICE HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED.

05:09:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA, MR. CITRO.

05:09:30 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:09:31 OPPOSED?

05:09:32 MOTION CARRIED.

05:09:32 >>ANNIE BARNES: 21-ON THE AND ITEM NUMBER 10, REZ 21-86,

05:09:38 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CONTINUE BOTH APPLICATIONS TO

05:09:42 THE DECEMBER 9TH, 2021 COUNCIL HEARINGS.

05:09:47 PLEASE REMOVE THESE AS WELL.

05:09:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 9 --

05:09:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: 3 AND 10.

05:09:53 AND MR. CHAIRMAN, PLEASE ASK THE APPLICANT TO COME UP.

05:09:56 >>ORLANDO GUDES: IS THE APPLICANT HERE?

05:10:07 >> TYLER HUDSON, ASHLEY DRIVE. CAN YOU SEE ME?

05:10:15 WE ARE A CONTINUANCE TO DECEMBER 9th FOR THESE PAIR OF

05:10:17 HEARINGS, ONE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE OTHER A REZONING.

05:10:20 WE JUST NEED A ABOUT H ABOUT 60 MORE DAYS TO CLEAN UP A FEW

05:10:23 MORE ITEMS TO MAKE THE APPLICATION AS COMPLETE AS POSSIBLE,

05:10:27 PRESSURE YOUR -- APPRECIATE YOUR MOTION TO CONTINUE TO

05:10:30 DECEMBER 9th.

05:10:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN.

05:10:33 ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS REAL FIVE TO 3 OR 10,

05:10:36 MADAM CLERK?

05:10:37 >>THE CLERK: NO.

05:10:43 OTHER THAN THE APPLICANT, OR REPRESENTATIVE.




05:10:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST A REMINDER AND TO

05:10:51 THOSE WATCH WATCHING ON TELEVISION, WE JUST HAVE TO VERIFY

05:10:56 THE DATE AND TIME AND SEE IF IT'S IN THE CALENDAR.

05:10:59 IF WE CAN CONFIRM THAT WITH STAFF.

05:11:03 YOU ARE REQUESTING WHEN, SIR?

05:11:05 >>TYLER HUDSON: DECEMBER 9th.

05:11:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. BARNES?

05:11:11 >>ANNIE BARNES: 5:01 P.M., THERE ARE ON DECEMBER 9th,

05:11:15 THERE WILL BE A TOTAL OF 13 REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT

05:11:18 NIGHT.

05:11:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THIS WOULD BE THE MAXIMUM, I GUESS, AT

05:11:23 THIS POINT, UNLESS COUNCIL WISHES TO WAIVE THE RULES.

05:11:29 MR. CHAIRMAN, AGAIN, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DISCUSS HOW, ON

05:11:33 MONDAY, WE MOVE FORWARD PAST THAT.

05:11:35 BUT IF THAT'S THE APPLICATION, IF THERE IS A SLOT AVAILABLE

05:11:39 PURSUANT TO YOUR CURRENT DIRECTION, I BELIEVE THAT WOULD BE

05:11:42 APPROPRIATE FOR COUNCIL'S DISCRETION.

05:11:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO

05:11:48 THE REQUEST?

05:11:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR MR. HUDSON, ARE YOU THERE?

05:11:54 >>TYLER HUDSON: YES, SIR.

05:11:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WHAT IS THE HARDSHIP THAT YOU ARE NEEDING

05:11:57 THIS CONTINUANCE FOR?

05:11:59 >>TYLER HUDSON: SURE.

05:12:00 SO OF THIS IS -- THIS PROPERTY COMPRISES A FULL CITY BLOCK




05:12:06 AND THERE IS A HISTORIC STRUCTURE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER.

05:12:09 THAT STRUCTURE IS SUBJECT TO A CERTIFICATE OF

05:12:10 APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION THAT WILL BE HEARD ON DECEMBER

05:12:13 6th AND WE WOULD LIKE TO BEFORE YOU ON DECEMBER 9th

05:12:18 THE CONFIRMATION THAT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED.

05:12:21 I THINK IT'S GOING TO MAKE FOR A SIMPLER STORY.

05:12:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DECEMBER 9th?

05:12:29 >>TYLER HUDSON: IT IS.

05:12:30 IT IS A CONTRACTUAL DEADLINE THAT THIS MUST BE -- THE FIRST

05:12:33 READING MUST HAPPEN UNDER THE CONTRACTS THIS YEAR, DECEMBER,

05:12:37 AND WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT.

05:12:41 WE ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY OPPOSITION AT THIS TIME, AND

05:12:44 UNDERSTANDING COUNCIL'S BUSY SCHEDULE, IT WILL BE A MUCH

05:12:48 MORE EFFICIENT PRESENTATION AT THAT TIME, AND WILL BE VERY

05:12:51 RESPECTFUL OF YOUR TIME AS WE ALWAYS TRY TO DO.

05:12:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO CONTINUE 3 AND 10 TO DECEMBER

05:12:59 9th.

05:13:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AT 5:01 P.M.

05:13:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GO ALONG WITH

05:13:08 THE DATE BECAUSE MONDAY IS GOING TO BE D-DAY AND WE ARE

05:13:12 GOING TO MAKE DECISIONS ON MONDAY ABOUT CONTINUANCES.

05:13:18 I WILL ENTERTAIN THE MOTION TONIGHT.

05:13:22 AND GIVE MR. HUDSON THAT LEEWAY.

05:13:24 BUT AFTER TONIGHT, HOPEFULLY, GET THIS THING GOING.

05:13:30 MR. DINGFELDER MADE A MOTION.




05:13:32 MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.

05:13:33 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:13:35 ANY OPPOSED?

05:13:36 MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

05:13:38 >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER TO THE PUBLIC THAT THOSE

05:13:41 ITEMS THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER NOTICE.

05:13:44 THEY ARE CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 9th, 2022 AT 5:01 P.M.

05:13:51 >>TYLER HUDSON: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.

05:13:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.

05:13:55 >>ANNIE BARNES: THE LAST ITEM, NUMBER 6, IS 21-77.

05:14:03 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CONTINUE THE APPLICATION TO

05:14:09 NOVEMBER 18, 2022.

05:14:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN, MAY I INQUIRE?

05:14:18 THANK YOU.

05:14:18 IS NOVEMBER 18th AVAILABLE FOR THIS CONTINUANCE?

05:14:22 >>ANNIE BARNES: YES.

05:14:25 THERE WILL BE A TOTAL OF 12 CASES CONTINUED.

05:14:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE I SEE MS. CORBETT ONLINE.

05:14:34 >>KAMI CORBETT: KAMI CORBETT, HILL, WARD, HENDERSON.

05:14:37 WE DID SEND IN A LETTER ON TUESDAY AFTERNOON REQUESTING A

05:14:40 CONTINUANCE TO THE NOVEMBER 18th CITY COUNCIL DATE.

05:14:44 WE ARE READY TO GO BUT BEFORE -- WE REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE

05:14:49 BECAUSE WE ARE WORKING WITH BEACH PARK AND SOME OF THE OTHER

05:14:52 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS OVER THERE, AND WE ARE WORKING ON

05:14:56 SPECIFICALLY TRYING TO REASSIGN THE PROPERTY TO A LESS




05:15:00 CONGESTED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND WERE HOPING WE WOULD BE

05:15:03 FURTHER ALONG WITH THAT PROCESS THAN WE ARE TODAY, SO IN

05:15:06 GOOD FAITH WE AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS CASE TO NOVEMBER

05:15:09 19th AT THEIR REQUEST BECAUSE THEY WOULD LIKE SOME

05:15:13 FURTHER ASSURANCES FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD THAT THIS IS GOING

05:15:15 TO HAPPEN, AND OBVIOUSLY THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THAT WE COULD

05:15:18 CONDITION THE ZONING ON SO WE AGREED TO GO AHEAD AND REQUEST

05:15:21 A CONTINUANCE AND WE KNOW THAT WITHIN THE LETTER THAT WE

05:15:25 WAIVED THE 180-DAY TIME FRAME AND WOULD RESPECT FRIDAY

05:15:28 REQUEST YOU APPROVE IT.

05:15:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

05:15:32 AS A CAUTIONARY, I BELIEVE, AND I AM NOT TRYING TO BE TAKE

05:15:35 SIDES WITH EITHER ONE HERE, BUT I THINK THIS IS YOUR SECOND

05:15:37 OR THIRD CONTINUANCE.

05:15:39 AM I CORRECT?

05:15:41 >>KAMI CORBETT: THIS IS OUR FIRST SCHEDULED HEARING DATE.

05:15:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: OKAY.

05:15:46 THEN THERE MUST BE ANOTHER ONE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:15:48 I'M SORRY, I APOLOGIZE.

05:15:50 >>KAMI CORBETT: THIS IS OUR FIRST.

05:15:51 WE WERE READY TO GO.

05:15:54 BUT TIME WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD -- OKAY, THANKS.

05:15:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC RECOLLECTION OF

05:16:05 THE HEARING TONIGHT BEING OPENED, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE

05:16:08 THAT THE ONES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN CONTINUED ARE OPENED




05:16:12 AND CONTINUED SO I BELIEVE A MOTION --

05:16:15 >> MOVE TO OPEN.

05:16:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WE HAVE TO DO WHAT WE HAVE TO DO BUT I

05:16:21 WANT TO MAKE SURE THE HEARINGS ARE OPEN WHEN WE CONTINUE

05:16:23 THEM, AND I DON'T BELIEVE --

05:16:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MOVED IT, MR. MANISCALCO

05:16:29 SECONDED IT.

05:16:31 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:16:32 OPPOSED?

05:16:33 WE ARE OPEN.

05:16:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY, WAS THERE A MOTION?

05:16:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I AM ABOUT READY TO MAKE IT.

05:16:39 FILE REZ 21-77, I MOVE THAT THEY BE CONTINUED UNTIL NOVEMBER

05:16:44 18th AT 5:01 P.M.

05:16:47 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.

05:16:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MOVED, MR. MIRANDA SECONDED.

05:16:52 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:16:53 OPPOSED?

05:16:53 >>KAMI CORBETT: THANK YOU.

05:17:03 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

05:17:04 THERE ARE NO OTHER HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS.

05:17:07 HOWEVER, I DO REQUEST THAT STAFF BE SWORN IN AT THIS TIME.

05:17:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 8 CANNOT BE HEARD.

05:17:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE ITEM NUMBER 8 WAS REMOVED.

05:17:19 >>ANNIE BARNES: ITEM NUMBER 8, REZ 21-81, THE APPLICATION




05:17:37 CANNOT BE HEARD BECAUSE NOTICE WAS NOT PERFECTED.

05:17:41 PLEASE REMOVE THAT FROM THE AGENDA.

05:17:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NUMBER 8.

05:17:46 >>THE CLERK: MR. MANISCALCO MADE THE MOTION AND MR. CITRO

05:17:48 SECONDED IT.

05:17:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

05:17:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: ITEM NUMBER 1 IS NOT QUASI-JUDICIAL.

05:17:53 YOU CAN TAKE THAT UP IF YOU WISH.

05:17:55 AND THEN COME BACK TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS.

05:17:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. BARNES?

05:18:04 >>ANNIE BARNES: YES.

05:18:06 THEN BEFORE WE CONTINUE THE STAFF NEEDS TO BE SWORN IN.

05:18:14 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).

05:18:16 >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU.

05:18:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 1.

05:18:30 >>MCLANE EVANS: ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.

05:18:32 THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 1.

05:18:34 BEFORE YOU IS THE FIRST TWO OF PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE

05:18:36 COUNCIL FROM PROPOSED PRESENTATION OF A BROWNFIELD AREA

05:18:40 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3626.

05:18:43 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4110 GEORGE ROAD.

05:18:48 CITY OF TAMPA ROAD.

05:18:56 IT'S A BROWNFIELD AREA, AND MEDIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL

05:19:00 IMPACT ON THE PROPERTY.

05:19:03 STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND DETERMINED IT MEETS THE




05:19:06 CRITERIA FOR BROWNFIELD AREA DESIGNATION.

05:19:09 IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENT, HEARING ON MONDAY,

05:19:14 DECEMBER 13th.

05:19:18 DETAILS OF THE DESIGNATION, STAFF REPORT PROPOSED BROWNFIELD

05:19:25 AREA DESIGNATION, AND AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AT CITY

05:19:31 CLERK'S OFFICE.

05:19:32 AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE SECOND HEARING WHICH IS SCHEDULED

05:19:35 FOR NOVEMBER 4 AT 9 A.M., COUNCIL WILL HAVE A OPPORTUNITIES

05:19:38 TO PASS THE AREA AS A BROWNFIELD AREA.

05:19:43 THE PURPOSE OF THIS EVENING'S HEARING IS TO TAKE PUBLIC

05:19:46 COMMENT.

05:19:46 NO OTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED BY COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM TODAY.

05:19:49 STAFF AND I ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY

05:19:52 HAVE.

05:19:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?

05:19:54 ANY QUESTIONS?

05:19:56 ALL RIGHT.

05:19:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU COULD OPEN IT, PLEASE, IT'S A

05:20:06 PUBLIC HEARING.

05:20:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

05:20:08 ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR?

05:20:18 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE HERE.

05:20:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD EVENING, AILEEN.

05:20:22 >>THE CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.

05:20:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SO MS. EVANS, NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE




05:20:30 TAKEN BY COUNCIL TONIGHT?

05:20:32 >>MCLANE EVANS: TAKING PUBLIC COMMENT.

05:20:36 OTHER THAN THAT, THAT CONCLUDES OUR BUSINESS.

05:20:39 WE CAN CLOSE THE HEARING.

05:20:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE

05:20:45 NOVEMBER 4th at 9 a.m.

05:20:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: Mr. Maniscalco to close, seconded.

05:20:51 All in favor?

05:20:53 Opposed?

05:20:53 Motion carried.

05:20:54 Item number 2 we did.

05:20:59 Item number 4.

05:20:59 >>ANNIE BARNES: REZ 21-42.

05:21:03 Subject property is located at 411 east Palm Avenue.

05:21:06 The request is to rezone the property from planned

05:21:09 development to planned development to allow development of

05:21:12 residential single-family semi-detached and residential

05:21:15 studio dwelling.

05:21:17 Alternative presentations of the Planning Commission, then

05:21:20 after their presentation I will conclude my report.

05:21:24 >>JENNIFER MALONE: Planning Commission.

05:21:28 May I share my screen?

05:21:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: You have been sworn, correct?

05:21:33 >>JENNIFER MALONE: I have been sworn.

05:21:38 So this is located in the central Tampa district, Tampa




05:21:47 HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.

05:21:49 THERE IS A TRANSIT STOP ADJACENT TO THE SITE, EAST PALM

05:21:53 AVENUE.

05:21:54 THE SITE IS NOT IN AN EVACUATION ZONE.

05:21:59 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST PALM, WEST

05:22:07 OF THE INTERSTATE 275.

05:22:10 THERE ARE SOME OFFICE BUILDINGS TO THE NORTH.

05:22:15 NORTHWEST YOU HAVE THE TAMPA HEIGHTS JUNIOR CIVIC

05:22:17 ASSOCIATION IN THE AREA AND SOUTH.

05:22:25 ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE, FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, IT'S

05:22:30 PRIMARILY -- THE LIGHTER BROWN COLOR IS 5 AND TO THE EAST

05:22:37 URBAN 60. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

05:22:43 PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW 4 DWELLING UNITS ON THE SITE,

05:22:47 OVERALL DENSITY OF 18 UNITS PER ACRE WITH I IS CONSISTENT

05:22:50 WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL 83, 83 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

05:22:55 A LITTLE LOWER THAN THAT MAXIMUM.

05:22:59 ALSO FROM A DESIGN PERSPECTIVE WE ARE SUPPORTIVE OF THE

05:23:01 UNITS UTILIZING ALLEYS ON THE PLAN, A BOUNDARY AT THE SITE,

05:23:08 SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND LASTLY SUPPORTS THE

05:23:12 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY AS RELATES TO HOUSING, THE POPULATION.

05:23:16 WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE'S AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING.

05:23:21 TO MEET THE GROWING POPULATION, UTILIZING --

05:23:27 AND IT IS WITHIN THE URBAN VILLAGE.

05:23:32 [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

05:23:36 I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.




05:23:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?

05:23:40 ALL RIGHT.

05:23:40 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

05:23:45 CAN I PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?

05:24:04 ALL RIGHT.

05:24:04 DID YOU SEE MY SCREEN?

05:24:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN.

05:24:09 >> AGAIN, THE APPLICANT IS PETITIONING TO REZONE 411 EAST

05:24:14 PALM AVENUE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

05:24:17 TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY

05:24:21 SEMI-DETACHED AND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.

05:24:25 STUDIO DWELLING.

05:24:27 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A WAIVER TO ALLOW PARKING IN A

05:24:31 NONSTRUCTURALLY INTEGRATED GARAGE AND THE SECOND TO REDUCE

05:24:34 PARKING, REQUIRED PARKING FROM 9 TO 8 SPACES WHICH IS AN 11%

05:24:39 REDUCTION.

05:24:40 THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF LOT LINES, BLOCK 4 OF THE FUCHS

05:24:45 SUBDIVISION PLATTED IN 1895 SHOWN HERE.

05:24:50 THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SITE SHOWN HERE IS ABOUT 8900 SQUARE

05:24:56 FEET OR .2 ACRES IN SIZE.

05:25:00 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

05:25:09 AND TWO RESIDENTIAL STUDIO UNITS, AS YOU CAN SEE, ACCESS IS

05:25:15 PROVIDED FROM EAST PALM AVENUE FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY

05:25:20 SEMI-DETACHED UNITS, AND VEHICULAR ACCESS PROVIDED IN THE

05:25:23 ALLEY FOR THE STUDIO DWELLINGS.




05:25:28 THE ELEVATIONS HAVE PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED

05:25:33 STRUCTURES, AND THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPOSED

05:25:36 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS ABOVE THE GARAGE.

05:25:41 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING ZONING.

05:25:44 PROPERTY DIRECTLY NORTHEAST AND WEST OF THE SITE IS RM-24

05:25:52 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.

05:25:57 HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS YOU CAN SEE IT'S

05:25:59 CURRENTLY VACANT.

05:26:02 SHOWN HERE IS PROPERTY LOOKING ACROSS NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE

05:26:05 AND DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SITE.

05:26:08 SHOWN HERE IS PROPERTY AGAIN EAST OF THE SITE FACING I-275.

05:26:15 SHOWN HERE IS ACROSS NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST OF

05:26:19 THE SITE.

05:26:22 MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED.

05:26:25 AND THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF EAST PALM AVENUE AND CENTRAL

05:26:28 AVENUE NORTH DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

05:26:33 THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE

05:26:36 APPLICATION AND FOUND IT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF

05:26:38 TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.

05:26:40 PLEASE REFER TO TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS FOR OVERALL

05:26:43 INCONSISTENCY FINDING.

05:26:45 MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE

05:26:48 APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

05:26:51 AS STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET.

05:26:53 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.




05:26:54 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

05:26:56 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?

05:26:58 ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?

05:27:01 SEEING NO ONE, THE APPLICANT?

05:27:06 HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN, SIR?

05:27:07 >> GOOD EVENING.

05:27:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN, SIR?

05:27:12 >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN.

05:27:13 THANK YOU.

05:27:14 GOOD EVENING.

05:27:16 RALPH SCHULER, ARCHITECT, 2401 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE, AGENT

05:27:20 FOR THE APPLICANT.

05:27:21 THE APPLICATION THAT CITY STAFF DESCRIBED AS PART OF THE

05:27:26 FINAL STAFF REPORT BEFORE YOU IS A SINGLE-FAMILY

05:27:28 SEMI-DETACHED DEVELOPMENT WITH TWO UNITS BEING ON PALM

05:27:32 AVENUE, WHICH REFLECT A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME BUT ACTUALLY IS A

05:27:37 DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE, SIMILAR PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALM

05:27:42 AVENUE, AND/OR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACE AROUND ADJACENT.

05:27:48 WE ALSO HAVE TWO ADDITIONAL UNITS OVER THE GARAGE, BOTH

05:27:53 STUDIO ONE BEDROOM, THAT ALLOWS FOR SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT

05:27:59 STALE OF OTHER UNITS WITHIN THIS AREA.

05:28:05 I WANT TO GO TO THE ZONING MAP.

05:28:13 AS DESCRIBED BY STAFF, WE ARE HERE.

05:28:16 WE HAVE SOME OTHER SIMILAR PROPERTIES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF

05:28:22 EAST PALM, AND ANOTHER OLD HISTORIC HOUSE HERE, HERE, HERE




05:28:27 AND THERE.

05:28:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE SECOND.

05:28:33 WE CAN'T SEE IT ON OUR MONITORS ON THE DAIS.

05:28:37 ALL RIGHT.

05:28:38 CONTINUE.

05:28:39 >> DO YOU WANT ME TO REPEAT THAT?

05:28:43 AGAIN THIS IS OUR SUBJECT SITE.

05:28:45 WE HAVE SIMILAR PROPERTIES IN DEVELOPMENT STYLE ALONG THE

05:28:49 SOUTH EDGE OF PALM AVENUE.

05:28:54 HERE AS ANNIE ALLUDED TO, WE ARE IN AN EXTREMELY DENSE

05:28:57 ZONING, PALM AVENUE IS HERE, SO EVERYWHERE SURROUNDING THIS

05:29:05 THE FUTURE LAND USE IS ALREADY -- IT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO UP

05:29:09 TO 15 UNITS HERE WHICH WOULD OBVIOUSLY NEVER WORK, BUT WE

05:29:12 ARE ASKING FOR 4, EXTREMELY APPROPRIATE DENSITY FOR THIS

05:29:19 PARTICULAR LOT.

05:29:38 AGAIN TO REVIEW OUR SITE PLAN, OUR SITE PLAN HAS A COUPLE

05:29:46 SIGNIFICANT THINGS.

05:29:48 FIRST OF ALL, WE HAVE BEEN AND PRESENTED A PROJECT THROUGH

05:29:51 THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AND GOT SUPPORT FOR THIS

05:29:56 PROJECT FOR SEVERAL REASONS.

05:29:58 FIRST AND FOREMOST, WE HAVE AN EXISTING HOUSE HERE AND

05:30:02 EXISTING HOUSE HERE.

05:30:03 WE ARE TAKING A LOT AVERAGE OF THAT HOUSE TO CREATE THE

05:30:05 SETBACK HERE WHICH IS ABOUT 19 FEET.

05:30:08 WE HAVE AGAIN TWO UNITS WHICH WILL WORK LIKE A SINGLE-FAMILY




05:30:14 HOUSE IN SCALE AND MASSING.

05:30:15 THE COURTYARD HERE IN THE MIDDLE, TWO SEPARATE -- I'M SORRY,

05:30:21 TWO, TWO-CAR GARAGES, TO MAKE A PARTY WALL.

05:30:26 AGAIN THE INTENT IS TO REALLY HAVE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY

05:30:31 SEMI-DETACHED PROPERTIES THAT COULD BE SOLD INDEPENDENTLY,

05:30:35 AND SO EACH SIDE, AGAIN VERY TRADITIONAL TOWNHOUSE, A

05:30:42 TWO-CAR GARAGE, A STUDIO ABOVE THE TWO-CAR GARAGE, A PARKING

05:30:48 SPACE FOR THE STUDIO.

05:30:50 ADDITIONAL VISITORS SPACE HERE, WE COME UP WITH 8 SPACES.

05:30:56 THE REASON WHY TRANSPORTATION SAYS WE NEED 9, THEY BELIEVE,

05:30:59 AND THEY ARE CALLING EACH A DWELLING UNIT AND THEY WANT TWO

05:31:03 SPACES FOR EACH STUDIO, WHICH I UNDERSTAND IT MAY BE

05:31:07 TECHNICALLY CORRECT BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S PRACTICAL.

05:31:10 SO WE AGAIN ARE PROVIDING 8 PARKING SPACES.

05:31:15 WE THINK IT'S MORE THAN SUFFICIENT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.

05:31:17 WE ALSO HAVE TWO LARGE CAMPHOR TREES HERE.

05:31:21 WE ARE PROTECTING THOSE CAMPHOR TREES WHICH GOING OVER

05:31:25 SLIGHTLY TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN.

05:31:28 WE HAVE ALL OF OUR AIR CONDITIONING AND OTHER NOT SEEN FROM

05:31:34 THE STREET AS REQUIRED.

05:31:36 THIS ALLEY IS CURRENTLY IMPROVED, AND WE WOULD HAVE ALL OF

05:31:39 OUR ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY EXCEPT FOR JUST A RIBBON DRIVE FOR

05:31:45 VISITOR PARKING.

05:31:48 BRIEFLY SHOW YOU THE ELEVATIONS.

05:31:57 AGAIN, THIS IS THE FRONT ON PALM HERE.




05:32:00 THIS WOULD AGAIN GO THROUGH A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

05:32:04 THROUGH CITY COUNCIL -- I'M SORRY, THROUGH ARC AFTER YOU

05:32:10 APPROVE THIS REZONING.

05:32:11 WE WOULD COME BACK AND GET SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS ON THAT

05:32:17 THROUGH ARC AND THAT'S SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY.

05:32:20 AGAIN, VERNACULAR HOUSE WITH A METAL ROOF, LAP SIDING, ALL

05:32:29 THE THINGS THAT ARE PART OF THE TAMPA HEIGHTS EMBRACES.

05:32:36 QUICKLY, THIS IS THE -- AGAIN THE STUDIO APARTMENT, WITH THE

05:32:44 GARAGE.

05:32:48 SO THE STAFF REPORT AGAIN, WE HAVE REVIEWED IT.

05:32:55 WE WOULD MAKE ALL THE NOTED CORRECTIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND

05:32:58 SECOND READING TO MAKE SOME OF THESE CLEAN-UP ITEMS.

05:33:02 SAME THING WITH NATURAL RESOURCES.

05:33:04 AGAIN, ABOUT TRANSPORTATION AND WHY THEY SAY IT'S

05:33:11 INCONSISTENT, WHICH I AGAIN BELIEVE IS REALLY YOU ONLY NEED

05:33:15 7, NOT 9 PARKING SPACES.

05:33:18 WE HAVE PROVIDED 8.

05:33:19 ALSO, ALL THE CONSIDERATIONS ON THE STAFF REPORT, I THINK WE

05:33:24 MEET ALL OF THOSE CONSIDERATIONS.

05:33:26 WE MEET THE FABRIC IN THE SURROUNDING AREA OF THE TAMPA

05:33:29 HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT.

05:33:30 WE HAVE SIMILAR DENSITY AND ZONING OF THE AREA.

05:33:33 WE HAVE TWO TOWNHOUSE STYLE FEE SIMPLE PROJECTS.

05:33:36 WE WILL PROMOTE THE QUALITY OF IN-FILL HOUSING, IN AN AREA

05:33:41 OF THE CITY WHERE ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS ARE DESPERATELY




05:33:44 NEEDED.

05:33:44 AND UTILIZE UNDERDEVELOPED VACANT LAND.

05:33:50 SO ALL THE WAIVERS THAT WE HAVE ARE TECHNICAL IN NATURE AND

05:33:54 DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS.

05:33:58 SO IN CONCLUSION THE PROJECT IS USING VACANT UNDEVELOPED

05:34:01 LAND, WITH DEVELOP PROJECT IN SCALE, THAT CONFIRMS

05:34:07 CONFORMANCE TO THE GOALS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT LARGE IN THE

05:34:09 TAMPA HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT.

05:34:11 I WOULD ASK IF YOU APPROVE THIS PROJECT TONIGHT.

05:34:13 I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

05:34:15 I HAVE SOME NEIGHBORS HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE

05:34:18 PROJECT.

05:34:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

05:34:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THE MAIN BUILDING AND THE TWO OUTBACK

05:34:37 PARKING UNDERNEATH THE TWO STUDIOS IN THE REAR.

05:34:41 >> I HAVE TWO PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE GARAGE THEN A THIRD

05:34:47 ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE, ENOUGH ROOM TO DO THAT, AND I HAVE

05:34:50 ALSO A RIBBON DRIVE ON PALM AVENUE WITH TWO TANDEM SPACES

05:34:55 HERE FOR A TOTAL OF 8 SPACES.

05:34:58 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.

05:34:59 THE ENTRYWAYS, OFF THE ALLEY ON STUDIO ONE AND STUDIO TWO,

05:35:05 HOW FAR IS THAT FROM THE END OF THE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH TO

05:35:12 THE ALLEYWAY ITSELF?

05:35:14 >> SO WE HAVE A 10-FOOT SETBACK FOR VEHICULAR REQUIRED BY

05:35:19 TRANSPORTATION, THEN THIS STUDIO IS 24 FEET DEEP, SO THE




05:35:24 BEGINNING OF THAT IS ABOUT 30, 32 FEET.

05:35:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WITH A 10-FOOT APRON.

05:35:31 >> 10-FOOT APRON FROM HERE TO THE IMPROVED ALLEY, CORRECT.

05:35:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.

05:35:38 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

05:35:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?

05:35:42 THANK YOU, SIR.

05:35:43 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?

05:35:45 >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR IN ITEM.

05:35:48 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY TO BE SWORN IN TO SPEAK ON THESE

05:36:00 ITEMS?

05:36:01 >> I HAVE FIVE PERSONS HERE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE

05:36:04 TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

05:36:09 THEY HAVE ALL BEEN SWORN IN.

05:36:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: STATE YOUR NAME SIR.

05:36:11 >> MY NAME IS KEVIN LEE.

05:36:13 I LIVE AT 505 EAST PALM AVENUE, AND I OWN 408 EAST PALM

05:36:18 AVENUE, WHICH IS LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY WE ARE

05:36:21 DISCUSSING.

05:36:22 SO I FULLY SUPPORT THIS PROJECT.

05:36:26 I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:36:30 IT ENHANCES DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOTS.

05:36:34 ANY QUESTIONS?

05:36:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.

05:36:36 >> GOOD EVENING.




05:36:46 MY NAME IS MICHAEL KING, 2102 CENTRAL AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY

05:36:50 A BLOCK FROM THIS PROPOSED PROJECT.

05:36:52 I'M JUST HERE TO SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND LET NOW THAT WE ARE

05:36:56 EXCITED ABOUT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:36:57 IT'S PROGRESSING QUICKLY, AND WE ARE EXCITED TO BRING IN

05:37:01 SOME NEW FAMILIES, AND SOME NEW DEVELOPMENT INTO THE

05:37:05 NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:37:06 THANK YOU.

05:37:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.

05:37:07 >> MY NAME IS RENEE KING.

05:37:15 I ALSO RESIDE AT 2102 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE.

05:37:19 I'M EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT AS WELL.

05:37:20 I THINK IT FITS THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND I'M APPROVING OF THIS

05:37:29 PROJECT.

05:37:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.

05:37:30 >> MY NAME IS EDWARD BENDRY. I LIVE APPROXIMATELY A BLOCK

05:37:40 AND A HALF AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT.

05:37:42 I TOO CONCUR WITH WHAT IS TO BE BUILT, AND APPROVE AND HOPE

05:37:50 WE HAVE OTHER PROJECTS LIKE THIS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:37:53 THANK YOU.

05:37:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.

05:37:54 >> MY NAME IS JAMES LEWIS. I LIVE AT 311 EAST AMELIA

05:38:05 AVENUE, TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:38:07 MY WIFE AND I WALK THROUGH THE AREA NEAR THIS PROJECT ALMOST

05:38:11 ON A DAILY BASIS AND WE ARE VERY EXCITED ABOUT WHAT'S




05:38:13 HAPPENING DOWN THERE, WHAT'S PROPOSED, AND WE THINK THIS

05:38:18 PARTICULAR PROJECT WILL BE A VERY GOOD ASSET TO THAT AREA.

05:38:24 WE ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF IT.

05:38:26 THANK YOU.

05:38:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.

05:38:27 >> HI. NAME IS CEDRIC LUTHER, 401 EAST ROSS AVENUE AND I'M

05:38:37 THE APPLICANT, AND JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THERE'S ANY

05:38:40 QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE FOR ME.

05:38:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO QUESTIONS.

05:38:46 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

05:38:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER SPEAKERS?

05:39:00 >> NO.

05:39:01 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ON THE STUDIO, WHAT SIZE STUDIO ARE YOU

05:39:03 BUILDING OVER THE GARAGE?

05:39:04 >> RALPH SCHULER, AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT. WE ARE DOING A

05:39:09 ONE-BEDROOM APARTMENT 620 SQUARE FOOT UNIT ABOVE THE GARAGE.

05:39:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IN ESSENCE YOU HAVE 4 STRUCTURES ON A

05:39:20 LOT, 8900 FEET, IS THAT CORRECT?

05:39:24 >> YES, THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES THERE.

05:39:28 A SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED ON THE FRONT AND THE GARAGES

05:39:31 ARE ATTACHED ALSO.

05:39:33 AND A COMMON PARTY WALL SO THE 2001 STRUCTURES WITH FOUR

05:39:37 UNITS.

05:39:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I HOPE THEY DON'T HAVE ANY VISITORS.

05:39:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO.




05:39:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DO YOU KNOW IF THERE IS STREET PARKING ON

05:39:54 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PALM AVENUE?

05:39:57 >> THERE'S NO STREET PARKING ON PALM AVENUE CURRENTLY.

05:40:02 THERE IS A MEDIAN, I THINK EVENTUALLY PROPOSED, PALM AVENUE,

05:40:06 BUT WE DO HAVE SUFFICIENT STREET PARKING ALONG CENTRAL AND

05:40:10 OF COURSE STREET PARKING CURRENTLY SOUTH AND WEST OF THIS

05:40:14 PROJECT, BUT AS THE CITY DEVELOPS, THE PARKING PROBLEM I

05:40:20 THINK IS EVENTUALLY SOMETHING WE WILL ALL DEAL WITH BUT I

05:40:22 DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE AN ISSUE WITH PARKING ON THIS PROJECT

05:40:25 AT ALL.

05:40:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

05:40:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

05:40:31 MR. CITRO -- MR. DINGFELDER.

05:40:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

05:40:35 DO WE HAVE TRANSPORTATION STAFF ON THE LINE?

05:40:42 >> YES, SIR.

05:40:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HI, JONATHAN.

05:40:47 MR. SCOTT, SO I GUESS THEY ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER ON THAT

05:40:52 ONE SPACE.

05:40:55 TRANSPORTATION FEELS STRONGLY ABOUT THAT.

05:41:03 AS THE PETITIONER HAS SUGGESTED, IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR

05:41:09 NOT NECESSARILY ON PALM BUT AROUND THE CORNER ON CENTRAL OR

05:41:12 SOME OF THE OTHER NEARBY STREETS?

05:41:17 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: THERE IS STREET PARKING, NO-PARKING SIGN,

05:41:21 CLOSE TO STOP SIGNS, BUT I THINK THEY HAVE DONE A PRETTY




05:41:26 GOOD JOB OF MAXIMIZING PARKING ON THE SITE.

05:41:29 IT'S JUST FOUR UNITS, TWO SPACES, BUT I THOUGHT HE DID A

05:41:35 PRETTY GOOD JOB GETTING AS MANY PARKING SPACES AS HE DID ON

05:41:39 THERE.

05:41:40 WE ARE OBJECTING TO THE PARKING WAIVER --

05:41:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST AS A MATTER OF FORMALITY?

05:41:48 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES.

05:41:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT DOESN'T MEET THE CODE SO YOU ARE

05:41:50 OBJECTING, RIGHT?

05:41:52 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES.

05:41:53 IT COULD CAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I GUESS, POTENTIALLY --

05:41:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HAVE YOU HEARD ANYTHING FROM THE

05:41:59 NEIGHBORHOOD IN RESPONSE TO THIS PETITION?

05:42:05 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING.

05:42:06 NO ONE HAS CONTACTED ME ON THIS ONE.

05:42:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, JONATHAN.

05:42:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED TO CLOSE.

05:42:15 MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.

05:42:16 ALL IN FAVOR?

05:42:17 ANY OPPOSED?

05:42:20 ALL RIGHT, ARE YOU OKAY TO TAKE THIS ONE?

05:42:26 >>LUIS VIERA: IT'S MY PLEASURE TO MOVE AN ORDINANCE

05:42:29 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE

05:42:31 REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 411 EAST PALM

05:42:34 AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY




05:42:37 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION

05:42:39 PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PLANT STORAGE AND RETAIL, TO PD,

05:42:42 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,

05:42:44 SEMI-DETACHED, AND RESIDENTIAL STUDIO DWELLINGS, PROVIDING

05:42:47 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

05:42:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT.

05:42:52 ROLL CALL VOTE.

05:42:53 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

05:42:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

05:42:57 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

05:42:58 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.

05:42:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.

05:43:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

05:43:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

05:43:04 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CITRO AND MIRANDA VOTING

05:43:07 NO.

05:43:07 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 4th

05:43:10 AT 9:30 A.M.

05:43:11 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

05:43:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 5.

05:43:17 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

05:43:21 ITEM NUMBER 5 IS REZ 21-74, SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT

05:43:26 2907½ NORTH BOULEVARD AND 2909 NORTH BOULEVARD.

05:43:31 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL

05:43:34 SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR




05:43:38 DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING.

05:43:43 I WILL TURN THE PRESENTATION OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

05:43:47 AND THEN I WILL CONCLUDE MINE.

05:43:50 >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION.

05:43:51 THIS IS AS ANNIE STATED 21-74.

05:43:56 LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, TAMPA

05:44:01 HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AS WELL.

05:44:03 THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

05:44:05 WE HAVE SOME OFFICES ALONG THIS PORTION OF NORTH BOULEVARD,

05:44:10 LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE, AND WE DO HAVE SOME SINGLE-FAMILY

05:44:14 DETACHED.

05:44:17 I WOULD ALSO NOTE -- IS LOCATED WITHIN A HALF MILE --

05:44:23 QUARTER MILE OF THIS SITE,

05:44:31 RESIDENTIAL 10, TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL 20.

05:44:38 SUBURBAN MIXED USE IS THE LIGHT PINK COLOR.

05:44:45 THE SUBJECT SITE IS -- EAST SWANN AVENUE.

05:44:51 THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE

05:44:53 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

05:44:54 THE RESIDENTIAL 10, AND TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS IS

05:45:04 EXACTLY WHAT THE LAND USE CATEGORY IS CALLING FOR.

05:45:07 THIS WILL ALLOW 9.06 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH

05:45:12 THE DENSITY ON THIS RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE

05:45:16 DESIGNATION.

05:45:17 AS ALWAYS, THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW

05:45:20 HOUSING ON VACANT OR UNDERUTILIZED LAND, TAMPA'S GROWING




05:45:28 POPULATION, AND IT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY.

05:45:30 I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND I WILL TURN IT BARK

05:45:33 OVER TO ANNIE.

05:45:34 THANK YOU.

05:45:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES:

05:45:50 >>JENNIFER MALONE: THE LENGTH OR THE WIDTH?

05:45:52 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

05:45:55 I AM GOING TO GO OVER THE CONFORM LOT MASS THAT WE DID, IN

05:46:03 MY PRESENTATION.

05:46:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. MALONE?

05:46:07 ALL RIGHT.

05:46:07 >>ANNIE BARNES: IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN.

05:46:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, WE GOT IT.

05:46:25 >>ANNIE BARNES: CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN NOW?

05:46:28 GREAT.

05:46:28 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 2907½ BOULEVARD AND

05:46:32 2909 NORTH BOULEVARD FROM RS-50 TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY

05:46:38 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF

05:46:42 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING.

05:46:45 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS, THE FIRST WAIVER

05:46:50 REQUESTED IS TO ALLOW REDUCTION IN AISLE WIDTH FROM 24 FEET

05:46:54 TO 13 FEET AND THE SECOND TO ALLOW REDUCTION IN THE LOCATION

05:47:00 OF THE STRUCTURAL VEHICULAR ENTRANCE OF A TWO CAR GARAGE SET

05:47:05 BACK FROM 10 FEET TO 3 FEET.

05:47:09 THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF LOT 18 AND 19 LOT C OF WC BLOCK




05:47:16 SECOND ADDITION CORRECTED MAP SUBDIVISION IN 1918 SHOWN HERE

05:47:19 IN RED.

05:47:21 HERE IS A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY, APPROXIMATELY 9600 SQUARE

05:47:26 FEET IN SIZE, OR 0.22 ACRES.

05:47:31 SO HERE AS MENTIONED EARLIER, THERE WAS AN ANALYSIS OF 441

05:47:42 TOTAL LOTS.

05:47:43 STAFF IDENTIFIED THAT 15% OF THE LOTS IN THE STUDY AREA, 67%

05:47:47 OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK, 73% OF THE BLOCK NORTH BOULEVARD, AND

05:47:52 66% OF THE BLOCK FACE ARE LOT WIDTHS OF 49.99 FEET OR LESS.

05:47:59 STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED LOT MEASURING 40 FEET ADD WIDTH AS

05:48:04 PLATTED, CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.

05:48:08 HERE IS SITE PLAN PROVIDED SHOWING VEHICULAR ACCESS PROVIDED

05:48:12 FROM THE ALLEY ON THE NORTH SIDE.

05:48:17 AND EITHER THE ELEVATIONS -- THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE

05:48:21 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS AND

05:48:23 ACCESSORY GARAGES.

05:48:27 AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THIS IS AN AERIAL MAP, SURROUNDING

05:48:30 ZONING, A MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES IN THE

05:48:33 IMMEDIATE AREA.

05:48:34 PROPERTY IS LOCATED ACROSS NORTH BOULEVARD IS ZONED

05:48:38 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPED OFFICE USE.

05:48:42 PROPERTY SOUTH OF THE SITE IS ZONED RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AS

05:48:45 WELL, SINGLE-FAMILY USE.

05:48:48 PROPERTY DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE IS ZONED PD AND BUSINESS

05:48:54 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND EAST OF THE SITE RS-50 AND DEVELOPED




05:48:58 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

05:49:01 HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS IT IS NOW.

05:49:06 AND THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY WILL GO SOUTH ON NORTH

05:49:09 BOULEVARD AVENUE.

05:49:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: CAN YOU GO TO THAT LAST PHOTO?

05:49:14 >> YES.

05:49:15 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT IN THE FENCED AREA.

05:49:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: AND THE ONE BEFORE THAT.

05:49:19 >>ANNIE BARNES: THIS --

05:49:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S THE LOT THERE, RIGHT?

05:49:26 >>ANNIE BARNES: THAT IS CORRECT.

05:49:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.

05:49:28 >>ANNIE BARNES: NO PROBLEM.

05:49:32 SHOWN HERE IS PROPERTY LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE

05:49:35 SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD.

05:49:39 AND THIS IS FACING THE OTHER WAY, NORTHWARD, NORTHWEST ON

05:49:45 NORTH BOULEVARD AS WELL.

05:49:48 SHOWN HERE AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT PARCEL WITH THE

05:49:51 ADJACENT HOME NEXT TO IT.

05:49:59 AND HERE ARE SOME OF THE OFFICES THAT WERE DESCRIBED

05:50:02 EARLIER, AND THE SITE LOCATED ON THE RIGHT.

05:50:08 THIS IS THE ALLEY CURRENTLY AS IT RUNS BEHIND FACING

05:50:12 NORTHWARD, NORTHWARD.

05:50:15 AND THEN AGAIN, HERE IS OFFICE ACROSS THE STREET.

05:50:20 IT IS TWO-STORY IN SIZE BUT SET BACK QUITE A BIT.




05:50:26 AGAIN, THIS IS THE ALLEY FACING SOUTH.

05:50:30 SO FROM BOTH SIDES.

05:50:32 YOU CAN SEE THE ALLEY.

05:50:35 IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICY 9.38, THE PROPOSED LOT MEASURING

05:50:39 40 FEET are consistent with the existing development

05:50:43 pattern.

05:50:46 The requested waivers result in safety concern that could

05:50:49 create an adverse impact on the immediate neighborhood.

05:50:52 The massing and the height of the proposed two-story

05:50:55 structures are measuring 40 feet in width is too large

05:50:59 especially in a neighborhood comprised of smaller one-story

05:51:02 structures.

05:51:03 Therefore, development review staff has reviewed the

05:51:06 application and find the overall request inconsistent.

05:51:10 That concludes my report.

05:51:12 I'm available for any questions you might have.

05:51:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: Any questions of staff?

05:51:23 And that first building, that area, that lot --

05:51:31 >>ANNIE BARNES: Can you see it now?

05:51:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: Yes.

05:51:34 Proposed a two, two-story dwelling on this property, is that

05:51:39 correct?

05:51:40 >>ANNIE BARNES: That is correct.

05:51:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The lot is a total of 80 feet wide?

05:51:45 >>ANNIE BARNES: That is correct.




05:51:47 AS ORIGINALLY PLATTED.

05:51:49 IF I GO BACK TO MY ORIGINAL PRESENTATION I CAN SHOW YOU THE

05:51:52 ORIGINAL PLATTED LOT.

05:51:54 SO HERE IS A SURVEY SHOWING HERE, AND THEN THESE ARE THE

05:51:59 HISTORICALLY PLATTED LOTS.

05:52:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN?

05:52:10 ALL RIGHT.

05:52:10 LET'S HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.

05:52:11 >> GOOD EVENING.

05:52:17 I'M JOHN LAROCCA, REPRESENTING THE OWNER, APPLICANT, JOHN

05:52:23 AND ALEXANDRIA DIAZ, OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY.

05:52:27 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

05:52:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.

05:52:32 >>JOHN LAROCCA: ALL THE DETAILS WITH THIS CASE HAVE BEEN

05:52:33 THOROUGHLY DESCRIBED.

05:52:35 BY THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION PRESENTATION AND THE

05:52:38 PLANNING COMMISSION.

05:52:39 I AM NOT GOING TO REPEAT EVERYTHING THAT'S IN THE REPORT.

05:52:42 THE STAFF ALWAYS DOES A VERY THOROUGH JOB.

05:52:46 AGAIN I WILL NOT REITERATE ALL OF THEM.

05:52:48 I DO WANT TO ADDRESS AND RESPOND TO THE MATTERS OF THE

05:52:51 INCONSISTENCY DESCRIBED IN THE REPORT.

05:52:54 REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF FINDINGS OF

05:52:57 CONCERN RELATED TO THE WIDTH OF THE ALLEY ACCESS, THIS IS AN

05:53:01 EXISTING ALLEY IN A PLAT THAT WAS CREATED IN 1918.




05:53:07 THERE ARE SOME HOMES OBVIOUSLY THAT ACCESS OR ARE LOCATED ON

05:53:12 THE ALLEY FROM HISTORICAL PURPOSES IN REFERENCE AND

05:53:17 DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT IS AN EXISTING SITUATION.

05:53:20 WE ARE TRYING TO DESIGN AND INTRODUCE REDEVELOPMENT TO THE

05:53:23 AREA AS IT'S OCCURRING THROUGHOUT THE AREA IN THE BROADER

05:53:26 NEIGHBORHOOD, AS YOU ARE QUITE FAMILIAR WITH.

05:53:29 IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, WE ARE TRYING TO ACCOMMODATE AND

05:53:34 BEST DESIGN A PRODUCT THAT IS VERY MARKETABLE IN THAT PART

05:53:41 OF THE CITY AS OUR ENVIRONS IN THE URBAN AREA ARE BEING

05:53:48 REEXAMINED AND REDISCOVERED.

05:53:52 THERE IS A LOT OF OTHER EXAMPLES OF THIS IN THE COMMUNITY,

05:53:56 AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO DO, WE UNDERSTAND THOSE

05:53:59 DIMENSIONAL LIMITATIONS IN THE ALLEY WHERE THE LOTS AND

05:54:03 PARKING GARAGES ARE PROPOSED.

05:54:05 THE LOTS DO FRONT ON NORTH BOULEVARD, WHICH IS A FUNCTIONAL

05:54:09 ARTERIAL STREET.

05:54:11 ALLEYS WHEN AVAILABLE ARE USUALLY IN AN APPROPRIATE AND

05:54:15 ACCEPTABLE MEANS AND ALTERNATIVE ACCESS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES

05:54:19 UP FRONT ON ARTERIAL ROADS AND MOST PEOPLE WOULD PREFER TO

05:54:23 HAVE ALLEY ACCESS TO MAKE IT WORK.

05:54:25 THE APPLICANT SEEKS THIS WAIVER FROM THE STANDARD

05:54:27 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING

05:54:30 CONDITIONS PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING AS HAS BEEN

05:54:34 DISCUSSED WITH STAFF.

05:54:37 ACCEPTABLE MEANS AND METHODS TO MINIMIZE LIMITATIONS TO




05:54:40 VEHICULAR IMPROVEMENT MOVEMENT AND VISIBILITY TO INCLUDE BUT

05:54:43 NOT BE LIMITED TO THE INSTALLATION OF SAFETY STUDY AND

05:54:50 POSSIBLY ESTABLISH A ONE-WAY FLOW BECAUSE WE BELIEVE

05:54:53 OBVIOUSLY THIS IS NEW DEVELOPMENT, BUT AS THE AREA

05:54:56 REDEVELOPS, THERE MAY BE OTHER CONTINUED NEED FOR USE OF

05:55:02 THAT ALLEY, AND POTENTIALLY ESTABLISHING A ONE-WAY FLOW, IF

05:55:07 THAT MAKES SENSE, IS SOMETHING THAT THE APPLICANT IS WILLING

05:55:09 TO EXPLORE WITH THE CITY AS AN OPTION.

05:55:13 AND POSSIBLY ADJUST THE GARAGE BUILDING PLACEMENT IN FINAL

05:55:18 DESIGN TO BEST ACCOMMODATE SAFETY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

05:55:21 CITY'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

05:55:26 THEREFORE, WE BELIEVE SOME TYPE OF WAIVER TO RECOGNIZE WHAT

05:55:31 WOULD BE APPROPRIATE ACCESSORY GARAGE PARKING IN WHAT WILL

05:55:37 BE A MODERNLY PLACED AN CONSTRUCTED STRUCTURE IS

05:55:42 APPROPRIATE, AND WAIVERS ARE JUSTIFIABLE IN THAT REGARD

05:55:49 AGAIN WITH THE SUMS THAT WE CAN WORK OUT SOME SOLUTIONS THAT

05:55:52 ARE SATISFACTORY AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.

05:55:54 THE OTHER INCONSISTENCY REGARDING MASSING AND HEIGHT WITH

05:55:57 REGARD TO DON INSTRUCTION ON THESE TWO LOTS, IN YOUR PACKET,

05:56:03 AND I KNOW THERE ARE SITE PLANS THAT WERE ILLUSTRATED ON THE

05:56:07 SCREEN EARLIER, THESE ARE TWO EXISTING PLATTED LOTS OF

05:56:11 RECORD THAT ARE 40 FEET WIDE.

05:56:13 THE TWO STRUCTURES THAT ARE PROPOSED ON THE LOT ARE 26 FEET

05:56:18 WIDE AND HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED ELSEWHERE SUCCESSFULLY AND

05:56:24 MARKETABLE.




05:56:27 THE USES AND INTENSITY OF USE, THE DENSITY OF USE WOULD BE

05:56:30 CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

05:56:34 MANY OF THE LOTS IN THE STUDY AREA SURROUNDING THAT AREA

05:56:38 DEVELOPED AND CREATED AT LESS THAN 49.99 FEET.

05:56:42 OF THE WOULD NOT BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT

05:56:46 PATTERN, AND I HAVE ON THE OVERHEAD THE BUFFER MAP THAT WE

05:56:51 UTILIZE THAT BEST DEPICTS THE PROPERTY'S LOCATION AND THE

05:56:55 PROPERTY OWNER THAT WERE NOTIFIED WITH THIS REZONING WITHIN

05:56:58 THE 250 FEET.

05:57:01 I WILL NOTE THAT WHILE I DO BRING EXAMPLES OR PICTURES OF

05:57:05 THAT, THE PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOULEVARD IN THE

05:57:08 BLOCK SOUTH OF WEST PLAZA AT THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP IS BEING

05:57:14 DEVELOPED WITH ATTACHED TOWNHOUSES.

05:57:16 ATTACHED AND MORE DENSE IN TERMS OF CHARACTER AND INTERFACE

05:57:19 WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEIR FRONTAGE IS AN AREA ON THE

05:57:23 STREET, AND AGAIN ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT

05:57:25 THAT'S OCCURRING IN THE AREA.

05:57:27 WITH THAT SAID, MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED

05:57:30 ON AN ARTERIAL ROAD WITH A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE

05:57:34 USES LOCATED ON THE EDGE OF THE PLATTED NEIGHBORHOOD AS YOU

05:57:37 MOVE FARTHER EAST AND FARTHER WEST OF BOULEVARD.

05:57:42 THE BROADER COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING THIS

05:57:45 PROPERTY ARE ALL EXPERIENCING INFILL AND REDEVELOPMENT WITH

05:57:49 A MIX OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS IN BOTH ONE AND TWO-STORY

05:57:53 STRUCTURES, SOME THAT ARE IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT




05:57:55 STAGE NOW, OTHERS THAT ARE JUST BEING CONSTRUCTED, OTHERS

05:57:58 THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT.

05:57:59 THE FACT THAT THESE TWO LOTS ON BOULEVARD, AND WE ARE

05:58:02 ATTEMPTING TO PROVIDE THROUGH THIS PROCESS IN THE WAY THAT

05:58:05 WE SEE ACCESS THROUGH THE ALLEY, WE BELIEVE WOULD ALLOW ONCE

05:58:11 DEVELOPED AS INDICATED IN THESE PLANS SOMETHING THAT WOULD

05:58:13 BE IN FACT COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

05:58:16 THE REZONING AS PRESENTED TO THE PD SITE PLAN SUPPORTS MANY

05:58:20 OF THE POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS DETAILED IN

05:58:22 THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ANALYSIS AND REPORT WHICH YOU HAVE

05:58:25 WITH YOU.

05:58:26 AS YOU KNOW, REZONINGS ARE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS,

05:58:29 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

05:58:33 IT'S MY OPINION THAT THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE

05:58:35 CHARACTER OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE AREA BECAUSE OF THE

05:58:37 TWO-STORY HEIGHT AND MASSING BEING CONSISTENT, MEETING

05:58:42 ACCEPTABLE STRUCTURAL SETBACKS.

05:58:44 THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE WITH THE

05:58:47 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN LONG NORTH BOULEVARD AND IS CONSISTENT

05:58:49 WITH THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ENCOURAGED UNDER THE

05:58:52 RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.

05:58:54 THAT BEING IN THE CASE OF NORTH BOULEVARD, A MIXTURE OF USES

05:58:59 THAT WOULD NOT BE IN COMPATIBLE WITH TWO-STORY STRUCTURES.

05:59:02 THE APPLICANT OWNER AGREES WITH THE REVISIONS REQUESTED AS

05:59:06 OUTLINED IN REVISION SHEET NUMBER 6, PAGE NUMBER 6 OF THE




05:59:11 STAFF REPORT AND INTENDS TO MAKE SUCH SITE PLAN REVISIONS

05:59:14 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

05:59:16 WITH THAT I CONCLUDE MY COMMENTS AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST

05:59:19 YOUR SUPPORT AND APPROVAL F.NECESSARY, WITH ANY PARTICULAR

05:59:22 DETAIL, JOHN DIAZ, THE OWNER APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING

05:59:26 AND CAN ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO WHAT IS

05:59:29 BEING PROPOSED WITH DESIGN AND STRUCTURE AND THE MARKET THAT

05:59:34 HE IS SEEKING TO MARKET THESE PROPERTIES TO.

05:59:39 THANK YOU.

05:59:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS?

05:59:42 MR. DINGFELDER.

05:59:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, MR. LAROCCA.

05:59:46 JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS.

05:59:49 NUMBER ONE, COULDN'T HELP BUT NOTICE THE BIG TREE IN THE

05:59:55 MIDDLE BEHIND THE FENCE, LOOKS LIKE IT'S BEING SUBJECT TO

06:00:00 REMOVAL AS PART OF THE PD REQUEST.

06:00:05 >>JOHN LAROCCA: RIGHT.

06:00:05 CORRECT.

06:00:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I COULD ASK STAFF OR I COULD ASK YOU, IF

06:00:09 YOU WISH, FOR THE STATUS OF THAT TREE AND WHAT CONDITION

06:00:12 IT'S IN.

06:00:12 IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S JUST -- I MEAN, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S ONE

06:00:18 LARGER ONE.

06:00:20 >>JOHN LAROCCA: I DON'T -- FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE WHAT HAS

06:00:23 BEEN REVIEWED, THERE'S NOTHING -- IT'S NOT GRAND TREES, AND




06:00:29 THERE ARE MITIGATION BASED ON THE TREES THAT NEED TO BE

06:00:32 REMOVED.

06:00:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME ASK STAFF, IF WE HAVE ANY STAFF

06:00:36 SPEAKING TO THE TREES.

06:00:37 >> YES.

06:00:39 ANN MERE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR IN ANY CASE, NATURAL

06:00:42 RESOURCES.

06:00:43 GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.

06:00:46 YES, THAT IS A 21-INCH LAUREL OAK, AND IT DOES HAVE FUNGS ON

06:00:53 THE ROOT FLARE SO WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF REMOVAL OF THAT TREE.

06:00:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DOES IT HAVE -- I'M SORRY.

06:01:01 DOES IT HAVE A GRADE OR A CONDITION OR NUMBER?

06:01:06 >> ERIN MAEHR: YES, IT'S E-9 SO A HAZARDOUS TREE.

06:01:16 >>JOHN LAROCCA: AND IF I MAY, MR. DINGFELDER, I DIDN'T

06:01:18 CONCENTRATE ON HAVING THE TREE DETAILS AND THANK YOU, ERIN

06:01:21 FOR ANSWERING THOSE QUESTIONS BUT TREES WERE NEVER AN ISSUE

06:01:24 OTHER THAN COMPLIANCE WITH THAN THE CODE AS WE MOVE FORWARD.

06:01:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY.

06:01:28 THEN THE OTHER QUESTION IS MORE PROSTHETIC.

06:01:45 IS THERE A SIDEWALK ALONG BOULEVARD ALREADY?

06:01:50 >>JOHN LAROCCA: THERE IS A SIDEWALK ON BOULEVARD, YES.

06:01:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I CAN'T TELL WHICH ONE, BUT WHEN I LOOK

06:01:54 AT THE ELEVATION SHEET ON PAGE 2 -- [~AUDIO CUTS OUT~]

06:02:06 I KNOW YOU AND COUNCIL ALWAYS WANT TO ENCOURAGE FRONT

06:02:10 PORCHES FOR NUMEROUS REASONS THAT I DON'T NEED TO GET INTO




06:02:14 TONIGHT, BUT IT APPEARS THE OTHER ONE IS ANOTHER SMALL

06:02:18 LITTLE, YOU KNOW, JUST A DOOR OPENING AND A COVER BUT REALLY

06:02:22 NOT A PORCH YOU CAN SIT ON AND ENJOY CONVERSING WITH YOUR

06:02:28 NEIGHBORS, ET CETERA.

06:02:31 SO ALTHOUGH I APPRECIATE THE FACT YOU WANT A LITTLE

06:02:34 DIVERSITY FROM ONE HOUSE TO THE NEXT INSTEAD OF COOKIE

06:02:38 CUTTER BEING THE SAME, I JUST WAS CURIOUS AS TO WHY THE

06:02:42 DEVELOPER WOULD CHOOSE NOT TO HAVE A GOOD SIZE FRONT PORCH

06:02:46 THERE.

06:02:51 >>JOHN LAROCCA: IF YOU DON'T MIND, LET ME ASK JOHN DIAZ, THE

06:02:55 OWNER APPLICANT, WHO HAPPENS TO BE A BUILDER ADDRESS THAT

06:02:57 AND I BELIEVE HE'S WILLING TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

06:03:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU GUYS HAVE BOTH BEEN SWORN?

06:03:04 >> YES, I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

06:03:07 JOHN DIAZ.

06:03:10 GOOD EVENING.

06:03:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU HEARD THE QUESTION, MR. DIAZ?

06:03:13 >> I DID.

06:03:14 I DID. SO WE WERE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING WHERE WE ARE

06:03:19 RECOGNIZING THE PAST AND THE PRESENT, RIGHT?

06:03:24 OR THE FUTURE.

06:03:24 SO WE DID, TO YOUR POINT, WANT TO AVOID BRINGING IN TWO

06:03:29 COOKIE CUTTER HOMES.

06:03:30 SO WE HAD ONE THAT'S A LITTLE MORE MODERN, ONE THAT'S A

06:03:34 LITTLE MORE CLASSIC.




06:03:35 AS FAR AS THE FRONT PORCH COMMUNITY, WE UNDERSTAND THE

06:03:37 IMPORTANCE IN TAMPA HEIGHTS OF HAVING THE FRONT PORCH.

06:03:42 WE ACTUALLY HAVE SIDE PORCHES, AND WE ARE CONSIDERING

06:03:45 WHETHER WE HAVE THE GATES HELD BACK FROM THE SIDE, IF YOU

06:03:51 LOOK, YOU WILL SEE THAT BOTH HOUSES WILL HAVE LIKE A SIDE

06:03:55 PORCH.

06:03:55 SO WE ARE KIND OF THINKING PERHAPS MORE LIKE IN THE SHADE,

06:03:59 FACING THE WEST SIDE, AND FACING THE SUNSET, AND SO WE JUST

06:04:05 DIDN'T WANT -- DIDN'T THINK PEOPLE WOULD BE SITTING THERE IN

06:04:08 THE SUN.

06:04:09 SO WE HAVE THOSE SIDE PORCHES FOR THEM TO ENJOY.

06:04:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THAT'S YOUR NORTH ELEVATION ON ONE,

06:04:20 AND --

06:04:25 >> CORRECT.

06:04:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

06:04:30 WE DON'T HAVE A REQUIREMENT FOR FRONT PORCHES.

06:04:32 IT SEEMS LIKE ESSENTIALLY WITH THE WAY THE CODE IS WRITTEN,

06:04:37 YOU KNOW, THERE'S OPPORTUNITY TO EVEN ACTUALLY INTRUDE IN

06:04:40 THE FRONT YARD SETBACK WITH FRONT PORCHES.

06:04:44 I JUST HOPE YOU ARE AWARE OF THAT, AND MAYBE NEXT TIME.

06:04:48 >> WE'LL CERTAINLY TAKE IT INTO CONSIDERATION.

06:04:51 THANK YOU.

06:04:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU.

06:04:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?

06:04:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY.




06:04:59 [OFF MICROPHONE] THE GARAGE, THE ALLEYWAY.

06:05:09 AND THE ALLEYWAY, HOW MANY FEET IS THAT, 18 FOOT?

06:05:13 >> THE ALLEY IS 10 FEET.

06:05:16 >>JOSEPH CITRO: 10 FEET.

06:05:18 SO INCLUDING THE APRON AND THE ALLEY, YOU ARE 13 FEET THERE.

06:05:24 MY CONCERN IS, THE EDGES FOR THE TWO-CAR GARAGE IN AND OUT

06:05:32 OF THAT ALLEY, THAT IS A MAJOR CONCERN OF MINE.

06:05:36 SO I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT RIGHT UP FRONT.

06:05:40 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

06:05:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE?

06:05:44 MR. DINGFELDER, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED, SIR.

06:05:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CITRO, A GOOD QUESTION AND I AM GLAD

06:05:51 YOU BROUGHT IT UP ABOUT THE ALLEY BECAUSE STAFF, THEY ARE

06:05:54 ASKING FOR A WAIVER FROM OUR CODE REQUIREMENT IN REGARD TO

06:05:58 THE 3 FEET, IS SUPPOSED TO BE, WHAT, 10 FEET JOHN AND SAYS

06:06:03 BACK DOWN TO 3 FEET.

06:06:04 SO MY QUESTION IS, HOW LONG AN ALLEY IS THAT, AND HOW MANY

06:06:09 HOMES -- HOW MANY HOMES ARGUABLY WOULD BE UTILIZING IT, YOU

06:06:16 KNOW, BEFORE THEY GET OUT TO A STREET?

06:06:20 BECAUSE I THINK THERE'S SOME ALLEYS THAT ARE 20 HOUSES LONG

06:06:27 AND MAYBE USED BY BOTH SIDES AND YOU HAVE A LOT OF ALLEY AND

06:06:32 THAT SORT OF THING, BUT IN THIS PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD IT

06:06:35 SEEMS LIKE THEY HAVE A LIMITED NUMBER OF POSSIBLE HOMES THAT

06:06:37 WOULD BE UTILIZING THAT ALLEY.

06:06:41 >>JOHN LAROCCA: BASED ON THE PROPERTY MAP, YOU CAN SEE THAT




06:06:45 THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY THREE, SIX --

06:06:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CAN WE SWITCH TO THE OVERHEAD, PLEASE?

06:06:54 >>JOHN LAROCCA: YES.

06:06:54 THERE ARE 8 HOMES ON THE EAST SIDE NOT ALL USING THE NUMBER

06:06:57 OF ALLEYS AND THE PROPOSED FENCES.

06:06:59 THE WEST SIDE HAS A MIXTURE OF USES, AND NOT EVERYONE, I

06:07:03 DON'T THINK, THERE IS ANY ALLEY USE BACKING UP TO THAT ALLEY

06:07:08 RIGHT NOW.

06:07:09 JOHN, ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY?

06:07:10 >> JUST THE VERY CORNER LOT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER MUCH

06:07:14 PLAZA AND BOULEVARD.

06:07:15 I GUESS OUR PERSPECTIVE AT THIS POINT IS, OBVIOUSLY JOHN

06:07:19 DIAZ IS A DEVELOPER OF THIS TYPE OF HOME AND HE IS INVOLVED

06:07:25 WITH OTHERS THAT ARE OF THIS CHARACTER WHERE OLDER AREAS

06:07:31 HAVE NARROW ALLEYS AND IT IS A CONCERN OF OURS.

06:07:35 I MEAN, WE ARE WILLING TO SET BACK ANOTHER 10 FEET, GIVING

06:07:38 THE PROPERTY OWNER A BACKYARD, RATHER THAN CREATING ALL

06:07:42 DRIVEWAY SPACE TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.

06:07:44 YOU KNOW, WHETHER IT'S 10 FEET OR WE ADD ANOTHER 5 FEET AND

06:07:48 COME UP WITH A SOLUTION.

06:07:50 I AM NOT A TRAFFIC ENGINEER, I WILL STATE THAT FOR THE

06:07:52 RECORD.

06:07:52 BUT I DO UNDERSTAND THAT WHILE THERE ARE STANDARD CODE

06:07:56 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE WAIVER THAT WE ARE SEEKING ARE BECAUSE

06:07:59 OF INCONSISTENCY WITH OUR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THOSE




06:08:04 STANDARDS, WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO FIND SOME SOLUTIONS AS WE

06:08:09 DEVELOP THE SITE WITH REGARD TO OTHER ALTERNATIVES TO

06:08:13 PROTECT SAFETY AND VISIBILITY FOR CARS GETTING IN AND OUT.

06:08:17 I THINK IT'S SAVE TO UNDERSTAND PLAYING THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATE

06:08:22 AS SOMEONE WHO WOULD BUY A HOME, AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE

06:08:25 STANDARD HOMES, I CAN SEE THE MARKET IS INTERESTED IN

06:08:32 BRINGING IN FAMILIES, 3 BEDROOM, 2 BATH HOMES, IN A MORE

06:08:36 URBAN ENVIRONMENT, AND THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO GET IN AND

06:08:39 OUT OF THEIR PROPERTY.

06:08:40 ANYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT.

06:08:41 SO WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING THAT'S SAFE AND ADD QUALITY

06:08:44 BUT AT THE SAME TIME OFFER SOME GREEN SPACE IN THE REAR

06:08:46 YARD, BASED ON WHERE THESE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED.

06:08:49 AND WE ARE WILLING TO DO, AND JOHN AGREES TO THIS, WE ARE

06:08:56 WILLING TO LOOK AT ALTERNATIVES, AND I CAN WRITE THAT INTO

06:09:00 ANY PROVISIONS TO THE CONDITIONS TO INDICATE THAT WE WOULD

06:09:04 LOOK AT OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDING GREATER SETBACK TO ACHIEVE

06:09:09 THE BEST POSSIBLE SOLUTION IF THAT WERE TO BE MIXED WITH THE

06:09:12 BACKUP, AS FACTORS THAT WOULD GO INTO DESIGNING THIS TO MEET

06:09:17 AT LEAST A MUCH SAFER AND ACCESSIBLE ENVIRONMENT.

06:09:23 AND THAT'S THE EASIEST WAY I CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION RIGHT

06:09:26 NOW.

06:09:26 WE ARE OPEN TO DOING SOME THINGS RATHER THAN IMMEDIATELY

06:09:29 JUST GIVING UP ALL THE BACKYARD AND PUSH EVERYTHING BACK AND

06:09:32 HAVE ALL PAVEMENT AND DRIVEWAY, UNDERSTANDING THAT THAT'S




06:09:35 IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE TO GET IN AND OUT OF THE GARAGE.

06:09:38 BUT WE WERE LED TO BELIEVE EARLY ON -- AND I AM NOT SPEAKING

06:09:42 FOR JONATHAN, I KNOW YOU ARE ON THIS MEETING, IF YOU WILL

06:09:48 ONLINE, BUT MAYBE YOU CAN ADDRESS THAT.

06:09:50 WE ARE LOOKING AT OTHER WAYS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.

06:09:53 I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO STATE THAT IN THE RECORD SO THAT

06:09:56 WE CAN WORK WITH STAFF AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.

06:09:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. LAROCCA, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

06:10:03 AS I SEE THIS, THIS PROPERTY IS FACING TO THE WEST.

06:10:10 >>JOHN LAROCCA: THAT'S CORRECT.

06:10:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND THERE ARE PROBLEMS ON NORTH

06:10:13 BOULEVARD, A HIGHLY TRAVELED ROAD, AND SPEEDS SOMETIMES A

06:10:16 LITTLE HIGHER THAN WE WOULD LIKE, AND IT'S A ROAD THAT'S

06:10:22 USED FOR MANY PURPOSES, ALL THE WAY TO OSBORNE AVENUE, TURNS

06:10:26 AROUND, GOES BACK TO FLORIDA OR ANYWHERE YOU WANT.

06:10:30 SO I UNDERSTAND WHY YOU CAN'T HAVE AND APPRECIATE YOU CAN'T

06:10:33 HAVE NOTHING IN FRONT, HAVE THE PARKING IN THE BACK BECAUSE

06:10:37 IT WOULD BE REALLY CHAOTIC.

06:10:39 SO THE ALLEYWAY, YOU SAID YOUR PROPERTY, THE FIRST UNIT

06:10:43 WOULD BE, I THINK, THREE PROPERTIES DOWN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE

06:10:47 40-FOOT LOT, JUST TAKING A GUESS, AND TO YOUR SOUTH, YOU

06:10:50 HAVE THE LARGER PART OF THE ALLEY.

06:10:53 AM YOU I CORRECT?

06:10:56 >>JOHN LAROCCA: CORRECT.

06:10:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE SOME THINGS




06:10:59 YOU CAN DO.

06:11:00 I AM NOT SUGGESTING IT.

06:11:01 BUT EVEN IN THIS GARAGE WHEN YOU LEAVE OUR CITY PARKING,

06:11:09 29.95 MIRROR THERE FROM KMART AND IT LOOKED REAL WELL.

06:11:14 YOU CAN SEE WHAT'S COMING ON THE LEFT SIDE, BUT YOU HAVE A

06:11:17 BLIND SPOT WHEN YOU COME OUT, YOU DON'T KNOW IF SOMEBODY IS

06:11:20 A BABY WITH A STROLLER OR SOMEBODY ON ONE OF THE MOPEDS AND

06:11:25 IT CREATES A LOT OF PROBLEMS.

06:11:27 SO I WOULD SUGGEST SOMETHING THAT YOU COULD SEE BOTH SIDES

06:11:30 OF THE ALLEY IN THE BACK, COULD BE SOME OF YOUR SOLUTION.

06:11:33 I APPRECIATE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, IF THIS GOES

06:11:37 FORWARD, THAT YOU MAKE THOSE CONCESSIONS, MAKE SOME --

06:11:42 >>JOHN LAROCCA: AND I WILL STATE FOR THE RECORD, MR.

06:11:44 MIRANDA, IN REGARD TO YOUR COMMENTS, THAT THERE IS

06:11:47 REFERENCE, IN PART OF THE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND

06:11:52 READING, WE NEED TO MOVE THAT LANGUAGE AROUND.

06:11:54 BUT RIGHT NOW WE HAVE IN THE PLAN A STATEMENT THAT SAYS AT

06:11:57 THE TIME OF PERMITTING THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT EVIDENCE

06:12:00 TO A SURE BACKUP VISIBILITY TO ACCEPTABLE MEANS AND METHODS

06:12:03 SUCH AS SAFETY AS ONE EXAMPLE.

06:12:06 I WEPT FURTHER AND I AM WILLING TO GO FURTHER TO SAY WE WANT

06:12:09 TO LOOK AT ANY AND ALL METHODS TO DO THAT.

06:12:12 WE ARE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS THAT THE ALLEY CONTINUES TO BE

06:12:15 UTILIZED WHETHER THIS BECOMES THE FIRST ONE WITH REGULAR

06:12:17 USE, CAUSING REGULAR USE OF THIS SITUATION, AND OTHERS THAT




06:12:22 ARE BEING DEVELOPED IN THE AREA MAY BE OPEN UP.

06:12:25 I UNDERSTAND SOME UNDER CURRENT STANDARD INDIVIDUAL LOT ON

06:12:29 THE STREET BEHIND US ON WOODROW, I BELIEVE ASSOCIATION NEW

06:12:33 CONSTRUCTION THAT'S GOING THROUGH THE NORMAL PERMITTING

06:12:35 PROCESS, AND THEY MAY WANT TO HAVE ACCESS. I DON'T KNOW

06:12:39 WHAT THEY DESIGNED BUT THEY ARE NOT OWN AN ARTERIAL.

06:12:41 WE RECOGNIZE THE ALLEY WILL HAVE TO BE IMPROVED AND PUTTING

06:12:44 MIRRORS AND COMING UP WITH A VARIETY OF SOLUTIONS.

06:12:46 WE ARE WILLING TO DO THAT AND PARTICIPANT, AND I WILL WITH

06:12:49 THE STAFF'S ADVICE AND COORDINATION, I WILL MAKE SURE I ADD

06:12:52 THAT TO ANYTHING ON THE NOTATIONS AND EDITS BETWEEN FIRST

06:12:56 AND SECOND READING.

06:12:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND SOME OF THOSE HOUSES THAT ARE THERE

06:13:00 NOW ARE PUSHED BACK, AND THERE MAY BE INGRESS AND EGRESS ON

06:13:04 NORTH BOULEVARD.

06:13:05 I'M NOT SURE.

06:13:08 >>JOHN LAROCCA: CORRECT.

06:13:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DO WE HAVE SOMEONE FROM TRANSPORTATION?

06:13:15 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:13:19 I BELIEVE JONATHAN SCOTT IS ON THE LINE AS WELL.

06:13:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. SCOTT.

06:13:25 CAN YOU GIVE ME THE REASON WHY TRANSPORTATION FOUND THIS

06:13:28 INCONSISTENT?

06:13:35 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: FROM THE GARAGE THAT YOU ALL WERE TALKING

06:13:38 ABOUT, A TIGHT BACKUP THERE FOR VEHICLES TO BACK OUT SAFELY.




06:13:44 IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT.

06:13:46 IF YOU HAVE A 150 OR SOMETHING, AND THAT CAR HAS A 24-FOOT

06:13:50 TURNING RADIUS, I UNDERSTAND A SMALLER CAR.

06:13:54 THAT WAS THE CONCERN.

06:13:58 LIKE THE APPLICANT WAS TALKING ABOUT, THERE ARE THINGS THAT

06:14:00 YOU CAN DO TO MAKE IT EASIER TO BACK UP.

06:14:02 BUT WE HAD RECOMMENDED TO PUSH IT BACK TEN FEET.

06:14:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MR. SCOTT, IT WAS A COMBINATION OF ALLEY

06:14:12 SIZE AND THAT APRON SIZE OF THE DRIVEWAY INTO THE GARAGE?

06:14:20 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES.

06:14:20 YOU CAN USE THE FULL WIDTH OF THE ALLEY AS A BACKUP, A

06:14:24 24-FOOT BACKUP, TEN FOOT.

06:14:29 THEY ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER FROM 24 TO 13 FEET WHICH IS

06:14:33 ULTIMATELY A TIGHT BACKUP.

06:14:35 THAT'S WHAT OUR ULTIMATE CONCERN WAS.

06:14:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

06:14:39 IF I CAN GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT, PLEASE.

06:14:44 YOU KNOW, I DON'T REDESIGN FROM THE DAIS, BUT I AM JUST

06:14:51 LETTING YOU KNOW NOW THIS IS A MAJOR CONCERN OF MINE, AND AS

06:14:57 THE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE PRESENTING

06:14:59 RIGHT NOW, I CAN'T VOTE YES FOR THIS.

06:15:04 IF SOMETHING CHANGES BETWEEN NOW AND SECOND READING, IF IT

06:15:08 DOES PASS, THEN I WILL LOOK AT IT FURTHER.

06:15:12 I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND.

06:15:13 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.




06:15:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO I THINK WE SORT OF HAVE CONFLICTING

06:15:23 ISSUES HERE.

06:15:25 MR. LAROCCA, ON THE ONE HAND, I WOULD HOPE THAT WE ALL SEE

06:15:31 THE VALUE OF REAR LOADED GARAGES ON THE ALLEY.

06:15:37 THAT'S WHAT THE ALLEYS ARE THERE FOR.

06:15:40 ORIGINALLY IT WAS FOR SERVICE ALLEYS, AND ISN'T IT WONDERFUL

06:15:44 NOT TO HAVE A BIG DOUBLE CAR GARAGE ON THE FRONT OF THIS

06:15:49 HOUSE?

06:15:51 THESE HOUSES ARE GOING TO BE LOVELY FACING BOULEVARD WITHOUT

06:15:55 BIG DOUBLE GARAGES.

06:15:58 ON THE FLIP SIDE, MR. CITRO ARTICULATED VERY WELL, THERE

06:16:02 MIGHT BE SOME SAFETY CONCERNS.

06:16:04 AND I THINK WHAT I HEARD YOU SAY, JOHN LAROCCA, WAS THAT YOU

06:16:08 ALL MIGHT BE AMENABLE TO A COMPROMISE, AND DO WANT TO

06:16:12 PROVIDE AS LARGE A BACKYARD AS POSSIBLE, AND I SAW THAT WITH

06:16:18 A POSSIBLE SWIMMING POOL.

06:16:20 SO WITH THAT SAID, WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE AS A COMPROMISE

06:16:25 INSTEAD OF 3 FEET TO 5 FEET?

06:16:30 A REQUIREMENT 10 FEET, AND IF WE SPLIT THE BABY, THAT'S 5

06:16:33 FEET.

06:16:34 AND I THINK IF I LIVED IN THAT SITUATION AND I WANTED TO

06:16:40 PARK IN THAT GARAGE I WOULD BACK IN EVERY TIME.

06:16:42 AND I KNOW WE CAN'T REQUIRE THAT AS A CONDITION, BUT I THINK

06:16:46 THAT'S A REALITY, AND I HAVE SEEN THAT IN HYDE PARK WHERE

06:16:49 PEOPLE BACK INTO THESE KIND OF GARAGES, AND THAT WAY WHEN




06:16:52 THEY COME OUT THEY ARE COMING OUT FORWARD, AND THEY HAVE A

06:16:54 LOT BETTER VISIBILITY.

06:16:56 SO I THINK THERE ARE SOME PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS.

06:16:59 BUT PUTTING THAT ASIDE, WE CAN'T PUT THAT ON THE SITE PLAN

06:17:02 OBVIOUSLY, BUT WOULD YOU BE AMENABLE TO APPLY --

06:17:07 >>JOHN LAROCCA: I HAVE JUST SPOKEN WITH MR. DIAZ AND WE HAVE

06:17:10 TALKED ABOUT THIS BEFORE WE MADE OUR PRESENTATION THIS

06:17:12 EVENING, AND AGAIN I KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT THE PD ZONING, I KNOW

06:17:16 WE NEED TO BE AS SPECIFIC AS WE CAN.

06:17:20 I BELIEVE WE ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT GOING FROM A WAIVER FROM

06:17:28 3 TO THE 5 FEET.

06:17:30 WE STILL WANT THE OPPORTUNITY, OBVIOUSLY, TO LOOK AT OTHER

06:17:35 WAYS TO EVEN MAKE THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THOSE GARAGES AND

06:17:39 THAT ALLEY WORK AND SATISFY THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEWERS FOR

06:17:44 COMPATIBILITY.

06:17:47 BUT, YES, WE WILL AGREE --

06:17:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU AGREE TO THE 5 FEET TONIGHT, THEN

06:17:52 THAT WOULD BE HOPEFULLY HOW WE ALL MOVE FORWARD BUT YOU ARE

06:17:58 BOUND BY THAT.

06:17:58 ANYTHING OVER AND ABOVE IN TERMS OF MIRRORS OR WHAT HAVE

06:18:04 YOU, YOU KNOW, THAT'S ALL FINE AND GOOD.

06:18:06 SO 5 FEET --

06:18:10 >>JOHN LAROCCA: TO YOUR QUESTION, MR. DINGFELDER AND MR.

06:18:12 CITRO, ON YOUR QUESTION, WE CERTAINLY AGREE TO THAT AND WE

06:18:15 ARE WILLING IN THE REVISION SHEET AND REVISIONS TO THE PLAN




06:18:17 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING TO MAKE THAT CHANGE TO SHOW

06:18:20 A SETBACK OFF THAT ALLEY TO 5 FEET INSTEAD OF 3.

06:18:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

06:18:28 THEN MR. MIRANDA.

06:18:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU WOULD INQUIRE OF THE STAFF AND MS.

06:18:34 BARNES TO THAT CHANGE, AND IF IT'S GOING TO BE POSSIBLE

06:18:38 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND RING TO BE SEE IF IT CAN BE DONE

06:18:41 LOGISTICALLY.

06:18:43 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:18:44 SO THE FIRST REQUEST WOULD ALLOW REDUCTION IN AISLE WIDTH

06:18:51 FROM 24 FEET TO 11 FEET, AND THE SECOND WAIVER WOULD BE TO

06:18:57 ALLOW REDUCTION IN THE LOCATION STRUCTURAL EDGE OF THE

06:19:02 VEHICULAR ENTRANCE OF A 2 CAR SET BACK OF 2 FEET TO 5 FEET.

06:19:08 BUT I WOULD LIKE JONATHAN SCOTT WITH TRANSPORTATION TO

06:19:12 CONFIRM AS WELL.

06:19:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE HAVEN'T REALLY HAD DISCUSSION ABOUT

06:19:19 THE 24 FEET AND THE 11 FEET.

06:19:21 I DON'T REALLY KNOW IF I EVEN UNDERSTAND HOW THAT COMES INTO

06:19:24 PLAY.

06:19:28 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES.

06:19:29 SO 10 FEET FROM THE ALLEY.

06:19:32 THEN IF YOU ADD THE 5 TO THE PROPERTY LINE ENTRANCE, THAT'S

06:19:38 15 FEET.

06:19:39 THAT WOULD BE FROM 24 TO 15 WOULD BE A NEW WAIVER.

06:19:47 THE STRUCTURAL EDGE, SPECIFICALLY 10 FEET, SO IT WOULD BE




06:19:54 GOING FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET, THOSE WOULD BE THE TWO

06:20:00 MODIFICATIONS, JUST TO CONFIRM ANNIE IS RIGHT.

06:20:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF I COULD, TO WRAP THAT UP, BY SLIDING

06:20:08 THE GARAGE BACK AN ADDITIONAL TWO FEET INSTEAD WHEREOF THE

06:20:14 GARAGE IS TODAY, THEN THE NEW WAIVER REQUEST WOULD BE FROM

06:20:18 24 FEET TO 15 FEET AND FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET.

06:20:26 MR. JONATHAN SCOTT IS NODDING YES FOR THE RECORD.

06:20:31 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: THAT'S CORRECT.

06:20:34 THAT IS CORRECT.

06:20:36 >>JOHN LAROCCA: AND THE APPLICANT CONCURS WITH THAT, AND WE

06:20:39 ARE ASSUMING, WE ARE IN AGREEMENT HERE THAT THAT CHANGE

06:20:42 COULD BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

06:20:44 WE WILL MAKE THAT CHANGE.

06:20:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA.

06:20:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. LAROCCA, MR. DIAZ, JUST THINKING TO

06:20:50 THE FUTURE.

06:20:50 IF THIS WAS 2031, YOUR CAR WOULD TELL YOU ANYWAY YOU WANT TO

06:20:57 BE AS YOU ARE BACKING UP SIDEWAYS, UP OR DOWN, YOU SEE THE

06:21:01 WHOLE THING.

06:21:01 SO I AM JUST THINKING -- I AM NOT SAYING APPLICABLE TO THIS

06:21:06 PETITION BUT I WOULD THINK WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF ALL THESE

06:21:10 ELECTRIC -- YOU WON'T NEED THAT FOR THE CARS BECAUSE THEY

06:21:18 TELL YOU EVERYTHING.

06:21:20 UNFORTUNATELY I PARK BECAUSE I HAVE GOT A BAD BATTERY.

06:21:23 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.




06:21:23 I JUST THOUGHT ABOUT THAT AND WANTED TO SHARE THAT COMMENT

06:21:27 WITH YOU.

06:21:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I HAVEN'T SPOKEN YET.

06:21:30 MY CONCERN WITH THE SETBACK OF THE ALLEY, MY BIGGEST CONCERN

06:21:35 WAS THE AREA, THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, THE

06:21:44 DIFFERENT LOOK ON THE PORCHES, AND THE PATTERN OF THE

06:21:50 NEIGHBORHOOD.

06:21:51 I KNOW THAT AREA VERY, VERY WELL.

06:21:53 AND THERE'S NOT TOO MANY TWO-STORY BUILDINGS IN THAT STRETCH

06:21:57 RIGHT THERE.

06:21:59 SO THAT'S A CONCERN OF MINE.

06:22:00 AND THAT'S WHY I'M LOOKING AT THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THAT LOT,

06:22:05 WHEN I LOOK AT THAT LOT, I LOOK AT THE HOUSES THAT'S

06:22:07 ADJACENT TO IT.

06:22:10 AND I WOULD SEE IF STAFF CAN PUT THAT UP SO COUNCIL CAN SEE

06:22:15 WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT.

06:22:16 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:22:19 CAN I PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN?

06:22:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, YOU CAN.

06:22:22 >>ANNIE BARNES: THANK YOU.

06:22:25 ALSO, WHIM I AM SHOWING MY SCREEN I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW

06:22:31 THAT IF ANY MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE TO THE WAIVERS, THEY CAN

06:22:34 BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

06:22:44 CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?

06:22:45 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I CAN SEE IT.




06:22:47 AND I AM JUST LOOKING AT THAT LOT.

06:22:49 AND THAT'S A RESIDENTIAL AREA.

06:22:53 THOSE ARE ALL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.

06:22:55 AND MY CONCERN IS THE ELEVATION OF TWO NEW BUILDINGS IN THAT

06:23:03 SPACE OVERLOOKING THOSE HOUSES.

06:23:09 THAT CONCERNS ME.

06:23:10 I HAVE GOT TO BE FRANK WITH YOU.

06:23:12 I'M CONCERNED.

06:23:13 AND WE STILL HAVE TO BE MINDFUL OF THE COMMUNITY.

06:23:21 SO THAT BOTHERS ME AT THIS POINT.

06:23:24 I JUST WANT TO MAKE REFERENCE TO THAT.

06:23:29 THAT JUST BOTHERS ME.

06:23:31 ANYONE ELSE?

06:23:37 >>CATE WELLS: CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE RECORD.

06:23:39 THERE'S BEEN SOME DISCUSSION THIS EVENING WITH REGARD TO

06:23:42 PORCHES.

06:23:47 THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN OVERLAY DISTRICT OR

06:23:50 WITHIN ONE OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS.

06:23:53 SO TYPICALLY THE DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE NOT BEFORE COUNCIL OR

06:23:58 WOULD PROVIDE A BASIS FOR DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION.

06:24:02 THAT BEING SAID, THE ISSUE IS NOT, MR. CHAIRMAN, WHICH YOU

06:24:06 JUST BROUGHT UP, THAT IS A COMPONENT THAT WOULD PROPERLY BE

06:24:12 BEFORE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.

06:24:15 I BELIEVE THAT STAFF -- THEIR CONCERN IS ASKING IN THE STAFF

06:24:20 REPORT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO CAUTION COUNCIL MEMBERS, AS YOU




06:24:26 DELIBERATE, PLEASE NOT FOCUS ON DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS.

06:24:31 THANK YOU.

06:24:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MS. WELLS.

06:24:35 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

06:24:38 ALL RIGHT.

06:24:39 NO QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

06:24:40 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS

06:24:42 ITEM?

06:24:50 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.

06:24:51 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

06:24:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?

06:24:57 >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.

06:24:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

06:25:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BEFORE YOU CLOSE, MR. CHAIRMAN.

06:25:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

06:25:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND YOU WILL GET THE LAST WORD, MR.

06:25:09 LAROCCA. BUT BEFORE YOU CLOSE, I THINK YOUR COMMENTS ARE

06:25:12 WELL STATED.

06:25:13 YOU AND I BOTH DRIVE UP AND DOWN THAT NORTH BOULEVARD A LOT,

06:25:18 I'M SURE, AND I WOULD AGREE WE HAVE TRADITIONAL HOMES ALONG

06:25:24 NORTH BOULEVARD.

06:25:26 I WILL NOTE THERE'S A LOT OF PRETTY BIG AND TALL TOWNHOMES

06:25:29 TO THE SOUTH, TOWARD COLUMBUS, MORE AND MORE.

06:25:34 I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE FUTURE HOLD FOR THIS

06:25:37 PARTICULAR BLOCK IN TERMS OF THAT SORT OF THING.




06:25:42 I DO HAVE A QUESTION AND IT'S ALMOST A RHETORICAL QUESTION,

06:25:46 BUT I BELIEVE THAT THESE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE 35 FEET

06:25:52 OR LESS IN HEIGHT, PERIOD, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT OUR CODE

06:25:58 REQUIRES.

06:25:59 YOU ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANY HEIGHT WAIVERS.

06:26:07 >>JOHN LAROCCA: CORRECT.

06:26:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO I THINK PART OF WHAT WE ARE SEEING,

06:26:12 MR. CHAIRMAN, IS THAT MODERN LOOK.

06:26:15 AND THAT'S DIFFERENT, AND MS. WELLS I THINK IS SORT OF

06:26:23 WARNING US A LITTLE BIT.

06:26:24 I THINK WHAT CATE SAID WAS WE ARE COULD ADDRESS MASS AND

06:26:27 SCALE, SIZE, BUT BE CAREFUL NOT TO HAVE LOOK AT DESIGN OF

06:26:33 FRONT PORCHES, AND I APPRECIATE THAT CAUTIONARY STATEMENT.

06:26:38 SO I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT TO EVERYBODY, THIS IS 35 FEET.

06:26:43 IT'S LIKE PRETTY MUCH EVERY OTHER NEW HOUSE IN THE CITY.

06:26:46 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:26:51 THE DIFFERENCE THOUGH IS THIS IS A 40-FOOT WIDE LOT AND

06:26:55 STANDARD EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT DON'T ALLOW 40-FOOT WIDE

06:26:59 LOTS.

06:27:00 AND YOU ARE CORRECT, IN RS-50, RS-60, THE MAX HIGHLIGHT

06:27:03 WOULD BE 35 FEET.

06:27:04 >>MARTIN SHELBY: CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.

06:27:09 IF I COULD JUST ASK STAFF TO QUALIFY, WITH REGARD TO, LET'S

06:27:12 SAY, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SETBACKS AND HEIGHT ARE NOT

06:27:18 CONSIDERED WAIVERS.




06:27:19 IS THAT CORRECT?

06:27:20 BECAUSE IT'S NOT SITE CONTROLLED?

06:27:23 >>ANNIE BARNES: THAT IS CORRECT.

06:27:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: SO A SITE PLAN DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN A

06:27:28 SPECIFIC HEIGHT WAIVER, IT JUST SETS FORTH WHAT THE HEIGHT

06:27:31 OF THAT PROJECT IS, CORRECT?

06:27:34 >>ANNIE BARNES: THAT IS CORRECT.

06:27:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.

06:27:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

06:27:39 NO OTHER FOLKS TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

06:27:42 NOBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK.

06:27:43 MR. LAROCCA, ANY FINAL COMMENTS?

06:27:47 >>JOHN LAROCCA: AGAIN, CHAIRMAN GUDES, I UNDERSTAND AND

06:27:49 RESPECT YOUR CONCERN, AND YOU KNOW THAT NEIGHBORHOOD VERY

06:27:52 WELL.

06:27:53 WITH REGARD TO THE HEIGHT AND THE MASSING AND ANNIE IS

06:27:58 CORRECT ALSO THAT THESE ARE 40-FOOT LOTS.

06:28:00 BUT THE REALITY OF IT IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF THESE STRUCTURES

06:28:03 ARE 31 FEET, THEY DON'T EXCEED 35 IN HEIGHT, AS ONE OF THE

06:28:08 ISSUES, AND IF YOU LOOK AT THEM AS INDIVIDUAL LOTS, YES,

06:28:13 THEY ARE TYPICALLY SMALLER OR NARROWER THAN THE STANDARD

06:28:17 LOTS, BUT THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS ARE LESS THAN 35 FEET,

06:28:21 WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY RIGHT, AND THE SETBACKS OF

06:28:26 EACH OF THOSE LOTS ON THE SIDE, WHICH ARE SIDE YARD

06:28:31 SETBACKS, THE STRUCTURES OF THAT HEIGHT ARE 7 FEET THAT MEET




06:28:34 THE STANDARD CODE REQUIREMENT.

06:28:38 SO JOHN?

06:28:41 >> AND MR. ORLANDO, WHAT MADE ME REALIZE WE CAN BUILD

06:28:50 SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN THE AREA IS BECAUSE I BUILT A HOUSE

06:28:52 ON A 40 FOOT LOT RIGHT OFF OF FRANCIS STREET, AND THAT'S

06:28:56 KIND OF WHERE WE RECOGNIZE THAT IT'S POSSIBLE TO DO THIS,

06:29:00 AND STILL HAVE THE HOUSE TIE IN WITH THE AREA.

06:29:07 >>JOHN LAROCCA: MY COMMENT JUST TO CONCLUDE, I BELIEVE WE

06:29:10 HAVE HAD A VIGOROUS DISCUSSION THIS NIGHT ON THE ISSUES

06:29:14 REGARDING THE HEIGHT AND MASSING.

06:29:16 I BELIEVE THE CHARACTER, NEW DEVELOPMENT IS ALWAYS A CHANGE.

06:29:23 40, 45, 50-FOOT LOTS, THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT IS NEW TO THE

06:29:27 AREA.

06:29:27 A LOT OF, YES, OFFICES AND OTHER HOMES ARE NOT TWO-STORY BUT

06:29:32 THERE'S A LOT OF NEW TWO-STORY HOMES THAT GOING UP IN THE

06:29:35 AREA.

06:29:36 AND THIS, IN MY OPINION ON AN ARTERIAL ROAD, WILL NOT BE OUT

06:29:41 OF CHARACTER AND THAT'S THE POINTED I MADE EARLIER.

06:29:43 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

06:29:44 WE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL, AND

06:29:48 AGAIN THE ONE NOTE IS WE AGREE IN ADDITION TO THE WAIVER

06:29:52 SHEET ON PAGE 6, WE AGREE TO THE WAIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE

06:29:56 SETBACKS FROM THE ALLEY AS STATED DURING THIS MEETING.

06:30:02 THANK YOU.

06:30:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVES TO CLOSE, SECOND BY




06:30:08 MR. MIRANDA.

06:30:09 ALL IN FAVOR?

06:30:10 OPPOSED?

06:30:11 CARRIED.

06:30:11 ALL RIGHT.

06:30:13 MR. MANISCALCO.

06:30:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I KNOW A LOT WAS SAID AND IT'S GOING TO

06:30:18 BE -- THERE'S NOT A REVISION SHEET? YES, THERE IS.

06:30:24 BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING.

06:30:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IN ADDITION TO THE REVISION SHEET AGREED

06:30:30 BY THE APPLICANT AND KNOWN BY STAFF.

06:30:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.

06:30:32 I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING

06:30:34 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL

06:30:37 VICINITY OF 2907½ AND 2909 NORTH BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF

06:30:44 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1

06:30:46 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL

06:30:49 SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,

06:30:52 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WITH

06:30:55 THE REVISION SHEET, AND THE STIPULATION AND/OR ADDITION

06:31:01 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS STATED BY THE APPLICANT

06:31:08 THAT'S ALREADY ON RECORD.

06:31:13 MIRANDA.

06:31:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND THE ZIN IS UNIQUE AND THE WAIVES

06:31:20 WILL NOT POTENTIALLY INTERFERE OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF




06:31:23 OTHERS THAT WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS, AND THE

06:31:26 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWN ON THE SITE PROMOTES AND

06:31:28 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT AT ITS APPROPRIATE LOCATION,

06:31:31 CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS

06:31:33 NEIGHBORHOODS, SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND STRUCTURE.

06:31:38 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED IT.

06:31:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.

06:31:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.

06:31:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR CLARIFICATION IN REGARD TO THE

06:31:50 REVISION SHEET, AS STATED AND ENCOURAGED BY JONATHAN, THE

06:31:57 REVISED -- AND APPROVED BY THE PETITIONER, THE REVISION IS

06:32:01 24 FEET DOWN TO 15 FEET FOR THE FIRST WAIVER AND 10 FEET

06:32:07 DOWN TO 5 FEET FOR THE SECOND WAIVER.

06:32:10 MR. LAROCCA, YOU CONCUR WITH THAT?

06:32:14 >>JOHN LAROCCA: THAT IS CORRECT.

06:32:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO, MIRANDA SECONDED.

06:32:24 ROLL CALL.

06:32:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

06:32:26 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

06:32:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.

06:32:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

06:32:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

06:32:31 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

06:32:32 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

06:32:33 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CITRO VOTING NO.




06:32:36 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 4th

06:32:38 AT 930 A.M.

06:32:42 >>JOHN LAROCCA: THANK YOU.

06:32:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 7.

06:32:47 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:32:50 CASE REZ 21-79, THE PROJECT AND REZONING AT 8610 AND 8612

06:32:59 SEMINOLE AND 8619 NORTH DIXON AVENUE.

06:33:02 PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS-50 AND CG TO PD RESIDENTIAL

06:33:06 MULTIFAMILY.

06:33:07 I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO JENNIFER MALONE.

06:33:11 >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.

06:33:13 THANK YOU, ZAIN.

06:33:14 2179, THIS IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, AND

06:33:17 MORE SPECIFICALLY TO THE SULPHUR SPRINGS NEIGHBORHOOD.

06:33:21 WE HAVE -- RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET ABOUT A QUARTER MILE TO

06:33:26 THE NORTH OF THIS SITE, PARK IS ABOUT A HALF MILE EAST OF

06:33:31 THE SITE AND THEN HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.

06:33:40 WE HAVE FLORIDA AVENUE TO THE WEST.

06:33:44 SO SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS HERE.

06:33:49 WE HAVE THE INTERSTATE.

06:33:52 THE CONTRACT BY FDOT, FAMILY IN THE AREA THAT'S -- IN THE

06:33:59 AREA, IS COMMERCIAL USES, ALONG THIS PORTION OF EAST YUKON,

06:34:05 AND SOUTH OF THE SITE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED

06:34:07 RESIDENTIAL.

06:34:10 WE CLEARLY SEE THAT PATTERN WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND




06:34:13 USE MAP.

06:34:13 THE FUTURE LAND USE SUSTAINED FUTURE LAND USE TO THE NORTH

06:34:19 AND THEN NORTHWEST.

06:34:23 FORT NORTH OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 35, AS MENTIONED

06:34:28 EARLIER, AND TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL 10, TO THE

06:34:32 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.

06:34:34 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.

06:34:35 SO IT IS -- IT DOES HAVE THIS POTENTIAL FOR MIXED USE

06:34:40 DEVELOPMENT ON THE SUBJECT SITE, LAND USE HAS POTENTIAL FOR

06:34:45 COMMERCIAL USES AND MULTIFAMILY, OR MIXTURE OF ALL OF THEM.

06:34:53 IT IS CONSISTENT WITH TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

06:34:55 THE APPLICANT IS YOUTHS UTILIZING FLOOR AREA RATIO IN THIS

06:34:59 INSTANCE FOR THE DWELLING UNIT, AND F.A.R. OF 0.34, WE DID

06:35:08 LOOK AT THE EXISTING F.A.R. AT THE SITE, AND IT LOOKS LIKE

06:35:12 THE EXISTING INTENSITY IS .3.

06:35:15 SO THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH COMPATIBLE EXISTING INTENSITY IN

06:35:20 THE AREA.

06:35:22 WE DID FIND IT CONSISTENT.

06:35:25 PLANNING COMMISSION IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE DESIGN AND HOW THE

06:35:29 ENTRANCES TO THE UNIT SIDEWALKS ON EAST YUKON AND DIXON

06:35:33 AVENUE, AND ENTRANCES, AND FRONT DOORS WITH SIDEWALKS.

06:35:39 WE ALSO FOUND THE PARKING IN THE REAR OF THE SITE WITH MIXED

06:35:46 USE POLICY.

06:35:47 AGAIN, THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE STRATEGY, AND EMPLOYMENT

06:35:55 SERVICES WHICH THIS IS.




06:35:59 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

06:36:01 THAT CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION.

06:36:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE?

06:36:05 ANY QUESTIONS?

06:36:06 ALL RIGHT.

06:36:06 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:36:11 CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN?

06:36:16 WONDERFUL.

06:36:17 THANK YOU.

06:36:18 CASE REZ 21-79, THE APPLICANT AND REPRESENTATIVE IS MARGARET

06:36:22 ROGERS, PROPERTY ADDRESS 8610 AND 8612 SEMINOLE AVENUE AND

06:36:32 8619 NORTH DIXON AVENUE.

06:36:34 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD

06:36:37 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.

06:36:39 THERE ARE FOUR WAIVERS REQUESTED HERE.

06:36:41 THE FIRST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 35 SPOTS TO

06:36:45 24, WHICH IS A 31% REDUCTION.

06:36:47 THE SECOND WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED DISTANCE BETWEEN

06:36:50 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, REQUIRED 21 FEET TO 9 FEET.

06:36:54 THE THIRD IS TO REQUEST TO PAY TO THE TREE TRUST FUND FOR

06:37:01 MITIGATION TREES THAT CANNOT BE PLANTED ON-SITE.

06:37:03 THE FOURTH IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 350 SQUARE FEET OF

06:37:07 GREEN SPACE PER UNIT TO 276 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.

06:37:11 THE REDUCTION OF GREEN SPACE IS SUBJECT TO THE LANDSCAPE IN

06:37:13 LIEU FEES THAT WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.




06:37:19 AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE PROPERTY IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED.

06:37:24 THE PROPERTY CONSISTS OF THREE PARCELS HERE.

06:37:26 THE SITE IS AREA 24,987 SQUARE FEET OR .574 ACRES.

06:37:37 NEXT SLIDE.

06:37:38 THE TOTAL BUILDING AREA HERE OF THE TWO BUILDINGS IS 8,494

06:37:45 SQUARE FEET, BUILDING ONE WE HAVE HERE IS 3,094 SQUARE FEET,

06:37:50 AND BUILDING TWO IS 5,400 SQUARE FEET.

06:37:56 GOING BACK AS YOU SEE TO THE NORTH, YOU WILL HAVE OWNED BY

06:38:04 FDOT, HIMSELF A HOME DEPOT TO THE NORTH.

06:38:06 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE A NONPROFIT

06:38:09 ORGANIZATION FACILITY HERE, NOT SHOWN THE SLIDE, THE PICTURE

06:38:15 IS COMING UP, AND TO THE EAST TO THE SOUTH RESIDENTIAL

06:38:18 SINGLE-FAMILY ALSO SHOWN IN THE SLIDES COMING UP.

06:38:22 VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE IS ON NORTH DIXON AVENUE, AND

06:38:26 ALSO ON NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE.

06:38:33 AND WE GO ONTO THE SITE PLAN HERE.

06:38:35 YOU WILL SEE THAT THIS BUILDING, BUILDING ONE, IS ALREADY

06:38:39 EXISTING AND YOU WILL SEE IN THE PICTURES.

06:38:41 ALL PARKING IS ON SURFACE, AND ALSO UNDERNEATH A LITTLE

06:38:47 COVERED PATIO PORTION HERE.

06:38:49 YOU WILL HAVE ALSO PARKING FOR RESIDENTS.

06:38:54 THERE IS A TOTAL OF 28 DWELLING UNITS HERE.

06:38:57 BUILDING ONE HAS TEN UNITS, AND BUILDING TWO HAS 18 UNITS.

06:39:01 AND YOU WILL SEE THE UNIT ON 9, 10, AND BUILDING TWO, 18.

06:39:10 THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HIGHLIGHT HERE IS 30 FEET.




06:39:12 COMING TO THE PICTURE YOU WILL SEE SOME OF THE PORTION OF

06:39:17 THE SITE IS VACANT.

06:39:18 AND THEN ALSO ALONG THE WEST SIDE YOU WILL SEE THE CURRENT

06:39:22 EXISTING BUILDING, BUILDING ONE.

06:39:27 TO THE NEAR NORTH OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE THE FDOT TRANSIT

06:39:31 CENTER AND ALSO SEE THE HOME DEPOT.

06:39:35 A LITTLE BETTER PICTURE OF THE TRANSFER CENTER HERE TO THE

06:39:38 NORTH.

06:39:39 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE THE RESIDENTIAL

06:39:42 SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.

06:39:44 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE RESIDENTIAL

06:39:46 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.

06:39:48 AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE THE NONPROFIT

06:39:51 ORGANIZATION FACILITY.

06:39:56 BASED ON THE REVIEW, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF

06:39:59 HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND THE REQUEST

06:40:02 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

06:40:05 SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE

06:40:07 APPLICATION, FURTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN MUST BE

06:40:10 COMPLETED BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE

06:40:12 ORDINANCE AS STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET.

06:40:15 THANK YOU.

06:40:15 I AM HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.

06:40:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER.

06:40:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.




06:40:26 ZAIN AND/OR MAYBE CATE OR WHATEVER ATTORNEY WE HAVE IN THE

06:40:31 WINGS, AT THE BOTTOM IT MAKES REFERENCE TO CATHOLIC

06:40:37 CHARITIES, THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SO I IMAGINE IT'S PROBABLY

06:40:40 THE CURRENT -- PERHAPS THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER, AND SHE

06:40:48 CAN EXPLAIN THAT TO US.

06:40:50 ARE THERE ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR AGREEMENTS ASSOCIATED

06:40:53 WITH THIS PROPERTY AS BEING AFFORDABLE HOUSING?

06:40:57 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:41:01 WE CAN DO COUNCIL CONDITIONS, FOUR CONDITIONS, IN FACT.

06:41:04 WE CAN ADDRESS THE NUMBER OF UNITS.

06:41:07 THE AMI PERCENTAGE.

06:41:09 THE DICTATION OF AFFORDABILITY FOR 30 YEARS.

06:41:12 AND ALSO FILE FOR RESTRICTIVE COVENANT NEED.

06:41:15 THOSE THINGS CAN GONE WITH COUNCIL CONDITIONS.

06:41:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE THOSE PART OF THE SITE PLAN OR A

06:41:20 SEPARATE AGREEMENT?

06:41:21 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: NO, SIR, THE APPLICANT MUST AGREE ON THIS.

06:41:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MS. WELLS?

06:41:30 >>CATE WELLS: THE APPLICATION ITSELF INDICATED THAT THIS IS

06:41:33 AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, SO IF THE APPLICANT CAN

06:41:36 ADDRESS THOSE DETAILS THAT ZAIN HAS HIGHLIGHTED, AND THOSE

06:41:41 ARE CONDITIONS THAT CAN BE ADDED TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN

06:41:44 FIRST AND SECOND READING.

06:41:46 AND THEN OF COURSE THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS AGREED TO,

06:41:50 RECORDED.




06:41:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW WE ARE ONLY SUPPOSED TO STAY

06:41:57 WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS PROJECT, BUT IN REGARD TO A RECENT

06:42:01 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT THAT COUNCIL SAW, THERE WAS A

06:42:04 WHOLE AGREEMENT, SIDE AGREEMENT, AND I THINK IT EVEN

06:42:11 ADDRESSED INSPECTIONS, ENFORCEABILITY, YOU KNOW, THAT SORT

06:42:16 OF THING.

06:42:16 IS THERE A REASON WE WOULDN'T BE DOING THAT OR PROPOSING

06:42:19 THAT HERE?

06:42:22 >>CATE WELLS: IN THAT SITUATION, THEY WERE ASKING FOR AN

06:42:24 INCREASE IN DENSITY FROM 30 TO 35 DWELLING UNITS TO THE

06:42:28 ANGER.

06:42:29 IN SECTION 27-140 OF OUR CODE, THERE WERE REQUIRED TO ENTER

06:42:35 INTO A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT AND THAT IS LANGUAGE THAT

06:42:37 THEY WORKED OUT.

06:42:41 THIS COULD BE IMPLEMENTED.

06:42:42 AND THAT AGREEMENT WILL COME BEFORE COUNCIL NEXT WEEK WHEN

06:42:45 YOU CONSIDER ASKING [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] AND WE CAN LOOK AT

06:42:51 WHAT TYPE OF LANGUAGE WOULD NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE

06:42:55 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT TO ENSURE THAT THE PROGRAM WOULD BE

06:42:59 OPERATED IN A SIMILAR FASHION, AND WITH COORDINATION WITH

06:43:03 OUR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY.

06:43:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND MRS. MAI, THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN

06:43:11 DISCUSSED WITH THIS PETITIONER, REPRESENTATIVE?

06:43:14 >> TU-MAI: WE DO AGREE ON THE CONDITIONS.

06:43:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T MEAN TO GET AHEAD OF




06:43:28 YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

06:43:29 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).

06:43:35 >> I DO.

06:43:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND I APOLOGIZE, MR. CHAIRMAN.

06:43:37 I DIDN'T MEAN TO JUMP AHEAD.

06:43:39 I JUST WANTED TO GET THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING ISSUE OUT ON

06:43:42 THE FLOOR.

06:43:47 ONCE AGAIN, ONCE AGAIN --

06:43:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.

06:43:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MRS. MAI, YOU CAN MAKE YOUR

06:43:57 PRESENTATION.

06:43:59 >> AGAIN, MY NAME IS TU MAI, TU MAI, INC, HERE REPRESENTING

06:44:04 APPLICANT.

06:44:05 AS STAFF HAS STATED PETITION IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THREE

06:44:11 PARCELS, 099143, 099144 AND 099148 FROM RS-50 AND CG TO PD,

06:44:21 TOTAL LAND IS 0.574 ACRES WITH A FUTURE LAND USE OF CMU-35.

06:44:28 IT IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION

06:44:30 OF EAST WHY YOU CON STREET AND NORTH DIXON AVENUE.

06:44:34 THE PARCELS ARE IN THE SULPHUR SPRINGS NEIGHBORHOOD AND

06:44:37 WATER AND SEWER ARE PROVIDED BY THE CITY.

06:44:39 CURRENTLY THE PARCELS ARE OWNED BY CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND

06:44:42 ARE AS FOLLOWS:

06:44:44 099143 ZONE EG, 0.11 ACRES, CURRENTLY A VACANT COMMERCIAL

06:44:55 PARCEL.

06:44:56 099144 IS ZONED RS-50.




06:44:58 THE PARCEL IS 0.12 ACRES AND IS CURRENTLY A VACANT

06:45:02 RESIDENTIAL PARCEL.

06:45:03 099148 IS ZONED CG, THE PARCEL HAS TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS,

06:45:10 ONE FOR AN OFFICE USE AND THE OTHER FOR A WAREHOUSE AND

06:45:14 STORAGE USE.

06:45:15 THE EXISTING STRUCTURE FRONTING NORTH DIXON AVENUE WILL BE

06:45:18 CONVERTED INTO TEN UNITS.

06:45:21 THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE AND STORAGE WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND

06:45:25 USE 3600 SQUARE FEET TWO-STORY BUILDING WILL BE BUILT TO

06:45:30 PROVIDE ONE ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND 127 EFFICIENCY UNIT ON

06:45:35 THE SECOND FLOOR.

06:45:36 THEREFORE THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO

06:45:39 PD FROM 28 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FOR 44 INDIVIDUAL.

06:45:44 A LITTLE BIT ABOUT CATHOLIC CHARITIES.

06:45:47 IT IS A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION.

06:45:49 THE ORGANIZATION WAS FOUNDED MORE THAN A CENTURY AGO BY MEN

06:45:53 AND WOMEN WHO BELIEVE THE COLLECTIVE EFFORTS OF THE CHURCH

06:45:56 CAN FAITHFULLY SERVE PEOPLE IN NEED TO CHANGE THE POLICY OF

06:45:59 POVERTY IN OUR NATION.

06:46:01 CATHOLIC CHARITIES HELPS PEOPLE REGARDLESS OF THEIR FAITH

06:46:04 WHO ARE STRUGGLING WITH POVERTY AND OVERCOME BY OTHER

06:46:09 COMPLEX ISSUES.

06:46:10 CATHOLIC CHARITIES MAKES PROGRESS TOWARDS PROVIDING HELP AND

06:46:14 HOPE TO INDIVIDUALS IN THE COMMUNITY AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY

06:46:18 AND RECOGNIZE THE GROWING NEED TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING




06:46:20 FOR INDIVIDUALS IN THE WORKFORCE.

06:46:23 THIS PATH IS SO IMPORTANT FOR OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE IT

06:46:25 PROVIDES A BASIC NEED WHICH IS HOUSING.

06:46:27 A ROOF OVER THESE INDIVIDUALS' HEADS AND SAFE PLACE TO LAY

06:46:31 THEIR HEADS DOWN ALTERNATE WITHOUT THE FEAR OF GETTING

06:46:33 KICKED OUT.

06:46:35 AS STATED 28 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE WELL BELOW THE LEVEL

06:46:39 F.A.R.

06:46:40 IN ADDITION, APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING FOUR WAIVERS WHICH

06:46:44 MR. HUSAIN STATED.

06:46:46 WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE STAFF, THE TRANSPORTATION STAFF FINDS

06:46:49 THE REDUCTION OF PARKING SPACES FROM 35 TO 24 AS EXCESSIVE.

06:46:55 HOWEVER, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT AN OVERWHELMING

06:46:59 MAJORITY OF THESE INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BE OCCUPYING THESE

06:47:02 UNITS DO NOT OWN VEHICLES SINCE THEY CANNOT AFFORD IT.

06:47:05 THE FUTURE OCCUPANTS WILL USE PUBLIC TRANSIT.

06:47:09 AS STATED THERE IS A NEW STATION APPROXIMATELY 366 FEET

06:47:13 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

06:47:15 IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN.

06:47:27 IS IT POSSIBLE TO SHARE MY SCREEN?

06:47:33 IS MY SCREEN ON?

06:47:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MADAM CLERK?

06:47:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST EXPAND IT OUT.

06:47:41 ONE MORE TIME.

06:47:50 TU-MAI: CAN YOU SEE IT?




06:48:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN SEE IT.

06:48:01 >> AS STATED THERE'S A NEW CONTRACT FOR A STATION DIRECTLY

06:48:07 ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR SUBJECT SITE.

06:48:09 THERE ARE ALSO FOUR ADDITIONAL SPOTS LOCATED WEST OF THE

06:48:13 SUBJECT SITE.

06:48:14 AS PLANNING COMMISSION STATED, IT IS WITHIN A QUARTER MILE

06:48:19 TRANSIT STATION TO THE WEST OF THE SITE AT THE INTERSECTION

06:48:21 OF NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND YUKON STREET.

06:48:24 THIS TRANSIT STOP IS SERVED BY HART ROUTE NUMBER 1

06:48:29 CONNECTING TO THE SUBJECT SITE IN DOWNTOWN TAMPA, IN

06:48:34 ADDITION TRANSIT STOP SERVED HART ROUTE 14 AND 16.

06:48:40 LASTLY, THIS PROJECT WE BELIEVE SUPPORTS THE GOALS,

06:48:42 OBJECTIVES, THE POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

06:48:46 IT WOULD PROVIDE MORE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING CHOICES FOR FUTURE

06:48:50 POPULATION GROWTH WHILE ALSO CREATING ADDITIONAL HOUSING

06:48:53 OPPORTUNITIES CONSISTENT WITH THE FORM STRATEGY.

06:48:59 IT IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

06:49:02 SUCH AS HOME DEPOT, WALMART, FLORIDA LAND, OFFICE CENTER AND

06:49:07 AMENITIES SUCH AS CHENEY PARK A HALF MILE EAST OF THE

06:49:12 SUBJECT SITE AND EAST OF THE PARK.

06:49:15 SO THERE ARE ALSO MANY EMPLOYMENT CENTERS TO THE EAST ALONG

06:49:21 EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD SUCH AS BUSCH GARDENS, 2.9 MILES, AND

06:49:25 ADVENTURE ISLAND WHICH IS 3.5 MILES AWAY.

06:49:28 TO CONCLUDE, WE CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS

06:49:33 OF CONSISTENT AS THE CITY USES LAND USES EFFICIENTLY AND




06:49:37 PURSUES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS ECONOMICALLY SOUND AS

06:49:40 WELL AS MAXIMIZES UNDERUTILIZED AND VACANT SITE.

06:49:44 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THIS

06:49:46 ZONING BASED ON ALL THE CONSIDERATIONS AS PRESENTED TO YOU

06:49:49 TONIGHT.

06:49:50 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

06:49:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

06:49:58 ALL RIGHT.

06:49:58 NO QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

06:49:59 ANYONE HERE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?

06:50:03 I'M SORRY, DID YOU PUT YOUR HAND UP?

06:50:06 >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU. COUNCIL RAISED THE ISSUE OF

06:50:10 AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE UNITS

06:50:17 WILL BE USED FOR WORKFORCE UNITS.

06:50:20 IN THE EVENT THAT IT RECEIVES FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION THIS

06:50:25 EVENING I WOULD ASK THE APPLICANT FOR PURPOSES OF THE

06:50:27 AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING,

06:50:32 IF SHE COULD STATE FOR THE RECORD WHAT PERCENTAGE AMI WOULD

06:50:37 BE THE TARGET FOR THE TENANTS AT THIS DEVELOPMENT.

06:50:41 I KNOW THAT WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL HAS APPROVED OTHER

06:50:45 PROJECTS WHERE REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN DENSITY, THE AMI

06:50:56 THAT WAS GOING TO BE ADDRESSED THERE IS BETWEEN 80% AND

06:50:59 120%.

06:51:00 AND I WOULD ASK IF THE CLIENT HAS IDENTIFIED WHAT THAT

06:51:05 PERCENTAGE IS GOING TO BE FOR PURPOSES OF WORKFORCE HOUSING.




06:51:08 BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE THAT AS A CONDITION ON THE SITE

06:51:10 PLAN.

06:51:11 >> TU-MAI: I CAN CONFER WITH MY CLIENT TO ADDRESS THE

06:51:19 PERCENTAGE BUT I DO NOT HAVE THAT AT THIS TIME, THE

06:51:21 PERCENTAGE.

06:51:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT.

06:51:29 SO MS. WELLS, I DON'T WANT TO DELAY THIS PROJECT IF WE CAN

06:51:39 AVOID IT BUT IT SEEMS TO ME FROM ALL THE DIALOGUE,

06:51:41 ESPECIALLY FROM YOU, THAT IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL TO HAVE

06:51:45 THAT KIND OF INFORMATION ON THE SITE PLAN BEFORE SECOND

06:51:50 READING, OR PERHAPS WE CAN MAKE A REFERENCE ON THE SITE PLAN

06:51:56 TONIGHT TO AN ATTACHMENT THAT WOULD BE PERHAPS AN AGREEMENT

06:52:02 FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

06:52:08 THE CITY AND MS. MAI'S CLIENT.

06:52:14 I AM JUST TRYING TO BE CREATIVE HERE, AND NOT HOLD UP A GOOD

06:52:20 PROJECT.

06:52:20 BUT AT THE SAME TIME -- AND I WANT EVERYBODY TO UNDERSTAND

06:52:24 WHO IS LISTENING, IT'S ONE THING FOR FOLKS -- AND I AM NOT

06:52:28 SAYING THAT CATHOLIC CHARITIES OR MS. MAI WOULD PROPOSE

06:52:31 THIS, BUT YOU KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE COME TO US AND TALK ABOUT

06:52:35 AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT IF WE DON'T CODIFY IT AND DON'T HAVE

06:52:38 ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS AND OTHER LEGAL CONSTRAINTS, THEN

06:52:43 THERE'S NOTHING ANYBODY CAN DO FIVE YEARS LATER WHEN WE

06:52:47 REALIZE THAT IT'S NO LONGER AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE

06:52:50 PROJECT HAS BEEN SOLD FOR MARKET RATE.




06:52:52 AND MS. MAI, YOU UNDERSTAND, I AM NOT SAYING YOU OR YOUR

06:52:58 CLIENT.

06:52:58 >>CATE WELLS: IF I MAY, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, MS. MAI HAS

06:53:03 INDICATED ON THE RECORD THAT THIS WILL BE AN AFFORDABLE

06:53:05 HOUSING PROJECT, IF IT RECEIVES FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION THIS

06:53:08 EVENING, I WOULD ASK COUNCIL TO ALLOW US THE STAFF TO WORK

06:53:13 WITH MS. MAI'S CLIENT TO IDENTIFY THE AMI PERCENTAGE THAT

06:53:18 WOULD BE THEN INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN SO IT WOULD STILL BE

06:53:21 ADDRESSED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND THAT

06:53:24 REQUIREMENT WOULD STILL BE INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN BEFORE

06:53:29 IT'S CERTIFIED FOR YOUR APPROVAL ON SECOND READING.

06:53:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SOUNDS GOOD.

06:53:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

06:53:37 WELL, ANYONE ON THE -- ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK

06:53:40 TO THIS ITEM?

06:53:43 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT GROWTH MAN MANAGEMENT.

06:53:45 THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO BE SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

06:53:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MADAM CLERK, ANYONE REGISTERED?

06:53:50 >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.

06:53:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA MOVED TO CLOSE.

06:53:54 MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED.

06:53:56 MOTION CARRIED.

06:53:57 MR. CARLSON.

06:53:59 >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ 21-79,

06:54:06 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,




06:54:08 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF

06:54:10 8610 AND 8612 SEMINOLE HEAVE AND 8619 NORTH DIXON AVENUE IN

06:54:15 THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED

06:54:18 IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50

06:54:21 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD

06:54:24 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN

06:54:27 EFFECTIVE DATE, INCLUDING THE CHANGES MADE TO THE SITE PLAN

06:54:33 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

06:54:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MAY I ADD THAT THE DESIGN FOR THE

06:54:41 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IN NEED OF

06:54:44 WAIVERS, THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY

06:54:47 INTERFERE WITH OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE

06:54:51 PROPERTIES WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS, ALSO THAT THE

06:54:53 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES

06:54:56 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION,

06:54:59 CHARACTER, COMPATIBILITY TO THE SURROUNDING PROPOSED USE FOR

06:55:05 THE MOST EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND

06:55:09 STRUCTURE.

06:55:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVED BY MR. CARLSON.

06:55:13 ADD-ON BY MR. MIRANDA.

06:55:16 SECOND?

06:55:18 SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.

06:55:19 ROLL CALL.

06:55:20 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

06:55:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.




06:55:22 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

06:55:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

06:55:25 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.

06:55:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

06:55:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

06:55:28 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

06:55:29 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 4th

06:55:32 AT 9:30 A.M.

06:55:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

06:55:37 THANK YOU.

06:55:39 NUMBER 9.

06:55:40 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

06:55:44 ITEM NUMBER 9 IS REZ 21-83.

06:55:47 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1511 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

06:55:52 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PLANNED

06:55:55 DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF

06:55:58 THE PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED

06:56:02 DWELLING.

06:56:03 ALTERNATIVE PRESENTATION -- I WILL TURN OVER PRESENTATION TO

06:56:08 THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN I WILL CONCLUDE MINE.

06:56:10 >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION.

06:56:15 AS SHE STATED THIS IS REZ 21-83.

06:56:20 TRAVELING TO THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS

06:56:22 ITEM.

06:56:23 EVACUATION ZONE C.




06:56:25 RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS CLIFTON TENNIS CENTER WITHIN A HALF

06:56:29 MILE OF THE NORTHWEST OF THE SITE.

06:56:32 AND THERE'S -- ABOUT 700 FEET OF THE TITHE SITE AT SOUTH

06:56:42 DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.

06:56:43 SO A TRANSIT STOP TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, ALSO SOUTH DALE

06:56:50 MABRY HIGHWAY, COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA, WE HAVE PUBLIX

06:56:55 NEARBY AND COMMERCIAL USES ALONG NEPTUNE AVENUE.

06:57:01 AND AS REFLECTED ON THE SITE PLAN, SPROUTS, TO THE NORTH,

06:57:10 EAST, WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE THAT ALLOWS COMMERCIAL USES

06:57:13 IN THAT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, RESIDENTIAL 6, THAT'S

06:57:19 THE YELLOW.

06:57:21 THE RESIDENTIAL 6 ALLOWS FOR DENSITY OF 6 DWELLING UNITS PER

06:57:24 ACRE.

06:57:26 AND WHEN WE LOOK AT THE OVERALL DENSITY, THE SITE WOULD HAVE

06:57:31 A DENSITY OF 5.20 UNITS PER ACRE.

06:57:36 RESIDENTIAL 6 DENSITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IT WOULD BE

06:57:41 COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 6 FUTURE LAND

06:57:46 USE DESIGNATION.

06:57:47 WE ALSO FOUND THE PROPOSED REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR

06:57:49 DEVELOPMENT TO FORM HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING

06:57:53 RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG THIS PORTION OF SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

06:57:57 AGAIN, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON THE

06:58:02 SITE PLAN, [~AUDIO CUTS OUT~]

06:58:10 AND CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN AND POLICY DIRECTION OF

06:58:12 RESIDENTIAL 6 FUTURE LAND USE.




06:58:14 I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

06:58:15 THANK YOU.

06:58:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE?

06:58:18 ALL RIGHT.

06:58:18 >>ANNIE BARNES: I'M GOING TO SHARE MY SCREEN.

06:58:42 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 1511 SOUTH CHURCH

06:58:45 AVENUE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO

06:58:47 ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING.

06:58:52 THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY WAIVERS.

06:58:56 THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF SOUTH 10 FEET OF LOT 5 AND ALL OF

06:59:01 LOT 6 OF THE SUBDIVISION PLATTED IN 1925.

06:59:05 THIS IS THE SITE PLAN -- I APOLOGIZE, THIS IS THE SURVEY

06:59:09 PROVIDED SHOWING THE LOT.

06:59:12 AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED SHOWING THE PROPOSED

06:59:15 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, VEHICULAR

06:59:19 ACCESS IS PROVIDED FROM SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

06:59:23 THESE WERE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

06:59:30 SHOWN HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING,

06:59:34 PROPERTY DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, DEVELOPED

06:59:37 TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING.

06:59:40 PROPERTY DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN

06:59:43 THE RS-75 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT AND

06:59:46 DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.

06:59:49 PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE EAST IS LOCATED WITHIN THE

06:59:53 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT AND DEVELOPED WITH A




06:59:55 SHOPPING CENTER.

06:59:56 PROPERTY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS ZONED PD AND DEVELOPED

07:00:00 AS BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL PROPERTY.

07:00:03 SO HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:00:08 IT IS SHOWN HERE AS JAYS ANTI-ANT AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT

07:00:11 SITE ALONG SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

07:00:14 AND THIS IS LOCATED EAST AND ACROSS SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

07:00:22 THIS IS THE PROPERTY ADJACENT NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:00:29 I APOLOGIZE.

07:00:30 THIS IS AT THE PROPERTY EDGE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:00:34 THIS IS THE SITE EAST OF THE PROPERTY.

07:00:38 AND THEN THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF WEST NEPTUNE STREET AND

07:00:42 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE.

07:00:47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION

07:00:49 AND FINDS THE OVERALL LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA

07:00:54 CODE OF ORDINANCES.

07:00:55 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE

07:00:57 APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

07:01:00 THE ORDINANCE IN THE REVISION SHEET APPROVING THE

07:01:03 APPLICATION.

07:01:03 AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

07:01:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. BARNES?

07:01:08 ALL RIGHT.

07:01:09 WE WILL GO TO THE APPLICANT.

07:01:10 >> GOOD EVENING.




07:01:15 KEVIN ROBLES.

07:01:16 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

07:01:18 THIS IS -- FIRST OF ALL THANKS TO STAFF.

07:01:22 THEY DID A VERY GOOD JOB ARTICULATING IT.

07:01:24 THIS IS A VERY, VERY OLD PD, ORIGINALLY WAS OFFICE, DOESN'T

07:01:29 EVEN FOLLOW THE SAME CODE THAT WE CURRENTLY USE TODAY

07:01:33 BECAUSE THERE WAS A CODE CHANGE, AND A REWRITE OF THE CODE

07:01:38 SUBSEQUENT TO THIS ORIGINAL PD.

07:01:40 I REALLY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD.

07:01:42 WE RECEIVED NO PUBLIC COMMENT, NOR ANY COMMENT FROM THE

07:01:47 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, AND I THINK STAFF KIND OF

07:01:51 EXPLAINED EVERYTHING.

07:01:52 IF I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL, I WILL BE HAPPY

07:01:54 TO.

07:01:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:01:57 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:01:59 ALL RIGHT, MR. ANYONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR?

07:02:13 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS

07:02:14 ITEM.

07:02:15 THANK YOU.

07:02:16 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?

07:02:18 >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.

07:02:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO CLOSE.

07:02:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT.

07:02:23 ALL IN FAVOR?




07:02:25 OPPOSED?

07:02:26 MOTION CARRIES.

07:02:26 MR. CITRO.

07:02:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE REZ 21-83.

07:02:31 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,

07:02:34 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY

07:02:36 OF 1511 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA

07:02:40 AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING

07:02:43 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, GENERAL

07:02:47 OFFICE, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,

07:02:50 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, EXCUSE ME, THAT THE PETITIONER HAS

07:02:58 MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF TO A COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

07:03:01 AS THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN

07:03:05 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THERE ARE

07:03:09 REVISIONS THAT NEED TO BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND

07:03:12 READING.

07:03:14 THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE

07:03:16 DENSITY APPLICATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND WILL

07:03:24 NOT BE CHARACTERISTIC FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE

07:03:26 PORTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY

07:03:29 9.2.1 AND 9.3.8, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

07:03:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.

07:03:40 ROLL CALL.

07:03:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

07:03:45 >>LUIS VIERA: (NO RESPONSE).




07:03:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

07:03:53 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

07:03:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES.

07:03:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

07:03:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

07:03:58 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT

07:04:02 VOTE.

07:04:03 SECOND READING WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER --

07:04:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, WITH REGARD TO ITEM NUMBER

07:04:12 11, I THINK WE HAVE SOME PRELIMINARY MATTERS THAT NEED TO BE

07:04:15 DISCUSSED SO I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE DO THAT BEFORE WE ASK

07:04:18 STAFF FOR INTRODUCTION AND PRESENTATION.

07:04:21 I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS A REQUEST.

07:04:27 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

07:04:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I COULD.

07:04:31 I WILL SAVE THE APPLICANT AND HER ATTORNEY THE TROUBLE.

07:04:38 MR. MICHELINI IS HERE, FOR THE RECORD, AND I BELIEVE MISS

07:04:47 DOUCETTE, ATTORNEY, IS HERE, AND MISS DOUCETTE AND HER

07:04:51 PARTNER MR. LOEB HAS PRESENTED THE CITY WITH A REQUEST THAT

07:04:53 I RECUSE MYSELF ON BEHALF OF MR. MICHELINI AND HIS LAND USE

07:04:58 CLIENT, AND I CAREFULLY REVIEWED MR. MICHELINI'S ATTORNEY'S

07:05:02 REQUEST FOR ME TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM CONSIDERATION OF THIS

07:05:05 APPLICATION.

07:05:05 I'M QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THE STATUTORY AND DUE PROCESS

07:05:08 REQUIREMENTS REGARDING QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SUCH AS




07:05:11 THIS THAT MUST BE CONDUCTED IN A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL MANNER.

07:05:15 I BELIEVE I CAN BE A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL DECISION MAKER IN

07:05:19 THIS PARTICULAR CASE THIS EVENING AND ANY OTHER EVENING IN

07:05:21 REGARD TO ANYBODY'S CASES, IN ANY CASE THAT MR. MICHELINI

07:05:27 PRESENTS.

07:05:27 HOWEVER, IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, AND BASED ON THE ADVICE

07:05:31 OF LEGAL COUNSEL, I AM GOING TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM

07:05:34 PARTICIPATION AND VOTING ON THIS MATTER THIS EVENING TO

07:05:38 ELIMINATE EVEN THE APPEARANCE OF ANY CONFLICT.

07:05:42 THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI.

07:05:43 THANK YOU, MS. DOUCETTE.

07:05:47 I WILL RECUSE MYSELF AND FILE THE APPROPRIATE PAPERWORK NEXT

07:05:50 WEEK, AND YOU ALL HAVE A GOOD EVENING.

07:05:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, I KNOW THERE'S A SITUATION

07:05:57 GOING ON.

07:05:59 I WANT YOU TO GET WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY, MR. MICHELINI

07:06:03 COMES BEFORE US A LOT, AND I WANT A LEGAL OPINION.

07:06:06 I DON'T WANT TO BE MISSING OUT ON COUNCIL SO I WANT TO GET

07:06:12 AN OPINION FROM YOU AND THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT SO WE WON'T

07:06:14 CONTINUE TO HAVE THIS WHEN MR. MICHELINI COMES BEFORE US,

07:06:18 THIS COUNCIL.

07:06:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MRS. GRIMES, I'M SURE, AND I WOULD BE VERY

07:06:22 HAPPY TO DISCUSS THAT WITH YOU, PERHAPS, AND THEN WE CAN

07:06:27 HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT.

07:06:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR.




07:06:34 RECOGNIZED, SIR.

07:06:36 >>BILL CARLSON: MR. SHELBY, WHATEVER OUR DECISION IS FOR OR

07:06:40 AGAINST THE APPLICANT, THERE ALWAYS COULD BE LITIGATION TO

07:06:45 ARGUE THAT PEOPLE ARE BIASED.

07:06:51 IN A SITUATION WHERE -- I HAVE NOTHING, BUT IN A SITUATION

07:06:57 WHERE SOMEONE FILES A LAWSUIT AGAINST ONE OF OUR COLLEAGUES,

07:07:01 IS THERE ANY CASE STUDY THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY IMPLY THAT

07:07:08 ANY CASE LAW THAT WOULD IMPLY THAT THAT CASTS SOME KIND OF

07:07:13 CLOUD OVER THE ENTIRE BODY, WHAT I WOULD LIKE NOT TO HAPPEN

07:07:16 IS IF WE VOTE FOR OR AGAINST SOMETHING THAT LATER ON THAT

07:07:20 THE ENTIRE COUNCIL WAS BIASED BY THE -- BY A PARTICULAR

07:07:25 LAWSUIT AGAINST ONE OF OUR COLLEAGUES.

07:07:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITHOUT ADDRESSING YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTION

07:07:33 GENERALLY, I THINK WITH REGARD TO THIS APPLICATION HERE

07:07:36 TONIGHT, I THINK IT'S INCUMBENT UPON ANY COUNCILMEMBER OR

07:07:41 ANY HEARING AT ANY TIME IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO BE FAIR AND

07:07:47 IMPARTIAL, YOU MAY CHOOSE TO ABSTAIN FROM THAT PURSUANT TO

07:07:51 FLORIDA STATUTE.

07:07:52 SO THE QUESTION WOULD THEN BE, BARRING ANYBODY ABLE TO -- OR

07:08:00 WANTING TO STATE TONIGHT THAT THEY ARE UNABLE TO BE FAIR AND

07:08:03 IMPARTIAL, THE PRESUMPTION IS THAT YOU CAN BE AND YOU WILL

07:08:06 GO FORWARD WITH THIS HEARING.

07:08:07 SO IF THE APPLICANT --

07:08:09 >>BILL CARLSON: MY QUESTION IS NOT ABOUT INDIVIDUAL -- I

07:08:13 DON'T THINK ANY OF US WOULD BE SITTING HERE IF WE THOUGHT WE




07:08:16 WOULD BE BIASED, BUT THE QUESTION IS SOMEONE FOR OR AGAINST

07:08:19 THAT PROJECT COULD COME AFTER THE FACT AND SAY THAT THERE

07:08:24 WAS SOME KIND OF CLOUD OVER THE ENTIRE BODY BECAUSE OF A

07:08:28 PARTICULAR SITUATION.

07:08:28 SO ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY CASE LAW OR SHOULD WE LOOK UP ANY

07:08:32 CASE LAW?

07:08:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE TO DISCUSS

07:08:36 THAT NOW AT THIS TIME.

07:08:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, AND MR. CARLSON'S QUESTION AS

07:08:45 WELL AND ALSO PERTAINING TO MR. DINGFELDER, WITH MR.

07:08:49 MICHELINI'S CASE.

07:08:51 SO WE GET SOME ANSWERS ON THAT, SIR.

07:08:53 LET'S PROCEED.

07:08:57 STAFF FOR ITEM NUMBER 11.

07:08:58 >>ANNIE BARNES: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.

07:09:02 ITEM NUMBER 11 IS REZ 20-99.

07:09:05 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 202 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE.

07:09:09 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL

07:09:13 MULTIFAMILY TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF

07:09:16 MEDICAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.

07:09:19 I WILL TURN OVER THE PRESENTATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND

07:09:21 AFTER THEIR PRESENTATION I WILL CONCLUDE MINE.

07:09:24 >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION.

07:09:29 REZ 20-99 IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT WITHIN

07:09:33 THE WEST TAMPA VILLAGE IN ARMORY GARDENS NEIGHBORHOOD.




07:09:42 IT'S LOCATED IN LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE, AND THE CLOSEST

07:09:47 PARK IS APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

07:09:54 HERE IS THE AERIAL IN PURPLE TO THE NORTH OF KENNEDY

07:09:57 BOULEVARD, AT THE CORNER OF ARMENIA AVENUE AND I POINTED OUT

07:10:04 SOME OF THE OFFICES ALREADY IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, EAST OF

07:10:07 THE SITE, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES.

07:10:13 THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 20.

07:10:17 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH IS URBAN

07:10:21 MIXED USE [~AUDIO DISTORTION~], THE PURPLE COLOR IS WEST

07:10:27 KENNEDY BOULEVARD.

07:10:28 SO RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE DESIGNATION THAT ALLOWS

07:10:31 LIMITED -- SERVING COMMERCIAL USES, CONSISTENT WITH THE

07:10:35 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

07:10:39 THE ZONING IS ALREADY RESIDENTIAL AND MULTIFAMILY 16.

07:10:43 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE SITE TO MAKE SURE

07:10:46 IT WAS QUINT THAT COMMERCIAL CRITERIA. WE HAVE DETERMINED

07:10:50 THAT IT DOES MEET THE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION FOR

07:10:53 COMMERCIAL USES BECAUSE THE SUBJECT SITE IS ADJACENT TO

07:10:56 ARTERIAL ROADWAY, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO NOT INTRUDE UPON THE

07:11:03 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE

07:11:06 SITE.

07:11:08 THE PORTION OF NORTH ARMENIA AND SEVERAL OFFICE USES BACK

07:11:12 HERE, AND TRANSITIONS TO A MIXTURE OF OFFICE USES.

07:11:18 AND DETERMINED THAT THIS PROPOSED OFFICE USE WOULD BE

07:11:22 COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND IN SCALE WITH




07:11:26 THE SURROUNDING AREA.

07:11:28 I WOULD ALSO LOOK AT THE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 4,411

07:11:35 SQUARE FEET MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING, AND THAT IS IN FLOOR

07:11:40 AREA RATIO OF 0.5 THAT'S ALLOWABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL

07:11:46 DESIGNATION.

07:11:47 I WILL TURN IT OVER TO ANNIE.

07:11:50 I'M AVAILABLE IF ANY QUESTIONS SHALL.

07:11:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE?

07:11:55 MS. BARNES?

07:11:56 >>ANNIE BARNES: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.

07:11:58 I'LL SHARE MY SCREEN.

07:12:06 OH, NO.

07:12:10 ALL RIGHTY.

07:12:11 AGAIN, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE 202 NORTH

07:12:15 ARMENIA AVENUE FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PLANNED

07:12:19 DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL AND BUSINESS

07:12:22 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES.

07:12:25 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOUR WAIVERS.

07:12:29 THE FIRST WAIVER IS REQUESTED THE BACKUP WIDTH OF 60 TO --

07:12:36 THE SECOND WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 8-FOOT LANDSCAPE

07:12:40 BUFFER TO 5 FEET EAST OF THE PROPERTY.

07:12:41 THE THIRD WAIVER REQUESTED IS TO REDUCE 15 FOOT BUFFER AND

07:12:45 6-FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE WEST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE

07:12:49 TO 5 FEET AND A 6-FOOT MASONRY WALL, THE FOURTH WAIVER

07:12:54 REQUESTED IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 25 PARKING




07:12:57 SPACES TO 18 SPACES, A 20% REDUCTION.

07:13:03 28% REDUCTION.

07:13:04 THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 13 AND LOT 14

07:13:09 BLOCK 6 OF REVISED MAP SUBDIVISION PLATTED IN 1912 AS SHOWN

07:13:15 HERE.

07:13:17 THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT SITE, APPROXIMATELY .2 ACRES

07:13:22 IN SIZE.

07:13:24 THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT WITH VEHICULAR

07:13:28 ACCESS PROVIDED OFF OF NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE.

07:13:34 THESE ARE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

07:13:39 SHOWN HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP AND SURROUNDING ZONING.

07:13:42 THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.

07:13:46 PROPERTIES NORTH AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE ZONED

07:13:49 RM-16 AND RESIDENTIAL USES, PROPERTY DIRECTLY EAST AND SOUTH

07:13:53 OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE CG COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES.

07:13:59 HERE IS THE CURRENT PICTURE OF THE CURRENT BUILDING ON THE

07:14:02 SUBJECT SITE.

07:14:05 SHOWN HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY EAST AND

07:14:08 ACROSS NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE.

07:14:13 HERE IS PROPERTY LOCATED DIRECTLY WEST AND ADJACENT TO THE

07:14:19 SITE.

07:14:23 SHOWN HERE PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH.

07:14:24 SUBJECT SITE AND ACROSS WEST NORTH A STREET.

07:14:30 AND THIS IS A PICTURE FURTHER ALONG WEST NORTH A STREET.

07:14:36 PROPERTY SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT SITE ARE DEVELOPED WITH




07:14:38 RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES.

07:14:39 THE PROPOSED PROJECT FOR MEDICAL AND BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL

07:14:43 OFFICE USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

07:14:46 PATTERN.

07:14:47 THE REQUESTED WAIVERS CREATE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE

07:14:51 IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:14:52 THEREFORE, STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE

07:14:56 OVERALL REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA LAND

07:14:58 DEVELOPMENT CODE.

07:15:01 I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

07:15:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. BARNES?

07:15:05 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT A QUESTION.

07:15:09 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

07:15:09 JUST FOR MY MEMORY S.THAT CLOSE TO THE TD BANK?

07:15:17 OH, THAT'S HOWARD.

07:15:18 ALL RIGHT.

07:15:18 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:15:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

07:15:21 NO QUESTIONS FOR MS. BARNES?

07:15:23 ALL RIGHT.

07:15:23 SEEING NONE, THE APPLICANT.

07:15:26 >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.

07:15:29 STEVE MICHELINI.

07:15:31 YOU MAY, THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH MUCH THIS AREA,

07:15:33 KNOW THAT THIS WAS DR. VALENTI'S MEDICAL OFFICE.




07:15:37 WAS ZONED RM-16, WHICH WAS AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING USE.

07:15:42 IT WAS BUILT IN 1965, AND I JUST WANT TO GONE THROUGH A

07:15:47 COUPLE OF THE PICTURES.

07:15:49 AND I KNOW THAT AS ANNIE POINTED OUT A COUPLE THINGS ABOUT

07:15:54 BEING INCONSISTENT.

07:15:54 HOWEVER, MY DISCUSSION WITH YOU IS, IF THE MEDICAL OFFICE

07:15:59 WAS INCONSISTENT AND CREATED AN ADVERSE IMPACT, IT'S BEEN

07:16:04 THERE FOR 56 YEARS, AND THAT ADVERSE IMPACT WOULD HAVE BEEN

07:16:08 ESTABLISHED AT LEAST AT THAT POINT, IT WOULD HAVE OCCURRED

07:16:12 MANY YEARS AGO.

07:16:14 THE PROPERTY IS BOARDED ON THE NORTH SIDE BY THESE OAK TREES

07:16:23 AND ANOTHER COMMERCIAL USE, SO WE ARE ASKING FOR REDUCTION

07:16:27 IN THE BUFFER FOR THE MOST PART TO ACCOMMODATE THE TREES AND

07:16:31 THE FACT THAT THE PARKING FOR THE ADJACENT COMMERCIAL USE IS

07:16:37 DIRECTLY ON THE PROPERTY LINE.

07:16:40 SO THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY ADVERSE IMPACT REGARDING THE

07:16:44 BUFFER WAIVER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

07:16:49 THIS IS A VIEW LOOKING SOUTH ON ARMENIA AT NORTH A STREET,

07:16:55 AND EVERY CORNER IS DEVELOPED IN COMMERCIAL OFFICE, THAT YOU

07:17:03 CAN SEE IT HERE, AND ALSO EXTENDS UP AND DOWN ARMENIA WITH

07:17:08 BOTH NEW AND OLDER OFFICES.

07:17:13 THIS IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED

07:17:17 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICE SITE.

07:17:23 THIS IS A VIEW OF THE CURRENT SITE.

07:17:28 AND YOU CAN SEE THE ANGLED PARKING IS THERE, AND IT DIRECTLY




07:17:34 ABUTS THIS COMMERCIAL USE HERE, WHICH WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE

07:17:37 STAFF REPORT AS A RESIDENTIAL USE.

07:17:39 IT'S A COMMERCIAL DESIGN STUDIO.

07:17:45 AND THERE'S A PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING YOU IT'S A DESIGN STUDIO

07:17:49 GOING ALL THE WAY UP ON THE SIDE.

07:17:53 THE OTHER ASPECT OF THIS PROPERTY IS -- I WILL SHOW YOU THIS

07:17:59 OTHER PHOTOGRAPH HERE -- THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IT --

07:18:12 I DON'T SEE IT RIGHT NOW BUT I WILL FIND IT.

07:18:14 THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS A RESIDENCE, BUT THEIR DRIVEWAY

07:18:19 AND THEIR GARAGE SITS RIGHT ON THE PROPERTY LINE.

07:18:21 AND SO THE REDUCTION OF THE REDUCTION OF THE BUFFER ON THE

07:18:26 WEST SIDE WHERE THEY HAVE NO MASONRY WALL NOW THERE, WILL BE

07:18:30 A MASONRY WALL.

07:18:34 AND THIS IS THE -- LET ME GET TO THIS ONE.

07:18:52 ON THE SITE DATA TABLE, WE NOTED THAT THERE WAS A COMMENT IN

07:18:58 THERE THAT THIS WAS GOING TO CREATE AN ADVERSE IMPACT TO

07:19:03 OTHER -- TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:19:05 AND WE DID A STUDY REGARDING THE PARKING THAT WAS PROVIDED

07:19:14 IN THE AREA, AND WE SUBMITTED THIS TO THE CITY.

07:19:23 WE SUBMITTED THIS TO THE CITY IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OUR -- WE

07:19:28 HAD A DESIGN EXCEPTION WE WERE PROPOSING.

07:19:32 REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION.

07:19:35 AND IF YOU LOOK ON THE FAR RIGHT-HAND COLUMN, YOU WILL SEE

07:19:39 THE MEDICAL OFFICES.

07:19:41 THIS IS THE PARKING, THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES




07:19:45 THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING, AND USING ON A CONSTANT BASIS, AND

07:19:50 YOU HAVE THE 2333 WEST CYPRESS, 602 SOUTH HOWARD, 202 NORTH

07:19:55 ARMENIA, WHICH IS THIS LOCATION, AND TAMPA BAY ENDOCARE, 110

07:20:03 ARMENIA, PREMIER CARE COSMETIC SURGERY, 2419, 605 NORTH

07:20:09 HOWARD, AND 501 NORTH HOWARD.

07:20:12 WE SUBMITTED THIS STUDY IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A WAIVER FROM THE

07:20:17 CITY TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE WAIVERS THAT WE WERE ASKING FOR

07:20:22 AND THE REDUCTION OF THE PARKING WOULD NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT

07:20:27 ANYONE IN THIS AREA.

07:20:32 WE NOTIFIED EVERYONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE.

07:20:34 I RECEIVED ONE LETTER.

07:20:36 ACTUALLY, I RECEIVED ONE PHONE CALL ASKING ME ABOUT WHAT WAS

07:20:39 BEING PROPOSED THERE, AND WHEN WE INDICATED IT WAS A

07:20:43 REPLACEMENT, THE FIRST TO INVEST THE EXISTING MEDICAL USE

07:20:49 THAT WAS THERE, AND SECOND, TO IN THE FUTURE BUILD A NEW

07:20:52 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING.

07:20:55 THE BACKUP WAIVER THAT'S BEING REQUESTED IS INTERNAL TO THE

07:20:59 SITE.

07:21:01 IT'S THE HAMMERHEAD.

07:21:11 IF YOU LOOK ON THE SITE PLAN, THE REDUCTION IS THIS AREA

07:21:20 HERE FOR THE CARS TO BACK UP, AND WE HAVE THE STAIRWELL

07:21:25 HERE.

07:21:25 SO THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM TO BACK UP INTERNALLY.

07:21:29 THIS IS ALL COVERED PARKING UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING THAT'S

07:21:32 BEING PROPOSED.




07:21:35 AND YOU CAN SEE ON HERE, ON THIS NORTH SIDE, ALL OF THE OAK

07:21:43 TREES THAT ARE THERE, AND WE ARE PROPOSING THE BUFFER THERE,

07:21:49 THE MASONRY WALL AS WELL AS OVER HERE WHERE THERE CURRENTLY

07:21:52 ISN'T ONE.

07:21:53 AND ON THE FRONT SIDE, WHERE WE ARE REQUESTING THE WAIVER,

07:21:57 WE ALREADY HAVE EXISTING -- IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH,

07:22:08 WE ALREADY HAVE AN EXISTING GREEN SPACE AND BUFFER WAIVER ON

07:22:12 THE FRONT SIDE.

07:22:13 SO THE NEW CONSTRUCTION WILL MIMIC THAT SAME AREA IN THE

07:22:18 SAME KIND OF DIMENSION.

07:22:20 THIS IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHBOUND ONE-WAY PAIRING OF ARMENIA

07:22:28 AVENUE.

07:22:42 AS THE STAFF HAS NOTED, THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS

07:22:44 SUPPORTING THIS.

07:22:46 WE FIND IT CONSISTENT.

07:22:47 I BELIEVE THAT THE CITY STAFF'S OBJECTIONS, AS I SAID, IT'S

07:22:52 AN EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE.

07:22:54 THE IMPACT OF THIS WOULD HAVE OCCURRED BACK 50 SOME ODD

07:22:59 YEARS AGO IF THERE WAS GOING TO BE AN ADVERSE IMPACT.

07:23:03 EACH OF THE CORNERS GOING NORTH WHEREVER HERE AND SOUTH ALL

07:23:06 THE WAY TO KENNEDY ARE CHARACTERIZED WITH MEDICAL, BUSINESS

07:23:09 AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, LAW OFFICES, SO WE ARE NOT

07:23:13 INTRODUCING A NEW ELEMENT HERE.

07:23:16 THAT HASN'T ALREADY EXISTED.

07:23:17 THE SETBACKS WE ARE PROPOSING ON THE FRONT WOULD BE FIVE




07:23:22 FEET, THE REAR WOULD BE 9.4 FEET, THE SIDE 5 FEET ON THE

07:23:26 NORTH SIDE, AND 10 FEET ON THE SOUTH SIDE.

07:23:31 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS BEING PROPOSED WOULD BE FIVE REAR,

07:23:36 FIVE SIDE, FIVE SIDE AND SOUTH WOULD BE EIGHT.

07:23:41 THE MEDICAL OFFICE REQUIRES SIX SPACES PER THOUSAND SQUARE

07:23:46 FEET, AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THE WAIVER.

07:23:48 WE ARE PROVIDING 18 TOTAL SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA, 6

07:23:53 IRREGULAR SPACES, 11 COMPACT SPACES.

07:23:56 THIS IS FOR SCHEDULED OUTPATIENT TYPE SURGERY OFFICE FOR A

07:24:01 CARDIOLOGIST.

07:24:02 AND AS I SAID TO YOU THAT WE DID THE STUDY WITH THE OTHER

07:24:06 PROPERTIES, AND THE UTILIZATION, AND WE HAVE SUBMITTED THIS

07:24:10 TO THE CITY ALREADY, AND THIS IS THE CHART WHICH THEY HAVE,

07:24:17 WHICH SHOWS THE UTILIZATION, AND WE BELIEVE THAT THE 18

07:24:21 SPACES WERE WE ARE PROVIDING WILL BE ADEQUATE FOR THIS

07:24:24 PARTICULAR UNIT.

07:24:25 THIS IS A SINGLE DOCTOR, AND HIS WIFE, PRACTITIONER.

07:24:30 THIS IS NOT A MULTI-DOCTOR MEDICAL OFFICE THAT'S BEING

07:24:33 PROPOSED.

07:24:36 WE ARE ON THE EDGE OF THE WEST TAMPA DISTRICT, AND AS SUCH

07:24:41 WILL HAVE TO MEET CERTAIN DESIGN ELEVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR

07:24:45 THE FACADE, AND WE BELIEVE THAT CONSIDERING ALL OF THE

07:24:49 FACTORS INVOLVED THAT WE HAVE MET THE INTENT AND THE

07:24:53 CHARACTER THAT'S NECESSARY FOR THE CODE.

07:24:56 LET ME RUN THROUGH A COUPLE OTHER THINGS, AND WE HAVE TO




07:25:03 MEET; IS THE NATURAL RESOURCES HAS SOME COMMENTS IN HERE

07:25:13 REGARDING TREES THAT THEY THINK SHOULD BE REMOVED, AND THOSE

07:25:16 THAT SHOULD BE PROTECTED.

07:25:19 THE SECTION OF THE CODE THAT WE HAVE TO MEET IS PROMOTE THE

07:25:21 EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE TO THE LAND AND

07:25:25 INFRASTRUCTURE, WITH CONSIDERATION FOR POTENTIAL ADVERSE

07:25:27 IMPACTS TO THE NATURAL ELEMENTS AND SURROUNDING IMPACT

07:25:30 NEIGHBORHOODS.

07:25:30 WE BELIEVE THAT WE ARE NOT MAKING ANY ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE

07:25:34 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, OR THE NATURAL ELEMENTS, WE ARE

07:25:39 TRYING TO PRESERVE THE TREES THAT THERE, AND WE ARE ASKING

07:25:42 FOR SETBACK WAIVERS FOR THE BUFFERS TO ACCOMMODATE THAT.

07:25:48 ALLOW FOR THE INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENT USES AND DENSITIES OF

07:25:51 ONE DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE ALLOWED UNDER

07:25:54 THE GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT.

07:25:56 WE HAVE TO GO TO A PD IN THIS CASE BECAUSE FIRST WE HAVE A

07:26:01 NONCONFORMING MEDICAL OFFICE THAT'S ZONED RM-16, AND SECOND

07:26:05 WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE TREES THAT ARE THERE, AND THE

07:26:09 OFF-SITE CONDITIONS REGARDING THE PARKING THAT IS EXISTING

07:26:13 THAT'S ZERO LOT LINE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

07:26:18 WE ARE PROPOSING THE BUILDING TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE AT 35

07:26:22 FEET AND N HEIGHT WHICH IS LESS THAN WHAT WOULD NORMALLY BE

07:26:25 ALLOWED UNDER CG, IF IT WERE CG.

07:26:29 ENCOURAGE THE FLEXIBLE LAND DEVELOPMENT, REDUCES

07:26:32 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS, CONSERVES ENERGY AND MAXIMIZES THE




07:26:36 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES.

07:26:39 WE ARE LESS THAN A BLOCK AWAY FROM A MAJOR TRANSIT CENTER

07:26:43 AND BUS STOP AT ARMENIA AND KENNEDY, AND WE ARE TRYING TO

07:26:48 PRESERVE THE EXISTING LIVE OAKS THAT ARE EXISTING ON THE

07:26:52 SITE.

07:26:54 PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE IN

07:26:56 LOCATION AND CHARACTER.

07:26:57 AS I SAID THIS HAS BEEN HERE 56 YEARS.

07:27:00 IT'S ONE OF THE FEW CORNERS THAT HAS NOT BEEN REDEVELOPED,

07:27:04 AND ALONG THAT STRETCH OF ARMENIA.

07:27:06 SO WE ARE NOT INTRODUCING ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT PATTERN HERE.

07:27:11 AN EXISTING ONE.

07:27:12 AND WE BELIEVE THAT ANY IMPACT, ADVERSE, THAT WOULD HAVE

07:27:15 BEEN PRESENT THEREIN HAD ALREADY OCCURRED MANY YEARS AGO.

07:27:20 PROMOTE MORE DESIRABLE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENTS.

07:27:24 THE PROPOSED USE IS A MEDICAL BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, AND

07:27:28 WOULD BE ALLOW FOR SEVERAL OTHER TYPES OF USES.

07:27:32 WE BELIEVE THIS IS A LESS INTENSIVE AND MORE COMPATIBLE USE

07:27:36 SINCE IT'S ALREADY EXISTING AND PEOPLE ARE USED TO BEING

07:27:39 GOING TO THIS LOCATION.

07:27:41 ALTHOUGH IT WAS A DENTIST OFFICE AND IS CHANGING TO A

07:27:44 CARDIOLOGIST, THE LOCATION IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OR IN GOOD

07:27:48 LOCATION BETWEEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TAMPA GENERAL, AS THE

07:27:54 TWO MAJOR HOSPITALS WITHIN AN FEW MAILS OF THIS LOCATION.

07:27:57 PROMOTE THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, WILL HAVE BEEN TO MEET




07:28:00 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY, AND WE WILL

07:28:03 MAKE SURE THAT WE DO THAT.

07:28:05 ALSO, IN TERMS OF THE F.A.R. AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY OF

07:28:09 THE SITE, THERE WAS A QUESTION RAISED BY STAFF THAT WE

07:28:12 ACCOMMODATE AND MEET THAT REQUIREMENT, AND WE CLARIFIED THAT

07:28:17 WITH OUR ENGINEER AND OUR SITE PLAN, AND THOSE CORRECTIONS

07:28:20 HAVE BEEN MADE.

07:28:22 IN SUMMARY, WE BELIEVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND

07:28:27 THEIR SUPPORT HAS FOUND IT CORRECTLY THAT THIS IS CONSISTENT

07:28:32 AND SHOULD BE APPROVED, AND THE SECOND PART IS THE STAFF, I

07:28:36 THINK, MISSED SOME OF THE ISSUES REGARDING THIS BEING

07:28:40 EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE, AND OUR SITE CONSTRAINTS THAT WE

07:28:45 WERE TRYING TO ADDRESS.

07:28:46 THE BUFFERS ARE I THINK JUSTIFIED IN CONSIDERATION TO THE

07:28:50 EXISTING TREES, THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH, AND

07:28:54 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST, AND ALL OF THOSE

07:28:57 CONDITIONS WILL BE BETTER IN THE POST CONDITION THAN THEY

07:29:00 ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PLAN.

07:29:02 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.

07:29:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:29:08 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:29:09 ALL RIGHT.

07:29:13 ANY SPEAKERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR?

07:29:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I HAVE A QUESTION.

07:29:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR.




07:29:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: [OFF MICROPHONE] THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:29:35 WE ARE STILL NOT SEEING IT.

07:29:39 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:29:40 COMPARATIVELY SPEAKING, ARE THESE TWO, FOUR, SIX, SEVEN

07:29:43 LOCATIONS RELATIVE TO WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR, WHAT YOU ARE

07:29:48 PETITIONING FOR?

07:29:51 WERE THESE ALL BUILT RECENTLY, AND THESE PARKING

07:29:55 REQUIREMENTS ARE THE SAME AS WHAT THIS LOCATION IS?

07:30:00 I SEE NOW, I SEE THE YEAR BUILT.

07:30:02 SO HOW ARE YOU COMPARING THESE TO THE YEARS THAT THEY WERE

07:30:06 BUILT, THE PARKING SPACES, AND WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR NOW?

07:30:09 >>STEVE MICHELINI: WOMEN, THE MOST RECENT ONE IS 2019,

07:30:14 WHICH WAS 4.12 SPACES THAT THEY WERE PROVIDING PER THOUSAND

07:30:19 SQUARE FEET.

07:30:20 AND WE ARE PROPOSING 4.81, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN THAT.

07:30:27 THE OTHER ONES ARE EXISTING.

07:30:31 OBVIOUSLY THEY WERE OLDER SPACES BUT THEY HAVE BEEN

07:30:33 RENOVATED.

07:30:34 SOME OF THEM CAME IN FOR REZONING, AND I DID CHECK THE

07:30:37 REZONING FOR ANOTHER SITE THAT WAS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY

07:30:41 THAT RECENT LIMIT CAME BEFORE COUNCIL, AND IT WAS VERY

07:30:46 SIMILAR TO THIS.

07:30:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. MICHELINI, THANK YOU.

07:30:51 I WAS JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW YOU ARE COMPARING

07:30:53 SOMETHING THAT WAS BUILT BACK IN 1948 AND 1961 WITH TODAY.




07:30:57 BUT I THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI.

07:30:59 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THE ONE THAT I POINTED OUT IS 2019 IS

07:31:03 THE MOST RECENT ONE AND THAT HAS LESS PARKING PER THOUSAND

07:31:07 SQUARE FEET THAN WE HAVE.

07:31:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

07:31:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:31:14 >> JENNIFER MALONE: ANY QUESTIONS?

07:31:21 I KNOW JONATHAN SCOTT IS ON THE LINE FOR ANY TRANSPORTATION

07:31:24 RELATED QUESTIONS.

07:31:25 FOR THE RECORD, I WANTED TO STATE THAT THE APPLICANT

07:31:29 PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN THE SUBJECT SITE NORTH OF THE

07:31:34 PROPERTY AS MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL.

07:31:36 THAT SITE IS ALSO ZONED RM-16 MULTIFAMILY.

07:31:41 AND THEREFORE REQUIRES THAT BUFFER.

07:31:45 A FORMAL DECISION WOULD NEED TO BE MADE ON BEHALF OF THE

07:31:49 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO DETERMINE IF THE OFFICE USE IS A

07:31:54 LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE ON THAT RM-16 ZONED PROPERTY.

07:32:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M SORRY, I MISSED THAT SECOND PART.

07:32:06 >> NO PROBLEM.

07:32:08 SO THE OFFICE USE WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN AN RM-16

07:32:12 ZONING DISTRICT, SO IN ORDER TO DETERMINE IF IT'S A LEGAL

07:32:15 NONCONFORMING USE TO THE NORTH, FORMAL DECISION WOULD NEED

07:32:20 TO BE MADE FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.

07:32:24 >>STEVE MICHELINI: IF I COULD RESPOND TO THAT, COUNCIL, WE

07:32:28 DON'T OWN THAT PROPERTY.




07:32:29 I WAS ONLY POINTING OUT THAT IT'S A COMMERCIAL DESIGN

07:32:32 STUDIO, AND NORMALLY YOU WOULD HAVE A 15-FOOT BUFFER.

07:32:38 WE ARE PROPOSING A 6-FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THAT SIDE AND A

07:32:43 REDUCTION TO 5 FEET.

07:32:45 AND AS I SHOWED YOU ON THE PHOTOGRAPH, THAT'S A VERY

07:32:48 DIFFICULT BUFFER TO DEAL WITH, BECAUSE OF ALL THOSE OAK

07:32:53 TREES.

07:32:55 AND I THINK I SHOWED YOU THIS PICTURE.

07:32:58 HERE WE GO.

07:33:08 WE HAVE A NUMBER OF MULTI-TRUNK OAK TREES RIGHT THERE.

07:33:14 AND THAT SITS RIGHT ON THE PROPERTY LINE.

07:33:16 AND THE OTHER PROPERTY, IT'S PARKING IS ANGLED AND SITS

07:33:23 RIGHT ON THE PROPERTY LINE COMING FROM THE NORTH SIDE FACING

07:33:26 SOUTH.

07:33:30 SO WE ARE NOT TRYING TO VEST THEIR PROPERTY.

07:33:32 WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING IN THAT REGARD.

07:33:36 BUT WE ARE ASKING FOR THE REDUCTION IN THE BUFFER.

07:33:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA.

07:33:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOW THAT I MENTIONED IT, IF COUNCIL WILL

07:33:46 HELP ME GET MY BEARINGS STRAIGHT, I BELIEVE THAT'S ON FILE

07:33:51 20-99 IS JUST NORTH, IS AN ALLEYWAY, TAMPA GENERAL

07:33:57 OUTPATIENT, I BELIEVE.

07:33:59 AM I CORRECT?

07:33:59 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.

07:34:01 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOW I GOT MY BEARINGS.




07:34:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

07:34:06 ALL RIGHT.

07:34:09 MR. ROSARIO, ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR FOR THIS ITEM?

07:34:16 >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.

07:34:17 THERE'S IN A ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

07:34:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU FOR THE MEMENTOS.

07:34:28 >>THE CLERK: NO ONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

07:34:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE, SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA.

07:34:37 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:34:38 OPPOSED?

07:34:39 ALL RIGHT.

07:34:39 MR. MIRANDA?

07:34:40 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FILE NUMBER 11, REZ 20-99.

07:34:46 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,

07:34:48 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF

07:34:51 202 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND

07:34:54 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING

07:34:57 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD,

07:35:02 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE, MEDICAL BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL,

07:35:06 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

07:35:09 THE WAIVERS, UNDER SECTION 27-139-4, THE PROPOSED

07:35:16 DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IN NEED OF WAIVERS.

07:35:18 THE REQUESTED WAIVERS WOULD NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR

07:35:22 INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED

07:35:26 BY THE WAIVERS UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 27-136,




07:35:32 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PROPOSED

07:35:35 DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER, WITH

07:35:40 THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, PROMOTES USE, PROMOTES IN T

07:35:48 MOST EFFECTIVE AND SUBSTANTIAL USE OF LAND AND

07:35:51 INFRASTRUCTURE.

07:35:52 THE PROPOSED ZONING IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE

07:35:56 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN FOR BOTH A RANGE OF USES IN

07:36:00 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER PURSUANT TO THE LAND USE

07:36:02 POLICY 1.2.8, AND THE PROPOSED REZONING ACHIEVES LAND USE

07:36:09 POLICY 9.3 WHICH ENCOURAGES AREAS ADJACENT OR WITHIN

07:36:13 NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE PLANNED FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USE TO BE

07:36:17 DEVELOPED IN A MANNER THAT IS SENSITIVE AND COMPATIBLE TO

07:36:20 THE AFFECTED NEIGHBORHOOD.

07:36:23 >> SECOND.

07:36:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THERE IS A REVISION SHEET WITH

07:36:27 THIS?

07:36:28 EXCUSE ME.

07:36:29 MR. MICHELINI, IS THERE A REVISION SHEET?

07:36:33 >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR.

07:36:33 WE COMMIT TO MAKING CHANGES BY STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND

07:36:37 SECOND READING.

07:36:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ALONG WITH REVISIONS REQUESTED BY STAFF

07:36:42 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.

07:36:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: STILL SECOND.

07:36:45 >> ROLL CALL.




07:36:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.

07:36:49 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.

07:36:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.

07:36:51 >>LUIS VIERA: (NO AUDIBLE RESPONSE)

07:36:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.

07:36:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.

07:36:55 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH DINGFELDER ABSTAINING.

07:36:58 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 4th

07:37:00 AT 9:30 A.M.

07:37:02 >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCIL.

07:37:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE HAVE COME TO THAT TIME.

07:37:08 MR. VIERA?

07:37:10 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.

07:37:10 JUST ONE, IF I MAY.

07:37:13 WHAT DOES OUR AGENDA LOOK LIKE THAT DAY, MR. SHELBY AND MR.

07:37:16 CHAIR?

07:37:17 I WAS WANTING TO MAKE A MOTION TO GIVE A TAMPA CITY COUNCIL

07:37:20 COMMENDATION TO DR. JASON WILSON, A LOT OF US KNOW IS SUCH A

07:37:24 FINE GENTLEMAN, SUCH A GREAT ADVOCATE FOR SAFETY AND

07:37:29 RESPONSIBILITY WHENEVER IT COMES TO COAST.

07:37:36 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]

07:37:45 >>LUIS VIERA: I MEAN, DO YOU GUYS WANT TO MOVE IT TO A

07:37:47 DIFFERENT DATE, IN OTHER WORDS?

07:37:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I'LL SECOND IT.

07:37:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA.




07:37:54 MR. CITRO SECOND IT.

07:37:56 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:37:57 OPPOSED?

07:37:58 >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

07:38:00 THAT'S IT.

07:38:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO.

07:38:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, SIR.

07:38:03 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

07:38:03 >>BILL CARLSON: YES, JUST ONE QUICKLY.

07:38:07 I MET YESTERDAY WITH THE NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY

07:38:10 ASSOCIATION.

07:38:10 I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL MET WITH THEM YET.

07:38:12 IT'S A GROUP THAT I HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR A WHILE HERE, BUT

07:38:17 EVERY TEN YEARS OR SO, BRAD COMES UP REGARDING MacDILL,

07:38:22 AND IT'S NOT APPARENTLY COME UP RIGHT NOW, BUT EVERY TIME, I

07:38:26 THINK I HAVE BEEN THROUGH THREE CYCLES WITH THE CHAMBER, THE

07:38:29 CHAMBER ALWAYS MOBILIZING FOR IT, BUT THIS ORGANIZATION IS A

07:38:33 SEPARATE ORGANIZATION MADE UP OF FORMER DEFENSE DEPARTMENT

07:38:37 PEOPLE, AND THEY LOOK AT -- THEY STUDY WHAT THAN IS

07:38:40 HAPPENING IN OTHER CITIES AND HOW TO MAINTAIN MacDILL,

07:38:44 AND SO THEY WOULD LIKE TO COME GIVE US A SHORT PRESENTATION,

07:38:49 USUALLY WE SAY UP TO TEN MINUTES, ON WHAT IT WOULD TAKE,

07:38:52 WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO PLAN FOR LONG-TERM REGARDING THE AREA

07:38:56 AROUND MacDILL AND WHAT THE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO DO AS A

07:38:59 WHOLE TO SUPPORT MacDILL TO MAKE SURE IT STAYS STRONG




07:39:01 AND THAT WE SUPPORT THE PEOPLE WHO WORK ON THE BASE.

07:39:05 SO I WOULD PROPOSE, IF YOU ALL ARE OKAY WITH THAT, MAYBE

07:39:09 JANUARY 13th, THEN WE WOULD ASK THEM TO GIVE -- NATIONAL

07:39:14 DEFENSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION GIVE A PRESENTATION UP TO TEN

07:39:18 MINUTES STARTING AT 9:00.

07:39:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

07:39:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO THE MOTION, I WOULD JUST

07:39:32 PERHAPS SUGGEST THERE IS PRESENTLY NO CEREMONIAL OR

07:39:37 PRESENTATIONS TO BE SET FOR JANUARY 13th.

07:39:40 THE QUESTION IS, COULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO HOLD THAT MOTION

07:39:44 FOR THE FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING?

07:39:46 BECAUSE THIS MAY THE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION AT MONDAY'S

07:39:49 SPECIAL CALLED WORKSHOP REGARDING YOUR SCHEDULING FOR THE

07:39:53 COMING YEAR.

07:39:55 SO IF YOU DON'T --

07:39:57 >>BILL CARLSON: WE CAN ALWAYS TALK ON MONDAY ABOUT THE

07:39:59 OTHER SCHEDULES BUT RIGHT NOW THERE'S NOTHING ON --

07:40:02 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT'S GOING

07:40:03 TO BE COUNCIL'S DECISION TO MOVE PRESENTATIONS AND THE LIKE

07:40:07 TO DIFFERENT OPTIONS.

07:40:08 SO RATHER THAN SET IT NOW, WE CAN WAIT, IF YOU WANT TO, AND

07:40:13 COUNCIL CHANGES ITS MIND OR MAKE A DECISION, THEN WE ARE

07:40:16 GOING TO HAVE TO MOVE THAT.

07:40:19 I'M JUST SAYING NOW AS WE MOVE INTO THE COMING YEAR, WE ARE

07:40:21 ONLY A FEW DAYS AWAY --




07:40:24 >>BILL CARLSON: I CAN MOVE TO THE DECEMBER IF YOU WOULD

07:40:25 RATHER DO THAT.

07:40:27 I WAS TRYING TO MOVE IT -- I CAN MOVE TO THE DECEMBER

07:40:30 16th.

07:40:30 I WAS TRYING TO MOVE IT TO JANUARY --

07:40:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I THINK TO GIVE US A LITTLE LATITUDE TO

07:40:39 AFTER MONDAY'S MEETING AND STILL GET IT FOR JANUARY, A

07:40:44 LITTLE LATITUDE.

07:40:44 >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU.

07:40:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, SIR.

07:40:51 AND I DO SEE YOUR POINT, TO GET THEM HERE TO SPEAK.

07:40:57 BUT WE HAVE GOT MONDAY COMING UP AND WE WILL KIND OF KNOW

07:40:59 WHERE WE ARE GOING TO GO AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, AND IF

07:41:03 THAT CHANGES.

07:41:03 SO I SEE WHERE MR. SHELBY IS GOING.

07:41:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, RESPECTFULLY, I JUST POINT

07:41:08 OUT THAT IT LOOKS LIKE DECEMBER 16th, WHICH IS THE LAST

07:41:11 MEETING OF THE YEAR FOR YOU, YOU HAVE NO NIGHT MEETING AND

07:41:14 YOU HAVE A COMMENDATION FOR POLICE OFFICER OF THE MONTH BUT

07:41:17 I BELIEVE THAT'S YOUR ONLY PRESENTATION OR COMMENDATION FOR

07:41:20 DECEMBER.

07:41:21 SO IF THAT'S DOABLE TO COUNCIL.

07:41:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON.

07:41:25 >>BILL CARLSON: YES, I MEAN WE COULD DO IT NEXT WEEK.

07:41:28 I WAS JUST TRYING TO BE NICE AND MOVE TO THE JANUARY.




07:41:31 IF WE CAN DO IT FOR DECEMBER 16th -- THAT WOULD BE

07:41:34 GREAT.

07:41:35 >>ORLANDO GUDES: AND MONDAY WE WILL MAKE OUR

07:41:39 RECOMMENDATIONS.

07:41:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY, BEFORE YOU VOTE, HOW LONG?

07:41:48 >>BILL CARLSON: UP TO TEN MINUTES.

07:41:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. CITRO.

07:41:52 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:41:53 OPPOSED?

07:41:54 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?

07:41:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN.

07:41:58 I HAVE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH SOME PEOPLE DOWNTOWN.

07:42:00 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO REQUEST AN IN-PERSON REPORT

07:42:03 FROM STAFF REGARDING THE POTENTIAL OPTIONS FOR CHANGES TO

07:42:07 OUR PARKING, MINIMUMS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, WITH POTENTIAL

07:42:12 TO OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY.

07:42:17 YOU KNOW, I.E., IF PARKING DOES COME THROUGH FOR OUR

07:42:20 STREETCAR EXTENSION, WITH HOPES WE COULD PROMOTE THAT.

07:42:28 AND I WOULD HOPE, MR. CHAIR, DECEMBER 16th.

07:42:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: COULD I MAKE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO THAT,

07:42:33 SIR? WE HAVE BEEN GETTING A LOT OF CALLS ABOUT PARKING IN

07:42:36 THE DOWNTOWN AREA, IN REFERENCE TO SOME FOLKS CAN RESERVE

07:42:41 SPOTS AND SOME FOLKS CAN'T RESERVE SPOTS.

07:42:44 AND I HAVE HAD SEVERAL CALLS WITH SOME BUSINESSES AND SO

07:42:48 FORTH.




07:42:49 SO IF WE CAN GET A REPORT ON THAT ON THE POLICY ON RESERVED

07:42:56 PARKING SPACES UTILIZED BY CITIZENS OR HOW THEY ARE PAID

07:42:59 FOR, OR WHATEVER.

07:43:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF WE WANT TO PIGGYBACK I AM AMENABLE TO

07:43:09 THAT.

07:43:10 VIK, YOU HAVE YOUR WORK CUT OUT FOR YOU ON THE 16th.

07:43:13 WE NEED TO TAKE A VOTE ON THAT.

07:43:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, MR. CARLSON SECONDED IT.

07:43:17 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:43:19 ANY OPPOSED?

07:43:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.

07:43:23 I DIDN'T MEAN THAT.

07:43:24 I WASN'T OPPOSED.

07:43:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION CARRIED.

07:43:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: TO MY GOOD FRIEND EJ, THANK YOU.

07:43:32 GOOD SEEING YOU AGAIN TODAY.

07:43:34 THAT'S OUR SIGN.

07:43:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST WANT TO SAY A LITTLE SHOUTOUT TO

07:43:39 THE TAMPA BAY RAYS.

07:43:42 YOU KNOW, YOU FALL SHORT A LITTLE BIT, BUT THEN YOU LOOK AT

07:43:45 WHAT THEY HAVE DONE, AND I AM NOT A BASEBALL EXPERT.

07:43:49 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OH, COME ON, YOU?

07:43:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.

07:43:52 [ LAUGHTER ]

07:43:57 I CAN TELL YOU THIS.




07:43:58 AND THE LITTLE KNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE, NO ORGANIZATION IN THE

07:44:01 LAST TEN YEARS, MAYBE EVEN MORE THAN THAT, HAS DONE WHAT

07:44:05 THEY HAVE DONE WITH A PAYROLL THAT THEY HAVE AND HOW THEY

07:44:08 BRING UP YOUNG INDIVIDUALS AND MAKE THEM WHAT THEY ARE.

07:44:16 IT'S NOT THE SALARY BUT THE COHESIVENESS OF A GROUP WORKING

07:44:22 TOGETHER.

07:44:22 WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT ANY BUSINESS, IN BASEBALL, FOOTBALL,

07:44:24 HOCKEY, SOCCER, AND BASKETBALL, THEY ARE ALL BUSINESSES JUST

07:44:27 LIKE ANYTHING ELSE.

07:44:28 I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY TEAM IN ALL OF BASEBALL THAT HAS

07:44:33 ACCOMPLISHED WHAT THEY HAVE, AND I HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE,

07:44:37 WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WITH WHAT THEY HAVE AND HOW THEY MOLD

07:44:41 THE YOUNG PLAYERS WITH THE OTHER PLAYERS, ONE OF THE

07:44:44 STARTERS FOR THE CARDINALS, HE WAS A WAYNE WRIGHT, STILL 39

07:44:48 OR 40 STILL WINNING MORE GAMES THAN HE WAS LOSING.

07:44:52 AND YOU LOOK AT WAYNE WRIGHT, THEIR MENTALITY IS THE SAME,

07:44:57 AND THE BATTERS THAT THEY HAVE BRINGING PEOPLE -- THAT ARE

07:45:03 NOT DISCARDED OR APPROVED OF FOR WHATEVER REASON, AND THE

07:45:08 YOUNG KID THAT STARTED BASEBALL WHEN HE WAS 16, HE'S NOT

07:45:13 EVEN 21, HE'S GOING TO BE AN ANIMAL THE WAY HE DID AND THE

07:45:16 WAY HE RUNS AND THE MENTALITY HE HAS TOWARDS THE GAME, HE'S

07:45:19 A SHORT STOP NOW BUT LET'S SEE WHAT HE DOES.

07:45:22 BUT HE'S A FANTASTIC PLAYER.

07:45:23 AND YOU SEE GUYS NOT BUILT NO BIGGER THAN YOU OR I AND

07:45:29 HITTING 36 HOME RUNS, 39 HOME RUNS, HAD A PITCHER WHO




07:45:33 COULDN'T HIT HIS WEIGHT LIKE ONE TIME AND HE HAD LIKE 30

07:45:37 HOME RUNS.

07:45:37 SO IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT HOME RUNS.

07:45:39 IT'S WORKING TOGETHER.

07:45:41 AND IF YOU WORK TOGETHER AND STAY TOGETHER YOU ARE GOING TO

07:45:43 WIN MORE THAN YOU LOSE.

07:45:44 AND I HAVE TO GIVE A SHOUT TO THE INDIVIDUAL ON THE OTHER

07:45:48 SIDE.

07:45:49 YOU KNOW HOW I AM ABOUT OTHER THINGS AND I AM NOT GOING TO

07:45:51 MENTION THOSE.

07:45:52 BUT THERE'S NO OTHER ORGANIZATION IN BASEBALL THAT HAS DONE

07:45:55 WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WITH THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THEY HAD TO

07:45:57 SPEND.

07:45:58 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE AN EXPERT.

07:46:02 ONE DAY YOU WILL GET A BALL, COACH.

07:46:07 IF YOU CAN'T GET TO THE FINISH --

07:46:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WELL, BASEBALL IS HOW THE BALL BOUNCES.

07:46:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: OH, YEAH.

07:46:16 WELL, WE WISH THE RAYS GOOD LUCK NEXT YEAR, AND THE PAYROLL

07:46:20 THAT THEY HAVE, AND THE PEOPLE, COULD BE A CHAMPIONSHIP

07:46:25 TEAM.

07:46:25 ALL THE WAY TO PRESENTATIONS, SIR.

07:46:28 ANYTHING ELSE?

07:46:30 MR. SHELBY, ANYTHING, SIR?

07:46:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOTHING FOR ME.




07:46:32 THANK YOU.

07:46:34 ONE MORE LAST THING, JUST A REMINDER TO THE COUNCIL THAT WE

07:46:37 HAVE A SPECIAL CALLED WORKSHOP MONDAY MORNING AT 10:00 A.M.

07:46:43 RIGHT HERE TO TALK ABOUT SCHEDULING OF THE AGENDAS.

07:46:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.

07:46:47 MOTION TO FILE BY MR. MIRANDA, SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO.

07:46:50 ALL IN FAVOR?

07:46:51 WE ARE ADJOURNED.

07:46:56 (MEETING ADJOURNED)

07:46:59



DISCLAIMER:

THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.