TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2022
9:00 A.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
09:02:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WELCOME TO TAMPA CITY HALL.
I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER.
IT IS MY PLEASURE THIS MORNING TO INTRODUCE LEE BELL,
PRESIDENT AND CEO OF THE YBOR CITY CHAMBER.
NO STRANGER TO THIS COMMUNITY, HE REPRESENTS THE
BUSINESS LEADERS, THE COMMUNITY LEADERS OF YBOR CITY.
A GENTLEMAN THAT REALLY NEEDS NO INTRODUCTION BECAUSE
HE IS EVERYWHERE, MANY EVENTS INVOLVED IN MANY
DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS.
MR. BELL, IF WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME ON FORWARD AND GO
AHEAD, SIR.
09:03:20 >> DEAR LOVING FATHER, LET ME SAY THANK YOU ON BEHALF
OF ALL WHO ARE GATHERED HERE TODAY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR MANY AND ABUNDANT BLESSINGS.
THANK YOU FOR LIFE ITSELF.
FOR THE PLEASURE OF HEALTH, WE NEED TO FULFILL YOUR
CALLING.
FOR SUSTENANCE AND FOR FRIENDSHIP.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ABILITY TO BE INVOLVED IN USEFUL
WORK AND FOR YOUR HONOR OF BEARING APPROPRIATE
RESPONSIBILITIES.
THANKS, AS WELL, FOR THE FREEDOM TO EMBRACE YOU OR THE
FREEDOM TO REJECT YOU.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LOVING US EVEN SO.
FOR YOUR BOUNDLESS AND GENEROUS NATURE.
EN.
09:03:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AMEN.
PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
[PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]
09:04:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
WE WILL DO THE FIRST ROLL CALL.
09:04:20 >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
09:04:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
09:04:23 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
09:04:24 >>LUIS VIERA:
HERE.
09:04:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
09:04:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
09:04:31 >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
09:04:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. SHELBY, YOU WANT TO GO OVER
NOW OR AFTER?
OKAY.
MY PLEASURE THAT WE GO TO THE SWEARING IN TO THE NEWEST
MEMBER OF TAMPA CITY COUNCIL, COUNCILMEMBER-ELECT
HURTAK WILL SOON TO BE COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
HOW DO YOU WISH TO DO IT?
GO DOWN THERE.
SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES WILL DO THE SWEARING IN.
09:05:04 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES:
I -- STATE YOUR NAME.
09:05:07 >> I, AMANDA LYNN HURTAK, DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I WILL
SUPPORT, UPHOLD, AND DEFEND THE CHARTER AND ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE
STATE OF FLORIDA AND THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THAT I AM A RESIDENT
AND ELECTOR OF THE CITY OF TAMPA AND AM ENTITLED TO
HOLD THE OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER OF THE CITY OF
TAMPA TO WHICH I HAVE BEEN APPOINTED AND
THAT I WILL FAITHFULLY PERFORM THE DUTIES OF SAID
POSITION INTO AND OF WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER.
SO HELP ME GOD.
I, AMANDA LYNN HURTAK, A CITIZEN OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BEING
EMPLOYED BY OR AN OFFICER OF THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA, AND RECIPIENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS AS SUCH EMPLOYEE
OR OFFICER DO HEARBY SOLEMNLY SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I
WILL SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND
OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
09:06:58 >> CONGRATULATIONS.
[APPLAUSE]
09:07:18 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
09:07:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WELCOME TO THE FAMILY.
09:07:20 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
09:07:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE WILL TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS
BECAUSE MEMBERS OF THE -- THE COUNCILMEMBER'S FAMILY
ARE HERE.
FIVE-MINUTE RECESS FOR PHOTOGRAPHS AND WHATNOT, DO THE
NEW ROLL CALL AND START THE MEETING.
WE ARE IN RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES.
09:15:25 >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
09:15:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
09:15:27 >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
09:15:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
09:15:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
09:15:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
09:15:33 >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
09:15:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. SHELBY, BEFORE YOU BEGIN,
USF STUDENT GOVERNMENT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE TOURING CITY
HALL.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE HERE OR WILL BE COMING LATER,
BUT I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEM.
I DON'T SEE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE, BUT GO BULLS.
09:15:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
GO BULLS.
09:15:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
GOOD MORNING, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MARTIN
SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
TODAY IS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022.
WE HERE AT OLD CITY HALL AND THIS IS A REGULAR AGENDA.
THE PUBLIC AND THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA
ARE ABLE TO WATCH AND VIEW THIS ON SPECTRUM,
FRONTIER, AND ON THE INTERNET AT TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN ATTEND HERE IN PERSON IN CITY
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, OR VIRTUALLY
PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING BY USING WHAT IS REFERRED AS
THE STATE OF FLORIDA STATUTES AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA
TECHNOLOGY.
KNOW TO SPEAK REMOTELY DURING PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE
USE OF CMT, PREREGISTRATION IS REQUIRED AND THAT
INFORMATION IS ON THE AGENDA AS WELL AS ON THE NOTICE
OF TODAY'S MEETING.
AND ALSO THAT IS AVAILABLE ON TAMPA.GOV/CITY COUNCIL.
NOW TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN PUBLIC HEARINGS USING
CMT, PREREGISTRATION IS ALSO REQUIRED AND THAT IS
AVAILABLE ON THE CITY COUNCIL'S WEB PAGE,
TAMPA.GOV/CITYCOUNCIL.
A NOTE TO THE PUBLIC TO PARTICIPATE IN QUASI MATTERS
VIA CMT, SMARTPHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE, YOU MUST HAVE
ACCESS TO CMT WITH A TABLET, COMPUTER EQUIPPED WITH A
VIDEO AND MICROPHONE TO BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL
AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, I BELIEVE THAT COUNCIL -- I AM
GOING TO ASK COUNCIL TO WAIVE THE RULES FOR THE
CONTINUATION OF CMT.
09:17:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED?
HOUSEKEEPING.
ITEM NUMBER 1 PER REQUEST OF COUNCILMAN VIERA.
A MOTION TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 21, SIR?
09:17:52 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
WE HAD A MISS TIFFANY DAVIS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT MONTH
AND UNABLE TO MAKE IT BUT IS ON APRIL 21 IF I MAY.
09:18:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA AND
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED.
VERY GOOD.
ITEM NUMBER 47, CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE HERE TO REMOVE
ITEM 47.
09:18:17 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE FROM
THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE PETITIONER REGARDING
THIS ITEM AND IN DISCUSSION WITH THE PETITIONER, WE ARE
ASKING FOR THIS ITEM TO BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
09:18:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION TO REMOVE.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED.
ALL RIGHT, ITEM NUMBER 78.
IF I CAN HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE THIS UP TO BE HEARD
AFTER ADMINISTRATION UPDATE.
09:18:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MOTION.
09:18:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
09:18:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT.
ITEM -- STAFF REPORT 66-79.
PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF WE NEED ANY STAFF PRESENT FOR ANY
OF THESE ITEMS.
ITEM NUMBER 66.
THIS IS 400 -- WELL, $850,000 ITEM.
ACTUALLY, THERE IS A REQUEST TO CONTINUE 66 TO MAY 5,
2022 TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL TIME MOTION FROM
COUNCILMAN CITRO, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
THAT WILL BE CONTINUED MAY 5, 2022.
ITEM 67 IS A $3 MILLION CONTRACT.
BRAD BAIRD SENT A MEMO.
DO WE NEED HIM PRESENT FOR THIS?
09:19:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM SATISFIED.
09:19:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY?
MR. BAIRD, YOU ARE NOT NEEDED FOR 67.
ITEM 68, AN ITEM WITH MR. BAIRD OF $5 MILLION.
DO WE NEED THE GENTLEMAN PRESENT AT THAT TIME FOR THAT?
09:19:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I ASKED A QUESTION OF MR. BAIRD
INCLUDED IN THE PURE PROJECT.
I AM SATISFIED.
09:19:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM 69, $6.2 MILLION.
ALSO MR. BAIRD, ANYBODY HAVE REQUEST TO HAVE HIM
PRESENT.
09:19:59 >>BILL CARLSON:
FOLLOW ON WITH WHAT COUNCILMAN CITRO
AND I ASKED MR. BAIRD IF HE WAS PART OF THE PURE
PROJECT AND HE SAID NO SO I AM SATISFIED.
09:20:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
DON'T NEED MR. BAIRD FOR 69.
ITEM 70, A MEMORANDUM FROM CHIEF BARBARA TRIPP.
A $3 MILLION ITEM.
DO WE NEED CHIEF TRIPP PRESENT FOR 70?
09:20:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I HAVE SPOKEN TO CHIEF TRIPP, I AM
SATISFIED.
09:20:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
09:20:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NUMBER 70, CHIEF TRIPP WILL NOT
NEED TO BE IN PERSON.
ITEM 71 IS A $1.5 MILLION ITEM ALSO PART OF 70, PART
TWO OF TWO.
ANY QUESTIONS?
09:20:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGAIN, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH CHIEF TRIPP.
09:20:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT, NUMBER 72 IS A STAFF
REPORT ON THE VILA BROTHERS PARK WHICH IS MY ITEM.
09:20:48 >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK WE SHOULD -- JUST FOR THE SAKE
OF THE PUBLIC WE SHOULD HAVE --
09:20:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AGREE.
09:20:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I THINK SO WE SHOULD TOO.
I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH MISS MARTHA VILA AND OTHER
IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON.
I HAVE THE REPORT, BUT I WOULD LIKE THE PUBLIC TO
HEARING.
72, MISS OCEA WYNN TO BE PRESENT.
NUMBER 73.
09:21:12 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, FOR 73, WE HAVE A DETAILED
MEMO.
I AM GOING TO MOTION FOR THIS TO RETURN TO US IN 60
DAYS.
FOR TAMPA FIRE STATION 24.
IT NOTES, I GUESS, THE USF PART OF TOWN, 33647 AND
WHATNOT.
I DON'T THINK WE NEED CHIEF TRIPP HERE FOR THIS BUT I
WILL SPEAK ON THIS WHENEVER THE TIME COMES.
09:21:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
JUNE 2 AND JUNE 16.
THOSE ARE REGULAR SESSIONS.
09:21:40 >>LUIS VIERA:
YEAH, THAT IS GREAT.
JUNE 2, IF I MAY.
09:21:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA TO
CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER --
09:21:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, SIR, THANK YOU.
NOT TO CONTINUE BUT TO HAVE IT COME BACK FOR AN UPDATED
REPORT FOR THE TWO STATIONS AND THEIR STATUS.
SO WE WILL DEAL WITH IT TODAY, BUT IT WILL COME BACK
FOR CONTINUED SCRUTINY.
09:21:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WHEN YOU SAY DEAL WITH IT TODAY,
YOU WANT STAFF TO COME ON THAT ITEM TODAY?
09:22:06 >>LUIS VIERA:
WHENEVER THE ITEM COMES UP WE CAN
DISCUSS IT AND I WILL TALK ABOUT MY THOUGHTS BUT I
DON'T NEED CHIEF TRIPP HERE.
09:22:14 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT TO HOLD THE MEMO -- OR
MAKE A MOTION THEN.
09:22:17 >>LUIS VIERA:
I CAN DO IT NOW.
09:22:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA FOR
JUNE 2 UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ALL RIGHT.
ITEM NUMBER 74.
09:22:31 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, SIR -- NO, THAT WAS YOURS,
SORRY.
09:22:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MY MOTION.
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?
09:22:37 >>LUIS VIERA:
I ASSUMED IT WAS MINE.
VIERA, CITRO.
TO RESCHEDULE.
YEAH, I DON'T -- AGAIN, I JUST WANTED SOME INFORMATION
HERE.
THE REPORT IS VERY DETAILED.
I DON'T -- FOR THE SAKE OF THE STAFF, I DON'T NEED THEM
HERE.
WE CAN DISCUSS IT IF ANYBODY NEEDS ANY ANYTHING.
09:22:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE WILL DISCUSS IT WITH STAFF.
ITEM 75, TAMPA FIRE RESCUE.
COUNCILMAN VIERA, YOUR MOTION REGARDING RESPONSE TIMES
--
09:23:06 >>LUIS VIERA:
I AM SORRY, MAY I --
09:23:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I WILL COME BACK TO YOU, IF YOU
WANT.
ITEM NUMBER 76, A MEMO FROM OCEA WYNN, PARKS AND REC.
REPORT ON A YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL.
THAT IS A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEONE PRESENT, SIR?
09:23:23 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
09:23:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM NUMBER 76 WILL HAVE SOMEONE
PRESENT.
ITEM NUMBER 77, THIS IS A MOTION ORIGINALLY FROM
DINGFELDER, SECONDED BY CARLSON.
THIS IS -- THIS IS SPECIFIC POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS INCENTIVES BASED ON THE FLORIDA
MODEL AND RESEARCH.
DO YOU WISH TO HAVE SOMEBODY HERE?
WE DO HAVE A REPORT FROM STEPHEN BENSON.
09:23:49 >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK IT WILL BE WORTH A COUPLE OF
MINUTES, IF THEY ARE AVAILABLE, TO SEE IF ANYTHING WE CAN
DO.
09:23:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
STEPHEN BENSON AVAILABLE FOR 77.
CHIEF OF STAFF AND CEO.
I KNOW THE CHIEF OF STAFF IS HERE.
THE COLLABORATIVE OF THE ADMINISTRATION AND COUNCIL OF
CREATING THE NEXT BUDGET.
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
WAS THE BUDGET ADVISORY COUNCIL GOING TO APPEAR IN
PERSON, SIR?
09:24:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THEY DISCUSSED IT AT THEIR MEETING,
AND THEIR CHAIR JOSEPH JOHNSON WILL BE IN THE CHAMBERS
AND AVAILABLE.
09:24:24 >>BILL CARLSON:
THE PURPOSE OF THIS -- I TALKED TO THE
CFO YESTERDAY, THE PURPOSE OF THE MOTION TO HAVE THE
CFO HEAR FROM US WHAT OUR IDEAS ARE ABOUT HOW THE
PROCESS SHOULD BE HANDLED.
LAST YEAR OR TWO, CHIEF OF STAFF PROPOSED A PROCESS TO
GET FEEDBACK FROM US WHICH IS A LOT BETTER THAN THE WAY
THINGS HAVE BEEN BEFORE BUT YOU MAY HAVE IDEAS HOW IT
CAN BE DONE BETTER.
09:24:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
KEEP AT LEAST CHIEF OF STAFF AND
MR. ROGERO HERE.
AND THE GENTLEMAN FROM THE CITIZENS BOARD.
ALL RIGHT, THAT'S THAT.
79.
TO DISCUSS AN ADDITIONAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO BE
ADDED TO THE CALENDAR TO ADDRESS THE BACKLOG.
THE ORIGINAL MOTION WAS COUNCILMAN VIERA.
I SECONDED IT.
ANYTHING, SIR?
09:25:09 >>LUIS VIERA:
SORRY, LOOKING FOR SOMETHING ON 75.
09:25:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ABOUT ADDING AN ADDITIONAL COUNCIL
MEETING.
OKAY.
AND LAST, MR. SHELBY REGARDING CHARTER REVIEW WORKSHOP,
OF COURSE, YOU ARE HERE.
09:25:23 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, MR. CHAIR.
75 WAS GOING TO BE AN IN-PERSON REPORT FOR CHIEF TRIPP
WHENEVER THAT COMES OUT.
APPEARS THERE IS NO REPORT FOR THAT.
IF MY UNDERSTANDING WAS INCORRECT, I WILL JUST HAVE
ADMINISTRATION FOLKS CONTACT ME IN THE MEANWHILE IF MY
UNDERSTAND SOMETHING INCORRECT.
09:25:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NO ONE -- CHIEF TRIPP NOT HERE FOR
75.
09:25:45 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, FOR THE TIME BEING.
IN OUR BREAK OR WHATEVER I WILL DISCUSS -- I HAD
A MISUNDERSTANDING.
I TYPICALLY TRY TO -- IF STAFF DOESN'T NOT NEED TO BE
HERE I TYPICALLY TRY NOT TO HAVE THEM.
BUT THIS MAY NECESSITATE THAT.
09:26:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
PARTICULAR BE CLEAR.
ARE YOU ASKING CHIEF TRIPP TO BE ON STAND BY FOR THAT?
09:26:10 >>LUIS VIERA:
I WILL STEP OUTSIDE AND SPEAK WITH HER
IN THE MEANWHILE TO SEE IF IT NECESSITATES.
FOR NOW, YES, SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
09:26:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
THAT CONCLUDES THE LIST THAT I HAVE -- YES, MA'AM?
WE HAVE A LETTER FROM ANDREW CARNEGIE REQUESTING THAT
ITEM NUMBER 58 BE CONTINUED TO MAY 5.
09:26:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND THIS IS A 10:30 PUBLIC HEARING.
09:26:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR.
09:26:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE IT UP AT THAT
TIME.
09:26:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MAY 5 AT 10:30 TIME CERTAIN.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE --
09:26:43 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SIR, NO.
WE CAN NOT DO THAT BECAUSE YOU CANNOT CONTINUE IT UNTIL
SOME TIME AFTER 10:30.
09:26:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE WILL LEAVE THAT.
I AM SORRY.
SAME THING FOR ITEM NUMBER 60, A 10:30.
ITEM.
AND NUMBER 62 THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW.
WE WILL DO THAT WHEN WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AT
10:30.
ANYTHING ELSE?
IF NOT, MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
09:27:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SO MOVED.
09:27:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
09:27:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT, CEREMONIAL ACTIVITIES -- NOT CEREMONIAL BUT
NECESSARY.
WE HAVE THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO
UPDATE COUNCIL ON PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
THERE IS A POWERPOINT.
FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION, HE WILL GO TO PUBLIC
COMMENT.
IS FDOT AVAILABLE VIRTUALLY OR IN PERSON?
YES, SIR, MR. VBIDE.
09:27:38 >>VIK BHIDE:
GOOD MORNING, CITY COUNCIL.
FDOT IS AVAILABLE AND SHOULD BE LOGGING IN RIGHT NOW.
WE HAVE CRAIG FOX, PROJECT MANAGER WITH FDOT.
BEFORE CRAIG GETS GOING, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THE TWO
PROJECTS THAT FDOT IS GOING TO PRESENT TODAY AND HOW IT
FITS INTO OUR STRATEGY.
THE FIRST IS TAMPA AND FLORIDA, MULTIMODAL PROJECT.
THIS WAS, OF COURSE, THE RAISE GRANT THAT BOTH FDOT AND
THE CITY WON.
AND FDOT WAS KIND ENOUGH TO SUPPLEMENT FUNDING TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT FUNDING.
THIS PROJECT IS CRITICAL TO SUPPORT OUR STREETCAR
EXTENSION, THE VRT PROJECT THAT BOTH HART AND THE CITY
IS WORKING ON.
TOD PLANS THAT WE ARE WORKING WITH HEART ON TO ENSURE
THAT WE BUNDLE HOUSING AND TRANSIT TOGETHER.
AND THIS IS SOMETHING WE ARE GOING TO DO MORE OF
CITYWIDE.
AND THEN FINALLY THE FOWLER AVENUE PIECE OF THE VRB
PROJECT THAT WILL CONNECT DOWNTOWN TO USF WHICH IS IN
THE CITY AND REGION'S LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN.
SO BOTH OF THESE PROJECTS ARE CRITICAL.
THEY WILL BRING ALL KINDS OF IMPROVEMENTS.
PARTICULARLY OUR COMMITMENT TO LOW TO NO COST ACCESS
FOR TAMPANIANS TO JOBS.
HAVING SAID THAT, I WILL HAND IT OVER TO CRAIG FOX.
CRAIG, TAKE IT AWAY.
09:29:13 >>CRAIG FOX:
THANK YOU, VIK.
AND THANK YOU ALL FOR HAVING ME HERE TODAY.
I JUST NEED THE ABILITY OR GRANTED THE ABILITY TO SHARE
MY SCREEN.
I DON'T THINK I HAVE THAT RIGHT NOW.
IF SOMEBODY CAN GRANT ME THAT ABILITY.
THERE WE GO.
THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT.
CAN EVERYBODY SEE THE SCREEN?
09:29:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
09:29:42 >> EXCELLENT, THANK YOU, CRAIG FOX WITH FLORIDA DOT.
AND WE WILL GET INTO THE UPDATE ON THE TWO PROJECTS.
THE TAMPA STREET FLORIDA AVENUE MULTI MODAL PROJECT.
THE PROJECT LIMITS OF THIS PROJECT FROM FOWLER STREET
ON THE SOUTHERN END TO DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
BOULEVARD ON THE NORTHERN END.
THIS IS GOING TO BE A PROJECT THAT IS GOING TO BE
BROKEN OUT IN PHASED CONSTRUCTION.
SO WE WILL HAVE ONE PORTION GO FIRST AND THE SECOND
PORTION TO THE NORTH GO OVER IT.
BUT THE GENERAL PUBLIC, IT WILL LOOK LIKE THIS WHOLE
PROJECT.
THE WORK TO BE DONE IS IT WILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR
FUTURE TRANSIT LANE.
PROVIDE NEW AND UPGRADED DRAINAGE IN AREAS WHERE TODAY
THERE ARE -- SOME PLACES NO DRAINAGE EXISTS BECAUSE THE
ROAD IS SO OLD.
ROTARY RECONSTRUCTION BRINGING UP TO MODERN STANDARDS.
AND SIDEWALKS AND SPOTS AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT CORRIDOR.
THE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION IS ON THE SCREEN.
AND IT RANGES FROM TEN THREE-FOOT TO 12-FOOT LANES TO
FIVE FOOT TO SEVEN AND A HALF FOOT SIDEWALK IN CERTAIN
AREAS.
NOW WHAT I HAVE SHOWN ON THE SCREEN IS THE PROPOSED
ULTIMATE TYPICAL SECTION THAT INVOLVES A LANE REDUCTION
THAT WILL ADD AN EXCLUSIVE LANE ON NORTH CHANNEL STREET
AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR WIDER SIDEWALKS.
I WANT TO KNOW THIS IS A PROPOSED SECTION.
AS WE KNOW HART IS CURRENTLY GOING AFTER -- SEEKING
ADDITIONAL FUNDING.
ONCE THAT FUNDING IS REALIZED WE WILL BE ADD THE
ELEMENTS.
LIKE VIK MENTIONED, THIS IS PROVIDING A LOT OF THE
GROUNDWORK FOR IMPORTANT DRAINAGE SUBJECTS TO GET AHEAD
OF THE STREETCAR SO WE DON'T COME BACK IN THE FUTURE TO
INTERRUPT THE STREET CAR LINE AND CREATE A SPACE FOR
FUTURE ENHANCED VRT.
AND YOU MAY NOT SEE IT FOR THE GROUNDWORK FOR THE
ULTIMATE TYPICAL SECTION AND THAT IS EASY TO LENT
BECAUSE ADDED CURBS HERE AND THERE IN ORDER TO MAKE
THAT VRT HAPPEN.
NEXT TO TOUCH ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE LEVEL OF SERVICE.
OBJECTIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE WHICH IS A KNOWN CONCERN
WHENEVER WE REDUCE LANES ON A ROADWAY.
WE SHOW NO-BUILD INTERSECTION OF SERVICE IN THE DESIGN
YEAR AND THE NEXT SLIDE, I HAVE THE BUILD CONDITIONS.
THIS IS AN OPTION WITHOUT THE BRT LINES AND WITH THE
LANES.
I HIGHLIGHTED THE INTERSECTIONS THAT CHANGE THE LEVEL
OF BEFORE -- I WILL SWITCH BACK THE REPORTS.
GOES FROM C TO D WHICH IS NOT THAT DRASTIC OF A CHANGE
AND IN FLORIBRASK A ISLAND AND NO-BUILD WITH A D.
AND A LITTLE IMPROVEMENT AND THE REST OF THE CORRIDOR
YOU DON'T SEE REDUCTION IN LOCAL SERVICES.
VERY GOOD THAT WILL HAVE THAT INCREASED TRANSIT WITHOUT
DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS TO THE ROADWAY.
THE DESIGN IS IN PROGRESS AS WE SPEAK.
CONTRACT PROCUREMENT IS SLATED TO BEGIN SUMMER OF 2022.
AND CONSTRUCTION SLATED TO BEGIN IN SPRING OF 2023.
NOW THE NEXT PART I WANT TO MENTION FOWLER AVENUE
MULTIMODAL PROJECT.
THE STUDY GOES FROM THE WEST END OF FLORIDA
TO THE EAST END AT 56TH STREET.
TWO MAJOR COMPONENTS WITHIN THIS PROJECT, THEY ARE
HIGHLIGHTED ON THE SCREEN AS A MEDIAN GUIDEWAY AND
INTERSECTIONS.
ON THE NEXT SLIDE, THE MEDIAN GUIDE.
AND INCREASE THE EFFECTIVELY OF THE ROADWAY BETWEEN
BRUCE B. BOULEVARD.
AND THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LIMITS OF THE STUDY WE ARE
LOOKING TO ADD ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROADWAY WHENEVER
POSSIBLE.
THE STUDY BEGINS THIS SPRING.
WE JUST FINISHED NEGOTIATIONS AND ANTICIPATING
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT VERY SHORTLY.
THE PUBLIC ALTERNATE WORKSHOP THAT WILL OCCUR LATE '22
AND EARLY 2023.
WILL BEGIN AS EARLY AS 2024.
CONSTRUCTION IS 2026.
I DO WANT TO NOTE, AGAIN, THIS IS PRETTY MUCH TIED IN
WITH THE HART STUDY OF ARTERIAL BRT.
SO THE CONSTRUCTION FUNDING MAY BE DEPENDING ON THE
AVAILABILITY PART TO PROVIDE THE OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE FOR THAT ROUTE.
WE WANT TO GET ALL THE GROUNDWORK OUT OF THE WAY AND
STUDY OUT OF THE WAY SO THE DEPARTMENT IS NOT DELAYING
ANY FUTURE TRENDS ALONG THIS CORRIDOR BUT A VERY
EXCITING PROJECT.
I WILL GO TO THE THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR THE MEDIAN
GUIDEWAY PORTION.
BUSINESS EXIT TRANSIT LANE.
ALL THREE OPTIONS, YOU WILL NOTICE WE ARE REDUCING THE
LANE ON FOWLER AVENUE FROM FOUR LANES TO THREE LANES,
GENERAL PURPOSE LANES IN EACH DIRECTION.
THE FIRST OPTION IS THE BUSINESS TRANSIT LANE.
WE HAVE AN EXAMPLE OF THESE ONE IN CONSTRUCTION IN
PINELLAS COUNTY WITH PSTA.
THEY WILL OPEN LATER THIS SUMMER AND AN EXAMPLE FOLKS
CAN LOOK AT FOR THE TRANSIT LANE.
THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE IS A FRONTAGE ROAD SYSTEM SHOWN
ON THE SCREEN AND THIRD ONE IS THE MEDIAN TRANSIT WAY.
WE ARE DEFINITELY EXCITED FOR THIS PROJECT.
WE LOOK TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC CLOSER
TO THE END OF THE YEAR TO GET MORE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
AND GO IN AND SELECT THE TRANSIT ALTERNATIVE.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR YOUR TIME THIS
MORNING AND REMIND EVERYBODY THAT SAFETY DOESN'T HAPPEN
BY ACCIDENT.
AND NOW LET'S OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU.
09:35:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WONDERFUL PRESENTATION ON SOME OF OUR BUSIEST
CORRIDORS, TAMPA STREET, FLORIDA AVENUE, THEY WERE NOT
THOSE ONE-WAY STREETS.
60 YEARS AGO WHEN THE TRAFFIC PATTERN CHANGED THROUGH
THE HEIGHTS AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AND TAMPA HEIGHTS.
AND GOOD TO SEE IT IS GOING BACK TO A PEDESTRIAN FOCUS
INSTEAD OF JUST MOVING CARS ON THE ROAD.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE NUMBERS ON TAMPA STREET, YOU KNOW,
THEY ARE NEVER NEAR CAPACITY.
THEY ARE NEVER -- I MEAN IT'S MY -- I DON'T USE THE
INTERSTATE.
I GET DOWNTOWN, TAMPA STREET.
CITY HALL IN 12 MINUTES OR LESS, BUT ALSO WE HAVE
PEOPLE WHO BIKE GOING DOWN TAMPA STREET COMING INTO
DOWNTOWN FROM THE HEIGHTS AND REVERSE DIRECTION OF
FLORIDA AVENUE AND IT IS VERY, VERY DANGEROUS.
THOSE ARE NECESSARY.
FOWLER AVENUE, ALSO BUSCH BOULEVARD, ANOTHER BUSY, BUSY
ROAD.
COUNCILMAN VIERA HAS WORKED VERY, VERY HARD TO MAKE
SURE THAT THOSE ROADS CHANGE WHERE THEY ARE SAFER.
WE HAVE ADOPTED VISION ZERO.
WE EMBRACE THOSE POLICIES, BUT WE HAVE TO IMPLEMENT THE
RIGHT LAN TO ENFORCE THOSE.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
09:36:41 >>BILL CARLSON:
I HAVE SAID THIS MANY TIMES BUT FOWLER
AVENUE AND BUSCH BOULEVARD ARE TAMPA'S GATEWAY TO THE
WORLD.
MOST OF THE CEOS I MET IN LATIN AMERICA AND OTHER
PLACES WHO HAVE BEEN TO TAMPA MOSTLY ONLY HAVE BEEN TO
BUSCH GARDENS AND STAY IN ORLANDO, STAY ON THE BEACH
AND COME TO BUSCH GARDENS.
THEIR IMPRESSION OF COMPANY IS FOWLER AVENUE AND BUSCH
BOULEVARD.
PLANS BACK TO LINDA SAUL-SENA TO TRY TO BEAUTIFY THOSE
ROADS.
GLAD YOU ARE WORKING ON THE PLANS YOU SHOWED FOR FOWLER
AVENUE.
SOME PLAN TO BEAUTIFY IT OR THE CITY IS PARTNERING WITH
D.O.T. TO BEAUTIFY THAT AND MAKE IT MORE OF A GATEWAY
TO THE WORLD.
THE IDEA IS IF WE PUT ON A GOOD IMPRESSION, THEY WILL
WANT TO MOVE HERE, INVEST HERE AND SET UP THEIR
OVERSEAS OPERATION IN.
THANK YOU.
09:37:33 >> YES, AS FAR AS BEAUTIFICATION AND AESTHETICS GO, IN
THE STUDY, NOT SOMETHING -- WE IDENTIFIED LANDSCAPE
OPPORTUNITIES, BUT IT IS JUST BETTER FOR THOSE WHO BE
HANDLED DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS BUT WE ARE ENGAGING
-- WE ARE GOING TO BE ENGAGING IN ROBUST PUBLIC
ENGAGEMENT TO GET INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY FOR
POTENTIAL AESTHETICS.
THE STUDY ITSELF, NOT A PART OF IT BECAUSE BETTER TO
HANDLE IT IN DESIGN AND MORE INFORMATION OF THE
DIMENSIONS OF THE ROAD AND WHERE YOU CAN FIT CERTAIN
AESTHETICS.
09:38:02 >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
09:38:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYONE ELSE?
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
09:38:05 >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ONE THING I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION
THINK THAT REALLY LIKE IS, IT HAS A DIALOGUE ON A LOT
OF STREETS IN THE CITY OF TAMPA THAT WERE -- THAT WERE
VERY UNSAFE.
BUT NOT ALWAYS IN THE NEWS.
LET'S JUST CALL A FACT A FACT.
WHICH IS A LOT OF TIMES TRAGEDY THAT HAPPENS ON
HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE, ON REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD,
JR., ON BUSCH, ON FLORIDA, NEBRASKA AND FOWLER AND DO
NOT MAKE THE NEWS FOR ONE REASON OR THE OTHER BUT THEY
GOT TO MAKE OUR COUNCIL.
THEY GOT TO MAKE OUR CITY.
THEY GOT TO MAKE FDOT BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE WE HAVE THE
MOST TRAGEDIES.
ALL OF THE PARTS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA HAVE TO BE
PROTECTED 110% BUT WE HAVE TO FOCUS ON AREAS WHERE WE
HAVE THESE SIGNIFICANT HUMAN TRAGEDIES THAT JUST SEEM
TO HAPPEN AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
IF YOU GOOGLE WHAT ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS STREETS IN
TAMPA, THESE ARE GOING TO COME UP.
HILLSBOROUGH, MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., BUSCH, NEBRASKA,
FOWLER, ETC.
WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON THAT.
I WILL PROBABLY MAKE A MOTION AT THE END FOR SOMETHING
OF THIS NATURE TO COME BACK MAYBE IN A WORKSHOP IN
THREE TO FOUR MONTHS ON SOME OF THESE ROADS BECAUSE WE
HAVE TO CONTINUE TO UTILIZE EVERYTHING THAT WE CAN.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING WE CAN DO, I THINK, IS WE
OBVIOUSLY HAVE FDOT AND STATE DOLLARS THAT SAID WE CAN
UTILIZE AND HOPEFULLY EFFECTIVELY IN A SMART WAY THAT
IS CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMMUNITY THAT IS MAKING SURE
THAT WE CAN USE REVENUE THAT COMES FROM THE WILL OF THE
PEOPLE.
YOU KNOW YESTERDAY, THERE WAS A -- A DISCUSSION HELD IN
COUNTY COMMISSION ON A SALES TAX.
AND I -- AND I WILL SAY IT -- I SAID IT IN '16 WHEN I
RAN AND I SAID IT IN '18 WHEN WE VOTED FOR
TRANSPORTATION.
'19 WHEN I RAN AGAIN AND I WILL SAY IT AGAIN.
WE NEED ADDITIONAL REVENUE TO MAKE TAMPA AND
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SAFE AND TO BE ABLE TO CONNECT
PEOPLE BETTER AND BRING US TO THE 21ST CENTURY.
REALLY TO BRING US TO THE 20TH CENTURY, IF YOU ASK ME,
IN SOME WAYS AND THAT IS A REALLY CRITICAL THING.
WITHOUT THAT MONEY, WE COULD CATCH A BREAK FROM
TALLAHASSEE FOR THE REVENUE WE RECOUPED OVER THE LAST
TWO YEARS.
WITHOUT THAT MONEY IN THE FUTURE, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE
MAJOR PROBLEMS.
CONTINUE TO HAVE THESE MAJOR PROBLEMS.
READ ABOUT THESE TRAGEDIES CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.
I WANTED TO PUT MY THOUGHT ON THAT.
THANK YOU, SIR, FOR YOUR PRESENTATION AND FOCUS ON
THESE AREAS.
I REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
09:40:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND THE WONDERFUL PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU, SIR.
YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
09:40:45 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MARTIN -- I HAVE
MY CITY ISSUED CELL PHONE.
TODAY, I WAS NOT ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO A LAPTOP, AND I
WOULD LIKE ACCESS TO SIRE SO MY AIDE DOESN'T HAVE TO
PRINT THE 400 PAGES.
SIRE AND HAVE IT ON THE CELL PHONE.
-- I AM NOT LOOKING AT TEXT MESSAGES -- AM I ALLOWED
TO LOOK AT SIRE ON MY CITY ISSUED CELL PHONE.
09:41:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WOULD SAY YES.
YOU ARE SAYING USE YOUR CITY CELL PHONE TO ACCESS SIRE
AND THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO BE VIEWING DURING THE
COURSE OF THE MEETING.
09:41:23 >>BILL CARLSON:
I AM DOING IT FOR TRANSPARENCY, BUT
MEMBERS OF THE ADMINISTRATION ARE LOOKING TO TRY FIND
THE SMALLEST MISTAKES, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE
PUBLIC KNOWS THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING.
09:41:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SEEING NOTHING ELSE ON ITEM NUMBER 2.
GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
IF YOU ARE HERE IN PERSON, AS YOU APPROACH THE LECTERN,
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
GO AHEAD.
09:41:54 >> GOOD MORNING, STEPHANIE POYNOR.
I'M HERE THIS MORNING.
I WANT TO STAY WELCOME TO COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
GLAD TO SEE YOU ARE HERE.
TUESDAY, I SAT IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM WATCHING MANY
GREAT CITIZENS SPEAK TO WHY THEY WOULD BE THE CANDIDATE
FOR CITY COUNCIL.
AS I WATCHED, I WONDERED, WOULD WE HAVE FOUR VOTES FOR
THE MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE DESPITE THE MAYOR'S
ENDORSEMENT OF ANOTHER.
I WAS ALSO CURIOUS ABOUT THE RETALIATION OF THE VOTE.
WELL, THAT DIDN'T TAKE BUT A DAY.
FOR THE RECORD, I MAKE NO MONEY, ZIP, NADA FOR COMING
HERE, FOR WORKING FOR THE CITIZENS.
AT ONE TIME, I CONSIDERED RUNNING FOR OFFICE.
AND IN THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, IT HAS SHOWN ME THERE
IS NOT A CHANCE OF THAT EVER HAPPENING, BECAUSE FOLKS
WHO SIT UP THERE CONSTANTLY ARE IN JEOPARDY OF MAKING A
VOTE THAT MAKES THEM THE NEXT TARGET.
ALL FOR A WHOPPING $53,000 A YEAR.
NOPE.
THANKS ANYWAY.
I HAVE MET QUITE A FEW GOOD PEOPLE WHO ARE IN
DEVELOPMENT.
AND LOTS OF GOOD LAND USE ATTORNEYS WHO ARE HONORABLE
PEOPLE WHO DO THINGS THE WAY THAT THE ETHIC RULES
STATE.
AND THEN THERE ARE THOSE PEOPLE WHO FEEL LIKE THE RULES
DON'T APPLY TO THEM.
THEY SET THEIR PHONES ON AUTO DELETE TEXT MESSAGES,
ONLY TALK ON PHONES SO THERE ISN'T ANY RECORD OF
CONVERSATIONS.
OR THEY GET OUT OF CARS AND LEAVE CITY FOLKS ALONE WITH
PEOPLE BIDDING ON PROJECTS AND WANT TO BE THE FOURTH
VENDOR ON A PROJECT WHERE THREE VENDORS HAVE ALREADY
BEEN ACCEPTED.
I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THE MAYOR DECIDED YESTERDAY
TO BRING OUT THE TALK ABOUT LOBBYISTS.
I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET CITY STAFF TO LOOK AT THE
LOBBYIST REGISTRATION FOR MONTHS.
LOBBYISTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR REGISTERING.
IT ISN'T THE JOB OF ANY CITY OFFICIALS OR STAFF MEMBERS
TO REGISTER.
SO WHY SPEAK ABOUT THEM AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE
ATTACKING CITY COUNCIL?
FOLLOW THE FLIES.
THANKS, KEELA, I LOVE THE TERM.
I CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING MORE APPROPRIATE ABOUT --
ABOUT STATEMENT ABOUT THE STINK OF WHAT IS GOING ON
DOWN HERE.
I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THE ETHICS COMMITTEE MEETS ON APRIL
12 AT 1:00 ON THE FIFTH FLOOR OR 21ST AT 3 P.M. I AM
EXCITED TO SEE IT.
THANK YOU TO CREATIVE LOAFING AND THE TIMES FOR
REPORTING ACCURATELY YESTERDAY.
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU TO CHANNEL 10 FOR PUBLICIZING COUNCILMAN
CARLSON'S RESPONSE TO THE MAYOR'S PRESS CONFERENCE
WHERE SHE PULLED OUT THE TERM "FAKE NEWS."
CITY COUNCIL IS OUR LEGISLATIVE BODY.
THEY HAVE EIGHT EMPLOYEES INCLUDING MR. SHELBY AND
EIGHT LEGISLATIVE AIDES.
THEY HAVE NO PUBLICIST.
THE CHARTER SAID YOU SHOULD HAVE A BUDGET ANALYST ON
STAFF, YET YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE.
THEY ARE IGNORED BY THE CITY'S PUBLIC AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT UNLESS SOMEONE ACCIDENTALLY GETS IN A
PICTURE WITH THE MAYOR.
WHO DO ALL THESE PEOPLE WORK FOR?
HAVE A GOOD DAY.
09:44:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
09:45:08 >> HI, MY NAME IS CARROLL ANN BENNETT.
IMPOSSIBLE TO COUNT ALL THE TIMES I WENT BEFORE THIS
CITY COUNCIL AND THE PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL.
ALL THE HOURS SPENT WATCHING FROM HOME.
THE BEST CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ARE THE ONES NOT BEHOLDEN
TO ANYONE OR AFRAID OF ANYONE.
THE ONES WHO HAVE A STRONG MORAL COMPASS AND DO WHAT IS
RIGHT EVEN IT IS NOT POLITICALLY BENEFICIAL.
THE BEST ONES HAVE INQUIRING MINDS AND HAVE QUESTIONS
OF THE FOR THE CITIZENS.
THEY DO THEIR HOMEWORK AND LISTEN.
JOHN DINGFELDER WAS THAT KIND OF COUNCILMAN.
MANY MEMBERS OF THIS CITY COUNCIL.
THAT IS WHY THIS CITY COUNCIL IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN
THE LAST CITY COUNCIL.
I AM GLAD YOU HAD THE COURAGE TO ELECT LYNN HURTAK.
I AM CONFIDENT SHE WILL BE INDEPENDENT, COURAGEOUS
AND ALWAYS LISTEN TO HER CONSTITUENTS AND DO WHAT SHE
SINCERELY BELIEVES IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
MANY RESIDENTS HAVE REACHED OUT TO ME OF ALL THE
CURRENT TURMOIL IN THEIR GOVERNMENT.
NEEDLESS TO SAY THEY ARE NOT HAPPY.
THEY WANT EVERYONE TO STOP THE NONSENSE AND GOVERN
COLLABORATIVELY AND LISTEN TO THE REGULAR PEOPLE, NOT
JUST THE DEEP POCKETS.
I AM GOING TO READ TO YOU SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT
CITIZENS HAVE SENT TO ME.
CA, TOM, WHY DON'T YOU SAY THAT YOU SPEAK FOR ALL
OF US NEIGHBORHOOD ADVOCATES AND SUPPORT CITY COUNCIL.
ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO RESIST SKETCHY DEALS AND WE WANT
CITY DOWN CONTINUE TO QUESTION WHEN PEOPLE AREN'T ABOVE
BOARD AND TRANSPARENT WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING.
TAMPA RESIDENTS ARE USED TO HAVING HONEST GOVERNMENT
AND WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO BE HONEST AND ABOVE
REPROACH.
THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF THE
CITY I NEVER SEEN IT HAPPEN BEFORE.
WE NEED TO PRAY FOR BILL AND GUDES, TOO SO THEY DON'T
,
RESIGN.
THAT MAY BE PART OF THEIR STRATEGY TO WEAR THEM DOWN.
KIND OF LIKE THE SLAP LAWSUITS BUT WITH EMOTIONAL
PRESSURE.
THIS IS CERTAINLY NOT WHAT THEY SIGNED UP FOR.
BOY, BILL C. WAS VERY ANGRY IN THIS INTERVIEW.
SICK OF THE LIES.
HE REACHED HIS LIMIT.
SO GLAD HE SPOKE OUT AGAINST THIS.
THEY JUST NEED TO DO THEIR JOBS, AND LET COUNCIL DO
THEIRS.
CHECKS AND BALANCES, PEOPLE, THAT IS WHAT GOVERNMENT IS
SUPPOSED TO BE ALL ABOUT.
BUT THEY DON'T ALL WANT CHECKS AND BALANCE.
THEY WANT IT ALL.
MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY.
THE RULES APPLY TO EVERYONE ELSE BUT NOT TO THEM.
ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU WANT TO SCREAM.
I JUST WANT ALL THIS DIRT TO COME OUT SO THAT
DINGFELDER, CARLSON AND GUDES CAN BE VINDICATED.
POOR BILL, I DON'T WANT HIM GETTING SICK OVER IT.
HE LOOKS VERY EXHAUSTED.
[LAUGHTER]
IT MUST BE VERY DRAINING AND TERRIFYING KNOWING THAT
THEY ARE WATCHING YOUR EVERY MOVE AND ARE OUT TO GET
YOU.
TO SMEAR YOUR GOOD NAME, RUIN YOUR GOOD REPUTATION AND
RUIN YOUR POLITICAL CAREER AND RUIN YOU FINANCIALLY.
THAT IS A TERRIBLE WAY TO HAVE TO LIVE AND DO THE
PUBLIC'S BUSINESS, AND ALL SO UNNECESSARY.
IT'S GOT TO WEAR A PERSON DOWN, WHICH IS WHY I THINK
HE EXPLODED TODAY, NOT TO MENTION THE HIGH HYPOCRISY --
THE HIGH HYPOCRISY THAT REALLY IS BEYOND THE PALE,
THANK YOU.
09:48:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
09:48:20 >> GOOD MORNING, LORAINE PARRINO, A THIRD GENERATION
TAMPA HISPANIC NATIVE.
I HAVE BEEN WATCHING WHAT IS COMING FROM JANE CASTOR'S
OFFICE AND I AM APPALLED.
NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I SEEN TAMPA GOVERNMENT IN SUCH
TURMOIL SINCE SHE BECAME MAYOR.
THIS IS WHAT I OBSERVED SO FAR.
A CITY COUNCILMAN SERVED THE PUBLIC HONORABLY CARRYING
OUT THE WISHES WAS ACCUSED OF A LEGALITY AND THEN HAD A
SCINTILLA SCANDAL ATTACHED TO HIS NAME AND GINA GRIMES
WAS PERFECTLY HAPPY TO COLLECT HER CITY SALARY REFUSING
TO DEFEND HIM AND SO WE TAMPA RESIDENTS LOSE AN
IMPORTANT VOICE ON TAMPA CITY COUNCIL.
WE LEARNED THAT THE CITY HAS COMMISSIONED A 60-PAGE
REPORT AND PAID TWO LAW FIRMS $100,000 OF MY TAXPAYER
MONEY TO ACCUSE ANOTHER CITY COUNCILMAN, WHO IS ALSO
REPRESENTING HIS CONSTITUENTS, OF CREATING A HOSTILE
WORKPLACE BECAUSE HE HAS A POTTY MOUTH.
A POTTY MOUTH DOES NOT DISQUALIFY COUNCILMAN GUDES FROM
SERVING.
WE LEARN THAT THE REPORT IS 300 PAGES AND THE CITY ONLY
RELEASED 60 PAGES TO THE PUBLIC.
WHAT?
LAST WEEK, WE LEARNED THAT THE SAME ATTORNEY THAT SUED
COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER IS REPRESENTING COUNCILMAN GUDES'
ACCUSER.
WHO IS PAYING HIS LEGAL FEES BECAUSE HE DOESN'T COME
CHEAP.
AND THAT THE CITY IS NOT USING MY TAXPAYER MONEY TO
REMOVE ANOTHER CITY COUNCILMAN FROM OFFICE BEFORE NOW
NEVER HAD A SIN TRAIL OF SCANDAL YOU ATTACHED.
HIS ACCUSER WROTE TO THE CITY TELLING THEM TO PLEASE
STOP.
THE HARASSMENT CASE AGAINST COUNCILMAN GUDES.
DID THEY RESPECT HER WISHES?
NO, WHY?
BECAUSE WHAT THE ACCUSER WANTS IS NOT THE POINT.
THE POINT WHAT JANE CASTOR WANTS TO PRESSURE COUNCILMAN
GUDES TO RESIGN AND FAILING THAT, THE CITY HAS THIS
VERY WEAK CASE TO THE GOVERNOR TO SEE IF HE CAN REMOVE
THE THORN IN CASTOR'S SIDE.
DO NOT LET THE GOVERNMENT REMOVE YOU FROM YOUR ELECTED
OFFICE COUNCILMAN GUDES.
YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING THAT WILL DISQUALIFY YOU FROM
OFFICE.
JANE CASTOR HAD TO HAVE HER BFF MARY O'CONNOR AS CHIEF
OF POLICE AND PLACED IN THE CHIEF'S POSITION EVEN
BEFORE SHE WAS CONFIRMED AND RETIRED SIX YEARS BEFORE
AND LET HER POLICE CERTIFICATION LAPSE.
EVEN THOUGH JANE CASTOR HAD ZERO HISPANICS PASSED OVER
REUBEN DELGADO AND SUBJECTED THE PUBLIC FOR THE DOG AND
PONY SHOW WHERE EVERY POLICEMAN AND FIRE FIGHTER.
WHO DIDN'T COME TO ENDORSE, NOT ONE POLICE CHIEF, STATE
ATTORNEY.
I HAVE NOT MENTION THE ROME, HANNA STREET AND PURE.
I CAN'T IMAGINE A WHO HOSTILE CITY COUNCIL THAN WHAT
JANE CASTOR.
I LIKEN IT WITH JURASSIC PARK, SAFETY SHIELDS AROUND
PREDATORS LOOKING TO DESTROY YOU IN ANY WAY.
NOT THE WAY GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.
BEFORE SHE BECAME MAYOR.
WE TAMPA RESIDENTS ARE FED UP.
JANE CASTOR ACCUSED CITY COUNCILMEMBERS THE EVERYTHING
THAT SHE AND HER ATTORNEYS, HOSTILE WORKPLACE
ENVIRONMENT, VIOLATING SUNSHINE LAWS.
THE PERSON WHO NEEDS TO RESIGN IS JANE CASTOR.
SHE IS NOT COMPETENT OR WORTHY TO RUN A BIG CITY LIKE.
09:51:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER.
09:51:44 >> GOOD MORNING.
09:51:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
GOOD MORNING.
09:51:51 >> MY NAME IS KEELA MCCASKILL, LIFE-LONG RESIDENT OF.
CONGRATULATIONS COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE ADMINISTRATION FOR CREATE
THIS FOCUS ON TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
YOU KNOW BASED ON THE RECENT CHAIN OF EVENTS, YOU KNOW,
COMING FROM THIS CITY COUNCIL AND THIS ADMINISTRATION,
I BELIEVE THAT WE FAILED -- FROM THE COMMUNITY'S
PERSPECTIVE, WE FAILED TERRIBLY AT TRANSPARENCY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY.
IN FACT I RECOMMEND THAT, YOU KNOW, WE BELIEVE THAT WE
FAILED, I BELIEVE THE CITY COUNCIL, SOME OF THE MEMBERS
WOULD AGREE THAT WE FAILED.
I WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT HOW CITY COUNCIL OR SOMEBODY
ON THE LEGAL STAFF, SOMEBODY CAN ASSIST US.
MAYBE INVITE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN TAMPA AND
OPEN IT UP SO THEY CAN GIVE US A REPORT CARD OF HOW WE
SCORE AS IT RELATES TO TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
BECAUSE IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY WAS
IMPORTANT, HAVE REMOVE THE GAG ORDER FROM COUNCILMAN
DINGFELDER TO HEAR FROM HIM AND THE ADMINISTRATION.
IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY VERY IMPORTANT, WHY
DID THE PRESS GET THE INFORMATION OF CASTOR'S STATEMENT
BEFORE COUNCILMAN GUDES OR HIS ATTORNEY.
IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS IMPORTANT TO THE
ADMINISTRATION, WHY HAVEN'T ALL THE INFORMATION ABOUT
THE CLOSED INVESTIGATION REGARDING COUNCILMAN GUDES AS
WELL AS THE DOCUMENTS IN THE INVESTIGATION BEEN
RELEASED.
IF TRANSPARENCY WAS IMPORTANT, WHY DID THEY ONLY
RELEASE 60 PAGES AS OPPOSED TO THE 349 WHICH HAS A LOT
OF INFORMATION THERE.
IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY WAS IMPORTANT, HOW
CAN YOU SAY A NEW INVESTIGATION WAS OPEN AFTER THE NEW
INVESTIGATION CAME UP, BUT THE ADMINISTRATION STILL
HAVE NOT RELEASED ALL THE INFORMATION AS IT RELATES TO
THE INVESTIGATION.
IN DO THE DOCUMENTS FROM OVER 300 PAGES RELEASED
CLEARLY HOW TO NOT TO SHARE THE INFORMATION WITH
COUNCILMAN GUDES BUT IT WAS SHARED WITH OTHER
COUNCILMEMBERS IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS
IMPORTANT TO THE ADMINISTRATION.
IF THAT WAS IMPORTANT, THE CLAIMANT'S HEALTH AND WELL
BEING WOULD HAVE BEEN PRESERVED WELL.
IN HER REQUEST TO HAVE A NEW POSITION, SHE SAT IN THAT
SEAT -- IF IT WAS HOSTILE.
IF IT WAS SO HOSTILE.
SHE SAT THERE OVER A YEAR AND A HALF AND WASN'T MOVED
UNTIL IT WAS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES FOR HER
HEALTH AND WELL BEING.
SHE WAS OVERWHELMED IN THE POSITION AND HE WANTED HER
TO GET ANOTHER POSITION.
IF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY WAS SO IMPORTANT,
WHY ALL THESE QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
I REVIEWED THE 349 PAGES.
I REVIEWED THE 60 PAGES AND I BELIEVE IT IS
INTENTIONAL.
TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT THE PRIMARY
CONCERN OF THE ADMINISTRATION.
NOW THIS CAN HAPPEN.
BUT I WOULD LIKE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO COME IN
AND GIVE A REPORT CARD, HOW ARE WE SCORING WHEN IT
RELATES TO TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
THESE COUNCILMEN HAVE A ROLE TO PLAY.
WE VOTED THEM IN AND THEY CAN'T DO THEIR JOB BECAUSE
THEY HAVE TO FIGHT WITH THE ADMINISTRATION.
THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE IN THIS CITY.
THANK YOU.
09:54:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[APPLAUSE]
09:54:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER.
09:54:59 >> HELLO, GOOD MORNING.
I AM SALLYESE LEE OF THE VOLUNTEER MISSIONARY SOCIETY
PENNY FUND.
AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY ALL PRAISES BE TO GOD.
THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA FOR YOUR HELP IN GETTING
MY AIR CONDITIONER FIXED.
90 DAYS WITHOUT AIR.
AND SO I STILL HAD TO CALL YOUR OFFICE BACK AND YOUR
SECRETARY, SHE HELPED ME OUT.
I HAD TO CALL 45 PEOPLE TO CONTACT TO GET THIS JOB
DONE.
AFTER THREE MONTHS.
AND FINALLY, YOU KNOW, I CALL AROUND AND TALK TO
PEOPLE -- I MET SOME PRETTY NICE PEOPLE ON THE PHONE.
AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT WE NO LONGER HAVE
INSPECTORS IN TAMPA THAT INSPECT APARTMENT HOUSES.
AND I WOULD -- I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT WE MUST
NOT FORGET HOMELESSNESS.
WE MUST DECIDE TO TAKE A STAND ON -- THIS IS MY
BIRTHDAY MONTH.
AND I WILL BE GLAD IF YOU ALL WILL DECIDE AND GOD WILL
LET ME SLEEP.
SLEEP IS A LUXURY TO ME BECAUSE WHEN GOD WANTS ME
SOMEWHERE, WAKES ME UP 3:00.
A LITTLE PINCH AND YOU ARE OUT AND SEE THE PUBLIC.
ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO SAY AND WITH SIN AND MALICE AND WE
SHOULD MOVE ON FORWARD, AND WE SHOULD DECIDE ON WHEN
YOU ARE GOING TO SIGN THE RENT FREEZE.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.
AND KEEP THE GOOD WORK UP.
AND DON'T FORGET OF HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING.
PLEASE.
THAT IS WHY YOU ARE THERE.
YOU GOT TO STAND UP FOR US WOMEN WHO ARE LIVING IN THE
STREETS, SLEEPING UNDER A TREE, UNDER THE BORDER,
EVERYWHERE.
WE NEED HOUSING SO OUR KIDS CAN THINK AND FEEL THEY ARE
HUMAN.
THAT IS WHAT I AM IN IT FOR THE KIDS THAT CAN'T HELP
THEMSELVES.
Y'ALL MAKE A DECISION OF RENTING AND HOUSE -- BECAUSE
IT AFFECTS ME TOO.
I AM A SENIOR.
AND I CAN'T AFFORD MY RENT TO GO UP.
SO I PRAY FOR YOU ALL.
AND PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING AND COME UP WITH THE
TRANSPARENCY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
09:57:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
09:57:25 >> JAE PASSMORE.
THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME, CITY COUNCIL.
THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT I WANT TO SAY AND I HAVE
TO MAKE IT CONDENSED.
I HAVE BEEN CALLING FOR THE RACIST MAYOR TO RESIGN
SINCE 2020.
BUT THAT IS NEITHER HERE NOR THERE.
I REALLY THINK -- FIRST OF ALL, CONGRATULATIONS,
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, BUT I THINK THE PROCESS TO PICK AN
APPLICANT AS WE TALK OF TRANSPARENCY WAS NOT
TRANSPARENT.
THE MORNING OF CITY COUNCIL WAS DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT
IF THEY WOULD ASK APPLICANTS QUESTIONS.
THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SOMETHING PLANNED OUT IN ADVANCE.
NUMEROUS PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY SPOKE AND SAID WE
WANTED A PROGRESSIVE BLACK WOMAN.
WHERE WAS -- WHEN WE TALK OF THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE
WHO ARE COMING TO SPEAK.
WHERE WAS THE CONSIDERATION FOR ANY OF THAT.
AND THAT IS NOT TO SAY ANYTHING OF COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK,
BUT WHEN YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE WHEN
CONSIDERING YOUR DECISIONS, YOU ARE NO BETTER THAN THE
MAYOR WHEN YOU ARE DOING THAT.
WHEN WE TALK OF TRANSPARENCY, I FEEL LIKE IF YOU ARE
NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC, THEN THE PUBLIC
NEEDS TO HOLD YOU ON ACCOUNTABLE.
WHEN WE TALK OF INVESTIGATIONS, BILL CARLSON'S FORMER
AIDE SAID HE WAS A VICTIM OF EMOTIONAL AND VERBAL
ABUSE.
WHERE IS THE INVESTIGATION TO BE OPENED UP ON THAT.
I THINK IT IS TIME TO HOLD EACH OTHER ACCOUNTABLE AS
MUCH AS OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS CAN GO ON THE NEWS AND
CALL FOR OTHERS TO RESIGN.
I THINK EVERYONE NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND ASK
YOURSELVES, ARE YOU WHAT IS BEST FOR THE PUBLIC IF YOU
CAN NOT LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC AND LISTEN TO THE NEEDS OF
THE PEOPLE.
I DON'T SEE THAT HAPPENING.
I KNOW A LOT OF YOU GOT TRIGGERED WHEN I SAID Y'ALL
WERE WHITE MEN.
BUT I KNOW I AM NOT HERE TO GIVE YOU A CLASS ON
ETHNICITY, RACE AND NATIONALITY, BUT I WANT TO STATE
FOR THE RECORD, YOU CAN BE WHITE AND HISPANIC IN CASE
YOU WERE CONFUSED.
BUT MY OVERALL THING IS, NOT ONLY DID YOU COMPLETELY
DISREGARD THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, YOU DIDN'T EVEN
REALLY ACTUALLY SEEM TO CARE ABOUT THE APPLICANTS WHO
CAME UP AND SPOKE.
I DID SEE COUNCILMEMBER VIERA -- I FORGET THE
GENTLEMAN'S NAME, BUT HE DID SAY, HEY, MY AIDE WILL GET
IN CONTACT WITH YOU AND SO FORTH.
BUT OVERALL, SPEAKING, IT LOOKS TO THE PUBLIC THAT YOU
ALREADY HAD YOUR MINDS MADE WHO Y'ALL WANTED AND IT
LOOKED LIKE IT WAS THE WOMAN WHO WAS ENDORSED BY OUR
MAYOR.
SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY AND WE TALK OF CITY
COUNCIL BEING AT ODDS WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, THESE
ACTIONS FURTHER ENVELOPE OUR CITY GOVERNMENT TURMOIL.
I HAVE BEEN TO CITIES THAT HAVE 50-PERSON CITY COUNCILS
AND 15-PERSON CITY COUNCILS.
THIS IS A SMALL COUNCIL IN COMPARISON, BUT IT LOOKS
LIKE Y'ALL JUST SHOW UP AND DO WHAT YOU WANT AND NOT
LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE OR EVEN CARE ABOUT THE WILL OF THE
PEOPLE.
AND I HOPE THAT MY WORDS INSPIRE EACH ONE OF YOU IF YOU
LIKE ME OR NOT TO REALLY REFLECT AND CHANGE.
THANK YOU.
10:00:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
10:00:41 >> GOOD MORNING, MENTESNOT.
IT IS A STUPID PROCESS AND STUPID CITY COUNCIL.
THE FACT OF THE MATTER TO CHOOSE SOMEONE -- NO
DISRESPECT TO THE PERSON CHOSEN.
TO CHOOSE SOMEONE, ALL YOU NEEDED TO DO SEE THE PERSON
WITH THE SECOND AMOUNT OF VOTES WHEN THEY RAN, WHEN THE
PEOPLE CHOSE SOMEONE, SEE IF THEY WANTED THE JOB.
THAT PERSON WAS RIGHT HERE, AND SHE DIDN'T GET THE JOB.
SO IT IS A STUPID PROCESS.
ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY A STUPID PROCESS.
THAT IS WHAT IT IS.
A STUPID MAYOR THAT GOT RIGHT OUT THERE SOMEWHERE AND
TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY.
WHAT TRANSPARENCY?
AFTER THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO?
THEN THEY CLAIM TRANSPARENCY AFTER HER NEPHEW GOT SOME
JOB OVER SOME CITY CONTRACT.
WHERE WAS THE TRANSPARENCY IN THAT.
WHERE IS THE TRANSPARENCY A PROJECT -- A $100 MILLION
PROJECT THAT WAS NO PROCESS.
NO AFRICAN CONTRACTORS, NO MINORITY CONTRACTORS, $100
MILLION TO START.
AND CALLING IT EAST TAMPA AND IT IS NOT EVEN EAST
TAMPA.
WHERE IS THE TRANSPARENCY IN THAT?
TRANSPARENCY IS A LITTLE TRICK.
THEY PUT DIRT OUT ON YOU AND THEY COME OUT.
THEY HIDE THEIR HAND.
THEY PUT DIRT ON THE OTHER PERSON LIKE THEY DID
DINGFELDER.
AND COME OUT AND CLAIM TRANSPARENCY.
DINGFELDER WAS SOLID FOR RESIGNING BECAUSE HE IS A GOOD
PERSON.
HE WAS SOLID FOR RESIGNING.
IF WE WANT ORLANDO GUDES TO HANG IN THERE AND OTHER
PEOPLE TO HANG IN THERE.
THIS -- THIS CITY COUNCIL HAS NO RESPECT FROM THAT
MAYOR'S OFFICE AND HAS BEEN THAT WAY FROM THE LAST
MAYOR'S OFFICE.
IF THEY ARE WRESTLING THE MAYOR FOR POWER, THIS IS WHAT
IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
THEY HAVE A SITUATION GOING RIGHT NOW, JESUIT HIGH
SCHOOL.
THEY TALK OF TRANSPARENCY WHERE A AFRICAN KID LANDS IN
THE HOSPITAL AND THE TRANSPARENCY IS, THEY ARE DOING
THE SAME THING THEY DID WITH ORLANDO GUDES.
TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS RELEASED PART OF THE VIDEO,
NOT THE WHOLE VIDEO AND SAID, OH, THE AFRICAN KID
STARTED THE -- THE CONFUSION.
NO RELEASE THE WHOLE VIDEO SO WE CAN SEE WHAT HAPPENED.
IT IS NO TRANSPARENCY GOING ON.
AND THIS IS SOMETHING I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT FOR
OVER THREE DECADES COMING RIGHT BEFORE THE CITY
COUNCIL.
AND WHEN YOU TRY TO TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY.
IT IS SO BAD.
YOU TRY TO TALK OF TRANSPARENCY.
THAT MAN RIGHT THERE.
THEY DON'T LIKE TO CALL YOU NAMES.
THAT MAN WATCHED ME GET JAILTIME FOR SITTING RIGHT
THERE AND STANDING UP AND SPEAK AT THIS PODIUM AND THEY
DIDN'T LIKE WHAT I WAS SAYING.
WHERE IS TRANSPARENCY IN THAT.
I DON'T LIKE TO PERSONALIZE ANYTHING.
MILLIONS -- TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CODE
ENFORCEMENT IN THIS CITY AGAINST ME, TONY DANIEL, FOR
WHAT?
WHAT DO I DO?
WHERE IS THE TRANSPARENCY IN THAT?
NO, THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY.
WHAT THIS CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO DO -- I KNOW IT IS A
TOUGH DAY TO BE FIRST DAY ON THE JOB AND GET IT THIS
WAY.
WHAT THIS CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO DO IS STAND UP AND HAVE
A BALANCE IN GOVERNMENT.
EVERYBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT COMMUNISM AND PUTIN, BUT
WE GOT OUR PUTIN RIGHT HERE.
OUR PUTIN IS CALLED CASTOR.
10:04:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
10:04:07 >> AND SHE IS RIGHT HERE.
10:04:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
10:04:23 >> ONCE AGAIN, MAN, JOE ROBINSON, WEST TAMPA.
Y'ALL GOT ME DOWN HERE MISSING THE MASTER'S, MAN.
I WANT TO GET TO TIGER WOODS.
THE REASONS I CAME DOWN IS I THOUGHT THE COMMUNITY
BENEFIT AGREEMENT WOULD BE ON THE AGENDA TODAY, BUT I
HEAR THAT THE AGENDA WAS FULL.
AND IT HAS BEEN MOVED TO THE 21ST.
BUT, YOU KNOW, I WILL BE BACK ON THE 21ST.
WITH YOU I WAS DOWN HERE TO TALK OF THE CBA; HOWEVER,
I AM DOWN HERE LOOKING AT -- CONGRATULATIONS, FIRST OF
ALL, MISS LYNN HURTAK.
YOU KNOW I HAVE A SLIGHT CONVERSATION WITH YOU.
BUT GETTING BAPTIZED BY FIRE, NOT WATER THIS MORNING.
WELCOME TO THE CLUB.
OKAY.
WELCOME TO THE CLUB.
A BIG CLUB.
IT IS CALLED TRANSPARENCY VERSUS THE INVISIBLE MAN,
SEE.
SO, YOU KNOW, SOME THINGS ARE TRANSPARENT.
SOME THINGS ARE INVISIBLE IN THIS AREA.
AND I SAY THIS.
SWITCHING SUBJECT.
I MET MISS TRAVIS WHO TOOK OVER CAROLE POST'S JOB.
SHE IS GOING TO DO GOOD.
I DIDN'T REALIZE THAT I HAVE KNOWN HER SINCE 2008 THINK
THAT MET HER BACK THEN.
ROB ROSNER HAS CHAIRED THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENT
SINCE I AM THE WEST TAMPA CRA COMMITTEE PERSON WHO IS
FOLLOWING THE ROME YARD COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENT FOR
WEST.
I HAVE THE DOCUMENT.
I HAVE READ IT.
WE ARE GOING TO TRY TO RUN IT BY OUR COMMITTEE BEFORE
YOU BRING IT BACK ON THE 21ST.
WE WILL HAVE AN EMERGENCY MEETING OR SOMETHING.
IT HAS COME OUT.
IT'S FINAL.
AND ALSO ON HANNA, THEY ARE HAVING TODAY AT 3:00
ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO TRY TO GET SOME WORK TO GET OVER
THERE.
3:00 AT REAGAN PARK TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON.
BECAUSE I HEAR A LOT GOING ON, BUT A LOT OF IT IS GOING
TO KEEP MOVING ON.
THINGS WILL KEEP MOVING.
I DON'T CARE WHAT HAPPENS.
AND THERE ARE A LOT OF DISTRACTIONS GOING ON BOTH SIDES
OF THE GRASS, THE FENCE, UP, DOWN, AROUND AND IN THE
TOWN.
THIS LADY MENTIONED THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
THAT IS AN INTERESTING CONVERSATION; HOWEVER, NOTHING
TO REACH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LEVEL YET.
BUT IT IS GETTING REAL CLOSE.
I'M HERE TO SAY THAT -- Y'ALL CAUSED ME TO MISS TIGER
WOODS.
OKAY.
COMING BACK.
FROM MY HURT LEG.
BUT I AM GOING TO SAY WITH THE LAST 30 SECONDS, MR.
CARLSON, IF YOU NEED A BODYGUARD, LET ME KNOW.
YOU MIGHT NEED ONE ONE DAY AT THE RATE WE ARE GOING
AROUND HERE.
I AM GOING TO TELL YOU GUYS, KEEP DOING WHAT YOU ARE
DOING.
KEEP VETTING IT OUT.
Y'ALL KEEP COMMUNICATING BUT LET'S KEEP IT CIVILIZED.
LET'S KEEP IT LEGAL.
AND LET'S DO THE JOB YOU WERE ELECTED AND APPOINTED TO
DO FOR THE PUBLIC.
SO Y'ALL DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO.
JUST REMEMBER, YOU WORK FOR THE PUBLIC.
THAT'S -- I AM GOING TO GO WATCH TIGER WOODS NOW.
Y'ALL HAVE A NICE DAY.
10:07:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT.
WE NOW WILL GO -- NO ONE ELSE IN THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK
FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, WE WILL GO TO THE REGISTERED
SPEAKERS ONLINE.
NUMBER ONE IS MR. MICHAEL RANDOLPH.
10:07:42 >>CLERK:
GOOD MORNING, CHAIR.
MICHAEL, IF YOU ARE ON THE LINE, PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF
AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
10:07:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. RANDOLPH.
10:07:53 >> HELLO, YES, MY NAME IS MICHAEL RANDOLPH.
I AM WITH THE WEST TAMPA CAC.
TO THE LATEST PERSON WHO IS ON BOARD, CONGRATULATIONS,
BUT YOU ARE COMING AT A TIME WHEN THE COUNTRY IS GOING
BACKWARDS.
EVERYTHING THAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG HAS GONE WRONG
IN THIS COUNTRY.
AND A FEMALE TO COME AND STRAIGHTEN IT OUT.
SO THERE IS A CRISIS IN WEST TAMPA AND RESIDENCE OF
BEING DISPLACED BY GENTRIFICATION.
SUPPORTED BY A RECENT PLAN BY THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
COMMISSION THAT SAYS WEST TAMPA AND EAST TAMPA
SPECIFICALLY THE BLACK COMMUNITY, AND THAT'S WHY WE
HAVE A CRISIS IN WEST TAMPA.
I HOPE THE WEST TAMPA CAC, WE TALK OF WHAT A CAC IS.
THEY SAYS IT A PRIVATE NONPROFIT CORPORATION BY A BOARD
OF DIRECTORS CONSISTING OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
COMMUNITY, AND CIVIC LEADERS WHICH HAVE A PRINCIPLE
PURPOSE OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
THEY THINK THAT IT IS WHAT IS CALLED A COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT TO WHICH CDCS CAN GO TO.
AND LET'S TALK OF THE WEST TAMPA CDC.
WE ARE A COMMUNITY-BASED NODE.
IT IS RAN BY DR. MARTHA FISHER IS THE CHAIRPERSON AND
THE AND JOE ROBINSON IS THE VICE-CHAIRPERSON.
WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE INITIATIVE
FOR ECONOMIC, FISCAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALL
TOGETHER.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS ALL ABOUT PEOPLE.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY AND PHYSICAL
ABOUT INFRASTRUCTURE, SPECIFICALLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
THE MOST RECENT PROJECT IS THE ROME PROJECT.
THE PROJECT IS GOING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE WHEN IT
COMES TO RESIDENTS IN WEST.
THE WEST TAMPA ROLE IS TO MOVE FROM THE PERSONNEL AT
THE JOB AND E-COMMERCE OF JOBS PROGRAMS.
WE PRAY THAT THE NEXT FIVE YEARS WILL CREATE 120 NEW
PART-TIME AND FULL-TIME RESIDENTS -- I MEAN FULL-TIME
BUSINESSES THAT WILL BE CONTROLLED BY THE RESIDENTS.
OUT OF THAT, 150 NEW JOBS CREATED BECAUSE OF THESE
BUSINESSES.
$9 MILLION TO $10 MILLION ECONOMIC IMPACT.
SO WHAT -- WHAT IS THE GOAL?
REDUCE -- INCREASE SAFETY, INCREASE JOB CREATION AND
INCREASE GENERATIONAL WEALTH IN THE COMMUNITY.
THE POPULATION AND FOCUS ON YOUTH, THOSE WITH CRIMINAL
RECORDS AND FOR FIXED INCOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS.
THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY.
THIS IS A HARD TIME IN OUR COUNTRY.
WE HAVE TO DO BETTER AND AGAIN TO THE NEWEST MEMBER OF
THE CITY COUNCIL, WE KNOW FEMALES ALWAYS STRAIGHTEN IT
OUT.
STRAIGHTEN IT OUT.
THANK YOU.
10:11:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
NEXT ON THE LIST IS STEPHANIE POYNOR.
SHE WAS HERE AND CARROLL BENNETT AND LOUIE GUADIARE.
10:11:26 >> IF YOU WERE ON THE LINE, PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF AND
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
10:11:38 >> MR. GALDIERI, IF YOU WERE ON THE LINE, PLEASE GO
AHEAD.
10:11:40 >> I WANTED TO MAKE SURE I WAS UNMUTED.
CAN YOU HEAR ME.
10:11:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, THANK YOU.
10:11:46 >> THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS CITY
COUNCIL.
I AM THE PRESIDENT OF THE TOWERS OF CHANNELSIDE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
FIRST OF ALL, WANTS TO THANK YOU FOR BEING GREAT
PARTNER AND WE HAVE BEEN A VERY ACTIVE PARTNER WITH
CITY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS.
WE APPRECIATE THE DISCUSSION TODAY ON ITEM 3 RECOGNIZE
AS THAT PARTNERSHIP AND THE FACT THAT THE CHANNEL
DISTRICT HAS EVOLVED TO BECOME MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL.
WE ALSO APPRECIATE COUNCILMAN VIERA MEETING WITH OUR
RESIDENTS AND HOMEOWNERS TO HEAR FIRSTHAND THE
CHALLENGES WE EXPERIENCE IN THE COMMUNITY, THE PROPOSED
ENDMENT I AM NOT GOING TO BELABOR THE DISCUSSION
BECAUSE I HEAR ALL OF THE CHALLENGES AND DISCUSS THIS
FOR TWO YEARS.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PROHIBITS EXCESSIVE NOISE AS
WELL AS VIBRATION WITHIN A FULLY ENCLOSED STRUCTURE.
TO PROHIBIT THE VAST EXPERIENCE OF THE TOWERS
RESIDENTS, THE VIBRATION FROM THE CURRENT
ESTABLISHMENT.
THESE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 12-154 DO NOT CURRENTLY
APPLY TO THE CHANNEL DISTRICT BECAUSE WE ARE NOT
GOVERNED BY SECTION 114-154.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU ARE GOING TO DISCUSS
THAT TODAY.
AND BRINGING THE CHANNEL DISTRICT WILL REPRESENT GREAT
PROGRESS.
WE VOTE THAT YOU VOTE IN FAVOR OF THAT ORDINANCE AND I
APPRECIATE YOUR TIME THIS MORNING.
10:13:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT WE HAVE JEAN STROHMEYER.
10:13:19 >>CLERK:
NEXT SPEAKER IS JEAN STROHMEYER, IF YOU ARE
ON THE LINE.
UNMUTE AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
10:13:25 >> DO YOU ALL HEAR ME?
10:13:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, MA'AM.
10:13:29 >> GOOD MORNING, CITY COUNCIL AND GOOD MORNING MISS
HURTAK FOR YOUR -- YOUR NEW POSITION.
JUST FOR SOMEBODY ELSE THAT SPOKE THAT SAID SHE WAS
ENDORSED BY THE MAYOR, THAT IS INCORRECT.
THAT IS THE WRONG ONE.
SHE IS NOT ENDORSED BY THE MAYOR, BUT WE DID FEEL SHE
HAD A GOOD NEIGHBORHOOD BACKGROUNDS.
SO I FEEL IT WAS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR THE JOB BECAUSE
YOUR JOB AS THE CITY COUNT IS TO PROTECT YOUR
NEIGHBORHOODS AND LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS WHO VOTED
YOU IN.
I DON'T THINK REPRESENTATIVES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN VOTED
IN, PEOPLE IN THE CITY THAT HAVE NOT BEEN VOTED IN
SHOULD BE RUNNING OUR CITY INCLUDING THE BLOOMBERG
FOUNDATION AND WHATNOT.
THAT WAS A BIG MISTAKE AND THE PEOPLE HOPEFULLY THAT WE
CAN REVERSE THAT SOMEHOW.
LOOK INTO THAT.
ANYWAY, I -- FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN, AND I AM GOING TO
LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT I DO PRAY FOR EVERY ONE OF YOU
EVERY SINGLE DAY 8 P.M. P.M. IF ANYONE WANTS TO JOIN IN
ON PRAYER, 8:00, SET YOUR ALARM TO PRAY FOR OUR CITY,
COUNTY, OUR STATE AS WELL AS OUR COUNTRY.
BECAUSE BOTH -- ALL ARE GOING DOWN IN HELL IN A HANDBAG
BASKET THE WAY I SEE IT UNLESS WE GET TO PRAYING.
TO THE AGENDA, NUMBER 1, IS THE SEXUAL ASSAULT
AWARENESS.
I WAS LOOKING INTO THAT.
THAT IS ALL WELL AND GOOD BUT CAME RIGHT AFTER THAT
MEETING TO LYNCH MR. -- MR. GUDES.
AND IT FELT LIKE -- IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE RECORD, IT
CAME WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF THAT, QUOTE, MEETING BY THE
CITY LEADERS.
JUST SO YOU KNOW.
THAT WAS ALSO -- YOU SEE WHO STARTED THAT.
SO I THINK -- LET'S SEE.
ON THE AGENDA.
YOU HAVE NUMBER 19 IS TALKING ABOUT CHANGE THE ORDER OF
CONTRACTS.
IF YOU CAN CHANGE THE ORDER OF CONTRACTS, YOU COULD
HAVE DONE THAT WITH BLOOMBERG AND THE HANNA PROJECT.
Y'ALL LOOK INTO THAT IF YOU CAN.
NUMBER 25, THERE ARE $2 MILLION BEING PROPOSED FOR
THINGS AND PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU -- YOU HANDLE OUR MONEY
AS IF IT WAS YOUR OWN.
NOT IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED BANK ACCOUNT.
THAT IS WHAT WE ALL -- WE ALL LIVE WITHIN OUR MEANS AND
I SUGGEST THAT YOU GUYS DO THE SAME IF YOU -- FULL LOOK
INTO WHAT IS COMING ON THE AGENDA.
AND LOOK AT IT SMARTLY.
IT IS THE SAME THING WITH GROWTH.
WE WANT OUR CITY TO GROW.
WE DON'T MIND DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
BUT WE WANT SMART GROWTH.
AND THAT GOES TO THE DEVELOPERS IN THE AUDIENCE THERE
TODAY.
AND, YOU KNOW, TALKING OF TRANSPARENCY.
I LISTENED TO A LOT OF THE STATEMENTS.
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH NEEDS TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE
TRANSPARENT AS WELL.
WE NEED TO MAKE THAT FULL CIRCLE, THAT EVERYBODY KIND
OF KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON.
AND, AGAIN, THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, THERE ARE A LOT OF
THINGS GOING ON THERE THAT PEOPLE ARE TELLING ME AND
THAT I SEE THAT IS JUST -- DON'T LOOK GOOD.
WE NEED TO ADDRESS THAT AND WE REALLY NEED TO -- TO
CHANGE THE CODE SO THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS A LITTLE
MORE POWER WHEN IT COMES TO STRUGGLES AGAINST THE
MAYOR.
10:16:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:16:33 >> YES.
OKAY.
HAVE A GOOD DAY.
10:16:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU TOO.
ALL RIGHT, THE TWO OTHER REGISTERED SPEAKERS I HAVE ARE
TYLER HUDSON AND JAMIE MAIER, BUT THEY ARE AVAILABLE IF
THERE ARE QUESTIONS FOR FOUR AND FIVE.
I WILL WAIT THERE.
BUT THE GENTLEMAN IN THE SECOND ROW, I KNOW YOU WANTED
TO SPEAK.
WE APOLOGIZE.
WE.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
STATE YOUR NAME.
10:16:57 >> YES, MY NAME IS LARRY RINDUMECHT.
[INAUDIBLE]
-- I WANT TO CONGRATULATE AND WELCOME OUR NEW CONGRESS
-- COUNCILWOMAN, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
YOU, SPECIFICALLY I AM ADDRESSING THE NOISE ORDINANCE
TODAY.
I LIVE IN TOWER ONE.
I LIVE IN THE O5 TIER, WHICH IS -- SPECIFICALLY UNIT
2205.
THE 04 AND 05 TIERS ARE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE PARK AND REC
GAMING BAR THAT IS CREATING THE NOISE THAT WE ARE
CURRENTLY TOLERATING.
I WAS THE FIRST PERSON TO MOVE IN TO TOWER ONE IN
SEPTEMBER OF 2007.
WHEN IT WAS SOLELY A HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
WITH NO RETAIL.
I WAS THERE WHEN ASIA WAS ESTABLISHED AS A NIGHT CLUB.
AND I WAS THERE WHEN THE GAMING BAR CAME INTO
EXISTENCE, PARK AND REC, IN DECEMBER OF 2019.
YOU MAY RECALL ON MARCH 17, I SPOKE TO THE COUNCIL.
WHAT DID I TALK ABOUT?
I TALKED ABOUT THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF NOISE THAT WAS
PENETRATING OUR BEDROOMS BETWEEN 10 P.M. AND 2 A.M.
YOU GRACIOUSLY LISTENED AND AGREED THAT A NOISE
ORDINANCE SEPARATING THE CHANNEL DISTRICT FROM YBOR
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY THE COUNCIL.
TODAY I'M HERE TO THANK YOU FOR UNDERTAKING THIS NEW
NOISE ORDINANCE WHICH I STRONGLY SUPPORT, AS DO ALL OF
THE TOWER MEMBERS, RESIDENTS, IF YOU WILL, THAT I HAVE
SPOKEN WITH.
I ALSO WANT TO THANK THE CITY ADMINISTRATORS,
SPECIFICALLY NICOLE AND SUSAN, FOR THEIR EFFORTS TO
LISTEN TO THOSE OF US IN THE TOWERS AND TO PRODUCE A
FIRST READING DRAFT ORDINANCE AT THE COUNCIL'S
DIRECTION WHICH YOU ARE CONSIDERING TODAY AND HOPEFULLY
WILL PASS.
WE IN THE TOWERS NEED YOUR CONTINUED UNDERSTANDING AND
SUPPORT TO STOP OR SIGNIFICANTLY CURTAIL THIS
UNACCEPTABLE NOISE IN OUR BEDROOMS IN A RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY.
I LOOK FORWARD TO PARTICIPATING IN THE FUTURE WORKSHOPS
WHICH I UNDERSTAND ARE SCHEDULED.
AND WORK TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING AND
AT CERTAIN TIMES ELIMINATING THE NOISE.
THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
10:19:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT.
THAT -- YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
10:19:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY.
I WANT TO CLARIFY SOMETHING.
I NEVER RESPOND TO PUBLIC COMMENT BUT I WANT TO READ
FROM ITEM NUMBER 1 WHICH STATES TIFFANY DAVIS TO APPEAR
IN AND PROVIDE FIVE-MINUTE PRESENTATION ON SEXUAL
ASSAULT.
ORIGINAL MOTION BY VIERA, CITRO SEPTEMBER 2021, ABOUT
EIGHT MONTHS AGO, IF MY MATH IS CORRECT.
JUST FOR THE RECORD, THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU, SIR.
10:20:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT.
ANY REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
LEGISLATIVE MATTERS?
HEARING NONE.
WE WILL GO ON TO ITEM NUMBER 3.
YES, MA'AM.
GO AHEAD.
10:20:30 >> GOOD MORNING, MR. CHAIR, SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
ITEM NUMBER 3 IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE NOISE ORDINANCE
THAT COUNCIL REQUESTED AT YOUR LAST MEETING THAT WOULD
REMOVE THE CHANNEL DISTRICT FROM SECTION 14-153, THE
LIST OF DISTRICTS IN THAT SECTION WHERE NOISE IS
MEASURED ON A DECIBEL LEVEL STANDARD.
THE EFFECT OF THIS ORDINANCE WOULD BE TO NOW PLACE THE
CHANNEL DISTRICT OR HAVE THE CHANNEL DISTRICT TO THE
PLAINLY AUDIBLE STANDARD FOR NOISE AND THE EFFECTIVE
DATE WILL BE IMMEDIATELY UPON ADOPTION.
IF COUNCIL WILL RECALL THE LAST NOISE ORDINANCE
ENDMENT THAT YOU RECENTLY REPEALED HAD A SIX-MONTH
DELAY, BUT THIS WILL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON
ADOPTION AFTER SECOND READING.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
10:21:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMAN
MEMBERS?
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
10:21:19 >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, SIR.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK ON THIS.
I APPRECIATE THAT.
THIS IS JUST FOR THE CHANNEL BUSINESS STRICT?
10:21:29 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
THAT'S CORRECT.
10:21:31 >>LUIS VIERA:
SAYS YBOR.
10:21:35 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
YBOR, CHANNEL THE THREE
DISTRICTS THAT IS MEASURED ON NOISE DECIBEL.
YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE ARENA.
10:21:41 >>LUIS VIERA:
GREAT.
WANT TO PUBLICLY SAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
POTENTIALLY LOST IN ALL THE CONFUSION AND SHUFFLE ON
THIS ISSUE WAS THE -- THE NEEDS OF -- OF OUR FRIENDS
AND IN CHANNELSIDE FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF.
AND THING DOES IT AND WE CAN DEAL WITH ALL THE OTHER
VERY LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ON THIS FROM BUSINESSES AND
DIFFERENT GROUPS, BUT, AGAIN, LIKE I SAID BEFORE,
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN YBOR CITY AND TAMPA PALMS IS
CHANNELSIDE, RIGHT.
AND I DON'T THINK IT IS EITHER ONE.
SO I THINK THIS WILL YOU BEGIN TO ADDRESS THAT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE APPRECIATE YOU.
10:22:18 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
ONE ITEM OF CLARIFICATION AND
MENTIONED IN PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WORKSHOPS HAVE BEEN
SCHEDULED.
I AM WORKING WITH STAFF TO CREATE A PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
PLAN HAS COUNCIL HAS REQUESTED AND WE WILL BE BRINGING
THAT BACK DOWN TO YOU AT YOUR NEXT MEETING ON APRIL 21.
THOSE ARE TO BE SCHEDULED BUT NOT YET BEEN SCHEDULED.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, ANYTHING, SIR.
10:22:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I WANT TO THANK THE PEOPLE OF
CHANNELSIDE BEING WHO THEY ARE AND STANDING UP FOR
THEIR RIGHTS.
10:22:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYTHING ELSE?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
10:22:46 >>BILL CARLSON:
YEAH, THANK YOU FOR DOING THIS AND
THANKS TO THE FOLKS FROM CHANNEL DISTRICT FOR BEARING
WITH US THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS THEY HAVE BEEN PUSHING
FOR THIS.
THE OTHER THING WE KNOW FROM OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT
WE NEED THIS IN OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY.
STRENGTHEN -- NOT THIS EXACT THING BUT STRENGTHEN THE
NOISE ORDINANCES.
I AM AWARE OF A PRIVATE COMMUNITY GROUP COMING UP TO
STUDY THE -- THE NEWER METHODS OF REGULATING NOISE THAT
WILL BE FRIENDLY TO BUSINESS IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
AND HOPEFULLY SHIELD US FROM LITIGATION.
AS THAT PROCESS GOES FORWARD, I KNOW NICOLE HAS BEEN
HAVING CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM.
AS THAT PROCESS GOES FORWARD, LOOK FORWARD -- MY
MESSAGE FOR ANYONE SUFFERING FROM NOISE ISSUES MULTIPLE
WAYS TO COME UP WITH WAYS TO ADDRESS IT.
10:23:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY ELSE?
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, READ ITEM NUMBER 3.
10:23:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I CERTAINLY WILL, MR. CHAIRMAN,
ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NUMBER 2022-08.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, RELATED TO THE
REGULATION OF NOISE, MAKING REVISIONS TO THE CITY OF
TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 14, ARTICLE III,
NOISE, AMENDING SECTION 14-153, UNREASONABLY EXCESSIVE
NOISE FROM PROPERTY PROHIBITED, YBOR CITY HISTORIC
DISTRICT, CHANNEL DISTRICT AND THE ARENA DISTRICT
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH.
10:24:16 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
10:24:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. SHELBY, DO YOU WANT A ROLL
CALL.
ALL IN FAVOR, INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
ANY OPPOSED.
10:24:27 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
10:24:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 4.
I KNOW WE HAVE TYLER HUDSON ON STANDBY VIRTUALLY.
THIS IS COULD CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR AS IT READS
BY SUBSTITUTING EXHIBIT A.
10:24:49 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
YES, COUNCIL, THIS IS CORRECTION TO EXHIBIT A FROM
ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-21 THAT COUNCIL PASSED ON
FEBRUARY 17.
THE TEXT AMENDMENT -- THIS WAS A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THE AMENDMENT LANGUAGE WAS
ACTUALLY APPROPRIATELY PARAPHRASED IN THE ORDINANCE
ITSELF BUT INCORRECT EXHIBIT WAS ATTACHED TO THE
ORDINANCE AFTER ADOPTION.
IN WOULD SUBSTITUTE THE CORRECT LANGUAGE OF THE TEXT
ENDMENT.
10:25:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
10:25:24 >>BILL CARLSON:
JUST A COMMENT REAL FAST IN MY
INDIVIDUAL BRIEFING I ASKED THAT STAFF -- AND THEY
AGREED, TO INCLUDE THE ORIGINAL SIRE FILINGS WHEN WE DO
THE AMENDMENTS BECAUSE HARD TO GO BACK TO FIND OUT WHAT
IT IS ALL ABOUT IF ALL THAT IS THERE IS THE SUMMARY AND
THEN THE CHANGE.
IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO BE ABLE TO SEE ALL OF THE
BACK-UP FROM THE ORIGINAL ITEMS SO WE CAN LOOK AT IT
AGAIN.
I THINK THAT AND LET YOU KNOW I ASKED.
10:25:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. TYLER HUDSON ONLINE IF WE HAVE
ANY QUESTIONS.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
NO?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN VIERA, READ ITEM NUMBER 4.
10:26:01 >>LUIS VIERA:
SURE.
MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
2022-21 PASSED AND ORDAINED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TAMPA ON FEBRUARY 17, 2022.
CORRECTING A SCRIVENER'S ERROR BY SUBSTITUTING A NEW
EXHIBIT A FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EXHIBIT A TO
ACCURATELY REFLECT THE TEXT AMENDMENT LANGUAGE SO IT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE TEXT AMENDMENT LANGUAGE IN
ORDINANCE 2022-21.
10:26:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA AND
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED.
10:26:42 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10:26:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM NUMBER 5 YOU JAMIE MAIER ON
STANDBY WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
10:26:52 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
AGAIN TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR BY SUBSTITUTING A
NEW EXHIBIT A WHICH COUNCIL PASSED ON FEBRUARY 17.
THIS IS JUST A CORRECTION TO THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION,
AGAIN, THE INCORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS ATTACHED TO
THE ORDINANCE ADOPTED.
10:27:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
ALL RIGHT.
REMEMBER WE HAVE SOMEBODY ON STANDBY.
COUNCILMAN CITRO DO YOU WANT TO READ ITEM NUMBER 5?
10:27:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, MR. CHAIR.
FILE NUMBER AB2-21-28, ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-38 PASS AND
ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA ON
FEBRUARY 17, 2022.
CORRECTING A SCRIVENER'S ERROR BY SUBSTITUTING A NEW
EXHIBIT A FOR THE PREVIOUS APPROVED EXHIBIT A TO
REFLECT AN ACCURATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
SITE PLAN IN ORDINANCE OF 2022-38, APPROVING FOR
SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
10:28:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
10:28:10 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING MAY 25, AT 9:30 A.M.
10:28:19 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
10:28:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WOULD YOU LIKE TO MOVE ITEMS 6
THROUGH 9.
10:28:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I MOVE 6-9.
10:28:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:28:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT, COUNCILMAN GUDES, PARKS AND RECREATION
CULTURAL COMMITTEE.
YES, SIR.
10:28:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ITEMS
10-16.
10:28:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED.
NEXT UP, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
10:28:51 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE 17-26 PLEASE.
10:28:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND YOU.
10:28:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT.
FINANCE COMMITTEE IS ITEM NUMBER 27.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
10:29:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
ITEM NUMBER 27 YOU IS APPOINTMENT
BY THE MAYOR OF THOMAS A. HAMMER TO THE BARRIO LATINO
COMMISSION FOR A THREE-YEAR.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ANY OPPOSED.
BUILDING PRESERVATION, ITEM 28-39.
10:29:23 >>BILL CARLSON:
LIKE TO MOVER 28 TO 39.
10:29:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:29:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED.
10:29:29 >>BILL CARLSON:
TO COMMENT ON NUMBER 32, THANK YOU FOR
THE ADMINISTRATION AN GRANTS DEPARTMENT TO CONTINUE TO
WORK ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
10:29:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
VERY GOOD.
$2 MILLION YOU COUNCILMAN VIERA, ITEM 42-46.
10:29:45 >>BILL CARLSON:
I NEED TO PULL 43 AND 44 TO VOTE
SEPARATELY.
I NEED TO VOTE TO RECUSE MYSELF BECAUSE MY FIRM HAS A
CLIENT THAT IS RELATED TO EACH OF THESE ISSUES AND I
WILL BE FILING THE APPROPRIATE FORM.
VOTE ON THE OTHER ONES.
10:29:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA, IF YOU MOVE
40-42 AND 45 AND 46.
10:30:06 >>LUIS VIERA:
MOVE 40-42 AND 45 AND 46.
10:30:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:30:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS.
10:30:16 >>LUIS VIERA:
40-42 AND 45-46.
10:30:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, YOU ARE RECUSING YOURSELF AND WILL
FILE THE FORMULATOR ON.
SO ITEMS 43 AND 44.
10:30:29 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR, SO MOVED.
10:30:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:30:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA AND
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
10:30:38 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIES WITH CARLSON ABSTAINING.
10:30:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY, WE HAVE NOT MADE MOTION TO
OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
10:30:47 >> SO MOVED.
10:30:47 >> SECOND.
10:30:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IT IS 10:30.
WE CAN OPEN ALL THE WAY THROUGH AIL THE WAY THROUGH 62.
ALL RIGHT, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA HAS MADE A MOTION TO OPEN
ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FROM 48-62.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ALL RIGHT.
WE ARE AT NUMBER 48.
10:31:33 >>ELAINE LUND:
GOOD MORNING, I AM ELAINE LUND,
PLANNING STAFF.
IF I HAVE PERMISSION TO SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THE SCREEN?
10:31:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NOT YET.
ALL RIGHT, WE CAN HEAR YOUR
SCREEN.
IF YOU WERE NOT SPEAKING, PLEASE MUTE YOURSELF.
IF YOU ARE NOT SPEAKING, PLEASE MUTE YOURSELF.
PLEASE MUTE YOURSELF.
10:32:13 >>ELAINE LUND:
ALL RIGHT, SO GOOD MORNING.
THIS IS THE PRESENTATION FOR THE MACFARLANE BUILDING
LOCAL LANDMARK.
PROPERTY 1902 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
THE OWNER MACFARLANE BUILDING LCC FOR A LOCAL LANDMARK
ON JUNE 15 AND APPLICATION IS REVIEWED BY THE HISTORIC
PRESENTATION COMMITTEE AND ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES MUST
MEET THE CRITERIA OF 27-257 OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE
OF ORDINANCES.
LOCAL HISTORIC DESIGNATION PRESERVES, PROMOTES AND
PROTECTS INDIVIDUAL LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMPA.
ON THE LEFT HERE, YOU SEE THE 1915 SANBORN MAP SHOWING
THE BRICK BLOCK.
IT IS OUTLINED IN RED THERE AT THE CORNER OF HOWARD
AVENUE AND CHESTNUT STREET.
ON THE RIGHT, THE PRESENT DAY AERIAL MAP SHOWING THE
SAME PROPERTY.
YOU WILL NOTE THAT TODAY, THE TWO RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES THAT WERE SHOWN ON THE 1915 MAP ARE NO
LONGER STANDING.
WEST TAMPA WAS ESTABLISHED BY HUGH MACFARLANE IN THE
LATE 1880S.
HUGH MACFARLANE MANAGED TO GATHER A LARGE GROUP OF
INVESTMENTS, INVESTORS WHO -- CIGAR MANUFACTURERS TO
THE CITY BY CONSTRUCTING CIGAR FACTORIES AND
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING FOR THE WORKERS.
THE PARTICULAR NORTH QUESTION HERE TODAY IN MCFARLANE
BUILDING IS A TWO-STORY BRICK VERNACULAR WITH
RENAISSANCE REVIVAL DETAILS THAT WERE PARTICULARLY
FOUND ON SEVERAL OF THE HISTORIC CIGAR FACTORIES THAT
WERE BUILT IN WEST.
THE WEST TAMPA HISTORIC DISTRICT WAS LISTED IN THE
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IN 1983 WITH A
PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE, MEANING THE DATE THAT THE
SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC STRUCTURES WERE FOUND THROUGHOUT
THE DISTRICT FROM 1893 TO 1933.
SO THE MACFARLANE BUILDING WAS BUILT IN THIS PERIOD OF
SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE WEST TAMPA HISTORIC DISTRICT.
THE CITY OF TAMPA REMAINED AN INDEPENDENT INCORPORATED
CITY UNTIL 1925 WHEN IT WAS ANNEX FLOOD THE CITY OF
TAMPA.
THE WEST TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LIST SOMETHING A
LOCAL HISTORIC DESIGNATION THAT WAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY
OF TAMPA IN 2006.
CURRENTLY IT INCLUDES ONE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND TWO
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON LASALLE STREET.
AS STATED, THE APPLICATION WAS MADE ON JUNE 15 OF 2021,
AND THE HPC REVIEWED THE PROPERTY AND RECOMMENDED FOR
LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AS PART OF THE WEST
COMPANY MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTING ON SEPTEMBER 9,
2021.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
FOUND IT CONSISTENT ON OCTOBER 26 OF THAT YEAR.
NOTICE WAS PROVIDED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER TO NEARBY
PROPERTY OWNERS AND REGISTERED ORGANIZATIONS.
THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FOUND THAT THE
APPLICATION DID MEET THE CRITERIA OF SECTION 27-257 AND
THAT IT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1905 AND SIGNIFICANT IN THE
AREA OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND
ARCHITECTURE.
AND IN SUMMARY, THE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TAMPA CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE THE DESIGNATION OF THE MACFARLANE
BUILDING AS A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK AND PART OF THE
WEST TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTING BASED ON MEETING
THE CRY TIERRIA 27-257.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE OWNER WHO IS PRESENT TODAY
FOR HIS SUPPORT OF THIS DESIGNATION AND FOR HIS
INVESTMENT IN HISTORIC WEST TAMPA.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU.
10:36:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SO, AS IT WAS MENTIONED AND I LOVE TAMPA HISTORY SO
MUCH.
THROW IN TIDBITS.
HUGH MCFARLANE IS KNOWN AS THE FATHER OF WEST TAMPA AND
THE NAMESAKE OF THIS BUILDING.
HE WAS CITY ATTORNEY BACK IN 1809, I BELIEVE.
HE WAS CREDITED WITH EXTENDING THE STREETCAR INTO WEST.
MACFARLANE PARK, WHICH HE DONATED TO THE PEOPLE, WAS
ORIGINALLY A GOLF COURSE AND NOW IT IS A BEAUTIFUL
PARK.
SO A LOT -- THERE IS A LOT OF HISTORY BEHIND THIS NAME
AND EVEN BOB HENREQUEZ, OUR PROPERTY APPRAISER, HIS
GREAT GRANDFATHER ONE -- ONE OF THE LAST -- OR MAYORS
OF.
YBOR CITY WAS ANNEXED BY THE CITY.
THE CITY OF WEST TAMPA UNTIL 1925 WAS ITS OWN
ESTABLISHED MUNICIPALITY WITH ITS OWN MAYOR AND
GOVERNMENT.
THAT IS YOUR HISTORY LESSON FOR TODAY.
I HOPE YOU ENJOYED IT.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
I HAD TO DO IT.
10:37:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
DID WE PASS THE HISTORY LESSON.
THAT IS WHAT I WANT TO KNOW.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:37:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY.
DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT HERE?
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
10:37:27 >> GOOD MORNING, MY NAME IS --
[INAUDIBLE]
-- THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
WE HAVE DONE A LOT OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION WORK IN THE
ANY IN THE PAST AND PLAN TO RESTORE THIS BUILDING AND
DEVELOPMENT IT TO THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS.
WITH US ARE STEPHANIE FARRELL OUR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
CONSULTANTS AND WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
10:37:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT
AND THE CONSULTANT.
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 48?
10:38:00 >> NO ONE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON ITEM 48.
10:38:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:38:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES,
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
STEPHANIE FARRELL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR HISTORIC WORK.
I ALWAYS ADMIRED YOU.
ALL IN FAVOR.
THE PERSON WE LEFT OFF WITH YOU COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
COULD YOU READ NUMBER 48.
10:38:28 >>LYNN HURTAK:
ITEM 48 E 2022-8 CHAPTER 27.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING K, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
WEST TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES GROUP TO INCLUDE THE
MACFARLANE BUILDING LOCATED 1902 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE,
TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION
3, HEREOF AS A LOCAL LANDMARK PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
10:38:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:38:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
AND THE BUILDING NEXT DOOR IS THE ORIGINAL ALESSI
BAKERY.
YOU KNOW, A LITTLE SOMETHING EXTRA.
10:39:07 >>CLERK:
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
10:39:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MY MOTHER WOULD WAIT ON LINE WITH
MY GRANDPARENTS TO GET BREAD FROM THE BAKERY.
10:39:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CONGRATULATIONS COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
10:39:32 >> THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN.
IS MY SCREEN SHARED FOR ITEM 49?
10:39:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
10:39:38 >>ELAINE LUND:
THIS ITEM IN FRONT OF YOU --
10:39:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
JUST A MOMENT.
YES, MA'AM.
10:39:44 >>CLERK:
NUMBER 48, THE MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON
AND VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2022
AT 9:30 A.M.
10:39:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
10:39:56 >>ELAINE LUND:
THANK YOU, SIR.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 49 IS 1208 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
ADDITIONALLY AN APPLICATION BEFORE YOU FOR
CONSIDERATION FOR LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION
AND IN ADDITION TO THE TAMPA MULTIPLE -- THE WEST TAMPA
MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTING.
THE OWNER, AIA TAMPA BAY, SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR
LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION JUNE 22, 2021.
PROPERTIES ARE CONSIDERED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION BY A PUBLIC MEET TO SEE IF THEM MEET THE
DESIGNATION CRITERIA OF 257 OF THE CITY'S CODE.
LOCAL HISTORIC DESIGNATION PRESERVES HISTORIC LANDMARKS
AND ALLOW FOR THE REVIEW OF ALTERATIONS TO THE
DESIGNATED PROPERTIES AND PROVIDES ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO
THE CITY AT LARGE.
THIS BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED CIRCA 1906 IN THE CITY OF
TAMPA.
ON YOUR LEFT IS 1914 SHOWING THE BRICK STRUCTURE ON
HOWARD AVENUE BETWEEN NASSAU AND ARCH STREETS.
PLEASE NOTE, THIS IS AN ENTIRE BRICK BLOCK MEANING THE
ENTIRE AREA BETWEEN ARCH STREET AND THE ALLEY THERE IS
BRICK, BUT ONLY THE SOUTH HALF OF THE -- THE BRICK
BLOCK IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE STRUCTURE THAT IS UNDER
YOUR REVIEW HERE TODAY.
THE IMAGE ON THE RIGHT IS THE MODERN-DAY AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPH WITH THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
THE 1906 BUILDING AT 1208 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE WAS
CONSTRUCTED JUST ACROSS THE ALLEY FROM A PROMINENT
CIGAR FACTORY.
TRADITIONALLY, IT WAS THE SI DAVIS COMPANY HERE, AND NOW
IT IS KNOWN AS THE BALBIN BROTHERS CIGAR FACTORY.
CONSTRUCTED WITH A COMMERCIAL WITH A RESTAURANT IN IT.
AND THE RESTAURANT SERVED WORKERS AT THE CIGAR FACTORY.
HERE YOU SEE SOME IMAGES OF SOME OF THE HISTORIC
INTERIOR THE PRESSED TIN CEILING AND A COLD STORAGE
DOOR WHICH WAS SORT OF BEFORE REFRIGERATORS WERE WIDELY
IN USE.
SO THE WEST TAMPA HISTORIC DISTRICT, AGAIN, WAS LISTED
ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES WITH PERIOD
OF 1893 TO 1933.
THEREFORE, THIS BUILDING WAS BUILT DURING THE PERIOD OF
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE WEST TAMPA HISTORIC DISTRICT.
AND IT IS PROPOSED TO YOU TODAY AS PART OF THE WEST
TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTING AS DESIGNATED BY THE
CITY OF TAMPA.
THE APPLICATION DATE WAS JUNE 22, 2021.
AND THE HPC REVIEWED IT AND RECOMMENDED IT FOR LOCAL
LANDMARK DESIGNATION AS PART OF THIS MULTIPLE
PROPERTIES LISTING ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2021.
DECEMBER 1, 2021, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE
APPLICATION TO BE CONSISTENT.
NOTICE WAS PROVIDED TO THE OWNER, NEARBY PROPERTY
OWNERS AND REGISTERED ORGANIZATIONS.
THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 27-257
NOTES THAT THE BUILDING MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OR ACHIEVED
DURING A PERIOD OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE.
AND THIS BUILDING WAS IN 1906.
AND IT STATES THAT THE DESIGNATED LANDS MARKS MUST BE
-- MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA.
THIS BUILDING IS IN THE AREA OF COMMERCE AND IN THE
AREA OF ARCHITECTURE AS A TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF A WEST
TAMPA HISTORIC STRUCTURE FROM THIS EARLIER A.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 1208 NORTH
HOWARD AVENUE AS A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK AND PART OF
THE WEST TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LISTING AS BASE ON
THE CRITERIA 2022-257.
STAFF WOULD LIKE TO THANK TAMPA MULTIPROPERTIES GROUP.
AND WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE AIA GROUP IN THE
AUDIENCE.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
10:44:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU.
I DON'T HAVE A HISTORY LESSON ON THIS BUILDING.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
NOPE.
YES, SIR, MR. MOORE.
10:44:21 >> GOOD MORNING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
WELCOME, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
NICE TO SEE YOU.
I AM JONATHAN MOORE, THE CURRENT VICE PRESIDENT OF
AIA TAMPA BAY.
ON BEHALF OF OUR CURRENT PRESIDENT GERALD MCCANTS, OUR
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DON MADRIS WHO ARE HERE AND OUR 750
LOCAL MEMBERS, WE ARE THRILLED TO BE ABLE TO SERVE AS
AN EXAMPLE IN HISTORICALLY DESIGNATING OUR NEW HOME.
WE ARE VERY EXCITED TO BECOME A PART OF WEST TAMPA AND
OPEN THIS RENOVATED -- RENOVATED BUILDING TO THE
COMMUNITY AS THE CENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN.
THIS DESIGNATION WILL ENSURE THAT THIS BUILDING WILL BE
A PERMANENT ASSET TO WEST TAMPA AND NOT BECOME A
PARKING LOT AS A PREVIOUS OWNER WAS LOOKING TO DO.
AND WE WILL BE SURE TO INVITE EVERYONE TO OUR GRAND
OPENING LATER THIS YEAR, AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR
SUPPORT.
10:45:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
NOPE?
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM 49 IN THE AUDIENCE?
I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK.
BUT ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK IN A MOTION TO CLOSE BY
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN GUDES, READ 49.
10:45:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I WILL TAKE A STAB AT IT, FILE NUMBER
E 2022-8 CHAPTER 27, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA,
ENDING THE WEST TAMPA MULTIPLE PROPERTIES GROUP TO
INCLUDE PROPERTY LOCATED 1208 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE
TAMPA, FLORIDA, AS PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS A LOCAL
LANDMARK PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT,
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
10:46:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
10:46:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR OPINION AYE.
ANY OPPOSED.
10:46:11 >>CLERK:
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MAY 5,
2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
10:46:19 >>BILL CARLSON:
SINCE YOU DIDN'T TELL A HISTORY STORY.
THANKS TO AIA FOR STARTING HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE
UNITED STATES.
I HAVE BEEN TO THEIR HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGTON D.C.
AND TAKEN A TOWARD WITH MICKEY JACOBS THE INTERNATIONAL
PRESIDENT OF AIA.
NOT EVERYBODY KNOWS, REMEMBER THE STORY OF DOLLY
MADISON PULLING THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PAINTING OUT OF
THE WHITE HOUSE --
10:46:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE ONE FADED AT THE BOTTOM.
10:46:43 >>BILL CARLSON:
BRITISH INVADED AND WHERE DID THE
PRESIDENT AND HIS WIFE GO, TO A BUILDING TWO BLOCKS
AWAY AND THAT BUILDING IN THE LATE 1800S PRESERVED BY
THE AIA START OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MOVEMENT IN
THE UNITED STATES AND HEADQUARTERS IS ADJACENT AND CAN
CONNECTED TO IT AND YOU CAN VISIT IT.
10:47:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU GO TO MY OFFICE, I HAVE OLD
LIFE MAGAZINES FROM THE '60S AND URBAN RENEWAL AND LOSS
OF SO MANY BUILDINGS BEFORE HISTORIC WAS A COMMERCIALLY
USED TERM.
I WISH I HAD A TIME MACHINE TO PRESERVE THESE OLD
BUILDINGS BUT WE DO WHAT WE CAN TODAY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
DID WE TAKE A VOTE ON THAT.
DID YOU ANNOUNCE THE SECOND READING.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE GO TO OUR 9:30 PUBLIC HEARING.
WE OPENED EVERYTHING.
NONQUASIJUDICIAL.
ITEM NUMBER 50, THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WOULD
HAVE TO JUST MOVE THE RESOLUTION AFTERWARDS, CORRECT.
10:47:44 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
THAT IS CORRECT.
MR. CHAIR.
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
AGREEMENT FOR THE MIDTOWN DEVELOPMENT WHICH I AM SURE
YOU ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH.
THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS BEING REQUESTED BECAUSE THE PLAT
THAT DEDICATED PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT DID NOT ALLOW
ENCROACHMENTS AND THE DEVELOP WEAR LIKE TO MAKE A
COUPLE OF ENCROACHMENTS AND THIS AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW
THAT ENCROACHMENT.
STORMWATER STAFF IS WORKING ON DEVELOPING THIS
AGREEMENT AND THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF THE LIMITED
ENCROACHMENT THAT WOULD PROVIDE.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
I KNOW THE DEVELOPER'S ATTORNEY MR. BENTLEY IS HERE IF
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
10:48:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?
NO?
10:48:32 >> SECOND.
10:48:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE NEED PUBLIC HEARING.
MR. BENTLEY, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING?
10:48:38 >> NO THANKS.
10:48:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THINKING OF THE HARD DAY'S NIGHT.
10:48:44 >>BILL CARLSON:
YOU KNOW A LOT ABOUT CHARITY.
WHAT IS THAT CHORD ON THE GUITAR.
10:48:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
FOR HARD'S DAY NIGHT?
I DON'T KNOW -- I KNOW IT IS COMPLICATED IF YOU GO TO
YOUTUBE.
A PROFESSOR DID AN ANALYSIS.
10:48:56 >> THE ANSWER IS YOU DON'T KNOW.
10:48:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I DON'T KNOW BUT I KNOW A LOT OF
STUFF.
10:49:03 >> I DON'T HAVE ANY COMMENTS.
10:49:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO
SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 50.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED.
MOVE THE RESOLUTION BEFORE WE CLOSE OR AFTER.
MOTION TO CLOSE.
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND SECOND
FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
WHO WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE RESOLUTION.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO MOVE THE RESOLUTION.
10:49:30 >>LYNN HURTAK:
SURE, FILE NUMBER -- AM I -- APPRECIATE
IT.
RESOLUTION APPROVED FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TAMPA AND TAMPA BAY 1 LCC
AUTHORIZING THE EXCUSE THEREOF BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY
OF TAMPA PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
10:49:46 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
10:49:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION CARRIED.
10:49:53 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH GUDES ABSENT AT VOTE.
10:50:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
51, NONQUASI.
10:50:02 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE FROM
THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
THIS IS A SECOND READING FOR CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENTS FOR
CONSIDERATION BASED ON THE 2021 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
UPDATE.
AND -- I BELIEVE STAFF ORIGINALLY AND -- THE BUILDING
OFFICIAL JC HUTCHINSON AND ABBYE FEELEY AND FOR THE
FIRST READING.
10:50:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.
HEARING NONE.
WE DO HAVE JEAN STROHMEYER, REGISTERED FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT.
UNMUTE YOURSELF IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND
SPEAK.
IS JEAN LOGGED IN?
10:50:42 >>CLERK:
JEAN, IF YOU ARE ON THE LINE, PLEASE UNMUTE
YOURSELF AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
SHE IS CURRENTLY STUCK IN MUTE.
10:50:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
JEAN, IF YOU CAN HEAR ME, UNMUTE
YOURSELF.
JEAN STROHMEYER.
THAT IS THE ONLY REGISTERED PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WE
HAVE.
ONE LAST CALL FOR JEAN -- JEAN?
10:51:11 >> HELLO?
SORRY.
10:51:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
10:51:15 >> OKAY, WAIT.
I AM WORKING.
WHAT ISSUE ARE WE ON.
10:51:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM NUMBER 51.
YOU ARE ALSO REGISTERED FOR 53.
THIS IS FOR 51.
10:51:24 >> OKAY.
HI, MY NAME IS JEAN STROHMEYER, ITEM 51 OF AMENDING THE
CODE.
I FORGOT WHAT THIS WAS ABOUT AND THAT IS OKAY.
I HAVE AN ACTUAL JOB.
ENDING THE CODE.
WE NEED TO AMEND THE CODE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BALANCE
OF POWER IS FAIR FOR EVERYBODY.
BECAUSE THIS STRONG MAYOR FORM OF GOVERNMENT -- I AM --
LOOKING AT IT ON THE AGENDA.
BUT IT IS TOO MUCH.
SO THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
HAVE A GREAT DAY.
10:51:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANYBODY ELSE?
ALL RIGHT.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
IF NOT, MOTION TO CLOSE.
10:52:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOTION.
10:52:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
10:52:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, I BELIEVE WE LEFT OFF FROM YOU,
SIR.
ITEM 51.
10:52:22 >>BILL CARLSON:
I LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER E 2022-8 CH
5, ORDINANCE PROVIDED FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA MAKING REVISIONS TO THE
CITY TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 5, BUILDING CODE
ENDING SECTION 5-105.3.
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT AMENDING SECTION 5-105.3.1.
ACTION ON ACTION AMENDING SECTION 5.105.3.4 TIME LIMIT
ON SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, REFUSAL TO ISSUE PERMIT.
AND AMENDING SECTION 5-106.1.
SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS AMENDING SECTION 5.106.5, RETENTION
OF CONSTRUCTION AMENDING SECTION 5-109.1.
INSPECTIONS AND SECTION 5-109.5 INSPECTION REQUEST
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH, PROVIDING SO FOR SEVERABILITY.
10:53:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
10:53:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ROLL CALL.
10:53:36 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
10:53:37 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
10:53:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
10:53:40 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
10:53:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
10:53:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
10:53:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
10:53:49 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10:53:52 >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. CHAIRMAN, NEXT TIME GET THE ONE
WITH FEWER NUMBERS.
10:53:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I WILL SEE WHAT I CAN DO.
NUMBER 52, IF YOU NEED TO BE SWORN IN RISE YOUR RIGHT
HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.
VIRTUAL AND IN-PERSON APPEARANCES.
[SWEARING IN]
10:54:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
EVERYBODY HAS BEEN SWORN IN.
ITEM NUMBER 52, ANNIE BARNES, GO AHEAD,
10:54:18 >>ANNIE BARNES:
GOOD MORNING, COUNCIL.
ANNIE BARNES, SU-221-07 FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
FOR 201, 203 AND 205 SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE.
SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A BANK DRIVE IN.
SITE PLANS WERE DROPPED OFF AT CITY HALL YESTERDAY AND
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?
NO QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT, I SAW JONATHAN SCOTT, BUT HE IS OFF CAMERA.
NO?
I GUESS THE APPLICANT.
YOU ARE THE APPLICANT -- ARE YOU THE APPLICANT?
10:54:56 >> YES, SIR.
10:54:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I SAW HIM COME ON AND OFF.
10:55:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I INDUSTRIAL ONE MORE QUESTION ABOUT
THIS.
10:55:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WITH JONATHAN SCOTT.
IF JONATHAN SCOTT IS ON.
COUNCILMAN CITRO.
10:55:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SCOTT, AGAIN, YOU HAVE ENTRANCES
AND EXITS ON ONE-WAY STREETS THAT RUN PERPENDICULAR TO
ONE ANOTHER.
THAT HAS PASSED THROUGH TRANSPORTATION.
10:55:29 >>JONATHAN SCOTT:
YES, WE REVIEWED THAT AND WE ARE OKAY
WITH IT.
10:55:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGAIN, I HAVE CONCERNS.
THE ONLY THING I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THIS APPLICATION.
I CAN JUST SEE RIGHT NOW IN THE FUTURE BACK-UPS ON --
WHAT IS IT, CLEVELAND AND HOWARD.
MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:55:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANY QUESTIONS?
MR. MOORE.
10:55:58 >> JONATHAN MOORE, ENVISION ADVISORS.
OTHER THE AUTHORIZED OWNERS AND ADVISORS ON THE
PROJECT.
HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
10:56:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. MOORE, YOU JUST HEARD OUR COMMENT.
YOU HAVE TO ADMIT WITH ENTRANCE AND EXITS JUST TWO OF
THEM ON ONE WAY STREETS GOING PERPENDICULAR TO ONE
ANOTHER, I SEE THIS AS A -- AS A TRAFFIC NIGHTMARE
ESPECIALLY DURING RUSH SHOWER.
10:56:20 >> THERE IS A TURN ALSO OUT OF THE ALLEY.
WE ARE RIGHT TURN ONLY ON TO CLEVELAND, HOWEVER.
WE DON'T WANT OUR PATRONS TO GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE
OF THE ALLEY.
YOU KNOW, IT IS A SMALL COMMUNITY BANK.
WE DON'T ANTICIPATE A LARGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC.
WE DO HAVE TWO DRIVE-THRU LANES.
AND WE EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES.
SO WE DON'T THINK THAT WILL BE AN ISSUE.
10:56:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU SAID RIGHT TURN ON TO CLEVELAND.
10:56:48 >> RIGHT TURN INTO THE ALLEY.
RIGHT TURN ONLY ON TO THE ALLEY, NOT LEFT TURN.
I APOLOGIZE.
10:56:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. CHAIR.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MR. MOORE, THANK YOU.
JUST FUTURE THOUGHT.
10:57:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I CAN ELSE?
ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
10:57:03 >> NO, SIR.
10:57:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY HERE IN THE PUBLIC THAT
PUSHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 52?
I SEE NONE AND WE DO NOT HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS
FOR 52.
MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE.
10:57:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SO MOVED.
10:57:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES AND
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
10:57:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SU 2-21-TO 7, ORDINANCE SECOND
READING AND APPROVAL A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2
APPROVING A BANK DRIVE-IN A CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL
ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 201, 203 AND
205 SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA.
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF AND
PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE.
10:57:51 >>LUIS VIERA:
SECOND.
10:57:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
10:57:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THEY.
10:57:56 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
10:57:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
10:58:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
10:58:02 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
10:58:03 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
10:58:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
10:58:10 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10:58:11 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
10:58:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM 53, ANNIE BARNES IS ON THE
LINE,
10:58:20 >>ANNIE BARNES:
LAND DEVELOPMENT, ITEM NUMBER 53,
REZ-21-89 FOR 5202 SOUTH PURITAN AVENUE FROM RS-60 TO
RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
10:58:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
YES, SIR, MR. MICHELINI.
10:58:40 >> STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
YOU MIGHT RECALL THIS PETITION WAS REORIENTED THE
EXISTING TWO LOTS AND TURNING THEM SO THEY ARE
CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE OTHER HOUSES
ON -- ALONG BALLAST POINT.
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
10:58:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
HEARING NONE.
ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM
NUMBER 53.
SEEING NO ONE.
I KNOW JEAN STROHMEYER WHO IS REGISTERED AND JEAN
HAS BEEN SWORN IN, I BELIEVE.
NO, YOU KNOW WHAT, MISS STROHMEYER, IF WE CAN SWEAR YOU
IN.
DOES SHE NEED TO BE -- CAN YOU TURN YOUR CAMERA ON.
WE NEED TO SEE YOUR FACE BECAUSE IT IS A SECOND READING
AND QUASI JUDICIAL.
JEAN STROHMEYER.
10:59:36 >>CLERK:
SHE IS CURRENTLY SELF-MUTED.
SHE WILL NEED TO UNMUTE HERSELF AND ACTIVATE HER CAMERA
SO SHE CAN BE SWORN IN.
10:59:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY, JEAN STROHMEYER, FULL PLEASE
UNMUTE YOURSELF AND TURN YOUR CAMERA ON SO WE CAN SEE
YOUR FACE AND SWEAR YOU IN.
10:59:57 >>CLERK:
JEAN IS CURRENTLY NOT REGISTERED.
10:59:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WELL, ANYBODY ELSE FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT VIRTUALLY.
THE ONLY PERSON.
A MOTION TO CLOSE.
11:00:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SO MOVED.
11:00:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
11:00:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
COUNCILMAN VIERA, READ ITEM 53.
11:00:13 >>LUIS VIERA:
MOVE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND READING AND
ADOPTION REZONING PROPERTY 520 2 SOUTH PURITAN
AVENUE IN THE ST. CITY OF TAMPA MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, REZONING RS-60 RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY.
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:00:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:00:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
11:00:37 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:00:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:00:40 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:00:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
11:00:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
11:00:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:00:46 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:00:52 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCIL.
11:00:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEMS NUMBER 54.
MISS BARNES.
11:01:02 >>ANNIE BARNES:
ITEM NUMBER 54 REZ-21-122.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 409 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE.
FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND
RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY.
AND DOCUMENTS WERE DROPPED OFF.
I AM AVAILABLE TO IN QUESTIONS.
11:01:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I SEE MR. DOBSON.
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR NEW BEFORE YOU
SPEAK.
[SWEARING IN]
11:01:33 >> I DO.
11:01:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR, GO
AHEAD.
11:01:38 >> NO REAL ISSUES HERE.
I BELIEVE EVERYTHING WAS FOUND CONSISTENT BY ALL THE
DEPARTMENTS THAT REVIEWED.
AND WE RECEIVED A FAVORABLE VOTE LAST TIME.
I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
11:01:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, SEEING NONE.
ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER
54?
I SEE NO ONE.
AND THE GENTLEMAN IS THE ONLY REGISTERED SPEAKER.
MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE.
11:02:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION.
11:02:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:02:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED.
COUNCILMAN CITRO, READ ITEM 54.
11:02:18 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
REZ-21-122, AN ORDINANCE BEING
PRESENTED FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF REZONING
THE PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 409 SOUTH
FREMONT AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY TO PD,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED AND RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:02:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:02:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
11:02:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
11:02:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
11:02:49 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
11:02:50 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:02:51 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:02:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:02:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:02:56 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:03:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU.
11:03:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANNIE BARNES.
11:03:06 >>ANNIE BARNES:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
ANNIE BARNES.
NUMBER 55 IS REZ-21-125 FOR SECOND READING AN ADOPTION
FOR 2501 NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE.
THE REQUEST IS FROM RS-60 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY TO
RS-50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
11:03:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? DO WE
HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 55?
WE DO NOT HAVE AN APPLICANT HERE.
NO ONE REGISTERED FOR 55.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
11:03:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SO MOVED.
11:03:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
11:03:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND BY MIRANDA.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
NUMBER 55.
11:03:59 >>LYNN HURTAK:
55, FILE NUMBER R EZ 21-125.
FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE REZONING
PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2501 NORTH GLENWOOD
DRIVE IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
RS-60 AND RS-50.
11:04:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
11:04:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
11:04:26 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:04:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:04:27 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:04:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
11:04:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
11:04:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:04:37 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:04:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NEXT UP, ITEM NUMBER 56.
YES, MA'AM.
ANNIE BARNES.
11:04:46 >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, ITEM NUMBER 5, FILE
NUMBER REZ-22-22, FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR
3304 WEST HORATIO STREET FROM RM-24 TO PD FOR PLACE OF
RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
AND DOCUMENTS WERE DROPPED OFF AND I AM AVAILABLE ANY
QUESTIONS.
11:05:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IF I QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?
APPLICANT FOR 56?
11:05:13 >> JONATHAN MOORE, ENVISION ADVISORS, THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE FOR FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TAMPA.
YOU RECALL THIS IS THE PROJECT THAT THE FIRST
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TAMPA SOLD THEIR PROPERTY
DOWNTOWN.
THEY ARE MOVING TO SOUTH TAMPA ON THE PROPERTY OF AN
OLD UNITARIAN CHURCH THAT HAD SEVERAL NONCOMPLIANT
ZONING ISSUES THAT WE BROUGHT THAT INTO COMPLIANCE AND
ASK FOR A FEW WAIVERS.
I BELIEVE EVERYTHING IS FOUND CONSISTENT.
I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
11:05:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT?
WE DO NOT.
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM
NUMBER 56?
WE DO NOT.
AND WE HAVE NOT ANYBODY REGISTERED.
HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
COUNCILMAN GUDES, ITEM NUMBER 56 IF YOU WOULD LIKE.
11:06:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
FILE NUMBER REZ 22-22, ORDINANCE
REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VIN TEE OF 3302 WEST
HORATIO STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 OF ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION RM-24, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY TO PD,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORIGINAL MOTION TO APPROVE BY CARLSON-MANISCALCO, THAT
THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE
COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FURTHER IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE THAT IT WILL NOT
SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE
PROPERTY WILL BE FA AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS AND THAT
THE SITE PLAN BY ANNIE BARNES FROM DEVELOPMENT AND
GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
11:06:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:06:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
11:07:00 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:07:03 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:07:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:07:05 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
11:07:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
11:07:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:07:10 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:07:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ITEM NUMBER 57.
WE HAVE -- YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
11:07:19 >> LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I NEED TO BE SWORN IN, PLEASE.
[SWEARING-IN]
11:07:28 >> I DO.
ROSS SALMANS LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
PRESENTING V AC 21-18 FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.
A VACATING REQUEST FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALLEYWAY
LOCATED SOUTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD, NORTH OF CLEVELAND
STREET, EAST OF HESPERIDES STREET AND WEST OF LAUBER
WAY.
STAFF IS AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
11:07:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF THE GENTLEMAN?
NOPE?
OKAY.
MR. PRESSMAN.
YOU ARE IN PERSON BUT REGISTERED VIRTUALLY.
SO I WILL SCRATCH YOU OUT HERE.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
11:08:08 >> I ASSUME YOU PREFER ME HERE PERSONALLY, MR.
CHAIRMAN.
BUT I WILL WAIVE A PRESENTATION UNLESS THERE ARE
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC, IF I MAY.
11:08:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE
APPLICANT IF I MAY.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK
ON ITEM NUMBER 57?
NO ONE REGISTERED OTHER THAN THE GENTLEMAN THAT IS
HERE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
11:08:28 >>LYNN HURTAK:
MOTION.
11:08:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:08:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, ITEM NUMBER 57.
11:08:42 >>BILL CARLSON:
MOVE FILE NUMBER VAC 21-18, PRESENTED
FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF TAMPA, TAMPA, FLORIDA, VACATING CLOSING
DISCONTINUING AND ABANDONING A RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALLEYWAY
LOCATED SOUTH OF KENNEDY, NORTH OF CLEVELAND STREET,
EAST OF HESPERIDES STREET, AND WEST OF LAUBER WAY WITH
THE PLAT OF ROSEMONT SUBDIVISION, OF THE CITY OF TAMPA,
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT
AND PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS, INTERPRETATIONS
AND REPEALING CONFLICTS PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:09:21 >>LYNN HURTAK:
SECOND.
11:09:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ROLL CALL.
11:09:24 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:09:25 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:09:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:09:29 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
11:09:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
11:09:35 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
11:09:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:09:39 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO AND
CITRO BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.
11:09:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM NUMBER 58.
WE COULDN'T DO THIS EARLIER BECAUSE IT WASN'T THE TIME.
BUT AN ITEM TO BE CONTINUED UNTIL
MAY 5.
A MOTION TO CONTINUE.
11:10:01 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOTION.
11:10:03 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
11:10:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT, WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 59.
11:10:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN.
11:10:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
DO YOU WANT A PUBLIC COMMENT ON
THE CONTINUANCE?
11:10:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY IS HERE TO
SPEAK TO IT.
11:10:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYONE TO SPEAK ON 58, BY ANY
CHANCE?
11:10:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
11:10:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I WILL ASK AHEAD OF TIME BEFORE
THE CONTINUANCE.
NO ONE REGISTERED.
ITEM NUMBER 59, GO AHEAD, ROSS.
11:10:39 >> I WILL LIKE TO ASK THE CLERK TO SHARE MY SCREEN,
PLEASE CAN EVERYBODY SEE MY SCREEN?
11:10:52 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:11:00 >> ROSS SALMON, PROVIDING FILE NUMBER VAC-22-01.
THE APPLICANT IS MAKO WASH, INC.
PROPOSED REQUEST IS TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE ALLEY TO
SOUTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD, NORTH OF CLEVELAND AVENUE,
EAST OF MOODY AVENUE AND WEST OF HOWARD AVENUE.
CREATED FOR THE ALLEY IS IN THE PLAT OF OSCAWANA AND IN
THE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT.
THE APPLICATION WAS FILED NOVEMBER 2, 2021.
THE APPLICANT OWNS ALL THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH SIDE
OF THE ALLEY AND THE LOT TO THE ABUTTING PORTION OF THE
REQUEST TO BE VACATED.
THE REASON FOR THE APPLICATION IS FOLLOWS: THE ALLEY
IS A LITTERING AND STRONG GARBAGE AREA AND CONSTRAINT
CLEANUP.
UNSECURED AND UNSAFE AT NIGHT.
COMPLEMENTED BY A DARK PARKING LOT WITH NO LIGHTS, VERY
HIGH WINDOWLESS BUILDINGS ON BOTH SIDES THAT PERFECT
TPD NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTS.
THE ALLEY IN THE SOUTH HOWARD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND
NO CODE VIOLATION EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY.
AGAIN, HE IS REQUESTING TO VACATE THE EAST LEG OF A
T-SHAPED ALLEY ON 103 SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE.
AND THE ALLEY HAS 1800 SQUARE FEET.
COMPLETELY APPROVED ASPHALT PAVING AND OF THE OWNERS OF
THE NORTH AND SOUTH PORTION AS ACCESS TO HOWARD AVENUE.
SOLID WASTE USES THE ALLEY FOR TRASH COLLECTION.
WASTEWATER, TECO, FRONTIER LOCATING THE ALLEY.
THE ALLEY CONTINUES TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT ALLEY
AND IS APPROVED.
THE ALLEY OF THE EAST WAS PARTIALLY VACATED AND NO
LONGER CONTINUES IN ITS ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION.
HOWEVER, THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WAS REQUIRED TO
DEDICATE A TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT OVER THE PROPERTY TO
ALLOW FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN USE OVER THE PARCEL
TO ACCESS THE REMAINDER OF THE IMPROVED ALLEY AT THAT
BLOCK.
THE YELLOW SECTION IS THE REQUESTED VACATING SECTION OF
THE T-SHAPED ALLEY.
THE NORTH-SOUTH SECTION.
EAST-WEST SECTION.
THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY IS IN RED IN THE NORTH AND TO
THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED VACATING.
IN PINK IS THE PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST.
AND THE PREVIOUS 20-FOOT TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT
DEDICATED THAT I SPOKE OF IS IN BLUE HERE.
TO THE EAST OF THE PROPOSED VACATING.
AGAIN, IN RED, THE PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST IS
LOCATED WITHIN THE OSCAWANA PLAT.
HERE IT SHOWS WITHIN -- WITHIN THIS SECTION THE AREA OF
THE PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST AND, AGAIN, THE
OSCAWANA PLAT SUBDIVISION HERE.
THE EAST-WEST SECTION OF THE ALLEYWAY EAST FROM MOODY
AVENUE.
THE PORTION OF THE ALLEY IS THE SUBJECT VACATING.
EAST-WEST PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOOKING EAST FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH PORTION OF THE
ALLEY.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT OF THE VACATING REQUEST.
AGAIN, THE EAST-WEST VALLEY LOOKING EAST OF MOODY
ANTICIPATE.
THIS PORTION IS NOT TO BE VACATED.
EAST OF THE PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOOKING WEST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH-SOUTH PORTION OF THE ALLEY.
THIS PORTION IS NOT TO BE VACATED.
AGAIN, THE NORTH-SOUTH PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOOKING
NORTH FROM CLEVELAND STREET.
THIS PORTION IS NOT TO BE VACATED.
AND NORTH-SOUTH SECTION OF THE ALLEY LOOKING SOUTH FROM
THE EAST AND WEST PORTION OF THE ALLEY.
REQUESTS TO BE VACATED.
THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY LOOKING SOUTH FROM
KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THESE ARE PROPERTY OWNERS TOWN HOMES THAT ARE ABUT
TODAY NORTH AND SOUTH SECTION OF THE ALLEY THAT IS
REQUESTED TO BE VACATED.
AND, AGAIN, TOWN HOMES.
AND RECOMMENDATION STAFF REJECTS TO THE VACATING
REQUEST BASE AND RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING, TRAFFIC DESIGN, SOUTHWEST AND URBAN DESIGN.
THE REQUEST IS APPROVED BY COUNCIL, EASEMENT IS
REQUIRED FOR OVERALL FOR WASTEWATER, TECO, VOLUNTEER,
TRANSPORTATION AND SOLID WASTE.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT ANNIE MIKULSKI WITH
URBAN DESIGN IS AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
11:15:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS?
YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN GUDES.
11:16:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ROSS.
PUT BACK UP THE ACTUAL PHOTO OF THE ALLEY BEING
VACATED.
11:16:12 >> THIS SECTION HERE?
THE EAST AND WEST SECTION AND THE STOP SIGNS THAT YOU
SEE ARE ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SECTION OF THE ALLEY,
THE T-SHAPED ALLEY AND THE TOWNHOMES OF THE NORTH AND
SOUTH SECTION.
AND THIS EASTERLY PORTION OF THE ALLEY IS TO REQUEST TO
BE VACATED.
BETWEEN THE PARKING HERE AND THIS WALL.
GUDES WHAT IS PAST -- GOING TO THE STOP SIGN FURTHER TO
THE EAST.
AN OPEN ALLEY TOO.
11:16:50 >> YES, I WILL BRING THAT UP.
THIS IS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.
THAT WAS LOOKING EAST.
WE WERE LOOKING WEST FROM THE PREVIOUS IMAGE AND THIS
IS LOOKING EAST.
IF YOU CAN SEE HERE THE GRASS IN THE BACKGROUND PAST
THIS FENCE, THIS IS THE SECTION REQUESTING TO BE
VACATED.
11:17:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
OKAY, INTERESTING.
THANK YOU.
11:17:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANY QUESTIONS?
WE WILL GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
MR. PRESSMAN, YES, SIR.
11:17:28 >> YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT?
I AM THE APPLICANT.
YOU SAID PUBLIC SO I WANT TO MAKE HOUR.
I HAVE A POWERPOINT.
VACATE 22 -- MANY 0S 1.
THERE IS LOITERING, TRASH.
THERE IS A BAD SEPTED CRIMINAL PLANNING AREA AND ALSO
ELIMINATES PUBLIC SAFETY AND DANGEROUS TRAFFIC
SITUATION.
THIS IS THE ACTUAL VACATED AREA BETWEEN HOWARD AND
MOODY ON THE OTHER SIDE.
THIS IS THE CITY STAFF SLIDE, WHICH TELLS YOU THE
SOLID WASTE USES PART OF IT.
AND THE TOWN HOMES THAT ARE LOCATED.
BUT SOLID WASTE ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE OTHER
SIDE OF THE ALLEY.
AND WE CONSIDER AND PROPOSE A BAD SAFETY CONFLICT HERE
ON THE EXITING OF THE ALLEYWAY THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO
VACATE BECAUSE AS SHOWN BY THE STAFF, THERE IS -- THERE
IS A CIRCUITOUS WAY THE ALLEY CONTINUES ON THE NEXT
BLOCK.
AS THE CIRCLE K WAS RENOVATED OR REDEVELOPED, THE
ALLEYWAY WAS CONTINUED BUT PLACED FURTHER BACK.
SO JUST A LITTLE SKIP TO CONTINUE IN THAT EASTWARD
FUNCTION, BUT HOWARD IS A ONE-WAY STREET.
WHEN YOU EXIT THE ALLEY THAT WE ARE PROPOSING, YOU CAN
SEE JUST A LITTLE SKIP AROUND TO CONTINUE ON THAT
EASTWARD ALLEY.
AND LET'S FACE IT, LOOKING TO GET A QUICK CUP OF
COFFEE.
WANTING TO GET TRAFFIC A LITTLE BIT.
SKIRT AROUND A LITTLE BIT.
SO WE ARE PROPOSING OR RAISING TO YOU THAT THE
ACCOMMODATION THAT WAS DONE IN MOVING THAT ALLEYWAY IN
THE NEXT BLOCK ENTICES A BAD OR VERY BAD TRAFFIC
ELEMENT, AGAIN, BECAUSE HOWARD IS A ONE WAY.
SO THE ALLEY WAY IS LOCATED NEXT TO THIS PARKING LOT,
THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT, SPECIFICALLY THE ALLEY THAT
IS SEGMENT.
YOU CAN BEGIN TO SEE THE VERY HIGH WALLS, OVERBEARING
STRUCTURES THAT ARE VERY DARK AT NIGHT, WHICH PROVIDE
AREAS FOR PEOPLE TO LOITER OR TO HIDE.
THIS IS THE SAME ELEMENT ON THE OTHER SIDE AND YOU CAN
SEE EVEN WORSE HERE.
SEPTED PLANNING HAS FOUR BASIC ELEMENTS: NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE.
THERE IS VERY LITTLE SURVEILLANCE BECAUSE IN PART OF IT
BY THE TOWN HOMES.
NATURAL ACCESS CONTROL.
SO THERE IS CONTROL OR PEOPLE CAN SEE THERE IS CONTROL,
WHICH THERE IS VERY LITTLE.
TERRITORIAL REINFORCEMENT, WHICH THERE ISN'T.
MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT AS WELL.
SO BETWEEN THOSE CONCERNS, WE THOUGHT IT WAS
SUPPORTABLE TO BRING FORWARD FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER AND APPROVE.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:20:46 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MR. PRESSMAN, POLICE RECORDS AND DOCUMENTATION OF
ARRESTS OR LOITERING OR CODE ENFORCEMENT RECORDS OF
HAVING TO PICK UP TRASH OR CLEAR THE ALLEY OUT?
11:21:03 >> THE CAR WASH OWNER DOES DO PICK UP FROM GARBAGE
BECAUSE HE HAS A PRETTY SIZABLE PORTION ALONG KENNEDY.
I HAVE TRAFFIC READ OUT FROM THE INTERSECTION WHICH IS
ABOUT 30 ACCIDENTS OVER A YEAR.
BUT I DO -- I WANT TO BE COMPLETELY CLEAR, THAT IS AT
THE INTERSECTION.
HARD TO DISCERN WHERE THOSE ACCIDENTS OCCUR.
BEYOND THAT, THOSE ARE -- THAT IS THE ONLY DATA OR
RECORDS THAT I HAVE.
11:21:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DO YOU HAVE THEM PHYSICAL ON YOU
TODAY?
11:21:29 >> I HAVE THE ACTION RECORD, YES.
11:21:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MAY ANY PLEASE AND THANK YOU, MR.
CHAIR.
11:21:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. WIGGINTON, ANYTHING TODAY?
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SUBMIT THAT HERE TO THE RECORD FOR
MR. SHELBY.
11:21:45 >> YEAH, IF I MAY.
I DON'T HAVE A COPY OF IT.
IF I CAN TAKE A QUICK FEW PICTURES OF IT AND I WILL
GIVE IT TO MR. SHELBY.
11:21:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT TO SHOW -- DO YOU WANT TO
PASS IT UP -- AND DESCRIBE.
11:21:59 >> LET ME TAKE PICTURES.
11:22:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. WIGGINTON.
11:22:04 >>RON WINGGINTON:
I WANT TO EMPHASIZE, AGAIN, AS I COMMUNICATED
BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO MISDIRECT ANYONE THESE ARE
PULLED FROM THE INTERSECTION.
DOES NOT SPECIFY -- THERE ARE ONLY INCIDENTS.
WILL TAKE ANOTHER THREE WEEKS --
11:22:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. PRESSMAN, I AM SURE WE CAN GIVE
THIS BACK TO YOU OR MAKE COPIES OF IT.
11:22:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WE CAN DO THAT.
THE QUESTION IS DO YOU WANT TO DISPLAY THOSE.
11:22:24 >> I WILL PASS THEM.
11:22:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU WILL PASS THEM AROUND.
11:22:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. WIGGINTON, BEFORE WE GO TO
PUBLIC COMMENT.
11:22:34 >>RON WIGGINTON:
RON WIGGINTON, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
I WANTED TO MAKE A POINT OF CLARIFICATION THAT THE
ORDINANCE IS GOING TO BE RESERVING A PERMANENT
TRANSPORTATION BOTH FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR
TRAFFIC.
SO THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CLOSE THE VACATED ALLEYWAY.
SO IT WILL REMAIN OPEN.
11:22:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
REPEAT THAT ONE MORE TIME?
11:22:58 >> RESERVING PERMANENT TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT FOR
VEHICULAR AND TRANSPORTATION SO THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO
CLOSE THE VACATED PORTION OF THE ALLEY WARE.
11:23:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SOLID WASTE CAN COME THROUGH.
HOW ABOUT THE TOWN HOMES?
11:23:14 >> SAME WAY THEY WILL BE ABLE TO ACCESS IT.
11:23:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
REALLY A LEGAL THING TO TAKE OVER
THAT PARCEL OF LAND AND WILL NOT BE CLOSED UP.
THE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE THERE WILL NOT BE AFFECTED
OTHER THAN DRIVING -- ON THE PERSON'S EXTENDED
PROPERTY.
11:23:26 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
AS LONG AS WE MAINTAIN THE PERMANENT TRANSPORTATION
EASEMENT WHICH IS CURRENTLY IN THE ORDINANCE.
11:23:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
11:23:42 >>BILL CARLSON:
CONSIDERING WHAT HE SAID WHY WOULD YOU
WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS.
11:23:47 >> I DISCUSSED WITH THE CLIENT.
HE WANTS TO MOVE FORWARD.
WE ARE LOOKING AT IT CLOSER.
HE DOES WANT TO MOVE FORWARD BUT LOOKING AT IT CLOSER
FOLLOWING TODAY'S HEARING.
11:23:55 >>BILL CARLSON:
I KNOW.
MY QUESTION WAS, CONSIDERING THAT THERE IS -- WHAT DID
YOU CALL IT.
A PERMANENT TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT, WHY WOULD -- WHY
WOULD YOUR CLIENT WANT TO DO THIS -- CLOSE THIS IN THE
FIRST PLACE?
WHAT BENEFIT IS IT TO YOUR CLIENT TO CLOSE IT IF IT IS
STILL GOING TO BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS.
11:24:13 >> I UNDERSTAND.
I BELIEVE HE FEELS IT PROVIDES HIM MORE CONTROL OF
ELEMENTS THAT ARE A PROBLEM ALONG THE ALLEYWAY, WHICH
IS TRASH AND CRIME ISSUES.
11:24:27 >>BILL CARLSON:
WHEN THIS HAPPENS, DO YOU HAVE TO PAY
PROPERTY TAX ON IT TOO?
SO YOU HAVE --
11:24:33 >> THAT WOULD BE A RAMIFICATION, YES, SIR.
11:24:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO MAINTAIN
IT TOO.
11:24:38 >> THAT WOULD BE A RAMIFICATION, YES, SIR.
11:24:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
11:24:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I JUST -- ALONG MR. CARLSON'S --
AND I BELIEVE YOU ARE ONE OF THE FINEST PRESENTERS AND
YOU TELL IT DIRECT.
YOU DON'T HOLD ANYTHING OUT OR ANYTHING ELSE, BUT I
DIDN'T REALIZE THAT AT THE FIRST READING THE AMOUNT OF
INDIVIDUALS THAT WE WERE DISTURBING.
QUITE A FEW.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE HERE TODAY OR NOT.
AND THEN -- WHAT WAS JUST MENTIONED, WE ARE CLOSING A
PIECE OF PROPERTY NO MATTER WHERE IT IS AT AND LEAVING
IT OPEN JUST LIKE IT WAS BEFORE IT WAS CLOSED.
RIGHT?
11:25:16 >> THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, SIR, YES.
11:25:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I GET CONFUSE $ON LITTLE THINGS.
I AM REALLY CONFUSED ON THIS ONE.
11:25:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I AM ASKING WHAT IS THE POINT.
WHY GO THROUGH ALL OF THAT?
11:25:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO REFLECTION ON YOU, YOUR CLIENT
OR ANYONE ELSE, IF THIS GOES ON AND CLOSED, WHO CAN SAY
THAT LATER ON YOU CAN'T -- ANOTHER COUNCIL AND SAY WHY
DID THEY CLOSE THIS WHEN THEY PAID FOR IT AND CLOSE IT
AGAIN.
SO I JUST -- I AM NOT SPEAKING IN ANY WAY DEROGATORY
BUT OR YOUR CLIENT, BUT I JUST THINK THIS IS A WASTE OF
TIME OF YOUR CLIENT'S BEHALF TO SPEND THIS KIND OF
MONEY TO LEAVE IT THE SAME WAY IT IS.
THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO YOUR CLIENT BY CLOSING IT IF HE
IS GOING TO LEAVE IT OPEN.
LIKE SAYING I WANT TO GET MARRIED BUT I AM NOT GOING TO
MARRY YOU.
I MEAN, I AM JUST MAKING THAT UP REAL QUICK, BUT I
DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT.
OR I AM IN LOVE WITH YOU BUT I AM GOING TO MARRY
SOMEBODY ELSE.
11:26:14 >> YOU ARE SPEAKING VERY SWEETLY TO ME, COUNCILMAN.
11:26:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I AM NOT TRYING TO HUMOR ANYBODY,
BUT TRY TO PUT IT IN PERSPECTIVE.
11:26:21 >> THIS WAS DIRECTION I WAS GIVEN.
11:26:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
LIKE I SAID, I THINK YOU ARE ONE OF
THE FINEST ONES THAT DOES YOUR PRESENTATION AND YOU ARE
RIGHT WITH IT.
I UNDERSTAND OFF CLIENT ADVISING YOU HOW THEY WANT IT
DONE, BUT I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING.
THANK YOU.
11:26:36 >> I WILL TAKE THIS FEEDBACK BACK TO HIM.
MAKE SURE HE UNDER STANDS.
11:26:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
11:26:44 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
THIS WILL CHANGE THE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS PARCEL
AS WELL THEN.
ANY TIME OF LOITERING OR TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS OR ANYTHING,
THE CITY WILL NO LONGER BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.
11:26:59 >> WELL, DEFINITELY AFFECT THE FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP OF
THE ALLEYWAY.
REMAIN IN THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER.
IF THIS WAS TO BE VACATED TO THE CENTER LINE AND EACH
WILL GO TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, BUT ACCIDENTS
OR ANY KIND OF TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS, THEN IT
WILL STILL, IN ESSENCE, A TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT.
SO BEING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, THERE IS SOME EXPOSURE TO
THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
11:27:23 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
11:27:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN CITRO.
11:27:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MY NEXT QUESTION.
WHO IS THE LIABILITY FALL ON?
11:27:32 >> GENERALLY SPEAKING A COMBINATION OF -- I MEAN -- IT
WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO PREDICT WHAT A COURT OF LAW WILL
HOLD, BUT I WOULD SAY EVERYBODY WOULD BE INVOLVED IN
THE LITIGATION INCLUDING THE CITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS.
11:27:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT IS A LAWYER'S DREAM COME TRUE.
[LAUGHTER]
11:27:55 >> IF IT IS APPROPRIATE, IF I MAY, MR. SHELBY ADVISED
ME I SHOULD BE GOING OVER THE CRITERIA FOR YOU TO
CONSIDER IF YOU MAKE THE DECISION TO APPROVE OR
DISAPPROVE.
SOME OF THE FACTORS IS TO CONSIDER WHETHER THE VACATE
ALSO ALLEVIATE THE PUBLIC COST TO MAINTAIN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ALLEVIATE A PUBLIC NUISANCE DUMPING AND CURTAIL
CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
WHETHER IT WILL FOSTER REDEVELOPMENT OF THE ABUTTING
PROPERTIES.
AND WHETHER THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER'S PROCESS WILL
BE TOTALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY DIMINISHED.
11:28:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MR. PRESSMAN.
THANK YOU FOR INFORMATION FROM THE TPD REPORTS.
I WAS HOPING TO GET MORE INFORMATION ON -- AS YOU WERE
SAYING THE CRIME, THE DUMPING AND CRASH.
THAT IS WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR AND HOW I WAS GOING TO
BASE MY OPINION.
DO YOU HAVE ANY OF THOSE RECORDS?
I DON'T.
THE ONLY PUBLIC RECORD THAT I HAVE IS THE
TRANSPORTATION RECORDS SUBMITTED.
11:28:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THOSE PHOTOS AND THE ALLEY IS VERY
WELL CLEANED AND WELL MAINTAINED.
DO YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFICS OF THE DUMPING.
11:29:04 >> I CAN ONLY TELL YOU THE FEEDBACK FROM MY CLIENT, THE
PROPERTY OWNER, ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THAT HAS BEEN A PROBLEM.
11:29:12 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
11:29:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NOW GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
FEW PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE.
APPROACH THE LECTERN AND SAY YOUR NAME.
I KNOW YOU ARE SWORN IN, EVERYBODY STOOD UP AND RAISED
YOUR RIGHT HAND.
EVERYBODY HAS THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
11:29:31 >> THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBERS.
ERIC SHERIDAN.
PROPERTY OWNER AT THE MOODY BLUE TOWN HOMES.
I OWN THE PROPERTY ON THE CORNER NEXT TO THE ALLEYWAY.
A GENERAL ENGINEER AND LICENSED GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND
WORK PRESIDENT CONCRETE INDUSTRY AND I AM FAMILIAR WITH
TRANSPORTING LARGE TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES.
HOW I DO DISPLAY THIS ON THE SCREEN?
11:29:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THERE IT IS.
GO AHEAD.
11:29:59 >> YOU SEE IT.
SO OBVIOUSLY THIS IS OUR TOWN HOUSE COMMUNITY.
IN IS THE CAR WASH.
THIS IS THE AREA AND SUBJECT THAT WANTS TO BE VACANT.
UP UNTIL TODAY, WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT -- ABOUT THE
ORDINANCE OF STILL BEING ABLE TO USE THE ALLEYWAY.
UP UNTIL NOW, WE ASSUMED WE WEREN'T GOING TO STILL HAVE
ACCESS.
BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT HOWARD IS A ONE-WAY ROAD.
CLEVELAND IS A ONE-WAY ROAD.
OUR SURROUNDING ALLEYWAY AROUND OUR COMMUNITY IS
TWO-WAY TRAFFIC.
THIS ALLEY IS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC.
MOODY AVENUE IS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC WITH TANDEM PARKING.
THE VEHICLES -- THESE ARE APPROXIMATE.
THIS ALLEYWAY IS ONLY APPROXIMATELY 8.3 WIDE.
IN ALLEY IS ONLY EIGHT FOOT WIDE.
THIS ALLEY FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC IS 16 -- 15 FEET WIDE.
THERE WAS AN ILLUSTRATION THAT WAS PULLED, I BELIEVE,
BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE THAT SHOWED WASTE
MANAGEMENT.
HIS ILLUSTRATION WAS INCORRECT.
WASTE MANAGEMENT ACTUALLY TURNS RIGHT AND GOES DOWN TO
HOWARD.
THEY DON'T COME IN OFF OF HOW WAR AND TURN ONTO THE
VALLEY.
AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS ILLUSTRATION, THEY ARE MAKING
A RIGHT TURN AND THEY ARE ACTUALLY HAVING TROUBLE
MAKING THE TURN AND ENCROACHING ON THE PARKING LOT.
LOOKING AT THESE VIRTUALS, IN THE ALLEYWAY LOOKING
TOWARD MOODY AVENUE.
EIGHT-FOOT ROADWAY.
IN DARK AND SCARY AVENUE THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH BIG
BLOCK WALLS WAS ONLY INSTALLED RECENTLY BECAUSE I HAD
TO CALL THE CITY OF THE NOISE THIS CAR WASH WAS MAKING
AND THEY HAD TO LOWER THE DECIBELS AND THEY MADE THE
WALL TALLER.
HERE IS THE ILLUSTRATION OF THE ALLEYWAY GOING TO
HOWARD.
IT IS ABOUT 8 FOOT 3.
I UNDERSTAND THEY ARE SAYING WE WILL HAVE ACCESS
LONG-TERM.
THEY VACATE THIS, WE WILL HAVE ACCESS BUT WHAT HAPPENS
DOWN THE ROAD IF THEY DECIDE TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT
AS YOU GUYS ARE DISCUSSING.
A CAR PARKED DOWN HERE AND A CAR COMING DOWN THIS WAY
AND WE DON'T HAVE ACCESS.
BACK UP AN ALLEY THAT IS 200 FEET LONG?
EVERYBODY USES THIS ROAD.
THE COMMUNITY, PEOPLE ARE DRIVING AROUND THE CITY,
WASTE MANAGEMENT, AMAZON.
I DON'T SEE HOW THIS IS A BENEFIT FROM ANYBODY.
11:32:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
11:32:43 >> CONGRATULATIONS, WELCOME TO THE BOARD.
11:32:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NEXT SPEAKER.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
11:32:48 >> THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBERS.
BRANDY SAKAFOUS, I LIVE NEXT DOOR TO ERIC AND THE
BUILDING THAT DIRECTLY ABUTS THE ALLEY, ONE STANDPOINT
OVER.
TO ADDRESS THE TWO MAIN ISSUES OF CRIME AND TRASH.
I CAN TELL YOU LIVING DIRECTLY NEXT TO THE CAR WASH AND
THE PARKING LOT, THE MAJORITY OF THE TRASH COMES FROM
-- PIECES OF TRASH FLOWING OVER THE CAR WASH WALL.
THIS WEEK ON MONDAY PICKED UP A PIECE OF TRASH OUT OF
MY FRONT YARD AND PRESTIGE CAR WASH RECEIPT.
THE BIGGEST PIECE OF TRASH.
I TRIED TO PUT THIS DOWN HERE.
A BIG LARGE PIECE OF TRASH IN THE PARKING LOT.
A SIGN FROM THE CAR WASH.
AND CAR WASH AND OIL CHANGE, $18.99.
SIX-FOOT, EIGHT-FOOT SIGN THAT FELL DOWN AT THE CAR
WASH EVENTUALLY MADE ITS WAY TO THE PARKING LOT.
NO MAJOR SOURCE OF TRASH IN THE ALLEY.
A LOT OF TRASH IN THE PARKING LOT.
A LOT OF LOITERING IN THE PARKING LOT 12 A.M. SUNDAY, I
CALLED THE NONEMERGENCY TAMPA POLICE LINE BECAUSE
PEOPLE TAILGATING IN THE PARKING LOT BLARING MUSIC,
DRINKING AND SMOKING.
THAT IS AN OCCURRENCE EVERY MONTH OR TWO.
THE ALLEY ISN'T A SOURCE IN MY OPINION TRAFFIC, CRIME
AND TRASH.
IT IS THE DARK PARKING LOT -- THE PROPERTY OWNER CAN
INSTALL LIGHTS.
YOU KNOW, THAT IS WHERE PEOPLE ARE CONGREGATING.
NO THE ALLEY.
AS ERIC POINTED OUT.
I AM NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH IT.
HE HAS GOOD ILLUSTRATIONS.
THE ALLEY TURNING TO HOWARD WITH A REQUEST TO VACATE IS
A LITTLE BIT WIDER.
I WILL SHOW THE PROPORTION THAT IS PROPOSED TO REMAIN
OPEN.
THERE IS A TREE.
THERE IS AN UTILITY POLE.
THERE IS ANOTHER TREE MAKING IT MORE DIFFICULT TO MAKE
THAT LEFT-HAND TURN AND A LOT MORE NARROW THEN THE MORE
OPEN OPTION MAKING A RIGHT TO HOWARD WHICH IS WHY
LIKELY WASTE MANAGEMENT, MOST DELIVERY VEHICLES, YOU
KNOW, THE OTHER PIECE FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT, AGAIN,
THERE IS A TOTAL OF 16 PROPERTIES, EIGHT FRONTING THE
ALLEY THAT RUNS PERPENDICULAR TO THE VACATED ALLEY.
I LIVED THERE SINCE NOVEMBER 17, FOUR AND A HALF YEARS
I CAN'T REMEMBER THE SINGLE TIME IN -- IN THE FOUR
YEARS JUST ON A SINGLE HAND THAT I WOULD GO TO MOODY
AND MAKE A LEFT ON KENNEDY.
THAT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC SEEMS DANGEROUS.
I GO ON TO HOWARD TO MAKE A LEFT.
SAME THING TO ACCESS TO I-275 ANYTHING TO GET TO
MIDTOWN AND DALE MABRY.
GO TO HOWARD AND USE A TRAFFIC LIGHT FOR A
THOROUGHFARE.
I UNDERSTAND WE WILL USE IT FOR TRANSPORTATION
PURPOSES, BUT MY HISTORY WITH THE CAR WASH.
THE OWNER, THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
THEY HAVEN'T BEEN GREAT NEIGHBORS.
NO PLAN -- CHANGE OF USE BUT IF THEY EVER PLAN TO GO
JOIN THE PROPERTIES AND DO ANYTHING.
THEY HAVEN'T BEEN GREAT OF MAINTAINING THEIR PROPERTY.
I DON'T FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THEY WILL MAINTAIN THE
ALLEY.
11:35:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:35:55 >> THANKS FOR YOUR TIME.
11:35:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NEXT SPEAKER, STATE YOUR NAME.
11:36:03 >> MICHAEL PAHANIC, ANOTHER PROPERTY OWNER AND VICE
PRESIDENT OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
I ECHO WHAT THE OTHER SPEAKERS HAVE SAID BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SHOW THE PICTURES SHOWING THE TYPE OF NEIGHBOR WE
ARE DEALING WITH.
AND PEOPLE WHO ARE CLAIMING TRASH AND CRIME.
THIS IS JUST A DAILY EXAMPLE OF THE BUSINESS, THE LOT
THAT THEY HAVE THAT IS ADJACENT TO MY PROPERTY.
I LIVE ACROSS THE ALLEY ON THE FRONT SIDE.
THE MOODY SIDE.
THAT IS JUST THE OVERHEAD OF THE EYESORE OF EVERYTHING
IS.
THE DUMPSTER.
THIS IS ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE DUMPSTER.
THE TRASH IS PART OF THAT PROBLEM BECAUSE THEY THROW
EVERYTHING IN THAT DUMPSTER.
NOTHING IN BAGS.
NO CARE FOR IT.
EVERYTHING JUST BLOWS AROUND.
THIS IS THE AFOREMENTIONED CAR WASH WHICH -- WHERE IT
WAS ORIGINALLY WHICH IS A HALF A BLOCK AWAY IN THE
FRONT OF THEIR PROPERTY.
JUST THE TYPE OF CARE THEY TAKE CARE -- OR HOW THEY
TAKE CARE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
COUPLE MORE VISUALS HERE TO SHOW YOU WHAT WE ARE
LOOKING AT.
THE PEOPLE WHO WORRY ABOUT HOW THINGS APPEAR.
THE OTHER THING THAT -- I LIVE ON THE FRONT SIDE, THE
MOODY AVENUE SIDE, AND IT IS ALREADY -- A SMALL BLOCK.
TRYING TO DIVERT MORE TRAFFIC THERE.
IT IS JUST GOING TO BE MORE DANGEROUS.
AS BRANDY SAID, TRYING TO MAKE A LEFT ON KENNEDY OFF OF
MOODY IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
AND EVEN MAKING A RIGHT DURING RUSH SHOWER TO GET TO
HOWARD WHICH LEADS TO 270, -- 265, ANOTHER DIFFICULT
TASK.
LIMITS OUR ACCESS TO GO NORTH AND WEST.
AND IN ADDITION -- IF WE GO SOUTH, WE RUN INTO
CLEVELAND WHICH IS A ONE WAY WHICH RUNS INTO MACDILL
WHICH IS ANOTHER ONE WAY -- ARMENIA WHICH IS A ONE WAY.
WE ARE LIMITED WHERE WE CAN GO WITH THE GROWING
POPULATION AROUND THE AREA.
WE NEED MORE ACCESS TO THE ROAD, NOT CUTTING OFF ONE OF
OUR FEW WAYS TO GET THERE.
THANK YOU.
11:38:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANY PUBLIC SPEAKERS?
ONE REGISTERED, A SHELBIE ELLIOTT.
IS SHELBIE ELLIOTT --
11:38:15 >> HELLO, YES, THIS IS SHELBY.
CAN YOU HEAR ME.
11:38:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, BUT WE NEED FOR YOU TO TURN
ON YOUR CAMERA AND WE NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN.
ARE YOU ABLE TO TURN ON YOUR CAMERA?
11:38:26 >> LET'S SEE.
I THINK THAT I AM SHARING.
YES.
11:38:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THERE YOU ARE.
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.
[SWEARING IN]
11:38:37 >> I DO.
11:38:39 >>CLERK:
THANK YOU.
11:38:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
GO AHEAD.
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
11:38:46 >> I AM A PROPERTY OWNER AT THE MOODY BLUES TOWN HOMES
JUST ADJACENT -- THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORS
THAT JUST SPOKE.
AND I AM JUST COMMENTING AND OPPOSED TO THE -- TO THE
-- THE REQUEST.
I AM SO -- REALLY JUST ECHOING WHAT MY OTHER NEIGHBORS
HAVE MENTIONED.
THERE IS A SAFETY ISSUE IF THERE IS MORE TRAFFIC
DIRECTED ON TO MOODY ON THAT -- FROM THE ALLEY
CURRENTLY.
WE ALREADY HAVE ISSUES WITH SPEEDING CARS COMING FROM
KENNEDY DOWN TO CLEVELAND, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A VERY
NARROW STREET AS ERIC MENTIONED.
THAT TANDEM PARKING.
IF YOU HAVE A TRUCK COMING DOWN THIS STREET, USUALLY
ONE VEHICLE HAS TO STOP AND ALLOW ANOTHER VEHICLE TO
PASS DOWN THE STREET.
ALSO, I THINK ERIC WAS MENTIONING IF THERE ARE VEHICLES
THAT ARE TRAVELING NORTH FROM CLEVELAND IN THE ALLEY
WAY THAT -- I THINK IT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE -- TO
THE -- SECTION THAT IS THE REQUEST IS BEING MADE TO
VACATE IF THEY ARE GOING TO BACK UP, IF I CAN'T USE
THAT SECTION, THEY MAY NOT BACK IT UP ALL THE WAY FROM
THE ALLEY, ON TO THE -- THE DRIVEWAYS OF THOSE TOWN
HOMES THAT BACK UP TO THE ALLEY WHICH WE ARE IN THE
PROCESS OF REPAVING THAT.
SO I CAN POTENTIALLY SEE DAMAGE FROM ALL OF THE -- THE
VEHICLES.
SO WE ARE PLACING IN THAT AREA.
I -- I CAN SEE IT POTENTIALLY AFFECTING OUR PROPERTY
VALUES DEPENDING ON WHAT THE CAR WASH DOES WITH THAT --
WITH THAT PARKING LOT.
WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THOSE PLANS ARE.
AS EVERYONE MENTIONED THEY HAVEN'T BEEN GOOD NEIGHBORS.
I HAVE CONSTANTLY -- YOU KNOW, ON A WEEKLY BASIS, THERE
ARE TRASH RECEIPTS FROM THE CAR WASH EVEN ON THE FRONT.
ON THE MOODY AVENUE PROPERTIES.
AND AS BRANDY MENTIONED THE TRASH I HAVE THAT SEEN AND
THE PARKING LOT.
I NEVER HAD ISSUES GOING DOWN THAT ALLEY IF I WANTED TO
GO ACROSS THE STREET TO -- TO THE GAS STATION OR, YOU
KNOW, UTILIZE HOWARD.
I NEVER FELT IN DANGER.
I NEVER SEEN ANY TYPE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OCCURRING
THERE.
YOU KNOW THE EYESORE COMES FROM THE CAR WASH AND FROM
THAT PARKING LOT.
SO I THINK THAT IS -- THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO MY
COMMENTS.
11:41:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.
YES, MR. SHELBY.
11:41:43 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I THINK WE HAVE SOME EX-PARTE
COMMUNICATIONS BEFORE WE HEAD INTO THE REBUTTAL.
11:41:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF MAY, MR. CHAIR.
I AM HAVING MY AIDE PRINT THIS OUT.
I LITERALLY RIGHT NOW GOT A TEXT, WHICH I AM SENDING TO
MY AIDE FROM NICHOLAS STUCCO WITH TAMPA FIRE FIGHTERS
THAT READS AS FOLLOWS.
AND I AM GOING TO PRINT OUT COPY FOR ALL INTERESTED
PARTIES.
THAT IS WHY I STEPPED OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM.
MAY I READ IT.
11:42:09 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
PLEASE, THAT IS THE SUM AND
SUBSTANCE.
11:42:11 >>LUIS VIERA:
NOTHING ADVERSE.
GOOD MORNING, COMMA, ANY TIME ALLEYS WANT TO BE VACATED
FIRE MARSHAL SHOULD BE AWARE FOR APPROVAL AND DENIAL
BASED ON FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS BECAUSE ELIMINATING
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LADDER ACCESS.
WE ELIMINATE RE, WE LIMB -- RIGHT-OF-WAY, WE LIMIT.
I DISCLOSE IT BECAUSE A QUASI JUDICIAL MATTER.
11:42:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. CITRO.
11:42:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
RECEIVED THE SAME TEXT MESSAGES FROM
THE SAME PERSON.
I IMMEDIATELY DID A SCREEN SHOT AND SENT IT OFF TO MY
AIDE TO LEGAL.
11:42:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
GO TO THE CLERK.
11:42:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, WHICHEVER
YOU WANT TO ADVICE.
I WANT TO DISCLOSE THAT.
11:42:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND NOW.
11:42:56 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY.
IF I MAY, AGAIN, THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SENT IT I AM SURE
HAD NO ILL-WILL OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE BUT THE
PUBLIC, A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND WE MAY NOT HAVE
DISCUSSIONS WITH ANYONE OUTSIDE OF THAT WHICH IS MADE
PUBLIC ON THIS SPECIFIC MATTER WHICH IS WHY COUNCILMAN
CITRO AND I IMMEDIATELY DISCLOSED THIS WHEN I HAPPENED
TO SEE IT.
AND THERE IS MY WONDERFUL AID WITH THE DOCUMENT AND I
WILL GIVE TO ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE IT INCLUDING MR.
PRESSMAN.
11:43:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU HAD THE SAME MESSAGE.
11:43:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SAME MESSAGE.
TIM, IF YOU PRINT THAT OUT FOR ME SO I CAN HAND IT --
11:43:35 >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, SIR.
11:43:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
11:43:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:43:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I CAN JUST TELL YOU I WILL NEVER
GET A TEXT BECAUSE I DON'T BRING MY PHONE TO THE DAIS.
I AM JUST TELLING YOU, WHATEVER.
AND THAT WAY YOU TAKE ALL THE -- OUT OF ACTION.
NO REFLECTION ON NO ONE.
I AM NOT SAYING ANYTHING.
11:43:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IT'S EASY.
11:44:00 >>BILL CARLSON:
IF I RECEIVE TEXT OR E-MAIL, I AM NOT
AWARE OF IT.
BUT IF I DID, I WILL TURN IN WHEN WE GET OUT.
THANK YOU.
11:44:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF I CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST TO CAP
IT OFF BY SAYING TO THE PUBLIC -- PLEASE AS STATED BY
THE COUNCIL, DO NOT ATTEMPT TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE
CITY COUNCIL BY ELECTRONIC MEANS DURING -- DURING A
MEETING.
THE MEETING IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE IN THE SUNSHINE.
THANK YOU.
11:44:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT.
MR. PRESSMAN, DO YOU HAVE ANY FOLLOW-UP OR ANY
QUESTIONS FOR MR. PRESSMAN?
11:44:41 >> I WILL TAKE THE COMMENTS, PARTICULARLY THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT TO MY CLIENT, WE WILL DISCUSS IT AND I WILL
MAKE THE STAFF AND COUNSEL AWARE.
11:44:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
A MOTION TO CLOSE IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS?
11:44:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SO MOVED.
11:44:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
11:44:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION AND SECOND.
ITEM NUMBER 59, WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
WHERE DID WE LEAVE OFF.
DOES ANYBODY WISH TO TAKE A STAB OF IT.
11:45:16 >>CLERK:
MIRANDA WAS LAST.
11:45:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA?
11:45:19 >>LUIS VIERA:
NO, SIR.
FOR THE RECORD, I HAD -- JUST FOR THE RECORD GIVEN THAT
TEXT, I HAD NO COMMUNICATION WITH ANYONE ON THAT MATTER
OUTSIDE OF THAT WHICH HAS BEEN DISCLOSED JUST FOR THE
RECORD AGAIN.
I AM NOT JUST A ELECTED OFFICIAL BUT ALSO A MEMBER OF
THE FLORIDA BAR.
THANK YOU.
11:45:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WILL READ IT.
AGAIN, I CONCUR WITH COUNCILMAN.
I HAVE NO COMMUNICATION OUTSIDE OF IT BUT THE BASIS WHY
I AM GOING TO DENY IT AS EVERYONE ON THIS COUNCIL HAS
HEARD THAT IN MY OPINION, THE OBSTRUCTION -- EXCUSE ME
THE THINGS THAT WERE BEING SAID OF JUNK, TRASH, DEBRIS,
AND THOSE SORTS OF THINGS.
I DIDN'T SEE ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT EITHER WITH THE
POLICE REPORT, CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORTS, AND I DO NOT
FEEL IT IS NECESSARY TO CLOSE IT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
11:46:09 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIRMAN.
I WILL READ IT.
11:46:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU READ IT.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
11:46:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WANT TO BE CLEAR.
YOU ARE LOOKING FOR -- YOU ARE LOOKING -- YOU ARE GOING
TO READ THE ORDINANCE?
11:46:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I WILL READ IT BUT IF IT DOESN'T GET
A SECOND.
VAC-22-01.
ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING AND CONSIDERATION,
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, VACATING,
CLOSING, DISCONTINUING AND ABANDONING A RIGHT-OF-WAY,
ALLEYWAY LOCATED SOUTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD, NORTH OF
CLEVELAND STREET, EAST OF MOODY AVENUE AND WEST OF
HOWARD AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF OSCAWANA A SUBDIVISION
IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS
FULLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 HEREOF SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
COVENANTS CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS MORE
PARTICULARLY SET FORTH HERE IN.
PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS
PROVIDE FOR DEFINITIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
11:47:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IS THERE A SECOND?
IS THERE A SECOND?
YES, SIR.
11:47:15 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUST A REMINDER THAT THE MAKER OF THE
MOTION WOULD BE -- WOULD HAVE TO VOTE AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE YOU AWARE OF THAT, SIR?
I WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE --
11:47:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I WAS READING THE ORDINANCE TO SEE IF
IT GETS A SECOND.
IF IT DOESN'T GET A SECOND, IT DIES.
MANISCALCO NOONTIME SECTION.
THE MOTION IS DEAD.
DIES FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
DO WE HAVE ANOTHER MOTION?
THIS WOULD BE A MOTION FOR DENIAL.
11:47:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, I DON'T WANT TO BE
HERE UNTIL 8:00 AT NIGHT JUST LOOKING AT EACH OTHER, SO
I THINK THE COUNCIL FROM WHAT I SEE -- MR. GUDES SAID
IT -- NOT THAT HE WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR IT.
ONCE HE MADE THE MOTION HE HAS TO VOTE FOR IT.
THAT IS THE LAW.
YOU CAN SECOND THE MOTION AND -- BUT IF YOU MAKE THE
MOTION YOU HAVE TO APPROVE IT IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
JUST IN THE TIME OF SAFETY, I MOVE TO DENY ITEM 59,
VAC-22-01 BASED ON THE INFORMATION WE RECEIVED FROM THE
-- FROM THE DEPARTMENTS OF -- NO EVIDENCE THAT SAYS
THAT THE TRASH WAS GENERATED IN OTHER WAYS TO ANY
PREPONDERANCE THAT WE SAW DURING THE HEARING AND THAT
THE BENEFIT OF CLOSING THE ALLEY AND REMAINING OPEN AT
THE SAME TIME UNDER WHATEVER CONDITIONS WERE PROPOSED
IS NOT APPLICABLE OTHER THAN SOMEONE USING IT.
AND USE FOR GARBAGE, SANITATION PICK-UP, FOR EMERGENCY
CALLS AND OTHER THINGS ARE NEEDED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD,
AND, THEREFORE, I JUST DON'T FEEL IT IS THE RIGHT THING
TO DO TO MOVE THIS ALLEY AND MAKE IT PERSONAL TO DENY
THE RIGHTS OF THE USE OF THE OTHERS.
THIS ALLEY IS USED.
IT IS NOT AN ALLEY THAT IS DORMANT.
THIS ALLEY FROM THE INFORMATION WE RECEIVED AT THE
PUBLIC HEARING IS PREDOMINANTLY USED BY ALL.
AND IT IS NEEDED TO MOVE IN CASE OF FIRE, IN CASE OF --
EVEN IF POLICE WORK, THAT THEY HAVE TO USE THE ALLEY
AND IT IS AVAILABLE.
I MOVE TO DENIAL BASED ON THAT.
11:49:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECOND.
11:49:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM A COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
11:49:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
11:49:28 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
11:49:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
11:49:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
11:49:31 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
11:49:32 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
11:49:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
11:49:36 >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11:49:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT UP IS ITEM NUMBER 60.
WE HAVE AN E-MAIL FROM TIM JOHNSON REQUESTING TO BE
CONTINUED -- FOR THIS ITEM TO BE TENDS UNTIL APRIL 21.
ANYBODY HERE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THE CONTINUANCE,
JUST THE CONTINUANCE?
SEEING NONE.
AND I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED, DO I HAVE A MOTION
TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM UNTIL APRIL 21.
10 :30.
11:50:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
TIME SO IT IS CLEAR.
11:50:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
10:30.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ALL RIGHT, NUMBER 61 A MOTION -- WAS THERE A MOTION FOR
--
11:50:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SOMEONE HERE ON 61.
11:50:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A MOTION TO CONTINUE ON THIS OR
NO?
GO AHEAD, ROSS.
11:50:38 >> ROSS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WOULD LIKE THE CLERK TO SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN,
PLEASE.
11:50:51 >>CLERK:
ROSS, IT IS SHOWING THAT YOU ARE ALREADY A
PRESENTER.
11:51:00 >> OKAY.
11:51:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
GO AHEAD.
11:51:03 >> CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN NOW?
11:51:05 >> GO AHEAD.
11:51:09 >> LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION PROVIDING VAC-22-08.
THE APPLICATION IS WEST TAMPA HOLDINGS LCC.
A PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST TO VACATE THE UNAPPROVED
ALLEY SOUTH OF YUKON STREET, NORTH OF SUE WARD STREET,
EAST OF SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AVENUE AND WEST OF INTERSTATE
275.
CENTRAL AVENUE.
WITHIN THE PLAT OF IRVINTON HEIGHTS IN THE EAST TAMPA
ZONING DISTRICT.
APPLICANT OWNS A PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ALLEY
THAT IS REQUESTING TO BE VACATED.
THE APPLICANT'S REASON FOR THE APPLICATION IS ONLY TO
VACATE THE ALLEY.
THIS ALLEY IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
EXISTING CODE VIOLATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY AND FOR
ACCUMULATION OF OVERGROWTH.
21-03455.
THE APPLICANT IS ASKING TO VACATE THE ALLEY 8607 NORTH
SEMINOLE AVENUE.
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 4100 SQUARE FEET.
UNAPPROVED FOR ACCESS AND NOT ALLOWING USE FOR ABUTTING
OWNERS.
A TREE BLOCKS THE ALLEY.
SEVERAL UTILITIES UTILIZE THE ALLEY AND REQUIRE
EASEMENT REGULATIONS.
ALLEY DOES NOT CONTINUE NORTH.
THE ALLEY ORIGINALLY CONTINUED TO THE SOUTH BUT THE
ALLEY HAS BEEN VACATED.
OWNERS 8608 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE HAVE SENT AN E-MAIL
REQUESTING ACCESS TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND SAME
E-MAIL REGARDING CONCERN IS INCLUDED IN THE
PRESENTATION OF PHOTOS OF THE REAR OF THE PARCEL
SHOWING THEIR PARKING PAD.
THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY IS IN RED.
PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST IS IN YELLOW.
IT IS 275, CENTRAL AVENUE.
SEWARD.
AGAIN, THE ALLEYWAY IN PINK.
THIS IS THE ALLEYWAY WITHIN THE PLAT OF IRVINTON
HEIGHTS.
AGAIN, JUST SHOWING THE AREA WITHIN THE SECTION.
THIS IS THE ALLEYWAY LOOKING SOUTH OF YUKON STREET.
THE ALLEY IS NOT IMPROVED.
THAT IS THE ALLEY.
IN IS THE ALLEY LOOKING NORTH FROM SEWARD STREET.
IT APPEARS TO BE USING FOR MATERIALS FOR HOUSES
UNCONSTRUCTION.
THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S PARCEL LOOKING SOUTH.
NORTH AND SOUTH LOOKING NORTH ON DR. MARTIN LUTHER
KING, JR. IS NOT TO BE VACATED.
THIS IS, AGAIN, THE ALLEYWAY LOOKING SOUTH AT THE
PORTION OF THE ALLEY LINED 8608 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE,
WHICH IS THE HOUSE HERE.
AND THIS IS LOCATED ON THE ALLEYWAY BEHIND 8608 NORTH
CENTRAL AVENUE AND SHOWING THE PARKING PAD.
CONDITIONS ARE, STAFF HAD NO OBJECTION TO VACATING
BASED ON RESPONSES FROM THE REVIEWING AGENCY.
IF THE VACATING REQUEST APPROVED BY COUNCIL, EASEMENT
RESERVATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR WATER, WASTEWATER, TECO,
FRONTIER AND SPECTRUM.
MUST PAY TERMINATION FEES TO TECO FOR STREETLIGHT AND
MUST MEET FEE TOTALS AT PERMITTING RELATED TO CHAPTER
27 WITH REGARD TO TREE PRESERVATION AND SITE DESIGN.
AND THAT IS THE END OF MY SLIDE SHOW.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I AM AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT.
11:54:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
NO?
DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT?
ARE YOU MR. QUINONES?
11:55:07 >> YES.
11:55:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COME ON UP.
URN SWORN IN.
YOU RAISED YOUR RIGHT HAND.
SO YOU ARE GOOD.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
11:55:17 >> YES.
SO --
11:55:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
STATE YOUR NAME.
11:55:25 >> JUAN QUINONES, THE APPLICANT.
WE ARE WANTING TO -- FOR THE SAME REASON OVER AT ROME.
THE ALLEY WE WANT TO VACATE IT AND KEEP IT SIMPLE FOR
OUR PROPERTY AND OUR NEIGHBORS' PROPERTIES.
AND CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE AREA BASICALLY.
THE ALLEYS BEING VACATED THROUGHOUT -- IN THAT SAME
AREA.
11:55:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK
ON THIS ITEM?
YES, PLEASE COME FORWARD AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE
MINUTES EACH TO SPEAK.
11:56:03 >> GOOD MORNING.
11:56:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
GOOD MORNING, PLEASE STATE YOUR
NAME.
11:56:09 >> ALFREDO GUADELUP, AND I AM BACKED UP TO THE
PROPERTY THAT WAS JUST DEVELOPED THERE.
AND MY PROBLEM IS, I WAS TRYING TO GET THAT ALLEY IN
THERE AND I APPRECIATE THE CITY CLEANING IT EVERY TIME
I CALLED.
AND I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT.
[ENCODER DROP]
AND HE WAS CHASING THEM AWAY SO THEY WERE COMING AND THEY
WERE KICKING THE FENCE DOWN.
SO THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE ALLEY.
SO I JUST WANTED TO STATE THAT.
AND THESE GENTLEMEN HERE ALSO IN THE SAME POSITION.
11:57:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
11:57:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE THE NEXT SPEAKER
COMES, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ADVISE THE NEIGHBORS, THE
PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO IN CASE THE ALLEY
IS CLOSED.
THERE WAS SOME FOUR OR FIVE ITEMS CAME UP.
ONE THAT CAUGHT MY EYE WAS TECO FOR CLOSING UP SOME LIGHT
THAT THEY HAVE OR SOMETHING.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THEY KNOW WHAT THE COST IS.
I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OTHER MEMBER KNOWS WHAT THAT IS.
IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS BROUGHT UP BY THE CITY, MAKING THE
PRESENTATION, AND IT WAS HERE, FOUR OR FIVE ITEMS, I DIDN'T
HAVE TIME TO MEMORIZE THEM ALL.
HERE IT IS.
TECO.
YOU HAVE TO GET PERMISSION FOR THE WATER, WASTEWATER LINE TO
BE CLEANED, AND THAT'S NATURE.
BUT THE ONE THAT CAUGHT MY EYE WAS TERMINATION FEE TO TECO
FOR STREETLIGHTS, WHATEVER THAT IS.
I DON'T KNOW.
THAT'S WHAT I AM ASKING THE CITY, IF SOMEBODY CAN MAKE
PRIORITY, UNLESS THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT THESE POLES HERE.
I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.
AND THE AMOUNT OF DOLLARS.
I WANT TO KNOW AND YOU ARE GOING TO FIND OUT RIGHT NOW.
11:59:10 >>RON WIGGINTON:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
AS FAR AS THE STREETLIGHT TERMINATION FEES, THIS IS
CURRENTLY IN OUR ALLEYWAY.
CITY OF TAMPA PAYS FOR THAT CONNECTION AND COST.
HOWEVER, IT'S BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT THE
APPLICANT AND TECO MADE AN ARRANGEMENT TO TERMINATE THAT
SERVICE AND TO PAY FOR THE TERMINATION FEE.
I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE COST OR THE ARRANGEMENT.
11:59:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WANT THE PARTIES TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS
HAPPENING.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
11:59:35 >>RON WIGGINTON:
INDEED.
11:59:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NEXT SPEAKER.
11:59:38 >> MY NAME IS RALPH KREPPS.
MY WIFE AND I OWN PROPERTY AT 8608 NORTH CENTRAL.
WE RECEIVED A LETTER IN THE MAIL ABOUT THE PROPOSAL TO CLOSE
THE ALLEYWAY.
WE DO HAVE A PARKING SPACE BACK THERE.
SO IF WE TAKE THE ALLEYWAY AWAY, I LOSE THAT PARKING SPACE.
THAT'S THE ONLY ISSUE WE HAVE FOR THAT.
11:59:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
12:00:00 >> THANK YOU, SIR.
APPRECIATE IT.
12:00:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
12:00:09 >> WHEN I CALLED THE CITY, IF I HAD KNOWN THAT -- DO YOU
UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING?
THERE'S NO WAY TO FIND THE THING OUT THERE AND THANK YOU
VERY MUCH FOR BRINGING THAT UP.
BECAUSE I JUST LEARNED SOMETHING.
AND I DON'T MIND, YOU KNOW, BEING -- I WOULD JUST LIKE TO
GET THAT CLEANED OUT AND SAFETY FOR MY GRANDKIDS.
12:00:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT.
WE GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT.
SIR, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD BEFORE WE CLOSE?
YES?
NO?
IF YOU ARE GOOD, YOU ARE GOOD.
OKAY.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
NO QUESTIONS.
THERE'S NO ONE REGISTERED FOR THIS.
SO I BELIEVE THAT'S IT.
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN
MIRANDA.
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT.
WHO WISHES TO READ ITEM NUMBER 61?
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO READ 61?
THIS IS TO VACATE THE ALLEY.
12:01:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
LET ME READ IT.
ITEM NUMBER 61.
12:01:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
61, 61.
12:01:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES, I'M SORRY.
ITEM NUMBER 61, FILE VAC 22-08.
IT'S AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA VACATING, CLOSING,
DISCONTINUING, ABANDONING A RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALLEYWAY LOCATED
SOUTH OF YUKON, NORTH OF SEWARD STREET, EAST OF SMALL AVENUE
WEST OF INTERSTATE 275 CENTRAL AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF
IRVITON HEIGHTS, A SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 HEREOF SUBJECT TO CERTAIN COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH HEREIN
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR ENFORCEMENT AND
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS,
INTERPRETATIONS AND REPEALING CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
12:02:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MEMBER CITRO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
12:02:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
12:02:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
12:02:25 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
12:02:27 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
12:02:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
12:02:29 >>LUIS VIERA:
NO.
12:02:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
12:02:32 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2022 AT
9:30 A.M.
12:02:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITEM NUMBER 63?
MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES AND CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE IN RECESS UNTIL 1:30.
(CITY COUNCIL IN RECESS).
13:34:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I CALL THE MEETING BACK TO ORDER.
ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
13:39:32 >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
13:39:34 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
13:39:35 >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
13:39:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
13:39:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
13:39:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
13:39:41 >>THE CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
13:39:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
13:39:43 >> THANK YOU FOR MOVING UP THE ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE.
REALLY ON BEHALF OF THE ADMINISTRATION I WANT TO COMMEND AND
WELCOME OUR NEW COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK, AND REALLY LOOKING
FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU.
I JUST WANT TO TAKE THIS POINT OF PRIVILEGE ON THAT UPDATE
SINCE WE DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE ON THE AGENDA AND
CONGRATULATE YOU ON YOUR POSITION AND LOOKING FORWARD TO
SERVING WITH YOU.
THAT'S ALL.
THANK YOU.
13:40:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE WILL GO TO ITEM NUMBER 63.
WE DO HAVE TO SWEAR EVERYBODY IN, CORRECT, ON THIS ONE OR
NOT?
13:40:28 >>THE CLERK:
YES.
13:40:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY HERE FOR 63 AND OF 4, PLEASE
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN, IF YOU ARE
GOING TO BE SPEAKING.
OH, MOTION TO OPEN 63 AND 64 BY CITRO, SECOND FROM
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THE TWO CASES ARE OPEN.
GO AHEAD.
(OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
13:40:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
13:40:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF I CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE YOU BEGIN,
I BELIEVE WE ARE GOING TO ITEM NUMBER 63 WHICH IS
DE-1-22-95.
13:41:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR.
13:41:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND 2707 WEST FIG STREET.
COUNCIL, AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU RECEIVE AND FILE
ANY EX PARTE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE FLORIDA
STATUTE 286.0115 AND IF YOU HAD ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION
VERBALLY, THAT YOU PLEASE DISCLOSE THEM AT THE START OF THE
HEARING.
THAT BEING SAID, MOTION AND SECOND, PLEASE.
TO RECEIVE AND FILE ANY WRITTEN EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
RELATIVE TO THIS HEARING.
13:41:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY?
MOTION?
COUNCILMAN CITRO, THANK YOU.
ANY OPPOSED?
13:41:48 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
ITEM NUMBER 63 IS A PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS FILED BY
THE PETITIONER JOSEPH GLOGER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2707
WEST FIG STREET.
THE PETITIONER FILED A REQUEST FOR A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO
ALLOW VEHICLE ACCESS TO THE STREET IN LIEU OF ACCESS TO THE
ALLEY IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.
STAFF DENIED THE APPLICATION REQUEST ON JANUARY 27th OF
2022.
THE BASIS THAT THE APPLICATION DID NOT MEET THE CODE
SECTIONS WHICH IS 27-241, SUBSECTION 2-C-5 AND ALSO CODE
SECTION 27-60 WHICH IS THE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN EXCEPTION.
I PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED MR. SHELBY A COPY WHICH YOU GUYS WERE
PROVIDED COPIES OF THE RELEVANT CODE SECTIONS, SAMPLE
MOTIONS AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
THE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IS A
DE NOVO REVIEW ACCORDING TO CODE SECTION 2nd 27-161
SUBSECTION J-2.
THAT CODE SECTION MEANS THAT THIS CITY COUNCIL CAN ACCEPT
NEW EVIDENCE, TAKE PUBLIC TESTIMONY, AND MAKE YOUR OWN
DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT THIS APPLICATION MEATS THE
CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN CODE SECTION 27-241 SUBSECTION 2-C-5
AND CODE SECTION 27-60.
STAFF SHOULD BE PRESENT TO PROVIDE THE STAFF ANALYSIS AND
THE DECISION THAT WAS MADE IN THIS CASE, AND THAT STAFF IS
ANDY MIKULSKI.
AFTER CITY COUNCIL HEARS FROM STAFF AND THE PETITIONER FOR
THIS CASE, CITY COUNCIL CAN TAKE A COUPLE OF ACTIONS.
THOSE ACTIONS ARE TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR AND VERIFY, DENY THE REQUEST FOR THE DESIGN
EXCEPTION, OR CITY COUNCIL CAN OVERTURN THE DECISION OF THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND THEREBY GRANT THE DESIGN EXCEPTION.
WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MR. MIKULSKI WHO WILL BE
SWORN IN IF HE HASN'T ALREADY BEEN SWORN IN.
13:44:02 >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
CAN EVERYONE HEAR ME?
13:44:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WERE YOU SWORN IN, SIR?
13:44:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NO.
I NEED --
13:44:10 >> NO.
I NEED TO BE SWORN IN.
13:44:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
(OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
13:44:15 >> MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
OKAY, CAN EVERYONE SEE THE PowerPoint?
13:44:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN BUT NO
PowerPoint YET.
OKAY, WE CAN SEE THE PowerPoint.
IF YOU JUST MAKE IT BIGGER.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
13:44:46 >> JUST A MOMENT, LET ME -- NOW CAN YOU SEE IT FULL SCREEN?
13:44:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, PEST.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
13:44:54 >> ALL RIGHT.
THIS IS DE 1-22-95.
THE APPLICANT IN THE AGENDA IS JOSEPH GLOGER, PROPERTY
ADDRESS 2707 WEST FIG STREET WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE STREET IN LIEU OF
ACCESS TO THE ALLEY.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN RED.
THIS IS THE STANDARD FOR REVIEW 27-60.
I WILL GO TO THE FINDINGS.
WE FOUND IT INCONSISTENT.
RELEVANT CODE SECTION IS OPEN USE PUBLIC ALLEY, VEHICLE
ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE ALLEY AS A
PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT PROVIDED IT MEETS THE MINIMUM
STANDARDS REFERENCE TO 27-383.12.
AND THE FOLLOWING SLIDE IS THE CRITERIA WHY WE DENIED THE
APPLICATION.
THE FIRST IS THAT EXCEPTION EITHER INTERFERES WITH THE
RIGHTS OF OTHERS, OR IS INJURIOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH,
SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND MY COMMENTS ARE IN ITALICS, SO I
KNOW YOU GUYS HAVE PROBABLY BEEN MADE AWARE RECENTLY OF THE
NEW DRIVEWAYS IN WEST TAMPA, AND IT'S NOT A TREND THAT'S
CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVAILING HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PATTERN,
AND IT'S NOT IDEAL FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AS IT INCREASE IT
IS NUMBER AND SIZE OF CONFLICT POINTS ON SIDEWALKS, AND IT
ALSO INTERFERES WITH ON-STREET PARKING OPPORTUNITIES, AS YOU
HAVE THE DRIVEWAYS ESPECIALLY DOUBLE CAR WIDTH DRIVEWAYS
EATING UP A LOT OF THAT CURB SPATES THAT ELIMINATES THE
OPPORTUNITY FOR ON-STREET PARKING.
THE SECOND ITEM, THE EXCEPTION MINIMUM POSSIBLE, THE ALLEY
IS PAVED AND USABLE, AND THERE IS NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT IT
THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO APPROVE THE DESIGN EXCEPTION.
NUMBER 3 IS THE APPROVAL EXCEPTION OF STANDARDS, APPROVAL TO
ENSURE THE JUDGMENT DOES NOT GUARANTEE SPECIAL PRIVILEGES.
SO THE BUILDING PERMIT WHICH HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR SINCE THE
WEST TAMPA CODE, ALLEYWAY CODE WAS CHANGED, TAMPA HAD
COMPLIED WITH THE ALLEY REQUIREMENTS.
AND I WILL GO INTO THAT IN THE NEXT SLIDE.
THERE ARE SOME BUILDING PERMITS THAT WE DID APPROVE, DID NOT
USE THE ALLEY BECAUSE THOSE ARE DETERMINED TO BE NONUSABLE.
CITY COUNCIL HAS OVERTURNED A COUPLE -- ONE OF THESE IN THE
PAST, AND SOME OF THESE WERE ALSO EXISTING PERMIT
APPLICATIONS THAT WERE AND BEFORE THE CODE WAS CHANGED SO
HAD TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE OLD DESIGN.
AND FINAL ITEM, THE EXCEPTION IS THE CONSISTENT WITH ANY
APPLICABLE SPECIFIC PLANS.
AGAIN, THE OVERLAY IS TO ENSURE THAT ALL TYPES OF NEW
DEVELOPMENTS AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS ARE AVAILABLE WITH THE
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL ORIENTATION DESIGN ELEMENTS, LOT
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER SPECIAL RELATIONSHIPS
WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA AREA.
SO PROMINENT FORWARD FACING GARAGES ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH
THE HISTORIC PATTERN OF WEST TAMPA WHICH IS THE CODE CHANGE
BEGAN WITH.
HERE IS THE PERMITS THAT WERE APPLIED FOR IN WEST TAMPA FROM
ABOUT THE TIME THE CODE WAS CHANGED, THE ALLEYWAY CODE
REQUIREMENT.
THIS IS ABOUT FEBRUARY OF 2021.
SO THESE ARE THE PERMITS FROM 2021, FEBRUARY 2021 TO
DECEMBER 2021.
SO THERE HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE 43, THERE HAVE BEEN 19 THAT
HAVE MET THE ALLEYWAY REQUIREMENTS.
AND I WILL GO TO SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE.
HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
2707 WEST FIG.
THE ALLEYWAY IS IN THE REAR BEHIND THAT WOODEN FENCE.
SO THE ALLEY IS -- THERE IS AN ALLEYWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY SOME 14
TO 15 FEET, RIGHT-OF-WAY, PAVEMENT IS ABOUT 9 FEET WIDE BUT
IN AREAS IT'S -- AS FAR AS ALLEYS IN TAMPA GO, THIS IS
ACTUALLY PRETTY GOOD.
SO HERE IS THE ENTRANCE OF THE ALLEY ON THE WEST.
AND THE PHOTO ON THE RIGHT -- I APOLOGIZE.
THE PHOTO ON THE LEFT IS THE ENTRANCE OF THE ALLEY.
PHOTO ON RIGHT IS ABOUT HALFWAY DOWN.
AND THEN THE PHOTO ON THE RIGHT OF THIS SCREEN IS THE
EASTERN EDGE OF THE ALLEY LOOKING BACK TO THE WEST.
AND THE PHOTO ON THE LEFT, THIS IS A NEWER HOME THAT WAS
APPROVED, AND YOU CAN SEE KIND OF THAT NOTCH CUT OUT ON THE
FENCE ON THE LEFT WHERE THERE IS REQUIRED VISITOR SPOT, SO
THIS IS A NEW BUILDING, AND IN ORDER TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS THEY PROPOSED USING THE ALLEY FOR VEHICLE
ACCESS.
AND I WILL SHOW YOU THAT HERE.
THAT'S 2704 WEST GRAY WHICH IS IN YELLOW TO THE RIGHT OF THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
AND HERE IS A BUILDING PLAN, AND YOU CAN SEE GUEST PARKING
IS BEING MET ON THE ALLEY.
THIS WAS AGAIN BEFORE THEY WERE REQUIRED TO USE THE ALLEY
FOR VEHICLE ACCESS.
HOWEVER, SO THEY THE DRIVEWAYS UP FRONT, THEY DETERMINED IN
THIS CASE THAT THE ALLEY MET -- THEY WERE ABLE TO USE TO THE
MEET THEIR -- TO MEET THEIR VEHICLE SPOT, GUEST-REQUIRED
SPOT.
AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
13:50:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
ALL RIGHT.
SEEING NONE, THE APPLICANT.
13:50:48 >> I WILL STOP SHARING MY SCREEN AT THIS MOMENT.
13:50:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THE APPLICANT HAS 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT.
AND THEN WE'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS AFTER.
13:50:58 >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
I BOUGHT THIS HOUSE IN 2017.
13:51:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
13:51:04 >> JOSEPH GLOGER.
I BOUGHT THIS HOUSE IN 2017, HAD A DRIVEWAY, I HAD A
CARPORT, AND I HAD EVERY INTENTION TO TEAR THIS HOUSE DOWN
TO BUILD A NEW -- A TINY TWO-ONE.
THIS NEW RULE CHANGE HAPPENED FEBRUARY OF 2021 WITH ZERO
NOTICE TO THE COMMUNITY.
I GOT NO LETTER THAT THIS WAS EVEN HAPPENING.
BUT FOR ME TO DO A DESIGN EXCEPTION, I HAVE TO GO TO THE
PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE, SEND OUT ALL THESE CERTIFIED
LETTERS, THAT I HAVE TO SIGN, BUT I GOT NO NOTICE THAT THIS
WAS HAPPENING.
I HAD THE HORSE TORN DOWN, AND NOW AN EMPTY LOT WITH NO
HOUSE ON IT, AND THIS LOT IS ONLY 70 FEET DEEP.
A GARAGE IS TYPICALLY 22 FEET.
I NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE A BACKYARD?
I WILL BE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS ALLEY THAT HAS TO USE IT.
EVERY SINGLE HOUSE -- EVERY SINGLE HOUSE, 2701, GARAGE
DRIVEWAY.
DRIVEWAY.
THIS IS THE NEW HOUSE RIGHT NEXT TO MY LOT.
GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY.
DRIVEWAY.
DRIVEWAY.
HOUSES ON GRAY.
GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY.
GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY.
GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY.
GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY.
AND THEN THESE ARE FOUR TOWNHOMES BUILT ON GRAY.
GARAGES.
I WILL BE THE ONLY HOUSE THAT HAS TO DRIVE DOWN AND MAINTAIN
THE WHOLE ALLEY.
HE SAID IT'S A DRIVABLE ALLEY.
I HAVE MEASURED AT 9 FEET IN SOME SPOTS.
MY TRUCK IS 8 FEET WIDE.
HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO MAKE A 90º TURN TO A GARAGE?
THEY SAY THAT'S PAVED.
YEAH, PAVED 40 YEARS AGO THAT NOW IT'S NOT REALLY DRIVABLE.
CAN YOU DRIVE ON IT?
YEAH, BUT YOU HAVE NO ROOM.
SOMEONE DUMPS SOMETHING DOWN THE ALLEY, WHICH IS CONSTANT,
THERE'S DEBRIS EVERYWHERE, SO NOW I HAVE TO GET OUT OF MY
CAR TO MOVE THIS DEBRIS AND WHERE DO I PUT IT?
I'M A FIREFIGHTER.
I AM GONE 24-48 HOURS AT A TIME.
I DO NOT FEEL SAFE WITH MY WIFE WITH ONLY TWO MEANS OF
EGRESS.
ONE OF THEM CAN BE BLOCKED BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE DUMPING
MATTRESSES.
THAT WAS A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO.
YEAH, IT'S JUST A TINY CHAIR, BUT WHEN YOU HAVE A BIG
VEHICLE, HOW DO YOU HAVE ROOM TO GET OUT OF YOUR CAR TO MOVE
THAT CHAIR?
MY WIFE GOES TO WORK AT SIX IN THE MORNING, PITCH BLACK.
WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE WITH YOUR DRIVING DOWN THAT ALLEY
EARLY IN THE MORNING?
I TALKED TO ONE NEIGHBOR.
HE SAID TWO BLOCKS BACK PEOPLE SENT UP A TENT CAMP IN THE
ALLEY.
I HAVE GOT TO WORRY ABOUT THAT NOW WHEN I AM GONE FOR 24-48
HOURS?
THIS IS SUPPOSED TO HELP WITH PARKING ON THE STREET.
GIVEN THE ONLY TWO SPOTS IT'S A 4 TO 5 BEDROOM HOUSE, WHEN
MY DAUGHTER GETS OLDER, WHERE IS HER CAR GOING TO GO?
WITH ONLY TWO SPOTS SHE'S GOING TO BE PARKING ON THE STREET.
WHEN I HAVE FAMILY, MY WIFE'S MOM IS ABOUT TO RETIRE, LIVES
IN ST. LOUIS, AND SPENDING MONTHS DOWN HERE AT A TIME,
BECAUSE WE JUST HAD A BABY.
WHERE IS SHE GOING TO PARK?
HAS TO PARK ON THE STREET.
MY TRUCK HAS TO GO ON THE STREET.
THIS IS GOING TO ADD MORE CLUTTER ON THE STREET.
I THINK ONLY ONE HOUSE HAS A PIECE OF SIDEWALK.
THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS.
SO THERE WOULD BE NO SIDEWALK I'M BLOCKING.
I THINK TO PUT A SIDEWALK AND WON'T BE BLOCKED.
IT'S A HUGE SAFETY CONCERN KNOWING THAT MY WIFE WOULD HAVE
TO GET HER GROCERIES OUT IN THIS ALLEY, WALK TO THE FRONT OF
THE HOUSE.
I MEAN, I AM AT FIRE STATION 3 AT KENNEDY AND WILL O.I HAVE
SEEN SOME CRAZY THINGS HAPPEN IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS.
AND I DON'T WANT MY WIFE TO HAVE TO DRIVE DOWN AND USE THE
ALLEY.
I MEAN, I JUST THINK THAT HAVING TWO MEANS OF EGRESS IS JUST
ASININE.
AND PEOPLE CLAIM THAT FIRE, POLICE USE THESE ALLEYS.
I HAVE GOT 9 FEET.
EVEN IT IS 10 TO IS THE 12, FIRE TRUCKS CAN'T GET DOWN
THERE.
BULANCES CAN'T GET DOWN THERE.
WE NEED THE FRONT ACCESS TO OUR HOME.
THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
13:56:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
HEARING NONE, WE HAVE ONE REGISTERED PERSON FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT.
IF SANDY SANCHEZ, I BELIEVE, YES, SANDY SANCHEZ IS ON,
PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF AND ACTIVATE YOUR CAMERA SO WE CAN
SEE YOUR FACE.
13:56:38 >> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
13:56:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, MA'AM.
CAN YOU TURN YOUR CAMERA ON?
13:56:50 >> MY CAMERA IS SHOWING ME.
13:56:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
LET'S CHANGE THE SCREENS HERE.
YES, MA'AM.
13:56:55 >> OKAY?
13:56:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN ONCE YOUR
CAMERA COMES ON.
IS IT ON?
13:57:04 >> CAN YOU SEE ME NOW?
13:57:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, WE CAN.
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAPPENED AND WE ARE GOING TO SWEAR
YOU IN.
(OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
13:57:19 >> I DO.
13:57:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
13:57:26 >> MY NAME IS SANDY SANCHEZ, I LIVE AT 2750 FIG STREET RIGHT
NEXT DOOR.
BUT BEFORE I BEGIN, CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO AND COUNCIL MEMBERS,
I WAS NOT SCHEDULED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM UNTIL THE LAST
MINUTE.
MR. CARLSON HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY TO REWORK SOME OF
THE SEMANTICS AND FIX THE OVERLAY, WAS CALLED OUT ON A
PERSONAL EMERGENCY, SO I WOULD REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL MINUTE,
IF I NEED IT, PLEASE.
13:57:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY.
ALL IN FAVOR?
GO AHEAD.
13:58:05 >> AGAIN MY NAME IS SANDY SANCHEZ, THE PRESIDENT OF THE
ARMWOOD GARDENS CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMITTEE OF THE WEST TAMPA CRA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE,
AND WORKING ON THE EXISTING WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
FIRST LET ME EXPLAIN THAT IN APRIL 2021, I PERSONALLY SPOKE
TO THE APPLICANT AND EXPLAINED THE CHANGES IN THE WEST TAMPA
OVERLAY.
I KNEW HE WAS GETTING READY TO TEAR DOWN THIS HOUSE, SO I
WANTED TO MAKE HIM AWARE OF THE GUIDELINES BEFORE HE
SUBMITTED HIS PLANS.
SO LET ME MAKE THAT VERY CLEAR.
THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CHANGES TO THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
WERE TO MAKE OUR STREETS SAFER FOR ALL USERS, ESPECIALLY OUR
VULNERABLE POPULATION, ELDERLY, HANDICAPPED, ET CETERA.
SAFETY BETWEEN THE PEDESTRIANS AND THE VEHICLES.
CARS PARK ON THE STREET.
PEDESTRIANS AND WHEELCHAIR USERS IN THE STREET WERE PRONE TO
BE HIT BY A CAR DRIVING BY.
THE MAJORITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
HAVE NO SIDEWALKS.
THE CHANGES, THE WEST TAMPA CRA AND CITIZENS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, ARE CONTINUALLY WORKING WITH THE CITY STAFF TO
EXPAND THE LANGUAGE AND PROVIDE OTHER SOLUTIONS SINCE WE
REALIZED ONE SIZE FITS ALL SOLUTION IS NOT PRACTICAL.
WE ARE LOOKING AT ALLEY WIDTHS, CONDITIONS, DRAINAGE
REQUIREMENT, IMPROVEMENTS OF ALLEY REQUIREMENTS, THESE
FACTORS AFFECT THE ABILITY FOR A VEHICLE TO USE THEM.
I HAVE LIVED NEXT DOOR TO THE APPLICANT.
THEY HAVE AN ALLEY THAT IS WIDE ENOUGH, CLEAR ENOUGH,
ALREADY IMPROVED, AND IS KEPT CLEAN BY MYSELF.
I PAY TO HAVE THAT ALLEY CLEANED ABOUT EVERY SIX WEEKS.
THE LOCATION IS A PRIME EXAMPLE WHEREOF WE SHOULD HAVE
ALLEYS ACCESS.
MR. MIKULSKI'S URBAN PLANNING REPORT, THE ALLEYWAY IS USABLE
AND THERE IS NO RESTRAINT OF USING THE ALLEY.
UNQUOTE.
THERE ARE OTHER NEW HOUSES ON THE BLOCK OF FIG STREET RIGHT
ACROSS THE STREET FROM US.
THERE ARE THREE TOWNHOMES BEING BUILT ACROSS THE STREET.
BEFORE THEY BEGAN TO BUILD, THEY REVISED THE PLANS TO MEET
THE OVERLAY AND PROVIDE ALLEY ACCESS FOR ALL THREE
TOWNHOMES.
AT 2701 WEST FIG, WHICH IS TO THE EAST OF US, THE PROPERTY
DIRECTLY TO THE EAST HAS RECENTLY BEEN MURDER AND THE
ORIGINAL HOME HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND THE LOTS HAVE BEEN
SPLIT.
THEY WERE ALSO REQUIRED IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY TO PROVIDE
ALLEY ACCESS TO PARKING AS AGAIN THIS ALLEY IS WIDE ENOUGH,
CLEAR ENOUGH, AND ALREADY IMPROVED FOR VEHICLE USE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PETITIONER WILL NOT BE THE ONLY ONE ON
THE BLOCK WITH ALLEY ACCESS.
THERE ARE SIX NEW HOMES AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
ON THIS BLOCK, ALL WITH EASY ACCESS TO ALLEYS THAT FALL
WITHIN THE CRITERIA OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
REMEMBER, ORIGINALLY ALL THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY, WE ASK THAT
YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE OVERLAY AND VOTE AGAINST THIS
DESIGN EXCEPTION.
AND AS I QUOTE AGAIN FROM URBAN PLANNING, THE EXISTING ALLEY
IS PAVED, USABLE AND THERE IS NO UNIQUE SITE CONSTRAINT
PREVENTING THE USE OF THE ALLEY.
PLEASE VOTE TO KEEP THE EXISTING RULING INTACT AND DENY THIS
EXCEPTION.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
14:01:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC?
THAT WAS THE ONLY REGISTERED PUBLIC COMMENT, INDIVIDUAL.
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC?
14:01:51 >> DO I GET TO TALK?
14:01:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL AT THIS
TIME?
IF NOT, IF THERE'S ANY ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENT.
NO?
YOU DO HAVE FIVE MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL.
14:02:03 >> SO THAT'S SANDY'S HOME. IN 2018 SHE GOT A DESIGN
EXCEPTION, ZERO PROPERTY LINE CARPORT THAT SHE SAID SHE
WANTED IN HER LETTER TO THE CITY TO BE ABLE TO PARK IN THE
DRIVEWAY AND THE CARPORT SO SHE CAN WALK TO HER FRONT DOOR.
NOW SHE'S SAYING I HAVE TO USE THE ALLEY?
I JUST SHOWED YOU ALL THE HOUSES THAT ARE ALREADY ON, THEY
ALL HAVE GARAGES.
AND THE LETTERS SENT BY RAMIREZ, I DROVE BY IT TODAY.
HE HAS A DRIVEWAY IN THE FRONT.
DOESN'T USE THE ALLEY.
SO THESE PEOPLE ARE ARGUING THAT EVERYBODY, OTHER PEOPLE
HAVE TO USE THE ALLEY, BUT THEY DON'T.
THAT'S A BIG PROBLEM.
AND THIS WAS VOTED IN FEBRUARY BUT NO ONE KNEW THAT THAT WAS
GOING TO HAPPEN.
I TALKED TO SOME BUILDERS AND THEY SAID THEY WERE
BLIND-SIDED BY THIS.
I WAS BLIND-SIDED BY THIS.
I TORE MY HOUSE DOWN.
I CAN'T GO ANYWHERE ELSE.
THE PROPERTIES ARE SO EXPENSIVE RIGHT NOW, I CAN'T AFFORD TO
GO BY ANOTHER LOT SOMEWHERE ELSE.
I GOT LUCKY ENOUGH THAT I BOUGHT THIS IN 2017 BEFORE THIS
MARKET BLEW UP.
AND RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER, I MEAN, I CAN'T GO ANYWHERE
ELSE, AND IT'S NOT FEASIBLE TO HAVE A GARAGE ON THAT TINY
LOT WITH THAT ON THE ALLEY, AND A TINY LITTLE ALLEY.
I MEAN, WHEN I TALK TO PEOPLE, HOW CAN THEY MAKE YOU USE THE
ALLEY?
BEFORE YOU COULD CHOOSE TO USE THE ALLEY OR NOT.
THAT'S THE PERFECT SET-UP.
WHY FORCE PEOPLE TO HAVE TO USE AN ALLEY?
I MEAN, THIS IS FINANCIALLY KILLING ME BECAUSE I HAVE
ORDERED WINDOWS BACK IN OCTOBER THINKING THAT I WAS GOING TO
HAVE THIS HOUSE NINE MONTHS OUT.
$22,000 OF WINDOWS THAT JUST GOT HERE.
NOW WHERE DO THEY GO?
THEY ARE GOING TO SAY I CAN'T USE THIS HOUSE, THESE WINDOWS
FOR A HOUSE THAT I CAN'T BUILD.
SO THIS HAS CAUSED MY FAMILY SOME SERIOUS HEARTACHE, AND
THIS IS LIFE CHANGING FOR ME.
I AM NOT SOME FAST BUILDER TRYING TO COME IN AND CHANGE THE
RULE.
I WAS IN THIS HOUSE BEFORE THE RULE CHANGE.
I HAD FRONT PORCH AND A DRIVEWAY.
I SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO HAVE FRONT ACCESS.
AND THEY SAID KEEP CARS OFF THE STREET.
THIS PUTS MOWER CARS ON THE STREET.
WHEN YOU -- THESE HOUSES HAVE FOUR TO FIVE BEDROOMS.
THAT'S FOUR TO FIVE PEOPLE, SIX PEOPLE THAT CAN DRIVE A CAR.
WHERE DO THEIR CARS GO?
THERE'S NO DRIVEWAY.
ONLY A TWO CAR GARAGE.
THE CARS ARE IN THE STREET.
NOW THE CARS ARE GOING DO OVERRUN WITH ALL THE PARKING ON
THE STREETS.
THAT'S MY REBUTTAL.
14:05:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I WILL JUST SAY REAL QUICK, BECAUSE YOU BOUGHT YOUR HOUSE IN
2017 AND IT HAD A CARPORT AND A DRIVEWAY, AND EVERYTHING
THAT YOU ARGUED REGARDING THE WIDTH OF THE ALLEY, YOU DRIVE
A TRUCK, YOU KNOW, YOUR WIFE, EVERYTHING THAT YOU SAID, AND
THAT'S BESIDES THE POINT, BUT I MEAN I DON'T KNOW HOW OTHER
COUNCIL MEMBERS FEEL, AND WE WILL GO TO EVERYBODY, BUT I AM
IN SUPPORT OF OVERTURNING THE DENIAL.
YOU HAVE ALREADY PROVEN YOUR POINT.
AND I CAN SENSE YOUR FRUSTRATION, AND THE HOUSING MARKET IS
RIDICULOUS.
I CAN'T SAY SELL THE LOT AND BUY SOMETHING ELSE BECAUSE WHAT
IS A LOT IF YOU CAN FIND A LOT, WHAT IS IT GOING TO COST?
14:05:48 >> THAT'S WHAT SANDY TOLD ME Y.DON'T YOU GO BUY SOMEWHERE
ELSE?
NO, I BOUGHT THIS HOUSE NOW.
14:05:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MORE IMPORTANTLY IS YOU BOUGHT THE
HOUSE IN 2017, BEFORE THESE CHANGES WERE IMPLEMENTED AND
THAT HOUSE HAD A CARPORT AND A DRIVEWAY.
SO I UNDERSTAND, WE CHANGE THE RULES AND WHATNOT.
BUT WE SHOULD MAKE AN EXCEPTION HERE BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN
INVESTED FIVE YEARS AND YOU ARE WAITING.
YOU KNOW, I GET IT.
SO ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ANY OTHER CONCERNS OR
QUESTIONS?
WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN MOVING.
SO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM CITRO,
SECOND FROM GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION?
14:06:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WILL, IF YOU DO NOT MIND.
AND ITEM NUMBER 63, DE 1-22-95, I MOVE TO OVERTURN THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATION'S DENIAL FOR DESIGN EXCEPTION ON THIS
CASE.
THE PETITIONER HAS PRESENTED THE FACT THAT MOST OF THE
HOUSING ON THE STREET HAVE A PARKING AND GARAGE AT THE
ENTRANCE, IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTIES, AND THE IRREGULAR LOT
DESIGN IS AN INCONVENIENCE TO PROPERTY OWNER FOR PARKING IN
THE REAR.
14:07:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
YES, SIR?
14:07:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
FOR THE PURPOSES, IF YOU CAN STATE THE
SECTIONS RELATIVE --
14:07:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
OH, I'M SORRY, 27-60 AND 27-241-2-POINT C
.5.
14:07:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOUR MOTION TO OVERTURN, DOES THAT MEAN
THOSE STANDARDS SHOULD BE WAIVED?
14:07:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
YES, PLEASE.
14:07:43 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OKAY.
ON THE BASIS OF THE FACTS AS THEY HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO
YOU?
14:07:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, SIR.
14:07:52 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
14:07:58 >> MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK VOTING NO.
14:08:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
YOU ARE GOOD TO GO.
14:08:04 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
14:08:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 64.
14:08:07 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
MAY WE HAVE JUST ONE MOMENT?
14:08:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
14:08:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF I CAN JUST WITH REGARD TO THIS CASE
WHICH IS E 1-22-050 AT 2423 WEST STATE STREET, A MOTION TO
RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMENTS, ANYTHING, VERBALLY
COMMUNICATED PLEASE DO SO NOW.
14:08:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYBODY?
NO.
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMEMBER MIRANDA, SECONDED BY CITRO.
YES, MA'AM.
14:09:02 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
I'M HERE ON ITEM NUMBER 64, FOR PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS
FILED FOR DE 1-22-50 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2423 WEST
STATE STREET.
THE PETITIONER FOR THIS CASE WILL BE REPRESENTING THE
PETITIONER IS BRYANT DUNIVAN.
THE PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTED A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW
VEHICLE ACCESS TO THE STREETS IN LIEU OF ACCESS TO THE ALLEY
IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, AND TO HAVE FLOOR HEIGHT LESS
THAN 24 FEET -- 24 INCHES AS REQUIRED BY THE CODE.
STAFF DENIED THE REQUEST FOR THE DESIGN EXCEPTION ON JANUARY
23rd OF 2022.
ON THE BASIS THAT THE APPLICATION DID NOT MEET THE CODE
CRITERIAS IN SECTION 27-241 SUBSECTION 2 C 5 AND C 7,
ADDITIONALLY CODE SECTION 27-60.
AS I EARLY PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED CITY COUNCIL THE RELEVANT
CODE SECTIONS, THE SAMPLE MOTION AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE
RELEVANT TO THIS CASE.
THE STATEMENT OF REVIEW IS GUIDED BY CITY OF TAMPA CODE
SECTION 27-61 SUBSECTION J-2 WHICH STATES THAT CITY COUNCIL
CAN ACCEPT NEW EVIDENCE, TAKE PUBLIC TESTIMONY, AND AFTER
HEARING ALL THE EVIDENCE, CITY COUNCIL ON ITS OWN CAN
DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPLICATION MEETS THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 27-241 SUBSECTION C-2-5 AND C-7 AND ALSO
27-60.
AFTER HEARING FROM STAFF, MR. ANDY MIKULSKI REGARDING THE
DECISION OF THE STAFF BEFORE THIS APPLICATION AND THE
OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION, CITY COUNCIL CAN AFFIRM THE
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND THEREBY DENY THE
REQUEST FOR THE DESIGN EXCEPTION, OR CITY COUNCIL CAN
OVERTURN THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND
THEREBY GRANT THE DESIGN EXCEPTION.
WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MR. MIKULSKI.
14:11:22 >> ANDY MIKULSKI, URBAN DESIGN COORDINATOR.
MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
14:11:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
MAKE IT BIGGER.
14:11:37 >>> CAN YOU SEE THE FULL SCREEN NOW?
14:11:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR.
GO AHEAD.
14:11:44 >> IT'S DE-22-50, 2423 WEST STATE STREET, IN THE OVERLAY,
AND REQUESTING ALLOWING VEHICLE ACCESS TO THE STREET IN LIEU
OF THE ALLEY AND THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST TO WAIVE THE
REQUIRED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 24 INCHES ABOVE
SURROUNDING GRADE, WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE WEST TAMPA
OVERLAY.
SO SUBJECT PROPERTY IN RED.
IT'S ONE BLOCK EAST OF TAMPANIA.
AGAIN THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW.
I WON'T GO OVER THESE.
AND OUR FINDINGS.
IT'S INCONSISTENT BASED ON USE OF PUBLIC ALLEY, VEHICLE SASS
TO THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ALLEYS AS A PRIMARY
VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT.
AND ALSO INCONSISTENT WITH THE SECOND REQUEST OF THE FLOOR
HEIGHT, WHICH IS THE INTENT OF REQUIRING ELEVATED FINISH
FLOOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ENCOURAGE COMPATIBLE DESIGN
WITH THE HISTORIC HOUSING STYLES WHICH ARE CHARACTERISTIC OF
THE WEST TAMPA COMMUNITY.
THE FINISHED FLOORING OF SINGLE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY, SEMI
DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES ABOVE
THE FINISHED GRADE MEASURED ALONG ALL SIDES OF THE
STRUCTURE.
BOTH REQUESTS WERE DENIED BY STAFF AS THE ALLEYWAY WAS
DETERMINED TO BE OPEN AND USED AND THERE WAS NO COMPELLING
SITE CONDITION TO REDUCE THE REQUIREMENT OF THE 24-INCH
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
AGAIN, THE FINDINGS, NEW DRIVEWAYS AND DOUBLE CAR DRIVEWAYS
IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND INCREASES NUMBER
OF CONFLICT POINTS ON SIDEWALKS, AND TO BE BUILT SIDEWALKS,
AND YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS A LACK OF SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT
THE CITY, ESPECIALLY WEST TAMPA.
EXPECT WITH THE RECENT SIDEWALK CHANGES THAT WE ARE GOING TO
BE BUILDING A LOT MORE SIDEWALKS.
SO AGAIN, IT'S TO ALSO PRESERVE THE ON-STREET OPPORTUNITIES
FOR ON-STREET PARKING.
AND POINT NUMBER 4, THE EXCEPTION IS MINIMUM AS POSSIBLE,
THE EXISTING ALLEY IS PAVED AND USABLE TO PREVENT COMPLIANCE
WITH THE CODE SECTION AND THERE'S ALSO TOPOGRAPHY ISSUES
PREVENTING THE REQUIRED 24-INCH FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
POINT NUMBER 5, AGAIN THIS IS THE SAME AS THE PREVIOUS CASE,
19 OF THE 43 BUILDING PERMIT COMPLIED WITH THE NEW CODE
REQUIREMENT FOR THE ALLEY, TO REQUIRE ALLEY ACCESS.
WE HAVEN'T HAD ANYONE REQUEST TO WAIVE THAT 24-INCH FINISHED
FLOOR ELEVATION, SO THAT'S -- THERE'S NOTHING TO COMPARE IT
TO.
AND THE LAST POINT IS THAT THE EXCEPTION IS CONSISTENT WITH
ANY APPLICABLE SPECIFIC PLANS.
WE HAVE THE PURPOSE OF THE OVERLAY TO ENSURE THAT NEW
DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING -- THE HISTORIC
PATTERN OF WEST TAMPA.
AND FACING GARAGES ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH PATTERN AND SLAB
ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE HISTORIC
PATTERN OF WEST TAMPA.
14:15:10 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MY QUESTION -- AND MARTY, TELL ME IF I AM
OFF -- MR. MANISCALCO, QUESTION.
TO ASK FOR THE OVERLAY IN WEST TAMPA TO BE REVIEWED.
I CORRECT?
14:15:34 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
ABBYE FEELEY CAME BEFORE YOU AND GAVE A PRESENTATION, I
BELIEVE A WORKSHOP, I DON'T RECALL THE DATE, BUT MS. FEELEY
DID COME BEFORE YOU TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THAT.
14:15:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
AND THEN WORKING ON THIS PARTICULAR
SITUATION IN WEST TAMPA, CORRECT?
14:15:54 >> YES.
14:15:55 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
WHY ARE THESE CASES GOING --
14:16:03 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
BECAUSE THE RULE HAS NOT BEEN
CHANGED.
14:16:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I GOT MY ANSWER.
THANK YOU.
14:16:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
GO AHEAD, SIR.
14:16:09 >> AGAIN, SAME AS THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, 19 OF THE 43 NEW
BUILTS HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALLEY ACCESS, AND NOW I WILL RUN
THROUGH PHOTOS OF THE SITE.
2423 WEST STATE STREET.
HERE IS THE ALLEY.
AGAIN IT'S ABOUT A 14 -- ALLEYWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 14 FEET,
PAVEMENT IS ABOUT 9, BUT THE PAVEMENT IS IN MUCH BETTER
CONDITION THAN THE PREVIOUS ALLEY.
THE FENCE, IT'S ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
THE FENCE LEANING INTO THE ALLEYWAY, THAT'S BEHIND THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
SO THAT'S BEING REMOVED WHEN THEY START CONSTRUCTION.
AND THAT IS IT.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
14:16:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
HEARING NONE, WE WILL GO TO THE APPLICANT.
YOU HAVE 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT, SIR.
THEN WE'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
14:17:02 >> CAN COUNCIL SEE MY SCREEN?
14:17:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
14:17:20 >> BASICALLY, COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE HAVE SIMILAR ISSUES AS THE
LAST APPLICATION.
14:17:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
STATE YOUR NAME.
14:17:27 >> BRYANT DUNIVAN, ADDRESS 301 WEST PLATT STREET, TAMPA,
FLORIDA 33606.
I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF THIS APPLICATION IT
WAS MAESTRA INCORPORATED AND NOW IS SANDRA SANCHEZ, 2423
STATE STREET.
YOU CAN SEE THE DESIGN.
THE PROPOSED DESIGN.
MRS. SANCHEZ HAS BEEN EAGERLY AWAITING CONSTRUCTION ABSENT
THIS ISSUE.
PRIOR TO GETTING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL, THE 24-INCH DESIGN
EXCEPTION HAS BEEN ESSENTIALLY WHAT IS DRAWN BY THE
APPLICANT.
WE ARE NOT PURSUING THAT.
THIS IS SOLELY ON THE ALLEYWAY ISSUE.
AND THE REASON FOR THE ALLEYWAY ISSUE THAT WE TAKE ISSUE
WITH IS THE FACT THAT -- I'M SORRY -- IS THE FACT THAT THIS
ALLEY ACCESS PROVISION IS TOO BROAD.
CITY COUNCIL HAS DEALT WITH THIS ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS.
AS FAR BACK AS OCTOBER, COUNCILMEMBER MIRANDA CITED THE NEED
FOR THIS HISTORIC USE.
THE HISTORIC USE OF ALLEYS IS THE SURFACE.
MR. MIRANDA WENT TO GREAT DISCUSSION ABOUT FOR TRASH CANS.
IT WASN'T EVER PROPOSED TO HAVE MAIN ACCESS TO A LOT GO
THROUGH THE ALLEYS.
THIS LOT IN QUESTION AS WE ARE LOOKING AT 27-241-C-2-5 IF AN
EXISTING LOT IS ADJACENT TO AN OPEN USE ALLEY PARTICULAR
ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ALLEY AS PRIMARY
VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT.
IT'S OUR CONTENTION THAT THIS ALLEYWAY IS NOT OPEN AND USED
IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE BUILDING PLAN.
IN LOOKING AT THE OVERLAY AREA, AND I HAVE GOT A NUMBER OF
AERIALS, HOPEFULLY THIS IS CLEAR ENOUGH.
I TRIED TO MAKE IT AS BIG AS I CAN.
YOU WILL SEE A BIG RED PLACARD, 2423 WEST STATE STREET.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT 25, 2119, ENTIRE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD,
ALL USES STATE STREET OR CYPRESS STREET AS THE PRIMARY
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY.
IN FACT IN LOOKING AT THE -- THROUGH THE ALLEY, YOU SEE
NUMBER OF FENCES.
THIS ALLEY IS ON PLATT.
WE HAVE GOT PHOTOGRAPHS, AND IT WOULD BE HARD FOR COUNCIL TO
MAKE OUT.
YOU SHOULD SEE A TAPE MEASURE THAT'S IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS
ALLEYWAY.
THE APPLICANTS HAVE ACTUALLY MEASURED APPORTION OF THE
ALLEY.
THIS MEASUREMENT WAS 7 FEET 1 INCH.
THAT'S SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW THE 9-FOOT THRESHOLD.
THIS IS DIRECTLY BEHIND THE PARCEL.
UNDERSTANDING WHAT MRS. SANCHEZ WILL HAVE TO DO WHEN SHE
PULLS INTO HER LOT, SHE'S GOING TO HAVE TO -- IF COUNCIL UP
HOLD THIS AND DOES NOT GRANT IT, OVERTURN THE DESIGN
FINDING, SHE'S GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE A 90-DEGREE TURN
THROUGH ESSENTIALLY A 7-FOOT ALLEY TO GET ACCESS TO THIS
PROPERTY.
AND ONCE SHE HAS TO LEAVE SHE'S GOING TO HAVE TO BACK UP TO
THAT SAME ALLEYWAY AND TRY TO MAKE IT OUT WITHOUT DAMAGING
HER NEIGHBOR'S FENCE OR DAMAGING HER VEHICLE OR TEARING UP
THE LAWN. IN LOOKING JUST AT USE OF THIS AREA,
HISTORICALLY, THE CURRENT CODE REQUIRES A DESIGN EXCEPTION
JUST ON THE BASIS THAT A 7-FOOT AREA CANNOT PULL IN FOR A
DRIVEWAY AT THAT POINT.
A HONDA CIVIC, FOR EXAMPLE, STILL THAT TURN IS DIFFICULT TO
MAKE.
AS WE GO BACK TO THE ALLEYWAY, AND IT MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
STANDARDS REFERENCED IN 27-283.92.
WE ACTUALLY LOOKED AT WHAT THAT REQUIRES, AND FOR THIS,
BECAUSE IT'S A 90-DEGREE TURN, HAS TO FIT THAT PARKING
REQUIREMENT, YOU ARE DEALING WITH -- I WILL TRY TO SHARE
THIS ON THE ELMO.
THIS IS THE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARD.
BECAUSE IT'S A 90-DEGREE TURN THAT WOULD REQUIRE AN AISLE
WIDTH OF 24 FEET.
YOU DON'T HAVE THAT WIDTH WITHIN THE ALLEY.
JUST BASED ON THE ALLEY REQUIREMENT, IT DOESN'T MEET THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS AS REQUIRED BY ITS OWN CODE.
SO BECAUSE OF THAT IT'S WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR THE DESIGN
EXCEPTION.
NOW, WE HAVE GONE -- AND THESE IMAGES ARE ALL FROM GOOGLE
EARTH.
WE ALSO PULLED THE STREET IMAGES.
THIS BUILDING WITH THE WHITE FRONTAGE, THAT'S THE SUBJECT.
THAT SUBJECT PARCEL WILL BE TORN DOWN AND REPLACED WITH OUR
PROPOSED DESIGN.
THE NEIGHBOR TO THE LEFT AND TO THE RIGHT BOTH USE STREET
ACCESS.
IN FACT, THE YELLOW, NEWER CONSTRUCTION HOME, UTILIZES A
U-SHAPED DRIVEWAY, WHICH IT ACCESSES THE STREET NOT ONE
POINT BUT TWO POINTS.
REGARD NOT ONLY DOES THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD USE THE
STREETS, BUT ACTUALLY SUPPORT MRS. SANTOS, HER PROPOSED
DESIGN EXCEPTION.
SHE'S GATHERED 15 SIGNATURES FROM THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS
THAT SAY THEY ARE ALL AGREEABLE.
AND THIS IS ATTACHED TO THE PETITION THAT WAS FILED TODAY
FOR THE DESIGN EXCEPTION REVIEW.
THESE ARE ALL OF HER NEIGHBORS.
AND 2421 STATE STREET, 2422 STATE STREET, 2424 STATE STREET,
ALL THE NEIGHBORS IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD ACTUALLY SUPPORT THE
DESIGN EXCEPTION BY CONTINUING HISTORIC USE OF USING THE
STREET AND UTILIZING THAT STREET TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE FRONT
OF THE PROPERTY.
AS THE PRIOR APPLICANT INDICATED, THESE ALLEYS ARE TOO
NARROW FOR FIRE DEPARTMENTS, TOO NARROW FOR ANYONE TO USE
FROM A PUBLIC SAFETY STANDPOINT, AND THAT'S PART OF WHAT THE
HISTORIC -- PART OF WHAT ABOUT R THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
STANDS FOR, IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE SAFETY AND FURTHER THAT
END.
IF THE POLICE AREN'T EXPECTED TO GO DOWN AN ALLEYWAY TO
ACCESS SOMEONE'S HOME IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, HAVING
ESSENTIALLY EMERGENCY SERVICES ENTER THROUGH THE REAR OF A
BUILDING, IF THIS DESIGN EXCEPTION IS NOT GRANTED.
OF COURSE, I RESERVE THE ARREST OF MY TIME FOR REBUTTAL.
14:23:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU STILL GET REBUTTAL ANYWAY IF YOU
STAY WITHIN 15 MINUTES.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME?
ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
PUBLIC COMMENT.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK?
IF NOT, I KNOW MRS. SANDY SANTOS IS ALSO REGISTERED FOR THIS
ITEM.
I SEE NO ONE HERE IN THE PUBLIC.
IF WE CAN GO TO SANDY SANCHEZ.
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEEN SWORN IN SO PLEASE TURN YOUR CAMERA ON
AND STATE YOUR NAME.
YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
14:24:21 >> ONE SECOND.
OKAY.
GOOD MORNING, CITY COUNCIL.
MY NAME IS SANDY SANCHEZ.
I'M PRESIDENT OF THE GARDENS CIVIC ASSOCIATION, ALSO
HISTORIC COMMITTEE OF THE WEST TAMPA CRA, CSA, WORKING ON
THE EXISTING WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CHANGES TO THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY
WERE TO MAKE STREETS SAFER FOR ALL USERS, ESPECIALLY THE
VULNERABLE POPULATION.
WHILE IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL, BLOBBING THE
SIDEWALK FORCES PEDESTRIANS AND CHILDREN TO USE THE STREETS.
AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD UNDER WENT TAMPA ALREADY HAVE NO
SIDEWALKS.
WHEN I FIRST GLANCED AT MRS. SANTOS CONTRACT PLANS, I
THOUGHT ANOTHER CONTRACTOR IS NOTE FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES
OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
THERE IS NO ALLEY ACCESS.
THEN I LOOKED AGAIN.
HE DESIGNED THE DRIVEWAY SO THERE'S MORE THAN 35 FEET LONG
AND THE GARAGE IS FURTHER BACK ON THE PROPERTY.
ROOMS FOR CARS AND SIDEWALKS.
AS I SAID BEFORE, THE CHANGES TO THE WEST TAMPA CRA ARE
CONTINUING TO WORK WITH STAFF TO EXPAND THE LANGUAGE AND
PROVIDE OTHER SOLUTIONS SINCE WE REALIZED THAT ONE SIZE
FIGHTS ALL SOLUTION IS NOT PRACTICAL.
WE ARE LOOKING FOR DIFFERENT OPTIONS.
MR. COLE LOAN THOUGHT OUT OF THE BOX AND HAS GIVEN US
ANOTHER OPTION.
WHILE THIS ALLEY IS CLEAR AND WIDE ENOUGH, WE FEEL THAT HE
HAS FULFILLED THE INTENT OF THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY BY
CREATING THIS DRIVEWAY TO KEEP THE CARS OFF THE STREET.
I PERSONALLY COMMEND MR. CO-LOAN FOR STUDYING HOMES THAT
APPEARS TO FULFILL THE INTENT OF MAKING OR STREETS SAFER.
IF THERE ARE NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED, AND IT IS
THE DRIVEWAY IS AT LEAST 35 FEET LONG, IT APPEARS -- AS IT
APPEARS ON THE PLANS, I RECOMMEND THAT YOU ALLOW THE DESIGN
EXCEPTION FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2423 WEST STATE STREET, BUT
ONLY YOU UNDER THOSE EXCEPTIONS.
I WOULD LIKE TO ADD A COUPLE THINGS.
GENTLEMEN, WHEN THE APPLICANTS APPLY, THESE HOUSES WERE
BUILT IN 1930, 1940, OF COURSE WE ALL HAVE FRONT DRIVEWAYS.
BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY IT WAS BUILT BACK THEN.
THE OLDER HOMES HAVE THE LONGER DRIVEWAYS, AND IT DOESN'T
APPEAR TO BE A PROBLEM.
IT'S THE NEWER HOMES THAT GIVE YOU THE SHORT DRIVEWAYS THAT
CAUSE THE CARS TO STICK OUT THAT THERE'S NO ROOM.
SO WHEN YOU ARE LISTENING TO THESE APPLICANTS THAT COME IN,
PLEASE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT WHILE THEY ARE TALKING
ABOUT THEY ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE WHAT ARE GOING TO
BE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ALLEY ACCESS, THEY ARE ALSO THE ONLY
PEOPLE ON THE BLOCK WHO ARE GOING TO HAVE A TWO-STORY HOUSE
WHICH IS ALSO DIFFERENT.
SO I ASK THAT YOU ALLOW THIS DESIGN EXCEPTION.
THANK YOU.
14:27:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THAT'S THE ONLY REGISTERED SPEAKER.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
NO?
14:27:37 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
I PROVIDED THE SAMPLE MOTIONS.
BUT BASED UPON THE AGENT'S PRESENTATION THAT THEY ARE NOT
GOING FORWARD REGARDING THE OVER-JUST CONFIRMED THAT ON THE
RECORD -- THEN FOR THE SAMPLE MOTION IF CITY COUNCIL COULD
WITHDRAW THAT CODE SECTION CONSIDERATION FOR THE MOTION.
AND THAT CODE SECTION SPECIFICALLY IS 27-241 SUBSECTION
2-C-7.
14:28:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALLEY ACCESS ONLY, CORRECT?
14:28:17 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
ALLEY ACCESS IS 241 SUBSECTION
2-C-5.
14:28:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SO WE ARE TO ELIMINATE THAT FROM THE
MOTION.
14:28:26 >> ELIMINATE C-7.
14:28:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY, SORRY.
14:28:29 >>CAMARIA PETTIS-MACKLE:
IF YOU COULD CONFIRM THAT ON THE
RECORD, PLEASE.
14:28:32 >> YES, IF I WASN'T CLEAR BEFORE, WE ARE WITHDRAWING THE
24-INCH GRADE REQUIREMENT, THE C-7 EXCEPTION.
WE ARE WITHDRAWING THAT.
14:28:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY.
14:28:42 >> WE ARE ONLY PROCEEDING UNDER THE ALLEYWAY EXCEPTION.
THANK YOU, MRS. SANCHEZ, FOR HER SUPPORT.
14:28:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?
DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD?
14:28:55 >> I WOULD NOTE SINCE IT WAS ALLUDED TO AND MRS. SANCHEZ
INDICATED THE DRIVEWAY DOES HAVE A 35-FOOT SETBACK, COULD
PUT FOUR CARS WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN MOST DESIGN FOR THE
WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
14:29:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WITH ROOM FOR A SIDEWALK.
14:29:10 >> IT'S FAR ENOUGH FROM THE SETBACK TO ALLOW PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS AS WELL.
14:29:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYTHING ELSE?
14:29:16 >> THAT'S IT.
14:29:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE FROM GUDES AND CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ALL RIGHT.
WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, GO AHEAD, SIR.
14:29:36 >>BILL CARLSON:
CITY ATTORNEY, CORRECT ME IF I MISS
ANYTHING BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO OVERTURN THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DENIAL, DESIGN EXCEPTION APPLICATION
D-1-22-05 L 50 BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE NECESSARY
STANDARDS, THEY HAVE PROVIDED, IN ADDITION, PROVIDED
SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR FOUR CARS, AND ALSO PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,
AND ACCOMMODATING AN OLDER HOME.
14:30:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT.
YOU ARE GOOD.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A 5-MINUTE RECESS SO WE CAN GET STAFF
AND HAVE BEEN ELSE SITUATED BEFORE WE CONTINUE WITH THE
AGENDA.
AND THEN WE WILL BE BACK.
THANKS.
(CITY COUNCIL RECESS).
14:44:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ROLL CALL.
14:45:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
14:45:04 >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
14:45:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
14:45:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
14:45:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
14:45:11 >>THE CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
14:45:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WELCOME BACK.
WE HAVE MR. JOHNSON TO PRESENT THE CITIZENS BUDGET.
14:45:21 >> I THINK IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE I HAVE BEEN BEFORE
COUNCIL BUT THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.
14:45:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
14:45:32 >> JOE JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN.
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE, CITIZENS BUDGET AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE.
TODAY, I AM HERE TO TOUCH ON WHAT OUR COMMITTEE IS GOING.
WE ALREADY KNOW WHERE WE HAVE BEEN, BUT WE WANT TO DISCUSS
WHERE WE ARE GOING, AND WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE
ADMINISTRATION, WITH THE DEPARTMENTS, MAINLY THE BUDGET
DEPARTMENT, AND ALL THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
SO WITH THAT, THE COMMITTEES MET YESTERDAY AS WE DO ON A
MONTHLY BASIS, AND WE DISCUSS SOME OF THE PROCESSES THAT
HAVE BEEN IN PLACE AS PERTAINS -- (AUDIO DROP)
CONTINUE TO MEET WITH THE PUBLIC, AND MEET WITH DEPARTMENTS
WELL IN ADVANCE OF THE BUDGET PRESENTATION THAT THE MAYOR
PUTS OUT.
SO THAT WAY, WE ARE NOT CATCHING UP, WE ARE NOT CATCHING UP
FROM BEHIND, WE ARE COMING IN FROM BEHIND, WE ARE ACTUALLY
ON TARGET IN STEP WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, AS PERTAINS TO BE
RECOMMENDATIONS.
SO THAT MEANS THAT ORIGINALLY WE ASK TO MEET QUARTERLY WITH
THE DEPARTMENTS TO DISCUSS PROJECTS THEY ARE WORKING ON
CURRENTLY AND PROJECTS THAT THEY HAVE COMING UP IN THE
FUTURE, FORECAST IN THE FUTURE.
SO WE THINK WE FEEL THAT IT IS BEST WHEN STAFF AND THE
BUDGET OFFICE IS CONSTRUCTING THE NEW FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
THAT WE BE A PART OF THAT PROCESS SO THAT WAY WE CAN ASK
QUESTIONS AND RECEIVE THE ANSWERS AND WE CAN FORM BETTER
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL.
SO I THINK THAT -- I FEEL THAT MYSELF AND CFO ROGER O, WE
ARE ON THE SAME PAGE WITH THAT, AND I THINK WITH MR.
SHELBY'S INPUT AND ALSO MR. MASSEY, I THINK THAT EVERYBODY
IS ALIGNED.
BUT I DID HAVE A QUESTION, BECAUSE I DON'T WANT IT TO BE ANY
CONFUSION.
I KNOW THERE'S A RESOLUTION THAT WAS PUT IN PLACE THAT
FORMED THIS COMMITTEE BACK IN 2008 BUT TODAY THIS CURRENT
COUNCIL, THE QUESTION IS, WHAT IS THE EXPECTATION OF THIS
COUNCIL AS PERTAINS TO THE BUDGET AND FINANCE, THE CITIZENS
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE?
WHAT IS YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF US AS PERTAINS TO THIS PROCESS?
THAT WAS A QUESTION THAT CAME UP DURING OUR MEETING
YESTERDAY.
14:48:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MY QUESTION TO MYSELF WHEN YOU FIRST
TOOK IT IN, I AM NOT FOR OR AGAINST ANYTHING OF ANY KIND,
BUT THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AS ALWAYS RECEIVED OUTSTANDING
REVIEWS FROM US AND OTHER AGENCIES DURING THE COURSE THAT I
HAVE BEEN HERE.
SO WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR, I GUESS IS YOUR QUESTION?
14:48:32 >> CORRECT.
14:48:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND I AM LOOKING FOR WE HAVE INTERNAL
AUDITORS, WE HAVE EXTERNAL AUDITORS, AND NEVER FOUND A
MISTAKE AT ALL THAT I KNOW OF, ANYWAY, IN THE SYSTEM WE HAVE
IN PLACE.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR COMMITTEE WANTS OR WHAT YOU ARE
LOOKING FOR.
14:48:47 >> WELL, AGAIN WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE RESOLUTION, THE
RESOLUTION WAS CLEAR AS PERTAINS TO THE FUNCTION OF THIS
COMMITTEE, AND THAT IS TO LOOK AT THE BUDGET, LOOK AT THE
BUDGET, MEET WITH THE DEPARTMENTS, AND MAKE SOUND ECONOMICAL
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL.
I THINK THAT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS -- AND NO SLIGHT TO MY
PREDECESSOR -- BUT I BELIEVE THAT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS
UNDER MY GUIDANCE AS CHAIRMAN, WE HAVE DONE THAT, BUT IN
DOING SO, AND I LIKE TO SAY I'M A STRAIGHT SHOOTER.
YOU KNOW, SOME PEOPLE ARE FOR IT, SOME PEOPLE ARE NOT FOR
IT.
SO AGAIN THIS IS A COUNCIL COMMITTEE.
THAT'S WHERE THE QUESTION WAS RAISED, WHAT IS THE
EXPECTATION?
ARE WE TO STICK WITH THE RESOLUTION AND DO JUST THAT?
OR ARE WE TO ATTAR IT IN ANOTHER WAY AND MOVE IN A DIFFERENT
DIRECTION?
SO I WAS CLEAR ON THE RESOLUTION, BUT --
14:49:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IT DOESN'T BOTHER ME EITHER WAY.
14:49:56 >> BUT I THINK MOVING FORWARD, I THINK STILL MOVING FORWARD,
YOU KNOW, WE SAT DOWN.
IF THE ADMINISTRATION THINKS -- THEY HAVE ALLOWED THEIR
DEPARTMENT HEADS TO COME AND MEET WITH US.
SOMETIMES IT COULD BE A LITTLE HEATED AS WE TRY TO GET
INFORMATION, AND, YOU KNOW, SOME PEOPLE LIKE IT, SOME PEOPLE
DON'T.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, I THINK THAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED
A LOT OF GREAT THINGS THIS COUNCIL, AND SOME THINGS WE CAN
IMPROVE UPON, AND THAT'S WHY I THINK THE COMMITTEE,
ADMINISTRATION, COUNCIL COMMITTEE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE
AND WE UNDERSTAND --
14:50:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND I AM NOT TRYING QUESTION YOU, BUT WHAT
IS IT YOU THINK YOU CAN IMPROVE UPON?
14:50:44 >> THAT WE CAN IMPROVE UPON?
14:50:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES, SIR.
14:50:47 >> I DON'T THINK THAT THE COMMITTEE, YOU KNOW, HAS THINGS
THAT NEED TO IMPROVE UPON.
I THINK IT'S THE PROCESS OF UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT COUNCIL
AND THE ADMINISTRATION.
BECAUSE THERE ARE TIMES WHERE THERE IS A DISCONNECT.
AND THERE'S A DISCONNECT IN THE INFORMATION THAT WE OBTAIN,
AND THAT WE CAN SAY.
SOME PEOPLE LIKE IT ASSOCIATION PEOPLE DON'T.
SO TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT WE ARE DOING WHAT COUNCIL EXPECTS OF
US.
WE JUST WANT TO IMPROVE UPON THE RECEIVING PROCESS.
SO THAT'S WHAT I'M ADDRESSING HERE.
BUT AGAIN, I HAVE HAD THE CONVERSATION WITH THE CFO, AND I
THINK THAT MOVING FORWARD I THINK THE DRAIN WILL MOVE IN THE
RIGHT DIRECTION.
AND WE AGREE TO DISAGREE.
IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL.
14:51:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I'M NOT PERSONAL ANYTHING.
EVEN IF IT FALLS IN THE CENTER, I'M HAPPY.
I'M HAPPY THE WAY IT WAS, AND GETTING THE BENEFIT TO THE
CITY AND THE TAXPAYERS.
SO WHAT I AM SAYING IS, I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND -- I
UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT PUTTING IT THROUGH THE
CONCEPTUAL CONCEPT OF WHAT'S GOING ON, HAVE YOU FOUND
ANYTHING AT ALL THAT IS AGAINST ANY MEASUREMENTS OF
FINANCING IRREGULARITIES?
14:52:23 >> WELL, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, I BELIEVE, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE
OF MONTHS AGO, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS A MEMO THAT WAS BASED ON
INFORMATION AND HAVING A MEETING WITH A CERTAIN DEPARTMENT,
AND IT RUFFLED A LITTLE FEATHERS, OKAY.
WE HAVE YET TO REALLY DISCUSS THAT.
SO RIGHT NOW, AT THIS MEETING, I WILL NOT DISCUSS THAT,
OKAY.
I WOULD LIKE TO SIT DOWN WITH CHIEF OF STAFF AND -- THE
CHAIRMAN OF COUNCIL AND ALSO THE CFO AND REVIEW IT, BECAUSE
MAYBE THERE'S AN EXPANSION FOR IT.
14:53:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
14:53:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN CITRO AND COUNCILMAN GUDES.
14:53:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU SAID YOU WANT TO BE PART OF THE PROCESS
AND THAT'S WHAT THE ADVISORY BOARD IS, IS PART OF THE
PROCESS.
BUT YOUR STATEMENT WAS YOU WANT TO BE PART OF THE PROCESS.
ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE ACTUAL MAKING OF THE BUDGET?
OR ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE PROCESS THAT WHEN THE BUDGET IS
FINISHED, YOUR COMMITTEE OVERLOOKS IT, AND THEN COMES BACK
WITH REPORTS TO US TO SEE IF MAYBE WE ARE WANTING TO ADD
SOMETHING OR DETRACT SOMETHING FROM THAT BUDGET.
WHICH PART OF THE PROCESS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THAT YOU
WANT TO BE MORE INVOLVED IN?
14:53:53 >> SO IN ORDER FOR US TO MAKE SOUND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
COUNCIL, IN YEARS PAST WE HAVE ALWAYS MET AROUND MAY OR
JUNE.
AND AT THAT TIME, THE BUDGET IS PRETTY MUCH CONSTRUCTED.
I SAFE TO SAY THAT, CHIEF?
OKAY.
SO ONCE THE PROCESS STARTS, WE ARE REALLY NOT SEEING WHAT IS
ACTUALLY IN THE BUDGET, OKAY, WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION IS ASKING FOR, UNTIL AFTER THE MAYOR
PRESENTS.
SO ONCE THE MAYOR PRESENTS, WILL HAVE PRESENTED IN THE PAST,
THEN WE TAKE A LOOK AT PREVIOUS YEAR'S BUDGET AND WE LOOK AT
WHAT THE NEW FISCAL YEAR BUDGET IS GOING TO BE AND THEN WE
SIT DOWN AND WE DISCUSS PRIOR FISCAL YEAR'S BUDGET AND
UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR'S BUDGET AND TRY AND MAKE THE BEST
DECISION POSSIBLE AS PERTAINS TO RECOMMENDATIONS.
SO WHAT WE ARE ASKING IS, ON A YEAR OVER YEAR BASIS GOING
FORWARD WITH THIS COMMITTEE, WHETHER I AM ON THIS COMMITTEE
OR WHOEVER IS ON THIS COMMITTEE, THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS TO
KIND OF BE INVOLVED IN SOMEWHAT OF THAT PROCESS, AND THAT'S
WHERE MEETING QUARTERLY OR MONTHLY WITH DEPARTMENTS TO KIND
OF SEE WHERE THE NUMBERS ARE CURRENTLY AND WHAT THE NUMBERS
ARE LOOKING FOR COMING UP.
SO EVERY YEAR -- GO AHEAD.
14:55:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THE PROCESS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS YOU THE
CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD WANTS TO BE A PART OF THE PROCESS OF
CREATING THIS BUDGET.
14:55:24 >> NO.
NO, WE DON'T WANT TO BE PART OF THE CREATION OF THE BUDGET.
WE JUST NEED TO HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AS TO -- SO WHEN
YOU LOOK AT A BUDGET FROM A BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE, YOU ARE
CONSTANTLY MONITORING YOUR BALANCE SHEET EVERY YEAR, EVERY
MONTH, RIGHT?
SO BASICALLY, EVERY EARMARKED DOLLAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATION
HAS EARMARKED FOR A PROJECT, OR FOR A CONTRACTUAL SERVICE,
WHATEVER SERVICES IS OUT THERE, YOU STILL HAVE TO ACCOUNT
FOR WHERE THAT MONEY IS GOING, AND WHAT'S COMING IN, RIGHT?
SO NEXT YEAR, YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHERE YOU NEED TO SET YOUR
BUDGET LEVELS AT, OKAY?
SO THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE, WHEN I LOOK AT THE
SCOPE OF WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT BUDGET AND FINANCE, YOU ARE
LOOKING AT NUMBERS, YOUR JOB IS TO MONITOR AND MAKE SURE
THAT EITHER WE ARE ON TARGET, BELOW TARGET OR ABOVE IT.
AND IF YOU ARE ABOVE IT, WHAT IS THE EXPECTATION OF IT?
SO WE DON'T WANT TO TELL THE ADMINISTRATION WHAT TO DO.
WE WANT TO LOOK AT WHERE WE ARE AT SO THAT WE CAN MAKE THE
SOUND DECISIONS AS PERTAINS TO THE ECONOMICS OF YOUR
DECISIONS WHEN IT COMES TO APPROVING THAT PROCESS.
14:56:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MY NEXT POINT, AT WHAT PART OF THE PROCESS
IS YOUR BOARD GOING TO COME BACK WITH THE ADVISORS THAT WE
SELECTED TO YOUR BOARD, GOING TO COME BACK AND SAY,
COUNCILPERSON, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SEE DONE WITH THIS
BUDGET?
IS THIS GOING TO BE AFTER THE BUDGET?
IS THIS GOING TO BE DURING THE PROCESS OF THE MAKING OF THE
BUDGET?
AT WHAT POINT --
14:57:09 >> OF THE BUDGET BEING CONSTRUCTED.
SO PROBABLY RIGHT TOWARDS -- I WOULD SAY THE MIDDLE OR THE
END.
BUT BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY ON A QUARTERLY BASIS
OR MONTHLY BASIS TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE CURRENT FISCALS AND
LOOKING AT WHAT THEIR PROJECTIONS ARE GOING TO THE NEW
FISCAL YEAR THAT GIVES US A BETTER IDEA AND UNDERSTANDING AS
TO WHERE THE BUDGET IS GOING TO BE GOING, FOR THE NEXT
FISCAL YEAR.
SO YOU LOOK AT YOUR PROJECTIONS, AND YOU HAVE ENOUGH TIME
INDIVIDUALLY, CAN COME TO YOU AND SAY, THIS IS WHAT THE
ADMINISTRATION IS THINKING, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS, AND SO
ON.
THESE ARE OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
DID I ANSWER THE QUESTION?
14:57:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES AND NO.
14:57:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
14:57:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
WELL, I KNOW THERE ARE SOME GOOD PEOPLE
THAT WORKED OFTEN THIS COMMITTEE.
WHAT I CAN SAY MR. JOHNSON IS WHAT THE COMMUNITY HAS SAID, I
MEAN THE BROAD EVERYONE IN THE CITY SAID YOU HAVE DONE A
HELL OF A JOB FOR TWO YEARS, MY FRIEND.
THAT'S WHAT THE PEOPLE SAY WHO ARE WATCHING.
I SELECTED YOU TO BE ON THAT COMMITTEE, BUT WHAT THE PEOPLE
SAY.
I KNOW YOU ARE A FINANCE GUY.
I KNOW YOU ARE A MONEY GUY.
THAT'S WHY I SAID, YOU NEED TO HAVE PEOPLE ON THAT BOARD,
NOT JUST BECAUSE OF A FRIEND BUT PEOPLE WHO KNOW MONEY, WHO
KNOW BUDGETS.
JUST HAVING SOMEBODY ON THE BOARD WHO DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO
SPREADSHEETS, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO REALLY ORGANIZE.
YOU ARE WASTING THE TIME, AND WASTING THE TIME WITH
COMMITTEE.
I KNOW THAT THERE'S SOME CHALLENGES WITH THE COMMITTEE,
BECAUSE FINDING OUT THE COMMITTEE WAS NOT OPERATING THE WAY
THE SHOULD HAVE OPERATED.
SO THAT BROUGHT A LIGHT ON THE COMMITTEE.
AND TO GET THINGS TO WHERE I BELIEVE THE RESOLUTION WAS
INTENDED FOR.
WHEN I LOOK AT THE RESOLUTION, WHEN I LOOK AT THE COMMITTEE
WANTED, IT'S REALLY OVERSIGHT.
14:59:10 >> YES.
14:59:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
OVERSIGHT OF WHAT WE ARE SPENDING WHAT WE
ARE DOING, HOW WE ARE SPENDING OUR MONEY ON PROJECTS AND
WHAT WHATEVER, EXPECTATIONS TO THIS COUNCIL.
AND WE LOOK AT WHAT THE BUDGET FINANCE COMMITTEE, AS
ADVISORS, BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE STAFF TO GO SEE WHAT CHIEF
OF STAFF IS DOING OR ANYBODY, WE DON'T HAVE THAT STAFF LIKE
OTHERS MIGHT HAVE STAFF THAT CAN GIVE US INFORMATION, SO
THEY ARE DOING IT BUT WE DON'T AGREE WITH IT.
EACH CHARLIE SAID WE SHOULD HAVE -- THE BUDGET ANALYSIS.
SO THE CHARTER ABOUT NOT HAVING THAT PERSON TO TELL US WHAT
WE NEED TO BE DOING AND WHAT WE DON'T.
SO WE ARE VIOLATING OUR OWN RULE.
THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AS WELL.
THAT'S WHAT THE CHARTER SAYS.
WHEN I LOOK AT OVERSIGHT, I LOOKED AT THE BUDGET, THE
COMMITTEE TO TALK -- WE HAD A MEETING, RIGHT WHEN THE
COMMITTEE SAID, WE BELIEVE IT MAY BE OUT OF BOUNDS.
THEY MAY BE DOING A GREAT JOB AT GETTING AWARDS AND
EVERYTHING BUT STILL SOMETIMES INTERNALLY WE COULD BE A
LITTLE BETTER BECAUSE YOU MIGHT BE DOING THINGS WAY BETTER
THAN OTHER PEOPLE ARE, YOU ARE DOING THINGS BETTER THAN
OTHERS DO.
THAT'S THE WAY THINGS GO.
AGAIN, THE WAY I LOOK AT IT, THE WAY I SEE IT, IS A
RESOLUTION, AND THIS COMMITTEE IS AN OVERSIGHT OF THE CITY,
AND TO GIVE RECOMMENDATIONS, SOUND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THIS
COUNCIL FOR SUPPORT OR NOT TO SUPPORT.
SO THAT'S HOW I LOOK AT -- I WANT TO GET YOUR TAKE ON WHAT I
JUST SAID, BUT THAT'S WHAT I READ IT.
THAT'S HOW I TAKE IT.
15:00:58 >> WHEN YOU READ THE RESOLUTION, THE RESOLUTION IS VERY
CLEAR.
I MEAN, I HAVE READ THE RESOLUTION PROBABLY ABOUT TEN TIMES.
I ALSO LOOKED AT THE ORDINANCE AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BUDGET,
AS IT PERTAINS TO COUNCIL.
BEING IN CONTROL OF THE BUDGET UNTIL THE BUDGET FOR THE
UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR.
EVERYTHING YOU SAID IS CORRECT.
BUT I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S RECOMMENDATIONS AT TIMES
THAT THIS COMMITTEE HAS MADE TO COUNCIL AND, YOU KNOW,
COUNCIL ITSELF HAS, YOU KNOW, OVERLOOKED, AND I WILL JUST
GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
THIS CITY IS GROWING.
IT'S GROWING TREMENDOUSLY.
THE CENSUS SAID THE CITY IS GROWING, IT GREW 25%.
BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF
TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, CENSUS DATA CAME, IT'S POSTED,
BUT THE CITY IS CONSTANTLY GROWING.
SO IT SAYS WE GREW 25%, BUT I CAN TELL YOU, IF YOU JUST LOOK
AT IT.
WE ARE PROBABLY AT ABOUT, I WOULD SAY, 37 TO 44%.
WITH THAT, WE TALK ABOUT JUST WHAT YOU SAID.
YOU KNOW, MAKING SOUND RECOMMENDATIONS.
ONE.
RECOMMENDATIONS WE MADE WAS AN EXPANSION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL'S BUDGET.
WE RECOMMENDED IT AS A COMMITTEE.
THERE IS A FEW OTHER THINGS THAT WE RECOMMENDED.
BUT IT'S UP TO THIS COUNCIL TO LISTEN.
YOU CAN HAVE THE COMMITTEE, BUT WHEN COMMITTEE MEMBERS MAKE
THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL, SOUND RECOMMENDATIONS,
IT'S UP TO YOU TO REALLY DIGEST IT AND DISCUSS IT AMONGST
COUNCIL MEMBERS AND EITHER SAY YAY OR NAY INSTEAD OF JUST
SAYING NAY IN THE SPUR OF THE MOMENT.
WE RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BUDGET BE EXPANDED, AND IN THE SPUR
OF THE MOMENT THERE WAS A FEW COUNCILMEN WHO SAID ABSOLUTELY
NOT.
SO WHEN I ASKED THE QUESTION, WHAT IS THE EXPECTATION OF
THIS COMMITTEE, AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BUDGET AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE, I ASKED THAT QUESTION BASED ON PAST
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE HAVE MADE.
RECOMMENDATIONS WHEN IT COMES TO SPENDING MONEY, EVERYONE
APPROVES.
RECOMMENDING CERTAIN -- ON CERTAIN ITEMS, IT'S BEEN NO, NAY,
WITHOUT REALLY TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION WHY WE MADE THOSE
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ASKED THOSE QUESTIONS, WHY DID YOU FEEL
THE NEED TO?
SO THAT'S REALLY WHERE I WAS GOING WITH THAT QUESTION,
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
15:03:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I'M JUST THINKING TO MYSELF, IF I IN ANY
WAY -- MAYBE A PROBLEM THAT I HAVE WITH MYSELF IS THAT I
MAYBE FEEL THAT WORTH $75 A WEEK AND I LIKE TO GIVE WHATEVER
I HAVE TO SOCIETY AND TO WHATEVER I CAN AFFORD.
HOWEVER, WHEN YOU WERE EXPLAINING, YOU TALKED IN PERSON
ABOUT THE NUMBERS, 2022 AND YOU GO LOOK AT THE 2023 BUDGET,
SO LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS, AM I CORRECT WHAT YOUR STATEMENT
WAS?
15:04:32 >> CORRECT.
YOU WANT TO LOOK AND SEE HOW THE NUMBERS ARE TRENDING.
15:04:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THEN WE WENT FROM THAT TO ADDING STAFF.
15:04:40 >> NO.
WHAT I AM SAYING IS WHEN WE MAKE THE RECOMMENDATIONS,
INSTEAD OF BEING QUICK ON CERTAIN THINGS, INSTEAD OF BEING
QUICK TO SAY NO, WHICH WAS DONE, YOU KNOW, THIS PAST YEAR,
BECAUSE IT CAME ABOUT FOUR WEEKS AGO AS PERTAINS TO YOUR
BUDGET BEING INCREASED, AND IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED THAT WE
HAD MADE THAT RECOMMENDATION AS A COMMITTEE.
BUT WHEN YOU GO BACK AND SAY THAT BASICALLY YOU HAVE -- I
DID NOT MEAN TO OFFEND ANYONE, BUT AGAIN, IT GOES BACK TO
COLLABORATION AND COOPERATION.
YOU KNOW, WE ARE HERE AS APPOINTEES, AND AS VOLUNTEERS TO DO
A JOB THAT BASICALLY THE CITY ORDINANCE AND YOUR RESOLUTION
OR THE ORDINANCE SAYS THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE A BUDGET ANALYST
TO DO ALL OF THAT.
BUT INSTEAD OF HAVING A PAID ANALYST YOU HAVE AN ADVISORY
COMMITTEE TO BASICALLY FILL THAT ROLE OF THAT BUDGET
ANALYST.
AND IF WE WERE A STAFF MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL, WOULD YOU
HAVE LISTENED TO WHAT THAT BUDGET ANALYST SAID VERSUS
LISTENED TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN PLACE, WHICH IS YOUR ADVISORY
COMMITTEE?
15:05:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WELL, I AGREE WITH YOU, AT THE SAME MOMENT
I'M HESITANT TO SAY THAT YOU ARE 100% CORRECT, BECAUSE EVEN
IF WE HAD A BUDGET ANALYST, THE SAME WAY, I APPRECIATE THAT.
EVEN IF YOU HIRE A BUDGET ANALYST THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU HAVE
TO AGREE WITH EVERYTHING HE OR SHE SAID.
THAT'S WHY I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE
SOMEONE, YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THE ADVICE OF ANYONE,
INCLUDING MYSELF TO MYSELF.
THANK YOU.
15:06:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
15:06:25 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WANT TO COMPLIMENT YOU ALSO.
I HAVE HEARD A LOT OF COMPLIMENTS ABOUT YOU AND THE
COMMITTEE.
SO THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AND EVERYONE ELSE HAS
DONE.
I READ THE CHARTER AGAIN LAST NIGHT.
CLEARLY IT SHOWS THAT WE HAVE APPROVAL OVER THE BUDGET.
AND THE MAYOR PRESENTS A BUDGET, AND WE APPROVE IT.
BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THE CHARTER WAS EVER MEANT AS A RUBBER
STAMP, AND WE SHOULDN'T BE SEEING THE BUDGET AT THE LAST
MINUTE AND APPROVING IT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT'S IN IT.
I JUST THINK THE SUMMARY LAST YEAR WAS LIKE 138 PAGES WHICH
I THINK WE ALL READ BUT THE LONGER VERSION IS LIKE A
THOUSAND PAGES.
SO HAVING A SECOND SET OF EYES TO LOOK AT IT IS HELPFUL, AND
ALSO THERE ARE THREE THINGS THAT I THINK THIS COMMITTEE
SHOULD BE LOOKING, TO GET A SECOND OPINION, SECOND IS TO
FIND WAYS TO SAVE MONEY, AND THIRD IS TO HAVE THE COUNCIL
PERSPECTIVE.
ON THE SECOND OPINION, WE ARE PRESENTED BY STAFF, BUT IT'S
GREAT TO HAVE VOLUNTEERS, ESPECIALLY WITH EXPERTISE LIKE
YOURS TO BE LOOK AT IT AND JUST TELL US WHAT YOU THINK.
YOU MIGHT SEE THINGS AND YOU HAVE.
AND YOU ARE ABLE TO GET MUCH MORE IN-DEPTH, COMMITTEE
BRIEFINGS AND EVERYTHING.
NUMBER TWO IS WAYS TO SAVE MONEY.
YOU ALL FOUND SOME WAYS TO SAVE MONEY THAT YOU SUGGESTED,
AND ANY ADMINISTRATION SHOULD NOT TAKE THAT AT CRITICAL.
IT'S JUST ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK.
CLEARLY FROM THE SCHEDULING WE HAD LAST WEEK, WE NEED TO PUT
SOME PARAMETERS AROUND THE CCNA PROCESS.
HANNA AVENUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT OUT FOR BID, AND THAT'S
SOMETHING, KNOW HO KNOWS WE COULD HAVE SAVED, MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS PROBABLY?
TOILET TO TAP, IF WE DON'T DO THAT WE'LL SAVE BILLIONS OF
DOLLARS.
SO THERE'S FISCAL IMPACT ON ALL THESE THINGS.
NUMBER THREE, THE COUNCIL PERSPECTIVE, JUST LIKE WE HAVE A
CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY, WE SHOULD HAVE THE BUDGET ADVISER,
BUT IN LIEU OF THAT WE HAVE YOU A ALL AS VOLUNTEERS TO LOOK
AT IT AND IT'S GOOD TO HAVE EYES AND EARS.
IF THE STAFF -- IT'S NOT THAT ANYBODY DID ANYTHING WRONG,
BUT THEY ARE WORKING FOR THE MAYOR.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS YOU FOUND LAST YEAR WAS $70 MILLION OF
SLUSH FUNDS.
AND I THINK REJECTED TO THAT TERM BUT WAS MONEY STASHED AWAY
THAT I THINK WE WOULD HAVE RATHER BE APPLIED TO PARKS OR
SIDEWALKS OR SOME OTHER PROJECTS THAT CONSTITUENTS -- THE
CONSTITUENTS COMPLAINING ABOUT THINGS, AND I THINK THIS
ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN WORKING A LOT BETTER WITH US THAN
THE LAST ADMINISTRATION, BUT WE HAVE GOT TO FIND WAYS TO
MORE EFFICIENTLY USE THE MONEY.
BUT FOR SURE THE PUBLIC DOESN'T WANT US TO RAISE TAXES, AND
A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE UPSET BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO ARE NEW HERE
DIDN'T REALIZE THAT THE PERSON BEFORE THEM WAS HOMESTEADED
AND THEY ARE MAD BECAUSE THEY THINK WE RAISED OUR TAXES EVEN
THOUGH WE DIDN'T, AND PEOPLE ARE UPSET BECAUSE THE VALUES OF
THEIR HOMES HAVE GONE UP AND THEIR TAXES HAVE GONE UP.
I THINK IT'S OUR DUTY TO DO A FORENSIC AUDIT JUST SO WE HAVE
A SECOND OPINION.
I MEAN, BOARDS DO THAT WITH NONPROFITS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES.
NOT THAT WE DON'T TRUST ANYBODY, BUT JUST HELPS EVERYBODY
FEEL COMFORTABLE.
THE LAST THING I WILL SAY IS THAT SINCE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE
APPROVAL, THE FINAL APPROVAL ON THE BUDGET, ONE OF THE
QUESTIONS EVERY MAYOR ASKS IS, THEY COME TO CITY COUNCIL AND
THEY SAY, WHAT DO YOU WANT?
WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM YOUR DISTRICT?
AND THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION FOR EVERY CITY COUNCIL
MEMBER SHOULD BE NOTHING, I DON'T WANT ANYTHING, AND THAT'S
WHAT I HAVE SAID FOR THREE YEARS.
I DON'T WANT ANYTHING FOR MY DISTRICT.
WHY?
BECAUSE ONCE YOU DO THAT, THE WAY SOME MAYORS DO IT IS THEY
GIVE YOU THAT, AND THEN THEY THINK THEY CONTROL YOUR VOTE
AFTER THAT.
WHY SHOULD YOU DO THAT, LIKE ORLANDO GUDES SAID A COUPLE
YEARS AGO, ASK FOR A MILLION DOLLARS FOR A PARK IN YOUR
DISTRICT.
IF HE HAD ASKED THE MAYOR FOR $200,000 FOR A PARK HE WOULD
HAVE TO NEGOTIATE BACK AND FORTH AND COME TO ASK CITY
COUNCIL FOR A MILLION DOLLARS FOR A PARK.
THEN HE DOESN'T HAVE TO GIVE UP ALL HIS OTHER VOTES FOR
HAVING NEGOTIATED THAT.
AND I THINK KNOWING MORE ABOUT THE BUDGET AND KNOWING ABOUT
OUR COLLEAGUES AND HOW WE WANT TO SUPPORT EACH OTHER AND HOW
THE BUDGET IS PUT TOGETHER, THERE'S A LOT OF POWER IN CITY
COUNCIL.
IT'S NOT THAT -- WE HAVE A STRONG MAYOR AND ALL THAT
TECHNICALLY KNEADS MEANS IS THAT THE MAYOR DOESN'T SIT ON
CITY COUNCIL.
IT DOESN'T MEAN WE HAVE A DICTATORSHIP.
IF THE MAYOR ASKS US WHAT YOU WANT, IT SHOULD BE NO.
ASK CITY COUNCIL INSTEAD.
ASK CITY COUNCIL TO PUT IT IN THE BUDGET.
MAKE A MOTION TO CITY COUNCIL AND WE'LL SUPPORT EACH OTHER
AND THEN WE DON'T HAVE TO SELL OUR VOTES.
THANK YOU.
15:11:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
15:11:08 >>LUIS VIERA:
I APPRECIATE THAT.
AND I WANTED -- COUNCILMAN CARLSON SAID SOME VERY GREAT
THINGS I AGREE WITH AND DISSENT ON THE I SHALL OF DISTRICTS
AND ASKING FOR FUNDS.
I WILL GIVE YOU TWO EXAMPLES AND MAYBE OTHER PEOPLE READ IT
DIFFERENT.
I AM JUST SPEAKING FOR LUIS VIERA HERE.
I REMEMBER FIRE STATION 13 AND HELPED FIRE STATION 13.
I APPROACHED THE ADMINISTRATION ON HELP FOR FIRE STATION 13.
I WORKED ON IT AND WORKED WITH JOE GRECO, THEN PRESIDENT OF
TAMPA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 754.
I EVEN DID A SPEND THE NIGHT AT STATION 13 TO ILLUSTRATE AND
PUT PRESSURE ON ALL STAKEHOLDERS ON HOW WE NEED ANOTHER FIRE
STATION, BECAUSE THAT'S THE BUSIEST FIRE STATION IN THE CITY
OF TAMPA, ONE OF THE 50th OR SO BUSY STATIONS IN THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
SO I WORKED TOWARDS THAT, BUILT TOWARDS THAT OVER A YEAR, A
LOT OF WORK, AND ELECTED OFFICIAL, YOU TAKE ANOTHER ONE, THE
DISABILITY PARK.
THAT STARTED BACK IN 2017 AND I SAID, HEY, LOOK, I WOULD
LIKE TO HAVE $50,000 IN THE BUDGET FOR DESIGN FOR THAT PARK,
AND THEN I WILL LEAVE IT TO THE NEXT MAYOR TO WORK WITH IT.
WE GOT THAT IN.
IT DIDN'T GET IN THE BUDGET IN 19.
GOT PART OF IT IN 20, PART OF IN 21, TOOK ABOUT FOUR YEARS
OF LOBBYING.
I NEVER TRADED VOTES.
IT WAS SOMETHING FROM MY HEART.
AND TWO OF THE BIG ISSUES I FEEL A LOT ABOUT ARE FIRST
RESPONDERS AND DISABILITIES.
SO AGAIN, THERE ARE DIFFERENT WAYS, AND NOBODY IS RIGHT,
NOBODY IS WRONG, IT'S JUST MY WAY, I GUESS, IF YOU WILL.
SO IN THAT REGARD.
BUT I ALSO WANTED TO AGREE WITH WHAT A LOT OF FOLKS SAID
INCLUDING COUNCIL CARLSON, GUDES ANDS OTHERS ABOUT THE WORK
OF YOU ALL'S COMMITTEE THAT YOU WORK OBVIOUSLY, AND CORRECT
ME IF I AM WRONG, YOU DON'T GET PAID, RIGHT?
15:12:58 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
15:12:59 >>LUIS VIERA:
AND IT'S OBVIOUS YOU PUT A LOT OF TIME INTO
IT SO I THINK THAT'S A GOOD THING.
WITHOUT A DOUBT.
YOU KNOW, I REMEMBER ONE TIME -- AND TO ILLUSTRATE THE VIEW
THAT I THINK OF THIS COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DOING, YOU GO BACK
TO OUR DISCUSSION IN 2017 ON THE MILLAGE, YOUR COMMITTEE,
HAD RECOMMENDED, I THINK, IT WAS .9 RAISE IN THE MILLAGE.
WE WOUND UP RAISING IT.475 I THINK IT WHATS THAT YEAR, BY
ONE VOTE.
IT WAS A 4-3 VOTE.
SO THIS COMMITTEE CAME OUT AND TASKED THEM WITH THE DUTY,
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS WHEN IT PERTAINS TO FUTURE
REVENUE?
YOU ALL CAME OUT WITH A VERY CONTROVERSIAL POSITION THAT BY
THE WAY NO ONE ON COUNCIL EVER THOUGHT, I THINK WE BEGAN
WITH .6, IF I RECALL, IF MEMORY SERVES ME RIGHT.
SO IT IS UP TO YOU ALL TO GO OUT THERE AND BE TASKED WITH
THINGS.
ONE THING I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU ALL TO DO CONSISTENT WITH
WHAT I SAID ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY IS ABOUT HOW DO WE GET MONEY
INTO THE BUDGET THROUGH VARIOUS MEANS FOR OUR PUBLIC SAFETY
NEEDS?
YOU SPOKE VERY WELL ABOUT THE FACT WE ARE A BIG GROWING CITY
AND WHATNOT.
WE HAVE OBVIOUS CHALLENGES IN NORTH AND NEW TAMPA, CONTINUES
TO HAVE CHALLENGES IN EAST TAMPA, WEST TAMPA WITH ALL THAT
WORKFORCE HOUSING CONTINUES TO GROW, WE ARE GOING TO NEED
MORE FIRE STATIONS AND POLICE OFFICERS OUT THERE.
DOWNTOWN TAMPA, YOU SEE ALL THE GROWTH WE HAVE HAD IN 10 OR
12 YEARS.
NO NEW FIRE STATIONS THERE.
THE ISSUE IS HOW ARE WE GOING TO BUILD THAT BRIDGE
FINANCIALLY TO PAY FOR THE THINGS THAT WE NEED, NOT THAT WE
WANT.
THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE WANTS THAT WE NEED.
SO MAYBE THAT'S SOMETHING YOU ALL COULD WORK ON.
I WOULD SUGGEST WHICH IS TO LOOK AT PUBLIC SAFETY AND TO
LOOK AT HOW TO FUND THAT IN THE FUTURE.
WHAT CAN WE USE FOR THAT?
SO, IN OTHER WORDS, TO THE EXTENT THAT PEOPLE MAY DISAGREE,
BECAUSE I DID NOT SUPPORT THE IDEA OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS, HOW
MUCH MORE ARE YOU ALL ASKING FOR CITY COUNCIL?
15:14:47 >> WE WEREN'T ASKING FOR IT.
WE ARE RECOMMENDING.
15:14:51 >>LUIS VIERA:
SO.
15:14:52 >> SO LET ME TOUCH ON YOUR STATEMENTS, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
YOU KNOW, WE HAVE DONE JUST THAT.
I BELIEVE THAT WHEN WE PRESENTED FOR FY 22, AT THE TIME,
CHAIRMAN GUDES ADVISED MYSELF, CHAIRMAN GUDES ADVISED MYSELF
AND CFO IN THE DEPARTMENT OFFICE GO BACK TO THE DRAWING
BOARD, AND WE DID THAT.
AND WHEN WE WENT BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD WITH THE BUDGET
OFFICE, ONE OF THE THINGS WE ASKED FOR WAS 2.6 MILLION OF
STAFF LEVEL INCREASES FOR THE CITY.
WE ASKED FOR ADDITIONAL -- WE ACTUALLY SAID, TAKE THAT 5
MILLION OFF THE MONEY AND ALLOCATE IT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
SO WE WENT BACK AND WE MET WITH THE BUDGET OFFICER.
AND MR. PERRY IS NOT HERE, AND HE WANTS TO GET ON THE LINE,
BUT WE MET, AND MR. PERRY ACTUALLY CAME BACK AND SAID
INSTEAD OF 2.6 MILLION WE FOUND AN ADDITIONAL 3 MILLION, SO
WE CAN ADD INSTEAD OF 2.6 WE CAN DO 5 MONTE 6, ALL RIGHT?
AND THEN WHEN IT CAME TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING WHEN WE ASKED
FOR FIVE OF THE MONEY THAT WAS GOING TO SOLID WASTE,
REDIRECT IT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING, MR. PERRY CAME BACK AND
SAID IF OUR 14.8 MILLION OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUND.
SO WHEN IT COMES TO -- WE ARE NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THE
MILLION DOLLARS COUNCIL BUDGET INCREASING.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT -- WHEN WE LOOK AT EVERYTHING AS A
COMMITTEE, AND WE DISCUSS IT, AND WHEN WE COME UP AND WE
PRESENT, THAT'S BECAUSE WE HAVE -- WE WENT THROUGH A
THOROUGH PROCESS TO ARRIVE AT THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE
PRESENT TO COUNCIL.
AND IF YOU GO BACK TWO YEARS, WE HAVE ASKED WE HAVE STATED,
PD NEEDED TO UPGRADE THEIR FLEET.
IT'S AN EYESORE OUT ON THE STREET.
THEY SHOULD NOTE BE DRIVING AROUND OLD CROWN VICTORIAS.
SO WHEN THEY WERE LOOKING AT THE BODY CAMS, WE CAME AND
SAID, LET'S GET IT DONE.
SO WE ADVOCATE FOR EVERYTHING THAT WE SEE BECAUSE WE HAVE
DONE A DEEP DIVE.
I WOULDN'T SAY A DEEP DIVE.
WE HAVE DONE LEAN DIVES.
IF YOU ARE IN THE COMMUNITY WHICH I AM, THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE
BEEN DOING, AND WE ARE TRYING TO DO MORE OF A DEEPER DIVE SO
WE HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AS IT PERTAINS TO HOW THE
ADMINISTRATION FORMULATES THEIR BUDGET AND COMES TO COUNCIL
AND SAYS, THIS IS WHAT WE NEED FOR THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR.
SO RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE BEEN -- WE HAVE BEEN TRACKING, BUT WE
HAVEN'T BEEN TRACKING AT THE PACE THAT WE REALLY NEED TO,
AND IN ORDER TO MAKE THE BEST SOUND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THIS
COUNCIL, TO APPROVE THE BUDGET.
FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA TO OPERATE, WE NEED MORE TIME WITH THE
DEPARTMENTS, OR WITH THE BUDGET OFFICE, SO THAT WE CAN
UNDERSTAND HOW THEY ARE CONSTRUCTING THEIR BUDGET AS
PERTAINS TO THE ECONOMICS OF THE CITY.
15:18:05 >>LUIS VIERA:
AND IF I MAY.
AGAIN, I GUESS MY POINT ON THAT IS IF ANY OF US DISAGREE
WITH ANY OF YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS, JUST LIKE COUNCIL MEMBERS
DISAGREED WITH THAT MILLAGE RATE, I PROMISE YOU, IT COMES
AFTER A LOT OF THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION, AS WELL AS, I HOPE
FROM ALL OF US, DIFFERENCE DEFERENCE TO THE TIME THAT YOU
ARE PUTTING IN WITHOUT COMPENSATION, WHICH WE ARE ALL
APPRECIATIVE FOR.
THANK YOU.
15:18:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
AND I KNOW --
15:18:37 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I'M STILL PRETTY NEW AT THIS BUT IF YOU ASK
WHAT I WANT, I THINK MR. VIERA, COUNCILMAN VIERA HAD A VERY
GOOD POINT OF YOUR SAYING THAT YOU HAD RECOMMENDED A .9
MILLAGE RATE, WHICH PREVIOUS COUNCILS HAD.
AND WHAT I WOULD REALLY LOVE TO SEE IS SORT OF LIKE A DREAM,
AND THEN SOMETHING MORE REALISTIC.
IF WE HAVE THE MONEY THIS IS WHAT I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO
SEE, BUT IF WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY, THIS IS WHERE WE
REALLY, REALLY NEED TO SPEND IT.
AND I KNOW THAT'S REALLY NOT MY DESIRE BUT I WOULD LOVE TO
SEE, IF WE HAVE THE FUNDS, WHAT DOES THE BUDGET COMMITTEE
REALLY WANT TO SEE?
15:19:25 >> I THINK THAT WE ARE HERE AS IT STATES ON THE AGENDA, AND
WE DON'T WANT TO GO BACK TO YESTERDAY.
THIS IS TODAY.
SO HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD?
AND I THINK THAT MYSELF AND THE CFO, WE ARE ON THE SAME
PAGE.
WE WANT TO BE COLLABORATIVE AND WORK TOGETHER.
AND BE MORE -- THIS COMMITTEE BE MORE INVOLVED AS PERTAINS
TO MONITORING THE BUDGET.
AND BRINGING THINGS TO THE CFO'S ATTENTION, AND TO ACHIEVE
THE STAFF'S ATTENTION, AND UPDATING COUNCIL AS TO WHERE THE
CURRENT BUDGET IS SO WHEN THE NEW BUDGET IS BEING
CONSTRUCTED, AND BEING APPROVED FOR OPERATION, THAT
EVERYBODY IS ON THE SAME PAGE.
I THINK IF YOU GO BACK TO THE RESOLUTION, THAT'S WHAT THIS
COMMITTEE IS.
THIS COMMITTEE IS -- IT'S A FISCAL HELP COMMITTEE.
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMICS OF THE CITY, AND YOU
DON'T UNDERSTAND BUDGETS, THEN YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME.
15:20:38 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
15:20:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, COUNCILMAN CARLSON,
AND THEN MR. ROGERO.
15:20:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SINCE I HAVE YOU MR. ROGERO AND MR.
JOHNSON BOTH IN FRONT OF US, I THINK YOU HAVE ONE MORE BITE
AT THE C.I.T. TAX AND THEN IT'S FINI.
IN 2026, IT ENDS, AM I CORRECT?
SO YOU HAVE ONE MORE BITE.
WHAT WAS THE LAST AMOUNT OF THAT WE TOOK IN, DO YOU
REMEMBER?
NOT ACTUAL FIGURES.
A ROUNDABOUT.
A MILLION DOLLARS, WHATEVER IT WAS?
WHAT I AM SAYING IS THIS.
YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A NEED NOT ONLY TODAY FOR REPLACE OF
VEHICLES, A R AND THE REPLACEMENT OF VEHICLES TODAY, A FIRE
TRUCK COST YOU $800,000.
AND MAYBE MORE.
AND YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE TRANSPORT, AN AMBULANCE COST YOU
FIVE TIMES MORE THAN IT WAS WHEN YOU FIRST BOUGHT IT.
SO EVEN IF YOU HAVE A BUMP UP BECAUSE OF THE VALLEY, YOU
LOOK AT THE VALUE, YOU ARE GOING TO BE STATUS QUO AND MAYBE
A LITTLE BEHIND.
AND YOU KNOW AND ALL OF US KNOW ALL THE MONEY COLLECTED IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA, TAXATION INCLUDING HOMES AND BUILDINGS
AND EVERYTHING ELSE, DOES NOT COVER, AS YOU WELL KNOW, AS
YOU WELL KNOW BOTH OF YOU, THE COST OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
AND IT'S STILL ABOUT 50 MILLION.
I AM GOING TO BE 50 MILLION SHORT IN COVERING, WHICH IS WELL
NEEDED AND IT'S PUBLIC SAFETY.
THAT'S THE PUBLIC NEEDS, NUMBER ONE.
SO WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IS BETWEEN YOU GENTLEMEN, BOTH THE
CITY AND THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
GET TOGETHER AND FIND OUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WHEN THAT
C.I.T. MONEY RUNS OUT IN 2026, AND WHERE IS THIS CITY GOING
TO BE NO MATTER WHO IS SITTING ON THAT SIDE OF THE AISLE OR
THIS SIDE OF THE OIL AS COUNCIL, WHAT ARE THE TAXPAYERS
GOING TO DO AND HOW ARE WE GOING TO HANDLE THE REPLACEMENT
OF VEHICLES AT ONE COST?
BECAUSE NOW ELECTRIC VEHICLES CERTAINLY HAVE A LOT OF LESS
REPAIRS BUT THEY ARE GOING TO BE A LOT MORE COSTLY.
BECAUSE I SEE NOW WHAT'S HAPPENING, AND WHY IS IT GOING TO
COST MORE, AND YOU GO BUY ONE NOW, 5 OR 10,000 OVER, EVEN
SOME OF THE MANUFACTURERS ARE TELLING DEALERS, DON'T DO
THIS, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THE DEALERSHIP AWAY FROM YOU.
AND THAT'S HAPPENED ALREADY TO TWO LARGE MANUFACTURERS IN
THIS COUNTRY.
SO IT'S COMING TO THE POINT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO GET -- TO
GO AND ACHIEVE IT AND WE BETTER HAVE A PLAN PAST 2026 REAL
QUICK.
BECAUSE IF WE DON'T DO THAT, WHOEVER SITS ON THIS SIDE OF
THE AISLE OR THAT SIDE OF THE AISLE IT'S GOING TO BE UP THE
CREEK WITHOUT A PADDLE, AS THEY USED TO SAY.
BOTH OF YOU GENTLEMEN, THE CURRENT MAYOR AND THE CURRENT
COUNCIL, HAS TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE ARE GOING TO DO THESE
THINGS, AND HOW WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE
SERVICE LEVEL THAT THE PUBLIC EXPECTS, BECAUSE WE ARE WAY
BEHIND ON MANUFACTURING THE COST OF MONEY TO DO THE ROADS
THAT WE NEED.
THE NUMBER ONE COMPLAINT THAT WE RECEIVE, WHEN YOU PAVE THE
ROAD, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.
AND THESE THINGS ARE COMING.
YOU HAVE THE PIPES PROGRAM GOING AT THE SAME TIME THAT YOU
HAVE TO REPAIR THE ROADS.
CAN'T REPAIR THE ROADS UNTIL YOU PUT THE PIPES -- I MEAN,
THIS IS ME THINKING.
I DO.
HOW ARE YOU GOING TO TEAR UP THE ROAD AND THEN TEAR IT UP
AGAIN TO PUT THE PIPES IN AND THEN COVER IT AGAIN?
YOU CAN'T DO THAT, BECAUSE IT'S DOUBLE THE COST.
AND THESE COST, WHAT IT'S COSTING THE CITY, AND YOU ARE
GOING TO HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT PERCENT OVER 2023, 2022 IS
GOING TO JUMP, BECAUSE NOW YOU CAN'T TELL ME IGNORE IT.
CAN TELL YOU WHAT AN AIRPLANE IS GOING TO COST BECAUSE NO
ONE CAN TELL YOU THE PRICES AND YOU GO TO THE STORE NOW, YOU
YEAH, THEY GOT MILK, BUT THE MILK HAS -- NOT THE PLASTIC BUT
THE SQUARE TYPE, THEY ARE OUT.
I DON'T SEE IT AT WALMART.
I DON'T SEE IT AT A LOT OF PLACES.
SO THERE ARE GOING TO BE SOME SHORTAGES IN THIS COUNTRY.
BUT I CAN GUARANTEE BY LOOKING AT THE SHELF, AND THE BIG
COMPANIES LIKE PUBLIX AND WALMART, THERE'S SOMETHING COMING
IN THIS COUNTRY.
MY FEELING IS, YOU GUYS, ALL OF YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF
BOTH COMMITTEES AND THE CITY, HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S
GOING TO HAPPEN, HOW YOU ARE GOING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE
CITY WITHOUT THE CIP BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THE PUBLIC IS
GOING TO VOTE FOR CIP.
15:25:22 >> IF I CAN SPEAK ON THAT.
YOU KNOW, BEING IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR RATHER THAN BEING IN
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, ONE OF THE THINGS ABOUT THE PRIVATE
SECTOR IS WHEN I GO BACK TO MONITORING YOUR BUDGET, YOU ARE
ALWAYS MONITORING -- WE YOU LOOK AT THE PUBLIC, THERE'S NO
SLIGHT TO ANYONE IN A POSITION, BUT THE REALITY IS, FROM THE
LOCAL, STATE, TO FEDERAL, YOU KNOW, YOU ARE WRITING A CHECK
FROM BEHIND RATHER THAN WRITING A CHECK OUT FRONT.
AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
THAT MEANS WRITING A CHECK OUT FRONT, I AM ACTUALLY WORKING
AT MY PROFITS AND MY LOSS AND I HAVE TO SAY, I HAD MORE
GOING OUT THAN I HAD COMING IN, WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF THAT?
AND IN YOU GO BACK TO 2004, 2005 WHEN DELTA AIRLINES HAD TO
FILE BANKRUPTCY SOME SAY IT WAS BECAUSE OF FUEL BUT I CAN
TELL YOU IT WAS NOT BECAUSE OF FUEL, IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE
MISMANAGEMENT OF THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS THE --
THAT SHOULD HAVE COST THE CONE $650, THEY WERE BEING CHARGED
$1600 AND THERE WAS NO MEASUREMENTS IN PLACE TO MONITOR
THAT.
SO WHAT HAPPENED WAS YOUR OVERSPENDING FOR ITEMS THAT YOU
SHOULD NOT BE OVERSPENDING ON.
AND THAT ALSO SEEPS OVER TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR WHERE YOU PUT
THESE CONTRACTS OUT FOR BID.
AGAIN, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT -- I AM JUST GIVING AN
EXAMPLE.
PUTTING THESE CONTRACTS OUT TO BID AND WHAT HAPPENS IS, IT'S
DETERMINED AT THIS PRICE, AND YOU SAY IT'S COMPETITIVE, BUT
IT REALLY IS NOT COMPETITIVE, RIGHT?
BECAUSE YOU ARE OVERPAYING FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU SHOULD NOT
BE OVERPAYING FOR, BUT YOU ARE OVERPAYING FOR IT BECAUSE YOU
ARE A GOVERNMENT ENTITY.
AND I THINK WHEN IT COMES TO CIT, WHEN IT RUNS OUT IN 2026,
THE WAY TO OVERCOME THAT IS TO MONITOR YOUR SPENDING.
AND MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE BEING COMPETITIVE WITH THE
SERVICES THAT YOU ARE CONTRACTING OUT.
ESPECIALLY AS PERTAINS TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN, AS IT PERTAINS
TO SECURITY, OR WHATEVER.
WHATEVER SERVICES YOU ARE CONTRACTING OUT, YOU NEED TO MAKE
SURE THAT YOU ARE REALLY GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR
BUCK.
AND THAT'S NOT PERFORMANCE, THAT IS WHAT IS IT GOING FOR IN
THE PRIVATE SECTOR, RIGHT?
IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, WE DO THIS EVERY DAY.
WE GET THREE BIDS, WE LOOK AT IT AND MAKE SURE IT'S
COMPETITIVE TO WHAT WE NEED.
THAT'S HOW YOU CAN OVERCOME --
15:27:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
ONE LAST THING AND I WILL FINISH, PLEASE.
HAVE YOU GUYS IN YOUR COMMITTEE EVER DISCUSSED ANYTHING
ABOUT -- I AM NOT ANTI-SPORTS.
I AM ANTI-BUILDING FOR SPORTS.
THERE'S A VAST DIFFERENCE.
AND YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CONSIDERATION WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN,
BECAUSE IF IT DOES HAPPEN, THERE'S A -- I TALKED ABOUT THIS
SOME TIME BACK, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AND HOW DOES THAT AFFECT
THE BUDGET?
YOU ALL KNOW IT'S SOMETHING STANDARD, AND FOR THE NEXT 30
YEARS, THE DEVELOPER RIGHTS GIVEN AWAY.
THESE ARE THINGS YOUR COMMITTEE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT, IN MY
OPINION, TO FIND OUT WHERE WE STAND AND MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS.
AND I REALLY WOULD BE APPRECIATIVE OF WHATEVER YOU COME UP
WITH BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT IS NEEDED.
SOMETHING WITHOUT YOU CAN'T LIVE.
SO IT'S ABOUT THE PUBLIC NECESSITATES FIRST AND ONLY FIRST.
AFTER THAT, I AM NOT WILLING TO GIVE IT AWAY.
I AM WILLING TO HELP BUT I AM NOT GOING TO GIVE DEVELOPMENT
RIGHTS WHEN THEY SAY THEY ARE GOING TO PAY ME BACK WITH MY
MONEY ON THE 50% THEN ASK BE ME FOR THE 50%, AND AFTER THEY
ARE GETTING IT TO ARE FREE.
NOT ONLY THAT BUT THERE'S ANOTHER CONTRACT COMING UP NOW, I
BELIEVE ENDS IN 2026.
EVERYTHING ENDS IN 2026.
THE BIG STADIUM.
DOWN ON DALE MABRY.
2026.
15:29:24 >> I BELIEVE SO.
THE TIMING IS VERY CLOSE.
15:29:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE TIMING IS GOING TO BE ESSENTIALLY
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, BECAUSE IT DEPENDS ON WHAT WE DO, AND
FROM WHAT I HEAR YOU ARE LOOKING AT SOMETHING OVER A HALF
BILLION DOLLARS.
SO JUST BE PREPARED.
AND YOU AND I -- I AM TRYING TO BE JOKING ABOUT SOMETHING
THAT'S VERY SERIOUS.
IT'S ABOUT SOMETHING THAT IF WE DIDN'T HAVE ALL THESE DENTS,
WE MAY NOT HAVE THE PROBLEM WE HAVE TODAY, AND AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
15:29:59 >> THAT'S WHERE THE COMMITTEE COMES INTO PLAY.
15:30:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU CAN DO.
15:30:04 >>BILL CARLSON:
JUST QUICKLY.
YESTERDAY, THE MAYOR HAD A PRESS CONFERENCE ON
ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY.
MOST OF THE COMMENTS SHE MADE WERE ABOUT CITY COUNCIL.
BUT I FEEL LIKE WE ARE PRETTY TRANSPARENT AND ACCOUNTABLE.
WE ARE HEARING FROM THE PUBLIC TWO OR THREE TIMES A WEEK.
THE PUBLIC WIND UP AS THEY DID THIS MORNING, AND THEY BLAST
HALF OR MOST OF US EVERY WEEK.
SO WE HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THE PUBLIC.
WE GET E-MAILS, CALLS, WE ARE OUT IN THE COMMUNITY IN THE
PUBLIC ALL THE TIME, AND WE ARE DIRECTLY ACCOUNTABLE TO THE
PUBLIC.
WHAT I HEAR THE MOST, A REQUEST, IS MORE TRANSPARENCY FOR
THE ADMINISTRATION, AND NOT JUST THIS ADMINISTRATION BUT ANY
ADMINISTRATION, BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DOESN'T SEE THE INNER
WORKINGS OF IT.
AND YOU HAVE SEEN HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO NAVIGATE THE INSIDE
OF IT.
AND I KNOW YOU ALL HAVE HAD SOME PUSHBACK ON SOME MEETINGS
AND SOMEBODY QUESTIONS YOU ALL HAVE ASKED.
BUT WHAT I WOULD DO IF I WERE YOU ALL, I WOULD PRINT OUT THE
HEADLINES FROM TODAY'S ARTICLES THAT SAY MAYOR CASTOR WANTS
ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY AND SHOW THEM AND HOPEFULLY
CHIEF OF STAFF WILL BACK YOU UP AND SAY THIS IS WHAT THE
MAYOR WANTS, THIS IS WHAT SHE SAID TO THE PUBLIC SHE WANTS,
SO WHAT'S WRONG WITH ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS?
IF WE DISAGREE THAT'S FINE.
WE ARE NOT TRYING TO DO A WITCH HUNT TO TRY TO FIND SOMEBODY
DOING SOMETHING WRONG.
WE ARE JUST TRYING TO GET ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS.
AND TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FROM ADMINISTRATION TO
YOUR COMMITTEE IS TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY TOWARD US
AND TOWARD THE PUBLIC, BECAUSE YOU ALL REPRESENT THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE, AS YOU KNOW YOU ALL NETWORK AND ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE
IN THE COMMUNITY, AND CAN BE AMBASSADORS.
AND IF WE HAPPEN TO DISAGREE WITH SOMETHING THE
ADMINISTRATION IS DOING, THAT'S FINE.
WE SHOULD ALL BE ABLE TO AGREE TO DISAGREE.
BUT AS LONG AS EVERYBODY IS TRANSPARENT AND ACCOUNTABLE.
THANK YOU.
15:31:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MR. ROGERO.
15:31:58 >>DENNIS ROGERO:
DENNIS ROGERO, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER.
CONGRATULATIONS, MA'AM, BEFORE I FORGET.
I DIDN'T STEP OVER HERE TO GET INTO ANY DISCUSSION OR CUT
SHORT ANY QUESTIONS.
MR. JOHNSON REFERENCED IT A COUPLE OF TIMES AND SAID A
STATEMENT THAT I AGREE, I THINK PHILOSOPHICALLY WE ARE ON
THE SAME PAGE.
OF COURSE, COUNCILMAN CARLSON, MR. JOHNSON AND I HAD
DISCUSSION, MET WITH CHIEF OF STAFF, WANT TO THANK MR.
SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL FOR FACILITATING MANY DISCUSSIONS IN
THE BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THIS MEETING.
AND THE REASON I BRING ALL THIS UP IS I THINK THIS MOTION IS
VERY WELL TIMED.
SO I AM GLAD YOU MADE IT.
I THINK WE ARE WELL POSITIONED FROM A TINY PERSPECTIVE TO GO
FORWARD IN NOT ONLY MONITORING THE CURRENT YEAR BUDGET BUT
THE 23 BUDGET.
AGAIN AS YOU RECALL COUNCIL'S BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
TYPICALLY STARTS WITH OUR PRESENTATIONS TO YOU NEXT MONTH AT
THE MIDYEAR REVIEW.
THAT'S GOING TO COINCIDE VERY CLOSELY WITH THE CITIZEN
ADVISORY COMMITTEE'S NEXT MEETING.
I THINK THAT'S VERY WELL TIMED.
WE WILL BRING TO YOU WHERE WE THINK WE ARE IN THIS YEAR.
WE'LL HAVE ABOUT A HALF OF THE YEAR'S INFORMATION.
WE'LL BRING YOU WHERE WE THINK WE ARE GOING.
AGAIN NICELY COINCIDING WITH THE NEXT MEETING OF THE
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
WE'LL ALSO SHARE INSIGHTS AS TO HOW WE FINISHED LAST YEAR.
AGAIN WHEN COUNCIL ADOPTS THE BUDGET IN SEPTEMBER, WE ARE
STILL NOT OUT OF THE FISCAL YEAR.
WE ARE JUST LEAVING AND IT TAKES MOMENTS TO CLOSE THE BOOKS
OUT, AS IT WERE.
SO IT'S WELL TIMED.
I THIS I WE ARE WELL PLACED GOING FORWARD, WITH A REGULAR
PERIODIC SCHEDULE.
SOUND LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT A MONTH FOR NOT ONLY
REVIEW INTERNALLY FROM THE ADMINISTRATION'S PERSPECTIVE,
REVIEW EXTERNALLY BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND IF
YOU WILL RECALL LAST YEAR, THAT'S ALSO THE KICKOFF FOR OUR
ONE-ON-ONE MEETINGS WITH EACH OF YOU, TO INQUIRE AS TO WHAT
YOUR PRIORITIES ARE.
LAST YEAR EACH COUNCILMEMBER HAD AT LEAST ONE, ONE ON ONE
MEETING.
SOME OF YOU WANTED MORE SO WE HAD MORE.
YOU WILL ALSO RECALL YOU ADDED A BUDGET WORKSHOP LAST YEAR
IN AUGUST, IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN.
THE FEEDBACK I GOT FROM THAT WORKSHOP WAS VERY POSITIVE.
I THOUGHT IT WAS VERY USEFUL.
IT ALLOWED US TO TRANSITION FROM THE INITIAL ONE-ON-ONE
MEETINGS WITH YOUR INPUT TO MEET WITH YOU AGAIN AFTER YOU
RECEIVED THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET, AND ADDITIONAL.
FURTHER TO THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AS MR. JOHNSON
AND YOU ALL REFERENCED, THEY HAVE GOT A LONG HISTORY OF
PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS THAT
EITHER ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET,
OR EVENTUALLY ARE INCORPORATED AS YOU ADOPT THE BUDGET IN
SEPTEMBER.
WE WANT TO SEE THAT CONTINUE, AND IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE GOT
MORE THAN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF TIME TO PLAN FOR THAT
THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS, SO WE CAN ALL ARRIVE AT THAT
DESTINATION WHERE THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE FED IN -- AS MR.
VIERA POINTED OUT, YOU DON'T ALWAYS AGREE WITH THE CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND WE DON'T ALWAYS AGREE WITH THE
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND COUNCIL WANT ALWAYS AGREE
WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, BUT AT LEAST IF WE SURFACE THE
INFORMATION, IF WE VETTED IT AND STICK TO IT FROM A
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE, THEN I THINK ALL PARTIES HAVE DONE
THEIR JOB.
SO I APPRECIATE YOUR WORK, THE WORK OF THE COMMITTEE, AND
PHILOSOPHICALLY WHERE WE ARE HEADING.
I WOULD ALSO BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T THINK CHIEF OF STAFF FOR
HIS PARTICIPATION AND DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY MORRIS MASSEY.
HAVING SAID THAT, I'M PREPARED TO TAKE INPUT NOW, TAKE INPUT
ON WHAT YOUR OPERATORS ARE WHEN YOU WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN
SHARING MORE INFORMATION WITH US, WHEN YOU WOULD LIKE TO
BEGIN MEETINGS, ET CETERA, AND BE PREPARED FOR THAT
THROUGHOUT THE BUDGET PROCESS.
15:36:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
15:36:22 >>JOE JOHNSON:
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO NEED FROM A
COMMITTEE STANDPOINT IS A LITTLE MORE SUPPORT.
I THINK WE NEED, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE WHO CAN KEEP UP WITH THE
MINUTES, OKAY.
WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A DESIGNATED PLACE TO
MEET.
SO WE NEED A LITTLE MORE ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR THE
COMMITTEE.
RIGHT NOW, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, ONE PERSON TRYING TO DO IT ALL,
IT'S A LITTLE CHALLENGING.
BUT IT GETS DONE, BUT I THINK ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE
COMMITTEE FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE STANDPOINT, DEFINITELY --
15:37:12 >>> I WILL COLLABORATE WITH THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF STAFF,
CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY, MY LEGISLATIVE AIDE.
OF COURSE, THE CHAIR OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE, AND LET'S SEE
WHAT WE CAN DO TO OFFER BETTER SUPPORT.
AGAIN, THE CITY IS GROWING.
I DON'T HAVE TO TELL YOU.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
15:37:32 >> COUNCIL, I DO THANK YOU.
15:37:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IT'S GOING TO RAIN IN THE NEXT 45
MINUTES.
YOU ARE GOING TO BE TRAPPED.
15:37:42 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WASN'T HERE WHEN THE COMMITTEE WAS
CREATED AND I AM NOT TRYING TO START A BIG FIGHT, BUT I
WONDER, YOU KNOW, IN TRYING TO PROMOTE COLLABORATION, COULD
WE MODIFY THE MAKEUP OF THE COMMITTEE TO ADD TWO APPOINTEES
FROM THE MAYOR?
OR IS THAT TOO DIFFICULT?
15:38:07 >> IF I CAN ADDRESS THAT.
THIS COMMITTEE WAS CREATED IN 2008 AND THE RESOLUTION WAS
ENDED IN 2011.
COUNCIL DIDN'T HAVE A COPY OF IT TODAY.
I DIDN'T KNOW WE WERE GOING TO GO THIS FAR IN DEPTH WITH
THAT.
BUT OBVIOUSLY AN ELEVEN-YEAR-OLD RESOLUTION NEEDS TO BE
REVISITED AND BROUGHT UP TO SPEED AND WE HAVE TO APPLY IT
CONSISTENTLY.
IF YOU WANT TO HAVE THE KIND OF SUPPORT THAT WAS TALKED
ABOUT, THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS RAISED BY THE COMMITTEE,
IS THE FACT THAT IF YOU DO WANT TO MAKE IT WITH THE MAYORAL
APPOINTMENT, AND EXPAND THIS, AND GET THE SUPPORT YOU NEED,
YOU CAN CREATE THIS BY ORDINANCE AND MAKE THIS WITH THE
MAYOR'S CERTAINLY APPROVAL STANDING BOARD.
THAT'S SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL COULD CONSIDER.
RIGHT NOW, AS I RECALL -- AND I REMEMBER IN 2008, THIS WAS A
COMMITTEE CREATED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE
SUPPORT WAS ALL TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND THE
APPOINTEES WERE INDIVIDUALLY SELECTED BY CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS.
15:39:06 >>BILL CARLSON:
AND IF WE WANTED TO MODIFY THE ORDINANCE --
15:39:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IT'S NOT AN ORDINANCE, IT'S A RESOLUTION
OF CITY COUNCIL.
15:39:14 >> CAN WE INVITE THE MAYOR TO APPOINT TWO?
IF SHE DOESN'T WANT TO --
15:39:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IT'S COUNCIL'S COMMITTEE.
COUNCIL CAN MAKE THAT AMENDMENT.
15:39:27 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO MODIFY THE
RESOLUTION OF THE CREATION OF THAT COMMITTEE TO INVITE THE
MAYOR TO APPOINT TWO APPOINTEES TO THE COMMITTEE.
15:39:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE HAVE A SECOND?
YES, SIR?
I DON'T THINK ANY SPECIFIC DATE CHIEF OF STAFF IS HERE AND
TAKE IT TO THE MAYOR AND SEE IF WE CAN --
15:39:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OKAY.
THIS IS SOMETHING I HADN'T DISCUSSED WITH THE CHIEF OF STAFF
OR THE ADMINISTRATION OR THE COMMITTEE, THAT CERTAINLY
HASN'T GONE TO THE COMMITTEE YET.
15:39:56 >>BILL CARLSON:
IF THEY DECIDE NOT TO DO IT, THAT'S FINE.
15:39:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHY NOT DECIDE AT THE NEXT COMMITTEE
MEETING AND LET US KNOW?
MEET WITH THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS AND SEE IF THEY WOULD BE
AGREEABLE FOR THE MAYOR TO HAVE TWO APPOINTEES, LET US KNOW
AND WE'LL MAKE THE OFFICIAL MOTION.
15:40:13 >> YESTERDAY ONE OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS MADE A MOTION TO
THE FACT --
DID IT PASS?
15:40:27 >> I BELIEVE -- YOU KNOW WHAT?
IT'S PUT ON THE TABLE, BUT THERE WAS NOT A MOTION INTO IT.
SO WE WILL REVISIT IT ON MAY 4th.
15:40:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
LET'S DO THAT, REVISIT IT MAY 4th
AND COUNCILMEMBER MECHANICS GUDES --
15:40:49 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I CHANGE MY MOTION TO ADD A DISCUSSION
ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF TWO MAYORAL APPOINTEES TO THE
COMMITTEE?
15:40:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THIS IS DIRECTING YOU TO TELL YOUR
COMMITTEE, NOT A FORMAL MOTION BUT YOU COME BACK TO US AND
LET US KNOW AND WE CAN TAKE ACTION FROM THERE.
15:41:03 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN WE JUST ADD A SEPARATE AGENDA ITEM?
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADD TO THE AGENDA ON MAY
4 --
15:41:11 >>> I HAVE AN AGENDA MAY 4th.
WE ARE HERE MAY 5th.
IT'S SEPARATE.
15:41:17 >>BILL CARLSON:
WHEN ARE THEY COMING BACK BEFORE US?
15:41:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THEY ARE NOT.
15:41:21 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I MAKE A MOTION WHILE HE'S HERE JUST TO
ADD TO MAY 10th, A DISCUSSION WITH STAFF ABOUT THE
POSSIBILITY OF ADDING TWO MAYORAL APPOINTEES TO THE BUDGET
COMMITTEE?
15:41:36 >> ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS I WILL SAY SINCE WE ARE ON THIS
TOPIC, WE ONLY GET TO BRIEF COUNCIL ONCE A YEAR.
AND I THINK THAT'S A DISSERVICE TO COUNCIL, BECAUSE YOU ARE
NOT WELL INFORMED AS TO THE PROGRESS OF THE COMMITTEE, AND
THE ADMINISTRATION WHEN WE MEET WITH THE DEPARTMENTS.
SO IT WOULD BE UP TO YOU -- I AM A QUARTERLY GUY.
OKAY, WE MEET MONTHLY AND WE DON'T HAVE TO AGREE TO MONTHLY,
BUT AT LEAST QUARTERLY, WE CAN KEEP COUNCIL INFORMED AS TO
THE PROGRESS THAT THE CITIZENS BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
IS MAKING WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, AND JUST KIND OF KEEP
COUNCIL INFORMED AS TO WHERE WE ARE AT.
SO I THINK --
15:42:25 >>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
15:42:27 >>BILL CARLSON:
DOES MY MOTION HAVE A SECOND OR NOT?
15:42:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU WANTED MAY 10th WITH THE
COMMENDATIONS?
15:42:33 >>BILL CARLSON:
I'M SORRY.
MAY 19th.
RETURN ON MAY 19th.
ASK STAFF TO RETURN ON MAY 19th TO DISCUSS THE
POSSIBILITY OF ADDING TWO MAYORAL APPOINTEES TO THE BUDGET
AND FINANCE COMMITTEE.
15:42:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MEANWHILE YOU ARE MEET WITH YOUR
COMMITTEE ON MAY 4th AND WE'LL HAVE INFORMATION AND
FEEDBACK FROM EVERYONE THERE.
WE HAVE A MOTION -- WAIT.
DO YOU HAVE A SECOND TO THAT?
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
15:42:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT BUT I DO
THINK IF THE COMMITTEE IS GOING TO MEET, WHATEVER
RECOMMENDATION THEY NEED TO FUNCTION AS A COMMITTEE, BECAUSE
THE RESOLUTION IS OUTDATED LOT, THEY CAN AT LEAST BE UPDATED
IN ORDER TO COME BACK WITH --
15:43:13 >>BILL CARLSON:
OKAY, AND ALONG -- ALONG WITH ANY OTHER
RECOMMENDED CHANGES.
15:43:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN
CARLSON, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
15:43:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU GOT THAT?
OKAY.
15:43:30 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I MENTION SOMETHING ABOUT THE BUDGET
PROCESS?
15:43:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE DIDN'T EVEN TALK ABOUT THE
COLLABORATIVE PROCESS.
WE WENT INTO THE WEEDS.
15:43:38 >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK HE WAS JUST ASKING US.
MY QUESTION, CHIEF BENNETT, COULD YOU JUST TELL US, HOW MANY
TIMES DIABETES WE MEET LAST YEAR?
YOU ALL PRESENTED TO US BUT HOW MANY MEETINGS CAN DID WE
HAVE?
WHAT WAS THE PROCESS? I THOUGHT THE PROCESS YOU DID LAST
YEAR WAS GOOD.
SINCE WE CAN'T TALK TO EACH OTHER IN BETWEEN MEETINGS, I WAS
WONDERING IF ANYBODY WANTED TO MODIFY THAT PROCESS.
COULD YOU JUST TELL US QUICKLY WHAT YOU DID LAST YEAR AND
WHAT YOU RECOMMEND THIS YEAR?
15:44:03 >>JOHN BENNETT:
CHIEF OF STAFF.
EVERY YEAR SO FAR, WE HAVE TRIED TO INCREASE THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR SOME SORT OF ENGAGEMENT LOOKING AT WHAT I CALL THE TWO
CORNER STONES OF THE BUDGET, WHICH IS THE LEVEL OF SERVICE,
AN ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT.
LIKE HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THAT WE GET A SUSTAINABLE LEVEL OF
SERVICE IN EVERY CORNER OF THE CITY AND EVERY FUNCTION THAT
CITY GOVERNMENT PROVIDES TO THEIR COMMUNITY?
AND SO THE SPIRIT OF WORKING WITH CHIEF ROGERO WAS TO LOOK
AT THE INTERNAL CLOCK OF THE BUDGET PREPARATION CYCLE AND
THEN FIGURE OUT WHERE THE OPPORTUNITIES EXIST FOR THE
CITIZENS GROUP, AS WELL AS COUNCIL, TO GIVE INPUT.
AND SOME OF THOSE INPUT WERE REALLY GOOD DRIVERS BECAUSE I
KNOW WHEN I FIRST CAME BACK TO THE CITY, WE INCREASED AN
OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THE SOCIAL ACTION AND ARTS FUND
COMMUNITY AND GET A LOT OF INPUT FROM COUNCIL TO WORK ON
THOSE NONPROFIT GROUPS, TO SEE HOW WE CAN SUPPORT THEM,
BECAUSE THEY ARE FILLING A LOT OF GAPS, AND COUNCIL'S INPUT
WAS INVALUABLE ON THAT.
SO TO ANSWER THE CLOCK QUESTION, ACTUALLY CHIEF ROGERO PUT
TOGETHER KIND OF A TIMELINE ENGAGEMENT, AND I DEFER TO HIM
TO KIND OF LOOK AT THE SEQUENCING.
AND I THINK WE CAN AGAIN, AS I HEARD TODAY, IN THE TESTIMONY
OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WE DO
NEED MORE LEAD TIME TO HAVE A BETTER MORE FLUID
PRESENTATION.
CHIEF ROGERO ALWAYS TALKS ABOUT THE BUDGET MIDPOINT REVIEW
WHICH SHOULD BE COMING UP.
THAT'S A GREAT CHANCE TO CYCLE IN THE BUDGET FINANCE
COMMITTEE TO SEE HOW WELL WE ARE IN SYNC FOR THE FIRST SIX
MONTHS OF THE FIRST QUARTER OF FY 22 AND THEN ALSO START THE
PLANNING FOR FY 23.
CHIEF, DO YOU WANT TO AUGMENT THAT THE?
REASONING ROGERO AS I SAID, IT REALLY IS A VERY GOOD TIME
BECAUSE WE WILL COMING TO YOU WITH THE MIDYEAR REVIEW NEXT
MONTH COINCIDING WITH THE NEXT MEETING OF THE CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE, SOMEWHAT, AND THEN FROM THERE, IF YOU
WILL LAST YEAR, AGAIN WE HIT THE GROUND RUNNING WITH
ONE-ON-ONE MEETINGS.
AGAIN WE WANTED TO GET, AS CHIEF OF STAFF SAID, YOUR INPUT
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS WE CRAFTED NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET.
THROUGHOUT THAT PROCESS, THE BUDGET WORKSHOP, AS I
MENTIONED, BUT WE ALSO TOOK QUESTIONS AND PROVIDED ANSWERS.
AGAIN, I THINK I MENTIONED SOME OF YOU WANTED MORE THAN JUST
ONE MEETING, SO WE PROVIDED THAT, AS OFTEN AND AS FREQUENTLY
AS YOU WOULD LIKE.
PHILOSOPHICALLY, I WOULD PREFER MORE MEETINGS SO WE KEEP
ABREAST OF WHAT YOUR PRIORITIES ARE AND WHAT THOSE
PRIORITIES REMAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.
NOT INTENDED TO AMBUSH ANYBODY AND CERTAINLY NOT YOUR
INTENT, I'M SURE, TO GIVE US INFORMATION TOO LATE INFORM US
TO EASILY ACT ON.
BUT AGAIN WE CAN BE VERY FLEXIBLE, MORE MEETINGS, WOULD YOU
LIKE EARLIER, OR MORE FREQUENT WORKSHOPS?
AND THAT'S WHY AGAIN I AM THANKFUL THIS MOTION OCCURRED
RIGHT NOW.
IT'S THE PEST TIME TO START DISCUSSING THAT.
15:47:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH SO MUCH.
NEXT UP IS ITEM NUMBER 72.
OCEA WYNN TO DISCUSS VILA BROTHERS PARK.
15:47:26 >>OCEA WYNN:
GOOD AFTERNOON.
WELCOME.
MA'AM, WELCOME.
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU.
I SUBMITTED A REPORT REGARDING -- OCEA WYNN, ADMINISTRATIVE
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.
I SUBMITTED A MEMO REGARDING VILA BROTHERS, AND I JUST
WANTED TO UPDATE COUNCIL ON WHAT HAS OCCURRED SINCE THE MEMO
WAS SUBMITTED LAST WEEK.
IT'S IN THE MEMO THAT WE WERE ON THE 29th WE WERE
MEETING WITH -- WE HAD SELECTED A CONSULTANT, ENGINEERING
CONSULTANT, FOR THE VILA BROTHERS PARK.
THAT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IN THE PARK WE HAVE DRAINAGE
ISSUES.
SO BEFORE WE START WITH THE REPAIRS, WITH THE PARK
IMPROVEMENTS, IT'S POWER THAT WE GET THE INFRASTRUCTURE
RIGHT.
SINCE THAT TIME, ON APRIL 1st, WE MET WITH THE MAYOR AND
THEN ON APRIL 4th DID A SITE ASSESSMENT SO EVERYONE WAS
ALIGNED WITH WHAT EXACTLY WAS GOING ON WITH THE
INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS.
WHAT WE WILL BE DOING, ONCE WE DO THE PARKS IMPROVEMENTS, WE
WILL PUT IN PICNIC SHELTERS, WE WILL HAVE LARGE AND SMALL
DOG PARKS, WE WILL HAVE AN EXERCISE TRAIL WITH THE EXERCISE
EQUIPMENT, WE WILL HAVE A PLAYGROUND AREA AND COURT
LIGHTING.
IN ADDITION TO BE THAT WE WILL DO THE COURT RESURFACING.
WE WILL HAVE AN ADA SIDEWALK ADDITIONS.
WHEN WE HAD THE ASSESSMENT LAST WEEK WE DID HAVE AN ADA SITE
ASSESSMENT AS WELL.
WE WILL BE REPLACING THE SAME FOOTPRINT OF THE EXISTING
BASKETBALL COURTS.
THOSE BASKETBALL COURTS, WE ARE GOING TO START WITH THE
NORTH END OF THE COURTS.
AFTER THE INFRASTRUCTURE PIECE IS DONE IN THAT AREA.
THEN CONTINUE TO WORK THROUGHOUT THE PARK.
WE WILL BE INSTALLING PICKLEBALL COURT AREAS, AND THEN WE
WILL BE REPLACING THE WEST END OF THE PARK WITH AN
ORNAMENTAL FENCE.
I WANTED COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT THIS HAS BEEN IN DISCUSSION
FOR A WHILE.
WHERE IT'S STARTING, THE ACTUAL MOTION ON GETTING THE PARK
REPAIRS DONE.
15:49:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY.
AND IS THERE AN END DATE, A GOAL DATE FOR ALL THESE THINGS?
MY ISSUE IS, A COUPLE OF THINGS.
MS. MARTHA VILA'S HEALTH, I WANT HER TO SEE THIS WHILE SHE
IS WITH US.
I WAS HERE FOR JULIAN LANG AND THAT WAS A MOTHER'S DAY
WEEKEND DEADLINE AND IT GOT DONE.
THE HANNA PROJECT, THE WHOLE CITY CENTER, I THINK IS A YEAR
OUT, AND IT'S GOING TO GET DONE.
I'M SURE IT'S GOING TO BE GREAT AND WHATNOT.
BUT WITH THIS PARK, I MEAN, TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
CONSIDERING EVERYONE HAS BEEN VERY PATIENT.
I DID MY DUE DILIGENCE IN VOTING HOW I VOTE AND SUPPORT WHAT
I HAVE TO SUPPORT IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THE FINANCING WAS
DONE WITH THIS.
BUT WHAT DO I TELL MRS. VILA?
15:50:52 >>OCEA WYNN:
SO COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, AFTER WE HAVE THE
FINAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FROM THE ENGINEER, WE DID THE
SITE WALK THROUGH LAST WEEK, I DON'T HAVE A DEFINITIVE
ANSWER IN TERMS OF WHEN WE CAN ACTUALLY GET STARTED.
15:51:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHEN DO YOU EXPECT THAT ASSESSMENT TO
BE FINISHED?
15:51:14 >>OCEA WYNN:
IF I CAN GET BACK WITH YOU AFTERWARDS AND LET
NOW AN UPDATE WHEN THAT WOULD BE FINISHED.
15:51:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IF YOU COULD CONTACT MY OFFICE
DIRECTLY.
NO NEED TO COME HERE BUT I WILL COMMUNICATE WITH THE
NEIGHBORHOOD, I WILL COMMUNICATE WITH MRS. VILA AND GO FROM
THERE.
BUT TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE.
YOU KNOW, IT'S LIFE AND DEATH AT THIS POINT.
I AM NOT TRYING TO BE DRAMATIC.
BUT IT WOULD BE AN HONOR, WOULD BE WONDERFUL FOR HER TO SEE
THE PARK AT LEAST TO CLOSE TO COMPLETION, WHATEVER, WHILE
SHE'S STILL WITH US.
I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU.
15:51:45 >>OCEA WYNN:
YES, SIR.
AND THE NEXT ITEM IS MINE AS WELL.
15:51:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WELL, COUNCILMAN VIERA, WE HAVE 73 IS
THE FIRE STATION.
WE HAVE A MEMO FROM THAT.
OKAY, YOU ARE HERE AS WELL.
YES, MA'AM.
15:52:07 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I JUST SAY THIS?
I KNOW YOU KNOW THIS, AND THANK YOU FOR TAKING ON THE VILA
BROTHERS PARK.
I THINK YOU KNOW THIS BUT ALL OF US ARE INTERESTED IN THIS
PARK.
IT'S NOT JUST A DISTRICT THING.
IT'S AN IMPORTANT THING FOR A LOT, ESPECIALLY FOR THE VILA
FAMILY BUT FOR THE WHOLE COMMUNITY IN HONORING OUR VETERANS.
SO THANK YOU.
15:52:29 >>OCEA WYNN:
YES, SIR.
15:52:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ITEM NUMBER 76.
15:52:32 >>OCEA WYNN:
THAT'S A MEMO, THE REQUEST WAS TO FORM A YOUTH
ADVISORY COUNCIL, AND I AM HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
REGARDING THE MEMO.
15:52:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, MA'AM.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
15:52:47 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I WOULD LIKE TO AT LEAST GET THAT MEMO.
TELL ME ABOUT IT.
WYNN WITHIN YES, SIR, I WILL BE GLAD TO.
GLAD TO. IN RESPONSE TO THE -- OUR INTENT OR THE ASK TO
FORM A YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, WHAT WE REPORTED, COUNCILMAN
GUDES, IS THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT UNDER MY
LEADERSHIP, WE FORM A PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COUNCIL.
WHAT THAT MEANS IS BE WE DID NOT SOLELY FOCUS ON INTERNAL
PARTNERS OR STAFF.
OUR PARKS DEPARTMENT WITH THE YMCA, BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, THE
SKILLS CENTER, AS WELL AS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT, TEMPLE TERRACE, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY,
AND PLANT CITY.
SO THE PURPOSE OF THAT IS FOR ALL OF US TO WORK
COLLABORATIVELY TO NOT ONLY ADVICE THE YOUTH SPORTS, BUT
SOME OF THE OTHER ISSUES, THE EDUCATION, AND HOW WE ON BOARD
THE COACHES AND VOLUNTEERS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE SOME
CONSISTENCY WITHIN THOSE PROCESSES, WE CAN LEARN FROM EACH
OTHER, AND WE CAN HAVE MORE OF AN ALIGNMENT.
PART OF THE INTENT IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE AREAS WITHIN
OUR RESPECTIVE AREAS WHERE WE HAVE -- WHERE PEOPLE DO NOT
HAVE ACCESSIBILITY OR AFFORDABLE TO PARKS AND RECREATION
ACTIVITIES, THAT WE CAN IN FACT PROVIDE THAT TO THEM
THROUGH -- OR ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES THROUGH THE ADVICE OF
COUNCIL.
15:54:28 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THE CHALLENGE THAT WE HAVE ON ACTIVITIES,
I UNDERSTAND YOU ARE TRYING TO GET A BIG SPECTRUM BUT THAT
WASN'T THE SPECTRUM I WAS LOOKING FOR AND THE DIRECTION I
WAS LOOKING FOR.
WE HAVE A LOT OF YOUTH SPORTS ISSUES.
AND THE BOYS ADD GIRLS CLUB, YMCA, THEY DON'T HAVE A LOT OF
THE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE AT SOME OF OUR RECREATION
FACILITIES, WHERE SOME OF OUR OUTSIDE NONPROFIT
ORGANIZATIONS AS RELATES TO YOUTH SPORTS.
THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES WITH YOUTH SPORTS, BACKGROUND
ISSUES WE GET CALLS, I CALL ALL THE TIME ABOUT ISSUES,
FIELDS, A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS ARE GOING ON, A LOT OF
FIGHTS EVERYBODY HAPPENING.
NOT ENOUGH FIELDS.
PEOPLE ARE FIGHTING OVER FIELDS.;
SO DEALING WITH THE COUNTY, TEMPLE TERRACE, PLANT CITY, AND
ALL THOSE ENTITIES, I WAS LOOKING MORE OF A YOUTH SPORTS
COMMISSION TO WHERE YOU COULD ADDRESS LOCAL ISSUES.
THE BIGGER ISSUES, WE HAVE GOT SOME OTHER ISSUES AT THE
BOTTOM DOWN HERE THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS NOW BECAUSE WE HAVE
A LOT OF CHAOS WITHIN THE WHOLE COUNTY AS RELATES TO YOUTH
SPORTS.
SO THAT'S WHAT I WAS KIND OF LOOKING FOR WHEN I TALK ABOUT A
YOUTH SPORTS COMMISSION, NOT A BIG, BIG ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
15:55:52 >>OCEA WYNN:
YES, SIR.
SO PART OF THAT ADVISORY COUNCIL IS TO HAVE THOSE
SUBCOMMITTEES WHO WILL ACTUALLY ADDRESS EDUCATION, OR
ADDRESS YOUTH SPORTS, THOSE PARTICULAR AREAS OF INTEREST.
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS TO MAKE SURE I'M ADDRESSING --
THAT WE CAN HAVE A DISCUSSION OFFLINE, AND SO I CAN
INTEGRATE WHAT YOUR CONCERNS ARE INTO THE OVERALL --
OVERARCHING COMMUNITY, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE IN FACT
ADDRESSED.
15:56:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I THINK THE PARKS AND REC, FOR THEIR
ASSISTANCE, THE SPORTS, WE MET YEARS AND YEARS AND WE PRETTY
MUCH KNOW WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.
BUT PRETTY MUCH KNOW WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR AND NEED.
BUT WE CAN HAVE THAT DISCUSSION, BUT I THINK WE HAVE SOME
ISSUES THAT RELATES TO FOOTBALL, BASEBALL, SOME OF THE
ISSUES THAT WE ARE HAVING, AND STILL HEARING.
SO I JUST HOPE THAT THERE WILL BE A ROBUST DISCUSSION.
I KNOW THERE IS DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNTY AND THE CITY
TRYING TO DO SOME THINGS AS PERTAINS TO YOUTH FOOTBALL
BECAUSE OF THE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN COMING UP.
THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I AM FOCUSED ON.
A BIG BROADER PICTURE AS WELL, BUT THE BIG NEED IS DOWN AT
THE BOTTOM OF THE YOUTH SPORTS WYNN ONE YES, SIR.
15:57:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THE NEXT THREE ITEMS ARE ALL FROM COUNCIL VIERA.
15:57:30 >>LUIS VIERA:
73, I DID A MOTION TO HAVE THAT COME BACK TO
US IN TWO MONTHS.
74 I AM FINE WITH THAT IF ANYBODY WISHES TO SPEAK ON THAT.
I THINK THE NUMBER SPEAKS FOR ITSELF AT THIS TIME.
AND 75, CHIEF TRIPP, I WAS TOLD YOU WEREN'T GOING TO BE
HERE.
GO AHEAD, MA'AM.
15:57:57 >>CHIEF TRIPP:
WELCOME, LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU.
COUNCILMEMBER VIERA, I DID SPEAK ON THIS ON THE LAST SPECIAL
MEETING CONCERNING THAT ZIP CODE PART OF THE MASTER PLAN
THAT WE ARE GOING TO TRY TO DO FOR THE ENTIRE CITY AS
RESPONSE TIME.
SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANTED TO ADD THAT TO THAT OR JUST
CONTINUE.
THAT IS PART OF THAT MASTER PLAN THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO
IMPLEMENT SOME ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR THAT AREA TO
INCREASE THAT TIME.
15:58:27 >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, MA'AM, FOR YOUR WORK IN THAT
REGARD.
I'LL HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS IN THE 8 WEEKS WHEN IT
COMES BACK TO US.
THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE NEED LONG-TERM VISIONS FOR.
AGAIN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE WORKFORCE HOUSING IN WEST
TAMPA THAT'S COMING UP.
AND THEN THERE'S MORE ISSUES THAT REQUIRE MORE IMMEDIATE
TRIAGE, HELP AND RESPONSE, AND I THINK SOME OF THE LEADING
TIMES IN 33647 ARE FOR THAT AND I BELIEVE THERE ARE
SOMETIMES 11, 12, 13 MINUTES, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM
WRONG, IN THAT REGARD.
SO I KNOW THAT FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE WATCHING
THIS AND MAY HAVE AN INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE, THERE'S A
COUPLE OF THINGS THAT TAMPA FIRE RESCUE IS LOOKING FOR,
WHICH IS, NUMBER ONE, LOOKING TO HAVE A CUT-THROUGH ACCESS
FROM MORRIS BRIDGE ROAD INTO K-BAR RANCH TO ADDRESS THOSE
TIMES, AND ADDITIONALLY FIRE STATION I GUESS IT WOULD BE 24,
WE HAVE GOT 23 IN 2019, I BELIEVE IT WAS, 25 IS ABOUT TO
COME UP FOR NORTH TAMPA, AND 24 WILL RESPECTFULLY BE FOR
K-BAR RANCH, AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT SOMETHING POTENTIALLY
AS IN MEDICAL UNIT ONLY THERE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE
ISSUES.
SO I DO WANT THIS TO COME BACK TO US RELATIVELY SOON.
AGAIN, JUST GIVEN THE URGENT HUMAN ISSUE HERE, I GUESS IF
YOU WILL.
SO THAT'S IT.
WE CAN HAVE THAT COME BACK IN THE EIGHT WEEKS AND GO FROM
THERE.
BUT I AM FINE FOR NOW.
AND THANK YOU, MA'AM.
15:59:59 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHIEF.
YES, SIR?
16:00:05 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IS STAFF HERE --
16:00:08 >>> FOR 77, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING.
16:00:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHIEF TRIPP.
16:00:16 >>STEVEN BENSON:
WELCOME, COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
I THY BELIEVE WE HAVE A PRESENTATION TO PULL UP, AND THE
PURPOSE IS TO REPORT BACK ON COUNCIL'S REQUEST THAT STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION LOOK INTO WAYS TO PROMOTE MORE MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
AND I BELIEVE I WILL HAND IT OVER TO JAMES WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
16:00:44 >> JAY COLLINS WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
STAFF IS HERE TODAY TO ACTUALLY PROVIDE THAT FRONT THAT MR.
BEN SON SPOKE OF.
NEXT SLIDE, THANK YOU.
ABOUT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
WE HAVE ACTUALLY PROVIDED A MEMO THAT WILL SPEAK TO IN A
LITTLE BIT.
WE ALSO PROVIDED ALREADY THE STUDY TO THIS BODY WHICH IS ON
FILE WITH YOU GUYS.
AGAIN, THIS IS GOING BACK TO THAT DECEMBER 2nd MEETING.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS AT THAT DECEMBER 2nd MEETING
WAS THE CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE, WHICH DOES HAVE A MIXED USE
RESIDENTIAL CATEGORY, AND IT HAS A REQUIREMENT FOR A 10%
SET-ASIDE OF A SECOND USE.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
THAT ACTUAL CATEGORY HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE
CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE.
IT EXISTS WITHIN ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT IT DOES NOT
EXIST ON THE LAND USE MAP.
SO IT IS NOT ACTUALLY BEING UTILIZED BY THE CITY OF
FT. LAUDERDALE TO TAKE IT ONE STEP FURTHER, THERE IS NOT
ACTUALLY ANY ZONING BOARD.
SO WE CALLED OUT THE CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE, AND WE ASKED
THE QUESTION, SO WHAT'S UP?
SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THEM
ABOUT POLICY WAS THE CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE IMMEDIATELY
STARTED TALKING ABOUT THEIR ACTIVITY CENTERS, WHICH ACTUALLY
INCENTIVIZED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDED THE AREA FOR
THAT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT TO GROW.
THEY TALKED ABOUT THEIR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT.
THEY HAVE TROLLEY, HEAVY RAIL, THEY HAVE BRIGHT LINE,
STREETCAR THROUGH DOWNTOWN, THEY HAVE SOME BUS RAPID
TRANSIT.
SO THEY BASICALLY TOLD US THAT THEY HAVE AN INCENTIVE
PROGRAM AND THEY HAVE SOME SECONDARY PLAN AND THEY HAVE SOME
INFRASTRUCTURE MR. B WHERE THAT MIXED USE GOES.
THAT MIXED USE CATEGORY ACTUALLY WENT INTO THEIR PLAN IN
2005.
SO IT'S BEEN SITTING IN THERE FOR THAT LONG BUT IT IS NOT
ACTUALLY BEEN IMPLEMENTED.
OKAY.
LIKE ANY GOOD STUDENT WE SAID WHAT CAN WE TAKE FROM
FT. LAUDERDALE AND SEE HOW WE CAN ACTUALLY APPLY THAT IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVEN'T APPLIED IT, WHAT CAN
WE DO?
SO WE KNOW ONE OF THE THINGS THIS BODY IS INTERESTED IN IS
SOME SORT OF A THRESHOLD FOR MIXED USE.
SO WHEN YOU COME IN, YOU COME IN AND YOU SAY, I'M BRINGING
5% SECOND USE, 10% SECOND USE, WHY AM I BRINGING TO THE
CITY?
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
THIS IS SOME OF THE LANGUAGE THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE THAT'S
PROVIDED IN THAT MEMO TO YOU, PROVIDED TO YOU IN A
STRIKE-THROUGH UNDERLINE FROM TAMPA'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
WHAT WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THOUGH IS THE PROCESS OF HOW YOU
GO OUT HAVING THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS.
SO THE LANGUAGE IS OPTIONAL.
THE LANGUAGE IS NOT TO SAY WHETHER YOU ARE CONSISTENT OR
INCONSISTENT.
THIS IS A PROCEDURAL.
THE CONSISTENCY FINDINGS OF COMPATIBILITY ISSUES, THE USE
ISSUES AND OTHER THINGS.
THIS IS MORE OF A PROCEDURAL ISSUE.
THAT PROCEDURAL ISSUE WE TALK ABOUT IS WILL IN LAYMEN'S
TERMS TALK ABOUT THE SIZE OF A BUILDING.
THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING IS THE FLOOR AREA RATIO THAT YOU
HAVE THERE.
SO WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR SOME OF
THESE CATEGORIES THAT ARE IN EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOUR
DISTRICTS, COMMUNICATE COMMERCIAL 35, COMMUNITY MIXED USE
35, TODAY, ANYTIME YOU WANT TO GO FROM 1.5 TO A 2.0, THERE
ARE A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO GET THERE.
ONE OF THEM IS TO PROVIDE MIXED USE.
HOWEVER, THERE IS NO THRESHOLD FOR WHAT THAT MIXED USE IS.
SO THAT'S WHAT WE ARE PUTTING INTO THE PLAN HERE FOR YOU TO
GIVE US SOME FEEDBACK ON, IS THAT THRESHOLD.
SO THE IDEA OF IT WOULD BE IF I DON'T BEAT 5% OR THE 1500
SQUARE FEET, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU
ARE INCONSISTENT ON THE SURFACE OF THAT.
IT MEANS THAT YOU WOULD GO INTO WHAT THE CITY ALREADY DOES
TODAY, WHICH IS A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
SO THAT'S PART OF THE WAY IN WHICH THE CITY OPERATES ITSELF
AS IT MOVES FORWARD INTO THESE TWO LAND USES.
BASICALLY YOU ARE TIERING YOURSELF.
EVERY TIME YOU GO TO ANOTHER TIER THE CITY HAS ANOTHER TYPE
OF AGREEMENT IT WANTS YOU TO DO, OR OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OR OF YOUR CODE THAT YOU MUST MEET.
SO THE LANGUAGE THAT IS OUT THERE TODAY FOR YOU IS ACTUALLY
ESTABLISHING A THRESHOLD.
IF YOU MEET THAT THRESHOLD WOULD YOU NOT HAVE TO GO INTO A
BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
AND WE HAVE TAKEN THIS ONE STEP FURTHER TO ACTUALLY EXPAND
THIS IDEA, NOT ONLY THE ARTERIALS WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA
BUT ALSO THE COLLECTORS WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA WHICH AGAIN
GIVES BETTER GUIDANCE ON FUTURE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
OUR CITY AND OUR NEIGHBORHOODS.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
SO WHAT'S NEXT?
WE ARE HERE.
WE WOULD LIKE A LITTLE BIT OF FEEDBACK.
OBVIOUSLY WE PROVIDED YOU SO STRIKE THROUGH UNDERLINE
LANGUAGE.
YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND PROVIDE US, WE LIKE THAT LANGUAGE,
LET'S MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT LANGUAGE, WHEN CAN YOU ACTUALLY
HAVE THAT WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN?
THAT WOULD BE SIX TO NINE MONTHS TO ACTUALLY DO A TEXT
ENDMENT.
IF YOU GO AND SAY THIS IS GOOD BUT I NOT GOING FAR ENOUGH,
WE HAVE SOME IDEAS IN WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THAT?
WE WOULD MOST LIKELY ROLL THAT INTO THE FUTURE LAND USE'S
UPDATE WHICH IS ONGOING RIGHT NOW, AND WOULD PROBABLY BE
COMING TO THIS BODY SOMETIME IN 2023.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
BASICALLY, WITH THAT, THAT IS THE END OF THIS PRESENTATION.
AND AGAIN MYSELF AND MR. BEN SON OR MRS. GARANTIVA ARE
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
16:06:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPORT.
I KNEW YOU AND MR. BENSON COULD COME TO US WITH SOME
DIRECTIVE.
THIS WHOLE SUBJECT OF ME STARTING WITH A FORMER COUNCILMAN
AND MYSELF SAYING, OKAY, WE HAVE A DEVELOPER COMING IN, SAID
THEY WANT THE TERM MIXED USE ON THEIR BUILDINGS, AND THEY
HAVE A 30,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING, BUT THEY ARE ONLY HAVING
500 SQUARE FOOT OF RETAIL.
TO ME THAT WASN'T MIXED USE.
THEN MY THOUGHT AS ALWAYS, HOW DO WE MAKE OUR COMMUNITY MORE
WALKABLE, MORE BIKEABLE, WHEN YOU BUILD A BUILDING, AND
AFTER YOU GET HOME YOU HAVE TO GET BACK IN YOUR CAR TO GO
OUT AND DO SOMETHING ELSE.
GROUND FLOOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT, SMALL SHOP, THAT IS THE
IDEA TO KEEP THE PEOPLE WALKING AND BIKING, IF NOT ON A
SCOOTER.
CASE IN POINT.
SPT JUST OPENED UP.
THEIR GROUND FLOOR RETAIL IS 100% LEASED.
IT'S NOT ALL BUILT OUT YET, BUT WHERE THE DENSITY IS, WHERE
THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GO, THE GROUND FLOOR MIXED USE IS
GOING TO BE A NECESSITY.
NOW GOING BACK TO MY PRAYER STATEMENT.
DEFINING MIXED USE.
AND THANK YOU FOR PUTTING A LEVEL IN THERE.
IN MY OPINION, IF SOMEONE IS GOING TO COME BEFORE US AS A
MIXED USE, THERE SHOULD BE THAT THRESHOLD THAT THEY SHOULD
HAVE TO MEET AND ADD THE BURDEN OF PROOF TO PRESENT TO US ON
THE REASONS WHY THAT THRESHOLD CAN'T BE MET.
I'M AT A DEAD-END ROAD, THE DENSITY IS NOT QUITE THERE FOR
IT YET.
SO THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING A LOT OF MY QUESTIONS, A LOT OF
MY CONCERNS, AND I THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS THRESHOLD
CONCEPT, BUT I STILL FEEL THAT BURDEN OF PROOF SHOULD BE MET
BY THE DEVELOPERS.
16:08:30 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
THAT WAS A GREAT PRESENTATION.
I AM GOING TO PICKY BACK A LITTLE BIT ON WHAT COUNCILMAN
CITRO SAID.
I THINK THRESHOLD IS GREAT.
MY QUESTION IS NINE TO FIVE AND NOT TEN.
16:08:42 >> THAT'S A VERY GOOD QUESTION.
SO CURRENTLY ON OUR WORK WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA, CURRENTLY A
LOT OF WHAT YOU ARE GETTING IS COMING IN AROUND TWO AND A
HALF TO THREE PERCEPT ON THE MIXED USE.
WE WENT TO FIVE%.
IT'S AN ASK ABOVE WHAT THE MARKET IS BRINGING.
BUT AGAIN THE 5% THRESHOLD IS TO GET YOU OUT OF ACTUALLY
GOING INTO THAT BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT.
AND MA'AM, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO KNOW ALSO, THE 1500 SQUARE
FEET, THAT'S COMING FROM COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
PROFESSIONALS WHO ARE TELLING US WHAT'S THE BASIC ENTRY
LEVEL THAT'S USABLE SPACE FOR THE MARKET?
16:09:18 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I THINK MY CONCERN IS THAT THAT'S GREAT THAT
WE ARE JUST TRYING TO DO STEPS, BUT THIS CITY IS MOVING SO
MUCH FASTER THAT I'M AFRAID THAT IF WE START -- IF 5% IS THE
PORTION WITHIN FIVE YEARS, WE ARE GOING TO 15.
16:09:40 >> BY ALL MEANS, IF THE MARKET BEARS THAT, THE MARKET CAN
BEAR THAT, BECAUSE AGAIN AS WHAT COUNCILMAN CITRO ALLUDED TO
THE ENTIRE BOTTOM FLOOR IS FULL IN THAT AREA, SO IF THE
MARKET BEARS THAT IT SHOULD ACTUALLY HAVE 5%, 8%, 15%, 20%,
BUT WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS A MINIMUM OF 5 GETS YOU OUT OF THE
BON US PROVISION AGREEMENT, AND THAT IS IRRESPECTIVE TO
WHERE YOU ARE IN THE CITY AS WELL.
BECAUSE WE DID NOT LOOK AT THIS AS A REAL ESTATE
PROFESSIONAL WHO MIGHT SAY ONE DEVELOPMENT IS HOTTER THAN
ANOTHER.
AGAIN A LAND USE PLANNER, NOT REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS.
16:10:20 >>LYNN HURTAK:
WOULD YOU CONSIDER POSSIBLY HAVING HIGHER
PERCENTAGE FOR THOSE MAIN ROADS VERSUS A SMALLER FOR
ARTERIALS? IS THAT A POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION?
16:10:35 >> YES, MA'AM.
THIS IS PART OF THIS CONVERSATION IS TO GET THAT TYPE OF
FEEDBACK FROM THIS GROUP.
YES.
16:10:40 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT.
THANK YOU.
16:10:46 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU FOR THAT.
AGAIN, GOING BACK TO THE BURDEN OF PROOF, IF WE SET IT
HIGHER, PETITIONERS CAN ALWAYS COME IN AND SAY, WE CAN'T
MEET THAT STANDARD NOW.
AND I SEE MR. BENSON SHAKING HIS HEAD NO.
BUT THAT IS STILL MY OPINION.
IF THE DEVELOPER MEETS THE BURDEN OF PROOF, WHETHER OR NOT
THE DENSITY IS NOT THERE NOW, THAT'S FINE.
BUT I THINK WE SHOULD SET OUR STANDARD A LITTLE HIGHER IN
ANTICIPATION TO THE RAPID GROWTH IN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
16:11:16 >> I APOLOGIZE.
A CLARIFICATION THAT THIS WOULD JUST BE FOR PROJECTS THAT
SEEK TO MOCKIZE THEIR DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL SO YOU WILL
STILL GET PROJECTS THAT COME UNDER ONE.
THAT'S HOW THEIR LAND USES ARE EXTRAORDINARY.
THEY ARE INCENTIVES, NOT REQUIREMENTS ACROSS THE BOARD.
THAT'S WHY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS GOING FIND IN THEIR
RESEARCH.
WE ARE JUST NOT -- I THINK THAT IN PRINCIPAL WE AGREED THAT
THE MORE FIXING OF USES, ASSUMING YOU CAN ACTUALLY FILL
THOSE SPACES THE BETTER, BUT THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS OF
EACH PROJECT.
AND DEPENDING ON WHERE THE PROJECT IS LOCATED, IF IT'S ON AN
ARTERIAL ROADWAY, IF IT'S REALLY ISOLATED AND DOESN'T TOUCH
THE ARTERIAL EXCEPT FOR A SMALL PIECE, DOES THAT PROJECT
HAVE TO PROVIDE THE SAME LEVEL OF A PROJECT THAT'S MAYBE AT
A CROSSROADS?
SO I AM NOT SURE WE ARE ABLE TO SOLVE THAT WITH THIS F.A.R.
AND OTHER MEASURES LIKE LOOKING AT PARKING, LOOKING AT SOME
OF THE PROVISIONS IN THE CODE THAT SPEAK TO THE REQUIREMENTS
AND DESIGN STANDARDS.
THERE ARE LOTS OF WAYS, AND IT SEEMS LIKE THIS IS A
REASONABLE START BUT ALSO HAPPY TO LOOK AT HIGHER AMOUNTS
AND COME BACK.
16:12:32 >>BILL CARLSON:
TO COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK, I KNOW YOU ARE IN
NEIGHBORHOOD AND PLANNING AND EVERYTHING.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ARE OUTSTANDING AND YOU
PROBABLY KNOW A BUNCH OF THEM, BUT THEY WILL STILL MEET WITH
YOU WHENEVER YOU WANT.
MOSTLY WE HEAR FROM THEM ABOUT LAND USE ISSUES AND THEY ARE
SO MUCH MORE CAPABLE THAN THAT, AND THEY HAVE REALLY GOOD
IDEAS, AND I WOULD RECOMMEND GOING AND LISTENING TO THEM.
AND STEVEN BENSON JUST JOINED IN THIS POSITION AND HE'S
OUTSTANDING, TOO.
THE CFO, AND CHIEF OF STAFF, I WOULD PUT MONEY INTO TWO OR
THREE MORE PEOPLE LIKE STEVEN BEN SON.
IN YOU DO THAT WE'LL TRANSFORM THIS CITY, TAKE HIS VISION
AND PUT OTHER PEOPLE LIKE THAT IN THERE, WE WILL REALLY HELP
THIS CITY.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, AT THE END OF YOUR DOCUMENT, YOU KIND
OF -- MAKE A MOTION FOR A NEXT STEP?
WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO DO?
16:13:28 >> SO WE JUST WANTED TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH
STRIKE-THROUGH UNDERLINE LANGUAGE.
WE THOUGHT THAT WAS PART OF WHAT YOU WANTED.
THE WORD WAS, WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP?
SO WE PROVIDED YOU WITH SOME LANGUAGE TO PONDER ON, TO CHEW
ON, AND I HAVE ALREADY HEARD A COUPLE OF FOLKS ASK FOR A
LITTLE BIT ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION TO THAT LANGUAGE.
SO WITH THAT IN MIND, STAFF CAN GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE THIS
CONVERSATION.
THAT WOULD BE ROLLED INTO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, SO
AGAIN THAT WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD COME BACK TO
THIS BODY IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS AS A PLAN AMENDMENT.
THIS WHICH IS IN FRONT OF YOU RIGHT NOW CAN COME BACK IN A
COUPLE MONTHS AS A PLAN AMENDMENT BUT IF I ROLL IT INTO THE
FUTURE LAND USE UPDATE THAT IS A MUCH LARGER PROCESS, AND
THIS IS JUST ONE PART OF A MUCH LARGER PROCESS.
16:14:21 >>BILL CARLSON:
COUNCILMEMBER CITRO, DO YOU WANT TO MAKE
THE MOTION TO SCHEDULE THE MEETING?
16:14:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA IS OUT OF THE ROOM.
IF THIS IS GOING TO BE A DISCUSSION, SURE.
16:14:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA?
16:14:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
[OFF MICROPHONE]
16:14:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IS THERE A MOTION?
16:14:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
[OFF MICROPHONE]
16:14:53 >>BILL CARLSON:
JUST COME BACK TO US?
16:14:55 >> IF YOU DON'T MAKE A MOTION THEN WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK
ON THIS AND ROLL THIS INTO THE UPDATE FOR THE FUTURE --
16:15:03 >>> ALL RIGHT.
SO WE'LL JUST LEAVE IT AS IS AND YOU WILL BE DOING THAT WORK
ANYWAY.
16:15:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I THINK MAYBE WE SHOULD HAVE A MOTION THAT
SOMETHING BE BROUGHT BACK AT A TIME CERTAIN.
16:15:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HOW FAR DOWN THE ROAD?
16:15:20 >> WE WOULD BE ASKING FOR A MOTION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THIS
SHOULD BE A STAND-ALONE AMENDMENT OR SHOULD GO WITH THE PLAN
UPDATE, WHICH WE PRESENTED TO YOU RECENTLY.
SO WE CAN TAKE WHAT WE HAVE NOW, TRY TO MASSAGE IT BASED ON
THE GUIDANCE PROVIDED AND WE CAN PUT IT ON THAT DOCKET FOR
THE PLAN UPDATE.
16:15:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, MA'AM?
16:15:43 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
YOU DID HAVE A GROWTH MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP COMING UP ON JUNE
23rd.
SO WE CAN BRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO YOU AT THAT TIME.
16:15:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COME BACK JUNE 23rd?
16:15:58 >> THAT WOULD BE MY MOTION.
PLEASE AND THANKS.
16:16:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. SHELBY?
16:16:02 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
CAN WE RESTATE THE MOTION?
BECAUSE IT PRESENTLY STATES FOR ITEM NUMBER 77, BASED ON
INCENTIVES BASED ON THE FT. LAUDERDALE MODEL AND I DON'T
THINK THAT TO THE PUBLIC IS VERY SPECIFIC.
SO IF WE CAN JUST REFRAME THE MOTION --
16:16:19 >> BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN TO US TODAY IN THIS
MEETING, WE WOULD LIKE FOR THIS TO COME BACK ON JUNE
23rd.
16:16:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND THIS IS CALLED WHAT SPECIFICALLY?
16:16:31 >>BILL CARLSON:
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM THRESHOLD.
16:16:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
16:16:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT.
WE HAVE TWO MORE ITEMS TO DISCUSS, AND THAT IS REGARDING THE
CHARTER REVIEW WORKSHOP AND THE ADDITIONAL COUNCIL MEETINGS.
HOWEVER, WE HAVE NOT VOTED ON 67 THROUGH 71.
STAFF WAS NOT ASKED TO BE PRESENT ON THIS.
THESE ARE MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR ITEMS.
FOR ITEM 67 MAY I HAVE SOMEONE MOVE THE RESOLUTION?
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ITEM NUMBER 68.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ITEM NUMBER 69.
MOVED BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ITEM NUMBER 70 IS PART 1 OF 2.
MOVED BY CITRO, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
OPPOSED?
AND ITEM 271.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT.
I SEE MS. FEELEY IN THE ROOM.
AND WE ARE GOING TO DISCUSS -- ADDITIONAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS TO ADDRESS THE SUBSTANTIAL BACKLOG IN LAND USE
HEARINGS.
YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
16:17:57 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
GOOD AFTERNOON AND WELCOME, COUNCILMAN
WOMAN HURTAK.
VERY NICE TO HAVE YOU.
WE ARE HERE TODAY, I WAS HERE LAST WEEK TO DISCUSS WITH YOU
ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR MEETINGS.
I DID FILE A MEMO AND PROVIDED SOME OPPORTUNITIES.
WE HAD A BRIEF DISCUSSION LAST WEEK, AND HAPPY TO MAKE THE
MOTION TO COME BACK TODAY TO DISCUSS THE ACTUAL DATES THAT
WE WOULD BE CONSIDERING ADDING THOSE CASES.
16:18:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL, IF
ANYONE HAS LOOKED AT THE DATES?
I'M HAPPY WITH ANYTHING, I'M OPEN, IF THERE'S ANYTHING
SPECIFIC.
16:18:39 >>BILL CARLSON:
I LIKE THE THURSDAY DATES.
16:18:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE HAVE DONE THEM --
16:18:48 >>LUIS VIERA:
I NEED TO SEE THEM AGAIN.
I'M SO SORRY.
16:18:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE ALTERNATE EVERY OTHER THURSDAY.
WE HAVE A NIGHT MEETING IN THAT GAP.
WE'LL HAVE THREE THURSDAY EVENING MEETINGS IN A ROW.
THAT'S RIGHT.
AND THE FOURTH THURSDAY IS FREE, EVENING.
16:19:04 >> IT WAS UP TO YOU WHICH ADDITIONAL NIGHT YOU WOULD LIKE TO
ADD.
RIGHT NOW YOU DO NOT MEET IN THE EVENING ON THE FIRST
THURSDAY AND THE THIRD THURSDAY.
16:19:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I'M HAPPY WITH THE FIRST THURSDAY
BECAUSE SOME OF THOSE ARE TYPICALLY ALCOHOL MEETINGS.
THE LAND USE ARE MORE EXPANSIVE.
BUT I THINK THE FIRST THURSDAY OF THE MONTH.
16:19:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I SECOND.
I AGREE WITH YOU THERE.
16:19:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IT SAYS ALCOHOL BEVERAGE.
16:19:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
JUST SAYING ONE THURSDAY OF THE NIGHT
IS ALCOHOL BEVERAGE AND THE OTHER IS LAND USE.
THIS WOULD BE A LAND USE SO WE WOULD HAVE TWO LAND USE
HEARINGS, EVENING HEARINGS, AND ONE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE.
16:19:47 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
COULD YOU JUST --
16:19:50 >>BILL CARLSON:
COULD YOU TELL US THE DATES?
IT WAS ONLY SIX TIMES?
16:19:53 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
IT WAS ONLY FOR AN ADDITIONAL FOUR
HEARINGS.
IT WAS JUNE, YOU CAN HAVE EITHER THE FIRST OR THIRD THURSDAY
IN JUNE.
AND I RAN OVER TLMB.
AND THEN IT WAS AUGUST, OCTOBER, AND DECEMBER.
DECEMBER WAS YOUR ONLY ONE WHERE IT WOULD ONLY END UP BEING
TWO HEARINGS BECAUSE YOU ALREADY --
16:20:17 >>> WE HAVE A WINTER BREAK COMING UP AND WHATNOT.
SO EVERY OTHER MONTH.
16:20:20 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THAT SCHEDULE.
16:20:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM CARLSON.
SECOND FROM HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
MR. SHELBY?
16:20:32 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.
AGAIN THE START IS 5:01 P.M.
IS THAT CORRECT?
16:20:37 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
YES, SIR, 5:01 P.M.
16:20:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE OTHER QUESTION I THINK IT WAS
COUNCILMAN MEMBER VIERA TALKED ABOUT THE CONTINUATION OR NOT
OF THE TUESDAY COMMENDATION MEETINGS.
16:20:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, YES.
I WOULD SUGGEST, JUST SO WE RESPECT COUNCIL MEMBERS' TIMES,
BECAUSE A LOT OF US HAVE OTHER PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT,
ET CETERA, ET CETERA, THAT THE LAST --
16:21:03 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
ORIGINALLY IT WAS EASIER TO PULL IT OFF.
OH, IT'S ON THIS ENTIRE CALENDAR.
16:21:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
BUT WHICH IS THE LAST -- I THINK IT WAS
JUNE OR MAYBE EVEN --
16:21:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I BELIEVE THAT COUNCILMEMBER CITRO'S
REPRESENTATIVE AIDE HAS PUT ON THROUGH, LET'S SAY, AUGUST,
INCLUDING CITY EMPLOYEES?
16:21:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
EXCLUDING THE LAST ONE, IT LOOKS LIKE.
THANK YOU.
TAKE A LOOK.
ACTUALLY IT'S APRIL.
APRIL.
16:21:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SO ACTUALLY THE ONLY COMMENDATIONS ARE
NEXT MONTH, NEXT TUESDAY.
THEN AFTER THAT, ACCORDING TO THIS CALENDAR, UNLESS ANY
COUNCILMEMBER SET IT, MADAM CLERK, I DON'T SEE ANY
COMMENDATIONS FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE POLICE OFFICER,
THE FIREFIGHTER, AND THE ATU.
16:22:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AND THAT YOU SAID IN JUNE --
16:22:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MAY.
16:22:08 >>LUIS VIERA:
WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST, AND LET ME KNOW TO
MITIGATE SOME OF THAT, IS MAYBE WE DO THE MAY AND THEN
BEGINNING IN JUNE WE PUT THAT OFF UNTIL DECEMBER, AND THEN
WE JUST HAVE POLICE AND FIRE AND ATU DURING REGULAR
HEARINGS, AND THEN WE SEVERELY LIMIT OTHER COMMENDATIONS,
AND --
[ LAUGHTER ]
EVERYONE IS LOOKING AT ME.
EVERYONE IS LOOKING AT ME.
MAYBE I AM PREACHING TO MY OWN CHOIR HERE.
16:22:37 >>BILL CARLSON:
LIMITED TO FOUR OR FIVE EACH PER YEAR.
DO YOU WANT TO MAKE THAT MOTION?
[ LAUGHTER ]
16:22:54 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
16:22:56 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.
BUT IF YOU WANTED TO JUST TAKE THOSE DAYS OFF, WHY NOT EVERY
MONTH THAT WE HAVE AN EXTRA LAND USE MEETING, WE DON'T HAVE
COMMENDATIONS, AND THEN THE OTHER MONTHS, JULY, WE DO HAVE A
COMMENDATION ON TUESDAYS.
THEN IT'S THE SAME DAYS FOR US IN TERMS OF MEETINGS.
16:23:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
JUNE IS WHEN WE BEGIN THE EXTRA NIGHT
MEETING, RIGHT?
16:23:24 >> I AM GOING TO READ OFF TO YOU WHAT THOSE DATES ARE GOING
TO BE BECAUSE WE ALSO HAVE AN AUDIENCE JUST DYING TO KNOW --
16:23:31 >>> MAY, TUESDAY COMMENDATIONS.
JUNE WILL NOT.
JULY HAS IT.
SO EVERY OTHER MONTH THAT WE DON'T HAVE THAT EXTRA THURSDAY,
WE'LL HAVE THAT TUESDAY COMMENDATIONS.
16:23:42 >>LUIS VIERA:
AND IF I MAY, THE ONLY COMMENDATIONS WHAT I
VIEW WOULD CONTEMPLATE IN COUNCIL DURING THAT TIME, DURING
MEETING REGS MEETINGS, WOULD BE POLICE, FIRE AND ATU.
EVERYTHING ELSE --
16:23:54 >>> CITY EMPLOYEES AND WHATNOT.
THAT'S GREAT.
16:23:57 >> THE FOUR DATES WOULD BE JUNE 2nd, AUGUST 4th,
OCTOBER 6th -- SORRY.
16:24:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUNE 2nd.
AND THE JUNE 7th IS CANCELED, IS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING?
THE JUNE 7th COMMENDATION.
16:24:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE JUNE 7th COMMENDATION DAY WILL
BE CANCELED BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO GO FROM MAY TO JUN JULY
WITH THAT COMMENDATION.
16:24:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
GO AHEAD PLEASE.
16:24:26 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
JUNE 2nd AT 5:01 P.M. WOULD BE THE
FIRST ONE.
AUGUST 4th AT 5:01 P.M. WOULD BE THE SECOND.
AND THAT MONTH, YOU ARE AT FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES THE
SECOND WEEK, SO YOU DO HAVE THE PRESENTATION COMMENDATION ON
THE 16th.
SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CANCEL THAT NOW OR NOT.
WE ARE KIND OF TAG TEAM BOTH ITEMS RIGHT NOW.
16:24:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMAN CITRO IS FLORIDA LEAGUE OF
CITIES AMBASSADOR HERE.
16:25:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WELLS, BUT IT'S A TUESDAY.
SO THE QUESTION IS --
16:25:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE WILL BE ONE COUNCILMEMBER SHORT.
16:25:10 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
NO, YOU HAVE NO MEETING THE WEEK OF FLORIDA
LEAGUE OF CITIES.
16:25:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SO THE QUESTION IS WHETHER YOU WANT TO DO
WHAT YOU SAID TO CANCEL EVERY COMMENDATION, WANT TO KEEP
THAT THE 16th IN AUGUST.
THAT'S TUESDAY.
THAT'S THE QUESTION.
16:25:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HE WILL BE AT FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES
IF WE HAVE A TUESDAY COMMENDATION.
16:25:34 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
IT'S SCHEDULED THE TUESDAY AFTER.
16:25:37 >> BUT IT WOULDN'T BE BECAUSE IT WILL NOW IN SEPTEMBER IF WE
ARE DOING TUESDAY -- SO THE TUESDAY COMMENDATION WOULD BE
JULY.
AND NOVEMBER.
16:25:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SO CANCEL THE 16th OF AUGUST FOR
COMMENDATION TO BE CONSISTENT.
16:25:53 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
YES.
16:25:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I UNDERSTAND.
16:25:57 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT TAKES CARE OF AUGUST, MRS. FEELEY?
16:26:00 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
THE THIRD ADDITIONAL EVENING WOULD BE
OCTOBER 6th.
16:26:05 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SEPTEMBER THE SAME.
THEN OCTOBER AT 5:01.
THEN YOU HAVE THAT TUESDAY THE 11th, THE COMMENDATION.
AND --
16:26:15 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
THAT WOULD BE MOVED TO NOVEMBER.
16:26:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT THE COMMENDATIONS
FOR THAT MONTH THAT HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED WOULD THEN BE, IF I
UNDERSTAND MR. VIERA'S POSITION, WOULD BE THEN PUT ON A
REGULAR DAY, BUT IT'S ONLY THE CITY EMPLOYEES.
SO IT'S NOT THAT YOU LOSE THAT MONTH FOR GIVING THOSE
COMMENDATIONS.
THEY JUST GO TO A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
16:26:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ATU, POLICE AND FIRE.
16:26:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE CLERK WHO IS GOING
TO PREPARE THE CALENDAR GETS IT.
VERY GOOD.
COUNCILMAN CITRO'S OFFICE IF HE'S FINE WITH THAT.
16:26:57 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
THEN THE LAST ONE WOULD BE DECEMBER
1st.
SO THEN IN DECEMBER YOU WOULD HAVE THREE IN A ROW BUT YOU
ARE OFF THE LAST TWO WEEKS.
SO DECEMBER 1st AT 5:01 P.M. WOULD BE THE ADDITIONAL
HEARING NIGHT.
AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE AGAIN THE REGULAR 8th AND THE
15th.
16:27:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND WOULD YOU CANCEL THE 6th WHICH IS
A TUESDAY.
16:27:21 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THAT IS CORRECT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THAT?
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
THAT WAS EASIER THAN I THOUGHT.
16:27:34 >>ABBYE FEELEY:
THANK YOU VERY, VERY MUCH.
VERY MUCH APPRECIATED.
16:27:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AND THE FINAL ITEM OF THE DAY IS YOURS,
MR. SHELBY.
AND THIS IS TO DISCUSS THE CHARTER REVIEW WORKSHOP AND THE
FACILITATOR, AND WHAT DATE WORKS BEST FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS,
NOW THAT WE HAVE A FULL COUNCIL.
16:27:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
NOW THAT YOU HAVE A FULL COUNCIL I HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH
YOUR OFFICE TO CONFIRM THE DATES.
I WILL TELL YOU BECAUSE APRIL IS FILLED UP WITH ALREADY
NOTICED PUBLIC HEARINGS, ONE OF THE MAJOR CHALLENGES WAS
HAVING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THIS ROOM.
OBVIOUSLY WE WANT THIS TELEVISED AND COVERED.
THE DATE, THE DAY OF THE WEEK THAT SEEMED TO WORK BEST IN
MAY WAS MONDAY, AND I CHECKED THREE DATES IN MAY, AND THE
DATE WHERE THE ROOM IS AVAILABLE, EVERY COUNCILMEMBER'S
OFFICE OR THE COUNCILMEMBER HAS MADE THEMSELVES AVAILABLE TO
BE AVAILABLE ON THAT DATE, AND THE FACILITATOR AVAILABLE, IS
MAY 23rd.
16:28:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IS THAT FROM 9 A.M. TO 12?
16:28:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES, IT IS.
16:28:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SO THREE HOURS MAY 23rd IN THESE
CHAMBERS.
16:28:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES.
IT'S A MONDAY.
AND KEEPING MY FINGERS CROSSED THAT EVERYBODY CAN MAKE IT
BECAUSE THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE CANCELLATION AND THAT
WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE FACILITATOR MAKING THEMSELVES
AVAILABLE, NOT ON THAT DATE BUT ON WHATEVER DATE IT MAY BE
SCHEDULED.
16:28:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MR. SHELBY, THAT IS A PERFECT DATE.
16:28:56 >>BILL CARLSON:
SO MOVED.
16:28:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECOND
BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
MAY 23rd, 9 A.M. TO 12 IN THESE CHAMBERS.
16:29:05 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SPECIAL CALLED WORKSHOP.
16:29:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
TO DISCUSS THE CHARTER REVIEW WORKSHOP.
16:29:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WELL, NOT CHARTER REVIEW, JUST SPECIAL
CALL WORKSHOP ON THE CHARTER.
BECAUSE IT'S REALLY NOT A REVIEW.
16:29:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MAY 23rd, MONDAY, 9 A.M. TO 12 IN
THESE CHAMBERS.
16:29:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
ALSO, COUNCIL, I AM GOING TO SEND OUT AN
EMAIL WITH REGARD TO THAT, BUT I WOULD ASK THAT YOUR OFFICE
MAKE SURE YOU HAD THAT IN YOUR CALENDAR PLEASE.
THANK YOU.
16:29:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
WE GO TO INFORMATION REPORTS AND NEW BUSINESS.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
16:29:38 >> NOTHING.
16:29:41 >>CHAIRMAN:
A COUPLE THINGS.
THERE WAS CONFUSION TODAY ON THE USF STUDENT GOVERNMENT
FOLKS WHO I THINK ARE GOING TO BE COMING, AND THEY ARE
ACTUALLY GOING TO BE COMING WITH THE CONSENT OF THIS COUNCIL
ON APRIL 21st.
AND I WOULD MOTION FOR USF STUDENT GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF
COMING TODAY TO JUST TO BE BRIEFLY RECOGNIZED FOR A MINUTE
AT THE START OF THE MEETING ON THAT DAY.
16:30:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR.
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
YES, SIR.
16:30:06 >>LUIS VIERA:
THEN I WAS DOING SOME READING AND I SAW THAT
THE FIRST WOMAN APPARENTLY WHO CAME ONTO TAMPA POLICE
DEPARTMENT WAS LENORA ANNE BOOTH, ACTUALLY THE LATE MOTHER
OF CLARA REYNOLDS FROM THE CRISIS CENTER IN 1973 WHICH NEXT
YEAR WOULD BE 50 YEARS THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS HAD
WOMEN OFFICERS.
SO I WANTED TO MOTION TO REQUEST THE ADMINISTRATION FOR SOME
SORT OF MEMORIAL OR SOMETHING FOR FIFTY YEARS OF WOMEN
POLICE OFFICERS BEGINNING WITH LENORA ANNE BOOTH.
AND SINCE THAT'S NEXT YEAR I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT DURING
WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH IF POSSIBLE IN MARCH OF 2023.
AND THAT MAYBE THEY CAN COME BACK WITH AN IDEA FOR US IN,
GOSH, MR. SHELBY, CAN WE SCHEDULE IN OCTOBER?
OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR.
16:31:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HAVE THE CALENDAR HERE FOR OCTOBER.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSIONS OCTOBER 20th UNDER STAFF
REPORTS.
16:31:12 >>LUIS VIERA:
THAT'S FINE.
16:31:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
UNDER STAFF REPORTS, OCTOBER 20th
WILL BE THE DATE: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
ANYTHING ELSE?
16:31:24 >>LUIS VIERA:
NO, SIR.
THANK YOU.
16:31:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THAT WAS A GREAT MOTION, IT IS.
ABSOLUTELY.
IN 1971, THE FIRST WOMAN ON CITY COUNCIL.
1973, FIRST WOMAN POLICE OFFICER.
SO GOOD.
LEGALITY THEM BE ACKNOWLEDGED.
THEY DESERVE IT.
16:31:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
MANY OF YOU KNOW I AM ON THE TABLE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
AND THIS LAST TWO DAYS THERE HAS BEEN A REGIONAL SUMMIT FOR
RESILIENCY, AND I JUST WANT TO MENTION THAT CITY OF TAMPA
AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY WON TOP HONORS.
JUST TO NAME A FEW, TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WON THE
HERMAN W. TONER AWARD.
THE BUILD ENVIRONMENT AWARD WENT TO HARVEST OAK PARK
INVESTMENT PLUS VISION EQUALS CHANGE.
AND THAT WAS PART OF THE UNIVERSITY AREA CDC GRADUATION,
SARAH CULP ON THAT AWARD.
ALSO THE COMMUNITY PREPAREDNESS AND RESILIENCY AWARD WENT TO
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CITY TAMPA PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THE
EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY WON THE MOBILITY AWARD.
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE AWARD WINNERS AT THIS YEAR'S
RESILIENCY CONFERENCE.
CONGRATULATIONS.
WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY MOTION.
TO HAVE THE SUSTAINABILITY AND THE RESILIENCY OFFICER TO
APPEAR BEFORE COUNCIL TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE RESILIENCY
ACTION PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED LAST MAY AND DISCUSS THE
PROGRESS THAT WE HAVE MADE AND THE UPCOMING PROJECTS AND
OBJECTIVES.
AND ON THAT DATE, COUNCIL, MR. CHAIR, I AM LOOKING AT EITHER
MAY 19th OR MAY 5th, WHICHEVER IS MORE CONVENIENT.
16:33:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHENEVER WORKS FOR YOU.
MAY 5th --
16:33:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
LOOKS BUSIER.
16:33:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MAY 19th UNDER STAFF REPORTS?
16:33:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT WOULD BE FINE.
16:33:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION WHICH COUNCILMAN CITRO MAY 19TH
UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
YES, SIR.
ANYTHING ELSE?
16:33:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NOTHING.
THAT'S IT.
16:33:48 >>LUIS VIERA:
ONE THING I WANTED TO MENTION WHICH YOU
SHOULD HAVE MENTIONED, ONE OF THE EARLIEST WOMEN POLICE
OFFICERS IN THE CITY OF TAMPA WAS ACTUALLY JOE GRECO'S MOM.
A LOT OF FOLKS DON'T KNOW SHE WAS A COP.
ALSO IF I MAY, CONGRATULATIONS TO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
16:34:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HIGHLY, HIGHLY, HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
COUNCILMEMBER HURTAK.
16:34:22 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE NOTHING.
16:34:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
DID YOU ENJOY YOUR FIRST DAY?
16:34:25 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I DID.
16:34:26 >> YOU PASSED THE AUDITION.
16:34:30 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
16:34:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
NOTHING.
16:34:33 >>BILL CARLSON:
YOU ALL SEEM TO BE OKAY WITH LIMITING THE
NUMBER OF COMMENDATIONS.
IF YOU DISAGREE LET ME KNOW BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
MOTION TO ASK EACH COUNCILMEMBER TO LIMIT COMMENDATIONS TO
FIVE EACH PER YEAR.
16:34:45 >> FAME FINE WITH THAT.
16:34:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILMEMBER HAS A CARLSON.
IF WE HAVE THE VIERA BLESSING WE ARE GOOD.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
YES, SIR?
16:35:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF YOU WOULD PLACE THE MOTION.
I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT --
16:35:22 >>BILL CARLSON:
I SAID TO ASK SO IT'S NOT A RULE, IT'S JUST
TO ASK, A REQUEST.
16:35:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
16:35:32 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
I WAS ASKED -- I JUST GOT THIS -- WAS ASKED BY THE HEALTHY
BOND COALITION TO PASS A PROCLAMATION.
I HAVE NEVER DONE A PROCLAMATION.
DO WE DO PROCLAMATION OR COMMENDATIONS?
16:35:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IN THIS CASE YOU CAN DRAFT A RESOLUTION,
IF YOU WISH TO DO THAT.
A PROCLAMATION IS DONE BY THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, AND THERE'S A
PROCESS TO THAT.
BUT IF THEY WANT A MAYORAL PROCLAMATION THAT'S A DIFFERENT
PROCESS.
16:36:02 >>BILL CARLSON:
NO, THEY WANT US TO DO.
16:36:04 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THEN IT WOULD BE A RESOLUTION OF CITY
COUNCIL RECOGNIZING.
16:36:07 >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I MAKE A MOTION FOR RESOLUTION NOW?
16:36:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES.
WHEN DO YOU WANT IT TO COME BACK?
DO YOU WANT IT IN ADVANCE OF MAY, OR --
16:36:20 >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE IS THE DRAFT THAT THEY GAVE US BUT I
WOULD MAKE A MOTION --
16:36:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
COUNTY COME BACK ON THE 21st.
IF YOU WANT APRIL 21st --
16:36:32 >>BILL CARLSON:
APRIL 21.
16:36:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
OPPOSED?
16:36:39 >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU FOR BEARING WITH ME NOR A SECOND.
WHEN WE WERE TALKING LAST WEEK WITH THE SCHEDULING FOR MORE
DATES FOR DEVELOPMENT, I THINK WE ALL GOT A LOT OF CALLS
FROM DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CONCERNED BECAUSE THEY WANT US TO
ADD MORE DATES.
BUT EQUALLY OR MORE, THEY HAD ASKED US TO ASK THE STAFF TO
SPEED UP THE PERMITTING PROCESS.
AND I ASKED ABBYE AND NICOLE THAT LAST WEEK AND THEY TALKED
ABOUT IT A LITTLE BIT BUT I GOT A BUNCH OF CALLS AFTERWARDS
TO SAY CAN YOU PLEASE ASK THEM TO ELABORATE ON THAT?
BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REALLY CONCERNED THAT THE PROCESS IS
SLOW.
AND IT COULD BE BUDGET, THAT WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH STAFF,
OR -- THEN THEY STARTED TO DESCRIBE WHAT THE SOLUTIONS
REQUEST.
SO ANYWAY, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK DEVELOPMENT
STAFF TO REPORT ON MAY 19th ABOUT HOW THEY PLAN TO
REDUCE THE TIME FOR PERMITTING AND LAND USE APPLICATIONS
BEFORE THEY COME TO COUNCIL.
IT SOUND LIKE THEY ALREADY IDEAS ON HOW TO DO THIS SO FOR
THE PUBLIC'S PURPOSES I WOULD LIKE THEM TO EXPLAIN WHAT THEY
ARE DOING.
16:37:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WHAT DATE?
16:37:41 >>BILL CARLSON:
MAY 19th.
16:37:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
UNDER STAFF REPORTS?
16:37:45 >> UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
16:37:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANYTHING ELSE?
I HAVE A FEW ITEMS.
COUNCILMAN VIERA, I PASS THE GAVEL TO YOU.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO
THE --
(SPEAKING SPANISH)
WHO WILL BE VISITING TAMPA TO CELEBRATE THE BARRANQUILLA
CARNIVAL.
AS YOU KNOW, BARRANQUILLA IS THE OLDEST SISTER CITY, TO BE
PRESENTED OFF-SITE.
ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT WISHES TO JOIN ME, IT'S TOMORROW
NIGHT.
I'LL LET YOU KNOW WHERE.
16:38:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU FOR THE NOTICE.
[ LAUGHTER ]
16:38:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I THINK IT'S AT WHISKEY NORTH ON DALE
MABRY.
16:38:30 >>LUIS VIERA:
I WILL BE WALKING MY BIKE TOMORROW NIGHT.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
16:38:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THE NEXT IS A MOTION TO PRESENT THE PARKS AND REC MASTER
PLAN INTERIM FINDINGS BY CONSULTANT AECOM, 15-MINUTE
PRESENTATION, APRIL 21st, 2022, WHICH IS A REGULAR
MEETING.
16:39:05 >>LUIS VIERA:
MOTION BY CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
16:39:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AND THEN I HAVE A REQUEST THAT WE
PAY -- THAT I PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO MOTIONS MADE UNDER NEW
BUSINESS, HEAR THE ENTIRE MOTION, JUST IN CASE THERE NEEDS
TO BE DISCUSSION.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION -- NO?
SO BASICALLY, WHAT I TYPED UP HERE, MY AIDE TYPED UP THAT WE
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO MOTIONS MADE UNDER NEW BUSINESS JUST
IN CASE THERE'S NEED FOR DISCUSSION OR NOT, AND THAT'S IT.
THAT'S JUST A COURTESY THING.
OH, NO, I HAVE GOT SOMETHING HERE.
I HAVE TONS OF PAPER.
ANOTHER ONE IS THE LOCAL HOUSING -- WHAT?
OH, THAT WAS JUST A THING.
DIDN'T NEED A MOTION, JUST A DISCUSSION.
SO THE LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR A PRESENTATION TO
COME TO COUNCIL APRIL 21st, 2022, TO PRESENT THE FINAL
LP FINDINGS FROM THE FLORIDA HOUSING COALITION.
BEFORE WE SUBMIT IT PRAYER TO THE FLORIDA HOUSING COALITION
ON MAY 2nd.
SO THAT WE GET THIS LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN OUTLINING
HOW GRANT FUNDS WILL BE USED.
WE HAVE DEADLINES OF MAY 2nd, 2022.
I WOULD LIKE THAT TO COME TO COUNCIL APRIL 21st, 2022 AT
9 A.M.
16:40:47 >>CHAIRMAN:
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
16:40:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
LET'S SEE HERE.
NOW TO DISCUSS THE OPPORTUNITY ZONE PROSPECTUS AND MARKET
REPORT.
I DON'T HAVE CLARIFICATION.
LISA, WHEN DID I HAVE TO MAKE THE MOTION ON THIS?
DID THEY GIVE US A DATE?
16:41:05 >> [OFF MICROPHONE] APRIL 21st UNDER STAFF REPORTS,
CORRECT?
OKAY.
SO THIS IS A PRESENTATION UNDER STAFF REPORTS FOR A REPORT
REGARDING THE OPPORTUNITY ZONE PROSPECTUS AND MARKET REPORT,
APRIL 21st UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
16:41:21 >>LUIS VIERA:
WE HAVE A MOTION BY CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
16:41:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND WAS THERE SOMETHING WITH REGARD TO
RECONSIDERATION OF THE PARKS AND REC MOTION THAT WAS
PREVIOUSLY MADE?
16:41:37 >> WE NEED TO MAKE THE MOTION FOR THAT FOR A WORKSHOP.
I BELIEVE THE APRIL WORKSHOP, I HAVE IT ON APRIL 28th, I
BELIEVE.
16:41:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
APRIL WORKSHOP IS GOING TO BE -- THE
APRIL 28th WORKSHOP.
I WOULD LIKE TO MODIFY MY PREVIOUS MOTION SO THAT THE PARKS
AND REC MASTER PLAN INTERIM FINDINGS BY THE CONSULTANT
AECOM, A 15-MINUTE PRESENTATION, COME TO US AT THE APRIL
28th WORKSHOP MEETING.
16:42:12 >>LUIS VIERA:
WE HAVE A MOTION BY CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL THIS FAVOR?
16:42:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND MR. CHAIRMAN, IF THAT IS GOING TO BE A
PRESENTATION BY AECOM, WOULD YOU WANT TO MAKE THAT EARLIER
IN THE AGENDA?
16:42:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
16:42:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE FIRST ONE IS A PRESENTATION BY THE
NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY WITH A 10-MINUTE PRESENTATION
REGARDING THE LONG-TERM ISSUES AROUND MacDILL.
BUT DO YOU WANT TO MAKE IT THE SECOND PRESENTATION?
16:42:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
LET'S JUST MAKE IT AS THE SECOND
PRESENTATION.
THAT'S FINE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
DO I HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE?
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE ADJOURNED.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.