TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, APRIL 14, 2022
5:01 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
17:06:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD AFTERNOON.
17:06:39 I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO
17:06:40 ORDER.
17:06:43 MR. SHELBY, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO READ, SIR?
17:06:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, I DO --
17:06:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT A MINUTE.
17:06:49 ROLL CALL.
17:06:50 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
17:06:51 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
17:06:53 >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
17:06:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
17:06:57 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
17:06:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
17:06:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
17:07:02 >>CLERK: YOU HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
17:07:03 THANKS.
17:07:04 MR. SHELBY.
17:07:07 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
17:07:10 TONIGHT'S MEETING APRIL 14 IS HERE WITH AN IN-PERSON
17:07:13 QUORUM AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE HERE
17:07:17 IN CITY COUNCIL EITHER BY ATTENDING IN PERSON IN CITY
17:07:22 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, OR VIDEO
17:07:26 TELECONFERENCING AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY.
17:07:29 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PREREGISTRATION IS NECESSARY TO
17:07:32 PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY ON A PUBLIC HEARING ON
17:07:36 QUASI-JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE MATTERS.
17:07:39 FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE VIA CMT,
17:07:43 DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS ARE AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
17:07:48 A REMINDER, IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE VIA CMT, YOU MUST
17:07:52 HAVE ACCESS TO COMMUNICATION MEDIA DEVICE OF A TABLET
17:07:56 OR COMPUTER EQUIPPED WITH A MICROPHONE AND VIDEO THAT
17:08:00 WILL ENABLE YOU TO BE HEARD AND SEEN BY AUDIO AND
17:08:01 VIDEO.
17:08:06 FOR TWO-WAY VIRTUAL MEETINGS, SMARTPHONES ARE NOT
17:08:09 COMPATIBLE BECAUSE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO SHARE YOUR
17:08:11 CAMERA WHEN CONNECTED.
17:08:15 IF YOU NEED INFORMATION, IT IS ON THE CITY COUNCIL WEB
17:08:17 PAGE AND ALSO IN THE AGENDA OF TONIGHT'S MEETING.
17:08:25 ALSO, COUNCIL, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU NOT -- IF YOU HAVE
17:08:28 ANY EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, THAT YOU DO DISCLOSE THEM.
17:08:30 AND IF YOU RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICALLY
17:08:34 DURING THE MEETING RELATIVE TO TONIGHT'S HEARING, THAT
17:08:36 YOU IMMEDIATELY DISCLOSE THEM PLEASE.
17:08:39 A REMINDER TO THE PUBLIC TO NOT COMMUNICATE WITH THE
17:08:41 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ELECTRONICALLY DURING THE COURSE
17:08:45 OF THE MEETING OUTSIDE OF THE PARAMETERS OF THIS PUBLIC
17:08:45 HEARING.
17:08:50 THAT BEING SAID, ALSO, IF YOU ARE ON THE GO TO MEETING
17:08:53 PLATFORM, APPEARING VIRTUALLY, PLEASE BE REMINDED THAT
17:08:57 THE CHAT SECTION IS NOT TO BE COMMUNICATING WITH CITY
17:09:00 COUNCILMEMBERS, ONLY FOR TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES AND
17:09:02 TECHNICAL ISSUES.
17:09:05 WITH ALL THAT BEING SAID, MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL ASK
17:09:10 COUNCIL TO WAIVE THE RULES TO ALLOW CMT PARTICIPATION.
17:09:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVED.
17:09:13 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:09:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR.
17:09:16 OPPOSED?
17:09:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MY UNDERSTANDING THAT COUNCILMAN
17:09:21 VIERA IS ONLINE.
17:09:25 AND A MOTION TO HAVE HIM PARTICIPATE.
17:09:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND.
17:09:28 ANY OPPOSED?
17:09:29 ALL RIGHT.
17:09:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
17:09:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO MOVE ITEM 1-13.
17:09:36 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
17:09:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR.
17:09:39 AYE?
17:09:40 OPPOSED?
17:09:43 ALL RIGHT, BEFORE WE BEGIN, I KNOW THERE IS
17:09:47 HOUSEKEEPING FROM I SEE HERE, ITEMS 3 AND 4, A REQUEST
17:09:48 OF CONTINUANCE TO MAY 12.
17:09:52 AND ITEM NUMBER 9 IS AN E-MAIL TO WITHDRAW.
17:09:57 YES, SIR.
17:10:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I AM SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN, IF YOU WANT
17:10:03 TO TAKE THOSE UP FIRST.
17:10:04 A REQUEST AFTER YOU TAKE CARE OF THOSE.
17:10:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
17:10:08 WE WILL START WITH ITEM 3 AND 4.
17:10:10 A LETTER FROM MR. TYLER HUDSON.
17:10:15 AND THIS IS A REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO MAY 12.
17:10:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. HUDSON, I SEE HIM HERE.
17:10:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE IS RIGHT THERE.
17:10:25 ALL RIGHT.
17:10:28 >>TYLER HUDSON: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:10:31 TYLER HUDSON, ASHLEY DRIVE.
17:10:34 I DO NOT LIKE TO ASK FOR CONTINUANCES AND LET ME
17:10:40 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN WHY WE NEED ONE, THE GTE CREDIT UNION
17:10:44 ADJACENT TO ENCORE AVENUE.
17:10:47 HENDERSON AVENUE -- YOU CAN SEE OFFER THE OVERHEAD.
17:10:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU WANT TO PULL THAT UP.
17:10:56 >>TYLER HUDSON: HENDERSON AVENUE -- THERE IS AN
17:10:59 OPPORTUNITY TO RECONNECT HENDERSON AVENUE --
17:11:01 >>TYLER HUDSON: YOU GUYS GOT IT?
17:11:04 AN OPPORTUNITY RECONNECT HENDERSON AVENUE AS PART OF
17:11:06 THE STREET GRID IN THIS AREA.
17:11:08 IN YELLOW IS WHERE THE SUBJECT SITE IS.
17:11:11 THAT ACTUALLY HAS BEEN VACATED.
17:11:13 WHAT THE MOBILITY DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY WANTS US TO DO
17:11:16 IS TO GIVE THAT BACK TO THE CITY, TO ESSENTIALLY OPEN
17:11:19 UP HENDERSON THERE, AND THIS WILL LEAVE JUST THE
17:11:22 PORTION IN BLUE WHICH IS THE MOBLEY PARK APARTMENTS AS
17:11:25 THE LAST REMAINING ITEM THAT WOULD NEED TO GET RESOLVED
17:11:27 TO RECONNECT THE GRID HERE.
17:11:30 I THOUGHT 30 DAYS WOULD BE NOW HANDLE THE OPEN ISSUES
17:11:33 AND THAT IS MY FELT THAT IT WASN'T, BUT I AM VERY
17:11:36 CONFIDENT BY MAY 12, WE WILL HAVE EVERYTHING IN ORDER
17:11:39 WE ARE MOBILITY TO PRESENT THE SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS THE
17:11:42 RETURN OF HENDERSON AVENUE BACK TO THE CITY SO THAT
17:11:44 EVENTUALLY CAN BE RECONNECTED.
17:11:46 I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
17:11:50 BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
17:11:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY TO SPEAK
17:11:54 ON THE CONTINUANCE FOR 3 AND 4.
17:11:56 THE ITEM WILL BE HEARD MAY 12.
17:11:58 WE WON'T BE HEARING IT TONIGHT.
17:11:59 WE HAVE A MOTION -- YES, SIR.
17:12:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MIRANDA, YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING
17:12:03 TO MAKE A MOTION.
17:12:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:12:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DATE AND TIME.
17:12:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 12, 5:01.
17:12:14 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN
17:12:20 CITRO FOR ITEMS 3 AND 4 TO MAY 12, 2021, 5:01.
17:12:22 A MOTION AND A SECOND.
17:12:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO A ROLL CALL BECAUSE MR. VIERA IS
17:12:26 REMOTE.
17:12:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:12:34 >>CLERK: VIERA?
17:12:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:12:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:12:37 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:12:38 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
17:12:41 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:12:43 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT
17:12:44 VOTE.
17:12:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT ITEM A REQUEST TO WITHDRAW.
17:12:49 MR. MICHELINI, SIR.
17:12:55 ITEM NUMBER 9.
17:12:58 OR DO YOU JUST WANT TO GO FOR THE E-MAIL.
17:12:59 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:13:02 I AM NOT SURE HOW MY NAME GOT ON THIS.
17:13:04 BUT NOT MY PROJECT.
17:13:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SORRY.
17:13:09 >> IF THEY WANT TO WITHDRAW IT, THAT'S FINE WITH ME.
17:13:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MISTAKE WITH YOUR NAME.
17:13:16 AN E-MAIL FROM DUANE MILFORD, THE APPLICANT'S
17:13:19 REPRESENTATIVE, TO WITHDRAW ITEM NUMBER 9.
17:13:20 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION.
17:13:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:13:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL.
17:13:24 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
17:13:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:13:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:13:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:13:30 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:13:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:13:34 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT
17:13:36 VOTE.
17:13:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, YES, SIR.
17:13:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FULL BE GOING INTO THE MEETING -- THE
17:13:43 HEARINGS TONIGHT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I JUST WANT TO MAKE
17:13:47 SURE THIS IS CLEAR FOR THE RECORD THAT COUNCIL RECEIVED
17:13:50 NEWLY REVISED REVISION SHEETS ON CERTAIN HEARINGS
17:13:51 TONIGHT.
17:13:55 AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK COUNCIL AFTER I -- RATHER THAN
17:13:58 DO THEM INDIVIDUALLY TO READ THEM INTO THE RECORD AND
17:14:01 COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE SUBSTITUTION FOR THE REVISION
17:14:03 SHEETS, THE REVISED REVISION SHEETS.
17:14:09 THAT WILL BE ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ 21-46, ITEM NUMBER 6,
17:14:17 REZ 21-85, REZ 21-99 IS NUMBER 7.
17:14:22 AND NUMBER 11, REZ 22-19.
17:14:26 ITEM NUMBER 12, 22-20.
17:14:32 AND LASTLY, REZ 22-21, NUMBER 13.
17:14:35 THESE HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE CLERK AND THEY HAVE
17:14:40 BEEN UPLOADED TO SIRE.
17:14:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION .
17:14:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
17:14:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:14:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR.
17:14:49 ROLL CALL.
17:14:50 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:14:52 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
17:14:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:14:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:14:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:14:57 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:14:59 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT
17:15:02 VOTE.
17:15:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
17:15:10 ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:15:11 ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:15:14 ALL RIGHT, DANNY COLLINS IS ON THE LINE.
17:15:16 GO AHEAD, SIR.
17:15:29 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE?
17:15:34 GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR
17:15:36 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:15:40 TODAY WE WILL BE PRESENTING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
17:15:46 AMENDMENT, TCA/CPA 21-14.
17:15:49 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
17:15:53 PLANNING DISTRICT AND SHOWN HERE IN OUR LOCATIONAL MAP.
17:15:56 IT IS IN THE OLD WEST TAMPA NEIGHBORHOOD AND WITHIN THE
17:16:00 WEST TAMPA NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
17:16:03 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND
17:16:03 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
17:16:07 YOU WILL SEE THIS SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN THIS
17:16:08 BLACK COLOR.
17:16:14 PRESENTLY THERE IS THE BUSTILLO AND DIAZ BROTHERS CIGAR FACTORY IN
17:16:16 THE NORTHWESTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:16:19 THE SUBJECT SITE IS GENERALLY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
17:16:22 OF NORTH ALBANY AVENUE AND WEST WALNUT STREET.
17:16:26 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN
17:16:26 CHARACTER.
17:16:30 THERE ARE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES
17:16:30 DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH.
17:16:35 TO THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AS YOU
17:16:39 MOVE NORTH ALONG ALBANY AVENUE, THERE IS ANOTHER CIGAR
17:16:42 FACTORY JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:16:45 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO ONE BLOCK EAST OF NORTH HOWARD
17:16:46 AVENUE.
17:16:49 THIS SEGMENT OF NORTH HOWARD AVENUE CONTAINS
17:16:53 PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
17:16:56 HERE IS AN IMAGE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:17:00 THIS IS THE DIAZ BROTHERS CIGAR FACTORY WHICH IS
17:17:02 LOCATED AS I SAID IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
17:17:03 SUBJECT SITE.
17:17:07 AN IMAGE JUST LOOKING EAST AT NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
17:17:10 HERE IS AN IMAGE LOOKING AT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE
17:17:13 PLAN AMENDMENT FROM NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
17:17:14 HERE IS ANOTHER IMAGE.
17:17:18 THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHWEST AT THE PLAN AMENDMENT SITE
17:17:20 FROM WEST PINE STREET.
17:17:24 THIS IS LOOKING EAST ON WEST PINE AVENUE -- I AM SORRY
17:17:26 WEST PINE STREET.
17:17:27 THE SITE IS ON THE RIGHT.
17:17:31 THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE PLAN AMENDMENT SITE
17:17:35 FROM THE INTERSECTION OF WEST WALNUT STREET AND NORTH
17:17:36 ALBANY AVENUE.
17:17:39 THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ALONG NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
17:17:43 THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN HERE ON THE RIGHT.
17:17:45 JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND.
17:17:48 THIS IS A PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT THAT WAS
17:17:53 ORIGINALLY PART OF MAY 2021 CYCLE OF PLAN AMENDMENTS.
17:17:55 SMALL SCALE IN SIZE.
17:17:58 IT IS APPROXIMATELY 1.33 ACRES.
17:18:03 CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT SITE HAS A SPLIT LAND USE.
17:18:07 HALF THE SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL,
17:18:10 AND THE REMINDING PORTION OF THE SITE IS RECOGNIZED
17:18:13 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
17:18:17 THE REQUEST TODAY IS TO RECOGNIZE ITS ENTIRE SITE UNDER
17:18:21 RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
17:18:24 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
17:18:26 YOU WILL SEE THIS GRAY AT THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE
17:18:29 SUBJECT SITE.
17:18:32 IT REPRESENTS THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION WHICH IS
17:18:36 APPROXIMATELY A MIX OF .67 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:18:41 THE REMAINING .66 ACRES IS THE RESIDENTIAL-35 THAT IS
17:18:45 SHOWN AT THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE AND THEN AT
17:18:48 THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF
17:18:51 WALNUT STREET AND NORTH ALBANY.
17:18:56 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL-35.
17:18:58 RESIDENTIAL-35 IS TO THE NORTH, EAST, WEST OF THE
17:18:59 SUBJECT SITE.
17:19:03 AS YOU MOVE SOUTH ALONG NORTH ALBANY AVENUE, PARCELS
17:19:06 RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20.
17:19:09 AND FURTHER SOUTH ARE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
17:19:11 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 DESIGNATION.
17:19:14 I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT, YOU KNOW, ONE BLOCK TO THE
17:19:18 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN IN THIS GRAY COLOR IS
17:19:23 PARCEL UNDER THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION.
17:19:25 THERE ARE TWO BLOCK.
17:19:28 APPROXIMATELY TWO BLOCKS EAST OF THE SITE IS NORTH ROME
17:19:34 AVENUE AND SOME PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE MMU-35.
17:19:39 AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FROM AND 35 DESIGNATION.
17:19:41 THE REQUEST WOULD RECOGNIZE -- REMOVE THE LIGHT
17:19:44 INDUSTRIAL PORTIONS OF THE SITE AND RECOGNIZE THE
17:19:50 ENTIRE SITE UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
17:19:53 HERE IS THE SLIDE SHOW AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE
17:19:54 PROPOSED CHANGE.
17:19:57 CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 23
17:20:02 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 61,000 SQUARE FEET OF
17:20:04 NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:20:07 CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL USES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED ON THE
17:20:10 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PORTIONS OF THE SITE.
17:20:14 AS PROPOSED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION,
17:20:18 THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR A 46 DWELLING
17:20:26 UNITS FOR 34,759 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
17:20:27 NONRESIDENTIAL USES UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35
17:20:32 DESIGNATION WOULD HAVE TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA THAT
17:20:36 IS DEFINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:20:38 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT
17:20:40 CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
17:20:42 PLAN.
17:20:44 IT WAS CONSIDERED -- IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
17:20:48 DESIGN AND CITY PLANNING STRATEGY IN PROMOTING A
17:20:56 COMPACT CITY -- COMPACT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
17:20:59 IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE URBAN VILLAGE POLICIES,
17:21:03 DIRECTING THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TO URBAN
17:21:06 VILLAGES AND CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT SPEAK TO
17:21:10 REDAPTIVE REUSE WITHIN THE URBAN VILLAGES.
17:21:15 THE REQUEST WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIFAMILY
17:21:18 -- MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS HOUSING SECTIONS OF
17:21:23 THE PLAN BY PROMOTING HOUSING WITHIN THE URBAN
17:21:24 VILLAGES.
17:21:27 AND ALSO IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE INFRASTRUCTURE,
17:21:32 SPECIFICALLY INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY 1.17, WHICH DIRECTS
17:21:36 GROWTH TO THOSE URBAN VILLAGES.
17:21:39 BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
17:21:42 RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND
17:21:47 CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF
17:21:48 THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:21:50 THIS INCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE TO
17:21:51 ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
17:21:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OF THE GENTLEMAN?
17:21:56 HEARING NONE.
17:21:57 YES, SIR.
17:22:00 >>FRANK HALL: FRANK HALL WITH YOUR CITY PLANNING STAFF.
17:22:04 AS I PLACED IN FRONT OF YOU, SOME UPDATES TO OUR
17:22:05 ORIGINAL COMMENTS.
17:22:08 WE ARE STILL -- WE ARE -- WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE
17:22:08 REQUEST.
17:22:13 I JUST WANTED TO ADD SOME ADDITIONAL MEAT TO OUR -- TO
17:22:14 OUR INITIAL COMMENTS.
17:22:19 IF YOU WILL TAKE A QUICK LOOK AT THE REVIEW CRITERIA
17:22:22 FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENTS.
17:22:26 PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXCERPTS MENTIONED
17:22:29 PREVIOUSLY, WE WILL HAVE SUPPORT FOR ADDITIONAL
17:22:34 RESIDENTIAL INFILL AND ESPECIALLY WITH THE AREAS THAT
17:22:39 ARE -- APPROXIMATELY -- PROXIMITY, RATHER TO
17:22:42 EMPLOYMENT, SERVICES AND TRANSIT.
17:22:46 THE SECOND PAGE, YOU WILL NOTE THAT WE ADDED UNDER
17:22:48 SECTION A, THAT PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT SITE INCLUDING
17:22:51 THE PROPERTIES NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST ARE
17:22:53 DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL-35.
17:22:58 SO THAT IS, AGAIN, SUPPORTING THIS -- THIS REQUEST.
17:23:02 DOWN TO THE -- TO SECTION B, SUBJECT IS WITHIN A
17:23:06 QUARTER MILE OF THE DESIGNATED TRANSITS CORRIDOR.
17:23:10 CLOSEST TRANSIT SPOT IS ONE BLOCK WEST OF THE SUBJECT
17:23:14 SITE NORTH HOWARD, I BELIEVE THAT IS ROUTE 14.
17:23:18 AND GO ALL THE WAY DOWN TOWARD THE BOTTOM, ITEM NUMBER
17:23:21 2, RATHER, YOU WILL SEE BASED ON HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
17:23:24 PATTERNS OF THE AREA AND THE AGE OF THE STRUCTURES AND
17:23:27 LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS IN RELATION WITH THE
17:23:30 CORE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE CITY, THE STAFF BELIEVES THAT
17:23:34 THE R-35 LAND USE CATEGORY IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF
17:23:36 THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE.
17:23:40 AND I JUST WANTED TO LEAVE THOSE IN FOR THE RECORD.
17:23:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
17:23:42 ANY QUESTIONS?
17:23:43 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:23:47 NEXT UP, MR. MECHANIK.
17:23:49 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS.
17:23:51 MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK.
17:23:56 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE
17:23:57 APPLICANT.
17:24:01 YOU JUST HEARD VERY, VERY THOROUGH REPORTS FROM THE
17:24:05 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND THE CITY STAFF, AND I
17:24:09 WILL NOT GO AHEAD AND REPEAT ALL THOSE SAME POINTS.
17:24:14 I WILL JUST LIKE TO EMPHASIZE THAT THIS PROPERTY IS IN
17:24:16 THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
17:24:19 IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU WILL WANT TO ENCOURAGE URBAN
17:24:21 INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
17:24:24 AND YOU WILL SHORTLY SEE A REZONING APPLICATION WHERE
17:24:31 WE ARE PROPOSING ON THIS PROPERTY AN APPROPRIATE URBAN
17:24:32 INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
17:24:36 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR
17:24:38 RESIDENTIAL-35.
17:24:42 THE PROPERTIES ON ALL SIDES OF THIS PROPERTY ARE
17:24:44 DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL-35.
17:24:50 SO IT IS ENTIRELY COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA.
17:24:53 AND WITH THAT, I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
17:24:53 THANK YOU.
17:24:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTION FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
17:24:59 REMEMBER, THERE IS A TRAVELING REZONING WITH THIS.
17:25:02 ANY QUESTIONS?
17:25:03 NOPE?
17:25:05 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
17:25:08 THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:25:09 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
17:25:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
17:25:12 GUDES.
17:25:14 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:25:16 ALL IN FAVOR.
17:25:17 AYE.
17:25:18 ALL RIGHT.
17:25:21 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 1.
17:25:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:25:27 FILE NO. TA/CPA 21-14, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
17:25:28 FIRST READING.
17:25:31 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA
17:25:35 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE
17:25:39 LAND USE MAP, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2111 NORTH
17:25:44 ALBANY AVENUE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, LI, AND
17:25:51 RESIDENTIAL-35, R-35, TO RESIDENTIAL-35, R-35,
17:25:55 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT,
17:25:59 PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDE CAN AN EFFECTIVE
17:26:01 DATE.
17:26:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION.
17:26:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
17:26:06 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
17:26:08 >>CLERK: VIERA?
17:26:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE MUTED, SIR.
17:26:10 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:26:11 I AM SORRY, YES.
17:26:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:26:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:26:14 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:26:15 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:26:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:26:19 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:26:26 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MAY 5 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:26:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY.
17:26:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF MR. MECHANIK READY FOR ITEM NUMBER
17:26:34 6.
17:26:38 >> THAT WILL BE FINE.
17:26:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BEFORE WE DO IF YOU ARE GOING TO
17:26:45 SPEAK ON ANYTHING ELSE ON THE AGENDA IN OUR QUASI-
17:26:50 JUDICIAL HEARINGS, SO IF YOU WILL, PLEASE STAND AND WE
17:26:52 WILL SWEAR EVERYONE IN AT ONCE.
17:26:54 [SWEARING IN]
17:26:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, WE WILL GO TO ITEM
17:26:57 NUMBER 6 FOR MR. MECHANIK.
17:27:05 WE WILL BEGIN.
17:27:09 [SWEARING IN]
17:27:11 >>CLERK: THANK YOU.
17:27:15 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND
17:27:15 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
17:27:22 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6, CASE REZ-21-5 FOR THE PROPOSED
17:27:26 REZONING OF 2111 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE PROPOSED REZONING
17:27:32 FROM CI, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, RM-16, RESIDENTIAL
17:27:38 MULTIFAMILY TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD,
17:27:42 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND RESIDENTIAL
17:27:43 MULTIFAMILY.
17:27:46 I WILL PASS IT ON TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
17:27:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS.
17:27:52 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
17:27:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:28:02 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING
17:28:02 COMMISSION STAFF.
17:28:04 WE HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
17:28:09 THE NEXT CASE IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
17:28:12 RAY PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY BEING
17:28:15 LOCATED WANT QUARTER MILE TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE
17:28:16 SUBJECT SITE.
17:28:19 TRANSITS IS LOCATED TO THE NORTH ALONG NORTH HOWARD
17:28:22 AVENUE.
17:28:25 THIS ROUTE PROVIDES CONNECTION TO WEST DOWNTOWN.
17:28:31 THIS AMENDMENT -- SORRY, THIS REZONING IS A COMPANION
17:28:39 AMENDMENT -- COMPANION REZONING WITH FILE NO, REZ-21-14
17:28:42 AND MOVED FORWARD.
17:28:46 AND THIS IS AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND
17:28:48 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
17:28:50 THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
17:28:54 WALNUT STREET NORTH.
17:28:59 AND AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER PPD.
17:29:02 AND PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIES THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:29:05 AND HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITH THE
17:29:10 APPROVAL OF TCA-21-14, THE ENTIRE SITE WILL BE
17:29:13 RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION THAT
17:29:16 R-35 SURROUNDS THE SITE ON BOTH SIDES.
17:29:19 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND
17:29:21 FOUND CONSISTENT WITH A NUMBER OF POLICIES IN THE
17:29:22 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:29:25 THE APPLICANT IS REDEVELOPING A CIGAR FACTORY THAT IS
17:29:31 ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION FOR MULTIFAMILY USES.
17:29:35 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTAINS PRESERVATION OF
17:29:38 HISTORIC STRUCTURES THROUGH ADAPTIVE USE.
17:29:43 AND 5.1.7 TO PROPOSE 21 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
17:29:45 WITHIN THE CIGAR FACTORY.
17:29:47 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THAT THE APPLICANT
17:29:53 PROVIDE A NOTE REFERENCING LAND USE POLICY 5.1.7 ON THE
17:29:56 SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
17:29:58 THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE DESIGN AND
17:30:01 DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND MULTIFAMILY
17:30:03 INCLUDING ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR, SIDEWALK AND
17:30:04 STREET.
17:30:07 THE ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT COARSE TO ALL
17:30:10 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS IS ORIENTED TOWARD THE SIDEWALK AND
17:30:10 STREETS.
17:30:14 THE ENTRANCE TO THE EXISTING CIGAR IS ORIENTED TO THE
17:30:16 SIDEWALK ON NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
17:30:18 THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE
17:30:21 REQUEST CONSISTENCY WITH THIS POLICY DIRECTION.
17:30:26 ADDITIONALLY THE PD PROVIDES INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN
17:30:29 CONNECTION SO THEY CAN ACCESS THE AMENITIES IN THE SITE
17:30:32 AND ACCESS TRANSIT AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES PROVIDED
17:30:35 ALONG NORTH HOWARD AVENUE WHICH IS TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
17:30:38 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -- SORRY, THE REQUEST WILL
17:30:41 PROMOTE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH
17:30:48 THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY OF THE AVAILABLE HOUSING
17:30:51 FOR WALKING AND NEAR EMPLOYMENT CONCENTRATIONS,
17:30:53 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
17:30:56 FURTHERMORE, THE REQUEST WILL ADD ADDITIONAL HOUSING
17:30:59 CHOICES WITHIN THE OLD WEST TAMPA NEIGHBORHOOD AND
17:31:02 PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF THE WEST TAMPA HISTORIC
17:31:03 DISTRICTS.
17:31:05 BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
17:31:07 STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
17:31:09 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:31:11 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
17:31:14 I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
17:31:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. COLLINS?
17:31:17 HEARING NONE?
17:31:19 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN.
17:31:22 CASE REZ 21-85.
17:31:24 THE APPLICANT HERE IS DAVID MECHANIK.
17:31:29 WE WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE WHAT I HAVE.
17:31:30 CAN YOU SEE THE --
17:31:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOT YET.
17:31:34 ACTIVATE THE -- THERE IT IS.
17:31:35 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: WONDERFUL.
17:31:39 THERE ARE FIVE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED, MOSTLY TO DUE
17:31:42 WITH NATURAL RESOURCES, URBAN DESIGN OR TRANSPORTATION
17:31:47 HERE.
17:31:51 AND AGAIN, YOU WILL SEE AN OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE PARCEL
17:31:57 OUTLINED IN RED AROUND THE PARCEL, WE WILL HAVE
17:32:00 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
17:32:03 TO THE NORTH, SOUTH -- SORRY, TO THE NORTH, YOU WILL
17:32:04 HAVE RM-16.
17:32:08 TO THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST, YOU WILL HAVE RS-50.
17:32:14 THE WHOLE ENTIRE SUBJECT PARCEL IS 61,162 SQUARE FEET
17:32:16 OR 1.4 ACRES.
17:32:19 PART OF THE LOT HERE IS VACANT AS I WILL SHOW YOU ON
17:32:20 THE SITE PLAN.
17:32:23 PART OF THE LOT IS VACANT AND PART IS A CIGAR FACTORY
17:32:25 AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
17:32:28 LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH ALBANY, WEST PINE
17:32:31 STREET AND WEST WALNUT STREET.
17:32:43 THE PROPOSED PROJECT -- I WILL SHOW YOU THE NEXT --
17:32:46 PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR 21 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
17:32:50 UNITS WITHIN THE EXISTING CIGAR FACTORY.
17:32:52 AND THAT, ALSO, YOU WILL HAVE TEN SINGLE-FAMILY
17:32:55 ATTACHED UNITS TO THE SOUTH.
17:33:04 AS YOU WILL SEE, THE PROPOSED PARKING IS TO THE EAST.
17:33:07 THE BUILDING HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED TOWN HOMES TO THE
17:33:09 SOUTH IS 38 FEET TALL.
17:33:13 EXISTING CIGAR FACTORY IS 48 FEET TALL, A TOTAL OF 69
17:33:18 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, AND 66 PARKING SPACES ARE
17:33:19 BEING PROVIDED.
17:33:23 VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROVIDED ON WEST PINE STREET AND
17:33:27 WEST WALNUT STREET.
17:33:32 MOVING ALONG, YOU WILL SEE THE ELEVATIONS.
17:33:38 TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST.
17:33:41 AND THEN AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE -- I WILL SHARE SOME
17:33:47 PICTURES.
17:33:53 THE CURRENT SITE, AS YOU SEE HERE, SIGNS ARE UP, CIGAR
17:33:59 FACTORY.
17:34:02 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE AND THE NORTH OF THE SITE IS
17:34:08 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES WE TALKED ABOUT.
17:34:11 I WENT TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES
17:34:13 OF THE VACANT LOT.
17:34:15 AND ALSO EAST OF THE SITE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
17:34:20 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE.
17:34:24 AND THEN ALSO, HERE YOU GO, ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
17:34:28 THE CIGAR FACTORY AND THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL
17:34:30 HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES RUNNING NORTH AND
17:34:34 SOUTH.
17:34:38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEW AND
17:34:41 FOUND INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
17:34:41 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
17:34:44 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE
17:34:47 APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND ALSO FOR
17:34:52 ALL REVISIONS ON THE REVISION SHEET IF APPROVED BY
17:34:53 COUNCIL.
17:34:55 THANK YOU, I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
17:34:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS.
17:34:58 DID YOU FIND IT INCONSISTENT BECAUSE OF THE PARK
17:34:59 SOMETHING IN.
17:35:01 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: WE FOUND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE
17:35:03 NUMBER OF WAIVERS FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND
17:35:04 TRANSPORTATION.
17:35:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
17:35:07 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
17:35:08 NO?
17:35:09 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:35:16 MR. MECHANIK.
17:35:19 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS.
17:35:22 MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE
17:35:26 PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT.
17:35:31 I HAVE WITH ME THE PROPERTY OWNER OMAR GARCIA, RALPH
17:35:36 SCHULER, THE ARCHITECT, AND RICKY PETERIKA, THE
17:35:41 ARBORIST, SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS FOR HIM.
17:35:43 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY FOR THE RECORD THAT WE DO
17:35:49 AGREE WITH THE RECOMMENDED REVISIONS.
17:35:55 AND I WOULD POINT OUT THAT MOST OF THE REVISIONS IF --
17:35:59 WHICH WE INTENDS TO MAKE RESOLVE THE MAJORITY OF THE
17:36:05 INCONSISTENCIES REGARDING THE APPLICATION.
17:36:10 AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. GARCIA TO GIVE
17:36:15 YOU AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND TO ADDRESS OUR
17:36:20 PARKING WAIVER WHICH I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EMPHASIZE TO
17:36:23 COUNCIL, THERE IS A MINOR REQUEST, A 5% REDUCTION IN
17:36:24 THE PARKING.
17:36:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:36:31 MR. GARCIA.
17:36:33 >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCILMEMBERS.
17:36:35 SORRY FOR MY ATTIRE.
17:36:37 I HAVE A SICK WIFE AND DAUGHTER AT HOME.
17:36:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOUR NAME.
17:36:41 >> OMAR GARCIA.
17:36:46 JUST WANTED TO SAY -- MY NAME IS OMAR GARCIA, ONE OF
17:36:49 THE MANAGERS OF WEST TAMPA DEVELOPMENT GROUP.
17:36:54 THE INVESTORS INVOLVED IN THE WEST RIVER FLATS AND 220
17:36:56 MADISON IN DOWNTOWN TAMPA.
17:36:59 I WANT TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THE TRACK RECORD AND
17:37:02 INSIGHT WHAT WE HAVE IN TERMS OF PARKING.
17:37:05 WITH ACTUAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE AREA AND ALSO
17:37:08 OUR BACKGROUND OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION.
17:37:12 WEST RIVER FLATS WAS 135-UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY
17:37:15 LOCATED A COUPLE OF BLOCKS AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED SITE.
17:37:18 WHEN WE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED WEST RIVER FLATS IN 2014,
17:37:23 THERE WAS OVER 40 VACANT UNITS BASICALLY UNINHABITABLE.
17:37:25 ROOFS WERE LEAKING.
17:37:27 AIR CONDITIONING ABOUT 30 YEARS OLD.
17:37:28 WE DID A LOT OF REPAIRS TO IT.
17:37:31 DURING THAT TIME, WE ALSO WORKED WITH TAMPA HOUSING,
17:37:34 NORTH BOULEVARD HOMES GROUP AND PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE TO
17:37:37 RELOCATE SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT NEEDED TO STAY IN THE
17:37:38 AREA.
17:37:41 SO WE WORKED WITH THEM ON THAT, THE NEED TO STAY IN THE
17:37:42 WEST RIVER AREA.
17:37:45 WE ALSO WORKED HAND IN HAND WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
17:37:47 POLICE DEPARTMENT TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY
17:37:49 AND BASICALLY ELIMINATE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN THE
17:37:52 COMMUNITY AND IMPROVE THE OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:37:55 IN FACT OUR CAMERA SYSTEMS THAT WE INSTALLED ASSISTED
17:37:58 TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN SOLVING A DOUBLE HOMICIDE
17:38:00 JUST DOWN THE STREET ON WALNUT.
17:38:04 FAST FORWARD TO 2020, AND WEST RIVER FLATS WAS 100%
17:38:05 OCCUPIED.
17:38:10 WE PUT 40 UNINHABITABLE UNITS INTO SERVICE WITH MODERN
17:38:11 UPGRADES.
17:38:12 CONSTRUCTED A COMMUNITY POOL.
17:38:13 BUILT A DOG PARK.
17:38:15 REPLACED ALL THE ROOFS.
17:38:18 UPGRADED PARKING AND LED LIGHTING THROUGHOUT THE
17:38:18 PROPERTY.
17:38:21 BASED ON OUR EXPERIENCE OF WEST RIVER FLATS WHICH IS
17:38:26 LOCATED FROM THE BUSTILLO AND DIAZ BROTHERS CIGAR FACTORY,
17:38:29 ONE PARKING SPOT FOR THE APARTMENT WHICH TURNED OUT TO
17:38:31 BE MORE THAN SUFFICIENT FOR OUR NEEDS.
17:38:36 220 PROPERTY LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE
17:38:37 POLICE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS.
17:38:41 WE PURCHASED THAT PROPERTY IN 2020 -- SORRY, 2017.
17:38:43 IT WAS ESSENTIALLY A VACANT OFFICE BUILDING WITH
17:38:46 SIGNIFICANTLY DEFERRED MAINTENANCE.
17:38:50 PART OF THE MASONRY CURTAIN WALL HAD COLLAPSED IN THE
17:38:53 URBAN CANTINA RESTAURANT NEXT DOOR.
17:38:55 THE BUILDING HAD BEEN IN FORECLOSURE SEVERAL TIMES
17:38:59 BECAUSE NOBODY COULD DO WITH AN OFFICE BUILDING WITH NO
17:39:00 PARKING.
17:39:04 220 IS BROUGHT BACK TO LIFE AND THIRD YEAR OF 100%
17:39:10 OCCUPANCY, 136-BED STUDENT HOUSING AND OVER 150 PEOPLE
17:39:13 ON OUR WAITING LIST AFTER BEING FULLY LEASED OUT FOR
17:39:17 FALL OF 2021, AND WE ARE ALREADY FULLY LEASED UP FOR
17:39:20 FALL OF 2022 SINCE JANUARY.
17:39:22 SHOWS YOU THE DEMAND.
17:39:25 2020 AWARDED THE PLANNING COMMISSION JAN ABEL AWARD
17:39:27 FOR HISTORICAL PRESERVATION.
17:39:31 220 MADISON IS LOCALLY AND NATIONALLY DESIGNATED AS A
17:39:33 HISTORIC LANDMARK.
17:39:37 OVER 136 RESIDENTS, WE HAVE ZERO PARKING.
17:39:42 OUR RESIDENTS WALK, UBER, SKATEBOARD OR RIDE A BIKE.
17:39:44 WE ARE REQUESTING APPROVAL REZONING FROM INDUSTRIAL TO
17:39:46 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL RESTORE ITS FORMER
17:39:53 BASTILLO AND CIGAR FACTORY TO CONVERT INTO MORE
17:39:53 HOUSING.
17:39:57 WE BELIEVE THE PAST ZONING DID NOT FIT WELL IN WHAT IS
17:40:00 ESSENTIALLY AN INDUSTRIAL -- IN A RESIDENTIAL
17:40:00 NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:40:05 THE BUSTILLO BROTHERS AND CIGAR FACTORY IS IN
17:40:07 SIGNIFICANT STATE OF DISREPAIR.
17:40:12 WE WANT TO REPLACE THE WINDOWS, ROOF, REPOINTING THE
17:40:14 BRICK, AND WE WILL BE WORKING WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
17:40:19 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION TO DESIGNATE IT INTO A LOCALLY
17:40:24 AND NATIONALLY DESIGNATED LANDMARK.
17:40:28 WORKING WITH JVRB ARCHITECTS, THE ARCHITECTURE FIRM
17:40:31 LOCATED IN THE WEST TAMPA COMMUNITY TO ASSIST US WITH
17:40:31 THE DESIGN.
17:40:36 WE ARE IN A HOUSING CRISIS IN TAMPA AND HELP BRING MORE
17:40:39 HOUSING CLOSER TO THE URBAN CORE AND REMOVING THE
17:40:41 INDUSTRIAL USE FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
17:40:45 WE ARE REQUESTING A VERY MODEST PARKING VARIANCE THAT
17:40:47 WE BELIEVE IS SUPPORTED BY OUR PRIOR PROJECTS LIKE 220
17:40:48 MADISON COMMUNITY.
17:40:53 WE HOPE OUR CIGAR LOFT COMMUNITY WILL AGAIN ANOTHER
17:40:54 AWARD-WINNING PROJECT.
17:40:56 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL ON THE PARKING
17:40:58 VARIANCE.
17:41:00 AND OTHER VARIANCES.
17:41:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:41:02 LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION.
17:41:05 ON THAT GREEN SPACE ON YOUR PROPERTY WHERE IT IS
17:41:09 PROPOSED TO BUILD -- WHAT IS IT, THE TEN.
17:41:11 >> TEN TOWN HOMES, YES, SIR.
17:41:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOUSES OVER THERE HISTORICALLY
17:41:15 THAT WERE TORN DOWN?
17:41:20 >> SO I BELIEVE IF YOU LOOK BACK, THERE WAS A CHURCH
17:41:21 THERE.
17:41:26 AND I AM -- DENNIS FERNANDEZ IS PROBABLY THE RIGHT
17:41:31 GUY TO GO FOR THIS, BUT I BELIEVE IT WAS ST. JOSEPH'S
17:41:31 CHURCH.
17:41:37 IF YOU GO DOWN THE STREET, ACADEMY OF HOLY NAME SCHOOL
17:41:38 IS THE ORIGINAL LOCATION.
17:41:40 I BELIEVE THERE WAS A CHURCH THERE.
17:41:44 I DON'T KNOW IF ANY HOMES AT THAT POINT IN TIME.
17:41:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS?
17:41:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY.
17:41:49 I AM SEEING TWO DIFFERENT SITE PLANS.
17:41:55 ONE WHICH HAS THE PARKING WHICH IS DIAGONAL PARKING AND
17:41:57 ONE PERPENDICULAR, LINED UP IN A ROW.
17:42:00 WHICH SITE PLAN ARE YOU SUBMITS SOMETHING IN.
17:42:02 >> THE ONE PERPENDICULAR.
17:42:05 THE ORIGINAL ANGULAR ONE WAS BASED ON THE VACATING OF
17:42:09 THE ALLEY, WHICH THE TRANSPORTATION OBJECTED TO.
17:42:12 WE THEN LEFT THE ALLEY AND PROVIDED EASEMENT GOING
17:42:16 NORTH, AND THAT ALLOWED FOR THE CHANGE OR GRANTED THE
17:42:19 CHANGE FOR THE -- FOR THE RECONFIGURED PARKING
17:42:22 ARRANGEMENT.
17:42:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT MR. MECHANIK
17:42:25 SAID.
17:42:28 WHAT IS THE PERCENTAGE OF PARKING IN THE WAIVER.
17:42:30 >> I BELIEVE IT IS 5%.
17:42:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO: 5%.
17:42:33 >> YES, SIR.
17:42:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SEE A NUMBER OF COMPACT CAR AND
17:42:37 MOTORCYCLE SPACES.
17:42:41 WHAT ELSE ARE YOU DOING TO OFFSET THAT 5%.
17:42:44 >> WE WILL HAVE A BICYCLE STORAGE AREA WHICH IS A HUGE
17:42:46 THING FOR OUR 220 MADISON PROPERTY.
17:42:48 A LOT OF RESIDENTS USE IT.
17:42:50 WE EXPECT THAT TO BE THE SAME FOR THIS PROPERTY AS
17:42:52 WELL.
17:42:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
17:42:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
17:42:57 YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:43:00 >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM FAMILIAR WITH THAT WEST TAMPA.
17:43:03 MORE LIKE STUDENT HOUSING IN THAT RESIDENTIAL AREA?
17:43:06 >> HOUSING FOR ANYONE, BUT I CAN TELL YOU RIGHT NOW
17:43:09 THAT IN THAT AREA, THERE IS A LOT OF -- UT STUDENTS ARE
17:43:12 ALREADY TAKING UP HOUSING IN THAT AREA.
17:43:16 SO THAT -- THAT IS GOING TO BE OBVIOUSLY A -- POTENTIAL
17:43:19 FOR SOME STUDENTS TO MOVE TO THE PROPERTY, YES, SIR.
17:43:21 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITS REASON I ASK THAT, THE OLDER
17:43:24 COMMUNITY WHERE THE CIGAR FACTORY IS.
17:43:27 >> YES, SIR -- I AM SORRY, SIR.
17:43:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: AN OLDER -- I KNOW SOME OF THE
17:43:32 RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY COMPLAINING OF THE STUDENTS IN
17:43:33 THOSE COMMUNITIES.
17:43:35 I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT KINDS OF HOUSING.
17:43:39 WE KEPT TALKING ABOUT BICYCLES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
17:43:43 THAT MEANS UT STUDENTS WITHIN A COMMUNITY.
17:43:46 WANTED TO KNOW WHAT KINDS OF HOUSING THAT IS GOING TO
17:43:46 BE THERE.
17:43:49 >> ANYONE IS ENCOURAGED TO LIVE THERE.
17:43:52 OBVIOUSLY FAIR HOUSING DOES NOT ALLOW US TO SELECT
17:43:55 BASED ON ANY KIND OF -- BUT CLEARLY, THERE IS A DEMANDS
17:43:59 FOR HOUSING THE AREA BOTH FROM UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AND
17:44:01 LOCAL RESIDENTS.
17:44:03 IT IS PUTTING HUGE PRESSURE IN THE AREA.
17:44:06 I THINK WITH OUR WEST RIVER PROPERTY, WE WERE ABLE TO
17:44:09 BRING A LOT OF UNUSED UNITS BACK TO LIFE.
17:44:12 WE HOPE TO DO THE SAME THING WITH SOMETHING THAT HAS
17:44:14 BASICALLY BEEN SITTING THERE VACANT, UNUSED WITH NO
17:44:15 HOUSING.
17:44:18 WE PLAN ON HAVING, YOU KNOW, INCREASING THE HOUSING
17:44:20 STOCK IN THE AREA WHICH SHOULD HOPEFULLY ALLEVIATE
17:44:23 HOUSING ISSUES IN THE AREA.
17:44:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU.
17:44:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
17:44:28 DO YOU HAVE ANY RENDERINGS OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO
17:44:28 BUILD.
17:44:31 THE TEN UNITS, WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO LOOK LIKE.
17:44:34 BEING IT IS A BRICK CIGAR FACTORY.
17:44:36 MATCH THE HISTORIC CHARACTER?
17:44:38 >> I WILL LEAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS TO OUR ARCHITECT THAT
17:44:40 CAN PROBABLY ANSWER THEM IN GREATER DETAIL.
17:44:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
17:44:43 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:44:45 >> YES, SIR.
17:44:48 >> NEXT UP IS THE ARCHITECT, RALPH SCHULER.
17:44:52 AND HE WILL SHOW YOU SOME RENDERINGS OF THE PROPERTY.
17:44:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY.
17:44:56 >> AND ADDRESS THE OTHER WAIVERS.
17:44:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
17:44:58 PLEASE STATES YOUR NAME IS.
17:45:02 >> GOOD EVENING, RALPH SCHULER, NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
17:45:04 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
17:45:08 SO THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH AND REFINING
17:45:12 THESE PLANS, BUT I WILL ADDRESS MAINLY THE WAIVERS, OF
17:45:14 COURSE, THE PARKING WHICH WAS ALREADY DISCUSSED IS
17:45:16 REALLY ONLY THREE SPACES.
17:45:21 AND THEN THERE IS A WAIVER FOR BLOCK AVERAGING.
17:45:23 BLOCK AVERAGING BECAUSE WE ARE IN THE WEST TAMPA
17:45:28 OVERLAY DISTRICT.
17:45:33 BLOCK AVERAGE SOMETHING A STANDARD REQUEST THROUGH THAT
17:45:34 ON WALNUT.
17:45:41 WE ARE GOING FROM A BLOCK AVERAGE OF 15.5 AN GOING TO
17:45:41 18.
17:45:43 SO A LITTLE BIT DEEP THEY ARE.
17:45:46 MAINLY BECAUSE WE HAVE SOME -- WE HAVE NO ALLEY --
17:45:50 ALLEY THERE FOR PARKING -- SOME PARKING TO THE FRONT ON
17:45:53 WEST ALBANY.
17:45:56 AND I WILL SHOW THAT YOU REAL QUICK.
17:45:57 YEAH.
17:46:01 SO THAT WAS -- THIS BLOCK AVERAGE -- THIS BLOCK
17:46:01 AVERAGE.
17:46:05 THERE IS NO BLOCK AVERAGE BECAUSE NOTHING HERE BUT THE
17:46:08 CIGAR FACTORY ITSELF AND SEEMS LIKE A FUNNY NUMBER.
17:46:11 EXISTING CIGAR AT 29.5 FEET.
17:46:14 AND WE ARE GOING TO SETBACK OF 5 FEET.
17:46:19 WE ARE GOING TO HAVE REAR -- REAR-LOADED TOWN HOUSES
17:46:23 HERE AND THERE IS NO PARKING OFF OF WEST AVE -- WEST
17:46:26 ALBANY.
17:46:40 THE NEXT WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THIS -- THIS BUFFER.
17:46:41 WE WILL HAVE AN OPEN ALLEY.
17:46:46 SO THAT BUFFER -- CAN'T BE GRANTED FOR FIVE FEET,
17:46:50 BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO BE USING IT FOR VEHICULAR USE.
17:46:53 THAT WAIVER GOES FROM FIVE TO ZERO.
17:46:59 AND THEN, ALSO, THE REQUIRED 50% RETENTION ON NONWOODED
17:47:01 SITES GREATER MAN IN ONE ACRE.
17:47:04 WE TECHNICALLY ARE GREATER THAN ONE ACRE BUT ONLY HAVE
17:47:07 FOUR TREES.
17:47:11 OUR ARBORIST CAN SPEAK MORE IN DETAIL WITH THAT.
17:47:13 SO WE ARE REMOVING MORE THAN 50% OF THE TREES OBVIOUSLY
17:47:19 WHEN YOU ONLY HAVE FOUR TREES, IT IS TOUGH TO MEET THAT
17:47:19 REQUIREMENT.
17:47:24 ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO QUICKLY REVIEW OUR DESIGN
17:47:27 PROPOSAL FOR THE ELEVATIONS.
17:47:31 SO THIS IS, OF COURSE, THE EXISTING CIGAR FACTORY.
17:47:35 WE WILL NEED TO MAKE IT MEET CODE TODAY, OF COURSE,
17:47:39 WITH FIRE, STAIRS, ELEVATORS AND ALL THE THINGS
17:47:43 REQUIRED FOR A MODERN BUILDING.
17:47:46 THE WEST ELEVATION WHICH IS THE MAIN ELEVATION ON
17:47:48 ALBANY REALLY WON'T CHANGE.
17:47:52 THIS IS BEYOND, SO -- YOU KNOW, IT IS IN THE
17:47:54 FOREGROUND.
17:47:57 AND THEN ON THE EAST ELEVATION IS WHERE OUR PARKING IS.
17:48:01 THIS IS GOING TO BE THE MAIN EGRESS AND INGRESS OF THE
17:48:07 PROJECT WITH A STAIR AND ELEVATOR WHICH IS STILL BEING
17:48:08 REFINED.
17:48:12 BUT SOME SORT OF A GLASS ENCLOSURE THAT DOESN'T TRY TO
17:48:18 MIMIC THE EXISTING CIGAR FACTORY BUT PROVIDES SOME
17:48:22 SIMILAR DETAILING TO WHAT OUR EXTERIOR FIRE STAIR WILL
17:48:22 BE.
17:48:25 SO THE SOUTH ELEVATION WHICH WOULD BE FACING INTERNAL,
17:48:30 AND THE NORTH ELEVATION WHICH IS -- FACES WEST PINE
17:48:34 STREET.
17:48:39 OUR ELEVATIONS FOR THE MULTIFAMILY -- OR SINGLE-FAMILY
17:48:41 ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES.
17:48:48 THIS IS THE SIX ON WALL PUT THAT ARE FACING SOUTH.
17:48:51 THERE IS A THREE-STORY PRODUCT WITH A MAIN ENTRANCE
17:48:52 FACING THE STREET.
17:48:57 WE HAVE A SINGLE ONE-CAR GARAGE.
17:48:58 HANDS IT IS MAINLY AGAIN.
17:49:02 WE HAVE NO ACCESS TO VEHICULAR ACCESS ANYWHERE ELSE ON
17:49:03 THE SITE.
17:49:08 AND THEN WE HAVE SOME BALCONIES ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
17:49:13 AND IT WILL BE A THREE BEDROOM, THREE AND A HALF BATH
17:49:13 PRODUCT.
17:49:17 SIMILAR HERE ON THE ALBANY AVENUE, WE HAVE A SLIGHTLY
17:49:23 DIFFERENT-LOOKING TOWN HOUSE THAT FACES, AGAIN, WEST ON
17:49:23 ALBANY.
17:49:27 THESE WILL ALL HAVE FRONT DOORS AND SMALL STOOP
17:49:27 ENTRANCE.
17:49:32 THEY ARE TWO-STORY LOOKING PRODUCT WITH A THIRD STORY
17:49:35 ON THE BACK HALF WITH A ROOFTOP DECK.
17:49:42 AND THOSE, AGAIN, HAVE OTHER ELEVATIONS.
17:49:45 WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
17:49:47 OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN.
17:49:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS IT GOING TO BE -- GO AHEAD.
17:49:52 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:49:54 I THINK WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO ASK THE SAME QUESTION.
17:49:57 WHAT KINDS OF MATERIALS ARE YOU GOING TO BE USING?
17:49:58 >> A MIXTURE OF MATERIALS.
17:50:02 WE ARE GOING TO ADD SOME BRICK PROBABLY AT THE BASE,
17:50:09 STUCCO AND POTENTIALLY SOME -- SOME DECORATIVE SIDING.
17:50:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO IT WILL COMPLEMENT THE HISTORIC
17:50:15 CHARACTER OF IT?
17:50:16 >> ABSOLUTELY.
17:50:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
17:50:19 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
17:50:21 MR. MECHANIK, ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE GO TO PUBLIC
17:50:22 COMMENT?
17:50:24 >> NO, SIR, WE ARE CONCLUDING OUR PRESENTATION.
17:50:26 WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
17:50:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC WISHES
17:50:30 TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
17:50:32 ITEM NUMBER 6?
17:50:32 YES, SIR.
17:50:33 GO AHEAD.
17:50:36 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOU APPROACH THE LECTERN.
17:50:39 >> MY NAME IS NATHAN HAGAN.
17:50:39 GOOD EVENING.
17:50:42 NICE BEING IN THIS ROOM FINALLY.
17:50:46 I JUST WANT TO SAY IF YOU SPOKE TO ME BEFORE, YOU KNOW
17:50:50 I RIDE MY BIKE FOR 90% OF THE TRIPS I TAKE AND I AM A
17:50:52 STUD -- STUDENT.
17:50:55 I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO
17:50:57 ARE LOOKING FOR HOUSING THAT WE ARE NOT PAYING FOR
17:50:58 PARKING.
17:51:00 I'M PRETTY MUCH THE DEMOGRAPHIC FOR THIS.
17:51:03 TO THAT END I WANT TO TALK OF THE PARKING A LITTLE BIT
17:51:03 MORE.
17:51:06 A THIRD OF THIS PROJECT IS PARKING.
17:51:08 AND I LIVE IN WEST TAMPA.
17:51:11 AND, AGAIN, I RIDE MY BIKE 90 FERRARI OF THE TIME.
17:51:15 I AM NOT SAYING IT IS EVERYBODY, BUT MARKETS FOR PEOPLE
17:51:17 WHO WANT TO LIVE THAT WAY AND THIS NEIGHBORHOOD DOES
17:51:19 NOT NEED HOUSING FOR CARS.
17:51:20 IT NEEDS HOUSING FOR PEOPLE.
17:51:24 I AM A LITTLE BIT DISAPPOINTING THAT WE ARE REQUIRING A
17:51:28 THIRD OF THE LOT USAGE TO BE SURFACE LOT.
17:51:31 THOSE ARE MY MANY COMMENTS.
17:51:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:51:33 ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK.
17:51:35 DO YOU HAVE ANYBODY VIRTUAL?
17:51:39 MR. PETERIKA STANDING BY.
17:51:42 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR THIS ITEM.
17:51:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MECHANIK, ANY REBUTTAL OR
17:51:47 ANYTHING AT THIS TIME?
17:51:50 >> NO, SIR, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
17:51:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BEFORE WE CLOSE, I THINK IT IS AN
17:51:53 AWESOME PROJECT.
17:51:58 ANYONE THAT GOES TO THE HISTORIC CIGAR FACTORY,
17:52:00 COMPLIMENTS TO YOU.
17:52:04 CIGAR FACTORY ARE WEST TAMPA'S CASTLES AN VERY UNIQUE
17:52:09 BECAUSE WE ARE THE CIGAR CAPITAL OF THE WORLD AND
17:52:12 COMPLIMENT YOU UNDERTAKING THIS BIG PROJECT AND
17:52:14 RESTORING AN PRESERVING HISTORY WHICH IS IMPORTANT AND
17:52:16 AT THE SAME TIME PROVIDING HOUSING WHICH WE ARE IN
17:52:17 GREAT NEED FOR.
17:52:18 SO ANYBODY ELSE?
17:52:20 IF NOT, MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:52:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO MOVED.
17:52:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION.
17:52:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO, READ ITEM NUMBER
17:52:35 6, SUBSTITUTE REVISION SHEET.
17:52:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:52:42 FILE NO. REZ-21-85.
17:52:44 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY
17:52:49 OF 2111 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
17:52:51 FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1,
17:52:54 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE
17:53:00 TO RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY TO RS-50,
17:53:04 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
17:53:08 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND RESIDENTIAL,
17:53:14 MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:53:19 THAT THE PETITIONER HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND IS
17:53:22 IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOALS, SUBJECT AND
17:53:26 POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IE CONSISTENT WITH
17:53:32 LAND USE OBJECTIVE 9.2.
17:53:34 ALSO COMPLIANT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, A
17:53:37 PURPOSE TO PROMOTE THE EFFECTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF
17:53:42 LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND I WILL ALSO INCLUDE WAIVERS
17:53:45 AND REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
17:53:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT THE SUBSTITUTE REVISION SHEET.
17:53:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO AND
17:53:57 SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA.
17:54:00 >>LYNN HURTAK: I WANTED TO SAY THAT I, TOO, LOVE THIS
17:54:04 PROJECT, BUT I WOULD -- I WOULD HAVE PERSONALLY WILLING
17:54:07 TO GO FURTHER WITH PARKING WAIVERS FOR THAT VERY
17:54:07 REASON.
17:54:10 THAT WAS SPOKEN TO EARLIER ABOUT PEOPLE IN THIS
17:54:15 PARTICULAR AREA REALLY WANTING ALTERNATE USES AND
17:54:21 BETTER USE OF LAND.
17:54:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO,
17:54:25 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:54:26 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:54:27 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
17:54:28 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:54:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:54:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:54:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:54:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:54:34 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17:54:38 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MAY 5, 9:30 A.M.
17:54:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCILMAN
17:54:40 CITRO.
17:54:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
17:54:46 I WANT TO ADD THAT THERE WERE MORE CIGAR FACTORIES IN
17:54:48 WEST TAMPA THAN THERE WERE IN YBOR CITY.
17:54:52 AND I AGREE, ANY TIME WE CAN SAVE A HISTORIC BUILDING
17:54:55 LIKE A CIGAR FACTORY, KUDOS TO THOSE PEOPLE.
17:54:58 THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
17:55:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: DON'T GET THE LATIN COMMUNITY
17:55:02 UPSET.
17:55:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AS LONG AS THEY DON'T PAINT IT WHITE.
17:55:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:55:12 ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:02:42 WE WILL TAKE FIVE-MINUTE RECESS, IF THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
18:02:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL.
18:02:52 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
18:02:53 >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
18:02:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
18:02:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
18:03:01 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
18:03:05 >>LUIS VIERA: VIERA IS HERE.
18:03:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND MIRANDA IS IN THE ROOM.
18:03:08 OKAY.
18:03:10 ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:03:16 ZAIN HUSSEIN.
18:03:20 ZAIN HUSSEIN.
18:03:21 THERE HE IS.
18:03:28 ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:03:30 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN,
18:03:31 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:03:38 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, CASE REZ-21-94, THIS REZONING AT
18:03:43 LOCATION 6107 SOUTH 4TH STREET AND PROPOSED REZONINGS FROM
18:03:47 60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50.
18:03:49 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
18:03:51 I WILL PASS IT ON TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:03:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS, GO AHEAD.
18:03:58 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN.
18:03:59 DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:04:01 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:04:03 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
18:04:07 AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE BALLAST POINT
18:04:11 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:04:15 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY SKYVIEW PARK
18:04:18 THAT IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET FROM THE
18:04:20 SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE.
18:04:23 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS ONE MILE TO THE WEST AT THE
18:04:26 INTERSECTION OF INTERBAY BOULEVARD AND SOUTH DALE MABRY
18:04:27 HIGHWAY.
18:04:31 THE SITE WITHIN A LEVEL "A" EVACUATION ZONE IN THE
18:04:33 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
18:04:34 AERIAL MATCH THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
18:04:36 PROPERTIES.
18:04:39 SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
18:04:43 SOUTH OF WEST BAY AND EAST OF SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE.
18:04:45 THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY
18:04:47 RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.
18:04:49 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES WITHIN THE SURROUNDING
18:04:54 AREA, AS WELL AS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES JUST TO
18:04:58 THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:05:01 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:05:03 SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10
18:05:07 LAND USE DESIGNATION WHICH TYPICALLY ALLOWS FOR
18:05:11 DEVELOPMENT UP TO TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
18:05:14 JUST TO THE -- THAT RESIDENTIAL-10 IS TO THE NORTH,
18:05:15 EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SITE.
18:05:19 AND DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SITES, ALONG MACDILL
18:05:22 ARE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20 LAND
18:05:24 USE DESIGNATION.
18:05:27 APPROXIMATELY ONE BLOCK NORTH, THE SITE ON SOUTH
18:05:32 MACDILL AVENUE, OUR PARCEL RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
18:05:34 COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
18:05:37 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWS THE REQUEST AND FINDS
18:05:40 THE REQUEST WILL NOT CAUSE ANY ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE
18:05:41 SURROUNDING AREA.
18:05:46 SOUTH 4TH STREET BETWEEN WEST BAY AVENUE IS PLANNED FOR
18:05:49 DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND
18:05:52 DENSITY OF THE STREET IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AT HALF OF
18:05:54 ITS ANTICIPATED DENSITY.
18:05:56 THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN'S HOUSING
18:06:00 POLICIES, THE PROPOSED RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT WILL
18:06:03 CREATE ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND TRANSIT AND
18:06:08 EMPLOYMENT LOCATED ALONG SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE.
18:06:12 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND
18:06:16 ENSURE THERE WILL BE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS OR HURRICANE
18:06:21 RESPONSE TIMES AND AMENDED NEGATIVE IMPACTS THAT MAY
18:06:22 EFFECT RESIDENTS IN THE FUTURE.
18:06:26 OVERALL, THIS REZONING WILL HAVE COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT
18:06:29 AND HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT
18:06:35 PATTERNS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE.
18:06:37 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT
18:06:41 WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE
18:06:41 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:06:42 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
18:06:44 I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:06:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
18:06:49 SEEING AND HEARING NONE, MR. ZAIN HUSSEIN.
18:06:52 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT.
18:06:55 CASE REZ-21-94.
18:06:59 THE APPLICANT IS JASON STARLING AND LORI DUVALL.
18:07:03 THIS BEING EUCLIDEAN, NO WAIVERS ARE REQUIRED OR
18:07:05 ALLOWED.
18:07:19 AS YOU SEE THE OVERHEAD VIEW -- CAN YOU SEE THE --
18:07:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEED TO ACTIVATE THE OVERHEAD.
18:07:29 IF WE CAN ACTIVATE THE OVERHEAD.
18:07:42 WE CAN'T SEE IT ON OUR SCREEN.
18:07:45 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: ALL RIGHT, IF YOU LOOK AT THE PLAT
18:07:50 HERE, YOU WILL SEE THE THREE LOTS, 12, 13 AND 14.
18:07:54 THE RS-50 DISTRICT ALLOWS FOR MAXIMUM OF ONE DWELLING
18:07:57 UNIT PER 5,000 SQUARE FEET WITH A MINIMUM LOT OF 50
18:07:57 FEET.
18:07:59 ONE, TWO, THREE.
18:08:02 SO, THEREFORE, MAXIMUM OF THREE DWELLING UNITS WILL BE
18:08:05 ALLOWED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL IF ALL OTHER LAND
18:08:07 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE MET.
18:08:18 KEEPING THIS HERE, THERE IS CURRENTLY A STRUCTURE ON
18:08:19 THE LOT.
18:08:20 ONE STRUCTURE.
18:08:23 THE PROPERTY CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 24,000 SQUARE FEET
18:08:26 OR APPROXIMATELY .55 ACRES.
18:08:30 THE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF INTERSECTION OF WEST
18:08:32 BAY AVENUE.
18:08:34 AND SOUTH 49 STREET.
18:08:37 AS I SAID, THE SITE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH ONE
18:08:39 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT.
18:08:43 TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND EAST.
18:08:45 TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST OF THE PARCEL, YOU WILL
18:08:48 HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
18:08:52 AND TO THE WEST OF THE PARCEL IS ZONED RM-16.
18:08:59 YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES.
18:09:10 AS WE MOVE TO THE CONFORMING MAP, STAFF HAS ANALYZED
18:09:14 THE CONFORMING MAP.
18:09:16 STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT 57% OF THE LOTS IN THE
18:09:21 STUDIED AREA, 50% OF THE LOTS IN THE SUBJECT BLOCK, 50%
18:09:29 IN BLOCK AND 57% OF THE BLOCK FACE IS LOT WIDTH OF 59.9
18:09:30 FEET OR LESS.
18:09:33 STAFF FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
18:09:40 PATTERN OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA AND BLOCK FACE.
18:09:44 MOVING ALONG TO THE PICTURES.
18:09:47 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, SOME AREAS WERE NOT
18:09:56 ACCESSIBLE DUE TO GATES AND FENCES, BUT THE SUBJECT
18:10:00 SITE -- THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE LEFT AND FACING THE
18:10:09 INTERSECTION AT WEST BAY AVENUE AND SOUTH 4TH STREET.
18:10:11 TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THOSE
18:10:14 RESIDENTIAL HOMES I WAS TALKING ABOUT.
18:10:21 ALONG 4TH STREET.
18:10:24 TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE MORE
18:10:29 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
18:10:33 AND TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE MORE
18:10:38 RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
18:10:41 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
18:10:43 THE APPLICANT APPLICATION AND FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH
18:10:45 THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
18:10:48 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, IF NEEDED.
18:10:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
18:10:50 GENTLEMAN?
18:10:51 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
18:10:53 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU, SIR.
18:11:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: APPLICANT?
18:11:07 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING
18:11:11 JASON STARLING AS THE PETITIONER FOR THIS PROJECT.
18:11:13 I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT, FIRST, THAT WE HAVE
18:11:14 CONSISTENT FINDING FROM BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
18:11:16 AND THE CITY STAFF.
18:11:20 AND THIS ANY SUBSEQUENT WAIVERS WILL HAVE TO FOLLOW
18:11:22 ADDITIONAL PROCESSES.
18:11:25 IN THE REZONING PROCESS, WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR WAIVERS
18:11:28 AND NONE CAN BE GRANTED.
18:11:31 WE HAVE TO MEET THE RS-50 FOR SETBACKS WHICH IS SEVEN
18:11:34 AND SEVEN ON EACH SIDE AND 20 AND 20 FEET IN THE FRONT
18:11:35 AND THE REAR.
18:11:37 I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU A COUPLE OF PHOTOGRAPHS
18:11:43 REGARDING THE AREA.
18:11:47 THE RED DOT REPRESENTS THE EXISTING SITE.
18:11:50 AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE NORTHWEST CORN WE ARE A LARGE
18:11:52 CHURCH AND A PARKING LOT.
18:11:54 AND YOU ALSO SEE MULTIFAMILY HERE.
18:12:00 AND I HAVE SOME -- SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF THOSE AS WELL.
18:12:02 THIS IS THE -- THE EXISTING PROPERTY THAT WE ARE ASKING
18:12:09 TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL THREE PLATED LOTS THAT WERE
18:12:11 ESTABLISHED IN 1922.
18:12:14 THIS IS GOING AROUND THE STREET, GOING AROUND THE
18:12:17 CORNER, SHOWING YOU THE MULTIFAMILY THINK THAT JUST
18:12:21 SHOWED YOU ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.
18:12:26 THE DUPLEXES THAT ARE ALSO IMMEDIATELY IN THE VICINITY.
18:12:31 THE CHURCH AND -- AND THE CHURCH PARKING LOT WHICH ARE
18:12:39 ALSO IN THE IMMEDIATE ADJACENT AREA.
18:12:42 WE ARE IN A RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
18:12:46 WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL FOR THE RS-50 TO BE
18:12:46 CONSIDERED.
18:12:51 AND AS STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, 57% OF THE AREA HOMES
18:12:56 HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE LESS THAN 60 FEET IN WIDTH AND 75% OF
18:13:01 THOSE ON THE IMMEDIATE BLOCK FACE ARE LESS THAN 60 FEET
18:13:02 IN WIDTH.
18:13:07 A MIX OF TOWN HOUSES, MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL IN THE
18:13:09 VICINITY AND TUCKED IN THE CORNER IN THE REAR AS I
18:13:12 SHOWS YOU ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.
18:13:16 AND IN THE REAR OF THOSE OTHER MULTIFAMILY TOWN HOUSES
18:13:20 AND DUPLEXES AND THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ARE UP TO
18:13:23 THE NORTH SIDE.
18:13:27 WE MEET ALL OF THE CRITERIA REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT
18:13:30 OF THIS PROJECT FOR CONSIDERATION TO COUNCIL.
18:13:34 AND IT IS BEING RECOMMENDED FAVORABLY TO YOU.
18:13:37 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALLOWS FOR THIS CONSIDERATION,
18:13:42 AND I AM GOING TO GO THROUGH THE VARIOUS COMP PLAN
18:13:46 PROVISIONS THAT ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE REPORT,
18:13:51 MEETING LAND USE OBJECTIVE 1.1, 1.1.8.,
18:13:57 LAND USE 2.1 UNDER CITY PLANNING STRATEGIES, 2.1.2.
18:14:01 LAND USE OBJECTIVE 8.14.
18:14:05 8.141.
18:14:13 AND OBJECTIVES 9.2, 9.2.1.3 AND.
18:14:19 9.5, 9.51, 9.53 AND ADEQUATE SITES FOR ACCOMMODATING
18:14:23 HOUSING, 1.3, 1.34.
18:14:27 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY PLANS AND OBJECTIVES 1.3.
18:14:31 LAND USE POLICY 1.310.
18:14:34 HURRICANE EVACUATION PLAN AND SHELTERS.
18:14:37 THIS TYPICALLY WOULD ALLOW FOR THE INFILL OF THESE
18:14:38 THREE UNITS.
18:14:41 AND THE DENSITY WILL BE BELOW THE RESIDENTIAL-10
18:14:45 ALLOWED FOR CONSIDERATION AND OVERALL, THE SIZE,
18:14:50 HEIGHT, WIDTH AND THE -- THE SCALE WOULD BE THE SAME
18:14:54 WITH A LIMIT OF 35 FEET IN HEIGHT WHICH IS TYPICAL FOR
18:14:56 THIS AREA.
18:14:58 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT
18:14:58 HAVE.
18:15:05 THIS IS APPROXIMATELY 2400 SQUARE FEET AND IT DOES
18:15:08 QUALIFY FOR THE THREE LOTS TO BE REESTABLISHED AS
18:15:09 ORIGINALLY PLATTED.
18:15:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
18:15:13 GENTLEMAN?
18:15:14 YES, SIR.
18:15:16 >>BILL CARLSON: MR. MICHELINI, IN SEVERAL CASES YOU
18:15:20 CITED CASE LAW, BUT DO YOU IT -- SECTION -- QUOTED
18:15:23 SECTION OF THE CODE, BUT DO IT SO FAST THAT NONE OF US
18:15:25 HAVE TIME TO WRITE IT DOWN.
18:15:27 CAN YOU POSSIBLY BRING COPIES OF THAT.
18:15:30 WE TAKE EVIDENCE FROM BOTH SIDES, BUT IT IS HELPFUL.
18:15:35 HELPFUL TO HAVE THAT IF WE CAN'T WRITE IT DOWN QUICKLY.
18:15:37 >> YOU HAVE THAT IN THE STAFF REPORT.
18:15:40 >>BILL CARLSON: WERE YOU CITING DIFFERENT ONES?
18:15:43 >> NO, RECITING TO YOU WHAT WAS CONTAINED IN YOUR STAFF
18:15:43 REPORT.
18:15:44 >>BILL CARLSON: OKAY.
18:15:47 >> AND WAS THE BASIS OF THE FINDING BEING CONSISTENT BY
18:15:48 THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:15:49 >>BILL CARLSON: ALL RIGHT.
18:15:51 >> HE WANTS GOING OFF RECORD ON THAT.
18:15:53 I WAS JUST RECITING.
18:15:55 >>BILL CARLSON: I THOUGHT YOU WERE READING YOUR OWN --
18:15:56 >> NO, SIR.
18:15:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:15:59 ANYBODY ELSE?
18:16:01 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM
18:16:02 NUMBER 2?
18:16:03 YES, SIR.
18:16:04 COME ON UP.
18:16:18 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
18:16:21 >> MY NAME IS NATHAN HAGAN.
18:16:25 I DON'T OFTEN COME TO PM HEARINGS SO I COME UP.
18:16:29 LAST YEAR, IT WAS MY BIRTHDAY AND I ASKED FOR COUNCIL
18:16:34 TO LEGALIZE TRIPLEXES CITYWIDE AND NOT EXACTLY WHAT.
18:16:38 BUT FAMILIES THAT MOVE TO TAMPA AND A VERY GOOD REASON
18:16:40 TO SUPPORT THIS VERY BASIC THING.
18:16:43 ALONG THE LINES OF BEING A VERY BASIC THING, I HOPE
18:16:45 THAT WHEN WE ARE EVALUATING OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
18:16:48 IN THE FUTURE WE ASK OURSELVES WHY THIS TYPE OF THING
18:16:51 NEEDS TO BE VOTED ON FOR FULL COUNCIL.
18:16:54 WE HAVE A BACKLOG OF PROJECTS AND CONCERN OF LIABILITY.
18:16:55 SO JUST SOMETHING TO CONSIDER.
18:16:56 THANK YOU.
18:16:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
18:17:03 ANYBODY ELSE?
18:17:07 TWO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:17:08 THEY ARE ON?
18:17:09 WERE THEY SWORN IN?
18:17:14 NO?
18:17:16 WE HAVE ONE -- WE HAVE TWO SPEAKERS.
18:17:18 PLEASE TURN YOUR CAMERAS ON AND UNMUTE YOURSELF AND
18:17:26 RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND SO WE CAN SWEAR YOU IN.
18:17:33 ALL RIGHT.
18:17:36 WE HAVE ONE MORE SPEAKER, I BELIEVE.
18:17:42 PLEASE TURN YOUR CAMERA ON.
18:17:49 OKAY.
18:17:52 IN THE MEANTIME, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND SWEAR
18:17:56 YOU IN.
18:18:02 [SWEARING IN]
18:18:04 >> YES.
18:18:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GO
18:18:07 AHEAD.
18:18:10 YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
18:18:11 GO AHEAD.
18:18:12 YOU CAN SPEAK.
18:18:14 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GO AHEAD.
18:18:19 YOU ARE SWORN IN.
18:18:22 GO AHEAD.
18:18:23 YOU CAN SPEAK.
18:18:27 GO AHEAD.
18:18:29 CAN YOU HEAR US?
18:18:29 >> OKAY.
18:18:30 YEAH.
18:18:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
18:18:32 YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
18:18:38 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GO AHEAD.
18:18:45 >> MY NAME IS CHARU AND AN UNIVERSITY STUDENT TO ATTEND
18:18:50 YOUR MEETING, SO, YEAH, I FORGOT TO SEND AN E-MAIL THAT
18:18:53 I -- I DON'T -- ACTUALLY NOTHING TO SAY.
18:18:57 JUST WANT TO -- YOU KNOW, JUST WANT TO ATTEND THIS
18:18:58 MEETING.
18:18:59 SORRY ABOUT THAT.
18:19:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:19:03 WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE.
18:19:04 >> YEAH, THANK YOU.
18:19:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE OTHER SPEAKER IS --
18:19:09 >>CLERK: THEY LOGGED OFF.
18:19:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S IT.
18:19:11 ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC.
18:19:19 IF NOT, DO YOU HAVE ANY REBUTTAL SIR?
18:19:20 >> NO, COUNCIL.
18:19:24 I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT ANY OF THE ISSUES OF INVOLVING
18:19:27 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AND FEMA WILL BE ADDRESSED AT
18:19:28 PERMITTING.
18:19:30 ALL OF THOSE ISSUES WILL BE ADDRESSED.
18:19:33 THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND REQUEST YOUR
18:19:33 APPROVAL.
18:19:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY FINAL QUESTIONS OF THE
18:19:37 APPLICANT BEFORE WE CLOSE.
18:19:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE.
18:19:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
18:19:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, WOULD YOU
18:19:48 MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 2.
18:19:50 >>LYNN HURTAK: ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST
18:19:53 READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
18:19:59 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 6107 SOUTH 4TH STREET IN THE
18:20:02 CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
18:20:07 SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS RS-60,
18:20:10 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL,
18:20:15 SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:20:18 >> SECOND.
18:20:21 >>LYNN HURTAK: I CAN -- I ALSO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND
18:20:24 REASONING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF
18:20:25 REPORTS.
18:20:30 I FIND THAT BASED ON COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
18:20:33 FOUND IN STAFF REPORTS, APPLICANTS REPORTS TESTIMONY
18:20:37 THAT ESTABLISHES THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE
18:20:42 OBJECTIVE 9.2 TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF
18:20:45 LAND CONSISTENT WITH HOUSING POLICY 1.34 THAT
18:20:48 ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND
18:20:52 AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, PROPOSED
18:20:55 USE PROMOTES THE SUFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND
18:20:57 AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
18:20:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD ENOUGH, MR. SHELBY?
18:21:01 ALL RIGHT, DO WE HAVE A SECOND.
18:21:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:21:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:21:06 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
18:21:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:21:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:21:10 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:21:11 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
18:21:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:21:15 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
18:21:20 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
18:21:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
18:21:24 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
18:21:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
18:21:28 MR. HAGAN, I HEARD WHAT YOU MENTIONED.
18:21:29 SOMETHING I HAVE BEEN THINKING ABOUT.
18:21:33 AND I MAY BRING IT UP TONIGHT OR NEXT THURSDAY.
18:21:38 SO THANK YOU, SIR.
18:21:41 ALL RIGHT ITEM NUMBER 4 WAS TAKEN CARE OF.
18:21:42 ITEM NUMBER 5.
18:21:44 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
18:21:47 ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:21:52 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5, CASE NUMBER REZ 21-46, THIS BEING
18:21:56 HEARD FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING AT 401 AND 505 NORTH
18:21:59 ROME AVENUE AND 1517 WEST GRAY STREET.
18:22:23 PROPOSED REZONING.
18:22:39 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
18:22:40 DANNY COLLINS AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
18:22:40 STAFF.
18:22:42 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:22:44 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
18:22:50 AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
18:22:54 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS THE PARK
18:22:57 WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN A HALF MILE TO THE NORTHWEST OF
18:22:58 THE SITE.
18:23:01 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP A QUARTER MILE TO THE SOUTH OF
18:23:02 THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:23:06 THE STOP PROVIDES SERVICE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND TAMPA
18:23:06 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.
18:23:11 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
18:23:14 AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND SUBJECT
18:23:15 SITE.
18:23:19 SUBJECT SITE IS NORTH OF FIG STREET AND EAST AND NORTH
18:23:24 OF ROME AVENUE AND SOUTH OF WEST CASS STREET.
18:23:26 YOU WILL SEE THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT ENTERS
18:23:28 PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER.
18:23:32 THERE ARE SOME MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE NORTH AS WELL AS
18:23:36 TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:23:39 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:23:42 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THREE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:23:50 THE SUBJECT SITE IS DESIGNATED CMU-35, 24 AND R-20.
18:23:52 IT IS IN THE SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THE SITE.
18:23:55 YOU WILL SEE KIND OF THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN KIND OF
18:23:59 IS CONSISTENT ALONG NORTH ROME AVENUE.
18:24:02 AND CMU-24 DIRECTLY TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT
18:24:03 SITE.
18:24:07 CMU-35 IS TO THE WEST AND EAST.
18:24:10 AND THEN THERE ARE SOME PARCELS DESIGNATED
18:24:15 RESIDENTIAL-20 SCATTERED ALONG WEST FIG TO THE SUBJECT
18:24:17 SITE.
18:24:20 THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PROJECT IN THE WEST TAMPA
18:24:23 URBAN VILLAGE IS IN AN AREA OF THE CENTRAL TAMPA
18:24:26 PLANNING DISTRICT OF A SURGE OF GROWTH OVER THE LAST
18:24:27 DECADE.
18:24:30 THE PROJECT ACCOMMODATES THE PLANNED LEVELS OF HOUSING
18:24:33 GROWTH WITH INCREASE OF DENSITY WITH THE INCLUSION OF
18:24:34 NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL SPACE.
18:24:37 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN FORMALLY DEFINES
18:24:40 SURROUNDING AREA; HOWEVER, IS TRANSITIONING TO MORE OF
18:24:42 A MIXED USE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:24:45 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS THIS TRANSITION AS IT
18:24:49 ENCOURAGES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND INFILL
18:24:52 DEVELOPMENT ON AN UNDERUTILIZED SITE.
18:24:55 FURTHER WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
18:24:58 WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE IS WITHIN EMPLOYMENT AND
18:25:02 TRANSIT, TWO COMMUNITY ASSETS THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE
18:25:04 PLAN ENCOURAGES INCREASING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
18:25:05 OPINION.
18:25:08 AND PROPOSED PD FOR SEVERAL COMPONENTS AND POLICY
18:25:10 DIRECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITHIN THE MIXED
18:25:13 USE CORRIDOR, THE COMPREHENSIVE ENCOURAGES A MIXTURE OF
18:25:16 USES AND DENSITY TO SUPPORT PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND
18:25:20 ENHANCE THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, URBAN NATURE.
18:25:23 PROPOSED PD ACCOMPLISHES THIS BY PLACING THE BUILDING
18:25:26 CLOSE TO THE SIDEWALKS AND ENTRY WAYS TO THE RETAIL
18:25:29 SPACES, STAIRS THAT LEAD TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT
18:25:31 FACE THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
18:25:34 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
18:25:37 READING THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS BE MADE.
18:25:40 THE ACREAGE OF EACH FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE
18:25:41 SITE PLAN.
18:25:44 SECOND REVISION TO CLEARLY INDICATE ON THE SITE PLAN
18:25:47 THE LOCATION OF ALL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
18:25:51 THE THIRD REVISION TO CLARIFY THE TOTAL ACREAGE ON THE
18:25:54 SUBJECT SITE AND FOURTH REVISION IS THE TOTAL SQUARE
18:25:57 FOOTAGE FOR PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
18:25:58 WHOLE.
18:25:59 BASED ON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING
18:26:01 COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE
18:26:04 CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:26:07 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR
18:26:07 ANY QUESTIONS.
18:26:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. COLLINS?
18:26:11 NO?
18:26:13 MR. ZAIN HUSSEIN.
18:26:15 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN,
18:26:18 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, CASE REZ-21-46.
18:26:26 APPLICANT IS DAVID MECHANIK 401 AND 505 NORTH ROME AND
18:26:28 1517 WEST GRAY.
18:26:32 I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE PROPOSED WAIVERS.
18:26:34 SO THIS IS TWO PHASES.
18:26:37 PHASE ONE HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED FOR 311 UNITS AND
18:26:42 WAS APPROVED DURING REZ 13-66.
18:26:46 THIS WAS FOR THREE AND FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS, ALSO KNOWN
18:26:49 AS NOHO FLATS.
18:26:50 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
18:26:51 NOW WE HAVE NEW WAIVERS.
18:26:54 MOST OF THESE WAIVERS HAVE TO DO WITH EITHER
18:27:00 TRANSPORTATION OR NATURAL RESOURCES.
18:27:05 COMING TO AN AERIAL AND OVERHEAD VIEW SITE, YOU SEE THE
18:27:10 SITE OUTLINED HERE IN RED.
18:27:13 NOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING PHASE TWO, WHICH
18:27:21 CONTAINS AREA OF 1.16 ACRES OR 60,798 SQUARE FEET IN
18:27:22 SIZE.
18:27:28 THE PROPOSED BUILDING ITSELF HAS AN AREA OF 512,874
18:27:29 SQUARE FEET.
18:27:35 AND THE COMMERCIAL SPACE OUT OF THAT HAS 3863 SQUARE
18:27:36 FEET.
18:27:39 IF YOU SEE THE LOCATION, YOU WILL SEE NORTH ROME
18:27:40 RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH.
18:27:43 AND YOU WILL SEE WEST CARMEN HERE -- IF YOU LOOK
18:27:52 CLOSELY, WEST CARMEN HERE ALSO AT THE INTERSECTION.
18:27:56 SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN.
18:27:59 NOW AS WE ARE GOING TO LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN HERE.
18:28:00 TWO OPTIONS.
18:28:02 OPTION ONE AND OPTION TWO.
18:28:08 BOTH HAVE TO DUE WITH SOLID WASTE.
18:28:11 SOLID WASTE PREFERS IN-HOUSE -- SOLID WASTE PREFERS
18:28:13 OPTION ONE.
18:28:15 OPTION ONE IS PREFERRED BY SOLID WASTE BECAUSE BOTH
18:28:17 CONSISTENT FOR COLLECTION AND OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
18:28:19 AND EASEMENTS.
18:28:23 AND ALSO ALLOWS FOR SOLID WASTE OF VEHICLES MANEUVERING
18:28:26 INTERNAL TO THE SITE.
18:28:29 OPTION TWO -- AS YOU SEE SOLID WASTE IS ALSO CONSISTENT
18:28:32 BUT WILL REQUIRE THE SOLID WASTE VEHICLE TO BACK OUT ON
18:28:35 TO NORTH ROME GOING SOUTHBOUND.
18:28:46 YOU SEE THIS COMING OUT HERE.
18:28:50 THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR 76 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
18:28:51 UNITS.
18:28:57 ALSO FOR THE FOUR STOREFRONTS NONRESIDENTIAL USES FOR
18:29:01 SPACE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND RETAIL USES.
18:29:03 ALSO FOR TWO BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND
18:29:07 RETAIL USES ON THE GROUND FLOOR.
18:29:10 THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 55 FEET IN
18:29:13 HEIGHT OR ALSO FOUR STORIES.
18:29:16 VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE COMES OFF OF NORTH ROME
18:29:22 AVENUE RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH.
18:29:27 SHOWING YOU THE ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
18:29:32 YOU SEE THE NORTH ELEVATION, THE WEST ELEVATION, AND
18:29:39 ALSO YOU SEE THE SOUTH AND EAST.
18:29:44 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE WHAT IT
18:29:45 CURRENTLY IS.
18:29:47 A PARKING LOT.
18:29:55 A BUILDING HERE ON ROME AND GRAY.
18:29:57 ALSO GOING TO THE SITE, TOOK MORE PICTURES OF THE
18:29:59 WHOLE ENTIRE AREA ALSO.
18:30:04 NOHO FLATS, THE SIGN OF THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
18:30:05 THAT WAS ALREADY APPROVED.
18:30:08 NORTH OF THE SIGHT, MORE OF THE RESIDENTIAL
18:30:11 MULTIFAMILY.
18:30:14 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL
18:30:20 MULTIFAMILY ABOVE AND DUCKWEED CONVENIENCE STORE BELOW.
18:30:22 ALSO TO THE WEST OF THE SITE A COFFEE SHOP AND
18:30:29 RESTAURANT LOCATED RIGHT TO THE WEST.
18:30:31 MORE OF THE SITE.
18:30:33 RESIDENTIAL PARKING.
18:30:35 AND ALSO THE SITE ITSELF AND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE,
18:30:43 YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL PARKING RUNNING EAST TO WEST.
18:30:47 AND TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE ROME AND
18:30:54 FIG AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
18:30:56 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
18:31:00 THE APPLICATION AND FIND THE OVERALL REQUEST
18:31:03 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT.
18:31:06 FOUND INCONSISTENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION AND NATURAL
18:31:06 RESOURCES.
18:31:09 MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED
18:31:12 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AND AS
18:31:15 STATED ON THE REVISION SHEET, IF APPROVED BY COUNCIL.
18:31:16 THANK YOU FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:31:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:31:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: ZAIN, GO BACK TO THE SOLID WASTE
18:31:23 SITUATION.
18:31:27 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: ALL RIGHT.
18:31:31 AS YOU WILL SEE THE SOLID WASTE OPTION ONE.
18:31:34 AND OPTION TWO.
18:31:42 IN AND OUT.
18:31:44 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SOLID WASTE LIKES THE FIRST OPTION
18:31:48 BECAUSE BACKING OUT ON THE STREET, THAT BIG TRUCK --
18:31:49 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: CORRECT.
18:31:52 SOLID WASTE PREFERS OPTION ONE AND TWO DUE TO THAT BACK
18:31:54 OUT, CORRECT.
18:31:56 >>ORLANDO GUDES: BECAUSE THINK CAN'T SEE.
18:31:57 ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, ZAIN.
18:31:58 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU.
18:32:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
18:32:01 NO?
18:32:02 THANK YOU, SIR.
18:32:12 MR. MECHANIK.
18:32:15 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:32:16 MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK.
18:32:21 I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, AND I HAVE WITH ME
18:32:26 THIS EVENING MY CLIENT ANTHONY EVERETT WHO WILL PRESENT
18:32:33 THE PROJECT TO YOU AND DISCUSS THE WAIVERS THAT WE HAVE
18:32:34 REQUESTED.
18:32:38 I WOULD JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THIS IS AN
18:32:42 EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING PROJECT THAT WAS APPROVED IN
18:32:43 2013.
18:32:56 WE ARE ONLY ADDING 76 MULTIFAMILY UNITS AND 760 SQUARE
18:33:01 FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE THAT CAN BE USED AS OFFICE OR
18:33:04 RETAIL AND WOULD POTENTIALLY INVOLVE STOREFRONT
18:33:09 RESIDENTIAL, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR CONNECTION BETWEEN
18:33:13 UPPER RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND A COMMERCIAL SPACE BELOW.
18:33:17 AND WITH THAT, I WILL ASK MR. EVERETT TO COME FORWARD
18:33:25 AND DESCRIBE THE PROJECT.
18:33:27 >> WE WILL SEE IF WE CAN GET THE PRESENTATION UP FOR
18:33:31 ME.
18:33:32 HERE WE GO.
18:33:37 ANTHONY EVERETT, 5000 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD.
18:33:38 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:33:41 DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR RANGE WATER REAL ESTATE IN
18:33:47 CENTRAL FLORIDA AND REPRESENT IVESCO THAT OWNS ITS NOHO
18:33:49 FLATS NEXT DOOR.
18:33:54 ORIGINALLY WERE GOING TO PROPOSE 1100 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
18:33:58 AND MEETING WITH NEIGHBORS AND MEMBERS AND STAKEHOLDERS
18:34:00 IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HYDE PARK ASSOCIATION, WE
18:34:03 REALIZED HOW IMPORTANT THE MIXED USE WAS TO EVERYBODY
18:34:04 IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:34:08 SO WE WENT BACK, REDESIGNED THE PROJECT AND MAXED OUT
18:34:12 THE GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE WITH THE PARKING THAT
18:34:16 WE COULD USE OR GET INTO THE PROJECT WITHOUT ASKING FOR
18:34:18 A WAIVER ON THE PARKING CODE.
18:34:21 THE 3863 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL IS REALLY THE MAX WE
18:34:22 COULD GET.
18:34:25 AND THAT IS WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TONIGHT WITH THE 76
18:34:26 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
18:34:30 SO IF WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:34:32 THIS IS REALLY KNOWN AS KINDS OF THE HOLE IN THE
18:34:33 DOUGHNUT FOR A LOT OF FOLKS.
18:34:36 I DON'T KNOW IF YOU SEE IN THE MIDDLE OF -- OF ALL
18:34:37 THOSE BLOCKS.
18:34:40 WE DEVELOPED FOUR AND A HALF BLOCKS AROUND THIS
18:34:41 WAREHOUSE.
18:34:45 AND SO THE HOLE IN THE DOUGHNUT IS PROPERTY 505 NORTH
18:34:46 ROME AVENUE.
18:34:48 IF WE CAN PLEASE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.
18:34:51 WE CAME INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD 12 YEARS AGO.
18:34:53 YOU KNOW, THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WAS IN DECLINE.
18:34:55 WE HAD JUST COME OUT OF THE GREAT RECESSION.
18:34:57 A LOT OF CRIME IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:34:58 THERE WAS NO LIGHTING ON THE STREET.
18:35:02 I MEAN, PEOPLE WERE SCARED TO GO OUT AT NIGHT.
18:35:05 PEOPLE WERE AFRAID TO BE OUT ON THE STREET, SOMETIMES
18:35:06 DURING THE DAY.
18:35:09 WE CAME IN AND TRIED TO CREATE WHAT I CALL NEIGHBORHOOD
18:35:12 BUILDING TYPE OF PHILOSOPHY AND TRIED TO CREATE A SENSE
18:35:15 OF STREETSCAPE AND CAME UP WITH A TEMPLATE STREETSCAPE
18:35:18 IN THE FIRST PHASE THAT WE DID THAT WE TRY TO EMULATE
18:35:21 AND TRY TO GET OTHERS TO EMULATE THROUGHOUT THE
18:35:22 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:35:25 WE MET WITH OUR NEIGHBORS AND TRIED TO DEVELOPMENT
18:35:27 GREAT RELATIONSHIPS WITH OUR NEIGHBORS TO LISTEN TO
18:35:30 WHAT THEY WANTED US TO DO AND WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
18:35:31 REALLY NEEDED.
18:35:34 PHASE ONE OF NOHO FLATS WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE IN THE
18:35:38 CENTER PICTURE, THEY ASKED US TO CREATE A PUBLIC PARK
18:35:39 WHICH WE DID.
18:35:42 AND THAT PUBLIC PARK IS HERE TODAY AND MAINTAINED BY
18:35:45 THE NOHO FLATS PROPERTY AND OPENED TO THE PUBLIC AND
18:35:49 PRIVATELY OWNED AND HAS AN EASEMENT OVER IT AND CANNOT
18:35:53 USE FOR ANYTHING BUT A PUBLIC PARK GOING FORWARD.
18:35:56 WE CAME IN AND PUT ALL THE OVERHEAD POWER LINES
18:35:56 UNDERGROUND.
18:36:03 WE MADE A LOT OF IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STORMWATER SYSTEM.
18:36:06 THE POTABLE WATER SYSTEM BECAUSE A LOT OF LINES
18:36:08 COLLAPSING IN THE AREA.
18:36:09 THERE WAS FLOODING IN THE AREA.
18:36:14 WE DID COME IN AND DO STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND PUT
18:36:17 IN THE STREET LIGHTING THAT YOU SEE THE BUILDINGS OVER
18:36:17 THERE.
18:36:19 ALL THE STREET LIGHTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT YOU SEE
18:36:22 OFTEN THE POST IS ACTUALLY PRIVATELY OWNED AND
18:36:25 MAINTAINED AND OPERATED AND THE ELECTRICITY IS PAID FOR
18:36:29 BY THE COMMUNITY WHICH THE -- YOU KNOW, THE LIGHTING
18:36:30 IS.
18:36:32 IF YOU CAN PLEASE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.
18:36:34 AGAIN, WE WERE TRYING TO CREATE A MORE
18:36:37 PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY AND MORE SECURE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:36:40 AGAIN WE FIGURED IF WE CAN ACTIVATE THE STREET, CREATE
18:36:43 MORE PEDESTRIAN USE, CREATE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT WITH
18:36:46 STREET LIGHTING AND WHATNOT, WE COULD IMPROVE THE
18:36:46 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:36:49 WE CAME IN, PUT IN BIKE RACKS.
18:36:54 PUBLIC BENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLES, AND GREAT
18:36:57 LANDSCAPING AND ALSO, YOU KNOW, DOG MAINTENANCE
18:37:01 STATIONS SO WHEN PEOPLE ARE OUT WALKING THEIR DOGS.
18:37:04 WE MAINTAIN THEM PRIVATELY AND TRYING TO CREATE A MORE
18:37:06 PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:37:11 WE ALSO DID -- ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF OUR UNITS WHICH I
18:37:13 HAVEN'T SEEN MUCH OF THIS DONE IN TAMPA AND I HAVE SEEN
18:37:18 OTHER MARKETS, FRONT PORCHES TO ALLOW OUR RESIDENTS TO
18:37:19 HAVE ACCESS TO THE STREETS.
18:37:21 NEW URBAN THINKING THAT EVERYBODY IS TRYING TO DO BUT
18:37:25 THIS IS 12, 13 YEARS AGO AND HELPED TO ACTIVATE THE
18:37:29 STREET ESPECIALLY WHEN WE HAVE STREET LIGHTING IN.
18:37:33 I AM PROUD WITH EN WITH GO TO WILLOWS AND ROME AND FIG
18:37:36 AND SIGH PEOPLE WALKING AROUND, WALKING THEIR DOGS.
18:37:39 A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FEEL THAN 12 YEARS AGO.
18:37:41 IF WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:37:47 WE ALSO PUT IN ABOUT 200 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES IN
18:37:49 THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE TRIED TO GIVE BACK DOING THOSE
18:37:51 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
18:37:53 IF THIS PROJECT IS APPROVED, WE PLAN TO DO THIS
18:37:56 SIGNATURE CORNER AT THE CORNER OF ROME AND CARMEN.
18:37:59 AND SORT OF LIKE A SMALL LITTLE PUBLIC PARK.
18:38:03 WE PLAN TO PROGRAM IT WITH SEASONAL, YOU KNOW, FLOWERS
18:38:04 AND WHAT NOT.
18:38:06 WE HAVE BENCHES THERE WHERE PEOPLE CAN GATHER.
18:38:09 THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A NICE -- YOU KNOW, NICE ACCENT FOR
18:38:10 THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:38:12 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:38:16 SO, AGAIN, THE FIRST PHASE WAS NOHO FLATS THAT ZAIN
18:38:17 MENTIONED EARLIER.
18:38:23 AND WE DID -- NEXT, THE NEXT SLIDE, VIENNA SQUARE
18:38:25 ACROSS THE STREET FOUR STORIES WITH A CENTRAL WRAPPED
18:38:27 PARKING GARAGE.
18:38:29 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:38:30 THE LAST PROJECTS WATT THE GRAY.
18:38:33 WITH THE GRAY, WE KEPT GETTING THESE REQUESTS FOR THE
18:38:36 NEIGHBOR TO PLEASE PUT IN A MIXED USE.
18:38:40 AT THIS TIME, I WAS SUSPECT OF PUTTING IN A MIXED USE
18:38:43 BECAUSE MUCH OF THE RETAIL IN THE AREA -- EXCEPT FOR
18:38:46 SOME OF IT WAS COMING TO LIFE, BUT WE WERE KIND INFORM
18:38:50 THAT TRANSITIONAL AREA AND FELT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD
18:38:52 FINALLY TURNED A CORNER WHERE WE CAN SUPPORT THE
18:38:54 RETAIL.
18:38:59 AND PUT IN THE CONVENIENCE STORE AND THE DUCKWEED URBAN
18:39:02 GROCERY AND THEY ARE DOING GREAT AND A NICE ADDITION TO
18:39:04 THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT IS GREAT THAT WE GOT THAT PUSH
18:39:07 TO DO THAT USE, BECAUSE IT IS WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
18:39:09 REALLY NEEDED.
18:39:11 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:39:14 PHASE TWO IS ACTUALLY COMPRISED OF TWO SEPARATE LITTLE
18:39:16 PARCELS.
18:39:19 THE MAIN PARCEL WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WHERE WE PLAN TO
18:39:19 DO THE BUILDING.
18:39:23 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR FOUR
18:39:26 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND SIX GARAGES AND PROPOSING TO
18:39:28 ELIMINATE THOSE UNITS AND DO 18 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
18:39:29 THERE.
18:39:32 I WILL COME BACK TO THAT LATER, BUT JUST WANTED TO CALL
18:39:35 THAT OUT SO YOU WILL UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE
18:39:38 EXPLAIN ONE OF THE WAIVERS, WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR THAT.
18:39:42 IF WE CAN PLEASE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:39:44 THIS IS JUST AN ELEVATION ON ROME.
18:39:45 I WILL COME BACK TO THIS.
18:39:48 SO WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
18:39:50 OUR SITE PLAN.
18:39:51 THIS IS THE GARAGE LEVEL.
18:39:55 AND THE RESIDENTS ACTUALLY ENTER THROUGH THE GATES OFF
18:39:56 OF CARMEN TO THE RIGHT.
18:39:59 THE RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE IS TO THE RIGHTS
18:40:00 OF THE GARAGE.
18:40:04 AND THEN THE COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE IS OFF OF ROME.
18:40:07 AND SO ONLY THE COMMERCIAL WILL ACCESS ON AND OFF OF
18:40:07 ROAM.
18:40:09 AND THEY HAVE THEIR OWN SEPARATE PARKING.
18:40:12 WE FOUND ON THESE PROJECTS THAT OFTENTIMES WHEN WE DO
18:40:15 MIX THE PARKING THAT THE RESIDENTS PARK NOTICE
18:40:17 COMMERCIAL AREA AND COMMERCIAL PARK IN THE RESIDENTIAL
18:40:19 AREA AND NOT ENOUGH PARKING FOR EVERYBODY.
18:40:21 SO WE DO SEPARATE THE PARKING.
18:40:27 AND THEN THIS DOES SHOW THE OPTION WITH THE TRASH
18:40:29 COMPACTOR ON ROME.
18:40:32 AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS FOR
18:40:34 THE TRASH COMPACTOR.
18:40:37 AND, OF COURSE, OUR RESIDENT WILL PREFER NOT TO HAVE IT
18:40:40 IN OUR GREEN SPACE AND SERVICED FROM ROME.
18:40:42 I KNOW SOLID WASTE WILL PREFER TO HAVE IT.
18:40:46 BUT WE DO HAVE IT -- IF WE ARE ALLOWED TO PUT IT ON
18:40:49 ROME, WE WILL HAVE THE TRUCK COMPLETELY OFF THE STREET
18:40:54 TO SERVICE THE COMPACTOR AND BACK TO ROME.
18:40:55 I UNDERSTAND THAT CONCERN.
18:40:58 BUT FOR THE USE OF THE GREEN SPACE, A LOT BETTER TO NOT
18:41:00 HAVE THE COMPACTOR.
18:41:02 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:41:04 THIS IS THE DECK ABOVE THE PARKING.
18:41:06 76 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AS I SAID.
18:41:11 AROUND A LANDSCAPE PARKING -- LANDSCAPED COURTYARD, AND
18:41:13 THE LARGE SQUARE TO THE RIGHT IS ACTUALLY A NEW FITNESS
18:41:16 CENTER WILL SERVICE BOTH PHASES.
18:41:19 WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:41:22 A COLOR RENDERING WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE UP THERE.
18:41:26 A LOT OF LANDSCAPE PLANNERS, COMMERCIAL KITCHEN,
18:41:31 DIFFERENT SEATING AREAS WITH FIRE TABLES AND SOFAS AND
18:41:34 TABLES WHERE PEOPLE CAN GATHER AND, OF COURSE, THE NEW
18:41:36 FITNESS CENTER TO THE RIGHT.
18:41:36 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:41:40 A RENDERING OF WHAT THE FITNESS CENTER WILL LOOK LIKE.
18:41:43 IF YOU CAN IMAGINE WORKING OUT AND LOOKING TO THE
18:41:45 GARDEN TO THE LEFT AND RIGHT, IT WILL BE A REALLY
18:41:47 FANTASTIC FEEL HERE.
18:41:48 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:41:51 BY THE WAY, WE WILL REPURPOSE THE OLD FITNESS CENTER IN
18:41:54 PHASE ONE WITH SOME SORT OF USE.
18:41:57 IT WILL EITHER BE GOING WITH DIFFERENT PROGRAMS FOR THE
18:42:01 RESIDENTS, AND ALSO A CROSS FIT GYM.
18:42:04 A LOT OF SPACE TO RETURN AND NOT SURE WHAT MANAGEMENT
18:42:10 WILL DO WITH THAT, BUT PILATES, YOGA, SEMINARS, A LOT
18:42:12 OF DIFFERENT THINGS CAN GO THERE.
18:42:14 I WOULD LIKE TO EXPLAIN WAIVER REQUEST.
18:42:17 THE FIRST WAIVER REQUEST FROM NATURAL RESOURCES IS
18:42:19 WAIVER OF THE GREEN SPACE, TRYING TO REDUCE FROM THE
18:42:22 350 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
18:42:25 THIS IS A REQUIREMENT THAT YOU SEE OUT IN THE SUBURBS.
18:42:29 NOT AN URBAN -- NO URBAN CODE ANYWHERE.
18:42:33 IN FACT PASCO COUNTY IS AT 435 A UNIT, WHICH IS PRETTY
18:42:34 EXCESSIVE OUT THERE.
18:42:38 BUT ANYWAY, PHASE ONE WAS GRANTED A WAIVER DOWN TO 108
18:42:40 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
18:42:43 WE CAN PROVIDE BECAUSE OF THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
18:42:46 GRAY STREET, WE CAN MAKE A GREEN SPACE AREA THAT IS
18:42:47 FAIRLY LARGE.
18:42:51 THE WAIVER REQUEST HERE IS 7752 SQUARE FEET WHICH
18:42:54 BRINGS US DOWN TO 248 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
18:42:56 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:42:57 THE SECOND ONE IS FOR LOADING.
18:43:00 WE ARE DOESN'T RELY DOING LOADING THE NESTED AREA OF
18:43:01 THE PARKING.
18:43:02 BEHIND THE BUILDING.
18:43:04 SO THE TRUCKS COME IN OFF THE STREET.
18:43:06 BUT THROUGH THE GATES.
18:43:08 AND WE LOAD WITHIN EACH OF THE BLOCKS.
18:43:13 WE DIDN'T NEED TO LOAD ON THE STREET IN PHASE ONE.
18:43:16 PROPOSE PHASE TWO IN THE PARKING AREA TO THE REAR.
18:43:18 THAT IS WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER OF THE LOADING
18:43:19 AREA.
18:43:24 KEEP IN MIND MOST OF OUR MOVE-INS, 90% OF THEM ARE WITH
18:43:27 BOX TRUCKS AND EVEN PEOPLE USING THEIR OWN PICK-UPS AND
18:43:28 THINGS LIKE THAT.
18:43:31 WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF BIG MOVING TRUCKS THAT COME INTO
18:43:32 OUR PROJECTS.
18:43:38 THE WAIVER OF THE EIGHT-FOOT BU A BUFFER GOES TO THE
18:43:40 SOUTHEAST CORNER.
18:43:42 PICTURE ON THE LOWER LEFT-HAND SIDE THE CONDITION THAT
18:43:43 WE HAVE RIGHT NOW.
18:43:46 TO MEET THAT BUFFER REQUIREMENT, I WOULD HAVE TO MOVE
18:43:50 THE FENCING BACK FOUR TO SIX FEET ON ONE SIDE AND FOUR
18:43:54 FEET ON ANOTHER SIDE AND LOSE HALF OF THE 18 SPACES
18:43:56 THAT WE CAN GET BY KEEPING THE FENCING THE SAME SPOT.
18:44:02 SO WE CAN'T GET THE FULL EIGHT-FOOT BUFFER AND THAT IS
18:44:04 WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR THE WAIVER AND THIS IS THE
18:44:06 EXISTING CONDITION TODAY AND WILL STAY EXACTLY THE
18:44:07 SAME.
18:44:11 THE LAST WAIVER NOR THE 50% TREE REQUIREMENT.
18:44:12 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:44:14 THE TREES, UNFORTUNATELY, ON THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ARE
18:44:18 PRETTY MUCH LOCATED RIGHT WHERE WE HAVE TO PUT THE
18:44:20 BUILDING IN ORDER TO MAKE THE PROJECT WORK AND PARKING
18:44:21 AREAS.
18:44:24 WE ARE ASKING -- AND YOU CAN'T REALLY DO THIS, BUT I
18:44:28 WOULD LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER LOOKING AT THE FACT THAT IF
18:44:31 YOU PUT PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO TOGETHER, WE HAVE A
18:44:36 TOTAL OF 218 TREES AND RETAINING 196 OR SO OF THOSE
18:44:37 TREES.
18:44:43 SO THE RETAINAGE IS 85% TO 90% IF YOU LOOK AT IT ON
18:44:44 AGGREGATE.
18:44:47 PHASE TWO SITE, WE HAVE TO REMOVE ALL THE TREES TO MAKE
18:44:48 THE PROJECT WORK.
18:44:51 WE ARE WILLING TO COMMIT TONIGHT AND NOT PART OF THE
18:44:53 COATED, RELOCATING TREES.
18:44:57 WE CAN RELOCATE TREE -- BUT WE ARE ABLE TO COMMIT
18:45:03 TONIGHT TO BE ABLE TO REINSTALL DOUBLE THE CALIBER OF
18:45:04 OAK TREES.
18:45:07 IF WE TAKE OUT 50 INCHES, WE WILL PUT IN 100 INCHES OF
18:45:12 OAK TREES AND UPSIDE THOSE OAK MYSTERIES UP TO 8-INCH
18:45:13 TREES.
18:45:14 THE BIGGEST ONES WE CAN GET.
18:45:15 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:45:18 THIS IS WHAT THE PROJECT WILL LOOK LIKE WITH THE
18:45:19 RESIDENTIAL UP ABOVE.
18:45:24 THE GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL WITH THE 8-INCH OAKS AROUND
18:45:25 GOING DOWN ROME AVENUE.
18:45:27 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:45:30 THIS IS LOOKING DOWN CARMEN WITH THAT SIGNATURE CORNER.
18:45:33 THE CORNER OF CARMEN AND ROME.
18:45:36 OAK TREE GOING DOWN CARMEN.
18:45:37 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
18:45:39 AND IN CONCLUSION -- ACTUALLY A COUPLE OF CLEANUP
18:45:41 THINGS.
18:45:43 I WILL COME BACK TO THIS.
18:45:45 CONCLUSION WE ASK YOU PLEASE FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
18:45:47 WE THINK IT IS A GREAT PROJECT.
18:45:50 WE FEEL LIKE WE HAVE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION ALL THE
18:45:51 COMMENTS THAT OUR NEIGHBORS HAVE GIVEN US.
18:45:56 REDESIGNED BASED ON THEIR INPUT AND I THINK WE HAVE A
18:45:58 PROJECT THAT WE CAN ALL BE PROUD OF IF WE CAN GET IT
18:46:00 UNDER THE GROUND.
18:46:06 CLEANUP I WANT -- A SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN OUR PLANS AND
18:46:10 OUR ARCHITECT CORRECTLY NOTED WAS DIVIDED IN FOUR
18:46:10 SPACES.
18:46:12 THAT IS NOT TRUE.
18:46:14 WE ARE TRYING TO BUILD IT AS ONE GIANT SPACE.
18:46:18 AS WE LEASE IT, DIVIDE IT BASED ON WHAT THE MARKET
18:46:19 TELLS US.
18:46:23 SO WE NEED TO TRY TO REMOVE THAT FROM -- FROM THE PLAN,
18:46:26 IF APPROVED, BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, WE WOULD
18:46:29 LIKE TO REMOVE THAT HAVE THE PLAN AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
18:46:32 IT WILL LEASE AND BUILD IT OUT WITH DIRT FLOORS AND AS
18:46:36 WE LEASE THEM, BUILD IT OUT AS THE TENANT NEEDS.
18:46:38 I FORGET IN MY PRESENTATION THAT WE ARE PLANNING TO
18:46:42 INSTALL TEN EV CHARGERS IN THE PROJECT, SOMETHING THAT
18:46:46 IS IMPORTANT TO US AND WE -- LAUGH -- AND WE -- WE DO
18:46:51 THIS ON EVERY PROJECT AND COMMITTING TO DO TEN EV -- EV
18:46:53 CHARGERS ON THIS PROJECT.
18:46:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:46:59 >> VERY QUICKLY -- DAVID MECHANIK AGAIN.
18:47:04 JUST TO CLARIFY, THE TWO OPTIONS ON THE SOLID WASTE, WE
18:47:09 ARE ASKING COUNCIL'S APPROVAL TO APPROVE BOTH OPTIONS.
18:47:14 OPTION 2 WOULD ONLY BE UTILIZED IF COUNCIL SUBSEQUENTLY
18:47:17 AGREES TO A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENT IN THE
18:47:18 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
18:47:22 SO WE WOULD JUST ASK THAT COUNCIL APPROVE BOTH OPTIONS
18:47:27 AND THEN IN THE FUTURE, IF COUNCIL APPROVES THE
18:47:31 RELEASE OF EASEMENT, WE WILL IMPLEMENT OPTION TWO.
18:47:34 AND ALSO JUST FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT
18:47:36 OUT, I SEE I AM DONE.
18:47:39 JUST ONE SENTENCE HERE.
18:47:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TEN MORE SECONDS.
18:47:44 >> TWO LETTERS OF SUPPORT IN THE RECORD.
18:47:46 AND IT IS ALREADY IN THE COUNCIL RECORD.
18:47:50 ONE IS FROM THE NORTH HYDE PARK ALLIANCE.
18:47:54 THE OTHER FROM BRANDT PETERSON, WHO IS A PROPERTY OWNER
18:47:55 IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:47:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
18:48:00 >> RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
18:48:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.
18:48:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU ARE ASKING US TO GO AHEAD AND
18:48:10 ACCEPT BOTH.
18:48:11 >> YES, SIR.
18:48:13 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WITH HOPES THAT THIS EASEMENT MIGHT
18:48:14 WORK IN YOUR FAVOR.
18:48:16 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
18:48:18 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
18:48:23 PLANS -- I AM TALKING SQUARE FOOTAGE, RIGHT-OF-WAYS,
18:48:23 SETBACKS.
18:48:26 IS IT -- IS THAT BIG OF A DIFFERENCE?
18:48:30 I WOULD HATE TO SEE US SAY, OKAY, SURE, WE WILL APPROVE
18:48:33 BOTH, AND A YEAR DOWN THE LINE, THAT EASEMENT COMES
18:48:36 THROUGH AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOUR DESIGNS ARE -- ARE
18:48:38 EXORBITANT CHANGES.
18:48:39 >> I CAN ANSWER THAT.
18:48:42 ACTUALLY THE VACATING OF A COUPLE OF EASEMENTS THAT ARE
18:48:43 IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT WILL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF
18:48:45 THAT -- THAT DUMPSTER.
18:48:48 SO THERE IS A WATER LINE THAT NEEDS TO BE VACATED,
18:48:49 REMOVED.
18:48:51 AND THE CITY HAS APPROVED THAT.
18:48:54 A SANITARY SEWER LINE WITH A NEW EASEMENT OVER IT AND A
18:48:57 STORMWATER LINE THAT NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED.
18:49:01 UPON DOING THAT, CITY STAFF HAS AGREED TO RELEASE THE
18:49:04 EASEMENT THAT WOULD -- THAT IS PREVENTING US TO PUT THE
18:49:07 COMPACTOR ON THE ROME AVENUE SIDE.
18:49:11 SO IT IS REALLY A QUESTION OF AESTHETICS FROM, YOU
18:49:14 KNOW, WHERE WE THINK IT IS BETTER TO HAVE THAT SURFACE
18:49:17 AREA AND WE FEEL LIKE WE CAN SCREEN IT FROM ROME WITH
18:49:20 VERY NICE BIG GATES AND HAVE A SERVICE AREA THERE.
18:49:23 AND IT IS A MUCH EASIER ACCESS THAN THE TRUCKS HAVING
18:49:26 TO COME IN AND, YOU KNOW, MANEUVER THROUGH THE WHOLE
18:49:28 PARKING AREA.
18:49:32 SO THE SOUTHWEST DETERMINES ONE OPTION IS ONE THEY WILL
18:49:35 APPROVE AND ONE THEY WILL NOT APPROVE IN PERMITTING AND
18:49:37 GO WITH WHATEVER OPTION THEY WANT.
18:49:40 I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM SOLID WASTE THEY HAD A
18:49:41 PREFERENCE.
18:49:44 THEY HAD APPROVED BOTH AS FAR AS I KNEW IF IT IS
18:49:47 APPROVED TONIGHT TO GIVE US OVER AT OPTION.
18:49:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW NOT AN
18:49:52 ADDITIONAL 10,000 SQUARE FOOT BEING BUILT OR ANYTHING
18:49:53 LIKE THAT.
18:49:57 >> OH, NO, NO, NO.WOULD NOT ALLOW ANYTHING OVER AND
18:50:02 ABOVE WHAT IS APPROVED BUT JUST THE LOCATION.
18:50:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
18:50:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE HERE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO
18:50:09 WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 5?
18:50:13 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
18:50:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
18:50:17 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
18:50:19 >> NATHAN HAGAN AGAIN.
18:50:22 I LIVE WITHIN THE VISUAL OVERLAY OF THIS ONE.
18:50:26 THIS IS THE FIRST TIME SAYING YES, LITERALLY MY BACK
18:50:27 YARD ABOUT THE PROJECT.
18:50:32 I WANT TO POINT OUT THIS IS THE BEST BIKE STRUCTURE IN
18:50:36 THE CITY OF TAMPA IS THE ROAD THAT THE NOHO FLATS WITH
18:50:37 THE GREEN SPINE.
18:50:41 AND WITH THE WEST RIVER -- RIVERWALK EXTENSION WHICH I
18:50:43 KNOW DID NOT PREDATE THE PLANNING FOR THIS.
18:50:45 BUT A LOT OF PARKING HERE.
18:50:49 ON THE BEST BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE CITY.
18:50:50 WE CAN THINK ABOUT THAT.
18:50:54 A LOT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT COULD GO IN THERE THAT
18:50:58 OUR CODE DOES NOT INCENTIVIZE PROPERLY HERE BUT A LOT
18:51:00 OF TRADE-OFFS AND PUTTING CARS ABOVE PEOPLE IN THIS
18:51:02 CASE.
18:51:05 AND I ALSO WANT TO COMMEND THEM FOR THE MIXED USE.
18:51:08 I THINK THAT IS VERY CRITICAL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS
18:51:10 SOMEONE THAT LIVES THERE.
18:51:12 THE PIZZA SHOP IS A HUGE ACCESS.
18:51:17 WILLOW'S HAS BEEN INCREDIBLE AND SO HAS ITS -- BEEN
18:51:21 GREAT TO HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:51:24 >> WHERE WERE YOU 12 YEARS AGO WHEN I WAS TRYING TO GET
18:51:25 PARKING WAIVERS.
18:51:27 [LAUGHTER]
18:51:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SANTORO'S PIZZA IS LIFE CHANGING.
18:51:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HAVE YOU EVER HAD IT?
18:51:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
18:51:38 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IT WILL BE.
18:51:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU.
18:51:40 ANYBODY ELSE?
18:51:42 HAVE ANY REBUTTAL.
18:51:44 >> YES, SIR, DAVID MECHANIK, VERY BRIEFLY.
18:51:47 WE WILL ASK IF COUNCIL IS INCLINED TO APPROVE THIS,
18:51:50 THAT YOU ALLOW US TO REMOVE THE SCRIVENER'S ERROR SO
18:51:54 THAT THE COMMERCIAL SPACE IS NOT SPECIFICALLY LIMITED
18:51:56 TO FOUR UNITS.
18:51:58 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE REMAINS THE SAME.
18:52:00 WE ARE NOT ENLARGING THAT.
18:52:04 AND THE OTHER IS WE WILL RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU
18:52:09 ALLOW BOTH OPTIONS FOR THE TRASH COMPACTOR.
18:52:12 AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
18:52:14 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY FINAL QUESTIONS BEFORE WE
18:52:15 CLOSE?
18:52:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:52:18 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:52:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR.
18:52:23 COUNCILMAN GUDES, TAKE ITEM NUMBER 5?
18:52:26 MR. CHAIRMAN.
18:52:30 FILE NO. REZ-21-46.
18:52:32 ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
18:52:35 CONSIDERATION, ZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY
18:52:40 OF 401 AND 505 NORTH ROME AVENUE AND 1517 WEST GRAY
18:52:43 STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
18:52:48 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICTS PD PLANNED
18:52:52 DEVELOPMENT, IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL TO PD, PLANNED
18:52:56 DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY STOREFRONT
18:52:58 RESIDENTIAL WITH BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND
18:52:59 RETAIL SALES.
18:53:01 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:53:03 ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND REASONINGS OF THE PLANNING
18:53:06 COMMISSION AND STAFF REPORT FOR REZONING ACHIEVES
18:53:12 HOUSING 1.3.1 AND 1.3.3 AS IT ACCOMMODATES THE PLANNED
18:53:15 LEVELS OF HOUSEHOLD GROWTH WITH INCREASE OF DENSITY
18:53:18 WITNESS INCLUSION OF NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL SPACE.
18:53:23 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
18:53:25 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT AND APPROPRIATE AND LOCATION,
18:53:27 CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING
18:53:31 NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:53:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DON'T FORGET THE SUBSTITUTED
18:53:34 REVISION.
18:53:37 >>ORLANDO GUDES: WITH THE SUBSTITUTION REVISION SHEET.
18:53:41 DO WE NEED TO -- THE SCRIVENER'S ERROR.
18:53:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AND SOLID WASTE.
18:53:50 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SOLID WASTE AND THE SCRIVENER'S.
18:53:51 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
18:53:53 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
18:53:55 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:53:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:53:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:53:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:54:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:54:04 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY SECOND READING AND
18:54:08 ADOPTION MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
18:54:08 >> THANK YOU.
18:54:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH ITEM NUMBER 7.
18:54:17 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
18:54:20 ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:54:24 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 7, CASE REZ-21-99.
18:54:35 IN BEING HEARD FOR FIRST READING FOR 5242 AND 5250
18:54:40 EAST BROADWAY FROM PD TO PD RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND
18:54:43 STRIP SHOPPING CENTER WITH ALL CI USES.
18:54:45 TURN IT OVER TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:54:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS.
18:54:48 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH OUR PLANNING
18:54:48 COMMISSION STAFF.
18:54:51 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:54:54 THE NEXT CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS.
18:54:57 OAK PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY
18:55:00 LOCATED JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:55:06 THE TERMINUS OF HART ROUTE 8 IS 50TH STREET WHICH IS .4
18:55:08 MILES FROM THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:55:11 CONNECTS THE SUBJECT SITE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND TOWN
18:55:12 CENTER.
18:55:16 SITE WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE D.
18:55:18 AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
18:55:19 PROPERTIES.
18:55:21 YOU WILL SEE BROADWAY IS DEVELOPED PREDOMINANTLY
18:55:23 NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
18:55:27 AS YOU MOVE NORTH ALONG NORTH 54TH STREET, AND JUST
18:55:30 NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU GET INTO MORE OF RESIDENTIAL
18:55:32 AREA.
18:55:38 ALSO RESIDENTS WEST AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:55:42 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:55:45 THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED UNDER THE
18:55:49 RESULT 20 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:55:52 THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO EAST
18:55:55 BROADWAY AVENUE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE TU FUTURE LAND
18:55:55 USE.
18:56:01 THE TU-24 DESIGNATION IS THE PREDOMINANT LAND USE
18:56:05 CATEGORY ALONG THE PORTION OF EAST BROADWAY AVENUE AND
18:56:10 NORTH OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL-20.
18:56:12 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND
18:56:14 FOUND CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES IN THE
18:56:16 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:56:20 THE PORTION OF SUBJECT SITE TU-24 FUTURE LAND USE
18:56:21 DESIGNATION.
18:56:26 THIS DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR WIDE ARRAY OF USES OF A
18:56:29 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT DOES NOT ADEQUATELY MITIGATE
18:56:32 THE INTENSE USE ALLOW THE UNDER THIS PROPERTY.
18:56:35 ITS PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU USE CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN
18:56:37 THIS DESIGNATION AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CONSISTENCY
18:56:42 MATRIX OF SECTION 27-21 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
18:56:45 AND THIS DRIVE THROUGH WILL NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE
18:56:46 SURROUNDING USES.
18:56:49 THE PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE DESIGNATED
18:56:53 RESIDENTIAL-20, NEIGHBORHOOD 20 USES -- SORRY,
18:56:56 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES AND 104 DWELLING UNITS,
18:56:59 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES CAN BE CONSIDERED AND 20
18:57:03 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE COMMERCIAL LOCATION
18:57:05 CRITERIA.
18:57:08 WHILE THE SITE IS NOT SUBJECT TO COMMERCIAL CRITERIA
18:57:13 AND APPROVED UNDER AN EXISTING ZONING, IT DOES MEET THE
18:57:17 CRITERIA SINCE THE SITE HAS ACCESS TO A COLLECTOR
18:57:19 ROADWAY OR HIGHER.
18:57:22 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY
18:57:25 OF HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AN ENCOURAGES
18:57:28 PROVIDING HOUSING FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT OR
18:57:31 UNDERUTILIZED SITES.
18:57:35 PROPOSED PD WILL PROVIDE MORE HOUSING TO SERVE TAMPA'S
18:57:36 PROJECTED POPULATION.
18:57:40 IT WILL ALSO UTILIZE A VACANT SITE AND PROVIDE GOODS
18:57:42 AND SERVICES FOR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:57:45 LASTLY, THE PD IS PROPOSING INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN
18:57:50 CONNECTIONS TO THE MULTIFAMILY USES, TO THE COMMERCIAL
18:57:53 USES PROPOSED ALONG EAST BROADWAY AVENUE WHICH IS
18:57:55 CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY DIRECTIONS OF THE
18:57:57 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:58:00 THE PD IS ALSO PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE
18:58:03 FRONT DOOR OF THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS TO I BELIEVE
18:58:07 TERM PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
18:58:08 TO THE SITE.
18:58:10 IN OUR REPORT, SUGGESTED REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND
18:58:11 SECOND READING.
18:58:13 THE APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED OUR CONCERNS AND THESE
18:58:16 REVISIONS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED.
18:58:18 BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
18:58:20 STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
18:58:23 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THAT CONCLUDES MY
18:58:24 PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
18:58:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS.
18:58:27 MR. ZAIN HUSSEIN.
18:58:28 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:58:30 ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:58:34 CASE REZ-21-99.
18:58:36 HEARD FOR FIRST READING.
18:58:39 THIS IS GOING PROPOSED REZONING FROM PD, PLANNED
18:58:44 DEVELOPMENT APPROVED REZ 18-12 TO PD RESIDENTIAL
18:58:48 MULTIFAMILY AND STRIP SHOPPING CENTER WITH ALL CI USES.
18:58:52 NOW IN THE APPROVED PD REZ 18-12 WHICH WAS APPROVED IN
18:58:59 2018, THIS WAS APPROVED FOR 18 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
18:59:01 UNITS WITH 18 BUILDINGS WITH AN ASSOCIATED CLUBHOUSE
18:59:05 AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND 10,400 SQUARE FEET OF
18:59:08 STRIP SHOPPING CENTER TO THE SOUTH WITH TWO BUILDINGS
18:59:12 ALLOWING ALL COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES.
18:59:15 THE SITE WAS NEVER DEVELOPED AND IS STILL CURRENTLY
18:59:17 VACANT.
18:59:26 I WILL NOW TAKE YOU TO THE PROPOSED WAIVERS.
18:59:30 ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE THREE PROPOSED WAIVERS, ALL TO DO
18:59:34 WITH NATURAL RESOURCES AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING.
18:59:38 YOU HAVE PARKING, THE REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFER AND
18:59:42 MASONRY WALL AND 50% RETENTION OF NONWOODED LOTS OVER
18:59:48 ONE ACRE TO 34%.
18:59:55 COMING TO THE OVERHEAD AERIAL OF THE SITE.
18:59:57 YOU WILL SEAT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
19:00:02 EAST BROADWAY DOWN TO THE SOUTH RUNNING EAST TO WEST.
19:00:06 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN THIS PD IS FOR 104
19:00:10 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS AS WELL AS STRIP
19:00:13 SHOPPING CENTER TO THE SOUTH, AS I WILL SHOW YOU IN THE
19:00:14 SITE PLAN.
19:00:18 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 7.1 ACRES IN
19:00:19 SIZE.
19:00:22 THE RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMMUNITY WILL BE 58,282
19:00:25 SQUARE FEET, WHICH INCLUDES 13 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
19:00:28 AND AN OFFICE AND A STORAGE AREA.
19:00:31 THE SHOPPING PLAZA TO THE SOUTH WILL COMPRISE OF TWO
19:00:38 RETAIL BUILDINGS FOR A TOTAL OF 10,400 SQUARE FEET.
19:00:44 NOW TO THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST, A COMBINATION OF
19:00:49 ATTACHED, SEMI DETACHED AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCES ALL
19:00:51 WITHIN THE RM-16 ZONING DISTRICT.
19:00:56 TO THE SOUTH AS YOU WILL SEE HERE, YOU WILL HAVE
19:00:59 COMMERCIAL USES ON BOTH SIDES OF EAST BROADWAY WITH ALL
19:01:02 CI USES.
19:01:09 THE PROPOSED -- I WILL NOW PULL THE SITE PLAN.
19:01:13 ALL RIGHT, YOU WILL SEE THOSE 13 RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED
19:01:17 UNITS, A AS WELL AS THE TWO RETAIL STRIP SHOPPING
19:01:19 CENTER.
19:01:22 THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE
19:01:26 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY IS 25 FEET IN HEIGHT.
19:01:31 THE PROPOSED HEIGHT FOR THE PLAZA IS ALSO 25 FEET IN
19:01:33 HEIGHT.
19:01:37 VEHICULAR ACCESS COMES FROM EAST 14TH AVENUE, AS WELL
19:01:41 AS BROADWAY -- EAST BROADWAY AVENUE.
19:01:44 A TOTAL OF 235 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND THE
19:01:52 APPLICANT IS REQUIRING 222 WHICH CALLS FOR A WAIVER.
19:01:56 COMING NOW TO THE ELEVATIONS OF THE SITE.
19:02:00 YOU WILL SEE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE RESIDENTIAL.
19:02:05 FRONT ELEVATIONS, REAR ELEVATIONS.
19:02:07 AND THEN COMING TO THE ELEVATIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL
19:02:10 RETAIL SPACE TO THE SOUTH.
19:02:12 FRONT ELEVATIONS.
19:02:18 REAR ELEVATIONS.
19:02:22 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, I PLAYED A GREAT GAME OF
19:02:26 FROGGER AND TRYING NOT TO GET HIT BY CARS BUT WHAT I
19:02:28 CAN DO WITHOUT GOING IN THE GATED COMMUNITY.
19:02:29 A SITE HERE.
19:02:31 VACANT PARCEL OF LAND.
19:02:34 WEST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE THOSE RESIDENTIAL HOMES THAT
19:02:35 WE TALKED ABOUT.
19:02:42 MIX OF MULTIFAMILY, DETACHED, SEMI DETACHED.
19:02:44 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE EAST BROADWAY
19:02:50 GOING EAST AND WEST WITH RESIDENTIAL ALSO OUT THERE.
19:02:54 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, WE WILL HAVE EAST BROADWAY AND
19:03:00 RESIDENTIAL -- RESIDENTIAL AND CI USES HERE.
19:03:04 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE A -- THIS IS A
19:03:13 CAR REPAIR AND ATTACHMENTS SHOP FOR CARS.
19:03:16 UPON REVIEW, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF
19:03:19 HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT AN FINAL IT INCONSISTENT
19:03:21 WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:03:24 IT WAS FOUND INCONSISTENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION AND
19:03:25 NATURAL RESOURCES.
19:03:29 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN WILL BE NEEDED TO BE
19:03:32 MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND ALSO FOLLOW
19:03:33 THE REVISION SHEET.
19:03:35 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:03:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
19:03:40 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
19:03:41 APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT.
19:03:47 YES, SIR.
19:03:49 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
19:03:54 >> GOOD EVENING, TRAVIS HILLS, 5620 EAST TEMPLE
19:03:59 TERRACE, EAST FOWLER AVENUE, TEMPLE TERRACE, SWEET 4.
19:04:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HAVEN'T SEEN THAT GUY IN A LONG
19:04:04 WHILE.
19:04:06 >> SO I KNOW IT IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT TONIGHT.
19:04:08 WE ARE ON A DIFFERENT SIDE OF TOWN, EAST TAMPA, WHERE
19:04:12 WE STILL HAVE RESIDENTS WHICH I AM A NATIVE OF.
19:04:14 SO I AM PLEASED TO PROPOSE BRINGING FORTH THE PROJECT
19:04:17 THAT WILL PROVIDE HOUSING AND ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
19:04:21 FOR HOUSING IN EAST TAMPA.
19:04:25 AS NOTED, IT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR FEW LESSER UNITS.
19:04:28 SO WE HAVE RETOOLED THE PROJECT.
19:04:34 AND WE WERE ABLE TO ADD ABOUT 40 UNITS.
19:04:43 I THINK THE INITIAL SUBMISSION WAS QUITE CONSERVATIVE
19:04:45 AND OVER TIME IN LOOKING AT THE CONDITIONS AND THE
19:04:48 COMMUNITY AND THE CHANGES.
19:04:52 IT WAS DECIDED THAT WE WOULD -- AND THIS -- WHAT WE
19:04:56 ARE ASKING FOR IS BY FAR NOT THE EXTENT OF WHAT WE
19:04:59 COULD HAVE ASKED FOR ON FIVE ACRES.
19:05:02 YOU KNOW, AS WE HAVE SEEN WITH THE OTHER PROPOSALS.
19:05:07 SO BASICALLY, WE ARE STILL REMAINING CONSERVATIVE IN
19:05:09 OUR -- IN OUR REQUEST.
19:05:13 AS FAR AS THE PARKING WAIVER IS CONCERNED, IT IS AN
19:05:18 OVERALL WAIVER FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
19:05:23 AND THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF THAT NUMBER THAT IS KIND
19:05:27 OF AT QUESTION WITH REGARD TO THE NEED FOR IT.
19:05:31 BECAUSE THERE IS A RESTAURANT WHICH CITY STAFF DECIDED
19:05:34 THAT, WELL, LET'S GO FOR THE MAXIMUM BASED ON SQUARE
19:05:38 FOOTAGE, BUT WHEN IT IS CALCULATED IS ACTUALLY THE NET
19:05:40 SQUARE FOOTAGE THE USED SPACE.
19:05:43 SO BASICALLY PART OF THAT BUFFER ACCOUNTS FOR KITCHEN
19:05:48 AND STORAGE AND OTHER SPACES THAT WON'T BE REQUIRED
19:05:49 WHEN WE GET TO PERMITTING.
19:05:52 SO WE ARE ASKING FOR 6%.
19:05:55 AND WE ARE SURE IT WILL BE LESS THAN THAT AT
19:05:56 PERMITTING.
19:05:59 SO I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU WILL CONSIDER
19:06:01 APPROVAL OF OUR SUBMISSION.
19:06:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
19:06:05 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
19:06:06 >>LYNN HURTAK: I DO.
19:06:09 MY BIGGEST CONCERN ABOUT THIS IS THE -- IS THE WOOD
19:06:13 WALL VERSUS THE MASONRY WALL JUST TO HAVE A NICE BUFFER
19:06:17 BETWEEN PEOPLE'S LIVES AND, YOU KNOW, THE COMMERCIAL
19:06:18 USE.
19:06:21 IS THERE A YOU COULD RECONSIDER ON THAT?
19:06:26 >> ACTUALLY, I DO BELIEVE THAT WE DID SUBMIT FOR A
19:06:28 MASONRY WALL.
19:06:31 I THINK THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN SOME MISCOMMUNICATION.
19:06:35 IT IS ON THE SITE PLAN AS A MASONRY WALL.
19:06:38 I THINK WHERE THE FOOD FENCE CAME IN WAS ON THE
19:06:40 RESIDENTIAL PERIMETER.
19:06:43 SO BASICALLY THAT WOULD BE TO THE ROADWAY TO OTHER
19:06:45 RESIDENTIAL.
19:06:46 >> OKAY.
19:06:48 >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY, THAT MAKES SENSE.
19:06:49 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:06:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
19:06:53 [INAUDIBLE]
19:06:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE WAIVER FROM THE CITY SAYS 235
19:07:02 SPACES AND WHEN YOU TURN IT THE OTHER WAY, SAYS 225 TO
19:07:03 22.
19:07:07 YOU LOOKED AT THAT AND I SAID THREE SPACES AT 6%.
19:07:10 I BELIEVE THAT THE FRONT SIDE MIGHT BE CORRECT BUT THE
19:07:11 ONE IN RED IS INCORRECT.
19:07:12 >> I CAN EXPLAIN THAT.
19:07:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BEING INCORRECT.
19:07:18 >> AND THAT BASICALLY WHAT I WAS ALLUDING TO WITH THE
19:07:22 ORIGINAL NUMBER WAS THE SMALLER NUMBER BASED ON
19:07:25 KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THAT RESTAURANT IS GOING TO BE
19:07:28 CONSIDERED AND WHAT THE REAL REQUIREMENTS ARE GOING TO
19:07:29 BE.
19:07:33 SO WITH THAT, THEY JUST DID A LITTLE BIT MORE BUFFER
19:07:37 JUST IN CASE THOSE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF USE ON THE INSIDE
19:07:39 OF THE BUILDING BECOME MAXIMIZE.
19:07:43 SO THAT IS WHERE IT JUST DIDN'T TRANSLATE.
19:07:46 BUT IT WILL BE RESOLVED BY SECOND READING.
19:07:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AGREE WITH COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK,
19:07:57 THE WOOD -- YOU HAVE A MASONRY EIGHT-FOOT WALL AND GOES
19:08:00 DOWN TO SIX-FOOT WOOD.
19:08:01 >> ON A DIFFERENT SIDE BASICALLY.
19:08:04 BECAUSE THE BUFFER BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE
19:08:07 COMMERCIAL WILL BE THE STANDARD MASONRY --
19:08:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM TRYING TO SAVE YOU TROUBLE IN
19:08:11 THE LONG RUN.
19:08:14 WOOD DOESN'T STAND UP TOO LONG FOR A LONG PERIOD OF
19:08:14 TIME.
19:08:17 FROM THE MOISTURE AND THE GROUND UP.
19:08:20 JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU OUGHT TO CONSIDER JUST FOR
19:08:22 MASONRY.
19:08:24 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.
19:08:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
19:08:28 FROM THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THIS PROPERTY, WAS THIS
19:08:31 AT ONE TIME A MOBILE HOME PARK?
19:08:33 >> YES, IT WAS.
19:08:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO IT WAS RESIDENCES AT ONE TIME.
19:08:38 >> YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
19:08:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE ELSE.
19:08:41 ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM
19:08:44 NUMBER 7?
19:08:46 >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
19:08:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS AND NO ONE
19:08:51 FROM THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 7.
19:08:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
19:08:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE CLOSE OUT?
19:08:56 YES, MA'AM.
19:08:59 >>LYNN HURTAK: I GUESS I WANT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE
19:09:02 BETWEEN WOOD AND MASONRY.
19:09:07 SO ARE WE AGREEING TO CHANGE THAT?
19:09:11 >> SO ARE WE TALKING OF THE PERIMETER OF THE ENTIRE
19:09:11 RESIDENTIAL AREA?
19:09:15 BECAUSE THE WOOD -- THE WOOD BASICALLY THAT WAS BEING
19:09:18 PROPOSED -- THAT IS NOT NECESSARILY WHAT WOULD BE USED,
19:09:23 BUT THAT IS NOT UNCOMMON IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA AND
19:09:23 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:09:28 IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS BUFFER CAN FROM.
19:09:31 NOT BUFFERING BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL,
19:09:35 JUST THE EXTERIOR -- IN FACT THE LANDSCAPING WILL
19:09:40 PROBABLY BE MORE OF THE BUFFER THAN THE FENCE ITSELF.
19:09:43 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES, I AM FINE WITH THE MASONRY BETWEEN
19:09:44 THE COMMERCIAL.
19:09:49 I MEAN, YES, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA IS CORRECT THAT WOOD
19:09:52 DOESN'T LAST, BUT UNDERSTANDING THAT MANY NEIGHBORS
19:09:56 BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DO USE THAT, THAT
19:09:57 DOES MAKE SENSE.
19:09:59 THANK YOU.
19:09:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
19:10:00 YES, SIR.
19:10:03 >> FOR THE RECORD, I WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD, THE
19:10:10 WAIVER NUMBER 2, ALLUDING TO REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFER
19:10:16 AND SIX-FOOT MASONRY TO SIX FEET AND FENCE TO WEST HAS
19:10:20 BEEN REQUESTED BY NATURAL RESOURCES AND WILL STILL BE
19:10:24 VALUE ITS FOR THE SECOND READING.
19:10:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD.
19:10:26 ANYBODY ELSE?
19:10:27 NO?
19:10:27 MOTION TO CLOSE.
19:10:29 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION.
19:10:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
19:10:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON, I BELIEVE IT
19:10:35 IS YOUR TURN.
19:10:38 >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NO. TA/CPA
19:10:42 NUMBER REZ-21-99, ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING
19:10:48 CONSIDERATION IN 5242 AND 5250 EAST BROADWAY AVENUE IN
19:10:50 THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
19:10:53 IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD
19:10:56 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
19:10:58 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND STRIP SHOPPING CENTER
19:11:02 WHERE IS ALL CI USE PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND
19:11:05 WOULD ALSO LIKE TO STATE THIS IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
19:11:09 APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES WITH THE
19:11:10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED REZONING
19:11:18 COMPLIANCE WITH LAND USE POLICY 9.8.4 SEEK TO ENSURE
19:11:21 AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF TAMPA'S HOUSING AND GROWTH
19:11:24 POPULATION AND ENCOURAGED HOUSING THROUGH THE
19:11:29 REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES.
19:11:35 THE PROPOSED REZONING 1.3.1 AND 1.3.4 BY UTILIZING A
19:11:38 VACANT SITE AND PROVIDING GOODS AND SERVICES FOR THE
19:11:38 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:11:41 AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
19:11:44 PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE
19:11:47 IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE
19:11:47 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:11:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE SUBSTITUTION REVISION SHEET.
19:11:54 >>BILL CARLSON: INCLUDING THE SUBSTITUTE REVISION.
19:11:55 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
19:11:59 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:12:01 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:12:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:12:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:12:04 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
19:12:05 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:12:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:12:09 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19:12:14 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:12:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:12:17 FIVE MORE CASES TO GO.
19:12:22 ITEM NUMBER 8.
19:12:24 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
19:12:26 ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:12:32 CASE REZ-22-03 BEING HEARD FOR THE ZONING AT
19:12:39 1304 EAST 23RD AVENUE, PROPOSED REZONING FROM PD TO PD
19:12:40 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
19:12:43 I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
19:12:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS.
19:12:47 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING
19:12:47 COMMISSION STAFF.
19:12:48 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:12:51 BEFORE WE GET STARTED, I WANT TO MAKE A CORRECTION FOR
19:12:52 THE RECORD.
19:12:56 ON THE TOP OF OUR REPORT HAVING INCORRECTLY REZONING AT
19:12:57 21-53.
19:13:01 THE HEADING SHOULD BE REZONING 22-03.
19:13:04 OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
19:13:07 AND MORE PARTICULARLY THE YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:13:11 THE SUBJECT IS IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
19:13:15 CASCADE IAN PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY
19:13:18 LOCATED 750 FEET SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND TRANSIT
19:13:22 STOP CLOSEST IS 500 FEET NORTHEAST FROM THE SUBJECT
19:13:23 SITE.
19:13:27 NORTH 14TH STREET.
19:13:29 THE STOP PROVIDES SERVICE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND THE
19:13:30 UNIVERSITY.
19:13:33 IT IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
19:13:35 THERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND
19:13:37 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
19:13:44 YOU WILL SEE IT IS JUST NORTHWEST OF REPUBLIC DE CUBA
19:13:49 AND EAST 23RD AVENUE, IT IS ON THE CUL-DE-SAC.
19:13:52 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN
19:13:55 CHARACTER AND MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE
19:13:58 AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH AND
19:14:02 EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:14:05 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:14:08 ON THE SUBJECT SITE WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE
19:14:10 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
19:14:13 THE R-10 TO THE NORTHEAST, EAST OF SUBJECT SITE.
19:14:17 THERE IS A PARCEL RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20,
19:14:19 DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SITE.
19:14:24 AND THERE IS A PARCEL, I BELIEVE IT IS RECOGNIZED UNDER
19:14:28 THE PUBLIC, SEMIPUBLIC ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:14:31 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IN ADVERSE IMPACTS TO
19:14:32 THE SURROUNDING AREA.
19:14:39 LARGE PARCEL DESIGNATED WITH THE R-35 FUTURE LAND USE
19:14:41 DESIGNATION TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
19:14:43 DEVELOPED WITH MULTIFAMILY USES.
19:14:47 TO THE EAST, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES UNDER THE
19:14:49 RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE.
19:14:52 AND PORTION OF EAST 23RD AVENUE TO NORTH 15TH STREET
19:14:58 HAS AN EXISTING OF 8.61 UNITS PER ACRE BASED ON 16
19:14:58 SITES.
19:15:02 PROPOSED PD WILL ALLOW FOR ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
19:15:08 RESIDENCE IN AN OVERALL OF 7.69 UNITS PER ACRE
19:15:12 CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY UNDER THE R-10 LAND USE
19:15:15 DESIGNATION AND BELOW THE EXISTING DENSITY OF THE
19:15:15 BLOCK.
19:15:18 THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT SIMILAR --
19:15:21 THAT IS SIMILAR IN FORM, HEIGHT AND SCALE TO THE
19:15:23 SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
19:15:24 THE REQUEST OF MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
19:15:28 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
19:15:30 THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES HOUSING ON
19:15:34 VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE
19:15:38 SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S
19:15:41 CURRENT AND PRESENT POPULATIONS.
19:15:43 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE
19:15:46 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
19:15:47 PLAN.
19:15:48 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
19:15:52 AIL AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:15:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS?
19:15:53 ZAIN HUSSEIN.
19:15:57 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:15:59 CASE 22-03.
19:16:02 THE APPLICANT IS EUGENE ANTHONY COSTA.
19:16:06 LOCATION AT 1304 EAST 23RD AVENUE.
19:16:14 IN PROPOSED REZONING FROM PD Z 82-91 TO PLANNED
19:16:16 DEVELOPMENT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
19:16:23 NOW THIS WAS APPROVED AS A PD Z 82-91 FOR PART OF A --
19:16:25 SORRY, HOSPITAL EXPANSION.
19:16:28 NOW THE SITE WAS NEVER DEVELOPED ON AND THE LAND HERE
19:16:30 IS STILL VACANT.
19:16:33 JUST GIVING YOU AN OUTLINE OVERHEAD VIEW, AND YOU WILL
19:16:38 SEE THE PARCEL HERE OUTLINE IN RED.
19:16:45 THE LOT AREA HERE IS .127 ACRE OR 5760 SQUARE FEET IN
19:16:46 SIZE.
19:16:50 THE PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS 3329 SQUARE
19:16:51 FEET.
19:16:54 AND THE ACCESSORY BUILDING IN THE BACK WILL BE 358
19:17:01 SQUARE FEET FOR A TOTAL 367 SQUARE FEET IN TOTAL
19:17:02 BUILDING AREA.
19:17:04 THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE RESIDENTIAL
19:17:07 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED WITH PD ZONING UP HERE.
19:17:09 THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
19:17:12 DETACHED, WHICH IS RS-50 ZONING.
19:17:16 THE PROPERTY ITSELF IS A SENIOR HOUSING FACILITY WHICH
19:17:17 IS PD.
19:17:20 AND THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND
19:17:28 WHICH IS PD ZONING AT THIS TIME.
19:17:34 THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING AS I WILL SHOW YOU ON THE SITE
19:17:39 PLAN -- THIS BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO BE 34 FEET IN
19:17:42 HEIGHT AND THE ACCESSORY BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO BE 13
19:17:44 FEET IN HEIGHT.
19:17:48 VEHICULAR ACCESS COMES FROM THE SOUTH HERE ON EAST 23RD
19:17:53 AVENUE.
19:17:56 LOOKING AT THE ELEVATIONS.
19:18:00 YOU SEE NORTH AND SOUTH.
19:18:08 AND YOU WILL SEE EAST AND WEST.
19:18:10 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THE VACANT
19:18:14 PARCEL OF LAND.
19:18:17 THE PUBLIC NOTICE IN THE FRONT.
19:18:21 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE PART OF THE SENIOR
19:18:27 FACILITY AND ALSO VACANT PARCEL OF LAND TO THE WEST.
19:18:30 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THAT RESIDENTIAL
19:18:31 SINGLE-FAMILY WE TALKED ABOUT.
19:18:33 AND ALSO TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THAT
19:18:41 SENIOR HOUSING FACILITY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND
19:18:44 COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS
19:18:46 THE OVERALL REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
19:18:48 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:18:51 MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE
19:18:54 APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IF APPROVED.
19:18:55 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:18:57 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
19:18:59 NO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
19:19:01 DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR THIS?
19:19:03 YES, SIR.
19:19:06 ITEM NUMBER 8.
19:19:08 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
19:19:15 >> GOOD EVENING, EUGENE COSTA, 1220 EAST CUMBERLAND
19:19:16 AVENUE.
19:19:19 I AM THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND GO
19:19:20 FROM PD TO PD.
19:19:23 THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR 40 YEARS.
19:19:26 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE WEST WAS JUST RECENTLY
19:19:30 APPROVED FOR A SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT.
19:19:33 THEY ARE GOING TO BUILD A HOUSE ON THAT AS WELL.
19:19:36 AND MY FAMILY IS ACTUALLY OWNED TWO BLOCKS OF THAT
19:19:40 PROPERTY ON THAT SIDE OF THE STREET FOR 100 YEARS OR
19:19:40 SO.
19:19:43 AND SO WE ARE GOING TO BUILD A HOUSE FOR OURSELVES IF
19:19:45 YOU GUYS WILL APPROVE OUR PD.
19:19:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
19:19:50 ALL RIGHT.
19:19:52 ANYBODY HERE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS
19:19:53 ITEM.
19:19:54 ITEM NUMBER 8?
19:19:57 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM.
19:19:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT, THE GENTLEMAN IN THE BACK.
19:20:03 PLEASE STATES YOUR NAME.
19:20:04 >> NATHAN HAGAN.
19:20:07 I WILL KEEP THIS SHORT.
19:20:13 KNOW WHY IS A PD AND WE SHOULD FIX THAT.
19:20:18 >>LYNN HURTAK: AID SIMILAR QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
19:20:22 >> BUT I WANT TO SAY, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT.
19:20:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COSTA, SHE HAS A QUESTION.
19:20:29 >>LYNN HURTAK: WHAT IS THE REASON YOU WENT TO PD
19:20:32 INSTEAD OF RS-50?
19:20:38 >> HONESTLY, I THINK IT'S -- IT WAS RECOMMENDED TO ME.
19:20:40 MY ARCHITECT TOLD ME THAT WOULD BE THE BETTER WAY TO
19:20:41 GO.
19:20:45 IT WOULD ALLOW US -- NOT REALLY ASKING FOR ANY WAIVERS
19:20:47 OR ANYTHING.
19:20:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
19:20:49 MOTION TO CLOSE.
19:20:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MOVED.
19:20:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT, MR. HUSSEIN, DO YOU HAVE
19:20:56 ANYTHING?
19:20:58 YOU ARE GOOD.
19:20:59 ALL IN FAVOR.
19:21:03 ANY OPPOSED.
19:21:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA, TAKE ITEM NUMBER
19:21:06 8.
19:21:08 >>LUIS VIERA: I MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
19:21:12 READING, ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
19:21:16 VICINITY OF 1304 EAST 23RD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
19:21:18 FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
19:21:22 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED
19:21:22 DEVELOPMENT.
19:21:26 THE PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
19:21:31 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:21:34 OH, AND THEN SUPPORTING DISH DON'T HAVE THE SUPPORTING
19:21:36 DOCUMENT WITH ME.
19:21:39 I FIND THAT THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ARE
19:21:43 PROPER AND ADOPT THEM.
19:21:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
19:21:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM NUMBER 8, 22-03 REZ.
19:21:56 I WANT TO MAKE SURE I GOT THE --
19:21:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY
19:22:03 ENCOURAGE NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUSED PLAN TO
19:22:06 ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S PRESENT AND
19:22:09 FUTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE
19:22:12 DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED
19:22:16 UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND WILL NOT BE AND
19:22:18 ALTER THE CHARACTER AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
19:22:23 PORTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE POLICY 9.2.1 AND
19:22:24 9.3.
19:22:28 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PROMOTES AND
19:22:31 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND
19:22:33 COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:22:38 PROPOSED USE FOR MOST EFFICIENT AND SUBSTANTIAL USE OF
19:22:39 LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
19:22:42 BY THE WAY, THAT WAS THE NEIGHBORHOOD I WAS RAISED IN.
19:22:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND THE REVISION SHEET.
19:22:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOW THAT YOU BROUGHT UP CASCADE
19:22:54 IAN, YOU TOOK THE MAP, THE SOFTBALL FIELD IS IN THE
19:22:56 WRONG LOCATION.
19:22:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA AND
19:23:00 A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
19:23:01 ROLL CALL.
19:23:03 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:23:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:23:05 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:23:06 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
19:23:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
19:23:08 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:23:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:23:11 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19:23:16 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:23:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:23:20 MR. HUSSEIN.
19:23:24 ITEM NUMBER 10.
19:23:27 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN,
19:23:28 LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:23:36 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10, REZ 22-16, 814 WEST AMELIA
19:23:41 AVENUE FROM RS-06 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50
19:23:43 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
19:23:45 TO MR. COLLINS, PLANNING COMMISSION.
19:23:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS, GO AHEAD.
19:23:56 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN.
19:24:01 THIS IS DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
19:24:02 STAFF.
19:24:03 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:24:06 OUR NEXT CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
19:24:09 AND RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:24:13 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY BEING LOCATED
19:24:18 APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
19:24:24 CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS 500 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF
19:24:28 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
19:24:32 SERVICE TO THE WESTSHORE PLAZA TRANSIT CENTER.
19:24:35 THE SITE IS IN EVACUATION ZONE B.
19:24:37 AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING SITE AND SURROUNDING
19:24:38 PROPERTIES.
19:24:40 YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED WITH THE PURPLE
19:24:42 COLOR.
19:24:45 GENERALLY SOUTH AND WEST AMELIA AVENUE AND EAST OF
19:24:47 NORTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE.
19:24:49 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY
19:24:51 DETACHED IN CHARACTER.
19:24:54 ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS WEST COLUMBUS
19:24:57 DRIVE.
19:25:00 THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
19:25:05 RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
19:25:08 RESIDENTIAL-10 SURROUNDS THE SUBJECT SITE ON ALL SIDES.
19:25:10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
19:25:12 FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
19:25:12 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:25:14 THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SIMILAR
19:25:18 IN FORM, SITE AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL
19:25:19 UNITS IN THE RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:25:24 THIS PORTION OF WEST AMELIA AVENUE BETWEEN WEST OF
19:25:28 NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE AND EAST OF NORTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE
19:25:31 PRESENTLY UNDERDEVELOPED.
19:25:36 THIS SEGMENT EXISTING DENSITY OF 6.59 UNITS PER ACRE
19:25:39 BASED ON 19 SITES ALONG THE SEGMENT.
19:25:42 THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL INFILL PLANNED
19:25:45 FOR UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
19:25:48 PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORT MANY POLICIES IN THE
19:25:51 COMPREHENSIVE OF HOUSING CITY POPULATION.
19:25:55 ENCOURAGES HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO
19:25:58 ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF
19:26:01 TAMPA'S FUTURE AND PRESENT POPULATIONS.
19:26:04 BASED ON THE CONSIDERATION, PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS
19:26:09 IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE
19:26:09 IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:26:12 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
19:26:12 ANY QUESTIONS.
19:26:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM MR. COLLINS.
19:26:16 OKAY.
19:26:18 MR. ZAIN HUSSEIN, TAKE IT AWAY.
19:26:20 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: ZAIN HUSSEIN.
19:26:22 REZ-22-16.
19:26:25 THE APPLICANT IS JOHN LAROCCA.
19:26:32 LOCATION 814 WEST AMELIA AVENUE FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
19:26:35 THIS BEING EUCLIDIAN, NO WAIVERS AND NO SITE PLAN.
19:26:39 I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE A LITTLE BIT OF THE PLAT
19:26:39 HERE.
19:26:43 YOU SEE THAT THE PARCEL IS ON LOT 9 AND 10 HERE ON
19:26:48 AMELIA.
19:26:51 AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE OVERHEAD AERIAL ALSO.
19:26:57 YOU SEE THE PARCEL OUT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
19:26:59 NOW THIS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL
19:27:01 SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
19:27:07 THE PROPERTY CONTAINS .30 -- .31 ACRES.
19:27:10 THE SITE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH ONE SINGLE-FAMILY
19:27:12 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AT THIS TIME.
19:27:16 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED PD AND RS-60.
19:27:18 AND PROPERTIES TO THE WEST, SOUTH AND EAST ARE ZONED
19:27:21 RS-60.
19:27:24 ALL AROUND THE PARCEL, NORTHWEST, SOUTH AND EAST ARE
19:27:30 ALL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS.
19:27:33 I WILL NOW SHOW YOU A LITTLE BIT OF CONSISTENCY
19:27:38 COMPATIBILITY MAP.
19:27:41 STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT 60% OF THE LOTS IN THE
19:27:46 STUDIED AREA, 60% OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK, 66 OF THE
19:27:50 BLOCK OF THE WEST OF AMELIA AND 50% OF THE BLOCK FACE
19:27:55 ARE WITH LOT WIDTHS OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS.
19:27:57 STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REQUEST FOR ARE THE HE ZONING
19:28:00 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
19:28:08 OF THE OVERALL AREA AND BLOCK FACE.
19:28:12 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, TOOK PICTURES.
19:28:18 YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE WITH THE PUBLIC NOTICE
19:28:18 SIGN.
19:28:21 TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
19:28:25 TO THE EAST OF THE SITE AND WEST OF THE SITE,
19:28:31 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
19:28:33 AFTER ANALYSIS, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE
19:28:36 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE
19:28:38 REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
19:28:39 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:28:42 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
19:28:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:28:45 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
19:28:46 NOPE?
19:28:53 MR. LAROCCA.
19:28:57 >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF CITY
19:28:57 COUNCIL.
19:28:58 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
19:29:02 MY NAME IS JOHN LAROCCA, AGENT FOR THE OWNER,
19:29:04 REPRESENTING THE OWNER AND APPLICANT.
19:29:09 THIS IS -- MY ADDRESS 101 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, TAMPA.
19:29:11 THIS IS A CLASSIC CASE OF INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
19:29:14 THE TWO REPORTS FILED WITH CITY COUNCIL FOR
19:29:16 CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
19:29:20 STAFF AND THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF CLEARLY
19:29:26 DEPICT CONSISTENCY WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE CITY'S LAND
19:29:30 DEVELOPMENT CODE AND LONG-RANGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:29:35 TO ADD A LITTLE BIT OF FLAVOR TO WHAT MR. HUSSEIN
19:29:37 MENTION THIS EVENING, THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, THE TWO
19:29:41 PLOTTED LOTS OF RECORD WERE PLATTED AS PART OF THE
19:29:44 RIDGEWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION IN 1922.
19:29:50 THESE LOTS ARE 50 X 130 FEET WIDE OR 6700 SQUARE FEET
19:29:52 APPROXIMATELY.
19:29:56 THE EXISTING HOME THAT MR. HUSSEIN MENTIONED ON ONE OF
19:30:00 THE LOTS MEET ALL OF THE RS-50 REQUIREMENTS FOR
19:30:03 SETBACKS AS WILL THE PROPOSAL ON THIS STANDARD
19:30:05 REMAINING LOT THAT HAPPENS TO BE THE SIDE YARD OF THIS
19:30:07 PARTICULAR HOME.
19:30:10 I WON'T TALK ABOUT POLICIES AND PLANS.
19:30:12 THEY ARE ALL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
19:30:15 I CAN ONLY INDICATE THAT THE MAJORITY OF LOTS IN THIS
19:30:20 AREA AS MR. HUSSEIN REPORTED IN THE SITE ANALYSIS ARE
19:30:24 IN EXCESS OF 60% OF THE A AREA OF THE LOTS EXCEEDING OR
19:30:28 UNDERNEATH THE 59.99 FEET IN WIDTH.
19:30:32 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THIS.
19:30:35 AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
19:30:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN?
19:30:39 YES, MA'AM.
19:30:41 >>LYNN HURTAK: IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE INTENDING TO KEEP
19:30:41 THE ONE HOUSE.
19:30:43 >> AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
19:30:45 NOT ONE OF THE THOSE CASES WHERE THE LOT IS OVER THE
19:30:48 PROPERTY LINE AND WILL BE TORN DOWN TO CREATE TWO LOTS.
19:30:52 AT SOME POINT IN TIME THERE MAY BE, BUT THAT PARTICULAR
19:30:56 HOME MEETS ALL THE CRITERIA OF THE DISTRICT WITH NO
19:30:58 WAIVERS FOR CONDITIONS.
19:30:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:31:00 ANYBODY ELSE?
19:31:03 ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?
19:31:03 ANYBODY REGISTERED.
19:31:05 >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
19:31:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MOVED.
19:31:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
19:31:13 CITRO, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
19:31:14 ANY OPPOSED.
19:31:15 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
19:31:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, FILE NO.
19:31:21 10, REZ-22-16, ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
19:31:24 CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
19:31:28 GENERAL VICINITY OF 814 WEST AMELIA AVENUE IN THE CITY
19:31:31 OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
19:31:35 SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICTS CLASSIFICATION RS-06
19:31:38 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
19:31:40 SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
19:31:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
19:31:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND SECOND FROM
19:31:45 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
19:31:46 ROLL CALL.
19:31:47 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
19:31:48 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
19:31:50 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
19:31:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
19:31:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
19:31:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
19:31:57 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH GUDES BEING ABSENT AT
19:31:57 VOTE.
19:32:04 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MAY 5, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
19:32:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THREE MORE CASES TO GO.
19:32:14 ITEM NUMBER 11.
19:32:15 YES, SIR.
19:32:17 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ZAIN HUSSEIN,
19:32:18 LANDS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
19:32:21 AGENDA ITEM 11, CASE NUMBER 22-19.
19:32:24 THIS IS BEING HEARD FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERING FOR
19:32:28 THE LOCATION AT 407 AND 409 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE
19:32:34 PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
19:32:37 PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND
19:32:38 SEMI-DETACHED.
19:32:41 I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
19:32:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS, GO AHEAD.
19:32:47 >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR
19:32:47 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
19:32:49 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:32:51 THE NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
19:32:55 MORE PARTICULARLY IN THE SOUTH HOW -- TAMPA
19:32:56 NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:32:59 FOUR MILES SOUTH OF THE SITE.
19:33:04 THE SUBJECT IS WITHIN VICINITY OF TWO TRANSIT STOPS,
19:33:08 TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, BRITTON PLAZA TRANSFER
19:33:08 CENTER.
19:33:13 AND WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
19:33:15 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
19:33:16 SURROUNDING PROPERTY.
19:33:19 YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE LYING IN THIS PURPLE COLOR.
19:33:22 GENERALLY SOUTH OF WEST AZEELE STREETS AND JUST TO THE
19:33:26 WEST -- WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
19:33:29 SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN
19:33:30 CHARACTER.
19:33:34 THERE ARE SOME NONRESIDENTIAL USES TWO BLOCKS BEST OF
19:33:38 THE SUBJECT SITE ON SOUTH HOW WART AVENUE.
19:33:42 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
19:33:45 SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
19:33:48 RESIDENTIAL-35 LAND USE DESIGNATION AND RESIDENTIAL-35
19:33:52 SURROUNDS THE SUBJECT SITE ON BOTH SIDES.
19:33:56 ALONG HOWARD AVENUE AND ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE SUBJECT
19:33:57 SITE ON WEST PLATT STREET.
19:34:01 PARCELS THAT ARE RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED
19:34:05 USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
19:34:08 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
19:34:11 IF APPROVED, THE SUBJECT SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED AT A
19:34:16 DENSITY OF 13.79 UNITS PER ACRE WINTER WITH THE
19:34:20 DENSITY IN THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
19:34:22 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPEAKS TO THE DESIGN OF THE
19:34:26 ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS.
19:34:28 AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS ARE ORIENTED
19:34:31 INTERNALLY AND NO PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS PROVIDED TO
19:34:34 THE UNIT ENTRANCES AND THE SIDEWALKS ON SOUTH ALBANY
19:34:35 AVENUE.
19:34:38 CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF
19:34:42 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ORIENTATION OF A FRONT DOOR,
19:34:44 THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET.
19:34:46 >> THE CURRENT DESIGN IS A SAFETY CONCERN SINCE
19:34:49 RESIDENTS WILL BE FORCED TO WALK IN THE DRIVE AISLE TO
19:34:51 ACCESS A PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
19:34:55 THIS DESIGN IS INCONSISTENT WITH 9.2.2 WHICH REQUIRES
19:34:59 BUILDINGS IN URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS TO CONTAIN AN OVERALL
19:35:03 CONSISTENT SETBACK FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A
19:35:05 PLEASING RECOGNITION FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND
19:35:05 STREET.
19:35:07 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD FRONT SIDEWALK WITHOUT
19:35:12 DRIVE AISLES OR OTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
19:35:14 OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PD IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE
19:35:17 POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:35:22 THE PD DOES NOT ENGAGE THE PUBLIC REALM OR PROVIDE A
19:35:26 SAFE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE FAMILY UNITS TO THE
19:35:29 SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
19:35:33 THE PD DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGNATION OF THE
19:35:34 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:35:37 AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING
19:35:39 COMMISSION FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
19:35:40 OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
19:35:44 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
19:35:44 ANY QUESTIONS.
19:35:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:35:47 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN.
19:35:49 MR. HUSSEIN.
19:35:51 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN, ZAIN HUSSEIN.
19:35:56 CASE NUMBER 22-19, APPLICANT IS ALEX SCHALER AND TYLER
19:36:05 HUDSON FOR 407 AND 409 SOUTH ALBANY PROPOSED FROM RM-16
19:36:10 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
19:36:14 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND SEMI-DETACHED.
19:36:15 TWO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED.
19:36:17 ONE WAIVER FOR THE PARKING.
19:36:20 REQUESTING TWO PARKING SPACES REDUCED TO 14% REDUCTION.
19:36:25 AND ALSO AS DANNY ALLUDED TO, TO ALLOW THE GROUND
19:36:29 ENTRANCES FRONT DOORS TO FOUR DWELLING UNITS TO FACE
19:36:33 INTERNALLY.
19:36:37 AS I SHOW YOU THE AERIAL ON THE SITE, OUTLINED HERE IN
19:36:40 RED.
19:36:44 THE DEVELOPMENT IS BEING PROPOSED FOR FOUR SEMI
19:36:46 DETACHED TOWN HOMES AND TWO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
19:36:49 DETACHED HOMES.
19:36:55 THE LOT CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 12,845 SQUARE FEET.
19:37:05 ALSO -- OR BEING .29 ACRES.
19:37:08 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
19:37:08 USES.
19:37:12 PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND WEST ARE ZONED RM-16 AND
19:37:14 DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
19:37:17 PROPERTIES TO THE EAST ARE ZONED RM-16 AND DEVELOPED
19:37:20 WITH TOWN HOMES AND PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH ARE ZONED PD
19:37:23 AND DEVELOPED WITH A DUPLEX.
19:37:26 THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS 35 FEET IN
19:37:27 HEIGHT.
19:37:31 AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE -- VEHICULAR ACCESS OF
19:37:36 THE SITE COMES OFF OF SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
19:37:41 AS BY TO THE SITE PLAN, YOU WILL SEE WHAT THE APPLICANT
19:37:47 IS REFERRING FOR THOSE FOUR SEMI DETACHED AND THE TWO
19:37:54 DETACHED UNITS.
19:37:58 GO TO THE ELEVATIONS, YOU SEE THE EAST, WEST, NORTH
19:38:05 AND SOUTH ELEVATION.
19:38:10 I WENT OUT TO THE SITE TO SEE WHAT THE CURRENT
19:38:12 STRUCTURE ON THE SITE LOOKS LIKE.
19:38:20 SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE THOSE TOWN HOMES.
19:38:22 SOUTH OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL.
19:38:28 NORTH OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL.
19:38:31 IN DOING SO, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF
19:38:34 HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL
19:38:36 REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
19:38:37 DEVELOPMENT CODE.
19:38:40 MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN MUST BE MADE BETWEEN
19:38:41 FIRST AND SECOND READING IS APPROVED.
19:38:43 I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:38:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUSSEIN?
19:38:47 NO?
19:38:48 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
19:38:49 MR. HUDSON.
19:38:56 STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOU APPROACH THE LECTERN.
19:38:57 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
19:38:58 MY NAME IS TYLER HUDSON.
19:39:01 ADDRESS 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
19:39:03 WITH ME HERE THIS EVENING IS THE PROPERTY OWNER AND
19:39:07 APPLICANT, RYAN BASHERIM.
19:39:10 ALSO JOINING ME IS ALEX SCHALER, A LICENSED ENGINEER
19:39:15 WITH MY LAW FIRM AND ALEX RIOS, THE PROJECT ARCHITECT.
19:39:18 BEFORE JUMPING INTO MY PRESENTATION, I WOULD LIKE TO
19:39:22 PUT RECORD WHAT WAS UPLOADED FROM CELLA.
19:39:24 TWO LETTERS OF SUPPORT.
19:39:31 418 ALBANY AND 412 ALBANY.
19:39:47 LET ME TURN ON MY PRESENTATION.
19:39:50 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE SEE IT ON OUR SCREEN.
19:39:52 >> WONDERFUL.
19:39:55 IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE THE ONE WE PUT ON THIS
19:39:56 COMPUTER --
19:40:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: REZ 22-19.
19:40:03 IS THAT THE CORRECT ONE?
19:40:05 >> IT WAS ON THIS COMPUTER HERE.
19:40:09 SORRY.
19:40:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT DO YOU SEE ON YOUR SCREEN.
19:40:14 WE SEE IT HERE.
19:40:17 >> PARTICULAR OPEN THIS THING RIGHT HERE.
19:40:18 YEAH.
19:40:20 THANKS.
19:40:24 SORRY ABOUT THAT.
19:40:26 GOOD EVENING, AGAIN.
19:40:33 AS DANNY AND ZAIN ALLUDED TO, SPECIFICALLY IN THE
19:40:39 OSCAWANA AND ALBANY IN AN AREA HYDE PARK THAT IS SEEING
19:40:40 INTENSIFICATION.
19:40:42 .3 ACRE SITE.
19:40:44 TWO PLATTED LOTS.
19:40:46 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES CURRENTLY ON THEM.
19:40:49 THIS IS NOT LOCATED IN THE HYDE PARK LOCAL HISTORIC
19:40:50 DISTRICT.
19:40:55 NO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION HERE OR HYDE PARK
19:40:58 DESIGN STANDARDS ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR
19:40:59 PROPERTY DUE TO THE LOCATION.
19:41:00 WALK SCORE.
19:41:02 I THINK THAT IS UNDERSTATED.
19:41:04 THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE SECOND MOST WALKABLE IN THE
19:41:07 CITY ACCORDING TO WALKSCORE.COM.
19:41:11 TWO BLOCKS EAST OF THE SOUTH HOWARD BAR DISTRICTS.
19:41:15 I MAY LET ALEX WALK THROUGH THE SPECIFIC OF THE PROJECT
19:41:18 ARE, BUT I WANT TO NOTE ABOUT THE ZONING AND SOMETHING
19:41:20 COMING UP IN PRIOR HEARINGS.
19:41:23 LOOK AT THIS MAP, YOU SEE A WHOLE LOT OF PDS.
19:41:26 THE REASON FOR THAT AS THIS COUNCIL IS WELL KNOWN,
19:41:29 ZONING IMPLEMENTS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT IS
19:41:31 REQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW.
19:41:33 EVERY JURISDICTION HAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTED
19:41:34 BY ZONING.
19:41:38 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS R-35 WHICH TALKS OF MEDIUM
19:41:41 DENSITY UNITS UP TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE.
19:41:43 HEIGHTS UP TO EIGHT STORIES.
19:41:49 INCONSISTENTLY IMPLEMENTED WITH THIS RM-16 ZONING HERE.
19:41:53 REALLY NOT POSSIBLE TO UNLOCK THAT DENSITY OF YOUR
19:41:57 PREDECESSORS ON COUNCIL ADOPTED THROUGH THE
19:42:01 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THROUGH THE EUCLIDEAN RM-16 ZONING.
19:42:05 THAT IS WHY YOU SEE AN ABSOLUTE OCEAN OF PLANNED
19:42:09 DEVELOPMENT REZONINGS IN THIS VICINITY BECAUSE OF WHAT
19:42:12 WE BELIEVE IS APPROPRIATE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED THAT
19:42:14 THIS PROJECT IS HERE TO ADDRESS.
19:42:17 TURN IT OVER TO ALEX WHO WILL WALK THROUGH SITE DETAILS
19:42:19 AND SOME WAIVERS.
19:42:22 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
19:42:26 ALEX SCHALER, 401 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
19:42:31 TO START LIKE TYLER SAID, THIS IS FOR SIX TOWN HOMES.
19:42:35 EXTERNALLY FACING PATIOS AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
19:42:38 SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH ALBANY IS STAYING.
19:42:40 MAIN ACCESS OFF OF ALBANY.
19:42:44 A THROUGH CONNECTION TO THE ALLEY ALSO.
19:42:48 IN TERMS OF STAFF SUPPORT, THE FINDINGS AS ZAIN
19:42:50 MENTIONED, DEVELOPMENTS COORDINATION FOUND THE
19:42:53 APPLICATION CONSISTENT ALONG WITH THE LIST OF OTHER
19:42:55 DEPARTMENTS WE HAVE BELOW, NATURAL RESOURCES,
19:42:59 STORMWATER, WASTEWATER AND TAMPA FIRE.
19:43:02 TWO WAIVERS BEING SUGGESTED IN CONJUNCTION THIS
19:43:03 APPLICATION.
19:43:05 FIRST ONE RELATING TO PARKING.
19:43:08 AND SECOND DIFFERENT ENTRANCE ORIENTATIONS WE HAVE
19:43:09 INTERNAL TO THE PROJECT.
19:43:12 WE HAVE EXTENSIVE WAIVER JUSTIFICATION THAT ARE
19:43:14 INCLUDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THOSE ARE IN THE FILE
19:43:14 AS WELL.
19:43:16 AND TO START OFF WITH PARKING.
19:43:19 SO WE ARE REDUCING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING FROM
19:43:23 14 SPACES TO 12 SPACES.
19:43:25 AS YOU WILL SEE IN THE CLICK OF THE SITE PLAN, TWO
19:43:28 SPACES PER UNIT WHICH IS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND EACH
19:43:33 OPPORTUNITY PARK $AT ENTIRETY OF TOTAL OF 12 SPACES.
19:43:35 THE TWO LEFT OFF FROM THE SITE PLAN IS VISITOR
19:43:38 REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING FOR CODE.
19:43:41 AS YOU SEE, WE SHOWED A CLIP OF THE SOUTH ALBANY AVE
19:43:44 DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT TWO PARCELS
19:43:47 AND THERE IS AVAILABLE STREET PARKING ALTHOUGH PERMIT
19:43:50 CONTROLLED OVERNIGHT, BUT DURING THE DAY, THAT IS
19:43:51 ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC.
19:43:54 AS TYLER HAD MENTIONED EARLIER, THE SPECIFIC POCKET OF
19:43:57 THE CITY IS VERY WALKABLE.
19:44:00 AND WE FEEL AS IF MANY OF THE DESTINATIONS AROUND HERE
19:44:05 CAN BE REACHED EITHER BY FOOT FOR BY BIKE FURTHER
19:44:09 JUSTIFYING A FALL FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
19:44:11 WE MENTIONED ENTRANCE ORIENTATION IS THE SECOND WAIVER
19:44:15 TO ALLOW GROUND FLOOR FOR FOUR DWELLING UNITS TO FACE
19:44:15 INTERNAL.
19:44:18 AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS GRAPHICALLY TRYING TO SHOW YOU
19:44:23 GUYS THAT SOUTH ALBANY AVE, OUR FRONTAGE IS ONLY 90
19:44:24 FEET WIDE.
19:44:26 EACH ONE OF THE UNITS IS 32 FEET IN WIDTH.
19:44:32 ROTATED AND WE COULD NOT FACE ALL SIX IN ALBANY AND WE
19:44:35 HAVE THE TWO THAT WE CAN FACING ALBANY AVE.
19:44:39 THIS IS A SCREEN SHOT FROM THE ELEVATION SHOWING THOSE
19:44:42 TWO DOORS OF UNITS 3 AND 6 THAT ARE FACING ALBANY
19:44:43 AVENUE.
19:44:48 AND THEN THIS IS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S LAND USE
19:44:51 DESIGNATION FOR SITE BUILDING FACADES IN ENTRANCES
19:44:57 ACROSS THE STREET AND HIGH DEGREE OF STREET-FRONTING
19:45:02 FACADE WITH UNITS 3 AND 6 PROVIDING AS MANY WINDOWS AS
19:45:04 WE CAN AND FRONT DOOR FACING ALBANY.
19:45:07 WE WANTED TO SPEAK TO THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
19:45:09 BECAUSE A MAJOR COMPONENT IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
19:45:11 REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
19:45:13 SECTION WE HAVE HIGHLIGHTED, ENTRANCES TO FOUR
19:45:16 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ORIENTED INTERNAL AND NO
19:45:19 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION IS PROVIDED.
19:45:21 WE HAVE GONE THROUGH RECENT COORDINATIONS WITH THE
19:45:23 PLANNING COMMISSION TO TRY TO ADDRESS THIS
19:45:26 UNDERSTANDING IT WAS THEIR MAIN CONCERN WITH THIS
19:45:26 APPLICATION.
19:45:30 THIS CAME IN A STAFF REPORT WHICH WE HAVE RECEIVED.
19:45:32 AND THIS SNIP OF THE SITE PLAN SHOWING THOSE ADDITIONAL
19:45:34 SIDEWALKS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED.
19:45:37 IT WAS TOO LATE, BUT WE DO PLAN TO MAKE THESE
19:45:40 ADJUSTMENTS BETWEEN THIS READ GOING WE ARE FORTUNATE
19:45:42 ENOUGH TO GAIN APPROVAL IN THE SECOND READING SO THAT
19:45:46 EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE UNITS, ALL SIX, WILL HAVE
19:45:49 DIRECT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO ALBANY AVE.
19:45:51 UNDERSTANDING THAT WAS A MAJOR CONCERN OF PLANNING
19:45:54 COMMISSION AND WEIGH WANTED TO DO OUR BEST TO TRY TO
19:45:54 ADDRESS THAT.
19:45:57 ANOTHER ISSUE THAT I THINK HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP, WITH
19:45:59 THE LIMITED OPPOSITION FILED WITH THIS CASE IS
19:46:03 REGARDING THE SETBACKS REGARDING ALBANY AVENUE.
19:46:06 WE WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT UP FRONT.
19:46:09 PARCELS 4 AND 5 SHOWN HERE IN THIS IMAGE IN ARE THE
19:46:11 SUBJECT PARCELS INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
19:46:14 CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS ARE 14 FEET AND 12 FEET.
19:46:17 OUR APPLICATION IS PROPOSING 10 AND WE FEEL IT IS
19:46:21 CONGRUENT WITH WHAT IS THERE EXISTING.
19:46:23 TABLE SHOWING THE SETBACKS THAT WE AVERAGED ESTIMATED
19:46:27 FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER SHOWING RELEVANT --
19:46:29 RELEVANTLY CLOSE TO WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING.
19:46:32 AND WE DID WANT TO NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT CURRENTLY
19:46:38 FROM OUR ESTIMATION A SINGLE LOT BLOCK THAT IS MEETING
19:46:40 A 25-FOOT SETBACK.
19:46:43 SOUTH ALBANY AVE HAS RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EAST AND TO
19:46:43 THE WEST.
19:46:46 AND THAT IS ADDITIONAL ROOM AGAINST THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL
19:46:51 ROAD SINCE THIS IS MEASURED DIRECTLY FROM THE PROPERTY
19:46:54 LINE TYLER TOUCHED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EARLIER
19:46:57 ALLOWING 30 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE.
19:47:01 SOME ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS WE FELT WERE NOT
19:47:05 CONSISTENT WITH THE RM-16 ZONING AND WANTED TO NOTE AND
19:47:07 FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THIS SITE BASED OFF
19:47:11 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND TOTAL ACREAGE ALLOWS FOR
19:47:12 NINE UNITS.
19:47:17 WE ARE PROPOSING SIX UNITS NOT MAXIMIZING THE DENSITY.
19:47:19 UNDERSTANDING THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES STILL
19:47:23 LOCATED ON THIS BLOCK, BUT WE THOUGHT SIX WAS A GREAT
19:47:27 MIX IN UNDERSTANDING THE COMP PLAN'S DESIGNATION AND
19:47:30 BEING RESPECTFUL TO THE PEOPLE ON THIS BLOCK OF
19:47:32 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
19:47:34 JUST FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE DENSITY AND I
19:47:37 THINK DANNY DID COVER THIS EARLIER, BUT CURRENTLY THE
19:47:41 AVERAGE IN THAT AREA, THAT SPECIFIC BLOCK IS 16.28 UNIT
19:47:42 PER ACRE.
19:47:44 OUR APPLICATION WOULD COME IN AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE
19:47:51 WHICH IS STILL ALLOW PER THE R-35 LAND USE DESIGNATION
19:47:52 FOR THE PROPERTY.
19:47:55 ZOOMING OUT A BIT FROM THE SPECIFIC BLOCK OF ALBANY TO
19:47:57 THE LARGER GREATER NEIGHBORHOOD AND SURROUNDING
19:47:59 VICINITY.
19:48:01 WE FOUND A COUPLE OF PRECEDENTS THAT PETITION FELT
19:48:05 WOULD PAINT A PICTURE WHAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD LOOK
19:48:06 LIKE.
19:48:09 SIMILARLY THERE ARE ONE IS TO THE WEST OF THE PUBLIX IN
19:48:12 HYDE PARK SHOWING THOSE UNITS FACING INTERNAL WITH THE
19:48:14 MAIN ACCESS DRIVE AISLE BETWEEN THEM.
19:48:16 THE SUBJECT SITE IS STARRED IN RED.
19:48:17 THAT ONE IS IN BLUE.
19:48:19 RELATIVELY CLOSE.
19:48:22 THE NEXT ONE MOVING NORTH FOUR BLOCKS NORTH ON TOP OF
19:48:26 KENNEDY THERE, 1912 WEST NORTH 8TH STREET.
19:48:29 A VERY SIMILAR DESIGN WHERE ALL THE UNITS ARE INTERNAL
19:48:31 FACING WITH THE EXCEPTING OF THOSE LOCATED ALONG THE
19:48:35 PROPERTY'S FRONTAGE ALONG WEST NORTH A HAVING ACCESS TO
19:48:38 NORTH 8TH STREET VIA THE DRIVEWAY.
19:48:40 THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION AND WE ARE AVAILABLE
19:48:42 FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
19:48:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
19:48:46 >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE A QUESTION.
19:48:49 YOU SAID THAT THE FRONT DOOR IS FACING ALBANY, BUT IT
19:48:52 DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN.
19:48:54 CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT A BIT BETTER.
19:48:59 >> SURE, I WILL BRING ALEX RIOS, OUR ARCHITECT AND HAVE
19:49:14 HIM SPEAK TO THAT.
19:49:16 >> ALEX RIOS.
19:49:18 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
19:49:21 THE FRONT DOOR -- SO THERE IS -- TWO DOORS TO EVERY
19:49:21 UNIT.
19:49:25 THE MAIN ENTRANCE, OUR TRADITIONAL MAIN ENTRANCE BUT
19:49:29 ALSO A REAR PATIO, THE SLIDER THAT YOU SEE IN THE
19:49:31 IMAGE.
19:49:35 THAT IS THE -- THAT IS THE ENTRANCE THAT FACES ALBANY.
19:49:37 >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY, THANK YOU.
19:49:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
19:49:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO: CAN YOU PUT THAT UP ON THE OVERHEAD
19:49:44 AND POINT OUT WHERE THESE ENTRANCES ARE?
19:49:46 I AM SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN.
19:50:10 I AM A VISUAL PERSON.
19:50:12 >> YEAH, SO --
19:50:16 >>JOSEPH CITRO: FIRST POINT OUT WHERE ALBANY IS AT.
19:50:17 >> ALBANY IS RIGHT HERE.
19:50:19 >>JOSEPH CITRO: POINT OUT THE ENTRANCES TO THE
19:50:19 BUILDING.
19:50:22 >> WE HAVE A PATIO ENTRANCE HERE AND LET'S SAY A
19:50:24 TRADITIONAL ENTRANCE HERE.
19:50:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS YOU CAN LEAD TO
19:50:31 THE PATIO AND GET TO ALBANY BUT CAN'T WALK OUT YOUR
19:50:33 FRONT DOOR TO GET TO ALBANY.
19:50:36 EXCUSE ME, LET'S ME REPHRASE THAT.
19:50:40 YOU CAN WALK DIRECTLY OUT OF YOUR PATIO TO ALBANY, BUT
19:50:45 YOUR FRONT MAIN ENTRANCE ISN'T DIRECTLY ON ALBANY.
19:50:47 >> DEPENDS ON HOW YOU FINDS ENTRANCE.
19:50:49 I DID SAY "TRADITIONAL ENTRANCE."
19:50:55 THE BACK PATIO WHICH WOULD LEAD -- LIKE A FRONT DOOR.
19:50:58 BUT A SECOND FRONT DOOR IS WHAT I AM SAYING.
19:51:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:51:06 >> IF IT IS BETTER TO FLIP IT -- EXCUSE ME RYAN BASHIM,
19:51:07 THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
19:51:10 IF IT IS BETTER, WE CAN ROTATE THESE SO THAT THE FRONT
19:51:13 DOOR TO YOUR POINT IS FACING ALBANY, NOT THE PATIO
19:51:17 DOOR, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.
19:51:18 >> FLIP IT.
19:51:20 >>LYNN HURTAK: WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS YOU COULD
19:51:24 ACTUALLY -- YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO ROTATE THAT NOW,
19:51:27 BUT THEN MY QUESTION BECOMES, WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT --
19:51:28 TO THOSE GARAGES.
19:51:32 BECAUSE THEN -- THEN IT SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE THREE
19:51:34 DRIVEWAYS.
19:51:36 DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
19:51:37 >> IT DOES.
19:51:41 THE GARAGES WILL STILL -- THEY MAY BE SHIFTED TO THE
19:51:42 -- WHAT DIRECTION IS THAT.
19:51:45 TO THE WEST SIDE AND THE FRONT DOOR WILL BE -- IF YOU
19:51:48 ARE LOOKING AT UNIT -- WHAT IS THAT.
19:51:53 RIGHT THERE -- OH, THERE WE GO.
19:51:56 SO THE FRONT DOOR WILL BASICALLY SHIFT TO WHERE THE
19:51:57 PATIO IS.
19:52:00 >>LYNN HURTAK: SO YOU WOULD JUST -- YOU WOULD JUST
19:52:02 CHANGE THE INTERIOR LAYOUT?
19:52:04 >> CORRECT, YES.
19:52:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
19:52:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU.
19:52:12 I AM NOT WANT TO -- TO REDESIGN FROM THE DAIS.
19:52:16 I DON'T LIKE DOING THAT.
19:52:22 I -- I -- I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE WHOLE SITUATION.
19:52:26 AND I -- I WOULD FEEL IF YOU WANT TO REDESIGN IT
19:52:30 YOURSELF, BECAUSE THIS IS THE SITE PLAN YOU ARE SHOWING
19:52:31 US.
19:52:33 I WOULD SUGGEST ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE AND REDESIGN
19:52:35 IT AND COME BACK.
19:52:38 THAT IS JUST HOW I FEEL, MR. CHAIR.
19:52:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM.
19:52:42 >>LYNN HURTAK: I WOULD BE WILLING TO APPROVE IT WITH
19:52:47 JUST KNOWING THAT THOSE CHANGES WOULD OCCUR.
19:52:50 >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT
19:52:51 COORDINATION.
19:52:54 IF YOU ROTATE THE BUILDING AND CHANGE -- YOU CAN'T MAKE
19:52:56 THE CHANGES BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING.
19:53:00 SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE THAT MORE THAN TWO DEPARTMENTS AND
19:53:03 MY INTERNAL STAFF WILL HAVE TO REVIEW.
19:53:06 I THINK YOU WILL HAVE TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE IF
19:53:06 ANYTHING.
19:53:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
19:53:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I BELIEVE THAT IS WHAT MR. CITRO
19:53:15 WAS REFERRING TO.
19:53:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HUDSON.
19:53:21 >> TYLER HUDSON, 400 ASHLEY DRIVE.
19:53:24 I THINK SOME OF THESE CHANGES CAN BE OUT OF FIRST AND
19:53:28 SECOND READING BUT WITH THE FELLOW PEOPLE ON AGENDA AND
19:53:30 NOT AIR THIS OUT HERE, SOUNDS LIKE A CONTINUANCE WILL
19:53:32 BE IN EVERYONE'S BEST INTEREST.
19:53:35 SO I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE DATES AND FIGURE OUT.
19:53:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
19:53:39 >>BILL CARLSON: I JUST WANT TO SAY THESE KIND OF
19:53:41 DESIGNS ARE ALL OVER THE CITY.
19:53:43 I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS AT ALL.
19:53:46 WE HAVEN'T HEARD FROM ANY FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC
19:53:49 ABOUT -- AND IF THEY HAVE ANY COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL
19:53:52 EVIDENCE OTHERWISE, BUT THESE KIND OF DESIGNS ARE ALL
19:53:54 OVER.
19:53:57 >> LET'S --
19:54:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET'S HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC.
19:54:02 >> I THINK ONE THING I WILL LIKE TO NOTE THE ADDITION
19:54:06 TO THE PERIMETER SIDEWALK THAT WILL CREATE THE
19:54:10 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE FOUR REAR UNIT AND ALBANY.
19:54:12 I DON'T THINK THERE IS ANY CONCERN OF THAT BEING ADDED
19:54:16 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, BUT I WILL BE BACK IN
19:54:17 THE REBUTTAL.
19:54:22 >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST WANT TO SPEAK TO COUNCILMAN
19:54:25 CARLSON'S POINT, AND I AGREE, BUT I ALSO BELIEVE IF YOU
19:54:29 LOOK AT THE FRONTAGES OF THE REST OF THE STREET -- THE
19:54:32 STREETS -- THE HOMES DO FACE THE FRONT.
19:54:36 AND IF IT IS JUST BEING ABLE TO TURN IT, I THINK THAT
19:54:38 WOULD BENEFIT THE STREET AS A WHOLE.
19:54:42 I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE DENSITY.
19:54:45 >> UNDERSTOOD.
19:54:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC
19:55:06 FIRST AND THEN COME BACK.
19:55:09 >> I GUESS WHAT I WOULD ASK FOR -- I KNOW WE NEED TO
19:55:10 GET TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT.
19:55:11 THAT IS IMPORTANT.
19:55:14 IF WE GET A FIRST READING -- IF WE GET THROUGH THIS
19:55:17 FIRST READING AND WE SAY WE ARE GOING TO MAKE THE
19:55:19 CHANGES WE WANT TO MAKE AND WE ARE NOT ABLE TO
19:55:22 ACCOMMODATE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, WE WILL
19:55:25 HAVE TO GO BACK TO DRC -- BACK TO FIRST READING.
19:55:27 WE WILL HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS AND I THINK
19:55:30 WE ARE CONFIDENT ENOUGH THAT THE NUMBER OF DEPARTMENTS
19:55:33 THAT IT WOULD HAVE TO REVIEW THIS GIVEN THE WAY WE CAN
19:55:35 TAYLOR IT WOULD BE TWO OR LESS.
19:55:37 THAT IS THE RULE.
19:55:40 NOT -- NOT SORT OF -- IT IS SCIENCE.
19:55:42 TWO OR MORE AGENCIES HAVE TO REVIEW IT.
19:55:46 BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO ACCOMMODATE THAT CHANGE
19:55:48 WITHOUT ADDITIONAL REVIEW.
19:55:51 SO IT MIGHT BE A GOOD TIME TO START WITH PUBLIC COMMENT
19:55:53 AND I WILL BACK IN REBUTTAL.
19:55:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
19:55:58 ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM,
19:55:59 ITEM NUMBER 11?
19:56:02 YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOU APPROACH THE
19:56:04 LECTERN.
19:56:08 >> I AM DONALD MORROW.
19:56:11 405 SOUTH ALBANY WHICH IS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY.
19:56:15 I LIVED ON ALBANY AVENUE FOR 30 YEARS, SEVEN YEARS IN
19:56:18 THE 407 HOUSE, WHICH I WAS MARRIED IN.
19:56:26 AND 23 YEARS AT 405.
19:56:30 THOSE HOUSES ARE CLOSE TOGETHER.
19:56:34 THEY ARE WANTING TO TRIPLE THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ON
19:56:36 THOSE LOTS.
19:56:39 AS WELL AS TEARING DOWN THOSE STRUCTURES.
19:56:43 THEY ARE SEEKING TO DELAWARE CREASE THE NUMBER OF
19:56:44 AUTOMOBILE -- OR PARKING FOR THE STREET.
19:56:47 THIS STREET ALREADY HAS MANY -- IT IS CONGESTED WITH
19:56:50 PARKED CARS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IT ALREADY
19:56:51 HAS.
19:56:55 THEY ARE LOOKING FOR REDUCTION NOTICE SETBACKS AND THE
19:56:57 CLAIM HAS BEEN MADE THAT SOMEHOW THE OTHER HOUSES
19:57:01 AREN'T MEETING 25, BUT I CAN TELL YOU, AS I CAN SIT ON
19:57:04 MY PORCH AND MEASURE IT AND I HAVE, THAT WE WON'T BE
19:57:08 ABLE TO SEE ANYTHING TO THE SOUTH ONCE THIS TEN-FOOT
19:57:09 SETBACK IS PUT IN.
19:57:13 WE WILL ALSO BE FACING A WALL THAT IS MORE THAN 30 FEET
19:57:16 TALL AND MORE THAN 90 FEET LONG.
19:57:21 SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 2700 AND 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF WALL.
19:57:24 SEVEN FEET FROM MY -- FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
19:57:29 IT WILL, OF COURSE, OBSTRUCT OUR VIEW.
19:57:32 AND IT IS CATACLYSMIC FOR QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE
19:57:33 STREET.
19:57:38 THE IMPERVIOUS AREA ON THE -- ON THE BLOCK IS GOING TO
19:57:40 BE ADVANCED BY 300%.
19:57:44 ALBANY AVENUE FLOODS DURING THE -- DURING THE RAINY
19:57:45 SEASON.
19:57:48 WE KINDS OF CALL IT WITH SOME AFFECTION THE GONDOLA
19:57:50 ROAD, YOU KNOW.
19:57:52 AND THIS IS ONLY GOING TO MAKE IT WORSE.
19:57:54 AND I KNOW IT WILL IMPACT MY PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY
19:57:57 ON THE SOUTH DIRECTLY.
19:58:01 AND CRUCIALLY, THIS DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT ENGAGE THE
19:58:04 STREET OR THE LARGER NEIGHBORHOOD.
19:58:10 YES, WE JUST SAW AN ON HABANA, OFF OF AZEELE OF ONE OF
19:58:14 THOSE, AND IT PERFORMS THE SAME KIND OF TASK.
19:58:15 THERE IS NO CONNECTION TO THE STREET THERE.
19:58:21 JUST THAT DRIVEWAY AND THOSE -- THOSE ENTRANCES.
19:58:24 THIS DESIGN LOOKS INWARD.
19:58:25 IT TURNS ITS BACK ON THE STREET.
19:58:28 IT TURNS ITS SHOULDER TO THE STREET AND SURROUNDING
19:58:30 RESIDENCES.
19:58:32 AND WE HAVE TO SAY, I WILL HAVE TO BE STRAIGHT.
19:58:34 IT IS UGLY.
19:58:37 ESSENTIALLY SEEKING TO COVER AS MUCH GROUND AREA --
19:58:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU STILL HAVE TIME.
19:58:40 YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS.
19:58:41 >> OKAY.
19:58:47 IT ESSENTIALLY COVERS AS MUCH GROUND AREA AND
19:58:51 COMMENSURATE AND BRUTALIST SELF-STORAGE.
19:58:52 THAT IS THE DIAL.
19:58:54 GIANT BOXES OF WHICH MONEY IS SCOOPED.
19:58:57 ONLY A DEVELOP OTHER NEVER LIVED ON THE STREET AND
19:59:01 NEVER WILL COULD FIND IT BEAUTIFUL OR LOVE IT.
19:59:06 I BEG YOU TO DENY REQUEST.
19:59:09 THEIR RATIONALE SEEMS TO BE WE CAN MAKE IT EVEN WORSE,
19:59:12 BUT THIS -- WE ARE GOING TO BE GREAT AND MAKE IT THIS
19:59:14 MUCH WORSE.
19:59:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
19:59:29 >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU HAVE AN AERIAL VIEW OF THIS, THE
19:59:34 NEIGHBORHOOD? MAYBE DR. MORROW COULD JUST TELL US HIS
19:59:40 PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONSISTENCY OR LACK OF CONSISTENCY.
19:59:42 DR. MORROW, IF YOU COULD JUST LOOK AT THE MAP AND TELL US
19:59:54 THE AERIAL MAP, THE OVERHEAD VIEW, AND TELL US THE
19:59:57 NEIGHBORHOOD AS YOU SEE IT, WHETHER THERE'S MORE PROPERTIES
20:00:01 LIKE THE ONES PROPOSED OR MORE PROPERTIES LIKE THE ONES YOU
20:00:04 JUST SHOWED?
20:00:05 >> I'M SORRY, WHAT'S YOUR QUESTION AGAIN?
20:00:09 >>BILL CARLSON: KIND OF START FROM THIS PROPERTY AND WORK
20:00:11 OUTWARDS AND KIND OF SHOW US FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE, A
20:00:15 QUESTION WE HAVE TO ANSWER IS WHETHER THIS PROPOSAL IS
20:00:17 CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:00:19 AND SO FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE, COULD YOU JUST TELL US IN THAT
20:00:22 AREA AROUND THE PROPERTY, FOR EXAMPLE, WHAT PROPERTIES DO
20:00:27 YOU SEE AS HISTORIC VERSUS NEWER DESIGN WITH ADJACENT
20:00:33 PROPERTIES?
20:00:34 >> THE BUNGALOWS BETWEEN THE --
20:00:36 >>BILL CARLSON: IS THERE ANY WAY YOU CAN POINT ON THE MAP,
20:00:39 TOO?
20:00:39 SORRY, IT'S SMALL.
20:00:40 >> BETWEEN THESE FOUR PROPERTIES HERE, AZEELE, AND HORATIO.
20:00:52 >>BILL CARLSON: WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER ONES AROUND THERE?
20:00:57 >> THERE'S ONE ACROSS THE STREET, AND THEN OF COURSE ALL OF
20:01:02 THE PROPERTIES ON THE NEXT BLOCK.
20:01:05 MOST ALL OF THEM ON THE NEXT BLOCK.
20:01:07 >>BILL CARLSON: MOST OF THE HOMES ARE LIKE THE ONES YOU
20:01:09 SHOWED OR ARE MOST OF THEM NEWER HOMES IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD?
20:01:12 >> ACROSS THE STREET, MOST OF THEM ARE NEWER HOMES BUT THEY
20:01:14 ARE NOT SIX-PLEXES.
20:01:16 >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU.
20:01:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HUSAIN.
20:01:27 >> STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING
20:01:30 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:01:32 FOR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD YOU DO HAVE RESIDENTIAL
20:01:35 SEMI-DETACHED, YOU HAVE TOWNHOMES, YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY
20:01:39 HOMES, SO IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT.
20:01:42 ALSO DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF PDs IN THE AREA, IT WAS FOUND
20:01:45 CONSISTENT FOR THAT REASON.
20:01:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:01:49 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
20:01:55 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
20:01:56 >> I'M LISA BRUHNBALM.
20:01:59 GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, MEMBERS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:02:03 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:02:07 MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE LIVED IN THIS 100-YEAR-OLD BUNGALOWS
20:02:13 FOR 30 YEARS AND HAVE SEEN LOTS OF CHANGES.
20:02:15 THE LAST FEW YEARS HAVE BROUGHT US TO THE DECISION TO STAY
20:02:18 ON, AND WE HAVE MADE IMPROVEMENTS INDOORS AND OUT THIS YEAR,
20:02:21 MOST RECENTLY A NEW ROOF, AND EXTERIOR PAINT JOB.
20:02:24 WE LOVE OUR HOME AND CAN'T THINK OF ANYWHERE ELSE WE WOULD
20:02:30 RATHER LIVE.
20:02:30 THE PROPOSED 6-UNIT PROJECT CAME AS A SHOCK TO US JUST A
20:02:34 COUPLE WEEKS AGO SINCE THE NEW OWNER TOLD US LAST YEAR IT
20:02:38 WOULD BE A 4-UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
20:02:40 THE MORE WE LOOKED AT THE SITE PLAN THE WORST IT APPEARS FOR
20:02:42 THE WHOLE BLOCK.
20:02:43 EVEN 2 AND 4 UNIT PLACES ACROSS THE STREET WILL BE DWARFED
20:02:47 BY THESE LOTS OF HOUSING AND RESIDENTS WILL SUFFER FROM
20:02:50 PARKING WOES.
20:02:52 FOR US IT WILL BE THE WORST, BECAUSE WE ARE RIGHT NEXT DOOR.
20:02:55 BUT THERE ARE A DOZEN ISSUES YOU WILL SEE IN THE RECORD, AND
20:02:58 ALL THE LETTERS THAT HAVE COME IN TO YOU, THAT SHOW THIS TO
20:03:02 HAVE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE STREET AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:03:06 DESPITE THE TOWNHOUSES SCATTERED ACROSS MANY OF THE BLOCKS
20:03:09 IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE AREA STILL HAS A HISTORICAL FEEL
20:03:12 THAT MANY HERE CLEARLY VALUE.
20:03:15 SEVERAL NEIGHBORS HAVE TOLD US THAT EVEN THOUGH THEY BOUGHT
20:03:18 NEWER PLACES, THEY BOUGHT ALSO FOR THE FOUR BUNGALOWS.
20:03:23 AS ONE WHO HAD HIS FAVORITES CALLED THEM THE THREE SISTERS.
20:03:28 THESE 1920s ARTS AND CRAFTS HOMES FIRMLY ESTABLISH THE
20:03:32 CHARACTER OF OSCAWANA ON EVERY BLOCK, BEAUTIFUL REMINDERS OF
20:03:36 OUR CITY'S PAST.
20:03:37 NEARLY EVERY ONE OF THEM HAS IN THE LAST FEW YEARS BEEN
20:03:40 SPRUCED UP, AND NOW COUPLES CAN BE SEEN ON OUR STREET WITH
20:03:43 DOGS AND BABY CARRIAGES OR EVEN PEOPLE EXERCISING IN THE
20:03:46 EVENING AND SOMETIMES STOPPING TO CHAT WITH US IF WE ARE ON
20:03:50 THAT FRONT PORCH, WHICH WE OFTEN ARE.
20:03:52 THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURELY WOULDN'T WELCOME HUGE STRUCTURES
20:03:57 JUTTING TOWARD THE SIDEWALK DESTROYING THE GARDENS AND
20:04:01 MATURE TREES ON THE GREEN SPACE.
20:04:05 DURING THE PANDEMIC WE WERE ABLE TO SHARE OUR PRACTICE OF
20:04:08 STARGAZING ON THE BACK DECK AND PATIO WITH FRIENDS WHOSE
20:04:12 FANCY CONDOS TRAPPED THEM INDOORS WITHOUT ACCESS TO THE
20:04:15 NIGHT SKY.
20:04:16 NOW OF COURSE THE 35-FOOT WALL NEXT TO US WILL CAST LIGHT
20:04:20 FROM SECOND FLOOR DINING ROOMS AND THIRD FLOOR BEDROOMS AND
20:04:24 BATHROOMS IN THE EVENING.
20:04:25 THE INTENSE DOSE OF LIGHT POLLUTION DESTROYING ONE OF THE
20:04:28 GREAT ADVANTAGES OF OUR PROPERTY, OUR HOME.
20:04:33 IT'S HEARTBREAKING TO REALIZE THAT JUST AS MY HUSBAND
20:04:35 RETIRES, AND WE HAVE MORE TIME AT HOME, WE COULD HAVE OUR
20:04:40 FIRST YEARS CRUMBLED BY CONSTRUCTION ACROSS TWO LOTS RIGHT
20:04:45 BESIDE US AND SO MANY UNKNOWNS INSTEAD OF THE PEACE.
20:04:50 FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO BE DRIVEN OUT OF TAMPA SO THAT
20:04:53 DEVELOPERS CAN GET RICHER?
20:04:55 THANK YOU.
20:04:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:04:58 NEXT SPEAKER.
20:05:04 YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
20:05:05 >> MY NAME IS DWIGHT WELLS, AND I'M ACTUALLY HERE FOR MY OWN
20:05:12 PROPERTY WHICH IS AT 304 SOUTH ALBANY, BUT I ALSO AM ONE
20:05:16 BLOCK AWAY FROM 407 AND 408 SOUTH ALBANY, AND I BOUGHT MY
20:05:22 BUILDING 30 YEARS AGO, AND I'VE RECENTLY RETIRED, AND THE
20:05:32 PROPOSAL FIRST OF ALL IS OUT OF CHARACTER WITH WHAT HAS BEEN
20:05:39 HYDE PARK.
20:05:41 IT'S WHY IT'S CALLED HISTORIC HYDE PARK.
20:05:45 AND THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON ALBANY HAVE BECOME QUITE
20:05:51 MONUMENTAL IN TERMS OF EVEN THE ABILITY TO WALK OR BIKE,
20:05:56 WHICH MY WIFE AND I BOTH DO SAFELY ON ALBANY AVENUE.
20:06:01 AND I THINK THAT I WOULD URGE THE COUNCIL JUST BY WAY OF
20:06:09 BACKGROUND, I WAS A CITY PLANNER FOR 13 YEARS.
20:06:14 I WAS A COUNTY PLANNER FOR 12 YEARS IN ANOTHER STATE.
20:06:19 AND I DID THIS WORK, AND I HAD TO MAKE TOUGH DECISIONS ABOUT
20:06:25 PROPERTIES THAT WERE -- AND JUST THE FACT THAT THEY ARE
20:06:31 BASICALLY GOING TO PUT A BULLDOZER TO TWO OF THE BEAUTIFUL
20:06:35 HYDE PARK COTTAGES TO START THIS PROJECT, THEY ARE GOING TO
20:06:39 TEAR DOWN -- YOU SHOULD DRIVE OUT THERE.
20:06:44 THEY ARE TWO OF THE NICEST, IN GOOD SHAPE, HYDE PARK
20:06:48 COTTAGES OR ALBANY AVENUE.
20:06:50 THAT'S GOING TO BE THE FIRST THING.
20:06:52 AND SO I WOULD URGE YOU TO -- AND I KNOW YOU WILL --
20:06:57 CONSIDER ALL OF THE RAMIFICATIONS IN THIS.
20:07:02 WE HAVE A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION GOING ON ON OUR STREET.
20:07:09 BUT I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
20:07:11 THANK YOU.
20:07:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:07:13 YES, SIR.
20:07:15 >> [OFF MICROPHONE]
20:07:19 >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION REAL QUICK?
20:07:22 DO YOU KNOW, THIS PROPERTY IN THE HYDE PARK AREA, IS A LOCAL
20:07:25 HISTORIC DISTRICT, IS IT PROTECTED, A NATIONAL HISTORIC
20:07:29 DISTRICT, WHICH IS IDENTIFIED, DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA --
20:07:33 >> WE ARE IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
20:07:37 >>BILL CARLSON: YOU JUST TESTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE A PLANNING
20:07:42 BACKGROUND ALSO.
20:07:43 >> YES, SIR.
20:07:43 >>BILL CARLSON: BUT IS IT A LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT OR NOT?
20:07:46 >> I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S LOCAL.
20:07:48 I KNOW IT'S IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC.
20:07:50 >>BILL CARLSON: IT IS IN THE LOCAL AND THE NATIONAL?
20:07:53 >> YES.
20:07:55 >>BILL CARLSON: BUT IT'S NOT -- BUT THESE ARE NOT
20:07:58 CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES THAT ARE PROTECTED?
20:08:04 CAN YOU COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE?
20:08:07 SORRY.
20:08:07 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:08:11 IT'S IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC, NOT LOCAL.
20:08:14 >>BILL CARLSON: YOU ALL MAY KNOW THIS.
20:08:21 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, IT'S PROTECTED BUT THE NATIONAL
20:08:23 HISTORIC IT'S IDENTIFIED AS HISTORIC, AND HISTORIC HOMES BUT
20:08:28 NOT PROTECTED.
20:08:29 DO YOU KNOW IF IT'S A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE, HUSAIN, OR
20:08:33 NOT?
20:08:38 YOU HAVE TO COME UP TO ANSWER.
20:08:39 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:08:42 REPEAT YOUR QUESTION.
20:08:43 >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU KNOW IF THESE TWO STRUCTURES THAT
20:08:46 ARE GOING TO BE TORN DOWN, ARE THEY CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES?
20:08:49 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: NO, I HAVE TO CHECK WITH OUR HISTORIC
20:08:51 PRESERVATION FOR THAT.
20:08:53 >>BILL CARLSON: IS THAT AN EASY ANSWER?
20:08:56 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: I CAN FIND OUT.
20:08:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:09:00 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
20:09:01 >> MY NAME IS KEN SHEREK.
20:09:10 I LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:09:13 GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
20:09:16 I AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROPOSED REZONING OF 407, 409
20:09:21 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
20:09:24 FOR THE NEXT 3 MINUTES I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE YOU TO BE A
20:09:28 RESIDENT IN THIS 100-YEAR-OLD NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAS BEEN MY
20:09:34 HOME FOR 23 YEARS.
20:09:36 WHEN THE CITY CHANGED THE ZONING FROM SINGLE-FAMILY TO
20:09:40 MULTIFAMILY, THERE WAS NO INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN PRESENTED TO
20:09:45 THE RESIDENTS OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD TO SUPPORT THIS TYPE OF
20:09:47 DEVELOPMENT.
20:09:49 THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT IS TAKING AWAY MOST OF OUR STREET
20:09:57 PARKING.
20:10:00 MANY RESIDENTS USE GARAGES FOR STORAGE WHICH RESULT IN HOME
20:10:07 OWNERS BLOCKING SIDEWALKS AND PARKING ON DRIVEWAYS WHICH IS
20:10:13 ALSO ILLEGAL IN OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. IF THIS TYPE OF
20:10:15 DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES, THE POSSIBILITY OF STREET PARKING
20:10:17 WILL VANISH COMPLETELY AND THE STREET LOAD WILL INCREASE
20:10:24 TREMENDOUSLY.
20:10:25 IT APPEARS THE CITY OF TAMPA IS ONLY MEASURING SQUARE
20:10:28 FOOTAGE OF THE LOT FOR APPROVAL OF REZONING.
20:10:33 NOT THE IMPACT OF THE REZONING IT WILL HAVE ON THE
20:10:37 INFRASTRUCTURE, OUR FLOODING, SEWERS, PLACEMENT OF
20:10:41 SIDEWALKS, AND ALL PARKING.
20:10:47 I SUGGEST THAT WE INVESTIGATE INTO THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
20:10:51 WHERE INFRASTRUCTURE IS ADDRESSED, STREET PARKING IS NOT
20:10:55 ELIMINATED, SIDEWALKS ARE NOT BLOCKED, AND THERE IS NO
20:10:59 PARKING ON PARKWAYS.
20:11:01 NOW, THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNATED DOWN TO ARMENIA AVENUE.
20:11:08 IT'S DOWNTOWN.
20:11:10 WE HAVE PEOPLE PARKING ON PARKWAYS.
20:11:14 BLOCKING SIDEWALKS.
20:11:19 AND RIGHT NOW IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S NOTHING REALLY BAD
20:11:22 HAPPENING, BUT FROM HORATIO AVENUE TO SWANN, IT'S BEEN
20:11:27 OVERDEVELOPED BY THE CITY.
20:11:32 SO RIGHT NOW HYDE PARK COLLECTION, WHICH IS ON WESTLAND AND
20:11:37 ALBANY, THEY HAVE JUST RECENTLY RENOVATING, THEY JUST TURNED
20:11:44 THEM INTO, QUOTE, A CORPORATION THAT'S IN HYDE PARK ALSO
20:11:48 THAT OWNS ALL THESE APARTMENTS.
20:11:53 AND THEY ARE RENOVATING THEM SO IT'S 50% CAPACITY NOW
20:11:57 BECAUSE THEY ARE RENOVATING ALL THE INTERIOR OF THE
20:12:00 BUILDINGS, WHICH IS A GREAT ASSET TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, YET
20:12:04 IT'S SHOWING THAT THERE'S PLENTY OF PARKING, AND THERE
20:12:08 ISN'T.
20:12:10 IN THOSE AREAS.
20:12:10 [BELL SOUNDS]
20:12:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
20:12:14 ANYBODY ELSE?
20:12:19 YES, SIR?
20:12:21 >> MY NAME IS NATHAN HAGAN.
20:12:25 AS YOU KNOW THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE BEING DISPLACED IN
20:12:27 THE CITY OF TAMPA TODAY FACING HOUSING INSECURITY BECAUSE WE
20:12:31 DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH HOUSING.
20:12:33 THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE HERE ARE MOVING HERE REGARDLESS OF
20:12:38 WHETHER THIS GETS BUILT.
20:12:42 WITHOUT THESE FOUR HOMES, FOUR FAMILIES WITH LESS NAMES WILL
20:12:46 BE DISPLACED BECAUSE THE FAMILY THAT WANTS TO LIVE HERE WILL
20:12:49 LIVE SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND IF YOU GO DOWN THE LINE THERE WILL
20:12:52 BE FOUR FEWER HOMES IN OUR COMMUNITY FOR FOUR OF THE POOREST
20:12:59 PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY, LET'S SAY.
20:13:01 AT LEAST 8 FAMILIES WILL BENEFIT BY THESE EXTRA FOUR UNITS
20:13:06 BEING PUT IN.
20:13:07 NONE OF THEM ARE BEING REPRESENTED HERE TONIGHT.
20:13:10 TALK ABOUT PARKING.
20:13:11 AGAIN, STREET PARKING IS A NORMAL THING IN AN URBAN
20:13:15 ENVIRONMENT.
20:13:15 THIS IS THE MOST WALKABLE COMMUNITY IN TAMPA BESIDES WATER
20:13:18 STREET OR CHANNELSIDE.
20:13:21 AND YOU TALK ABOUT THE NINE UNITS THAT WERE ALLOWED UNDER
20:13:25 THE LAND USE, THIS IS ONLY, WHAT, SIX?
20:13:29 THE URBAN FORM IS QUESTIONABLE BUT IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE, THE
20:13:33 ISSUE IS WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, NOT WITH THIS
20:13:36 PROJECT.
20:13:37 OSTENSIBLY, THE REASON IT WAS LAID OUT THIS WAY IS BECAUSE
20:13:41 THEY HAD TO FIT A LOT OF PARKING THERE, AND I AM NOT
20:13:43 SPEAKING FOR THE DEVELOPER BUT I ASSUME THAT THEY WOULD
20:13:45 NEVER MAKE A PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE PARKING.
20:13:52 SO ALSO THIS IS VERY CLOSE TO A GROCERY STORE.
20:13:56 IT'S RIGHT ON HOWARD AVENUE.
20:13:57 IT'S GOT ACCESS TO GREAT TRANSIT.
20:13:59 THE BAYSHORE BOULEVARD AND THE DEDICATED BIKE LANES ARE
20:14:03 RIGHT NEARBY.
20:14:07 THERE'S TONS OF OTHER ONES LIKE THIS.
20:14:10 8 FAMILIES BACKED UP BY THIS HOME BEING BUILT.
20:14:15 THE DOOR PLACEMENT OR THIS, I UNDERSTAND, BUT SAYING THAT
20:14:19 THE FOUR FAMILIES CAN'T MOVE IN HERE, I THINK IT'S
20:14:23 DETRIMENTAL TO OUR COMMUNITY.
20:14:25 SO I SUPPORT THIS PROJECT.
20:14:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:14:28 WE ALSO HAVE REGISTERED -- NOBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC -- A
20:14:32 SCOTT JOHNSON.
20:14:34 >>THE CLERK: HE IS NOT LOGGED ON.
20:14:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOT LOGGED ON.
20:14:37 OKAY.
20:14:37 ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT?
20:14:38 IF NOT, THE GENTLEMAN, MR. HUDSON.
20:14:41 >>TYLER HUDSON: THE NEIGHBORS THAT YOU HEARD FROM LOVE
20:14:54 THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT'S A GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:14:56 IT'S A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO CALL
20:14:58 HOME.
20:14:59 AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANTICIPATES
20:15:03 FOR THIS PIECE OF LAND.
20:15:05 UP TO NINE HOMES.
20:15:08 INCREASE OF SEVEN.
20:15:09 WE ARE ASKING FOR SIX.
20:15:11 WE THINK THAT THIS CONFIGURATION, WITH THIS DENSITY, IS
20:15:16 REASONABLE.
20:15:17 THESE WAIVERS ARE AMPLY SUPPORT BY THE JUSTIFICATIONS THAT
20:15:20 WE HAVE PUT INTO THE RECORD.
20:15:24 WE HAVE A CONSISTENCY FINDING FROM YOUR STAFF WHICH I CAN
20:15:27 TELL YOU IS NOT ALWAYS AN EASY THING TO GET.
20:15:29 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INCONSISTENCY FINDING IT WAS
20:15:32 BASED ON TWO CIRCUMSTANCES.
20:15:34 THE FIRST WAS A LACK OF PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WITH THE REAR
20:15:37 UNITS TO THE SIDEWALK ON ALBANY, WE CAN FIX THAT BETWEEN
20:15:42 FIRST AND SECOND READING WITHOUT ISSUE.
20:15:43 THE FIRST ISSUE OF THE FRONTAGES AFTER CONSIDERING AND
20:15:46 READING THE CODE, I AM HIGHLY CONFIDENT THAT THE
20:15:49 REORIENTATION OF THE DOORS ON A STRUCTURE WILL NOT
20:15:52 FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE SHAPE IS LIKEWISE AN ACCOMMODATION THAT
20:15:56 COULD BE PROCESSED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
20:15:58 AND IF THAT IS NOT THE CASE THEN WE WILL ALL BE RIGHT BACK
20:16:01 HERE.
20:16:01 I WANT TO TOUCH ON TWO BRIEF ISSUES THAT WERE RAISED IN
20:16:04 OPPOSITION REGARDING THE HISTORIC NATURE.
20:16:06 THIS IS IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
20:16:10 IT IS NOT IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
20:16:13 THE CERTIFICATE IS ON SIRE.
20:16:19 THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS OUTSIDE THE
20:16:23 SCOPE OF THIS REZONING.
20:16:25 THERE ARE A TRUCK LOAD OF STATE LAWS REGARDING CONCURRENCY,
20:16:30 IMPACT FEES, THINGS LIKE THAT, AND WE DO HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE
20:16:34 NEEDS THROUGHOUT THIS COMMUNITY, BUT THAT'S NOT REALLY THE
20:16:37 SUBJECT OF THIS HEARING BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.
20:16:38 I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND PATIENCE AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK
20:16:41 THAT YOU APPROVE THIS TONIGHT.
20:16:43 THANK YOU.
20:16:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:16:44 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
20:16:49 COUNCILMAN HURTAK.
20:16:50 >>LYNN HURTAK: IT'S DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE
20:16:54 PLACE.
20:16:56 I AM NEW HERE SO LET ME KNOW IF I AM GOING TOO FAR.
20:16:59 I THINK ANOTHER ISSUE THAT THE RESIDENTS RAISED IS THE
20:17:03 DESIGN, A LITTLE INCONSISTENT WITH EVEN THE NEW TOWNHOMES
20:17:09 THAT WE SAW PICTURES OF.
20:17:11 CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT?
20:17:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN, I BELIEVE IN TERMS OF SIZE, MASS
20:17:21 AND SCALE AND THE LIKE, THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.
20:17:23 BUT THE PARTICULAR DESIGN, I BELIEVE THAT WOULD NOT BE YOUR
20:17:30 PURVIEW TO BE ABLE TO ASK IT BE REDESIGNED, THE DESIGN
20:17:36 ELEMENTS.
20:17:36 BUT THE SITE PLAN CONTROLS.
20:17:39 AND THAT'S WHY I ASK YOU FOCUS ON THE CRITERIA OF THE CODE
20:17:44 AND APPLY THE FACTS AS YOU HAVE THEM TO THE CODE AS IS
20:17:47 PRESENTED TO YOU AND MAKE FINDINGS AND THE FACTS THAT ARE
20:17:52 CONSISTENT.
20:17:52 >>CATE WELLS: CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE RECORD.
20:17:55 JUST TO BRIEFLY RESPOND TO THAT, WHILE THIS PROPERTY IS
20:18:00 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT AND IT WOULD
20:18:02 NOT GO THROUGH THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS REVIEW, I
20:18:06 THINK WITH RESPECT TO HOW THE BUILDING ENGAGES WITH THE
20:18:09 STREET IS APPROPRIATELY BEFORE THIS COUNCIL FOR
20:18:11 CONSIDERATION, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
20:18:15 THE DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE NOT PART OF THE BUILDING, THAT IS
20:18:18 WITHIN COUNCIL'S PURVIEW.
20:18:20 I THINK THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THE POLICY IN THE
20:18:23 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH REGARD TO HAVING FRONT-FACING
20:18:27 UNITS.
20:18:27 AND HOW THAT ENGAGES THE STREETS.
20:18:29 I THINK THAT PORTION OF THE PROJECT BEFORE YOU IS
20:18:34 APPROPRIATE FOR CONSIDERATION.
20:18:36 THANK YOU.
20:18:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:18:40 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
20:18:41 YES, MA'AM.
20:18:41 >> I WAS GOING TO SAY CAN YOU SPEAK TO FRONTAGE?
20:18:52 >>TYLER HUDSON: SURE.
20:18:54 THE ARCHITECT.
20:18:55 >> SURE.
20:18:56 THE QUESTION IS WITH REGARDS TO THE --
20:18:59 >>LYNN HURTAK: HOW IS IT GOING TO ORIENT THE STREET AND FIT
20:19:02 IN?
20:19:03 I MEAN, WE TALKED ABOUT THE FRONTAGE BUT HOW IS IT GOING
20:19:06 TO -- WITH THE REST OF THE STREET?
20:19:10 >> SURE.
20:19:11 I THINK IT'S A PRECEDENT FROM OTHER EXAMPLES IN THE
20:19:14 NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:19:14 THERE WAS ONE EXAMPLE ON THE FIRST IMAGE.
20:19:18 THERE IS ALSO A BUILDING RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET WITH
20:19:21 SIMILAR AESTHETIC.
20:19:23 AS FAR AS ADDRESSING THE ENTRANCE, I PERSONALLY WOULD WANT
20:19:27 THE SLIDERS FACING ALBANY, SINGLE SWING DOOR FACING IN
20:19:34 VERSUS A SLIDING DOOR WITH A PATIO WOULD MAYBE ARE MORE
20:19:39 APPEALING.
20:19:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE?
20:19:45 IS THERE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
20:19:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL.
20:19:54 COUNCIL, I WOULD JUST ASK, MR. CHAIRMAN, IF YOU COULD JUST
20:19:57 ASK QUESTIONS BE MADE BEFORE THE APPLICANT HAS THE LAST
20:19:59 WORD.
20:20:00 SO AFTER HIS PRESENTATION --
20:20:04 >>> YOU STILL HAVE REBUTTAL.
20:20:06 >> OKAY.
20:20:07 I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IF THERE IS A MOTION BROUGHT
20:20:10 FORWARD THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT THE REVISION SHEET INCLUDES
20:20:13 THE ADDITION OF THE PERIMETER, PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS, AND
20:20:18 ALSO THE ORIENTATION OF THE ALBANY FRONTING BUILDINGS TO
20:20:24 HAVE THE FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS MENTIONED IN THE PLANNING
20:20:26 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT.
20:20:28 I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT DIDN'T GET LOST IN THE
20:20:31 SHUFFLE.
20:20:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY, ANYTHING ELSE?
20:20:33 IS THERE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
20:20:36 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
20:20:38 SECOND?
20:20:41 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
20:20:42 ALL IN FAVOR?
20:20:45 AYE.
20:20:45 ANY OPPOSED?
20:20:46 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
20:20:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, I WILL RATTLE OFF THE REASONS
20:20:53 WHY I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS.
20:20:54 SO IN THE INTEREST OF SAVING TIME, I WOULD RATHER PASS IT ON
20:20:57 TO A PERSON THAT IS GOING TO SUPPORT IT, AND THEN I WILL
20:21:02 HAVE MY VOTE.
20:21:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO READ ITEM NUMBER
20:21:06 11?
20:21:07 COUNCILMAN VIERA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ NUMBER 11?
20:21:11 ANYBODY?
20:21:11 >>LUIS VIERA: I CAN READ IT, SURE.
20:21:17 I CAN READ IT, MR. CHAIRMAN.
20:21:18 I MOVE AN ORDINANCE -- SORRY, SIR?
20:21:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD.
20:21:25 >>LUIS VIERA: I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST
20:21:27 READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
20:21:30 GENERAL VICINITY OF 407 AND 409 SOUTH ALBANY IN THE CITY OF
20:21:34 TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
20:21:37 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL
20:21:40 MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
20:21:43 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND SEMI-DETACHED PROVIDING AN
20:21:46 EFFECTIVE DATE.
20:21:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
20:21:49 YES, SIR?
20:21:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL POINTS THAT YOU
20:21:52 WOULD --
20:21:53 >>LUIS VIERA: OH, YEAH.
20:21:54 AND I WROTE THIS DOWN.
20:21:56 I DIDN'T GET ALL THE REQUESTED ADDITIONS INCLUDING THE
20:21:59 ORIENTATION OF ALBANY IN THE CONDITIONS, AND MR. HUDSON HAD
20:22:03 MENTIONED SOMETHING ELSE BUT I COULDN'T WRITE IT DOWN.
20:22:08 THE ADDITIONAL STATEMENT BY MR. HUDSON THAT WERE MENTIONED.
20:22:13 I DON'T WANT TO HAVE TO REOPEN, IF ANYBODY REMEMBERS THAT, I
20:22:17 COULDN'T WRITE IT DOWN.
20:22:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO THE REVISION SHEET, THE
20:22:21 REVISED REVISION SHEET.
20:22:25 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:22:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO WHAT MR. HUDSON SUGGESTED
20:22:30 ALSO BE INCLUDED WITH THAT?
20:22:33 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
20:22:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DOES THAT HAVE TO BE MADE CLEAR FOR THE
20:22:36 RECORD, MR. HUSAIN?
20:22:38 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:22:44 CORRECT.
20:22:45 SO THE REVISION SHEET WE WOULD WANT FOR THE RECORD.
20:22:49 THE UPDATED ONE.
20:22:50 >> TWO ADDITIONAL ITEMS, PLEASE.
20:22:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND WE ARE CLEAR FOR THE RECORD OF WHAT
20:22:57 THOSE ARE?
20:22:59 >> FOR THE RECORD.
20:23:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
20:23:03 DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
20:23:04 >>LYNN HURTAK: I'LL SECOND IT.
20:23:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN
20:23:11 HURTAK.
20:23:12 ROLL CALL VOTE.
20:23:13 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
20:23:15 >>BILL CARLSON: NO.
20:23:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
20:23:19 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
20:23:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.
20:23:22 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
20:23:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO.
20:23:25 >>THE CLERK: MOTION FAILED WITH CARLSON, MANISCALCO, CITRO
20:23:28 AND GUDES VOTING NO.
20:23:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
20:23:31 DO WE HAVE ANOTHER MOTION?
20:23:35 YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN CITRO.
20:23:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY PLEASE.
20:23:39 REZ 22-19, PETITIONER DID NOT MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF
20:23:50 AND -- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PROPOSED REZONING IS
20:23:55 INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 WHICH IS
20:23:59 ENCOURAGING THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
20:24:02 PROJECTS TO INCLUDE THE ORIENTATION FROM FRONT DOOR TO
20:24:06 SIDEWALKS AND THE FAILURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
20:24:10 27-136, THE PURPOSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT SHOWN ON THE SITE
20:24:13 PLAN DOES NOT PROMOTE OR ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
20:24:17 APPROPRIATE IN THE LOCATION, CHARACTER, OR COMPATIBILITY
20:24:19 WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:24:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DID YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS
20:24:25 THE ISSUE OF THE WAIVERS OR NOT?
20:24:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO I WOULD.
20:24:31 DESIGN WAIVERS DO NOT NECESSARILY SUPPORT THE FACT THAT THE
20:24:33 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE AND IS
20:24:37 NOT -- EXCUSE ME -- WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
20:24:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER
20:24:46 CARLSON.
20:24:47 ROLL CALL.
20:24:47 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
20:24:50 >>LUIS VIERA: NO.
20:24:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
20:24:54 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.
20:24:56 >>LYNN HURTAK: NO.
20:24:59 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
20:25:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
20:25:03 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA, MIRANDA AND HURTAK
20:25:09 VOTING NO.
20:25:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:25:11 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
20:25:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE WANT TO TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE
20:25:16 RECESS?
20:25:17 LET'S TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS.
20:27:29 (MEETING IN RECESS)
20:28:46
20:35:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I CALL CITY COUNCIL BACK TO ORDER.
20:35:53 >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
20:35:54 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
20:35:55 >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
20:35:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
20:35:58 >>LUIS VIERA: HERE.
20:36:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE.
20:36:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
20:36:03 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
20:36:04 >> THANK YOU.
20:36:04 NUMBER 12.
20:36:05 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12, REZ 22-20.
20:36:13 THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 306 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
20:36:16 PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS 16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD
20:36:21 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
20:36:24 ON THE LINE WE HAVE DANNY COLLINS.
20:36:31 >>DANNY COLLINS: I'M HERE.
20:36:35 MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
20:36:38 >>THE CLERK: DANNY, DO YOU SEE THE LINK?
20:36:52 >>DANNY COLLINS: I DON'T SEE THE LINK TO SHARE MY SCREEN.
20:37:07 CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN?
20:37:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE DON'T SEE IT YET.
20:37:37 NOW?
20:37:38 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR.
20:37:40 >>DANNY COLLINS: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
20:37:41 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
20:37:42 THE NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,
20:37:45 MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE SOUTH HOWARD NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:37:48 HYDE PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATION FACILITY LOCATED WILLIAM
20:37:51 FOUR BLOCKS FROM THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
20:37:54 CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED ONE BLOCK EAST OF THE SITE
20:37:57 AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEATHER PLATT STREET, SOUTH MELVILLE
20:38:01 AVENUE, SUBJECT SITE IN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
20:38:08 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SURROUNDING
20:38:11 PROPERTIES.
20:38:11 YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE SOUTH OF WEST PLATT STREET AND
20:38:15 ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST AZEELE STREET.
20:38:19 PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL USES AROUND THE SUBJECT SITE, ON
20:38:22 THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PLATT STREET, RESIDENTIAL USES
20:38:26 LOCATED ALONG WEST PLATT STREET, SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE,
20:38:31 APPROXIMATELY FOUR BLOCKS TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
20:38:34 WHICH IS PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
20:38:40 HERE IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
20:38:41 THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY IN RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND
20:38:46 USE DESIGNATION.
20:38:48 R-35 IS TO THE EAST, SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, TO THE
20:38:53 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE PARCELS DESIGNATED CMU-35,
20:39:00 CMU-35 THE PREDOMINANT LAND USE CATEGORY ALONG THIS PORTION
20:39:04 OF WEST PLATT STREET, ALSO ALONG SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE.
20:39:10 SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION,
20:39:15 SUBJECT SITE WOULD BE A DEVELOPED WITH -- PER ACRE WITH I IS
20:39:20 CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE
20:39:22 DESIGNATION.
20:39:23 WHILE THE PROPOSED USE AND DENSITY ARE CONSISTENT WITH
20:39:26 UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE THE REQUEST IS INCONSISTENT WITH
20:39:28 LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6, SITE PROPOSES TWO OF THE UNITS FRONT
20:39:34 DOORS AND GARAGES TO FACE IMPROVED ALLEYWAY EAST OF SOUTH
20:39:39 ALBANY AVENUE.
20:39:40 THE REMAINING TWO UNITS WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED TO FACE SOUTH
20:39:43 ALBANY AVENUE, WITH A SIDEWALK.
20:39:47 CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
20:39:49 OF SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROJECTS TO INCLUDE ORIENTATION.
20:39:56 FRONT DOOR, SIDEWALK AND STREET, PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN
20:39:58 CONNECTIONS TO SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
20:40:01 PROPOSED SITE PLAN DOES NOT MEET POLICY DIRECTION OF THE
20:40:03 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:40:05 IT ALSO PRESENTS A SAFETY CONCERN FOR RESIDENTS OF THOSE
20:40:09 UNITS.
20:40:10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOGNIZES THE ROLE OF ALLEYWAYS
20:40:14 IN CITY'S NEIGHBORHOODS, THESE ALLEYS PROVIDE NEIGHBORHOOD
20:40:17 CONNECTIVITY, GARBAGE PICKUP, FIRE RESCUE SERVICE, AND
20:40:24 SERVES A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND IS NOT MEANT TO BE USED AS A
20:40:28 MAIN ENTRANCE FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
20:40:29 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE --
20:40:33 RESIDENTIAL USE FACING THE ALLEYWAY.
20:40:36 DUE TO THE SITE LAYOUT, POLICY REDUCTION OF THE
20:40:41 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS PLANNING
20:40:42 COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE
20:40:45 CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
20:40:47 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
20:40:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:40:51 ANY QUESTIONS?
20:40:55 >>LYNN HURTAK: I KNOW YOU FIND IT INCONSISTENT, BUT DOESN'T
20:40:59 THIS AREA HAVE A LOT OF GARAGE APARTMENTS THAT ACTUALLY DO
20:41:03 HAVE AN ENTRANCE ONTO THE ALLEYWAY?
20:41:11 >>DANNY COLLINS: THERE ARE ACCESSORY UNITS THAT COULD HAVE
20:41:16 UNITS THAT ORIENT TOWARDS THE ALLEYWAY.
20:41:20 HOWEVER, LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 REQUIRES ENTRANCES TO ORIENT
20:41:30 TOWARDS THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND STREET.
20:41:33 IN THIS CASE IT WOULD NOT.
20:41:36 ALSO, THERE IS NO ACCESS -- THERE IS NO SAFE -- THERE IS NO
20:41:41 ACCESS FOR RESIDENTS TO GET TO SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
20:41:46 THEY WOULD HAVE TO WALK OUT INTO THE ALLEY WHICH POSES A
20:41:49 SAFETY CONCERN.
20:41:50 >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY, THANK YOU.
20:41:53 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANKS VERY MUCH.
20:41:54 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
20:41:56 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
20:41:58 CASE REZ 22-20, THE REPRESENTATIVE IS SIMON AMESBURY AND
20:42:06 RUSSELL OTTENBERG, LOCATED AT 306 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE.
20:42:15 SO THE PROPERTY HERE IS CURRENTLY ZONED RM-16 RESIDENTIAL
20:42:19 MULTIFAMILY 16 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
20:42:22 MULTIFAMILY.
20:42:24 THERE ARE THREE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED, ONE AS DANNY WAS
20:42:29 REFERRING TO, TWO EASTERN UNITS FACING AN ALLEY.
20:42:33 SECOND IS FOR AN AISLE WIDTH, TRANSPORTATION.
20:42:37 AND A THIRD IS FOR REDUCTION IN GREEN SPACE, NATURAL
20:42:39 RESOURCES.
20:42:43 YOU SEE THE PARCEL HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
20:42:47 THIS IS TO ALLOW FOR FOUR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
20:42:50 THE TOTAL LOT AREA CONTAINS 6,140 SQUARE FEET OR .14 ACRES.
20:42:57 THE BUILDING ITSELF WILL HAVE A TOTAL GROSS AREA OF 9,452
20:43:04 SQUARE FEET.
20:43:06 THE PROPOSED PARKING IS 9 PARKING SPACES, AND THEY MEET THE
20:43:12 REQUIREMENT OF 9 PARKING SPACES.
20:43:16 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
20:43:19 TO THE NORTH OF THE PARCEL IS PD WITH RESIDENTIAL
20:43:23 SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:43:24 PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED RM-16 DEVELOPED WITH
20:43:28 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
20:43:29 TO THE WEST ZONED PD WITH TOWNHOMES.
20:43:32 AND TO THE EAST, THE PARCEL IS RM-16 WITH RESIDENTIAL
20:43:36 SINGLE-FAMILY ON THE LOT.
20:43:39 THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING WILL BE THREE FLOORS AT
20:43:43 35 FEET.
20:43:45 ACCESS TO THE SITE IS FROM SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE AND ALSO AN
20:43:49 ALLEYWAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WHICH I WILL SHOW
20:43:51 YOU ON THE SITE PLAN.
20:44:04 OVERHEAD VIEW.
20:44:05 YOU WILL SEE THE FOUR UNITS.
20:44:08 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
20:44:11 AND THEN YOU WILL SEE THE ALLEYWAY.
20:44:17 ALBANY AVENUE TO THE WEST.
20:44:22 AS WE GET TO THE ELEVATION, ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH, AND THE
20:44:28 WEST SIDE.
20:44:34 AROUND TO THE PROPERTY YOU WILL SEE WHAT THE CURRENT STATE
20:44:41 IS.
20:44:44 TO THE WEST TOWNHOMES.
20:44:52 A LITTLE BIT TO THE NORTH YOU WILL SEE OFFICE SPACE.
20:44:55 AND TO THE NORTH CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY YOU WILL SEE ALL
20:44:59 RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
20:45:04 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FIND THE OVERALL
20:45:06 REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT
20:45:08 CODE.
20:45:09 SUBJECT TO TRANSPORTATION WAIVER, PLANNING COMMISSION
20:45:13 MEETING WAIVER, AND NATURAL RESOURCES MEETING WAIVER.
20:45:16 ALSO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS FOUND IT INCONSISTENT AND THE
20:45:20 APPLICANT IF APPROVED WILL HAVE TO FIX THEIR NEEDS BETWEEN
20:45:23 FIRST AND SECOND READING ALSO.
20:45:25 ON THAT PART, I AM HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
20:45:28 >> ZAIN, I AM GOING TO ASK YOU A QUESTION.
20:45:34 THE SITE PLANS, CAN YOU PUT THAT BACK UP AS FAR AS THE
20:45:36 STORAGE UNITS AND THE PARKING?
20:45:42 NOW, CAN YOU BLOW THAT UP SO THAT I CAN SEE THE FOUR PARKING
20:45:46 SPACES TO THE REAR OF THE ALLEYWAY?
20:45:48 I HAVE THE LUXURY OF HAVING IT IN FRONT OF ME HERE, BUT WANT
20:45:51 TO POINT SOMETHING OUT.
20:45:53 THANKS VERY MUCH, ZAIN.
20:45:55 THE APRON FOR THE PROPERTY IN THE REAR FOR FOUR CARS, IS
20:46:02 THAT EXTENDING THE APRON?
20:46:03 IS THAT EXTENDING INTO THE ALLEYWAY?
20:46:06 AS IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN?
20:46:09 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: WE HAVE TRANSPORTATION JONATHAN SCOTT ON THE
20:46:13 LINE.
20:46:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WILL ASK JONATHAN.
20:46:15 THANK YOU.
20:46:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
20:46:25 NO?
20:46:25 ALL RIGHT.
20:46:25 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: JONATHAN SCOTT IS ON THE LINE.
20:46:36 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
20:46:39 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
20:46:42 THE CONNECTIONS TO THE ALLEY, THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE ASKING?
20:46:48 >> WERE YOU SWORN IN?
20:46:49 >> YES, I WAS SWORN IN.
20:46:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: JONATHAN, SO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THE APRON
20:46:55 IS EXTENDED TO THE ALLEYWAY? IS THAT WHAT YOU JUST SAID?
20:46:59 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES.
20:47:00 SO THE DRIVEWAY ON THE ALLEY DOES TIE INTO THE ALLEY IN THE
20:47:05 BACK.
20:47:05 IT DOES FLAIR INTO IT.
20:47:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DO YOU KNOW HOW FAR IT GOES INTO THE ALLEY?
20:47:12 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: RIGHT INTO IT.
20:47:13 THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY THEY NEED A BACKUP WAIVER.
20:47:18 THAT'S THE WAIVER.
20:47:20 THE WAIVER OF THE PARKING SPACES, THAT'S THE ONLY WAIVER
20:47:23 THEY NEED, BUT AT LEAST THEY CAN GET CARS PARKED THERE.
20:47:27 THEY HAVE ENOUGH WIDTH, THE DRIVEWAY.
20:47:31 I WAS WORKING WITH THEM ON THIS ONE.
20:47:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, JONATHAN.
20:47:35 >> RUSSELL OTTENBERG, 3737 LAKE JOYCE DRIVE, LAND O' LAKES,
20:47:40 FLORIDA.
20:47:41 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
20:47:42 BEFORE I START, I WOULD LIKE TO ENTER A COUPLE DOCUMENTS
20:47:45 INTO THE RECORD.
20:47:53 I THINK I HAVE ONE MORE.
20:47:55 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU WANT TO STATE WHAT THEY ARE?
20:47:57 >> CERTAINLY.
20:47:58 WHAT I JUST HANDED IN WAS A SIGN-IN SHEET AND A PHOTO OF A
20:48:04 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.
20:48:09 [OFF MICROPHONE]
20:48:11 FOR THE ALLEY.
20:48:13 SHOWING THAT CARS CAN PULL IN AND MAKE THAT MANEUVER.
20:48:22 AS TOLD YOU, THIS IS AN APPLICATION TO REZONE RM-16 TO PD TO
20:48:30 ALLOW FOUR TOWNHOMES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
20:48:37 THIS PD DOES REQUIRE THROW WAIVERS AS HAS BEEN NOTED BY
20:48:40 STAFF.
20:48:41 I WILL GET INTO THOSE IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL IN A MOMENT.
20:48:45 I DO WANT TO SHOW -- AND THIS IS IN THE INFORMATION THAT WE
20:48:51 SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION.
20:48:59 >> PUT IT ON TOP.
20:49:02 >> SO THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THE SITE IS
20:49:14 OUTLINED IN RED HERE.
20:49:16 AND I HAVE IDENTIFIED THE GREEN SHADING.
20:49:20 ALL OF THE PROPERTIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT ARE
20:49:23 TOWNHOMES, CONDOS, OR OTHER MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS.
20:49:28 AND AS YOU CAN SEE, QUITE A BIT OF THEM ARE THAT.
20:49:33 THERE ARE NOT QUITE AS MANY SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE
20:49:36 NEIGHBORHOOD AS THERE ARE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS.
20:49:39 A LOT OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS -- AND I WILL GET INTO THIS, THE
20:49:45 SPECIFIC WAIVERS -- HAVE UNITS THAT ACCESS DIRECTLY TO
20:49:48 ALLEYS, AND THAT ACCESS TO ALLEYS WITH LESS THAN 24 FEET OF
20:49:57 PAVEMENT, WHICH IS ALSO ONE OF THE WAIVERS.
20:50:00 SO YOU CAN SEE THAT, FOR EXAMPLE, AND I CHECKED SOME OF
20:50:05 THESE OFF -- THIS IS A UNIT THAT ACCESSES THE ALLEY.
20:50:11 THESE TWO UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:14 ALL OF THESE UNITS DOWN HERE ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:17 THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:19 THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:21 ALL OF THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:24 ALL OF THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:26 THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:28 AND THESE UNITS ACCESS THE ALLEY.
20:50:30 SO AS FAR AS THE WAIVER TO ACCESSING THE ALLEY, WHAT WE ARE
20:50:38 REQUESTING IS ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TREND
20:50:41 IN THE AREA.
20:50:44 WITH RESPECT TO HAVING THE FRONT DOORS ON AN ALLEY, THOSE
20:50:49 UNITS HAVE THEIR FRONT DOORS ON THE ALLEY, OR MANY OF THEM
20:50:52 DO, NOT ALL OF THEM, BUT MANY OF THEM DO.
20:50:54 AND SO THAT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING,
20:50:59 IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH DID DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN THE AREA.
20:51:04 SO WE HAVE A THIRD WAIVER, WHICH IS TO THE OVERALL GREEN
20:51:10 SPACE PER UNIT, AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE
20:51:16 350 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT, AND THAT WOULD REQUIRE 1400 SQUARE
20:51:20 FEET.
20:51:21 WE ARE PROPOSING ROUGHLY 310 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
20:51:26 NOW, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET AT 305 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE
20:51:33 IN ONE OF THE PHOTOS THAT ZAIN HAD SHOWN YOU, YOU SAW FOUR
20:51:39 TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENTS.
20:51:40 SO DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET, RIGHT HERE, IS A FOUR TOWN
20:51:48 HOME DEVELOPMENT ON A LOT THE SAME SIZE THAT WAS APPROVED
20:51:54 VIA PD THAT HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO AN ALLEY TO THE FRONT DOOR,
20:52:00 HAS THEIR DRIVEWAYS ON THE ALLEY, ALSO A REDUCTION IN SQUARE
20:52:09 FOOTAGE FROM 350 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT TO 300 SQUARE FEET AND
20:52:13 THAT WAIVER WAS APPROVED.
20:52:16 AND THEY ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO PUT IN A FIRE SPRINKLER
20:52:20 SYSTEM, WHICH IS ONE OF THE COMMENTS THAT FIRE REVIEW HAD
20:52:25 FOR US.
20:52:26 AND WE HAVE ACTUALLY ALREADY ADDRESSED THAT IN OUR MOST
20:52:29 RECENT SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
20:52:32 ONE OF THE NOTES STATES THE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM THAT
20:52:37 WOULD BE USED IN THOSE.
20:52:40 SO WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING HERE IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS
20:52:49 WHAT IS GOING ON THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:52:53 WE ARE NOT SUBSTANTIALLY OR MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE
20:52:56 OTHER TOWNHOMES, CONDOS AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT
20:53:01 ARE IN THE AREA.
20:53:12 AS I SAID A LITTLE EARLIER, WE ALSO HAD A NEIGHBORHOOD
20:53:14 MEETING TWO NIGHTS AGO THAT WAS -- THE NEIGHBORS WERE
20:53:19 INVITED A WEEK PRIOR, AND SET UP RIGHT IN THE FRONT YARD OF
20:53:28 306, RIGHT HERE.
20:53:31 WE HAD A TOTAL OF THREE PEOPLE SHOW UP.
20:53:35 THEY ALL SIGNED IN.
20:53:36 AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY ALL ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS
20:53:41 PETITION.
20:53:44 AND SO IN ADDITION TO THAT, AS WE HAVE TWO GENERAL
20:53:51 CATEGORIES OF THINGS GOING ON HERE.
20:53:54 WE HAVE THE USE ITSELF IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE AND I
20:53:59 THINK PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF HAVE SAID THAT IT
20:54:02 IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE.
20:54:04 THEN WE HAVE SOME TECHNICAL INCONSISTENCIES.
20:54:09 I DISCUSSED THE ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY, THE ALLEY WIDTH, AND
20:54:14 THEN THE REDUCTION IN GREEN SPACE.
20:54:17 THERE ARE SOME OTHER TECHNICAL INCONSISTENCIES WITH RESPECT
20:54:19 TO -- WITH RESPECT TO THE TREE THAT STRADDLES THE PROPERTY
20:54:25 LINE, AND FIRE.
20:54:28 AND THOSE ARE ADDRESSED IN THE REVISION SHEET, THE UPDATED
20:54:34 REVISION SHEET THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED.
20:54:37 WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH ALL OF THOSE.
20:54:38 WE ARE GOING TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES.
20:54:41 THOSE WILL REMEDY THE INCONSISTENCIES.
20:54:44 AND SO WE FEEL THAT WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO DO HERE IS
20:54:50 CONSISTENT, COMPATIBLE, IT IS A USE THAT IS -- AND A
20:54:55 DEVELOPMENT OF COMPARABLE SCALE AND SCOPE AS OTHER
20:54:59 MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
20:55:08 THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOUR-UNIT TOWN HOME DIRECTLY ACROSS
20:55:11 THE STREET IS -- WE ARE BASICALLY A MIRROR IMAGE OF THAT IN
20:55:16 TERMS OF THE USE AND THE WAIVERS REQUESTED.
20:55:20 SO WE ARE MATERIALLY THE SAME AS THAT.
20:55:27 HERE IS ANOTHER FACT, A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM SOME OF THE
20:55:36 OTHER PETITIONS YOU HEARD TONIGHT.
20:55:40 THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER, WHO IS A DEVELOPER, IS GOING TO
20:55:43 LIVE IN ONE OF THESE UNITS.
20:55:45 SO ONLY THREE OF THEM ARE GOING TO BE SOLD TO OTHER PEOPLE.
20:55:49 SHE LIVES THERE NOW, SHE WANTS THIS TO BE A FIRST-CLASS
20:55:52 DEVELOPMENT.
20:55:54 AND WE SUBMITTED ELEVATIONS, BUT THEY REALLY DON'T SHOW WHAT
20:55:59 THE QUALITY OF THE UNITS ARE.
20:56:04 AND THIS IS A BETTER REPRESENTATION OF WHAT THAT'S GOING TO
20:56:07 LOOK LIKE.
20:56:10 AS HAS BEEN NOTED IN MANY OF THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS, THERE IS
20:56:15 A NEED FOR HOUSING IN THIS AREA, AND SO GIVEN ALL OF THE
20:56:22 ABOVE, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST APPROVAL OF THIS PD.
20:56:26 I AM HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
20:56:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU.
20:56:31 I AM JUST CURIOUS, SAYING THAT THE PRESENTATION IS FLAWED,
20:56:37 BUT WHEN I HEAR THE WORD IT'S THE SAME AS ANOTHER ONE, THAT
20:56:41 MEANS TO ME THAT THE SAME THREE WAIVERS HAVE TO BE EXACTLY.
20:56:46 YOU SAID EVERYTHING IS THE SAME AS THE OTHER ONE.
20:56:48 THAT MEANS THAT TWO UNITS HAVE TO FACE THE ALLEY.
20:56:52 THAT MEANS THE SAME UNIT THAT YOU ARE COMPARING IT TO HAVE
20:56:55 TO BE FROM 24 FEET TO 15 FEET, AND THEY HAVE TO BE THEN THE
20:57:02 GREEN SPACES FROM 350 OR 311, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S
20:57:07 FACTUAL OR NOT.
20:57:08 IN OTHER WORDS, WHEN YOU ARE COMPARING YOUR PROPERTY ONE
20:57:11 ACROSS FROM YOU, WE DON'T KNOW, OR I DON'T KNOW
20:57:13 SPECIFICALLY, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, IF THAT REDUCTION OF
20:57:15 THE ALLEY IS 24 FEET.
20:57:19 >> SURE.
20:57:20 AND ACTUALLY I HAVE INCLUDED THE APPROVED PD SITE PLANS FOR
20:57:24 305 ACROSS THE STREET IN THE MATERIALS THAT YOU HAVE.
20:57:26 NOW, THEY ACTUALLY GOT A REDUCTION IN GREEN SPACE.
20:57:29 AND YOU ARE RIGHT.
20:57:30 IT'S NOT EXACTLY THE SAME.
20:57:35 MATERIALLY.
20:57:36 SO THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET ACTUALLY IS A LARGER REDUCTION
20:57:42 IN GREEN SPACE THAN WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING.
20:57:47 AND I DON'T RECALL, I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT WHAT THE ALLEY
20:57:53 WIDTH IS ON THAT.
20:57:54 BUT AGAIN, THEY WERE APPROVED FOR A REDUCTION FROM 24 FEET
20:58:00 TO SOMETHING LESS THAN 24 FEET.
20:58:04 I KNOW THERE ARE OTHER -- THERE ARE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF
20:58:17 THIS NATURE THAT HAVE ACCESS ON A 15-FOOT ALLEY.
20:58:25 I HAVE LOOKED AT THAT.
20:58:26 I CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHICH ONES THEY WERE BUT SOME OF
20:58:30 THESE OTHER ONES HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR ACCESS -- EXCUSE ME.
20:58:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO.
20:58:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
20:58:51 AGAIN I AM LOOKING AT FRONT DOOR FACING.
20:58:54 IT WOULD BE GREAT IF ALL THE FRONT DOORS COULD FACE THE
20:58:57 STREET.
20:58:57 I UNDERSTAND THE DESIGNS.
20:58:59 PART OF THE DESIGN IS PARKING.
20:59:02 IF WE ALL DROVE VERY SMALL CARS, SUB COMPACT, MINI COOPERS
20:59:08 THAT ARE ONLY 10-FOOT, RUN ON ELECTRIC, WE WOULD HAVE A MUCH
20:59:11 BETTER PLACE TO LIVE IN.
20:59:13 HOWEVER, WE CAN'T CIRCUMVENT THE LAWS, YET.
20:59:20 BUT I HAVE THE ISSUE WITH THE FOUR PLACES PARKING SPACES IN
20:59:25 BACK.
20:59:25 AND AGAIN I WILL REVERT BACK THE AVERAGE SIZE OF A MID SIZE
20:59:29 CAR IS 14-FOOT.
20:59:32 MINI COOPERS ARE 10.
20:59:34 SOME PEOPLE STILL DRIVE SUVs.
20:59:37 SOME PEOPLE STILL DRIVE PICKUP TRUCKS.
20:59:41 YOU HAVE GOT FOUR SPACES, AND TWO OF THOSE SPACES ARE
20:59:45 18-FOOT WIDE, AND YOU HAVE AN ALLEY THAT'S 10-FOOT WIDE.
20:59:52 SO IF YOU ARE GOING TO TAKE A 14-FOOT CAR, BACK IT OUT, INTO
21:00:00 A -- INTO A 15-FOOT ALLEYWAY, THAT IS FINE.
21:00:06 HOWEVER, MY POINT IS YOU ARE SHOWING IN YOUR OWN PAPER HERE,
21:00:12 COMING OFF THE ALLEY INTO A PARKING SPACE, JUST THAT CURB
21:00:16 ALONE IS TAKING UP MORE THAN HALF OF THAT 18-FOOT PARKING
21:00:21 SPACE.
21:00:22 SO MY CONCERN IS THE PARKING IN THE REAR.
21:00:25 AGAIN, IF -- THANK YOU.
21:00:35 LET ME FINISH AND THEN YOU CAN GO.
21:00:38 IF WE WERE TO SAY AVERAGE PARKING SPACES THAT WOULD BE FINE.
21:00:45 MY CONCERN IS SIZE OF THE VEHICLES, TURNING RADIUS, THE
21:00:49 PARKING SPACE AVAILABLE, IN THE REAR, AND NOT TO MENTION THE
21:00:55 DOORS AREN'T FACING THE STREET.
21:00:57 SO I AM LETTING YOU KNOW MY CONCERNS.
21:01:00 >> UNDERSTOOD.
21:01:01 THANK YOU.
21:01:01 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:01:09 MR. CITRO, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
21:01:13 I WILL DEFINITELY LOOK TO GET OUR TRANSPORTATION STAFF
21:01:16 JONATHAN SCOTT TO GIVE HIS INPUT ON THE DIMENSIONS, AS YOU
21:01:20 SAID, A MINI COOP COMPARED TO A MINI-VAN.
21:01:25 SO JONATHAN SCOTT, ARE YOU ON THE LINE, SIR?
21:01:29 >>JONATHAN SCOTT: YES, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
21:01:31 MR. CITRO, YOU MADE SOME GOOD POINTS.
21:01:33 I MEAN, THE THING I WOULD POINT OUT, THOUGH, I KNOW ASKING
21:01:41 FOR THE WAIVERS TO BACK UP, AND IF YOU HAD A BIGGER VEHICLE
21:01:45 IT WOULD BE TOUGH TO MAKE THAT TURN.
21:01:47 BUT AT LEAST GETTING ENOUGH ROOM, WE WORK WITH THE APPLICANT
21:01:53 TO GET ENOUGH ROOM, AND HE'S GOT LIKE 18 FEET, OVER 18 FEET,
21:01:58 WHICH YOU CAN FIT AN OVERSIZE CAR, SUV, IN THAT SPOT WHICH
21:02:06 IS BETTER THAN DEVELOPMENTS, PARK A CAR THERE.
21:02:16 ASKING FOR A PARKING WAIVER, OR A BACKOUT WAIVER IN THIS
21:02:19 CASE.
21:02:23 SO I THINK THEY PROVIDED SMALLER TURN THAN THE VEHICLES
21:02:29 COMING IN AND OUT OF THERE.
21:02:31 I WILL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT A LITTLE MORE.
21:02:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: JONATHAN, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT, BUT
21:02:37 THOSE ARE -- THAT 18-FOOT IS FOR TWO CARS PARKING.
21:02:41 AND I UNDERSTAND IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER IF JUST ONE CAR WAS
21:02:44 PARKING THERE.
21:02:45 AGAIN I AM JUST VOICING MY OPINION, MR. CHAIR.
21:02:47 THANK YOU.
21:02:47 >> IF I MAY, COUNCILMAN CITRO, THE TURNING MOVEMENT THAT I
21:02:55 SUBMITTED IN ALSO USES A STANDARD PASSENGER VEHICLE WHICH IS
21:03:00 19 FEET LONG.
21:03:03 SO WE USE THE LARGEST NORMAL PASSENGER VEHICLE POSSIBLE,
21:03:09 OKAY.
21:03:11 AND 19 FEET LONG MIGHT SEEM TIGHT, 19 FEET LONG.
21:03:18 I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE ARE VEHICLES THAT ARE -- MOST
21:03:21 VEHICLES ARE NOT THAT SIZE.
21:03:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND I JUST WAS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER
21:03:28 I WANT THAT -- MAYBE I'LL TAKE A LOOK AT IT AGAIN.
21:03:32 I EXPRESSED MY OPINIONS.
21:03:34 >> UNDERSTOOD.
21:03:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
21:03:37 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:03:37 IF YOU ARE HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
21:03:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY MAKE ONE MORE STATEMENT.
21:03:43 IT'S NOT EVEN A QUESTION. IF WE DIDN'T HAVE THOSE PARKING
21:03:46 REQUIREMENTS, ALL DOORS FACING THE STREET, IMAGINE THE
21:03:49 SQUARE FOOTAGE THESE COULD BE.
21:03:51 JUST SAYING.
21:03:52 THANK YOU.
21:03:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR?
21:04:03 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
21:04:04 >> DWIGHT WELLS, 304 SOUTH ALBANY.
21:04:07 IT'S BEEN MY LAW OFFICE AND MY HOME FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS.
21:04:14 FIRST OF ALL, THE CONCERN OF THE PARKING ON THE ALLEY, IT'S
21:04:20 A VERY, VERY REAL CONCERN.
21:04:23 I HAD TO PUT A PARKING LOT BEHIND MY HOUSE WHEN I GOT MY
21:04:29 ZONING CHANGED TO RUN MY LAW OFFICE OUT OF THAT BUNGALOW.
21:04:34 SO I HAVE A PARKING LOT.
21:04:39 BUT TO PROPOSE TWO CARS OF AVERAGE SIZE GOING IN TWO LIVING
21:04:45 UNITS, NOT TWO, FOUR, THAT'S A PROBLEM, I THINK, AND I AM
21:04:52 GLAD THIS GENTLEMAN RAISED, MR. VIERA RAISED, AND I THINK
21:04:56 IT'S A REAL PROBLEM.
21:04:58 NOW, WE ARE NEIGHBORS TO THE PEOPLE THAT ARE PROPOSING TO DO
21:05:08 THIS.
21:05:12 THEY LET THE HOUSE REALLY FALL INTO DISREPAIR.
21:05:17 I MEAN, THESE BUNGALOWS, WHICH LIVE IN, WAS BUILT IN 1937,
21:05:23 IF YOU PAINT IT, YOU TAKE CARE OF IT, IT TAKES CARE OF YOU
21:05:28 FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.
21:05:32 WE TALKED TO THE PEOPLE.
21:05:34 THEY ARE A YOUNG COUPLE.
21:05:35 I GUESS THEY ARE GOING TO GET MARRIED.
21:05:38 AT LEAST I GUESS THEY ARE GOING TO BE ONE OF THE FOUR
21:05:40 COUPLES THAT LIVE IN THERE.
21:05:42 BUT AS YOU PROBABLY KNOW, ALBANY IS BECOMING RATHER VERY
21:05:51 USED THOROUGHFARE BETWEEN GETTING OFF THE TWO MAJOR STREETS
21:05:59 AND GETTING OVER TO HYDE PARK, GETTING OVER TO THE GROCERY
21:06:04 STORE, YOU KNOW, THE WINN-DIXIE, AND TRAFFIC IS A PROBLEM.
21:06:11 IT WAS EXPRESSED SOMEWHAT BY THE FORMER -- BY THE PEOPLE
21:06:15 THAT TALKED JUST A LITTLE WHILE AGO.
21:06:23 WE HAVE TRIED TO GET ANSWERS TO SOME OF OUR ISSUES.
21:06:30 WE REALLY HAVEN'T GOTTEN THEM.
21:06:33 BUT WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER REFUSING THIS
21:06:41 REQUEST BECAUSE I WOULD JUST SAY ON THE RECORD THAT I THINK
21:06:47 IT WAS INTENTIONALLY LET TO FALL INTO DISREPAIR SO THAT THEY
21:06:53 COULD TEAR IT DOWN AND DO WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
21:06:56 AND I THINK THAT'S TOO BAD.
21:07:00 BECAUSE THE SIX HOUSES BETWEEN ALBANY AND THEY ARE ALL
21:07:05 SINGLE-FAMILY, THEY ARE ALL OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE.
21:07:10 FOLKS.
21:07:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
21:07:13 >> OKAY.
21:07:15 THANK YOU.
21:07:15 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:07:16 JOANNE WELLS.
21:07:20 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
21:07:21 >> JOANNE WELLS.
21:07:23 AND GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
21:07:26 AND DWIGHT IS MY HUSBAND AND WE LIVE AT 304 SOUTH ALBANY
21:07:30 NEXT DOOR TO THE PROPOSED REZONING, TO RESIDENTIAL
21:07:35 MULTIFAMILY, AND WE HAVE OWNED THE BUILDING FOR ABOUT 30
21:07:41 YEARS AND WE LOVE OUR BUNGALOW.
21:07:44 WE LOVE LIVING IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT
21:07:48 MAYBE OFFICIAL.
21:07:50 MY HUSBAND AND I WALK IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:07:52 WE LOVE THE FACT THAT WE CAN WALK TO NEARBY STORES AND
21:07:55 RESTAURANTS.
21:07:56 AND THIS IS THE REASON I AM OPPOSING THE REZONING.
21:08:02 THERE'S NOT ANOTHER THREE-STORY BUILDING ANYWHERE ON OUR
21:08:05 BLOCK.
21:08:06 IT'S TOTALLY OUT OF PROPORTION TO THE SURROUNDING BUNGALOWS.
21:08:10 THE TOWNHOUSE ACROSS THE STREET, THE ATTORNEY WAS REFERRING
21:08:14 TO, IS TWO-STORY, NOT THREE.
21:08:20 ONLY TWO UNITS ARE ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING.
21:08:23 FOUR UNITS WOULD BE 200 PERCENT INCREASE IN THE CURRENT
21:08:27 ZONING DENSITY.
21:08:29 THE PROPOSED REDUCING THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 TO 18
21:08:34 FEET WILL RESULT IN TWO PARKING PLACES ON THE STREET, AND
21:08:39 CARS PARKED ACROSS THE SIDEWALK WHICH IS ILLEGAL.
21:08:42 MY HUSBAND AND I BEING SENIORS, WE DO WALK OUT ON THE
21:08:47 SIDEWALK QUITE A BIT, AND WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO WALK OUT IN
21:08:49 THE STREET WITH CARS BLOCKING, AND IT'S ALSO ILLEGAL.
21:08:56 EVEN THOUGH THE FRONT UNITS WOULD HAVE A GARAGE, HARDLY
21:09:00 ANYBODY EVER PARKS IN THAT GARAGE, THIS USAGE FOR STORAGE.
21:09:05 ALSO MOST FAMILIES HAVE TWO CARS, AND THAT WILL MEAN DOUBLE
21:09:08 PARKING AS IT IS VERY LITTLE STREET PARKING AVAILABLE NOW.
21:09:13 THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL CAUSE MORE IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON
21:09:17 THE PROPERTY AND ADD TO THE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS WE ALREADY
21:09:21 HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:09:23 WITH HEAVY RAINS IN THE SUMMER, OUR STREETS ARE FLOODING,
21:09:26 AND THIS WOULD ONLY ADD TO THE PROBLEM.
21:09:32 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM GREEN
21:09:35 SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF 350 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
21:09:39 THE CITY OF TAMPA REZONING STAFF REPORT, THE ALLEY WIDTH
21:09:44 PROVIDES NEIGHBORHOODS CONNECTIVITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE
21:09:48 FUNCTIONS INCLUDING GARBAGE PICKUP AND FIRE RESCUE SERVICES.
21:09:53 THE ALLEYWAYS WERE NEVER INTENDED TO BE A MAIN ENTRANCE FOR
21:09:58 RESIDENTS.
21:10:00 TWO OF THE PROPOSED UNITS WOULD BE OPEN TO THE ALLEYWAY AND
21:10:03 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS GREATLY CONCERNED WITH
21:10:06 PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HINDERING BY ALLOWING
21:10:09 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO FACE THE ALLEY.
21:10:11 THANK YOU.
21:10:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:10:12 ANYBODY ELSE?
21:10:13 >> DON MOORE, SOUTH ALBANY, AND COME IN SOLIDARITY AGAINST
21:10:27 THIS PROPOSED PROJECT, BUT I AM HERE SPECIFICALLY TO SPEAK
21:10:31 ON BEHALF OF PAULA HILL WHO LIVES AT 308 SOUTH ALBANY, ON
21:10:38 THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND SHE'S LIVED
21:10:40 THERE SINCE 1989, WAS UNABLE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING, AND
21:10:45 READING PREPARED TEXT FROM HER.
21:10:47 SHE SUBMITTED A LETTER TO EACH OF YOU STATING HER OBJECTIONS
21:10:50 TO THIS REZONING WHICH WILL INCLUDE ALL THE OBJECTIONS MADE
21:10:53 HERE AND BY OTHERS.
21:10:58 OF PRIMARY CONCERN TO HER IS THE PROTECTED LIVE OAK IN THE
21:11:01 BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY.
21:11:03 ALONG WITH HER LETTER, SHE SUBMITTED A REPORT FROM RETIRED
21:11:07 CITY ARBORIST DAVID RILEY WHO DETERMINED THE AMOUNT CUT BACK
21:11:11 REQUIRED IN THE COVERING OF ITS ROOT STRUCTURE WILL CAUSE
21:11:13 THE TREE TO DIE, WHICH WILL PUT HER OWN HOME AT RISK OF
21:11:17 DAMAGE.
21:11:19 AS SEEN IN THIS PHOTO, WHAT YOU RECEIVED IN REILLY'S REPORT,
21:11:25 THE RED MARKINGS SHOW HOW MUCH WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED,
21:11:28 APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF THE TREE'S CANOPY.
21:11:32 LAST SUMMER, MS. HILL WAS APPROACHED BY THE APPLICANT ABOUT
21:11:35 REMOVING THE TREE AND WAS WILLING TO AGREE TO FINANCIALLY
21:11:39 COMPENSATE FOR THE VALUE OF THE TREE.
21:11:41 THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE WAS IT THREATENING HER.
21:11:46 IT ALSO CAME TO THE LIGHT THAT EXPECTED SCOTT HEAL TO REMOVE
21:11:50 THE TREE AT HER OWN EXPENSE.
21:11:53 PAULA OBJECTS TO THIS REZONING AS THIS DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT
21:11:56 BELONG IN THIS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:11:58 THANK YOU.
21:11:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:12:00 NEXT SPEAKER?
21:12:00 >> NATHAN HAGAN.
21:12:09 INCREDIBLE WALKABILITY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS A RESULT OF
21:12:13 DENSITY LIKE THIS.
21:12:14 IF YOU HAVE BEEN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD YOU KNOW THERE ARE A
21:12:15 LOT OF PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT HAVE GONE UP.
21:12:17 THE WALKABILITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I WOULD SAY, IS A
21:12:20 DIRECT RESULT OF THAT.
21:12:24 I WOULDN'T CALL AT QUADPLEX BUT IT IS, AND QUADPLEXES IN
21:12:30 WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS DON'T APPLY TO PARKING SPOTS.
21:12:33 COUNCILMAN CITRO ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THAT SO I WILL STOP
21:12:36 THERE.
21:12:36 YOU KNOW, ALLEYS SHOULD NOT BE SCARY DANGEROUS PLACES.
21:12:40 IT SEEMS TO ME THAT COUNCIL HAS THE OPPORTUNITIES TO -- IN
21:12:48 VIOLATING THIS PROJECT.
21:12:49 IN FACT I WOULD SAY THE PARKING SITUATION IN THE ALLEY, I
21:12:52 USE THAT STREET TO BIKE TO HOWARD, OR TO WINN-DIXIE, PRETTY
21:12:58 REGULARLY, AND I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THE CARS THAT WOULD BE
21:13:02 PUT IN THAT DEVELOPMENT NOT GOING TO ALBANY AND LEAVE THE
21:13:07 SPACE FOR THE CYCLISTS.
21:13:10 AS SAID TONIGHT, PROJECTS LIKE THIS REDUCE GENTRIFICATION
21:13:13 PRESSURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS, ABSORB DEMAND, FOUR EXTRA
21:13:17 FAMILIES THERE, PRESUMABLY WOULD GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.
21:13:21 SO SOMETHING TO CONSIDER.
21:13:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:13:22 >> MY NAME IS KEN SHEREK AND I AM OPPOSED TO THIS PLAN OF
21:13:36 THE BUILDING ACROSS THE STREET THAT THE GENTLEMAN HAS TOLD
21:13:40 YOU ABOUT.
21:13:45 IT'S A FOUR-PLEX.
21:13:47 HAS A GARAGE IN THE BACK.
21:13:49 AND IT HAS PLACES FOR FOUR CARS -- TWO CARS CAN BE IN THE
21:13:55 GARAGE AND TWO CARS CAN BE OUT.
21:13:58 THIS PLAN HAS NO GARAGES IN THE BACK.
21:14:02 SO ALL THE CARS ARE RIGHT ON THE ALLEY.
21:14:05 THIS SIDE OF THIS STREET IS THE PARKING SIDE OF THE STREET.
21:14:09 THERE'S FOUR MORE BUNGALOWS IN THIS STREET TO BE TAKEN DOWN.
21:14:12 AND THIS IS HOW THIS WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD IS DEVELOPING.
21:14:15 ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU HAVE GOT -- YOU HAVE GOT NO PARKING ON
21:14:20 THAT BLOCK.
21:14:22 AND THEN YOU ARE ALLOWING -- WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS
21:14:27 PUT YOUR THREE-STORY BUILDINGS AT THE END OF THE BLOCKS, NOT
21:14:32 THROUGH THE STREETSCAPE.
21:14:36 YOU ARE TRYING TO REDEVELOP A 100-YEAR-OLD NEIGHBORHOOD, AND
21:14:40 YOU ARE LIKE PUTTING -- YOU ARE JUST PUTTING THINGS UP
21:14:43 BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
21:14:48 IT'S OBVIOUS.
21:14:50 YOU COME AND LOOK AT HOW THIS IS PLAYING OUT, AND IT LOOKS
21:14:53 LIKE -- IT ISN'T A PLANNED COMMUNITY.
21:14:58 AND WE VOTED YOU IN TO TAKE AND DO A NICE JOB.
21:15:06 TAKE A WALK THROUGH THIS AND LOOK AT IT.
21:15:09 YOU ARE CREATING A DISASTER.
21:15:11 WE CAN'T REDO, LIKE YOU REDO KENNEDY BOULEVARD, WE REDO DALE
21:15:19 MABRY, WE REDO -- I MEAN, WE SPENT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON
21:15:24 REDOING DALE MABRY, AND NOW WE REDID IT.
21:15:29 AND NOW WE DID HIMES.
21:15:32 I KNOW WE ARE DOING KENNEDY.
21:15:34 YOU CAN'T DO THIS.
21:15:36 WE CAN'T REDO A NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:15:38 YOU NEED TO TAKE AND HAVE SOME SORT OF IDEA OF WHAT A
21:15:43 DEVELOPMENT IS.
21:15:46 IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A DEVELOPMENT IS, YOU ARE PUTTING TWO
21:15:49 STORY, THREE-STORY, GO AHEAD, PUT THREE STORIES ON AT THE
21:15:53 END OF THE BLOCKS AND YOU NEED TO BE USING ALLEYWAYS FOR
21:16:01 PARKING, NOT STREETS.
21:16:05 THANK YOU.
21:16:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:16:07 YES, SIR?
21:16:11 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:16:15 ARBORIST ERIN FELL SICK SO SHE IS NOT AVAILABLE TONIGHT, BUT
21:16:21 THERE IS A 30-INCH LIVE OAK OFF THE PROPERTY WHICH IF THIS
21:16:28 DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, IT WILL SEVERELY AFFECT THE 30-INCH
21:16:33 LIVE OAK, WHICH STAND SPANS TWO LOTS.
21:16:38 SO SHE DEFINITELY WANTED ME TO SAY THAT FOR THE RECORD, BUT
21:16:41 SHE'S SICK TODAY.
21:16:43 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:16:43 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:16:45 ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
21:16:46 IF NOT WE GO TO REBUTTAL.
21:16:49 SIR?
21:16:50 >> RUSSELL OTTENBERG: IN TERMS OF PARKING ON THE ALLEY, IT
21:17:00 IS A COMMON DESIGN FEATURE THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:17:03 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A SLIGHT CLARIFICATION FOR WHEN MR.
21:17:09 SHEREK -- AND I APOLOGIZE IF I MISPRONOUNCE HIS NAME -- THIS
21:17:15 IS THE ELEVATION FOR THAT.
21:17:17 ONLY TWO, THEY ARE SINGLE-CAR GARAGES ON THE ALLEY, ONE CAR
21:17:23 IS PARKED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE GARAGE AND THE ALLEY.
21:17:28 IT'S TANDEM PARKING.
21:17:31 IT IS NOT TWO-CAR GARAGE.
21:17:35 WITH RESPECT TO THE HEIGHT, THE RM-16 ZONING DISTRICT THAT
21:17:39 THIS IS IN CURRENTLY ALLOWS A HEIGHT UP TO 35 FEET BY RIGHT.
21:17:45 SO IF THE OWNER WANTED TO, THEY COULD DEMOLISH THE HOUSE
21:17:51 TODAY, BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE 30 FEET HIGH WITHOUT ANY
21:17:55 CONSIDERATION FROM ANYONE.
21:17:56 THAT IS A USE BY RIGHT.
21:17:57 WE ARE HOLDING THAT CAP IN OUR PD, AND IT WILL BE UNDER THE
21:18:03 35 FEET.
21:18:05 THERE IS NO PARKING ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
21:18:08 ALL THE PARKING IS ON-SITE.
21:18:10 IT HAS SUFFICIENT DEPTH BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE
21:18:14 FACE OF THE GARAGES OR THE FACE OF THE BUILDING TO
21:18:16 ACCOMMODATE FULL-SIZE VEHICLES.
21:18:19 AS FAR AS GARAGES BEING USED FOR STORAGE, THAT CAN BE FOR
21:18:24 ANY UNIT, THAT DEPENDS ON THE PROPERTY OWNER, IS NOT
21:18:27 SOMETHING THAT IS NECESSARILY PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
21:18:34 THAT WILL BE DEPENDENT ON ANY OWNER, AND THAT COULD HAPPEN
21:18:38 ON ANY PROPERTY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:18:41 WITH RESPECT TO DRAINAGE, WE ARE REQUIRED BY CITY OF TAMPA
21:18:45 TO PROVIDE TREATMENT, VOLUME ON THE SITE, AND WE ARE DOING
21:18:48 THAT.
21:18:53 THERE ARE NUMEROUS UNITS THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT
21:18:55 FACE THE ALLEY.
21:19:00 WITH RESPECT TO THE TREE, THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE EXISTING
21:19:04 PROPERTY.
21:19:06 THIS IS THE TREE IN QUESTION.
21:19:08 THIS IS AN AIR CONDITIONING UNIT.
21:19:10 RIGHT NEXT TO THE TREE THERE'S A FENCE RIGHT BETWEEN HERE.
21:19:14 THIS IS THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE.
21:19:18 THEY HAVE A PIER, RIGHT HERE.
21:19:22 OKAY?
21:19:24 AND THEY PROBABLY HAVE A PIER RIGHT HERE AT THIS OTHER
21:19:28 CORNER.
21:19:34 THESE ARE THE PROPOSED UNITS.
21:19:35 THIS IS THE TREE.
21:19:38 THIS IS THE GROUND FLOOR EXTERIOR WALL.
21:19:43 THIS UNIT, AND BECAUSE WE WANTED SOME CONSISTENCY, THIS
21:19:48 UNIT, THIS UNIT WAS SPECIFICALLY NOTCHED TO PROVIDE GREATER
21:19:54 PROTECTION FOR THE TREE.
21:19:57 OKAY?
21:19:58 SO WE ARE INCREASING THE DISTANCE FROM THE TREE TO THE
21:20:03 BUILDING.
21:20:05 IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE ARE GOING TO USE PIER AND LINTEL,
21:20:12 SUSPENDED FLOORS, ALL OF THE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES THAT
21:20:16 ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY.
21:20:22 SO WE ARE GOING TO BE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO PROTECT THE
21:20:26 ROOT STRUCTURE OF THE TREES STATED, AND ARE COMPLYING WITH
21:20:31 ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE CITY HAS MADE FOR THAT
21:20:33 TREE.
21:20:37 WITH RESPECT TO THE CANOPY, WE ALSO HAD AN ARBORIST LOOK AT
21:20:42 THIS.
21:20:42 THE ARBORIST REPORT IS PART OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE.
21:20:46 THE ARBORIST HAS SAID THAT NO MORE THAN 25% OF THE CANOPY
21:20:52 WOULD BE REMOVED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, AND ANY REMOVAL
21:20:57 WOULD BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS.
21:21:01 SO THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE UNQUALIFIED, IT'S ALL GOING TO BE
21:21:05 DONE UNDER THE ARBORIST'S DIRECTION.
21:21:09 I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SIMON AMESBURY, HE WILL BE THE BUILDER
21:21:16 FOR THIS PROJECT IF IT GETS APPROVED.
21:21:19 I WOULD LIKE HIM TO TALK ABOUT THE CONDITION OF THE EXISTING
21:21:23 RESIDENCE, BECAUSE UNFORTUNATELY IT IS NOT SAVABLE.
21:21:28 HE CAN SPEAK TO THAT BETTER THAN I CAN.
21:21:29 >> MY NAME IS SIMON AMESBURY, 730 SOUTH SPERLING.
21:21:36 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:21:37 YES, JUST TALKING ABOUT EXISTING PROPERTY, THE CURRENTS
21:21:39 OWNER LIVED IN IT SINCE PURCHASE WHICH I BELIEVE WAS 2017, I
21:21:45 BELIEVE, AND UNTIL WITHIN THE LAST YEAR WHEN THEIR PLUMBING
21:21:49 FAILED, SO CANNOT LIVE THERE, A FOUNDATION HAS COLLAPSED,
21:21:54 HAS WOOD ROT, TERMITE DAMAGE, WHICH MOST OF THE PROPERTIES
21:21:57 HAVE BECAUSE OF THE AGE.
21:21:59 [BELL SOUNDS]
21:22:00 BUT SHE CANNOT LIVE IN IT.
21:22:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 30 MORE SECONDS.
21:22:05 >> SHE CANNOT LIVE IN IT SO SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE, AND
21:22:08 THE PROBLEM WITH THE VALUE OF PROPERTY AND SO ON, PUTTING A
21:22:13 SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON THERE DOES NOT BRING THE PROPERTY BACK
21:22:18 TO SELL.
21:22:19 SHE CAN'T AFFORD TO DO THAT, AND LOOKING TO DO SOMETHING
21:22:23 THAT BENEFITS THE AREA AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA.
21:22:28 ANY QUESTIONS?
21:22:28 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:22:30 ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE?
21:22:34 ANYTHING?
21:22:35 DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE?
21:22:37 MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:22:38 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
21:22:41 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:22:42 ANY OPPOSED?
21:22:46 COUNCILMAN HURTAK?
21:22:50 >>LYNN HURTAK: WELL, DO YOU WANT TO DO A MOTION FIRST AND
21:22:55 THEN HAVE CONVERSATION?
21:22:57 HOW DOES THIS WORK?
21:22:59 HOW WOULD YOU ALL LIKE TO DO IT?
21:23:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN, THE MAKER OF THE MOTION IS
21:23:02 REQUIRED TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.
21:23:06 THE SECONDER DOES NOT.
21:23:08 I WOULD LET COUNCIL KNOW THAT.
21:23:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HE'S RIGHT.
21:23:17 IF YOU MAKE A MOTION THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO --
21:23:19 >>LYNN HURTAK: RIGHT.
21:23:20 I DIDN'T KNOW IF ANYBODY WANTED ANY CONVERSATION BEFORE.
21:23:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN HAVE CONVERSATION.
21:23:26 WE CAN HAVE QUESTIONS.
21:23:27 THE HEARING IS CLOSED.
21:23:28 >>LYNN HURTAK: THEN I WILL JUST DO A MOTION AND SEE HOW IT
21:23:33 GOES.
21:23:35 I MOVE TO DENY REZ 22-20 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 306
21:23:42 SOUTH ALBANY AVENUE DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE APPLICANT TO
21:23:45 MEET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL
21:23:51 EVIDENCE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED IN THE SITE
21:23:53 PLAN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE
21:23:56 AND APPLICANT'S FAILURE TO MEET ITS BURDEN OF PROVE WITH
21:24:00 RESPECT TO THE REQUESTED WAIVERS.
21:24:06 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE -- IN TERMS OF THE
21:24:10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ENCOURAGING THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
21:24:18 OF SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROJECTS TO INCLUDE THE
21:24:19 ORIENTATION OF FRONT DOORS TO SIDEWALKS AND STREETS, THE
21:24:23 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DOES NOT PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT
21:24:29 SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE, AND REALLY THE
21:24:34 WAIVERS, THE ISLE WIDTH WAIVER TRANSPORTATION IS A CONCERN.
21:24:41 AND --
21:24:43 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WOULD ASK THAT YOU CITE TO SECTIONS OF
21:24:46 THE CODE.
21:24:47 >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M SORRY, WAIVERS, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
21:24:50 SECTION 27-139.4.
21:24:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY.
21:24:55 AND WITH REGARD TO ANYTHING ELSE?
21:24:58 >>LYNN HURTAK: OH, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
21:25:00 27-136.
21:25:04 >> SECOND.
21:25:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN
21:25:09 HURTAK WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:25:11 ROLL CALL.
21:25:12 >>LYNN HURTAK: --
21:25:18 >>> ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION?
21:25:20 >>LYNN HURTAK: IT'S MY MOTION, BUT I THINK THE DENSITY IS
21:25:25 JUST A LITTLE TOO MUCH FOR THIS LOT, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE OF
21:25:29 THE PARKING.
21:25:30 I THINK IF WE DIDN'T HAVE TO HAVE THE PARKING, THE WIDTH OF
21:25:34 THE ALLEY IS VERY CONCERNING TO ME, AS IS THE FRONTAGE BEING
21:25:39 SO FAR FORWARD.
21:25:44 YEAH, THE TREE IS ALSO A CONCERN.
21:25:50 EVEN THOUGH THEY SAY THEY CAN WORK ON IT.
21:25:52 SO ALL OF THIS, IT'S JUST TOO MUCH.
21:25:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:25:56 WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, SECOND BY
21:26:01 COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:26:02 ROLL CALL.
21:26:02 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
21:26:04 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:26:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:26:08 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:26:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:26:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:26:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:26:14 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:26:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:26:18 LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT.
21:26:21 MR. HUSAIN.
21:26:43 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: THANKS SO MUCH.
21:26:44 [SOUNDING GAVEL]
21:26:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:26:48 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: I'LL WAIT A COUPLE SECONDS.
21:27:05 ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:27:07 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 13, CASE REZ 22-21 IS BEING PRESENTED FOR
21:27:14 FIRST READING FOR THE LOCATION AT 4801 COMMERCE STREET.
21:27:19 PROPOSED REZONING FROM IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL AND RM-24
21:27:22 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE
21:27:29 GOODS, AND GASOLINE.
21:27:32 WE HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE LINE.
21:27:34 DANNY.
21:27:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. COLLINS, GO AHEAD.
21:27:37 >>DANNY COLLINS: MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
21:27:59 MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN?
21:28:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN WE GET HIS SCREEN UP?
21:28:16 ALL RIGHT.
21:28:17 THERE WE GO.
21:28:18 GO AHEAD GO AHEAD, SIR.
21:28:19 >>DANNY COLLINS: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
21:28:23 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
21:28:25 OUR LAST CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE
21:28:28 SPECIFICALLY THE PORT TAMPA NEIGHBORHOOD, SPANISH AMERICAN
21:28:34 MEMORIAL PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC PARK LOCATED
21:28:38 APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE,
21:28:41 CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET
21:28:44 SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE KISSIMMEE STREET,
21:28:48 COMMERCE STREET, SITE WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE A, ALSO WITHIN
21:28:51 THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
21:28:53 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE AREA, SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
21:28:58 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCE STREET,
21:29:01 JUST WEST OF SOUTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF WEST
21:29:06 PRESCOTT STREET.
21:29:08 GENERALLY,
21:29:10 TO THE EAST OF COMMERCE STREET, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL USES.
21:29:15 THERE ARE NONRESIDENTIAL USES ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT SITE
21:29:18 ALONG COMMERCE STREET.
21:29:23 TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS PRESENTLY VACANT.
21:29:28 HERE IS THE ADOPTIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
21:29:31 CURRENTLY JOINING THE SUBJECT SITE RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
21:29:34 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION AND THE NORTHERN PART
21:29:40 OF THE SITE RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION.
21:29:44 DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RESIDENTIAL 35
21:29:47 AND THAT'S THE EAST, CMU-35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
21:29:54 THERE IS A CSX RAILROAD THAT RUNS WITHIN THE WESTERN
21:29:58 BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
21:30:02 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE SURROUNDING AREA AND
21:30:06 FINDS IT COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE.
21:30:10 THE SUBJECT SITE IS EAST OF AN EXISTING CSX RAIL, AND NORTH
21:30:18 PLANNED FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES.
21:30:20 TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE PARCELS DESIGNATED
21:30:22 CMU-35 AS WELL AS PRESENTLY BEING UTILIZED FOR -- USES.
21:30:27 PROPOSING A COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE AND CANOPY ON PORTIONERS
21:30:31 SITE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
21:30:33 PARKING, THE STRUCTURE PROVIDED ON THE SITE DESIGNATED R-35.
21:30:38 THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH BOTH FUTURE LAND USES ON THE
21:30:41 SITE.
21:30:43 IT IS DESIGNED FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY AND WALKABILITY.
21:30:48 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE SITE
21:30:51 ALONG COMMERCE STREET, FROM THE ENTRANCE TO THE SIDEWALK.
21:30:58 THESE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WILL HAVE SAFETY ACCESS, FOR
21:31:02 STORAGE AS WELL AS THE TRANSIT STOP LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
21:31:04 500 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF -- AND
21:31:09 COMMERCE STREET.
21:31:09 PLANNING POLICY 15.2.4 REQUIRES COMMERCIAL USES BUFFERED
21:31:15 FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
21:31:17 THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY [DISTORTION] -- TO THE
21:31:21 LANDSCAPE BUFFERING SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. LANDS TO THE
21:31:25 WEST OF THE SITE ARE RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-35 DESIGNATION.
21:31:29 THE CSX RAIL RUNS ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT
21:31:34 SITE, SEPARATING THE PROPOSED USES FROM FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
21:31:40 ON THE SITE, ABUTTING PARCELS.
21:31:42 THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE
21:31:44 REQUEST TO -- TO FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO THE WEST
21:31:50 OF THE SITE.
21:31:50 ALL DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR RENOVATIONS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
21:31:52 PROVIDE EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING AND SHADE TREES ALONG
21:31:55 SIDEWALKS, TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY, REDUCE OVERALL
21:31:59 DEPENDENCE ON AUTOMOBILES, LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO THE
21:32:01 PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON COMMERCE STREET SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN,
21:32:05 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THAT THE APPLICANT ADJUST
21:32:07 HIS POLICY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THAT'S LAND USE
21:32:11 POLICY [DISTORTION] 15-POINT -- 2.7.
21:32:15 IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH
21:32:19 THE SURROUNDING AREA CONSISTENT WITH UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND
21:32:21 USE DESIGNATION.
21:32:26 CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
21:32:28 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
21:32:29 I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
21:32:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. COLLINS?
21:32:35 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:32:38 CASE REZ 22-21, THE APPLICANT IS RAECHEL PAPUGA.
21:32:45 THE PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-24 AND IG TO PD RETAIL SALES,
21:32:51 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE.
21:32:53 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS, BOTH TO DO WITH
21:32:56 NATURAL RESOURCES.
21:33:03 AS I SHOW AN AERIAL OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THE SITE HERE
21:33:06 OUTLINED IN RED.
21:33:07 TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND ALSO
21:33:11 VACANT LAND.
21:33:13 THIS IS ZONED RM-24.
21:33:15 TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY BACK
21:33:19 HERE, AND ALSO VACANT COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS.
21:33:24 THIS IS ZONED, YOU HAVE CG AND RS-50.
21:33:30 TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE VACANT LAND AS WELL AS RESIDENTIAL
21:33:35 SINGLE-FAMILY FARTHER TO THE SOUTH.
21:33:38 TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
21:33:43 THE SITE RUNS ALONG CSX RAILROAD TO THE WEST, AND ALSO
21:33:50 COMMERCE STREET TO THE SOUTH AND EAST.
21:33:59 AS I SHOW THE SITE PLAN, BLOW IT UP A LITTLE BIT,
21:34:11 YOU WILL SEE THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT HERE.
21:34:13 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS AN AREA OF 113,669 SQUARE FEET OR
21:34:22 2.61 ACRES.
21:34:26 THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT WILL BE 23 FEET, A TOTAL OF 28
21:34:31 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, AND 36 ARE BEING PROVIDED BY
21:34:34 THE APPLICANT.
21:34:36 THERE'S TWO WAYS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE ON COMMERCE
21:34:41 STREET AND ALSO SOUTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
21:34:48 AS YOU SEE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITE, YOU WILL SEE
21:34:53 A CONVENIENCE STORE AND RETAIL SALES.
21:35:04 AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE YOU WILL SEE THE CURRENT SITE
21:35:06 VACANT.
21:35:09 THE VACANT COMMERCIAL BACK THERE.
21:35:11 ALSO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY BEHIND IT.
21:35:13 ON THE SITE.
21:35:15 TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE ON THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
21:35:21 AND TO THE SOUTH AROUND VACANT LAND.
21:35:29 AND TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE VACANT
21:35:33 LAND AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
21:35:37 TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE VACANT LAND AS WELL
21:35:39 AS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY COMPLEX.
21:35:47 AFTER REVIEWING ANALYZING THE SITE, AND THE CASE,
21:35:51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THIS
21:35:53 APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
21:35:55 THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
21:35:57 IF APPROVED, MODIFICATIONS MUST BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN
21:36:00 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND AS ALREADY STATED IN
21:36:05 THE STAFF REPORT.
21:36:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HAD YOU ZAIN?
21:36:10 NO.
21:36:11 WE HAVE APPLICANTS WHO ARE VIRTUAL, REY RAECHEL AND NICOLE.
21:36:16 IF YOU COULD TURN YOUR CAMERAS OWN AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND
21:36:19 SO WE COULD SWEAR YOU IN.
21:36:25 ALL RIGHT.
21:36:29 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE ARE GOING TO SWEAR BOTH
21:36:32 OF YOU IN.
21:36:33 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
21:36:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF.
21:36:39 WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.
21:36:45 >> SORRY ABOUT THAT.
21:36:47 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
21:36:47 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOU MAY SPEAK.
21:36:51 >> OKAY.
21:36:52 I'M NICOLE WEIR, ONE OF THE APPLICANTS.
21:36:55 WE ARE HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF INTERBAY LLC, LOOKING TO
21:37:01 RECEIVE POSITIVE FEEDBACK FOR OUR REQUEST FOR THE REZONING
21:37:04 TO DEVELOP A CONVENIENCE STORE AND HOPES TO SELL RETAIL
21:37:09 GOODS AND CONVENIENCE GOODS.
21:37:17 AS WELL AS FUEL.
21:37:18 THAT'S WHAT WE ARE HERE FOR.
21:37:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:37:21 ARE YOU RAECHEL?
21:37:23 >> I'M RAECHEL.
21:37:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY OR ADD?
21:37:31 >> SEEKING POSITIVE FEEDBACK.
21:37:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS?
21:37:39 NO?
21:37:39 IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK?
21:37:42 NO?
21:37:42 I SEE WE HAVE STEPHANIE POYNOR REGISTERED.
21:37:45 IS SHE ON?
21:37:47 MS. POYNOR, IF YOU ARE ON, TURN ON YOUR CAMERA, RAISE YOUR
21:37:51 RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.
21:37:53 >> HELLO.
21:38:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:38:04 TURN YOUR CAMERA ON.
21:38:05 WE CAN'T SEE YOU.
21:38:23 THERE YOU ARE.
21:38:25 PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
21:38:26 RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:38:26 >> OH, CARROLL ANN IS NOT HERE?
21:38:29 SHE'S IN TROUBLE.
21:38:30 DARN IT.
21:38:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND YOUR CAMERA IS OFF AGAIN.
21:38:37 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
21:38:51 >> I SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING
21:38:54 BUT THE TRUTH.
21:38:55 (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
21:38:56 >> YES, MA'AM.
21:38:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD.
21:38:59 >> QUICK AND DIRTY.
21:39:01 I'M EXCITED TO SUPPORT THIS.
21:39:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOT TO KEEP THE CAMERA ON.
21:39:06 >> YOU KNOW I'M HERE.
21:39:09 I'M VERY EXCITED --
21:39:11 >> NO.
21:39:13 NO.
21:39:13 >> OH, MY GOD, YOU ARE KILLING ME.
21:39:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE TEN MORE CASES AFTER THIS.
21:39:30 >> THIS IS THE LAST ONE BECAUSE WE ARE ALWAYS LAST.
21:39:36 SAVE THE BEST FOR LAST.
21:39:38 I TURNED IT ON AND IT KEEPS TURNING ITSELF OFF.
21:39:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THERE YOU GO.
21:39:45 GO AHEAD.
21:39:45 I'M GOING TO LEAVE IT LIKE THAT.
21:39:47 THERE WE GO.
21:39:48 OKAY.
21:39:48 SO I AM EXCITED TO TALK ABOUT THIS, BECAUSE SOUTH OF GANDY
21:39:53 AND WEST OF DALE MABRY, WE DO NOT HAVE A GAS STATION.
21:39:57 PLEASE, THIS IS IMPORTANT.
21:40:00 I'M EXCITED TO HEAR THIS APPLICANT HAS SAID THAT THEY WERE
21:40:04 GOING TO PUT SIDEWALKS IN, EVEN THOUGH THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS
21:40:06 ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD, IT'S NICE TO HEAR THEM COMMIT TO
21:40:11 THAT.
21:40:13 I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME SMALL CHANGES IN THE EXTERIOR OF
21:40:15 THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE PORT TAMPA LIBRARY IS JUST ACROSS
21:40:18 THE STREET AND SO IS THE PARKS BUILDING WHICH IS -- THEY ARE
21:40:23 BOTH HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.
21:40:29 THANK YOU.
21:40:30 IF WE CAN DEAL WITH THAT I WOULD BE TICKLED PINK.
21:40:34 ALSO, I KNOW THAT THEY ASKED FOR A WAIVER FOR THE BRICK
21:40:37 WALL -- OR THE CINDERBLOCK WALL TO THE WEST SIDE THAT GOES
21:40:41 ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
21:40:43 I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THEM HAVING A WALL THERE, BECAUSE WHAT
21:40:47 WILL HAPPEN IS IT WILL END UP BEING A HIDING SPOT FOR FOLKS
21:40:52 WHO HAVE NO PLACE TO LIVE.
21:40:54 AND I AM NOT AGAINST FOLKS WHO HAVE NO PLACE TO LIVE, BUT IT
21:40:58 WILL END UP BEING A JUNK PILE BACK THERE.
21:41:01 AND SO THE PEOPLE WHO THEY WILL BE SHIELDING FROM, WITH THAT
21:41:06 BEING A CINDERBLOCK WALL, THE APARTMENTS BEHIND, TO THE WEST
21:41:09 OF THEM, THEY ARE GOING TO END UP WITH A BUNCH OF GARBAGE
21:41:13 BACK THERE.
21:41:14 BUSHES ARE GREAT, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT COMPLETELY, YOU KNOW,
21:41:18 HIDING FROM IT.
21:41:20 THOSE ARE MY BIG ISSUES.
21:41:22 AND I THINK EVERYBODY ELSE DOWN HERE IS HAPPY TO HEAR ABOUT
21:41:25 IT, AND WE ARE EXCITED, AND I HOPE THEY FIND SOMEBODY PUT A
21:41:31 NEW GAS STATION IN THERE.
21:41:34 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:41:34 >> NOW I CAN GO TO BED.
21:41:37 YOU ALL HAVE A GOOD EVENING.
21:41:39 THANK YOU.
21:41:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD NIGHT.
21:41:43 IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE?
21:41:45 >>THE CLERK: NO.
21:41:46 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: APPLICANTS, NICOLE, DO YOU HAVE
21:41:48 ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD OR ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
21:41:50 MEMBERS?
21:41:52 COUNCILMAN CITRO?
21:41:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY, TO THE PETITIONERS.
21:41:55 I SAY THIS, YOU REALIZE THAT A LOT MORE GAS STATIONS ARE
21:41:59 PUTTING IN CHARGING STATIONS FOR EVs.
21:42:05 THAT'S A STATEMENT.
21:42:06 NUMBER TWO, WITH BEING SO CLOSE TO THE PETROLEUM SOURCE IN
21:42:11 PORT TAMPA, IS THE GAS GOING TO BE CHEAPER?
21:42:16 I'M JUST --
21:42:20 [ LAUGHTER ]
21:42:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, ANYTHING ELSE?
21:42:22 COUNCILMAN GUDES?
21:42:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE.
21:42:27 >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
21:42:29 LAST TIME I WILL TALK TODAY.
21:42:35 THE SITE PLAN HERE, AS MS. POYNOR TALKED ABOUT THE SIDEWALKS
21:42:38 HERE, TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, AND ALSO THIS WILL BE
21:42:44 ADDRESSED DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS, THE SIDEWALKS.
21:42:48 SO AT THIS POINT, IT WILL BE ADDRESSED DURING THE PERMITTING
21:42:55 PROCESS IF APPROVED.
21:42:56 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:42:57 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
21:42:57 ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
21:43:00 MOTION TO CLOSE?
21:43:01 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
21:43:02 >>MARTIN SHELBY: FROM THE APPLICANT.
21:43:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING BEFORE
21:43:06 WE CLOSE, NICOLE?
21:43:07 >> NO, I THINK WE ARE GOOD.
21:43:10 THANK YOU.
21:43:10 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:43:13 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
21:43:14 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:43:15 ALL RIGHT.
21:43:15 ANY OPPOSED?
21:43:17 COUNCILMAN GUDES, WOULD YOU MIND READING THIS?
21:43:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: REVISIONS.
21:43:24 >>ORLANDO GUDES: FILE REZ 22-21, FOR FIRST READING
21:43:28 CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
21:43:30 VICINITY OF 4801 COMMERCE STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
21:43:33 FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
21:43:35 ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL AND
21:43:38 RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
21:43:41 RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE, PROVIDING AN
21:43:44 EFFECTIVE DATE.
21:43:46 ALSO FINDINGS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF
21:43:51 REPORTS, THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER OF
21:43:56 THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IN FURTHERANCE OF LAND USE POLICY
21:43:59 1.2.3, 1.2.8, 9.3.9, 9.3.4, 15.2.1, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS
21:44:09 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT AT APPROPRIATE
21:44:13 LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUND
21:44:16 BEING NEIGHBORHOOD.
21:44:18 >> SECOND.
21:44:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE SUBSTITUTE.
21:44:25 MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MEMBER GUDES.
21:44:27 SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CITRO.
21:44:30 ROLL CALL.
21:44:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
21:44:31 >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
21:44:32 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
21:44:32 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
21:44:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:44:35 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:44:37 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
21:44:38 >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
21:44:39 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2022 AT
21:44:44 9:30 A.M.
21:44:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
21:44:45 WE ARE GOING TO GO TO NEW BUSINESS.
21:44:48 COUNCILMEMBER VIERA, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, SIR?
21:44:50 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
21:44:51 I HAVE SOME STAFF PLANNING COMMISSION ONES SO BEAR WITH ME.
21:44:55 THESE ARE NEVER FUN.
21:44:57 I REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SETTING AN ADOPTION
21:45:00 HEARING FOR TA/CPA 22-04 FOR MAY 26, 2022 AT 5:01 P.M. AND
21:45:10 TO DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK
21:45:13 WITH FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
21:45:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND.
21:45:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA,
21:45:20 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:45:22 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:45:23 ANY OPPOSED?
21:45:23 YES, SIR, GO AHEAD.
21:45:24 >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION NUMBER TWO, A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING
21:45:26 COMMISSION SETTING A TRANSMITTAL HEARING FOR TA/CPA-22-04
21:45:33 AND TA/CPA 22-07 FOR MAY 26, 2022 AT 5:01 P.M. TO DIRECT
21:45:42 LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK WITH A FORM OF
21:45:45 NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
21:45:47 >> SECOND.
21:45:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:45:51 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:45:52 ALL RIGHT.
21:45:52 ANY OPPOSED?
21:45:53 YES, SIR.
21:45:53 >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
21:45:55 THE THIRD REQUEST BY PLANNING COMMISSION SETTING AN ADOPTION
21:45:58 HEARING FOR TA/CPA 21-26, TA/CPA 21-29, TA/CPA 22-01, TA/CPA
21:46:10 22-02, AND TA/CPA 22-03 FOR JUNE 23rd, 2022, AT
21:46:20 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE
21:46:22 CITY CLERK WITH A FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC
21:46:25 HEARINGS.
21:46:25 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
21:46:27 SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:46:29 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:46:30 ANY OPPOSED?
21:46:31 YES, SIR?
21:46:31 >> AND THEN I NEED TO RATIFY TWO COMMENDATIONS, IF I MAY, I
21:46:37 PRESENTED ON APRIL 13, 2022 IN HONOR OF
21:46:41 NATIONAL BORINQUENEER DAY, 65th REGIMENT, A
21:46:47 COMMENDATION.
21:46:49 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
21:46:53 COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:46:53 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:46:54 ANY OPPOSED?
21:46:55 YES, SIR?
21:46:55 >>LUIS VIERA: AND THEN I MOTION TO RATIFY AND CONFIRM
21:47:00 COMMENDATION PRESENTED TO THE MCDONALD TRAINING CENTER FOR
21:47:02 THEIR 17TH MILLION SUN PASS TRANSPONDER PACKAGE BEING
21:47:06 SHIPPED.
21:47:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:47:11 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:47:12 ANY OPPOSED?
21:47:13 ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
21:47:14 >>LUIS VIERA: THAT'S IT.
21:47:15 THANK YOU, SIR.
21:47:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON?
21:47:18 >>BILL CARLSON: YES, SIR.
21:47:21 I JUST NEED TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MY FORM
21:47:24 ABs FOR LAST WEEK FOR ITEM NUMBER 43 AND 44 AND IT WAS
21:47:30 THAT COMPANY WITH WHOM I AM RETAINED AS A BUSINESS THAT HAS
21:47:34 BUSINESS IN THESE MATTERS.
21:47:35 WE DON'T WORK ON THESE MATTERS DIRECTLY BUT OUR CLIENTS
21:47:39 COULD BENEFIT FROM IT.
21:47:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:47:42 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:47:42 ANY OPPOSED?
21:47:43 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOTHING.
21:47:46 >>LYNN HURTAK: NOTHING.
21:47:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
21:47:50 I WILL RATTLE THESE OFF RATHER QUICKLY.
21:47:53 MOTION TO RESCHEDULE THE JUNE 7th OFFICER OF THE MONTH
21:47:57 COMMENDATION TO JUNE 16th, REGULAR SESSION, 9:00 A.M.
21:48:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:48:04 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:48:05 ANY OPPOSED?
21:48:05 YES, SIR.
21:48:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO RESCHEDULE THE AUGUST 16th
21:48:09 OFFICER OF THE MONTH COMMENDATION TO AUGUST 25th REGULAR
21:48:12 SESSION 9 A.M.
21:48:13 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CITRO, SECOND BY
21:48:15 COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:48:16 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:48:17 ANY OPPOSED?
21:48:18 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE.
21:48:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO RESCHEDULE THE OCTOBER 11th
21:48:24 OFFICER OF THE MONTH, OCTOBER 20TH REGULAR SESSION 9 A.M.
21:48:26 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:48:27 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:48:28 ALL RIGHT.
21:48:29 ANY OPPOSED?
21:48:30 ALL RIGHT.
21:48:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION TO RESCHEDULE -- WHAT WAS THAT,
21:48:34 OCTOBER?
21:48:34 THE DECEMBER 6th OFFICER OF THE MONTH COMMENDATION TO
21:48:37 DECEMBER 15th REGULAR SESSION 9 A.M.
21:48:40 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:48:43 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:48:44 ANY OPPOSED?
21:48:44 GO AHEAD.
21:48:44 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND I WOULD LIKE TO WISH ONE OF OUR TAMPA
21:48:49 FAMILY MEMBERS MS. ABBYE FEELEY A HAPPY, HAPPY BIRTHDAY.
21:48:54 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MEMBER CITRO TO
21:48:58 WISH HER A HAPPY BIRTHDAY, SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
21:49:01 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:49:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MISS LISA, I'M SORRY, AM I ALSO TO DO THE
21:49:06 ATU?
21:49:07 BECAUSE THOSE WEREN'T HIGHLIGHTED.
21:49:09 FORGIVE ME.
21:49:10 RESCHEDULING THE JUNE 7th ATU LOCAL 1464 EMPLOYEE OF THE
21:49:16 MONTH COMMENDATION TO JUNE 16th AT 9 A.M.
21:49:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MEMBER GUDES.
21:49:21 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:49:22 OPPOSED?
21:49:23 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO RESCHEDULE THE AUGUST 16TH ATU
21:49:24 1464 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH COMMENDATION TO AUGUST 25TH
21:49:31 REGULAR SESSION 9 A.M.
21:49:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:49:35 ALL RIGHT.
21:49:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO RESCHEDULE THE OCTOBER 11th ATU
21:49:40 LOCAL 1464 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH COMMENDATION TO OCTOBER
21:49:43 20th REGULAR SESSION 9 A.M.
21:49:45 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:49:47 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:49:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO RESCHEDULE THE DECEMBER 6th ATU
21:49:51 LOCAL 1464 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH COMMENDATION TO DECEMBER
21:49:55 15th REGULAR SESSION 9 A.M.
21:49:59 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
21:50:00 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:50:01 ANY OPPOSED?
21:50:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THAT'S IT, MR. CHAIR.
21:50:04 THANK YOU.
21:50:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
21:50:08 >> I HAVE TWO OF THEM.
21:50:11 CHUCK CARDEN OF TAMPA BAY WATER HAS REQUESTED TO SPEAK BEFORE TAMPA CITY
21:50:12 COUNCIL ON THURSDAY, JUNE 2nd, 2022 AT 9 A.M. TO GIVE
21:50:17 THE STATE OF THE TAMPA BAY WATER LONG-TERM MASTER WATER PLAN
21:50:22 UPDATE PRESENTATION TO TAKE FIVE TO SEVEN MINUTES, HAVE A
21:50:26 PowerPoint PRESENTATION.
21:50:27 HE WOULD LIKE TO BE FIRST OR CLOSE TO THE TOP AS POSSIBLE.
21:50:30 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
21:50:32 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:50:33 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:50:34 ANY OPPOSED?
21:50:36 GO AHEAD.
21:50:37 >> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.
21:50:41 FOR RECEIVING THE DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD
21:50:43 FOR THE 2022 BUDGET FROM GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS
21:50:47 ASSOCIATION.
21:50:48 THIS IS THE AWARD IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF RECOGNITION IN
21:50:51 GOVERNMENT BUDGETING AND REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT
21:50:57 ACHIEVEMENT BY A BUDGET OFFICE.
21:50:59 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THIS PRESENTATION COMMENDATION ON
21:51:01 TUESDAY, MAY 10th, 2022.
21:51:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO.
21:51:06 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:51:07 THAT'S IT?
21:51:09 COUNCILMAN MEMBER MIRANDA, I WILL GIVE YOU THE GAVEL.
21:51:15 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO
21:51:19 MAY 10th TO EILEEN ROSARIO FOR ASSISTING CITY COUNCIL
21:51:26 TAMPA CONVENTION CENTER AND SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL WITH
21:51:30 OUR EVENING MEETINGS.
21:51:33 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND BY MR. CITRO.
21:51:35 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:51:36 OPPOSED?
21:51:37 THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
21:51:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO
21:51:41 PRESENT A COMMENDATION ON MAY 10TH TO JIM AND RAY FROM THE
21:51:44 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT RECOGNIZING THE OUTSTANDING WORK THE
21:51:47 PAST YEAR OF ASSISTING CITY COUNCIL AT OUR SECOND FLOOR OF
21:51:51 CITY COUNCIL WITH OUR DAY MEETING.
21:51:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CITRO.
21:51:56 ALL IN FAVOR?
21:51:58 OPPOSED?
21:51:58 THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
21:52:00 >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO THEY HAVE LAST NAMES?
21:52:05 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY DO, BUT JIM BLEICH, I'M ASSUMING,
21:52:09 AND RAY CUESTA, BUT I HAVE EVERYTHING WRITTEN FOR THE CLERK.
21:52:11 I THINK IT'S BLEICH.
21:52:15 PEOPLE BUTCHER MY NAME ALL THE TIME, SO I TRY TO MAKE IT
21:52:18 EASY.
21:52:18 I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, STEVEN BENSON, I THINK HE'S A
21:52:24 PERSON THAT I WOULD CONTACT ON THIS, TO COME TO US UNDER
21:52:28 STAFF REPORTS, TO TELL ME OR TELL US ABOUT WHAT THE CITY
21:52:32 CODE SAYS IN REGARDS TO BUILDING QUADPLEXES AND QUADS IN THE
21:52:36 CITY OF TAMPA.
21:52:37 NEW CONSTRUCTION.
21:52:38 THE REASON I AM SAYING THIS IS WE HAVE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING
21:52:41 CRISIS, AND I WANT TO SEE IF ALLOWING OR CHANGING THE CODE,
21:52:45 OR JUST TO KNOW WHAT THE CODE IS AND TO ALLOWING THIS TYPE
21:52:48 OF NEW CONSTRUCTION, IF WE COULD JUST GET AN UPDATE, AND
21:52:53 WHAT HE SAYS.
21:52:53 I KNOW STEVEN BENSON IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THIS, AND I
21:52:58 WOULD LIKE HIM TO COME BEFORE US JULY 14th UNDER STAFF
21:53:02 REPORTS.
21:53:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND BY MR. GUDES.
21:53:08 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
21:53:11 OPPOSED?
21:53:11 THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
21:53:12 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND THE LAST THING IS, FOR OUR APRIL
21:53:15 28th WORKSHOP, I WOULD LIKE THESE ITEMS TO BE PLACED AS
21:53:20 ITEMS 3 AND 4.
21:53:22 THE FIRST ONE IS TO REVIEW THE AMENDMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE
21:53:25 PLAN AMENDMENT 16-02 AND TO REVIEW OR REVISIT THE AMENDMENT,
21:53:30 AND THEN FOR ITEM 4, DISCUSSION OF UPCOMING TEXT AMENDMENTS
21:53:34 TO INCLUDE PRIVATELY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENTS AND THE
21:53:38 PUBLICLY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO APPEAR.
21:53:41 THIS IS FOR THE APRIL 28th WORKSHOP AGENDA FOR ITEMS 3
21:53:46 AND 4.
21:53:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION BY CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO.
21:53:51 SECOND BY MR. CITRO.
21:53:53 ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION?
21:53:56 OPPOSED?
21:53:57 THE AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
21:53:58 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT.
21:54:01 MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SECOND
21:54:03 BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL RIGHT.
21:54:05 WE ARE ADJOURNED.
21:55:23 (MEETING ADJOURNED?)
21:55:25
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.