TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 2022
5:00 P.M
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
17:01:44 >>JOSEPH CITRO: GOOD EVENING.
17:01:47 THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THIS EVENING IN OUR EVENING
17:01:51 SESSION HELD ON THIS DATE, JUNE 2, 2022.
17:01:52 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:01:56 ROLL CALL, EXCUSE ME.
17:01:57 >>CLERK: CARLSON?
17:01:58 VIERA?
17:02:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
17:02:01 >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE.
17:02:02 >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE.
17:02:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
17:02:07 >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
17:02:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: WE HAVE TWO THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE
17:02:10 TO TAKE CARE OF.
17:02:10 MR. MIRANDA.
17:02:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WE HAVE MR. JOE SIMMONS.
17:02:14 IF YOU WILL COME FORWARD.
17:02:17 THE INDIVIDUAL RETIRING AND HIS LAST DAY WITH THE CITY
17:02:18 OF TAMPA.
17:02:21 HE HAS DONE A FANTASTIC JOB DOWNSTAIRS AS ONE OF THE
17:02:26 GUARDS THAT WE HAVE IN THE CITY.
17:02:32 AND HE IS LEAVING TO TAKE A RV AND GO TO THE MOUNTAINS.
17:02:34 I HOPE IT IS NOT ZEPHYRHILLS.
17:02:34 [LAUGHTER]
17:02:36 ONLY JOKING.
17:02:38 YOU KNOW HOW I AM.
17:02:39 TELL US.
17:02:41 HAVE YOU ENJOYED IT HERE?
17:02:46 >> MY NAME IS JOE SIMMONS AND WORKED WITH ALLIED
17:02:49 UNIVERSITY SECURITY AND IN CHARGE OF TAKING CARE OF
17:02:53 CITY COUNCIL AND OLD CITY HALL BUILDING AND DOWNSTAIRS.
17:02:54 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WE APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU HAVE
17:02:59 DONE FOR US AND THE CONSTITUENTS THAT COME IN A VERY
17:03:00 PLEASANT MANNER.
17:03:02 WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF THAT.
17:03:03 >> THANK YOU, SIR.
17:03:04 APPRECIATE IT.
17:03:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:03:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELL, I HATE TO SEE YOU GO.
17:03:12 IT IS ALWAYS CHEERFUL AND WE APPRECIATE YOU AND ALL
17:03:12 THAT YOU DO.
17:03:13 WE WILL CERTAINLY MISS YOU.
17:03:17 I WASN'T EXPECTING -- TODAY IS YOUR LAST DAY, BUT AS IT
17:03:21 GOES, WISH YOU THE BEST IN YOUR RETIREMENT AND WHAT DO
17:03:21 YOU.
17:03:23 AND I HOPE THAT YOU MAY LIVE TO BE 100.
17:03:27 AS FRANK SINATRA WOULD SAY, LIVE TO BE 100 AND THE LAST
17:03:30 VOICE YOU HEAR BE MINE.
17:03:33 I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ARE A SINATRA FAN, BUT I HOPE YOU
17:03:35 HAVE A LONG, LONG LIFE.
17:03:36 HEALTHY.
17:03:38 DO YOU EVERYTHING THAT YOU WANT TO DO AND ENJOY IT AND
17:03:39 HAVE A GOOD TIME.
17:03:40 YOU PAID YOUR DUES.
17:03:41 YOU WORKED HARD.
17:03:43 YOU HAVE TAKEN CARE OF US HERE.
17:03:46 WE CERTAINLY APPRECIATED SEEING YOU EVERY DAY.
17:03:49 AND WE WILL MISS SEEING YOUR FACE.
17:03:49 >> THANK YOU.
17:03:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD LUCK AND BEST TO YOU ON
17:03:52 EVERYTHING.
17:03:53 >> VERY KIND WORDS.
17:03:55 THANK YOU, SIR.
17:03:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
17:04:01 >>LYNN HURTAK: I WANT TO SAY HOW WONDERFUL IT HAS BEEN
17:04:03 FOR YOU TO HELP SETTLE ME IN.
17:04:05 ENJOY THE CONVERSATIONS IN THE MORNINGS, IN THE
17:04:06 EVENINGS.
17:04:09 I CERTAINLY WISH YOU AND I WISH YOU THE ABSOLUTE MOST
17:04:13 FUN IN THE RV WITH YOUR FAMILY AND ALL YOUR ADVENTURES.
17:04:14 >> THANK YOU, MA'AM.
17:04:15 APPRECIATE IT.
17:04:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:04:19 >>ORLANDO GUDES: APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE.
17:04:20 APPRECIATE YOU.
17:04:22 YOU ARE MR. AL.
17:04:25 GLAD MR. MIRANDA WAS ABLE TO FIND THOUGHT INFORMATION
17:04:28 AND LET US KNOW THAT YOU HAVE THE RV AND GO ON THE
17:04:28 HAPPY TRAILS.
17:04:30 I HOPE YOU HAVE FUN AND EXCITEMENT.
17:04:34 GO TO PLACES YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN BEFORE AND WHAT YOU
17:04:34 CAN DO.
17:04:36 GOD BLESS YOU.
17:04:39 >> THANK YOU, SIR, MUCH APPRECIATED.
17:04:40 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU HAVE
17:04:41 DONE.
17:04:43 NOT THAT WE WILL MISS YOU BUT MISS YOU FOR A LONG TIME
17:04:46 BECAUSE THAT RV HAS A LOT OF TRAVELLING TO DO.
17:04:52 WHAT MOUNTAINS ARE YOU GOING TO GO TO, THE CAROLINAS.
17:04:54 >> NIAGRA FALLS, GRAND CANYON.
17:04:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU WILL BE BACK AND I WILL BE 106.
17:05:00 >> I WILL BACK SOONER OR LATER.
17:05:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HAVE A GREAT TIME WITH YOUR FAMILY.
17:05:03 >> THANK YOU, APPRECIATE IT.
17:05:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU ARE FAMILY.
17:05:08 COME AND SEE US SOME TIME SOON.
17:05:09 >> HAPPY TO DO SO.
17:05:12 IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE.
17:05:16 [APPLAUSE]
17:05:19 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MISS WILCOX.
17:05:24 AS I ALWAYS SAY, ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA
17:05:27 ARE FAMILY.
17:05:32 MISS WILCOX HERE FOR -- FOR LACK OF BETTER WORDS WAS
17:05:38 FILLING IN AND NOW HER APPOINTMENT HAS BECOME OFFICIAL.
17:05:43 AND I AM GOING TO GIVE YOU THE LONG TITLE.
17:05:50 MISS SONJA WILCOX IS THE SENIOR CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK
17:05:55 SUPPORT SPECIALIST FOR TAMPA CITY COUNCIL.
17:05:59 SHE -- SHE IS NOW THE FIRST FACE YOU WILL SEE WHEN YOU
17:06:01 WALK INTO OUR OFFICE.
17:06:04 MISS WILCOX, WELCOME TO THE FAMILY.
17:06:04 >> THANK YOU.
17:06:06 [APPLAUSE]
17:06:07 >> I PREPARED SOMETHING.
17:06:09 IT WAS LIKE IMPROMPTU.
17:06:12 SO I AM PLEASED AND HONORED TO ACCEPT THE POSITION AS
17:06:16 SENIOR CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK SUPPORT SPECIALIST.
17:06:21 I BELIEVE THAT ALL THE EFFORT IN MY ENTIRE TEAM MADE ME
17:06:24 CAPABLE OF BEING CONSIDERED FOR THIS POSITION.
17:06:27 SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:06:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:06:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE ARE GLAD YOU ARE WITH US AND
17:06:33 AGAIN AS CHAIRMAN CITRO SAID, PART OF THE FAMILY AND,
17:06:36 AGAIN, YOU ARE ALWAYS SMILING, YOU ARE ALWAYS CHEERFUL.
17:06:38 ALWAYS -- I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU WHEN WE FIRST
17:06:40 WALK IN.
17:06:42 AND WE APPRECIATE ALL THAT YOU DO.
17:06:45 I KNOW IT IS NOT AN EASY JOB AND WE APPRECIATE YOU AND
17:06:46 THANK YOU.
17:06:47 >> THANK YOU.
17:06:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
17:06:52 >>LYNN HURTAK: I THOUGHT YOU WERE PERMANENT SO THIS IS
17:06:53 GREAT NEWS.
17:06:54 YOU ARE ALWAYS ON -- YOU ARE ALWAYS THERE.
17:06:56 YOU ALWAYS HAVE A SMILE.
17:06:57 AND SO WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH YOU.
17:06:59 AND I AM GLAD YOU ARE STAYING.
17:07:03 I HAD NO IDEA YOU WEREN'T PERMANENT SO YAY.
17:07:04 THIS IS GREAT NEWS.
17:07:07 >> THANK YOU.
17:07:09 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:07:11 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SURPRISES ME TOO.
17:07:14 YOU KNOW, WHAT I CAN SAY, THE PERSON YOU ARE REPLACING
17:07:20 HAS THE SAME TYPE OF HEART YOU HAD.
17:07:24 SAME TYPE OF SMILE AND MAKES EVERYONE FEEL IMPORTANT
17:07:24 AND SPECIAL.
17:07:26 GETS THE JOB DONE.
17:07:30 SO I -- I KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO DO A GREAT JOB BECAUSE
17:07:31 YOU HAVE BEEN DOING A JOB.
17:07:34 SO I SAY CONTINUE TO DO WHAT YOU DO AND I TELL YOU, YOU
17:07:37 MAKE ME HAPPY EVERY DAY, THANK YOU.
17:07:40 >> THANK YOU.
17:07:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:07:43 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE FIRST ONES THAT I SEE.
17:07:47 WALK AROUND AND GREET YOU AND SAY GOOD MORNING.
17:07:53 I COME BACK TO GRAB A CUP OF COFFEE AND I SAY THE PAPER
17:07:53 THERE YET.
17:07:56 I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO ON A DAILY BASIS.
17:07:57 THE FIRST ONE TO GREET YOU.
17:08:00 AND I APPRECIATE YOU AND WHAT YOU DO AND THE
17:08:03 CHARISMATIC WAY YOU DO IT.
17:08:04 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
17:08:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN VIERA.
17:08:08 >>LUIS VIERA: CONGRATULATIONS AND YOU ARE ALWAYS A
17:08:09 VERY NICE PERSON.
17:08:11 I HAD TO PLEASURE OF ALSO MEETING YOUR CHILD AND YOU
17:08:14 ARE JUST A VERY WARM, GOOD PERSON WITH GOOD VALUES.
17:08:17 SO GLAD TO HAVE YOU ON BOARD.
17:08:19 I WALKED IN LATE BECAUSE OF A CALL.
17:08:22 OUR FRIEND JOE WILL MISS YA.
17:08:23 AND WHAT NOT.
17:08:24 YOU ARE A GOOD PERSON.
17:08:27 AGED GOTTEN TO TALK TO YOU A FEW TIMES AND GET TO KNOW
17:08:30 YOU AND YOU TOLD ME BEFORE THAT -- MAY I DISCUSS YOUR
17:08:33 -- WHAT YOU HAD SAID YOU WERE PLANNING ON DOING IN
17:08:35 RETIREMENT?
17:08:36 >> YES.
17:08:38 >>LUIS VIERA: YOU ARE LIKE WHAT I DID TELL HIM.
17:08:43 >> IT SAID HE WILL GO ON AN RV TRIP WHICH IS JUST
17:08:43 AWESOME.
17:08:45 WE ARE HAPPY FOR THAT.
17:08:47 YOU DID 25 YEARS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.
17:08:48 SO JUST GOD BLESS YOU.
17:08:51 I KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO DO WELL.
17:08:51 THANK YOU.
17:08:53 AND CONGRATULATIONS.
17:08:54 >> THANK YOU.
17:08:54 >> THANK YOU.
17:09:03 [APPLAUSE]
17:09:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU GOING TO TELL US IF WE HAVE
17:09:08 ANY CHANGES TO OUR AGENDA?
17:09:09 >> YES, YES.
17:09:10 GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL.
17:09:13 LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
17:09:16 IF I MAY, I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR THE AGENDA FOR THIS
17:09:16 EVENING.
17:09:19 ITEM NUMBER 1, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A
17:09:23 CONTINUANCE TO THE JUNE 23, 2022 HEARING OPINION AND
17:09:26 THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT.
17:09:28 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
17:09:29 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE.
17:09:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:09:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU WANT THEM TO BE DONE FIRST?
17:09:48 WOULD YOU -- I AM SORRY?
17:09:49 OKAY.
17:09:51 I APOLOGIZE.
17:09:53 YOU SEE, I AM -- I AM WORKING.
17:09:53 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:09:57 MISS SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ.
17:10:03 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
17:10:07 THE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IN THE THIRD FLOOR.
17:10:09 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD IN TAMPA, FLORIDA.
17:10:12 THE PUBLIC IS ABLE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING IN PERSON OR
17:10:16 VIEW IT VIA CABLE TELEVISION ON SPECTRUM 640 OR
17:10:22 FRONTIER CHANNEL 15 OR BY THE INTERNET VISA INTERNET
17:10:25 TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
17:10:28 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE IN QUASI JUDICIAL
17:10:33 IN PERSON, IN CITY COUNCIL, OR REMOTELY THROUGH
17:10:36 COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR CMT AND CELL PHONES
17:10:41 AND SMARTPHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE BECAUSE DO NOT ALLOW
17:10:42 YOUR CAMERA.
17:10:44 YOU MUST HAVE A TABLET OR COMPUTER EQUIPPED WITH A
17:10:47 CAMERA OR MICROPHONE THAT WILL ENABLE YOU TO BE SEEN
17:10:51 AND HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL AND ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN
17:10:54 A QUASI-JUDICIAL MANNER.
17:10:56 I COULD PLEASE HAVE A MOTION WAIVING THE CITY COUNCIL
17:11:00 RULES AND PROCEDURES TO ALLOW PUBLIC COMMENT BY CMT.
17:11:02 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:11:03 SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:11:05 ALL IN FAVOR.
17:11:07 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
17:11:09 >>LACHONE DOCK: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:11:11 LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION OPINION IF
17:11:14 I MAY, I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR THE AGENDA FOR THE
17:11:14 EVENING.
17:11:17 ITEM NUMBER 1, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A
17:11:20 CONTINUANCE TO A JUNE 23, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING.
17:11:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CONTINUE.
17:11:23 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:11:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:11:28 SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
17:11:29 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:11:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:11:32 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:11:33 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:11:35 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:11:35 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:11:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:11:41 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
17:11:42 ABSENT.
17:11:43 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
17:11:45 ITEM NUMBER 4 CANNOT BE HEARD.
17:11:47 THIS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
17:11:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION TO MOVE REZ-22-14.
17:11:53 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:11:56 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:11:58 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:12:00 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:12:01 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:12:02 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:12:03 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:12:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:12:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:12:09 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
17:12:09 ABSENT.
17:12:13 >>LACHONE DOCK: LAST, COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 6.
17:12:15 NUMBER 6 CANNOT BE HEARD.
17:12:18 NOTICE CANNOT BE EFFECTED.
17:12:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:12:23 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:12:24 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:12:25 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:12:26 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:12:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:12:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:12:28 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:12:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:12:35 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
17:12:35 ABSENT.
17:12:38 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH, COUNCIL.
17:12:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF ONLINE?
17:12:42 BECAUSE IF I AM GOING TO ASK FOR EVERYONE TO BE SWORN
17:12:46 IN, I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO DO IT ONE TIME TONIGHT.
17:12:49 ANYONE WHO IS GOING TO BE GIVING TESTIMONY IN THESE
17:12:52 PROCEEDINGS TONIGHT, WOULD YOU PLEASE RISE TO BE SWORN
17:12:56 IN.
17:13:02 [SWEARING IN]
17:13:04 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:13:08 FIRST ITEM TODAY IS ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE NUMBER
17:13:13 REZ-20-66.
17:13:14 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:13:17 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO OPEN ALL THE PUBLIC
17:13:18 HEARINGS ONE THROUGH EIGHT.
17:13:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I KNOW.
17:13:21 MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:13:23 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
17:13:26 ALL IN FAVOR.
17:13:30 AGAIN REZ-20-66.
17:13:32 >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
17:13:34 FOR THE RECORD, CATE WELLS WITH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
17:13:39 THIS ITEM WAS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 24, 2022 AS
17:13:42 A RESULT OF THE MEDIATION PROCESS THAT WE WENT THROUGH
17:13:48 PURSUANT TO SECTION 70.51 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTE.
17:13:50 AT THAT TIME WE PRESENTED THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE'S
17:13:55 PROPOSED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING THAT
17:13:57 THE SETTLEMENT PRESENTED TO YOU ON THAT DATE BE
17:13:57 ACCEPTED.
17:14:00 IF YOU RECALL, THAT SETTLEMENT INCLUDED TWO ALTERNATIVE
17:14:03 SITE PLANS.
17:14:08 ONE ASSUMING THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATORS, THE OPERATOR OF
17:14:11 THE MANUFACTURING PLANT IMMEDIATELY CONTIGUOUS TO THIS
17:14:15 PARCEL WOULD REMAIN IN PLAY.
17:14:17 AND THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN PRESUMED THAT
17:14:20 CHEMICAL FORMULATORS WOULD RELOCATE.
17:14:25 AS A RESULT OF THAT CONTINGENCY, THE SITE PLANS
17:14:29 PRESENTED DIFFERENT DESIGN OPTIONS.
17:14:32 THAT SETTLEMENT WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
17:14:35 AND SECOND READING WAS SCHEDULED ON MAY 5.
17:14:40 AT THAT TIME, THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL ASKED THAT
17:14:44 SECOND READING BE CONTINUED UNTIL TODAY TO ALLOW MINOR
17:14:47 MODIFICATIONS TO THIS SITE PLAN, AND THAT IS WHAT STAFF
17:14:50 WILL BE ADDRESSING DURING THEIR PRESENTATION AND WHAT
17:14:54 THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL WILL BE PRESENTING AS WELL.
17:14:57 THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE REVIEWED THOSE MODIFICATIONS TO
17:15:00 THE SITE PLAN AND FOUND THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL TO THE
17:15:03 SETTLEMENT AND CONTINUES TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND
17:15:06 SCOTT STEADY, OUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I BELIEVE, IS
17:15:09 REGISTERED ONLINE AND AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
17:15:10 IF COUNCIL HAS THEM.
17:15:14 HE DID NOT INTEND TO MAKE A PRESENTATION.
17:15:18 ONCE STAFF PRESENTS THE CASE AND YOU HEAR FROM
17:15:21 PETITIONER -- APPLICANT OR THE PETITION AND MEMBERS OF
17:15:24 THE PUBLIC, IT IS THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION THAT CITY
17:15:28 COUNCIL ACCEPT THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE
17:15:31 PLAN UNDER THAT PLACE THE ORDINANCE BACK ON FIRST
17:15:32 READING.
17:15:35 THE REASON WE HAVE TO DO THAT PROCEDURALLY, THE
17:15:38 MODIFICATIONS GO BEYOND THOSE THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR
17:15:40 REVISION SHEET ON MARCH 24.
17:15:45 THUS, STAFF WAS UNABLE TO CERTIFIED THE SITE PLAN FOR
17:15:46 SECOND READ BE.
17:15:49 A TECHNOLOGY FULL, BUT WE WILL BE ADDRESSING --
17:15:55 TONIGHT, WE WILL FOCUS ON THOSE REVISIONS RATHER THAN
17:15:58 DOING A FULL-BLOWN PRESENTATION.
17:15:59 I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
17:16:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
17:16:02 >>CATE WELLS: OKAY.
17:16:05 THANK YOU.
17:16:08 >>LACHONE DOCK: LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT
17:16:09 COORDINATION.
17:16:13 THIS ITEM IS REZ-20-66.
17:16:16 FOR THE PROPERTY 5301 W. TYSON AVENUE.
17:16:20 THE APPLICANT IS WOODFIELD ACQUISITIONS LCC.
17:16:25 THEY ARE BEING REPRESENTED BY ANN POLLACK.
17:16:28 THE REQUEST IS REZONING FROM IH TO PD PLANNED
17:16:31 DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND MULTIUSES
17:16:32 ON-SITE.
17:16:36 SO THE REVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN AGREED UPON BETWEEN THE
17:16:40 APPLICANT AND STAFF THAT HAVE BEEN WORKED ON.
17:16:43 I WANTED TO REVIEW THE LIST WITH YOU.
17:16:45 THE ORIGINAL REVISIONS THAT WERE REQUESTED WITH THE
17:16:49 ORIGINAL HEARING AND THE ORIGINAL STAFF REPORT.
17:16:52 THOSE ARE ON PAGE SEVEN AND EIGHT OF THE STAFF REPORT
17:16:53 PACKET.
17:16:55 THOSE REVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE SITE PLAN.
17:16:58 AND THE ADDITIONAL REVISIONS WHAT I WILL REVIEW WITH
17:17:01 YOU TODAY THAT WILL BE ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
17:17:03 READING IF THIS IS APPROVED.
17:17:09 SO THE FIRST REVISION IS THE WITHDRAWAL OF ALTERNATIVE
17:17:10 ONE SITE PLAN.
17:17:14 TWO ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED AS CATE MENTIONED.
17:17:17 THE APPLICANT HAS WITHDRAWN THE FIRST ALTERNATIVE AND
17:17:19 WILL GO WITH ALTERNATIVE TWO SITE PLAN.
17:17:21 THEY WILL ADD THE TWO ACCESS CONNECTIONS ALONG THE
17:17:22 WEST.
17:17:25 AND THIS IS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE.
17:17:30 THEY ARE GOING TO UPDATE THEIR LAND USE BUFFER WAIVER.
17:17:33 AND UPDATE THEIR TREE MITIGATION AND TREE CALCULATIONS.
17:17:37 THEY ARE ADDING A NOTE WITHIN THE SITE PLAN ITSELF.
17:17:40 AND THIS IS A TRANSPORTATION-RELATED NOTE.
17:17:43 THIS NOTE ALLOWS THEM THE FLEXIBILITY TO MOVE THEIR
17:17:45 ACCESS POINTS ON THE WEST.
17:17:48 RIGHT NOW THEIR POINTS WILL ALIGN TO THE PROPERTY ON
17:17:48 THE WEST.
17:17:51 IF FOR ANY REASON AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING THAT
17:17:55 PROPERTY TO THE WEST HAVE TO ADJUST THEIR ACCESS POINTS
17:17:59 FOR ANY REASON, STORMWATER, LANDSCAPING, WHATEVER MAY
17:18:01 ARISE.
17:18:04 THIS ALLOWS THE APPLICANT TO ADJUST THE PLACEMENT OF
17:18:08 THEIR ACCESS POINTS TO ALIGN WITH THEM.
17:18:11 AT THIS POINT, ONCE THIS APPROVED, THEY CAN NOT HAVE
17:18:13 ANY MODIFICATIONS.
17:18:17 AND THIS NOTE GIVES THEM THAT FLEXIBILITY.
17:18:20 THE NEXT NOTE WHICH IS ON -- NUMBER C ON REVISION SHEET
17:18:24 IS THE NUMBER OF STORIES IN THE PARKING GARAGE.
17:18:28 THE PARKING -- THE GARAGE THAT IS PROPOSED, THE
17:18:31 STORIES BE MODIFIED BUT THE HEIGHT WILL REMAIN THE
17:18:32 SAME.
17:18:37 THIS ALLOWS FOR THE NUMBER OF COMPACT SPACES PROVIDED,
17:18:39 THE NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED, AND THE BUILDING HEIGHT
17:18:41 WILL REMAIN THE SAME.
17:18:45 AND THEN CONDITION NUMBER 21 WOULD BE REVISED.
17:18:47 AND THIS IS A NOTE FROM THE DEVELOPER WHICH I WOULD
17:18:50 READ INTO THE RECORD THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOT MOVE
17:18:53 IN RESIDENCE TO THE PROJECT UNTIL AFTER CHEMICAL
17:19:01 FORMULATORS, INC. CF I TERMINATES THE BLEACH AND
17:19:03 MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS ON THE PARCEL IDENTIFIED AS
17:19:09 THIS FOLIO 1 3.85.850.
17:19:13 AND LARGE QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USED FOR
17:19:15 SUCH OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PARCEL.
17:19:20 IN ANY EVENT MOVEMENT AFTER DECEMBER 21, 2023.
17:19:22 AND TERMINATION OF BLEACH MANUFACTURING AND CHLORINE
17:19:24 PACKAGING.
17:19:28 OPERATION SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION
17:19:31 OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE FOR A QUALIFIED THIRD PARTY WITH
17:19:34 EXPERIENCE IN SUCH OPERATIONS OR BY DEVELOPERS WRITTEN
17:19:38 CONFIRMATION THAT CFI HAS VACATED THE PARCEL.
17:19:40 AND THOSE ARE THE CHANGES THAT WILL BE MADE BETWEEN
17:19:43 FIRST AND SECOND READING ON THE SITE PLAN.
17:19:46 I AM AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, COUNCIL.
17:19:49 AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT.
17:19:52 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
17:19:54 MAY I ASK ONE.
17:19:58 AND I AM -- I AM REFERRING BACK TO WHEN THIS WAS HEARD
17:19:59 BEFORE.
17:20:04 THERE WAS A DESIGNATED ENTRANCE AND EXIT FROM PROPERTY
17:20:13 TO PROPERTY AND THAT HAS ALL CHANGED NOW?
17:20:15 I WILL LET THE PETITIONER ANSWER THAT.
17:20:16 THANK YOU.
17:20:18 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:20:24 ANNE POLLACK, FLETCHER, POLLACK IN ST. PETE.
17:20:28 I AM JUST GOING TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE OVERVIEW.
17:20:30 WE ARE BACK HERE.
17:20:33 I HAVE GOT MY WHOLE TEAM IN CASE YOU HAVE QUESTIONS,
17:20:36 BUT WE ARE HERE JUST TO ADDRESS THESE CHANGES.
17:20:43 JUST A REMINDER OF THE MIXED USE PROJECT THAT WE ARE
17:20:44 HERE.
17:20:46 WHEN WE CAME IN MARCH WE GAVE YOU THE TWO SITE PLANS
17:20:47 ADVISED OVER THE PAST YEAR.
17:20:51 WE REDUCED DENSITY SIGNIFICANTLY WITH WHAT HAS BEEN
17:20:56 APPROVED FOR THE REST OF THE AREA THAT WE ARE TALKING
17:20:56 ABOUT.
17:21:00 WE ADDED MANY MITIGATION-BASED MEASURES IN OUR FIRST
17:21:03 ALTERNATIVE TO REFLECT THE FACT THAT WE WERE ADJACENT
17:21:10 TO CFI, AND DID YOU SUPPORT THOSE CHANGES TODAY, THE
17:21:16 REASON WE ARE HERE IS BECAUSE WHAT WE DISCOVERED AFTER
17:21:19 THE FIRST READING THAT THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY
17:21:28 SOUTHEASTERN THAT YOU APPROVED THIS MORNING.
17:21:31 HAD TWO ACCESS POINTS CONNECTED TO OUR PROPERTY AND
17:21:38 OURS HAD ONE THAT WENT THIS WAY AND THEY DIDN'T ALIGN.
17:21:42 NOW TWO DRIVEWAYS ALIGN AND THAT WAS A BIG ENOUGH
17:21:44 CHANGE TO COME BACK TO FIRST READING.
17:21:49 AGAIN THERE IS THAT CONTINUE THAT ALLOWS US IF THE
17:21:52 DRIVEWAYS NEED TO BE TWEAKED SLIGHTLY, WE CAN DO THAT
17:22:01 AT PERMITTING.
17:22:04 THE SECOND CHANGE IS MORE SIGNIFICANT AND I HOPE YOU
17:22:06 APPRECIATE WHAT WE HAVE DONE.
17:22:09 WHEN THEY HAD THE FIRST READING AND PURCHASED THE CFI
17:22:12 PROPERTY, WE WERE FOUND THAT WE WERE ABLE TO DO WHAT
17:22:17 COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON ASKED US AT THE FIRST MEETING, IF
17:22:20 YOU RECALL, WHICH IS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SECOND
17:22:24 ALTERNATIVE WHICH WOULD ASSUME THAT CFI HAD LEFT.
17:22:28 AT THAT TIME, WE DID NOT HAVE THE FACTS TO GIVE US THE
17:22:31 CONFIDENCE AND ACCEPT THAT RISK OF MOVING FORWARD, BUT
17:22:35 SUBSEQUENT OF THEIR HEARING AND LEARNING MORE AND GET A
17:22:38 COPY OF THE DEED WHICH WAS SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD WE
17:22:40 LEARNED THAT THEY HAD ACTUALLY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY.
17:22:44 THEY HAD ACTUALLY ENTERED INTO A LEASE WITH CFI THAT
17:22:48 WOULD ALLOW CFI TO BE THERE BUT ONLY FOR TWO YEARS.
17:22:52 THE LEASE EXPIRES IN DECEMBER OF 2023.
17:22:58 WITH THAT, AND I BELIEVE YOU HEARD FROM ELISE BATSEL
17:23:00 THAT REPRESENTS SOUTHEASTERN.
17:23:03 SHE SHOULD BE ON THE LINE IF YOU NEED TO HEAR THAT
17:23:04 AGAIN.
17:23:06 WE FELT WITH THAT AND THEY SUBMITTING THE COMPREHENSIVE
17:23:11 PLAN AMENDMENT THAT WE WERE OKAY WITH DRAWING THE
17:23:14 ALTERNATIVE THAT ASSUMED CFI WOULD STAY AND MOVING
17:23:18 FORWARD WITH THE AT I HAVE THAT REQUIRED CFI TO LEAVE.
17:23:19 TO CEASE THEIR OPERATIONS.
17:23:23 SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE DONE TONIGHT IS JUST THAT SECOND
17:23:25 ALTERNATIVE.
17:23:30 AND WE DO HAVE A CONDITION ON THE PLAN WHICH LACHONE
17:23:35 READ TO YOU WHICH WOULD LIMIT US FROM MOVING IN OUR
17:23:40 RESIDENCE UNTIL THEY HAVE CEASED THEIR OPERATIONS.
17:23:43 UNTIL QUANTITIES OF CHLORINE WERE OFF THE SITE AND IT
17:23:48 WAS SAFE FOR THE RESIDENTS TO MOVE ON TO THE PROPERTY.
17:23:52 WE WOULD -- WOODFIELD FEELS CONFIDENT AS THE CONTRACT
17:23:57 PURCHASER THAT THEY CAN WORK WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES OF
17:23:58 THE CFI LEASE.
17:24:02 THAT GIVEN WHERE WE ARE NOW, CONSTRUCTION WILL.
17:24:07 LET'S SAY IT STARTS IN 2023, IT WILL BE SOME TIME UNTIL
17:24:09 AFTER DECEMBER OF 2023 THAT WE NEED TO MOVE IN AND WE
17:24:12 FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH DOING THIS.
17:24:15 THE THIRD CHANGE THAT WE ARE DOING SINCE WE HAVE TO
17:24:20 COME BEFORE YOU FOR THE OTHER CHANGE WAS TO JUST ALLOW
17:24:22 FOR US TO HAVE A FIFTH STORY.
17:24:27 WE CURRENTLY SHOW A 60-FOOT HIGHLIGHT.
17:24:30 BUT OUR PLAN THROUGHOUT SAYS FOUR STORIES FOR THE
17:24:33 PARKING GARAGE AND WE WANTED THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT IN
17:24:35 A FIFTH STORY WITHIN THAT PARKING GARAGE.
17:24:37 WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR A CHANGE IN THE HEIGHT.
17:24:41 WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR A CHANGE ACTUALLY IN OUR
17:24:44 ELEVATIONS WHICH WE SHOW ON THE PLAN AS HAVING FIVE
17:24:45 STORIES.
17:24:51 IT WOULD BE THE SAME MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT.
17:24:54 THIS IS JUST AN IMAGE OF THAT SITE PLAN, AND YOU CAN
17:25:00 SEE THE TWO DRIVEWAYS HERE.
17:25:03 I WASN'T SURE IF I NEEDED TO RE-EMPHASIZE IT AGAIN,
17:25:06 BUT WE DO HAVE A WAIVER ON THE WEST SIDE FOR
17:25:11 LANDSCAPING BECAUSE OF THE NARROW DRIVEWAY AND THE
17:25:15 OPTION AND THE GOAL OF PRESERVING TREES AND PUTTING IN
17:25:15 A SIDEWALK.
17:25:18 REQUESTED A WAIVER FROM THE 15 FEET REQUIRED BEING
17:25:22 ADJACENT TO AN INDUSTRIAL SITE TO TEN FEET WITH THE
17:25:25 PROMISE WE WOULD PUT IN ALL 15 FEET WORTH OF
17:25:26 LANDSCAPING IN THAT TEN FEET.
17:25:29 NOW WITH SOUTHEASTERN MOVING FORWARD, ULTIMATELY THEIR
17:25:34 USE WILL BE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL, BECAUSE THEIR
17:25:38 USE ISN'T RESIDENTIAL QUITE YET AND IT IS A USE-TO-USE
17:25:44 BUFFER NOT A ZONING-TO-ZONING BUFFER, WE ARE REQUESTING
17:25:45 THIS WAIVER.
17:25:48 SO LASTLY, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT WE
17:25:54 APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT IN THE PAST AND WE HAVE -- WE
17:25:58 FEEL THAT WE HAVE MADE A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE BY
17:26:04 WITHDRAWING OUR FIRST ALTERNATIVE.
17:26:06 COUNCILMAN CARLSON WHO VOTED TO DENY SPECIFICALLY ASKED
17:26:07 FOR THIS.
17:26:10 AND WE ARE HAPPY THAT WE ARE ABLE TO DO THIS.
17:26:15 COUNCILMAN -- CHAIR CITRO, YOU HAD SPOKEN HOW YOU
17:26:18 WEREN'T AGAINST DEVELOPMENT ON RATTLESNAKE POINT.
17:26:22 YOU WEREN'T AGAINST THIS DEVELOPMENT PER SE, BUT YOU
17:26:24 WERE AGAINST THE IDEA OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS REMAINING
17:26:27 THERE AND THE RESIDENTS MOVING NEXT DOOR.
17:26:29 WITH THIS PLAN AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TONIGHT THAT
17:26:31 WILL NOT HAPPEN.
17:26:33 WE HOPE THAT WILL ENCOURAGE TO YOU SUPPORT THE PROJECT
17:26:34 TONIGHT.
17:26:36 AND THE REST OF YOU AS WELL.
17:26:38 SO I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
17:26:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE?
17:26:47 AND THE -- THE CHEMICAL PLANT NEXT DOOR.
17:26:50 IT HAS BEEN SOLD?
17:26:52 >> IT HAS BEEN SOLD.
17:27:02 THEY PURCHASED IT IN DECEMBER.
17:27:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: CONSTRUCTION IS NOT GOING TO START
17:27:06 UNTIL EVERYTHING IS SETTLED ON THAT?
17:27:08 >> THE CONSTRUCTION MAY START.
17:27:09 DEVELOPMENT MAY START.
17:27:12 BUT A CO, FOR INSTANCE, CANNOT BE ISSUED.
17:27:16 RESIDENTS CANNOT MOVE IN UNTIL -- UNTIL THE -- UNTIL
17:27:20 THEIR OPERATIONS HAVE CEASED.
17:27:24 AND I BELIEVE THAT IS WHAT SOUTHEASTERN IS -- IS
17:27:31 PREPARING AS WELL BUT IF EVERYONE IS SUPPORTIVE, I
17:27:35 SPOKE WITH STEPHANIE POYNOR TODAY.
17:27:38 SHE ADVISED SHE IS NOT COMING TONIGHT.
17:27:42 SHE IS VERY GLAD TO HEAR THAT CFI IS LEAVING AND NOT
17:27:50 GOING TO SPEAK AGAINST OUR PROJECT TONIGHT.
17:27:52 >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE?
17:27:55 ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
17:27:58 COMMENTS OR GIVE TESTIMONY?
17:28:01 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE?
17:28:03 >>CLERK: WE HAVE ONE PERSON REGISTERED STEPHANIE
17:28:07 POYNOR BUT SHE E-MAILED ME SHE NO LONGER WANTED TO
17:28:09 SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
17:28:11 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE.
17:28:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
17:28:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
17:28:14 THANK YOU.
17:28:18 MR. MIRANDA, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:28:22 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THIS IS FIRST READING, CORRECT?
17:28:32 FILE NUMBER REZ-20-66.
17:28:34 SUBSTITUTE.
17:28:37 MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING.
17:28:42 FOR SECTION 70.51 FLORIDA STATUTES ACCEPTING A SPECIAL
17:28:44 MAGISTRATE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REZONING
17:28:49 PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5301 W. TYSON
17:28:53 AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
17:28:56 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 FROM ZONING
17:28:59 DISTRICT IH, INDUSTRIAL HEAVY TO PD, PLANNED
17:29:03 DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, RETAIL SALES,
17:29:06 SPECIALTY GOODS, CONVENIENCE GOODS, SHOPPER'S GOODS AND
17:29:07 MARINA.
17:29:09 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:29:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:29:12 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:29:14 ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
17:29:16 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:29:17 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:29:18 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:29:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:29:21 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:29:23 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:29:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:29:27 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
17:29:28 ABSENT.
17:29:32 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 14,
17:29:34 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
17:29:45 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
17:29:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO: DID YOU -- I APOLOGIZE ONE SECOND,
17:29:48 PLEASE.
17:29:49 COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:29:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I READ WHAT IS HERE.
17:29:54 THE SUBSTITUTE.
17:29:57 YOU WANT ME TO READ THIS?
17:30:01 THE WHOLE THING?
17:30:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST
17:30:04 READING --
17:30:06 >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, NO.
17:30:08 DO YOU WANT TO GIVE SPECIFICS?
17:30:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SORRY, I DID NOT DO THAT.
17:30:12 I APOLOGIZE.
17:30:14 I THOUGHT EVERYTHING HAD BEEN WORKED OUT SO OFTEN THAT
17:30:24 I DIDN'T HAVE TO READ THAT, BUT EVIDENTLY, I WAS WRONG.
17:30:33 MOVE AN ORDINANCE NUMBER REZ 20-66 AND IN THE REVISION
17:30:37 SHEET SHOWN AND REVISIONS MADE TO PROVIDE COMPETENT AND
17:30:39 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AND
17:30:42 CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH
17:30:44 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CITY CODE, AND I FOUND THE
17:30:48 REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PUBLIC
17:30:51 HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE.
17:30:54 ALSO THE PETITIONER IS NO LONGER PURSUING ALTERNATIVE
17:30:59 SITE PLANS AND WILL ONLY PURSUE DEVELOPMENT TO HAVE CFI
17:31:02 TO CEASE OPERATION FROM ITS CURRENT LOCATION.
17:31:06 NOT NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH LAND ZONING 8.11.5 WHICH
17:31:09 WOULD HAVE REQUIRED THE PETITIONER TO DEMONSTRATE
17:31:12 THROUGH DESIGN AND ACCEPTED PRACTICES THAT THE
17:31:19 APPLICANT OF THE PROPOSE USE SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY AT
17:31:22 RISK FROM THE POTENTIAL HAZARD OF THE ABUTTING
17:31:23 PROPERTY.
17:31:25 THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED
17:31:31 THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE
17:31:34 CATEGORY AND COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE FOR OTHER
17:31:36 PROPERTIES ON RATTLESNAKE POINT.
17:31:38 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
17:31:41 PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE
17:31:44 ON LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE
17:31:45 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:31:51 PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFICIENT AND SUBSTANTIAL USE
17:31:54 OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
17:31:55 WAIVERS.
17:31:57 THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND,
17:31:59 THEREFORE, IN NEED OF WAIVERS.
17:32:01 THE REQUESTED WAIVERS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE
17:32:06 WITH THE INJURIOUS RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTIES
17:32:08 WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
17:32:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, YOU SECONDED
17:32:12 THAT MOTION.
17:32:17 ARE THOSE CONDITIONS -- COUNCILMAN GUDES, I AM SORRY,
17:32:18 THIS THEY ALL RIGHT WITH YOU.
17:32:20 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:32:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
17:32:24 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.
17:32:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MY APOLOGIES.
17:32:32 >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: MR. CHAIR, YOU DID HAVE
17:32:36 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS SUBMIT FLOOD THE RECORD,
17:32:39 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
17:32:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO: RECEIVE AND FILE.
17:32:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: RECEIVE AND FILE ALL THE DOCUMENTS
17:32:47 SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL LEGAL STAFF AND TO EVERYONE
17:32:47 CONCERNED.
17:32:49 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
17:32:53 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3, REZ-22-10.
17:32:57 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, LACHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT
17:32:57 COORDINATION.
17:33:01 ITEM 3, REZ 22-10.
17:33:05 PROPERTY LOCATED 2801 NORTH TAMPA STREET.
17:33:08 THE APPLICANT IS CHARITABLE FAITH, INC. AND REPRESENTED
17:33:09 BY WILLIAM MALLOY.
17:33:14 THE REQUEST IS FROM RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
17:33:16 CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:33:18 AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO -- OKAY, TO PLANNING
17:33:20 COMMISSION TO DO THEIR REPORT.
17:33:26 THANK YOU.
17:33:29 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:33:31 SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:33:32 I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
17:33:35 THE TAMPA CENTRAL PLANS DISTRICT.
17:33:39 CLOSEST TRANSIT IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE
17:33:41 ON NORTH TAMPA STREET AND THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL
17:33:44 FACILITIES ONE-HALF MILE NORTHWEST OF THE SITE AND THE
17:33:49 SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
17:33:52 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:33:56 IT IS LOCATED A FEW BLOCKS NORTH OF COLUMBUS DRIVE AT
17:34:01 THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH TAMPA STREET AND GLADYS
17:34:02 STREET.
17:34:05 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED WITH TOWN HOMES AND MULTIFAMILY.
17:34:07 YOU CAN SEE THE MULTIFAMILY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET
17:34:10 FROM THE SUBJECT SITE OVER HERE, OVER HERE, AND DOWN
17:34:15 OVER THIS WAY AND THE TOWN HOMES ARE OVER ON THIS SIDE.
17:34:18 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
17:34:21 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLIVED IN PURPLE.
17:34:24 THE SUBJECT SITE FEATURE LAND USES, RESIDENTIAL-20.
17:34:28 YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE CLOSE TO THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
17:34:32 35 REPRESENTED BY RED TO THE EAST OF THE SITE ALONG
17:34:33 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
17:34:36 ONCE GET AWAY FROM THE TAMPA AND FLORIDA CORRIDOR RIGHT
17:34:40 HERE, YOU CAN SEE THIS IN THE ORANGEISH COLOR THE R-10
17:34:43 LAND USE DESIGNATION WHICH IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER.
17:34:47 R-20 IS MAINLY FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND NEIGHBORHOOD
17:34:50 USES CAN BE CONSIDERED WHEN CONSISTENT WITH CRITERIA
17:34:52 SUMP AS THIS ONE.
17:34:55 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND A FOUND NO ADVERSE
17:34:59 IMPACTS AND SUBJECT TO NORTH TAMPA STREET AND ARTERIAL
17:35:00 ROAD.
17:35:04 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SAID IT MEET CRITERIA.
17:35:08 THE APPLICANT SHOULD ENSURE THE SITE IS APPROPRIATELY
17:35:11 BUFFERED AND SENSITIVE TO THE RESIDENTIAL USES.
17:35:14 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A MIX OF USES NEIGHBORHOOD
17:35:16 SERVING COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN THE CITY'S URBAN
17:35:19 VILLAGES, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, ZONING DISTRICT,
17:35:23 THE NEIGHBORHOOD INCURRING USES OF THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
17:35:26 VILLAGE THAT IS SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:35:28 I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
17:35:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
17:35:36 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
17:35:38 LACHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
17:35:41 THE PROPERTY 2801 NORTH TAMPA STREET.
17:35:43 THE REQUEST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
17:35:46 THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 15,000 SQUARE
17:35:49 FEET, .34 ACRE.
17:35:51 AND CURRENTLY THE SITE HAS A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS
17:35:54 ASSEMBLY ON-SITE.
17:35:58 I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU AN AERIAL OF THE LOCATION.
17:36:01 SO THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS LOCATED HERE IN THE RED
17:36:03 DOTTED AREA.
17:36:07 TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS MAP, THIS IS TAMPA FEET.
17:36:09 FLORIBRASKA IS TO THE NORTH.
17:36:12 WARREN AVENUE BORDERS THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
17:36:14 GLADYS STREET IS TO THE SOUTH.
17:36:16 AND THEN THIS IS FLORIDA AVENUE.
17:36:20 AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY
17:36:24 RM-16 ZONING AND YOU RUN ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE, THE
17:36:28 ZONING ACTUALLY TRANSITIONS TO COMMERCIAL AND
17:36:31 COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ZONING ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE.
17:36:33 AND ON THE SITE PHOTOS, I WILL START WITH THE NORTHERN
17:36:35 PART OF THE PROPERTY.
17:36:36 SHOW YOU THE WEST.
17:36:36 THE SOUTH.
17:36:39 AND THEN CIRCLE AROUND TO THE SURROUNDING USES AND COME
17:36:51 BACK TO THE SITE LET'S SEE IF I CAN ZOOM IN ON THE
17:36:51 PICTURES.
17:36:53 THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE.
17:36:56 THIS IS ON WARREN.
17:36:58 THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE NORTH END OF THE SITE.
17:36:59 THIS IS TAMPA STREET.
17:37:02 IT IS IN THE PITCHER TO THE LEFT.
17:37:04 THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
17:37:08 ON THE NORTH.
17:37:11 THIS IS THE FRONT OF THE SITE WHICH IS THE WEST END OF
17:37:12 THE SITE THAT IS ON.
17:37:22 THIS IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE ON GLADYS.
17:37:27 THIS IS THE TRUE ON GLADYS IF YOU ARE LOOKING EAST.
17:37:28 WITH THE PICTURE ON THE TOP.
17:37:32 THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE ON GLADYS.
17:37:36 FURTHER EAST ON GLADYS.
17:37:39 AND THIS IS WHEN WE CIRCLE AROUND THE BLOCK.
17:37:44 THIS IS ON WARREN BUT EAST OF THE SITE.
17:37:46 WEST OF THE SITE ACROSS THE STREET, THAT IS THE
17:37:50 NORTHWEST CORNER OF TAMPA AND GLADYS.
17:37:52 WEST OF THE SITE ALSO.
17:37:53 AND THEN THIS IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE.
17:37:56 THIS IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF.
17:38:08 LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND
17:38:08 FINDS CONSISTENT.
17:38:12 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COUNCIL.
17:38:15 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
17:38:19 PETITIONER.
17:38:24 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS, WILLIAM MALLOY, 325
17:38:29 SOUTH BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
17:38:31 I DON'T WANT TO CONFUSE THE STAFF'S REPORT.
17:38:33 EUCLIDIAN CONDITIONS.
17:38:33 NO CONDITIONS.
17:38:36 NO WAIVERS FOR ME TO FUSS WITH.
17:38:38 WE ARE VERY HAPPY WITH STAFF'S SUPPORT AND THEIR
17:38:39 SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT.
17:38:42 AND I AM HAPPY TO BE HERE AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT
17:38:43 YOU MAY HAVE.
17:38:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
17:38:48 IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
17:38:52 THIS?
17:38:53 SEEING NONE.
17:38:56 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON LINE?
17:38:59 SAITH MOTION CAN I COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:39:00 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
17:39:02 ALL IN FAVOR.
17:39:04 COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:39:08 >>ORLANDO GUDES: FILE NUMBER REZ-22-10.
17:39:11 ORDINANCE READING FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
17:39:16 ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
17:39:19 2801 NORTH TAMPA STREET OF CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND
17:39:22 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED SECTION 1 ZONING
17:39:27 CLASSIFICATION RM-16, TO CN COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:39:29 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
17:39:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
17:39:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I HEARD YOU.
17:39:41 DID YOU WANT TO EXPAND ON THAT A LITTLE BIT?
17:39:46 >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE AN ORDINANCE 22-10, THE
17:39:51 APPLICANT HAS MET PROOF OF BURDEN THAT THE REZONING IS
17:39:54 CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE.
17:39:57 THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF REPORT IN
17:39:59 8.14.2.
17:40:04 THE REZONING MEETS THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND THE SITE
17:40:08 HAS ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY.
17:40:09 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
17:40:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
17:40:13 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
17:40:14 ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
17:40:16 ROLL CALL VOTE.
17:40:17 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
17:40:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
17:40:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
17:40:21 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:40:22 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
17:40:23 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
17:40:26 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
17:40:28 ABSENT.
17:40:31 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE ON JULY 14, 2022 AT
17:40:34 9:30 A.M.
17:40:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
17:40:37 >> THANK YOU.
17:40:42 >>JOSEPH CITRO: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ-22-36.
17:40:44 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL.
17:40:46 LACHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
17:40:50 IN PROPERTY 3501 WEST CHEROKEE AVENUE.
17:40:52 THE APPLICANT IS JOHN LUM.
17:40:55 THE AGENT -- THEY ARE BEING REPRESENTED WITH JOHN LUM
17:41:00 AND STEVE MICHELINI.
17:41:04 FROM RS-60 TO RS-50.
17:41:07 TURN IT OVER SAM FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN
17:41:16 I WILL RETURN WITH MY REPORT.
17:41:18 >> SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
17:41:21 LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND
17:41:23 INTERBAY SOUTH OF GANDY NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:41:27 THE TRANSIT STOP IS ONE FOURTH MILE FROM THE SUBJECT
17:41:29 SITE ON NORTH DALE MABRY.
17:41:33 FOSTER PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY THREE
17:41:35 FOURTH MILE FROM THE SUBJECT SITE.
17:41:38 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN LEVEL B EVACUATION
17:41:39 ZONE.
17:41:45 HERE IS AN AIR JILL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE HIGHLIGHTED
17:41:48 IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
17:41:50 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
17:41:53 NORTH OF THE SITE IS A MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT COMPLEX
17:41:55 JUST NORTH OF IT.
17:41:58 AND THEN FARTHER TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH
17:42:02 IS KIND OF OUT OF VIEW, YOU ARE ABOUT TWO BLOCKS AWAY
17:42:06 FROM SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
17:42:08 HERE IS A MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
17:42:11 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS A FUTURE LAND USE OF
17:42:12 RESIDENTIAL-10.
17:42:15 THE SURROUNDING AREAS IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL-10.
17:42:18 JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE WHERE THE MULTIFAMILY
17:42:20 APARTMENT COMPLEXES ARE LOCATED IS THE RESIDENTIAL-35
17:42:24 FUTURE LAND USE THAT IS SHOWN IN THE BROWN COLOR.
17:42:27 AND THEN OVER TO THE WEST IN THIS CORNER HERE, YOU SEE
17:42:31 A LITTLE BIT OF PURPLE WHICH IS WHERE THE CMU-35 AND
17:42:39 UMU-60 WHICH IS ALONG SOUTH DALE MABRY AND ALONG DALE
17:42:39 MABRY HIGHWAY.
17:42:42 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
17:42:44 FOUND IN ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:42:47 THE SEGMENT OF WEST CHEROKEE HAS AN EXISTING DENSITY OF
17:42:50 5.92 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
17:42:53 DUE TO THE DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,
17:42:56 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DETERMINED THAT THE RS-50
17:42:59 ZONING DISTRICT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
17:43:01 PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ALONG WEST CHEROKEE
17:43:05 AND ALLOW BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND WITH THE
17:43:07 DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE R-10.
17:43:10 THE REQUEST SUPPORTS POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
17:43:12 OF HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
17:43:18 ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT UNDERUTILIZED PLAN FOR
17:43:22 TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
17:43:25 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
17:43:25 ANY QUESTIONS.
17:43:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
17:43:34 >>LACHONE DOCK: LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT
17:43:34 COORDINATION.
17:43:37 THIS REQUEST, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU FOR THE REZONING.
17:43:41 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 12,500 SQUARE
17:43:42 FEET.
17:43:44 AN APPROXIMATE AMOUNT.
17:43:46 THE LOT IS 100 TO 125.
17:43:49 THIS LITTLE ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE TWO LOTS
17:43:55 WHICH WILL CONTAIN A WIDTH OF 50.5 FEET WITH THE
17:43:58 FRONTAGE ON CHEROKEE.
17:44:00 LET ME ZOOM BACK OUT.
17:44:05 AND I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY
17:44:06 AS SUBMITTED.
17:44:09 THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS LOCATED ON CHEROKEE AND
17:44:10 HIMES.
17:44:13 AND THIS IS THE WEST -- THE EASTERN END OF THE PROPERTY
17:44:17 WHICH WILL HAVE THE FRONTAGE OF 50.5 FEET AND THIS IS
17:44:19 THE LENGTH AT 125 FEET.
17:44:22 AND THIS IS A SURVEY IDENTIFYING THE WESTERN SIDE.
17:44:26 SO THE STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY NOW CURRENTLY WHICH IS
17:44:28 THE OUTLINE THAT YOU SEE NOW IN THE SURVEY.
17:44:31 BUT THE WESTERN PIECE WOULD HAVE APPROXIMATELY THE SAME
17:44:36 SQUARE FOOTAGE, WHICH IS THE 15.5 FEET OF FRONTAGE AND
17:44:38 125 FEET IN LENGTH.
17:44:44 AND THEN THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP FOR THE AREA.
17:44:47 SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS IDENTIFIED WITH THE
17:44:48 BLACK HATCH MARK.
17:44:49 THIS IS HIMES AVENUE.
17:44:52 THIS IS CHEROKEE.
17:44:55 THIS IS BALLAST POINT BOULEVARD TO THE NORTH.
17:44:58 AND YOU CAN SEE THE LOT WIDTHS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED IN
17:44:59 THIS MAP.
17:45:05 ANY THE YELLOWS HAVE A LOT WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR LARGER.
17:45:08 IF THERE IS A LOT WIDTH OF 50 OR 55 FEET OR LESS, THAT
17:45:11 WILL BE THE BLUE AND THAT IS ONE THAT IS LOCATED IN
17:45:12 THAT PROXIMITY.
17:45:17 OTHERWISE ALL OF THE OTHERS ARE EITHER 60 OR ABOVE.
17:45:18 THE PINK IS 75 AND ABOVE.
17:45:21 AND RED IS 80 AND ABOVE.
17:45:26 AND I HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
17:45:29 THIS IS THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN RED.
17:45:30 IN THE RED DASH.
17:45:32 THIS IS CHEROKEE AVENUE.
17:45:34 THIS IS BALLAST POINT BOULEVARD.
17:45:36 THIS IS HIMES AVENUE THAT IS EAST OF THE SITE.
17:45:41 YOU CAN SEE THE SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH RS-60 ZONING.
17:45:42 THERE IS A PD THAT IS HERE.
17:45:48 RM 24 THAT IS LOCATED FURTHER NORTHEAST OF THE SITE.
17:45:51 WE HAVE OUR ANALYSIS AND ADDITION ON PAGE TWO OF THE
17:45:54 STAFF REPORT WHICH I WILL REVIEW WITH YOU SHORTLY.
17:45:57 SOME OF THE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS.
17:46:00 AND LET ME ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT ON THE PICTURES.
17:46:04 SO THIS IS THE SITE.
17:46:06 THIS IS THE VIEW FROM CHEROKEE.
17:46:09 THAT IS THE FRONT OF THE EXISTING HOME ON-SITE.
17:46:12 THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
17:46:19 THIS IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH AT
17:46:20 THE CORNER OF HIMES.
17:46:23 THIS IS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER.
17:46:29 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST ACROSS THE
17:46:29 STREET.
17:46:33 THAT IS THE VIEW IF YOU WERE LOOKING EAST ON CHEROKEE.
17:46:36 THE PROPERTY WILL BE DOWN ON THE LEFT IN THAT PICTURE.
17:46:38 THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
17:46:43 AND THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW WEST OF THE SITE.
17:46:45 AND WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, COUNCIL, YOU WILL FIND
17:46:49 THE ANALYSIS FROM OUR CONFORMING MAP THAT WAS PROVIDED
17:46:52 BY STAFF AND JUST LIKE TO REVIEW BRIEFLY WITH YOU.
17:46:56 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 17 ZONING LOTS.
17:47:01 OF THOSE 17 LOTS, 17 OF THOSE HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH
17:47:08 A WIDTH OF 60 FEET FOR GREATER AND ZERO PERCENT AT THE
17:47:13 WIDTH OF LOWER THAN 60 FEET FOR 59.99.
17:47:16 WE HONE IN ON THE BLOCK FACE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE CONTAIN
17:47:20 EIGHT ZONING LOTS AND 100% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN
17:47:23 DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 NEAT FOR GREATER.
17:47:27 BASED ON THAT ANALYSIS STAFF FOUND THAT THE REQUEST FOR
17:47:30 REZONING IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
17:47:33 OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA, THE BLOCK, AND THE BLOCK
17:47:34 FACE.
17:47:35 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
17:47:38 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
17:47:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
17:47:49 >>LACHONE DOCK: OKAY, THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
17:47:51 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
17:47:54 STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER REGARDING
17:47:56 -- REGARDING THIS PROPERTY.
17:48:01 FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO -- TO POINT OUT ON THE -- THE
17:48:04 DIAGRAMS PROVIDED BY THE CITY, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE
17:48:08 LOTS ARE ALL ORIENTED STRAIGHTFORWARD THE NORTH AND
17:48:09 SOUTH DIRECTION ON CHEROKEE.
17:48:17 THIS LOT IS 125 FEET ALONG HIMES AND 100 FEET ALONG --
17:48:19 ALONG CHEROKEE.
17:48:26 IF YOU LOOK AT THE DIAGRAM, IF YOU SPLIT THE LOTS GOING
17:48:37 EAST AND WEST, LIKE SO THE HOUSE ALSO FACE HIMES, YOU
17:48:40 WILL HAVE 6250 SQUARE FEET OF AREA.
17:48:42 AND THE HOUSES WOULD HAVE TO FACE HIMES.
17:48:45 BUT WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO DO IS TO REZONE THIS SO
17:48:49 THAT THE HOUSES COULD ORIENT TOWARD CHEROKEE LIKE ALL
17:48:51 THE OTHER HOUSES ON THE STREET.
17:48:56 AND THE LOT SQUARE FOOTAGES WILL REMAIN THE SAME, 6250
17:48:57 SQUARE FEET.
17:49:01 THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THE FRONTAGE IS 50 FEET ON
17:49:07 CHEROKEE VERSUS 62 FEET IF WE ORIENT IT THE OTHER WAY.
17:49:14 62.5 FEET ALONG HIMES; HOWEVER, WHEN DO YOU THAT, IT IS
17:49:17 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE BLOCK ORIENTATION.
17:49:25 IDENTIFY SIZE AND LOTS, DIFFERENT ORIENTATION.
17:49:30 HERE ARE THE ORIENTATION OF ALL THE HOMES ALONG
17:49:32 CHEROKEE.
17:49:33 THIS IS THE LOT WE ARE PROPOSING.
17:49:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO: CAN YOU BRING THAT DOWN A LITTLE BIT,
17:49:38 PLEASE, MR. MICHELINI.
17:49:39 YOU ARE POINTING AT SOMETHING.
17:49:41 YOU NEED TO BRING IT DOWN.
17:49:42 THERE YOU GO.
17:49:43 >> THERE WE GO.
17:49:47 THIS IS A LOT WE ARE PROPOSING TO TURN INTO TWO RS-50
17:49:48 LOTS.
17:49:51 WITH THE SAME ORIENTATION AS ALL THE OTHER HOMES ALONG
17:49:54 THIS STREET AND THROUGHOUT THE AREA THAT I SHOWED YOU
17:50:00 ON THE OTHER DIAGRAM.
17:50:04 ALL OF THE ORIENTATIONS EXCEPT ON THE WEST SIDE OF
17:50:11 HIMES ARE ALL NORTH-SOUTH.
17:50:14 I DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO ITEM NUMBER 3 ON THIS
17:50:14 DOCUMENT.
17:50:15 I HOPE YOU CAN SEE IT.
17:50:18 SAYS THE COUNCIL MUST CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
17:50:23 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY WHEN DECIDING THE OUTCOME OF THE
17:50:25 SUBJECT ADDRESS.
17:50:28 IT IS THE INTENT OF THE CITY THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL
17:50:31 BE MINIMAL DISRUPTIVE TO THIS AREA.
17:50:34 I WOULD SAY THAT IT IS MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE.
17:50:37 IT IS NOT INTRODUCING A NEW ORIENTATION FOR THOSE
17:50:38 HOMES.
17:50:41 TO ACHIEVE THIS, THE CITY SHALL ASSESS THE POSITIVE AND
17:50:44 NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
17:50:46 PROJECT OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND CHARACTER
17:50:49 OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND REQUIRE MITIGATION FOR
17:50:53 NEGATIVE OFFSITE IMPACTS.
17:50:56 I PROPOSE THIS HAS THE MINIMAL IMPACT.
17:51:00 WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMPLAINTS OR ISSUES REGARDING
17:51:03 CONCERN.
17:51:09 WE DID RECEIVE ONE LETTER OF STORE AND I THINK IT IS IN
17:51:12 YOUR PACKAGE FROM STEPHANIE POYNOR.
17:51:14 AND HER ONLY CONCERN THAT WE SUBMIT AND BUILD
17:51:15 SIDEWALKS.
17:51:19 AND SO WE OBVIOUSLY WILL COMMIT TO BUILDING SIDEWALKS.
17:51:22 THAT IS NOT A WAIVABLE ISSUE AT ALL.
17:51:27 AND ALSO I DRAW YOUR ATTENTION -- AND I WOULD LIKE TO
17:51:30 HAVE THIS MADE PART OF THE RECORD THAT THE VARIOUS LAND
17:51:35 USE POLICIES, LAND USE OBJECTIVES -- I AM NOT GOING TO
17:51:37 NAME ALL OF THEM BUT THEY ARE IN YOUR PACKAGE.
17:51:41 THE CITY PLANNING STRATEGY LAND USE OBJECT THAT I WAS
17:51:44 THEY BE RECEIVED AND FILED AND THEY ARE ALL SHOWING
17:51:47 THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY POLICIES AND THE LAND
17:51:50 USE PROVISIONS IN THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
17:51:52 LAND USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
17:52:01 AND THESE ARE OBJECTIVES 2.1, 2.1.2, 8.14, 1412.
17:52:04 LAND USE OVERALL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
17:52:09 SINGLE-FAMILY AREA LAND USE OBJECTIVES, LANDS USE
17:52:13 POLICIES, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL POLICIES, LOW, MEDIUM
17:52:16 DENSITY, MULTIFAMILY AREAS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES.
17:52:20 AND THE STAFF ANALYSIS AT THE END OF THE DAY.
17:52:22 THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS FOUND THIS TO BE CONSISTENT
17:52:24 AND I ALSO BRING YOUR ATTENTION EVERY WEEK WE HEAR
17:52:26 ABOUT THE NEED FOR HOUSING.
17:52:30 AND UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTIES, AND THAT IS ONE OF THE
17:52:32 CONSISTENCY THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN THIS
17:52:32 REPORT.
17:52:36 AND I CERTAINLY RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL FOR
17:52:36 THIS.
17:52:39 AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU
17:52:44 MIGHT HAVE.
17:52:45 ANY QUESTIONS?
17:52:56 ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS?
17:52:57 >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
17:53:00 THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING THIS HEARING.
17:53:03 BEFORE I GET STARTED, I WANT TO POINT THOUGHT SEVERAL
17:53:07 OF THE STATEMENTS MADE BY --
17:53:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOUR NAME PLEASE.
17:53:10 >> TREVOR SCOTT, RESIDENT OF.
17:53:11 NEIGHBOR IN THE AREA.
17:53:14 SEVERAL OF THE STATEMENTS HE MADE ARE FACTUALLY
17:53:14 INCORRECT.
17:53:16 THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL COMPLAINTS.
17:53:18 YOU WILL SEE IT IN YOUR DOCKET.
17:53:21 PUBLIC ON E-MAIL FROM RESIDENTS, NEIGHBORS, MYSELF
17:53:21 INCLUDED.
17:53:22 I AM ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS.
17:53:26 IN FACT MY HOUSE WAS ON YOUR SCREEN A FEW MINUTES AGO.
17:53:29 THIS ZONING IS COMPLETELY INCONSISTENT WITH TAMPA,
17:53:32 WITH THE CHEROKEE NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:53:34 THE NEIGHBORS DON'T WANT IT.
17:53:38 SPEAKING HERE TONIGHT, I SPEAK ON BEHALF OF MANY, MANY
17:53:38 NEIGHBORS.
17:53:41 SEVERAL COULDN'T MAKE IT FOR VARIOUS REASONS, BUT I'M
17:53:44 HERE SPEAKING REPRESENTING MANY HERE TONIGHT.
17:53:45 THIS IS ALL ABOUT MONEY.
17:53:48 IT IS ABOUT SPLITTING A LOT FROM ONE INTO TWO.
17:53:50 TAKING ADVANTAGE OF OUR CITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD AND NOT
17:53:52 WHAT THE CITY OF TAMPA IS ALL ABOUT.
17:53:56 I WANTED TO DRAW TO YOUR ATTENTION TWO CRITICAL REASONS
17:54:01 WHY I WOULD IMPLORE YOU GUYS TO REJECT THIS PROPOSAL.
17:54:02 FIRST READING IS ENVIRONMENTAL.
17:54:07 WHEN YOU SPLIT A LOT, YOU HAVE EXTRA ROOF LINE, DOUBLE
17:54:08 THE ROOF LINE.
17:54:09 DOUBLE THE CONCRETE.
17:54:11 NOWHERE FOR THE WATER TO GO.
17:54:14 WE HAVE ENOUGH CITY FLOODING.
17:54:17 AND DOING THIS IS NOT ONLY GOING TO CONFUSE TRAFFIC BUT
17:54:20 WILL ADD MORE STREET FLOODING WHICH IS BAD FOR THE
17:54:24 BRAND-NEW ROAD THAT IS JUST PUT IN ON CHEROKEE AVENUE.
17:54:25 PROBABLY SIX MONTHS AGO.
17:54:27 BRAND-NEW.
17:54:29 AND THAT INVESTMENT WITH THE CITY IS GOING TO BE
17:54:33 DIMINISHED WITH EXTRA ROAD FLOODING THAT WILL HAPPEN IF
17:54:35 THIS GOES THROUGH.
17:54:38 IN ADDITION, IT WILL MORE THAN LIKELY CREATE FERTILIZER
17:54:39 RUNOFF.
17:54:40 BAD FOR RED TIDE.
17:54:42 NOT WHERE I WANT THE CITY TO GO.
17:54:45 I IMPLORE YOU OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPERCUSSIONS OF
17:54:46 DOING THIS.
17:54:49 NOT ONLY REACHING THE CITY PLAN AND THE FEELING OF THE
17:54:52 NEIGHBORHOOD DOESN'T FIT ALL, ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ARE
17:54:52 HUGE.
17:54:54 THE SECOND BIG ISSUE IS THE COMMUNITY.
17:54:56 THE NEIGHBORS DO NOT WANT THIS.
17:54:58 IF YOU LOOK TO THE NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH, THEY DON'T
17:54:58 WANT.
17:54:59 DOESN'T FIT.
17:55:01 NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH.
17:55:02 THEY DON'T WANT IT.
17:55:03 DOESN'T FIT.
17:55:08 DOESN'T FIT OPTICALLY FROM ELDER UNITS TEAR DOWNS TO
17:55:11 NICE BIG NEW -- IT DOESN'T FIT THE STREET.
17:55:13 IF YOU WALK THE STREET OF CHEROKEE AVENUE AND WALK THE
17:55:17 STREET OF HIMES, YOU WILL SEE VERY CLEARLY MONDAY FOR A
17:55:17 CORPORATION.
17:55:18 THEY ARE IN AND OUT.
17:55:21 THEY ARE NOT HERE AS WE ARE HERE CITIZENS OF TAMPA.
17:55:23 I IMPLORE YOU TO CONSIDER THAT.
17:55:25 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ONE FINAL POINT TO GIVE TO
17:55:29 YOU ALL FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS THIS SETS A VERY BAD
17:55:31 PRECEDENT FOR NEW MONEY.
17:55:34 NEWCOMERS COMING INTO SOUTH TAMPA.
17:55:36 THEY ARE NOT GOING TO WANT TO LIVE IN SOUTH TAMPA IF
17:55:39 THEY THINK THEIR ZONING COULD BE IN QUESTION.
17:55:40 THAT IS A BIG PROBLEM.
17:55:42 IT IS GOING TO SCARE NEW MONEY AWAY.
17:55:43 HOW I DO KNOW THAT?
17:55:44 I AM PART OF THEM.
17:55:47 I MOVED HERE FROM LOS ANGELES INTO SOUTH TAMPA ON
17:55:47 PURPOSE.
17:55:49 IT IS A STABLE NEIGHBORHOOD.
17:55:50 GOOD SCHOOLS.
17:55:50 FEELS GOOD.
17:55:54 THIS IS EXACTLY THE WRONG DIRECTION FOR THE CITY TO BE
17:55:55 GOING.
17:55:56 I KNOW WE ALL SEE IT.
17:55:57 I SEE IT.
17:56:01 BUT I WANT TO ENCOURAGE TO YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THOSE KEY
17:56:02 ELEMENTS.
17:56:04 THINK CLEARLY ABOUT IT AND WHAT THAT MEANS FOR OUR
17:56:05 FUTURE.
17:56:07 I IMPLORE TO YOU REJECT THIS PROPOSAL.
17:56:08 THANK YOU.
17:56:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
17:56:13 ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
17:56:14 THIS?
17:56:17 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE?
17:56:23 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
17:56:33 SORRY, REBUTTAL FROM MR. MICHELINI.
17:56:34 >> YES.
17:56:36 I AM SURE COUNCIL IS AWARE THERE IS NO WAIVER FOR
17:56:38 STORMWATER PROTECTION AND RETENTION.
17:56:42 EACH OF THESE SITES GOING TO EUCLIDIAN ZONING MUST MEET
17:56:45 ALL OF THE CODES AND THAT INCLUDES STORMWATER RUNOFF.
17:56:48 IN TERMS OF STREET FLOODING, YOU HAVE TO RETAIN ALL OF
17:56:52 THAT WATER ON THE SITE BEFORE IT GOES OFFSITE.
17:56:55 AND I DON'T KNOW IF -- I THINK SOME OF HAVE YOU BEEN
17:56:57 HERE BEFORE WHEN WE SHOWED THE ANALYSIS OF ONE LARGER
17:57:03 HOME ACTUALLY CREATES MORE -- MORE POTENTIAL RUNOFF ON
17:57:07 TO THE SITE THAN TWO SMALLER HOMES ON TWO SITES.
17:57:11 THE -- THE ORIENTATION THINK THAT SPOKE ABOUT AND
17:57:15 TURNING THE HOUSES TOWARD -- TOWARD HIMES COULD BE
17:57:19 ACHIEVED THROUGH FILING OF A FORMAL DECISION.
17:57:23 BUT WE THOUGHT THAT KEEPING IT -- IF YOU ORIENT IT THIS
17:57:27 WAY, YOU MEET THE RS-60 REQUIREMENTS.
17:57:28 62 FEET OF FRONTAGE.
17:57:32 62 AND A HALF FEET OF FRONTAGE FOR EACH OF THE LOTS
17:57:34 AND 100 FEET DEEP.
17:57:38 AND THIS CONFIGURATION WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE ASKING --
17:57:44 OKAY, SORRY.
17:57:47 AND THIS CONFIGURATION WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING
17:57:51 IS 50 FEET OF FRONTAGE AND 125 FEET OF DEPTH AND A
17:57:54 NUMBER OF DIFFERENT SUBDIVISIONS IN SOUTH TAMPA THAT
17:57:55 ARE DEEPER THAN WIDE.
17:57:57 DEEPER THAN 100 FEET.
17:58:05 SO WHEN YOU GO TO THIS CONFIGURATION AS I SAID, WE
17:58:08 COULD -- WE COULD APPLY FOR A FORMAL DECISION REGARDING
17:58:11 THAT ORIENTATION, BUT IT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE REST
17:58:14 OF YOUR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS IN THE AREA.
17:58:20 WE PREFER NOT TO DO THIS.
17:58:26 THE LOST WILL BE 1 FEET DEEP INSTEAD OF 125 FEET LIKE
17:58:28 THE OTHER ONES ARE.
17:58:31 WE ARE ONLY HALF A BLOCK SOUTH OF MULTIFAMILY.
17:58:33 TWO BLOCK WEST OF DALE MABRY.
17:58:39 WE ARE IN A REDEVELOPMENT AREAS -- AREA.
17:58:41 WHERE YOU ARE SEEING INFILL.
17:58:45 AND THESE WILL BE COMPATIBILITY AND DESIGN, SCALE,
17:58:49 SIZE, MASS OF THE REST OF THE HOMES IN THE AREA.
17:58:52 WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT YOU APPROVE THIS
17:58:54 CONFIGURATION WHICH IS THE RS-50.
17:58:58 WE STILL HAVE TO MEET THE SETBACKS, THE HEIGHT
17:59:01 REQUIREMENTS, ALL OF THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND THOSE
17:59:04 ARE NOT WAIVABLE AND THEY INCLUDE SIDEWALKS AND
17:59:07 STORMWATER RETENTION AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE CODE.
17:59:10 SO I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY MORE QUESTIONS THAT
17:59:12 YOU MIGHT HAVE.
17:59:13 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
17:59:16 >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD
17:59:20 AND POSSIBLY THE RESIDENT THAT -- IF YOU CAN PUT THE
17:59:21 PICTURE BACK ON.
17:59:25 THAT BASICALLY YOU DON'T NEED US TO DIVIDE THIS LOT.
17:59:27 IF YOU DIVIDE IT ON HIMES.
17:59:28 >> THAT'S CORRECT.
17:59:30 >>LYNN HURTAK: SOUR ONLY COME TO US BECAUSE YOU WOULD
17:59:32 LIKE IT TO FACE CHEROKEE.
17:59:35 >> WE WOULD LIKE TO FLIP IT SO THAT IT GOES THIS WAY.
17:59:37 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
17:59:37 OKAY.
17:59:41 >> A FORMAL DECISION STILL HAS TO GO THROUGH ANOTHER
17:59:41 PROCESS.
17:59:44 >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT NOT -- NOT IN FRONT OF COUNCIL.
17:59:44 YES.
17:59:47 SORRY, I SHOULD CLARIFIED THAT.
17:59:49 >> AN ADDITIONAL PROCESS THAT IT GOES THROUGH.
17:59:53 BUT IT IS NOT -- LIKE I SAID, WE ARE -- WE DON'T HAVE
17:59:54 THIS BY RIGHT.
17:59:58 WE STILL HAVE TO FILE FOR THAT.
18:00:01 WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A BETTER ORIENTATION AND BETTER
18:00:05 CONFIGURATION THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:00:07 AND IT CERTAINLY ADDRESSES ALL OF THE TECHNICAL
18:00:09 STANDARDS THAT THE GENTLEMAN SPOKE ABOUT.
18:00:11 AND I AM SORRY IF I MISSED THEIR COMMUNICATION
18:00:14 REGARDING ANY CONCERNS.
18:00:17 BUT WHEN I LOOKED ON -- ON THE RECORD, THE ONLY ONE
18:00:20 THAT SHOWED UP WAS STEPHANIE POYNOR ASKING FOR
18:00:26 SIDEWALK.
18:00:28 I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY MORE QUESTIONS THAT YOU
18:00:29 MAY HAVE.
18:00:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY MORE QUESTIONS?
18:00:32 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:00:33 >> SECOND.
18:00:35 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN
18:00:35 MANISCALCO.
18:00:37 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:00:40 ALL IN FAVOR?
18:00:48 COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
18:00:52 >>LYNN HURTAK: FILE NUMBER REZ-22-36.
18:00:54 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY
18:01:00 OF 3501 WEST CHEROKEE, AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
18:01:03 FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1
18:01:08 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS RS-60 RESIDENTIAL,
18:01:11 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,
18:01:12 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:01:15 MOVE THIS ORDINANCE AS THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS BURDEN
18:01:18 OF PROOF FOR COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT
18:01:21 THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
18:01:22 AND CITY CODE.
18:01:25 I ALSO ADOPT THE FINDING AND REASONING OF THE PLANNING
18:01:26 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT.
18:01:30 THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED
18:01:34 THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE
18:01:36 LAND USE CATEGORY AND WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR
18:01:39 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THIS PORTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS
18:01:42 REQUIRED BY LAND USE POLICIES 9.5.1.
18:01:44 9.5.3.
18:01:46 9.2.1.
18:01:48 9.3.8.
18:01:52 THE APPLICANT IS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE PAL TEE 1.2.1
18:01:57 AND HOUSING PROPERTY 1.3.4, NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND
18:02:03 ADEQUATE LAND FOR ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO MEET
18:02:06 THE NEEDS OF THE PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS
18:02:09 ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR
18:02:11 DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE
18:02:12 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:02:15 THIS SITE LOCATED ON HIMES AVENUE IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY
18:02:18 OF MORE DENSE DEVELOPMENTS.
18:02:19 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
18:02:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND
18:02:24 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:02:25 ANY DISCUSSION?
18:02:26 ROLL CALL.
18:02:27 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:02:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:02:29 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
18:02:30 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:02:32 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:02:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:02:37 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
18:02:38 ABSENT.
18:02:42 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JULY 14, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
18:02:44 >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
18:02:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
18:02:52 ITEM NUMBER 7 REZ-22-59.
18:02:55 >>LACHONE DOCK: COUNCIL, LACHONE DOCK, LAND
18:02:57 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:03:04 THIS IS FOR 1509, 1511 AND 1529 WEST NORTH A STREET.
18:03:05 THE APPLICANT.
18:03:10 AND THEY ARE BEING REPRESENTED BY ALEX SCHALER.
18:03:14 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM RS-50 AND IG TO CN AND
18:03:16 IG, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND INDUSTRIAL GENERAL.
18:03:19 AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO SAM TO GIVE THE PRESENTATION
18:03:21 AND I WILL COME BACK AND GIVE MINE.
18:03:31 THANK YOU.
18:03:33 >> SAM THOMAS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
18:03:37 THIS IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
18:03:40 AND CLOSEST TRANSIT A TWO BLOCKS TO THE SOUTH OF
18:03:42 KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
18:03:45 THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS LOCATED A MILE TO
18:03:47 THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:03:53 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
18:03:55 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:03:58 YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE
18:03:59 COLOR.
18:04:01 THE SURROUND WILLING AREA IS A TRADITIONAL --
18:04:05 TRANSITIONING NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS A MORE URBAN MIXED
18:04:07 USE AREA.
18:04:10 THERE IS A MIXTURE OF MULTIFAMILY ATTACHED TOWN HOMES
18:04:13 AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DOWN HOME.
18:04:16 JUST SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE HERE IS THE WALMART.
18:04:24 TO THE EAST IS THE TGH EXPANSION OVER HERE TO THE WEST
18:04:27 OF THE SITE THE INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE STILL PRESENT.
18:04:31 HERE SAT ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:04:33 THE SUBJECT SITE HAS TWO FUTURE LAND USES.
18:04:34 RESIDENTIAL-20.
18:04:36 AND GENERAL MIXED USE-24.
18:04:42 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY THE MIXED USE 24.
18:04:44 AND MIXED USE 35.
18:04:47 AND IN THE DARKER PURPLE COLOR IS THE URBAN MIXED
18:04:50 USE-60 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:04:55 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:04:59 COMMERCIAL USES TO MEET CRITERIA.
18:05:01 COMMERCIAL ZONING IS 50% MORE OF THE BLOCK FACE AND
18:05:04 THIS SITE MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
18:05:05 COMMERCIAL USES.
18:05:07 THE REQUEST WILL CONTINUE TO RECOGNIZE THE INDUSTRIAL
18:05:11 LANDS FOR SUPPORT AS A KEY ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR THE CITY
18:05:14 AND ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
18:05:17 THE PROPOSED ZONING IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE WITH
18:05:20 THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITHIN THIS PORTION OF
18:05:21 THE NORTH HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
18:05:25 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTS ADJOIN THE PROPERTY TO
18:05:27 THE NORTH AND EAST AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WILL
18:05:31 ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT TO BUFFER THE SITE FROM THE
18:05:33 RESIDENTS TO THE NORTH & EAST OF THE SITE.
18:05:36 THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
18:05:47 ANY QUESTIONS.
18:05:51 >>LACHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL, LACHONE DOCK,
18:05:52 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:05:58 THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS 45,738 SQUARE FEET FOR A TOTAL
18:05:59 OF SLIGHTLY OVER AN ACRE.
18:06:03 AND I WANTED TO SHOW JUST TO BREAK -- A BREAKOUT OF THE
18:06:10 LOTS THAT ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THIS REQUEST ADDRESS
18:06:11 1529.
18:06:16 IT IS INCLUSIVE OF THE LOTS 13-19.
18:06:18 THIS WILL BE NORTH 8TH STREET.
18:06:20 THIS WILL BE ROME AVENUE.
18:06:23 ADDRESS IS 1511 IS THIS LOT 20.
18:06:28 THE ADDRESS OF 1509 IS -- THIS IS LOT 21.
18:06:30 SO THIS IS THE IG PORTION.
18:06:37 LOTS 13-17, WHICH ARE INCLUSIVE OF THE 1529 ADDRESS
18:06:38 THAT WILL REMAIN IG.
18:06:40 THE RS 50 POURING.
18:06:44 18 AND 19 THAT IS WHAT WILL BE REZONED TO THE CN.
18:06:50 THOSE PORTIONS THAT LOT 18 AND EAST.
18:06:54 SO THE REQUEST INCLUDES THE IG ZONING BECAUSE 1529
18:06:59 CONTAINS TWO ZONINGS.
18:07:02 SO THIS IS A ZONING AERIAL OF THE SITE.
18:07:05 THIS IS THE SITE IN THE RED DOTTED LINE.
18:07:09 AND JUST TO ORIENT YOU THIS IS WEST NORTH 8TH STREET.
18:07:11 THIS IS ROME AVENUE.
18:07:17 THIS IS FURTHER NORTH, FIG.
18:07:18 THIS IS NORTH B.
18:07:20 THIS IS OREGON AVENUE TO THE EAST.
18:07:24 THIS IS THE IG ZONING THAT IS ON THE WEST END OF THE
18:07:27 SITE AND THE RS-50 IS TUCKED AWAY HERE.
18:07:31 THE REQUEST WILL BE INCLUSIVE OF REZONING THE RS
18:07:33 MACHINE 50 TO CN.
18:07:36 THE IG, AS I MENTIONED, WILL REMAIN.
18:07:38 THE VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS THAT SURROUND THE SITE.
18:07:42 YOU HAVE IG TO THE SOUTH WHICH IS WHERE THE WALMART IS.
18:07:45 RS-50 TO THE EAST.
18:07:48 A COUPLE OF PDS TO THE NORTH AND TRANSITION IN THAT
18:07:50 AREA.
18:07:53 THAT IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE AREA TO SHOW FURTHER DETAIL
18:07:57 IN THE LOT IN THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS.
18:07:59 AND A FEW PICTURES OF THE SITE.
18:08:10 SO THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS ON ROME.
18:08:13 AND HERE IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
18:08:16 THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE ON NORTH A.
18:08:20 THIS IS THE VIEW IF YOU WERE LOOKING EAST OF NORTH A.
18:08:21 THE WALMART IS HERE.
18:08:23 THE SITE ITSELF IS IN THE EAST OF THE PICTURE.
18:08:30 THIS IS HEADING FURTHER EAST SHOWING THE SITE ON NORTH
18:08:31 A.
18:08:33 THE SITE -- THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL THAT IS EAST.
18:08:39 THIS IS THE ONE RESIDENTIAL THAT IS WITHIN THE BLOCK
18:08:41 AND THAT IS THE END OF THE BLOCK, EAST OF THE SITE.
18:08:44 THIS IS WHEN WE CIRCLE AROUND GOING NORTH OF THE SITE.
18:08:48 THE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON NORTH B.
18:08:49 THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
18:08:55 AND NOW WE ARE HEADED TOWARD ROME THIS IS NORTH OF THE
18:09:00 SITE ALSO AND ANOTHER VIEW NORTH OF THE SITE AND CROSS
18:09:03 THE STREET AND GO NORTHWEST OF THE SITE.
18:09:04 THIS IS THE VACANT LOT.
18:09:05 THIS IS WEST.
18:09:10 AND THIS IS SWINGING BACK TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SIDE
18:09:11 OF WALMART.
18:09:15 THE SITE IS WEST OF THE PICTURE AND ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH
18:09:16 OF THE SITE.
18:09:20 AND THE DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF
18:09:23 REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND WE FIND THE REQUEST
18:09:24 CONSISTENT.
18:09:29 I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COUNCIL.
18:09:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
18:09:32 SEEING NONE.
18:09:55 DO WE HAVE THE REPRESENTATIVE?
18:09:56 >> CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN?
18:09:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:09:59 >> FOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
18:10:03 ALEX SCHALER 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE FOR THE RECORD.
18:10:04 AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
18:10:08 I'M HERE FOR THE APPLICANT BRANDT PETERSON WHO OWNS THE
18:10:10 PROPERTY WITH THE EUCLIDIAN ZONING REQUEST.
18:10:14 I WILL BE VERY BRIEF AND STAFF WENT THROUGH DETAIL.
18:10:17 RE-ORIENT NORTH OF EAST ROME.
18:10:21 ZOOMING OUT TO GET A BROADER PERSPECTIVE AND SAM DID A
18:10:22 GREAT JOB OF THIS.
18:10:28 A LOT OF COMMERCIAL WITH ROME AND FIG AND WEST KENNEDY
18:10:30 AND THE WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET THAT YOU HEARD
18:10:33 MENTIONED EARLIER SOUTH OF DIRECTLY OF THE SUBJECT
18:10:34 SITE.
18:10:37 AS MENTIONED, THIS APPLICANT INCLUDES THREE PARCELS.
18:10:40 I HAVE THEM LABELED ONE, TWO AND THREE.
18:10:43 PARCEL ONE IS SPLIT ZONED.
18:10:48 PARCELS TWO AND THREE ARE RS-50 COMPLETELY.
18:10:50 THE PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU TONIGHT WILL LEAVE THE I G AS
18:10:52 IT STANDS CURRENTLY TODAY.
18:10:54 THE RS-50 WILL BE CN.
18:10:58 PARCELS TWO AND THREE WILL CONVERT FROM RS-50 TO CN AS
18:10:59 WELL.
18:11:01 AN IMPORTANT NOTE THAT WE WANTED TO MAKE WITH THIS
18:11:04 APPLICATION IS THAT AS THE ZONING STANDS TODAY, IG AND
18:11:08 RS-50 ABUTTING EACH OTHER IS INHERENTLY INCOMPATIBLE
18:11:10 WITH INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL.
18:11:12 WE FEEL THAT PUTTING THE CN IN BETWEEN THE IG AND THE
18:11:19 CURRENT RS-50 WILL MAKE A SOFTER TRANSITION TO THE TWO
18:11:20 ZONINGS AS WELL.
18:11:23 STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH ALL DEPARTMENTS AND THE
18:11:25 PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE APPLICATION CONSISTENT.
18:11:28 AND THE APPLICANT IS ON THE LINE VIRTUALLY.
18:11:30 I BELIEVE THAT HE WANTED TO SPEAK AS WELL.
18:11:41 HE HAS NOT YET BEEN SWORN, I DON'T BELIEVE.
18:11:44 >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
18:11:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU GOING TO BE GIVING TESTIMONY.
18:11:49 IF YOU ARE, I NEED FOR YOU TO BE SWORN IN.
18:11:49 >> YES.
18:11:50 I WILL BE HAPPY TO.
18:11:54 >>CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
18:11:57 [SWEARING IN]
18:11:58 >> I DO.
18:11:59 >>CLERK: THANK YOU.
18:12:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
18:12:05 >> YES, SIR, BRANDT PETERSON, RESIDENT OF TAMPA.
18:12:09 I AM SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
18:12:13 I WILL KEEP MY -- MY SPIEL HERE SHORT AS WELL AND
18:12:14 BRIEF.
18:12:18 OUR FAMILY OFFICE HAS BEEN IN THE AREA ON CYPRESS AND
18:12:20 FREMONT FOR AROUND 20 YEARS.
18:12:22 AND I HAVE BEEN INVESTING IN NORTH HYDE PARK FOR THAT
18:12:23 ENTIRETY.
18:12:26 VERY EXCITED WITH THE DIRECTION THAT THIS AREA IS
18:12:27 HEADING.
18:12:31 AND EVEN MORE EXCITED TO BE PART OF THIS FUTURE GROWTH
18:12:32 WITH THIS APPROVAL.
18:12:35 I DO SIT ON THE BOARD OF NORTH HYDE PARK ALLIANCE.
18:12:39 I RECUSE MYSELF FROM THIS HEARING.
18:12:43 BUT I DID SPEAK TO THE NORTH HYDE PARK ALLIANCE BOARD
18:12:47 AND THE CAC WHO DIDN'T HAVE OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING.
18:12:49 AGAIN, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN
18:12:52 THIS AND LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS.
18:12:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
18:13:01 ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE?
18:13:03 IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WANTS TO SPEAK TO THIS?
18:13:06 WE HAVE NO ONE ONLINE.
18:13:08 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:13:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO
18:13:12 TO CLOSE.
18:13:14 >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
18:13:17 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
18:13:23 COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST
18:13:25 READING CONSIDERATION.
18:13:30 REZONING PROPERTY IN 1509, 1511 AND 1529 WEST NORTH A
18:13:33 STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
18:13:38 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT RS-50 AND
18:13:42 IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL TO CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD
18:13:46 AND IG, INDUSTRIAL AGAIN, A, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
18:13:46 DATE.
18:13:48 I BELIEVE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS PROOF THAT THE
18:13:51 REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
18:13:55 PLAN AND CITY CODE ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND REASONING OF
18:13:57 THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF REPORT AND
18:14:00 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
18:14:03 POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS NOTED IN THE
18:14:06 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, SUCH AS THE PROPOSED
18:14:08 ZONING DISTRICT WILL ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
18:14:11 COMPARABLE TO THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING USES AND
18:14:13 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED
18:14:17 UNDER THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:14:21 ALSO PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY 18.14.2, THIS REZONING
18:14:25 MEETS THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND APPROPRIATE FOR
18:14:28 CONSIDERATION SINCE COMMERCIAL ZONING REPRESENTS 50% OR
18:14:31 MORE OF THE BLOCK FACE PORTION OF NORTH 8TH STREET.
18:14:34 AND ALSO IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
18:14:37 THE PROPOSED ZONING CATEGORY IS CONSISTENT AND
18:14:40 COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE
18:14:41 SURROUNDING AREA.
18:14:43 >> A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:14:45 SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
18:14:47 ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
18:14:49 ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:14:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:14:52 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
18:14:53 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:14:54 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:14:55 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:14:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:14:59 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING
18:15:00 ABSENT.
18:15:03 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 14,
18:15:05 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
18:15:07 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
18:15:12 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NUMBER REZ-22-70.
18:15:16 >>LACHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL.
18:15:18 LACHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:15:24 THIS PROPERTY IS 1809 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE, A-D.
18:15:26 THE APPLICANT IS MITS HOLDINGS QOF LLC.
18:15:30 AND THE -- THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST
18:15:30 TAMPA OVERLAY.
18:15:34 THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM-16 TO
18:15:36 RM-18.
18:15:39 AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO DO THEIR REPORT AND
18:15:53 I WILL RETURN AND GIVE MY REPORT.
18:15:55 >>DANNY COLLINS: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
18:15:56 DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
18:15:58 I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
18:16:00 THE NEXT CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
18:16:03 AND MORE SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN
18:16:05 VILLAGE.
18:16:08 BEFORE WE GET STARTED WANT TO MAKE A CORRECTION FOR THE
18:16:08 RECORD.
18:16:13 BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, 9870 SQUARE FEET.
18:16:17 THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR FOUR DWELLINGS.
18:16:21 WE LISTED ON-SITE TABLE OR THE -- ON OUR TABLE IN OUR
18:16:23 REPORT WHICH IS SLIGHTLY BELOW THE ACREAGE THAT WAS
18:16:27 LISTED ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S SITE.
18:16:30 THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED THREE BLOCKS
18:16:33 NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF N.
18:16:36 ARMENIA AVENUE AND WEST BEACH STREET.
18:16:40 THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS A LIEN HAS IN
18:16:42 PARK QUARTER MILE TO THE EAST OF THE SITE.
18:16:47 THE LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE.
18:16:50 HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
18:16:51 SURROUNDING PROPERTY.
18:16:53 YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE
18:16:57 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST CHESTNUT STREET AND NORTH
18:16:58 TAMPANIA AVENUE.
18:17:02 THE SUBJECT SITE IS ONE BLOCK WEST OF ARMENIA AVENUE.
18:17:06 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN
18:17:09 CHARACTER AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES ALONG THIS PORTION OF
18:17:11 -- OF N. ARMENIA AVENUE.
18:17:15 THIS IS AN EXISTING CIGAR FACTORY.
18:17:19 JUST AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF N. ARMENIA AVENUE AND
18:17:21 WEST CHESTNUT STREET.
18:17:24 HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
18:17:28 SUBJECT SITE SHOWN HERE IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
18:17:30 THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20
18:17:34 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:17:38 THAT DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
18:17:41 THAT R-20 IS TO THE NORTHEAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE
18:17:43 SUBJECT SITE.
18:17:45 THIS GRAY SHOWN HERE AT THE LOCATION OF THAT CIGAR
18:17:46 FACTORY.
18:17:50 IT IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.
18:17:54 AND THE RED ALONG NORTH ARMENIA REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY
18:17:56 35 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
18:17:58 THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION
18:18:02 AND FOUND IN ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING AREA.
18:18:05 THE PORTION OF TAMPANIA BETWEEN WEST WALNUT AND WEST
18:18:12 GREEN STREET 12769 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE -- 12.69
18:18:15 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
18:18:19 63% OF THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY THAT IS A PLANNED FOR THE
18:18:21 RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION.
18:18:24 THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR FOUR DWELLING UNITS.
18:18:28 THAT IS BASED ON THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE OF
18:18:29 RESIDENTIAL-20.
18:18:31 THE PROPOSED ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING
18:18:36 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND WILL NOT LIMIT THE
18:18:38 PORTION ON THE LAND.
18:18:40 SUPPORTS POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOUSING
18:18:42 THE STAYS POPULATION.
18:18:49 AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO
18:18:53 MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA FUTURE AND PRESENT POPULATION.
18:18:56 REQUEST WILL MAINTAIN STABILITY AND HOUSING CHOICE
18:19:00 NOTICE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
18:19:01 PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY
18:19:03 OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
18:19:06 THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
18:19:07 ANY QUESTIONS.
18:19:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
18:19:16 >> MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
18:19:20 >>LACHONE DOCK: LACHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
18:19:24 ITEM 8, THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
18:19:26 IS 1809 TAMPANIA AVENUE.
18:19:30 THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 9885 SQUARE
18:19:30 FEET.
18:19:34 AND I KNOW DANNY HAS PROVIDED AN AERIAL FOR YOU, SO I
18:19:36 WILL JUST TAKE A LOOK TO SHOW YOU THE SURROUNDING
18:19:37 ZONING.
18:19:39 THIS IS TAMPANIA AVENUE.
18:19:42 THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE RED
18:19:43 DASHED LINES.
18:19:44 THIS IS UNION STREET.
18:19:46 THAT IS TO THE SOUTH.
18:19:49 AND THIS IS CHESTNUT.
18:19:51 THAT IS BORDERING THE SITE TO THE NORTH.
18:19:55 YOU CAN SEE ACTUALLY THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
18:19:58 RS-50 ZONING A EXISTS TO THE WEST.
18:20:02 AND TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
18:20:05 ZONING WITH SOME PDS ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL ZONING
18:20:10 LOCATED AS YOU HEAD FURTHER EAST.
18:20:15 AND THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
18:20:17 THE NORTH VIEW ON CHESTNUT.
18:20:19 ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
18:20:22 THIS IS NORTHWEST OF THE SITE THAT IS ON THE NORTHWEST
18:20:24 CORNER AT TAMPANIA.
18:20:29 THAT IS WEST OF THE SITE.
18:20:31 THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW WEST.
18:20:38 THIS IS TO THE SOUTH.
18:20:40 ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH ON UNION STREET.
18:20:41 THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE.
18:20:43 THIS IS ON CHESTNUT.
18:20:47 AND THIS IS NORTH OF THE FIRE STATION LOCATED JUST
18:20:49 ACROSS THE STREET.
18:20:51 AND COUNCIL, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE
18:20:55 STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT AND FOUND THE REQUEST
18:20:55 CONSISTENT.
18:20:59 AND I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
18:21:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
18:21:06 DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANTS ONLINE?
18:21:09 AND WE NEED THEM TO BE SWORN IN?
18:21:10 >> YES.
18:21:12 HELLO, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
18:21:14 MY BROTHER IS ON.
18:21:18 >>CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN.
18:21:24 [SWEARING IN]
18:21:25 >> YES, I DO.
18:21:27 >>CLERK: THANK YOU.
18:21:28 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
18:21:34 PETITIONERS.
18:21:39 YOU CAN GO AHEAD.
18:21:39 >> YES.
18:21:46 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU HAVE TO TURN ON YOUR MIC, PLEASE.
18:21:47 >> YES.
18:21:49 I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR TO SAY.
18:21:54 DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN ANSWER?
18:22:00 >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTION FOR THE PETITIONER?
18:22:02 SEEING NONE.
18:22:06 ARE BOTH OF YOU FINISHED WITH YOUR PRESENTATION?
18:22:07 >> YES.
18:22:07 >> YES.
18:22:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
18:22:11 ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS?
18:22:14 DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE?
18:22:16 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
18:22:18 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:22:19 SECONDED BY --
18:22:21 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
18:22:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
18:22:24 ALL IN FAVOR?
18:22:25 COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:22:27 >>LUIS VIERA: YES WITH GREAT REGRET THINK THAT READ
18:22:29 THE LAST ORDINANCE FOR TONIGHT.
18:22:33 I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING K
18:22:37 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1809 NORTH TAM PAIN IAN
18:22:40 AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
18:22:43 DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
18:22:51 CLASSIFICATION RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO RM-18,
18:22:54 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
18:22:56 I FIND THAT THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
18:22:58 DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED IN THE
18:23:02 RESIDENTIAL-20 LAND USE CATEGORY AND DOES NOT ALTER THE
18:23:04 CHARACTER AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PATTERN AS REQUIRED BY
18:23:09 LAND USE POLICIES 18.92.
18:23:18 AND QUINT 271.2, 5.1.1, 5.9.1, 9.6.
18:23:23 AND 9.6.4 WHICH ENCOURAGED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
18:23:26 AN UNDERUTILIZED LOT AND THE REQUEST OF THE WEST TAMPA
18:23:30 URBAN VILLAGE AND I STATE THAT WITH GREAT CONVICTION.
18:23:31 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
18:23:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA AND
18:23:35 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:23:37 ROLL CALL VOTE.
18:23:38 >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
18:23:39 >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
18:23:40 >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
18:23:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
18:23:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
18:23:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
18:23:45 >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH -- MOTION CARRIED
18:23:49 UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT.
18:23:54 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JULY 14, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
18:23:58 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
18:24:00 COUNCIL REPORT.
18:24:01 COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:24:04 >>LUIS VIERA: NEXT YEAR WILL MORNING THE 7 09
18:24:08 ANNIVERSARY OF MACDONALD TRAINING CENTER THAT PROVIDES
18:24:13 MANY THINGS FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.
18:24:18 A STREET RENAMING FOR JAY CLIFFORD MACDONALD THAT
18:24:21 RECEIVED THE MEDICAL -- I GUESS FREEDOM.
18:24:23 THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO -- MEDAL OF FREEDOM
18:24:26 FROM LYNN DO JOHNSON.
18:24:29 WE CAN COME BACK WITH A STAFF REPORT ON THAT IN THE
18:24:31 SECOND WEEK OF AUGUST, IF WE MAY.
18:24:38 WHAT WEEK WOULD THAT SOMEBODY IN MOVE FOR THAT.
18:24:43 AND BEFORE I WANT THIS DISCLOSED, MY OLDEST BROTHER IS
18:24:46 A CLIENT OF MACDONALD TRAINING CENTER.
18:24:48 SUSAN, DOES THAT PROPOSE ANY CONFLICT?
18:24:51 I WOULD THINK NOT.
18:24:52 JUAN IS A CLIENT.
18:24:54 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
18:24:56 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:24:58 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:24:58 COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
18:25:01 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOTHING, SIR.
18:25:04 >>LYNN HURTAK: NO.
18:25:06 >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO.
18:25:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: DO YOU HAVE ANY?
18:25:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO: I DO.
18:25:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T HAVE ANY.
18:25:15 >>JOSEPH CITRO: THERE ARE SOME WONDERFUL CITIZENS THAT
18:25:17 WE HAVE ELECTED FOR BOARDS, BUT WE STILL NEED TO PASS
18:25:20 THE RESOLUTIONS OF THESE.
18:25:24 I AM GOING TO READ OFF BOARDS THAT THEY WERE ELECTED TO
18:25:27 AND SEE IF WE CAN DO THIS IN A BUNDLE.
18:25:30 RANDY JACKSON, A MEMBER OF THE TAMPA CODE ENFORCEMENT
18:25:31 BOARD.
18:25:37 MR. PROKOP, MEMBER OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD.
18:25:43 MR. PLUCHHAHN, EXCUSE ME TO THE -- TO THE PRESERVATION
18:25:46 COMMISSION.
18:25:48 ROBERTO ANTONIO TORRES, HE IS NOW A MEMBER OF THE BARRIO
18:25:51 LATINO.
18:25:54 SAMANTHA DECKER TO THE VARIANCE REVIEW BOARD.
18:26:02 AND ALSO MISS CHER LENA POWERS TO THE VARIANCE REVIEW.
18:26:04 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND.
18:26:05 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:26:05 OPPOSED.
18:26:08 MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
18:26:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:26:13 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN -- EXCUSE ME, COUNCILMAN
18:26:13 MANISCALCO.
18:26:15 SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
18:26:17 ALL IN FAVOR.
18:26:19 WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE ARE ADJOURNED.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.