TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JULY 21, 2022
5:01 P.M.


DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.


05:01:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM JOSEPH CITRO AND I AM CHAIR OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS.
ROLL CALL.
05:02:04PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:02:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
05:02:08PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
05:02:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
05:02:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
05:02:12PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:02:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN VIERA WILL BE ABOUT 30 MINUTES LATER.
HE HAD SOME PRIOR -- HE HAD A PRIOR ENGAGEMENT HE HAD TO
ATTEND TO.
OUR CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY IS OUT THIS EVENING.
AND MR. MORRIS MASSEY WILL BE FILLING IN.
MR. MASSEY, IF YOU CAN GIVE US THE --
05:02:41PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENT TONIGHT, YES, SIR.
JULY 21, 2022 EVENING MEETING OF THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL HELD
HERE IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IN THE THIRD FLOOR OF CITY
HALL, 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD IN TAMPA, FLORIDA.
THE PUBLIC IS ABLE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING IN PERSON OR VIEW
IT ON CABLE TELEVISION ON SPECTRUM 640, FRONTIER CHANNEL 15,
OR BY THE INTERNET AT TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
THE PUBLIC IS ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING EITHER
HERE IN PERSON IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OR VIRTUALLY BY WAY
OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR CMT.
HOWEVER, THE USE OF CMT REQUIRES PREREGISTRATION WITH THE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
DIRECTION ARE NOTED IN THE MEETING AND ON THE AGENDA.
THE MATTER IS QUASI-JUDICIAL REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PUBLIC
HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY STILL PARTICIPATE
REMOTELY BY CMT BUT CELL PHONES AND SMARTPHONES ARE NOT
COMPATIBLE BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT ALLOW YOUR CAMERA WHEN
CONNECT.
YOU HAVE ACCESS TO A CMT DEVICE, A CAMERA AND A COMPUTER
EQUIPPED WITH A VIDEO AND MICROPHONE TO BE SEEN AND HEARD BY
CITY COUNCIL AND ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN A QUASI-JUDICIAL
MATTER.
CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO WAIVE RULES TO ALLOW PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION BY CMT?
05:04:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
THANK YOU.
IS THAT ALL, MR. MASSEY.
05:04:14PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
THE ONLY OTHER THING I WILL MENTION, A
WALK-ON MOTION.
05:04:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WAS GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THAT.
MISS WELLS, ARE WE GOING THROUGH THE AGENDA OR ANOTHER PA
OF LEGAL GOING TO?
THANK YOU.
05:04:28PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
GOODS EVENING, ANNIE BARNES, LAND
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
A FEW ITEMS TO CLEAN UP FOR YOU OFF THE AGENDA.
ITEM NUMBER 3, AB 22-132.
THE PETITIONER WAS NOT PROPERLY NOTICED AND CAN YOU REMOVE
IT.
05:04:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION.
05:04:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO REMOVE 21-32, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
THANK YOU.
05:04:55PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
NEXT ITEM, ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ 22-28.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO BE HEARD AT THE
AUGUST 18, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:01 P.M.
05:05:07PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO AUGUST 18,
2022.
05:05:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION AND SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED.
05:05:26PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
THE LAST ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ 22-50,
THE PETITION WAS ALSO NOT PROPERLY NOTICED.
05:05:34PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO REMOVE ITEM NUMBER 9.
05:05:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
ALL RIGHT, IF -- IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL, I WOULD
LIKE TO TAKE ON THIS WALK-ON AGENDA ITEM FIRST, IF WE MAY.
05:05:57PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SO MOVED.
05:05:59PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
05:06:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED?
THANK YOU.
05:06:08PM >>REBECCA JOHNS:
GOOD EVENING, REBECCA JOHNS, CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
LAST THURSDAY, YOU ENTERED A RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC
HEARINGS TO HEAR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE GASWORX
PROJECT.
THAT RESOLUTION INCLUDED A PUBLIC NOTICE THAT HAD NOT HAD
THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE ACREAGE UPDATED FOR THE PROJECT.
SO WE JUST NEED TO ENTER A NEW RESOLUTION THAT JUST UPDATES
THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE FOR THE PROJECT.
I HAVE IT ON BECAUSE OF TIMING AND PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIREMENTS, THE HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 4.
05:06:42PM >> SO MOVED.
05:06:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
RESOLUTION 22-587
05:06:49PM >> THAT'S CORRECT.
05:06:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED?
05:06:58PM >> THANK YOU.
05:06:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU ARE WELCOME.
AT THIS TIME -- I AM SORRY.
05:07:03PM >>CLERK:
GO AHEAD.
05:07:08PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION TO MOVE ITEM 1-9.
05:07:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
AT THIS TIME, ALL THOSE GIVING EVIDENCE PLEASE RISE TO BE
SWORN IN.
ALL THAT WILL BE GIVING EVIDENCE.
05:07:27PM >>CLERK:
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
IF YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE
TRUTH.
05:07:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
IF YOU COULD, MAKE SURE YOUR CELL PHONES ARE ON SILENCE.
05:07:43PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION.
THE FIRST ITEM ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA IS REZ 21-87.
THIS IS AN AREA REZONING.
I WANT TO SHOW YOU ON THE -- THE AREA CONTAINED WITHIN THIS
REQUEST JUST BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE REQUEST.
SO THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE A PROPERTY FROM PD-A, CI,
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE RO-1, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, RS-60,
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL,
RESIDENTIAL FAMILY TO PD-A.
THE AREA UNDER THIS REQUEST HAS THE OUTLINE AND GREEN
SHADING.
TO ORIENT YOU THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD.
THIS IS ROSS TO THE NORTH.
THIS IS HIGHLAND AVENUE.
AND THEN THIS IS TAMPA STREET.
SO THIS REQUEST CURRENTLY HAS THE ZONING OF PD-A CENTRAL TO
THE SITE.
THE REQUEST FOR YOU TONIGHT IS TO BRING IN THIS PARCEL
IDENTIFIED AS 1-B ON THE SITE PLAN.
THIS PARCEL IDENTIFIED AS 17-C.
AND THIS PARCEL, 3.
AND THE REST IS PD-A.
I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AND THEN I WILL GIVE MY REPORT.
THANK YOU.
05:09:15PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, DANNY COLLINS WITH
YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
THE FIRST CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICTS, MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN
VILLAGE AND IT IS SHOWN HERE ON OUR VISION MAP.
SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND
PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE WITHIN THE LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
TRANSIT SERVICE IS PROVIDED ALONG NORTH TAMPA STREET, NORTH
BOULEVARD.
HART ROUTES 1, 6 AND 7 CONNECT THE SUBJECT SITE TO DOWNTOWN
TAMPA, MARION TRANSIT CENTER, HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY
COLLEGE, THE UNIVERSITY AREA, AND ALSO THE NET PARK TRANSFER
CENTER.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
AS LACHONE NOTED, THE SUBJECT SITE IS NORTH OF THE
HILLSBOROUGH RIVER AND WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS IS ARMATURE WORKS HERE ON OUR LOCATIONAL MAP.
THE SURROUNDING AREA CONTAINS A MIXTURE OF USES.
COMMERCIAL USES ARE FOUND -- GENERALLY FOUND TO THE EAST OF
THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH TAMPA STREET AND RESIDENTIAL
USE ARE LOCATED PRIMARILY TO THE WEST AND NORTH OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
PEARL APARTMENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IS TO THE NORTH OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE -- UNDER FUTURE
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE UNDER THE RMU-100 DESIGNATION,
14.75 ACRES UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION AND 1.46
ACRES UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION.
REMAINS IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE ROS DESIGNATION.
THE APPLICANT IS USING 5.1.6 AS NOTED ON THE SITE PLAN OF
THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS URBAN IN CHARACTER WITH RMU-100s
AND CC PARCELS TO THE OUT AND TO THE EAST AND R-10
DESIGNATED PARCELS TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE AND R-10
NEIGHBORHOOD WEST AND NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR THIS REZONING
PETITION TO REENTER THE ADDITIONAL PARCEL PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED THROUGH REZONING 18-119.
CHANGES INCLUDE ADDING ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO THE
GENERAL OFFICE USE AND 30,000-SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL RETAIL.
A CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE HOTEL ROOMS AND INCREASE
IN ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE RECREATIONAL FACILITY
USE.
THE PROPOSED ADDITIONAL USE ALSO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FOR
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS ESTABLISHED IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES.
THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE CONTAIN DESIGN
GUIDELINES WITH URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND BUILDINGS TO THE
SIDEWALKS, ACTIVATED GROUND AND STRUCTURED PARKING.
SUPPORTIVE OF THE DESIGN PATTERN THAT PROMOTES WALKING AND
TRANSIT USE THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY THIS PLAN.
THE PD-A INCLUDES 26 -- 2656 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT THAT
IS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PD-A WILL COMPLEMENT THE EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT ON-SITE AND IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH
THE LONG-RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THIS PORTION OF THE TAMPA
HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
PACED ON THIS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS IT CONSISTENT
WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
05:13:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU, MR. COLLINS.
05:13:11PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU SO MUCH, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, DANNY PROVIDE TO YOU THE INFORMATION OF THE
VICINITY AND LOCATION OF THE SITE.
THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS ASK FOR A PD-A.
AND JUST TO GIVE COUNCIL A BRIEF OVERVIEW, THE PD-A, IF YOU
MAY RECALL, IS A PLAN THAT WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU WHICH
OUTLINES THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT AREA.
AND TYPICALLY IN -- AND IN THIS CASE, IT IS A PHASED
DEVELOPMENT.
THERE IS AN ENTITLEMENT TABLE THAT IS INCLUDED AS PART OF
THE SITE PLAN PACKAGE.
THAT ENTITLEMENTS TABLE DETERMINES THE ENTITLEMENTS ALLOWED
AND SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR EACH USE REQUESTED.
AS THE DEVELOPMENT COMES IN FOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT, THEY
SUBMIT FOR INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW.
THE TIME OF THE REVIEW, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
OVERALL PD-A AS APPROVED BY COUNCIL.
SO ON THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST, THE PROPERTY HAD THE PD-A
ZONING ON THE PROPERTY.
I WILL SHOW YOU THE ZONING MAP AGAIN.
THE PD-A AND THE AREAS ADDED TRACT 1-B, 1-C TOTAL 1.7 ACRES.
THIS REQUEST WILL ADD THE 4.7 ACRE TO WHAT EXISTS FOR A
TOTAL OF 53 ACRES, NOT THOUSAND ACRES, I AM SORRY.
AND WHAT I WANTED TO DO WAS TO PROVIDE WITH YOU A SITE PLAN
JUST TO SHOW YOU THE TRACTS AS THEY ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE
PLAN.
SO THIS IS THE BOUNDARY.
THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD.
THIS IS PALM WHICH RUNS THROUGH THE SITE.
THIS IS TAMPA STREET.
AND SO THIS IS THE WEST PIECE WHICH IS TRACT 1-B AND TRACT
1-C AT HIGHLAND ON THE ROUNDABOUT IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER
AND TRACT 3 ON THE EAST SIDE OF TAMPA.
WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE
PROPERTY.
I JUST WANT TO SHOW YOU JUST WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS.
THE CURRENT APPROVAL THAT WAS GRANT IN 2018 ALLOWS FOR THE
USES OF MULTIFAMILY, GENERAL OFFICE, MARINA, RETAIL, HOTEL,
THEATRE AND COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL FACILITY.
WHAT I PROVIDED WAS THE CURRENT APPROVAL FROM 2018 AND THE
DATA PROPOSED AND THE DIFFERENCE.
IN SOME CASES FOR THE MULTIFAMILY, THERE IS AN INCREASE IN
UNITS, BUT YOU WILL SEE THAT GENERAL OFFICE HAS DECREASED,
ALONG WITH THE RETAIL COMPONENT.
AND THEN IN SOME, THERE ARE NO CHANGE PROPOSED BUT STILL
PERMITTED USES.
NO ADDITIONAL USES ADDED TO THIS REQUEST.
SO THE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DESIGN STANDARDS RUNS WITH THIS
REZONING.
AND THIS WAS UPDATED ALONG WITH THE PD-A.
SO ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SUBMITTED MUST COMPLY WITH THOSE
STANDARDS.
ON PAGE 3 OF THE STAFF REPORT, THERE IS A TABLE WHICH
OUTLINES THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ALSO THE YARDS FOR
EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
AND WHAT I LIKE TO DO IS GO AHEAD AND SHOW YOU THE AERIAL OF
THE SITE.
YOU CAN SEE THERE IS RM-16 NORTH OF THE SITE.
THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD.
THIS IS ROSS.
THIS IS OLA, HIGHLAND, AND THIS IS TAMPA STREET.
THIS IS THE OTHER PARCEL ON HIGHLAND.
THIS IS THE PARCEL EAST OF TAMPA STREET.
YOU CAN SEE ALONG TAMPA STREET PREDOMINANTLY COMMERCIAL
ZONING AND CG AND CI.
RM-24 TO THE NORTH AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, RS-60 TO
THE WEST AND THE RIVER TO THE SOUTH.
SOME OF THE PHOTOS -- IF I -- I WILL JUST ZOOM IN A LITTLE.
THIS IS FROM THE NORTH BOULEVARD BRIDGE LOOKING OVER AT
TRACT 2.
WITH THE PEARL IN THE BACKGROUND.
THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
AND WE WILL START WEST AND MAKE OUR WAY OVER TO THE NORTH
AND GO OVER EAST.
THIS IS THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
THIS IS ON -- THIS IS ON ROSS IF YOU ARE LOOKING SOUTH.
AND THEN THIS IS TRACT 1-B.
ANOTHER VIEW OF THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
AND THIS IS ALSO THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
THIS IS LOCATED WEST OF THE SITE.
THIS IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ON RIDGEWOOD.
THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
I HAVE A COUPLE OF PICTURES NORTH.
AS WE WORK OUR WAY EAST.
RESIDENTIAL HOMES LOCATED THERE.
THIS IS MORE CENTRAL TO THE SITE.
THIS IS TRACT 2.
LOOKING SOUTH.
THE VIEW OF ARMATURE WORKS.
PART OF TRACT 2.
AND ANOTHER END AS WE ARE HEADED EAST ON THE SITE.
THIS IS THE SITE IDENTIFIED AS TRACT 1-C.
ONE OF THE ADDITIONAL SITES ADDED THAT IS AT HIGHLAND AND
PALM.
THIS IS TRACT 3, WHICH IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF TAMPA STREET.
THAT IS IF YOU ARE LOOKING EAST.
AND IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE.
AND ANOTHER VIEW IF YOU WERE LOOKING WEST AT THE BRIDGE.
THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
PETITION.
WE FIND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT.
THERE IS A FINDING FROM NATURAL RESOURCES WHICH IS CONTAINED
WITHIN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
WE HAVE ALSO HERE JUST TO SPEAK ON THE BLC AND THEIR
FINDING, DENNIS FERNANDEZ IS HERE.
HE IS HISTORIC PRESERVATION MANAGER AND TURN IT OVER TO
DENNIS IN JUST A SECOND TO REVIEW THE FINDINGS AND THEN TURN
IT OVER TO ERIN MAHER.
SHE IS OUR FOUR STAR EXAMINER AND WILL REVIEW THE TREE THAT
ARE MOSTLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PARCEL ON TRACT
1-B AND DISCUSS THAT WITH YOU.
IF COUNCIL GRANTS THE REQUEST AND IMPROVES THE RESOLUTION,
THERE IS REVISION BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND I
HAVE A REVISION STREET ALSO INCLUDED.
AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DENNIS.
05:19:48PM >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MESHES, DENNIS
FERNANDEZ, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
MANAGER.
AS LaCHONE MENTIONED, THE PORTION OF THE PD-A, EASTERN MOST
-- THE EASTERN MOST PART OF THE SITE PLAN IS LOCATED IN THE
TAMPA HEIGHTS, THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
YOU SEE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE BOX LOCATED AT
THE EDGE OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
THE SITE REFERRED TO AS TRACT 3 ON THE SITE PLAN WITH AN
AERIAL VIEW.
ADJACENT TO TWO HISTORIC STRUCTURES, TAMPA FREE LIBRARY AND
THE GIANT OIL BUILDING.
THIS IS, OF COURSE, THE TAMPA FREE LIBRARY ON 7th AVENUE AND
THE GIANT OIL BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED ON FRANKLIN STREET.
AT ITS MEETING OF JULY 11, 2022, THE ARC VOTED TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AND PD-A AS PRESENTED AT THE
PUBLIC HEARING.
THERE WERE SOME CONDITIONS ON THAT.
FIRST CONDITION WAS THAT WAIVER NUMBER 73 BE STRICKEN FROM
THE SITE PLAN.
THAT WAIVER DID DELEGATE -- REQUEST TO DELEGATE THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMPONENT PROCESS TO THE STAFF INSTEAD
OF THE ARC COMMISSION ITSELF WHICH IS CONTRADICTORY OF THE
LANGUAGE OF THE CODE.
THE CODE REQUIRES NEW CONSTRUCTION OF THE SLOPE IS WHERE HE
VIEWED BEFORE THE ARC AT A PUBLIC HEARING.
THE SECOND WAIVER IS A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX.
I HAVE A VISUAL TO ASSIST WITH THAT.
THE ARC DID MOTION THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE NEW
STRUCTURE NOT EXCEED 45 FEET FROM THE ADJACENT CORNERS OF
THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES.
SO THAT WOULD BE -- THEY WERE SEEK TO HAVE SOME SEPARATION
BETWEEN THE BACK OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND THE -- OR THE SIDE
OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND THE BACK OF THE OIL BUILDING.
AND THEY REQUESTED THAT THIS SECTION IDENTIFIED IN BLUE, ON
THIS EXHIBIT, IS AT 45 FEET.
AND THEY THEN DID SPECIFY THAT THE REST OF THE STRUCTURE NOT
EXCEED 86 FEET.
THAT WILL BE THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE NOT TO EXCEED 86
FEET.
THAT MOTION WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD BY A VOTE OF 5-1.
I BELIEVE THE AGENT IS GOING TO BE DISCUSSING THOSE
CONDITIONS AND HOW THEY TEND TO EITHER COMPLY WITH THEM OR
PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER
ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
05:22:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY YES, SIR?
05:22:49PM >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ:
THANK YOU.
05:23:00PM >> HI, COUNSEL, GOOD EVENING.
I AM ERIN MAHER WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
I AM AN EXAMINER WITH NATURAL RESOURCES AND I HAVE REVIEWED
THE SITE PLAN FOR NATURAL RESOURCES REASONINGS.
I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU AN OVERVIEW OF THE SITE, LET'S SEE
USING DARK MOSS'S ARBORIST SURVEY.
THE APPLICANT -- NATURAL RESOURCES WAS INCONSISTENT BASED ON
THE NUMBER OF GRAND TREES THAT WERE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
WHICH WAS SIX NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
YOU SEE THOSE.
YOU SEE THE PROPOSED REMOVALS IN THE RED Xs ON THE SITE
PLAN.
TO ORIENT YOU.
THIS IS TRACT 1-B, THIS IS WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD.
SO WE ARE LOOKING AT JUST THIS TRACT BUT WITH THESE TREES.
YOU WILL SEE WITH THE GREEN LITTLE CLOUD LOOKING ICONS,
THOSE ARE THE TREE THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE RETAINED.
UP HERE TO THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER YOU HAVE THE GROVE OF
TREES.
THAT IS, LIKE A BUNCH OF GRAND TREES IN ONE LITTLE CLUMP
THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING.
IN ADDITION, NATURAL RESOURCES BELIEVES THAT THREE
ADDITIONAL GRAND TREES COULD BE SAVED BASED ON THEIR
CONDITION AND BASED ON THEIR LOCATION ON THE SITE AND THE
FACT THIS IS A VACANT -- A VACANT SITE.
SO YOU CAN SEE THOSE IN THE PURPLE CIRCLES.
THE THREE TREES.
TREE NUMBER 5, 9 AND NUMBER 14.
I WILL JUST GO THROUGH EACH ONE OF THESE TREES.
I WILL SHOW YOU A PICTURE, EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THEM,
AND SHOW YOU ON THE MAP WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED.
SO THIS IS TREE NUMBER 35.
THIS IS A 32-INCH DIAMETER BREAST-HEIGHT LIVE OAK.
THE TREE RATE SOMETHING A B-6.
LET ME TELL YOU WHAT A RATING IS, USES THE MATHEAN CLARK
EVALUATION.
RANGE FROM A THROUGH F.
A BEING NO APPARENT PROBLEMS AND F BEING THE TREE IS DEAD.
FROM A 3 TO 12.
12 BEING MUCH WORSE IN TERMS OF FAILURE, SIZE OF DEFECTIVE
PART AND THE TARGET RATING.
THIS IS TREE NUMBER 5, A LIVE OAK.
VERY LIBERATING.
19 MEANS WORTH 19 TWO-AND-A-HALF-INCH CALIPER TREES BASED ON
CROWN SPREAD, SPECIES RATING AND CONDITION RATING.
THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHBOUND THROUGH CRUZ, AND YOU SEE THE
TREE HERE ON THE RIGHT.
AND THEN AGAIN, THIS IS TREE 5.
THAT IS THE TREE I JUST SHOWED YOU.
WE BELIEVE THIS TREE COULD BE PRESERVED BASED ON ITS
PROXIMATE LOCATION TO THE GROVE OF TREE THAT ARE ALREADY
BEING PRESERVED FOR THIS -- FOR THIS PROJECT.
TREE NUMBER 9 IS RIGHT HERE.
TREE NUMBER 9 IS A 40-INCH DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT LIVE
OAK.
TREE IS RATED B-4 AND WORTH 16 TREES, MITIGATION TREES.
THIS IS LOOKING WEST FROM CRUZACADE.
SO YOU WILL BE STANDING FACING THE TREE.
AGAIN GIVEN THIS TREE'S CONDITION AND ITS LOCATION AND THE
FACT THIS IS A VACANT SITE, WE BELIEVE THIS TREE COULD BE
PRESERVED.
AND THE LAST TREE IS TREE NUMBER 14 WHICH IS RIGHT HERE.
THIS IS A 54-INCH DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT.
LIVE OAK RATED B-4 AND WORTH ALMOST 40 MITIGATION TREES.
THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHBOUND DOWN CRUSECADE AND TO THE WEST OF
IT.
TREE THAT ARE MUCH LARGER PROVIDE MANY MORE BENEFITS TO THE
CITY AS A WHOLE.
AND IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT ADDITIONAL TREES COULD BE
PRESERVED.
THANK YOU.
AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
05:27:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
05:27:20PM >> I DON'T NEED COMPACTS, BUT OF THE THREE TREES YOU ARE
ASKING TO RETAIN.
WHAT IS THE AVERAGE AGE OF THOSE TREES?
05:27:28PM >> WELL, SIZE IS NOT NECESSARILY --
05:27:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM JUST ASKING WHAT IS THE AVERAGE AGE OF
THE TREES.
05:27:33PM >> 75 YEARS TO MAYBE 100 YEARS OLD POTENTIALLY, I WOULD
GUESS.
05:27:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHAT IS THE AVERAGE AGE EXPECTANCY OF THOSE
TREES.
05:27:43PM >> LIVE OAK CAN LIVE UP TO 200 YEARS.
05:27:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IF ALL THREE OF THESE TREES WOULD BE REMOVED
AND MITIGATION PAID BY APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY TREES FOR ALL
THREE?
05:27:54PM >> FOR ALL THREE, I THINK THAT WAS AROUND 55, 60 TREES.
05:27:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
5, 60 TREES.
IN 20 YEARS FROM NOW WHICH IS COMING TO THE END OF THEIR
LIFE EXPECTANCY, WE COULD HAVE 70 VERY STRONG, TALL --
05:28:12PM >> YES, I MEAN -- YEAH, REPLACEMENT TREES.
05:28:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM JUST -- I AM JUST WEIGHING THINGS OUT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:28:21PM >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
05:28:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:28:22PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
ONE OTHER QUESTION, IF I MAY.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED QUESTIONS AND I UNDERSTAND THE
CONVERSATION, I HOPE.
BUT OUTS OF ALL TREE THAT ARE PLANTED, NOT ONLY ON THIS SITE
THAT ARE REPLACED BY AN X NUMBER OF TREES.
BUT WHEN YOU PLANT THEM, WHAT IS THE RATIO OF SURVIVAL.
05:28:41PM >> OF SURVIVAL?
I MEAN TYPICALLY --
05:28:45PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I THINK WE HAVE TO KNOW SOMEWHERE.
05:28:47PM >> STREET TREES USUALLY SURVIVE AROUND -- THEY HAVE A PRETTY
HIGH NONSURVIVABLE.
05:28:55PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
PLANT 20 TREES AND 10 SURVIVE.
05:28:58PM >> PROBABLY 10.
05:29:00PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
50%.
05:29:03PM >> BUT THESE TREE ARE UNDER GUARANTEE AND THEY WILL HAVE TO
BE, YOU KNOW, REPLACED.
05:29:09PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I UNDERSTAND.
05:29:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
BEFORE I -- I AM GOING TO GO -- MISS DOCK, THERE IS PLENTY
OF PEOPLE OUT IN THE VIEWING AUDIENCE THAT HAS HEARD US SAY
OVER AND OVER AGAIN PD, PD, PD.
HANDS IT IS THE FIRST TIME THEY ARE HEARING PD-A.
OF COURSE THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC DISPLAY OF AFFECTION.
THIS IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT
CAN YOU BRIEFLY -- BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE FOR OUR
VIEWING AUDIENCE.
05:29:49PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
OBJECT OBJECT, LaCHONE DOCK, LAND
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT QUESTION.
PD-A IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE VERSUS A PD WHICH
IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS.
WITH A PD YOU HAVE A SITE PLAN.
A SITE PLAN-CONTROLLED DISTRICTS.
THE PD YOU WILL SEE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, THE CURB CUTS,
YOUR PARKING PLACEMENT.
YOU WILL HAVE ELEVATE -- ELEVATIONS PROVIDED.
YOU WILL SEE THE SITE AS IT EXISTS PRIOR TO PERMITTING.
PRIOR TO THAT PHASE.
THE PD-A -- LET ME TAKE A STEP BACK.
THE PD IS A SMALLER SCALE PROJECT.
MAYBE ONE COMPLETE PHASE FOR DEVELOPMENT.
A PD-A IS A LARGER-SCALE PROJECT, 20 ACRES OR MORE IS WHAT
IS REQUIRED IN THE CODE.
TYPICALLY TO HAVE A PD-A, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE.
AND BECAUSE IT IS A LARGER PROJECT, IT IS A PHASED
DEVELOPMENT SO YOU WILL NOT SEE THINGS LIKE BUILDING, CURB
CUTS, THE PARKING SPACES, THE LANDSCAPING.
IT IS A COMMITMENT AS PART OF THE OVERALL PROJECT BOUNDARY
IDENTIFIED THROUGH THAT PD-A TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS
UNLESS THEY ARE WAIVED THROUGH THE PD-A.
SO IT IS A PHASED DEVELOPMENT.
05:31:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU FOR THAT LOVELY EXPLANATION.
05:31:11PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
ABSOLUTELY.
05:31:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PETITIONER.
05:31:14PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
CATHERINE COYLE WITH URBAN PLANNING INNOVATIONS, 5312 NORTH
SWAUNNEE AVENUE.
AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
I DO HAVE JUST THE LAYOUTS -- THIS IS SHEET TWO OF THE
FIVE-PAGE SITE PLAN AND PURELY FOR REFERENCE.
MISS DOCK HAD ONE YELLOW AND I HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW.
JUST TO GIVE YOU A REFERENCE OF THE PIECE THAT ARE BEING
ADDED TO THE EXISTING ZONING.
FOR REFERENCE ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS THE HEIGHTS PD-A.
ONE ADDITION -- ONE ADDITIONAL THING I WILL ADD SPECIFICALLY
TO THIS ONE, THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
THERE IS A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
THERE IS LAYERS OF ADDITIONAL APPROVALS AND DOCUMENTS THAT
CONTROL WHAT HAPPENS ON THIS PROPERTY, NOT JUST THE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE.
THAT GRANTS THE ENTITLEMENTS AND SETS OUTS THE DESIGN
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS.
A WHOLE SET OF OTHER THINGS THAT GO ALONG WITH THIS
PROPERTY
ADDING TRACT 1-B, 1-C AND 3, APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES OF
LAND LIKE MISS DOCK MENTIONED.
I AM SURE YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT.
IT WAS ORIGINALLY ZONED IN 2006.
AND THEN -- UNDER A PREVIOUS DEVELOPER.
NEVER ACTUALLY DEVELOPED.
2013, IT CAME BACK.
2018.
AND NOW THIS ONE.
THIS IS A VIEW LOOKING AT THE SIDE ARMATURE WORKS WITH THE
PUBLIC SPACE.
THIS IS ARTIST RENDERING PERSPECTIVE OF THE BUILDINGS
LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE RIVER.
THIS IS ARMATURE WORKS.
RETAIL CENTER.
THIS IS AN AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD DOWNTOWN.
THE NEW OFFICE BLOCK THAT SHOULD BE BREAKING GROUND LATER
THIS YEAR.
THIS THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION.
POINT OF CLARIFICATION A MINOR MODIFICATION TO 2013 WITH THE
UPDATE IN 2019.
SO FAR 70,000 SQUARE FEET IN ARMATURE WORKS IS AN ADAPTIVE
USE WITH THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL USES THAT YOU HAVE SEEN
THERE.
HEIGHTS UNION BUILDING, 300,000-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE.
100% OCCUPIED AND ALL BRAND-NEW JOBS IN THE AREA WITH PFIZER
SUPPORT CENTER AND AXIGEN WHICH IS BIO MED.
THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, MIXED USE ON THE NORTH ENDS AT
ROSS.
314 LUXURY APARTMENTS.
28,500 SQUARE FEET OF NEIGHBORHOODS RETAIL.
INCLUDING TAMPA GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, SMALL ONE.
GARAGE WITH 1469 CAR THAT'S SERVICE THE WHOLE AREA AND YOU
PROBABLY NOTICED THERE IS A NEW SPROUTS FARMER'S MARKET THAT
OPENED AS WELL TO BRING GROCERIES INTO THE AREA.
AND VARIOUS OTHER USE THAT ARE ADDED.
MISS DOCK DID A WONDERFUL JOB GOING THROUGH THE ENTITLEMENT
CHANGES.
YOU SEE SOME WENT UP AND SOME WENT DOWN.
IT IS RECONFIGURING AS THE PROJECT GROWS AND ECONOMY
CHANGES, WHAT NEW USE ARE NEEDED IN THE MARKET.
THE OFFICE USES IN THIS PARTICULAR ONE IS NEEDED WITH THEM
BEING AT 100%.
THE -- I WOULD LIKE TO GET TO THE ARC PIECE OF IT.
THIS IS THE PROJECT -- THIS IS THE PROPERTY DIRECTORY.
THIS IS OAK AND THIS IS THE PROPERTY WITH GIANT OIL
BUILDING.
THIS IS THE ALLEY AND THE EXTENSION OF THE FREE LIBRARY.
THIS IS JUST ANOTHER VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST.
MR. FERNANDEZ DID GO THROUGH THE CONDITIONS.
WE AGREED OF STRIKING NOTE 73 FROM THE WAIVER.
WE ARE HAPPY TO GO BACK TO THE ARC.
HAPPY MIGHT BE A STRONG WORD, BUT I WILL SAY IT.
AS FAR AS THE CONDITION WITH THE STEP TOWN AND THE
SEPARATION, WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING GOING BACK AND LOOKING AT
THE SITE AND I WANT COUNCIL TO KEEP IN MIND IT IS VERY
SMALL.
PROPOSED FOR A HOTEL.
16,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS SMALL FOR COMMERCIAL STANDARDS
AND HAS TO FLOW AND FUNCTION AS A HOTEL IN THAT PARTICULAR
LOCATION.
WE HAVE GONE BACK AND LOOKED AT THE SPACES WITHIN AND THE
FUNCTION OF THE BUILDING, AND WE CAN AGREE TO AS THE ARC
SAID, 86 FEET, MAXIMUM HEIGHT.
WE CAN REDUCE THAT DOWN TO 76 OVERALL.
SO WE WILL BE TAKING TEN FEET OFF.
IN A STEP DOWN, THEY MENTIONED AT A 45-FOOT HEIGHT FOR THIS
AREA HERE.
LOOKING IN THE BACK OF THIS BUILDING, WITH THE AC UNITS AND
THE FIRE ESCAPES.
WHAT WE CAN DO AS OPPOSED TO PUT IT AT 45 FEET.
WE CAN REDUCE IT TO 36 FEET AND THEN KEEP THAT STEP BACK
FROM THE EXTENSION OF THE FREE LIBRARY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
THE LIBRARY 36 FEET IN.
GETTING VERY SPECIFIC AND REDUCING THE AMOUNT THAT THE ARC
SAID.
INCREASE THE ALLEY MINIMUM SETBACK FROM 3 TO 13.
THREE IS ON THE TABLE AND 13 FIGHTS WHERE THE SMALLER
EXTENSION STARTS.
AND STICK AT 36 FEET -- NOT TOO 36, BUT SEPARATION FROM BACK
OF THE FREE LIBRARY AND 86, WE WOULD GO TO 76.
WE RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT THAT CONDITION BE REPLACED WITH
WHAT THE ARC RECOMMENDED.
THE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT STAFF NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN
CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
WE ARE IN AGREEMENT TO.
SPECIFICALLY WITH THE -- WITH THE GRAND TREES IN QUESTION.
AND MR. PETERIKA WITH DARK MOSS IS PRESENT IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OF THE CONDITION OF THOSE PARTICULAR TREES.
HE ACTUALLY DID THE RATING ON THEM.
BUT TO GIVE COUNCIL PERSPECTIVE.
AS MISS MAHER MENTIONED, THIS IS ROSS.
THESE ARE THE THREE TREES IN QUESTION, 5, 9 AND 14.
YOU CAN SEE THAT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, TREES 5 AND 14 ARE
ACTUALLY HUGGING IT.
9 IS SET IN JUST A LITTLE BIT.
WE WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU -- EVEN THOUGH THE CONDITION
RATING IS IN THE GOOD RANGE WITH, WHAT, A B, THIS IS 14 IN
PARTICULAR.
YOU CAN SEE THE GRID CHANGE HERE.
BECAUSE IT STARTS TO SLOPE UP TO THE ACTUAL BRIDGE.
ACROSS THIS AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALKS COMING IN.
AND KEEP IN MIND THIS BIG PORTION OF THIS IS ACTUALLY FLOOD
ZONES.
WE RAISE THE ELEVATIONS.
AND THIS IS GOING TO CHANGE APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEET, JUST TO
BE ABLE TO DO THE BUILDINGS.
SO WHEN YOU BRING THAT FOUR FEET IN, IT -- THERE IS GOING TO
BE AN ISSUE WITH THIS PARTICULAR TREE.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SHOW YOU HOW THEY ARE SITTING.
THEY ARE NOT JUST GROWING IN A FIELD, THEY ARE ACTUALLY
PAYMENT NEXT TO THEM.
SO THIS IS THE ROUNDABOUT.
AND THE TREE ARE HERE, HERE AND HERE.
YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE RIGHT ALONG THIS PAVEMENT.
THESE TWO -- AND THIS ONE IS SET IN A LITTLE BIT.
THESE ARE ONE-FOOT CONTOURS COMING DOWN.
APPROXIMATELY ON AVERAGE FOUR-FOOT CHANGE FOR THESE THREE
TREES THAT ARE GOING TO BE IMPACTED.
WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE WAIVER BE GRANTED
GIVEN THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AND THE GRADE CHANGE THAT
IS GOING TO HAVE TO HAPPEN.
WE BELIEVE WE MEET REASONABLE CRITERIA AND IT IS IN YOUR
ABILITY TO GRANT THAT WAIVER.
FINALLY YOU DID -- YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED LETTERS OF
SUPPORT FROM THE TWO REGISTERED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS.
REGARDING THE CONCERNS THAT WERE NOTED IN THE RIDGEWOOD
ESTATES -- OR RIDGEWOOD HEIGHTS -- SORRY, TAMPA HEIGHTS
FIRST AND FOREMOST, IT WAS PRETTY -- I WOULD SAY PRETTY
ENTHUSIASTIC SUPPORT.
WE DID NOTE THE ISSUE WITH THE CROSSWALK AND CONCERN OF
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY GOING BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN THE GARAGE
AND THE HOTEL ON TAMPA STREET.
WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE -- AND STAFF ACTUALLY PROVIDE THIS TO
US AS WELL -- WE HAVE ALREADY STARTED THE BORINGS FOR THE
POSTS, FOR THE CROSSWALK.
THE SIGNALIZED CROSSWALK SHOULD BE ACTUALLY READY TO GO
WITHIN SIX MONTHS.
THE HOTEL WON'T BE BUILT FOR ANOTHER YEAR OR YEAR AND A
HALF.
IT WILL BE IN PLACE BEFORE WE ACTUALLY MOVE FORWARD.
AS FAR AS RIDGEWOOD ESTATES.
ONE OF THE BIG ONES IS COMMERCIAL ACCESS AND VEHICLE ACCESS
TO THE LOCAL STREETS, ROSS BEING THE ONE TO THE NORTH IN
THAT PARTICULAR AREA AND ALSO MAKING SURE THAT THEY WANTED
THE RIVERWALK TO CONTINUE.
THERE ACTUALLY IS ALREADY IN ONE OF THE INCREMENTAL
APPROVALS, THE 12-FOOT MULTIUSE PATH AS IT CONNECTS, AND
GOES ALL THE WAY THROUGH THAT IS PROPOSED.
WE ARE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE FOR THE ADDITIONAL
20-FOOT EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND TRANSPORTATION OFF THE
BERM, AND THE AREA.
I BELIEVE ALSO THE DESIGN STANDARDS ON THE PLAN LIMIT LOCAL
ACCESS TO STREETS ALREADY JUST LIKE ON THE ROSS SIDE OF
PEARL.
HOW THE BUILDINGS STEP DOWN AND NO COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO IT.
THAT LIMITATION ALSO LANDS ON THIS PROPERTY ON THE SIDE --
ON THE WEST SIDE OF BOULEVARD.
SO THOSE STANDARDS ACTUALLY MEET WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
WANTED.
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE REQUEST TO CONSIDER OUR
STIPULATION FOR THE ARC, STEP DOWN AND SET BACK.
AND GRANTING THE WAIVER FOR ALL OF THE TREES DUE TO THE SITE
CONDITIONS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
THEY ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE REMAINING CHANGES THAT STAFF
WOULD LIKE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND WE
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
05:43:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:43:03PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IF THIS IS APPROVED TONIGHT IN FIRSTING,
IF IT IS APPROVED DO YOU HAVE TO COME BACK WITH THE HOTEL
FOR US.
05:43:11PM >> GOES TO THE ARC FOR APPROVAL.
THEY CONTROL THE DESIGN BASED ON THE TAMPA HEIGHTS HISTORIC
DESIGN STANDARDS.
05:43:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I SAW THIS LETTER YOU PUT ON THE
OVERHEAD FROM TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION ABOUT THE
DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TO THE REST OF -- IF THE DESIGN OF THE
HOTEL -- PROPOSED HOTEL WILL COMPLEMENT THE ADJACENT
BUILDINGS THAT AS YOU SEE ARE ALL BRICK AND ONE IS A
100-PLUS YEARS OLD AND THE OTHER I DON'T KNOW.
WILL STILL HAVE TO GO TO THE ARC FOR DESIGN?
05:43:45PM >> CORRECT.
05:43:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:43:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:43:49PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FINE PRESENTATION.
TREES 5, 9 AND 14.
I WANT TOP GET MY BEARINGS STRAIGHT.
WAS THERE AT ONE TIME CITY FACILITIES THAT THE CITY WAS
EITHER LEASING OR WORKING OUT OF --
05:44:03PM >> I BELIEVE THE OLD SAP BUILDING IS THERE.
05:44:08PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WHICH ONE -- YEAH, I THINK THAT WAS IT.
05:44:11PM >> A LONG TIME AGO.
05:44:12PM >> HOW CLOSE WERE THE TREE TO THOSE BUILDINGS.
THE BUILDINGS ARE NOT THERE ANYMORE?
05:44:18PM >> CORRECT, IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA.
05:44:20PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THE TREES SURVIVED THAT.
ALSO AT ONE TIME, IF YOU RECALL, BECAUSE I AM ONE OF THOSE
WEIRD GUYS I NEVER GO HOME THE SAME WAY I GO A DIFFERENT WAY
TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON OR TRY TO ANYWAY,
AND I SAW SOME -- LIKE THE -- WASN'T GARBAGE OF ANY KINDS,
BUT I SAW CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL.
BIG PIPES AT ONE TIME.
10, 12 FEET HIGH OF SOME TYPE OF MATERIAL USED TO FIX THE
ROAD AND WHATEVER.
I BELIEVE THIS IS THE PROPERTY WHERE IT WAS AT, I AM NOT
SURE.
05:44:51PM >> YOU ARE CORRECTED, ACTUALLY.
IT IS ON THE AERIAL.
THE AERIAL -- ON THE SATELLITE.
THEY HAPPENED TO CATCH --
05:44:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I DON'T KNOW I AM JUST --
05:45:00PM >> THIS IS ROSS.
THIS IS BOULEVARD.
THIS IS WHERE THAT ACTIVITY WAS.
THEY WERE T THEY WERE DOING MAJOR STORMWATER PROJECT.
05:45:08PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT MY EYES
STILL REMEMBER WHAT MY BRAIN.
05:45:17PM >> YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT -- AS USUAL.
05:45:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ANY PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THIS AGENDA ITEM?
SEEING NONE.
MISS STROHMEYER, ARE YOU THERE WITH US?
SHE IS NOT ON.
OKAY.
MISS -- PARDON?
NO, THAT'S IT.
WELL, MISS COYLE, DO YOU HAVE ANY REBUTTAL?
05:45:54PM >> THE HEIGHT DIFFERENCE IF I REMEMBER, 86 TO 76, WHAT ARE
YOU LOSING BY DOING THAT.
MAYBE STAFF CAN ANSWER TOO.
IS THIS -- BESIDE THE ARC, IS THIS SOMETHING THE COMMUNITY
DEMANDED?
SEEMS LIKE A WASTE TO ARTIFICIALLY TO MAKE THE BUILDING
SMALL IN THAT SPACE.
05:46:15PM >> THERE WAS NOTHING SPECIFIC IN THE LETTER FROM THE
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS.
THEY JUST WANTED COMBAT BLTS WITH THE HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND
WITH HE HAD TO GO THROUGH THE ARC.
MY CLIENT THOUGHT IT WAS A CONCESSION ESSENTIALLY IN ORDER
TO GET THE STEP BACK MORE PRECISE TO FIT THE BUILDING ON THE
SITE.
HE FELT THAT COMING DOWN THE 76 PROBABLY WOULD BE A GOOD --
A GOOD WILL, ESSENTIALLY.
HE IS NOT OPPOSED TO THE 86.
WE CAN MAKE IT WORK.
05:46:43PM >>BILL CARLSON:
PUSH BACK FROM URBAN PLANNERS IN THE
COMMUNITY WHO WANT US TO NOT ARTIFICIALLY REDUCE DENSITY IF
WE DON'T HAVE TO.
SO ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM STAFF ABOUT THAT BEFORE WE GO TO
REBUTTAL?
05:46:59PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES, LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THAT WAS A REQUEST AS KATHERINE HAS STATED, THAT WAS MADE BY
THE DEVELOPER AND THE APPLICANT ON THEIR OWN.
STAFF DID NOT REQUEST THEM TO LOWER IT.
05:47:16PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ARC REQUESTED IT?
05:47:19PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THEIR RECOMMENDATION INCLUDED AS PART OF THE
STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT OFFERED TO DO ADDITIONAL
REDUCTIONS IN THE HEIGHT.
05:47:26PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF YOU GUYS ARE OKAY WITH IT.
COUNCIL, IF I MAY JUST FOR THE RECORD, THERE IS A REVISED
REVISION SHEET.
THE CHANGES THAT ARE MENTIONED AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT HAS BEEN
MODIFIED ON THE REVISION SHEET.
AND THE WAIVERS ARE LISTED ALSO ON THE REVISION SHEET AS
STATED BY THE APPLICANT.
I WILL PROVIDE THAT FOR THE RECORD.
THANK YOU.
05:47:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO REBUTTAL THEN, I TAKE IT.
05:47:56PM >> NO, SIR.
05:47:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:48:10PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ-21-87,
FORMALLY KNOWN AS PH 22-75320.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE AREA REZONING KNOWN AS
TAMPA HEIGHTS RIVER FRONT DEVELOPMENT, WEST OF FRANKLIN
STREET AND HIGHLAND AVENUE AND EAST OF THE HILLSBOROUGH
RIVER AND NORTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION ONE FROM
ZONING DISTRICT PD-A, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE, RO-1,
RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE,U CG COMMERCIAL
GENERAL AND RS-60, TO PD-A, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
PROVIDE FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES.
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET AND
THE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
05:49:12PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:49:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
INCLUDING WAIVERS ALSO?
05:49:16PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:49:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY DISCUSSION.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:49:28PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
DOES THIS INCLUDE KEEPING THOSE THREE TREES?
05:49:37PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK IT INCLUDES TAKING THEM OUT.
05:49:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I THINK WE SHOULD BE AT LEAST KEEP TREE 5 AND
14.
05:49:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF I MAY, THAT IS WHY I ASKED THE
QUESTIONS ON THE TREES REGARDING -- I WASN'T EXACTLY CLEAR
WHY THEY HAVE TO BE REMOVED.
AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE MY MEMORY AND MY EYESIGHT WAS STILL
CORRECT.
THOSE THINGS ARE ON AND OFF.
WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON THE PROPERTY, YOU MOVE IT
SOMEWHERE ELSE.
YOUR SENSE OF BEING WHERE YOU ARE AT IS NOT EXACTLY 100%.
SO I -- I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE ARE THE -- ARE
THE TREE THAT'S WE ARE LOOKING AT.
IN FACT WHEN YOU TALK OF TREES, ALTHOUGH WE TRY TO SAY WE
HAVE SO MANY TREES GOING AND SO MANY THAT ARE GOING TO
SURVIVE, BUT THE PROBLEM IS -- I AM NOT SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THIS -- ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NOW, BUT ON THIS PART
OF IT BUT WE REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT SURVIVES.
I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE EVERYBODY WHO GOES OUTS TO CHECK AND
RECHECK EVERY THREE, FIVE MONTHS.
MAYBE WE HAVE SOME INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE REALLY INTERESTED IN
DOING SOMETHING FOR THE CITY TO GO OUT AND BE OUR EYES AND
CHECKERS.
I DON'T THINK WE CHECK.
I DON'T BELIEVE WE DO.
MAYBE I AM WRONG.
I HAVE BEEN WRONGER BEFORE.
HOW DO YOU LIKE THAT.
BUT SOMETHING THAT I THINK WE HAVE TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT
WHAT WE SAY IS DONE.
AND NOT THAT THERE IS ANYTHING GOING ON.
I JUST WANT -- YOU KNOW, I HAVE SOME SAYINGS FROM THE
RACETRACK THAT SAYS TRUST, BUT VERIFY.
AND WE HAVE BEEN TRUSTING, BUT WE HAVE BEEN DOING VERY
LITTLE VERIFYING.
THAT IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE FUTURE AND I WILL
BRING THAT UNAT THE ENDS OF THE MEETING.
THANK YOU.
05:51:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
I APPRECIATE THAT.
YEAH.
JUST SAD TO LOSE THE TREES.
BUT -- OKAY.
THANK YOU.
05:51:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:51:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
05:51:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.
05:51:45PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:51:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:51:49PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
05:51:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:51:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:51:54PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA AND HURTAK VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD AUGUST 4, 2022 AT
10:30 A.M.
05:52:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE NUMBER SU 2-22-03.
MISS BARNES.
05:52:20PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER 2, SU-22-03.
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE FOR A
PROPERTY IN A RO-1 ZONING, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONING
DISTRICTS.
PROPERTY AT 3606 WEST SWANN AVENUE.
I WILL TURN OVER THE PRESENTATION TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
AFTER THEIRS, I WILL PRESENT MINE.
05:52:53PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
EMILY PHELAN.
I AM WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA DISTRICT AND MORE
SPECIFICALLY THE GULFVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT SPOT IS LOCATED WITHIN A QUARTER MILE
NORTHEAST OF THE SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH STERLING
AND HENDERSON BOULEVARD.
SWANN AVENUE CIRCLE PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL
FACILITY LOCATED ONE MILE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND
WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
IT IS RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN PURPLE AND ALSO HATCHED.
THIS SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES WITH THE TRANSITION TO RESIDENTIAL USES.
ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH AND ALSO ONE BLOCK TO THE EAST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN PROXIMITY OF HENDERSON BOULEVARD TO
THE EAST WHICH IS A MAJOR CORRIDOR IN HENDERSON BOULEVARD
HERE IS A MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LANDS USE.
THE SUBJECT SITE HAS RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION AND SUBJECT
SITE IS RIGHT HERE.
SURROUNDING AREA CMU-35, AND FURTHER TO THE WEST ALONG SWANN
AVENUE.
R-20 IS ADJACENT TO THE SITE AND R-10 IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF
THE SITE.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICES IN
186,400 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.
THE PROPOSED F.A.R. IS BELOW THE 0.5 UNDER THE DESIGNATION.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND REVIEWED AND FOUND IT TO BE
COMPATIBLE TO THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THE SITE PLAN SHOWS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM WEST SWANN AVENUE
TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE FACILITY WHICH IS CONSISTENT TO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES RELATED TO PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20
FUTURE LANDS USE CATEGORY AND COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH
THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
THIS CON CLOUDS MY PRESENTATION.
05:55:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
05:55:23PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGAIN THE PROPERTY IS SEEKING A SPECIAL USE TWO FOR A
MEDICAL OFFICE.
THIS IS REQUIRED IN THE RO-1, RESIDENTIAL OPTION ZONING
DISTRICT FOR 3606 WEST SWANN AVENUE.
PROPERTY NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE
ZONED RO-1 AND MAJORITY AROUND THE SITE IS ZONED WITH --
DEVELOPED WITH OFFICE USES.
AND SPECIFICALLY MEDICAL OFFICE USES.
SO SHOWN HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS IS SWANN AVENUE IN HENDERSON.
THE APPLICANT IS PLANNING ON USING AN EXISTING BUILDING
SHOWN HERE ON THE SITE PLAN.
SHOWN HERE IS THE SITE.
WITH THE BUILDING DEVELOPED.
IT IS APPROXIMATELY 1847 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.
DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET IS A DENTAL OFFICE.
SOME OTHER OFFICE USES AS WELL.
STAFF DID REVIEW THE SECTION 27-129 STANDARDS AS WELL AS
SECTION 27-132, AND THE SITE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS AND NO
WAIVERS ARE BEING REQUESTED.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
05:56:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU, MISS BARNES.
DO WE HAVE THE PETITIONER?
05:57:52PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
ASHLEY SUITE 1409, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
WE REPRESENT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 3606 WEST SWANN AVENUE AND
TO USE THIS PROPERTY AS A MEDICAL OFFICE.
I WAS GOING TO GO OVER BRIEF BACKGROUND FACTS, BUT MISS
BARNES COVERED ALL THOSE AND STAFF COVERED THEM AS WELL AND
I WILL SAVE YOU ALL THE REPETITION OF THOSE BACKGROUNDS
FACTS.
I WILL NOTE THAT MY CLIENT PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY AT THE
END OF 2021.
PRIOR TO THAT, THE PROPERTY WAS USED AS A LAW OFFICE BY
STEVEN ALLEN PA FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS OR SO.
AND, AGAIN, THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY MANY OFFICE USES
INCLUDING A DENTAL OFFICE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.
OUR CLIENT'S PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE, HE INTENDS TO OPERATE
IT FROM 9 TO 5 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AND ANTICIPATES
EIGHT TO TEN PATIENTS A DAY AT MOST.
HE INTENDS ON USING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND WILL ADD
ADDITIONAL FEATURES SUCH AS A SIDEWALK, ADDITIONAL
WORKING, ADA RAMP, REFUSE CONTAINER AND ALL NOTED ON THE
SITE PLAN.
WE WILL TOUCH ON THAT IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
WE HAVE SUBMITTED COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF SPECIAL
USE 2.
WE HAVE A PACKAGE OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTAIN THE SITE PLAN AND
THE STAFF REPORT.
AND WE WILL ALSO INTRODUCE MR. LANDIS HERE TO TESTIFY ON
BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT REGARDING PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE
USE AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE TO ALL OF THE CRITERIA FOR A
SPECIAL USE 2.
BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO HIM, I WILL STATE FOR THE RECORD
THAT WE SUBMIT THAT THE SPECIAL USE MEETS ALL THE SPECIAL
USE CRITERIA ON 27-129 UNDER THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT THE CRITERIA
THE USE WILL ENSURE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE
AND PROPOSED AND OPERATED ACCORDING TO THE PLAN AS
SUBMITTED.
TWO, THE USE THAT IS LISTED AS A SPECIAL USE IN THE DISTRICT
COMPLIES WITH ALL THE REQUIRED REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
INCLUDING PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 2, 6 AND 9 OF THIS CHAPTER
OR ELSE GREATER OR DIFFERENT REGULATIONS IN THE INDIVIDUAL
STANDARDS FOR THAT SPECIAL USE.
THREE, THAT THE USE IT COMPATIBLE AND CONTIGUOUS WITH THE
PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC NECESSITY.
FOUR, THAT IT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
AND FIVE, WILL NOT INCLUDE A PRECEDENT OR ENCOURAGE MORE
INTENSIVE AND INCOMPATIBLE USES IN THE AREA.
WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO OUR EXPERT LAND USE PLANNER
AND ENGINEER MR. LANDIS WHO WILL PROVIDE TESTIMONY.
06:00:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU ARE ENTERING THIS INTO EVIDENCE TO GO
INTO THE RECORD.
06:00:47PM >>THE DOCUMENT, YES, SIR.
THANK YOU.
06:00:53PM >> THANK YOU.
GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS, CITY STAFF.
FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS BRUCE LANDIS.
I AM AT 3810 NORTHDALE BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33624.
AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
AS YOU HAVE HEARD FROM STAFF AND FROM THE APPLICANT'S
REPRESENTATIVE, THIS IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE WHICH HAS BEEN
OPERATING AS A -- AS PROFESSIONAL BUILDING OFFICE FOR NEARLY
20 YEARS.
THE APPLICANT AND OWNER DESIRES TO CHANGE THE USE TO A
MEDICAL OFFICE, AND AS SUCH, ACCORDING TO THE CODE, THE CITY
CODE, THAT REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE.
THE PROPERTY IS A 10,000-SQUARE-FOOT PROPERTY AND YOU HEARD
1800-SQUARE-FOOT STRUCTURE.
VERY LITTLE IS BEING PLANNED TO BE CHANGED ON THE PROPERTY
ITSELF AS THE SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATES AND AS PARTS OF THE
RECORD, JUST SOME STRIPS OF ADDITIONAL CONCRETE TO HAVE
WIDEN A FEW SPOTS, BUT LARGELY, THE PROPERTY AS IT EXISTS
TODAY WILL BE WHAT IS THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE.
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO VERY QUICKLY IS TO OUTLINE OUR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL USE CRITERIA.
AND I WILL JUST FOR CONVENIENCE REFERENCE THOSE INSTEAD OF
REREADING THEM WHAT MR. MATTHEWS JUST DID.
THE FIRST SPECIAL USE CRITERIA IS TO ENSURE PUBLIC HEALTH,
SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE.
THIS USE IS STIPULATED TO BE A MEDICAL USE.
IT IS IN AN AREA SURROUNDING OF THE NEARBY AND ADJOINING
MEDICAL USES.
SO IT IS CERTAINLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE TREND.
THE EXISTING USE IN THE AREA AND THE TREND IN THAT GENERAL
AREA.
CRITERIA NUMBER TWO, THE USE, IT COMPLIES WITH REQUIRED
REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS.
WE HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY CAREFULLY WITH CITY STAFF IN
REVIEW OF OUR SITE PLAN.
WE HAVE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.
AND THE BUFFERING AND VARIOUS ASPECTS IN OUR CRITERIA FOR
DEVELOPMENT.
ITEM NUMBER 3, CRITERIA NUMBER 3, THE USE IS COMPATIBLE AND
CONTIGUOUS.
I TOUCHED ON THAT WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY.
AS YOUR STAFF OUTLINED WE HAVE MEDICAL OFFICES ON BOTH SIDES
AND SURROUNDING AND COMMERCIAL IN THE BACK IN THE AREA.
NUMBER FOUR, THE USE AND CONFORMITY WITH THE TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE HEN I HAVE IT PLAN.
YOU HEARD TESTIMONY FROM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AS TO ITS
COMPATIBILITY.
IT IS AS RES -- A RESIDENTIAL-20 CATEGORY.
THE PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE, AS I STATED, IS 1800 SQUARE
FEET.
THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY IS 10,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE F.A.R. IS WELL BELOW THE COMP PLAN MAX OF .5, IT IS .19.
AND THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WILL REMAIN THE SAME AND WILL
CONTINUE TO HAVE THE GENERAL CONFORMITY WITH THE REST OF THE
AREA.
AND WE ARE PROVIDING OUR PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK PROVIDING A SIDEWALK IN
THE FRONT OF OUR PROPERTY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SWANN
AVENUE AND PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ENTRANCE OF
THE BUILDING AND AN ACCESSIBLE HANDICAP RAMP.
THE STREET CANOPY PROVIDE FOR SHADE.
WE HAVE APPEAR SURPLUS NUMBER OF TREES ON OUR PROPERTY AND
ALONG THE FRONTAGE AND WE WILL BE PRESERVING THE ENTIRETY OF
THE TREES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FEW WE HAVE TO REMOVE
WITH THE ADDITIONAL WIDENING OF THE PAVEMENT THAT THE STAFF
REQUESTED AND THAT WE HAVE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
THE BUILDING HEIGHTS -- THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATE THEY
NEED TO BE THREE STORY OS ARE LESS.
OUR BUILDING IS ONE STORY AND ONE EXCEPTION OF TWO STORY.
CRITERIA 5, USE WILL NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT AND ENCOURAGE
MORE INTENSIVE INCOMPATIBLE USES IN THE AREA AS I
IDENTIFIED.
IT IS IN KEEPING WITH THE RO-1 ALLOWABLE USES AND ALSO THE
ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND THEN I DO WANT TO WRAP UP WITH -- TOUCH ON SEVEN
CRITERIA THAT ARE WITHIN SECTION 27-129-A.
FIRST IS INGRESS-EGRESS.
WE HAVE MORE THAN ADEQUATE ACCESS TO SWANN AVENUE DIRECTLY.
WE HAVE THE CODE-REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED.
AND WE HAVE EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING OF
SURROUNDING USES EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE COMPATIBLE.
WE ARE STILL COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIRED SCREENING REFUSE
AND SERVICE AREAS.
WE ARE SCREENING THE -- THE GARBAGE CANS IN AT AREA AND LIKE
ALL THE OTHER PROPERTIES ALONG THAT SECTION OF SWANN AVENUE
WILL BE ROLLING THE TRASH OUT TO THE CURB FOR PICK-UP.
SOMEWHAT OF A LEGACY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL -- ORIGINAL
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA.
WE PROPOSE NO ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO THE LIGHTING, UTILITIES.
WE ARE ADDING -- WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY INTENSE -- MORE
INTENSE USES OF THE PROPERTY AND DRAINAGE, NO IMPACTS.
NUMBER SEVEN, CONTROL ADVERSE EFFECTS.
THIS IS A LOW INTENSITY USE, SO IT WILL CERTAINLY PRESERVE
THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND WITH THAT, I AM -- I WILL TURN IT BACK OVER TO MR.
MATTHEWS.
06:06:39PM >> THANK YOU, MR. LANDIS.
WITH THAT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED AND THE TESTIMONY
ELICITED TODAY, WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE
COUNCIL APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE 2 APPLICATION AND WE WILL BE
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
06:06:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE COMMENT TO THIS
AGENDA ITEM?
OF MISS STROHMEYER ON THE LINE?
I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL THIS FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
06:07:16PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR, I MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDERS NANCE APPROVING A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MEDICAL OFFICE OF RO-1, RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE, ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3606 WEST
SWANN AVENUE IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
06:07:38PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
06:07:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
06:07:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:07:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:07:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
06:07:49PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
06:07:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:07:52PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:07:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:07:54PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNAMINOUSLY.
SECOND READING AUGUST 25, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
06:08:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:08:02PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
06:08:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, FILE NUMBER REZ-22-26.
06:08:17PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER 4, REZ-22-26.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY 8101 NORTH 39th STREET AND
8102 NORTH TEMPLE CIRCLE FROM C G COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND CN,
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO PT PLANNING DEVELOPMENT.
I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND AFTER
THEIR PRESENTATION, I WILL DO MINE.
06:08:44PM >> THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
PLANNING DISTRICT AND THE STADIUM NEIGHBORHOOD AREA.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED WITHIN A HALF MILE OF
THE SUBJECT SITE ON WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD
AND NORTH GOMEZ AVENUE.
AL LOPEZ PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED
WITHIN ONE MILE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE.
THE AERIAL --
06:09:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SORRY, WE ARE ON NUMBER 4.
06:09:34PM >> OH.
06:09:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ARE ALL HUMAN.
DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.
06:09:43PM >> SORRY, I GOT THE WRONG REPORT.
06:09:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
06:09:46PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
JUST A PREVIEW.
06:09:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
RESTART.
START OVER.
06:09:51PM >> ALL RIGHT
06:09:51PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I THOUGHT IT WAS A TV SHOW --
06:09:56PM >> SORRY ABOUT THAT.
06:09:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.
06:09:58PM >> EMILY PHALEN, PLANNING COMMISSION.
22-26 REZONING.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING
DISTRICTS AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE TEMPLE CREST
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET
SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE CORNER OF NORTH 40th
STREET AND EAST MILLER AVENUE.
TEMPLE CREST PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY
LOCATED TWO BLOCKS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SITE IS
NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE RIGHT HERE
OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT IS LOCATED ON NORTH GREENWOOD AVENUE.
AND IN BETWEEN NORTH 39th STREET AND NORTH TEMPLE CREST
CIRCLE.
THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY
RESIDENTIAL WITH A TRANSITION TO COMMERCIAL USES ALONG NORTH
40th STREET.
HERE IS THE MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS A COMMUNITY MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL-35 --
COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION HERE IN PINK.
THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO THE NORTH
AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT
SITE.
AND THEN FURTHER TO THE WEST IS TEMPLE CORRECTION PARK.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTH 40th STREET
CORRIDOR.
WITHIN THESE AREAS, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES A
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT ENCOURAGES WALK IN TRANSIT THROUGH
BUILDING DESIGN AND BUILDING AMENITIES.
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF EIGHT UNITS IS UNDER THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
35 DESIGNATION.
DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY USES IN THE SURROUNDING
AREA, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED PD ZONING IS COMPATIBLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
PROPOSED REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO THE HOUSING OF THE
CITY'S POPULATION.
THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON
VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE
SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAIL TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S
PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION AND COME PARABLE AND COMPATIBLE.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:12:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
06:12:44PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION,
AGAIN, REZ-22-26.
PROPERTY AT 8102 NORTH TEMPLE CIRCLE AND 8101 NORTH 39th
STREET.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSE TODAY TO REZONE FROM CG, COMMERCIAL
GENERAL AND CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO PD, FOR
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN HERE AND
HERE.
AS EMILY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALREADY STATED, THERE
IS A LARGE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY IN THE
AREA WITH RS-60, 50, AND RM-24.
THESE PROPERTIES ARE LARGELY DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY --
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, SPECIFICALLY THIS PROJECT.
IS FOR EIGHT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS SHOWN
HERE ON THE SITE PLAN.
PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36 FEET.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A WAIVER TO REDUCE PARK FROM 18
SPACES TO 16 PARKING SPACES HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS SAVING
ALL THE GRAND TREES ON-SITE SO, THEREFORE, DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
JUST CONTINUING ALONG, I WILL SHOW YOU THE ELEVATION THAT'S
WE WERE PROVIDED.
AS WELL AS PICTURES OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
HERE IS ANOTHER PICTURE.
AS WELL AS THE INTERSECTION TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.
AND PROPERTY NORTH OF THE SITE.
JUST GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE -- OF THE OVERALL CHARACTER OF
THE AREA.
AGAIN, STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT AND I AM AVAILABLE
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:14:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
PETITIONER.
ITEM NUMBER 4.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
MILFORD MARTINEZ?
MR. MARTINEZ, ARE YOU THERE?
MR. MARTINEZ, ARE YOU THERE?
CMT AT ITS FINEST.
06:15:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I KNOW NO ONE IS HERE, BUT -- -- WHAT THE
ATTORNEY IS GOING TO TELL US.
06:16:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET'S --
06:16:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I WASN'T SWORN IN.
HE WASN'T HERE.
06:16:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MY SUGGESTION IS WE MOVE FORWARD TO THE NEXT
AGENDA ITEM AND WE CAN COME BACK -- BACK TO THIS ONCE MR.
MARTINEZ IS NOTIFIED THAT HE IS ONLINE.
WE ARE GOING TO GO TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6, FILE
NUMBER REZ-22-37.
06:16:24PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IS THE OTHER LADY HERE.
I KNOW SHE IS THE PETITION, BUT --
06:16:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ARE MOVING ON.
06:16:36PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO PROBLEM.
06:16:37PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER 6 IS REZ-22-37.
THE ASK IS REZONE THE PROPERTY ON NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND
SEVERAL ADDRESSES LISTED IN THE THE STAFF REPORT ON EAST
HENDERSON AVENUE, ESTELLE STREET.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM-16, CG, CY-5
TO PD AND YC-9.
I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
AND AFTER THEIR REPORT, I WILL CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION.
06:17:11PM >> GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
JUST FOR THE RECORD, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SUBMITTED A
REVISED REPORT EARLIER IN THE WEEK.
THAT REPORT SAYS "REVISED" RIGHT BEHIND THE PETITION NUMBER.
OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS
AND SPECIFICALLY THE CENTRAL PARK URBAN VILLAGE.
CLOSEST TRANSIT AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST ESTELLE STREET
AND NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
SERVED BY HART-RAIL 400 CONNECTING TO THE SUBJECT SITE TO
DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND THE UNIVERSITY AREA.
I WANT TO NOTES THAT NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE IS A TRANSIT
EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE PERIPHERY AND THE YBOR
CITY LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE.
IT IS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
SOUTHEAST -- OR SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST
HENDERSON AVENUE AND NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY URBAN
IN CHARACTER.
THERE IS -- THIS IS THE GTE CREDIT UNION HEADQUARTERS
DIRECTLY TO THE WEST, SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THERE ARE PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES ALONG NORTH
NEBRASKA AVENUE.
AS WELL AS SOME MULTIFAMILY TO THE SOUTH -- FURTHER SOUTH OF
THE SUBJECT SITE, SOUTH OF K STREET.
THE SUBJECT SITE, AS I STAID STATED EARLIER IS WITHIN A
URBAN AREA.
RECOGNIZED UNDER URBAN 60 THAT ALLOWS FOR 60 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE OR UP TO A .25 FAR.
BETWEEN EAST HENDERSON AND SCOTT STREET, CONTAINS PARCELS
UNDER THE UMU-60 DESIGNATION.
CMU-35 IS DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
AND WITHIN A QUARTER MILE TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE IS LAND
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RMU-100 SEEN HERE ON THE MAGENTA COLOR
ON OUR MAP.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IT COMPARABLE AND
COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING A AREA.
39 DETACHED UNITS AT 2.29 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS WELL
BELOW THE DENSITY UNDER THE URBAN MIXED USE 6 DESIGNATION
AND OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE REQUEST ADDRESSES MANY OF
THE POLICIES -- MANY OF THE USED CORRIDOR POLICIES.
PUBLIC SIDEWALKS ARE PROVIDE ALONG ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS
AND ETERNAL CONNECTIONS SO PEDESTRIAN CAN ACCESS TRANSIT AND
SAFELY NAVIGATE THROUGHOUT THE SITE.
BUILDINGS ARE ALSO PLACED CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC'S
RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
AND ENTRANCES ARE MUCH ORIENTED TOWARD NEBRASKA AVENUE.
27-28 TO NOT FACE THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THAT IS WAIVER 4 ON THE SITE PLAN.
BECAUSE UNITS 1-3, 11-14 AND 27 ARE NOT ADJACENT TO THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, THEY CAN NOT ORIENT TO A NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK OR STREET.
THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
THAT CONNECT THE ENTRANCES OF THE UNITS TO THE SIDEWALKS
ALONG THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MEETING THE INTENT OF THIS
POLICY.
UNITS 4, 15 AND 28 ARE ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
AND SUGGEST PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM THE ENTRANCE TO THE
ADJACENT SIDEWALKS.
OVERALL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS THE REQUEST MEETING
THE INTENT OF 9.2.6 POLICY.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS THE POLICYYIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WITH HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
ENCOURAGE NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED TO THAT IT
WILL MEET THE NEED OF TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION.
THE REQUEST WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING CHOICES WITH
ACCESS TO TRANSIT AND WITHIN THE CENTRAL PARK URBAN VILLAGE.
IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST WILL PROMOTE A SPELLINGS ARE
PATTERN THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S FORM STRATEGY AND
INCREASE AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING AND PROMOTES WALKING AND
TRANSITS USE NEAR EMPLOYMENT CONCENTRATIONS, RESIDENTIAL
SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SUGGESTED THAT RECORD THE
URBAN MIXED USE AND A SITE DATA TABLE BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READINGS.
BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES OF
POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER
ANY QUESTIONS.
06:22:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. COLLINS?
06:22:22PM >> THANK YOU.
06:22:25PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION,
NULLREZ-22-37, REQUEST TO REZONE FROM RM-16, CG AND YC-5
TO PD AND YC-9, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FIVE WAIVERS.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 1.7 ACRES
WHICH I WILL SHOW YOU ON THE OVERHEAD.
OUTLINED ON THIS EXCEPTION OF EAST HENDERSON.
AND NEBRASKA.
CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT SITE IS USED AS A PARKING LOTS AND
VACANT LAND.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED RM-24.
TO THE WEST IS RM-16.
SO THERE IS A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING TYPES, AS WELL
AS ZONING IN THE AREA.
SHOWN HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE APPLICANT -- HANDS IT IS THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
THE NATIONAL BUILDING HEAT FOR THE TOWN HOMES IS 36 FEET
TALL.
TOTAL OF 65 PARKING SPACE ARE REQUIRED -- REQUIRED AND 92
ARE BEING PROVIDED.
VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROVIDED FROM EAST ESTELLE STREET AND
EAST HENDERSON AVENUE.
AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMPLIANT STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST
CONSISTENT.
AGAIN, I WILL SHOW YOU THE SURROUNDING AREA.
SO THIS IS PROPERTY SOUTH -- SHOWING SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT
SITE.
NORTHEAST, WEST NORTH, AND AGAIN EAST.
ALSO -- THERE WAS A REVISION SHEET THAT WAS HANDED OUT THAT
IS AMENDS WAIVER NUMBER FIVE.
THAT WAS HANDED OUT TO YOU IT.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:24:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS BARNES?
THANK YOU.
PETITIONER.
06:24:55PM >> GOOD EVENING.
MY NAME IS JENNIFER LATTIMORE.
1924 EAST --
06:25:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS LATTIMORE, HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN?
06:25:05PM >> I HAVE NOT, SORRY.
06:25:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYBODY ELSE IN CHAMBER THAT HAVE NOT BEEN
SWORN IN THAT WILL BE GIVING ANY TYPE OF TESTIMONY, PLEASE
STAND TO BE SWORN IN.
06:25:15PM >>CLERK:
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
[SWEARING IN]
06:25:21PM >> YES.
06:25:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PLEASE CONDITION.
06:25:24PM >> JENNIFER LATTIMORE, 1925 EAST -- AVENUE.
I AM ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS ON THE PROJECT.
I WORK FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT.
WE ARE A LOCAL YBOR-BASED COMPANY.
WE HAVE BEEN IN YBOR CITY FOR OVER TEN YEARS NOW.
WE ARE PART OF THE YBOR COMMUNITY AND WE ARE EXCITED OF THE
DYNAMIC EVOLUTION THAT IS HAPPENING IN THE DISTRICT AND WE
ARE VERY EXCITED TO BE A PART OF IT.
ALL OF OUR YBOR PROJECTS ARE UNIQUE AND HAVE ADDED
CHARACTERS TO THE COMMUNITY.
A FEW OF THE PAST PROJECTS INCLUDE EXTENSIVE RENOVATION TO
HISTORIC BUNGALOWS TO THE DISTRICT, WORK FORCE APARTMENTS
AND NEW CONSTRUCTION BUILDING.
AND WE HAVE DEVELOPED A BRAND FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
IT IS CALLED CANVAS.
CANVAS BRAND STANDS FOR FREEDOM OF CREATIVITY AND WE LIKE TO
HIGHLIGHT THE LOCAL ARTISTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE ARE PROUD OF THE LOCAL ARTIST COMMUNITY AND HAVE
DEVELOPED A BRAND TO PAY IT HOMAGE.
WE DEVELOPED THIS BRAND BY COLLABORATING WITH A LOCAL DESIGN
TEAM THAT IS BASED IN YBOR CITY, AS WELL AS LOCAL ARTIST WHO
WILL CREATE ART INSTALLATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THE INDUSTRIAL ARCHITECTURE IS INFLUENCED BY YBOR CITY
WAREHOUSES CONVERTED TO ARTIST STUDIOS AS WELL AS SOME
LIVING SPACES.
A FEW OF OF THE -- OF THE DEVELOPMENTS -- THE BENEFITS OF
THIS DEVELOP IS THAT THIS PROJECT CREATES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
HOME OWNERSHIP IN AN AREA WHERE THERE IS OVER 1,000 -- OR
WILL BE IN THE FUTURE 1,000 FOR-RENT UNITS.
IT IS SURROUNDED ABOUT AFEW MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENTS.
IT IMPROVES VACANT, UNIMPROVED LAND ADD TO THE TAX BASIS.
AND WE HAVE COORDINATED THE SITE PLAN TO CONTAIN FOUR GRAND
TREES THAT ARE WITHIN THE YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PORTION OF -- OF THE -- LOST MY WORDS
THERE.
-- OF THE PRESENTATION AND MARK BENTLEY AND OUR ATTORNEY
WILL TAKE OVER FROM THERE.
06:27:38PM >> THANK YOU, JENNIFER.
GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS.
I WAS GOING TO SAY I DON'T WANT TO BEAT A DEAD HORSE, BUT I
DON'T WANT TO DEFEND MR. MIRANDA HERE.
06:27:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I HAVEN'T DIED YET.
06:27:52PM >> NO, NOT YOU.
[LAUGHTER]
06:27:56PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF YOU WANT A SHOW, I WILL GIVE YOU ONE.
06:27:59PM >> YOU GUYS KNOW WHAT I AM SAYING.
06:28:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
LISTEN, I AM GAME --
06:28:04PM >> IF I HAVEN'T OFFENDED YOU.
06:28:05PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SAID I WAS BARELY ALIVE, THANK YOU.
06:28:08PM >> WHERE WAS I.
ANYHOW --
06:28:11PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YOU ARE IN CHAMBERS.
06:28:12PM >> EXACTLY.
THE REZONING FROM RM-24 TO YC-5 TO PD AND ALSO TO YC-9.
THE REASON YC-9, TWO-THIRDS ARE LOCATED IN THE YBOR HISTORIC
DISTRICT AND SUBJECT TO THE BARRIO LATINO DESIGN STANDARDS.
AND PART OF THIS PROCEDURE WE HAD TO GET A RECOMMENDATION
FROM THE BARRIO COUNCIL AND GET A RECOMMENDATION.
THE SUBJECT REZONING WOULD NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACTS WITH
THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FROM THE BARRIO TO CITY COUNCIL.
PROJECT WILL CONSISTENT OF 39 FEE-SIMPLE TOWN HOMES AS YOU
HEARD AND DENSITY 22 UNITS PER ACRE.
SUBJECT PROPERTY UMU-60.
IN THEORY YOU CAN HAVE UP TO 87 UNITS ON THE PROPERTY.
WE ARE PROPOSING 39.
THIS IS ALSO WHAT WE CONSIDER PHASE TWO OF THE CANVAS
PROJECT.
YOU MIGHT RECALL EARLIER THIS YEAR, I THINK IT WAS THE
LATTER PART OF MARCH, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED WHAT I CALL
PHASE ONE.
IF YOU CAN LOOK AT THE OVERHEAD.
THIS YELLOW AREA IS WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH TONIGHT.
IT IS PHASE TWO.
THIS IS PHASE ONE.
CITY COUNCIL APPROVED PHASE ONE, I THINK, ON MARCH 25 AND IT
WAS FOR 40 TOWN HOMES.
IT'S ALMOST THE SAME PROJECT.
THE -- AS I MENTIONED, ABOUT TWO-THIRDS OF THE PROJECT WAS
IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
AND ALSO THE BARRIO LATINO STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO ITS
BOARD AND TO CITY COUNCIL.
LIKEWISE, YOU HEARD MR. COLLINS RECOMMEND APPROVAL FROM THE
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
WE SUBMITTED NUMEROUS LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM STAKEHOLDERS
IN THE YBOR COMMUNITY AND NOTHING BUT POSITIVE FEEDBACK.
WITH RESPECT TO THE WAIVERS, THESE ARE THE SAME WAIVERS THAT
WERE REQUESTED AND APPROVED ESSENTIALLY FOR PHASE ONE.
IF YOU WANT ME TO GO THROUGH THAT, I WILL.
BUT WE HAVE A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY FROM ALL STAFFS, ALL
AGENCIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITY, WHICH IS KIND OF A RARITY
THESE DAYS.
SO THAT BEING SAID, UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST COUNCIL'S APPROVAL.
06:30:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
ANYONE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS -- SORRY, COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:30:49PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THIS THE PROJECT CONNECTED TO -- ACROSS
FROM TAMPA PARK PLUS?
06:30:54PM >> PRETTY MUCH, YEAH, BY THE LIBRARY, LITTLE SOUTH OF IT,
YEAH.
06:30:58PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I KNOW THAT PORTION OF YBOR.
06:31:01PM >> I THINK IT IS HENDERSON, COUNCILMAN GUDES TO THE NORTH
AND ESTELLE TO THE SOUTH.
06:31:08PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
OKAY.
THANK YOU, SIR.
06:31:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:31:13PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WAS NOT HERE FOR THE PORTION -- THE FIRST
PORTION.
DO YOU HAVE ANY RENDERINGS THAT YOU CAN SHOW.
06:31:22PM >> OF THIS PROJECT?
06:31:23PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:31:24PM >> STAFF HAS THEM.
06:31:38PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I HAVE THIS PROJECT AND THE OTHER SOUTH THAT MR. BENTLEY WAS
REPRESENTING.
06:31:59PM >> HERE IS THE PROJECT WE ARE DEALING WITH TONIGHT.
THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IN THE DISTRICT IS 45 FEET.
36-FOOT TOWN HOMES, THREE STORY.
39 OF THEM.
THIS ELEVATION IS ESSENTIAL THE SAME AS THE ONE.
I CAN DIG IT UP, BUT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, ESSENTIALLY THE
SAME AS PHASE ONE.
AND KIND OF INTERESTING BECAUSE THE BARRIO'S ROLE IS TO
APPROVE THE EXTERIOR DESIGN.
AND KIND OF A CHALLENGE WHEN THEY ARE PRESENTED WITH A
REZONING.
IT IS KIND OF UNIQUE TO THEM.
SO IT IS KIND OF A QUASI REVIEW OF THE EXTERIOR DESIGN.
SO IT WAS MORE THAN KIND OF A KICK THE TIRES.
IT LOOKS GOOD.
THEY WANTED TO KNOW.
REVIEWED THE ELEVATIONS AND WERE VERY DILIGENT AND THOROUGH
NOT WITHSTANDING THAT WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THEM AGAIN FOR
THE IS CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IF THE ZONING GETS
APPROVED.
06:33:03PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE ONE QUESTION.
THE WOMAN WHO CAME BEFORE YOU TALKED ABOUT ART.
WILL ART BE INCORPORATED INTO THIS.
AND IF SO, HOW.
I CAN'T REALLY ANSWER THAT.
JENNY.
06:33:18PM >> JENNIFER LATTIMORE, 1865 EAST 6th AVENUE.
WE DEVELOPED THE BRAND AROUND THE LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD
ARTISTS.
WE WANTED ARTIST TO HAVE FREEDOM -- WE HAVEN'T WORKED OUT
DETAIL YET SINCE WE ARE STILL IN THE PLANNING PHASES.
BUT WE WOULD LIKE A LOCAL ARTIST OR MULTIPLE LOCAL ARTIST TO
MAYBE INSTALL A STATUE OR SOME ARTWORK ON THE BUILDING.
WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN THAT FAR YET, BUT THERE WILL BE SOME LOCAL
ARTISTS OR MULTIPLE LOCAL ARTISTS INVOLVED IN THIS
COMMUNITY.
06:33:52PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
06:34:00PM >> WHY ALMOST -- SEEMS LIKE DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING
NECESSARY.
06:34:06PM >> THAT IS A REALLY GOOD QUESTION.
BECAUSE, LIKE I SAID, TWO-THIRDS OF THE PROJECT IS IN THE
YBOR DISTRICT WHICH HAS A LOWER RATIO THAN THE BALANCE OF
THE CITY.
THEY ONLY REQUIRE ONE SPACE PER UNIT.
WHILE THE CITY IT WAS TWO.
PLUS GUEST PARKING.
SO -- UNDER THIS --
06:34:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IF YOU WERE ONLINE AND IF YOU WERE
CONNECTED, PLEASE MUTE YOURSELF.
THANK YOU.
PLEASE PROCEED.
06:34:36PM >> UNDER THIS PROPOSAL, WE WERE ONLY REQUIRED BASED ON THESE
DIFFERENT RATIO TO HAVE 65 SPACES MORE OR LESS.
I THINK WE HAD 93.
HOWEVER THE ENTIRE PROJECT WERE IN THE NONHISTORIC DISTRICT,
WE WOULD MEET CODE.
YOU KNOW WHAT I AM SAYING.
RIGHT NOW WE ARE SHOWING A TREMENDOUS SURPLUS OF PARKING.
JUST BECAUSE OF THAT ANOMALY THAT ONE FOOT IS IN THE CITY.
AND ONE FOOT IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
06:35:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
THANK YOU.
06:35:08PM >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
06:35:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
MR. BENTLEY, I HAVE ONE.
WHAT IS THE ROOF TOP HEIGHT?
06:35:19PM >> 36 FEET.
06:35:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THE SQUARES AND RECTANGLES ON TOP OF THE
ROOF, ARE THOSE COSMETICS?
06:35:27PM >> SOME OF THOSE, LIKE, PARAPETS THAT YOU CAN GO UP TO A
CERTAIN HEIGHT AND IT IS NOT -- IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR
HEIGHT IF IT IS KIND OF ORNAMENTAL, BUT THOSE ARE -- THESE
ARE JUST CONCEPTUAL RIGHT NOW AND WE WILL HAVE SORT THAT OUT
WITH THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION.
06:35:44PM >> COUPLE OF THINGS.
I DON'T BELIEVE THEY ARE HELD TO THE RENDERINGS PER PE.
HE IS RIGHT ESPECIALLY THE PORTION WITHIN THE YBOR HISTORIC
DISTRICT.
HE WILL HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE BARRIO FOR APPROVAL OF THE
ACTUAL DESIGN.
OUR CODE ALLOWS FOR A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE FOR ROOF STRUCTURE
ARE AIR CONDITIONING, EQUIPMENT TO NOT BE COUNTED FOR
HEIGHT.
06:36:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I JUST HAVE TO ASK THE QUESTION.
06:36:14PM >> CHAIRMAN CITRO, FOR WHAT IT IS WORTH, I MENTIONED IT
EARLIER THAT THE CURRENT HEIGHT ALLOWED FOR THIS PRESENT
ZONING IS 45 FEET.
AND WE ARE AT 36.
OKAY.
THANK YOU.
06:36:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SOMETIMES I JUST HAVE TO ASK.
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PUBLIC
COMMENT?
SEEING NONE.
ANYONE ONLINE?
06:36:40PM >> YES.
06:36:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THIS MISS STROHMEYER.
WHO IS SPEAKING.
06:36:47PM >> HOLLY.
06:36:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
OKAY.
FOR THIS ITEM?
06:36:54PM >> YES.
06:36:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DO YOU HAVE YOUR CAMERA ON?
06:36:59PM >> YES, I DO.
06:37:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MISS HOLLY, PLEASE
PROCEED.
06:37:08PM >> MY GRANDMOTHER -- OUR FAMILY --
06:37:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MA'AM, JUST GIVE ME ONE SECOND, I APOLOGIZE.
IS THERE CANTY ALSO ON THE LINE?
06:37:25PM >>CLERK:
CHAIR, MR. CANTY IS ON THE LINE CITIZENS.
06:37:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I NEED FOR BOTH OF YOU TO RAISE YOUR HAND SO
YOU CAN BE SWORN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
06:37:38PM >> YES.
06:37:38PM >> YES.
06:37:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS HOLLY, PLEASE PROCEED.
06:37:42PM >> THE PROPERTY JUST SOUTH OF WHAT THEY HAVE SHARED HAS BEEN
IN OUR FAMILY FOR EVERY 75 YEARS.
AND I JUST HAVE SOME CONCERN IN TERMS OF WHAT OUR FAMILY
MIGHT WANT TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY.
TO MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT BOXED IN AND HOW DOES THIS EFFECT
OUR PROPERTY VALUE.
SO I DO HAVE QUESTIONS AS IT PERTAINS TO THAT.
REZONING WILL CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS
WELL THE AREA.
SO IF YOU CAN ADDRESS THAT IN TERMS OF HOW IT WOULD EFFECT
OUR PROPERTY VALUE.
AND THAT WE DON'T GET LOCKED IN SO THAT WE ARE NOT ABLE TO
HAVE A BUSINESS OR DO SOMETHING THAT I AM SURE THE CANTYS
WILL SHARE WITH YOU
06:38:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THIS IS NOT ZONED FOR A BUSINESS.
06:38:48PM >> PLANNING DEVELOPMENT.
I AM SAYING OUR PERSONAL PROPERTY.
HOW THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT GOING TO AFFECT WHAT WE --
06:38:57PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
THE ZONING WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR ZONING,
MA'AM.
IT DOES NOT AFFECT WHAT YOUR CURRENT ZONING IS FOR YOUR
PROPERTY.
06:39:03PM >> WHICH IS YC-5.
06:39:09PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
YOU STILL HAVE YC-5 AND DEVELOP IN A MANNER
WITH YC-5.
THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR CURRENT ZONING.
06:39:19PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SHE IS CONCERNED SHE IS LOCKED IN.
06:39:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOUR PROPERTY ZONING IS NOT CHANGING.
06:39:28PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
NOT REALLY SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER
HERE.
AND IT IS -- IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE PETITIONER WOULD
HAVE TO SHOW.
BUT, AGAIN, THIS APPLICATION EFFECTS ONLY THE PROPERTY OF
THE APPLICATION.
IT DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY.
SO YOU WILL RETAIN YOUR CC-5 ZONING.
06:39:49PM >> OKAY.
ALL RIGHT.
06:39:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MRS. HOLLY.
MR. CANTY.
06:39:59PM >> MY MOM DID A VERY GOOD JOB.
YOU GUYS HAVE ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS WE WERE CONCERNED
ABOUT.
06:40:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CANTY.
ANYBODY ELSE ON LINE?
06:40:12PM >>CLERK:
NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
06:40:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE TO MAKE PUBLIC
COMMENT.
ANY REBUTTAL.
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:40:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YEAH, SEE, I AM UNPREPARED BECAUSE -- BECAUSE
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO'S TURN.
SO I MOVE AN ORDINANCE OF FILE NUMBER REZ 22-37 ON
APPLICATION REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 1534, 1604, 1608, AND 1614 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE, 805 AND
813 EAST HENDERSON AVENUE, 1313 EAST ESTELLE STREET, FOLIO
NUMBERS 192662.0000 AND 192619.0000 FROM RM-16, CG AND YC-5
TO PD, YC-9 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED.
06:41:32PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
06:41:33PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
INCLUDING WAIVERS AND REVISIONS.
06:41:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ROLL CALL -- ANY DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
06:41:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:41:44PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:41:46PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
06:41:47PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
06:41:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:41:51PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:41:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:41:52PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING WILL BE AUGUST 25, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
06:41:59PM >> THANK YOU.
HAVE A GOOD EVENING.
06:42:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, OUR MADAM CLERK IF WE
COULD TAKE A BREAK.
SO WE WILL TAKE FIVE MINUTES. [GAVEL SOUNDING]
06:50:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CITY COUNCIL IS BACK IN SESSION.
ROLL CALL.
06:50:17PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
06:50:19PM >>LUIS VIERA:
HERE.
06:50:21PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
06:50:25PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
06:50:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
06:50:28PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL FOR YUM.
06:50:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4 IF THAT IS ALL
RIGHT WITH YOU, MISS BARNES.
06:50:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THAT MR. MILFORD ON THE SCREEN.
06:50:48PM >> MILFORD.
I WAS SWORN IN EARLIER.
06:50:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN YOU RAISE YOUR HAND.
BOTH --
06:51:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THE OTHER RIGHT HAND.
THERE YOU GO.
06:51:02PM >>CLERK:
THANK YOU.
DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE
WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
06:51:08PM >> YES.
06:51:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN YOU BRIEFLY RUN THROUGH THE THINGS YOU
ALREADY SAID.
06:51:13PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
SURE.
I WAS GOING TO INTRODUCE THE CASE AND IT URN IT OVER TO
PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN I WILL RUN THROUGH.
06:51:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MISS BARNES.
06:51:23PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZ-22-26.
FROM CG TO CN TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:51:50PM >> EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN WORN.
LOCATED IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT MORE
SPECIFICALLY IN THE TEMPLE CREST NEIGHBORHOOD.
CLOSEST TRANSIT 200 FEET SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE TO
THE CORNER OF NORTH 40th STREET AND EAST MILLER AVENUE.
TEMPLE CREST PARK IS LOCATED TWO BLOCKS WEST OF THE SUBJECT
SITE AND THE SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE EVACUATION ZONE.
THERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE LOCATED ON NORTH
GREENWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH 39th STREET AND NORTH TEMPLE
CREST CIRCLE.
THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY
RESIDENTIAL WITH A TRANSITION TO COMMERCIAL USES ALONG NORTH
40th STREET.
AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
THAT WAS MY AERIAL.
HERE IS MY FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
ALL MY MAPS WERE MESSED UP.
SORRY.
ADOPTED LAND USE.
THE SITE HAS A COMMUNITY MIXED USE DESIGNATION.
THE PINK COLOR.
THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO THE NORTH
AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT
SITE.
AND THIS IS TEMPLE CREST PARK.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED BEEN THE NORTH 40th STREET MIXED
USE CORRIDOR.
WITHIN THOSE AREAS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES A
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF WALKING AND TRANSIT THROUGH BUILDING
AND IT HE SIGN AND AMENITIES.
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF EIGHT UNITS IS UNDER THE MAXIMUM
THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
DESIGNATION.
DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY USES IN THE SURROUNDING
AREA, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES
TO HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON
VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LANDS TO ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE
SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF PRESENT
AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND IS COMPARABLE
AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUND WILLING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:54:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
06:54:18PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I AM GOING TO SPEED THROUGH THIS SINCE WE ALREADY PRESENTED
FOR.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM CG AND CN TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
USES.
THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED FOR EXACTLY EIGHT RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES SHOWN HERE.
THE SUBJECT SITE.
OUTLINED IN RED.
AS SHOWN, THERE IS A MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL USES AND ZONING
IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT EVEN THOUGH THERE IS A
WAIVER PROVIDE TO REDUCE PARKING.
THE APPLICANT IS SAVING THE GRAND TREES ON-SITE.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:55:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
MR. MILFORD.
06:55:18PM >> YES.
DeWAYNE MILFORD.
ADDRESS IS 7720 POLARA DRIVE, ODESSA, FLORIDA.
I WOULD LIKE TO APOLOGIZE FOR WHAT HAPPENED EARLIER.
WHILE ANNIE BARNES WAS PRESENTING OUR CASE, WE HAD A
LIGHTNING STRIKE HERE THAT SHUT EVERYTHING DOWN.
SO WE WERE ONLINE AND DID HEAR THAT.
SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
I WON'T DRAW THIS OUT AND TAKE ANY EXTRA UNNECESSARY TIME.
JUST WANT TO POINT OUT A FEW THINGS REAL QUICK.
AS HAS BEEN MENTIONED, CURRENT PROPERTY IS ZONED CN AND CG
THAT WILL ALLOW SOME NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES.
BUT BECAUSE OF THE SURROUNDING USES, IT DOESN'T SEEM THAT
THAT'S -- THAT'S A WISE USE FOR THE PROPERTY.
AND, OF COURSE, RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ALLOWED IN THE
COMMERCIAL ZONING FOR THE S-1 TYPE ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW.
BECAUSE OF THE SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY, THE SIZE OF THE
PROPERTY, AND THE LOCATIONS OF GRAND TREES THAT HAVE BEEN
PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, WE HAVE THREE GRAND TREES ON THE EAST
SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY.
ONE IN THE MIDDLE AND ONE ON THE -- THREE ON THE WEST AND
WITH UNIN THE MIDDLE AND ONE ON THE EAST.
THE ONE IN THE EAST IS ACTUALLY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
FOUR ON-SITE, ONE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
SO WE MET WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF EARLY ON.
AND THEY AGREED THAT TO DO WHAT WE WANT TO DO AND DO IT THE
BEST WAY THAT THE PD WAS THE WAY TO GO.
THE FUTURE LAND USE WILL HAVE MORE UNITS THAN WE AR
PROPOSING AND WE FEEL IT IS THE BEST DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERING
THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SITE ITSELF.
WE HAVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT OR E-MAIL OF SUPPORT THAT WAS
ACTUALLY SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL FROM THE TEMPLE CREST CIVIC
ASSOCIATION.
AS MISS BARNES MENTIONED WE HAVE ONE WAIVER WHERE WE HAVE
TWO PARKING SPACES PER UNIT OR 16 SPACES BEING REDUCE FROM
THE 18 REQUIRED BY CODE.
SO I WILL LEAVE IT AT THAT FOR NOW.
I WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
MR. MARTINEZ WHO IS ONLINE ALSO IS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT
TEAM IS MY CLIENT.
EITHER OF US CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS BUT WE CERTAINLY REQUEST
YOUR APPROVAL AND APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
06:58:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
PUBLIC COMMENT.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
06:58:12PM >>CLERK:
WE DON'T.
06:58:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO FAVOR IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:58:25PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION.
A ORDINANCE REZONING 8102 NORTH TEMPLE CREST CIRCLE AND 8101
NORTH 39th STREET FOR CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND CN
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO PD.
PROVIDED AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
06:58:55PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:58:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:58:57PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:58:59PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
06:59:00PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:59:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:59:02PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AUGUST 25, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
06:59:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 7.
06:59:17PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES.
ITEM NUMBER 7, REZ-22-38.
REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY 3201 WEST TAMPA BAY
BOULEVARD AND 4005 LINCOLN AVENUE FROM RS-50 AND PD TO PD
AND I WILL TURN OVER THE PRESENTATION TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
06:59:47PM >> EMILY PHELAN WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE STADIUM
NEIGHBORHOOD AREA.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED WITHIN A HALF A MILE
NORTH ON WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD.
AL LOPEZ PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED
WITHIN ONE MILE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND THE SITE
IS LOCATED WITHIN LEVEL E OF THE EVACUATION ZONE.
THE AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE WHICH I OUTLINE IN
PURPLE.
THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS A MIXTURE OF
LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
WHICH IS HERE.
HERE IS A MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
RESIDENTIAL-10 WHICH IS THE ORANGE COLOR AND THE
RESIDENTIAL-20, WHICH IS THE BROWNISH COLOR.
THE SURROUNDING AN AREA HAS RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE NORTH AND
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
RESIDENTIAL-20 TO THE WEST.
AND PUBLIC, QUASI-PUBLIC TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
WHICH IS THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
UNITS TO BE LIMITED TO THE PERIPHERY OF THE ESTABLISHED
SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORS.
THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR TEN SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
RESIDENTIAL UNITS A ITS AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 10.86 UNITS
PER ACRE WHICH IS CONSISTENT TO THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 AND RESIDENTIAL-20 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS.
ADDITIONALLY, THE REZONING WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING
ON AN UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED USES OF
INTENSITY ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
ANTICIPATED IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
07:01:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
07:01:53PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGAIN, REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS-50 AND PD TO PD.
SHOW YOU AN OVERALL -- OVERHEAD MAP -- OR AERIAL OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN HERE.
IT HAS THIS UNUSUAL L OR T SHAPE.
IT IS APPROXIMATELY -- THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY.92 ACRES IN
SIZE.
THE PORTION ALONG NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE IS DEVELOPED WITH A
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOME AND PORTION ALONG TAMPA BAY
BOULEVARD IS DEVELOPED WITH BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
THERE ARE SEVERAL RESIDENTIAL -- RESIDENTIAL IN SCHOOL AND
COMMERCIAL USES IN THE GENERAL VICINITY.
HOWEVER, PROPERTY NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
IS ZONED RS-50.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED BUILDINGS WITH A TOTAL OF 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
UNITS, SHOWN HERE.
HERE IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED.
MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL BUILDING HEIGHT IS 35 FEET.
AND VEHICULAR ACCESS PROVIDE FROM WEST TAMPA BAY BOULEVARDS,
NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A WAIVER TO ALLOW TWO UNITS --
UNITS TWO 3-10 TO HAVE NOT FACING THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
STAFF REVIEWED SECTION 27-136, I BELIEVE IT IS -- YES, 136,
AND FOUND THAT THE UNUSUAL SHAPE OF THE PARCEL WARRANTS THIS
WAIVER REQUEST.
AND WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO DEVELOP UNDER A STANDARD EUCLIDIAN
ZONING DISTRICT.
SO STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST INCIDENT IS, AND I AM AVAILABLE
-- OH, LET ME SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE SHOWN HERE
IS THE PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE USE.
AND THEN THIS IS THE SITE ALONG LINCOLN.
THERE ARE -- THIS IS TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD, AS WELL AS THE
OFFICE USE -- OR THE SCHOOL USE FURTHER ALONG THE STREET.
SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
07:04:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS BARNES?
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:04:29PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THAT TAMPA BAY ELEMENTARY?
07:04:32PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
YES, I THINK SO.
I BELIEVE YOU ARE CORRECT, YES.
07:04:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
PETITIONER.
WE HAVE SOMEBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THERE.
WHO IS THE PETITIONER?
07:05:04PM >> GOOD EVENING.
AARON MAYERS, REZ BY MEZ DEVELOPMENT LLC.
WE ARE A TAMPA CORPORATION.
I AM A HOMEOWNER AND RESIDENT AND SPLIT MY TIME BETWEEN MY
OFFICE AND TEXAS.
ALSO CALLING IN ON THE LINE IS THE ARCHITECT ON THE PROJECT
JAMIE REYNOLDS AND WE WILL BE TOUCHING BASE WITH HIM
SHORTLY.
OUR GOAL IS TO INVEST IN THE COMMUNITY AND WE WANT TO INVEST
IN AREAS THAT MAY NOT BE SEEING THE SAME BENEFITS THAT
RESIDENTS IN OTHER PARTS OF TOWN ARE SEEING.
IF YOU LOOK SEVERAL BLOCKS TO WESTSHORE.
LOOK SOUTH TO NORTH HYDE PARK WHERE WE CURRENTLY RESIDE.
EAST SEVERAL BLOCKS TO TAMPA HEIGHTS.
ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS WHOSE HOME VALUE HAVE BENEFIT FROM
DEVELOPERS LIKE MYSELF AND WHOSE INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN
IMPROVED TO SUPPORT THAT GROWTH.
STREETS SURROUNDING OUR PARCEL, WE ARE WORKING TO -- WE ARE
WORKING TO REZONE HAVE NOT SEEN THE SAME ECONOMIC BENEFIT OR
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT.
AND VALUE ARE THOSE BEHIND WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS.
THIS IS A VIEW OF WHAT WAS 4005 NORTH LINCOLN WITH A
RENDERING OF OUR PROJECT.
CITY PLANNING KNOW THE PARCELS IN OUR AREA.
WHEN MANY ARE ZONED RS-50, THEY ARE HOME TO AN ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, MEDICAL OFFICES.
TO THE NORTH IS A SMALL TOWN HOME COMMUNITY.
HOME TO MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS.
TO REZONE OUR PARCEL FROM RS-50 TO PD TO A PD TO HAVE
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOMES IS VERY MUCH IN THE GOALS OF
INTENTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY AND FITS WELL WITHIN THE
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD.
ECONOMIC SUPPORT IN THIS AREA WILL PROVIDE NEW HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY FOR EXISTING TAMPA RESIDENTS OR OPPORTUNITIES
FOR NEW RESIDENTS ALLOWING FOR THE CITY TO EXPAND ITS TAX
BASE.
WE HOPE BE TOO LEADER IN THIS PART OF THE COMMUNITY.
WE HOPE WE CAN WORK TO DEVELOP OTHER PROPERTIES IN THIS
IMMEDIATE AREA.
WE HOPE OUR INVESTMENT ENTICES OTHERS TO FOLLOW OUR LEAD AND
JOIN US IN INVESTING IN THIS AREA.
SHOULD KNOW OUR NEIGHBORS AT THE OPTIMAL WOMEN'S CENTER 3203
WEST TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD HAS EXPRESSED THEIR REPORT IN
WRITING FOR OUR PROJECT AS OUR NEIGHBORS AT 4007 NORTH
LINCOLN AVENUE.
THEY ALSO EXPRESS SUPPORT FOR OUR PLAN FOR OUR SHARED BORDER
FROM ARCHITECTURAL VALUE AND SAFETY.
OUR EASTERN BORDER IS THE TAMPA BAY ELEMENTARY.
3201 WEST TAMPA HAS BEEN VACANT FOR YEARS AND FALLING APART.
IT HAS BEEN NEGLECTED.
IT HAS BEEN BROKEN INTO.
THE FRONT DOOR IS CURRENTLY BROKEN INTO.
AND IT IS VANDALIZED.
THIS IS NOT SAFE FOR ANY COMMUNITY.
CERTAINLY NOT SAFE FOR THE TAMPA BAY ELEMENTARY.
THAT IS OUR NEIGHBOR TO THE EAST.
IN ADDITION TO VANDALISM, OUR BORDER BETWEEN MY DEVELOPMENT
AND THE SCHOOL HAVE SICK TREES THROUGH RUSTY CHAIN-LINK,
BROKEN WOOD FENCING, FALLEN TREE THAT'S NOBODY IS CARING
FOR, AND DANGEROUS TO OUR CHILDREN.
BY APPROVING OUR REZONING REQUEST AND ALLOWING OUR
DEVELOPMENT TO MOVE FORWARD, WE WILL IMPROVE THE SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES AS WELL, BUT SPECIFICALLY WE WILL MAKE THE AREA
SAFER FOR THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS.
WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL VERY POSITIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH
REPRESENTATIVES SPECIFICALLY FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THEM TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THIS PROJECT
WILL BE CAREFULLY DEVELOPED WITH THE SAFETY OF STUDENTS IN
MIND AND THE END RESULTS IS BENEFICIAL TO THE SCHOOL AND TH
COMMUNITY IN GENERAL.
I HAVE BEEN FORTUNATE TO WORK WITH OJMR, TALENTED
ARCHITECTURE GROUP FOCUSED ON SUSTAINABILITY AND STAYING
GREEN.
I WILL TURN THE REST OF THE PRESENTATION OVER TO JAY
REYNOLDS.
07:09:04PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF I MAY ASK, WHERE IS THAT BUILDING AT?
07:09:07PM >> THIS BUILDING?
07:09:08PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:09:09PM >> THAT IS A VIEW ACROSS 3201 BEST TAMPA THE SCHOOL PARKING
LOT TO THE RIGHT.
AND THAT IS THE RENDERING OF OUR PROPERTY.
07:09:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THAT IS THE RENDERING.
07:09:21PM >> THIS WOULD BE A DIRECT RENDERING, SIR, OF 3201.
07:09:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THE REASON I ASK.
I SAW THAT AND I SAID I NEVER SEEN THAT BUILDING THERE.
IT HAD ME CONFUSED.
07:09:34PM >> A SPEAKING FROM THE VIEW FROM THE ELEMENTARY.
07:09:35PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I WAS PINCHING MYSELF SAYING I NEVER SEEN
THAT BUILDING THERE.
07:09:39PM >> GIVE IT TIME.
GIVE IT TIME.
I TURN IT OVER TO JAY.
I WILL -- I WILL BE SHARING SOME SLIDES AS HE TALKS, IF THAT
IS ALL RIGHT.
07:09:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
EXCUSE ME, GENTLEMEN.
YOU ARE ONLINE.
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
07:09:59PM >> I DO.
07:09:59PM >> I DO.
07:10:01PM >>CLERK:
THANK YOU.
07:10:02PM >> JAY REYNOLDS, ARCHITECT.
THANK YOU, AARON.
AND WE APPRECIATE SAYING A COUPLE OF POINTS TO FURTHER OUR
CONSIDERATION HERE FOR ONE, WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE --
THE DIFFICULT IN THE TIGHT SITE AS ANDY HAD MENTIONED AS
WELL.
AND STORMWATER, CURRENTLY WORK WITH ENGINEERING AND WE WILL
CONTAIN THE WATER.
AND ENOUGH OF A DRIVEWAY NOW THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY TAKE MOST
OF THAT AND IF NOT ALL INTO THAT CONCRETE WALL THAT AARON IS
SHOWING YOU ON THE DRAWING.
WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP THIS
NEIGHBORHOOD AS I THINK DANNY TOUCHED ON AS WELL.
THE DENSITY THAT WE ARE ASKING IS FAR LESS THAN WHAT WE
COULD PUT ON.
I THINK IN AN URBAN LEVEL.
AND CONTEXTUALLY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IT IS NICE.
WE HAVE GOT -- DEALING WITH ISSUES ON THE SITE.
AND OTHER ONE WE WANTED TO MENTION TOO IS THE HEIGHT OF THE
BUILDING.
SO WE ARE CURRENTLY IN A 35-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT.
WE ARE AT 32, BUT WE HAVE BULKHEADS.
WE HAVE A TRI-- THREE LEVEL AND A DUAL-LEVEL ROOFTOP DECK IS
PROPOSED AND THE BULK HEAD -- IT IS ACCESSED UP TO THE ROOF
DECKS.
AND TO GET VERTICAL SHAFTS DOWN FOR HVAC DOWN TO THE UNIT.
THESE WILL COMPRISE TO 5.4% AND THE MASS SOMETHING IN THE
MIDDLE PART OF THE BUILDING.
TAKING GREAT CARE AND THE NEIGHBORS TO THE EAST, THE SCHOOL
AND ALSO TO THE RESIDENTIAL, WHICH, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE
SITE PLAN, THE SEVEN UNIT AND ARE PROPOSED TO BE AT A MUCH
DENSER, YOU KNOW, DENSITY ALONG -- AND HEIGHT ALONG EACH
PROPERTY LINE.
SO THOSE ARE THE TWO AREAS THAT I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT AND
TOUCH ON.
AND WE ARE CERTAINLY EXCITED TO BE MAKING A MARK IN THE CITY
OF TAMPA AND LOOK FOR OTHER OPPORTUNITIES AND OPEN IT UP FOR
ANY QUESTIONS.
07:12:19PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
UNFORTUNATELY WHILE YOU WERE SPEAKING FOR
SOME REASON THEY WEREN'T SHOWING THE IMAGES ON THE ELMO.
IF YOU COULD JUST SHOW SO THE PUBLIC CAN SEE -- WE HAVEN'T
-- IF YOU CAN -- THANK YOU.
07:12:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
JUST YOUR SITE PLAN.
07:12:32PM >> AARON --
07:12:34PM >> JAY, TELL ME WHAT --
07:12:36PM >> I CAN ONLY SEE OURSELVES.
SO I REALLY CAN'T SEE THE --
07:12:41PM >> THIS IS THE SITE PLAN, IF YOU WANT TO SORT OF TALK
THROUGH THAT.
07:12:45PM >> RIGHT, THAT IS FINE.
SO I CAN MEMORIZE THAT.
THERE IS A BOX IN THE MIDDLE, KIND OF LONG LINEAR IN THE
DRIVEWAY.
THIS IS WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT, ABOUT THE STORM RETENTION
AND HOW WE ARE SOLVING THAT ON THE SITE AND THE ACCESS IN
THE DRIVEWAY.
BUT, AGAIN, YOU SEE, THAT THERE IS A SITE PLAN OF THE SEVEN
UNITS OVER TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THREE UNITS
TO THE BACK.
MITIGATING THE HEIGHT OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY AND THE
COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE WEST.
IF YOU WANT PUT UP OF THE RENDERING OF THE EXTERIOR ON THE
EAST SIDE FROM THE SCHOOL SKIED.
WE CAN SEE THE BULKHEAD AND TALK OF THE ISSUE OF THE HEIGHT
AND HOW WE ARE MITIGATING THE HEIGHT OF THE PORTION OF THE
-- OF THE BUILDING THAT IS AT 38 FEET.
AND, AGAIN, THE BULKHEAD IS FOR STAIRWAY ACCESS, LIGHT
ACCESS INTO THE FLOORS DOWN BELOW AND TO GET VERTICAL SHAFT
FOR THE ROOFTOP AC UNITS ON THE ROOF.
SO THOSE, AGAIN, COMPRISE OF 5.4% OF THE OVERALL ROOF AREA.
WE HAVE STUDIED AND WORKED HARD ON TRYING TO GET THOSE
INTERNALIZE TO MITIGATE THE HEIGHT TO THE NEIGHBORS ON THE
EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
07:14:00PM >> SO 32 FEET IS THE HEIGHT OF 90-PLUS PERCENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AND JUST THE CONVEYANCE TO THE ROOF DECK.
NOT A LIVING SPACE, BUT THE BULKHEAD FOR THE STAIRWELL, 38
FEET AND 6% OF THE LOWER SPACE THE ROOF LEVEL.
YOU MENTION THIS WAS AN ELEVATION.
I THINK HE MENTIONED IT SEEING IT IN RENDERING FORM AND YOU
CAN SEE THEM POPPING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT.
07:14:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
07:14:36PM >> YES, MA'AM.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
07:14:47PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
NO?
THANK YOU, DOES THAT CONCLUDE YOUR PRESENTATION, SIR.
07:14:52PM >> IT DOES.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:14:54PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU, SIR.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS
ITEM?
THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 7, REZ 22-38.
I HEAR AND SEE NO ONE.
ANYONE ONLINE REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
07:15:10PM >>CLERK:
YES, WE DO.
07:15:12PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALL RIGHT.
GO AHEAD.
I SEE MARTA MONTERO.
IS THAT CORRECT?
07:15:23PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MARTA, IF YOU WERE ON, PLEASE TURN ON
YOUR VIDEO, YOUR CAMERA SO WE CAN SEE YOUR FACE.
AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN.
07:15:34PM >> IT IS TELLING ME THAT MY WEB CAM IS ALREADY SHOWN, BUT I
AM NOT SEEING THE OPTION TO -- HOLD ON.
IT IS TELLING ME ONLY THAT MY WEB CAM IS ALREADY SHOWING.
07:15:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
COUNSELOR --
07:15:59PM >>MORRIS MASSEY:
UNFORTUNATELY WE CAN'T SEE YOU AND WE NEED
TO SEE YOU IN ORDER TO TAKE YOU ARE IN TESTIMONY.
07:16:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE TO SEE YOU VISUALLY TO BE ABLE TO
TAKE YOUR TESTIMONY.
CAN YOU PLEASE CHECK ALL THE -- SOMETHING WAS ALMOST
HAPPENING.
PLEASE KICK ON -- CLICK ON YOUR CAMERA ICON.
THAT LOOKS LIKE IT IS COMING UP.
07:16:28PM >> OKAY.
I DID CLICK ON THAT.
07:16:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND SOMETHING -- SOMETHING IS HAPPENING, BUT
WE CAN'T SEE YOU.
07:16:35PM >> OKAY.
DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH LIGHT IN THE ROOM?
07:16:46PM >> I DO.
07:16:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS YOUR CAMERA BEING COVERED BY SOMETHING?
07:16:51PM >> NO, IT IS NOT.
I HAVE IT SET UP TO BE SEEN.
AND I WAS SEEING MYSELF CLEARLY.
07:16:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS YOUR FAMILIAR A FACING YOU?
07:17:00PM >> IT IS, IT IS.
AND I DID CLICK VIDEO ICON.
IT SAYS PEOPLE CAN SEE YOU.
07:17:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE CANNOT --
07:17:10PM >> BUT YOU ARE NOT.
07:17:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE CAN NOT SEE YOU.
UNLESS WE CAN SEE YOU, WE CANNOT TAKE YOUR TESTIMONY BECAUSE
YOU NEED TO BE SWORN IN TO GIVE TESTIMONY.
07:17:20PM >> I UNDERSTAND.
LET ME TRY ONE MORE TIME.
OKAY.
07:17:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THERE YOU GO GO.
07:17:31PM >>YAY!
07:17:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HANDS TO BE SWORN
IN.
[SWEARING IN]
07:17:38PM >> I DO.
THANK YOU.
I HAVE SOMETHING WRITTEN IF I MAY.
GOOD EVENING CHAIRMAN CITRO, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME THE TIME TO TALK, SHARE MY
THOUGHTS.
MARTA RODRIGUEZ MONTERO, 4021 NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE.
A PROUD RESIDENT OF WEST TAMPA SINCE MY PARENTS MOVED THERE
IN 1971.
I LOVE WEST TAMPA FOR HISTORY, WARMTH OF NEIGHBORS WHO TAKE
CARE OF EACH OTHER LIKE FAMILY AND CERTAINLY FOR ITS
LOCATION.
THAT IS CLOSE TO EVERYTHING.
WEST TAMPA IS AN OLD NEIGHBORHOOD.
SADLY THE ORIGINAL RESIDENTS ARE PASSING AWAY, BUT NEW
FAMILIES ARE LEARNING HOW WONDERFUL IT IS TO LIVE IN WEST
TAMPA.
FOR YEARS NOW, BUILDERS HAVE COME TO WEST TAMPA, TORN DOWN
THE ORIGINAL HOMES ABOUT BEAUTIFUL PORCHES AND BIG LOTS AND
BUILD MULTIPLE TWO-STORY HOUSES SQUEEZED INTO LAND THAT WAS
PREVIOUSLY HOME OF ONE HOUSE.
COUNCILMEMBERS, ESPECIALLY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO AND
MIRANDA, YOU ARE AWARE OF THE EXPLOSION OF DEVELOPMENT IN
WEST TAMPA, WHICH I WELCOME.
UNFORTUNATELY, THE OLDER RESIDENTS OF WEST TAMPA DID NOT
KNOW TO CONSIDER DOING WHAT RESIDENTS OF SEMINOLE HEIGHTS
AND HYDE PARK DID AND DEMAND THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION MAINTAIN
THE LOOK AND FEEL OF ORIGINAL WEST TAMPA NEIGHBORHOODS.
WEST TAMPA IS NOW LOSING ITS CHARACTER.
THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO ALL THE NEW HOMES BEING BUILT.
SOME ARE BEING BUILT WITH PORCHES AND CURBS AND WARMTH.
OTHERS HAVE SQUARE LOOKS AND LOOK OUT OF PLACE FOR WEST
TAMPA.
THESE TEN NEW TOWN HOUSES SCHEDULED TO BE BUILT ON TAMPA BAY
BOULEVARD IS NICE IF YOU WERE LOOKING FOR MODERN-STYLE
HOMES.
THEY ARE SQUARE.
THEY ARE TALL.
I UNDERSTOOD -- I UNDERSTAND THAT NEIGHBORHOODS CHANGE.
CHANGE CAN BE GOOD.
BUT I DO WISH THESE NEW TOWN HOUSES HAVE MORE OF THE WEST
TAMPA DESIGN AND FEEL SO THE NEW RESIDENTS COULD FEEL PROUD
OF LIVING AT WEST TAMPA WITH THE HISTORIES, WARMTH AND
LOCATION.
ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS THE IMPACT THAT THE NEW TOWN HOUSES
AND ADDITIONAL RESIDENTS WILL HAVE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD
INCLUDING TRAFFIC ON TAMPA BAY BOULEVARDS, WHICH IS ONLY TWO
LANES.
AND IS THE PRIMARY STREET FOR TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL.
THE SCHOOL IS TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND
RAYMOND JAMES STADIUM.
MY BIGGEST CONCERN WITH THE TEN TOWN HOUSES IN ADDITION TO
THE LISTED THREE-STORY UNIT WITH APPROXIMATELY 2600 SQUARE
FEET, IT ALSO ADVERTISES THE MOST UNIQUE SPLIT-LEVEL ROOF
DECKS FOR PRIVATE FAMILY GATHERINGS.
THE TOWN HOUSE ALSO BE TOWERING OVER AND LOOKING DIRECTLY
DOWN AT TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
NOW MY LIGHT WENT OFF.
THE PRIVATE FAMILY GATHERINGS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
WATCH THE CHILDREN AT PLAY OR JUST WALKING ON CAMPUS.
THESE PRIVATE FAMILY GATHERINGS WILL BE TOWERING OVER AND
LOOKING DOWN AT THE SINGLE-FAMILY FAMILIES ON WEST TAMPA.
THESE THREE STORY UNITS WILL LOOK OUT OF PLACE AND I
UNDERSTAND THE BUILDERS WANT TO BUILD MORE ON SMALL PLACES
THEY HAVE.
SO THEY GO UP, BUT WHAT I PROPOSE IS THESE HOMES GOING SO
FAR UP THAT THEY ARE NOW BEING ABLE TO LOOK DOWN AT THE
CHILDREN, AT MY NEIGHBORS AND AT ME.
SO I OPPOSE THE EXTRA HEIGHT REQUESTED AND THE PROPOSED ROOF
DECK FOR FAMILY GATHERINGS.
I WELCOME ALL NEW DEVELOPER TO MAKE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS LOOK
BETTER.
I JUST DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE, AND I CAN TELL YOU I HAVE
SPOKE WITH MANY OTHER NEIGHBORS ON LINCOLN AVENUE.
07:21:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MISS MONTERO.
07:21:24PM >> THANK YOU.
APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
07:21:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
OUT OF COURTESY, I WILL GIVE THE PETITIONER
EXTRA 30 SECONDS IN REBUTTAL IF THEY SO WISH.
07:21:33PM >> I DO.
YEAH, I WILL TAKE IT.
AARON, DO YOU WANT TO PUT UP --
07:21:37PM >> LET ME JUMP IN REAL QUICK, JAY.
FIRST OF ALL, I APPRECIATE THE NEIGHBOR'S THOUGHTS.
COUPLE OF THINGS.
WITH REGARD TO TRAFFIC ON TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD BEING THAT WE
ARE APPROXIMATELY HALF MILE EAST OF RAYMOND JAMES STADIUM, I
THINK THE ABILITY MUCH CAR TO COME AND GO HAVE BEEN DESIGNED
FOR 80,000 PEOPLE.
THE ADDITIONAL TEN ADDITIONAL HOMES WHERE THERE ARE
CURRENTLY TWO PROPERTIES I DON'T THINK WILL MAKE A
DIFFERENCE.
AS FAR AS THE OVERHANGS OF THE ROOF DECKS, THEY DO NOT LOOK
OUT ON THE SCHOOL.
IF SHE HAD LOOKED AT THE SITE PLAN, THEY ACTUALLY LOOK ON
THE INTERIOR OF THE COURTYARD OF THE PROPERTY.
AND WITH REGARDS TO FIT INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NO, WE DO NOT
HAVE CARS PARKED ON THE GRASS DRIVEWAYS.
AND NO WE DO HAVE SIDEWALKS SO I THINK A LOT OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS WE ARE TRYING TO BRING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE
NOT ARBITRARY, AND IN FACT, I THINK IT FITS INTO THE CULTURE
AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:22:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYTHING ELSE IN YOUR REBUTTAL?
07:22:37PM >> NO, I THINK YOU COVERED IT.
IT'S FINE.
07:22:40PM >> WE ARE GOOD.
07:22:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
BEFORE WE PROCEED TO CLOSE, IS THERE ANY
COMMENTS OR ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS?
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:22:48PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO, I AM NOT GOING TO SAY ANYTHING
REGARDING THE ZONING, BUT I THINK THE -- THE ITEM THAT WE
SAID ABOUT PARKING -- ON THE GRASS IS -- NORTH PART OF YOUR
PRESENCE.
I TAKE THAT TO -- I AM NOT GIVING YOU ANYTHING BUT GOOD
ADVICE.
07:23:09PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:23:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:23:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
07:23:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:23:22PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
FILE NUMBER REZ-22-38, ORDINANCE BEING
PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
3201 WEST TAMPA BAY BOULEVARD AND 4005 NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE
IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS RS-50 TO PD TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:23:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, HAVE YOU SECONDED THAT?
07:24:00PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I HAVEN'T SAID A WORD.
07:24:02PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WILL SECOND IT CITRO.
07:24:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:24:09PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:24:12PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:24:14PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NO.
07:24:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:24:21PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:24:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:24:24PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.
MANISCALCO VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON AUGUST 25, 2022
AT 9:30 A.M.
07:24:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NUMBER REZ-22-40.
07:24:41PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER 8 IS REZ-22-40.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 110 SOUTH BOULEVARD.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY STRIP SHOPPING
CENTER RETAIL INCLUDING BANK, DRIVE-IN WITH OFFICE USES.
I AM AVAILABLE -- LET ME TURNING IT OVER TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
AFTER THEIR PRESENTATION, I WILL DO MINE.
07:25:10PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR LAST CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
AND WITHIN THE HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE CDC PERIPHERAL BOUNDARIES AND
HYDE PARK NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
TRANSIT SERVICES -- TRANSIT SERVICE IS PROVIDED
APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG WEST
CLEVELAND STREET.
WEST CLEVELAND OF HART TOP TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL
AND BRITTON PLAZA.
SNOW PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY .1 MILES
TO THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS EVACUATION ZONES B AND C.
HERE IS AN AGE YELL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
SURROUNDING -- PROPERTIES.
AND ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST CLEVELAND STREET AND
SOUTH BOULEVARD.
NORTH OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA'S
CAMPUS.
THE SURROUNDING AREA CONTAINS A MIXTURE OF USES.
WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE SITE, WHICH
CONTAINS PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES AND THERE ARE
SOME RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN A COUPLE OF BLOCKS WEST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
LIKE I SAID, IT IS NORTH OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE ENTIRE SUBJECTS SITE IS WITHIN THE REGIONAL MIXED
USE-100 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT UP TO 3.5 F.A.R. OR 100 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE.
AS I NOTED EARLIER THE SITE IS WITHIN THE CDC PERIPHERY
WHICH ALLOWS ADDITIONAL DENSITY ON THE SUBJECT SITE THROUGH
A BONUS WITH THE CDC BONUS.
THE SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR UP TO 200 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE OR 7.0 F.A.R. THE MAXIMUM.
RMU-100 IS ON KENNEDY, NORTH SIDE, OUR PARCEL UNDER
THE UMU-60 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
ONE BLOCK WEST, THE RESIDENTIAL-35.
AND HALF BLOCK LAND UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
DESIGNATION.
THE PD PROPOSES OVER 279,000 SQUARE FEET OF MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT AND AN OVERALL F.A.R. OF 6.34.
THE APPLICANT IS UTILIZING THE CDC PERIPHERY BONUS FOR
ADDITIONAL INTENSITY ON THE SITE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
IT COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE.
CONTAINS A RANGE OF BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SEVERAL MIDRISE
EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN THE
VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS WELL AS A 26-STORY MIXED USE
BUILDING EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF
WEST CLEVELAND STREET.
THE PD PROPOSES A 23 HON STORY STRUCTURE THAT IS COMPARABLE
AND WITHIN THE RANGES OF SURROUNDING TOWERS IN THE AREA.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AS DEFINED
IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE REQUEST PROVIDES INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS AND
ORIENTED TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE PROPOSED 192 DWELLING UNITS WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION IN AN
AREA OF THE CITY WHERE LAND IS PRESENTLY UNDERUTILIZED.
THE NEW HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WILL BE ADJACENT TO TWO
TRANSIT STOPS WITHIN HALF A MILE OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT.
AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA AND IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST
WILL PROMOTE A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT
WITH THE CITY STRATEGY WITH INCREASED AVAILABLE OF HOUSIN
AND PRESENT WALKING AND TRANSIT.
AND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
FURTHERMORE, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT TO WHAT IS
ANTICIPATED THROUGH THE RMU-100 AND PERIPHERY BONUS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL ALLOW FOR ANY
QUESTIONS.
SETH.
07:30:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. COLLINS?
07:30:07PM >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
REZ # 2-40, REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY 110 SOUTH BOULEVARD
FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
MULTIFAMILY, OFFICE, STRIP SHOPPING CENTER RETAIL, BANK OR
DRIVE-IN.
SIX WAIVERS ASSOCIATE WITH THIS REQUEST.
IN SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS .159 ACRES.
CURRENTLY WITH A BANK DRIVE IN.
NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST CLEVELAND STREET AND SOUTH
BOULEVARD.
AND SHOWN HERE IN RED.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
SO 192 UNITS, APPROXIMATELY 275,819 SQUARE FEET.
AND 2996 SQUARE FEET OF STRIP SHOPPING CENTER RETAIL
INCLUDING BANK DRIVE-IN USES.
HOWEVER, TO BE NOTED THAT WHEN REVIEWING THE REVISED SITE
PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED OR PRIOR THIS HEARING, THERE IS A
BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS
REQUEST.
THOSE NUMBERS -- I KNOW THE APPLICANT WILL UPDATE.
THEY WILL BE REDUCED IN ORDER TO MAKE -- TO MEET THAT
6.34 FAR.
THE APPLICANT -- AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 27-140, THE
APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AMENITIES THAT WE WILL
APPLY TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT OR SIMILAR
PROJECTS WITHIN THE AREA.
STAFF REVIEWED SECTION 27-136.
ALTHOUGH THE MASSING AND THE HEIGHT WASN'T NECESSARILY -- IT
WAS COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA.
THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA.
THE ISSUE WAS THE NUMBER OF WAIVERS REQUESTED, SPECIFIC --
ESPECIALLY IN REFERENCING NATURAL RESOURCES AND
TRANSPORTATION RELATED WAIVERS.
SO LET ME SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED.
THIS IS THE SITE.
AND IT IS SHOWING SOME OF THE QUEUEING FOR THE BANK
DRIVE-IN.
I AM SURE THE APPLICANT WILL SHOW THE ELEVATIONS.
THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE AS IT IS TODAY.
THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE SITE.
THIS IS DIRECTLY BEHIND THE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE.
AND THIS IS FACING -- THIS IS ALONG SOUTH BOULEVARD FACING
EAST.
AND SHOWN HERE IS CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN
VICINITY.
AND DIRECTLY SOUTH IS THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
ADDITIONALLY I KNOW BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT THE
WAIVER REGARDING THE PARKING WILL BE AMENDED AS WELL.
SO IT WILL BE A 47% REDUCTION NOT A 45% REDUCTION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
07:33:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS BARNES?
THANK YOU.
PETITIONER.
07:33:51PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
TYLER HUDSON, EAST ASHLEY DRIVE.
IF WE CAN CUE UP THE POWERPOINT.
SO HERE ME WITH EVENING DEAFEN AND IN TOWN GROUP WHO ARE THE
DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROJECT.
ABBY CLARK, A CIVIL ENGINEER WITH MY LAW FIRM IS HERE.
AND INITIALLY RICKY PETERIKA ASSISTED ON THIS PROJECT.
CERTIFIED ARBORIST.
MANY OF STAN TECH DESIGN GROUP ARE HERE.
LET'S JUMP IN.
IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL TO ZOOM OUT OF IT.
THE YELLOW LINE THAT YOU SEE IS THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT PERIPHERY.
THE RED STAR IS THE LOCATION OF THE.
ISSING A IMPACTFUL THE CDC, AS DANIEL ALLUDED TO ALLOWS YOU
TO DOUBLE THE INTENSITY ON THE SITE AND SIGNIFICANT AND
BECAUSE OF OBVIOUS REASONS BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY TO
DOWNTOWN AND AREAS LIKE CHANNEL DISTRICT, PORTIONS OF YBOR,
ENCORE, SOUTHERN TAMPA HEIGHTS, THEY ARE ALL IN THE SAME
DENSITY ALLOTMENT OF THIS SITE AND IMPORTANT TO BEAR IN MIND
WHEN WE TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THE SITE AND SOME OF ITS
INCONSISTENCIES.
A HAIR UNDER ONE ACRE AND IT IS WORTH NOTING WE ARE NOT IN
A CRA, IN AN OVERLAY DISTRICT NOR ARE WE IN A HISTORIC
DISTRICT.
THIS IS THE NORTHERNMOST PIECE OF THE NATIONAL HYDE PARK
HISTORIC DISTRICT BUT FOR THE PURPOSES THIS EVENING, IT IS
NOT RELEVANT.
NOT TO GET EVERYBODY TOO DIZZY.
GOING EAST, THIS IS HELPFUL TO SHOW HOW CLOSE THIS SITE IS
TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
AS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER, THE PROJECT DESIGNED
AND MARKETED TO UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA STUDENTS.
AS YOU CAN SEE .3 MILES.
ONE BLOCK SOUTH.
IT IS HELPFUL TO SEE THE SHAPE OF THIS SITE.
IT IS NOT A SQUARE.
NOT A RECTANGLE.
IT IS BOTH MASHED TOGETHER WHICH CREATES A LITTLE BIT OF A
ISSUE IN SITE DESIGN THAT I WILL TALK ABOUT.
A RENDERING OF THE PROPOSED SITE THE BANK AT THE BOTTOM
WHERE THE 2800 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COME FROM.
THERE WILL BE 182 DWELLING UNITS.
THAT IS THE NUMBER 182.
THE SITE PLAN IN FRONT OF YOU HAS A SLIGHTLY LARGER NUMBER
BUT 182 WILL BE CORRECTED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR IN THE INTEREST OF CLARITY, THIS IS A
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND NOT TOWARD THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA.
IT IS WHO IT WILL BE MARKETING FOR.
A COMPLETELY PRIVATE STUDENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
AS ANNIE ALLUDE TO PAYING A $2.7 MILLION BONUS PAYMENT.
NOT REALLY AMENITIES OR PROJECTS AT THE IMMEDIATE SITE THAT
THE BONUS COULD FUND.
SO THE FUNDS WILL GO TO THE CITY OF TAMPA AND THEY ARE
TENTATIVELY EAR MARKED FOR A COUPLE OF COMPLETE STREET
PROJECTS.
2.7 MILLION IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER FOR COMPLETE STREETS.
I THINK IT MIGHT BE EASIER IF I SWITCH TO THE ELMO TO WALK
THROUGH HOW THE SITE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO FUNCTION.
CAN YOU ALL SEE?
GREAT.
UP IN NORTH.
THIS IS FIELDING.
YOU COME DOWN FIELDING, FROM THE INDOOR PERSPECTIVE.
AND WE DO NOT OWN THAT PARCEL.
ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO GET IN THE SITE.
DRIVE IN HERE TO A COUPLE OF PARKING SPACES.
MORE IMPORTANTLY THIS IS A DRIVE-THRU THAT CUTS THROUGH THE
SITE AND YOU CAN EXIT ONLY HERE.
ONE OF THE MOST INTERESTING FEATURES OF THIS PROJECT THAT IS
UNUSUAL FOR TAMPA AND MAYBE LARGER OLDER CITIES, IT DOES
HAVE A PEDESTRIAN USE.
NEWS.
THIS CUTS THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE.
AN OPEN AIR THROUGH CONNECTION TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO GET FROM
EITHER SIDE OUT OF THE BUILDING TO FIELDING IF THEY WANT TO
ACCESS CAMPUS THAT WAY OR BOULEVARD IF THEY WANT TO GO THAT
WAY.
I WILL EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT OF THE REASONING FOR THAT AND I
WILL HAVE A RENDERING FOR YOU.
JUST TO BE CLEAR, A PEDESTRIAN SORT OF -- ESSENTIALLY AN
ENCLOSED KIND OF BEAUTIFIED SIDEWALK THAT WE THINK WILL BE A
POPULAR FEATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
IF WE CAN SWITCH BACK TO THE POWERPOINT.
IN TERMS OF THE EXISTING CONDITION.
A BANK OZK.
IT WILL BE A BANK OZK WITH A HOUSING COMPLEX ON TOP OF.
WITH THE STUDENT HOUSING NEED, THERE IS AN ACUTE -- THERE IS
A HOUSING SHORTAGE THAT STRETCHES ACROSS THE ELEMENTS OF THE
CITY.
IN TERMS OF FOLKS ON STUDENTS AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA
STUDENT POPULATION, MY CLIENT COMMISSIONED A PRIVATE MARKET
STUDY TO LOOK AT THE HOUSING STUDENT DEMAND AND THE REPLIES.
FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD MAP.
WE CAN'T SEE BECAUSE OF THE CLOSED CAPTIONING BUT WE KNOW
WHAT THE UNDERGRAD STUDENT POPULATION IS FOR THE UNIVERSITY
OF TAMPA 11,600 FULL-TIME.
10,200.
WE KNOW THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA PROVIDES 5,000 BEDS ON
SKEET.
WE KNOW THERE ARE 1200 BEDS FOR OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING.
AND THAT INCLUDES -- DON'T WANT TO BE OVERLY PRESUMPTUOUS.
THIS PROJECT AND OTHER PROJECTS THAT COUNCIL APPROVED THAT
AREN'T UNDER CONSTRUCTION THAT LEAVES A DEFICIT OF 4,000
BEDS AND A PROJECT LIKE THIS WILL BE ABLE TO CONSOLIDATE A
DECENT AMOUNT OF THE STUDENT POPULATION THIS CLOSE TO CAMPUS
IN A WALKABLE WHERE YOU CAN WALK TO A GROCERY STORE IS A
GREAT WIN FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND FOR THE UNIVERSITY
COMMUNITY.
WE DO HAVE A CONSISTENCY FINDING FROM THE PLANNING
COMMISSION WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY VERY IMPORTANT.
A CORNERSTONE HAVE A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE OF A SOUND ZONING
DECISION AND SEVERAL REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS IN THE CITY OF
TAMPA DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH ANY PROJECT I HAVE THE
PLEASURE OF BRINGING BEFORE THIS COUNCIL IN THE CDB
PERIPHERY.
IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO ADHERE TO EVERY SINGLE ELEMENT OF
THE ZONING CODE.
SO WE HAVE SOME WAIVERS.
IN YOUR RECORD YOU HAVE A FAIRLY SUBSTANTIAL WAIVER
JUSTIFICATION MEMO AS WELL AS A MEMO WHY WE BELIEVE WE
COMPLIED WITH THE PD PURPOSE IN 27-136.
BUT INDULGE YOU TO WALK THROUGH THE WAIVERS RIGHT NOW.
FIRST IS BUFFERING.
SO IN THE CODE, PARKING LOTS ARE REFERRED TO AS VEHICULAR
USE AREAS FOR SOME REASON AND THIS HE THEIR OWN SEPARATE
BUFFERS.
FOR THESE PARTICULAR PARKING LOTS, A EIGHT-FOOT SPACE
BETWEEN ITS PARKING LOT AND THE STREET.
IN THIS CASE WE ARE ASKING FOR FIVE FEET AND A LOT OF THE
WAIVERS ARE DRIVEN BY THE FACT WE HAVE THAT CUT THROUGH IN
THE BUILDING.
INSTEAD OF A SINGLE MASS, THERE WILL BE A CUT THROUGH THAT
PUSHES THE NORTHERN PIECE UP, SOUTHERN PIECE DOWN.
SECOND IS SETBACK.
THIS IS A LITTLE UNUSUAL WAIVER.
TYPICALLY YOU DON'T SEE WAIVERS FOR SETBACKS IN PDs.
BECAUSE ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS TO DO A PD IS TO ESTABLISH
YOUR OWN SETBACKS AND NOT DEAL WITH THE SETBACKS IN THE
STANDARD ZONING DISTRICTS.
CODE PERTAINS CERTAIN STREETS IN COMPANY THAT CAN CONSIDERED
SPECIAL, A 42-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE CENTER LINE TO THE
PROPERTY.
WE ARE ONLY ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE 36 WHICH FOR A DENSE URBAN
ENVIRONMENT LIKE THIS IS ENTIRELY APPROPRIATE.
CANDIDLY, SIGNIFICANT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE REALLY A BIT
INCONSISTENT, STREET FACING ORIENTATION, PEDESTRIAN
ORIENTATION AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE -- A RENDERING OF WHAT WE DISCUSSED, WHAT
THE CUT-THRU WILL LOOK LIKE.
THE GOAL IS TO AVOID TOO MUCH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON
CLEVELAND WHICH THOUGH IT HAS A SPEED LIMIT OF 35, NOT ALL
CITIZENS OF TAMPA HONOR THAT AT ALL TIMES.
AND IT CAN BE A BY THE OF A DANGEROUS THING FOR UT STUDENTS
FOR ANYONE TO WALK.
THIS IS PART OF THE IDEA OF BRING THAT PEDESTRIAN EAST, WEST
TRAFFIC INTO AND INTERNAL AND A LITTLE BIT OF A SAFER
ENVIRONMENT.
TREES, WE HAVE ONE TREE.
AND THAT IS A SINGLE NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREE.
THAT IS LOCATED TO THE FRONT OF THE SITE, BY APPLYING THE
PROTECTED RADIUS OF THE TREE TO THE SITE, AFTER TWO
REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION ATTEMPTS.
WE WERE NOT ABLE TO PRESERVE IT.
AND RICKY PETERIKA HAS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, BUT THE SHORT
ANSWER IT WOULD HAVE REQUIRED AN EXCEPTIONALLY TALL BUILDING
THAT WOULD BE FAR OUT OF CHARACTER AND LIMITED OUR ABILITY
TO ACCOMMODATE THAT MUSE THAT I TALKED ABOUT THAT CUT
THROUGH THE SITE.
WE ARE NOT DOING THIS BY ENORM NEWS AMOUNTS, BUT WE ARE
EXCITING THE PARKING GREEN SPACE ENVIRONMENT SLIGHTLY AS
WELL AS THE GENERAL GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.
ONE MORE COMMENT ON THE TREES.
WHAT YOU ARE SEEING ON-SITE IS THE PROPOSAL.
WE ARE PROPOSING TO PLAN -- IT IS 19 CANOPY TREES.
ANOTHER NOT PALM TREES AND SOMETIMES NOT ENTHUSIASM FOR
PLANTING PALM TREES BECAUSE THEY DON'T PROVIDE MUCH SHADE.
WE ARE ROW MOVING ONE GRAND TREE TO REPLANT A SIGNIFICANT
NUMBER SO THE BOULEVARD IN PARTICULAR AND FIELD THE FRONT OF
THE FRONTAGE ON THE RIGHT SIDE GIVES COVERAGE FOR THE URBAN
CANOPY.
I DON'T THINK I EVER BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL THAT DOESN'T
HAVE A LOADING BERTH.
AND THESE UNITS ARE ALL GOING TO BE FURNISHED.
NO CIRCUMSTANCE OF WHICH A LARGE MOVING TRUCK WILL COME INTO
THIS SITE.
LOADING BERTHS HAVE AN ENORM NEWS OPPORTUNITY COST AND THE
SIZE.
SO WE ARE GOING TO PROVIDE ONE 12 X 30 LOADING BERTH AND WE
FEEL IT IS ACCURATE.
AND THE DELIVER RICE THAT GREG -- UBER EATS.
THEY WILL NOT BE USING ANY PRESIDENT OF LOADING BERTHS.
WE NEED THE WAIVER FOR THE ONE CONTINUOUS MANEUVER.
THE WAY LOAD SOMETHING GOING TO WORK, YOU COME SOUTH ON
FIELDING PAST THE ACCESS POINT AND A TRUCK WILL
THEORETICALLY BACK IN AND PULL OUT -- BUT WE DO NOT
ANTICIPATE REALLY ANY LOADING JUST GIVEN THE NATURE OF THIS
USE AND THE FACT THAT THESE UNITS ARE FURNISHED.
PARKING -- BEFORE TALK OF THE REDUCTION LET'S TALK OF THE
ACTUAL REQUIREMENT.
THIS EXACT SAME PROJECT FIVE BLOCKS EAST ACROSS THE RIVER
INTO DOWNTOWN, IT WOULD HAVE TO HAVE 180 PARKING SPACES.
IN YBOR CITY OR THE CHANNEL DISTRICT LIKEWISE IN THE CDB
PERIPHERY 191 SPACE.
BUT DUE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF ITS LOCATION IT IS REQUIRED
HAVE 395 PARKING SPACES.
THE PROJECT DESIGNED FOR STUDENTS THAT ATTEND ONE BLOCK
NORTH, 395 WILL BE BE A GROSS AMOUNT OF OVERPARK SO WE ARE
PROPOSING 210 SPACES, 12 OF WHICH WILL GO TO THE RETAIL, THE
BANK THAT WILL REMAIN ON-SITE AND THE REMAINDER OF WHICH
SERVE THE STUDENT POPULATION.
GREG DEVELOPING PRIVATE FOR STUDENTS.
AND THE HENRY DOWNTOWN AND SEVERAL BLOCKS AWAY, NOT ONE
BLOCK AWAY LIKE THIS PROJECT.
I THINK THE PARKING ESTABLISHED -- I WOULD LIKE TO USE THE
REMAINING TIME FOR GREG TO TALK ABOUT HIS EXPERIENCE.
07:45:57PM >> THANKS, TYLER.
THANK YOU, CITY COUNCIL.
GREG MINTER.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP MULTIPLE PROJECTS IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA.
AND I AM DEVELOPING MULTIPLE PROJECTS NOW WITH MY PARTNERS,
DEVELOPMENT VENTURES GROUP.
WE MOST RECENTLY DEVELOPED THE HENRY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
TOWN AND SKY POINT ELEMENT.
500 HARBOUR ISLAND.
OTHER LAND USE CHANGES.
I LEARNED A LOT OF THE COUPLE ASPECTS OF DESIGN THAT ARE
IMPORTANT.
AS THE AREA GETS MORE AND MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY, WE
WANTED TO FOCUS OUR PROJECT ON THE PEDESTRIAN AND NOT
NECESSARILY ON VEHICLES GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE PRIMARY
STUDENT POPULATION IN THE AREA IS MORE ADAPT TO USING
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, FOOT TRAFFIC, LIME SCOOTERS, BICYCLES,
ETC., INSTEAD OF THEIR VEHICLES TO COMMUTE TO AND FROM THE
CAMPUS.
AS TYLER MENTIONED, WE FINISHED THE HENRY JUST OVER A YEAR
AGO.
THAT PROJECT -- WE BUILT APPROXIMATELY 200 PARKING SPACES
FOR THE STUDENT POPULATION -- 300 PARKING SPACES FOR THE
STUDENT POPULATION AND ONLY LEASED TWO-THIRDS OF THE PARKING
SPACES.
TWO-THIRDS AND THREE QUARTERS THAT REPRESENT 1.8 PARKING
SPACES PER UNIT IN THAT BUILDING OF ACTUAL OCCUPIED PARKING.
WHAT WE BUILT OR DESIGNED TO BUILD IN THIS BUILDING WOULD BE
APPROXIMATELY 1.15 PARKING SPACES FOR EVERY UNIT.
SIMILAR IN RATIO, BUT SLIGHTLY LESS AND A MUCH CLOSER
PROJECT TO CAMPUS.
BECAUSE OF THAT, WE THINK THAT DOES JUSTIFY A LITTLE BIT
MORE WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THE PARKING WAIVER IS BASED ON
EXPERIENCE AND ACTUAL DEMAND RATHER THAN JUST TRYING TO, YOU
KNOW, GAUGE THE MARKET OR FOCUS GROUP THE MARKET.
WE HAVE EXPERIENCE IN DOING IT.
WE RUN A SHUTTLE FROM THAT PROPERTY.
THIS PROPERTY HERE WON'T USE A SHUTTLE OR NEED A SHUTTLE
BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY.
IT WILL TAKE LONGER TO DRIVE TO CAMPUS THAN WALK.
THAT IS ANOTHER REASON FOR THE JUSTIFICATION.
SOME OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT TYLER MENTIONED WAS THE
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS THROUGH THE BLOCK ITSELF.
BUT ALSO DEVELOPED AND DESIGN INTO OUR PROJECT AND PROJECT A
FRONT PORCH THAT MIMICS THE CHARACTER OF HYDE PARK AND
BRINGS IN AN OPPORTUNITY FOR STUDENTS TO MEET AND CREATE
THEIR FRIENDS.
AND INSTEAD OF DOORS THAT EMPTY OUT DIRECTLY ON TO THE
STREET.
THAT IS IMPORTANT FOR US BECAUSE WE FELT IT WAS A WAY TO
WARM UP THE BUILDING AND GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE
BUILDING TO FACE THE STREET WITH ACTIVE USES AND LIMITED IN
THE AMOUNT OF RETAIL STOREFRONT THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO US.
APPEAR BANK BRANCH OCCUPYING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
PROPERTY.
DOES NOT PRESENT AN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RETAIL OR ACTIVE
STOREFRONT USE.
THE BALANCE OF THE SPACE ALONG -- ALONG BOULEVARD WAS
NECESSARY FOR ACCESSING THE BUILDING BOTH FROM A BUILDING
SERVICES DIDN'T AND ALSO FOR THE PEDESTRIAN.
SO ONCE WE DESIGNED ALL THAT INTO THE PROJECT, WE WERE KIND
OF LIMITED.
LASTLY, I WILL LET YOU KNOW THAT WE HAVE GOT -- A LOT OF
EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPINGA A CORE DOWNTOWN AND PERIPHERY
AREAS OF DOWNTOWN LIKE HARBOUR ISLAND.
I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE
PROJECT.
WINDY WE BELIEVE IT WILL SERVE THE COMMUNITY VERY AS WELL
AND THERE IS INCREASED DEMAND.
ONE OF THE COMMENTS, WE WATCH THE AN AREA TO CONTINUE TO
GROW AND MARKET RATE DEMAND WHILE THE STUDENT POPULATION
CONTINUES TO SQUEEZED OUT, WE FIGURED THAT OUT AND
CONSOLIDATED UPSCALE STUDENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IS
NECESSARY.
THANK YOU.
07:49:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:49:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAD A QUESTION.
I -- I AM -- I AM FINE WITH THE PARKING, DENSITY.
MY CONCERN IS WITH THE SIDEWALKS.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH CLEVELAND
AND NORTH BOULEVARD.
07:50:13PM >> THE SIDEWALK ALONG BOULEVARD.
BECAUSE WE ARE NOT REDEVELOPING THE ENTIRE BLOCK IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS THERE.
AND, AGAIN, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO
MEET THE STREET WITH THAT FRONT PORCH.
THAT PIECE ITSELF KIND OF EXTENDS THE SIDEWALK IN A LOT OF
WAYS.
INSTEAD OF DOING IT AT GRADE, WHICH WE COULD HAVE DONE,
ELEVATED IT SLIGHTLY LIKE THE FRONT PORCHES OF HYDE PARK
THAT GAVE IT CHARACTER AND SPACE FROM THE STREET.
CAN HE COULD ACTUALLY PUT THEM ALL AT GRADE, AND I THOUGHT
THAT WOULD BE MISSING THAT CHARACTER AND OPPORTUNITY FOR
UNIQUENESS FOR THIS PROJECT.
SO BASED ON THE FACT THAT SOUTH OF HERE REALLY IS THE
CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY AND CLEVELAND, IT DIDN'T FEEL LIKE
BEYOND OUR FRONT DOOR WE WILL INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SOUTH.
ONE OF THE REASONS WE FOCUSED THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING
WHERE THE MUSE PUNCHES THROUGH THE BUILDING.
NORTH IS THE SPACE THAT ISNESSED FOR OUR STUDENT AND STUDENT
POPULATION.
07:51:16PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
DO YOU HAVE ACTUAL NUMBERS?
07:51:19PM >> I DO.
BECAUSE I AM BLIND NOW, I WILL HAVE TO READ MY SITE PLAN.
I BELIEVE OUR SCALE IS APPROXIMATELY -- OH, THANK YOU.
WE ARE SIX FEET -- SIX-FOOT-WIDE SIDEWALK WITH A LANDSCAPE
ELEMENT ALONG BOULEVARD.
AND ON THE CLEVELAND SIDE BECAUSE A VERY HEAVY VEHICULAR
ROADWAY, FIVE FEET.
BUT A SMALL PEDESTRIAN -- LANDSCAPE ZONE BETWEEN THERE AND
THE STREET.
07:51:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:51:47PM >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
07:51:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:51:51PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. MINTER, WELCOME.
HAVEN'T SEEN YOU IN THREE YEARS.
07:51:56PM >> STILL DOING DEVELOPMENT, JUST HAVEN'T BEEN IN FRONT OF
THE COUNCIL.
07:51:59PM >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR VISION AND WORK YOU HAVE DONE
DOWNTOWN.
07:52:01PM >> THANKS.
07:52:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SO JUST ON THE PARKING POINT AGAIN.
SO YOU BOTH EXPLAINED A LOT ABOUT IT, BUT JUST IN CASE
SOMEBODY FIVE YEARS FROM NOW SAID THAT STUPID CITY COUNCIL
-- ONE MORE QUESTION ABOUT IT.
YOU HAVE A LOT OF EXPERIENCE WITH -- YOU REALLY WERE THE
MODERN CATALYST FOR DEVELOPMENT DOWNTOWN.
BUT WHEN WE A YEAR AGO -- SO WE STARTED CHARGING FOR PARKING
IN THE NORTHERN SIDE OF DOWNTOWN.
AND THE PEOPLE IN YOUR TWO BUILDINGS THAT YOU DEVELOPED A
LONG TIME, THE ELEMENT AND THE OTHER ONE.
SEVERAL FOLKS COMPLAINED TO US AND SENT US SCATHING E-MAILS.
ONE SAID NOW MY GIRLFRIEND WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR PARKING.
I ASKED THE PEOPLE IN THE CITY AND THEY SAID PLENTY OF PARK
THE BUILDINGS, THEY MUST NOT WANT TO PAY FOR IT.
WHAT IS YOUR -- WHAT IS YOUR VIEW ON THIS?
I KNOW YOU MENTIONED THE OTHER PROJECT YOU DONE RECENTLY,
BUT -- WHAT -- WHAT IS THE MARKET DEMAND FOR THIS.
AND HOW WOULD -- HOW WOULD PARKING WORK.
TWO AND A HALF -- YOU CAN'T ASSIGN ONE AND A HALF.
YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A BIDDING SYSTEM FOR THAT?
07:53:10PM >> IT IS INTERESTING.
A VERY GOOD QUESTION.
BECAUSE THE TARGET MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCT DETERMINES A LOT
OF THAT PARKING RATIO IN MY MIND.
WE ARE WATCHING A POPULATION OF YOUNG ADULTS 18 TO 22 YEARS
OLD.
THE MOBILITY OPTION FOR THEM IN THIS LOCATION ARE NUMEROUS.
MUCH MORE ADAPT -- ADEPT AT USING UBER AND LYFT.
THEY USE SCOOTERS LIKE CRAZY.
THEY WALK EVERYWHERE.
THEY WILL BICYCLE EVERYWHERE.
THEY CHOOSE TO DO THOSE KIND OF THINGS BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY
HAVE A LOT OF SERVICES THAT ARE BROUGHT TO THEM.
AND UBER EATS.
AND SYSTEMS OF ACCESSING FROM INSIDE-OUTSIDE APPROACH.
WHEN IT COMES TO THE ACTUAL PARKING DEMANDS, THE COST OF
THAT PARKING HAS AN INFLUENCE OVER HOW MANY PEOPLE, HOW MANY
CARS END UP IN THE BUILDING.
AND ALSO BACK TO THE NUMBER OF USES.
HOW MUCH THAT PARKING RATIO NEEDS TO BE.
IF I WAS GO TO DEVELOP MORE OF A BUILDING FOR SALE OR
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WHERE I AM SELLING UNITS, THAT PROJECT
WILL DEMAND A LITTLE BIT OF A HIGHER PARKING RATIO BECAUSE
PEOPLE LIKE TO HAVE THEIR FIXED KNOWN PARKING SPACE.
AND THEY LIKE TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE FOR THEMSELVES AND
POTENTIALLY A GUESS PARKING SPACE OR A SECOND PERSON LIVING.
AND APARTMENTS TEND TO BE UNASSIGNED, RIGHT.
AND MORE OPPORTUNITY TO FLOAT WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE AND
FLEXIBILITY WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE AND NOTHING EVERYBODY
IS AT HOME AND NOT EVERYBODY IS IN THE UNIT.
PEOPLE ON VACATION, TRAVELING FOR WORK, WHATEVER THE REASON
IS, IT BRINGS IT DOWN AND YOU GOT TO ALLOCATE THE NUMBER OF
SPACES BASED ON CONTINUED DEMAND LIKE BUILDING TO THE
WALMART FOR CHRISTMASTIME.
YOU BUILD TO THE LARGER NUMBER, NOT THE SMALLER NUMBER.
WITH THE STUDENT POPULATION WE TRACK THIS HEAVILY.
WE SPEND A LOT OF TIME LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL DEMAND.
OUR PROJECT AT THE HENRY.
BEING FURTHER AWAY FROM CAMPUS AND OPERATING THE SHUTTLE, WE
EXPECTED A LOT MORE STUD TO TAKE US UP ON THE PARKING
OPPORTUNITY.
CAMPUS PARKING IS UNAVAILABLE FOR FRESHMEN AND DESCRIBED FOR
ALL SOPHOMORES, JUNIORS AND SENIORS.
GIVEN THAT, WE EXAMINE TO HAVE A LOT MORE DEMAND.
WHAT WE ARE HEARING AND SEEING IN OUR ACTUAL LEASE NUMBERS
AND SURVEYS AND DISCUSSIONS WITH STUDENTS, FEWER AND FEWER
OF THEM ARE BRINGING THEIR CARS BECAUSE THE ONLY REASON THEY
HAVE THEM IS TO GO OUT TO THE BEACH.
THAT IS REALLY THE PRIMARY REASON THAT SOMEONE BRINGS THEIR
CAR HERE.
65% OF THE STUDENT POPULATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA
FROM THE NORTHEAST.
ANOTHER NOT DRIVING HOME.
THEY ARE FLYING HOME.
CARS ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO GO TO FARTHER FLUNG PLACE THAT'S
WE WOULD NORMALLY UBER, LYFT, SCOOTER OR ETC.
LONG STORY TO EXPLAIN THAT WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME STUDYING
VARIOUS TARGET MARKETS OVER DEVELOPMENT CAREER IN DOWNTOWN.
I WATCH PARKING RATIOS AND DEMAND DECREASE TO OVER TIME.
IT USED TO BE OUR FINANCING GROUPS -- BANKS PRIMARILY WILL
PUSH OUR PARKING RATIOS UP AS HIGH AS THEY COULD BELIEVING
THAT WE ARE A DRIVING CITY WHICH WE ARE AND PARKING RATIOS.
I THINK IT IS A MIXED BAG WHEN IT COMES TO THE FEEDBACK YOU
HAVE GOTTEN.
YOU HEAR A VOCAL MINORITY OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE A PROBLEM
AND A SILENT MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO ARE FINE WITH THE
PARKING RATIOS.
THAT IS THE ANSWER I GIVE.
MAY HAVE GIVEN IT SHORTER BUT THE REASON WE HAVE IT.
07:56:49PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
07:56:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
I HAVE ONE.
THIS IS 22 FLOORS.
07:56:59PM >> YES.
07:57:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WITH A PENTHOUSE.
07:57:05PM >> YES.
07:57:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WANT TO PARTY WITH THAT STUDENT.
IS GOING TO HAVE THE PENTHOUSE.
PLUS PARAPETS.
NOW FOR -- FOR ME PERSONALLY, DEFINE THIS CONSISTENT AND
COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREAS.
HOW MANY OTHER BUILDINGS -- LET'S JUST SAY HALF A MILE.
22 STORIES WITH A PENTHOUSE.
HOW MANY OTHER BUILDINGS ARE COMPATIBLE WITHIN, LET'S JUST
SAY HALF A MILE.
07:57:38PM >> ONE OF THE THINGS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOTED THAT THE
AREA HAVE A LOT OF STRUCTURE THAT ARE -- LACK OF A WORD,
INEFFICIENT FOR THE LANDS AREA THEY ARE DESIGNATED FOR
FUTURE USE.
THE CDB PERIPHERY OVERLAY ON THIS AREA AND PROPERTY.
TRANSITIONAL SPACE BETWEEN THE SUBURBAN AREA TO AN URBAN
AREA.
22 STORIES RELATIVE TO DOWNTOWN IS NOT VERY TALL.
22 STORIES TO THE ADJACENT EXISTING USES IS A LITTLE BIT
TALLER.
ALTICE IS NOT MUCH SHORTER TO THE EAST.
APPROVED PROJECTS THAT ARE MUCH TALLER IN THE SAME ZONING
DISTRICTS.
ONE JUST RECENTLY TRADED AND SOLD LAFAYETTE SQUARE PROPERTY
APPROVED BY THIS COUNCIL MANY YEARS AGO.
AND IS, YOU KNOW -- I THINK THEY ARE ALLOWED TO GO -- LOOK
AT THE NUMBERS -- PRETTY TALL.
350 TO 400 FEET.
AND THEN THERE WAS ANOTHER PROPERTY WITH -- THAT SITS ON
CEDAR THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR ABOUT 25 STORIES TO ARE 26
STORIES.
ALL IN THE SAME ZONING DISTRICT.
LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IS THERE TODAY, WHAT
IS ALLOWED BY LAND USE, AND WHAT IS ALREADY APPROVED THAT
HAVEN'T NECESSARILY BEEN BUILT.
SO WHEN WE APPROACH THIS, WE LOOKED AT THOSE AND IMAGERY
ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
WE THINK IT IS CONSISTENT BECAUSE BY PUSHING THE BUILDING A
LITTLE BIT TALLER AND ALLOWING THE GROUND PLAY TO DO WHAT IT
IS DOING ON THE SITE.
WE CREATE A BETTER URBAN ENVIRONMENT FOR THAT CORNER AND AN
ANCHORING CORNER TO THE DISTRICT.
I THINK IT SETS A TONE.
IF ARCHITECTURALLY TREATED WELL AT THE GROUND FLOOR IS LESS
SIGNIFICANT OF HOW THE GROUND FLOOR -- THAT BUILDING MEETS
THE STREET.
HOW DOES IT FEEL WHEN -- WHAT IS THE CHARACTER AND USE OF
THE GROUND LEVEL.
IS IT ACTIVE?
DOES IT DO THE THINGS I MENTION TO YOU?
IS IT WELCOMING?
WHEN I WALK AROUND DOWNTOWN TAMPA, I LOOK GENERALLY ABOUT 25
FEET UP AND I STOP ABOUT THERE.

THAT IS THE SAME KIND OF CHARACTER AND FEEL WE ENVISION FOR
THE PROPERTY AND USE.
I THINK WE SIT SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN THE SUBURBAN USE AND THE
URBAN USE AND I THINK THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING
DISTRICT.
07:59:46 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I'M ONLY ONE VOTE UP HERE.
07:59:48 >> OKAY.
07:59:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SO YOU'RE ASKING ME TO THINK OF THIS AS A
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGN AS OPPOSED TO PRESENT LAND USE
DESIGN.
07:59:55 >> FUTURE APPROVED LAND USE DESIGN, YES.
07:59:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
08:00:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WELL, I HATE TO GO ON THIS PIGGYBACK
STORY, BUT WHEN YOU SPEAK ABOUT THAT AREA THAT YOU'RE
TALKING ABOUT THE BUILDINGS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AT THE
TIME THEY WERE BUILT, THEY WERE BUILT ACCORDING TO WHAT WAS
NEEDED.
THE DIFFERENCE IS NOW THAT THE BUILDINGS THAT YOU NEED ARE

COMING UP WITH A BUILDING THAT YOU NEED NOW.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA CERTAINLY 60 YEARS AGO, 40 YEARS AGO
HAD A POPULATION OF SOMETIMES 800, 1,000, 2,000.
NOW THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA'S POPULATION IN STUDENTS IS
LARGER THAN PRINCETON AND WAKE FOREST.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU KNOW THAT.
BUT THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING AROUND NOT ONLY
THAT AREA, BUT AROUND MOST OF THE AREAS OF DOWNTOWN.
WHEN YOU GO BACK AND LOOK, ANALYZE DOWNTOWN 25 YEARS, THERE
WERE 600 PEOPLE PLUS 6 WALKING THE STREETS.
GET INTO THE JAILHOUSE WHERE THE OTHER 600 WERE.
NOW IT'S GROWN TO OVER 20,000, 30,000.
THE POPULATION AND THE BUILDINGS COME ONLY IF THEY ARE
NEEDED.
NOBODY IS GOING TO FINANCE A BUILDING AND BUILD A BUILDING
IF THEY THINK IT WILL BE EMPTY.
THAT'S MY FEELING.
I'M NOT HERE TO QUESTION ANYONE ELSE, BUT I'M JUST SAYING
YOU HAVE TO BE A REALIST TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S HAPPENING.
AND SOMETIMES I MAKE MISTAKES AND YOU AND I GO TO THE SAME
BARBER, IT HAPPENS HOW IT IS.
AND THAT'S WHAT LIFE IS ALL ABOUT.
THINGS CHANGE.
I'VE CHANGED.
I'VE GOTTEN YOUNGER.

BUT THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT HAPPEN IN LIFE, AND YOU HAVE
TO BE COGNIZANT OF THE FACT THAT AROUND YOU, YOU GOT TO
REALIZE WHAT'S HAPPENING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S HAPPENING.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:01:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS.
08:01:44 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
08:01:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE'VE GOT TO TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT.
08:01:48 >> THANK YOU.
08:01:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SIR, SIR, THANK YOU.
SOMETIMES I'M GUILTY OF PLAYING DEVIL'S ADVOCATE WITH
MYSELF.
I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND MY POSITION.
08:01:56 >> UNDERSTAND.
ABSOLUTELY.
08:01:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE CONCERNING
THIS?
MS. STROHMEYER IS STILL NOT ONLINE.
THANK YOU.
MOVE TO CLOSE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:02:10 >> AYE.
08:02:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
08:02:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NUMBER REZ 22-40, MOVE AN ORDINANCE
BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING, AN ORDINANCE REZONING
PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY --
08:02:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
EXCUSE ME, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
08:02:31 >> I'M SO SORRY.
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WANT IT ON THE RECORD, AND I CAN GIVE IT TO LEGAL AS WELL,
THE UPDATED NUMBERS AS PART OF THE REVISION SHEET.
I JUST WANT IT ON THE RECORD THAT THERE'S 182 UNITS AND
2,871 SQUARE FEET OF THE BANK FOR TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
263,427 SQUARE FEET FOR AN F.A.R. OF 6.34, AS WELL AS THE
REVISION TO THE PARKING.
SO 395 REQUIRED TO 210 PROVIDED.
I JUST WANT THAT CLEAN ON THE RECORD.
08:03:10 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
JUST TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE, SHALL WE OPEN
UP AGAIN FOR THAT?
08:03:29 >>MORRIS MASSEY:
ON THE SAFE SIDE --
08:03:31 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO OPEN BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
MS. BARNES, JUST FOR THE RECORD, JUST SO EVERYTHING IS CLEAN
AND ABOVEBOARD.
08:03:41 >>ANNIE BARNES:
ANNIE BARNES, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I HAVE PASSED OUT THE UPDATED UNITS.

182 AND I CAN'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD THE SQUARE
FOOTAGE BUT IT EQUALS 6.34 F.A.R. TO MATCH THE BPA PROVIDED.
AND THEN THE REDUCTION OR THE UPDATED NUMBERS AND REDUCTION
IN THE PARKING WAIVER.
08:04:02 >>MORRIS MASSEY:
WHEN YOU MAKE THE MOTION, I THINK YOU MAY
WANT TO REFERENCE THE UPDATED INFORMATION THAT WAS HANDED
OUT BY MS. BARNES AND HAS BEEN FILED -- SUBMITTED TO THE
CLERK.
08:04:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF I HAVE TO READ THIS, A PARKING WAIVER,
I'VE GOT TO READ THE REMAINDER OF THE CITY'S 395 SPACES.
IT'S HERE.
NOT THAT I WANT TO DO THAT.
I'LL DO WHATEVER IS NEEDED.
08:04:23 >>MORRIS MASSEY:
I THINK YOU NEED TO MOVE THE ORDINANCE AND
JUST REFERENCE THAT, I GUESS, BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING THOSE NUMBERS WILL BE UPDATED AND REVISED PER THE
HANDOUT THAT MS. BARNES --
08:04:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PER THE REVISION SHEET.
08:04:37 >>ANNIE BARNES:
CORRECT.
08:04:39 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
08:04:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
FILE NUMBER 8, REZ 22-40, MOVE ORDINANCE
BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.

AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
110 SOUTH BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION OP (OFFICE PROFESSIONAL) TO PD (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, STRIP SHOPPING
CENTER, RETAIL, BANK, DRIVE-IN); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
ALONG WITH THE ITEMS THAT MS. BARNES PUT IN REGARDING THE
WAIVERS AND REGARDING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
08:05:23 >>MORRIS MASSEY:
THE REVISIONS --
08:05:25 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THAT SHE HANDED OUT TO THE COUNCIL AND
WILL BE ADDRESSED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND THE
ACTUAL NUMBERS.
08:05:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
08:05:42 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
08:05:43 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
08:05:44 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
08:05:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
08:05:46 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
08:05:47 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
08:05:48 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
08:05:52 >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON AUGUST 25th,
2022, AT 9:30 A.M.
08:05:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
INFORMATION REPORTS.
LET'S GO TO COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AGAIN.
08:06:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I SKIP, SIR.
08:06:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK?
08:06:09 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES, OUR DISCUSSION LAST WEEK WHERE WE WENT
IN CIRCLES OVER THE YBOR MAGISTRATE ISSUE.
I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF REVIEW SECTION 27-61 OF
THE CODE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS ON HOW TO IMPROVE OR
SIMPLIFY THE VARIOUS REVIEW PROCEDURES.
08:06:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN
HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:06:39 >> AYE.
08:06:40 >>LYNN HURTAK:
AND I HAVE A SECOND.
I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION REQUESTING THAT ON OCTOBER -- AND I
DON'T HAVE A CALENDAR IN FRONT OF ME, SO IF THE CLERK HAS A
PARTICULAR DATE -- OCTOBER 6th.
I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION REQUESTING THAT ON OCTOBER 6th,

DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT STAFF AND THE CITY'S LEGAL
DEPARTMENT APPEAR BEFORE CITY COUNCIL AND GIVE AN UPDATE AND
STATUS REPORT ABOUT FILE CM 21-69408, THE PUBLICLY INITIATED
TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE GOOD NEIGHBOR NOTICE REQUIREMENTS THAT
WAS INITIATED IN JUNE OF 2021 AND DETAIL WHERE IT IS IN THE
PROCESS TO AND THE NEXT STEPS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN.
08:07:27 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:07:34 >> AYE.
08:07:34 >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU.
08:07:36 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO?
08:07:39 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I HAVE A MOTION.
THIS IS A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET AN
ADOPTION HEARING FOR TA CPA 22-09 ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 AT
5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE
CITY CLERK WITH THE FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
08:07:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:08:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION ALSO REQUEST BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET AN ADOPTION HEARING FOR

TA CPA 22-10 AND TA CPA 22-11 ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2022,
5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY
CLERK WITH THE FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
08:08:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:08:33 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
08:08:38 >>LUIS VIERA:
JUST ONE, IF I MAY, PLEASE.
JUST SOMETHING I MENTIONED EARLIER TODAY FOR THE FAMILY OF
THE LATE JUDGE ROBERT FOSTER, JUST COMMENDATION FOR HIS
LIFE'S WORK, ET CETERA.
08:08:50 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
08:08:57 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES, I WONDER IF YOU ALL WOULD ALLOW US TO
GIVE A POSTHUMOUS COMMENDATION TO RICK NAFE AND DO IT IN
PERSON SO THAT HIS FAMILY COULD BE HERE.
YOU ALL KNEW WHO HE WAS.
SUCH A BIG GUY, BUT A GIANT IN WHAT HE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS
COMMUNITY AND HOW HE CHANGED THIS COMMUNITY.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION.

WHEN IS THE NEXT COMMENDATION MEETING?
SEPTEMBER 6 COMMENDATION FOR RICK NAFE.
08:09:34 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:09:39 >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
THAT'S IT.
08:09:42 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
DID WE ACKNOWLEDGE MR. TIM BURKE IN THE
AUDIENCE?
08:09:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
GO AHEAD.
08:09:48 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I SEE HIM ALL QUIET IN THE BACK.
IT'S A SPECIAL TREAT.
08:09:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I'D LIKE TO FIRST OFF, I WAS GOING TO WRITE
A LETTER EXCUSE ME, A REQUEST FROM PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF WMNF
MS. LAURA TAYLOR ASKED TO WRITE A LETTER PROPOSING, FROM THE
CITY COUNCIL TO PROPOSE OR HELP PROPOSE BRINGING BACK
TROPICAL HEAT WAVE MUSIC FESTIVAL TO YBOR CITY.
IT HAS NOT BEEN AROUND FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
IT BEGAN IN 1981.
I WOULD LIKE FOR THIS TO COME FROM ALL OF CITY COUNCIL.
AND I'M JUST LOOKING TO SEE IF WE'RE OKAY WITH A LETTER OF
RECOMMENDATION FROM TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO BRING BACK
TROPICAL HEAT WAVE.
08:10:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
-- I HAVE TO FIND OUT WHAT THE FUNDING
MECHANISM IS IN CASE THEY ARE LOOKING FOR FUNDING FROM US.

08:10:47 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I DON'T KNOW.
I'LL CHECK WITH HER.
WE'LL PUT THAT ON THE BACK BURNER RIGHT NOW.
I WANTED TO GET A FEEL FROM COUNCIL.
08:10:54 >>BILL CARLSON:
THERE IS A DEVELOPER -- I MEAN, A PROMOTER
WHO HAS BEEN LOOKING TO BRING THAT BACK, TOO.
08:10:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
IT'S BEEN LONG, LONG TIME.
08:11:02 >>BILL CARLSON:
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE PART OF THE SAME
EFFORT OR NOT.
08:11:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ARE YOU ALL RIGHT WITH THAT, COUNCILMAN
GUDES?
08:11:07 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YEAH --
08:11:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU NEVER HEARD OF TROPICAL HEAT WAVE?
WHAT?
HOW LONG YOU BEEN IN TAMPA.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
08:11:15 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I THINK I CAN SUPPORT THAT AS LONG AS WE ALSO
SUPPORT BRINGING BACK TROPICAL HEAT WAVE THE BEER.
REALLY GOOD.
ONLY AVAILABLE DURING THAT TIME.
08:11:29 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO, IT'S NOT A MOTION.
I JUST WANTED TO GET MY FEELING OUT AND I'LL BRING IT BACK
AFTER I GET INFORMATION FOR COUNCILMAN MIRANDA NEXT
THURSDAY.

BUT I DO WANT TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO CHERYL PULLINS.
SHE'S BEEN A PILLAR IN THE COMMUNITY OVER 20 YEARS PROVIDING
COACHING, MENTORING AND LEADERSHIP FREE FOR WOMEN IN THE
TAMPA AREA.
SHE REPRESENTS THE BROWN S.T.E.M. GIRL, AN ORGANIZATION
DESIGNED TO INCREASE THE VISIBILITY OF WOMEN AND GIRLS OF
COLOR IN S.T.E.M.
SHE HAS EVEN SERVED AS A MENTOR TO A 13-YEAR-OLD WHO HAS
MADE HISTORY AS THE YOUNGEST PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES
EVER TO BE ACCEPTED INTO MEDICAL SCHOOL AND WHO HAS AT 12
BECOME THE YOUNGEST INTERN EVER FOR NASA.
MY MOTION IS TO PRESENT A COMMENTATION TO CHERYL PULLINS FOR
BEING RECOGNIZED FOR A PRESIDENTIAL LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT
AWARD WITH HER WORK WITH BROWN S.T.E.M. GIRL ORGANIZATION ON
SEPTEMBER 6, 2022, AT 9 A.M.
08:12:33 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM CHAIRMAN CITRO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:12:40 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
08:12:43 >> SO MOVE.
08:12:44 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WE'RE ADJOURNED.
THANK YOU.
[ SOUNDING GAVEL ]

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.