TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
5:01 P.M.

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.


05:02:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
GOOD EVENING.
THE CITY COUNCIL BEING HELD THIS DAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2022.
I AM JOSEPH CITRO, AND I WILL BE CHAIRING THE MEETING THIS EVENING.
ROLL CALL PLEASE.
05:02:30PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
05:02:32PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
05:02:35PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
05:02:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
05:02:37PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:02:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCIL.
05:02:41PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
THE PUBLIC AND THE CITIZENS OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH,
LISTEN AND VIEW THIS MEETING ON SPECTRUM 640, FRONTIER
CHANNEL 15 AND ON THE INTERNET AT TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM.
NOW MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN PARTICIPATE HERE AT CITY
COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD ON THE THIRD
FLOOR OR VIRTUALLY THROUGH VIDEO TELECONFERENCING AS
REFERRED TO AS COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY.
PREREGISTRATION IS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY IN A
PUBLIC HEARING ON A QUASI-JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE MATTER.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
MEETINGS VIA CMT, SCHEDULES, LINK TO REGISTRATION AND FORMS,
YOU CAN SEE TAMPA.GOV/QUASI.
NOW IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE VIA CMT AND QUASI IN JUDICIAL,
YOU NEED TO HAVE A COMMUNICATION MEDIA DEVICE WITH A CAMERA AND A
COMPUTER THAT WILL BE ABLE TO YOU SEEN ON VIDEO AND HEARD ON
AUDIO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL.
THESE SPECIFIC TWO-WAY VIDEO VIRTUAL FORMATS.
CELL PHONES AND SMARTPHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE BECAUSE WILL
NOT ALLOW YOU TO SHARE YOUR CAMERA WHILE CONNECTED.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, I WILL ASK COUNCIL TO WAIVE ITS RULE
TO ALLOW THE USE OF CM T DURING TONIGHT'S HEARING.
05:04:05PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SO MOVED.
05:04:07PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECONDED.
05:04:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
05:04:10PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
05:04:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AT THIS TIME, COUNCILMAN GUDES WILL BE A FEW MINUTES LATE.
AND COUNCILMAN VIERA WILL BE APPEARING THROUGH OUR INTERNET
ACCESS.
COUNCILMAN VIERA, ARE YOU THERE?
LET US PROCEED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ARE GOING TO BE HEARING NUMBER 1
WITH ALSO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 7 AND 16 TOGETHER.
SINCE 1 IS JUST A PUBLIC HEARING BUT THE OTHER -- I AM
SORRY, YOU ARE CORRECT.
MR. HUMANE, SOME ON UP AND LET'S DO THE AGENDA REVIEW.
05:04:49PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR, ZAIN HUSSEIN,
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
HOUSEKEEPING ITEM.
FIRST OFF IS A REQUEST A CONTINUANCE ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
9, AB-22-2209.
THEY REQUESTED CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 27.
05:05:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:05:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:05:13PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
CAN HE TELL US IF THE AGENDAS, FULL OR
NOT FULL FOR WHATEVER DATE.
BE SURE WE DON'T GIVE THEM --
05:05:21PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
THERE IS ROOM ON OCTOBER 27.
05:05:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
FINE.
SO MOVED.
05:05:27PM >> SECOND.
05:05:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION -- I WILL.
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9, FILE NUMBER AB 22-09 ON THE
CONTINUANCE ONLY.
IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE?
05:05:52PM >>CLERK:
NONE.
05:05:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
05:05:56PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:05:59PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:06:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:06:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:06:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:06:06PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
05:06:10PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
TWO ITEMS THAT ARE WITHDRAWN.
PLEASE REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA.
FIRST OFF NUMBER 14 ON THE AGENDA, REZ 22-56.
05:06:19PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOVE TO ALLOW IT WITHDRAW.
05:06:24PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SECOND.
05:06:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
05:06:29PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ALSO, PLEASE REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA NUMBER
15, REZ 22-63.
05:06:37PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOVE TO ALLOW TO WITHDRAW.
05:06:39PM >> SECOND.
05:06:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR.
05:06:45PM >> AYE.
05:06:47PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
MISNOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 18, REZ
22-80.
05:06:53PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
JUST TO BE REMOVED, RIGHT?
05:06:58PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
CORRECT.
05:06:59PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOTION TO BE REMOVED.
05:07:00PM >> SECOND.
05:07:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
05:07:10PM >> AYE.
05:07:11PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
FEW ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TO BE RELATED TO
EACH OTHER TO BE HEARD FOR CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE.
FIRST OFF NUMBER 1 ON THE AGENDA WOULD GO WITH NUMBER 16 AND
NUMBER 7.
SO THAT IS TA/CPA 22-03 IS REQUESTED TO GO WITH VAC 22-16,
AND ALSO, REZ 22-71.
05:07:38PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, MOVE TO ALLOW 1, 7 AND 16
TO GO FORWARD.
05:07:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:07:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:07:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
05:07:48PM >> AYE.
05:07:50PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ANOTHER RELATED AGENDA ITEM.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, TA/CPA 22-09 HAS BEEN RELATED TO
NUMBER 11 ON THE AGENDA, WHICH WOULD BE REZ 22-14.
05:08:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, MOVE TO ALLOW NUMBER 2 TO
GO WITH 11.
05:08:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
05:08:20PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
NUMBER 5 AND NUMBER 6, 22-10 AND REZ 22-42.
THE PLEASURE TO HAVE THEM HELD TOGETHER.
05:08:30PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOTION TO HAVE 5 AND 6 TO GO TOGETHER.
05:08:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR.
05:08:38PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
THANK YOU.
05:08:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AS I WAS SAYING EARLIER, SOME -- WE HAD TO
COMBINE A FEW, SOME ARE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SOME ARE
QUASI-JUDICIAL.
COUNSEL?
05:08:53PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUST A REMINDER THAT WHEN YOU HEAR THESE
TOGETHER, PLEASE BE REMINDED THAT THE VOTES WILL HAVE TO BE
TAKEN SEPARATELY.
AND THEY WILL BE TAKEN IN A CERTAIN ORDER.
FOR INSTANCE, LET'S SAY THE COMP PLAN WOULD BE HEARD FIRST.
BECAUSE THAT IS A LEGISLATIVE MATTER.
IT IS QUASI-JUDICIAL.
A PUBLIC POLICY MATTER AND HAS ITS OWN CRITERIA FOR YOU ABLE
TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE.
THE SECOND WOULD BE TO VACATE.
AND THE THIRD ONE WOULD BE THE REZONING.
AND AGAIN, THAT RELIES ON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN
THE RECORD.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE DIFFERENT BURDENS, I ASK THAT YOU DEFER TO
THE CRITERIA UPON WHICH YOU HAVE TO MAKE YOUR DECISIONS.
THANK YOU.
05:09:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AS I WAS SAYING, WE HAVE SOME THAT ARE
PUBLIC HEARING.
WE HAVE SOME THAT ARE QUASI-JUDICIAL.
THE QUASI-JUDICIAL HAVE TO HAVE -- ANYONE GIVING EVIDENCE OR
MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS TO BE SWORN IN.
SO AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE EVERYONE THAT IS GIVING ANY
TYPE OF EVIDENCE OR MAKING ANY TYPE OF PUBLIC COMMENT TO BE
SWORN IN.
05:10:05PM >>CLERK:
PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
[SWEARING IN]
05:10:13PM >> I DO.
05:10:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:10:16PM >>JENNIFER MALONE:
JENNIFER MALONE WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
ITEM NUMBER 1, CORRECT, TA/CPA 22-03.
05:10:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:10:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I JUST WANT -- FOR -- I WANT TO DISCLOSE
EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION.
THIS AFTERNOON, I RECEIVED -- I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS THIS ITEM
OR 7 AND 16.
THIS AFTERNOON, I RECEIVED SEVERAL E-MAILS REGARDING A VENUE
CALLED "HOUSE OF SHADOWS."
I SIMPLY RESPONDED TO THE PEOPLE TO SAY I CAN'T RESPOND TO
YOU AND I COPIED THE QUASI BOX BUT JUST TO NOTIFY THAT ALL
THE PARTIES -- THOUGH IN THE QUASI BOX LATE, I DID PUT IT IN
JUST AFTER I SAW IT THIS AFTERNOON.
IT CAME IN TODAY.
SECONDLY, THE E-MAIL'S REFERENCED THE TAMPA ARTS ALLIANCE.
I AM A FOUNDING SPONSOR AND BOARD MEMBER OF THE TAMPA ARTS
ALLIANCE.
SEVERAL E-MAILS MENTIONED TAMPA ARTS ALLIANCE.
I MADE A SHORT CALL TO THE TAMPA ARTS ALLIANCE TO SEE IF
THEY HAD ANY ADVOCACY OF REAL ESTATE ISSUES AND THEY SAID
NO.
BUT THE FACT I AM INVOLVED IN THE TAMPA ARTS ALLIANCE.
IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO CONFLICT ME OUT, THEY CAN.
BUT I WANTED TO DISCLOSE THAT.
I HAD NO SUBSTANTIVE CONVERSATION WITH ANYBODY.
I WANT TO DISCLOSE I AM INVOLVED IN THE TAMPA ARTS ALLIANCE
AND SOME FOLKS MENTIONED THAT ALTHOUGH THEY ARE NOT INVOLVED
IN IT.
IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE ME TO RECUSE MYSELF, I CAN.
OTHERWISE I DON'T SEE A CONFLICT AND I WON'T BE BIASSED IN
ANY WAY.
05:11:49PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT IS MY QUESTION TO YOU.
CAN YOU BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL IN THIS CASE?
05:11:52PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:11:53PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AND YOU DON'T SEE ANY PERCEIVED CONFLICT?
05:11:58PM >>BILL CARLSON:
NO.
05:11:59PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
VERY GOOD.
THE OTHER THING, COUNSEL, IF YOU HAD ANY VERBAL
COMMUNICATION THAT HAVE YET TO BE DISCLOSED WITH REGARD TO
WHAT YOU DID COUNCIL, MY UNDERSTANDING THAT TANYA WILCOX HAS
BEEN VERY DILIGENT TO MAKE SURE THINGS ARE UPLOADED AS SOON
AS THEY CAN.
REMIND PEOPLE THAT THERE IS A DEADLINE AND TO NOT PLEASE USE
E-MAILS TO COMMUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL DURING A PUBLIC
HEARING AND FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE ONLINE, PLEASE DO NOT
USE THE CHAT BOX TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN TO ADDRESS
TECHNICAL ISSUES.
DO NOT USE THAT TO COMMUNICATE ANY SUBSTANTIVE MATTERS
RELATED TO THE HEARINGS.
THANK YOU, AND, AGAIN, IF THERE IS ANY EX-PARTE VERBAL
COMMUNICATIONS, COUNCIL THAT YOU WISH TO DISCLOSE PRIOR TO
THE PARTICULAR HEARING, PLEASE DISCLOSE HOW IT HAPPENED AND
THE SUM AND SUBSTANCE OF THAT COMMUNICATION.
THANK YOU.
05:12:52PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, IF MR. CARLSON RECEIVED
THOSE MORE LIKELY WE HAVE TO.
BUT I HAVEN'T READ ANY E-MAILS, SO MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO
ME.
05:13:02PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I BELIEVE WE ALL RECEIVED THEM.AND FORWARDED
IT TO QUASI BOX.
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT ALL OF THEM, BUT I RECEIVED SOME.
SO I KNOW KELLY SENT SOME TO THE QUASI BOX.
05:13:17PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF I MAY --
05:13:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
05:13:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MOST OF THEM ARE ACCEPTED TO ME -- ADDRESSED
TO ME AND COPIED TO CITY COUNCIL.
THEY ARE QUASI BOX.
05:13:31PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I BELIEVE THEY ARE UPLOADED TO SIRE.
05:13:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I RECEIVED NOTICE THAT COUNCILMAN VIERA WILL
NOT BE PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY.
AS YOU CAN SEE FIVE OF US HERE.
ANY TYPE OF DECISION MADE BY THIS COUNCIL HAS TO BE UP AND
DOWN AND DONE BY FOUR VOTES.
PLEASE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:13:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WHEN THERE ARE FOUR OF US HERE, THEY ARE
ENTITLED TO SAY THEY DON'T WANT IT TO BE HEARD AND UP TO
THEM TO MAKE THAT DECISION.
WE HAVE DONE THEM BEFORE WITH FIVE AND THEN SOME OBJECTION
WITH FIVE.
SO WE HAD TO CURTAIL THOSE TO ANOTHER DATE.
IF HE IS COMING IN A FEW MINUTES, I IMAGINE WE WILL HAVE
SIX.
MAYBE TAKE THOSE THAT ARE NOT CONTROVERSIAL --
05:14:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THEY ARE ALL GOING TO BE CONTROVERSIAL.
[INAUDIBLE]
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:14:36PM >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I ASK SOMEBODY FROM LEGAL.
WE HAD CASES WHERE WE WENT THROUGH THE WHOLE CASE AND
BECAUSE OF THE NUMBERS THE APPLICANT ASKED FOR A
CONTINUANCE.
CAN LEGAL TELL US IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE THE APPLICANTS TO
MAKE THAT DECISION BEFORE WE HEAR THE CASE.
IF THEY OBJECT TO US ONLY V HAVING FIVE OR SIX PEOPLE, CAN
WE GET THEM TO COMMIT BEFORE WE HEAR IT INSTEAD OF HEARING
THE WHOLE THING AND ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE?
05:14:59PM >>CATE WELLS:
THANK YOU, CATE WELLS FOR THE RECORD.
THE REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE IS BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE A FULL
COUNCIL, I ASK THE APPLICANT TO MAKE THE REQUEST AT THE
BEGINNING AND NOT AFTER THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ENTIRE
PUBLIC HEARING AND DEBATED WHETHER THEY WANTED A DECISION
TONIGHT OR NOT.
IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO TAKE THAT UP PERHAPS NOW.
05:15:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AS PER COUNCILMAN MIRANDA'S SUGGESTION, WHY
DON'T WE HEAR -- WHY DON'T WE START WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
3 AND SEE WHO SHOWS UP FROM THERE.
THAT IS A SUGGESTION.
I CAN HEAR A MOTION, A SECOND OR NO.
05:15:41PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OR UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
05:15:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, I SAY
ITEMS THAT ARE PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
BUT ZONINGS ARE DIFFERENT.
PARTIES FROM BOTH SIDES IN THE COMP PLAN ALSO KATES CATE IF
I MAY SUGGEST, IF THERE ARE ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS
EVENING THAT WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE BECAUSE WE
DON'T HAVE A FULL COUNCIL.
PERHAPS THEY CAN LINE UP AND TAKE REQUEST INSTEAD OF HAVING
TO OPEN EACH ONE AND SEEING WHETHER OR NOT IT IS
CONTROVERSIAL.
05:16:22PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUST SO THE COUNCIL UNDERSTANDS WE RULED SO
PEOPLE A QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING, ANY PETITIONER WILL HAVE
THE RIGHT TO CONTINUE THE MATTER UNTIL THERE IS A MINIMUM OF
FIVE MEMBERS.
IF THERE IS LESS THAN A FULL COUNCIL, THEN A PETITIONER MAY
REQUEST TO CONTINUE A MATTER AND WILL NOT BE A MATTER OF
RIGHT BUT UP OF THE COUNCIL'S DISCRETION.
05:16:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:16:54PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MISS WELLS, TELL ME IF YOU DISAGREE WITH
THIS.
I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ASK PETITIONERS TO TELL US
WHETHER THEY WOULD LIKE A CONTINUANCE AND THAT WE WILL --
SINCE IT IS NOT BY RIGHT, WE WILL GRANT THE CONTINUANCE IF
THEY REQUEST IT NOW.
05:17:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SECOND.
05:17:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
AYE.
NO.
MOTION PASSES.
THEN LET US HEAR FROM THE PETITIONER -- EXCUSE ME, WITH.
05:17:43PM >> WE JUST VOTED TO ASK PEOPLE --
05:17:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY PETITIONERS WHO FEEL THEY WILL NOT HAVE
ENOUGH VOTES FOR THEIR REQUEST --
05:17:53PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THIS IS RATHER UNUSUAL.
05:17:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I DON'T WANT TO GET IN A HABIT TO TAKE A
DISCUSSION THAT WILL TAKE LONGER OF THE PROCEDURE.
05:18:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT IS NUMBERS OF
LOGIC.
IF YOU HAVE SEVEN, WHAT ARE YOUR PROBABILITIES OF GETTING
FOUR VOTES IS WHERE HE IS GETTING.
WHEN YOU HAVE FIVE, WHAT ARE THE PROBABILITIES
MATHEMATICALLY.
THAT IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT.
05:18:16PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT MAY BE TRUE.
05:18:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS UP TO THE
PETITIONERS TO LET US KNOW.
I ALWAYS IT SHALL IN THE PAST -- I AM NOT SAYING WE HAVE TO
DO IT, BUT WE OFFER THE KURTS SEE -- IF THEY WANT TO HEAR IT
WITH FIVE, WE HEAR IT WITH FIVE.
AT LEAST IT IS PUBLIC RECORD AND THEY CAN'T GO AND PLACE A
LAWSUIT.
05:18:36PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE YOU RECOGNIZE
COUNCILMAN CARLSON ON COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
THAT POLICY WITH FOUR COUNCILMEMBERS.
IF IT IS FIVE OR SIX, THEN WHAT HAPPENS IS YOU ALLOW THE
PUBLIC WHO MIGHT ALSO SHOW UP TO BE ABLE TO GIVE TESTIMONY,
THE OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT TO THAT AND COUNCIL HAS TO WEIGH
THAT WHEN IT MAKES THE DECISION.
05:19:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ONE SECOND, COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
IF SOMEBODY COMES UP HERE NOW, THEIR AGENDA ITEM IS LAST ON
THE LIST THEY SAY NO WE DON'T WANT -- WE ARE GOING TO WAIT
UNTIL WE HAVE A FULL COUNCIL.
THEY WALK OUT THE DOOR, AND COUNCILMAN GUDES WALKS IN.
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR DOING THAT?
05:19:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MY RECOMMENDATION, COUNCIL, IS THAT UNLESS
-- THESE RULES HAVE BEEN IN EXISTENCE FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
UNLESS THERE ARE FOUR COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT.
MORE THAN FOUR, LET THE HEARING CONTINUE AND THE BURDEN OF
THE PETITIONER IF THEY WANT TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE.
05:19:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I THINK I CAN SOLVE THIS, MR. CHAIRMAN.
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO ANYONE, IF WE CAN TAKE IT OUT OF
ORDER AND DO --
05:19:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NUMBER 3 FIRST.
05:19:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
AND NUMBER 4.
HAVE 15 MINUTES --
05:19:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:19:53PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
THE OTHER THING THIS -- I WANT FOLKS TO KNOW THAT -- NUMBER
1, I DON'T WANT TO HEAR AN HOUR-LONG CASE AND HAVE SOMEONE
ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE.
I WANT THE DECISION MADE NOW.
WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE.PUBLIC AND NOT FAIR FOR THEM TO SIT
THREE OR FOUR HOURS AND THEN AT THE BEGINNING OF IT THEY
FIND OUT THEY CAN'T COMMENT BECAUSE IT IS CONTINUED.
THAT IS WHY I WANTED TO DO IT NOW.
05:20:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MY SUGGESTION TO GO TO NUMBER 3 FIRST.
05:20:23PM >>BILL CARLSON:
AND NO ONE CAME FORWARD.
05:20:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3 FILE NUMBER TA/CPA
22-10.
THANK YOU.
05:20:39PM >> GOOD EVENING, EMILY PHALEN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
TA/CPA 22-10, 3204 AND 3210 WEST CYPRESS STREET.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL PLANNING
DISTRICT IN THE OAK PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS IS RIGHT HERE.
THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED BOUND BY WEST CYPRESS MEETS IN
THE NORTH AND NORTH MANTANAZ TO THE EAST AND FURTHER TO THE
EAST IS NORTH MacDILL AVENUE.
THIS WAS A PRIVATELY INITIATE 1998ED SMALL SCALE.
APPROXIMATELY 0.64 ACRES.
AND THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL-20 TO COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35.
THIS IS A PHOTO FACING EAST ALONG WEST CYPRESS STREET.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF FRAME TO THE RIGHT HERE FACING
WEST OF WEST CYPRESS STREET.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF FRAME TO THE LEFT HERE.
THE SUBJECT SITE AT 3204 AND 3210 WEST CYPRESS STREET FACING
SOUTH FACING SOUTH OF WEST CYPRESS.
AND THIS IS WEST CYPRESS AND MATANSAS AVENUE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLACK AND REPRESENTED BY THE
BROWNISH COLOR WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL-20.
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AREA THAT TO THE EAST IS RESIDENTIAL-20.
TO THE EAST IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
AND TO THE SOUTH AND NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL-10.
THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP OUTLINEDED IN BLACK
AND INDICATED BY THE PINK COLOR COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
THESE ARE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF ALLOWED DWELLING UNITS AND
MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE.
THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 12 DWELLING UNITS AND
SLIGHTLY UNDER 14,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN
THE RESIDENTIAL-20.
UNDER THE PROPOSED CMU-35, SITE CAN BE FOR 22 DWELLING
UNITS OR 55,500 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL
USES.
THE PROPOSED CMU-35 WILL INTRODUCE THE CG ZONING CATEGORY.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
IT CONSISTENT WITH MULTIPLE ASPECTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS A POLICY DIRECTION THAT PROTECTS
AN EXISTING AREA FOR NEED FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT FOR THE.
INITIALLY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO DESIGNATE
ENOUGH LAND FOR HOUSING TO MEET THE NEED AND TO CONSIDER THE
DEVELOPMENT OF MIXED USE AREA FOR LOCAL SERVING EMPLOYMENT,
COMMERCIAL USES.
THE REQUEST FOR INCREASED DENSITY AND INTENSITY WILL MEET
THIS POLICY DIRECTION WHILE BALANCING THE NEIGHBORHOOD
CHARACTER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO PROTECTS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS PROPOSED REQUEST COMPARABLE
AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD BASED ON THE
SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN.
FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
OF THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
05:24:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
ARE YOU THE PETITIONER.
YOU ARE MUTED ALSO.
>. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
05:25:07PM >> GOOD EVENING.
05:25:09PM >> WE ARE REQUESTING THIS.
STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
WE GOT A UNANIMOUS DECISION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
LASTLY, DEPENDING ON WHAT CHANGE WE END UP MAKING WHICH THE
-- MY CLIENT IS IN THE PROCESS OF DETERMINING AND WORKING
WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE NEIGHBORS TO MAKE
SURE WHAT WE COME UP WITH DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING US AND
THE INTENT TO PROVIDE OFFICE.
WE ARE NOT LOOKING TO PUT AN APARTMENT BUILDING ON THE SITE
BECAUSE IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE ONE AND TWO.
NOT WHAT THE MARKET WILL BEAR IN THAT AREA.
LASTLY WE WILL HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE COUNCIL FOR REZONING
DEPENDING ON WHAT WE END UP COMING UP WITH FOR A PLAN # SO
WITH THAT, I AM SUBJECT TO THE QUESTIONS.
JOSEPH BRICKLEMYER.
4427 WEST CYPRESS IN TAMPA.
05:26:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF -- I
MEAN, FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE, HEARING NONE, THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO
BOO LIKE TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3?
TA/CPA 22-10.
ANYBODY REGISTERED ONLINE?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:26:51PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER TA/CPA
22-10, ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040:
TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE
LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY 3204 AND 32010 WEST CYPRESS
STREET FOR RESIDENTIAL-20 TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35,
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL IN CONFLICT AND FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:27:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:27:23PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:27:27PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:27:29PM >> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY REQUEST GUDES AND VIERA BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
05:27:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, ITEM NUMBER
TA/CPA 22-11.
05:28:00PM >>SAM THOMAS:
GOOD EVENING, SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
THIS IS TA/CPA 22-11 AT 2502 AND 250 HAD.
SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT.
THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FROM RESIDENTIAL-10, RESIDENTIAL-20 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE
35 TO RESIDENTIAL-35 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
HERE IS THE SITE ON OUR GENERAL LOCATOR IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA
PLAN DISTRICTS AND RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECTS SITE, HIGHLIGHTED IN
YELLOW, OUTLINED IN RED.
BORDER BY WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE IN THE RIDGEWOOD PARK
NEIGHBORHOOD.
WITHIN THE RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD, SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
FARTHER WEST YOU GO TO THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER.
ON OTHER SIDE OF N. BOULEVARD IS TAMPA HEIGHTS AND TAMPA
HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
ONCE YOU ACROSS N. BOULEVARD, A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN -- NOT
MIXED USE, BUT MIXED USE SOUTH OF ROSS AVENUE BUT NORTH OF
ROSS AVENUE, A MIX OF HOUSING DENSITIES, MULTIFAMILY,
MULTIFAMILY DETACHED AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
THEN THE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT WHICH YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR
WITH.
THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ALONG N. BOULEVARD.
THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE FRAME.
THIS IS A LITTLE BIT FARTHER SOUTH ON N. BOULEVARD, ALSO
LOOKING NORTH.
THE INTERSECTION OF AMELIA.
SUBJECT SITE IN FRONT OF YOU ALL THE WAY UP TO WEST COLUMBUS
DRIVE.
THIS IS LOOKING WEST FROM THE SITE.
THE SITE IS BEHIND THE PHOTOGRAPHER IN THIS PICTURE.
AND THIS IS LOOKING EAST AT THE SKEET FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF
N. BOULEVARD, LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SITE WHERE THE
SINGLE-FAMILY IS NOW.
TO THE ALERT OF THE HOUSE IS WHERE -- TO THE RIGHT OF THE
HOUSE WILL BE GOING NORTH TOWARD BOULEVARD.
HERE IS A MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SITE -- THE SITE RIGHT NOW KIND OF HAS A
MIX OF LAND USES.
THE SITE IS MADE UP OF THREE PARCELS.
SPLIT BETWEEN COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 AND THE RESIDENTIAL-10.
THE SECOND PARCEL UNDER RESIDENTIAL-20.
AND THIRD PARCEL UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
AND HERE IS A PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
YOU CAN SEE THE SITE -- THE FULL PARCEL THAT FRONTS COLUMBUS
IS RECOGNIZED ENTIRELY UNDER THE CMU-35 AND THE TWO SMALLER
PARCELS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
THESE ARE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE REQUEST, CURRENTLY
UNDER THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THIS UNITS FOR 19 UNITS OR 41,000 SQUARE FEET OF
NONRESIDENTIAL USES -- RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL USES
AND POTENTIAL REQUEST UNDER THE RUSHING-35 AND CMU-35,
51,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE
FEET.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT ADDITIONAL INTENSITY AND DENSITY
AND RM-24, OFFICE PROFESSIONAL AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL
DISTRICTS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT
CONSISTENT WITH MULTIPLE ASPECTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
PROTECTS RESIDENTIAL AREAS WHILE BALANCING THE NEED FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENTS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES ENOUGH LAND TO MEET THE
NEEDS OF TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND CONSIDER MIXED USE
DISTRICT WITH LOCAL, COMMERCIAL AND EMPLOYMENT USES.
IT WILL MEET THIS POLICY DIRECTION AND PROVIDING A BALANCE
TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SEEKS TO PROTECT.
PROMOTES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
STRATEGY THAT ENCOURAGES MIXED USE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN
PROXIMITY TO IT.
TRANSIT IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SITE ALONG WEST COLUMBUS
THAT CREATES EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES.
SUBJECT SITE AT THE EDGE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT THE CORNER
OF THREE ARTERIAL AND THREE BLOCKS NORTH OF THE HEIGHTS
DEVELOPMENT.
DUE TO THE SITE'S LOCATION TO TRANSPORTATION, WILL HAVE HELP
WITH UNDERUTILIZED AND SUPPORTS WALKING AND TRANS SIT
CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT PROMOTE
AND ENCOURAGE NEW INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON UNDERUTILIZED LAND
AND PROMOTING HOUSING AUTHORITIES IN TRANSIT COORIDORS.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH
NEIGHBORHOOD BASED ON THE SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN AND
THE CHANGE WILL ALLOW THE SAME DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AS IT
CURRENTLY INTERFACES WITH N. BOULEVARD.
BASED ON THOSE FINDS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION COMMISSION
PROPOSES THAT HAD THE MAP AMENDMENT BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT COMPLETES MY PRESENTATION.
05:33:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM STAFF?
PETITIONER?
05:33:20PM >> GOOD EVENING.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ISABELLA ALBERT WITH HALFF.
HE DID A VERY GOOD JOB WITH HIS PRESENTATION, AND I'M HERE
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:33:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO SPEAK
TO THIS AGENDA ITEM 4, FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 22-11?
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
05:33:51PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:33:52PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:33:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:34:00PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED 2502 AND 2504 N. BOULEVARD FROM
RESIDENTIAL-20,R-20 TO RESIDENTIAL-10, R-10 TO
RESIDENTIAL-35, R-35, AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES PROVIDE FOR SEVERABILITY.
05:34:30PM >> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:34:34PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:34:36PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:34:37PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:34:39PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:34:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:34:41PM >> MOTION IS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES AND VIERA BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
05:34:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MISS DOCK.
05:34:52PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM 5 -- THE DESIRE TO GO TO 5 AND 6.
05:35:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGAIN WE HAVE FIVE MERE.
IF THE PETITIONER FEELS COMFORTABLE.
IF NOT, AN AB WE CAN GO TO.
05:35:15PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
I BELIEVE THEY ARE READY.
05:35:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET'S HEAR IT.
05:35:17PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 5 IS THE VACATING WHICH IS VAC 22-10.
ITEM NUMBER 6 IS THE REZONING REZ-22-42.
ASHLEY LAND HOLDINGS AND ADAM HARDEN AND BEING REPRESENTED
BY CATHERINE COYLE.
FROM RM-24 RESIDENTIAL TO PD RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
COMMERCIAL MIXED USES.
THIS ITEM WAS BEFORE YOU FOR FIRST READING ON SEPTEMBER 8.
AND WE ARE BACK TODAY.
THIS A CONTINUED ITEM.
THIS IS THE AREA UNDER THE REQUEST.
THIS IS THE AREA IN THE RED DOTTED LINE.
IT IS BOUNDED BY ARCH STREET TO THE NORTH.
THIS IS N. BOULEVARD THAT IS ON THE EAST.
THIS IS CASS STREET TO THE SOUTH.
AND MONROE STREET ACTUALLY JOGS THE WESTERN LINE.
BUT THAT IS THE AREA UNDER THIS REQUEST.
DIRECTION AT THAT HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8 WAS FOR THE
APPLICANT TO CONDUCT OUTREACH, COMMUNITY OUTREACH.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO LET THE APPLICANT COME UP AND JUST GIVE
YOU A SUMMARY OF WHAT HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED SINCE THAT TIME.
SINCE THIS REQUEST HAS AN ASSOCIATED VACATING, WE HAVE ROSS
ON THE LINE.
ROSS SAMONS IS PREPARED TO DO A PRESENTATION, IF YOU LIKE,
COMMISSION OR WE GO TO -- ARE YOU OKAY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH
THE PLANNING COMMISSION?
05:36:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET'S DO BOTH.
05:36:56PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
OKAY.
SO I CAN TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
05:37:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT'S CORRECT, YES, MA'AM.
05:37:03PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU SO MUCH, COUNCIL.
05:37:07PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN ALL THE HEARINGS
FOR ITEMS NUMBER 1--- HOW MANY DO WE HAVE, 18?
05:37:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
05:37:34PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
AS LACHONE JUST STATED HEARD AT YOUR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8
AND CONTINUED TO TONIGHT'S HEARING.
THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES TO OUR REPORT SINCE THAT HEARING.
I DO BRIEFLY JUST WANT TO GO OVER THE FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN
VILLAGE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER URBAN MIXED USE FUTURE
LANDS USE DESIGNATION.
ALLOWS 60 UNITS HER ACRE AND .
NO REVISIONS TO OUR REPORT SINCE LAST HEARING, BUT I WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, IF YOU HAVE ANY.
05:38:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
05:38:17PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, CATHERINE COYLE, 3512 NORTH
SWAUNNEE AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33603.
FIRST, WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR THE RECOMMENDATION
THAT WE GO OUT AND PERFORM THE OUTREACH WHICH WAS DONE.
WE SPENT THE LAST TWO WEEKS EXTENSIVELY REACHING OUT TO ALL
OF THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE LAST MEETING AND ADDITIONAL
PEOPLE WALKING THE STREETS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE
DEVELOPMENT AS WELL.
MR. HARDEN HAS E-MAILED THE MAJORITY OF THESE LETTERS IF I
BELIEVE IF NOT ALL, BUT I WANT TO SUBMIT 14 ADDITIONAL
LETTERS OF SUPPORT.
THOSE LETTERS INCLUDE DELPHINE JONES WHO SPOKE AT THE LAST
MEETING REPRESENTING WEST RIVERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION WHICH IS THE MOST NEARLY AFFECTED ONE WHICH IS
THE ONE.
AS WELL ADDITIONAL RESIDENTS, THREE OR FOUR OF THEM IN
THERE.
TAMPA PREP, U.T. AS BEFORE, AS WELL THE ADJACENT.
SOME OF THE ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY.
DONE AN AMAZING JOB THE LAST FEW WEEKS AND WE APPRECIATE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO GO OUT AND SPEAK WITH THE PUBLIC ON THIS.
WE ARE AVAIL WITH ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
WE AGREED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF OF THE SITE PLAN
AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
05:39:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:40:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR GOING OUT.
AND SPEAKING WITH THE PUBLIC.
I APPRECIATE THE E-MAILS THAT WE GOT, BUT I THINK IT GOES A
LONG WAY AND APPRECIATE IT.
05:40:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
MISS DOCK.
05:40:24PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I HAVE PROVIDED A REVISED REVISION SHEET TO GO INTO THE
RECORD.
SO IF YOU INCLUDE THAT INTO THE RECORD PLEASE.
05:40:45PM >>.
05:40:46PM >> ADAM HARDEN, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
I HAVE ONE THING WE WANTED TO ADD.
WE HAVE PROFFERED A CONDITION TO REQUIRE THE DEVELOPER FOR A
COPY OF EACH INCREMENTAL PLAN TO THE CAC.
AND LEGAL HAD REQUESTED THAT THAT NOT BE ACTUALLY INCLUDED
IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, BUT I WANTED TO PUT ON THE RECORD
THAT IS OUR COMMITMENT AS WE DO AT THE HEIGHTS.
THAT WHEN WE FILE A PLAN, WE WILL SEND A COPY TO THE CRA
MANAGER AND MEET WITH THE CAC TO GO THROUGH THEM.
SEND THEM A COURTESY NOTICE.
THANKS.
I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS.
05:41:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO
SPEAK TO FILE NUMBER -- AGENDA ITEM NUMBER VAC-22-10.
ARE WE HEARING FROM PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM NUMBER 6 AS WELL,
CORRECT, RILE NUMBER REZ-22-42.
AGENDA ITEMS NUMBER 5 AND 6.
WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE ONLINE.
MISS STEPHANIE POYNOR AND MR. CARLOS RAMIREZ RAISE YOUR RIGHT
HAND TO BE SWOFRN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
05:42:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LADIES FIRST, MISS POYNOR.
05:42:17PM >> I WITHDRAW ANY OBJECTIONS.
I HAVE AN ISSUE OF US APPROVING THING WITHOUT A PLAN AND
SUCH, BUT I HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. HARDEN ABOUT THAT.
AND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, I AM GOOD WITH HIS WORD BECAUSE
I BELIEVE HIM AT HIS WORD, BUT I THINK IT IS REALLY POOR
POLICY FOR THE CITY TO ALLOW THE ZONINGS AND SUCH WITHOUT
HAVING THE PLANS LAID OUT.
BUT ANYWAY, I SUPPORT THIS PROJECT.
I HAVE SPOKE WITH DEP HINE GORDON.
SHE HAS BEEN ALERTED TO THE SITUATION.
AND I KNOW THE REST OF MY FOLKS OF AGREE WITH ME ON THIS
SITUATION.
WE FEEL COMFORTABLE MOVING FORWARD AND WE APPRECIATE MR.
HARDEN REACHING OUT TO US AND HAVING A SIT-DOWN.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO COLLABORATING WITH HIM FURTHER.
05:43:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOUR COMMENTS ON BOTH AGENDA ITEMS 5 AND 6.
05:43:14PM >> YES.
05:43:14PM >> THANK YOU, MR. POYNOR.
MR. RAMIREZ.
05:43:19PM >> CARLOS RAMIREZ.
I WANT TO REPORT ON THE WEST TAMPA CAC.
MR. HARDEN DID REPORT AND IT WAS FAVORABLY RECEIVED.
I WANT TO SAY ON BEHALF OF THE NORTH HYDE PARK ALLIANCE, WE
ARE NOW IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT BASED ON THE DECISIONS IN
THE PLAN AND THE CONVERSATIONS WITH MR. HARDEN.
05:43:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENT TO
EACH OF THESE AGENDA ITEMS.
SEEING NONE.
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
CAN YOU TAKE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5, FIELZ VAC # 2-10.
05:44:09PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
ORDINANCE BEING READ FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA VACATING,
DISCONTINUING AND ABANDONING THAT ALLEYWAY AND CERTAIN PARTS
OF CYPRESS STREET, N. BOULEVARD, EDISON AVENUE RIGHTS-OF-WAY
ALL OF WHICH LOCATED OF ARCH STREET, NORTH OF LEMON STREET,
WEST OF N. BOULEVARD AND EAST OF DELAWARE AVENUE WITH THE
PLAT OF KNOWLES SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, AND RESTRENGTHSES PARTICULARLY SET
FORTH HERE IN.
PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS,
PROVIDE FOR DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS AND REPALING
CONFLICTS.
IF PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:44:56PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
05:44:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:45:00PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:45:01PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:45:04PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:45:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:45:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:45:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:45:09PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
SECOND READING OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9 A.M.
05:45:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
TAKE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6, MR. MIRANDA.
05:45:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN.
ITEM -- I DON'T SEE MY REVISION SHEET HERE.
05:45:30PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL READ THIS AND THEN
READ THE ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED.
ITEM NUMBER 6, FILE NUMBER REZ-22-42, ORDINANCE IN THE
GENERAL VICINITY OF 904 AND 1120 NORTH BOULEVARD, 909, 911,
913, AND 13002 WEST CYPRESS AND 902, 906, 912, AND 914 NORTH
EDISON AVENUE IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND SECTION 1,
ZONING DISTRICT RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RM-24,
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND
MIXED USE COMMERCIAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHAT I WILL DO IS READ THE ITEMS I JUST STATED.
IT MEANS THE DIRECTION OF THE ITEMS SET FORTH AND THE -- THE
PROPOSED REZONING COMPLIES WITH LAND USE AND HOUSING
POLICIES WHICH SEEK TO ENSURE THE ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING
FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND ENCOURAGE, PROVIDING
HOUSING THROUGH REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED
SECTIONS OF LAND.
COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 127-136,
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON-SITE PLAN PROMOTES AND
ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION,
CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOOD.
PROPOSED TO USE, PROMOTES AN EFFECTIVE LAND USE.
AS FAR AS THE WAIVERS, SUBSECTIONS 27-139-4, THE DESIGN OF
THIS PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND IN NEED OF WAIVERS.
THE REQUESTED WAIVERS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR
INJURY THE RIGHTS OF THOSE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT ARE --
SHOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
THAT'S WHERE I AM AT.
05:47:35PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:47:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:47:40PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:47:41PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:47:43PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:47:44PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:47:45PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:47:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:47:47PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30
A.M.
05:47:56PM >> THANKS FOR YOUR TIME.
05:47:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AT THIS TIME BACK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1 OPENED WITH 7 AND
16 TOGETHER.
05:48:09PM >>JENNIFER MALONE:
CHAIRMAN CITRO, I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT
FOR ITEM NUMBER 2 WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A REQUEST IF IT IS
COUNCIL'S PLEASURE.
OR I WILL PRESENT ON ITEM NUMBER 1.
COUNCIL'S PLEASURE.
05:48:24PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
JUST VERY BRIEFLY, I HAVE ONLY NEIGHBOR SUPPORT.
I HAVE EVERYTHING AND A VERY, VERY LONG DRIVE TO THE
PANHANDLE.
I SORT OF MADE THIS REQUEST BEFOREHAND.
I DON'T LIKE THE IT PUBLICLY.
I THINK WE CAN GO QUICKLY BUT IT IS TOTALLY YOUR PLEASURE.
05:48:42PM >> COUNSEL, DAVID SINGER, COUNSEL FOR ITEM NUMBER 1.
WE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH YOU INDULGING MR.
BRICKLEMYER'S REQUEST.
IF YOU SO CHOOSE.
05:48:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. BRICKLEMYER, I WAS GOING TO ASK THE
AUDIENCE PRESENT AND SEE IF THEY GAVE THUMBS UP, BUT BECAUSE
MR. SINGER -- MR. SINGER HIMSELF CAME UP, COUNCIL, IF IT IS
ALL RIGHT IF WE HEAR ITEMS NUMBER 2 AND 11 TOGETHER?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
START WITH ITEMS 2 AND 11.
05:49:19PM >> THIS IS DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
ITEM 2, TA/CPA 22-09.
MULTIPLE FOLIOS IN WEST MART AND LOCATIONAL MAP.
SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE MAP.
WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS.
WITHIN THE BALLAST POINT NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE COASTAL HIGH
AREA AND THE MacDILL FLIGHT PATH, A MILE AND A HALF NORTH OF
MacDILL.
THE AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN IN YELLOW NORTHEAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MacDILL AND WEST VERN AVENUE.
SURROUNDING PATTERN IS RESIDENTIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED TO THE NORTH.
THE NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS WELL AS TO THE
SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND SOUTHEAST IS A TOWN
HOME DEVELOPMENT.
AND TO THE NORTHEAST -- NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
MacDILL 48 ELAPP PARK.
A PHOTO LOOKING EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE FROM SOUTH MacDILL
AVENUE.
THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ALONG SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE, THE
SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF FRAME TO THE RIGHT.
THIS IS LOOKING WEST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS IS -- THIS IS THE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD
TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
LOOKING SOUTH ALONG SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE.
SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF FRAME TO THE LEFT.
THIS IS LOOKING AT THE TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
SITUATED TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ON THE EAST SIDE
OF MacDILL.
THIS IS THE -- THIS IS ANOTHER IMAGE LOOKING AT THE DETACHED
SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST OF THE SITE.
SO JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND.
A PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT.
IT IS SMALL SCALE IN SIZE.
THE TOTAL SUBJECT SITE IS 1.42 ACRES.
THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION, AND A SMALL PORTION RECOGNIZED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION.
THIS WILL HAVE THE ENTIRE SITE UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10
DESIGNATION AND DOWNPLANNING THER R-20 PORTIONS TO THE R-10.
THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
AS MENTIONED THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED
UNDER THE R-20 AND SOUTHEASTERN PORTION IS RECOGNIZIZED
UNDER THE R-10.
THE R-20 ALONG THE MacDILL CORRIDOR.
R-10 TO THE NORTHEAST AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND SOUTH IS THAT TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT WITH THE PORTION
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-20 AND THE EASTERN PORTION IS
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-10.
SOUTH OF MacDILL, WE HAVE FOLIOS UNDER THE CMU-35
DESIGNATION.
THIS GREEN LIGHT HERE RECOGNIZED OR DENOTED THE COULDESTAL
HIGH HAZARD AREA.
THE ENTIRE SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
PRESIDENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP WILL LOCATE IT UNDER R-10.
CURRENTLY UNDER THE R-20 AND R-10, THE SUBJECT SITE FOR
20 DWELLING UNITS OR OVER 29,000 SQUARE FEET OF
NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
I DO WANT TO MENTION THAT SINCE THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN
THE MacDILL AIR FORCE PATH, 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACHE PER.
AS FAR AS THE R-10.
13 DWELLING UNITS FOR 30000 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS SUBJECT TO LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE ASK AND FOUND IT
CONSISTENT WITH A NUMBER OF POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
THE REQUEST FOR THE REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY AREAS FOR
HOUSING CHOICES CONSISTENT WITH THE SECTIONS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY IN THE MacDILL
AIRPORT FLIGHT PATH.
DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLIGHT PATH -- A LYMPH 10 DWELLINGS PER
ACRE AND OUR TEN WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY
ANTICIPATED IN THAT FLIGHT PATH.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GENERALLY DIRECTS POPULATIONS AWAY
FROM THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
THIS REQUEST WOULD REMOVE UNITS FROM THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD
AREA.
AND THEN FINALLY THIS REQUEST WILL ALLOW BETTER UTILIZATION
OF THE SITE.
AND ALLOW ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SOUTH
TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE GOALS, POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL HAVE MORE COMMENTS
OR -- BE AVAILABLE FOR COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS.
05:54:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
05:54:42PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
AS WE MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
11 REZ-22-14.
THE LOCATION 6522, 6524 AND 6526 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE.
DANNY.
05:55:02PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
THE SITE, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA
PLANNING DISTRICT.
SMORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE BALLAST POINT NEIGHBORHOOD.
SKY VIEW PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY TO THE
NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE MacDILL AIRPORT FLIGHT PATH.
WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE AND WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH
HAZARD AREA.
I WILL GO OVER THIS BRIEFLY.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS SHOWN HERE.
OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
THERE IS A TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH OF --
SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THIS REQUEST IS CONTINGENT ON THE APPROVAL OF TA/CPA 22-09
WHICH I JUST PRESENTED.
IF THAT IS APPROVED, THIS ENTIRE SITE WILL BE RECOGNIZED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE EXISTING
DENSITIES.
WEST VERN AVENUE DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
CONTAIN AS DETACHED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 5.27 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF LOOKED AT THE
DENSITY EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE WEST OF MacDILL SOUTH OF
WEST AWLAVRIL AND WEST OF NAPOLEON AVENUE.
THE DENSITY OF SOUTH MacDILL 4.93 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
AND BOTH SEGMENTS ARE LESS THAN THE 50% ANTICIPATED IN THE
AREA OF THE CITY AND THE FLIGHT PATH.
THE DENSITY OF 9.77 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED
WITHIN THE MacDILL AIR FORCE BASE FLIGHT PATH AND WITHIN THE
RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO HAVE
ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK
AND STREET.
THE ENTRANCES TO UNITS 1-5 CONNECT TO THE SIDEWALK ON SOUTH
MacDILL AVENUE.
DUE TO THE EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE GRAND TREES ON THE SITE,
THE APPLICANT WAS NOT ABLE TO ORIENT ALL UNITS TO SOUTH
MacDILL AVENUE.
THUS, THE ENTRANCES TO UNIT 6-13 ARE ORIENTED INTERNALLY.
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS THAT CONNECT TO THE SIDEWALK,
ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON SOUTH MacDILL ARE TO THE INTERNAL
FACING UNITS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAVE ADDRESSED 9.2.6 TO THE BEST
OF THEIR ABILITY WHILE PRESERVING SEVERAL GRAND TREES ON THE
SITE.
THE REPORT SUPPORTS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOUSING THE
CITY'S POPULATION BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE BALLAST POINT NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTED BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING THE APPLICANT RECORD THE RESIDENTIAL-10
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE SITE DATA TABLE.
BASED ON THE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS IT CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES
OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY
QUESTIONS.
05:58:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
05:58:23PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
CASE 22-14.
I WILL FIRST GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE
PROPERTY.
YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED USES.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS AN AREA HERE OF 58,845 SQUARE FEET
OR 1.3 ACRES.
LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST VARN AVENUE.
AND SOUTH MacDILL.
THE SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH SEVERAL PROPERTIES, SEVERAL
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND COMMERCIAL USES.
I WILL COME OUT OF IT A LITTLE BIT.
DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE ZONE CN, COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD, AND RS-60.
THE CN OF A VEHICLE REPAIR AND RS-60 WITH RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS.
TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE, THE PROPERTY IS
ZONED PD.
AND ANOTHER PD AND RS-60.
THERE IS A RESIDENTIAL TOWN HOME COMMUNITY ALSO KNOWN AS
BAYSHORE PONTE TOWN HOMES.
TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY ACROSS SOUTH MacDILL, YOU WILL
HAVE RS-60 AND RM-12.
THESE PROPERTIES ZONED RM-60 WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS AND RM-12 IS DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY USES.
NOW I WILL SHARE THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THREE BUILDINGS
WITH A TOTAL OF 13 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLINGS.
THE BUILDING FACING SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE HAS A TOTAL OF FIVE
DWELLING UNITS.
THE OTHER BUILDING IS COMPRISED OF THREE DWELLING UNITS.
AND A THIRD BUILDING IS COMPRISED OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS,
EACH OF THESE FACING AN INTERNAL COURTYARD.
THE BUILDING SETBACKS ARE WEST 25 FEET, SOUTH SEVEN FEET,
NORTH SEVEN FEET, AND EAST 20 FEET.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING IS 40 FEET.
APPEAR TOTAL OF 30 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, AND 30
PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
NOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS.
FIRST WAIVER AS OF SECTION 27-284.3.1 REQUEST TO REDUCE THE
REQUIRED 50% RETENTION FOR WHAT IS ONE ACRE IN SIZE TO 42%
TREE RETENTION, 16% REDUCTION.
ALSO SECOND WAIVER 27-22.9 TO REQUEST TO ALLOW THE DOORS OF
EIGHT DWELLING UNITS TO FACE THE COURTYARD RATHER THAN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I WILL SHARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
I WILL ZOOM IN.
AS YOU SEE, THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE WEST.
THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE EAST.
THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE SOUTH.
AND THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE NORTH.
I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES YOU WILL SEE THE
SITE AS CURRENTLY IN FOR SOUTH MacDILL.
AND AS YOU GO RIGHT UP TO THE STREET AND THE SITE YOURSELF.
YOU SEE THE PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS.
AND YOU WILL SEAT STRUCTURE ON THE SITE AS IS.
I KNOW THE STRUCTURE ON THE SITE.
TO THE WEST SOUTH MacDILL.
THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ACROSS THE STREET.
MOVING NORTH, YOU WILL SEE THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES NORTH
AND SOUTH.
AND THE LAST PICTURE I TOOK WILL SEE MORE RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES TO THE SOUTH.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAS REVIEWED THE ACTIONS AND FINDS
IT CONSISTENCY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHALL IT BE COUNCIL'S OPINION TO APPROVE, APPLICANT MUST
PROVIDE CHANGES ON THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:03:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUSSEIN?
06:04:12PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
I GUESS THE OBVIOUS JOKE WOULD ASK FOR EXTRA TIME TO SPEAK.
I DON'T HAVE A LOT TO ADD.
THAT IS WAS PRETTY COMPREHENSIVE.
ON THE COMP PLAN, WE ARE REASONING FOR THAT AND KIND OF
COUNTERINTUITIVE TO SAVE GRAND TREES WHICH IS UTMOST
IMPORTANCE TO OUR NEIGHBORS.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK STAFF FOR THE CONSISTENCY FINDINGS AND
HAPPY TO MAKE THE CHANGES.
WE HAVE NEIGHBOR SUPPORT.
I THINK YOU HEARD SOME OF THEM IN THE LAST MEETING.
WE BELIEVE WE MEET THE WAIVER CRITERIA, AND THE TEAM IS
AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
WE HAVE ONE OF THOSE ADAM WOLF FLY THROUGH THINGS IF YOU
WANT TO SEE IT.
BUT JUST IF YOU WANT SEE IT.
AND WE WILL ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
06:05:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS TO THE PETITIONER?
ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2 AND 11, TA/CPA 22-09 AND 22-16.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT TO ANY ONE OF
THOSE AGENDA ITEMS?
06:05:38PM >> GOOD EVENING, DANA GORDON, 3019 NORTH ADAMS.
GOOD TO SEE YOU ALL.
MR. SHELBY, WELCOME BACK.
I AM THE PRESIDENT OF BALLAST POINT NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION, THE PRINCIPAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY MR.
NICHOLSON REACHED OUT TO US.
HE WAS PROACTIVE ASKING OUR SUPPORT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
WE LOOKED AT THE SITE PLANS AND WE DID HAVE CONCERN OF THE
TWO GRAND TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
HE WAS VERY OPEN-MINDED TO REDOING THE SITE PLAN SEVERAL
TIMES MAKE SURE WE PRESERVE THOSE TREE THAT ARE OF UPMOST
IMPORTANCE.
THE CURRENT BUILDINGS THAT ARE THERE ARE DILAPIDATED.
IT HAS BEEN ABANDONED FOR AT LEAST 10 YEARS, MAYBE MORE.
THERE HAS BEEN SOME VANDALISM ON THE PROPERTY AND WE ARE
VERY EXCITED TO HAVE HAVE THAT PROPERTY UPDATED.
AND MEETS THE DESIGN OF BALLAST POINT AND WE HAVE NO ISSUE
WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT.
06:06:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS POYNOR, I SEE YOU ON LINE.
06:06:43PM >> WE SUPPORT THIS.
CAROLANN WILL BE AS WELL.
THERE IS A POINT IN TIME WHERE THE DEVELOPER WAS TOLD THEY
WERE GOING TO MOVE SOME BUILDINGS AROUND WHICH WILL TAKE OUT
A GRAND TREE.
PETITION WORKED WITH CAROLE ANN TO IT SHALL WHICH WOULD PUT
THIS DEVELOPER BACK MONTHS OF DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTY.
AND I AM SURE IT COST THEM A LOT OF MONEY AND WE APPRECIATE
THAT.
THANK YOU.
06:07:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE FROM COUNCIL CHAMBERS WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
THIS.
06:07:13PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE, SECOND.
06:07:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:07:18PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. BRICKLEMYER, DID YOU GET ANY OFFICIAL
LETTER -- ANYTHING FROM INTERBAY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION?
06:07:26PM >> DID WE GET ANYTHING FROM INTERBAY?
I KNOW BALLAST POINT AND -- I DON'T BELIEVE WE GOT ANYTHING
FORMAL.
06:07:37PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
06:07:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:07:51PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 22-09.
ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AT 6522,
6524, AND 6526 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE FOAL GLOW 136891-40000.
FOR RESIDENTS OFR-20 AND R-10 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL,
ORDINANCE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDED AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
06:08:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES AND SECONDED BY
MIRANDA.
06:08:40PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:08:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:08:46PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
06:08:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:08:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:08:50PM >>CLERK:
SECOND READING OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M. WITH
MR. VIERA ABSENT.
06:08:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. CARLSON, TAKE ANSWERING ITEM NUMBER 11.
06:09:03PM >> REZ 22-14.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING, R, ORDINANCE
REZONING 6522, 6524, AND 6526 SOUTH MacDILL AND FOAL LOW
136391.0000 AND 136392.0000 IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA,
AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY EFFECTIVE A
DATE.
06:09:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
EXPAND ON FINDS OF FACT AND DOES THAT
INCLUDE WAIVERS?
06:09:49PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES, IT INCLUDES WAIVERS.
AND WHAT?
06:09:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A REVISION SHEET.
06:09:58PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE REVISION.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH 1.3.3 AND 1.3.4
AND LAND USE POLICIES 1.2.3 AND 2.1.#, WHICH ENCOURAGED NEW
HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE THAT
ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA FUTURE
AND PRESENT POPULATIONS.
WILL HELP MAINTAIN THE STABILITY WHILE EXPERIENCING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING CHOICES IN THE BALLAST POINT
8.14.2, 9.5.4 THROUGH 9.5.4 HAD.
CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY IN THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION
OF THE MacDILL AIR FORCE FLIGHT PATH AS 8.3.1, 8.3.4, AND
8.14.1.
ALSO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN SITE PLAN PROMOTES
AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION,
CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND
THEREFORE IS IN NEED OF A WAIVER.
THE REQUESTED WAIVER WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH
OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WILL BE
GREATLY AFFECTED.
AND THE PROTECTED GRAND OAKS.
06:11:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A SECOND BY MR. CARLSON AND SECONDED BY
MANISCALCO.
06:11:20PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:11:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
06:11:23PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:11:24PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES,.
06:11:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:11:28PM >>CLERK:
UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT.
SECOND READING OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
06:11:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
WE WILL NOW HEAR AGENDA ITEMS 1, 7 AND 16.
06:11:42PM >>JENNIFER MALONE:
JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
I WILL START WITH ITEM NUMBER 1, WHICH IS TA/CPA 22-03.
IT IS SEVEN PARCELS LOCATED WEST OF NORTH ALBANY AVENUE,
SOUTH OF 8th AND WEST OF GLEN AVENUE.
LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE NORTH HYDE
PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA CRA.
I HAVE AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FOR YOU HERE.
AS YOU CAN SEE SEVEN PARCELS BETWEEN WESTLAND, AS BEEN A
KNEE AND NORTH OF KENNEDY.
-- ALBANY AND NORTH OF KENNEDY.
EAST OF SOUTH HOWARD AVENUE.
WE HAVE A MIXTURE OF HOUSING TYPES.
TOWN HOUSE DEVELOPMENTS AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG
KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THIS IS A PRIVATELY INITIATED SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT.
ABOUT 1.04 ACRES AND THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT FOR THE
PLANNED AMENDMENT IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO URBAN MIXED
USE-60.
I HAVE SOME SITE PHOTOS.
WE HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND ANOTHER PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS ONE I AM -- I AM FACING EAST AT THE KOREAN OF WEST
NORTH 8th STREET AND NORTH ALBANY AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS
BEHIND ME AND THE TOWN HOMES LOCATED ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT
SITE AS ONE MOVES NORTH OF KENNEDY.
THIS IS WEST NORTH 8th STREET FACING WEST.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE OF THE
PHOTOGRAPH.
AS WE SEE WE HAVE SOME HOMES AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
HOMES IN THE AREA AND NORTHWEST LAND FACING SOUTH TOWARD
KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
SUBJECT SITE IS BEHIND ME FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
WE HAVE SOME COMMERCIAL USES ON EITHER SIDE OF THAT -- OF
THAT ROAD.
LIKE THE BACK END OF THESE COMMERCIAL USES.
THE DIALYSIS AND JERSEY MIKE'S.
I ALSO JUST WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR TONIGHT, THE BOUNDARY FOR
THE PLAN AMENDMENT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE BOUNDARY FOR THE
ZONING THAT YOU WILL BE REVIEWING LATER.
SO IS THE ACREAGE.
SO THIS IS THE BOUNDARY FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
AGAIN, JUST THE SEVEN PARCELS AND THEY ARE COMMUNITY MIXED
USE 35.
THE URBAN MIXED USE-60 IS TO THE SOUTH.
MORE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 TO THE NORTH, RESIDENTIAL-20 AND
RESIDENTIAL-35.
THESE ARE TOWN HOMES THAT I SHOWED ON A PICTURE A COUPLE OF
SLIDES BEFORE.
URBAN MIXED AUTO US 60 IS THE PREDOMINANT LAND USE PATTERN
ACROSS WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THE REQUEST WOULD TAKE THESE SEVEN PARCELS TO URBAN MIXED
USE-60 AND THE SAME FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WHAT IS TO
THE SOUTH AND ALONG WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THIS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO
THE NORTH PROVIDES LAND USE INTENSITY AS ONE MOVES NORTH.
THIS WOULD INCREASE THE IMPACTS OF 36 DWELLING UNITS TO 62
DWELLING UNITS AND GREATLY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO 90,000 SQUARE FEET TO
147,000 SQUARE FEET.
THIS SHOULD SAY NONRESIDENTIAL OR RESIDENTIAL.
BECAUSE YOU CAN USE THE FLOOR AREA RAY SHY YO FOR EITHER IN
THE LAND USE CATEGORIES.
IT WILL ALSO INTRODUCE THE FAR UP FROM A 2 TO A 2.35 AUNDZ
THE URBAN MIXED USE-60.
AND COMMERCIAL ZONING ON THE URBAN MIXED USE-60.
WE WEDNESDAY THIS OUT FOR REVIEW AS WE DO ALL OF OUR PLAN
AMENDMENTS.
THE CITY OF TAMPA OBJECTION.
STEPHEN BENSON WILL ANSWER THAT.
WE MADE SURE THAT THEY WERE IN THE LOOP ON -- ON THIS ONE.
THIS IS CONSISTENT.
AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLANS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES.
WE WANT TO PROVIDE ENOUGH HOUSING TO MEET TAMPA'S GROWING
POPULATION.
THE INCREASE OF DENSITY WAS CONSISTENT WITH THAT.
AND THIS COULD BE CONSIDERED AN UNDERUTILIZED LAND BEING IN
THIS AREA OF THE CITY.
WE WILL ALSO -- THE PLAN ALSO SUPPORTS INCREASE OF DENSITY
TO SUPPORT WALKING AND TRANSIT USAGE WITHIN PROXIMITY OF
EMPLOYMENT, TRANSIT AND CITY PLANNED STRATEGY.
THIS IS KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
A MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CORRIDOR.
TRANSIT ALONG THIS CORRIDOR.
WE FOUND -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT IS CONSISTENT
WITH THESE POLICIES AS WELL.
SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH
THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO
CITY STAFF TO PRESENT ON THE REZONING.
THANK YOU.
06:16:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION?
06:16:30PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES, I WANTED TO HEAR FROM MR. BENSON.
06:16:34PM >>STEPHEN BENSON:
THANK YOU, STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING.
I WANT TO PROVIDE CONTEXT TO OUR OBJECTION.
ALONG KENNEDY AND DOESN'T GO BEYOND THE ALLEY THAT RUNS
BETWEEN KENNEDY AND NORTH A, DOES NOT PENETRATE NORTH OF THE
ALLEY IN THIS AREA.
HALF MILE TO THE EAST OR THREE QUARTERS OF A MILE TO THE
WEST.
THE UMU FURTHER INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAN WHAT EXISTS NOW
AND THE BASIS OF OUR OBJECTION AND THE POLICIES WE WERE
CITING ARE RELATED TO URBAN DESIGN 4.4.6 TO RECOGNIZE THE
SIGNIFICANT DESIGN ROLE OF ALLEYS AND DEFINING THE CHARACTER
OF TRADITIONAL TAMPA NEIGHBORHOODS WITH REGARDS TO ACCESS
AND BUILDING ORIENTATION.
AS WELL AS LAND USE POLICY 9.6.4.
WHICH SEEKS TO BALANCE THE OBJECTIVE TO INCREASE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, TO ENSURE THAT
ADEQUATE HOUSING FOR TAMPA RESIDENTS IS BALANCED WITH THE
EQUALLY IMPORTANT OBJECTIVE OF ENSURING THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT
IS COMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERS.
I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU.
06:17:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:17:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO, I JUST WANTED TO HEAR.
THANK YOU.
06:17:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHO IS GOING TO PRESENT.
OKAY.
06:17:50PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
WE HAVE ROSS SAMONS ON THE LINE FOR THE VACATING, NUMBER
7, VAC 22-16.
ROSS, WOULD YOU LIKE TO PRESENT THAT CASE.
06:18:05PM >> YES, SIR.
YES, THANK YOU.
I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE CLERK SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE.
ROSS SAMONS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
FILE NUMBER 22-16.
LOCAL ACQUISITIONS LCC.
REPRESENTATIVE IS DAVID SINGER.
PROPERTY 2117 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARDS.
THE PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST IS TO VACATE ALL THE PORTION
OF THE ALLEY LYING PORTION OF WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SOUTH
OF NORTH 8th STREET, EAST OF WESTLAND AVENUE AND WEST OF
ALBANY AVENUE.
THIS ACTIONS WAS FILED WITH THE CITY ON MARCH 28, 2022.
THE APPLICANT REPRESENTS THE ENTIRE BLOCK OF WHICH THE ALLEY
IS REQUESTED TO BE VACATED.
THE REASON FOR THE ACTIONS IS DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO REZ
22-71.
THE ALLEY WAS CREATED BY SUBDIVISION PLAT..
EXISTING ALLEY WAY IS 9100 SQUARE FEET.
THE APPLICANT PROPERTIES ARE IN RED.
MULTIPLE PROPERTY OWNERS CURRENTLY.
AND THE PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST IS IN YELLOW.
AGAIN, YOU WILL SEE WEST KENNEDY TO THE SOUTH AND NORTH 8th
STREET TO THE NORTH.
THIS IS A -- AN OVERVIEW OF AT ALSO A SHEET SHOWING
PREVIOUSLY VACATED ALLEYS IN THE VICINITY AND IN BLOCK TWO
AND PORTIONS 6.
THIS IS A PORTION OF THE ALLEY WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION PLAT.
THERE IS AN IMAGE OF THE ALLEY LOOKING WEST FLORIDA ALBANY
AVENUE.
ALLEY LOOKING SOUTH FROM NORTH 8th STREET.
THE ALLEY LOOKING EAST FROM WESTLAND AVENUE.
AND THIS IS THE ALLEY LOOKING EAST FROM ALBANY.
THIS IS THE SECTION NOT TO BE VACATED.
THIS IS THE ALLEY EXTENDING WEST FROM WESTLAND AVENUE, NOT
TO BE VACATED.
THIS IS THE ALLEY LOOKING NORTH FROM NORTH 8th STREET, NOT
TO BE VACATED.
RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF OBJECTS TO THE VACATING BASED ON
RESPONSE FROM MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING.
EASEMENTS NEEDED FOR FRONTIER.
STORMWATER, SOLID WASTE, TECO, TECO PEOPLE GAS AND
WASTEWATER.
AND TREES, TREE PRESERVATION FOR DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENT
PLACED ADJACENT TO TREE.
YOU MUST MEET ALL CODES DURING ANY PERMIT.
THAT IS ALL I HAVE.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:21:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:21:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ROSS, PUT UP THE ALLEY PHOTO AGAIN THAT
WANTS TO BE VACATED.
06:21:11PM >> HERE IS THE ALLEY LOOKING WEST FROM ALBANY.
AND THEN THE ALLEY LOOKING EAST FROM WESTLAND.
06:21:26PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
NOT TO BE VACATED, CORRECT?
06:21:33PM >> WHERE THE DUMPSTER IS PRETTY MUCH WHERE THE POWER POLE
IS, THAT IS THE SECTION GOING NORTH.
SO THIS IS LOOKING EAST FROM WESTLAND.
AND, AGAIN, I CAN SHOW YOU THE IMAGE LOOKING NORTH --
LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE NORTH 8th STREET.
THIS IS A GENERAL AREA OF THE ALLEY PER PLATT.
06:21:55PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, ROSS.
06:22:01PM >> I WILL SHOW THE OVERVIEW OF THAT AGAIN HERE.
AND HERE.
06:22:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
06:22:20PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
OPENING UP ITEM NUMBER 16, CASE REZ 22-71.
THIS PROPOSE READY HE ZONING FROM CG TO RM-16 TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, RETAIL SALES,
RESTAURANTS AND PERSONAL SERVICES 2110 WEST 8th STREET.
107, 105 WESTLAND
112 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE, 108 NORTH ALBANY UNIT 1 AND 2.
2117 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
PASS IT ALONG TO DANNY.
06:22:58PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH YOUR PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
AS MENTIONED, THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICTS AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE NORTH HYDE PARK
NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD WHICH AS A TRANSIT
EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
CLOSEST TRANSITS STOP IS LOCATED EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON
KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
TO STOP SERVICE BY HART ROUTE 30.
AND THE WESTSHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND TAMPA INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT.
SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION.
AS JENNIFER MENTIONED EARLIER, THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THIS
SITE IS WHAT IS BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE PLAN 5789 -- PLAN
AMENDMENT.
THE SOUTHERN PORTION UNDER THE UM 60 FUTURE LAND USE MAP,
LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
NORTH OF KENNEDY.
8th STREET.
NONRESIDENTIAL USE ALONG KENNEDY.
AS YOU MOVE NORTH OFF THE KENNEDY CORRIDOR, YOU GET TO A
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH -- NORTH
8th STREET.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
YOU KNOW, THIS REQUEST IS CONTINGENT ON THE APPROVAL OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
IF IT IS APPROVED, THIS ENTIRE SITE WILL BE RECOGNIZED UNDER
THE UMU-60 LAND USE.
AND PARCELS TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND WEST AND
ALONG KENNEDY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE UMU-60 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION AND NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
THE SUBJECT SITE OUTSIDE OF THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE
WHICH IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE ACTIONS AND FOUND
IT CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE APPLICANT IS USING FLOOR AREA RATIO TO TERM THE
RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 239,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL AT AN OVER 2.74 F.A.R.
ALONG THE ARTERIAL ROADWAY AND HALF ACRE, CONSIDERED 2.75
WITHOUT THE NEED FOR A BONUS AGREEMENT.
AND CONSISTENT WITH THE YOU ARE SAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT
IS ANTICIPATED IN THIS PORTION OF -- THIS AREA OF THE CITY.
THE APPLICANT ADDRESSES THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES.
THE PD PROPOSES A BUILDING THAT IS PLACED CLOSE TO THE I
HAVE A JAY SENT PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITH BUILDING THAT SP
CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
WEST KENNEDY WITH RETAIL SPACES THAT LINE NORTH ALBANY AND
NORTHWEST 8th STREET WITH WALK-UP STYLE TOWN HOME UNITS
WHICH PROVIDE SENSITIVE TO AREAS NORTH AND EAST TO THE
SUBJECT SITE WHICH CONTAIN LOWER DENSITY LAND USE
CATEGORIES.
THE PD IS A BUILDING THAT IS -- THAT -- I AM SORRY.
THE PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS MANY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN POLICIES RELATED TO HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON
VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND WITH ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF
HOUSING TO MEET TAMPA'S FUTURE AND PRESENT POPULATIONS.
THE REQUEST WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL HOUSING WITHIN THE CENTRAL
TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT
CITY STRATEGY OF WALKING AND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND
AMENITIES.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THAT BETWEEN FIRST
AND SECOND READING WILL HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE ON THE SITE
AND URBAN MIXED USE DENSITY ON THE SITE DATA TABLE.
BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY
QUESTIONS.
06:27:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
06:27:18PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
FIRST OFF, I WILL SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW, THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF
THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE THE PROPERTIES HERE IN RED.
ENCOMPASSES TO THE SOUTH BY WEST KENNEDY.
TO THE WEST YOU HAVE NORTHWESTLAND AVENUE.
TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE WEST NORTH 8th STREET.
TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS FOR RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY,
RETAIL SALES, PUBLIC SERVICES.
87,354 SQUARE FEET OR TWO ACRES.
THE DEVELOPMENT AS MUCH CURRENTLY THERE WITH RESIDENTIAL AND
COMMERCIAL USES AS I WILL SHOW YOU IN THE PICTURES TO COME.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED RM-16.
THESE LOTS ARE DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES.
SHOW THE OVERHEAD VIEW.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED TO THE SOUTH ARE ZONED CG ALONG WEST
KENNEDY.
THE PROPERTIES ARE ALSO DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL USES.
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY IS
ZONED CG ALSO AND ALSO DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL USES.
AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY ARE ZONED PD
AND CG AND DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND ALSO
COMMERCIAL USES.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS FOR 235 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
ATTACHED UNITS, A RESTAURANT AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL USES.
AS YOU SEE, THIS IS -- AS I WILL SHOW YOU IN PICTURES TO
COME, THIS IS WHAT IS CURRENTLY THERE.
YOU HAVE A JERSEY MIKE'S SUB SHOP, AND NEXT TO IT, YOU HAVE
A PERSONAL SERVICES NAIL SALON RIGHT THERE.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 85 FEET OR EIGHT STORIES.
SETBACKS TO THE WEST, 10 FEET.
NORTH, 10 FEET.
EAST, 10 FEET.
AND SOUTH, 5 FEET.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE 452 PARKING SPACES AND
PROVIDING 348 PARKING SPACES.
THIS WILL NEED A WAIVER.
VEHICLE ACCESS COMES OFF OF NORTH WESTLAND AVENUE AS YOU
WILL SEE HERE.
ACCESS AND ACCESS.
I WILL NOW SHARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
FIRST OFF, YOU WILL HAVE AN AERIAL VIEW FROM THE APPLICANT.
EXISTING AND THEN PROPOSED.
FROM THE ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH, WE HAVE WEST KENNEDY.
YOU HAVE WEST KENNEDY ON THE SOUTH.
AND LOOKING -- FACING THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE EAST.
WEST KENNEDY.
AND WEST NORTH 8th STREET.
ELEVATIONS FROM THE WEST, WEST KENNEDY, NORTH 8th STREET.
ELEVATIONS FROM THE NORTH.
AND THE ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTHWEST KENNEDY.
HERE IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES, I WILL GIVE YOU
A PICTURE OF THE SIGN WITH THE JERSEY MIKE'S AND THE NAIL
SALON.
ALSO ELEVATIONS OF THE SITE.
WE HAVE THAT COMMERCIAL GENERAL
JERSEY MIKE'S, AS IS.
AND HERE LOOKING UPON WEST KENNEDY.
SO I AM LOOKING TO THE WEST.
YOU HAVE A CIRCLE K OVER THERE AND MORE RETAIL UP AND DOWN.
A VIEW FROM THE NORTH, YOU WILL HAVE THAT WEST NORTH A.
THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES TO THE NORTH.
HERE YOU ARE LOOKING NORTH TO SOUTH.
WEST KENNEDY.
AND HERE IS A VIEW WEST KENNEDY TO THE EAST.
AND YOU WILL SEE BUDDY BREW COFFEE.
YOU HAVE A CYCLING STUDIO RIGHT HERE AND MORE RETAIL ALONG
THE SIDE.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAS REVIEWED THE ACTIONS AND FUNDS
THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
NOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FIVE WAIVERS AND MAY GO OVER
THESE FAVORS VERY QUICKLY.
FIRST ONE IS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF LOADING BERTHS FROM
FOUR TO ZERO.
THE SECOND IS TO REDUCE FROM 452 SPACES TO 348, WHICH IS 23%
REDUCTION.
THIRD RUN WITH TO REQUEST TO ALLOW ACCESS TO A LOCAL STREET
GREATER THAN 100 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF KENNEDY
BOULEVARD.
AND THEN THE FOURTH IS THE REQUEST TO REMOVE ONE
NONHAZARDOUS GRAND LIVE OAK.
AND THE FIFTH IS TO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 40% TREE
RETENTION TO ZERO PERCENT FOR A NONWOODED SITE OVER ONE
ACRE.
NOW DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAS REVIEWED THE OVERALL
REQUEST AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD -- INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE COUNCIL'S DECISION TO APPROVE, THEY MUST
PROVIDE MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN AND REVISION SHEET
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
THANK YOU.
06:34:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
06:34:47PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
THANK YOU.
06:34:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PETITIONER.
06:34:54PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, DAVID SINGER, WEST KENNEDY, SUITE
100.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
WITH ME MY COLLEAGUE MATT NEWTON.
MITCH CORDAY AND ASHLEY BITNER.
MY COLLEAGUE COLIN RICE.
AND LIZ KELLER, THE FIRST HEARING SINCE SHE PASSED THE BAR.
WELCOME LIZ TO THE FLORIDA BAR.
[CLAPPING]
WE ARE DOING THREE AT ONCE AND EVERYBODY HAD A LONG DAY AND
I DON'T WANT TO DELIB THESE POINTS I AM GOING TO MAKE EVEN
THOUGH I DO BELIEVE THEY ARE IMPORTANT AND ASK YOUR
INDULGENCE FOR A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA TIME.
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I WILL GO FOR 45 MINUTES WITH 15
MINUTES EACH, BUT MAY GO 20 MINUTES.
WE WILL SEE.
I HOPE NOT.
I WILL TRY TO GO QUICKLY.
06:36:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGAIN LIKE I SPOKE TO MR. BRICKLEMYER, YOU
MIGHT WANT TO ASK THE PEOPLE.
06:36:10PM >> EVERYBODY IS GOING TO HAVE TIME TO SPEAK TONIGHT, MR.
CHAIR, IS MY THOUGHT.
WE ARE -- WE ARE A GROWING CITY.
AND WHEN WE ARE A GROWING CITY, WE HAVE SOME GROWING PAINS.
AND NOT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO BE HAPPY WITH INCREASED
DEVELOPMENT, WITH CHANGE, WITH SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
WHAT I WOULD ASK OF YOU AS I ALWAYS ASK OF YOU IS TO
EVALUATE THIS PROJECT AND THIS ACTIONS ON ITS MERITS AND
EVALUE WIT IT -- EVALUATE IT BY THE STANDARDS OF THE CODE
WHICH TO EVALUATE IT.
I AM PLEASE $TO BE HERE WITH LOCAL ACQUISITIONS TO BRING
THIS EXCITING MIXED USE PROJECT ON THE KENNEDY TRANSITS
CORRIDOR JUST BLOCKS FROM OUR URBAN CORE.
YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT WILL MARK THE CULMINATION OF MONTHS OF
PROJECT DESIGN AND REDESIGN AND VERY SIGNIFICANT COMMUNITY
OUTREACH ABOUT HOW WE CAN BRING INNOVATIVE MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT ANCHORED BY AT MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COMPONENT AT
A TIME WHEN WE NEED IT MOST.
AS STAFF MENTIONED, WE ARE REQUESTING THREE APPROVALS FROM
YOU TONIGHT.
THE FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE ONLY ON THE BLOCK'S NORTHERN
HALF.
THE SITE IS ALREADY UMU-60 IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION
AND CMU-35 IN THE NORTHERN PORTION.
ONLY TALKING OF THE NORTHERN PORTION.
THIS REQUEST WAS MADE THROUGH AN ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AS YOU HEARD, RECEIVED ACTIONS OF APPROVAL.
SECONDLY TO UTILIZE THIS PARCEL, WE NEED TO VACATE THE
INTERNAL ALLEYS AND TALK OF THAT BRIEFLY.
THIRD AND FINAL, REZONE TO A PD TO ACCOMMODATE A MIXED USE
NATURE OF THE PROJECT.
THE SITE WE ARE DISCUSS SOMETHING IN THE HEART OF THE CITY
ON KENNEDY HERE IN WHY YELLOW.
.FRONTS THE KENNEDY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL AND TRANSIT
CORRIDOR.
WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
LESS THAN A BLOCK FROM HOWARD AVENUE.
FOR ORIENTATION, THE JCC AND THE DOWNTOWN CORE.
AND THE TGH EXPANSION ON KENNEDY WHICH THE SAME REQUEST THAT
THEY ARE REQUESTING WITH THE DEPTH THAT WILL LOOK GREATER.
NORTH FROM KENNEDY IS WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING.
THE SITE OUTLINED IN YELLOW IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A
MIXED LOW DENSITY RETAIL RESTAURANT, MULTIFAMILY AND
SINGLE-FAMILY.
CONSIDERING THE LOCATION OF THIS PARCEL, THIS SITE IS
UNDERUTILIZED AND CAN BE MORE EFFECTIVELY USED.
WHERE THE HOMES ARE CMU-35 WHICH IS A MORE INTENSE USE THAN
WHAT IS SITTING THERE NOW INCLUDING RETAIL, OFFICE AND
COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
WHEN POSSIBLE LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2 CALLS FOR THESE SITES TO
BE REDEVELOPED ACCORDINGLY.
USE LIMITED LAND RESOURCES MORE EFFECTIVELY AND PURSUE A
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS MORE ECONOMICALLY SOUND BY
ENCOURAGING INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT OR UNDERUTILIZED
PARCELS.
THE FIRST STEP TO MAXIMIZE THIS SITE'S POTENTIAL IS BY AGE
SIGNING THE BLOCK A MORE EFFICIENT FUTURE LANDS USE
DESIGNATION.
TWO CURRENT, UMU-35 TO THE NORTH AND UMU 60 TO THE SOUTH.
AS BE POINTED OUT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN MAY,
PRECEDENCE FOR EXPANDING UMU-650 EXISTS KENNEDY AT MacDILL,
AND KENNEDY AND OREGON.
WE ALSO DISCUSSED WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT
EXPANDING THE UMU-60 WITH A NUMBER OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
POLICIES WHICH THEY CONCURRED.
OVER 21 LAND USE POLICIES WHICH SUGGEST THAT THIS SHOULD BE
EMBRACED AND APPROVED.
I WILL IN THE READ ALL OF THEM, BUT I WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU
FOLLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMEND TEASING AND
APPROVE THEIR REQUEST.
THAT CONCLUDES THE FUTURE LAND USE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PIECE
OF THE PRESENTATION.
LET'S MOVE TO THE VACATION PIECE OF IT.
THE NEXT STEP IN MAXIMIZING THE POTENTIAL OF THIS SITE IS TO
VACATE THESE INTERNAL ALLEYS.
IN THE LEFT, YOU CAN SEE THE AREA HASHED IN RED NEXT TO THE
AERIAL OF THE SITE.
THE NORTH-SOUTH PORTION IS CURRENTLY OVERGROWN AND NOT
PASSABLE.
HERE YOU CAN SEE THE ALLEY IN RED OVERLAYERED ON THE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
YOU CAN SEE WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THERE IS JUST NO WAY
YOU CAN KEEP THESE ALLEYS IN PLACE.
THE DEVELOPMENT WILL ACCOUNT FOR ALL THE SERVICES CURRENTLY
DEPENDENT ON THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING THE WASTE, THE
LOADING AND UTILITIES.
AND WE ARE ALREADY IN DISCUSSION ABOUT MOVING THE EASEMENT
IF NECESSARY.
ADDITIONALLY TO FACILITATE THE NONVEHICULAR TRANSPORTATION,
WE ARE PROPOSING ENHANCED SEVEN TO TEN-FOOT SIDEWALKS ALONG
THE WEST, THE NORTH AND THE EAST FRONTAGES.
FINALLY -- AND THAT CONCLUDES THE ALLEY VACATION PIECE OF
THE PRESENTATION.
LET'S MOVE TO THE REZONING.
WHICH WE ARE REQUESTING TO REZONE TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
THE NORTHERN HALF IS ZONED RM-16.
THE SOUTHERN HALF IS ALREADY ZONED CG.
THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED BY A HOST OF COMMUNITY-SERVING USES
WITH OFFICE RETAIL ACROSS THE STREET TO THE EAST AND TO THE
SOUTH.
DIALYSIS FACILITY AND VET HOSPITAL TO THE WEST.
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TO THE EAST.
AND SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TO THE NORTH.
THESE ACTIONS WERE FIRST SUBMITTED BACK IN MARCH OF THIS
YEAR.
AND AT THAT TIME, THE ACTIONS LOOKED VERY DIFFERENT.
THE ELEVATIONS AWAY FROM KENNEDY WERE FLAT.
THE SIDEWALKS WERE MORE NARROW.
THE ACCESS WAS ON THE ALBANY SIDE OPPOSED TO THE WESTLAND
SIDE.
I WANT TO YOU NOTICE THE NONDESCRIPT WALLS ON EACH IDENTIFY.
NO ELEVATION STEP DOWN FROM NORTH A.
THERE ARE NO WALK-UP UNITS AT THE TIME, THIS WAS A GOOD
PROJECT, OKAY DESIGN.
BUT AFTER INCORPORATING NEIGHBORHOOD SUGGESTIONS, THIS HAS
THE POTENTIAL TO BE A GREAT PROJECT.
THE APPLICANT TEAM HAS THOROUGHLY ENGAGED THE COMMUNITY IN
ORDER TO HEAR THE IDEAS.
MANY OF THE COMMUNITY IDEAS WERE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN
THAT IS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.
I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
LET ME TELL YOU, I HAVE NOT SEEN THIS AMOUNT OF COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT IN A MECHANICSED USE DEVELOPMENT IN MY TIME IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA.
ALMOST 2,000 PEOPLE WERE CONTACTED.
260 DOORS WERE INDIVIDUALLY KNOCKED ON.
APPEAR ROBUST E-MAIL COMMUNICATION PLAN AND AIR LOT OF MAIL
WAS SENT AS WELL.
THIS APPLICANT MET WITH THE NORTH HYDE PARK
CIVIC ASSOCIATION, THE WEST HYDE PARK, THE WEST TAMPA
CHAMBER AND WEST TAMPA CRA.
39 ADDITIONAL.
NORTH HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING WITHOUT REQUEST
OF ANYBODY ON THEIR OWN AND THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ENDORSED
BY THE NORTH HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE NORTH HYDE
PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE.
YOU ALL HAVE BEEN DOING A LOT OF LAND USE APPLICATIONS AND YOU
KNOW HOW HARD IT IS TO GET AGREEMENT FROM COMMUNITY
ORGANIZATIONS AND WE HAVE AN ENDORSEMENT OF THE HYDE PARK
AND NORTH HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE NORTH HYDE
PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE.
IN ADDITION, I HAVE OVER 40 SIGNATURES ON LETTERS OF SUPPORT
THAT I WILL PUT INTO THE RECORD.
AND WE ARE PROUD TO HAVE RECEIVED THEM; HOWEVER, WE UNDERSTAND,
AGAIN, WITH A GROWING CITY COME GROWING PAINS.
NOT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO LOVE A PROJECT.
AND THERE ARE SOME CURRENT TENANTS AT THE EXISTING BUSINESS
ON THE BLOCK HAVE EXPRESSED HESITATION.
I BELIEVE YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM THEM TONIGHT.
ONE IS THE THEATRE.
JERSEY MIKE'S HAS SOME ISSUES WITH ACT AND PARKING THAT --
WITH ACCESS AND PARKING THAT I AM HAPPY TO ADDRESS ON
REBUTTAL.
OUR FRIENDS MISS MANDEL WHO IS WITH US REMOTELY WILL TALK
ABOUT THEM.
I ABSOLUTELY WILL HAVE COMMENTS ABOUT IT.
AFTER YOU HEAR OUR COMMENTS AND THEIR COMMENTS, YOU WILL
FEEL AT EASE THIS IS THE RIGHT PROJECT AT THE RIGHT TIME, IN
THE RIGHT PLACE.
WITH THAT SAID, THE PRIMARY CONCERNS FROM THE EXTENSIVE
OUTIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE HEARD WAS.-- ONE WAS
NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRATION AND A VERY STRONG DESIRE ON THE
NORTH AND ON THE ALBANY SIDE FOR WALK-UP UNIT AND AN
ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.
SO IN RESPONSE TO THOSE CONCERNS, THE APPLICANT RECONFIGURED
THIS SITE TO INCORPORATE 11 WALK-UP UNIT ALONG NORTH A
INTERRUPTED AND ALONG ALBANY UNINTERRUPTED.
THE PARKING ACCESS WAS CHANGED TO WESTLANDS.
SO THE NORTH ALBANY FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND ACCOMMODATE
THE WALK-UP UNITS AND ACCOMMODATE A RESIDENT DOG PARK.
ADDITIONALLY WORKING WITH URBAN DESIGN, THE APPLICANT
COMMITTED TO PROVIDING SIDEWALKS UP TO TEN-FOOT WIDE TO
BETTER CIRCULATE PEDESTRIANS AROUND THE SITE.
HERE IS THE REZONING PD SITE PLAN IN A LITTLE BIT MORE
DETAIL.
YOU CAN SEE THE WRAP OF THE WALK-UP, AGAIN, TO THE NORTH AND
TO THE EAST.
YOU CAN SEE THE FIRST-FLOOR DOG PARK ON THE EAST.
YOU CAN SEE ACCESS TO THE PARKING GARAGE THAT IS TO THE
WEST.
AND THIS IS ACROSS FROM THE EXISTING VET HOSPITAL, JUST
NORTH OF THE PROPOSED COMPACTOR ACCESS.
PARALLEL PARKING ON NORTH A.
AND ACCESS TO IT THE EXISTING JERSEY MIKE'S WHICH IS PART OF
THE PROPOSED PD WILL ONLY BE FROM WESTLAND.
NOT FROM WESTLAND AND KENNEDY.
AGAIN, CREATING THAT PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ON KENNEDY WITH
THE WIDER SIDEWALKS.
A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE RESTAURANT SPACE THAT WE INTEND TO
KEEP WITH THIS PD.
AS I AM SURE YOU NOTICED, THE JERSEY MIKE'S IS PART OF IT.
REMAINING IN ITS CURRENT FORM.
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO CAREFULLY CONSTRUCT AROUND IT TO
MITIGATE ANY INCONVENIENCE TO ITS ONGOING OPERATIONS.
THIS INCLUDES GIVING THEM PARKING IN THE PARKING GARAGE,
LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS BEHIND AND GREASE TRAP
MAINTENANCE.
YOU CAN SEE ALL THAT ON THE SITE PLAN.
AND MISS MANDEL'S LETTER, CONCERN FOR PARKING AND
LOADING AND UNLOADING, GREASE TRAP AND THE ABILITY TO
INCREASE IT.
THE ANSWER IS, YES.
THE APPLICANT WANTS THIS TENANT TO SUCCEED.
WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE THERE.
AS TO THE OVERALL BUILDING ITSELF, THE APPLICANT IS TAPERING
THE BUILDING HEIGHTS ON THE NORTH TO ACCOMMODATE INTEGRATION
INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE BLUE AREAS MARKED "BUILDING BELOW" ARE STEP DOWN.
AND THE POOL COURTYARD AMENITY SPACE IS ACTUALLY ON THE
FOURTH LEVEL OF THE STRUCTURE.
AND THE AS A RESULT ARE MAXIMIZING THE HEIGHT TOWARD KENNEDY
WHERE IT BELONGS.
WITH THE NORTHERN ELEVATION FEATURING SIGNIFICANT STEP DOWNS
AND WALK-UP UNITS.
YOU WANT TO BE CAREFUL INTEGRATING OBVIOUSLY INTO THAT
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT IS JUST TO THE NORTH.
THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE COMMUNITY WAS VERY
ACTIVELY CONCERNED ABOUT WAS -- I DON'T WANT TOP LOOK AT
SOME EIGHT-STORY BLANK BRICK WALL.
IS THERE SOME DESIGN FEATURE THAT YOU CAN ACCOMMODATE SO
THAT IT IS VISUALLY INTERESTING AND ACTUALLY ALLOWS ACCESS
TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND THERE IS GOING TO BE WALK-UP UNITS ALONG WITH A MAJOR
STEP DOWN AND INTERACTION BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS
DEVELOPER.
SO YOU HAVE SEEN THESE.
THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS THAT PROVIDE AN IDEA OF WHAT THIS
LOOKS LIKE.
THE TOP ELEVATION IS FROM NORTH KENNEDY HEADED NORTH.
AND YOU ARE LOOKING ACROSS THE STREET ON TOP, THIS IS WHAT
YOU ARE LOOKING AT.
THE BOTTOM ELEVATION FROM NORTH ALBANY FACING WEST.
YOU CAN SEE THAT STEP DOWN IN HEIGHT ALONG THE NORTH.
HERE ARE THE TWO OTHER ELEVATIONS.
THE TOP IS THE NORTH WESTLAND ELEVATION FACING EAST.
YOU CAN SEE THE PARKING ACCESS THERE.
YOU CAN SEE THE LOADING AND SOUTHWEST ACCESS WHICH IS IN THE
MIDDLE, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING, THAT
EXISTING JERSEY MIKE'S IS THERE.
AND TO THE BOTTOM IS THE WEST NORTH A ELEVATION FACING
SOUTH.
NOTICE THE CUTOUT.
THE COLOR DIFFERENTIAL BUT THE TWO SIDES IS A LITTLE DARKER
BROWN AND IN THE MIDDLE A LITTLE BIT LIGHTER BROWN, AND THAT
IS THE CUTOUT.
IT IS ALMOST LIKE A CHAIR WITH TWO BIG SIDES AND ONE BOTTOM.
AS WE MENTIONED BEFORE THE COMP PLAN IDENTIFIES KENNEDY AS A
TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR AND THE SITE IS IDEALLY SITUATED
FOR TRANSIT.
THIS IS PREDICELY WHERE WE WANT -- PRECISELY WHERE WE WANT
THE HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE PROJECT.
THE SITE A QUARTER MILE FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PERIPHERY BOUNDARY.
THE PURPLE AREA IN THE SLIDE REPRESENTS A FIVE-MINUTE WALK
AND THE PINK A TEN-MINUTE WALK FROM THE SITE.
THE LOCATION IS A SHORT WALK FROM TRANSIT STOPS, DAY CARES,
RESTAURANTS, RETAIL AND CONVENIENCE SHOPPING AND BUS ROUTES
ACCESS TO HART ROUTE 30 TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA, THE AIRPORT.
IT IS CONVENIENTLY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF KENNEDY AND
ALBANY.
THIS IS THE SAME MAP USING BICYCLE TRIP GENERATION.
YOU CAN SEE A WHOLE LOT CAN BE ACCESSED ON BIKE.
MANY RESIDENTS WORKING DOWNTOWN OR THE NEW TGH EXPANSION
WORDS OFFICER OWNING A CAR IS WORTH THE COST AND WORTH THE
HASSELL, AND THIS IS NOT -- -- THE HASSLE AND NOT RHETORIC.
I MENTION THAT CAR OWNERSHIP IS DECLINING THAT THE BENEFITS
OF CAR OWNERSHIPS ARE SIMPLY OUTWEIGHED BY ITS COST.
AND REMIND YOU THAT THE FED INCREASED THE INTEREST RATE BY
ANOTHER THREE QUARTERS OF A PERCENT MAKING BORROWING FOR A
HOME OR CAR MORE EXPENSIVE.
THIS IS THE IDEAL SPACE FOR THIS DEMOGRAPHIC.
I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THIS APPLICANT HAS A TRACK RECORD
OF HIGH-QUALITY PROJECTS AROUND THE COUNTRY.
MUSIC CITY IN NASHVILLE.
TO THE CITY OF MY ALMA MATER, ANN ARBOR.
THIS GROUP HAS DONE IT BEFORE AND THIS HE DO IT THE RIGHT
WAY.
THEY LISTEN TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND COME UP
WITH A COLLABORATIVE SOLUTION TO DESIGN OF FUNCTIONAL
CONCERNS.
AND WE NEED THESE COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS TO ADDRESS NOT
ONLY DESIGN AND FUNCTIONAL ISSUES BUT ALSO OUR PROBLEM OF
HOUSING IN OUR CITY.
THE HOUSING CRISIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR
AND PUBLIC SECTOR TO WORK TOGETHER.
THE PRIVATE SECTOR WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY TO INVEST
CAPITAL TO MAXIMIZE THE UNDERUTILIZED LAND IN PARTS OF THE
CITY LIKE THE KENNEDY TRANSIT CORRIDOR AND THE PUBLIC SECTOR
WITH THE FLEXIBILITY TO MAKE THAT MAXIMUM POTENTIAL
ATTAINABLE.
SO WE HAVE FIVE WAIVER REQUESTS.
AND WE CAN ABSOLUTELY GO THROUGH THE RATIONALE BEHIND ALL OF
THEM, BUT I WILL JUST SIMPLY SAY AND READ THEM QUICKLY INTO
THE RECORD.
WE WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF LOADING
BERTHS FROM FOUR TO ZERO.
WE ARE PROVIDE TWO LOADING BERTH BUT THEY ARE COMBINED WITH
THE SOLID WASTE ACCESS SO THEY DON'T TECHNICALLY COUNT OVER
THE CODE, BUT WE HAVE TO PUT THE WAIVER TO SAY FOUR TO ZERO.
REDUCED REQUIRE PARKING 23%.
VERY INTERESTINGLY -- I COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL MANY TIMES
AND REQUESTED PARKING WAIVERS AND MET WITH ALOST OF
RESISTANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY.
WE FOUND THE OPPOSITE THIS IN CASE WHICH SURPRISED ME.
AS WE ENGAGE WITH RESIDENTS.
PEOPLE SAY CAN'T YOU CUT MORE PARK SOMETHING IN CAN'T YOU
PUT MORE RETAIL.
CAN'T YOU PUT MORE SERVICES.
CAN YOU PUT ANOTHER RESTAURANT THERE.
GET TO 30% OR 35% PARKING WAIVER.
BUT WE ARE LIMITING HERE TO 23% PCHLS WAIVER.
THE THIRD IS THE LOCAL STREET ACCESS GREATER THAN 100 FEET.
IMPORTANT FOR THE RESIDENTS TO HAVE THE UNINTERRUPTED SPACE
ON ALBANY AND MOVED THE ACCESS TO WESTLAND.
BECAUSE WE ARE KEEPING THE JERSEY MIKE'S, THE ACCESS HAD TO
BE 100 FEET BACK FROM KENNEDY AND THE GENESIS OF THAT
WAIVER.
THERE IS A ONE GRAND OAK IN THE BACK CORNER.
AND WE TRIED TO REDESIGN AROUND IT.
AND THE BUILDING WOULD HAVE BEEN A LOT TALLER AND WOULD NOT
HAVE BEEN A -- NOT A GOOD LOOK SO WE ARE REQUESTING TO
MITIGATE FOR THAT.
AN INFILL SITE.
THERE ARE SOME TREES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE THAT WE CAN'T
DEVELOP ON.
AND REQUESTING A FINAL WAIVER OF THE NONWOODED SITE OF ONE
ACRE.
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, REQUESTING ADDITIONAL
LANGUAGE THAT WE NEGOTIATED WITH URBAN DESIGN.
THIS IS A HIGH CONSTRUCTION AREA.
THERE IS A LOT OF CHANGES THAT ARE HAPPENING IN THIS AREA,
SPECIFICALLY THERE IS A KENNEDY BOULEVARD UPDATE AND
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT THAT IS GOING TO BE HAPPENING.
AND WHAT WE DON'T WANT TO DO IS PUT IN SIDEWALKS, PUT IN
TREES, AND THEN HAVE THE KENNEDY BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION COME
IN AND MAKE THEM INCOMPATIBLE AND CAUSE HEALTH PROBLEMS FOR
THEM.
SO WE HAVE WORKED WITH URBAN DESIGN FOR THE LANGUAGE IN
FRONT OF YOU TO PUT IN THE SPECIES AND THE LOCATION OF TREES
THAT THEIR AGENCY AGREES WITH.
I WILL CONCLUDE THE FIRST PART OF MY PRESENTATION BEFORE
REBUTTAL WITH A REMINDER ABOUT LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2, WHICH
IS THE USE OF LIMITED LAND REUSES MORE EFFICIENTLY TO PURSUE
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS MORE ECONOMICALLY SOUND BY
ENCOURAGING INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED
SITES.
AND THE APPLICANT HERE HAS DONE JUST THAT.
06:55:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
30 SECONDS.
06:55:28PM >> THEY WORK CLOSELY WITH THE COMMUNITY TO DEVELOP THIS
PLAN, AND WE REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THIS ACTIONS.
AND I AM SURE, AGAIN, YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE
COMMUNITY, BUT, AGAIN, I WILL REMIND YOU TO PLEASE EVALUATE
THIS PROJECT ON ITS MERITS AND BY THE STANDARDS BY WHICH THE
CODE SUGGESTS YOU EVALUATE THIS PROJECT.
THANK YOU.
06:55:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:55:49PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. SINGER, YOU -- A FEW QUICK QUESTIONS.
YOU TALK OF KEEPING JERSEY MIKE'S SEVERAL TIMES.
I DON'T THINK YOU SAID WHY.
06:55:58PM >> JERSEY MIKE'S HAS A LEASE WITH THE CURRENT OWNER OF THAT
PARCEL.
AND WHEN WE PURCHASE IT, WE ARE SUBJECT TO THAT LEASE.
06:56:08PM >>BILL CARLSON:
OKAY.
FROM THE E-MAILS THAT I MENTIONED EARLIER, AND I THINK YOU
REFERENCED IT, IT APPEARS THERE ARE SOME ARTS FACILITY THERE
AND I APOLOGIZE TO EVERYBODY -- I HAVEN'T BEEN THERE MYSELF.
IS THAT -- IS THERE ANY SPECIAL DESIGNATION OR PROTECTION
FOR EITHER ARTS USE FOR -- OR A HISTORIC BUILDING OR --
06:56:32PM >> GOOD QUESTION.
06:56:34PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YOU SAID IT WAS A THEATRE.
ANYTHING THAT IS PROTECTED ABOUT IT?
06:56:37PM >> IT IS A GOOD QUESTION, AND THERE IS NOT.
AND I WILL ALSO -- I DON'T WANT TO GET TOO FAR INTO PRIVATE
AGREEMENTS, BECAUSE I THINK THAT IS LITTLE BIT OF A
DANGEROUS TOPIC WHEN WE ARE TALKING OF REZONING, BUT THERE
IS A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CURRENT OWNER THAT EACH OF THE
BUSINESSES THAT ARE CURRENTLY THERE HAVE.
AS THE APPLICANT, WE DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY YET.
IT IS CONTINGENT.
WE CAN'T INTERACT WITH THE CURRENT BUSINESSES, WITH THE
CURRENT TENANTS, WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE OWNERS.
THE CURRENT OWNERS OF THE PROPERTIES.
AND WE HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THAT PERMISSION IN ALL CASES.
06:57:23PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ARE YOU ABLE TO SAY -- LEGAL, SHUT ME DOWN
IF I CAN'T ASK IT.
ARE YOU ABLE TO SAY YOUR INTENTION -- A BUNCH OF PEOPLE THAT
WILL COMMENT.
ANY INTENTIONAL ACCOMMODATION FOR ANY OF THEM THAT YOU CAN
--
06:57:37PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WOULD THINK THAT YOU WOULDN'T BE WISE TO
FURTHER IN THE RECORD.
THAT IS NOT RELEVANT TO YOUR DECISION BASED ON THE CRITERIA.
06:57:47PM >> I WILL AGREE WITH MR. SHELBY WHILE IT IS NOT RELEVANT TO
THAT CRITERIA.
I THINK IT IS FAIR FOR YOU TO KNOW.
I HAVE REPRESENTED DEVELOPERS AND APPLICANTS WHO WILL COME
IN AND SIMPLY SAY, THERE IS A LEASE.
THE TERMS OF THE LEASE PREVAIL.
AND WHATEVER HAPPENS, HAPPENS.
THIS IS NOT ONE OF THOSE APPLICANTS, AND I CERTAINLY CANNOT
MAKE ANY GUARANTEES OTHER THAN THIS APPLICANT IS ABSOLUTELY
OPEN TO NEGOTIATE WHAT THAT RETAIL SPACE WILL LOOK LIKE AND
WHO THE TENANTS ARE ON.THE GROUND FLOOR.
NOBODY THAT HAS SIGNED UP.
THEY ARE OPEN TO THE ARTS AND EXISTING BUSINESSES REUPPING
AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
06:58:24PM >>BILL CARLSON:
FOR THE SAKE OF FOLKS WATCHING, CAN YOU TELL
US AND MISS WELLS CAN WEIGH IN OR JUST NOD.
TELL US WHAT RIGHTS OR LACK OF RIGHTS CITY COUNCIL HAS TO
DEFINE WHO YOUR TENANTS WILL BE?
06:58:41PM >> I WILL LET CITY STAFF GIVE YOU THE BULK OF THE ANSWER,
BUT I THINK CITY COUNCIL DOES NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO GET IN
BETWEEN PRIVATE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN LANDLORDS AND TENANTS AS
MUCH AS WE WOULD ALL LIKE TO KEEP CERTAIN BUSINESSES AND NOT
KEEP CERTAIN BUSINESSES WHEN A REZONING HAPPENS, IT IS NOT
PART OF THE CRITERIA THAT YOU CAN CONSIDER.
06:59:01PM >>BILL CARLSON:
COULD YOU MAYBE EXPLAIN FOR THE -- FOR
EVERYONE ELSE.
WHAT ARE YOU ENTITLED TO DO BY RIGHT NOW.
FIRST OF ALL, YOU CAN CHANGE THE TENANTS IF YOU WANTED BUT
WHAT ARE YOU ENTITLED -- YOU ARE ENTITLED TO MAKE CHANGES TO
THE BUILDING OR PUT NEW BUILDINGS IN, RIGHT.
SORRY IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION.
06:59:22PM >> NO, IT IS A GOOD QUESTION.
06:59:24PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT YOU ARE ENTITLED TO DO BY RIGHT.
IF WE SAID NO --
06:59:28PM >> THE APPLICANT ISN'T ENTITLED TO DO ANYTHING ONCE THEY OWN
THE PROPERTY.
ONE THEY OWN THE PROPERTY, A FEW THINGS THEY CAN DO.
ONE IS ANYTHING UNDER THE CG DESIGNATION, THE CURRENT AND
THE UMU-60 ALREADY EXISTS ON KENNEDY, HIGH DENSITY,
COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING, THE APPLICANT COULD WAIT UNTIL
THE END OF THE LEASES, BECAUSE THEY TAKE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO
THE LEASES AND NOT RENEW.
AND CHANGE AND BUILD AND REDEVELOP AS LONG AS IT FITS WITHIN
THE ZONING CRITERIA THAT IS ON THE SITE.
THAT IS TRUE WITH ANY APPLICANT.
THAT IS TRUE OF ANY DEVELOPMENT.
ANYTHING THAT COMES BEFORE YOU.
AS YOU SEE HERE, IT IS COMMERCIAL GENERAL.
ONCE THEY OWN IT, THEY CAN PUT COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES ONCE
PEOPLE'S LEASES EXPIRE.
07:00:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:00:17PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
GOOD EVENING, MR. SINGER.
GOOD TO SEE YOU.
07:00:20PM >> GOOD EVENING.
GOOD TO SEE YOU SIR.
07:00:22PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
CAN YOU PUT UP THE PHOTO -- THE PICTURE OF
THE BUILDING.
YOU SAID A COUPLE OF KEY BUZZWORDS TO ME.
07:00:29PM >> YES, SIR.
07:00:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
GIVE ME THE FRONTAGE OF THE BUILDING.
I WANT THE LONG ONE.
YEAH.
07:00:42PM >> WE GOT YOU.
07:00:44PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ONE MORE.
THE MAIN ONE.
I KNOW YOU GOT IT COMING.
THE ONE WITH THE NICE DESIGN.
THE NICE -- YEAH.
THE LAST ONE.
07:00:56PM >> THIS WAS THE LAST SLIDE OF OUR PRESENTATION AND KIND OF
THE OVERALL RENDERING AND THE SAME ONE YOU SAW FROM STAFF'S
PRESENTATION.
07:01:05PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YOU MADE A COUPLE OF POINTS IN YOUR
PRESENTATION, YOU SHOWED ABOUT RENTAL CRISIS.
YOU TALKED ABOUT ATTAINABILITY.
AND YOU SAID MIXED USE.
SO FOR ME, THOSE ARE BUZZWORDS FOR ME.
AND WE GOT RETAIL AND WE HAVE HOUSING.
SO IN ALL FAIRNESS, WHEN YOU USE THOSE WORDS, ARE WE SAYING
THIS WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL LEVELS OF INCOME, THIS WHOLE
PROPERTY HERE?
OR CERTAIN MARKET RATE HERE?
07:01:33PM >> SO THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THIS
SHOULD BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, NOT AFFORDABLE HOUSE THE
APPLICANT DECIDED NOT TO ENGAGE IN THAT DISCUSSION ON THE
HOUSING COMPONENT.
ON THE RETAIL, THIS IS ACTUALLY A VERY INTERESTING PART.
AND IT WAS ALONG WITH DISCUSSIONS FROM THE COMMUNITY ABOUT
MICRO TENANTCIES.
THAT IS A BIG PART OF WHAT WE HEARD OF.
THAT WE WANT LOCAL BUSINESSES.
WE WANT SMALLER FOOTPRINTS SO THE RENTS ARE ATTAINABLE FOR
EMERGING BUSINESSES.
THIS APPLICANT IS OPEN TO THAT.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO COMMIT TO WE WILL HAVE THIS TENANT OR
THAT TENANT.
WHAT WE HEARD OF THE COMMUNITY, THAT IS OF SIGNIFICANT
INTEREST.
AND THIS APPLICANT WANTS TO BE HERE FOR A WHILE.
WANTS TO ENGAGE FOR THE COMMUNITY.
I THINK THEY HAVE PROVEN THAT.
SO WE WILL ASK FOR YOUR TRUST AND THE COMMUNITY'S TRUST THAT
THEY ARE GOING TO OPEN THEMSELVES TO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALL
LEVELS OF BESSES FROM EXISTING TO NEW TO EMERGING.
07:02:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I APPRECIATE YOU BEING ABLE TO COMMENT ON
THAT.
BUT, YOU KNOW, IN -- BUSINESSES ARE A KEY BECAUSE THAT IS A
MAJOR CORRIDOR FOR BUSINESSES.
I AM A HOUSING GUY AS WELL.
SO I HAD TO ASK THAT QUESTION.
07:02:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:02:55PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MR. SINGER, YOU MENTIONED YOU HAVE TWO LOADING BERTH.
IN THE ESSENCE THE SAME LOADING BERTH FOR SOLID WASTE, AM I
CORRECT?
07:03:05PM >> YES, SIR.
07:03:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I WOULD ASSUME AND NOT AN EXPERT ON
EITHER ONE OF THEM, BUT ASSUME THAT THE LOADING BERTH OF
SOLID WASTE HAVE THE LONG CONTAINERS IN THERE AND DUMPED IN.
07:03:17PM >> YES, SIR.
07:03:18PM >> TWO OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME.
HOW ARE YOU GOING TO LOAD AND UNLOAD?
07:03:23PM >> THERE HAS TO BE SCHEDULING AND WHAT THE DEVELOPER AND THE
APPLICANT HAS DONE IN CITY AFTER CITY, IS COORDINATE WITH
SOLID WASTE.
COORDINATE WITH PEOPLE.
07:03:33PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I UNDERSTAND THAT.
BUT HOW MANY UNITS?
200 --
07:03:39PM >> 235.
07:03:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WHATEVER IT IS, 235.
HARD FOR BOARD NIGHT WITH THEM WHAT TIME -- THE CITY IS NOT
GOING TO BE PULLING UP THE BERTH FOR TWO OR THREE TO GET IN.
I WOULD IMAGINE.
I AM NOT AGAINST THE PROJECT, I AM JUST TELLING YOU WHAT I
THINK COULD HAPPEN THAT YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A BACK-UP
PEOPLE WITH PICKUP TRUCKS OR WHATEVER TO BRING IN.
AND SAY HOW DO I GET IN.
YOU GOT TWO CONTAINERS.
07:04:04PM >> LISTEN, ABOVE MY PAY GRADE, BUT WITH ANY LARGE
DEVELOPMENT, THERE HAS TO BE COORDINATION.
07:04:14PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IN THE SECOND.
I KNOW YOU TALKED CASUALLY OF 23% IN PARKING.
YOU KNOW WE MAKE A LOT OF ASSUMPTIONS IN THE FUTURE ABOUT
PARKING.
BUT I HAVEN'T SEEN PEOPLE TURN IN KEYS TO THEIR CARS.
07:04:27PM >> I THINK WE DO MAKE ASSUMPTIONS, BUT IF YOU WOULD TALK TO
MY MEN YELLS AND THE YOUNGER -- MILLENNIALS AND THE YOUNGER
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO LIVE CLOSE TO THE URBAN CORE AND THINGS
IN WALKING DISTANCE, YOU WILL SEE THAT PEOPLE ARE GIVING UP
THEIR CARS.
AN INACT SCIENCE.
07:04:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I AM NOT GOING TO ARGUE THE POINT.
I HAVE EIGHT OF THOSE MILLENNIALS AN EIGHT OF THEM HAVE
CARS.
IN MY ERA, I HAD TEN FRIENDS AND MAYBE ONE HAD A CAR AND WE
WERE THE ORIGINAL OF -- IT IS CONFUSING BECAUSE I HEAR
THINGS IN DOWNTOWN, WE DON'T NEED THIS.
WE DON'T NEED THAT.
BUT I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYBODY DEPOSIT ANY KEYS.
I AM NOT AGAINST THE PROJECT, I AM SPEAKING OF GENERAL TERMS
OF WHAT WE SEE IN LIFE, THE REALITY OF LIFE.
07:05:17PM >> YES, SIR.
WE HAVE SEEN MANY PROJECT OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS WHO
ASK FOR PARKING WAIVERS AND RECEIVE THEM, LARGER THAN THIS.
WE ASK YOU TO CONSIDER THIS ON THE KENNEDY TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
SO MANY SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE WITHIN WALKING AND BIKING
DISTANCE.
IF THERE IS GOING TO BE A PARKING WAIVER, THIS IS THE PRIME
LOCATION TO IT.
07:05:38PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
ONE MORE THING IF I MAY -- I WOULD LIKE
TO GET A STRAIGHT ANSWER AND I WASN'T QUITE INTUNED -- THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY THAT OWNS THE JERSEY MIKE'S ALSO OWNS
PART WHERE YOU DEVELOPING.
07:05:50PM >> THE OWNER OF JERSEY MIKE'S ARE INDEPENDENT OF SOME
OTHER PARCELS.
SEVERAL PARCELS THAT HAVE BEEN ASSEMBLED TO GET TO THE
SQUARE BOX.
THE JERSEY MIKE'S IS ONE OWNER.
07:06:04PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HE IS NOT INVOLVED, THE OWNER, WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT.
I DON'T CARE OR NOT AS FAR AS A PARTNER -- THE SAME OWNER OF
THAT PROPERTY THAT OWNS SOMETHING IN THE BACK OF THAT
PROPERTY?
07:06:14PM >> I DON'T BELIEVE TO SO.
AND, YES, THE OWNER IS INVOLVED.
BY VIRTUE OF THE OWNER, THE TENANT HAS TO BE INVOLVED.
07:06:21PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I DON'T WANT TO KNOW OF THE REST OF THE
STUFF, JUST TO THE ZONING.
07:06:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:06:28PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NOW I THOUGHT I KNEW -- BUT NOW I AM
CONFUSED.
IF JERSEY MIKE'S PARTS OF THE PROJECT.
07:06:35PM >> YES.
07:06:35PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YOU OWN THE WHOLE BLOCK.
07:06:37PM >> WE WILL OWN THE WHOLE BLOCK, YES.
07:06:39PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT IS THE PART I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND
THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.
IF YOU WERE GOING TO DO IT, DO IT ALL.
I UNDERSTAND LEASES.
I ALSO KNOW THEY CAN BE BOUGHT OUT, BUT I GUESS NOT SO MUCH.
I GUESS IT DEPENDS ON THE COST.
I HAVE A CONCERN ALSO ABOUT THE LOADING BERTHS.
AND I -- I MEAN, I -- I APPRECIATE YOUR EXPLANATION.
THAT MAKES ME FEEL SOMEWHAT BETTER, BUT I THINK THOSE
INITIAL DAYS ARE GOING TO BE PRETTY TOUGH.
AND THEN MY -- MY OTHER BIG CONCERN IS THE -- THE TREE
RETENTION.
I KNOW THAT TECHNICALLY GOING FROM 40 TO ZERO MEANS -- MAKES
IT SOUNDS LIKE NO TREES.
SO IF YOU CAN EXPLAIN YOUR TREE PLAN, I WOULD APPRECIATE
THAT.
07:07:25PM >> SURE.
WE ARE GOING TO, NUMBER ONE, FOR THE GRAND TREE, MITIGATE
INTO THE FUND.
NUMBER TWO, TREE PLANTS ALL AROUND THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE
FOR THE PEDESTRIANS.
AND ANY OTHER TREES THAT ARE REMOVED, INCLUDING FROM THAT
WAIVER, WE ARE GOING TO PAY INTO THE FUND.
THERE IS JUST NOT THE ABILITY ON -- ON A DENSE BUILDING LIKE
THIS TO HAVE TREES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
THE TREE PLAN IS OUTSIDE AROUND THE SIDEWALKS.
07:07:53PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, I HEARD THE WORDS "SHADE TREE."
WHICH MEANS THOSE PALM TREES THAT YOU HAVE UP THERE IN THE
VISUAL WILL NOT BE WHAT IS THERE, BUT SHADE TREES.
07:08:04PM >> THERE WILL BE SHADE TREES, YES.
07:08:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
MR. SINGER, I AM GOING TO THE LOADING BERTH AGAIN BUT NOT
DEAL WITH SOLID WASTE.
YOU HAVE GO 230 UNITS.
GRANTED NOT EVERYBODY WILL MOVE IN AT THE SAME TIME.
SO THERE WON'T BE 230 MOVING VANS.
07:08:27PM >> CORRECT.
07:08:28PM >> EVEN ON ONE -- EVEN ON ONE DAY YOU HAVE 2% WHICH IS
SIX MOVING VANS.
THEN YOU HAVE UPS, YOU HAVE AMAZON, YOU HAVE FOOD DELIVERY
TRUCKS, YOU GOT -- DO YOU SEE MY POINT.
07:08:42PM >> I DO, SIR.
07:08:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL THESE TRUCKS.
IF YOU ARE PARKING ON KENNEDY, I GUARANTEE YOU THAT, THEY
WILL BE ON THE RESIDENTIAL MYSTERY STREETS.
THE FUNCTIONALITY OF YOUR BUILDING LOOKS GREAT, BUT WORKING
WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND -- THIS ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN AT
ODD HOURS 10:00 OR 3:00.
IT WILL HAPPEN AT NOON AND IN THE EVENING.
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, ANYWAY TO GET ONE LOADING
BERTH IN THERE FOR MOVING VANS OR SOMETHING WHERE DELIVERIES
CAN BE MADE WITHOUT INTERFERING THEIR NEIGHBORS THAT ARE
SURROUNDING THIS?
07:09:26PM >> IT IS A FAIR QUESTION.
AND I DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE APPLICANT HERE WHO
IS ON THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, AND HE IS PROBABLY BETTER
SUITEDED TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION THEN I AM.
SOME, MITCH, IF YOU COULD --
07:09:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SINGER, I AM JUST LOOKING FOR GOOD
NEIGHBORS.
07:09:42PM >> I UNDERSTAND.
07:09:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU DRIVE UP AND DOWN 7th AVENUE DURING THE
DAY --
07:09:49PM >> WHAT I AM BEING TOLD BY THE DEVELOPER AND THE APPLICANT
IS THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE IS ALSO AVAILABLE
FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING.
THIS IS AN ON-THE-FLY RESPONSE.
07:10:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM JUST ASKING -- ARE THERE ELEVATORS
WITHIN THAT AREA THAT THEY CAN -- IS THERE ACCESS TO THE
RETAIL STORES FOR THESE -- FOR THESE TRUCKS TO COME.
07:10:16PM >> THERE ARE.
07:10:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ACCESS TO THE --
07:10:20PM >> THERE ARE.
AND, AGAIN, I THINK IT WOULD BE BEST TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM
THE APPLICANT.
MITCH, IF YOU WANT TO COME UP JUST FOR A MINUTE TO TALK
ABOUT LOADING BERTHS.
07:10:29PM >> DO I NEED TO SAY MY ADDRESS.
MITCH CORDAY, 3000 LOCUST.
07:10:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
07:10:43PM >> YES, I HAVE.
TO BACK UP A LITTLE BIT.
I KNOW YOU DIDN'T WANT TO TALK OF SOUTHWEST BUT I WILL GIVE
MORE -- SOLID WASTE.
BUT I WILL GIVE YOU MORE INSIGHT.
THIS IS ACTUALLY THE TRASH ROOM.
THE TRASH WILL BE HANDLED HERE.
ALL OF THE FLOOR HAVE TRASH CHUTES.
WILL COME DOWN WHERE THERE ARE COUPLE COMPACTORS.
THIS IS A TRASH STAGING AREA.
WE WILL BRING OUR BINSS TO NOT BLOCK THE LOADING AREA.
WHEN TRASH IS COORDINATED THEY WILL BACK OUT AND PICK UP
THERE.
07:11:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU ANSWERED COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND HURTAK.
BUT STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED MINE ABOUT DELIVERIES, MOVING IN
AND OUT, THOSE TYPE OF THINGS.
07:11:28PM >> ONE THING WITH MOVING IN AND OUT.
IT IS A 12-MONTH LEASE UP PERIOD.
OBVIOUSLY, IT WILL BE STAGGERED.
YOU MENTIONED SIX PEOPLE MOVING IN ONE DAY, THAT TECHNICALLY
COULD HAPPEN AND COME UP.
BUT WE HAVE THE LOADING BERTHS.
AND THE THREE LEVELS OF PARKING.
AND THERE ARE THREE SEPARATE ELEVATORS CONNECTED TO THE
GARAGE.
SO PEOPLE COULD COME IN.
GO UP TO FLOORS ONE, TWO, THREE, CLOSER TO THEIR UNIT AND
BRING IN -- PARK CLOSE TO AN ELEVATOR AND UNLOAD FROM THERE.
07:11:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I TONIGHT MEAN TO GIVE EVIDENCE, BUT CERTAIN
HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS TO GARAGES.
AND YOU CAN'T GET A MOVING VAN IN A GARAGE.
SO YOU HAVE TO LOAD AND UNLOAD ON THE STREET.
I AM NOT GIVING EVIDENCE, BUT THAT HAS TYPICALLY HAPPENS
BEFORE.
MY QUESTION IS, WHY CAN'T THERE BE A LOADING BERTH TO
ALLEVIATE ALL THESE TRUCKS THAT MAY BE ON YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD
STREETS?
07:12:28PM >> COUNCILMAN, YOUR POINT IS WELL TAKEN.
I THINK BEFORE FIRST AND SECOND READING WE SHOULD TAKE A
HARD LOOK AT THAT.
WE WILL ASK YOU FOR YOUR INDULGENCE AND COME BACK AT SECOND
READING WITH A ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION.
07:12:41PM >> MISS WELLS, YOU ARE GETTING UP, YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING?
07:12:46PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF I CAN, MR. SINGER.
IF A LOADING BERTH HAD TO BE IN THERE FOR FIRST AND SECOND
READING, IF CAME BACK FOR SECOND READING AND -- IT WOULD
HAVE TO BE A SITE PLAN CHANGE, IS THAT CORRECT?
07:12:59PM >> IT WOULD BE A MINIMAL SITE PLAN CHANGE, BUT WOULD BE A
CHANGE TO -- IT WOULD BE AN ADDITION OF A LOADING BERTH.
07:13:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I WONDER -- YOU WILL HAVE THE ANSWER AT
SECOND READING AND MAKE THE DETERMINATION WHAT HAPPENS THEN.
07:13:15PM >> CORRECT.
07:13:17PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
UNDERSTOOD.
07:13:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
SEEING NONE.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS -- EXCUSE ME, MR. HUSSEIN.
07:13:29PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
GOING BACK TO YOUR GREAT POINT ABOUT THE LOADING BERTH.
AND IF IT ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING WILL TAKE
MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS TO LOOK AT OVER AGAIN.
YOU WILL HAVE MORE THAN TWO DEPARTMENTS LOOKING AT THAT ONE
SUBJECT AND ADDITION.
07:13:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SINGER, I SEE YOUR SHAKING YOUR HEAD
YES.
I SEE MR. HUSSEIN.
A MYRIAD OF LEGAL AND TRANSPORTATION.
USUALLY SECOND READING COMES A COUPLE OF WEEKS AFTER FIRST
READING; HOWEVER, I AM ASKING FOR THIS TO BE LOOKED AT.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NEXT OPTION IS.
AND I THINK THE NEXT OPTION IS, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO
BETWEEN AND FIRST AND SECOND READING BE ABLE TO GIVE A
DESIGN WHICH MAY GIVE THEM A COUPLE MORE WEEKS TO LOOK AT,
OR ARE WANTING TO GO STRICTLY AS IT NOW.
07:14:30PM >> GIVE ME ONE MINUTE TOP CONFER WITH MY CLIENT.
07:14:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM NOT TRYING TO DO ANYTHING AND DESIGN BY
THE DAIS, BUT JUST GIVING OPTIONS HERE.
THEN THAT IS FINE.
I TELL WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO.
NOT MY CONCERN.
I AM JUST CHAIR LEADING THIS MEETING.
THAT IS MY QUESTION.
WE WILL LET IT GO THERE.
HANG ON.
HANG ON.
WE WILL LET IT GO THERE.
I AM ONLY ONE VOTE.
SO PUBLIC COMMENT AT THIS TIME.
LEGAL IS OVER HERE.
HIT ME.
07:15:18PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
I WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL THREE APPLICATIONS THAT YOU ARE
HEARING PUBLIC COMMENT ON.
THE FIRST ONE -- I KNOW WE ARE A LITTLE FOCUSED ON THE
REZONING NOW, BUT THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU -- THE
CAMP PLAN AMENDMENT ARE MAJOR POLICY DECISIONS.
ALTHOUGH WE ARE FOCUS OFTEN THE MINUTIA FOR THIS PARTICULAR
APPLICANT AND PROPOSAL, COUNCIL NEEDS TO KEEP IN MIND THAT
IF YOU APPROVE -- THE CONSIDERATION OF THE COMP PLAN
APPROVING THE LEVEL OF DENSITY AND INTENSITY WITH
SPECIFICITIES OF THE PROJECT.
SO I WANT TO REMIND YOU WITHOUT BONUS, THIS CAMP PLAN
AMENDMENT -- COMP PLAN AMENDMENT WILL BE 2.75.
AND THIS PROJECT IS AT 2.74 F.A.R. WITH THE REZONING.
07:16:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
EVERYBODY, THANK YOU FOR INDULGING ME AND MY
CONCERNS.
PUBLIC COMMENT.
GO AHEAD, SIR.
PLEASE STATE IF YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN, BECAUSE WE SAW SOME
OTHER PEOPLE COME IN.
07:16:20PM >> YES, SIR, JOSE GOMEZ.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
2101 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
I AM THE PROPRIETOR FOR HOUSE OF SHADOWS GALLERY.
I WOULD LIKE TO APOLOGIZE FOR ALL THE LAST-MINUTE E-MAILS.
WE OURSELVES JUST LEARNED ABOUT THIS HEARING 24 HOURS AGO.
I KNOW THAT MAY BE SURPRISING BUT JUST AS SURPRISING TO US
THAT ZAIN, AS A WONDERFUL JOB THAT HE DID, NO PICTURES WERE
REPRESENTED OF OUR GALLERY STOREFRONT OR ANY OF THE OTHER
VENDORS OTHER THAN JERSEY MIKE'S.
WE MOVED IN ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
WE OPENED OUR GALLERY JUST AS THE VACCINES WERE RELEASED.
WE HAVE RUN ART SHOWS IN THE LAST SEVEN TO EIGHT YEARS ALL
OVER TAMPA BAY, AND WE WANTED TO CREATE A SPACE FOR ARTISTS
TO HAVE.
IN THE WAKE OF WHAT WAS A VERY SLOW UPTURN FOR SPACES.
SINCE THEN WE FEATURED OVER 200 ARTISTS, 1500 WORKS.
THE SPACE IS FAR FROM UNDERUTILIZED.
WE PACK THE SPACE WITH 300 TO 1,000 VISITORS JUST AT AN
OPENING NIGHT IN OUR SPACE.
THE PARKING -- THE REASON WHY THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTS MORE
PARKING BECAUSE THE CURRENT PARKING IS INADEQUATE.
THEY HAVE BEEN THERE FOR YEARS.
AND GO TO OUR SPACE AT 12:00, YOU WON'T FIND A PARKING SPACE
ON THE STREET OR ANY OF THE LOTS BECAUSE WE ARE USING IT.
OUR CLIENTS UTILIZE IT.
OUR EVENTS UTILIZE THE SPACE.
AND WE ARE CERTAINLY UTILIZING THAT SPACE STATION.
AND WE CONTINUE TO GROW.
WE ARE FAR FROM BEING UNDERUTILIZED.
THE FURTHER POINT FOR US IN CASE NOBODY ENDS THAT OUR LEASE
ENDS JANUARY -- JANUARY OF 2024 WITH AN OPTION TO EXTEND FOR
ANOTHER THREE YEARS AT THE CURRENT RATE.
OPINION WE ARE ONE OF THOSE LONG-TERM LEASERS.
PROBLEM IS, THERE IS A CLAUSE IN OUR LEASE THAT WAS
SPECIFICALLY PLACED THERE FOR A DEAL LIKE THIS THAT STATES
THAT WHEN PERMIT IS SOUGHT FOR DEMOLISHING OF THE UNIT, WE
HAVE 120 DAYS TO VACATE.
REGARDLESS OF THE OPTIONS, REGARDLESS OF THE LEASE ITSELF.
WE ARE FOUR MONTHS AT ANY GIVEN TIME LOSING A SPACE WE HAVE
PUT UP OVER $100,000 INTO WITH FOUR MONTHS' NOTICE FOR US TO
FIND ANOTHER SPACE, A SPACE THAT HAS BECOME THE BEST ART
GALLERY IN ALL OF TAMPA.
IN FACT NO ART GALLERY LIKE OURS ANYWHERE IN TAMPA.
WE ARE MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR HELPING TO BUILD THIS CITY'S
ART INFRASTRUCTURE, SUPPORT FOR ARTISTS AND SUPPORT FOR THE
THINGS THAT THEY DO.
WE WEREN'T NOTIFIED OF TODAY.
NOBODY KNOCKED ON OUR DOOR IN SPITE OF THE COMMUNITY
OUTREACH THAT WAS DONE.
NO ONE CALLED US.
WE RECEIVED NO LETTERS.
THE NOTICE -- THE NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING, THE SEEN WAS
PLACED ON THE BACK ALLEY THAT YOU SAW THERE IN THE PICTURES.
IT WASN'T PLACED ON THE BUILDING ITSELF.
NO OFFERS FOR INTEGRATION OF OUR BUSINESS WITH THIS PLAN.
WE WERE FORCED TO ABANDON THE AB SPECIAL USE THAT ZAIN
HIMSELF WAS HELPING US PAUSE OF THIS ISSUE.
WE UNDERSTAND PROFIT AND HOUSING NEEDS AND ALL THAT, BUT
WHAT WE ACTUALLY NEED IS A WRITTEN CLEAR AND BINDING PLAN OF
INTENTIONS, REASONABLE ACCURATE TIMELINES, COOPERATION AND
ASSIST NANCE TRANSITION IF THAT IS THE INTENTION.
WE ARE REQUESTING ALSO THAT THE CITY RECOMMEND RESOURCES FOR
THE PRESERVATION OF OUR GALLERY AMDZ POWER STORAGE AS WELL,
TWO VERY POWERFUL ART SOURCES IN THE CITY.
THANK YOU.
07:19:54PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:19:56PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. CHAIRMAN, I DON'T KNOW IT IS APROP I
CAN'T THE FOR ME OR LEGAL TO OWE WINE ON APPROPRIATE FOR ME
OR LEGAL TO OPINE ON THIS, BUT QUITE FRANKLY THAT IS OUTSIDE
COUNTY SCOPE.
07:20:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I AM NOT A LAWYER, BUT I WAS GOING TO SAY
THAT.
07:20:13PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU HAVE THREE DIFFERENT REQUESTS HERE
BECAUSE YOU DECIDED TO ALLOW TO COMBINE THESE PROJECTS,
THESE ACTIONS INTO ONE PRESENTATION.
THE FIRST QUESTION THAT YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO VOTE ON
WOULD BE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE.
AND THIS IS WHETHER IT IS APROP YANT THAT THE DENSITY THAT
-- APPROPRIATE THAT THE DENSITY THAT IS PLACED IN THAT
CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS ACCEPTABLE TO BE INCREASED AND
IS THE CRITERIA THAT SUPPORTS THAT BASIS FOR DOING THAT.
THE SECOND ONE IS THE VACATION AND IF YOU NEED TO HAVE THAT
CRITERIA.
RON WIGGINTON IS HERE TO EXPLAIN THAT AND DO THAT FOR YOU.
THE THIRD ONE IS THE REZONING AND THAT IS THE COMPATIBILITY
WITH WHAT IS EXISTING AND THE OTHER CRITERIA IN YOUR STAFFER
REPORT.
EACH OF THE STAFF REPORTS ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE EACH ONE OF
THEM HAS DIFFERENT CRITERIA.
WITH REGARDS TO RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PRESENTS LANDLORDS AND
PRESENT TENANTS, THAT IS OUTSIDE THE COPE OF WHAT YOU AS A
LAND USE BOARD ARE PERMITTED TO DO.
AND I WOULD ADVISE AGAINST MAKING THAT A BASIS FOR CRITERIA.
IF YOU WERE TO DENY SOMETHING ON THE BASIS FOR A PRIVATE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN A LANDLORD AND THE TENANT, THAT WOULD BE A
BASIS FOR -- FOR CERTAINLY A REVIEW BY A COURT.
SO MY ADVICE TO YOU, COUNCIL, AND IF LEGAL WANTS TO ADD
ANYTHING TO WHAT I SAID, I WOULD APPRECIATES THAT, BUT
SERIOUSLY THE CONCERNS OF THE SPEAKERS WHO DISCUSS THIS
CERTAINLY ARE HEARTFELT AND CERTAINLY SIGNIFICANT TO THEM,
BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU ARE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR AND
REQUIRED TO DO, IT IS OUTSIDE OF YOUR PURSUE.
OPINION.
07:22:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:22:08PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, I WAS GOING TO
MENTION THAT IN MY OPINION, AND I AM NOT A LAWYER, THE CITY
OF TAMPA IS NOT PART OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN A LANDLORD AND
THE PROPERTY THAT WAS LEASED TO THE -- TO THE TENANT.
SO, THEREFORE, WE ARE NOT PART OF THAT OPERATION.
WE SHOULD NOT GET INVOLVED IN THAT.
THAT IS UP TO THE NEGOTIATION OF GOT PARTIES CAME TOGETHER
FOR SOME REASON AND LEASED AN OPERATION UNDER THOSE
CONDITIONS.
CITY OF TAMPA WAS NOT INVOLVED, THEREFORE WE CAN'T GET
INVOLVED.
07:22:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:22:41PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ASKING MR. SHELBY.
GIVEN NOTICE AND PROPERTY OWNER, ANYTHING THAT THE NOTICE
SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE TENANT OR NOT.
07:22:51PM >> TENANT DO NOT GET NOTICE -- I DON'T WANT TO TESTIFY TO
THAT.
THAT IS A QUESTION FOR MR. HUSSEIN.
MORE APPROPRIATE FOR YOU TO ASK THAT QUESTION OF STAFF SO
THEY CAN TESTIFY TO THAT.
07:23:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HE IS IN CONFERENCE NOW.
07:23:05PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
HE IS, WITH TRANSPORTATION.
DID YOU WANT TOP SPEAK -- THIS IS NOT A TRANSPORTATION
QUESTION, BUT -- BUT A QUESTION THAT COUNCILMAN MIRANDA
STATED.
AS A RESULT OF TESTIMONY THAT HE HEARD, MR. MIRANDA, DID YOU
WANT TO REPEAT THAT --
07:23:22PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I AM SAYING THE CITY WAS NOT INVOLVED IN
THE ACTUAL CONTRACT OR LEASING THE OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN
THE OWNER AND THE TENANT.
A LEASE DONE SEPARATELY WITHOUT CITY, AND SHOULDN'T COME US
TO FOR EVERYTHING.
07:23:34PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE QUESTION WAS IF TENANTS --
07:23:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I ASKED THE QUESTION -- THE QUESTION
WAS, ZAIN, IN GIVING NOTICE, IS THE NOTICE ONLY GIVEN TO THE
PROPERTY OWNER OR THE PROPERTY OWNER -- IN OUR CODE, WHEN
THE PROPERTY OWNER IF HE HAS TO GIVE NOTICE TO THE TENANT.
07:23:55PM >> I MAY RESPOND, CHAPTER 27 REQUIRES NOTICE TO GO TO
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE SITE.
IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO GO TO TENANTS.
ONE OF THE CHALLENGES WITH THAT CONCEPT IS THERE IS NO
OBJECTIVE WAY FOR THE CITY TO DETERMINE WHO THE TENANTS ARE
AT ANY POINT IN TIME.
TENANTS CHANGE.
WHEREAS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS, WE ASK THE APPLICANT TO
GET THAT INFORMATION FROM THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PROPERTY
APPRAISER'S WEB SITE.
SO THE TENANTS ARE NOT.
I DID LOOK AT THE AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE NOTICE
REQUIREMENTS FILED BY THE APPLICANT.
AND ONE GENTLEMAN MENTIONED THERE WAS ONLY ONE SIGN ON THE
ALLEY.
THE AFFIDAVIT INCLUDED NUMEROUS PHOTOGRAPHS OF SIGNS
THROUGHOUT WHAT APPEARED TO BE THROUGHOUT THE BLOCK.
SO WHILE TENANTS MAY NOT RECEIVE WRITTEN NOTICE, SIGNS ARE
POSTED AROUND THE PROPERTY.
AND THE SIGNS INCLUDED BOTH OF REZONING AND THE VACATING
PETITION.
AND I ASSUME THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
07:24:54PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, MISS WELLS.
07:24:56PM >>CATE WELLS:
THANK YOU.
07:24:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:25:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
MISS WELLS, WHILE I UNDERSTAND THE PROPERTY
OWNERS THE ONES THAT RECEIVE THE NOTICE, I DON'T AGREE THAT
WE CAN'T FINDS THE TENANTS, BECAUSE WE HAVE THEIR ADDRESS.
07:25:14PM >>CATE WELLS:
A GREAT CONVERSATION FOR ANOTHER DAY.
07:25:16PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT'S WHAT I AM SAYING.
WE COULDN'T -- WE CAN DISCUSS THAT ANOTHER TIME.
07:25:21PM >>CATE WELLS:
THANK YOU.
07:25:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET'S CONTINUE WITH PUBLIC COMMENT.
07:25:28PM >> COUNCILMEMBERS, WESLEY WISENBERGER.
I LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR 32 YEARS AT 1919 WEST
NORTH A.
I HAVE SEEN A CHANGE.
I HAVE -- AND WE ACCEPT CHANGE EVERY DAY.
THIS 2117 WEST KENNEDY, WE HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH
THIS COMPANY MANY TIMES.
THEY HAVE CALLED.
THEY HAVE CHATTED.
THEY HAVE SHARED.
WE HAVE SEEN EVERY SCHEMATIC THEY HAD.
WE ARE PLEASED WITH IT.
WE THINK IT LOOKS GORGEOUS.
THE LOCATION.
IT IS NOT DEEP INTO THE COMMUNITY, IT IS RIGHT AT A MAIN
DRAG, RIGHT WHERE IF YOU ARE COMING FROM DOWNTOWN, YOU SEE
THIS BEAUTIFUL BUILDING AND YOU SAY, I AM HOME.
THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED FOR THE YOUNG PEOPLE, THE
PROFESSIONALS GROWING UP OR SOME PEOPLE DOWNSIZING.
THESE ARE NOT BIG APARTMENTS.
THEY ARE EXCLUSIVE.
WE ARE PLEASED WITH THE PARKING.
THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS WE HAD PROBLEMS OVER THE YEARS.
PROJECTS COME UP AND THERE IS NO PARKING.
YOU CAN'T EVEN GET TO YOUR MAILBOX.
THIS COMPANY HAS DESIGNED IT SO THERE IS PARKING FOR
EVERYBODY, INCLUDING COMPANY.
THE OTHER THING IS, A PERSONAL THING, THERE IS A DOGGY
PLACE.
YOU DON'T SEE PEOPLE PICKING UP DOO-DOO IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.
[LAUGHTER]
BUT AT THIS PLACE, THEY HAVE A PLACE TO GO.
THIS COMPANY DESIGNED IT THAT WAY.
THEY MADE SURE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS HAPPY.
A PLACE FOR THE RESIDENTS -- AND YOU CAN BRING ANY DOG YOU
WANT.
IF YOU WANT TO BRING A CORGI FROM ENGLAND, YOU MAY.
JUST BRING THE LIMOUSINE TOO.
BUT THE POINT IS, THEY HAVE DESIGNED THIS PROPERTY
BEAUTIFULLY.
THE TRAFFIC IS NOT GOING TO BOTHER -- WE KNOW THERE IS GOING
TO BE CONSTRUCTION.
WE KNOW THERE IS GOING TO BE DUST AND EVERYTHING.
BUT WE HAVE GONE THROUGH IT.
THERE ARE SOME BEAUTIFUL PROJECTS, NOT ENOUGH PARKING.
THERE IS SOME PRINCE GEORGE'S WHERE IT IS RIGHT ON THE
STREET.
EVERYBODY IS PARKING EVERYWHERE.
THIS PLACE IS DESIGNED NICELY.
IF YOU LOOK AT IT, IF YOU WALK OUT OF ANY OF THOSE UNITS,
YOU DON'T NEED A CAR!
YOU CAN PUT YOUR FINGER OUT AND CALL A CAB.
YOU CAN TAKE -- FOR $2, YOU CAN GET THE CITY BUS ANYWHERE
DOWNTOWN, WESTSHORE.
AND IF YOU WANT TO GO TO THE BEACH, GET THE OTHER BUS.
THAT LOCATION IS PERFECT FOR US.
I AM 79 YEARS OLD.
WHAT DO I NEED A CAR FOR.
FOR $2, THAT IS THE PERFECT WAY OF GOING.
IF YOU GO OUT, YOU CAN GO ONE WAY TO THE BEACH.
IF YOU WANT TO GO ANOTHER WAY, YOU CAN GO TO THE AIRPORT.
THIS IS A PERFECTLY DESIGNED.
OUR COMMUNITY IS PLEASED WITH IT.
AND WE HOPE YOU APPROVE IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
07:28:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, SIR.
07:28:47PM >>LUIS VIERA:
MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY.
07:28:54PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:28:55PM >>LUIS VIERA:
JUST FOR THE RECORD, LUIS VIERA HERE.
I HAVE BEEN LISTENING.
I JUST DIDN'T CHIME IN.
FYI, I'M HERE, SIR.
07:29:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT COUNCILMAN VIERA
HAS JOINED US VIA THE INTERNET.
07:29:08PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, SIR.
07:29:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, SIR, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
07:29:13PM >> OKAY.
GOOD EVENING.
LOUIS SIMMONS.
5707 WEST 8th STREET.
I HAVE BEEN IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
I HAVE BORN AND RAISED ON OREGON AVENUE WHEN THE YELLOW CAB
WAS THERE AND I HAVE SEEN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE
WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD.
EVERYBODY SAYS WHAT IS CONSIDERED YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
MY NEIGHBORHOOD FROM GREEN STREET TO SWANN, FROM BOULEVARD
TO ARMENIA.
THAT WAS MY WHOLE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
I HAVE BEEN IN THE AREA FOR OVER 65 YEARS.
THE PROJECT THEY ARE DEVELOPING, WE HAD MEETINGS AND THINGS
ABOUT IT.
AND I HAD THREE -- BASICALLY THREE CONCERNS.
NUMBER ONE, WOULD IT BE HOUSING FOR ELDERLY WHEN THEY WANT
TO ACTUALLY MOVE OUT OF THEIR HOUSE AND SKARL DOWN.
THEY SAID YES.
I SAY, OKAY.
SECOND MAJOR PROBLEM WAS, WHEN IS -- LIKE TWO SECONDS OF
RAIN THAT WE GET IN FLORIDA ONCE AND A WHILE, KENNEDY
BOULEVARD FLOODS UP.
WHEN THE DEVELOPERS CAME IN AND TALKING TO ME.
SAID SHOULD HAVE STORM DRAINS TO TAKE ALL OF THE EXCESS
WATER OFF THE STREET.
BECAUSE WHEN KENNEDY FLOODS UP, EVERYBODY HAS ACCESS OR
DETOUR TO NORTH B STREET.
NORTH B STREET USED TO BE A NICE SMOOTH PAVEMENT, BUT ROUGH
AREAS BECAUSE VEHICLES, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL COME
THROUGH THERE, AND TEAR UP THE STREETS WHEN KENNEDY
BOULEVARD IS FLOOD AND.
THE CITY PUT STORM TRAINS TO ALLEVIATE THE WATER IN AT AREA
TO BE A CLEAR PASSAGE.
THE ONLY THING I SAY, OKAY, SINCE YOU ARE DOING THAT.
RESTAURANT AND THINGS OF THE NEIGHTURE.
BECAUSE I USED TO BE A RESTAURANT OWNER.
WHERE YOU HAVE FACILITY FOR GREASE TRAPS AND WATER?
AND THEY SAID, YES, WE HAVE THAT PROVIDED TO.
OKAY.
ABOUT THE BUILDING ITSELF, IT IS A NICE BUILDING.
NICE STRUCTURE FROM LOOKING AT ALL THE PLANS.
WHAT I HEARD YOU EARLIER ABOUT THE PARKING SITUATION.
BECAUSE ACTUALLY WHEN THEY BUILT -- THREE YEARS OR FOUR
YEARS AGO ON OREGON, ALL THE -- THE RESIDENTS THERE HAD --
SURROUNDING PARKING INSIDE THE FACILITY, AND OUTSIDE THE
FACILITY.
AND HAVE BLOCK THE STREET WHEN THEY ARE PARKING ON BOTH SIDE
OF STREET AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC BACK AND FORTH AND WILL HAVE
TO WAVE IT OUT TO GET TO THE A NARROW -- OR ANOTHER
INTERSECTION TO GET THROUGH.
SO NOW THEY SAY THEY WILL HAVE PARKING.
SO THAT WILL ELIMINATE THE RESIDENTS TO HAVE PARKING FOR --
TO HAVE EASY ACCESS TO THE STREET.
THAT IS THE ONLY THING I HAD AS A QUESTION.
I WAS TALKING TO THE DEVELOPERS AND THINGS OF THE NATURE
THERE.
EVERYTHING ELSE THROUGH THE MEETINGS THAT WE HAD AND -- AND
ALL THE MEETINGS CITIZENS.
07:32:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
30 SECONDS, SIR.
07:32:22PM >> THROUGH ALL THE MEETINGS, EVERYTHING SEEMED TO BE OKAY.
AND I THINK IT WILL BE A NICE DEVELOPMENT IN OUR
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THANK YOU.
07:32:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:32:31PM >> GOOD EVENING.
MY NAME IS FRAN POWERS.
I AM A TENANT AT 2105 WEST KENNEDY.
I AM THE FOUNDER OF POWER STORY THEATRE.
NONPROFIT THEATRE RESIDES ON THE KENNEDY BUILDING THAT WILL
BE TORN DOWN IF YOU GRANT THE ZONING REQUEST.
OUR THEATRE HAS SERVED THIS COMMUNITY FOR 20 YEARS.
OUR MISSION IS STAGING TRUE STORIES TO OPEN MINDS AND
HEARTS.
WE HAVE NINE STAFF MEMBERS WORKING OUT OF OUR FACILITY.
WE PRODUCE FOUR PROFESSIONAL SHOWS ANNUALLY.
WE HAVE A GLOBAL VOICES OF WOMEN THEATRE FESTIVAL.
WE DO OPEN MIC NIGHTS, WORKSHOPS AND AWARD-WINNING GIRLS
THEATRE PROGRAM.
YOUNG GIRLS FROM THE INNER CITY GET FREE WORKSHOP AND FREE
PROGRAMMING FROM POWER STORIES THEATRE.
AND 40% OF ALL OF OUR TICKETS ARE GIVEN TO THE VETERANS OR
THE NONPROFIT COMMUNITY.
WE ARE HERE TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY AND SINCE OUR INCEPTION,
WE HAVE PROVIDED SERVICES FOR OVER 20,000 INDIVIDUALS.
WE HAVE BEEN HONORED AT THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE WORK WE HAVE
DONE WITH OUR YOUNG GIRLS.
WE HAVE RECEIVED THE COMMUNITY HERO AWARD.
ONE OF OUR YOUNG GIRLS HAVE RECEIVED ONE OF THE COMMUNITY
HERO AWARDS.
WE RECEIVED A WEDU AWARD AND THE DEBARTOLO SPIRIT OF
HUMANITY AWARD.
WE MOVED INTO THAT BUILDING TEN YEARS AGO AND PLANNED TO
MAKE THIS OUR FOREVER HOME.
ORIGINAL OWNERS BOTH HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS HAD THEIR FAMILY
POLICE THERE FOR 60 YEARS.
DELIGHTED THE SPORTSTORIUM, THE HISTORIC SPORTS BUILDING.
VACANT FOR A LONG TIME.
CURRENT OWNER PROMISED TO DO SOMETHING WITH IT, NEVER DID.
WE BUILT THIS THEATRE TO EMPOWER THE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE.
THIS JUST CAME TO OUR ATTENTION, WHOEVER WAS SUPPOSED TO DO
THIS, BUT THIS JUST CAME TO OUR ATTENTION TWO DAYS AGO.
WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO RALLY OUR SUPPORT.
ONE OF THE MOTHERS OF ONE OF THE GIRLS THAT WE SERVED SENT
ME A VERY LONG E-MAIL.
PART, SHE WRITES, POWER STORIES IS A GREAT PLACE FOR MY
DAUGHTER KATARA AND MANY OF THE YOUNG WOMEN.
THE THEATRES HELP THESE YOUNG LADIES FIND THEIR VOICE AND
SPARK THE FIRE IN THEM TO BECOME LEADERS.
I WATCH MY DAUGHTER GROW IN CONFIDENCE AND SELF-ESTEEM FOR
THE PAST FOUR YEARS.
POWER STORAGE IS MORE THAN A THEATRE, A PLACE WHERE WOMEN
CAN EXPRESS, BE THEMSELVES WITH NO JUDGMENT.
TEACH LEADERSHIP AND HAVE FUN WITH THEATRE AND ART.
I LIVE IN A CITY THAT PROMOTES ENTREPRENEURIALSHIP, SMALL
BUSINESS AND THE ARTS, AND I FIND MYSELF STANDING HERE
PLEADING THAT YOUR BUILDING IS NOT TORN DOWN.
AND IF IT IS, WHAT CAN POSSIBLY HAPPEN TO OUR BUILDING AND
WHAT CAN WE DO IN THE FUTURE TO KEEP OUR BUILDING AND OUR
PROGRAMS I HAVE A LIFE.
THANK YOU.
07:35:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AS MUCH.
07:35:39PM >>> CITY COUNCILMEMBERS.
AS WAS INDICATED WHAT WAS CONVENIENTLY MISSED FROM THE
EARLY OF POWER STORIES, HOUSE OF SHADOWS, A BRIDAL SHOP
AND A SPA.
I AM ASKING YOU NOT TO CHANGE OUR ZONING AND LET A ST. LOUIS
DEVELOPER TO LEVY HISTORY OF A GARGANTUAN APARTMENT.
EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER ON THE SHOPPING BLOCK, POWER
STORIES HAVE BEEN A VITAL THEATRE ON KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
ONLY THEATRE THAT OFFERS INTERNSHIP TO THE STUDENTS OF
UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA FRAN POWERS BUILT THE PROFESSIONAL
NONPROFIT THEATRE TO THE GROUND UP TURNING IT INTO A SPACE
RECOGNIZED BY MICHELLE OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
DESPITE THE DOORS BEING CLOSED DURING THE PANDEMIC, NEVER
MISS A PAYMENT TO THE LANDLORD.
THE ARCHITECTURE PLANS IS NOT SOMETHING DRAWN UP OVERNIGHT.
SOMETHING IN THE WORKS.
UNETHICAL.
A CALCULATED PLAN DESPITE THE LANDLORD ONLY NOW MENTIONING
FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME THIS WEEK THAT IT WAS SOMETHING THEY
WERE LOOKING AT OPTIONS FOR THE BUILDING.
WE WOULDN'T HAVE KNOWN THERE WAS A PUBLIC MEETING ON THE
ZONING HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THAT LONE SIGN IN THE BACK ALLEY
DESPITE WHAT WAS SAID OF MULTIPLE PHOTOS.
DEVASTATING HOW EASILY OUR THEATRE AND OTHER INDEPENDENTLY
SMALL BUSINESSES THRIVING IN THIS LOCATION CAN BE LEVELED,
ERASED, TURNED INTO AN APARTMENT PROCESS AS PART OF THE
GENTRIFICATION.
WE REACHED OUT ON THE MEDIA AND ON ALL THE TV STATIONS.
HAD WE KNOWN THE PLAN WAS IN THE WORKS WE WOULD HAVE MADE
OTHER ARRANGEMENTS.
WOULDN'T ANNOUNCED OUR 23rd SEASON INSTEAD OF BEING
BLINDSIDED AND HAVING THE RUG RIPPED FROM UNDERNEATH OUR
FEET.
IF YOU CHANGE THE ZONING HOW ARE YOU GOING TO HELP US
RELOCATE AND PRESERVE THE 22-YEAR HISTORY, OUR LEGACY.
I IMPLORE YOU, PLEASE DON'T CHANGE OUR ZONING AND ALLOW AN
OUTSIDER TO COME INTO OUR COMMUNITY AND DESTROY THE
LIVELIHOODS OF MANY SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS.
OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS AND VALUE THE ARTS.
OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS SMALL BUSINESS.
THEY NEED POWER STORIES WHERE IT IS.
PLEASE DON'T PERPETUATE CORPORATE GREED OVER COMMUNITY
VALUES.
THIS IS A DAVID AND GOLIATH SCENARIO HERE.
THIS TIME, CITY COUNCIL, IT IS YOU.
YOU HOLD THE STONE TO RENDER THE GIANT IMPOTENT.
THANK YOU.
07:38:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
I AM SORRY SIR -- MA'AM, GIVE US YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD,
PLEASE.
07:38:18PM >> DEB KELLY, I AM THE MARKETING DIRECTOR FOR POWER
STORIES.
07:38:22PM >> CHRISTINE SCENTS, POWER STORIES.
I COME FROM LOS ANGELES, A VERY CULTURAL CITY AND MOVING TO
TAMPA, I HAD A VERY HARD TIME -- STILL HAVING HARD TIME
FINDING THE CULTURE HERE, FINDING THE ARTS HERE THAT IS
SUPPORTED.
AND POWER STORIES ALLOWED ME TO DO THAT.
I THANK THEM VERY MUCH.
I -- I AM AMAZED THAT THEY ALLOW JERSEY MIKE'S TO CONTINUE
AND NOT THESE AMAZING PLACES THAT -- YOU KNOW, HOUSE THESE
ARTISTS.
AND SO I -- I WOULD LIKE TO PLEAD WITH YOU, THIS IS -- THIS
IS NOT JUST ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT FOR TAMPA THIS IS ERASING
PART OF THE CULTURE THAT YOU ALREADY DON'T HAVE HERE.
AND YOU NEED IT VERY BADLY.
THE WOMEN HERE AND THE GIRLS HERE NEED THE SUPPORT OF POWER
STORIES.
THERE IS NO OTHER PLACE THAT SUPPORTS WOMEN AND TRANSITIONS
GIRLS INTO THE POWER THAT POWER STORIES DOES.
I WOULD LIKE TO -- JUST BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO THE FACT
THAT TAMPA -- WHAT IS IT KNOWN FOR?
THE BUCS AND THE RAYS, RIGHT, AND THE LIGHTNING.
BUT NOT KNOWN FOR ITS ART.
IT IS NOT KNOWN FOR ITS THEATRE.
HERE YOU HAVE WITH TWO PLACES THAT ARE TRYING FROM THE ROOTS
TO GROW THAT.
AND YOU ARE GOING TO WIPE THEM OUT?
THINK ABOUT IT.
THINK ABOUT IT.
BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONES WHO ARE THE NEXT -- HOLDING THE
PLACE FOR OUR NEXT GENERATION AND WHAT WILL THEY HAVE.
THESE GIRLS GROWING UP HAVE POWER STORIES.
EXPOSED TO THEATRE AROUND CULTURE WHICH IS REALLY HARD TO
FIND IN FLORIDA.
I AM SORRY.
IT IS VERY HARD TO FIND.
AND THIS IS A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN FINDS IT.
AND TO WIPE IT OUT, TO WIPE OUT A 100-YEAR-OLD TREE.
IS FLORIDA -- IN TAMPA, IS NOT KNOWN FOR TREES.
COME ON, WE NEED TOWER TREES AND NOT A SIMPLE FRIVOLOUS
THING.
RIP IT OUT OF THE GROUND AND RIP OUT THE REST OF THE TREES
AND PUT THIS HUGE BUILDING -- BUT I AM SORRY, IT IS
REMINISCENT OF THE BALTIC TRANSIT CORRIDOR AND WHAT YOU ARE
PUTTING INTO TAMPA.
07:40:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IF THERE ARE NO OTHER -- IF THERE ARE NO
OTHER SPEAKERS, I WILL CONSIDER THERE ARE WOMAN HERE THE
LAST SPEAKER IN CHAMBERS.
PLEASE, MA'AM, GO AHEAD.
07:40:43PM >> HI, ANNIE GONZALEZ.
AND I AM ONE OF THE CO-OWNERS OF HOUSE OF SHADOWS THAT
RESIDES AT 2120 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
FIRST AND FOREMOST I AM A MILLENNIAL AND WE ARE VERY MUCH
INTERESTED IN CARS, ESPECIALLY ELECTRIC CARS.
I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT IT WAS ALWAYS A DREAM OF MINE TO
OWN A GALLERY AND I AM VERY HAPPY WHERE I AM.
I AM NOT AGAINST CHANGE.
I AM VERY MUCH OKAY WITH THINGS CHANGING IN TAMPA BAY.
MY ONLY ISSUE AND OUR ISSUE IS THAT WE ARE BEING DISPLACED.
AND WE WERE NOT GIVEN FORMAL NOTICE THE WAY WE WERE
SUPPOSEDED TO.
THAT IS ALL I WANTED TO SAY.
THANK YOU.
07:41:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THERE ARE ONLY THREE?
OKAY.
MISS MANDEL, MR. ATKINS AND MR. RAMIREZ.
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
MR. RAMIREZ, YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
MR. ATKINS AND MISS MANDEL.
[SWEARING IN]
07:41:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGAIN, LADIES FIRST, MISS MANDEL.
YOU HAVE TO UNMUTE YOURSELF.
07:42:03PM >> THANK YOU.
I APOLOGIZE.
I AM NOW UNMUTED.
THANK YOU AND GOOD EVENING.
JULIA MANDEL, AN ATTORNEY FOR GRAY, ROBINSON.
101 KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
I PROVIDED CORRESPONDENCE IN THIS MAT THEIR MR. SINGER DID
ADDRESS AS WELL, BUT I REPRESENT BILL ATKINS AND THE LEASE
INTEREST OWNER OF THE JERSEY MIKE'S AND TAMPA NAIL SALON
THAT IS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE PLAN AS RETAIL.
AND -- I WILL STAY THIS JUST KIND OF LISTENING TO WHAT IS
HAPPENING, WHILE I DO THINK THAT THE APPLICANT DID MAKE
EFFORTS TO REACH OUT TO THE COMMUNITY, IT DOES SEEM TO
APPEAR THAT THEY DID NOT SPEND AS MUCH TIME REACHING OUT
TENANTS THAT ARE WITHIN THAT AREA.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT IS, BUT THAT DID OCCUR.
AND I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, OF COURSE, AS TENANTS, WE DON'T
HAVE RIGHTS FOR NOTICE, BUT WE WERE AWARE THIS WAS MOVING
FORWARD AND I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH BILL AIKENS ON THAT.
IN OUR LETTER, WE NOTE WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE, BUT REALLY A
BIGGER THING.
FOR OUR BUILDING, IT IS NOT INTEGRATED INTO THE PROJECT.
IT IS SORT OF AN AFTERTHOUGHT OF THE OUTPARCEL.
I UNDERSTAND BECAUSE LEASEHOLDS INTEREST THAT ARE NOT CITY
COUNCIL'S CONCERN.
WITH THAT BEING SAID IF YOU LOOK AT A PROJECT AND OVERALL
CAPACITY AND WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH, YOU HAVE TO
LOOK AT THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE.
MY SENSE IS THIS PROJECT WASN'T REALLY LOOKED AT AS WHOLE,
ESPECIALLY AS IT RELATES TO THIS BUILDING.
AS WE INDICATED AND MR. ATKINS WILL STATE, THERE ARE
CONCERNS ON OUR PART AS TO HOW THE PARKING IS GOING TO WORK.
HOW THE ACCESS POINTS ARE GOING TO WORK.
OUT THE GREASE TRAP IS GOING TO BE CLEANED.
WHERE OUR DUMPSTER IS GOING TO BE.
HOW IS -- WHAT IS REALLY AN OUTPARCEL, HOW IS THAT GOING TO
BE TREATED.
MAYBE THAT IS JUST A LEASEHOLD INTEREST, IT IS REALLY NOT
BECAUSE THE SITE PLAN IS HOLDING THAT OUT.
I THINK THAT AN ISSUE THAT THIS APPLICANT DOES NEED TO
ADDRESS.
INDICATED -- MR. SINGER ADDRESSED THAT HE INTENDS TO BE
ADDRESS IT.
BUT ON THE SITE PLAN, NO INDICATION WHERE PARKING WILL BE
ALLOWED AND HOW THAT WILL ALL FUNCTION TOGETHER.
THOSE ISSUES AS I KNOW IF NOT ADDRESSED NOW, AS I AM SURE
EVERYBODY IS AWARE, THOSE ISSUES WILL NOT BE ADDRESSED
LATER.
I, AGAIN, UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S INTEREST
HERE.
I UNDERSTAND THE OTHER TENANTS AND WHERE THIS POSITION IS,
THIS IS FOR NOT, NOT JUST A TENTACY ISSUE, OF THE SITE PLAN
HOW IT IS INTERGREAT AND WORKS TOGETHER AND HOW IT WILL PLAY
TOGETHER IN THE LONG RUN.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND END MY COMMENTS UNLESS THERE ARE ANY
QUESTIONS.
I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME TODAY.
07:45:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
MR. ATKINS.
07:45:18PM >> THANK YOU.
I AM GOING TO CUT MINE A LITTLE SHORTER.
MISS MANDEL HITS ON SOME OF THE POINTS.
MY NAME CECIL BILL ATKINS.
I AM THE OWNER OF THE JERSEY MIKE'S ON THE SITE PLAN.
MY SUBTENANT IS THE TAMPA NAIL SALON.
WE HAVE BEEN DOING BUSINESS THERE FOR TEN YEARS.
OUR SITUATION IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT.
YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE FOLKS THE THEATRE ARE IN A
LITTLE DIFFERENT SITUATION.
I DEFINITELY FEEL FOR THEM.
I KNOW EXACTLY HOW THEY ARE FEELING DOWN THERE.
I HOPE THINGS DO WORK OUT THERE.
BUT FOR MYSELF, WE ARE -- WE ARE IN OPPOSITION OF THE SITE
PLAN AS IT IS CURRENTLY DESIGNED.
CURRENTLY AS WE HAVE BEEN OPERATING FOR TEN PLUS YEARS, WE
HAVE 20 PLUS PARKING SPACES.
WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT ACCESS POINTS.
WE HAVE AVAILABLE PER OUR DELIVERY TRUCKS NOT TO PARK IN THE
STREET.
AND REALLY THE MOST GLARING THING WE SAW WHEN WE WERE SHOWN
THE PLAN WAS THE REDUCTION IN THE REMOVAL OF THESE PARKING
FIELDS.
THEY ARE REDUCING BASICALLY OUR PARKING.
JUST THE FRONT OF OUR BUILDING.
11 SPACES.
WE ARE LOSING OUR ACCESS OFF KENNEDY.
WE ARE LOSING THE ALLEY IN THE BACK WITH THE DELIVERY TRUCKS
WHICH HAVE ACCESS TO OUR BACK DOORS A SO WE DON'T HAVE TO
DELIVER THROUGH OUR CUSTOMER LINES AND OUR LOBBIES AND OUR
STORES.
AND WE ARE LEFT WITH JUST THE 11 SPACES.
WE ARE BEING TOLD THAT THEY ARE GOING TO MOVE OUR PARKING OR
GIVE US MORE PARKING OFFSITE IN THE GARAGE, BUT WITH ALL DUE
RESPECT TO MR. SINGER, THE 39 BUSINESSES THAT THEY HAVE
CONTACTED ABOUT THIS, I WASN'T ONE OF THEM.
I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT -- I SEE THE PLANS.
I SEE PARKING.
BUT THEY HAVE GIVEN ME NO IDEA WHERE WE GET TO PARK.
WHO WOULD MONITOR THAT PARKING.
YOU KNOW, THING OF THAT NATURE.
THE DELIVERY VEHICLES -- EXCUSE ME, THE DELIVERY TRUCKS, IT
IS AN ISSUE.
YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PULL IN THE NOW TIGHT 11-SPACE AREA.
THEY WILL BE ON THE STREETS TO DELIVER.
AND THEY DELIVER at ALL TIMES OF THE DAY.
THESE DAYS YOU TAKE WHAT YOU CAN GET.
OUR OVERALL BIGGEST CONCERN IS SIMPLY AT THIS POINT THE LACK
OF CONCERN THAT WE HAVE BEEN SHOWN BY THE -- WHAT WOULD BE
OUR POTENTIAL NEW LANDLORD.
WE HAVEN'T SPOKE TO THEM SINCE EARLY NOTICE YEAR.
AND THEY HAVE NOT ABOUT ANY OF THE WHY $OR CHANGES.
I AM NOT WHAT THE 39 BUSINESSES WERE BUT WE DIDN'T GET THE
OPPORTUNITY.
THIS IS VERY CONCERNING TO US.
IT COULD HAVE A TREMENDOUS IMPACT TRYING TO OPERATE TWO
FULL-TIME RETAIL BUSINESSES AND HAVE A HIGH NEGATIVE IMPACT
FOR OUR CUSTOMERS AND QUITE FRANKLY THE 25 TO 30 FAMILIES WE
EMPLOY IN THAT AREA.
SO I DO APPRECIATE THE TIME YOU HAVE GIVEN ME TO SPEAK.
AND THANKS VERY MUCH.
07:48:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, SIR.
MR. RAMIREZ.
07:48:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU ARE MUTED -- UNMUTED.
EXCUSE ME.
07:48:55PM >> CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
07:49:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, SIR.
07:49:01PM >> ALL RIGHT.
CARLOS RAMIREZ, WEST CARMEN.
I WAS APPROACHED BY THE DEVELOPER OF THE APPLICANT BACK IN
MAY OF THIS YEAR.
I HAD A LOT OF COMMENTS AND A LOT OF CONCERNS.
ONE OF THEM BEING THEY ARE CALLED LOCAL, BUT THEY ARE NOT.
HOWEVER, THEY HAVE MET WITH ME EXTENSIVELY.
THEY HAVE MET WITH THE COMMUNITY A LOT.
THEY HAVE LISTENED AND I GAVE MR. SINGER A VERY LONG LIST OF
THINGS I DID NOT LIKE ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THEY -- THEY LISTENED FOR MOST OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD
CONCERNS ON.
SO THEY CAME TO OUR NORTH HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING LAST NIGHT.
AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS VOTED TO SUPPORT THEM.
SO I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW.
VERY QUICKLY ON A PERSONAL LEVEL, I AM WITH COUNCILWOMAN
HURTAK.
THERE HAS TO BE SOME KIND OF PROTECTION FOR SMALL BUSINESSES
AND PEOPLE WHO ARE LEASING BIG OFFICES TO BE ABLE TO GET
NOTICE.
GOOD NEIGHBOR NOTICE.
I HOPE IT SEE THAT IN A FUTURE WORKSHOP OR SOMETHING NEW
COMING DOWN THE LINE.
ALSO VERY QUICKLY.
I KNOW THERE WAS A LOT ABOUT TRAFFIC.
PERSONALLY, I THINK WE MAKE IT WAY TOO EASY FOR PEOPLE TO
PARK AND DRIVE WHICH IS THE REASON WE HAVE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS.
I THINK THE HARDER WE MAKE IT FOR SOMEBODY TO DRIVE, THE
MORE PUSH THERE WILL BE FOR MOBILITY, TRANSIT AND THINGS
LIKE THAT.
SO JUST TWO PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS THAT I WANTED TO GIVE OUT.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
07:50:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS LIKE TO GIVE COMMENT?
MR. SINGER, REBUTTAL.
07:50:38PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. CHAIR.
07:50:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:50:51PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I HAVE COMMENTS TO MAKE, DO YOU WANT ME TO
DO IT NOW SO HE CAN REBUT THEM?
07:51:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF YOU WISH -- IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR
SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS, IT IS BEST
TO DO IT BEFORE --
07:51:08PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I CAN MAKE A COMMENT AND HE CAN RESPOND TO
IT.
I JUST WANT -- I JUST WANT TO SAY IN REGARD TO THE PUBLIC
COMMENT, I PERSONALLY AND THIS BOARD THIS CITY COUNCIL HAVE
AGGRESSIVELY SUPPORTED THE ARTS I THINK MORE THAN MAYBE ANY
OTHER CITY COUNCIL IN THE LAST THREE YEARS.
WE PUT IN -- WHEN IT IS ALL ADDED UP, WE WILL PUT IN CLOSE
TO $100 MILLION TO SUPPORT THE ARTS THROUGH THE CRAS IN THE
LAST THREE OR FOUR YEARS.
I AM SORRY I NOT PERSONALLY BEEN INVOLVED IN YOUR
ORGANIZATIONS.
I LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING TO KNOW THEM.
AS A SUPPORT OF THE ARTS, IT IS HEARTBREAKING HEARING THE
STORIES THAT YOU ALL TALK ABOUT.
AND IT IS ALSO HEARTBREAKING SEEING THAT HAD YOU HAVEN'T
BEEN THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE.
THIS IS APPEAR VERY SPECIFIC LEGAL PROCESS WE HAVE TO FOLLOW
HERE.
AND AS THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND THE ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT
SAID IT BEFORE, WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO GET INVOLVED -- WE ARE
NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO CONSIDER WHO THE TENANTS ARE.
IN MOST APPLICATIONS, WE MAY KNOW THAT A -- WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED
TO KNOW WHO THE ESSENTIALTANTS ARE, WHO IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN
THERE.
WE ARE NOT ALLOW TO CONSIDER THAT AT ALL.
SO THE LEGAL CAN TELL ME IF I AM WRONG, BUT WHAT THEY
USUALLY TELL US IS THAT -- THAT A LOT OF THE EVIDENCE THAT
YOU ALL PRESENTED ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING INSIDE THESE
FACILITIES, THE SAME THING AS MIKE'S SUBS, WE ARE NOT EVEN
ALLOWED TO CONSIDER THAT IT IS MIKE'S SUBS.
IF THE COMMUNITY CAME TO US AND SAID WE WOULD RATHER HAVE
SUBWAY INSTEAD OF MIKE'S SUBS.
WE CAN'T CONSIDER THAT, CAN'T CONSIDER IT OTHER THAN THE
ACTUAL USE.
AND THE BUILDING IS NOT HISTORIC.
SO IT IS NOT PROTECTED ANYWAY.
NO SPECIAL DESIGNATION WITH THE ARTS.
WE ARE ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO COACH ANY OF YOU OF HOW TO PUT
TOGETHER COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OR TO GO THROUGH ANY
OF THESE PROCESSES.
THE STAFF MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR YOU IN THE
NEXT FEW DAYS.
WITH ALL THAT SAID, WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE -- THE EVIDENCE
AS ALLOWED BY LAW REGARDING THE USE OF THIS FACILITY.
WE ALSO CAN'T CONSIDER THAT IT IS AN OUT-OF-TOWN INVESTOR IF
IT IS.
WE HAVE TO LOOK AT -- AT THE REPORTS BY STAFF.
AND WE HAVE TO USE THE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT
IS PRESENTED.
THE LAST THING I WILL SAY, IF IT PASSES -- TWO THINGS.
IF IT PASSES TONIGHT, THERE IS A SECOND READING.
AND TYPICALLY FOLKS WITH DPREEF ADVANCES HAVE A DISCUSSION
WITH APPLICANT BEFORE AND SECOND READING.
THEY WANT THE PUBLIC TO COME AND SUPPORT THE PROJECT.
AND STAFF WILL ADVISE YOU WHAT TO DO AND WHAT NOT TO DO.
AND THE LAST THING IS WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EVEN -- NOT
ALLOWED TO HAVE ANY CONVERSATION TO YOU BY E-MAIL OR PHONE.
AND NOT -- DURING IN PROCESS AND FOR 30 DAYS THEREAFTER.
IF IT TURNS OUT YOU ARE NO LONGER TENANTS AND YOU NEED OUR
HELP IN SOME WAY, CONTACT US 30 DAYS AFTER AND I AM SURE WE
WILL BE GLAD TO HELP.
THANK YOU.
07:54:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCIL.
07:54:33PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THERE IS A TIME TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION,
BUT FRANKLY WHAT YOU SAID IS TRUE TO ONE PART OF THE
CRITERIA.
ONE PART -- ONE ITEM ON THE AGENDA BUT NOT NECESSARILY TRUE
TO ANOTHER PART OF THE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA THAT YOU ARE
CONSIDERING.
BUT I WILL LEAVE IT GO AT THAT.
BUT THE CONCERN I HAVE IS WHEN YOU COMBINE HEARINGS AND
COMBINE PRESENTATIONS WITH DIFFERENT CRITERIA, THEY MELD
TOGETHER AND CREATE A RECORD THAT IS HARD TO SEPARATE AND
SEGREGATE.
THAT BEING SAID -- WITH THAT BEING SAID, I UNDERSTAND YOUR
POINTS AND I UNDERSTAND THAT MR. SINGER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR REBUTTAL.
BUT I -- I WILL SAY THESE COMMENTS I HAVE THAT -- SAVE THESE
COMMENTS THAT I HAVE FOR ANOTHER TIME.
07:55:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:55:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I HAVE TO AGREE WITH MR. CARLSON.
YOU CAN DO IT SEPARATELY.
BECAUSE IF YOU PASS THE FIRST ONE WHICH IS THE COMP PLAN,
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AND THEN VOTE
AGAINST THE OTHER ONE.
GUESS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
A BIG OL' PROBLEMO SUIT IN THE COURTHOUSE.
WHY YOU PASSED THE FIRST ONE, ATTACHED 7 AND 16 WERE
ATTACHED TO NUMBER 1
AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS 7 OR 16, I REMEMBER SOMETHING LIKE
THAT.
THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT I THINK THAT WE ARE TRYING TO GET
-- WORK OUT.
AND I AM SURE THAT IN THE NEAR FUTURE WHEN OTHER THINGS ARE
GOING TO HAPPEN, WE HAVE NOW HEARD -- NOT IN THIS CASE BUT
IN OTHER CASES SIMILAR TO THIS THE SAME THING ABOUT THE
TENANT NOT KNOWING WHAT IS HAPPENING.
AND THIS IS GOING ON NOW FOR SOMETHING -- I AM NOT REFERRING
IT TO THIS CASE.
I SAID IT EARLIER, BUT THERE IS STILL THE SOLID WASTE THING.
A DOMINO EFFECT.
YOU CAN'T HAVE TWO CANS AND HAVE PEOPLE MOVING IN AT THE
SAME TIME.
AND THE PARKING GARAGE WITH 23% REDUCTION.
THAT MAY BE TRUE THAT THE PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO DRIVE, BUT I
HAVEN'T MET THEM YET.
MAYBE THE CITY IS CHANGING.
A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING FROM NEW YORK.
LIVING DOWNTOWN MAYBE THEY DON'T HAVE TO WALK.
THEY DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A CAR.
MAYBE, I SAID, BECAUSE I STILL THINK -- AND, ARE THERE -- WE
ARE CHANGING NOW THE CODE ON THE EV CHARGING
STATIONS.
I AM SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS ON AN ONGOING BASIS.
IS IT A BEAUTIFUL BUILDING?
NO, IT IS NOT BEAUTIFUL, IT IS GORGEOUS.
IS IT NEEDED?
YES.
IS IT CAPABLE OF HANDLING THINGS?
I WOULD SAY YES.
WITH SOME RESERVATIONS.
BUT THEN YOU HAVE THE OTHER THINGS THAT YOU LOOK AT, THE
LOADING BERTH, THE POSSIBLE SPILLAGE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE REDUCTION IN PARKING THAT MAYBE
THE OTHER SIX -- SEVEN DON'T FEEL THAT WAY.
SIX DON'T FEEL THAT WAY BUT THE SEVENTH ONE DOES.
I DON'T BELIEVE BASED ON MY OWN FAMILY, NOT ONLY MY
GRANDKIDS BUT ALL MY FAMILY'S GRANDKIDS.
FIRST THING THEY WANT IT A CAR.
MAYBE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN TO NEW YORK -- THEY HAVE BEEN TO NEW
YORK BUT NEVER LIVED THERE.
THAT IS THE ONLY THING I CAN SAY.
THANK YOU.
07:57:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SINGER, REBUTTAL.
07:57:51PM >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR AND THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION AGAIN.
I KNOW IT HAS BEEN A LONG DAY, AND I WILL TRY TO BE BRIEF
AND I WILL ADDRESS A FEW THINGS AND HOPEFULLY IN RAPID
SUCCESSION.
FIRST ONE IS REGARDING THE JERRY MIKE'S PARCEL.
WHAT YOU SEE HERE OUTLINED IN ORANGE IS THE JERSEY MIKE'S
PARCEL.
AND IT IS THE ONLY PIECE THAT IS UNDER THE JERSEY MIKE'S
CONTROL.
THROUGH THEIR LEASE.
AND THAT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHAT MR. ATKINS AND WHAT MISS
MANDEL WAS REFERRING TO WHEN THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT
ADDITIONAL PARKING WAS THIS RIGHT HERE.
AND THIS RIGHT HERE.
THIS IS OUTSIDE OF WHAT THEY HAVE LEASED.
THEY HAVE NO ENTITLEMENT TO IT AT ALL.
IN FACT, WHAT OUR ACTIONS ARE DOING AND WHAT THIS PARKING
GARAGE WILL BE DOING CLEANING UP PROBLEMS ON KENNEDY.
NOT THE FIRST PROBLEM ON KENNEDY WITH PARKING THAT YOU HAVE
SEEN.
RETAILERS HAVE BEEN USE PARKING THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN
ENTITLED TO.
I WOULD CAUTION YOU THAT OCTOBER 2012 APPROVAL THAT MISS
MANDEL APPROVED IN HER LETTER IS NOT SIMPLY A ZONING
APPROVAL BUT AN ARCHITECT PERMIT REQUEST, AND THEY INCLUDED
THIS PARKING WHICH THEY ARE NOT ENTITLED TO.
INSTEAD, THEY ARE GOING TO BE OFFERED SPACES IN THE GARAGE.
WITH CLOSE ACCESS TO THE FRONT OF THEIR BUILDING.
NOW NEVER IN A PD IS PARKING ABSOLUTELY ASSIGNED AT THE TIME
OF ZONING TO A PARTICULAR TENANT.
IT IS WITHIN YOUR CONSIDERATION THAT THERE IS ENOUGH SPACES
THERE TO ACCOMMODATE THE TENANTS AND THEN BETWEEN THE
LANDLORD AND THE TENANT TO DETERMINE EXACTLY WHERE IT IS.
BUT I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT JERSEY MIKE'S AT PRESENT TIME
WITH NO ACTION ONLY ENTITLED TO THESE SPACES RIGHT HERE.
I THINK THAT IS A POSITIVE CHANGE FOR JERSEY MIKE'S.

WHAT YOU SEE OUTLINED IN ORANGE IS THE JERSEY MIKE'S PARCEL
AND IT IS THE ONLY PIECE THAT IS UNDER THE JERSEY MIKE'S
CONTROL.
AND THAT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHAT MR. ATKINS AND MS.
MANDELL WERE REFERRING TO WHEN NECESSITY WERE REFERRING TO
ADDITIONAL PARKING IS THIS RIGHT HERE.
AND THIS RIGHT HERE.
AND I THINK THAT'S A POSITIVE CHANGE, MR. ATKINS SAYING HE
IS NOT AWARE OF THE PLAN.
I THINK IT'S STATED BY MS. MANDELL SAYING SHE WAS IN CONTACT
WITH US SINCE APRIL, AND I HAVE BEEN IN NEGOTIATIONS SINCE
APRIL.
AND TO SAY THEY ARE NOT AWARE OF THE PLAN I THINK STRETCHES
REASON.
I WANT TO POINT TO THE SITE PLAN.
NOTE 29 SAYS ALL DELIVERIES UTILIZING THE LOADING SPACE
SHARED WITH SOLID WASTE TO AVOID CONFLICT, THE TRASH PICKUP
TIME, ALL LOADING WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE APPROVED TIME.
THAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN, NEGOTIATED ABOUT CITY STAFF AND
THE APPLICANT; ABOUT LOADING, OR ABOUT DELIVERIES.
THE LAST THING THAT I WOULD POINT YOU TO AGAIN IS THE
INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF OUTREACH NOW.
WE HEARD FROM SOME TENANTS, AND I SHARE YOUR FRUSTRATION, I
SHARE THEIR FRUSTRATION.
WE DID THE BEST WE COULD.
WE DID EVERYTHING WE COULD UNDER THE CODE.
WE HELD MEETINGS, WE KNOCKED ON DOORS, EVERY SINGLE OWNER
HAS BEEN AWARE OF THIS, HAS BEEN INVOLVED SINCE THE
BEGINNING.
THE FACT THAT THEY ARE NOT SHARING THIS WITH THEIR TENANTS,
YOU CAN'T PUNISH THE APPLICANT FOR THAT.
IT'S NOT REASONABLE.
YOUR LEGAL STAFF HAS TOLD YOU THAT YOU CAN'T CONSIDER TENANT
LEASES IN THIS, AND UNFORTUNATELY I HAVE TO AGREE WITH THEM,
AND I WANT TO POINT YOU TO THE SUPPORT FROM THE NORTH HYDE
PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE NORTH HYDE PARK BUSINESS
ALLIANCE, HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO GET THESE COMMUNITY GROUPS
TO EMBRACE A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THIS.
THERE'S NOTHING IN THE RECORD SUGGESTING THAT IT'S
INCOMPATIBLE ON THE NORTHERN PART OF THE SITE.
THERE'S NOTHING IN THE RECORD TO SUGGEST THAT THESE ALLEYS
SHOULD NOT BE VACATED.

THERE IS ROBUST DISCUSSION ON THE ZONING BUT AGAIN THE
TENANTS WHO OCCUPY THE RETAIL SPACE SIMPLY CAN'T BE
CONSIDERED IN YOUR DELIBERATIONS.
I WOULD ASK THAT YOU RESPECT THAT.
I THINK THIS APPLICANT HAS GONE OVER AND ABOVE NOT ONLY IN
THEIR REDESIGN, NOT ONLY IN THEIR OUTREACH TO THE COMMUNITY,
BUT IN THEIR CONSIDERATION OF COMPATIBILITY WITH THE KENNEDY
TRANSIT CORRIDOR IN OUR GROWING CITY.
AND I WOULD ASK THAT YOU APPROVE THE THREE APPLICATIONS.
8:02:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WOULD LIKE HIM TO FINISH.
HE HAS BEEN INTERRUPTED THROUGH REBUTTAL.
8:02:34PM >> WITH THAT I CERTAINLY WOULD ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS IF YOU
HAVE ANY.
8:02:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
8:02:41PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
COULD YOU PUT BACK UP THE COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT?
8:02:45PM >> YES, SIR.
8:02:47PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
AND LEGAL IS RIGHT, MR. SHELBY IS RIGHT,
YOU AND WE KNOCKED ON 260 DOORS, AND THESE PROPERTIES ARE --
PROPERTIES THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO GET REZONED.
IN MY MIND, IN THAT CASE, I KNOCK ON THEIR DOOR REGARDLESS
IF THEY OWN THE BUILDING OR NOT, IT'S OPERATED.
8:03:18PM >> DAVID SINGER:
MAY I ADDRESS THAT?
THERE IS A LEGAL PROBLEM WITH AN APPLICANT WHO DOES NOT OWN
A PIECE OF PROPERTY COMING TO A TENANT WHO IS IN A LEASE

WITH ANOTHER LANDLORD AND DISCUSSING A POTENTIAL OWNERSHIP
SCENARIO.
IT'S NOT ALLOWED.
IT'S TORTUOUS INTERFERENCE WITH THEIR CONTRACT.
WE CANNOT DO IT LEGALLY, AS MUCH AS WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IT.
8:03:39PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I'M GLAD YOU EXPLAINED THAT FOR THE
RECORD.
THAT'S WHY I ASKED, BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW THAT, AND THEY
WERE SAYING YOU KNOCKED OR DOORS AND THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT
THAT OUT.
IF THERE ARE LEGAL ISSUES, WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT BUT NOW
THEY KNOW THERE'S A LEGAL SITUATION THAT'S AGAINST THE LAW.
8:03:57PM >> YES, SIR.
8:03:58PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, SIR.
8:03:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
WE HAVE THREE MOTIONS WE HAVE TO MAKE HERE.
THE FIRST ONE WE'LL GO TO COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, FILE TA --
I'M SORRY.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
THANK YOU.
THE FIRST WE HAVE TO MAKE IS NUMBER 1, FILE TA/CPA 22-03.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.

8:04:40PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE
MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2110 WEST NORTH A, 105 AND
107 NORTH WESTLAND AVENUE, 108 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE NUMBER 1
AND 2 AND 110 AND 112 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE FROM COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 CMU-35 TO URBAN MIXED USE 60, UMU-60, PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:05:18PM >>LUIS VIERA:
SECOND.
8:05:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:05:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
8:05:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:05:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:05:34PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:05:35PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:05:37PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:05:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:05:39PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:05:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, WILL YOU TAKE ITEM

NUMBER 7?
8:06:00PM >> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CLOSING VACATING
DISCONTINUING ABANDONING THAT ALLEYWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED
NORTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF NORTH A STREET, EAST OF
WESTLAND AVENUE AND WEST OF ALBANY AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF
WEST LAND SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY FLORIDA AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 HEREOF
SUBJECT TO CERTAIN COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS
MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH HEREIN PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT
AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS,
INTERPRETATIONS AND REPEALING CONFLICTS, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:06:36PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
8:06:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:06:46PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:06:48PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:06:50PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:06:52PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:06:53PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:06:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
8:06:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:06:56PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO.

SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:07:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES, WILL YOU HANDLE AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 16, REZ 22-71?
8:07:13PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
REZ 22-71, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING CONSIDERS, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN
THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 29110 WEST NORTH A STREET, 105 AND
107 NORTH WESTLAND AVENUE, 106, 110 AND 112 NORTH ALBANY
AVENUE, 108 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE NUMBER 1 AND 2 AND 2101,
2117 AND 2121 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
ZONING CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL, AND RM-16
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RETAIL SALES RESTAURANT PERSONAL
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:07:56PM >> SECOND.
8:07:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WILL YOU EXPAND ON YOUR FINDINGS A LITTLE
MORE, COUNCILMAN GUDES?
8:08:02PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU.
I MOVE THE ORDINANCE REZ 22-71, PROVIDES COMPETENT,
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED AND
SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND THE CITY CODE AND FINDS THE REQUESTED WAIVERS WILL
NOT IMPACT THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF RESIDENTS, THAT THE
PROPOSED REZONING COMPLIES WITH LAND USE POLICY 9-2-1 AND

HOUSING POLICY 1.3.1. 1.3.3 AND 1.3.4 WHICH SEEK TO ENSURE
ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION,
AND ENCOURAGE HOUSING THROUGH REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT OR
UNDERUTILIZED SITES, AND THE PROPOSED REZONING COMPLIES WITH
LAND USE POLICY 6.1.2 WHICH ENCOURAGES RESIDENTIAL,
MIXED-USE, RETAIL, SERVICE COMMERCIAL, AND OTHER
PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED USES ALONG MIXED-USE CORRIDORS.
8:09:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND THE REVISION SHEET.
8:09:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
AND THE REVISION SHEET.
8:09:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON?
8:09:27PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
I AM GOING TO VOTE NO ON THIS ONE AND I NEED TO STATE THE
REASONS WHY BASED ON THE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
REGARDING THE TREE, THE LOADING DOCKS, THE REDUCTION OF
PARKING AND THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING IN PARTICULAR
TO THIS.
8:09:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS?
I WILL MAKE MY COMMENT.
I BELIEVE PETITIONER HEARD MY CONCERN.
I AM VOTING YES FOR THIS NOW, BUT AGAIN I AM HOPING
PETITIONER HEARD MY CONCERNS.

ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:09:56PM >>BILL CARLSON:
NO.
8:10:01PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:10:02PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:10:05PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:10:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
[OFF MICROPHONE]
8:10:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:10:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:10:14PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON AND MIRANDA VOTING
NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:10:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
I HAVE HAD A REQUEST THAT WE TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK.
(RECESS)
8:25:41PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
8:25:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
8:25:44PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
8:25:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
8:25:48PM >>THE CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
8:25:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NEXT CASE IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE
NUMBER AB 2-22-04.
8:25:57PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, CASE AB 2-22-04, IS REQUESTING A
SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A RESTAURANT, BEER AND WINE CONSUMPTION ON

PREMISES AT A LOCATION 1724 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
YOU HAVE NORTH NEBRASKA TO THE EAST, YOU ALSO HAVE EAST
PALM, AND 7th, AND THEN OF COURSE YOU RUN INTO YBOR.
AB SALES AREA 1,536 SQUARE FEET INDOORS.
THE PROPERTY IS IN THE YBOR CITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING
DISTRICT, YC-5.
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SITE COMES OFF OF EAST 7TH AVENUE,
AND NORTH NEBRASKA.
AND I WILL SHOW YOU.
THE REQUIRED PARKING, AND I WILL SHARE THE SITE PLAN.
THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE SITE IS THREE SPACES AND THE
SITE PLAN IS SHOWING 12 MARKING SPACES BEING PROPOSED FOR
THE RESTAURANT ESTABLISHMENT.
THERE IS A PROPOSED WAIVER HERE UNDER SECTION 27-132, AND
REDUCE THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM 250 FEET TO 197
FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS.
THERE IS A 2-K FOOD MART, INC., 197 FEET AWAY.
I WILL NOW SHOW YOU ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
ELEVATION ON THE WEST SIDE.
FROM THE EAST.
SOUTH.
AND TO THE NORTH.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE MYSELF, TOOK PICTURES.

YOU SEE THE SITE AS IS.
YOU HAVE THE SITE HERE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT.
YOU HAVE BAR.
YOU HAVE YOGA.
YOU HAVE TATTOO.
AND TO THE SOUTH --
8:29:08PM >> THERE YOU GO.
[ LAUGHTER ]
8:29:10PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
MORE TO THE SOUTH ON NEBRASKA HERE YOU HAVE
THE FACTORY TO THE SOUTH OF THE YOGA AND TATTOO PARLOR.
SO SOUTH OF THE SITE.
YOU HAVE DOWN NEBRASKA, YOU WILL HAVE APARTMENTS AND MORE
CHANNELSIDE DOWN THERE.
TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE EAST 7th, DOWN TO YBOR.
MORE VACANT LAND.
ALSO HAVE A MINI MART OUT THERE.
TO THE WEST, YBOR HEALTH CARE CLINIC.
TO THE NORTH YOU WILL HAVE THIS VACANT PARKING LOT OR VACANT
LAND.
ONE MORE PICTURE TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE TRAFFIC LIGHT
LEADING DOWN TO YBOR.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND THE OVERALL
REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
IF IT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND

READING.
THANK YOU.
8:30:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUSSEIN?
8:31:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IS THIS A BAR OR RESTAURANT?
8:31:06PM >> RESTAURANT.
THE PROPOSED USE IS A RESTAURANT.
8:31:09PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
RESTAURANT.
CORRECT.
8:31:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
8:31:15PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WHAT IS INCONSISTENT?
8:31:17PM >> INCONSISTENT DUE TO THE ONE WAIVER, THE DISTANCE
SEPARATION.
8:31:21PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, SORRY.
8:31:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
APPLICANT?
8:31:31PM >> GOOD EVENING, CASEY FELDMERE, BOY SCOUT ROAD, ON BEHALF
OF THE APPLICANT.
I HAVE HAD TO SIT THROUGH THE LAST FEW HOURS SO I WILL BEING
VERY, VERY, VERY BRIEF.
I COMMAND STAFF FOR THEIR HARD WORK TO BE VERY BRIEF ON THE
HISTORY THEREOF, THIS HAS BEEN AN APPLICATION THAT'S BEEN
GOING ON SINCE APRIL OF 2021, STARTED AS AN AB 1, WE MOVED
TO THE AN AB 2 EARLIER THIS YEAR AND OF COURSE WITH ALL THE
BACKUP WE COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE CITY COUNCIL'S FULL

SCHEDULE, AND SO THEREFORE WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PREPARE
AND TRYING TO PREPARE AND TRYING TO GET THIS RIGHT.
ZAIN HAS BEEN WORKING WITH US.
THERE ARE SOME MINOR SITE PLAN REDUCTIONS THAT WE ARE
WILLING TO MAKE BETWEEN READING 1 AND READING 2.
AS A MATTER OF FACT, OUR ARCHITECT WAS WORKING LAST WEEK ON
MAKING THOSE THAT ARE DENOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
AND WITH REGARD TO THE WAIVER, AGAIN, THE 2-KMART IS NOT THE
SAME.
EVEN THOUGH THE SIGN SAYS BAR, SIGNAGE IS GOING TO CHANGE, I
PROMISE.
SO THESE ARE NOT ONLY THAT, BUT THE APPLICANT IS HERE, HAS A
HISTORY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA WITH ALCOHOL AND SPECIAL
BEVERAGE LEASES, THEY HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE PATRONS, AND
THEY HAVE BEEN APPROVED BEFORE.
SO WITH THAT WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE WAIVER UNDER THE 27-132 CRITERIA, AND ALLOW US
TO MOVE FORWARD TO THE SECOND READING WHEN WE CAN MAKE THE
MINOR CORRECTIONS TO THE SITE PLAN THAT THE STAFF REPORT
OUTLINED.
WITH THAT, COUNCIL, I WILL YIELD MY TIME AND ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
8:33:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
COUNCILMAN GUDES?
8:33:16PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I KNOW IT'S INDOORS BUT ANY AMPLIFIED

SOUND, ANY MUSIC?
8:33:25PM >> SORRY.
THIS IS THE APPLICANT.
STATE YOUR NAME.
8:33:28PM >> RYAN FISH-AX, HOLMES AVENUE, TAMPA.
NONE PLANNED.
WE DO HAVE INDOORS SPEAKERS.
8:33:40PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
FINAL QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
YOU TALK ABOUT THE RESTAURANT HOURS.
8:33:47PM >> WE ARE LOOKING AT FIVE TO MIDNIGHT, POSSIBLY OPEN FOR
LUNCH DOWN THE ROAD.
8:33:54PM >> AND IF I MAY, COUNCILMAN, ON THE HOURS, IN THE STAFF
REPORT IT DOES ADDRESS THE HOURS AND WE MEAT THE APPLICABLE
CODE.
8:34:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
THIS?
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA TO CLOSE.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:34:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE AB 2-22-04.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE S 2 FOR ALCOHOLIC

BEVERAGE SALES RESTAURANT CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY AND
MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AT OR FROM THAT
CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 1724 NORTH
NEBRASKA AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR
PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:34:59PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
8:35:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT IS WITH THE WAIVER?
8:35:03PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES, SIR.
8:35:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO MIRANDA,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
8:35:08PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:35:14PM >>THE CLERK:
VIERA?
VIERA?
VIERA?
8:35:22PM >>LUIS VIERA:
OH, YES, YES, YES.
8:35:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:35:25PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
8:35:26PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:35:27PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:35:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:35:28PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022ALITY 9:30 A.M.

8:35:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10.
FILE AB 2, 22-16.
8:35:41PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10, AB 2, 22-16, IS BEING REQUESTING A
SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A SMALL VENUE, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR
CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AT THE LOCATION 1802 AND 1804 EAST
4th AVENUE.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE HERE TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE EAST 4th.
TO THE NORTH YOU WILL HAVE EAST 5th AND 6th, ALSO TO
THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE NORTH 19th STREET, AND TO THE
WEST YOU WILL HAVE NORTH 17th STREET HERE IN THE YBOR
DISTRICT.
THE SITE IS ZONED YC-7.
THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR RETAIL SALES.
THE PROPERTY HAS AN AREA OF 13,406 SQUARE FEET OR .31 ACRES.
THE AB SALES AREA IS 998 SQUARE FEET INDOORS, AND 3,666
SQUARE FEET OUTDOORS FOR A TOTAL AB SALES AREA OF 4,664
SQUARE FEET.
I WILL SHARE THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE ACCESS COMES FROM THE ALLEY TO THE NORTH.
THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE SITE IS FIVE PARKING SPACES AND
THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING TWO PARKING SPACES HERE.
THERE IS ONE WAIVER BEING REQUESTED, AND THAT IS FOR THE

PARKING.
THE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE PARKING FROM FIVE SPACES TO TWO
SPACES, THAT'S A 60% REDUCTION.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH.
ELEVATION FROM THE EAST.
ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
AND ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH.
AND I WAS AT THE SITE, TOOK A PICTURE.
FIRST A PICTURE OF THE SITE ITSELF.
ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE SITE.
THIS IS FROM THE WEST SIDE.
A PICTURE OF THE SITE FROM THE SOUTH.
A PICTURE HERE FROM THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE.
YOU WILL SEE NORTH AND SOUTH, MORE YBOR.
YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL
AND YOU ALSO HAVE INDUSTRIAL.
THAT'S TO THE SOUTH.
AND ANOTHER PICTURE TO THE SOUTH.
THIS WOULD BE THE PROPERTY WEST OF THIS PROPERTY.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,

THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS BETWEEN THE FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
YES, SIR.
8:40:15PM >> COUNCILMAN GUDES.
8:40:17PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IS THIS A STRAIGHT BAR OR IS THIS GOING TO
BE A RESTAURANT/BAR?
8:40:23PM >> THIS IS RETAIL SALES.
8:40:24PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IT'S GOING TO BE RETAIL SALES?
8:40:27PM >> YES, SIR.
8:40:28PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
TALKING ABOUT BEER, CRAFT BREWERY?
WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?
8:40:32PM >> RETAIL.
8:40:35PM >> YEAH, RETAIL SALES.
8:40:37PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I WILL HEAR FROM TYLER.
8:40:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PETITIONER?
8:40:47PM >>TYLER HUDSON:
400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
I BELIEVE THERE'S A PowerPoint CUED UP.
LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU SEE IT ON YOUR SCREEN.
ZAIN DID A GOOD JOB OF DESCRIBING WHERE WE ARE, IN THE HEART
OF YBOR CITY, HISTORIC DISTRICT, YC-7, WE HAVE ALREADY
RECEIVED A CERTIFICATE FOR FROM THE BARRIO LATINO.
IT'S A BIT OF AN UNUSUAL PROJECT.
WE GET THAT.
SO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE LEFT LABELED DOG PARK IS WHAT IS
CORRECT, IT WOULD BE DOG PARK, FRIEND OF YBOR, INC., WHICH

IS A NONPROFIT STARTED BY DARRYL SHAW, THE OWNER OF THE
EASTERLY ADJACENT PARCEL AS WELL ASSOCIATION THIS IS GOING
TO BE A PRIVATELY OWNED PRIVATELY MANAGED DOG PARK THAT IS
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSET, AND THAT'S WHAT
FRIENDS OF YBOR WAS FOUNDED TO DO, TO PUT THESE TYPES OF
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSETS, OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN YBOR CITY.
ON THE RIGHT, WHY WE ARE HERE THIS EVENING, WE ARE
CONSTRUCTING -- IT'S MEANT TO BE LOOK LIKE A RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURE AND FIT RIGHT IN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT IT'S
GOING TO BE A CAFE, BREAKFAST, LUNCH, BEER/WINE PLACE NOT
JUST FOR FOLKS AT THE DOG PARK BUT THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD,
AND THERE ARE ALSO TWO FAIRLY SMALL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THE
SECOND FLOOR.
SO IT IS TRULY GOING TO BE A MIXED USE BUILDING.
ONE THING TO NOTE, ON NEBRASKA THERE ARE KIND OF BARS THAT
ARE FOR PEOPLE WITH DOGS TO BRING THEIR DOGS, AND ALL BUILT
AROUND.
THAT'S NOT REALLY WHAT THIS IS.
DOGS ARE MORE THAN WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED.
AT THE CAFE, THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD CAFE THAT HAPPENS TO BE
NEXT DOOR TO A DOG PARK THAT'S GOING TO BE PRIVATELY
MANAGED, PRIVATELY OPERATED BUT 100% OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND
THE YBOR COMMUNITY.
TWO ISSUES THAT COUNCIL SOMETIMES HAS QUESTIONS ABOUT,
AMPLIFIED SOUND, WE ARE PROPOSING TO STOP AT 10 P.M. ON

WEDNESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY, 11 THURSDAY THROUGH SATURDAY, AND
IN LIEU OF CHAPTER 14 HOURS, THE SERVICE TO STOP AT 1 A.M.,
EVERY NIGHT OF THE WEEK.
IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE WELL BEFORE THAT, AND THERE'S NO
INTENT TO BRING -- THE MANY OPTIONS FOR NIGHT LIFE ALONG
7th AVENUE, THREE BLOCKS SOUTH OF 4th, BUT IN THE
INTEREST OF FLEXIBILITY WE WANT TO KEEP 1 A.M. AS AN OUTSIDE
CLOSING TIME.
GENERALLY TO A WAIVER THAT YOU CAN SEE ON SCREEN.
THERE ARE TWO PARKING SPACES TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE.
IT IS DIRECTLY SERVED THE TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS THERE.
HOWEVER, WE DO HAVE A TEN-YEAR RECORDED LEASE FOR THREE
PARKING SPACES JUST ACROSS THE STREET.
THE BARRIO LATINO APPROVED A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS.
THAT WAS MENTIONED BUT IT WASN'T TECHNICALLY PRESENTED TO
THEM AS A VARIANCE.
SO THAT'S WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR THE WAIVER.
SO WE ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER.
THERE'S ONLY TWO PARKING SPACES ON-SITE.
HOWEVER, THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS APPROVED THE FORM OF
LEASE.
IT'S ALREADY BEEN RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
THERE'S A TEN-YEAR LEASE FOR THREE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE
LITERALLY ACROSS THE STREET SO THERE ARE FIVE PARKING SPACES
WITHIN LESS THAN A BLOCK.

AND WITH THAT I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
8:44:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PUBLIC
COMMENTS TO THIS?
8:44:24PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
8:44:26PM >> SECOND.
8:44:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO,
SECONDED BY DEMAND GUDES.
8:44:36PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF I COULD MOVE AB 2-22-16.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT S-2 FOR
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE CONSUMPTION ON
PREMISES ONLY AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGES
REGARDLESS OF ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR ON
THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 1802 AND
1804 EAST 4th AVENUE TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR
PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:45:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:45:17PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:45:22PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:45:23PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.

8:45:24PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:45:25PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:45:26PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:45:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:45:28PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:45:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12.
FILE REZ 22-47.
8:45:43PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS IS A PROPOSED REZONING FROM CN AND RS-60 TO PD
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED AT THE LOCATION 1401, 1409,
1411, 1413, AND 1415 EAST 29th AVENUE AND 3510 NORTH
15th STREET.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
8:46:13PM >> DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL
PLANNING TAMPA DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE EAST TAMPA
URBAN VILLAGE.
THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS RAGAN PARK LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY TWO BLOCKS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE
SUBJECT SITE ON EAST 29th AVENUE AND NORTH AVENIDA

PUBLIC DE CUBA, DOWNTOWN TAMPA AND THE UNIVERSITY URBAN
TRANSIT CENTER.
IT IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE
COLOR, SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH
15th STREET AND EAST 29th AVENUE.
YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS A MIXED AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL
USES ALONG 15th STREET AS LONG AS RESIDENTIAL USES IN
THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, OF THE SITE NORTH,
35 DESIGNATION, THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION, THE DESIGNATION RUNS ALONG THIS SEGMENT OF
NORTH 15th STREET AND THEN TRANSITIONS EAST AND WEST TO
THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION, FOUND NO
ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS PORTION OF EAST 29th AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH 13th,
NORTH 16th, EXISTING DENSITY OF 10.97 UNITS PER ACRE.
THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT HAS AN OVERALL DENSITY 136.44 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS COMPARABLE WITH THE DENSITY OF THE
SURROUNDING AREA.
THE APPLICANT IS UTILIZING LAND USE POLICY 5.5.6 IF WAY THE

DENSITY PERMITTED UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION, THE ENTIRE
SITE.
THE PD IS SENSITIVE TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD BY
PROPOSING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS TO THE TRANSITION
BETWEEN AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNIT AND THE
PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS, WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE PD SUPPORTS THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICY BY PROVIDING
SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ACCESS
TOWARD THE SIDEWALK AND STREET.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS RELATES TO HOUSING, THE CITY'S
POPULATION, THE PD PROPOSES ADDITIONAL HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES, EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, THE GREATEST SHARE
OF GROWTH.
THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBILITY TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THIS PORTION OF YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD,
AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
ENCOURAGED UNDER THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING THE PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REQUESTS THE APPLICANT PROVIDE ACREAGE FOR EACH LAND
USE DESIGNATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE AND DELINEATE THE
BOUNDARIES ON THE SITE PLAN.
ALSO, WE WOULD REQUEST THAT LAND USE POLICY 5.1.6.

BASED ON THIS CONSIDERATION THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:49:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. COLLINS?
THANK YOU.
8:49:50PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR THE RECORD AND MAKE A CORRECTION.
THE AGENDA WAS -- THERE IS A MISS TYPE ON THE AGENDA.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM CI AND RS-60 TO PD.
8:50:07PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IS THAT --
8:50:20PM >> CORRECTION.
50 AND CI TO PD.
8:50:23PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THIS IS FOR WHICH CASE NUMBER?
NUMBER 12?
REZ 22-47?
8:50:30PM >> CORRECT.
8:50:31PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AGAIN IT'S FROM -- IS THE ORDINANCE
CORRECT?
8:50:40PM >>THE CLERK:
YES.
8:50:41PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
8:50:42PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
I WILL CONTINUE.
I WILL SHOW IS THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE SITE PLAN.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT MUCH

TWO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS FOR THE FAMILY AND
SINGLE-FAMILY AND 14 RESIDENTIAL SEMI-DETACHED UNITS HERE
AND HERE FOR A TOTAL OF 16 UNITS.
SO THE SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 51,621 SQUARE FEET, OR
APPROXIMATELY 1.19 ACRES.
IT'S COMPRISED OF EAST 29th AVENUE, TO THE NORTH, AND
YOU HAVE NORTH REPUBLICA, AND ALSO YOU HAVE NORTH 15th
STREET.
THE SITE IS SURROUNDED, AS I WILL SHOW YOU THE AERIAL VIEW,
THE SITE HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
THE SITE TO THE NORTH WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND
SEMI-DETACHED USES AND THESE ARE IN THE RS-50 AND RM-16
ZONING DISTRICTS.
THERE'S A VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP IN THE CI DISTRICT, ALSO TO
THE NORTH.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES TO THE WEST IN THE
RS-50.
AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES TO THE SOUTH,
AND THE EAST, IN THE RS-50, AND CI DISTRICTS.
I'LL SHARE THE ELEVATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE NORTH SIDE.
FROM THE EAST.
SOUTH.
AND THE WEST.
YOU WILL SEE THE SEMI-DETACHED UNIT FROM THE NORTH, EAST,

SOUTH, AND WEST.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, TOOK PICTURES.
YOU WILL SEE THE SITE CURRENTLY.
MORE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, ALSO COMMERCIAL.
MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES TO THE NORTH.
TO THE WEST YOU WILL HAVE THE INTERSECTION, 29th AND
NORTH REPUBLICA DE CUBA, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
MULTIFAMILY.
AND FURTHER TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE A CAR DETAIL SHOP.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS.
FIRST, 27-240 TO INCREASE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE
REQUIRED 20 TO 24 FEET, AND MEASURED FROM THE FRONT BUILDING
WALL TO THE GRAND TREE PROTECTION.
SECOND WAIVER 27-283.12 TO ALLOW MANEUVERING IN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PARKING SPACES FOR A MULTIPLE UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITH MORE THAN FOUR UNITS ON THE ZONING LOT, AND
WHERE EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ARE GREATER THAN 1500 VEHICLES
PER DAY ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAY.
NOW, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING AS PER THE REVISION SHEET.

8:55:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
PETITIONER?
THERE'S ONE MORE MEMBER OF STAFF?
SHE HAS BEEN WAITING PATIENTLY.
8:56:04PM >> DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THERE IS ON THE RECORD, THERE IS ONE WAIVER TO REMOVE A
GRAND TREE, A 40-INCH LAUREL OAK RATED C-7.
THAT'S IT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HERE.
8:56:20PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN WE SEE THAT?
DO YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF IT, OF THE TREE?
8:56:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IF I MAY ASK THE QUESTION, PLEASE.
WHAT KIND OF TREE IS IT?
8:56:38PM >> IT'S A LAUREL OAK 40-INCH LAUREL OAK.
8:56:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
C 7?
8:56:45PM >> C 7.
8:56:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HOW OLD WOULD YOU SPECULATE IT IS?
8:56:50PM >> IT'S PROBABLY 40, 50 YEARS OLD.
8:56:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND THEY LIVE TO 70?
8:56:54PM >> YES.
8:56:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
8:57:03PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT, LAND DEVELOPMENT
AND PLANNING FOR DOMAIN HOMES, LOCATED 5815 SOUTH MACDILL
AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33611.

I DO HAVE A PETITION FROM SOME OF THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS
AROUND THE BLOCK, THAT WE HAD SIGNED AND PROPERTY TO THE
SITE PLAN WITH COLORS AND WHERE THE GRAND TREES ARE LOCATED.
8:57:25PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
FOR THE RECORD.
THE DOT REPRESENTS THE PEOPLE THAT SIGNED THE PETITION.
THE SMALL DO IT REPRESENTS THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH ALONG
WITH SCAGLIONE WHO I HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH.
THERE WAS A DANGEROUS TREE ACTUALLY.
SO IT WAS DROPPING LIMBS ON HER PROPERTY AND I JUST HAD THAT
REMOVED WITH THE CITY'S APPROVAL.
I WASN'T ABLE TO GET BACK WITH HER. ANYWAY, YOU CAN SEE THE
PATTERN OF THE ZONING.
YOU WILL SEE THE LAND USE AS WELL, AS MR. COLLINS MENTIONED.
YOU SEE THE CC-35.
AND AS MENTIONED IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION IT WAS 35 UNIT PER ACRE, IN THE FLESH COLORED
R-10, ALLOWS TO US SPREAD THE DENSITY BY THE CALCULATIONS OF
THIS PARTICULAR ACREAGE WE WOULD BE ALLOWED 18 UNITS
POTENTIALLY.
WE ARE ONLY SEEKING 16.
AND THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW YOU.
ONE ADDITIONAL MAP I WANTED TO SHARE WITH YOU IS THE
EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN, AND THIS IS FROM THE PLANNING
COMMISSION, FEMA MAPPING WEBSITE, THE CODES, THIS IS THE
PROPERTY IN THE CENTER, AND ALTHOUGH AS IN THE ZONING AND

THE LAND USE, PRETTY SOLID BLOCKS OF R-10, RS-50 SURROUNDING
THE CORRIDOR, YOU WILL NOTICE THERE'S MUCH MORE A SMATTERING
OF USES TO FAMILY USES THROUGHOUT THE SINGLE-FAMILY, WHAT IS
SUPPOSED TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING.
THERE ARE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS THROUGHOUT, AS WELL AS
INSTITUTIONAL AND LIGHT COMMERCIAL STRETCHING INTO AND
BEYOND THE CORRIDOR AND THIS LARGE DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST
IS BELMONT HEIGHTS.
I GO TO THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE COLOR TO GIVE YOU A
BETTER INDICATION OF GREEN VERSUS BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
IT IS A VERY LARGE PARCEL ALONG 29th.
WHAT WE HAVE FOR ANCHORING THE TWO SIDES, THE TWO CORNERS
ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND THEN PUTTING IN THE TOWNHOUSE
STYLE DETACHED IN BETWEEN.
THE ONE WAIVER WE DO HAVE FOR THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS THE
PRESERVE WITH PREDOMINANT LAUREL OAK HERE WITH THE GRAND
TREE.
THIS TREE IN THE CENTER RIGHT HERE IS THE ONE THAT IS
ACTUALLY THE 40-INCH C-7 LAUREL OAK.
ALMOST HAZARDOUS IF YOU GO THROUGH THE RATINGS.
AS A C-7.
LOOKING AT THE POSITION OF THE BUILDINGS, WE DID TRY TO PUSH
AND PULL THE BUILDINGS EVERY WHICH WAY WE COULD TO ACTUALLY
SAVE THAT TREE.
HOWEVER, THERE ARE A FEW DEFECTS IN IT THAT ALSO MADE IT A

LITTLE DIFFICULT, LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY.
WE ALSO WANTED TO TRY TO PRESERVE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHICH
WE WERE ABLE TO DO, THE EAST TAMPA SIDE YARD SETBACKS
BETWEEN 5 AND 6 FEET, FROM 10 TO 12 FEET BETWEEN THE
BUILDINGS.
THESE BUILDINGS ARE SIZED TO A LARGER SINGLE-FAMILY STYLE
HOUSE, 40 FEET WIDE TO 20 FEET FOR EACH UNIT.
THEY HAVE 1489 SQUARE FEET OF LIVING.
1780 INCLUDING THE GARAGE.
AND THEN THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON THE SIDE ARE JUST SHY OF
A FEW HUNDRED SQUARE FEET LIVING AND 1500 SQUARE FEET WITH
THE GARAGE.
IN THIS REAR YARD BACK HERE, THERE IS A SMALL -- IT'S NOT
SMALL, ACTUALLY SHALLOW RETENTION AREA.
IN ORDER TO NOT PLANTED LAND OR NOT PLATTED LOTS HERE SO WE
HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS.
IT'S A THE CITY RULES THAT ARE IN PLACE WE FOLLOW COMMERCIAL
STANDARDS FOR STORMWATER, EVEN THOUGH WHAT WOULD NORMALLY BE
A TYPICAL SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.
SO UNDER THE STORMWATER PROVISIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL, WE
WILL HAVE TO CREATE A SPECIFIC PLACE TO CAPTURE WATER,
ALTHOUGH EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT MEASURES THE TYPICAL LOT SIZE
THAT EAST TAMPA LOT WOULD HAVE AND WE WILL BE USING OUR
STANDARD DOWN SOUTH MAYBE AS HIGH, TREAT EACH LOT AS A STAND
ALONE LOT FOR STORMWATER AS WE NORMALLY WOULD, NOT REQUIRED

FOR STORMWATER -- OR SUBDIVISION.
WE DID GET AN INDICATION ALSO PRELIMINARILY THAT WE WILL
HAVE TO DO A WATER MAIN EXTENSION ALONG 29th, SO WE WILL
BE PUTTING IN A 6-INCH LINE AS WELL.
WE ARE PRESERVING TWO ADDITIONAL GRAND TREES BACK HERE AND
THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT IN THE STAFF REVISION SHEET
TO SHIFT THIS DRIVEWAY NORTH JUST A LITTLE BIT.
THESE ARE TWO PALM TREES, A 3-FOOT PROTECTIVE RADIUS, SO WE
WILL BE PULLING THAT A LITTLE TO THE NORTH TO PRESERVE THOSE
TREES.
WE WILL BE REDOING THE SIDEWALKS ON ALL SIDES.
PER CITY STANDARDS.
AND AS MENTIONED, THESE ARE THE FRONTS OF THE TWO
SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
AND THEN THIS IS ONE STYLE OF THE SEMI-DETACHED TOWNHOMES,
THE ARCHED ENTRANCES AND THE TRELLISES AND THE SHUTTERS.
AND THEN THIS IS THE OTHER ONE, WHICH IS MORE OF KIND OF A
BARN HOUSE STYLE.
WE BUILT JUST A FEW OF THESE SO FAR.
THEY ARE NEW IN OUR REPERTOIRE.
THIS ONE IS JUST FINISHING UP.
THE LIGHT FIXTURES STILL NEED TO GO IN.
ORNAMENTATION PIECES.
BUT THIS IS A DEAD-END STREET ACTUALLY, FACES I-4 ON
15th AVENUE JUST SOUTH OF COLUMBUS.

THEY SOLD IMMEDIATELY.
I THINK THEY SOLD AROUND 279.
THESE ARE OBTAINABLE.
WE ALSO HAVE EIGHT OF THESE UNITS GOING ON AT 34th AND
LOUISIANA, ALL FOR 329 AND 349.
AND THESE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE APPROXIMATELY AROUND THAT
SAME PRICE POINT, MAINLY FOR FAMILIES IN THE AREA.
WE AGREE WITH ALL OF THE STAFF'S REVISIONS AND WE ARE HAPPY
TO MAKE THEM BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
9:04:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:

9:05:01PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU PUT OPPORTUNITY SITE PLAN AGAIN?
THOSE ARE 12 DRIVEWAYS.
IS THERE A REASON YOU COULDN'T HAVE PUT THEM IN THE BACK?
9:05:17PM >> THESE DRIVEWAYS ARE ACTUALLY THE SAME WIDTH OF THE
STANDARD SINGLE-FAMILY DRIVE DRIVEWAY.
9:05:25PM >> I KNOW, BUT IF YOU LOOK THERE AREN'T 12 DRIVEWAYS ON ANY
NEIGHBORING BLOCK.
AND I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU CAN'T PUT -- THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM
BEHIND, AND THEN ASK FOR THE SETBACK WAIVER INSTEAD.
I'M JUST NOT SURE WHY THIS SORT OF STUFF KEEPS HAPPENING.
9:05:48PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
TO PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE, THIS IS 100
FEET DEEP HERE, RIGHT?
PUTTING THE DRIVEWAYS IN THE REAR, THE MINIMUM STANDARD FOR
PRIVATE ROAD THAT GOES THROUGH A SUBDIVISION IS 35 FEET.

SO WE ONLY HAVE 65 FEET LEFT WITH THAT ROAD RUNNING BEHIND
US.
THERE'S ALSO, QUITE HONESTLY, THE ECONOMIC, THIS WATER MAIN
EXTENSION, WE ARE LITERALLY FINISHING ONE ON 15th WITH
THE OTHER UNITS AND IT'S 130,000 AND THAT'S ONLY A 4-INCH
LINE.
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE THE EXTENSIVE IF NOT MORE HERE WITH ALL
THE LATERALS.
WE COULD BRING ALL OF THAT INTO THIS LOCATION.
THAT'S FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE.
SO IF YOU WERE TO UTILIZE THIS SITE AS IS, UNDER CURRENT
ZONING, YOU WOULD GET MAYBE SIX, MAYBE SEVEN UNITS, BUT THE
COMMERCIAL PIECE, UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR IT.
SO WITH ALL OF THAT EXPENSE TO DEVELOP THIS LAND YOU HAVE TO
BE ABLE TO DEVELOP IN SOME TYPE OF DENSITY AND GET SOME
USABLE YARDS.
THESE ARE TYPICALLY SINGLE FAMILIES.
THE PEOPLE THAT BOUGHT OUR OTHER UNITS ARE SINGLE MOMS,
SINGLE DADS, COUPLES WITH YOUNG CHILDREN JUST GETTING THEIR
FIRST HOME.
I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION WITH THE ROAD BEHIND AND THE
ACCESS, BUT AT THE SAME TIME THESE DRIVEWAYS ARE 20 FEET
WIDE WITH TWO DRIVEWAYS, THE SAME AS ANY SINGLE-FAMILY
HOUSE.
THE IMPACT OF THAT STREET IS NO MORE THAN SEVEN HOMES, AND

THESE ACTUALLY SIDE TO SIDE.
I WOULD SAY FOR THESE PEOPLE THAT GOING TO LIVE HERE, IT'S
MORE BENEFICIAL FOR THEM TO ACTUALLY HAVE GREEN SPACE AND
YARDS TO PLAY IN THAN IT WOULD BE TO HAVE PAVEMENT BEHIND
THEM, MY PERSONAL OPINION.
9:07:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
THIS?
9:07:46PM >> I'M BELINDA STEADY, 1404 EAST 28TH AVENUE, AND I
APPRECIATE KATHERINE TALKING GETTING THAT TREE REMOVED.
THIS IS MY PROPERTY -- RIGHT HERE.
MY PROPERTY IS RIGHT HERE.
SO MY CONCERN BESIDES THE DENSITY, WHICH I UNDERSTAND THAT
THEY HAVE TO MAKE A PROFIT, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF HOUSES
THERE.
MY CONCERN IS THIS AREA RIGHT HERE, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A
HUGE POND THERE.
IT'S GOING TO BE ATTRACTING MOSQUITOES.
NINE OF US RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY THERE AND ALL OF US ARE
GOING TO HAVE A POOL OF MOSQUITOES AND DEBRIS AND ALL SORTS
OF PROBLEMS WITH THAT.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND ALL THE LOGISTICS ABOUT WHY THIS HAS TO
BE DONE AND WHY IT HAS TO BE DONE, BUT TO ME, THIS IS A VERY
BIG -- MY ENTIRE BACKYARD IS GOING TO BE COVERED WITH THIS
RETENTION POND, AND I ENJOY GOING OUT THERE AND ENJOY THE

OUTDOORS, AND NOW I AM GOING TO BE AFRAID OF GOING OUT THERE
AND GETTING EATEN UP BY MOSQUITOES AND OTHER DEBRIS AND
THINGS THAT FALL DOWN.
ALTHOUGH THIS HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR A
WHILE, IF YOU SAW THE PICTURES, THIS WHOLE AREA HAS BEEN A
HUGE MESS FOR A LONG, LONG TIME WHICH I AM GRATEFUL THAT'S
GOING TO BE CLEANED UP, BUT AT THE SAME TIME ALL OF THIS
TIME THAT THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN LIKE THIS, I HAVE BEEN
DEALING WITH THANK TREE THAT FINALLY GOT REMOVED, THAT COULD
HAVE KILLED MY GRANDDAUGHTER, AND ALL OF THIS STUFF THAT'S
BACK THERE, THEY SAY I GUESS IT'S GOING TO BE AN HOA.
I DON'T KNOW.
WHO IS GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO CLEAN THAT RETENTION POND?
RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S SAFE BACK THERE?
IS IT GOING TO BE -- KID PLAYING BACK THERE, ARE THEY GOING
TO GO INTO THE POND?
THEN THAT'S THE PROBLEM OF WHO IS GOING TO MAKE IT CLEAN?
WHO IS GOING TO KEEP IT FROM DEBRIS, NOT ONLY FROM THE TREES
BUT JUST EVERY DAY ACCESS AND THEN THE WATER.
WE HAVE OUR RAINS EVERY DAY SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF
WATER IN THAT AREA, AND IT'S A HUGE SPACE, AS KATHERINE
POINTED OUT TO YOU.
SO I WOULD KINDLY REQUEST THAT SOMETHING BE DONE TO READJUST
THIS AREA SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE SUCH A LARGE RETENTION POND,
IF THERE HAS TO BE ONE, IS IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE TAKEN OUT SO

MUCH OF THE LAND THAT THERE'S NOWHERE FOR THE WATER TO GO
AND NOW THE CITY IS REQUIRING THEM TO PUT THIS BACK THERE?
DOES THAT MEAN IT MIGHT BE ONE OR TWO TO BE ELIMINATED?
I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER.
ALL I KNOW IS THAT I APPRECIATE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE
DONE, AND IT'S GOING TO IMPROVE THE AREA, BUT AT THE SAME
TIME, IT'S GOING TO BE A BUG HEADACHE FOR ME AND THE REST OF
THE NEIGHBORS WHO ARE THERE, PLUS PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO BE
MOVING IN.
I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU.
9:10:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANYONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS COMMENTS?
PETITIONER, YOU HAVE REBUTTAL.
9:11:02PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
CATHERINE COYLE AGAIN.
THIS RETENTION AREA, AND THAT'S THE REASON WHY THE RETENTION
AREA IS -- BECAUSE THE DRAINAGE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE
RETAINED AND CONVEYED FROM EACH LOT.
UNFORTUNATELY, MENTIONED BECAUSE THE WAY THE SUBDIVISION
RULES AND THE STORMWATER RULES WORKED, EVEN IF I WANTED TO
CARVE IT UP AND PULL THESE LOTS ALL THE WAY BACK AND BELONG
TO EACH ONE, I WOULD STILL HAVE TO CREATE A COMMON RETENTION
AREA, EVEN IF THIS WAS JUST NINE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND
STILL REQUIRED TO DO THAT, BECAUSE THIS LAND HAS NOT BEEN
SUBDIVIDED.

THAT IS THE CURRENT PROCEDURE UNDER THE CITY RULES.
9:11:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
9:11:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
BUT A RETENTION AREA HOLDS WATER, DOES IT
NOT?
9:11:53PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
IT CAN, BUT IT DEPENDS ON THE STORM AND
IT DEPENDS ON THE ELEVATION, BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO HOLD IT
FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.
THIS IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE MAYBE ONE FOOT DEEP AT THE
CENTER, BUT IT'S GOING TO MEANDER AROUND THESE TREES.
WE CAN'T GO INTO THE PROTECTIVE RADIUS OF THESE TREES.
9:12:13PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
AND IT'S AN HOA SUBDIVISION?
9:12:24PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO A SUBDIVISION, YES,
BECAUSE THE LAND IS NOT PLATTED CURRENTLY.
IN REALITY WE COULD COME IN AND DO ONE HOUSE HERE AND ONE
HOUSE ON THIS ENTIRE LOT AND NOT HAVE TO SUB IT BUT THAT'S
LITERALLY --
9:12:42PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YOU KNOW, WHEN I SEE SOME OF THE
DEVELOPMENTS LIKE A BUNCH OF SARDINES, PACKED IN THERE, AND
IN YEARS PAST I JUST KNOW -- AND HOPEFULLY -- SOMETIMES
THESE DEVELOPMENTS TURN INTO WHAT I CALL LITTLE PROPERTIES,
AND HURTS NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S MY OPINION.
9:13:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THAT THE END OF YOUR REBUTTAL?
9:13:12PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
YES, IF IT PLEASES COUNCIL, I CAN
CERTAINLY GO BACK AND TAKE AN EXTRA COUPLE WEEKS AND LOOK AT
THE LAYOUT AGAIN.

WE HAVE LAID IT OUT AS N AS MANY WAYS AS WE POSSIBLY CAN TO
SEE THE TREES UNDER THE CURRENT REGULATIONS THAT WE HAVE FOR
SUBDIVISION AND STORMWATER.
AND AS I MENTIONED, BECAUSE THIS ISN'T PLATTED, YOU
LITERALLY CAN HAVE ONE HOUSE ON ALMOST THIS ENTIRE LOT AND
THAT'S ALL YOU CAN ACTUALLY DO WITHOUT TRIGGERING THE OTHER
RULES.
SO WE ARE KIND OF STUCK IN THAT PROCEDURAL LIMBO.
AS FAR AS PATTERN, AS FAR AS DENSITY AND LAYOUT, THIS
ACTUALLY FOLLOWS THE PATTERN IN THE AREA.
I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME.
9:14:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THERE ANY COMMENT OR QUESTIONS?
9:14:05PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF THE APPLICANT SAYS SHE WANTS MORE
TIME, I'M NOT AGAINST IT.
IN FACT, MR. SCAGLIONE DID CALL THE OFFICE LAST WEEK AND
GAVE ME THREE ERRANDS AND I HAVE TO GO DO THEM.
THREE OF THEM.
THIS IS ONE OF THEM.
AND IT WAS ABOUT THE TREE.
AND WHEN I GOT THERE, THEY WERE CUTTING THE LIMB OVER
PROPERTY THAT MS. SCAGLIONE WAS TALKING ABOUT.
I BELIEVE I TOOK SOME PICTURES WITH MY PHONE.
I KNOW HE HAD THREE TRUCKS.
ONE WAS A BIG BOOM TAKING THAT TREE OUT.
THE LIMBS, ANYWAY.

9:14:45PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
WE JUST HAD TO WAIT FOR THE CITY'S OKAY
ON IT.
9:14:48PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I SAW THAT.
9:14:50PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
UNFORTUNATELY THE COULD TACKET THAT MS.
SCAGLIONE HAD IS NO LONGER WITH DOMAIN.
I'M GLAD SHE GOT AHOLD OF ME.
9:14:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MARY GAVE ME TWO OTHERS.
MIGHT AS WELL SAY IT NOW.
WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER IS THAT NO MATTER IF YOU HAVE TWO OR
THREE LESS HOUSES, YOU STILL HAVE TO HAVE THAT POND BACK
THERE, WHATEVER YOU CALL THEM?
9:15:14PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
WE STILL HAVE TO PROVIDE STORMWATER
RETENTION AREA, AND WE STILL HAVE TOPPING GO THROUGH THE
SUBDIVISION PROCESS.
WE WILL STILL HAVE TO DO A WATER MAIN EXTENSION.
THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION COMMENT THAT WE GOT WAS WHEN WE
FIRST LOOKED AT THIS AND THOUGHT IF WE JUST DO
SINGLE-FAMILY, WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL FOR THAT?
AND THEN WE TRIED DIFFERENT SCENARIOS.
IT WAS A SIX-INCH WATER MAIN EXTENSION AND THE STORMWATER
POND IN THE SAME LOCATION, BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY PLACE
BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE LOT IS SHAPED.
FOR 7 OR 8 HOUSES.
SO THE ECONOMICS ARE REALLY TOUGH ON THIS PARTICULAR LOT.
9:15:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD PRETTY WELL.

I GREW UP AROUND THERE.
AND IT'S COMING BACK LITTLE BY LITTLE.
9:16:01PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
AND I WILL SAY THE NEIGHBORS, I SPOKE
WITH THE ONES THAT WERE THERE, AND THEY WERE VERY
ENTHUSIASTIC.
MR. CAMPBELL THAT FACES 15th, LONG-TIME WITH THE CASPER
COMPANY, HE WAS AMAZING TO TALK TO.
THE ONE THAT LIVES ON THE CORNER DIRECTLY ACROSS.
WILLEY WHO LIVES DIRECTLY ACROSS IN THE DUPLEX.
THEY WERE EXTREMELY EXCITED TO HAVE SOMETHING HAPPEN.
AND THEY LOVED THE ELEVATIONS.
9:16:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
9:16:36PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I AM NOT COMPLAINING BECAUSE THE AREA
NEEDS A LOOK.
A LOT OF THOSE HOMES, THE LEVEL OF CARE FOR THOSE FOLKS THAT
ARE OLDER TO REHAB THEIR PROPERTIES, TO BRING IT BACK.
SO I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT.
THAT'S NOT MY ISSUE.
JUST PLATTED OR NON-PLATTED.
9:17:03PM >>CATHERINE COYLE:
OFFICIALLY THE LAND HAS NOT BEEN CARVED
UP LEGALLY AND RECORDED LOT BY LOT ON ADJACENT BLOCKS WHERE
YOU WOULD HAVE 24 PLATTED LOTS ON A BLOCK.
THIS IS JUST A COUPLE BIG PARCELS OF LAND.
9:17:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.
9:17:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.

SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
9:17:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 1401, 1409, 1411, 1413 AND 1415 EAST 29th
AVENUE AND 3510 NORTH 15th STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, SEMI-DETACHED, AND DETACHED,
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9:18:02PM >> SECOND.
9:18:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
9:18:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.
9:18:15PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
9:18:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
9:18:19PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
9:18:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
9:18:23PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
9:18:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.

9:18:25PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK AND MIRANDA A
VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON
OCTOBER 20, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
9:18:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION FOR NUMBER 13, REZ 22-51.
9:18:40PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS IS FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS 6202 INTERBAY BOULEVARD AND
6001 SOUTH MARTINDALE AVENUE, PROPOSED REZONING FROM CN OR
RS-60 TO PD, PLANNED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO DANNY COLLINS.
9:19:02PM >> DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,
MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH THE SOUTH OF GANDY NEIGHBORHOOD.
SKY VIEW PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY
LOCATED A QUARTER MILE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SITE IS NOT WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION
ZONE, AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE MacDILL AIR
FORCE FLIGHT PATH WHICH LIMITS DEVELOPMENT OF TEN DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTY.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT'S GENERALLY SOUTHWEST OF THE MARTINDALE AVENUE AND
INTERBAY BOULEVARD INTERSECTION.

PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL USE AS LONG THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG
INTERBAY WITH LIGHT COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
THERE'S SOME VACANT LAND TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS
WELL AS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE SOUTH.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED AS RESIDENTIAL 20
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
R-20 TO THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
R-10 TO THE WEST.
AND WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION.
IT IS WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATH AND IS LIMITED TO TEN DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND
NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
SOUTH MARTINDALE AVENUE, WHICH IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE,
CONTAINS RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATED PARCELS.
THEY ARE BEING UTILIZED FOR MULTIPLE WITH ATTACHED
SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
NORTH OF INTERBAY TO THE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD
WITH R-10 DESIGNATED PARCELS THAT ARE ORIENTED INTERNALLY TO
THE SOUTH 6th STREET.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FIND THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE TO
THE EXISTING DENSITY AND FOUND IN THE SURROUNDING AREA AND
COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES.
SIDEWALKS DO NOT CURRENTLY EXIST ALONG SOUTH MARTINDALE

AVENUE, INTERBAY AND SOUTH 6th STREET.
THE PD PROPOSES 5-FOOT SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE SITE ALONG
SOUTH MARTINDALE AVENUE AND INTERBAY.
THE APPLICANT DID NOT PROVIDE A SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
SITE ALONG SOUTH 6th STREET AND THE DEVELOPER WILL MAKE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 6th STREET, REPAVING AND WIDENING OF THE
ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK AND STREET WEIGHS.
ALONG ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL HELP ENSURE SIDEWALK
INTERCONNECT WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE SIDEWALKS ON ADJACENT
PARCELS.
IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST WILL MAINTAIN STABILITY OF
EXISTING AREAS, WHILE EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING
CHOICES IN SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THIS PORTION
OF INTERBAY SOUTH OF GANDY BOULEVARD, CONSISTENT WITH
NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERN ENCOURAGED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND WITHIN THE MacDILL AIR
FORCE FLIGHT PATH.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THE SITE DATA TABLE AND
ACKNOWLEDGE THE SITE IS WITHIN THE SITE PLAN ON THE SITE
PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS.
BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATION IT IS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
9:22:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
9:22:41PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE SITE PLAN.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
PROPERTY FOR FIVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
YOU SEE ALL FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY.
THE PROPERTY IS CONTAINING A LOT AREA OF 38,951 SQUARE FEET,
OR .087 ACRES IN SIZE.
THE LOT IS CURRENTLY VACANT AT THIS TIME.
ENCOMPASSED TO THE NORTH INTERBAY, TO THE WEST YOU HAVE
6th STREET AND TO THE EAST YOU HAVE SOUTH MARTINDALE
AVENUE.
CLOSE TO THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE EACH RESIDENCE HAS TWO-CAR
GARAGE.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED CN.
ALSO DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND RESTAURANT
USES.
TO THE SOUTH ARE ZONED RS-60.
THIS IS DEVELOPED FOR A CLUB.
THE LOT TO THE WEST IS ZONED RS-60.
THE LOT IS ZONED R 60 AND DEVELOPED FOR A DAYCARE, AND LOTS
TO THE EAST ZONED RM-16 AND RM 06 AND THEY ARE DEVELOPED FOR
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCES.
I WILL SHOW YOU WE HAVE LOT 1, HAS A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 8,925

SQUARE FEET.
LOT 2, 7,294 SQUARE FEET.
LOT 3, 7,563 SQUARE FEET.
LOT 4, 7,598 SQUARE FEET.
LOT 5, 7,571 SQUARE FEET.
THE SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE 20 FEET.
SOUTH 10 FEET.
EAST 5 FEET.
AND WEST 5 FEET.
THE MAXIMUM PROPOSED HEIGHT IS FOR 30 FEET IN HEIGHT.
NO WAIVERS ARE BEING REQUESTED.
I WILL SHARE THE OVERHEAD AERIAL VIEW.
YOU SEE THE PARCEL HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
AS -- THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT AS YOU WILL SEE IN THE
PICTURE.
YOU SEE TO THE NORTHEAST, YOU WILL SEE THE TEE-PEE TACO AND
A RESTAURANT DOWN THE WAY, SEAFOOD RESTAURANT.
TO THE NORTH YOU WILL HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
MULTIFAMILY HOUSES.
TO THE NORTHEAST YOU WILL HAVE MORE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY.
TO THE WEST YOU WILL HAVE COMMERCIAL RES RESTAURANT AND
RESIDENCE.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND

FIND THE OVERALL QUARTERBACK TO BE CONSISTENT IT WITH THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE PROJECT, THE
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROVISIONS AS PER THE REVISION SHEET
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
9:26:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
QUESTIONS?
PETITIONER?
9:26:48PM >> GOOD EVENING.
CAN YOU HEAR ME?
9:27:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE CAN HEAR YOU BUT CAN'T SEE YOU.
9:27:11PM >> I'M SO SORRY.
9:27:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE NEED TO SEE YOU.
9:27:17PM >> CAN YOU SEE ME?
9:27:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO, WE CANNOT.
9:27:23PM >> I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY.
9:27:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE NEED TO SEE YOU, SIR.
9:27:37PM >> I AM VERY SORRY ABOUT THAT.
9:27:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. CHAIRMAN, IS HE ON A DESKTOP, A
LAPTOP?
9:28:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SIR, ARE YOU ON YOUR LAPTOP OR DESKTOP?
9:28:03PM >> IF I MAY USE THE PHONE IF YOU DON'T MIND.
9:28:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT WILL NOT WORK.
YOU NEED TO BE ON A COMPUTER OR TABLET.
9:28:16PM >> I AM ON THE COMPUTER ALREADY.

9:28:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
TURN THE CAMERA ON, PLEASE.
9:28:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL RIGHT.
WE WILL MOVE ONTO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM.
SIR, WE WILL HAVE T&I WORK WITH YOU, OKAY?
9:28:38PM >> I UNDERSTAND.
THANK YOU.
9:28:40PM >> AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 17.
FILE 22-72.
9:28:52PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSED REZONING FROM PD TO PD, OFFICE, BUSINESS
PROFESSIONAL, RETAIL SALES, RESTAURANT, BAR/LOUNGE AND
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, AT THE LOCATION 2907 WEST BAY TO
BAY AND FOLIO NUMBER 127,083.0000.
I WILL PASS ALONG TO DANNY COLLINS.
9:29:15PM >> DANNY COLLINS AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, AND
MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE BAYSHORE GARDENS NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATION FACILITY BEING LOCATED .2
MILES SNORT EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER
OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG WEST BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD.
THE STOP IS SERVED BY HART ROUTE 14 PROVIDING THE PLAZA.
SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE AND ALSO --
9:29:57PM >> HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING

PROPERTIES, OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR, ONE BLOCK WEST OF
BAYSHORE BOULEVARD.
AND JUST HEADING EAST OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE LAND USE 35 DESIGNATION.
DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS I THINK THAT'S
THE RS-50 DESIGNATION.
CMU 35 TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THEN R-35 IS TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
PLANNING SARASOTA COMMISSION STAFF FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS
TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE PD PROPOSES A F.A.R. UNDER THE CMU-35 DESIGNATION.
SURROUNDING PARCELS ARE RE-3 OR 50 AND RESIDENTIAL 35, WHICH
ALL ANTICIPATE A MEDIUM TO HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
AS SUCH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
THE PD ADDRESSES SEVERAL OF THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES,
SIDEWALKS ARE PRESENT ALONG ALL ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND
CONNECTIONS ARE PROVIDED F.FEASIBLE, PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REQUESTS THAT BETWEEN 1 AND 2 ACROSS SOUTH ISABELLA
AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS.
THIS REVISION WILL HELP MAKE SURE THE SIDEWALKS INTERCONNECT
WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE SIDEWALKS ON THE PROPERTY.
IN CONCLUSION THE PROPOSED PD REZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR

DEVELOPMENT THAT'S COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS CONSISTENT WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CMU-35
DESIGNATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDE PI PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
9:31:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
9:31:56PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
PROPERTY WITH OFFICE, BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL, RETAIL SALES, A
RESTAURANT, BAR AND LOUNGE, AND RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
USES.
THE SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 3.56 ACRES OR 155,073 SQUARE
FEET IN SIZE.
TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND
BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES.
ALONG HERE, ALONG TO THE WEST AND NORTH AND SOUTH, YOU WILL
HAVE THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE BAYSHORE BOULEVARD.
TO THE SOUTH YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
AND TO THE NORTH YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL, RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL USES.

I WILL NOW SHARE THE SITE PLAN.
SO THERE'S TWO PARCELS.
YOU HAVE PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 2.
PARCEL 1 INCLUDES AN OFFICE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, AND
RETAIL SALES.
YOU ALSO HAVE THE RESTAURANT HERE, AND ALSO YOU HAVE A
BAR/LOUNGE.
PARCEL ONE IS PROPOSED TO BE 1.82 ACRES OR 79,356 SQUARE
FEET, FOR A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 250 FEET.
SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 15 FEET, SOUTH 5 FEET, EAST 5
FEET, AND WEST 20 FEET.
IT'S PROPOSED TO BE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
THERE ARE 73 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
PARCEL 2 IS 1.74 ACRES OR 75,794 SQUARE FEET, WITH A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 274 FEET WITH 24 STORIES.
THE SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 2 FEET, SOUTH 15 FEET, EAST 5
FEET AND WEST 5 FEET.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
TO THE EAST.
ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH SIDE.
AND THE SOUTH.
AND THEN YOU HAVE THE SECOND BUILDING.
ELEVATION FROM THE EAST.
WEST.

NORTH.
AND SOUTH.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE TOOK PICTURES.
YOU WILL SEE WHAT'S CURRENTLY AT THE SITE.
SIGNS IN THE FRONT.
YOU HAVE THE OFFICE SPACE HERE.
YOU HAVE COUNTER CULTURE RESTAURANT.
THE OFFICE SPACE ON-SITE.
COUNTERCULTURE, BAYSHORE OFFICE.
YOU HAVE THE CONDOMINIUM.
PROPOSED 24 STORIES.
TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, ON BAYSHORE.
AND YOU WILL HAVE BEEN THE AQUATICA BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM.
TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE BAYSHORE GARDENS,
YOU WILL HAVE BAYSHORE ON THE WATERWAY.
YOU HAVE A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION.
AND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE BAYSHORE AND BAY
TO BAY.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAVE LOOKED WORKED
WITH THE APPLICANT.
APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ONE WAIVER, AND THERE'S A REDUCTION
OF PARKING PROPOSED FROM 605 TO 458 PARKING SPACES.
THERE'S A 24% REDUCTION.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COORDINATION HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FIND IT OVERALL TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE

CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING
REVISIONS.
THANK YOU.
9:38:06PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ZAIN, GIVE ME THAT PARKING REDUCTION
NUMBER AGAIN.
9:38:11PM >> PROPOSED PARKING FROM 605 REQUIRED TO 458 BEING PROPOSED.
24% REDUCTION.
9:38:19PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, SIR.
9:38:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE?
PETITIONER.
9:38:28PM >>TYLER HUDSON:
400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
BRING UP THE PowerPoint FOR 17.
WITH ME THIS EVENING IS THE DEVELOPERS BASED OUT OF
CHARLOTTE, SITTING IN THE VERY BACK WE HAVE A LOT OF
EXPERTS, THE ONLY ONE PERTINENT TO THIS SPECIFIC HEARING IS
RANDY COEN WHO IS RIGHT BEHIND ME.
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE SITE LOOKS NOW AS YOU ARE COMING OFF
OF BAYSHORE WEST TOWARDS THE ON-RAMP OF THE CROSSTOWN, ABOUT
THREE AND A HALF ACRES.
THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL ZONING CHANGES FOR THIS LAND.
ZAIN MENTIONED THE RESIDENTIAL PART.
THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2016.
WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY CHANGES TO THAT.

THAT'S NOT NEW.
WE DON'T EVEN -- THAT'S A CONDO THAT'S BEING CONSTRUCTED.
ALL WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TODAY IS THE OFFICE BUILDING.
WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT TEARING IT DOWN.
WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY FOOTPRINT CHANGES AT ALL.
ALL WE ARE HERE TO DO IS REDUCE THE OFFICE ENTITLEMENTS
SLIGHTLY, INCREASE THE RESTAURANT ENTITLEMENTS SLIGHTLY,
SOLACE THE FIRST FLOOR, AND THAT'S A SOMEWHAT INSUBSTANTIAL
CHANGE UNDER THE CODE, ENOUGH OF A CHANGE BRING THIS PD
RIGHT BACK TO YOU.
SO THAT'S WHY WE ARE HERE FOR THAT FAIRLY NARROW PURPOSE.
AND TO REITERATE, WE ARE NOT HERE ABOUT THE RED PART, JUST
ABOUT THE GRAY PART. IN TERMS OF THE NUMBERS, WE ARE
TALKING ABOUT A REDUCTION IN THE OFFICE, SQUARE FOOTAGE BY
13,000 SQUARE FEET.
IN ADDITION A RESTAURANT RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 21,000
SQUARE FEET.
THE IDEA IS THAT THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDINGS, THE
OFFICE BUILDINGS REALLY DEVOTED TO RETAIL AND FOOD AND
BEVERAGE USES TO SUPPORT THE DENSITY THAT'S AROUND THIS
AREA, IN LIEU OF OFFICE.
THE OFFICE WILL CONTINUE TO BE THE PRIMARY USE FOR THE REST
OF THE FLOORS, AND THEN WE ARE PROPOSING THE ADDITION OF A
RESTAURANT, POTENTIAL BAR USE ON THE ROOFTOP.
I WOULD NOTE THAT THE ONLY PORTION OF THIS BUILDING RIGHT

NOW THAT IS WET ZONED IS THE COUNTER CULTURE RESTAURANT SO
ANY ALCOHOL SERVICE IN ANY OF THESE NEW RESTAURANTS OR
RETAIL ENTITLEMENTS WE ARE SEEKING WILL COME BEFORE YOU
THROUGH A SEPARATE WEB ONE.
THAT'S NOT BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.
THIS IS WHAT THE BUILDING WILL LOOK LIKE, TO DO WITH
RESKINNING THE BUILDING, WINDOWS, EXTERIOR FACADES, SORT OF
A GREEN WALL CONCEPT ON THE EASTERLY BUILDING.
THERE'S A SHOT THERE.
AGENCIES INCLUDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WE DO NOT HAVE
SUPPORT FROM TRANSPORTATION BECAUSE WE ARE SEEKING A PARKING
WAIVER.
I WOULD LIKE TO TALK A LITTLE ABOUT THAT RIGHT NOW.
RANDY IS HERE TO GO INTO DETAIL IF ANYONE HAS QUESTIONS, BUT
THERE'S ONLY THREE MAIN REASONS FOR THE PARKING REDUCTION.
FIRST IS THAT THIS IS A CLUSTER OF EMERGING RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY THAT DIDN'T EXIST AT ALL FIVE YEARS AGO.
RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE OVER 500 UNITS THAT WITHIN NOT MUCH MORE
THAN A QUARTER BLOCK SO WHAT YOU SEE ON SCREEN THAT'S BEEN
THERE FOR SOME TIME, BUT CARLTON DEVELOPMENTS, AQUATICA, YOU
HAVE ALTURAL, THE PARCEL I TOLD YOU THAT WE ARE NOT TALKING
ABOUT, THAT'S LITERALLY NEXT DOOR TO US.
70 UNITS.
SO THIS IS A NICE CULTURE OF RESIDENTIAL THAT DID NOT EXIST
BEFORE AND THE RETAIL, RESTAURANT USE, TO BE AKIN TO A MUCH,

MUCH SMALLER SCALE TO HYDE PARK, FITS IN WITH THE COMMUNITY
AROUND IT, AND THE ANTICIPATION IS A LOT OF PATRONS, THE
FOLKS WHO LIVE WITHIN A QUARTER MILE, WHICH BY STANDARD IS A
VERY REASONABLE TO WALK AND NOT TO DRIVE.
THE SECOND ELEMENT IS THE OVERLAPPING NATURE OF THE USES.
RANDY CAN GO INTO COMPONENTS GREATER DETAIL BUT WE BELIEVE
THE MAXIMUM PARKING IS 282 PARKING SPACE, THE RESTAURANT,
RETAIL OFFICE COMPONENT, AND THAT'S BETWEEN 7 AND 9 P.M.
WHEN THE FOLKS WHO ARE AT THE OFFICE AT THE VERY END OF THE
DAY AND THAT'S WHEN THE RETAIL USES ARE REALLY AMPING UP AND
WE HAVE OVER 301 DEDICATED TO THE COMBINED OFFICE, RETAIL,
RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH WE THINK IS MORE THAN APPROPRIATE,
AND THE THIRD REASON, TOO AS RANDY CAN TALK ABOUT THIS IN
GREATER DEPTH, BUT THE LITERATURE FROM ITE, TRIP MANUAL,
ULI, THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS ON PARKING HASN'T REALLY CAUGHT
UP TO THE NORMAL -- WHATEVER THE NORMAL ENVIRONMENT THIS IS,
WHERE THERE IS A GREATER TENDENCY THAN, AND WE ARE NOT
ASSUMING THAT'S GOING TO LAST FOREVER BUT I THINK THE
ASSUMPTION GOT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE OFFICE UNITS IS
GOING TO HAVE FULLY OCCUPIED FOR THE FULL WORK DAY.
WE DON'T THINK THAT'S AN ASSUMPTION WE CAN RELY ON IN THE
FUTURE BUT THAT'S WHAT OUR PARKING IS BASED ON.
SO IN CONCLUSION, THERE'S MORE THAN ENOUGH PARKING TO
SERVICE THIS DEVELOPMENT.
IT'S ACTUALLY NOT IN OUR INTEREST TO UNDERPARK IT.

WE ARE NOT TALKING A IT ALL ABOUT THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING.
BUT FOR THE USAGE WE ARE PROPOSING, EXPERIENCED DEVELOPING
THESE TYPES OF MIXED USE CENTERS AROUND THE COUNTRY, WE
BELIEVE THIS WILL BE ACCURATE.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
9:44:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN CHAMBERS TO
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 17, FILE REZ 22-72?
WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON ONLINE?
PAMELA CARPENTER.
MS. CARPENTER?
UNMUTE YOURSELF, PLEASE.
TURN YOUR CAMERA ON.
MS. CARPENTER, ARE YOU THERE?
MS. CARPENTER, YOU NEED TO UNMUTE YOURSELF.
9:44:52PM >> YES.
I THINK YOU CAN HEAR ME NOW.
9:44:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, THANK YOU.
9:44:56PM >> OKAY?
9:45:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
YOU NEED TO RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN.
9:45:06PM >> I AM A RESIDENT.
9:45:08PM >>THE CLERK:
DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY THAT
YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE
TRUTH?

THANK YOU.
9:45:15PM >> YES.
9:45:16PM >> I'M PAMELA CARPENTER, RESIDENT 5:
YEAR RESIDENT IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE WERE ABLE TO MEET WITH THE DEVELOPERS.
THEY ANSWERED ALL OF OUR QUESTIONS, AND EXCEPT ONE THAT I
WOULD LIKE TO --
SIDEWALK ON ISABELLA, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PARALLEL, RENDERING
DOES SHOW A SIDEWALK, TO THE NEXT DEVELOPMENT IN THE PARCEL
IT ALTURA.
IT'S CURRENTLY PARALLEL PARKING.
THAT'S THE ONLY COMMENT I HAVE ON IT.
9:46:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THERE IS NO ONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS FOR COMMENT.
WOULD YOU LIKE REBUTTAL?
9:46:18PM >>TYLER HUDSON:
TYLER HUDSON FOR THE RECORD.
WE WERE FAMILIAR WITH MS. CARPENTER'S CONCERNS.
THERE IS A SIDEWALK.
IT'S NOT OUT OF THE GENEROSITY OF OUR HEART.
IT'S PART OF THE AGREEMENT THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS SUBJECT TO
BACK IN 2016 SO THERE WILL BE A SUBJECT EXACTLY AS SHOWN ON
THE RENDERINGS RUNNING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ISABELLA
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PROPERTY.
THAT'S IT.
9:46:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?

9:46:46PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
9:46:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
9:46:57PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
REZ 22-72.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
2907 WEST BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD AND FOLIO NUMBER 127,083.0000
IN THE CITY OF TAMPA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE,
BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL, RETAIL SALES, RESTAURANT, BAR/LOUNGE
AND RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9:47:39PM >> SECOND.
9:47:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
9:47:46PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
9:47:48PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
9:47:49PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
9:47:51PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
9:47:53PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
9:47:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.

9:47:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
9:47:55PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
9:48:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
DO WE HAVE THE PETITIONER FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 13?
9:48:22PM >> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
9:48:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I CAN HEAR YOU BUT I CANNOT SEE YOU.
9:48:25PM >> WHAT ABOUT NOW?
9:48:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO, SIR.
YES, SIR.
NOW WE CAN SEE YOU AND WE CAN HEAR YOU.
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN.
(OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK).
9:48:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE
RECORD?
9:48:49PM >> YES, SIR.
GOOD EVENING.
MY NAME IS JD ALSABBAGH, ENGINEERING, TAMPA 33615.
AND I HAVE ALREADY SWORN.
QUICKLY, AS YOU SEE THE STAFF APPLICATION IS FOR THE CITY OF
TAMPA REQUIREMENTS.
WE HAVE REVIEWED THE STAFF REPORT AND WE ARE IN AGREEMENT ON
THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND CONDITIONS.
THERE IS NOTHING ELSE TO ADD EXCEPT ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL,

AND READY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
9:49:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR ANY QUESTIONS FOR
THE PETITIONER?
NO COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK?
IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE?
9:49:47PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
9:49:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY DEMAND GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
9:49:55PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
FILE REZ 22-51.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
6202 INTERBAY BOULEVARD AND 6001 SOUTH MARTINDALE AVENUE IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60
RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, AND CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD,
TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9:50:26PM >> SECOND.
9:50:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.

9:50:35PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:

9:50:38PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
9:50:39PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
9:50:40PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
9:50:41PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
9:50:42PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
9:50:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
9:50:44PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER
20th, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
9:50:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
INFORMATION REPORTS OF THE.
9:50:57PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES, SIR, IF I MAY, I JUST HAVE ONE QUICK
ONE.
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU ALL BUT EVER WRITE GO I GET QUESTIONS
ABOUT THE BLOOMBERG CONTRACT.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK CITY STAFF TO REPORT TO
COUNCIL DURING STAFF REPORTS ON OCTOBER 20th AS TO AN
UPDATE ON THE BLOOMBERG AGREEMENT INCLUDING HOW MANY
CONSULTANTS THE DEPARTMENTS THEY ARE EMBEDDED IN, ANY ADVICE
GIVEN TO DATE.
9:51:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HOW MANY STAFF REPORTS DO WE HAVE THAT DAY?
9:51:32PM >> LAST COUNT, 13.
9:51:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
13 STAFF REPORTS?
9:51:36PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES, BEFORE YOUR 9:30 PUBLIC HEARINGS.

9:51:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN WE MOVE THAT TO ANOTHER DATE,
COUNCILMAN CARLSON?
9:51:43PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT IS THE NEXT DATE?
9:51:46PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHAT DID YOU ASK FOR?
9:51:52PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE 20th.
9:51:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
17.
9:51:56PM >>BILL CARLSON:
17th OF NOVEMBER?
9:52:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ALREADY HAVE TEN STAFF REPORTS THERE.
9:52:09PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT A WRITTEN REPORT OR A
DISCUSSION?
I MEAN, NO OFFENSE, BUT WE YOU ARE AT 13 --
9:52:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HOW ABOUT NOVEMBER 1st?
THAT'S JUST BEFORE THE HOLIDAY.
9:52:34PM >>>:
ALL RIGHT, DECEMBER 3rd.
9:52:35PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE IDEA THAT WE CAN HEAR AND THE PUBLIC
CAN HEAR, SO JUST BEFORE THE HOLIDAY, THEY MAY NOT HEAR IT
AND HE THEN WE WILL DEFEAT THE PURPOSE OF HAVING THE
DISCUSSION.
9:52:43PM >> MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANYTHING FURTHER?
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO?
9:53:00PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NOTHING.
9:53:01PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.

9:53:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
NO.
9:53:07PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR A
COMMENDATION TO THIS YEAR'S WATERWISE AWARD RECIPIENT ON
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3rd, 2022.
I WILL HAVE TO GET THE NAME OF THE RECIPIENT.
I DON'T KNOW IT YET.
9:53:20PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
9:53:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
9:53:28PM >>LUIS VIERA:
NOTHING AT ALL, SIR.
I DID WANT TO ADD TO THE BLOOMBERG MOTION, THAT I HAVE BEEN
ASKED ABOUT THAT AS WELL, AND HEARD SOME THINGS.
SO I WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN HEARING ABOUT THAT AGAIN,
JUST A LOT OF INTERESTING THINGS OUT THERE.
SO JUST INTERESTED IN THAT AS WELL.
THANK YOU, SIR.
9:53:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
I AM TURNING IN MY REPORT FOR CASE AB 2-21-32.
I HAD TO RECUSE MYSELF AS I AM A MEMBER OF THAT
ORGANIZATION.
9:54:03PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
9:54:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN WE?
OKAY.

THANKS VERY MUCH.
I MOVE TO HAVE --
9:54:21PM >>> SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ALL RIGHT.
YES, SIR.
9:54:27PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I MOVE TO INVITE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION,
TPO, AND SPEAK TO TAMPA CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE CPO'S
SEPTEMBER VOTE TO AMEND THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MOU
BETWEEN THE TPO AND THE CITY OF TAMPA AND PROVIDE INPUT FOR
THE 2022 MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT PLAN.
I WOULD LIKE HER TO PRESENT OCTOBER 6th REGULAR MEETING.
AND THAT IS --
9:55:05PM >>> [OFF MICROPHONE]
9:55:10PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
UNDER CEREMONIAL.
9:55:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, CEREMONIAL.
9:55:13PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FROM CHAIRMAN CITRO, SECOND BY
MEMBER CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
9:55:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY
MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE ADJOURNED.

[MEETING ADJOURNED]


DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.