TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2022
5:01 P.M.

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.


5:01:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WELCOME TO THE EVENING SESSION OF TAMPA
CITY COUNCIL ON THIS DATE OCTOBER 13, 2022.
ROLL CALL.
5:01:56PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
5:01:58PM >>LUIS VIERA:
(NO AUDIBLE RESPONSE)
5:01:59PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
5:02:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
5:02:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
5:02:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
5:02:04PM >>THE CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
5:02:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:02:09PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
[OFF MICROPHONE]
WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING, TO RECOGNIZE SOMEONE
WHO HAS BEEN A STALWART, SOMEBODY WHO YOU CAN ALWAYS COUNTED
ON WHEN HE WAS ELECTED, AND HE HAS BEEN A WONDERFUL ASSET TO
THE CITY OF TAMPA.
AND THAT GENTLEMAN IS TOM VANN, AND HE'S HERE TODAY FOR A

COMMENDATION THAT THIS COUNCIL SO RIGHTLY APPROVED.
IT'S MY PLEASURE TO READ THE COMMENDATION.
THE CITY OF TAMPA IS HONORED TO PRESENT THE COMMENDATION TO
TOM VANN IN RECOGNITION OF HIS DECADES OF SERVICES, AND THE
TAMPA CITY COUNCIL AND CITIZENS OF ALL THE CITY OF TAMPA,
CHAIRMAN FOR HIS LAST TWO TERMS ON COUNCIL AND WAS A
STABILIZING FORCE IN HIS CAREER.
THIS HISTORY INCLUDES BEING A UNITED STATES ARMY VETERAN,
SERVING IN THE TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL FOR NINE
YEARS, THE FOUNDER OF TOM VANN INSURANCE COMPANY, AND SERVED
AS PRESIDENT OF THE TAMPA LIFE UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION.
HE ALSO WORKED AS A REALTOR FOR CENTURY 21 AND A MEMBER OF
THE FLORIDA BLOOD SERVICES IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, THE
ADVISORY BOARD.
HE HAS BEEN A MASON FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS.
IN 2001 HE RECEIVED THE 33rd DEGREE AT THE LAKE WORTH
SCOTTISH RITE MASONIC CENTER.
TOM WORKED FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMMISSION, BRIAN
BLAIR, AND ESTABLISHED THE NATION'S FIRST ZONE ON FLETCHER
AVENUE IN FRONT OF JOHN MACK VILLAGE. IN 2007 HE BECAME THE
PRESIDENT OF JOHN MACKS RESIDENT ASSOCIATION.
TOM VANN IS AWESOME BUT TODAY BECAUSE TOM IS LEAVING FLORIDA
AND MOVING TO KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE TO BE WITH HIS FAMILY,
NOT TO MENTION THEY HAVE A GREAT FOOTBALL TEAM.
HE WILL BE SORELY MISSED, AND IT'S MY HONOR TO MAKE THIS

PRESENTATION TO TOM VANN.
ASIDE FROM THAT, I KNEW TOM VANN WHEN HE WAS A RACQUETBALL
PLAYER, AND I MEAN JUST NOT A COUNCILMAN ROCKET BALL PLAYER.
AT AGE 56 AS I RECALL, THEY HAD PRETTY GOOD PEOPLE, GUYS, SO
FORTH THAT PLAYED RACQUETBALL.
AND AT 56, I HATE TO TELL YOU, IT WAS NO CONTEST WITH TOM
VANN.
HE WAS THE CHAMPION, AND HE WON MANY, MANY TOURNAMENTS.
HE WAS AN EXCELLENT RACQUETBALL PLAYER.
BUT BESIDES ALL OF THAT HE HAD ONE THING, A BIG HEART.
HE ALWAYS WAS WILLING TO STAND UP FOR WHAT HE BELIEVES IN,
ALWAYS WILLING TO GO THE EXTRA STEP TO HELP SOMEBODY IN
NEED.
AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT, THERE WAS A MAYOR THAT SHOULD BE GRAD
GRATIFYING TO TOM VANN, BECAUSE TOM VANN, IN THOSE DAYS, WAS
THE DECIDING VOTE OF WHO THE CHAIRMAN WAS GOING TO BE OF
THAT COUNCIL, AND IT IS BY A 4-3 VOTE THAT SANDY FREEDMAN
BECAME THE CHAIRMAN, AND TOM VANN WAS THE FOURTH VOTE.
ALL YOU CAN SEE THE FIRST OR THE THIRD, BUT IT WAS REALLY AN
INDIVIDUAL THAT SAW SOMETHING, AND THEREAFTER, BECAME
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, BOB MARTINEZ, RESIGNED TO
RUN FOR GOVERNOR, AND THEREFORE SANDY FREEDMAN BECAME THE
MAYOR.
AND TOM VANN, HE SAW SOMETHING, AND HE DID THE RIGHT THING.
TOM, WE ARE GRATEFUL TO YOU FOR THAT.

ALONG WITH THAT, HE NEVER HAD A CITY BUTTON.
THE LAST BUTTON THAT I HAVE ON THIS COAT.
BUT I AM GOING TO HAND TO THE TOM VANN.
AND WITH TOM VANN TO HIS RIGHT IS TERRY GEIGER.
TERRY WAS HIS AIDE AND ALSO THE AID OF EDDIE CAPALARO AND
SHE DID AN OUTSTANDING JOB, TO DIGNIFY THE OPPORTUNITY THAT
WE HAVE TO BE WITH TOM VANN, NOT FOR THE LAST TIME BUT FOR
THE LAST SECONDS OF HIS LIFE THAT HE'S GOING TO BE HERE WITH
US BECAUSE HE'S MOVING TO TENNESSEE.
AND I HOPE YOU HAVE SOMETHING, A VOLUNTEER.
HOPE YOU DON'T FORGET THE FLORIDA GATORS AND SEMINOLES AND
HURRICANES AND SO FORTH.
BUT TOM, IT'S MY PLEASURE TO PRESENT YOU WITH THIS
COMMENDATION, BUT BEFORE I GIVE HIM THE COMMENDATION, I
THINK OUR HONORABLE E.J. SALCINES, IT WOULD BE MIDNIGHT AND
APRIL BUILT TIME I FINISH.
SO MR. E.J. SALCINES, PLEASE SAY SOMETHING TO TOM VANN.
5:07:14PM >> I COME COMMEND YOU AND THE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL FOR
THIS EXTRAORDINARY COMMENDATION THAT YOU ARE GIVING TO TOM
VANN.
I HAVE BEEN A PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FOR
ALMOST MY CAREER, AND THAT IS 59 YEARS.
AND DURING THOSE YEARS, AS THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY IN
FEDERAL COURT, AND LATER AS THE HILLSBOROUGH PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY AND JUDGE OF THE FLORIDA APPEAL, I ALWAYS KNEW THAT

TOM VANN NOT ONLY HAD A BIG HEART BUT HE WAS TOTALLY
DEDICATED TO HELPING THE CITY OF TAMPA.
HE WAS ALWAYS HELPING PEOPLE, NEVER LOOKING FOR SOMETHING,
ALWAYS GIVING, ALWAYS HELPING.
CHARLIE TALKS ABOUT WHAT A GREAT HANDBALL PLAYER HE WAS.
MY BOSS WAS EDDIE PORTMAN, THE U.S. DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR
ALL OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
AND HE WOULD CHALLENGE TOMMY VANN TO GO OVER TO THE YMCA,
AND TOMMY VANN ALWAYS WOULD DESTROY HIM.
HE WOULD COME BACK TO THE U.S. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
SAYING, VANN BEAT ME AGAIN!
BUT NOT ONLY DID HE BEAT EDDIE BOARDMAN, HE WOULD BEAT OUR
FORMER MAYOR OF TAMPA, JULIAN LANE, WHO WAS ANOTHER GREAT
HANDBALL EXPERT, ALWAYS HAVING TO ADMIT THAT TOMMY VANN WAS
THE REAL CHAMP.
TOMMY VANN STARTED AS A LITTLE BOY PICKING STRAWBERRIES.
HE WOULD GO TO SCHOOL OFF OF THE REGULAR ACADEMIC YEAR
BECAUSE OF THE HARVEST OF STRAWBERRIES, AND CAME FROM A POOR
FAMILY, WORKING FOR THE RAILROAD COMPANY.
ACTUALLY, HIS HOME WAS A RAILROAD HOME THAT HIS FATHER AS AN
EMPLOYEE OF THE RAILROAD COMPANY, AT LEAST, HAD A HOME TO
RAISE A FAMILY.
SO HE WOULD WORK FROM THE AGE OF SIX, WORKING IN THE FIELDS
THERE IN TURKEY CREEK.
WE ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT TOMMY VANN WAS THE REAL MAYOR OF

TURKEY CREEK.
HE WENT ON TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BUT
ESPECIALLY OF TAMPA.
SO KNOXVILLE, KNOXVILLE MAY BE THE WINNER, AND TAMPA IS THE
LOSER, BECAUSE WE ARE LOSING AN OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SERVANT
WHO DEDICATED HIS LIFE TO HELPING PEOPLE.
I FOR ONE ADMIRE TOMMY BECAUSE KNOWING HOW MUCH THE MASONRY
AND THE SCOTTISH RITE AND THE SHRINE HAS DONE IN THIS
COMMUNITY, NO ONE HAS GIVEN MORE EULOGIES IN MASONIC
FUNERALS THAN TOM VANN.
SO TOM, WE ARE GOING TO MISS YOU, BUT ON BEHALF OF THAT
SILENT MAJORITY OF PEOPLE OUT THERE IN TAMPA, ON THEIR
BEHALF, WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR LOYALTY, YOUR HARD WORK, YOUR
HONESTY, YOU'RE INTEGRITY, AND YOUR LOVE FOR TAMPA.
WE ARE GOING TO MISS YOU.
IF THEY DON'T BRING YOU BACK VOLUNTARILY, LET ME KNOW AND I
WILL SEND YOU A SUBPOENA.
[ LAUGHTER ]
BUT PLEASE KNOW THAT THE PEOPLE OF TAMPA APPRECIATE WHAT YOU
HAVE DONE IN YOUR LIFETIME.
GOD BLESS.
5:11:00PM >> TOM VANN:
THANK YOU.
5:11:04PM >> AND THANK YOU FOR TAKING THIS OCCASION TO RECOGNIZE AN
OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SERVANT.
5:11:09PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
TOMMY, HERE IS YOUR COMMENDATION, TOM.

AS I SAID BEFORE, NO OTHER HAS DONE MORE THAN YOU HAVE FOR
THE CITY OF TAMPA AND THE SERVICES FOR ALL THOSE YEARS ON
CITY COUNCIL.
I'M JUST SORRY THAT YOU HAD TO WORK ALONG WITH EDDIE
CAMPELERRO.
5:11:44PM >> TOM VANN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH AND I DO APPRECIATE THE TIME
FOR THE WORDS SPOKEN TODAY ON MY BEHALF.
BUT I NEED TO RECOGNIZE MY FORMER AIDE, TERRY GEIGER.
SHE WAS WONDERFUL, AND SHE DID A LOT FOR TAMPA, AND
ESPECIALLY FOR ME, BECAUSE I COULD JUST THINK ABOUT A
PROBLEM, AND SHE WOULD GO AHEAD AND DO IT.
AND SHE WAS JUST FANTASTIC.
AND I DO APPRECIATE EVERYTHING, AND I APPRECIATE BEING IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA ALL THESE YEARS.
GOD BLESS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU.
AND I DO WANT TO LEAVE ONE THING WITH YOU.
CHAPTER 40, VERSE 8: THE GRASS WHITHERED, THE FLOWER FADED,
BUT THE WORD OF OUR GOD SHALL STAND FOREVER.
GOD BLESS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU.
THANK YOU.
[ APPLAUSE ]
5:12:47PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
A QUICK PICTURE BECAUSE THIS MAN HAS
DONE A LOT FOR THE CITY.
5:15:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING TO MR.
VANN?

SURELY, PLEASE.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
5:15:18PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO TAMPA, AND COUNCILMAN
MIRANDA, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD, AND JUDGE
SALCINES, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD AS WELL, SIR,
AND WHATNOT.
IT'S VERY OBVIOUS THAT YOU BUILT A REALLY GREAT FOUNDATION
OF YOUR LIFE IN PUBLIC SERVICE, AND HAVING TWO GENTLEMEN
VOUCH FOR YOU IN SUCH A REMARKABLE WAY TO BRING YOU HERE
SPEAKS A LOT ABOUT YOUR CHARACTER.
YOU QUOTE FROM THE BIBLE, AND I'M NOT A CHAPTER AND VERSE
GUY BUT I REMEMBER THE BOOK OF PROVERBS, UNLESS SOMEONE
BUILD THEIR HOUSE UPON THE LORD, I BELIEVE IT SAYS IT'S
OBVIOUS THAT YOUR FOUNDATION IS REALLY SOLID HAVING PEOPLE
LIKE THAT BACKING YOU UP, AND HONORABLE RECORD OF SERVICE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:16:06PM >> THANK YOU.
5:16:11PM >> ONE MORE TIME FOR TOMMY VANN.
[ APPLAUSE ]
5:16:18PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I'M GLAD I GOT TO MEET YOU JUST NOW BEFORE
YOU LEFT AND I AM SAD THAT WE NEVER GOT A CHANCE TO SIT DOWN
FOR COFFEE.
AS MY COLLEAGUE SAID YOU ARE INTRODUCED BY TWO TITANS OF
HISTORY HERE, AND IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU HAVE A LOT OF WISDOM

AND EXPERIENCE.
I HOPE THAT FROM KNOXVILLE YOU WILL WATCH THESE MEETINGS AND
CALL US AND TELL US WHAT WE ARE DOING RIGHT OR WRONG.
GIVE US SOME ADVICE.
BUT HAVE A GREAT TIME IN KNOXVILLE AND WELL DESERVED.
5:16:43PM >> THANKS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU.
5:16:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:16:48PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU COUNCILMAN VANN FOR YOUR MANY
YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE COMMUNITY.
WE WILL CERTAINLY MISS YOU.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA SAID IT ALL AND I KNOW HE DID WORK WITH
YOU FOR A TIME THERE AND SERVICE ON THE BOARD, AND
EVERYTHING THAT JUDGE SALCINES MENTIONED AS WELL.
YOU KNOW, YOU ARE ONE OF THE SPECIAL PEOPLE THAT MAKES TAMPA
THE GREAT CITY THAT IT IS, AND YOU HAVE DEDICATED YOUR LIFE
AND GIVING BACK IN SERVING AND WE GREATLY, GREATLY
APPRECIATE IT AND THE CITY WILL MISS YOU.
CONGRATULATIONS AND THANK YOU, SIR.
5:17:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:17:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WANT TO REITERATE, THANK YOU FOR ALL THE
THINGS YOU HAVE DONE FOR TAMPA AND THROUGHOUT YOUR PERSONAL
COMMUNITY.
WE ARE GOING TO MISS YOU BUT I KNOW YOU ARE REALLY GOING TO
ENJOY BEING CLOSER TO YOUR FAMILY.
CONGRATULATIONS.

5:17:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MY ILLUSTRIOUS BROTHER, IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A
PLEASURE SITTING IN THE LODGE WITH YOU BUT I WANT TO THANK
YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO STAND ON YOUR SHOULDERS.
THE FOUNDATION THAT YOU HAVE LAID FOR US WE WILL ALWAYS
REMEMBER.
THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DID FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA.
THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME FOLLOW YOU.
5:17:56PM >> TOM VANN:
THANK YOU.
[ APPLAUSE ]
5:18:01PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.
5:18:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
MR. HUSAIN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO THROUGH THE AGENDA WITH US?
5:18:31PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
IT'S VERY HARD TO FOLLOW UP, BUT FIRST I
WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR THE AGENDA.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, REZ 22-44 IS A MISNOTICE AND CANNOT BE
HEARD.
PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM THE AGENDA.
5:18:46PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
[OFF MICROPHONE]
5:18:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO A REMOVE AGENDA ITEM 22-44 BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
5:18:57PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THAT'S ALL WE NEED TO CLEAR.

THANK YOU.
5:19:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
FIRST CASE WE WILL SHALL HEARING AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE SU-2-232-08.
5:19:11PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, CASE SU-2-22-08 IS BEING REQUESTED FOR
A SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A DENTAL CLINIC AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED
3911 NORTH BOULEVARD STREET.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:19:30PM >> SAM THOMAS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN YET.
5:19:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANYONE WHO IS GOING TO BE GIVING EVIDENCE IN ANY OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS THIS EVENING, WOULD YOU PLEASE RISE TO BE SWORN
IN?
5:20:10PM >>THE CLERK:
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU ENTIRE OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO
GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?
5:20:22PM >> I DO.
5:20:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
5:20:23PM >> SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICT AND THE TAMPA HITS URBAN VILLAGE AND THE TAMPA
HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET NORTH OF
THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY

CALVIN TAYLOR PARK IS APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTHEAST OF
THE SITE.
THE SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SITE. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS
LARGELY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. TO THE NORTH ALONG
MLK BOULEVARD ARE SOME COMMERCIAL USES.
AND THEN TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS ANOTHER
RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND ACROSS FROM THE SITE IS A RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE AS WELL.
YOU CAN SEE CALVIN TAYLOR PARK ITSELF THERE.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
THE SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE LEVEL 10 DESIGNATION. THIS
DESIGNATION PROVIDES FOR LOW DENSITY NEIGHBORHOOD USES
INCLUDING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING, LIMITED TOWNHOMES,
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES CAN BE CONSIDERED WITH
THEIR OWN LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS
LARGELY RESIDENTIAL 10. AS YOU MOVE NORTH OF MLK BOULEVARD
CORRIDOR, THERE IS SOME COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, AND THEN TO
THE SOUTHEAST THE GREEN IS A PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC CALVIN
TAYLOR PARK.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE 2 TO ALLOW FOR
OFFICES, AND DEVELOPMENT BY SQUARE FOOT FACILITIES, AND A
NEW 4,800 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING, OVERALL 6,805 SQUARE FEET OF
CENTRAL OFFICE USES AT A 0.25 F.A.R., BELOW THE 0.35 ALLOWED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION.

IT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION IF THE SUBJECT SITE MEETS LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
SINCE THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
THE SUBJECT SITE MEETS LOCATIONAL CRITERIA PER THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE PROPOSED CENTRAL OFFICE HAS COMPATIBLE USES DIRECTLY
NORTH AND SOUTH ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM NORTH
BOULEVARD TO THE FRONT DOOR OF THE PROPOSED DENTAL OFFICES
AND SHOWING CONSISTENCY TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS RELATES
TO PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
OVERALL, THE PROPOSAL IS COMPARABLE AND COMPARABLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND WILL NOT CREATE ANY NEGATIVE
IMPACT TO THE ADJACENT USES. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION
AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
5:22:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
5:22:45PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
BEFORE YOU IS A STAFF REPORT THAT HAS THE ADDITION OF
SECTION 27-132, FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICE CRITERIA.
IT BEGINS ON PAGE 4.
SU-2-22-08.
IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE.
PROPOSED IS FOR A DENTAL CLINIC.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE OVERHEAD VIEW.

AS YOU SEE THE PROPERTY HERE.
OVERHEAD, THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY.
TO THE NORTH, AND I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES WHERE THE DENTAL
OFFICE CURRENTLY IS, AND BUILDINGS TO THE SOUTH.
NOW, THE DENTAL OFFICE SOUTH WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND A BRAND
NEW DENTAL OFFICE WILL BE BUILT, AND THIS IS WHERE THE
SPECIAL USE THE 2nd IS PROPOSING.
THE BUILDING TO THE NORTH WILL BE THE SAME OWNER WILL BE
THEIR RESIDENT.
THE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 27,240 SQUARE FEET.
AS I SAID THE DENTAL OFFICE IS THERE CURRENTLY.
THE EXISTING DENTAL OFFICE TO THE SOUTH WILL BE DEMOLISHED
AND THE PROPOSED DENTAL OFFICE WILL BE 4800 SQUARE FEET.
THE ACCESS TO THE SITE COMES FROM NORTH BOULEVARD HERE TO
THE WEST.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST REQUIRES 31 PARKING SPACES AND THE
APPLICANT IS PROVIDING 31 PARKING SPACES.
THE SUBJECT SITE HAS PROPOSED HEIGHT OF 22nd 1 FEET IN
HEIGHT.
AS I WILL SHOW YOU THE OVERHEAD VIEW AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY.
AND THE SITE HERE CIRCLED IN RED.
THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED PD.
PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
OFFICE USES.

THEY ARE ZONED RS-60 AND PD.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST ARE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
USES AND THEY ARE ZONED RS-50 AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE
SOUTH IS AN OFFICE USE THAT IS ZONED PD.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
YOU SEE THE FRONT ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH.
AND ELEVATION FROM THE EAST.
I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES.
I'LL SHOW YOU WHAT I SAW.
SO THIS IS THE BUILDING TO THE NORTH, DENTAL.
THIS IS RESIDENCE.
ANOTHER VIEW OF THE DENTAL TO THE BACK.
THE NOTICE SIGN WITH PARKING TO THE SIDE AND THE REAR.
TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE THOSE OFFICES THAT WE SPOKE OF.
AS YOU LOOK TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.
AS YOU LOOK TO THE NORTHWEST YOU WILL HAVE COMMERCIAL, CITGO
AND OTHER COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS.
LOOKING TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE YOU WILL SEE THE
VACANT LAND THAT IS ZONED PD, A CAN CVS UP HERE.
THIS IS THE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH, STILL PART OF THE PARCEL
WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND A NEW DENTAL CLINIC OF 4800
SQUARE FEET WILL BE PROPOSED THERE.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS PER THE
REVISION SHEET.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:28:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
PETITIONER?
IS THE PETITIONER HERE?
5:28:51PM >> GOOD EVENING.
I'M GARY BOUCHER, OZONA ENGINEERING, 1095 INDIANA AVENUE IN
PALM HARBOR, ENGINEER AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER,
TOMLINSON, THE DOCTOR.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
I'M HERE TO TRY TO ANSWER THEM.
5:29:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
I JUST HAVE ONE.
THIS IS AN EXISTING BUSINESS.
IS THIS GOING TO BE A DEMOLITION OF ONE BUILDING AND THE
BUILDING OF ANOTHER BUILDING FOR THE SAME --
5:29:46PM >> YES.
NEW AND IMPROVED LARGER BUILDING.
ALL THE DENTAL OPERATIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE NEW

BUILDING.
THERE'S ONE EXISTING BUILDING THAT WILL BE USED, AND IT'S
THE DOCTOR'S PERSONAL SPACE AND RESIDENCE.
5:30:03PM >> THANK YOU.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO
THIS?
SEEING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
5:30:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE NUMBER 2, FILE NUMBER
SU-2-22-08, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT
SU-2 APPROVING A DENTAL CLINIC IN AN RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3911 NORTH
BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO STATE SOME FINDINGS OF FACT.
THE PROPOSED USE MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 10
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION SINCE THE SITE HAS ALREADY MET
REQUIRED LOCATION CRITERIA, GENERAL OFFICE WILL REDEVELOP AN
EXISTING BUILDING AND THE APPLICATION DOES NOT SEEK ANY

WAIVERS.
BASED ON THOSE FACTS I FIND THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE
WITH CONTIGUOUS AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND WILL NOT
ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT AND ENCOURAGE COMPATIBLE USE IN THE
AREA AND SPECIAL USES ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION IN RO ZONING
DISTRICT, LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT 10,000 FEET, DOES NOT SEEK
ADDITIONAL PARKING.
5:31:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT WILL INCLUDE THE REVISION?
5:31:39PM >>BILL CARLSON:
INCLUDING THE REVISION BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
5:31:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
IS OUR PUSH THE BUTTON WORKING? ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
5:31:52PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
5:31:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
5:31:55PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
5:31:56PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
5:31:57PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
(NO RESPONSE.)
5:32:01PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
5:32:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
5:32:03PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
5:32:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3.
SU-2-22-10.
5:32:24PM >> SU-2-22-10 REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE 2 FOR PLACE OF
RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AT THE LOCATION 3402 HENDERSON BOULEVARD.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:32:36PM >> PLANNING COMMISSION SITE.
IT'S IN THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STORM IS ONE FOURTH OF A MILE AND IT'S
ABOUT 3.1 MILES SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL D EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS A LIGHT COMMERCIAL USE ALONG
HENDERSON BOULEVARD AND A MIXTURE OF MULTIFAMILY FAMILY UNIT
AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNIT.
TO THE NORTH ALONG WEST AZEELE STREET THERE ARE
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
HERE IS A MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
DESIGNATION AND THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
THE RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION PROVIDES FOR MEDIUM INTENSITY
AND RESIDENTIAL USES INCLUDING MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED USES, AND THERE'S NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SERVING
USES, FUTURE LAND USE IS TO ALLOW FOR GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL USES OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS LARGELY MADE UP OF RESIDENTIAL 35

MIXED USE 35, RESIDENTIAL 20 AND RESIDENTIAL 10.
YOU CAN SEE THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 ALONG HENDERSON
BOULEVARD.
THE LIGHTER COLOR HERE IS THE RESIDENTIAL 10.
SO RESIDENTIAL 20 AND THEN THE MAROON COLOR IS THE
RESIDENTIAL 35.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE 2 TO ALLOW THE
EXPANSION OF A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND AN EXISTING
BUILDING.
A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IS COMPRISED OF TWO BUILDINGS
ON TWO PARCELS, TO THE SOUTH WILL BE EXPANDED BY 1,540
SQUARE FEET AND NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO THE NORTHERN
STRUCTURE. THE REQUEST IS FOR A TOTAL OF 8,745 SQUARE FEET
PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AT A 0.465 F.A.R. TO RESIDENTIAL
35 PORTION OF THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED F.A.R. IS BELOW THE .6 F.A.R. ALLOWED IN A
RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION.
APPLICANT IS PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ON HENDERSON
BOULEVARD TO THE FRONT DOOR OF THE BUILDING, ENSURING
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES RELATED TO
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSAL IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE
WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND WILL NOT CREATE A
NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJACENT USES AND THE PROPOSAL IS
CONSISTENT WITH UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USES, RESIDENTIAL 35

AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
THAT'S THE END OF THE PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:35:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
5:35:22PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
CASE SU-2-22-10, LOCATION 3402 HENDERSON BOULEVARD.
THE CURRENT ZONING IS RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 24, AND
PROPOSED USE IS PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THREE WAIVERS.
FIRST WAIVER TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK
WHEREVER 40 FEET TO 19.2 FEET, SOUTH YARD FROM 40 FEET TO
31.6 FEET, AND EAST YARD FROM 40 FEET TO 38.2 FEET.
SECOND WAIVER TO ALLOW ACCESS TO LOCAL STREET, WE HAVE SOUTH
GLEN AVENUE AND WEST HORATIO STREET, AND PROPOSED WAIVER TO
REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 102 SPACES TO 52 SPACES.
THIS IS A 49% REDUCTION.
NOW, THE SPECIAL USE 2 WAS ALSO APPROVED AT THIS LOCATION
BACK IN 2012, FILE V-12-238.
IN THIS ADDITION SU-2, THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO ADD
ADDITIONAL 1540 SQUARE FEET TO THE EXISTING BUILDING WHICH
ALREADY CONTAINS 7,205 SQUARE FEET.
THE ADDITION WILL BE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PLACE OF
RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
THE MAXIMUM PROPOSED HEIGHT WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET,
AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE OVERHEAD VIEW, AERIAL.

YOU SEE THE OVERHEAD VIEW AERIAL OF THE SITE.
TO THE NORTH, AND TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE COMMERCIAL.
TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL AND
COMMERCIAL.
I WILL NOW SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPOSED SITE, THE PROPOSED ADDITION, RIGHT
HERE PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, THERE.
THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE SITE PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
THE EXISTING ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH AND THE WEST.
THE EXISTING ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
THE EXISTING ELEVATION FROM THE EAST AND SOUTH.
THE EXISTING ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH AND THE WEST CORNER.
THE EXISTING ELEVATION FROM THE EAST AND NORTH CORNER.
THE ELEVATION FROM THE EXISTING SOUTH.
NOW, THE PROPOSED ELEVATION, YOU SEE THE ELEVATION FROM THE
WEST ELEVATION HERE, THE ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH AND THE
WEST, AND THE ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH AND THE WEST.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE AS IS.
YOU SEE THE STRUCTURE AND WHERE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WILL
BE.
HERE IS THE PARKING ON-SITE.
THE ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
YOU HAVE HENDERSON HERE AND YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL UP AND DOWN

HENDERSON.
A SIGN AT THE SITE HERE.
TO THE WEST YOU WILL SEE HENDERSON AND GLEN.
YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL HERE.
FAMOUS TATE.
ALSO TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE A STRIP PALMA CEIA PLAZA OF
COMMERCIAL AND RESTAURANT.
TO THE SOUTH YOU WILL HAVE MAVILO WHOLESALERS.
AND ALSO TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE
RESIDENTIAL.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED
THE PETITION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE
INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND READING AS PER THE REVISION SHEET.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
5:40:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK?
5:40:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
[OFF MICROPHONE]
5:40:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
APPLICANT?
5:40:53PM >> GOOD EVENING MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
NICE TO SEE EVERYBODY IN PERSON.
NO CHANGE.
WE HAVE -- I'M ADAM FRITZ, ARCHITECTURE. WHAT WE ARE TRYING

TO DO IS GET THE CHURCH TO BE A CHURCH.
THIS CHURCH HAS BEEN IN SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY FOR QUITE A
FEW YEARS AND WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD AN ADDITION, ADA
RESTROOMS AND SOME OTHER FUNCTIONS THAT WILL BE ALLOWABLE
FOR THE CONGREGATION TO EXPAND AND TO CONTINUE TO BE A
BEACON OF LIGHT IN THE COMMUNITY.
WE ARE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THIS ADDITION, AND WE WANT TO --
WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
THE ADDITION IS A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF WHAT WE ARE OVERALL
ASKING FOR, AND WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS BACK IN
2012 AS WAS ALLUDED BY STAFF.
THERE WAS A DIFFERENT ADDITION ON A DIFFERENT PART OF THE
PROPERTY ABOUT THE SAME SIZE ADDITION, AND DURING THAT TIME
BETWEEN NOW AND 2012 AND NOW, THE CHURCH HAS SLIGHTLY
CHANGED, AND MOVING IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION.
SO WE ARE HERE AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
YOU MAY HAVE.
THANK YOU.
5:42:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:42:12PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SO MY QUESTION THEN, IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE
ADDING A FOYER AND OFFICE AREA.
THE REQUEST WITH THE WAIVER, WHAT REALLY IMPACTS, BECAUSE
YOU ARE NOT REALLY ADDING MORE SPACE FOR PEOPLE TO COME.
YOU ARE NOT TOUCHING THE PARKING LOT.
YOU ARE JUST ADDING THE FOYER, CORRECT?

5:42:36PM >> WE ARE ADDING THE FOYER, BUT -- I WILL SHOW YOU.
SO THE EXISTING SANCTUARY IS RIGHT HERE, AND THE ELEVATION
IS RIGHT HERE.
WHAT WE ARE DOING IS ADD SOMETHING CLASSROOMS, AND TWO ADA
RESTROOMS AND NURSERY, BUT THOSE FUNCTIONS ARE CURRENTLY
INSIDE THIS SPACE IN THE CHURCH.
SO AS WE ADD THE ADDITION ON HERE THERE WILL BE AN
ADDITIONAL SPACE INSIDE THE SANCTUARY FOR -- PEOPLE WHO ARE
GOING TO GO TO CHURCH, HOPEFULLY.
5:43:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
5:43:19PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE AND MAKING
YOUR PRESENTATION.
WHEN YOU SAID CLASSROOMS, ARE THOSE CLASSROOMS FOR THE
CHURCH OR CLASSROOMS FOR A SCHOOL?
5:43:27PM >> IT'S NOT FOR A SCHOOL.
IT'S ALL SUNDAY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS.
5:43:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
OKAY, THERE'S NO PLANS FOR A SCHOOL AT
ANY TIME.
5:43:35PM >> NO.
5:43:37PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU.
5:43:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT ONE LIKE TO SPEAK TO
THIS CASE?
IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY -- EXCUSE ME, MS. WELLS.

5:43:52PM >>CATE WELLS:
I JUST WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT.
I ALWAYS PROVIDE COUNCIL WITH STANDARD FORMS OF MOTIONS FOR
YOUR CONSIDERATION.
I WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT FOR THIS ITEM, THE SPECIAL USE
CRITERIA IS INCORRECT, SO WHOEVER, WHETHER IT'S GOING TO BE
FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL, I JUST WANT TO POINT THAT OUT.
AS ZAIN MENTIONED, THE SPECIAL USE CRITERIA FOR THIS USE,
THERE IS A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM AREA, WHICH THEY MEET,
AND THE ZONING DISTRICT IS RM-24.
I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THOSE DISCREPANCIES IN THE
DOCUMENT BEFORE YOU.
THANK YOU.
5:44:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
5:44:45PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, APPROVING A SPECIAL USE SU-2 APPROVING A
PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IN AN RM-24 RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3402
HENDERSON BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
AND AS FINDINGS OF FACT BASED UPON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL

EVIDENCE FOUND THE STAFF REPORTED, APPLICANT REPORT,
TESTIMONY, ET CETERA, FOUND THE FOLLOWING, THAT THERE IS
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE POLICIES, FOUND IN THE
STAFF REPORT, THAT SPECIAL USE CRITERIA, WAIVER CRITERIA TO
THE EXTENT RELEVANT ARE MET, AND THE GENERAL STANDARDS OF
27-129 ARE MET, AND THAT'S SUFFICIENT.
5:45:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WITH REVISION BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECONDING.
5:45:36PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
5:45:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
5:45:43PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
5:45:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
5:45:46PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
5:45:48PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
5:45:49PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
5:45:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
5:45:53PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
5:46:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, FILE REZ 22-08.
5:46:07PM >> 06.

5:46:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
06.
YOU ARE CORRECT.
5:46:14PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS IS A PROPOSED REZONING AT 407 EAST PALM AVENUE FROM
RM-24 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND
BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
88 NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:46:30PM >> SAM THOMAS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICT, TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND TAMPA HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD, LOCATED WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS LOCAL AND
NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS ONE BLOCK EAST OF THE SUBJECT
SITE AND THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY APPROXIMATELY
HALF A MILE TO THE SOUTHWEST.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION
ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SURROUNDING AREA
LARGELY MADE UP OF SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOMES AND
RESIDENTIAL OFFICES AND SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES TO THE NORTH
BOULEVARD, ALSO VACANT LAND TO THE NORTH OF PALM AVENUE.
THERE IS A MULTIFAMILY USES HERE, HERE AND HERE.
AND THE MAJORITY AND SOME OTHER MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE
SOUTH, THE REST OF THE REMAINING AREA IS LARGELY
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.

HERE IS A MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE.
THE SITE IS RECOGNIZED AS RESIDENTIAL 83 DESIGNATION.
THE DESIGNATION PROVIDES FOR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES
SUCH AS MICROPHONE DWELLING UNITS, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IF THERE'S LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. THE
SURROUNDING AREA IS LARGELY MADE UP OF THIS R-83 CATEGORY TO
THE NORTH, R-35 CATEGORY, AND THEN DOWN TO THE SOUTHEAST IS
EMU 60 CATEGORY AND THIS IS PARKING AREA.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE SITE FROM
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 24 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PERMIT
1,895 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES AND
1,648 SQUARE FEET SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
THE TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS NOT PROVIDED
TO THE SITE PLAN, IT'S 3,495 SQUARE FEET, AND IN AN EMAIL ON
OCTOBER 4th THE APPLICANT CONFIRMED THE PROPOSED TOTAL
SQUARE FOOTAGE AND AGREED TO REVISE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
ON THE SITE PLAN TO REFLECT 3,495 SQUARE FEET BETWEEN FIRST
AND SECOND READING.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN AN AREA OF THE CITY WHERE ALL THE
DEVELOPMENT IS PROMOTED.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DETERMINED THAT THE SITE IS
CONSISTENT WITH LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR BUSINESS
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES VEHICULAR ACCESS ON ALLEYS
WHERE FEASIBLE, DEDICATED PARKING AREA FOR THE OFFICES

PROVIDED AT THE REAR OF THE SITE WITH REAR VEHICULAR ACCESS
FROM THE ALLEY.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
VEHICULAR ACCESS OF THE ALLEYS AND POLICIES THAT SEEK TO
IMPROVE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.
IN CONCLUSION THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH
THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
5:49:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
5:49:22PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
BEFORE YOU NOW IS A STAFF REPORT THAT INCLUDES THE ARC MEMO
AND FINDINGS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMISSION REVIEWED
THIS PROPERTY 407 EAST PALM AVENUE ON JULY 13th, 2022.
AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND THE VOTE WAS 3 TO 2-0 FOR THE
FOLLOWING CONSIDERATIONS.
AND THESE ARE FOR THREE WAIVERS.
NOW, THE WAIVERS, TWO OF THE WAIVERS WERE NO LONGER NEEDED.
THE APPLICANT IS JUST REQUESTING ONE WAIVER, AND THAT WAIVER
IS TO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED USE BUFFER FROM 15 FEET
WITH A 6-FOOT CMU WALL TO 4 FEET WITH A SIX FOOT OPAQUE
VINYL FENCE ALONG THE EAST.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
THAT WOULD BE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ZONED RM-24.

TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY IS A VACANT LAND ZONED PD.
PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS ALSO VACANT, ZONED PD.
AND THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST HAS AN OFFICE USE AND ZONED PD.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
AND BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS AN AREA OF 8,925 SQUARE FEET OR
APPROXIMATELY 0.205 ACRES.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.
THIS STRUCTURE IS GOING TO REMAIN, AND THE EXISTING BUILDING
IS 1,895 SQUARE FEET.
THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 15 FEET, TO THE SOUTH
20 FEET, EAST 10 FEET AND WEST 4 FEET.
THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WILL BE AT 35 FEET
TALL.
A TOTAL OF 9 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 9 ARE BEING
PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE ACCESS IS ON EAST PALM AVENUE TO THE NORTH, AND THERE'S
AN ALLEYWAY HERE TO THE SOUTH ALSO PROVIDING VEHICULAR
ACCESS TO THE SITE.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
HERE IS THE ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH.
THE ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH.
THE ELEVATION FROM THE EAST.

AND THE ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE MYSELF AND TOOK PICTURES, I WILL
SHOW YOU WHAT I SAW.
THIS IS THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY STRUCTURE
WHICH WILL REMAIN.
THIS IS THE VACANT SITE ZONED PD, AND THAT IS TO THE EAST.
ALSO, IN THE REAR YOU WILL HAVE THAT ADDITION.
YOU WILL SEE THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND OFFICE
SPACE TO THE WEST.
IF YOU LOOK ALONG EAST PALM, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE SPACE AND
COMMERCIAL UP AND DOWN THE STREET.
THERE IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE VACANT SITE HERE.
ALSO RESIDENTIAL ACROSS THE STREET TO THE EAST.
HERE IS TO THE NORTH.
YOU WILL SEE MORE RESIDENTIAL ACROSS THE STREET.
AND MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES TO THE NORTH.
AND NORTHWEST.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE
SITE PLAN AS PER THE REVISION SHEET.
I AM HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF NEEDED.
5:54:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?

PETITIONER?
5:54:44PM >> COUNCIL MEMBERS, GOOD EVENING. WILLIAM MOORE, 325 SOUTH
BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
VERY HAPPY TO BE HERE FOR THIS PROJECT.
IT'S A SMALL ONE BUT IT'S ONE OF MY FAVORITES.
AS YOU SAW, WE ARE TAKING AN EXISTING BUILDING WHICH WAS IN
A LITTLE BIT NEED OF HELP WITH AN EXTENSIVE REHAB, AND THEN
WE ARE HERE FOR THE PD APPROVAL HOPEFULLY TO LEGITIMIZE THE
MIXED USE FOR THE BUILDING WHICH WILL BE RESIDENTIAL
UPSTAIRS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DOWNSTAIRS.
I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT, AND THANK YOU
FOR YOUR TIME.
5:55:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:55:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHAT YEAR WAS THE STRUCTURE BUILT?
PROBABLY 100 YEARS AGO IF NOT MORE?
5:55:31PM >> 1922 FROM MY CLIENT.
5:55:33PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU ARE GOING TO BE RESTORING IT?
5:55:36PM >> YES, SIR.
5:55:36PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
VERY GOOD.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5:55:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
5:55:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I JUST WANT TO SAY I APPRECIATE THAT THE USE
NOW, I THINK WE SAW THE LAST ONE AS WELL WHERE WE ARE TAKING
SPACE AND MAKING ALIVE AND WORK SPACE.

SO I APPLAUD YOU FOR MAINTAINING THE STRUCTURE HOPEFULLY
ANOTHER 100 YEARS.
5:56:07PM >> THANK YOU.
WE HOPE TO BRING MORE OF THESE.
5:56:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS?
I SEE NONE.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
5:56:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
5:56:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
5:56:26PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 407 EAST PALM AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED, AND BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
AND IN THIS APPROVAL, AND BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT, I
FIND THAT THIS APPLICATION IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SPECIFICALLY THE PROPOSED USE AND INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT
REQUESTED IN THE REZONING WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER.
HISTORIC DISTRICT AS RECEIVED FROM THE RESTORATION AND
RENOVATION OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE AND IS COMPARABLE AND
COMPATIBLE WITH THIS PORTION OF THE TAMPA BAY HEIGHTS URBAN
VILLAGE ENCOURAGED BY LAND USE POLICIES 4.2.3, 5.1.4, 9.3.1
AND 15.2.1.
I ALSO FIND THAT THIS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAND USE POLICY.
WE SEE THAT ON THE STREET, FORMER RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
BEING USED COMMERCIALLY, AND MAINTAINING THAT HISTORIC
CRITERIA, AND CHARACTER, FIND IT IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 27-136, AND THE PURPOSE OF THE SITE
PLAN CONTROLLED DISTRICT, FOR EXAMPLE, THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR ENCOURAGES
DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND
COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, WE DISCUSSED
THAT, PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFICIENT SUSTAINABLE USE OF
LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND ALSO REGARDING ANY WAIVERS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 27-139.4, THE DESIRED PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IN NEED OF A WAIVER, AND
THE WAIVER REQUESTED WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH
OR INJURE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE
AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS, AND THAT WOULD BE THE COMPLETION OF

MY MOTION.
5:58:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND WITH THE REVISION BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
5:58:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, SIR, WITH THE REVISION BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND READING.
5:58:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
5:58:39PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
5:58:41PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
5:58:43PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
5:58:44PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
5:58:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
5:58:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
5:58:47PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
5:58:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5.
FILE REZ 22-29.
5:59:01PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSED REZONING AT THE LOCATION 304, 306 AND 308
SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE PROPOSED REZONING FROM CG TO PD
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.

I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
5:59:20PM >> SAM THOMAS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, IN THE PALMA CEIA
PINES NEIGHBORHOOD, THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS 0.3 MILES,
SWANN AVENUE AND SOUTH MacDILL, THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL
FACILITY IS APPROXIMATELY 3.6 MILES SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE IN
A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS MADE UP OF COMMERCIAL USES ALONG
SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE AND TO THE EAST AND THE WEST YOU HAVE
SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, MADE UP OF SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED AND DETACHED USES.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN A COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION.
THE DESIGNATION FOR PRIMARILY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
COMMERCIAL SERVICES, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS MADE UP OF COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
ALONG SOUTH MACDILL.
THE SITE'S BROWN COLOR IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
FARTHER OVER YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND DESIGNATION
AND TO THE SOUTH RESIDENTIAL 35.
THE LIGHT BLUE COLOR IS PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC AND THAT'S AN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE SUBJECT SITE FROM
COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR TEN

SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS, UNDER THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS NO ADVERSE
IMPACTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND
CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS RELATES TO HOUSE THE CITY'S
POPULATION. THE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND AND ENSURES ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS
AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S FUTURE AND PRESENT
POPULATION.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PD PROPOSED WOULD ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT
THAT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE AND IN CHARACTER WITH THE
SURROUNDING AREA AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED
UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
6:01:34PM >> ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
6:01:36PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AS I GAVE MR. SHELBY A NEW REVISION SHEET, THESE ARE

REVISIONS FROM NATURAL RESOURCES ALSO INCLUDED AS PER THE
TREE TABLE TO THE SITE PLAN.
SO 10-13-22.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND FIRST SHOW THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE
PROPERTY.
AND THE SITE PLAN HERE.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS FOR 10 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED UNITS, 5 AND 5.
SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 22,400 SQUARE FEET OR
0.54 ACRES.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE ONE LOT
SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE AND WEST
PLATT STREET.
THE PROPOSED HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 40 FEET. A TOTAL OF 23
PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING
24 PARKING SPACES.
VEHICLE ACCESS COMES FROM THE SITE FROM SOUTH MacDILL.
I WILL USE THE OVERHEAD AERIAL.
THE SITE RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS ZONED CG.
THIS PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED WITH OFFICE SPACE.
THE PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED PD, ALSO WITH
OFFICE USE.
THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS ZONED PD.
AND THIS IS ALSO DEVELOPED WITH AN OFFICE USE, AND THE

PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE EAST IS ZONED RO-1 AND RM-16, AND
THESE LOTS ARE DEVELOPED WITH A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
AND RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES.
I WILL NOW SHOW YOU THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE THE ELEVATION NORTH AND SOUTH, THE ELEVATION HERE
FROM THE EAST AND THE WEST, ANOTHER SHOT FROM THE EAST AND
THE WEST, AND ANOTHER ELEVATION FROM THE NORTH AND THE
SOUTH.
HERE IS THE TREE TABLE THAT IS NEEDING REVISIONS ON THE
REVISION SHEET.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AS IS.
I DID PICK UP THE SIGN.
IT IS THERE.
VACANT SITE.
MORE OF THE VACANT SITE WITH OFFICE USE TO THE NORTH.
TO THE WEST YOU HAVE MORE OFFICES.
TO THE NORTH, DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE A
DENTISTRY OFFICE.
DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE AN DERMATOLOGY
OFFICE.
AS YOU LOOK SOUTH ON SOUTH MACDILL HERE, YOU WILL SEE MORE
OFFICES, MORE COMMERCIAL, YOU SEE A 7-ELEVEN THERE AT THE
INTERSECTION.
AND SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE --

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO WAIVERS.
FIRST IS A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 8-FOOT VEHICULAR
USE AREA BUFFER TO ONE FOOT TO THE WEST ALONG SOUTH MACDILL
AVENUE, AND THE SECOND WAIVER IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW FRONT
DOORS TO FACE AN INTERNAL DRIVE.
THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO BE APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS AS PER THE
REVISION SHEET AS OF 10-13-22 BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:06:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
PETITIONER?
6:06:34PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
REPRESENTING PETITIONER.
YOU MAY RECALL THAT THIS WAS DR. CASTELLANO'S MEDICAL EAR
NOSE AND THROAT OFFICE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS, ZONED
COMMERCIAL CG, AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO CONVERT THAT TO
TOWNHOUSES.
AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, IT IS 23,400 SQUARE FEET, BY
RIGHT YOU COULD BUILD 15 UNITS.
WE ARE PROPOSING TO BUILD 10 UNITS.
AND THE STAFF HAS FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND

USE CODE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS AS WELL REGARDING THE CITY
PLANNING PRINCIPLES, MIXED USE CORRIDOR PRINCIPLE, LAND
DEVELOPMENT, AND REDEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES, RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
SIZE, SCALE AND DEVELOPMENT WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY.
IN YOUR REPORT YOU WILL FIND THAT IT HAS THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH 6.1, 6.1.3, AND HOUSING
1.2 TO 1.3, LAND USE CODE, AND THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
8.14, 8.142 AND RESIDENTIAL 9.2, 9.3 TO 8.
BASICALLY, THIS IS A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AND THE SITE IS
TUCKED IN BETWEEN TWO MEDICAL OFFICE USES, AND THE PROPOSED
ACCESS IS OFF OF MacDILL, AND THE ORIENTATION OF THE
TOWNHOUSES IS THE INTERIOR SO THEY ARE NOT FACING A BUSY
STREET.
THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ALONG MacDILL IS TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL PARKING, AND WE ARE EXCEEDING THE PARKING
REQUIREMENT, 23 REQUIRED, AND WE ARE PROVIDING 24.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL.
AND AS I SAID, IT'S BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL AS CITY STAFF.
6:08:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF THE PETITIONER?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:08:38PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
A QUESTION ABOUT THE SOLID WASTE.

THERE IS AN ADJOINING SITE, WHICH IS THE SECOND --
6:08:48PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
YES, THERE'S AN ADJACENT SITE TO THE
EAST AND THEY WILL BE SHARING A DUMPSTER TO SAVE SPACE, BUT
THIS WILL BE DEALT WITH IN THE PLANNING STAGE SO IT WILL BE
REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF THE PERMITS BEING ISSUED.
6:09:03PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
BECAUSE I DIDN'T SEE ANY OTHER RESIDENTIAL
SURROUNDING IT.
6:09:07PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THERE'S A TOWNHOUSE PROJECT IMMEDIATELY
TO THE EAST.
6:09:10PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OH, BEHIND.
6:09:12PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
AND OTHERWISE WE WOULD HAVE TO BE ASKING
FOR A WAIVER EITHER ON THE MacDILL SIDE OR ON THE
BACKSIDE.
SO IN ORDER TO BE A LITTLE MORE EFFICIENT, WE COMBINED THE
PICKUP AND THE SOLID WASTE SERVICING SO THEY CAN BOTH USE IT
FROM THE REAR, AND SAVE A LOT OF SPACE.
6:09:30PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT MAKES SENSE.
I COULDN'T FIGURE OUT WHERE THE OTHER COMMUNITY WAS.
THANK YOU.
6:09:35PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
AND IT WILL BE HANDLED AT BOTH THE
PLANNING STAGE AND THE PERMITTING STAGE.
6:09:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO
THIS?
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?

MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECOND BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:09:59PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
FILE REZ 22-29, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED
FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING
PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 304, 306 AND 308 SOUTH
MACDILL AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6:10:25PM >> SECOND.
6:10:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
AND I ALSO FIND FINDINGS OF FACT BASED UPON
COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FOUND IN STAFF REPORTS, AND
APPLICANT REPORT AND TESTIMONY, THAT THIS PROJECT IS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IN
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SUCH AS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS
CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY 9.6.1, HOUSING POLICY 1.3.1
AND 1.3.4 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF
HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S PRESENT
AND FUTURE POPULATION, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL ALLOW
BETTER UTILIZATION OF LAND THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE

DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CMU-35 DESIGNATION.
IT IS ALSO IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
27-136.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR
ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN CHARACTER AND
COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND HAVING TO DO WITH THE WAIVERS, THE DESIGN OF THE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IS IN NEED OF
WAIVERS, AND THE WAIVERS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE
WITH OR INJURE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE
AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
ADDITIONALLY, WE'LL INCLUDE THE REVISED REVISION SHEET.
6:11:50PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
6:11:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
6:11:57PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
6:12:00PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
6:12:01PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
6:12:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
6:12:03PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
6:12:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
6:12:06PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER

3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
6:12:14PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
6:12:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6.
FILE REZ 22-31.
6:12:22PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS AT THE LOCATION 4848 EAST BUSCH
BOULEVARD AND 9214 NORTH HYALEAH ROAD, PROPOSED REZONING
FROM CI AND RM-24 TO PD, AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE AND
COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATION TOWER.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
6:12:46PM >> SAM THOMAS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING
DISTRICT IN THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT SITE ON
EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD.
THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS APPROXIMATELY THREE
FOURTHS OF A MILE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE AND IS NOT LOCATED
WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS COMMERCIAL IN CHARACTER WITH A MIX
OF MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY AREAS.
THE SINGLE-FAMILY AREAS ARE LOCATED TO THE NORTH AND TO THE
SOUTH OF EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD, AND YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE
MULTIFAMILY FAMILY USES WEST OF THE SITE.
FUTURE LAND USE, THE SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED AS

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION. YOU
CAN A POCKET OF THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 RIGHT THERE.
WEST OF BUSCH BOULEVARD AND RIGHT HERE SOME OF THE COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION.
THIS COLOR HERE IS RESIDENTIAL 50 DESIGNATION, AND THEN TO
THE NORTH MORE RESIDENTIAL 35.
FURTHER NORTH YOU GET INTO THE RESIDENTIAL 10 AND THEN THE
SAME WHEN YOU GO SOUTH YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL 10, RESIDENTIAL
20, AND RESIDENTIAL 35.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE 1.09 ACRES SITE
FROM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ZONING
DISTRICTS, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PERMIT A 1,000 TO 600
SQUARE FOOT STORAGE FACILITY AND FOR THE EXISTING 400 SQUARE
FOOT CELL PHONE TOWER.
THE PROPOSED STORAGE FACILITY IS ON PORTION OF THE SITE
DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND THE PD PROPOSES
1.8 F.A.R. ON THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED PORTION
WHICH IS ABOVE THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED IN THIS CATEGORY.
THE APPLICANT HAS ENTERED INTO A BONUS AGREEMENT WITH THE
CITY TO ACHIEVE THE DENSITY ON THE SITE. THE APPLICANT IS
REQUESTING A WAIVER TO REMOVE A 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL
REQUIREMENT AND TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 15-FOOT USE-TO-USE
BUFFER TO A 6-FOOT USE-TO-USE BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIRES COMMERCIAL USES TO BE

APPROPRIATELY BUFFERED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
GIVEN THAT THE ABUTTING LAND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE IS
PRESENTLY UTILIZED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES IS ZONED
RM-35 AND DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL 50 AND RESIDENTIAL 35,
MEETING THE REQUIREMENT WOULD FURTHER THE SITE'S CONSISTENCY
WITH POLICIES RELATED TO MITIGATING THE PROPOSED DENSITY.
IT DOES ADDRESS MANY OF THE MIXED USE POLICIES, ENCOURAGES
BUILDINGS TO BE ORIENTED TOWARD THE STREET BY PLACING THE
BUILDING TOWARDS THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, WITH PROPOSED
STORAGE FACILITY PLACES THE BUILDING CLOSE TO EAST BUSCH
BOULEVARD WITH ENTRANCES AND CONNECTED SIDEWALK.
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ARE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE SITE TO
HELP ENSURE PEDESTRIANS SAFELY NAVIGATE THROUGHOUT THE SITE
AND HAVE ACCESS TO TRANSIT ALONG BUSCH BOULEVARD.
OVERALL, THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE AND
COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND
CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY DIRECTIONS IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:15:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
6:15:57PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL FIRST GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, IT'S NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HYALEAH AND EAST
BUSCH.

THE PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-24 AND CI TO PD AIR
CONDITIONED STORAGE AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS TOWER,
THIS IS PROPOSED, CURRENTLY HAS A REPAIR SHOP AND ALSO YOU
HAVE A COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS TOWER, AS I WILL SHOW YOU
IN PICTURES.
APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING STRUCTURES
ON-SITE AND CONSTRUCT A 102,600 SQUARE FEET BUILDING WITH
AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE FOR A TOTAL OF 830 STORAGE UNITS.
THE THREE STORY STRUCTURE PROVIDES GROUND FLOOR PARKING,
BICYCLE PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS TO THE
SITE.
THE EXISTING CELL TOWER WILL NOT BE TOUCHED.
IT WILL STAY AS IS.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE STORAGE FACILITY IS 45 FEET IN
HEIGHT.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE VACANT LAND.
THIS LAND IS ZONED RM-24.
THERE ARE COMMERCIAL USES TO THE EAST, AND SOUTH OF THE
SITE.
THESE ARE IN THE CI AND CG ZONING DISTRICT.
TO THE WEST YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES, AND
THESE ARE ZONED RM-24.
THE SITE PLAN IDENTIFIES 43 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED AND THE

APPLICANT IS PROVIDING 19 PARKING SPACES.
THIS WILL BE ONE OF THE FIVE WAIVERS BY THE APPLICANT.
I WILL SHOW YOU THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE ELEVATIONS FROM THE NORTH.
ELEVATION FROM THE SOUTH.
ELEVATION FROM THE EAST.
AND ELEVATION FROM THE WEST.
THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING OR PROPOSING FIVE WAIVERS.
THESE WAIVERS STATE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING
FROM 43 SPACES TO 19.
IT'S A 56% REDUCTION.
NUMBER 2 IS TO REDUCE NUMBER OF LOADING BERTHS FROM 5 TO 4.
NUMBER 3 IS TO ALLOW LOADING TO OCCUR IN MORE THAN ONE
CONTINUOUS MANEUVERING AND ALLOWING MANEUVERING IN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE FOURTH WAIVER IS PROPOSED TO ALLOW THE PLACEMENT OF WALL
SIGNAGE UP TO 100 SQUARE FEET AREA ON THE WESTERN BUILDING
FACADE WHICH IS NOT ADJACENT TO THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
AND THE FIFTH AND LAST WAIVER IS PROPOSED TO REDUCE THE
USE-TO-USE BUFFER FROM THE REQUIRED 15 FEET WITH 6-FOOT
MASONRY WALL TO 6-FOOT AND NO WALL ON THE WEST.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AS
IS.
THE VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP.
MORE CARS AT THE VEHICULAR REPAIR SHOP ON-SITE.

THE SITE.
MORE CARS BEING REPAIRED.
TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, ACROSS EAST BUSCH, YOU WILL SEE
YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL ALONG THE SOUTH.
ALSO RESIDENTIAL BEHIND THAT.
TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE MORE COMMERCIAL.
AND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, BUSCH RIGHT HERE AND HYALEAH,
TO THE SOUTH MORE COMMERCIAL DOWN THE STREET.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST BE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS, FURTHER
REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:21:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
6:21:09PM >> JIM PORTER WITH ACKERMAN, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET, HERE
TODAY REPRESENTING APPLICANT.
WITH ME IS JOHN DORMAN WHO IS THE APPLICANT AND HE WILL BE
ABLE TO ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SITE PLAN
OR THE PROJECT.
I AM GOING TO ORIENT YOU TO THE SITE, EVEN THOUGH ZAIN DID A
GREAT JOB WITH THAT. THIS IS A VERY TELLING IMAGE.
THIS IS BUSCH BOULEVARD.

THIS IS HYALEAH.
AND BECAUSE OF THE CURRENT USE THERE'S A LOT OF AUTOMOBILES
ON BOTH SIDES OF HYALEAH AND IF YOU HAVE EVER BEEN OUT THERE
IT'S RATHER MESSY RIGHT NOW.
THE INTENT OF THE ZONING IS REALLY TO CLEAN UP THE
INTERSECTION AT HYALEAH AND BUSCH AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT
SITE.
THESE ARE SOME MORE IMAGES, AND YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING
CELL TOWER IN THE BACKGROUND.
SOME MORE IMAGES SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT KIND OF USE IT IS, AND
THE ROAD AND PARKING LOT THERE.
AGAIN SUBJECT SITE, THE CELL TOWER.
THIS IS LOOKING ON BUSCH TOWARDS THE EAST.
INTERSECTION OF HYALEAH AND BUSCH.
YOU CAN SEE HYALEAH.
THIS IS LOOKING DOWN HYALEAH LOOKING TOWARDS -- AWAY FROM
BUSCH BOULEVARD.
THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT SITE ON HYALEAH.
THIS IS WHAT WE PROPOSE TO DO AND WHAT THE SUBJECT SITE WILL
LOOK LIKE.
AND IF THIS IS APPROVED, YOU CAN SEE THE BUILDING HERE, THE
STORMWATER HERE.
WE ARE UTILIZING EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ON HYALEAH.
THERE'S ONE HERE NEEDED TO SERVICE THE CELL TOWER AND YOU
WILL HAVE AN IN AND OUT SECTION HERE FOR THE PEOPLE THAT

COME IN.
THE PARKING IS GOING TO BE ON-SITE AS WELL AND YOU CAN SEE
THAT WE DO A GOOD JOB WITH LANDSCAPING AND REALLY CLEANING
UP THAT INTERSECTION AND THAT PIECE OF BUSCH AND HYALEAH.
SELF STORAGE AS YOU KNOW IS A PRETTY TACIT USE FOR A
COMMERCIAL USE. IT DOESN'T GENERATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC OR
REQUIRE A LOT OF PARKING AND IT'S A GOOD FIT FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND WE ARE SEEKING A BONUS DENSITY AND IF APPROVED WE WILL
BE PAYING APPROXIMATELY 300,000 FOR A PROJECT ON 30th
STREET.
WE HAVE INTERACTED WITH THE NEIGHBORS.
THEY HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ACCESS.
THERE'S A CURRENT ACCESS ON BUSCH THAT FDOT IS NOT ALLOWING
TO US KEEP SO THE ACCESS WILL BE ON HYALEAH, SO WE FEEL IT'S
GOING TO BE AN IMPROVEMENT FROM WHAT'S THERE NOW BECAUSE
AGAIN THE USE ITSELF DOESN'T GENERATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC.
THIS CURRENT USE IS FILLED WITH CARS AND I THINK THERE ARE
PEOPLE COMING IN AND OUT.
OVERALL, WE THINK THIS IS A VERY POSITIVE IMPROVEMENT AND WE
ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT WE RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
6:23:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
6:23:53PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
JUST "HYALEAH."
6:23:58PM >>JIM PORTER:
SORRY.

6:24:01PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS THINKING.
BECAUSE I DID PLAY JAI ALAI.
6:24:08PM >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
SECOND?
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO BE SPEAK TO
THIS?
SEEING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE?
THANK YOU.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
6:24:32PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
FILE NUMBER 6, REZ 22-31.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERS, AN
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 4848
EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD AND 9214 NORTH HYALEAH ROAD IN THE CITY
OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION
1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CI COMMERCIAL
INTENSIVE AND RM-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE AND COMMERCIAL
COMMUNICATION TOWERS, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
6:25:06PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
6:25:08PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THE COMPLIANCE AND GOALS, MEETS THE
PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NONRESIDENTIAL

CHARACTER AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS OF MIXED USE AND
COMPLIANCE OF LAND USE POLICY 1.2.3 AND 15.2.1 AND 15.2.3 IN
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWS THAT
THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH
THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
TO PROMOTE THE EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY USED IN LAND
DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
FOR WAIVERS:
THE DESIGN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IN
NEED OF A WAIVER.
THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR
INJURE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED
BY WAIVERS.
AND AS FAR AS THE PARKING FOR AUTOMOBILES, I HAVE TO AGREE
THAT THESE COMMERCIAL THINGS ARE FOR PEOPLE TO COME IN, AND
RENT, THEY DON'T ALL SHOW UP AT ONE TIME.
THEY HAVE UNITS, AND I HAVE SEEN THEM ALL OVER THE CITY, AND
IT DOES WORK WITH MUCH LESS PARKING BECAUSE THEY ARE IN AND
OUT.
ANYTHING ELSE THAT I CAN SAY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING? ALL THE WAIVERS THAT NEED TO BE CLEARED BY THEN.
6:26:23PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
6:26:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.

ROLL CALL VOTE.
6:26:27PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
6:26:30PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
6:26:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
6:26:32PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
6:26:33PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
6:26:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
6:26:35PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
6:26:38PM >>JIM PORTER:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL. AND I WILL PRACTICE MY
PRONUNCIATION FOR SECOND READING.
6:26:42PM >>THE CLERK:
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
6:26:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
6:26:47PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 7, CASE REZ 22-35, AT
LOCATION 4208 WEST CARMEN STREET, PROPOSED REZONING FROM
RS-50 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:27:22PM >>SAM THOMAS:
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE WESTSHORE PLANNING
DISTRICT IN THE WEST SHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS A QUARTER MILE NORTHEAST OF THE
SITE AND THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS APPROXIMATELY
ONE FOURTH OF A MILE SOUTH, WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION
ZONE.

HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
YOU CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA IS LARGELY MADE UP OF
MULTIFAMILY ATTACHED UNITS, WITH A LITTLE BIT OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
ONCE YOU MOVE TO THE EAST OF LOIS AVENUE, IT ENTERS INTO
MORE OF A SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED NEIGHBORHOOD AND TO THE
NORTH IS 275.
THE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE.
YOU SEE IT'S RESIDENTIAL 20.
THERE ARE SOME POCKETS OF RESIDENTIAL 35 TO THE SOUTH AND ON
THE OTHER SIDE OF LOIS AVENUE IS RESIDENTIAL 10 WHICH IS WHY
YOU SEE MORE OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES OVER THERE,
AND THEN TO THE NORTH ON THE OTHER SIDE OF 275 IS THE
REGIONAL MIXED USE 100 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONING 0.24 ACRES FROM
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW
FOR FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS PORTION OF CARMEN STREET HAS AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF 16.7
UNITS PER ACRE.
THE EXISTING BLOCK DENSITY INDICATED IS UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSES 16 UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH IS
BELOW THE EXISTING BLOCK DENSITY AND THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED

UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL PROVIDE FOR IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT
ON UNDERUTILIZED LAND THAT IS IN PROXIMATE LOCATION TO
TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. THE PROPOSED REZONING
WILL FURTHER THE POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
THAT PROVIDES COMPATIBLE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AN AREA
OF PLAN FOR MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING TYPES AND WOULD
NOT ALTER THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF THE
WEST SHORE PALM NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY
QUESTIONS.
6:29:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
6:29:23PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
I WILL GO AHEAD FIRST AND SHARE THE SITE
PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE HERE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE PROPERTY WITH ONE BUILDING AND FOUR UNITS.
HERE IS A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES SO THE
SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 10,306 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.24
ACRES.
IT IS LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST CARMEN STREET
AND NORTH LOIS AVENUE, SOUTH OF 275, AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE
AERIAL VIEW TO COME.
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED CURRENTLY WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLING UNIT.

THE PROPOSED HEIGHT BY THE APPLICANT IS 40 FEET IN HEIGHT.
A TOTAL OF 9 PARKING SPACINGS ARE REQUIRED AND 9 SPACES ARE
BEING PROVIDED.
VEHICLE INGRESS AND EGRESS IS PROVIDED ON WEST CARMEN
STREET.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE, THE SITE HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY SEVERAL RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND
HOUSING TYPES.
PROPERTIES FURTHER TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ACROSS WEST
CARMEN IS ZONED RS-50.
THESE ARE DEVELOPED WITH A STORMWATER RETENTION POND AND
ALSO INTERSTATE 275.
THERE'S A RETENTION POND.
PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY EAST AND WEST OF THE SITE IS ZONED
RM-18.
AND THESE PROPERTIES ARE DEVELOPED WITH A RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
THE PROPERTIES SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE ZONED RS-50,
AND THESE ARE DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
YOU SEE THE ELEVATION TO THE WEST.
ELEVATION TO THE EAST.
ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH.
AND ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.

AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES I WILL SHOW YOU
WHAT I SAW.
THIS IS THE SITE AS IS WITH THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE WE'LL HAVE A RETENTION POND RIGHT
HERE, 275 ALSO TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE.
ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE SITE WITH THE RETENTION POND AND 275.
TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE THE RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURE.
AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE MORE RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES AND ONE BEING BUILT AT THIS TIME.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISION TO THE SITE
PLAN ON THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
THANK YOU.
6:33:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
PETITIONER?
6:33:25PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
I THINK ZAIN HAS OUTLINED AND SHOWN YOU WHAT A BEAUTIFUL
VIEW IT IS TO THE NORTH WITH THE INTERSTATE AND THE
RETENTION POND.

THIS IS A COMPATIBLE IN-FILL PROJECT WHICH IS SURROUNDED ON
BOTH THE EAST AND THE WEST BY OTHER MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOUSE
STYLE DEVELOPMENTS.
IT IS BELOW THE DENSITY THAT'S ALLOWED FOR THIS LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
IT IS ALSO DESIGNATED AS ONE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A TRANSITION BETWEEN HEAVY COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR OF THE INTERSTATE, THE POTENTIAL OF A TRANSIT
CORRIDOR ON LOIS, AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES TO THE SOUTH
OF HERE.
ALSO A LITTLE BIT TO THE EAST.
IT'S DESIGNATED AS R-20 DESIGNATED AREA, AND WE ARE
PROPOSING TO DEVELOP IT 16 UNITS PER ANGER WHICH IS LESS
THAN WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF FOUND IT TO BE
COMPATIBLE AND THERE'S A NUMBER OF POLICIES THAT ARE
OUTLINED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, WHICH INDICATES THAT IT IS
COMPATIBLE WITH THE IN-FILL, AND UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTY,
IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE HOUSING ELEMENT THAT'S ALSO
CONTAINED IN YOUR REPORT, AND IT'S DESIGNED TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL HOUSING THAT OTHERWISE WOULD REMAIN VACANT.
IT'S A GREAT AREA IN TERMS OF BEING TRANSITIONAL BETWEEN THE
INTERSTATE 75, I-275, AND ALL OF THOSE AREAS TO THE SOUTH
AND TO THE EAST.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

THERE'S NINE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.
AS YOU KNOW, PARKING TENDS TO BE A LITTLE TOUCHY WHEN IT
COMES TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
AND WE ARE PROVIDING NINE SPACES AS PER THE CODE.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
6:35:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:35:26PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE SITE PLAN AND
THE ELEVATION.
THE SITE PLAN SHOWED FRONT ENTRANCE OFF OF THE MAIN STREET,
AND THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW THAT.
6:35:43PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, IT DOESN'T FACE THE STREET.
IT'S A SIDE ROAD PROJECT.
6:35:49PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THE FIRST ONE THAT LOOKS AT 275 HAD A DOOR
ON THE SIDE WITH THE SIDEWALK.
I REALLY LIKED THAT, THOUGHT, WELL, THAT MAKES A LOT OF
SENSE, BUT I DIDN'T SEE THAT ON THE ELEVATION.
6:36:06PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
I THINK WHAT YOU WERE SEEING THERE WAS
THE SIDEWALK.
6:36:24PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT'S NOT THE -- THAT'S THE LAST ONE.
NO, THIS ONE, OKAY.
I HAD A LOT OF THESE TONIGHT.
6:36:32PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THERE IS ONE WAIVER, AND THAT'S TO REQUEST TO ALLOW FRONT
DOOR FOR 2, 3 AND 4 TO FACE A SIDEWALK LINE RATHER THAN AN

INTERNAL COURTYARD.
SO WE DID HAVE ONE PROPOSED WAIVER FOR THIS APPLICATION.
6:36:46PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
SO THEN -- DO YOU HAVE THE SITE PLANS?
6:36:51PM >> YES.
6:36:52PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THE ONE FACES --
6:37:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
SO I SAW THAT AND I THOUGHT, OH, THAT LOOKS GREAT.
BUT THE ELEVATION DOES NOT MATCH IT.
ALL THE FRONT DOORS ARE SHOWN FACING IN INSTEAD OF THE SIDE.
THAT'S THE ONE ON THE SIDE.
6:37:21PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WE CAN CORRECT THE ELEVATION BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND READING.
6:37:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES, BECAUSE I THINK THAT WAS SUCH A NICE
CUT SO I APPRECIATE THAT.
I WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FOR INCLUDING THAT FRONT.
THANK YOU.
6:37:40PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THANK YOU.
6:37:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS?
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
6:37:52PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
6:37:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?

THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
6:37:59PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER 7, FILE
REZ 22-35, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 4208 WEST CARMEN STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AND BASED ON THE STAFF REPORTS, I WOULD LIKE TO READ INTO
THE RECORD THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH
HOUSING POLICIES 1.3.1 AND 1.3.4 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW
HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO MANGE SURE THAT
AN ADEQUATE HOUSING SUPPLY IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF
TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS, ALSO AS STATED BY
THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL ALLOW A DENSITY 16 UNITS PER
ACRE WHICH IS BELOW THE EXISTING LOT DENSITY OF THE PORTION
OF WEST CARMEN STREET AND THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED IN THE
RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON
THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH
THE SURROUND BEING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND

THEREFORE IN NEED OF A WAIVER.
THE REQUESTED WAIVER WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH
OR INJURE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WOULD BE
AFFECTED.
I THINK THE ONE THING I READ, ALLOW A DENSITY OF 16 BUT THEY
ARE ASKING FOR LESS THAN THAT.
THANK YOU.
6:39:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
6:39:38PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
6:39:40PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
6:39:42PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
6:39:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
6:39:43PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
6:39:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
6:39:46PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
6:39:51PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
ALSO THANKS FOR THE CATCH ON THE ELEVATION.
WE'LL FIX THAT.
6:39:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9.

FILE REZ 22-92.
6:40:03PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSED REZONING IS AT A LOCATION 209 AND 211 SOUTH
GOMEZ AVENUE.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-16 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED.
I WILL NOW PASS ONTO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
6:40:20PM >> SAM THOMAS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE FUTURE TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICT, IN THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD, TRANSIT SERVICE IS
PROVIDED ALONG WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD LOCATED TO THE NORTH
OF THE SITE, THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS
APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE TO THE SOUTHEAST AND THE SITE IS IN A
LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS A MIXTURE OF USES, MITCHELL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SITE. THERE'S A
MIXTURE OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AS WELL AS
MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS IN THE VICINITY, KENNEDY
BOULEVARD LOCATED TWO BLOCKS NORTH OF THE SITE AND THEN
MACDILL AVENUE LOCATED TWO BLOCKS WEST OF THE SITE, AND BOTH
CORRIDORS HAVE A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, RESIDENTIAL 20
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE MAJORITY OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS IS ALSO RECOGNIZED AS
RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. YOU CAN SEE

MITCHELL SCHOOL, PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION, TO THE
SOUTH RESIDENTIAL 35 LAND USE DESIGNATION, ALONG MacDILL
AVENUE AND YOU HAVE BETWEEN COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 AND THEN
NORTH ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD YOU HAVE THE URBAN MIXED USE
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 0.5 ACRES FROM
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR
TEN RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE ATTACHED.
THE PROPOSED PD WILL PROVIDE THE POTENTIAL FOR OPTIONS FOR
TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND THE PD IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT LARGELY CONSISTS OF
MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF MITCHELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MOST OF
THIS PORTION OF SOUTH GOMEZ AVENUE, AN AVERAGE OF
CALCULATION CONDUCTED ON THE PARCELS TO THE SOUTH OF THE
SUBJECT SITE FROM WEST AZEELE TO WEST PLATT STREET, THE
EXISTING AVERAGE DENSITY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AREA IS 12.77
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS BELOW THE DENSITY
ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION. IF APPROVED, THE PD WILL ALLOW FOR DENSITY OF
10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHICH CONSISTENT WITH THE
LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUPPORTS SEVERAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNED POLICIES SUCH AS PROMOTING RESIDENTIAL

IN-FILL IN APPROPRIATE AREAS, ESPECIALLY WITHIN THE AREAS OF
EMPLOYMENT TRANSIT OPTIONS.
THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:42:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
6:42:57PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
FIRST, I WILL SHOW THE SITE PLANS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS PROPERTY IS AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST
PLATT STREET AND SOUTH GOMEZ.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
PROPERTY WITH 10 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 21,826
SQUARE FEET, OR .50 ACRES.
THE SITE PLAN IDENTIFIES TWO BUILDINGS FOR A TOTAL GROSS
BUILDING AREA OF 11,520 SQUARE FEET.
THE PROPOSED PARKING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 23 PARKING
SPACES.
THE PROPOSED HEIGHT IS 40 FEET IN HEIGHT.
AND VEHICULAR ACCESS COMES FROM THE SOUTH ON WEST PLATT
STREET.
I WILL SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
YOU SEE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
PLATT TO THE SOUTH.
SOUTH GOMEZ TO THE EAST.

TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
IT IS ZONED RM-16.
TO THE SOUTH IS ALSO RM-16 WITH RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
TO THE WEST ARE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES ZONED RM-16, AND
TO THE EAST IS AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ZONED RM-16.
I WILL NOW PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
TO THE EAST AND WEST.
ALSO ELEVATIONS FROM THE EAST AND WEST.
ELEVATIONS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, TOOK PICTURES.
YOU WILL SEE WHAT'S CURRENTLY ON THE SITE.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
ALSO, ON THE SITE YOU HAVE PLATT RIGHT HERE.
I'M ON GOMEZ RIGHT NOW.
WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY.
AS YOU SEE HERE, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU WILL SEE RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY.
AS I AM ON GOMEZ RIGHT HERE, YOU WILL SEE THE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL HERE TO MY LEFT, AND THE SUBJECT SITE TO MY RIGHT,
AND YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY
RUNNING UP AND DOWN.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE ON GOMEZ RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY, AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
AND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE THE ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL I SPOKE OF.
THERE IS ONE WAIVER BEING REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, AND
THESE TO HAVE BEEN ALLOW FRONT DOORS TO FACE THE INTERNAL
DRIVE AISLE AND NOT A STREET RIGHT OF WAY OR COMMON
COURTYARD.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT SHALL CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE
SITE PLAN AS PER THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:47:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
6:47:48PM >>RYAN MANASSE:
GOOD EVENING. I'M RYAN MANASSE WITH
JOHNSON POPE LAW FIRM. I'M THEIR DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT
AND PLANNING, LOCATED AT 401 EAST JACKSON STREET, SUITE
3100, TAMPA 33602, HERE TONIGHT REPRESENTING THE OWNER OF
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 209 AND 211 SOUTH GOMEZ, AND THE
REQUEST BEFORE YOU FOR RM-16 TO PD FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED USE.
THIS IS CONSISTENT AS ZAIN ALLUDED TO OR STATED WITH TEN
DWELLING UNITS.
IT'S BEEN LEARNED IN SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS SO I

WILL GO TO MY MAPS AND PRESENTATION MATERIAL.
WHAT I HAVE ON SCREEN THERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE SO YOU ARE
GOING TO SEE IN THE DARK BLUE IS THE SUBJECT SITE CURRENTLY
HAS TWO EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
AND IN THAT LIGHTER BLUE COLORATION THAT'S THROUGHOUT THE
CENTER OF AZEELE AND KENNEDY AND MacDILL IS THE
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND
SEMI-DETACHED FOR THOSE TOWN HOME STYLE AND THE DUPLEX STYLE
DWELLING UNITS.
THEN THE REMAINING PARCEL THAT YOU SEE THERE THAT ARE COLOR
CODED ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES SO PREDOMINANTLY
THE INTERIOR AREA ARE THOSE MULTIFAMILY AND TOWN HOME STYLE
USES.
AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THIS AREA YOU ARE GOING TO SEE THE
RED COLORATION.
THOSE ARE NONRESIDENTIAL USES THAT CONSIST OF COMMERCIAL TO
THE NORTH ALONG KENNEDY AS WELL AS GOING DOWN MacDILL
FROM NORTH TO SOUTH, AND THEN ALONG AZEELE STREET YOU HAVE
THIS RO ZONING DISTRICT WRITE HAS SOME NONRESIDENTIAL USES
AS WELL OUTLINED IN RED.
SO THE AERIAL ON SCREEN, I PROVIDED THIS AND OUTLINED THE
SUBJECT SITE IN RED AND THAT'S TO GIVE YOU MORE OF A
PERSPECTIVE ON THE MAP AND THE SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOOD TO INCLUDE THE BLOCK THAT THIS PROJECT IS
PROPOSED ON.

YOU WILL NOTICE THAT FROM SOME OF THE STAFF HAS PREVIOUSLY
STATED YOU HAVE MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTH AS WELL AS TO THE
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE WEST YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS, RM-16
WHICH WOULD BE IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST ON THIS PROPERTY AND
THIS PROPERTY, AND THIS IS ACTUALLY ZONED RM-18, HIGHER
DENSITY THAN THE CURRENT RM-16.
YOU CAN SEE THE NEW DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE TOWNHOMES WITH
THESE GARAGES ACCESS DIRECTLY ONTO THE STREET.
ADDITIONALLY, THIS AERIAL PROVIDES COMPATIBILITY SHOWING
THAT WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TONIGHT IS COMPATIBLE IN
CHARACTER WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT'S PREDOMINANTLY THIS MULTIFAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
AND SEMI ATTACHED NEIGHBORHOOD.
TO BRIEFLY GO OVER THE ZONING MAP, THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN
RED AND AGAIN FOR THE RECORD, IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST YOU
HAVE THIS POCKET OF RM-18.
THEN YOU HAVE RM-16 THAT SURROUNDS IT, SOME PDS THROUGHOUT.
YOU WILL SEE THE CG USES ALONG KENNEDY, CI USE, AND THESE
ARE THOSE OFFICE USES YOU MAY HAVE HEARD ABOUT TONIGHT, MOST
OF THEM MEDICAL OFFICES, AND THEN ALONG AZEELE RO USES WHICH
ARE MORE OF MORE INTENSE THAN THE SINGLE-FAMILY.
AND THIS IS JUST THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
AGAIN, OUR SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED AS YOU WILL SEE
IT'S IN THE CENTER OF AN R-20 DESIGNATED AREA WHICH THE

MEDIUM DENSITY 20 DWELLING UNITS PECK ERROR.
YOU WILL SEE THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST
AND THEN THESE HIGHER DENSITY LAND USE CATEGORIES THAT
SURROUND THE AREA, I WANT TO SHOW YOU THIS, BECAUSE I THINK
SAM ALLUDED TO, THESE RESIDENTIAL 10 CATEGORIES WHICH ARE
MORE PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, THE SINGLE-FAMILY
STRUCTURES.
TO GO OVER THE SITE PLAN THERE ARE 23 PARKING SPACES
REQUIRED, WE ARE REQUIRING 23, FOUR OF THOSE FOR THE
VISITORS, THERE'S A SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER TO THE NORTH WITH
ACCESS ONTO THE SOUTH GOMEZ AVENUE.
THEN AS YOU WILL SEE THE LAYOUT THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS WITH
VEHICULAR ACCESS ONTO PLATT STREET.
THE FRONT DOORS ARE ORIENTED TO THE ROAD SO ALONG GOMEZ YOU
HAVE THE FRONT DOORS THAT ARE OUTLINED ON THE SITE PLAN, AND
THEN ALSO ON WEST PLATT SO THESE INTERIOR UNITS ARE THE ONES
THAT DO NOT FACE THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
SOMETHING TO POINT OUT THAT I KNOW THE DESIGN COMES TO YOU A
LOT, BUT SOMETHING TO POINT OUT IS THAN THAT THIS DESIGN
WILL LIMIT THE INTRUSION OF DRIVEWAYS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN
THERE IN A DIFFERENT KIND OF DESIGN.
SO INSTEAD OF HAVING THE UNITS TO GOMEZ RIGHT NEXT TO THE
SCHOOL YOU NOW HAVE THE UNIMPEDED SIDEWALKS ALONG GOMEZ WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER, AND THEN ALSO THE
ACCESS POINT HERE.

SOMETHING I THOUGHT TOO IS ACTUALLY INTERESTING, THE TWO
EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ACTUALLY HAVE MORE ACCESS
POINTS THAN WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING HERE TONIGHT.
SO I THINK THAT DEMONSTRATES THE COMPATIBILITY AGAIN,
BRINGING IN SAFETY ISSUES OF THE SCHOOL IMMEDIATELY TO THE
EAST, AND OVERALL THE COMPARABILITY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF HAS FOUND IT CONSISTENT
INCLUDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
WE MEET SEVERAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES THAT SUPPORT THE
IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT, HOUSING, DIFFERENT TYPES OF HOUSING
STOCKS FOR THE GROWING USE OF TAMPA, AND WITH THAT WE WOULD
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL, AND I WOULD BE AVAILABLE
FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
6:53:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
6:53:21PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS.
I REALLY DO APPRECIATE FACING SOME OF THESE UNITS TOWARD THE
STREET ESPECIALLY WITH AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RIGHT ACROSS THE
STREET.
IT'S APPARENTLY A WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD, EVEN IF THERE ARE A
LOT OF CARS THERE.
I APPRECIATE THE ATTENTION TO THAT DETAIL.
6:53:41PM >>RYAN MANASSE:
THANK YOU.
6:53:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO

THIS?
ANYONE ONLINE?
6:53:51PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
6:53:54PM >> SECOND.
6:53:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
VIERA.
6:54:04PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF THE 209 AND 211 SOUTH GOMEZ AVENUE IN THE CITY
OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED FROM
SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THIS INCLUDES ANY REVISIONS THAT MAY BE SHOWN ON THE
REVISION SHEET.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF TO DEVELOPMENT
CONDITIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND CITY
CODE, AND FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVER IF ANY DO NOT
ADVERSELY AFFECT OR IMPACT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND
GENERAL WELFARE.
I ALSO ADOPT THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ALL

CITY STAFF REPORTS.
6:54:48PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
6:54:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT INCLUDES THE WAIVERS AND THE REVISION?
6:54:52PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.
6:54:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
I HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
6:55:00PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
6:55:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
6:55:03PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
6:55:04PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
6:55:05PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
6:55:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
6:55:08PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH GUDES BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
3rd, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
6:55:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
6:55:21PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES, SIR, A COUPLE.
ONE, I NEED TO ASK TO RECEIVE AND FILE MY FORM FROM LAST
WEEK.

IT WAS FOR ITEM NUMBER 93 AND 98 WHICH I DISCLOSED LAST WEEK
WHAT MY CONFLICT WAS, BUT THERE WAS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS
CONNECTED TO THIS, AND ALTHOUGH MY FIRM DOES BUSINESS WITH
THE INDIVIDUAL BUT NOT ON THIS PROJECT, BUT OUT OF A BUN
DANCE OF CAUTION AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE ATTORNEYS, I
RECUSED MYSELF.
AND THEN THAT WAS 93 AND -- NUMBER 66 WAS RELATED TO THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND MY FIRM WORKS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
SO I RECUSED MYSELF.
I WOULD LOVE MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
6:56:13PM >> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
6:56:17PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ALSO, JUST TWO OTHER QUICK THINGS.
NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY SPECIFIC PROJECT, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME
THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS OF THE CITY THAT ARE ON THE
FRINGES OF AREAS WHERE BUILDINGS ARE ALLOWED TO GO TO THE
F.A. HEIGHT LIMIT.
AND IT SEEMS THAT WE SHOULD GET STAFF TO REPORT TO US IF
THERE ARE AREAS THAT WE SHOULD UPDATE THAT WOULD ENABLE A
DEVELOPER TO GO UP TO THE F.A. LIMIT.
AS WE ARE TALKING TO CERTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS, THEY DON'T WANT
GROWTH, DON'T WANT DENSITY.
WE HAVE GOT TO HAVE DENSITY GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.
AND INSTEAD OF MAKING DEVELOPERS SPEND A LOT OF MONEY TRYING

TO BUILD HIGHER, IT SEEMS THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS ON
THE FRINGES OF MAYBE WESTSHORE OR CHANNEL DISTRICT OR DALE
MABRY WHERE IT MIGHT MAKE SENSE.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TO ASK STAFF TO REPORT ON JANUARY
19th AS TO RECOMMENDED AREAS OF THE CITY SUCH AS CHANNEL
DISTRICT AND PARTS OF DALE MABRY NORTH OF KENNEDY WHERE
ZONING MIGHT BE CHANGED TO SET THE HEIGHT LIMIT TO THE F.A.
LIMIT.
6:57:34PM >> SECOND.
6:57:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
6:57:46PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ONE LAST ONE.
WE TALKED SOME ABOUT NAMING.
AND HERE IS THE MOTION I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE REGARDING THIS.
WE CAN TALK ABOUT THIS ALSO ON THE CHARTER REVIEW
DISCUSSION.
BUT JUST -- I SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH MARTY AND OTHER
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS LOOKING AT THIS, AND LET ME READ.
THIS I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TO ASK LEGAL STAFF TO RETURN ON
NOVEMBER 17th WITH A DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT WOULD CODIFY
THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED PROCESS FOR NAMING BUILDINGS, ROADS,
STRUCTURES AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY, AND TO ESTABLISH AN
APPROVAL PROCESS THAT WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR
AND A SUPER MAJORITY FIVE VOTES OF CITY COUNCIL.

6:58:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SECOND.
6:58:33PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE IDEA HERE IS THAT THE CHARTER REALLY IS
SILENT AS TO WHO HAS THE POWER TO NAME.
I SHOWED LAST WEEK THE MAYOR HAS THE RIGHT TO ADMINISTER
BUILDINGS BUT DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELL BUILDINGS OR
EVEN APPROVE THEM WITHOUT OUR APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS.
SO THE CHARTER ALSO SAYS THAT AN EXECUTIVE ORDER CANNOT BE
IN CONFLICT WITH AN ORDINANCE.
SO IT SEEMS TO ME WHEN A CHARTER IS SILENT WE SHOULD HAVE
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL APPROVE SOMETHING, AND IN THIS
CASE IF WE ARE GOING TO NAME SOMETHING, I THINK WE SCHIFF WE
SHOULD HAVE A SUPER MAJORITY.
I THINK IT SHOULD BE -- IF YOU VOTE YES ON THIS YOU ARE NOT
VOTING TO IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE, YOU ARE JUST ASKING
LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO COME BACK ON NOVEMBER 17th WITH A
PROPOSED ORDINANCE.
WE CAN DEBATE IT THEN.
6:59:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
MS. WELLS.
6:59:29PM >>CATE WELLS:
THANK YOU.
JUST A QUESTION FOR COUNCIL.
IF YOU WOULD CONSIDER PERHAPS A LATER DATE.
THE REASON I SUGGEST THAT, LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THAT WE
ALREADY HAVE ON COUNCIL'S AGENDA, THE WORKSHOP THAT IS

SCHEDULED, AND LOOKING AT THE INTERNAL TIMING OF FILING
THESE DOCUMENTS IN ADVANCE OF YOUR MEETING, NOVEMBER
17th IS A LITTLE -- THAT WOULD BE A QUICK TURNAROUND
TIME SO I AM ASKING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION ON THE TIME.
6:59:56PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND?
6:59:57PM >>CATE WELLS:
YOU CAN HELP ME WITH THE NEXT REGULAR
MEETING.
7:00:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
DECEMBER 15th IS GOOD.
7:00:06PM >>CATE WELLS:
THANK YOU.
7:00:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT'S YOUR LAST MEETING BEFORE VACATION.
7:00:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DECEMBER 15th IS FINE WITH YOU,
COUNCILMAN CARLSON?
7:00:19PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
I MODIFY MY MOTION.
7:00:21PM >>LUIS VIERA:
MY CONCERN ON THIS IS IT'S COMING BACK WITH
AN ORDINANCE AS OPPOSED TO -- IF THERE WAS A REPORT I COULD
SEE DECIDING IT AT A LATER DATE.
MY ONLY CONCERN WITH HAVING -- AND NOW WE ARE STARTING TO
DEAL, BUT HAVING A SUPER MAJORITY FOR THINGS LIKE NAMING
YOUR BUILDINGS, ET CETERA, MAY GET INTO A LOT OF POLITICAL
PAROCHIAL FIGHTS ON TAMPA CITY COUNCIL, BUT, YOU KNOW, IF
YOU WOULD CHANGE IT, BUT MAYBE TO DO IT AS A REPORT AS
OPPOSED TO AN ORDINANCE, I COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT BUT
WITH GREAT RES HESITATION, AND DON'T WANT TO GIVE ANY
CONCLUSION OUT, IT'S JUST SOMETHING I WOULD HAVE GREAT

SKEPTICISM ON, LET'S SAY.
JUST PUTTING THAT OUT THERE.
7:01:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA?
7:01:14PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I AM JUST LISTENING TO BOTH SIDES.
I UNDERSTAND BOTH SIDES PRETTY WELL.
I THINK THE ONLY TIME THAT COUNCIL EVER USED A SUPER
MAJORITY IS TO OVERRIDE THE MAYOR.
7:01:26PM >>BILL CARLSON:
A SIMPLE MAJORITY?
IF I COULD TAKE OUT THE SUPER MAJORITY?
7:01:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES, THAT'S FINE.
I AM NOT SAYING YOU ARE RIGHT OR WRONG.
I AM JUST SAYING WE ON COUNCIL NEVER USED THAT.
7:01:38PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SO I WILL TAKE OUT THE SUPER MAJORITY PART.
7:01:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
ALSO IN THE SAME VEIN AS COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, I WOULD LIKE TO
HAVE THIS AS A REPORT AND THEN WE CAN GO FROM THERE.
7:01:51PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MIRANDA?
7:01:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LUIS, PLEASE.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
I AM ON THE SAME VEIN AS YOU, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
I WOULD MUCH RATHER HAVE THE REPORT RATHER THAN AN
ORDINANCE.
7:02:08PM >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I JUST SAY I AM NOT ASKING FOR FIRST
READING OF THE ORDINANCE.
I AM JUST ASKING FOR THEM TO DRAFT ONE FOR US TO DISCUSS AND

DEBATE.
THAT'S ALL.
7:02:16PM >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY.
WITH THAT GREAT HESITATION WITH, THAT GREAT -- WITH
COLLEGIALITY I WILL MOVE THIS FORWARD, BUT AGAIN WHEN IT
COMES, I PROBABLY WON'T WANT THAT UNDER COUNCIL'S DIRECT
JURISDICTION TO THAT EXTENT.
BUT I WILL MOVE THAT FORWARD FOR COLLEGIALITY.
THAT'S FINE.
7:02:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND WE HAVE AN AMENDED MOTION BY COUNCILMAN
CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:02:41PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
7:02:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
7:02:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
A COUPLE THINGS.
MY FIRST MOTION IS A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, TO
SET AN ADOPTION FOR TA/CPA 22-13 AND TA/CPA 22-24 ON
DECEMBER 1st, 2022 AT 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT LEGAL
DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK WITH A FORM OF NOTICE
ADVERTISING THE HEARING.
7:03:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN --
7:03:10PM >>> DECEMBER 1st AT 5:
01.
YES, SIR.
7:03:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?

7:03:17PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE SECOND MOTION IS A REQUEST FROM
PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET A TRANSMITTAL HEARING FOR TA/CPA
22-08 ON DECEMBER 8, 2022 AT 501 P.M. AND DIRECT LEGAL
DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK FOR A FORM OF NOTICE
ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
7:03:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:03:34PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HAVE ANOTHER MOTION OF A REQUEST FOR
THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR TA/CPA 22-12, TA/CPA 22-14,
TA/CPA 22 16, TA/CPA 22 17, TA/CPA 22 18, TA/CPA 22 19,
TA/CPA 22-20, TA/CPA 22-22 AND TA/CPA 22 23, ON JANUARY 26,
2023 AT 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE
CITY CLERK WITH FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
7:04:10PM >> SECOND.
7:04:13PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
HOW MANY ARE THERE?
7:04:15PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NINE.
NINE.
7:04:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:04:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE LAST MOTION FOR THIS REQUEST FOR
PLANNING COMMISSION TA/CPA 22-08 ON FEBRUARY 23rd, 2022
AT 501 PM AND DIRECT LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY
CLERK WITH FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC

HEARING.
23, I'M SORRY, FEBRUARY 23rd, 2023.
7:04:44PM >> SECOND.
7:04:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
OR VIERA.
[ LAUGHTER ]
I KNOW, I'M SORRY.
I WASN'T GOING TO SAY ANYTHING.
COUNCILMAN VIERA, I AM SO SORRY.
7:05:04PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
DON'T DO IT, THEN DO IT.
I DON'T CARE.
7:05:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:05:16PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE LAST ITEM MADAM CLERK IS I WOULD
LIKE SHERISHA HILLS FROM PARK AND REC TO GIVE A REPORT ON
THE STATUS OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
IT'S REALLY A MODULAR UNIT AT HENRY AND OLA PARK. WE
RECEIVED COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD
REGARDING AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS AND THAT WOULD BE FOR
DECEMBER 15th UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
7:05:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.

ALL IN FAVOR?
7:05:47PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
EVERYONE IS WELCOME -- [OFF MICROPHONE]
7:05:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
7:05:59PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
[OFF MICROPHONE] -- TO PRESENT A
COMMENDATION TO MS. DELIA COLEMAN WHO SERVED AS A CHAPLAIN
FOR THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR OVER 17 YEARS, SHE'S
ALSO PROVIDED THE INVOCATION FOR THIS COUNCIL SEVERAL TIMES,
HAS MOVED TO ALABAMA, AND I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S MONTGOMERY OR
BIRMINGHAM, BUT WE WILL BE SENDING IT TO HER.
7:06:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I SECOND THAT MOTION.
7:06:22PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SHE HAD TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE RENTAL UNIT
GAVE HER A NOTICE OF ONLY 30 DAYS.
A FAMILY MEMBER WAS MOVING IN.
7:06:33PM >>LUIS VIERA:
SECONDED BY CHAIRMAN CITRO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
AND REALLY QUICK, IF I MAY, I MOTION FOR A COMMENDATION TO
OUR FRIENDS AT THE SULPHUR SPRINGS YMCA, HELD OUTSIDE OF
CITY HALL, FOR ALL THE WORK THEY DO AT SULPHUR SPRINGS
ELEMENTARY.
7:06:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:06:55PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I MOTION FOR A COMMENDATION TO BAY AREA LEGAL

SERVICES FOR 40 YEARS OF VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM TO BE
GIVEN OCTOBER 20th at their office.
7:07:07PM >> Seconded by councilman Miranda.
All in favor?
7:07:10PM >>LUIS VIERA:
Do we all know Lisa Bunn, the police officer,
wonderful lady, does a lot of work with people with
disabilities.
She's going to retire.
I would like her to come on November 8th FOR A
COMMENDATION FOR HER SERVICE, IF I MAY.
THAT'S A COMMENDATION DAY.
7:07:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
7:07:33PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TWO REPORTS.
NEXT WEEK WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT ON THE 50th ANNIVERSARY
OF HIRING THE FIRST FEMALE POLICE OFFICER OF TPD, OFFICER
LENORA BOOTH AND I WANT TO HAVE AS PART OF THE MOTION THAT
HER DAUGHTER CLARA REYNOLDS COME AND SPEAK WHOM MANY OF US
KNOW FROM THE CRISIS CENTER.
NOT GOING TO SPEAK.
SHE'S GOING TO BE HERE.
IT'S AN EXISTING REPORT.
7:08:06PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
7:08:07PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
7:08:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.

ALL IN FAVOR?
7:08:10PM >>LUIS VIERA:
NEXT I HAVE AN ITEM ON FIRE STATION 24 AND
25.
I WANT TO MOVE THAT TO NOVEMBER 3rd BECAUSE IT'S
REPETITIVE.
ON NOVEMBER 3rd WE HAVE THE STATUS OF OUR RESPONSE TIME
FROM 33647 AND I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THAT, GET RID OF NEXT
WEEK'S REPORT ON FIRE STATIONS 24 AND 25 AND AMEND NEXT WEEK
TO INCLUDE THE STATUS OF STATION 24 ALONG WITH LAND
PURCHASING.
AND THAT'S IT.
7:08:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
THANK YOU.
AT THIS TIME, I MOVE TO REVISE THE MOTION I HAD MADE ON
9-23-2022 REGARDING THE FILE CM 22-77653, THE TPO 2022
APPORTIONMENT PLAN TO NOW READ AS FOLLOWS:
I MOTION TO REQUEST THE TPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MS. BETH
ALDEN PRESENT ON THE 2022 MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT PLAN AT THE
OCTOBER 20th REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING TO INCLUDE
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND AS THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION TO THE
AGENDA ITEM FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ON OCTOBER 20th PER
THE TPO'S REQUEST.
FURTHER, THAT THE ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CEREMONIAL

ACTIVITIES AND/OR PRESENTATION TO BE DISCUSSED UNDER STAFF
REPORTS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
7:09:53PM >>LUIS VIERA:
WE HAVE A MOTION BY CHAIRMAN CITRO, SECOND BY
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
7:10:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE ADJOURNED.
[MEETING ADJOURNED]



DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.