TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2023
5:01 P.M.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.
05:04:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THE MEETING IS IN SESSION.
05:04:14PM ROLL CALL.
05:04:15PM >>BILL CARLSON: HERE.
05:04:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE.
05:04:20PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE.
05:04:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, PRESENT.
05:04:33PM >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:04:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN VIERA WILL BE JOINING US VIA ZOOM
05:04:42PM AND HE WILL BE ON IN ABOUT TEN MINUTES.
05:04:43PM CAN I HAVE --
05:04:51PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO OPEN ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS.
05:04:54PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
05:04:54PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ONE THROUGH NINE.
05:04:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:05:01PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:05:04PM ALL IN FAVOR.
05:05:05PM THESE ARE NONQUASI-JUDICIAL AND DON'T HAVE TO SWEAR ANYBODY
05:05:10PM IN EXCEPT FOR THE LAST ONCE.
05:05:12PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-14.
05:05:17PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:05:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
05:05:21PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE WE HAVE SOME REQUEST -- AT LEAST
05:05:24PM FOR NUMBER 6 RELATIVE TO A CONTINUANCE.
05:05:27PM IS THAT CORRECT?
05:05:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: LET'S CLEAR OUT THE AGENDA.
05:05:30PM POLICE BARNES.
05:05:33PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: ITEM NUMBER 6 IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE.
05:05:37PM FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20.
05:05:38PM REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO APRIL 13, 2023.
05:05:42PM THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:05:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: APPLICANT, ARE YOU HERE?
05:05:49PM >> JOHN LaROCCA CONSULTING GROUP.
05:05:51PM I AM THE AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT.
05:05:53PM WE ARE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO COINCIDE WITH A REZONING
05:05:57PM WE ARE PROCESSING AT THIS TIME THAT IS SCHEDULED AT THIS
05:06:00PM POINT FOR APRIL 13.
05:06:02PM AS YOU KNOW, PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS ARE CURRENTLY RUNNING
05:06:06PM CONCURRENT AND ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE TO BE CONTINUED AT THE
05:06:11PM SAME HEARING DATE.
05:06:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS THIS YOUR FIRST CONTINUANCE?
05:06:18PM >> YES.
05:06:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK OF
05:06:22PM THIS CONTINUANCE ONLY?
05:06:23PM THE CONTINUANCE ONLY?
05:06:25PM SEEING NONE.
05:06:26PM WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:06:29PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:06:30PM ALL IN FAVOR.
05:06:31PM ANY OPPOSED?
05:06:33PM THE MOTION PASSES.
05:06:38PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING
05:06:40PM COMMISSION.
05:06:40PM ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-23.
05:06:43PM WE HAD ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED A CONTINUANCE TO FEBRUARY 23;
05:06:47PM HOWEVER, THAT DATE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO MARCH 23, 2023.
05:06:51PM THIS HAS TO BE HEARD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
05:06:55PM BEFORE IT COMES TO COUNCIL AND SOME MISNOTICES AND
05:06:59PM RESCHEDULING.
05:06:59PM THAT IS WHY THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REQUESTED A NEW DATE
05:07:02PM OF MARCH 323, 2023.
05:07:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS THE PETITIONER HERE?
05:07:12PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
05:07:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ASK IF ANYONE IS HERE FOR A CONTINUANCE
05:07:19PM ONLY.
05:07:20PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: 5:01 TIME.
05:07:23PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: CANNOT BE HEARD UNTIL HEARD BY THE ARC.
05:07:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
05:07:32PM OPPOSED.
05:07:33PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:07:34PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:07:35PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I BELIEVE THERE IS A REQUEST -- IF NOT I'M
05:07:39PM GOING TO MAKE ONE THAT NUMBER 9 BE HEARD FIRST BECAUSE IT
05:07:48PM IS -- IT IS JUST ONE -- I MEAN THE OTHERS ARE ALL
05:07:51PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS.
05:07:53PM SO THAT STAFF CAN LEAVE.
05:07:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: OKAY.
05:07:56PM SO THIS IS A REQUEST BY STAFF?
05:08:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES, I GUESS.
05:08:01PM WELL, A REQUEST BY ME SO THAT STAFF CAN GO HOME.
05:08:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU HAVE A MOTION MADE BY --
05:08:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
05:08:17PM >> MAY I SPEAK TO THAT?
05:08:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. PRESSMAN HAS GOT SOME -- HAVE ASKED THAT
05:08:24PM HIS CASE BE HEARD AND YOURS IS NUMBER ONE.
05:08:26PM >> YES, SIR.
05:08:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: HE HAS OTHER PRESSING ISSUES THAT HE NEEDS
05:08:30PM TO BE HERE AS SOON AS HE POSSIBLY CAN.
05:08:33PM DO YOU MIND IF I HEAR YOUR REQUEST SECOND?
05:08:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK: SURE.
05:08:37PM >> THANK YOU.
05:08:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:08:40PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:08:42PM ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
05:08:43PM ANY OPPOSED?
05:08:44PM MOTION PASSES.
05:08:46PM WE WILL GO TO ITEM 1.
05:08:57PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE WE BEGIN, A QUICK
05:09:15PM QUESTION -- EXCUSE ME, QUICK COMMENT.
05:09:18PM MAKE THE MOTION TO WAIVE THE RULES TO ALLOW FOR CMT FOR
05:09:23PM TONIGHT'S HEARINGS.
05:09:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:09:27PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:09:29PM ALL IN FAVOR.
05:09:30PM OPPOSED.
05:09:31PM >>SAM THOMAS: SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
05:09:36PM STAFF, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-14.
05:09:40PM SOME BACKGROUND ON THE REQUEST.
05:09:41PM PRIVATELY INITIATED .39 ACRES AND THE REQUEST TO GO FROM
05:09:47PM COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
05:09:50PM HERE IS THE SITE LOCATED ON OUR GENERAL MAP THE LOWRY PARK
05:10:00PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
05:10:01PM THE TRANSPORTATION STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THIS AS THE
05:10:04PM ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE MAP AS AN AREA OF HAVING MY NORTH
05:10:10PM POPULATION.
05:10:11PM THE AERIAL VIEW COUNTY SUBJECT SITE AT NEWPORT AVENUE AND
05:10:15PM WEST WATERS AVENUE.
05:10:17PM ALONG WEST WATERS AVENUE, THE MAINLAND USE IS LIGHT
05:10:21PM COMMERCIAL USES.
05:10:22PM WHEN YOU GO NORTH OF WEST WATERS AVENUE OR THE NORTH SIDE OF
05:10:26PM WEST WATERS AVENUE A MIX OF HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND WITH THAT
05:10:29PM LIGHT COMMERCIAL.
05:10:29PM AS YOU MOVE NORTH AND SOUTH OVER ON WEST WATERS AVENUE, IT
05:10:33PM QUICKLY TRANSITIONS TO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES.
05:10:36PM HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE LOOKING WEST ALONG WEST WATERS
05:10:43PM AVENUE AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF YOUR
05:10:45PM FRAME.
05:10:46PM THIS IS LOOKING EAST ALONG WEST WATERS AVENUE AND THE
05:10:49PM SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR FRAME.
05:10:51PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH FROM WEST WATERS AVENUE AND NORTH
05:10:57PM NEWPORT AVENUE.
05:10:58PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON YOUR LEFT.
05:11:00PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE SUBJECT SITE FROM NORTH
05:11:07PM NEWPORT AVENUE.
05:11:07PM AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE VACANT LOT AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY
05:11:13PM HOME IS NOT INCLUDED.
05:11:14PM HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP ALONG WEST WATERS
05:11:19PM AVENUE THAT THE DOMINANT MIXED AUTO US IS COMMUNITY USE 35
05:11:22PM AND NORTH OF WATERS AVENUE, IT DESIGNATES THE RESIDENTIAL-10
05:11:27PM WITH RESIDENTIAL DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
05:11:31PM HERE IS THE PROPOSED LAND USE MAP.
05:11:33PM YOU CAN SEE THE SITE IN RED RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
05:11:38PM COMMERCIAL 35 IF THIS AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED.
05:11:42PM SO THE IMPACTS OF THIS REQUEST.
05:11:43PM AS YOU CAN SEE THE UNITS AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE POTENTIAL IS
05:11:47PM THE SAME.
05:11:47PM THE ONLY CHANGE THAT THIS REQUEST WOULD HAVE IS INTRODUCE A
05:11:51PM CONSIDERATION OF COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES ON SUBJECT SITE.
05:11:54PM CITY STAFF DID HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THIS, AND I BELIEVE
05:12:01PM THAT?
05:12:07PM STEPHEN BENSON IS HERE TO TALK ON THAT.
05:12:09PM AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS CONSISTENT WITH TWO
05:12:11PM POLICIES.
05:12:12PM THEY ED THAT EACH MIXED USE WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH ADJACENT
05:12:16PM NEIGHBORHOOD AND CHARACTERS AND OR SCALE WITH THE GENERAL
05:12:19PM LOOK OF THE COMMUNITY AND CONTEXT WITH ITS CULTURE AND
05:12:22PM HISTORY.
05:12:22PM AND BASED ON THOSE TWO POLICIES, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
05:12:25PM RECOMMEND THAT THE IT BE FOUNT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS,
05:12:29PM POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
05:12:32PM THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY
05:12:35PM QUESTIONS.
05:12:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:12:39PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:12:40PM >>LYNN HURTAK: CAN YOU PUT THAT LAST ONE UP?
05:12:43PM >> YES.
05:12:46PM >>LYNN HURTAK: HOW DOES -- HOW DO YOU SEE THIS FITTING IN
05:12:49PM WITH THAT?
05:12:51PM >>SAM THOMAS: THIS WAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S FINDINGS,
05:12:53PM SO I CAN'T REALLY SPEAK TO WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S --
05:12:58PM THESE ARE THE POLICIES WHEN THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
05:13:00PM I REREAD THE TRANSCRIPT, THEY DIDN'T REALLY ELABORATE
05:13:05PM FURTHER ON THIS.
05:13:06PM BUT THAT IS WHAT THE POLICIES CITED WHEN THEY VOTED FOR
05:13:11PM THIS.
05:13:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
05:13:14PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:13:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: GO BACK TO YOUR MAP.
05:13:17PM >>SAM THOMAS: WOULD YOU LIKE THE PROPOSED.
05:13:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE PINK VERSUS THE GOLD.
05:13:23PM >>SAM THOMAS: YES, SIR.
05:13:24PM I HAVE GOT THE PROPOSED.
05:13:26PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, RIGHT THERE.
05:13:28PM PROPOSED.
05:13:35PM ALL RIGHT.
05:13:43PM THANK YOU.
05:13:44PM >>SAM THOMAS: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
05:13:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:13:50PM >>SAM THOMAS: THANK YOU.
05:13:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PETITIONER.
05:14:07PM MR. BENSON?
05:14:13PM CITY STAFF?
05:14:16PM THAT'S USUALLY WHERE --
05:14:20PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, PLANNING.
05:14:24PM STAFF OBJECTED TO THIS ITEM FOR A SPECIFIC REASON.
05:14:26PM THE DIFFERENCE IN CMU VERSUS CC IS VERY LIMITED.
05:14:30PM THE CC AND THE CMU DISTINCTION CORRELATES TO THE CG,
05:14:38PM COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE IN THE CODE.
05:14:43PM THEY ARE SIMILAR BUT COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ALLOW FOR MORE
05:14:47PM INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES.
05:14:49PM IN THE MAP PRESENTED, THE PATTERN -- EVERYTHING IS CMU.
05:14:52PM IF YOU LOOK AT THE ZONING LEVEL, EVERYTHING IS CG.
05:14:55PM IT DOESN'T HAVE THE CI, THE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ON SOUTH
05:14:59PM SIDE OF WATERS.
05:15:00PM OBJECTED THE FACT THAT IT WILL INTRODUCE HEAVY COMMERCIAL
05:15:06PM USES.
05:15:06PM THOSE USES INCLUDE INTENSE COMMERCIAL, COMMERCIAL AND
05:15:11PM SERVICE USES INCLUDING TRADE SCHOOLS, AIR CONDITIONING
05:15:14PM STORAGE, AUTOMOBILE RENTAL, PRINTING AND PUBLISHING, RETAIL
05:15:18PM SALES, TRUCK AND TRAILER RENTAL, WAREHOUSE AND WHOLESALE
05:15:22PM TRADE, VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING AND VEHICLE REPAIR MAJOR.
05:15:26PM I THINK THAT MAJOR VERSUS MINOR DISTINCTION IS WHAT IS
05:15:32PM SOMETHING THAT IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE CG AND THE CI AND
05:15:36PM ALSO RELATES TO THE AND WILL USE, THE CMU VERSUS THE CC
05:15:41PM WHICH IS THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TO TODAY.
05:15:42PM PERMITTED ACTIVITIES WITH THE PERMITS, ADULT USES, TEMPORARY
05:15:45PM HEALTH AGENCIES, UTILITY TRANSMISSION SITES, AND BLOOD DONOR CENTER.
05:15:53PM THOSE ARE PERMITTED UNDER THE CI AND THIS CAN COME TO YOU IF
05:16:00PM IT IS REZONED TO CI AFTER THIS AMENDMENT, AND IT APPEARS THAT
05:16:03PM WILL HAPPEN A BECAUSE THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO
05:16:07PM CATEGORIES.
05:16:07PM ACCESSORY INCLUDE OPEN STORAGE AND CREMATORIUM.
05:16:11PM THAT COULD BE A REQUEST AS WELL, BOTH OF THOSE USES.
05:16:15PM THAT IS THE OBJECTION THAT THERE IS NO CI AND CAN OPEN UP
05:16:19PM ALL THOSE USES ON SOUTH SIDE OF WATERS.
05:16:21PM THANK YOU.
05:16:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:16:25PM PETITIONER?
05:16:31PM >> GOOD MORNING OR GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND BOARD
05:16:34PM MEMBERS, TODD PRESSMAN, 200 SECOND AVENUE IN ST. PETERSBURG.
05:16:39PM IF WE CAN GO TO THE POWERPOINT PLEASE.
05:16:41PM WE ARE PLEASED TO COME FORWARD WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
05:16:44PM RECOMMENDATION OF 7-0.
05:16:45PM THEY UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED THIS REQUEST AS DOES THE PLANNING
05:16:49PM COMMISSION STAFF.
05:16:50PM THE ISSUE IS SEEKING COMMUNITY MIXED USE TO COMMUNITY
05:16:55PM COMMERCIAL 35.
05:16:55PM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF TELLS YOU THE PROPOSED WILL NOT
05:16:59PM RESULT IN A CHANGE IN NET DENSITY OR INTENSITY AND THE
05:17:03PM SURROUNDING AREA IS ALREADY CHARACTERIZED BY A MIX OF
05:17:07PM INTENSIVE USES, PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL
05:17:11PM USES ALREADY LOCATE ALONG WEST WATERS AVENUE.
05:17:15PM THEY TELL YOU THAT THE SURROUNDING AREA IS CHARACTERIZED
05:17:18PM WITH LIGHT COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY.
05:17:19PM SO WE ARE LOCATED ON WATERS AVENUE, AS YOU SEE WEST OF THE
05:17:23PM INTERSTATE AND FLORIDA.
05:17:23PM THIS IS THE CLOSE-UP OF THE SITE.
05:17:28PM AND I NOTED THE SITE IN YELLOW ON ONE SIDE.
05:17:32PM YOU CAN SEE WHEN YOU PULL BACK A LITTLE BIT FURTHER, THERE
05:17:36PM IS PLENTY OF CC-35 IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
05:17:40PM ANOTHER AERIAL SITE ON THAT SERVICE THAT I WILL EXPAND UPON
05:17:44PM AN INTENSIVE TRUCKING USE THAT IS THERE NOW.
05:17:47PM THIS IS A STREET VIEW OF THAT SITE ABUTTING DIRECTLY RIGHT
05:17:52PM NEXT TO US.
05:17:53PM THIS IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET A MAJOR AUTO REPAIR,
05:18:01PM TRANSMISSIONS.
05:18:01PM THAT IS A CI USE.
05:18:03PM WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE EXISTING LAND USES -- THIS IS NOT A
05:18:06PM ZONING OR FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
05:18:08PM THESE ARE ACTUAL LAND USES YOU BEGIN TO SEE A WIDE VARIETY
05:18:13PM OF VERY INTENSIVE USES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
05:18:16PM THE SITE IS LOCATED DASHED LINE THE WORD "SITE" IN THE
05:18:21PM SQUARE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WATERS.
05:18:22PM YOU CAN SEE THE REDS.
05:18:24PM YOU CAN SEE THE BLUES.
05:18:25PM ALL INTENSIVE AND CI USES IN THE AREA ALREADY.
05:18:28PM THIS I AM HIGHLIGHTING FOR YOU.
05:18:30PM AUTO REPAIR, WHICH IS A HEAVY COMMERCIAL, CI USE.
05:18:36PM AUTOMATIC ICE MACHINES.
05:18:38PM ONE OF THE BIG ICE MACHINES THAT YOU PULL UP TO.
05:18:42PM AUTO REPAIR AND JUNK DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.
05:18:45PM CI USE, HEAVY COMMERCIAL USE.
05:18:47PM HEAVY TO THE RIGHT IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES, BOAT AND CAR
05:18:53PM STORAGE AND SHOPPING CENTER.
05:18:54PM AND TO SHOW YOU THOSE PHOTO BY PHOTO, THESE ARE SOME OF
05:18:59PM THE USES I POINTED OUT IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE
05:19:02PM AREA.
05:19:02PM SOME OF THE USES THAT STAFF WAS TALKING ABOUT.
05:19:05PM WE ARE ALSO REQUIRED A BUFFER UNDER ZONING CODE OF
05:19:11PM 15-FOOT BUFFER WITH A REAR WITH MASONRY WALL, GROUNDS AND
05:19:16PM SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER.
05:19:18PM AS YOU SAW IN THE CODE, THE SITE IS NO DEEPER THAN ALL THE
05:19:22PM REST OF THE COMMERCIAL AND HEAVY INTENSIVE ZONING FROM
05:19:25PM WATERS AVENUE.
05:19:26PM THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BECAUSE YOUR ZONING STAFF
05:19:30PM TALKED ABOUT SOME INTENSIVE USES.
05:19:32PM AND WITH GREAT RESPECT, THEY THREW IN SPECIAL USES, WHICH
05:19:37PM YOU KNOW COME TO YOU SEPARATELY.
05:19:39PM I THINK -- I THINK THAT IS UNFAIR TO STATE THOSE BECAUSE
05:19:41PM THEY DON'T COME FORWARD UNLESS YOU APPROVE THEM.
05:19:44PM BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT CI USES THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED ON THE
05:19:48PM SITE BECAUSE IT IS VERY SMALL, IT EXCLUDES BY CODE A LOT
05:19:53PM OF CI USES.
05:19:54PM SO DRY CLEANING PLANT LARGE CAN'T GO THERE.
05:19:58PM IT IS TOO BIG.
05:19:59PM A SMALL ONE IS PERMITTED IN CG.
05:20:01PM NO DIFFERENT.
05:20:02PM ZONED CG NOW.
05:20:04PM HELIPORT.
05:20:05PM THAT WILL NOT GO THERE.
05:20:07PM A KENNEL LARGE IS PERMITTED BUT THIS SITE IS TOO SMALL TO
05:20:12PM CARRY IT.
05:20:13PM A SMALL KENNEL ALREADY IN CG WHERE THE SITE IS ZONED
05:20:17PM ALREADY.
05:20:17PM NO DIFFERENCE THERE.
05:20:18PM MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY.
05:20:21PM QUIET USES.
05:20:22PM STORAGE.
05:20:22PM SMALL STRIPS.
05:20:23PM LOW VEHICLES.
05:20:24PM NO NOISE.
05:20:25PM LIGHT MANUFACTURING.
05:20:27PM I AM SORRY.
05:20:27PM PRINTING.
05:20:31PM IN TERMS OF CREMATORIUM, THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NOT PERMITTED AT
05:20:36PM THE SITE.
05:20:37PM A FIVE-FOOT BUFFER TO RESIDENTIAL.
05:20:43PM THIS SITE RESIDENTIAL IS NOT PERMITTED USE.
05:20:45PM VEHICLE REPAIR IS PERMITTED.
05:20:48PM MINOR IS PERMITTED ALREADY BUT YOU SAW ACTIVE THROUGHOUT THE
05:20:52PM IMMEDIATE AREA.
05:20:53PM WHOLE SALE AND WAREHOUSE.
05:20:55PM WITH REGARD TO THE REQUEST, THE CI USES ARE HAMPERED BY THE
05:21:00PM SIZE OF THE SITE AND ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE CG WHICH THEY ARE
05:21:03PM NOW BUT WILL ALLOW A FEW MORE ADDITIONAL USE THE APPLICANT
05:21:08PM WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE.
05:21:09PM WE ARE LOCATED ON WEST WATERS STREET THAT HAS 28,000 OR
05:21:14PM 30,000 VEHICLES PER DAY.
05:21:15PM A VERY INTENSIVE ARTERIAL AND VERY BUSY AND THIS IS LOCATED
05:21:20PM DIRECTLY ON THAT ROADWAY.
05:21:21PM IN SUMMARY, WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE
05:21:24PM AREA.
05:21:24PM THAT IS WHY THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IT
05:21:27PM CONSISTENT AND WHY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT
05:21:29PM CONSISTENT BY 7-0 VOTE.
05:21:31PM AND I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY OPPOSITION IN REGARD TO THE
05:21:36PM REQUEST.
05:21:36PM I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
05:21:41PM THANK YOU.
05:21:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
05:21:43PM SEEING NONE.
05:21:46PM STAFF, ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE ANY STATEMENTS?
05:21:50PM >>SAM THOMAS: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE TWO CORRECTIONS FOR THE
05:21:53PM RECORD.
05:21:53PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID NOT FIND THIS UNANIMOUS.
05:21:56PM THE DECISION WAS FIVE YES, THREE NO, AND TWO ABSENT AND
05:22:01PM PLANNING COMMISSION DID NOT FIND THIS CONSISTENT.
05:22:02PM PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS CONSISTENT.
05:22:04PM OR RECOMMENDED CONSISTENCY FINDING.
05:22:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
05:22:10PM ANYONE -- I SEE MR. BENSON GETTING UP.
05:22:15PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: COUNCIL, JUST TO BE CLEAR, I BELIEVE THIS
05:22:20PM REPORT IS BASED UPON WHAT IS ADOPTED.
05:22:22PM IT DOESN'T REFLECT ANY USES THAT MIGHT EXIST THAT ARE NOT
05:22:25PM CONFORMING TO THE ZONING OR NOT CONFORMING TO THE FUTURE
05:22:29PM LAND USE.
05:22:29PM YOU HAVE A PLAN TO IDENTIFY WHAT YOU WANT THE AREA TO BE IN
05:22:32PM THE FUTURE BUT MAY NOT ALIGN WHAT IS THERE TODAY.
05:22:35PM THAT MAY BE THE DISTINCTION PRESENTED.
05:22:37PM EXISTING LAND USE.
05:22:40PM EXISTING USES MAY NOT NECESSARILY ALIGN WITH WHAT THE ZONING
05:22:44PM OR WHAT THE COMP PLAN HAS SET FORTH IN THIS AREA.
05:22:47PM THAT IS -- YOUR DISCRETION WHETHER OR NOT THAT WILL CHANGE.
05:22:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. GUDES, I SEE YOUR HAND IS UP.
05:22:55PM YOU CAN RECOGNIZED.
05:22:56PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM GLAD YOU SAID THAT, I LOOK AT THOSE
05:23:00PM PHOTOS AND I AM FAMILIAR WITH WEST WATERS AVENUE AND ALL CON
05:23:04PM BOB SLATED.
05:23:05PM YOU SAY ONE THING BUT WE ARE LOOKING AT ANOTHER HERE.
05:23:08PM THANK YOU.
05:23:08PM >> I WANT TO CORRECT FOR THE RECORD, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
05:23:14PM WAS 5-3.
05:23:15PM THAT WAS MY ERROR.
05:23:17PM THANK YOU.
05:23:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
05:23:18PM ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1,
05:23:24PM FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-14.
05:23:26PM >> HELLO, ALVARO BALDWIN, AND I AM PRIVATE CITIZEN NEAR
05:23:34PM THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
05:23:35PM I WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT SUPPORTING THE NONCONSISTENCY.
05:23:41PM THE MAINTAINING AND PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF EXISTING
05:23:45PM AREAS.
05:23:46PM THIS LOT ABUTS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND A CLEAR FUTURE
05:23:50PM VISION FOR THE WATERS AVENUE CORRIDOR WITH A CONSISTENT
05:23:52PM BLOCK OF CMU-5 RUNNING EAST TO WEST.
05:23:55PM THE CMU ALONG THIS CORRIDOR HAVE A FUTURE SCENARIO WHERE
05:24:01PM WATERS AVENUE WITH FOLLOW A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
05:24:05PM AND FURTHER CONNECT THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS NORTH AND SOUTH OF
05:24:08PM THIS LOT TO IMPORTANT KEY PLANNING AREAS SUCH AS THE DOG
05:24:13PM TRACK, SULPHUR SPRINGS, WATER TOWER PARK AND POTENTIAL
05:24:19PM HIGHER QUALITY TRANSIT SERVICE NORTH AND SOUTH ALONG FLORIDA
05:24:23PM AVE AND 275.
05:24:24PM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE AREA WILL
05:24:27PM BENEFIT FROM THE CONSISTENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
05:24:30PM AS A RESIDENTIAL OF THE AREA, I CAN SHARE MY PERSONAL
05:24:33PM EXPERIENCE AND MANY PEOPLE WALK AND BIKE ALONG THIS VERY,
05:24:36PM VERY BUSY CORRIDOR.
05:24:37PM A LOT OF THE ARGUMENTS BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN THIS AREA AS MR.
05:24:42PM GUDES POINTED OUT KIND OF IN TRANSITION.
05:24:45PM THERE IS A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL.
05:24:47PM THERE ARE LOCAL BUSINESSES.
05:24:48PM RESTAURANTS.
05:24:49PM A MONTESSORI SCHOOL.
05:24:50PM THERE ARE FAMILIES WALKING ON THIS ROAD.
05:24:53PM SO THIS -- THIS DECISION THAT YOU MAKE KIND OF SETS THE
05:24:57PM MOMENTUM FOR WHETHER THIS CORRIDOR BECOMES BETTER FOR THE
05:25:01PM PEOPLE WHO LIVE AROUND IT OR CONTINUES TO FOLLOW THIS
05:25:04PM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE PATTERN.
05:25:06PM SO AS A RESIDENT, I WANTED TO POINT THIS OUT AND HIGHLIGHT
05:25:10PM THAT THIS IS KIND OF LIKE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO
05:25:14PM CLARIFY WHAT WATERS IS.
05:25:16PM AND JUST BECAUSE IT EXISTINGLY IS -- HAS POCKMARKS OF HEAVY
05:25:23PM INDUSTRIAL DOES NOT MEAN YOU SHOULD SADDLE THE RESIDENTS OF
05:25:26PM THE AREA OF CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE
05:25:31PM USES.
05:25:31PM THANK YOU.
05:25:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
05:25:33PM IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO
05:25:38PM THIS?
05:25:39PM DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
05:25:41PM >>CLERK: NO.
05:25:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: SEEING NONE.
05:25:44PM REBUTTAL?
05:25:46PM >> YES, SIR.
05:25:46PM WE SENT OUT ABOUT 36 SEPARATE CERTIFIED REGISTERED NOTICE
05:25:53PM LETTERS TO THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD.
05:25:54PM WE HAD TWO HUGE YELLOW SIGNS RIGHT ON WATERS AVENUE.
05:25:58PM AND RESPECT THE GENTLEMAN COMING ON DOWN, BUT WE HAVE DONE
05:26:04PM PRETTY INCENTIVE NOTICE OF NEIGHBORS.
05:26:07PM AND JUST HAD THE ONE GENTLEMAN COME DOWN IS QUITE FRANKLY --
05:26:12PM NOT HIS COMMENTS, BUT SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU.
05:26:15PM THANK YOU.
05:26:15PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MO OF TO CLOSE.
05:26:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
05:26:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. SHELBY.
05:26:21PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER WITH REGARD TO THIS HEARING
05:26:24PM AND ANY OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS.
05:26:28PM THOSE ARE LEGISLATIVE MATTERS.
05:26:31PM THEY ARE NOT QUASI-JUDICIAL.
05:26:33PM AND JUST SO YOU KNOW, IT MEANS IT DOES NOT REQUIRE
05:26:38PM COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND DEFERENCE IS AGAIN TO
05:26:41PM THE BOARD'S DECISION AND WILL WILL BE UPHELD IF REASONABLE
05:26:46PM PEOPLE CAN DIFFER AS OF PROPRIETY.
05:26:50PM IT IS A LESSER STANDARD THAN A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER.
05:26:55PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:26:58PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
05:27:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
05:27:02PM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:27:09PM >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-14
05:27:12PM ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED ON FIRST READING CONSIDERING,
05:27:15PM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
05:27:19PM FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
05:27:23PM PROPERTY AT 1112 WEST WATERS AVENUE FROM COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35
05:27:27PM TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL-35, CC-35, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
05:27:32PM THE ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
05:27:36PM PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:27:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:27:40PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:27:41PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
05:27:43PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:27:44PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM ACTUALLY REALLY SURPRISED BECAUSE I
05:27:47PM THOUGHT THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT AS STAFF MENTIONED IS
05:27:52PM CLEARLY NOT IN HARMONY WITH WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR THIS
05:27:56PM CORRIDOR TO BECOME JUST BECAUSE IT IS SOMETHING NOW DOESN'T
05:28:01PM MEAN IT ALWAYS IS GOING TO BE THIS WAY.
05:28:03PM IF WE DON'T WANT HEAVY COMMERCIAL ALONG THIS CORRIDOR IN THE
05:28:06PM FUTURE, THIS IS THE WAY THAT THE CITY PLANS FOR THAT.
05:28:11PM WE HEARD FROM A RESIDENT WHO DESPERATELY DOES NOT WANT THIS
05:28:16PM TO CONTINUE TO BE A HEAVY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR.
05:28:18PM I THINK IN DOING THIS, WE DO CHANGE THE ENTIRE LOOK OF THAT
05:28:24PM STREET.
05:28:24PM THERE IS ALREADY SOME HEAVY COMMERCIAL DOWN THE STREET, BUT
05:28:28PM WE DON'T HAVE TO CONTINUE IT DOWN THE STREET.
05:28:30PM SO I WILL RESPECTIVE RESPECTEDLY VOTING AGAINST THIS.
05:28:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER COMMENTS.
05:28:38PM A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:28:40PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:28:42PM IS COUNCILMAN VIERA WITH US YET?
05:28:51PM >>CLERK: NOT YET, SIR.
05:28:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:28:54PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:28:56PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
05:28:57PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
05:29:01PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
05:29:04PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
05:29:05PM >>LYNN HURTAK: NO.
05:29:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
05:29:10PM >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK VOTING NO.
05:29:14PM >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:29:18PM THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS.
05:29:19PM >>CLERK: AND VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE.
05:29:23PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FEBRUARY 16, 2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
05:29:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOW WE ARE GOING TO GO TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
05:29:36PM 9.
05:29:37PM FILE NO. AB2-22-21.
05:29:42PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: THANK YOU, SIR.
05:29:45PM ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
05:29:47PM CASE NINE IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE 2 FOR SMALL VENUE,
05:29:54PM BEER, WINE, LIQUOR, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISE AND PACKAGE
05:29:59PM ALLEGATION OFF-PREMISE.
05:30:01PM 1730 EAST 7th AVENUE.
05:30:04PM I WILL GO AHEAD AND FIRST SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE
05:30:07PM PROPERTY.
05:30:07PM AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
05:30:19PM YOU SEE TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE EAST 8th AVENUE.
05:30:23PM TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE EAST 6th AVENUE.
05:30:26PM TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE NORTH 17th STREET.
05:30:30PM AND TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE NORTH 19th STREET.
05:30:32PM THE PROPERTY IS FACING EAST 7th AVENUE.
05:30:36PM ALONG EAST 7th AVENUE, YOU WILL HAVE A MULTITUDE OF
05:30:39PM COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, RESTAURANTS, BARS, CLUBS, AND
05:30:44PM ENTERTAINMENT TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENTS.
05:30:46PM THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE CC-1 ZONING DISTRICT.
05:30:55PM THE PROPERTY ITSELF HAS SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 1951 SQUARE FEET
05:31:00PM ON FIRST FLOOR WHERE THE AB SALES WILL BE LOCATED.
05:31:04PM I WILL SHARE THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE SITE PLAN.
05:31:09PM AND THE ESTABLISHMENT RIGHT HERE.
05:31:18PM TO THE WEST OF IT, YOU HAVE A CIGAR LOUNGE.
05:31:26PM AND THEN AS I SAID UP AND DOWN THE STREET, YOU HAVE MANY
05:31:30PM ENTERTAINMENT AND RESTAURANTS ESTABLISHMENTS.
05:31:35PM NOT REQUIRED IN THE CC-1 ZONING.
05:31:44PM PROPOSED USE IS FOR A BAR WITH RETAIL SALES.
05:31:49PM SITE PLAN IS SHOWING THE OPERATION AND BUSINESS WILL BE
05:31:52PM CONSISTENT WITH THE CHAPTER 14 ZONING STANDARDS.
05:31:55PM THERE IS ONE WAIVER, SECTION 27-132 WHICH IS TO REDUCE THE
05:32:03PM REQUIRED --
05:32:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: OH, YES -- I -- I APOLOGIZE.
05:32:11PM WE ONLY HAD ONE QUASI JUDICIAL.
05:32:14PM SO -- IF ANYBODY IS GOING TO BE GIVING ANY TYPE OF TESTIMONY
05:32:18PM OR MAKING ANY TYPE OF STATEMENTS IN THIS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
05:32:23PM 9, FILE NO. AB2-22-21, PLEASE RISE TO BE SWORN IN AT THIS
05:32:29PM TIME.
05:32:30PM ANYONE GIVING ANY TYPE OF TESTIMONY OR GIVING ANY STATEMENT.
05:32:34PM [SWEARING IN]
05:32:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. HUSSEIN.
05:32:46PM FORGIVE MY INTERRUPTION.
05:32:53PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: SHOULD I RESTART?
05:32:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.
05:32:57PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: YOU SEE THE AB SALES.
05:32:59PM ONE WAIVER SUNSHINE SECTION 27-132 TO REDUCE FROM 250 FEET
05:33:04PM TO ZERO FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS WHICH IS
05:33:08PM THAT LONG ASH CIGARS LOUNGE TO THE WEST.
05:33:12PM I WILL SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
05:33:19PM THE ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
05:33:23PM YOU SEE THE BACK SIDE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT.
05:33:25PM TO THE EAST IS A PARKING LOT.
05:33:30PM THAT IS THE ESTABLISHMENT RIGHT THERE.
05:33:32PM AND TO THE SOUTH, AS YOU SEE, THE ESTABLISHMENT RIGHT HERE.
05:33:37PM AS I WENT OUT AND TOOK PICTURES MYSELF, I'LL FIRST SHOW THE
05:33:47PM -- AS I AM IN THE PARKING LOT ON THE NORTH SIDE, YOU WILL
05:33:50PM SEE YOU HAVE A IRISH PUB RIGHT HERE TO THE NORTH ON 8th
05:33:54PM STREET.
05:33:55PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: 8th AVENUE, ZAIN?
05:34:06PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: 8th AVENUE, CORRECT.
05:34:09PM ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT.
05:34:12PM AS YOU WILL SEE TO THE EAST, CARMINE'S, CHILL BROS ICE CREAM
05:34:19PM AND OTHER RESTAURANT AND BAR LOUNGES.
05:34:22PM TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE OTHER BAR ESTABLISHMENTS.
05:34:34PM OFF KARAOKE PLACE HERE.
05:34:36PM YOU HAVE THE CIGAR STUDIO RIGHT HERE.
05:34:39PM AND ALSO YOU HAVE COYOTE UGLY BAR ALONG THERE TO THE WEST.
05:34:44PM TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE A CAFE.
05:34:57PM AND ANOTHER COUPLE OF BARS RIGHT HERE.
05:34:59PM DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY, YOU WILL HAVE THIS LONG
05:35:10PM ASH CIGAR LOUNGE.
05:35:13PM THIS IS THE BACK OF THE SITE.
05:35:22PM AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT AS IS.
05:35:32PM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
05:35:44PM APPLICATION AND FINDS THE APPLICATION TO BE INCONSISTENT
05:35:46PM WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
05:35:48PM THAT IS DUE TO THAT ONE WAIVER ASKING FOR SEPARATION.
05:35:51PM IF APPROVED BY COUNCIL, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS
05:35:57PM TO THE REVISION SHEET WHICH IS WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT
05:36:00PM WITHIN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
05:36:02PM I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
05:36:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUMANE.
05:36:07PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT A QUESTION.
05:36:08PM BUT IF YOU MAY, INCONSISTENT BECAUSE CLOSER TO THE OTHER
05:36:12PM ALCOHOL BEVERAGE.
05:36:14PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: CORRECT.
05:36:15PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HOW WERE THE REST ZONED THAT WAY.
05:36:19PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: IF A WAIVER FOR AB SALES, IT WILL BE THAT
05:36:24PM WAY.
05:36:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
05:36:26PM THANK YOU.
05:36:27PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:36:28PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM CURIOUS AND MAYBE STAFF CAN LOOK AT
05:36:31PM THAT.
05:36:32PM YBOR IS A STRIP FULL OF BARS AND GOING WITH 250.
05:36:35PM WHY ARE WE KEEPING THAT IN THE CODE WHEN WE KNOW THAT IS A
05:36:38PM BAR STRIP.
05:36:38PM IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME.
05:36:42PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: A VERY GOOD POINT.
05:36:44PM I UNDERSTAND THAT.
05:36:45PM IT HAS BEEN A PRECEDENT.
05:36:47PM IF IT HAS ONE WAIVER, IT IS AUTOMATICALLY GOING TO BE
05:36:51PM INCONSISTENT.
05:36:51PM I AM SURE I CAN TALK TO MY INTERNAL STAFF AND IF THAT NEEDS
05:36:56PM TO BE CHANGED LIKE A REZONING.
05:36:57PM WE CAN DISCUSS THAT.
05:37:02PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, ZAIN.
05:37:04PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN: OF COURSE.
05:37:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
05:37:06PM PETITIONER?
05:37:13PM >> GOOD EVENING, MICHAEL DeMAIO HERE ON BEHALF OF THE
05:37:18PM APPLICANT, WINE AND CHAMPAGNE.
05:37:20PM 1730 EAST 7th AVENUE 33605 LOCATED IN YBOR CITY.
05:37:25PM I HAVE BROUGHT THE CO-OWNER TRAVIS HORN AND A LOCAL BUSINESS
05:37:30PM OWNER GiO FUKARINO, IF COUNCIL HAS ANY QUESTIONS.
05:37:36PM AND IN THE STAFF REPORT, THOSE HAVE BEEN MADE AND SUBMITTED
05:37:42PM TO ACELA.
05:37:44PM I DON'T KNOW IF STAFF HAS REVIEWED IT YET.
05:37:46PM BUT THEY WILL BE DONE BY THE SECOND READING.
05:37:48PM JUST AS SOME BACKGROUND TO THE BUSINESS GIO'S FINE WINE AND
05:37:53PM CHAMPAGNE PROPOSE TODAY BRING AN OPPORTUNITY CURRENTLY
05:37:56PM UNAVAILABLE TO THE RESIDENTS AND TOURISTS OF YBOR CITY WHICH
05:37:59PM IS THE IMPORT AND ENJOYMENT OF EXCLUSIVE CHAMPAGNE FROM
05:38:04PM DIFFERENT REGIONS AROUND THE WORLD.
05:38:06PM AS TO THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT, THIS WILL NOT AFFECT
05:38:11PM OTHER AB2 ESTABLISHMENTS WILL PROVIDE A NEW SOURCE OF
05:38:15PM REVENUE.
05:38:15PM SO WE HOPE COUNCIL GRANTS IT.
05:38:17PM THANK YOU.
05:38:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
05:38:24PM EXCUSE ME, SIR.
05:38:25PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
05:38:29PM CAN YOU READ THE NAME OF THE ESTABLISHMENT.
05:38:32PM >> GIO'S FINE WINE AND CHAMPAGNE.
05:38:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: FINE WINE AND CHAMPAGNE.
05:38:37PM WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THE PACKAGE SALE.
05:38:39PM DO YOU HAVE YOUR OWN LABEL OF CHAMPAGNE YOU ARE GOING TO
05:38:43PM SELL?
05:38:44PM >> THAT IS WHY I HAVE THE CO-OWNER TO GIVE THAT SORT OF
05:38:48PM TESTIMONY IN CASE THE QUESTION CAME OUT.
05:38:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: WHOEVER WANTS TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD
05:38:53PM GREATLY APPRECIATE IT.
05:38:55PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN.
05:38:56PM A FAIR QUESTION.
05:38:58PM I TRAVELED TO FRANCE AS AN AMBASSADOR TO BROKER DEALS ON
05:39:02PM FINE CHAMPAGNE.
05:39:03PM AND I HAVE SECURED SOME DEALS --
05:39:08PM >> SORRY, APOLOGIES, TRAVIS HORN.
05:39:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN?
05:39:12PM >> SWORN IN.
05:39:13PM CO-OWNER AND FOUNDER OF GIO'S FINE WINE AND CHAMPAGNE.
05:39:18PM WE HAVE OPPORTUNITIES -- AGAIN AS MICHAEL MENTIONED TO
05:39:21PM PROVIDE SOME CHAMPAGNES THAT TOURISTS AND LOCALS CANNOT GET
05:39:26PM AT SOME OF THE BIG BOX STORES LIKE TOTAL WINE, ABC.
05:39:30PM AND WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THEM THAT.
05:39:33PM WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE SELLING GLASSES OF CHAMPAGNE OUT THE
05:39:36PM WINDOW OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT OR PACKAGING, YOU KNOW, CHEAP
05:39:41PM WINE.
05:39:41PM IT WILL BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD PACKAGE UP AND THEY WOULD
05:39:45PM TAKE HOME.
05:39:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I UNDERSTAND, BUT YOU MUST UNDERSTAND WHAT
05:39:49PM WE HAVE TO LOOK AT ALSO.
05:39:50PM I AM NOT WISHING ANY ILL-WILL ON ANYBODY'S BUSINESS, BUT FOR
05:39:56PM SOME REASON IF THIS BUSINESS IS SOLD AND SOLD TO THE NEXT
05:39:59PM PERSON, THEN THEY CAN COME IN AND SELL COORS LIGHT AND
05:40:05PM SMIRNOFF.
05:40:06PM NO LONGER A FINE CAMPAIGN.
05:40:08PM >> WE HAVE A 16-YEAR LEASE THAT WE ARE COMMITTED TO
05:40:11PM FULFILLING.
05:40:11PM WE HAVE BEEN PAYING ON THE LEASE SINCE LAST FEBRUARY AND WE
05:40:15PM HAVEN'T YET DRAW A DOLLAR OUT OF IT.
05:40:17PM AND WE CERTAINLY WOULD LIKE TO START SELLING FINE WINE.
05:40:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: AGAIN NOT QUESTIONING.
05:40:22PM BUT THINGS HAPPEN TO ANYBODY.
05:40:23PM ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN.
05:40:24PM AND, YOU KNOW, MY -- I LOVE YBOR AND I JUST WANT TO SEE IT
05:40:30PM GO UP.
05:40:30PM ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
05:40:34PM ANY COMMENTS?
05:40:36PM >> THANK YOU.
05:40:37PM APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
05:40:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS THERE ANYBODY IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO
05:40:45PM SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9, WHICH IS FILE NO. AB2-22-21.
05:40:50PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:40:53PM >> SECOND.
05:40:54PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANYBODY ONLINE?
05:40:57PM >>CLERK: NO, WE DO NOT.
05:40:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:41:00PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:41:01PM ALL IN FAVOR.
05:41:02PM THANK YOU.
05:41:05PM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:41:06PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN,
05:41:09PM ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING.
05:41:11PM AN ORDINANCE OF A SPECIAL USE FILE NO. AB2-22-21 FOR SPECIAL
05:41:16PM USE 2 FOR SMALL VENUE.
05:41:19PM AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGE REGARDLESS OF
05:41:23PM ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE OR LIQUOR AND OPINION FROM
05:41:25PM THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT OR PLAT OF LAND EAST 7th AVENUE
05:41:33PM PROVIDED THAT ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICTS ARE REPEALED
05:41:36PM PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:41:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
05:41:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:41:41PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:41:42PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
05:41:44PM USUALLY I AM VERY HESITANT -- VERY, VERY HESITANT AT PACKAGE
05:41:50PM SALES.
05:41:51PM BUT JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT TO DRINK 24-7.
05:41:55PM I JUST HAD THIS THING ABOUT WHERE THEY CAN BUY.
05:41:59PM I HOPE YOUR PLAN SUCCEEDS.
05:42:04PM LET'S HAVE ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:42:06PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
05:42:09PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
05:42:14PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
05:42:16PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
05:42:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
05:42:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
05:42:22PM >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT
05:42:27PM AT VOTE.
05:42:28PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 16,
05:42:33PM 2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
05:42:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
05:42:41PM FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-16.
05:42:41PM >> PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
05:43:04PM THIS IS FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-16 LOCATED AT 610 NORTH BAY
05:43:13PM STREET.
05:43:13PM JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND.
05:43:15PM THE AMENDMENT WAS PRIVATELY INITIATED, SCHOOL SCALE.
05:43:19PM AND THE SITE IS 0.71 ACRES.
05:43:22PM THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:43:26PM FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
05:43:31PM THE REQUEST WAS CHANGED TO R-20 DURING THE PLANNING
05:43:35PM COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 7, 2022.
05:43:37PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDED THE CHANGE
05:43:41PM TO R-20.
05:43:41PM THE APPLICANT AGREED TO REDUCE THE REQUEST TO R-20 AT THAT
05:43:45PM MEETING AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED ON THE REQUEST
05:43:49PM OF R-20.
05:43:50PM THIS IS THE GENERAL LOCATION MAP.
05:43:53PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE.
05:43:55PM IT IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
05:43:58PM THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND THE SOUTH SEMINOLE
05:44:03PM HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
05:44:03PM HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING
05:44:08PM AREA.
05:44:09PM YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
05:44:11PM SUBJECT SITE IS BOUND BY N. BOULEVARD AND WEST NORTH BAY
05:44:16PM STREET, WEST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD IS
05:44:21PM FURTHER TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.
05:44:22PM THE AREA AROUND THE SITE CONSISTENT OF COMMERCIAL USES ALONG
05:44:26PM MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND TO THE WEST, NORTH AND EAST OF
05:44:31PM THE SUBJECT SITE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES.
05:44:33PM THIS IS FACING WEST ALONG NORTH BAY STREET.
05:44:38PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS TO THE LEFT.
05:44:40PM THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE FACING SOUTH ALONG WEST
05:44:46PM NORTH BAY STREET.
05:44:47PM THIS IS FACING NORTH ALONG N. BOULEVARD.
05:44:53PM SUBJECT SITE IS BEHIND ON THE RIGHT.
05:44:55PM THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE FACING SOUTH AT THE
05:45:02PM CORNER OF WEST NORTH BAY STREET AND N. BOULEVARD.
05:45:05PM THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
05:45:11PM AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE REPRESENTED BY THE
05:45:15PM BLACK OUTLINE AND THE ORANGE COLOR, WHICH IS THE
05:45:18PM RESIDENTIAL-10.
05:45:18PM THE CMU-35 IS ALONG WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND YOU CAN
05:45:24PM SEE THE RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE WEST -- THE WEST, NORTH AND
05:45:29PM EAST AND FURTHER TO THE NORTH IS THE RESIDENTIAL-10.
05:45:31PM RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION.
05:45:34PM THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
05:45:38PM AGAIN THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE AND OUTLINED WITH THE
05:45:41PM RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION.
05:45:43PM THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS THAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU ARE FOR THE
05:45:49PM ORIGINAL REQUEST OF RESIDENTIAL-35.
05:45:51PM WE DO NOT FILE A NEW STAFF REPORT WITH THE REDUCTION OF THE
05:45:54PM REQUEST, BUT WITH THE POTENTIAL, THE RESIDENTIAL-20 WILL BE
05:46:01PM SLIGHTLY LESS THAN BOTH THE NUMBERS YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU.
05:46:04PM THE CITY OF TAMPA DID HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THE ORIGINAL
05:46:12PM REQUEST OF R-35.
05:46:14PM JUST A REMINDER, WE DO NOT FEEL A NEW STAFF REPORT OR SEND
05:46:18PM IT OUT FOR AGENCY REVIEW AGAIN.
05:46:20PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
05:46:26PM MULTIPLE ASPECTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
05:46:28PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAVE POLICY DIRECTION THAT SEEKS TO
05:46:31PM PROTECT EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WHILE BALANCING THE NEED
05:46:35PM FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD.
05:46:38PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
05:46:42PM CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY THAT
05:46:47PM ENCOURAGES HIGHER RESIDENTIAL WITHIN GOODS AND SERVICES OF
05:46:51PM TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES.
05:46:53PM AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO SEEKS TO DIRECT THE GREATEST
05:46:57PM SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE URBAN VILLAGES.
05:47:00PM WITH THAT IN MIND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT
05:47:04PM THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE
05:47:07PM GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
05:47:11PM PLAN.
05:47:11PM THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:47:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:47:23PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING.
05:47:25PM I WANTED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CONTEXT.
05:47:27PM WE DIDN'T REVIEW THIS AGAIN BASE ON THE R-20.
05:47:31PM OUR REPORT IS BASED ON R-35.
05:47:34PM BUT THE COMP PLAN ESTABLISHES BASIS OF REVIEW.
05:47:39PM SOME THINGS TO ENUMERATE IN THE REPORT THAT SOMETHING THE
05:47:43PM PLAN SAYS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.
05:47:46PM AS PART OF THAT, WE CALCULATE THE DENSITY FOR THE R-20 WHICH
05:47:49PM IS 13 UNITS ON THIS SITE AS OF RIGHT OR 18 UNITS WITH THE
05:47:53PM BONUS PROVISION WHICH COULD COME BEFORE YOU AS A PD.
05:47:57PM THERE IS A PD ALREADY ON THE SITE THAT WAS -- FROM THE 2004
05:48:02PM REZONING CYCLE FOR SEVEN SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
05:48:06PM THAT, HOWEVER, IS BEYOND THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD WHERE THEY CAN
05:48:09PM STICK TO THEIR PLAN EVEN IF IT THE CODE CHANGES.
05:48:12PM SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK IN TO DO THE SEVEN UNITS AND
05:48:15PM MAKE SURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CODE.
05:48:18PM WE DON'T KNOW IF THEY DO OR NOT BUT DEPENDS ON WHAT THEY
05:48:22PM PROPOSE.
05:48:23PM CHANCES ARE THEY WILL BE BACK WITH ANOTHER PD BECAUSE IT IS
05:48:27PM SO OLD.
05:48:28PM 13 UNITS FOR THE R-20.
05:48:31PM AND YOUR OBJECTION WOULD STILL STAND BASED ON THE POLICIES
05:48:34PM THAT WERE ALREADY PRESENTED.
05:48:36PM THANK YOU.
05:48:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:48:40PM PETITIONER?
05:48:48PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:48:48PM MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.
05:48:51PM IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT SOMETHING WAS RECEIVED
05:48:54PM IN TAMPA CITY COUNCIL'S MAILBOX AND PLACED INCORRECTLY OR
05:49:00PM INADVERTENTLY TO ANOTHER CASE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
05:49:04PM I WOULD LIKE TO PLACE THAT INTO THE RECORD FOR THIS CASE.
05:49:07PM AND, SIR, THIS IS WHAT WAS RECEIVED SO YOU CAN HAVE A COPY
05:49:13PM OF IT AND ADDRESS IT IF YOU FEEL THE NEED TO.
05:49:15PM >> I APPRECIATE THAT.
05:49:19PM I WILL LOOK AT IT AND ADDRESS IT IN REBUTTAL IF NECESSARY.
05:49:22PM FOR THE RECORD, STEVEN THOMPSON.
05:49:24PM AN AMERICAN WITH NED THOMPSON --
05:49:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I DO APOLOGIZE.
05:49:28PM MR. SHELBY, I AM SORRY, I THINK WE NEED SOME CLARIFICATION
05:49:32PM WHAT JUST HAPPENED.
05:49:33PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHAT JUST HAPPENED WAS THAT SOMETHING CAME
05:49:36PM INTO TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO YOUR MAILBOX.
05:49:40PM DURING THE COURSE OF -- MAY I HAVE IT -- UNLESS COUNCIL
05:49:47PM WISHES TO SEE IT.
05:49:48PM I WILL MAKE COPIES OF IT.
05:49:49PM BUT IT CAME IN TODAY AT 10 A.M.
05:49:53PM AND I DON'T BELIEVE IT WAS SENT INTO THE QUASI BOX OR DIDN'T
05:49:56PM MAKE -- IT WAS -- BECAUSE THIS IS NOT QUASI JUDICIAL.
05:50:01PM THIS IS LEGISLATIVE.
05:50:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: CAN YOU MAKE COPIES AND WHILE THE PETITIONER
05:50:05PM IS GIVING HIS PRESENTATION, YOU CAN THEN GIVE IT TO US
05:50:08PM AFTERWARDS.
05:50:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: ABSOLUTELY.
05:50:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: AFTER YOU MAKE COPIES.
05:50:12PM >> I APPRECIATE THAT.
05:50:12PM STEVEN THOMPSON.
05:50:14PM AN ATTORNEY WITH IF THOMPSON.
05:50:17PM AND I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT.
05:50:19PM THE STAFF REALLY MADE AN EXCELLENT PRESENTATION.
05:50:22PM WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE STAFF REPORT AND THE
05:50:25PM RECOMMENDATIONS.
05:50:25PM AGAIN, AS YOU HEARD, WE INITIALLY MADE A PROPOSAL FOR
05:50:30PM THE R-35, BUT AFTER HEARING SOME OF THE COMMENTS AND THE
05:50:33PM CONCERNS, CERTAINLY BY THE CITY PLANNING STAFF AND THE
05:50:35PM RESIDENTS, WE AGREED TO THE R-20.
05:50:38PM AND THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
05:50:40PM THE R-20 CLASSIFICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
05:50:46PM PLAN.
05:50:46PM AND ALSO COMPATIBLE WITH THIS AREA.
05:50:48PM THE STAFF REPORT CITES MANY POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
05:50:54PM PLAN THAT REALLY SUPPORT THIS REQUEST.
05:50:55PM I THINK ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ONES IS THAT THE
05:50:59PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THAT THE CITY OF TAMPA IS
05:51:03PM GROWING.
05:51:04PM AND THERE IS A NEED TO PLAN FOR THAT GROWTH.
05:51:07PM YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CERTAINLY ENCOURAGES GROWTH IN
05:51:12PM PRESIDENT URBAN VILLAGES.
05:51:14PM THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN AN URBAN VILLAGE AND IS
05:51:18PM APPROPRIATE FOR THE ADDITIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
05:51:21PM WE ARE REALLY NOT TALKING ABOUT SIGNIFICANT GROWTH.
05:51:24PM WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, MULTIFAMILY.
05:51:28PM WE ARE TALKING ABOUT -- REALLY LOW INTENSITY GROWTH AND I
05:51:33PM THINK I AM GOING TO HAVE MY CLIENT, THE DEVELOPER, TALK A
05:51:35PM LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT THE PLANS MAY INCLUDE.
05:51:37PM BUT, AGAIN, WHAT WE ARE SEEKING TO DO IS PROVIDE ADEQUATE
05:51:44PM PLAN PROPERTY TO MEET TAMPA'S GROWTH IN THE FUTURE.
05:51:47PM ONE OF THE POLICIES THAT THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
05:51:57PM PLAN SEEKS TO ENCOURAGE NEW HOUSING ON VACANT PROPERTIES.
05:52:02PM AND, AGAIN, FOR -- FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THIS PROPERTY HAS
05:52:06PM BEEN VACANT FOR 30 YEARS.
05:52:09PM THE LAST PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THIS PROPERTY WAS BACK
05:52:12PM IN 1989.
05:52:14PM AND THERE CERTAINLY HAVEN'T BEEN ANY DEVELOPMENT SINCE THAT.
05:52:17PM IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
05:52:19PM YOUR PLAN ALSO ENCOURAGES THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFILL
05:52:23PM PROPERTIES.
05:52:23PM THIS IS AN INFILL PROPERTY.
05:52:25PM AND CERTAINLY UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTIES.
05:52:29PM BEING VACANT FOR 30 YEARS CERTAINLY INDICATES THAT THIS
05:52:32PM PROPERTY HAS BEEN UNDERUTILIZED.
05:52:34PM THIS MEETS THE CRITERIA OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
05:52:37PM BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND THE CITY STAFF
05:52:42PM DETERMINED THIS REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE R-20
05:52:48PM PLANNING CLASSIFICATION.
05:52:49PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTUALLY APPROVED THE R-20
05:52:53PM UNANIMOUSLY.
05:52:54PM BUT, AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS,
05:53:00PM THIS DOESN'T GIVE US ANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
05:53:02PM AND I THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT.
05:53:04PM REALLY THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
05:53:08PM WHAT WE ARE GOING TO BE DOING IS COMING BACK WITH A PLANNED
05:53:11PM DEVELOPMENT, A PLAN.
05:53:12PM AND WE ARE GOING TO MEET WITH THE COMMUNITY.
05:53:15PM WE ARE GOING TO MEET WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND COME
05:53:19PM BACK WITH A PLAN THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA AND
05:53:23PM CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES CONTAINED IN YOUR COMPREHENSIVE
05:53:26PM PLAN.
05:53:27PM BUT, AGAIN, I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT THAT, AGAIN, YOUR
05:53:30PM APPROVAL -- IF YOU APPROVE IT TONIGHT, IT DOESN'T GIVE THE
05:53:34PM APPLICANT ANY AUTHORIZATION TO MOVE FORWARD.
05:53:38PM THIS IS REALLY THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS.
05:53:39PM AND WE ARE COMMITTED TO WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
05:53:43PM COMMUNITY AND THE PLANNING STAFF TO COME BACK TO YOU
05:53:49PM ULTIMATELY IF YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE A DECISION ABOUT THE
05:53:51PM PLAN.
05:53:51PM WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD TO GETTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
05:53:55PM BEGIN THAT PROCESS.
05:53:56PM I AM GOING TO HAVE THE DEVELOPER JUST COME UP AND TALK A
05:53:59PM LITTLE BIT ABOUT SOME OF HIS IDEAS FOR THIS PROPERTY.
05:54:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: SIR.
05:54:06PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:54:07PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:54:09PM >> YES, SIR.
05:54:10PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THIS IS FOR STAFF.
05:54:11PM I AM CONFUSED.
05:54:13PM I THINK WE HAD THIS SITUATION BEFORE.
05:54:15PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LAST WEEK.
05:54:16PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I DON'T KNOW WHY THEY COME HERE WHEN OBJECT
05:54:23PM JUBILEE THERE WAS AN ISSUE.
05:54:24PM I THOUGHT WE DISCUSS THAT LAST TIME.
05:54:28PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
05:54:30PM STAFF.
05:54:30PM SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID -- THIS IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT
05:54:33PM THAN THE CASE THAT I BELIEVE YOU ARE REFERRING TO A COUPLE
05:54:36PM OF WEEKS AGO.
05:54:36PM BECAUSE IN THIS CASE AT THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
05:54:39PM VOTED ON A RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:54:41PM SO YOU DO HAVE A CONSISTENCY FINDING IN FRONT OF YOU FOR THE
05:54:45PM RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:54:46PM THE APPLICANT DID NOT AMENDS THE REQUEST AFTER THE PLANNING
05:54:49PM COMMISSION.
05:54:49PM THEY AMENDED IT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING, AGREED
05:54:53PM TO THE RESIDENTIAL-20, AND THAT IS WHAT WAS VOTED ON.
05:54:56PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I DON'T SEE, I SEE R-10 OR 35.
05:55:08PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: THERE WILL BE A SUBSTITUTE MOTION, BUT
05:55:13PM THE RESOLUTION IN THE PACKET STATES WHAT HAPPENED AT THE
05:55:15PM PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING THAT AFTER THE TESTIMONY, THE
05:55:17PM APPLICANT REDUCED THE REQUEST TO RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:55:20PM SO THAT RESOLUTION IS REFLECTED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:55:23PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MISS VELEZ.
05:55:30PM I DIDN'T SEE THIS.
05:55:32PM I AM SORRY.
05:55:32PM IT WAS UNDER SOME OTHER PAPERS HERE.
05:55:35PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
05:55:42PM DEPARTMENT.
05:55:42PM THERE IS A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE I GAVE TO CITY COUNCIL.
05:55:47PM I DIDN'T WANT TO PRESUPPOSE YOUR ACTION SO I DIDN'T GET UP
05:55:50PM BEFORE HAND, BUT A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE IF YOU PLAN TO MOVE
05:55:55PM THIS FORWARD.
05:55:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:55:57PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:55:59PM LAST TIME WE HAD ONE OF THESE SOMETHING THAT THE PLANNING
05:56:01PM COMMISSION HAD REJECTED.
05:56:02PM SOMETHING THAT 80 SOMETHING -- 87 AND BROUGHT DOWN TO 50,
05:56:07PM BUT THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEVER SAW -- OR NEVER -- NEVER
05:56:11PM REGISTERED THEIR OPINION ON ONE THAT WAS 50; HOWEVER, ON
05:56:16PM THIS CASE MR. BENSON MUFFLED OUT SAYING -- WE WOULD HAVE
05:56:20PM VOTED THE SAME WAY IF IT WAS R-35 OR R-20.
05:56:24PM THAT'S CORRECT, MR. BENSON?
05:56:26PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU CAN ANSWER ON RECORD.
05:56:28PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST WANT TO KNOW ON THE RECORD BECAUSE
05:56:30PM I DON'T WANT TO GET -- AND THIS --
05:56:34PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THE QUESTION IS FOR MR. BENSON.
05:56:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COME TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE.
05:56:40PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: SO TO BE CLEAR.
05:56:42PM WE DID NOT REVIEW FOR THE R-20.
05:56:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE.
05:56:48PM GIVE US YOUR NAME.
05:56:49PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING.
05:56:53PM IF YOU ASK FOR A CATEGORY BUMP UP, TWO BUMPS UP LIKE THIS
05:56:57PM ONE, WE HAVE TO IDENTIFY WHAT THE INTERIM CATEGORY AND OFFER
05:57:01PM IT AS AN ALTERNATIVE.
05:57:03PM THAT WAS WRITTEN IN THE STAFF REPORT.
05:57:04PM AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD MEETING, THE APPLICANT AT
05:57:08PM THE MEETING ASKED THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER THE IMMEDIATE
05:57:13PM CATEGORY.
05:57:14PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION --
05:57:16PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IN OTHER WORDS, YOU WENT FROM -- WHAT IS
05:57:18PM IT, R-10 TO -- YOU -- WHEN YOU GO TO 35, YOU ALSO REVIEWED
05:57:24PM IN ESSENCE THE R-20.
05:57:27PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: REQUIRED IN THE PLAN TO TELL YOU WHAT THAT
05:57:29PM INTERIM DENSITY WILL BE.
05:57:30PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:57:32PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
05:57:34PM STAFF.
05:57:34PM THE SAME LOGIC FOLLOWS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
05:57:37PM REPORT.
05:57:38PM THAT IS WHY THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DOESN'T
05:57:40PM CHANGE EITHER ON THIS REQUEST.
05:57:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:57:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK: MR. BENSON, STAY RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE BECAUSE
05:57:49PM THE PETITIONER SAID THAT YOU FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
05:57:52PM BUT YOU TOLD US THAT YOU FOUND IT INCONSISTENT.
05:57:57PM CAN YOU PLEASE CLARIFY THAT.
05:58:00PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THE CITY STAFF DOES NOT OFFER CONSISTENCY.
05:58:04PM WE JUST OFFER OBJECTIONS.
05:58:05PM OUR OBJECTION WAS BASED ON THE R-35.
05:58:08PM BUT WE IDENTIFIED AS R-20 AS THE ALTERNATIVE IN THE STAFF
05:58:13PM REPORT.
05:58:14PM WE DID NOT REVIEW THE R-20.
05:58:16PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID.
05:58:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WE ARE BACK WHERE WE WERE LAST WEEK.
05:58:20PM >> THE PETITIONER.
05:58:22PM STAFF RECOMMENDED R-20 IN THEIR REPORT.
05:58:26PM SAYS STAFF RECOMMENDS AN R-20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
05:58:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: STATE YOUR NAME.
05:58:35PM >> CHARLIE THOMAS, SIR.
05:58:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU ONE OF THE PETITIONERS.
05:58:38PM >> YES.
05:58:39PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
05:58:41PM STAFF.
05:58:41PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:58:43PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:58:46PM STAFF DID NOT REVIEW RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:58:48PM BUT THE VOTE WAS FOR RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:58:49PM THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS CASE AND THE OTHER CASE
05:58:53PM BEFORE YOU BECAUSE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS A BODY THOUGHT
05:58:56PM THAT THE RESIDENTIAL-20 WAS MORE APPROPRIATE, SO YOU HAVE A
05:59:00PM RECOMMENDATION FROM THAT VOTING BODY OF APPOINTED OFFICIALS
05:59:03PM FOR THE RESIDENTIAL-20.
05:59:04PM YOU DID NOT HAVE THAT ON OTHER CASE YOU THINKING OF.
05:59:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
05:59:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE CITY NEVER -- NEVER PASS JUDGMENT ON
05:59:15PM THE 20.
05:59:16PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I WILL LET STEVEN BENSON ANSWER THAT.
05:59:19PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THE ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT.
05:59:22PM HE SHOWED YOU THE BOTTOM -- BUT THE ANALYSIS BASED ON
05:59:27PM THE R-35.
05:59:27PM ALL THE POLICIES.
05:59:29PM THE PLAN SAYS IF YOU HAVE AN CATEGORY, YOU HAVE TO OFFER THE
05:59:33PM ALTERNATIVE MIRANDA THE LEGAL PART OF MY MIND SAYING WATCH
05:59:38PM OUT.
05:59:40PM >> AGAIN CHARLIE THOMAS --
05:59:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WILL RECOGNIZE YOU --
05:59:44PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. BENSON.
05:59:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN GUDES, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
05:59:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I UNDERSTAND YOU ARE CRITIQUING THE NUMBER,
05:59:54PM BUT WHAT STILL LIES, IS STAFF IN CONCURRENCE WITH THE
06:00:00PM PLANNING COMMISSION WITH THE R-20?
06:00:04PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: OUR ANALYSIS WAS BASED ON THE R-35.
06:00:07PM SO WE WOULD HAVE TO DO -- WE WOULD HAVE TO READ IT OF
06:00:10PM THE R-20 AND COMPARE IT TO THE POLICIES AND CIRCULATE FOR
06:00:14PM REVIEW OF ALL THE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS.
06:00:17PM THE DEPARTMENTS REVIEWED 35.
06:00:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA IS SHOWING US A DOCUMENT THAT
06:00:24PM YOU ARE RECOMMENDING --
06:00:26PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE R-35, YES.
06:00:29PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOMMENDING IT AS AN ALTERNATIVE,
06:00:33PM THAT MEANS THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO IT, CORRECT?
06:00:37PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THE BASIS OF REVIEW FOR THE PLAN SAYS THAT
06:00:39PM WE HAVE TO RECOMMEND AN ALTERNATIVE IF IT WAS IN THE MIDDLE.
06:00:42PM SO THE RECOMMENDATION IS NOT THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE
06:00:45PM STAFF.
06:00:45PM THE RECOMMENDATION IS IF CITY COUNCIL BELIEVES THE R-10 IS
06:00:50PM NOT APPROPRIATE AND WANTS ANOTHER ACTION THAN WHAT IS WHAT
06:00:54PM THE R-20.
06:00:55PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: PUTS US IN A POSITION OF KAY YEARS.
06:00:57PM WHERE ARE WE GOING NOW.
06:00:59PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: WE DIDN'T HAVE THE LUXURY TO RE-REVIEW OF
06:01:03PM THE R-20 BASED ON HOW IT WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS.
06:01:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:01:08PM I SAW YOU GO FOR YOUR BUTTON.
06:01:12PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM GOOD.
06:01:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS COUNCIL CONFIDENT THAT WE CAN HEAR THIS?
06:01:17PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
06:01:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU SURE?
06:01:19PM I WANT A MOTION TO END DISCUSSION.
06:01:22PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO MOVED.
06:01:23PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: SHE HAVEN'T FINISHED THEIR HEARING.
06:01:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THIS DISCUSSION.
06:01:29PM MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:01:31PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:01:33PM ALL IN FAVOR.
06:01:34PM PETITIONER, PLEASE PROCEED.
06:01:35PM >> APPRECIATE THAT.
06:01:37PM >> GOOD AFTERNOON, CHARLIE THOMAS WITH THE PETITIONER.
06:01:42PM THANKS FOR YOUR TIME.
06:01:44PM JUST A HISTORY ON THE PROPERTY.
06:01:48PM THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT AS STEPHEN SHARED THREE
06:01:54PM DECADES.
06:01:55PM ONE OF THE ORIGINAL -- YOU SEE THE ELMO, ONE OF THE
06:01:58PM INDIVIDUAL SITE PLANS --
06:02:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: CAN YOU TURN THAT AWAY IN SUCH A MANNER THAT
06:02:03PM -- THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:02:04PM >> DATING BACK TO '89 APPROVED BY COUNCIL WAS A COMMERCIAL
06:02:11PM PIECE OF PROPERTY HERE.
06:02:12PM -- OUR APPROACH IS TO MEET WITH STAFF AND FIND WHAT IS
06:02:20PM CONSISTENT AND MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND
06:02:23PM THE NEIGHBORS TO FIND A PLAN THAT IS A APPROPRIATE.
06:02:25PM WE WORKED WITH THIS BODY PRIOR TO -- WITH ANOTHER PARCEL IN
06:02:30PM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS THAT WAS VACANT FOR 20 YEARS AGO.
06:02:36PM OUR APPROACH TO THIS IN CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING
06:02:39PM COMMISSION IS THAT THOSE VACANT PIECES OF PROPERTY THAT ARE
06:02:41PM IN THE URBAN CENTERS THAT ARE LOCATED ON A COLLECTOR ROAD.
06:02:49PM NONLOCAL ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION UNDERUTILIZED THAT WE GO
06:02:53PM AND REDEVELOP THOSE.
06:02:56PM OUR REQUEST WILL BE TO FIND IT CONSISTENT AND WE WILL COME
06:03:01PM BACK BEFORE THIS BODY ON THE PD PROCESS TO COME UP WITH A
06:03:04PM PLAN THAT WILL WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AS WE
06:03:06PM HAVE IN THE PAST TO COME UP WITH A PRODUCT THAT THEY FIND
06:03:09PM ACCEPTABLE.
06:03:09PM WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH OUR NEIGHBORS.
06:03:11PM WE ARE CURRENTLY NOT IN FULL AGREEMENT.
06:03:14PM THEY ARE 7 AND LOOKING TO INCREASE THE DENSITY TO MEET THE
06:03:20PM NEED THAT WE HAVE IN THE COMMUNITY.
06:03:21PM WE WERE -- WE WERE DOING A PROJECT ON NEBRASKA THAT WE
06:03:25PM BROUGHT BEFORE THIS BOARD.
06:03:27PM NEBRASKA AND MLK, ANOTHER CORNER THERE.
06:03:31PM WE PUT 13 UNITS THERE.
06:03:32PM AND OUR GOAL IS TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
06:03:36PM THE MIX THERE, WE HAVE A SCHOOL TEACH FROM HILLSBOROUGH HIGH
06:03:40PM SCHOOL.
06:03:41PM WE HAVE THREE SETS OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS.
06:03:45PM AND WE HAVE A SET OF COLLEGE KIDS AT U.T. THAT IS THERE.
06:03:48PM WE FIND BLIGHTED PROPERTY.
06:03:51PM WE COME BACK.
06:03:52PM WE PROVIDE AFFORDABLE -- AND AFFORDABLE IS RELATIVE TODAY
06:03:57PM WITH PRICES GOING UP.
06:03:58PM HOUSING THAT IS NEEDED IN THE CITY.
06:04:00PM I JUST WANTED TO BRING -- WE MET WITH THE CITY AND WE ARE
06:04:09PM OKAY -- I WOULD LIKE -- I WOULD REQUEST APPROVAL TODAY, BUT
06:04:12PM IF NOT, WE ARE OKAY.
06:04:13PM I JUST WANT FOR CLARITY, THE CITY RECOMMENDED THIS.
06:04:17PM WE SPOKE WITH CITY STAFF AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE R-20
06:04:21PM IS IN THEIR REPORT, THAT -- I DON'T -- I DON'T NECESSARILY
06:04:26PM KNOW THAT THEY HAVE TO OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE.
06:04:30PM THEY SAID WE WOULD RECOMMEND R-20 WHICH IS A POINT WE SHARED
06:04:34PM AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEN WE AGREED TO THAT BECAUSE WE
06:04:36PM ARE LOOKING FOR AGREEMENT.
06:04:37PM IF STAFF IS IN AGREEMENT, WE ARE IN AGREEMENT AND WE CAN
06:04:41PM WORK THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND THE SAME COMMITMENT WORKING
06:04:44PM WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AS WE HAVE IN THE PAST TO
06:04:47PM GET THIS PROJECT COMPLETED AND MAKING THIS A USEFUL PIECE.
06:04:50PM THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PRESSURE OF TRAFFIC PUT INTO THE
06:04:56PM NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE IT IS -- N. BOULEVARD AND THERE IS A --
06:05:00PM WORKING ALLEY BEHIND THE PROPERTY.
06:05:02PM THERE IS A SIMILAR SITUATED PROPERTY FARTHER WEST DOWN THE
06:05:07PM STREET WHERE THEY HAVE PROPERTY THAT FACES NORTH BAY AND
06:05:14PM USES ALLEY ACCESS FOR ANCILLARY STRUCTURE.
06:05:19PM WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR SUPPORT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:05:22PM THANK YOU.
06:05:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
06:05:27PM COUNCILMAN VIERA -- LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT COUNCILMAN
06:05:30PM VIERA IS WITH US.
06:05:30PM YOU ARE THERE WITH US, COUNCILMAN VIERA.
06:05:33PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I AM.
06:05:35PM I HAD TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES BEING ON.
06:05:38PM I HAVE BEEN ON FOR 45 MINUTES.
06:05:40PM BUT, YEAH, I AM ON.
06:05:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:05:44PM COUNCILMAN VIERA, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
06:05:46PM PETITIONER.
06:05:47PM >>LUIS VIERA: NO, SIR, THANK YOU.
06:05:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO QUESTIONS FOR OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS.
06:05:51PM ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE COUNCIL CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO
06:05:55PM SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-16.
06:05:57PM >> YES.
06:06:02PM HAROLD HOLDER WITH BUSH ROSS LAW FIRM, 1801 NORTH HIGHLAND.
06:06:11PM I'M HERE ON MY CLIENTS 4104 NORTH LYNN AVENUE, WHICH IF YOU
06:06:17PM SEE UP ON THE SCREEN, THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
06:06:21PM THIS IS THEIR PROPERTY HERE.
06:06:23PM FOR DECADES, THERE WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON SUBJECT SITE.
06:06:28PM ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO, THE DEVELOPER REPLATTED IT SO THERE WILL
06:06:32PM BE SEVEN TOWN HOMES THAT ARE SHOWN HERE.
06:06:34PM UNDER THE CURRENT DENSITY R-10, THOSE SEVEN TOWN HOMES COULD
06:06:39PM BE BUILT.
06:06:39PM SEVEN-FOLD INCREASE IN PRIOR DENSITY AND ALL OF THE DENSITY
06:06:43PM IN THE SURROUNDING SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:06:46PM MY CLIENTS AND AT LEAST 167167 OF THEIR NEIGHBORS AND I HAVE
06:06:51PM THE PETITION THAT I WILL ENTER TODAY OPPOSE THIS REQUEST TO
06:06:54PM DOUBLE THE DENSITY OF THIS SITE.
06:06:57PM THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD OF SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS IS
06:07:01PM FILLED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
06:07:02PM IT BORDERS THE RIVER.
06:07:03PM BORDERS MLK.
06:07:05PM ON THE FRONTAGE OF MLK THERE IS SOME COMMERCIAL USE.
06:07:09PM SON THE FRONTAGE OF FLORIDA WHICH IS THE OTHER BORDER THERE
06:07:13PM IS COMMERCIAL USE.
06:07:14PM BUT INSIDE THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS ALL, YOU KNOW -- IT'S ABOUT
06:07:20PM 1250 HOMES.
06:07:21PM AND THAT -- THIS IS FROM THE CITY'S WEB SITE, THE
06:07:24PM NEIGHBORHOOD GUIDE.
06:07:25PM DOUBLING THE FUTURE DENSITY -- SO WE THEN ALLOW FOR A
06:07:32PM TEN-FOLD INCREASE IN THE DENSITY COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE
06:07:36PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:07:36PM THAT SHOULD NOT AND CANNOT HAPPEN FOR SEVERAL REASONS.
06:07:39PM FIRST, PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS AND DUE PROCESS ISSUES.
06:07:42PM THE MANY ONE BEING THAT THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT.
06:07:46PM THE -- THE PROPERTY OWNER IN THE AFFIDAVIT IS PAUL SIERRA
06:07:53PM HOLDINGS FORMALLY KNOWN AS NORTH BAY REAL ESTATE
06:07:59PM HOLDINGS, LCC.
06:07:59PM IF YOU LOOK AT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WEB SITE OWNED BY 610
06:08:03PM EQUITY GROUP LCC.
06:08:06PM NO AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PEOPLE THAT YOU HEARD FROM TODAY
06:08:09PM TO SUBMIT THE APPLICATION.
06:08:10PM THEY WERE AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER FOR THE PLANNING
06:08:14PM COMMISSION.
06:08:14PM IT FAILS FOR DAY ONE BECAUSE OF THAT ISSUE.
06:08:17PM AND IT CAN'T GO FORWARD.
06:08:18PM IT ALSO FAILS ON THE MERITS.
06:08:20PM THERE ARE OTHER DUE PROCESS ISSUES WITH THE SIGNAGE.
06:08:23PM THINGS THAT WERE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PLANNING
06:08:26PM COMMISSION.
06:08:26PM THEY DID THE SAME THING WITH THE SIGNAGE IF ONLY SEE IT AND
06:08:30PM YOU TURN THE CORNER ON THE CORNER BUT NOT IF YOU ARE DRIVING
06:08:35PM NORTH TO THE PARK OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:08:36PM CERTAINLY WHEN THE WORD GOT OUT, WE COLLECTED ALL THESE
06:08:41PM PETITIONS TO ADDRESS THE MERITS.
06:08:44PM THE PLAN CRITERIA -- THIS IS FROM THE STAFF REPORT AT PAGE
06:08:49PM 60, TALKS WHEN YOU SHOULD AMEND THE PLAN.
06:08:51PM AND IT TALKS ABOUT THIS BEING A MAJOR POLICY DECISION.
06:08:55PM IT SHOULD ONLY BE DONE WHEN THE THOUGHTFUL ADOPTION OF THE
06:08:59PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT HAS ALREADY TAKEN PLACE IS NO LONGER
06:09:03PM APPROPRIATE AND TALKS THAT THAT COULD HAPPEN IF THERE IS A
06:09:07PM SIGNIFICANT CHANGE ORDER ROAR IN THE PLAN.
06:09:08PM A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE ORDER ROAR IN THE PLAN.
06:09:11PM NOTHING BEFORE THIS BODY AND NOTHING BEFORE THE PLANNING
06:09:13PM COMMISSION THAT SUGGESTS THAT.
06:09:14PM AND YOU WILL SEE THERE IS -- THERE IS AN AREA DESIGNATED
06:09:21PM RESIDENTIAL-20 TO THE NORTH OF HERE.
06:09:23PM THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DEVELOPED AS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
06:09:25PM THEY ARE BEING BUILT NOW.
06:09:26PM THEY WILL BE THERE FOR YEARS.
06:09:28PM EVEN THIS ONE AREA IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGNATED AS R-20 IS
06:09:32PM GOING TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
06:09:34PM SO THE APPLICANT HAS NO GOOD REASON FOR THIS.
06:09:38PM YOU HEARD HOW THE PROCESS WAS A MESS.
06:09:40PM THEY ASKED FOR CMU-35 IN THE INITIAL APPLICATION.
06:09:44PM THEY DIDN'T GET IT.
06:09:46PM THEY WENT DOWN TO R-20.
06:09:48PM R-35 AT THE MEETING THEN TO R-20 AND NOT HOW THE PROCESS
06:09:53PM SHOULD WORK.
06:09:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:09:54PM >> I WOULD LIKE TO TENDER THE PETITIONS.
06:09:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. SHELBY, CAN YOU MAKE A STATEMENT ON THE
06:10:05PM PETITIONS, PLEASE?
06:10:06PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, WITH REGARD FOR PETITIONS.
06:10:08PM REMEMBER, COUNCIL, PETITIONS IN QUASI JUDICIAL MATTERS ARE
06:10:13PM NOT COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
06:10:16PM BUT COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE DOES NOT COMPLY TO
06:10:21PM LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS.
06:10:24PM I WILL PASS THEM AROUND AND ASK YOU TO PLACE THEM INTO THE
06:10:28PM RECORD.
06:10:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ACCEPT THEM INTO THE RECORD, ALSO THE E-MAIL
06:10:30PM GIVEN PROVIDED TO US.
06:10:31PM WE WILL ALSO HAVE THAT TOO.
06:10:33PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, PLEASE.
06:10:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:10:36PM ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME ON
06:10:56PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-16?
06:11:01PM >> YES, SIR.
06:11:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PLEASE PROCEED.
06:11:02PM >> JOHN MOLL, 4104 NORTH LYNN AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
06:11:08PM I LIVE WITHIN A BLOCK OF THIS APPLICANT'S PROPERTY FOR 70
06:11:13PM YEARS.
06:11:13PM SO I AM PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA.
06:11:15PM AND I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU -- HE MENTIONED THAT THERE WAS A
06:11:20PM WORKING ALLEY BETWEEN THIS PROPERTY 610 AND THE COMMERCIAL
06:11:25PM PROPERTY ON -- I CALL IT BUFFALO, BUT THEY CHANGED THE NAME
06:11:32PM TO MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
06:11:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: DID THAT SOME TIME AGO.
06:11:35PM >> AND THIS IS A PICTURE OF THAT ALLEY THAT HAS SERVED AS
06:11:40PM A BUFFER SINCE 1908.
06:11:43PM I HAVE IT HERE.
06:11:44PM IF THAT SHOWS UP GOOD.
06:11:47PM WHICH IS -- IT GOES ALL THE WAY FROM N. BOULEVARD TO LYNN,
06:11:51PM AND IT CONTINUES ON DOWN TO OLA.
06:11:54PM AND IT IS USED BY PEOPLE WALKING THEIR DOGS AND IT IS A
06:11:58PM PUBLIC AREA THAT CARS CAN DRIVE ON.
06:12:01PM AND THEY DO DRIVE ON TO GET ACCESS TO AIRBNBS THAT ARE ON
06:12:06PM THAT ALLEY, AS WELL AS TO THE LAW OFFICES AND THE MEDICAL
06:12:10PM OFFICES THAT ARE FACING MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
06:12:12PM AND THIS HAS SERVED AS A BUFFER FROM PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO
06:12:18PM CHANGE THE DENSITY UP OR DOWN WHO WERE ON MARTIN LUTHER
06:12:25PM KING, JR.
06:12:25PM BACK IN 1990, THEY APPROACHED US AND SAID THEY WANTED TO
06:12:29PM BUILD A PARKING LOT ON NORTH BAY TO ACCOMMODATE A SECOND
06:12:33PM STORY ON A LAW OFFICE THAT WAS ON MLK.
06:12:37PM AND THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TEAM SAID NO WAY.
06:12:41PM YOU ARE NOT COMING OVER INTO A RESIDENTIAL AREA THAT HAS
06:12:44PM BEEN THERE FOR 100 YEARS AND CHANGE IT TO SOMETHING JUST TO
06:12:49PM ACCOMMODATE SOMEBODY ON MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
06:12:52PM THEN THAT -- AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS A NICE ALLEY.
06:12:58PM IT SEPARATES THE PEOPLE FROM MLK FROM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA
06:13:05PM THAT HAS BEEN THERE FOR -- SINCE 1907.
06:13:09PM AND THIS -- THIS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE, ATTACHMENT E
06:13:18PM APPLICATION.
06:13:18PM PLEASE NOTE THOUGH, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAVE REVIEWED
06:13:22PM THE APPLICATION FOR SUFFICIENCY STATEMENTS OR MATERIALS
06:13:25PM PROVIDED IN THE SUBMITTAL ARE THE APPLICANT'S OWN FINDING
06:13:30PM AND HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
06:13:33PM THEY CAN SAY ANYTHING IN THE WORLD.
06:13:35PM THEY CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS AN ARTERIOLE -- ARTERIAL ROAD
06:13:44PM N. BOULEVARD AND SPEED LIMIT 15 MILES PER HOUR AND TWO LANES
06:13:48PM DESIGNATED FOR BICYCLE.
06:13:50PM I GOT BEHIND A BICYCLE GOING 5 MILES PER HOUR AND CREPT
06:13:54PM ALONG BUT THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO DO THAT.
06:13:56PM I THINK THAT IS KIND OF MISLEADING TO SAY THAT -- THAT
06:14:00PM TRAFFIC AREA AROUND THIS WILL ACCOMMODATE THIS HIGHER
06:14:04PM DENSITY TWICE WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR.
06:14:07PM I CAN GO ON, BUT HOPEFULLY YOU WILL SAY NO TO THIS
06:14:13PM APPLICATION AND PERHAPS SOMEBODY ELSE WILL HAVE A BETTER
06:14:16PM REASON THAN I DO.
06:14:17PM THANK YOU.
06:14:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:14:18PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
06:14:25PM I AM TERESA GOLDBERG AND A RESIDENT OF NORTH BAY.
06:14:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: WERE YOU SWORN?
06:14:34PM >> HAS ANYBODY ELSE?
06:14:35PM DO I NEED TO BE SWORN IN?
06:14:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO, YOU ARE FINE.
06:14:38PM >> I WANT TO TAKE AN ISSUE OF CITY STAFF UNDER THEIR
06:14:41PM OBLIGATION TO REVIEW THE LOWER LEVEL FROM THE R-35 TO
06:14:45PM THE R-20 AS THE DEVELOPER CHARLIE THOMAS CAME UP AND STATE
06:14:48PM THAT THEY APPROVED THAT.
06:14:49PM NOT WHAT HAPPENED HERE.
06:14:51PM A WHOLE DEBATE ABOUT THAT.
06:14:52PM IT WAS REVIEWED.
06:14:53PM NOT APPROVED AND NOT REVIEWED IN ITS ENTER TEE BY THE CITY
06:14:57PM STAFF.
06:14:58PM SO TO COME UP HERE AND SAY THAT IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THEM
06:15:01PM IS DISINGENUOUS.
06:15:04PM AS RESIDENTS AND MANY ARE HERE ON THE AND MANY HAVE SIGNED
06:15:08PM PETITIONS AND HAVE BEEN HERE AT PREVIOUS PLANNING HEARINGS
06:15:11PM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:15:12PM WE ARE OPPOSED TO THIS BECAUSE THERE IS NOT THE
06:15:15PM INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL LAND USE AND
06:15:18PM DENSIFICATION OF THIS ONE LOT, RIGHT.
06:15:20PM RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE A 14-FOOT SIX-INCH STREET ON WEST NORTH
06:15:26PM BAY.
06:15:26PM IT CAN NOT SUPPORT TWO-WAY TRAFFIC AS IS.
06:15:28PM WE ARE ONE BLOCK OFF OF MLK.
06:15:31PM PEOPLE CUT THROUGH TO MISS THE TRAFFIC AND EVERYTHING.
06:15:35PM WE DO NOT HAVE CONTINUOUS SIDEWALKS.
06:15:36PM WEAPON DON'T HAVE SIDEWALKS.
06:15:37PM THAT IS AN ISSUE.
06:15:39PM SIGNIFICANT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.
06:15:41PM I WALK TEN MILES A DAY UP AND DOWN THE STREET IN THAT
06:15:44PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:15:44PM AND I CAN TELL THAT YOU THERE IS A PROBLEM.
06:15:48PM AND TO INCREASE THE TRAFFIC TO THIS AREA IS CRAZY.
06:15:52PM IT IS JUST NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE.
06:15:56PM IN ADDITION, WHEN YOU THINK OF ALL THE ADDITIONAL UNITS YOU
06:15:59PM WANT TO PUT THERE, RIGHT.
06:16:01PM WHERE IS THE OVERFLOW PARK.
06:16:03PM WE DON'T HAVE STREET PARKING.
06:16:04PM N. BOULEVARD WILL NOT ACCOMMODATE STREET PARKING.
06:16:07PM EACH SINGLE LANE TWO-WAY STREETS.
06:16:10PM WEST NORTH BAY AND N. BOULEVARD.
06:16:12PM YOU DO NOT HAVE INCREASED LAND USE ON THESE PARTICULAR
06:16:16PM ROADS.
06:16:16PM YOU HAVE IT ON MLK WHICH IS FOUR LANES ACROSS PRESIDENT
06:16:19PM COMMERCIAL USE AND RESIDENTIAL USE ON THAT.
06:16:21PM BUT FOUR LANES ACROSS.
06:16:23PM WE ALSO COUPLED WITH THIS CURRENT R-20, RIGHT.
06:16:28PM WE HAVE THE CHURCH LOT, WHICH WAS A CHURCH LOT NOT USED FOR
06:16:32PM THE FIVE YEARS THAT I LIVED THERE, BUT BUILDING 13
06:16:35PM SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
06:16:36PM YOU COMBINE THAT WITH THE ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, POPULATION
06:16:40PM GROWTH AND UNIT GROWTH ON THIS ONE CORNER WHICH IS LESS THAN
06:16:44PM A BLOCK AWAY, YOU ARE GOING TO DROWN THIS BEAUTIFUL
06:16:47PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:16:47PM I UNDERSTAND URBAN.
06:16:50PM I LIVED IN NEW YORK CITY FOR 50 YEARS OF MY LIFE BEFORE I
06:16:53PM MOVED HERE FIVE YEARS AGO.
06:16:54PM I UNDERSTAND IT.
06:16:55PM I UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS TO PARK ON A STREET, TO PARALLEL
06:16:59PM PARK.
06:16:59PM TO LOOK FOR PARKING.
06:17:00PM I GET IT.
06:17:01PM YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS GOING TO DO FOR THIS
06:17:04PM NEIGHBORHOOD THAT CANNOT SUPPORT IT.
06:17:05PM YOU DON'T HAVE ONE-WAY STREETS.
06:17:07PM TWO-WAY STREETS THAT CANNOT SUPPORT TWO-WAY TRAFFIC YOU LOOK
06:17:11PM AT A REGULAR SUV, SIX FEET ACROSS WITH PEOPLE COMING PAST.
06:17:15PM YOU CAN'T PASS.
06:17:16PM NO SIDEWALKS FOR PEDESTRIANS.
06:17:18PM YOU TALK ABOUT HAVING ADDITIONAL LAND USE AND POPULATION,
06:17:21PM WHERE IS THE SANITATION GOING TO GO?
06:17:23PM WHERE IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THIS INCREASED
06:17:27PM POPULATION GROWTH.
06:17:29PM YOU DON'T HAVE PROPER SETBACK FOR SANITATION.
06:17:32PM WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PUT THEIR GARBAGE?
06:17:35PM IT WILL THE CITY ON A RESIDENTIAL STREET.
06:17:36PM WE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
06:17:37PM THE CHURCH LOT BIGGER DID NOT BUILD A 20-STORY BUILDING.
06:17:41PM SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES COMMENSURATE WITH THE REST OF THE
06:17:44PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:17:44PM THE SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION HAD TO LEAVE
06:17:49PM BUT SOMEONE ELSE WILL READ THEIR STATEMENT.
06:17:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:17:53PM >> HELLO, EVERYBODY.
06:17:58PM I WAS NOT EXPECTING TO READ THIS, BUT, YOU KNOW, WE JUMP IN
06:18:02PM AND DO OUR PART.
06:18:03PM MY NAME IS PATRICK GORE.
06:18:05PM I AM A 20 SOME ODD RESIDENT OF SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, THIRD
06:18:11PM GENERATION TAMPA I AM READING THIS ON BEHALF OF EMILY
06:18:16PM PERKINS, THE SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION WAS
06:18:21PM UNABLE TO BE HERE.
06:18:22PM SO I GOT THIS TO READ.
06:18:28PM BEAR WITH ME.
06:18:29PM BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT, THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION -- I DON'T KNOW
06:18:31PM WHO SAID IT OVER HERE OPPOSES THIS.
06:18:34PM BUT WE WILL GET TO THE LONG FORM HERE.
06:18:38PM HELLO, COUNCIL.
06:18:39PM MY NAME IS EMILY PERKINS AND VICE PRESIDENT OF SOUTH
06:18:42PM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
06:18:44PM OUR PRESIDENT SHIRLEY HARTFIELD HAS AN EXTENDED ILLNESS THAT
06:18:49PM PREVENTED HER FROM SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION THIS EVENING.
06:18:51PM BOTH OF US OPPOSE THIS CHANGE OF LAND USE DESIGNATION AT
06:18:57PM NORTH BAY STREET AND SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OF THE SEMINOLE
06:19:02PM HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT.
06:19:03PM TODAY YOU WILL NOT FIND ONE R-20 DES WILLING NATION FOR 14
06:19:08PM UNITS ON A LOT SIZE.71 ACRES OR LESS.
06:19:12PM OR ANY 14-UNIT OR LARGER COMPLEX THAT IS BORDERED BY TWO
06:19:19PM REGULAR NARROW CITY STREETS.
06:19:20PM THE ONLY PLACE YOU DO FIND SEVERAL MULTISTORY R-20 AND
06:19:26PM LARGER DESIGNATIONS THROUGHOUT THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OVERLAY
06:19:29PM DISTRICT ARE ALL DEVELOPED TO FRONT ONE OF OUR FOUR-LANE
06:19:33PM STATE HIGHWAYS LIKE DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD,
06:19:37PM FLORIDA AVENUE, EAST HILLSBOROUGH OR NEBRASKA.
06:19:39PM EACH OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS BORDER ONLY ONE SINGLE CITY
06:19:44PM STREET.
06:19:44PM THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THAT CRITERIA.
06:19:48PM WE WISH TO KEEP IT THIS WAY FOR SEVERAL REASONS.
06:19:51PM NARROW TWO-LANE STREETS THAT BORDERED THIS PROPERTY ARE NOT
06:19:55PM SUITED FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC.
06:19:56PM WEST NORTH BAY STREET IS ONLY 17 FEET WIDE AND ONLY SLOPPY
06:20:01PM DIRT FOR CURBING ON THE STREET AND MINIMUM WIDTH FOR EVEN
06:20:05PM RURAL ROAD, SMALLEST DESCRIBED ROAD IN TRAFFIC PLAN IS A
06:20:08PM MINIMUM OF 20 FEET WIDE.
06:20:10PM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS EVERY CASE OF WHICH THE MULTIAPARTMENT
06:20:15PM COMPLEXES BUILT HAVE CAUSED SIGNIFICANT PARKING OVERFLOW AND
06:20:18PM TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ON THAT STREET.
06:20:21PM THE ONE COMPLEX WE HAVE ON SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS AT NORTH
06:20:25PM FLORIDA AVENUE IN GIDDENS HAVE CAUSED ONGOING PARKING
06:20:29PM PROBLEMS THAT EXTEND TWO FULL BLOCKS FROM FLORIDA AVENUE
06:20:31PM OVER TO HIGHLANDS.
06:20:33PM SEE PICTURES.
06:20:34PM HERE IS ONE OF THE PICTURES THERE.
06:20:36PM AND ANOTHER ONE THERE.
06:20:39PM SINCE ARMATURE WORKS WAS BUILT, NORTH BOULEVARD TRAFFIC HAS
06:20:50PM SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED.
06:20:52PM HORRIBLY.
06:20:53PM AND IT IS USED AS A SHORTCUT BY SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, RIVERSIDE
06:20:58PM HEIGHTS AND TAMPA HEIGHTS TO REACH ARMATURE WORKS AND SOUTH
06:21:01PM TAMPA.
06:21:02PM THERE IS NO LEFT-TURN TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON MLK AND WILL BE
06:21:07PM REQUIRED TO MEET THE PROPERTY.
06:21:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WILL GIVE YOU 30 SECONDS MORE.
06:21:11PM >> TO FDOT SINCE 2016 TO INSTALL THIS BUT HAVE REPEATEDLY
06:21:17PM ANSWERED WITH A NO.
06:21:18PM TRAFFIC TURNING DOWN THE SPEED.
06:21:19PM TURNING NORTH.
06:21:21PM SPEED UP DOWN THE THAT ARE ROW STREET INCREASING DENSITY AND
06:21:24PM MAKING IT MORE DANGEROUS.
06:21:25PM SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS BOASTS THE HIGHEST HISTORIC HOME
06:21:29PM PERCENTAGES IN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT.
06:21:32PM 70% OF OUR PNEUMONIA SOUTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS BETWEEN 1900 AND
06:21:37PM 1959.
06:21:39PM WE LOVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND CHARMING AESTHETICS OF OUR
06:21:42PM HOMES.
06:21:42PM DON'T WANT TO SET DANGEROUS PRECEDENT AND RUIN THE CHARM OF
06:21:46PM OUR ENTIRE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT.
06:21:48PM IF THIS LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGES, DEVELOPERS WILL SEEK
06:21:53PM TO BUILD ADDITIONAL MULTISTORY APARTMENT COMPLEXES THAT
06:21:57PM BORDER THREE SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS.
06:21:58PM WOULD YOU LIKE A 14-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX BUILT NEXT TO
06:22:03PM YOUR HOUSE ON YOUR STREET?
06:22:04PM THESE ARE ALL RESIDENTIAL STREETS.
06:22:06PM THE EXAMPLES GIVEN PRIOR ARE SPECIFICALLY ON COMMERCIAL
06:22:10PM STREETS.
06:22:10PM TO PUT IT SIMPLY, THIS IS AN APPLES AND ORANGES SORT OF
06:22:18PM COMPARISON THAT IS BEING MADE TO JUSTIFY THIS BUILDING OR AS
06:22:22PM MY MOM WOULD SAY, THIS IS, YOU KNOW ARROZ MANGO.
06:22:30PM ALL MIXED UP.
06:22:32PM THANK YOU.
06:22:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PETITIONER, I WILL ALLOW YOU THE 30 SECONDS
06:22:43PM IF NEEDED IN THE REBUTTAL.
06:22:45PM >> HELLO, MEGAN EUKER AND, AS WELL, A RESIDENT IN THE
06:22:52PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:22:52PM 4105 NORTH LYNN.
06:22:54PM I WOULD LIKE TO READ THE EXCERPT, IN THE EVENT THAT CITY
06:22:59PM COUNCIL DETERMINES THAT THE ABOVE CRITERIA ARE NOT MET, CITY
06:23:03PM COUNCIL CAN DENY THE AMENDMENT.
06:23:04PM IF CITY COUNCIL MAKES A DETERMINATION THAT THE EXISTING LAND
06:23:07PM USE CLASSIFICATION IS NO LONGER IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE
06:23:10PM PUBLIC, IT MAY APPROVE THE AMENDMENT OR DIRECT THE LOCAL
06:23:14PM PLANNING AGENCY TO PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE AMENDMENT TO THE
06:23:19PM EXISTING LAND USE CLASSIFICATION.
06:23:21PM IF A LAND USE IS CHANGED BASED ON THIS CRITERIA, THE
06:23:26PM PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE THROUGH A SITE PLAN DISTRICT AND IF
06:23:30PM PROVIDED IN THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT SHALL MEET THE
06:23:33PM DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE CRITERIA UNLESS THE
06:23:37PM DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN AN APPROVED COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
06:23:40PM ADOPTED FORM BASE CODE AREA IN WHICH CASE A SITE PLAN ZONING
06:23:45PM MAY NOT BE REQUIRED AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN IN
06:23:49PM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
06:23:50PM SO IT SEEMS THAT THE CITIZENS OF THIS AREA CAN JUST SAY NO.
06:23:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:24:00PM >> HELLO, CITY COUNCIL RESPECTFULLY.
06:24:06PM MY NAME IS BILL WINER.
06:24:10PM I AM A RECENT RESIDENT OF THIS AREA.
06:24:12PM I HAVE BEEN THERE TWO YEARS.
06:24:14PM MY HOUSE FACES NORTH BAY STREET ONE BLOCK EAST OF THE SITE.
06:24:22PM TO BACK OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY, I HAVE TO TURN TWICE BECAUSE THE
06:24:26PM STREET IS SO NARROW WITHOUT HITTING JOHN'S PROPERTY BEHIND
06:24:30PM IT.
06:24:30PM IT JUST SIMPLY DOESN'T SUPPORT THAT KIND OF USE.
06:24:35PM YOU CAN NOT -- A DELIVERY TRUCK WILL COME BY, AND YOU CAN'T
06:24:39PM GET BY THE TRUCK UNTIL HE IS DONE AND MOVED HIS TRUCK OUT OF
06:24:43PM THE WAY.
06:24:43PM VEHICLES CANNOT PASS EACH OTHER ON THE ROAD.
06:24:45PM TO INTRODUCE VOLUMES OF PEOPLE COMING BACK AND FORTH,
06:24:50PM CUTTING AROUND THE BLOCK TO SHORTCUT MLK AND THE TRAFFIC
06:24:59PM LIGHTS WILL BE A HAZARD FOR CHILDREN AND THE BABY CARRIAGES
06:25:02PM THAT THE RESIDENTS WALK DOWN THE STREET WITH NO SIDEWALKS.
06:25:04PM THEY ARE ON THEIR STREET WALKING THE KIDS AND FAMILIES AND
06:25:07PM DOGS AND IT IS VERY DIFFICULT.
06:25:12PM AND I WOULD NOT SEE THE SITE FROM MY HOUSE, BUT THE TRAFFIC
06:25:15PM AND THE SUPPORT OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE WOULD BE UNTENABLE.
06:25:18PM THANK YOU.
06:25:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:25:20PM YES, IF THERE IS GOING -- YES, SIR.
06:25:27PM PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM.
06:25:29PM IF THERE ARE GOING TO BE ANY SPEAKER, FORM A LINE TO MY
06:25:33PM LEFT.
06:25:33PM >> THIS WILL BE REAL BRIEF.
06:25:35PM CHRIS STACH.
06:25:37PM I LIVE AROUND THE CORNER ON CLEARFIELD.
06:25:40PM THIS WHOLE THING IS KIND OF -- SEEMS KIND OF RIDICULOUS.
06:25:44PM 20 UNITS IN THERE.
06:25:45PM AND THE THOUGHT IN MY BRAIN WAS, OKAY, SUPER BOWL PARTY.
06:25:49PM HOW MANY -- HOW MANY EXTRA SPACES AND THERE ARE NONE, WHERE
06:25:55PM ARE THE CARS GOING TO GO?
06:25:57PM I MEAN IT KIND OF LITTLE BIT RIDICULOUS.
06:25:59PM AND THEN YOU -- YOU HAVE STORMWATER RUNOFF.
06:26:03PM THEY ARE TAKING.7 ACRES AND PUTTING -- BASICALLY BLOCKING IT
06:26:10PM OFF.
06:26:10PM WHERE DOES THE WATER GO?
06:26:12PM NOW YOU HAVE ALL THOSE ISSUES.
06:26:13PM AND, YOU KNOW, THE ARGUMENT IS LIKE GIVE ME A MILLION
06:26:20PM DOLLARS.
06:26:20PM ANYBODY WANT -- I WILL TAKE $500,000.
06:26:23PM THAT IS THE ARGUMENT OF R-35 TO R-20.
06:26:28PM IT IS ALMOST LIKE -- I DON'T KNOW, YOU KNOW.
06:26:32PM I AM KIND OF PERPLEXED BY THE ARGUMENT.
06:26:35PM IT IS R-10 BUT ASK FOR R-35 BUT GIVE US R-20.
06:26:42PM IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE AND JUST -- LIKE EVERYONE
06:26:47PM ELSE SAID, THE AREA CANNOT SUPPORT THAT KIND OF
06:26:50PM DENSIFICATION.
06:26:50PM YOU KNOW.
06:26:51PM SIX UNITS?
06:26:53PM YEAH, OKAY.
06:26:53PM EIGHT UNITS MAYBE, BUT NOT 20.
06:26:56PM IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.
06:27:00PM SO THANK YOU.
06:27:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:27:02PM >> JESUS URENA.
06:27:08PM I AM A RESIDENT OF 4109 LYNN AVENUE.
06:27:12PM JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM THERE.
06:27:14PM AND I'M HERE TO OPPOSE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT AS STATED.
06:27:21PM AND I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT IN HEARING THEIR STATEMENT,
06:27:26PM THEY SAY THEY REACHED OUT TO THE COMMUNITY, THE NEIGHBORS.
06:27:28PM I'M HERE TO SAY THEY DID NOT.
06:27:31PM THEY DID NOT.
06:27:32PM I NEVER HEARD FROM THEM ASKING US HOW WE FELT ABOUT IT.
06:27:36PM SO THAT WAS A LITTLE MISLEADING ON THEIR PART.
06:27:39PM WE HAVE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:27:43PM THE -- THE LOT IS PROBABLY THREE TIMES AS BIG AS THAT ONE.
06:27:48PM THEY ARE PUTTING 13 HOUSES ON IT.
06:27:51PM AND THAT'S A LOT.
06:27:52PM IT WAS ALREADY APPROVED FOR ANOTHER SECTION BUT THEY BUILD
06:27:58PM FOUR MORE HOUSES OR FIVE MORE HOUSES IN ADDITION TO THE 13.
06:28:02PM NOW IF THEY WANT TO ADD AN APARTMENT COMPLEX RIGHT THERE.
06:28:06PM WE CAN NOT SUPPORT IT.
06:28:07PM WE DON'T HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
06:28:09PM I INVITE TO YOU COME WALK THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH US, AT ANY
06:28:13PM TIME.
06:28:14PM AND YOU WILL SEE THE NIGHTMARE THAT WE FACE EVERY SINGLE DAY
06:28:17PM WITH TRAFFIC, NO SIDEWALKS, AND TO ADD MORE RESIDENTS TO THE
06:28:21PM AREA, I UNDERSTAND WE NEED MORE DEVELOPMENT, BUT THIS IS
06:28:27PM JUST NOT THE RIGHT PLACE TO DO IT.
06:28:28PM THANK YOU.
06:28:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:28:30PM AND IF I SEE NO MORE SPEAKERS STANDING IN LINE, THEN THIS
06:28:38PM WOMAN WILL BE THE LAST SPEAKER.
06:28:39PM >> GOOD EVENING.
06:28:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: GOOD EVENING.
06:28:42PM >> MY NAME IS PATRICIA MOLL.
06:28:45PM I LIVE 4104 LYNN AVENUE.
06:28:48PM I HAVE HERE THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE AREA THAT MY HUSBAND'S
06:28:59PM -- I DON'T KNOW WHICH WAY --
06:29:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THAT IS GOOD.
06:29:02PM RIGHT LIKE THAT.
06:29:05PM >> THAT MY HUSBAND'S GRANDMOTHER AND GRANDFATHER PURCHASED
06:29:10PM IN 1908 TO BUILD A HOUSE.
06:29:12PM SO WE ARE A HISTORICAL COMMUNITY.
06:29:17PM WE HAVE BEEN THERE A LONG TIME.
06:29:19PM AS ONE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE SAID, MOST OF OUR HOUSES ARE OLD
06:29:24PM HOUSES.
06:29:25PM THE DEVELOPER, WHEN HE PURCHASED THE SIGN ON THE -- ON THE
06:29:31PM -- FOR SALE SIGN SAID SEVEN HOUSES COULD BE BUILT.
06:29:39PM AND SO I THINK THAT FOR HIM TO THEN DECIDE, WELL, HE COULD
06:29:48PM MAKE MORE MONEY AND COME BEFORE YOU AND MAKE -- BUILD MORE
06:29:56PM HOUSES, MY CONCERN IS THAT WHAT THIS IS, IS THE NOSE -- THE
06:30:04PM CAMEL'S NOSE IN THE TENT.
06:30:08PM IF YOU PUT -- IF YOU HAVE BEEN ON N. BOULEVARD SOUTH OF
06:30:15PM MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., YOU KNOW THAT THEY ARE BUILDING AND
06:30:17PM BUILDING AND BUILDING APARTMENTS.
06:30:18PM AND SO MY CONCERN IS THAT WEST OF N. BOULEVARD, THERE ARE A
06:30:31PM LOT OF HOUSES THAT HAVE VERY DEEP LOTS.
06:30:34PM WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS THAT THEY WILL COME BACK TO YOU -- COME
06:30:40PM BACK TO YOU AND SAY, WELL, YOU HAD THAT APARTMENT ACROSS
06:30:44PM FROM THERE.
06:30:45PM SO LET'S JUST GO ON DOWN UNTIL WE GET TO THE CORIAN CHURCH
06:30:54PM SO THE WHOLE THING WILL BE APARTMENTS.
06:30:57PM AND WHEN THE DEVELOPER SAY IS HE IS WANTING TO BUILD
06:31:01PM AFFORDABLE HOUSING, NEW HOUSES IN OUR AREA EASILY GO FOR A
06:31:08PM MILLION DOLLARS NOW.
06:31:09PM AND SO I DON'T THINK ANY DEVELOPER IS GOING TO COME INTO
06:31:15PM THIS -- INTO THIS -- TO OUR COMMUNITY AND DECIDE THAT THEY
06:31:20PM ARE GOING TO BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSES WHEN THEY CAN BUILD
06:31:26PM 700,000 AND $800,000 AND $900,000 AND $1 MILLION HOUSE.
06:31:32PM I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD HELP US TO PROTECT THIS HISTORIC
06:31:39PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:31:40PM AND AS JESUS SAID, THEY HAVE NOT REACHED OUT TO US.
06:31:49PM AND THEY -- AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THEY TOLD US THAT
06:31:52PM THEY WOULD.
06:31:53PM THEY HAVE NOT.
06:31:54PM THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:31:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:31:57PM DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS -- DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ONLINE?
06:32:10PM THANK YOU.
06:32:11PM REBUTTAL.
06:32:12PM >> YEP, CHARLIE THOMAS.
06:32:15PM THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THE TIME.
06:32:16PM I AM SORRY I HAVEN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH MRS.
06:32:20PM JESUS.
06:32:20PM I SPOKE TO MY FRIEND AND -- I SPOKEN TO MY NEIGHBORS ON
06:32:24PM SEVERAL OCCASIONS AT THEIR APARTMENT.
06:32:26PM MY PARTNER HAS SPOKEN TO THEM AT OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE
06:32:29PM SITE.
06:32:30PM I HAVE TALKED TO THE OTHER NEIGHBORS DOWN THE STREET.
06:32:33PM JUST TO GET CLARITY ON OUR STREET BETWEEN NORTH BAY --
06:32:37PM BETWEEN LYNN AND N. BOULEVARD, I THINK THERE ARE SIX NEW
06:32:44PM HOUSES THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT DURING THIS TIME PERIOD.
06:32:47PM THE HOUSE DIRECTLY ACROSS IS NEW.
06:32:49PM THE REMODELLED HOUSE JUST EAST AND TWO NEW CONSTRUCTIONS AS
06:32:55PM YOU GO DOWN THE STREET 37 AND YOU WORK YOUR WAY DOWN N.
06:32:58PM BOULEVARD, DEVELOPMENT IS COMING.
06:33:00PM SO THE CHALLENGE IS, HOW DO WE BALANCE THE DEVELOPMENT AS WE
06:33:05PM SPEAK.
06:33:05PM YOU GO DOWN N. BOULEVARD FROM MLK GOING NORTH, I THINK EVERY
06:33:12PM HOUSE ACCEPT FOR MAYBE ONE OR TWO ON N. BOULEVARD ON THE
06:33:16PM EAST SIDE ARE BRAND-NEW.
06:33:18PM IT'S CHANGING THE -- THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS CHANGED AND WILL
06:33:22PM CONTINUE TO CHANGE IN HOUSING AND BRINGING THE DENSITY THAT
06:33:27PM IS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:33:28PM TO ANSWER THE OWNERSHIP QUESTION, WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY.
06:33:32PM WE WERE UNDER CONTRACT WITH PAUL SIERRA AND 610 EQUITY
06:33:38PM GROUP.
06:33:38PM WE OWN 610 EQUITY GROUP.
06:33:42PM THAT IS THE CHAIN OF OWNERSHIP.
06:33:47PM I WANTED TO BRING CLARITY TO THAT.
06:33:50PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO THE ISSUE THAT WAS RAISED.
06:33:53PM YOU ARE SAYING YOU ARE NOT THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR
06:33:56PM YOU --
06:33:58PM >> WE WERE BOTH.
06:33:58PM AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WHILE UNDER CONTRACT AND TOOK
06:34:02PM OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY.
06:34:03PM AFTER THE PROCESS.
06:34:07PM AFTER WE STARTED THE PROCESS.
06:34:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ARE YOU THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY?
06:34:21PM >> YES, SIR.
06:34:21PM LET ME -- TO CLARIFY HOW WE GOT TO THE CMU-35.
06:34:27PM WHEN WE FIRST TOOK -- TALKED TO CITY STAFF ON THE
06:34:30PM DEVELOPMENT SIDE, THERE WAS A SIMILAR SITUATED PROPERTY JUST
06:34:34PM NORTH -- JUST SOUTH OF MLK THAT CAME BEFORE YOU THAT IS IN
06:34:39PM THE TAMPA HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT BUT IT WAS ALL
06:34:43PM RESIDENTIAL.
06:34:44PM AND THE COUNCIL TURNED THAT PROJECT DOWN BECAUSE IT DIDN'T
06:34:47PM HAVE ANY COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS.
06:34:48PM THAT IS HOW WE GOT TO -- WHEN WE WERE TALK WITH STAFF, WE
06:34:55PM HAD A SIMILAR PROJECT OF WHICH WE ARE PROPOSING.
06:34:58PM THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED AND THIS IS WHY IT HAPPENED.
06:35:01PM THAT'S HOW WE GOT TO THE CMU-35.
06:35:04PM BECAUSE THE R-20 DIDN'T ALLOW FOR US TO USE A COMMERCIAL USE
06:35:09PM IF COUNCIL SAW THAT WAS THE DIRECTION THAT THEY WANTED TO GO
06:35:12PM IN.
06:35:12PM AS WE WERE GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS.
06:35:14PM WE WERE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:35:16PM AND THAT'S WHERE WE WERE ALWAYS I MEANABLE TO R-20.
06:35:22PM BUT THAT'S WHERE THE RM-35 CAME FROM.
06:35:25PM >> APPRECIATE THAT, STEVEN THOMPSON.
06:35:28PM ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT.
06:35:30PM A LOT OF THE ISSUES BROUGHT UP BY THE OPPOSITION ARE REALLY
06:35:33PM SITE PLAN ISSUES AND WILL BE DEALT WITH LATER IN THE PROCESS
06:35:36PM AND I WANT TO MAKE THE RECORD CLEAR, WE ARE NOT GOING TO PUT
06:35:40PM MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY.
06:35:42PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS WHAT SHOULD BE GUIDING THE COUNCIL
06:35:47PM IN THE CITY.
06:35:47PM WE FOLLOWED THE PLAN.
06:35:49PM I MEAN, WHEN WE MET WITH THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT, WE ALWAYS
06:35:54PM SAID WHAT IS APPROPRIATE.
06:35:56PM WHAT IS A CONSISTENT LAND USE.
06:35:58PM THAT IS HOW WE GOT TO WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW.
06:36:00PM BASED UPON THE POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
06:36:03PM PUBLIC HEARING.
06:36:04PM YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED IT.
06:36:08PM FIND IT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:36:12PM WE ARE ALSO NOT ASKING FOR DEVELOPMENT AT THIS POINT IN
06:36:16PM TIME.
06:36:16PM WE KNOW WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THAT PLANNED
06:36:19PM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
06:36:19PM I AM GOING TO MAKE THE REPRESENTATION, WE ARE GOING TO MEET
06:36:22PM WITH THE COMMUNITY.
06:36:23PM IT IS GOING TO BE A PLAN THAT IS GOING TO BE DISCUSSED WITH
06:36:27PM THE COMMUNITY.
06:36:27PM WE ARE NOT GOING TO COME HERE WITHOUT HAVING THAT -- THAT
06:36:30PM INPUT.
06:36:30PM BUT, AGAIN, WE ARE GOING TO DEVELOP A SITE PLAN THAT IS
06:36:34PM CONSISTENT WITH YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:36:36PM WE ARE GOING TO WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY.
06:36:38PM AND WITH YOUR STAFF TO COME BACK AND PRESENT THIS PLAN.
06:36:41PM WE WOULD REQUEST THE APPROVAL SO WE CAN MOVE THIS PROCESS
06:36:45PM FORWARD.
06:36:45PM OTHER THING I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION, THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN
06:36:48PM VACANT FOR 30 YEARS.
06:36:50PM IT IS ABOUT TIME THAT WE GET SOME DEVELOPMENT ON THIS
06:36:54PM PROPERTY.
06:36:54PM THANK YOU.
06:36:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER FURTHER QUESTIONS?
06:37:04PM SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ.
06:37:04PM YOU ARE STANDING THERE.
06:37:06PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR, SUSAN
06:37:08PM JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
06:37:09PM I DO WANT TO JUST MENTION, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE THE
06:37:13PM APPLICANT HAS SAID SEVERAL TIMES NOW THAT A LOT OF THESE
06:37:16PM ISSUES WILL BE DEALT WITH AT SITE PLAN AND WHEN WE DO THE
06:37:21PM REZONING AND COME BACK WITH A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THIS
06:37:23PM PROPERTY.
06:37:24PM I WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL -- AND YOU DO HAVE IN THE VERY LAST
06:37:27PM ATTACHMENT F TO THE STAFF REPORT FROM THE PLANNING
06:37:31PM COMMISSION, THERE IS THREE OR FOUR PAGES THAT TALK ABOUT
06:37:35PM WHAT IS HAPPENING WHEN YOU ARE ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
06:37:38PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:37:39PM AND WHAT THAT MEANS.
06:37:40PM SO I JUST WANT TO READ A LITTLE BIT FROM THAT.
06:37:43PM IT AIR ISES AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IN
06:37:46PM PARTICULAR IS A DECLARATION THAT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
06:37:49PM PATTERN INITIALLY SOUGHT BY THE CITY IN A PARTICULAR
06:37:52PM LOCATION THROUGH THOUGHTFUL ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
06:37:55PM PLAN IS NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
06:37:57PM AND SO PART OF WHAT YOU ARE DECIDING IS WHETHER OR NOT
06:38:02PM THE R-10 AT THIS LOCATION IS NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
06:38:05PM AND IF -- IF YOU BELIEVE IT STILL IS APPROPRIATE, THEN, YOU
06:38:11PM KNOW, YOU SHOULD LET THAT GUIDE YOUR DECISION ON THIS
06:38:15PM APPLICATION TO DOUBLE THE DENSITY.
06:38:17PM IT ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE FACT THAT AMENDMENTS SHOULD NOT
06:38:21PM OCCUR WITH THE SAME FREQUENCY AS PARTIAL REZONINGS AND
06:38:24PM EFFECT UPON THE ENTIRE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCLUDING THE
06:38:27PM PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE POLICY SHIFT SIGNIFIED BY THE
06:38:31PM AMENDMENT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED.
06:38:32PM AND I ALSO WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL, YOU KNOW, PROPERTY
06:38:37PM CHANGES HANDS ALL THE TIME.
06:38:39PM THIS PARTICULAR POLICY CHANGED HANDS WHILE THIS APPLICATION
06:38:43PM WAS BEING PROCESSED.
06:38:44PM THE STATEMENTS MADE BY THE APPLICANT IN FRONT OF YOU
06:38:47PM SHOULDN'T -- I DON'T WANT TO SAY SHOULDN'T BE TAKEN AS TRUE
06:38:50PM -- I AM SURE THEY ARE TRUE, BUT A LOT OF THINGS CAN HAPPEN
06:38:53PM IN THE INTERIM BETWEEN THE TIME YOU MAKE THE COMPREHENSIVE
06:38:55PM PLAN CHANGE AND THE TIME THAT THE PROPERTY IS ULTIMATELY
06:38:59PM DEVELOPED.
06:38:59PM THE QUESTION BEFORE COUNCIL IS, WHETHER THE R-10 CONTINUES
06:39:02PM TO BE APPROPRIATE OR WHETHER A CHANGE IN THIS AREA SP A MORE
06:39:09PM AAPPROPRIATE DESIGNATION.
06:39:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:39:14PM >>BILL CARLSON: CAN YOU OR SOMEONE ON BEHALF CONFIRM THAT
06:39:19PM THE THE APPLICANT IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
06:39:21PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I BELIEVE THAT MISS MALONE HAS SPOKEN
06:39:24PM TO THE APPLICANT AND I BELIEVE -- THE GENTLEMAN THAT IS HERE
06:39:27PM IS A REPRESENTATIVE.
06:39:28PM 610 --
06:39:31PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
06:39:32PM STAFF.
06:39:32PM THE APPLICANT CONFIRMED TO ME THAT HE IS THE OWNER OF THE
06:39:36PM PROPERTY.
06:39:36PM THAT OF THE 610 ENTITY AND HE IS WITH THE PLANNING SUPPORT
06:39:40PM SERVICES WHICH IS ON THE AFFIDAVIT.
06:39:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
06:39:49PM MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:39:51PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:39:53PM ALL IN FAVOR?
06:39:55PM WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNCIL?
06:40:04PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:40:04PM >>LYNN HURTAK: FILE NUMBER FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-16 DENYING AN
06:40:10PM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
06:40:15PM PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND PROPERTY LOCATED 610 WEST
06:40:20PM NORTH BAY STREET FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO RESIDENTIAL-20 --
06:40:27PM PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY DOESN'T REALLY
06:40:33PM MATTER.
06:40:33PM STOP RIGHT THERE.
06:40:34PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
06:40:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:40:39PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:40:41PM ANY -- PLEASE, GO RIGHT AHEAD.
06:40:44PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF SOMETHING YOU WANT TO HAVE IN THE RECORD
06:40:46PM IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION SO THAT IF IT IS EVER OF ISSUE --
06:40:50PM >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY.
06:40:50PM YOU TOLD ME THESE WERE UP AND DOWN AND I DIDN'T NEED TO DO
06:40:54PM THIS.
06:40:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THEY ARE NOT UP AND DOWN A DIFFERENT
06:40:57PM STANDARD.
06:40:57PM SORRY FOR INTERRUPTING.
06:40:59PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM HAPPY TO ADD IT.
06:41:01PM THAT IT DOES NOT FIT WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:41:05PM AND IT IS NOT IN HARMONY WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD AND
06:41:10PM -- AND NOT IN CHARACTER OR SCALE WITH THE GENERAL COMMUNITY.
06:41:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:41:21PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:41:22PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
06:41:24PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
06:41:26PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
06:41:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
06:41:33PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
06:41:35PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
06:41:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
06:41:39PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
06:41:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
06:41:42PM MOTION FAILED -- MOTION PASSED.
06:41:48PM UNANIMOUSLY.
06:41:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
06:41:55PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-17.
06:42:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, SORRY TO INTERRUPT.
06:42:03PM CLARIFICATION TO THE CLERK.
06:42:04PM THAT IS THE MOTION TO DENY PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
06:42:07PM THANK YOU.
06:42:08PM >>CLERK: CORRECT.
06:42:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF WE CAN EXIT THE CHAMBERS QUIETLY, PLEASE.
06:42:19PM >> GOOD EVENING, KATRINA COCORAN TO DISCUSS EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE,
06:42:36PM IF FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-17.
06:42:38PM BACKGROUND, PRIVATELY INITIATED, SMALL SCALE.
06:42:41PM .5 ACRES IN SIZE AND THE REQUEST TO MOVE FROM RESIDENTIAL-10
06:42:45PM TO RESIDENTIAL-20.
06:42:46PM THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THIS PLAN AMENDMENT IS WITHIN THE
06:42:52PM UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT.
06:42:54PM IT IS WITHIN THE NORTH TAMPA COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT
06:42:57PM IS WEST OF A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR NORTH NEBRASKA
06:43:02PM AVENUE.
06:43:02PM THE SUBJECT STREET IS LOCATED HERE.
06:43:06PM YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE BLUE BOX.
06:43:08PM IT IS SOUTH OF EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE, WEST OF NORTH NEBRASKA
06:43:14PM AVENUE, AND EAST OF INTERSTATE 275.
06:43:16PM THIS SHOWS THE SUBJECT SITE AT 701 EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
06:43:23PM THIS SHOWS THE SUBJECT SITE FACING WEST TOWARD INTERSTATE
06:43:29PM 275.
06:43:29PM THIS IS FACING WEST TOWARD I-275 NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
06:43:38PM THIS IS LINEBAUGH AVENUE FACING EAST.
06:43:42PM AGAIN NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
06:43:43PM THIS IS LINEBAUGH AVENUE FACING NORTH FLORENCE AVENUE NORTH
06:43:50PM OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
06:43:51PM THIS SHOWS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
06:43:57PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY THE DASHED LINE.
06:44:00PM CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL-10 AND IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH AND
06:44:03PM NORTH, YOU WILL SEE MORE RESIDENTIAL-10.
06:44:05PM HOWEVER, TO THE EAST AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, A LITTLE
06:44:08PM FURTHER OUT, YOU WILL SEE RESIDENTIAL-20, COMMUNITY
06:44:14PM COMMERCIAL 35 AS WELL AS A PLOT OF RESIDENTIAL-35.
06:44:16PM THIS SHOWS THE SUBJECT SITE MOVING TO RESIDENTIAL-20.
06:44:23PM THE EXISTING UNITS ALLOWED WILL BE ABOUT FIVE WITH THE
06:44:31PM POTENTIAL FOR TEN WITH THIS CHANGE.
06:44:33PM EXISTING NONRESIDENTIAL WILL WILL BE ABOUT 7600 SQUARE FEET.
06:44:38PM WITH THAT CHANGE BEING 10800 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL.
06:44:44PM ALLOW FOR INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ALLOWING FOR
06:44:47PM HIGHER DENSITY AND INTENSITY.
06:44:49PM ANY NONRESIDENTIAL USES MUST MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
06:44:57PM THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF DID OBJECT TO THIS PLAN AMENDMENT
06:45:01PM AND THEY ARE HERE TO PROVIDE FURTHER COMMENTS ON THAT.
06:45:04PM PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE
06:45:09PM FOLLOWING PLAN POLICIES INCLUDING CREATING HOUSING
06:45:12PM OPPORTUNITIES IDEALLY UTILIZING UNDERUTILIZED LAND, TARGETED
06:45:16PM GROWTH AREAS SERVED BY GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES AND TRANSIT AND
06:45:20PM PROVIDING TRANSITIONS IN DENSITY.
06:45:23PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP
06:45:26PM AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
06:45:30PM POLICIES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:45:32PM WITH THAT, I CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION AND OPEN TO ANY
06:45:35PM QUESTIONS.
06:45:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS?
06:45:38PM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:45:39PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, MA'AM, CAN YOU PUT THE MAP UP, THE
06:45:43PM GOLD, RED AND BROWN BACK AGAIN.
06:45:47PM >> WITH THE PROPOSED OR THE CURRENT FUTURE?
06:45:51PM .
06:45:52PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE CURRENT LAND USE.
06:45:54PM AND CURRENT LAND USE IS R-10, CORRECT?
06:46:08PM >> YES.
06:46:08PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
06:46:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:46:12PM THANK YOU.
06:46:12PM MR. BENSON.
06:46:16PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING STAFF.
06:46:19PM JUST TO CLARIFY STAFF'S OBJECTION.
06:46:21PM DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE R-10 AND R-10.
06:46:26PM R-20 ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY USES AND R-10, SINGLE-FAMILY FAMILY
06:46:32PM USE'.
06:46:32PM AFTER THIS OCCURS, THE AVAILABLE ZONING DISTRICTS UNDER THIS
06:46:36PM CLASSIFICATION WILL BE RS-50, RS-60, NUTTI FAMILY 12, 15,
06:46:43PM 18.
06:46:44PM AS WELL AS THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BASED UPON ANY OF THOSE
06:46:47PM DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS.
06:46:49PM THANK YOU.
06:46:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:46:55PM PETITIONER.
06:46:55PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, CHARLIE THOMAS.
06:47:01PM WE ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS PROJECT.
06:47:05PM WE FIND IT CONSISTENT WITH PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:47:09PM I WANT TO BRING CLARITY TO CITY STAFF'S COMMENT.
06:47:12PM THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED MULTIFAMILY.
06:47:15PM SO IT WON'T INTRODUCE ANY MORE MULTIFAMILY BECAUSE IT IS A
06:47:18PM MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY.
06:47:19PM IT IS A TOWN HOUSE -- A DUPLEX CURRENTLY.
06:47:22PM IT WOULDN'T BE ADDING MULTIFAMILY INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD
06:47:25PM BECAUSE IT CURRENTLY EXISTS AS MULTIFAMILY.
06:47:29PM I ASK YOUR SUPPORT.
06:47:31PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THE ZONING IS RS-06, RESIDENTIAL FAMILY
06:47:45PM 60.
06:47:46PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: A MISUNDERSTANDING HERE TOO?
06:47:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PETITIONER?
06:47:53PM >> DUR RECENTLY A DUPLEX.
06:47:55PM IT IS MULTIFAMILY.
06:47:56PM WHEN YOU READ THEIR STATEMENT --
06:47:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THERE IS A DISTINCTION.
06:47:59PM WILL BENSON.
06:48:01PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: I AM NOT SPEAKING OF EXISTING USE.
06:48:05PM BUT IF THE EXISTING USE DOESN'T CON TO A RS-60 WHICH IS
06:48:11PM DUPLEX DOES NOT, IT IS NONCONFORMING TO ZONING.
06:48:15PM >> THEIR STATEMENT IS IT WILL INTRODUCE MULTIFAMILY IN THE
06:48:18PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:48:19PM THE BUILTI FAMILY HAVE EXISTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND
06:48:23PM ALREADY IS A PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:48:25PM PEOPLE ARE CURRENTLY LIVING THERE IN A MULTIFAMILY HOUSE.
06:48:28PM SO IT CAN'T INTRODUCE MULTIFAMILY INTO A PROPERTY THAT IS
06:48:32PM CURRENTLY MULTIFAMILY.
06:48:34PM IT IS CURRENTLY DO THAT.
06:48:37PM MAYBE THEY CHANGED THE WORD --
06:48:39PM >> ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 27, A DUPLEX IS NOT MULTIFAMILY.
06:48:43PM IT IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
06:48:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:48:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK: SO ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY, THERE IS
06:48:51PM CURRENTLY -- -- FOR MR. BENSON, CURRENTLY TWO RESIDENCES
06:48:58PM THEN.
06:48:58PM WHETHER SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED OR --
06:49:04PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
06:49:07PM STAFF.
06:49:07PM WE ARE GOING TO PULL UP -- WE WILL PULL UP A -- DO YOU HAVE
06:49:15PM A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT SITE?
06:49:17PM WE DID A FIELD VISIT, AND IT IS TWO RESIDENCES ATTACHED,
06:49:22PM YES.
06:49:22PM YOU CAN KIND OF SEE -- HARD TO TELL BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT
06:49:27PM TO WALK ON TO THE PROPERTY BUT TWO DOORS THERE.
06:49:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK: MY QUESTION IS, THAT CURRENTLY AS IT STANDS
06:49:34PM NOW, YOU COULD PUT FIVE DWELLINGS ON THE SITE.
06:49:38PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: IN THE RESIDENTIAL-10, YES.
06:49:41PM BECAUSE IT IS A HALF ACRE.
06:49:42PM SO THOSE -- BUT THE RESIDENTIAL-10 ONLY PERMITS
06:49:47PM SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED ON THE PERIPHERY OF NEIGHBORHOODS
06:49:51PM THROUGH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING.
06:49:52PM SO IT WOULDN'T BE BY RIGHT.
06:49:54PM BUT THERE IS POTENTIAL IF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF THINKS
06:49:58PM IT IS APPROPRIATE TO FIND THAT REQUEST D -- WE WOULD HAVE TO
06:50:02PM REVIEW IT AND IT WOULD COME BEFORE YOU AS A ZONING.
06:50:04PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IN THEORY WHAT IT IS DOING IS FIVE AND COULD
06:50:09PM POSSIBLY BE TEN.
06:50:11PM THANK YOU.
06:50:11PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANKS.
06:50:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:50:17PM PETITIONER.
06:50:21PM >> YES, SIR.
06:50:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: DID YOU WANT TO FINISH.
06:50:25PM >> YES, SIR.
06:50:25PM SO WE HAVE DONE WHAT THE CITY HAS ASKED.
06:50:28PM WE GO FIND UNUTILIZED PIECES OF PROPERTY, ADD ADDITIONAL
06:50:34PM HOUSING THAT IS ON THE TRANSIT LINE THAT ALLOWS FOR
06:50:37PM INCREASED DENSITY TO PROVIDE HOUSING.
06:50:40PM THAT IS WHAT WE DO.
06:50:41PM WE WORK WITH STAFF.
06:50:43PM WE FIND WHAT WORKS.
06:50:44PM IT IS ON -- IT IS NOT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:50:47PM ALL OF THE THINGS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SAID, THE
06:50:51PM THINGS THAT CITY STAFF AND I TALKED WITH STAFF.
06:50:54PM AND MY ONLY ISSUE THEY SAY INTRODUCE.
06:50:57PM IF THEY SAY EXISTING, I WOULD BE FINE WITH THE LANGUAGE, BUT
06:51:00PM WE BELIEVE THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND THE INTENT
06:51:03PM OF WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO SUPPORT HOUSING IN THE AREA AND IN
06:51:06PM OUR CITY.
06:51:07PM AND WE SUPPORT -- WE REQUEST YOUR SUPPORT.
06:51:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
06:51:14PM IS THERE -- COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:51:16PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS POINT OF
06:51:25PM INTERPRETATION OR POINT OF NOT CLARITY FOR STAFF WITH THE
06:51:31PM PETITIONER.
06:51:32PM AND THAT IS WHAT I AM HEARING TODAY.
06:51:35PM IT DOESN'T SEEM CLEAR THAT THE PETITIONER IS SAYING THAT
06:51:38PM STAFF IS TELLING HIM ONE THING.
06:51:41PM BUT STAFF IS SAYING ANOTHER.
06:51:42PM SO, TO ME, I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS INTERPRETATION,
06:51:48PM COMPREHENSION OR WHAT HAVE YOU, BUT THERE IS SOME KIND OF
06:51:52PM DISCONNECT HERE.
06:51:53PM AND I SEE IT SHALL -- YOU KNOW I AM LOOKING AT MY SHEET AND
06:51:57PM I SEE THREE OF THESE THINGS COMING BACK TO BACK.
06:51:59PM I AM SEEING A PATTERN THAT THAT WE ARE GOING DOWN THE WRONG
06:52:05PM ROAD HERE.
06:52:05PM SO I -- AND I AM NOT TELLING THE PETITIONER WHAT TO DO, BUT
06:52:10PM TO ME, I THINK THAT MAYBE THE PETITIONER NEEDS TO GO BACK
06:52:15PM FOR MORE CLARITY BEFORE WE DECIDE ON THESE OTHER ISSUES
06:52:20PM TONIGHT.
06:52:20PM I AM NOT TELLING ANYBODY WHAT TO DO, BUT I THINK THERE IS A
06:52:24PM POINT OF NOT UNDERSTANDING -- BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN KIND OF
06:52:28PM CONFUSING TO ME TONIGHT.
06:52:29PM SO I AM JUST SAYING -- I AM NOT TELLING THE PETITIONER WHAT
06:52:35PM TO DO, BUT I THINK THAT -- THERE IS A LACK OF COMMUNICATION
06:52:39PM AND UNDERSTANDING ON SOME PARTS THERE.
06:52:41PM AND I THINK THEY NEED TO BE CLEARED UP SO IS YOU ACTUALLY
06:52:44PM KNOW WHAT WE CAN DO AND WHAT YOU CAN'T AND UNDERSTAND WHAT
06:52:46PM STAFF IS TELLING YOU OR STAFF IS NOT GIVING YOU THE RIGHT
06:52:49PM DIRECTION, TO GET THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
06:52:51PM THOSE ARE JUST MY COMMENTS.
06:52:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. SHELBY.
06:52:55PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A QUESTION.
06:52:55PM I AM SORRY, IF YOU DON'T MIND.
06:52:57PM WHAT WAS STAFF -- DID STAFF HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THIS?
06:53:02PM I DIDN'T QUITE HEAR.
06:53:05PM >> OBJECTION FROM STAFF WAS LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION,
06:53:10PM THE OFFICE AND OBJECTION WHAT IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED ON THE
06:53:13PM SITE.
06:53:13PM WE DO NOT SAY -- THERE IS A NONCONFORM WILLING USE AND IT IS
06:53:17PM CONSISTENT, IT IS BASED UPON WHAT IS ADOPTED.
06:53:19PM EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY MAY NOT BE
06:53:22PM CONFORMING TO THE ZONING AND THE COMP PLAN, ABOUT WE HAVE TO
06:53:26PM LOOK AT THE COMP PLAN THAT WAS ACTED BY CITY COUNCIL AND
06:53:30PM WHAT THE CITY WANTS TO SEE MOVING FORWARD, NOT WHAT THE
06:53:34PM PROPERTY MIGHT CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR.
06:53:37PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN TO ADDRESS COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:53:40PM I WILL ASK YOU TO HARKEN BACK TO WHAT MISS JOHNSON-VELEZ
06:53:45PM SAID AND IN YOUR STAFF REPORT AS THE PURPOSE -- EXPLAINS WHY
06:53:49PM THIS IS LEGISLATIVE AND NOT QUASI-JUDICIAL AS THE COURTS
06:53:55PM HAVE FOUND IT.
06:53:55PM WHAT HIGH TEMPERATURE DOING IS MAKING POLICY DECISIONS OF
06:53:59PM WHAT YOU WANT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO LOOK LIKE.
06:54:02PM EVERY TIME YOU CHANGE YOUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE FUTURE
06:54:06PM CHANGES.
06:54:06PM SO THE QUESTION IS A POLICY QUESTION BASED ON YOUR
06:54:11PM DETERMINATION OF --
06:54:14PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT IS WHAT I AM SAYING, MR. SHELBY.
06:54:16PM I AM SEEING THIS BACK TO BACK TO BACK.
06:54:18PM AND I DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO COME TO US AND BE IT DEJECTED
06:54:23PM WHEN WE DON'T APPROVE SOMETHING OR APPROVE SOMETHING AND NOT
06:54:25PM HAVE CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHY SOMETHING MAY BE VOTED DOWN.
06:54:29PM AND THAT IS WHY I FEEL DISAPPOINTED.
06:54:31PM I DON'T THINK THE PETITIONER IS REALLY UNDERSTANDING -- AND
06:54:35PM NOW I AM GETTING A CLEAR STATEMENT THAT THE PLAN IS THE
06:54:38PM PLAN.
06:54:38PM WHICH THAT IS WHAT I BELIEVE.
06:54:40PM BUT I DON'T THINK THE PETITION DID HE IS BELIEVING THAT YOU
06:54:44PM ARE TELLING HIM ONE THING AND TELLING US ANOTHER.
06:54:47PM MAYBE THIS NEEDS TO GO BACK SO THE PETITIONER CAN UNDERSTAND
06:54:51PM WHAT REALLY NEEDS TO HAPPEN.
06:54:53PM I AM NOT SAYING HE KNOWS OR DOESN'T KNOW.
06:54:55PM I DON'T THINK FROM HEARING TONIGHT, A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF
06:54:58PM WHAT THE USAGE IS FOR OR WHAT THE PLAN IS INTENDED.
06:55:04PM AM I CONSISTENT, MR. BENSON.
06:55:07PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN GUDES, WE WOULD
06:55:10PM REQUEST A CONTINUANCE AND LET US HAVE TIME WITH STAFF AND
06:55:13PM MEET WITH YOU WITH A -- WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND A SITE
06:55:17PM PLAN AND BRING IT ALL TOGETHER.
06:55:19PM JUST A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
06:55:25PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU DON'T NEED A SITE PLAN.
06:55:27PM WHAT I AM SUGGEST SOMETHING THAT I SEE ONE, TWO, THREE.
06:55:31PM AND I DON'T BELIEVE YOU -- YOU ARE IN CONCERT WITH STAFF TO
06:55:35PM UNDERSTAND WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT YOU WANT
06:55:39PM CHANGED, UNDERSTANDING WHAT GOES THERE.
06:55:40PM AND WHAT -- WHAT THE CITY IS LOOKING TO BE THERE.
06:55:43PM >> I APPRECIATE THE GUIDANCE.
06:55:46PM AND I WILL REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, YES, SIR.
06:55:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM NOT TELLING WHAT YOU TO DO.
06:55:51PM >> NO, SIR.
06:55:51PM I APPRECIATE THAT.
06:55:52PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: BUT I WAS THINKING YOU MAY GO BACK FOR A
06:55:55PM LITTLE MORE CLARITY.
06:55:57PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
06:55:59PM DEPARTMENT.
06:55:59PM EITHER MISS MALONE OR MR. BENSON CAN CONFIRM THIS, BUT
06:56:05PM THE R-20 IS THE NEXT STEP UP IN LAND USE CATEGORY.
06:56:08PM NOTHING IN BETWEEN THERE TO BE A LESSER REQUEST IF THAT IS
06:56:11PM WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THE CONTINUANCE IS.
06:56:16PM RIGHT.
06:56:16PM SO --
06:56:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT IS NOT MY PURPOSE.
06:56:20PM THE PURPOSE IS -- WE ARE SAYING THIS IS OUR PLAN, OUR
06:56:23PM POLICY.
06:56:23PM I DON'T BELIEVE THE GENTLEMAN WHAT HE WANTS TO DO IS --
06:56:28PM GOING TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WHAT WE SAY WE WANT THERE.
06:56:33PM AND THAT IS WHY HE MAY NEED TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD
06:56:37PM WITH STAFF WHAT IS ALLOWED AND WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED FOR THE
06:56:41PM CITY FOR THAT ZONING USE RATHER THAN DENY HIM AGAIN AND
06:56:44PM AGAIN AND HE NOT HAVE A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT OUR PLAN
06:56:48PM IS.
06:56:48PM THAT IS ONLY MY RATIONALE.
06:56:51PM I AM JUST -- YOU KNOW, I CAN SEE WHERE THIS IS GOING.
06:56:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I ASK A QUESTION?
06:56:58PM IN THIS -- IN THIS SITUATION, YOU ARE BEING PRESENTED WITH
06:57:02PM FROM ONE CATEGORY TO THE NEXT CATEGORY.
06:57:05PM AND THE QUESTION IS, WHAT DO YOU ANTICIPATE A CONTINUANCE.
06:58:24PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T KNOW WHO THESE ARE BUT I MASHED
06:58:27PM THESE AS I SAW NUMBER TWO, THREE, FOUR AND FIVE.
06:58:31PM FOUR OF THEM THAT ALL GO FROM R-10 TO REALLY -- ONE SAID 35
06:58:36PM AND ONE 20.
06:58:37PM THEY SAY R-10 TO R-20 IN ESSENCE AND REALLY NO LEEWAY.
06:58:45PM OR 10 AND 20.
06:58:47PM NOT 15 AND 20 BUT 10 AND 20 AND THAT'S IT.
06:58:51PM THAT IS WHERE THE CLARITY COMES IN.
06:58:54PM A DUPLEX TWO HOUSES.
06:58:56PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION
06:58:58PM STAFF.
06:58:58PM THAT'S CORRECT.
06:58:59PM THERE IS NO NEXT -- THE CATEGORY IS R-10.
06:59:02PM THE NEXT CATEGORY IS R-20.
06:59:05PM THE APPLICANT CAN'T ASK FOG ANYTHING IN BETWEEN BECAUSE IT
06:59:08PM DOESN'T EXIST.
06:59:09PM PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS CONSISTENT AND THE PLANNING
06:59:14PM COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
06:59:14PM THE CONSISTENCY ON THE RECORD FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:59:17PM THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF ALWAYS REVIEW THESE AND PROVIDE
06:59:22PM COMMENTS AND OBJECTIONS BUT THE OFFICIAL RECOMMENDATION FROM
06:59:24PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS CONSISTENCY FOR THE
06:59:27PM RESIDENTIAL-20.
06:59:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: PETITIONER, AT THIS POINT, WHAT DO YOU WISH
06:59:41PM TO DO?
06:59:42PM DO YOU WISH FOR THIS HEARING TO BE CONTINUED OR ASKING FOR A
06:59:45PM CONTINUANCE?
06:59:48PM >> GIVE ME ONE SECOND.
06:59:50PM >> WE WOULD ASK FOR THE BOARD TO VOTE ON IT.
06:59:57PM AND WE BELIEVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS SPOKEN TO
07:00:00PM WHAT THE INTENT IS FOR THE CITY.
07:00:03PM WHAT THE CITY HAS TOLD -- INSTRUCTED THE PLANNING COMMISSION
07:00:05PM TO DO AND SAY, HEY, DO YOU FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE
07:00:09PM GROWTH PATTERNS, WITH THE HOUSING NEEDS AND THOSE THINGS TO
07:00:12PM BE ADDRESSED AND I THINK THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS SAID
07:00:14PM YES TO THAT.
07:00:15PM UNLIKE THE PREVIOUS CASE, THERE IS NO NEIGHBORHOOD OBJECTION
07:00:19PM OR ANY OF THIS AND MEETS THE NEED WHAT THE CITY SAYS THEY
07:00:22PM WANT AND COMPREHENSIVE.
07:00:23PM THE CITY'S OBJECTION IS MORE ZONING-RELATED TO THAT
07:00:31PM TECHNICAL BECAUSE IT SAYS THIS USE PREDATES THE ZONING.
07:00:34PM SO, YES, WE DON'T THINK DUPLEXES ARE APPROPRIATE EXCEPT IT
07:00:38PM IS A DUPLEX THERE AND A MIX OF THAT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:00:41PM THAT IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:00:41PM THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS A TRANSIENT NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:00:43PM IF YOU LOOK TO THE WEST, A MOBILE HOME PARK, CMU-35 THERE.
07:00:49PM I BELIEVE THERE IS A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY IN THERE.
07:00:53PM WE BELIEVE IT IS CONSISTENT AND BELIEVE IT IS CONSISTENT
07:00:55PM WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT WE ARE IN LINE WITH THE GOALS
07:00:58PM THAT YOU SET FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA THAT THEY HAVE COME BACK
07:01:01PM IN THE REPORT TO SAY YES AND THAT IS WHY THE BOARD
07:01:04PM UNANIMOUSLY VOTED FOR IT.
07:01:05PM THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
07:01:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:01:09PM ANYONE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO ANSWERING
07:01:13PM ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-17?
07:01:17PM I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE.
07:01:19PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE HURTAK.
07:01:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
07:01:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:01:27PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: BOARD MEMBERS, FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
07:01:43PM AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHEND SAVE PLAN FUTURE
07:01:49PM LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM 701 EAST LINE PAW
07:01:55PM FROM RESIDENTIAL-10, TO RESIDENTIAL-20, PROVIDING FOR
07:01:59PM SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:02:02PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
07:02:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:02:05PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:02:08PM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK?
07:02:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM GOING TO DENY THIS ONE BECAUSE ALL
07:02:14PM AROUND IT IS R-10.
07:02:15PM EVERYTHING AROUND IT.
07:02:16PM RIGHT NOW THEY CAN BUILD FIVE TOWN HOMES AND THAT -- FOR
07:02:20PM WHAT THE LAND USE IS RIGHT NOW IS PERFECTLY APPROPRIATE.
07:02:24PM I THINK PUTTING 10 WOULD DRASTICALLY CHANGE THE
07:02:28PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:02:28PM AND, YES, WE NEED MORE DENSITY AND WE NEED TO DO IT SMARTLY
07:02:33PM AND IN AREAS AND IN WAYS WHICH FIT WITH THE -- WITH THE
07:02:38PM NEIGHBORHOOD AND MOVING SLOWLY TOWARD WHAT WE WANT TO SEE.
07:02:41PM ADDING FIVE HOMES HERE WOULD BE GREAT.
07:02:45PM I THINK THAT WOULD BE ADDING THE DENSITY BUT TEN IS QUITE
07:02:53PM HONESTLY TOO MUCH FOR THIS AREA IN MY OPINION, SO I WILL BE
07:02:57PM VOTING NO.
07:02:58PM ANY FURTHER.
07:03:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:03:05PM >>LUIS VIERA: NO.
07:03:05PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:03:06PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.
07:03:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK: NO.
07:03:10PM >>BILL CARLSON: NO.
07:03:13PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I READ THE MOTION SO I HAVE TO SAY YES.
07:03:23PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT'S CORRECT.
07:03:25PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: I WILL SAY YES.
07:03:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO.
07:03:33PM >> THE MOTION DID NOT PASS.
07:03:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: IN A QUASI-JUDICIAL -- FOR THE SAKE OF THE
07:03:44PM RECORD MAKE A MOTION TO DENY, YES, PLEASE.
07:03:46PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. CHAIRMAN.
07:03:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:03:51PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I MOVE TO DENY FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-17 AND
07:03:57PM THIS IS THE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040
07:04:00PM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND
07:04:07PM USE MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL R-10 TO R-10 RESIDENTIAL-20, APPEAL
07:04:11PM OF ALL ORDINANCES AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE
07:04:16PM DATE --
07:04:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU DON'T DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT.
07:04:22PM JUST A MOTION TO DENY.
07:04:24PM >>LYNN HURTAK: SECOND.
07:04:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:04:27PM SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:04:29PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:04:31PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:04:32PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:04:38PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:04:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
07:04:42PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
07:04:45PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
07:04:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:04:48PM >>CLERK: OKAY, MOTION PASSED.
07:04:51PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: STATE THE VOTE PLEASE.
07:04:55PM SOMEBODY WAS ABSENT.
07:04:58PM >>CLERK: GUDES WAS ABSENT AT VOTE.
07:05:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU.
07:05:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:05:04PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-18.
07:05:08PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING
07:05:15PM COMMISSION STAFF.
07:05:15PM THIS IS 803 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
07:05:19PM PRIVATELY INITIATED SMALL SCALE.
07:05:22PM A HALF-ACRE SITE.
07:05:25PM THE REQUEST IS RESIDENTIAL-10 TO RESIDENTIAL 0.
07:05:27PM IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE EAST FOREST HILLS
07:05:31PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:05:31PM HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED AS YOU CAN SEE.
07:05:34PM IT IS ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
07:05:37PM WE HAVE N. BOULEVARD OVER HERE.
07:05:39PM NORTH OLA AVENUE.
07:05:42PM A CHURCH RIGHT HERE AND OTHER CHURCHES AND MULTIFAMILY USE
07:05:46PM DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
07:05:48PM AND TO THE NORTH IS THE DANNY DELI YO POOL.
07:05:51PM THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE 803 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
07:05:57PM WE ARE FACING WEST ALONG LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
07:06:00PM SUBJECT SITE WAS TO THE EAST OF THE PHOTOGRAPHER -- OR THE
07:06:04PM -- SORRY, IT IS ON THIS SIDE OF THE SCREEN.
07:06:07PM SO THIS IS FACING NORTH ALONG THE EASTERN BORDER OF THE
07:06:14PM SUBJECT SITE.
07:06:15PM KIND OF OVER HERE.
07:06:16PM FACING EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
07:06:21PM AND HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:06:25PM THIS CORRIDOR MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU BECAUSE THIS PARCEL
07:06:29PM RIGHT NEXT DOOR CAME IN FOR THE SAME REQUEST IN FRONT OF
07:06:33PM THIS COUNCIL FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 AND RESIDENTIAL TO 20.
07:06:36PM RESIDENTIAL-10 ON SUBJECT SITE AND RESIDENTIAL-10 HERE AND
07:06:41PM RESIDENTIAL-20 TO THE SOUTH.
07:06:42PM THIS IS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT RIGHT HERE AND THE DANNY
07:06:46PM DEL RIO POOL RIGHT HERE IS RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE THAT CAME
07:06:49PM AS PART OF THE -- ONE OF YOUR PARKS PLAN AMENDMENT IN THAT
07:06:55PM SERIES.
07:06:55PM HERE IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP ARE RECOGNIZING
07:07:01PM RESIDENTIAL-20 CONTINUING ALONG WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
07:07:03PM SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION -- OH, SO IS THE IMPACTS THAT WE
07:07:08PM GO FROM FIVE TO TEN DWELLING UNITS.
07:07:10PM THE AMOUNT OF NONRESIDENTIAL WILL INCREASE A LITTLE BIT BUT
07:07:13PM THE SITE WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA
07:07:17PM FOR ANY NONRESIDENTIAL USE BECAUSE IT IS A RESIDENTIAL LAND
07:07:20PM USE CATEGORY.
07:07:21PM IT IS VERY LIMITED IF YOU WANT TO DO SOME RESIDENTIAL.
07:07:24PM IT IS VERY CONTROLLED.
07:07:25PM THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN POLICIES THAT THE PLANNING
07:07:29PM COMMISSION FOUND THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE INFILL
07:07:32PM DEVELOPMENT.
07:07:33PM THE PLAN PROMOTES INFILL ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO
07:07:38PM PROVIDE HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND THE
07:07:42PM PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN WILL BE A SENSITIVE TRANSITION
07:07:44PM OF DENSITY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE NORTH, THE PLAN
07:07:49PM SUPPORTS PUTTING THAT DENSITY ALONG THE CORRIDORS AND WEST
07:07:53PM LINEBAUGH AVENUE IS A CORRIDOR.
07:07:55PM THAT DENSITY, YES.
07:07:56PM THE LOCATION OF MULTIFAMILY AREAS SUPPORT PLACING MORE WHERE
07:08:02PM THERE IS EXISTING.
07:08:02PM WE HAD THE RESIDENTIAL-20 NEXT DOOR AND ACROSS THE STREET
07:08:07PM AND THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
07:08:08PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP
07:08:12PM AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
07:08:15PM POLICIES OF THE PLAN.
07:08:16PM I DID NOT HAVE A SLIDE FOR CITY OF TAMPA STAFF COMMENTS
07:08:20PM BECAUSE THERE WAS NO OBJECTION TO THIS ONE FROM THE CITY OF
07:08:23PM TAMPA STAFF.
07:08:24PM STEPHEN BENSON IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT.
07:08:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS MALONE?
07:08:32PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANK YOU.
07:08:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BENSON?
07:08:38PM PETITIONER.
07:08:38PM >> GOOD EVENING, AGAIN.
07:08:40PM WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS.
07:08:43PM THIS PARCEL -- THE ADJACENT CARPEL WE CAME BEFORE THE BOARD
07:08:47PM PREVIOUSLY AND HAD IT CHANGED.
07:08:49PM WE ALSO CAME BEFORE THIS BURIED WITH THE PD PROJECT WITH THE
07:08:53PM EIGHT TOWN HOME UNITS WE ARE BUILDING OVER THERE.
07:08:56PM ABLE TO WORK OUT A DEAL WITH THE CHURCH AND ABLE TO ACQUIRE
07:08:59PM THE NEXT PIECE OF PROPERTY.
07:09:01PM WE WOULD LIKE YOUR SUPPORT TO CONTINUE ON DOING WHAT YOU
07:09:07PM FOUND CONSISTENT PREVIOUSLY AND CONSISTENT WHAT THE CITY IS
07:09:09PM LOOKING FOR IN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ARE THANK YOU.
07:09:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:09:13PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:09:15PM ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISH TO SPEAK AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
07:09:19PM FOUR, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-18?
07:09:21PM SEEING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
07:09:25PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:09:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
07:09:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:09:30PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:09:32PM ALL IN FAVOR.
07:09:33PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:09:35PM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:09:36PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU WILL CHAIRMAN, FILE NUMBER
07:09:40PM FOUR, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-18.
07:09:42PM ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
07:09:45PM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
07:09:51PM PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP, PROPERTY
07:09:56PM 80 3 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO
07:10:00PM RESIDENTIAL-20, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES,
07:10:03PM PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:10:08PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
07:10:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:10:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I WANT TO SAY THIS ONE FITS REALLY WELL
07:10:14PM BECAUSE HAS THE R-20 ALREADY NEXT DOOR AND NEXT TO IT.
07:10:18PM AND WE HAVE JUST CONTINUING.
07:10:19PM THIS IS WHERE WE SEE THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CHANGING.
07:10:23PM SO I WILL SUPPORT THIS.
07:10:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:10:28PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:10:30PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:10:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
07:10:32PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
07:10:34PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
07:10:36PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
07:10:38PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:10:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:10:41PM >>CLERK: MOTION CAR AUTOEYIED UNANIMOUS ME.
07:10:45PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 16,
07:10:49PM 2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
07:10:53PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR TONIGHT.
07:10:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:10:56PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE.
07:11:03PM FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-19.
07:11:07PM >>SAM THOMAS: GOOD EVENING, SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING
07:11:12PM COMMISSION STAFF.
07:11:13PM THIS IS FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-19, LOCATED 2302 AND 2304 N.
07:11:19PM BOULEVARD.
07:11:19PM SOME BACKGROUND ON THIS REQUEST.
07:11:21PM PRIVATELY INITIATED.
07:11:22PM SMALL SCALE IN SIZE.
07:11:24PM 0.3 ACRES AND TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE
07:11:29PM RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION.
07:11:31PM HERE IS THE SITE ON OUR GENERAL LOCATOR MAP IN THE CENTRAL
07:11:35PM TAMPA ZONING DISTRICT IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:11:38PM HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF SUBJECT SITE.
07:11:41PM YOU SEE SUBJECT SITE HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW AT THE
07:11:44PM INTERSECTION OF WEST PARK AVENUE AND N. BOULEVARD.
07:11:46PM ON THE EAST SIDE OF N. BOULEVARD, THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS
07:11:50PM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
07:11:52PM ON THE WEST SIDE -- THE EAST SIDE OF N. BOULEVARD, TALKING
07:11:56PM OF DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS TO A MIX OF MULTIFAMILY,
07:11:59PM SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
07:12:01PM AS WE GO NORTH TO THE INTERSECTION OF COLUMBUS DRIVE AND N.
07:12:05PM BOULEVARD, A MIX OF LIGHT COMMERCIAL USES AND SINGLE-FAMILY
07:12:10PM DETACHED UP THERE.
07:12:10PM AS YOU GO SOUTH OF ROSS AVENUE, THE HEIGHTS MIXED USE
07:12:16PM DEVELOPMENT AND YOU CAN SEE THE COMPLEX IN THE CORNER AND
07:12:18PM FARTHER OVER TO THE WEST, YOU CAN SEE THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER
07:12:21PM IN THE CORNER.
07:12:22PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ALONG N. BOULEVARD.
07:12:25PM SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE FRAME.
07:12:28PM THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON N. BOULEVARD AND THE SUBJECT IS ON
07:12:34PM THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE FRAME.
07:12:36PM THIS IS LOOKING NORTH FROM WEST PARK AVENUE AT THE SUBJECT
07:12:39PM SITE.
07:12:39PM AND THIS IS LOOKING WEST AT THE SUBJECT SITE FROM N.
07:12:46PM BOULEVARD.
07:12:46PM HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:12:52PM YOU CAN SEE THIS RECOGNIZING THE RESIDENTIAL-10.
07:12:55PM RESIDENTIAL-10 IS DOMINANT IN THE RICHLAND PARK
07:12:58PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:12:59PM WHEN YOU GO SOUTH, R-35.
07:13:01PM AND YOU CROSS TO THE EAST, YOU CAN SEE IT IS ALL RECOGNIZED
07:13:05PM UNDER THE R-35.
07:13:06PM SOUTH OF PALM AVENUE, THE RMU-100 AND THE LIGHT COMMERCIAL
07:13:12PM USES COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
07:13:14PM I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THIS SITE AT THE CORNER OF N.
07:13:18PM BOULEVARD AND WEST CORPUS CHRISTI THAT CAME BEFORE YOU NOT
07:13:20PM TOO LONG AGO, TA/CPA 22-11.
07:13:27PM THATCH CHANGE THE TWO SOUTHERN PARCELS TO RESIDENTIAL-35.
07:13:31PM HERE IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:13:36PM YOU CAN SEE THE SITE RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-20.
07:13:40PM I ALSO WANT TO MENTION THIS CAME IN -- THIS ACTUALLY DID
07:13:43PM COME FOR A PLAN IN 2021 TO MOVE THE SKEET TO R-20 AS WELL.
07:13:50PM THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THIS REQUEST OF THE R-10,
07:13:55PM CONSIDERED FOR THREE UNITS AND RESIDENTIAL-20, CONSIDERED
07:13:58PM FOR SIX UNITS.
07:13:59PM THERE IS A POSSIBILITY TO DO NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
07:14:03PM SITE, BUT THEY HAVE TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND OTHER
07:14:10PM RESTRICTIONS.
07:14:10PM AND REDUCES THE POSSIBILITY OF R-12, 16, 18 AND THE RO-1
07:14:18PM ZONING.
07:14:19PM THE CITY STAFF DID HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST, AND I
07:14:23PM WILL LET THEM SPEAK ON THAT.
07:14:25PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH MULTIPLE
07:14:27PM OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND USE
07:14:31PM LAND SOURCES EFFICIENTLY TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S
07:14:37PM GROWING POPULATION AND THE COMPACT CITY STRATEGY THAT
07:14:42PM ENCOURAGES INFILL WITH TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES.
07:14:46PM BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
07:14:49PM RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE CONSISTENT
07:14:51PM WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
07:14:54PM I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:14:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
07:15:06PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING.
07:15:08PM THIS OBJECTION DEVELOPED FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
07:15:12PM THE EXPLANATION THAT THE R-20 WILL DOUBLE THE ALLOWABLE
07:15:17PM DENSITY ON THE SITE AND ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY USES WITHIN A
07:15:21PM SINGLE-FAMILY AREA.
07:15:22PM THE POTENTIAL MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL BOO WOULD BE SIX
07:15:26PM UNITS AND LIKELY COME BEFORE YOU AS A PD.
07:15:29PM AT THAT POINT THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THE SIX UNITS
07:15:33PM BECAUSE YOU WOULD APPROVE IT TODAY.
07:15:35PM THAT IS WHAT STAFF'S OBJECTION WAS BASED ON.
07:15:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:15:40PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IF WE COULD GET THE MAP -- THE COLORED -- IT
07:15:46PM DOESN'T MATTER WHICH ONE.
07:15:47PM THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, BECAUSE I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR.
07:15:52PM BENSON.
07:15:53PM WHILE WE DO OFTEN SEE THAT CHANGING A RESIDENTIAL -- OKAY,
07:16:13PM LET'S JUST START OVER.
07:16:15PM SO WE HAVE R-35 ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET AND R-10 ON THE
07:16:20PM OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET.
07:16:21PM WOULDN'T R-20 BE A GOOD BUFFER BETWEEN THOSE TWO ESPECIALLY
07:16:26PM ON A MAJOR CORRIDOR LIKE N. BOULEVARD?
07:16:31PM >> POLICIES THAT YOU CAN CITE THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN
07:16:33PM SUPPORTED THAT SUPPORT THAT TERMINATION.
07:16:37PM HOWEVER IF THAT IS THE CASE EVERYTHING ON N. BOULEVARD ON
07:16:40PM THE WEST SIDE WOULD BE R-20.
07:16:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY, THANK YOU.
07:16:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. BENSON, FOLLOWING THAT LINE AND THINKING
07:16:50PM OF A TRANSITION, WHEN WAS THE RIGHT SIDE -- HOW LONG HAS
07:16:56PM THAT OPINION DESIGNATED THAT?
07:16:58PM HAS THAT BEEN CHANGED OVER IN THE LAST TEN YEARS, 20 YEARS?
07:17:06PM THE EAST SIDE OF BOULEVARD.
07:17:07PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE PLANNING COMMISSION
07:17:14PM STAFF.
07:17:14PM I WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT THE OLD MAPS.
07:17:16PM HARD TO SAY.
07:17:18PM PART OF THE REASON IT IS SO DIFFERENT BECAUSE THE EAST SIDE
07:17:20PM OF N. BOULEVARD IS THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE, SO THE
07:17:24PM PLAN CREATES GROWTH FOR THE URBAN VILLAGES.
07:17:27PM A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND THE WEST
07:17:30PM SIDE OF N. BOULEVARD IS NOT PART OF THE URBAN VILLAGE.
07:17:35PM I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHEN THE PLANNERS WERE DRAWING THE MAP A
07:17:39PM LONG TIME AGO, THAT IS PROBABLY WHY THEY PLACED SUCH A
07:17:43PM HIGHER DENSITY ACROSS THE STREET.
07:17:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I MUST ASK WHEN YOU SAY A LONG TEAM AGO --
07:17:48PM WERE YOU BORN BEFORE THAT TIME?
07:17:52PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I PLEAD THE FIFTH.
07:17:54PM BUT THE FIRST LAND USE MAP WAS 1989 TEAM FRAME.
07:17:57PM SO --
07:17:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THAT LONG AGO.
07:18:00PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: I CAN'T SAY DEFINITIVELY IF ALWAYS R-35.
07:18:04PM I LOOKED AT A LOT OF THESE OVER THE YEARS, IF NOT A BIG PLAN
07:18:09PM AMENDMENT, IT -- YEAH.
07:18:10PM IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THAT WAY.
07:18:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I HAVEN'T HEARD THE PETITIONER -- I AM NOT
07:18:16PM MAKING JUDGMENTS, BUT AT SOME POINT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO
07:18:21PM TAKE A STEP DOWN BEFORE GOING INTO A RELATION NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:18:26PM STUFF SAID FOR ME.
07:18:27PM THANK YOU.
07:18:28PM >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANK YOU.
07:18:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
07:18:31PM THANK YOU.
07:18:31PM PETITIONER.
07:18:32PM >> ADD HE THINKS EVENING.
07:18:38PM I'M ANGELA HALBER WITH HILL, WARD HENDERSON 101 E. KENNEDY
07:18:44PM BOULEVARD AND I'M HERE FOR PETITION PETITION, PROFESSIONAL
07:18:46PM REID GROUP.
07:18:47PM ACTUALLY YOU CAN LEAVE THAT UP THERE BECAUSE -- THIS MAP IS
07:18:50PM PRETTY MUCH ILLUSTRATES WHY WE ARE HERE TONIGHT.
07:18:54PM THIS -- THERE IS NO TRANSITION CURRENTLY BETWEEN THE R-35
07:19:02PM AND THE R-10.
07:19:04PM AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS R-15.
07:19:09PM THE APPLICANT IS HOPING TO DO FOUR UNITS.
07:19:14PM AND ACTUALLY HAS A PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IN FOR
07:19:19PM REZONING THAT IS A COMPANION -- OF COURSE ALL DEPENDENT ON
07:19:23PM THIS BEING APPROVED.
07:19:24PM CURRENTLY THERE ARE THREE -- THEY CAN GET THREE UNITS ON
07:19:28PM THIS.
07:19:28PM AND THEY WANT FOUR.
07:19:29PM SO, AGAIN, THIS IS -- THE OTHER PART OF THIS IS THAT ALL OF
07:19:34PM THESE LOTS CURRENTLY FRONT ON N. BOULEVARD WHICH IS AN
07:19:38PM ARTERIAL.
07:19:38PM AND THEY ARE -- THE SITE TO THE SOUTH IS COMPLETELY VACANT.
07:19:43PM THE LOT TO THE NORTH IS -- IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
07:19:47PM THERE IS A STRUCTURE THERE, BUT NEEDS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND
07:19:51PM WE HAVE AN APPLICATION PENDING REVIEW FOR THAT SO, AGAIN, WE
07:19:58PM HAVE GOT THE PROPOSAL TO DO R-20.
07:20:01PM AND CREATE THAT BUFFER BETWEEN -- THE SENSITIVE TRANSITION.
07:20:07PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTAINS THE POLL SEEING THAT SUPPORT
07:20:11PM THIS.
07:20:11PM THIS IS A GENTLE JUDGE THAT INCREASES THE DENSITY BETWEEN OF
07:20:16PM TWO AREAS WHICH IS CONSISTENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
07:20:20PM ALSO MAINTAINS THE STABILITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE
07:20:25PM EAST.
07:20:25PM AND THAT IS PRETTY MUCH WHY WE ARE HERE.
07:20:27PM IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
07:20:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:20:36PM IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBER WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
07:20:40PM NUMBER FIVE, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-19?
07:20:43PM SEEING NONE.
07:20:43PM DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
07:20:47PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:20:48PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND.
07:20:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
07:20:52PM MANISCALCO.
07:20:53PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:20:55PM ALL IN FAVOR.
07:20:56PM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:21:00PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST HAD ONE.
07:21:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:21:06PM >>BILL CARLSON: LIKE TO MOVE FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-19,
07:21:10PM ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
07:21:13PM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE
07:21:19PM LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AT 2302 AND 2304 N.
07:21:26PM BOULEVARD FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES, PROVIDING FOR
07:21:30PM SEVERABILITY.
07:21:31PM PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:21:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:21:37PM APPEAR AND SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:21:39PM >>LYNN HURTAK: SINCE WE ARE HAVING DISCUSSION TONIGHT --
07:21:44PM MAYBE I AM THE ONLY ONE, BUT I REALLY DO THINK THAT THE --
07:21:47PM THAT THAT STEP IS APPROPRIATE AND PROBABLY NEEDED ALONG
07:21:53PM NORTH BOULEVARD.
07:21:54PM I THINK THIS HELPS BRING THAT ALONG.
07:21:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY, COUNCIL, I COULDN'T AGREE WITH YOU
07:22:01PM MORE.
07:22:01PM THIS IS ONE OF THOSE AREAS WHERE A TRANSITION IS GOING TO BE
07:22:04PM NEEDED.
07:22:05PM IT WOULDN'T BE HIGHER DENSITY AND THEN SINGLE-FAMILY.
07:22:11PM IT WOULD GENTLY EASE IN AND I AGREE WITH YOU.
07:22:14PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:22:15PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT GOING TO BE SUPPORTED.
07:22:18PM I LOOKED AT THIS AND I KNOW IT IS NEEDED BUT -- BUT JUST MY
07:22:22PM FEELING.
07:22:22PM DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.
07:22:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:22:27PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:22:27PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO.
07:22:30PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
07:22:33PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
07:22:35PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO.
07:22:35PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:22:40PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO.
07:22:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:22:43PM >>CLERK: MOTION PASSED WITH MIRANDA, GUDES, MANISCALCO
07:22:50PM VOTING NO.
07:22:51PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY
07:22:57PM 16, 2023 AT 9:30 A.M. A.M. --
07:23:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: LET'S HAVE A -- -- CAN I JUST GO BACK.
07:23:08PM COUNCILMAN VIERA, WHAT WAS YOUR VOTE?
07:23:11PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:23:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: IT WAS A YES?
07:23:16PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
07:23:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I MISSED THAT ONE.
07:23:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WANT TO MAKE SURE.
07:23:21PM PLEASE CONTINUE MADAM CLERK.
07:23:23PM >> SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 16,
07:23:28PM 2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
07:23:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU.
07:23:32PM AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.
07:23:36PM FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-22.
07:23:40PM >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
07:23:57PM THIS IS FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-22 LOCATED 101 WEST AMELIA
07:23:57PM AVENUE, 2500 AND 2510 NORTH TAMPA STREET AND 106, 108, 110
07:24:08PM AND 114 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
07:24:08PM THIS IS PRIVATELY INITIATED, SMALL KALE.
07:24:17PM APPROXIMATELY 1.38 ANGERS AND THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM
07:24:21PM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO URBAN
07:24:28PM MIXED USE-60.
07:24:28PM THIS IS THE GENERAL LOCATION MAP.
07:24:32PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS DO YOU KNOW HERE.
07:24:35PM IT IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, TAMPA HEIGHTS
07:24:41PM NEIGHBORHOOD.
07:24:42PM THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE SITE.
07:24:46PM YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IN RED.
07:24:50PM IT FRONTS WEST COLUMBUS AVENUE AND BOUND BY NORTH HIGHLAND
07:24:55PM AVENUE AND NORTH TAMPA STREET AND THE AREA AROUND THE SITE
07:24:59PM HAVE COMMERCIAL USES AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
07:25:01PM THIS IS FACING SOUTH ON NORTH TAMPA STREET LOOKING AT THE
07:25:06PM SUBJECT SITE.
07:25:07PM THIS IS FACING NORTH ON NORTH -- ON NORTH TAMPA STREET.
07:25:14PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT.
07:25:16PM THIS IS FACING WEST ON WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
07:25:21PM SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO ON THE LEFT.
07:25:23PM THIS IS FACING EAST ON WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
07:25:28PM THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE RIGHT.
07:25:30PM THIS IS FACING EAST ON WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE AND THE SUBJECT
07:25:36PM SITE IS ON THE RIGHT.
07:25:37PM AND FACING NORTH ON HIGHLAND AVENUE AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS
07:25:44PM TO THE RIGHT.
07:25:45PM THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:25:48PM YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED HERE IN BLACK.
07:25:51PM THE RED IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35.
07:25:54PM AND THE PINK IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
07:25:57PM YOU CAN SEE ALONG COLUMBUS, YOU CAN SEE THE TRANSITIONS
07:26:02PM BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND THE CMU-35 AS WELL
07:26:07PM AND FURTHER TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE THE RESIDENTIAL
07:26:10PM DESIGNATIONS.
07:26:11PM OF THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
07:26:15PM SUBJECT SITE A ALIGNED HERE.
07:26:18PM HARD TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COLORS BUT IT IS THE
07:26:22PM URBAN MIXED USE-60.
07:26:23PM EXISTING IMPACTS OF THE SITE.
07:26:28PM IT CAN CURRENTLY HAVE 47 DWELLING UNITS ON IT AND
07:26:33PM WITH UMU-06 DESIGNATION ALLOW 82 DWELLING UNITS AND THE
07:26:37PM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE RESIDENTIAL AND OR NONRESIDENTIAL USES
07:26:40PM WILL ALSO BE INCREASED.
07:26:41PM THE URBAN MIXED USE-60 DES EGG NATION WILL EXPAND THE
07:26:46PM COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES OVER THE ENTIRE SITE.
07:26:49PM CURRENTLY THEY ARE ONLY ALLOWED IN THE CC-35 DESIGNATOIN TO
07:26:58PM THE SITE.
07:27:01PM THE CITY OF TAMPA HAD OBJECTIONS TO THIS.
07:27:04PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH MULTIPLE
07:27:07PM ASPECTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
07:27:09PM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAVE POLICY DIRECTION TO IDENTIFY THE
07:27:12PM NEED TO IDENTIFY LAND FOR HOUSING OBJECTS TO MEET THE NEED
07:27:16PM OF TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT
07:27:19PM OF MIXED AUTO US AREA THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE LOCAL EMPLOYMENT
07:27:23PM AND ENTERTAINMENT USES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES THE
07:27:28PM DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITH THE CITY OF FORM STRATEGY THAT
07:27:30PM ENCOURAGES MIXED USE INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PROXIMITY
07:27:34PM OF TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES.
07:27:36PM AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO SEEKS TO DIRECT THE GREATER
07:27:40PM SHARE OF GROWTH TO URBAN VILLAGES.
07:27:43PM THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPOSED MAP
07:27:47PM AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
07:27:52PM POLICIES OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
07:27:55PM THAT IS IS THE END OF MY PRESENTATION.
07:27:58PM I WILL BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
07:28:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
07:28:04PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: STEPHEN BENSON, CITY PLANNING.
07:28:07PM THIS OBJECTION CAME OUT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
07:28:10PM STAFF.
07:28:10PM AND THE RATIONALE THIS WOULD INTRODUCE THE COMMERCIAL
07:28:15PM INTENSIVE USES THAT DON'T CURRENTLY EXIST ALONG COLUMBUS
07:28:20PM DRIVE.
07:28:20PM THOSE COMMERCIAL USE -- ALLOWED USES THAT COULD BE ASKED
07:28:26PM FOR INCLUDE THE SAME LIST THAT WAS TALKED ABOUT IN THE PRIOR
07:28:28PM CASE.
07:28:28PM AUTO REPAIR AND AUTO SHOPS AND THOSE TYPE OF USES.
07:28:32PM ADDITIONALLY, WE WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT THERE IS A POLICY
07:28:36PM IN THE PLAN THAT ALLOWS YOU TO USE FLOOR AREA RATIO AND NOT
07:28:42PM DENSITY.
07:28:42PM WE HAVE SEEN SOME CASES COME BEFORE YOU HOW CAN THEY GET
07:28:46PM THAT AMOUNT OF DENSITY.
07:28:47PM MULTIPLY THE DENSITY WITH THE ACREAGE, A LOT LOWER.
07:28:52PM IN THE PLANNING DISTRICT DESIGNATED FOR GROWTH IN THE PLAN,
07:28:55PM FLOOR AREA RATIO WITH THE MIXED AUTO US CATEGORY.
07:29:01PM AND YOU CAN BUILD MORE UNITS WITH THE FLOOR AIR RATIO.
07:29:05PM BUILT IN THAT SOME PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT AND SOME DON'T KNOW
07:29:08PM ABOUT.
07:29:09PM USING 1,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH PASS CAYCES
07:29:13PM YOU CAN GET UP TO 195 DWELLING UNITS FOR 195,000 SQUARE FEET
07:29:18PM OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE.
07:29:19PM LAST THING I WANTED TO MENTION IS, THERE WAS A STUDY
07:29:25PM COMPLETED BY HART TIED TO THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT GOING UP AND
07:29:29PM DOWN FLORIDA AND TAMPA THAT STUDY RECOMMENDED -- AND
07:29:33PM IDENTIFIED THE NEED FOR HIGHER DENSITY ON THE CORRIDOR.
07:29:36PM THAT HAS BEEN OUT THERE IN THE COMMUNITY.
07:29:38PM IT CAME FROM FEEDBACK.
07:29:40PM THAT RECOMMENDATION IS NOT IMPLEMENTED IN THE PLAN AND WE
07:29:43PM WILL TRY TO IMPLEMENT IT AS PART OF THE PLAN UPDATE BUT THAT
07:29:46PM IS ALSO A RATIONALE BASIS TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT.
07:29:51PM I WANT TO OFFER THAT ON THE RECORD.
07:29:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:29:55PM >>LYNN HURTAK: CAN YOU CLARIFY THAT?
07:29:58PM WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THERE IS A THOUGHT TO ALREADY
07:30:00PM INCREASE THIS DENSITY?
07:30:04PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THAT WAS RELATED TO THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT
07:30:07PM FROM DOWNTOWN TO USF.
07:30:11PM THERE WOULD BE A STATION AS PART OF THAT COUNTRY AND THE
07:30:15PM RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE THE LAND USE.
07:30:17PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WHAT WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN TOO EV STEVE THIS
07:30:20PM IS THE NEXT BUMP-UP.
07:30:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK: TO UMU-60.
07:30:26PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: ALREADY AT CM U NOTHING IN BETWEEN.
07:30:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK: I THINK MY QUESTION IS WHY DON'T WE HAVE
07:30:35PM SOMETHING IN BETWEEN.
07:30:36PM IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE EITHER COMMUNITY ELIGIBLE OR COMMUNITY
07:30:41PM MIXED USE WHICH MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.
07:30:43PM TO ME IT IS RESIDENTIAL.
07:30:45PM IT IS RETAIL.
07:30:46PM IT IS ALL OF THAT STUFF, AND THEN YOU COME TO URBAN MIXED
07:30:51PM USE-60, WHICH CAN HAVE, LIKE, HEAVY-DUTY COMMERCIAL
07:30:55PM INTENSIVE USES.
07:30:57PM IF A AND THIS SO SUR SAYING REALLY NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN TO
07:31:02PM DO GET THAT DENSITY EXCEPT F.A.R.
07:31:08PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: WHICH IS AIR LOWED FOR MIXED USE.
07:31:11PM >>LYNN HURTAK: IN THEORY THEY CAN GET THE SAME THING WITH
07:31:14PM THE COMMUNITY MIXED AUTO US BY USING F.A.R.
07:31:18PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: NOT THE SAME DENSITY.
07:31:20PM CAP OUT AT 2.
07:31:22PM AND UMU IS 3.25.
07:31:25PM CORRECT.
07:31:27PM YEAH.
07:31:27PM >>LYNN HURTAK: WILL YOU REPEAT WHATEVER SHE SAID?
07:31:33PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE MIX USE.
07:31:36PM WEST TAMPA AND THE COMMUNITY DISTRICT.
07:31:39PM USE F.A.R. AND PUT ALL UNITS AND NO RETAIL -- I DON'T KNOW
07:31:43PM THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN BUT THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED.
07:31:46PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YOU ARE SAYING POSSIBLY WHEN WE ARE LOOKING
07:31:49PM AT THIS FUTURE PLANNING MAPS, THAT WE CAN FIND SOMETHING
07:31:52PM THAT MIGHT FIT THIS?
07:31:55PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: WE CAN LOOK AT THAT AS PART OF THE PLAN
07:31:58PM UPDATE.
07:31:59PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THERE IS SOMETHING THAT CAN LOOK AT THAT DOES
07:32:03PM NOT WILL YOU HEAVY INDUSTRIAL.
07:32:04PM >>STEPHEN BENSON: THERE IS NOT, BUT WE CAN LOOK AT IT.
07:32:08PM >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO KNOW.
07:32:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
07:32:12PM PETITIONER.
07:32:13PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, ALEC SCHALER.
07:32:38PM HERE WITH FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-22.
07:32:43PM I WILL KEEP IT BRIEF, INTERSECTION OF TAMPA AND COLUMBUS AND
07:32:48PM I WILL LOOK AT THE COUPLE OF SLIDES.
07:32:51PM THE REQUEST TO UMU-60.
07:32:54PM THOSE MAPS ARE SHOWN ON THE SCREEN AND A COMPARISON OF
07:32:58PM THE F.A.R. BRIEFLY MENTIONED BEFORE.
07:32:59PM BASELINE F.A.R. IS FOR CMU.
07:33:05PM BUMP THAT UP TO 6.5.
07:33:07PM AND BONUS FROM A 2 TO ALLOWABLE 3.25 ALLOWABLE F.A.R.
07:33:14PM A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THESE ROADWAYS, TAMPA STREET AND
07:33:18PM COLUMBUS DRIVE.
07:33:19PM THIS IS RELATIVELY OUR JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST 37.
07:33:22PM BOTH ARE ARTERIAL ROADWAYS AND THE SITE WILL BE FRONTING TWO
07:33:26PM ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS.
07:33:28PM WEST COLUMBUS IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS.
07:33:33PM THEY ARE SUITABLE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND HIGHER DENSITY USES
07:33:37PM THAN CURRENTLY THEY ARE TODAY.
07:33:39PM I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION THAT ONE OF THE FACTORS IN REVIEWING
07:33:41PM A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT IF IT IS LOCATED ON A TRANSIT EMPHASIS
07:33:48PM CORRIDOR THAT IS CONSISTENT FOR HIGHER DENSITY COMP PLAN
07:33:52PM AMENDMENTS.
07:33:53PM AND LOCATED IN THE URBAN VILLAGE AND A PLETHORA IN THE COMP
07:33:57PM PLAN REGARDING THE DIRECTION OF GROWTH TO THESE AREAS OF THE
07:34:00PM CITY.
07:34:00PM STAFF RECOMMENDED THIS APPLICATION -- OR FOUND THIS
07:34:05PM APPLICATION CONSISTENT.
07:34:06PM AND WE WENT BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 7 OF
07:34:09PM LAST YEAR AND RECEIVED A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION OF
07:34:12PM CONSISTENCY ON THIS APPLICATION.
07:34:14PM I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND I HAVE SUPPORT LETTERS THAT
07:34:17PM I DON'T THINK MADE IT INTO THE RECORD YET FROM THE YMCA AND
07:34:22PM A COUPLE OF OTHER PEOPLE.
07:34:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: GIVE THEM TO MR. SHELBY.
07:34:26PM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO AND
07:34:29PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:34:31PM MOTION PASSES.
07:34:32PM ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:34:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: GIVE US ONE SECOND TO TAKE A LOOK AT THESE,
07:34:54PM PLEASE.
07:34:55PM >> YES, SURE.
07:35:18PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIRMAN, THAT WHOLE AREA YOU ARE
07:35:21PM LOOKING AT ON -- ON COLUMBUS DRIVE, THAT IS ALL VACANT?
07:35:30PM IN THE CORNER?
07:35:31PM AND YOU HAVE THE OTHER HOUSE AT THE END?
07:35:35PM LOOKS LIKE A GHOST HOUSE BUT HAS BEEN THERE FOR 100 YEARS.
07:35:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
07:35:50PM SEEING NO QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER.
07:35:52PM LET'S GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
07:35:53PM ANYONE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO MAKE COMMENT TO AGENDA ITEM
07:35:58PM NUMBER ATE, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-23?
07:36:07PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LINE UP TO THE RIGHT OR LEFT.
07:36:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MANY.
07:36:11PM I SEE WE MIGHT HAVE TWO ON LINE.
07:36:14PM >>CLERK: GOOD EVENING, CHAIR.
07:36:15PM THE TWO THAT ARE REGISTERED ARE NOT ONLINE AT THIS TIME.
07:36:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:36:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:36:25PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:36:27PM ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
07:36:29PM WHO DO WE HAVE HERE.
07:36:30PM IS IT COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:36:32PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
07:36:44PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED AMENDING IMAGINE
07:36:48PM 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND
07:36:53PM FEW THURSDAY LAND USE AT 101 WEST AMELIA AVENUE, 2500 AND
07:36:53PM 2510 NORTH TAMPA STREET AND 106, 108, 110 AND 114 WEST
07:37:03PM COLUMBUS DRIVE FROM THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 CC-35 AND
07:37:07PM COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO URBAN MIXED USE-60, UMU-60 PRO
07:37:13PM PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR
07:37:16PM SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:37:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:37:21PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:37:22PM ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:37:24PM ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:37:25PM >>LYNN HURTAK: YES.
07:37:26PM >>BILL CARLSON: YES.
07:37:27PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES.
07:37:30PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES.
07:37:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES.
07:37:33PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES.
07:37:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES.
07:37:36PM >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
07:37:39PM SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD FEBRUARY 16, 2023
07:37:44PM AT 9:30 A.M.
07:37:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: INFORMATION REPORTS.
07:37:52PM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:37:53PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NONE SIR.
07:37:55PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: NONE.
07:37:56PM >>LYNN HURTAK: NONE.
07:37:58PM >>BILL CARLSON: NONE.
07:37:59PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, FIRST A -- THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT.
07:38:02PM A HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY TO COUNCILMEMBER VIERA.
07:38:06PM >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU.
07:38:08PM >>LYNN HURTAK: HAPPY BIRTHDAY.
07:38:10PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND NEIL DIAMOND AS WELL.
07:38:15PM I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE THE OTHER BIRTHDAY.
07:38:17PM A MOTION, A REQUEST FROM PLANNING COMMISSION IN COORDINATION
07:38:20PM WITH THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT -- WHAT, YOU DON'T LIKE
07:38:23PM THAT?
07:38:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I JUST FIND IT FUNNY.
07:38:26PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SAW NEIL DIAMOND TWICE IN TAMPA.
07:38:30PM ONE OF THE BEST SHOWS I HAVE EVER SEEN.
07:38:32PM IN COORDINATION WITH THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO
07:38:35PM APPEAR AND PRESENT BEFORE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 23, 2023 AT
07:38:40PM 9 A.M. TO PRESENT AN UPDATE ON THE FUTURE LAND USE
07:38:45PM ASSESSMENT WITH PRICHARD STEINBECK GROUP.
07:38:49PM >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND.
07:38:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
07:38:54PM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
07:38:56PM >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR.
07:38:57PM JUST REALLY QUICK, IF I MAY.
07:38:59PM I MENTIONED BEFORE REGARDING THE VETERANS PARKS, AND I AM
07:39:03PM GLAD THAT THE CITY IS GOING FORWARD WITH THAT.
07:39:05PM I WANTED TO GET AN UPDATE ON THAT.
07:39:08PM WHAT IS THE FURTHEST OUT I CAN SCHEDULE?
07:39:18PM >>BILL CARLSON: MARTY SAID WHENEVER YOU WANT.
07:39:20PM >>LUIS VIERA: I WILL DO IT IN THE FIRST -- FIRST WEEK OF
07:39:24PM OCTOBER OF -- WHAT ARE WE IN, 2023 -- JUST ON THE STATUS
07:39:30PM OF THE VETERAN PARKS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA -- MEMORIALS
07:39:33PM THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMPA IF I MAY.
07:39:36PM >>MARTIN SHELBY: OCTOBER 5 UNDER STAFF REPORTS.
07:39:39PM >>LUIS VIERA: MOTION.
07:39:43PM >>BILL CARLSON: SECOND.
07:39:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: ALL IN FAVOR.
07:39:45PM >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND, IF I MAY.
07:39:49PM ANGELA, AS SOME OF YOU MAY KNOW, IS THE NICE YOUNG WOMAN THAT
07:39:53PM LED UP THE -- THE MEMORIAL FOR THE COLLEGE HILL CEMETERY.
07:39:57PM I WANTED TO GIVE HER A CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION AT OUR
07:40:01PM APRIL 2023 COMMENDATION MEETING, IF I MAY.
07:40:04PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND.
07:40:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
07:40:09PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:40:11PM >>LUIS VIERA: THAT'S IT.
07:40:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: I MOVE THAT WE REQUEST A FIVE-MINUTE
07:40:18PM PRESENTATION OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF
07:40:20PM THEIR ON-BOARD TAMPA BAY AT THEIR FEBRUARY 16 REGULAR
07:40:23PM SESSION AT 9 A.M.
07:40:25PM PRESENTATIONS AND CEREMONIES.
07:40:27PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM THE CHAIRMAN.
07:40:30PM SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
07:40:31PM ALL IN FAVOR.
07:40:32PM ANY OPPOSED?
07:40:35PM MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
07:40:36PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED.
07:40:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCILMAN
07:40:41PM MANISCALCO.
07:40:41PM SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:40:43PM WITHOUT EXCEPTION, WE ARE ADJOURNED.
DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.