TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2023
5:01 P.M.

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.


05:04:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AS I WAS SAYING EARLIER, TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
EVENING SESSION FOR THE FEBRUARY 9, 2023 MEETING IS NOW IN
SESSION.
ROLL CALL.
05:04:14PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
05:04:20PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
05:04:23PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
05:04:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HERE.
05:04:25PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:04:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MR. SHELBY.
05:04:30PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES, VERY BRIEFLY, MR. CITRO AND TO WAIVE
THE CONTINUED USE OF CMT.
05:04:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES.
05:04:48PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE ITEM 2-10.
05:04:52PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
05:04:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE HAD A COMMENDATION PRESENTATION;
HOWEVER, THE PEOPLE THAT THE PRESENTATION WAS GOING TO BE
GIVEN TO -- THE COMMENDATION WAS GOING TO BE GIVEN TO WAS
UNABLE TO MAKE IT.
AGENDA ITEM 1 IS NOW OFF OF OUR AGENDA.
IF WE COULD, MR. HUSAIN, GO THROUGH THE AGENDA AT THIS
TIME.
05:05:24PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
TO CLEAR THE RECORD, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE.
FILE NO. REZ-22-107 IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE FROM TODAY
TO MARCH 9, 2023.
THE APPLICANT IS HERE.
05:05:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND IN THAT -- LET'S GO AHEAD AND HAVE
EVERYONE THAT IS GOING TO BE SPEAKING ON ANY AGENDA ITEMS OR
PRESENTING ANYTHING FOR THESE AGENDA ITEMS WHICH IS PROBABLY
MOST OF YOU HERE, WILL YOU PLEASE RISE TO BE SWORN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
05:06:17PM >>CLERK:
YOU MAY BE SEATED.
05:06:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IF THAT IS GOING FOR THE CASE, CAN WE HEAR
FROM THE PETITIONER PLEASE.
05:06:25PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
THIS APPLICATION WENT BACK TO THE CITY STAFF TWO WEEKS AGO.
AND BECAUSE OF THAT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE FOR US TO NOTICE
AND GET BACK TO YOU ON AN APPROPRIATE TIME AND DATE.
SO WE WORKED WITH THE STAFF.
AND THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF US REQUESTING THE MARCH
CONTINUANCE.
05:06:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THIS THE FIRST TIME IT HAS BEEN
CONTINUED?
05:06:54PM >> I DON'T -- I DON'T -- I THINK IT IS THE SECOND TIME.
05:06:56PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND TIME.
05:06:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ONLY THE SECOND TIME.
THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI.
FOR ONE SECOND, PLEASE, MR. SHELBY, ONE SECOND PLEASE.
05:07:06PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES, I AM SORRY?
05:07:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NO. REZ-22-107?
ABOUT THE CONTINUANCE ONLY.
SEEING NONE, AND I DO NOT SEE ANYONE ON LINE.
MR. SHELBY.
05:07:24PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. MICHELINI, YOU REQUESTED MARCH 9, 2023,
IS THAT YOUR REQUEST?
05:07:31PM >> THAT IS THE DATE THAT THE STAFF AGREED TO, YES.
05:07:33PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WILL THAT GIVE YOU -- BEING THIS IS A
REQUEST -- A SECOND REQUEST.
WILL THAT GIVE YOU ENOUGH TIME TO BE PREPARED FOR
PRESENTATION ON MARCH 9?
I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT YOU FEEL -- BECAUSE YOU KNOW
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO CITY COUNCIL WITH REGARDS TO THEIR
CONTINUANCES.
THEY HAVE.
05:07:53PM >> WELL, THE DRC IDENTIFIED WHAT THE CHANGES WERE THAT THEY
WERE REQUESTING.
WE MADE THOSE CHANGES.
AND WE WILL BE READY TO GO FORWARD IN MARCH.
05:08:02PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OKAY.
YOU UNDERSTAND --
05:08:05PM >> I UNDERSTAND WE ARE IN JEOPARDY IF WE HAVE TO ASK FOR
ANOTHER ONE.
05:08:09PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I DON'T WANT TO USE THOSE TERMS.
05:08:12PM >> THAT'S CLEAR IN JEOPARDY ASKING FOR A THIRD CONTINUANCE.
05:08:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO 180-DAY RULE.
05:08:20PM >> SO MOVED, MR. CHAIRMAN.
05:08:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
05:08:23PM >> DO WE HAVE A 180-DAY ISSUE?
I AM SORRY?
05:08:28PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK.
I BELIEVE THE 180-DAY WAS GRANTED FOR THE LAST REQUEST.
IT WILL APPLY BEYOND THE 180 DAYS.
05:08:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
A MOTION MADE BY -- I AM SORRY, I SEE HANDS GOING UP BEHIND
ME.
I ALREADY ASKED IF ANYONE WANTED TO SPEAK TO THE
CONTINUANCE.
05:08:49PM >> SORRY, I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT YOU GUYS WERE SPEAKING UP UNTIL
I LOOKED UP --
05:08:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MA'AM, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NO. REZ-22-107, TO THE CONTINUANCE ONLY.
MA'AM, PLEASE -- PLEASE COME UP HERE.
05:09:12PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. CHAIRMAN --
05:09:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MA'AM.
YES, MR. SHELBY?
05:09:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUST SO THE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE ADDRESS
AT 1206 WEST LEMON STREET.
05:09:23PM >> WE DIDN'T KNOW THE ADDRESS WHEN YOU SAID THE NAME.
NEVER TOLD US THE NAME.
05:09:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PLEASE STAND IN FRONT OF OUR PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
05:09:33PM >> OCTAVIA SIMPSON, OWNER.
WE HAVE BEEN SPEAKING WITH CENTURY 21, AND THEY NEVER TOLD US
OF A CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 9.
05:09:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT HAS JUST BEEN ASKED FOR.
05:09:45PM >> WE DON'T WANT A CONTINUANCE.
05:09:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
GIVE US A REASON YOU DON'T WANT THE
CONTINUANCE.
05:09:49PM >> BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN WAITING SINCE APRIL OF LAST YEAR.
THEY CONTINUED IT FROM SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER TO FEBRUARY AND
NOW THEY ARE TRYING TO CONTINUE IT UNTIL MARCH.
THEY SAID TODAY WILL BE WHEN EVERYTHING SHOULD BE DONE.
05:10:04PM >> I WILL EXPLAINED THAT WE HAVE -- WE HAVE SITE PLAN AND
DESIGN ISSUES THAT ARE BEYOND OUR CONTROL.
AND THE CITY STAFF HAVEN'T HAD THE SUFFICIENT TIME TO FINISH
A REPORT.
SO THEY NEVER FINISHED THEIR REPORT TO PRESENT TO CITY
COUNCIL THAT THEY HAVE TO DO AT LEAST ONE WEEK ADVANCE.
SO WE -- THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING IN FRONT OF THEM TO
CONSIDER RIGHT NOW.
I AM SORRY.
05:10:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. MICHELINI -- MA'AM, COME BACK BECAUSE WE
ARE RECORDING YOU AS YOU ARE SPEAKING.
MA'AM, DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON NOW?
OKAY.
MR. GUDES -- COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:10:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SO I CAN GET CLARIFICATION.
ARE YOU PROPERTY OWNER FOR THIS PROPERTY, MA'AM?
05:10:54PM >> YES.
05:10:55PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YOU ARE SAYING YOU DON'T WANT TO CONTINUE
WHAT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MR. MICHELINI IS DOING.
05:11:01PM >> HE NEVER TOLD US ANYTHING.
05:11:05PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YOU HAVEN'T BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH MR.
MICHELINI FROM LAST YEAR, AND NOW WHY HE IS COMING BEFORE US.
05:11:11PM >> THIS IS MY FIRST TIME MEETING MR. MICHELINI.
05:11:14PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIRMAN, IF YOU DON'T MIND.
POINT OF PRIVILEGE, I THINK MR. MICHELINI AND HIS CLIENT MAY
NEED TO GO AND DISCUSS WHAT IS GOING ON AND THEN COME BACK
BECAUSE MAYBE SHE ISN'T CLEAR WHAT THE PROCESS OF THE AGENT.
05:11:31PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF I CAN INQUIRE OF MR. MICHELINI.
ARE YOU THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE?
05:11:37PM >> I AM, BUT I AM NOT THE ONE INTERFACING THEM.
THE REALTOR HAS BEEN INTERFACING THE FAMILY.
THE PROPERTY IS IN AN ESTATE.
AND THERE IS FIVE TO FIVE --
05:11:48PM >> THREE OF THE FIVE ARE HERE TODAY.
05:11:50PM >> FIVE DIFFERENT OWNERS THAT WE HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH, BUT
THE REALTOR HAS BEEN DOING THAT.
AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THEM NOT COMMUNICATING WITH YOU.
I AM ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE -- TRYING TO FACILITATE WHAT
YOU WANT.
AND WE CANNOT GET YOUR PROJECT WITH THE TOWN HOUSES IN FRONT
OF CITY COUNCIL BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T MET THE TECHNICAL
STANDARDS FOR A REVIEW.
DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO YOU?
05:12:18PM >> NO.
05:12:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. MICHELINI, WOULD YOU LIKE AN
OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH THEM?
05:12:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. MICHELINI, I SUGGEST YOU TAKE THIS WOMAN
OUTSIDE AND ANY OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THIS PROPERTY.
AND HAVE A DISCUSSION OUTSIDE AND COME BACK LATER AFTER WE
GO THROUGH THE REST OF THE AGENDA.
05:12:32PM >> THE NEXT CASE IS MINE AS WELL.
05:12:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ARE GOING THROUGH THE AGENDA REVIEW AT
THIS TIME RIGHT NOW, MR. MICHELINI.
AZAM IS THE DESIGNER OF THE PROJECT.
I WILL LET HIM EXPLAIN TO THEM.
05:12:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSAIN.
05:12:57PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
NEXT ITEM TO BE REMOVED, FILE NO. REZ-23-15.
THIS IS A NOT A MISNOTICE.
JUST NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
05:13:09PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SO MOVED.
05:13:10PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
05:13:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
05:13:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
05:13:25PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
05:13:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
MR. SHELBY.
05:13:34PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
JUST VERY BRIEFLY, IF THERE HAVE BEEN ANY VERBAL EX-PARTE
COMMUNICATIONS DISCLOSE THEM PRIOR TO THE HEARING BEGINNING
AND I WOULD LIKE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ANY WRITTEN
EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS.
05:13:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2.
FILE NO. REZ-22-89.
05:14:03PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
YES, WE CAN.
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSED REZONING IS AT 3410 NORTH 11th STREET.
PROPOSED FROM RS-50 TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
05:14:20PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR FIRST CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
MORE SPECIFICALLY EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
A MAP OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE HERE.
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH MORGAN STREET AND EAST
COLUMBUS DRIVE.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR BLOCKS TO THE
SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE.
I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
THIS CASE IS WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF REPUBLICA DE CUBA
AND 6th AVENUE.
SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A EVACUATION ZONE.
THE CLOSEST RECREATION IS BURRELL PARK LOCATED 1,000 FEET
WEST OF THE SITE.
ADOPTED LAND USE MAP.
YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY THE RESIDENTIAL -- IT IS RECOGNIZED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION AND SURROUNDED BY THE
RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION ON ALL SIDES.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE CASE AND FOUND NO
ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS SITUATED 150 FEET NORTHEAST OF NORTH
11th STREET AND EAST 6th AVENUE.
AND THE SURROUNDING AREA HAVE A MIX OF DETACHED
SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.
PORTION OF NORTH 21TH STREET BETWEEN NORTH 28th AVENUE
CONTAIN PARCELS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION AND ARE
UTILIZED FOR DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
THIS SEGMENT IS ALSO DEVELOPED AT A DENSITY OF .49.
DENSITY OF .47 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS COMPARABLE TO THE
SURROUNDING DENSITY IN THE AREA.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST IS
COMPARABLE TO THE -- TO THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN
SURROUNDING AREA.
THE FOUR ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS ARE NOT ADJACENT TO
THE.PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT THE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE
UNITS FROM NORTH 11th STREET AND THE ALLEY.
THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
WHICH WILL HELP IMPROVE THE EXPERIENCE BY ASSURING ACCESS TO
THE SIDEWALK ON NORTH 11th STREET.
IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST WILL MAINTAIN THE CIVILITY OF THE
EXISTING AREA AND GIVE HOUSING CAN CHOICES IN THE CENTRAL
TAMPA DISTRICT.
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE OF THE VILLAGE AND OF THE
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION.
BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
OF THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
ANY QUESTIONS.
05:18:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
05:18:13PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL FIRST GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE AERIAL REVIEW OF THE
PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
IT IS ENCOMPASSED AND SURROUNDED BY ALL RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AND THESE ARE ALL ZONED RS-50.
AS YOU SEE TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE EAST 28th AVENUE.
TO THE SOUTHEAST 26th AVENUE.
IF YOU GO TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE DEVIN STREET.
IF YOU GO OUT TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN OF THE PROPERTY PROPOSED BY
THE APPLICANT.
THIS IS ON -- THIS SHEET IS ON PAGE 4 OF THE SITE PLAN
PACKAGE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, THE APPLICANT HERE IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP FOUR
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS.
WE HAVE ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR.
ON PAGE TWO OF THE STAFF REPORT, THESE ARE BROKEN DOWN BY
THE WATT, SQUARE FOOTAGE PER LOT, THE BUILDING SETBACKS PER
LOT AND THE SETBACKS FOR LOT.
THE CURRENT TIME IS VACANT.
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED 35 FEET.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL COME OFF NORTH 11th STREET
AS YOU SEE COMING ON IN.
ALL FOUR UNITS.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND ALSO
IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
NOW THESE ELEVATIONS, IF APPROVED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING, THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO MAKE CHANGES AND LABEL
THESE ELEVATIONS PER UNIT.
BUT FROM THE FRONT OF THE BUILDINGS, THIS IS THE ELEVATION
THAT YOU CAN SEE.
TO THE REAR OF EACH UNIT.
ONE SIDE ELEVATION.
AND THE OTHER SIDE ELEVATION.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES.
THE CURRENT SITE IS VACANT AT THE TIME.
THE VACANT SITE WITH THE PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN.
ACROSS THE STREET TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL
HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
ALSO ACROSS THE STREET, MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AT
THE ATTACHED HOMES.
TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED HOMES.
AND TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE.
WE HAVE ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL DETACHED HOME.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOUR WAIVERS.
THE STAFF REPORT HAD FIVE, BUT ONE IS A DUPLICATE.
FOUR REQUESTED WAIVERS HERE.
THESE ARE FROM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, URBAN DESIGN AND
NATURAL RESOURCES.
THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
PETITION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE CITY COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THEY MUST PROVIDE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING PER THE REVISION SHEET.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
05:22:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:22:50PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
PUT THE SITE PLAN AGAIN.
I WAS TRYING TO VISUALIZE WHEN I SAW THE ACTUAL PARKING.
SEE THE GARAGES ON THE HOME.
WHERE THE PARKING IS GOING TO IT BE.
OKAY.
05:23:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHY IS THE -- ANYONE ELSE?
WHY HAS THE CITY FOUND THIS INCONSISTENT?
05:23:28PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
STAFF FOUND IF INCONSISTENT WITH THE WAIVERS
THROUGH URBAN DESIGN, AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE AMOUNT
OF CHANGES THEY NEED TO DO ON THE SITE PLAN.
05:23:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:23:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC?
I THINK THAT'S -- LIKE WHAT ARE THE ACTUAL WAIVERS.
05:23:47PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THE WAIVERS HERE ARE NATURAL RESOURCES HAD
TO REMOVE TWO NONHAZARDOUS LIVE GRAND OAKS.
ALSO, YOU HAD DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION HAVE A REQUEST TO
ALLOW BUILDING FRONTS TO ORIENT TOWARD THE INTERIOR OF THE
ZONING LOT.
YOU HAD URBAN DESIGN REQUEST TO ALLOW FRONT YARD SETBACKS AT
A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET.
AND NATURAL RESOURCES HAD REQUESTED TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
EIGHT-FOOT VUA BUFFER TO ZERO FEET ALONG THE WEST -- THE
UNAPPROVED ALLEYWAY.
05:24:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MAY I HAVE FORESTRY UP HERE.
I AM LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN I SEE ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR,
FIVE, SIX, SEVEN -- WHAT APPEARS TO BE LARGE OAK TREES.
THEY ARE SAVING THE SEVEN BUT ONLY TWO?
05:24:43PM >>ERIN MAEHR:
ERIN MAEHR WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WAS GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS BECAUSE A LITTLE UNUSUAL FOR
NATURAL RESOURCES TO BE INCONSISTENT AND SPEAK ON THE
PROJECT, BUT THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH US A LOT TO TRY
TO ORIENT THE LOTS AND TO PRESERVE AS MANY GRAND TREES AS
POSSIBLE.
05:25:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THEN MAYBE I AM NOT -- SHOULDN'T BE ASKING
YOU.
MAYBE THE PETITIONER NEEDS TO MAKE HIS PLEA ON THIS.
SO LET'S -- LET'S HEAR FROM THE PETITIONER.
UNLESS THERE ARE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU, WE WILL HEAR FROM YOU IN A SECOND.
PETITIONER.
COME ON UP.
WAITING ON YOU.
05:25:40PM >> GOOD EVENING, DANIEL SHOCKEY WITH NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING.
I HAVEN'T BEEN SWORN IN YET.
05:25:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE WHO HAS NOT BEEN SWORN IN AND GIVING
ANY TYPE OF TESTIMONY WITH ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS TONIGHT,
PLEASE STAND, RISE, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
THERE WE GO.
[SWEARING IN]
05:26:09PM >> I DO.
05:26:10PM >> I THANK CITY STAFF AND THE COUNCIL.
THE SITE PLAN AS THEY SHOWN YOU, WE MADE THE CHANGES THAT
THE CITY STAFF HAS REFERRED TO.
ALREADY THESE CHANGES THEY ACCEPTED WERE VERY MINOR LIKE
ERIN WAS TALKING ABOUT.
THE GREAT LENGTHS WE HAVE GONE THROUGH TO SAVE FIVE OUT OF
THE SEVEN GRAND OAKS ON THIS PROPERTY.
WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS SINCE OCTOBER, I BELIEVE, WAS
OUR FIRST SCHEDULED HEARING.
WE HAVE GONE TO GREAT LENGTHS TO SAVE THESE TREES AND HAPPY
TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT IT.
05:26:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:26:52PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THIS IS A VERY UNUSUAL PARCEL.
JUST VERY UNUSUAL.
AND I THINK THIS IS A VERY CREATIVE WAY TO USE -- TO PUT
SOME SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THERE IN TRYING TO FIT WITH THE
NEIGHBORHOOD AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
I JUST -- YEAH, THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY.
05:27:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
THE CHANGES YOU MADE, THAT THE STAFF WAS ASKING FOR.
HAVE YOU ALREADY MADE THEM OR DO THEY HAVE TO BE MADE
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
05:27:30PM >> THEY HAVE BEEN MADE BUT PRESENT IT BETWEEN.
05:27:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM -- ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT
WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
FILE NO. REZ-22-89?
05:27:49PM >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS OLUSOLABOMI OLUSAYA, PARTNER WITH
THE YOUNG MAN.
LOCATED IN CLEARWATER AT SOUTH BELCHER ROAD.
I WANT TO STATE AS YOU FOLKS HAVE ITERATED, THIS SITE IS
EXTREMELY CHALLENGING.
VERY UNUSUAL SHAPE.
IT HAS A LOT OF REALLY NICE OAKS, GRAND OAKS, BEAUTIFUL
OAKS.
I HAVE BEEN THERE SEVERAL TEAMS.
I HAVE TAKEN MANY PICTURES.
OWNER IS HERE WITH US HERE TONIGHT.
SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO
ANSWER.
MR. SOLO IN THE BACK WITH HIS WONDERFUL WIFE ARE HERE TO
ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
BUT I WANTED TO RECOGNIZE THE STAFF FOR DOING A WONDERFUL
JOB WITH US.
IT HAS TAKEN A WHILE TO GET THE PROJECT TO WHERE IT IS.
IN THE BEGINNING, IT WAS TOTALLY DIFFERENT, BUT WORKING WITH
STAFF VERY CLOSELY, WITH THE LANDSCAPE DEPARTMENT, WITH THE
ZONING, WE HAVE GOTTEN IT TO A POINT WHERE WE FEEL
COMFORTABLE AND I HOPE YOU FOLKS FEEL COMFORTABLE TOO.
THE TIME THAT HAS GONE ON, OF COURSE, HAS EFFECTED THE
ECONOMY.
AND WE WANTED TO BE SURE THAT WE CAN GET THIS PROJECT WITH
YOUR BLESSINGS APPROVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT
HOPEFULLY THE ECONOMY WILL NOT GO FURTHER DOWN AND HAVE
ADVERSE EFFECTS ON US.
BUT WE ARE TRYING TO GET THIS PROJECT WITH YOUR BLESSINGS
APPROVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT WE ARE ABLE TO
HOPEFULLY SELL, YOU KNOW, OWNERSHIP.
MAKE A PROFIT ON THIS SUBDIVISION.
I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
05:29:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
I WOULD -- THANK YOU, SIR.
I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM FORESTRY AT THIS TIME, PLEASE.
05:29:42PM >>ERIN MAEHR:
ERIN MAEHR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
SO WHEN THE APPLICANT HAD ORIGINALLY COME TO US, THEY WERE
PROPOSING TO REMOVE FIVE GRAND TREES.
AND SO THIS IS THE SITE PLAN HERE.
AND THEY CHANGED THEIR SETBACKS.
THEY CHANGED, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING ENVELOPES TO
ACCOMMODATE THE GRAND TREES AND GIVING THEM ALMOST THEIR
FULL PROTECTIVE RADII.
IN CASES WHERE YOU SEE PERMEABLE PAVEMENT AND THINGS OF THAT
NATURE.
I JUST WANTED TO SHOW THIS HERE.
A PICTURE, YOU KNOW, OF THE SITE.
IT IS -- IT IS VERY DENSE, ESPECIALLY TO THE WEST ALONG THE
ALLEY WHERE YOU HAVE THIS GRAND LIVE OAK IN THE FRONT IS
STAYING.
THAT TREE IS BEING PRESERVED.
PROBABLY THE LARGEST TREE OUT THERE.
AND THEN THIS IS KIND OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IN THE SITE.
AND BECAUSE OF THE LIMITED LIGHT BACK THERE, THE TREES HAVE
GROWN PRETTY UPRIGHT WHICH IS GOOD FOR CONSTRUCTION.
YOU ARE ABLE -- YOU DON'T HAVE TO PRUNE SO MUCH OFF OF THE
TREES, BUT THEY NEED WAIVERS TO REMOVE TWO OF THEM THAT WE
THOUGHT WE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT AS THEY ARE
PRESERVING FIVE OF THE TREES.
ONE OF THOSE IS OFF-SITE AS WELL.
SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'M HERE.
05:31:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:31:16PM >>BILL CARLSON:
QUICK QUESTION.
THE GRAND OAK IN THE FRONT --
05:31:21PM >> YEP.
05:31:21PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT IS THE RATING ON THAT TREE?
05:31:26PM >> THIS TREE IS ACTUALLY RATED C-9.
05:31:30PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ABOUT HALFWAY UP AND UP, IT LOOKS LIKE --
05:31:34PM >> THERE IS SOME DISCOLORATION THERE, BUT --
05:31:37PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IT IS A BEAUTIFUL TREE.
I WAS JUST WONDERING.
05:31:40PM >> A LIVE OAK IN THIS SORT OF SITUATION.
THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD BE, LIKE, THIS NEEDS TO
BE REMOVED.
05:31:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
COUNCILMAN GUDES, YOU WERE WONDERING ABOUT THE GARAGES
EARLIER.
DID YOU GET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED?
05:32:05PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
[OFF MIC]
--
05:32:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PETITIONER, COULD YOU PLEASE COME UP TO THE
PODIUM.
05:32:28PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
EXPLAIN THIS PARKING TO ME.
05:32:31PM >> THE PARKING WILL BE HANDLED BY CARPORTS.
05:32:35PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
CARPORT?
05:32:37PM >> CARPORT AND ONE OF THE DRIVEWAYS IN THE PLAN THAT YOU SAW
WILL BE SHIFTED SO THEY WILL BE ABLE TO DRIVE RIGHT IN.
EVERYBODY BUT ONE LOT WILL HAVE A DRIVEWAY THAT WILL PROVIDE
PARKING AND A CARPORT TO PROVIDE PARKING.
THE ONE YOU SEE IS TURNED.
WE HAD TO ELIMINATE THE DRIVEWAY PARKING BUT A FULL CARPORT
FOR TWO SPOTS.
EVERYBODY HAS TWO SPOTS IN EVERY HOME.
05:33:01PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
TWO SPOTS.
OKAY.
05:33:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:33:05PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT ALLEY ACCESS -- SIR?
IS THAT ALLEY AN OPEN ALLEY?
05:33:12PM >> AS FAR AS --
05:33:14PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
IS IT USABLE.
05:33:15PM >> ACCESSIBLE.
IT CAN BE ACCESSED BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.
IT IS NOT AND ONE END IS CLOSED YOU HAVE.
IT CAN BE PAVED FROM 26 ON DOWN.
IF WE WERE TO PAVE HALF OF IT CAN PROVIDE ACCESS BUT ONLY 15
FEET WIDE, I BELIEVE.
05:33:33PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
05:33:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER 2, FILE NO. REZ-22-89?
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
05:33:48PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:33:49PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
05:33:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:34:03PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NO. REZ-22-89
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL ARE VICINITY OF
3410 NORTH 11th STREET IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXCEPTION 1, DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION RS-50, TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:34:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SECOND.
05:34:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE -- MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:34:39PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:34:43PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:34:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:34:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:34:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:34:51PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
05:34:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:34:53PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
05:35:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
WE ARE BACK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FILE NO. REZ-22-107.
MR. MICHELINI.
05:35:17PM >> AS YOU KNOW, REZONING PROCESS IS NOT EASILY UNDERSTOOD,
AND BECAUSE WE HAD TO GO BACK TO THE CITY STAFF FOR DRC, THE
FAMILY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS GOING ON.
WE HAVE EXPLAINED IT TO THEM NOW.
AND WE ALSO HAVE EXPLAINED THEY CAN NOT GO FORWARD THIS
EVENING BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVALUATION MADE OF THE SITE
PLAN OR DO YOU HAVE A STAFF REPORT.
SO I APOLOGIZE TO YOU ALL FOR THE CONFUSION.
WE WILL TRY TO TAKE BETTER CARE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE
MORE CLEARLY INFORMED BEFORE COMING BACK.
05:35:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THIS GENTLEMAN ONE OF THE PROPERTY
OWNERS?
05:35:57PM >> YES, SIR, HE IS ONE OF THE FIVE MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY.
05:36:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SIR, DO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS
UNDERSTAND WHY MICHELINI, THE REPRESENTATIVE, IS ASKING FOR
THE CONTINUANCE?
05:36:09PM >> CONTINUANCE?
05:36:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU UNDERSTAND THE REASON WHY?
05:36:13PM >> YES.
05:36:15PM >> YOU DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS?
05:36:17PM >> NO, NO I DON'T.
05:36:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS WISH TO SPEAK TO
NUMBER THREE, FILE NO. REZ-22-107.
THE CONTINUANCE ONLY.
05:36:27PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CONTINUE TO MARCH 9, 2023, 5:01
P.M.
05:36:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
05:36:42PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND YOUR
PATIENCE.
05:36:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, FILE NO. REZ-22-65.
MR. HUSAIN.
05:36:58PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS CASE IS PROPOSED REZONING 2304 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM RM-24 TO PD, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
05:37:14PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS, AGAIN, WITH
YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
THE CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE
SPECIFICALLY TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
ROBERT C. GARNER PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY
TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP QUARTER OF A MILE OF NORTH TAMPA
STREET.
HART 1 AND 6 PROVIDING CONNECTIONS TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA,
THE UNIVERSITY AREA AND THE PARK.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN THE EVACUATION ZONE.
AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR
TO THE WEST OF HIGHLAND AVENUE.
THIS IS NORTH OLA AVENUE HERE.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ALLOWS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND
APRIL LOW MULTIFAMILY, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED
SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS ROBERT C. GARNER
PARK RECOGNIZED UNDER OPEN.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND CONSISTENT
WITH THE YEAR.
THE AVERAGE DENSITY ON NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE ON RESIDENTIAL
ZONED PARCELS WEST OF SOUTH FRANCIS, EAST OF OLA AND NORTH
OF WEST PARK, IS 6.23 DWELLING UNITS.ER ACRE.
THIS AREA IS PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 35
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
SO THE SURROUNDING AN AREA IS -- CAN BE CONSIDERED
UNDERDEVELOPED WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE.
IF APPROVED, THE SUBJECT SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED AT AN
OVERALL DWELLING UNIT OF 19 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
DEVELOPMENTS OF ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR TO A
NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK AND STREET WHICH IS SATISFIED THROUGH
THIS PROPOSED PD.
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS, UNITS 2 TO 4 CONNECT
AS THE FRONT DOOR FROM NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PERIMETER OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIRES HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA AND FUTURE
POPULATIONS.
ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT
CITY STRATEGY WHICH IS IN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT AND
EMPLOYMENT SERVICES.
AND ALSO THE -- THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST
SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE CITY'S URBAN VILLAGES.
THIS REQUEST WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING WITH THE TAMPA
HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES OF THE
POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
ANY QUESTIONS.
05:40:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
SEEING NONE.
MR. HUSAIN.
05:40:32PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL FIRST GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE SITE.
AS YOU SEE, THE SITE HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE ZONED RM-24.
YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
AND ALSO, YOU HAVE OFFICE USE.
TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE RM-24, ZONED RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.
TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE ZONE PD AND A VACANT LOT AT THIS
TIME.
AND THEN TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE A PARK, HIGHLAND PARK
ZONED PD TO THE EAST.
I WILL SHOW YOU A LITTLE BIT OF A BROADER VIEW.
SO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHERE THIS IS.
WE HAVE WEST PARK AVENUE TO THE SOUTH.
YOU ALSO HAVE ARMATURE WORKS DOWN HERE TO THE SOUTH.
YOU HAVE WEST AMELIA UP HERE TO THE NORTH.
IF YOU GO TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE NORTH TAMPA STREET.
AND IF YOU GO OUT TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE -- YOU WILL GO
DOWN AND SEE -- YOU HAVE ARMATURE WORKS AND ALSO NORTH
WOODROW AVENUE.
I WILL NOW SHARE THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
05:41:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSAIN, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:41:59PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE MAP.
I HAVE A RANDOM QUESTION.
WHY WOULD A PARK BE ZONED PD.
SHOULDN'T IT BE NATURAL SOMETHING OR OTHER.
05:42:09PM >> THIS PARK IS ZONED PD AT THE TIME.
05:42:14PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YEAH, LET'S WORK ON THAT.
05:42:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM SURE THEY WILL COME BACK.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:42:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THAT PARK GOES INTO A PARK,
ROUNDABOUT -- THE ROUNDABOUT PARK.
THE STREET DEAD ENDS INTO THE PARK.
BECAUSE THE TECHNICAL CENTER IS ON THE BACK END.
05:42:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I BIKE BY THAT PARK EVERY WEEK.
05:42:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSAIN, PLEASE CONTINUE.
05:42:45PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
OF COURSE.
I WILL SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED UNITS.
THE PROPERTY IS ON NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE AS YOU SEE HERE TO
THE EAST.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 9255 SQUARE FEET OR
APPROXIMATELY .21 ACRES.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING FOUR UNITS HERE.
THREE UNITS THAT ARE RESIDENTIAL -- RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HERE.
AND ONE UNIT THAT IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
AND THAT IS FACING NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE.
THE LOT, AT THIS TIME, CURRENTLY HAS A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
ON IT.
THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 40 FEET IN HEIGHT.
THE PARKING, THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING 14.
AND THE CODE REQUIRES 9 SPACES.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO UNIT ONE IS PROVIDED FROM NORTH HIGHLAND
AVENUE HERE.
AND FOR UNITS TWO THROUGH FOUR, VEHICULAR ACCESS PROVIDED TO
THE NORTH ON AN ALLEY HERE.
I WILL NOW SHARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT
ELEVATION TO THE EAST ELEVATION TO THE WEST.
ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH.
OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
AND THE ELEVATION TO THE NORTH OF THE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
NOW LOOKING AT THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
YOU HAVE NORTH ELEVATION AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
AS PER THE REVISION SHEET, THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE
ELEVATIONS FOR THE EAST AND THE WEST ALSO HERE.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES, I WILL SHOW YOU
WHAT I SAW.
THIS IS THE SITE AS IS.
TO THE NORTH.
YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND ALSO OFFICE USES.
TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE HIGHLAND PARK.
AND ANOTHER VIEW OF HIGHLAND PARK HERE.
AND TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SIX WAIVERS HERE.
AND THIS IS A COMBINATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE FIRST WAIVER IS TO REQUEST TO ALLOW REDUCTION FROM 24
FEET TO 18 FEET.
THE SECOND WAIVER IS REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
EIGHT-FOOT VUA BUFFER TO FIVE FEET TO THE WEST.
THE THIRD REQUESTED WAIVER TO REDUCE THE FIVE-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO FOUR FEET TO THE SOUTH FOR ADJACENT
MULTIFAMILY USE.
NUMBER FOUR, IS A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 350 SQUARE
FEET GREEN SPACE TO 360 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT.
THE FIFTH REQUESTED WAIVER IS REQUEST TO REDUCE THE 20% VUA
GREEN SPACE TO 60% GREEN SPACE.
SIXTH REQUEST FOR A WAIVER A REQUEST TO ALLOW FRONT DOORS
FOR UNITS TWO, THREE AND FOUR TO FACE -- TO FACE SIDE YARD
PROPERTY LINES.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THEIR
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL STAFF TO BE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD BE COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT
MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST
AND SECOND READING.
ANY QUESTIONS?
05:47:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUSAIN?
THANK YOU.
05:47:42PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THANK YOU.
05:47:43PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER.
WE MADE SOME REVISIONS TO THE SITE PLAN SO THERE ARE FOUR
WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED INSTEAD OF THE SIX.
WE HAVE REVIEWED THAT -- BASICALLY PROVIDED TO STAFF.
AND WE ALSO HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT THEY HAD
RAISED.
AND WE HAVE MADE THOSE REVISIONS.
THE SITE -- I WILL GO THROUGH THOSE IN A SECOND.
THE SITE IS JUST UNDER 10,000 SQUARE FEET, 2955 SQUARE FEET.
WE HAVE -- WE HAVE REDUCED THESE BUFFERS AND CHANGED THE
SITE PLAN.
LET ME -- WE HAVE ELIMINATED THE VEHICLE GREEN SPACE FROM
232 TO 192 SQUARE FEET.
WE ALSO REDUCED THE REQUIRED FIVE-FOOT USE TO USE
LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM FOUR FEET TO THE SOUTH.
THE WAIVERS ARE TO ALLOW THE REDUCTION OF THE AISLE WIDTH
FROM 24 TO 18 WHICH IS WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE
ALLOWABLE CODE.
THE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MULTIFAMILY GREEN SPACE FROM 350
-- WE INCREASED THE GREEN SPACE AND NOW 290 SQUARE FEET.
REDUCED THE REQUIRED VEHICULAR USE AREA FROM EIGHT FEET TO
FIVE FEET ALONG THE WEST PART OF THE ALLEY.
WE CHANGED THAT.
AND THE SECTION TO ALLOW THE FRONT DOORS OF UNITS TWO
THROUGH FOUR TO FACE THE SIDE YARD PROPERTY UNITS.
WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND USE CODE, WE ARE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP
SEVEN UNITS; HOWEVER, SEVEN UNITS WILL NOT PRACTICALLY FIT
ON THIS SITE.
WHAT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WOULD LIKE TO DO IS DEMOLISH
THE EXISTING HOUSE AND REBUILD HIS HOUSE AND MAINTAIN THAT
HERE.
THAT WOULD BE A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
AND THEN WE PROPOSE THREE TOWN HOUSES HERE, WHICH WOULD
ACCESS THE ALLEY.
THERE ARE THREE OTHER TOWN HOUSE PROJECTS TO THE NORTH AND
TO THE WEST THAT ACCESS THAT ALLEY NOW.
AND IT WILL BE COMPLETELY IMPROVED AND BUILT TO CITY'S
STANDARDS.
WE INCREASED THE GREEN SPACE HERE AND HERE AND THE DOORWAYS
WILL NOW FACE THE ALLEY AND NOT -- NOT A REGULAR STREET.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE MEET WANT TO LOOK AT IN THE FUTURE
IS THAT ALLEYS SINCE THEY ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE
UTILIZED FOR ACCESS, THAT THAT CODE PROVISION THAT SAYS YOU
HAVE TO SEEK A WAIVER, YOU MIGHT WANT TO LOOK AT THAT,
BECAUSE ESPECIALLY IN THESE INFILL PROJECTS WHERE YOU ARE
TRYING TO PROVIDE MORE HOUSING, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT.
BUT YOU ARE ALSO TRYING TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF THE ALLEYS,
WHICH -- YOU HAVE A CONFLICT IN THE CODE WHEN THAT OCCURS.
WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE CODE ITSELF.
WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE BIGGER PICTURE REGARDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE COUNTY STAFF WENT THROUGH A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS THAT WE
MEET WITH RESPECT TO THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
WE ARE REQUIRED TWO SPACES PER UNIT.
WHAT IS UNUSUAL HERE WITH OUR -- WITH OUR PROJECT THAT WE
ARE BEFORE YOU WITH, WE ARE PROVIDING 14 PEACES WHEN NINE
ARE REQUIRED.
SO WE ARE REDUCING THE ABILITY FOR THE OFF-STREET OR
ON-STREET PARKING FOR SOMEBODY TO HAVE TO ACCESS THAT.
AND AGAIN, THE UNITS REGARDING THE TOWN HOUSES ARE ALL
COMING OFF THE ALLEY.
THE OWNER WISHES TO HAVE HIS ACCESS OFF OF HIGHLAND, WHICH
IS WHERE THE CURRENT ACCESS IS.
SO WE HAVE TAKEN THIS AND DEVELOPED WHAT I THINK IS AN
UNIQUE SOLUTION TO A DEFENSE EVERYBODY EWE WHERE WE HAVE
TRANSFERRED THE ACCESS FOR THE TOWN HOUSES TO THE REAR.
AND WE HAVE MAINTAINED THE SINGLE-FAMILY ACCESS TO EXACTLY
WHERE IT IS NOW.
THIS PROPERTY IN HERE IS PROPOSED FOR TOWN HOUSES.
THE PROPERTY NORTH OF HERE IS TOWN HOUSES.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHERE WE ARE PLANNING TO
D[L]EMOLL EVERYBODIY EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE.
AND THIS IS THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO WISHES TO MAINTAIN HIS
RESIDENCE THERE.
THIS IS LOOKING DOWN THE STREET.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DOWN HERE.
AND YOU CAN SEE WE ARE ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES IN
IF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
THIS IS A CLOSER VIEW SHOWING YOU -- THIS IS THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY HERE AND THE DRIVEWAY HERE WHICH WE ARE TRYING TO
MAINTAIN AND REBUILD A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE HERE.
THERE ARE ONLY THREE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THIS
SECTION OF THE STREET.
TWO TO THE SOUTH.
ONE OF THEM HAS ALREADY BEEN REDEVELOPED AND THIS ONE IS
PROPOSED TO BE REDEVELOPED.
AND YOU CAN SEE WE ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO COMMERCIAL USES
ALREADY.
WHEN WE TALK OF THE LAND USE PLAN AND ALLOWING UP TO -- UP
TO THE MAXIMUM, WHICH WOULD BE THE SEVEN UNITS UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL-35, YOU WOULD HAVE TO BUILD IT HIGHER.
AND YOU WOULD HAVE TO USE IT -- AND IT WOULD NOT BE
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
IT WILL BE CONDOMINIUM STYLE OR APARTMENT STYLE.
SO WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE CODE, AND YOU WANT THAT
ADDITIONAL HOUSING, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DO THAT.
AND ALSO MEET ALL OF THE REST OF THE PARAMETERS THAT ARE
ESTABLISHED IN THE CODE.
WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE RESPONSES FROM THE PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF, IT SAYS TO PROMOTE EFFICIENT AND
SUSTAINABLE USES OF THE LAND FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAREFUL
CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS.
THIS HAS TOWN HOUSES ALL AROUND IT.
THIS WILL NOT CREATE AN ADVERSE IMPACT TO ANY SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
ALLOW THE INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENT LAND USE AND DENSITIES.
MAINTAINED THE SINGLE-FAMILY ON HIGHLAND AND REQUESTING THE
ABILITY TO DEVELOP THE TOWN HOUSES ALONG THE REAR SIDE OF
THE PROPERTY.
ACKNOWLEDGE THE CHANGING NEEDS IN TECHNOLOGIES.
WE ASKED FOR CONSIDERATION HERE.
AND INDICATED THAT ACCORDING TO THE STAFF REPORT, WE MEET
THAT REQUIREMENT OF PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED BY SINGLE-FAMILY
USE AND THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
AREA AND THE PROPOSED HEIGHT IS ALSO COMPATIBLE.
ENCOURAGE FLEXIBLE LAND USES.
TOTAL OF NINE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 14 ARE BEING
PROVIDED WHICH IS UNIQUE.
FREQUENTLY WE ARE IN HERE ASKING FOR WAIVERS OF PARKING.
IN THIS CASE, WE ARE PROVIDING MORE THAN IS REQUIRED.
PROMOTE ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE WITH
LOCATION.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED USES ARE
COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREAS.
PROMOTE MORE DESIRABLE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENTS.
WE MOVE TOWARD MORE WALKABILITY WITH RESPECT TO WORK AT HOME
AND WORK AT WHY YOU ARE RESIDENCE, WE ARE PROVIDING THAT.
WE ARE ONLY TWO BLOCKS NORTH OF ARMATURE WORKS WHICH GIVES
YOU THE IDEA OF THE TYPE OF DENSITY AND PROJECTS IN THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
PROMOTE THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES.
MOST OF THESE ARE BEING REDEVELOPED INTO A COMPATIBLE DESIGN
AND SAYS THAT THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE COMPLIMENTARY TO
THE USE OF THE AREA.
PROMOTE USE OF BUILDING STOCK.
THIS IS AN EXISTING OCCUPIED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE THAT WILL
BE DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE.
SO WE HAVE A COMBINATION OF THINGS BEING REQUESTED.
ONE IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE TO BE REPLACED.
THE SECOND PART OF THAT IS TO ALLOW TOWN HOUSES IN THE REAR,
ACCESSING THE ALLEY WHICH IS ANOTHER PRIORITY AND OBJECTIVE
OF THE CITY.
WE HAVE ENDEAVORED TO MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION.
WE ALSO MET WITH CITY STAFF.
WE MADE SOME MODIFICATIONS WHICH INCREASED THE GREEN SPACE
AND REMOVED TWO OF THE WAIVERS THAT WERE BEING REQUESTED.
AND WE BELIEVE WE HAVE GONE A LONG WAY TOWARD MAKING THIS
THE MOST POSSIBLE, COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WE CAN.
WITHIN TWO BLOCKS, AS I SAID IS ARMATURE WORKS.
THIS CORNER IN HERE OF HIGHLAND AND GOING SOUTH TOWARD
ARMATURE WORKS HAS BEEN A HOT BED OF REDEVELOPMENT OF TOWN
HOUSE PROJECTS.
AND AGAIN THE ALLEY ACCESS WILL BE COMPLETELY IMPROVED TO
ALLOW THAT ACCESS TO OCCUR.
AND ALREADY TWO OTHER PROJECTS THAT WILL ACCESS THE ALLEY TO
THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST OF THIS.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
AND I GUESS THAT'S --
05:57:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSAIN.
05:57:44PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I DID HEAR AND THE STAFF HEARD THAT THE APPLICANT IS
REQUESTING TO CHANGE THINGS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LESSEN THE
WAIVERS, BUT I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR AND AWARE FOR COUNCIL
AND THE APPLICANT TO KNOW THAT IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE
MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN, THAT THESE WILL -- IT WILL
SPARK AND HAVE TO HAVE ANOTHER DRC REVIEWED BY THE WHOLE
ENTIRE STAFF.
KEEP THAT IN MIND, PLEASE.
05:58:11PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WHAT DOES --
05:58:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SHELBY.
05:58:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
COUNCIL HAS IN FRONT OF AND A SITE
PLAN FILED JANUARY 25, 2023.
IS THIS THE SITE PLAN -- IS THIS YOUR PRESENTATION BASED ON
THIS SITE PLAN?
05:58:29PM >> IT IS BASED -- THE STAFF REPORT IS BASED ON THAT SITE
PLAN.
WE MADE MODIFICATIONS SINCE THEN.
AND ACCORDING TO WHAT THE STAFF HAS JUST TOLD ME WE WOULD
PROBABLY BE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO GO BACK TO DRC AND
ALSO TO MAKE ANY OTHER MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY AND GET YOU
AN APPROPRIATE STAFF REPORT AND SITE PLAN.
AND WE DON'T OBJECT TO THAT AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT.
05:58:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
HOW LONG WILL YOU NEED IN ORDER TO DO THIS.
THINKABLE HAS BEEN CONTINUED PREVIOUSLY.
DECEMBER 8 IS WHAT I WAS INFORMED.
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED FOR THAT TO COME BACK TO BE ABLE
TO BE HEARD ON THE DATE TO WHICH IT IS CONTINUED?
05:59:08PM >> LET ME CHECK WITH STAFF AND SEE.
05:59:09PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
05:59:12PM >> STAFF IS INDICATING WE SHOULD BE REQUESTING JUNE.
05:59:29PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU DO AGREE WITH THAT, MR. MICHELINI?
05:59:32PM >> YES.
05:59:34PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO WE HAVE A DATE -- A JUNE DATE.
05:59:36PM >> HAVE TO WAIVE 180 DAYS AND IT WILL BE JUNE -- WHAT?
JUNE 8.
THANK YOU.
05:59:44PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM WHICH IS FILE
NO. REZ-22-65 TO JUNE 8, 5 D 01 P.M.
05:59:58PM >> SECOND.
06:00:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MR. MICHELINI, IT IS YOUR REQUEST THEN TO
GET THE 180-DAY WAIVER TO ALLOW THIS TO BE CONTINUED.
06:00:06PM >> YES, WE WOULD REQUIRE THAT IN ORDER TO GET BACK TO
THE DRC.
06:00:11PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION FOR THE WAIVER.
06:00:15PM >> SECOND.
06:00:16PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK.
06:00:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WAS GOING TO ASK THAT.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER FOUR, FILE NO. REZ-22-65, TO THE CONTINUANCE ONLY.
SEEING NONE, I BELIEVE WE DO HAVE ONE PERSON ON LIEN.
MR. SEEL.
ARE YOU THERE?
DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE CONTINUANCE ONLY?
MR. SEEL?
MR. SEEL?
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
06:01:06PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
06:01:08PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIRMAN, IF YOU DON'T MIND.
I HAVE A QUESTION TO MR. SHELBY AND STAFF.
WE WASTED HOW MANY MINUTES ON THIS?
IS THERE ANY PREREVIEW BEFORE PEOPLE COME TO THIS COUNCIL
AND WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS -- I MEAN I -- I DON'T NEED
MR. MICHELINI.
I AM TALKING TO STAFF.
I MEAN -- THIS IS STARTING TO GET REPETITIVE WITH SOME OF
THESE THINGS HERE.
SOMETHING WE NEED TO BE DOING VERSUS WASTING OUR TIME.
I AM CONFUSED WHAT JUST HAPPENED.
06:01:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS DOCK, WAS ALL OF THIS PLACED ON YOU AND
US TONIGHT?
06:01:43PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES.
LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPLAIN.
THE APPLICANT HAD A DRC MEETING.
THE APPLICANT HAD REQUESTED REVISIONS FROM DRC STAFF.
AT THAT TIME, THOSE REVISIONS WERE MADE.
THE REVISED PLAN WAS SUBMITTED AND THAT IS WHAT THE STAFF
REPORT WAS WRITTEN ON.
THE CHANGES YOU HEAR TODAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS EXPLAINED
THAT THEY MADE TO THE SITE PLAN, STAFF HAD -- YOU KNOW, WE
HAD NOT SEEN THOSE REVISIONS.
THAT CAME UP TODAY.
SO WE HAVE TO HAVE A CHANCE FOR OUR DRC STAFF TO REVIEW THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED, UNLESS IT IS A CHANGE SIMILAR TO A
NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN.
THAT CAN BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
06:02:24PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I JUST HAD TO ASK THE QUESTIONS.
06:02:28PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
WE ARE JUST AS SURPRISED AS YOU ARE BUT WE
ARE HERE TO HELP THE APPLICANT HELP STEVE, BUT HE CAN'T MOVE
FORWARD WITH THOSE CHANGES.
06:02:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:02:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE, FILE NO. REZ-22-125.
06:02:48PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
PROPOSED REJOINING LOCATION 210 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE AND 2702
AND 2706 NORTH MORGAN STREET.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM CI, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND RS-50,
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND SEMI DETACHED.
I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
06:03:16PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD.
ROBLES PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY
LOCATED THREE QUARTERS OF A MILE TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
CLOSEST TRANSIT SITE IS ADJACENT ON WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
WEST COLUMBUS -- COLUMBUS DRIVE IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS
CORRIDOR IDENTIFIED IN IF THE PLANNING AREA AS SUITABLE FOR
REDEVELOPMENT AND INTENSIFICATION.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
SUBJECT SITE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH MORGAN STREET
AND EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
YOU WILL SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA NORTH OF COLUMBUS DRIVE
ALONG MORGAN STREET IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL.
ONE BLOCK WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE
WHICH IS PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
COMMUNITY 35 DESIGNATION A MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORY THAT
ALLOWS TO DEVELOPMENT UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE OR UP
TO A 2.0 F.A.R.
THE NORTHWEST PORTION IS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE IS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, AS
WELL AS ADJACENT TO THE SITE ALONG COLUMBUS DRIVE.
THEN TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS LAND
RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE DESIGNATION.
DUE TO THE SITE BEING WITHIN THE URBAN VILLAGE, THE SUBJECT
SITE IS, I BELIEVE, 5.1.6.
ALLOWS LAND DIVIDED BY MORE THAN ONE LAND CATEGORY TO HAVE
THE FLOOR DENSITY RATIO THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE AND
PERMITTED LAND USES WITHIN THE CATEGORY ARE CONSIDERED
ANYWHERE ON THE SITE THROUGH A PD REZONING.
THE SUBJECT SITE LOCATED ON COLUMBUS DRIVE A TRANSIT
EMPHASIS CORRIDOR SUITABLE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND
INTENSIFICATION.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED DENSITY AND
USES WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE PORTIONS OF SUBJECT SITE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 ARE
CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ADDRESSES THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR
POLICIES PLACING UNITS CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK
AND STREETS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES VEHICULAR
ACCESS FROM AN ALLEY WHICH IS PROVIDED ALONG THE WESTERN
PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FROM THREE GARAGE --
FROM -- FROM THREE GARAGES TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
HOUSING FRONTING EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE PD ADDRESSES THE
MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES OF THE PLAN.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES OF THE PLAN WITH HOUSING
THE CITY'S POPULATION.
TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT
AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO HAVE TAMPA MEET THE NEED OF THE
CURRENT AND FUTURE POPULATION AND GROWTH TO THE URBAN
VILLAGES THAT SUPPORT THIS POLICY DIRECTION LAND PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
URBAN VILLAGE.
BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF
THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:07:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
06:07:11PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY
FIRST.
AS SEE, PROPERTY IS HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY, ZONED RS-50.
RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE.
TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL RS-50.
AND THESE ARE -- A VACANT LOT AND YOU HAVE OFFICES AND
RESIDENTIAL UNITS OVER HERE.
TO THE SOUTH, THESE LOTS ARE ZONED CI.
AND THESE ARE DEVELOPED WITH A CELL TOWER AND ALSO AN AUTO
REPAIR SHOP HERE TO THE SOUTH.
TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE ZONED CI.
YOU HAVE AN AUTO SALES SHOP HERE TO THE WEST.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL DETACHED AND SEMI
DETACHED.
THE PROPERTY AT THIS TIME IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
CONTAIN AS LOT AREA OF 10,780 SQUARE FEET OR .25 ACRES.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TWO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED UNITS AND TWO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI
DETACHED UNITS.
THE TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS 7964 SQUARE FEET.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE.
ON BUILDING C, IS FROM AN ALLEY TO THE WEST.
AND FOR BUILDING A, IT IS FROM NORTH MORGAN STREET.
NORTH MORGAN STREET.
TO THE EAST.
AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO BUILDING B ON EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE
HERE BUILDING C HAVE A THREE-CAR GARAGE ON FIRST LOOK AND
RESIDENCE ON SECOND FLOOR.
EIGHT PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND EIGHT ARE BEING
PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 34 FEET IN HEIGHT.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED
STRUCTURE, THE ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH ELEVATION TO THE NORTH
ELEVATION TO THE WEST.
AND ELEVATION TO THE EAST.
FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED ABOVE IS -- YOU
SEE THE ELEVATION TO THE WEST HERE.
EAST ELEVATION.
NORTH ELEVATION.
AND SOUTH ELEVATION.
FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ELEVATION TO THE
EAST, WEST, SOUTH, AND NORTH.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES, I WILL SHOW YOU
WHAT I SAW.
FIRST IS A -- A PICTURE OF A SITE AS IS, AS IS VACANT AT
THIS TIME.
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN.
I AM ON NORTH MORGAN STREET RIGHT HERE.
YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF A VACANT LOT OF THE PUBLIC NOTICE
SIGN.
I'M HERE AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST COLUMBUS AND NORTH
MORGAN.
THE SITE IS HERE TO YOUR RIGHT SIDE.
IF YOU LOOK DOWN, YOU WILL HAVE AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP TO THE
WEST.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE A VACANT COMMERCIAL
ESTABLISHMENT OR BUILDING.
AND FARTHER ALONG TO THE SOUTHEAST, YOU WILL HAVE A SCHOOL.
THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY WAIVERS FOR THIS CASE.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO REVISION SHEET AND
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READINGS.
ANY QUESTIONS?
06:12:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HUSAIN?
THANK YOU.
06:13:00PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
MY NAME IS MARK BENTLEY, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET, 33602.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN AND PLEASED TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL URBAN
INFILL CONSISTING OF FOUR UNITS.
ONE IS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY
STIPULATION AND CONDITION ON THE SITE PLAN.
THERE ARE APPARENTLY 20 LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM STAKEHOLDERS
IN THE COMMUNITY.
IMMEDIATE RESIDENTS IN THE AREA.
THEY SUPPORT THE PROJECT.
THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT.
AND THE MONDAY PRACTICE IS, IF YOU HAVE SEEN THE LETTERS, IT
WILL MAINTAIN THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF THE
AREA WHICH YOU WILL SEE WHEN RYAN GIVES HIS PRESENTATION.
PRISTINE RESIDENTIAL.
NO COMMERCIAL IN THE AREA AT ALL.
NOT ONLY ARE THE RESIDENTS EXCITED AND EXTREMELY SUPPORTIVE
OF THE PROJECT, WE RECEIVED POSITIVE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM
YOUR STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, ARC STAFF, THE ARC
WHO MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE PD ALONG
WITH THE GENERAL ELEVATIONS THAT ARE PART OF THE PD PROCESS.
AND AS ZAIN INDICATED, THIS PROJECT IS VERY UNIQUE IN AND OF
THAT IT DOES NOT REQUEST ANY WAIVERS OR VARIATIONS.
IN TOTALITY, THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE COMP PLAN AND
KENT WITH ALL -- THE ENTIRE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SO WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, IT IS THE DISCRETION OF COUNCIL IS
A LITTLE CONSTRAINED FROM MY PERSPECTIVE.
BUT IN ANY EVENT, NOTABLY, NOT ONLY HAS STAFF FOUND THE
PROJECT CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE, BUT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
WITH THE PROPOSED TAMPA HEIGHTS CODE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE
WINDING ITS WAY THROUGH THE PROCESS RIGHT NOW.
I BELIEVE IT IS ABOUT TO GO IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
SPECIFICALLY THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
RECOMMENDATIONS ARE MAXIMIZING UTILIZATION OF THE ALLEY AND
IMPROVING THE ALLEY WHICH THE PROJECT WILL HAVE DIRECT
ACCESS FOR PARKING ON ITS ALLEYWAY.
AND ALSO ANOTHER IMPORTANT PART THAT WILL COME UP IN THIS
DISCUSSION I ANTICIPATE LATER ON IS THAT THERE IS A VESTING
PROVISION IN THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGES
DRAFTED BY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS ORGANIZATION THAT BASICALLY
SAYS THAT IF YOU HAVE AN EXISTING LOT AS OF SEPTEMBER 1,
2022, THAT IS CONSIDERED A LEGAL NONCONFORMING LOT.
I WANT TO TALK OF THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY.
TAMPA HEIGHTS LONG HISTORY OF KIND OF GERRYMANDERING AND
SPLITTING OFF THESE LOTS AND RECOMBINING THEM OVER TEAM.
A LOT OF IT PREDATED THE ENACTMENT OF THE CITY'S ZONING
REGULATIONS, SO IT CAN JUST SHOW YOU RIGHT HERE, THIS IS THE
PROPERTY IN QUESTION AND IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS
CONFIGURATION WAS CREATED IN 2007 BY A DIFFERENT PROPERTY
OWNER.
THE THIRD OWNER DOWN THE CHAIN OR DOWN THE STREAM IS OUR
CLIENT.
OUR CLIENT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH RESPECT TO THE CREATION
AND CONFIGURATION OF THESE LOTS.
THERE IS A LOT THAT THE CLIENT OWNED RIGHT HERE AND IN 2020,
I BELIEVE, HE HAD BUILT A HOME AND SOLD IT OFF.
I HAVE THE DATES IN MY NOTES HERE.
SUBSEQUENTLY AFTER THAT SALE, HE PURCHASEDED THIS LOT.
SO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THAT IS THERE WAS NEVER ANY COMMON
OWNERSHIP SIMULTANEOUSLY BETWEEN THIS LOT AND THE LOTS WE
ARE DEALING WITH TONIGHT.
SO THERE WAS NO OPPORTUNITY FOR MERGER OF THE TWO LOTS.
THAT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE CITY DOESN'T ALLOW -- IF THERE
IS COMMON OWNERSHIP OF LOTS, YOU HAVE A NONCONFORMING LOT,
OKAY, AND THE PROPERTY IS UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP, BY
OPERATION OF LAW OR AUTOMATICALLY, THE PROPERTIES MERGE TO
CREATE A MORE CONFORMING LOT.
SO IF THAT SET OF FACTS NEVER EXISTED.
AND I HAVE ALL THE TITLE RESEARCH HERE TO BACK UP AND
SUPPORT WHAT I AM TELLING YOU HERE.
THAT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS LOT WAS ALWAYS INDEPENDENT FROM
THESE.
NOW THE FIRST TIME THIS LOT WAS SPLIT UP WAS IN 1984.
THAT IS WHEN THIS LOT AND ON THE HORIZON, OKAY.
SO THAT IS KIND OF THE HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL AND I HAVE THE
DEEDS AND ALL THAT STUFF AND I ONLY FROM 15 MINUTES AND I
DON'T THINK YOU ARE THAT INTERESTED.
BUT IN ANY EVENT, I WILL SUBMIT THAT INTO THE RECORD.
THE OWNER OF THE LOT THAT I JUST MENTIONED TO YOU HERE THAT
I AM POINTING TO AT ONE POINT IN TIME ASKED OUR CLIENT TO
SELL A PORTION OF OUR CLIENT'S PROPERTY WHERE THE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNIT IS INTENDED; HOWEVER, THAT NEVER OCCURRED,
OBVIOUSLY, AS I MENTIONED, WOULD REQUIRE THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY TO BE NONCONFORMING.
YOU CAN'T SPLIT IT OFF UNDER YOUR CODE.
SO THE LONG AND THE SHORT OF IT WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING
LOT IS OUR CLIENT PURCHASED THE LOT ORIGINATED IN 2007.
THE PURCHASE OCCURRED AFTER THE CLIENT'S SALE OF THE OTHER
LOT TO THE EAST.
SO MERGING OR COMBINING THE LOTS WERE LEGAL POSSIBILITY
UNDER OUR CODE.
THE PD PROCESS IS INTENDED FOR THE UNIQUE SITUATION THAT THE
PROJECT PRESENTS.
THE PD APPROVAL NEEDED AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THIS AREA.
THE PD IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED TAMPA HEIGHTS CODE
CHANGES I MENTIONED IN TERMS OF ALLEY ACCESS AND THE LOT
WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS A LEGAL LOT OF RECORD.
NOW THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION BY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC
ASSOCIATION OF A PREFERENCE OF TRYING TO DICTATE THE USE OF
OUR CLIENT'S PROPERTY.
THEIR PREFERENCE, THEY ARCTIC SLATED WAS A MIXED USE
PROJECT.
SO WHAT WE DID, WE HAD OUR ENGINEER LAY OUT THE COMMERCIAL
PROJECT ON THIS PROPERTY AND ASSUMED MULTIPLE LAYERS
FOR ADA, LANDSCAPING, STORMWATER AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
WEST WE COULD COME UP WITH A 600-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING AND
WOULD BE THE IF AMOUNT OF 2 MILLION.
MAYBE THE SIZE OF SOMEONE'S GARAGE OR LIVING ROOM.
OBVIOUSLY IT IS ECONOMICALLY UNFEASIBLE TO BUILD A
COMMERCIAL PROJECT ON THAT PROPERTY.
NO POINT OF DEVELOPING A MIXED USE PROJECT FOR THE SAKE OF
HAVING A 300-FOOT GIFT SHOP FOR RESIDENTIAL AND
CHARACTERIZING THAT AS MIXED USE.
BOTTOM LINE.
DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AS A PROPERTY OWNER.
NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT BEHIND.
600-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING.
NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR ANY TENANT.
MAYBE A REAL ESTATE AGENT.
SO RIGHT NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO RYAN MANASSE,
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
GO AHEAD, RYAN.
06:20:31PM >> THANK YOU.
06:20:33PM >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE WITH JOHNSON
POPE, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET.
WE ARE HERE TONIGHT TO REPRESENT A GREAT PROJECT THAT
PROVIDES AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HAS 18 LETTER OF SUPPORT OF
THE PROJECT FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
DEMONSTRATES COMPLIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
AND FULL FINDINGS FROM THE DRC, PLANNING COMMISSION AND
RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
COMMISSION.
AND THE PROJECT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY WAIVERS FROM THE CODE.
NOW I WILL BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO THE OVERHEAD.
I WILL SHOW YOU -- WHAT I AM SHOWING HERE IS THE REQUEST
AGAIN, RS-50 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS WHERE THE
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED USES.
JUST TO ORIENT YOU, THE SITE ON SCREEN IS OUTLINED IN GREEN
TO GIVE YOU THAT ORIENTATION -- I LIKE TO CALL IT LIKE
A Z-SHAPED LOT ALMOST.
12-AND-A-HALF-FOOT PLATTED ALLEY TO WEST.
EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST MORGAN TO THE
EAST.
THE OUTLINE SHOW THE UNIQUE SHAPE OF THE PARCEL OR ZONING
LOT WE ARE BRINGING FORWARD FOR THE REQUEST.
CONSTRAINTS ALONG COLUMBUS FROM A RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING FROM
PREVIOUS AND THAT IS BASICALLY SHOWING YOU THE BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY --
06:21:51PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU PLEASE ZOOM IN.
SORRY, IT IS NOT REALLY -- THANK YOU.
06:21:56PM >> LITTLE MORE?
06:21:58PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT IS PERFECT.
06:21:59PM >> GREAT.
I AM SORRY -- LET ME GET MY PAPERS STRAIGHT.
SO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING WAS ALONG THIS -- THAT IS WHY YOU
HAVE THIS SKEWED-IN PROPERTY LINE AND MEANDERING NORTH.
EACH BUILDING IS LABELED AS ZAIN MENTIONED IN HIS REPORT.
BUILDING A, DETACHED DWELLING.
BUILDING B, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ARE SIDE BY
SIDE.
BUILDING C, THREE ENCLOSED PARKING SPACES ON THE GROUND
FLOOR WITH THE SECOND LEVEL BEING THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
DWELLING UNIT.
AGAIN IS -- TO EXPAND ON BUILDING C A CONDITION ON 19 ON THE
SITE PLAN AND WE STATED CRITERIA TO MAKE THAT AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
IT IS DEDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN AS SUCH.
THE APPROVAL WILL ALLOW FOR AN APPROVAL OF FOUR DWELLING
UNITS WHICH MEETS 5.1.6 WHICH ALLOWS THE PROJECT TO WEIGH
THE DENSITY PERMITTED UNDER THE COMMUNITY 35 DESIGNATION ON
THE ENTIRE SITE AND THE PROPOSED REZONING IS NOT REQUESTING
ANY WAIVERS.
THIS REZONING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 27-136 THAT
PROMOTES EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND
INFRASTRUCTURE.
IT ALLOWS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENT LAND USES AND
DENSITIES IN ONE DEVELOPMENT.
PROVIDES A PROCEDURE THAT CAN RELATE TO THE DESIGN, TYPE OF
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO A PARTICULAR SITE, THAT
ACKNOWLEDGES CHANGING NEEDS, ECONOMICS AND CONSUMER
PREFERENCES AND ALLOW FOR INGENUITY AND IMAGINATION IN
PLANNING.
ENCOURAGES FLEXIBLE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION NEEDS.
CONSERVES ENERGY AND MAXIMIZE THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL
RESOURCES, OPEN SPACE, GREEN SPACE, AND HISTORICAL SITES,
WHICH THIS IS IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT.
PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT WHEN APPROPRIATE IN
LOCATION, COMPATIBLE OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD,
BUILT-IN ENVIRONMENT AND EXIST GOINGOGRAPHY THAT PROMOTES A
MORE DESIRABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT.
AS SHOWN IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, DRC STAFF CONCURS AND THE
PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS AND CRITERIA ACROSS THE BOARD.
I KNOW ZAIN WENT THROUGH THIS ELEVATION SLIDE AND GUILT
THROUGH IT BRIEFLY.
TOP IS BUILDING B, SEMI-DETACHED USE.
THE MIDDLE BEING BUILDING C FOR PARKING -- SORRY FOR PARKING
ON THE GROUND LEVEL AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING UNIT --
06:24:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THIS IS COMPLETELY UNVIEWABLE.
06:24:38PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
IT IS VERY, VERY --
06:24:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
VERY FAINT.
WE CAN'T SEE ANY OUTSIDE LINES AT ALL.
06:24:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I THINK THE PRINTER RAN OUT OF INK.
06:24:49PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING.
IF YOU LOOK UP AT THE SCREEN, YOU WILL SEE WHAT I AM TALKING
ABOUT.
06:24:54PM >> DOES COUNCIL HAVE A SITE PLAN THAT WAS TURNED IN FROM
STAFF.
06:25:01PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WOULD YOU LIKE FOR ONE TO PUT ON THE
OVERHEAD.
06:25:05PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I AM SORRY --
06:25:06PM >> NO PROBLEM.
AS MY TIME IS RUNNING, CAN I HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME?
06:25:19PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SURE.
MIGHT BE TOO BIG NOW.
LET'S SEE.
06:25:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
MUCH BETTER.
06:25:38PM >> I WILL ROLL THROUGH THEM.
OKAY.
TOP IS BUILDING B, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
MIDDLE -- IF WE CAN SCROLL UP TO THIS ONE.
THIS IS GOING TO BE BUILDING C FOR THE PARKING ON THE GROUND
LEVEL.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLING ABOVE.
THE BOTTOM ELEVATION IS BUILDING A, WHICH IS A SINGLE-FAMILY
SEMI DETACHED.
MIGHT BE BENEFICIAL IF WE HAND YOU THE SITE PLAN AND YOU CAN
SEE IT FROM WHAT WAS TURNED IN TOO IF YOU WANT TO CIRCULATE
THAT.
IF YOU WANT TO HAND IT UP TO THEM.
THESE ELEVATION ALSO HAVE TO GO BACK -- EVEN THOUGH WE HAD A
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM THE REZONING FROM THE ARC.
THEY WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE ARC FOR FURTHER CERTIFICATE
OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATIONS.
CAN YOU SEE THE SANBORN MAP ON SCREEN?
06:26:30PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:26:30PM >> THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN GREEN ON THE SANBORN MAP IS
BETWEEN TWO CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES SHOWN ON MAP.
THIS RE-ESTABLISHES STRUCTURES THAT ARE IN CHARACTER WHAT
WAS PREVIOUSLY BUILT ON-SITE, THE TAMPA HEIGHTS HISTORIC
DISTRICT, ADJACENT CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES AND THE OVERALL
HISTORIC CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE LOTS ARE CURRENTLY VACANT AND UNDEVELOPED THAT DOES NOT
HELP WITH THE NEEDS OF TAMPA AND CONTRIBUTE TO THE HISTORIC
ENVIRONMENT.
THIS IS -- THIS SLIDE IS FROM THE TAMPA HEIGHTS GUIDELINES
OF MASSING AND FORM TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE
TAMPA HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT.
NEW BUILDINGS SHOULD HAVE SIMILAR MASSING AND FORM TO THE
NEIGHBORING BUILDINGS.
REGARDING OUR PROPOSED REZONING, STRUCTURES SHOWING MASSING
THAT IS IN FORM AND REFLECTED OF ITS NEIGHBORS WITHOUT
REPLICATING THEM.
AND AGAIN FROM THE TAMPA HEIGHTS GUIDELINES, THE PROPOSED
BUILDINGS ARE SIMILAR IN HEIGHT AND WIDTH WITH BUILDINGS ON
ADJACENT LOTS.
AGAIN JUST TO POINT OUT, THE ARC VOTED 11-7-22 TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REQUEST WITH NO CONDITIONS.
THESE ARE JUST A FEW RENDERINGS OF THE BUILDING THAT OUR
CLIENT WAS ABLE TO SUPPLY.
OBVIOUSLY AGAIN IT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH ARC REVIEW AND
APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS, BUT BUILDING A,
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
THIS WILL BE BUILDING B, WHICH IS THAT SEMI-DETACHED.
TWO UNITS ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT.
AND THEN BUILDING C, WHICH IS THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT
WE ARE STIPULATING THROUGH THE PD ABOVE THE THREE ENCLOSED
GARAGE SPACES.
06:28:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:28:21PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "AFFORDABLE HOUSING?"
WHAT IS THE AMI.
06:28:26PM >> 80 TO 120 AMI.
SITE PLAN FOR DURATION OF TIME AND TERM WHICH IS REFLECTIVE
OF THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT ACCORDING TO THE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
06:28:39PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THIS WILL BE A RENTAL PROPERTY.
NOT A PURCHASABLE PROPERTY.
06:28:43PM >> CORRECT.
THIS WILL BE TIED -- BECAUSE THE WAY THE SITE IS LAID OUT,
THE UNIT 1 AND 2, THE SEMI-DETACHED, THIS WILL BE THE
STRUCTURE ABOVE THEIR PARKING.
AND IT WILL BE RENTABLE FOR -- ACCORDING TO STIMULATIONS ON
THE NOTE IN THE SITE PLAN.
06:29:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT STIPULATION IS ONLY FIVE YEARS.
06:29:02PM >> CORRECT.
THAT IS -- THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR US TO PROVIDE THAT,
BUT THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO PROVIDE THAT.
WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR A DENSITY BONUS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT
THAT TYPICALLY YOU SEE WITH REZONING PROJECTS.
THEY TRY TO GET A DENSITY BONUS BY PROVIDING AFFORDABLE
HOUSE.
YOU LOOK AT IT, FOUR UNITS, ONE OF THOSE WILL BE AFFORDABLE.
BASIC MATH IS 25%.
THE CODE WILL GIVE YOU A BONUS.
WE DON'T NEED THAT BONUS BUT PROVIDING IT BECAUSE A GOOD
PROJECT AND HELPS OUT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
06:29:33PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
06:29:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:29:37PM >> CAN I --
06:29:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PLEASE CONTINUE.
06:29:39PM >> SO ON SCREEN, THIS YELLOW SHADED AREA -- EVERYBODY CAN
SEE THIS?
OKAY.
THE YELLOW-SHADED AREA SHOWN IS THE SUBJECT SITE WITH WHITE
BEING CHURCHES OR SCHOOLS.
THE BLUE-SHADED AREA ARE NONRESIDENTIAL USES AND BLUE SHADED
ARE USES AND ZONES.
ALL USES TO THE EAST PLATTED ALLEY ARE RESIDENTIAL.
JUST TO POINT OUT AND INJECTING SOME OTHER TYPE OF USE WILL
BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND
THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT OF THAT BLOCK.
WHAT I AM SAYING THERE, IF YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING EAST OF
THIS ALLEY, THIS BLUE CONTINUES ON AND SOUTHEAST AS WELL
WITH RESIDENTIAL.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FURTHER ENHANCES THE RESIDENTIAL
CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND MAINTAINS THE HISTORY OF
THIS CORNER BY REVIVING THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS IN SIMILAR
LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE SANBORN MAP I PREVIOUSLY SHOWED
YOU.
ALL STAFF REVIEWING AGENCIES FOUND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT
WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AS WELL AS THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE PROJECT SUPPORTS THE GROWING NEEDS OF RESIDENTIAL INFILL
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA BY PROVIDING DIFFERENT
TYPES OF HOUSING OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING THROUGH A PD ADDITION
ON THE SITE PLAN.
PROPOSED REZONING IS NOT REQUESTING ANY WAIVERS OR
REQUESTING A BONUS PROVISION FOR INCREASED DENSITY AS I
STATED LIKE YOU SEE ON SOME REZONINGS, TRYING TO GET MORE
DENSITY.
IT MEETS SEVERAL POLICIES FROM THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND MARK AND I ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
06:31:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTION FOR THE PETITIONERS?
ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO FILE NO.
REZ-22-125?
06:31:32PM >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
I AM HERE REPRESENTING JOSH TABBY WHO IS THE OWNER
IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS PROJECT.
AND WE HAVE VOICED OUR CONCERNS WITH THE APPLICANT.
WE HAD A ZOOM MEETING WITH THEM AS WELL.
AND EVERYTHING THAT I AM GOING TO SAY TO YOU THIS EVENING
HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPRESSED TO THEM.
ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENTS IS THAT IN THE PD
CRITERIA, SAYS TO PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE
OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE WITH CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF
POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS.
AND I WILL SHOW YOU WHAT THE POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT IS.
AND, AGAIN, WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH -- WITH THE
APPLICANT AS WELL.
DO I NEED TO MOVE THAT UP.
06:32:29PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO, DOWN.
06:32:30PM >> MR. TABBY OWN THIS PROPERTY, AND AS MR. BENTLEY
REFERENCED EARLIER, THIS SECTION IS WHERE THEY ARE PROPOSING
A PARKING GARAGE AND A SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT.
THEY ARE ALSO PROPOSING A CONNECTION TEN FEET WIDE BE
ALLOWED BETWEEN THE PROPERTY ON COLUMBUS DRIVE, WHICH WE
REALLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ANYTHING ON COLUMBUS DRIVE.
THE ISSUE IS OUTIZING THIS LOT WHICH IS A NONCONFORMING LOT.
THEY REFERENCED IN THE FUTURE IT MIGHT BE CONFORMING THROUGH
A CODE AMENDMENT.
CURRENTLY IT IS NONCONFORMING.
IT WAS DONE DELIBERATELY.
I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHO DID IT, BUT LET ME SHOW YOU
VISUALLY WHAT THAT IS.
THIS PROPERTY HERE IS TABBY'S PROPERTY.
THIS PROPERTY HERE IS WHERE THEY PROPOSED A PARKING GARAGE
AND A SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT.
I CAN'T IMAGINE HOW THAT -- HOW THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED TO BE
ANYTHING OTHER THAN AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON TEBBY HERE.
ONE OF THE OTHER PROVISIONS -- AND I AM GOING BACK TO THE
LAND USE PROVISION THAT WAS CITED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
IT SAYS, DUE TO THE URBAN VILLAGE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS
ELIGIBLE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR -- IT DOESN'T SAYS IT
CONSIDERED SAYS IT MAY BE ELIGIBLE.
MY CONVENTION IS THAT THE COUNCIL -- UP TO YOU ALL TO DECIDE
WHETHER OR NOT IT IS ELIGIBLE FOR THE INCREASED DENSITY TO
BLEND THOSE -- THE NONCONFORMING LOT WITH THE CONFORMING
LOTS THAT THEY HAVE ON COLUMBUS DRIVE.
IT ALSO SAYS THAT YOU SHALL WEIGH THE FLOOR AREA DENSITY
OVER THE ENTIRE SITE.
AND I WOULD OFFER TO YOU THAT IT HAS NO DENSITY PROVISION.
IT IS NONCONFORMING.
IT WAS CREATED DELIBERATELY.
THEY HAVE CREATED THEIR OWN HARDSHIP AND TRANSFERRING THE
PARKING AND THE TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED WITH THAT PROJECT ON TO
THE ALLEY THAT IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO MY CLIENT'S
PROPERTY.
IT SAYS, AGAIN, THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOOD.
I THINK THEY HAVE BEEN FOCUSING ON COLUMBUS DRIVE AND NOT ON
THIS OUTPARCEL IN THE BACK.
AND THAT IS A KEY ELEMENT.
THEIR PROJECT DOESN'T WITHOUT THIS UTILIZATION PARKING
COMING OFF THE STREET AND THEN TAKING IT -- A TEN-FOOT-WIDE
ACCESS POINT BETWEEN THOSE TWO PROPERTIES.
AND I WOULD ASK YOU -- LET ME SHOW YOU ON THE SITE PLAN
HERE.
06:35:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
30 SECONDS.
06:35:15PM >> SHOW YOU ON THE SITE PLAN.
THEY ARE TALKING OF A WALKWAY HERE IN THE BACK YARD
ESSENTIALLY OF THIS PROPERTY WHICH IS A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE.
IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THEY COME BACK, CHANGE THEIR PLANS
PUT THE PARK WHERE IT BELONGS OFF OF COLUMBUS DRIVE AND NOT
USE THAT INTO THE REAR ANOTHER ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE.
06:35:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TO ITEM NUMBER 5,
FILE NO. REZ-22-125.
SEEING NONE MR. SEEL, ARE YOU WITH US?
06:35:54PM >> YES, I AM.
MR. CHAIRMAN.
CAN YOU HEAR ME THIS TIME?
I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN.
06:36:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN, PLEASE.
[SWEARING IN]
06:36:19PM >> I DO.
06:36:19PM >>CLERK:
THANK YOU.
06:36:22PM >> THANK YOU.
I WOULD LIKE TO NOTE THAT I WAS ONLINE ON THE PRIOR AGENDA
ITEM BUT WAS MUTED BY STAFF.
SO I HAVE BEEN HERE.
DEAR TAMPA CITY COUNCIL, THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION
UNANIMOUSLY OPPOSED FILE NO. REZ-22-125 AND ASK THAT YOU
DENY THIS APPLICATION.
FIRST, MR. BENTLEY IS IN NO POSITION TO ARTICULATE THE
INTENT AND CONTENTS OF THE TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT.
HE PUBLICLY OPPOSED THE PROCESS AND REFUSED TO DISCUSS THIS
COMMUNITY DRIVEN INITIATIVE WITH US.
THE NEW COUNTERARGUMENT OF THE UNVIABLE OF COMMERCIAL USES
IGNORES THE PARKING MINIMUMS IN THE DISTRICT WHICH WILL
ALLOW FOR A LARGER COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE TO BE BUILT.
FURTHERMORE, UNDERSTAND HOW ALLEYS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE USE IS
INCORRECT AND THE INSERTION OF THIS VESTING NONCONFORMING
LOTS.
THE HIGH QUANTITY OF PROPERTY OWNERS WHO SUPPORT THIS
PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR
VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AS WELL.
BOTH PROPERTIES FRONTING COLUMBUS DRIVE ARE ZONED CI,
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE WITH A FUTURE LAND USE OF CC-35.
IT IS INTENDED TO BE BUILT FOR COMMERCIAL OR MIXED AUTO US.
THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
IN 2003 CALLS FOR THIS AREA COLUMBUS DRIVE, AROUND TAMPA
STATE AND FLORIDA AVENUE INTERSECTIONS TO BE A THRIVING
MIXED-USE TOWN CENTER.
THE FACT THAT THE EXISTING LAND ZONING STEPPED DOWN FROM CI
TO RS-50 AND R-10 RESPECTIVELY EAST OF MORGAN STREETS HOLD
THE INTENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.
THIS IS NOT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE INTENDED UNDER THESE
THREE PLANNING DOCUMENTS.
A DETRIMENTAL ACTION OF WALKABILITY.
WE HAVE SEEN AN EMOTION OF COMMERCIALLY-ZONED PROPERTY TO
COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS TURNED RESIDENTIAL ONLY.
AS THEY BECOME FURTHER FAR APART, THEY DO NOT BECOME
WALKABLE.
COUNCIL SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THESE PRACTICES ARE COUNTER TO
THE CITY'S ZERO VISION GOAL.
THEY DO NOT NOTE THAT A WAIVER IS REQUIRED FROM CITY CODE
22-2829-C-1, SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGNED THAT READ THE GROUND
FLOOR ENTRANCES FOR FRONT DOORS TO DWELLING UNITS SHOULD
FACE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, NOT INCLUDING ALLEYS.
THE NORTHERNMOST LOT CONTAINS AN UNIT ABOVE THE GARAGES WHICH
IS NOTED AS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED ON THE REZONING PLANS.
IN TALKING WITH STAFF, THEY HAVE ALLOWED THE GARAGE
APARTMENT OR CONDO BEING BUILT ABOVE THE GARAGE TO BE
CLASSIFIED AS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
THAT IS HOW THE CODE WAS TWISTED TO AVOID THE WAIVER.
ALLOWING THIS SETS A SERIOUS PRECEDENT TO HOW THAT CAN BE
INTERPRETED.
I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO ADD THE FIRST ITERATION OF THIS PROJECT
WAS A SPECIAL USE-1 WAS DENIED BY THE ARC.
THEY DENIED THE CASE IN APRIL OF 2022 FOR REASONS
INCONSISTENCY OF SITE ORIENTATION AND MASSING AND TIED TO
SPECIAL USE SU1-22-22.
BECAUSE IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT THE ARC APPROVAL, THEY
PIVOTED TO TO PURSUE A REZONING; HOWEVER, SKEET PLAN DID NOT
CHANGE SUBSTANTIALLY NOR COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF COLUMBUS DRIVE.
THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AT 212 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE IS
ORIENTED THE SAME WAY AS PRIOR AND TAKES UP A SIMILAR MASS
WITH THE SMALL CHANGE OF THE ADDITION OF A WRAP-AROUND
PORCH.
THE ARCHITECTURE IS ORIENTED TOWARD MORGAN AND MOST OTHER
ADJACENT STRUCTURES ORIENTED TOWARD COLUMBUS.
THE ARC'S RECENT APPROVAL OF THIS REZ IS NOT ONLY BAFFLING
BUT INCONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUS RULING AND SHOULD NOT BE
THE BASIS FOR REZONING APPROVAL.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
I AM BRIAN SEEL WITH THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
06:40:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SEEL.
PETITIONER.
REBUTTAL.
06:40:34PM >> JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS, COUNCILMEMBERS.
I DON'T WANT TO GO TIT FOR TAT.
NO POINT.
THE BIG PICTURE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL, I THINK, PROBLEM THAT
THE ASSOCIATION HAS IS THE USE OF THE PROPERTY.
AND I THINK YOU ARE AWARE THAT AN ENTIRE CITY BLOCK HAS
RECENTLY BEEN APPROVED WITH A PLAN AMENDMENT TO UMU-60 FOR A
REAL LEGITIMATE MIXED AUTO US PROJECT.
I THINK, RYAN, YOU HAVE GOT THAT, DON'T YOU?
SO THAT IS GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS HERE.
YOU MIGHT HAVE SEEN THE TBO NEWS ARTICLE.
YOU GUYS WERE PRETTY INVOLVED IN THIS AS WELL.
SO THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THIS MIXED USE PROJECT,
10,000 SQUARE FEET KIND OF MEANDERING ITS WAY BETWEEN
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
WITH RESPECT TO THIS COMMENT THAT WE OPPOSE TAMPA HEIGHTS
PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS, WE NEVER TAKEN A
POSITION.
THEY HAVE NEVER REACHED OUT TO US EVEN THOUGH THEY
REPRESENTED WE WOULD.
WE DON'T HAVE A POSITION.
WHAT MARK BENTLEY THINKS IS -- THE POINT IS WHEN SPEAKING OF
THE INTENT, IT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.
IF IT SAYS THOU SHALL USE THE ALLEY AND IMPROVE THE ALLEY.
THAT IS WHAT IT SAYS.
I TOLD CITY COUNCIL
WE ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT HAS BEEN ADVOCATED IN THE PROPOSED
REGULATIONS.
IN TERMS OF CONFIRMATION OF THE PERSONS IN SUPPORT, WE
SUBMITTED LETTERS IN SUPPORT WITH THEIR ADDRESSES.
SO YOU CAN EASILY GET ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WEB SITE AND
CONFIRM THAT.
MR. SEEL IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE PROCESS.
SO, YOU KNOW, I AM SURPRISED HE WOULD BRING THAT POINT UP.
HE ALSO SAID WE NEED THE CITY STAFF TO OVERLOOK SOMETHING
AND WE ACTUALLY NEEDED A WAIVER FOR BUILDING C; HOWEVER, NO
DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNDER YOUR CODE.
SO THAT IS FALSE.
HE TALKS ABOUT THE ARC CASE.
HE SAID HE WAS BAFFLED BY THAT.
WE WENT TO THE ARC.
THEY SPENT A LOT OF TIME REVIEWING IT AND MADE A
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
YOU APPROVED THE REZONING, ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED
ELEVATIONS, WHICH ARE JUST GENERALIZED AND WE HAVE TO GO
BACK IN FRONT OF THE A, C, AND GET INTO THE DETAILS.
SOME COUNTY THINGS THAT APPARENTLY MR. SEEL WERE CONCERNED
ABOUT.
WITH RESPECT TO MR. MICHELINI, I THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING
IN ITEM NUMBER 4, HE WAS A GREAT ADVOCATE FOR THE ALLEY AND
USING THE ALLEY AND ACCESS TO THE ALLEY AND ALL THAT.
IN THIS CASE I GUESS IT IS DIFFERENT.
A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, SINCE HE HAS A CLIENT WHO WANTS TO
REPRESENT.
BUT IT DOES MEET THE PD CRITERIA.
YOU HAVE TWO PROFESSIONAL STAFFS WEIGH IN SAYING IT EXACTLY
MEETS THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
WITH RESPECT TO THE LOT, R, HE CALLED IT A SERIES OF LOTS.
ONE COHESIVE NONCONFORMING LOT.
NOTHING WE CAN DO WITH IT.
WE DIDN'T CREATE IT.
MY CLIENT DIDN'T CREATE IT.
IT HAS TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE PRESENT FORM.
HOW DO YOU DO THAT?
THIS UNIQUE MATTER THAT WE DID.
WE MAXIMIZE THE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT AND THERE IS A NEED OF
HOUSE IN THAT AREA AND WE ARE TRYING TO FULFILL THAT NEED.
HE SAID THE WALKWAY DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
HAVING A WALKWAY IS NO DIFFERENCE THAN HAVING A WALKWAY AT
YOUR HOUSE TO YOUR GARAGE.
THAT IS HOW IT FUNCTIONS.
NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT THAT.
SO IN SUMMARY, WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL CODE AND
REGULATIONS PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF YOUR PROFESSIONAL
PLANNING STAFFS.
NO WAIVERS HAVE BEEN SOUGHT, AN ALL STAFF AND THE ARC
HAVE FOUND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY COS,
CONSISTENT POLICIES IN THE COMP PLAN.
AND AS I EXPLAINED EARLY ON, THE NUMEROUS STAKEHOLDERS THAT
KIND OF REACHED OUT TO US AND IT WASN'T DIFFICULT.
A LOT OF THESE NEIGHBORS WERE EXCITE AND AND WE DIDN'T HAVE
TO TWIST ANY ARMS TO GET THE 20 LETTERS IN SUPPORT OR THE
19.
THEY RENDERED THEIR REPORT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING IT WOULD
BE A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
I THINK I MADE IT CLEAR TO YOU THAT IT IS VIRTUALLY
IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE A LEGITIMATE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON
THIS PROPERTY IF YOU TRY TO MEET ADA, BUFFERING, STORMWATER,
ET, IT WON'T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF THE CONFIGURATION OF THE
PROPERTY AND IT REALLY DOESN'T MAKE ECONOMIC SENSE.
WITH THAT BEING -- WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE WOULD
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PROJECT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL CERTAINLY TRY TO ANSWER
THEM.
THANK YOU VERY.
06:45:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:45:35PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WHEN IS IT YOUR CLIENTS PURCHASE THIS
PROPERTY?
06:45:40PM >> IN 2020 -- IT'S IN MY NOTES.
MAY OF -- WELL, TWO PROPERTIES.
THE ONE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE ZONING LOT, MAY 2020.
A WEEK AFTER HE -- HE SOLD THE OTHER LOT ON MAY 20, 2020,
OKAY, THEN ACQUIRED THIS LOT A WEEK LATER.
SO IS THE LOT TO THE EAST THAT MR. MICHELINI'S CLIENT
REPRESENTS, MY CLIENT IS THE DEVELOPER.
HE BUILT A HOME.
SOLD IT TO THAT GENTLEMAN ON MAY 20.
AND THEN THIS PROPERTY BECAME AVAILABLE AND HE CLOSED ON IT
RIGHT AWAY THE FOLLOWING WEEK.
06:46:20PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU PLEASE PUT UP THE SITE PLAN?
06:46:25PM >> OKAY.
06:46:26PM >> THEY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SEE IT.
06:46:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THE SMALLER ONE IS FINE.
HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DO IT.
SO YOU HAVE AN ALLEY THERE, RIGHT?
06:46:50PM >> CORRECT.
06:46:51PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THEN YOU HAVE THIS BUILDING ABOVE THE GARAGE.
HOW DO THOSE PEOPLE REACH THE STREET?
06:47:00PM >> REACH THIS STREET?
06:47:01PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
HOW DO THEY REACH COLUMBUS?
06:47:05PM >> THEY WOULD REACH THROUGH THE ALLEY AND HAVE THE
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY WOULD BE HERE.
06:47:09PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
IS THAT ALLEY USED RIGHT NOW?
06:47:12PM >> YES.
06:47:12PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HOW WIDE IS IT?
06:47:14PM >> PLATTED AT 12 AND A HALF FEET.
06:47:16PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
BECAUSE MY BIGGEST QUESTION ABOUT ALL OF THIS
IS WHERE DOES THIS PERSON PUT OUT THEIR GARBAGE?
06:47:25PM >> THIS ONE RIGHT HERE?
THAT WILL BE FURTHER REVIEWED BY SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT AT
PERMITTING.
WHETHER THEY PULL THEIR CANS OUT -- NOT A SOLID WASTE
ENCLOSURE.
SO ALL THESE UNITS WOULD HAVE TYPICAL PRIVATE -- EVERYBODY
WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY, THE CART ROLLOUT.
06:47:40PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PUT THEIR GARBAGE.
06:47:44PM >> SORRY -- I KEEP -- WHERE SOLID WASTE WOULD DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT THEY GO DOWN THE ALLEY OR -- I AM ASSUMING
DOWN THE ALLEY.
SOLID WASTE IS A DEPARTMENT THAT WILL REVIEW THAT AT
PERMITTING AND THEY DETERMINE WHAT THEIR TRUCKS AND WHERE
THEIR TRUCK WILL SERVICE.
06:48:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I DON'T KNOW IF A GARBAGE TRUCK CAN MAKE IT
DOWN A 12-FOOT ALLEY.
06:48:06PM >> IT HAS HAPPENED -- IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW UP AND DOWN
THE ALLEY.
I WILL SHOW YOU AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.
06:48:14PM >> IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY SOLID WASTE FOR ZONING AND THEY
FOUNT IT CONSISTENT AS WELL.
06:48:19PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I DON'T BELIEVE GARBAGE IS COLLECTED ON THAT
ALLEY.
06:48:22PM >> MISS HURTAK, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, YOUR SOLID WASTE
DEPARTMENT SAID THEY APPROVED THE PROJECT AND SAID IT IS
ACCEPTABLE.
SO -- HERE IS THE ALLEY.
06:48:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I AM JUST SAYING.
OKAY, THANK YOU.
06:48:43PM >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
06:48:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
I NEED TO ASK A QUESTION OF STAFF, PLEASE.
MR. HUSAIN, DO YOU KNOW HOW THIS LOT BECAME NONCONFORMING
AT WHAT TIME IT BECAME NONCONFORMING?
06:49:10PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
AS THE APPLICANT BOUGHT IT IN 2020 AS I
UNDERSTAND, THE LOT TO THE NORTHWEST IS HAVING THIS PD TO
HAVE THIS BE A LOT.
06:49:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
BUT I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT -- THAT LOT HAD TO BE
NONCONFORMING FOR YEARS BEFORE THE APPLICANT BOUGHT IT.
DO YOU KNOW WHEN IT BECAME NONTO CONFORM SOMETHING IN.
06:49:34PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
I DO NOT KNOW THE YEAR, NO, SIR.
06:49:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:49:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MR. CHAIRMAN --
06:49:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I AM TRYING FIGURE OUT IF IT IN
NONCONFORMING EVEN BEFORE THE PURCHASER WAS CONSIDERING
BUYING IT, HOW DID IT BECOME THAT WAY.
AND WHY WASN'T IT RETAKEN INTO OTHER LOTS THAT ARE AROUND IT
OR THAT ONE LOT.
MR. BENTLEY.
06:50:05PM >> I AM NOT GOING TO SOLVES THE RIDDLE HERE.
THESE LOTS GO BACK AND FORTH.
THIS TECH LOT BECAME THIS CONFIGURATION IN 2007.
THEN IT WAS SOLD AGAIN AND THEN SOLD TO MY CLIENT.
SO IT IS NONCONFORMING WITH RESPECT TO OBVIOUSLY FRONTAGES
AND THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT WITH RESPECT TO SIZE, IT EXCEEDS
THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT APPLY TO
IT.
SO IT HAS HAS NONCONFORMING CHARACTERISTICS IS WHAT I WOULD
SAY.
06:50:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. BENTLEY, I AM NOT GIVING TESTIMONY AND I
AM NOT TRYING TO.
BUT A RHETORICAL QUESTION.
AT SOME POINT IN SOME TIME, SOME SURROUNDING LOT WAS BOUGHT
AND SOLD AND CUT AND THAT IS HOW THIS LITTLE CHUNK BECAME
NONCONFORMING.
MR. BENTLEY, I AM NOT TRYING TO GIVE EVIDENCE, BUT AT SOME
POINT IN TIME, EITHER THAT LOT GETS ABSORBED INTO ANOTHER
PROPERTY OR IT IS GOING TO HAVE TO STAY NONCONFORMING UNTIL
WE HAVE ANOTHER LAND USE POLICY.
JUST MAKING A STATEMENT.
06:51:15PM >> I KNOW.
THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE PD PROCESS, THANK GOD.
OKAY.
06:51:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:51:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF I CAN FOLLOW UP ON THAT.
MR. BENTLEY OR STAFF, CAN YOU TELL US IF YOU COULDN'T
CONNECT THOSE PROPERTIES, WHAT COULD YOU DO WITH THAT
NONCONFORMING PROPERTY.
YOU COULDN'T BUILD ANYTHING THERE?
06:51:37PM >> ASSUMING -- JUST FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES THEY ARE A LEGAL
NONCONFORMING LOTS, YEAH, YOU COULD.
YOU CAN BUILD ON ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
TONIGHT.
THE HICCUP IS, WHERE DO YOU PUT THE PARKING FOR THE MIDDLE
LOT, OKAY.
AND THIS IS WHAT WE ARE STRUGGLING WITH WHEN WE CAME UP WITH
THIS CREATIVE DESIGN.
LET'S PUT IT ON THE LOT ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY AND LET THEM
WALK WITH THOSE TWO UNITS.
06:52:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SORRY, YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER IF YOU DON'T
WANT TO ANSWER A HYPOTHETICAL.
THAT ONE NONCONFORMING PART WITHOUT ANY WAIVERS, WHAT COULD
YOU BUILD RIGHT NOW IF IT IS A SEPARATE SPOT.
06:52:14PM >> UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING AND WE ARE ON SAME PAGE AS THE
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LOT, I GUESS YOU COULD -- AGAIN, I AM
LAWYER, NOT A PLANNER, BUT I GUESS YOU COULD -- IT APPEARS
THAT YOU CAN DEVELOP SOME TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL ON THAT
PROPERTY.
BUT RYAN, WOULD YOU AGREE WITH THAT?
06:52:32PM >> THE CODE ADDRESSES AND MAYBE STAFF CONFIRMS IT, BUT THE
CODE ADDRESSES NONCONFORMING LOTS AND GO THROUGH THAT VERY
VIEW.
JUST MAKE ONE QUICK STATEMENT, THE ONLY PROCESS THAT THIS
PROJECT CAN GO THROUGH IS THIS PD REZONING PROCESS.
THAT IS WHY THE PD IS IN PLACE FOR THE ODDLY UNIQUE KNEE
SHAPED LOTS.
HE THINKS WE ARE TALKING A LOT OF HYPOTHETICAL, BUT WHEN IT
BOILS DOWN TO IT, IT IS ONE ZONING LOT.
06:53:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE QUESTION.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IF THAT LOT WAS SEPARATE OR CONNECTED
TO THIS IS ONLY THE TEN-FOOT PATHWAY.
WOULD THAT BE CORRECT.
THEY CAN BUILD THE EXACT SAME BUILDING THEY ARE PROPOSING
BUT THE ONLY DEFENSE BECAUSE THEY ARE CONNECTED WITH A
TEN-FOOT PATHWAY.
06:53:19PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN.
UPON THAT REQUEST, WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN
AND MAY NEED WAIVERS.
MAY NEED SOMETHING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A STRUCTURE ON THAT
LOT.
THAT NONCONFORMING LOT.
06:53:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
06:53:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:53:37PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
ZAIN?
06:53:40PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
YES.
06:53:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WHY -- COULD THERE BE PARKING -- COULD THERE
BE PARKING FROM COLUMBUS TO THOSE ATTACHED UNITS?
06:54:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
SORRY, WRONG PERSON.
TRANSPORTATION.
06:54:03PM >>JONATHAN SCOTT:
JONATHAN SCOTT, TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING.
YOU COULD GET ACCESS OFF COLUMBUS, JUST THAT UNIQUE
PROPERTY, YOU KNOW, BUT THEY COULD COME OFF THERE AND GET
ACCESS IF THEY WANTED TO.
06:54:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, SO IT IS POSSIBLE.
06:54:20PM >> YEAH, IT IS POSSIBLE.
IT WOULDN'T BE IDEAL, BUT, YES.
06:54:23PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
BUT IT IS POSSIBLE.
THANK YOU.
06:54:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
06:54:30PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
06:54:31PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
06:54:32PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT TO GIVE MR. BENTLEY -- MR.
BENTLEY, DO YOU WANT ANY LAST WORDS AS A RESULT OF THOSE
COMMENTS.
06:54:39PM >> NO, I THINK I WORN OUT MY WELCOME.
06:54:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
YES.
06:54:55PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, I MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENT FOR FIRST
READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE
GENERAL VICINITY OF 210 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE AND 2702 AND
2706 NORTH MORGAN STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
TECHNICALLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION CI, COMMERCIAL INCENTIVE AND RS-50
RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, DETACHED AND SEMI DETACHED
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
06:55:27PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
06:55:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
06:55:37PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:55:41PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.
06:55:44PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:55:46PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
06:55:49PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
06:55:51PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NO.
06:55:54PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO.
06:55:54PM >>CLERK:
MOTION PASSED WITH HURTAK, MANISCALCO, CITRO VOTING
NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
06:56:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:56:19PM >> THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM -- AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX, FILE NO. REZ-22-87.
06:56:30PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU SO MUCH CHAIRMAN CITRO AND
COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 1200 NORTH
WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
THE APPLICANT IS REPRESENTED BY CAMI CORBETT.
FROM OP-1 OFFICE PROFESSIONAL AND M-AP-1 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
TO PD FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, FAMILY, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT
-- THE RESTAURANT HAD NOT BEEN ON YOUR LIST.
THERE IS A CORRECTION.
RESTAURANT WILL BE USED TO THIS MENTIONED-USE PROJECT.
TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND I WILL COME BACK
AND GIVE MY REPORT.
THANK YOU.
06:57:21PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THIS WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT.
THE WEST SHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, IN
THE TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA.
CHARLES B. WILLIAMS PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATION FACILITY
ONE MILE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
TRANSIT IS ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH
WESTSHORE BOULEVARD WHICH IS A TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA
AND LEVEL A EVACUATION ZONE.
AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SKEET AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR.
TO THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD AND WEST
CYPRESS TREE OF.
NORTH OXIDANT STREET IS HERE.
PREDOMINANTLY NONRECOMMENDATION USES ALONG NORTH WESTSHORE
BOULEVARD.
.HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE SUBJECT SITE WITHIN THE RMU-100 LAND USE DESIGNATION
WHICH IS ONE OF THE MOST INTENSIVE LAND USE CATEGORIES IN
THE CITY WITH REGARD TO RESIDENTIAL INTENSITY AND DENSITY.
THE CATEGORY ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENTS UP TO -- SORRY 100
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE OR .35 F.A.R.
TO THE NORTH AND THE EAST OF SUBJECT SITE.
NOT NORTH IS THE M-AP-1, WHICH IS THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT LAND
USE CATEGORY.
WE HAVE AREAS SHOWN IN BLUE THAT REPRESENT PUBLIC,
SEMI-PUBLIC LANDS IN THE CITY.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUNT
CAN CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATED ON NORTHWESTSHORE BOULEVARD OF TRANSIT
EMPHASIS BOARD FEAR FOR BEAUTIFICATION AND INTENSIFICATION.
TRANSIT WITH SEVERAL TRANSIT STOPS WITHIN PROXIMITY OF THE
SITE THAT PROVIDES SERVICE TO EAST TAMPA, DOWNTOWN TAMPA,
WEST SHORE, AND THE TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.
THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT FORM STRATEGY AND
WALKING AND HOUSING NEAR RESIDENTIAL SERVICES AND AMENITIES.
THE PD PROPOSE AS 2.38 F.A.R. WELL BELOW THE F.A.R. THAT CAN
BE CONSIDERED ON THE SITE UNDER THE RMU-100.
AGAIN ALLOWS FOR THE PD IS PROPOSING A 2.38.
THE PD ADDRESSES THE MIXED USE OF ORIENTED BUILDING TOWARD
THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
THROUGHOUT THE SKEET.
THE PROPOSED INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WILL MAKE SURE
THAT PEDESTRIANS CAN SAFELY ACCESS THE AMENITIES AND RETAIL
LOCATED ON THE SITE.
PROPOSED REZONING REPRESENTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOUSING CITY'S POPULATION.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO HELP MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S PRESENT
AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
THE REQUEST WILL ADD ADDITIONAL HOUSING WITHIN THE WEST
SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT.
PORTIONS OF THE SITE OF THE COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND SHOULD
MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON SHELTER SPACE DEMANDS BASED ON THE
SHELTER SPACE LEVEL OF SERVICE.
THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO COORDINATE ANY HURRICANE
MITIGATION AND THE CITY OF TAMPA AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY
STANDARDS WITHIN THE WEST SHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND WEST
SHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ENCOURAGES THE APPLICANT TO
MEET WITH THE STANDARDS.
BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST KENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:01:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
07:01:47PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, AGAIN, COUNCIL, LaCHONE DOCK,
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS REQUEST -- THIS REZONING REQUEST TO A PD, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, WILL ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7502 SQUARE
FEET OF RETAIL SALES SPACE AND 398 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
UNITS ON-SITE ALONG WITH USE OF THE RESTAURANT ON-SITE.
THIS SITE IS FAIRLY LARGE.
OVER FOUR ACRES AS MENTIONED.
EARLIER BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DANNY MENTIONED.
SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET OF FRONTAGE AND 622
FEET IN DEPTH.
SO THIS IS THE SITE PLAN FOR THE SITE.
THIS SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT
AND DEVELOPMENT MUST APPLY TO THE WEST SHORE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS UNLESS THEY ARE WAIVED WITHIN A PART OF THIS PD,
AND YOU WILL SEE THERE ARE WAIVERS THAT ARE LISTED ON THE PD
THAT I WILL REVIEW FOR YOU SHORTLY.
THIS SUBJECT SITE LOCATED ON WEST SHORE BOULEVARD IS
CLASSIFIED AS A PRIORITY PEDESTRIAN STREET.
THE REZONING PLAN BEFORE YOU MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR THE
PRIORITY PEDESTRIAN STREET CLASSIFICATION WITHIN THE CODE.
THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS LOCATED HERE.
TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS SITE PLAN, THIS IS WEST SHORE
BOULEVARD.
THIS IS OXIDANT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE.
WHAT IS PROPOSED IS A NEW PRIVATE DRIVE WHICH WILL BE
LOCATED HERE WITH ACCESS ON WEST SHORE.
THIS DRIVE WILL MAKE THE CONNECTION TO THE WEST TO OXIDANT.
YOU CAN SEE THE DELINEATION OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS.
THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED LINE SHOWS THE EXISTING OP-1 VERY US
THE M-AP-1 ZONING.
GIVEN THE PROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE AIRPORT.
THIS WAS REVIEWED BY TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND THEY
FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT.
THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS WITHIN THE SITE THAT IS
EXISTING OP-1.
THE RESIDENTIAL -- THE SEVEN-STORY TOWER WILL BE LOCATED ON
SITE.
THE OPEN SPACE, THE DOG PARK, THESE GREEN SPACE AREAS ARE
LOCATED ON THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
YOUR COMMERCIAL IS LOCATED TO THE AUTOEST WITH THE OUTDOOR
SEATING AREAS OPPOSED ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK THAT WILL BE
PROVIDED WHICH MEETS THE WEST SHORE STANDARDS.
SO VEHICULAR ACCESS HAS A DROP OFF HERE.
A CIRCULAR DRIVE AND ENTER A GARAGE HERE AND SOME PARKING
THAT IS LOCATED THERE ON-SITE.
SO THIS IS THE ZONING ATLAS.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN RED.
THIS IS WEST SHORE BOULEVARD.
THIS IS CYPRESS STREET AND THIS IS OX IDANT WHICH IS THE
WEST PORTION OF THE SITE.
YOU CAN SEE THE OP-1 ZONING AND M-AP-1.
CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND PD WITH THE COMMERCIAL USES
FURTHER SOUTH ON THE SITE.
I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES WILL GO TO THE EAST OF THE SITE,
THE WEST AND THEN GO SOUTH, WORK OUR WAY EAST AND THEN
NORTH.
HERE IS AN ELEVATION.
HERE IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
THE TOP PICTURE IS THE EAST ELEVATION AND THEN THE BOTTOM IS
THE WEST ELEVATION.
AND THEN THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION.
AND I HAVE PICTURE OF THE SITE.
SOME THIS IS THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE.
HERE IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
A CLEARER PICTURE OF IT.
ON WEST SHORE.
THIS IS THE WESTERN END OF THE SITE.
SO THIS IS THE VIEW ON THE -- ON OXIDANT THIS IS ALSO ALONG
THE WEST THAT GIVES YOU A VIEW LOOKING NORTH ON OXIDANT.
THE SITE IN THE PICTURE IS TO THE RIGHT.
THIS IS ALSO WEST OF THE SITE.
COMMERCIAL USE.
THAT CONTINUES WEST.
AND WE WILL HEAD SOUTH OF THE SITE.
SO THIS IS THE HOTEL USE THAT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SITE.
THIS HAS THE ACCESS ON OXIDANT.
IT DOES NOT CONNECT THROUGH TO WEST SHORE.
AND THIS IS HEADED FURTHER SOUTH.
THIS IS SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE.
THE CORNER OF CYPRESS.
AND THEN WE SWING BACK AROUND.
THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE.
THE COMMERCIAL THAT EXISTS ALONG WEST SHORE.
THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW JUST SHOWING THE VIEW LOOKING NORTH ON
WEST SHORE.
THIS IS ALSO NORTH OF THE SITE.
AND THEN THIS IS DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE.
THE DRC STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST
INCONSISTENT PAUSE OF WAIVERS REQUESTED.
THE WAIVERS ARE RELATED TO THE NATIONAL RESOURCES CODE AND
TRANSPORTATION.
SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
ALSO THERE ARE ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN
DISCUSSED WITH STAFF PRIOR TO HEARING.
THAT WILL-INCORPORATED ON THE REVISION SHEET.
WHAT I AM GOING TO DO TO PRIOR TO A MOTION BEING MADE IS
PROVIDE YOU WITH AN UPDATED REVISION SHEET.
THOSE ARE CHANGES TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COUNCIL.
07:07:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS.
07:07:32PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU.
07:07:34PM >> GOOD EVENING, CAMI CORBETT WITH HILL, WARD AND HENDERSON
REPRESENTING TRAMMELL CROW.
WE ARE EXCITED TO BRING ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO THE
WEST SHORE AREA NORTH OF KENNEDY.
YOU HEARD 1501 NORTH WESTSHORE WHICH IS A SIMILAR
SINGLE-FAMILY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
WE ARE PROPOSING A SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT HERE THIS EVENING.
WITH ANY REDEVELOP PROJECT, WE DO REQUIRE WAIVERS AND I
WOULD LIKE TO HAVE RANDY COHEN FROM COHEN AND COMPANY AND
RICKY PETERIKA FROM DARK MOSS FOR OUR LANDSCAPING BUFFERING.
07:08:18PM >> GOOD EVENING, RANDY COHEN, 4121 WEST CYPRESS STREET.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
I AM ADDRESSING TRANSPORTATION WAIVERS.
ONES YOU HAVE SEEN BEFORE.
FIRST ONE IS A SMALL PARKING RATIO.
WE DISCUSSED PARKING RATIOS AND THE PLAN TWO MONTHS AGO WHEN
1515 WEST SHORE MULTIFAMILY WAS PROPOSED.
WE CONTINUE TO SEE TRENDS OF PARKING RATIOS GOING
DOWN HOVERING AROUND 174 AS AN AN AVERAGE.
OUR CODE REQUIRES A 1.9, 1.8 DEPENDING ON THE PRODUCT.
I HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF WORKING ON A PARKING STUDY, FOR 501
GRAND CENTRAL AVENUE, REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA, WHERE
WE DETERMINED WHAT THEIR ACTUAL PARKING RATIO WAS ONCE THEY
WERE CONSTRUCTED AND OCCUPIED.
1.39 WHICH NETTED 100 SPACE PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC PARKING
WITHIN THE HYDE PARK AREA, NORTH HYDE PARK AREA.
1515 WEST SHORE.
WE PRESENTED THAT.
THEY ASKED FOR A 13.4% WAIVER.
AND THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL AFTER CONSIDERATION.
THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT ASKS FOR A 12% WAIVER THAT -- OH,
SORRY, THERE WE ARE.
THIS IS ALTIS WHERE THEIR ACTUAL PARKING RATIO 1.39.
1515 WEST SHORE APPROVED IN DECEMBER.
THEY ENDED UP WITH THEIR WAIVER WITH 1.44.
1200 WEST SHORE BEFORE YOU TODAY WILL HAVE A PARKING RATIO.
VERY AMPLE PARKING.
SO THEY ARE ASKING FOR A VERY SMALL WAIVER.
THE SECOND WAIVER WE HAVE A TRANSPORTATION PERSPECTIVE --
AND I WILL MAKE SURE THIS ONE IS MORE APPROPRIATED ORIENTED.
THIS IS OXIDANT, A SERVICE ROAD.
THIS IS PRIMARILY INDUSTRIAL.
THIS IS THE REAR OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH IS THE OLD
RAMADA INN.
THE VEHICLE MANEUVERING WAIVER FOR A COUPLE OF DUMPSTERS
RIGHT HERE.
THIS STREET CURRENTLY HAS A VEHICLE MANEUVERING ISSUE FOR
THE PERPENDICULAR PARKING SPACES HERE.
THEY ALSO HAVE THE NEED FOR VEHICLE MANEUVERING IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A SOLID WASTE FACILITY HERE, AS WELL
AS PARKING HERE.
WHEN YOU LOOK IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, YOU SEE LOTS OF THINGS
THAT HAVE MANEUVERING WAIVERS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THEM.
NOT UNUSUAL.
VERY LOW VOLUME STREET.
NONRESIDENTIAL IN NATURE.
FINALLY, WE HAVE WHAT IS A BLOOMING WAIVER FOR RESIDENTIAL
PRODUCTS SIMPLY BECAUSE OUR CODE REQUIRES LOADING BERTHS FOR
ALL LARGE BUILDINGS AS IT SHOULD.
IN WEST SHORE, WE ONLY REQUIRE ONE LOADING BERTH FOR THE
BUILDING VERSUS.
12 X 60 LOADING BERTH FOR A LARGE COMMERCIAL LIED VAN
MOVING.
WE DON'T SEE MANY OF THOSE TRUCKS ESPECIALLY MULTIFAMILY.
TAMPA HAS A CODE CRITERIA FOR A SMALL LOADING BERTH WHICH IS
30 FEET THAT WE HAVE THREE OF THOSE.
HOWEVER WE DO NOT HAVE A 60-FOOT AND ASKING A WAIVER FROM 60
FEET TO 30 FEET.
I DID A QUICK INVENTORY OF THE NUMBER OF ENTITIES SEEN
AS HOME, ETC.
WHAT IS THE TYPE OF TRUCKS THAT GO TO MULTIFAMILY AND
RETAIL.
WE DON'T REQUIRE A LOADING BERTH OF RETAIL PAUSE OF ITS
SIZE.
I WENT TO SEE WHAT IS THE TYPICAL VEHICLE SIZE USED.
ALL LESS THAN 30 FEET.
WE ARE ASKING FOR THE WAIVER TO THE 30-FOOT LOADING BIRTH.
WE ARE PROVIDING A 35-FOOT LOADING BERTH TO PROVIDE A LITTLE
EXTRA ROOM.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
07:12:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
07:12:32PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
RICKY PETERIKA, EAST 7th AVENUE.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN TWO NATURAL RESOURCE WAIVERS.
FIRST IS FOR RETENTION.
THE WEST SHORE DISTRICT REQUIRES 25% OF PROTECTED TREES TO
BE RETAINED.
WE CURRENTLY PROVIDE 10%.
AS NOTED UP THERE.
THE PLAN REQUEST IS FOR 5% JUST BECAUSE -- THERE ARE SO FEW
TREES THAT SOMETHING CAN HAPPEN IN DEVELOPMENT.
WE DON'T WANT ONE TREE TO TRIGGER SOMETHING IN PERMITTING
AND REQUESTED A SAFETY FACTOR.
SINCE THIS INVENTORY WAS CREATED, WE WERE ABLE TO PRESERVE
ADDITIONAL TREES IN THE WEST PORTION OF THE SITE
NEAR TOOXIDANT SHOWN HERE.
THESE THREE ADDITIONAL TREES INCREASE OUR ACTUAL RETENTION
TO 20%.
SO A WAIVER IS STILL NEEDED.
BUT WE ARE GOING TO REQUEST 15%.
IF WE USED THE NEWLY UPDATED WEIGHTED PERCENTAGE THAT CAME
IN THE 2022 -- OR THE JANUARY 2020 CYCLE CODE AMENDMENT
ADOPTED IN OCTOBER 2022, WE COME UP WITH 39% OF RETENTION
WHICH WOULD EXCEED THE WEST SHORE RETENTION WAIVER.
STAFF ACKNOWLEDGED THIS.
WE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS, BUT BECAUSE THIS WAS SUBMITTED
-- THIS PD WAS SUBMITTED UNDER THE PRE-OCTOBER 2020, WE ARE
PROCEEDING WITH THE WAIVER REQUEST, BUT ADJUSTING IT TO 15%
WITH THIS PRESERVATION.
THE OTHER WAIVER IS FOR BUFFERS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
CURRENTLY THE CODE REQUIRES 15 FEET.
15-FOOT BUFFER ON THE NORTH BECAUSE OF MULTIFAMILY ADJACENT
TO THE C US.
AND TO THE SOUTH MULTIFAMILY TO A C USE.
SIX-FOOT MASONRY WALL AND TURF ONLY.
TO THE NORTH, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PROVIDED NATIVE TREES
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF A SIDEWALK.
AND THEN A MIX OF NATIVE SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER ADJACENT IS
A FOUNDATION PLAN TO THE BUILDING.
THE STAFF IS CONSIDERING THE BUFFER FIVE FEET PAUSE OF THE
SIDEWALK BUT EFFECTIVELY PROVIDING WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO
THINK AS A MODIFIED C BUFFER THAT INCLUDES TREES THAT WILL
NOT NORMALLY BE REQUIRED.
INCLUDE PLANTS THAT NORMALLY WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.
WITH THE SIDEWALK BECOMES A PEDESTRIAN AMENITY VERSUS JUST A
YARD AND A WALL.
ON THE SOUTH, A TYPICAL TACTIC IS USED, BUT WHAT IS
HAPPENING THERE IS THE EXISTING CURB LINE THAT WAS
MAINTAINED AND CURB CUTS ON EITHER SIDE THAT WAS MAINTAINED
FROM THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT IS KEPT HERE AND THAT IS
DEFINING THE WIDTH OF THE BUFFER.
ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS WALL AND GRASS.
AND WE ARE PROVIDING HOLDING THAT CURB LINE AND PROVIDING
OAK TREES, SHADE TREES AND NATIVE GROUND COVER AND SHRUBS AS
A SUPPLEMENT OR REPLACEMENT TO MITIGATE.
I APOLOGIZE.
SORRY, COUNCIL.
THOUGH THESE ARE HALF THE SKEET, THESE BUFFER CONDITIONS ARE
CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE AREA THAT THE BUFFER IS
REQUESTED IN.
AND I WILL TURN THE PRESENTATION BACK TO MISS CORBETT.
07:16:15PM >> CAMI CORBETT AGAIN FOR THE RECORD.
THAT THOROUGHLY EXPLAINS WHERE WE HAVE THE WAIVERS.
I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT ONLY ONE OF THE WAIVERS IS A WAIVER
TO THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY.
THE REST WILL COMPLY ABOUT THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY.
I RECEIVED ONE PHONE CALL FROM THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS MR.
SCAGLIONE WHO OWN AS PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH AND HE HAD NO
OBJECTIONS TO THE PROJECT.
AND WITH THAT, WE ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
07:16:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER.
THANK YOU.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
6, FILE NO. REZ-22-87.
SEEING NONE.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
07:17:01PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:17:06PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
07:17:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:17:09PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR.
I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING AND
CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1200
NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
TECHNICALLY DESCRIBED SECTION 1 FROM OP-1 OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL AND M-AP-1, MUNITIONAL AIRPORT TO PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, RETAIL AND
RESTAURANTS PROVIDED AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:17:46PM >> SECOND.
07:17:47PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE GOALS AND POLICIES IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
FOR EXAMPLE, THE PROPOSED USES AND INTENSITY ARE CONSISTENT
WITH THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE
POLICY 8.14.1 AND ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON UNDERUTILIZED
LAND TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE HOUSING SUPPLY TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF TAMPA'S FUTURE AND PRESENT POPULATION ON 9.2.1.
1.3.1, 1.3.3, AND 1.3.4.
I FIND COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN SECTION
27-136 BECAUSE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS SHOWN THE SITE
PROMOTES OR ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT APPROPRIATE IN
LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING
AN AREA.
ALSO THE PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE SUFFICIENT AND
SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
WAIVERS I FIND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 27-134 1394, THAT
THE DESIGN IS EWE PHOENIX AND THE REQUEST OF THE WAIVERS
WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLIER.
07:18:49PM >> FEAR OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTIES THAT
WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE WAIVERS.
THAT CONCLUDES MY MOTION.
07:18:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
RESTRICTION BETWEEN FIRST AN SECOND?
07:19:02PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MISS DOCK FILED WITH THE CLERK A REVISION
SHEET FEBRUARY 8, 2023.
IF CAN BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
07:19:10PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN NOW AND
SECOND READING AS WELL.
07:19:14PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
REVISED REVISION SHEET.
07:19:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE REVISED REVISION SHEET.
07:19:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHO IS THE SECONDER?
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ROLL CALL ROTE.
07:19:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:19:30PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:19:33PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:19:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:19:36PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:19:38PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:19:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:19:40PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
07:19:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6 -- 7.
FILE NO. REZ-22-109.
07:20:02PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSE READY HE ZONING AT 2713 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE
FROM PD TO RS-50.
I WILL PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:20:19PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THE ESSENTIAL TAMPA PLANNING
DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
CLOSEST PUBLIC TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 264
FEET WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST
COLUMBUS DRIVE AND WEST HABANA AVENUE OF HART ROUTE 15 THAT
PROVIDES ACCESS TO WEST SHORE AND THE NETWORK PARK TRANSFER
CENTER.
SUBJECT SITE WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE E.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
YOU WILL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COLUMBUS
DRIVE BETWEEN HABANA AVENUE AND NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
SUBJECT SITE IS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH
THERE ARE SOME MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG COLUMBUS
DRIVE.
AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES AS YOU MOVE TOWARD HABANA AVENUE.
SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
FUTURE LAND USE ALLOWING FOR UP TO 2.4 F.A.R.
35 IS FOUND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COLUMBUS DRIVE AND TO THE
SOUTH IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION.
TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL-10.
AN ALLEY THAT SEPARATES THE PROPERTIES JUST NORTH OF THE
SUBJECT SITE FROM THE RESIDENTIAL-10.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS PORTION OF WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE BETWEEN NORTH HABANA
AND TAMPANIA AVENUE.
9.63 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND EXISTING DENSITY IS 26% OF
THE DENSITY TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE
35 DES EGG NATION.
UNDER THE CMU-35 DESIGNATION THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR
A MAXIMUM OF THREE DWELLING UNITS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE LOT WIDTH ALONG
SEGMENT OF WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
49 FEET TO 108 FEET WITH THE MAJORITY BEING APPROXIMATELY 50
FEET.
THE LOT WIDTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE
SUBMITTED SURVEY.
TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE EXISTING PLOT DENSITY OF WEST
COMPUTER DRIVE.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST WILL PROVIDE A
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BE BUILT WITHIN THE
EXISTING STREET BLOCK AND CONFIGURATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS MANY OF THE
POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO HOUSING
THE CITY'S POPULATION.
THE COMPREHENSIVE ENCOURAGES HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S FUTURE AND
PRESENT POPULATIONS.
THE REQUEST WILL MAINTAIN THE STABILITIABILITY AND EXPANDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING CHOICES IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN
VILLAGE.
BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS
IT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
07:23:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
07:23:47PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH, YOU WILL HAVE WEST IVY STREET.
TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
TO THE WEST NORTH HABANA AVENUE.
AND THIS LOT IS ALONG WEST COLUMBUS.
TO THE SOUTH YOU WILL HAVE WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET.
TO THE NORTH, SOUTHEAST AND WEST OF THE PROPERTY ARE ALL
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
CURRENTLY THE SITE IS VACANT AT THIS TIME.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS AN AREA 4700 SQUARE FEET.
NOW ALTHOUGH THIS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS
OF THE RS-50 ZONING 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
THIS LOT CAN BE REZONED RS-50 DUE TO BEING IN THE WEST TAMPA
OVERLAY WHERE A LOT EXISTING BY PLAT OR DEED SINCE 2004 IS
CONSIDERED A LOT OF RECORD.
THE LOT HAS A WIDTH OF 49.96 FEET AND A LOT LENGTH OF 93.87
FEET.
AS YOU SEE, IT IS ALONG THAT -- THAT WAY OF WEST COLUMBUS
DRIVE AND IN BETWEEN NORTH HABANA AVENUE AND NORTH TAMPANIA
AVENUE.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES, I WILL SHOW YOU
WHAT IS EXISTING.
THIS IS THE VACANT LOT AS IS.
YOU SEE THE PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN TO WEST YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY AND A MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ALONG THE WEST OF WEST COLUMBUS.
TO THE EAST, YOU ARE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF WEST
COLUMBUS.
TO THE SOUTHEAST, YOU WILL SEE MORE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.
AND DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
DEVELOPMENT START VIDEO REVIEWED AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
IF THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD APPROVE THIS CASE, THIS BEING
EUCLIDIAN, NO SITE PLAN IS NEAT NEEDED AND NO REVIEW SHEET
PILL BE THERE ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
07:27:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
SEEING NONE.
PETITIONER.
07:27:15PM >> HI, I AM CARIDAD ALJURE.
AND THE ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY IS 2713 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE.
MY REASON HERE TODAY IS TO GET YOUR PERMISSION TO REZONE
FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL SO I CAN MR. MY HOME.
AND THAT'S WHY I'M HERE TODAY.
07:27:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER.
DO YOU KNOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF YOUR PROPERTY?
WHAT IS THE FRONT FOOTAGE AND THE DEPTH?
07:27:58PM >> I DON'T KNOW.
07:27:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSAIN.
07:28:01PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF I REMEMBER 40 AND A HALF BY 90.
07:28:07PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE LOT AREA IS 4700 SQUARE FEET.
THE WIDTH IS 49.96 FEET.
AND THE LENGTH IS 93.87 FEET.
07:28:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THIS IS CONFORMING TO A 50?
07:28:23PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THIS CAN BE REZONED RS-50 BEING IN THE WEST
TAMPA OVERLAY, YES.
07:28:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER OR STAFF?
ANYONE IN CHAMBER WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
SEVEN -- FILE NUMBER FILE NO. REZ-22-109.
07:28:41PM >> HELLO, MY NAME IS DANIELLE STUCKEY.
9115 NORTH FRANKLIN STREET.
07:28:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN.
07:28:53PM >> I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
I AM FINALLY ENROLLED IN MY FINAL YEAR OF ST. PETE COLLEGE.
MY HONEST REASON FOR SPEAKING TODAY TO SATISFY A REQUIREMENT
FOR THAT DEGREE, BUT ALSO BECAUSE I TRULY BELIEVE THAT THE
AFOREMENTIONED PROPOSAL SHOULD BE APPROVED.
IN MY RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER FILE NO. REZ-22-109 FILED
BY THE APPLICANT WAS NOT ONLY SUBMITTED IN TIMELY FASHION
BUT FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA'S CODE OF
ORDINANCES.
ACCORDING TO REZONING STAFF REPORT FILED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW AND COMPLIANT STAFF.
AND QUICK SUMMARY, THE APPLICANT REQUEST TO REZONE THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2713 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE FROM ITS
CURRENT STATUS AS A PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE AND INSTEAD
REPURPOSE AND REZONE THIS LAND SO IT FALLS WITHIN
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 SO IS MAY BE USED FOR
RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES.
CURRENT TIME, THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS VACANT.
THE PROPERTY FURTHERMORE IS SURROUNDED BY A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCES OR OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.
THIS IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE AS I AM SURE YOU ALL AWARE A MAJOR
REQUIREMENT OF APPROVAL OF SUCH APPLICATIONS THAT THE
PROPERTY SHOULD BE MINIMALLY DISRUPTIVE TO ADJACENT AREAS
NOR DESTROY THE PEACE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IT IS PLACED OR
ZONED WITHIN.
CONSIDERING THE APPLICANT WISHES TO USE THE PROPERTY FOR THE
SAME PURPOSE AS THE MAJORITY OF THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS
AND STRUCTURES.
THIS SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.
FURTHERMORE IN THE REZONING STAFF REPORT, QUOTE, THE SITE IS
LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF MEDIUM
INTENSITY/DENSITY HORIZONTAL AND MIXED USE, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES UNQUOTE.
PROPOSED RS-50 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
PER THE CONSISTENCY MATRIX LOCATED WITHIN THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE INFORMATION AND ALL THE
PROJECTS IF APPROVED WOULD RESULT IN VERY MINIMAL NEGATIVE
IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING AREA.
SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE MY WORD FOR IT.
THE DIRECT QUOTE LOCATED WITHIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT STATED THE FOLLOWING: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS
THAT THE POTENTIAL FOR ONE UNIT THROUGH APPROVAL OF THIS
REQUEST WILL ALLOW FOR COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AN
AREA PLANNED FOR 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
IN CLOSING I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE THE BASIC FACTS.
APPLICATION FILE NO. REZ-22-109 SATISFIES ALL THE REQUESTS
BY THE CITY OF TAMPA.
SECOND, THE APPLICANT PROVIDED IN A TIMELY MANNER AND ENOUGH
MATERIAL TO SUBSTANTIATE.
AND IT YOU NOT SEEM TO HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE CITY OF
TAMPA AND HAS BEEN LABELED CONSISTENT BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW AND
COMPLIANT STAFF.
FOR THOSE REASONS, I DO BELIEVE IT WILL BE BENEFICIAL FOR THE
APPLICATION TO BE APPROVED.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
[ APPLAUSE ]
07:31:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
ARE WE HIRING?
ARE YOU -- PLEASE.
[LAUGHTER]
07:31:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS DOCK AND STAFF, I AM SURE SHE CAN GET A
FEW REFERENCES UP HERE.
VERY WELL-DONE.
07:32:03PM >> THANK YOU.
07:32:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SEND US A NOTE HOW WELL YOU DID WITH THE
CLASS.
07:32:07PM >> THANK YOU.
I WILL LET YOU KNOW.
MY LAST CLASS BEFORE I GRADUATE.
07:32:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
STAFF, THANK YOU.
BOY, ANY OTHER PEOPLE IN CHAMBER -- TOUGH ACT TO FOLLOW --
THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN?
I DO NOT SEE ANYBODY ONLINE.
07:32:27PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MO TO CLOSE.
07:32:28PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
07:32:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:32:35PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
FILE NUMBER FILE NO. REZ-22-109, ORDINANCE
BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READINGK, ORDINANCE REZONING
PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2713 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE
IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARILY DESCRIBED
IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, TO RS-50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:33:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:33:06PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:33:10PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:33:12PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:33:13PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:33:17PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:33:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:33:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:33:20PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
07:33:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ATE, FILE NO. REZ-22-123.
07:33:36PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN.
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
REZONING AT 1200 WEST CASS STREET FROM IG AND CI TO CI.
I WILL PASS IT ON TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:33:50PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
GOOD EVENING, DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE
SPECIFICALLY IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
JOEY LANE RIVERFRONT PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL
FACILITY.2 MILES NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS .17 OF WEST CASS STREET AND N.
BOULEVARD.
HART ROUTE 7 AND 10 PROVIDING CONNECTIONS TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA,
WEST TAMPA AND THE TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.
SUBJECT SITE WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE B.
AN AREA MAP OF THE SURROUNDING SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST CASS, JUST EAST OF
THE INTERVENTION OF NEWPORT AVENUE.
SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY
MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THAT DESIGNATION TO THE NORTH, EAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF
SUBJECT SITE AND ALLOWS DEVELOPMENT OF 2.0 F.A.R. AND 35
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND ALLOWS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
COMMERCIAL GENERAL, MULTIFAMILY, SINGLE-FAMILY, ATTACHED
USES.
AS YOU MOVE NORTH OF CASS, LAND RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL-35 DESIGNATION.
THE GENERAL MIXED USE-24 DESIGNATION.
THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL REZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED
UNDER -- THE PROPOSED CI ZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED
WITHIN THE GMU 24 DESIGNATION WITH THE MAY TRICKS OF 27-21
OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS CHARACTERIZED BY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
USES.
FURTHER TO THE NORTH THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
SURROUNDED BY PARCELS ZONED CI AND IG.
CI ZONING IS PRESENT TO THE NORTH, WEST AND EAST OF THE
SITED.
AND GENERAL ZONING IS TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
DUE TO THE DIVERSE RANGE OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES
IN PROXIMITY.
THE CI ZONING DISTRICT WILL BE APPROPRIATE.
ANY DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE TO MEET THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS THAT
ENHANCE THE CITY OF TAMPA CHARACTER AND AMBIENCE.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT
TO SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND ENSURE THAT SOCIAL AND
ECONOMIC HEALTH OF THE CITY.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND
FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST WILL NOT
ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AN AREA AND
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE TO THE WEST TAMPA VILLAGE.
BASED ON THE CONSIDERATION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE QUESTION CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, POLICIES OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY
QUESTIONS.
07:37:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
07:37:14PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL FIRST SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED.
NOW THIS PROPOSED REZONING -- AS YOU SEE, THERE ARE TWO
ZONES AS YOU SEE TO THE NORTH SIDE.
YOU WILL HAVE CI.
TO THE SOUTH SIDE HERE, YOU WILL HAVE AN IG.
SO IT IS SPLIT BETWEEN TWO ZONES HERE ON WEST CASS STREET.
YOU WILL HAVE N. BOULEVARD HERE TO THE EAST.
YOU WILL HAVE U.T. TAMPA PREP AND COORDINATION OFFICE.
IF YOU LOOK TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE NORTH NEWPORT AVENUE.
TO THE NORTH, YOU WILL HAVE WEST CYPRESS STREET.
AND TO THE SOUTH, YOU GO DOWN, YOU WILL HAVE MORE OF U.T.
AND WEST NORTH 8th STREET.
NOW THE PROPERTY HERE IS ENCOMPASSED AND SURROUNDED BY
EITHER OFFICE OR REPAIR SHOPS FOR AUTOMOBILES.
THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY.51 ACRES IN SIZE.
CURRENTLY AN OFFICE -- ASSOCIATED PARKING LOT ON THE SITE AT
THIS CURRENT TIME.
THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE PICTURES I TOOK OF THE SITE.
AS YOU SEE THE SITE AS IS WITH THE CURRENT OFFICE.
RIGHT NOW ON CASS STREET.
STANDING ON CASS STREET.
HERE IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN.
AND YOU HAVE THE INFORMATION BUILDING.
ACROSS THE STREET, THIS IS CASS STREET RIGHT HERE.
ACROSS THE STREET, YOU HAVE AN OFFICE.
TO THE EAST OF THE SITE ALONG CASS STREET, YOU WILL HAVE N.
BOULEVARD.
YOU WILL HAVE UT.
YOU WILL HAVE DOWNTOWN TAMPA.
AND ALSO TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU WILL HAVE MORE
OFFICES.
HERE YOU GO.
TO THE WEST OF SITE HERE, YOU HAVE MORE OFFICES.
YOU HAVE BUDDY BREW HERE AND ALSO A CAR REPAIR SHOP TO THE
WEST ON CASS.
TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE A GRAPHICS AND DESIGN
OFFICE.
AND TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE OFFICES AND ALSO
CONSTRUCTION TO THE SOUTH.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FOUND THE OVERALL
REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
NO REVIEW SHEET AND NO SITE PLAN AS THIS IS EUCLIDIAN.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:40:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
WHILE YOU ARE PLUGGING THAT IN, I SEE THAT WE ALSO HAVE SOME
OF YOUR OTHER PEOPLE THAT MAY BE ONLINE.
ARE THEY GOING TO SPEAK?
BECAUSE IF SO, I WOULD LIKE THEM TO BE SWORN IN NOW.
07:41:10PM >> NO ONE ON OUR TEAM WILL BE SPEAKING ONLINE, UNLESS
SOMEBODY ELSE REGISTERED.
07:41:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
OKAY.
I JUST SEE A REPRESENTATIVES AND OWNERS.
07:41:20PM >> NOPE, IT WILL JUST BE ME.
07:41:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, MA'AM, THANK YOU.
07:41:25PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
ALEC SCHALER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE FOR THE RECORD.
I AM VERY BRIEF.
I AM NOT FORTUNATE TO BRING MANY EUCLIDIANS IN FRONT OF YOU,
BUT THIS ONE IS STRAIGHTFORWARD.
ZAIN DID A GOOD JOB LOCATING IT.
IT DOES LOOK LIKE TWO PARCELS BUT A SINGLE PARCEL AND
BIFURCATED BY A NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY.
LEAVING THAT ALLEY AS IS.
NOT PROPOSED TO BE VACATED IN CONJUNCTION TO THIS
APPLICATION.
THE CURRENT ZONING -- A COLORED MAP OF WHAT ZAIN WAS
SHOWING.
SPLIT ZONED.
ZONED CI AND THE SOUTHERN PORTION IG.
TO DRAG THE CI DESIGNATION OVER THE ENTIRETY OF THE PARCEL
IF HE CAN DEFINITELY DROPPING THE IG DESIGNATION.
A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THIS REQUEST.
NOT ONLY IS THE PARCEL SPLIT SCREENED BUT THE BUILDING IS
SPLIT ZONED.
TAKES UP THE ENTIRE RIGHT BLOCK OF THE PARCEL.
THE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1930.
THE OWNER WITH A TONIGHT KEEP IT.
THEY HAVE A NEW TENANT AND HIS PROPOSED BUSINESSES ARE NOT
CONSISTENT WITH THE IG.
THEY ARE COMMERCIAL.
AND THE REASON BEHIND THE REQUEST.
DEALING WITH THE COP PLAN CONSISTENCY.
I WANTED TO NO ET THAT THE CI BEING DRUG ACROSS THE
ENTIRETY OF THE PARCEL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND
THE GMU DESIGNATION.
STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT AND SO DID THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
AND WITH THAT I WILL CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION AND AVAILABLE
FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:43:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR ANY QUESTIONS?
ANYBODY WITHIN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER 8, FILE NO. REZ-22-123.
07:43:25PM >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:43:28PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
07:43:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE ANY ONLINE, MADAM
CLERK.
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:43:40PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
ALL RIGHT, FILE NO. REZ-22-123.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1200
WEST CASS STREET CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXCEPTION 1, ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, IG
INDUSTRIAL GENERAL TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI,
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:44:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES AND SECOND BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR -- EXCUSE ME, ROLL CALL.
07:44:20PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:44:21PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:44:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:44:25PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:44:26PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:44:27PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:44:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:44:30PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MELD ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
07:44:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER NINE.
FILE NO. REZ-22-131.
07:44:47PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE ADDRESS 1105 EAST LOUISIANA AVENUE.
PROPOSED FROM SH-RS TO SH-PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED.
I WILL NOW PASS IT ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:45:07PM >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR NEXT CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
GIBBONS PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECOGNIZE REGENCY FACILITY .4
MILES NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS .3 OF EAST OSBOURNE AVENUE.
THE SITE IS SERVICED BY HART ROUTE 9 WHICH PROVIDES
CONNECTIONS TO THE UNIVERSITY AREA AND DOWNTOWN TAMPA.
SUBJECT SITE IS EVACUATION ZONE E.
SUBJECT SITE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST HA LA AVENUE.
IT IS EAST OF -- WEST OF INTERSECTION OF NORTH 12th AND EAST
OSBORNE AVENUE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND
USE DESIGNATION.
UP TO TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE R-150 IS TO THE NORTH, EAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
AND THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS LAND RECOGNIZED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-20 DESIGNATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THAT THE REQUEST IS
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS CHARACTERIZED BY SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED USES.
A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT
SITE.
THE AN AREA BETWEEN EAST OSBORNE AND EAST NEW ORLEANS AVENUE
AND NORTH 11th STREET AND NORTH 12th STREET HAVE AN EXISTING
OF 7.21 UNITS PER ACRE.
WELL BELOW -- BELOW THE MAXIMUM OF 10 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 7.69 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE DEVELOPING
PATTERN IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING IN VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZE LAND TO
ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO MEET TAMPA'S NEED OF
GROWING POPULATION.
DIRECT A SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE CENTER AND VILLAGES.
PROPOSED PD SUPPORTS THIS POLICY BY CREATING HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE.
PD PROPOSES A SIDEWALK ALONG EAST LOUISIANA AVENUE.
AND HELP ENSURE THAT SIDEWALKS INTERCONNECT WITH EXISTING
AND FUTURE SIDEWALKS ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
AND BASED ON THIS CONSIDERATION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT ENDS MY PRESENTATION AND WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
07:48:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
THANK YOU.
07:48:25PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AS YOU SEE
THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED HERE IN RED ALONG EAST LOUISIANA
AVENUE.
YOU HAVE EAST NEW ORLEANS AVENUE TO THE NORTH.
YOU HAVE NORTH 9th STREET TO THE WEST.
TO THE EAST HERE, YOU WILL HAVE NORTH 13th STREET.
AND TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL HAVE EAST OSBORNE AVENUE.
NOW THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY SH-RS ZONING.
THESE ARE ALL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
THE ONLY ONE THAT DOESN'T HAVE A HOME IS HERE TO -- IS
DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH AND THE LOT IS VACANT AT THIS TIME.
I WILL NOW SHARE THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS FOR TWO RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINED A LOT AREA OF APPROXIMATELY
11,497 SQUARE FEET OR .26 ACRES.
THE SITE CURRENTLY HAS ONE 377-SQUARE-FOOT STRUCTURE THAT
WILL BE DEMOLISHED.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CREATE TWO LOTS HERE.
ON THE LOT TO THE WEST WILL MEASURE 45 FEET IN WIDTH AND THE
LOT TO THE EAST WILL ALSO BE 45 FEET.
AS YOU SEE THE TWO PROPOSED LOTS.
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WILL BE 35 FEET IN HEIGHT OR TWO
STORIES.
THE VEHICLE ACCESS IS PROVIDED ON EAST LOUISIANA AVENUE, AS
YOU SEE.
ONE AND TWO.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE TWO PARKING SPACES AND THE
SITE PLAN SHOW THAT THE APPLICANT MEETS THE REQUIREMENT BY
HAVING TWO PARKING SPACES PROPOSED LOCATED IN AN ATTACHED
CARPORT FOR EACH UNIT.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
FOR LOT 3, THE NORTH ELEVATION.
07:50:43PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
PUT IT HIGHER.
07:50:45PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
I WILL ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT.
07:50:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
NO, RAISE IT UP.
SO THE ELEVATION, WE CAN SEE THAT.
KEEP GOING.
OKAY.
SORRY, IT IS VERY FAINT.
07:50:58PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THE NORTH ELEVATION AND ALSO THE SOUTH
ELEVATION.
FOR THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATION OF LOT 3.
EAST ELEVATION.
AND WEST ELEVATION.
FOR LOT 4, THE EAST ELEVATION HERE.
AND THE WEST ELEVATION.
AND ALSO FOR LOT 4, THE NORTH ELEVATION.
AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES MYSELF, I WILL
SHOW YOU WHAT I SAW.
THE SITE AS IS.
THERE WAS A FENCE THERE, BUT YOU HAVE THE SIGN FOR PUBLIC
NOTICE.
IF YOU LOOK -- ALSO I WILL SHOW YOU ANOTHER PICTURE.
A 377-SQUARE-FOOT STRUCTURE ON THE LOT WHICH WILL BE
DEMOLISHED.
AS I PEEKED OVER THE FENCE AND TOOK A PICTURE, YOU WILL SEE
THE ONE STRUCTURE ON THE LOT AND THE REST OF THE LOT IS
UNDEVELOPED AT THIS TIME.
TO THE WEST, YOU WILL SEE A LOT OF AGRICULTURE.
A LOT OF TREES.
TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
BEHIND THE GATE.
TO THE NORTH OPPOSITE STREET ON EAST LOUISIANA.
TO THE NORTH, YOU WILL HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
TO THE EAST, YOU WILL HAVE MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
AND TO THE WEST YOU WILL HAVE MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
UP AND DOWN EAST LOUISIANA AVENUE.
I WAS JOKING WITH THE NATURAL RESOURCES -- WITH ERIN.
I SAID I AM NOT AN ARBORIST OR ANYTHING, BUT THOSE ARE
PRETTY COOL TREES YOU GOT THERE.
THEY ARE VERY, VERY NICE.
THERE ARE TWO PROPOSED WAIVERS.
THESE ARE FROM URBAN DESIGN.
FIRST ONE IS TO REQUEST TO INCREASE THE FRONT BUILD FROM
33.8 FEET TO 37 FEET.
THE SECOND REQUEST IS TO INCREASE THE CARPORT ROOF FROM 4
OUT OF 12 TO 6 OUT OF 12 ROOF PITCH.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLAINS STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS IT OVERALL CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE APPLICATION, WILL PROVIDE
REVISIONS TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
ANY QUESTIONS?
07:54:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
07:54:35PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS, I AM DAVID WRIGHT,
PRESIDENT OF PSP COMPANIES.
TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33688.
I THINK STAFF HAS COVERED THE REQUEST PRETTY ACCURATELY.
I WOULD JUST ADD THAT THE FIRST WAIVER TO INCREASE THE
BUILD-TO LINE IS TO SATISFY THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.
WE HAD TO MOVE THE HOUSE BACK A LITTLE BIT FROM THE STREET
IN ORDER TO MAKE IT -- MAKE IT -- AVAILABLE FOR THE SECOND
CAR TO PARK IN THE DRIVEWAY.
THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ROOF PITCH ON THE CARPORT IS SO IT
WILL MATCH THE ROOF PITCH OF THE TOP OF THE HOUSE TOO.
WE FELT LIKE ARCHITECTURALLY IT LOOKED BETTER FOR THOSE TO
BE CONSISTENT.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
07:55:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WITHIN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK
TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9?
07:55:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:55:31PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
SETH SAITH MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:55:39PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, FILE
NUMBER 9, FILE NO. REZ-22-131.
ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1105
EAST LOUISIANA AVENUE, IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
CLASSIFICATION SH-RD, SEMINOLE TO PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
07:56:10PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
07:56:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:56:16PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
BEFORE I GO ANY FURTHER, COMPLIES WITH
THE STAFF NOTE OF THE 377-SQUARE-FOOT STRUCTURE TO BE
DEMOLISHED I FIND IT WINTER IT 9.27 OF.1, 1.3.1, AND ENSURE
ACCURATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING NEEDS TO BE MET FOR THE PRESENCE
OF TAMPA AND THE FUTURE POPULATION.
AND REGARDING THE WAIVERS.
THE WAIVERS MEET THE PURPOSE AND THE INTENT FOR THE PD
ZONING DISTRICT TO RECOGNIZE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT ALLOW
THE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY.
THE REQUESTED WAIVER DOES NOT SUBSTANTIAL ALLEY INTERFERE
WITH THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WILL BE AFFECTED BY
THE WAIVER.
07:56:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT IS WITH REVISION BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND.
07:57:01PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
U.S.
07:57:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:57:09PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:57:10PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:57:11PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:57:12PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:57:13PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:57:14PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:57:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:57:17PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2nd,
2023, AT 9:30 A.M.

07:57:35 >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN, AGENDA ITEM 10, CASE REZ-23-02,
THIS PROPOSED REZONING FOR THE LOCATION 2132 WEST SAINT
CONRAD STREET.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS 50 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED.
I'LL NOW PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
07:58:04 >>DANNY COLLINS:
DANNY COLLINS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
I'VE BEEN SWORN IN.
OUR LAST CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT
AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE.
REY PARK IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET SOUTH OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED 370 FEET SOUTHWEST OF
THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
THE STOP SERVED BY HART ROUTE 7 AND 14 CONNECTING THE
SUBJECT SITE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY
COLLEGE, THE YUKON TRANSFER CENTER AND BRITTON PLAZA.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTY.
YOU'LL SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ST. CONRAD STREET JUST EAST
OF NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.

THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL.
THERE ARE SOME NONRESIDENTIAL USES ALONG NORTH HOWARD AVENUE
AS WELL AS NORTH ALBANY AVENUE.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE SUBJECT SITE INCLUDING PARCELS TO THE NORTH, EAST,
SOUTH, AND WEST OF THE SITE, RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION.
THIS DESIGNATION ALLOWS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
PARCEL AND A HALF WEST OF THE SITE TOWARDS, AS YOU MOVE
TOWARDS NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
LAND RECOGNIZED UNDER CMU 35 DESIGNATION.
AS YOU MOVE SOUTH ON HOWARD AVENUE, LAND RECOGNIZED UNDER
THE CC 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND
NO ADVERSE IMPACTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THIS PORTION OF THE WEST ST. CONRAD BETWEEN NORTH HOWARD
AVENUE AND NORTH ALBANY AVENUE HAS EXISTING DENSITY OF 10.21
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE EXISTING DENSITY IS 29% OF THE DENSITY THAT CAN BE
CONSIDERED UNDER THE R 35 DESIGNATION.
THE PD PROPOSES A DENSITY OF 18.75 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUEST IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE
RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE ORIENTATION OF THE
FRONT DOOR WITH NEIGHBORHOOD, SIDEWALK AND STREET.
THE REQUEST SATISFIES THIS POLICY BY PROVIDING FRONT DOOR
FACING SAINT CONRAD STREET.
VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROVIDED FROM AN ALLEY LOCATED ALONG THE
SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS ENCOURAGED BY
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
FINALLY, THE REQUEST SUPPORTS POLICIES IN THE PLANS RELATED
TO HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND
UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING
IS AVAILABLE TO MEET TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION.
BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND
POLICIES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
08:01:00 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
08:01:08 >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
ZAIN HUSAIN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE, THE SUBJECT PARCEL HERE OUTLINED IN RED ON WEST
SAINT CONRAD STREET.
TO THE NORTH YOU'LL HAVE WEST ST. LOUIS STREET AND WEST
SAINT JOHN STREET.

TO THE WEST YOU'LL HAVE NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
TO THE EAST YOU'LL HAVE NORTH ALBANY AVENUE AND TO THE SOUTH
YOU'LL HAVE WEST BEACH STREET.
THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY THE ZONE RS 50 AND ALL OF THE
UNITS AROUND THE PARCEL ARE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
I'LL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY
WITH THREE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 7,174 SQUARE FEET OR
.16 ACRES.
IT'S LOCATED ON WEST ST. CONRAD STREET TO THE NORTH.
THE SITE IS WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
THE PROPOSED PARKING IS SEVEN PARKING SPACES AND THE CODE
STATES THAT SEVEN PARKING SPACES ARE NEEDED.
SO THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET.
AS YOU'LL SEE, VEHICULAR ACCESS COMES FROM THE SOUTH
ALLEYWAY TO THE SOUTH, AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE DETACHED
CARPORTS FROM THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE FOR THESE PARKING
SPACES.
THE PROPOSED HEIGHT IS 35 FEET IN HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE.
I WILL SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AND ON THE REVISION SHEET, THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE
DIRECTIONAL LABELS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST FOR EACH OF
THESE STRUCTURES.
FRONT FACING, YOU'LL SEE THE ACCESS WAY TO THE DETACHED

GARAGE.
YOU'LL HAVE THE FRONT FACING THE ALLEYWAY OF THE DETACHED
GARAGE ALSO HERE.
FACING THE WEST SAINT CONRAD STREET, YOU'LL SEE THE FRONT OF
THE STRUCTURE OF THE THREE UNITS HERE ATTACHED.
AND ALSO ANOTHER VIEW FOR THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURES
TOWARDS WEST SAINT CONRAD.
AS I WENT OUT AND TOOK PICTURES MYSELF, I'LL SHOW YOU WHAT I
SAW.
THIS IS THE SITE AS-IS, VACANT.
AS YOU WILL SEE THE SIGN IN THE FRONT.
TO THE WEST YOU'LL HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USES UP
AND DOWN THE WEST, WEST SAINT CONRAD.
TO THE NORTH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND TO THE EAST
YOU'LL HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RUNNING UP ALONG THE
EAST SIDE OF WEST SAINT CONRAD.
THERE ARE THREE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED, AND THESE ARE FROM
NATURAL RESOURCES AND URBAN DESIGN.
THE FIRST REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FIVE-FOOT USE
LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO THE EAST AND WEST TO FOUR AND A HALF
FEET AND ONE AND A HALF FEET, 4.5 AND 1.6.
THE SECOND IS TO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 20% VUA
GREENSPACE TO 8% SUBJECT TO LANDSCAPE IN LIEU OF FEES AT THE
TIME OF PERMITTING.
AND THE THIRD IS TO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK

FROM THE REQUIRED SEVEN FOOT TEN TO SIX FOOT EIGHT.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION,
THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
08:06:19 >>BILL CARLSON:
IS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE WEST TAMPA
OVERLAY?
08:06:23 >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
CORRECT, IT IS CONSISTENT.
08:06:24 >>BILL CARLSON:
THE WAIVERS RESPONSE TO OVERLAY OR IS IT THE
ZONING?
08:06:31 >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
THE ONE WAIVER HERE, NUMBER THREE, REQUESTS
TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK THAT IS FOR URBAN DESIGN.
AND THE TWO ABOVE THAT ARE FOR NATURAL RESOURCES.
08:06:45 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
08:06:58 >> GOOD EVENING.
RALPH SCHULER, 2401 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE.
I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN.
08:07:03 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS THE GENTLEMAN BEHIND YOU GOING TO BE
GIVING ANY TESTIMONY?
08:07:08 >> I DON'T THINK SO.
08:07:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DON'T THINK SO OR NO.
JUST TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE.

[OATH ADMINISTERED]
08:07:24 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
08:07:26 >> I WANTED TO TOUCH ON A COUPLE OF PRETTY EASY THINGS.
I THINK IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD PROJECT, OF COURSE.
FIRST, THE WAIVERS, THE WAIVERS -- WE HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM ON
BOTH SIDES OF THE UNIT, WHERE THE WAIVERS ARE, IS WE HAVE TO
SLIDE IN A VISITOR SPACE HERE.
SO WE HAVE FOUR AND A HALF FEET ONLY AT THE GARAGE DETACHED
GARAGE.
ON BOTH SIDES, I HAVE SIX FEET HERE.
AGAIN, WE HAVE A TREE HERE THAT WE'RE SLIDING THE STRUCTURE
OVER TO PROTECT THAT TREE, AND THEN THE 1.6 IS THIS
DIMENSION, WHICH IS REALLY ONLY THE VISITOR SPOT ON THE LAST
18 FEET OF THE LOT.
THE SECOND IS A VUA GREENSPACE.
TECHNICALLY, BECAUSE THIS IS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WE
HAVE TO MEET A DESIGN CRITERIA OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
WHICH REQUIRES VUA.
WELL, VUA REALLY DOESN'T APPLY HERE VERY WELL BECAUSE WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT A VUA IN AN ALLEY, NOT ON THE FRONT.
ALL OF OUR PARKING IS IN THE ALLEY AND, OF COURSE, TO GET
ALL THAT PARKING IN, WE NEED MOST OF THE WIDTH OF THE LOT.
WE'RE HAPPY TO PLAY THE IN LIEU FEE.
WE'LL HAVE GREENSPACE HERE, HERE, HERE, AND A LITTLE BIT
THERE.

AGAIN, TO THE ALLEY.
LASTLY, I BELIEVE THIS WAS A WAIVER REQUESTED LAST MINUTE
FROM URBAN DESIGN, WHICH IS WE CALCULATED A SETBACK LOT
AVERAGING A LITTLE LESS THAN THEY DID.
I THINK WE'RE HAPPY TO ACTUALLY PROVIDE THE 7'10" VERSUS THE
6'8", NOT A BIG DEAL.
WE'LL GET WITH STAFF AND DECIDE IF THAT IS A WAIVER WE CAN
REMOVE.
OTHER THAN THAT, AGAIN, AN EMPTY LOT THAT IS UNDERUTILIZED
IN THE WAY OF DENSITY WE COULD HAVE ASKED FOR FIVE UNITS.
BUT SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED IS MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE
NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WE BELIEVE THAT THIS WOULD BE CONTRIBUTING
TO THE WEST TAMPA -- CONSISTENT WITHIN THE URBAN DESIGN
CRITERIA IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
WITH THAT, I'LL TAKE QUESTIONS.
08:09:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
SEEING NONE, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
08:09:54 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT I APPRECIATE YOUR
FOCUSING THE PARKING IN THE BACK AND THE RESIDENTIAL IN
FRONT TO TRY TO MAINTAIN A FRONT YARD CONSISTENCY WITH THE
REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT IS NOTED.
08:10:15 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK TO AGENDA NUMBER 10?

FILE REZ-23-02.
SEEING NONE, WE HAVE NO ONE ONLINE.
08:10:25 >> MOVE TO CLOSE.
08:10:26 >> SECOND.
08:10:26 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:10:32 >> AYE.
08:10:32 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
08:10:34 >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ-23-02,
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
2132 WEST SAINT CONRAD STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA,
AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,
TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY,
ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, INCLUDING THE
REVISIONS AND WAIVER SHEETS AND BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAS
MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL
EVIDENCE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED AND SHOWN IN
THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
CITY CODE, THAT I FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND THE GENERAL

WELFARE.
ALSO, LIKE TO SAY AS STAFF NOTED, THIS PARCEL IS CURRENTLY
VACANT AND SURROUNDED BY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
WITH THAT IN MIND, I FIND THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS
CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2 AND HOUSING POLICIES
1.3.1, 1.3.3 AND 1.3.4, WHICH ENCOURAGE NEW HOUSING ON
VACANT AND UNDER UTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY
OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET TAMPA'S NEEDS.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR
ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATE IN COMPATIBILITY WITH
SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
08:11:56 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
08:12:03 >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
08:12:04 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
08:12:05 >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
08:12:07 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
08:12:08 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
08:12:10 >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
08:12:11 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
08:12:12 >>THE CLERK:
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 2nd,
2023, AT 9:30 A.M.
08:12:23 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

08:12:24 >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:12:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
INFORMATION AND REPORTS.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
08:12:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NONE, SIR.
08:12:30 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
08:12:31 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
REQUEST THAT STAFF PRESENT THE LIST OF
SURPLUS PROPERTIES DEEMED APPROPRIATE FOR AFFORDABLE
HOUSING, AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 166.0451, TO BE
BROUGHT BACK TO CITY COUNCIL FOR REGULAR SESSION MARCH 2,
2023.
08:12:43 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
08:12:48 >>LYNN HURTAK:
NOTHING.
08:12:50 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
08:12:51 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HAVE A FEW MOTIONS.
I WAS GOING TO WISH MARTIN SHELBY A HAPPY EARLY BIRTHDAY BUT
WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY NEXT WEEK ON THE 19th.
MOTION NUMBER ONE, I HAVE A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO REMOVE TA/CPA 22-25 FROM THE FEBRUARY 23rd,
2023 5:01 P.M. ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING.
08:13:15 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?

08:13:20 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE NEXT MOTION IS A REQUEST BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET AN ADOPTION HEARING FOR TA/CPA
22-25 ON MARCH 23rd, 2023 AT 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK WITH THE FORMAL
NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
08:13:37 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:13:41 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE FINAL ONE IS A REQUEST BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO REMOVE TA/CPA 22-13 FROM THE JUNE 8,
2023, 5:01 P.M. ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING.
08:13:51 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:14:00 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
08:14:01 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
08:14:02 >>LUIS VIERA:
YEAH, VERY BRIEFLY.
COMMENDATION, NICE GENTLEMAN, LUIS CAMPUZANO, PART OWNER OF
CRABBY BILLS, BAY OF PIGS VETERAN, NAVY VETERAN.
PASSED ON.
WANTED TO GIVE HIS FAMILY A COMMENDATION IN HIS MEMORY
TOMORROW HERE AT CITY HALL.
08:14:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO -- EXCUSE

ME, MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:14:30 >>LUIS VIERA:
SECOND IF I MAY, AND LASTLY, IT WAS BROUGHT TO
MY ATTENTION BY A NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS HERE IN TAMPA,
INDIAN AMERICANS WITH THE GAME CRICKET, AND THEY ARE LOOKING
FOR PLACES THEY CAN PLAY CRICKET IN OUR CITY FIELDS.
SO I WANTED TO ASK OUR FRIENDS AT PARKS AND RECREATION IF
THEY CAN IDENTIFY EITHER EXISTING LOCATIONS WITHIN PARKS AND
RECREATION OR FIELDS OR GREENSPACES, ET CETERA, OR
ALTERNATIVELY, SITES THAT CAN BE USED IN THE FUTURE AND THEY
CAN COME BACK ON THAT FOR CRICKET IN, WHAT ARE WE, FEBRUARY,
MAN, THE FIRST WEEK IN MAY.
IF THEY NEED MORE TIME, I CAN GIVE THEM MORE TIME.
LET'S LET THEM KNOW, RIGHT?
08:15:12 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:15:19 >>LUIS VIERA:
THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
08:15:20 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
08:15:21 >>BILL CARLSON:
NOTHING, THANK YOU.
08:15:22 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I HAVE A REQUEST, COUNCIL.
YOU REMEMBER THE HELICOPTER ACCIDENT THAT HAPPENED OFF OF
DAVIS ISLANDS WHERE OUR BUCCANEERS QUARTERBACK GABBERT AND

HIS BROTHERS RESCUED THE FOUR PEOPLE.
I'VE JUST BEEN INFORMED BY BRIAN FORD THAT THE ONLY DAY THAT
WE CAN GET ALL OF THEM TOGETHER TO PRESENT THE COMMENDATION
TO THEM WOULD BE FEBRUARY 23rd.
08:15:48 >> THAT'S A BUSY WORKSHOP DAY.
08:15:52 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM CHAIRMAN CITRO
WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANYTHING ELSE?
08:15:57 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AND IT WILL BE JUST FIVE MINUTES.
08:16:02 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WHAT IF YOU WANT PICTURES AND
AUTOGRAPHS?
I'M KIDDING.
08:16:05 >>BILL CARLSON:
IF WE WANT TO SAVE TIME, WE CAN MOVE THE
PIER DISCUSSION UNTIL AFTER MAY 1st.
08:16:13 >>LUIS VIERA:
SECOND.
08:16:14 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO, NO.
WE'RE KEEPING THAT ONE.
WE'RE KEEPING THAT ONE.
08:16:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS.
NUMBER ONE --
08:16:21 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE DID TAKE THE VOTE ON THAT, CORRECT?
08:16:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DID YOU TAKE THE VOTE?
OKAY.
THANK YOU.

A COUPLE OF THINGS, NUMBER ONE, WITH REGARD TO THE WORKSHOP
ON THE 23rd, IT IS A VERY FULL WORKSHOP.
MY SUGGESTION PERHAPS IS TO ASK THE ADMINISTRATION TO WORK
WITH THE CHAIR TO ACTUALLY GROUP THESE IN WAYS THAT WE CAN
MOVE THEM ALONG AND DO IT IN A WAY --
08:16:41 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SOUNDS GOOD.
I WILL ASK STAFF TO DO THAT.
08:16:47 >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, MR. CHAIR, AND IF I HAVE ANY, OR IF
ANY OF US, I DON'T KNOW WHAT I MAY HAVE ON THAT DAY.
WE CAN LOOK AT THEM INDIVIDUALLY AND MAYBE DOWN THE ROAD,
WHATEVER.
08:16:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF YOU CAN, COUNCIL.
ALSO, ONE LAST THING, WHILE I HAVE YOU ALL HERE, THIS WILL
TAKE ONE MINUTE OR LESS.
WITH REGARD TO CONTINUANCES, THIS BEING A REZONING NIGHT,
IT'S RELEVANT.
BUT WITH REGARD TO REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE, I HAD PREPARED
CHANGES TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE, BUT A QUESTION CAME UP,
COUNCIL, WHERE THE COUNCIL WANTED TO INCORPORATE INTO THAT A
FIRST CONTINUANCE AS A MATTER OF RIGHT, AS LONG AS THEY GIVE
LET'S SAY ONE WEEK'S NOTICE, AT LEAST ONE WEEK'S NOTICE, DID
COUNCIL WANT TO, BECAUSE IN THAT CASE, IT WOULD APPEAR ON
THE DRAFT AGENDA THAT THE REQUEST HAD BEEN CONTINUED.
SO THE QUESTION IS, DOES COUNCIL WANT TO HAVE THE FIRST
CONTINUANCE AS A MATTER OF RIGHT OR DO YOU WANT THE PROCESS

TO BE THE WAY, THE FIRST ONE NOT NECESSARILY, NONE OF THEM
WOULD ACTUALLY BE AS A MATTER OF RIGHT.
NORMALLY COUNCIL, IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT NORMALLY COUNCIL
HAS BEEN GRANTING THE FIRST CONTINUANCE REALLY WITHOUT MUCH
DISCUSSION AND DEBATE.
SO WHAT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE?
A CONSENSUS IF YOU HAVE IT, IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT, WE
CAN TALK ABOUT IT NEXT WEEK.
BUT I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO GET A DIRECTION ON THAT
BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO INCORPORATE IT IF THAT'S YOUR
INTENTION.
08:18:10 >>LYNN HURTAK:
I ALWAYS FEEL LIKE EVERYONE SHOULD GET A
SECOND OPPORTUNITY.
SO I DON'T REALLY HAVE A PROBLEM.
ONE CONTINUANCE IS NO BIG DEAL.
08:18:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT IS FINE.
THAT'S THE DIRECTION I'M LOOKING FOR.
08:18:25 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
08:18:26 >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I FORGOT, ROBERT IRVING, WHO SITS ON OUR
CITIZEN BOARD, PASSED AWAY.
HIS SERVICE WAS TODAY.
GOOD FRATERNITY BROTHER OF MINE.
I WANTED TO MAKE SURE I RECOGNIZED HIM.
I DID HAVE THE OFFICE SEND A RESOLUTION OVER TO THE FAMILY.
BUT SINCE HE DID SERVE ON OUR CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD, CRITICAL

BOARD, I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE A COMMENDATION TO HIS FAMILY AND
PRESENT IT TO THEM.
08:18:59 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES,
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
ALL IN FAVOR?
08:19:05 >> AYE.
08:19:05 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYTHING ELSE?
08:19:06 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
08:19:08 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE --
08:19:12 >> [INAUDIBLE]
08:19:17 >>LUIS VIERA:
THAT'S FINE.
AGAIN, IF PARKS AND REC NEEDS MORE TIME, IT'S ALL GOOD.
THANK YOU.
08:19:22 >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
08:19:23 >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
08:19:35 >> AYE.
08:19:37 >> ARE WE ADJOURNED?
[MEETING ADJOURNED]

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.