TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2023
5:01 P.M

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.

05:03:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IS NOW IN SESSION.
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:03:10PM >>LUIS VIERA:
HERE.
05:03:13PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
05:03:14PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HERE.
05:03:16PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
HERE.
05:03:20PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:03:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
LET'S GO THROUGH THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME, PLEASE.
MR. HUSSEIN.
05:03:30PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SOME -- TO CLEAR THE AGENDA.
FIRST ITEM NUMBER -- AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR.
FILE NO. REZ-22-44.
PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM THE AGENDA.
IT WILL BE SET AT A LATER DATE.
05:03:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY -- WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
05:04:20PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX IS REQUESTING A
CONTINUANCE, FILE NO. REZ-22-108.
THEY ARE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO JUNE 8.
05:04:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SO MOVED.
05:04:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS POYNOR, I AM GOING TO BE ASKING IF
ANYONE HAS ANY OBJECTIONS?
ITEM NUMBER SIX, FILE NO. REZ-22-108.
MR. SHELBY?
05:04:50PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
JUST A POINT, MR. CHAIRMAN.
YOU HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
IS NOT GOING TO BE PRESENT HERE TONIGHT DUE TO SOME ISSUES
THAT PREVENT THAT PERSON FROM BEING HERE WITHOUT GETTING
INTO SPECIFICS, BUT EVEN WITH PEOPLE'S OBJECTION, THIS CASE
CANNOT BE HEARD TONIGHT.
IT CAN NOT GO FORWARD.
IT WILL BE CONTINUED.
IF THEY WANT TO SPEAK TO THE DATE, THEY CAN, BUT IN TERMS OF
OBJECTING TO A CONTINUANCE, UNLESS THERE IS A REASON THEY
HAVE STANDING THAT THEY WANT TO DO THAT FOR PURPOSES OF THE
RECORD, THAT IS ONE THING.
BUT THIS CASE CANNOT BE HEARD TONIGHT.
05:05:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT?
05:05:36PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MIND YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND MEMBERS OF
COUNCIL, THAT IS ONLY TO, I GUESS, THE DATE OF THE
CONTINUANCE FRANKLY.
AND WITH REGARD TO THE MERITS OF THE CASE, I WOULD REMIND
COUNCIL AND ALSO MEMBERS OF PUBLIC IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO
SPEAK TO THE FACTS OR THE MERIT OF THE CASE AT THIS TIME
BECAUSE IT CAN NOT BE HEARD.
05:05:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. SHELBY, A COUNCILPERSON WHO IS GOING TO
ABSTAIN THEMSELVES.
DO THAT NOW OR BEFORE THE CASE WILL BE HEARD AT A FUTURE
DATE?
05:06:06PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MY SUGGESTION IS BECAUSE IT IS NOT A
MINISTERIAL ITEM AND DOES HAVE SIGNIFICANCE.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, IT IS APPROPRIATE IF YOU
HAVE AT APPEARANCE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST OR BASIS TO
ABSTAIN YOU DO SO AT THIS TIME PRIOR TO THE CONTINUANCE.
05:06:22PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I AM ABSTAINING ON THIS QUASI JUDICIAL TO
AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND TO HAVE A
HEARING FREE OF POTENTIAL BIAS AND PREJUDICE.
05:06:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU HAVE A FORM IN THAT REGARD.
05:06:38PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE THE FORM HERE.
05:06:39PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
RECEIVED AND FILE.
05:06:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
05:06:48PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
CHAIRMAN.
05:06:56PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THERE IS A REASON THAT THE APPLICANT IS NOT
HERE THAT PRECLUDES HERE.
05:07:01PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THAT CAN'T BE STATED ON THE RECORD.
05:07:03PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I JUST STATED IT.
YOU WOULD LIKE THE ACTUAL REASON.
I CAN STATE.
THERE IS A MEDICAL ISSUE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN A MEMO THAT HE
SENT TO COUNCIL.
05:07:12PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, SIR.
05:07:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK
TO THE DATE?
MR. HUSSEIN, WHAT WAS THAT DATE AGAIN?
05:07:26PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE REQUEST IS TO MOVE THIS TO JUNE 8.
05:07:33PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AT 5:01 P.M.?
05:07:36PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
AT 5:01 P.M.
05:07:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THE DATE OF THIS
CONTINUANCE OF FILE NUMBER 22-108.
05:07:45PM >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS STEPHANIE POYNOR, I HAVE
STANDING WITH THIS.
I OWN A PROPERTY 250 FEET OF THE PROPERTY.
WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT HEARD BEFORE THIS COUNCIL RETIRES
AND THE NEXT COUNCIL IS HEARD.
WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT HEARD BEFORE MAY 1.
IF NOT, WE CAN LIVE WITH THE JUNE 8.
I HAVE ABOUT 25 OR 30 PEOPLE WHO WILL BE ATTENDING THE
HEARING.
I ASKED THEM NOT TO COME UNTIL LATER BECAUSE NOBODY WANTS TO
SIT HERE AND WAIT FOR NUMBER SIX TO COME ALONG.
THANK YOU.
05:08:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBER WHO WOULD LIKE TO
SPEAK TO THAT DATE?
05:08:25PM >> MY NAME IS MICHAEL McNABB, 2404 SOUTH CLARK AVENUE,
33629.
I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE AGENDA ITEM MOVED TO JUNE 6 AS
PROPOSED --
05:08:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
JUNE 8.
05:08:41PM >> SORRY, JUNE 8.
I AM NOT GOING TO BE AVAILABLE IN MAY.
AND I HAVE ADVISED MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE GOING TO
COME TONIGHT.
WE WERE PREPARED TO SPEAK TO THIS, AND I ADVISED THEM THAT IT
WAS GOING TO BE CONTINUED.
NOT ANYBODY I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
THAT IS IT PREPARED TO PRESENT TONIGHT.
I WILL ASK YOU TO USE THAT DATE AND WE WILL BE PREPARED TO
SPEAK AT THAT TIME.
05:09:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS?
WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
05:09:20PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WE HAVEN'T ANNOUNCED BY THE CLERK.
YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THAT -- CAN WE HAVE AN ANNOUNCE.
05:09:34PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MADAM CLERK.
05:09:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD.
05:09:38PM >>CLERK:
CONTINUANCE WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 8 AT 5:01 P.M.
05:09:43PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AGAIN THE VOTE WAS --
05:09:46PM >>CLERK:
OKAY.
05:09:47PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE REASON I ASK IS BECAUSE THERE WAS
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK ABSTAINED.
05:09:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT PLEASE.
05:10:00PM >>CLERK:
CONTINUANCE WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 8 AT 5:01 P.M.
MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK ABSTAINING.
05:10:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:10:14PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WANT TO STAY TO MISS POYNOR'S REQUEST, THE
ONLY DAY LEFT -- IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NEXT WEEK OR --
05:10:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
APRIL 27.
05:10:28PM >>BILL CARLSON:
APRIL 27 AT NIGHT.
I PRESUME WE COULDN'T HAVE DONE THAT, RIGHT?
05:10:34PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT DATE HAVEN'T BEEN CONSIDERED.
I DON'T KNOW.
THAT WASN'T DISCUSSED WITH STAFF.
MY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT WASN'T DISCUSSED BY STAFF.
BUT IT HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNLESS AT THIS POINT IN TIME --
AND YOU HAD PEOPLE SPEAK TO IT.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE AVAILABILITY OF -- OF THE APPLICANT'S
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THAT DATE IN APRIL.
I AM NOT AWARE OF IT.
05:10:53PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THANK YOU.
05:10:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HUSSEIN.
05:11:06PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
NEXT ITEM REQUESTING CONTINUANCE IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
SEVEN.
FILE NO. REZ-22-126 REQUESTING IS CONTINUANCE TO JUNE 8.
05:11:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS THE SAME
APPLICANT.
AND REASONS ARE THE SAME?
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
IS THERE A SECOND?
05:11:33PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
05:11:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WISHES TO SPEAK TO
CONTINUANCE DATE SEVEN.
05:11:48PM >> MY APOLOGIES.
I WAS SPEAKING OF NUMBER EIGHT.
8008 INTERBAY AND THAT IS THE -- THE ONE THAT I AM -- I WAS
NOTIFIED ON.
AND I WOULD STILL LIKE TO SEE IT HAPPEN BEFOREHAND.
I PREFER THAT WE NOT HAVE TO TALK TO A NEW COUNCIL FOR WEEKS
ON END BEFORE IT GETS HEARD.
THANK YOU.
05:12:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, MAKER OF THE MOTION --
COUNCILMAN VIERA, STILL JUNE 8?
05:12:25PM >>LUIS VIERA:
MR. SHELBY, WHERE DID THE JUNE 8 COME FROM.
AGREED TO STAFF AND THE APPLICANT.
05:12:32PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE ANSWER TO THAT A PROBABILITY ON JUNE 8
AND WAS ACCEPTABLE TO THE APPLICANT.
05:12:37PM >>LUIS VIERA:
AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO ISSUE OF NEW
COUNCIL.
HAS NO BEARING WHATSOEVER WITH THE RECORD.
I WANT TO SEE WHAT STAFF DID WITH THE APPLICANT.
I DON'T WANT TO TAKE SIDES AND ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE.
I WANT TO BE VERY CAREFUL WITH THESE THINGS.
THAT IS MY RATIONALE.
05:12:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THE SECOND ON THE MOTION WAS COUNCILMAN
GUDES.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO?
MIRANDA?
OKAY.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
05:13:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DATE AND TIME ON THAT, PLEASE.
05:13:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
DATE AND TIME, PLEASE.
05:13:16PM >>CLERK:
THE MOTION -- THE CASE WILL CARRY TO JUNE 8 AT 5:01
P.M.
05:13:23PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
05:13:24PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
NEXT ITEM REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE IS AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.
FILE NO. REZ-23-04.
IT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO JUNE 8 AT 5:01 P.M.
05:13:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I HAVE THE SAME APPLICANT, SAME REASON,
CORRECT?
05:13:43PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
CORRECT.
05:13:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:13:48PM >>BILL CARLSON:
A REASON WE CAN'T MOVE THAT TO APRIL 27.
05:13:52PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
APRIL 27 IS AN AB 2 NIGHT.
ALCOHOL NIGHT.
WE HAVE BEEN KEEPING THEM ON THE SAME TRACK AS THE REZONING
NIGHTS.
05:14:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
AGAIN, THAT WAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH THE
APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE AND TWO OF
THOSE CASES THAT ARE BEING CONTINUED HAVE ALREADY BEEN
CONTINUED TO JUNE 8.
05:14:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:14:13PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I CAN'T SPEAK TO HIS AVAILABILITY.
05:14:17PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
WILL THESE HAVE TO BE --
05:14:20PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
THESE ARE CONTINUANCES.
05:14:24PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM MOVING IT TO THE 27th.
EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCE BUT THAT'S JUST --
05:14:32PM >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY.
SO -- MAY I, SIR.
05:14:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
05:14:36PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I WANT TO CONFIRM WITH MR. SHELBY.
I -- THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WAS AGREED TO WITH STAFF AND THE
APPLICANT, CORRECT?
IN TERMS OF JUNE 8.
BECAUSE I WANT TO KNOW WHERE THESE DATES COME FROM.
05:14:48PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE DATE COMES FROM THE SECOND THURSDAY OF
EVERY MONTH HAS A NIGHT MEETING FOR REZONINGS.
THE FOURTH MEETING OF THE MONTH IS RESERVED FOR SPECIAL USE
FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND PERHAPS FUTURE LAND USE MAP
AMENDMENTS OR TEXT AMENDMENTS.
THAT IS JUST THE STANDARD PROCESS.
I SUSPECT WHAT THE CLERK -- EXCUSE ME WHAT THE STAFF LOOKED
AT AND MISS DOCK IS PRESENT.
I SPOKE WITH MISS DOCK THIS MORNING.
TWO DATES DISCUSSED.
THE ONE IN MAY WHICH IS THE NEXT AVAILABLE TUESDAY, SECOND
TUESDAY, OR THE ONE IN JUNE, THE JUNE 8 DATE.
SPEAKING WITH MR. MICHELINI, HE HAD INDICATED HIS PREFERENCE
FOR THE JUNE CATEGORY.
AND ON THAT BASIS, THERE WAS AVAILABILITY FOR THAT DATE.
AND WHETHER IT WAS THE MAY DATE OR THE JUNE DATE.
THE DATE IN APRIL WAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH EITHER STAFF OR
DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE.
05:15:47PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I JUST -- HOW CAN I PUT THIS.
TO ME THIS SHOULD BE A PLAIN VANILLA PROCESS THAT HAS NO
BEARING ON WHAT COUNCILMEMBERS WILL HEAR IT.
TO ME WHEN THAT GETS BROUGHT UP AND CITY COUNCIL ACTS BASED
UPON THAT TO ME IS TROUBLING FOR ME, FOR THIS GUY RIGHT
HERE.
A LITTLE TROUBLING.
I WANT TO GO THROUGH THE PLAIN VANILLA PROCESS.
BLINDERS ON.
NOT LOOKING WHO IS DEALING WITH IT, ETC.
THESE CASES HAVE TO BE HANDLED IN A CERTAIN WAY AS FAR AS I
SEE IT.
SET IT UP IN TWO WEEKS AND SOMETHING THAT IS ACCORDING TO
NORMAL STANDARD PROCESS AND PROCEDURE, I AM FINE WITH IT.
TWO MONTHS, I DON'T CARE.
SO LONG AS THE PROCESS IS FOLLOWED.
05:16:27PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
IF YOU DO IT TONIGHT, YOU WILL DO IT
WITHOUT ANY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE STATUS OF THE
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE IS RELATIVE TO THAT DATE.
THAT BEING THE CASE, I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU THAT IF THERE
WERE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES, FOR INSTANCE, IF THIS CASE
WAS A CONTINUED CASE AND A LOT OF FACTS ALREADY IN EVIDENCE
AND IT WAS A SUBSTANTIALLY LARGE RECORD AND IT HAD TO BE
DONE AND IT WAS VERY TIME SENSITIVE, THEN ONE COULD MAKE
THAT CASE.
BUT I HAVE NOT HEARD THAT OR -- UNLESS COUNCIL FEELS THAT IS
NEXT.
05:16:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:17:00PM >>BILL CARLSON:
BUT FOR A CONTINUANCE, WE ASK FOR THE PUBLIC
TO GIVE INPUT AND YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO THE PUBLIC ONLY GIVE
-- BECAUSE IT HAS TO BE CONTINUED.
I AM PARAPHRASING.
THEY CAN ONLY GIVE INPUT AS TO THE JUNE 8 DATE.
THEY GAVE INPUT TO SAY -- AT LEAST ONE SAID -- I DON'T KNOW
WHO ALL IS GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
THEY SPOKE ON THE OTHER ITEM.
IF THE PUBLIC SAYS WE WOULD RATHER HAVE APRIL 27 ARE.
WE DON'T WANT JUNE 8, WHAT DO WE DO?
THE PUBLIC CAME HERE TO GIVE INPUT AND SUPPOSED TO TAKE
INPUT.
WHY CAN'T WE PUT IT ON THE DATE THAT THE PUBLIC WANTS.
05:17:40PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
BECAUSE, FIRST OF ALL, IT IS THE APPLICANT
WHO HAS THE BURDEN HERE OF HAVING TO PUT THEIR CASE FORWARD.
THAT IS NUMBER ONE.
BUT NUMBER TWO, AND MORE IMPORTANT, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT --
WELL, LET ME REPHRASE IT.
I SHARE COUNCILMAN VIERA'S CONCERN.
IT ALMOST APPEARS IN THE COURT FORUM SHOPPING.
AND THAT --
05:18:09PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT IF THEY WANT TO PUT IT ON SEPTEMBER 8
INSTEAD OF JUNE.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF TAKING PUBLIC INPUT IF WE CAN'T USE
IT.
05:18:18PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THAT IS A FAIR QUESTION.
THE QUESTION IS, IF THE REASON THAT SOMEBODY CONTINUES
SOMETHING IS THE APPLICANT JUST DOESN'T -- THE ROOM IS TOO
FULL OR TOO MANY THINGS ON THE AGENDA, IF IT IS FOR THAT
SORT OF REASON, COUNCIL IN THE PAST HAVE TAKEN THE -- THE --
TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT THE PEOPLE WHO WERE HERE TO BE ABLE TO
TESTIFY TO THIS.
AND THEN COUNCIL IN THE PAST HAVE WAIVED THAT AGAINST THE
REASON THAT THE PETITIONER WANTS THE CONTINUANCE.
AND TIMES THAT IT IS WEIGHED ONE WAY.
AND DEPENDING ON CIRCUMSTANCES, WEIGHED ANOTHER.
IN THIS CASE, THE PETITIONER IN THE OTHER CASES, THE
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE WAS THERE.
AND WAS -- COULD BE -- HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GO FORWARD AND
PRESENT.
AND IN SOME CASES, THEY DID.
BUT IN THIS CASE, THERE IS NO WAY PHYSICALLY IN ANY WAY,
SHAPE OR FORM THIS CASE IS GOING FORWARD TONIGHT.
ONE CAN STATE THEIR OBJECTION PERHAPS TO THE PARTICULAR DATE
THAT IS BEING CHOSEN, BUT ULTIMATELY THE QUESTION IS, IS
THERE A REASON IT CAN'T BE HEARD ON JUNE 8.
I DID NOT HEAR A REASON.
IF COUNCILMEMBERS DID HEAR THAT REASON, IN THAT CASE, THEY
CAN WAIVE THAT.
05:19:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
I BELIEVE THE MOTION IS MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
05:19:39PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I MADE ALL THE MOTIONS.
I -- THIS IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD TAKE US TWO MINUTES AND
--
05:19:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
HAVE WE HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC?
05:19:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
AGAIN -- WE HAVE, BUT WE WILL TRY IT ONE MORE TIME.
ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE DATE OF JUNE 8 BEING THE
CONTINUANCE OF CASE FILE NUMBER LEZ-23-08, AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER EIGHT, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
05:20:07PM >> NUMBER EIGHT?
OKAY.
THAT IS ME.
I WILL TRY IT AGAIN.
IF THE APPLICANT WAS PREPARED TO BE HERE TONIGHT AND DID NOT
HAVE A MEDICAL ISSUE, THEN HE WOULD BE PREPARED FOR THE 27th
OF APRIL.
I AM JUST SAYING.
I HAVE NEIGHBORS DOWNSTAIRS WHO ARE ON THEIR WAY UP.
THEY KNEW THIS WAS NUMBER EIGHT.
I MEAN, I HAVE TESTIFIED THE DAY I HAD SURGERY AT CITY
COUNCIL.
I HAVE MADE THINGS HAPPEN.
SO WHEN NEIGHBORS SPEND TIME AND ENERGY -- AND I KNOW ALL OF
YOU RECEIVED E-MAILS IN PRESIDENT LAST 24, 48 HOURS.
A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF E-MAILS.
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THIS ON THE 27th.
WE HAVE MIXED AB NIGHTS AND LAND USE BEFORE.
IT WOULD NOT BE COMPLETELY AN UNIQUE SITUATION.
I HAVE NEIGHBORS WHO ARE ON THEIR WAY UP.
THEY ARE PARKING NOW.
05:21:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:21:13PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SOMETIMES YOU HAVE UNIQUE SITUATION THAT DO
ARISE.
AND I WOULD AGREE WITH MISS POYNOR, BUT -- THIS IS WHERE IT
GETS STICKY.
MISS DOCK'S OFFICE HAVE BROKERED A DEAL WITH THE APPLICANT
FOR JUNE 8.
LIKE IF I BROKE THE DEAL -- MISS DOCK, I CAN GO ON THE 8th
AND STAFF TOLD HIM THE 8th AND COME BACK THAT THAT DEAL
CAN'T BE BROKEN.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCE WITH THE APPLICANT,
WHETHER THEY WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THE APRIL 27 DATE.
WHAT'S GOING ON.
KIND OF LIKE A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD RIGHT NOW.
AND I FEEL FOR THE CITIZENS WHO ARE -- WHO TAKE THEIR TIME
TO COME AND BE HERE TO BE HEARD, BUT THIS IS A FUNKY
SITUATION.
I WILL BE CORRECT IN SAYING THAT A DEAL WAS BROKERED
PREVIOUSLY.
05:22:08PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THAT IS CORRECT.
I SPOKE WITH THE APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT CONTACTED OUR OFFICE SAYING THAT HE COULD NOT
MAKE IT TO THE HEARING TONIGHT IN PERSON FOR MEDICAL
REASONS.
AND APPLICANTS NORMALLY WILL REACH OUT TO STAFF.
THEY WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE IF THEY
ARE GOING TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE.
WE TYPICALLY SPEAK WITH THE APPLICANTS TO LET THEM KNOW IF
THE AGENDA IS FULL OR NOT.
ALSO, WE KEEP IN MIND, WE HAVE REZONINGS ON REZONING NIGHTS.
ALCOHOL CASES ON ALCOHOL NIGHTS.
COMP PLAN ON ALCOHOL NIGHTS.
STARTING JANUARY 1, THAT WAS THE AGREEMENT HOW WE WOULD
SCHEDULE CASES.
IT IS CERTAINLY UP TO COUNCIL, BUT WHEN I SPOKE WITH THE
APPLICANT, JUNE WAS THE AVAILABLE DATE.
05:22:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:22:58PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THERE IS A WROTE PROBLEM WITH THE SYSTEM AN
WE SOMEHOW HAVE TO CHANGE IT SYSTEMATICALLY, AND I KNOW THE
STATE IS TRYING TO WORK IN THE OTHER DIRECTION, BUT WHAT --
WHAT SOME FOLKS HAVE GOTTEN THE BUSINESS JOURNAL TO WRITE
THAT PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY WANT PREDICTABILITY.
AND THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO KNOW WHAT THE RULES ARE.
THE RULES ARE THERE.
THAT THERE HAS BEEN A LONG PUBLIC PROCESS TO CREATE A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
A LONG PUBLIC PROCESS TO CREATE THE ZONING CODE.
NEIGHBORS IN GOOD FAITH BY HOUSES.
OTHER OWNERS BUY PROPERTY AROUND THESE PROPERTIES IN GOOD
FAITH.
FOR SOME REASON WE CATER TO THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BREAK THE
RULES.
THEY -- AN APPLICATION TO -- TO CHANGE THE ZONING OR CHANGE
THE -- THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SAYING THAT YOU WANT CITY
COUNCIL TO APPROVE BREAKING THE RULES.
AND WHY DO WE GIVE PREFERENCE TO THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO
CHANGE THE RULES VERSUS THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE MADE INVESTMENTS
IN COMMUNITIES.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT, IF THE PUBLIC WANTS A CERTAIN DATE,
WHY WOULDN'T WE GO WITH THAT.
05:24:01PM >>CATE WELLS:
IF I MAY, CATE WELLS, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
I WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT ONE COMMENT.
A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY IS NOT A PERSON'S ATTEMPT TO
BREAK THE RULES.
THE ABILITY TO REZONE PROPERTY IS ALLOWED IN OUR CODE.
THERE IS A PROCESS THAT IS ESTABLISHED IN IF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THAT IS THE PROCESS THAT THAT IS BEING
FOLLOWED HERE.
WITH REGARD TO THE REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE, I BELIEVE THIS
IS THE FIRST REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE FOR THIS APPLICANT.
AND TYPICALLY COUNCIL HAS DEFERRED TO THE DATES THAT THE
APPLICANT REQUESTS.
KEEPING IN MIND THAT THE APPLICANT IS A PARTY TO THAT
APPLICATION.
INTERESTED MEMBERS OF THE ABOUT PUBLIC, HOWEVER INTERESTED
THEY MAY BE, ARE NOT PARTIES TO THAT APPLICATION.
SO WHEN YOU WANT TO PROVIDE DUE PROCESS, YOU HAVE
HISTORICALLY HONORED THE DATE REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT.
05:24:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL?
IS THERE ANY MORE PUBLIC COMMENT ABOUT THE DATE OF AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.
FILE NO. REZ-23-04.
05:25:10PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. CHAIR.
05:25:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
05:25:15PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WILL MOVE TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 27.
05:25:18PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:25:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
COUNCILMAN VIERA, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
05:25:33PM >>LUIS VIERA:
WE HAVE BEEN TOLD BY AN ATTORNEY THERE IS A
PROCESS TO SHOULD GO FORWARD AND WE ARE GOING AGAINST THIS
PROCESS.
I AM NOT MAKING ACCUSATIONS IN TERMS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING
HERE BUT NOT GOOD PRECEDENT.
OUR ATTORNEY HAS BROUGHT UP SOMETHING REGARDING -- I WON'T
CALL IT FORUM SHOPPING BUT SOMETHING AKIN TO THAT.
LET'S GO WITH WHAT THE STATED RULES ARE.
I DON'T CARE WHEN IT IS SET.
I REALLY DON'T CARE IF IT IS THIS WEEK OR NEXT WEEK, BUT
CERTAIN RULES THAT HAVE BEEN GIVEN THAT WE SPENT 20 MINUTES
ON, ON THIS ISSUE.
THIS SHOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE.
THIS IS -- AGAIN, WE ARE -- WE ARE PUTTING ISSUES IN DISPUTE
THAT SHOULDN'T BE IN DISPUTE, RIGHT?
JUST MY BEEN.
05:26:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:26:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
COUNCILMAN VIERA, I HAVE TO AGREE.
RULES ARE RULE.
SINCE I HAVE BEEN HERE PEOPLE ASK FOR A CERTAIN DATE OF
CONTINUANCE WE HAVE DONE THAT.
AND STAFF HAS AGREED WHAT THAT DATE IS.
TODAY TO JUST CHANGE THAT, I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE RIGHT.
AND I -- I COULDN'T SUPPORT THE 27th EVEN THOUGH I
UNDERSTAND -- I LOVE COMMUNITY, BUT YOU DON'T KNOW IF THE
APPLICANT CAN BE HERE ON THE 27th.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE.
THAT WHY I ASKED WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE.
MEDICAL.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT MEDICAL MEANS.
I JUST SAY THAT -- IF THAT IS WHAT THEY PREFER.
MAYBE INDULGE ALL OF THE MEDICAL -- MISS DOCK SAYING THE
8th.
I SAY GO AND MOVE IT TO THE 8th.
SORRY FOR THE COMMUNITY BUT WHEN YOU SAY "MEDICAL" TO ME,
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT.
27th COULD BE A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME THAT THEY STILL CAN'T
BE HERE AND STILL ASK FOR ANOTHER CONTINUANCE.
05:27:08PM >>LUIS VIERA:
MAY I SAY --
05:27:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
05:27:14PM >>LUIS VIERA:
IS THE APPLICANT IS FINE WITH APRIL 27.
I AM HAPPY WITH APRIL 27.
IF THEY ARE HERE WITH TOMORROW, I AM FINE WITH TOMORROW,
WHATEVER IT IS.
I AM NOT GOING TO REPEAT MY REASONS.
05:27:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
WE HAVE A MOTION THAT HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
I THINK WE BETTER TAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE ON THIS.
05:27:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
NO.
05:27:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:27:50PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:27:52PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
NO.
05:27:55PM >>LUIS VIERA:
NO.
05:27:57PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:28:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NO.
05:28:01PM >>CLERK:
MOTION DID NOT PASS.
05:28:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MAY I HAVE ANOTHER MOTION, PLEASE.
05:28:09PM >>CLERK:
WITH MIRANDA, GUDES, VIERA, CITRO VOTING NO.
05:28:17PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 8 TO JUNE
8, 2023 AT 5:01 P.M.
05:28:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ANY DISCUSSION?
05:28:33PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
05:28:35PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:28:37PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:28:38PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
05:28:40PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:28:43PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:28:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:28:45PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
05:28:48PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
PURPOSES FOR THE PUBLIC, MADAM CLERK,
ANNOUNCE THAT DATE, PLEASE.
05:28:55PM >>CLERK:
OKAY.
MOTION -- HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 8 AT 5:01 P.M.
05:29:01PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
05:29:04PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
ZAIN HUSSEIN, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE NEXT ITEM, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 14, CASE REZ-22-95.
PLEASE REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA DUE TO A MISNOTICE.
05:29:15PM >>LUIS VIERA:
SO MOVED.
05:29:17PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
05:29:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
TO REMOVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 14.
FILE NUMBER LEZ-22-95.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
05:29:37PM >>ZAIN HUSSEIN:
LAST, THERE IS A CPA AND REZONING THAT THE
APPLICANT IS HERE, NUMBER 1 AND 12.
I BELIEVE WE HAVE DAVID MECHANIK HERE TO SPEAK ON IT.
05:29:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ARE GOING TO -- BEFORE WE PROCEED ANY
FURTHER.
MR. MECHANIK, I DO APOLOGIZE WITH THIS.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1 AND 12 WILL BE HEARD AT THE SAME TIME
WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, AGENDA ITEM 3 WILL BE HELD AT THE
SAME TIME; HOWEVER, WE HAVE A TALK WITH-ON VERY QUICKLY.
MISS REBECCA JOHNS IS HERE FOR THAT.
COUNCILMAN.
05:30:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
GUDES THIS RELATED TO THE MOTION I WAS
ASKED TOO PRESENT FOR ITEM 15?
05:30:24PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS JOHNS.
05:30:26PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YOU SAY TAKEN AT THE SAME TIME.
MOVE AN ITEM UP TO BE HEARD AFTER ITEM NUMBER 1.
SAME ITEM NUMBER 2 WILL BE HEARD AND THREE AFTER THAT.
05:30:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THAT'S CORRECT.
05:30:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
WALK-ON --.
05:30:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
NOT A WALK-ON ITEM.
AN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 15.
05:30:50PM >>REBECCA JOHNS:
GOOD EVENING, REBECCA JOHNS, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MASTER INFRASTRUCTURE AND
RIVERWALK AGREEMENT FOR ROME YARD.
IF YOU RECALL, WE WERE HERE ON MARCH 23 HAVING THIS FIRST
HEARING.
THERE WAS THEN AN ISSUE WITH THE "TAMPA BAY TIMES" THEY HAVE
NOT PUBLISHED THE NOTICE THAT WE DISCOVERED
AFTER THE HEARING, AND WE ARE HERE TONIGHT TO PRESENT THIS TO
YOU FOR YOUR VOTE.
I WILL JUST BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE AGREEMENT SINCE YOU ARE
ALL VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROJECT.
THE AGREEMENT COVERS FIVE DIFFERENT AREAS.
EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, UPGRADED AND NEW INFRASTRUCTURE,
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERWALK, MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
AND POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE CITY'S EASEMENT.
PART OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WILL BE UPGRADED ARE
STORMWATER SYSTEMS AND ADDITIONAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS.
THE DEVELOPER WILL ALSO BE CONNECTING -- CONSTRUCTING A NEW
PUBLIC ROADWAY THAT CONNECTS WILLOW AVENUE TO OREGON AVENUE
THE MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION IS SET OUT IN EXHIBIT 6 OF THE
AGREEMENT SHOWING THAT THE DEVELOPER OR CITY WILL BE
CONSTRUCTING OR MAINTAINING.
EXHIBIT 2 OF THE AGREEMENT WITH A PHASING AND TIMING PLAN
THAT SETS OUT THE DATES OF ANTICIPATED COMMENCEMENT OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF EACH PHASE AND THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION OF
EACH PHASE.
THAT WILL BE COMING BACK TO YOU ON APRIL 20 AS A SEPARATE
ITEM FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
SO WE ARE JUST ASKING -- YOU DON'T APPROVE ANYTHING TONIGHT.
THIS IS JUST THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.
IF THE PUBLIC HAVE ANY COMMENTS, AND WE ASK THAT PER THE
STATUTE, THE DATE FOR THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 20
BE ANNOUNCED AT THE END OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
THE DEVELOPER IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:32:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
05:32:44PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO
OPEN ALL OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
05:32:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSE?
MOTION CARRIES.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM --
05:33:02PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I AM SORRY --
05:33:15PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
05:33:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS JOHNS HAS GIVEN US THE -- THE
FORMALITIES OF IT, NOW I AM GOING TO ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
05:33:25PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
SORRY I LEFT THE ROOM.
MY APOLOGIES MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
05:33:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WISHES TO SPEAK OF AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 15 WHICH IS BEING HEARD NOW FILE
NUMBER PH-3-80116.
PETITIONER, PLEASE.
05:33:45PM >> JAKE CREMER, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET HERE FOR THE
APPLICANT RELATED URBAN.
I WISH I HAVE A TAYLOR SWIFT SONG --
05:33:59PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SHAKE IT OFF.
05:34:01PM >> THERE YOU GO.
SHAKE IT OFF.
WE HAD A PUBLICATION ISSUE.
WE WILL BE BACK NEXT WEEK FOR THE FINAL APPROVAL.
APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT TONIGHT.
05:34:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYBODY ONLINE THAT WANTED TO SPEAK TO THIS?
I DO NOT BELIEVE SO.
ALL I AM SEEING IS THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVES.
OKAY.
CAN YOU PLEASE ANNOUNCE THE DATE?
05:34:21PM >>CLERK:
YES.
05:34:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PLEASE AND THANK YOU.
05:34:24PM >>CLERK:
SECOND PUBLIC HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20,
2023 AT 10:30 A.M.
05:34:35PM >>REBECCA JOHNS:
THANK YOU.
05:34:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YOU ARE WELCOME.
THE FIRST TWO -- THE FIRST ONE THAT WE ARE GOING TO HEAR
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20.
THAT IS A NONQUASI-JUDICIAL AND I WON'T ASK IF ANYBODY HAS
BEEN SWORN IN.
HOWEVER, IF SOMETHING HAPPENS AND WE HEAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
12 AND THAT IS QUASI-JUDICIAL, AND I WILL BE ASKING FOR
PEOPLE TO BE SWORN IN AT THAT TIME.
SO PETITIONER, FOR FILE NUMBER FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20, AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 1, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
05:35:19PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
WE ARE HERE AT YOUR PLEASURE.
WE WOULD PRESENT ITEM 1 AND 12 TOGETHER OR SEPARATELY.
05:35:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. MECHANIK, I BELIEVE WE HAVE TO HEAR FROM
STAFF FIRST.
05:35:40PM >> I UNDERSTAND.
PEOPLE WERE WAVING ME UP HERE.
IMPLORE THAN HAPPY TO COME UP SECOND.
05:35:46PM >> GOOD EVENING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
MAP AMENDMENT, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20 LOCATED AT 5507 EAST
WASHINGTON STREET.
CAN I ZOOM OUT A LITTLE.
THIS IS A PRIVATELY INITIATED PLAN AMENDMENT.
SMALL SCALE PLAN AMENDMENT.
APPROXIMATELY THREE AND A QUARTER ACRES AND PROPOSAL FROM --
FROM TRANSITIONAL USE-24 TO RESIDENTIAL -- RESIDENTIAL-35.
THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT.
ON THE EAST SIDE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SITE IS
LOCATED IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, EAST WASHINGTON STREET IS LOCATED DIRECTLY
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE.
SOUTH 56th STREET IS LOCATED DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE
SITE.
THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS LOCATED JUST NORTH.
JUST NORTH OF THE SITE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EAST
SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS INDUSTRIAL -- INDUSTRIAL -- IT IS
INDUSTRIAL.
THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE SITE TAKEN OF THE SITE FACING
SOUTH.
AGAIN, PICTURE OF THE SITE LOOKING DOWN SOUTH -- SORRY,
LOOKING DOWN EAST WASHINGTON STREET WEST.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED TO THE LEFT-HAND SIDE OF THE
IMAGE.
AGAIN, PICTURE DOWN EAST WASHINGTON STREET WITH THE SUBJECT
SITE ON THE LEFT -- LEFT-HAND SIDE OF THE IMAGE.
SUBJECT SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OR RIGHT SIDE OF THE IMAGE
LOOKING DOWN EAST WASHINGTON STREET HEADED EAST.
SUBJECT SITE IS TO THE SOUTH.
APPROXIMATELY CENTER OF THE SUBJECT SITE, LOOK -- LOOKING
ACROSS EAST WASHINGTON STREET.
AND THIS IS -- THIS IS A PLAN AMENDMENT TA/CPA 22-24 OR 20.
LET ME DOUBLE CHECK.
22-24 AT THE TIME OF THIS IMAGE CAPTURED.
THIS PARTICULAR SUBJECT SITE WAS BEING CLEARED AND LOCATED
DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET TO NORTHEAST OF THE PROPOSED
SUBJECT SITE THAT 22-20 IS THE SUBJECT NOW.
THE IMAGE FURTHER DOWN LOOKING EAST TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE.
EAST WASHINGTON AS YOU CAN SEE.
THIS IS THE ONLY INGRESS-EGRESS ROUTE OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SUBJECT SITE, AS MENTIONED, IS LOCATED IN THE COASTAL
HIGH HAZARD AREA AND PART OF THIS INGRESS, EGRESS ROUTE IS
ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AS WELL.
THIS IS THE FUTURE -- FUTURE LAND USE MAP CURRENTLY WITH THE
SUBJECT SITE BOUNDED BY THE DARK -- THE DARK BLACK DASHED
LINE.
THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITH THE SUBJECT
SITE AND THE PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE BOUNDED BY THE DARK
DASHED LINE.
IMPACTS.
THE CURRENTLY EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE ALLOWS FOR 28
DWELLING UNITS OR APPROXIMATELY A LITTLE OVER 212 SQUARE
FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES WITH THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND
USE CHANGE.
DWELLING UNITS WILL INCREASE TO ALLOWABLE OF 113.
AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES WOULD DECREASE TO APPROXIMATELY A
LITTLE UNDER 85,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE REQUEST WOULD ELIMINATE THE CONSIDERATION OF LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL AND INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES AS WELL.
WE DID RECEIVE OBJECTIONS FROM TAMPA CITY STAFF.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S NOVEMBER
PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE PLAN
AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STATED THIS PARTICULAR POLICY FOR
CONSISTENCY.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AS WELL.
05:41:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
05:41:07PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIRMAN?
05:41:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:41:22PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IS THE CITY DONE WITH THEIR PRESENTATION?
05:41:25PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
CAN WE CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD.
ARE WE REOPENING THE REZONING WITH THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT?
OKAY, SO JUST --
05:41:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE ARE NOT OPENING IT.
BUT WE WILL --
05:41:42PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
WE WILL HEAR THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FIRST
AND THE REZONING AFTER.
ALL RIGHT.
I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT.
05:41:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:41:50PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
WHAT WERE STAFF'S OBJECTIONS?
05:41:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
FOR THE ZONING OR THE COMP PLAN.
05:41:57PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I THOUGHT WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT THE COMP
PLAN.
SAID THAT THE CITY STAFF HAD OBJECTIONS.
I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE CITY STAFF'S OBJECTION WERE TO THE
COMP PLAN.
05:42:08PM >> GOOD EVENING, FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
OUR OBJECTIONS WERE BASED PRIMARILY ON THE FACT IT WAS ON
THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND ADD ADDITIONAL DENSITY
ADJACENT TO A ROAD THAT HAD NO PLANS TO BE UPGRADED.
05:42:25PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:42:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:42:34PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
IF A ROAD NO PLANS TO BE UPGRADED.
WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROAD?
WHO OWNS THE ROAD NOW?
05:42:47PM >> I BELIEVE IT IS THE CITY'S.
05:42:51PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YOU BELIEVE OR YOU KNOW.
05:42:56PM >> I DO NOT KNOW FOR CERTAIN.
05:42:58PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BELIEVING AND
KNOWING.
05:43:01PM >> THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE.
I WILL HAVE TO CHECK.
BUT I BELIEVE IT IS UNDER THE CITY'S JURISDICTION.
05:43:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
CAN WE HEAR FROM TRANSPORTATION?
05:43:12PM >>JONATHAN SCOTT:
JONATHAN SCOTT, MOBILITY.
THAT ROAD WILL BE UPDATED A REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEVELOPER
REZONING TO THE EAST OF IT.
NOW THIS SAME CONDITION WILL BE PLACED ON THE REZONING FOR
THIS PROPERTY AS WELL.
BUT THAT OTHER PROPERTY IS PROBABLY GOING TO DO IT BEFORE
THIS ONE.
SO THEY HAVE ALREADY PLANS TO UPGRADE THAT ROAD.
05:43:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
05:43:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT.
ANOTHER BUILDING IN THE BACK THAT WAS REZONED TWO WEEKS AGO.
05:43:46PM >> ABOUT RECENTLY.
IT WAS A REQUIREMENT OF THAT REZONING, THAT'S CORRECT.
05:43:50PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IF WE ARE ALREADY GOING TO DO THE ROAD.
I AM CONFUSED OF OBJECTION, IF THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT HAD
APPROVAL FOR THAT ROAD TO GET DONE, CORRECT?
05:43:59PM >>JONATHAN SCOTT:
THAT'S CORRECT.
MAY BE AN ERROR THAT THEY DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT.
BUT THAT WILL BE UPDATED AND A REQUIREMENT OF THE DEVELOPER.
05:44:07PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
THANK YOU, SIR.
05:44:08PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS.
MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK, 305 SOUTH BOULEVARD, TAMPA,
FLORIDA, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT JOHNATHAN STANTON.
I ALSO HAVE WITH ME THIS EVENING JOHN LAROCCA, URBAN PLANNER
AND RICKY PETERIKA, OUR ARBORIST ON THIS PROJECT.
JUST TO MAKE CRYSTAL CLEAR, MY CLIENT WAS -- IS THE OPENER
OF THE PROPERTY ON REZONING REZ 21-62.
THE ZONING REQUIREMENT INCLUDES A REQUIREMENT TO IMPROVE
THAT ROAD.
THIS WAS LONG BEFORE THE STAFF WROTE THEIR RECOMMENDATION.
I HAVE NO IDEA HOW THEY COULD BE SO FAR BEHIND THE CURVE ON
SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
BUT IT HAS BEEN ON THE BOOKS FOR TWO YEARS NOW.
SO THE ROAD WILL BE IMPROVED.
WE -- AS INDICATED, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO
UNANIMOUSLY, I BELIEVE, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN
AMENDMENT.
THE STAFF HERE TODAY HAS ALSO RECOMMENDING THAT THE REQUEST
IS CONSISTENT.
I WOULD AT THIS POINT TURN IT OVER TO JOHN LAROCCA TO
DISCUSS THE DETAILS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
THANK YOU.
05:45:46PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
I AM JOHN LAROCCA.
CONSULTING GROUP.
URBAN PLANNER.
3225 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE, SUITE 329, TAMPA WE HAVE A BRIEF
POWERPOINT PRESENTATION FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE.
WE WILL TRY TO KEEP THIS COMPARTMENTALIZE AND TALK ABOUT THE
ZONING ISSUE IN THE NEXT HEARING.
WHOEVER IS GETTING THAT STARTED, TURN UP FILE NO. TA/CPA
22-20 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.
THERE WE ARE.
I MAY NEED A LITTLE PRIMER AGAIN ON HOW TO MANIPULATE THIS
DEVICE, BUT I WILL TRY IT AND SEE IF IT WORKS.
WE WILL BE ADDRESSING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ISSUES AND SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION.
AS DAVID INDICATED, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS
APPLICANT CONSISTENT AS DID THE STAFF AND ITS RECOMMENDATION
OVERALL.
ISSUE HERE THAT WAS RAISED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS
THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD.
THE PROPERTY BEING IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
AND THE ROADWAY.
DAVID ADDRESSED THAT AND PART OF MY BRIEF PRESENTATION
REGARDING THE PLAN AMENDMENT.
IF I MAY.
THIS IS AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE PROPERTY ON THE
PALM RIVER LOOKING FROM WEST TO EAST TOWARD THE DOWNTOWN
SKYLINE, THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS TO THE RIGHT ON THIS
IMAGE.
AS WAS INDICATED EARLIER IN THE PRESENTATION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH IS THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY,
AN INDUSTRIAL AREA AND STATE ROAD 60 AND ADAMO DRIVE.
DIRECTLY AT THE END OF THE -- WHAT IS NOW AN UNIMPROVED
WASHINGTON STREET THAT WILL BE IMPROVED PURSUANT TO PREVIOUS
ACTION IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA BASED -- BY THE SAME CLIENT, AN
APPLICANT, IS 50th STREET.
WITH THAT SAID, MOVING ON, THIS PARTICULAR IMAGE REPRESENTS
THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED WITH THE AIR
ROWS POINTING TOWARD IT.
EAST WASHINGTON STREET ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY TO THE NORTH.
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA BETWEEN ADAMO, STATE ROAD 60 AND NORTH
OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY.
THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW IS THE AREA THAT WAS APPROVED.
PLAN AMENDMENT 20-24 IN OCTOBER OF 2021.
A SUBSEQUENT REZONING AND PART OF THAT REZONING WAS THE
REQUIREMENT TO IMPROVE WASHINGTON STREET.
THAT WILL BE PRESENTED LATER THIS EVENING.
WITH THAT SAID, AGAIN, THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE FOUR-STORY
BUILDINGS.
THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR TO THE MEETINGS THAT WILL BE SUBJECT
TO THIS REQUEST WITH THE DENSITY THAT IS BEING PROPOSED
THROUGH THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
05:48:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I WAS GOING TO ADD -- BUT I THINK
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK WILL SAY IT BEST.
HORIZON HURTAK WE ARE NOT ABLE TO LOOK AT THAT RIGHT NOW.
WE ARE STRICTLY LOOKING AT THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT.
WITH THAT SAID, I WILL LEAVE THIS IMAGE HERE AND SAY A
COUPLE OF POINTS I WANT TO MAKE REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR
PRESENTATION REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
REGARDING THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD MEASURE, ELEVATED
APPROXIMATELY 6.5 FEET TO MEET MINIMUM FLOOD ELEVATION AND
BUILDING CODE STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION.
REQUIRE ALL FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FOR LIVING SPACE, SIX
INCHES ABOVE ELEVATION AND ALL LIVING SPACE WILL BE ONE AND
A HALF FEET ABOVE THE CROWN OF THE STREET ADJACENT TO THE
PROPERTY.
AS A RESULT, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS -- THIS DENSITY THAT
MAY BE DEVELOPED WITH APARTMENTS WILL BE ABOVE THE 100-YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION, POST ELEVATION CONDITION.
REGARDING THE NEED FOR ELEVATIONS, ALL MY COMMENTS ARE
RELATED TO THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD ISSUE BECAUSE THAT SEEMED
TO BE THE ISSUE PRESENTED AS CONCERN.
REGARDING NEED OF EVACUATION DURING A STORM EVENT, THE SITE
WILL NOT BE BURDENED BY LIMITED ACCESSIBILITY TO EVACUATION
ROUTES.
WASHINGTON STREET, ADJACENT TO THE SITE, BASED ON THE
DOCUMENTATION, PACED ON A PREVIOUS ACTION AND APPROVAL BY
THIS CITY COUNCIL, WASHINGTON STREET IS PLANNED TO BE
IMPROVED AND WILL BE IMPROVED AT THIS LOCATION.
AND THE FUND WERE BEING UTILIZED BY STATE -- APPROPRIATED BY
THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT THE APPLICANT OBTAINED A SIMILAR LAND
USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTHEAST
AND FOLLOWED BY A SUBSEQUENT REZONING.
THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WILL PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS TO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD AND AT THE SAME TIME, IMPROVING ACCESS OF
RESIDENTS IN NEED OF HURRICANE EVACUATION DURING STORM
EVENTS.
THE SITE'S LOCATION WITH THE IMPROVEMENT TO WASHINGTON
STREET WILL HAVE DIRECT, IMMEDIATE, THREE TO FIVE MINUTES
AND EASY ACCESS TO 50th STREET, THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AND
STATE ROAD 60, ADAMO DRIVE.
AND POTENTIAL FOR HURRICANE SHELTERS ALL INDICATIONS BASED
ON HISTORICAL INFORMATION, ADEQUATE SHELTER CAPACITY FOR
THOSE SEEKING SHELTER PLACE AT LOCATIONS NORTH AND EAST OF
THE AREA.
I WILL NOT GO INTO DETAILS REGARDING ALL OF THE ASSESSMENTS
AND ANALYSIS AND REVIEW AGAINST POLICIES AND PLANS.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION AND
FOUND CONSISTENT AND WE WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
05:51:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY COMMENTS OR ANY QUESTIONS?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:51:27PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
CAN YOU BRING THOSE PICTURES UP AGAIN.
THERE WAS A PHOTO THAT HAD THE FUTURE LAND USE -- ONE OF
THOSE PHOTOS, ANY OF THEM.
05:51:44PM >> YES, MA'AM, GIVE ME A SEC.
05:51:47PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THE GREEN LINE IS COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA,
THAT'S CORRECT?
05:51:54PM >> THAT'S CORRECT, MA'AM, YES.
05:51:55PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
LOOKING TO THE RIGHT, THE LAND THAT IS IN --
ENCLOSED BY THAT GREEN LINE IS NOT IN THE COASTAL HIGH
HAZARD AREA, CORRECT?
05:52:08PM >> CORRECT.
IT IS ELEVATED.
05:52:10PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THAT IS WHAT I THOUGHT.
THANK YOU, THAT IS MY QUESTION.
05:52:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HEY.
05:52:18PM >>DAVID HEY:
JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, IT IS AN ISLAND AND
POLICY IN AT COMP PLAN THAT TALKS OF ISOLATED ISLANDS.
WHEN YOU HAVE AN ISLAND LIKE THAT IT IS DEEMED TO BE IN THE
COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
05:52:32PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WAS TALKING OF THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT.
NOT THE DEVELOPMENT IN FRONT OF US RIGHT NOW.
05:52:38PM >>DAVID HEY:
THE ONE TO THE EAST, IT'S IN AN ISLAND WITH THE
COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AROUND IT.
THE POLICY STATES WHEN YOU HAVE AN ISLAND LIKE THAT, IT IS
DEEMED TO BE IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD.
05:52:49PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
05:52:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU.
MR. MECHANIK, DOES THAT CONCLUDE YOUR PRESENTATION?
05:53:09PM >>DAVID MECHANIK:
I JUST HAVE ONE REMARK TO WRAP UP.
AND THEN I WILL FINISH.
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THERE IS A LOT OF
MISCONCEPTION HERE, BUT COASTAL MANAGEMENT POLICY AND THE
COMP PLAN, 1.2.5, SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES INCREASES IN
DENSITY.
IF THERE ARE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO HURRICANE EVACUATION
TIMES, ROUTES AND SHELTER DEMANDS, MR. LAROCCA'S TESTIMONY
INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO ANY OF THESE
FACILITIES.
AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS
REQUEST.
THANK YOU.
05:53:50PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER 1, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE, MADAM CLERK?
05:54:08PM >> I'M HERE.
CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME?
05:54:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WHO IS SPEAKING?
05:54:12PM >> THIS IS TIM HEALY, FRONTIER ENGINEERING.
ADDRESS 803 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE, TAMPA, 33606.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK -- I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE.
WE ARE WORKING WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA ON THE ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENT.
JUST TO GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW.
WE ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO ADD TWO FEET TO EACH SIDE OF
THAT ROAD TO THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH.
FRONTIER ENGINEERING IS WORKING WITH ADVANTAGE ENGINEERING
AND THEY ARE PROVIDING ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AS
WELL.
AND WE HAVE ARMSTRONG ENGINEERING THAT IS WORKING WITH EPC
WITH ALL ISSUES RELATED TO WETLANDS, SO ON AND SO FORTH.
AT THIS POINT, WE -- WE MOVED FORWARD LIKE YOU GUYS SAID ON
THE PREVIOUS PROJECT TO THE EAST.
WE HAVE STATIONING LAID IN AND I AM WORKING WITH CAL HARDY.
RIGHT NOW CAL IS WAITING FOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH FDOT BECAUSE
THEY WERE THE FUNDERS OF THE PRO CREATIONS TO IMPROVE THIS
ROADWAY.
I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU GUYS NEED TO ASK ON THE
ROAD.
THERE WILL ALSO BE SUFFICIENT WATER LINE AND SEWER LINE RUN
ON THIS ROADWAY FOR US AND TO THE ADJOINING PARCELS.
THE ADJOINING NEIGHBORS.
SO THAT IS ABOUT IT.
05:55:54PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
05:55:58PM >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
05:56:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS.
05:56:02PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
MY NAME IS NATHAN HAGAN.
THIS IS AN INTERESTING PROJECT FOR ME.
THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA DISCUSSION AND CONTINUES TO
HAPPEN IS IMPORTANT IN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
WHAT STRIKES ME ABOUT THIS.
I AM ALSO A MEMBER OF THE SIERRA CLUB CONSERVATION LOCALLY.
I THINK OF THIS ISSUE A LOT.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE PICTURE OF THE PARCEL FROM ABOVE, THAT IS
AN IMPORTANT BARRIER.
AS A NONEXPERT ON THIS.
HOWEVER, WHAT I -- WHAT REALLY STRUCK ME ABOUT THE
PRESENTATION IS THAT THERE IS ALREADY A USE FOR IT, WHICH IS
VERY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL INTENSIVE.
I AM SEEING AN INCREASE OF DENSITY IN UNIT, BUT A DRAMATIC
DECREASE IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE.
I THINK THERE IS A QUESTION THAT THE CITY NEEDS TO BE ASKING
IN THE UPCOMING COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA REPORTS THAT I
THINK ARE BEING WORKED ON WHAT IS RESILIENT HOUSING.
I DON'T THINK SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE RESILIENT HOUSING.
I DON'T KNOW IF A 30-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING IS EITHER.
I WOULD LOVE EXPERTS TO TELL ME THAT.
I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION.
WHATEVER NATURAL BARRIER EXISTS IS ALREADY VULNERABLE IN THE
CURRENT COMP PLAN USE.
I SEE THIS AS AN IMPROVEMENT.
I WOULD RATHER THERE BE HOUSING THAN A BIG WAREHOUSE WITH A
BUNCH OF PARKING LOTS.
NEITHER OUR -- EMPTY PRISTINE PARK, WETLAND AREA.
BUT WE ARE KIND OF PAST THAT ON A LOT OF THESE THINGS.
WHEN I SEE TWO OPTIONS, KEEP IT AS IT IS AND LET THERE BE
HOUSING SO I WOULD SUPPORT THIS, EVEN THOUGH I DON'T LOVE
OBVIOUSLY THAT IT IS BASICALLY A BARRIER IN OUR COASTAL HIGH
HAZARD AREA, BUT I DON'T SEE IT REMAINING THAT WAY
REGARDLESS.
05:57:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS?
MR. MECHANIK, REBUTTAL?
05:57:52PM >> NO, SIR.
05:57:53PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:57:55PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSITION?
MOTION PASSES.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
05:58:05PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
ITEM NUMBER ONE.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE OF THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
PROPERTY 5507 EAST WASHINGTON STREET FROM TRANSITIONAL
USE-24,TU-24 TO RESIDENTIAL-35, R-35, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL
OF ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING SEVERABILITY.
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:58:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
IS A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
05:58:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I ABSOLUTELY CANNOT SUPPORT THIS PUTTING
COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
IF YOU ARE TALKING OF GOING UP LIKE A SUBSTANTIVE AMOUNT
JUST TO PUT A BASE LEVEL.
AND THEN -- I MEAN, GIVE IT TWO MORE YEARS AND THAT FLOOD
ELEVATION WILL BE EVEN HIGHER.
I TEND TO AGREE WHAT MR. HAGAN SAID OF IT BEING A BARRIER
SPACE.
AND I THINK IT OUGHT TO REMAIN.
05:59:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
05:59:15PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
05:59:18PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
05:59:20PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.
05:59:21PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
05:59:24PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
05:59:25PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
05:59:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
05:59:27PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
05:59:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS DOCK.
05:59:43PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION NEXT ITEM IS
NUMBER 12, REZ-23-23.
THE SAME PROPERTY 5507 EAST WASHINGTON STREET.
AND REPRESENTED BY DAVID MECHANIK AND JOHN LAROCCA.
FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY.
06:00:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
BEFORE WE GO FURTHER, IF ANYONE WILL GIVE
TESTIMONY ON ANY OF THE FURTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL CASES ON THE
AGENDA, WOULD YOU PLEASE RISE TO BE SWORN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
06:00:37PM >> I DO.
06:00:38PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
PLEASE BE SEATED.
STAFF, PLEASE PROCEED.
06:00:42PM >>SAM THOMAS:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
SAM THOMAS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE EAST SIDE COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD.
TRANSIT 0.7 MILES SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE AND PALM RIVER PARK
IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITIES LOCATED 0.7 MILES
SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE.
IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AS YOU JUST HEARD AND LEVEL A
EVACUATION ZONE.
REZONINGS THAT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS
WITHIN THE COASTAL MITIGATION AREA WILL IMPACT FURTHER
SHELTER SPACE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
I AM SURE YOU GUYS ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE AERIAL MAP THROUGH
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
SOUTH OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AND EAST WASHINGTON STREET
AND EAST OF SOUTH 56th STREET.
THE PALM RIVER HERE AND SOUTH OF THE PALM RIVER,
UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
AND HERE IS A MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
WITH THE APPROVAL OF FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-20, THE SITE WILL BE
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 LIKE THIS PARCEL TO THE NORTHWEST.
ONCE YOU GO NORTH OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY, YOU HAVE THE
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES.
SMALL AMOUNT OF RMU-100.
AND A LITTLE BIT OF COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 WHICH IS WHERE
THE SHRINER'S BUILDING IS AT.
THE LAND USE SOUTH OF THE PALM RIVER IS INCORPORATED
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND DESIGNATION FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
THE REQUEST FROM 275 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PERMIT 113 DWELLING UNITS.
113 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35
DESIGNATION.
SINCE ITS REQUEST EXCEEDS THE BY RIGHT UNDER THE R-35.
THE APPLICANT PLANS TO ENTER INTO A BONE NEWS AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN PROXIMITY TO THE CORRIDOR
KNOWN AS THE BYPASS CANAL.
SHOULD COORDINATE TO ENSURE THAT NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS ARE
GENERATED ON THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE IDENTIFIED CORRIDOR.
ADDITIONALLY THE CITY'S DRC JANUARY 23, 2023, THE NATURAL
RESOURCE DEPARTMENT RAISED CONCERNS OF THE PROPOSE READY HE
DUNKS OF THE NUMBER OF TREES ON-SITE.
AND URGE THE APPLICANT TO WORK IT WITH THE CITY'S NATURAL
RESOURCE DEPARTMENT DURING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS.
LASTLY, THE APPLICANT MISTAKENLY RECORDED 114 PROPOSED
DWELLING UNITS.
CITY STAFF AND APPLICANT IS SAY WARE AND AGREED TO CORRECT
THE PROPOSED UNITS AND REFERENCE 113 DWELLING UNITS ON THE
PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
IN CONCLUSION, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS FOUND THE
REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND I AM
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:03:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
06:03:34PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, AGAIN, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
IN THIS REQUESTED PD, COUNCIL WILL ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
THE PROPERTY WITH 113 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS 141,736 SQUARE FEET OR 3.25 ACRES.
SUBJECT SITE HAS FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 341 FEET WITH THE
DEPTH MEASURING AT 505 FEET ON THE WEST AND 320 FEET ON THE
EAST.
THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY HAS A WIDTH OF 354 FEET.
AS MENTIONED EARLIER, THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST, WHICH I
WILL SHOW YOU IN A SECOND ON THE AERIAL MAP HAS BEEN
RECENTLY APPROVED THROUGH A REZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY.
TWO PARCELS TO THE EAST.
AT THE END OF WASHINGTON.
BUT WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT ON PAGE 2, I HAVE PROVIDED A
TABLE WHICH GIVES THE DATA PROVIDED WITHIN THE PD SITE
PLAN.
TWO BUILDINGS PROPOSED ON THE SITE.
THIS IS THE SITE PLAN.
AND JUST TO ORIENT YOU, THIS IS WASHINGTON STREET.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND YOU CAN SEE THE SPUR PASS
IT PARKING AND BUILDING IDENTIFIED BUILDING B, BUILDING A
AND THE OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE AND POOL LOCATED ON-SITE.
YOU CAN SEE THAT BOTH BUILDINGS ARE PROPOSED AT FOUR
STORIES.
AND BUILDING A IS PROPOSED 14,184 SQUARE FEET.
BUILDING B PROPOSED 16,431 SQUARE FEET.
TOTAL OF 199 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 173 SPACES ARE
PROVIDED WHICH IS A 13% REDUCTION.
THIS REZONING REQUEST ALSO AS MENTIONED EARLIER HAS AN
ASSOCIATED BONUS AGREEMENT.
THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE INCREASED BONUS OF 25
DWELLING UNITS AND 10% OF DWELLING UNITS AS AFFORDABLE.
THE SITE CONTAINS 3.25 ACRES, MAXIMUM IS 113 AND APPLICANT
PROPOSES 113 UNITS.
AND I HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE.
THIS IS WASHINGTON STREET.
THIS IS 56th AND YOU HAVE 50 THAT IS OFF THE EDGE OF THE
PICTURE TO THE WEST.
AND HERE ARE SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE.
STARTING AT THE CORNER OF 50th STREET AND WORKING OUR WAY
EAST OF THE SITE.
THIS IS A VIEW WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING EAST ON WASHINGTON AT
50th.
THE COMMERCIAL AT THE CORNER ON 50th STREET AS WE HEAD EAST
TO THE SITE AND SHRINERS THAT ARE LOCATED.
ON WASHINGTON.
THIS IS HEADING -- THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE.
SO A LOT OF THE LAND SURROUNDING IS THIS SITE IS VACANT AS
YOU WILL SEE.
THIS IS THE SITE.
HERE IS ANOTHER VIEW.
WE HEAD EAST OF THE SITE.
IF YOU WERE AT A SITE, THE SITE IS ON THE PICTURE OFF TO THE
RIGHT, AND THIS IS THE PART -- THE PROJECT THAT WAS APPROVED
IN '21, THE REZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
THIS IS FOR THE EAST OF THE SITE.
VIEWS EAST.
THAT IS THE SUBJECT SITE FROM THE PREVIOUS REZONING.
AND THEN THERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME THAT
EXISTS.
THIS IS ON WASHINGTON.
THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW.
OF THAT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
AND THIS IS IF YOU ARE ON WASHINGTON.
THE SITE TO THE LEFT IN THIS PICTURE AND THAT IS IF YOU ARE
LOOKING WEST.
THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS IT
CONSISTENT.
SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING I DO HAVE A REVISED
REVISION STREET TO PASS OUT TO YOU COUNCIL.
ONE OF THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED ON THE REVISED REVISION
SHEET IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE APPLICANT TO COMBINE TWO OF
THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE ON-SITE.
THAT IS THE OFFICE BUILDING AND THE POOL BUILDING.
LET ME SHOW YOU.
THIS IS TO MEET FIRE CODE SO THIS IS THE OFFICE BUILDING AND
THIS IS THE CLUBHOUSE SO THEY WILL JUST COMBINE THOSE TWO,
THAT IS IN ADDITION TO THE CHANGES THAT WERE LISTED IN THE
REVISION SHEET AND THE APPLICANT DOES AGREE TO MAKE THAT
CHANGE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
06:08:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:08:48PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I BELIEVE WERE FIVE OR SIX WAIVERS WITH THIS?
06:08:52PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES.
06:08:53PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THOSE WAIVERS?
06:08:57PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES, ABSOLUTELY.
THE FIRST WAIVER REQUESTED TO REDUCE THE PARKING SPACES FROM
199 TO 173, A 13% REDUCTION.
THE SECOND WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE LOADING BERTH FROM ONE TO
ZERO.
THE THIRD WAIVER IS RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OF TREES SO
THERE ARE FOUR NONHAZARDOUS GRAND OAKS ON-SITE.
THIS ALLOWS FOR REMOVAL OF THOSE TREES AND THEN THEY
PROVIDED REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION AS REQUIRED BY CODE.
THE FOURTH WAIVER IS FOR 27-284.
RELATED TO THE GREEN SPACE REQUIRED AND INSTEAD OF 350
SQUARE FEET PER UNIT, THEY WILL PROVIDE 250 SQUARE FEET PER
UNIT.
THEY ARE REQUESTING TO RE DUCE THE BUFFER ON THE EAST.
06:09:57PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
REPEAT THE GREEN SPACE.
150 OR 250.
06:10:02PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
350 REQUIRED.
350 SQUARE FEET AND THEY ARE PROVIDING 250 SQUARE FEET PER
UNIT.
06:10:08PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
06:10:10PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
ABSOLUTELY.
06:10:12PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
225 SQUARE FEET.
AND THEN WAIVER NUMBER FIVE.
FOR 27-284.3.1, THE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED TREE
RETENTION FROM 50% TO 20%.
AND THOSE WERE THE WAIVERS.
06:10:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
THANK YOU.
06:10:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THANK YOU.
PETITIONER.
06:10:56PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS.
MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT
JONATHAN STANTON.
MY ADDRESS 305 SOUTH BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA.
I HAVE WITH ME MR. STANTON.
I ALSO HAVE WITH ME JOHN LAROCCA, URBAN PLANNER AND OUR
ARBORIST RICKY PETERIKA.
BEFORE I INTRODUCE MR. LAROCCA AND MR. PETERIKA, I WANT TO
MENTION TO YOU THAT THE REQUEST FOR THE INCREASE IN DENSITY
ALLOWS FOR MY CLIENT TO PROVIDE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS
FOR THIS PROJECT.
14 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A
BONUS DENSITY AGREEMENT THAT HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED WITH THE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO MAKE NOTE OF THE FACT THAT THE STAFF
HAS STATED THAT THE APPLICATION IS OVERALL CONSISTENT WITH
THE CITY CODE.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT WE AGREE
WITH ALL OF THE CHANGES, WHICH HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE
STAFF.
AND IF COUNCIL IS INCLINED TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION, WE
WILL MAKE THOSE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
AT THIS POINT, I WOULD LIKE MR. LAROCCA TO GIVE YOU AN
OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT.
06:12:26PM >> OKAY, JOHN LAROCCA AGAIN.
3225 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
WE HAVE A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION, REZ 23-23.
IF THIS CAN BE PULLED UP, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.
OKAY.
OBVIOUSLY AS CITY COUNCIL KNOWS, THIS IS A VERY DETAILED
ITERATIVE PROCESS THAT WE GO THROUGH.
WE HAVE SPOKEN EARLIER, AND ACTION TAKEN ON THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, THE REZONING FOLLOWS THAT AND
MUCH OF WHAT IS BEING DONE WITH THE ZONING IS CONSISTENT
WITH THE REQUEST BEING MADE OR AS GRANTED BY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
THIS -- AND I AM NOT GOING TO REPEAT ALL THAT WENT INTO THE
PRESENTATION.
IT IS IN THE RECORD.
WE AS MR. MECHANIK INDICATED, WE AGREE WITH ALL OF THE
RECOMMENDED REVISIONS.
WE WORKED DILIGENTLY WITH THE STAFF.
THE STAFF WORKED HARD WITH US.
AN UNIQUE SITE.
IT HAS UNIQUE DESIGN ISSUES AND CRITERIA.
AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE ARE PROPOSING SOMETHING THAT
IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF THE PLAN AND
THE BROADER AREA HAS.
AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL A
YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
WITH THAT SAID THIS IS A REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 5507 EAST
WASHINGTON STREET.
WHAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU IS THE SAME AERIAL THAT I SHOWED AT
THE PLAN AMENDMENT TO GIVE YOU A LOCATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
LOOKING EAST TOWARD THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, THE LEE
ROY SELMON EXPRESSWAY TO THE RIGHT OF THIS MAP.
BUT DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, SITE PLAN THAT LaCHONE DOCK
PRESENTED IN HER PRESENTATION IS ESSENTIALLY ILLUSTRATING
TWO FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS ON THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN EDGE OF
THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY IS ON THE PALM RIVER.
THE SITE DESIGNERS, SITE ENGINEER, ENVIRONMENTALIST,
ARCHITECT OF ALL TRIED TO MAKE THIS SITE AS COMPATIBLE WHAT
WORKS AT THAT LOCATION WITH THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE AN
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT.
AGAIN THE SAME ILLUSTRATION WE SHOWED EARLIER.
THE AREA IN RED IS THE SITE FOR THIS REQUEST FOR REZONING
FOR THE 113 UNITS THAT OBVIOUSLY WILL BE NOTED AND CORRECTED
IN THE PLAN.
A TYPO OR SOMETHING OVERLOOKED ON OUR PART WHEN WE DESIGNED
THAT PLAN SUBMITTAL.
THE AREA THAT WAS APPROVED IN OCTOBER OF 2021 IS THE AREA
MARKED IN YELLOW FOR A VERY SIMILAR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT BY
THE SAME DEVELOPER APPLICANT.
THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE TWO BUILDINGS AS THEY ARE SITUATED
ON THE SITE.
THIS IS LOOKING FROM SOUTHEAST TO NORTHWEST.
THE PD ZONING IS BASED ON THE CURRENT REVIEW OF THE
APPLICATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MAKING THE
ASSUMPTION IT WILL BE AMENDED TO THE REZ 35.
MAXIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF DENSITY UTILIZING A BONUS AGREEMENT
35 DWELLING UNITS TO THE ACRE AND INCLUDING AN AFFORDABLE
HOUSING COMPONENT AS PART OF THAT BONUS AGREEMENT.
THE POTENTIAL FOR 113 UNITS ARE PART OF THIS PLAN.
IT IS A DENSITY INCREASE FROM 24 UNITS TO 35 THROUGH THIS
AMENDMENT.
AND THERE IS THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT THAT IS
CRITICAL TO THIS REQUEST AND THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT ARE
PRESENTED THIS EVENING.
I REMIND YOU AS WAS TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THE PREVIOUS
ZONING APPROVAL REQUIRED THE IMPROVEMENT TO WASHINGTON
STREET.
ALL THE IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS YOU SAW THIS EVENING SHOWED
THE EXISTING CONDITION.
WHILE THE ROAD HAVEN'T BEEN FINALLY DESIGNED AND DETAILS
HAVE NOT BEEN FINALIZED, THAT ROAD WILL BE IMPROVED BEFORE
THIS IS DEVELOPED.
SO THAT THERE WILL BE ADEQUATE AND PROPER AND IMMEDIATE
ACCESS TO BOTH 50th STREET, THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY, ADAMO AS
IT RELATES TO HURRICANE EVACUATION AND OTHER ISSUES RELATED
TO THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
TALKED ABOUT.
AGAIN, AS WE INDICATED EARLIER, THE SITE IS BEING RAISED TO
ACCOMMODATE MINIMUM FLOOD ELEVATION CODE REQUIREMENTS.
AND IS AN IMAGE OF THE SITE.
THE PROPOSAL LOOKING AT IN THE FUTURE WITH THE TWO COMPLEXES
BEING BUILT AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION WITH THE APPROVALS
SHOULD THE ZONING BE APPROVED.
THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT IS APPROVED 232 UNITS AND THIS ONE
FOR A TOTAL OF 345.
IN SUMMARY, THIS IS ONLY ONE OF FEW VACANT PARCELS IN TAMPA
NEAR THE PRINCIPAL HIGHWAYS AND EASY ACCESS TO THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT.
A MAN-MADE PARCEL WITH NO NATIVE VEGETATION AND COMPRISED OF
A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF FILL.
100%.
DESIGNATED AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS BEING PROPOSED 14 UNITS
THROUGH A BONUS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA.
THE CURRENT MULTIFAMILY UNIT USE WITH A TRANSITIONAL ZONING
24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE TODAY AND THE SITE WILL HAVE TO
BE IMPROVED TO MEET STANDARDS.
I INDICATED TWO FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE THIS AS THE FINAL IMAGE ON THE
RIVER.
THE PLANT ROWING TEAM HAS A MAINTENANCE AND TRAIN FACILITY
TO THE EAST AND PRESENTED EARLIER THIS EVENING, THE OTHER
DEVELOPMENT ON THE WESTERN END OF WASHINGTON THAT IS NOT
ISOLATED AND WON'T BE WHEN WASHINGTON STREET IS DEVELOPED.
I THANK YOU AND I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
DAVID WILL HAVE SOME FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS.
06:18:32PM >> THANKS, JOHN.
DAVID MECHANIK AGAIN FOR THE RECORD.
06:18:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DID YOU WANT TO PRESENTATION YOUR
PRESENTATION.
06:18:41PM >> YES, SIR.
AT THIS POINT, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK OUR ARBORIST RICKY
PETERIKA TO COME FORWARD AND DISCUSS THE NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMENTS AND THE WAIVERS PERTAINING TO THE TREES ON-SITE.
THANK YOU.
06:18:58PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL, RICKY PETERIKA, DARK MOSS.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
THE DARK MOSS TEAM ASSESSED THE APPROXIMATELY 173 TREES ON
THIS SITE.
WE IDENTIFIED NINE GRAND TREES ON OR ADJACENT TO THE
PROPERTY.
FOR -- THREE WERE HAZARDOUS GRAND TREES.
ONE WAS OFFSITE.
WE HAVE -- WE HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO PRESERVE THE
BEST GRAND TREE OR THE TREE WITH THE HIGHEST RETENTION
PRIORITY BASED ON SPECIES AND CONDITION.
AND WE ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE OTHER
FOUR THAT ARE THE WAIVER REQUEST IS DUE TO THE PROPOSED FILL
ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS AND THE STRUCTURE
AND STORMWATER SYSTEM.
IN ONE OF THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION OPTIONS,
PRESERVATION OF THOSE INTERNAL TREES WILL RESULT IN UP TO 50
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES REDUCED.
ANOTHER TWO OTHER TREES THAT NATURAL RESOURCES SPECIFICALLY
REQUESTED COMMENTS ON A TREE TO THE NORTH.
TREE NUMBER -- TREE NUMBER 52.
I APOLOGIZE.
THAT IS A WASHED OUT.
WILL BE ACCESSIBLE OR PRESERVABLE IN SETTING WHERE WE ONLY
DEALT WITH THE HORIZONTAL OFFSETS OF THE TREE PROTECTION
ZONE, 20 FEET.
BUT WHEN DEALING WITH THE CANOPY AND THE -- AND ROUGHLY
SEVEN FEET CURRENTLY ABOVE GRADE, WITH THE SITE GOING UP
SEVEN FEET.
AND THIS BEING NEAR VEHICLE USE AREA WHERE THE SOLID WASTE
TRUCKS WILL BE GOING, THERE WILL BE A CANOPY CONFLICT
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TOO FOR A CHANGE IN THE PARKING LOT
CIRCULATION.
THE ADDITIONAL TREE THAT STAFF REQUESTED -- PARDON ME, ONE
MOMENT -- IS A -- A 46-INCH SOUTHERN LIVE OAK WHICH WOULD
HAVE BEEN A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR PRESERVATION.
NOT SOMETHING THAT I'M SORT OF DISAGREEING WITH, BUT IN
DOING THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION EXERCISE, PRESERVATION
OF THAT TREE RESULTS IN EITHER EIGHT UNITS LOST IN A
BUILDING, A FLOOR ADDED TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE EIGHT UNITS, OR
A LOOSE OF SITE AMENITIES, SPECIFICALLY THE CLUBHOUSE OR THE
POOL.
SO IT IS A DECISION AT THAT POINT.
AND SO THAT WAS THE -- THE JUSTIFICATION OF THE REASONABLE
RECONFIGURATION REQUEST.
THE OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES -- OR TREE-RELATED WAIVER
REQUESTED WAS FOR TREE RETENTION.
WE USE THE RECENTLY ADOPTED WEIGHTED RETENTION THAT
PROTOTYPE OR ADVERTISES TREES THAT ARE OF GREATER QUALITY IN
SIZE AND DISINCENTIVIZE SMALLER LESS, LOWER QUALITY TREES
AND BY PRESERVING THE HIGHEST PRIORITY TREE ON THE SITE, WE
ARE ABLE TO MAINTAIN 2% WEIGHTED RETENTION AND ARE
REQUESTING FOR A SMALL SAFETY FACTOR OF 20% FOR THIS
REQUEST.
THANK YOU.
06:22:19PM >> THANK YOU, DAVID MECHANIK AGAIN.
I WILL JUST WRAP UP HERE.
RICKY SPOKE TO THE WAIVERS PERTAINING TO NATURAL RESOURCES.
I WILL ADDRESS THE OTHERS AND I WILL LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT
ALL OF THESE REGULATIONS THAT WE ARE SEEKING A WAIVER OF ARE
VERY SUBURBAN-TYPE REGULATIONS AND YOU VERY COMMONLY HAVE A
REQUEST TO GRANT WAIVERS BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT TAMPA IS
PREDOMINANTLY AN URBAN INFILL ENVIRONMENT.
AND THESE REGULATIONS ARE A LITTLE BIT NOT RESPONSIVE TO THE
URBAN ENVIRONMENT.
IN PARTICULAR, OUR PARKING REDUCTION IS A REQUEST OF ONLY
13%, WHICH IS NOT A SIGNIFICANT WAIVER.
WE ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER OF LOADING BERTHS.
IT IS VERY SIM CAL TO GRANT THAT WAIVER BECAUSE YOU ARE
DEALING IN MOSTLY LOCAL MOVES WHERE BOX TRUCKS ARE USED AND
YOU DON'T HAVE THE LONG 18-WHEEL VEHICLES.
THE REQUEST FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE WAIVER, THE BUFFER
WAIVER, THAT THE FACT OF THE ONLY USE WE ARE ADJACENT TO IS
THE S.W.F.W.M.D. BOAT HOUSE WHERE THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
USE THE ROWING EQUIPMENT.
AND WE DON'T REALLY FEEL OUR USE IS INCOMPATIBLE WELL THAT
USE AND WE DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL INTERFERE WITH THAT USE.
THE OPEN SPACE WAIVER, AGAIN, IS A VERY SIMILAR WAIVER.
WE ARE PROVIDING 250 FEET PER UNIT.
AND WE THINK THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS THE OBJECTIVE IN
THE CITY CODE.
WITH THAT, WE WILL CONCLUDE OUR PRESENTATION AND BE HAPPY TO
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
06:24:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:24:30PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
START FROM THE TOP.
THE BONUS DENSITY HERE -- YOU ARE GOING TO OFFER 14
AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS.
YOU SAY THEY ARE LOW INCOME.
06:24:42PM >> YES.
06:24:43PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
MY UNDERSTANDING UPON READING THIS, YOU ARE
ASKING FOR 120% AMI, THAT'S CORRECT?
THAT IS NOT LOW INCOME.
06:24:56PM >> THAT IS ALLOWED UNDER THE ORDINANCE.
06:25:00PM >> I DIDN'T USE THE WORD LOW INCOME
I SAID AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
06:25:07PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
LOW INCOME IS IN THE PRESENTATION.
IF WE ARE GOING TO BE TALKING OF REDUCTION AND ALLOWING FOR
HOUSING, YOU SHOULD DEFINITELY LET US KNOW THE PERCENTAGE
OF AMI SO THAT THE PUBLIC KNOWS.
SO THAT IS MY FIRST THING IS I DON'T NECESSARILY CONSIDER
THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
WE NEED WORKFORCE HOUSING, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD SAY
THAT WORKS FOR OUR -- OUR REAL NEED IN THIS COMMUNITY.
I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT PARKING.
GENERALLY WHEN WE APPROVE PARKING WAIVERS, THERE ARE PLACES
FOR PEOPLE TO PARK.
SO WHEN WE APPROVE A PARKING WAIVER, THERE IS MAYBE
ON-STREET PARKING OR PARKING IN OTHER AREAS.
THIS IS NOT IN THE URBAN CORE.
THIS IS PRETTY REMOTE ACTUALLY, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU ARE
LOOKING AT THAT ROAD.
WHERE COULD EXTRA CARS PARK IF THEY NEEDED TO?
06:26:03PM >> I DON'T HAVE ANY ANSWERS TO THAT.
06:26:06PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
BECAUSE IT IS ACTUALLY A SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT
IN MY VIEW BECAUSE WE ARE NOT SURROUNDED BY ANY OTHER TYPE
OF REAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT, I ACTUALLY WASN'T -- I HAD NO
PROBLEM WITH THE WAIVER FOR THE BOX TRUCKS AND WHATEVER
BECAUSE IT IS SUBURBAN IN MY VIEW IN THE WAY IT LOOKS.
I DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE REDUCTION OF TREES.
BUT I DID WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE REDUCTION OF GREEN SPACE.
YOU ARE ON THE RIVER.
YOU ARE IN A COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA.
THE FACT THAT YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO ALLOW ENOUGH GREEN
SPACE TO ABSORB THAT WATER AND TO NOT HAVE ENOUGH TREES TO
TAKE IN THAT WATER IS A HUGE CONCERN.
YOU ARE BUILDING UP SEVEN FEET, BUT YOU ARE NOT LEAVING
ENOUGH PERMEABLE SURFACE TO TAKE IN THE WATER THAT IS NEAR
THE RIVER.
I AM JUST CONCERNED BECAUSE WE APPROVED THIS COMP PLAN
AMENDMENT.
AND YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT BUT
YOU HAVE SO MANY WAIVERS THAT ARE TRULY GOING TO IMPACT THE
COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREAS.
AND I -- I -- I JUST DON'T KNOW HOW -- HOW THIS IS GOING TO
WORK IN THE LONG RUN FOR WHEN WE HAVE.
NOT A QUESTION OF IF, BUT A QUESTION OF WHEN WE HAVE
FLOODING OR RAINS.
IT'S HARD FOR ME IN GOOD CONSCIOUS TO ALLOW FOR LESS GREEN
SPACE ALONG A RIVER THAT WOULD ABSORB THIS WATER.
06:27:40PM >> WELL, WE STILL ARE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL CITY OF TAMPA AND
S.W.F.W.M.D. STORMWATER RESERVATIONS.
THERE IS NO EXEMPTION WHATSOEVER FOR THAT.
SO THERE SHOULD BE NO CONCERNS REGARDING FLOODING AS A
RESULT OF OUR DEVELOPMENT.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO -- IT TOOK ME A LITTLE OFF GUARD ON THE
PARKING QUESTION.
THE REDUCTION IN PARKING IS BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THE
CITY OF TAMPA, DIFFERENT FROM ALMOST ANY OTHER JURISDICTION,
REQUIRES GUEST PARKING FOR MULTIFAMILY.
WE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR REDUCTION FOR THE GUEST PARKING.
NATIONAL STANDARDS -- AND I HAD MANY CLIENTS WHO DEVELOP
APARTMENTS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.
AND THEY DO NOT NEED GUEST PARKING.
THAT IS THE BASIS FOR THAT REQUEST.
06:28:34PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
GENERALLY, I WOULD AGREE.
YOU KNOW ME, I ALMOST ALWAYS APPROVE A PARKING WAIVER.
BUT IN THIS CASE NO PUBLIC TRANSIT.
NO WAY TO USE ANY OTHER TYPE OF TRANSIT TO GET THERE.
NO EXTRA PARKING ON THE STREET --
06:28:49PM >> THERE IS TRANSIT.
06:28:51PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
ON WASHINGTON?
06:28:53PM >> NOT IN WASHINGTON.
BUT I THINK WITHIN FIVE MINUTES OF THE PROPERTY.
VERY CLOSE.
06:28:57PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY.
I AM JUST CONCERNED BECAUSE GENERALLY SPEAKING WHEN WE
APPROVE PARKING WAIVES, THERE ARE PLACES FOR CARS TO GO IF
THEY NEED TO.
IN THIS CASE, I DON'T SEE WHERE CARS COULD GO.
06:29:10PM >> I UNDERSTAND.
06:29:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:29:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I REMEMBER WHEN THE FIRST PROJECT CAME
ABOUT.
I WAS HAPPY THAT THERE WAS SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT THE
TIME, ATTAINABLE.
I DIDN'T REALLY AGREE WITH THE NUMBER, BUT GLAD THAT THE
DEVELOPER SAW A NEED TO PUT THEM THERE.
I WAS HAPPY WITH THAT.
AND, YOU KNOW, I WAS HOPING A LITTLE BIT MORE --
COUNCILWOMAN, YOU ARE RIGHT.
ALLOWING THIS 120 AND IT IS STARTING TO GET OUT OF HAND NO
YOU.
WE ARE TRYING TO CATCH THAT LITTLE GROUP THERE AND A GLITCH
FOR THE PEOPLE THAT REALLY NEED IT, IT IS KIND OF HARD.
I APPRECIATE THE PROJECT AGAIN.
I SUPPORT THE LAST PROJECT THAT WAS ON THAT STREET.
BUT, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, WHAT BOTHERS ME IS, AGAIN, THE BONUS
PROVISION WITH THE 120.
BUT SOMETHING DOWN THE ROAD THAT STAFF HAS GOT TO LOOK AT
THE DEVELOPERS THROWING THIS 10 RULE IN THERE NOW AS -- AS A
CATCH-ALL NOW.
BUT I WILL RESERVE BACK LATER.
BUT OTHER THAN THAT, THE ONLY PROBLEM I HAVE IS JUST THE
NUMBER.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.
06:30:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MISS WELLS, I SEE YOU STANDING THERE.
06:30:35PM >>CATE WELLS:
CATE WELLS, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AMENITY INCLUDED IN THE BONUS
PROVISION IS CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 27-140.
THE CODE CURRENTLY ALLOWS -- CURRENTLY DEFINES AFFORDABLE
HOUSING TO FALL BETWEEN 80% TO 120% OF AMI.
WHILE YOU MAY PERSONALLY FEEL THAT IS NO LONGER APPROPRIATE,
UNTIL WE AMEND THE CODE, THIS IS WHAT I GET TO WORK WITH
WHEN NEGOTIATING THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENTS.
06:31:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I UNDERSTAND, MISS WELLS.
JUST SHOUTING THAT OUT A LITTLE BIT.
06:31:09PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:31:11PM >>BILL CARLSON:
STOP ME IF I AM NOT ALLOWED TO ASK THIS
QUESTION.
BUT SAYING UP TO 120 DOESN'T MEAN THAT EVERYBODY WILL BE AT
120.
IT MEANS IT IS UP TO 120.
DO WE -- RIGHT?
06:31:27PM >>CATE WELLS:
SO TYPICALLY WHAT WE HAVE BEEN -- WHAT THE
CITY HAS BEEN NEGOTIATING IS A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT
THAT WILL TAKE HALF OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AND
PLACE THEM AT THE 80% AMI AND THE OTHER HALF AT 120%.
MR. MECHANIK HAD APPROACHED MY OFFICE ABOUT PLACING ALL OF
THIS AT 120%.
I TALKED TO ABBYE FEELEY.
BECAUSE I FELT THAT DECISION WAS NOT NECESSARILY A LEGAL
DECISION BUT A POLICY DECISION.
THE CODE DOES NOT REAR THAT WE SPLIT UP THE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNITS BETWEEN 80 AND 120.
IT DOES ALLOW ALL OF THE UNITS TO BE PLACED AT ONE
THRESHOLD.
06:32:09PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SORRY, THAT IS GOOD INFORMATION TOO.
BUT MY QUESTION IS, IF SOMEBODY -- IF THE MAXIMUM IS 120.
IF SOMEBODY IS AT 80 AND THEY TRY TO STAY THERE, THEY ARE
ALLOWED TO STAY THERE, RIGHT.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE 120.
06:32:23PM >>CATE WELLS:
I MISUNDERSTOOD YOUR QUESTION.
UP TO 120.
06:32:28PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SOMEBODY AT 80 DO GET IN CONCEIVABLY.
ARE WE ALLOWED TO TALK -- DO WE HAVE ANY DATA, USUALLY
EVERYBODY AT 120 OR SOME DISTRIBUTION.
06:32:41PM >>CATE WELLS:
I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THAT.
I DON'T KNOW IF MR. MECHANIK THROUGH HIS CLIENT WILL BE ABLE
TO SPEAK TO THAT.
06:32:52PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IT IS A MAXIMUM RATHER THAN A MINUTE PUMPKIN
AND WE WILL TALK TO THE POLICY LATER.
06:32:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER 12, REZ-23-23.
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS?
06:33:12PM >> I DO.
06:33:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, SIR, MR. HEALY.
06:33:17PM >> TIM HEALY, FRONTIER ENGINEERING.
I AM THE ENGINEER WITH THE PROJECT.
COUNCILWOMAN BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT REGARDING STORMWATER.
AND I CAN ASSURE YOU THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS A LITTLE BIT
MORE GREEN SPACE WOULD BE MORE OF AN AESTHETIC LOOK.
ALL IN ALL WHEN YOU DO THE CALCULATIONS, YOU ARE GIVEN A
CERTAIN VOLUME THAT YOU HAVE TO TREAT FOR THE AREA THE SITE.
PER S.W.F.W.M.D. AND THE CITY, AND WE WILL ABIDE BY THAT.
SO WE WILL HAVE AN UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM THAT WILL
TAKE IN, SAY A HALF INCH, TO AN INCH, INCH AND A HALF,
WHATEVER IS REQUIRED HERE.
WE WILL TREAT THAT.
AND THEN WE WILL DISCHARGE THAT AFTER TREATMENT.
SO THAT WAS A GOOD QUESTION.
AND WE WILL ACCOMMODATE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF S.W.F.W.M.D. AND
THE CITY.
06:34:12PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
06:34:17PM >> SECOND.
06:34:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I JUST HAVE TO ASK -- I KNOW THIS WAS A
REPRESENTATIVE, BUT MR. MECHANIK, DO YOU WANT ANY REBUTTAL?
06:34:26PM >> NO, SIR.
06:34:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
06:34:34PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MR. CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU.
REZ-23-23.
ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5507
EAST WASHINGTON STREET IN CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FOR RM-16 RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
MULTIFAMILY WITH THE REVISION SHEET.
06:35:00PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
06:35:02PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ORDINANCE.
JUST FOR THE QUESTION.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT MORE ON YOUR
MOTION, COUNCILMAN GUDES?
06:35:19PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
IF YOU WOULD LIKE, SIR.
OR WOULD ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT MORE ON
THAT MOTION?
06:35:33PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
I STATE THE FINDINGS.
THE PROPOSED ZONING WILL ALLOW BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE
LAND CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENSITY ON THE RESIDENTIAL-35
LAND USE 8.14.2.
PROPOSED THE DEVELOPMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES
OR ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN CHARACTER,
LOCATION AND COMPATIBILITY OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
PROMOTES SUFFICIENT SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND
INFRASTRUCTURE.
06:35:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:36:05PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I THINK YOU OUGHT TO TALK ABOUT THE
WAIVERS ABOUT.
06:36:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT, COUNCILMAN
MIRANDA.
06:36:16PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WITH THE WAIVERS, 27-139.4, WAIVERS OF
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND IN NEED OF WAIVERS.
THE REQUEST FOR WAIVERS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR
INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHER PROPERTIES THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED
BY THE WAIVERS.
06:36:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:36:40PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
AS BEFORE, I ABSOLUTELY CANNOT SUPPORT THIS.
WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND
WE ARE JUST IGNORING IT.
AND I AM.
WE HAVE SUCH A NEED FOR HOUSING AND SO MUCH LAND WHERE IT IS
MORE APPROPRIATE.
TO PUT THIS MUCH DENSE HOUSING.
YES, WE ARE CLOSE TO EVACUATION ROUTES.
GUESS WHAT, THOSE WILL BE CROWDED FROM PEOPLE FROM SOUTH
TAMPA TRYING TO GET OUT.
RIGHT HOUSING, RIGHT PLACE.
AND BY JUST AM SO TERRIFIED WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE HAVE A
STORM AND THIS FLOODS.
I AM INCREDIBLY WORRIED, THEREFORE, I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS.
06:37:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
06:37:31PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WANT TO SAY I SHARE THE CONCERN OF
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO WE HAVE TO ADDRESS THIS OUTSIDE OF
THIS HEARING AND DISCUSS IT AT A WORKSHOP OR SOMETHING.
WE NEED TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS, BUT I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE
TO WORK WITH WHAT WE HAVE HERE.
06:37:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANYONE ELSE?
LET'S HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
06:37:56PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
06:37:57PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
06:37:59PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
06:38:00PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NO.
06:38:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
06:38:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
06:38:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
06:38:07PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK VOTING NO.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
06:38:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER -- COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
06:38:23PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I HAVE TO -- I HAVE TO SAY -- RESPOND
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
I AGREE WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THIS.
AND I THINK THIS IS THE PLACE TO TALK ABOUT IT.
WE COULD HAVE SIMPLY NOT APPROVED THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT
THAT WOULD HAVE DEALT WITH IT.
THAT WOULD HAVE SAID, HEY, THERE IS NOT THE PROPER USE.
WE DID APPROVE IT.
THEREFORE, WE ARE ALLOWING IT.
IF WE FOLLOW THE LAND USE -- FUTURE LAND USE WE ALREADY
ASSIGN FOR OURSELVES, THEN WE ARE NOT HAVING THIS PROBLEM SO
MUCH THIS IS OF OUR OWN DESIGN.
I DON'T DISAGREE, WITH WE NEED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION OF IT.
SIMPLY APPROVE IT AND SAY LET'S TALK ABOUT IT LATER TO
SIMPLY UPHOLD THE LAND USE WE ALREADY APPROVED FROM COUNCILS
BEFORE.
I DISAGREE.
I AM SO CONCERNED OF COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BUILDING,
ESPECIALLY RIGHT ALONG A RIVER WHERE WE NEED SEVEN FEET OF
FILL WHY JUST TO GET STARTED.
06:39:29PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, FILE NO. TA/CPA
22-29.
06:39:38PM >>SAM THOMAS:
GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS.
SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
LOCATED AT 111 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE AND 2412 WEST NORTH A
STREET.
INITIATED IN SMALL SCALE IN SIZE 0.4 ACRES AND REQUEST TO GO
FROM THE RESIDENTIAL-20 TO THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 LAND
USE.
HERE IS A SITE ON OUR GENERAL LOCATOR MAP WITHIN THE CENTRAL
PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE ARMORY GARDENS NEIGHBORHOOD.
AN AERIAL OVERVIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN BLUE, YOU
CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA AS WELL.
YOU CAN SEE JUST NORTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF
WEST NORTH A STREET.
KENNEDY BOULEVARD, LIGHT COMMERCIAL USES AND TRANSITION INTO
THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NORTH.
A MIX OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
AND STILL THE REMAINING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.
BUT I WOULD SAY OVERALL THE AREA ALONG DEN DEE WEST OF NORTH
A STREET HAVE TRANSITIONED TO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
HERE IS A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE LOOKING FROM NORTH 8th
STREET NORTH A STREET FACING SOUTH.
A VIEW OF NORTH A STREET FACING EAST.
THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE FROM NORTH TAMPANIA
AVENUE, FACING NORTHEAST.
NORTH A TAMPANIA FACING NORTH KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND THE
OFFICER SECTION OF TAMPANIA AND WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
HERE IS A SUBJECT SITE ON THE ADOPTED LAND USE MAP.
YOU CAN SEE THOSE TWO PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER
THE RESIDENTIAL-20.
ALONG KENNEDY.
URBAN MIXED USE-60.
WEST OF ARMENIA, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS THE R-20 FUTURE
LAND USE DESIGNATION, DIRECT LOW NORTH OF THE R-20.
MOVE EAST TO ARMENIA, TRANSITION FROM THE UMU-60 TO 65.
TO SOUTH OF KENNEDY R-20 AND R-35 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS.
THE SITE RECOGNIZED WITH THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
SO THE IMPACTS OF THIS REQUEST CURRENTLY ON RESIDENTIAL-20
LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR EIGHT DWELLING UNITS OR UNDER
9,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
COMMUNITY MIXED USE, THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 14
DWELLING UNITS OR A LITTLE OVER 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF
RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL USES.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY
POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOUSING THE CITY'S
POPULATION.
THE PLANNING STRATEGY, OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT
MULTIAREA.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS TRANSITION TO A MORE MIXED
USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
INCREASED DENSITY WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT WALKING AND
TRANSIT USES AND COMBAT THE STRATEGY AND PROVIDE HOUSING FOR
TAMPA GROWTH.
AND IT IS INTENT OF THE POLICY SEEKING FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS
WHILE BALANCING THE NEED FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO BE
COMPATIBLE WITH DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER.
IF SITE IS DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL USES BUFFERING AND
SCREENING TO THE POTENTIAL IMPACT FROM THE SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED USES TO THE EAST AND NORTH OF THE SITE.
THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 WILL PROCEED TRANSITION AND
DENSITY BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL-20 -- THE RESIDENTIAL-20 TO
THE NORTH AND URBAN MIXED USE-60 TO THE NORTH OF KENNEDY
BOULEVARD.
CONCLUSION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS THE MAP AMENDMENT
CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
06:43:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
06:44:32PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
TYLER HUDSON, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
TIM JOHNSON AND AVID VENTURES.
TIM IS THE OWNER AND PROPERTY OF THE PROJECT.
I WILL ADMIT AT THE FOREFRONT, IT IS A CHALLENGING PROCESS.
A MAP AMENDMENT AND REZONING.
AS WE DISCUSSED IN THE PRIOR EPISODE, THOSE WILL BE
PRESENTED COMPLETELY SEPARATELY.
I WILL TALK ABOUT THE MAP AMENDMENTS.
IT IS WORTH NOTING THAT THE COUNCIL HAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
A TEXT AMENDMENT.
THE MAP AMENDMENT, TEXT AMOUNT AND REZONING MUST ALL BE
APPROVE PROVED BEFORE ANY SHOVELS GO IN GROUND.
TO SET THE TABLE, A MAP AMENDMENT.
ASK FOR A VOTE AND AT THAT YOU CAN ABOUT THE REZONING.
IN THE INTEREST OF TIME AND PICK UP TIME OUT OF RESPECT FOR
THE REST OF THE FOLKS IN THE AGENDA, I WILL TRY TO AVOID ANY
REDUNDANCY WITH SAM'S VERY CLEAR PRESENTATION.
WE ARE CLEAR WHERE THE SITE IS, NORTHEAST CORNER OF KENNEDY
AND TAMPANIA.
THIS SHOULDN'T BE A HUGE SPOILER.
THE REMAINDER OF THE PROJECT IS THE PIECE ON KENNEDY
BOULEVARD.
THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THIS MAP AMENDMENT.
AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE A PRETTY CLEAR DEVELOPMENT TREND COMING
WESTWARD FROM HOWARD, TOWARD ARMENIA AND HABANA.
WHERE YOU HAVE ABRUPT BETWEEN UMU-60 AND R-20.
IF YOU THINK OF THE LAND USE MAP AND SHADES OF PURPLE AND
BROWN.
R-20 AND UMU-60 ARE FAR APART OF AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGREED THAT CMU-35 IS A
BETTER TRANSITION AND TO BORROW THE STAIR OR LATH LADDER
ANALOGY, ONE STEP DOWN FROM UMU-60 FROM KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
YOU SAW THAT TABLE BEFORE.
I WANT TO OF THE TEXT AMENDMENT FOR CONTEXT SO YOU ARE 100%
CLEAR WHAT YOU ARE APPROVING.
MARCH 9 THIS COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY PERMITTED A TEXT AMENDMENT
THAT WILL ALLOW ON VERY, VERY SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES, LIKE
THIS PROJECT, A PROPERTY OWNER TO USE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
FROM ONE PIECE OF LAND THAT IS COLORED DIFFERENTLY ON THE
MAP TO OVER IN PIECE OF LAND IF THE LAND THAT IT IS GOING
FORWARD IS ON AN ARTERIAL ROAD.
RIGHT NOW YOU CAN DO IT IF YOU ARE A PD, IN THE CENTRAL
TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, IF YOU ARE AN ACRE IN SIZE.
WHAT THIS COUNCIL APPROVED THAT ONE ACRE IN SIZE REQUIREMENT
COULD ALTERNATIVELY BE COMPLIED WITH IF YOU ARE ON AN
ARTERIAL ROAD.
NOT A LOT OF A TELL YACHT ROAD.
THIS SITE HAPPENS TO BE ON KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
I WILL SAY THIS AGAIN IN REBUTTAL, IF IT IS COUNCIL'S
MEASURE TO AMEND THE MAP AMENDMENT AND REZONING, A DELAYED
SECOND READING AND ASK TO ACCOMMODATE FOR ALL THREE OF THESE
COMING TO REST AT THE SAME TIME.
WORTH NOTING AS WELL, COMMON OWNERSHIP HERE ON EITHER SIDE
OF THE ALLEY.
PARCELS ONE, TWO AND THREE ARE BY THE SAME OWNER THE
APPLICANT FOR THE MAP AND TEXT AMOUNT THAT I REFERENCED AND
REZONING THAT YOU HOPEFULLY WILL HEAR THIS EVENING.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TALKS -- DESIGNATES THINGS IN COLORS
AND CAPITALIZED TERMS.
TWO THINGS THAT ARE RELEVANT IS TRANSIT CORRIDORS AND MIXED
USE.
SOME ROADS LIKE KENNEDY BOULEVARD ARE BOTH.
TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
RUN ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THE MIX USED PROVISION AND TRANSIT PROVISIONS OF THE COMP
PLAN, I DARESAY A LITTLE BIT EVIDENT, THIS IS WHERE WE
SHOULD BE DIRECTING GROWTH.
NEIGHBORHOOD AND AREAS OF THE CITY WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS MORE
CHALLENGING, SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL SEES EVERY OTHER
THURSDAY.
SITES LIKE THAT IS NOT IN A COASTAL HIGH HAZARD.
IT HAS TRANSIT SERVICE.
NEAR PUBLIC INVESTMENTS THAT THE CITY COUNTY MADE, VILA
BROTHERS PARK.
ALL THINGS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR INTENSIFICATION.
NOT JUST WHAT WE ARE SAYING BUT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ITSELF.
AS I MENTIONED, THERE ARE TWO PARTS VERY CLOSE BY HERE.
THERE IS A FDOT FUNDING PAVING PROJECT THAT WILL MAKE
SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT TO KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND
IMPROVEMENTS ON KENNEDY.
I THINK THERE ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ANY DEVELOPER OF
THIS PROPERTY TO COMPLEMENT THAT WITH IMPROVEMENT ON
TAMPANIA.
I WOULD LIKE TO GO QUICKLY THROUGH UNPACKING -- I SHOULD
HAVE DONE THE LAST LEAD IS FIRST.
THIS HAD THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
FOR CONSISTENCY AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION IT.
ACCEPTED.
I WOULD LIKE TO UNPACK BRIEFLY THE REASONS WHY.
PROVISIONS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ENCOURAGING THE --
THE INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
UNDERUTILIZED SITES.
WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SAW, WHAT MY CLIENTS SAW,
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION SAW, THIS
IS AN UNDERUTILIZED SITE.
FOR MODERATE DENSIFICATION AND HOUSING AND FOR A MIX OF USES
WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
WOULD ALLOW.
AGAIN, I ALREADY MENTIONED THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR PIECE.
A PIECE OF LAND THAT IS AN ALLEY, A HALF BLOCK OFF OF
KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND COMMON OWNERSHIP WITH THE SITE ON
KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND A GREAT CANDIDATE FOR MIXED USE
REDEVELOPMENT.
THERE IS ALSO REFERENCE TO -- WHERE -- WHERE YOU ARE GOING
TO ADD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS A HARD QUESTION.
YOU ARE CONFRONTED WITH THAT AGAIN ONCE A MONTH, IF NOT
MORE.
SITES THAT HAVE -- SITES THAT ARE PREDISPOSED FOR
INTENSIFICATION ARE THOSE THAT ARE NEAR SOME TRANSIT
INFRASTRUCTURE THAT ARE NEAR JOBS.
THIS SITE MEETS ALL OF THOSE.
BEING IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT.
FINALLY AS HAVE BEEN ALLUDED TO AT THIS MEETING AND ALLUDED
TO OTHERS.
THERE IS A HOUSING SHORTAGE IN TAMPA THAT IS ONE OF THE
REASONS THAT -- THAT CONTRIBUTES TO SOME OF THE HIGH RENT
GROWTH THAT WE HAVE SEEN.
AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS REPEAT WITH PROVISIONS ABOUT
ENCOURAGING THE ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING.
RIGHT NOW IF THIS MAP AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, MORE HOUSING
WILL BE CONSIDERED ON THAT PARCEL, TOGETHER WITH -- AND CAN
BE SHIFTED TO OTHER PARCELS THAT ARE EVENTUALLY REZONED.
REZONED IN CONNECTION.
AGAIN, AS MENTIONED EARLIER, YOUR EXPERT PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF RECOMMENDED THIS FOR APPROVAL AND THE PLANNING
COMMISSION LIKEWISE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED THIS FOR
APPROVAL AND I WILL LIKE TO NOTE THAT WE HAVE TEN LETTERS OF
COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
I THINK MOST OF THOSE CAME IN BEFORE THE BUZZER YESTERDAY AT
5 P.M. WHEN IT SORTS OF LOCKS OUT SIRE.
IN CASE THOSE DIDN'T COME THROUGH, WE HAVE PACKAGES
CONTAINING ALL OF THE LETTERS.
I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
THANK YOU.
06:51:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:51:28PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
EVERYTHING THAT IS SHOWN ON THE THREE
PARCELS GET DEMOLISHED?
OR WE CAN'T DISCUSS THAT BECAUSE A SEPARATE REZONING?
06:51:38PM >> I DON'T THINK THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE, BUT THE -- THE
REZONING THAT HAS BEEN FILED THAT YOU WOULD HEAR SHORTLY
SHOWS A DIFFERENT BUILDING IN A DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION ON
THAT PROPERTY.
06:51:51PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
06:51:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ARE YOU ADMITTING THESE LETTERS OF SUPPORT
AS EVIDENCE?
06:51:56PM >> I WILL ASK THAT THEY BE RECEIVED AND FILED.
YES, SIR.
06:52:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
06:52:06PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
CAN I SEE THE LETTERS?
06:52:13PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
COPIES FOR EVERYONE.
06:52:15PM >> TEN MANILA FOLDERS.
ONE FOR EACH MEMBER OF COUNCIL AND ONE FOR MR. SHELBY AND
WHO ELSE NEEDS ONE.
06:52:26PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
JUST SOME COUNCILMEMBERS WANT TO LOOK.
GO CAN YOU GIVE US TWO MINUTES.
IN THE MEANTIME, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE
PETITIONER?
MISS SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ.
YOU ARE STANDING THERE.
06:52:56PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR, SUSAN
JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
I WANT TO FOLLOW UP ON THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO'S QUESTION.
WITH RESPECT TO THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, COUNCIL IS
EXAMINING AS A POLICY MATTER IF THE EXISTING LAND USE ON
THIS PARCEL IS STILL APPROPRIATE OR FACTORS SUCH AS THOSE
PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT AND BY STAFF INDICATE THAT IT MAY
BE APPROPRIATE TO CHANGE IT TO THE REQUESTED COMP PLAN OR
REQUESTED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THANK YOU.
06:53:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE, THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-29.
PLEASE, SIR.
06:54:01PM >> I HAVE SOME THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO PLACE ON HERE.
06:54:11PM >> THANK YOU.
MY NAME IS ADRIAN LARAMIE.
I LIVE 201 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE AND I LIVE IN THE BLOCK
JUST NORTH OF WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE.
YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NOTING CHANGED
-- OR BEING CHANGED TO ACCOMMODATE THESE -- THIS NEW
BUILDING.
JUST RECENTLY WE DID A COMP CHANGE REQUEST FOR NORTH ARMENIA
WHICH WAS UP HERE.
AND WE -- WE DENIED IT BECAUSE IT WAS GOING INTO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
WELL, IF YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS -- THIS PARTICULAR PHOTO THAT
IT DOES GO IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE SITE, THE SAME AS YOU SEE BEFORE.
THIS IS THE CURRENT -- THE EXISTING ZONING FOR THE AREA.
AND YOU CAN SEE THAT IT IS ACTUALLY IN TO THE RESIDENTIAL
ZONE AND NOT INTO THE KENNEDY OVERLAY.
THERE ARE VERY FEW.
THE ONLY AREA THAT IS IN THE KENNEDY OVERLAY IS ON --
BETWEEN HOWARD AND ARMENIA.
AND THIS IS COMMERCIAL ALMOST ALL THE WAY TO THE INTERSTATE.
AND, AGAIN, YOU HAVE SEEN ONE OF THESE.
THIS IS WHERE THE SITE IS GOING TO BE.
AND THERE IS ACTUALLY NO BUFFER ZONE.
THIS IS ACTUALLY RIGHT ACROSS THE ALLEY IS RESIDENTIAL.
RESIDENTIAL GOES HERE.
AND ALSO ON THIS SITE, THIS IS -- THIS IS RESIDENTIAL-10 AND
20, WHICH IS HERE.
AND HERE IS THE ABOUT WEST TAMPA OVERLAY.
AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE PARTICULAR PROJECT
THAT IS GOING TO BE BUILT.
THIS IS KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND YOU CAN SEE IT IS ONLY
ONE-HALF BLOCK WIDE KENNEDY.
EVERYTHING IS RESIDENTIAL.
IF WE START CHANGING THE CODE FOR THESE PARTICULAR PROJECTS
ON BLOCKS, WE WILL BE GOING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA.
ALL THIS IS RESIDENTIAL HERE.
AND, OF COURSE, THIS IS OVER HERE AS WELL.
THIS IS A PICTURE OF WEST NORTH A STREET LOOKING FORWARD
DOWNTOWN, LOOKING TO IT THE EAST.
YOU CAN ONLY PARK ON WEST NORTH A STREET UP UNTIL ARMENIA,
BECAUSE ARMENIA DOES NOT ALLOW ANY PARKING, NEITHER DOES
KENNEDY AND, YES, THERE IS PARKING ON -- LOOKING WEST ON
NORTH A STREET, BUT WHEN YOU GET TO THE AREA THAT IS THIS IS
THE SOUTH.
PARKING IS ONLY ALLOWED ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET.
THE CITY CODE SAYS IF THE STREET IS ONLY 25 FEET WIDE OR
LESS, THEN YOU CAN ONLY PARK ON ONE SIDE.
YOU CAN'T PARK WHEN THERE ARE DRIVEWAYS.
ALL ON THIS SIDE ARE ALWAYS DRIVEWAYS AND I UNDERSTAND THEY
WILL WANT TO DO SOMETHING TO THE OTHER SIDE.
06:57:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
30 SECONDS MORE.
06:57:38PM >> THIS IS NORTH TAMPANIA AND THE SAME SITUATION THERE.
ONLY PARKING ON ONE SIDE.
THERE WON'T BE ENOUGH PARKING FOR THE PEOPLE THAT THEY PLAN
ON PUTTING ON THIS PROJECT.
THANK YOU.
06:57:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
06:57:51PM >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL.
I MAY NEED A RIDE HOME AFTER THIS.
ANYWAY, MY NAME IS SANDY DIEGO SANCHEZ.
I LIVE IN ARMORY GARDENS.
RECENTLY OUR COMMUNITY CAME BEFORE YOU TO REJECT A PLAN
AMENDMENT THAT DIDN'T MAKE SENSE TO ARMORY GARDEN BECAUSE IT
WOULD CAUSE CHAOS AND BE UNSAFE FOR OUR RESIDENTS.
THE APPLICANT FOR THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT HAD NO INTEREST IN
HELPING THE COMMUNITY AND WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY.
THIS DEVELOPER APPLICANT HAD A MEETING --
06:58:44PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
MISS SANCHEZ, I AM SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU,
FORGIVE ME.
YOU ARE RAISING AN ISSUE THAT IS A CASE THAT COUNCIL HEARD
VERY RECENTLY.
AND IT IS -- THE QUESTION IS --
06:58:58PM >> IT'S DONE.
I APOLOGIZE.
06:59:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
NO.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR.
THAT WAY -- DID YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING MISS
JOHNSON-VELEZ?
06:59:08PM >> OKAY.
THIS DEVELOPER-APPLICANT MET WITH ARMORY GARDENS AND THE
NORTH HYDE PARK COMMUNITY, AND THEY HAD A MEET AND GREET
WITH US TO ANSWER OUR CONCERNS AND TO LISTEN TO THE
COMMUNITY.
SINCE THAT MEETING, THERE HAS BEEN CONSTANT EXCHANGE OF
INFORMATION BETWEEN US.
THIS APPLICANT HAS OFFERED THE PLANS TO ACCOMMODATE OUR
REQUEST.
AND I FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP WE
HAVE DEVELOPED WILL CONTINUE.
IF IT DOESN'T, YOU KNOW YOU WILL HEAR FROM ME.
BUT THE MAIN THING IS, IS THAT THE PARTICULAR TEXT AMENDMENT
BEFORE YOU HAS THE CORRECT LOCATION FOR THE HIGHER DENSITY
THAT IS IN THE KENNEDY BOULEVARD DISTRICT OVERLAY.
IT IS ON HIGH TRAFFIC CORRIDOR AND LENDS ITSELF TO THIS
AMENDMENT.
I MENTIONED BEFORE THAT THE ARMORY GARDENS COMMUNITY WAS NOT
AGAINST RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT AND I FEEL THAT THIS
PARTNERSHIP IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
PARKING AND TRAFFIC WILL BE A KEY ISSUE AND EVERY PROJECT
GOING FORWARD, NOT JUST ARMORY GARDENS.
HOPEFULLY BETWEEN MOBILITY AND THE EVOLVING PARKING
DIVISION, WE WILL BE ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH THESE ISSUES THAT
WILL BE IMPACTING THE ARMORY GARDENS COMMUNITY EVERY DAY.
SO I AM CLEAR, THERE ARE NEIGHBORS CLOSE TO THE PROJECT THAT
STILL ARE CONCERNED FOR THE REDUCTION IN THE PARKING
REQUEST; HOWEVER, I DO FEEL LIKE ARMORY GARDENS HAS GOT TO
GIVE SOME.
WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO EMBRACE SOME OF THE NEW COMP PLANS,
THE THINGS THAT WILL HELP US MOVE FORWARD AS FAR AS HOUSING.
SO I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT I BELIEVE IN THIS PLAN,
AND THIS COMPREHENSIVE TEXT AMENDMENT.
THANK YOU.
07:00:56PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU MIGHT NEED THAT RIDE HOME.
07:00:59PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
MY NAME IS NATHAN HAGAN.
TWO POINTS I WANT TO MAKE.
ONE IS, I WAS AFRAID I WAS GOING TO MISS THIS ITEM BECAUSE
MY PARTNER HAS THE HONOR OF BEING AT TAYLOR SWIFT'S SHOW
TONIGHT.
AND SHE ASKED ME TO DRIVE HER THERE.
WHICH IF YOU KNOW ME IS TOUGH FOR ME TO DO.
I CAN TELL YOU WHAT MANY OF OUR CONSTITUENTS THAT TRAFFIC IN
TAMPA AT 5 P.M. IS REALLY, REALLY BAD.
TOOK ME OVER 25 MINUTES TO GET FROM NOT EVEN AT THE STADIUM
TO DOWNTOWN FOR HERE.
HE PARK HERE.
MY BIKE IS NOT HERE TODAY.
I CAN ACTUALLY GIVE HER A RIDE HOME.
AND SHE DOESN'T HAVE TO RIDE ON MY LITTLE SPOKES OR WHATEVER
KIDS -- AND WHAT IS FUNNY IS, THE STADIUM IS A 15-MINUTE
BIKE RIDE FROM THIS LOCATION.
THIS BUILDING IS A 15-MINUTE BIKE RIDE FROM THIS LOCATION.
THE REASON WHY WE CHOSE TO DRIVE IS BECAUSE OF THE CAR
ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT THAT EXISTS BETWEEN HERE AND THE
STADIUM.
WHICH MANY REGULAR PEOPLE -- AND I AM A VERY STRANGE PERSON.
I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE PERSON.
MANY REGULAR PEOPLE WILL BE UNCOMFORTABLE DOING THAT TRIP ON
THE BIKE.
MY FRIENDS WHO WANT AND LOVE TO RIDE THEIR BIKE THAT ARE
AFRAID TO GIVE THEM SAFER OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE THEM FEEL
COMFORTABLE.
THE SECOND POINT SINCE THIS IS A POLICY DISCUSSION AND
DOESN'T HAVE TO BE SUBSTANTIVE -- YEAH.
WE ARE ALL GETTING USED TO IT, I KNOW, I KNOW.
I PUT AN OFFER ON A HOUSE RECENTLY FOR A TOWNHOUSE.
I LIVE IN A TOWN.
HOUSE DEVELOPMENT.
I SAY NEXT TIME IT GOES UP FOR SALE, I AM GOING TO BUY IT.
ONE WENT UP FOR SALE AND I MADE THE MISTAKE LOOKING AT ONE
OF THE WEB SITES THE DAY IT WENT UP AND I SAID I GOT TO PUT
MY MONEY WHERE MY MOUTH IS AND PUT MY OFFER IN.
I LIVE IN NORTH HYDE PARK RIVER AREA.
THE STARTING PRICE FOR A DOMAIN HOME I DISCOVERED ON THAT
JOURNEY WAS $1 MILLION.
NORTH HYDE PARK, A CERTAIN DEVELOPER -- I DON'T KNOW IF I
CAN NAME THEM, BUT I DID.
THERE IS A HOUSE THAT YOU WOULD THINK WOULD BE AFFORDABLE IN
NORTH HYDE PARK GOING FOR $1 MILLION THAT IS NOT BUILT WHY
YET.
NO ZONING PROCESS THAT CITY COUNCIL VOTES ON.
YOU DON'T SEE WHEN THAT HAPPENS BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE TO
GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS.
THE TOWN HOUSE IS 600,000 FOR THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
WHAT I SEE IT THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE TOWN HOMES IN MY
PARTICULAR PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE IS MORE
AFFORDABLE OPTIONS FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME.
SO, I REITERATE THIS ALL THE TIME R BROUGHT HOME TO ME
RECENTLY WHEN I PUT AN OFFER TO THE HOUSE.
NO WAY I WILL EVER, EVER, EVER BE ABLE TO LIVE IN A
NEIGHBORHOOD AROUND HERE IN A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME, PERIOD.
EVER.
TOWN HOMES -- I DIDN'T WIN THE BID.
I THINK SEVEN CASH OFFERS WHAT MY REALTOR TOLD ME.
WHEN I WENT IN THERE, 20 PEOPLE WALKING THROUGH THE HOUSE
DURING THE OPEN HOUSE WITHIN THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF BEING
LISTED.
IT IS BAD OUT THERE.
I DON'T KNOW HOW I AM GOING TO STAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I AM VERY LUCKY THAT HE CAN.
I WILL STOP THERE BECAUSE YOU GUYS KNOW I CAN GO ON FOR
HOURS.
WE NEED MORE HOUSING.
THANKS TO THE DEVELOPER FOR THIS PROJECT.
I THINK IT WILL PRETTY GOOD.
07:04:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MR. HAGAN -- MR. HAGAN, THE REASON WHY OUR
PROBLEMS -- THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ARE SO BAD AT 5:00, BECAUSE
THIS CITY'S POPULATION DOUBLES EVERY DAY FROM 7 A.M. TO 7
P.M. WE HAVE COMMUTERS COMING INTO WORK FROM PINELLAS,
PASCO, POLK, MANATEE, HERNANDO, SARASOTA COUNTIES THAT COME
THROUGH, USE THE ROADS HERE, AND PAY LITTLE OR NOTHING IN
INFRASTRUCTURE.
BUT THE PEOPLE AFFECTED THE MOST BY THOSE PEOPLE COMING INTO
TAMPA ARE THE RESIDENTS OF TAMPA.
07:05:03PM >> I AGREE WITH THAT.
07:05:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:05:05PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WANT TO ADD THAT I HOPE YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR
BIKE HELMET AGAIN.
07:05:10PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER COMMENTS IN CHAMBERS FOR AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER TWO?
FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-29.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE, MADAM CLERK?
07:05:25PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
07:05:27PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
SECOND.
07:05:27PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO.
SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:05:35PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I WANT TO PREDICATE BEFORE I READ THIS THAT
-- STAIR-STEPPING INTO A COMMUNITY THAT IS RESIDENTIAL FROM
A MAJOR ARTERIAL ROAD, I FIND THIS TO BE THE STAIR STEP THAT
WE NEED.
THAT IS MORE ACCEPTABLE.
ANYWAY.
FILE NO. TA/CPA 22-29
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION.
AND ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED 111 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE AND 2412 NORTH A
STREET FROM RESIDENTIAL-20 R-20 TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
CMU-35.
PROVIDE FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT.
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
PROVIDING A EFFECTIVE DATE.
07:06:37PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
07:06:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:06:40PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:06:44PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:06:45PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:06:47PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:06:48PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:06:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:06:52PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:06:52PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY --
07:06:56PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
EXCUSE KNEE MADAM CLERK, IF I MAY
INTERRUPT YOU ONE SECOND.
ONE THING THAT I NEGLECTED TO MENTION.
BECAUSE THERE IS A COMPANION TEXT AMENDMENT TO THIS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AS WELL AS THE REZONING YOU
WILL BE HEARING NEXT THAT ARE ALL DEPENDENT ON EACH OTHER.
AND BECAUSE THE TEXT AMENDMENT WILL NOT BE HEARD BE COUNCIL
FOR FIRST READING UNTIL THE END OF MAY, WE ARE ASKING FOR
SECOND READING OF THIS ORDINANCE TO BE HELD ON JUNE 15 SO
THAT ALL THREE MATTERS CAN BE HEARD FOR SECOND READING ON
THE SAME DATE.
07:07:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES, MA'AM.
THE DATE.
07:07:35PM >>CLERK:
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ON JUNE 15, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
07:07:42PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
THANK YOU.
07:07:43PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE, FILE NO. REZ-23-15.
07:07:49PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER THREE, FILE NO. REZ-23-15.
THE PROPERTY 2517 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, 2412 NORTH A
STREET AND 111 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
THE APPLICANT IS REPRESENTED BY TYLER HUDSON AND ADDIE
CLARK.
TO REZONE FROM RM-16 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES ON-SITE.
SO I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITH THAT.
AND I WILL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT.
07:08:32PM >>SAM THOMAS:
SAM THOMAS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL PLANNING
DISTRICT IN THE ARMORY GARDENS NEIGHBORHOOD.
PROVIDED ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
VILA RECREATIONAL PARK.
AND WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE A.
AGAIN, HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE.
COMMERCIAL -- LIGHT COMMERCIAL USE ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
YOU TRANSITION INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
USES AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES.
HERE IS A MAP OF THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE.
YOU CAN SEE THE UMU-60, CMU-5 ON THE OTHER SIDE OF ARMENIA
AND SOUTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
THE SITE CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-20 AND THEN WILL
BE UNDER THE CMU-35 FUTURE LAND USE.
APPLICANT REZONE 0.6 ACRES TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY AND
STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL.
WEST KENNEDY IS AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY AND ORIENTED TO THE
FRONT RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH FRONT ENTRANCES ON WEST KENNEDY
BOULEVARD PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND CONNECTING TO A
PROPOSED SIDEWALK.
SUSPECT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
ADJACENT TO USES AND MINIMIZES IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
AREA.
THE PD IS SENSITIVE BY PARKING IN THE NORTHERN FOLIO
WITH A TEN-FOOT BEFORE AND SIX-FOOT MASONRY WALL.
LITTLE OVER 71,000-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING CONSISTENT WITH THE
INTENSITY UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 AND URBAN MIXED
USE 06.
BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMMUNITY MIXED 35 AND THE ABOUT UMU-60 DESIGNATION.
THE SUBJECT SITE TO USE 5.1.6 AS PROPOSED IN 22-30.
THE POLICY ALLOWS LANDS WITH MORE THAN ONE CATEGORY SO HAVE
A FLOOR RATIO THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE AND EACH LAND USE
DESIGNATION CAN BE CONSIDERED ON THE SITE THROUGH A PLANNED
ZONING.
AND MEET POLICY 5.1.6, CURRENT 5.1.6 WILL NOT BE UTILIZED AS
THE PD IS NOT AT LEAST ONE ACRE IN SIZE.
AS MENTIONED EARLIER, SECOND READING FOR THE PLAN AMENDMENT
AND TEXT AMENDMENT IS SET FOR JUNE 15.
AND IN CONCLUSION, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS IT
CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
ANY QUESTIONS?
07:11:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
07:11:32PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YOU SAID CONSISTENT?
07:11:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
DID YOU SAY CONSISTENT?
07:11:38PM >>SAM THOMAS:
YES, SIR.
07:11:40PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:11:41PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, AGAIN, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, THIS REZONING CONTAINS THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH HAS
A TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 28,306 QUARTER -- SQUARE FEET.
THE SITE MAN SUBMITTED.
NORTH A STREET.
THIS IS TAMPANIA.
THIS IS KENNEDY.
THE SITE IS THAT OUTLINED HERE.
07:12:10PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
CAN YOU ZOOM OUT A LITTLE?
07:12:12PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES.
LET ME SEE.
THERE YOU GO.
A BETTER VIEW.
THIS SITE IS ROUNDED WITH WEST NORTH A STREET TO THE NORTH,
WHICH IS HERE.
AND THEN KENNEDY BOULEVARD IS TO THE SOUTH AND TAMPANIA IS
TO THE WEST.
AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS ORIENTED YOU WITH THE
LOCATION OF THIS SITE.
THE PD SITE PLAN SUBMITTED, PROPOSES A SEVEN-STORY
STRUCTURE.
IT WILL CONTAIN 71,013 SQUARE FEET AND COMPRISE OF 40
MULTIFAMILY UNIT OF, 40,000 SQUARE FEET OF STOREFRONT
COMMERCIAL OFFICE SPACE AND 307 SQUARE FEET OF SURFACE
SPACE.
SURFACE LEVEL PARKING IS PROPOSED.
TWO PARCELS IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN.
A PARCEL A, WHICH IS THE SOUTHERN PARCEL.
THAT'S THIS ONE ON KENNEDY AND A PARCEL B, WHICH IS WHERE
THE PARKING IS LOCATED ON-SITE.
PARKING TABLE HAS BEEN -- USE TABLE HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITHIN
THE STAFF REPORT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE SURROUNDING USES.
TOE OF 887 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 55 SPACES ARE
PROVIDED.
ALSO ON THIS ONE, THE DEVELOPER HAVE ENTERED INTO A BONUS
AGREEMENT WHICH WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, AND THE DEVELOP WILL
PROVIDE 10% AFFORDABLE UNITS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT.
SO ON THE SITE PLAN ITSELF, YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE ALLEY.
SO ACCESS IS PROPOSED TO THE SITE FROM THE ALLEY WITH THE
PARKING THAT IS LOCATED -- SURFACE PARKING HERE TO THE
NORTH.
YOU CAN SEE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROVIDED ON-SITE AND THE
STRUCTURE ITSELF LOCATED HERE ON PARCEL A WITH SOME SURFACE
PARKING AND ADDITIONAL PARKING PROPOSED ON-SITE.
THIS IS THE ZONING MAP, THE AERIAL.
THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED.
THIS IS TAMPANIA.
THIS IS KENNEDY.
AND THIS IS WEST NORTH A STREET.
YOU CAN SEE ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL
ZONING THAT EXISTS.
YOU HAVE YOUR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY.
YOUR RM-16 WHICH SURROUNDS THE SITE TO THE NORTH AND
NORTHWEST.
YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF PDs LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY ALONG
WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY THAT EXISTS FURTHER NORTH
AND NORTHEAST OF THE SITE.
AND I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
THIS IS THE WEST END OF THE SITE.
THIS IS ON TAMPANIA, LOOKING NORTH.
THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
THE WEST END LOOKING AT THE SITE.
WEST OF THE SITE ON TAM PAIN THAT WHICH IS THERE.
THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE, THE COMMERCIAL THAT EXISTS ON
KENNEDY AT TAMPANIA.
THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
ANOTHER VIEW TO THE SOUTH.
THIS IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE.
IF YOU ARE ON KENNEDY LOOKING NORTH.
WEST ON KENNEDY.
THIS IS THE ALLEY.
THE PARCEL A.
PARCEL B ON KENNEDY WILL BE LOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF THE
PICTURE.
ANOTHER VIEW OF THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, IF YOU WERE
LOOKING NORTH TO THE RESIDENTIAL THAT EXISTS TO THE NORTH.
AND THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE.
WILL CIRCLE BACK.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY WHICH EXISTS.
THAT IS ON NORTH A.
NORTH A, AND CIRCLE BACK EAST.
AND THIS IS DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SITE, THE COMMERCIAL.
AND THEN THIS IS KENNEDY.
THE STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THE REQUEST.
FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT.
DUE TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION FROM NATURAL
RESOURCES.
ALSO, THERE ARE SOME CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE.
THERE IS A REVISION SHEET TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF
REPORT, BUT ALSO SOME CORRECTIONS TO THE WAIVER I WOULD LIKE
TO STATE ON THE RECORD.
SO THE WAIVERS REQUESTED WITH THIS PD APPLICATION, THERE ARE
A TOTAL OF FOUR WAIVERS.
THE FIRST WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF OVERALL
SPACES THAT SHOULD BE FROM 87 TO 55.
ON PAGE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT THAT WILL BE CORRECTED.
IT IS A 37% REDUCTION VERSUS A 43% REDUCTION.
43 IS INCORRECT.
AND THEN WAIVER NUMBER TWO IS REQUESTED.
IT IS A WAIVER TO NATURAL RESOURCES RELATING TO TH
USE-TO-USE BUFFER ON THE EAST OF THE TYPE C USE.
AND PARCEL IF B IS REDUCING THAT BUFFER FROM A TYPE A USE.
THE THIRD WAIVER IS A NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVER AND TO REDUCE
THE EIGHT-FOOT REQUIRED VUA BUFFER.
THAT SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO 5.5 FEET.
AND THIS IS ALONG TAMPANIA AVENUE AND THIS IS FOR PARCEL B
ONLY.
AND THEN THE FOURTH WAIVER IS THE 27-284.3.3-D, ANOTHER
NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVER AND RELATED TO THE PARKING ISLANDS
TO REDUCE IT FROM THE REQUIRED 13-FOOT WIDTH TO SIX FEET.
AND THOSE ARE THE CORRECTIONS ON THE WAVERS.
THE REVISIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANT AND THEN
OF COURSE THE REVISIONS REQUIRED FOR FIRST AND SECOND
READING.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
07:18:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
07:18:19PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
07:18:26PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
TYLER HUDSON, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
I AM GOING TO GO INTRODUCE THE PROJECT TEAM WORK ON THIS
PROJECT FOR SOME TIME.
WITH ME TO SPEAK IN A LITTLE BIT TIM JOHNSON WITH AVID
VENTURES.
ADDIE CLARK AND.
OUR ARBORIST RICKY PETERIKA.
OUR ARCHITECT OWA AND HIS PRINCIPAL IS HERE AND OUR CIVIL
ENGINEER IS KIMLEY-HORN AND BEN PLANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE FROM THE EXPERT TEAM.
AVID VENTURES.
THE COUNCIL APPROVED THAT YOU THANK YOU FOR.
PARCEL B ON SCREEN.
BUT PARCEL A AND B WILL ALL BE REZONED TOGETHER.
AGAIN JUST TO REITERATE WHERE THIS IS.
AS I MENTIONED IN MY LAST PRESENTATION.
THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR.
NOT A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
THE FRONT IN THE KENNEDY OVERLAY.
AND THE BACK OF THE SITE IS NOT.
NOT AS RELEVANT.
REALLY NOT VERY FAR AT ALL BIKE RIDE, SCOOTER RIDE FROM
AMENITIES A GROCERY STORE, RESTAURANT AND THE UNIVERSITY OF
TAMPA THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT LACHONE DID A GOOD JOB.
RIGHT NOW DEFICIENT SIDEWALKS.
BROKEN.
FROM WHAT WE HAVE HEARD FROM WITH THE NEIGHBORS, A LOT OF
ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY ON THIS.
FOLKS HAVE A TENDENCY TO PARK PERPENDICULAR ON TAMPANIA.
WE ARE GOING TO CHANGE THAT IN A WAY -- THIS SITE IN GENERAL
IS NEED OF A LITTLE CLEANUP.
IT WAS A VETERINARY CLINIC THAT SERVED THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR
MANY, MANY DECADES AND THEY SERVE THE FACILITY FROM A COUPLE
OF BLOCKS AWAY.
AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE PHOTO, WE THINK THE SITE CAN USE A
LITTLE TLC LACHONE WALKED YOU THROUGH THE SITE.
THIS IS A TRUE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
A HOME FOR AT LEAST 40 PEOPLE.
IT IS GOING TO BE AN OFFICE HOME FOR 3700 SQUARE FEET WORTH
OF PEOPLE.
REALLY THE ENTIRE SECOND FLOOR OF THIS PROJECT.
THE GROUND FLOOR FOR 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF STOREFRONT
RESIDENTIAL SPACE, BUT CATCH-UP FOR RESIDENTIAL.
WE ARE NOT PRECISELY SURE WHAT IT WILL BE.
OUR TRAFFIC STUDY SOME SORT OF VARIETY STORE.
BUT THE EXACT TIME OF MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LIKES FOR CATEGORY SUCH AS UMU-60 ON
KENNEDY BOULEVARD.
A SEVEN-STORY BUILDING.
IN TERMS OF HOW THE SITE GENERALLY WORKS, NORTH IS UP.
PEDESTRIAN POINTS OF ENTRY OF THE BUILDING ARE ALONG
TAMPANIA, IF AS WELL AS ALONG KENNEDY.
NOT INTRODUCING NEW CURB CUTS ALONG TAMPANIA.
FDOT WOULD NOT IN A MILLION YEARS GIVE US ONE.
A CONCERN WITH THE PRIOR ITERATION OF THE PROJECT.
CURB CUT ON TAMPANIA.
ALL THE ACCESS TO THE SITE IS THROUGH THE ALLEY.
SOMETIMES YOU CAN ACCOMMODATE THAT THROUGH DEVELOPMENTS.
SOMETIMES YOU CAN'T.
BUT CREDIT FOR THE ENTIRE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT TEAM TO FIND A
WAY TO ACTUALLY MAKE THAT WORK.
OTHER PIECE THAT I SORT OF PREVIEWED WE ARE PROVIDING SIX
NEW ON STREET PARKING SPACES.
AS COUNCIL WELL KNOWS, WE ARE NOT COUNTING THAT FOR OUR
PROVIDED PARKING.
WE CAN'T, BUT WE DO THINK THAT IS A GOOD USE OF THE SPACE
HERE.
RIGHT ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
AND WE ARE PROPOSING A NEW SIX-FOOT SIDEWALK FOR THE ENTIRE
WESTERN EXTENT OF THE PROBABLY BOUNDARY.
HERE IS A RENDERING FOR WHAT THEY THINK THE SITE CAN LOOK
LIKE.
BECAUSE AFFORDABLE HOUSING -- I WILL PUT THAT IN QUOTES --
CAME UP IN THE PRIOR PROJECT, I WANT TO UNPACK THAT A LITTLE
BIT HERE.
WE HAVE 40 UNITS IN COMPLIANCE WITH 27-40 OF THE COULD HE
HAD.
A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT THAT WILL BE APPROVED AT THE
SECOND READING ON JUNE 15, IF COUNCIL APPROVES THIS PROJECT.
2% AT 0% AMI.
2& AT 120 AMI.
DEFINES WHAT AFFORDABLE MEANS.
AFFORDABLE IS A CATCH-ALL TERM FOR THREE INCOME CATEGORIES.
VERY LOW INCOME 50% AMI.
LOW INCOME 80% AMI AND MODERATE.
120% AMI.
THAT IS THE WAY THE TERM AFFORDABLE GETS THROWN AROUND.
NOT TO SAY NOT A POLICY DISCUSSION TO ANNOUNCE.
WE ARE NOT MAKING THESE TERMS UP.
THE TERMS 27-140 OF THE CODE THAT STATES THAT IN ORDER TO
QUALIFY FOR THE BONUS DENSITY THAT THIS SITE PRESUMES USING,
BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT, 10% BETWEEN 80 AND 120.
AND THE CONVENTION ON A LOT OF THESE PROJECTS ARE HALF AND
HALF.
TWO OF OUR UNITS LIMITED TO PEOPLE WITH AN INCOME AT 80%
OF AMI.
TWO WITH FOLKS AT 120% OF AMI.
IN TERMS OF SUPPORT, AS SAM MENTIONED, THE PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF BELIEVES THIS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS RECENTLY AMENDED PRELIMINARILY BY
THIS COUNCIL.
SEVERAL VERY VIEWING DEPARTMENTS FOUND THIS CONSISTENT AS
WELL.
ON THE WAIVER FRONT, WE DO REQUIRE FOUR WAIVERS THAT
CANDIDLY IS ON THE LOW SIDE FOR AN URBAN INFILL.
I HALF JOKED THAT URBAN INFILL PROBLEMS HAVE A STANDARD
SEVEN PACK OF WAIVERS.
THE SAME ONES EVERY TIME.
THIS PROJECT DOES ONLY PRESENT FOUR IN PRESIDENT RECORD.
I AM NOT GOING TO REHASH EVERY ITEM, BUT WE HAVE IN THE
RECORD A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL WAIVER JUSTIFICATION, MEMORANDUM
THAT APPLIES THE CRITERIA FOR EACH OF THE FOUR WAIVERS.
FOR NOW, ASK ADDIE CLARK TO WALK THROUGH THE WAIVERS AND THE
JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH.
07:24:36PM >> GOOD EVENING, ADDIE CLARK, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE.
START WITH PARKING.
THE SITE PROPOSED TO PROVIDE 55 PARKING SPACES, TWO
MOTORCYCLE SPACES AND BICYCLE PARKING.
THE PROJECT IS PROVIDING ONE SPACE PER BEDROOM WHICH WE
BELIEVE IS ENTERALLY APPROPRIATE.
GREATER PARKING RATIO PER BEDROOM THAN A LOT OF THE PROJECTS
WE SEE IN THE CITY.
AS TYLER MENTIONED SINGS ON-STREET PARKING SPACE ALONG
TAMPANIA WHICH IS A DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENT AS YOU SAW WHAT
CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THAT CURB INFRASTRUCTURE.
THE 55 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE SITE WILL BE MORE THAN
SUFFICIENT FOR THIS SITE SINCE THE RESIDENTIAL USES WILL HAD
BEEN ABLE TO COINCIDE WITH THE COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE PARKING
IN THE EVENING FOR THAT KIND OF COMPATIBLE TRADE-OFF OF
TIMING WHEN THE PARKING IS NEEDED.
THIS IS ONLY FURTHER PROVEN BY NATIONAL INDUSTRY STANDARD
DATA BY ITE IN THEIR PUBLICATION PARKING WHICH IS A FIFTH
EDITION A COLLECTION OF VETTED AND MORE RECENT PARKING DATA
COMPARED TO WHAT THE CITY CODE IS BASED ON.
ONE SPACE PER BEDROOM IS WHAT WE ARE PROVIDING.
AND HERE -- EXCUSE ME.
USING ITE PUBLISHED PARKING RATES.
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY NEED 48 SPACES WITH THE 55 PER
PROVIDING MORE THAN WHAT ITE REQUIRES.
ON TOP OF THAT YOU CAN SEE IN YELLOW-ORANGE THE SIX
ON-STREET PARKING SPACES WE ARE NOT COUNTING IN OUR
CULMINATIVE TOTAL.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS RELY ON A
NUMBER OF SOURCES LIKE ITE SINCE CITY CODES ARE NOT
REFLECTED AS OFTEN TO REFLECT CURRENT TRENDS.
THE CITY CODE DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT THE PARK DEGREE
MAN AND FOR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THIS.
BUT EXCLUSIVE 1 UNION WILL% FOR EACH USE 24 HOURS A DAY,
SEVEN DAY AS WEEK.
THIS IS NOT THE CASE AS ANYONE WHO IS FAMILIAR WITH
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICE DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THIS
DEVELOPER THEY KNOW THERE IS A EBB AND FLOW OF PARKING
DEMAND THROUGH HOURS OF THE DAY AND WE LOOK AT THE TIME OF
DAY DISTRIBUTION THAT WE WILL GET TO IN A MOMENT TO MORE
PROPERLY DEVELOP THESE PROJECTS.
THE BEST EXAMPLE OF HOW DISTRIBUTION OF PARKING DEMAND EBBS
AND FLOWS DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE DAY.
THIS IS SHOWING THAT END GLOW GRAPHICALLY.
THE PERCENT OF PEAK PARKING DEMAND THROUGHOUT A 24-HOUR
PERIOD BASED ON EXTENSIVE DAY THAT THAT ITE HAS FOR SIMILAR
SITES.
A REPRESENTATIO, A HEAT MAP OF THE 1000 WILL THESE
PARKING DEMAND IN RED AND HOW THE PARKING DEMAND AND
FLOWS AND PEAKS AND VALLEYS TO THE PARKING
OF A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THIS IS THE EXACT SAME DATA THAT YOU JUST SAW
REPRESENTED IN A DIFFERENT MANNER.
YOU CAN SEE THESE PEAKS AND VALLEYS HERE AS YOU GO INTO THE
LATER HOURS OF THE DATE WHERE THAT RESIDENTIAL DEMAND DOES
INCREASE BECAUSE YOU HAVE OVERNIGHT PARKING.
THAT IS WHEN COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE IS EMPTY.
HERE YOU CAN SEE THAT ON-STREET PARKING SITUATION THAT TYLER
WENT INTO AND THE SPACES WE ARE PROPOSING.
WE ALSO MENTIONED HOW THIS IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS AND MIXED
USE CORRIDOR.
YOU CAN SEE FROM WALKSCORE.COM, THIS AREA IS NESTED WITHIN
AN AREA OF AMPLE RESTAURANT AND GROCERY AND OTHER THINGS OF
THE LIKE.
WITH THE NEW SIDEWALK THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSING AND
THE IMPROVEMENTS FROM THAT FDOT IS PROPOSING.
THIS AREA IS DEEMED AS A WALKER'S PARADISE.
THE INTENSIFICATION ON THIS ARTERIAL ALREADY IDENTIFIED AS A
TRANSIT CORRIDOR CAN ONLY IF ATTRIBUTES THE WALKER'S
PARADISE.
THE NEXT WAIVER IS WITH LANDSCAPE BUFFERING AND A SMALL SITE
AND INHERENTLY IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH EVERY ASPECT OF THE
CODE WHEN DEVELOPING A THOUGHTFUL AND FUNCTIONAL SITE ON A
SMALLER PIECE OF PROPERTY.
WE THINK THIS EXHIBIT IS VERY HELPFUL AS IT SHOWS THE
EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERING WE ARE PROVIDE
SOMETHING SUBSTANTIAL FOR THIS INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
AND GOING INTO THESE PARCEL A IS THE PARCEL ALONG KENNEDY.
ADJACENT TO THE TGH PARKING LOT AND CODE REQUIRES A 15-FOOT
USE BUFFER AND WE FEEL THAT A SIDEWALK AT THIS LOCATION IS
MORE APPROPRIATE AS IT WILL CONNECT THE USERS OF THIS SITE
TO KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND HAVE THAT ADJACENT SIDEWALK THERE.
WE BELIEVE HAVING THAT OPPOSED TO A WALL TO A MEDICAL USE
PARKING LOT IS A BETTER USE.
AND THE PARCEL B TO THE NORTH.
ASKING FOR A FIVE-FOOT REDUCTION FOR THAT USE-TO-USE BUFFER
TO THE EAST AND BETTER PARKING.
AND A TRADE-OFF THERE.
REDUCTION INTENDED TO BE REPLACED BY AN EN CHANCED
LANDSCAPED BUFFER AND RICKY PETERIKA WITH DARK MOSS IS HERE
TO SPEAK MORE INTELLIGENTLY ABOUT THAT.
THE PARKING ISLAND, THE 13-FOOT REQUIRED WIDTH WAS
CONTEMPLATED WHEN LOOKING AT LARGER PARCELS WITH ROWS AND
ROWS OF PARKING.
THE STALLS -- SORRY THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROPOSED HERE ARE
SUFFICIENT AND WE BELIEVE THERE IS SUFFICIENT CIRCULATION ON
THE SITE WITH THAT.
LASTLY, FOR PARCEL B, A SLIGHT REDUCTION IN THE DISTANCE
FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE NEAREST PARKING SPACE, 5.5
FEET.
THE VU BUFFER.
FOR THE NEAREST TRAVEL LANE OF NORTH TAMPANIA.
YOU CAN SEE HERE, WE ACTUALLY HAVE THREE FEET OF LANDSCAPE
JUST OUTSIDE OF PARCEL BOUNDARY AND ADDITIONAL SIX FEET OF
THE SIDEWALK THAT THE DEVELOPER IS PROPOSING PLUS AN
EIGHT-FOOT-WIDE ON-STREET PARKING SPACE.
22 FEET OF -- OF BUFFER FROM THE STREET FROM THE VEHICLE USE
AREA.
SO I BELIEVE THAT IS SUFFICIENT FOR THERE ARE LOCATION.
I DO WANT TO MENTION THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY MEETING AND
EXCEEDING OUR GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT.
SO NOW I WILL PASS IT ON TO OUR CLIENT, TIM JOHNSON
WITH AVID VENTURES TO TALK MORE ABOUT HIS PROJECT AND
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
07:31:23PM >> HELLO, TIM JOHNSON.
SWORN IN.
APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE TONIGHT.
I THINK THE PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WE PUT FORWARD TODAY IS
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GREAT THINGS GOING OBJECT IN THE CITY
TODAY.
I HAVE BEEN FORTUNATE TO BE PART OF A LOT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT
IN THE CITY, A LOT OF IT ON WATER STREET.
AND THEN I ALSO KIND OF STEPPED BACK AND LOOKED AT WHAT IS
GROWING IN THE CITY.
AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE THIS MIDDLE
HOUSING.
CAN'T JUST BE TOWN HOMES AND TOWERS.
I THINK THERE ARE A LOT OF GREAT SITES ALONG THESE CORRIDORS
AND OTHER AREAS THAT NEED HOUSING.
WE ARE TRYING TO DO SMART DEVELOPMENT.
WE ARE REALLY FOCUSED ON BRINGING HOUSING -- MIXED USE
PROJECTS IN COMMUNITIES THAT MAKE SENSE.
AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS.
A SERIOUS HOUSING CRISIS GOING ON.
I CAN'T SOLVE IT ALONE BUT EVERY BIT HELPS.
ANOTHER PROJECT EARLIER THIS YEAR.
I THINK THE SMALLEST ONE IN TAMPA TO COMMIT TO AFFORDABLE
HOUSING REQUIREMENT.
AND I LOOK FORWARD TO DOING MORE.
SORRY, ONE OTHER THING, WE DID ACTIVELY TALKED TO THE
NEIGHBORHOODS.
WE MADE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCTION.
I LIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY.
I WANT TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR.
I WANT TO BE A GOOD CITIZEN HERE.
WE REDUCED THE COUNT.
INITIALLY PLANNED 54 UNITS.
TOOK DOWN A WHOLE FLOOR.
BROUGHT IT TO 40 AND INCREASING THE PARKING AND ADDED
ON-STREET PARKING AND REMOVED A DRIVEWAY ON TAMPANIA TO TAKE
ADVANTAGE OF THE ALLEY HERE.
WE TRIED TO LISTEN.
I THINK SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT SPOKE EARLIER AND HOPEFULLY
SPEAK AFTER THIS WILL SHOW THAT AND FOCUS ON TRYING TO BE
THE BEST NEIGHBOR POSSIBLE.
DEFINITELY NOT PERFECT, BUT DOING WHAT WE CAN.
THANK YOU.
07:33:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:33:14PM >> THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
07:33:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:33:23PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
EXPLAIN TO ME HOW WE ENDED UP WITH SURFACE
PARKING.
INSTEAD OF COMBINING SOME SOMEHOW.
I AM JUST -- EITHER PARKING GARAGE FOR RESIDENCES ABOVE IT
INSTEAD OF LOWERING THE UNIT COUNT.
WHY?
07:33:48PM >> SO FIRST VERSION OF THE PLAN CONTEMPLATED -- THE EXISTING
SITE IS THE VET CLINIC UP FRONT AND THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
THAT EXISTS TODAY.
SO OUR FIRST VERSION OF THE PLAN -- THIS IS VERSION 3.
HAD A BUILDING UP FRONT ON KENNEDY PROPOSED SIMILAR TO
TODAY.
SAME FOOTPRINT, ON THE BACK COULD FIT SIX OR SEVEN TOWN
HOMES.
AFTER SEEING SOME COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD AND WHAT IS GOING ON
WITH THE ADDITION OF THE DRIVEWAYS THAT WOULD NEED TO GO ON
THE STREET.
I PERSONALLY DIDN'T THINK IT WAS THE RIGHT CALL.
WE WERE HONESTLY TWO WEEKS FROM SUBMITTING THE ONE PLAN.
I PULLED AN AUDIBLE AND TOLD THE TEAM TO START OVER.
CAN WE LOOK AT PULLING THE SAME AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE AND
PUT IT ON TOP OF THE UNITS AT KENNEDY KEEPING THE SURFACE
LOT THERE TODAY.
THAT HAS BEEN
THE USE FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
THE NEIGHBORHOOD DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.
IT HAS BEEN EXISTING.
IT HAS BEEN THERE.
AND COMMITTED TO HAVING, EXCUSE ME -- AN ENHANCED
LANDSCAPE BUF FER TO NORTH A TO BUFFER WITH OTHER
RESIDENCES.
TO SHIFT TO KENNEDY AND KEEP IT AS LOW IMPACT AS POSSIBLE ON
THE BACK PARCEL.
07:35:04PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
JUST VERY UNUSUAL BECAUSE WE HAVE SEEN A LOT
OF PARCELS LIKE THIS STAIR-STEP DOWN.
THEY WILL DO THE HIGH RISE TOWNHOUSE AND THEN INTO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS IS JUST UNUSUAL TO SEE SURFACE PARKING.
07:35:20PM >> I CAN'T -- I CAN'T SAY THAT YOU ARE NOT CORRECT ON THAT.
AND THE THOUGHT WAS SIMPLY WITH THE SURFACE LOT THERE TODAY,
THAT IT WAS MY THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE THE LEAST DISRUPTIVE
TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT IS SIMPLY WHAT IT WAS.
07:35:34PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YEAH.
I COULDN'T FIGURE OUT IF THERE JUST WASN'T ENOUGH DENSITY TO
ALLOW TO YOU BUILD ON THAT OR HOW IT ALL WORKED.
07:35:43PM >> WE COULD -- PER THE CURRENT ZONING, WE COULD DO UP TO
SEVEN TOWN HOMES GET SOMEWHERE BETWEEN SIX OR SEVEN WORK ON
THE SITE, BUT THEN THAT WOULD PUT MANY MORE CURB CUTS ON TO
THE STREETS.
WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PROVIDE ANY OF THE ON-STREET PARKING.
WE DON'T HAVE RESERVED ACCESS.
OPEN TO ANYONE IN THE COMMUNITY, WHETHER SOMEONE VISITING
THESE RESIDENTS, THESE BUSINESSES OR SOMEWHERE ELSE.
IT WAS SIMPLY A PIVOT I THOUGHT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO
AND A SMART URBAN INFILL DEAL.
07:36:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
07:36:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
07:36:23PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THIS IS UNUSUAL.
YOU DID THE RIGHT CALL.
YOU PLACED THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE BUILDINGS TO THE NORTH
-- I MEAN TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE TRAFFIC IS ON KENNEDY
BOULEVARD.
AND I REMEMBER THE BUILDING THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
THAT WAS DR. AVERY, A VETERINARIAN FROM THE '50s TO 2015 OR
SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
HE WAS A GREAT VETERINARIAN.
AND YOU DID IT RIGHT WHERE YOU PUT THE PARKING WHERE MOST OF
THE RESIDENTIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ARE, THE HOUSING AND SO
FORTH.
SO MORE PLEASANT ON THE EYE.
I COMMEND YOU ON THAT.
I WHISPERED TO MR. GUDES, THE SECOND DEVELOPER AND
INDIVIDUAL LOOKING TO BUILD SOMETHING THAT HAS COME UP
WITHOUT ANYONE ASKING THAT HAS 10% OF SOMETHING WE HAVE BEEN
TALKING ABOUT.
AND THIS WAS THE WORKHOUSE FORCING OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO
CALL IT BUT A DEED.
WE CAN'T LEAVE ANYONE BEHIND.
LITTLE EFFORT HERE AND THERE I THINK WILL CERTAINLY HELP THE
SITUATION THAT NOT ONLY THIS CITY IS IN BUT THE WHOLE
COUNTRY IS IN THE SAME SITUATION.
I WHISPERED TO MYSELF, THERE WAS A LOT -- THREE QUARTERS OF
A BLOCK WHERE I LIVE IN WEST TAMPA.
AND 650,000 FOR THE LOT.
TRUE, IT WAS 120 X 170.
TODAY I DROVE BY AND THE SIGN IS OFF.
EITHER THEY SOLD IT OR THEY GOT TIRED.
BUT HAD IT LIKE THAT FOR SIX MONTHS.
I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT IS COMING FROM, BUT 9 INDIVIDUALS NOW
THAT -- YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO MOVE BECAUSE PAY $200,000 OR
$300,000 MORE.
THESE THINGS FOR YOURSELF AND OTHER DEVELOPERS, THE NEED OF
THE COMMUNITY TO KEEP IT AS PLEASANT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND
AS AFFORDABLE AS POSSIBLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND I COMMEND YOU FOR THAT.
07:38:12PM >> THANK YOU.
07:38:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBER WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NO. REZ-23-15.
07:38:23PM >> HELLO.
ADRIAN LARAMIE.
201 NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
I HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THE PARKING PROBLEM -- THE EXTRA CARS
ON THE STREET.
I THINK THE PROJECT IS GREAT.
I WOULD MOVE IN IT MYSELF IF I COULD AFFORD TO.
BUT IT IS A BEAUTIFUL PLACE.
IT IS A GREAT LOCATION.
ONE THING IS THAT ON -- THE BUS AREA, IT ONLY GOES ONE EVERY
HOUR.
ONE BUS ON KENNEDY EVERY HOUR.
THAT IS REALLY NOT GOOD TRANSPORTATION.
THERE IS WALKING DISTANCE TO SHOPPING.
PUBLIX IS JUST DOWN THE STREET, BUT THE SIDEWALKS GOING
THERE ARE VERY IN NEED OF REPAIR AND ALSO THEIR VERY NARROW
AND IN SOME AREAS YOU CAN BARELY WALK ON THEM.
ANYWAY, LOOKING AT THIS NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE.
THIS IS WHERE I LIVE ON THIS SIDE OVER HERE.
IN IS A NEW PROJECT GOING IN.
IT HAS BEEN GOING ON.
BUILDING IT.
HAS BEEN FOR SIX MONTHS NOW.
THEY ARE NOT MOVING VERY FAST.
BUT THERE IS ACTUALLY -- THE DRIVEWAY IS RIGHT HERE ON
TAMPANIA.
AND THIS IS GOING TO LEAVE THE PARKING ON TAMPANIA VERY
RESTRICTED.
LIKE I SAID, I HAVE LIVE RIGHT HERE.
ONE DAY -- ONE EVENING, I WAS AT HOME, AND THE FIRE TRUCK
WAS COMING UP NORTH TAMPANIA.
THERE WAS A CAR PARKED ON MY SIDE OF THE STREET AND A CAR
PARKED ON THE OTHER SIDE.
GUESS WHAT, THE FIRE TRUCK COULDN'T GET THROUGH.
YOU HAD TO BACK UP AND GO AROUND IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS.
THE CITY HAS TO LOOK AT THESE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE BEING
BUILT AND REALIZE THAT IT MAY NOT BE GOOD FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE I WOULDN'T WANT TO BE THE PERSON ON THE
OTHER SIDE HAVING TO WAIT A FEW EXTRA MINUTES UNTIL THAT
FIRE TRUCK WAS AROUND AND GETS TO THEIR -- TO THEIR LOCATION
AND BE ABLE TO HELP THEM OUT.
WE SHOW THAT DOWN ON TAMPANIA, THE SAME THERE.
NOT ENOUGH ROOM FOR PEOPLE TO PARK.
YES, THEY ARE GOING TO BE HAVING PARKING ON THIS SIDE, BUT
ONCE IN A WHILE, PEOPLE ON THIS SIDE LIKE TO PARK.
AND AS THE CARS COME OFF KENNEDY, THEY ARE MOVING PRETTY
FAST ALL THE WAY UP THE STREET.
MY CAR WAS PARKED IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE.
AND THERE WAS A BIG OAK TREE THERE.
ONE MORNING I WOKE UP AND THE CAR WAS ON MY FRONT YARD.
SOMEONE HAD COME IN THAT NIGHT.
RAN ON THE END OF IT -- THE REAR END AND PUSHED IT ON TO THE
FRONT LAWN OF MY HOUSE SO I THINK CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO LOOK
AT THIS WHOLE PROJECT AND THE PARKING AS WELL.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
07:41:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:41:24PM >> HI, MY NAME IS EMILY HOLLORAN.
I AM AN ASSISTANT MANAGER OF A LOCAL BUSINESS RIGHT NEAR THE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD PROVIDE MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR
MY EMPLOYEES, MY CUSTOMERS, AND EMPLOYEES OF THE SURROUNDING
BUSINESSES.
THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO BRING IN MORE POSSIBLE CUSTOMERS
TO THE LOCAL, MORE POSSIBLE EMPLOYEES WHICH IS ALWAYS A GOOD
THING, AND OVERALL, CAN JUST HELP LOCALLY OWNED BUSINESSES
THAT ARE IN THE AREA.
IT WOULD ALSO CREATE MORE JOB OPPORTUNITIES SO THOSE TO ARE
MOVING HERE TO TAMPA, WHERE THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO
ARE MOVING HERE TO TAMPA.
THOSE WHO ARE IN THE COLLEGE RIGHT NEARBY.
THOSE WHO ARE FRESHLY GRADUATING.
THIS WILL JUST CREATE MORE OF AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THOSE WHO
ARE LOOKING FOR IT.
I MOVED TO TAMPA NOT LONG AGO BECAUSE I SAW THE OPPORTUNITY
HERE.
AND SO, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING THAT CAN HELP GIVE OTHERS THAT
OPPORTUNITY AND OTHER SMALL BUSINESSES THAT OPPORTUNITY, I
AM IN FULL SUPPORT.
THANK YOU.
07:42:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
07:42:48PM >> HI, GOOD EVENING.
KEN HOWARD.
2704 WEST NORTH A STREET.
I JOTTED DOWN A BUNCH OF NOTES HERE.
ARCHITECT PRACTICING IN TAMPA OVER 20 YEARS AND PART OF
MULTIPLE PROJECTS OF THIS COUNCIL -- A FEW THAT THIS COUNCIL
HAS APPROVED AND A FEW THAT YOU GUYS REJECTED.
I LIVE ON NORTH A ONE BLOCK AND MY HOUSE IS ON EVERY GRAPHIC
YOU HAVE SEEN THUS FAR.
I HAVE BEEN THERE THREE YEARS AND SAW DEVELOPMENT AND MOST
HAVE BEEN GOOD.
I WAS ORIGINALLY AGAINST THIS PROJECT.
NORTH A IS A RESIDENTIAL STREET AND CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU
HEARD FROM STAFF, NORTH A IS A RESIDENTIAL STREET, NOT A
TRANSITIONAL STREET.
OVER 80% SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.
TOWN HOMES, DUPLEXES, AIRBNBS AS YOU GET CLOSER TO ARMENIA
AND EASTWARD TO DOWNTOWN.
FROM ARMENIA TO MacDILL, ONE EXISTING SERVICE LOT.
THAT IS THIS PROJECT.
I DO NOT LIKE THE IDEA OF SURFACE LOTS REMAINING, I WILL
FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL IF ANY ADDITIONAL SURFACE LOTS ON
NORTH A.
I AM SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT FOR MULTIPLE REASONS.
WHAT MAKES A GREAT URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE DIVERSITY OF
HOUSING TYPES AND MORE IMPORTANTLY AND OFTEN OVERLOOKED
ON-STREET PARKING.
ON-STREET PARKING AS YOU ARE A AWARE FROM OTHER WORKSHOPS IS
AS SET FOR A COMMUNITY TO THRIVE.
EVERY GARAGE, DRIVEWAY, CURB CUT HAS ONE ON-STREET PARKING
SPACE AND REMOVES AN AMENITY.
TOWN HOMES ARE SLOWLY KILLING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
NORTH A IS AN AMAZING STREET, AND I HOPE TAMPA DRIVERS DO NOT
KNOW ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT A GREAT THOROUGHFARE AVOIDING
KENNEDY TRAFFIC.
PEOPLE WALKING THEIR DOGS AND GO TO RESTAURANTS ON KENNEDY.
ON-STREET PARKING SLOWS DOWN TRAFFIC, BUFFERS PEDESTRIANS
FROM CARS.
STREETS WITHOUT ON-STREET PARKING ARE CUT-THRUS AND THOSE
WIDE ENOUGH TO AVOID TRAFFIC.
WHY AM I TALKING OF ON-STREET PARKING, THEY HAVE MAINTAINED
ON-STREET PARK BIG THEIR DESIGN.
INCREASED BY FIVE SPACES AND MAINTAIN UPWARDS OF FOUR TO
FIVE SPACES OF NORTH A.
I AM FAST-FOWARDING BECAUSE I THINK I AM RUNNING OUT OF
TIME.
ARMORY GARDEN IS A LOW REMOVAL OF SHARED PARKING AND
PRIVATE GARAGES AND DRIVEWAYS.
EACH REMOVES TWO SPACES FROM THE STREET.
THE BY RIGHT COULD REMOVE ALL ON-STREET PARKING FROM
NORTH A.
I SUPPORT THIS PROJECT FOR MAINTAINING THE ON-STREET STREET
PARKING.
SECOND REASON, REMOVED THE PARKING TO THE ALLEY AND ALLOW
THE ALL TRAFFIC TO COME IN AND OUT OF THE ALLEY THAT
DEAD-ENDS ON TO ARMENIA.
THE FINAL REASON FOR SUPPORT, THE DEVELOPER HAS MODIFIED THE
PLANS TO ALLOW FOR A ONE-TO-ONE PARKING RATIO AND MOST
CITIES NOW LOOK TO A PARKING RATIO OF ONE PARKING STALL PER
BEDROOM WHICH WAS ILLUSTRATED EARLIER BY THE DEVELOPER.
ONE HOUSE PER BEDROOM ALLOWS FOR HOUSING FLEXIBILITY AND
ENCOURAGES SMALLER UNIT SIZES.
I HAVE 30 SECONDS.
07:46:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
30 SECONDS.
07:46:01PM >> OKAY, COOL.
ONE SPACE PER BEDROOM ALLOWS FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS ENCOURAGES DEVELOP TO HAVE MORE
UNITS AND LESS FOUR TO FIVE-BEDROOM HOME.
A FOUR AND FIVE-BEDROOM HOME IS QUICKLY CONVERTED INTO A
AIRBNB SERVING OVER SIX PEOPLE AND CREATING ADDITIONAL
PARKING.
SO I AM NO SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT MAINTAINING ON-STREET
PARKING WITH ONE-TO-ONE RATIO AND LACK OF CURB CUTS ON
NORTH A, THANK YOU.
07:46:36PM >> NATHAN HAGAN, SORRY FOR BEING UP HERE AGAIN.
I THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY HAVE A
CONVERSATION AND TALK OF SPECIFIC POLICY POINTS.
ONE OF MY FAVORITE THINGS ABOUT THIS PARKING IS THE SURFACE
PARKING.
COVERED PARKING, STRUCTURED PARKING IS VERY EXPENSIVE AND
VERY PERMANENT.
I KNOW WE ARE AT THE TAIL END OF A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SEASON
WHERE PARKING HAS COME UP A LOT WHICH I AM GLAD TO SEE.
IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS IF WE ELIMINATE PARKING FROM DOWNTOWN
TO WEST SHORE, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR THIS PARKING LOT?
I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE WE CAN REDEVELOP IT INTO A -- INTO
HOUSING.
IF HALF THE BUILDING IN FRONT WAS A PARKING GARAGE, THAT
WOULD FOREVER BE A PARKING GARAGE AND NEVER BE HOUSING.
FOR ME IT IS VERY INTERESTING.
NOT GERMANE TO THIS REZONING BUT SINCE IT WAS BROUGHT UP, IT
WILL BE WORTH SHARPENING OUR NICE TALKING ABOUT THIS ISSUE.
IRONICALLY ONE OF THE MOST INTERESTING PIECES OF THE PROJECT
FOR ME.
THANK YOU.
07:47:38PM >> SO FAR I AM NOT WALKING HOME.
ANYWAY, AS YOU HEARD BEFORE, SANDY SANCHEZ, 2705 WEST FIG
STREET IN THE ARMORY GARDENS COMMUNITY.
AS I SAID BEFORE I SUPPORT THIS PROJECT.
I THINK IT IS EVIDENT BY THE PREPARATION OF THE DEVELOPER
AND THE ATTORNEY HAS MADE, WHEN YOU ADD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
WAIVERS, THEY WERE PREPARED TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.
AND THIS HAS BEEN WITH THE COMMUNITY.
AND EVERY QUESTION THAT WE HAVE ASKED THEM, THEY HAVE
ANSWERED US.
THEY READILY ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY KIND OF INFORMATION.
WE FEEL LIKE WE HAVE BELT UP A PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP
WITH THEM.
AND HOPEFULLY A TRUST THAT WE CAN -- WE CAN MOVE FORWARD
WITH.
SO WE THINK THAT THIS IS A PROJECT, LIKE I SAID, THAT WITHIN
ARMORY GARDENS THAT WE CAN LIVE WITH.
WE ALWAYS ARE GOING TO HAVE THE PARKING ISSUES AND THE
TRAFFIC ISSUES, BUT, AGAIN, I AM HOPING MOBILITY WITH THEIR
NEW PARKING DIVISION AND ALL THEIR NEW RULES AND WORKSHOPS
AND PILOT PROGRAMS WILL HELP TAKE CARE OF SOME OF THOSE.
IF I DO WANT TO YOU KNOW THAT I SUPPORT THIS PROJECT.
THANK YOU.
07:48:57PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE IN CHAMBERS WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER THREE, FILE NO. REZ-23-15.
MADAM CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
07:49:08PM >>CLERK:
WE DO BUT HE IS NOT THERE ANYMORE.
MR. SEEL IS NOT THERE, SO, NO.
07:49:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
07:49:18PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
TYLER.
I HAVE KNOW HIS LAST NAME.
07:49:25PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
MIGHT HAVE BEEN ANOTHER TYLER TO COME UP.
07:49:30PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YOU MENTIONED MY NAME EARLIER OF HOUSING.
I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT FROM DAY ONE.
I SEE THIS.
THE DEVELOPERS ARE -- NOT ABIDING BUT APPEASING COUNCIL BY
PUTTING NUMBERS IN THE HOUSING UNITS.
YOU HAVE BEEN DOING THAT.
I APPRECIATE THAT, BUT I DON'T WANT THE COUNCIL TO BE
BAMBOOZLED DOWN THE ROAD WHEN WE WAS THESE DENSITY BONUSES
ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
WHEN I LOOK AT THIS PROJECT, 40 UNITS, CORRECT?
07:49:59PM >> YES, SIR.
07:50:00PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
FOUR WILL BE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
TWO WITH 80 AND TWO WITH 120.
07:50:07PM >> THAT'S CORRECT.
07:50:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
BONUS DENSITY WITH SO MANY NUMBERS OF
HOUSING UNITS BUT NOT THAT MANY AFFORDABLE UNITS AND THE
CRUTCH OF IT ALL.
WHAT I CAN SAY WHEN THE GENTLEMAN TALKED ABOUT.
WHEN NATHAN TALKED ABOUT PARKING GARAGES, THEY COST A LOT.
AND THIS TAKES AWAY -- A LOT FROM THE PROJECT OF HAVING
HOUSING SO I AM HOPING YOU.
YOU DO A GOOD JOB AND HOPEFULLY DOWN THE ROAD WITH SOME OF
THE PROJECTS LATER ON THAT WE LOOK AT THESE THINGS.
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT PARKING GARAGES AND BE ABLE TO DO MORE
IN THE NUMBER FOR REAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
THAT IS WHAT I HEARD ALL ALONG.
WE CAN'T DO AFFORDABLE HOUSING BECAUSE OF A PARKING GARAGE.
I HEARD THAT SO MANY TIMES FROM DEVELOPERS.
IF THIS GENTLEMAN HAD THE INTUITION TO LOOK AT THAT.
FOUR OUT OF THE 40 WHICH -- 36.
BUT I JUST WANT YOU TO HEAR THAT BEFORE I LEAVE HERE THAT
BUT UNDERSTAND THAT I AM GOING TO SOUND THE ALARM BECAUSE I
STILL BELIEVE WE CAN MAKE SOME THINGS HAPPEN.
AN OUR HOUSING DEPARTMENT NEED TO LOOK AT THE NUMBER WITH
THE BONUS DENSITY WITH THE PERCENTAGE AND THE AMOUNT OF
MONEY WE ARE GIVING WITH THESE DEVELOPMENTS.
I WANT YOU TO HEAR THAT BEFORE I GO.
I WILL SUPPORT THE PROJECT BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENING.
ONE OF THE GUYS THAT HAVE BEEN TELLING PEOPLE TO GO AND
APIECE COUNCIL A LITTLE BIT WITH HOUSING UNIT.
I APPRECIATE YOU FOR THAT BUT LOOK A LITTLE BIT MORE INTO
THE FUTURE AS WELL.
THANK YOU.
07:51:44PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY REBUTTAL.
07:51:49PM >> COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
WE ARE VERY PROUD OF THIS PROJECT AND COUNCIL SHOULD BE VERY
PROUD TO SUPPORT IT.
ABOUT HAPPY WITH THE COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
WE COULDN'T GET THERE WITH EVERY SINGLE NEIGHBOR, BUT WE
THINK A LOT OF EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO SUPPORT THE WAIVERS
REQUESTED.
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND I ASK COUNCIL FOR
YOUR SUPPORT AND THE PLEASURE OF DOWN SUPPORT, A REMINDER OF
THE SECOND READING JUNE 15 IF POSSIBLE.
THANK YOU.
07:52:17PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN .
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
07:52:28PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
YOU KNOW I WISH I COULD SAY NO TO THIS PROJECT, BUT I CAN'T.
BECAUSE I LOVE THE BUILDING THAT IS THERE.
THAT IS WHY I WAS ASKING EARLIER.
WILL EVERYTHING BE DEMOLISHED.
IT IS BEAUTIFUL -- THE VETERINARY CLINIC NEWS BE 100 YEARS
OLD OR CLOSE TO IT.
HOWEVER, LEGALLY, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF THINGS.
YOU HAVE THE COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
A LOT OF VOICES IN SUPPORT.
PEOPLE THAT ARE VERY INVOLVED IN THE COMMUNITY AND VERY
CRITICAL AND PAY ATTENTION AND THEY COME TO SUPPORT IT.
I THINK THAT SAYS A LOT.
THE DESIGN IS BEAUTIFUL.
MY COMPLIMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT.
AND YOU ANSWERED THE QUESTION OF THAT MISSING MIDDLE
HOUSING.
TALKING OF THE DENSITY ALONG THOSE BUSY CORRIDORS.
KENNEDY BOULEVARD WE KNOW.
SHAME THAT THE BUS ONLY RUNS EVERY HOUR.
MAY RUN EVERY HALF HOUR.
BUT I DON'T KNOW.
BUT, AGAIN, IT'S A NEEDED PROJECT.
I THINK IT IS A VERY GOOD PROJECT AND, AGAIN, THE COMMUNITY
CAME OUT IN SUPPORT.
YOU HAVE LETTER OF SUPPORT.
SO I THINK THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT.
I WOULD LIKE TO READ THIS ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY 2517 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, 111
NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE AND 2412 WEST NORTH A STREET IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO CG, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND
STOREFRONT COMMERCIAL OFFICE USES PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
07:54:06PM >> SECOND.
07:54:08PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ALONG WITH THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING
WILL ALLOW BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND CONSISTENT WITH
THE INTENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CMU-35 AND UMU-60 DES
WILLING NATION WITH 814.1.
ALSO WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 27-136, THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR ENCOURAGES
DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND
COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE DISCUSSED THE SURFACE PARKING.
WE DISCUSSED A LOT OF THINGS.
PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF
LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE.
I AGREE WITH THAT.
REGARDING THE WAIVERS.
I FIND THEM IN COMPLAINS WITH 27-139.4.
THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND IN NEED
OF THE WAIVER.
WAS DISCUSSED WHY KEEP THE SURFACE PARKING, BECAUSE IT HAS
BEEN IN THAT USE EXISTING FOR A WHILE NOW.
YOU HAVE THE BUILDING CLOSEST TO KENNEDY WHICH IS THE BUSIER
OF THE ROADS.
THE REQUESTED WAIVER WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH
OR INJURY THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHOSE PROPERTY WILL BE
AFFECTED BY THE WAIVER.
AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH FOR MY MOTION.
THANK YOU.
07:55:21PM >> SECOND.
07:55:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
07:55:30PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I THINK I SECONDED BEFORE VIERA BUT LET
VIERA HAVE IT.
VIERA CAN HAVE IT.
07:55:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
LET ME REPHRASE.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ANY DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE -- SORRY, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
07:55:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
I JUST WANTED TO SAY, AGAIN, TO REITERATE
WHAT COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO SAID OF REALLY WORKING WITH THE
COMMUNITY MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE AND MATTER A LOT.
SEEMS THAT MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO UNDERSTAND
THAT COUNCIL IS NOT -- IS LOOKING FOR THAT COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT.
AND SO I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THAT.
07:56:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
07:56:13PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
07:56:15PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
07:56:16PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
07:56:17PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
07:56:19PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
07:56:21PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
07:56:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
07:56:22PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 15, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
07:56:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE.

FILE NUMBER REZ 22-87.
7:56:43PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
7:56:47PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I'M SORRY, MS. DOCK, IF WE COULD LEAVE
CHAMBERS QUIETLY THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED.
PLEASE PROCEED, MS. DOCK.
7:56:59PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 5 IS REZ 22-87 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1200 NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
THE APPLICANT IS BEING REPRESENTED BY KAMI CORBETT, TO
REZONE PROPERTY FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL AND MAP MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT ONE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE USE OF RETAIL
SALES, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND RESTAURANT, OR OP 1 AND
MAP 1 USES.
AND JUST TO GIVE A QUICK BACKGROUND PRIOR TO PLANNING
COMMISSION COMING UP GIVING THEIR REPORT, THIS REQUEST, YOU
SAW AN APPLICATION FOR THIS PROPERTY FOR REZONING.
IT WAS BEFORE COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 9th.

IT WAS A REQUEST TO REZONE TO A PD.
AFTER THE FIRST READING, THE APPLICANT THEN REALIZED THAT
THEY WOULD LIKE THE ABILITY TO HAVE EXISTING HOTEL USE
ON-SITE TO BE -- TO BECOME A CONFORMING USE WITH THE
INTRODUCTION OF THE PD.
SO WHAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY IS AN ALLOWANCE TO EITHER
DEVELOP THIS PD WITH THE USES REQUESTED, OR FOR THE EXISTING
HOTEL USE TO REMAIN ON-SITE, BUT IT MUST COMPLY WITH OP 1
AND MAP 1 STANDARDS.
SO WHAT I WILL DO NOW IS TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO GIVE THEIR REPORT, AND THEN I WILL COME BACK AND GIVE MY
REPORT.
THANK YOU.
7:58:19PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
7:58:21PM >>SAM THOMAS:
PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN NORTH SHORT PLANNING DISTRICT NOT
WITHIN AN IDENTIFIED NEIGHBORHOOD BUT IS IN THE TAMPA
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND IS ADJACENT TO THE CARVER CITY
LINCOLN GARDENS NEIGHBORHOOD, JUST ON THE OTHER SIDE OF
WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
TRANSIT SERVICE IS PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON
WESTSHORE BOULEVARD, CHARLES B. WILLIAMS PARK IS THE CLOSEST
RECREATIONAL AREA APPROXIMATELY ONE BLOCK TO THE SOUTHEAST,
WITHIN THE COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND EVACUATION ZONE A AND
REZONING TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN

SHALL MITIGATE ANY KIND OF SHELTER SPACE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW
THE AREA IS URBAN IN NATURE.
THE SURROUNDING USES ARE ALL COMMERCIAL, OR HEAVY COMMERCIAL
USES, IN THE AREAS TOWARD A MORE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
TO THE NORTH GOING NORTH ALONG WESTSHORE BOULEVARD THERE'S
INTERNATIONAL MALL AND THEN AS YOU SAID HOW THE WESTSHORE
PLAZA ON THE OTHER SIDE.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
ALL ALONG WESTSHORE BOULEVARD, YOU CAN SEE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION RMU 100.
IN THE BLUE HERE IS THE PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC THAT IS JEFFERSON
HIGH SCHOOL.
YOU CAN SEE SOME MORE BLUE HERE WHICH IS PART OF TAMPA
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.
THIS LIGHT GRAY COLOR IS THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, AND THAT
DESIGNATION IS MEANT TO SERVE ANY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THAT'S
COMPATIBLE WITH THOSE USES.
YOU WILL SEE A LITTLE BIT OF R 25 SOUTH OF 275.
APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 2.8 ACRES TO PERMIT 498
DWELLING UNITS, RETAIL USES THAT ARE PRESENTLY OCCUPIED AT
THE SITE.
REGIONAL MIXED USE 100 SUPPORTS HIGH INTENSITY HIGH DENSITY
HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL MAJOR OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL SERVING

DEVELOPMENTS IN AN AREA SUPPORTED BY MAJOR TRANSPORTATION
FACILITIES.
TRANSIT, THERE ARE SEVERAL TRANSIT STOPS LOCATED WITHIN
PROXIMITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE PD PROPOSES A 7 STORY RESIDENTIAL TOWER THAT IS TOWARDS
NORTH OCCIDENT STREET AND WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
THE MAP CATEGORY RUNNING ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE
SITE, THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER IS PUSHED BACK TOWARD OCCIDENT
STREET, AND THE PD CONNECTS THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER ADDRESSING
THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES.
ADDITIONALLY RETAIL IS PROPOSED ALONG WESTSHORE BOULEVARD
AND IS PLACED CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ENTRANCES ARE ORIENTED TOWARDS AND CONNECTED TO A PROPOSED
10 TO 14-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD AND
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL
TOWER AND RETAIL TO THE PARKING GARAGE WHICH IS ACCESSIBLE
VIA THE DRIVE THAT RUNS ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE
PROPERTY.
IN CONCLUSION THE PROPERTY -- PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS
MANY POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO THE
CITY'S POPULATION, ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON UNDERUTILIZED
LAND AND HOUSING AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S
PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE

PLAN.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:01:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
8:01:59PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PD REQUEST THAT IS BEFORE YOU THAT SAM WAS TELLING YOU
OF THE SITE, GIVING A BRIEF OVERVIEW, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN
THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THIS REQUEST.
SO IN ORIENTING YOU WITH THE SITE PLAN, THIS IS WESTSHORE
BOULEVARD, THIS IS OCCIDENT.
SO THE ENTRY TO THE SITE WILL BE LOCATED HERE WITH THE DRIVE
THAT WILL BE CREATED WITH THE DROP-OFF AND VALET HERE, THIS
IS THE DESIGNATION IN MAP 1 OP 1 ZONING DISTRICT AND AS
MENTIONED EARLIER BY SAM, ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
PROPOSED IS WITHIN WHAT IS CURRENTLY THE OP 1 ON THE SITE,
BUT THE PD PLAN PROVIDES FOR 7,502 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL,
398 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
THE FRONTAGE ON THE SITE IS 300 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND DEPTH
MEASURING AT 622.65 FEET.
SO THE SITE CURRENTLY HAS AN EXISTING HOTEL USE WHICH IS
WHAT I REFERRED TO EARLIER IN THE INTRODUCTION PROVIDING A
BACKGROUND FOR THE REQUEST, AND I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE
TO SHOW YOU SHORTLY.
AND THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE USES THAT ARE CONTAINED
WITHIN THE PD, OR FOR THAT HOTEL USE TO REMAIN ON-SITE, AND
BE A CONFORMING USE.

ALSO, WITH THE REQUEST, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
WESTSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE
WESTSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT STANDARDS.
THE REQUEST HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY URBAN DESIGN AND IT IS --
IT DOES MEET THOSE STANDARDS.
THIS IS THE NORTHERN ELEVATION.
THE TOP IS THE EASTERN ELEVATION AND THIS IS THE WEST
ELEVATION.
AND THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
I'LL SHOW THE AERIAL MAP.
THIS IS THE ZONING MAP.
THIS IS WESTSHORE BOULEVARD.
THIS IS 275.
THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED.
YOU CAN SEE THE OP ZONING THAT IS LOCATED SURROUNDING THE
SITE, TO THE NORTH AND EAST, AND THEN YOU HAVE YOUR MAP 1
DESIGNATION.
AND THEN ALONG CYPRESS YOU HAVE YOUR OTHER COMMERCIAL ZONING
THAT FOLLOW THAT CORRIDOR.
THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE CURRENTLY.
THIS IS ON OCCIDENT LOOKING TOWARDS THE SITE.
THIS IS ALSO ON OCCIDENT, WEST OF THE SITE.
SO THE SITE IN THIS PICTURE IS TO THE RIGHT.
THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE ACROSS THE STREET.
ACROSS OCCIDENT.

THIS IS ALSO ACROSS THE STREET WEST OF THE SITE.
THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE.
THIS IS SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE.
SO IT'S HEADING TOWARD WESTSHORE AND CYPRESS.
THEN AS YOU COME BACK UP CLOSER TO THE SITE, THAT'S EAST OF
THE SITE.
ON WESTSHORE.
NORTHEAST OF THE SITE.
BACK NORTH OF THE SITE.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST, FINDS THE REQUEST
INCONSISTENT, AND FINDINGS OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COMMENT
RELATED TO THE WAIVERS REQUESTED.
THE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
IF COUNCIL SHOULD DECIDE TO APPROVE THE REQUEST.
SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
8:06:30PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
8:06:34PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU.
8:06:35PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
PETITIONER?
8:06:36PM >>KAMI CORBETT:
HILL, WARD, HENDERSON, 101, THIS IS A
HOUSEKEEPING ITEM.
WE ALWAYS INTENDED TO RETAIN THE O P AND MAP DESIGNATION.
WHEN WE CAME BACK AND ASKED INFORM THIS MOTION FOR THIS

FIRST READING WE EXPLAINED TO YOU THAT WE ARE THE CONTRACT
PURCHASER, PRO RESIDENTIAL, CONTRACT PURCHASER.
WE HAVE AN OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, THE SELLER, WHO IS
ALLOWING US TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT FOR
OUR INTENDED USE, BUT WANTS TO BE KIND OF IN A POSITION,
SAME POSITION AS THEY ARE TODAY SHOULD WE NOT CLOSE ON THE
PROPERTY, AND WHERE THEY ARE TODAY IS THEY HAVE OP 1 AND MAP
ZONING, AND REALLY WHAT HAPPENED IS DURING THE RC, THE OP 1
AND MAP 1 DESIGNATION DID NOT GET RETAINED IN THE TITLE
WHICH MEANS IT DIDN'T GET ADVERTISED.
SO IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, WE ASKED FOR THE FIRST
READING, WE READVERTISED THE APPLICATION, AND WE RENOTICED
IT, AND PUT A SIGN OUT AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY CALLS OR
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHANGE THAT WE PRESENTED.
SO WASN'T PLANNING ON REPRESENTING, OUR JUSTIFICATIONS FOR
THE PD OR THE WAIVERS THIS EVENING.
IN THE INTEREST OF YOUR TIME, AND WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
8:07:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO
SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5, FILE REZ 22-87?
DOUGH WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE, MADAM CLERK?
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
8:08:26PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
I MOVE AN -- STRIKE THAT. ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1200 NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OP 1 OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL AND M.A.P. 1 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, RETAIL SALES, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY,
RESTAURANT, OR OP 1 AND M.A.P. 1 USES, PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:09:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:09:11PM >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY JUST FOR THE RECORD, I FIND THAT
THERE IS COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS MENTIONED IN THE PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF REPORT COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE SECTION 27-136 AS WELL AS OTHER FINDINGS CITED IN THE
REPORT.
THANK YOU.
AND WITH PROVISIONS.

8:09:32PM >> SECOND.
8:09:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:09:38PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:09:40PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:09:41PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:09:44PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
8:09:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:09:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:09:48PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:09:49PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4th,
2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:09:59PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9.
FILE REZ 23-05.
8:10:04PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
8524 NORTH MULBERRY STREET.
PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS-50 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
8:10:22PM >>SAM THOMAS:
PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT.
THE SULPHUR SPRINGS NEIGHBORHOOD.
TRANSIT SERVICES PROVIDED APPROXIMATELY 0.25 MILES AWAY AT
NORTH MULBERRY STREET AND EAST WATERS AVENUE.
NORTH TAMPA PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY
LOCATED WILLIAM 0.15 MILES SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE AND IS NOT

WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE.
LOOKING AT THE AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE, MULBERRY, YOU
CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
USES.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE UNDERNEATH RESIDENTIAL 10
DESIGNATION WHICH IS THE DESIGNATION OF THIS AREA, YOU CAN
SEE A LITTLE PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC DOWN HERE AT THE BOTTOM
CORNER.
THAT'S A SCHOOL DOWN THERE.
APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 0.2 ACRES TO PERMIT TWO
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
THIS PORTION OF NORTH MULBERRY STREET AS AN EXISTING FINE
GRAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, BETWEEN YUKON STREET HAS A
DENSITY OF 6.1 ACRES PER ACRE ALLOWED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL
10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF 9 UNITS PER ACRE IS BELOW THE
MAXIMUM OF 10 UNITS PER ACHE AREA LOUD UNDER THE R-10
DESIGNATION.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS FOUND IT IS COME RABBLE AND
COME FAT INTERNATIONAL WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN LONG
THIS PORTION OF NORTH MULBERRY STREET.
REZONING IN SITE WILL OFFER DEVELOPMENT UNDER ENVISIONED AND
PLANNED FOR AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING COMMUNITIES FOR
TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION. IN CONCLUSION, PLANNING

COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
8:12:23PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
QUESTIONS?
8:12:30PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
LET'S GO AHEAD AND SHARE THE AERIAL VIEW.
AS YOU SEE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED, TO THE
NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST ARE ALL RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY, ALL ZONED RS-50.
YOU HAVE EAST YUKON TO THE NORTH, TO THE EAST YOU HAVE NORTH
MULBERRY STREET, TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE EAST STEWARD STREET,
TO THE WEST YOU HAVE NORTH 13th STREET.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS.
YOU HAVE PARCEL A AND PARCEL B.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOME AT THIS TIME.
THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS AT 35 FEET.
VEHICULAR ACCESS COMES FROM PARCEL A, COMES FROM NORTH
MULBERRY STREET HERE, AND PARCEL B COMES FROM EAST YUKON
STREET RIGHT HERE.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 9,639 SQUARE FEET.
THERE'S A TOTAL OF 2 PARKING SPACES THAT ARE REQUIRED, AND 2

PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
PARCEL A COMES TO 4,819 SQUARE FEET AND ALSO PARCEL B ALSO
COMES TO 4,819 SQUARE FEET.
I WILL NOW PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, THE PARCEL A, ELEVATION TO THE EAST.
NORTH.
WEST.
AND SOUTH.
I WILL NOW PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS FOR PARCEL B PROVIDED BY
THE APPLICANT.
ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
WEST.
SOUTH.
AND EAST.
I WILL SHOW YOU THE PICTURES THAT I TOOK ON-SITE.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE AS IS.
YOU HAVE THAT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THERE.
AS YOU SEE, THIS IS FACING THE WEST, SO YOU HAVE EAST YUKON
STREET HERE.
YOU HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE.
AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ON BOTH SIDES OF EAST YUKON
STREET.
TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE MORE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY.
ALSO TO THE SOUTHEAST, YOU HAVE MORE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.

LOOKING TO THE NORTHEAST, YOU HAVE THAT EAST YUKON AND NORTH
MULBERRY.
DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE PROPERTY, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL.
AND TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY ALSO RESIDENTIAL.
I WILL SHOW THE SITE PLAN ONE MORE TIME.
THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE
REVISION SHEET AS PER THE STAFF REPORT BETWEEN FIRST AND
SECOND READING.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:17:32PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
PETITIONER?
GOOD EVENING.
MY NAME IS MARIO ESPAILLAT LINGER LANE, 33604.
THE STAFF DID A GREAT JOB EXPLAINING EVERYTHING THAT WE ARE
PLANNING TO DO.
SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
8:17:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WHO WISHES TO SPEAK
TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9, FILE REZ 23-05?
IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE?

8:18:14PM >>THE CLERK:
NO.
8:18:15PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
8:18:16PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN GUDES,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION PASSES.
WHO DO WE HAVE, COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
8:18:27PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ITEM NUMBER 9, FILE
REZ 23-05, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 8524 NORTH MULBERRY STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
INCLUDING REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING,
AND I WOULD LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THE PROPOSED
REZONING WILL ALLOW BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND THAT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE R-10 DESIGNATIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE
POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PROVIDE
ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION,
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES OR
ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION,
CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.

8:19:22PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
8:19:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY CAN COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:19:27PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:19:31PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:19:32PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:19:34PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:19:35PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:19:37PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:

8:19:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:19:41PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA BEING ABSENT AT
VOTE.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4th,
2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:19:51PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10.
FILE REZ 23-17.
8:19:58PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS REQUEST IS BEING PROPOSED TO REZONE AT THE LOCATION
4510 SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND FOLIO NUMBER 129 OH
49.0005.
PROPOSED REZONE FROM CG AND CI TO CI.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
8:20:21PM >>SAM THOMAS:
PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING

DISTRICT.
TRANSIT SERVICE IS PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON SOUTH
DALE MABRY HIGHWAY.
FOSTER PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED
WITHIN A HALF A MILE TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA
AND COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND EVACUATION ZONE.
HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
YOU CAN SEE IT IS JUST TO THE WEST OF THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY,
THE CSX RAILROAD TRACK.
YOU HAVE THE HOME DEPOT TO THE NORTH.
AND YOU HAVE THE BARRIS CONDOS TO THE OTHER SIDE OF DALE
MABRY HIGHWAY. ALONG THIS SECTION OF DALE MABRY
TO THE EAST IS MAINLY COMMERCIAL IN CHARACTER.
AS YOU MOVE AWAY OVER TO THE WEST DALE MABRY YOU HAVE
MULTIFAMILY ATTACHED, AND THEN SOME SINGLE-FAMILY.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
AS YOU CAN SEE ALL ALONG EAST SIDE OF DALE MABRY IS THE
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION.
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF DALE MABRY YOU HAVE THE COMMUNITY MIXED
USE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THEN YOU HAVE PUBLIC
RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE HERE WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE PALMA
CEIA LITTLE LEAGUE FIELD, AND THAT TRANSITIONS THEN TO THE
RESIDENTIAL 10 ON THE OTHER SIDE AS WELL.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 0.22 ACRES -- THAT IS

NOT RIGHT.
IT'S NOT 0.22 ACRES.
I'M SORRY.
TO COMMERCIAL.
BECAUSE THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN AN ABUNDANCE OF
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE SUBJECT
SITE, AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS SEPARATED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL
USES BY SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND SELMON EXPRESSWAY,
RAILROAD TRACKS, THE MOST INTENSIVE DISTRICT IS COM
COMPARABLE COMPATIBLE WITH THE, IS WITHIN A MIXED USE
CORRIDOR.
THEREFORE ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHOULD ADDRESS THE
MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICY OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:23:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
8:23:11PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
FIRST I SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW.
I WILL GIVE YOU A VIEW OF THE PROPERTY AS YOU SEE OUTLINED
IN RED.
THIS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS ZONED PD.
AND ALSO CG.
WE HAVE COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTH.

TO THE SOUTH, IT'S ZONED CG AND CI WITH ALSO COMMERCIAL
USES.
TO THE WEST, YOU WILL HAVE VACANT LAND, AND ALSO VACANT
LAND, ALSO A CONDOMINIUM.
I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES TO COME.
AND TO THE EAST YOU WILL HAVE VACANT LAND, AND ALSO THE CSX
RAILROAD.
SO THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 4.82 ACRES IN SIZE.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A COMMERCIAL BUILDING.
AS YOU SEE, THE SITE IS RIGHT HERE ON SOUTH DALE MABRY.
I WILL SHOW PICTURES AS YOU WENT OUT TO THE SITE.
AS I POINT TO THE PROPERTY, YOU WILL SEE WHAT IS NOW
ON-SITE.
AS YOU SEE THE PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN RIGHT HERE.
AND THE "WASH HAPPY" HASHTAG AND THE ESTABLISHMENT.
8:25:03PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANKS FOR POINTING OUT THAT.
8:25:07PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
TO THE SOUTH, YOU WILL SEE MORE COMMERCIAL.
YOU HAVE THAT JAZZ THAI RESTAURANT HERE, RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY OVER HERE TO THE WEST.
TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE JONI'S PET SALON, COMMERCIAL
ESTABLISHMENT.
DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SITE YOU HAVE THE FAIR OAKS
CONDOMINIUM.
AND AS I AM LOOKING NORTH DOWN DALE MABRY YOU WILL HAVE MORE
COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
THIS IS EUCLIDEAN SO NO SITE PLAN WAS NEEDED AND THERE IS NO
REVISION SHEET.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:26:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
8:26:27PM >> STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT.
8:26:31PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SEEING NONE, THANK YOU.
8:26:33PM >> ALEX SCHALER HERE ON BEHALF OF REZ 23-17, THE EUCLIDEAN
REZONING WHICH HAS NOW LOST THE SUSPENSE OF WHAT IT WILL
EVENTUALLY BE.
THIS IS LOCATED ALONG SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY JUST EAST.
I WON'T SPEND A TON OF TIME REVISITING THE LOCATION BUT I
WOULD LIKE TO NOTE THE STAFF REPORT ONLY REFERENCED ONE
PARCEL.
THERE ARE TWO.
THERE'S A PARCEL RUNNING RIGHT ALONG THE CSX RAILROAD.
THEY ARE BOTH NOTICED.
JUST SO A TOTAL OF 4.82 ACRES.
AS YOU CAN SEE THE MAP OF THE CURRENT ZONING IS A LITTLE BIT
ODD THE WAY IT'S DESIGNATED.
THESE ARE TWO PARCELS HERE.
U.K. THERE ARE SOME SMALL PORTIONS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW
THAT ARE CURRENTLY COMMERCIAL GENERAL.

THE REST OF THE SITE IS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
SO OUR PROPOSED REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS TO CHANGE THE
ENTIRE SITE IS COVERED IN THE CI ZONING DESIGNATION SO WE
DON'T HAVE THOSE RANDOM CLIPS OF THE SITE THAT REMAIN IN CG.
STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT --
8:28:07PM >> IF I MAY STOP YOU THERE.
PLEASE PROCEED.
8:28:12PM >> IT'S FOUND CONSISTENT ACROSS ALL DEPARTMENTS AND I WILL
CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION AND I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
8:28:22PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR PETITIONER?
IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER 10, FILE REZ 23-17?
CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
8:28:44PM >>THE CLERK:
NO.
8:28:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:28:57PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THIS IS NUMBER 10.
8:29:02PM >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I TRIED TO GET YOUR ATTENTION BEFORE YOU
CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.

8:29:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
WE HAVE ALREADY CLOSED IT.
NOW WE HAVE TO REOPEN IT.
8:29:09PM >>CATE WELLS:
I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT IF COUNCIL WAS
INCLINED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE, I HAVE HANDWRITTEN IN THE
FOLIO NUMBER THAT WAS JUST ADDED TO THE TITLE OF THE
ORDINANCE.
THE APPLICANT CONFIRMED THAT THEY DID PROPERLY NOTICE IT TO
INCLUDE BOTH THE STREET ADDRESS, THE 4510 SOUTH DALE MABRY
AND THE FOLIO NUMBER.
THE FOLIO NUMBER WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT SO I
DIDN'T PICK UP ON THE FACT THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER PARCEL TO
BE INCLUDED IN THE TITLE OF THE ORDINANCE.
AND THE ORDINANCE WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE SECOND READING.
8:29:45PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU, MS. WELLS.
I BELIEVE COUNCILMAN MIRANDA IS GOING TO READ THE MOTION HAS
THE CORRECT FOLIO NUMBER.
8:29:51PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I HOPE SO.
FILE 10, REZ 23-17.
ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 4510
SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND CI
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE PROVIDING AN

EFFECTIVE DATE, FOLIO NUMBER IS 129049/0005.
AND THIS IS EUCLIDEAN ZONING, AND IT MEETS ALL THE GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE SUNSET PROPERTY
ZONING DISTRICT CURRENTLY ENCOMPASSES MOST OF THE SUBJECT
SITE AND IS PRESENTED TO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SITE DUE
TO THE ABUNDANCE OF COMMERCIAL USE ONE HALF MILE OF THE
SUBJECT AND THAT THE SITE SUBJECT IS SEPARATED BY ANY
RESIDENTIAL USE BY SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY, I FIND THE
REZONING REQUEST TO BE COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING AREA CONSIST STING OF LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2,
15.2.4.
8:31:02PM >> SECOND.
8:31:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE.
8:31:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:31:25PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:31:27PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:31:28PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:31:31PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
8:31:31PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
8:31:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:31:34PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4th,
2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
8:31:42PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
8:31:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
I AM RECUSING MYSELF FROM THIS NEXT CASE BECAUSE I HAVE AN
INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SAME BLOCK AS THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND I ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON THIS
QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER TO AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF A CONFLICT
OF INTEREST AND TO ENSURE A R A FAIR PROCEEDING FREE FROM
POTENTIAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE.
I WOULD LIKE THIS ENTERED INTO THE RECORD.
8:32:08PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN
MANISCALCO SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11.
FILE REZ 23-20.
8:32:23PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PROPOSED REZONING AT THE LOCATION 5802 AND 04 NORTH
FLORIDA AVENUE AND 103 WEST HENRY AVENUE, PROPOSED REZONING
FROM SH-CI TO SH-PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION.
THOMAS THOMAS PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING

DISTRICT IN THE OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD, NORTH
FLORIDA AVENUE IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR AND TRANSIT
SERVICE IS PROVIDED 0.1 MILES NORTHEAST OF THE SITE ON
IDLEWILD AVENUE AND FLORIDA AVENUE.
SEMINOLE HEIGHTS GARDEN CENTER IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL
FACILITY LOCATED WITHIN 0.17 MILES EAST OF THE SITE.
AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND
A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE.
REZONING INCREASING THE NUMBER OF UNITS SHALL MITIGATE
SHELTER SPACE.
THERE IS AN AERIAL OVERVIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE
SURROUNDING AREA.
YOU CAN SEE IT OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
THE SURROUNDING USES ON NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE ARE COMMERCIAL
IN CHARACTER.
AS YOU MOVE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IT IS A MIX OF
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES AND FOR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
USES NEED TO BE JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, MAJOR
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT IS RELATIVELY NEW.
THERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USES.
THE SITE RECOGNIZED UNDER FUTURE LAND USES, COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL 35 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35.
THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO LAND USES IS THAT THE
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES
ARE WHERE IS THE CG 35 DOES NOT.

YOU CAN SEE IT THEN TRANSITIONS INTO SINGLE-FAMILY
NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE R-20 AND THEN INTO THE R-10
DESIGNATION.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REZONE 0.48 ACRES TO PERMIT 20
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS.
THE REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE LAND
THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY AN TIPS ADVERTISE
INTERESTED UNDER THE DESIGNATIONS.
THE PD PROPOSES STRUCTURES ORIENTED TOWARDS THE
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND ENCOURAGES
BUILDING ENTRANCES TO CONNECT THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
THE PD PROPOSES INTERNAL CAUSE TO THE SIDEWALKS ALONG WEST
HENRY AVENUE AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS WILL HELP ENSURE THAT THEY
INTERCONNECT WITH FUTURE EXISTING SIDEWALKS ON ADJACENT
PROPERTIES.
THE PROPOSAL HAS FRONT ENTRANCE ENTRANCES ORIENTED TOWARDS
WEST HENRY AVENUE AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, PROVIDING
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND CONNECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED 5-FOOT
SIDEWALK ALONG HENRY AVENUE AND THE 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
FLORIDA AVENUE.
ADDITIONALLY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES THE USE OF
ALLEY, UNITS 15 THROUGH 20 HAVE VEHICULAR ALLEY ACCESS TO
THE WEST TO HELP PRESERVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND A MORE
PLEASANT STREETSCAPE ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THAT IF APPROVED
DELINEATE THE FUTURE LAND USE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READINGS.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REQUEST
CONSISTENT WITH TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:35:36PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
8:35:38PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE, THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE ZONE SH-CI WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.
TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE ZONE SHRN, CI WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL USE.
TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE ZONE SH-CI WHICH IS A COMMERCIAL USE,
AND TO THE WEST YOU HAVE ZONE SH-RS WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.
AS YOU SEE ON NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE HERE.
AND WEST HENRY AVENUE.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 39,966 SQUARE FEET,
OR APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRES IN SIZE.
SO THE PROPERTIES ALLOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE

INTERSECTION OF WEST HENRY AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT, AND ALSO OCCUPIED BY PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONAL USE.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 20 UNITS WITHIN FOUR BUILDINGS,
AS YOU SEE ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR.
THE TOTAL BUILDING AREA WILL BE 16,810 SQUARE FEET.
THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS AT 41.67 FEET.
A TOTAL OF 40 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND THE APPLICANT
IS PROVIDING 43 PARKING SPACES.
ACCESS IS PROVIDED FROM NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE TO THE EAST.
AND WEST HENRY AVENUE TO THE SOUTH.
AND THERE'S ALSO AN ALLEY TO THE WEST.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THERE'S AN ELEVATION FOR BUILDING 3.
ELEVATION TO THE EAST.
ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH.
ELEVATION TO THE WEST.
AND ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
AND I WILL SHOW AN ELEVATION FOR BUILDING 1 AND 4.
YOU HAVE THE EAST ELEVATION.
AND THE WEST ELEVATION.
FOR A TOWN HOME BUILDING NUMBER 2, YOU SEE THE EAST
ELEVATION.
WEST ELEVATION.
SOUTH ELEVATION.

AND EAST ELEVATION.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE, I WILL SHOW YOU THE PICTURES THAT
I TOOK.
FIRST PICTURE OF THE VACANT SITE.
ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE VACANT SITE.
LOOKING NORTH FLORIDA, NORTH AND SOUTH, TO THE NORTH.
YOU WILL SEE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES ALL NORTH AND
SOUTH.
HERE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST HENRY AND NORTH FLORIDA,
YOU WILL SEE THERE IS A CAR LOT HERE TO THE WEST -- I'M
SORRY, TO THE EAST.
LOOKING DIRECTLY SOUTH, YOU WILL SEE A CAR REPAIR SHOP.
LOOKING DIRECTLY EAST, YOU WILL SEE A DOMINO'S PIZZA.
AND LOOKING DIRECTLY WEST, YOU WILL SEE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY.
I WANT TO SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN ONE MORE TIME SO YOU CAN
SEE IT.
ALL FOUR BUILDINGS PROPOSED WITH A TOTAL OF 20 UNITS.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THREE WAIVERS, SO THERE IS A
REVISION, AND I WILL HAVE MY ARBORIST TALK ABOUT IT IN A
SECOND, BUT WAIVER NUMBER ONE WILL BE DELETED, AND WAIVER
NUMBER FOUR WILL REMAIN, AND I WILL HAVE ERIN PROVIDE A
REVISED REVISION SHEET TO COUNCIL.
WE HAVE THREE WAIVERS HERE.
ONE FROM URBAN DESIGN AND TWO FROM NATURAL RESOURCES, AND I

WILL HAVE ERIN SPEAK IN A COUPLE OF MINUTES.
BUT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
PETITION AND FINDS THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISIONS TO THE
REVISED REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO ERIN MAHER FROM NATURAL RESOURCES.
8:43:01PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
ERIN MAEHR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THERE ARE SOME
MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
EARLIER TODAY, I SENT OUT AN REVISED REVISION SHEET THAT
REFLECTED THESE CHANGES.
THE FIRST CHANGE AFTER SPEAKING WITH THE APPLICANT AND THE
APPLICANT'S ARBORIST, THE CITATION NOTE WAS AMENDED IN THE
REVISION SHEET TO $3,219.
THE SECOND CHANGE IS RELATED TO LANDSCAPE WAIVER.
IT WAS REQUESTED THAT WAIVER NUMBER 1 BE REMOVED AS IT WAS
DUPLICATED WITH WAIVER NUMBER 4.
WAIVER NUMBER 4 WILL REMAIN ON THE SITE PLAN.
THAT'S REFERENCING THE STAFF REPORT.
THOSE WAIVER NUMBERS.
THOSE ARE ALL THE CHANGES TO THE WAIVER SHEET AND THE
APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO THESE CHANGES.
NATURAL RESOURCES HAS AN OVERALL FINDING OF CONSISTENT AS

GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET AND EXCEEDED.
NO WAIVERS WERE NEEDED FOR ANY OF THE VEHICLE USE AREA
BUFFERS, AND ONE NONHAZARDOUS GRAND TREE HAS BEEN PRESERVED
ON-SITE.
THAT'S IT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'M HERE.
8:44:11PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
SEEING NONE, PETITIONER.
8:44:22PM >>TRUETT GARDNER:
400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE, GARDNER BREWER
HUDSON. WITH ME IS MEGAN SMITH IS PLUGGING IN. IN THE
INTEREST OF TIME, GIVEN ZAIN'S EXPLANATION AND FULL FINDING
OF CONSISTENCY AND NO KNOWN OPPOSITION, I WILL BE BRIEF, BUT
WE REPRESENT MIDDLE BAY HOMES, THEIR NORTH STAR FOR THIS
PROJECT HAS BEEN TO PROVIDE A HIGH QUALITY THOUGHTFUL
PROJECT FOR SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, AND I JUST WANTED TO WALK YOU
THROUGH A COUPLE OF THE DESIGN FEATURES THAT MEET THAT, IF
WE CAN PULL THIS UP.
I'M NOT GOOD WITH TECHNOLOGY SO I BRING THESE ALL-STARS IN
AND WE ARE STILL FUMBLING.
WELL, WE WON'T USE VISUALS, WE WILL JUST USE OUR MOUTHS.
WE ARE GOOD AT THAT.
A COUPLE OF DESIGN FEATURES I WANTED TO POINT OUT WHICH WERE
MENTIONED BEFORE, ONE AS IT RELATES TO HENRY AND FLORIDA.
THESE HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO HAVE -- I GOT ONE GRAPHIC.

I KNOW I HAVE.
I KNOW THE ELMO WORKS.
8:46:05PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THERE YOU GO.
THERE YOU GO.
8:46:31PM >> THIS IS THE ELEVATION FOR HENRY WHICH IS SIMILAR TO
FLORIDA.
YOU CAN SEE IT'S GOT THE NICE STOOPS, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS THAT
CONNECTS THE 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ON HENRY, 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ON
FLORIDA, AGAIN YOU CAN SEE THE QUALITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
HERE.
THESE ARE FOR-SALE TOWNHOMES.
THE 20 UNITS VERSUS WHAT THIS COULD BE ALLOWED FOR WHICH IS
29.
I THINK WE WERE DESIGNING TO ABOUT 53% OF THE POTENTIAL OF
THIS IS FOR QUALITY, NOT PACK A BUNCH OF DENSITY IN, GIVEN
THE HIGH PROFILE NATURE.
THERE IS ALSO A DOG PARK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STREET,
AND THEN THE ACCESS IS ALL INTERNAL, ONE INGRESS-EGRESS OFF
OF HENRY, AND THEN ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE IS AN ALLEY,
AND IT'S GREAT USE OF ACCESS THERE.
AND I WILL LET MEGAN RUN THROUGH THE WAIVERS REAL QUICK JUST
SO YOU ARE AWARE OF THOSE, AND HOW THOSE WORK AND WHAT THEY
ARE.
8:47:32PM >> MEGAN SMITH, GARDNER BREWER HUDSON. WE HAVE THREE
WAIVERS THAT WE ARE REQUESTING.

THE FIRST ONE IS FOR THE SETBACKS TO BUILD-TO LINE WITH THE
INTERNAL BUILDING THAT'S THERE, IT'S NOT FACING PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND SIDEWALKS, AND SO THAT'S FACING THE DOG
PARK.
THE NEXT WAIVER IS ABOUT THE TWO NONHAZARDOUS GRAND LIVE
OAKS BEING REMOVED LOCATED ON THE SITE AND ARE DETERIORATING
AND SO THEY ARE REMOVING THOSE AND SAVING ONE TREE THAT IS
IN PRESERVATION QUALITY.
AND FUNNEL WE ARE REQUESTING A REDUCTION OF OUR USE-TO-USE
BUFFER TO 2.3 FEET, AND THAT'S SPECIFICALLY FOR THE VEHICLE
BACKING AREA AS SHOWN ON THE DOCKET TO THE RIGHT.
THE STRUCTURE WILL BE SET BACK 13.8 FEET SO IT IS MEETING
THAT BUFFER REQUIREMENT.
AND WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:48:40PM >>TRUETT GARDNER:
A LOT OF TIMES WE ARE REQUESTING PARKING
WAIVES FOR DENSE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS, AND IN THIS
INSTANCE, I THINK IT'S MORE SUITABLE WITH THE TOWNHOUSE, 40
SPACES REQUIRED, 43 BEING PROVIDED, SO TWO PER UNIT PLUS
ANOTHER 3 FOR GUESTS.
SO AGAIN, THIS GOES TO THE THOUGHTFUL NATURE OF THIS, AND
HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
8:49:01PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS?
ANY QUESTIONS?
ANYONE IN CHAMBERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
11, FILE REZ 23-20?

MADAM CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE?
8:49:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
8:49:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
COUNCILMAN GUDES.
8:49:31PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
FILE REZ 23-20.
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF
5802 AND 5804 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND 103 WEST HENRY AVENUE
IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MOHR PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING CLASSIFICATION SH-CI
SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO SH-PD SEMINOLE
HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8:50:04PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
8:50:09PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
8:50:13PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
8:50:14PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
8:50:17PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.
8:50:18PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
(NO RESPONSE)

8:50:20PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
8:50:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
8:50:22PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK ABSTAIN, SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4th, 2023 AT
9:30 A.M.
8:50:33PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 13.
FILE SU-2-23-01.
8:50:45PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THE APPLICANT HERE IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A
RESTAURANT DRIVE-IN AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3603 WEST
HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
I WILL NOW PASS ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
8:51:04PM >>SAM THOMAS:
PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING
DISTRICT AND IT IS NOT WITHIN A CITY IDENTIFIED NEIGHBORHOOD
BUT IT IS ADJACENT TO THE PLAZA TERRACE.
HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR AND
TRANSIT SERVICE PROVIDED 35 FEET SOUTH OF THE SITE.
AL LOPEZ PARK IS THE CLOSEST RECREATIONAL FACILITY 200 FEET
SOUTH OF THE SITE AND IS WITHIN A COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND
EVACUATION ZONE C.
HERE IS THE SITE ON THE AERIAL MAP.
YOU CAN SEE IT IN PURPLE.
IT THE IT THE JUST TO THE EAST OF DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND

NORTH OF HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS COMMERCIAL ALONG HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE YOU CAN SEE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
AND THEN AS YOU TRANSITION OVER TO THE NORTH AND EAST, YOU
MOVE INTO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED.
HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, A LOT OF COLORS
GOING ON HERE, BUT THE SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE
COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
THIS RED COLOR IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION. THE BLUE COLOR IS THE PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC.
I BELIEVE THAT IS ST. LAWRENCE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL.
YOU HAVE AL LOPEZ PARK TO THE SOUTH.
THEN AROUND HERE WE SEE MARIA ANTOINETTE COURT, IDENTIFIED,
AS THE DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND THE
CITY OF TAMPA SO THESE LAND USES NORTH OF THERE, THESE ARE
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES WITHIN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SPECIAL USE 2 TO ALLOW THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE RETAIL, BUILDINGS
SHALL BE PLACED CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PARKING
FOR DEVELOPMENT AS IS THE CASE WITH THIS PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT.
THE PROPOSAL ALSO PROVIDES INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
WITHIN THE SITE TO ENSURE PEDESTRIANS CAN SAFELY AND
ACCESSIBLY ACCESS AMENITIES WITHIN THE SITE TO CONNECT WITH
THE STORE'S ENTRANCE TO THE SIDEWALK ON WEST HILLSBOROUGH

AVENUE WHICH IS SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING, TREES
ALONG THE SIDEWALK TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND
STREET EDGE.
THE DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW IS ORIENTED INTERNALLY AND NOT
TOWARDS THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MEETING THE POLICY 4.3.4.
IN CONCLUSION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST
CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
8:54:00PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
THANK YOU.
8:54:02PM >>ZAIN HUSAIN:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WILL FIRST GO AHEAD AND SHOW THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE
PROPERTY.
AS YOU SEE THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
TO THE WEST HERE YOU HAVE A SERVICE STATION.
I WILL SHOW YOU A PICTURE TO COME.
TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE A RESTAURANT, I BELIEVE IT'S A
WENDY'S, AS I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES TO COME.
TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE A SHOPPING CENTER THAT I WILL SHOW
YOU.
TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE AL LOPEZ PARK.
AND ALSO SAINT LAWRENCE CATHOLIC SCHOOL HERE TO THE SOUTH.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE 2 IS FOR A RESTAURANT DRIVE-IN.

THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 0.75 ACRES.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT AT THIS TIME.
THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE 540 SQUARE FEET, RIGHT HERE TO
THE SOUTH.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE COMES FROM THE SHOPPING CENTER
TO THE NORTH.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST REQUIRES 3 MARKING SPACES AND A TOTAL
OF 14 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS AT 20 FEET TALL.
I WILL NOW SHOW THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
AS YOU SEE, THE ELEVATION TO THE EAST.
THE ELEVATION TO THE WEST.
THE ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH.
AND ELEVATION TO THE NORTH.
AS I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES I WILL SHOW YOU
WHAT I SAW.
FIRST PICTURE I WILL SHOW YOU IS THE VACANT SITE.
SO I AM HERE. ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE HERE, YOU HAVE
THE VACANT SITE HERE, YOU WILL HAVE THAT WEST HILLSBOROUGH
AVENUE, AND AL LOPEZ PARK BEHIND THAT.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE WE'LL HAVE SHOPPING CENTERS
INCLUDING A WALMART.
ALSO PART OF THAT STRIP OF SHOPPING CENTERS, YOU WILL HAVE
RESTAURANTS, COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS.
TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU WILL HAVE THAT SERVICE STATION I

SPOKE OF.
ANOTHER VIEW, ACTUALLY RIGHT NOW STANDING INSIDE THE SERVICE
STATION LOOKING AT THE VACANT SITE.
ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE VACANT SITE YOU WILL HAVE THAT
RESTAURANT I WILL SHOW YOU.
AND THIS IS THAT SITE TO THE EAST, THE WENDY'S RESTAURANT.
I WILL SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN ONE MORE TIME.
AND THAT WILL EXPLAIN IT BETTER AS YOU SEE THE CARS COME IN.
WE HAVE THE RESTAURANT DRIVE-IN.
AND THEN WE WILL GO OUT.
THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FIND THE OVERALL REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE
APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE REVISION TO THE
REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
8:59:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
SEEING NONE, PETITIONER?
8:59:18PM >> MY NAME IS ERIC ALMOND, THE PRESIDENT OF ALMOND
ENGINEERING, 6277 DUPONT STATION COURT EAST, JACKSONVILLE
FLORIDA 32217.
GIVEN HOW LATE IT IS TONIGHT AND FOR THE SAKE OF BREVITY I
WILL KEEP MY COMMENTS BRIEF AND CONCISE.

AS ZAIN HAS DESCRIBED, 7 BREWS IS A NEW PLAYER TO THE COFFEE
SERVICE INDUSTRY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
THEY HAVE A PROJECTED 176 STORES I THINK THEY ARE TRYING TO
ADD TO THE FLORIDA MARKET, AND THIS IS THE FIRST ONE INSIDE
OF TAMPA.
THE REASON WE ARE HERE TONIGHT IS BECAUSE WE ARE IN THE
WESTSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND WE ARE REQUIRED TO GO
THROUGH THE SPECIAL USE APPLICATION PROCESS BECAUSE WE ARE A
RESTAURANT USE WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH COMPONENT.
AGAIN, HERE IS OUR SITE.
IT'S THREE QUARTERS OF AN ACRE.
ACCESS WILL BE INTERNAL THROUGH THE SHOPPING CENTER.
AND WE FEEL THAT OUR REQUEST FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
BE APPROVED, WE THINK THERE'S PRECEDENCE WITH THE WENDY'S
RESTAURANT USE AND THE DRIVE-THROUGH IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
OUR PROPOSED PROJECT.
THE SITE PLAN BEFORE YOU HAS BEEN EXTREMELY VETTED WITH ZAIN
AND HIS STAFF.
OUR ORIGINAL SITE PLAN THAT WE SUBMITTED BACK IN OCTOBER DID
NOT MEET THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR CITY OF TAMPA,
NOR THE OVERLAY DISTRICT.
IT WAS STRICTLY A CORPORATE HERE IS THE SITE PLAN, HERE IS
WHAT WE WANT DONE, SO THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF
COORDINATION BETWEEN ZAIN AND HIS GROUP WHICH WAS EXTREMELY
HELPFUL.

WE FINALLY GOT IT TO A SITE PLAN THAT MEETS THE OVERLAY
DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS THE TAMPA LDRs AS WELL AS
SOME ROOT CORPORATE, I GUESS, APPROVAL FOR THEIR OPERATIONAL
FACILITY AS FAR AS THE VEHICLES ENTERING AND EXITING THE
SITE.
ONE ITEM OF NOTE, WE ALSO DID A LOT OF COORDINATION WITH
D.O.T.
THIS SITE IS ENCUMBERED WITH A LEGAL AGREEMENT, AND THE
LEGAL AGREEMENT STATES THAT WHEN THE LAST OUTPARCEL OF THIS
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS DEVELOPED, THE APPLICANT IS THEN
GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL RIGHT TURN LANE INTO THE
EXISTING COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION -- I'M SORRY, COMMERCIAL
RETAIL CENTER, AND WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE SOME SAFETY
UPGRADES TO THE GEOMETRY OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE,
AND THAT'S SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE OF CONCERNS D.O.T. HAS WITH
PUBLIC SAFETY.
SO IN CONCLUSION, I REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE SU-2.
AND I'M DONE.
9:02:20PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER?
SEEING NONE IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK
TO AGENDA ITEM 12313, SU-2-23-01?
DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE, MADAM CLERK?
WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

ANY OPPOSED?
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
9:02:45PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
FILE NUMBER SU-2-23-01, ORDINANCE BEING
PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE
APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 APPROVING A RESTAURANT,
DRIVE-IN, IN A CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT IN THE
GENERAL VICINITY OF 3603 WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 HEREOF PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9:03:13PM >> SECOND.
THE PROPOSED USE IS CONSISTENT WITH CMU-35 LAND USE
DESIGNATION WHICH ALLOWS CONSIDERATION OF RETAIL, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL USES, SERVICE, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES.
THE USE IS LOCATED WITH A CG ZONING DISTRICT, DOES NOT
REQUEST ANY WAIVERS AND MEETS THE GENERAL STANDARDS IN
SECTION 27-129.
9:03:46PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
THANK YOU.
WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE.
9:03:56PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
YES.
9:04:00PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES.

9:04:01PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
YES.
9:04:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES.
9:04:04PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES.
9:04:05PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES.
9:04:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
YES.
9:04:07PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 4th,
2023 AT 9:30 A.M.
9:04:15PM >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
9:04:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
INFORMATION REPORTS.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
9:04:20PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YES, PLEASE, A FEW QUICK ONES HOPEFULLY.
YOU MAY KNOW, STOP ME IF ANYONE DID THIS ALREADY, BUT MARIO
NUNEZ'S PARENTS ARE HAVING THEIR 75TH WEDDING ANNIVERSARY SO
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR A COMMENDATION PRESENTED
OFF-SITE TO PRESENT CARMEN AND PHIL ON THEIR 75TH
ANNIVERSARY. IF ONE OF YOU IS GOING YOU CAN TAKE IT.
I THINK WE SHOULD DO A MOTION.
9:04:52PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
WHAT IS THIS?
9:05:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK IT'S THE TARPON GAME OR SOMETHING
LIKE THAT.
IF YOU ARE GOING YOU CAN GIVE IT TO THEM.
75 YEARS IS A LONG TIME FOR A WEDDING ANNIVERSARY.
9:05:10PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
9:05:13PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIED.
9:05:19PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SECOND ONE IS MOTION FOR COMMENDATION TO BE
PRESENTED OFF-SITE TO KELLY FLANNERY FOR TEN YEARS OF
LEADERSHIP AT THE SOUTH TAMPA CHAMBER.
9:05:28PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
MOTION CARRIES.
9:05:34PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE NEXT THREE, JUST GET REPORTS FROM
STAFF.
I WAS TOLD THAT INDIAN ROCKS -- ONE OF THE BIG ISSUES
ESPECIALLY IN SOUTH TAMPA IS AIRBNB AND STATE LIMITS WHAT WE
CAN DO.
I UNDERSTAND INDIAN ROCKS BEACH JUST PASSED SOME REGULATIONS
AND I WOULD LIKE TO GET AN UPDATE FROM STAFF ABOUT WHAT WE
CAN DO, FOR EXAMPLE, LIMITING NOISE AFTER 10:00, THINGS LIKE
THAT.
SO MOTION TO ASK CITY STAFF TO REPORT BACK AT THE AUGUST
31st WORKSHOP FOR DISCUSSION ON THE INDIAN ROCKS BEACH
REGULATIONS AND HOW THEIR REGULATIONS FOR SHORT-TERM
RENTALS.
9:06:11PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
9:06:12PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECONDED

BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:06:19PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WE TALKED SEVERAL TIMES ABOUT HOW WE
DOUBLED THE FINES FOR LEAF BLOWING INTO THE GUTTERS LIKE
THREE YEARS AGO BUT PEOPLE ARE DOING IT SO I WOULD LIKE TO
MOTION TO ASK CITY STAFF TO REPORT BACK ON AUGUST 3rd
DURING STAFF REPORTS AS TO HOW MANY FINES HAVE BEEN ISSUED
FOR BLOWING LEAVES INTO THE STREETS AND GUTTERS AND WHAT WE
CAN DO TO ENDORSE THIS ORDINANCE.
9:06:40PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
9:06:41PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:06:45PM >>BILL CARLSON:
PROBABLY A LOT OF YOU HEARD ABOUT SENATE
BILL 102.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, IT GOES INTO EFFECT JULY
1st, TO ASK CITY STAFF TO PRESENT DURING THE JULY 13
STAFF REPORTS AS TO THE IMPACT OF SENATE BILL 102 IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA.
IT'S THE ONE THAT DEALS WITH HOUSING, THE HOUSING
REGULATIONS.
9:07:07PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.

ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:07:14PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THAT'S IT.
THANK YOU.
9:07:15PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
9:07:18PM >>LUIS VIERA:
REALLY QUICK, SOME RETROACTIVE ONES.
I GAVE -- I KNOW THE OFFICE OF COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND
COUNCILMAN CARLSON WERE THERE FOR THIS, TOO, ROY CALWOOD, A
TAMPA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION, 100-YEAR-OLD BUFFALO
SOLDIER FROM 92ND REGIMEN.
9:07:37PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
9:07:41PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I ALSO GAVE A COMMENDATION TO HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION MILITARY VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
FOR THE TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY.
9:07:49PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:07:54PM >>CHAIRMAN:
SUNDAY, I THINK IT IS OFF-SITE I WILL BE GIVING
A COMMENDATION TO OUR FRIEND AT THE PENGUIN PROJECT, ALL
DISABILITIES.
9:08:03PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:08:09PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I AM BUYING STOCK IN COMMENDATIONS.
AND THEN I MOTION FOR MAY 25th, IF I MAY, FOR WE ALWAYS
DO A MEMORIAL DAY PRESENTATION AND INVITE GOLD STAR FAMILIES
IF I MAY THAT DAY TO CITY COUNCIL.
9:08:23PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:08:28PM >>LUIS VIERA:
LASTLY IF I MAY, I HAD -- AND THIS COUNCIL
PASSED, YOU ALL KNOW OUR FRIEND KAREN CLAYTON, SUCH A
WONDERFUL WOMAN, AND HER LATE SON MIKE PHILLIPS WHO PASSED
ON THREE YEARS AGO, I BELIEVE, YEAH, THREE YEARS AGO IT WAS,
AND WE HAD SUPPORTED DOING AN HONORARY STREET RENAMING AFTER
MIKE PHILLIPS, AND STAFF APPEARS TO BE AMENABLE TO IT.
OBVIOUSLY WE WERE PREVIOUSLY AMENABLE TO IT BUT THEY
REQUESTED THAT I DO IT AGAIN AND SET IT FOR A TIME CERTAIN
ON JUNE 15th AT 2023.
9:08:58PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
9:09:04PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
9:09:06PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION CARRIES.

COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
9:09:11PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HAVE A FEW MOTIONS.
THE FIRST ONE, A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
REMOVE TA/CPA 23-03 FROM THE MAY 25, 2023, 5:01PM FROM THE
PUBLIC ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING.
9:09:25PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:09:30PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THE SECOND IS ANOTHER REQUEST BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO REMOVE TA/CPA 23-06 FROM THE MAY 25
2023 5:01 TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC HEARING.
9:09:39PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:09:45PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AND THEN A REQUEST BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO REMOVE TA/CPA 23-06 FROM THE AUGUST 31st,
2023 5:01 P.M. ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING.
9:09:56PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIED.
9:10:04PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AND I WOULD LIKE TO WISH MY FATHER A

VERY HAPPY BIRTHDAY, WHICH IS TOMORROW.
64 YEARS OLD.
AND TODAY WOULD HAVE BEEN MY GRANDMOTHER'S 96th
BIRTHDAY, SO I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, TOO.
THAT'S IT.
9:10:18PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK.
9:10:20PM >>LYNN HURTAK:
NOTHING.
9:10:21PM >>ORLANDO GUDES:
YES, MR. CHAIRMAN.
Fraternity Kappa Alpha Psi WILL BE HERE IN TAMPA, IT WILL BE THE FIRST
NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE ORGANIZATION IN THE CITY OF
TAMPA.
IT WILL BE CALLED THE KONCLAVE ON THE BAY, WITH A K,
CAPITAL.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR A COMMENDATION FOR THE
GRAND CHAPTER MEETING IN THE CITY OF TAMPA THAT WILL BE
GIVEN OFF-SITE.
9:10:53PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
9:11:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
YES, SIR, MR. MANISCALCO.
YOUR FATHER HAS A BIRTHDAY WITH ONE OF MY FRIENDS, BORN ON
THE SAME DAY.

HIS NAME IS PETE ROSE.
HE TURNS 82.
9:11:13PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HEARD THAT NAME.
[ LAUGHTER ]
9:11:23PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I'M GOING TO CALL HIM TOMORROW.
9:11:25PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THAT'S GREAT.
9:11:27PM >> HE DESERVES IT.
9:11:29PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I BELIEVE EARLY IN THE DAY, MADE A
STATEMENT I WAS GOING TO ASK THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO MAKE
A SIGNIFICANT EFFORT TO FIND OUT DISTRICT 4, 5, 6 AND 7 TO
GET THE MONEYS WE APPROPRIATED AND FUNDED CERTAIN AREAS,
WHATEVER IT IS, IF THEY CAN, WITHIN TWO WEEKS OR THREE
WEEKS, WHATEVER TIME THEY NEED TO PUT THOSE NUMBERS TOGETHER
SO AT LEAST WE HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT'S GOING ON.
9:11:58PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
AT THE CRA MEETING OR SOONER THAN THAT?
9:12:02PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I JUST WANT IF WE CAN DISTRIBUTE IT AND
HAVE A MEETING ON IT.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE.
9:12:13PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SECOND.
9:12:14PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
9:12:19PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THAT'S IT.

9:12:21PM >>JOSEPH CITRO:
I HEAR NO OBJECTION?
MOVED TO RECEIVE AND FILE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECONDED
BY COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED?
MOTION CARRIES.
WE ARE ADJOURNED.
[MEETING ADJOURNED]


DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.