📝 City Council Meeting Transcript

TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 2026, 5:01 P.M.

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.

[GAVEL SOUNDING]
05:05:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING OF TAMPA CITY
COUNCIL TO ORDER.
CLERK, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
05:06:01PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
HERE.
05:06:02PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
HERE.
05:06:04PM >>LUIS VIERA:
HERE.
05:06:05PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
05:06:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HERE.
05:06:07PM >>CLERK:
YOU HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
05:06:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK WILL NOT BE JOINING US
BECAUSE SHE WAS NOT FEELING WELL.
FYI.
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG WILL BE HERE SHORTLY.
LACHONE, DO YOU WANT TO CLEAR THE AGENDA.
05:06:25PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THREE ITEMS TO CLEAR ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA.
ITEM NUMBER 9, REZ 26-22.
THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
IT WILL NOT BE HEARD.
THIS CASE IS WITHDRAWN.
05:06:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE HAVE A MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITEM NUMBER 9.
A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED.
AYES HAVE IT.
05:06:48PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
NEXT ITEM, CHAIRMAN, IS ITEM NUMBER 10,
WHICH IS FILE NUMBER REZ 26-12.
THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
THIS IS A MISNOTICE.
05:06:59PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER
MIRANDA.
A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO TO REMOVE ITEM 10
FOR THE MISNOTICE.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
05:07:10PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LAST ITEM TO CLEAR IS ITEM 11, REZ 26-43.
THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
A MISNOTICE.
05:07:20PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA TO REMOVE ITEM 11 FOR
MISNOTICE.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED.
IS THAT ALL?
05:07:30PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THAT COMPLETES IT.
05:07:31PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA AND SECONDED FROM COUNCIL
MEMBER MANISCALCO TO MOVE THE AGENDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
ITEM NUMBER ONE.
OH, I AM SORRY.
MOVE TO OPEN ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER
MANISCALCO.
SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
ITEM NUMBER ONE.
HELLO, MR. SHELBY.
05:07:55PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
GOOD EVENING.
05:07:56PM >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
I HAVE A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
05:08:01PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
05:08:03PM >> HOPEFULLY.
05:08:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CCTV, SHE HAS A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
ITEM NUMBER ONE.
DO YOU HAVE IT?
05:08:28PM >> IT WAS TRANSMITTED A WEEK AGO.
05:08:30PM >> OKAY, GIVE ME A SECOND.
05:08:35PM >> IF NOT, I CAN OLD SCHOOL IT IF I NEED TO.
05:08:39PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU CAN USE THE WOLF AND PUT IT ON THERE.
LAY IT ON THE GLASS AND WE WILL SEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
PERFECT.
RIGHT THERE.
OKAY.
05:08:46PM >> WE WILL TRY THAT.
THIS SHOULD BE SHORT AND SWEET.
SO I AM BRIA DIXON, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
I'M HERE TO TALK TONIGHT ABOUT THE ESG RUSH FUNDING
SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO OUR ANNUAL ACTION PLAN.
SOME OF THE THINGS WE WILL DISCUSS TODAY, THE BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE, ELIGIBLE USES OF THE FUNDING, THE OBJECTIVES,
OUTCOMES AND THE NEXT STEPS IN THIS PROCESS.
SO IN 2023, THE CITY OF TAMPA RECEIVED A SPECIAL ALLOCATION
OF ESG RAPID UNSHELTERED SURVIVOR HOUSING OR ESG RUSH.
ABOUT $800,000.
THIS FUNDING WAS INTENDED TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR
HOMELESS, SPECIAL NEEDS, AND SPECIAL SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR
THOSE COMMUNITIES THAT WERE AFFECTED BY HURRICANES AND IN
INSTANCE IT WAS HURRICANE IAN.
2025, THE CITY RECEIVED A SECOND ALLOCATION OF $1 MILLION TO
SUPPORT, AGAIN, HOMELESS SERVICES FOR THE HELENE AND MILTON
HURRICANES.
THOSE ONES HAVE BEEN EXPENDED OR NEARLY EXPENDED.
SO APRIL 2026, WE WERE AWARDED AN ADDITIONAL $1,066,228 OF
THIS MONEY OF THIS FUNDING.
SO THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PLAN FOR ITS
ALLOCATION, PRESENT THE PLAN TO THE PUBLIC, RECEIVE ANY
PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND THEN ASK FOR APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION TO
HUD.
SO SIMILAR TO OUR REGULAR ESG, ELIGIBLE USES ARE EMERGENCY
SHELTER OPERATIONS, RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR RAPID
REHOUSING, AND HOMELESS PREVENTION ACTIVITIES, OUTREACH AND
OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT EXIST OF THOSE HOMELESS OR AT RISK OF
BEING HOMELESS.
AGAIN, THEY TARGET HOMELESSNESS OR THOSE THAT AREN'T ABLE TO
ACCESS FUNDING PROVIDED BY OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS SUCH AS FEMA.
THE CITY'S INTENTION IS TO WORK WITH OUR CURRENT PARTNERS
THAT WE ARE FUNDING UNDER EXISTING AGREEMENTS TO INCREASE
THEIR ALL CASES TO STREAMLINE THE PROGRAMS AND GET TO NEW --
TO THE PROGRAM AND SERVICES.
SORRY, I'M CROOKED.
THERE WE GO.
FOR THE PROGRAMS THAT ARE OUTCOMES, THESE ARE OUR WEEKEND
FUND EMERGENCY SHELTERS.
WE ANTICIPATE SERVING 400 PERSONS.
RENTAL ASSISTANCE FOR RAPID REHOUSING, 50 HOUSEHOLDS.
AND HOMELESS PREVENTION SERVICES IN THE FORM OF RENTAL OR
UTILITY ASSISTANCE APPROXIMATELY 100 PERSONS.
WE HAVE SOME PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION.
OUR ANTICIPATED BUDGET OUT OF THE $1,066,228, 7.5% IS OUR
ALLOCATED ADMINISTRATION COST, RAPID REHOUSING APPROXIMATELY
400,000.
HOMELESS PREVENTION, APPROXIMATELY $191,000.
AND STREET OUTREACH AND OTHER SERVICES, $394,000.
SO, AGAIN, TOTAL $1,066,228.
THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WE ARE REQUIRED TO UPDATE OUR EXISTING
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, WHICH IS THE CURRENT YEAR THAT WE ARE IN
BEEN 60 DAYS OF AWARD WHICH IS JUNE 16, 2026 TO BE SUBMITTED
TO HUD.
WE HAVE A FIVE-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WHICH STARTED JUNE
5 AND ENDS AT THE END OF THE DAY TODAY FOR ANY PUBLIC
COMMENT.
NO MATCH REQUIREMENT AND FUND NEEDS TO BE EXPENDED IN 24
MONTHS APPROXIMATELY JULY OF 2028.
THIS IS OUR CALENDAR AND NEXT STEPS.
AGAIN, WE ARE HERE AT OUR PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 11.
WE ARE REQUIRED FOR ONE PUBLIC HEARING IN THE EVENING.
AGAIN, OUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ENDS TODAY AS WELL.
OUR DEADLINE TO BE SUBMITTED IS TUESDAY, JUNE 16.
AND FUNDS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE ONCE THEY APPROVE THE PLAN
AROUND JULY.
AT THIS TIME, WE CAN ACCEPT ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS.
05:13:11PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS WITH THE
PRESENTATION?
HEARING NONE.
ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO ITEM NUMBER 1?
NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO ITEM NUMBER 1.
05:13:25PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CLOSE.
05:13:26PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
SECOND.
05:13:27PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE
RESOLUTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER
MIRANDA.
SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
05:13:36PM >> THANK YOU.
IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, WE HAVE THE INFORMATION TO
SUBMIT ANY --
05:13:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SCOOTCH THAT UP FOR THOSE WATCHING AT
HOME.
THERE WE GO.
05:13:49PM >> ONE MORE TIME.
05:13:51PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THERE YOU GO.
05:13:52PM >> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL OR CALL OUR
OFFICE.
05:13:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.
HAVE A WONDERFUL EVENING.
THANK YOU.
OKAY.
ON TO PUBLIC HEARINGS.
REST OF THE PROCEEDINGS TONIGHT ARE QUASI JUDICIAL.
IF YOU WERE PLANNING TO SPEAK OR TESTIFY IN ANY ONE OF THESE
HEARINGS, I NEED FOR YOU TO STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND
BE SWORN IN BY OUR CLERK.
[SWEARING IN]
05:14:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
ON TO ITEM 2.
05:14:29PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU SO MUCH, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
IF I MAY, COUNCIL, TAKE A MOMENT TO INTRODUCE A NEW STAFF
MEMBER.
I HAVE JOE CERMAK.
I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE HIM.
HE'S OUR FORESTER EXAMINER, AND HE WILL WORK IN DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION IN DOING THE NATURAL RESOURCE REVIEW.
HE WAS IN OUR -- IN THE CITY OF TAMPA'S PERMITTING
DEPARTMENT, AND HE HAS MOVED OVER TO REVIEW OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING PROGRAM PROCESSES.
SO WE ARE GLAD TO HAVE HIM ON OUR TEAM.
HE EARNED HIS BACHELOR'S DEGREE FROM IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY,
INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES WITH THREE CORE STUDY AREAS BEING
COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.
HE IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY NATURAL RESOURCE QUESTIONS THAT YOU
MAY HAVE.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING -- IT IS JOE CERMAK.
05:15:27PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
JOE, NICE TO MEET YOU.
WE APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE.
05:15:35PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
ITEM NUMBER 2 IS FILE NO. REZ-26-07.
THIS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 301 EAST OSBORNE AVENUE.
REZONE FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT FOR THE USE OF DAY CARE AND NURSERY FACILITY.
WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO EMILY FROM THE PLANNING
COMMISSION, AND I WILL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT.
05:15:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
GOOD EVENING, EMILY.
05:16:01PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
GOOD EVENING.
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANS DISTRICT, EAST
TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, EASTERN HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD, AND
EVACUATION ZONE E.
THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE HERE OUTLINED IN
PURPLE.
SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
HOMES AND COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY USES ARE FURTHER TO THE
WEST ALONG -- CONCENTRATE ALONG NORTH 40th STREET.
THERE ARE SOME SCATTERED PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC AND
EDUCATIONAL USES IN THE AREA AS WELL.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE AGAIN, OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT IS REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION THAT
DOES SURROUND THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND FURTHER TO THE WEST WHERE THOSE COMMERCIAL USES ARE
ALONG 40th STREET IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35
DESIGNATION.
THE EXISTING DAY CARE IS ON-SITE AND THE REQUEST IS TO ADD
1600 SQUARE FEET FOR A TOTAL F.A.R. OF .24.
THIS IS BELOW THE MAXIMUM .35 UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10
DESIGNATION.
DAY CARES CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE R-10 DESIGNATION.
SITE WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE AND EAST TAMPA
OVERLAY, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT OF A
PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED ENVIRONMENT, PROMOTES COMPATIBILITY WITH
SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND COHESIVE MIXED USE OF ADHERING
TO THE OVERLAY STANDARDS.
EXISTING CARE HAS OPERATED WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR
SEVERAL YEARS AND SERVES THE NEIGHBORHOOD; HOWEVER, THE
PROPOSED EXPANSION INTENSIFIES A NONRESIDENTIAL USE WITHIN
AN AREA PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY.
THE REQUEST INCREASES THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN SERVED BUT ONLY
FIVE PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE, POTENTIALLY FURTHER
CONTRIBUTING TO A PARKING SPILLOVER, QUEUE OVER AND DROP-OFF
ACTIVITY ON TO RESIDENTIAL STREETS.
THESE CONDITIONS MAY LIMIT SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
AREAS AND CREATE ADDITIONAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN VEHICLES AND
PEDESTRIANS.
PLANNING COMMISSION'S ANALYSIS IS BASED ON THE SITE PLAN
UPLOADED ON MARCH 26.
A WAIVER TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 10-FOOT USE-TO-USE BUFFER TO
ZERO FEET AND FIVE FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY IS
NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE AN EXISTING PLAYGROUND.
CITY STAFF NOTED THAT WAIVERS FOR PARKING, VEHICULAR USE
AREA BUFFERS AND STAFF AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS WERE
INCONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND
SECTIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
AS PROPOSED, SITE LACKS A TRANSITION BETWEEN THE
NONRESIDENTIAL DAY CARE USE AND SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTIES.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS AWARE THAT THE CITY STAFF
REPORT HAS BEEN MODIFIED, AND THE APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED
SOME OF THE ORIGINAL WAIVERS LISTED ON THE SITE PLAN.
IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
IT WOULD INTENSIFY A NONRESIDENTIAL USE WITHIN A
PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA AND DOES NOT
ADEQUATELY MITIGATE IMPACTS RELATED TO COMPATIBILITY,
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION POLICIES.
AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:19:11PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE.
05:19:13PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, AGAIN, COUNCIL, LaCHONE DOCK,
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AND I WILL PLACE AN AERIAL UP OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
SO THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING DAY
CARE FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY.
SO I WILL SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN MOMENTARILY TO SHOW YOU THE
ADDITION, THE LOCATION OF THE ADDITION.
THE SITE ITSELF, THE LOT, HAS 100 FEET OF WIDTH AND THE
DEPTH IS 135 FEET.
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED WITH THIS REQUEST IS 35
FEET.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED.
THIS IS OSBORNE AVENUE.
AND JUST FOR ORIENTATION, THIS IS 40th STREET.
AND THIS IS 42nd STREET.
YOU CAN SEE THE RS-50 ZONING SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY.
AS YOU HEAD FURTHER WEST, YOU HAVE THE CI ZONING THAT IS
PREDOMINANT ON 40th STREET.
AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, YOU HAVE A
COUPLE OF PD REZONINGS.
THESE ARE OLDER REZONINGS, AND THEY ARE FOR PLACE OF
RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
BOTH OF THOSE PDs.
ONE IS FOR 2014 AND ONE IS FOR 2019.
AND I HAVE THE SITE PLAN THAT IS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.
SO THIS IS OSBORNE AVENUE, AND THIS IS 42nd STREET.
THE SUBJECT -- THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY.
THIS IS THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT IS ON THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING.
IT CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 1600 SQUARE FEET.
YOU WOULD ENTER THE SITE HERE ON 42nd STREET AND EXIT THE
SITE ON OSBORNE WITH THE ONE-WAY TRAVEL THERE.
THERE ARE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION PROVIDED WITH WALKWAYS FROM
EACH POINT OF ENTRY TO SIDEWALKS OR EITHER WALKWAYS
INTERNALLY ON THE SITE.
WHAT WAS REFERENCED IS AT THE TIME THE STAFF REPORT WAS
INITIALLY DRAFTED WITH PLANNING COMMISSION, URBAN DESIGN
COMMENTS WERE NOT UPDATED.
URBAN DESIGN COMMENTS WERE UPDATED.
THE SITE IS IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY.
THEY ARE ALLOWED PARKING OFFSETS.
THOSE PARKING OFFSETS ADJUST THEIR REQUIRED PARKING.
REQUIRED PARKING IS FIVE SPACES.
THEY ARE PROVIDING FIVE SPACES.
THEY DO NOT NEED A TRANSPORTATION WAIVER, AND THEY DO NOT
NEED A WAIVER TO THE OVERLAY.
THEY ARE MEETING THE STANDARDS.
ONE INCONSISTENCY THAT REMAINS ON THE SITE IS RELATED TO THE
TREES.
SO TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY, YOU HAVE A TREE THAT IS LOCATED HERE.
AND THAT IS MARKED FOR REMOVAL.
THAT IS A TREE THAT IS RATED B-7.
AND THIS WAS THE AREA OF CONCERN FOR NATURAL RESOURCES.
A TREE IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE NEAR THE CENTER THAT WILL
BE REMOVED.
BUT THERE WAS NOT AN OBJECTION TO THAT REMOVAL, JUST GIVEN
ITS PROXIMITY TO THE SITE IN THE NEW BUILDING.
THAT IS ONE REMAINING INCONSISTENT ON THE SITE.
AND I HAVE THE AERIALS.
SO THE EXISTING BUILDING -- I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE
EXISTING BUILDING.
LET ME ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT.
SO THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THAT MODULAR --
THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION.
THIS IS THE SOUTH.
AND THEN THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION.
AND THEN I HAVE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE NEW BUILDING.
AND SO THIS WILL BE THE NORTH ELEVATION.
THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
THIS IS THE EAST, AND THEN THIS IS THE WEST.
AND THEN I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE.
SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY ON 42nd.
THAT'S IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE SITE, LOOKING EAST.
A BETTER VIEW OF THE PROPERTY ENTERING THE SITE, THIS IS THE
DRIVE FOR THE ENTRY.
PARKING EXISTS ON THE SITE TODAY.
THAT WAS THROUGH THE 2001 APPROVAL WHICH THEY CURRENTLY HAVE
FOR SPECIAL USE FOR A DAY CARE.
THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE.
THIS IS THE WEST END OF THE PROPERTY.
LOCATION OF THE NEW STRUCTURE.
THIS IS WEST OF THE PROPERTY, ACROSS THE STREET.
THIS IS NORTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE.
AND THEN THIS IS SOUTH.
THERE WERE A TOTAL -- THERE IS A TOTAL OF TWO WAIVERS THAT
ARE REQUESTED ON THIS SITE.
ONE IS TO REDUCE THE EIGHT-FOOT V.U.A. ALONG THE NORTH TO ZERO
AND ALONG THE SOUTH TO FIVE FEET.
THERE IS A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM 15
FEET AND A SIX-FOOT MASONRY WALL TO FIVE FEET WITH A
SIX-FOOT PVC FENCE ON THE SOUTH AND ZERO TO THE EAST FOR THE
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT.
AND THE APPLICANT CAN TALK MORE ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE
GOING TO PROVIDE THE TEN FEET.
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IS ON THE SITE, BUT IT IS NOT CONSIDERED AS
OPEN LANDSCAPE AREA.
SO THEY'RE AGREEING TO PROVIDE THAT TEN FEET AND PUT THAT ON
THE SITE PLAN IN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
SECOND WAIVER IS THE 27-284.2.5 AND REQUEST TO REMOVE
NONHAZARDOUS GRAND LAUREL OAKS AND ONES I SHOWED ON THE SITE
PLAN.
ONE IS TREE NUMBER 6, 34-INCH, RATED C-7.
AND WITH THAT, STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT, AND THAT
IS DUE TO THE FINDING OF NATURAL RESOURCES ON THE SITE.
THEIR SITE PLAN CHANGE TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING SHOULD COUNCIL APPROVE THE REQUEST.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
05:25:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES COUNCIL HAVE QUESTIONS?
I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE PARKING.
05:25:07PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
SURE.
05:25:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU ARE DOUBLING THE AMOUNT OF STUDENTS.
THEY HAVE FIVE SPOTS.
BUT DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PARKING.
05:25:16PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
SO THE PARKING ITSELF IS BASED ON EMPLOYEES.
SO THAT WOULD BE THE BREAKOUT OF THE PARKING.
05:25:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HOW MANY EMPLOYEES?
05:25:29PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
I BELIEVE THEY HAVE ALLOTTED FOR ONE
EMPLOYEE -- WELL, I THINK THERE ARE EIGHT.
IF THIS WOULD ZOOM IN, IF IT FOCUSES IN.
05:25:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MAYBE CCTV COULD HELP YOU WITH THE FOCUS.
05:25:47PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
I THINK THERE ARE EIGHT.
05:25:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
FIVE SPOTS AND EIGHT EMPLOYEES.
05:25:52PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
EIGHT EMPLOYEES.
.05 PER EMPLOYEE IS REQUIRED.
05:25:59PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
INTERESTING.
AND NO PARKING SPOTS FOR THE USE ITSELF?
05:26:07PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
NO, THAT AND ANY VEHICLES THEY MAY HAVE.
IF A DAY CARE FACILITY HAD A VAN OR PICK-UP VAN THEY UTILIZE
FOR THE KIDS, THAT WOULD COUNT ALSO TOWARD PARKING BUT NOT
FOR GUESTS BECAUSE THE OCCUPANTS OF THE DAY CARE ARE
TYPICALLY KIDS OR, YOU KNOW, THE AGE GROUP.
05:26:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THEY DON'T PARACHUTE IN.
[LAUGHTER]
05:26:28PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
I THINK THE THOUGHT IS THAT ADULTS DROP THEM
OFF AND THEN PICK THEM UP AND LEAVE.
MOMENTARILY, NOT THAT THEY --
05:26:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
A DROP-OFF AREA.
05:26:38PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THAT WILL BE THIS CIRCLE DRIVE AREA, WHICH
IS WHY THEY CREATED THIS WITH THE ONE-WAY ENTRY AND EXIT.
05:26:47PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
GOTCHA.
05:26:48PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THEY CAN PULL IN, DROP OFF AND LEAVE OUT AND
CONTROLS THE TRAFFIC WITH THE ONE WAY DIRECTIONAL VERSUS
HAVING TWO-WAY.
05:26:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
05:27:00PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
THE REMOVAL OF THE TREE, IS THERE A REASON
WHY?
CAN YOU PUT THE PLAN BACK UP SO I CAN SEE.
05:27:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HEY, SOUNDS LIKE JOE IS UP.
05:27:10PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
HIS DEBUT.
[LAUGHTER]
05:27:17PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
THE B-7.
05:27:19PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO SPEAK TO
THAT A LITTLE BIT, BUT I THINK THE THOUGHT IS THAT THEY MAY
ATTEMPT TO SAVE THIS TREE.
THE THOUGHT WAS TO TRY TO SAVE IT.
THE WAIVER IS THERE IN CASE THEY CAN NOT SAVE IT.
AS YOU KNOW WITH A PD, IF THEY DON'T REQUEST A WAIVER NOW,
THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO BE COME BACK AND GET IT AFTER.
IF THEY GO TO PERMITTING, THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO OBTAIN IT.
THROUGH SPEAKING WITH THEM, THROUGH THE APPLICANT AND THEIR
TEAM, THEY STATED LIKE THEY FELT LIKE THEY MAY BE ABLE TO
PAVE THAT AREA, ADD THAT ADDITIONAL PAVING AND STILL
MAINTAIN THE HEALTH OF THE TREE.
05:27:52PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
OKAY.
THANK YOU.
05:27:54PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
ABSOLUTELY.
YOU ARE WELCOME.
05:27:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANYTHING ELSE?
ALL RIGHT.
APPLICANT?
GOOD EVENING.
05:28:06PM >> WILLIAM HENRY.
I AM -- JUST BY WAY OF INTRODUCTION, I AM A FORMER CHAIRMAN OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, PROBABLY DURING THE TIME THAT
COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA WAS FIRST ELECTED.
SO I AM A BLAST FROM THE PAST.
BUT I'M HERE TO REPRESENT THE ARCHITECTURAL FIRM.
JENAE KING, THE APPLICANT, IS HERE TO SPEAK TO SOME OF THESE
TOPICS.
WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO SAVE THAT TREE.
WE HAVE -- YOU KNOW, TREE REQUIRES A TEN-FOOT GREEN AREA
RADIUS ON IT.
BY SLIDING THE BUILDINGS NORTH, WE LOSE THE PARKING SPACES.
WE CAN'T ACCOMMODATE THE PARKING.
SO THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE -- I KNOW WE HAD CONVERSATIONS
WITH LACHONE TRYING TO WORK IT OUT, BUT THERE IS AN
AGREEMENT IN PLACE WITH THE OWNER TO THE SOUTH TO REMOVE THE
TREE.
AND WE HAVE TO MAKE THAT REQUEST AND ASK FOR THAT WAIVER.
THERE WILL BE A PVC SIX-FOOT-HIGH FENCE TO BUFFER IT.
IF THERE IS ANY WAY POSSIBLE, WE WOULD DO IT, BUT WE CAN'T
BECAUSE WE LOSE THE PARKING.
STAFF DID MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF A COUPLE OF SITE PLANS.
UNFORTUNATELY, THOSE SITE PLANS DIDN'T REALLY WORK OUT WHERE
WE COULD MAKE THE PROGRAM WORK.
AS FAR AS THE OTHER WAIVERS ARE CONCERNED, AS FAR AS THE
OVERLAY DISTRICT IS CONCERNED, WE ARE IN CONFORMANCE.
WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO MAKE THE SITE AS WALKABLE AS POSSIBLE.
TRIP GENERATION IS MOSTLY IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
SO THE IMPACTS OF THE ROADS ARE MITIGATED.
WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY TO DO WORK IT
OUT.
WE ARE MITIGATING THE IMPACTS TO THE SOUTH, THE
SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, AND TO THE EAST, THE
SINGLE-FAMILY, SO THAT THE RELATIONSHIPS WITH THOSE TWO
NEIGHBORS ARE EXCELLENT.
JENAE HERE TO SPEAK TO THAT.
SHE IS THE APPLICANT.
AS FAR AS OF THE NUMBER OF STUDENT.
SHE WILL SPEAK TO THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND THE NUMBER OF
TEACHERS THEY HAVE THERE AND WHY THE PARKING FOR THE
STAFF MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY BE LOOKED
ONEROUS, BUT IT ISN'T, AND SHE WILL EXPLAIN WHY THAT IS.
AGAIN, IF IT WAS POSSIBLE TO SAVE THE TREE, WE WOULD DO IT.
WE ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT SIGNED IN PLACE TO REMOVE THE TREE AND
TO HAVE THE BUFFER BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES.
AND THERE IS AN EXCELLENT RELATIONSHIP TO THE NEIGHBOR TO
THE EAST.
WITH THAT SAID, I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE JENAE, AND SHE
WILL TALK TO THE OPERATION AND WHY WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING
WE CAN TO MITIGATE THE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THANK YOU.
05:30:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
GOOD EVENING.
START WITH YOUR NAME.
05:30:50PM >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS JANAE KING.
THE APPLICATION IN QUESTION, IT WILL INCREASE THE CAPACITY
TO 26 KIDS.
I DID SPEAK TO BOTH NEIGHBORS.
THEY ARE FROM THE OPPOSITION OF DAY CARE, PER SE.
ONE NEIGHBOR DID SIGN THE WAIVER FOR THE TREE.
I INFORMED HIM I WOULD PUT THE FENCE UP.
PROBABLY IS IMPORTANT TO ME BECAUSE WE SERVE CHILDREN
THAT HAVE UNIQUE ABILITIES.
THERE ARE A LOT OF CENTERS IN THE AREA THAT WON'T ACCEPT
THOSE KIDS, SO WE PUT OURSELVES IN A POSITION WHERE WE ARE
ACCEPTING KIDS THAT PARENTS DON'T HAVE OTHER PLACES TO PUT
THEM.
WE HAVE BEEN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR YEARS.
WE HAD A CENTER AROUND THE CORNER THAT WE HAVE CLOSED.
AND WE HAVE A LOT OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
WE DO A LOT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
AND SO I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SEE THIS APPROVED, IF AT ALL
POSSIBLE, SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO SERVE THE CHILDREN IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
A LOT OF OUR STAFF WALK TO WORK, SO IT SERVES THEM AND THEIR
KIDS.
THE PARENT, THEY ARE ABLE TO WALK TO WORK AND BRING THEIR
KIDS.
THEY DON'T HAVE TRANSPORTATION THAT WOULD OTHERWISE ALLOW
THEM TO BRING THEIR KID TO DAY CARE.
SO IT PLAYS A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN OUR COMMUNITY.
05:31:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
OKAY.
DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION?
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT?
05:32:04PM >> CAN I ALLOW MILES FISHER TO SPEAK ON MY BEHALF?
05:32:09PM >> ABSOLUTELY.
05:32:09PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU STILL HAVE TIME.
05:32:10PM >> MILES FISHER WITH RGA DESIGN ARCHITECTS.
MANAGER OF DESIGN OPERATIONS THERE.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO PULL UP THE POWERPOINT
THAT WE DID.
IF NOT --
05:32:20PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IF YOU SUBMIT IT.
05:32:22PM >> WE DID.
05:32:23PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CCTV HAVE A POWERPOINT FOR THIS
PRESENTATION?
THERE WE GO.
05:32:28PM >> YEAH, THAT'S IT.
SO I JUST THOUGHT I WOULD PULL THIS UP AND SHOW YOU THE
EFFORT THAT WE HAVE MADE.
OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH MEETINGS WITH THE DRC AND
EVERYTHING TO TRY TO ACCOMMODATE THE OVERLAY DISTRICT,
ACCOMMODATE THE TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS AND EMBELLISHMENT
REQUIREMENTS AND EVERYTHING.
WE BROUGHT THE BUILDING CLOSER TO THE ROAD TO ACCOMMODATE
FOR THAT WHOLE WALKABILITY, THE GOAL OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE ARE INCLUDING A BIKE RACK AS WELL.
THAT SHOULD HELP.
BENCHES AND SHADE AREAS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE WALKING IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
I MAY BE BIASED, BUT OBVIOUSLY, IT IS AN ATTRACTIVE-LOOKING
BUILDING WE ARE PUTTING ON THE FRONT OF THE STREET.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE ARE JUST MAKING AN ATTEMPT TO, YOU KNOW,
HELP IMPROVE THE COMMUNITY.
SO THAT'S ALL.
05:33:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION, THE APPLICANT?
05:33:23PM >> YES, SIR.
05:33:24PM >> JENAE MIGHT TALK TO THIS.
TRAFFIC OBSERVED --
05:33:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COME ALL THE WAY UP.
START WITH YOUR NAME AGAIN.
05:33:32PM >> MY NAME IS WILLIAM HENRY.
THE TRAFFIC THAT WAS PERCEIVED THAT WAS ON THE SITE AT THE
TIME THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF MEMBER WHO WAS THERE IS
NOT GENERATED BY THIS USE.
THERE'S AN ADJOINING RESTAURANT ACROSS THE STREET.
SO JENAE MAY WANT TO SAY SHE ACCOMMODATED THAT USE.
BUT THE TRAFFIC -- EXCUSE ME, THE PARKING IS ACTUALLY NOT
PARKING FOR HER STAFF OR ANY OF OTHER USES ON THAT SITE.
05:34:02PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
05:34:04PM >> THANK YOU.
05:34:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION?
05:34:08PM >> YES.
05:34:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE.
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
COME ON UP.
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM, STAND AND STAND AGAINST
THE WALL, AND I WILL CALL YOU ONE AT A TIME.
COME TO THE PODIUM.
THE MICROPHONE IS EMBEDDED IN THE PODIUM.
START WITH YOUR NAME, AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
05:34:31PM >> OKAY.
MY NAME IS BIWANEMBI, AND I AM EXCITED TO TALK OF KIDS IN
PLAY DAY CARE BECAUSE THEY TRULY DID HAVE AN IMPACT ON MY
FAMILY.
MY DAUGHTER IS SIX YEARS OLD AND CURRENTLY OUT OF SCHOOL FOR
THE SUMMER AND HAS BEEN SUPER EXCITED OF SUMMER CAMP AT THE
DAY CARE.
THEY HAVE, LIKE, FIELD TRIPS.
ALWAYS DOING SOME ACTIVITIES WHILE THEY ARE THERE.
TEAMS, YOU KNOW, MOST PARENTS, THEY ARE WORRIED ABOUT WHERE
THEY TAKE THEIR KIDS.
AND I JUST -- I NEVER HAD THAT ISSUE HERE.
IT IS SO COMFORTABLE SENDING MY KIDS THIS.
MY SON, HE HAS, LIKE, SPEECH ISSUES.
SINCE HE HAS BEEN AT THAT DAY CARE, IT IS, LIKE, HIS SPEECH
HAS IMPROVED SO MUCH.
AND I REALLY APPRECIATE MISS JANAE AS WELL.
I CAN TELL SHE GENUINELY CARES ABOUT THE KIDS.
SHE IS ALWAYS ASKING US FOR FEEDBACK.
ALWAYS DOING SOMETHING HAND-ON TO HELP WITH THE STAFF, MAKE
ANY IMPROVEMENTS.
WHATEVER MORE THEY WANT TO DEVELOP, I FEEL LIKE IT WOULD BE
GREAT FOR MY FAMILY AND OTHER FAMILIES AS WELL.
05:35:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.
NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
START WITH YOUR NAME, AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
05:35:44PM >> HI, ZARIA.
AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY I AM TRYING TO FIND THE RIGHT DAY
CARE FOR MY SON HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN EASY.
I KNEW HE NEEDED A LITTLE EXTRA HELP, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW WHERE
TO START OR WHAT RESOURCES WERE AVAILABLE TO US.
ONE OF THE THINGS I AM MOST GRATEFUL FOR, KIDS IN PLAY NOT
ONLY CARED FOR MY SON BUT HELPED CONNECT ME WITH RESOURCES
I DIDN'T KNOW EXISTED.
WITH THEIR HELP, I WAS CONNECTED WITH THE EARLY LEARNING
COALITION AND GETTING INFORMATION OF SERVICES AND THERAPIES
THAT HAVE MADE A BIG DIFFERENCE IN MY SON'S DEVELOPMENT, AND
AS A PARENT, THAT SUPPORT MEANS EVERYTHING.
SOMETIMES YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHERE TO
TURN AND HAVING PEOPLE POINT YOU IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION CAN
CHAN,GE YOUR CHILD'S FUTURE.
SINCE RECEIVING THOSE SERVICES, I HAVE SEEN PROGRESS IN MY
SON.
GAINED SKILLS, CONFIDENCE AND GROWN IN WAYS THAT MAKE ME
PROUD OF DAY.
WHAT HAS ALSO MADE A DIFFERENCE IS THE ENVIRONMENT AT KIDS
IN PLAY.
THEY UNDERSTAND THAT EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT.
SMALLER GROUP SESSIONS WHEN NEEDED, CALMING CORNERS WHEN
CHILDREN CAN TAKE A BREAK AND REGROUP, AND SENSORY MATERIALS
THAT HELP CHILDREN FEEL COMFORTABLE THROUGHOUT THE DAY.
THOSE THINGS MAY SEEM SIMPLE, BUT FOR CHILDREN WHO NEED A
LITTLE EXTRA SUPPORT, THEY MAKE A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE.
AS A MOM, I WANT FOR MY CHILD TO BE UNDERSTOOD, SUPPORTED
AND TO BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY SUCCEED.
KIDS IN PLAY HAVE PROVIDED THAT FOR HIM.
05:37:09PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.
NEXT SPEAKER.
START WITH YOUR NAME, AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
05:37:15PM >> HI, I AM BRANDY.
MY SON GOES TO KIDS IN PLAY.
MY SON HAS DISABILITY AND LEARNS DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHER
CHILDREN.
AS A PARENT, IT IS HARD TO FIND CHILD CARE AS RIGHT FIT AND
TO FEEL COMFORTABLE LEAVING YOUR CHILD EVERY DAY.
HAVING A PLACE WHERE MY SON FEELS INCLUDED AND HAS AN
OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN AND GROW HAS MEANT SO MUCH TO US.
ANOTHER THING THAT HAS IS THE LOCATION.
THE CENTER IS CLOSE TO MY HOME, AND I AM ABLE TO WALK MY
CHILD THERE.
IT MAY SEEM LIKE A SMALL THING, BUT FOR OUR FAMILY, IT MAKES
A BIG DIFFERENCE.
IT IS CONVENIENT, CLOSE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND ALLOWS
MY CHILD TO ATTEND A QUALITY CHILD CARE PROGRAM WITHOUT
TRAVEL FAR FROM HOME.
ATTENDING KIDS IN PLAY, I HAVE SEEN MY SON GROW IN MANY
WAYS.
HE HAS BECOME MORE CONFIDENT, SOCIAL, AND MORE COMFORTABLE
INTERACTING WITH OTHER CHILDREN.
IT HAS BEEN AMAZING TO WATCH HIM TO CONTINUE TO LEARN AND
GROW IN AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE HE FEELS SUPPORTED.
THIS IS MORE THAN A PLACE FOR CHILDREN TO GO DURING THE DAY.
IT IS SOMETHING WE DEPEND ON.
ALLOWS THE PARENTS TO WORK, PROVIDE FOR FAMILY, AND HAVE A
PEACE OF MIND KNOWING THAT THEIR CHILDREN ARE BEING CARED
FOR.
KIDS IN PLAY FILLS AN IMPORTANT NEED IN OUR COMMUNITY.
NOT ONLY DOES IT PROVIDE CHILD CARE FOR WORKING FAMILIES,
BUT IT HELPS CHILDREN WITH UNIQUE ABILITY WHO MAY NEED EXTRA
UNDER UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORT.
FAMILIES NEED OPTION TOO.
IT WILL HELP MAKE IT POSSIBLE.
I WANT TO SHARE MY EXPERIENCE BECAUSE THE CENTER HAS A
POSITIVE IMPACT ON MY FAMILY, AND I KNOW MANY FAMILIES IN
OUR COMMUNITY THAT FEEL THE SAME WAY.
THANK YOU FOR THE TIME OF LISTENING.
05:39:13PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
HAVE A BEAUTIFUL EVENING.
ANYONE ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS
ITEM?
A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA.
SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED.
AYES HAVE IT.
WHO IS READY TO READ THIS ONE.
I AM SORRY, YOU GUYS -- ASSUMING THAT NO ONE SPOKE AGAINST
YOU.
YOU DO NOT HAVE A REBUTTAL.
DO YOU HAVE REBUTALL AT ALL FOR THE POSITIVE, GLOWING
REMARKS?
OKAY, COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON.
05:39:42PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I WOULD LIKE MOVE ITEM NUMBER 2, FILE NO.
REZ-26-07 .
ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION,
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN 4201 EAST OSBORNE AVENUE IN
THE CITY OF TAMPA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN ZONING
DISTRICT RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY PD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DAY CARE AND NURSERY FACILITY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
05:40:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET.
05:40:07PM >>BILL CARLSON:
INCLUDING A REVISION SHEET.
05:40:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON AND
SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
05:40:13PM >>LUIS VIERA:
BEFORE WE VOTE, I JUST WANTED TO SAY TO THE
MOMS OUT THERE THAT SPOKE ABOUT YOUR KIDS, THANK YOU ALL FOR
SHARING YOUR HEART ON SOMETHING SO PERSONAL.
THAT'S -- THAT IS, LOOK, REALLY AWESOME, AND WE APPRECIATE IT
AND GOD BLESS YOU GUYS AS MOMS.
05:40:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I KNEW YOU WERE TOUCHING HIS HEART.
I JUST -- I KNEW IT.
EXACTLY.
VERY GOOD.
I HAVE A MOTION.
I HAVE A SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
THE AYES HAVE IT.
UNANIMOUS.
AYES HAVE IT UNANIMOUSLY.
THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
NO JOKING.
05:40:49PM >>CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JULY 16, 2026 10 A.M. AT OLD
CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA,
FLORIDA 33602.
05:41:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MOVING RIGHT ALONG TO ITEM NUMBER 3.
05:41:09PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL, LaCHONE
DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
ITEM NUMBER 3 IS FILE NO. REZ-26-36 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1502 AND 1506 NORTH MORGAN STREET.
1501, 1505 AND 1507 NORTH MARION AVENUE.
REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM-24 RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL
INTENSIVE.
TURN IT OVER TO EMILY TO GIVE HER REPORT, AND I WILL COME
BACK TO GIVE MY REPORT.
THANK YOU.
05:41:41PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE, TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD
AND EVACUATION ZONE C.
THIS IS AN AERIAL OF SUBJECT SITE.
IT IS REPRESENTED AND OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
LIGHT COMMERCIAL IS TO THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST OF THE
SUBJECT SITE.
SOME SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY IS DIRECTLY TO THE EAST
OF THE SITE.
DIRECTLY SOUTH IS INTERSTATE 275.
THIS SITE RIGHT HERE IS A TECO SUBSTATION, AND THERE ARE
ALSO FDOT EASEMENTS TO THE SOUTH.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE.
IT IS OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
REPRESENTED WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 DESIGNATION,
WHICH IS TO THE NORTH, WEST, AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
TO THE EAST IS THE RESIDENTIAL 83 DESIGNATION AND TO THE
SOUTH ALONG THE INTERSTATE IS THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
SINCE THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN
VILLAGE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES ENHANCED DESIGN AND
PROMOTES A PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITH
DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES THAT ENCOURAGE TRANSIT USE.
THIS SITE IS LOCATED ONE BLOCK EAST OF NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE,
WHICH IS IDENTIFIED AS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR AND THE
REQUEST WILL PROVIDE INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON A SITE PREVIOUSLY
VACANT AND CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED.
SUPPORTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S POLICY OF ENCOURAGE
DEVELOPMENT NEAR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND TRANSIT.
ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO
CONTRIBUTE ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE
TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND URBAN VILLAGE, ALIGNING WITH
POLICY GUIDANCE THAT SUPPORTS EMPLOYMENT GENERATING USES AND
PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT SERVICES, COMPATIBLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
PER LAND USE POLICY 6.1.13, THE SUBJECT SITE WITHIN A
MIXED-USE CORRIDOR AND AS SUCH, FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
SITE SHOULD ADDRESS DESIGN POLICIES AS WELL AS ALL
APPLICABLE POLICIES IN THE PLAN.
MIXED USE CORRIDORS ARE IDENTIFIED AS AREAS WITH THE
GREATEST OPPORTUNITIES SUPPORT THE GRADUAL TRANSFORMATION OF
ROAD CORRIDOR WHERE IS INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE AND
ENCOURAGE NEW HOUSING AND JOB OPPORTUNITIES OF THE PEDESTRIAN
REQUIREMENT, LOOK OF THE STREET, SHOPPING OPPORTUNITIES AND
TRANSIT SERVICE FOR COMMUNITY RESIDENTS.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
AND PARKING AREAS TO BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE AND
APPROPRIATELY SCREENED.
AS SUCH, THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD ADDRESS LAND USE
POLICY 1.2.27.
OVERALL, THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY
DIRECTION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNED AND WILL EXPAND
COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITY WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN
VILLAGE.
WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, AND I AM AVAILABLE
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:44:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE.
NEXT.
05:44:38PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS REQUEST IS A EUCLIDIAN ZONING REQUEST FOR COMMERCIAL
ZONING.
NO SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST.
IF APPROVED, THE DEVELOPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD
REQUIRED IN THE CI ZONING DISTRICT.
AND IT REQUIRES FOR THE LOT 100 SQUARE FEET 10,000 SQUARE
FEET FOR THE TOTAL LOT.
LOT WIDTH OF 171 FEET AND A DEPTH OF 79 FEET.
MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED IS AT 45 FEET.
AND THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED.
YOU CAN SEE THIS DESIGNATION.
THIS PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HAS THAT RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY ZONING, THE RM-24.
NORTH OF THE PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY TO THE
WEST IS THE CI ZONING.
TO THE SOUTH, YOU HAVE 275.
TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE THAT DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI
DETACHED APPROVED THROUGH A PD NORTHEAST.
AND THIS WAS DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE EAST BY RIGHT.
THOSE UNITS THAT ARE THERE.
FURTHER NORTH OF THE ACTUAL PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS OFFICE THAT IS LOCATED THERE.
I HAVE PICTURES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.
SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS AT KM MORGAN, AND THIS IS IF YOU ARE LOOKING NORTH.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY HERE.
THIS IS THE PORTION OF THE SITE THAT HAS THAT RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY ZONING CURRENTLY.
AND THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE HAS THAT COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE
AS YOU HEAD FURTHER NORTH ON THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS A VIEW SOUTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS ON KAY STREET LOOKING WEST.
SO THE PROPERTY IS OFF TO THE RIGHT IN THIS PICTURE.
THIS IS SOUTH.
THIS IS THE INTERSTATE.
THIS IS TO THE SOUTH.
THIS IS TECO.
JUST LOCATED WEST.
THIS IS NORTH OF THE PROPERTY.
THIS IS THAT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED.
THAT IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON MORGAN.
SO DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST.
FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA REGULATIONS.
I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
05:47:23PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL?
I HAVE A QUESTION.
WITH THIS RECLASSIFICATION, CAN YOU EXPLAIN SOME OF THE
USES, AND DOES THAT INCLUDE PARKING?
SURFACE PARKING LOT?
05:47:34PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES, ABSOLUTELY.
SO THE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE IS THE HIGHEST COMMERCIAL ZONE
WITHIN THE CITY.
THERE IS COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND
COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
IT IS THE MOST INTENSIVE.
A VARIETY OF USES LIKE A RESTAURANT.
IT ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL PARKING WITH A SPECIAL USE
APPROVAL.
SO THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO COME IN, AND IT AS SPECIAL
USE ONE.
SO IT WOULD BE ADMINISTRATIVE.
05:48:04PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CURRENTLY USED FOR TRUCK PARKING?
I GOT AN E-MAIL THAT IT WAS CURRENTLY USED FOR TRUCK
PARKING.
05:48:12PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
WE HAVE IT IN OUR SYSTEM.
IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT.
I LOOKED IN THE SYSTEM BECAUSE I ALWAYS CHECK THE PROPERTIES
BEFORE REZONING TO SEE IF ANYTHING IS OPEN, AND WE PUT IT IN
OUR REZONING REPORT.
THERE WASN'T ANYTHING OPEN AS FAR AS A VIOLATION OR
ANYTHING.
05:48:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
COUNCIL MEMBER YOUNG.
05:48:30PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
YOU SAID IT IS NOT -- IN THE PICTURES IT HAD
TRUCKS ON IT.
05:48:37PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LET ME SHOW THE PROPERTY AGAIN.
SO THIS -- IS THIS THE ONE YOU ARE REFERENCING?
THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
YES, THIS IS PART OF THE PROPERTY ITSELF, BUT WE DO NOT HAVE
IN OUR SYSTEM A PERMIT THAT IS PULLED FOR TRUCK PARKING ON
THE SITE.
AND I THINK THE REQUEST IS NOW FOR THE CI ZONING TO MAYBE
GET THEM THERE -- I CAN SAY -- THE APPLICANT CAN SAY WHAT
THEY WANT THE CI ZONING FOR.
05:49:14PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
OKAY.
05:49:15PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT DOES THAT SIGN SAY, THE YELLOW.
05:49:19PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THE YELLOW?
LET ME ZOOM IN ON THAT.
OH, IT IS A LITTLE FUZZY.
YEAH, I CAN'T -- I CAN'T MAKE IT OUT.
05:49:31PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SAYS "TRUCK PARKING."
05:49:34PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
WELL, I HOPE IT DOESN'T.
WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT THAT.
05:49:41PM >> TRUCK PARKING PROBABLY LIKE -- TRUCK PARKING ONLY OR
SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT.
05:49:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
WELL, THAT SOUNDS LIKE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
MR. MICHELINI, ARE YOU THE APPLICANT?
05:49:58PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THANK YOU.
05:49:58PM >> GOOD EVENING, STEVE MICHELINI, I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
THIS PROPOSAL IS A REQUEST FOR THE CHANGING OF THE ZONING
FROM RM-24 TO CI.
IT IS PART -- PART OF A PARCEL.
I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU.
THE PROPERTY OWNERS OWN THE NORTHERN HALF OF THIS.
THIS IS ALREADY ZONED CI.
AND THEY DIDN'T REALIZE UNTIL WE FILED THE APPLICATION THAT
THIS PORTION WAS ZONED RM-24.
SO THE PROPOSAL HERE IS TO MAKE ALL OF THEIR PROPERTIES
CONSISTENT WITH THE CI ZONING.
AND AS YOU HAVE SEEN FROM THE -- FROM THE STAFF REPORT, FROM
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ALSO FROM THE CITY STAFF, THAT
THEY FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT.
IT IS ADJACENT TO A TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
IT IS ALSO IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE INTERSTATE.
AND I THINK -- SO IT'S TUCKED IN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 275.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY -- ALL OF THIS IS CI ZONING ON THE NORTH
AND THE WEST SIDES.
YOU HAVE CBD ON THE SOUTH SIDE DOWN HERE.
SO IT IS DIVIDED -- IT IS DIVIDED BY THE INTERSTATE WITH
HIGHER INTENSITY.
THERE ARE NO CURRENT PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT.
THEY SIMPLY WANT TO CONSOLIDATE THE PROPERTY SO THAT IN THE
FUTURE THAT THEY CAN DEVELOP IT.
THE -- THERE ARE NO WAIVERS THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER -- UNDER
THE CI ZONING.
YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION THAT IS
THERE.
IT IS ALSO IN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS OVERLAY WHICH HAS
TO COMPLY WITH THE URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THAT.
IT IS PART OF THE URBAN VILLAGE.
AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF THOSE PROPERTIES WILL ENABLE THEM
TO REDEVELOP THAT IN THE FUTURE.
IT IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE GUIDELINES, AS I SAID, WITH
HOW IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE FOR CI ZONING.
THE ISSUE OF PARKING DID COME UP.
THEY WERE USING THAT FOR OVERFLOW PARKING.
PART OF THAT WAS ESTABLISHED FOR ULELE AND A VALET LOT.
I JUST BECAME AWARE OF THE TRUCK ISSUE WHEN I SAW THE LETTER
THAT WAS FILED BY ONE OF THE RESIDENTS.
AND I INQUIRED WITH THE COMPANY ABOUT WHAT THEY HAD.
AND THEY DID HAVE A POST UP THAT ALLOWED FOR THAT.
THAT HAS SINCE CEASED.
ANYTHING THAT GOES FORWARD IN THE FUTURE REGARDING PARKING WILL
HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE.
I WASN'T AWARE OF IT UNTIL LATE YESTERDAY, AND WE ADDRESSED IT
IMMEDIATELY AND TOOK DOWN THE ABILITY FOR ANYONE TO DO THAT.
THE ISSUE WAS THAT THEY WEREN'T USING AS A PERMANENT PARKING
LOT, BUT SIMPLY IT WAS OVERFLOW WITH OCCASIONAL.
BUT, AGAIN, THAT ACTIVITY HAS CEASED.
I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE
REGARDING THAT.
IT IS IN THE TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR.
IT IS IDEALLY SITUATED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THAT IS THE INTENT OF THIS REQUEST.
05:53:48PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IS THAT IT?
05:53:53PM >> SO FAR, YES, SIR.
05:53:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHO WANTS TO START?
I WAS -- WELL, ANY QUESTIONS?
I GUESS IT IS JUST ME.
ULELE, THREE QUARTERS OF A MILE.
VALET PARKING FOR ULELE.
05:54:12PM >> I SAID OVERFLOW WHEN THEY HAD MAJOR EVENTS.
AND THIS IS WHAT WAS TOLD TO ME.
05:54:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT IS A LONG HAUL.
SO IT IS CURRENTLY BEING USED AS -- UP UNTIL YESTERDAY
AFTERNOON, IT WAS USED AS TRUCK PARKING.
BUT THE PROBLEM WITH THE CI, PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, YOU CAME
TO US WITH THE PD, WE WOULD BE PINNING DOWN USES BUT IN MY
UNDERSTANDING, THE CI COULD BE LAUNDRY, DOG KENNELS.
I AM TRYING REACH BACK INTO MY HEAD BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A
LIST IN FRONT OF ME, BUT INCLUDING -- INCLUDING SURFACE
PARKING THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MINIMIZE.
ESPECIALLY BEING RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM -- AM I
CORRECT?
THE USES IN THIS AREA?
05:55:03PM >> WELL, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE OVERALL AREA.
IT IS ALL CI SURROUNDING THERE, EXCEPT ON THE EAST SIDE.
AND THE EAST SIDE HAD A VERY INTENSIVE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
SO YOU COULD HAVE HIGH-RISES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT EXCEPT IT
IS RM-24.
YOU COULD ACHIEVE A HIGHER DENSITY BY GOING PD.
THEY DID NOT WANT TO GO TO A PD BECAUSE NO PLAN AT THIS
POINT FOR CONSTRUCTION OR REDEVELOPMENT.
BUT I WOULD SAY THAT IN THE FUTURE, THIS COULD VERY WELL BE
THE SITE FOR APARTMENTS OR CONDOMINIUMS.
IT IS NOT INTENDED -- THE CI ZONING WOULD ALSO ALLOW, YOU
KNOW, HEAVY MANUFACTURING FOR GAS STATIONS AND ENGINE
REPAIRS.
THIS IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE SITE FOR THAT.
IT IS SIMPLY -- BECAUSE THE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT ARE
IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ARE ALREADY CI.
THEY WANTED TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT.
05:56:04PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHY NEXT TO THIS PROPERTY?
05:56:06PM >> NO REASON TO BE RM-24.
NOT AN EXPANSION.
IT IS A CONSOLIDATION.
THE CI, CI, CI.
ALL THE WAY AROUND EXCEPT FOR THIS ONE LITTLE PORTION.
05:56:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
05:56:20PM >> I WOULD SAY BASED ON CONSISTENCY OF THE PROPERTY, THEN IN
THE CITY WOULD BE HARD PRESSED NOT TO SAY, YEAH, CONSOLIDATE
IT.
AND THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
CONSOLIDATE THE ZONING.
MAKE IT CONSISTENT AND WHEN IT COMES IN UNDER PD, THERE WILL
BE MORE ABILITY TO RESTRICT THE USES AND HOW IT LOOKS.
THANK YOU.
BUT YOU STILL HAVE TO MEET THE TAMPA HEIGHTS OVERLAY, WHICH
IS GOING TO DETERMINE WHAT THIS WILL LOOK LIKE IN THE
FUTURE.
05:56:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
STAFF?
CAN YOU -- DO YOU HAVE A LIST OF THE -- THE USES.
IF WE REZONE THIS TO CI DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THAT MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING.
WHAT ARE THE WORST-CASE SCENARIOS?
WHAT COULD THEY PUT HERE?
05:57:09PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
ABSOLUTELY, COUNCIL, LaCHONE DOCK, LAND
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I CAN PUT THE USE TABLE UP FOR YOU.
USES I HAVE CHECKED ARE USES THAT ARE ALLOWED WITHIN CI.
SO THERE ARE USES LIKE AUTO RENTAL, BANK, CRAFT
DISTILLERY, COMMERCIAL KITCHENS, DRY CLEANING PLANT, LARGE
AND SMALL, A LARGE AND SMALL KENNEL IS A PERMITTED USE.
DENTAL AND MEDICAL LABORATORY, MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE
FACILITY, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, MARINA, MICROBREWERY.
BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, MEDICAL OFFICE, NURSING CARE FACILITY
IN ADDITION TO PERSONAL SERVICES, PHARMACY, PLACE OF
ASSEMBLY, LIGHT PRINTING, PRESSING AND PUBLISHING, RADIO OR
TELEVISION STUDIO, RECREATIONAL FACILITY AND INDOOR
FACILITY.
COMMERCIAL IS AN ALLOWABLE USE.
PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITY.
A RESTAURANT.
RETAIL BAKERY.
RETAIL SALES.
FOR CONVENIENCE GOODS, ALL OF THE RETAIL SALES CATEGORIES,
AS A MATTER OF FACT ARE ALLOWED IN THE CI.
REUPHOLSTERY SHOP.
SPECIAL EVENT PARKING.
STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL FOR OFFICE IS ALLOWED.
TEMPORARY FILM PRODUCTION.
TRANSPORTATION SERVICE FACILITY.
TRUCK AND TRAILER RENTAL.
VEHICLE REPAIR, MAJOR AND MINOR.
AND VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING.
AND THEN CONTROL AND RELATED SERVICES.
VET OFFICE, WAREHOUSE, AND WHOLESALE TRADE.
ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYTHING BUT THE KITCHEN SINK.
05:58:59PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
MINI WAREHOUSE AND WINE PRODUCTION.
05:59:02PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON.
05:59:04PM >>BILL CARLSON:
MR. MICHELINI, CAN YOU PUT THE PLAN DOWN,
THE OUTLINE OF THE PROPERTY.
05:59:09PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THE USE TABLE?
05:59:11PM >>BILL CARLSON:
NO, THE PLAN.
RED SQUARE IS ALL THE PROPERTY THEY OWN, RIGHT?
05:59:16PM >> YES.
05:59:17PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SO THE NORTHERN PART OF IT, THEY COULD
ALREADY DO ALL THOSE THINGS.
05:59:21PM >> YES.
05:59:22PM >>BILL CARLSON:
AND THIS EASTERN SIDE OF IT ALREADY IS NEXT
TO THE RESIDENTIAL.
SO IF THE -- IF THIS IS NOT APPROVED, THEY CAN STILL PUT ANY
OF THAT STUFF IN HALF THE PROPERTY, CORRECT?
05:59:37PM >> CORRECT.
05:59:37PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IF IT FITS.
05:59:40PM >> THEY OWN THIS WHOLE PORTION UP HERE.
DOUBLING THE SIZE.
THIS IS HALF OF WHAT THEY OWN.
05:59:50PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE NEED TO SEND YOU BACK TO GEOMETRY.
05:59:55PM >> THE SOUTHERN HALF IS HALF OF WHAT THEY OWN.
THEY OWN THIS ENTIRE PARCEL HERE.
06:00:01PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IS IT -- WHO HAS THE ACTUAL ZONING MAP ON
THIS THAT SHOWS --
06:00:05PM >> THIS IS THE ACTUAL ZONING MAP.
06:00:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT IS NOT LIKE HALF, A THIRD AND TWO
THIRD.
I MEAN IT IS NOT HALF.
06:00:11PM >> WHAT I AM SAYING IS THEY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE
PROPERTY ALREADY.
AND IT DOESN'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE TO SPLIT IT AND NOT ALLOW
THEM TO GO FORWARD WITH THE CI TO CONSOLIDATE.
06:00:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT IN DISCUSSION.
WHAT -- WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE LOT IS CI AND WHAT PERCENTAGE IS
RM-24?
DO WE KNOW THAT?
06:00:35PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THREE QUARTERS OF PROPERTY HAS THE RM.
THREE QUARTERS HAVE THE RM ZONING.
06:00:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
ANYTHING ELSE?
06:00:47PM >> I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY MORE QUESTIONS THAT YOU
HAVE.
YOU GOT TO REMEMBER THEY HAVE CC-35 AS A LAND USE, SO IT IS
ANTICIPATED TO BE HIGHER INTENSIVE USE ALREADY.
06:00:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY, VERY GOOD.
OKAY.
HEARING NOTHING ELSE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO
SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.
YOU WOULD STAND UP AGAINST THE WALL, PLEASE.
OKAY.
SO ONE AT A TIME.
IF YOU APPROACH THE PODIUM, THE MICROPHONE IS EMBEDDED IN
THE PODIUM.
EACH PERSON, START WITH YOUR NAM,E AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE
MINUTES.
GO AHEAD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
YOU CAN AND THIS TO MR. SHELBY, OUR ATTORNEY, AND HE WILL
DISTRIBUTE IT TO US.
DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH COPY FOR ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS.
06:01:48PM >> I JUST HAVE ONE DOCUMENT.
06:01:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ONE TO PUT ON THE OVERHEAD.
06:01:52PM >> I HAVE ONE FOR MYSELF.
06:01:54PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT THAT IN THE RECORD.
ARE YOU GOING TO BE SHOWING THAT?
06:01:57PM >> NOT THE ENTIRE THING BUT STUFF I AM NOT SURE WAS
SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THAT WANT TO BE INCLUDED.
06:02:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
INCLUDED IN THE RECORD, VERY GOOD.
THIS GENTLEMAN UP HERE IN THE CAGE.
OKAY.
HAVE HIM LOOK AT THAT REAL QUICK.
ARE YOU GOOD?
06:02:30PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
HE WANT THAT INTO THE RECORD?
SIR, ARE YOU DOING THIS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUTTING IN THE
RECORD?
06:02:36PM >> YES, SIR.
06:02:37PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
OKAY.
AND DO YOU HAVE A -- ARE YOU GOING TO BE DISPLAYING THAT FOR
THE ENTIRE COUNCIL OR JUST WANT THEM TO SEE IT WITHOUT
EXPLANATION?
06:02:47PM >> I WILL BE REFERENCING IT.
I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT IN THERE.
I AM NOT GOING TO GO OVER ALL OF THAT, AND BUT THERE ARE
PICTURES I CAN SHOW THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION.
06:02:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SHOW US IS WHAT YOU
WANT IN THE RECORD.
06:03:03PM >> ALL OF IT CAN BE IN THE RECORD.
IT MIGHT JUST BE A LITTLE REDUNDANT.
ALAN CLENDENIN: I WILL LEAVE THAT UP TO MR. SHELBY.
06:03:12PM >> I APOLOGIZE.
06:03:13PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
WELL, I --
06:03:18PM >> I CAN DO MY PRESENTATION WITHOUT THE PICTURES --
06:03:22PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
NO, NO, DO YOUR PRESENTATION, AND WE WILL PUT
THIS IN THE RECORD, AND I WILL GIVE THIS TO MR. MICHELINI
SO HE CAN LOOK AT IT, AND IF HE HAS ANY ISSUE ABOUT THIS,
THEN HE CAN DO THAT DURING REBUTTAL.
06:03:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY, SIR.
START WITH YOUR NAME, AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
AND THE OVERHEAD, IF YOU PUT IT FACE UP, IT AUTOMATICALLY
WILL PROJECT.
06:03:45PM >> MY NAME IS DOM SALA.
WHAT I HAVE IN THE PACKET SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, CODE
ENFORCEMENT RECORD, PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SOME
WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT DID NOT MAKE ELECTRONICALLY, BUT ALSO A
WRITTEN OPPOSITION FROM THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
SO I KNOW WE ARE JUST TALKING ABOUT WHAT THAT PICTURE WAS OR
WHAT THAT SIGN WAS THAT WAS CLEARLY AN AD FOR TRUCK PARKING
ON THAT LOT.
BUT I WANT TO GET STARTED.
1501 NORTH MORGAN STREET DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THIS LOT.
I ASK FOR YOU TO DENY OR CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 3.
THI IS THE CITY OWN'S RECORD.
CODE ENFORCEMENT HAS AN OPEN CASE CMP 26000509 AT 1501 NORTH
MARION, ONE OF THE PARCELS IN THIS REQUEST.
STATUS TODAY, INVESTIGATION IN PROGRESS.
CITY ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO ACCARDI AND SONS LCC BY
CERTIFIED MAIL.
CITY'S OWN WORDS, SEMI TRUCK PARKED IN LOT.
IN VIOLATION.
THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA.
CITY INSPECTED TWICE.
BOTH INSPECTIONS FAILED.
VIOLATION WAS NOT CORRECT, AND I AM SUBMITTING THAT INTO THE
RECORD.
I RAISE THAT BECAUSE THE STAFF REPORT IN FRONT OF YOU JUNE 4
CALLS THE SITE VACANT.
IT IS NOT.
THE CITY'S OWN INSPECTORS DOCUMENTED TRUCKS THERE, AND THEY
SHOWED TRUCKS THERE.
MY CENTRAL POINT.
THIS IS STRAIGHT COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE WITH NO SITE PLANS AND
NO CONDITIONS.
STAFF REPORT SAY DATE OF SITE PLAN NOT APPLICABLE.
BUT THE APPLICANT'S OWN CERTIFIED CERTIFICATION SAID
PROPOSED USE IS STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A BINDING SITE. THE
IN THEIR OWN AFFIDAVIT, AUTHORIZES THEM TO AGREE TO THE
CONDITIONS.
SO I ASK FOR CONDITION CI, STRAIGHT CI KEEPS THE HEAVY
COMMERCIAL MENU AGAINST OUR HOMES AS YOU WERE JUST
REFERENCING, INCLUDING THE TRUCK USE, CITY.
SO I RESPECTFULLY ASK TO DENY THE STRAIGHT CI ZONING OR
CONTINUE IT AND HAVE THEM FILE FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
WITH BINDING SITE PLAN AND THE BUFFERING WALL THAT THE CODE
REQUIRES CLOSE TO HOMES.
THE STRAIGHT CI GIVES THE FAMILIES IN THE BLOCK NO
ENFORCEABLE PROTECTION.
SO THIS IS A PICTURE I THINK WAS TAKEN YESTERDAY.
CLEARLY PARKED.
AND ANOTHER THING I WANTED TO SHOW IS AN ACTIVE AD.
GOOGLE BUSINESS AD.
I SCREEN SHOTTED THIS TODAY.
TRUCK PARKING CLUB.
THEY ACTUALLY HAVE A REVIEW.
FIVE-STAR REVIEW TWO MONTHS AGO.
THIS IS GOING ON ACTIVELY.
IF WE DROVE THERE RIGHT NOW, THEY WOULD STILL BE THERE.
THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO PRESENT FOR YOU GUYS TODAY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
06:06:39PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT SPEAKER.
YES, MA'AM.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.
06:06:50PM >> MY NAME IS NICOLE PETERIKA.
I APOLOGIZE, I WAS NOT HERE EARLIER, AND I HAVE
NOT BEEN SWORN IN.
[SWEARING IN]
06:07:04PM >> I DO.
AGAIN, MY NAME IS NICOLE PETERIKA, A RESIDENT AND BUSINESS
OWNER IN TAMPA HEIGHTS.
I AM ALSO THE SECOND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION FOR TAMPA HEIGHTS.
AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE SUBMITTED A LETTER TO YOU THAT WAS
PREPARED AND SUBMITTED FROM THE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
DIRECTLY OPPOSING THIS MOVE.
LET ME BE CLEAR, AND I THINK YOU ALL KNOW THIS, THE
APPLICANT IS IN THE BUSINESS OF PARKING.
SO IT SHOULD BE NO MYSTERY WHAT THEIR INTENT IS BY MAKING
THE CHANGE IN THE ZONING.
AS HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED, AND I PULLED UP AS WE WERE
TALKING, THIS TRUCK PARKING CLUB DOES ACTIVELY AS OF THIS
MEETING RIGHT NOW DISPLAY IT AS AN ACTIVE TRUCK PARKING
LOCATION.
SO IT HAS NOT CEASED.
THEY COULD HAVE PULLED THE SIGN OUT OF THE GROUND.
IT IS STILL THERE.
PARKING IS STILL HAPPENING.
I WILL ALSO SAY AS A RESIDENT AND A MOTHER OF TWO CHILDREN,
I DRIVE DOWN MORGAN EVERY SINGLE DAY TO DROP MY KIDS OFF TO
SCHOOL.
THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES WITH MORGAN.
WE ALL KNOW THEM.
ADDING TRUCK PARKING TO THAT SITE, WHICH IS A TRANSITION FROM
TAMPA HEIGHTS INTO OUR BEAUTIFUL DOWNTOWN THAT IS DEVELOPING
SO WONDERFULLY, THAT IS NOT THE RIGHT, APPROPRIATE USE.
I DON'T CARE IF IT IS CONSISTENT.
WE DO NOT NEED TRUCK PARKING IN THE MIDDLE OF DOWNTOWN.
SO I JUST WANT TO IMPLORE YOU ABOUT THAT, AND ALSO WHAT WAS
NOT SORT OF DISCUSSED VERY MUCH IN THE CONSISTENCY REPORTS
IS THAT THE PD AND A BLOCK NORTH AND COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE.
I BELIEVE THAT IS PLANNED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS
ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT WE HAVE BEEN SEEING AND THIS WE
ENCOURAGE AND WANT TO SEE MORE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
AGAIN, DOES NOT SUPPORT THAT.
THANK YOU.
06:09:00PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
06:09:03PM >> HI.
MY NAME IS DAVID AARONSON.
I AM A RESIDENT IN THE TOWN HOMES ACROSS THE STREET THAT WE
SAW IN THE PICTURE.
AND I WOULD JUST LIKE SAY AS THE OTHER PUBLIC SPEAKERS HAVE
SAID, THAT THE INTENSIVE PURPOSE FOR THIS PERMIT IS TO -- OR
REZONING IS FOR TRUCK PARKING.
THERE ARE ADS ONLINE RIGHT NOW.
THE SIGNS MAY HAVE BEEN TAKEN DOWN LAST NIGHT, BUT I THINK
MR. MICHELINI AND HIS CLIENT KNOWS WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
THEY MISLED THE COUNCIL.
SHOWN A DISREGARD FOR TAMPA STATE CODE.
AND I THINK THEY SHOULD NOT BE AWARDED THIS PERMIT.
AND ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT FILED WHAT THEIR INTENT
IS ON THE APPLICATION LIKE WE SAW ON THE PREVIOUS HEARING
BEFORE US.
THEY CAME WITH SPECIFIC SITE PLANS, AND IT SHOULD BE REZONED.
MR. MICHELINI AND HIS CLIENT SHOWED NO INTENT FOR WHAT THEY
WANT TO DO WITH THIS REZONING.
AND GIVEN THERE ARE ACTIVE WEB SITES AND GOOGLE ADS FOR
TRUCK PARKING, I DON'T THINK THAT HELPS WITH THE PEDESTRIAN
AREA OF THE HISTORIC TAMPA HEIGHTS.
THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF FAMILIES THAT LIVE WITHIN A HALF-MILE
RADIUS.
A SPOUTS ACROSS THE STREET.
PEOPLE ARE WALKING THERE ALL THE TIME.
THE RIVERWALK IS RIGHT DOWN THE STREET.
I THINK ADDING A TON OF SEMI-TRUCK PARKING IS A PUBLIC
HAZARD AND NOT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE APPROVED.
06:10:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
START WITH YOUR NAME.
06:10:40PM >> GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, MY NAME IS PAM REYES.
I OWN A TOWN HOME AT MORGAN STREET TOWN HOMES.
I'M HERE TONIGHT TO STRONGLY OPPOSE THE REZONING REQUEST FOR
THE SEMI-TRUCK PARKING BUSINESS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
AS YOU MAY KNOW, THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BEEN IN
TRANSITION OVER MANY YEARS.
WE ARE MOVING FORWARD AND JUST RECHANGING AND REVAMPING THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
THIS PROPOSAL SETS US BACK, NOT FORWARD.
AND I WANTED TO POINT OUT THREE REASONS WHY I OPPOSE THIS.
FIRST OF ALL, DESTRUCTION OF HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE.
THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT FEATURES SMALLER ROADS, PAVED
ROADS, HISTORIC PAVED ROADS, AND VERY EXPENSIVE TO REPAIR.
SO WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THESE SEMI-TRUCKS BEARING A LOT
OF WEIGHT ON THESE ROADS, IT COULD BE JUST EASY WAY TO
DESTROY THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE ROADS.
SECONDLY, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
WE HAVE CHILDREN.
WE HAVE PEOPLE WHO WALK TO SPROUTS, LIKE THEY MENTIONED TO
ARMATURE WORKS.
PEOPLE WHO WALK DOWNTOWN.
A VERY SHORT COMMUTE HERE.
SO IT WILL EFFECT WHEN IT COMES TO SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS.
THIRDLY, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS IN AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE, NOT
A RESIDENTIAL ZONE.
NOISE, SAFETY, AND DIESEL EXHAUST FOR OUR FAMILY, CHILDREN,
DOGS AND FOR OUR OWN HEALTH.
I JUST ASK YOU TO, PLEASE, CONSIDER THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN
USING THE PROPERTY ACCORDING TO THE ZONING.
AND I FEEL THAT THE SAME RULES APPLY TO THEM AS THEY APPLY
TO ME.
AND I URGENTLY ASK THAT YOU VOTE NO ON THIS REZONING.
THANK YOU.
06:12:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
START WITH YOUR NAME.
06:12:24PM >> MY NAME IS ALISON FUEL.
I WAS NOT SWORN IN.
06:12:27PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO IS GOING
TO SPEAK, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN
IN BY OUR CLERK.
[SWEARING IN]
06:12:39PM >> YES.
06:12:39PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
06:12:41PM >> I AM PART OF THE PROPERTY NORTH OF THOSE LOTS, AND I JUST
WANTED TO COMMENT ABOUT THE TRUCK PARKING.
THERE IS AN OVERFLOW ISSUE.
SEVERAL OF THE TRUCKS NOW PARK ON THE STREET AS A PARALLEL
PARKING SITUATION.
AND WHEN WE TRY TO EXIT OUR PARKING LOT, THERE IS A TRUCK
RIGHT THERE AND BUSES ARE COMING DOWN.
AND YOU CANNOT SEE AROUND THE TRUCKS TO SEE THE BUSES COMING
BECAUSE OF THE HEIGHT OF THE TRUCK.
I HAVE LITERALLY HAD TO GET OUT OF MY CAR AND KNOCK ON THE
WINDOW OF THE TRUCKER AND ASK HIM TO MOVE BECAUSE I CAN'T
SEE.
I DON'T WANT ANY OF OUR EMPLOYEES ENDANGERED BY A BUS COMING
DOWN THERE.
WE ALREADY HAD AN INCIDENT ON MARION IN THE PAST WHERE A
TRUCK AND A BUS COLLIDED.
I DON'T WANT THAT TO HAPPEN AGAIN.
06:13:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT IS THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY?
06:13:38PM >> IT IS A LAW FIRM.
06:13:39PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO SPEAK THIS ITEM?
OKAY.
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
SO THERE WAS SOME TESTIMONY THAT THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH
HAS PD TO IT.
CAN YOU SHOW WHERE IT IS.
06:13:55PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AND THIS IS IT.
THIS IS TO THE NORTH.
THIS A PD.
06:14:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THE PD FOR MULTIFAMILY?
06:14:09PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES.
OTHER TWO PDs HERE AND THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED.
DIRECTLY EAST.
AND THIS IS THE PROPERTY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
06:14:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THE PROPERTY -- THE SQUARE BLOCK JUST
NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WHAT?
06:14:25PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THIS?
06:14:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
BELOW THAT, THE OTHER BOX.
NORTH THERE.
BETWEEN THE TWO.
BETWEEN THE PD AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
06:14:33PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
BETWEEN THE PD THAT IS JUST A COMMERCIAL
INTENSIVE.
06:14:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THE PERSON WHO SPOKE.
THAT IS YOUR LAW OFFICE?
SHE IS NODDING YES.
06:14:47PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THE SAME ZONING.
SORRY I WROTE INITIALS ON HERE BUT THIS IS ALL CI.
THIS THIS IS A POCKET OF CI ALSO, AND THIS IS THAT
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY WITHIN THIS AREA HERE.
06:15:00PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
GOTCHA.
06:15:03PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THAT IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND THE
OTHER PD, RESIDENTIAL.
06:15:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
RM-24 TO THE NORTH -- WHAT THAT -- LOOKS
LIKE A SWIMMING POOL.
06:15:14PM >> THAT IS TO THE EAST, NOT TO THE NORTH.
06:15:17PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
TO THE NORTHEAST IS RM-24.
TO THE EAST IS RM-24.
ON THE WEST SIDE OF MORGAN, YOU GET INTO YOUR CI ZONING
WHICH IS ALL OF THIS.
ALL OF THIS OPEN AREA IS CI.
06:15:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT LITTLE PIECE OF THAT PARCEL MUST BE
PART OF THE BIGGER PD OF THE HOUSING TO THE NORTH OF THE
TOWN HOUSES.
06:15:43PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THIS PD HERE.
06:15:45PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON?
06:15:57PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I THINK I KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS.
THIS THE CATEGORY, WE CAN'T EXCLUDE ONE USE, RIGHT?
06:16:02PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
CORRECT.
IF THIS WAS APPROVED FOR A CI ZONING, THE APPLICANT WOULD
HAVE ANY USE ALLOWED IN CI.
06:16:09PM >>BILL CARLSON:
AGAIN, SPECIFICALLY IS SEMI TRUCK PARKING A~
LOWED?
06:16:16PM >>LACHONE DOCK:
IT IS ALLOWED.
PARKING IS ALLOWED AS SPECIAL USE 1.
SO THE APPLICANT -- IF CI IS APPROVED ON THE PROPERTY, THE
APPLICANT COULD APPLY THROUGH OUR OFFICE FOR A SPECIAL USE
1, WHICH IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TO ALLOW THAT PARKING
ON THE PROPERTY.
06:16:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT ABOUT SEMI-TRUCKS?
A SEPARATE CATEGORY FOR THAT?
06:16:38PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
IT IS NOT.
THEY WILL BE ABLE TO PARK THEM.
06:16:42PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT IS THE LIMIT.
WILL THAT S-1 BE APPROVED?
06:16:48PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
IF THE STANDARDS ARE MET, THEY ARE TYPICALLY
APPROVED.
THEY WILL BE APPROVED AND MEET THE PARKING STANDARDS WITH
THE WIDTH OF THE PARKING SPACE PROVIDING THE APPROPRIATE
BUFFERING.
VEHICLE USE AREA AND MEET THE OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS.
06:17:02PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF THE PUBLIC OBJECTED TO THAT, THERE IS
SOME KIND OF COMPLAINT OR APPEAL PROCESS OR SOMETHING LIKE
THAT?
06:17:09PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THERE IS AN APPEAL.
COULD YOU APPEAL THE DECISION, BUT IF THE STANDARDS ARE MET,
THEN THE APPLICATION WOULD LIKELY -- IT WOULD BE APPROVED
THROUGH THE SPECIAL USE 1 CRITERIA.
06:17:22PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. SHELBY, ARE YOU REACHING FOR YOUR MIC.
06:17:28PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I HAVE GONE GOING TO ASK MR. MICHELINI TO
RETURN THE FOLDER OF THE DOCUMENTS.
06:17:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SO WE CAN REVIEW?
06:17:35PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
YES.
06:17:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU, LACHONE.
MR. MICHELINI.
06:17:39PM >> I WILL BE HAPPY TO RETURN THEM AS SOON AS I FINISH
LOOKING AT THEM 25 TO 30 PAGES.
I WON'T WITH THEM, HOW IS THAT.
06:17:48PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU WANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM?
06:17:54PM >> I HAVE SEEN WHAT THEY ARE SAYING.
06:17:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
LET'S TAKE A TEN-MINUTE RECESS.
A REAL TEN-MINUTE RECESS, AND WE WILL BE BACK HERE AT 6:30,
OKAY.
IN THE MEANTIME, GIVE US ENOUGH TIME TO COPY THEM SO WE CAN
MAKE COPIES FOR COUNCIL AS WELL.
06:18:08PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
[RECESS]
06:34:22PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
HERE.
06:34:23PM >>LUIS VIERA:
HERE.
06:34:24PM >>BILL CARLSON:
HERE.
06:34:25PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HERE.
06:34:26PM >>CLERK:
WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM.
06:34:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
MR. MICHELINI, REBUTTAL?
06:34:34PM >> YOU KNOW, SOME OF COMMENTS ARE -- I UNDERSTAND THAT IS
NOT AN EXCUSE BUT AN EXPLANATION.
BUT I THINK IF THE COUNCIL IS LOOKING FOR ASSURANCES THAT
THIS SITE WILL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, INCLUDING THE
REMOVAL OF -- AND I WAS ALREADY TOLD TODAY THAT THE WEB PAGE
AND ALL OF THAT STUFF WAS GOING TO BE REMOVED AS OF THIS
AFTERNOON.
OWNERS ARE NOT IN THE COUNTRY.
AND I DID SPEAK WITH THEM AT LENGTH.
AND THEY INSTRUCTED THE STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THE TRUCKS AND
ALL OF THE ASSOCIATED ISSUES REGARDING THAT WOULD BE REMOVED.
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE MATTER BE CONTINUED UNTIL
SEPTEMBER 10 TO MAKE SURE ALL OF THE ELECTRONIC
NOTIFICATIONS, ALL OF THE SIGNS AND ALL OF THE VEHICLES ARE
REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE.
NOW THE NORTHERN PART OF THIS PROPERTY COULD ALREADY AS CI
BE USED FOR THAT, BUT I AM NOT TRYING TO PUSH THAT ISSUE.
I WOULD RATHER HAVE THE TIME TO BRING THE SITE INTO
GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE.
MAKE SURE THERE ARE NO ISSUE RELATED TO THIS AND
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE CONTINUANCE TO SEPTEMBER 10.
06:35:52PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
MOVE TO CONTINUE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 10.
06:35:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. SHELBY, WILL YOU PLEASE READ THE RULE?
06:36:05PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I AM READING FROM COUNCIL RULES 6-J-3.
STATES AS FOLLOWS.
MOVE THE REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE BY THE APPLICANT/PETITIONER
SHALL BE GRANTED AT A QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING AFTER
THE APPLICANT-PETITIONER HAS COMPLETED HIS PRESENTATON
UNLESS UPON DETERMINATION BY CITY COUNCIL THAT IS NECESSARY
FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS.
06:36:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I ASK --
06:36:37PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. CARLSON.
06:36:38PM >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I ASK LEGAL?
WHO IS HERE FROM LEGAL.
SUSAN?
SO, IF IT IS CONTINUED, THEY CAN'T CHANGE THE -- THE USE
THIS THEY ARE ASKING FOR.
THEY CAN'T CHANGE FROM CI AND SOMETHING ELSE.
AND THEN THE SECOND QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW ON ALCOHOL, WE
THINK LIMIT THE HOURS AND LIMIT OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED SOUND.
NO WAY THAT WHEN HE COMES BACK, HE CAN SAY WE ARE NOT
GOING TO APPLY FOR THE S-1?
06:37:12PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ WITH THE LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
I WILL LET MISS DOCK ANSWER THE QUESTION IF THEY CAN CHANGE
THE CATEGORY.
I THINK THAT IS POSSIBLE UNDER THE PROCEDURES THAT STAFF
FOLLOWS WITH RESPECT TO REZONING ACTIONS.
AS FAR AS YOUR SECOND QUESTION.
IF THE APPLICANT CONTINUES TO SEEK A CI ZONING OR ANY OTHER
EUCLIDIAN ZONING CATEGORY, THEN THE NATURE OF THAT TYPE OF
ZONING DISTRICT IS THAT THE USE -- USES THAT ARE IN THE USE
TABLE THAT MISS DOCK RAN THROUGH EARLIER THIS HEARING WOULD
BE USES THAT ARE AVAILABLE -- ANY OF THOSE USES WILL BE
AVAILABLE TO THE APPLICANT, AS A PERMITTED USE OR -- OR THEY
ARE ABLE TO APPLY FOR A SPECIAL USE.
ANY USE IS ALLOWED UNDER THAT KEPT AS WELL.
06:37:58PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IF WE VOTE TO PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION IN THIS
CASE TO ALLOW A CONTINUANCE, I WILL JUST ASK THAT YOU ALL
TALK, TALK -- OUT OF A WHOLE LIST OF USES ONE USE THAT THE
NEIGHBORHOOD IS CONCERNED ABOUT, AND SOUNDS LIKE THEY DON'T
INTEND TO DO THAT ANYWAY.
IF THERE IS ANY WAY TO CODIFY THAT IN THE APPLICATION WHEN
THEY COME BACK, THAT WILL BE HELPFUL.
06:38:20PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
SO LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION.
DURING THIS TIME OF CONTINUANCE, IF IT IS GRANTED, SINCE THE
APPLICATION IS FOR A REQUEST FOR A COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE
ZONING.
THAT REQUEST WERE TO CHANGE, THEN THE APPLICANT WOULD GO
BACK TO -- WE HAVE TO RENOTICE THE PROPERTY, AND WE WOULD
LIKELY HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR THIS TO BE CONSIDERED
AS YET ANOTHER FIRST READING. THIS WILL BE A CONTINUANCE OF
A FIRST READING FOR THIS.
06:38:54PM >>BILL CARLSON:
WHAT IS SIMILAR CATEGORY THAT DOESN'T
INCLUDE PARKING?
06:38:59PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO REQUEST A PD, A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND THEN SPECIFY THE USE THROUGH
THAT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL.
06:39:08PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ANYWAY, IF WE GRANT THAT, YOU GUYS CAN WORK
THAT OUT.
SEEMS LIKE THERE IS ONE NARROW CONCERN.
SO HE HAS ALREADY STATED THAT THE -- KIND OF THEORETICAL
INTENTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS NOT FOR THAT CATEGORY.
SO IF THERE IS SOME WAY THAT CAN BE HANDLED.
SO ANYWAY, I SECONDED THE MOTION.
06:39:33PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
IN ADDITION, IF I MAY, THIS REQUEST IS TO
CONTINUE SEPTEMBER 10.
WILL NEED TO RENOTICE THE PUBLIC AGAIN.
06:39:43PM >> WE AGREE, RENOTICING.
06:39:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MISS DOCK, DON'T GO FAR.
WE SEE IN THE SUBMISSIONS THAT ONE OF THE PERSONS FROM
PUBLIC COMMENT, THERE WAS IS A CODE ENFORCEMENT RECORD ON
THIS PROPERTY.
HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THIS REQUEST?
06:40:00PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
WHAT I SAW WAS THE ACMP RECORD, WHICH A
COMPLAINT RECORD.
THAT MEANS A COMPLAINT WAS FILED.
IT IS UNDER INVESTIGATION.
THE APPLICANT LIKELY AS A RESULT SUBMITTED FOR REZONING.
BUT IT HAS NOT YET BEEN OPEN AS A VIOLATION.
A CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION CASE.
06:40:25PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WOULD IT AFFECT THIS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER?
06:40:30PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
IT WILL NOT.
THE APPLICANT CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS REZONING.
AND LIKELY WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THIS REZONING WAS APPROVED
IT WOULD CLOSE THIS OUT COMPLETELY AND NOT TURN INTO A
VIOLATION.
06:40:40PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANYTHING THAT THE APPLICANT CAN TO DO
RESTRICT USAGE WITH THIS APPLICATION PERIOD?
THIS APPLICATION THAT IS PENDING TODAY, EITHER IF CONTINUED
OR NOT, IS THE APPLICANT-- ANYTHING TO RESTRICT THE USAGE?
06:40:58PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
ANOTHER NOT.
NOT WITH THE REQUEST OF A CE EUCLIDIAN DISTRICT.
EUCLIDIAN ZONING DISTRICT WE CAN NOT CONDITION.
06:41:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SUSAN, YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING ON THE
RECORD?
06:41:10PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
I WILL SAY IN RESPONSE MR. CARLSON'S QUESTION, ANY OF THE
USES UNDER THE TABLE POTENTIAL USES ONCE IT IS FULLY
ZONED CE OR SPECIAL USE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF THOSE
USES.
06:41:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT WILL NOT CHANGE BETWEEN NOW AND
SEPTEMBER.
06:41:31PM >> I THINK THAT IS QUESTION FOR ME.
THAT COULD CHANGE.
06:41:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HOW WOULD IT CHANGE?
06:41:36PM >> I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE OWNERS.
I AM JUST SAYING THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES THAT IT COULD
CHANGE.
06:41:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU HAVE BEEN IN THIS BUSINESS A LOT
LONGER.
IF JUST A CONTINUATION AND NOT A NEW APPLICATION, WHAT COULD
CHANGE?
06:41:50PM >> FIRST, WE HAVE TO RENOTICE.
IF WE RENOTICE, TYPE OF REQUEST WOULD -- COULD CHANGE.
06:41:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT WOULD BE A NEW APPLICATION.
06:41:57PM >> NO, WE CAN AMEND THIS ACTION.
06:42:00PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SO -- LACHONE, WHAT ARE THE POSSIBILITIES?
06:42:05PM >>BILL CARLSON:
GAVE THE EXAMPLE OF A PD.
06:42:07PM >> COULD AMEND IT TO A PD.
I AM NOT SPEAKING AS COMMITMENT FOR THE OWNER BUS
POSSIBILITIES OF MAKING THIS MORE PALPABLE.
06:42:18PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS REQUEST FOR A PD REQUIRED A DRC MEETING AND THEN COME
BACK BEFORE COUNCIL.
I CAN ESTABLISH DEADLINES TO KEEP THEM ON TRACK FOR THE
SETTLEMENT 10 HEARING DATE AND THEY MAY NEED UNTIL OCTOBER
TO CONVERT IT TO A PD.
06:42:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MY QUESTION TO COUNCIL WOULD BE IN LIGHT
OF THE COUNCIL RULE, THE RULE IS JUST FOR DUE PROCESS.
WHAT IS THE NEXUS BETWEEN WHAT WE ARE HEARING TONIGHT AND
DUE PROCESS?
SO WHAT -- WHAT DUE PROCESS IS BEING DENIED THE APPLICANT.
06:43:04PM >> COULD I EXPLAIN WHAT THE ISSUE IS REGARDING DUE PROCESS.
HAS TO DO WITH NOT KNOWING THERE WERE ISSUES RELATED TO
OBJECTIONS WITH PARKING.
YOU HAVE TWO NOTICES THAT GO OUT, OKAY, YOU HAVE A FILING
NOTICE, AND YOU HAVE A NOTICE OF A HEARING.
IF YOU DON'T RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATION FROM SOMEONE ELSE
SAYING, HEY, WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS, WITH THE INITIAL
ISSUE WAS FOR TWO NOTICES, IT WAS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE AMPLE
TIME TO NOTIFY THE PETITIONER THAT THERE WERE ISSUES.
IF THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN, AND AUTOMATIC ONLY LEARNING ABOUT
THAT TONIGHT --
06:43:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, MR. MICHELINI, EVEN
THOUGH YOU ARE THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE HERE TONIGHT,
CLEARLY THE APPLICANT UNDERSTOOD -- HE HAS GOT A CODE
ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINT.
06:43:57PM >> HE HAS NOTICE.
06:44:00PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THIS IS AN APPLICANT THAT IS FULLY VESTED
IN THIS BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF TAMPA.
I WOULD ASSUME AS A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT, THEY WOULD BE
AWARE OF WHAT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR THE CITY OF
TAMPA TO PROVIDE SEMI TRACTOR-TRAILER PARKING IN AN OVERLAY
DISTRICT.
I MEAN, WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT JUST A -- SOMEONE WHO IS A
-- YOU KNOW, A ONE-OFF TYPE OF PERSON.
THIS IS THEIR BUSINESS.
THEY ARE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT DOING TRACTOR-TRAILER
PARKING.
SAYING THEY ARE NOT AWARE THERE IS GAMBLING IN THIS
ESTABLISHMENT IS DISINGENUOUS.
06:44:36PM >> ALL I AM SAYING I ACCEPT THE ADMONISHMENT.
WHAT I AM ASKING FOR IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
ONLY WAY I CAN GET THAT IF YOU ALLOW THAT TO MOVE FORWARD.
ACCEPT THE TIME RESTRICTION OF SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER SO WE
CAN COME BACK AND FIGURE OUT HOW TO RESOLVE THE ONE STICKING
POINT THAT SEEMS TO BE THE MAJOR ISSUE HERE.
THEY DON'T HAVE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PLANS, BUT IF THAT
RESTRICTION CAN BE HANDLED THROUGH A PD AND OTHER MECHANISM,
I AM WILLING TO EXPLORE THAT.
06:45:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I CAN SUGGEST YOU CAN UNIFY THE PROPERTY
WITH RM-24.
06:45:14PM >> NO, SIR, I DON'T THINK THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
06:45:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU ARE CONCERNED OF UNIFICATION OF THE
PROPERTY.
06:45:21PM >> EVERYTHING TO THE WEST IS CI.
06:45:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
EVERYTHING TO THE EAST OF RM-24.
06:45:27PM >>BILL CARLSON:
DURING THIS TIME, YOU KNOW, SUSAN CAN CUT ME
OFF, BUT THERE ARE A FEW DIFFERENT TRACKS OF THIS.
IF WE CONTINUE AS WE ARE, WE -- IF WE CAN EITHER APPROVE IT
OR NOT APPROVE IT.
EITHER WAY, WE HAVE TO JUSTIFY OUR VOTE.
AND THEN BASED ON THAT, EITHER THE PUBLIC OR THEY CAN DECIDE
TO APPEAL AND A WHOLE LITIGATION PROCESS.
INSTEAD, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO AVOID THE WHOLE APPEAL PROCESS
BY THE WAY TWO MONTHS.
LET THEM TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT AND THEN COME BACK.
ONLY THING WE LOST IS THE 20 MINUTES OR SO THEY PRESENTED OR
30 MINUTES.
BUT WE GIVE IT A CHANCE THAT IT IS GOING TO WORK OUT AND WE
WON'T END UP IN LOTS OF FIGHTING WITH THE COMMITTEE
OBJECTING OR THE OWNER OBJECTING.
06:46:14PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
06:46:17PM >>LUIS VIERA:
LOOKING AT THIS REQUEST, I DON'T WANT TO
BUTCHER THIS THING, OUNCE OF PREVENTION IS WORTH A POUND OF
CURE.
I ALWAYS BUTCHER.
06:46:30PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THE LAND USE COROLLARY FOR THAT IS AN OUNCE
OF PROCEDURE IS WORTH A POUND OF LITIGATION.
06:46:37PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THERE YOU GO.
THAT IS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT.
THIS CONTINUANCE DOES NOT GO TO THE MERITS OF THIS CASE.
I CERTAINLY HAVE MY VIEWS UPON HEARING WHAT I HAVE BEEN
HEARING AND I THINK WE ALL DO HERE -- I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK
FOR EVERYBODY, BUT I KNOW I CERTAINLY DO.
BUT I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON'S POINTS ARE VERY WELL
TAKEN WHICH IS IF WE DENY THIS REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE
WITH A CLAIM OF DUE PROCESS CHALLENGE THAT THERE IS GOING TO
BE SOME DEPRIVATION OF SOME PROPERTY INTEREST OR WHAT HAVE
YOU HERE.
THAT TAMPA CITY COUNCIL WILL HAVE A ROLE FOR THIS PROPERTY
OWNER AND COULD ULTIMATELY RESULT IN A SEQUEL TO ANY
POTENTIAL DENIAL IF COUNCIL CHOOSES TO GO THAT WAY WHICH MAY
NOT BE FAVORABLE TO FOLKS WHO WOULD WANT THAT DENIAL.
SO, YEAH, I MEAN I AM PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUANCE
FOR THOSE REASONS.
IT DOESN'T GO TO THE MERIT OF THAT CASE WHATSOEVER.
IT MORE SO GOES TO TRYING TO DO THIS THING PROCEDURALLY
RIGHT.
AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT.
BECAUSE, AGAIN, IF WE DON'T DO IT RIGHT NOW AND WE
ULTIMATELY END UP DENYING IT, THERE IS GOING TO BE SOMETHING
THAT WILL COME BACK TO HAUNT US.
I BELIEVE THAT.
06:47:50PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
06:47:52PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
LACHONE, I HAVE A QUESTION.
CAN YOU RESTATE, PLEASE, WHAT WOULD -- WITH THE CONTINUANCE
-- SO WE DON'T KNOW COMING BACK -- IF IT IS GOING TO COME
BACK AS THE SAME THING OR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE ALLOWING THE CONTINUANCE FOR.
06:48:13PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AT THIS POINT, IF THE CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED, THE APPLICANT
COULD COME BACK WITH THE SAME REQUEST, WHICH WOULD BE THE
REQUEST FOR CI ZONING.
MAYBE IN THAT TIME, HE HAS MET -- SPOKE WITH THE NEIGHBORS
AND THEN HAS ACTUALLY CONDUCTED WHAT HE IS GOING TO DO ON THE
PROPERTY, AS FAR AS CLEARING THE PROPERTY.
OR THE APPLICANT COULD DECIDE THEY ARE GOING TO AMEND THAT
REQUEST, THE REZONING REQUEST, AND MAYBE IT WOULD BE A PD OR
A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A SITE PLAN.
AND BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAS TO DO NOTICE, THEY HAVE TO
DECIDE BEFORE IT IS TIME TO NOTICE THE HEARING.
SO THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE NOTICE 30 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING
AT LEAST.
SO BY MID-AUGUST, THEY WOULD KNOW -- THEY WILL HAVE TO
DECIDE LONG BEFORE THEN THE ROUTE IT WOULD TAKE.
06:49:07PM >> I THINK WITH ALL OF THOSE OPTIONS BEING CONSIDERED, WE
WOULD GO TO OCTOBER, AND NOT SEPTEMBER.
06:49:12PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
AND JUST ONE MORE QUESTION.
HE WAS LOOKING OVER THE -- THE PERMITTED USES FOR CI.
I KNOW YOU WENT THROUGH A FEW OF THEM.
THIS IS A HELIPORT?
06:49:34PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES.
06:49:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SEE, IT IS NOT JUST ONE USE.
06:49:38PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, A HELIPORT.
IT IS ALLOWED IN CI AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES, INDUSTRIAL GENERAL
AND INDUSTRIAL HEAVY ZONES.
06:49:52PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
OKAY, THANK YOU.
06:49:54PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
YOU ARE WELCOME.
06:49:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ONE LAST QUESTION AND THIS IS FOR OUR
ATTORNEY AND OUR COUNCIL ATTORNEY BOTH.
THERE HAS BEEN INSINUATION THERE IS A DUE PROCESS ISSUE WITH
THIS HEARING.
HAVE YOU IN YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION, HAVE YOU BEEN ABLE TO
IDENTIFY ANY DUE PROCESS CONCERNS?
I AM ASKING BOTH OF YOU.
YOU CAN PICK WHICH ONE GOES FIRST.
ARM WRESTLE IF YOU WOULD LIKE.
06:50:24PM >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ:
I MEAN, I THINK -- SUSAN
JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
MR. MICHELINI HAS DISCUSSED, YOU KNOW, HIS DIFFICULTY WITH
REVIEWING THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL, THAT
HE HAD LIMITED TIME TO REVIEW IN ORDER TO RESPOND TO AT THIS
TIME.
06:50:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
I DON'T NEED TO HEAR FROM YOU, THAT IS ENOUGH FOR ME.
OKAY.
06:50:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. MICHELINI, WOULD YOU PREFER AN OCTOBER
DATE?
06:51:00PM >> THAT WOULD BE A SAFER DATE.
06:51:01PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT DATE WOULD THAT BE?
06:51:03PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
OCTOBER 8, 2026.
06:51:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MAKER OF THE MOTION.
PLEASE MAKE A NEW MOTION.
06:51:12PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO
CONTINUE ITEM REZ 26-36 TO OCTOBER 8, 5:01 P.M., 315 EAST
KENNEDY BOULEVARDS, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602.
06:51:28PM >> REQUIRING RENOTICE AND WAIVING 180 DAY DAYS.
06:51:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO.
SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA.
06:51:39PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I WANTED TO JUST FOR THOSE CAME HERE THIS EVENING.
NOT SOMETHING WE TAKE LIGHTLY BECAUSE YOU WAITED FOR A
WHILE.
THERE ARE PROCEDURAL ISSUES IF WE TURN THIS THING THE OTHER
WAY, IT COULD POTENTIALLY GO THE OTHER WAY.
IF WE DON'T ADHERE TO PROPER PROCEDURE.
I KNOW WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE FINE ATTORNEY IN THE AUDIENCE
AND PROCEDURE IS IMPORTANT.
SO, AGAIN, THAT IS MY RATIONALE.
THANK YOU.
06:52:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
FOLKS IN THE AUDIENCE ON THIS AS WELL.
YOU PROBABLY HEARD MY VOICE.
I WILL END UP SUPPORTING THE CONTINUANCE BASED ON THE
INFORMATION -- ONLY BASED ON THE INFORMATION WE HAVE GOT
FROM OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO ENSURE THAT OUR CASE IS STRONG AND
CAN BE UPHELD.
SO IF THEY PRESENT THE SAME CASE IN OCTOBER, PLEASE COME
BACK, AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT THIS AGAIN.
AND, HOPEFULLY, IT COMES BACK WITH A BETTER CASE.
I UNFORTUNATELY AT THIS POINT, WE WON'T BE TAKING ANY
FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS.
I DON'T KNOW, DO I NEED TO --
06:52:41PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
NO, SIR.
06:52:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I DIDN'T THINK SO.
MAKING SURE.
CHECKING MYSELF.
I DIDN'T THINK SO.
WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
OPPOSED.
OKAY.
06:52:53PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
06:52:54PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
6:52:55PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU HAVE TO ANNOUNCE THAT, MADAM CLERK?
DID YOU ANNOUNCE THE VOTE?
6:53:00PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
6:53:04PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THANK YOU.
6:53:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU GUYS FOR TURNING OUT.
THANK YOU.
WE'RE MOVING ON TO -- LET'S GIVE THEM A SECOND TO FINISH
THIS AND THEN WE'LL --
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 4.
6:53:27PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM 4 IS REZ 26-46.
IT IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 3705 NORTH DARWIN AVENUE FROM RS
50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES.

I'LL TURN IT OVER NOW TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
6:53:54PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,
TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE, TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND
EVACUATION ZONE D.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE NORTH AND
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
DIRECTLY TO THE WEST IS TAYLOR PARK, AND TO THE SOUTH IS
WOODLAWN CEMETERY.
NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR, IS SIX
BLOCKS TO THE EAST OF THE SITE.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE SUBJECT
SITE.
AGAIN, OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION IS TO THE NORTH, EAST, AND
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
ALL OF THIS GREEN IS THE RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE, AND
THAT IS THE PARK AND THE CEMETERY.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERNS ALONG NORTH DARWIN AVENUE WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 10
DESIGNATION.
ALONG THE SEGMENT BETWEEN WEST INDIANA AVENUE AND WEST
VIRGINIA AVENUE, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, 15 PARCELS
REFLECT AN EXISTING DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY 5.79 DWELLING

UNITS PER ACRE.
AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALLOW TWO DWELLING UNITS
ON THE SUBJECT SITE RESULTING IN A DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY
6.45 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE DENSITY IS COMPARABLE TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN, AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED
UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION.
ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPOSED 49-FOOT WIDE LOTS ARE COMPARABLE
TO THE LOT WIDTHS ALONG THE BLOCK AND PROPOSED UNIT HEIGHTS
OF 35 FEET ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT.
AND THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN
VILLAGE WHERE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES ENHANCED
URBAN DESIGN THAT PROMOTES A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN AND RESIDENTIAL DENSITY SUPPORTIVE OF TRANSIT USE AS
SUCH.
THE REQUEST PROPOSES A SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH DARWIN AVENUE
WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE CURRENTLY ABSENT.
ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT PROPOSES VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM NORTH
DARWIN AVENUE, ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY WOULD BE MORE
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GUIDANCE, WHICH
ENCOURAGES THE USE OF ALLEYS TO PRESERVE THE ESTABLISHED
CHARACTER OF TAMPA'S TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOODS.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES RELATED TO HOUSING THE

CITY'S POPULATION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND ENSURES
AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST
SHARE OF GROWTH TO URBAN VILLAGES.
THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE
SURROUNDING USES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
6:56:37PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
SEEING NONE, NEXT.
6:56:57PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER
DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
WE'LL START WITH HAVING A LOOK AT THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT
SITE.
IT IS OUTLINED IN RED.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH
DARWIN AVENUE.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACE IS LOCATED
SOUTH OF WEST VIRGINIA AVENUE AND NORTH OF WEST INDIANA
AVENUE.
SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST IS
ALL RS 50.

THE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS TO
THE NORTH, TO THE EAST AND TO THE SOUTH.
AND THEN WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THE SUAREZ SPORTS
COMPLEX.
WE DO HAVE A SITE PLAN FROM THE APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS EACH ON LOTS 49 FEET IN WIDTH AND 141
FEET IN DEPTH.
EACH DWELLING UNIT IS PROPOSED WITH TWO-CAR GARAGE AND THE
FRONT DOORS FOR THE -- EACH DWELLING UNIT IS ORIENTED TO
NORTH DARWIN AVENUE.
THE MAX HEIGHT PROPOSED WOULD BE 35 FEET.
WE HAVE AERIALS FOR PARCEL A.
THIS IS THE PARCEL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY.
AND THEN WE HAVE PARCEL B.
THERE ARE NO WAIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
WE DO HAVE SOME SITE PHOTOS TO SHOW.
HAVE A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT LOT.
NORTH DARWIN LOOKING EAST.
IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
TWO PHOTOS FOR EAST.
AND THEN, OF COURSE, LOOKING WEST AT THE SPORTS COMPLEX.

ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS WOULD BE LOOKING NORTH ON NORTH DARWIN AND LOOKING
SOUTH ON NORTH DARWIN.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF, WE REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION.
WE DO FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE
OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION, FURTHER
MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN WOULD NEED TO BE COMPLETED
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE AS STATED
ON THE REVISION SHEET.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
6:59:37PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, APPLICANT?
6:59:47PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
DOMAIN HOMES.
3104 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE, SUITE 2, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33607.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
I APPRECIATE STAFF'S HELP WITH THE REZONE.
I'M HERE WITH ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
IF YOU'D LIKE, I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
ALSO, I KNOW THERE WAS A QUESTION MENTIONED EARLIER ABOUT
THE ALLEY.
WE DEFERRED TO NATURAL RESOURCES BECAUSE THE GRAND LIVE OAK

ON THE BACK OF THAT PROPERTY, TO DEFER TO USE THE FRONT OF
THE PROPERTY FOR LOADING.
THAT'S PICTURED THERE.
TEN-FOOT ALLEY.
WE WERE ADVISED TO STAY CLEAR OF THAT TREE.
SO WE'RE DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO PROTECT THAT.
7:00:36PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS
ITEM?
CAN I GET A MOTION?
YES, MA'AM.
START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
7:00:59PM >> HI.
MY NAME IS NICOLE PETERIKA.
I'M AGAIN COMING TO YOU TONIGHT FROM THE TAMPA HEIGHTS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SPECIFICALLY OUR LAND USE COMMITTEE.
WE DISCUSSED THIS A COUPLE OF TIMES.
OUR FIRST DISCUSSION WAS AROUND A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM
OUR BOARD.
AND THEN WE SORT OF CHANGED POSITION TO WE WANTED TO OPPOSE.
THE REASON BEING THAT WE AS A COMMUNITY WANT TO ENCOURAGE
AND REALLY PROMOTE THE USE OF ALLEYS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
SO WE WOULD REALLY PREFER THE DESIGN TO LOOK AT A WAY TO USE
THAT ALLEY.
I UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE WITH THE TREE AND, OF COURSE, I

SUPPORT KEEPING AS MUCH TREE CANOPY AS POSSIBLE AS WELL.
SO, AGAIN, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, I WOULD ENCOURAGE DOMAIN TO
REACH OUT TO THE ASSOCIATION AND DISCUSS DESIGN
OPPORTUNITIES WHERE -- I JUST SAW AN EXAMPLE THE OTHER DAY,
ACTUALLY, IN SOUTH TAMPA OF A HOUSE WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE,
FRONT ACCESS, WITH A PORTE-COCHERE AND A RECESSED GARAGE.
IT'S NOT FRONT LOADED.
BUT I DIGRESS.
BACK TO THE ASSOCIATION'S POSITION, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO
ENCOURAGE STREET PARKING WHEN WE HAVE THESE CURB CUTS FOR
DRIVEWAYS, FOR FRONT LOADED GARAGES, WE TAKE AWAY FROM
STREET PARKING.
ADD A BALLPARK, THAT BECOMES AN ISSUE, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
ACTIVE THE PARK IS, BUT IF YOU'VE GOT LITTLE LEAGUE OR
WHATNOT USING THE PARK, WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE THAT STREET
PARKING.
SO I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE THEM TO CONSIDER REACHING OUT TO
THE ASSOCIATION AND MAYBE CONSIDER SOME DIFFERENT DESIGN
OPPORTUNITIES.
THANK YOU.
7:02:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
CAN I GET A MOTION?
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
DO YOU WANT REBUTTAL?

7:02:55PM >> YEAH, JUST BRIEFLY.
I APPRECIATE THE ASSOCIATION'S INPUT.
FIRST I HEARD ABOUT THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ALLEY USE.
I DID BRING A PICTURE OF THE ALLEY I TOOK TODAY.
YOU SEE THE GRAND LIVE OAK THERE.
WE WERE ASKED NOT TO DISTURB.
I'M AWARE THE TEN FOOT ALLEY IS BEING USED SOME.
THAT IS A PICTURE LOOKING TOWARDS THE SOUTH.
THIS IS LOOKING TOWARDS THE NORTH.
REALLY IS IMPASSABLE THE WAY IT IS.
LIKE I SAID, WE USE ALLEYS ALL THE TIME, BUT IN THIS
INSTANCE, WE JUST DEFER TO THE PROFESSIONALS TO PROTECT THAT
GRAND LIVE OAK AND WE'RE JUST TRYING TO DO THE BEST THING WE
CAN TO DO THAT.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO SPEAK TO ANYONE IN THE ASSOCIATION THAT
WANTS TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS.
BY THE WAY, TO ADD TO THAT, AND I UNDERSTAND THE PARKING
CONCERNS, THESE HOUSES ARE SET BACK, THE NORTH IS SET BACK,
AND EXCUSE ME FOR LOOKING CLOSE TO THIS.
OVER 20 FEET ON THAT DRIVEWAY TO THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH IS
-- EACH ALLOWS FOR FOUR CARS TO BE PARKED WITHOUT GETTING
INTO A SIDEWALK, WHICH I TRY HARD TO DO BECAUSE I DO THE
SITE PLAN.
I WANT TO KEEP THE CARS OFF THE SIDEWALKS AS WELL.
BUT I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

7:04:13PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE APPLICANT?
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
7:04:18PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
CAN YOU PUT THE FIRST PICTURE UP THAT HAS THE
TREE WITH THE ALLEY?
7:04:26PM >> THE FIRST ONE LOOKING SOUTH.
AND THAT'S A -- LOOKING FROM THE PROPERTY SOUTH.
THIS IS LOOKING FROM THE PROPERTY NORTH.
ONCE AGAIN ONLY A TEN FOOT ALLEY.
TWO CARS COULDN'T PASS ON IT.
WITH THE NORTH SIDE NOT BEING USED, THAT'S GOING TO BE AN
ISSUE AT SOME POINT WITH TWO CARS.
SOMEONE HAS TO CHOOSE WHETHER THEY ARE GOING -- WHO IS GOING
TO WIN BECAUSE THE ALLEYS AREN'T MARKED ONE WAY AND THOSE
KINDS OF THINGS I'M SURE YOU HAVE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE.
WE DEFER TO NATURAL RESOURCES ON NOT TRYING TO PUT ANY MORE
THINGS AROUND THAT TREE, SO WE DECIDED TO FRONT LOAD IT FOR
THAT REASON.
STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT.
7:05:08PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
FOR STAFF, WOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED AN ALLEY
THAT YOU CAN'T USE?
7:05:25PM >> JONATHAN SCOTT, MOBILITY.
THAT ALLEY WITH THE TREE AND STUFF, IT'S TRICKY.
TO SAY THAT IT'S NOT USED IS PROBABLY NOT ACCURATE.
IT LOOKS LIKE PEOPLE ARE USING IT.
IT'S AN OPEN ALLEY.

IT'S REALLY JUST KIND OF PROTECTING THE TREE.
TO MAKE THEM DO SOMETHING TO THE TREE, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S
WORTH IT, IN THIS CASE.
BUT IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS USED.
7:06:05PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
I JUST ASK, WE TALKED ABOUT ALLEYS A LOT.
I WOULD REALLY LOVE FOR US TO FIGURE OUT THIS ALLEY
SITUATION.
I'M SURE IT WILL BE --
7:06:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE'RE WORKING ON IT.
7:06:17PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
-- AT SOME POINT.
THIS HAS COME UP SO MANY TIMES.
IT'S OBVIOUS THAT WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT, CAN THEY BE USED?
CAN THEY NOT?
IT'S BEEN COMING UP QUITE A LOT IN CONVERSATIONS.
I LOOK FORWARD TO THE DAY WHEN WE CAN SAY YES, NO, WHATEVER
THE CASE MAY BE, BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE YOU CAN DRIVE THROUGH
IT TO ME.
7:06:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILMAN CARLSON AND THEN COUNCILMAN
VIERA.
7:06:48PM >>BILL CARLSON:
BEFORE YOU LEAVE, HE WAS TALKING ABOUT IF
YOU HAD THE GARAGES WITH THE EXITS ON THE ALLEYWAY, IT COULD
ENDANGER THE TREE.
WOULD YOU OR NATURAL RESOURCES AGREE WITH THAT, THAT MAKING
THE HOMES ACCESSIBLE FROM THE BACK WOULD ENDANGER THE TREE
IN SOME WAY OR CROWD THE TREE OUT?

7:07:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
JOE?
7:07:22PM >> JOSEPH CERMAK, FORESTER EXAMINER.
YEAH, GIVEN THE SPACING --
7:07:39PM >> THAT'S KIND OF A WIDE SHOT.
[INDISCERNIBLE]
7:07:50PM >> IT WOULD REALLY BE A QUESTION OF IN DEVELOPING THE ALLEY,
COULD THEY POSSIBLY USE THE MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE SAFE,
THEY WOULD STILL BE ENCROACHING CLOSER THAN THEY WOULD LIKE
TO SEE WITH ANY KIND OF PERMEABLE ON GRADE, IF THAT WAS EVEN
AN AVAILABLE OPTION.
ALSO WOULD BRING THE FACT THAT THEY WOULD BE PUTTING
DRIVEWAYS UP THE TWO SIDES.
IN THE REAR OF THE LOT, DRIVEWAYS OFF EITHER SIDE WHILE THEY
COULD REMAIN CLEAR OF THE TREE, THEY WOULD INVOLVE HAVING TO
DO SOME PRUNING AND OTHER IMPACTS TO THE TREE.
7:08:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IS THAT A LIVE OAK?
7:08:36PM >> IT IS.
GRAND LIVE OAK.
46 INCHES, I BELIEVE.
7:08:40PM >> RIGHT.
AND THE C-7 RATING THAT THAT ONE WAS GIVEN, I THINK IT WAS
OF -- NUMBER 22.
46-INCH.
THIS WAS DONE LAST YEAR.
IT'S ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE.

7:09:22PM >> I WAS LOOKING AT THE GRAND TREE TABLE THERE.
THE ONE ON THE LEFT.
THAT IS SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THAT TREE AS A C-7.
THAT IS PRESERVATION QUALITY.
YEAH, I WOULD SAY THAT IN THIS CASE, ASKING TO USE PARKING
IN THE FRONT RATHER THAN HAVING TO IMPROVE THE ALLEY WOULD
BE TO THE BENEFIT OF THAT TREE.
STRICTLY SAID THAT IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL.
CAN'T BE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN.
7:09:59PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
IS THAT IT?
ARE WE GOOD?
CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
7:10:18PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN.
I READ AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 3705 NORTH DARWIN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM

ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50 RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY, TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7:10:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA,
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
7:10:48PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 16, 2026,
AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY
BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
7:11:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
VERY GOOD.
THE NEXT ONES WE'RE GOING TO FLY THROUGH, RIGHT?
THIS IS GOING TO BE RECORD TIME ON ITEMS 5, 6, 7, AND 8.
LET'S GO, 5.
7:11:14PM >> BRIA DIXON, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
REZ 26-51, REQUEST TO REZONE 9710 AND 9720 NORTH ARMENIA
AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO CN COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD.
TURNING IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION.
7:11:36PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING
DISTRICT, THE HISTORIC FOREST HILLS AND IS NOT WITHIN AN

EVACUATION ZONE.
THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE, OUTLINED HERE IN
PURPLE.
THIS BLUE LINE IS THE JURISDICTIONAL LINE BETWEEN THE CITY
OF TAMPA AND THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY.
TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ARE ALSO COMMERCIAL USES THAT
CONTINUE TOWARDS LINEBAUGH AVENUE.
TO THE EAST IS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND TO THE WEST AND
SOUTH ARE A MIX OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY USES.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT IS REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, WHICH
DOES EXTEND GOING THIS WAY AND THEN JUMPS TO R-10 AND THEN
TO CMU 35 ALONG LINEBAUGH, CLOSER TO NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE.
AND THE RESIDENTIAL 20 IS ALSO TO THE SOUTH.
RESIDENTIAL 10 IS TO THE EAST.
THIS YELLOW COLOR IS THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
RESIDENTIAL 4 DESIGNATION.
THE PROPOSED CN DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED WITH THE R-20
DESIGNATION GIVEN THE SITE THAT IS ALREADY ZONED RO-1.
THE SITE DOES NOT HAVE TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA OUTLINED
IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND
ENCOURAGES COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT ENHANCES THE CITY'S
CHARACTER AND AMBIENCE.

THE PLAN REQUIRES NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO CONNECT
BUILDING ENTRANCES TO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND ENCOURAGES
SIDEWALKS IN AREAS WHERE IT IS PRACTICAL AND FEASIBLE.
TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH POLICY DIRECTION, FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT SHOULD PROMOTE USES IN CONTEXT WITH THE
COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE BY ORIENTING
PROPOSED BUILDINGS TO THE STREET AND PLACING PARKING IN THE
REAR.
ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIRES ANY COMMERCIAL
USES TO BE BUFFERED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHOULD BE SENSITIVE TO THE
RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE WEST OF THE SITE.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES RELATED TO THE GROWING
NEED FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA,
AND PROMOTES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH TAMPA'S
CHARACTER AND ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY.
OVERALL, THE REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING AREA AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
7:13:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, NEXT.
7:14:03PM >>BRIA DIXON:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL.

SUBJECT PARCEL IS HERE OUTLINED IN RED.
YOU CAN SEE THAT IT HAS -- UPSIDE DOWN.
YOU CAN SEE THAT IT HAS FRONTAGES HERE ON ARMENIA AVENUE.
THIS SAYS BARCLAY RIGHT HERE AS WELL AS TIFFANY OAKS.
I ALSO HAVE PHOTOS.
THIS IS THE SURVEY OF THE PARCEL OUTLINED HERE IN RED.
IT IS A FAIRLY LARGE PARCEL.
IT'S ALMOST APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE AT .94 ACRES.
IT MEETS THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENT FOR THE CN COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING.
CN ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH RESIDENTIAL R-20 FUTURE LAND
USE DESIGNATION THEREFORE ALSO IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
SURROUNDING AREA.
I ALSO HAVE PHOTOS.
THIS IS THE SUBJECT PARCEL.
HERE IT IS AGAIN.
THIS IS ONE OF THE TWO BUILDINGS.
THIS IS NORTH.
EAST.
SECOND PART TO THE EAST.
ONE OF THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH.
AND THIS IS ONE WEST VIEW AS WELL AS MULTIFAMILY VIEW.
AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF AGAIN FIND
THIS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
7:15:40PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, APPLICANT.
7:15:50PM >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME
IS TU MAI.
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 14031 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY, TAMPA,
FLORIDA, 33618.
I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT, FRANK CHILLURA, WHO IS
HERE TONIGHT ALONG WITH HIS FAMILY.
SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH
ARMENIA AVENUE AND WEST BARCLAY ROAD.
TOTAL LAND 0.94 ACRES.
CURRENT ZONING IS RO 1 WITH FUTURE LAND USE RES 20.
EXISTING WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE IS PROVIDED BY THE
CITY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM RO-1 TO CN TO
ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WITH COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD USES.
THERE ARE TWO ONE-STORY BUILDINGS ON THE SUBJECT SITE THAT
SERVE AS BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE.
INGRESS AND EGRESS ON TIFFANY OAKS LANE AND WEST BARCLAY
SERVE AS A DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE.
THIS REQUEST IS SIMPLY TO ADD NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
COMMERCIAL USES SUCH AS A SANDWICH SHOP FOR THE SUBJECT SITE
FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE HISTORIC FOREST HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD.

THE PROPOSED CN ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT MEETS LAND USE OBJECTIVE 9.3, POLICY 9.3.1, OBJECTIVE
15.2, POLICY 15.2.1 FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND
COMMERCIAL AREAS OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
WE RECEIVED NO OBJECTIONS FROM THE NEIGHBORS.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FINDS THIS REZONING
CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THIS REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH
THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THANK YOU TO THE STAFF FOR THEIR STAFF REPORT AND FINDINGS,
AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE COUNCIL'S APPROVAL.
7:17:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT?
HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS
ITEM?
CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
7:18:11PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
FILE REZ-26-51, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 9710 AND 9720 NORTH ARMENIA

AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
RO-1, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, TO CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD,
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7:18:32PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
7:18:39PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 16, 2026 AT
10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY
BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
7:18:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
ITEM NUMBER 6.
7:18:58PM >>BRIA DIXON:
BRIA DIXON, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM 6 IS REZ-26-53, REQUEST TO REZONE 3817 AND 3819
TEMPLE STREET FROM RM 16 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND CG
COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY 18.
I WILL NOW TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
7:19:22PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT.
THE GRANT PARK NEIGHBORHOOD, THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE
AND EVACUATION ZONE E.

THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS OUTLINED IN
PURPLE.
AGAIN THE BLUE LINE IS THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN
UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TAMPA.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND INDUSTRIAL USES.
THE COMMERCIAL PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL USES ARE CONCENTRATED
ALONG THE TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR OF NORTH 50th STREET
AND ALSO EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD.
SOUTH AND EAST ARE PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE.
IT'S LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, WHICH IS TO
THE NORTH, EAST, AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
TO THE WEST, THIS RED COLOR IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35
DISTRICT.
IN THE PINK ON THE CITY OF TAMPA SIDE IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED
USE 35.
ON THE COUNTY SIDE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 12.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN ALONG TEMPLE STREET BETWEEN EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER
KING JR. BOULEVARD AND EAST 32nd AVENUE.
EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE AND VACANT PARCELS, THE AREA
REFLECTS AN EXISTING DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY 10.94 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE.
THE PROPOSED PD WOULD ALLOW UP TO FOUR DWELLING UNITS

RESULTING IN A POTENTIAL DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY 16.66
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
WHILE IT EXCEEDS THE EXISTING DENSITY ALONG THIS PORTION OF
TEMPLE STREET, IT REMAINS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY
ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION AND
POLICIES ENCOURAGING ATTACHED AND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING TYPES
AT SLIGHTLY HIGHER DENSITIES IN SINGLE-FAMILY AREAS.
OVERALL THE REQUEST WOULD PROVIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES RELATED TO HOUSING THE
CITY'S POPULATION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ENSURES
AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS -- GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TOWARD
URBAN VILLAGES.
ADDITIONALLY, THE SITE IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET --
125 FEET SOUTH OF EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD
AND ONE BLOCK EAST OF NORTH 50th STREET, BOTH DESIGNATED
TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
IDENTIFIES AS APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND
INCREASED DENSITY AND INTENSITY TO SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE MODES
OF TRANSPORTATION.
LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO ORIENT FRONT ENTRANCES TOWARD

NEIGHBORHOOD, SIDEWALKS AND STREETS.
SINCE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT
APPLICABLE URBAN VILLAGE AND SITE DESIGN POLICIES SHOULD BE
ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE FOR A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS
COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE
REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
7:22:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, NEXT.
7:22:21PM >>BRIA DIXON:
BRIA DIXON, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
HERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED
AND IT ONLY HAS FRONTAGE HERE ON TEMPLE STREET.
NORTH IS EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING AS WELL AS 50th TO
THE WEST.
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS DUPLEXES ARE THROUGHOUT THE AREA.
PRESENTLY BOTH OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE VACANT AND
UNDEVELOPED.
HERE WE ALSO HAVE A SURVEY WHERE THE PARCELS ARE OUTLINED
HERE IN BOLD AND TEMPLE STREET IS FRONTING ON THIS SIDE
HERE.
PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA ARE --
SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THIS IS THAT SECOND PARCEL.
THIS IS NORTH.
A PLACE OF ASSEMBLY.
EAST BEHIND FIRST PARCEL.
EAST BEHIND THE SECOND PARCEL.
RESIDENCE TO THE SOUTH.
COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY .24 ACRES AND MEETS THE
MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE
FAMILY RM 18 ZONING.
PROPOSED RM 18 ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
R-20 FUTURE LAND USE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION AND FIND THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
7:24:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, APPLICANT.
7:24:13PM >> JAMES LASCARA REPRESENTING THE REQUEST FOR REZ 26-53,
LOCATED AT 3817 AND 3819 TEMPLE STREET.
REQUESTING ZONING TO RM 18.
ENCOURAGED TO HEAR THE FINDINGS OF STAFF WERE CONSISTENT
ACROSS THE BOARD.
NO WAIVERS, THIS IS EUCLIDEAN REZONING.

COMMUNITY SUPPORT STRONG WITH TEN LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND NO
OPPOSITION.
AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
7:24:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS
ITEM?
HEARING NONE, CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
7:24:50PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
TAKE A STAB AT IT AND SEE WHERE IT GOES.
[ LAUGHTER ]
7:24:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HEY, THERE WILL BE NO HUMOR IN TAMPA CITY
COUNCIL TODAY.
7:24:57PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
SORRY, THIS IS A SAD PLACE.
I HAVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING
CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL
VICINITY OF 3817 AND 3819 TEMPLE STREET IN THE CITY OF
TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM 16, RESIDENTIAL,
MULTIFAMILY AND CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL,
MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
7:25:20PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN

MANISCALCO.
A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
7:25:28PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 16, 2026 AT
10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY
BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
7:25:44PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE'VE GOT TWO MORE LIGHTNING SPEED.
I EXPECT TO BE OUT OF HERE AT 7:35.
GO.
7:25:51PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM 7 IS REZ 25-86.
THIS REQUEST TO REZONE 3101 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE FROM RS 50
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 AND CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL AND TO ALLOW
FOR ALL CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES.
I'LL TURN IT OVER NOW TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
7:26:11PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
NOW, I KNOW SHE CAN READ FAST.
[ LAUGHTER ]
7:26:16PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
DIDN'T HAVE CAFFEINE TODAY.
SO I DON'T KNOW.
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.

THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT,
EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD AND
EVACUATION ZONE E.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
THERE IS A MIX OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY TO THE NORTH,
EAST, AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THEY ARE MOSTLY MOVING EAST.
AND THEN ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE ARE A CONCENTRATION OF
COMMERCIAL USES WITH PUBLIC, QUASI-PUBLIC USES.
FURTHER TO THE WEST IS INTERSTATE 275.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE,
WHICH IS OUTLINED HERE IN PURPLE.
IT DOES HAVE A SPLIT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE SITE
BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL 20, WHICH IS ALSO TO THE NORTH,
EAST, AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION, WHICH IS TO THE
NORTH, WEST, AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THE SITE IS WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE WHERE THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES ENHANCED DESIGN THAT PROMOTES
A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY PATTERN AND THE SITE IS ALONG NORTH
NEBRASKA AVENUE.
A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR RECOGNIZED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AS SUITABLE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND INTENSIFICATION.
GIVEN THE SITE IS WITHIN TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
AND WITHIN AN URBAN VILLAGE, THE SITE IS ELIGIBLE TO UTILIZE

LAND USE POLICY 5.1.6 TO PROPORTIONATELY WEIGH THE INTENSITY
AND DENSITY ACROSS THE ENTIRE SITE AND THE APPLICANT IS
CHOOSING TO USE THIS POLICY.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST ALIGNS WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED
UNDER THE R-20 AND CMU 35 DESIGNATIONS AND SUPPORTS POLICY
DIRECTION THAT ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AT SLIGHTLY HIGHER
DENSITY OVERALL COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN.
AS DESCRIBED IN LAND USE POLICY 6.1.13, THE PORTION OF THE
PARCEL DESIGNATED CMU 35 IS CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN A MIXED
USE CORRIDOR WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IDENTIFIES AS
APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND INCREASED
DENSITY AND INTENSITY TO SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE MODES OF
TRANSPORTATION.
THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUPPORTS MANY OF THESE
PRINCIPLES BY PLACING PARKING BEHIND THE BUILDING, ORIENTING
PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES TOWARDS THE
STREET, PROVIDING BICYCLE STORAGE, AND SIX-FOOT SIDEWALK
AROUND THE PARCEL.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES RELATED TO HOUSING THE
CITY'S POPULATION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ENSURES
AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST
SHARE OF GROWTH TOWARDS URBAN VILLAGES.

OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH
THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
7:29:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YAY.
GOOD JOB.
7:29:24PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
FOR THE RECORD AGAIN, CHRISTOPHER
DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTLINED IN RED.
IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EAST 23rd AVENUE AND
EAST OF NORTH NEBRASKA.
IT IS ACTUALLY LOCATED ON THAT NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT
INTERSECTION BETWEEN THOSE TWO STREETS.
SURROUNDING USES, WE DO HAVE CG ZONING AND RS 50 ZONING TO
THE NORTH.
SO WE HAVE A CONVENIENCE STORE, A GAS STATION ON THE CG
ZONED PROPERTY AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS ON THE
RS 50 PORTIONS TO THE NORTH.
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
DWELLINGS, SO RS 50.
AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS WITH RS 50 ZONING AS WELL AS CG ZONING,
AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE DO HAVE COMMERCIAL USES AS
WELL AS VACANT PARCEL ZONED CG.

NOW, I DO WANT TO, BEFORE I JUMP INTO THIS SITE PLAN, I WANT
TO PREFACE WHAT I'M GOING TO SAY BY NOTING THAT THIS
APPLICATION WAS CONTINUED AT THE APRIL 9 HEARING.
DURING THAT CONTINUANCE PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MET WITH THE
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, TALKED ABOUT THE SITE, HEARD THEIR
CONCERNS, AND MADE SOME ADJUSTMENTS.
TONIGHT, I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
OF RECORD.
THE APPLICANT WILL SHOW YOU THE CHANGES AND, OF COURSE, IF
YOU APPROVE THOSE ITEMS TONIGHT, THEY WOULD BE MADE BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND READING.
THE REVISION SHEET YOU HAVE REFLECTS THE CHANGES THAT WE'VE
REVIEWED FROM THE APPLICANT.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THEM SO THEY ARE REFLECTED IN
THE REVISION SHEET AND STAFF REPORT PACKET THAT YOU DO HAVE.
WITH THAT SAID, HAVING A LOOK HERE AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
THE BUILDING IS OUTLINED IN THE DOTTED LINE.
THE SITE IS BROKEN UP BETWEEN R-20 FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND CMU 35 ON
THE WEST.
ON THE GROUND FLOOR, WE HAVE 1850 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL
SPACE.
THERE ARE ENTRANCES TO THE RETAIL SPACE OFF NORTH NEBRASKA
AS WELL AS EAST 23rd AVENUE.
THERE'S ALSO 41 PARKING SPACES.

GROUND LEVEL PARKING SPACES TO SERVICE THIS DEVELOPMENT AS
WELL AS A TWO-WAY INGRESS, EGRESS LOCATED ON THAT NORTH SIDE
OF EAST 23rd AVENUE.
ACCESS TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WOULD BE WAY OF THE INTERIOR
PARKING AREA AS WELL AS THE DOOR LOCATED ON NORTH NEBRASKA
AVENUE.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT AND
YOU'LL SEE, AS THE APPLICANT WILL SHOW YOU, THERE'S BEEN A
MINOR CHANGE HERE TO THE ELEVATION, PARTICULARLY ON THE
SOUTH ELEVATION.
YOU'RE ONLY GOING TO SEE ONE LEVEL ABOVE THE COVERED PARKING
AREA INSTEAD OF TWO LEVELS ABOVE THE PARKING AREA.
IT WILL ALSO BE REFLECTED HERE ON THE NORTH ELEVATION WHERE
YOU WILL ONLY SEE ONE LEVEL ABOVE THE PARKING.
THAT'S THE MAJOR CHANGE THAT THEY MADE AND WE'VE REVIEWED.
ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE THE WEST ELEVATION, WHICH THIS IS THE
VIEW FROM NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND THE EAST ELEVATION FROM
THOSE RS 50 ZONED PROPERTIES.
OF COURSE, THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE ONE WAIVER.
IT IS TO SECTION 27-284.
THIS IS A REQUEST TO AMEND THE REQUIRED 15-FOOT USE
LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SIX FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL TO PROVIDE
FOR A 15-FOOT USE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SIX FOOT TALL PVC
FENCE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE RS 50
ZONING AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING USE.

WE DO HAVE PHOTOS.
THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS OF TODAY.
THAT'S NOT THE ONE I WANT TO SHOW YOU.
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
WE DO HAVE AN ALLEYWAY THAT BISECTS THE TWO PROPERTIES
THERE.
WE HAVE THE GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE.
ADDITIONALLY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS.
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ACROSS EAST 23rd.
IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
LOOKING ACROSS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE, ONE ADDITIONAL LOOK
THAT WOULD BE THE VACANT PARCEL.
AND THEN WE HAVE LOOKING DOWN EAST 23rd AND LOOKING WEST
DOWN EAST 23rd.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION FROM PLANNING STAFF HAS REVIEWED
THE APPLICATION.
WE DO FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE
OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION, MODIFICATIONS
TO THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET
MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
7:34:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

HEARING NONE, APPLICANT.
I SUSPECT THIS WILL BE EASIER THAN THE LAST ONE.
7:34:43PM >> SHOULD I BE SPEEDY?
7:34:44PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YES, PLEASE.
WE'VE BEEN HERE ALL DAY.
7:34:49PM >> WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE CONTINUANCE THAT WAS GRANTED IN
APRIL.
YOU MIGHT HAVE SEEN A FEW COMMENTS THAT WERE IN YOUR PACKET.
THEY ALL WERE BEFORE WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION.
WE SPENT A VERY LIVELY TIME SPEAKING WITH THEM AND
DISCUSSING ISSUES THAT THEY WANTED TO HAVE RESOLVED.
I BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE RESOLVED THEM.
WE NOTCHED THE BUILDING OUT TO SAVE THESE TREES ON THE NORTH
SIDE.
WE LIMITED THIS SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO ONE STORY OVER
THE PARKING, SO WE ELIMINATED ONE ENTIRE FLOOR, AND WE LOST
-- REDUCED THE NUMBER OF UNITS.
WE ADDRESSED THE ISSUE REGARDING DENSITY THAT THEY WANTED
ADDRESSED.
THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE.
WE PUT IN THE COVERED PARKING -- I MEAN THE COVERED BICYCLE.
WE MEET THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
WE INCREASED THE BUFFERS ON THIS SIDE, AND WE THOUGHT IN OUR
DISCUSSIONS THAT THE PVC FENCE ON THIS SIDE WAS MORE

APPROPRIATE THAN A MASONRY WALL.
WE ALSO DISCUSSED THE ISSUES WITH TPD.
APPARENTLY THIS IS NOT PART OF THIS PETITION, BUT I JUST
WANT TO BRING IT TO YOUR ATTENTION.
THERE ARE SERIOUS CRIME-RELATED ISSUES REGARDING THIS ALLEY
AND THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER, THE CONVENIENCE STORE.
SO TPD IS DOING THEIR THING AND I DON'T WANT TO GO INTO WHAT
THEY ARE DOING.
WE ALSO AGREED THAT AT OUR EXPENSE WE WOULD PETITION TO
VACATE THE ALLEY.
AND THAT WILL BE COMING TO YOU LATER ON.
WE ARE WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION.
THIS, ALTHOUGH IS RELATED TO THE ONE THAT YOU'LL HEAR RIGHT
AFTER THIS, ZONING PETITION, BUT I BELIEVE WE HAVE ADDRESSED
THE ISSUES THAT WE WERE ASKED TO ADDRESS.
THEY ASKED FOR SOME DESIGN AMENITIES WHICH WE WILL GO OVER
WHEN IT COMES THROUGH THE DESIGN REVIEW, INCLUDING ADDING
BALCONIES AND SOME FENESTRATION THAT THEY WANTED.
SO THIS SIDE NEXT TO NEBRASKA AVENUE IS THREE STORIES.
THIS SIDE OVER HERE IS ONE STORY OVER THE GARAGE.
IT IS ON A TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
WE VALUE THE INPUT THAT WE RECEIVED AND WE'VE HAD A COUPLE
OF MEETINGS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP.
AND I BELIEVE A REPRESENTATIVE IS HERE TO TALK ABOUT THAT.

THE CONSISTENCY ISSUE WAS RESOLVED WITH BOTH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
WE DO HAVE A SPLIT LAND USE DESIGNATION.
SO WE HAD TO BLEND AND REDUCE THE DENSITY ON THE EAST SIDE.
7:37:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.
7:37:54PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
WELL, ONE, I'M GLAD, YOU KNOW, THAT YOU ALL
GOT TO MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND MAKING
THOSE CHANGES.
JUST ME, YOU KNOW, I'M GLAD TO HEAR YOU MAY BE ADDING SOME
ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS TO IT BECAUSE JUST LOOKING AT THE
PICTURES OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IN YBOR AND ALSO KIND
OF SIMILAR IN TAMPA HEIGHTS, YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, THE PITCHED
ROOFS AND THE COLUMNS AND THE PORCHES AND SO I'M HAPPY TO
SEE SOME DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING ON NEBRASKA BECAUSE I KNOW
WE'RE WANTING TO REVITALIZE THAT AREA AND BRING SOME
HOUSING.
BUT I WOULD LOVE TO JUST SEE MAYBE BE A LITTLE MORE
PRETTIER.
I KNOW THE WEST SIDE IS KIND OF BLANK.
SO WE'LL BE SEEING A LOT OF JUST KIND OF SPACE.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S ADDING MORE WINDOWS OR SOMETHING BUT,
YOU KNOW, SOMETHING JUST TO MAKE IT A LITTLE I DON'T KNOW IF
THE ONLY WORD I CAN THINK OF IS PRETTIER.
BUT I THINK HAVING SOMETHING ON NEBRASKA I THINK IS GOOD AND

IT'S ADDING MORE HOUSING AND ALSO HAVING THE RETAIL SPACE.
7:39:05PM >> WE'RE REMOVING AN OLDER APARTMENT BUILDING THAT'S THERE.
BUT ONE OF THE THINGS PROBABLY IN THE PROCESS, WE'RE
REQUIRED TO PUT ELEVATIONS IN THAT SHOW SOMETHING, BUT IT'S
NOT NECESSARILY THE FINAL PRODUCT.
AS WE GO THROUGH THE PROCESS, IT DOES GET MORE ATTRACTIVE.
THERE'S ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AS WELL AS THE BALCONIES
AND THE WINDOWS.
AND THOSE THINGS WILL COME BACK, AND WE WILL STAY IN TOUCH
WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP TO ADDRESS THAT.
AND THEY HAVE BEEN -- WE'VE HAD SOME, AS I SAID, EXCITING
DISCUSSIONS, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, I THINK IT WAS ALL
USEFUL AND VERY PRODUCTIVE.
I BELIEVE THEY'LL SAY THE SAME THING.
SO WE APPRECIATE IT.
7:39:52PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ANYTHING ELSE?
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC HERE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
HEARING NONE, CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK?
7:40:01PM >> THAT IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP.
7:40:02PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COME ON UP.
START WITH YOUR NAME AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
HELLO.
GOOD EVENING.
7:40:09PM >> MICHAEL BAILEY.

7:40:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YOU HAVE TO GET UP HERE TO THE PODIUM
FIRST.
THE MICROPHONE IS EMBEDDED IN THE PODIUM.
START WITH YOUR NAME.
7:40:17PM >> MICHAEL BAILEY.
7:40:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
7:40:19PM >> I LIVE AT 910 EAST 23rd.
AND THE PROPERTY YOU'RE SPEAKING OF RIGHT NOW IS ABOUT 100
YARDS TO THE WEST OF ME.
ME AND MY WIFE PLAY A LITTLE GAME OF, WAS THAT A BACKFIRE OR
A GUNSHOT FROM THE GAS STATION NEXT DOOR?
IT'S BEEN ROPED OFF TWICE WITHIN THE PAST SIX WEEKS BECAUSE
OF DRUGS, TPD TRYING TO COLLECT EVERYBODY UP THAT SELLS
DRUGS THERE, AND, OH, EXCUSE THE ATTIRE.
I WASN'T EXPECTING THIS.
MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS BETWEEN THE PARCEL, I THINK IT'S
CALLED 19 WHERE THEY HAVE THE FIVE LOTS IS THE AMOUNT OF
HOUSING THEY ARE LOOKING TO PUT THERE.
AND THEN YOU DOUBLE THAT DOWN WITH THIS PROPERTY, YOU TRIPLE
THE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY OF PEOPLE EXITING TO GET ON TO
NEBRASKA AVENUE.
IT'S HARD ENOUGH AS IT IS RIGHT NOW.
THERE'S NO BIKE LANE.
SO WHEN I COME UP, I HAVE TO LOOK TO MY RIGHT TO MAKE SURE I
CAN PULL OUT, MAKE SURE I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THE HIT AND

HAVE TO LOOK TO THE LEFT TO MAKE SURE NO ONE IS COMING THIS
DIRECTION AND THEN HAVE TO LOOK AGAIN BECAUSE NO BIKE LANE,
LITTLE MOTOR SCOOTERS ARE USING THE SIDEWALK TO TRAVEL.
SO I'M LIKE THIS, THIS FOR SAFETY REASON, MAKING SURE I
DON'T HIT A PEDESTRIAN.
THAT MAKES IT TROUBLESOME FOR ME TO GET OUT ONTO NEBRASKA
AVENUE LIVING A HUNDRED YARDS AWAY FROM THIS POINT.
I'VE ACTUALLY HAD MAYBE TWO YEARS AGO A YOUNG HISPANIC KID
HIT THE SIDE OF MY VEHICLE, AND I GUESS MAYBE THERE WAS SOME
REASON, BUT HE JUST GOT ON HIS BIKE, GAVE ME A DIRTY LOOK
AND TOOK OFF.
WE CAN MAKE GUESSES AS TO WHAT THAT'S ABOUT.
I KNOW FROM WHAT I SEE, WHAT I SAW ON THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
UNITS ARE GOING TO BE BUILT NORTH-SOUTH.
NOW, IF EVERYTHING WAS BUILT EAST-WEST AND THE TREE THAT'S
GOING TO COME DOWN ANYWAY, IF THAT COULD BE ALLOWED TO COME
DOWN AND HAVE EVERYONE EXIT DIRECTLY ONTO NEBRASKA AVENUE
VERSUS A RESIDENTIAL STREET, THAT WOULD BE GRAND.
OTHERWISE, I SEE I HAVE 17 SECONDS LEFT.
THERE IS AN ALLEY THERE.
THAT ALLEY IS USED, I DON'T KNOW WHY, PEOPLE WHO WALK UP AND
DOWN 24th AND 23rd, BUT THEY USE THAT ALLEY.
I'VE HAD OBJECTS THROWN OVER THE FENCE INTO MY YARD.
7:43:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU.

NEXT SPEAKER.
START WITH YOUR NAME.
7:43:27PM >> GOOD EVENING.
KIM HEADLAND.
1023 EAST 17th AVENUE JUST A FEW BLOCKS FROM THIS
PROPERTY.
I DO WANT TO SAY AS A LONGTIME RESIDENT OF VM YBOR I
STRONGLY SUPPORT CONTINUED INVESTMENT ALONG THAT CORRIDOR
FOR A FEW REASONS.
WE NEED HOUSING.
THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE LONG-TERM
VITALITY, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THAT CORRIDOR AND, QUITE
HONESTLY, THE STABILITY.
WE NEED THE STABILITY.
I THINK YOU HEARD WHY WE NEED A LITTLE BIT OF STABILITY.
PROJECTS OF THIS SCALE SHOULD BE THOUGHTFULLY DESIGNED TO
RESPECT ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS PARTICULARLY AT TRANSITIONS
TO LOWER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
NAYA, I THINK YOU TOUCHED ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THAT,
NEBRASKA AVENUE ELEVATION, BUT ALSO THE 23rd AVENUE
ELEVATION.
I DO REALLY WANT TO THANK THE APPLICANT.
THEY MET WITH US THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION LAST
MONTH JUST IN MAY.
THEY LISTENED AND THEY REVISED THE PLAN CONSIDERABLY IN

RESPONSE.
MOST SIGNIFICANTLY WAS THE REDUCTION OF UNITS ON THE R-20
PARCEL TO 5 AND THE REDUCTION OF HEIGHT.
THAT MAKES THAT TRANSITION TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY NATURE OF
THE WEST OF 23rd AVENUE MORE SUCCESSFUL.
I DO WANT TO SAY THAT THE DESIGN STILL PRESENTS A LARGE,
LONG PRIMARILY BLANK WALL WITH A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AT THE
PEDESTRIAN LEVEL ALONG 23rd AVENUE, ALONG WITH THE BLANK
FACADES ON NEBRASKA.
WE CONTINUE TO ASK THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER ADDING
ARTICULATION, FENESTRATION, LANDSCAPING ALONG THAT STRETCH,
ALONG BOTH STRETCHES, ACTUALLY, BUT ALSO WE UNDERSTAND THAT
THAT FACADE DESIGN WILL BE MORE FULLY REALIZED AS THE
APPLICANT MOVES FORWARD THROUGH PERMITTING AND THEY'LL HAVE
TO COMPLY WITH THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY.
SO WE'RE HOPEFUL THAT SOME OF THE ITEMS WILL BE ADDRESSED AS
THE DESIGN IS EVOLVING.
BUT ONE OTHER IMPORTANT THING TO NOTE IS THAT THE PARKING IS
BASICALLY ONE SPACE PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND EIGHT SPACES
FOR THE RETAIL, BUT IT HAS NO VISITOR PARKING.
I THINK YOU CAN SEE IN SOME OF THE PHOTOS THERE'S SOME
CONCERN ABOUT WHAT THAT MEANS FOR 23rd AVENUE GOING
FORWARD WHEN YOU HAVE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE
INGRESS/EGRESS ALL KIND OF COMING OFF THAT FIRST FEW HUNDRED
FEET OF 23rd AVENUE.

IT'S A LOT.
THEN ADD VISITOR PARKING TO THAT, WE JUST HOPE THAT MAYBE
THIS CAN BE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED WITH SOME STIPULATION
ABOUT VISITOR PARKING AND HOW MAYBE THOSE 8 RETAIL SPACES
WORK WITH VISITOR PARKING ON-SITE SO IT DOESN'T FURTHER
CHOKE 23rd AVENUE.
WITH THAT, THANK YOU FOR WORKING WITH US ON THIS AND
LISTENING TO THE COMMUNITY.
JUST REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
7:46:30PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM?
MR. MICHELINI.
7:46:38PM >> WE APPRECIATE ALL OF IT.
WE'VE GOTTEN TO A BETTER PRODUCT AND ONE THAT SATISFIES THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
AS KIM JUST SAID, WE TOOK AN ENTIRE FLOOR OFF OF THE EAST
SIDE TO PROVIDE THAT BETTER TRANSITION BETWEEN THIS PROJECT
AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY FURTHER TO THE EAST.
WE EXPLORED AN ACCESS ONTO NEBRASKA AT SEVERAL DIFFERENT
REITERATIONS.
AS JONATHAN CAN TELL YOU, THAT WAS NOT EVEN BEGINNING TO BE
SUCCESSFUL.
THE NEIGHBOR THAT SPOKE ABOUT TRYING TO GET THAT DONE, WE
DID.
IT WENT NOWHERE.

BUT ANYWAY, WE HAVE A BETTER PRODUCT.
WE'VE BEEN FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT.
WE HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE NEIGHBORS AND WOULD APPRECIATE
YOUR CONSIDERATION AND FAVORABLY PASS THIS.
7:47:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. MICHELINI, WOULD YOU BE WILLING
BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING TO HAVE MORE COMPLETE SORT
OF BINDING ELEVATIONS ON THE TWO FACES THAT THE PEOPLE ARE
CONCERNED ABOUT SO WE CAN HAVE A BETTER LOOK AT WHAT THE
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES WOULD LOOK LIKE?
7:47:45PM >> YES, SIR.
7:47:45PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
THANK YOU.
7:47:48PM >> AND WE ARE COMMITTING TO MAKING THE CHANGES THAT HAVE
BEEN REQUESTED BY STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING.
7:47:56PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CAN YOU MAYBE HELP ME WITH WHAT THAT WOULD
LOOK LIKE?
7:48:01PM >> THE REVISION SHEET.
7:48:03PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
I WOULD ASK COUNCIL MAYBE SPECIFY THE SPECIFIC FACADES, THE
DIRECTIONAL, WHETHER IT'S --
7:48:11PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IT'S DIFFICULT BECAUSE WE'RE NOT GOING TO
DESIGN IT FROM THE DAIS.
I THINK WE WOULD LIKE MORE DETAIL ON THE TWO ELEVATIONS, SO
ELEVATIONS WITH DETAIL TO SHOW THAT YOU'RE BREAKING UP THOSE
FACADES SO THEY AESTHETICALLY BLEND WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD

AND BUILDING A QUALITY PRODUCT.
TRYING TO BREAK THAT UP.
7:48:31PM >> WE WOULD SUGGEST MAYBE THE WEST AND SOUTH FACADES.
7:48:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
23rd STREET AND NEBRASKA.
7:48:37PM >> NEBRASKA AND EAST 23rd SIDE, WE CAN WORK WITH THE
APPLICANT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS AND GET IT
UPDATED.
7:48:44PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI, FOR CONSENTING
TO DO THAT.
ANYTHING ELSE?
HEARING NONE, CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE?
MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, COULD YOU PLEASE READ THIS WITH THE
REVISION SHEETS AND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND
READING?
7:49:03PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
REZ-25-86, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR
FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY
IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3101 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE IN THE
CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50,
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, AND CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD,

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND
ALL CG USES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, ALONG WITH THE
REVISION SHEET AND REQUESTED ELEVATION CHANGES AS STATED BY
THE CHAIRMAN AND NOTIFIED BY THE PETITIONER.
7:49:41PM >> WEST AND SOUTH SIDES.
7:49:42PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WEST AND SOUTH SIDES.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE I TAKE THIS VOTE?
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
7:49:54PM >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.
7:49:55PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 16, 2026 AT
10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY
BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602.
7:50:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE MISSED THAT DEADLINE.
LET'S SHOOT FOR ANOTHER ONE.
GO.
7:50:15PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
AGAIN, FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER
DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
AGENDA ITEM 8 IS REZ 25-119, REQUEST TO REZONE 915 EAST

23rd AVENUE FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
USES.
I'LL TURN IT OVER NOW TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
7:50:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DID YOU HAVE COFFEE?
7:50:41PM >>EMILY PHELAN:
NO.
EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF.
THE SITE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, EAST
TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD EVACUATION ZONE E.
THIS IS THE SURROUNDING AREA OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
IT'S OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
THE SITE WE JUST HEARD WAS HERE.
THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL WITH
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND SOME TWO FAMILY IN THAT
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IS ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE.
THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE
WHICH IS OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION TO THE
EAST OF THE SITE IS THE RESIDENTIAL 10 AND TO THE WEST ALONG
NORTH NEBRASKA IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PATTERN ALONG EAST 23rd AVENUE WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 20
DESIGNATION.
ALONG THIS SEGMENT BETWEEN NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND NORTH
10th STREET, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE AND VACANT

PARCELS, 11 SAMPLES HAD AN EXISTING DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY
9.75 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE PROPOSED PD WOULD ALLOW TEN DWELLING UNITS RESULTING IN
DENSITY OF APPROXIMATELY 15.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE,
CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION.
WHILE IT IS NEARLY DOUBLE THE EXISTING DENSITY ALONG THIS
PORTION OF EAST 23rd AVENUE, IT ALIGNS WITH THE DENSITY
ANTICIPATED UNDER THE R-20 AND SUPPORTS POLICY DIRECTION
THAT ALLOWS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOUSING AT SLIGHTLY
HIGHER DENSITIES IN SINGLE-FAMILY AREAS AND OVERALL, THE
REQUEST IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL
PROVIDE INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND BETTER UTILIZATION OF THE
LAND IN AN AREA PLANNED FOR 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE
WHERE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES ENHANCED DESIGN THAT
PROMOTES A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITH
DENSITIES THAT ENCOURAGE TRANSIT USE.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
DEVELOPMENT TO BE DESIGNED WITH FRONT DOOR ORIENTED TOWARDS
A NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK AND STREET.
THE PROPOSED DESIGN ORIENTS THE UNITS OF 6 THROUGH 10
TOWARDS EAST 23rd AVENUE WITH A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION.
AND UNITS 1 THROUGH 5 FACE AN INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE WITH A
SIDEWALK ALONG THE DRIVE AISLE AND CROSS WALK CONNECTING

THEM TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG EAST 23rd AVENUE.
WHILE THIS DOES PROVIDE A SAFE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AND THE
DESIGN MEETS THE INTENT OF LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 THERE IS
STILL POTENTIAL FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CONFLICTS WITH
CARS BACKING OUT OF GARAGES.
THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES RELATED TO HOUSING THE
CITY'S POPULATION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ENSURES
AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IS AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO DIRECTS THE GREATEST SHARE OF
GROWTH TOWARD THE URBAN VILLAGES.
OVERALL THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE AND
COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
7:53:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
BRAVO.
ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, NEXT.
7:53:45PM >> CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THIS PARTICULAR SITE IS LOCATED EAST OF ITEM NUMBER 7 WHICH
WAS JUST HEARD BY THIS COUNCIL.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF EAST 23rd AVENUE.
THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACE AND SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED BETWEEN
NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND NORTH 10th STREET.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED WITH A MULTIPLE FAMILY
BUILDING AS WELL AS SOME OPEN LAND AREA THAT IS IMMEDIATELY
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
LOOKING AT SURROUNDING USES, WE DO HAVE RS 50 ZONING TO THE
NORTH WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS.
THERE IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONED PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
THIS SITE WAS APPROVED IN JUNE OF 2025 FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS.
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, RS 50 ZONING WITH SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS, WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE RS 50
ZONING WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS AND SOUTH OF
THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE RS 50 ZONING WITH SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLINGS AS WELL AS RM 16 ZONING AND THERE IS ONE
SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED DWELLING UNIT LOCATED
IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
MUCH LIKE THE LAST CASE, THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED AT THE
APRIL 9 HEARING.
THE APPLICANT MET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CHANGES MADE.
I'LL MAKE REFERENCE TO THEM, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL SHOW YOU
THOSE CHANGES AS PART OF THEIR PRESENTATION.
WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN OF RECORD.
WE DO HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND WE DO SHOW ONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 23rd AVENUE.

SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPOSES TEN SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
DWELLING UNITS.
THERE ARE TWO ACCESS POINTS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER.
THERE IS A TWO WAY ACCESS POINT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER, TWO
WAY ACCESS POINT.
THERE IS A TWO WAY INTERNAL DRIVEWAY.
UNITS ONE THROUGH FIVE, THE FRONT DOORS OF THOSE UNITS FACE
THE INTERNAL DRIVEWAY WHEREAS UNITS SIX THROUGH TEN FACE
EAST 23rd AVENUE.
THE -- ALL TEN UNITS PROPOSE TWO-CAR GARAGES.
THESE ARE THREE-STORY STRUCTURES.
AND THEN I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED
A TOTAL OF THREE WAIVERS.
FIRST IS TO SECTION 27-284.
THIS IS A REQUEST TO REMOVE A NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND LIVE OAK.
NUMBER TWO, WAIVER NUMBER TWO IS SECTION 27-240.
THIS REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM
15 FEET TO PROPOSED 10-FOOT SETBACK.
THE THIRD WAIVER IS TO SECTION 27-240.
THIS IS A REQUEST TO HAVE THE FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION OF
UNITS ONE THROUGH FIVE FACE INTERNAL DRIVE RATHER THAN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
NOW, WHAT THE APPLICANT CHANGED WITH COORDINATION FROM THE
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS THE ADDITION OF FRONT PORCHES
ALONG UNITS 6 THROUGH TEN FACING EAST 23rd AVENUE AS WELL

AS SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WHICH IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS
SITE PLAN BUT THERE IS ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED THAT
WOULD BE PART OF THEIR PRESENTATION.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED BOTH OF THESE ADDITIONS.
WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THEM.
AND THEY HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE REVISION SHEET THAT
IS PART OF YOUR STAFF REPORT PACKET.
LASTLY, WE WANT TO SHOW YOU THOSE ELEVATIONS.
WE HAVE THE NORTH ELEVATION, SOUTH ELEVATION.
EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS.
THOSE WOULD BE FOR UNITS 6 THROUGH 10.
THESE ARE FOR UNITS 1 THROUGH 5.
SIMILAR DESIGN, BUT ON 6 THROUGH 10, YOU'LL SEE WITH THE
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION THE ADDITION OF THOSE PORCHES.
PHOTOS NEXT.
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
ADDITIONAL TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, EAST OF THE BUILDING YOU
JUST SAW.
NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE.
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS
APPLICATION AND WE DO FIND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF
TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

AND SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE
THIS APPLICATION, MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN ON
THE SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET WOULD BE COMPLETED BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND READING.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
7:58:53PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
HEARING NONE, APPLICANT.
7:59:01PM >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.
STEVE MICHELINI.
I HAVE BEEN SWORN.
AGAIN, THIS WAS ONE OF THOSE PROJECTS THAT BENEFITED GREATLY
FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.
WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW TO INCORPORATE SOME OF
THE CHANGES THAT THEY WERE ASKING FOR.
AND WE INCLUDED MORE GREENSPACE.
IT'S ACTUALLY KIND OF A RECREATION AREA ON ONE SIDE OF THE
PROPERTY.
IT TAKES THE PARKING ISSUE OFF OF 23rd AVENUE AND MAKES IT
-- TAKES IT INTERNAL TO THE SITE.
AND EACH OF THOSE UNITS HAS TWO COVERED ENCLOSED PARKING
SPACES.
IT IS CLOSE TO A TRANSIT CORRIDOR.
WE'VE ADDED THE GREENSPACE.
IT TAKES THE PARKING OFF OF THE MAIN STREET.
THE PORCHES AND THE BALCONIES WERE ADDED.

IF YOU LOOKED AT IT AT THE ELEVATIONS THAT CHRISTOPHER
SHOWED YOU, IT EMULATES THE BUNGALOW STYLE OF HOUSES THAT
ARE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
WE'LL BE USING THAT ON THE NEW ELEVATIONS YOU ASKED FOR FOR
THE PREVIOUS CASE.
IT IS CONSISTENT BY BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY STAFF.
IT IS R-20 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION, WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE
DENSITY THAT WE'RE REQUESTING.
BASICALLY THE OAK, WE TRIED TO AVOID HAVING TO TAKE THAT ONE
OAK OUT, BUT UNFORTUNATELY IT'S IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVE
AISLE.
THE FRONT SETBACK FROM 15 TO 10 FEET IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
SETBACKS THAT OCCUR ALONG THE STREET.
SO IT'S NOT PUSHING IT OUT ANY FURTHER THAN ANY OF THE OTHER
PROPERTIES.
THE FRONT DOOR ACCESS HAS TO DO WITH THE REAR UNITS, WHEN WE
SHIFTED THEM AROUND TO KEEP THE PARKING IN THE BACK AND
ACCESS THAT, REQUIRES THAT WAIVER.
I'LL BE HAPPY TO GO THROUGH ALL THE REST OF THE REPORT FOR
THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND POLICIES AND CONDITIONS
THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH.
IF YOU'D LIKE, OR JUST ASK THAT THEY BE RECEIVED AND FILED
AND MADE PART OF THE RECORD.
8:01:12PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
RECEIVE AND FILE THEM.

NO MORE KIDDING TONIGHT.
IT'S 8:02.
8:01:20PM >> ANYWAY.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
AGAIN, KIM AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, WE HAD
EXTENSIVE DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THIS AND HOW TO ADDRESS
THEIR ISSUES.
I THINK WE'VE DONE THAT.
I TURN IT OVER.
8:01:33PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
OKAY.
COME ON UP.
ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM?
8:01:39PM >> I LIVE ADJACENT FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL --
8:01:44PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
START WITH YOUR NAME.
NAME.
STATE YOUR NAME.
8:01:48PM >> MICHAEL BAILEY.
SORRY.
I APOLOGIZE.
WHAT I JUST HEARD IS THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE HOMES IN THE AREA AND IT'S NOT.
THERE'S NOTHING LIKE THAT IN THE AREA.
STREETS BEHIND US, IN FRONT OF US.
SO IT WOULDN'T BE CONSISTENT AT ALL.
THE TREES, THE BUILDING ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME THAT

CAUGHT ON FIRE A YEAR AGO, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT BUILDING
GO.
I'M FINE WITH THAT.
BUT THAT WOULD BRING ONCE AGAIN MORE TRAFFIC ONTO 23rd I
THINK TOWARDS NEBRASKA.
SO YOU'RE DOUBLING THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT'S LOOKING TO
EXIT ONTO NEBRASKA AVENUE.
WE ALREADY HAVE A SEWAGE PROBLEM ON OUR SIDE OF 23rd.
AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE CITY IS GOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT
THAT, OR IF THAT'S ALREADY BEEN REFLECTED IN HOW THIS COMES
ABOUT, HOW THIS IS BUILT.
I'M NOT GOOD AT THIS.
THERE IS AN ELDERLY MAN THAT LIVES AT THE BOTTOM AT 10th
AND 23rd.
I DON'T KNOW HOW HE'S GOING TO DO WITH HIS ELECTRIC
WHEELCHAIR IN GETTING UP.
I KNOW LAST YEAR, ONE OF THE CITY CREW WORKERS CAME WITH THE
GRINDERS THAT EAT UP THE HIGH SPOTS.
I DON'T KNOW HOW HE'S GOING TO FARE WITH THIS.
MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS THE TRAFFIC.
AND I DON'T KNOW WHO MY NEW NEIGHBORS ARE GOING TO BE THAT
ARE BASICALLY AS FAR AS YOU ARE TO ME RIGHT NOW.
I'VE BEEN SIDESWIPED.
MY WIFE'S VEHICLE HAS BEEN SIDESWIPED.
THE OFFICER COMING TO SEE ME SAID WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN

YOU MOVED HERE?
MY JAW DROPPED ON THE GROUND.
THIS ISN'T GOING TO GET ANY BETTER FOR ME.
MY PROPERTY VALUE IS PROBABLY GOING TO FALL.
AND THIS ALSO SETS A PRECEDENT, IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WORD,
FOR THIS TO BE BUILT IN OTHER AREAS OF OUR HISTORIC
NEIGHBORHOOD.
NOW, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF I-4 IS HISTORICAL, BUT ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 22nd, IT'S CONSIDERED VM YBOR, VICTOR
MARTINEZ YBOR.
8:04:45PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
8:04:47PM >> AND THERE'S REALLY NO --
8:04:49PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU, SIR.
YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.
THANK YOU.
NEXT SPEAKER, START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE.
YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
8:04:56PM >> GOOD EVENING.
KIM HEADLAND.
1023 EAST 17th AVENUE.
I DO WANT TO START OFF AGAIN BY THANKING THE APPLICANT AND
ACKNOWLEDGING THAT BOTH THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND MR. MICHELINI
MET WITH OUR GROUP TWO TIMES IN PERSON OVER THE LAST EIGHT
MONTHS AND HOSTED TWO VERY LIVELY COMMUNITY MEETINGS WHERE

WE DISCUSSED A LOT OF THIS.
I DO WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SEVERAL OF THE COMMUNITY
CONCERNS WERE ADDRESSED, SPECIFICALLY THE ADDED FRONT
PORCHES, THE EVERGREEN LANDSCAPING TO FURTHER BUFFER THE
DUMPSTER.
THE REPLACED SURFACE RETENTION POND.
THEY REPLACED THAT WITH THE DESIGN FOR AN UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER SYSTEM.
AND ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED THE NUMBER OF TREES SLATED
FOR REMOVAL FROM THE ORIGINAL APP.
THE ONE CONTINUED CONCERN IS MASSING.
AND I THINK MICHAEL TOUCHED ON THIS.
IT IS A SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURE TO HAVE TWO EAST -- LET'S SEE,
EAST-WEST MASSES ON THOSE CONTIGUOUS LOTS.
THE ULTIMATE GOAL, OBVIOUSLY, IS COMPATIBILITY AND TO
PROVIDE HOUSING AND TO INFILL SOME OF THESE IMPORTANT VACANT
PARCELS SO WE CAN HAVE A MORE VIBRANT COMMUNITY.
BUT A BUILDING THAT READS LIKE A KIND OF LARGE GENERIC
SUBURBAN TOWNHOME ISN'T NECESSARILY COMPATIBLE WITH THE
HISTORIC NATURE OF THE COMMUNITY, EVEN IF IT'S NOT A
DESIGNATED HISTORIC DISTRICT.
HOWEVER, THAT BEING SAID, I THINK IN GENERAL WE ARE HOPEFUL
THAT ULTIMATELY WHEN AN ARCHITECT AND A DESIGN TEAM COMES
TOGETHER AND TAKES WHAT IS AN IMPROVED PD AND DEVELOPS THOSE
BUILDINGS THAT THERE WILL BE SOME SENSITIVITY TO BOTH THE

NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND THAT WE'VE BEEN
PLEASANTLY SURPRISE TO HAVE THE FEEDBACK AND COMMUNICATION
READILY AVAILABLE FROM THE APPLICANT AND HIS TEAM.
THANK YOU.
8:07:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MR. MICHELINI, BEFORE YOU START REBUTTAL,
MY CONCERN, BECAUSE MINE IS AGAIN THE MASSING OF HAVING THE
TWO BUILDINGS ON THE STREET.
STARTING A DIFFERENT FORM.
MAYBE YOU COULD ADDRESS THAT AND CONVINCE ME IT IS THE RIGHT
WAY TO GO BECAUSE RIGHT NOW I'M A LITTLE APPREHENSIVE.
IN OTHER WORDS, WHEN I LOOK AT THAT PARCEL, I WOULD SEE IF
YOU'RE GOING TO DEVELOP TOWNHOMES THAT YOU WOULD HAVE
TOWNHOMES THAT GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH AND HAVE A BACKYARD,
REAL FRONT YARD.
8:07:58PM >> I THINK THAT'S WHY -- WHERE ARE THOSE PICTURES, CHRIS?
WHAT WE TRIED TO DO WAS PICK UP THAT KIND OF DESIGN ELEMENT
WITH THE BUNGALOW STYLE ROOF.
IF YOU LOOK -- THERE WE IF.
IT'S NOT AN EXACT REPLICATION.
AGAIN, WE'LL HAVE TO MEET THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DESIGN
GUIDELINES.
AND THESE ARE GENERICALLY REPRESENTATIVE OF WHAT WE'RE
TRYING TO DO.
BUT YOU SEE THE PEEKS HERE AND THE PEEKS HERE AND HOW YOU
BREAK, THIS IS ACTUALLY THE REST OF THE WALL IS RECESSED.

THIS COMES OUT.
IT'S NOT REAL CLEAR BECAUSE THESE ARE NOT DESIGN DOCUMENTS,
BUT THE ELEMENTS ARE THERE AND WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE
THAT SO THAT IT BREAKS UP THAT FACADE.
AND THE STREET SIDE IS GOING TO BE FAR MORE ATTRACTIVE.
THAT IS THE SIDE THAT WE ADDED THE BALCONIES AND THE PORCHES
TO.
YOU'RE SEEING THE BACK SIDE ON THIS ONE.
WHAT'S THAT?
8:09:42PM >> THOSE ARE FOR ONE THROUGH FIVE.
AND THAT'S SIX THROUGH TEN.
8:09:49PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
YOU SEE WHERE THE ENTRANCE IS, WHERE WE
PUT THE PARAPETS OVER HERE, LITTLE CUPOLAS, THE ENTRYWAY,
THIS IS THE SIDE FACING THE STREET.
THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS BROUGHT FORWARD AND THESE
WINDOWS AND THIS IS THE WALL SECTION HERE, THAT'S RECESSED.
YOU DO HAVE A LOT MORE OF DESIGN ELEMENTS HERE THAN YOU
NORMALLY WOULD SEE.
AGAIN, IF YOU LOOK BACK TO SEE, THIS PICKS UP THOSE DESIGN
ELEMENTS FROM THINGS LIKE THAT.
8:10:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
IF YOU COULD ADDRESS THIS CONCERN, MY CONCERN IS NOT THIS
DESIGN ELEMENT BECAUSE I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
PICKING UP YOUR FRONT PORCH.
BUT YOU'RE BRINGING THIS FRONT BUILDING REALLY CLOSE TO THE

STREET, REALLY CLOSE -- CLOSER TO THE STREET THAN WHAT I SAW
IN SOME OTHER PICTURES FOR THE HOMES.
CORRECT?
OR DO YOU HAVE A BLOCK FRONTAGE --
8:10:49PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT AVERAGE.
WE CAN BRING IT BACK TO YOU.
BUT THESE ARE NOT 20 FEET BACK.
THIS ONE IS FURTHER BACK.
8:10:58PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT ONE IS.
AND THAT ONE IS.
SO MY QUESTION, AGAIN, WHEN I LOOK AT THIS BLOCK, YOU HEARD
US SAY THIS BEFORE, TOO MUCH ON TOO LITTLE, THAT IF THIS WAS
ONE BUILDING OF TOWN HOUSES, WITH THE APPROPRIATE SETBACK
WITH THE DESIGN ELEMENTS YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH THE FRONT
PORCHES BUT ADDING THAT DRIVE AISLE IN THE BACK WITH THE
FIVE OR SIX UNITS YOU HAVE IN THE BACK REALLY KIND OF -- THE
MASSING AND SCALE BECAUSE YOU'RE INTRODUCING A COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT ELEMENT INTO A SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD.
TOWN HOUSE ITSELF APPEAR TO BE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
ELEMENT, BUT BY ADDING THAT SECOND BUILDING YOU'RE PUTTING A
TOTALLY DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA.
8:11:40PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, THERE ARE OTHERS THAT HAVE
SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT.
YOU SEE THIS IS PRETTY CLOSE TO THE STREET.
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE IS RIGHT HERE WHERE THE BACK OF THE

SIDEWALK IS.
AND SO IS THIS ONE.
YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY ARE PRETTY CLOSE TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
BUT YOU ALSO HAVE ABOUT ANOTHER TEN FEET OR SO BETWEEN THE
SIDEWALK AND THE EDGE OF THE CURB.
8:12:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER EXAMPLES IN THIS
NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THERE'S TWO BUILDINGS RUNNING PARALLEL TO
THE STREET, THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, LIKE ALLEY-TYPE OF
CONSTRUCTION?
8:12:14PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
I DIDN'T COME WITH ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
BUT I CAN BRING IT BACK TO YOU.
I THINK THERE ARE SOME, BUT I JUST DON'T -- IT'S FURTHER
DOWN.
IT'S NOT COMPLETELY BRAND-NEW TO THIS AREA.
YOU SEE THE DRIVEWAY HERE, THIS GOES BEHIND.
8:12:48PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IS THERE OTHER SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES, OTHER
HOUSES BEHIND THAT?
8:12:55PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
I DIDN'T TAKE THAT PICTURE.
I BELIEVE SO.
CHRISTOPHER CAN TALK ABOUT IT.
8:13:01PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
THESE PHOTOS HERE, THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET FROM ITEM
NUMBER 7.
SO THESE ARE CLOSEST TO NEBRASKA, BUT THEY ARE EXAMPLES OF
THE HOMES BEING --

8:13:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THIS IS ON NEBRASKA.
8:13:17PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
THIS IS ON THE SAME STREET, EAST
23rd.
THEY ARE JUST CLOSER TO NEBRASKA.
8:13:22PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT'S BEHIND THESE HOUSES?
8:13:26PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
HAVE TO BRING THE AERIAL UP.
THAT'S ACROSS THE STREET.
8:13:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
DO WE SEE ANYTHING LIKE THAT IN THIS AREA?
8:14:00PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
THESE ARE THE TWO HOMES IN QUESTION
ON THE PHOTO WE JUST SHOWED YOU.
CAN'T TELL EXACTLY --
8:14:06PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT'S KIND OF BORDERING NEBRASKA.
I KNOW IT IS A SIDE YARD.
THAT'S DIFFERENT.
8:14:10PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS RIGHT HERE.
AND THESE ARE EXAMPLES THAT WE JUST PROVIDED HERE, AS WELL
AS HERE.
8:14:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT'S IN A CG -- THAT'S CG OVER THERE,
TOO.
KIND OF APPLES AND ORANGES HERE.
8:14:22PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THIS IS RESIDENTIAL DOWN IN HERE.
8:14:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I'M SAYING THE PARCELS THAT HE WAS SHOWING
TO ME BEFORE.
BUT I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER ALLEY-STYLE DEVELOPMENT ANYWHERE
IN THIS.

8:14:33PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, IT'S NOT ALLEY.
WE'RE CREATING A DRIVE AISLE BEHIND --
8:14:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I MEAN, STILL, BUILDING ON TOP OF
BUILDING.
AGAIN, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE YOU'VE GOT A SINGLE-FAMILY DEPTH
LOT AND WE'RE SQUEEZING TWO DEEP ON THERE.
8:14:53PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, IT'S VERY DEEP.
THIS LOT IS -- WHAT ARE THE DIMENSIONS ON THAT?
IT'S 139.
THAT'S ALMOST 40 FEET DEEPER THAN A REGULAR LOT.
8:15:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
BUT YOU'RE PUTTING A DRIVEWAY AND A
BUILDING.
8:15:11PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, WE CAN MODIFY IT SOME IF STAFF
ALLOWS IT SO IT'S NARROWER.
WE WANTED THE WIDER DRIVEWAY ON FURTHER EAST SIDE FOR THE
DUMPSTER AND THE DUMPSTER ACCESS WHICH IS WHAT THEY ASKED
FOR WITH ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING ON THAT END.
8:15:32PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WOULDN'T THIS MAKE MORE SENSE TO AGAIN
HAVE TOWN HOUSES JUST THREE TOWN HOUSES WITH ONE BUILDING,
LEGITIMATE SETBACK ON THE FRONT YARD, LEGITIMATE SETBACK ON
THE BACKYARD?
YOU'RE STILL INTRODUCING SOMETHING NEW, TOWN HOUSES IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD BUT YOU WOULD HAVE LESS MASS.
8:15:54PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, THE MASS IS REALLY VIEWED FROM THE
STREET SIDE, NOT FROM THE BACK.

YOU'RE NOT GOING TO -- THE MASSING IS NOT GOING TO OCCUR IN
--
8:16:02PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MASS AND DENSITY.
8:16:04PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, THE DENSITY COMPLIES WITH R-20.
THIS WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD IS ALREADY HAVING AN R-20
DESIGNATION.
8:16:12PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I DON'T CARE FOR IT.
I'LL LET OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS CHIME IN ON THIS.
COUNCIL MEMBER YOUNG.
8:16:17PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
I HAVE SOME OF THE SAME CONCERNS.
I DO LIKE THAT YOU INTRODUCED HAVING KIND OF LIKE A FRONT
PORCH STYLE TO FIT IN WITH THE SURROUNDING HOMES IN THE
AREA, BUT MY CONCERN ALSO IS GOING TO BE JUST THE MASSING.
I DO SEE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO AS FAR AS THE ELEMENTS ON
THE SURROUNDING HOMES.
BUT I WOULD HAVE TO KIND OF AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN.
8:16:51PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME REWORKING
OF THE SITE PLAN AND REWORKING OF SOME OF THE ELEMENTS, WE
WOULD -- WE'D HAVE TO GO BACK TO DRC, RIGHT?
8:17:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SEND IT BACK TO FIRST READING.
8:17:05PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WE WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK TO DRC.
I DON'T THINK YOU COULD HAVE A FIRST READING, BUT THAT'S
REALLY UP TO LaCHONE AND SUSAN.
THOSE KIND OF CHANGES ARE DRAMATIC.
SO REVIEWING THOSE BACK AGAIN WITH STAFF, IF THE COUNCIL

WISHES FOR US TO DO THAT, YOU'D PROBABLY HAVE TO SEND THIS
BACK TO STAFF TO WORK SITE PLAN CONDITIONS.
8:17:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
STAFF, GIVE US SOME GUIDANCE.
8:17:34PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
IF THEY WERE TO DO SOME REDESIGN OF THE SITE, THIS WOULD
NEED TO GO BACK TO DRC.
THIS AT A MINIMUM THREE DEPARTMENTS, TRANSPORTATION, ZONING
--
8:17:48PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT WOULD YOU NEED FROM US TO MAKE THIS
HAPPEN?
8:17:53PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
THE APPLICANT --
8:17:55PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
GIVE ME A DATE.
THE ISSUE OF ELIMINATING THE SECOND BUILDING IS STRICTLY --
IT'S A FINANCIAL ISSUE.
I MEAN, YOUR LAND COSTS DICTATE WHAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE IN
ORDER TO GIVE BACK.
I'M GUESSING, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO?
REQUEST A CONTINUANCE HERE?
8:18:30PM >>LaCHONE DOCK:
LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
WE CAN REQUEST A CONTINUANCE BUT STAFF NEEDS CLEAR DIRECTION
AS TO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS TO WORK ON IN BETWEEN THAT TIME
OF CONTINUANCE.
8:18:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
LET'S SEE IF WE CAN REACH A CONSENSUS UP
HERE BEFORE WE DO THAT.
I THINK THE TWO OF US AGREE IT IS THE SECOND BUILDING IS A

PROBLEM.
IF YOU ARE SAYING IT'S NOT DEVELOPABLE WITHOUT THE SECOND
BUILDING.
8:18:52PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WELL, IT'S SUCH A DEEP LOT.
TWO THINGS HAVE TO HAPPEN, EITHER YOU INCREASE THE SIZE OF
THE FRONT UNITS OR YOU DECREASE THE SIZE OF BOTH UNITS SO
THAT YOU MAKE THEM FIT AND COME INTO YOUR VIEW OF WHAT YOU'D
LIKE TO SEE.
8:19:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
TO ME IT SEEMS LIKE FORWARD-FACING, 23rd
STREET, FORWARD FACING TOWN HOUSES THAT RUN THROUGH, LARGER
UNITS, SO BE IT.
8:19:20PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
AGAIN, I CAN'T COMMIT FOR THE OWNERS ON
THIS.
I CAN COMMIT TO GO BACK AND SEE WHAT WE CAN DO.
8:19:28PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I'M EMPATHETIC WITH THE CAUSE.
AGAIN, THIS IS INTRODUCING A TOTALLY DIFFERENT ELEMENT IN
THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
HOW DOES EVERYBODY ELSE FEEL?
8:19:41PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
THE MASS OF IT IS NOT --
8:19:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE ASKING YOU, IF YOU ARE
ABLE TO GO BACK AND RE-ENVISION THIS WITH A SINGLE BUILDING,
RE-ENVISION IT WITH REAR-LOADING GARAGES, THAT WOULD BE EVEN
MORE PERFECT.
IF YOU CAN'T, YOU CAN'T.

8:20:00PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WHAT IS THE DATE, CHRIS?
8:20:07PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
ALSO IN BETWEEN, BETWEEN NOW AND THEN,
SPEAKING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AGAIN.
8:20:16PM >>BILL CARLSON:
STEVE, I AGREE WITH THE CHAIR'S COMMENTS.
IT'S DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:20:39PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
THE GENTLEMAN ON 21st, THE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
ABOUT TWO BLOCKS AWAY.
8:20:46PM >>BILL CARLSON:
BESIDES ME AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION,
MEET WITH MR. BAILEY ALSO AND SEE IF THERE'S SOME WAY TO --
8:20:54PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
WE'RE VERY FAMILIAR WORKING WITH KIM AND
HER ORGANIZING MEETINGS.
WE'D HAVE TO GO BACK TO THEM, TOO.
8:21:03PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE TRADE-OFF IS WE NEED DENSITY.
WE NEED MORE ACCESSIBLE PRICING ON HOUSING.
AT THE SAME TIME, WE CAN'T DISRUPT EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS
THAT DON'T HAVE ANY PATTERN TO IT.
I THINK THAT IS THE TRADE-OFF.
8:21:21PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT DATE DO WE HAVE?
8:21:23PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
SEPTEMBER 10.
8:21:26PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
EARLIEST DRC WE COULD GET THEM ON
WOULD BE JULY 21st OR 22nd.
IF THEY WERE TO WORK WITH GETTING A QUICK TURNAROUND AFTER
DRC IS HELD, WE COULD AIM TO GET THEM BACK BEFORE YOU ON
SEPTEMBER 10.

THE MORE PROTRACTED WAY AND I WOULD SAY IF YOU ARE APPLYING
FOR A NEW APPLICATION ALTOGETHER, IF YOU WENT INTO DRC IN
JULY, YOU WOULD BE ON OCTOBER 8.
WE COULD TRY FOR THAT SEPTEMBER.
8:21:55PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WITH SEPTEMBER 10?
8:21:58PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
LET'S TRY FOR THAT.
IF WE RUN INTO A TIME ISSUE, WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU AND ASK
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME.
8:22:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT'S GOOD.
I NEED A MOTION WITH THE DATE AND TIME.
8:22:11PM >>LUIS VIERA:
SEPTEMBER 10 AT 5 P.M., 5:01 P.M.
TAMPA, FLORIDA.
8:22:19PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE AS STATED BY
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
8:22:27PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
JUSTIFICATION IS THE REQUESTED CHANGES --
8:22:29PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
NOT INTRODUCING THE DOUBLE BUILDINGS INTO
THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
8:22:33PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
SITE PLAN, ET CETERA I THINK YOU HAVE TO
SAY THAT AS WELL.
8:22:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I THINK WE GAVE THE GUIDANCE.
GAVE THE GUIDANCE FOR YOU TO DISCUSS BEHIND THE SCENES.

8:22:44PM >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE:
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION.
YOUR GUIDANCE WOULD BE FOR THEM TO LOOK TO DESIGNING A
SINGLE BUILDING WITH REAR VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE OR
ACCESS TO GARAGES BEHIND THE UNITS.
8:22:57PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YEAH, WELL --
8:23:02PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
OR AN ALTERNATE THAT WOULD MEET YOUR
CONSIDERATION, CONCERNS.
8:23:07PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
TRYING TO BE MORE AESTHETIC INTO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
VERY GOOD.
8:23:13PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
DON'T YOU ALSO WANT BETTER ELEVATIONS?
8:23:17PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THAT WOULD NOT HURT.
YES.
SI SE OR.
8:23:26PM >> JUST READING YOUR MIND TONIGHT.
8:23:27PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
GRACIAS POR FAVOR.
8:23:31PM >>STEVE MICHELINI:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCIL.
8:23:39PM >>THE CLERK:
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH HURTAK BEING
ABSENT.
8:23:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGULAR SCHEDULED PROGRAM.
NEW BUSINESS?
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
8:23:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
I HAVE THREE HOPEFULLY QUICK ONES.
FIRST TWO WERE REQUESTED BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY.

FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR STAFF TO PROVIDE A
WRITTEN REPORT WITH AN INVENTORY OF EACH EXISTING CITY
MASTER PLAN AND ITS AGE FOR THE JULY 16 MEETING.
8:24:05PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
IS THERE A SECOND?
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
THAT OTHER IS CLOSED SO WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE.
THERE'S NO MORE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THAT.
YOU ARE WELCOME TO E-MAIL US OR SEND -- OR YOU CAN CALL
INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBERS, BUT YOU CAN E-MAIL US IF YOU'D
LIKE.
8:24:28PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
I'M SORRY, SIR.
8:24:31PM >> SHOULD THIS HAVE BEEN PUBLICLY NOTED SO THAT NOT JUST THE
PEOPLE IN THE ASSOCIATION BUT --
8:24:38PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
IT IS.
YOU MIGHT WANT TO ASK ONE OF THE STAFF PERSONS.
8:24:44PM >> ALL THE SIGNAGE HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED.
THAT WAS THERE FROM THREE WEEKS AGO.
THE STAKES IN THE GROUND SAYING THE MONEY IS --
8:24:53PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
BY THE WAY, SIR, IF I CAN, YOU CAN SPEAK TO
STAFF.
MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY.

JUST TO LET YOU KNOW TO MAKE A NOTE OF THE DATE AND TIME.
YOU WILL NOT GET ANY NOTICE IN THE MAIL AND THERE WILL NOT
BE POSTED SIGNS.
IT'S NOT REQUIRED BY THE CODE.
PLEASE DO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TALKING TO STAFF.
8:25:10PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THEY'LL LET YOU KNOW.
8:25:13PM >> STAFF IS WHO?
8:25:14PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:

8:25:15PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
THIS GENTLEMAN RIGHT HERE OR MS. DOCK.
8:25:18PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SIR, LOOK TO YOUR OTHER SIDE, THAT WAY.
THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
8:25:26PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SECOND ONE IS I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION
FOR STAFF TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN REPORT ON THE STUDY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS COMPLETED FOR THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FEES AND THEIR TIMELINES FOR JULY 16
MEETING.
8:25:41PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
8:25:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THE LAST ONE IS ONE I ADDED.
I'VE BEEN HEARING THAT -- I HAVEN'T LISTENED TO ALL THE
CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION MEETINGS BUT I'VE BEEN HEARING

THAT THEY DISMISSED MOST OR ALL OF OUR QUESTIONS THAT WE
ASKED.
AND NOW THE MAYOR'S POLITICAL ADVISOR IS SITTING THERE, SOME
MEMBERS FEEL INTIMIDATED BY THAT AND BULLIED TO FOLLOW
CERTAIN THINGS BY THE MAYOR.
IT'S ONE THING IF THE MAYOR WANTS TO SEND MEMOS BUT TO PUSH
THE COMMITTEE IN A CERTAIN DIRECTION, I GUESS WHAT IT MEANS,
IF THEY ARE GOING TO DO THAT, THEN WE SHOULD GO SIT THERE AS
WELL.
SO THAT'S A SIDE ISSUE.
I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK THE CHARTER REVIEW
COMMITTEE TO GIVE US AN UPDATE ON THE ANSWERS TO OUR
QUESTIONS ON JULY 30th.
HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE COME AND GIVE US THEIR RESPONSE TO OUR
QUESTIONS.
WE HAD ABOUT 30 QUESTIONS.
WE NEED TO KNOW WHETHER THEY ARE GOING TO ANSWER OUR
QUESTIONS OR NOT AS KIND OF A MIDPOINT.
IF THEY ARE NOT, THEN WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT WE'RE GOING
TO DO ABOUT IT.
8:26:47PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
I'VE BEEN ADVISED THEY DISMISSED ALL OF
OUR QUESTIONS.
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON.
A SECOND FROM --
8:26:54PM >>LUIS VIERA:
IF I MAY, I'LL SECOND THAT, BUT COULD WE GET

IT TIME LIMITED LIKE MAYBE TEN MINUTES.
8:27:00PM >>BILL CARLSON:
FOR TEN MINUTES.
8:27:01PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
ARE YOU ASKING FOR A PRESENTATION FROM
THEM?
UNDER WHAT PART OF THE AGENDA.
8:27:08PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
UNDER PRESENTATIONS I GUESS.
8:27:12PM >> IS THERE ROOM?
8:27:15PM >>BILL CARLSON:
ON JULY 30th IT LOOKED TO ME LIKE IT WAS.
8:27:21PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
NO, WE'RE FULL.
AND THAT IS THE BUDGET --
8:27:28PM >>LUIS VIERA:
CAN WE DO IT WRITTEN?
CAN THEY DO A REPORT WRITTEN?
8:27:35PM >>BILL CARLSON:
PROBABLY GET --
8:27:37PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
CAN WE DO AUGUST 6?
8:27:40PM >>BILL CARLSON:
YEAH, AUGUST 6.
8:27:41PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I SECOND WITH THE TEN MINUTES.
8:27:43PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON FOR AUGUST
6 FOR THE CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION --
8:27:47PM >>BILL CARLSON:
UNFORTUNATELY, ASHLEY, I THINK SHE'S SOMEONE
WHO WANTS TO FOLLOW THE QUESTIONS, AND THERE ARE OTHERS WHO
DISAGREE.
IT WOULD BE BETTER IF THE ONES WHO DISAGREE WOULD COME AND
TELL US WHY.
8:27:59PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON TO HAVE THE
CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION COME TO CITY COUNCIL TO ANSWER --

8:28:07PM >>BILL CARLSON:
GIVE US AN UPDATE ON THE ANSWERS TO OUR
QUESTIONS.
8:28:16PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
AUGUST 6 IS GOOD.
UNLESS THERE IS SOMETHING WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT.
WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
OPPOSED?
AYES HAVE IT.
COUNCILMAN VIERA.
8:28:54PM >>LUIS VIERA:
YES, SIR.
MY AIDE SEBASTIAN IS COMING WITH A MEMO WITH SOME SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS AND A MOTION I'M MAKING ABOUT THE RAYS AND REVENUE
SOURCES.
SEBASTIAN WILL BE COMING SHORTLY ON THOSE.
IT'S COME TO MY ATTENTION -- I'M JOKING.
8:29:11PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
WHAT IS UP WITH YOU TODAY?
8:29:14PM >>LUIS VIERA:
I WANTED TO SCARE YOU.
YOU'RE LIKE, NO, PLEASE.
[ LAUGHTER ]
I HAVE NOTHING.
[ LAUGHTER ]
8:29:32PM >>BILL CARLSON:
CAN I SAY ONE THING ABOUT --
8:29:34PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
NO!
[ LAUGHTER ]
COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG.

8:29:46PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
HOW WAS THAT CHANNELING COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG
AS A CHAIR.
NO!
8:29:51PM >>BILL CARLSON:
SHE'S A LOT TOUGHER.
[ LAUGHTER ]
8:29:54PM >>NAYA YOUNG:
SURPRISINGLY, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING.
YOU ALL DRAINED ME TODAY.
8:30:03PM >>BILL CARLSON:
THAT'S TO MAKE UP FOR BEING MEAN TO US
EARLIER.
8:30:06PM >>LUIS VIERA:
REALLY FAST, TEN SECONDS, MR. CHAIR.
SO I DID WANT TO SAY WE HAVE COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON JULY 17
AS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL KARAOKE DAY.
LET IT BE WRITTEN.
8:30:24PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO.
8:30:24PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
I HAVE NOTHING, THANK YOU.
8:30:26PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.
8:30:27PM >>CHARLIE MIRANDA:
I HAVE MORE TO SAY, BUT I WON'T DO IT.
8:30:30PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
SO YOU HEARD THIS ALREADY TODAY.
THIS IS FOR THE COUNCIL VERSION OF IT.
I MOTION FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY AND CITY ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE TO WORK WITH ANY RELEVANT DEPARTMENT CRA DIRECTOR AND
CRA ATTORNEY TO CREATE STANDARD RULES OF PROCEDURES, I.E.
ATTENDANCE QUORUM, OPENING AND CLOSING TIMELINE FOR
APPLICATIONS, ET CETERA, FOR ALL COMMITTEES AND BOARDS AND
RETURN WITH A DRAFT ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2026 FOR CITY COUNCIL.

8:30:54PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM CHAIRMAN
CLENDENIN, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA.
ALL IN FAVOR?
AYE.
8:31:00PM >>MARTIN SHELBY:
DO YOU HAVE A COPY FOR THE CLERK?
8:31:03PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
YES.
THE DATE IS DIFFERENT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL.
SPEAKING OF CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION, HENDERSON SENT AN
E-MAIL WHICH YOU ALL SHOULD HAVE.
AS ALLUDED TO BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON EARLIER, THEY ARE
REQUESTING INPUT FROM CITY COUNCIL ON ESTABLISHING A ZONING
HEARING MASTER OR SIMILAR TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE EXPERT
INPUT WHEN WE'RE MAKING OUR DECISIONS.
I'M BRINGING THAT TO YOUR ATTENTION AS INPUT. IF YOU CHOOSE
TO PROVIDE THEM WITH INPUT, I'LL LEAVE THAT UP TO YOU.
I AM CHOOSING NOT TO.
I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TOMORROW IS THE TEN-YEAR
ANNIVERSARY OF THE PULSE MASSACRE IN ORLANDO.
SAD DAY FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
AND THE OTHER NATION AS WELL.
I'VE HAD FRIENDS THAT HAD FAMILY MEMBERS OR FRIENDS THAT
WERE INVOLVED IN THAT SHOOTING.
IN FACT, IRONICALLY, I WAS IN ORLANDO THAT EVENING FOR A
CONFERENCE AND WAS SUPPOSED TO GO THERE THAT NIGHT BUT DID
NOT.

8:32:10PM >>GUIDO MANISCALCO:
ONE GENTLEMAN IS BURIED HERE IN TAMPA AT
MYRTLE HILL.
MY FAMILY KNEW HIS FAMILY.
AND ONE OF THE SURVIVORS IS ALSO IN THE WEST TAMPA AREA, AND
WE SEE HER EVERY SO OFTEN.
I REMEMBER THAT MORNING.
I WOKE UP AND IT WAS LIKE FIVE VICTIMS, TEN VICTIMS.
IT WAS AWFUL.
8:32:31PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ALL PEOPLE GOING OUT FOR A NIGHT TO HAVE
FUN AND TO BE WITH PEOPLE THEY LOVE AND CARE ABOUT AND HAVE
AN EVENT LIKE THAT IS AWFUL.
8:32:39PM >>BILL CARLSON:
IT WAS A HORRIBLE ATTACK AGAINST THE LGBT
COMMUNITY AND IT WAS HORRIBLE FOR ALL OF US TO -- ALL HAD
FRIENDS CONNECTED IN SOME WAY.
THE OTHER THING, I WAS IN BRUSSELS WITH MY OLDEST SON AND
BRUSSELS HAD JUST -- THE AIRPORT HAD JUST BEEN ATTACKED A
COUPLE OF MONTHS EARLIER.
ALL MY FAMILY WAS AFRAID.
PEOPLE WERE SAYING BE CAREFUL GOING THROUGH BRUSSELS.
LANDED IN BRUSSELS AND FOUND OUT ORLANDO HAD BEEN HIT.
NOT ONLY WAS IT AN ATTACK AGAINST THE LGBT COMMUNITY, IT
SHOWED HOW VULNERABLE WE ARE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
PEOPLE WORRY ABOUT DIFFERENT KINDS OF COUNTRIES BUT THIS
HAPPENED IN ORLANDO.
IT WAS TERRIFYING.

THE OTHER THING I WANT TO SAY, FOR FUN, I'VE BEEN WATCHING
ALL THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES ON TWITTER ABOUT THE RAYS ISSUE.
I JUST WANT TO SAY FOR THE RECORD, PROBABLY NOBODY IS
WATCHING, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT THE RAYS PERSONALLY
ASKED ME, THEY SAID THEY WEREN'T READY FOR TODAY TO DISCUSS
IT.
AND THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES, AH, STUPID CITY COUNCIL, THEY
ARE DELAYING IT.
THE RAYS ASKED US TO DO THIS.
IS THAT CORRECT FOR YOU TOO?
THEY REQUESTED THIS.
I WISH THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS WOULD STOP.
IT'S NOT NECESSARY.
WHAT WE DID TODAY I THINK IS IN EARNEST TRYING TO BRING
RESOLUTION TO A NEGOTIATION PROCESS.
THANK YOU.
8:34:04PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
ONE LAST THING BECAUSE I GET A LITTLE BIT
EMOTIONAL ON THE PULSE THING, TOO, BEING A MEMBER OF THE
LGBT COMMUNITY AND THOSE OF US MINORITIES AND DISCRIMINATED
AGAINST AND YOU SEE THIS WITHIN THE JEWISH COMMUNITY NOW AND
PEOPLE THAT ARE TARGETED, AND WE SEE IT HERE IN CITY
COUNCIL.
WE SEE THE HATE.
AND I'M PROUD THAT THIS IS A COUNCIL THAT STANDS UP
ROUTINELY AND UNIVERSALLY AGAINST THAT, REGARDLESS -- I

THINK WE ARE A CITY THAT STANDS UP AGAINST THAT HATE.
I APPRECIATE PERSONALLY THE SUPPORT THAT I'VE RECEIVED FROM
MY COWORKERS HERE.
COUNCILMAN VIERA WITH THE MOTION THAT YOU MADE WITH SOME OF
THE STUFF THAT'S DIRECTED PERSONALLY AT ME.
I HOPE THAT WE CONTINUE TO BE THAT COUNCIL AND TO BE THAT
CITY THAT DOESN'T TOLERATE HATE BASED ON WHO YOU ARE, WHAT
RACE, WHAT ETHNICITY, WHAT RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION OR WHO YOU
LOVE.
I APPRECIATE THAT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
8:35:05PM >> [INAUDIBLE]
8:35:07PM >>LUIS VIERA:
THAT WAS A JOKE.
MR. CHAIRMAN, SAY SOMETHING REALLY QUICK, TEN SECONDS.
THANK YOU.
I'M PROUD THAT OUR CHAIRMAN OF CITY COUNCIL IS A GAY MAN.
I'M PROUD THAT OUR MAYOR IS A GAY WOMAN, AND WE ALSO
REMEMBER GREAT HEROES IN OUR TIME LIKE THE LATE OFFICER LOIS
MORERO AND MR. MIRANDA REMEMBERS THE GREAT STRUGGLE SHE HAD
WHEN SHE WAS KILLED IN ACTION.
AGAIN, A LOT OF LGBT HEROES HERE IN TAMPA.
GOD BLESS YOU.
8:35:35PM >>ALAN CLENDENIN:
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA.

ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
AYES.
OPPOSED?
WE ARE ADJOURNED.
[ SOUNDING GAVEL ]

DISCLAIMER:
THIS FILE REPRESENTS AN UNEDITED VERSION OF REALTIME
CAPTIONING WHICH SHOULD NEITHER BE RELIED UPON FOR COMPLETE
ACCURACY NOR USED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT.
ANY PERSON WHO NEEDS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE
PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO HIRE A COURT REPORTER.

▶ Meeting Video